Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutXR2022-3196 - Alternative Material & MethodsXRaopm -jig6 �EWPp�T CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 'gy f COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Jq�Op"wr BUILDING DIVISION xB1013 c " P 100 Civic Center Drive I P.O. Box 1768 1 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 I gciFon� www.newcortbeachca.00v 1 (949) 644-3200 NtlypoCoF etch CASE NO.: 2D213— o) III FOR STAFF USE ONLY X❑ REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION TO PROVISIONS OF TITLE 9 (FIRE CODE) OR TITLE 15 (BUILDING CODE) OF THE NEWPORT BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE (See Reverse for Basis for Approval) (Fee $297) ❑ REQUEST FOR ALTERNATE MATERIAL OR METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION (See Reverse for Basis for Approval) (Fee $297) For above requests, complete Sections 1, 2 & 3 below by printing in ink or typing. JOB ADDRESS: SITE ADDRESS: 15 Boardwalk Owner Kristen & Matthew Dickson Address 15 Boardwalk Newport Beach zip 92660 Daytime Phone (949) 293-3061 Plan Check # rC. COa4 Occupancy Classification Use of Building Project Status Construction Type Verified by No. of Items 0 Fee due DISTRIBUTION: ❑ Owner ❑ Petitioner ❑ Fire PETITIONER: Petitioner of Stories a # of Units Plan Check N2G ❑ Inspector ❑ Other Address 3090 Bristol Street - 4th Floor Costa Mesa, CA zip92626 Daytime Phone (949) 204-0076 Email: hello@ mesastudio.design 1 2 1 REQUEST: Submit plans if necessary to illustrate request. Additional sheets or data may be attached. 11 USTIFICATION/FINDINGS OF EQUIVALENCY: CODE SECTIONS: Feel that the intent of emergency escape to exit a building (in the event of CRC R310.1 �an intarior fire) is met with more ease through a door onto a rated deck that is open to the yard (path to public Petitioner's Position Princi CA Professional Lic. # C-37379 Date: 01.17.23 FOR STAFF USE ONLY DEPARTMENT ACTION: In accordance with: ❑ CBC 104.11/CFC 104.9 (Alternate materials & methods) ❑ Concurrence from Fire Code Official is required. ❑ Approved ❑ Disapproved By: Date Request (DOES) OES N&r-)Jessen any fire protection requirements. equest (DOES) ( OES N0—T) lessen the structural integrity ►,/ /1alYCBC 104.10/CFC 104.8 (CBC Modification) ❑ Written Comments Attached The Request is: ® Granted ❑ Denied (See reverse for appeal information) ❑ Granted (Ratification required) Conditions of Approval: CHIEF BUR DING OFFICIAL — — Signature SPosition Print Name 10-K —e Date D2—a2— zo23 APPEAL OF DIVISION ACTION TO THE BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS (See Reverse) (Signature, statement of owner or applicant, statement of reasons for appeal and filing fees are required.) CASHIER RECEIPT NUMBER: 000 720t,—202-3 Forms\modif 07/08/22 Guidelines for Approval of Alternate Materials, Design and Methods of Construction Basis For Approval For the Chief Building Official and Fire Code Official or their designated agent to approve a request for modification or a request for alternate material or method of construction, he/she must determine that special, individual reasons exist that make compliance with the strict letter of the Code impractical and that equivalency is provided. The resulting condition must be in conformance with the spirit and purpose of the Code provisions involved and that such modification does not lessen fire protection, structural integrity or occupant safety. The applicant must provide sufficient information with this application to allow the above evaluation to be made. Requirements for Submittals The applicant design professional shall prepare a Written Report that describes the alternate proposal along with the applicable data listed below: • State specific code provisions for which alternative is requested and why request is being submitted. • Describe by code section those provisions for which alternative