Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-08-13_GP-LCP IC Agenda Meeting PacketAGENDA AGENDA General Plan/LCP Implementation Committee August 13, 2008 3:30 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. Approve Action Minutes from February 27, 2008 Meeting 3:30-3:35 Attachment No. 1 2. General Plan/LCP Implementation - Master Task List Update From Staff and Committee Comments Attachment No. 2 3:35-3:50 3. Fair Share Fee Update Review report and provide direction to staff on setting fee Attachment No. 3 3:50-4:45 4. Items for Future Agenda 4:45- 4:50 5. Public Comments on non -agenda items 4:50-5:00 (some exhibits are only available in hard copy and are not included, please contact the Planning Dept. for copies.) file:lllFllAppslWEBDATAlintemeUPlnAgendasIGPlmplementationCommitteelagD8-13-08.htm [ 10/29/200810:27:12 AM] Attachment No. 1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN/LCP IMPLEMENTAION COMMITTEE DRAFT ACTION MINUTES Action Minutes of the General Plan/LCP Implementation Committee held at the City Council Chambers, City of Newport Beach, on Wednesday, February 27, 2008, Members Present: X Ed Selich, Mayor, Chairman X Leslie Daigle, Mayor Pro Tem E Don Webb, Council Member X Barry Eaton, Planning Commissioner X Robert Hawkins, Planning Commissioner X Michael Toer e, Planning Commissioner E = Excused Committee Actions 1. Agenda Item No. 1 —Approval of minutes Action: Committee approved the draft minutes. Vote: Consensus 2. Agenda Item No. 2 - General Plan/LCP Implementation - Master Task List Action: The Committee was provided an update on the status of several items on the master task list. Vote: none 3. Agenda Item No. 3 - Zoning Code Rewrite — Eating and Drinking Establishments Action: The Committee reviewed and discussed a,discussion paper describing an approach that places more of an emphasis on location, hours of operation and ABC license type to regulate eating and drinking establishments. The Committee directed staff to draft regulations using this approach and to investigate alternative parking requirements for eating and drinking establishments. Vote: Consensus Attachment No. 2 GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION TASKS Interim Zoning Resolution (including ability to require development agreements) Staff, January 9, 2007 -Complete 2. Procedures to implement single- and two-family design policies Staff, March 27, 2007 - Complete Zoning Code and Specific Plan rewrite 4. CLUP amendment Staff, Consultants ■ Planning Commission recommendation on clarification of policies re: coastal bluff development, October 18, 2007 • City Council re -approval to correct notice will include clarification of policies re: coastal bluff development, November 13, 2007 • City Council approval of contract with advocacy firm (D. B. Neish, Inc.), November 13, 2007 ■ Coastal Commission found application complete December 4. 2007 5. Housing Element certification by HCD EIP and staff, TBD ■ Comments on re -submittal received from HCD September 10,2007 • Revised RHNA approved by SCAG July 12, 2007 ■ City Council approval of contract with EIP for required update and certification, December 18, 2007 RR * ��'la�rnrq�oinmrssr4n-revrew�une a08 fty� f+p 12 213(18 Cr Co�nci� e ew u �� � s'Wil Eubtt ttat, August 00$ 6. Park Dedication Fee (Quimby Act) Staff, April 10, 2007- Complete 7. ED Strategic Plan Staff, ADE and EDC, July 10, 2007 - Complete 11: 1: 1I: 8. Fair Share Fee update Consultants IS ow ■ Staff approval of contract for nexus study ( Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC), October 31, 2007 ■ Nexus study first draft reviewed January 16,2008 tps="sdcpipA�ete ux200 e„' C mmrt?eesreu�evu uyl7sf DO 9. Airport Area infrastructure study and fee(s) ROMA and Fair Share Consultant, TBD • First draft submitted for staff review January 23, 2008 10. Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and In -lieu fee Consultant ■ Affordable Housing Task Force review of updated fee study, November 13, 2007 11. Parking Requirements and Management Staff, EDC, • RFP Issued October 12, 2007 ■ No proposals received; ED staff contacted additional firms and extended deadline to January 31, 2008. 12. LCP Implementation Plan Staff, concurrent with/trailing Zoning Code rewrite 13. City Council Ordinance on development agreements Staff, February 27, 2007 —Complete • North Newport Center DA adopted December 18, 2007 14.Traffic signal synchronization Consultant and Public Works staff, master plan January 2008 15. PC rewrite/revisions Property owners for major ones, their schedule Ste TBD 16. Banning Ranch Pre -Annexation and Development Agreement City Council, staff and property owners, TBD 17. Harbor Area Management Plan Consultants, staff and Harbor Commission, September 2008 18. Run-off and Pollution Reduction Plan Coastal/Bay Water Quality Committee and staff, ongoing 19. Database refinements and maintenance Staff, refinements TBD, maintenance ongoing 20. Fiscal Impact Model training ADE and staff, March 29, 2007- Complete 21.Traffic Phasing Ordinance revision re: NBTAM Staff, July 24, 2007- Complete 22. Measure S Guidelines revision re: variable FAR Staff, TBD Lower Priority ■ Municipal Code re: ■ Buildina Code amendments re: maintenance standards buildi ■ Amend City Council Policies on historic, archaeo and paleo resources R�gul�ti�cis for��Q�s#al��dne rn��crderj�tri��d�a�t�Zorritrg C -ode ■ Funding and priority program for construction of noise barriers along arterials 08/08/2008 Attachment No. 3 GENERAL PLAN/LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE August 13, 2008 TO: MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE FROM: Public Works Department Stephen Badum, Public Works Director 949-644-3311 SUBJECT: FAIR SHARE FEE UPDATE BACKGROUND The City first enacted the Fair Share Fee in 1984 in recognition of the fact that there was inadequate funding to complete the arterial highway system and related components. The necessary improvements included widening existing arterials, constructing new arterials, and implementing additional lanes at key intersections. All funding sources including Gas Tax, Measure M, and funding of frontage improvements by developers were considered in establishing the funding shortfall. The shortfall is divided by projected increases in traffic from the future development resulting in a fee per added daily trip. An update to the Fair Share Fee program was approved in 1994 using the same methodology. The approval of the updated General Plan in 2006 included an Implementation Program chapter and updating the Fair Share Fee is Implementation Program 7.2. An update was begun during 2007 to reflect changes in the General Plan and it was determined that this methodology did not meet current legal requirements. The City retained the firm of Revenue & Cost Specialists (RCS) to update the City's existing Fair Share Fees (FSF). The attached report provides documentation of the City's costs which serve as the basis for calculating the circulation system development impact fee known in Newport Beach as the Fair Share Fee. The updated Fees and related information can be found in Chapter 3 and Appendices A, B and C of the Fair Share Fee Nexus Report. The Master Facilities Plan (Appendix A) containing the specifics about the projects that support the fee calculation is a separate document. This memorandum provides an executive summary of the Report, which includes both nexus and proportional analyses. These analyses are intended to (1) identify the relationship between future land development and its impact on circulations system needs; and (2) recognize and reconcile the difference between the City's desired level of service required of new development, per statements in the various General Plan 1 elements, with that of the de -facto or actual level of service provided to the existing community. In addition to detailed discussions addressing the legal requirements of a fee program, the approach used in this update to the FSF has another significant change from that used in previous studies. This analysis uses daily trip -miles as the key indicator of development impact rather than just daily trips. The use of trip -miles is considered to be a more appropriate indicator as it reflects the fact that differing types of development generate not only different numbers of trips but also that those trips typically vary in length depending on their purpose. For example, commute trips between home and work are normally much longer than trips between home and the grocery store. The use of trip -miles results in a clearer assessment of the impact of development on the circulation system. CALCULATION OF FAIR SHARE FEES In California, State legislation sets certain legal and procedural parameters for the charging of those fees. This legislation was passed as AB1600 by the California Legislature and is now codified as California Government Code Sections 66000 through 66009. This State law went into effect on January 1, 1989. AB1600 requires documentation of projects to be financed by Fair Share Fees prior to their levy and collection, and that the monies collected actually be committed within five years to a project of "direct benefit' to the development which paid the fees. Many states have such controlling statutes. Specifically, AB1600 requires the following: 1. Delineation of the PURPOSE of the fee. 2. Determination of the USE of the fee. 3. Determination of the RELATIONSHIP between the use of the fee and the type of development paying the fee. 4. Determination of the relationship between the NEED for the facility and the type of development project. NOTE: Numbers 2 & 4 will be reversed throughout the chapters in the Report because need should be identified before use. 5. Determination of the relationship between the AMOUNT of the fee and the COST of the portion of the facility attributed to the specific development project. The Report, with some additions, utilizes the basic methodology consistent with the above requirements of AB1600. Briefly, the following steps were undertaken in the calculation of impact fees for the City and are listed below: 2 1. Define the level of service needed within the General Plan area for each project identified as necessary. In some areas, certain statistical measures are commonly used to measure or define an acceptable level of service for a category of infrastructure. Street intersections, for instance, are commonly rated based on a Level of Service (LOS) scale of "A" to "F. 2. Review the land use map and determine the existing mix of land uses and amount of future additional development. The magnitude of growth and its impacts can thus be determined by considering this land use data when planning needed infrastructure. The inventory can be found summarized in Table 2-1 and detailed in Appendix B of the Report. 3. Identify all additions to the capital facilities or equipment inventory necessary to maintain the identified levels of service in the area. Then, determine the cost of those additions. This information is detailed in Appendix A. 4. Identify a level of responsibility, meaning the relative need (or as referred to in the accompanying schedules as "PERCENT NEED") for the facility or equipment necessary to accommodate "growth" as defined, and as opposed to current needs. It is often based upon the projects' ability to create additional capacity for the service supported by the infrastructure. In this case additional ability to move more traffic or at a faster pace by adding infrastructure that adds capacity for more daily trip -miles. 5. Distribute the costs identified as a result of development growth on a basis of land use. Costs are distributed between each land use based on its relative use of the capital system. For example, future street costs are distributed to each land use based on its trip -mile generation characteristics. PROPORTIONALITY TEST A test for proportionality is important, if for no other reason than because it attempts to achieve community inter -generational equity, i.e., fairness in balancing the infrastructure investment made by existing residents and businesses with the investment asked of new residents and businesses that will benefit from the existing infrastructure. In short, previous generations of businesses and residents have contributed to the development of the City's existing infrastructure and this fact should be recognized by future residents and businesses by contributing a like (but no more than) amount towards completing the various infrastructure systems. 3 It is one thing to identify the many public improvement projects needed through build- out. It is an entirely different thing to assume that all of the identified improvements are required to meet the demands of the new development. Clearly, some projects are replacements of the existing infrastructure while others are capacity increasing projects. Within the category of the latter, they may also be further classified into two categories; 1. Projects dealing with existing deficiencies, i.e., projects required regardless of whether there is additional development or not. An example would be an intersection widening project to address a currently deficient LOS. An additional example would be the replacement of an existing, but aged facility. 2. Projects required as a result of development. An example of this would be an additional lane at an intersection where traffic flow is currently adequate, but because of projected development, will ultimately need to be required to maintain an acceptable LOS. CHAPTER ORGANIZATION Within the Circulation System Chapter there are three cost/fee tables. They are: The first schedule, 3.1, Allocation of Project Cost Estimates identifies the project, its costs and the relationship, in a percentage, to development. This schedule identifies the street, signal intersection and bridge projects deemed necessary to accommodate the additional trip -miles generated by the remaining development identified by the city's General Plan. The projects are also necessary to eliminate the reduction in the existing circulation system Level of Service (LOS). "Marginal Needs -based Impact Fee - This schedule will identify the impact fees that would need to be adopted to meet the basic capital needs identified in the Report (on the first schedule at the end of the Chapter, i.e., 3.2) for that infrastructure. Existing Commitment or "Equity -based Impact Fee - This schedule will identify the cost (in current nominal dollar value) of the existing infrastructure, including land, physical improvements and capital equipment. This is the average amount that has been "invested" by the current community of residents and businesses. This equity will be expressed in terms of the cost to construct or acquire the assets at current costs. 0 If the average "equity" (for detached dwellings for example) on this Table is greater then the average cost on the previous "Marginal Needs" Table, then the infrastructure system is "front -ended" or has excess capacity. Earlier residents and businesses of the community have put more of the system into place than will the remaining un -built portions of the community, (as they build). The existing community has advanced money to build capacity into the infrastructure system to meet the needs of residents and businesses not yet there. Adoption of this level of impact fee would allow the City to claim that new development is not being required to pay to eliminate existing deficiencies. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS The undeveloped/underdeveloped land use inventory forms the base for distribution of the estimated costs of impacts from new development. The developed land inventory forms the base for distributing the cost of the existing infrastructure for comparison and for the de facto identification of the existing levels of service (LOS) provided by those existing infrastructure. Land Use Definitions. This Report classifies properties as either one of five residential land uses or several different categories of business development. These land uses are defined below: Residential Land Uses include: Low Density, Medium Density, Apartments, Mobile Homes and Elderly Residential housing units. These developments will be addressed in terms of dwelling units (DU). Commercial Lodging includes hotel, motel and business suites. These developments will be considered in terms of rooms. Business/Commerce Land Uses include: Restaurants, Regional Commercial, General Commercial, General/Medical Office, Industrial and Warehouse uses. These developments will be considered per thousand square feet (TSF). Specific/Unusual Uses include: Hospital uses (beds), Commercial Recreational (acres), Newport Dunes (acres) Tennis Clubs (courts) and marina (slips). The Land -use Database is included in Table 2-1, and provides an inventory of all private land uses contained within the current City limits. These figures are based on the General Plan's land use inventory and a staff analysis of privately held parcels. The detailed land -use database can be found in Appendix B at the end of the Report. 5 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS City staff has identified just over $364.4 million in needed and desired Circulation System capital improvement projects required through the City's General Plan build -out, including both projects related to existing deficiencies and those needed solely to support future growth. Based on these costs and the schedules found at the end of each of the remaining chapters of this Report, the portion of the total costs attributable to future development ($179,287,445) were derived on a per unit basis for residential land uses and on a per square foot of pad basis for business land uses. The fees are summarized in Table 2-3, following: Summary of Recommended Circulation System Fair Share Fees Recommended Fair Land Use Share fees Low Density Residential $12,580/Unit Medium Density Residential $9,470/Unit Apartments $9,006/Unit Mobile Homes $6,826/Unit Elderly Residential $8,217/Unit Commercial Lodging $8,347/Unit Restaurants $40.001/S.F. Regional Commercial $20.287/S.F. General Commercial $19.521/S.F. General/Medical Office $19.404/S.F. Industrial Uses $10.120/S.F. Warehouse Uses $8.357/S.F. Hospital Uses $15,412/Bed Commercial Recreational $23,218/Acre No Other Category $3,714/Unit The adoption of the recommended maximum impact fees supported by the calculations in this Report (Schedule 2.1) would raise some $179.3 million (49.19%). Existing fund balances of $595,000 will finance 0.16% of the needs. However, if this Fair Share Fee schedule is adopted, an additional $184.6 million in other revenue/capital sources would need to be found, many of which have been identified on the individual Master Facilities Plan project detail pages. A combination of Gas Tax, Measure M and Proposition 42 revenues will be used to address this shortfall. However, a number of other projects will remain under funded. Schedule 2.1, identifies the individual and total Fair Share Fee schedule by land - use and provides a calculation of the potential collection through build -out at the proposed Marginal -needs Based Fair Share Fee rates and the cost of the total infrastructure needs, and is the recommended Fair Share Fee schedule for adoption. FORMAT OF THE REPORT The following format of this Report contains the detailed information relative to the calculation of the Circulation System FSF schedule recommended by RCS for the entire City. Appropriate textual explanation is contained within that chapter, with appropriate cost schedules, listed below and three appendices. CHAPTER 3 - Circulation (Major Streets and Bridges) System APPENDIX A - Circulation System Master Facilities Plan APPENDIX B - Detailed Land -use Database APPENDIX C - Detail of Trip -miles by Land -use ISSUES RAISED AND CONSIDERED During discussions of the update to the Fair Share Fee, interested parties identified issues and questions regarding how the fees were going to be calculated. These have been reviewed and discussed and are described below. A. Banning Ranch roadways — considerable discussion has occurred due to the uncertainty of future development in this area and the amount of roadway construction needed. The General Plan has a preferred use of the area as Open Space while the owners of the property have presented the City a conceptual development program. The Circulation Element of the General Plan includes several arterial roadways crossing the property and is generally consistent with Orange County Transportation Authority's Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH). 7 A limited circulation system in the Banning Ranch area is included in the Report as detailed on Schedule 3.1. The roadways included are based upon the need for some regional roadway connections regardless of the future use of the property. Failure to provide these connections results in the need for additional improvements along Coast Highway between the Santa Ana River and Newport Boulevard. Considering that there may be some level of development on the property as well as other properties nearby, assumptions have been made regarding the percentage of use that would be regional in nature and the costs reflect those percentages. For example the extension of 15th Street from its current terminus to Bluff Road is listed on Schedule 3.1 but none of the cost is included in the FSF. Another example is the extension of 19th Street across the Santa Ana River which is included with one-quarter of the cost included in the FSF. Adjustments to the Fair Share Fee can be made, if necessary, at such time as decisions have been made by the City Council about the level of development and the selected roadway network. B. Regional need — This analysis considers what percentage of the needed improvement costs should be borne by development as well as the share to be funded by other programs available to the City such as Measure M, Gas Tax, etc. As noted on Schedule 3. 1, the FSF is anticipated to cover just over 49% of the total cost with the remainder coming from other sources. C. Pedestrian improvements — The level of pedestrian improvements has been scaled back to less than half of that initially proposed to be included in the FSF program. Additionally only 50% of those improvements are included in the FSF in recognition of the benefit of such improvements to the existing community. Vehicular traffic flow will improve where pedestrian crossings can be removed by way of an overcrossing or controlled by an enhanced crossing that can be coordinated with adjacent traffic signals. D. Right of Way valuation — The estimates used include the acquisition of right of way where required to construct the needed improvements. A value of $100 per square foot was used. Discussions with a qualified appraiser have validated this as a reasonable value. In many cases only a small area of land is needed, but the impact on the remainder property can be significant and the property owner must be compensated for this impact. This results in the price per square foot being much greater than the value of just the land. N E. Contingency costs - The construction estimates include contingency costs for unforeseen work along with costs for design and construction engineering expressed as a percentage of the expected construction costs. These percentages have been analyzed and are felt to be realistic for the overall level of information available at this time. Prepared by: Director Department Attachments: 1. Circulation System Master Facilities Plan and Fair Share Fee Calculation and Nexus Report 2. Master Plan of Streets and Highways 3. Improvement Plans and Estimates (Committee only) D Circulation System Master Facilities Plan and Fair Share Fee Calculation and Nexus Report for the City of Newport Beach, California June, 2008 Copyright, 2006, 2007 & 2008 by Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L. C. All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means -- graphic, electronic, mechanical, including any photocopying, recording, taping or taping or information storage and retrieval systems without written permission Of.- Revenue f Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L. C. 1519 East Chapman Avenue, Suite C Fullerton, CA 92831 (714) 992-9020 June 3, 2008 Mr. Homer Bludau City Manager City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 RE: Circulation System Development Impact Fee (DIF) Calculation and Nexus Study Honorable Mayor, Council and City Manager Bludau: The City continues to receive private development proposals for the few remaining vacant parcels and developers wishing to up-size the densities of existing parcels. The City has always absorbed the increased demands for service created by that development and will continue to do so, within the General Plan guidelines. Revenue and Cost Specialists, L.L.C., was contracted to update the existing Circulation System Development Impact Fees, (referred to as Fair Share Fees in Newport Beach) in order to preserve the existing Levels of Service (LOS) currently offered to and enjoyed by (after having have been paid for by) the existing residents and businesses. The construction of these additional projects is necessary to offset the otherwise eventual diminution Levels of Service due to the addition of new residential and business development. of the existing is Study Th calculates the cost of accommodating increased development, by land -useciated with the construction of those development -related projects. , asso The attached calculation and nexus study identifies some $364,441,383 in circulation system capital acquisitions (streets, signals and bridges) required through build -out within the City's boundaries. Approximately 49.4% or $179,287,445 of that total is required to accommodate additional (or increased) lane -mile demand from new development within the City's limits per the land -use database. Approximately $595,000 or 0.2 % of the total would be financed with existing Circulation System Fair Share Fee Fund balance. The remaining 50.4% or $183,960,253, of the total is required to continue to better serve existing development by maintaining or rehabilitating existing facilities and will be financed by other means. The City Council and City staff, responsible for providing services to a continually expanding residential and business community, must recognize that the magnitude of the Fair Share Fees is a direct t function of the $179,287,445 cost of the Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System capital projects required to accommodate new development within the City's limits as identified as capacity increasing. Page 2 06/03/08 Letter to the City of Newport Beach Utilities Staff Adoption of the maximum Fair Share Fee schedule contained herein and imposition upon the remaining development opportunities in the Newport Beach community, could generate approximately $179.3 million in a combination of public improvement dedications and revenues for use on the many capital expansion projects deemed as development -generated. The identification of the $179.3 million in capital infrastructure needs generated by new development is not taken lightly, but must be examined in relation to the cost of the City's existing inventory of circulation (street, signal and bridge) system that a new development project will share in and benefit from, upon approval, construction and finally, occupancy. To offer such a perspective, a major element in this Study is a proportional analysis, or comparison of what is being asked of future residents and businesses, in the form of dedicated public improvements or an in -lieu (impact fee) payment, with the cost of the City's existing local circulation system infrastructure, contributed by the existing population and business community. The dedications, taxes and assessments contributed to date by the existing community over numerous decades of development have generated (or committed to) just under $1.0 billion (at current replacement costs) in the form of Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System infrastructure improvements from within the City limits. It is not intended for calculated development impact fees to address all of the City's capital utilities needs, especially replacement of aging generation major streets, signals and bridges. As per California Government Code 66000 et. seq. and common fairness, development impact fees cannot address existing capital deficiencies. The development impact fees will be utilized to meet the needs of the City's growing population and business community. Much of the information required to develop the City's capital costs and existing equity data was generated by Richard M. Edmonston, consultant to the Transportation and Development Department, without whose help and assistance this Study would have been impossible to complete to the degree of accuracy and completeness that it has. We would also like to thank the City's planning staff for their assistance in providing the land -use database included in this Study. The Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fee and Nexus Study is now submitted for your consideration. RCS staff is prepared to assist in increasing the understanding of this very significant part of the City's utility revenue structure. Sincerely, Scott Thorpe, Senior Vice President CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CIRCULATION (streets, signals and bridges) SYSTEM FAIR SHARE FEE CALCULATION/NEXUS STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS Pa e No. Chapter 1 - Background and Introduction ......... . ... . 1 Chapter 2 - Demographics and Findings ...................................... 15 Proposed Fair Share Fee Schedule .......................................... 20 Chapter 3 - Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System ........................ . 21 Appendix A - Master Facilities Plan ......................................... 37 Appendix B - Expanded Land -use Database .................................... 63 Appendix C - Calculation of Trip -miles, by Land -use ............................ . 65 Chapter I Background and Introduction The City of Newport Beach has retained Revenue & Cost Specialists' to update the City's existing Circulation System development impact fees. Continued periodic review and adjustment of the Circulation System development impact fees, such as this effort, is appropriate and warranted to insure that the City collects sufficient monies to construct the additional circulation system infrastructure needed to accommodate new residents and businesses developing in the City. The City has traditionally referred to its Circulation System Development Impact Fees as the Circulation System Fair Share Fees or as occasionally referred to in this Report as the FSF. This Circulation System FSF Calculation Report differs from previous efforts by the City in that it includes a greater amount of detail such as a list of all projects to be financed by the City's Fair Share Fees.' This Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation and Nexus Report and the Master Facilities Plan offer greater information for the Council to make policy decisions, greater understanding by the development community, and an easier tracking (and updating) system for the staff. One additional component of this Report is that it includes a proportional analysis of the infrastructure needs required to support continued development of the City as compared to the existing infrastructure. The addition of the proportional analysis will assist the City Council in adopting a fee structure that recognizes inter -generational equity and increases the lay -person's understanding of what is fair. This Report provides documentation of the City's costs which serve as the basis for calculating Fair Share Fees (FSF). The updated Circulation System Fair Share Fees and related information can be found in Chapter 3 and Appendices A, B and C of this Report. The Master Facilities Plan (Appendix A) containing the specifics about the projects that support the fee calculation is a separate document. RCS has met with City staff from the Public Works - Engineering to review the supporting data which forms the calculation of FSF. The results of this review can be found on the schedules located at the end of each Chapter. Inclusion of the "Proportional Analysis." As stated earlier, this Report includes a proportional analysis. This analysis is intended to recognize and reconcile the difference between the City's desired level of service required of new development, per statements in the various General Plan elements, with that of the de facto or actual level of service provided to the existing community. City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report I Chapter One Background and Introduction This addition will assist the Council in making the difficult policy decisions regarding the required additions of new development. Fair Share Fee Structure. The General Plan provides a range of potential densities for residential development, as such, the FSF for residential uses need to be calculated on a per dwelling unit basis to reflect more accurately the impacts from a specific development. For example, a property zoned as detached dwelling residential development may contain from three to six units per acre. If fees are calculated on an acreage basis, the developer proposing three units per acre will pay the same amount as a developer constructing six units per acre. Similarly, fees are calculated on a square footage basis for commercial and industrial properties to reflect the impacts of different building intensities for this type of development. A second reason for the proposed FSF structure recommended in this Report involves the issue of building expansion or intensification of commercial and industrial areas. For example, if a property owner of commercial or industrial property proposes an expansion to his building, the question exists about how to charge this proposed expansion for its impact on the City's streets, storm drainage system, and other infrastructures. A fee calculated on a building square footage basis will simplify this calculation. CALCULATION OF FAIR SHARE FEES In California, State legislation sets certain legal and procedural parameters for the charging of these fees. This legislation was passed as AB1600 by the California Legislature and is now codified as California Government Code Sections 66000 through 66009. This State law went into effect on January 1, 1989. AB1600 requires documentation of projects to be financed by Fair Share Fees prior to their levy and collection, and that the monies collected actually be committed within five years to a project of "direct benefit" to the development which paid the fees. Many states have such controlling statutes. Specifically, AB1600 requires the following: 1. Delineation of the PURPOSE of the fee. 2. Determination of the USE of the fee. 3. Determination of the RELATIONSHIP between the use of the fee and the type of development paying the fee. City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 2 4. Determination of the relationship between the NEED for the facility and the type of development project. NOTE: Numbers 2 & 4 will be reversed throughout the chapters in this Report because it is apparent that need should be identified before use. 5. Determination of the relationship between the AMOUNT of the fee and the COST of the portion of the facility attributed to the specific development project. This Report, with some additions, utilizes the basic methodology consistent with the above requirements of AB 1600. Briefly, the following steps were undertaken in the calculation of impact fees for the City and are listed below: 1. Define the level of service needed within the General Plan area for each project or acquisition identified as necessary. In some areas, certain statistical measures are commonly used to measure or define an acceptable level of service for a category of infrastructure. Street intersections, for instance, are commonly rated based on a Level of Service scale of "A" to "F" developed by transportation engineers. 