Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2013-76 - Adopting Mitigated Negative Declaration No. ND2013-001 for the Lido Villas Project Located at 3303 and 3355 Via Lido (PA2012-146)
RESOLUTION NO. 2013-76 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ADOPTING MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. ND2013-001 FOR THE LIDO VILLAS PROJECT LOCATED AT 3303 AND 3355 VIA LIDO (PA2012-146) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FACTS. 1. An application was filed by DART Development Group, with respect to property located at 3303 and 3355 Via Lido, and legally described as Lots 1201 to 1204 together with that portion of the adjoining alley of Tract 907, as shown on the map recorded in Book 28, Pages 25 to 36, inclusive, of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, California, together with that portion of Lots 4 and 5 of Tract 1117, in the City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as shown on a map recorded in Book 35, Page 48 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, California, together with a portion of the 20 foot alley adjoining said Lots 4 and 5 as abandoned by resolution of the City Council of Newport Beach on February 4, 1946, a certified copy of said resolution being recorded March 11, 1946 in Book 1400, Page 149 of Official Records, requesting adoption of a mitigated negative declaration and approval of a General Plan amendment (GPA), Coastal Land Use Plan (CLUP) amendment, Zoning Code amendment, site development review, and tentative tract map. 2. The proposed project consists of the demolition of a 3 -story commercial building, a single -story church building (First Church of Christ, Scientist), and a 56 -space surface parking lot to accommodate the development of 23 townhouse -style multi- family condominium units on a combined 1.2 acre site. A site development review and tentative tract map are required to allow the development of the 23 unit condominium project on the project site. 3. The General Plan Land Use Element category of the subject property at 3303 Via Lido is Private Institutions (PI, 0.75 FAR). The General Plan Land Use Element category of the subject property at 3355 Via Lido is Multiple -Unit Residential (RM, 20 du/ac). 4. The requested change of the General Plan designation of 3303 Via Lido is from Private institutions (Pi, 0.75 FAR) to Multiple -Unit Residential (RM, 20 du/ac) (General Plan Amendment No. GP2012-005). 5. The subject property is located within the coastal zone. The Coastal Land Use Plan category of 3303 Via Lido is Private Institutions (PI -B) and the Coastal Land Use Plan category of 3355 Via Lido is Multiple -Unit Residential (RM -D). 6. The requested change to the Coastal Land Use category is consistent with the General Plan Amendment for 3303 Via Lido from Private Institutions (PI -B) to Multiple - Unit Residential (RM -D), Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment No. LC2013-001. The CLUP amendment will not become effective until the amendment to the Coastal Land Use Plan is approved by the Coastal Commission. 7. The Zoning designation of 3303 Via Lido is Private Institutions (PI, 0.75 FAR) and the Zoning designation of 3355 Via Lido is Multi -Unit Residential (RM, 2178). 8. The requested change of the Zoning District designations for both portions of the project site are to the PC -Planned Community Zoning District (Zoning Code Amendment No. CA2012-008). The application includes the adoption of the Lido Villas Planned Community that will provide land use and development standards for the construction and operation of a 23 -unit condominium development. A waiver of the 10 acre (developed) minimum site area is requested as part of the establishment of the PC Zoning District. The resulting density under the PC Zoning District would be equivalent to the density allowed under the RM (2178) designation and would allow for a maximum of 23 dwelling units on-site (20 dwelling units per acre). 9. The Planning Commission considered a staff report on the application on August 22, 2013, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and purpose of the meeting was given in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code. The Planning Commission continued the item to the September 5, 2013, Planning Commission Meeting. 10. A public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on September 5, 2013, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and purpose of the meeting was given in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the Planning Commission at this meeting. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted (7 ayes and 0 noes) to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 1921 recommending City Council adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approval of the Lido Villas project consisting of a General Plan Amendment, Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment, Zoning Code Amendment, Site Development Review, and Tentative Tract Map. 11. A public hearing was held by the City Council on November 12, 2013, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and purpose of the meeting was given in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the City Council at this hearing. SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DETERMINATION. 1. An Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration have been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and City Council Policy K-3. 2. The draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for a 30 -day comment period beginning on July 12, 2013, and ending on August 13, 2013. The environmental document and comments on the document were considered by the City Council in its review of the proposed project. 3. The Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program are attached as Exhibits "A" and "B", respectively. The documents and all material, which constitute the record upon which this decision was based, are on file with the Planning Division, City Hall, 100 *Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. 4. On the basis of the entire environmental review record, the proposed project, with mitigation measures, will have a less than significant impact upon the environment and there are no known substantial adverse affects on human beings that would be caused. Additionally, there are no long-term environmental goals that would be compromised by the project, nor cumulative impacts anticipated in connection with the project. The mitigation measures identified by the Mitigated Negative Declaration and incorporated in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program are feasible and will reduce potential environmental impacts to a less than significant level. 5. The City Council finds that judicial challenges to the City's CEQA determinations and approvals of land use projects are costly and time consuming. In addition, project opponents often seek an award of attorneys' fees in such challenges. As project applicants are the primary beneficiaries of such approvals, it is appropriate that such applicants should bear the expense of defending against any such judicial challenge, and bear the responsibility for any costs, attorneys' fees, and damages which may be awarded to a successful challenger. Therefore, to the fullest extent permitted by law, applicant and property owner shalt defend, indemnify, release and hold harmless the City, its City Council, its boards and commissions, officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses (including without limitation, attorney's fees, disbursements and court costs) of every kind and nature whatsoever which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to the project, the project's approval based on the City's CEQA determination and/or the City's failure to comply with the requirements of any federal, state, or local laws, including, but not limited to, CEQA, General Plan and zoning requirements. This indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, damages awarded against the City, if any, costs of suit, attorneys' fees, and other expenses incurred in connection with such claim, action, or proceeding whether incurred by applicant, City, and/or the parties initiating or bringing such proceeding. SECTION 4. DECISION. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach, California, hereby resolves as follows: 1. The City Council of the City of Newport Beach hereby adopts Mitigated Negative Declaration No. ND2013-001 as depicted in Exhibit "A" and the Mitigation Monitoring Program as depicted in Exhibit `B", which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Passed and adopted by the City Council of Newport Beach at a regular meeting held on the 12�h day of November, 2013. ATTEST: Keith D. Curry, Mayor aw 113 Eeiiani 1. Brown, City Clerk Exhibit "A" Mitigated Negative Declaration MND SCH No. 2010071050 Exhibit "A" Mitigated Negative Declaration MND SCH No. 2010071050 This document is available at: htto://www,newi)ortbeachca, aov/index.asr)x?page=1347 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION for the Lido Willas Residential Development General Plan Amendment No. GP2012-005 Zoning Code Amendment No. CA2012-008 Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment No. LC2013-001 Site Development Review No. SD2013-001 Tract Map No. NT2013-001 (PA2012-146) Lead Agencv Contact: Makana Nova City of Newport Beach Community Development Department Planning Division 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, California 92660 CEQA Consultant T&B Planning, Inc. 17542 East 17" Street, Suite 100 Tustin, California 92780 DRAFT: July 12, 2013 Declaration TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Number/Title Page 1.0 Introduction..................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Document Purpose......................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Location............................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Project Summary ..............................................................................................................................I-2 1.4 California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)........................................................................ 1-2 1.4.1 CEQA Objectives............................................................................................................. 1-2 1.4.2 CEQA Requirements for Mitigated Negative Declarations (MNDs)................... 1-3 1.4.3 Initial Study Findings......................................................................................................... 1-3 1.4.4 CEQA Requirements for Environmental Setting and Baseline Conditions........ 1-3 1.4.5 Format and Content of this Mitigated Negative Declaration ................................ 1-4 1.4.6 Preparation and Processing of this Mitigated Negative Declaration .................... 1-5 2.0 Environmental Setting....................................................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Project Location...............................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Existing Site and Area Characteristics........................................................................................ 2-1 2.2.1 Site Access..........................................................................................................................2-1 2.2.2 Existing Site Conditions..................................................................................................2-1 2.2.3 Site Topography................................................................................................................2-1 2.2.4 Surrounding Land Uses and Development.................................................................2-5 2.3 Planning Context.............................................................................................................................2-5 2.3.1 On -Site General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan, and Zoning Designations ........... 2-5 2.3.2 Surrounding General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan, and Zoning Designations ... 2-9 2.3.3 Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport......................................2-9 2.4 Existing Environmental Characteristics...................................................................................... 2-9 2.4.1 Geology...............................................................................................................................2-9 2.4.2 Hydrology .............................................. ........................................................................... 2-11 2.4.3 Vegetation & Wildlife.....................................................................................................2-1 1 2.4.4 Historical, Archaeological, and Paleontological Resources .................................. 2-11 2.4.5 Mineral Resources..........................................................................................................2-11 2.4.6 Agricultural Resources..................................................................................................2-11 2.4.7 Rare and Unique Resources.........................................................................................2-1 1 3.0 Project Description........................................................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Proposed Discretionary Approvals............................................................................................. 3-1 3.1.1 General Plan Amendment No. GP2012-005..............................................................3-1 3.1.2 Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment No. LC2013-001............................................ 3-1 3.1.3 Zoning Code Amendment No. CA2012-008............................................................ 3-3 3.1.4 Site Development Review No. SD2013-001.............................................................. 3-7 3.1.5 Tentative Tract Map No. 17555 (NT2013-001).....................................................3-15 3.1.6 Approvals Required from Other Agencies...............................................................3-15 3.2 Project Technical Characteristics ............................... ...............................................................3-15 3.2.1 Demolition.......................................................................................................................3-15 3.2.2 Anticipated Construction Schedule............................................................................3-18 3.2.3 Construction Equipment...............................................................................................3-18 3.2.4 Construction Employees...............................................................................................3-18 3.2.5 Off -Site Improvements..................................................................................................3-18 3.2.6 Future Population...........................................................................................................3-19 4.0 Project Information ............................................... ......................................................................................... 4-1 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Analysis........................................................................... 5-1 Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page ii Declaration Section Number/Title TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 5.1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected..............................................................................5-1 5.2 Determination (To Be Completed By the Lead Agency)....................................................... 5-1 5.3 City of Newport Beach Environmental Checklist Summary ................................................. 5-2 5.4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts........................................................................................5-11 5.4.1 Aesthetics.........................................................................................................................5-11 5.4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources..........................................................................5-23 5.4.3 Air Quality........................................................................................................................5-25 5.4.4 Biological Resources......................................................................................................5-36 5.4.5 Cultural Resources.........................................................................................................5-40 5.4.6 Geology and Soils...........................................................................................................5-44 5.4.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions..........................................................................................5-50 5.4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials..............................................................................5-55 5.4.9 Hydrology and Water Quality.....................................................................................5-64 5.4.10 Land Use and Planning...................................................................................................5-73 5.4.1 1 Mineral Resources..........................................................................................................5-88 5.4.12 Noise.................................................................................................................................5-89 5.4.13 Population and Housing................................................................................................5-93 5.4.14 Public Services .................... ............................................ ................................................. 5-94 5.4.15 Recreation........................................................................................................................5-99 5.4.16 Transportation/Traffic.................................................................................................5-103 5.4.17 Utilities and Service Systems......................................................................................5-1 1 1 5.4.18 Mandatory Findings of Significance...........................................................................5-1 16 6.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program........................................................................................ 6-1 7.0 References........................................................................................................................................................7-1 8.0 Persons Contributing to IS/MND Preparation ............................................... ......................................... 8-1 8.1 Persons Contributing to Initial Study/Addendum Preparation .............................................8-1 8.2 Resumes for Key Personnel..........................................................................................................8-1 Lido Villas Residential Development Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach July 12, 2013 Page iii Declaration LIST OF TECHNICAL APPENDICES The various reports identified below are included within the Technical Appendices to this MND, and are herein incorporated by reference pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15150. Aooendix No. Appendix Descriotion A. Via Lido Project Focused Construction Air Quality Analysis B. Geotechnical Engineering Services Report C. Hydrology Report D. Conceptual Priority Water Quality Management Plan El. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment E2. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment E3. Asbestos and Lead Report for 3355 Via Lido E4. Asbestos and Lead Report for 3303 Via Lido F. Miscellaneous Correspondence G. Preliminary Sewer Analysis Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page iv Declaration LIST OF FIGURES Fiaure Number/Title Paae Figure 2-1 Regional Location Map .......... ....,.....,.............................................................................................. 2-2 Figure2-2 Vicinity Map.......................................................................................................................................2-3 Figure2-3 Aerial Photograph............................................................................................................................2-4 Figure 2-4 Existing and Surrounding Land Uses...........................................................................................2-6 Figure 2-5 Existing General Plan Land Use Designations...........................................................................2-7 Figure 2-6 Existing Coastal Land Use Plan Designations............................................................................2-8 Figure 2-7 Existing Zoning Designations......................................................................................................2-10 Figure 3-1 General Plan Amendment No. GP2012-005.............................................................................3-2 Figure 3-2 Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment No. 2013-001................................................................. 3-4 Figure 3-3 Zoning Code Amendment No. CA2012-008........................................................................... 3-5 Figure3-4 Proposed Site Plan...........................................................................................................................3-6 Figure 3-5 Preliminary Grading Plan................................................................................................................3-9 Figure3-6 Building Elevations.........................................................................................................................3-10 Figure 3-7 Landscape Site Plan........................................................................................................................3-12 Figure 3-8 Landscape Planting Plan................................................................................................................3-13 Figure 3-9 Open Space Calculations.............................................................................................................3-14 Figure 3-10 Tract Map No. 17555 (Sheet I of 2).........................................................................................3-16 Figure 3-11 Tract Map No. 17555 (Sheet 2 of 2).........................................................................................3-17 Figure5-1 Site Photos Key Map.....................................................................................................................5-12 Figure 5-2 Site Photos I through 3...............................................................................................................5-13 Figure 5-3 Site Photos 4 through 6...............................................................................................................5-14 Figure 5-4 General Plan Coastal Views Map...............................................................................................5-16 Figure 5-5 Photos from Lido Island Bridge ......................... .......................................... ............................... 5-17 Figure 5-6 Lido Villas Architectural Rendering...........................................................................................5-21 Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page v Declaration LIST OF TABLES Table Number/Title Page Table 3-1 Construction Equipment by Construction Phase..................................................................3-18 Table 5-1 Attainment Status of Criteria Pollutants in the SCAB..........................................................5-27 Table 5-2 SCAQMD Regional Significance Thresholds...........................................................................5-29 Table 5-3 SCAQMD Localized Significance Thresholds (Screening Level Analysis) ........................5-29 Table 5-4 Overall Construction Emissions — Before Mitigation............................................................5-32 Table 5-5 Overall Construction Emissions — With Mitigation..............................................................5-32 Table 5-6 Localized Significance Summary for Construction (Without Mitigation).........................5-34 Table 5-7 Localized Significance Summary for Construction (With Mitigation)...............................5-34 Table 5-8 Existing and Proposed GHG Emission Sources......................................................................5-53 Table 5-9 Existing Site Daily Traffic...........................................................................................................5-106 Table 5-10 Comparison of Existing versus Proposed Daily Traffic......................................................5-106 Table 5-11 Existing and Proposed Wastewater Treatment Demand .................................................. 5-1 14 Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page vi No 0❑ Mitigated Negative Declaration LIST OF ACRONYMS Acronym Definition AB Assembly Bill ACCM Asbestos -Containing Construction Material ACM Asbestos -Containing Material ACWM Asbestos -Containing Waste Material ADT Average Daily Vehicle Trips AELUP Airport Environs Land Use Plan ALUC Airport Land Use Commission amsl above mean sea level AQMP Air Quality Management Plan APN Assessor's Parcel Number BMPs Best Management Practices Btu British Thermal Unit CA2012-008 Zoning Code Amendment No. CA2012-008 CARB California Air Resources Board CBC California Building Code CCC California Coastal Commission CCR California Code of Regulations CDC California Department of Conservation CDE California Department of Education CDP Coastal Development Permit CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife CDPH California Department of Public Health CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations CG General Commercial (General Plan land use designation) CG -13 General Commercial (Coastal Land Use Plan land use designation) CGS California Geological Survey CHa Methane CM Recreational and Marine Commercial (General Plan land use designation) CM -A Recreational and Marine Commercial (Coastal Land Use Plan land use designation) CMP Congestion Management Program CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level CO2 Carbon Dioxide CO2e Carbon Dioxide Equivalents CPSC Consumer Product Safety Commission CWA Clean Water Act dB Decibels dBA A -weighted Decibels DOSH Department of Occupational Safety and Health du dwelling units du/ac dwelling units per acre Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page vii Acronym Declaration Definition LIST OF ACRONYMS EIR Environmental Impact Report EMP Emergency Management Plan emp. employees EMS Emergency Medical Services EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESA Environmental Study Area or Environmental Site Assessment FAA Federal Aviation Administration FAR Federal Aviation Regulations or Floor Area Ratio FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FMMP Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program GHG Greenhouse Gas(es) GP2012-005 General Plan Amendment No. GP 2012-005 GPA General Plan Amendment gpd gallons per day gpm gallons per minute GWP Global Warming Potential HCP Habitat Conservation Plan HFC Hydrofluorocarbon HUD Housing and Urban Development Agency JWA John Wayne Airport LBP Lead -Based Paint LBPPPA Lead -Based Paint Poison Prevention Act LC2013-001 Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment No. LC2013-001 LCP Local Coastal Program Leq Equivalent Level (noise) LOS Level of Service LST Localized Significance Thresholds MMRP Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MND Mitigated Negative Declaration MRZ Mineral Resources Zone MRZ-1 Mineral Resources Zone I MU -V Mixed -Use Vertical MU -W Mixed -Use Water N20 Nitrous Oxide NAHC Native American Heritage Commission NBFD Newport Beach Fire Department NBPD Newport Beach Police Department NBPL Newport Beach Public Library NCCP Natural Community Conservation Plan Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page viii Acronym NESHAP NMUSD NOx NOD NOI NOP NPDES NT2013-001 Declaration LIST OF ACRONYMS Definition National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants Newport -Mesa Unified School District Oxides of Nitrogen Notice of Determination Notice of Intent Notice of Preparation National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Tentative Tract Map No. 17555 OCALUC Orange County Airport Land Use Commission OCSD Orange County Sanitation District OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority OCWD Orange County Water District OHP Office of Historic Preservation PB&R Parks, Beaches and Recreation PC Planned Community Zoning District PCDP Planned Community Development Plan PF Public Facilities PFC Perfluorocarbons PI Private Institutions (General Plan land use designation) PI -B Private Institutions (Coastal Land Use Plan land use designation) PM2.5 Fine Particulate Matter PMio Inhalable Particulate Matter P.O. Post Office pph person(s) per household psi pounds per square inch RECs Recognized Environmental Conditions RM Multiple Unit Residential (General Plan land use designation) RM -D Multiple Unit Residential (Coastal Land Use Plan land use designation) RSC Retail Service Commercial RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board SB Senate Bill SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SCH State Clearinghouse (Governor's Office of Planning & Research) s.f. square feet or square foot SFe Sulfur Hexafluoride SOA Sprayed -On -Acoustic SOI Sphere of Influence SR -I State Route I/Pacific Coast Highway SR -55 State Route 55 SRA Source Receptor Area SWPPP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page ix Acronym TDSD Declaration LIST OF ACRONYMS Definition Newport Beach Transportation and Development Services Division U.S.C. United States Code USCB United States Census Bureau USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service UWMP Urban Water Management Plan v/c Volume to Capacity Ratio VOCs Volatile Organic Compounds WQMP Water Quality Management Plan yr year Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page x Declaration 1.0 Introduction 1.0 Introduction The City of Newport Beach (hereafter "City") received applications from the Dart Development Group (hereafter "Project Applicant") for the development of 23 townhouses on an approximately 1.2 -acre site. The subject property (hereafter, "proposed Project site" or "Project site") is bounded by the following roadways: Via Lido to the east/northeast, Via Oporto to the west, and Via Malaga to the south. Specifically, the Project Applicant submitted applications for General Plan Amendment No. GP2012-005, Zoning Code Amendment No. CA2012-008, Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment No. LC2013-001, Site Development Review No. SD2013-001, and Tract Map No. 17555 (NT2013-001), collectively referred to by the City as (PA2012-146) and which are described in more detail below. These applications (hereafter "Project" or "proposed Project") would involve the demolition of an existing office building, church building, church reading room and their associated site improvements, clearing them from the property, and redevelopment of the site with 23 townhouses in five (5) clusters along with landscaping, drive aisles, and associated parking. The proposed Project is the subject of analysis in this document pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15367, the City is the lead agency with principal responsibility for considering the proposed Project for approval. 1.1 Document Purpose This document is a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), including all criteria, standards, and procedures of CEQA (California Public Resource Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Section 15000 et seq.). This MND is an informational document intended for use by the City of Newport Beach, Trustee and Responsible agencies, and members of the general public in evaluating the physical environmental effects of the proposed Project. This MND was compiled by the City of Newport Beach, serving as the Lead Agency for the proposed Project pursuant to CEQA §21067 and CEQA Guidelines Article 4 and §15367. "Lead Agency" refers to the public agency that has the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a project. This introduction is included to provide the reader with general information regarding: 1) the location of the proposed Project and a summary of the Project's proposed discretionary actions; 2) standards of adequacy for a MND under CEQA; 3) a summary of Initial Study findings supporting the Lead Agency's decision to prepare a MND for the proposed Project; 4) a description of the format and content of this MND; and 5) the governmental processing requirements to consider the proposed Project for approval. 1.2 Project Location The proposed Project site comprises approximately 1.2 acres, located in the City of Newport Beach, Orange County, California in the northerly section of the Balboa Peninsula. The Pacific Ocean is located approximately 0.3 miles to the west of the property and Newport Bay is located approximately 165 feet to the east. Specifically, the subject property is bounded by Via Lido to the east, Via Oporto to the west, and Via Malaga to the south. The current address of the site is 3303 Via Lido and 3355 Via Lido, Newport Beach, California 92663-3979. The assessor's parcel numbers (APNs) are 423-112-02 and 423-112-03. The site was previously subdivided and encompasses a total of six (6) existing lots: Lots 1201, 1202, 1203, and 1204 of Tract 907 (inclusive of an adjacent alley) and a portion of Lots 4 and 5 of Tract 1 117 (inclusive of an adjacent alley). Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 1-1 Declaration 1.3 Prolect Summary 1.0 Introduction The proposed Project evaluated in this MND is located in the City's Lido Village Subarea (Statistical Area 135) of the City's General Plan. The proposed Project consists of applications for a General Plan Amendment (GP2012-005), Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment (LC2013-001), Zoning Code Amendment (CA2012-008), Site Development Permit (SD2013-001), and Tract Map (NT2013-001) to allow for the demolition and removal of an existing office building, church building, church reading room, and associated site improvements and redevelopment of the property by the construction of 23 new townhouse -style condominiums in five (5) clusters along with landscaping, drive aisles, and associated parking. Provided below is a brief description of the Project's proposed discretionary applications under consideration by the City of Newport Beach. Refer to Section 3.0 of this document for a more complete description of the proposed Project. The following applications require consideration by the Newport Beach Planning Commission, which would make recommendations regarding the Project to the City Council. The Newport Beach City Council would then consider these discretionary applications for approval, approval with modification, or denial. If the Project is approved by the City Council, the Project's Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment would then require review by the California Coastal Commission (CCC). If the Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment is approved by the CCC, then the Project would require a Coastal Development Permit (CDP), which also would be issued by the CCC. A CDP is required because the site is located in the coastal zone and subject to the California Coastal Act of 1976. • General Plan Amendment No. GP2012-005 proposes to change the existing land use designation of APN 423-112-02 (3303 Via Lido; herein, "Parcel A") from "Private Institutions (PI)" to "Multiple Unit Residential (RM)." GP2012-005 would not affect the existing General Plan land use designation of "Multiple Unit Residential (RM)" for APN 423-112-03 (3355 Via Lido; herein, "Parcel B"). • Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment No. LC2013-00 I proposes to change the existing Coastal Land Use Plan designation of Parcel A from "Private Institutions (PI -B)" to "Multiple Unit Residential (RM -D)." LC2013-001 would not affect the existing Coastal Land Use Plan designation of "Multiple Residential (RM -D)" for Parcel B. • Zoning Code Amendment No. CA2012-008 proposes to change the zoning designations for the entire 1.2 -acre Project site. Specifically, Parcel A would be rezoned from "PI (Private Institutions)" to "PC (Planned Community District)" and Parcel B would be rezoned from "RM (Multi -Unit Residential)" to "PC (Planned Community District)." CA2012-008 also would establish standards for development of the property with 23 townhouses. • Site Development Review No. SD2013-001 is required pursuant to § 20.52.080 (Site Development Reviews) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code because the Project involves a tentative map and proposes more than five dwelling units. • Tract Map No. 17555 (NT2013-001) proposes to combine the site's existing six parcels into one parcel and establish a 23 -unit condominium tract. 