HomeMy WebLinkAbout21 - Mobilitie Telecom PermitSEW PORT C I 11 OF
M- NEWPORT BEACH
City Council Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 21
February 12, 2013
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Community Development Department
Kimberly Brandt, AICP, Director
949 - 644 -3226, kbrandt @newportbeachca.gov
PREPARED BY: Fern Nueno, Associate Planner
APPROVED: VA
v
TITLE: Mobilitie Telecommunications Permit for Faux Eucalyptus Tree
Monopole Located at 2401 Irvine Avenue (PA2010 -073)
ABSTRACT
Mobilitie requests a Telecommunications (Telecom) Permit to install a 62 -foot high false
eucalyptus tree (monopole) Telecom facility on a church property located at 2401 Irvine
Avenue. The proposal includes the installation of antennas and equipment for Verizon
Wireless. The design can accommodate three additional carriers on the monopole for a
total of four carriers. Should the facility be approved, each additional carrier would be
required to obtain a separate Telecom approval pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter
15.70 (Wireless Telecommunication Facilities).
RECOMMENDATION
Conduct Telecom application review;
2. Provide direction to applicant and staff regarding comparative height analysis of
the structure of 57 feet, 56 feet, and /or 50 feet, and the preferable design of the
structure; and
3. Continue the application to March 26, 2013, and direct staff to return with the
appropriate resolution for adoption.
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS
There is no fiscal impact related to this item.
1
Mobilitie Telecommunications Permit (PA2010 -073)
February 12, 2013
Page 2
Project Setting
The proposed Telecom facility is located on the Harbor Christian Church property at the
intersection of Irvine Avenue and Santa Isabel Avenue near Upper Newport Bay, on the
edge of the City boundary adjacent to the City of Costa Mesa. The site is approximately
87,190 square feet in area and is developed with church buildings, a playground,
surface parking, and landscaped areas. The landscaped areas currently include
eucalyptus trees and pine trees that vary in height from approximately 12 feet to 80 feet
high. At its highest point the existing church building is 30 feet high and the attached
cross on the northeast side of the building is 34 feet high. There are four existing
Telecom facilities on site: two on the church building (T- Mobile and AT &T) and two in
the cross (Sprint and Clearwire), which was constructed to house Telecom equipment.
Verizon Wireless is not one of the existing carriers on site.
Mobilitie Telecommunications Permit (PA2010 -073)
February 12, 2013
Page 3
Project Description
Mobilitie is a developer and owner of towers for telecommunications service providers,
such as Verizon Wireless. The application is a request to install a 62 -foot high false
eucalyptus tree (monopole) that includes the installation of 12 Verizon Wireless panel
antennas and one directional antenna. The false tree is a stealth facility as the antennas
are hidden from view by its "branches" and 'leaves." The 230 - square -foot equipment
shelter is proposed to be adjacent to the existing church building and includes a 6 -foot
high decorative block wall to screen the associated equipment.
The design of the monopole can accommodate three additional carriers (four total).
Mobilitie proposes this design to allow a new carrier to collocate on the monopole, as
well as the flexibility for any of the four existing carriers on site to relocate their antennas
from the church building or cross to the monopole. Mobilitie received letters of intent to
collocate on the monopole from three carriers: T- Mobile, AT &T, and Metro PCS. Any
future installations would require review and approval by the Community Development
Director or the City Council depending on the project specifics.
Photographic visual simulations from five vantage points depicting the existing and
proposed conditions (showing the monopole with four carriers) at the site are included
as Attachment D. The plans depicting the proposed project are provided as Attachment
E.
After discussions with City staff regarding the height of the proposed monopole, the
applicant provided Attachment C demonstrating two options for a Telecom facility at a
lower height that would accommodate up to three carriers. Option One allows for three
carriers with the top of the structure at 57 feet high, which is five feet lower than the
proposed monopole. Option Two allows for three carriers with the top height of the
structure at 56 feet high.
Analysis
Consistency with General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan, and Zoning Code
The subject property is designated as Private Institutions (PI) by the Land Use Element
of the General Plan and the Coastal Land Use Plan. The PI designation is intended to
provide for privately owned facilities that serve the public. The Private Institutions land
use designation is implemented by the Private Institutions (PI) Zoning District, which is
intended to provide for areas appropriate for privately owned facilities that serve the
public, including places for assembly /meeting facilities (e.g., religious assembly). The
existing church is consistent with these designations and the proposed project is
accessory to the church use.
The General Plan Natural Resources Element and the Coastal Land Use Plan
designate the nearby portion of Irvine Avenue as a Coastal View Road and establish
3
Mobilitie Telecommunications Permit (PA2010 -073)
February 12, 2013
Page 4
policies for protecting and enhancing the coastal views. The subject property is located
adjacent to the Coastal View Road and is adjacent to Upper Newport Bay, which
contains a number of Public View Points. The intent of the designated streets is to
provide view corridors to the ocean and bay. Because the proposed monopole is
located on the western side of Irvine Avenue, staff believes that it does not impact any
views towards the ocean or bay; however, the visual effects of the monopole should be
minimized.
Conformance with Chapter 15.70 (Wireless Telecommunication Facilities)
Chapter 15.70 is available online at the following link:
http:// www. codepublishinq. com /CA/NewportBeach / ?NewportBeach 15 /NewportBeach 1570. html
Chapter 15.70 of the Municipal Code includes technology, location, height, and design
requirements for Telecom facilities. The stated purpose of Chapter 15.70 is:
"The purpose of this chapter is to provide for wireless telecommunication
( "telecom ") facilities on public and private property consistent with federal law
while ensuring public safety, reducing the visual effects of telecom equipment on
public streetscapes, protecting scenic, ocean and coastal views, and otherwise
mitigating the impacts of such facilities. More specifically, the regulations
contained herein are intended to:
1. Encourage the location of antennas in non - residential areas.
2. Strongly encourage co- location at new and existing antenna sites.
3. Encourage telecom facilities to be located in areas where adverse impacts
on the community and on public views are minimized."
Location and Height
Most often Telecom facilities in the City are located on existing buildings attached to the
walls or behind parapets. Others are located on Southern California Edison utility poles,
light standards, and other existing structures. The proposed project is the first false tree
application to be reviewed by the City Council. Section 15.70.050.13 (Location) provides
eight location categories in priority order that are listed below. A new false tree is
prioritized fifth out of the eight categories. The following location categories "e" through
"h" are referred for review by City Council under the provisions of Section 15.70.070:
,,a. Wall, roof or existing co- location structure or site;
b. Existing pole, light standard, or utility tower;
c. Commercial sign or architectural feature;
d. New or existing "stealth" structure other than a false tree;
e. New false tree;
f. New "Slim Jim" monopole (i.e. with no antenna elements other than the pole
itself);
4
Mobilitie Telecommunications Permit (PA2010 -073)
February 12, 2013
Page 5
g. New standard monopole with attached antenna elements;
h. New lattice tower."
Section 15.70.050.B.2 specifies that review by City Council is required for installation of
the Telecom antennas located on a new false tree or above the maximum permitted
height limit due to the potential for greater- than -usual visual or other impacts on nearby
property owners, residents, and businesses.
Municipal Code Section 15.70.050 (Height and Location) specifies that the City Council
may approve antennas up to 15 feet above the maximum height limit. The subject
property is located within the City's 32/37 height limit area as specified in Section
20.30.060.C.2 (Height Limit Areas). The maximum height limit for antennas is 50 feet in
this height limit area; therefore, the proposed monopole at 62 feet high exceeds this
height limit and falls into the category requiring City Council approval.
Pursuant to Section 15.70.050.B.2, the applicant seeking approval for the false tree
over 50 feet in height must show to the satisfaction of the City Council that:
"a. Higher priority locations are either not available or are not feasible;
b. Establishment of a facility on a new standard monopole or lattice tower is
necessary to provide service; and
c. Lack of such a facility would result in a denial of service."
a. Higher priority locations are either not available or are not feasible
The applicant determined that higher priority locations (location categories a -d above)
are not feasible for this project. Pursuant to Section 15.70.030 (Definitions) "feasible"
means capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable
period of time, taking into account environmental, physical, legal and technological
factors. As described in the applicant's project description and justification (Attachment
A), the false tree monopole is necessary because the existing church building and cross
are not high enough to meet the Verizon Wireless coverage objectives. The applicant
considered alternative designs including a replacement cross structure and a new
church tower. The applicant contends that a replacement cross at a height that meets
the coverage objectives is not feasible within the limitations of the existing building
design, structural requirements, and height restrictions, and that a replacement cross
structure up to 50 feet in height would be out of proportion with the existing church
building. The applicant determined that a new, freestanding architectural structure
would need to be in the same location as the proposed monopole, and at the required
height it would not integrate well with the architecture and design of the existing church
buildings. The Municipal Code prioritizes architectural elements over a new false tree,
and staff believes that a clock tower, bell tower, or other architectural structure may be
feasible.
J
Mobilitie Telecommunications Permit (PA2010 -073)
February 12, 2013
Page 6
b. Establishment of a facility on a new standard monopole or lattice tower is necessary
to provide service
The applicant believes that a new false tree is the best option for the site and the
monopole is necessary to facilitate future collocation and to meet the Verizon Wireless
coverage objectives. The Verizon Wireless antennas would provide additional coverage
for the PCS and cellular service, but the facility is especially necessary for the new
4G /LTE coverage. The proposed facility would improve outdoor coverage for Verizon
Wireless and provide indoor cellular coverage that is currently marginal or nonexistent.
The applicant purports that the existing carriers on site that intend to collocate on the
proposed monopole require their antennas to be mounted higher than they are now on
the existing church building in order to meet their current coverage objectives and
improve customer service. However, staff is unable to validate this assertion because
the other carriers have not applied for Telecom permits in conjunction with this
application, and coverage maps and other information used to determine necessity
have not been submitted for review.
c. Lack of such a facility would result in a denial of service
According to the coverage maps provided in the application, a gap in Verizon Wireless
coverage exists; therefore, without any type of facility, there would be a denial of service
for the Verizon Wireless network. The applicant submitted substantiation of the
coverage gap and coverage maps (Attachment B) for Verizon Wireless demonstrating
the change in coverage that would result in lowering the center mounted antenna height
to 51 feet, 44 feet, and 37 feet, compared with the proposed 59 feet (62 feet at the top
of the structure). The coverage maps do not show a drastic change in coverage at the
different heights, but the applicant has indicated that is due to a limitation of the
software used to generate the maps and has stated that a lack of coverage would exist
with a lower monopole. The applicant's intent is to ensure in -house and in -car coverage
can be provided to the surrounding area.
Staff believes that the coverage maps do not clearly demonstrate the need for the
Verizon Wireless antennas to be at a minimum of 62 feet in height and if the City were
to approve a lower height that it will not result in a denial of service. Furthermore, as
part of this application, there is insufficient information for staff to analyze the needs of
future carriers that may choose to relocate to the monopole, so it is not possible to
determine if there is a coverage need at this time.
Collocation Requirements
To limit the adverse visual effects of a proliferation of Telecom sites in the City, Section
15.70.050.0 (Co- Location Requirements) requires a new Telecom facility proposed
within 1,000 feet of an existing facility to collocate on the same site as the existing
facility unless the reviewing authority determines, based on evidence submitted by the
NO
Mobilitie Telecommunications Permit (PA2010 -073)
February 12, 2013
Page 7
applicant, that collocation is not feasible. Pursuant to Section 15.70.050.0.2, no more
than three Telecom facilities may collocate at a single site unless the City Council finds
that:
',a. The net visual effect of locating an additional facility at a collocation site will be
less than establishing a new location; or
b. Based on evidence submitted by the applicant, there is no available feasible
alternate location for a proposed new facility."