2. Review thelan_ d use map and determine the existing mix of land uses and amount of undeveloped and developed land. The magnitude of growth and its impacts can thus be determined by considering this land use data when planning needed infrastructure. The inventory can be found summarized in Table 2-1 and detailed in Appendix B. 3. Identify all additions to the capital facilities or equipment inventory necessary to maintain the identified levels of service in the area. Then, determine the cost of those additions. This information is detailed in Appendix A. 4. Identify a level of responsibility, identifying, as termed in this Report, the relative need (or as referred to in the accompanying schedules as "PERCENT NEED") for the facility or equipment necessary to accommodate "growth" as defined, and as opposed to current needs. It is often based upon the projects ability to create additional capacity for the service supported by the infrastructure. In this case additional ability to move more traffic or at a faster pace by adding infrastructure that adds capacity for more daily trip -miles. 5. Distribute the costs identified as a result of development growth on a basis of land use. Costs are distributed between each land use based on their City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 3 Chanter One Background and Introduction relative use of the capital system. For example, future street costs are distributed to each land use based on their trip -mile generation characteristics. OTHER ASSUMPTIONS OF THE REPORT In addition to the land use assumptions contained in the next Chapter of this Report, other important assumptions of this study include the following: "Normal" Subdivision Improvements Omitted. Not included in either of the project lists or consequent calculations are the "local" public improvements generally associated with and identi- fied as being the sole responsibility of the developer through the subdivision or development review process. This type of "on site" improvement would include all capital construction within the boundaries of any development, such as street lights, curb, gutter, sidewalks and neighborhood streets and fully adjacent arterial roadways'. These improvements would continue to be the direct responsibility of the developer, with or without the addition of Fair Share Fees, Land Costs. Land acquisition cost estimates were developed after discussions with City officials. Arguments for higher or lower costs can be made; however, the herein contained per acre amounts appear to be the appropriate current figure for the purposes of this study. Specific costs have been added for differing projects. Land costs for past dedicated rights-of-way have been included at a nominal $15.00 per square foot. Right-of-way costs for future projects have been included at $100.00 per square foot'. "Zone -based" Fees for FSF In some categories of infrastructure, primarily hard infrastructure, the FSF may need to recognize subregion or smaller portions of the City with extraordinary service costs or infrastructure needs. Subregions are generally the result of some geographical feature such as a river or hilly terrain that creates a differing need for infrastructure in the subregion. As an example, a reservoir that must be built at substantial costs to allow a small area of the City, above the current level of other reservoirs, to be developed, while there is no benefit to any other area of the City would be a prime example. A specific overlay or surcharge fee may be necessary in order to eliminate the possibility of others who will not receive any benefit from the reservoir from being required to assume responsibility for payment of that reservoir. However, given the size of the City, no zone have been identified. Exclusion of Tax "Credits" for Undeveloped Land. It has been argued by some that a credit for capital -related revenues, such as gas taxes, should be made against the Fair Share Fees calculated or imposed by a city. Using the state gas tax as an example, proponents of a FSF credit argue that a city will receive increased annual gas taxes because of the additional population generated by future residential development. It is therefore argued that a developer should receive a credit for City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 4 any associated gas tax revenues collected as a result of the residents or businesses that occupy the new dwellings against any Circulation System Fair Share Fee imposed by the City based on either of two separate arguments. The first argument for a gas tax credit supposes that the additional gas taxes created by residential development are used to pay for the maintenance of existing streets, which is the responsibility of existing development. Since the new streets constructed via development impact fees will not require rehabilitation or reconstruction for another 10 to 20 years, the gas tax generated by new development is therefore a windfall to the City and should be credited against the FSF. What this argument fails to consider is that any new resident or business to the City will begin to contribute immediately to the use and deterioration of all City streets. A cursory review of City finances will reveal that the portion of the State gas tax received by cities falls far short of meeting the City's needed street improvements and repairs in any given year. The gas taxes "generated" by new development simply cannot meet the maintenance costs of either the new streets associated with the development or the existing streets which the new resident uses on a daily basis. The second argument proposes that the developer pays his "full share" of constructing new roads when he pays the City's Circulation System FSF and that the gas taxes generated by his development are unfairly used to make improvements to the existing street system. It is the experience of most municipal agencies that gas taxes are barely adequate to meet streets -related operational costs, and if they are sufficient to meet these costs, the remainder is used for capital - related maintenance projects. Certainly, gas taxes fall far short of addressing the annual depreciation, at roughly $20 million per year, based upon a roughly $1.0 billion replacement value and a fifty year useful lifetime. As a result, the amount of gas tax revenues used for expansion of the existing street system is usually, and specifically in Newport Beach's case, a very nominal amount of the total. For these reasons, a credit is not considered for Circulation FSF in this Report. Financin Costs Since financing costs reflect an actual, and generally significant, outlay of funds for an agency, they are included in the project costs where debt financing is required due to the infrastructure and insure that new development also pays its immediacy of the need for the facility or infrastructure to show the full costs of such facility or service is a reasonable cost of construction of many, but not ne"fair share" of these costs. Debt cessarily all, public faciliti infrastructure. FSF are collected in incremental amounts, but faes and cilities are not expanded ti those same incremental amounts. However, financing would only be included for facilities where, based upon staff's estimate, the immediacy of need for the facility requires debt financing and no project requiring debt service was identified nor included in the Master Facilities Plan. Should such occur, the Fair Share Fees should be recalculated to recognize annual debt payments. City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 5 REQUIRED PROPORTIONALITY TEST A test for proportionality is important, if for no other reason than because it attempts to achieve community inter -generational equity, i.e., fairness in balancing the infrastructure investment made by existing residents and businesses with the investment asked of new residents and businesses that will benefit from the existing infrastructure. In short, previous generations of businesses and residents have contributed to the development of the City's existing infrastructure and this fact should be recognized by future residents and businesses by contributing a like (but no more than) amount towards completing the various infrastructure systems. It is one thing to identify the many public improvement projects needed through build -out. It is an entirely different thing to assume that all of the identified improvements are required to meet the demands of the new development. Clearly, some projects are replacements of the existing infrastructure while others are capacity increasing projects. Within the category of the latter, they may also be further classified into two categories; 1. Projects dealing with existing deficiencies, i.e., projects required regardless of whether there is additional development or not. An examples would be a traffic intersection currently controlled by stop signs that meets traffic warrants for a traffic signal, but is unfunded. An additional example would be the replacement of an existing, but aged facility. 2. Projects that are required as a result of development. An example of this would be an intersection where traffic flow is currently controlled quite adequately by stop signs, but because of development in the near and "downstream" areas, will ultimately need to be signalized. All development impact fee calculations claim to be fair, but few offer actual evidence of such fairness. Most FSF calculations will simply identify the desired or needed capital projects, ostensibly required as a result of the new development. The issue can be difficult and complex. Therefore, what is fair and equitable? Is it fair to require future residents and businesses in a city to construct, via payment of Fair Share Fees, a new police station when the current station is merely rented or leased space? On the other hand, if a community already has all of the parks they will need at build -out, are they precluded from imposing an impact fee to recoup some of the expenses incurred in constructing the maximum needed park improvements prior to the maximum demand? These are difficult questions that may be made clearer and easier by reviewing the following examples. - wttu nxisnntntrastructure. The answer to these difficult questions may best be answered by comparing various infrastructure scenarios. This can be City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 6 Chapter One Background and lntroduct�on accomplished by looking closely at our friends in the planned community of Happy Valleys for a few scenarios to explain the three possible conditions that can occur regarding the agency's current infrastructure and the demand upon them. For purposes of this example, this report will use the provision of fire suppression services, a service that most of us as nonprofessional firefighters can somewhat understand, to identify some of the issues. These three "conditions" include, the fire suppression system infrastructure construction 1. is On -target, 2. has been Deficient, or; 3. has created Excess Service Capacity. Adoption of a Standard - According to the Happy Valley General Plan Public Safety Element fire station planning standards, a basic two -bay fire station (estimated for purposes of this example to cost about $3,000,000) will meet the needs of 5,000 homes or 10,000,000 square feet of business pad. If these standards were adopted as Happy Valley's public safety element of the City's General Plan, they would be known as the de jure or stated (or desired) standard (i.e., the standard the community would like to meet). The inductive impact fees (or cost per proportional unit served) for this de jure standard would then be: Table 1-1 Calculation of Development Impact Cost Land Use Station Cost Units Served Im act Fee Residential Units Business S.F. $3,000,000 $3,000,000 5,000 10,000,000 $600.00 per home $0.30 perS.F. Service Base - Happy Valley's General Plan indicates that there will be 10,000 residential units and about 20,000,000 square feet of commercial/industrial space creating a need for four stations at build -out. The calculation identifying the number of required stations is as follows: City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report Table 1-2 Determination of Required Number of Stations Number I Units served by I Stations Residential Units 10,0005,000 2 Stations Business S.F. 20,000,000 10,000,000 2 Stations Required Stations at General Plan Build -out 4 Stations Infrastructure is "On -target" - The need for four stations appears simple and the Happy Valley Council need only impose the impact fees identified in Table 1-1. Currently, Happy Valley has 6,250 residential units and 7,500,000 square feet of commercial /industrial building pad and is half "built -out" (in terms of fire calls -for -service). The existing development in Happy Valley is generating half of its ultimate (General Plan build -out) fire calls -for -service. This is demonstrated in Table 1-3 following: Table 1-3 Development of Current Infrastructure is "On -Target" NumberUnits served by Stations of Units One Station Re wired Residential Units 6,250 5,000 1.25 Stations Business S.F. 7,500,000 10,000,000 0.75 Stations Total Number of Fire Stations Currently Required 2.00 Stations Conversely, Happy Valley has the remaining half of its fire demand (in terms of calls -for -service) Yet to come. Left to build are 3,750 detached dwelling units and 12,500,000 square feet of business floor space, and when constructed would generate the following capital needs identified on the following Table 1-4: City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 8 Chapter One Background and lntroducnon Table 1-4 Remaining Development and Station Requirement If the earlier calculated impact fees ($600 per residence and $0.30 per square foot of business pad) were adopted and imposed, Happy Valley would collect (by General Plan build -out) enough capital revenues to construct the remaining two stations and proportionality between existing and future residents and businesses would be evident. Table 1-5, following, demonstrates this: Table 1-5 Remaining Development Impact Fee Collection And everyone in the community of Happy Valley is adequately served by the four stations having been financed generally fairly by the total community. Infrastructure is in Deficient Condition - Consider, however, the implications if the current Happy Valley residents and businesses had shown the earlier limited commitment to contribute only enough financing to construct one station when, based upon their own adopted standards and City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report Number Units served by Stations of Units One Station Re uired Residential Units 3,750 5,000 0.75 Stations Business S.F. 12,500,000 10,000,000 1.25 Stations # of New Stations Required from Parcels to be Del— ed 2.00 Stations If the earlier calculated impact fees ($600 per residence and $0.30 per square foot of business pad) were adopted and imposed, Happy Valley would collect (by General Plan build -out) enough capital revenues to construct the remaining two stations and proportionality between existing and future residents and businesses would be evident. Table 1-5, following, demonstrates this: Table 1-5 Remaining Development Impact Fee Collection And everyone in the community of Happy Valley is adequately served by the four stations having been financed generally fairly by the total community. Infrastructure is in Deficient Condition - Consider, however, the implications if the current Happy Valley residents and businesses had shown the earlier limited commitment to contribute only enough financing to construct one station when, based upon their own adopted standards and City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report LV/L level of development, they should have two stations? Clearly three more stations would be needed on the path to General Plan "build -out. " Initially, we can easily dismiss as completely inequitable the possibility of requiring the remaining future home and business owners to finance all three remaining stations. But would it be fair and equitable to charge new residents the $600 per home and new businesses the $0.30 per business square foot in order to build the remaining two stations required to meet the planning standards? The simple and direct answer is no. The Happy Valley community has not (with only one station constructed at half build -out) demonstrated their full and complete commitment to meeting the General Plan Public Safety Element standards, and as a result would not have a strong case to assert that others who build after them need to contribute towards the construction of multiple (two) fire stations at a higher service rate by including the "missing" second station. The service provided by the single existing station is the community's de facto (or "in fact") standard service level. With one station, the contributed equity to build the single station would be half of the impact fee proposed in Table 1-1, or $300/residential unit and $0.15/square foot of business space, respectively as identified in Table 1-6, following. Table 1-6 Impact Fee at Deficient Condition of Units Contribution Number Existingki. Residential Units 3,750 $300.00 Business S.F. 12,500,000 $0.15 Amount Contributed by Existing Community Cost of One New Fire Station Station(s) built with Community's Contribution If Happy Valley has only built one station at half General Plan build -out, we would be forced to conclude that the City is currently deficient by one station. If the future residents were asked to pay at a rate that would build two stations (the $600/$0.30 rates) the City would have three stations at General Plan build -out, one financed and built by the first half of the community, and two financed and built by the second half of the community. The first half of the community City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 10 would, in effect "inherit" one half of a station at no cost to themselves. In short, Happy Valley would fail the proportionality test. The inequity would then be exacerbated when the community decides to build the final "missing" last station (of four) from a City-wide assessment or from annual General Fund receipts, paid for by the entire community, including those who just paid for the two new stations via the adopted fire suppression development impact fees. The only truly and completely e uitable option is for the City to adopt impact fees at the $300/residence and $0.15/square foot rates. Adoption of this fee would be referred to as the Community Financial Commitment or Equity -based Impact Fees. Admittedly, the City will go further into a deficit position in terms of the number of required stations, from being deficient by one station at half General Plan build -out to a deficiency of two stations at General Plan build -out, but the ratio of deficiency (or overall proportionality) would remain a constant 50% of the stations needed at either time. The community, if they are truly serious about meeting the General Plan recommended fire station standard, would then need to assess the entirecommunity to raise the needed money in some fashion for financing the remaining two stations either in the form of he assessment or dedication of general receipts of the City.an Infrastructure - "Excess Capacity" - One final but important scenario remains and must be considered. In this scenario the existing residents of Happy Valley were the industrious sort and (at half General Plan build -out) had constructed three stations when they were at the point when they only needed two stations. Clearly there is excess capacity in each of the three existing stations. In this case, the Happy Valley's current de facto standard would be well above the de jure or target standard. Statistically, each of the three stations would have 1/3 excess capacity (for providing services) and should be busy only about two-thirds of the time. Should the impact fee be limited only to the marginal $300 per residence and $0.15 per business square foot required to construct the one remaining required station? If so, the future residents receive a gift of the extra (third) station. There will be tough decisions ahead to be made by the Happy Valley City Council. Marginal or Recoupment Fee? The Happy Valley City Council should adopt, ata minimum, the $300/residence and $0.15/square foot business space rates to insure that the fourth station would be built. This would be referred to as the marginal needs -based fee. This would be a benevolent gesture, giving the new residents a free ride on the cost of the (already built and paid for) third station. Or in the alternative, the Council can recognize that the $3,000,000 used to build the third station was a loan from the existing community's General Fund receipts, and needs to be repaid by the future community receiving an instantaneous level of fire protection the day they receive their occupancy permit', through the imposition and collection of impact fees.$ In this case, the $600/residence and $0.30/square foot of business space impact fees should be adopted, imposed and collected. The impact fee would accumulate $6,000,000 through build -out, with $3,000,000 City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 11 Chapter One Background and Introduction required to repay the General Fund in delayed revenue (for Station #3) and $3,000,000 necessary to construct the fourth station. This would be referred to as the recoupment -based at General Plan build -out fee. And more importantly, at General Plan built -out, long term equity would be achieved as each home and business would have contributed the same $600 per residence and $0.30 per square foot. Exceptions to Proportionality Test. The previous discussion applies particularly well to above ground or facility -based services such as public -use facilities, pools, police and fire stations, civic centers, maintenance yards or other fixed location and fixed capacity facilities that serve the entire population. However, it does not necessarily work well on ground level or below system infrastructure such as streets, utilities, and storm drainage, where the continuation of a deficient system into the future is not at all possible and the lack of additions would ensure the complete inability to approve any further private construction without creating unsafe conditions to a specific area. As an example, if the agency's storm drainage system is currently deficient and creates some periodic flooding but not necessarily in dangerous amounts, the agency may not be able to approve and allow any more future development unless the storm drainage run-off created by the new development, is properly collected and released at a river or flood control channel. Specific Plan or Benefit to a Specific Area An additional exception occurs when the need or benefit from a specific facility is generated by a finite or easily defined area such as a specific plan or a new area of the agency that is significantly outside of the existing agency's urban in -fill service area or the specific plan is primarily the sole beneficiary of the infrastructure to be constructed. An example may be a small area of the City, proposed for say 2,000 homes, but separate from the rest of the City in such a way that, to meet the General Plan's stated fire suppression standard level of service of a five minute response time, it requires a separate fire station but serving less than any of the other stations, which on average serve 5,000 homes. There is little argument as to why the remaining residents and businesses should not need to finance that higher cost per home served. This is not uncommon in an area geographically separated from the major, or urban, part of the community. An example would be a small area separated by a river or up on a hillside or in a canyon. Density may also be a factor. Fire infrastructure system improvements to date may be spread over a more compact density (say 6-7 homes per acre) than the remaining development in town (say 2-3 homes per acre). Most likely, the expansion of any infrastructure, circulation systems included, will cost more per home for the lower densities and will be far higher than the infrastructure costs required to serve the more compact but higher density homes. Such equity is the attempt of this Report. Excess capacity is often difficult to identify and even more difficult to convince others of. The City is probably much like Happy Valley, with excess or overcapacity in some areas of infrastructure, and perhaps slightly deficient9 in others. City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 12 Chapter One Background and Introduction CHAPTER ORGANIZATION Within the Circulation System Chapter there will be a minimum of three cost/fee tables. They are: The first schedule, 3.1. the Allocation of Project Cost Estimates identifies the project, its costs and the relationship, in a percentage, to development. "Marginal Needs" -based Impact Fee - This schedule will identify the impact fees that would need to be adopted to meet the basic capital needs identified in the Report (on the first schedule at the end of the Chapter, i.e., 3.2) for that infrastructure. With adoption of this level of impact fees, one could claim that new development is occurring without any additional cost to the existing residents and businesses. You could not, however, claim that new development is paying its `fair share." Existing Commitment or "Equity" -based Impact Fee - This schedule will identify the cost (in current nominal dollar value) of the existing infrastructure, including land, physical improvements and capital equipment. This is the average amount that has been" invested "by the current community of residents and businesses. This equity will be expressed in terms of the cost to construct or acquire the assets at current costs. If the average "equity" (for detached dwellings for example) on this Table is greater then the average cost on the previous "Marginal Needs" Table, then the infrastructure system is "front - ended" or has excess capacity. Earlier residents and businesses of the community have put more of the system into place than will the remaining unbuilt portions of the community, (as they build). The existing community has advanced money to build capacity into the infrastructure system to meet the needs of residents and businesses not yet there! The scenario where Happy Valley had already built three fire stations while it only had the current demands for two stations is an good example of a front -ended system. Adoption of this level of impact fee would allow the City to claim that new development is not being required to pay to eliminate existing deficiencies. [This space left to place the Chapter endnotes on a single page]. City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 13 Chapter One Background and Introduction CHAPTER ENDNOTES 1. The firm had been previously known as Management Services Institute, but the same partners reorganized as Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. 2. For greater detail of each project, refer to the City's Master Facilities Plan (Appendix A). 3. Public agencies are authorized to require such improvements under the Subdivision map Act. 4. This land -acquisition value has been determined by the City's circulation system consultant that prepared the cost estimates and then confirmed by a local commercial real estate appraiser. 5. Examples using other infrastructure will be used from time to time in this report, though pages 6 through 12 are limited to Fire Suppression Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment. 6. "Happy Valley" has been used as an imaginary community for purposes of DIF example for about fourteen years. Clearly no insult is intended to any real or imagined community of Happy Valley. It is also a Happy Valley because there is no inflation and the value of a dollar remains nominal. 7. Actually, the perm tted structure receives fire protection services as it being constructed. 8. This example assumes that each of the existing three stations is debt -free and owned out -right. 9. Not necessarily in a manner that indicates a danger, just below the standard being asked of the future residents. City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 14 Chapter 2 Demographics and Findings This Chapter provides an inventory of existing development and remaining development opportunities within the City and presents a summary of recommended Fair Share Fees detailed in the following chapter of this Report. The City still possesses a few sizeable areas of vacant land zoned for residential, commercial lodging, business and special uses. The City also anticipates redevelopment will occur in some of the currently developed area. In some cases this redevelopment, or up-sizing is expected to be more traffic intensive than the use it replaces which will add to the demand for increased roadway (trip -mile) capacity. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS The undeveloped/underdeveloped land use inventory forms the base for distribution of the estimated costs of impacts from new development. The developed land inventory forms the base for distributing the cost of the existing infrastructure for comparison and for the de facto identification of the existing levels of service (LOS) provided by those existing infrastructure. Land Use Definitions. This Report classifies properties as either one of five residential land uses or several different categories of business development. These land uses are defined below: ' *Residential Land Uses include: Low Density, Medium Density, Apartments, Mobile Homes and Elderly Residential housing units. These developments will be costed in terms of complete residential units. • Commercial Lodging includes hotel, motel and business suites. These developments will also be calculated in terms of units. • Business/Commerce Land Uses include: Restaurants, Regional Commercial, General Commercial, General/Medical Office, Industrial and Warehouse uses. These developments will be costed in terms of square feet. • Specific/Unusual Uses include: Hospital uses (beds), Commercial Recreational (acres), Newport Dunes (acres) Tennis Clubs (courts) and marina's (slips). City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 15 Chanter 2 Demographics and Findings Table 2-1, following, provides an inventory of all private land uses contained within the current City limits. These figures are based on the General Plan's land use inventory and a staff analysis of privately held parcels.' The detailed land -use database can be found in Appendix B at the end of the Report. Table 2-1 Detailed Land Use Inventory Total - Entire City Existing Anticipated Total G.P. Deuel�pment Development Development # of Urtits # of Units # of Units Low Density Residential 18,702 1,321 20,023 Medium Density Residential 10,974 4,696 15,670 Apartments 9,703 5,374 15,077 Mobile Homes 600 (145) 455 Elderly Residential 200 120 320 Commercial Lodging 3,365 2,221 5,586 Restaurants 115,090 57,760 172,850 Regional Commercial 1,331,000 288,5251117 General Commercial 4,098,787 1,600,397 General/Medical Office 13,129,386 385,720 Industrial Uses 1,291,079 (143,630) Warehouse Uses 196,420 1,000 Hospital Uses (beds) 1,692 377 Comm. Recreational (acres) 69 0 No Other Category (units) 1,115 2 Definitions of Land Use Status. For each of the major land use categories detailed above, land is categorized as either Developed or Undeveloped. Definitions regarding the status of each land use are as follows: Existing Development (# of Units) - Includes land in the City which is fully developed and is in conformance with the zoning designation for that area, or land which has received a building permit but which is not yet constructed. Units in this category may also include non -conforming use areas of the City which contain extensive development prior to annexation or before changes to the General Plan were made. Anticipated Development (# of Units) - Refers to all non-public vacant acreage located within the City. This category also includes any largely vacant properties anticipated to be redeveloped in the future. -11y ui ivewport rseacn circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 16 Chapter 2 Demoeraphics and Findines SUMMARY OF FINDINGS City staff has identified just over $364.4 million in needed and desired Circulation System capital improvement projects required through the City's General Plan build -out, including both projects related to existing deficiencies and those needed solely to support future growth. Based on these costs and the schedules found at the end of each of the remaining chapters of this Report, the portion of the total costs attributable to future development ($179,287,445) were derived on a per unit basis for residential land uses and on a per square foot of pad basis for business land uses. The fees are summarized in Table 2-3, following: Table 2-3 Summary of Recommended Circulation System Fair Share Fees Recommended Fair Land Use Share Fees Low Density Residential $12,580/Unit Medium D nsity Residential $9,470/Unit A artments $9,006/Unit Mobile Homes $6,826/Unit Elderl Residential $8,217/Unit Commercial Lodging $8,347/Unit Restaurants $40.001/S.F. Re ional Commercial $20.287/S.F. General Commercial $19.521/S.F. General/Medical Office $19.404/S. F. Industrial Uses $10.120/S.F. Warehouse Uses $8.357/S.F. Hos ital Uses $15,412/Bed Commercial Recreational $23,218/Acre No Other Cate or. $3,714/Unit City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 17 Chapter 2 Demographics and Findus The adoption of the recommended maximum impact fees supported by the calculations in this Report (Schedule 2.1) would raise some $179.3 million (49.19%). Existing fund balances of $595,000 will finance 0.16 % of the needs. However, if this Fair Share Fee schedule is adopted, an additional $184.6 million in other revenue/capital sources would need to be found, many of which have been identified on the individual Master Facilities Plan project detail pages. A combination of Gas Tax, Measure M and Proposition 42 revenues will be used to address this shortfall. However, a number of other projects will remain underfunded. Schedule 2. 