1.4 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQAj 1.4.1 CEQA Objectives CEQA is a statewide environmental law contained in Public Resources Code §§ 21000-21177 that applies to most public agency decisions to carry out, authorize, or approve actions that have the potential to adversely affect the environment. The overarching goal of CEQA is to protect the physical environment. To achieve that goal, CEQA requires that public agencies inform themselves of the environmental consequences of their discretionary actions and consider alternatives and mitigation Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 1-2 Declaration 1.0 Introduction measures that could avoid or reduce significant adverse impacts when avoidance or reduction is feasible. It also gives other public agencies and the general public an opportunity to comment on the information. If significant adverse impacts cannot be avoided, reduced, or mitigated to below a level of significance, the public agency is required to prepare an EIR and balance the project's environmental concerns with other goals and benefits in a statement of overriding considerations. The principal objectives of CEQA are to: 1) inform governmental decision makers and the public about the potential, significant environmental effects of proposed activities; 2) identify the ways that environmental damage can be avoided or significantly reduced; 3) prevent significant, avoidable damage to the environment by requiring changes in projects through the use of alternatives or mitigation measures when the governmental agency finds the changes to be feasible; and 4) disclose to the public the reasons why a governmental agency approved the project in the manner the agency chose if significant environmental effects are involved. 1.4.2 CEQA Requirements for Mitigated Negative Declarations (MNDs) A MND is a written statement by the Lead Agency briefly describing the reasons a proposed project, which is not exempt from the requirements of CEQA, will not have a significant effect on the environment and therefore does not require preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). (CEQA Guidelines § 15371) The CEQA Guidelines require the preparation of a MND if the Initial Study prepared for a project identifies potentially significant effects, but: 1) revisions in the project plans or proposals made by, or agreed to by the applicant before a proposed MND and Initial Study are released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur; and 2) there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the Lead Agency, that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If the potentially significant effects associated with a project cannot be mitigated to a level below significance, then an EIR must be prepared. (CEQA Guidelines § 15070[b]) 1.4.3 Initial Study Findings Section 5.0, Environmental Checklist and Environmental Analysis, contains a copy of the Initial Study that was prepared for the proposed Project pursuant to CEQA and City of Newport Beach requirements. The Initial Study determined that implementation of the proposed Project would result in no impacts or less than significant environmental effects under the issue areas of aesthetics, agriculture/forest resources, biological resources, geology/soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hydrology/water quality, land use/planning, mineral resources, noise, population/housing, public services, recreation, transportation/traffic or utilities/service systems. The Initial Study determined that the proposed Project would result in potentially significant effects to the following issue areas, but the applicant has agreed to incorporate mitigation measures that would avoid or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur: air quality, cultural resources, and hazards/hazardous materials. The Initial Study also determined that, with the incorporation of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the Lead Agency (City of Newport Beach), that the Project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, and based on the findings of the Initial Study, the City of Newport Beach determined that a MND shall be prepared for the proposed Project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15070(b). 1.4.4 CEQA Requirements for Environmental Setting and Baseline Conditions CEQA Guidelines § 15125 establishes requirements for defining the environmental setting to which the environmental effects of a proposed project must be compared. The environmental setting is defined as '...the physical environmental conditions in the vicinity of the project, as they exist at the time the notice of preparation is published, or if no notice of preparation is published, at the time the Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 1-3 Declaration 1.0 Introduction environmental analysis is commenced..." (CEQA Guidelines § 15125[a]) In the case of the proposed Project, the Initial Study determined that a MND is the appropriate form of CEQA compliance document, which does not require a Notice of Preparation (NOP). Thus, the environmental setting for the proposed Project is the approximate date that the Project's environmental analysis commenced. The City of Newport Beach commenced environmental review of the proposed Project in early 2013. Accordingly, the environmental setting for the proposed Project is defined as the physical environmental conditions on the proposed Project site and in the vicinity of the proposed Project as they existed in early 2013. Section 2.0, Environmental Setting, provides a summary of the existing physical environmental conditions of the Project site and surrounding areas as they existed in early 2013. 1.4.5 Format and Content of this Mitigated Negative Declaration The following components comprise the MND in its entirety: 1) This document, including all Sections. Section 5.0 contains the completed Environmental Checklist/initial Study and its associated analyses which document the reasons to support the findings and conclusions of the Initial Study. 2) The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), which summarizes all mitigation measures imposed on the proposed Project to ensure that effects to the environment are reduced to less -than -significant levels. The basis for the MMRP is found in the Environmental Checklist/Initial Study. The MMRP also indicates the required timing for the implementation of each mitigation measure, identifies the parties responsible for implementing and/or monitoring each mitigation measure, and identifies the level of significance following the incorporation of each mitigation measure.; and 3) Eight (8) technical reports that evaluate the effects of the proposed Project, which are attached as Technical Appendices A through E4. The analysis herein also relies on correspondence from other City Departments and the Project applicant; this correspondence is provided in Technical Appendix F. These technical reports and miscellaneous correspondence also are on file and available for public review at the City of Newport Beach Community Development Department, Planning Division (100 Civic Center Drive; Newport Beach, California 92660) and are hereby incorporated by reference pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15150. A. Via Lido Project Focused Construction Air Quality Analysis, prepared by Urban Crossroads, Inc., and dated May 21, 2013; B. Geotechnical Engineering Services Report, prepared by Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) and dated August 24, 2012; C. Hydrology Report, 3303 & 3355 Via Lido, prepared by C&V Consulting, Inc., and dated March 5, 2013; D. Water Quality Management Plan, prepared by C&V Consulting, Inc., and dated February 2013; E I . Report of Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by PSI and dated August 29, 2012; E2. Phase It Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by PSI and dated May 24, 2013; E3. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey, Office Building, 3355 Via Lido, prepared by PSI and dated October 8, 2012; E4. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey, Proposed Christian Science First Church, 3303 Via Lido, prepared by PSI and dated September 27, 2012; and F. Miscellaneous correspondence. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 1-4 Declaration 1.0 Introduction G. Preliminary Sewer Analysis, prepared by C&V Consulting, Inc., and dated June 2013. 1.4.6 Preparation and Processing of this Mitigated Negative Declaration The City of Newport Beach Planning Division directed and supervised the preparation of this MND. Although prepared with assistance of the consulting firm T&B Planning, Inc., the content contained within and the conclusions drawn by this MND reflect the sole independent judgment of the City. Following completion of this MND, A Notice of Intent (NOI) to adopt the MND will be distributed to the following entities: 1) organizations and individuals who have previously requested such notice in writing; 2) direct mailing to the owners of property contiguous to the Project and property owners within a 300 -foot radius as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll; 3) the Orange County Clerk; and 4) Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse for review by state agencies. The NOI will identify the location(s) where the MND, Initial Study, MMRP, and associated technical reports are available for public review. In addition, notice of the public review period also will occur via posting of a notice on- and off-site (at City Hall, 100 Civic Center Drive) in the area where the Project is to be located and publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the Project area. The NOI also establishes a 30 -day public review period during which comments on the adequacy of the MND document may be provided to the City of Newport Beach Planning Division. Following the 30 -day public review period, the City of Newport Beach will review any comment letters received and will determine whether any substantive comments were provided that may warrant revisions to the MND document. If substantial revisions are not necessary (as defined by CEQA Guidelines §15073.5[b]), then the MND and Initial Study would be finalized and forwarded to the Newport Beach Planning Commission and City Council for review as part of their deliberations concerning the proposed Project. The City of Newport Beach Planning Commission has the authority to recommend, conditionally recommend, or not recommend the Project for approval by the City Council. The Newport Beach City Council has the authority to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the Project. Accordingly, public hearings will be held before the Newport Beach Planning Commission and City Council to consider the proposed Project and the adequacy of this MND. Public comments will be heard and considered at the hearings. At the conclusion of the public hearing process, the City Council will take action to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the proposed Project. If approved, the City Council will adopt findings relative to the Project's environmental effects as disclosed in the MND and a Notice of Determination (NOD) will be filed with the Orange County Clerk. If the Project is approved by the City Council, the Coastal Land Use Plan (CLUP) amendment and subsequent Coastal Development Permit (CDP) would then be considered by the California Coastal Commission. A CDP is required because the site is located in the coastal zone and subject to the California Coastal Act of 1976. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 1-5 ON ■ FIMitigated Negative Declaration 2.0 Environmental Setting 2.0 Environmental Setting 2.1 Project Location As shown on Figure 2-I, Regional Location Map, and Figure 2-2, Vicinity Map, the proposed Project site is located within the southwestern portion of the City of Newport Beach, in the northerly section of the Balboa Peninsula. The Pacific Ocean is located approximately 0.3 miles to the west of the property and Newport Bay is located approximately 165 feet to the east. Specifically, the proposed Project site comprises approximately 1.2 acres of land located at the street addresses of 3303 and 3355 Via Lido. The site is triangular in shape and is bounded on the west by Via Oporto, on the east/northeast by Via Lido, and on the south by Via Malaga. Abutting the site on the north at the intersection of Via Lido and Via Oporto is an existing commercial office development. The subject property encompasses Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APNs) 423-112-02 and 423-112-03, and is located in the southeast quadrant of Section 28 of Township 6 south, Range 10 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. 2.2 Existing Site and Area Characteristics 2.2.1 Site Access Primary roadway access to the Project site is provided by Via Lido, located along the eastern Project boundary, and 32nd Street, located approximately 125 feet south of the Project site. Local access is also provided by Via Oporto, located along the western Project boundary, and Via Malaga, located along the southern Project boundary. These local streets provide access to Newport Boulevard, which provides access to State Highway I, located approximately 0.25 mile north of the Project site, and State Route 55 (SR -55), located approximately 2.0 miles north of the Project site. 2.2.2 Existing Site Conditions Under existing conditions, the Project site is occupied by an existing, 3 -story commercial office building, an existing church building (First Church of Christ), a Christian Science Reading Room, and associated surface parking lots with limited landscaping. All portions of the Project site are developed with urban uses. The commercial office building is approximately 32,469 gross square feet (s.f.) (31,290 net s.f.) of interior floor space and is occupied by a variety of businesses, including but not limited to law offices, a hair salon, restaurants, and several vacant spaces. The existing church building is approximately 7,176 gross s.f. (6,900 net s.f.) of interior floor space, while the Christian Science Reading Room building comprises approximately 1,785 gross s.f. (1,684 net s.f.) of interior floor space. A surface parking lot containing 54 spaces is located in the southwestern corner of the proposed Project site and serves both the commercial office and church uses. Street trees, shrubs, and groundcover occur along some segments of the Project's frontage with Via Lido and Via Malaga, while the site's frontage with Via Oporto includes limited vegetation (three existing mature palm trees). The Project site's frontage at Via Lido, Via Malaga, and Via Oporto contains curb -adjacent sidewalks with parking meters and street lights. Figure 2-3, Aerial Photograph, depicts the site's existing conditions as seen from above, while Figure 5-2 and Figure 5-3 depict views of the site from surrounding roadways. 2.2.3 Site Topography Under existing conditions, the proposed Project site is fully developed and relatively flat exhibiting very little topographic variation. Elevations on the site range from approximately 8.5 feet above mean sea level (amsl) in the northwest corner of the site to approximately 10.6 feet amsl in the southeastern corner of the site. Overall topographic variation is approximately 2.1 feet. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 2-1 No 0171 Mitigated Negative Declaration 2.0 Environmental Setting Figure 2-1 HE REGIONAL LOCATION MAP Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 2-2 ' Gardaln Grove ills at in ootAr s T > P -staninste r Porvcm+vE _ Ira etln HKalley Nunta WLBETPo2 - EWSAh - + I ai6 G_ nYF 3 ___+_RFlEN /� b EYORK 'J+'115rF / rantingtir n Beach John"IWay�AirPort 4 - ry o CMesa,,!.'r. o to ` rvi e HAM,LTONeE �s Nw �4rf H 19TH ..i K. / Ne port B ch a tizrZ 1, �z1i1�5 e,usrviuno nyjoaquin'lle 14 N ort Coast -- - 0 INGEcouxn - PACIFIC OCEAN d i KEY MAP a a_ Source: ESRI, CASIL Tiger Files (USCB) Figure 2-1 HE REGIONAL LOCATION MAP Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 2-2 No 0171 Mitigated Negative Declaration 2.0 Environmental Setting ff@QKYM 0 9ti �F! ;' ga J KEY MAP Source: ESRI, City of Newport Beach Figure 2-2 HE VICINTY MAP Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 2-3 iI 1. WilWLPOR7 3A PROJECT SITE x 40 41 ' e ,ty�, MW 6 + , NN onMitigated Negative Declaration 2.0 Environmental Setting 2.2.4 Surrounding Land Uses and Development The proposed Project site is located within a portion of the City of Newport Beach that is fully developed with a variety of residential, office, and commercial land uses. As shown on Figure 2-4, Existing and Surrounding Land Uses, abutting the proposed Project site on the north, at the southeastern corner of Via Oporto and Via Lido, is an existing commercial office building and accessory structure currently occupied by a hair salon, real estate broker, and day spa. To the east of the proposed Project site on the opposite side of Via Lido are several existing office buildings, mixed-use (office and residential) buildings, and two-story residential homes with driveway and garage access from Vida Lido. Beyond these uses is Newport Bay, with a row of boat docks along the harbor frontage. Also to the east of the Project site is the Lido Island Bridge, which the General Plan identifies as a coastal view point within the City. The Lido Island Bridge consists of a two-lane roadway with sidewalks on both sides and a bikeway separated by a wall and railing, and provides access between the Balboa Peninsula and Lido Island. To the west of the proposed Project site, westerly of Via Oporto, is the former location of the Newport Beach City Hall, which is currently being considered for redevelopment with mixed -uses, although the precise nature of future uses at the site are not yet identified. Fire Station 2 also is located at the City Hall site and is not planned for closure or relocation at this time. To the north of the former City Hall site and northwest of the Project site is an existing retail shopping center with a vacant anchor tenant that is currently undergoing tenant improvements for West Marine, a retail boat store. Beyond the shopping center is a mixture of office/commercial land uses. To the south of the proposed Project site, southerly of Via Malaga, is a commercial real estate office building and church facility (St. James Church) beyond which is a 10 -story residential building at the intersection of Via Lido and Lafayette Road. A mix of retail, service commercial, office uses, a mixed commercial/residential building use, and parking lots are located southerly of 32.d Street. 2.3 Planning Context 2.3.1 On -Site General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan, and Zoning Designations As shown on Figure 2-5, Existing General Plan Land Use Designations, under existing conditions the southern 0.4 acre of the Project site (Parcel A) is designated by the Newport Beach General Plan (hereafter, "General Plan") for "Private Institutions (PI)" land uses, while the northern 0.8 acre (Parcel B) is designated for "Multiple Unit Residential (RM)" land uses. The RM land use designation "...is intended to provide primarily for multi -family residential development containing attached or detached dwelling units." The PI designation "is intended to provide for privately owned facilities that serve the public, including places for religious assembly, private schools, health care, cultural institutions, museums, yacht clubs, congregate homes, and comparable facilities" (Newport Beach, 2006a, pp. 3-12 and 3-16). The City of Newport Beach has an adopted Coastal Land Use Plan prepared in accordance with the California Coast Act of 1976. As shown on Figure 2-6, Existing Coastal Land Use Plan Designations, the Newport Beach Coastal Land Use Plan also designates the southern 0.4 acre of the Project site (Parcel A) for "Private Institutions (PI -B)" land uses, while the northern 0.8 acre of the Project site (Parcel B) is designated for "Multiple Unit Residential (RM -D)" land uses. As stated in the Local Coastal Program Coastal Land Use Plan, the RM -D land use designation is intended to "...provide primarily for multi- family residential development containing attached or detached dwelling units" at densities ranging from 20.0 to 29.9 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The PI -B land use designation "...is intended to provide for privately owned facilities that serve the public, including places for religious assembly, private schools, health care, cultural institutions, museums, yacht clubs, congregate homes, and comparable facilities" at a floor area ratio (FAR) ranging from 0.00 to 0.75 (Newport Beach, 2009, pp. 2-2 and 2-5). Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 2-5 o s. Two -unit, Residential Residential r- I Y� Y �1';' • �Y � PR General Commercial Shopping Center NIL Public Facility AIS POR7 3A e SITE J U Qty of Newport Beach _i ti`.� Commercial St. James Church Mixed Use "Visitor Serving _ z� d Commercial Mixed Use Residential (C d T ow Visitor Serving Commercial Mixed Use. Visitor Serving - `P F Commercial •. Am ono er Afi.Vse �Jr:4AW �e . Wfto •Recreation/Marina t Commercial No 0171 Mitigated Negative Declaration 2.0 Environmental Source: a m. 2 o MU -W2 o' C MURM N PF ` o � ` c MU -W2 Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport o � O L_ RMS 20 ac �'0 20/ac`-. PI 0.75 CM 0.3 32nd St U- 0.11 o a� m F �o PF �Ity of Newport Beach RM 156 du Figure 2-5 HE EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS Beach Page 2-7 No 0171 Mitigated Negative Declaration 2.0 Environmental Setting PF PF Z .r O U -W P a o _ G \ O LNO 32nd St U1- qa o ,moo c o PF Source: city of New CA IL 30Th ST y PF pod Beach OS Figure 2-6 HE EXISTING COASTAL LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATIONS Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 2-8 ON O❑ Mitigated Negative Declaration 2.0 Environmental Setting As shown on Figure 2-7, Existing Zoning Designations, under existing conditions, the southern 0.4 acre (Parcel A) of the Project site is zoned for "PI (Private Institutions) Zoning District" while the northern 0.8 acre of the Project site (Parcel B) is zoned for "RM (Multiple Residential) Zoning District" The RM zoning designation "...is intended to provide for areas appropriate for multi -unit residential developments containing attached or detached dwelling units." The PI designation "...is intended to provide for areas appropriate for privately owned facilities that serve the public, including places for assembly/meeting facilities (e.g., religious assembly), congregate care homes, cultural institutions, health care facilities, marinas, museums, private schools, yacht clubs, and comparable facilities" (Newport Beach, 2012a, §§ 20.18.0 10 and 20.26.010). 2.3.2 Surrounding General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan, and Zoning Designations As shown on Figure 2-5, General Plan designations surrounding the proposed Project site include Mixed -Use Vertical (MU -V) and Mixed -Use Water Related (MU -W2) to the north and northeast; Multiple Unit Residential (RM) and Recreational and Marine Commercial (CM) to the east; General Commercial (CG) and Private Institutions (PI) to the south; and Public Facilities (PF) and CG to the west. As shown on Figure 2-6, the Coastal Land Use Plan similarly designates the surrounding area as Mixed -Use Vertical (MU -V) and Mixed Use Water Related (MU -W) to the north and northeast; Multiple Unit Residential (RM -D) and Recreational and Marine Commercial (Cl to the east; General Commercial (CG -B) and Private Institutions (PI -B) to the south; and Public Facilities (PF) and CG -13 to the west. As shown on Figure 2-7, zoning designations surrounding the Project site include include Mixed -Use Vertical (MU -V) and Mixed -Use Water Related (MU -W2) to the north and northeast; Multiple -Unit Residential (RM) and Commercial Recreational and Marine (CM) to the east; CG (Commercial General) and Private Institutions (PI) to the south; and CG (Commercial General) and Public Facilities (PF) to the west. 2.3.3 Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport According to the Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) for the John Wayne Airport ()WA), which is the nearest public airport to the proposed Project site, the proposed Project site is not located within the Al Notification Area for JWA, nor is the site subject to any impacts (safety or noise) due to airport operations. Accordingly, the proposed Project would not require review by the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for Orange County. The Project site does, however, occur within the transitional flight path of the JWA Obstruction Imaginary Surfaces zone established pursuant to Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 77, although review by the ALUC only would apply if a project is proposed that exceeds the height limits established by FAR Part 77. (OCALUC, 2008) 2.4 Existing Environmental Characteristics 2.4.1 Geology The proposed Project site is located within the Orange County coastal plain and is underlain by Quaternary alluvial and fluvial sedimentary deposits. As with much of the Southern California region, the Project site is located in an area subject to seismic hazards, with the nearest fault (Newport - Inglewood Fault Zone) occurring approximately 0.4 mile to the northwest of the Project site. The Project site is not located in an Earthquake Fault Zone per the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone Map (PSI, Inc., 2012a, p. 6). Groundwater at the site is estimated to occur approximately five (5) feet below the existing grade. Potential geologic conditions of concern identified for the Project site include liquefaction hazards and potential inundation by tsunamis. (PSI, Inc., 2012a, pp. 2-7) Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 2-9 NoAAiiinnYari Nanntiva florinrn}inn 9 n Fnvirnnmcn4nl ScMinn Figure 2-7 HE EXISTING ZONING DESIGNATIONS Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 2-10 ON ■ EIMitigated Negative Declaration 2.0 Environmental Setting 2.4.2 Hydrology Under existing conditions, the proposed Project site generally drains in a northwesterly direction. Underground storm drain facilities do not exist adjacent to the site. Storm water runoff surface flows off the site to the adjacent streets (Via Lido, Via Oporto, and Via Malaga), where water is collected in surface gutters and conveyed to the north. Flows are then conveyed to a catch basin where they empty into the Newport Bay. According to mapping by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Project site is designated within FEMA Flood Zone "X shaded," which indicates that the Project site is located outside of the 100 -year floodplain, but within the 500 -year floodplain. (C&V Consulting, 2013a, Section 111.) 2.4.3 Vegetation & Wildlife The proposed Project site is fully developed with existing buildings, a surface parking lot, sidewalks, ornamental landscaping, and hardscape. As indicated in the General Plan EIR, the Project site is not identified as containing any sensitive biological resources and is not located within any Environmental Study Areas that have the potential to support sensitive biological resources (Newport Beach, 2006b, pp. 4.3-10 and Figures 4.3-1 and 4.3-2). The Project site therefore has no potential to contain sensitive vegetation habitats or sensitive plant or animal species. 2.4.4 Historical, Archaeological, and Paleontological Resources According to General Plan EIR Figure 4.4-1, the proposed Project site is not identified as containing any historical resources (Newport Beach, 2006b, Figure 4.4-1). None of the existing buildings are included on the National Register of Historic Places or on the California Register of Historical Resources, nor are they eligible for listing. Due to the developed nature of the Project site, the Project site is very unlikely to contain subsurface archaeological resources. The Project site also is not located within a portion of the City that is identified as having the potential to contain fossil -bearing soils or rock formations (Newport Beach, 2006b, P. 4.4-17; PSI, Inc., 2012a). 2.4.5 Mineral Resources According to the City's General Plan EIR, which relies on mapping conducted by the California Geological Survey (CGS) for areas known as Mineral Resources Zones (MRZs), the proposed Project site is mapped within MRZ-3. Areas mapped MRZ-3 are defined as "areas containing mineral deposits of undetermined significance" (Newport Beach, 2006b, Figure 4.5-4). 2.4.6 Agricultural Resources The Project site is developed with urban uses and does contain agricultural uses. According to mapping conducted by the California Department of Conservation (CDC) as part of the Farmland Mapping & Monitoring Program (FMMP), the proposed Project site is identified as containing "Urban and Built -Up Land." The Project site and surrounding areas do not contain any soils mapped by the CDC as Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Local Importance. (CDC, 20 10) 2.4.7 Rare and Unique Resources As required by CEQA Guidelines Section 15125(c), "Special emphasis should be placed on resources that are rare or unique to that region and would be affected by the project" Based on the site's existing condition and developed nature, the proposed Project site does not contain any resources that are rare or unique to the region. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 2-11 Declaration 3.0 Project Description 3.0 The Project evaluated by this MND is located in the City of Newport Beach, within the Lido Village Planning Sub -Area (Statistical Area BS) of the City's General Plan. The Lido Village Planning Sub -Area comprises just under 17 acres of land containing a variety of land uses, including general commercial, mixed-use (residential/commercial/office), high density housing, the former site of the Newport Beach City Hall (which was relocated in early 2013), and private institutions (churches). The proposed Project site consists of approximately 1.2 acres of developed land bounded by the following roadways: Via Oporto to the west; Via Malaga to the south, and Via Lido to the east/northeast. The proposed Project involves the demolition and removal of two (2) existing buildings on the site and associated parking lots, preparation of the site for redevelopment, and the construction of 23 townhouses in five (5) buildings along with new landscaping, drive isles, and associated parking. The Newport Beach City Council will consider the following actions requested by the Project Applicant. In advance of the City Council's consideration, advisory recommendations regarding the actions listed below will be considered by the City's Planning Commission. I. General Plan Amendment No. GP2012-005; 2. Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment No. LC2013-001; 3. Zoning Code Amendment No. CA2012-008; 4. Site Development Permit No. SD2013-001; and 5. Tract Map No. NT2013-001. Each of the proposed actions is described in more detail below. If the Project is approved by the City Council, the land use amendment and project would then be considered for a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) by the California Coastal Commission. A CDP is required because the site is located in the coastal zone and is subject to the California Coastal Act of 1976. 3.1 Proposed Discretionary Approvals 3.1.1 General Plan Amendment No. GP2012-005 The City of Newport Beach General Plan assigns land uses to all areas of the City. Under existing conditions, the General Plan designates the southern 0.4 acre (Parcel A) of the Project site for "Private Institutions (PI)" land uses, while the northern 0.8 acre (Parcel B) is designated for "Multiple Unit Residential (RM)" land uses. Proposed General Plan Amendment No. GP2012-005 seeks to change the designation of Parcel A from "Private Institutions (PI)" to "Multiple Unit Residential (RM)," whereas the existing land use designation of Parcel B would remain designated "Multiple Unit Residential (RM)." Figure 3-1, General Plan Amendment No. GP2012-005, shows the existing and proposed General Plan land use designations for the Project site. As stated in the General Plan, the RM land use designation "...is intended to provide primarily for multi -family residential development containing attached or detached dwelling units" (Newport Beach, 2006a, p. 3-12; Newport Beach, 2006b). 3.1.2 Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment No. LC2013-001 The City of Newport Beach has an adopted Coastal Land Use Plan, prepared in accordance with the California Coastal Act of 1976. Under existing conditions, the Newport Beach Coastal Land Use Plan Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 3-1 No 01-1 Mitigated Negative Declaration 3.0 Project Description �a �.4 -AZ PF Source: City of Newport Beach 4 MU -W2 f'dl"CC'� fi via maraya 1• IMF 0.75 32nd St OS U-1. �—L r RM < 156 du Existing General Plan Land Use Designations 0? U MU -W2 MU -V I��/ii%Y�7ar i�I p RM el - 20 /ac`. RM 20/ac PF CM Via Malaga 0'3 ' f dl -cel A 32nd St OS FIEE�U 4 RM a !, fia 156 du '\ a a 31 st St < v Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations Figure 3-1 HE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. GP2012-005 Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 3-2 Declaration 3.0 designates the southern 0.4 acre (Parcel A) of the Project site for "Private Institutions (PI -B)" land uses, while the northern 0.8 acre (Parcel B) is designated for "Multiple Unit Residential (RM -D)" land uses. Proposed Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment No. LC2013-001 seeks to change the designation of Parcel A from "Private Institutions (PI -B)" to "Multiple Unit Residential (RM -D)" to match the land use designation of Parcel B, which would remain designated "Multiple Unit Residential (RM -D)." Figure 3- 2, Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment No. 2013-001, shows the existing and proposed Coastal Land Use Plan land use designations for the proposed Project site. As stated in the Local Coastal Program Coastal Land Use Plan, the RM -D land use designation is intended to "...provide primarily for multi -family residential development containing attached or detached dwelling units" at densities ranging from 20.0 to 29.9 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) (Newport Beach, 2009, p. 2-2) 3.1.3 Zoning Code Amendment No. CA2012-008 The City of Newport Beach Zoning Code is contained as Title 20 "Planning and Zoning" of the City's Municipal Code. Under existing conditions, the southern 0.4 acre (Parcel A) of the proposed Project site is zoned "PI (Private Institutions) Zoning District" while the northern 0.8 acre (Parcel B) is zoned "RM (Multiple Residential) Zoning District." Proposed Zoning Code Amendment No. CA2012-008 seeks to apply the "Planned Community District (PC)" zoning designation to the entire 1.2 -acre site. According to City Municipal Code Section 20.26.010(B) (PC (Planned Community) Zoning District), the PC Zoning District is "...intended to provide for areas appropriate for the development of coordinated, comprehensive projects that result in a superior environment...." The PC Zoning District requirements have been met with the preparation development standards and plans for the development of the site with the proposed 23 residential townhomes in five (5) buildings, as discussed below. Figure 3-3, Zoning Code Amendment No. CA2012-008, depicts the site's existing and proposed zoning designations. 3.1.3.1 Planned Community Development Plan (PC) Text The Project's proposed PC text identifies general conditions and regulations and provides for land use and development regulations for the Project site. The PC text is available for public review at the City of Newport Beach Planning Division, 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA. The components of the PC text are discussed below. • General Conditions and Regulations. The General Conditions and Regulations of the PC identify general requirements for architectural design, building codes, flood protection, grading and erosion control, gross floor area, height and grade, landscaping/irrigation, fences/walls, outdoor lighting, lighting for parking/walkways, parking areas, sewage disposal, screening of mechanical equipment, temporary structures and uses, trash container storage, and water service. • Land Use and Development Regulations. The Land Use and Development Regulations of the PC identify a Conceptual Site Plan for the general location and placement of the 23 townhomes, as depicted on Figure 3-4, Proposed Site Plan. The Land Use and Development Regulations establish a maximum density of 20 du/ac, limit development of the site to a maximum of 23 townhomes, and limit the permitted uses of the site to condominiums, recreation facilities ancillary to residential use, and parking lots. In addition, the Land Use and Development Regulations provide Development Standards for the following: floor area per unit (2,400 square feet minimum, 3,200 square foot maximum); maximum building area (63,860 square feet); maximum building height (35 feet 4 inches and 39 feet for architectural Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 3-3 No 01-1 Mitigated Negative Declaration a m F-_ 3 ,a MU -W �ILido Marina Village � Z ,35 1 � v Q' a MU -V 0 Lido Village 0 O RM -D �a 0 PI -B PF cm- PdrCc� rl Via Malaga 32nd St OS 04a d QCaninery V ge o 31 st St v u H3' Existing Coastal Plan Land Use Designations Source: City of Newport Beach PF MU -W \/ Marina Village MU -W of 0 MU -V RM -D 7 Rove/ ve/ 32nd St OS ° ° Cann=ylVe moo' Proposed Coastal Plan Land Use Designations 3.0 Project Description Figure 3-2 BE COASTAL LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2013-001 Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 3-4 No 01-1 Mitigated Negative Declaration 3.0 Project Description PF ltc CG Source: City of Newport Beach MUN 5 RM h 2178) CM 0.3 P ).75 0:75 a-Rsa-r 55 du _ A 42 du 7 du RM :V-/ 15TH1TH-S-T 18 du �—J 18d 4 du 12 du 4Q tr s Existing Zoning Designations Isl 'SON MUN RM 2178) CM 0.3 rRj o EET 55 du 42 du 7 du RM IT 18 du 18d 4 du 12 du g4 0 `s r � r t r � e t/ e t � U -W2 Proposed Zoning Designations LEGEND Residential Zoning Districts = RM - Multi -Unit Residential Commercial Zoning Districts OCN - Commercial Neoighborhood OCC - Commercial Corridor - CG - Commercial General - CV - Commercial Visitor Serving - CM - Commercial Recreations and Marine Mixed -Use Zoning Districts - MU-CV/15th St- Mixed Use Cannery Village ® MU -V - Mixed Use Vedical O MU -W2 - Mixed Use Water Related Special Purpose Zoning Districts O PF - Pubic Facilities - PI - Pdvate Institutions OPC - Planned Community Figure 3-3 HE ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. CA2012-008 Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 3-5 No 01-1 Mitigated Negative Declaration 3.0 Project Description I j I LI f 1AweaAP \� \ VOIZ \ \ \ \ \ 1F, A Rte;,," `" \ 2 s rwownv� '. o r ADA 3 \ ,'� �. II I , PAR CEL 8 �� \ -\-MMANNYTER�0 i i 320 I , PARRINGANALYRS � ARREPERI �m .