In this geographic area, due to Upper Newport Bay and residential uses in the area, not
many alternate sites are available for Telecom facilities because the Municipal Code
does not allow Telecom facilities in residential or open space zoning districts. The
applicant identified four alternate locations and evaluated the potential of each location
to meet code requirements and Verizon Wireless coverage objectives, and determined
that there is no available feasible alternate location for the proposed facility. The four
sites are the Monte Vista High School in the City of Costa Mesa, Upper Back Bay
Nature Preserve, YMCA, and Bay Corporate Plaza. The applicant has stated that the
alternate sites are located too far north to meet the coverage objectives to the south,
and there would be overlap with the yet un -built Verizon Wireless Telecom facility in
Santa Ana Heights. The applicant finds this area difficult to service because of the
limited sites available in the area to construct Telecom facilities.
Staff does have concerns with the collocation aspects of the proposed project. The first
concern is that the requested height is intended to accommodate future collocation
opportunities on the monopole. The Municipal Code encourages collocation for up to
three carriers on a single site; however as stated previously, the property already
accommodates four carriers. The proposed project is intended to accommodate Verizon
Wireless, as well as three additional carriers, for a potential total of eight carriers on the
subject property. This may lead to an over concentration of collocated Telecom
facilities on one site.
The applicant received letters of intent to collocate on the monopole from three carriers:
T- Mobile, AT &T, and Metro PCS. T- Mobile and AT &T are currently located on the
church building. Since this application was submitted, T- Mobile received City approval
to replace their existing antennas on and within the church building. AT &T currently has
antennas on and within the church building, which is the first priority location of the
location categories. Staff would recommend that the existing carriers remain on and
within the building and /or cross, which are specified in the code as a higher priority
location category. This will address staff's concern that this project may encourage
relocation from current higher priority locations to lower priority locations.
7
Mobilitie Telecommunications Permit (PA2010 -073)
February 12, 2013
Page 8
Design Standards
Section 15.70.060 (Design Standards) requires proposed freestanding antennas to be
visually compatible with surrounding buildings and vegetation. In reviewing this
application, the City Council shall consider the blending, screening, and size of the
proposed facility.
1. Blending. The extent to which the proposed facility blends into the surrounding
environment or is architecturally integrated into structure.
2. Screening. The extent to which the proposed facility is concealed, screened or
camouflaged by existing or proposed new topography, vegetation, buildings or
other structures.
3. Size. The total size of the proposed facility, particularly in relation to
surrounding and supporting structures."
A false eucalyptus design was chosen by the applicant because of the existing
eucalyptus trees on site. The proposed 62 -foot height is comparable to other
eucalyptus trees on site, which range from approximately 50 feet to 80 feet in height.
As proposed, the bark would be painted to match the bark of the nearby eucalyptus
trees. The branches and leaves are intended to screen the antennas from view. The
proposed equipment would be located adjacent to the church building and existing
equipment for other carriers, and would be screened from view with a block wall painted
and textured to match the existing church wall.
The design of the proposed monopole is intended to minimize its visibility to surrounding
residents, as well as to pedestrians and vehicle traffic on Irvine Avenue and persons
using Upper Newport Bay. While the applicant's Options One and Two reduce the
monopole height from 62 feet to 57 feet and 56 feet, respectively, staff recommends
that a comparative analysis be conducted with the monopole height at 50 feet.
Should the City Council wish to see additional design alternatives, staff recommends
that one or more of the following alternatives be considered further:
a) Increase Cross Height: Reconstruct the existing cross from 34 feet to an
approximate height of 50 feet, which would allow Verizon Wireless to collocate
with the existing carriers of Sprint and Clearwire. This height may support one
additional carrier. Staff notes that the existing leases between Sprint, Clearwire,
and the church will likely require modification.
b) Modify Church Building: There may be an opportunity to incorporate an
architectural feature into the church building design that could house one or more
carriers. This may include modification to the roof design to increase its height to
37 feet.
c) Construct a Freestanding Architectural Structure: A complementary
architectural structure, such as a clock or bell tower, that is detached from the
0
Mobilitie Telecommunications Permit (PA2010 -073)
February 12, 2013
Page 9
church building may house one or multiple carriers. The approximate height
would be 50 feet.
Findings
Section 15.70.070.F.3 provides that proposed Telecom facilities subject to review by the
City Council may be approved if City Council makes the following findings:
,,a. The approval is necessary to allow the facility to function as intended and
identified alternatives to the proposal are not feasible.
b. The approved facility will not result in conditions which are materially
detrimental to nearby property owners, residents, and businesses, or to public
health and safety."
The applicant states that the proposed project is necessary for Verizon Wireless to meet
its coverage objectives. Further, the applicant claims that the additional height is also
required for collocation because a minimum vertical separation is required between
antennas and because the antennas need to be at a minimum height above the church
building to reduce potential interference. As previously discussed, the applicant
analyzed alternate sites and determined that those sites are not feasible because of
overlapping coverage to the north and a gap in coverage to the south. The applicant
also considered on site alternatives including a replacement cross and new architectural
structure, and concluded that those options would be out of proportion with the existing
church buildings.
Alternatives
Should the City Council wish to make the required findings that the project is in
conformance with Chapter 15.70, staff requests that the application be continued to
February 26, 2013, so that staff can prepare a draft resolution for approval of the project
as directed.
Should the City Council determine that the required findings cannot be made and the
proposed project does not meet the purpose and intent of Chapter 15.70, staff requests
that the City Council continue the application to February 26, 2013, and direct staff to
prepare a draft resolution for denial of the project.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Staff recommends the City Council
find this
project exempt from the
California
Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA ")
pursuant
to Section 15303 (Class
3 — New
Construction or Conversion of Small
Structures)
of the CEQA Guidelines,
California
Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter
3, because it has no potential
to have a
significant effect on the environment.
Class 3
exempts the construction
of limited
I
Mobilitie Telecommunications Permit (PA2010 -073)
February 12, 2013
Page 10
numbers of new, small facilities or structures and installation of small new equipment
and facilities in small structures.
NOTICING
Notice of this hearing was mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the property,
published in the Daily Pilot, and posted at the project site a minimum of 10 days in
advance of this meeting consistent with the Municipal Code. Additionally, the item
appeared on the agenda for this meeting, which was posted at City Hall and on the City
website.
Submitted by:
Yk4ZnZt--
Kimberly Brand , AICP
Director
Attachments: A. Applicant's Project Description and Justification
B. Coverage Gap and Coverage Maps
C. Height Options
D. Photo Simulations
E. Project Plans
10
City Council
Attachment A
Applicant's Project Description and
Justification
11
12
R E L C O M
Project Name: Galaxy
Project Location: Harbor Christian Church
RealCom Associates. LLC
Authorized Agent for Mobilitie
2401 Irvine Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 9266o
Local Jurisdiction: City of Newport Beach, CA
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Applicant: Mobilitie is a developer and owner of towers, specializing in building towers to meet the
specific needs of wireless telecommunications service providers. Mobilitie offers a Lease- to -Suitl
model, which presents service providers /carriers the opportunity to have facilities built for them
without the carrier having to expend up front capital costs associated with the traditional method of
carrier construction and ownership. This results in Mobilitie retaining ownership and maintenance of
the tower while carriers become tenants of Mobilitie.
Location and Design: For the project at hand, Mobilitie is proposing a 62 -foot tall stealth tower
designed as a Eucalyptus tree ( "mono- Eucalyptus ") and for collocation, to be located at 2401 Irvine
Avenue (which property is owned by Harbor Christian Church). If approved by the City of Newport
Beach (the "City "), Verizon Wireless will be the first and immediate tenant on this stealth tower, as
they do not currently have a facility at or near this location. Other carriers have expressed interest in
collocating on this mono - Eucalyptus in the future. At present, however, Verizon Wireless is the only
carrier a part of this application. Verizon Wireless has named this site "Galaxy ", which will be
referenced throughout the materials for this application.
Zoning Designation and Siting Preference: The proposed site is located within the Private Institution
(PI) zoning designation surrounded by developed residential parcels and open space land use
designations. As shown on the Land Use Map (Figure 1) and Aerial Map (Figures 2 & 3) below, the
area surrounding Irvine Avenue is zoned residential and consists of developed residential parcels of
varying density. Additionally, the Upper Newport Bay is located adjacent to the proposed site and
cannot be developed upon. The only viable option (see Alternative Sites below for more detailed
analysis of alternate locations) for Mobilitie is to utilize the subject non - residential, developed church
parcel, especially because a wireless telecommunication use is already established within a disguised
cross structure owned and operated by another carrier. This complies with Chapter 15.70 of the
City's Municipal Code in terms of its purpose and intent of encouraging the siting of wireless facilities
in non - residential locations.
Eguioment: Verizon Wireless plans to mount a total of twelve (12) panel antennas and one (1)
directional antenna on the proposed mono - Eucalyptus. The associated equipment cabinets are to be
Page 1 of 13 Project Description & Justification Statement 2.25.12
13
located on the ground adjacent to the existing church building, the proposed tower and an existing
wireless communications compound owned and operated by another carrier not connected to this
proposed Mobilitie facility. Verizon Wireless' equipment cabinets will occupy a 13'x 17' -9" area to be
enclosed by 6 -foot tall decorative CMU block walls. The walls will have a stucco finish to match the
existing church building facade.
Visibility: Mobilitie and Verizon Wireless carefully chose to situate the proposed facility in its entirety
(tower and equipment cabinets) closer to Irvine Avenue in consideration of the residential areas to
the west of Tustin Avenue and south of Santa Isabel Avenue. Further, the proposed facility will be
located among a cluster of natural trees and tucked within the existing building envelope and
landscaped area. The project site includes approximately Fifty -six (56) Eucalyptus trees scattered
over the Church property, providing the basis for the mono - Eucalyptus design. The existing
Eucalyptus trees are generally mature, ranging in heights from 45 feet to over 65 feet in height. The
Church building will screen the equipment enclosure and the lower of portion of the mono -
Eucalyptus from the south and west views, while existing Eucalyptus trees will provide a background
for the mono - Eucalyptus from the north and east views. The mono - Eucalyptus design, in conjunction
with its location, minimizes visual impact by blending into existing surroundings, as shown by the
concurrently submitted photo simulations (attached) and Figure 6 Mobilitie Mono - Eucalyptus -_
Example Photograph.
Height: Chapter 20.30 of the City's Municipal Code sets a height limit of 50 feet for non - residential
structures, with Chapter 15.7o allowing another 15 feet in height (for a total of 65 feet) subject to City
Council's review and approval. As such, the proposed 62 -foot tall mono - Eucalyptus is within the
limits permitted by Code. The Applicant, Mobilitie, requires the tower to have an overall height of 62
feet in order for Verizon Wireless's panel antennas to have a center -line of 59 feet above ground
level to achieve its coverage objectives, while also allowing adequate antenna heights and vertical
separation for the installation of three (3) future wireless carriers. Currently, Mobilitie has
commitments and /or letters of interest /intent from T- Mobile, AT &T Wireless and Metro PCS, in
addition to the commitment from Verizon Wireless. Having a 62 -foot tall tower is also necessary for
collocation, as the proposed mono - Eucalyptus is designed to support three future carriers, for a total
of four including Verizon Wireless. The antennas of lowest future carrier must be a minimum of
seven (7) feet above the Church building, 30 feet in height, in order for radio signals to not be
blocked by the building; while the seven (7) feet separation between the four (4) antenna arrays is
the minimum necessary to avoid signal interference between the wireless carriers.