is desired. • Compare the proposed alternative versus the code requirements in terms of structural strength, suitability, effectiveness, fire resistance, safety and health impacts affecting the building or user of the building. • Demonstrate that the proposed alternative is compatible with balance of code requirements. • When applicable, specify how authoritative consensus document(s) are used to substantiate proposal. (Reference draft ICC Building Performance Code Commentary Section 1.4.2.3 for background information). • Provide assumptions, references, and documentation of evaluation methods utilized. This includes intended use, input data, anticipated outputs, and limitations of computer models and other analytical tools or methods. • Specify when and where special inspection and testing are required and the standards of acceptance for demonstrating compliance. Show how the proposed alternate, if accepted, will be identified on the job site. • Where land use restrictions and building setbacks are required, deed restrictions may be an appropriate method to ensure continued compliance. • State how and where alternate proposal is incorporated within construction plans and prepare plan amendments as necessary. The design professional has the responsibility to coordinate all construction documents and ensure compatibility between documents. • The report and design documents shall be dated, signed and stamped by the design professional according to the plan submittal procedure. • For alternate methods of design requests, the applicant shall set performance criteria for his design. Performance criteria shall be reviewed, amended and approved by the Building or Fire Code Official prior to start of design. Alternative Design Review/Verification The Chief Building Official or Fire Code Official has the responsibility to review design submittals for compliance to the adopted codes and procedures. If the Building or Fire Code Official does not have the expertise on staff to make a thorough and competent review, the Building or Fire Code Official shall select a consultant that possesses the necessary qualifications to perform a third -party or peer review. Cost of peer review shall be paid by applicant to the Building Division prior to commencing the review. • Verify that all applicable information and justifications listed above as requirements for submittals is received and verify that evaluation and design methods used by designer are appropriate to the alternative proposed. • Verify products are being used in accordance with their listing conditions as required by recognized listing agencies. If not available, require documentation and/or testing to demonstrate compliance with intent of code and intended use. • Evaluate performance of material and possible flaws that could affect performance of material in its installed state. The reviewer shall document that the submittal has been reviewed and accepted as meeting the alternative materials, design and methods of construction provisions of the code. If the Building or Fire Code Official is not satisfied that the applicant has met the conditions, the request should be denied in writing with the applicable reason(s). Inspection/Field Verification The alternate proposal as approved in the construction documents must be verified by inspection, and, where necessary, testing as follows: • To verify that alternate materials, systems and fabricated products comply with accepted design criteria and the manufacturer's and engineer's installation procedures, inspectors should check product labeling, certification, quality assurance processes, and testing, as applicable. • When appropriate, an approved third party quality assurance inspection and testing service may be required for continuous and complex inspection and testing activities. This is intended to verify that construction complies with the code and the