1, identifies the individual and total Fair Share Fee schedule by land -use and provide a calculation of the potential collection through build -out at the proposed Marginal -needs Based Fair Share Fee rates and the cost of the total infrastructure needs, and is the recommended Fair Share Fee schedule for adoption. FORMAT OF THIS REPORT The following format of this Report contains the detailed information relative to the calculation of the Circulation System FSF schedule recommended by RCS for the entire City. Appropriate textual explanation is contained within that chapter, with appropriate cost schedules, listed below and three appendices. CHAPTER 3 - Circulation (Major Streets and Bridges) System APPENDIX A - Circulation System Master Facilities Plan APPENDIX B - Detailed Land -use Database APPENDIX C - Detail of Trip -miles by Land -use NOTE REGARDING TEXTUAL MATHEMATICS: It is important to note that the use of a computer provides for calculations to a large number of decimal points. Such data, when included in text and supporting textual tables, has been rounded to no more than two decimals for clarity and thus may not replicated to the necessary degree of accuracy as the spreadsheet schedules at the end of each chapter. Should there be any difference between tables within a chapter and the schedules at the end of the same chapter, the schedules shall prevail. City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 18 Chanter 2 Demographics and Findings CHAPTER ENDNOTES 1. City of Newport Beach General Plan Transportation Study City Council Adopted land Use Scenario; Table 1. 2. The figures are consistent with the most recent Land Use Element. "ty uj vewporr tseacrl Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 19 Schedule 2.1 City of Newport Beach 2007-08 Development Impact (Fair Share) Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Impact Fee Summary and Potential Collection Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Potential Fee per Potential Land Use Units/S.F. Unit nr S F oo„e ,. �11UUjdjJon system Uevelopment Impact Fee Revenue $179 286 845 Total Build -out" Circulation System Infrastructure Needs Less Existing Development Impact Fee Fund Balance (None) $364,441 ,383 ; Net Circulation System Infrastructure Needs ($595,000) $363,846,383 Amount to be Financed by Other City Revenue Sources ($184,559.538) Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 20 Chapter 3 Circulation System (Streets, Signals and Bridges) The following Chapter will discuss the circulation improvements planned for the City through build -out of the City's corporate limits as identified in the Land -use Database Table in Chapter 2. The Existing System. The City currently has and maintains an extensive system of roadways available for transportation of goods and services, as well as for educational, recreational, and social purposes. Streets that fall under the jurisdiction of the City of Newport Beach would be typically classified as one of five common types of roadways (excludes "locals"), The City's General Plan Circulation Element Roadway Classification System specifically contains these various roadway type definitions' and they are generally described as: • Principal Arterial - A Principal arterial highway is typically an eight lane divided roadway. A Principal arterial is designed to accommodate a daily capacity ranging from 60,000 to 73,000 with a typical daily capacity of 68,000 vehicle per day (VPD). Principal arterials carry a large volume of regional through traffic not handled by the freeway system. • Major Arterial - A Major arterial highway is typically a six -lane divided roadway. A Major arterial is designed to accommodate a daily capacity ranging from 45,000 to 67,000 with a typical daily capacity of 51,000 vehicles per day. Major arterials carry a large volume of regional through traffic not handled by the freeway system. A Major Augmented is similar to a Major arterial, but may include additional lanes, particularly at intersections, resulting in a daily capacity ranging from 52,000 to 70,000 with a typical daily capacity of 58,000 vehicle per day. • Primary Arterial - A Primary arterial highway is usually a four -lane divided roadway. A Primary arterial is designed to accommodate a daily capacity ranging from 30,000 to 45,000 with a typical daily capacity of 34,000 (VPD). A Primary arterial's function is similar to that of a Principal or Major arterial. The chief difference is capacity. A Primary Augmented is similar to a Primary arterial, but may include additional lanes, particularly at intersections, resulting in a daily capacity ranging from 35,000 to 50,000 with a typical daily capacity of 40,000 vehicle per day. • Secondary Arterial - A Secondary arterial highway is a four lane roadway (often divided). A Secondary arterial distributes traffic between local streets and Major or Primary arterials. Although some Secondary arterials serve as through routes, most provide more direct access City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 21 Chapter 3 Circulation (Streets Signals and Bridges) System to surrounding land uses than Principal, Major, or Principal arterials. Secondary arterials carry a daily capacity ranging from 20,000 to 30,000 with a typical daily capacity of 23,000 VPD. • Commuter Roadway - A Commuter roadway is a two -to -four lane unrestricted access roadway with a daily capacity ranging from 7,000 to 11,000 with a typical daily capacity of 10,000 VPD. It differs from a local street in its ability to handle through traffic movements between arterials. The regional arterials, major arterials, primary arterials, secondary arterials and commuter roadways are the focus of this Chapter. Local streets are not included as they are generally constructed within the footprint of the development and serve that development and then are merely dedicated to the City after completions and inspection. Freeways are also not included as they are the responsibility of CALTRANS. Demand Upon Infrastructure Created by the Development of Undeveloped Parcels. Undeveloped parcels create few trip -miles beyond an occasional visit to the site for weed abatement purposes, planning purposes or to consider a sale or development of the vacant parcel. None of these trip - ends are on a routine basis. However, a developed parcel will generate a statistically predictable amount of trip -ends and trip -miles, depending upon the specific land use of the development. Thus it can be stated that a vacant parcel, when developed into a specific use, i.e., residential or business, will generate more traffic than it did when it was vacant. Similarly, a change in the use of the property may also increase the number of trip -ends, i.e., the demolition of a low trip - generating insurance office into reconstruction as a new high trip -mile generating fast-food restaurant. All new development contributes to cumulative traffic impacts, which are difficult to measure and mitigate on a project -by -project, basis but which have significant and widespread cumulative impacts on the City's existing road system. Factors that will increase the competition for existing lane miles existing in the City include the following: • The construction of private business uses currently identified as undeveloped will generate 110,430 new (net) daily trip -miles, just over 28.6% of the total new trip -miles expected at General Plan build -out. This figure could vary significantly depending upon the type of business uses constructed and possible zoning changes or conditional use permits issued. • An increase in the City's full-time population through the construction of about 11,366 additional dwelling units contributing approximately 235,845 new trip -miles daily or just over 6 1. 1 % of the newly expected daily trip -miles. City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 22 Chapter 3 Circulation (Streets Signals and Bridges) System • The addition of some 2,221 commercial lodging units (hotel/motel rooms) will increase traffic trip -miles by 39,934 trip -miles, or about 10.3% of the anticipated new daily trip -miles. When all (or most) of the available vacant land in the City is developed, the City can expect an additional 386,209 daily trip -miles. For perspective, the City currently experiences approximately 1,881,341 daily trip -miles from the existing residences and businesses. The roughly 386,209 newly anticipated trip -miles represents an over 20% increase over the current 1,881,341 daily trip - miles. While the City is faced with a sizable increase in the number of daily trip -miles at build- out, it should also be noted that there are few remaining opportunities to construct additional lane miles (and controlling signals) to be added to the existing arterial/collector lane -miles to mitigate the 20% expected increase in lane -mile demand. There are currently 388.4 lane miles of major roadways that support the existing 1,881,341 daily trip -miles. To retain full proportionality, the City would need to construct an additional 79.7 lane miles. Unfortunately, there is not the opportunity to construct an additional 79.7 lane miles. The Fair Share Fees program projects (as summarized and attached in Appendix A) would facilitate the construction of an additional roughly 10.4 lane miles. The remaining circulation system projects are a mix of circulation improvements intended to maintain or improve the traffic -carrying capabilities of the existing system. When lane -miles are no longer an option, all capital efforts that can increase the carrying capacity of the existing lane -miles, such as overpasses, cross -walk alternatives must be undertaken. Barring some of the improvements which would be constructed regardless of development, the existing system is generally capable of serving the existing demand on the circulation system. The Purpose of the Fee. In the City, many of the planned arterials and collectors exist in some form, perhaps not yet fully widened to allow for the full number of lanes. Thus the collection of circulation system impact fees would be used to finish off these existing, but, uncompleted, or not yet maximized roads. The same can be said for overpasses, a number of which are included on the list to be completed to their maximum planned width, again maximizing the carrying capacity. Additionally, the fees would be used to complete the system of signals that insures the smooth movement of vehicles through intersections. Included are circulation projects needed to alter existing major roadways that currently exist, but due to additional trip -ends are becoming ineffective at moving vehicles. An example would be the final widening of Jamboree Road and Bristol Street (ST -10). This project is required because additional citizens and business -owners will use the existing streets along with the current users rendering it, again, ineffective at moving traffic at a reasonable pace, primarily during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours of traffic. While it is quite impractical to widen many of the existing roadways, acceptable traffic pace may be attainable through a combination of turn lane channelization and signal improvements. City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 23 Chapter 3 Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Again, given the magnitude of growth projected in this Report, numerous intersection improve- ments and construction of new traffic signals will also be needed to avoid congestion and gridlock in the future. Traffic planners have long known that the critical constraint in a typical roadway network is usually not the roadway itself but the intersections. While the street capacity may be theoretically adequate to carry traffic volumes at build -out, motorists may experience congestion at the intersections of the street. While the City of Newport Beach will certainly undertake a significant number of major street widening projects, an equally important component of traffic circulation is the alteration of traffic signals to add additional through -lanes at critical intersections in the City. The City's total Master Facilities Plan Circulation System improvements section identified twenty- four general circulation system projects covering the City with an estimated cost of $364,441,383 or a net $363,846,383 after the existing Circulation System Fair Share Fee Fund balance of $595,000 is subtracted. Each of the projects will increase some capacity to a circulation system to meet the overall 20%increase in major lane mile capacity needs. The individual projects and costs are identified on Schedule 3.1 at the end of the Chapter and detailed in Appendix A. The Use of the Fee. The collection of a Circulation System Fair Share Fee would be used to construct the projects (or portions of projects) identified in Schedule 3.1 at the conclusion of this Chapter's text. The collected fees will be used to create additional lane and bridge miles with which to accommodate the additional 386,209 additional daily trip -miles expected from full General Plan build -out development of the City. Where the amount of equity of the existing community is larger than the basic needs -based impact fee, there is the argument that the difference between the two, for advancement of the system, could be recouped and returned to the General Fund as repayment from the developing properties for the creation of the excess capacity from previous General Fund proceeds or previous exactions and impact fees. Such is the case with the circulation system infrastructure. However, to make such findings a commercial appraisal of the existing assets and the determination of specific excess capacity projects would likely be necessary. The following table (3-1) identifies some of the key system attributes of the circulation improvements system. The attributes identify that approximately 83.0 % of the total trip miles at General Plan "build -out" are represented by the existing community who have contributed a marginally larger percentage (84.7 %) of the cost of the entire system, also at General Plan "build- out". This would indicate that the City is generally and proportionally "on -target" in terms of the construction of the entire circulation system infrastructure. It is a very short leap away to assume that the remaining 17.0% of the traffic trip -mile generators should contribute the financing necessary to construct the remaining 15.3% lane miles, signalized intersections and bridge improvements. City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 24 Chapter 3 Circulation (Streets Signals and Bridges) System Table 3-1 Comparison of Transportation System Attributes Infrastructure Factor Existing Community Future CommunityBuildout Total at Number of Tri -miles 1,881,341 386,209 2,267,550 Percentage of Total $3.0% .17.0% . 100.0% Cost of Total System $179,287,445 $1,173,063,955 PenTotal [:=� 15.3% 100.0% The .Relationship Between the Need for the Fee and the Type of Development Project. Schedule 3.1 identifies the additional traffic demand to be generated by new development, by type of development. The Newport Beach Traffic Model, version 3.1 (NBTM) was the source for the trip - end component utilized in the nexus calculation used to distribute the development -related capital costs. These trip -ends were developed by Urban. Crossroads, Incorporated in 2003 and are also used to identify needed circulation improvements as part of the recent General Plan update. As an example, a 200 -unit low density detached dwelling unit residential specific plan would generate about 5,420 daily trip -miles' and a ten -acre commercial -retail development would generate 4,578 daily trip -miles'. Each would pay its proportionate share of the total 386,209 newly created the City trip -miles expected at General Plan build -out. In the case of the residential detached dwelling development, the daily trip -miles generated by the 200 new homes represents about 1.40% of the total 386,209 new trip -miles anticipated at build -nut, thus they would be required to pay or construct projects on. the Iist to an amount equal to 1.40% of the total development -related project costs. The ten acre commercial development would generate 1.23% of the additional trip -miles and thus would be responsible for 1..23 % of the remaining circulation system project costs. Circulation System Cost Distribution by Average Land Use Trip Frequency and Distance New Trip Adjustment for Pass -by or Diverted Trips Appendix C identifies adjustments to new total trip -ends. As an example, an acre of general commercial use would be expected, on average, to generate about 475.89 trip -ends daily4. However, approximately 1.5 % of those trip - ends, or about 71.4 trip -ends per day, arc pars -by trip -ends, that is, the trip -end is not truly an City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation .Report 25 Chapter 3 Circulation (Streets Signals and Bridges) System end but is actually one in a series of stops, i.e. at various commercial establishments, with a different location such as a residence as the final trip -end or destination of the series of trip -ends. In order to be considered a pass -by trip, the location of the stop must be contiguous to the generators route, i.e. the route that would have been used even if the stop had not been made. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) indicates that: Pass -by trips are attracted from passing the site on an adjacent street or road -way that offers direct access to the generator. Pass -by trips are not diverted to/from another roadway.' Pass -by trip -ends are fully adjusted (reduced at 100%) from the average trip -ends (per day) generated by the fifteen land uses identified in Schedules 3.2 and 3.3 (see also Appendix Q. A diverted trip is similar to a pass -by trip -end in that it is an extra stop between, as an example, a motorists's work site and his or her residence. The diverted trip differs slightly from the pass -by trip in that it requires a minor deviation from the normal generator route and the temporary stop. In short, a diverted trip creates a separate side trip using additional (and different) lane miles from that of the normal route from the motorist's place of employment and his or her home. These trips increase the traffic volume from the generator route, but only for brief distances. The ITE states that diverted trips: are attracted from traffic volume on roadways within the vicinity of the generator (route) but require a diversion from that roadway to another roadway to gain access to the site. These trips could travel on highways or freeways adjacent to the generator, but without access to the generator. Diverted linked trips add traffic to streets adjacent to a site, but may not add traffic to the area's major travel routes.R These diverted trips will be adjusted (reduced at 50%) from the full trip count for each of the land uses identified in Chapter 2. The ITE also indicates that "both pass -by and diverted linked trips may be a part of a multiple -stop chain of trips".' Again, the schedule identified as Appendix C indicates the total trip -ends and the reduction due to the number pass -by trips (at 100%) and diverted trips (at 50%). The trip pass -by and diversion percentages were generated and are supported by a study conducted by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) in conjunction with various U.S. and California agencies.10 Additionally, the same SANDAG data schedule referenced above provides information for a trip distance factor component to the nexus. Based upon that data, a trip to an industrial work -site has the greatest distance at 9.0 miles. A residential trips averages 7.9 miles, a trip from a hotel or motel (once in lodging) averages 7.6 miles and an average trip to a commercial site is the lowest City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 26 Chapter 3 Circulation (Streets Signals and Bridges) Svstem and varies from 2.8 to 3.6 miles. This indicates, as one might conclude from his or her own experiences, that drivers are generally willing, or have to, to travel further distances to employment than they are to shop. Both frequency (trip -ends) and distance (average miles per trip) have been combined into the nexus by multiplying frequency times distance for a total demand factor. The Relationship Between the Use of the Fee and the Type of Development Paying the Fee. There is very little difference between this and the above category. The fee collected will be based on the projected number of trip -ends the proposed development will generate in relationship to the total 386,209 additional projected trip -miles at build -out. Any amount imposed as a circulation system improvements Fair Share Fee will be placed in a separate fund (collecting interest), and is to be used only on the projects identified on Schedule 3.1 as development -related. From time to time the City may require an applicant for a private project to construct a street or signal improvement (or portion thereof) that is on the list of required improvements at the end of this Chapter. This method is often undertaken to expedite the project at the request of the applicant/developer. Should the project cost be attributed to development and thus part of the development impact cost calculation, the developer should receive a credit for any monies expended on this required improvement against their circulation improvements impact fee. If one does not already exist, an ordinance addressing the issue of credits should be prepared and added to the Newport Beach Municipal Code. The Relationship Between the Amount of the Fee and the Cost of the portion of the Facility Attributed to the Development Project The calculation of the Circulation System Fair Share Fee is based upon the recognition that differing types of developments generate differing amounts of trips. The fee is based upon the projected number of trips generated by the proposed private development projects. The Fair Share Fee Schedule receipts will be accumulated until they reach the amount that could construct a meaningful project to alleviate or mitigate the demands of those new developments. Table 3-2 on the following page (and summarized from Schedule 3.2), identifies the Marginal Needs -based Circulation System Fair Share Fee Schedule for the City, based upon an estimated cost of $179,880,845 in development -generated required projects. Many of the projects are partially or fully required to accommodate new development. These are attributed 100% to new development and the Fair Share Fees. [This space left vacant to place the following table on a single page]. City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 27 Chapter 3 Circulation (Streets Signals and Bridges) System Table 3-2 Marginal Needs -based Circulation System Fair Share Fees Recommended Fair Land Use Share Fees Low Density Residential $12,580/Unit Medium Density Residential $9,470/Unit A artments $9,006/Unit Mobile Homes $6,826/Unit Elderly Residential $8,217/Unit Commercial Lodging $8,347/Unit Restaurants $40.001/S.F. Regional Commercial $20.287/S.F. General Commercial $19.404/S.F. General/Medical Office $19.120/S. F. Industrial Uses $10.120/S.F. Warehouse Uses $8.357/S.F. Hospital Uses $15,412/Bed Commercial Recreational $23,218/Acre No Other Category $3,714/Unit Alternative Cost Methodology Amore precise calculation of costs for specific types of land uses can be determined by multiplying the average cost per trip -mile of $464.22 by the applicable daily trip -mile rate. The calculation can be found in Schedule 3.2 at the end of the Chapter and applied to Table 3-3 following. These tables list trip -mile rates and costs for various residential, resort, industrial and commercial developments. A fee system based on a lengthy schedule of trip mile rates theoretically provides more accuracy and therefore equity in determining specific uses' impact on the City's circulation system, but at the same time may increase the City's costs to administer the fee. A more extensive listing of traffic generator by land use is available in Trip Generation as published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington D.C. City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 28 Chapter 3 Circulation (Streets Si pals and Brid eg sl System Table 3-3 Marginal Needs -based Fair Share Fees for Specific Land -uses LAND USE Adjusted Average Trip -end Additional Cost per Cost per 1,000 Square $12,580.36 /Unit Tnp ends Distance to Trip Trio mil T t Feet or DweBmg Unit RESIDENT/AL 1 ANTI IICFc < rr A artment P 4.91 7-9 0.5 Residential Low (SFR) 6.86 7.9 0.5 27.10 $464.22 $12,580.36 /Unit Residential Medium (SFR) 5.16 7.9 0.5 20.4 $464.22 $9,470.09 /Unit A artment P 4.91 7-9 0.5 19.4 $464.22 $9,00587 /Unit Mobile Home Dwelling 4.63 79 0.5 18.3 $464.22 $8,49523 /Unit Oderly Residential 4.48 7.9 0.5 177 $464.22 $8,216.69 /Unit RESORT/TOURIST (per Unit or Entry Door); 23.45 4.3 0.5 50.4 $464.22 Hotel All Suites Hotel 6.29 76 0.5 23.9 $464.22 $J1, 094.86 /Room Motel 3.77 Z 6 0.5 14.3 $464.22 $6, 638.35 /Room $5,895.59 /KSF 4' 76 QS 16.5 $464.22 $659.63 /Room INDUSTRIAL /ner 7 7)iArlcsv Shopping Center 7.16 8.8 _............ 31.5 _ d Light Industrial 6.17 9.0 0.5 278 $464.22 $12,905.32 /KSF Inc usGial 5.97 9.0 0.5 26.9 $464.22 $12,487.52 /KSF vcturing 2.73 9.0 0.5 12.3 $464.22 $5,709.9/ /KSF ,using 4.39 9.0 0.5 19.8 $464.22 $9,19/.56 /KSF Facility 2.21 9.0 0.5 9.9 $464.22 $4,595.78 /KSF Office Park 7.42 8.8 0.5 32.6 $46422 $15,]33.57 /KSF Research Park 5.01 8.8 0.5 22.0 $464.22 $10,212.84 /KSF Business Park 9.34 8.8 0.5 41.1 $464.22 $J9,079.44 /KSF Bldg. Materials/Lumber Store 29.35 4.3 0.5 Garden Center 63.1 $464.22 $29,292.28 /KSF Movie Theater 23.45 4.3 0.5 50.4 $464.22 $23,396.69 /KSF Church 2.47 4.3 0.5 5.3 $464.22 $2,460.37 /KSF Medical -Dental Office 5'92 4.3 0.5 12.7 $46422 $5,895.59 /KSF General Office Building 22.21 8.8 0.5 977 $46422 $45,354.29 /KSF Shopping Center 7.16 8.8 0.5 31.5 $464.22 $14, 622.93 /KSF Hospital 30.20 4.3 0.5 64.9 $464.22 $30, /27.88 /KSF Discount Center 11.42 4.3 0.5 24.6 $464.22 $/1,419.81 /KSF High -Turnover Restaurant 62.93 4.3 0.5 1353 $46422 $62,808.97 /KSF Convenience Market 8.90 4.3 0.5 19.1 $464.22 $8,866.60 /KSF Walk-in Bank 43.57 4.3 0.5 93.7 $464.22 $43,497.4/ /KSF 13.97 4.3 0.5 30.064.22 $]3,926.60 /KSF � emuary (per acre) 3.07 4.3 Service Station (only) 109.56 4.3 Service Station & Market 10581 4.3 Service Statlon/MarkeUWash 99.35 4.3 NOTFS. 0.5 6.6 $464.22 0.5 235.61 $464.22 0.5 227.5 $464.22 0.5 213' 6 $46422 $3,063.85 /Acre $109,370.23 /FP/Day $105,6/0.05 /FP/Day $99,157.39 /FP/Day 1. ADT = Avmgm Daify Tfips 2 K = City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair 3. Adjusted for Pass -by and Diverted Trips. Share Fee Calculation Report 29 Chapter 3 Circulation (Streets. Signals and Bridges) System This set of proposed fees would generate the basic needs amount of revenue necessary to construct the needed circulation construction projects based upon a City-wide application. These figures will then be compared to the financial commitment or equity distribution demonstrated by the existing community. The City has a significant inventory of circulation system infrastructure assets that have been acquired or constructed over the life of the City. The assets acquired to date represent the City's attempt to generate the required circulation capacity in a proportional fashion. That is to say, if roughly 75 % of the traffic demand (in daily trip -miles) is represented by the existing community, then at least 75 % of the General Plan circulation system should have been generated also. The City circulation system infrastructure assets consist of (and are not limited to): • The City has 388.4 lane miles of major roadways with a replacement value of approximately $365,330,760, or just under $950,000 million per lane mile. • Seven bridges providing an approximate 1.1 lane miles of major roadway. The bridges, at approximately $350 per square foot for construction costs, have a combined replacement value of approximately $39,705,750. • Sixty-one traffic signals (with signalized intersection improvements) that control traffic on major roadways (as defined earlier in this Chapter). The sixty-one traffic signals and signalized intersections have a replacement value of approximately $45,750.000. • The same 61.41 lane miles of major roadway have required the acquisition of 36,120,000 square feet of right-of-way. At a very conservative $15.00 per square foot (or $653,400/acre), the right -of way would cost $541,800,000. This is the most expensive circulation system asset that the City (and its residents) owns. • The City has $595,000 in existing Fund Balance in the current Circulation System Fair Share Fee Fund. Combined, the five differing types of circulation system assets total just under $993,181,510 at current replacement or acquisition costs. This represents the financial commitment of the existing community. When this total cost of the existing circulation system is distributed over the entire community, it gives us an average cost per new trip -mile. Table 3-4 following, distributes the net $993,181,150 over the existing community, using the identical nexus factor (e.g. trip -miles) used for distribution of future costs, the existing community has contributed the following, on average, by land use: City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 30 Chapter 3 Circulation (Streets Signals and Bridges) System Table 3-4 Existing Community Financial Commitment or Local Circulation System or Equity -based Proportionality Test Recommended Fair Land Use Share Fees Low Density Residential $14,306/Unit Medium Density Residential $10,769/Unit Apartments $10,241/Unit Mobile Homes $7,760/Unit Elderly Residential $9,344/Unit Commercial Lodging $9,492/Unit Restaurants $45.489/S.F. Regional Commercial $23.070/S.F. General Commercial $22.199/S.F. General/Medical Office $22.067/S. F. Industrial Uses $11.509/S.F. Warehouse Uses $9.713/S.F. Hospital Uses $17,527/Bed Commercial Recreational $24,890Acre No Other Category $4,313/Unit It should be noted that the existing community has contributed, on average, a greater amount, at about 14% more, than would be required of future development to meet all of the basic needs for build -out and all users. Tables 3-2 (Basic Needs -based Fair Share Fee) and 3-4 (Current Financial Commitment or Equity - based Proportionality Test Fair Share Fees) identify the amount of the pre -building. A detached dwelling, has contributed, on average about $14,306 (Table 3-4) towards the construction of the City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 31 Chapter 3 Circulation (Streets Signals and Bridges) System circulation (street, signals and bridges) system, while with adoption of the Basic Needs -based Fair Share Fees a detached dwelling unit would be asked to contribute $12,580 towards finishing the system, or just under 88% of the existing contribution of the same detached dwelling unit. Front -ended System. The resulting costs identified in Tables 3-2 and 3-4 indicate that there is the likelihood of excess capacity in the existing circulation system, or at least a disproportionate contribution between existing and future users of the City's circulation system. Recommended Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fee..The adoption of the Fair Share Fees identified in the Marginal Needs -based costs identified in Table 3-2 (and detailed in Schedule 3.2 at the end of the chapter), is recommended as the Fair Share Fee schedule for the Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System capital needs and would generate enough capital to construct the facilities needed to accommodate the new development. The impact fees contained within Schedule 3.2 are just slightly lower than the existing community's financial commitment equity amounts as calculated in Schedule 3.3, thus not violating any proportionality requirements. [This space left blank to place the Chapter endnotes on a single page]. City of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 32 Chapter 3 Circulation (Streets Signals and Bridges) S sy tem Chapter Endnotes 1. The City's Circulation element contains similar definitions and roadway cross-sections. For examples of each, see 7-4 and 7-5 in the City of Newport Beach General Plan Circulation Element. 2. Based upon 27.1 trip -miles per each of the 200 detached dwelling units (200 units X 27.1 trip -miles = 5,420 daily trip - miles). 3. Based upon ten acres with a 0.25 Floor Area Ratio at (10 acres X 43,560 square feet/acre X 0.25 FAR X 43.7 daily -trip miles per 1,000 S.F.). 