�,. 11 PRESIA111 IN INE NT ETLED 'ASSEMBLY MY u1AF:Es 1 AN AI w+t£svu[s FNJMER 4 IN,RArBAa°F,RP.,NPEMW.Ra-IFNo.Mw„ rc READABLE O PARRY,'.p.� {� g 'u 2Y ,EONA]TaATINGY,R .a SE n,glN, VINSME "3I SITE PRIMECfBffoPMAnCN nn Mmasssmxuw AwuaxE. em.oRAen NNEFAA � YEAR MINEREST 8 u4S IM qq UREI. u] P,mrmrvwmExvma aEME-LIoBEEPLA N ENTIREmr ,mLRIE,P (PLEM, TERMS) AN BARREN' 'IF MINI ARREETTIN 1'.. SANIS Do K . INTERS, AND A —D. AS RESTATURESIT FEL FORTA �Em abM IF \� �\ AN% E.OENRo.RamuA,DEMENO 3 AN MRSTAMPENED LEASE DATE' JUSE ARE '.A ENEINTED NY LEAN .1IL-1 FIT), A FILMARM UNTERE - SELrEwY, Rx. AS NTERE N. INTERIM III A L NT�� ja�y �lL „EARMPrE�-.� � LANAREAREARRL, I NY OF VICINITY NAP MEA�r�EDEL�� ARE To AREALLA : 11; E: R .,. MONST .,IF,FFA, snsa�xrs TIME INFORMATION — .—Do �TlA AI., Sol, OF I- RNMERFARE I... By Sol ALLEAREFY IFFLY M DAN 11Y M AT . x SEN'RE.A. PPwEYry w TME mr OFxEwoar REwMPART o x� 1 TEMPLE AND STANNAL TAKES AND AS��M� SAM IN MIKE FIRM ELIT-TRIN A LINK Al YET DUErRE AN AAAMMT Ill AN AFFEMATELY OR THE MAP EF SLANT MAL To REA RELEASED MARMEAS 18 19HAID AM ILE IN BOOK N. ERROR So to AN, AR RESEELLNEENTED 'AN$ MR MEAM FELINE .1FORTMENTAL MANDATE � REPAIR NARY 4 1 �` OFFE NAT MxN.o 1A G� , NATTS NINE FORMAYER 10 LIDO ALL YEARMSTATTY �xR�r®OM w 111 21 TNARY TMED. TEFAR TRYLL,. S6 1 F--� (/IF, I, o� ,o 18 O 8 10 ��` Q 9 +• _ oa I I I I /1 1 ICA141PMPE w -�C M'O wAP - �� 11 3 I n n c a _ /�_ tii------------ iL/ o 0 PARCELA I i LJ L J L J — J L J r JI -,ADA SADA � o0 16 15 14 13 12 .I p a/ l E�uMEu I 12 Al IN AMS MP — - EAREVIL --- —D.1 m So.M -I— — IL VIA MALAGA u - Source: Shubm+ naltlson Architects Illi Iql oNEwA>� ,w� - - - - 0 DO ec \ e\ �.Na \ � ARREPERI �m .�,. 11 PRESIA111 IN INE NT ETLED 'ASSEMBLY MY \ ARM EARMAY. z. ,.1 ¢ AS. of PIETA. MENSINDERNME+ ssnE� o "mr, �e R \ \ MY \ A\ III& AN EA�T AN AN OR ANDAYEATED AM PRE MEMP OF TRACT 9 9AN NO AwNOR IN MIN a � BEEDETT OMR MA.R,EY r.M PMaPo�. iv DLIDO—MR REAT AND RA.Y ort MAE'IM..AN (PLEM, TERMS) AN BARREN' 'IF MINI ARREETTIN 1'.. SANIS Do K . INTERS, AND A —D. AS RESTATURESIT FEL I \ �Em dwos IN Pewx N a .RR Roo. R MAINTAINED IN Too Y � FORE c m FOR IF \� �\ AN% E.OENRo.RamuA,DEMENO 3 AN MRSTAMPENED LEASE DATE' JUSE ARE '.A ENEINTED NY LEAN .1IL-1 FIT), A FILMARM UNTERE - AS NTERE N. ja�y YAN OF R �.� n., OR AR, a x THE , mE ax. .x�FANY, --NAI Figure 3-4 BE Proposed Site Plan Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 3-6 Declaration 3.0 projections); building setbacks (as described below); parking (2 attached garage spaces per dwelling unit plus 0.5 surface guest spaces per dwelling unit); common open space (75 square feet per dwelling unit); private open space (five percent of the gross floor area with minimum width of six feet); landscaping and irrigation requirements; lighting; mechanical equipment; telephone, gas, and electrical service; grading; outdoor storage; and sign allowances and standards. Setback requirements from adjacent roadway rights-of-way and property lines as specified by the PC include the following: o Via Lido: 9 feet at first floor 4 feet 5 inches at second floor o Via Oporto: 6 feet I inch at first floor 3 feet at second floor o Via Malaga: 7 feet 3 inches at first floor 6 feet 6 inches at second floor o Interior Setbacks adjacent to Nonresidential Use Districts: 5 feet Where the standards of the PC text conflict with the regulations of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, the regulations contained in the PC regulations would take precedence. The Newport Beach Municipal Code would continue to regulate development of the site concerning all standards that are not covered by the PC text. 3.1.4 Site Development Review No. SD2013-001 Site Development Review No. SD2013-001 is required to fulfill the requirements of Municipal Code § 20.52.080 (Site Development Reviews) because the Project would consist of a residential development with five (5) or more dwelling units with a tentative map. The purpose of the site development review is to review the Project plans for compliance with the adopted Planned Community Text. As part of Site Development Review No. SD2013-001, the City will review the PC text and plans, as well as the Project's Tentative Map, to ensure the following objectives are met: I. Ensure consistency with General Plan policies related to the preservation of established community character, and expectations for high quality development; 2. Respect the physical and environmental characteristics of the site; 3. Ensure safe and convenient access and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles; 4. Allow for and encourage individual identity for specific uses and structures; 5. Encourage the maintenance of a distinct neighborhood and/or community identity; 6. Minimize or eliminate negative or undesirable visual impacts; 7. Ensure protection of significant views from public right(s)-of-way in compliance with § 20.30. 100 (Public View Protection); and 8. Allow for different levels of review depending on the significance of the development project. 3.1.4.1 Site Plan The Proposed Site Plan is depicted on Figure 3-4 (previously depicted). The Site Plan identifies the location and orientation of buildings, drive aisles, surface parking, existing and proposed property lines, and existing fire hydrant locations. As shown, residential buildings would consist of one (1) duplex, one (1) four-plex building, one (1) five-plex building, and two (2) six-plex buildings. The Site Plan also identifies the applicable setback distances for each of the five (5) proposed buildings. A maximum Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 3-7 Declaration 3.0 buildable area (site area minus setback area) is established as 47,878 square feet (s.f.). A Parking Analysis is also provided, which indicates that the proposed Project is required to provide a minimum of 46 garage spaces and 12 guest parking spaces, all of which are accommodated on the Project site. 3.1.4.2 Preliminary Grading Plan The Preliminary Grading Plan is depicted on Figure 3-5, Preliminary Grading Plan. The Preliminary Grading Plan identifies proposed elevations for drive aisles, curbs, and the finished floor of the proposed townhouses. Proposed slope angles for drive aisles and the front yards of each proposed structure would range from a minimum 0.5% to a maximum of 5.0%. The Conceptual Grading Plan also identifies that the Project's access driveways from Via Oporto and Via Malaga would each be 24 feet in width. The Conceptual Grading Plan incorporates an On -Street Parking Diagram. As part of the Project, three (3) on -street parking stalls would be added along the site's frontage (two (2) stalls along Via Oporto and one (1) stall along Via Malaga), while three existing parking stalls would be removed to accommodate the Project's planned driveway locations. In addition, an existing loading zone and 10 -minute parking zone along Via Lido would be converted to three (3) additional metered parking stalls. In total, there would be no net change in the number of on -street parking spaces available along the Project site's frontage (28 on -street parking stalls total). 3.1.4.3 Building Elevations Building Elevations are shown on Figure 3-6, Building Elevations. The building elevations depict the conceptual architectural characteristics of the buildings as they would appear along Via Lido (east elevation), Via Malaga (south elevation), and Via Oporto (west elevation). As shown, when measured from the existing/proposed grade, all of the proposed buildings would measure 39 feet to the top of the roof access, 35 feet 4 inches to the top of the guardrail, and 32 feet 5 inches to the top of the roof deck. Each building would consist of three (3) stories, with the first floor at grade, the second floor at nine feet, eight inches above grade, and the third floor at 20 feet, two inches. 3.1.4.4 Unit Plans The Project plans include unit plans showing the floor plans of each residential structure. As previously mentioned, residential buildings would consist of one (1) duplex, one (1) four-plex building, one (1) five- plex building, and two (2) six-plex building, for a total of 23 townhouse units. Twelve of the proposed units would offer three bedrooms and the remaining I I units would offer two (2) bedrooms. All units along Via Lido (I I units) would consist of three-bedroom townhouses with a two -car garage, bedroom, and bathroom on the first floor; two bedrooms (including the master bedroom) and two bathrooms on the second floor; and a living room, dining room, kitchen area, and powder room on the third floor. All units along Via Malaga (six (6) units) would consist of two-bedroom units and would include a garage, bedroom, and bathroom on the first floor; a living room, dining room, kitchen, powder room, and laundry room on the second floor; and a den, master bedroom, and bathroom on the third floor. The westerly most unit facing Via Malaga would consist of a two-bedroom unit with a two -car garage, bedroom, and bathroom on the first floor; a living room, kitchen, and powder room on the second floor; and the master bedroom and bathroom on the third floor. Six (6) units would be provided along Via Oporto. Five (5) of these units would be similar to those provided along Via Malaga. The northern -most unit along Via Oporto would consist of a three-bedroom unit with a two car garage, bedroom, and bathroom on the first floor; a kitchen, dining area, living room, and powder room on the second floor; and two bedrooms (including the master bedroom) and two bathrooms on the third floor. Each unit type could accommodate a spa and outdoor use area on the roof deck. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 3-8 No 01-1 Mitigated Negative Declaration 3.0 Project Description Source: C & V Consulting PR 6' GORBL� �a !x - k CUrV laen R./ 0.40 FL u F$ 11"', ab] 9lO BS R•1rtw 1 j k 961 is 9$ BN \ iF•10.]1 FF -9.63 U-1 ftl \ R. Q @•)L ux abs 1s I \ Iri m — n 9618 "� GiF=9.91 CiE �RW CAE=110.W Grt•�f0.05 jM1��I�R(jj tIN.RS FF -Rn FE -9.92 FF -tom / I p 9J1 .al I CFMER ME 9s 9s FC FN91Ep B2YE a l .- n' Fs 1 Is ... SM. ONN MITERED PARI�NC) E15_C�19.Y2Jf- N 6]JA N/N TS _ (BTJJft &B4 f41 -(UI]R) FS _ � �C4� ' ry FI 5I)R \ I - 50.' it -RBI sn {u FL FS , MNWEft " MOESSIN£ UNIT iS�1h1 I= 4 9 � o �iEy� \ f00 -4R 117), 9")TC \ ADO $TALL—sz] Sp�._✓+ Y-+ t y4'•S PR ORNEWAr R� 1 4y� , KIN GWY B - R ST. 'N=24;M l• . "I/ ' - �AOG 11.L \ FF-B.W RELMIE R SI. IIGW FS .- 10.01 FS B ]2 R ?N �\ Fr=10.01 eR0A4 sT,uE Te me uT� FL v 3 L 2 I2R'39'34' 14L PR 6' GORBL� �a !x - k CUrV laen R./ 0.40 FL u F$ 11"', ab] 9lO BS R•1rtw 1 j k 961 is 9$ BN \ iF•10.]1 FF -9.63 U-1 ftl \ R. Q @•)L ux abs 1s I \ Iri m — n 9618 "� � TFnow 55 1n.Ro_E� w I CFF=R69 GiF=9.91 CiE �RW CAE=110.W Grt•�f0.05 jM1��I�R(jj tIN.RS FF -Rn FE -9.92 FF -tom IF-1o.m p 9J1 .al I CFMER ME 9s 9s FC FN91Ep B2YE 1 s .- n' Fs 1 Is ... SM. ONN MITERED PARI�NC) E15_C�19.Y2Jf- N 6]JA N/N TS _ (BTJJft &B4 f41 -(UI]R) I'L _ � �C4� 09trL ry FI 5I)R \ I - - STA ' VIA sn {u FL FS 1LL' 18 ti, i \ " MOESSIN£ UNIT 524 � o �iEy� \ f00 -4R 117), 9")TC \ ADO $TALL—sz] Sp�._✓+ Y-+ t y4'•S saz R� 1 4y� , KIN GWY � TFnow 55 1n.Ro_E� w I CFF=R69 GiF=9.91 CiE �RW CAE=110.W Grt•�f0.05 jM1��I�R(jj tIN.RS FF -Rn FE -9.92 FF -tom IF-1o.m p 9J1 v5 CFMER ME 9s 9s FC FN91Ep B2YE 1 s .- n' 9595"e elNIAORRE 1 Is ... SM. ONN MITERED PARI�NC) E15_C�19.Y2Jf- N 6]JA N/N TS _ (BTJJft &B4 f41 -(UI]R) RP NOT POINT _ � �C4� 09trL 529 STIRRER J I - - STA ' VIA 9.3])TO �(N]2)fL rF-f6.6z 062 _ f9 n)r0 6PI)R IA 2 1 SA \ FF=IO.B PP]PoSEO S"D" K MNMN - �fx M PaPo5f0 M\IER ME W NYESNC NATER e MMN]IE CFMER ME _ _ _ _ E%. L.O. ZONE BEFO49KNiOON TO -T—L FC FN91Ep B2YE }( .- REMWE $IAIL— 'METLR) / 1 F5 U. K MIN. P IE NI MO BE GMiY£AIED TD AOORN)NPL Is ... SM. ONN MITERED PARI�NC) ITT $TAL— 5]O ti O - FMISMC G6 NME RP NOT POINT 'SING TO.EPWVE UNE SWIiARY SEREST 529 J 526 DRIn WNxOEE sn {u FL Fa 5p6 j SG5 1LL' 18 ti, i + " MOESSIN£ UNIT 524 � o �iEy� \ f00 -4R 117), ADO $TALL—sz] Sp�._✓+ Y-+ t y4'•S saz R� 1 4y� , KIN GWY :"\ RI $26 519 'IR s•n wn Sll $16 .515 . "I/ ' - �AOG 11.L FF=IO.B PP]PoSEO S"D" K MNMN - PR]PoSEO SFMR ME \ PaPo5f0 M\IER ME W NYESNC NATER 2 FS Is MMN]IE CFMER ME _ _ _ _ PPoM£IlIY urE FC FN91Ep B2YE DIM CUPS AND GMTLF MPlOSEG f%ISING SKEII R/* .1. 3W FF . Is ... SM. E%ISING OUR ICE ETTIN MMN fYJSMG WON MN IME SF - FMISMC G6 NME RP NOT POINT 'SING TO.EPWVE UNE SWIiARY SEREST 'IS M. G WWVE DRIn WNxOEE METRIC C[MWR {u FL 5 v STREET USK ® " MOESSIN£ UNIT � o �iEy� \ f00 -4R 117), ws \ W � i45 TL=1138 `F \ e R s2)F 'S R . 00' 102.-0' \ L 2 I2R'39'34' 89'vi'12W 23419 \ NC 6 1C (1259) R F C',IL F a 10""k`L sl 59.3R 5111 Tu N PA GANEYNY w4&; A=} `f%. CInLS RfuovE sTUIs swlFrzG ON -STREET PARKING DIAGRAM 1' - 50' PARKING SUMMARY .NM S1NL5 USING: 29 SMIRK; sTNL3 IEWdtD 3 PNGKNG SMLB ISg4 4 roiM ON-SIM1IIi MINING, W PICPoSFD GUIR ONI CNRR ARRRE'AATIONS: �L LfWIM ME PP]PoSEO S"D" K MNMN - PR]PoSEO SFMR ME NSC PaPo5f0 M\IER ME W NYESNC NATER PPoWSEG ST.., ME MMN]IE CFMER ME _ _ _ _ PPoM£IlIY urE FC FN91Ep B2YE DIM CUPS AND GMTLF MPlOSEG f%ISING SKEII R/* .1. 3W FF . Is ... SM. E%ISING OUR ICE ETTIN MMN fYJSMG WON MN IME SF - FMISMC G6 NME RP NOT POINT 'SING TO.EPWVE UNE SWIiARY SEREST WmrvG EMITPoC ME M. G WWVE DRIn WNxOEE METRIC C[MWR {u NNE NRRWl1 4,— STREET USK ® " MOESSIN£ UNIT ARRRE'AATIONS: �L LfWIM ME YW MNMN ® C<mH SIGN NSC MM.NNEOUG W NYESNC NATER YM MMN]IE EM EGGING P. MW T MXINE(IILN FC FN91Ep B2YE PR MPlOSEG FL FMN ME R/* RMO OF 0` Is ... SM. s0 ETTIN MMN C8 CRISIS Re` SF SQUARE FEE' RP NOT POINT Ss SWIiARY SEREST Figure 3-5 HE Preliminary Grading Plan Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 3-9 No 01-1 Mitigated Negative Declaration 3.0 Project Description 11rt116.. ae,m'.11e-.. NNii12HEiG T 48N BIB' -EBBE' EAST ELEVATION -VIA LIDO 1 sCue91e"=r-0" uNm a NEr+m=arm'-e m= mm' SOUTH ELEVATION - VIA MALAGA 2 SP E'. 918"=1'-0' NNT18 HEW 41.96 �0T'=9V WEST ELEVATION - VIA HE ORTO 3 COURTYARD ISLAND UNITSSOUTH 4 SCALE', 1118"=t'-0" Source: Shubin + Donaldson Architects Figure 3-6 BE Building Elevations Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 3-10 Declaration 3.0 Proposed townhouse units would range in size from 2,452.6 gross s.f. (along Via Oporto and Via Malaga) to 3,167.85 gross s.f. (along Via Lido). 3.1.4.5 Landscape Site Plan Figure 3-7, Landscape Site Plan, depicts the proposed landscape site plan for the Project and Figure 3-8, Landscape Planting Plan, depicts the proposed location and type of trees, shrubs, and groundcover. As shown, street trees (Gold Medallion or Water Gum) and groundcover would be planted along the site's street frontages. The corner of Via Lido and Via Malaga would feature a common open space area with low seatwall/planter, accent palm, and water feature with spillway. Other common open space areas (located at the north end of the site along Via Lido and the southwest corner of the site at the corner of Via Malaga and Via Oporto) would be improved with enhanced paving, seating, and landscaping (including accent palms). In front of each townhouse unit, a low stone planter wall would be provided along with a 38 -inch high stained wood privacy fence. All unit entries are designed to be improved with enhanced paving. At the northern end of the site that does not front a public street, a six-foot high masonry wall would be constructed with hedges planted in front of the wall. The Project's on-site drive aisles would feature enhanced paving. Shade trees would be provided at the guest parking area in the center of the site and additional trees and palms would be provided within additional landscape pockets throughout the proposed development. Pursuant to the Project's Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) (Technical Appendix D), the Project would install pervious pavement areas on-site to increase the amount of infiltration of site runoff into the ground prior to being discharged from the site (C&V Consulting, 2013b, pp. 13-15). 3.1.4.6 Open Space Calculations Open space areas proposed on the Project site are depicted on Figure 3-9, Open Space Calculations. As shown, the Project's common open space requirement would be met within three separate areas, including a 505 s.f. area at the corner of Via Malaga and Via Lido, a 294 s.f. area at the corner of Via Malaga and Via Oporto, a 1,037 s.f. area along Via Lido, and an additional 647 s.f. area along Via Lido. The Planned Community Development Plan designates a requirement for open space that is consistent with Chapter 20.18.020 (Residential Zoning Districts Land Uses and Permit Requirements) of the City's Zoning Code, which requires that residential uses within the RM zone provide a minimum of 75 square feet of common open space per unit, with a minimum dimension of 15 feet. As shown, a total of 2,483 s.f. of open space would be provided with a minimum dimension of 15 feet, which would exceed the Project's requirement to provide a minimum of 1,725 s.f. of open space. 3.1.4.7 Preliminary Utility Plan The Project plans include a preliminary utility plan that depicts the location of proposed sewer mains, domestic water mains, sewer manholes, water meters, and utility easements, in addition to the location of existing utility lines that would serve the Project. According to the preliminary utility plan, existing domestic water lines and sewer lines currently located on the property would be relocated and placed beneath the on-site drive aisles within proposed utility easements. Sewer lines would connect to an existing 15 -inch sewer main beneath the Via Lido right-of-way. Domestic water service lines would connect to an existing 6 -inch water line located beneath the Via Opporto right-of-way. 3.1.4.8 Hose Pull and Hydrant Plan (Fire Protection) The Project plans include a Hose Pull and Hydrant Plan that depicts how the proposed Project would comply with the City's fire protection requirements. A required 20 -foot emergency access route would Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 3-11 No 01-1 Mitigated Negative Declaration 3.0 Project Description Source: LRM LEGEND LOW STONE PLANTER WALL O38" HIGH STAINED WOOD PRIVACY FENCE OENHANCED PAVING ® GLOWING GLASS AND STONE ADDRESS MARKER AT EACH RESI- DENCE ENTRY,TYPICAL OCOMMON OPEN SPACEAREA WITH ENHANCED PAVING, SEAT- ING AND LANDSCAPE © ENHANCED VEHICULAR PAVING O7 GUEST PARKING AREA ® WATER FEATURE WITH SPILLWAY OLOW SEATWALUPLANTER WITH SPECIMEN PALM 10 WHICH MASONRYWALLWITH HEDGEPLANTING 17 NEW STREETTREE 12 SPECIMEN SHADETREE NOTE: SEE PLANTING PLAN FOR PLANTING INFORMATION Figure 3-7 HE Landscape Site Plan Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 3-12 No 01-1 Mitigated Negative Declaration 3.0 Project Description PLANTING NOTES oR Rem E<,REESAN.x NORCO ON 1. GROUND MYER 'BIT" —1— U.G UUYWX 2 PROVIDE A MINIMUM 5 EMT (PREFERABLY 6 SIXTH BUT EMERALD CARPRT TMERALD BARRED TRESS \� Mx"" xx.o�RS �IC BY AN AOROAMOI, �ENa��TMEP nMR xx�.��x SYSTEM o AL - 1 ,x n O� 1 CTsEENUMALBA A.ABC THENTE.E, � _ w ..IF xMoCARP Er. PrsE�nr,,.o ATI xx,r,r<xM, �\ y ,NORM un xmwxoe DO -' sMHE cum EawMMIT ALOE ARESSUBSEENC ( / VIA POOREST EITTRESE WATER ® ° odd RECENT SERUM HOSEPux, vnme ABOT i + l sraa,ENUBGRA x.,. PuaaMuw MRS.E l _�. PARC L % \ TYBIGAL VIA PERTO o SO.< .1 AGARGUES. SHATA 'A, SSW 4 LOCATIONS PHORMIUM �E o � x , o9 NE TUAITEI E,aC„oxs O� TYPICAL TURIGAL VIA LED PLANTLIG MIX SERVE BE UNSPOPLANT WON - _OXIDE ASEENSCAUSSEELVALTO O IF. UINGEIGASM VER O f r s TOPI KITH GAVE EARTHS O�.1EVARCRIEREANCIs NEAYW x o o �,� s O Q 3 I 10 9 M.. i \ 4'"' �� or u NP. aE.r FEAR TNO WAV\MAYERS BE .,U,Rs[MW. �Al,�, sm[¢ EVELUGGEENCYANTAPYTHEE xooxxMns cross>. `�. ,uoo EmE TITER TRAFTY SUDINEX �•.uaUGGS �AYCXGXMHFG. ACCEINTSHELD n LE,NBUCCAUSEEMI 12 e 1 I��EN�a,EouM sEM�'AL. - -- - TYPICAL VA - I •-«rxuM LCERYLEANCENT SHRUB axaExMREx.w,,. AGAVE o� VIA VIAMALACUST AMERICANA AGAVE A77AAUUTA A SUCCUMB PoXRERAND a MEDAL �,xPxs�,Uox Source: LRM Figure 3-8 HE Landscape Planting Plan Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 3-13 No 01-1 Mitigated Negative Declaration Source: LRM F OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS 75 SF REQUIRED PER UNIT 75 X 23 UNITS = 1,725 SF OF OPEN SPACE REQUIRED 2,483 SF OF OPEN SPACE PROVIDED 3.0 Project Description Figure 3-9 HE Open Space Calculations Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 3-14 Declaration 3.0 be provided through the proposed Project site. Existing fire hydrants would remain on the property (one hydrant would be relocated along Via Malaga). The Hose Pull and Hydrant Plan demonstrates that the site would be served with adequate fire hydrants, as the distance from each hydrant to all areas of the site would not exceed a distance of 400 feet. The existing fire hydrants are estimated to have a calculated flow of 3,575 gallons per minute (gpm) at 20 pounds per square inch (psi). 3.1.5 Tentative Tract Map No. 17555 (NT2013-001) As shown on Figure 3-10 and Figure 3-11, Tentative Tract Map No. 17555, the Project proposes a condominium subdivision map to consolidate six underlying parcels and facilitate development of the site with 23 multifamily townhouse condominiums. Tentative Tract Map No. 17555 indicates the locations of the 23 proposed units, parking areas, and drive aisles; depicts the planned topographic elevations for the site and buildings; identifies the locations of existing and planned wet and dry utility improvements and connections; depicts the location of planned improvements in relation to existing streets (note: public streets are not proposed for improvement as part of the Project); provides for drainage improvements on-site; identifies the location of existing and proposed fire hydrant locations; and provides for the abandonment of five (5) existing utility easements and the establishment of a 20 -foot wide emergency access easement and proposed utility easements on-site, including a ten -foot wide sewer easement that would be provided in the southeastern corner of the Project site and would facilitate a connection to the existing sewer main located in Via Lido. 3.1.6 Approvals Required from Other Agencies Assuming that the City Council approves the Project's proposed Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment No. LC2013-001, the Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment would require review and approval from the California Coastal Commission (CCC) as part of a noticed public hearing. If the Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment is approved by the CCC, then the Project Applicant would subsequently be required to apply for a Coastal Development Permit. Since the City of Newport Beach does not have a certified Local Coastal Program, the Project Applicant would be required to obtain a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) from the CCC, wherein the CCC would review the proposed development for conformance with the City's Coastal Land Use Plan (as amended by the proposed Project) and for consistency with the objectives and requirements of the Coastal Zone Conservation Act. In addition, the Project would require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). 3.2 Project Technical Characteristics 3.2.1 Demolition In order to construct the proposed Project, existing buildings and associated site improvements located on the property would be demolished and cleared from the site. A demolition permit could not be issued by the City of Newport Beach until after issuance of a CDP by the CCC. Buildings to be demolished include an existing office building (32,469 gross s.f.) and an existing church building (7,176 gross s.f.) and associated church reading room (1,785 gross s.f.). In total, 41,430 gross s.f. of building area would be demolished. Additionally, the site's existing 54 -space off-street parking lot and landscape and hardscape areas would be removed to prepare the site for redevelopment. Short sidewalks sections along Via Malaga and Via Oporto where the Project's proposed access driveways would connect to these streets also would be removed. Demolition activities on-site are projected to result in the creation of approximately 1,905.78 tons of debris (Urban Crossroads, 2013, p. 3). Demolition Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 3-15 No 01-1 Mitigated Negative Declaration 3.0 Project Description ,HPE { III \Z I X51 k II X9` I, I I I VIII � I za 1 I � n9c I I I I I I II I I II -I II II I I I Source: C & V Consulting Eng, TENTATIVE �ONDOMINIUM TRACTPURPOSES MAP NO. 17555 FOR\ ` IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE STATE OF CALIFORNIA EASEMENTS M BE ABANDONED 16— AN EASEMENT GROWN OR DEDICATED ON ME MAP OF TRACT MAP NO. 902 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 1% 1928 AND ON FIE IN BOOR 2% PAGES 25 TO M. OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS FOR PUBLIC JOLTED AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES. o-- AN EASEMENT SHOWN OR DEDICATED ON ME MAP W TRACT M. 1117 BECOMES JANUARY 19, HAY. AND W FILE IN BOOR 35, PAM 4B. M MISCELLANEOUS MAPS FOR PU&IC UTUMS AW INCIDENTAL PARODIED ]� AN EASEMENT FOR AM PIPES AND MNXS MR ME WRROME OF CONVEYING GAS MR HEAT AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED FEBRUARY 20. IBM BOOR 152], PAGE 120 OF CREEDAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR CE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMEMY OF CALIFORNIA 6 AN EASEMENT FOR PURUC UTILITIES AND ACIMMAL PURPOSES RECOROM MAY 21 1951 AS BOO( 2191 ^ PAM 200 OF OPTICAL RECORDS IN FAVOR OF WY OF NUMPO T BEACH L� AN EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SYSTEM, WNySTNG OF CONDUITS WHO. CABLES AND A CONCRETE TRANSFORM" VAULT PMO IRGOONTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED JULY 25. 1958 AS INSTRUMENT N0. 104252 IN ..35BB, PACE 84 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS IN FAVOR OF MUMMER CALEDONIA EDSON GOMPNJY, A MRSMIATON NOTE: A PARTIAL QUITCLAIM M SAID EASEMENT WAS RECORDED DECEMBER 13, 1957 IN BOD( 84M. PAM 177 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTING A PORTION OF SAID LAND. PROPOSED EASEMENTS \/^�T BY EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT V GOUTY EASEMENT (VANABIE MUTH) LEGEND " - PMfERIY UNE CENTER AAE FAQIRM ONE ProPBnr w B BE MI L ..I �=BOW 15' fl/YIJ XB93V'12'W” 9� YEM EMEXLMVX S I OWNER: NEW PONT BEACH MAR SE LLLP, A NEVADA LIMITED LABILITY LIMITED PARMENUIP zG SOVEREIGN CHOU 9117E 43 LANSING. .1 .11 51CO 7-525-49 EONTACT: STEVE MILLS ADDRESS TAX ZA UNS NA ,.0'VE N:Z REACH LA AccE55OR'E PARCEL NO., PARCEL . 4v 1 2 O2 PARCEL 2 423-112-03 FLOOD NOTE ME wR£CT PROPERTY FALLS MTNN'ONE x- W A PORTION OF FLOOD INSURANCE RALE MAP NUMBER 060.59COMIJ PANEL O381 -J M 538, EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 31ID. 2009 ZONING & BUILDING SETBACK INFORMATON RM MOLT -FAMILY READENTAL FRONT. 20 R MAR 1. DATE OF SURVEY. JANE SU 2012 LES LOTS IGO, 1202, 1203 AND 1284, OF TRACT No. 902, AS RA MAP RECg10E0 IN BOON 2A PAGES 25 TO 38, INCLUMI OF MIMMANEOUS MAPS, IN ME COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALEDONIA. TOGETHER MM THAT PORTON OF ME ALLEY ADJOINING LOTS 1201, 1202, TOGS AND 1204 OF TRACT NO. BOA AS SHOWN ON MAP RECORDED IN BOON 24 PAGES M TO RA INCLMISCELLANEOUSIK OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, BECOME OF ORANGE COUNTY. CALFORNIA, AND THAT PORTION OF NA MALAGA AS SHOWN ON SAIDMAP BOM AS ABANOCNED BY RESCLUTCH OF ME CITY COUNCIL OF NEWPORT BEACH ON FEBRUARY 4. 1948, A CERTIFIED COPY OF SAID RESOLUTCN BEING REMES MARCH 11. 1MAS IN SON 1400, PAM 189 OF OFFEIAL RECOR09, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT ME AREMMUST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1201: THENCE SOUTH O M' 30" EAST 12.5 FEET TO ME CENTER NNE OF SAID NA MALAGA: THENCE SWM B9' 30 IS' WE WEST IDOO FEET TO ME INTERSECTION OF SAID CENTER LINE WONME SOUTHERLY THENTITON OF ME CENREN UNE OF SND ALLEY; THENCE NORTH O' 44' ' ASST 58.88 FEET ALONG ME CENTER USE OF SAO O ALLEY AND ITS SOUTHERLY PRONCATON TO AN ANGLE PUNT MEPBN: THENCE NORM 2T W 00' WEST TO ME INTERSECTION OF ME CENTER LME OF SAID ALLEY MM THE SOUTHWESTERLY PROLONGATION OF ME NORMMSTERLY ONE OF SAN LCT 12U4: THENCE NORTH ST 3O' CO' EAST 10,00 FEET TO ME WESTERLY CORNER OF SAO LOT 1204: MACE SOUTH 27 30' W EAST 9552 FEET TO AN ANGLE PONT IN ME MSTRLY LIKE M SAO LOT 1202: MERGE CO1M O 04' 30 EAST 44.75 FEET TO ME PONT M BEGINNING "LO NG THEREFROM MAT PORTON OF WA MALAGA, A MOST YMIN TRACT NO. 907 IN ME CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. AS PER MAP RECORDED IN 9001 2R, PAGES 25 TO 35 INCLUSIVE OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS IN ME OFFICE OF ME COUNTY RECMWR OF SAID COUNTY, ANO VACATED BY RESOLUTION N0. 32W OF ME CITY COUNCIL OF SAID NEWPORT BEACH, A COPY OF WHICH WAS RECORDED MARCH 11, 1948 IN BCOf WO. PACE 189 CF OFCIAL RECOMS. LEE NORTHERLY OF ME CENTER UNE OR SERO STREETS AS SHOWN W SAID MAP AND EASTERLY M ME gAUMERLY PROLONGATION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THAT PORTION OF ME ALLEY ADJOINING LOT 1201 CK SAID TRACT NO 977 As GRAMEO TO ME OFF OF NEWPORT 1 A 955 ASINSTRUPAL MENT NO lU788N BEAR OPHR. IN GRANT PAREC 10ER 12. O CI MOODS. MAT PONTON M Lon 4 AND 5 OF TRACT NO. 1117, IN ME OTY OF NEWPORT MACH, COUNTY OF ONERM STATE OF CAUFORNIA. AS 9NOWN W A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 35, PACE 45 OF MRCDLANEOUS RP1, RECORDS OF GRANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. TOGETHER MM A PORTON OF ME 20.00 FOOT ALLEY ADMIRING SAID LOTS 4 AMC 5 AS ABANDONED BY REYAUTON OF ME MY COUNOL OF NEWPORT MAGI ON FEBRUARY 4, 1948, A CERTIFIED COPY OF SA10 RESOLUTION BEND RECORDED MARCH 11, 945 IN BOON 1400. PACE 189 CF O FIOAL RECWOS, LESQiIBEO AS FOLLOY5: ARE H221 BENCH MARK: FOUND 3 34' WS ALUMINUM BENCHMARK DISK STAMPED MM -17-77- EU V: 24.503 FEET BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON ME BEARING BETWEEN O.C.S. HORIZONTAL CONTROL STATION GPS NO 5301NG AND STANTON GPS NO, GURIMS BUNG NORTH 35'4Ysr WEST PER RECORDS ON FILE IN ME OFFICE OF ME ORANGE COUNTY CURVE. TRACT AREA (LOT 1)- 52.099 S0. FT (1185 ACRES) a 02/2513 1 Figure 3-10 BE Tract Mao No. 17555 (Sheet 1 of 21 Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 3-16 { Com\ \ 2 \\ \Z r. LOT 1 \ \ PORTION OLOT 4 TRACT 11177 \ \ \ \ MM. 35/48 `\ \ *„\ A: \ e J�Rn EASEMENTS M BE ABANDONED 16— AN EASEMENT GROWN OR DEDICATED ON ME MAP OF TRACT MAP NO. 902 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 1% 1928 AND ON FIE IN BOOR 2% PAGES 25 TO M. OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS FOR PUBLIC JOLTED AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES. o-- AN EASEMENT SHOWN OR DEDICATED ON ME MAP W TRACT M. 1117 BECOMES JANUARY 19, HAY. AND W FILE IN BOOR 35, PAM 4B. M MISCELLANEOUS MAPS FOR PU&IC UTUMS AW INCIDENTAL PARODIED ]� AN EASEMENT FOR AM PIPES AND MNXS MR ME WRROME OF CONVEYING GAS MR HEAT AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED FEBRUARY 20. IBM BOOR 152], PAGE 120 OF CREEDAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR CE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMEMY OF CALIFORNIA 6 AN EASEMENT FOR PURUC UTILITIES AND ACIMMAL PURPOSES RECOROM MAY 21 1951 AS BOO( 2191 ^ PAM 200 OF OPTICAL RECORDS IN FAVOR OF WY OF NUMPO T BEACH L� AN EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SYSTEM, WNySTNG OF CONDUITS WHO. CABLES AND A CONCRETE TRANSFORM" VAULT PMO IRGOONTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED JULY 25. 1958 AS INSTRUMENT N0. 104252 IN ..35BB, PACE 84 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS IN FAVOR OF MUMMER CALEDONIA EDSON GOMPNJY, A MRSMIATON NOTE: A PARTIAL QUITCLAIM M SAID EASEMENT WAS RECORDED DECEMBER 13, 1957 IN BOD( 84M. PAM 177 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTING A PORTION OF SAID LAND. PROPOSED EASEMENTS \/^�T BY EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT V GOUTY EASEMENT (VANABIE MUTH) LEGEND " - PMfERIY UNE CENTER AAE FAQIRM ONE ProPBnr w B BE MI L ..I �=BOW 15' fl/YIJ XB93V'12'W” 9� YEM EMEXLMVX S I OWNER: NEW PONT BEACH MAR SE LLLP, A NEVADA LIMITED LABILITY LIMITED PARMENUIP zG SOVEREIGN CHOU 9117E 43 LANSING. .1 .11 51CO 7-525-49 EONTACT: STEVE MILLS ADDRESS TAX ZA UNS NA ,.0'VE N:Z REACH LA AccE55OR'E PARCEL NO., PARCEL . 4v 1 2 O2 PARCEL 2 423-112-03 FLOOD NOTE ME wR£CT PROPERTY FALLS MTNN'ONE x- W A PORTION OF FLOOD INSURANCE RALE MAP NUMBER 060.59COMIJ PANEL O381 -J M 538, EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 31ID. 2009 ZONING & BUILDING SETBACK INFORMATON RM MOLT -FAMILY READENTAL FRONT. 20 R MAR 1. DATE OF SURVEY. JANE SU 2012 LES LOTS IGO, 1202, 1203 AND 1284, OF TRACT No. 902, AS RA MAP RECg10E0 IN BOON 2A PAGES 25 TO 38, INCLUMI OF MIMMANEOUS MAPS, IN ME COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALEDONIA. TOGETHER MM THAT PORTON OF ME ALLEY ADJOINING LOTS 1201, 1202, TOGS AND 1204 OF TRACT NO. BOA AS SHOWN ON MAP RECORDED IN BOON 24 PAGES M TO RA INCLMISCELLANEOUSIK OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, BECOME OF ORANGE COUNTY. CALFORNIA, AND THAT PORTION OF NA MALAGA AS SHOWN ON SAIDMAP BOM AS ABANOCNED BY RESCLUTCH OF ME CITY COUNCIL OF NEWPORT BEACH ON FEBRUARY 4. 1948, A CERTIFIED COPY OF SAID RESOLUTCN BEING REMES MARCH 11. 1MAS IN SON 1400, PAM 189 OF OFFEIAL RECOR09, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT ME AREMMUST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1201: THENCE SOUTH O M' 30" EAST 12.5 FEET TO ME CENTER NNE OF SAID NA MALAGA: THENCE SWM B9' 30 IS' WE WEST IDOO FEET TO ME INTERSECTION OF SAID CENTER LINE WONME SOUTHERLY THENTITON OF ME CENREN UNE OF SND ALLEY; THENCE NORTH O' 44' ' ASST 58.88 FEET ALONG ME CENTER USE OF SAO O ALLEY AND ITS SOUTHERLY PRONCATON TO AN ANGLE PUNT MEPBN: THENCE NORM 2T W 00' WEST TO ME INTERSECTION OF ME CENTER LME OF SAID ALLEY MM THE SOUTHWESTERLY PROLONGATION OF ME NORMMSTERLY ONE OF SAN LCT 12U4: THENCE NORTH ST 3O' CO' EAST 10,00 FEET TO ME WESTERLY CORNER OF SAO LOT 1204: MACE SOUTH 27 30' W EAST 9552 FEET TO AN ANGLE PONT IN ME MSTRLY LIKE M SAO LOT 1202: MERGE CO1M O 04' 30 EAST 44.75 FEET TO ME PONT M BEGINNING "LO NG THEREFROM MAT PORTON OF WA MALAGA, A MOST YMIN TRACT NO. 907 IN ME CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. AS PER MAP RECORDED IN 9001 2R, PAGES 25 TO 35 INCLUSIVE OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS IN ME OFFICE OF ME COUNTY RECMWR OF SAID COUNTY, ANO VACATED BY RESOLUTION N0. 32W OF ME CITY COUNCIL OF SAID NEWPORT BEACH, A COPY OF WHICH WAS RECORDED MARCH 11, 1948 IN BCOf WO. PACE 189 CF OFCIAL RECOMS. LEE NORTHERLY OF ME CENTER UNE OR SERO STREETS AS SHOWN W SAID MAP AND EASTERLY M ME gAUMERLY PROLONGATION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THAT PORTION OF ME ALLEY ADJOINING LOT 1201 CK SAID TRACT NO 977 As GRAMEO TO ME OFF OF NEWPORT 1 A 955 ASINSTRUPAL MENT NO lU788N BEAR OPHR. IN GRANT PAREC 10ER 12. O CI MOODS. MAT PONTON M Lon 4 AND 5 OF TRACT NO. 1117, IN ME OTY OF NEWPORT MACH, COUNTY OF ONERM STATE OF CAUFORNIA. AS 9NOWN W A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 35, PACE 45 OF MRCDLANEOUS RP1, RECORDS OF GRANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. TOGETHER MM A PORTON OF ME 20.00 FOOT ALLEY ADMIRING SAID LOTS 4 AMC 5 AS ABANDONED BY REYAUTON OF ME MY COUNOL OF NEWPORT MAGI ON FEBRUARY 4, 1948, A CERTIFIED COPY OF SA10 RESOLUTION BEND RECORDED MARCH 11, 945 IN BOON 1400. PACE 189 CF O FIOAL RECWOS, LESQiIBEO AS FOLLOY5: ARE H221 BENCH MARK: FOUND 3 34' WS ALUMINUM BENCHMARK DISK STAMPED MM -17-77- EU V: 24.503 FEET BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON ME BEARING BETWEEN O.C.S. HORIZONTAL CONTROL STATION GPS NO 5301NG AND STANTON GPS NO, GURIMS BUNG NORTH 35'4Ysr WEST PER RECORDS ON FILE IN ME OFFICE OF ME ORANGE COUNTY CURVE. TRACT AREA (LOT 1)- 52.099 S0. FT (1185 ACRES) a 02/2513 1 Figure 3-10 BE Tract Mao No. 17555 (Sheet 1 of 21 Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 3-16 { Com\ \ 2 \\ \Z LOT 1 EASEMENTS M BE ABANDONED 16— AN EASEMENT GROWN OR DEDICATED ON ME MAP OF TRACT MAP NO. 902 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 1% 1928 AND ON FIE IN BOOR 2% PAGES 25 TO M. OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS FOR PUBLIC JOLTED AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES. o-- AN EASEMENT SHOWN OR DEDICATED ON ME MAP W TRACT M. 1117 BECOMES JANUARY 19, HAY. AND W FILE IN BOOR 35, PAM 4B. M MISCELLANEOUS MAPS FOR PU&IC UTUMS AW INCIDENTAL PARODIED ]� AN EASEMENT FOR AM PIPES AND MNXS MR ME WRROME OF CONVEYING GAS MR HEAT AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED FEBRUARY 20. IBM BOOR 152], PAGE 120 OF CREEDAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR CE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMEMY OF CALIFORNIA 6 AN EASEMENT FOR PURUC UTILITIES AND ACIMMAL PURPOSES RECOROM MAY 21 1951 AS BOO( 2191 ^ PAM 200 OF OPTICAL RECORDS IN FAVOR OF WY OF NUMPO T BEACH L� AN EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SYSTEM, WNySTNG OF CONDUITS WHO. CABLES AND A CONCRETE TRANSFORM" VAULT PMO IRGOONTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED JULY 25. 1958 AS INSTRUMENT N0. 104252 IN ..35BB, PACE 84 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS IN FAVOR OF MUMMER CALEDONIA EDSON GOMPNJY, A MRSMIATON NOTE: A PARTIAL QUITCLAIM M SAID EASEMENT WAS RECORDED DECEMBER 13, 1957 IN BOD( 84M. PAM 177 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTING A PORTION OF SAID LAND. PROPOSED EASEMENTS \/^�T BY EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT V GOUTY EASEMENT (VANABIE MUTH) LEGEND " - PMfERIY UNE CENTER AAE FAQIRM ONE ProPBnr w B BE MI L ..I �=BOW 15' fl/YIJ XB93V'12'W” 9� YEM EMEXLMVX S I OWNER: NEW PONT BEACH MAR SE LLLP, A NEVADA LIMITED LABILITY LIMITED PARMENUIP zG SOVEREIGN CHOU 9117E 43 LANSING. .1 .11 51CO 7-525-49 EONTACT: STEVE MILLS ADDRESS TAX ZA UNS NA ,.0'VE N:Z REACH LA AccE55OR'E PARCEL NO., PARCEL . 