Coverage Objective: The location of wireless telecommunications facilities are based on technical
requirements including service area, geographical elevations, alignment with neighboring sites and
customer demand components. In this case, existing coverage for Verizon Wireless around Irvine
Avenue and Santa Isabel Avenue is generally weak (See Figure 4, Galaxy "Before" Coverage Map),
creating a significant gap in coverage, especially for the new 4G /LTE services. Street level coverage is
marginal and hence indoor coverage is poor due to building and clutter losses. Depending on
specific location, some Verizon customers will not be able to make calls when they are indoors.
Verizon's objective is to provide excellent coverage, both indoors and outdoors in order to give their
customers a better experience and also to provide adequate coverage in case of an emergency.
Verizon Wireless, therefore, must improve service for its subscribers in this area who rely on mobile
communication (including, but not limited to, access to emergency services). Verizon Wireless is also
interested in providing coverage for large accounts that may require service in the area such as
Southern California Edison, Newport Beach Police and Orange County Fire Authority. The subject
Page 2 of 13 Project Description & Justification Statement 2.25.12
Mil
church property is the one and only non - residential location that can meet the coverage objective
described above, especially taking into consideration the relatively flat topography of the area with
slight meandering curvature along the perimeter of Irvine Avenue and the Upper Newport Bay area.
Alternative Sites: The search area, as defined by Verizon Wireless Radio Frequency engineering
studies, had limited alternate candidates which could meet the City's locational criteria due to the
predominately residential land uses in and surrounding the search area. The following alternate
candidates were identified as the only other non - residential properties nearby, and evaluated as
potential wireless telecommunication facility locations:
A - Back Bay & Monte Vista High School, 3go Monte Vista Drive, Costa Mesa, CA 82627: This
alternate candidate is located at the corner of Monte Vista Drive and Irvine Avenue,
approximately one - quarter (%) mile north of the proposed Galaxy site location. Located in
the City of Costa Mesa, this property is zoned IR -S (Institutional & Recreational — School) and
surrounded by Residential zoning properties. This candidate could be considered a viable site
from RF and construction requirements. However, any wireless facility location on the school
property would potentially interfere with the schools operation and would be highly visible
from on -site classrooms and surrounding residential dwelling, as there are very few existing
mature trees to serve as screening. None of the existing structures were high enough to
provide the necessary antenna rad center heights needed to cover the identified coverage
gap. Therefore, the site was not considered the most appropriate location from the zoning
and design standpoint.
B - Upper Back Bay Nature Preserve, 2301 University Drive, Newport Beach. CA g266o: This
alternate candidate is located on University Drive, approximately 0.4 mile north of the
proposed Galaxy site location. This property is zoned PC 44 (Upper Newport Bay Regional
Park), and designated as Open Space in the General Plan and Coastal Plan. This candidate
was not considered feasible by Verizon Radio Frequency Engineering as it was too far north
to adequately cover the identified gap to the south, and that this alternate location would
overlap with a proposed (un- built) Verizon wireless facility to be located in the Santa Ana
Heights neighborhood. Thus, this alternate candidate was rejected.
C - Newport-Mesa Family YMCA, 2300 University Drive, Newport Beach. CA g266o: This
alternate candidate is located on University Drive, approximately 0.5 mile north of the
proposed Galaxy site location. This property is zoned PF (Public Facility). This candidate was
not considered feasible by Verizon Radio Frequency Engineering as it was too far north to
adequately cover the identified gap to the south, and that this alternate location would
overlap with a proposed (un- built) Verizon wireless facility to be located in the Santa Ana
Heights neighborhood. Thus, this alternate candidate was rejected.
D - Bay Corporate Plaza, 228o University Drive, Newport Beach. CA g266o: This alternate
candidate is located on University Drive, approximately 0.5 mile north of the proposed
Galaxy site location. This property is zoned OG (Office General). This candidate was not
considered feasible by Verizon Radio Frequency Engineering as it was too far north to
adequately cover the identified gap to the south, and that this alternate location would
overlap with a proposed (un- built) Verizon wireless facility to be located in the Santa Ana
Heights neighborhood. Thus, this alternate candidate was rejected.
Alternative Facility Designs: The height of the existing cross structure and the church roof -top do
not meet the height requirements of Verizon Wireless coverage objectives (minimum 45 -feet
Page 3 of 13
Project Description & Justification Statement 2.25.12
i5
antenna height); therefore, the height of any replacement facility would need to be substantially
expanded to meet any collocation objectives of the Applicant. Alternative architectural designs
considered for the Harbor Christian Church site included the expansion of the existing cross
structure and the addition of a new architectural tower.
Replacement Cross Structure: A replacement cross structure meeting the same collocation
and the coverage objectives of the wireless carriers would need to have a minimum height of
eighty (8o') feet, which would exceed the maximum allowable City height of 65 feet. This
projected height is based on an expanded cross design and similar antenna separation
criteria to that used for the mono - Eucalyptus. Additionally, the crossbar would have a width
of approximately 35 feet, to maintain the same proportions of the existing cross structure.
This design alternative is considered to be not viable due not meeting City of Newport Beach
height standards for wireless telecommunication facilities and the height limit for the Public
Institution zoning district. Additionally, the a cross of this height and width was thought to
be significantly out of proportion with the church building, and to have very poor
architectural aesthetics.
New Church Tower: An architectural tower to accommodate 4 wireless carriers built on the
church rooftop, or immediately adjacent to the church building, would have the same
approximate height of the proposed mono - Eucalyptus, and thus meet the City height criteria.
However, the church rooftop was not designed or built to structurally support such a tower,
thus this alternative would not be a viable option. An architectural tower built adjacent to
the church would need to be in the same location as the proposed mono - Eucalyptus, this
being the only available ground space. However, it was determined that a tower built here
would not appear integrated with the architecture of the church building, and the tower
mass could potentially interfere with the carrier antennas located in the existing cross
structure. The tower design alternative is considered to be not viable due to poor aesthetics
in relation to the existing church building and structures and structural constraints.
Conclusion: The proposed site meets the locational coverage objectives of Verizon Wireless radio
frequency engineers, meets the Newport Beach Development Code locational preference, and
provides the most up -to -date design minimizing visual impact on public views of the surrounding
community. The approval of the proposed site is necessary to allow the facility to function as
intended for the following reasons:
• The proposed site is the only viable location consistent with the Newport Beach Municipal
Code Chapter 15.70 locational preferences. The proposed location is the only non - residential
parcel suitable for the development of a collocateable wireless communication facility.
Identified Alternative Sites to the proposed Church property location are not feasible.
Alternative design options include the existing cross structure which contains wireless
antennas within the structure, and the church rooftop. These alternatives are not viable due
to height and structural constraints. The existing height of the cross facility and the church
roof -top does not meet the height requirements of Verizon Wireless coverage objectives.
Additionally, the cross structure does not contain enough structural space to house an
additional carrier within the facility.
Page 4 of 13
Project Description & Justification Statement 2.25.12
10
The approved facility will not result in conditions that are detrimental to nearby property
owners, residents and businesses, nor to public health or safety. The proposed facility is
designed in compliance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code regulations and will operate
within approved FCC standards. The proposed mono - Eucalyptus facility is designed to
minimize visual impact to the surrounding community by blending into the existing
environment among natural trees. Not only will the proposed facility not result in any
adverse impacts to the community, it will help the community by providing wireless services
especially important in case of emergencies.
The above demonstrates that the approval of the proposed site is necessary to allow the facility to
function as intended will not result in conditions which are materially detrimental to nearby property
owners, residents and businesses, nor the public health or safety.
JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
As outlined in the Newport Beach Municipal Code Chapter 15.70 the purpose and intent of
establishing wireless telecommunication facility regulations is to:
• Encourage the location of antennas in non - residential areas.
Strongly encourage collocation at new and existing antenna sites.
Encourage telecom facilities to be located in areas where adverse impacts on the community
and on public views are minimized.
To ensure compatibility with the above mentioned objectives the proposed site, Harbor Christian
Church, provides the best locational opportunity for the establishment of a wireless communication
facility. The proposed facility is located on the only feasible non - residential zoned parcel in the
vicinity requiring coverage, the facility is specifically designed collocation, and the faux Eucalyptus
tree is designed to minimize visual impacts and blend into the surrounding environment. As depicted
in Figure 1, Newport Beach Land Use Map, the proposed site is the only non - residential zoned parcel
within the area which is compatible with the purpose and intent of Chapter 15.70. The proposed site
meets the locational coverage objectives of Verizon Wireless radio frequency engineers, meets the
Newport Beach Development Code locational preference, and provides the most up to date design
minimizing visual impacts on public views of the surrounding community. The proposed site is
designed in compliance with Newport Beach Municipal Code Chapter 15.7o and Chapter 20.30 and
does not pose any adverse impacts on the surrounding community.
Compliance with Municipal Code 15.70.050.6.2: Chapter 15.70.050.6.2 Special Requirements
specifies that the applicant shall be required to show to the satisfaction of the Council that:
a. Higher priority locations are either not available or are not feasible.
Analysis — The Code specifies priority locations in the following order:
• Wall, roof or existing co- location structure or site;
• Existing pole, light standard, or utility tower;
• Commercial sign or architectural feature;
Page 5 of 13 Project Description & Justification Statement 2.25.12
27
• New or existing "stealth" structure other than a false tree;
Priority locations included exploring the feasibility of the existing cross structure which
contains wireless antennas within the structure and the church rooftop. These alternatives are
not viable due to height and structural constraints. The existing height of the cross facility and
the church roof -top did not meet the height requirements of Verizon Wireless coverage
objectives. Additionally, the cross structure did not contain enough structural space to house an
additional carrier within the existing facility.
The proposed site provided the most compatible location to accommodate the mono -
Eucalyptus design which was the best alternative that provided the required height to meet
Verizon Wireless' coverage objectives. Additionally, the mono - Eucalyptus design provides an
opportunity for collocation of additional carriers, provides the most visual screening, and
blends into the cluster of existing trees which minimizes visual impacts to the traveling public
and surrounding community.
b. Establishment of a facility on a new standard monopole or lattice tower is necessary to
provide service.
Analysis -As stated in section a, the establishment of a facility of a new stealth monopole is
necessary to provide service in the area because the proposed site and design was the only
alternative that met the height requirements for Verizon Wireless coverage objectives, the
proposed design allows collocation opportunities, and the proposed design provides the best
visual screening of associated antennas and equipment. As previously stated the location of
wireless telecommunications facilities are based on technical requirements which include
service area, geographical elevations, radio frequency height requirements, alignment with
neighboring sites and customer demand components. Establishment of a new mono - Eucalyptus
is required to meet the structural and height requirements to provide service to the coverage
area. Because the existing cross facility and existing church facility pose structural and height
constraints the best feasible option is the installation of a mono - Eucalyptus which provides the
necessary height to meet Verizon Wireless coverage objectives and the design provides
collocation opportunities for future carriers.
c. Lack of such a facility would result in a denial of service.
