Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/08/2013 - Study SessionCity Council Minutes Study Session October 8, 2013 — 5:00 p.m. I. ROLL CALL - 8:00 p.m. Present; Nancy Gardner, Tony Petros, Rush Hill, Keith Curry, Ed Selich, Mike Henn, Leslie Daigle II. CURRENT BUSINESS 1. CLARIFICATION OF ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR -None 2. UPDATES TO THE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE AS IT RELATES TO FIRE FEES. [100 -20131 Deputy Finance Director Montano utilized a PowerPoint presentation to discuss the goals of the proposed changes and consideration by Council on the final approval at the October 22, 2013 City Council meeting. He noted that non -fire fees will be changed based on the Consumer .Price Index (CPI) and that most fees will take effect after adoption, except for Planning and Development Fees which become effective 60 days after adoption. He highlighted the summary of the proposed fee schedule, alignment of revenues with direct and indirect costs for providing services to more accurately reflect the cost of service. He addressed fee categories along with the proposed changes and reported that there are no changes to emergency medical services due to pending regulatory changes at the State and Federal level. He indicated that this will be reviewed by Council when the regulatory changes take effect. Deputy Finance Director Montano discussed the fire fees' background, methodology for establishing the fees, calculation examples, and proposed changes per fee category. He noted that some fees have increased, some have decreased, some have no changes, and some have been eliminated. Discussion ensued regarding a tiered fee schedule for Safety, Planning and Development. Deputy Finance Director Montano reported on the categories and related fee changes. He indicated that fees were eliminated because of redundancy and combination with other fees. He provided examples for each category, the methodology used for calculations, and the resulting fee change. Discussion ensued regarding the removal of expedite requests as an additional fee and avoiding redundancy and duplicity related to personnel time for specific activities. Deputy Finance Director Montano reported that the Finance Committee reviewed the proposed fee schedule and that the proposed changes are inclusive of their recommendations. In response to Council Member Petros' questions, Deputy Finance Director Montano reported that the budget is reflective of the revenues obtained through fees for service and noted that the total budget for the Fire Department is $37 million for 201312014. Revenue from fees for service for the fiscal year ending in June 2013, was $1.3 million, equaling 3.7% of operating costs. He noted that all other Fire Department operations are tax supported. Mayor Pro Tom Hill requested that the October 22 2013 staff report include detailed line items with corresponding amounts. Jim Mosher discussed the difference between services paid through taxes and those paid through fees for special services requested by residents. He referenced Exhibit A of the staff report and commented on fees charged for fire services and/or ambulance services. He requested clarification of Volume 61 - Page 305 City of Newport Beach City Council Study Session October 8, 2013 III. basic services that are provided out of tax levies. Victor Cao, representing the Building Industry Association (BIA), thanked Assistant Fire Chief Kitch and staff. He expressed concerns regarding comparisons used in the analysis with the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) and suggested using municipal fire departments instead. He indicated that the BIA wants to ensure that the public is [not] receiving redundancy in the bureaucracy and [is receiving] adequate services. Further, the BIA wants to focus on the customer service experience and that their overarching message is they want to support more opportunity for economic freedom in order to create jobs and housing. City Manager Kiff reported that Mr. Cao's presentation will be made available to the public. Jim Mosher noted that Council is about to enter into labor negotiations with 10 different bargaining groups. He noted that the same matter was on several previous meeting agendas and believed that Council owes it to the public to provide a clear explanation about the issues. Additionally, he discussed the City Attorney's job performance review and believed that City Attorney Harp has a tendency to tell Council what it wants to hear rather than what it should hear. He referenced an article in the Daily Pilot regarding a letter he sent to the City Clerk questioning the propriety of two Council Members on the Finance Committee jointly publishing a comment regarding the financial advantages of trash outsourcing, believing that the City Attorney took it upon himself not to respond to his letter as it would have required a notice of public meeting. He added that the Brown Act does not allow a majority to discuss their committee's issues except at a noticed public meeting. City Attorney Harp reported that Council will adjourn into Closed Session to discuss the items listed under Closed Session in the regular agenda. IV. ADJOURNMENT -Adjourned to Closed Session at 5:34 p.m. The agenda for the Study Session was posted on October 3, 2013, at 4:00 p.m. on the City's website, on the City Hall Electronic Bulletin Board located in the entrance of the City Council Chambers at 100 Civic Center Drive, and in the Meeting Agenda Binder located in the entrance of the City Council Chambers at 100 Civic Center Drive. 22 j�Rw� --� &" City Clerk Volume 61- Page 3