4. Based upon the 25 % FAR anticipated in the future and 10,890 square feet per acre times 43.7 trip -ends. 5. The normal route between a daily work -site and the residence of the motorist. 6. As an example, a motorist travels the same route from work to home daily. On some number of occasions, the motorist stops at a market along the route to pick up some groceries. These stops at the market would be considered pass -by trip -ends in that they do not generate any additional miles along that route. 7. Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition, Institute of Traffic Engineers, 1099 14'" Street, NW., Suite 300, Washington D.C. 20005-3438, Chapter 5, Section 5. 1, Pass -by, Primary and Diverted Linked Trips. 8. Ibid, page 29 9. Ibid, page 29 10. Traffic Generators, San Diego Association of Governments, 401 B Street, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92101, Brief Guide to Traffic Generation Rates compiled in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, U.S. Department of Transportation, the California Department of Transportation and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. April, 2002, u y of Newport Beach Circulation System Fair Share Fee Calculation Report 33 Schedule 3. t City of Newport Beach 2007-08 Development impact (Fair Share) Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Allocation of Project Cost Estimates Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Construction Needs Construction Needs Needs That RepaidReplace That lncceases Circulation LCon to be Financed Infrastructure Capacity System Capacity by 011ier Sources Percent Apportioned Percent Apportioned Percent Apportioned Need Dollar Cost Need Dollar Cost Need Dollar Cost SUB -TOTAL ESTIMATED NEW PROJECT COSTS $364,441,383 LESS: on System DIF Fund Balance SUB-TOTA Total - Circulation System -related Capital Project Needs $363,846,383 evenue and Cost Specialists, L.L.C. 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 49.36%y $179,882,445 100.00%0 ($595,000) 100.00% ($595,000) 49.28% $179,287,445 Forward to Schedule 3.2 50.64% $184,558,938 0.00% $0 50.72% $184,558,938 Fullerton, CA 92831 Schedule 3.2 City of Newport Beach 2007-08 Development Impact (Fair Share) Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Marginal Needs -based Impact Costs (Fees) Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Proposed Land Use Undeveloped' Umfs Tiip-mile Generatfon Rate. Additional Daily Trip . -miles Percentage ofAdditional Tnp miles Allocation of Expansion costs Development impaclFeeperUnt or Square Foot Low Density Residential 1,321 27.10 35,799 9.27-/.l $16,618,750 $12,580 per Unit Medium Density Residential 4,696 20.40 95,798 24.80% $44,471,720 $9,470 per Unit Apartments 5,374 19.40 104,256 26.99% $48,398,126 $9,006 per Unit Mobile Homes (145) 14.70 (2,132) -0.55% ($989,726) $6,826 per Unit Elderly Residential 120 17.70 2,124 0.55% $986,011 $8,217 per Unit Commercial Lodging 2,221 17.98 39,934 10.34% $18,538,316 $8,347 per Unit Restaurants 57,760 86.17 4,977 1.29% $2,310,441 $40.001 per S.F Regional Commercial 288,525 43.70 12,609 3.26% $5,853,400 $20.287 per S.F General Commercial 1,600,397 42.05 67,297 17.43% $31,240,875 $79521 per S.F General/Medical Office 385,720 41.80 16,123 4.17% $7,484,682 $79.404 perS.F Industrial Uses(143,630) 21.80 (3,131) -0.81% ($1,453,485) $10.720 perS.F Warehouse Uses 1,000 18.40 18 0.00% $8,357 $8.357 per S.F Hospital Uses (beds) 377 33.20 12,516 3.24% $5,810,226 $15,412 per Bed Comm. Recreational (acres) 0 47.15 5 0.00% $2,322 $23,218 per Acre No Other Category (units) 2 8.17 16 0.00% $7,428 $3,714 per Unit TOTAL - 386,209 - 100.00%° $179:287 445 in Total Circulation Capital Needs Alternative Community Equity -based "Trip -mile" Cost Alternative 386,209 $779,287,445 $46422 per Daily Trip-mi/e ievenue and Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Schedule 3.3 City of Newport Beach 2007-08 Development Impact (Fair Share) Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Community Financial Committment or Equity -based Proportionality Test Fees Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System FPropased Land Use Developed Units Trip-ml/eExisting Generation Rate. Daily Trip -miles Percentage of Existing - Trip -miles A/location of Infrastructure 'Equity' Current Financial Commitment per Unit or Square Foot Low Density Residential 18,702 27.10 506,824 26.94% $267,558,212 $14,306 per Unit Medium Density Residential 10,974 20.40 223,870 11.90% $118,183,544 $10,769 per Unit Apartments Mobile Homes 9,703 19.40 188,238 10.01% 600 14.70 8,820 0.47% $99,373,004 $4,656,184 $10,241 per Unit $7,760 per Unit Elderly Residential Commercial Lodging 200 17.70 3,540 0.190/0 3,365 17.98 60,503 3.22% $1,868,810 $31,940,231 $9,344 per Unit $9,492 per Unit Restaurants 115,090 86.17 9,917 0.53% $5,235,298 $45.489 per S.F Regional Commercial General Commercial 1,331,000 43.70 58,165 3.09% 4,098,787 42.05 172,354 9.16% $30,705,974 $90,987,652 $23.070 pe1S.F $22199 per S.F General/Medical Office 13,129,386 41.80 548,808 29.17% $289,722,041 $22.067 per S.F Industrial Uses 1,291,079 21.80 28,146 1.500/0 $14,858,601 $11.509 per S.F Warehouse Uses 196,420 18.40 3,614 0.19% $1,907,872 $9.713 per S.F Hospital Uses (beds' Comm. Recreational (acres) 1,692 33.20 56,174 2.99% 69 47.15 3,258 0.17% $29,654,900 $1,719,932 $17,527 per Bed $24,890 per Acre No Other Category (units) 1,115 8.17 9,110 0.480/c $4,809,273 $4,313 per Unit TOTAL -- -- 1,881,341: 100:00% $993,181,510. Equity in Master Plan Major Streets in Master Plan Major Bridges a3653Equity Equity in Master Plan Traffic. Signals Equity in Master Plan Right -of -Way ExistingCirculation System Impact fee Fund Balance $52791 per Daily Trip -mile h ed'T 'I ^ Cost Alternative 1881341 $993,181,570 Marginal _ Fullerton, CA 92831 Revenue and Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Appendix A Master Facilities Plan 37 City of Newport Beach Master Facilities Plan Circulation (Streets, Bridges and Signals) System ST -01 Bluff Road and Coast Highway (la) S7 15th and Coast Highway Ob) ST -03 15th Street Bstensioa (IL) ST -04 Newport Boulevard and 32nd S[set (D & L7 `I ST -05 Riversida Avenue &Coast Highway (D '.! ST -06 Tustin Me,= & Coast Highway (8) MacArthur Blvd. & Campus Ave. (9) ST -08 Jamboree Road & CamPns Drive (13) ST -09 Ca Pus Drive & Bristol Street - North (15) Jamboree Road & Bristol Street -South (32) ST -10 Ford Read/Bonita Canyon (49) ST -11 MacArthur Road & MacArthur Road & San Joaquin Hills Road (50) ST -12 '.. ST -13 Coast Highway, Dover to Newport Blvd. (A) ST -14 Irvine Avenue & University Drive (B & 20) ST -15 Coast Highway and Bayside (C) >. ST -16 Placentia Avene, between Hospital &Superior (F% 151h Street betwoce Placcotia to Monrovia (G) ST -17 MacArthur, Southerly ofsm Miguel to Coast Highwa. ST -18 17th Street from Westerly Terminus to BluffRaad (J) ST -19 Road between 1711, Street to Coast Highway is ST -20 Bluff ST -21 19th Street to Itmokhurst (N) ST -22 Ashes Interchange Improvements .:' ST -23 Intelligent Transportation System cT-24 Pedestrian Improvements _. 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 201] 12 �JI so so $o $0 $o so $o $0 so $oso $o $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0 $o $0 $0 $o $0 $o $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $o $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so Totals... $0 column. Notes: this project. As a result, all projects default to the "Build -out 1. Project timing is not a component of W CO Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Sol $364,441,383 Project Build -out Total $5,781,000 $5.781.070 $3,359,000. $4,247,000 $2,121.070 $2.997,000 $16,585," S4,91 1. L64 S21,5341,0W $8,709,000 $90,961.000 Fullerton, CA 92831 Project Title: Bluff Road and Coast Highway (la) Submitting Department(s): Public Works - Engineering City of Newport Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Project No.: ST -01 Project Description: The proposed improvements consist of the addition of a second southbound right -turn lane and a second eastbound left -turn lane. The improvement is beyond that required with the initial construction of Bluff Road and is needed to accommodate projected increases in traffic volumes from General Plan development. The project increases circulation system capacity. One-half of the improvement cost is included in (and accommodates) City-wide development with the remainder specifically benefitting adjacent development. The project is consistent with the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection improvement is required to accommodate General Plan development at i the City's adopted level of service. The City can expect a 20% increase in the number of daily trip -miles from the current 1,881,341 daily trip -miles ns roughly thus optimum daily trip -miles, an increase of 386,209 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum lane mile configuration, turn pockets and pedestrian safety is absolutely necessary to complement the existing lane miles of existing major streets. Consequences of Not Completing Project: rculation improvements where wack. ev and needed would reduce the Level of Failure or inability to widen thoroughfares or make other ci Service (LOS) traffic (low along these street segments to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level E is "Unstable Flow", and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, 'Forced Flow" creates "jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations which restrict or prevent movement". Reference Documwit: Pro,feet Timing : City of Newport Fair Share Fee Program - Intersection Improvement The timing de scheduling of the capital construction or capita Outlay Preliminary Cost Estimates and MPHS (Master Plan of Streets and acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of lIris Highways). engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build -out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Design/Engutcerhrg/Admiu: Land Acquisition/Right of Construction Contingency Equipment/Other TOTAL COST 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 through Build - out all Years $0 $0 $0 $0 $513,000 $513,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,016,000 $2,016,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,713,000 $1,713,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,539,000 $1,539,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $5,781 000 $5 781 000 Potential Funding Sources: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fees, General Fund receipts, miscellaneous grants or potentially a specifically -defined tax measure. City of Newport Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail -- -- Program: Pro)ect Title Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System 15th and Coast Highway (lb) $0 Submitting Department(s): Project No.: ST -02 Public Works - Engineering $513,( Project Description: The proposed improvements consist of the addition of a second southbound right -turn lane and a second eastbound left -turn lane. The improvement is beyond that required with the initial construction of 15th Street and is needed to accommodate projected increases in traffic volumes from General Plan development. The project increases circulation system capacity. One-half of the improvement cost is included in (and accommodates) City-wide development with the remainder specifically benefitting adjacent development. The project is consistent with the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection improvement is required to accommodate General Plan development at the City's adopted level of service. The City can expect a 20% increase in the number of daily trip -miles from the current 1,881,341 daily trip -miles ns roughly thus optimum daily trip -miles, an increase of 386,209 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum lane mile configuration, turn pockets and pedestrian safety is absolutely necessary to complement the existing lane miles of existing major streets. Consequences of Not Completing Project elation improvements where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Failure or inability to widen thoroughfares or make other circ el E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level E is "Unstable Flow", and is identified Service (LOS) traffic flow along these street segments to Lev as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations which restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document Project Timing Share Fee Program -Intersection Improvement The timing scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay City of Newport Fair Highways). de Preliminary Cost Estimates and MPHS (Master Plan of Streets and acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build -out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Design/Engineering/Admit: Land Acquisition/Right of Construction Contingency Equipment/Other TOTAL COST 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 through Build -out $0 $0 $0 $0 $513,( $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,016,( $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,539, $0 $0 $0 $0 all Years 10 $513,000 '" )0 $2,016,000 ) $$1,713,000 00 $1,539,000:' $0 $0 $0 I $0 I $0 $5,781,000 $5,781,000 40 Potential Funding Sources: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fees, General Fund receipts, miscellaneous grants or potentially a specifically -defined tax measure. City of Newport Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail ..:.,. _.......:.. rogram: Project Title: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System 15th Street Extension (IL) Project No.: Suhmitting Department(s): ST -03 Public Works - Engineering Project Description: The project consists of the extension of 15th Street westerly from its current terminus at Monrovia Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway. The project benefits adjacent development and will most likely be required as a condition of approval. The project is consistent with the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). justification/Requirement for Project: to accommodate General Plan development athe City's adopted level of service. The City can This intersection improvement is required the current 1,881,341 daily trip -miles to roughly 2,267,550 daily trip -miles, an expect a 20% increase in the number of daily trip -miles from increase of 386,209 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum lane mile configuration, turn pockets and pedestrian safety is absolutely necessary to complement the existing lane miles of existing major streets. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen thoroughfares or make other circulation improvements where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of ttleneck. Level E is "Unstable Flow", and is identified Service (LOS) traffic flow along these street segments to Level E or F by acting as a bo as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations which restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Project Timitrg: City of Newport Fair Share Fee Program -Intersection Improvement The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay luded in the scope o! this Preliminary Cost Estimates and MPHS (Master Plan of Streets and acquisition described herein, was not inc engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build -out" column Highways).. PROPOSED 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Build -out all Years EXPENDITURES Design/Engineering/Admin. $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,757,750 $6,757,750 -'. Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,257,000 $40,257,000 - Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,888,000 $8,888,000 ConrLtgency Equipment/Otlter $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,273,250 $0 $20,273,250 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $76.17 - 6 000 $76.17 1 6, 1 000 41 Potential Fmidmg Sources: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fees, General Fund receipts, miscellaneous grants or potentially a specifically -defined tax measure. city of Newport Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Newport Boulevard and 32nd Street (D & E) Submitting Department(s): Public Works - Engineering Program: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Project No.: ST -04 Project Description: The proposed improvements consist of the addition of a southbound right -turn lane and a third northbound through lane. The project increases circulation system capacity and assists in accommodating new development. The project is consistent with the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways(MPSH) Justification/Requirement for Project: This segment of arterial roadway is required to complete the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH) and will assist n accommodating the over 20% increase in daily trip -miles at General Plan build -out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway or intersection will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from other roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now find at maximum carrying capacity. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen thoroughfares or make other circulation improvements where warranted and needed would reduce [he Levet oC street segments to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level E is "Unstable Flow", and is identified Service (LOS) traffic flow along these on". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "jammed conditions, back-ups from other as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersecti locations which restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Project Timing: City of Newport Fair Share Fee Program - Intersection Improvement Thge timing de scheduling of twedcapitalf ncluded nl the scopon or e 1 of this ldy Preliminary Cost Estimates and MPHS (Master Plan of Streets and engagement thus all project cost default to the "Build -out" column. Highways). PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Design/Engmeeri ng/Admiu: Land Acquisition/Right of Construction Contingency Equipment/Other TOTAL COST 2008-09 $0 2009-10 $0 2010-11 $0 2011-12 $0 dirough Build- uildout $141,750 all years $141,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,500 $14,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $664,000 $664,000 l $0 $0 $0 $0 $425,250 $425,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,245,50 0 S1.245.500 42 Potential Funding Sources: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fees, General Fund receipts, miscellaneous grants or potentially a specifically -defined tax measure. City of Newport Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Project Title: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Riverside Avenue & Coast Highway (7) Submitting Department(s): Project Public Works - Engineering ST -OS Project Description: The proposed improvements consist of the construction of a second eastbound left -turn lane, a third eastbound through lane and the conversion of the westbound right -turn lane into a through lane. These improvements are required to to accommodate the additional projected traffic volumes resulting from General Plan development throughout the City. The project is consistent with the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). Justifleation/Requirement for Project This intersection improvement is required to accommodate General Plan development at the City's adopted level of service. The City can 67,550 daily [rip -miles, an expect a 20% increase in the number of daily trip -miles from the current 1,881,341 daily trip -miles to roughly 2,2 increase of 386,209 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum lane mile configuration, turn pockets and pedestrian safety is absolutely necessary to complement the existing lane miles of existing major streets. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen thoroughfares or make other circulation improvements where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow along these street segments to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level E is "Unstable Flow", and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations which restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Project Timmg: City of Newport Fair Share Fee Program - Intersection Improvement The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay Preliminary Cost Estimates and MPHS (Master Plan of Streets and acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this Highways). engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build -out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Design/Engmeermg/Admv Land Acquisition/Right of Construction Contingency Equipment/Other TOTAL COST 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 through Build -out all Years' $0 $0 $0 $0 $298,250 $298,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $718,000 $718,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,448,000 $1,448,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $894,750 $894,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 '. $0 $0 $0 $0 $3 359,000 S3.359.000 Potential Funding Sources: 43 Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fees, General Fund receipts, miscellaneous grants or potentially a specifically -defined tax measure. �171777 M7, Ciry of Newport Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Protect Title: Tustin Avenue & Coast Highway (8) Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Project No.: Public Works - Engineering ST-06 Project Description: The proposed improvements include the construction of third eastbound through lane and the addition of a westbound left-turn lane. These ected traffic volumes resulting from General Plan development. The project is improvements are required to to accommodate the additional proj consistent with the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). Justification/Requirement for Project This intersection improvement is required to accommodate General Plan development at the City's adopted level of service. The City can expect a 20% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 1,881,341 daily trip-miles to roughly 2,267,550 daily trip-miles, an increase of 386,209 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum lane in configuration, turn pockets and pedestrian safety is absolutely necessary to complement the existing lane miles of existing major streets. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen thoroughfares or make other circulation improvements where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow along these street segments to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level E is "Unstable Flow' , and is identified ;. as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations which restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay City of Newport Fair Share Fee Program - Intersection Improvement Preliminary Cost Estimates and MPHS (Master Plan of Streets and acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this Highways). engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. 2012-13 Total PROPOSED 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 dlrough all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Engineering/Admin. $0 $0 $0 $0 $376,750 $376,750 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,134,000 $1,134,000 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,606,000 $1,606,000 ContLrgency $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,130,250 $1,130,250 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,247,000 $4,247.000 Potential Funding Sources: 44 Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fees, General Fund receipts, miscellaneous grants or potentially a specifically-defined tax measure. ' 7nne, 24)08 City of Newport Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Pro/eat Title. Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System MacArthur Blvd.&Campus Ave. (9) Project No.: Submitting Deparrmwrt(s): ST -07 Public Works - Engineering Project Description: The project consists of adding a third northbound left -turn lane and converts a southbound through lane to a right-turn/through lane. These improvements are required to to accommodate the additional projected traffic volumes resulting from General Plan development. The project increases circulation system capacity. One-half of the improvement cost is included in (and accommodates) City-wide new development with the remainder financed by the City of Irvine as a shared intersection. The project is consistent with the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection improvement is required to accommodate General Plan development at [he City's adopted level of service. The City can expect a 20% increase in the number of daily trip -miles from the current 1,881,341 daily trip -miles to roughly 2,267,550 daily trip -miles, an increase of 386,209 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum lane mile configuration, turn pockets and pedestrian safety is absolutely necessary to complement the existing lane miles of existing major streets. Consequences of Not Completing Project ulation improvements where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Failure or inability to widen thoroughfares or make other circ el E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level E "Unstable Flow and is identified Service (LOS) traffic flow along these street segments to Levn Level F. "Forced Flow" creates "jammed conditions, back-ups from other as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersectio locations which restrict or prevent movement". Project Timitrg: Reference Document: city of Newport Fair Share Fee Program - intersection Improvement The timing or scheduling of twherein,asanotemcluded inro[he scope'"( outlay Preliminary Cost Estimates and MPHS (Master Plan of Streets and acquisiengagements, thusallproject cost default to the "Build -out" column Highways). PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Design/Enguneerung/Admu Land Acquisition/Right of Construction Contingency Equipment/OdIcT TOTAL COST 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 - Buildout all Years $0 $0 $0 $0 $188,500 $188,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $420,000 $420,00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $947,000 $947 000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $565,500 $565,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -; $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,121,000 $2,121,000 45 Potential Funding Sources: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fees, General Fund receipts, miscellaneous grants or potentially a specifically -defined tax measure. City of Newport Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail ...... I Program: Project Title: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Jamboree Road & Campus Drive (13) Proiect No.: Submitting Department(s)r ST -08 Public Works - Engineering Project Description: The improvement consists of eliminating the eastbound free right -turn lane, adding a fourth southbound through lane and adding a northbound right -turn lane. These improvements are required to to accommodate the additional projected traffic volumes resulting from General Plan development. The project increases circulation system capacity. One-half of the improvement cost is included in (and accommodates) City-wide new development with the remainder financed by the City of Irvine as a shared intersection. The project is consistent with the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection improvement is required to accommodate General Plan development at the City's adopted level of service. The City can expect a 20% increase in the number of daily trip -miles from the current 1,881,341 daily trip -miles to roughly 2,267,550 daily trip -miles, an increase of 386,209 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum lane mile configuration, turn pockets and pedestrian safety is absolutely necessary to complement the existing lane miles of existing major streets. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen thoroughfares or make other circulation improvements where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow along these street segments to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level E is "Unstable Flow", and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations which restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Project Timing: City of Newport Fair Share Fee Program - Intersection Improvement The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay Preliminary Cost Estimates and MPHS (Master Plan of Streets and acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this Highways). engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build -out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Design/Engrneeri ng/Admh Land Acquisition/Right of Construction Contingency EquipmentlOdrer TOTAL COST 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 through Build -out all Yuri $0 $0 $0 $0 $266,250 $266,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $641,000 $641,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,291,000 $1,291,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $798,750 $798,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0......... $2 997,000 $2 997 000 Potential Funding Sources: 46 Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fees, General Fund receipts, miscellaneous grants or potentially a specifically -defined tax measure. City of Newport Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Campus Drive & Bristol Street - North (15) Submitting Department(s): Public works - Engineering Program: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Project No.: ST -09 Prgject Description: The project improvements consist of adding a fourth northbound through lane, adding a third southbound right -turn lane and a fifth westbound through lane. Also included is the widening of the Campus Drive bridge over SR -73. These improvements are required to to accommodate the additional projected traffic volumes resulting from General Plan development. The project increases circulation system capacity. Roughly 65% of the improvement cost is included in (and accommodates) City-wide development with the remainder financed by the County's John Wayne Airport as a mitigation contribution resulting from that facility's expansion. The project is consistent with the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). Justification/Requirement for Project General Plan development a[ the City's adopted level of service. The City can This intersection improvement is required to accommodate the current 1,881,341 daily trip -miles roughly 550 daily trip -miles, an expect a 20% increase in the number of daffy trip -miles from increase of 386,209 daily trip miles. There are limits as to he many additional lane miles can the existing lane miles of existing major streets. be constructed, tructed, thushus optimum lane mile configuration, turn pockets and pedestrian safety is absolutely necessary to complement Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen thoroughfares or make other circulation improvements where warranted and needed would reduce the Level o Service (LOS) traffic flow along these street segments to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level E is "Unstable Flow", and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations which restrict or prevent movement". Project Timing: Reference Document: City of Newport Fair Share Fee Program - Intersection Improvement acquisition timing de scheduling in Was not included inrthe scope of this ay Preliminary Cost Estimates and MPHS (Master Plan of Streets and engagement thus all project cost default to the "Build -out" column. Highways). PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Design/Engineering/Admit Land Acquisition/Right of Construction ContLrgency Equipment/Other TOTAL COST 2008-09ff- $0 ................... 2012-13 Total 2011-12 through all Build -out Years' $0 1 $1,471,250 I $1,471,250 $01 so $1,0760001 $1,076,000 $o l $0 l $9,624,000 1 $9,624,000 $0 1 $4,413,750 I $4,413,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 . _.., $0 $16 585 000 $0 $16,585,000 _.__ 47 Potential Funding Sources: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fees, General Fund receipts, miscellaneous grants or potentially a specifically -defined tax measure. City of Newport Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Jamboree Road & Bristol Street - South (32) Suhmitting Department(s): Public Works - Engineering Program: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System ST -10 No.: Project Description: The improvements include the addition of a sixth northbound lane and a fourth southbound lane on Jamboree Road bridge over SR -73. These improvements are required to to accommodate the additional projected traffic volumes resulting from General Plan development througout the City. The project increases circulation system capacity and accommodates development throughout the City. The project is consistent with the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). Justification/Requirement for Project: eral Plan development at the City's adopted level of service. The City can This intersection improvement is required to accommodate Gen expect a 20% increase in the number of daily trip -miles from the current 1,881,341 daily trip -miles to roughly 2,267,550 daily trip -miles, an increase of 386,209 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum lane mile configuration, turn pockets and pedestrian safety is absolutely necessary to complement the existing lane miles of existing major streets. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen thoroughfares or make other circulation improvements where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow along these street segments to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level E is "Unstable Flow", and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations which restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document Project Timing: City of Newport Fair Share Fee Program - Intersection Improvement The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay Preliminary Cost Estimates and MPHS (Master Plan of Streets and acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this Highways). engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build -out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Design/Engineerbng/Admu Land Acquisition/Right of Construction Contingency EquipmentlOdicr TOTAL COST 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 through Build -out .ill Years $0 $0 $0 $0 $111,618 $111,618 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4.464,695 $4,464,695 $0 $0 $0 $0 $334,853 $334,853 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 T„ en Qo $0 $4,911,166 $4,911,166 Potential Funding Sources: 48 Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fees, General Fund receipts, miscellaneous grants or potentially a specifically -defined tax measure. City of Newport Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Z77 Protect Title. Program: MacArthur Road & Ford Road/Bonita Canyon (49) Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Suhmittirng Department(s): Project No.: _.! Public Works - Engineering ST -11 Project Description: The project improvements consist of [he construction of a third southbound left -turn lane. These improvements are required to to accommodate the additional projected traffic volumes resulting from General Plan development. The project increases circulation system capacity and accommodates development throughout the City. The project is consistent with the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection improvement is required to accommodate General Plan development at the City's adopted level of service. The City can expect a 20% increase in the number of daily trip -miles from the current 1,881,341 daily trip -miles to roughly 2,267,550 daily trip -miles, an increase of 386,209 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum lane mile configuration, turn pockets and pedestrian safety is absolutely necessary to complement the existing lane miles of existing major streets. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen thoroughfares or make other circulation improvements where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow along these street segments to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level E is "Unstable Flow", and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates 'jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations which restrict or prevent movement". Project Reference Document: Timing: City of Newport Fair Share Fee Program - Intersection Improvement The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay Preliminary Cost Estimates and MPHS (Master Plan of Streets and acquisition described herein, was not included N the scope of this Highways). engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build -out" column 2012-13 Total PROPOSED 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 through all EXPENDITURES Build -out Years Design/Engineering/Admin. $0 $0 $0 $0 $237,500 $237 500 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $504,000 $504,000 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,219,000 $1,219,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $712,500 $712,500 EquipmenNOtlner $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,673,000 $2,673,000 Potential Funding Sources: 49 Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fees, General Fund receipts, miscellaneous grants or potentially a specifically -defined tax measure. ; Sme 3008 City of Newport Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Program: MacArthur Road & San Joaquin Hills Road (50) Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Project No.: Public Works - Engineering ST -l2 IX Project Description: ird southbound left -turn lane, the addition of a third eastbound left -turn lane and converting This improvement provide for the addition of a th the northbound free -right -turn to a shared through/right lane. These improvements are required to to accommodate the additional projected -out the City. The project increases circulation system capacity. traffic volumes resulting from General Plan development through Three-fourths of the improvement cost is included in (and accommodates) City-wide development with the remainder specifically benefitting adjacent development (Newport Center). The project is consistent with the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). Justdication/Requirement for Project: This intersection improvement is required to accommodate General Plan development at the City's adopted level of service. The City can expect a 20% increase in the number of daffy trip -mi es from the current 1,881,341 daily trip -miles to roughly 2,267,550 daily trip -miles, an increase of 386,209 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum lane mile configuration, turn pockets and pedestrian safety is absolutely necessary to complement the existing lane miles of existing major streets. Consequences of Not Completing Project: ! Failure or inability to widen thoroughfares or make other circulation improvements where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow along these street segments to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level E is "Unstable Flow", and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection'. Level F, "Forced Flow' creates "jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations which restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document Project Timing: City of Newport Fair Share Fee Program - Intersection Improvement The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay Preliminary Cost Estimates and MPHS (Master Plan of Streets and acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this Highways). engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build -out" column. 2012-13 Total PROPOSED 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 through all EXPENDITURES Build -out Years Design/Engineering/Admin. $0 $0 $0 $0 $423,250 $423,250 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,285,000 $1,285,000 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,789,000 $1,789,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,269,750 $1,269,750 EquipmendOtlter $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,767,000 $4.767, 00 0 Pofentinl Funding Sources: 50 Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fees, General Fund receipts, miscellaneous grants or potentially a specifically -defined tax measure. L61 -::I 7aae, 2008 7. City of Newport Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail U. Protect Title: Program: . (A) Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Coast Highway, Dover to Newport Blvd Submitting Department(s): Project No.: Public Works - Engineering ST-13 Project Description: The project improvements consists of the widening of Coast Highway to three lanes in each direction. These improvements are required to to accommodate the additional projected traffic volumes resulting from General Plan development. The project increases circulation system capacity and accommodates general new development. Even though the street segment is a State highway, no assistance from the Stale is anticipated. The project is consistent with the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). Justification/Requirement for Project: ty's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH) and will assist This segment of arterial roadway is required to complete the Ciin accommodating the over 20% increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway been displaced from other roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they or intersection will provide an alternative for drivers who have have previously been able to use but now find at maximum carrying capacity. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen thoroughfares or make other circulation improvements where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic Flow along these street segments to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level E is "Unstable Flow", and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations which restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Project Timing - Intersection Improvement The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay City of Newport Fair Share Fee Program acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this Preliminary Cost Estimates and MPHS (Master Plan of Streets and Highways). engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out' column. 2012-13 Total PROPOSED 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 rhrough all EXPENDITURES Build-our Years Design/Engmeermg/Admui. $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,910,750 $1,910,750 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,312,000 $8,312,000 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,579,000 $5.579.000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,732,250 $5.732,250 Equipmenty0ther $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $21,534,00 $21,534.0 00 Potential Funding Sources: .. 51 Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fees, General Fund receipts, miscellaneous grants or potentially a specifically-defined tax measure. 7uae, zoos ' City of Newport Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail pro jut Title Program: _._. Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Irvine Avenue & University Drive (B & 20) Submitting Department(s): Project No.: Public Works - Engineering ST-14 Project Descriptio[: The project include the widening of Irvine Avenue to three through lanes in each direction and the addition of a left/through lane for eastbound traffic. These improvements are required to to accommodate the additional projected traffic volumes resulting from General Plan development The project increases circulation system capacity and accommodates general new development. The project is consistent with the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). Justification/Requirement for Pro jut: This combined segment of arterial roadway and intersection improvement is required to complete the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH) and will assist in accommodating the over 20% increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway or intersection will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from other roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now find at maximum carrying capacity. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen thoroughfares or make other circulation improvements where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow along these street segments to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level E is "Unstable Flow", and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations which restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Project Timing City of Newport Fair Share Fee Program - Intersection Improvement The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay Preliminary Cost Estimates and MPHS (Master Plan of Streets and acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this Highways). engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. 2012-13 Total PROPOSED 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 tluougG all _..li EXPENDITURES Build-out rs Yw Design/Enguteering/Admur. $0 $0 $0 $0 $772,750 $772,750 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,297,300 $2,297,300 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,320,700 $3,320,700 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,318,250 $2,318,250 EquipmentlOtbar $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $8 709 000 $8 709,000 Potential Funding Sources: t 52 Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fees, General Fund receipts, miscellaneous grants or potentially a specifically-defined tax reensure. I:. jape 2008 City of Newport Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail ,.. ........____ Project Title: Program: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Coast Highway and Bayside (C) 2011-12 Submitting Department(s): Project No.: Public Works - Engineering ST -15 Project Description: The improvements consist of a fourth eastbound through lane from west of Bayside Drive to the point east of the intersection where the fourth lane begins. These improvements are required to to accommodate the additional projected traffic volumes resulting from General Plan development. The project increases circulation system capacity and accommodates general new development. Even though the street segment is a State highway, no assistance from the State is anticipated. The project is consistent with the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). Justification/Requirement for Proiecb This segment of arterial roadway is required to complete the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH) and will assist N ent. This segment of roadway accommodating the over 20% increase in daily trip -miles at General Plan build -out resulting from new developm or intersection will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from other roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now find at maximum carrying capacity. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen thoroughfares or make other circulation improvements where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow along these street segments to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level E is "Unstable Flow", and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forced Flow" creates "jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations which restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Proiect Timing: City of Newport Fair Share Fee Program - Intersection Improvement The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay Preliminary Cost Estimates and MPHS (Master Plan of Streets and acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this Highways). engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build -out" colmrur. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Design/Engineering/Admit Land Acquisition/Right of Construction Contingency Equipment/Other TOTAL COST 2008-09 :::::. 2009-10 ........... 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 through Build -out Total all Years $0 $0 $0 $0 $396,000 $396,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,234,000 $1,234,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,644,000 $1,644,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,188,000 $1,188,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,462,000 $4,46? 000 Potential Funding Sources: 53 Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fees, General Fund receipts, miscellaneous grants or potentially a specifically -defined tax measure. City of Newport Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Placentia Avene, between Hospital & Superior (F) Submitting Department(s): Public Works - Engineering Program: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Project No.: ST -16 Protect Description: The project consists of the widening of Placentia Avenue to two lanes in each direction. These improvements are required to to accommodate the additional projected traffic volumes resulting from General Plan development. The project increases circulation system capacity and accommodates general new development. The project is consistent with the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). Justification/Requirement for Project: This segment of arterial roadway is required to complete the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH) and will assist in accommodating the over 20% increase in daily trip -miles at General Plan build -out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway or intersection will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from other roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now find at maximum carrying capacity. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen thoroughfares or make other circulation improvements where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow along these street segments to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level E is "Unstable Flow", and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations which restrict or prevent movement". Reterence Document: Project Timing: City of Newport Fair Share Fee Program - Intersection Improvement The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay Preliminary Cost Estimates and MPHS (Master Plan of Streets and acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this Highways). engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build -out" column PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Design/Engmeermg/Admu Land Acquisition/Right of Construction Contingency Equipment/Other TOTAL COST 2008-09 2009-10 I 2010-11 I 2011-12 d1roug6 all Build -out Years $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 $4.790,000 $4,790,00 0 Potential Funding Sources: 54 Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fees, General Fund receipts, miscellaneous grants or potentially a specifically -defined tax measure. $425,000 $1,449,500 $1,449,500$1,640,500 W44$425,000 $1,640,500 $1,275,000 $1,275,000 $0 $0 $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 $4.790,000 $4,790,00 0 Potential Funding Sources: 54 Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fees, General Fund receipts, miscellaneous grants or potentially a specifically -defined tax measure. City of Newport Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: MacArthur, Southerly of San Miguel to Coast Highway (H) Submitting Deeartment(s): Public Works - Engineering Program: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System ST -18 No.: Project Description: The improvements include three through lanes in each direction in this major street segment. These improvements are required to to accommodate the additional projected traffic volumes resulting from General Plan development. The project increases circulation system capacity and accommodates general new development. The project is consistent with the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). Justification/Requirement for Project This segment of arterial roadway is required to complete the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH) and will assist in accommodating the over 20% increase in daily trip -miles at General Plan build -out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway or intersection will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from other roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now find at maximum carrying capacity. Consequences of Not Completing Project Failure or inability to widen thoroughfares or make other circulation improvements where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow along these street segments to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level E is "Unstable Flow", and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations which restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Project Timm-: City of Newport Fair Share Fee Program - Intersection Improvement The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay Preliminary Cost Estimates and MPHS (Master Plan of Streets and acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this Highways). engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build -out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2008-09 2009-10 20/0-11 2011-12 wry-ta fGrougG Build -out /oto! all years Design/Engineering/Admix. $0 $0 $0 $0 $237,500 $237,500 Land Acquisition/Rigit of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ 0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,722,000 $1,722,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $712,500 $712,500 EquipmenNOther $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,672,000 $2,672,000 Potential Funding Sources.: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fees, General Fund receipts, miscellaneous grants or potentially a 56 specifically -defined tax measure. City of Newport Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: 17th Street from Westerly Terminus to Bluff Road (I) Submitting Deparonent(s): Public Works - Engineering Program: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Project ST -19 Project Description: The project improvements consist of the extension of 17th Street westerly to connect with the future Bluff Road. These improvements are required to to accommodate the additional projected traffic volumes resulting from General Plan development. The project increases circulation system capacity and, barring additional knowledge about contiguous development, accommodates development through -out the City. The Project is consistent with the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). Justification/Requirement for Project This segment of arterial roadway is required to complete the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH) and will assist in accommodating the over 20% increase in daily trip -miles at General Plan build -out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway or intersection will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from other roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now find at maximum carrying capacity. _ Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen thoroughfares or make other circulation improvements where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow along these street segments to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level E is "Unstable Flow", and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations which restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: City of Newport Fair Share Fee Program - Intersection Improvement Preliminary Cost Estimates and MPHS (Master Plan of Streets and Highways). Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build -out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 20/1-l2 `V through �/ Build -out years Design/Enguteerilrg/Admin. $0 $0 $0 $0 $821,750 $821,750 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,009,000 $5,009,000 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $963,000 $963,000 Contingency Equipmentlodler $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,465,250 $0 $2,465,250 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0$0 $9,259,000 $9,259,000 Potential Funding Sources Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fees, General Fund receipts, miscellaneous grants or potentially a 57 specifically -defined tax measure. City of Newport Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Bluff Road between 17th Street to Coast Highway (K) Submitting Department(,): Public Works - Engineering Program: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Project No.: ST -20 Project Description: This project consists of the construction of Bluff Road to the standards of a four lane Secondary Arterial roadway. These improvements are required to to accommodate the additional projected traffic volumes resulting from General Plan development. The project increases circulation system capacity. Roughly 60% of the improvement cost is included in (and accommodates) City-wide development with the remainder specifically benefitting adjacent development. The project is consistent with the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). Justification/Requirement for Project: This segment of arterial roadway is required to complete the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH) and will assist in accommodating the over 20% increase in dally trip -miles at General Plan build -out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway or intersection will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from other roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now find at maximum carrying capacity. _ Consequences of Not Completing Protect: Failure or inability to widen thoroughfares or make other circulation improvements where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic Flow along these street segments to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level E is "Unstable Flow", and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations which restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: City of Newport Fair Share Fee Program - Intersection Improvement Preliminary Cost Estimates and MPHS (Master Plan of Streets and Highways). Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build -out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2'12-13 tl�rougG Total all Build -out years Design/Engineering/Admin. $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,069,500 $8,069,500 Land Acquisition/Rig9t of way $0 $0 $0 $0 $49,161,000 $49,161,000 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $91522,000 $9,522,000 . Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,208,500 $24,208,500 Equipment/Ocher $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 t TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,961,000$90,961.000 Potential Funding Sources: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fees, General Fund receipts, miscellaneous grants or potentially a 58 specifically -defined tax measure. Project Title: 19th Street to Brookhurst (N) Submitting Department(s): Public Works - Engineering City of Newport Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Project No.: ST -21 Project Description: This improvement consists of the extension of 19th Street form westerly terminus over the Santa Ana riverbed. These improvements are required to to accommodate the additional projected traffic volumes resulting from General Plan development. The project increases circulation system capacity. A quarter of the improvement costs are included in (and benefits) the City-wide cost distributuion with the remainder being financed by regional improvement funds. The project is consistent with the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). Justification/Requirement for Project This segment of arterial roadway is required to complete the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH) and will assist in accommodating the over 20% increase in daily trip -miles at General Plan build -out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway or intersection will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from other roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now find at maximum carrying capacity. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen thoroughfares or make other circulation improvements where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow along these street segments to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level E is "Unstable Flow", and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations which restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document City of Newport Fair Share Fee Program - Intersection Improvement Preliminary Cost Estimates and MPHS (Master Plan of Streets and Highways). Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build -out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Design/Engmeermg/Admin' 2008-09 $0 2009-10 $0 2010-11 $0 2011-12 $0 2012-13 through Build -out $0 Total al! years $0 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $55,586,717 — $55,586,717 Contingency Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 ..... $55,586,717 _ $55,586,717 otential Funding Sources: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fees, General Fund receipts, miscellaneous grants or potentially a 59 specifically -defined tax measure. Project Title: Arches Interchange Improvements Submitting Department(s): Public Works - Engineering City of Newport Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: _...._.._. Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Project ST -22 Project Description: This project consists improving ramp capacity and constructing through lanes on Pacific Coast Highway and Newport Boulevard to conform with the approved design concept. The project also reconfigures Old Newport Boulevard to connect directly to Santa Ana Avenue. These improvements are required to to accommodate the additional projected traffic volumes resulting from General Plan development. The project increases circulation system capacity. One half of the improvement costs are included in (and accommodates) City-wide development with the remainder being financed by regional improvement funds. The project is consistent with the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). Justification/Requirement for Project: This improvement will increase the capacity of this key circulation system component which has been identified as the busiest intersetcion in Orange County. The City can expect a 20% increase in the number of daily trip -miles from the current 1,881,341 daily trip -miles to the roughly 2,267,550 daily trip -miles, an increase of 386,209 daily trip -miles. The are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum configuration of this interchange is necessary to complement the existing lane miles of arterial roadways. Consequences of Not Completing project: Failure or inability to widen thoroughfares or make other circulation improvements where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow along these street segments to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level E is "Unstable Flow", and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations which restrict or prevent movement„. Reterence Document: City of Newport Fair Share Fee Program - Intersection Improvement Preliminary Cost Estimates and MPHS (Master Plan of Streets and Highways). Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build -out” column, PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2008-09 2009-/0 20/0-l/ 20/I -l2 20/2-/3 through Total all Design/Engineering/Admin. $0 Build -out years $0 $0 $0 $1,707,500 $1,707,500 Lend Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,830,000 $6,830,000 Contingency $0 $0 EquipmenUOther $0 $0 $5,122,500 $5,122,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,660,000 $13,660,000 Potential Funding Sources: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fees, General Fund receipts, 60 specifically -defined tax measure. miscellaneous grants or potentially a Project Title.' Intelligent Transportation System Submitting Depariment(s): Public Works - Engineering City of Newport Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Project No.: ST -23 Project Description: This project consists of the installation of Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) components at key locations that will be impacted by increased traffic. Included are items such as CCTV cameras, traffic operation center improvements and equipment upgrades at signalized intersections. These improvements are required to accommodate the reduction of required pedestrian crossing time on six and eight lane major roads. As a result, the project increases circulation system capacity. One half of the improvement costs are included in (and accommodates) City-wide development with the remainder being financed by regional improvement funds. The project is consistent with the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). Justification/Requirement for Project This project will maximize traffic flow on the roadway network. It will provide the City with the latest tools to coordinate traffic signals, timely identify problems and respond to unanticipated traffic congestion. The City can expect a 20% increase in the number of daily trip -miles over the existing. The are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum configuration of this interchange is necessary to complement the existing lane miles of arterial roadways. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum lane mile configuration, turn pockets and pedestrian safety is absolutely necessary to complement the existing lane miles of existing major streets. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen thoroughfares or make other circulation improvements where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow along these street segments to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level E is "Unstable Flow", and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations which restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document City of Newport Fair Share Fee Program - Intersection Improvement Preliminary Cost Estimates and MPHS (Master Plan of Streets and Highways). Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build -out" column. PROPOSED203 EXPENDITURES Design/Engineering/Admin. 2008-09 $0 2009-10 $0 20/0-11 $0 20//-/2 $0 through Be,oryears Total el $535,500 $535,500 Land Acqu' t:i n/Rig/rt of WV $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,142,000 $2,142,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,606,500 $1,606,500 EquipmentlOther $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,284,000 $4,284,000 Potential Funding Sources: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fees, General Fund receipts, miscellaneous grants or potentially a 61 specifically -defined tax measure. Project Description: The project will enhance pedestrian safety and circulation at key areas and includes improvements such as pedestrian over -crossings and signalized pedestrian crossings that are necessary due to maximization of major street widths. These improvements are required to accommodate the reduction of required pedestrian crossing time to cross six and eight lane major roads. As a result, the project increases circulation system capacity. One half of the improvement costs are included in (and benefits) the City-wide cost distributuion with the remainder being financed by regional improvement funds. The project is consistent with the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). lustilication/Requirement for Project These pedestrain improvements will increase the capacity of the road network. Relocating pedestrian crossings and/or coordinating them with adjacent signals reduces the conflicts between pedestrian and motoristss allowing smoothed traffic flow. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen thoroughfares or make other circulation improvements where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow along these street segments to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level E is "Unstable Flow", and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection'. Level F. "Forced Flow" creates "jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations which restrict or prevent movement'. Reference Document: City of Newport Fair Share Fee Program - Intersection Improvement Preliminary Cost Estimates and MPHS (Master Plan of Streets and Highways). PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Design/Engineering/Admu Land Acquisition/Right ,j- Construction fConstruction Contingency Equipment/Other TOTAL COST Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build -out" column. 2008-09 2009-10 2[112-13 2010-/l 20/!-!2 drrougG Build -out $04$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $6,000,000 $4,500,000 $0 $12,000,000 Potentia! Funding Sources: Circulation (streets, signals and bridges) System Fair Share Fees, General Fund receipts, miscellaneous grants or potentially a specifically -defined tax measure. all Years — $1,500,000 $0 $6,000,000 $4,500,000 $0 $12,000,000 62 Appendix B Expanded Land -use Database 63 Appendix B City of Newport Beach 2007-08 Development Impact (Fair Share) Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Land Use Database - Summary of All Sections Total - Entire City Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Apartments Mobile Homes Elderly Residential Commercial Lodging Restaurants Regional Commercial General Commercial General/Medical Office Industrial Uses Warehouse Uses Hospital Uses (beds) Comm. Recreational (acres) No Other Category (units) Existing Development # of Units 18,702 10,974 9,703 600 200 3,365 115,090 1,331,000 4,098,787 13,129,386 1,291,079 196,420 1,692 69 1,115 Anticipated Development # of Units 1,321 4,696 5,374 (145) 120 2,221 57,760 288,525 1,600,397 385,720 (143,630) 1,006- 37T 6- 2 Total G.P. Development # of Units 20,023 15,670 15,077 455 320 5,586 172,850 1,619,525 5,699,184 13,515,106 1,147,449 197,420 2,069 69 1,117 •, Appendix C Calculation of Trip -miles 65 Appendix C City of Newport Beach 2007-08 Development Impact (Fair Share) Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Calculation of Trip -miles, by Land -use Med. Density ResidentJ4 Total Trip -ends of Percen"o Diverted Diverted Percent Combined Remaining Adjusted'T.E. Average Trip -ands Total Total Trip- Average Specific Land -use Units per Diverted Trip -ends °/ Trip -ends of Pass -by Diverted and Trip TE's 45 as ate, Adjustmen Trip X 50.045 Units by -miles by Trip -mites Mobile Homes 600 Unit Trip -ends Adjustment Percent Trips (1) Pass -by TE's "Adjustment 0/." 45 X Total Trips Length X Length Land use Land -use per Unit Low Density Residential 18,702 7.50 77.0 50.0°/ 5.5 3.0 1 8.5 91.50 -hl 6.86 1 7.9 27.1 1 18,702 1 506,824 1 27.10 Med. Density ResidentJ4 10.974 5.64 11.0 50.0 -Al 5.5 1 3.0 1 8.5 91.50 -Al 5.16 1 7.9 1 20.4 10,974 223,870 20.40 Apartments 9,70 1 5.37 1 11.0 1 60.0-IbI 5.5 3.0 8.5 91.50° 4.91 7.91 19.4 1 9,703 1 188,238 19.40 Mobile Homes 600 4.06 11.0 50.0° 5.5 3.0 8.5 1 91.50S 3.71 1 7.9 1 14.7 1 600 1 8,820 1 14.70 Elderly Residential 200 4.90 11.0 1 50.0 5.5 3.0 8.5 1 91.50 -Al 4.48 1 7.9 1 17.7 1 200 1 3,540 1 17.70 Hotel Units 134 7.58 38.0 1 50.00/ 79.0 4.0 23.0 77.00°/ 5.84 1 7.6 1 22.2 1 134 2,975 Motel Units 3,231 6.08 38.0 1 50-00/bl 19.0 1 4.0 1 23.0 1 77.00° 4.68 1 7.6 17.8 1 3,231 57,512 Totals/Average 1 1 3,365 60,487 17.98 Restaurant 99,450 51.18 37.0 50.0 18.5 12.0 30.5 69.500.5 35.57 4.7 83.6 99,450 8,314,020 Fast Food Restaurant 15,640 62.78 37.0 50.00.5 18.5 12.0 30.5 69.500 43.63 4.7 102.5 1 15,640 1,603,100 Totals/Average 115,090 9,917,120 86.17 Regional Commercial 1,337,000 23.48 35.0 50.0° 17.5 11.0 28.5 71.50 16.79 5.2 43.7 7,331,000 58,164,700 43.70 Marina (slip 7 055 2.39 39.00 50.0 % 19.50 9.0 28.5 71.500/ 1.71 1 6.3 1 5.40 1 1,055 5,697 General Commercial 3,823,398 38.24 45.0 50.00A 22.5 15.0 37.5 62.500 23.90 1 3.6 1 43.0 1 3,823,398 1164.406,114 18 17 Auto Dealer/Sales 201,300 34.84 51 .OT 50.0% 25.5 28.0 53.5 46.50% 16.20 2.8 22.7 201,300 4,569,510 Yacht Club 51,830 22.71 45.0 50.0 22.5 15.0 37.5 62.600/ 14.19 6.3 44.7 51,830 2,316,807 Theater (seats) 5,489 0.34 45.0 50.0% 22.5 1 15.0 37.5 62.50% 0.21 6.1 0.60 5,489 3,293 Health Club 16,770 22.71 45.0 50.00 22.5 15.0 37.5 62.50 14.19 8.8 62.4 16,770 1 1,046,448 Totals/Average 4,098,787 1172.342,166 4205. General Office 11,657,709 11.08 19.0 50.0 9.5 4.0 13.5 86.50% 9-5-8-F-8.8 42.2 11,657,109 4917930,000 Medical Office 959.718 17.38 19.0 50.0 9.5 4.0 13.5 86.500 15.03 6.4 48.1 959,718 46,162,436 Churches/Centers 377,780 6.09 19.0 50.0% 9.5 2.0 11.5 88.50%1 5.39 5.1 13.7 377,780 5,175,586 Research/Development 81,730 7.10 19.0 5000h 9.5 4.0 13.5 86.500 6.14 11.7 35.9 81,730 2,934,107 Pre-school/Day Care 48,050 29.05 19.0 50.0 9.5 2.0 11.5 88.500 25.71 4.3 55.3 48,050 2,657,165 Elementary/Private Sch 4,999 1.30 79.0 50.00 9.5 2.0 11.5 88.500 1.15 4.3 2.50 4,999 12,498 Totals/Average 13,129,386 548,871,792 41.80 Industrial I1,291,079 5.48 19.0 50.0 9.5 2.0 i1.5 88.50° 4.85 9.0 21.80 1,297 079 28,145,522 21.80 Mini-Storage/Warehous 196,420 4.61 79.0 50.00 9.5 2.0 17.5 88.50 4.08 9.0 78.40 196,420 3,614,725 18.40 Hospital 1,031 13.57 19.0 50.00 9.5 20 11.5 88.500% 12.01 8.3 49.80 1,031 51344 Nursing/Conv. Homes 661 2.00 19.0 50.0% 9.5 2.0 11.5 88.50% 1.77 8.3 7.30 667 4,825 Totals/Average 1,692 1 56,169 133.20 Commercial/Recreation 5.1 37.07 45.0 50.00 225 15.0 37.5 62.5045 23.17 6.3 73.00 5 372 Newport Dunes 64.0 20.02 39.0 50.00.5 19.5 9.0 26.5 71.500% 14.31 E. 45.10 64 2886 Totals/Average 69 I 3,258 I47.15 Tennis Club (courts) 60 25.26 39.00 50.00/ 19.50 9.0 28.5 71.500 18.06 6.3 56.90 60 3,414 Marina (slip 7 055 2.39 39.00 50.0 % 19.50 9.0 28.5 71.500/ 1.71 1 6.3 1 5.40 1 1,055 5,697 Totals/Average 1 115 9.111 18 17 End of Document 67 CITY of NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN Figure CEI MASTER PLAN OF STREETS AND HIGHWAYS Legend 0 ADOPTED INTERCHANGE 0 PROPOSED INTERCHANGE ROUTES REQUIRING FURTHER COORDINATION 0.76 Mlles COMMUTER ROADWAY OM LANE UNDIVIDED) 3.24 Mlles SECONOARYROAD (FOUR LANE UNDIVIDED) 16.66 Miles SECONDARY (NOT BUILT) 0.26 Mlles PRIMARY ROAD (FOUR LANE DIVIDED) 29.62 Mlles PRIMARY ROAD •••••• (NOT BUILT) 3.06 Mlles MAJOR ROAD (SIX LANE DIVIDED) 30.64 Mlles EIGHT LANE ROAD Q32 Mlles ADOPTED FREEWAY ROUTES 4AB Mlles FUTURE FREEWAY EXTENSION 0.78 Mlles o as t TBS tee: cmarvanuneeamaa 1)nT ClppmR fAUJfGT 1AlA4fR tW)9-01 Wl: 921 p5 T -1 NEWPORT BEACH FAIRSHARE FEE PROGRAM UPDATE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES Location: Intersection #1a Bluff Rd & Coast Hwy Date: 08/07/2007 Mitigation: Add WB Right Tum, 2 EB Left Tums, 2 SB Left Tums, 2 SB Right Tums Estimated by: P. Chao tl:lwstestimates101 a bluff. coast.xls DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE QUANTITY COST 1 Mobiliza0on 10.00% $171,000 2 Clear&Grub $10,000.00 / AC 1.32 $13,000 3 Remove Striping $10.00 / LF 4,290 $43,000 4 Remove Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 1,650 $50,000 5 Remove Median Curb $30.00 / LF 1,890 $57,000 6 -Remove PCC Sidewalk$7.00 / SF 16,500 $116,000 7 Remove Pavement $4.00 / SF 7,100 $28,000 8 Remove Wall $10.00 / LF 0 $0 9 Remove Channel $15.00 / LF 220 $3,000 10 Remove/Replace Chain Link Fence $50.00 / LF 0 $0 11 Reconstruct Metal Beam Guard Rail $70.00 / LF 0 $0 12 Remove &Relocate Tree $3,0.00 / -0 -so 13 Sawcat $1$1.00 LF / LF 1,650 $2,000 14 Relocate Street Light $7,500.00 / EA 9 $68,000 15 Relocate Traffic Signal System $300,000.00 / EA 0 $0 16 Relocate Freeway Sin (2 post) $1,000.00 / EA 0 $0 17 lRelocateSigntl Post) $300.00 / EA 1 $0 18 Reconstruct Overhead Sign $50,000.00 / EA 0 $0 19 Relocate Call Box $2,000.00 / EA 0 $0 20 Relocate Power Pole(Wood) $25,000.00 / EA 0 $0 21 Relocate Catch Basin $8,000.00 / -EA 2 $16,000 22 Relocate Fire Hydrant $2,500.00 / EA 0 $0 23 Relocate Bus Bench - $600.00 / EA 1 $1,000 24 Relocate Monument Wall $5,000.00 / EA 0 - $0 25 Relocate Utility Boxes.00. $5 $50000.00 / EA 12 $6,000 26 Relocate Main Water Valve $ / EA 1 $5,000 27 Relocate UtilityVault - $3,000.00 / EA 1 $3,000 28 Adjust Manhole to Grade $1,500.00 / EA 0 $0 29 Adjust Water Meter -$500.00 / EA 0 $0 30 Adjust Water Valve $500.00 / EA 1 $1,000 37 Adjust Minor Above Ground Utilities $500.00 / EA 4 $2,000 32 Modify Driveway $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 33 Earthwork $12.00 / CY 2,700 $32,000 34 Construct PCC Pavement $15.00 / SF 0 $0 35 Construct AC Pavement $14.00 / SF 19,200 $269,000 36 Construct AC Overlay $3.00 / SF 0 $0 37 Construct Slurry Seal $0.25 / SF - 0 $0 38 Construct Striping & Marking $4.00 / LF 1,650 $7,000 39 Construct AC Dike $7.00 / LF 0 $0 40 Construct Curb & Gutter - $30.00 / LF 1;650 $50,000 41 Construct Concrete Barrier $50.00 ! LF 1 0 $0 42 Construct Median Curb $20.00 / LF 1,640 $33,000 43 Construct Median Concrete $10.00 / SF 10,660 $107,000 44 Construct Median/Parkway Landscaping $10.00 / SF 1,710 $17,000 45 Construct PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 17,700 $124,000 46 Construct Access Ramp $5,000.00 / EA 4 $20,000 47 Construct Retaining Wall $50.00 / SF 0 $0 48 Construct Storm Drain Main $100.00 / LF 0 $0 49 Construct RCB $1,000.00 / LF 150 $150,000 50 Construct Headwall $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 51 Construct Concrete V -Ditch $15.00 / LF 120 $2,000 52 Construct Bridge Widening $500.00 / SF 0 $0 53 Construct Parkway Landscaping/irrigation $10.00 / SF 0 $0 54 Construct Wall $70.00 / LF 0 $0 55 Building/Structure Demolition (1 Story) $10.00 / SF 0 $0 56 Traffic Control 80X 1 $98,000 57 Drainage Items 10°/a 1 $132,000 58 SWPPP Plan and Implementation 6- 1 $87,000 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $1,713,000 Right -of -Way 100 / SF 19,200 $1,920,000 Right -of -Way Management 5 ! % 1 $96,000 RIGHT-OF-WAY SUBTOTAL $2,016.000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & RIGHT-OF-WAY COST Preliminary Project Development (10% of total Construction/RW cost) Design Engineering/Administration Costs (15% of total Construction/RW cost) Construction Engineering Costs/Administration (10% of total Construction/RW cost) Contingency 20% of Total Construction/RW cost $3,729,000 $373,000 $560,000 $373,000 $746,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $5,781,000 tl:lwstestimates101 a bluff. coast.xls NEWPORT BEACH FAIRSHARE FEE PROGRAM UPDATE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES Location: Intersection #1 b 15th Street Extension to Coast Hwy Date: 08/07/2007 Mitigation: Two Lanes Northbound and Southbound on 15th Street to Coast Highway. Estimated by: D. Chantey NOTE. ( ) The Unit Price of Earthwork of $1 00.00/1-F is based on 104 it of road width from RW to RW, average depth of 10 it for cut and fill and $2.50/CY OoostestimatesWlb 15th -c stAs DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE QUANTITY COST 1 Mobilization 10.00% $1,060,000 2 Clear & Grub $10,000.00 / AC 9.25 $93,000 3 Remove Striping $10.00 / LF 1,496 $15,000 4 Remove Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 2,076 $62,000 5 Remove Median Curb $30.00 / LF 1,720 $52,000 6 Remove PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 20,762 $145,000 7 Remove Pavement $4.00 / SF 0 $0 8 Remove Wall $10.00 / LF 0 $0 9 Remove Channel $15.00 / LF 0 $0 10 Remove/Replace Chain Link Fence $50.00 / LF 564 $28,000 11 Reconstruct Metal Beam Guard Rail $70.00 I LF 0 $0 12 Remove & Relocate Tree $3,000.00 / EA -0-$0 13 Sawcut - $1.00 I LF 2,076 $2,000 14 Relocate Street Light $7,500.00 1 EA 18 $135,000 15 Relocate Traffic Signal System $300,000.00 / EA 0 $0 16 Relocate Freeway Sin 2post) $1,000.00 / EA 0 $0 17 Relocate Sin 1 Post $300.00 / EA 0 $0 18 Reconstruct Overhead Sign $50,000.00 / EA 0 $0 19 Relocate Call Box $2,000.00 / EA 0 $0 20 Relocate Power Pole (Wood) $25,000.00 / EA 1 $25,000 21 Relocate Catch Basin $8,000.00 / EA 3 $24,000 22 Relocate Fire Hydrant $2,500.00 / EA 0 $0 23 - Relocate Bus Bench $600.00 / EA 1 - $1,000 24 Relocate Monument Wall $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 25 Relocate Utility Boxes $500.00 / EA 0 $0 26 Relocate Main Water Valve $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 27 Relocate Utility Vault $3,000.00 / FA 5 $15,000 28 Adjust Manhole to Grade $1,500.00 / EA 1 $2,000 29 Adjust Water Meter $500.00 / EA 1 $1,000 30 Adjust Water Valve $500.00 / EA 0 $0 31 Adjust Minor Above Ground Utilities $500.00 / EA 5 $3,000 32 Modify Driveway $5,000.00 / EA 1 $5,000 33 Earthwork ') $100.00 1 LF 3,900 $390,000 34 Construct PCC Pavement $15.00 / SF 0 $0 35 Construct AC Pavement $14.00 / SF 348,882 $4,884,000 36 Constmct ACOverla $3.00 / SF 0 $0 37 Construct Slurry Seal $0.25 / SF - 0 $0 38 Construct Striping & Marking $4.00 / LF 5,117 $20,000 39 Construct AC Dike $7.00 / LF 0 $0 40 Construct Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 7,642 $229,000 41 - Construct Concrete Barrier $50.00 / LF 0 $0 42 Construct Median Curb $20.00-T LF 8,823 $176,000 43 Construct Median Concrete$10.00 / SF 0 $0 44 Construct Median/Parkwa Landscaping $10.00 / SF 69,478 $695,000 45 Construct PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 76,423 $535,000 46 Construct Access Ramp $5,000.00 / EA 8 $40,000 47 Construct Retaining Wali $50.00 1 SF 0 $0 48 Construct Storm Drain Main $100.00 / LF 0 $0 49 Construct RCB $1,000.00 / LF 0 $0 50 Construct Headwall $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 51 Construct Concrete V -Ditch $15.00 / LF 0 $0 52 Construct Bridge Widening $500.00 / SF 0 $0 53 Construct Parkway Landscaping/Irrigation $10.00 / SF 0 $0 54 Construct Wall $70.00 T --LF 0 $0 55 Building/Structure Demolition 1 Story) $10.00 / SF 0 $0 56 Traffic Control 8% 1 $606,000 57 Drainage Items 10% 1 $818,000 58 SWPPP Plan and Implementation 6% 1 $540,000 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL ,000 Right-of-Way100 / SF 402,600,000 Right -of -Way Management 5 / % ,000 A.000 RIGHT-OF-WAY SUBTOTAL TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & RIGHT-OF-WAY COST Preliminary Project Development (10% of total Construction/RW cost) Design Engineering/Administration Costs (15% of total Construction/RW cost) Construction Engineering Costs/Administration (10% of total Construction/RW cost) Contin enc 20% of Total Construction/RW cost $52,874,000 $5,288,000 $7,932,000 $5,288,000 $10,575,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $81,957,000 NOTE. ( ) The Unit Price of Earthwork of $1 00.00/1-F is based on 104 it of road width from RW to RW, average depth of 10 it for cut and fill and $2.50/CY OoostestimatesWlb 15th -c stAs NEWPORT BEACH FAIRSHARE FEE PROGRAM UPDATE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES Location: Intersection # 6 Newport Blvd & 32nd St Date: 08/07/2007 Mitigation: Add 2nd WB LT lane, EB LT lane, 3rd SB T lane, NB 3rd T lane Estimated by: S. Foster ddcostestimates106 newpod-32nd.xls DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE QUANTITY COST 1 2 Mobilization Clear & Gmb$10,000.00 10.00% / AC 0.0 $101,000 $0 3 4 5 Remove Striping - Remove Curb & Gutter Remove Median Curb $10.00 $30.00 $30.00 / LF / LF / LF 1,300 740 150 $13,000 $22,000 $5,000 6 Remove PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 4,550 $32,000 7 Remove Pavement $4.00 / SF 0 $0 8 Remove Wall $10.00 / LF 130 $1,000 9 Remove Channel $15.00 / LF 65 $1,000 10 Remove/Replace Chain Link Fence $50.00 / LF 0 $0 11 J Reconstruct Metal Beam Guard Rail $70.00 / LF 0 $0 12 Remove & Relocate Tree $3,000.00 / EA 6 $18,000 13 Sawcut $1.00 / LF 740 $1,000 14 Relocate Street Light $7,500.00 T EA9 $68,000 15 Relocate Traffic Signal System $300,000.00 / EA 1 $300,000 16 Relocate Freeway Sign (2 post) $1,000.00 / EA 0 $0 17 Relocate Sign (1 Post) $300.00 / EA 4 $100 18 Reconstruct Overhead Sign $50,000.00 / EA 0 $0 19 Relocate Call Box $2,000.00 / EA 0 $0- 20 Relocate Power Pole $25,000.00 / EA 0 $0 21 22 Relocate Catch Basin Relocate Fire Hydrant $8,000.00 $2,500.00 / EA / EA 3 0 $24,000 $0 23 Relocate Bus Bench $600.00 / EA 0 $0 24 25 Relocate Monument Wall Relocate -Utility Boxes $5,000.00 $500.00 / EA / EA 1 7 $5,000 $4,000 26 Relocate Main Water Valve $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 27 28 29 30 31 Relocate Utility Vault Ajust Manhole to Grade _ Adjust Water Meter Adjust Water Valve Adjust Minor Above Ground Utilities $3,000.00 $1,500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 / EA / EA / EA / EA -F-EA 1 9 0 2 5 $3,000 $14,000 $0 $1,000 $3,000 32 Modify Driveway $5,000.00 / EA 4 $20,000 33 34 Earthwork Construct PCC Pavement $12.00 $15.00 / CY / SF 650 0 $8,000 $0 35 36 Construct AC Pavement Construct AC Overlay $14.00 $3.00 / SF / SF 4,500. 0 $63,000 $0 37 jConstmct Slurry Seal $0.25 / SF 80,500 $20,000 38 . Construct Stri in & Markin $4.00 / LF 1,300 $5,000 39 Construct AC Dike - $7.00 / LF 0 $0 40 Construct Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 740 $22,000 41 Construct Concrete Barrier $50.00 / LF 0 $o 42 43 Construct Median Curb Construct Median Concrete $20.00 $10.00 / LF / SF 100 230 $2,000 $2,000 44 Construct Median/Parkway Landscaping $10.00 / SF 0 $0 45 46 Construct PCC Sidewalk Construct Access Ramp - $7.00 $5,000.00 / SF / EA 4,550 6 $32,000 $30,000 47 Construct Retaining Wall $50.00 / SF 90 $5,000 48 Construct Stonn Drain Main $100.00 / LF 0 $0 49 Construct RCB $1,000.00 / LF 0 $0 50 Construct Headwall $5,000.00 / EA 0 - $0 51 Construct Concrete V -Ditch $15.00 / LF --0-$0 52 Construct Bridge Widening $500.00 / SF 0 $0 53 Construct Parkway Landscaping/Irrigation $0.00 / 0 $0 54 Construct Wall $77 LF / LF 0 $0 55 Building/Structure Demolition (1 Sto ) $10.00 / SF 1 $0 56 Traffic Control 8°/ 1 $58,000 57 Drainage Items 10% 1 $78,000 58 SWPPP Plan and Implementation 6% 1 $52,000 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $1,014,000 Right -of -Way 100 / SF 135 $13,500 Right-of-WayRighLof-Way Management 5 / % $1,000 RIGHT-OF-WAY SUBTOTAL $14.5 0 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & RIGHT-OF-WAY COST Preliminary Project Development (10% of total Construction/RW cost) Design Engineering/Administration Costs (15% of total Conslruc0on/RW cost) Construction Engineering Costs/Administration (10% of total Construction/RW cost) Contingency 20% of Total Construction/RW cost $1,029,000 $103,000 $155,000 $103,000 $206,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $1,596,000 ddcostestimates106 newpod-32nd.xls NEWPORT BEACH FAIRSHARE FEE PROGRAM UPDATE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES Location: Intersection #7 Riverside Ave & Coast Hwy Date: 08/07/2007 Mitigation: Add 2nd EB LT lane, 3rd EB T lane, Eliminate WB RT lane Estimated by: S. Foster/J. McNeill dAw.testirrates107 riverside-wast.xls DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE QUANTITY COST 1 Mobilization 10.00% $145,000 2 Clear & Grub $10,000.00 / AC 0.1 $1,000 3 Remove Striping $10.00 / LF 1,420 $14,000 4 Remove Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 1,150 $35,000 5 Remove Median Curb $30.00 / LF 1,015 $30,000 6 Remove PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 12,630 $88,000 7 Remove Pavement $4.00 / SF 4,090 $16,000 8 Remove Wall $10.00 / LF 0 $0, 9 Remove Channel $15.00 / LF 0 $0 10 Remove/Replace Chain Link Fence $50.00 / LF 0 $0 11 Reconstruct Metal Beam Guard Rail $70.00 / LF 0 $0 12 Remove & Relocate Tree $3,000.00 / EA 0 $0 13 Sawcut $1.00 / LF 2,520 $3,000 14 Relocate Street Light $7,500.00 / EA 2 $15,000 15 Relocate Traffic Signal System $300,000.00 / EA 1 $300,000 16 Relocate Freeway Sign 2 post $1,000.00 / EA 0 $0 17 Relocate Sign 1 Post $300.00 / EA 6 $2,000 18 Reconstruct Overhead Sign $50,000.00 ! EA 0 $0 19 Relocate Call Box $2,000.00 / EA 0 $0 20 Relocate Power Pole $25,000.00 ! EA 0 $0 21 Relocate Catch Basin $8,000.00 / EA 2 $16,000 22 Relocate Fire Hydrant $2,500.00 / EA 1 $3,000 23 Relocate Bus Bench $600.00 / EA0 $0 24 Relocate Monument Wall $5,000.00 / EA 2 $10,000 25 Relocate Utilit Boxes $500.00 / EA 13 $7,000 26 Relocate Main Water Valve $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 27 Relocate Utility Vault $3,000.00 / EA -2-$6,000 28 Adjust Manhole to Grade $1,500.00 -IEA 12 $18,000 29 Adjust Water Meter $500.00 / EA 20 $10,000 30 Adjust Water Valve $500.00 ! EA 1 $1,000 31 Ad ust Minor Above Ground Utilities $500.00 / EA 7 $4,000 32 Modify Driveway $5,000.00 / EA 6 $30,000 33 Earthwork $12.00 / CY 1,450 $17,000 34 Construct PCC Pavement $15.00 / SF 0 - $0 35 Construct ACPavement $14.00 / SF 13,800 $193,000 36 Construct AC Overlay $3.00 / SF 0 $0 37 Construct Slurry Seal $0.25 / SF 106,600 $27,000 38 Construct Striping & Marking $4.00 / LF 1,420 $6,000 39 Construct AC Dike $7.00 / LF 0 $0 40 Construct Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 952 $29,000 41 Construct Concrete Barrier $50.00 / LF 0 $0 42 Construct Median Curb $20.00 / LF 750 $15,000 43 Construct Median Concrete $10.00 / SF 2,370 $24,000 44 Construct Median/Parkwa Landscaping $10.00 / SF 0 $0 45 Construct PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 9,000 $63,000 46 Constmct Access Ramp $5,000.00 / EA 2 $10,000 47 Construct RetainingWall $50.00 / SF $0 48 . Construct Storm Drain Main $100.00 / LF - $0 49 Construct RCB $1,000.00 / LF $0 50 Construct Headwall $5,000.00 / EA $0 51 Construct Concrete V -Ditch $15.00 / LF $0 52 Construct Bridge Widening $500.00 -/,9 F $0 53 Construct Parkway Landscaping/Irrigation $10.00 / SF$0 54 Construct Wall $70.00 / LF $0 55 Building/Structure Demolition 1 Story) $10.00 / SF 4,120 $41,000 56 Traffic Control 8%n 1 $83,000 57 Drainage Items 10% 1 $112,000 58 SWPPP Plan and Implementation 6% 1 $74,000 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL - $1,448,000 Right -of -Way 100 / SF 6,840 $684,000 Ri ht-of-Wa Mana ement 5 / % $34,000 RIGHT-OF-WAY SUBTOTAL $718,000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & RIGHT-OF-WAY COST $2,166,000 Preliminary Project Development (10% of total Construction/RW cost) $217,000 Design Engineering/Administration Costs (15% of total Construcfion/RW cost) $325,000 Construction Engineering Costs/Administration (10% of total Construction/RW cost) $217,000 Contin enc 20% of Total Construction/RW cost $434,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $3,359,000 dAw.testirrates107 riverside-wast.xls NEWPORT BEACH FAIRSHARE FEE PROGRAM UPDATE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES Location: Intersection #8 Tustin Ave & Coast Hwy Date: 08/07/2007 Mitigation: Add 3rd EB T lane Estimated by: S. Foster/J. McNeill d:kostestimates\08 tustin - coaslxls DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE QUANTITY COST 1 Mobilization 10.00% $161,000 2 Clear & Grub $10,000.00 / AC 0 $0 3 Remove Striping- $10.00 I LF 1,050 $11,000 4 Remove Curb &Gutter $30.00 / LF 875 $26,000 5 Remove Median Curb $30.00 / LF 570 $17,000 6 Remove PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 9,100 $64,000 7 Remove Pavement $4.00 / SF 1,200$5,000 8 Remove Wall $10.00 / LF $0 9 Remove Channel $15.00 / LF $0 10 Remove/Replace Chain Link Fence $50.00 / LF $0 11 Reconstruct Metal Beam Guard Rail $70.00 / LF $0 12 Remove & Relocate Tree $3,000.00 / EA 13 $39,000 13 Sawcut $1.00 / LF 875 $1,000 14 Relocate Street Light $7,500.00 / EA 1 $8,000 15 Relocate Traffic Signal System $300,000.00 / EA 1 $300,000 16 Relocate Freeway Sign (2 post) $1,000.00 / EA 0 $0 17 Relocate Sign (1 Post) $300.00 / EA 8 $2,000 18 Reconstruct Overhead Sign $50,000.00 / EA$0 19 Relocate Call Box $2,000.00 / EA $0 20 Relocate Power Pole (Wood) $25,000.00 / EA $0 21 Relocate Catch Basin $8,000.00 / FA 2 $16,000 22 Relocate Fire Hydrant $2,500.00 / FA 1 $3,000 23 Relocate Bus Bench $600.00 / EA 20 $12,000 24 Relocate Monument Wall $5,000.00 / EA 5 $25,000 25 Relocate Utility Boxes $500.00 / EA 15 $8,000 26 Relocate Main Water Valve - $5,000.00 / EA $0 27 Relocate Utility Vault $3,000.00 / EA 6 $18,000 28 Adjust Manhole to Grade $1,500.00 / EA 14 $21,000 29 Adjust Water Meter $500.00 / EA 17 $9,000 30 Adjust Water Valve - $500.00 / EA $0 31 Adjust Minor Above Ground Utilities $500.00 / EA 16 $8,000 32 Modify Driveway $5,000.00 / EA 5 $25,000 33 Earthwork $12.00 / CV 1,200 $14,000 34 Construct PCC Pavement $15.00 / SF $0 35 Construct AC Pavement $14.00 / SF 9,400 $132,000 36 Construct AC Overlay $3.00 ! SF $0 37 Construct Slurry Seal $0.25 / SF - 93,200 $23,000 38 Construct Striping & Marking $4.00 / LF 1,050 $4,000 39 Construct AC Dike $7.00 / LF $0 40 Construct Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 840 $25,000 41Constmct Concrete Barrier $50.00 / LF $0 42 Construct Median Curb $20.00 / LF 450 $9,000 43 ConsWct Median Concrete $10.00 / SF 1,650 $17,000 44 Construct Median/Parkway Landscaping $10.00 / SF $0 45 Construct PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 6,400 $45,000 46 Construct Access Ramp $5,000.00 / EA 2$10,000 47 Construct RetainingWall $50.00 / SF $0 46 lConstruct Sic" Drain Main $100.00 / LF $p 49 Construct RCB $1,000.00 / LF $0 50 Construct Headwall $5,000.00 / EA $0 51 Construct Concrete V -Ditch $15.00 / LF $0 52 Construct Bride Widening - $500.00 / SF $0 53 Construct Parkway Landscaping/Irrigation $10.00 / SF $0 54 Construct Wall $70.00 / LF $0 55 Building/Structure Demolition (1 Story) $10.00 / SF 4,720 $47,000 56 Building/Structure Demolition (2 Story) $15.00 / SF 14,620 $219,000 57 Traffic Control 8% 1 $76,000 58 Drainage Items 10% 1 $124,000 59 SWPPP Plan and Implementation 6% 1 $82,000 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $1 606,000 Right-of-Way100 / SF 10,800 $1,080,000 Right -of -Way Mana ement 5 / % $54,000 RIGHT-OF-WAY SUBTOTAL $1,134,000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & RIGHT-OF-WAY COST $2,740,000 Preliminary Project Development (10% of total Construction/RW cost) $274,000 Design Engineering/Administration Costs (15% of total Construction/RW cost) $411,000 Construction Engineering Costs/Administration (10% of total Construction/RW cost) $274,000 Contingency (20% of Total Constmction/RW cost $548,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $4,247,000 d:kostestimates\08 tustin - coaslxls NEWPORT BEACH FAIRSHARE FEE PROGRAM UPDATE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES Location: Intersection # 9 MacArthur Blvd & Campus Or Date: 08/07/2007 Mitigation: Add 2nd NB L lane, Add SB T/RT, Eliminate SB through _ Estimated by: S. Foster d:kostestimates\09 mamdhur - campus.xls DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE QUANTITY COST 1 2 3 4 5 Mobilization Clear & Grub Remove Striping Remove Curb & Gutter Remove Median Curb 10.00% $10,000.00 -$10.00 $30.00 $30.00 I AC / LF / LF / LF 1 0.1 1,300 850 50 $,000Grub$1 $1,000 $13,000 $26,000 $2,000 6 7 Remove PCC Sidewalk Remove Pavement $7.00 $4.00 / SF / SF 2,950 0 $21,000 $0 8 Remove Wall $10.00 / LF 0 $0 9 Remove Channel $15.00 / LF 0 $0 10 Remove/Replace Chain Link Fence $50.00 / LF 0 $0 11 Reconstruct Metal Beam Guard Rail $70.00 / LF 0 $0 12 13 Remove & Relocate Tree Sawcut - $3,000.00 $1.00 / EA / LF 15 850 $45,000 $1,000 14 Relocate Street Light $7,500.00 / EA 3 $23,000 15 16 Relocate Traffic Signal System Relocate Freeway Sin 2post) $300,000.00 $1,000.00 I EA / EA 1 0 $300,000 $0 17 Relocate Sign (1 Post) $300.00 -/ EA 3 $1,000 18 Reconstruct Overhead Sign 0,000.00 -/ EA 0 $0 19 Relocate Call Box $2,000.00 / EA 0 $0 20 Relocate Power Pole (wooden) $25,000.00 / FA 0 $0 21 Relocate Catch Basin $8,000.00 / EA 1 $8,000 22 Relocate Fire Hydrant $2,500.00 / EA 3 $8,000 23 Relocate Bus Bench $600.00 / EA 0 $0 24 Relocate Monument Wall $5,000.00 / EA -0-$0 25 26 Relocate Utility Boxes Relocate Main Water Valve $500.00 $5,000.00 / EA / EA 9 0 $5,000 $0 27 28 Relocate Utility Vault Adjust Manhole to Grade $3,000.00 $1,500.00 / EA / EA 3 1 $9,000 $2,000 29 Adjust Water Meter $500.00 / EA 0 $0 30 Adjust Water Valve $500.00 1 EA 0 $0 31 Adjust Minor Above Ground Utilifies $500.00 / EA 1 $1,000 32 33 34 Modify Driveway Earthwork Construct PCC Pavement $5,000.00 $12.00 $15.00 / EA / CY / SF 8 500 0 $40,000 $6,000 $0 35 36 Construct AC Pavement Construct AC Overlay $14.00 $3.O0 / SF / SF 51000 0 $70,000 $0 37 Construct Slurry Seal $0.25 / SF 72,200 $18,000 38 Construct Std in & Marking $4.00 / LF 1,300 $5,000 39 Constmct AC Dike $7.00 / LF 0 $0 40 Construct Curb &Gutter $30.00 / LF 850 $26,000 41 Construct Concrete Barrier $50.00 1 LF 0 $0 42 Construct Median Curb $20.00 / LF 50 $1,000 43 Construct Median Concrete $10.00 / SF 120 $1,000 44 Construct Median/Parkway Landscaping$10.00 / SF 0 $0 45 Construct PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 2,750 $19,000 46 Construct Access Ramp $5,000.00 / EA 5 $25,000 47 Construct Retaining Wall $50.00 / SF 0 $0 48 Construct Storrs Drain Main $100.00 / LF 0 $0 49 Construct RCB $1,000.00 / LF 0 $0 50 Construct Headwall $5,000.00 / FA 0 $0 51 Construct Concrete V -Ditch $15.00 / LF 0 $0 52 Construct Bridge e Widenin $500.00 / SF 0 $0 53 Construct Parkway Landscaping/Irrigation $10.00 / SF 0 $0 54 Construct Wall $70.00 7 LF 0 $0 55 Buildin /Stmcture Demolition (1 Story) $10.00 / SF -0-$0 56 Traffic Control 8% 1 $54,000 57 Drainage Items 10% 1 $73,000 58 SW PPP Plan and implementation 6% 1 $48,000 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $947,000 IlRigbt-of-Way 100 I SF 4,000 $400,000 Rioht-of-Way Management 5 / % 1 $20,000 RIGHT-OF-WAY SUBTOTAL $420000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & RIGHT-OF-WAY COST Preliminary Project Development (10% of total Constmction/RW cost) Design Engineering/Administration Costs (15% of total Construction/RW cost) Construction Engineering Costs/Administration (10% of total Construction/RW cost) Contingency 20°% of Total Construction/RW cost $1,367,000 $137,000 $206,000 $137,000 $274,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $2,121,000 d:kostestimates\09 mamdhur - campus.xls NEWPORT BEACH FAIRSHARE FEE PROGRAM UPDATE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES Location: Intersection #13 Jamboree Rd & Campus Or Date: 08107/2007 Mitigation: Eliminate EB Free RT lane, Add NB RT lane, Add 4th SB T lane Estimated by: S. Foster/J. McNeill d.kostestimatesM Jamboree - wmpus.xls DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE QUANTITY COST 1 Mobilization 10.00%$129,000 2 Clear & Grub $10,000.00 / AC 0.3 $3,000 3 Remove Striping$10.00 / LF 750 $8,000 4 Remove Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 1,050 $32,000 5 Remove Median Curb ---$30.00 / LF 0 $0 6 Remove PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 2,400 $17,000 7 Remove Pavement $4.00 / SF 1,000 $4,000 8 Remove Wall $10.00 LF - 0 $0 9 Remove Channel $15.00 / LF 0 $0 10 Remove/Replace Chain Link Fence $50.00 / LF 0 $0 11 Reconstruct Metal Beam Guard Rail $70.00 / LF 0 $0 12 Remove & Relocate Tree $3,000.00 -/ EA 14 $42,000 13 Sawcut $1.00 / LF 1,050 $1,000 14 Relocate Street Light $7,500.00 / EA 4 $30,000 15 Relocate Traffic Signal System $300,000.00 / EA 1 $300,000 16 Relocate Freeway Sign (2 post) $1,000.00 / EA 0 $0- 17 Relocate Sign (1 Post) $300.00 / FA 2 $1,000 18 Reconstruct Overhead Sign $50,000.00 / EA 0 $0 19 Relocate Power Pole (Wood) $25,000.00 / FA 3 $75,000 20 Relocate Power Pole (Steel) $100,000.00 / EA 1 $100,000 21 Relocate Catch Basin $8,000.00 / EA -IEA 0 $0 22 Relocate Fire Hydrant $2,500.00 0 $0 23 Relocate Bus Bench $600.00 I EA 0 $0 24 Relocate Monument Wall $5,000.00 / EA 0 - $0 25 Relocate Utility Boxes $500.00 I FA 9 $5,000 26 Relocate Main Water Valve $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 27 Relocate Utility Vault $3,000.00 / EA 2 $6,000 28 Adjust Manhole to Grade$1,500.00 / EA 7 $11,000 29 Adjust Water Meter $500.00 / EA -1-$500.00 6 $3,000 30 Adjust Water Valve FA 0 $p 31 Adjust Minor Above Ground Utilities $500.00 / EA 1 $1,000 32 Modify Driveway $5,000.00 / EA 2 $10,000 33 Earthwork $12.00 / CY 900 $11,000 34 Construct PCC Pavement - $15.00 / SF 0 $0 35 Construct AC Pavement $14.00 I SF 14,150 $198,000 36Construct AC Overia $3.00 / SF 0 $0 37 Construct Slurry Seal $0.25 / SF 4,000 $1,000 38 Construct Striping & Marking - $4.00 / LF 750 $3,000 39 Construct AC Dike $7.00 / LF 0 $0 40 Construct Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 900 $27,000 41 Construct Concrete Barrier $50.00 / LF 0 $0 42 Construct Median Curb $20.00 / LF 0 - $o 43 Construct Median Concrete $10.00 I SF -0-$0 44 lConstruct Median/Parkway Landscaping - $10.00 / SF -0-$0 45 Construct PCC Sidewalk $7.00 /- SF 1,860 $13,000 46 lConstruct Access Ramp $5,000.00 / FA 4 $20,000 47 Construct Retaining Wall $50.00 / SF 0 $0 48 Construct Storm Drain Main $100.00 / LF 0 $0 49 Construct RCB $1,000.00 / LF 0 $0 50 Construct Headwall $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 51 Construct Concrete V -Ditch $15.00 / LF 0 $0 52 Construct Bridge Widening $500.00 / SF 0 $0 53 Construct Parkway Landscaping/Irrigation$10.00 / SF 0 $0 54 Construct Wall $70.00-/ LF 0 $0 55 Building/Structure Demolition (1 Sto $10.00 / SF 0 $0 56 Traffic Control 8% 1 $74,000 57 Drainage Items 10% 1 $100,000 58 SWPPP Plan and Implementation 6% 1 $66.000 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $1 291,000 Right -of -Way 100 / SF 6,100 $610,000 Right -of -Way Management 5 / % - $31,000 RIGHT-OF-WAY SUBTOTAL $641,000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & RIGHT-OF-WAY COST Preliminary Project Development (10% of total Construction/RW cost) Design Engineering/Administration Costs (15% of total Construction/RW cost) Construction Engineering Costs/Administration (10% of total Construction/RW cost) Contin en 20% of Total Constmction/RW cost $1,932,000 $194,000 $290,000 $194,000 $387,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $2,997,000 d.kostestimatesM Jamboree - wmpus.xls NEWPORT BEACH FAIRSHARE FEE PROGRAM UPDATE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES Location: Intersection #15 Campus Or & Bristol St North Date: 08/07/2007 Mitigation: Add 4th NB T Lane, Add 3rd SB RT Lane, Add 5th WB T Lane Estimated by: J. McNeill dkostes6mates115 campus - bristol.xls DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE QUANTITY COST 1 Mobilization 10.00% $962,000 2 Clear & Grub - $10,000.00 / AC 1.0 $10,000 3 Remove Striping $10.00 / LF 1,400 $14,000 4 Remove Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 3,500 $105,000 5 Remove Median Curb $30.00 / LF 1,060 $32,000 6 Remove PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 