Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-08-11_GPLCP_Approved_MinutesACTION MINUTES Action Minutes of the General Plan/LCP Implementation Committee held at the City Council Chambers, City of Newport Beach, on Wednesday, August 11, 2010 Members Present: X Ed Selich, Mayor, Chairman 4�EWPO�r � CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH X GENERAL PLAN/LCP IMPLEMENTATION c'IFOR'P COMMITTEE ACTION MINUTES Action Minutes of the General Plan/LCP Implementation Committee held at the City Council Chambers, City of Newport Beach, on Wednesday, August 11, 2010 Members Present: X Ed Selich, Mayor, Chairman X Leslie Daigle, Council Member X Don Webb, Council Member X Barry Eaton, Planning Commissioner X Robert Hawkins, Planning Commissioner X Michael Toerge, Planning Commissioner Advisory Group Members Present: Staff Representatives: E Mark Cross X Larry Frapwell E William Guidero X Ian Harrison X Brion Jeannette X Don Krotee X Todd Schooler Kevin Weeda Dennis Wood Staff Representatives: E David Lepo, Planning Director X Leonie Mulvihill, City Attorney E James Campbell, Principal Planner X Gregg Ramirez, Senior Planner E Melinda Whelan, Assistant Planner X Sharon Wood, Special Projects Consultant X Rich Edmonston, Consultant E = Excused Absence Committee Actions 1. Agenda Item No. 1 —Approval of minutes for April 21, 2010. Action: The minutes were approved as written. Vote: Consensus 2. Agenda Item No. 2 — General Plan/LCP Implementation — Master Task List Action: Receive and file. 3. Agenda Item No. 3 — Fair Share Fee Update Action: The Committee received public comment on the report from the Public Works Department dated July 28, 2010. Bryan Starr of the BIA reviewed a letter dated August 4, 2010, from a coalition of business groups. Peter Herzog of NAIOP, Dan Daniels of Ardell Investment Company, Dennis O'Neil of Hoag Hospital and Scott Meserve of the Koll Company supported the positions in the coalition letter. Steve Ray of the Banning Ranch Conservancy, Chris McElroy and Robin Leffler expressed concerns with Bluff Road through the Banning Ranch property. At the request of Chair Selich, Rich Edmonston explained the history of Bluff Road and the reasons for its inclusion in the fee program. Bluff Road has been on the Newport Beach Master Plan of Streets and Highways since January 13, 1958, when the Master Plan was amended to be consistent with the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways, which already included Bluff Road. Mr. Edmonston noted that lack of consistency of the City's Master Plan with the County's could result in the City not being eligible for regional highway funding, such as Measure M. He explained that the General Plan traffic study and EIR found that Bluff Road was needed under either land use option for the Banning Ranch property; without Bluff Road, West Coast Highway would need to be widened, and that may not be feasible. Mr. Edmonston also explained that cities are required to have transportation funding programs to qualify for regional transportation funding. Newport Beach has had its Fair Share Fee since 1984. The fee has been increased over time, but this is the first comprehensive review of the improvement program and fee, and is based on the updated General Plan adopted in 2006. At the request of Chair Selich, Assistant City Attorney Mulvihill stated that the adoption of a fee does not require environmental review of the individual transportation projects that are intended to be funded with the fee. Planning Commissioner Hawkins noted that the General Plan EIR included the transportation projects in the fee program, because they are in the Circulation Element. E Vote: The Committee took the following straw votes on the issues outlined in the report from the Public Works Department dated July 28, 2010. (References to options correspond with the text of the report.) Banning Ranch Right -of -Way Option A — Unanimous Banning Ranch Right -of -Way Dedication Option A — Hawkins, Selich, Webb Option B — Daigle, Eaton, Toerge Roadway Network Assumptions Option A — Hawkins, Selich, Webb Option B — Daigle, Eaton, Toerge Other Right -of -Way Considerations Option A — Hawkins, Selich, Webb Option B — Daigle, Eaton, Toerge Right -of -Way Overhead Costs Option A — Unanimous Payment of Fees Option A — Unanimous MacArthur Blvd/Jamboree Road Interchange Option A — Webb Option B — Daigle, Eaton, Hawkins, Selich, Toerge Changes in Construction Costs Option B — Daigle, Hawkins Option C — Eaton, Selich, Toerge, Webb Phasing of Fee Changes Option A — Unanimous Sources of Additional Funds Option A — Unanimous Cora Newman stated that Government Solutions' clients support the positions in the coalition letter. Steve Ray stated that the Banning Ranch Conservancy has opinions on the issues discussed by the Committee, but objects to the discussion because consideration of the fee program should comply with CEQA. The Committee directed staff to have Revenue and Cost Specialists re -calculate the fee based on their straw votes. On issues where the vote was a tie, the fee should be calculated per both options. 4. Agenda Item No. 4 — Items for Future Agenda & Future Meeting Dates The next meeting was scheduled for September 22, 2010, to discuss the Airport Area Infrastructure study and fees. Vote: Consensus 5. Agenda Item No. 5 — Public Comments on non -agenda items Planning Commissioner Eaton expressed his dissatisfaction with the outcome of the Planning Commission on the draft Zoning Code, and with staffs stated intent not to provide hard copies of agenda packets; he stated he was considering resigning from the Committee. Planning Commissioner Hawkins also expressed dissatisfaction, and stated he is resigning from the Committee. Council Members Daigle and Selich encouraged Commissioners Eaton and Hawkins to remain on the Committee. 6. Agenda Item No. 6 — Adjourn - Meeting adjourned at 5:15 p.m. rd