approved plans. Information on Procedure for Appeal from a Determination or Action by the Chief Building Official or Fire Code Official Appeal from the determination or action of the Chief Building Official or Fire Code Official or their designated agent may be made to the Building and Fire Board of Appeals. To appeal, the applicant must provide special individual reasons that make compliance with the strict letter of the Code impractical. Appeals or ratifications pertaining to State Disabled Access Standards require complete evidence to substantiate that the proposed design is equivalent to that prescribed by that standards or that due to legal or physical constraints, compliance with the standards or providing equivalency would create an unreasonable hardship. Appeals must be submitted on the Appeal Form available at Permit Counter accompanied by the proper fee. You will be notified in writing of the appeal hearing's time and date. MODIFICATION #: 001 DATE: 1/17/2023 SCALE:1/8" = P PROJECT NAME: DICKSON REMODEL PROJECT #: 21011 REFERENCE SHEET: A2-02 ITEM #: 1 m SA MESA STUDIO 55.0• 4'.6• 8'-o. 31'8" 1010" EXISTING CONDITION: EGRESS ONTO WOOD TRELLIS BELOW aoe aeLow o.lo D.oc ALCOVE/ OFFICE 0.11 ool D.os Dnl Doi ool v.a•ILI o.W 1 o sano sH 1o.sH 1a6o SH uPPET _ o a os O MASTER BATH D. D.os TILF DIS on — —771 MASTER X MASTER BEDROOM SITTING o.m "-ac 1,'ac CARPET CnPPEi ♦o SH ao) Dos MASTER T T W.I.C. o nc lslos FG BA. 2�j Dn BEDROOM 2 TU Q50 SL o'[LG 1686 FG <nAPEi � D ® 1666 FG E'A aH 16i0 FG — 1CT OP H ELLO@MESASTUD I O.DES I GN MESASTUDIO.DESIGN MODIFICATION #: 001 DATE: 1/17/2023 SCALE: NTS PROJECT NAME: DICKSON REMODEL PROJECT #: 21011 REFERENCE SHEET: AD-01 ITEM #: 1 MESA STUDIO ORIPPED DECK JOISTS (SEE STRUCTURAL). SLOPE ;" PER 2 FOOT O1-HOUR CLASS A RATED 3 WATERPROOF DECK MEMBRANE - - PLI-DECK (ESR-2097) OR — — _ _ _ _ _ APPROVED EQUAL. INSTALL _ _ _ _ PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS O36" MIN. BASE COAT THICKNESS. PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS 4 O q" DECK SUBSTRATE - PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS Oe" TYPE'X' GYPSUM WALL BOARD APPLIED AT RIGHT ANGLES w/ 1-1/4" TYPE S OR W J DRYWALL SCREWS AT 24" O.C. OSECOND LAYER OF e" TYPE'X' GYPSUM WALL BOARD APPLIED AT RIGHT ANGLES w/ 1-7/8" TYPE S OR W DRYWALL SCREWS AT 12" O.C. DRYWALL SCREWS PLACED 2" BACK ON EITHER SIDE OF 2ND LAYER END JOINTS, 12" O.C. O2X6 T&G CEILING o/ WATER RESISTANT PAPER, MIN (2) LAYERS (60 MIN. GRADE'D') - SURFACE EXPOSED FACE 5 6 NOTE: APPLY SHEAR PANEL PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS 7 TO STUDS PRIOR TO APPLICATION OF FINISHES WATERPROOF DECK — 1 HOUR MESA STUDIO, INC @ 21011_E_W_FLASH _ DEC K_02 SCALE 3"= 1'-O" 14 HELLO@MESASTUDIO.DESIGN MESASTUDIO.DESIGN 03 ®iCC EVALUATION SERVICE° www.icc-es.org 1 (800) 423-6587 1 (562) 699-0543 ICC-ES Evaluation Report ESR-2097 DIVISION: 07 00 00—THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION Section: 07 18 13—Pedestrian Traffic Coatings REPORT HOLDER: PLI-DEK LLC EVALUATION SUBJECT: PLI-DEK AND CON-DEK WALKING DECK AND ROOF COVERING SYSTEMS 1.0 EVALUATION SCOPE Compliance with the following codes: ■ 2021, 2018, 2015, 2012, 2009, and 2006 International Building Code® (IBC) ■ 2021, 2018, 2015, 2012, 2009 and 2006 International Residential Code® (IRC) ■ 2013 Abu Dhabi International Building Code (ADIBC)t tThe ADIBC is based on the 2009 IBG 2009 IBC code sections referenced in this report are the same sections in the ADIBC. ■ Other Code (see Section 8.0.) For evaluation for compliance with codes adopted by Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety (LADES), see ESR-2097 LABC and LARC Supplement. Properties evaluated: ■ Durability ■ Wind resistance ■ Fire classification ■ Fire resistance ■ Surface burning characteristics 2.0 USES The Pli-Dek and Con-Dek systems are walking deck and roof covering systems for use directly over plywood (Pli-Dek) or concrete (Con-Dek) decks. The systems are also used as components of one -hour fire -resistance - rated roof assemblies as described in Section 4.4. The systems provide a Class A or Class B roof covering fire classification as described in Tables 1, 1A and 2. The systems have Class A surface burning characteristics as described in Sections 3.1 and 3.2. Compliance with International Coe Compliance to State/Regional Codes A Subsidiary of the International Code Council Reissued August 2022 This report is subject to renewal August 2023. 