4v 1 2 O2 PARCEL 2 423-112-03 FLOOD NOTE ME wR£CT PROPERTY FALLS MTNN'ONE x- W A PORTION OF FLOOD INSURANCE RALE MAP NUMBER 060.59COMIJ PANEL O381 -J M 538, EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 31ID. 2009 ZONING & BUILDING SETBACK INFORMATON RM MOLT -FAMILY READENTAL FRONT. 20 R MAR 1. DATE OF SURVEY. JANE SU 2012 LES LOTS IGO, 1202, 1203 AND 1284, OF TRACT No. 902, AS RA MAP RECg10E0 IN BOON 2A PAGES 25 TO 38, INCLUMI OF MIMMANEOUS MAPS, IN ME COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALEDONIA. TOGETHER MM THAT PORTON OF ME ALLEY ADJOINING LOTS 1201, 1202, TOGS AND 1204 OF TRACT NO. BOA AS SHOWN ON MAP RECORDED IN BOON 24 PAGES M TO RA INCLMISCELLANEOUSIK OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, BECOME OF ORANGE COUNTY. CALFORNIA, AND THAT PORTION OF NA MALAGA AS SHOWN ON SAIDMAP BOM AS ABANOCNED BY RESCLUTCH OF ME CITY COUNCIL OF NEWPORT BEACH ON FEBRUARY 4. 1948, A CERTIFIED COPY OF SAID RESOLUTCN BEING REMES MARCH 11. 1MAS IN SON 1400, PAM 189 OF OFFEIAL RECOR09, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT ME AREMMUST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1201: THENCE SOUTH O M' 30" EAST 12.5 FEET TO ME CENTER NNE OF SAID NA MALAGA: THENCE SWM B9' 30 IS' WE WEST IDOO FEET TO ME INTERSECTION OF SAID CENTER LINE WONME SOUTHERLY THENTITON OF ME CENREN UNE OF SND ALLEY; THENCE NORTH O' 44' ' ASST 58.88 FEET ALONG ME CENTER USE OF SAO O ALLEY AND ITS SOUTHERLY PRONCATON TO AN ANGLE PUNT MEPBN: THENCE NORM 2T W 00' WEST TO ME INTERSECTION OF ME CENTER LME OF SAID ALLEY MM THE SOUTHWESTERLY PROLONGATION OF ME NORMMSTERLY ONE OF SAN LCT 12U4: THENCE NORTH ST 3O' CO' EAST 10,00 FEET TO ME WESTERLY CORNER OF SAO LOT 1204: MACE SOUTH 27 30' W EAST 9552 FEET TO AN ANGLE PONT IN ME MSTRLY LIKE M SAO LOT 1202: MERGE CO1M O 04' 30 EAST 44.75 FEET TO ME PONT M BEGINNING "LO NG THEREFROM MAT PORTON OF WA MALAGA, A MOST YMIN TRACT NO. 907 IN ME CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. AS PER MAP RECORDED IN 9001 2R, PAGES 25 TO 35 INCLUSIVE OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS IN ME OFFICE OF ME COUNTY RECMWR OF SAID COUNTY, ANO VACATED BY RESOLUTION N0. 32W OF ME CITY COUNCIL OF SAID NEWPORT BEACH, A COPY OF WHICH WAS RECORDED MARCH 11, 1948 IN BCOf WO. PACE 189 CF OFCIAL RECOMS. LEE NORTHERLY OF ME CENTER UNE OR SERO STREETS AS SHOWN W SAID MAP AND EASTERLY M ME gAUMERLY PROLONGATION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THAT PORTION OF ME ALLEY ADJOINING LOT 1201 CK SAID TRACT NO 977 As GRAMEO TO ME OFF OF NEWPORT 1 A 955 ASINSTRUPAL MENT NO lU788N BEAR OPHR. IN GRANT PAREC 10ER 12. O CI MOODS. MAT PONTON M Lon 4 AND 5 OF TRACT NO. 1117, IN ME OTY OF NEWPORT MACH, COUNTY OF ONERM STATE OF CAUFORNIA. AS 9NOWN W A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 35, PACE 45 OF MRCDLANEOUS RP1, RECORDS OF GRANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. TOGETHER MM A PORTON OF ME 20.00 FOOT ALLEY ADMIRING SAID LOTS 4 AMC 5 AS ABANDONED BY REYAUTON OF ME MY COUNOL OF NEWPORT MAGI ON FEBRUARY 4, 1948, A CERTIFIED COPY OF SA10 RESOLUTION BEND RECORDED MARCH 11, 945 IN BOON 1400. PACE 189 CF O FIOAL RECWOS, LESQiIBEO AS FOLLOY5: ARE H221 BENCH MARK: FOUND 3 34' WS ALUMINUM BENCHMARK DISK STAMPED MM -17-77- EU V: 24.503 FEET BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON ME BEARING BETWEEN O.C.S. HORIZONTAL CONTROL STATION GPS NO 5301NG AND STANTON GPS NO, GURIMS BUNG NORTH 35'4Ysr WEST PER RECORDS ON FILE IN ME OFFICE OF ME ORANGE COUNTY CURVE. TRACT AREA (LOT 1)- 52.099 S0. FT (1185 ACRES) a 02/2513 1 Figure 3-10 BE Tract Mao No. 17555 (Sheet 1 of 21 Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 3-16 No 01-1 Mitigated Negative Declaration 3.0 Project Description M TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 17555 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE STATE OF CALIFORNIA rteUzT NAP UNIT 1 \ �I� SSCD ,'Bi 4�S1 "IT 2 � iF-9W c4 � UNIT 3 N IOM i UN \ \ NTG V UN I 'R, K IOIx 1 / v Fc-sw - I' q� ET-IGDI UNIT 22 UNIT L\ -UT 1 = KT o y (A/I UNIT 21 1 Pa A � FL UNIT 20% INIT 19=1 A K .U'N+11 UNIT18k TIM YNIT6 ' UNIT K=In9x N— \- \ S FR POG \ 40• \ PRCPoSF➢ •• PINPoSED ]6 Y FOC P91M GE GENXECIgX \ IIPNGKNEMG IMPRWEMEHfS MM MCM M MY NO. ID SIC11N MMB GB MME B.4AR 5F WLLM EEEI 1 MEET NIMH OFY=9m (ST•09I pT.996 01. ON.". I ]' ]' , E 6• Y Y k5' PNMNG `NUM, 65' N FAD .DPA. LINE .ABLE A v f��A SIftW 6 NMB k ICEWNN zr ° y CANNER "ONER TYPICAL EXISTING SECTION v \ .I - - VU OPORTO SECTION "�" x - - N sD% wB, ENI.Ie+G DarE ASNE PMMw slD RON O RON { \ III PPDVEMFRONUEN INENIS e. 5' ,,.. - \ SIpFEI AMI T OF R. Y 5.5' Y 55' Y L. STREET LGm RIK `NAMING GRLE GBARKING A LE NO. LLc LOEwN% 0 k GVRB h GEwY% 1REV I �B CMER GNRP vmER D' TYPICAL EXISTING SECTION VIA YLL1GA %' - SECTION "B" A1T.— vu Uoo K=In9x N— \- \ S FR POG \ ® GNGN MIN \ PRCPoSF➢ .,.In RG.N ]6 Y FOC P91M GE GENXECIgX \ A MR9ISED IMPRWEMEHfS MM MCM M MY ,T ID SIC11N MMB GB MME B.4AR 5F WLLM EEEI 1 55 .1. REY.Fl1 OFY=9m (ST•09I pT.996 01. ON.". F `N, 'Ll PRONOW SERB ME YT UNIT 16 UNIT 15 UNIT 14 N FAD .DPA. LINE v f��A 4 �C �pg� rryye� m• zr ° y Y I s v \ .I - - EnfiIIXG EUEY LNE x - - N sD% wB, ENI.Ie+G DarE ASNE PMMw slD :. - O { \ III 7" e. \ I.,L ,,.. - \ -. T OF A FNE mn. v STREET LGm 4� A CINcmE LLc 6PR 1REV I �B TYPICAL EXISNNG SECTION vmER D' %' vu Uoo D-90 oo's \ q _UNIT 1 s \ L SECTION "C" F71FL K=In9x N— \- \ S FR POG Source: C& V Consulting Eng. ABBREVIATIONS, IXMp 111E YIN NIXWUH ® GNGN MIN N12 B.I. .,.In RG.N FO 919 Orl GFl Y FOC P91M GE GENXECIgX FI EMISHEG GMM A MR9ISED NIT 1i/ MM MCM M MY ,T ID SIC11N MMB GB MME B.4AR 5F WLLM EEEI 1 55 .1. REY.Fl1 OFY=9m (ST•09I pT.996 01. ON.". F `N, 'Ll PRONOW SERB ME UNIT 16 UNIT 15 UNIT 14 FAD .DPA. LINE Cl DIE 4 �C �pg� rryye� UNIT 13 UNIT 12 .. GUM xw vmw ..XG LOB. .I - - EnfiIIXG EUEY LNE x - - IF=IDIE K InM s _ DSVNO SWM mNN ONE :. - mmw Gas uE WSPNG 1ELDH!£ LINE Ex a TILOE EM6HNG EIECINC LNE e. DBAXG BLOW ,,.. - oanxG NwxEn[ -. T OF A FNE mn. TLe 12 �3 STREET LGm Im LLc 6PR 1REV I �B D IG®D D' %' D-90 oo's e q _UNIT 1 Nass lz'.'w za I9' -r L F71FL In / h'� P'L E B s E ELECTRICEA VIAMALAGA N[l x Jz� 41E °CITY °6CRP11°X Ili _Id l a� SSµ Source: C& V Consulting Eng. ABBREVIATIONS, IXMp 111E YIN NIXWUH ® GNGN MIN N12 B.I. LN Ed11E511G MAhA MN MWIOLE EA BABRO FOC P91M GE GENXECIgX FI EMISHEG GMM A MR9ISED R . TIE MM MCM M MY Rflxl. .B. ID SIC11N MMB GB MME B.4AR 5F WLLM EEEI HP NGH FORT 55 .1. REY.Fl1 LEGEN I'MMONE, C. i. GI F `N, 'Ll PRONOW SERB ME FRINYD WRR ONE FAD .DPA. LINE Cl DIE 4 �C FINER, N. — - .. GUM xw vmw ..XG LOB. .I - - EnfiIIXG EUEY LNE x - - EamXG WrtR LINE _ DSVNO SWM mNN ONE :. - mmw Gas uE WSPNG 1ELDH!£ LINE EM6HNG EIECINC LNE e. DBAXG BLOW ,,.. - oanxG NwxEn[ -. EMOVE CONItlM A FNE mn. TLe 12 �3 STREET LGm Figure 3-11 BE Tract Map No. 17555 (Sheet 2 of 2) Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 3-17 �& UNIT 4 �C q rsz SCALE' 1'11 TLe 12 �3 h pm LLc _. D IG®D oz/zma e q _UNIT 1 L h'� P'L \ 41E °CITY °6CRP11°X R a� SSµ oTpOF OF NEWPORT BEACH OF P. E%. 6' Gw LNE i6 Ba91s" \\\ \ . BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL 9T 1 2 � '^\ - Q �.,,. cm- MMm 3355 & 3303 VIA LIDO - ENI z<"' _- _ �roD -- °""' MULTI -FAMILY PROJECT PR MINw �N' SI.YL - ssI PLANS PREPARED BY: ,< °1tt' TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 17555 DB Figure 3-11 BE Tract Map No. 17555 (Sheet 2 of 2) Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 3-17 Declaration 3.0 activities would occur over a period of approximately two (2) months (Wieland-Davco Corporation, 2013). All demolition debris generated as part of the Project would be disposed of off-site. The disposal location has not been determined, but is expected to be delivered to the Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary Landfill, located at 11002 Bee Canyon Access Road in Irvine (approximately 21.7 roadway miles from the proposed Project site) (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.14-39). According to information provided from the Project Applicant, demolition debris would be recycled where possible, but all such recycling would occur off-site; none of the site's demolition debris would be used during construction of the proposed Project (Wieland-Davco Corporation, 2013). 3.2.2 Anticipated Construction Schedule The Project Applicant estimates that construction activities associated with the proposed Project would occur over an approximately 24 -month duration (Wieland-Davco Corporation, 2013). Construction would occur in distinct sequential phases, including: demolition, site grading, foundation construction, building construction, concrete installation, and landscaping. 3.2.3 Construction Equipment Table 3-I, Construction Equipment by Construction Phase, indicates the construction equipment that the Project Applicant anticipates the construction contractor(s) would use during each phase of Project construction. Table 3-1 Construction Equipment by Construction Phase Source: Wieland-Davco Corporation, 2013 (Technical Appendix F) 3.2.4 Construction Employees The Project Applicant anticipates that over the course of the proposed Project's construction, a maximum of 80 construction workers would be employed by the construction activity; however, certain phases of construction would require substantially fewer workers. The maximum number of construction workers on-site would occur during the overlap of rough framing and rough installation of the mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (i.e., during building construction). (Wieland-Davco Corporation, 2013) 3.2.5 Off -Site Improvements Off-site improvements associated with the proposed Project would be limited to: 1) construction of the Project's two driveway connections at Via Oporto and Via Malaga; 2) construction of new sidewalk sections where the property's existing driveway connections at Via Oporto and Via Malaga would be removed; 3) the installation of a six-inch sewer line beneath the Via Lido right-of-way that extends Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 3-18 d r � v c E C Construction Phase w u o = v o° u�i 1 �°. c° 3 Demo 1 2 1 1 Site Grading 1 2 Foundation 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Building Construction 1 1 2 2 Site Concrete 1 1 Source: Wieland-Davco Corporation, 2013 (Technical Appendix F) 3.2.4 Construction Employees The Project Applicant anticipates that over the course of the proposed Project's construction, a maximum of 80 construction workers would be employed by the construction activity; however, certain phases of construction would require substantially fewer workers. The maximum number of construction workers on-site would occur during the overlap of rough framing and rough installation of the mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (i.e., during building construction). (Wieland-Davco Corporation, 2013) 3.2.5 Off -Site Improvements Off-site improvements associated with the proposed Project would be limited to: 1) construction of the Project's two driveway connections at Via Oporto and Via Malaga; 2) construction of new sidewalk sections where the property's existing driveway connections at Via Oporto and Via Malaga would be removed; 3) the installation of a six-inch sewer line beneath the Via Lido right-of-way that extends Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 3-18 Declaration 3.0 approximately 38 feet from the Project boundary; and 4) the construction of a new sewer manhole within Via Lido. The western half of Via Lido would be temporarily closed northerly of Via Malaga during installation of the Project's sewer connection. During the closure, temporary traffic control measures would be implemented to ensure safe and efficient traffic flow through the affected road segment. The Project Applicant anticipates that Via Lido would be partially closed for approximately one week for excavation, installation, and connection of the new sewer line, and up to one (1) additional week during re -paving of the street surface (Wieland-Davco Corporation, 2013). 3.2.6 Future Population According to the City's 2006 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report (EIR), the City of Newport Beach averages approximately 2.19 persons per household (pph) (Newport Beach, 2006b). Accordingly, the Project's proposal to replace existing office and church uses on the Project site with 23 townhome units would result in an increase to the City's population of approximately 50 persons (23 x 2.19 = 50.37 persons). Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 3-19 Declaration 4.0 Project Information 1. Project Title Lido Villas 2. Lead Agency Name and Address City of Newport Beach Community Development Department Planning Division 100 Civic Center Drive (P.O. Box 1768) Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 3. Contact Person and Phone Number Ms. Makana Nova, Assistant Planner Planning Division, (949) 644-3249 4. Project Location 4.0 Project information The proposed Project site consists of an approximately 1.2 -acre site bounded by Via Lido to the east/northeast, Via Oporto to the west, and Via Malaga to the south, within the City of Newport Beach's Lido Village Sub -Area (Statistical Area 135). The site's existing address is 3303 and 3355 Via Lido, Newport Beach, CA 92663. Figure 2-2 and Figure 2-3 (previously presented) depict the proposed Project site's location. 5. Project Sponsors Name and Address Dart Development Group 500 Hogsback Road Mason, MI 48854 6. General Plan Designation The southern 0.4 acre (Parcel A) is designated by the General Plan for "Private Institutions (PI)," while the northern 0.8 acre (Parcel B) is designated for "Multiple Unit Residential (RM)." 7. Zoning The southern 0.4 acre (Parcel A) of the proposed Project site is zoned as "PI (Private Institutions) Zoning District" while the northern 0.8 acre (Parcel B) is zoned as "RM (Multiple Residential) Zoning District." 8, Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the Project, and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Please refer to Section 3.0 for a detailed description of the proposed Project. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 4-1 Declaration 4.0 Project Information 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Briefly describe the Project's surroundings: As previously discussed and presented on Figure 2-4, the Project site is located within a portion of the City of Newport Beach that has been fully developed with a variety of residential, office, and commercial land uses. Abutting the proposed Project site on the north, at the southeastern corner of Via Oporto and Via Lido, is an existing commercial office building and accessory structure occupied by a hair salon, real estate broker, and day spa. To the east of the proposed Project site (easterly of Via Lido) are a mixed-use building and several existing office buildings (located northeast of the Project site) and several existing residential dwelling units (located immediately east of the Project site). Beyond these uses is the Newport Bay, with a row of boat docks along the harbor frontage. To the west of the proposed Project site, westerly of Via Oporto, is the former location of the Newport Beach City Hall, which is currently being considered for redevelopment with mixed -uses, although the precise nature of future uses at the site have not been identified. To the north of the former City Hall site (and northwest of the Project site) is an existing retail shopping center (anchored by retail boat sales tenant, West Marine), beyond which is a mixture of office/commercial land uses. To the south of the proposed Project site, southerly of Via Malaga, is a commercial office building and church facility (St. James Church). 10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement) The Project's proposed amendment to the City's Coastal Land Use Plan and subsequent issuance of a Coastal Development Permit would require discretionary review and approval by the California Coastal Commission, both for the approval of the Project's Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment and for the future issuance of a Coastal Development Permit. The City of Newport Beach would be responsible for issuing ministerial approvals for future implementing projects, including (but not necessarily limited to) the following: final map(s), grading permit(s), building permit(s), and encroachment permit(s). The Project also would require issuance of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). The proposed Project would not require discretionary review or approval by any other public agencies. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 4-2 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Analysis 5.1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. There were no issues identified as a "Potentially Significant Impact." ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture and Forestry ® Air Quality ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Resources I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless Biological Resources ® Cultural Resources ❑ Geology/Soils ❑ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ® Hazards & Hazardous Hydrology/ Water Quality Materials ❑ Land Use and Planning Mineral Resources Noise ❑ Population and Housing Public Services ❑ Recreation ❑ Transportation/ Traffic ❑ Utilities/ Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance 5.2 Determination fro Be Completed By the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Submitted by: Makana Nova, Assistant Planner, Planning Division (Signature) Date Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-1 No 01-1 Mitigated Negative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Analysis 5.3 City of Newport Beach Environmental Checklist Summary Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-2 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact impact 1. AESTHETICS Would the Project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a ❑ ❑ Q ❑ scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, ❑ ❑ ❑ Q including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? C) Substantially degrade the existing visual ❑ ❑ Q ❑ character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or ❑ ❑ Q ❑ glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? It. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES Would the Project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique ❑ ❑ ❑ Q Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for ❑ ❑ ❑ Q agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause ❑ ❑ ❑ Q rezoning of forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(8))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest ❑ ❑ ❑ Q use? e) Involve other changes in the existing ❑ ❑ ❑ Q environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? 111. AIR QUALITY Would the Project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation ❑ ❑ Q ❑ of the applicable air quality plan? Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-2 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-3 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No impact incorporated Impact Impact b) Violate any air quality standard or ❑ ❑ Q ❑ contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net ❑ ❑ Q ❑ increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial ❑ Q ❑ ❑ pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a ❑ ❑ Q ❑ substantial number of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the Project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either ❑ ❑ ❑ Q directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any ❑ ❑ ❑ Q riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on ❑ ❑ ❑ Q federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement ❑ ❑ ❑ Q of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impeded the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ❑ ❑ ❑ Q ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted ❑ ❑ ❑ Q Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-3 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-4 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact V. CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the Project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ❑ ❑ Q ❑ significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ❑ Q ❑ ❑ significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique ❑ Q ❑ ❑ paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including ❑ ❑ Q ❑ those interred outside of formal cemeteries? VI. GEOLOGYAND SOILS Would the Project: a) Expose people or structures to potential ❑ ❑ Q ❑ substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving. i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, ❑ ❑ ❑ Q as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ Q ❑ iii) Seismic -related ground failure, ❑ ❑ Q ❑ including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ❑ ❑ ❑ Q b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss ❑ ❑ Q ❑ of topsoil? C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is ❑ ❑ Q ❑ unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in ❑ ❑ ❑ Q Table 18- 1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately ❑ ❑ ❑ Q supporting the use septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-4 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-5 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Would the Project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either ❑ ❑ Q ❑ directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or ❑ ❑ ❑ Q regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the Project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public ❑ Q ❑ ❑ or the environment through routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public ❑ El ❑ ❑ or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Fruit hazardous emissions or handle ❑ ❑ ❑ 10 hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a ❑ ❑ ❑ p list of hazardous materials sites which complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project within an airport land use ❑ ❑ Q ❑ plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private ❑ ❑ ❑ Z airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically ❑ ❑ ❑ Q interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a ❑ ❑ [Jj ❑ significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-5 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-6 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the Project: a) Violate any water quality standards or ❑ ❑ B ❑ waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies ❑ ❑ ❑ Q or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g, the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage ❑ ❑ B ❑ pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on - or off-site? of Substantially alter the existing drainage ❑ ❑ B ❑ pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of a course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which ❑ ❑ B ❑ would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water ❑ ❑ B ❑ quality? g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? I) Expose people or structures to a ❑ ❑ ❑ p significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ ❑ ✓❑ ❑ Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-6 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-7 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact X. LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the Project: a) Physically divide an established ❑ ❑ ❑ Q community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, ❑ ❑ Q ❑ policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat ❑ ❑ ❑ Q conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? XI. MINERAL RESOURCES Would the Project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known ❑ ❑ ❑ Q mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- ❑ ❑ ❑ Q important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? X11. NOISE Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of ❑ ❑ Q ❑ noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of ❑ ❑ Q ❑ excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic ❑ ❑ Q ❑ increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land ❑ ❑ Q ❑ use land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-7 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-8 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No impact incorporated Impact Impact f) For a project within the vicinity of a private ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X111. POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the Project: (7) Induce substantial population growth in an ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing ❑ ❑ ❑ housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, ❑ ❑ ❑ Q necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? ❑ ❑ R1 ❑ Police protection? ❑ ❑ Q ❑ Schools? ❑ ❑ B ❑ Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ Q ❑ XV. RECREATION (1) Would the project increase the use of ❑ ❑ Q ❑ existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational ❑ ❑ B ❑ facilities or require the construction of or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XVI. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC Would the Project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance ❑ ❑ ❑ I1 or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-8 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-9 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No impact incorporated Impact Impact intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 management program, including, but not limited to level of service standard and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, ❑ ❑ ❑ Q including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a ❑ ❑ ❑ design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ❑ f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or ❑ ❑ ❑ p programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities? XVII. UTILITIES & SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the Project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment ❑ ❑ Q ❑ requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C) Require or result in the construction of ❑ ❑ Q ❑ new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to ❑ ❑ R1 ❑ serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the ❑ ❑ B ❑ wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient ❑ ❑ Q ❑ permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-9 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-10 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No impact incorporated Impact Impact g) Comply with federal, state, and local ❑ ❑ Q ❑ statutes and regulation related to solid waste? XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to ❑ Q ❑ ❑ degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major period of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are ❑ ❑ Q ❑ individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) C) Does the project have environmental ❑ Q ❑ ❑ effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-10 No 01-1 Mitigated Negative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Analysis 5.4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 5.4.1 Aesthetics 5.4.1.1 Aesthetics: Environmental Setting Existing Site Conditions The proposed Project site encompasses approximately 1.2 acres of land bordered by the following roadways: on the west by Via Oporto, on the south by Via Malaga, and on the east by Via Lido. Under existing conditions, the Project site is a developed property with two buildings and a surface parking lot. To help illustrate the existing aesthetic conditions of the Project site, a photographic inventory was conducted on May 2, 2013. Figure 5-1, Site Photos Key Map, along with the six (6) site photographs shown on Figure 5-2 and Figure 5-3, depict the existing conditions of the Project site as viewed from the surrounding area, which include views from the west/northwest, south, and east. As shown in the photographic inventory, the Project site is fully developed. The northern building (see Site Photos I and 2 on Figure 5-2) consists of a three-story commercial building with a flat roof. The exterior materials of this structure consist of windows, stucco, brick, and earth -toned railing. Commercial signage is visible above the first floor of the building. The surface parking lot on the property is prominently visible from this location. The site's southern building is a church with an attached Christian Science reading room. This building is one and two stories in height and its exterior facade materials consist of stucco and glazing. In Photos I and 2, the church building is visible above the cars in the parking lot although landscaping largely obstructs views of the church facade from this location. The roofing materials of the church are prominently visible. As shown on Figure 5-2, the site's existing buildings and surrounding development fully obstruct public views to Via Lido and Newport Bay beyond. A 10 -story residential building is visible in the distance to the southeast, which can clearly be seen in Photo 2. From the south (see Site Photo 3 on Figure 5-2), the site's surface parking lot dominates foreground views from the intersection of Via Oporto and Via Malaga, while the church building is partially obstructed from view by existing landscaping and several brick walls. Public views to Via Lido and Newport Bay beyond are blocked by the site's buildings and surrounding development and landscaping, with the exception of due -east views from travelers on Via Malaga. From the intersection of Via Malaga and Via Lido (see Photo 4 on Figure 5-3), views of the site are dominated by the church building. Views further to the northeast are obstructed by the existing buildings on the site. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-11 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Would the Project: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a ❑ ❑ Q ❑ scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, ❑ ❑ ❑ Q including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? C) Substantially degrade the existing visual ❑ ❑ Q ❑ character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or ❑ ❑ Q ❑ glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? 5.4.1.1 Aesthetics: Environmental Setting Existing Site Conditions The proposed Project site encompasses approximately 1.2 acres of land bordered by the following roadways: on the west by Via Oporto, on the south by Via Malaga, and on the east by Via Lido. Under existing conditions, the Project site is a developed property with two buildings and a surface parking lot. To help illustrate the existing aesthetic conditions of the Project site, a photographic inventory was conducted on May 2, 2013. Figure 5-1, Site Photos Key Map, along with the six (6) site photographs shown on Figure 5-2 and Figure 5-3, depict the existing conditions of the Project site as viewed from the surrounding area, which include views from the west/northwest, south, and east. As shown in the photographic inventory, the Project site is fully developed. The northern building (see Site Photos I and 2 on Figure 5-2) consists of a three-story commercial building with a flat roof. The exterior materials of this structure consist of windows, stucco, brick, and earth -toned railing. Commercial signage is visible above the first floor of the building. The surface parking lot on the property is prominently visible from this location. The site's southern building is a church with an attached Christian Science reading room. This building is one and two stories in height and its exterior facade materials consist of stucco and glazing. In Photos I and 2, the church building is visible above the cars in the parking lot although landscaping largely obstructs views of the church facade from this location. The roofing materials of the church are prominently visible. As shown on Figure 5-2, the site's existing buildings and surrounding development fully obstruct public views to Via Lido and Newport Bay beyond. A 10 -story residential building is visible in the distance to the southeast, which can clearly be seen in Photo 2. From the south (see Site Photo 3 on Figure 5-2), the site's surface parking lot dominates foreground views from the intersection of Via Oporto and Via Malaga, while the church building is partially obstructed from view by existing landscaping and several brick walls. Public views to Via Lido and Newport Bay beyond are blocked by the site's buildings and surrounding development and landscaping, with the exception of due -east views from travelers on Via Malaga. From the intersection of Via Malaga and Via Lido (see Photo 4 on Figure 5-3), views of the site are dominated by the church building. Views further to the northeast are obstructed by the existing buildings on the site. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-11 PR o ECT Ne 1 � li El t • 3 got kk3nY7�7 � i. No 01-1 Mitigated Negative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Analysis NOiSCALE 0 Lido Villas Residential Development Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Figure 5-2 SITE PHOTOS 1-3 July 12, 2013 Page 5-13 t 9T. 'Sic I We: I I k:XA I Lima - Northwest v -- - "mm IOU ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, As shown on Site Photos 5 and 6 (Figure 5-3), views of the Project site from the east are of the site's existing building fa4ades fronting Via Lido. As shown, the existing one- and two-story church building and reading room is constructed in a Spanish Colonial Revival style with pitched clay tile roof, white stucco fagade, and arched windows and entryways. The commercial retail building is constructed in a modern Post -WWII style with three stories and a flat roof. Fagade materials include stucco, brick, and glazing. A blue awning is installed above the first story on the southern portion of the building. As shown on Figure 5-3, views to the west of the Project site are fully obstructed by the existing buildings from this location. General Plan Visual Resources Policies The Natural Resources Element of the City's General Plan identifies goals and policies for the protection of visual resources within the City. The General Plan also identifies key vantage points for protection and/or enhancement, which are depicted on Figure 5-4, General Plan Coastal Views Map. As shown on Figure 5-4, the General Plan identifies the Lido Island Bridge approaches (located immediately east of the proposed Project site), as well as views from Lido Park Drive towards the Rhine Channel (located approximately 450 feet southeast of the Project site), as public view points. Applicable General Plan policies related to the City's public view points are as follows: Policy NR 20.1 Protect and, where feasible, enhance significant scenic and visual resources that include open space, mountains, canyons, ridges, ocean, and harbor from public vantage points, as shown in Figure NR3. Policy NR 20.3 Protect and enhance public view corridors from the [Lido Island Bridge], and other locations may be identified in the future. Figure 5-5, Photos from Lido Island Bridge, depicts Lido Park and the Lido Island Bridge and associated views of the Project site as viewed from the bridge, and also depicts the primary focal point of this view location (i.e., towards Newport Bay). As shown, the Lido Island Bridge consists of a two-lane roadway with sidewalks on both sides and a bikeway separated by a wall and railing, and provides access between the Balboa Peninsula and Lido Island. Users of the bridge are afforded clear views of Newport Bay to both the north and south, along with existing development and boat docks located along the coast of the harbor. These viewpoints are focused primarily on the adjacent waterways and the Project site is not within this viewshed. Lido Village Design Guidelines The City of Newport Beach adopted the Lido Village Design Guidelines in December 2011, which provide design standards for the Lido Village Sub -Area. The Lido Village Design Guidelines are intended to guide future development within the Sub -Area to foster cohesive and attractive development within Lido Village. The proposed Project site is located within the Lido Triangle Planning Area of the Lido Village Design Guidelines. The Design Guidelines include the following goals applicable to the Lido Triangle: • Improvements should be sensitive to the less intensive existing land uses of worship and residential sites. • Traffic calming devices should be incorporated into Via Lido to promote safe street environments for residents and patrons. • Building massing should be more horizontal in form, reinforcing the pedestrian interface. • Pursue added joint parking opportunities. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-15 No ■❑ Mitigated Negative Declaration 5.0 Environmental ChecMist and Environmental Figure 5-4 HE GENERAL PLAN COASTAL VIEWS MAP Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-16 COSTA MESA OW � W� P W� P W O� ? WP I %NEWPORT %SHORES 1 1 P W r I e� 1 , TVRMINB BABI ••o £ 110 O Q 9 M 5 C N i 'ryryE< LegendNEwR0441Ds IUR W R S NCCOUINL euNu 5z E Public View Point NEWPORT PIER Coastal View Road 4P `� Shoreline Height Limitation Zone BALBOA City Boundary PIER OCounty PACIFIC OCEAN Source: Newport Beach, 2006x, Figure NR3 Figure 5-4 HE GENERAL PLAN COASTAL VIEWS MAP Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-16 A 0 On Lido Is rJostaL f ;r1ect looking West East On Lido Island Project Site not visible) Westu.= On Lido Island Bridge: East o Project Site looking South (Project Site not visible) V 2 5 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, The Design Guidelines also incorporate design standards for pedestrianization/edge conditions, architecture, landscaping, hardscape treatments, walls, signage, and lighting. Compliance with the Lido Village Design Guidelines would be reviewed as part of the Site Development Review Permit and would be assured through the City's future review of building permits, as required by § 20.16.020 (General Requirements for Development and New Land Uses) of the City's Zoning Code. Scenic Highways The State Legislature created a Scenic Highway Program in 1963, which is intended to preserve and protect scenic highway corridors from change that would diminish the aesthetic value of lands adjacent to highways. There are no officially designated scenic vistas or scenic highways within the City of Newport Beach; however, State Route I (SR -1) is identified as Eligible for State Scenic Highway designation. (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.1-13) City of Newport Beach Zoning Code Requirements for Lighting Section 20.30.070 (Outdoor Lighting) of the City's Zoning Code regulates outdoor lighting, and includes standards that are intended "...to reduce the impacts of glare, light trespass, overlighting, sky glow, and poorly shielded or inappropriately directed lighting fixtures..." (Newport Beach, 2012a, § 20.30.070). 