Analysis - This proposed site is a Verizon Wireless "coverage" site designed to enhance services
in the area of the proposed project. The lack of this facility would result in a gap in the Verizon
Wireless' network coverage of the area. As shown on the coverage maps, the proposed facility
in combination with the existing "neighboring" facilities will provide continuous network
coverage to the entire community surrounding Upper Newport Bay and the residential
communities adjacent to the 55 and 73 Freeways. As demonstrated in Figure 4, Galaxy "Before"
Coverage Map, and Figure 5, Galaxy "After" Coverage, the proposed facility will enhance
services to the residential communities along Irvine Avenue and the traveling public along Irvine
Avenue and the Upper Newport Bay area. Lack of the facility would result in denial of service to
the traveling public along Irvine Avenue and the residential community surrounding Irvine
Avenue, Santiago Drive, and Santa Isabel Avenue.
Page 6 of 13 Project Description & Justification Statement 2.25.12
Zg
Compliance with Municipal Code Chapter 15.070.F: Chapter 15.07o.F specifies that applications
subject to special review may be approved by the City Council if it makes the following findings:
a. The approval is necessary to allow the facility to function as intended and identified
alternatives to the proposal are not feasible.
Analysis —As previously stated, the establishment of a new stealth monopole is necessary to
provide service in the area because the proposed site and design is the only alternative that
meets the height requirements of Verizon Wireless coverage objectives, the proposed design
allows collocation opportunities, and the proposed design provides the best visual screening of
associated antennas and equipment. The location of wireless telecommunications facilities are
based on technical requirements which include service area, geographical elevations, radio
frequency height requirements, alignment with neighboring sites and customer demand
components. Establishment of a new mono - Eucalyptus is required to meet the structural and
height requirements to provide service to the coverage area.
Priority locations included the Alternative Sites previously identified and exploring the existing
cross structure which contains wireless antennas within the structure and the church rooftop.
These Alternative Sites were not viable options due to site locations restrictions or Radio
Frequency inadequacies, while the Church roof top and cross were not viable options due to
height and structural constraints. The existing height of the cross facility and the church
rooftop do not meet the height requirements of Verizon Wireless' coverage objectives.
Additionally, the cross structure did not contain enough structural space to house an additional
carrier within the existing facility.
The proposed site provided the most compatible location to accommodate the mono -
Eucalyptus design which was the best alternative that provided the required height to meet
Verizon Wireless coverage objectives. Additionally, the mono - Eucalyptus design provides an
opportunity for collocation of additional carriers, provides the most visual screening, and
blends into the cluster of existing trees which minimizes visual impacts to the traveling public
and surrounding community.
Page 7 of 13 Project Description & Justification Statement 2.25.12
19
b. The approved facility will not result in conditions which are materially detrimental to
nearby property owners, residents, and businesses, or the public health and safety.
Analysis - The structure of the General Plan is developed to guide growth and protect the
health, safety, and general welfare of its residents. By designing the proposed facility in
compliance with the General Plan and Newport Beach Development Code the proposed project
will not compromise the health, safety and general welfare of the City of Newport Beach
residents. The facility will not generate any traffic, will not emit significant amounts of
pollutants, and will not pose any significant visual impacts on the surrounding community.
Mobilitie and Verizon Wireless are regulated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
and are authorized to operate. Verizon's telecommunications facilities operate at the lowest
possible power levels and are well below established standards used by the FCC for safe human
exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields. These standards have been tested and
proven safe by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the Institute of Electrical
and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). The proposed facility will operate under the purview of FCC
and the 1996 Telecommunications Act. Please reference the attached FCCguide on radio
frequency information related to health. The proposed communications facility will operate in
full compliance with the FCC adopted standards for radio frequency emissions as published by
ANSI.
Page 8 of 13
Project Description & Justification Statement 2.25.12
ME
Proposed She
A
0
B
UPPER
NEWPORT
177
N,N' V i a _ f(r�-n11 N
Figure i Newport Beach Land Use Map - The proposed site is the one and only non-
residential parcel suited for wireless development consistent with Municipal Code Chapter
15.70, which encourages the location of antennas in non - residential areas, encourages
collocation opportunities, and located in an area able to minimize visual impact on
community and public views. The proposed site and the Alternative Sites (A -D) identified are
shown on the above map.
Page 9 of 13 Project Description & Justification Statement 2.25.12
21
Figure z Aerial Map of Proposed Site — As depicted in this aerial map, the proposed site is
surrounded by developed residential parcels and undevelopable open space designation of
Upper Newport Bay.
Figure 3 Zoomed Aerial Map of Proposed Site • As depicted above, the proposed facility will
be located adjacent to Irvine Avenue and tucked within the existing building envelope and
natural trees within a landscaped area.
Page 10 of 13
Project Description & Justification Statement 2.25.12
22
Figure 4. Galaxy "Before" Coverage Map — As demonstrated by the above map the
surrounding area encompassing the proposed site, indicated by the yellow and red areas,
lack adequate signal coverage. Without the proposed site, the area adjacent to Irvine
Avenue, Upper Newport Bay and the surrounding residential neighborhood would lack
coverage.
Page 11 of 13
Project Description & Justification Statement 2.25.12
23
�: V$pyr Neryport Bay
Figure 5. Galaxy "After" Coverage Map — As indicated by the green area on the above map
the proposed site will provide coverage to the residential community along Irvine Avenue
and the Upper Newport Bay, as well as, the traveling public along Irvine Avenue. The
proposed site, in combination with existing /neighboring Verizon Wireless sites, will enhance
service to the entire community along 55 and 73 freeways and the residential community
surrounding the Upper Newport Bay area.
Page 12 of 13
Project Description & Justification Statement 2.25.12
Mil
Figure 6 - Mobilitie Mono - Eucalyptus - Example Photograph
Page 13 of 13
Project Description & Justification Statement 2.25.12
25
M
City Council
Attachment B
Coverage Gap and Coverage Maps
27
22
EXHIBIT 4.12
4.12 Description of Significant Gap
a). The location of wireless telecommunications facilities are based on technical requirements
including service area, geographical elevations, alignment with neighboring sites and customer
demand components. In this case, existing coverage for Verizon Wireless in the area around Irvine
Avenue and Santa Isabel Avenue is generally weak creating a significant gap in coverage, especially
for the new 4G /LTE services. The geographic area of the coverage gap is generally bounded by Del
Mar Avenue to the north, by the Upper Newport Bay to the east, by 21'` Street to the south and by
Orange Avenue to the west.
b). An street -level map of the Verizon Wireless coverage area is attached, Exhibit 4.12(b).
c). The above geographic area is approximately 1.5 square miles in size.
d). A'significant gap" in radio signal coverage is thought to exist when street level coverage is
marginal and hence indoor coverage is poor due to building and clutter losses. Depending on
specific location, some Verizon customers will not be able to make calls when they are indoors.
e). Verizon's objective is to provide excellent coverage, both indoors and outdoors in order to give
their customers a better experience and also to provide adequate coverage in case of an
emergency. Verizon Wireless, therefore, seeks to improve service for its subscribers in this area who
rely on mobile communication (including, but not limited to, access to emergency services). Verizon
documents areas having high subscriber complaints for dropped calls and slow speeds, or weak
radio signals measured by radio frequency testing.
f). It is unknown as to what criteria is used by other wireless carriers in Newport Beach to precisely
measure a "significant gap ". However, each carrier does use the above general concerns.
g). The definition of "significant gap" used in subsection 4.12(d) above, is generally to same
definition used by this carrier for other projects in the City of Newport Beach.
h.1). The coverage area affects Irvine Avenue, a major commuter roadway. Currently, commuters
may experience dropped calls or lack of service due to poor coverage and capacity, especially for
newer 4G & LTE services, while traveling between the John Wayne Airport business area to
residential and commercial areas to the south.
h.z). The coverage area consists primarily of residential neighborhoods, with the Upper Newport
Bay recreational and open space area to the east. Irvine Avenue provides a major commuter
roadway through the proposed coverage area.
h.3). The proposed Galaxy cell site will improve weak signals, especially for older generation
phones, and will provide new coverage for the newer generation services such as 4G and LTE. Radio
Frequency Propagation Maps — Exhibits 6.03 (Before) and 6.05 (After) demonstrate lack of
coverage and projected facility coverage.
h.4). Irvine Avenue is a well traveled commuter road which lacks adequate signal coverage,
including, but not limited to roaming capabilities.
h.5). No "test drive" information is available.
h.6) No commercial district lays within the proposed Galaxy coverage area.
h.7). Street level coverage is marginal and hence indoor coverage is poor due to building and
29
clutter losses. Depending on specific location, some Verizon customers will not be able to make calls
when they are indoors, including, but not limited to, access to emergency services. Thus a risk to
public safety is posed. Verizon Wireless also desires to provide coverage for large accounts that may
require service in the area such as Southern California Edison, Newport Beach Police and Orange
County Fire Authority.
1). Refer to Radio Frequency Propagation Maps — Exhibits 6.03 (Before) and 6.05 (After) to
demonstrate the current lack of signal coverage and projected facility coverage.
4.12 (b) • Approximate geographic boundary of significant gap in Verizon Wireless radio signal coverage
30
1
Ec Plot— Galaxy ON Air @ 37ft
L MESA VERDE PCCS i
NCI
FAIRGROUN
=AJFAIRGROUNDS
•'J"• AIRPORTI
61 71�
NM� AIRPORTER
_�
L MAR�ORC
SIR � d_
JAMBOREE PC
JAMBOREE
..�
.
! . r - Nip a o ,
will k . ir
S: y
111111 _a4
Aw
MhW
rM
' al
CM: RSSI (dBm)
■ >_ 75
❑ > =.85
■ > = -95
Sc 18. 121358
V *IBIM WPORT BAY TEI`
GeoPlw v6.0 'ORT BAY TEMP
N ISLAND
DUPON-
DUPC
u'%
. - NFWP[ 1RT C:TR PI'S
31
JLvw.
. - NFWP[ 1RT C:TR PI'S
31
1
Lei: Cel l Name
ANCIA P
W`
C■. RSSI IdBml -
■ > 75
❑ > a5 ■
■ > = -95
Scale. 121358 L ■ _ - -
PORT BAV TEMP m'
GeoPIm v6.0 ORT BAY TEMP PCS •
PmOmlayand Conide Mel _}kCgWw
Ec Plot — Galaxy ON Air @ 44ft
A VEHL
VERDE
WORT FWV
• AIRPORT
A] AIRPORTER
DEL MAROC PCS
AIRGROUNDS DEL MAROC
2GROUNDS PCS `�'
yJAMBOREE PCS
JAMBOREE
■
EACKBAV PCS •
BACKBAY %
NN
GALAXY f AA
r
=�, ; -_•... BISON PCS �•
. ■— w
BIG ;VN—
BIG CYN PC31
ASHION ISLA
NEWPORT C
FWPORT CTR
T ■
S2
1
Lei: Cel l Name
IAN
ANCIA P
I!`
C■. RSSI (dBm) f■y"„
■ > 75
❑ > 8.5 -
■ > = -95
Scale: 121358 i L ■
verAze"Wreless PORT BRV TE
GeoPIm v6.0 ORT BAV TEMP PCs
Ec Plot — Galaxy ON Air @ 51ft
A VEHL
VERDE
WORT FWV
ASHION ISLA
DEL I•:1.LRnC PCs
g DEL MAROC
PCs 1w
URPORT
PORTER
'JAMBOREE
ALAxY ' f
�ti '
r
4
BISL
' 1. . IF + ■B
"a..