3.0 DESCRIPTION 3.1 Pli-Dek System: The Pli-Dek system is a polymer -modified, cementitious walking deck and roof covering system that consists of a plywood substrate covered with expanded metal lath; a polymer -modified cementitious base coat; an optional reinforcing fabric layer; and intermediate and sealer coats. See Section 4.0 and Tables 1 and 2 for recognized system configurations and corresponding component requirements. The surface of the Pli-Dek system has a Class A classification, with a flame -spread index of 25 or less and a smoke developed index of 450 or less, based on testing in accordance with ASTM E84. 3.1.1 Materials: 3.1.1.1 Substrate: Exterior -grade plywood must comply with U.S. DOC PS-1 or PS-2. Minimum thickness is specified in Tables 1 and 2 of this report. 3.1.1.2 Metal Lath: Metal lath must be a minimum 2.5-pound-per-square-yard (1.36 kghri hot -dipped galvanized lath, complying with ASTM C847. 3.1.1.3 Staples: Staples must be No. 16 gage, I/e-inch-crown (22.2 mm), 5/8-inch-long (15.9 mm), corrosion -resistant staples complying with ASTM F1667. 3.1.1.4 Pli-Dek GU-80-1 Gray Base: A proprietary mixture of portland cement and silica sand packaged in 46-pound (20.9 kg) bags that is mixed on -site with the GU-80-1 Liquid Admix, at a ratio of 1 gallon (3.8 L) of Liquid Admix for each 46-pound (20.9 kg) bag of GU-80-1 Gray Base, in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The mixture is used as a component of the base coat and intermediate coat of Pli-Dek systems. 3.1.1.5 Pli-Dek GU-80-1 Top Coat: A proprietary mixture of portland cement and silica sand packaged in 46-pound (20.9 kg) bags that is mixed on -site with the GU-80-1 Liquid Admix, at a ratio of 1.25 gallons (4.7 L) of GU-80-1 Liquid Admix for each 46-pound (20.9 kg) bag of GU-80-1 Top Coat, in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The mixture is used as a component of the intermediate coat of Pli-Dek systems and as a component of the third coat of the Con-Dek system. 3.1.1.6 Pli-Dek GU-80-1 Custom Top Coat: A proprietary mixture of portland cement and silica sand packaged in 46-pound (20.9 kg) bags that is mixed on -site with the GU-80-1 Liquid Admix, at a ratio of 1.25 gallons (4.7 L) of ICC-F.S Evaluation Reports are not to be construed as r'apt esenfing aesthetics or any other attributes oro specificalli, addressed, nmare they to be construed IM Ad as an endorsement ofte hsubject ofthe report are recommendation for its use. There is no warranty by ICCEvaluatian Service, LLC, express or implied, as .r,:. .r u to anii,ftnding or other matter in this report, or as to airy➢roducl covered by the, epa't Copyright © 2022 ICC Evaluation Service, LLC. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 8 ESR-2097 I Most Widely Accepted and Trusted Page 3 of 8 4.2.4 Pli-Dek U-Underlayment for Ceramic Tile: The system must be applied in accordance with the schedule in Table 1 of this report. After curing for eight hours at 75°F (23.8°C), the surface can be used as a backing for exterior adhered veneer, such as ceramic tiles, applied in accordance with the veneer manufacturer's instructions and the applicable code. 4.2.5 Method of Repair: The damaged area must be completely removed, including the base coat and lath. New metal lath must be stapled to the clean, dry substrate, and the system reapplied as described in Sections 4.2.1 through 4.2.4 of this report. If substrate damage occurs, the retention of the fire -resistance and strength properties of the system must be investigated. 