5.4.1.2 Aesthetics: Impact Analysis a) Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The proposed Project would not result in a substantial adverse effect to a scenic vista. Impacts would be less -than -significant and mitigation is not required. The Project site is developed with two buildings and a surface parking lot that is surrounded by urban development. As shown in the photographs on Figure 5-2 and Figure 5-3, when looking toward the Project site, the existing buildings on the property and development immediately surrounding the property obstruct distant views. Newport Bay is located approximately 165 feet to the east of the site, but as illustrated in the photographs on Figure 5-2 and Figure 5-3, it is only visible from public views surrounding the site when looking due -east from the Via Malaga right-of-way along the Project site's southern boundary and from Via Lido looking east. Because the Project site is located on the west side of Via Lido and the north side of Via Malaga, development on the site has no potential to block Bay views from these roadways. Public views of scenic vistas available at the Project site are limited to views along the existing roadway corridors surrounding the Project site. The demolition and clearing of the two existing buildings and surface parking lot on the Project site and redevelopment of the property with 23 new three-story townhomes would not obstruct these existing views. Accordingly, there would be no substantial change to scenic views available to the public within the Project area. The General Plan identifies Lido Park, the Lido Island Bridge, and the right-of-way along Lido Park Drive adjacent to the Rhine Channel as key vantage points within the City. Scenic public views from these approaches are primarily oriented towards waters of Newport Bay, its boat slips, and the bridge itself. Development of the Project site as proposed would not markedly change the developed nature of the site's existing visual character, as the Project would merely replace existing urban development (i.e., one-, two- and three-story commercial/office and church uses and an associated surface parking lot) with 23 new three-story townhomes. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-18 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, The Project site is located northwest of the Lido Island Bridge along a segment of Via Lido that is at an obtuse angle to the bridge, although the southeastern portions of the Project site are visible from western portions of the bridge (as shown on Figure 5-5). While a portion of the proposed Project's townhouses would be visible from the Lido Island Bridge, this would not represent a significant impact to the vantage points available from the bridge and would not obstruct any scenic views. Buildings proposed as part of the Project would be a maximum of 35 feet 4 inches in height, with architectural projections up to 39 feet. The existing office building on the northern portion of the Project site measures approximately 35 feet in height; accordingly, the residential buildings proposed as part of the Project would be similar to the existing building in terms of bulk and scale. Portions of the on-site church building and particularly its pitched clay tile roof and the upper stories of the on-site commercial office building are already visible from the western portions of the bridge under existing conditions and no scenic views beyond the Project site are available. The portion of the church building and upper stories of the commercial office building that are currently visible would be replaced with townhome units, two of which at the intersection of Via Lido and Via Malaga would be prominently visible from the western portion of the bridge. As shown on Figure 3-8, these townhouse units would be partially screened from view by proposed landscape treatments and would appear as a continuation of surrounding development, as does the existing church building and its associated landscaping. Furthermore, visually significant views from the Lido Island Bridge approaches consist of views toward Newport Bay and Lido Island, and the proposed Project would not obstruct or detract from those views. Thus, the Project would have a less -than -significant impact on the quality of these existing views. Due to intervening development located immediately south of the proposed Project site, none of the proposed townhouses would be visible from viewpoints along Lido Park Drive; accordingly, the Project would have no impact on the quality of existing views from Lido Park Drive. Based on the foregoing analysis, the proposed Project would not result in a substantial adverse effect to a scenic vista, and impacts would be less than significant. b) Would the Project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway? Finding: No Impact. The Project site is not visible from a State scenic highway and has no potential to substantially damage scenic resources in a State scenic highway. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. Although there are no State scenic highways in the City of Newport Beach, Highway I (West Coast Highway), is identified as Eligible for State Scenic Highway designation. Due to intervening development and topography, no portion of West Coast Highway is visible from the Project site, nor would any of the Project's proposed buildings be visible from West Coast Highway. Furthermore, under existing conditions the Project site does not contain any scenic rock outcroppings, historic buildings listed on or eligible for the National Register of Historic Plans. Trees at the site are limited to street trees along the Project's frontages and primarily along Via Lido that are not scenic resources. As shown on Figure 3-8, the Project proposes to increase the number of street trees provided along the site's frontage with abutting roadways, Via Oporto and Via Malaga. Because the Project site is not visible from any State scenic highways and the proposed Project would not substantially damage any scenic resources, there would be no impact to State scenic highways as a result of Project implementation. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-19 ME O❑ Mitigated Negative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Analysis c) Would the Project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The proposed Project would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site. A less -than -significant impact would occur and mitigation is not required. The Planned Community Development Plan (PC -Text) for Lido Villas, which is included as part of the Project's Zoning Code Amendment application, includes architectural design standards as follows: All development shall be designed with high quality architectural standards and shall be compatible with the surrounding uses. The development should be well-designed with coordinated, cohesive architecture and exhibiting a high level of architectural and landscape quality in keeping with the community's prominent location on the Balboa Peninsula. Massing offsets, variation of roof lines, varied textures, openings, recesses, and design accents on all building elevations shall be provided to enhance the architectural style. Architectural treatments for all ancillary facilities shall be provided. (Newport Beach, 2013a, Section 2.0) Compliance with these design standards would be ensured through the City's review of the Site Development Review application and future review of building permits. In addition, and as more fully discussed in Section 5.4.10 (Land Use and Planning) the Project would comply with the various provisions of the City's Lido Village Design Guidelines, including requirements related to architecture and landscaping (Newport Beach, 201 Ib). Compliance with the requirements of the PC -Text and the Lido Village Design Guidelines would ensure that future development of the site is done in a manner that would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the Project site. The proposed Project also would not substantially degrade the existing visual character of the site or its surroundings. Architectural and landscaping elements of the proposed Project would be visually compatible with existing surrounding developments. As shown on Figure 5-6, Lido Villas Architectural Rendering, the architectural concept for the proposed Project would include off -setting planes, variable rooflines, ground -level landscaping, railings along the upper floors, and a street frontage dominated by glazing. Additionally, all of the proposed townhome units would be oriented with the front doors facing adjacent streets (i.e., Via Lido, Via Malaga, and Via Oporto). These characteristics are similar in nature to the existing commercial building located on the northern portion of the site, as well as the more modern architectural style of the property located north of the site at 3388 Via Lido. As compared to existing conditions, the Project's architecture would represent an aesthetic improvement over the existing commercial office building, which features somewhat outdated architectural characteristics and lacks off -setting planes and variable roofline features. Although the architectural style would be more modern than the Spanish Colonial Revival style of the existing church building, the townhome structures would have a comparable array of design features including offsets, variation of roof lines, and other design accents that are characteristic of new developments throughout the City. The proposed townhouse units also are proposed to have railing and glazing features at the street frontage similar to the features exhibited by the existing commercial office building, complimented by an architectural style that is visually compatible with surrounding properties. Thus, the proposed change in the site's architectural character would not result in the degradation of the existing visual character or quality of the site. Based on the foregoing analysis, the proposed Project would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings, and a less -than -significant impact would occur. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-20 H Al % Al I 1pa ii o T AM 1% ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, d) Would the Project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. No component of the proposed Project would introduce a new source of substantial light or glare. A less -than -significant impact would occur and mitigation is not required. The proposed Project site is located within a portion of the City of Newport Beach that is fully developed, and experiences a substantial amount of ambient light from existing urban uses (e.g., neon signs, glass building facades, streetlights, parking lot lighting, automotive headlights, etc.) (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.1-13). Moreover, under existing conditions, the Project site already contains artificial exterior lighting elements associated with the property's existing buildings and street lights installed along the Project's public street frontages. Exterior nighttime lighting fixtures associated with the Project's proposed 23 townhouses would primarily include lights installed on building faces and to illuminate the interior drive aisles and common parking area. The lighting intensity would be similar to that which occurs on the site under existing conditions. Accordingly, lighting elements proposed as part of the Project would not result in a new source of substantial light or glare that could affect surrounding land uses. To further ensure that light and glare impacts are less than significant, the proposed Project's PC -Text incorporates standards related to outdoor lighting, as follows: All new outdoor lighting shall be designed, shielded, aimed, located and maintained to shield adjacent uses/properties and to not produce glare onto adjacent uses/properties. Lighting plans shall be prepared in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Section of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and shall be prepared by a licensed electrical engineer. All lighting and lighting fixtures that are provided shall be maintained in accordance with the approved lighting plans. (Newport Beach, 2013a, Section 2.0; Newport Beach, 20136) In addition, the City's Lido Village Design Guidelines require new development to "[r]educe excessive use of outdoor flood lighting by shielding fixtures or directing light downward" (Newport Beach, 2011 b, p. 3-8; Newport Beach, 201 Ic). As previously indicated, the proposed Project would be required to comply with the above-cited Project lighting requirements of the PC, which are consistent with the lighting requirements of the Lido Village Design Guidelines. Furthermore, all development within the City is required to comply with Section 20.30.070 (Outdoor Lighting) of the City's Zoning Code, as referenced in the PC -Text, including the following requirements: All outdoor lighting fixtures shall be designed, shielded, aimed, located, and maintained to shield adjacent properties and to not produce glare onto adjacent properties or roadways. Parking lot light fixtures and light fixtures on buildings shall be full cut-off fixtures (Newport Beach, 2012a, § 20.30.070.A.1). Spotlighting or floodlighting used to illuminate buildings, statues, signs, or any other objects mounted on a pole, pedestal, or platform or used to accentuate landscaping shall consist of full cut-off or directionally shielded lighting fixtures that are aimed and controlled so that the directed light shall be substantially confined to the object intended to be illuminated to minimize glare, sky glow, and light trespass. The beam width shall not be wider than that needed to light the feature with minimum spillover. The lighting shall not shine directly into the window of a residence or directly into a roadway. Light fixtures attached to a building shall be directed downward (Newport Beach, 2012a, § 20.30.070.C). Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-22 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Additionally, none of the Project's proposed building materials would consist of reflective materials, except for minimum reflectivity of proposed windows on the structures, which is similar in character to existing development in the surrounding area as well as the structures located on the site under existing conditions. As such, substantial glare impacts would not occur. A photometric study may be required prior to the issuance of building permits for exterior lighting and the Community Development Director may order the dimming of light sources or other remediation upon finding that the site is excessively illuminated. Mandatory compliance with the PC -Text, Lido Village Design Guidelines, and the City's Zoning Code would be assured through the Site Development Review application and future review of building permit applications, to ensure that all lighting elements proposed as part of the future development are designed to prevent the creation of substantial light or glare that could affect day or nighttime views in the area. Accordingly, implementation of the proposed Project would result in a less -than -significant impact due to new sources of light or glare. 5.4.1.3 Mitigation Measures Implementation of the proposed Project would result in less -than -significant impacts due to aesthetics; accordingly, mitigation measures are not required. 5.4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-23 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Would the Project: Impact incorporated Impact Impact a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique ❑ ❑ Q Z Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for ❑ ❑ ❑ Z agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or ❑ ❑ ❑ Z cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest ❑ ❑ ❑ Z use e) Involve other changes in the existing ❑ ❑ ❑ Z environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non- agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-23 No O❑ Mitigated Negative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Analysis 5.4.2.1 Agriculture and Forestry Resources: Environmental Setting Forest Resources The proposed Project site and surrounding land areas are fully developed with urban uses under existing conditions. There are no forest resources on the site or within the vicinity of the proposed Project site. Agricultural Resources The City of Newport Beach, including the proposed Project site, is almost entirely built -out and does not contain any significant agricultural resources (Newport Beach, 2006b, Appendix A, p. 23). Additionally, according to mapping conducted by the California Department of Conservation (CDC) as part of the Farmland Mapping & Monitoring Program (FMMP), the proposed Project site is identified as containing "Urban and Built -Up Land." The Project site and surrounding areas do not contain any soils mapped by the CDC as Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Local Importance. (CDC, 20 10) 5.4.2.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources: Impact Analysis a) Would the Project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? Finding: No Impact. The proposed Project would not impact Farmland and mitigation is not required. The proposed Project site and surrounding areas do not contain any lands that are mapped by the California Resources Agency as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (`Important Farmland"). Accordingly, implementation of the proposed Project would result in no impact to Important Farmlands and has no potential to convert farmlands to non-agricultural use. b) Would the Project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? Finding: No Impact. The Project has no potential to conflict with agricultural zoning designations or to impact agricultural lands subject to a Williamson Act Contract. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. The proposed Project parcels are currently zoned for "PI (Private Institutions) Zoning District" and "RM (Multiple Residential) Zoning District" As part of the Project, these existing zoning designations would be changed to "Planned Community District (PC)." Zoning designations surrounding the Project site include Mixed -Use Water Related (MU -W2) and Mixed -Use Vertical (MU -V) to the north and northeast; Multiple -Unit Residential (RM) and Mixed -Use Water Related (MU -W2) to the east; General Commercial (CG) and Private Institutions (PI) to the south; and General Commercial (CG) and Public Facilities (PF) to the west. There are no existing or proposed agricultural zoning designations affecting the site or surrounding areas. As such, the Project has no potential to conflict with agricultural zoning designations, and no impact would occur. (Newport Beach, 2010) According to information available from the California Department of Conservation (CDC), there are no agricultural lands subject to a Williamson Act Contract within the City of Newport Beach. Accordingly, the proposed Project would have no potential to conflict with lands subject to Williamson Act contracts. (CDC, 2012) Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-24 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, c) Would the Project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? Finding: No Impact. The proposed Project has no potential to conflict with existing forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production acres. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. There are no lands within the City of Newport Beach, including the proposed Project site and properties surrounding the Project site, that are zoned for forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production (Newport Beach, 2010). Accordingly, the proposed Project has no potential to impact properties zoned for forest land or timberland. d) Would the Project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use Finding: No Impact. The proposed Project would not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. The City of Newport Beach, including the proposed Project site and properties surrounding the Project site, does not contain any forest lands (Newport Beach, 2006b, Table 3-2). Accordingly, the proposed Project has no potential to result in the loss of forest land or convert forest land to non -forest use. e) Would the Project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? Finding: No Impact. The proposed Project would not involve any changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or the conversion of forest land to non -forest use. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. As indicated in the analysis presented above under the discussion and analysis of Thresholds a) through d) of this section, the Project site and surrounding areas do not contain any lands that are used for farmland or forest land. Accordingly, the proposed Project would not involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or the conversion of forest land to non -forest use. No impact would occur. 5.4.2.3 Agriculture and Forestry Resources: Mitigation Measures Implementation of the proposed Project would not impact agriculture and forest lands; accordingly, mitigation measures are not required. 5.4.3 Air Quality Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-25 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Would the Project: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation ❑ ❑ Q ❑ of the applicable air quality plan? Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-25 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, 5.4.3.1 Air Quality: Environmental Setting Existing Air Ouality The Project site is located in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB, or "Basin") within the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The SCAQMD monitors levels of various criteria pollutants at 30 monitoring stations throughout the air district. In 2011, the federal and state standards were exceeded on one or more days for 03, PMio, and PM2.5 at most monitoring locations while state standards of NOxI also were exceeded. No areas of the SCAB exceeded federal or state standards for SO2, CO, sulfates, or lead. Table 5-I, Attainment Status of Criteria Pollutants in the SCAB, depicts the current attainment designations for the SCAB. Applicable Environmental Regulations ♦ Federal Regulations The U.S. EPA is responsible for setting and enforcing the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for 03, CO, NOx, SO2, PMio, PM23, and lead. The U.S. EPA has jurisdiction over emissions sources that are under the authority of the federal government including aircraft, locomotives, and emissions sources outside state waters (Outer Continental Shelf). The U.S. EPA also establishes emission standards for vehicles sold in states other than California. Automobiles sold in California must meet the stricter emission requirements of the California Air Resources Board (CARB). The Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) was first enacted in 1955, and has been amended numerous times. The CAA establishes the federal air quality standards, the NAAQS, and specifies future dates for achieving compliance. The CAA also mandates that states submit and implement State Implementation Plans (Sips) for local areas not meeting these standards. These plans must include pollution control measures that demonstrate how the standards will be met. ' Note: NOx refers to both nitrogen oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO,). In the atmosphere, NO reacts with partly oxidized organic species to form NO,, which is then converted by sunlight to reform NO. As such, both gases contribute to NO, levels in the atmosphere, and are therefore effectively regulated by both state and federal standards. For purposes of discussion herein, NO, and NO, are used interchangeably. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-26 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Would the Project: impact incorporated Impact Impact b) Violate any air quality standard or ❑ ❑ Q ❑ contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net ❑ ❑ Q ❑ increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial ❑ Q ❑ ❑ pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a ❑ ❑ Q ❑ substantial number of people? 5.4.3.1 Air Quality: Environmental Setting Existing Air Ouality The Project site is located in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB, or "Basin") within the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The SCAQMD monitors levels of various criteria pollutants at 30 monitoring stations throughout the air district. In 2011, the federal and state standards were exceeded on one or more days for 03, PMio, and PM2.5 at most monitoring locations while state standards of NOxI also were exceeded. No areas of the SCAB exceeded federal or state standards for SO2, CO, sulfates, or lead. Table 5-I, Attainment Status of Criteria Pollutants in the SCAB, depicts the current attainment designations for the SCAB. Applicable Environmental Regulations ♦ Federal Regulations The U.S. EPA is responsible for setting and enforcing the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for 03, CO, NOx, SO2, PMio, PM23, and lead. The U.S. EPA has jurisdiction over emissions sources that are under the authority of the federal government including aircraft, locomotives, and emissions sources outside state waters (Outer Continental Shelf). The U.S. EPA also establishes emission standards for vehicles sold in states other than California. Automobiles sold in California must meet the stricter emission requirements of the California Air Resources Board (CARB). The Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) was first enacted in 1955, and has been amended numerous times. The CAA establishes the federal air quality standards, the NAAQS, and specifies future dates for achieving compliance. The CAA also mandates that states submit and implement State Implementation Plans (Sips) for local areas not meeting these standards. These plans must include pollution control measures that demonstrate how the standards will be met. ' Note: NOx refers to both nitrogen oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO,). In the atmosphere, NO reacts with partly oxidized organic species to form NO,, which is then converted by sunlight to reform NO. As such, both gases contribute to NO, levels in the atmosphere, and are therefore effectively regulated by both state and federal standards. For purposes of discussion herein, NO, and NO, are used interchangeably. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-26 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Table 5-1 Attainment Status of Criteria Pollutants in the SCAB Criteria Pollutant State Designation Federal Designation Ozone - 1 hour standard Nonattainment No Standard Ozone - 8 hour standard Nonattainment Extreme Nonattainment PM" Nonattainment Serious Nonattainment PM2 5 Nonattainment Nonattainment Carbon Monoxide Attainment AttainmentlMaintenance Nitrogen Dioxide Nonattainment AttainmenUMaintenance Sulfur Dioxide Attainment Attainment Lead Attainment/NonattainmeW Attainment/Nonattainmere All others Attainment/Unclassified Attainment/Unclassified Source: California Air Resources Board 2010 (http://www.arb.ca.gov/rcgact/20I 0/area l0/areal0.htm http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/feddesig.htm) I The USEPA approved redesignation from Severe 17 to Extreme Nonattainment on May 5, 2010 to be effective June 4, 2010. 2 The SCAB was reclassified from attainment to nonattainment for nitrogen dioxide on March 25, 2010. 3 Los Angeles County was reclassified from attainment to nonattainment for lead on March 25, 2010; the remainder of the SCAB is in attainment of the State Standard. 4 The Los Angeles County portion of the SCAB is classified as nonattainment; the remainder of the SCAB is in attainment of the State Standard. The 1990 amendments to the CAA that identify specific emission reduction goals for areas not meeting the NAAQS require a demonstration of reasonable further progress toward attainment and incorporate additional sanctions for failure to attain or to meet interim milestones. The sections of the CAA most directly applicable to the development of the project site include Title I (Non -Attainment Provisions) and Title II (Mobile Source Provisions). Title I provisions were established with the goal of attaining the NAAQS for the following criteria pollutants 03, NO2, SO2, PMio, CO, and lead. The NAAQS were amended in July 1997 to include an additional standard for 03 and to adopt a NAAQS for PM2.5• Mobile source emissions are regulated in accordance with Title II provisions. These provisions require the use of cleaner burning gasoline and other cleaner burning fuels such as methanol and natural gas. Automobile manufacturers are also required to reduce tailpipe emissions of hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides (NO.). NO. is a collective term that includes all forms of nitrogen oxides (NO, NO2, NO3) which are emitted as byproducts of the combustion process. ♦ California Regulations The CARB, which became part of the California Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1991, is responsible for ensuring implementation of the California Clean Air Act (AB 2595), responding to the federal CAA, and for regulating emissions from consumer products and motor vehicles. The California CAA mandates achievement of the maximum degree of emissions reductions possible from vehicular and other mobile sources in order to attain the state ambient air quality standards by the earliest practical date. The CARE, established the CAAQS for all pollutants for which the federal government has NAAQS and, in addition, establishes standards for sulfates, visibility, hydrogen sulfide, and vinyl chloride. Serious non -attainment areas are required to prepare air quality management plans that include specified emission reduction strategies in an effort to meet clean air goals. These plans are required to include: • Application of Best Available Retrofit Control Technology to existing sources; Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-27 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, • Developing control programs for area sources (e.g., architectural coatings and solvents) and indirect sources (e.g. motor vehicle use generated by residential and commercial development); • A District permitting system designed to allow no net increase in emissions from any new or modified permitted sources of emissions; • Implementing reasonably available transportation control measures and assuring a substantial reduction in growth rate of vehicle trips and miles traveled; • Significant use of low emissions vehicles by fleet operators; • Sufficient control strategies to achieve a five percent or more annual reduction in emissions or 15 percent or more in a period of three years for volatile organic compounds (VOCs; formerly identified as reactive organic gases (ROGs) by the EPA), NOx, CO and PM 10. However, air basins may use alternative emission reduction strategy that achieves a reduction of less than five percent per year under certain circumstances. ♦ SCAQMD Rule 403 SCAQMD Rule 403 addresses fugitive dust, and requires control measures to reduce fugitive dust from active operations, storage piles, or disturbed surfaces so as not to be visible beyond the property line or exceed 20 percent opacity. Rule 403 requires the implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction, including the following requirements: application of water on disturbed soils three times per day, covering haul vehicles, replanting disturbed areas as soon as practical, and restricting vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to IS mph or less, to control fugitive dust. Air Quality Management Planning Currently, the NAAQS and CAAQS are exceeded in most parts of the SCAB (as shown in Table 5-1). In response, the SCAQMD has adopted a series of Air Quality Management Plans (AQMPs) to meet the state and federal ambient air quality standards. AQMPs are updated regularly in order to more effectively reduce emissions, accommodate growth, and to minimize any negative fiscal impacts of air pollution control on the economy. The SCAQMD prepared an updated air quality management plan, which was adopted in 2012 (2012 AQMP). The 2012 AQMP was based on assumptions provided by both the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) in the latest available EMFAC model for the most recent motor vehicle and demographics information, respectively. The 2012 AQMP assumes that development associated with the build -out of general plans, specific plans, residential projects, and wastewater facilities will be constructed in accordance with population growth projections identified by SCAG in its 2012 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). The 2012 AQMP also assumes that such development projects would implement strategies to reduce emissions generated during the construction and operational phases of development. Reeional Significance Thresholds California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) allows for the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district to be used to assess impacts of a project on air quality. The SCAQMD has established regional daily thresholds of significance for air quality for construction activities and project operations, as shown in Table 5-2, SCAQMD Regional Significance Thresholds. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-28 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Table 5-2 SCAQMD Regional Significance Thresholds Air Pollutant Construction Operations Volatile Organic Compounds VOC 75 lbs/day 55 lbs/da Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) 100 lbs/day 55 lbs/da Carbon Monoxide CO 550 lbs/day 550 lbs/da Sulfur Oxides (SOx) 150 lbs/day 150 lbs/da Particulates PM10 150 lbs/day 150lbs/da Fine particulates PM2.5 55 lbs/day 55 lbs/da Source: SCAQMD, 2011. http://aamd.aov/cegathandbook/signthres.odf Localized Significance Thresholds The SCAQMD developed localized significance thresholds (LSTs) for emissions of NO2, CO, PMio, and PM2.5 generated at individual project sites (off-site mobile -source emissions are not included the LST analysis). LSTs represent the maximum emissions at a project site that are not expected to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent federal or state Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS). LSTs are based on the ambient concentrations of that pollutant within the project Source Receptor Area (SRA) and the distance to the nearest sensitive receptor. LST analysis for construction is applicable for all projects of five acres and less; however, it can be used as screening criteria for larger projects to determine whether or not dispersion modeling may be required. The construction LSTs for the proposed Project site (1.2 acres, studied at its actual proposed disturbance area of a 1.196 acres) assuming that the entire site would be simultaneously disturbed within 25 meters (approximately 82 feet) are shown in Table 5-3, SCAQMD Localized Significance Thresholds (Screening Level Analysis). If emissions exceed the LSTs (after mitigation), then dispersion modeling would need to be conducted to determine whether potential impacts would occur. Table 5-3 SCAQMD Localized Significance Thresholds (Screening Level Analysis) Air Pollutant Threshold bstda Construction Carbon Monoxide CO 708.74 Nitrogen Oxides IWO 99.64 Particulates PM,o 4.59 Fine Particulates PM2.5 3.39 Source: SCAQMD 2009, Mass Rate Lookup Tables: Based on LSTs for a 1.19&acre disturbance site (using SCAQMD's linear regression approach in SRA 18120 at a distance of 25 meters (-82 feet) between the source and receptor. 5.4.3.2 Air Quality: Impact Analysis a) Would the Project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The proposed Project would not conflict or obstruct implementation of the 2012 AQMP. Impacts would be less than significant and mitigation is not required. The applicable AQMP within the Project area is the SCAQMD 2012 AQMP. Criteria for determining consistency with the AQMP are defined in Chapter 12, Section 12.2 and Section 12.3 of the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993). The Project's consistency with the 2012 AQMP based on these criteria is discussed below. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-29 arrive Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, • Consistency Criterion No. I: The Project will not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP. Construction Impacts The violations that Consistency Criterion No. I refers to are the CAAQS and NAAQS. CAAQS and NAAQS violations would occur if LSTs were exceeded. As evaluated as part of the Project LST analysis (refer to Table 5-7 under the discussion of Air Quality Threshold 4), the Project's localized construction -source emissions would not exceed applicable LSTs with mitigation, and a less -than - significant impact would occur. Therefore, construction activities associated with the proposed Project are determined to be consistent with the first criterion. Operational Impacts Under long-term conditions, the Project would replace the site's existing commercial office and church land uses with 23 multifamily townhouses. As indicated in later in this document in Table 5-10 (refer to Section 5.4.16, Transportation/Traffic), Implementation of the proposed Project would result in a net reduction in vehicle trips from the site by approximately 305 average daily trips. Since the vast majority of the Project site's existing and proposed air quality emissions are associated with vehicle trips, implementation of the proposed Project would therefore result in a net reduction in air quality emissions generated from the site. Accordingly, emissions associated with long-term operation of the proposed Project have no potential to exceed the LSTs and the proposed Project's operational activities are determined to be consistent with the first criterion. • Consistency Criterion No. 2: The Project will not exceed the assumptions in the AQMP based on the years of Project build -out phase. As noted above, the 2012 AQMP assumes development associated with the build -out of general plans. Under existing conditions, the southern 0.4 acre of the Project site (Parcel A) is designated by the City of Newport Beach General Plan for "Private Institutions (PI)" land uses, while the northern 0.8 acre (Parcel B) is designated for "Multiple Unit Residential (RM)" land uses. The Project proposes to change the General Plan designation on the southern 0.4 acres of the site to RM to redevelop the entire site with 23 townhouse units. Development of townhouse units on Parcel B would be consistent with its existing General Plan designation of RM, and would therefore be consistent with the 2012 AQMP assumptions for this portion of the site. The Project proposes to change the General Plan designation of Parcel A from PI to RM, and would therefore not be consistent with the 2012 AQMP's land use assumption for the site. However, air emissions from the site under both existing and proposed conditions primarily are associated with vehicular trips to and from the site. As indicated in Table 5-10 (presented later in Section 5.4.16, Transportation/Traffic), the Project would substantially reduce traffic associated with the site compared to existing conditions. Specific to Parcel A, the existing church use is estimated to result in approximately 82 daily vehicular trips. The proposed Project, inclusive of both Parcels A and B, would generate a total of 134 average daily trips. Because Parcel A comprises approximately 33.1% of the total Project site area, average daily vehicle trips associated with Parcel A under the proposed Project would comprise approximately 44 daily vehicular trips. Thus, implementation of the proposed Project would result in a measurable reduction in the amount of daily vehicle trips associated with Parcel A (net reduction of approximately 38 vehicles per day). Accordingly, there would be a net decrease in the amount of Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-30 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, vehicle -source air quality emissions from the site with implementation of the Project as compared to the land use assumptions in the 2012 AQMP. As such, the Project would not exceed the air emissions projected in the 2012 AQMP based on general plan land use assumptions. Based on the foregoing analysis, the Project would be consistent with Criterion No. 2. b) Would the Project violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. Construction and operation of the Project would not violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation. Impacts would be less than significant and mitigation is not required. Applicable air quality standards were presented previously in Table 5-2 and Table 5-3. The Project's potential for resulting in impacts under both construction and long-term operational conditions is discussed below. Construction Impacts Construction activities associated with the proposed Project would result in emissions of CO, Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), NOx, SOx, PM2.5, and PMio. Construction related emissions are expected from the following construction equipment and construction activities: (Urban Crossroads, 2013, p. 2) • Demolition • Site Preparation • Grading • Foundation/Building Construction/Painting • Site Concrete Site specific construction details are not known with a great deal of certainty at this stage of the development process; thus the Ca1EEMoD model default values were utilized where information was unknown. Table 3-1 (previously presented), summarizes construction equipment assumptions that were modeled for analysis purposes. The pieces of equipment depicted in Table 3-1 were provided by the Project Applicant (refer to Technical Appendix F) for all construction scenarios with the exception of site preparation, which utilized CaIEEMod model details. The Project includes demolition of an existing church, church reading room and commercial office building totaling approximately 41,430 gross square feet of interior floor space. An approximate 1,905.78 tons of debris would be generated and hauled off- site. All demolition debris generated as part of the Project would be disposed of off-site. The disposal location has not been determined, but is expected to be delivered to the Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary Landfill, located at 11002 Bee Canyon Access Road in Irvine (approximately 21.7 roadway miles from the proposed Project site). According to information provided from the Project Applicant, demolition debris would be recycled where possible, but all such recycling would occur off-site; none of the site's demolition debris would be used during construction of the proposed Project. (Urban Crossroads, 2013, pp. 2-3; Wieland-Davco Corporation, 2013) As shown in Table 5-4, Overall Construction Emissions — Before Mitigation, construction activities would not exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds for VOCs, NO., CO, SOx, PMio, or PM2.5. Table 5-5, Overall Construction Emissions — With Mitigation, provides a summary of regional project emissions with application of BMPs that address the Project's emissions of LSTs during construction (refer to Air Quality Threshold 4). As shown, the proposed Project would not exceed the SCAQMD Regional Thresholds even before the application of the mitigation measures indicated below under Air Quality Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-31 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Threshold 4. Accordingly, the proposed Project's construction activities would not violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation, and impacts would be less than significant. Table 5-4 Overall Construction Emissions - Before Mitigation Activity VOC NO. J CO SO, PM,o PM2s maximum Emissions 72.17 39.73 25.56 0.04 9.17 4.83 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant? NO NO NO NO NO NO Source: Urban Crossroads, 2013 Note: Values shown are pounds per day, and represent maximum daily construction emissions. Table 5-5 Overall Construction Emissions -With Mitigation Activity VOC NO, CO S% PM,o PM2,5 Maximum Daily Emissions 72.17 39.73 25.56 0.04 7.93 2.81 SCAQMD Re ional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant? NO NO NO NO NO NO Source: Urban Crossroads, 2013 Note: Values shown are pounds per day, and represent maximum daily construction emissions following incorporation of mitigation to address the Project's LST emissions. Operational Impacts As indicated in Table 5-10 (presented later in Section 5.4.16, Transportation/Trak), implementation of the proposed Project would result in a net reduction of vehicular trips from the site. Because vehicle trips comprise the vast majority of emissions under both existing and proposed conditions, it is reasonable to conclude that the Project's emissions of VOCs, NO„ CO, Sox, PMio, and PM2.5 would be reduced as compared to existing conditions. Because the Project would result in a net reduction in emission of these criteria pollutants, long-term operation of the proposed Project has no potential to violate the applicable air quality standards or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation. As such, long-term operational impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. c) Would the Project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. Construction and operation of the Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. Accordingly, impacts would be less than significant and mitigation is not required. As indicated in Table 5-1 (previously presented), the SCAB has a non -attainment status under both state and federal designations for Ozone, PMio, PM2.5, and is considered non -attainment under state criteria for Nitrogen Dioxide. As previously presented in Table 5-4 and Table 5-5, construction -related emissions of VOCs, NO„ and CO (all of which are ozone precursors), and operational emissions of PMio, PM2.s, and NO., all would be Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-32 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal below the SCAQMD Regional Significance Thresholds, both before and after the application of mitigation measures for the Project's LST emissions specified below under Air Quality Threshold 4. Given these factors, near-term construction emissions would not substantially contribute to a net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is non -attainment; therefore, impacts would be less than significant. As discussed in detail under the analysis of Air Quality Threshold a), the Project would result in a net reduction in air quality emissions as compared to emissions that occur under existing conditions. Accordingly, long-term operation of the Project has no potential to result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment, and impacts would be less than significant. d) Would the Project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Finding: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Assuming mandatory compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 and the incorporation of BMPs during construction (as required by Mitigation Measures MM AQ -1 and MM AQ -2, the Project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial construction -related pollutant concentrations. Under long-term conditions, the Project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. With mitigation, impacts would be reduced to below a level of significance. Construction Impacts Table 5-6, Localized Significance Summary for Construction (Without Mitigation), shows the maximum daily construction emissions (pounds per day) generated during construction activities compared with the screening level LSTs for a maximum 1.196 -acre daily disturbance area. In accordance with SCAQMD methodology, only on-site stationary sources and mobile equipment occurring on the Project site are included in the analysis. As shown in Table 5-6, maximum daily combined emissions for NOx and CO from the proposed Project would not exceed the LSTs. However, PMio and PM2.5 emissions have the potential to exceed the LSTs before application of best management practices and mitigation measures. The values presented in Table 5-6 do not take into account mandatory compliance with applicable construction -level regulatory requirements, including SCAQMD Rule 403 and standard construction - level Best Management Practices (BMPs) (e.g., application of water on disturbed soils three times per day, covering haul vehicles, replanting disturbed areas as soon as practical and restricting vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph or less, to control fugitive dust). As shown in Table 5-7, Localized Significance Summary for Construction (With Mitigation), compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 and application of construction BMPs would reduce the Project's emissions of PMio and PM2.5 to below the SCAQMD LSTs. As such, mitigation measures are identified below in order to ensure Project compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 and the implementation of construction -level BMPs. With the application of these measures, the impact would be reduced to below a level of significance. Operational Impacts ♦ Operational LST Analysis The proposed Project involves the construction and operation of 23 townhouses. According to SCAQMD LST methodology, LSTs would apply to the operational phase of a proposed project, if the project includes stationary sources, or attracts mobile sources that may spend long periods queuing and idling at the site (e.g., warehouse or transfer facilities) (SCAQMD, 2008b). The proposed Project does not include such uses; thus, due to the lack of stationary source emissions associated with the proposed Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-33 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Project, no long-term localized significance threshold analysis is needed. There would be no impact to nearby sensitive receptors under long-term operating conditions based on the SCAQMD LST methodology. Table 5-6 Localized Significance Summary for Construction (Without Mitigation) Activity NO, CO PM10 PMa5 Maximum Daily Emissions 34.56 21.62 7.85 4.82 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 9964 70874 459 339 Significant? NO NO YES YES Source: Urban Crossroads, 2013 Note: Values shown are pounds per day. Table 5-7 Localized Significance Summary for Construction (With Mitigation) Activity NO, co PM,o PM2.5 Maximum Daily Emissions 34.56 21.62 3.98 2.82 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 99.64 708.74 4.59 3.39 Significant? NO NO NO NO Source: Urban Crossroads, 2013 Note: Values shown are pounds per day, and represent emissions following incorporation of mitigation. ♦ CO Hotspots A CO "hotspot" would occur if an exceedance of the state one-hour standard of 20 ppm or the eight- hour standard of 9 ppm were to occur. The Project would have the potential to create or contribute to a CO hotspot if it were to contribute vehicular traffic to any area intersections that are experiencing high volumes of traffic and that already experience or have the potential to experience substantial CO concentrations. As indicated in Table 5-10 (presented later in Section 5.4.16, Transportation/Trak), implementation of the proposed Project would result in a net reduction of vehicular trips from the site. Since the Project would result in a net reduction of vehicle trips, the Project has no potential to contribute to or create a CO hot spot. Accordingly, no impact would occur. e) Would the Project create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. Impacts associated with odors generated during the proposed Project's construction and long-term operation would be less than significant, and mitigation is not required. The Project is a proposal to redevelop an existing developed property with 23 residential townhouses. The Project does not propose any land uses typically associated with emitting objectionable odors. Land uses generally associated with odor complaints include agricultural uses (livestock and farming), wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting operations, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding facilities, none of which would occur on the property. The potential for odor sources associated with the proposed Project are limited to construction equipment exhaust and the application of asphalt and architectural coatings during construction activities, and the temporary storage of typical solid waste (refuse) during the Project's lifetime. Construction -related odors would be temporary and intermittent in nature and would cease upon completion of the respective phases of construction activity. These odors are common in urban and Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-34 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, suburban areas and are generally not objectionable to a large majority of the population. Additionally, mandatory compliance with SCAQMD Rules would limit odor emissions from construction vehicles. For these reasons, temporary and intermittent construction -related odors would be less than significant. During long-term Project operation, the only potential for odor generation is from temporary refuse storage. However, solid waste collection requirements in the City of Newport Beach require all refuse containers to be covered with a watertight lid, which minimizes odor. The proposed Project would be required to comply with Municipal Code Section 20.30.120 (Solid Waste and Recyclable Materials Storage), which mandates that all multi -unit projects with five or more dwelling units "...provide enclosed refuse and recyclable material storage areas with solid roofs." The proposed Project would also be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 402 to prevent occurrences of public nuisances. Under the proposed project, enclosed trash and recycling areas are proposed for each individual dwelling unit that would be located adjacent to and accessible from the two -car garage for each unit. The potential for objectionable odors to emanate from the Project's refuse containers would be very slight and no different than the potential for refuse -related odors from other residential land uses in the City of Newport Beach. Therefore, impacts associated with odors would be less than significant. 5.4.3.3 Air Quality: Mitigation Measures MM AQ -1 Prior to grading permit issuance, the City shall verify that the following notes are included on the grading plan. Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with the notes and permit periodic inspection of the construction site by City of Newport Beach staff to confirm compliance. These notes also shall be specified in bid documents issued to perspective construction contractors. The following notes shall be included on the grading plan and in construction bid documents to implement SCAQMD Rule 403: • The construction contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project site are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three (3) times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. • The construction contractor shall ensure that all construction vehicles hauling earth materials or demolition debris use covers on any material to prevent the emission of dust during material transport. • Disturbed areas shall be replanted as soon as practical following grading, if such areas will not immediately be paved or covered with buildings. • The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on all unpaved surfaces of the Project site are reduced to IS miles per hour or less. MM AQ -2 Prior to grading permit issuance, the City shall verify that a note is included on the grading plan requiring a sign be posted on-site that restricts the idling of diesel engines to less than five minutes. The sign shall be installed before construction activities commence and remain in place during the duration of construction activities. Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with idling restriction and permit periodic inspection of the construction site by City of Newport Beach staff to confirm compliance. The idling restriction also shall be specified in bid documents issued to prospective construction contractors. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-35 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Implementation of Mitigation Measures MM AQ -1 and AQ -2 would ensure the Project -related construction activities are reduced to below the SCAQMD LSTs, and would reduce the Project's construction -related impacts to less -than -significant levels. 5.4.4 Biological Resources 5.4.4.1 Biological Resources: Environmental Setting Biological Resources Under existing conditions, the proposed Project site and surrounding land areas are fully developed with urban uses and do not contain sensitive biological resources. The vegetation that occurs on the Project site is ornamental in nature, including street trees and ornamental shrubs, groundcover, and vines growing on the existing buildings' faces and screen walls. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-36 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Would the Project Impact incorporated Impact Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on ❑ ❑ ❑ p federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement ❑ ❑ ❑ R1 of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impeded the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ❑ ❑ ❑ [JJ ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted ❑ ❑ ❑ EO Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? 5.4.4.1 Biological Resources: Environmental Setting Biological Resources Under existing conditions, the proposed Project site and surrounding land areas are fully developed with urban uses and do not contain sensitive biological resources. The vegetation that occurs on the Project site is ornamental in nature, including street trees and ornamental shrubs, groundcover, and vines growing on the existing buildings' faces and screen walls. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-36 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Council Policy G- I The City of Newport Beach City Council Policy G -I, Retention or Removal of City Trees, establishes requirements to ensure diversity in tree species and age classes within the City, and requires tree removal or reforestation to be approved by the City to ensure that tree removal requests do not adversely impact the overall inventory, diversity, or age of the City's Urban Forest. Approval for the removal and reforestation of trees can occur in conjunction with a City Council -approved neighborhood beautification program. Municipal Code Chapter 7.26 City of Newport Beach Municipal Code Chapter 7.26, Protection of Natural Habitat for Migratory and Other Waterfowl, is intended to maintain the value of natural habitat for migratory waterfowl and other birds such as ducks, gulls, terns, and pelicans. General Plan Policies Related to Biological Resources The following policies of the Newport Beach General Plan are applicable to biological resources: NR 10.1 Terrestrial and Marine Resource Protection. Cooperate with the state and federal resource protection agencies and private organizations to protect terrestrial and marine resources. NR 10.3 Analysis of Environmental Study Areas. Require a site-specific survey and analysis prepared by a qualified biologist as a filing requirement for any development permit applications where development would occur within or contiguous to areas identified as [Environmental Study Areas (ESAs)]. The proposed Project site is not located within or contiguous to any of the ESAs identified by the Newport Beach General Plan. Orange County Central and Coastal Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP) and Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) The Orange County Central and Coastal Orange County Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP) and Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) were completed in 1996, and the City of Newport Beach became a signatory agency in July of 1996. The purpose of the NCCP/HCP is to create a multi -species multi -habitat reserve system and implementation of a long-term management program that will protect primarily coastal sage scrub and the species that utilize this habitat. The NCCP/HCP focuses on multiple species and habitats and addresses conservation of these species on a regional context. The three main target species are the coastal California gnatcatcher, cactus wren, and orange -throated whiptail, in addition to 26 other species that are also identified and afforded management protection under the NCCP/HCP. An additional ten species of plants and animals that are either federally listed or treated as if they were listed according to FESA Section 10(a) also are addressed within the NCCP/HCP. The Project site and surrounding land areas are not targeted for conservation as part of the NCCP/HCP (Orange County, 1996, Figure 11). Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-37 No O❑ Mitigated Negative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Analysis 5.4.4.2 Biological Resources: Impact Analysis a) Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Finding: No Impact. The proposed Project would not have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the CDFW or USFWS. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. Improvements proposed as part of the Project would occur wholly within the 1.2 -acre Project site, along the site's frontage with surrounding streets, and within a portion of Via Lido (an improved roadway). None of the areas planned for physical impact or development by the Project contain species or habitat for species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Accordingly, no impact to sensitive species would occur. b) Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Finding: No Impact. The proposed Project would have no potential to impact riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the CDFW and USFWS. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. Improvements proposed as part of the Project would occur wholly within the 1.2 -acre Project site, along the site's frontage with surrounding streets, and within a portion of Via Lido (an improved roadway). None of the areas planned for physical impact or development by the Project contain riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the CDFW or USFWS. Additionally, and as concluded in Section 5.4.9, Project drainage would not result in any impacts to Newport Bay. Accordingly, no impact to riparian habitat would occur. c) Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Finding: No Impact. The proposed Project would have no impact on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Mitigation is not required. Areas planned for physical impact as part of the Project do not contain any wetlands; accordingly, the proposed Project would have no impact on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means. As indicated in Section 5.4.9 (Hydrology and Water Quality), under existing conditions, all drainage from the Project site flows off the site to the adjacent streets (Via Lido, Via Oporto, and Via Malaga), where the water is collected in surface gutters and conveyed to the north. Flows are then conveyed to an off-site catch basin where they are treated for water quality prior to discharge empty into the Newport Bay (C&V Consulting, 2013a, Section III.). Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-38 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, d) Would the Project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impeded the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Finding: No Impact. The proposed Project would not interfere with native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species movement, wildlife corridors, or native wildlife nursery sites. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. Under existing conditions, the Project site is developed with two buildings and a parking lot and is surrounded by improved roadways (Via Oporto, Via Lido, and Via Malaga) and urban development. Thus, under existing conditions, the Project site and adjacent properties do not provide habitat for native species, are not part of a terrestrial wildlife movement corridor, and do not serve as a native wildlife nursery site. Accordingly, implementation of the proposed Project would have no potential to interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or with the use of native wildlife nursery sites. e) Would the Project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Finding: No Impact. The proposed Project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. Implementation of the proposed Project would require the removal and replacement of existing street trees located along Via Lido, Via Oporto, and Via Malaga. Figure 2-3 depicts the existing street trees that would be removed as part of the Project, while Figure 3-8 depicts the proposed planting of trees. Pursuant to Council Policy G-1 provisions for "All Other City Trees," the City Council would review the Project's conceptual landscaping plan (including the removal of existing trees) during public hearings for the Project. Thus, Project approval by the City Council would assure consistency with Council Policy G- 1. The proposed Project site is fully developed under existing conditions, and therefore does not contain any natural habitat for migratory waterfowl or other birds, such as ducks, gulls, terns, and pelicans. Accordingly, development of the Project as proposed would not conflict with Municipal Code Chapter 7.26. The proposed Project site is not located within or contiguous to any of the ESAs identified by the Newport Beach General Plan; therefore, the Project does not require any site-specific biological surveys and analysis (Newport Beach, 2006a, Figure NR2). The proposed Project site also does not contain any terrestrial or marine resources that require protection, as the Project site is fully developed under existing conditions. Accordingly, with exception of the California Coastal Commission, which would review the Project for compliance with the California Coastal Act provisions related to marine and coastal biological resources (which would not be impacted by the Project), the Project would not involve nor require any consultation with state and federal resource protection agencies or private organizations concerned with the protection of sensitive biological resources. Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with General Plan Policies NR 10.1 or NR 10.3. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-39 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, There are no other local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources that are applicable to the proposed Project; accordingly, no impact due to a conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources would occur. f) Would the Project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Finding: No Impact. The proposed Project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan, including the Orange County Central and Coastal Orange County NCCP/HCP. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. The proposed Project site is located within the Orange County Central and Coastal Orange County NCCP/HCP, which does not identify the Project site and surrounding areas for conservation (Orange County, 1996, Figure 11). Due to the developed nature of the Project site, the site also does not contain any habitat for any of the plant or animal species addressed by the NCCP/HCP. Accordingly, the proposed Project has no potential to conflict with the NCCP/HCP. There are no additional Habitat Conservation Plans, Natural Community Conservation Plans, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plans applicable to the Project site or vicinity. Accordingly, no impact would occur. 5.4.4.3 Biological Resources: Mitigation Measures Implementation of the proposed Project would not impact biological resources; accordingly, mitigation measures are not required. 5.4.5 Cultural Resources 5.4.5.1 Cultural Resources: Environmental Setting Historical Resources Under existing conditions, the proposed Project site is occupied by two structures, a three-story commercial/office building and a one- and two-story church and church reading room. The church/church reading room structure exhibits Spanish -style architecture and was constructed in 1947, with additions made to the building in 1958 and 1966. The commercial office building was constructed in 1957 and consists of a three-story structure of modern architectural design typical in the decade Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-40 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Would the Project: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ❑ ❑ B ❑ significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ significance of an orchaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique ❑ ❑ ❑ paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ those interred outside of formal cemeteries? 5.4.5.1 Cultural Resources: Environmental Setting Historical Resources Under existing conditions, the proposed Project site is occupied by two structures, a three-story commercial/office building and a one- and two-story church and church reading room. The church/church reading room structure exhibits Spanish -style architecture and was constructed in 1947, with additions made to the building in 1958 and 1966. The commercial office building was constructed in 1957 and consists of a three-story structure of modern architectural design typical in the decade Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-40 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, following WWII. None of the existing buildings are listed in the National Register of Historic Places or on the California Register of Historical Resources. According to General Plan EIR Figure 4.4-1, the proposed Project site is not identified as containing any historical resources (Newport Beach, 2006b, Figure 4.4-1). Archaeological Resources The City of Newport Beach has a long cultural history and is known to have been home to Native American groups prior to settlement by Euro -Americans (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.4-15). The Project site is developed with urban uses and no archaeological resources are present on the surface of the property. Due to the developed nature of the Project site and past disturbance of the property's soils, the Project site is highly unlikely to contain any archaeological resources. Paleontological Resources The Project site is located on the Balboa Peninsula, which is not a portion of the City that is identified as having the potential to contain fossil -bearing soils or rock formations. Areas within the City and its sphere of influence (SOI) that are known to have a high likelihood of containing fossils include portions of the Vaqueros formation that underlie the Newport Coast, the Newport Banning Ranch portion of the SOI, the Topanga and Monterey Formations, and Fossil Canyon in the North Bluffs area. (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.4-17; PSI, Inc., 2012a) 5.4.5.2 Cultural Resources: Impact Analysis a) Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. Although the proposed Project would demolish and remove two existing buildings from the property, neither structure comprises a historical resources pursuant to § 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. No impact to historic resources would occur and mitigation is not required. The Project site contains two existing buildings that would be demolished and removed from the property as part of the Project. CEQA Guidelines § I5064.5(a) clarifies that historical resources include the following: I. A resource listed in, or determined to be eligible by the State Historical Resources Commission, for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources. 2. A resource included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in section 5020.1(k) of the Public Resources Code or identified as significant in an historical resource survey meeting the requirements [of] section 5024.1(g) of the Public Resources Code. 3. Any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which a lead agency determines to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California. The existing structures located on the Project site are not listed in the California Register of Historical Resources (Newport Beach, 2006b, Figure 4.4-1). In addition, pursuant to the criteria used by the California State Parks Office of Historic Preservation (OHP), the existing structures are not eligible for inclusion on the California Register of Historical Resources because: 1) they are not associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage; 2) they are not associated with the lives of persons important to local, California or national Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-41 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, history; 3) they do not embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction or represent the work of a master or possess high artistic values; and 4) they have not yielded, nor do they have the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation. The existing structures also are not included in any local register of historical resources, nor are they identified as significant in any historical resource surveys (Newport Beach, 2006b, Figure 4.4-1). Moreover, the existing structures are not historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California; rather, the structures consists of relatively modern and common post WWII architectural styles and exhibit no unique architectural characteristics. There are no other structures on-site that could be considered a historical resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §I5064.5(a). Based on the foregoing analysis, the existing structures and features on the site are not historical resources. Thus, the proposed Project would have a less -than -significant impact to historic resources as defined by CEQA Guidelines § I5064.5(a) and mitigation is not required. b) Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? Finding: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Although unlikely, there is a remote possibility that archaeological resources could be encountered during site grading activities. Mitigation Measure MM CR -1 would ensure that impacts to archaeological resources, if unearthed during construction activities, are reduced to a level below significance. The Project site is fully disturbed and developed with a commercial/office building, church/church reading room, and a parking lot. The Balboa Peninsula was once the site of extensive low sand dunes but has experienced modification. The Balboa Peninsula, a barrier beach that protects the bay, was formed between 1825 and 1862 with essentially nonnative soils and/or artificial fill. These areas were modified significantly during the past century in order to deepen channels for navigation and to form habitable islands. Furthermore, the area is not listed as an area that has yielded archaeological resources. Although grading associated with the proposed Project would be minimal, the Project's geotechnical engineer (Professional Service Industries, Inc.) recommends over -excavating the site to a depth of at least two feet below existing or finished grade, whichever is deeper. Although unlikely, there is a remote possibility that archaeological resources could be encountered during site grading activities. If significant resources are unearthed, they could be significantly impacted if not appropriately treated. This is a potentially significant impact and mitigation is required. c) Would the Project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Finding: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Although unlikely, there is a remote possibility that paleontological resources could be encountered during site grading activities. Mitigation Measure MM CR -2 would ensure that impacts to paleontological resources, if unearthed during construction activities, are reduced to a level below significance. The Project site is fully disturbed under existing conditions and is developed with a commercial office building, church/church reading room, and parking lot. As such, no unique geologic features or surficial Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-42 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, paleontological resources are located on the property. Additionally, the Project site is not located in a portion of the City of Newport Beach that is known to contain fossil -bearing soils or rock formations (Newport Beach, 2006b, P. 4.4-17; PSI, Inc., 2012a). However, there is still a remote potential that paleontological resources could be discovered beneath the surface of the site during site grading activities. Although unlikely, the potential for uncovering and impacting paleontological resources during site grading activities represents a potentially significant impact for which mitigation is required. d) Would the Project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. In the remote event that Project construction activities unearth human remains, mandatory compliance with California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) would reduce the potential impact to below a level of significance. Mitigation is not required. The proposed Project site is fully developed with a commercial office building, church/church reading room, and parking lot. The Project site is not known to have ever been used as a cemetery and the possibility of uncovering human remains during site grading activities is remote. Regardless, in the unlikely event that human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b), remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made by the Coroner. If the Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) must be contacted and the NAHC must then immediately notify the "most likely descendant(s)" of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. Mandatory compliance with these policies would ensure that potential impacts associated with the discovery of human remains would be less than significant. 