Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSS5 - Jr. Lifeguard Building Proposal - PowerPoint071 an :ern r. M7#71 rrs: a AA t _voll 1 l r,7 c ` r TZ. • • • 0 Existing Junior Lifeguards Facility q y h 1 y i l� '�•' iMsrt- rerr r1.. 47%.. - /SEELY NO 3 �1 *�-NCurrentJG Facility Three 12'x60' Modular Trailer Buildings (2,160 SF) Two 20' Shipping Storage Containers Junior Lifeguards currently use adjacent Balboa Pier ';► Public Restroom Facility i (No Water or Sewer Service to Current Facility) Initial Observations for New Facility ➢ A Successful and Positive Program for Kids and the Community ➢ JG Program runs Three Months per Year ➢ Existing Facility does not have attached Restrooms or Showers. Would like connected and dedicated restrooms and showers ➢ Would like additional Admin. Working and Storage Space ➢ Would like to Maintain Current Location ➢ Sighting New Permanent Facility will have Planning & Permitting Challenges ➢ Difficulties and Cost Associated with Connecting to Utilities ➢ Moving and or Expanding Building may have View Impact Initial Draft Concept Thoughts • Same Location on Sand • Approximately 4,100 SF • Estimate Total Cost to be $3,300,000 • JG Foundation Goal would be to Contribute $1,250,000 toward Construction Cost (City would pay for all design, permitting and remaining construction cost $2,050,000) Lifeguard/Foundation Envisions Approximately 4,100 SF Building • Admin Office w/First Aid Room (550 SF) • Meeting Room (1,000 SF) • Kitchenette area (150 SF) • Men's Locker Room (500 SF) • Women's Locker Room (500 SF) • Restroom (100 S F) • Interior Storage (300 SF) • Exterior Storage (800 SF) • Exterior Bathrooms (200 SF) Possible Building Locations F' .f Ab k 4 Site Existing Building FEMA +21' Line (Must be Behind) a� a^ 1 AP fir\ �py S` w w ^ti P �cF4N F7jt NTm �lb � a ry0 Site 1 • Per Recent FEMA Study - Current Location Not Buildable • Can Not Encroach into Park Playing Field without Impacting Popular Field Sports • Review Other Possible Location Possible Building Location Site 1 - End of B Street Parking Lot FEMA Line F e ` ` a \ 9 xZ 9J7 ? Ji2 9, 9J 4/4C/ 91664 9 918 9?0 F� Pros 9, 915 x A? 9794,9 JET ,d�D lAry b� �c c 9j8 a' 2 22 9 9 2q 9/q/ a 9-6 F o' B J�2 a 92T tiro V 929 c' 1001(79/ 6,cr ��D 100, 7003 Approximate 10 1006 location of 4,000 ` - 0? SF building 926 Jf�92g M • Close to Park & Wide Beach • Good View of Workout Area Cons • New View and Traffic Impact to Existing Residents • Added Cost to Extend Utilities from the Alley. Approximately 350 feet. ow ;w cavo Drop-Off/Pick-Up and c !n 10n, Circulation Challenges 0 Location May prove Unfeasible Possible Building Location Site 2 - A Street Parking Lot w Will need to alter the parking lot and take some Park Space/ r n � % m AST 80, FEMA Lirie Approximate location of 4,01 SF building Pros • Close to Historic Location • Close to Park & Wide Beach • Comparable Resident View Impacts • Not on the sand Cons • Loss of -25 parking spots • Added Cost to Extend Utilities and Rework the existing Park/Parking lot • Undetermined potential Impacts to Park Field Sports r , Pros • Close to Historic Location • Close to Park & Wide Beach • Comparable Resident View Impacts • Not on the sand Cons • Loss of -25 parking spots • Added Cost to Extend Utilities and Rework the existing Park/Parking lot • Undetermined potential Impacts to Park Field Sports Possible Building Location Site 3a \ M � Approximate location of 4,000 SF building to - Main Street Parking Lot Pros Closer to Utilities Probably Improved Drop- Off/Pick-Up and Circulation • Less impact to Resident Views Cons Loss of -35 parking spots 2 �-- Further Off Beach 601 � 10 Narrow Beach EMA Line • Possible New View Concerns • Probably need to Reconfigure Parking Lot Possible Building Location Site 3b - \q'. a Approximate' ° location of 41000 SF ++ building a M �30 3 PVC _ m\\ Main Street Parking Lot Pros • Closer to Utilities • Probably Improved Drop- Off/Pick-Up and Circulation • Less Impact to Resident Views Cons • Loss of -35 parking spots • Further Off Beach 80, Narrow Beach • Possible New View Concerns • Probably need to Reconfigure FEMA line Parking Lot Thoughts on Project Costs Current Condition $20,000/year None 15 Years $10,000 Site 1 (B Street) $3,500,000 $150,000/$300,000 50 Years $25,000 Site 2 (A Street) $3,500,000 $60,000/$200,000 50 Years $25,000 Site 3a (Main Street) $3,500,000 $100,00/$100,000 50 Years $25,000 Site 3b (Main Street) $3,500,000 $100,000/$100,000 50 Years $25,000 Status on Design Team Selection Sent RFP to seven design consultants We received four proposals Staff reviewed and scored the proposals I� • Jeff Katz Architecture was mutually selected • Experience working in coastal zone and first responders • Proposal scope includes three phases o Concept, Regulatory Approvals/ Permitting, Develop Construction Documents Next Step • Define Project Scope Tonight • Refine Contract Scope and Cost • Award Design Contract - May 14 or 28, 2019 aE; Questions and Comments • Thoughts on Overall Size, Included Amenities? • Thoughts on Project Cost and Matching Funds? o JGLG Foundation advised they will provide $1.25M in matching funds towards Construction • Thoughts on Preferred Location(s) to Develop Concept Layout? • Any Other Locations that should be Considered? NEWPORTBEACHCA.GOV/PUBLICWORKS