4.3 Con-Dek System: 4.3.1 Preparation of Substrate: Concrete substrates must be designed and installed in accordance with the requirements of the applicable code. The concrete surface must be free of loose particles, fins, ridges, voids or air -entrained holes, curing agents, bond breakers, oil, grease, dust or any foreign matter which would prevent bonding. Control and expansion joints must be installed at stress concentration points to control cracking. The concrete surface to receive coatings must be roughened by water/sand/bead/shot blasting, etching or grinding in accordance with the manufacturers published installation instructions. The concrete surface must be sloped to a minimum of 1/4:12 for proper drainage in accordance with the requirements of the applicable code. The concrete surface must be properly cured prior to installation. Flashing must be provided in accordance with the applicable code. 4.3.2 Con-Dek Application: The fiberglass mat must be laid over the substrate with minimum and maximum overlaps of 1/4 and 1/2 inch (6.4 and 12.7 mm), respectively, and extend to the furthermost edge of the deck. PD Resin must then be applied overthe mat at a rate of 50 square feet per gallon (1.23 m21), and must be worked into the mat using a 1/2-inch (12.7 mm) nap roller or trowel. Afterthe resin is allowed to dry for a minimum of eight hours, the surface is inspected and prepared for a second coat of PD Resin at a rate of approximately 100 square feet per gallon (2.46 m2/L). The fiberglass and resin coating must cure for a minimum of two to six hours before application of the third and sealer coats noted in Table 1A. The desired third coat (GU-80-1 Top Coat or Custom Coat mixed with the GU-80-1 Liquid Admix) is applied, and the finished product is sealed with either the GS-88-1 or GS-99-1. The temperature range for application is a minimum of 50°(100C) and a maximum of 110°F (430C), with ideal conditions being between 60°F (15.6°C) and 90OF (32.2°C) in high humidity. The coatings must not be applied in moist or inclement weather. Pot life and curing time vary with temperature and humidity. At 70°F (21.10C), the maximum working life is one hour. 4.4 One -hour Fire -resistance -rated Construction: 4.4.1 Pli-Dek System: Pli-Dek systems identified in Table 1, having a minimum base coat thickness of IAA inch (4.8 mm) and installed in accordance with this report over 5/a-inch-thick (15.9 mm) exterior -grade plywood, with minimum 2-by-8 solid sawn lumber joists spaced at 16 inches (406 mm) on center, and with all substrate joints blocked, ortong ue-and-groove exterior -grade plywood, may be substituted for the double wood floor described in Item 13 of 2021,2018, 2015 and 2012 IBC Table 721.1(3) [2009 and 2006 IBC Table 720.1(3)]. When installation is over 2-by-8 joists, the design bending stress assigned to the joists must be limited to 78 percent of the code -prescribed design values. 4.4.2 Con-Dek System: When the Can-Dek system is installed, as described in Section 4.3, over a concrete roof with a one -hour fire -rated resistance per 2021, 2018, 2015 and 2012 IBC Table 721.1(3) [2009 and 2006 IBC Table 720.1 (3)], the Con-Dek system will not change the rating of the assembly. 4.5 Roof Covering Fire Classification: 4.5.1 Pli-Dek System: When installation is in accordance with this report, the assemblies have the fire classifications noted in Tables 1 and 2. 4.5.2 Con-Dek System: When the Con-Dek system is installed as described in Section 4.3 and Table 1A, at a maximum slope of 1/4 inch per foot (2 percent slope), the system has a Class A roof classification. 