5.4.5.3 Cultural Resources: Mitigation Measures Mitigation for Potential Impacts to Archaeological Resources MM CR -I Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the City shall verify that the following note is included on the grading plan(s). "If suspected archaeological resources are encountered during ground - disturbing construction activities, the construction contractor shall temporarily halt work in a 100 -foot radius around the find until a qualified archaeologist can be called to the site to assess the significance of the find, and, if necessary, develop appropriate treatment measures in consultation with the City of Newport Beach." The grading contractor shall be responsible for complying with the note. If the archaeologist determines that the find does not meet the CEQA standards of cultural significance, construction shall be permitted to proceed. However, if the archaeologist determines that further information is needed to evaluate significance, the City of Newport Beach shall be notified and a data recovery plan shall be prepared in consultation with the City, which may include the implementation of a Phase II and/or III archaeological investigation per City guidelines. All significant cultural resources recovered shall be documented on California Department of Parks and Recreation Site Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-43 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Forms to be filed with the California Historical Resources Information System, South Central Coastal Information Center (CHRIS-SCCIC). The archaeologist shall incorporate analysis and interpretation of any significant find(s) into a final Phase IV report that identifies the level of significance pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21083.2(G). The Project Applicant, in consultation with the archaeologist and the City, shall designate repositories in the event that resources are recovered. Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM CR -I would reduce the Project's potential impacts to archaeological resources to below a level of significance. Mitigation for Potential Impacts to Paleontological Resources MM CR -2 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the City shall verify that the following note is included on the grading plan(s). "if suspected paleontological resources (fossils) are encountered during ground - disturbing construction activities, the construction contractor shall temporarily halt ground -disturbing activities within 100 feet of the find until a qualified paleontologist can be called to the site to assess the significance of the find, and, if necessary, develop appropriate treatment measures in consultation with the City of Newport Beach." The grading contractor shall be responsible for complying with the note. At the paleontologist's discretion, the construction contractor may assist in removing rock samples for initial processing. If the paleontologist determines that the find is not unique, construction shall be permitted to proceed. However, if the paleontologist determines that further information is needed to evaluate significance, the City of Newport Beach shall be notified and a treatment plan shall be prepared and implemented in consultation with the City to protect the identified paleontological resource(s) from damage and destruction. Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM CR -2 would reduce the Project's potential impacts to paleontological resources to below a level of significance. 5.4.6 Geology and Soils Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact a) Expose people or structures to ❑ ❑ R1 ❑ potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a (mown ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-44 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, 5.4.6.1 Geology and Soils: Environmental Setting Regional Geology and Seismicity The proposed Project site is located within the Orange County coastal plain and is underlain by Quaternary alluvial and fluvial sedimentary deposits. As with much of the Southern California region, the Project site is located in an area subject to seismic hazards, with the nearest known fault (Newport - Inglewood Fault Zone) occurring approximately 0.4 mile to the northwest of the Project site. The Project site is not located in an Earthquake Fault Zone per the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone Map. (PSI, Inc., 2012a, pp. 2-6) Lurching and Shallow Ground Rupture Breaking of the ground surface caused by active faulting is not likely to occur on the Project site because there are no known active fault traces within the Project site's boundaries (PSI, Inc., 2012a, p. 6). Groundwater The Projects geotechnical consultant (Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI)) drilled four borings on the site and measured groundwater at approximately 5 -feet below existing grade in all four borings, which is consistent with documented high groundwater depths in the area. Based on a review of the California Geological Survey (CGS) Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Newport Quadrangle, the historic high groundwater depth for the site area is noted to be about 5 feet below grade. It is possible that seasonal variations (temperature, rainfall, tide conditions etc.) will cause fluctuations in the groundwater level. (PSI, Inc., 2012a, p. 4) Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-45 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Would the Project: impact incorporated Impact Impact Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground ❑ ❑ Q ❑ shaking? iii) Seismic -related ground failure, ❑ ❑ Q ❑ including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the ❑ ❑ Q ❑ loss of topsoil? C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil ❑ ❑ Z ❑ that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 in Table 18- I -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 supporting the use septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? 5.4.6.1 Geology and Soils: Environmental Setting Regional Geology and Seismicity The proposed Project site is located within the Orange County coastal plain and is underlain by Quaternary alluvial and fluvial sedimentary deposits. As with much of the Southern California region, the Project site is located in an area subject to seismic hazards, with the nearest known fault (Newport - Inglewood Fault Zone) occurring approximately 0.4 mile to the northwest of the Project site. The Project site is not located in an Earthquake Fault Zone per the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone Map. (PSI, Inc., 2012a, pp. 2-6) Lurching and Shallow Ground Rupture Breaking of the ground surface caused by active faulting is not likely to occur on the Project site because there are no known active fault traces within the Project site's boundaries (PSI, Inc., 2012a, p. 6). Groundwater The Projects geotechnical consultant (Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI)) drilled four borings on the site and measured groundwater at approximately 5 -feet below existing grade in all four borings, which is consistent with documented high groundwater depths in the area. Based on a review of the California Geological Survey (CGS) Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Newport Quadrangle, the historic high groundwater depth for the site area is noted to be about 5 feet below grade. It is possible that seasonal variations (temperature, rainfall, tide conditions etc.) will cause fluctuations in the groundwater level. (PSI, Inc., 2012a, p. 4) Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-45 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Liquefaction -Induced Settlement According to the CGS Newport 7.5' Quadrangle hazard map, the Project site is located within an area that is classified as being susceptible to liquefaction and has a historic high groundwater depth of approximately 5 feet below the existing ground surface elevation. (PSI, Inc., 2012a, p. 6) Liquefaction and seismically induced settlement typically occur in loose granular and low -plastic silt and clay soils with groundwater near the ground surface. During an earthquake, ground shaking causes the soil to consolidate and increases the pore pressures in saturated soils. After dissipation of the excess pore pressures, the saturated soils tend to settle. Fine-grained plastic soils are generally not susceptible to liquefaction or to short-term settlement due to seismic loads. (PSI, Inc., 2012a, p. 6) In order to evaluate the potential for soil liquefaction at the Project site, PSI performed an analysis utilizing the LIQUEFYPRO computer software program, assuming a groundwater depth of 5 feet (historic high), the soil profile identified during site borings conducted by PSI, and a ground acceleration of 0.5g (SDS/2.5, as per the CBC). The results of this analysis indicates that localized zones of the silty sand soils present on the Project site are potentially susceptible to liquefaction during seismic events. PSI concluded that the sandy soils on the site at depths between about 7'/2 to 10 feet, 26 to 28 feet, and 29 to 30 feet below grade are potentially susceptible to liquefaction upon application of a design earthquake. (PSI, Inc., 2012a, pp. 6-7) The most substantial effect of soil liquefaction is expected to be ground surface settlement resulting from volumetric strain within the liquefiable soils. Based on the analysis, a maximum total seismic induced settlement of approximately 1-'/4 inches is estimated with a % inch of differential settlement across a 40 foot span. (PSI, Inc., 2012a, p. 7) Landslidin¢ Due to the generally flat nature of the site and surrounding properties, the Project site is not susceptible to landslides (PSI, Inc., 2012a, p. 7). Soil Erosion Under existing conditions, the Project site is fully developed and is occupied by two existing buildings and a parking lot. As the Project site is fully covered with the existing structures, pavement, and landscaping, no measurable soil erosion occurs under existing conditions. 5.4.6.2 Geology and Soils: Impact Analysis a) Would the Project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving. i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. With mandatory compliance to the California Building Code and recommendations of a site-specific geotechnical evaluation, the proposed Project would not significantly expose people or structures to potential substantial Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-46 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, strong seismic ground shaking, seismic -related ground failure (including liquefaction), and landslides. Impacts would be less than significant and mitigation is not required. Earthquake Fault Rupture The proposed Project site is not located within any Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones and no known faults underlie the site. The nearest fault to the Project site is the Newport -Inglewood Fault Zone, which occurs approximately 0.4 mile northwest of the Project site. Accordingly, the property would not rupture during a seismic event. As such, the Project would not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, and no impact would occur. Seismic Ground Shakine As with much of the Southern California region, the Project site is located in a seismically active area. The existing buildings on the Project site are subject to ground shaking during seismic events and the proposed Project's buildings would be subject to seismic shaking as well. Therefore, the Project has the potential to expose people or structures to adverse effects associated with seismic events. The buildings that would be constructed on the property would be required to comply with the California Building Code (CBC), which requires compliance with special structural design standards to attenuate hazards associated with credible seismic ground shaking events that are anticipated in the Project area. A site-specific analysis, based on the CBC requirements, was conducted as part of the Project's geotechnical evaluation (Technical Appendix B). The geotechnical evaluation also incorporates site- specific recommendations to attenuate seismic hazards at the site in accordance with the CBC requirements and standards. Compliance with applicable requirements of the CBC and the specifications listed in the site-specific geotechnical evaluation would be assured through future City review of grading and building permits, which would ensure that strong seismic ground shaking effects are attenuated. As such, impacts would be less than significant and mitigation is not required. Seismic -Related Ground Failure (Liquefaction) The Project site is located in an area that is subject to potential liquefaction hazards, primarily due to ground settlement that would result from seismic events. Based on a site-specific analysis conducted by the Project's geotechnical engineer (PSI), a maximum total seismic induced settlement of approximately 1-'/. inches with an estimated % inch of differential settlement across a 40 foot span would occur on the Project site. Based on this low magnitude of estimated settlement, PSI concluded that mitigation of the liquefaction potential is not warranted. (PSI, Inc., 2012a, p. 7) Accordingly, impacts due to seismic - related ground failure (including liquefaction) represent a less -than -significant impact and mitigation is not required. Landslides The proposed Project site has no potential to be affected by landslides due to the generally flat nature of the site and surrounding areas (PSI, Inc., 2012a, p. 7). Accordingly, there would be no impact due to the potential for landslide hazards. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-47 ME O❑ Mitigated Negative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Analysis b) Would the Project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The proposed Project would not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil during construction or long-term operation. Accordingly, impacts would be less than significant and mitigation is not required. Construction -Related Activities Proposed demolition and grading activities associated with the Project would temporarily expose underlying soils to water and air, which would increase erosion susceptibility while the soils are exposed. The property is generally flat, so erosion potential would not be substantial compared to sites with exposed soils on slopes. Regardless, exposed soils would be subject to erosion during rainfall events or high winds due to the removal of structures, pavement, and/or stabilizing vegetation and exposure of these erodible materials to wind and water. Erosion by water would be greatest during the first rainy season after grading and before the Project's structure foundations are established and paving and landscaping occur. Erosion by wind would be highest during periods of high wind speeds when soils are exposed. Pursuant to the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board, the Project Applicant is required to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for construction activities. The NPDES permit is required for all projects that include construction activities, such as clearing, grading, and/or excavation that disturb at least one acre of total land area. Additionally, during grading and other construction activities involving soil exposure or the transport of earth materials, Chapter 15.10 (Excavation and Grading Code) of the City of Newport Beach, which establishes requirements for the control of dust and erosion during construction, would apply to the Project (Newport Beach, 2012a, § 15.10). As part of the requirements of Chapter 15.10 (Excavation and Grading Code), the Project Applicant would be required to prepare an erosion control plan that would address construction fencing, sand bags, and other erosion -control features that would be implemented during the construction phase to reduce the site's potential for soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. Requirements for the reduction of particulate matter in the air also would apply, pursuant to SCAQMD Rule 403. Mandatory compliance to the Project's NPDES permit and these regulatory requirements would ensure that water and wind erosion impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation is not required. Long -Term Operational Activities Following construction, wind and water erosion on the Project site would be minimized, as the areas disturbed during construction would be landscaped or covered with impervious surfaces. Only nominal areas of exposed soil, if any, would occur in the site's landscaped areas. The only potential for erosion effects to occur during Project operation would be indirect effects from storm water discharged from the property. The Project's storm water is proposed to be collected by gutters within existing streets (Via Lido, Via Oporto, and Via Malaga), which would convey the water to an existing off-site catch basin as occurs under existing conditions. No increased erosion effects would occur because the Project would not increase the volume or velocity of water discharged from the site. A Project -specific Hydrology Report is included in Appendix C. As concluded in the Hydrology Report, the proposed Project would reduce impervious areas on the site from 96% (as occurs under existing conditions) to approximately 89%, thereby resulting in a longer runoff length that results in a longer runoff time of concentration (C&V Consulting, 2013a). As a result, the Project would reduce the runoff rate and volume as compared to the existing condition, which would reduce any siltation or erosional effects associated with water discharge. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-48 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, In addition, the Project Applicant is required to prepare and submit to the City for approval a Project - specific Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). The SWPPP and WQMP must identify and implement an effective combination of erosion control and sediment control measures (i.e., Best Management Practices) to reduce or eliminate discharge to surface water from storm water and non -storm water discharges. Adherence to the requirements noted in the Project's required WQMP (refer to Technical Appendix D) and site-specific SWPPP would further ensure that potential erosion and sedimentation effects would be less than significant. c) Would the Project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in on- or of -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. Considering mandatory compliance with the CBC requirements and the recommendations of the site-specific geotechnical evaluation, the proposed Project would not be subjected to unstable soil conditions that could result in on- or off-site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, and collapse. Impacts would be less than significant and mitigation is not required. Liquefaction hazards and landslides are addressed above under the discussion and analysis of Geology and Soils Threshold I, and impacts due to landslides and liquefaction were determined to be less than significant. Based on the analysis conducted by PSI, settlement of the site is estimated to be less than two-thirds of an inch following grading. Although such settlement has the potential to affect building foundations, the site-specific geotechnical report (Technical Appendix B) incorporates design measures to attenuate potential damage from settlement of the supporting subgrade. Compliance with the recommendations contained in the site-specific geotechnical evaluation would be assured through future City review of building and grading permits, and would reduce impacts due to potential ground subsidence or collapse to a level below significance. (PSI, Inc., 2012a, pp. 10-12) In addition, the site-specific geotechnical evaluation does not identify any hazards at the site associated with lateral spreading (PSI, Inc., 2012a). Based on the foregoing analysis, and assuming mandatory compliance with the CBC requirements and the recommendations of the site-specific geotechnical evaluation, the proposed Project would result in less -than -significant impacts due to unstable soil conditions that could result in on- or off-site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, and collapse. d) Would the Project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- I -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Finding: No Impact. The Project would not be subject to substantial risks to life or property associated with expansive soils. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. On-site soil testing conducted by the Project geotechnical engineer (PSI) (Technical Appendix B) concludes that the near surface soils at the site have a very low expansion potential (PSI, Inc., 2012a, p. 5). Accordingly, the Project would not create a substantial risk to life or property associated with expansive soils, and no impact would occur. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-49 ME O❑ Mitigated Negative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Analysis e) Would the Project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Finding: No Impact. No septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems are located on the site or proposed as part of the Project; accordingly, no impact due to soils incapable of supporting such systems have the potential to occur. Mitigation is not required. As occurs on the Project site under existing conditions, the proposed Project is required to be served by the City's existing sanitary sewer system. No septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems are proposed as part of the Project; accordingly, no impact would occur. 5.4.6.3 Geology and Soils: Mitigation Measures Implementation of the proposed Project would result in no impacts or less -than -significant impacts due to geology and soil conditions. Assuming mandatory compliance with the CBC, recommendations of the Project's site-specific geotechnical report, and City of Newport Beach requirements, mitigation measures are not required. 5.4.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either ❑ ❑ Q ❑ directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? 5.4.7.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Environmental Setting Existing Site Conditions Under existing conditions, the proposed Project site is occupied by a church/church reading room and commercial office building. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions associated with these existing uses are primarily associated with vehicular traffic (tailpipe emissions from vehicles traveling to and from the property), although energy consumption, water consumption, and solid waste generation by the existing uses also contribute to the site's GHG emissions. Table 5-8, Existing and Proposed GHG Emission Sources, presented later in this section, provides an estimate of the existing traffic, energy consumption, water consumption, and solid waste generation emissions associated with the site's existing land uses. Background A greenhouse gas is a gas that has the ability to absorb infrared radiation or heat. For the purposes of this analysis the three main greenhouse gases are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N20). Other GHG's include sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), hydrofluorocarbons (HFC's), and perflourocarbons (PFC's). Each gas has different abilities to absorb heat and different lifetimes within the atmosphere. A global warming potential (GWP) is assigned to each GHG based on its relative strength compared to CO2. The global warming potential of CH4 is 21 CO2 equivalents (CO2e), N20 is 310 CO2e, SF6 is 23,900 CO2e, and HFCs and PFCs have a range of GWPs. Total GHG emissions are Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-50 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, calculated in CO2e. Many human activities, such as the combustion of fossil fuels, are known to release these gases into the atmosphere. The heat absorbing ability of GHGs enables them, theoretically, to affect the Earth's heat balance. Climate is in large part regulated by the Earth's heat balance; therefore a substantial amount of GHGs released by human activities may cause changes to the climate of Earth. (EPA, 2013) Regulatory Setting The proposed Project would be required to comply with all mandatory regulatory requirements imposed by the State of California and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) aimed at the reduction of air quality pollutant emissions. Those that are applicable to the Project and that would assist in the reduction of GHG emissions are as follows: • Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32) • Regional GHG Emissions Reduction Targets/Sustainable Communities Strategies (SB 375) • Pavley Fuel Efficiency Standards (AB 1493). Establishes fuel efficiency ratings for new vehicles. • Title 24 California Code of Regulations (California Building Code). Establishes energy efficiency requirements for new construction. • Title 20 California Code of Regulations (Appliance Energy Efficiency Standards). Establishes energy efficiency requirements for appliances. • Title 17 California Code of Regulations (Low Carbon Fuel Standard). Requires carbon content of fuel sold in California to be 10% less by 2020. • California Water Conservation in Landscaping Act of 2006 (AB 1881). Requires local agencies to adopt the Department of Water Resources updated Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance or equivalent by January I, 2010 to ensure efficient landscapes in new development and reduced water waste in existing landscapes. • Statewide Retail Provider Emissions Performance Standards (SB 1368). Requires energy generators to achieve performance standards for GHG emissions. • Renewable Portfolio Standards (SB 1078). Requires electric corporations to increase the amount of energy obtained from eligible renewable energy resources to 20 percent by 2010 and 33 percent by 2020. • City of Newport Beach General Plan. The City's General Plan, adopted in 2006, includes policies that, although not specifically addressing GHG emissions, would serve to reduce emissions of GHGs. These policies, primarily contained in the Natural Resources Element, address water supply, air quality, open space, and energy. The Circulation Element also includes policies to achieve reduced automobile travel. Project compliance with applicable General Plan policies would be mandatory, and would serve to reduce the Project's emissions of GHGs. Activities associated with the Project would be required to comply with the above -listed measures; therefore, emissions reductions associated with these measures can be assumed as part of the proposed Project Discussion on Establishment of Significance Thresholds The direct impacts of Project -related emissions on climate change and global warming cannot be determined based on available science. There is no evidence in scientific literature that would indicate that the air emissions from a project the size of the proposed Project (redevelopment of a 1.2 -acre property with 23 townhouses) would directly or indirectly affect global climate change. Accordingly, the Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-51 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, analysis herein evaluates the Project's potential to result in cumulatively considerable emissions of GHGs that could contribute to climate change. Currently, there are no adopted thresholds for GHG emissions for projects within the SCAQMD region. However, SCAQMD has convened a Working Group to identify GHG thresholds for use in the SCAB for projects where SCAQMD is serving as the Lead Agency. The draft threshold indicates that for projects that are not exempt or where no qualifying GHG reduction plans are directly applicable, an assessment of GHG emissions is required. SCAQMD is considering a screening level threshold of 3,000 metric tons (MTons) of CO2e annually for all land use types, including residential uses. This threshold is based on a review of the Governor's Office of Planning and Research database of CEQA projects. Based on their review, 90 percent of CEQA projects would exceed 3,000 MTons per year. Projects that exceed the screening threshold would require additional technical analysis to determine the level of significance. The City of Newport Beach relies upon the SCAQMD draft screening level threshold; therefore, for purposes of analysis herein, the proposed Project may have a significant adverse impact on GHG emissions if it would result in any of the following: I. Generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment, based on any applicable threshold of significance. A potentially significant impact would occur if the project exceeds the SCAQMD's 3,000 MTCO2e per year screening threshold. 2. Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases, such as AB 32's Scoping Plan. 5.4.7.2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Impact Analysis a) Would the Project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The proposed Project would result in a net decrease of air emissions as compared to existing conditions. Therefore, the Project would result in GHG emissions that are below the City of Newport Beach's screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons of CO2e per year. Based on the City's interim threshold of significance for the evaluation of GHG emissions, the Project's emissions of GHGs would be less -than -significant and mitigation is not required. GHG emissions associated with the proposed Project would primarily be associated with Project - related traffic. In addition, Project -related construction activities, energy consumption, water consumption, and solid waste generation also would contribute to the Project's overall generation of GHG gasses. Under existing conditions the Project site is occupied by commercial office and church/church reading room land uses, which generate GHGs. Therefore, in order to evaluate the net change in GHG emissions that would be associated with Project implementation, it is necessary to compare the site's existing GHG emissions to those that would occur under the proposed Project. Table 5-8, Existing and Proposed GHG Emission Sources, presents a comparison of GHG emission sources associated with the site's existing uses to those that would occur under the proposed Project. As shown, implementation of the proposed Project would result in a 69% net reduction of average daily vehicle trips (ADT) as compared with the existing uses; a 45.7% net reduction in energy consumption; a 45.7% net reduction in water consumption; and a 66.9% net reduction in solid waste generation. It should be noted that the existing conditions data in Table 5-8 does not account for the existing church's Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-52 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Table 5-8 Existing and Proposed GHG Emission Sources I. Commercial Office employee rates obtained from the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Employment Density Study (SCAG, 2001), which estimates that low-rise office uses generate one employee per 352 s.f. 2. Information for employment density for church land uses is not available. Calculations that rely on employment/population exclude data for the existing church uses. 3. Residential population estimates assume 2.19 persons per multifamily dwelling unit, consistent with the Newport Beach General Plan EIR (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.10-3). 4. Refer to Technical Appendix F for trip generation calculations. 5. Source: United States Energy Information Administration (USEIA, 2010). 6. Source: City of Newport Beach 2010 Urban Water Management Plan (Newport Beach, 201 1a, p. 2). 7. Solid Waste generation estimates derived from Newport Beach General Plan EIR (Newport Beach, 2006b, Table 4.14-14). Notes: ADT = Average Daily Trips (traffic); du = dwelling units; Btu = British thermal units; yr = year; emp. = employees; gpd = gallons per day. use of energy or water; thus, the data in Table 5-8 represents a conservative comparison of the Project's emissions as compared to existing conditions. Since the emission sources presented in Table 5-8 (particularly ADT) are responsible for GHG emissions that are associated with both the existing and proposed land uses at the site, it is concluded that implementation of the proposed Project would result in a substantial reduction in the amount of GHG emissions associated with the Project site as compared Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-53 Traffic' Existing Land Uses Commercial Office 32,469 s.f. 92 emp. 0.0 1 101 ADT per s.f. 357ADT Church 8,961 s.f. 0.00911 ADT per s.f. 82 ADT Total Traffic (Existing Land Uses): 439 ADT Proposed Land Uses Multifamily Residential 23 du 50 persons 5.81 ADT/du 34 ADT Net Change in Traffic with Project Implementation: -305 ADT Energy Consumption Existing Land Uses Commercial Office 32,469 s.f. 92 emp. 210 million Btu/year/capita' 19,320 Btu/yr Church 8,961 s.f. I -- Subtotal - Energy Consumption (Existing Land Uses): 19,320 Btulyr Proposed Land Uses Multifamily Residential 23 du 50 persons 1 210 million Btu/year/capita 10,500 Btu/yr Net Change in Energy Consumption with Project Implementation: -8,820 Btulyr Water Consumption Existing Land Uses Commercial Office 32,469 s.f. 92 emp. 228.1 gpd/capita' 20,985 gpd Church 8,961 s.f. Subtotal- Water Consumption (Existing Land Uses): 20,985 gpd Proposed Land Uses Multifamily Residential 23 du 50 persons 228.1 gpd/capita 1 1,405 gpd Net Change in Water Consumption with Project Implementation: -9,580 gpd Solid Waste Generation Existing Land Uses Commercial Office 32,469 s.f. 92 emp. I Ib/100 s.f./day 324.7 lbs/day Church 8,961 s.f. 0.00716/s.f./day 120.716'/day Subtotal - Solid Waste Consumption (Existing Land Uses): 445.4 Ibslday Proposed Land Uses Multifamily Residential 23 du 50 persons 6.41 lbs/unit/day 147.4 Ibs/day Net Change in Solid Waste Generation with Project Implementation: -298.0 Ibslday I. Commercial Office employee rates obtained from the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Employment Density Study (SCAG, 2001), which estimates that low-rise office uses generate one employee per 352 s.f. 2. Information for employment density for church land uses is not available. Calculations that rely on employment/population exclude data for the existing church uses. 3. Residential population estimates assume 2.19 persons per multifamily dwelling unit, consistent with the Newport Beach General Plan EIR (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.10-3). 4. Refer to Technical Appendix F for trip generation calculations. 5. Source: United States Energy Information Administration (USEIA, 2010). 6. Source: City of Newport Beach 2010 Urban Water Management Plan (Newport Beach, 201 1a, p. 2). 