r
BIG CYN
BIG CYN PCs
WORT C
'ORT CTR
AV PCs
KBAV %
. `
f
pe +�
J _ i^ `n
Ilk
33
S4
City Council
Attachment C
Height Options
S5
so
62' Top of Branch
61' Top of Antenna
59'
57' Bottom of Antenna
2' m/w 56' Top of Dish
54' Bottom of Dish
53' Top of Antenna
51'
49' Bottom of Antenna
3' separation
46' Top of Antenna
44'
42' Bottom of Antenna
3' separation
39' Top of Antenna
37'
CURRENT
Galaxy
2401 Irivne Ave., Newport Beach, CA 92660
_ 57' Top of Branch
56' Top of Antenna
54'
52' Bottom of Antenna
2' m/w a49' Top of Dish
Bottom of Dish
3' separation
46' Top of Antenna
44'
42' Bottom of Antenna
3' separation
39' Top of Antenna
37'
— _ T
OPTION ONE
56' Top of Branch
55' Top of Antenna
53'
51' Bottom of Antenna
2' m/w a48' Top of Dish
Bottom of Dish
46' Top of Antenna
44'
42' Bottom of Antenna
3' separation
39' Top of Antenna
37'
OPTION TWO
Mobilitie
01/29/13
37
S2
City Council
Attachment D
Photo Simulations
39
IN
mobilitie
GALAXY
2401 IRVINE AVENUE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
ARTISTIC
engineering ng
AEsims.com
877.9AEA=
`jow
mobilitie
GALAXY
2401 IRVINE AVENUE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
ARTISTIC
engineering ng
AEsims.com
877.9AEA=
-4-2
mobilitie
GALAXY
2401 IRVINE AVENUE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
dM ARTISTIC
engineering ng
AEsims.com
8779AE.slms
-4-3
mobilitie
GALAXY
2401 IRVINE AVENUE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
ARTISTIC
engineering ng
AEsims.com
877.9AEA=
W
mobilitie
GALAXY
2401 IRVINE AVENUE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
ARTISTIC
engineering ng
AEsims.com
8779AE.slms
45
:'lw
City Council
Attachment E
Project Plans
47
M90
... ....8 +'u°
/Is
DO
IORiH
VICINITY MAP
NI OUT MOM MNINI_ OLDER IN NEVBOARI BEACH.
START COPTHEAST ON DEMPARY CENTER BB TAc
AND PILL ON
m
M-1 N
TURN MARK
1S9N GAIN AT SUGAR M, IT.' IMF IN 11 DEPTH ore
"TN ESE E A HRR. TA ti VILA O
A E AT zHl HMAND .
DRIVING DIRECTIONS
telecommunications infrastructure
GALAXY
2401 IRVINE AVE.
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660
PROPEPIY nwN1,
Hn9CCR pN611NY CHURCH
z<ol GVINE A". 11 rIYI1
CONTACT: "Y" '-MM
NONE: '949) G4: -9SJ1
111111ANN
O . T
- CENTER NE
U HE LGAS
wPom SLASH. ueuEnNNSE Sven
CAPPED : SK PANIADUA
TESTS, (9.9) IDzao
AUNT .,SRI CAEMHTESNLLCN
I&I RU 9SAM AE.. SUITE SPA
IRVIN ZCNINC x0.v.CEN: TIM ROGERS
PHONE. (9.9) 295 -9931
IN pIrc PITCHER THE OF 1.RN TERM
CUM N. ZONING BRUNK INSTITUTION
EP1GUN", N., 1ttE 12-ON
(E) 9U IDING ANGUNMANCY _
PROJECT INFORMATION
THE PROTEST CCNOMES Or THE INSTALLATION AND OPITN11C4 BE n 1.
FAIL",C"N GAELITT 1llVN'Gll NS NL1IGN111 TIES A 1 IN GEE( 1) N IZON
wEIESS non EL nmIN111 AND IT )ENRON AIRINESS DIMENSIONAL ANKARA
H.E. . RINS LOCATION ON TOY% NGLYPTVS EE O E FORM NA
T
GREAFLED ON A f TS TREE Oi THE
BE UE ZCM BUTLERS, IE
(LWIG TERM LVOWMN) IL+1'NOPN.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ALL 'GLEN AND PWtYW1
ILOLI AND BENEFITS IN
.1 THE -FEST EFFORTS- OE THE
EASED AS ADOPTED
DEPOSITS AUTHOTTIM NOTH NO IN T-ESE
NAVY IS ED BE CONSTRUED TO ROME
MARK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE ANNE
ONTACT
Cv L4CL DIACONV
2 10 CALF 1DM.NNRVYA1 CODE
2010 BY GRE FOUR
QrvCI 1111f5 2P F SETT
HILLS CA F)No
2 ftFO
• NIU NOI CGG6
"ITIAIGL
SI /EX 14NW TAKE CRISPY
.1
• 2010 (ALIMIA COOES
NIP -111
111A-
11 UND 16
zoo 1111nw F', 11
F
nw:
<%auRNO RD'S
CODE COMPLIANCE
aaceUCCc
MAL .M RESONATES us
DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS
12 sE AR VAN VARY. surtE z1
Z
CONIRACTOi' SH4C RARITY AL. PLAYS ADD EDGERS DIMENSIONS H+O WNBNONAS
ONTACT
Cv L4CL DIACONV
mE I SHE AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY HO HE
IEY T AND /OR
«.. v1.9
(W
NG OA o DISCREPANCIES PAHEECT
_ _ BEOH� THE
EMaIL < �•, <I��.vN <. <.m
oho �<
HN 1H B� RESPONSIBLE
CONSULTING TEAM
CONTRACTOR NOTES
nwMilitis
IFE DEFFS111n
RESRLCOM
m =emEn N
APPROVE wM
Gro
No FORD
FROUNI GALAXY
�HIZ.m Ixnrve nvE.
NEwPOHI NEAGH. G 92660
OR ENEEI III+L ry
TITLE SHEET
wAwN e< c MK DY INFORMATION G51 mle
Nsw Po I lO,cnw..
SUCH HIDDEN
T -1
T9
50
•.R••
litiess"s
li TOR' Pt xfR pilON
I'. THE COUNTY OR oav sr,F a 115CRIBED AS IX1 ”'
srnEn E NOTE
_ 10.
IL , 2009 ALL
-- —
qa.
„N
- warvC�„c r..
OF ,.Nx -. SAFE r . r xN�..,Np,
xa�.f
E .xsn 1E,sE
°'_
EXCEPT 0 ALL OIL. BE AT MINERAL AND
ssssns�_.m,mrusnssn i.
ANATME NAME KNOWN FLAT MAY - - - o°VC CESE`RSEES. EN
WHEY TRUE PEAPPETIALL RENT CA WILLING MAPS, ITALSOUNI A OPERATION III "WAS ANN 'ABOARD DIS SAME MESA
SLBYI:Y53S Noipc
GRAPHIC SCALE
PROJECT INFORMATION'.
-
A 10 LAND LESS 'AID LAND AM ANY OTHER LAND, N TATLE 11CLOP TO ALIST CA OR - ♦ rx r e RS CORDS , DETERMINE
$
AN AND. OPEC NINU. 'I'- THESE ULTRASONIC IFICESES. OIL IN CA, MASON TUNNELS AND SHE TO "TO, OR ACRO$� LIFE SAI OF �E LAND HERSINAQQVE DESCRIBED , LD ALI SUCH SUIPAGRALS 'R
CIARTUARALLY PRETAX MALLONS, TUNNELS ANN GRAITS IN"' "I FIRATEN ON 11-1 IS, AIDES AD HAN' ON ... HE
HE MCI CONS PREC A PMx9,.Y EJPKV OF ME PPWEAIY. INFORMATION .np USES
�
G
ANN TO RUNCRINT. REFOREST, EQUI, MANTAN. REPAIR 1111 D AND EME-ATE AN' DUTY ITT' OR MINE', EXTHAUT.
e-ln
GALAXY
NO NEWS THE RIGHT T� WILL. I '
SUBLURF CE OF DUE LAND DOVE DESCRIBED. AN RESERK° IN THE OECD RECORDED APFU 25. 1965 IN 5 A., 6583
FLOOOUnZOnwESxO
,i
ASCP
O, IRVINE nVENUS
?AGE .c u CRUCIAL RECORDS.
- - _
NIGER ZONE "' AREAS UP ADD LEAR FLOOD
NEW PORT I'D'
^2660
ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 439-152-01
COONTYOF ORANGE
AR AS
By ALAN TODAY
oc
A
i tt NOTES
OR ING O PENAERAL�EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
t
ORIGINAL ISSUE OAiE'
N INSURANCE D
v,sPW0°HAPPY �DAT
= AGENCY'
&ATLGALLUrIgUa PRIOR TO CONE,RDCnG. REJG,A.. RmCAPON AND/ UP RpLAa,JENT 15 THE RESPONNR�D,Y
E0505awxz5C°i. ±O DECEUOER 01 05.
s
A
'
IL
09/2t/201 2
E�ARK
w �'
..Ns
-++t
-', DniE DESCre moN', ar
SECT REVALSESS LOWSLISTRALD LOW AIDS BUREAU ORTHOMETINS YEARS By APPINCATING, OF AIDS DENIED ON
ACAME ED P Pz DATA PROCESSED_ s
CURVE TABLE
Y »A
0
MET9
PAT ALL UNNACTIONS SHOWN HEREON DOE REFERENCED TO LAPTOPS b
BA+ fREADINGe
?°,
HE OR,
r " "OSJ W Wixn,L SAUDI C,U,trnw. STATE PLANE
CANDIDATE ZONE M DEIERU S OY ms c6ERVATIONS
q
SURVEY DATE
m /rzapp
Q RFC9 ONS TO 5 iE
FROM MODUTE
HEAD WEST ry N er:ECENTEER NEWPORT TOBAGO SANTA
A 311 4 2 TAKE TIE AT START ONTO SANTA
%
RD 0 4 DATO THE NET GIANT ONTO TASSELS RD
�l
TAAL EXIT TH TOWARD BIRTH IT U2 AT I MERGE ON10
F7 A CREDIT C NATO iemx- AV- usnx.NOU nu
f
6E ON LIFE RI6x..
.a °ae m.E ^ NSiiN AVENUE
--- _ _ _________ __
e
R<
PREPARED 9:
pWS
eeC®® rq�
P
® a 1 V
/
FAA
-1 OR
TS4`u
°LrS9 j e6n'
{�
ITI
A
A
—
CDILLSVLLPNL:
AAgd
i
ts
AS
v
d
DUN
'
o- %.�
/
CROWN ar-_ Dv04—
os.J
a U1 edAS
T , EY
flG F C.
n F A.OrI 0
q �
NT" L u . ®g
m ".. SV /
per
LE GEND
N nLUc
i IS Nu Aa Dr aee G
LICENSED.
oo
RAIN reic a OAl U AN ARE
q RG J
Ssx.0 L11.1 'PLC
ILLY eDu
G R
CONCRETE N.mxxr un I -
- �
i w m6E DT eue.m ELECTRICAL ,R.N.rou
u_____ _ __ _ ______
/
DLl x G
:00ST Es
\
EO6AL
9LPVY
.rQn
"y sor EMISSION cc.ux cPws .o
sxeei nlE,
+—
ME L &R
2 BLS.
BOUNDARY DETAIL
nA,G -
I.