4.6 Wind Resistance: The wind uplift resistance of the Pli-Dek and Con-Dek walking deck and roof covering systems is limited to the wind uplift capacity of the roof deck construction on which the system is installed. 5.0 CONDITIONS OF USE The Pli-Dek and Con-Dek Walking Deck and Roof Covering Systems described in this report comply with, or are suitable alternatives to what is specified in, those codes listed in Section 1.0 of this report, subject to the following conditions: 5.1 The systems must be installed by applicators trained and approved by Pli-Dek LLC, in accordance with this report, the manufacturer's published installation instructions and the applicable code. If there is a conflict between the manufacturer's published installation instructions and this report, this report governs. 5.2 The roof deck on which the Pli-Dek system is installed must be designed to resist the design wind pressures of the applicable code. 5.3 The roof deck on which the Con-Dek system is installed must be designed to resist the design wind pressures of the applicable code. 5.4 The products are manufactured for Pli-Dek LLC at manufacturing locations identified in the approved quality manual, under a quality -control program with inspections by ]CC -ES. 6.0 EVIDENCE SUBMITTED 6.1 Data in accordance with the ICC-ES Acceptance Criteria for Walking Decks (AC39), dated June 2017 (editorially revised November 2020). 6.2 Report of small-scale fire tests in accordance with ASTM E119. 6.3 Reports of testing in accordance with ASTM E84. 7.0 IDENTIFICATION 7.1 Each component container is identified with a permanent label bearing the report holder's name (Pli-Dek LLC) and address, the product designation, the lot number, and the evaluation report number (ESR-2097). The label includes the one-year shelf life, date of manufacture and the flame spread index and smoke developed index of the installed system. Rolls of Pli-Dek Seam Paper are identified with the product name (PD Seam Paper) and the Pli-Dek LLC name. ESR-2097 I Most Widely Accepted and Trusted Page 5 of 8 TABLE IA—CON-DEK CLASS A WALKING DECK AND ROOF COVERING SYSTEM' SYSTEM SUBSTRATE MAXIMUM DECK SLOPE BASE COAT INTERMEDIATE COAT THIRD COAT SEALER COAT GU-80-1 Top Coat applied at GS-88-1 applied at PD Resin applied to PD Resin applied 175 sq. ft. per bag 100 sq. ft. per gal. or Con-Dek System Concrete s 12 3/.-oz. fiberglass mat at a at 100 sq. ft. mixture or GS-99-1 applied at rate of 50 sq. ft per gal per gal. Custom Top Coat 200 sq. ft. per gal. applied at 175 sq. ft. per bag mixture For SI: 1 inch = 25.4 mm, 1 ft' = 0.0920 m', 1 gallon = 3.7851. 'Minimum slope is'/4:12. 'Concrete substrate must comply with the applicable code and have a minimum compressive strength of 2500 psi (17238 l [minimum of 25 MPa is required under ADIBC Appendix L, Section 5.1.1]. TABLE 2—PLI-DEK CLASS B WALKING DECK AND ROOF COVERING SYSTEM' MINIMUM MAXIMUM BASE COAT SYSTEM SUBSTRATE' DECK BASE COAT INTERMEDIATE COAT SEALER COAT THICKNESS SLOPE (inch) 3/4 gallon of PD Epoxy PLI-DEK T— '/2-inch-thick GU-80-1 Gray Base applied at PD Resin applied at thoroughly mixed with 100 lbs. of selected aggregate' and 3/16 Troweled Pebbles and Epoxy plywood 5:12 35 sq. ft. per bag 80 sq. ft. per gal. troweled over a 30-square- mixture foot area For SI: 1 inch = 25.4 mm, 1 ft'= 0.0920 m', 1 gallon = 3.785 L, 1 pound = 0.45 kg. 'Minimum slope is'/4:12. 'Aggregate is specified in Section 3.1.1.14 of this report. 