14,700 $103,000 7 Remove Pavement $4.00 / SF 0 $0 8 Remove Wall $10.00 / LF 250 $3,000 9 Remove Channel $15.00 / LF 0 $0 10 Remove/Replace Chain Link Fence $50.00 1 LF 600 $30,000 11 Reconstruct Metal Beam Guard Rail $70.00 / LF 75 $5,000 12 Remove & Relocate Tree $3,000.00 / EA 125 $375,000 13 Sawcut $1.00 I LF - 4,170 $4,000 14 Relocate Street Light $7,500.00 / EA 4 $30,000 15 Relocate Traffic Signal System $300,000.00 / EA 2 $525,000 16 Relocate Freeway Sin 2 post) $1,000.00 / FA 0 $0 17 Relocate Sign 1 Post) $300.00 I EA 20 $6,000 18 Reconstruct Overhead Sign $50,000.001 EA 1 $50,000 19 Relocate Call Box $2,000.00 / EA 0 $0 20 Relocate Power Pole (Wood) $25,000.00 / EA 0 $0 21 Relocate Catch Basin $8,000.00 -/ EA 5 $40,000 22 Relocate Fire Hydrant $2,500.00 / FA 4 $10,000 23 Relocate Bus Bench $600.00 1 EA 1 $1,000 - 24 Relocate Monument Wall $5,000.00 / EA 1 $5,000 25 Relocate Utility Boxes $500.00 1 EA 22 $11,000 26 Relocate Main Water Valve $5,000.00 / FA 0 D $$0 27 Relocate Utility Vault $3,000.00 / EA 1 $3,0 28 Relocate Water Facility$200,000.00 / LS 1 $200,000 29 Relocate Electrical Facility $100,000.00 / LS 1 $100,000 30 Adjust Manhole to Grade_ $1,500.00 / FA 1 $2,000 31 Adust Water Meter $500.00 / EA 12 $6,000 32 Modify Driveway --j- $5,000.00 EA 9 $45,000 33 Earthwork $12.00 / CY 6,400 $77,000 34 Construct PCC Pavement - $15.00 / SF 0 $0 35 Construct AC Pavement $14.00 / SF 48,500 $679,000 36 Construct AC Overlay $3.00 / SF 0 $0 37Construct Slurry Seal $0.25 / SF 101,610 $25,000 38 Construct Striping &Markin $4.00 / LF- 2,350 $9,000 39 Construct AC Dike $7.00 / LF 0 $0 40 Construct Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 3,300 $99,000 41 Construct Concrete Barrier $50.00-1 LF 0 $0 42 Construct Median Curb $20.00--/ LF 950 - $19,000 43 Construct Median Concrete $10.00 / SF 0 $0 44 Constmct MediaNParkwa Landscapin $10.00 / SF 0 $0 45 Construct PCC Sidewalk $7.00-T -SF 14,700 $103,000 46 Construct Access Ramp $5,000.00 / EA 5 $25,000 47 Construct Retaining Wall $50.00 / SF 0 $0 48 Construct Storm Drain Main $100.00 / LF - 0 $0 49 Construct RCB $1,000.00 -/ LF -0-$0 50 Construct Headwall $5,000.00 / EA 1 0 $0 51 Construct Concrete V -Ditch $15.00 / LF 0 $0 52 Construct Bridge Widening $500.00 / SF 7,600 $3,800,000 53 Construct Parkway Landsca in lirri ation $10.00 / SF 26,150 $262,000 54 Construct Wall $70.00 / LF 0 $0 55 Building/Structure Demolition 1 Story) $10.00 / SF ;. " -" _ - $66,000 56 Traffic ConUol 8% - 1 $550,000 57 Drainage Items 10% 1 $743,000 58 SWPPP Plan and Implementation 6% 1 $490,000 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $9.624.000 Riuht-of-Wav 100 / SF 10,250 $1,025,000 Riaht-of-Wav Mana ement 5 / % $51,000 RIGHT-OF-WAY SUBTOTAL $1.076,000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & RIGHT-OF-WAY COST $10,700,000 Preliminary Project Development (10% of total Construction/RW cost) $1,070,000 Design Engineering/Administration Costs (15% of total ConstructionIRW cost) $1,605,000 Construction Engineering Costs/Administration (10% of total Construction/RW cost) $1,070,000 Conon enc 20% of Total ConstrudionIRW cost $2,140,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $16,585,000 dkostes6mates115 campus - bristol.xls FBF CONSULTING CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE JAMBOREE ROAD/SR-73 OVERCROSSING &: ateaamata02 jam base -brisla.xis 05/08/2008 By SC PROJECT TOTAL Item Number Item Code Item Description - Unit Cost EsBmaletl Quantifies Item Cosi I EARTHWORK 1.01 074017 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan LS $2,000 Lump Sum $2,000 1.02 074019 Pre are Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan LS $5,000 Lump Sum $5,000 1.03 074020 Water Pollution Control LS $31,000 Lump Sum $31,000 1.04 170101 Develop Water Supp LS $10,000 Lump Sum $10,000 1.05 190110 Lead Compliance Plan LS $10,000 Lump Sum $10,000 1.06 160101 Clearing and GrubbingLS $50,000 Lump Sum $50,000 1.07 190101 Roadway Excavation CY $25 3,500 $87,500 -Subtotal. $193500 2 ROADWAY ITEMS 2.01 153214 Remove Concrete Curb Median) LF $5 1,830 $9,150 2.02 153215 Remove Concrete (Curb and Gutter LF $8 1,330 $10,640 2.03 153218 Remove Concrete Sidewalk - SF $3 11,310 $33,930 2.04 Remove Median Hardscapa Area SF $2 5,680 $11,360 2.05 150608 Remove Chain Link Fence LF $$2 45 $675 2.06 160120 Remove Tree EA $500 6 $3,000 2.07 Remove Hand Rails EA $100 2 $200 2.08 Remove Concrete (Pad and Walls) EA $350 1 $350 2.09Remove Concrete Side Gutter LF $8 440 $3,520 2.10 153221 Remove Concrete Barrer& Fence LF $30 90 $2,700 2.11 Remove Concrete Cum Ramp EA $300 4 $1,200 2.12 150662 Remove Metal Beam Guard Rail LF $15 420 $6,300 2.13 204031 Transplant Palm Tree FA $ 4 $12,000 2.14 152431 Ad'ust Storm Drain Manhole to Grade EA $750 $750 1 $750 2.15 Adjust Water Vault Frame and Coverto Grade EA $2000 2 $4,000 2.16 - Relocate C' Street Li ht 9 EA $7,500 6 $45,000 2.17 Relocate Street Light Hand Hole and Conduit EA $2,900 6 $17.400 2.18 Relocate Back Ba Court Sign EA $2,500 - 2 $5,000 2.19 Exist Air Release Valve Canto be adjusted to grade by IRWD EA -EA-$1,000 $2,000 1 $2,000 2.20 Exist Telephone Manhole to be ad'usted to grade, by AT&T 1 $1,000 2.21 Exist Water Valve to be ad'usted to grade by IRWD EA $1,000 1 $1,000 2.22 Exist Electrical Vault to be adusled to gracle by SCE EA $3,000 i $3,000 2.23 Exist Electrical Pullbox to be adjusted to grace by SCE EA $900 1 $900 2.24 2.25 250201 260201 Class 2 Aggregate Subbase Class 2 Aggregate Base CY CY $70 $7$70 0 30 560 $2 ,100 $$2 ,200 2.26 390102 Asphalt Concrete (Type TON $ 810 $81,000 2.27 390171 Asphalt Concrete Base e A TONN$20 100 $9,000 2.28 Modred 8" Type C PCC Cum and Gutter LF... 400 $7,200 229 - 8" T e C PCC Cum and Gutter LF 760 $13,680 2.30 8" T e B PCC Curb LF 1,850 $27,750 2.31 Concrete Side Gutter LF 45 $900 2.32 Concrete Retainin Cum and Gutter LF 320 $19,200 2.33 510509Minor Concrete Median Pavin SF 3,800 $38,002.34 731521 Minor Concrete Sidewalk SF 9,800 $78,400 2.35 731623 Minor Concrete Cum Ramp EA 4 $4,000 2.36ModRed Concrete Barrier pe 26A and Chain Link Fence LF 100 $12,000 2.37 839701 Concrete Banner (Type 60) LF $75 450 $33,750 2.38 Type 6B Retaining Wall and Hand Railing EA $400,000 1 $400,000 2.39 Concrete Stairway and Hand Railing EA $50,000 1 $50,000 -Subtotal- $991255 3 DRAINAGE 3.01 150820 Remove Inlet EA $2,000 1 $2,000 3.02 510502 Minor Concrete Minor Structure CY $1,750 4 $7,000 3.03 620909 18"AP LF $250 26 $6,500 -Subtotal- $15500 4 SPECIALTY ITEMS 4.01 074026 Temporary Mulch CF 1.00 10000 $10,000 4.02 Temporary Median Drnnna a SwaleLS 10,000.00 1 $10,000 4.03 074028 TempoFiber Roll LF 5.00 5000 $25,000 4.04 074031 Temporary Gravel Bag Berm LF 20.00 5000 $100,000 4.05 074041 Street Swee in LS 50,000.00 1 $50,000 4.06 074038 Temporary Drainage Inlet Protection EA 250.00 20 $5,000 4.07 074033 Temporary Construction Entrance EA 3,000.00 2 $6,000 4.08 074028 Temporary Fiber Roll LF $5 1000 $5,000 4.09 074034 Temp raty, Cover SF $0 4000 $1,600 4.1 074032 Temporary Concrete Washout Facility EA $2,000 1 $2,000 4.11 Erosion Coo;ffl dro-seed SF - $1 15000 $15,000 4.12 200001 Highway PlantingLS $25,838 Lump Sum $25,838 4.13 204099 Plant Establishment Work 250 Das CT R/W On LS $12,000 Lump Sum $12,000 4.14 208731 8" CHDPE Pipe (Irrigation Sleeve) FT $24 150 $3,600 &: ateaamata02 jam base -brisla.xis 05/08/2008 By SC VBF CONSULTING CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE JAMBOREE ROADISR-73 OVERCROSSING d tes4maleW jamboree-bristd.xls 2 05/08/2008 By: SC PROJECT TOTAL Item Number Item Code Item Description Unit Cos[ Estimated quantifies Item Cost 4.15 208000 Irrigation System LS $31,198 Lump Sum $31,198 4.16 66208 Repair Existing Ingation System LS $500 Lump Sum $500 4.17 66230 Appy Pesticides LS $500 Lump Sum $500 4.18 999999 Mobhbaation LS $196,681 Lump Sum $196,681 -Subtotal- $232479 5 TRAFFIC ITEMS 5.01 120100 Construction Traffic Control System I LS I $M.8001 Lump Sum $177,800 5.02 Signal & Lighting Jamboree Road and Bristol Street LS 1 $80,0001 Lump Sum $80,000 5.03 Signal & Ughting Jamboree Road and Bristol Street North LS 1 $80,0001 Lump Sum $80,000 5.04 Lighting & Sign Illumination LS $0 Lum Sum p $0 5.05 Pavement Delineation $29,000 Lump Sum $29,000 5.06 Remove ExistingStripingLS $8,200 Lump Sum $8,200 5.07 861503 Mod' Lighting (Bridge) g 9 LS $61,500 Lump Sum $61,500 5.08 Remove Bride Mounted Overhead Sign LS 1 $5.0001 Lump Sum $5,000 5.09 Bridge Mounted Overhead S n LS $85,880 Lump Sum $85,880 5.1 Roadwa .S nae LS 1 $6,700 Lump Sum $6,700 -Subtotal- $534,080 6 STRUCTURAL ITEMS 6.01 Jamboree Road Bridge Widening LS 1 $2,000,000 Lump Sum $2,000,000 -Subtotal. $2,730,360 SUBTOTAL ROADWAY & STRUCTURAL ITEMS $4,464,695 10% Contingency $446,470 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $4,911,165 d tes4maleW jamboree-bristd.xls 2 05/08/2008 By: SC NEWPORT BEACH FAIRSHARE FEE PROGRAM UPDATE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES Location: Intersection 1149 MacArthur Blvd & Ford Rd/Bonita Canyon Dr Date: 08/07/2007 Mitigation: Add 3rd NB RT lane, Eliminate NB Free RT lane, Add NB RT lane Estimated by: P. Chao &zwtestimates149 mamnhur- ford -bonit A. DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE QUANTITY COST 1 Mobilization 10.00%$122,000 2 Clear& Grub $10,000.00. / AC 0.10 $1,000 3 Remove Striping $10.00 / LF 1,760 $18,000 4 Remove Curb & Gutter $30.00-1 LF 1,230 $37,000 5 Remove Median Curb $30.00 / LF 1,060 $32,000 6 Remove PCC Sidewalk and Median $7.00 / SF 19,650 $138,000 7 Remove Pavement $4.00 / SF 2,750 $11,000 8 Remove Wall - $10.00 / LF 0 $0 9 Remove Channel $15.00 / LF 0 $0 10 Remove/Replace Chain Link Fence $50.00 / LF 0 $0 11 Reconstruct Metal Beam Guard Rail $70.00 / LF0 $0 12 Remove & Relocate Tree $3,000.00 / EA 0 $0 13 Sawcut $1.00 / LF 2,290 $2,000 14 Relocate Street Light $7,500.00 / EA 5 $38,000 15 Relocate Traffic Signal System $300,000.00 / EA 0.5 $150,000 16 Relocate Freeway Sign 2 post - $1,000.00 1 EA 0 $0 17 Relocate Sin 1 Post) $300.00 / EA 3 $1,000 18 Reconstruct Overhead Sin $50,000.00 / EA 0 $0 19 Relocate Call Box $2,000.00 / EA 0 $0 20 Relocate Power Pole Wood $25,000.00 / EA 1 $25,000 21 Relocate Catch Basin $8,000.00 1 EA 1 $8,000 22 Relocate Fire Hydrant $2,500.00 / EA 2 $5,000 23 Relocate Bus Bench $600.00 / EA 0 $0 24 Relocate Monument Wall $5,000.00 / EA -/ 0 $0 25 Relocate Utility Boxes $500.00 EA 16 $8,000 26 Relocate Main Water Valve $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 27 Relocate Utility Vault $3,000.00 / EA 1 $3,000 28 Adjust Manhole to Grade $1,500.00 / EA 5 $8,000 29 Ad'ust Water Meter $500.00 / EA 0 $0 30 Ad'ust Water Valve $500.00 / EA 0 $0 31 Adjust Minor Above Ground Utilites $500.00 / EA 0 - $0 32 Modify Driveway $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 33 Earthwork $12.00-T CY 800 $10,000 34 Construct PCC Pavement $15.00 / SF 0 $0 35 Construct AC Pavement $14.00 / SF 10,400 $146,000 36 Construct AC Overlay $3.00 / SF 0 $0 37 Construct Slurry Seal $0.25 / SF 117,000 $29,000 38 Construct Striping & Marking $4.00 / LF 1,760 $7,000 39 Construct AC Dike $7.00 / LF 0 $0 40 Construct Curb &Gutter$30.00 / LF 1,230 $37,000 41 Construct Concrete Barrier $50.00 / LF 0 $0 42 Construct Median Curb $20.00 / LF 1,060 $21,000 43 Construct Median Concrete $10.00 / SF 1,250 $13,000 44 Construct Median/Parkwa Landscaping $10.00 / SF $0 45 Construct PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 14,760 $103,000 46 Construct Access Ramp $5,000.00 / EA 4 $20,000 47 Construct Retaining Wall $50.00 / SF 0 $0 48 Construct Storm Drain Main $100.00 / LF 0 $0 49 Construct RCB $1,000.00 / LF 0 $0 50 Construct Headwall $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 51 Construct Concrete V -Ditch $15.00 / LF 0 $0 52 Construct Bridge Widening $500.00 / SF 0 $0 53 Construct Parkway Landscaping/Irrigation $10.00 / SF 0 $0 54 Construct Wall $70.00 / LF -0 -so 55 Building/Structure Demolition 1 Story) $10.00 / SF -0 -so 56 Traffic Control 8% 1 $70,000 57 Drainage Items 10% 1 $94,000 58 SWPPP Plan and Implementation 6% 1 $62,000 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL - $1,219,000 Right -of -Way - 1(0 / SF 4,800 $480,000 Ri ht-of-Wa Mana ement 5 / % $24,000 RIGHT-OF•WAY SUBTOTAL $504.000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & RIGHT-OF-WAY COST Preliminary Project Development (10% of total Construction/RW cost) Design Engineering/Administration Costs (15% of total Construction/RW cost) Construction Engineering Costs/Administration (10% of total Construction/RW cost) Contin 20%of Total Construction/RW cost $1,723,000 $173,000 $259,000 $173,000 $345,000 VCO2 TOTAL ROCOSTS $2,673,000 &zwtestimates149 mamnhur- ford -bonit A. NEWPORT BEACH FAIRSHARE FEE PROGRAM UPDATE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES Location: Intersection #50 MacArthur Blvd & San Joaquin Hills Rd - Date: 08/0712007 Mitigation: Add 3rd SB LT, 3rd EB LT, EB RT, NB T, 2 WB RT, Eliminate NB RT, WB Free RT Estimated by: P. Chao/J. McNeill OcostesllmatesW ma=thur -sar foaqum.xls DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE QUANTITY COST 1 Mobilization 10.00% 1 $179,000 2 Clear &Grub $10,000.00 / AC 0.15 $2,000 3 Remove Striping $10.00 / LF 2,880 $29,000 4 Remove Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 1,735 $52,000 5 Remove Median Curb $30.00 / LF 1,415 $42,000 6 Remove PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 18,328 $128,000 7 Remove Pavement $4.00/ SF 1,250 $5,000 8 Remove Wall $10.00 LF 0 $0 9 Remove Channel $15.00 / LF 0 $0 10 Remove/Replace Chain Link Fence $50.00 / LF 0 $0 11 Reconstruct Metal Beam Guard Rail -& $70.00 / LF 0 $0 12 Remove Relocate Tree - $3,000.00 / EA 11 $33,000 13 Sawcut $1.00 / LF 2,880 $3,000 14 Relocate Street Light $7,500.00 / EA 11 $83,000 15 Relocate Traffic Signal System $300,000.00 / EA 1 $225,000 16 Relocate Freeway Sign (2 post) $1,000.00 / EA 0 $0 17 Relocate Sin 1 Post $300.00 / EA 8 $2,000 18 Reconstruct Overhead Sign $50,000.00 / EA 0 $0 19 Relocate Call Box $2,000.00 / EA 0 $0 20 Relocate Power Pole Steel $25,000.00 / EA 1 $25,000 21 Relocate Catch Basin $8,000.00 / EA 8 $64,000 22 Relocate Fire Hydrant $2,500.00 / EA 0 $0 23 Relocate Bus Bench $600.00 / EA 0 $ 0 24 Relocate Monument Wall $5,000.00 / EA 2 $10,0$0 25 Relocate UtilityBoxes $500.00 / EA 6 $3,000 26 Relocate Main Water Valve $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 27 Relocate Utility Vault $3,000.00 / EA 0 $0 28 Ad'ust Manhole to Grade $1,500.00 / EA 1 $2,000 29 Adjust Water Meter $500.00 / EA 0 $0 30 Adjust Water Valve $500.00 / EA 8 $4,000 31 Adjust Minor Above Ground Utilities $500.00 / EA 0 $0 32 ModifyDriveway$5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 33 Earthwork $12.00 / CY 2,779 $33,000 34 Construct PCC Pavement $15.00 / SF 0 $0 35 Construct AC Pavement $14.00 / SF 17,025 $238,000 36 Construct AC Overlay $3.00 / SF 0 $0 37 Construct Slur Seat $0.25 / SF 122,100 $31,000 38 Construct Striping & Markin2 $4.00 / LF 2,880 $12,000 39 Construct AC Dike $7.00 / LF 0 $0 40 Construct Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 1,735 $52,000 41 Construct Concrete Barrier $50.00 / LF 1 0 $0 42 Constmct Median Curb $20.00 / LF 1,415 $26,000 43 Construct Median Concrete $10.00 / SF 0 $0 44 Construct Median/Parkwa landscaping $10.00 / SF 0 $0 45 Construct PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 20,447 $143,000 46 Construct Access Ram $5,000.00 I EA 6 $30,000 47 Construct Retaining Wall $50.00 / SF 0 $0 48 Construct Storm Drain Main $100.00 / LF 0 $g 49 Construct RCB $1,000.00 / LF 0 $0 50 Construct Headwall $5,000.00 ! EA 0 $0 51 Construct Concrete V -Ditch $15.00 / LF 0 $0 52 Construct Bridge Widening $500.00 / SF 0 $0 53 Construct Median/Parkway Landscaping $10.00 / SF g $0 54 Construct Wall - $70.00 / LF 0 $0 55 Building/Structure Demolition (1 Story) $10.00 / SF 0 0 56 Traffic Control 8°/ 1 $102,000 57 Drainage Items 10% 0% 1 $138,000 58 SWPPP Plan and Implementation 1 $91,000 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $1,789,000 Riaht-of-Wav 100 / SF 12,240 $1,224,000 Right -of -Way Management 5 / % $61,000 RIGHT-OF-WAYSUBTOTAL $1285000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION -9 RIGHT-OF-WAY COST $3,074,000 Preliminary Project Development (10% of total Construction/RW cost) $308,000 Design Engineering/Administration Costs (15% of total Construction/RW cost) $462,000 Construction Engineering Costs/Administration (10% of total Construction/RW cost) $308,000 Contin enc 20% of Total Construction/RW cost $615,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $4,767,000 OcostesllmatesW ma=thur -sar foaqum.xls NEWPORT BEACH FAIRSHARE FEE PROGRAM UPDATE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES Location: Location A Coast Hwy- From Newport Boulevard to Dover Street Date: 08/07/2007 Mitigation: Construct Arterial Estimated by: C. Davis d:lcostestimalesta coast - newport to dwer.xis DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE QUANTITY COST 1 Mobilization 10.00% $558,000 2 Clear & Grub $10,000.00 / AC 0.00 $p 3 Remove Striping $10.00 / LF 0 $0 4 Remove Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 5,475 $164,000 5 Remove Median Curb $30.00 / LF 0 $0 6 Remove PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 35,270 $247,000 7 Remove Pavement $4.00 / SF 64,710 $259,000 8 Remove Wall $10.00 / LF 0 $0 9 Remove Channel $15.00 / LF 0 $0 10 Remove/Replace Chain Link Fence $50.00 / LF 0 $0 11 Reconstruct Metal Beam Guard Rail $70.00 / LF0 $0 12 Remove 8 Relocate Tree $3,000.00 / EA 0 $0 13 Sawcut $1.00 / LF 0 $p 14 Install Street Light $7,500.00 / EA 40 $300,000 15 Relocate Traffic Signal System $300,000.00 / EA 1 $300,000 16 Relocate Freeway Sign (2 post) $1,000.00 / FA 0 $0 17 Relocate Sign (1 Post) $300.00 / EA 0 $0 18 Reconstruct Overhead Sin $50,000.00 / EA 0 $0 19 Relocate Call Box $2,000.00 / EA 0 $0 20 Relocate Power Pole (Wood) $25,000.00 / EA 6 $150,000 21 Relocate Catch Basin $8,000.00 / EA 6 $48,000 22 Relocate Fire Hydrant $2,500.00 / EA 0 $0 23 Relocate Bus Bench $600.00 / EA 0 $0 24 Relocate Monument Wall $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 25 Relocate Uutty Boxes $500.00 / FA 0 $0 26 Relocate Main Water Valve $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 27 Relocate Utility Vault $3,000.00 / EA 8 $24,000 28 Adjust Manhole to Grade $1,500.00 -IEA 0 $0 29 Adjust Water Meter $500.00 / EA 0 $0 30 Adjust Water Valve $500.00 / EA 0 $0 31 Adjust Minor Above Ground Utilities $500.00 / EA 0 $0 32 Modi Driveway $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 33 Earthwork $12.00 / CY 0 $0 34 Construct PCC Pavement $15.00 / -SF 0 $0 35 Construct ACPavement $14.00 / SF 70,800 $991,000 36 Construct AC Overlay $3.00 ! SF 0 $0 37 Construct Slurry Seal $0.25 / SF 0 $0 30 Construct Striping & Marking $4.00 / LF 5,330 $21,00 39 Construct AC Dike $7 .00 / LF 0 $0 $ 40 Construct Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 6,008 $180,000 41 Construct Concrete Barrier $50.00 / LF 0 $0 42 Construct Median Curb $20.00 / LF 13,100 $262,000 43 Construct Median Concrete $10.00 / SF 7,480 $75,000 44 Construct Median/Parkway Landscaping $10.00 / SF 50,000 $500,000 45 Construct PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 46,600 $326,000 46 Construct Access Ramp $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 47 Construct Retaining Wall . I SF 0 $0 48 Construct Storm Drain Main $100.00 / LF 0 $p 49 Construct RCB $1,000.00 / LF 0 $0 50 Construct Headwall $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 51 Construct Concrete V -Ditch $15.00 / LF 0 $0 52 Construct Bride Widenin9 $500.00 / SF 0 $0 53 Construct Parkway Landscaping/Irrigation $10.00 I SF 0 $0 54 Construct Wall $70.00 / LF 0 $0 55 Building/Structure Demolition (1 Story) $10.00 / SF 14,000 $140,000 56 Traffic Control 8% 1 $319,000 57 Drainage Items 10%- 1 $431,000 58 SWPPP Plan and Implementation 6% 1 $284,000 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $5,579.000 Right -of -Way 100/ SF 79,160 $7,916,000 Right -of -Way Mana ement 5 / % $396,000 RIGHT-OF-WAY SUBTOTAL $8 312 000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & RIGHT-OF-WAY COST $13,891,000 Preliminary Project Development (10% of total Construction/RW cost) $1,390,000 Design Engineering/Administration Costs (15% of total Construction/RW cost) $2,084,000 Construction Engineering Costs/Administration (10% of total Construction/RW cost) $1,390,000 Contin an 20% of Total Construction/RW cost $2,779,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $21,534,000 d:lcostestimalesta coast - newport to dwer.xis NEWPORT BEACH FAIRSHARE FEE PROGRAM UPDATE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES Location: Location B Irvine Ave Date: 08/07/2007 Mitigation: Widen Irvine Ave from University Drive to Mesa Street Estimated by: S. Foster d9costestimates% irvine avenue (university to mesa).x DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE QUANTITY COST 1 Mobilization 10.00% $2,000Min $332,000 2 Clear &Grub $10,000.00 / AC 0.11 $1,000 3 Remove Striping $10.00 / LF - 2,040 $20,000 4 Remove Curb &Gutter $30.00 / LF 3,330 $100,000. 5 Remove Median Curb $30.00 / LF 1,100 $33,000 6 Remove PCC Sidewalk $7.00 1 SF 11,580 $81,000 7 Remove Pavement $4.00 / SF 0 $0 8 Remove Wall $10.00 / LF 500 $5,000 9 Remove Channel $15.00 / LF 0 $0 10 Remove/Replace Chain Link Fence $50.00 / LF 100 $5,000 11 Reconstruct Metal Beam Guard Rail $70.00 / LF 0 $0 12 Remove & Relocate Tree $3,000.00 / EA 22 $66,000 13 Sawcut $1.00 / LF 4,460 $4,500 14 Relocate Street Light $7,500.00 / EA 6 $45,000 15 Relocate Traffic Signal System $300,000.00 / EA 1.0$300,000. 16 Relocate Freewa Sin 2 post $1,000.00 / EA 0 $0 17 Relocate Sign 1 Post) $300.00 / FA 14 $4,200 18 Reconstruct Overhead Sin $50,000.00 / EA 0 $0 19 Relocate Call Box $2,000.00 / EA 0 $0 20 Relocate Power Pole $25,000.00 1 EA 15 $375,000 21 Relocate Catch Basin $8,000.00 / EA 3 $24,000 22 Relocate Fire Hydrant $2,500.00 / EA 10 $25,000- 23 Relocate Bus Shelter $2,000.00 / EA 3 $6,000 24 Relocate Monument Sin $5,000.00 / EA 3 $15,000 25 Relocate Utility Boxes $500.00 / FA 14 $7,000 26 Relocate Main Water Valve $5,000.00 / FA 6 $30,000 27 Relocate Utility Vault $3,000.00 / EA 13 $39,000 28 Adjust Manhole to Grade - $1,500.00 / EA 6 $9,000 29 Adjust Water Meter $500.00 I EA 17 $8,500 30 Adjust Water Valve $500.00 / EA 9 $4,500 31 Adjust Minor Above Ground Utilities $500.00 / EA 5 $3,000 32 Modify Driveway - $5,000.00 / EA 10 $50,000 33 Earthwork $12.00 / (;y 4,910 $59,000 34 Construct PCC Pavement $15.00 / SF 0 $0 35 Construct AC Pavement $14.00 / SF 39,130 $548,000 36 Constmct AC Overt $3.00 I SF 0 $0 37 luonstruct Slurry Seal $0.25 I SF 95,500 $24,000 38Construct Striping & Markin $4.00 / LF 2,070 $8,000 39 Constmct AC Dike $7.00 / LF 0 $0 40 Construct Curb & Gutter -Concmte $30.00 / LF 4,130 $124,000 41 -Construct Barrier $50.00 / LF 0 $0 42 Construct Median Curb - $20.00 / LF 0 $0 43 Construct Median Concrete $10.00 / SF 0 $0 44 Construct Median/Parkwa -Landscaping $10.00 I SF 0 $0 45 Construct PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 32,820 $230,000 46 Construct Access Ramp $5,000.00 / FA 16 $80,000 47 Construct Retaining Wall $50.00 / SF 250 $13,000 48 ConstructStor Construct Storm Drain Main $100.00 / LF 5 $1,000 49 Construct RCB $1,000.00 / LF 0 $0 50 Construct Headwall $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 51 Construct Concrete V -Ditch $15.00 / LF 0 $0 52 Construct Bride Wide nin $500.00 / SF 0 $0 53 Construct Wall $70.00 / LF 300 $21,000 54 Building/Structure Demolition 1 Ste ) $10.00 / SF - 610 $6,000 55 Traffic Control 8% 1 $190,000 56 Drainage Items 10% 1 $256,000 57 SW PPP Plan and Implementation 6% 1 $168,000 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $3,320,700 Ri htof-Wa 100 / SF 21,880 $2,188,000 Right -of -Way Management 5 / % $109,000 RIGHT-OF-WAY SUBTOTAL $2,297,000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & RIGHT-OF-WAY COST $5,618,000 Preliminary Project Development (10% of total Construction/RW cost) $562,000 Design Engineering/Administration Costs (15% of total Construction/RW cost) $843,000 Construction Engineering Costs/Administration (10% of total Construction/RW cost) $562,000 Contin en 20%of Total Construction/RW cost $1,124,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $8,709,000 d9costestimates% irvine avenue (university to mesa).x NEWPORT BEACH FAIRSHARE FEE PROGRAM UPDATE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES Location: Location C Bayside Dr & Coast Hwy Date- 08/07/2007 Mitigation: Add 4th EB T Lane Estimated by: J. McNeill Ocostesbmateslc bayside-wast.xls DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE QUANTITY COST 1 Mobilization 10.00% $164,000 2 Clear & Grub $10,000.00 / AC 0.25 $3,000 3 Remove Striping $10.00 / LF 1,570 $16,000 4 Remove Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 1,770 $53,000 5 Remove Median Curb $30.00 / LF $0 6 Remove PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 14,220 $100,000 7 Remove Pavement $4.00 / SF 4,090 $16,000 8 Remove Wall $10.00 / LF '- 380 $4,000 9 Remove Channel $15.00 / LF 0 $0 10 Remove/Replace Chain Link Fence $50.00 / LF 0 $0 11 Reconstruct Metal Beam Guard Rail $70.00 / LF 0 $0 12 Remove & Relocate Tree $3,000.00 / EA 12 $36,000 13 Sawcut $1.00 / LF 1,770 $2,000 14 Relocate Street Light $7,500.00 / EA 17 $128,000 15 Relocate Traffic Signal S stem $300,000.00 / EA 0.5 $150,000 16 Relocate Freeway Sign (2 post) $1,000.00 / EA 0 $0 17 Relocate Sign (1 Post) $300.00 / EA 3 $1,000 18 Reconstruct Overhead Sign $50,000.00 / EA 0 - $0 19 Relocate Call Box $2,000.00 / EA -0 -so 20 Relocate Power Pole (Wood) $15,000.00 / EA 0 $0 21 Relocate Catch Basin $8,000.00 / EA 2 $16,000 22 Relocate Fire Hydrant $2,500.00 / EA 2 $5,000 23 Relocate Bus Bench $600.00 / EA 0 $0 24 Relocate Monument Wall $5,000.00 / EA 2 $10,000 25 Relocate Utility Boxes $500.00 / EA 7 $4,000 26 Relocate Main Water Valve $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 27 Relocate Utility Vault $3,000.00 / EA 1 $3,000 28 Adjust Manhole to Grade $1,500.00 / EA 0 $0 29 Adjust Water Meter $500.00 / EA4 - $2,000 30 Adjust Water Valve $500.00 / EA 1 - $1,000 31 Adjust Minor Above Ground Utilities $500.00 / EA 0 $0 32 Modify Driveway$5,000.00 / EA 4 $20,000 33 Earthwork $12.00 / CY 1,600 $19,000 34 Construct PCC Pavement $15.00 / SF 0 $0 35 Construct AC Pavement $14.00 /. SF 18,670 $261,000 36 Construct AC Overlay $3.00 / SF 0 $0 37 Construct Slurry Seal $0.25 / SF 0 $0 38 Construct Striping & Marking $4.00 / LF 1,570 $6,000 39 Construct AC Dike $7.00 / LF 0 $p 40 Construct Curb &Gutter $30.00 / LF 1,700 $51,000 41 Construct Concrete Barrier $50.00 / LF 0 $0 42 Construct Median Curb $20.00 / LF 0 $0 43 Construct Median Concrete $10.00 / SF 0 $0 44 Construct Median/Parkway Landscaping $10.00 / SF 0 $0 45 Construct PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 13,810 $97,000 46 Construct Access Ram $5,000.00 / EA 4 $20,000 47 Construct Retaining Wall $50.00 / SF 3,000 $150,000 48 Construct Storm Drain Main $100.00 / LF 0 $0 49 Construct RCB $1,000.00 / LF 0 $0 50 Construct Headwall $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 51 Construct Concrete V -Ditch $15.00 / LF 0 $0 52 Construct Bride Widening $500.00 / SF 1 $1,000 53 Construct Parkway Landscapin Irri ation $10.00 / SF -0 -so 54 Construct Wall $70.00 / LF -0 -so 55 Building/Structure Demolition 1 Story) $10.00 / SF 0 $0 56 Traffic Control 8% 1 $94,000 57 Drainage Items 10% 1 $127,000 58 SWPPP Plan and Implementation 6% 1 $84,000 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $1,644,000 Right -of -Way 100 / SF 11,750 $1,175,000 Right -of -Way Management 5 / % $59,000 RIGHT-OF-WAY SUBTOTAL - $1234000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & RIGHT-OF-WAY COST Preliminary Project Development (10% of total Construction/RW cost) Design Engineering/Administration Costs (15% of total Construction/RW cost) Construction Engineering Costs/Administration (10% of total Construction/RW cost) Contin en 20 % of Total Construction/RW cost $2,878,000 $288,000 $432,000 $288,000 $576,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $4,462,000 Ocostesbmateslc bayside-wast.xls NEWPORT BEACH FAIRSHARE FEE PROGRAM UPDATE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES Location: Location F Placentia Ave between Hospital Road & Superior Date: 08/07/2007 Mitigation: Widen Placentia Between Hospital Rd and Superior Ave to Secondary Cross -Section Estimated by: S. Foster d9costesflr, O SV plamntia avenue.As DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE QUANTITY COST 1 Mobilization 10.00% 1 $164,000 2 Clear &Grub $10,000.00 I AC 0.40 $4,000 3 Remove Striping $10.00 / LF 950 $10,000 4 Remove Curb & Gutter $30.00 I LF 750 $23,000 5 Remove Median Curb $30.00 / LF 0 $0 6 Remove PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 4,850 $34,000 7 Remove Pavement $4.00 / SF 9,750 $39,000 8 Remove Wall $10.00 / LF 0 $0 9 Remove Channel $15.00 / LF 0 $0 10 Remove/Replace Chain Link Fence $50.00 / LF 0 $p 11 Reconstruct Metal Beam Guard Rail $70.00 -1L F 0 $0 12 Remove & Relocate Tree $3,000.00 / EA 28 $84,000 13 Sawcut $1.00 / LF 1,500 $1,500 14 Relocate Street Light $7,500.00 / EA 8 $60,000 15 Relocate Traffic Signal System $300,000.00 / EA 1.0 $300,000 16 Relocate Freeway Sin 2 post $1,000.00 / EA 0 $0 17 Relocate Sign 1 Post $300.00 / FA 5 $1,500 18 Reconstruct Overhead Sign $50,000.00 / EA 0 $0 19 Relocate Call Box $2,000.00 / EA 0 - $0 20 Relocate Power Pole(Wood)$25,000.00 / EA 3 $75,000 21 Relocate Catch Basin $8,000.00 / EA 2 $16,000 22 Relocate Fire Hydrant $2,500.00 / EA 2 $5,000 23 Relocate Bus Bench $600.00 / EA 1 - $1,000 24 Relocate Monument Sin $5,000.00 / EA 1 $5,000 25 Relocate Utility Boxes $500.00 / EA 1 $500 26 Relocate Main Water Valve $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 27 Relocate Utili Vault $3,000.00 I EA 5 $15,000 28 Adjust Manhole to Grade $1,500.00 / EA 2 $3,000 29 Adjust Water Meter $500.00 / EA 2 $1,000 30 Adjust Water Valve $500.00 / EA 0 $0 31 Adjust Minor Above Ground Utilities $500.00 / EA 0 $0 32 Modify Driveway $5,000.00 / EA 4 $20,000 33 Earthwork $12.00 / CY 1,200 $14,000 34 Construct PCC Pavement $15.00 / SF 0 $0 35 Construct AC Pavement $14.00 / SF 17,850 $250,000 36 Construct AC Overlay $3.00 / SF 0 $0 37 Construct Slurry Seal $0.25 / SF 32,350 $8,000 38 Construct Striping & Marking $4.00 / LF 950 $4,000 39 Construct AC Dike $7.00 / LF 0 $0 40 Construct Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 1,570 $47,000 41 Construct Concrete Barrier $50.00 / LF 0 $0 42 Construct Median Curb $20.00 / LF 0 $0 43 Construct Median Concrete $10.00 / SF 0 $0 44 Construct Median/Parkway Landscaping $10.00 / SF 0 $0 45 Construct PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 18,500 $130,000 46 Construct Access Ram $5,000.00 / EA 4 $20,000 47 Construct Retaining Wall $50.00--i SF 0 $0 48 Construct Storm Drain Main $100.00 / LF 0 $0 49 Construct RCB $1,000.00 I LF 0 $0 50 Construct Headwall $5,000.00 / EA 0 $p 51 Construct Concrete V -Ditch $15.00 / LF 0 $0 52 Construct Bridge Widening $500.00 / SF 0 $0 53 Construct Parkway Landscaping/Irrigation $10.00 / SF 0 $0 54 Construct Wall $70.00 / LF 0 $0 55 Building/Structure Demolition 1 Story) $10.00 / SF -0 -so 56 Traffic Control 8%1 $94,000 57 Draina a Items 10% 1 $127,000 58 SWPPP Plan and Implementation 6% 1 $84,000 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $1,640,500 Ri ht-of-Wa 100 / SF 13,800 $1,380,000 Ri ht-of-Wa Mana ement - 5 / % $69,000 RIGHT-OF-WAY SUBTOTAL $1449000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & RIGHT-OF-WAY COST $3,090,000 Preliminary Project Development (10% of total Construction/RW cost) $309,000 Design Engineering/Administration Costs (15% of total Construclion(RW cost) $464,000 Construction Engineering Costs/Administration (10% of total Construction/RW cost) $309,000 Contingency (20% of Total Construction/RW cost $618,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $4,790,000 d9costesflr, O SV plamntia avenue.As NEWPORT BEACH FAIRSHARE FEE PROGRAM UPDATE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES Location: Location G 15th Street between Placentia Ave to Monrovia Date: 08/07/2007 Mitigation: Widen 15th Street to a 4 lane Secondary Cross -Section Estimated by: S. Foster Newport Beach Interseclions.xls d:kostesumateslg 15th sbBLxls DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE QUANTITY COST 1 Mobilization 10.00% $242,000 2 Clear & Grub $10,000.00 / AC 1 $5,000 3 Remove Striping $10.00 / LF 1,270 $13,000 4 Remove Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 1,270 $38,000 5 Remove Median Curb $30.00 / LF 0 $0 6 Remove PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 260 $2,000 7 Remove Pavement $4.00 / SF 14,100 $56,000 8 Remove Wall$10.00 / LF 510 $5,000 9 Remove Channel $15.00 / LF 0 $0 10 Remove/Replace Chain Link Fence $50.00 / LF 600 $30,000 11 Reconstruct Metal Beam Guard Rail $70.00 / LF 0 $0 12 Remove & Relocate Tree $3,000.00 / EA 10 $30,000 13 Sawcut $1.00 / LF 1,270 $1,300 14 Relocate Street Light $7,500.00 / EA 2 $15,000 15 Relocate Traffic Signal System- $300,000.00 / EA 0.5 $150,000 16 Relocate Freeway Sign 2 post $1,000.00 / EA 0 $0 17 Relocate Sign 1 Post $300.00 / EA 3 $900 18 Reconstruct Overhead Sin $50,000.00 / EA 0 $0 19 Relocate Call Box $2,000.00 / EA 0 $0 20 Relocate Power Pole wooden $25,000.00 / EA 10 $250,000 21 Relocate Catch Basin$8,000.00 / EA 2 $16,000 22 Relocate Fire Hydrant $2,500.00 / EA 1 $2,500 23 Relocate Bus Bench $600.00 / EA 0 $0 24 Relocate Monument Sin $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 25 Relocate Utility Boxes - $500.00 I EA 0 $0 26 Relocate Main Water Valve $5,000.00 / EA. 1 $5,000 27 Relocate Utility Vault $3,000.00 I EA 1 $3,000 28 Adjust Manhole to Grade - $1,500.00 1 EA 5 $8,000 29 Adjust Water Meter $500.00 / EA 9 $4,500 30 Adjust Water Valve $500.00 / EA 0 - $0 31 Adjust Minor Above Ground Utilities $500.00 / EA 0 $0 32 Modify Driveway $5,000.00 / EA 1 - $5,000 33 Earthwork $12.00 / CY 3,200 $38,000 34 Construct PCC Pavement $15.00 / SF 0 $0 35 Construct AC Pavement $14.00 / SF 30,100 $421,000 36 Construct AC Overlay - $3.00 / SF 0 $0 37 Construct Slurry Seal ' $0.25 / SF 49,230 $12,000 38 Construct Striping & Marking $4.00 / LF 1,270 $5,000 39 Construct AC Dike $7.00 I LF 0 $0 40 Construct Curb &Gutter$30.00 / LF 1,310 $39,000 41 Construct Concrete Barrier - $50.00 / LF 0 $0 42 Construct Median Curb $20.00 I LF 0 $0 43 