SHEET NMMa'LS -1
50
LEASE AREA EGA DESCRIPTION _ �9E5 ESG131PI1ON
THE LAND R SCENIC TO HEARD PETER IS STARTED in mE an of xw>mi BE+cx Caxn aE OA KATE a ,
COMFORT". AND IS CORRECT AS l(PUT U 'NO A PORTO' ALL PARL11 1, AD FLOOR AN A DROP NUMED IN ST 'I GAS' 'A AT PAROLE AUPI. 1. 11 GTE .1 THL LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS 91
KDORT BEACH. COUNUFF AT CHANNEL. STATE UP CALFARNIA. IN THE OFFICE OF THE IIIIIIII IF ORANCE COUNTY, A' COLLOWN
�JBNNING AT PKILL 8 , THENCE SGOADS 11 E 'A AN 'BETTS BE AIJIB PC A 21 BE FEEL PRINCE I'LL12 V A A MAP FILED IN FUJI IS PACE 11 1 'AGENT All. V THE CITY A, NEGESCH BEACH
AAO LA .1 OFFICE IF THE BACONIAN AD DAYS HARDY, AST HOURS ONLY SLIPID A ITRIA IF
LD ON BUS S OSGV ON NO500PE NORTHERLY BLIND SPEEDSTER
n IFI MORE ONE E SEvIENT, AT THE SORT
SUBJECT TO ANY AND au NATTERS OF RECORDS. OF ANY. E IHELPS N„ • O PULL SEND AT ER urtRFmDE O ASEPONT LD 10 DIE POINT N OF RPLC ANKS s GO B THE DESCRIPTION
LINE
LINE TAT E
_!NE LEND )ry
µL
PEAR] N
A OR GIP
LI
's
us
NJ
RATE
0
AND PLAY
AT
Z�
AT 122 SQUARE BID INE A' LITS ALI 1. ANY AN' ALL GATT"' A' BEAT 11 ANY
ND LAND REFTEREN TO 'ERE" BELOW IS UNWIND IN THE CITY OF NECAUGH BEACH COUNTY Of CLAUDE CAPE AT GAICI ANN IS
A LNG A POREGRAN AT PARCEL 1 AS SHEAN IN A MAP FILED IN BLACK 38 PARE 14 OP PARCEL MAPS. IN THE I I AN NE,_R BEACH
COUNTY N GRAND, COAL AT RALICAMILL, IN EPA PENCE A' LEE 11.11IR OF REYINII SAUDI OILICAN 11 'IN' I'D I N A 11S, OF
LAND CRY FEET IN DDLO THE NOWITHERLY LINE BONN GENYRRCQ A$ EQUATES
TESPS DO AT PIKE A CLOSE NNA3SNPE 12,45 FEET. THEICE SHIP 57 E 71,80 FEED LOTS AFTER REPEATED 11 A' 'DO' U, TO
IN PONT M TERM LED OF THIS DESCRIPTION
TUSTN AVENUE CANTUxwC en EQUALS BEE.. MORE OR LESS O CELT G) - L MATTERS CE RECORDS. IF ALP
�ss AREA n66ES5 oRrvc I � �, AAGI ELY
AROUND
RD
I CNO
q
I
µL
RISC ; —CATEC DESCRIPTION] DYE
BETA IN'N
SALL
RARE
's
NJ
RATE
0
AND PLAY
PRICK
TRULDRUG
OF
GRAPHIC SCALE
I can )
TOO ' PEACE PC C"D
OR�TINAUei)
I LOSE 4.R, UPOLUE,
Ae onvsuT ��e`
ro /
TO
• I
o, CLAII AREA ASIA El�ACNRIZN2121 P/
ICO
ULTI A�RINATES E
mmWiltiesms
66 New P01 Bea6F, AS I"
.1 I'D F,I, SIT 91, ITNITIS, 1.
PROJECT NFORANi ON'.
GALAXY
01 ICONS AVENUE
NEWPORT B EACH CA ^2660
COUNTY .1 ..DOE
'ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE'.
09/25/2012
RISC ; —CATEC DESCRIPTION] DYE
mENTs
;PLANS PREPARED BY
LONSVLTANT;
151
Al
(E) �rsw.... #9T+ ... I,
I' VER20N II E )
(P) PRR RE P OG.
i
RTE"' '®
wiclUi2 ((
RUN s'al )q '.1 '1 PIT �
H i - -�q vlHlzory vPCflPS5
TEEL TE 00 l" T` C (P)
� 0.Cn
4T YE Z E -. X55 s) PCIE "I
W\ IRW PR ®
a / �E, �' ®p -, s`J
C(E) C uF.. I v
o ®p
\ P
� T, ITT ® ® WRli 1111
J �
P
\ 9n \
\ /
q � EQ
� /S � /
Q C/
to 6III9RN+..E III \ /
AREA
PINE TREES
AREI
.ice m:w iffiss
"I CEYECUPNENI
RE�iRLCOM
wE &�vMw RG 505 4u
MP:4YE11 w
El Ni➢g5 WIE
NNE
GALAXY
NEwPOHI HFACH. U 92660
OR SxkEI III+Lry
SITE PLAN
w.wN e< c" 11,01.1R, wre
m wiz
11.1 NII
A -1
52
J
YCROM
`E) CARRIER EOUP_ARF--\
(E) carzeiEq
(E) ALURCH
ENLARGED SITE PLAN
lam" j
`(EA 19YL THU
(E) 21 H TEE
v(APu) )u .t � w o Cs r
X (n—micA . u
s N
P) 4,
TA)
PUNIfO EFFIC
5'-
\\
I \
11= . 1
�(F) 4HERCH BOREING
)'�TJ" uN
AT
° !
dy oa
D mmd �.ai
� —n n
A
Y �
X
�(EJ UNOCATIR ..
�(E) 11-- IRE_
`(E)Si0E1YNX�
FngAIDgi: wiles sxcm ARI N) — — --
NOPROPDEFO
WIM (k) 1HERM BWWiN6
MGNDExC0EYi1x5
nRAVrsES NoI nlrnlx m9
CuRirv.
rz. vroRE cwRIERS Nm
(E) wxwcwm nreA
VP) VNIZOIN VS
IRE,E55' ,MY
alb
RDIVAV[ DISH
\
cYBwErs
RX/y'I EW.VION. RAE
A
@H BRA BGMUIn TFD)
\
iq
V
(EI 'HUXIUnE' an SOEI,
wE mu
n
OR WICON
O
f.
\
11 -11 OUHLIll 01 (1)
'RIEE Hi6x
C=Et EIGHT
I
EEOAM1
(-) "ELI FOR
�roAr axe
ewxr )
(N"" �(A)w
—
I
ANi ONAF
sNIOR. Ua) TOTAL
A
I
I
I
M
\ -0) NGTER YEIER.
TO E REL CE9 — ✓ ✓i'WfF (E) 15 IT IREE
$/ �W 40 4R
1
\ I I
�(iPP) WE =TER
(E) SJX. RCIE —:; C
4
(E) i0 'X, THE
nxE cEUfEUFNE«I
RE�iRLCOM
% vdMw)R2Gd
wEB:
mEi09En
AE R+ Nmus ossR
GALAXY
uwsa 2n 0, IRVINE ANc'.
NEw)OHI fI FACH. CA 92660
OR CHIEF III,Ery
ENLARGED SITE PLAN
0.tAwx 8Y 4vIEEHEO .,A, VE CAIE
vsx o mwlz
5HEE1 HUMBER
A -2
153
J
NOPROPDEFO
MGNDExC0EYi1x5
nRAVrsES NoI nlrnlx m9
CuRirv.
rz. vroRE cwRIERS Nm
(E) wxwcwm nreA
4
(E) i0 'X, THE
nxE cEUfEUFNE«I
RE�iRLCOM
% vdMw)R2Gd
wEB:
mEi09En
AE R+ Nmus ossR
GALAXY
uwsa 2n 0, IRVINE ANc'.
NEw)OHI fI FACH. CA 92660
OR CHIEF III,Ery
ENLARGED SITE PLAN
0.tAwx 8Y 4vIEEHEO .,A, VE CAIE
vsx o mwlz
5HEE1 HUMBER
A -2
153
J
MAR-
111 LEVELUENErvI
R E A L C 0 M RICO
�4432 NE EAS HE III
¢LE(425) 2
TEL
fi 4RA
FAX FOCUS 4
wEB: vM
mPawAn a+
11PICANO
us ossR
ERIC INFORCIATINTO
RANC
GALAXY
L¢III' IRnrve AVE.
NEwPORI REACH U EA.A
.ANNCE COUNTO
CHIEF VILE
ELEVATIONS
ViAwx Bf 4vIEEREV Sy KNUE WE
NSx vo �-A
SHUT NUMVER
A -3
54
(P) vmrzON Wliuusr ONTO
ER� O Al
I
SCULL . O
\
-. O' DREW( R ezwcecxNlueA
aurzrvw c(rvTw Is
N) FRZ o: ^�
- -1
IDEA
oaeoaNll ES AND NpI PROPCHIPN
N
NAZI MCC LESS f NPUEErvIEN _
AS a PAR OF Ix6 appLIEAION,
DID IIIIEH U 1 1 PER)
-�
REV- 19 0' IS I -
-�
CAREIIII MIILEII I -III C Gw<VE arv_CS
�\
1.. i.U.o. V
-
UTURE ANLENNA RWENTER SEE rvmE 4
II) ALISON ERMS
IURTRE ANNOUNA CARPENTER (SEE NOTE a)
(q NAAAR CHRISTIAN
—.
wqT -F`M1S2
E w sE-E .1 1) a
1R110I DUhUHG
— _ - - - -- -y,y
'
b`A
015AG LIIRNG
P ([ RESIN CROPS
R
(P) LOPE OE
uLmalR,EO I eEE
(FIND
PU)M41)
I
PU..,) (VERYS
CHEY
n
1 ¢ f [ Pi -0 IN
(P) "'ION REIESS
WIWOR EO V GBNER
(P)'MOBIL91E C-C H SUSAN &UL
[CI ➢SURE Will AT COP HEADED TO
ARxrvV
PMx
Iwcx C
AN) CAUERH ¢I.arvc
ry C 01 LQ CURB
SOUTH —EAST ELEVATION
a. ()z ' 09 E EH L5 BRACCES
¢EV o cE l
'"-
INRA aurzrvw RAO C(rvT(R s
.
LL VASO RRE 1111
RxF G OPLreLoIXPCPSE0
FE
ANT ENNAS () ANTENNAS PER
oPVPAPUOreBrIuE ry rR(9s PIxINo o . o
S P PAR 0( Ix6 APPLM I O
—
)'
nrvIrNN4 J
E¢M ieO
...
uv(
C WIN RAS L
N 5pwavE FISH OEMI Ba11aN.
J� NrORE AATF CRFC ER (SEE NOTE 2)
- - - - --
PN" CENTER AND AZIMNIH IBO)
r EIN sr o- Ili .-----
-
l
Fi,.EVNNE EnoaM Ex (SEE NOR 2)
IaU
EAV .4 -1
(d rxusw rnw
J� Ev1URE aN1ErvW RnoesrvleR (seE rvmE z)
- - - -
:• W _
Y flN Sr o ACi------
HIRE. INS.
LI ❑ cxuttH FURIONG
LS ( IHIIIH BNImNB
Ea. (q cxxscH cross
mrv. :.' -o'z ACT
.G fln II
n. so' -FFY n I.
u u
(CA.RLE IRA.