'Substrate thickness is minimum thickness. ICC-ES Evaluation Report ESR-2097 CBC and CRC Supplement Reissued August 2022 This report is subject to renewal August 2023. www.icg:g§.org 1 (800) 423-6587 1 (562) 699-0543 A Subsidiary of the International Code Council® DIVISION: 07 00 00—THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION Section: 07 18 13—Pedestrian Traffic Coatings REPORT HOLDER: PLI-DEK LLC EVALUATION SUBJECT: PLI-DEK AND CON-DEK WALKING DECK AND ROOF COVERING SYSTEMS 1.0 REPORT PURPOSE AND SCOPE Purpose: The purpose of this evaluation report supplement is to indicate that Pli-Dek and Con-Dek Walking Deck and Roof Covering Systems, described in ICC-ES evaluation report ESR-2097, have also been evaluated for compliance with the code(s) noted below. Applicable code edition(s): ■ 2019 California Building Code (CBC) For evaluation of applicable chapters adopted by the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) AKA: California Department of Health Care Access and Information (HCAI) and the Division of State Architect (DSA), see Sections 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 below. ■ 2019 California Residential Code (CRC) 2.0 CONCLUSIONS 2.1 CBC: The Pli-Dek and Con-Dek Walking Deck and Roof Covering Systems, described in Sections 2.0 through 7.0 of the evaluation report ESR-2097, comply with CBC Chapter 15, provided the design and installation are in accordance with the 2018 International Building Code® (IBC) provisions noted in the evaluation report and the additional requirements of CBC Chapters 15, 16 and 17, as applicable. The Pli-Dek and Con-Dek Roof Covering Systems may be used in the exterior design and construction of new buildings located in a Fire Hazard Severity Zone within State Responsibility Areas or any Wildland—Urban Interface Fire Area, provided installation is in accordance with the 2018 International Building Code® (IBC) provisions noted in the evaluation report and the additional requirements of Sections 701A.3 and 705A of the CBC. The Pli-Dek and Con-Dek Walking Deck Systems comply with the performance requirements of Section 704A.3 when tested in accordance with ASTM E84 in accordance with Item 2 of CBC Section 709A.3 and may be used in the exterior design and construction of decking in new buildings located in a Fire Hazard Severity Zone within State Responsibility Areas or any Wildland—Urban Interface Fire Area. 2.1.1 OSHPD: The applicable OSHPD Sections and Chapters of the CBC are beyond the scope of this supplement. 2.1.2 DSA: The applicable DSA Sections and Chapters of the CBC are beyond the scope of this supplement. 2.2 CRC: The Pli-Dek and Con-Dek Walking Deck and Roof Covering Systems, described in Sections 2.0 through 7.0 of the evaluation report ESR-2097, comply with CRC Chapter 9, provided the design and installation are in accordance with the 2018 International Residential Code® (IRC) provisions noted in the evaluation report and additional requirements of CRC Chapter 9, as applicable. The Pli-Dek and Con-Dek Roof Covering Systems may be used in the exterior design and construction of new buildings located in a Fire Hazard Severity Zone within State Responsibility Areas or any Wildland—Urban Interface Fire Area, provided installation is in accordance with the 2018 International Residential Code® (IRC) provisions noted in the evaluation report and the additional requirements of Sections R337.1.3.1 and R337.5 of the CRC. The Pli-Dek and Con-Dek Walking Deck Systems comply with the performance requirements of Section R337.4.3 when tested in accordance with ASTM E84 in accordance with Item 2 of CRC Section R337.9.3 and may be used in the exterior design and construction of decking in new buildings located in a Fire Hazard Severity Zone within State Responsibility Areas or any Wildland—Urban Interface Fire Area. This supplement expires concurrently with the evaluation report, reissued August 2022. ICC-ES Evaluation Reports eae not to be construed as representing aesthetics or any other attributes not specifically addressed, nor are they to be ceast, ed '7tVt AAW as an endorsement of the subject of the report or a recommendation for its use. There is no a+arranty by ICC Evaluation Service, LLC, express or implied, as gr tomtyf<rtdingm other matter in this report, or as to arty produc(covered by the report. °�m^1,,�r n,w,` _ Copyright © 2022 [CC Evaluation Service, LLC. All rights reserved. Page 7 of 8