Construct Median Concrete $10.00 / SF 0 $0 44 Construct Median/Parkway Landscaping $10.00 / SF 0 $0 45 Construct PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 10,000 $70,000 46 Construct Access Ramp $5,000.00 / EA 4 $20,000 47 Construct Retaining Wall $50.00 / SF 0 $0 48 Construct Sic" Drain Main $100.00 / LF 0 $0 49 Construct RCB $1,000.00 / LF 0 $0 50 Construct Headwall $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 51 Construct Concrete V -Ditch $15.00 / LF 0 $0 52 Construct Bridge Widening $500.00 / SF 0 $0 53 Construct Parkway Landscaping/irrigation $10.00 / SF 0 $0 54 Construct Wall $70.00 / LF 510 $36,000 55 Building/Structure Demolition Mobile Home $30,000.00 / EA 15 $450,000 56 Traffic Control 8% 1 $138,000 57 Drainage Items 1 10% - 1 $187,000 58 SWPPP Plan and Implementation 6% 1 $123,000 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $2,421,200 Right -of -Way 100 / SF 13,050 $1,305,000 Riaht-of-Wav Mana ement 5 / % $65;000 RIGHT-OF-WAY SUBTOTAL $1,370,000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & RIGHT-OF-WAY COST Preliminary Project Development (10% of total Construction/RW cost) Design Engineering/Administration Costs (15% of total Construclion/RW cost) Construction Engineering Costs/Administration (10% of total Construction/RW cost) Contingency 20% of Total Construction/RW cost $3,792,000 $380,000 $569,000 $380,000 $759,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $5,880,000 Newport Beach Interseclions.xls d:kostesumateslg 15th sbBLxls NEWPORT BEACH FAIRSHARE FEE PROGRAM UPDATE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES Location: Location H MacArthur Blvd between Sly of San Miguel to Coast Hwy Date: 08/07/2007 Mitigation: Narrow median on MacArthur Blvd to provide a 6 -lane Major Estimated by: J. McNeill DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE QUANTITY COST 1 Mobilization 10.00% 1 $172,000 2 Clear & Grub $10,000.00 / AC 0.90 $9,000 3 Remove Striping $10.00 / LF 2,441 $24,000 4 Remove Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 0 $0 5 Remove Median Curb $30.00 / LF 5,300 $159,000 6 Remove PCC in Median $7.00 / SF 14,365 $101,000 7 Remove Pavement $4.00 / SF 3,201 $13,000 8 Remove Wall $10.00 / LF 0 $0 9 Remove Channel $15.00 / LF 0 $0 10 Remove/Replace Chain Link Fence $50.00 / LF 0 $0 11 Reconstruct Metal Beam Guard Rail $70.00 I LF 0 $0 12 Remove & Relocate Tree $3,000.00 / EA 0 $0 13 Sawcut $1.00 / LF 3,760 $3,800 14 Relocate Street Light $7,500.00 / EA 0 $0 15 Relocate Traffic Signal System $300,000.00-T EA 0.0 $0 16 Relocate Freeway Sin 2 post $1,000.00 / EA -4-$4,000 17 Relocate Sign 1 Post $300.00 / EA 4 $1,200 18 Reconstruct Overhead Sign $50,000.00 / EA 0 $0 19 Relocate Call Box $2,000.00 / EA 0 $0 20 Relocate Power Pole $15,000.00 / EA 0 $0 21 Relocate Catch Basin $8,000.00 / EA 1 $8,000 22 Relocate Fire Hydrant $2,500.00 / EA 0 $0 23 Relocate Bus Bench $600.00 / EA -0 -so 24 Relocate Monument Sin $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 25 Relocate Utility Boxes $500.00 / EA 0 $0 26 Relocate Main Water Valve $5.000.00--/ EA - 0 - $0 27 Relocate Utility Vault $3,000.00 / EA 3 $9,000 28 Adjust Manhole to Grade $1,500.00 / EA 1 $2,000 29 Adjust Water Meter $500.00 / EA 0 $0 30 Ad Water Valve $500.00 / EA 0 $0 31 Adjust Minor Above Ground Utilities $500.00 / EA 0 $0 32 Modi Drivewa $5,000.00 / EA - 0 $0 33 Earth Work $12.00 / CY 4,450 $53,000 34 Construct PCC Pavement i $15.00 / SF 0 - $0 35 Construct AC Pavement $14.00 / SF 42,357 $593,000 36 Construct AC Overiay $3.00 / SF 0 $0 37 Construct Slurry Seat $0.25 / SF 0 $0 38 Construct Striping & Marking $4.00 / LF 2,367 $9,000 39 Construct AC Dike $7.00 / LF 0 $0 40 Construct Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 0 $0 41 Construct Concrete Barrier $50.00 / LF 0 $0 42 Construct Median Curb $20.00 / LF 4,252 $85,000 43 Construct Median Concrete $10.00 / SF 12,917 $129,000 44 Construct Median/Parkway Landscaping $10.00 / ISF 2,772 $28,000 45 Construct PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 0 $0 46 Construct Access Ramp $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 47 Construct Retaining Wall $50.00 / SF 0 $0 48 Construct Storm Drain Main $100.00 / LF 0 $0 49 Construct RCB $1,000.00 / LF 0 $0 50 Construct Headwall $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 51 Construct Concrete V -Ditch $15.00 / LF 0 $0 52 Construct Bridge Widening $500.00 / SF 0 $0 53 Construct Parkway Landsca in /irri ation $10.00 / SF -0 -so 54 Construct Wall $70.00 / LF 0 $0 55 Building/Structure Demolition 1 Story) $10.00 / SF 0 $0 56 Traffic Control 8% 1 $98,000 57 Drainage Items 10% 1 $133,000 58 SWPPP Plan and Implementation 6% 1 $88,000 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $1,722,000 Ri ht -of -Way 100 / SF $0 Right -of -Way Management 5 / "/ $0 RIGHT-OF-WAY SUBTOTAL $0 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & RIGHT-OF-WAY COST $1,722,000 Preliminary Project Development (10% of total Construcfion/RW cost) $173,000 Design Engineering/Administration Costs (15% of total Construction/RW cost) $259,000 Construction Engineering Costs/Administration (10% of total Construction/RW cost) $173,000 Contin enc 20% of Total Construction/RW cost $345,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $2,672,000 NEWPORT BEACH FAIRSHARE FEE PROGRAM UPDATE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES Location: Location J Bluff Rd & 17th Street Date: 08/07/2007 Mitigation: Add NB Right Tum, NB Left Tum, WB Thru, WB Left Tum, EB Thru Right Estimated by: P. Chao dAmstestimatesy bluff-17th.xis DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE QUANTITY COST 1 Mobilization 10.00% $96,000 2 Clear & Grub $10,000.00 / AC 1.00 $10,000 3 Remove Striping $10.00 I LF 0 $0 4 Remove Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF- $0 5 Remove Median Curb $30.00 / LF 0 $0 6 Remove PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 0 $0 7 Remove Pavement $4.00 / SF 0 $p 8 Remove Wall $10.00 LF 0 $0 9 Remove Channel $15.00 / LF 0 $0 10 Remove/Replace Chain Link Fence $50.00 / LF 0 $0 11 Reconstruct Metal Beam Guard Rail $70.00 / LF 0 $0 12 Remove & Relocate Tree $3,000.00 / EA 0 $0 13 Sawcut $1.00 / LF 60 $0 14 Relocate Street Light $7,500.00 / EA 0 $0 15 Relocate Traffic Signal System $300,000.00 I EA 0 $0 16 Relocate Freeway Sign (2 post) $1,000.00 I EA 0 $0 17 Relocate Sign (1 Post) $300.00 / EA 0 $0 18 Reconstruct Overhead Sin $50,000.00 / EA 0 $0 19 Relocate Call Box $2,000.00 / EA 0 $0 20. Relocate Power Pole $15,000.00 / EA 0 $0 21 Relocate Catch Basin $8,000.00 1 EA 0 $0 22 Relocate Fire Hydrant $2,500.00 / EA 0 $0 23 Relocate Bus Bench - $600.00 / EA -0-$0 24 Relocate Monument Wall $5,000.00 / EA -0-$0 25 Relocate Utility Boxes $500.00 / EA 0 $0 26 Relocate Main Water Valve $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 27 Relocate UtilityVault $3,000.00 / EA 0 $0 28 Adjust Manhole to Grade $1,500.00 / EA 0 $0 29 Adjust Water Meter $500.00 / EA 0 $0 30 Adjust Water Valve$500.00 / EA 0 $0 31 Adjust Minor Above Ground Utilities - $500.00 / EA 0 $0 32 Driveway $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 33 Ea Earthwork Earth $12.00 / CY 3,600 $43,000 34 Construct PCC Pavement $15.00 / SF 0 $0 35 Construct AC Pavement $14.00 / SF 33,400 $468,000 36 Construct AC Overfay $3.00 / SF 0 $0 37 Construct Slurry Seal $0.25 / SF 0 $0 38 Construct Striping & Marking $4.00 / LF 750 $3,0$0 39 Construct AC Dike $7.00 / LF 0 $0 40 Construct Curb &Gutter $30.00 / LF 1,400 $42;000 41 Construct Concrete Banier $50.00 I LF 0 $0 42 Construct Median Curb $20.00 / LF 60 $1,000 43 Construct Median Concrete $10.00 / SF 100 $1,000 44 ConsWct Median/Parkway Landsra ing $10.00 / SF 100 $1,000 45 Construct PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 14,300 $100,000 46 Construct Access Ramp $5,000.00 / EA 4 $20,000 47 Construct Retaining Wall $50.00 / SF 0 $0 48 Construct Storm Dmin Main $100.00 / LF 0 $0 49 Construct RCB $1,000.00 / LF 0 $0 50 Construct Headwall $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 51 Construct Concrete V -Ditch $15.00 / LF 0 $0 52 Construct Bridge Widening $500.00 / SF 0 $0 53 Construct Parkway Landscaping/lrri ation $10.00 / SF 0 $0 54 Construct Wall $70.00 / LF 0 $0 55 Building/Structure Demolition (1 Story) $10.00 / SF 0 $0 56 Traffic Control 8% 1 $55,000 57 Drainage Items 10% 1 $74,000 58 SWPPP Plan and Implementation 6°/ 1 $49,000 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $963.000 Ri ht -of -Way 100 1 SF 47,700 $4,770,000 Ri ht-of-Wa Mana emenl 5 / % $239,000 RIGHT-OF-WAY SUBTOTAL $5 009 000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & RIGHT-OF-WAY COST $5,972,000 Preliminary Project Development (10% of total Construction/RW cost) $598,000 Design Engineering/Administration Costs (15% of total Construction/RW cost) $896,000 Construction Engineering Costs/Administration (10% of total Constructlon/RW cost) $598,000 Contin enc (20% of Total Construction/RW cost $1,195,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $9,259,000 dAmstestimatesy bluff-17th.xis NEWPORT BEACH FAIRSHARE FEE PROGRAM UPDATE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES Location: Location K Bluff Road Extension Date: 08/07/2007 Mitigation: Construct Bluff Road as a Primary from 17th St to Coast Hwy Estimated by: P. Chao u, $ 00.00;LF is based on 1u4 R or road width from RW to RW, average depth of 10 it for cut and 011 and $2.50/CY d:Wostestirmles* bluff exlension.xls DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE QUANTITY COST 1 Mobilization 10.00% $952,000 2 Clear &Grub $10,000.00 -/ AC 15.20 $152,000 3 Remove Striping - $10.00 / LF 0 $0 4 Remove Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 0 $0 5 Remove Median Curb $30.00 / LF 0 $0 6 Remove PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 0 $0 7 Remove Pavement $4.00 / SF 0 $0 8 Remove Wall $10.00 / LF 0 $0 9 Remove Channel $15.00 / LF 0 $0 10 Remove/Replace Chain Link Fence $50.00 / LF 0 $0 11 Reconstruct Metal Beam Guard Rail $70.00 / LF 0 $0 12 Remove & Relocate Tree - $3,000.00 / EA 0 $0 13 Sawcut $1.00 / LF 0 $0 14 Relocate Street Light $7,500.00 / EA 0 $0 15 Relocate Traffic Signal System $300,000.00 / EA 0 $0 16 Relocate Freeway Sin 2 post $1,000.00 / FA 0 $0 17 Relocate Sin 1 Post $300.00 / EA 0 $0 18 Reconstruct Overhead Sin $50,000.00 / EA 0 $0 19 Relocate Call Box $2,000.00 / FA 0 $0 20 Relocate Power Pole $15,000.00 / EA 0 $0 21 Relocate Catch Basin $8,000.00 / EA 0 $0 22 Relocate Fire Hydrant $2,500.00 / FA 0 - $0 23 Relocate Bus Bench $600.00 / EA 0 $0 24 Re locate Monument Wall $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 25 Relocate Utility Boxes $500.00 / EA 0 $0 26 Relocate Main Water Valve $5,000.00 1 EA 0 $0 27 Relocate Utility Vault $3,000.00 / FA 0 $0 28 Adjust Manhole to Grade $1,500.00 / EA 0 $0 29 Adjust Water Meter $500.00 / EA 0 $0 30 Adjust Water Valve $500.00 / EA 0 $0 31 Ad'ust Minor Above Ground Utilities $500.00 / EA 0 $0 32 1vl Driveway $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 33 Earthwork ' $100.00 / LF 4,600 $460,000 34 Construct PCC Pavement $15.00 / SF 0 $0 35 Construct AC Pavement $14.00 ! SF 312,800 $4,379,000 36 Construct AC Oveda $3.00 / SF 0 $0 37 Construct Slurry Seal $0.25 / SF 0 $0 38 Construct Striping & Markin $4.00 / LF 4,600 $18,000 39 Construct AC Dike $7.00 / LF 0 $0 40 Construct Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 9,200 $276,000 41 Construct Concrete Barrier $50.00 ! LF 0 $0 42 Construct Median Curb $20.00 / LF 9,200 $184,000 43 Construct Median Concrete $10.00 / SF 970 $10,000 44 Construct Median/Parkwa Landsca in $10.00 / SF 68,350 $683.000 45 Construct PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 92,000 $644,000 46 Construct Access Ram $5,000.00 ! EA 0 $6 47 Construct Retaining Wall $50.00 / SF 0 $0 48 Construct Storm Drain Main $100.00 / LF 0 $0 49 Construct RCB $1,000.00 / LF 0 $0 50 Construct Headwall $5,000.00 1 EA 0 $0 51 Construct Concrete V -Ditch $15.00 / LF 0 $0 52 Construct Bride Widening $500.00 / SF 0 $0 53 Construct Parkway Landsca in /Irri ation $10.00 ! SF 0 $0 54 Construct Wall $70.00 / LF 0 $0 55 Building/Structure Demolition (1 Story) $10.00 / SF 0 $0 56 Traffic Control 80% 1 $544,000 57 Drainage Items 10% 1 $735,000 58 SWPPP Plan and Im lementation 6% 1 $485,000 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL-- $9 522 000 Ri ht-of-Wa468,200 ly $46,820,000 Ri h Mana $2,341,000 T -OF- RIGHT-OF-WAY SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL $49,161,000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & RIGHT-OF-WAY COST $58,683,000 Preliminary Project Development (10% of total Construction/RW cost) $5,869,000 Design Engineering/Administration Costs (15% of total Construction/RW cost) $8,803,000 Construction Engineering Costs/Administration (10% of total Construction/RW cost) $5,869,000 Contin enc 20% of Total Construction/RW cost $11,737,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $90,961,000 u, $ 00.00;LF is based on 1u4 R or road width from RW to RW, average depth of 10 it for cut and 011 and $2.50/CY d:Wostestirmles* bluff exlension.xls NEWPORT BEACH FAIRSHARE FEE PROGRAM UPDATE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES Location: Newport Blvd & Coast Hwy Date:.1/17/2006 Mitigation: Add 3rd EB T lane, Add 4th WB T lane, Modify Old Newport Blvd connection Estimated by: T. Keith htpdata101056891admin\ o testimate'Ac es_Newpod-CoasUds DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE QUANTITY COST I Mobilization 10.00% 1 $797,000 2 Clear &Grub $10,000.00 / AC 1.2 $12,000 3 Remove Striping $10.00 / LF 3,840 $38,000 4 Remove Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 7,460 $224,000 5 Remove Median Curb $30.00 / LF 975 $29,000 6 Remove PCC Sidewalk $7.00 1 SF 62,700 $439,000 7 Remove Pavement $4.00 / SF 108,540 $434,000 8 Remove Wall $10.00 / LF 565 $6,000 9 Remove Channel $15.00 / LF 0 $0 10 Remove/Replace Chain Link Fence $50.00 / LF 0 $0 11 Reconstruct Metal Beam Guard Rail $70.00 / LF 0 $0 12 Remove 8 -Relocate Tree $3,000.00 / EA 46 $138,000 13 Sawcut $1.00 / LF 6,060 $6,000 14 Relocate Street Light $7,500.00 / EA 20 $150,000 15 Relocate Traffic Signal System $300,000.00 / EA 1.5 $450,000 16 Relocate Freeway Sign (2 post $1,000.00 ! EA 4 $4,000 17 Relocate Sign (1 $300.00 / EA 51 $15,000 16 Remove Overheadd Si Si Sign $5,000.00 / EA 2 $10,000 19 Relocate Call Box $2,000.00 ! EA 0 $0 20 Relocate Power Pole $25,000.00 / EA 0 $0 21 Relocate Catch Basin $8,000.00 / EA 23 $184,000 22 Relocate Fire Hydrant $2,500.00 / EA - 6 $15,000 23 Relocate Bus Bench $600.00 / EA 1 $1,000 24 Relocate Monument Wall $5,000:00 -/ EA 2 $10,000 25 Relocate Utility Boxes $500.00 / EA 0 $0 26 Relocate Main Water Valve $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 27 Relocate Vault $3,000.00 / EA 0 $0 28 Adjust Manhole to Grade $1,500.00 / EA 0 $0 29 Ad'ust Water Meter $500.00 / EA 0 $0 30 Adjust Water Valve $500.00 / EA 0 $0 31 Adjust Minor Above Ground Utilities $500.00 / EA 0 $0 32 ModifyDrivewa $5,000.00 1 EA 10 $50,000 33 Earthwork $12.00 / CY 16,320 $196,000 34 Construct PCC Pavement $15.00 / SF 0 $0 35 Construct AC Pavement $14.00 / SF 129,700 $1,816,000 36 Construct AC Overlay $3.00 / SF 0 $0 37 Construct Slurry Seal $0.25 / SF 234,800 $59,000 38 Construct Striping & Marking $4.00 / LF 5,830 $23,000 39 ConsWct AC Dike $7.00 / LF 0 $0 40 Construct Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 9,135 $274,000 41 Construct Concrete Barrier $50.00 / LF 0 $0 42 Construct Median Curb $20.00 / LF 765 $15,000 43 Construct Median Concrete $10.00 / SF 4,885 $49,000 44 Construct MedianlParkway Landscaping $10.00 I SF 0 $0 45 Construct PCC Sidewalk- $7.00 / SF 44,325 $310,000 46 Construct Access Ram2 $5,000.00 / EA 19 $95,000 47 Construct Retaining Wall $50.00 / SF 9,950 $498,000 48 Construct Storm Drain Main $100.00 1 LF 0 $0 49ConsWct RCB $1,000.00 / LF 0 $0 50 Construct Headwall $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 51 Construct Concrete V -Ditch $15.00 / LF 0 $0 52 Construct Bridge Widening $500.00 / SF 0 $0 53 Construct Parkway Landscaping/Irrigation $10.00 / SF 43,690 $437,000 54 Construct Wall $70.00 / LF 0 $0 55 Building/Structure Demolition 1 Story) $10.00 / SF 0 $0 56 Traffic Control 8% 1 $479,000 57 Drainage Items 5% 1 $299,000 58 SWPPP Plan and implementation 6% 1 $406,000 59 Ubli Allowance 5% 1 $299,000 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $8 267 000 Ri ht-of-Wa - $100.00 / SF 5,250 $525,000 Ri h a Mana 5 / I. $26,000 RIGHTT-OF-OF-WAY SUBTOTAL $551,000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & RIGHT-OF-WAY COST $8,818,000 Preliminary Project Development (10% of total Construction/RW cost) $882,000 Design Engineering/Administration Costs (15% of total Construction/RW cost) $1,323,000 Construction Engineering Costs/Administration (10% of total Construction/RW cost) $882,000 Contingency 20% of Total Construction/RW cost $1,764,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $13,669,000 htpdata101056891admin\ o testimate'Ac es_Newpod-CoasUds NEWPORT BEACH FAIRSHARE FEE PROGRAM UPDATE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES Location: Location M Pedestrian Overcrossings - Coast Hwy Date: 08/07/2007 Mitigation: Construct 6 Pedestrian Overcrossings Estimated by: C. Davis dlwsteslimatestrn pedestrian overcrassings - wastxls DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE QUANTITY COST 1 Mobilization 10.00% $5,037,000 2 Clear & Grub $10,000.00 / AC o.00 $0 3 Remove Striping $10.00 / LF 0 $0 4 Remove Curb &Gutter $30.00 / LF 0 $0 5 Remove Median Curb $30.00 / LF -0 -so 6 Remove PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF - 0 $0 7 Remove Pavement $4.00 / SF 0 $0 8 Remove Wall $10.00 / LF 0 $0 9 Remove Channel $15.00 / LF 0 $0 10 Remove/Replace Chain Link Fence $50.00 / LF 0 $0 11 Reconstruct Metal Beam Guard Rail $70.00 / LF 0 $0 12 Remove & Relocate Tree $3,000.00 / EA 0 $0 13 Sawcut $1.00 / LF -0 -so 14 Relocate Street Light $7,500.00 / EA 0 -so 15 Relocate Traffic Signal System $300,000.00 / EA 0 $0 16 Relocate Freeway Sign (2 post) $1,000.00 / EA 0 $0 17 Relocate Sign (1 Post)$300.00 / EA 0 $0 18 Reconstnict Overhead Sign $50,000.00 / EA 0 $0 19 Relocate Call Box $2,000.00 / EA 0 $0 20 Relocate Power Pole (Wood) $25,000.00 / EA 0 $0 21 Relocate Catch Basin $8,000.00 / EA -0 -so 22 Relocate Fire Hydrant $2,500.00 / EA 0 $0 23 Relocate Bus Bench $600.00 / EA 0 $0 24 Relocate Monument Wall $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 25 Relocate Utility Boxes $500.00 / EA 0 $0 26 Relocate Main Water Valve $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 27 Relocate Utility Vault $3,000.00 / EA 0 $0 28 Adjust Manhole to Grade $1,500.00 / EA 0 $0 29 Adjust Water Meter $500.00 / EA 0 $0 30 Adjust Water Valve $500.00 / EA 0 -so 31 Adjust Minor Above Ground Utilities $500.00 1 EA 0 -so 32 Modify Driveway $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 33 Earthwork $12.00 / CY 0 $0 34 Construct PCC Pavement $15.00 1 SF0 $0 35 Construct AC Pavement $14.00 / SF 0 $0 36 Construct AC Overlay $3.00 / SF -0 -so 37 Construct Slurry Seal $0.25 / SF 0 $0 38 Construct Striping & Marking $4.00 / LF 0 - $0 39 Construct AC Dike $7.00 / LF 0 $0 40 Construct Curb & Gutter $30.00 / LF 0 -so 41 Construct Concrete Barrier $50.00 / LF 0 $0 42 Construct Median Curb $20.00 / LF 0 $0 43 Construct Median Concrete $10.00 / SF 0 $0 44 Construct Median/Parkway Landscaping $10.00 / SF 0 $0 45 Construct PCC Sidewalk $7.00 / SF 0 .$0 46 Construct Amass Ramp $5,000.00 / EA 0 $0 47 Construct Retaining Wall $50.00 / SF 0 $0 48 Construct Storm Drain Main $100.00 / LF 0 $0 49 Construct RCB $1,000.00 / LF 0 -so 50 Construct Headwall $5,000.00 / EA -0 -so 51 Construct Concrete V -Ditch $15.00 1 LF 0 $0 52 Construct Bridge Widening $500.00 / SF 0 $0 53 Construct Parkway Landscaping/Irrigation $10.00 / SF 0 -so 54 Construct Wall $70.00-T LF 0 $0 55 Pedestrian Overcrossing $6,000,000.00 / EA 6 $36,000,000 56 Traffic Control 8% 1 $2,880,000 57 Drainage Items1 $3,888,000 58 SWPPP Plan and Implementation 610%% 1 $2,566,000 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $50 371 000 Ri htrof-Way 100 / SF $0 212hkof-Way Management 5 / % $5 - RIGHT -OF -WAY SUBTOTAL $0 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & RIGHT-OF-WAY COST Preliminary Project Development (10% of total Construction/RW cost) Design Engineering/Administration Costs (15% of total Construction/RW cost) Construction Engineering Costs/Administration (10% of total Construction/RW cost) Contingency 20% of Total Construction/RW cost $50,371,000 $5,038,000 $7,556,000 $5,038,000 $10,075,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $78,078,000 dlwsteslimatestrn pedestrian overcrassings - wastxls C. M J e . ' �' ,� ter, • i �T BLVD. LLULQ- MITIGATIM ADD 08 LETT TURN (2L) EXISTING L Z ADD EB U" PAN ADO SB TN LAK (]T) �'{• l t NEN IAPBovEVFNT PDD P8 T W LAK (3T) ' '' f f •) SM ST. SCALE', I' = 50' \• ' ". rrvls �� ttslGm .x mAa ,x CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH oEr•m oerz 50 100 150 wre er tcSG+lAnd re rEvnms A e'0 xx xx/xxpx PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT A!- 1 ul top W co I 1 -0 0 --- — -.%, ----T I UU IN . R * • . .� • ' ���/! 10 ' MI` 4r IC '. r" rte''•riv Lu .. �1�� • 1 ") / � Tri- .�� ���. T+ �d+tYT" 2 U oil AI or r WI RIVERSIDE AV. � ' � ' ', ,' ' _ �A` � � . � • � •• ' ! �+.� � 1 "r � M1 � I �T � d COAST HAT. RIVE JOE Av. A COAST .PA HAY- (Y) YITIDATIM y ADD ES FT AW ER LEEFTRW! (z1) ELIMINATE AB RIWiT ilAdEU. I '• '� 1 I �\I I tl ��,I FF Tj - Cc LL d1% Ift U. rrr Ip MIN - YA TNSTIN AV. .y��A A1�,`f�{'�■—{ 1 _ . G .yam vl isiv - III LEGEND. fi '' o— Tusi1N Av. A coAST IArr. RIVERSIDE AVENUE & (R) YITIGATItlE .A )COAST HAY. '- IXISTINO lNE 1EV1[YED b , 1 AW FB 1lNWKN It. IEA IYPROYEAENT `0YTB1ISflppY/ O ELIMINATE L.VE �,A,N„� COAST HIGHWAY (7)g usT Nac R.C.E.. m41=°:j:� TUSTIN AVENUE& I” f ' T Na. IGMo SCALE: I' - SO' EA . _ _ , DAM /../.• COAST HIGHWAY 8 0 `4qP��' YYG� 0E51°FD AxLN xx CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 0 5o IW t5o mm R/ DESCRIPI w FEVISIOG W'D OtcYm xx nlrt xx/xx/xx PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ➢EEL s�( % Y �r 7 I I NACANR A BLVD. W Iraw IX15TIlA!£ �1�ddd� CAMS DR. IL 1ENG A IMMYE FREE Rltlrt W Q ELIMINATE LAN ��r L ud • � 40 R!C3� AAK / J \ Alf r *1, 5w AA ado A. Of ti 40 If � ,10 40I a $ ���.'�i�lf��\�� '!� � - :�� -` \ � •_ /� ' •'a�'IIS / ,A� � ,s 6 YITIGATIW NYIM ADD M +� WMIWE SB H� 0 7777— ,llrtstgr/ MACARTHUR BOULEVARD & @�@ IDD M"O"AIGNT"N .�\FRIT n'rc 4, MIPCIFAL CIVIL M.IPM r•A RAW IC nOIA/C In+ 0 SCALE I• = 50' 0 50 100 1 JAVBOWE RD. JAWriIFE_ Rp 4 fpaPLK pp (1]1 YITIGAT IDN ADD NR RIGHT TUW ADD SB T U LAAE ELIMINATE ED FREE RIGHT TURN pY. a MUM W i,-lINVas -rot Ir on JAMBOIEE R0. JdEI�E RD 4 REMH ST {161 YIT[GAT10.V ACO SB T LAW ELIMINATE M FREE RIGER R04 ST. LEGEND - EXISTING LAZE 6EA' IWRO DAM FREE RIGNF THE Q ELIMINATE LANE XICAI: I' a 50' EfWIKIM1? ELVISIM a ITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Mm rc x x CAVFUS DR. CAW I)RIVr 4 BRISTM SHEET NORTH (15) MITIGATION ,M! iRST WYE r aRU� LANE � _ USI wY[ G R.6.E xa. xX lx Ey. XI-x4X1 : BRISTOL ST. ULQhv `= EXISTING LANE h II.PRDYDYETYT FREE RIGHT TURN LI ELIMINATE LANE i lim MWIMIOY 6 FLVISIDG 8 8 xx CAMPUS DRIVE & BRISTOL STREET NORTH (15) " xK CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH o fxx/xX/xx PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT `AEE1 aFX z FEYICRO ,M! iRST WYE r NRIIDIPA _ USI wY[ G R.6.E xa. xX lx Ey. XI-x4X1 : YFTE !p fIYR O� IESI@FD x% xx 8 8 xx CAMPUS DRIVE & BRISTOL STREET NORTH (15) " xK CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH o fxx/xX/xx PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT `AEE1 aFX z N c m x x N N om m w aw o w Y _,o W JN W am u NOTES: LEGEND: 1. AIFRAFF IC STRIPES AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS O PAVEMENT DELINEATION DETAIL NUMBER .L IN THE CALTRANS RIGHT OF WAY ARE THERMOPLASTIC j UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PM PAVEMENT MARKING OR LEGEND AS SHOWN 2. PLACE ARROWS 20'BEFORE LIMIT LINE OR CROSSWALK. PAINT TWO (2)COAT$ UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE I S. ALL CROSSWALKS SHALL HAVE A 10 FOOT INSIDE WIDIH, li) THERMOPLASTIC 4. REMOVE ALL CONFLICTING PAVEMENT DELINEATION, pp REMOVE PAVEMENT MARKING OR LEGEND AS SHOWN CW 1'WHITE CROSSWALK LINES I ' I LL 1'WHITE LIMIT LINE rE� EXISTING TO REMAIN Cot!' Ng 1 _.1y. " vu l� L J OF PAVEMENT DELINEATION DETAIL LJ -«+- CHANGE i n.n PROPOSED WIDTH r- -t I \10•:vg ANGLE POINT TYPE G OR F DELINEATOR (CLASS I FLEXIBLE POST) (PER PLANS) I THIS PLAN ACCURATE FOR PAVEMENT DELINEATION ONLY. IISt COVNIr RW IE rO TSL PNOJ [I ND.SNLEI 12 Ora 73 24.8 XXX REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN PAVEMENT DELINEATION `(.Al F: 1 —40' I I _ % CALTRANS R/Y! 3: F— O w 0 O m `f` Z I > o LU F - TAT > rn I I .— w Q r On Q O I Cr N :In 0 OrCo GO m _ O ZCALTRANS z!. R/W COO>- L J ; PAI TYPE IV(L) TYP aw O Alf o LEJ u— V awi i (T) T TYPE VIfILI uo u 38 (3 5�) I; RP PM TYP T) RP r\� - -38 (170r)— — a 27B 25 + _—_— Q s� — > 40 La vt ? w 72' (T) 2 12' 0 w g 12' 19: 191 i =IW/t o v (T) LL x`-'---12'- 2 o On 12N CO 12 1A V, 4 / a 37B (20 ')', P61 TYPE IV(L) J 2' 797+02 z (T)� (T) TYP AIA CH xi5t / a , 278 'J -2r' :96+93 .� v v '. (T) 388 MATCH w. C` N. PW TYPE IV(R) "J" 191+31 z j (T)`. TYP Beg Trans ? OPM TYPE IV(R) � m : TYP o W r u y o Q z R. m E O N I M oI- ILI o W � N NB SR -7-3--0N RAMP DIST COUNTY ROUTE TOTAL PROJECT NO. SHEETS 12 Ora 73 24.8 XXX o Q REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER MARK J. P €SPOSITO I PLANS APPROVAL DATE xa 9/10/08 OA CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ° , CIVIL 3300 NEWPORTBOULEVARD 4JE a Ceil�"' NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 R8F CONSULTING 14725 ALTON PARKWAY IRVINE, CA 92618 TM Stare ,r ceff Na v Its art", wogenls sM///bt De regonslD;e rar tM .",V, mmdelerrss a n'tttrar/c CP As a MY, pfa,, a t. ;i r / / LE J "J" 193+01 "J" 197+11 Beg Trans MATCH Exist END Trans + L J \^ _ _ (tz') — -_ —� --_ 12'1 (74r) / / 499 - 8 / -- J LIN (10')�98.- _ ,__...- - ,�. JAMBOREE ROAD / IT I') .1 11 _ ------ ----------- — _.__--__ E 795+01 •^�, \//::'' u/ '/ '/.',// LJ MA CH 01 END Trans f l LEJ ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN o0 FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN PAVEMENT DELINEATION SCALE: 1'=40' no PD -2 THIS PLAN ACCURATE FOR PAVEMENT DELINEATION ONLY. �o O i 2 �3 USERNAVE _> sUSEP CU OOOOO EA OA9700 RELATIVENINCHES AL CF 1 1 I � DG FILE=>SREOUEST 11 ' A j61- `. ` \ 1 (�/ MATCH LINE -SEE BELOW LEFT it ;. s �,� I NwOL14 j f le ASK 4 i i • x 1 � a ti � F L C i 1 , uACART1uR liw. MITIGATION "ISTING LANE EAI)DLI 5a LEN TFRE (x) t '1 AA ADD (NATE NO FREE RIGHT 1DRN NEN (NIGHT TENT FCfC RD./DJNITA RDD M19 RIGHT iWN " CANYON M. FREE NIGHT TURN ELIMINATE LME SCALE. 1" - 50' 0 SO IL 150 DATE 9r EESAIPTI(N w "Is105 on "`w MACARTHUR BOULEVARD & s o axor[xTAp, RAAe FORD ROAD I BONITA CANYON g ,: rnsT �,�DLITU usr ruse CIVIL D� IN11i ��� R.uE. NO, ,,.... DRIVE (49) t3 g0. �.-vl-u A OAIE xvl+x/xv o s/s F L G+' 4 fllii 0 S1QF0 xx `"A0i xx pQr¢p DATE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH g" xx xx/xx/xx PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 514T of �( Y r �' II c— KU ~� ? \ \ or \: w J R � •,.3LA I goo M T.. I MACART R BLVD. q '- rl,acnr; TIJUR IW-m r � �R rI-vr I , LEGEML c— MITIGATION `S EXISTING LATE RiRI ISf/p {fv1EED 4`Y�d w ADD SS LEFT Mal (3U �o A/i MACARTHUR IL SAyA}1 SAN JOACUIN ADD ES LEFT TUFN (3L) t N£R IMPROVEMENT ,s �NSTNRf� t SAN JOAQUIN HILLS ROAD (50) ry.14�¢f x AD ED NIGHT MIN TE RIGHT TLRN " Ne ma .,, IRIICIPK CNIL DMINFA ,. HILLS M. FREE RIGHT TURN R.C.E. M....... b ADDNETELIMINATE •S RIE RIGHT lUN � ELIMINATE LANE SCALE 1• � SD' \. [q .i-..-.. � CAM xx/.x/xx b y IDD AS DOLSLE RI TURN !�/ nvn ig ttslem xx xx CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH G D so IDD ISD DATE e= ¢ 1pylw a M[SI0Ib MP'D DEzwm %x nME xx/xx/xz PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTIAEN7 VETT rc X I ' J II rtl.11l�ll �Illu, ." J —O J w r� ALF w )MAW w to U Q E � MITIGATIM AUG w THRU ELIMINATE HD RIGHT TURN ADD GH THRU ADD ED THRU LEFT IRVIK AV. / D LEGEND. MITIGATIQ 88�I,. AGMHD M r UIS4 LAW IWROVEIETIT MESA DR, THU WW 9 LEFT TURN Q ELIMINATE LAW -o ELIMINATE AG RIC+R Tkm SCALE 1' - 50' 0 SO 100 �F Wit BAYSIDE DR. COAST IfV. LEGEND MITIGATION EXISTING LAW AM 4M W THRIXIGH WN IMPROWWW 0 10- Ag �. ►�' 177 j�VA tt 77 / i v i►•aa �7�i�" �, / 1 � Iib � T 44 vA _ 1 ®/'x,61 .` ' \.r \.�1r1� \` \: \ \\ � Sr ��'1� 't Aha I* ./ / �• �.nl�l• 01TIOATIOR MICEN PLACENTIA AVE B AELM HOSPITAL ANO SUPERIOR AVE TO A SECONDARY CROSS-SECTION 50A%: 1' - 50' 0 50 100 150 DAR BI LE: cr• y�.+��•++-ter,. ` h .'E�^.� X11 I _ v r kLi e�' 7F`L r .'-If JY.. ,+I• Y-ir�• i f.t�•r? 3' s iiL / _ I4 �� � �.a_� x ii'. h R'A TYI � y. { - i. .i •� � Y 1 i \p ! . � \ i )N r fr ••�, t ` a ' \, R - a •': �G�y�c4 a �P �:. 15M ST. LEGE MITIGATION ADD SO RIGHT TI.RN f AEA IWROVEMTTYT IDD S0 LEFT Tu w1lu"AM E6 THW p ADD EB E 71N1 OT\Ir[Sf ppA' V OJ 44 ADD ns THW RIGHT ` wsr xlv ). COAST HAY. ADO AR RIGHT TURN 'y NSTHx;TE ^I TRIIGIYE ClYD-MR 15TH STREET EXTENSION y - i3 SCALE: 1' 50' ��� [m. Cn1E a/u/vv u rq�A hvn \\� OESIDm xx ° ""I xx CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH "g uiI o so IDD Iso arc er rETrnlAnw OF Acvlsloa Aw'o nm� xx aAa xx/xx/xx PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Y r S 1 � � .:_: x- -_ { . _ ,. � �� �� Igl ,. � �. +• Iii I I ;x ¢•� 1,���t � I4 1+ Her .+l�' d.. ,'�{ y� . / � /�- t , , IL X. q a �a AJ3Y�. sE '� .h __- _ A l $ 71ly. IL I ?�s Irk ' � I — I 1 11: IXy _ .1 .1 1 �.9., ... 3t..Al q� i x,.11i 43 �r" ] oil �, d n-77 w Aga i �• / / $ 41 AL VITICATI", NOEN I5n, STREET MGM r AcerrnA I aF6rrgN/ ffvl[,ED 15TH STREET • PLACENTIA AVE TO MWD'/IA AVE TO A 4 -LANE c E NA /�s m AVENUE TO MONROVIA SEWri[)ARY <NOSS-5ECTIuv `,\O •^ USi NAVE �- mocha civ, 0r,,m E. No.xn.x n.v 10. . AVENUE � �P. �•-AAn. al CAM SCALE: 7' 50' EESIOED xx °A'"' xx I CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH a 0 5o too 150 CAM •r Ecmlrnm OF misma ur'o ESL`vN '® xx xx/xx/xx PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 9m rr X s RF '1'F S SyFFTr� 07 15TH ST. t vvraf all COAST MY.f LEt€lfL t NEN IWROYfJlEM MITIOATtON ADD M RIGHT 1lTW ACO SB LEFT TURN ADD ER Tmu ACO ES LEFT TUM ACO AB "IJ RIWT ADD AS RIW1F 1WN SCALE' I' - 50' 0 50 too 150 f4iCRIP1141 EE AEVISIB6 ti 1 / 1 I I I / `o� etlstYAyl ., _ V.SI NAVE Na OXKK a E•p a-wo- � a GATE \ A✓' � C Y \ �� ICSI �a. Ertd�- txc xx 40 15TH STREET EXTENSION CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC OF= CEPARTmet;r T 2 , �I _ _ 1.;lli �l U) -I - rn n — ITT= cn r _ ITT m ----- -- rn — — -- --- — -- — oW 15TH ST, J� YY COAST HAY. I: FCEW NEW IK�OVEVENT ,� 00001 1 C`C99 1 i 1;. .. lid t s Ji up 2 1 • g '�� ._ 1. 1 `4 � t11 � 171.: x -S. A � ui _ �� mfr ��II '�.. ^{�A7 A� 1.; + � f�• 1 a I r''� I �' ;► k ? 1N 7'1 A 1 ^ 1 1 3 , �ill�t�< �'' ,/,., aiYfiA. � 1 •1 C"=' ,� �31r '�,. ,. .. 'r, MITIGATION ALO SO RIGHT TLRN ADD SB LEFT TURN PEVIEASD ADD E8 TIRUa ACO E8 LEFT U,RN Op4C1(S!/pA+` ACO Ne THRLI RIGHT r 57 NAVE IFuriPk CIVIL DdiDEER 15TH STREET EXTENSION o ADD WO RIGHT TLRN 1- LAST NAVE F.C.E. IA. u.w 1". Ne KcxX% o SCALE: I"= SD'a-xa-.v s DATE xv/xx/xv a s„ rlon =777M pPM xx CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 000 5o loo 150 DATE Of EEMH?TIUI OF FEVISIDA W'D 5�— MNE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT vEEr DE xz xx/xz/xx 3 3 o AM Ll h gag � Imog . r= _ _`,: j► c 1s �- illl�i�� 0 t s Q w w w 2 J x U H Q a. � MITIGATION WWON IEOIAN ON M MTM KMOM SAN MIGLEL TO COAST HAYV TO p 6i.AfE Mp.pM SCALE: 1"- 50' 4f 4 r I ' - F - LL W _ J -�MISM.a 0 �- w w w - J 2 U Q 4' �Y i IS 1 � Y;7- 17TH 5T. FAtFF ICI. a.. LEGEND N£R H.PROYEIkNT MITIGATIM PDD NEI RIGHT TDRN ADD W I T ADD NB THRLJ ODD GD LEFT PDRIGHT ED 7ERU Rltl1i TM� s LLU Ll= 7 l:L SCPIE 1" = 50' 0 50 100 150 O BLUFF ROAD FROM g ®a`alEss/A�w nesT NAVE �� IASr NAVE 17 TH STREET TO COAST EnuA1fAL CIVIL DAREE>t w y — -z/n wx �LU x xN ��l tv [I1\ftiv�! " ttsl°m xx °""' xx CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT V£[T 1 if ¢sa<Ifnala vEvlsms AFf'o Vol ,r off n 5 BLUFF ROAD FROM g ®a`alEss/A�w nesT NAVE �� IASr NAVE 17 TH STREET TO COAST EnuA1fAL CIVIL DAREE>t y fl.G.E, tA. uun HIGHWAY okm xx/xx/xx ��l tv [I1\ftiv�! " ttsl°m xx °""' xx CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT V£[T 1 if ¢sa<Ifnala vEvlsms AFf'o n¢laD pAIE xx xx/xx/xx n.. Mop"", UU11:1- I D i= 6 i R .,•gid' d4� �,? c 'U • �yt`J Q �xoo g�Py lTP�G S� s��ti4 SCALE: 1' a 50' 0 SO 100 150 lEGEK: MITIGATION. ADD AB RIGHT TLEN EXISTING LAZE A00 2 ® LF TURN A00 2 GB LER TLRN 'IL NEW IMPROVEMENT AM 2 58 RIGHT TURN NO RIGHT TURN OVQ PHASE IVPROVEI.ENT Q �xoo g�Py lTP�G S� s��ti4 SCALE: 1' a 50' 0 SO 100 150 NEtlPORf BLVD. hdh5 ,MITIS( WQRT�VO OTIO[NITIGISjOjrTl10R PDO NB LEFT R auto SB CONN. SB M1EIY Y T IID. S.'A OLD tEAPORT BLVD. o- COAST HAY. k 50 fEYRDRT o- �• BLVD. MITIGATION —� ra ODD AD TOy PDD EB TFRWO"DGII � M tEAP.ORT BLVD. Ilk 4 B MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET 22 4 I 'RimAcc • 1 lY � 0 CDA51 RM! k M NEAPORT BLVD MITIGATION ALO 2 FB TIRWGI/ ELIMINATE M RIGHT Tl&P1 PA0 PORTION OF OLD NEAPORT B`,v N'rr OLD %B TO M RAID COM. ADD EM TKIDUNI MODIFY 1.8 FREE RIGHT TO STOP COMROLLED I LEC. EXISTING LME •� FEM IMPROVEI.ENT Q MIMINAM LME SCALE I` = 50' 0 50 ,00 150 Aw " M J w w w w rn W a 0 1z ILL! LU x Lu w Tn w Z J 2 U F - Q HOSPITAL RD. 1 .M 14 i ` 1 r ij fix -to IAW41-44�i J��•i� r _bA 7k �- Q.w. N IMRT R -w, • VJTu G811E MITIGATIOR AM IIE PCH TD IEIIPoRT RLVO CONN. RT Rill AT HOSPITAL ROAO. Al Z h t a .k�®� % G•© IN I' Oft 41pr a 1 am;fi • � .. Y'%HFA' r � �� IF i r Xk- LEC£t✓Q. Ef151'iNG LME It IEA IWROVDw TA"Q ELIMINATE LAZE 9:4L 1'=1 W' IW O ICO 200 NO SrALE 1'•ICO' IESONPTIOI CE PEVISID f£VIErtO ``4 yy01 Of/pl/i pest xAll . PAIN uIT "AVE —_ A 14. .X LI �1_r.-„ 4 OA2_ s� null .. aslem ��rr cAUA"'�! oETaD NEWPORT BLVD. & COAST E" HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS xK CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ;x/xr PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SEET 2 n 3 F RIVERSIDE AVE. � r • ter. - M1 .`'. /•� '" � 4.M,9 �I� � 1 �� ' .. +_ - _- > .. .:" Mr on J T c a C LEua Q R '•'$ "• EXISTING LANE COAST MAY RIVERSIDE HAY. AVE IA ITIGATI 'L NEO IWRO'/El ff ADD M SH WIDER/BIKE ELIMINATE LANE UNE. (' li%1 0 1fX1 200 :DO \ SCALE: 1'=IGD' 14