P(LOGiEO
A[E
1
(Q CARVER BLOf
ANC IIIII
?f
O rry ICE., G AT Po¢ rzC
Ee. o' -o
RAN AV(NVA
RAVE MNJF
(E) CARE B OCN
(E) RLf.O CAeINR
(1) 11DSl w c (c s )�
Wu.l ENELCSORE
- IG. P W s
(q ILllNSNRMER
" MA91LUE 5 -O'(K BLOCN naW
IN'101IIRE . SNUCO BNIEP m
CATCH (A) ruuaH aVETLwNG
NORTH -EAST ELEVATION
MAR-
111 LEVELUENErvI
R E A L C 0 M RICO
�4432 NE EAS HE III
¢LE(425) 2
TEL
fi 4RA
FAX FOCUS 4
wEB: vM
mPawAn a+
11PICANO
us ossR
ERIC INFORCIATINTO
RANC
GALAXY
L¢III' IRnrve AVE.
NEwPORI REACH U EA.A
.ANNCE COUNTO
CHIEF VILE
ELEVATIONS
ViAwx Bf 4vIEEREV Sy KNUE WE
NSx vo �-A
SHUT NUMVER
A -3
54
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, February 12, 2013, at 7:00 p.m., a special
review will be conducted in the City Council Chambers (Building A) at 100 Civic Center Drive,
Newport Beach. The City Council of the City of Newport Beach will consider the following
application:
Mobilitie Telecommunications Facility Permit — The applicant requests a
Telecommunications (Telecom) Permit to install a 62 -foot high faux eucalyptus tree
(monopole). The proposal includes the installation of antennas and equipment for Verizon
Wireless. The design can accommodate three (3) additional carriers on the monopole, and
each of the additional carriers would be required to obtain approval prior to construction
pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 15.70 (Wireless Telecommunication Facilities).
The project is categorically exempt under Section 15303 of the California Environmental
Quality Act ( "CEQA ") Guidelines - Class 3 (New Construction), which exempts the
construction of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures and installation of small
new equipment and facilities in small structures.
No formal public hearing is be required in conjunction with review of this proposed telecom
facility. However, the City Council may hear and consider comments from the public during its
review of the application. All interested parties may appear and present testimony in regard to
this application. If you challenge this project in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the City Council meeting (described in this notice) or in
written correspondence delivered to the City, at or prior to, the review. The agenda, staff
report, and documents may be reviewed at the City Clerk's Office (Building B), 3300 Newport
Boulevard, Newport Beach, California, 92663, or at the City of Newport Beach website at
www.newportbeachca.gov on the Friday prior to the hearing. For more information please call
949 - 644 -3200.
For questions regarding details of the project please contact Fern Nueno, Associate Planner, at
(949) 644 -3227 or fnueno @newportbeachca.gov.
Project File No.: PA2010 -073
Zone: Private Institutions (PI)
Activity No.: TP2010 -010
General Plan: Private Institutions (PI)
Location: 2401 Irvine Avenue Applicant: Mobilitie
ah, - i Nk- -
Leilani Brown, 6ty Clerk
City of Newport Beach
v � i
On 2013, 1 posted _�- Site Notices of the Notice of
Public Hearing r garding:
Mobilitie Telecommunications Facility Permit
Location: 2401 Irvine Avenue
(PA2010 -073)
Date of City Council Public Hearing: February 12, 2013
.aay , m neno &
aeon nne w 1�1
Use Avery® Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-up Edger AVERY@ 51600 i
d
: tie
Attn: Christian Church
183 Rahe Gorginfar 2401 N. Lake Avenue HCA — N/A
18301 Von Karman, Suite 910
Irvine, CA 92612 Altadena, CA 91001
RealCom Associates LLC
Attn: Rahe Gorginfar
18301 Von Karman,, Suite 910
Irvine, CA 92612
Harbor Christian Church
Mobilitie
2401 N. Lake Avenue
Attn: Rahe Gorginfar
G've® el
Altadena, CA 91001
18301 Von Karman, Suite 910
�✓
Irvine, CA 92612
GOVOUNRy
Harbor Christian Church
flflobilitie
JAN 2 2013
2401 N. Lake Avenue
Attn: Rahe Gorginfar
18301 Von Karman, Suite 910
DE'JELOPMENT
Altadena, CA 91001
Irvine, CA 92612
Pcjr
2a 4X
O'. NEWPO¢"
Harbor Christian Church RealCom Associates LLC
2401 Irvine Avenue Attn: Rahe Gorginfar Labels completed 1/28/13
Newport Beach, CA 92660 18301 Von Karman, Suite 910
Irvine, CA 92612
Harbor Christian Church RealCom Associates LLC PA2010 -073 for TP2010 -010
2401 Irvine Avenue Attn: Rahe Gorginfar 2401 Irvine Avenue (Galaxy)
Newport Beach, CA 92660 18301 Von Karman, Suite 910
Irvine, CA 92612 CD 3 136 Labels
ttiquettes faciles a peler A Replies a la hachure afin de www.avery.com le gabarit AVERY® 5960® Sens de rdv6ler le rebord Po U TM 1- 800-GO -AVERY '
G chargement P• P d
1 119- 261 -19 2 119- 261 -20 3 119- 321 -26
CITY OF NE BEACH COUNTY OF ORANGE STEVE T & KUAN -YIH WUO
3300 N ORT BLVD PO BOX 4106 23 RIDGELINE DR
N ORT BEACH CA 92663 SANTA ANA CA 92702 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
4 119- 321 -27
DOUGLAS O FOSTER
2338 TUSTIN AVE
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
7 119- 321 -30
PAMELA K BEERUP
PO BOX 851
COLUMBIA MO 65205
10 439 -151 -17,19
EUGENE J & ELIZABETH Y TOTH
1731 LA LOMA DR
SANTA ANA CA 92705
14 439 - 151 -30
CRAIG BOARDMAN
21841 VIA DEL LAGO
TRABUCO CANYON CA 92679
17 439 - 151 -33
LESLIE H CHILLCOTT
387 SUNRISE CIR
COSTA MESA CA 92627
20 439 - 151 -36
DONALD FULLER
376 SUNRISE CIR
COSTA MESA CA 92627
23 439 - 151 -40
SUSAN L ALLISON
384 SUNRISE CIR
COSTA MESA CA 92627
26 439 - 151 -43
DOREY M THOMPSON
390 SUNRISE CIR
COSTA MESA CA 92627
0.S
5 119- 321 -28
PAULAISANTALA
2344 TUSTIN AVE
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
8 119 - 321 -31
LASCA I JACQUES
2341 IRVINE AVE
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
11 439 - 151 -18
IRVINE CO
550 NEWPORT CENTER DR
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
15 439 - 151 -31
DAVID A WEINBERGER
391 SUNRISE CIR
COSTA MESA CA 92627
18 439 - 151 -34
BENJAMIN LESLIE CRUMPACKER
385 SUNRISE CIR
COSTA MESA CA 92627
21 439 - 151 -37
EDWARD I MC KENNA
4224 VIA NIVEL
PALOS VERDES ESTA CA 90274
24 439 - 151 -41
JOHN P ROSSI
54 BOW ST
FOREST HILLS NY 11375
27 439 - 151 -44
FRANCES GIOIA
8242 BRUSH DR
HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647
6 119- 321 -29
RICHARD EDDY PARTNERS LLC
2353 IRVINE BLVD
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
9 439 - 151 -16
POMONA SERVICE CO
381 SUNRISE CIR
COSTA MESA CA 92627
13 439 - 151 -29
ROBERT C HIPOLITO
4326 OAKWOOD AVE
LA CANADA CA 91011
16 439 - 151 -32
KURT FUHRMANN
389 SUNRISE CIR
COSTA MESA CA 92627
19 439- 151 -35
MONICA RODE
383 SUNRISE CIR
COSTA MESA CA 92627
22 439 - 151 -38
SSD CAROUSEL PROPERTIES LLC
3315 FAIRVIEW RD
COSTA MESA CA 92626
25 439 - 151 -42
KEVIN HENDRICK
388 SUNRISE CIR
COSTA MESA CA 92627
28 439 - 151 -45
MARLENE E HASSEL
1136 SANTIAGO DR
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
29 439 -151 -65,66 30 439 - 152 -01 31 439 - 153 -01
BACK BAY VILLAGE OWNERS ASSN CHURCHES, CHRISTIAN OF SO CAL - SO MATTHEW T & KATHLEEN M PIPKIN
381 SUNRISECIR NEV 2401 BONNIEPL
COSTA MESA CA 92627 2401 IRVINE AVE COSTA MESA CA 92627
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
32 439 - 153 -02 33 439 - 153 -03
34 439- 153 -04
WILLIAM A BLAINE PARKER FAMILY TRUST MICHAEL & ROBIN A DRAGANZA
2405 BONNIE PL 2409 BONNIE PL 2415 BONNIE PL
COSTA MESA CA 92627 COSTA MESA CA 92627 COSTA MESA CA 92627
35 439 - 153 -05 36 439 - 153 -06 37 439- 153 -07
PARKS FAMILY TRUST CHRISTOPHER B & NANCY E ROHAN ROY SYMONDS
2421 BONNIE PL 2414 BONNIE PL 2408 BONNIE PL
COSTA MESA CA 92627 COSTA MESA CA 92627 COSTA MESA CA 92627
38 439 - 153 -08 39 439- 153 -09 40 439 - 153 -10
THEODORE J BISCHAK MANISTASTEPHANIE DONALD GLASCOCK
390 SANTA ISABEL AVE 2401 TUSTIN AVE 2405 TUSTIN AVE
COSTA MESA CA 92627 COSTA MESA CA 92627 COSTA MESA CA 92627
41 439 - 153 -11 42 439- 153 -12 43 439 153 D & PEGGY S HOYT ROBERT WEBB BURNS BACK BAY LAGE OWNERS ASSN
2409 TUSTIN AVE 2415 TUSTIN AVE 381 S SE CIR
COSTA MESA CA 92627 COSTA MESA CA 92627 CCgfA MESA CA 92627
44 439 - 153 -15 - 45 439 - 153 -16 46 439 - 154 -01
GREGORY RICHARD & JANE M SUSAN M REYNOLDS NIC CHURCH THOMAS J SR
CLAYTON 2420 BONNIE PL 2463 IRVINE AVE #F2
2421 TUSTIN AVE COSTA MESA CA 92627 COSTA MESA CA 92627
COSTA MESA CA 92627
47 439 - 154 -17 48 439- 154 -20 49 439 - 154 -21
NORTHBAY TOWNHOMES ASSN MOOKHERJEE REETABRATA THOMAS C WARLICH
7400 CENTER AVE #202 2459 IRVINE AVE 2455 IRVINE AVE
HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 COSTA MESA CA 92627 COSTA MESA CA 92627
50 439 - 154 -22 51 439 - 154 -25 52 439 - 232 -21
BARRY J MILES BACK BAY VILLAS HOMEOWNERS KENNETH ARNOLD RYDER
2457 IRVINE AVE ASSN - 379 SANTAISABELAVE
COSTA MESA CA 92627 2973 HARBOR BLVD #415 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
COSTA MESA CA 92626
53 439 - 232 -22 54 439- 232 -23 55 439 - 232 -24
DARRYL & TANYA TIVERON DORAN G MACHIN MARY JANE DRAGANZA
383 SANTA ISABEL AVE 815 MISSION AVE 9208 395 SANTA ISABEL AVE
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 OCEANSIDE CA 92054 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
56 439 - 232 -25 57 439 - 232 -26 58 439 - 232 -27
FRANK GREGORY ALCORN RODNEY EDGAR BROWN MAYRA URBIETA
2399 TUSTIN AVE 2397 TUSTIN AVE 2395 TUSTIN AVE
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
59 439- 232 -28 60 119 - 321 -25 61 119- 321 -32
RICHARD N WAGENSELLER SCOTT MARSHALL TURNER MADHULIKA BAID
2393 TUSTIN AVE 2326 TUSTIN AVE 2335 IRVINE AVE
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
62 119 - 321 -49 63 439 - 143 -01 64 439 - 143 -02
MICHAEL KANE JOHN & NANCY ELDRIDGE DIANE E MULLIN
2318 HEATHER LN 2426 LESPARRE WAY 2424 LESPARRE WAY
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 COSTA MESA CA 92627 COSTA MESA CA 92627
65 439 - 143 -03 66 439 - 143 -04 67 439 - 143 -05
JOSEPH TUCKER JOAN PANGLE ALAN JACOBSON
2422 LESPARRE WAY 2420 LESPARRE WAY 2416 LESPARRE WAY
COSTA MESA CA 92627 COSTA MESA CA 92627 COSTA MESA CA 92627
68 439 - 143 -06 69 439 - 143 -07 70 439 - 143 -58
BRUCE & ANNE MARIE COFFIN COSME L NORIEGA ANDREW & MADELINE WALBURGER
2414 LESPARRE WAY 2412 LESPARRE WAY 374 SANTA ISABEL AVE
COSTA MESA CA 92627 COSTA MESA CA 92627 COSTA MESA CA 92627
71 439 - 154 -02 72 439 - 154 -03 73 439- 154 -04
LILLIAN B BALLARD PAUL L ODETT JEANNE M FUNNELL
2463 IRVINE AVE Fl 2463 IRVINE AVE #E -4 2463 IRVINE AVE #E -3
COSTA MESA CA 92627 COSTA MESA CA 92627 COSTA MESA CA 92627
74 439 - 1.54 -05 75 439 - 154 -06 76 439- 154 -07
DENNIS W & SHIRLEE IDEN PHYLLIS ANN MARSHALL HERBERT B FROMMHOLZ
2463 IRVINE AVE #E-2 2463 IRVINEAVE #E] 741 WTAFTAVE
COSTA MESA CA 92627 COSTA MESA CA 92627 ORANGE CA 92865
77 439 - 154 -16 78 439- 154 -18 79 439 - 154 -19
MITRA TARR CHARLES & BABETTE LAVERTY ISABEL RODRIGUEZ
2463 IRVINE AVE #A1 220 CORAL AVE 2458 MONACO TER
COSTA MESA CA 92627 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92662 COSTA MESA CA 92627
80 439 - 154 -23 81 439 - 154 -24 - 82 439 - 232 -20
JOSEPH G NADDOUR BACK BAY VILLAS HOMEOWNERS ERNESTINE R HAGELE
2456 MONACO TERRACE ASSN 2392 REDLANDSDR
COSTA MESA CA 92627 2973 HA OR BLVD #415 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
C A MESA CA 92626
83 439 - 232 -29 84 439- 232 -40 85 439- 232 -41
JOHNSON W & JANET L RUSSELL ROBERT EARL SMITH JUSTIN D & CHELSEA D BRAVERMAN
174 SIDNEY BAY DR 372 NEWPORT GLEN CT 376 NEWPORT GLEN CT
NEWPORT COAST CA 92657 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
86 440 - 092 -71 87 440 -142- 05,06,14 88 440 - 161 -01
COUNTY RANGE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY OF NEWPO T BEACH
PO B 4106 PO BOX 187000 2555_Y ORO
SANTA ANA CA. 92702 SACRAMENTO CA 95818 N ORT BEACH CA 92660
89 440 - 221 -08 90 440 - 221 -09 91 440 - 221 -10
FREDERICK W HEARN MATTHEW J & KIM SPERR AMY L WALTERS
346 VISTA MADERA 342 VISTA MADERA 338 VISTA MADERA
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
92 440- 221 -11 93 440- 221 -12 94 440- 221 -13
SHOWCASE INVEST INC & INVEST INC DALE L DYKEMA GRANT ANTHONY GOULD
4636 VINETA AVE 1969 VISTA CAUDAL 2056 ROSE VILLA ST
LA. CANDA CA 91011 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PASADENA CA 91107
95 440 - 221 -14 96 440- 221 -15 97 440 - 221 -16
MICHAEL SU -YEN CHOU WILLIAM S STORY DIANNE P FELTS
320 VISTA MADERA 316 VISTA MADERA 312 VISTA MADERA
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
98 440 - 221 -26 100 440 - 271 -03 101 440- 271 -04
NORTH BLUFF BAY VIEW COMMUNITY JEAN MCINTOSH WILLIAM F SINCLAIR
ASSN 2403 VISTANOBLEZA 508 MARGUERITE AVE
1062 CALLE NEGOCIO # #F NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625
SAN CLEMENTE CA 92673
102 440 - 271 -05 103 440 - 271 -06 104 440 - 271 -07
JOHN SIMON IAN MAC DOUGALL HARPER MICHAEL HEATHER
2407 NOVIA 2409 NOVIA 240 S FELDNER RD
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 ORANGE CA 92868
105 440 - 271 -08 106 440 - 271 -09 107 440 - 271 -10
WALTER B RIDS LLOYD DELL JENKINS ANNE K HAYDEN
2415 NOVIA 2417 NOVIA 2419 VISTA NOBLEZA
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
108 440 - 271 -11 109 440 - 271 -12 110 440- 271 -13
SUN H CHOE GARRISON WILLIAMTR JAQUESS BAIRD R KENT
76 DISCOVERY 2423 VISTANOBLEZA 2425 VISTA NOBLEZA
IRVINE CA 92618 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
111 440 - 271 -14 112 440 - 271 -15 113 440- 271 -16
MARILYN A FREEMAN JOHN W REINER THOMAS V JOLICOEUR
2427 VISTANOBLEZA 2429 VISTANOBLEZA 2431 VISTANOBLEZA
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
114 440 - 271 -17 115 440 - 271 -18 116 440 - 271 -19
BRENT A PRAEGITZER MERLE G PAUTSC14 MICHAEL GRAY
2433 VISTA NOBLEZA 324 OAK HILL DR 221 NATA
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 LOMPOC CA 93436 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
117 440 - 271 -20 118 440 - 271 -21 119 440 - 271 -22
JOHN JOHNSON BRIAN C ROGERS XI YU JIA
219 NATA 217 NATA 215 NATA
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
120 440 - 271 -23 121 440 - 271 -24 122 440- 271 -25
SHIRLEY OBERSTEIN MARK L PIVAN LUCILLE A MONTOOTH
211 NATA 209 NATA 2946 QUEDADA
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
123 440 - 271 -26 124 440 - 271 -27 125 440 - 271 -28
RONALD J GORDON MARJORIE G LOUTHERBACK ELIZABETH D TARBELL
17145 VON KARMAN #105 203 NATA 201 NATA
IRVINE CA 92614 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
126 440- 271 -29
MARJORIE C LUESEBRINK
200 NATA
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
129 440 - 271 -32
ERIC R STICE
220 NATA
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
137 440 - 271 -40
LARRY TRUSLEY
2440 VISTA NOBLEZA
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
140 440 - 271 -43
PAUL C KING
PKWY #110 -211
LAS VEGAS NV 89141
143 440 - 271 -46
WILLIAM M MC DONALD
2402 VISTA NOBLEZA
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
GC MAPPING SERVICE INC NP
ATTN: GILBERT CASTRO
3055 W VALLEY BLVD
ALHAMBRA CA 91803
127 440 - 271 -30
TOBEY ROSEN
9 BADGER PASS
IRVINE CA 92604
130 440- 271 -33
LISA I SLIM
222 NATA
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
138 440 - 271 -41
CYNTHIA A & GEORGE BRADLEY
TERRY
2426 VISTA NOBLEZA
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
141 440 - 271 -44
JEFFREY J & JANET E WALLACE
2636 VISTA RIDGE DR
ORANGE CA 92867
440 -271 -4
SAME A 8
128 440 - 271 -31
SZAWLOWSKI LLC
21 CHERBOURG
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
131 440- 271 -34
LARRY R BIANCHI
224 NATA
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
139 440 - 271 -42
JUNE LOUISE SLACK
2424 VISTA NOBLEZA
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
142 440 - 271 -45
REBECCA L BILDER
2404 VISTA NOBLEZA
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
REPRESENTATIVE
JAMES ROGERS CONSULTING
ATTN: JAMES ROGERS
31097 VIA SONORA
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CA 92675
PROOF OF
PUBLICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I am a citizen of the United States and a
resident of the County of Los Angeles; I
am over the age of eighteen years, and
not a party to or interested in the notice
published. I am a principal clerk of the
NEWPORT BEACH /COSTA MESA
DAILY PILOT, which was adjudged a
newspaper of general circulation on
September 29, 1961, case A6214, and
June 11, 1963, case A24831, for the
City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange,
and the State of California. Attached to
this Affidavit is a true and complete copy
as was printed and published on the
following date(s):
Saturday, February 2, 2013
I certify (or declare) under penalty of
perjury that the foregoing is true and
correct.
Executed on February 5, 2013
at Los Angeles, California
" AJ`vvW`Vv
Signature
NOTICE OF SPECIAL REVIEW
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIV-
EN that on Tuesday,
February 12, 2013,. at
7;00 p.m., a special
review wdI be conducted
in the City Council
Chambers (Building A)
at 100 Civic Center
Drive, Newport Beach.
The City Council of the
City of Newport Beach
will consider the follow -
ing application'
III Telecom-
munications Facility
Permit - The applicant
requests a Telecom-
munications (Telecom)
Permit to install a 62-
foot high faux eucalyp-
tus tree (monopole).
The proposal includes
1he installation of an-
nnas and equipment
for Verizon .Wireless.
The design can accom-
modate three (3) addi-
tional carriers on the
monopole, and each of
the additional carriers
would 0 required to
obtain approval prior to
construction pursuant
to Municipal Code Chap-
ter 15.70 (Wireless Tele-
communication Facili-
ties).
The project is categori-
cally exempt under Sec-
tion 15303 of the Cali-
(New Construction),
which exempts the con-
struction of limited
numbers of new, small
facilities or structures
and installation of small
new equipment and fa-
cilities in small
nal public hearing
required in con-
, with review of
City Council may hear
and consider comments
from the public during
its review of the ap-
plication. All interested
parties may appear and
present testimony in re-
gard to this application.
If you challenge this
project in court, you
may be limited to rais-
ing only those issues
you at someone else
raised at the City Coun-
cil meeting (described in
this notice) or in written
correspondence deliv-
ered to the City, at or
prior to, the review. The
agenda, staff report,
and documents may be
reviewed at the City
Clerk's Office (Building
B), 3300 Newport Bou-
levard; Newport Beach,
California, 92663, or at
the City of Newport
.Beach webute at www.
newpoiheachm.gov on
the Friday prior to the
hearing. For more infor-
mation please call 949-
644- 3200.
For questions regarding
details of the project
please contact Fern
Nicene, Associate Plan-
ner, at (949) 644 -3227
or
fnueno Qa newport-
beach
co.gov.
Project File No.:
PA2010 073
Activity No.: TP2010-
010
Zane: Private Institu-
tions (PI)
General Plan: Private
Institutions (Pp
Location: 2401 Irvine
Avenue
Applicant: Mobilitie
/s/ Leilani Brown,
C
CZ
'7
iFr n
�
y
i 1 ri
C
S
;
co