7. Solid Waste generation estimates derived from Newport Beach General Plan EIR (Newport Beach, 2006b, Table 4.14-14). Notes: ADT = Average Daily Trips (traffic); du = dwelling units; Btu = British thermal units; yr = year; emp. = employees; gpd = gallons per day. use of energy or water; thus, the data in Table 5-8 represents a conservative comparison of the Project's emissions as compared to existing conditions. Since the emission sources presented in Table 5-8 (particularly ADT) are responsible for GHG emissions that are associated with both the existing and proposed land uses at the site, it is concluded that implementation of the proposed Project would result in a substantial reduction in the amount of GHG emissions associated with the Project site as compared Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-53 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, to existing conditions. Specifically, and based on the data presented in Table 5-8, it is conservatively estimated that implementation of the proposed Project would reduce the operational -related GHG emissions at the site by a minimum of 45.7% as compared to existing conditions. Although the data in Table 5-8 does not account for temporary emissions that would occur during Project construction, construction -related emissions represent a minor component of a project's overall GHG emissions (SCAQMD, 2008a, p. 42). Furthermore, construction -related emissions would occur only over a short duration, and would cease upon completion of construction activities (which for the Project are estimated to last approximately 24 months). Additionally, the GHG emissions associated with construction activities would not result in a net increase in GHG emissions from the site as compared to existing conditions, when considered in context with the substantial reduction in operational emissions due to traffic, water consumption, energy consumption, and solid waste generation. This is due, in part, to the way that GHG emissions are estimated, wherein construction emissions are amortized over a 30 -year project lifetime pursuant to the recommendations of the SCAQMD (SCAQMD, 2008a, p. 42). Based on the foregoing analysis, it is concluded that the proposed Project would result in a net reduction in GHG emissions as compared to existing conditions, because the Project would result in a substantial reduction in traffic generation, energy consumption, water consumption, and solid waste generation as compared to the site's existing uses. Accordingly, the Project would result in GHG emissions that are below the City of Newport Beach's screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons of CO2e per year. Based on the City's interim threshold of significance for the evaluation of GHG emissions, the Project's emissions of GHGs is a less -than -significant impact and a detailed technical study is not required. b) Would the Project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Finding: No Impact. The proposed Project would comply with all applicable plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions; accordingly, no impact due to a conflict with any plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions would occur. Mitigation is not required. As indicated in the discussion and analysis of Threshold I under Greenhouse Gas Emissions, above, the proposed Project would generate GHG emissions below the interim significance thresholds established by the City of Newport Beach for evaluating the significance of a project's GHG emissions. Additionally, activities associated with the Project would be subject to all applicable federal, state, and regional requirements adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions, including, but not limited to: AB 32; SB 375; AB 1493; Titles 17, 20, and 24 of the California Code of Regulations; AB 1881; SB 1368; SB 1078; and the applicable policies of the City's General Plan that reduce GHG emissions. There are no other plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions that are applicable to the Project area; therefore, the proposed Project would have no potential to conflict with such plans, policies, or regulations. Accordingly, no impact would occur. 5.4.7.3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Mitigation Measures Implementation of the proposed Project would result in no impacts or less -than -significant impacts due to GHG emissions; therefore, mitigation measures would not be required. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-54 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, 5.4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 5.4.8.1 Hazards and Hazardous Materials: Environmental Setting Existing Environmental Site Conditions Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) for the Project site (Technical Appendix EI) to evaluate whether the Project site contains any recognized environmental conditions (RECs) under existing conditions that could affect human health or the environment. Based on the results of this analysis, it was determined that the site is adjacent to an existing dry cleaning operation located northwest and adjacent to the site. The dry cleaning operation was considered to comprise a potential REC under existing conditions. (PSI, Inc., 2012b, pp. 1-2) Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-55 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Would the Project: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact G) Create a significant hazard to the public ❑ RI ❑ ❑ or the environment through routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public ❑ 21 ❑ ❑ or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle ❑ ❑ ❑ hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a ❑ ❑ ❑ Q list of hazardous materials sites which complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project within an airport land use ❑ ❑ Q ❑ plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 0 For a project within the vicinity of a private ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a ❑ ❑ [j ❑ significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? 5.4.8.1 Hazards and Hazardous Materials: Environmental Setting Existing Environmental Site Conditions Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) for the Project site (Technical Appendix EI) to evaluate whether the Project site contains any recognized environmental conditions (RECs) under existing conditions that could affect human health or the environment. Based on the results of this analysis, it was determined that the site is adjacent to an existing dry cleaning operation located northwest and adjacent to the site. The dry cleaning operation was considered to comprise a potential REC under existing conditions. (PSI, Inc., 2012b, pp. 1-2) Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-55 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, However, based on the results of a Phase 11 Environmental Site Assessment (Phase 11 ESA) that was also conducted by PSI, the Project site does not contain any concentrations of chlorinated solvents above the laboratory reporting limit or regulatory limit; accordingly, potential contamination associated with the dry cleaning operation does not represent a REC, and no further analysis or remediation is required (PSI, Inc., 2013, p. 3). Additionally, based on the results of the Phase I ESA, it was concluded that the proposed Project site is not identified as a hazardous materials site in any regulatory databases, thereby indicating that the site is not included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 (PSI, Inc., 2012b, pp. 17-18). Asbestos Containing Materials Asbestos is a carcinogen and is categorized as a hazardous air pollutant by the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Federal asbestos requirements are found in National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) within the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 40, Part 61, Subpart M, and are enforced in the Project area by the SCAQMD. In conformance with the NESHAP, AQMD Rule 1403 adopted by the SCAQMD on October 6, 1989, establishes survey requirements, notification, and work practice requirements to prevent asbestos emissions from emanating during building renovation and demolition activities. Rule 1403 requires the inspection, identification, and quantification of all friablez, Class 1, and Class 11 non -friable ACMs. Class I non -friable ACMs are materials containing more than 1% asbestos, and that when dry, can be broken, crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder in the course of demolition or renovation activities. Class 11 non -friable ACMs include all other material containing more than 1% asbestos that is neither friable nor Class I nonfriable. (SCAQMD, 2013) If ACMs are present, then Rule 1403 requires notification of the SCAQMD prior to commencing any demolition or renovation activities. Notification includes, but is not limited to, the following: time schedule for demolition activities; description of work practices and engineering controls to be used to comply with Rule 1403; name and location of the waste disposal site where asbestos containing waste materials (ACWM) will be deposited; identification of remediation actions to be undertaken in the event that ACMs become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder. Rule 1403 also sets forth specific procedures for the removal of asbestos, and requires that an on-site representative trained in the requirements of Rule 1403 be present during the stripping, removing, handling, or disturbing of ACM. (SCAQMD, 2013) Additionally, the California Department of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) considers a material to be asbestos -containing construction material (ACCM) if at least one sample is determined to contain asbestos in an amount greater than one-tenth of one percent (>O.1 %). Asbestos studies were conducted by PSI for the existing commercial office building and church/church reading room building pursuant to the survey requirements of AQMD Rule 1403. The assessments were conducted to determine whether the buildings contain asbestos -containing materials (ACMs). The assessment of potential ACMs is contained in Technical Appendices E3 and E4 for the commercial office building and church building, respectively. Of the 214 samples of materials collected by PSI at the commercial office building, laboratory testing results indicated detectable levels of asbestos (including friable ACMs) in flooring, mastic, smooth plaster lid, plaster ceiling, joint compound, roof mastic, 2 NESHAP defines a friable ACM as any material containing more than one percent asbestos that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure (PSI, Inc., 2012c, Section 4). Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-56 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Sprayed -On -Acoustic (SOA) plaster, and SOA drywall ceilings. Of the 81 samples of material collected by PSI at the church building, laboratory testing indicated detectable levels of asbestos in roof flashing, roof mastic, joint compound, air cell debris, 9 -inch floor tile and associated mastic, mudded joint/ceiling, white sheet flooring and associated mastic, beige 12" floor tile and associated mastic, brown mastic, and acoustic ceiling. (PSI, Inc., 2012c, Section I; PSI, Inc., 2012d, Section 1) Lead Federal efforts to regulate components painted with lead-based paint (LBP) began with the enactment of the Lead -Based Paint Poison Prevention Act (LBPPPA) in 1971. In 1973, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) defined lead-based paint as paint having lead content equal to or greater than 0.5 percent by weight in a dry film of newly applied paint. In 1978, the CPSC lowered the allowable lead levels in new paint to 0.06%. Federal and State Occupational Health and Safety Administration (Fed - OSHA 29 CFR 1920.1025 and the Division of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) under Title 8 CCR 1532.1) do not define the amount of lead in paint in a regulatory requirement; rather the activities or task define when the regulation is in effect. Both Federal and State standards use the term "trigger task" activities. In the work place, employers must make certain assumptions of the exposure levels and comply with the regulations based on the level of disturbance rather than the lead level. Title 17, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Division I, Chapter 8: Accreditation, Certification and Work Practices for Lead -Based Paint and Lead Hazards, defines lead-based paint as paint or other surfacing coating that contains an amount of lead equal to, or in excess of, one milligram per square centimeter (1.0 mg/cm2) or more than 0.5% by weight. In practice, this is interpreted to mean that any detectable amount of lead is regulated. For example, employees who perform trigger tasks (such as manual demolition) are required to receive employer provided training, air monitoring, protective clothing, respirators, and hand washing facilities. In addition, there are standard work practices required such as the use of wet methods and HEPA vacuums. PSI conducted assessments of the existing commercial office building and the church building to determine whether the buildings contain lead paints. The assessment of lead paints for the commercial office building is contained in Technical Appendix E3 and the assessment for the church/church reading room building is contained in Technical Appendix E4. Based on the analysis of the commercial office building, three of the nine samples contained detectable levels of lead (PSI, Inc., 2012c, Section 1). Based on the analysis of the church building, two of three samples contained detectable levels of lead (PSI, Inc., 2012d, Section 1). Existing School Facilities The nearest school facility to the proposed Project site is the Horace Ensign Intermediate School, which is located at 2000 Cliff Drive in the City of Newport Beach, approximately 0.5 mile northeast of the Project site (Google Earth, 201 1). Existing Airport Facilities The nearest aviation facility to the proposed Project site is the John Wayne International Airport OWA), located approximately 4.4 miles northeast of the proposed Project site. According to the Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) for the JWA, the Project site is not located within the Airport Planning Area, the Airport Impact Zones, the AELUP Notification Area for JWA, or the Airport Safety Zones (OCALUC, 2008, Figure I and Appendix D). The Project site is, however, located within the FAR Part 77 Obstruction Imaginary Surfaces and Notification Area for the JWA. The "notification surface" is defined by the AELUP by extending a slope at a gradient of 100:1 (horizontal to vertical) from the airport facility. If an application for proposed new development would protrude into the notification surface, then Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-57 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, notification to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) would be required. (OCALUC, 2008, Page 13 andAppendix D) There are no other public or private airports within the vicinity of the proposed Project site with a potential to subject the Project site to airport -related hazards. The Newport Beach General Plan Safety Element identifies the Balboa Peninsula (including the Project site) as an area vulnerable to aviation hazards. Additionally, due to the age of many of the structures on the Balboa Peninsula and the fact that these structures were built prior to adoption of current fire codes, the General Plan indicates that a fire resulting from an aviation accident could spread quickly. (Newport Beach, 2006a, p. I I-18) Emergency Management Planning The City of Newport Beach Emergency Management Plan (EMP) identifies the development and implementation of disaster training for City employees. The EMP describes the different levels of emergencies, the local emergency office, and City staff responsible for implementing the plan. The EMP does not identify the Project site as part of an evacuation route or identify any emergency planning requirements specific to the Project site or immediately surrounding areas. (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.6-9; Newport Beach, 2011c) Additionally, the EMP identifies tsunami evacuation routes, tsunami evacuation sites, and response plans, and utilizes an outdoor emergency siren system to provide residents with advance warnings of potential tsunami emergencies (the Project site is within the coverage area of the outdoor emergency siren within Veterans Memorial Park) (Newport Beach, 2011 c, pp. 94-111). Via Lido is identified as a tsunami evacuation route for residents of Lido Village and Lido Isle (Newport Beach, 2010b). Fire Hazards According to the General Plan Safety Element, the Project site and surrounding areas have a low or no susceptibility to wildfire hazards (Newport Beach, 2006a, Figure S4). However, the Safety Element also notes that many structures within the Balboa Peninsula (including the proposed Project site) are susceptible to urban fires, as these areas "...were built to older building standards and fire codes, made from non -fire -resistive construction materials, and built with no internal sprinklers and other fire safety systems are in place" (Newport Beach, 2006a, p. I 1-12). 5.4.8.2 Hazards and Hazardous Materials: Impact Analysis a) Would the Project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Would the Project Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Finding: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Based on the findings of the Phase II ESA, the Project site does not contain any environmental hazards that could pose a threat to future Project residents or the environment. In addition, the existing buildings on the site that would be demolished as part of the Project contain friable asbestos materials and materials coated with lead-based paint, both of which have the potential to expose construction workers and/or nearby sensitive receptors to health risks during demolition activities. Asbestos -containing materials and materials containing lead-based paints have the potential to create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. Implementation of Mitigation Measures MM HM -I and MM HM -2 would reduce these impacts to less -than -significant levels. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-58 No O❑ Mitigated Negative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Analysis Impacts Due to Existing Site Conditions The Phase I ESA prepared by PSI determined that the Project site has the potential to be impacted by chemicals from an off-site dry cleaning operation located northwest of and adjacent to the site (PSI, Inc., 2012b, pp. 1-2). However, based on the results of a Phase 11 Environmental Site Assessment (Phase 11 ESA) that was also conducted by PSI, the Project site does not contain any concentrations of chlorinated solvents above the laboratory reporting limit or regulatory limit (PSI, Inc., 2013, p. 3). Accordingly, there are no conditions on-site that could result in hazardous materials impacts to future Project residents or the environment. Impacts During Construction and Demolition Activities The existing commercial office building and church building were determined by PSI to contain ACMs. During demolition of the buildings, there is a potential that construction workers could be exposed to friable asbestos materials, which are known to cause human health problems, including cancer. ACMs also have the potential to become airborne during demolition activities, potentially affecting nearby sensitive receptors. The demolition of structures containing ACMs is regulated by AQMD Rule 1403, which identifies requirements that must be adhered to during demolition of buildings containing ACMs. Mandatory compliance with the provisions of Rule 1403 would ensure that Project demolition activities do not expose construction workers or nearby sensitive receptors to significant health risks associated with ACMs. Because the Project would be required to comply with AQMD Rule 1403 during demolition activities, impacts due to asbestos would be less than significant. Nonetheless, Mitigation Measure HM -I is provided below to ensure Project compliance with all applicable provisions of Rule 1403. PSI also determined that the existing commercial office building and church building contain LBPs. During the demolition of the buildings, there is a potential for exposing construction workers to health hazards associated with lead. The Project would be required to comply with Title 17, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Division I, Chapter 8, which includes requirements such as employer provided training, air monitoring, protective clothing, respirators, and hand washing facilities. In addition, there are standard work practices required such as the use of wet methods and HEPA vacuums. Mandatory compliance with Title 17, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Division I, Chapter 8 would ensure that construction workers are not exposed to significant LBP health hazards during demolition, and would reduce impacts to a level below significant. Although compliance with these provisions is mandatory, Mitigation Measure HM -2 is provided below to ensure Project compliance with the CCR requirements for LBPs. Heavy equipment would be used during construction of the proposed Project, which would be fueled and maintained by substances such as oil, diesel fuel, gasoline, hydraulic fluid, and other liquid materials that would be considered hazardous if improperly stored or handled. In addition, materials such as paints, roofing materials, solvents, and other substances typically used in building construction would be located on the Project site during construction. Improper use, storage, or transportation of hazardous materials could result in accidental releases or spills, potentially posing health risks to workers, the public, and the environment. This is a standard risk on all construction sites, and there would be no greater risk for improper handling, transportation, or spills associated with the proposed Project than would occur on any other similar construction site, and such impacts would be less than significant. There are no other components of the Project's proposed construction or demolition characteristics that have the potential to create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-59 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Impacts During Long -Term Operation Under long-term operational conditions, the Project site would be occupied by 23 townhomes. Household goods used by residential homes that contain toxic substances are usually low in concentration and small in amount; therefore, there is no significant risk to humans or the environment from the use of such household goods. Residents are required to dispose of household hazardous waste including pesticides, batteries, old paint, solvents, used oil, antifreeze, and other chemicals at a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility. Also, as of February 2006, fluorescent lamps, batteries, and mercury thermostats can no longer be disposed in the trash. The nearest collection site for household hazardous waste is the Rainbow Recycling and Disposal, located at 17121 Nichols Street in the City of Huntington Beach (approximately 9.0 roadway miles north of the Project site). Accordingly, there would be no impact during long-term operation of the proposed Project. c) Would the Project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Finding: No Impact. The Project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. The nearest school facility to the proposed Project site is the Horace Ensign Intermediate School, which is located approximately 0.5 mile northeast of the Project site. There are no existing or proposed schools within one-quarter mile of the site. Moreover, the Project proposes to develop the site with residential land uses, which are not associated with hazardous emissions or the storage or use of acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste. Therefore, the Project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school, and no impact would occur. d) Would the Project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Finding: No Impact. The Project site is not identified on a list compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5; therefore, the Project has no potential to create a significant hazard to the public or environment as the result of listed properties. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. According to the results of the Phase I ESA, the Project site was not identified during a search of regulatory databases, thereby indicating that the site is not included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 (PSI, Inc., 2012b, pp. 17-18). Therefore, the Project has no potential to create a significant hazard to the public or the environment due to presence of an existing hazardous materials site identified on a list compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, and no impact would occur. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-60 ME O❑ Mitigated Negative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Analysis e) For a project within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The proposed Project would result in a less -than -significant impact due to the exposure of people residing or working in the area to safety hazards associated with operations at John Wayne Airport. The only airport within the Project vicinity is the John Wayne Airport (JWA), which is located approximately 4.4 miles northeast of the Project site. According to the AELUP for JWA, the Project site is not located within the Airport Planning Area, the Airport Impact Zones, the AELUP Notification Area for JWA, or the Airport Safety Zones (OCALUC, 2008, Figure I and Appendix D). Accordingly, and based on the AELUP, the Project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the area. The Project site is, however, located within the FAR Part 77 Obstruction Imaginary Surfaces and Notification Area for JWA, which is defined by extending a slope at a gradient of 100:1 (horizontal to vertical) from the JWA. The nearest portion of the JWA to the Project site is located at an elevation of approximately 53 feet above mean sea level (amsl) (Google Earth, 2011). Since the Project site is located approximately 23,050 feet from the JWA, the notification surface above the Project site is approximately 283.5 feet amsl ([23,050 feet + 100] + 53 feet amsl = 283.5 feet amsl). The highest grade elevation of the Project site is approximately 11.0 feet, and the maximum height of architectural projections for the proposed Project's buildings would be 39 feet; thus, proposed buildings on-site would extend to a maximum elevation of 50 feet amsl, which is well below the FAR Part 77 notification surface of 283.5 feet. Accordingly, notification to the FAA would not be required, and no impact would occur. The General Plan Safety Element indicates that the Balboa Peninsula (including the proposed Project site) is an area of increased vulnerability to fires caused by an aviation hazard. The Safety Element indicates that this vulnerability is the result of the age of the existing structures throughout the Balboa Peninsula and their attendant lack of modern construction and fire safety considerations. As a result, the General Plan indicates that a fire caused by an aircraft accident could spread quickly throughout the Balboa Peninsula. The Project proposes the removal of two older buildings and redevelopment of the 1.2 acre property with new construction, which would adhere to current fire protection regulations and thereby improve fire safety. Accidents involving commercial aircraft are very rare events, and the proposed Project would not result in an increased safety hazard for people residing in the Project area. Impacts would be less than significant. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Finding: No Impact. No private airstrips are located in the vicinity of the Project site; therefore, the Project has no potential to result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the area caused by private airstrips. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. There are no private airstrips within the Project vicinity. Accordingly, the Project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the area caused by private airstrips, and no impact would occur. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-61 No O❑ Mitigated Negative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Analysis g) Would the Project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Finding: No Impact. The proposed Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. The City of Newport Beach EMP is the only emergency response plan applicable to the Project site. The EMP does not identify any specific requirements for the Project site, nor is the site identified by the EMP as being part of an emergency evacuation route. However, Via Lido is considered a tsunami evacuation route. Additionally, the Project would not require the complete closure of any public or private streets or roadways during construction, although the western half of Via Lido would be temporarily closed northerly of Via Malaga during installation of the Project's sewer connection for a period of up to two weeks. Traffic control measures would be required pursuant to Chapter 12.62 (Temporary Street Closure) of the City's Municipal Code. Because only a portion of the street would be closed for a period of up to two weeks, during which two-way access still would be accommodated in accordance with Chapter 12.62, temporary construction activities would not impede use of the road during emergencies (including tsunamis) or access for emergency response vehicles. Furthermore, the Project's application materials were reviewed by the City of Newport Beach Fire Department, which determined that the Project's design accommodates appropriate emergency access. The two-way drive aisle that is planned to traverse the site is appropriately designed to accommodate emergency vehicles. Accordingly, the proposed Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan, and no impact would occur. h) Would the Project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. A less -than -significant impact would occur and mitigation is not required. The General Plan Safety Element indicates that the Project site and surrounding areas are considered to have a low or no susceptibility to wildland fire hazards (Newport Beach, 2006a, Figure S4). However, and as discussed above, the Balboa Peninsula contains many older buildings that were built prior to current fire codes and do not contain fire protective measures typical of modern construction. As a result, the General Plan indicates that fires within the Balboa Peninsula (including within the Project area) could potentially spread quickly. The proposed Project would remove two existing buildings from the property and redevelop the site with new construction in accordance with modern building codes, including fire protection measures that would attenuate the risk of fire hazards. Furthermore, any fires within the Project area would not comprise wildland fires, because there are no wild lands on or near the Project site. Accordingly, the Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, and a less -than -significant impact would occur. 5.4.8.3 Hazards and Hazardous Materials: Mitigation Measures MM HM -I The City of Newport Beach shall condition all demolition permits to comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1403 with respect to asbestos Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-62 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, containing materials and the demolition contractor shall be required to comply with Rule 403. All asbestos-related work conducted during the demolition process shall be performed by a licensed Asbestos -abatement Contractor under the supervision of a certified Asbestos Consultant. Asbestos -containing construction materials (ACCMs) shall be removed and disposed of in compliance with notification and asbestos -removal procedures outlined in SCAQMD Rule 1403 to reduce asbestos-related health risks. During demolition, the demolition contractor shall maintain all records of compliance with Rule 1403, including, but not limited to, the following: evidence of notification of SCAQMD pursuant to Rule 1403; contact information for the Asbestos -abatement Contractor and Asbestos Consultant; and receipts (or other evidence) of off-site disposal of all ACCMs. These records shall be made available for City inspection upon request. Implementation of Mitigation measure MM HM -1 would reduce impacts associated with ACCMs to a level below significance. MM HM -2 The City of Newport beach shall condition all demolition permits to comply with Title 17, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Division I, Chapter 8 (LBP Regulations), which addresses requirements for the removal of components painted with lead-based paint (LBP) during demolition of existing structures. The demolition contractor shall be required to comply with these provisions. Notification to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) shall be conducted through completion of an Abatement of Lead Hazards Notification, CDPH Form 8551. The removal of all LBP materials shall be conducted: • By a Certified Lead Supervisor or Certified Lead Works, as defined by §§ 35008 and 35009 of the LBP Regulations, respectively; • In accordance with the procedures specified in Chapter 12: Abatement, "Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead -Based Paint Hazards in Housing," U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, June 1995; • Using containment and in a manner which does not result in contamination of non - work areas with lead -contaminated dust, lead -contaminated soil, or lead-based paint debris; and • In accordance with an abatement plan prepared by a certified lead supervisor, certified lead project monitor, or certified lead project designer, which includes all of the requirements as specified in § 36100(4)(A) of the LBP Regulations The Certified Lead Supervisor conducting abatement shall retain records of the notification to the CDPH, and shall retain a copy of the abatement plan on-site at all times during demolition activities. The notification and abatement plan shall be made available to the City upon request for review. All demolition activities shall be subject to inspection by the CDPH and/or City officials to ensure compliance with the requirements of the LBP Regulations and abatement plan. Following completion of all abatement activities, a clearance inspection shall be conducted by a certified lead inspector/assessor or certified lead project monitor in accordance with §§ 36000(a) and 36000(c)(3) of Title 17, CCR, Division I, Chapter 8. A copy of the results of the clearance inspection shall be provided to the City Planning Division upon completion of abatement and inspection activities. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-63 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Implementation of Mitigation measure MM HM -2 would reduce impacts associated with LBP -containing materials to a level below significance. 5.4.9 Hydrology and Water Quality Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-64 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Would the Project: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a) Violate any water quality standards or ❑ ❑ Q ❑ waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies ❑ ❑ ❑ Q or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g, the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage ❑ ❑ Q ❑ pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on - or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage ❑ ❑ Q ❑ pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of a course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which ❑ ❑ Q ❑ would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water ❑ ❑ Q ❑ quality? g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood ❑ ❑ ❑ Q hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area ❑ ❑ ❑ Q structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a ❑ ❑ ❑ Q significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? P Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or ❑ ❑ Q ❑ mudflow? Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-64 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, 5.4.9.1 Hydrology and Water Quality: Environmental Setting Regional HydroloU The Project site is located within the Newport Bay watershed, which drains approximately 152 -square mile acres of coastal and central -southern Orange County to the Pacific Ocean. Specifically, the Project site is located within the Lower Bay sub -area of the Newport Bay watershed. Primary drainage sources within the Lower Bay sub -area include stormwater drains and natural creeks (C&V Consulting, 2013b, P. 9; OCPW, 2013) Site Hydrology Under existing conditions, the Project site is covered nearly in its entirely by impervious surfaces (96%), as the subject property is occupied by a commercial office building, church building and reading room, and a surface parking lot with little landscaping (C&V Consulting, 2013b, p. 4). Stormwater flows generally drain across the Project site in a northwesterly direction, where they are discharged off-site to the adjacent streets (Via Lido and Via Oporto), with the exception of stormwater flows generated in the southwestern corner of the Project site, which flow across the site in a southeasterly direction before discharging to Via Malaga. There are no underground storm drain facilities adjacent to the Project site, as stormwater flows are carried via surface gutters within Via Lido, Via Oporto, and Via Malaga to a catch basin that empties into Newport Bay (C&V Consulting, 2013a, Seciton III). Flood Hazards The entire Project site is located within FEMA Flood Zone "X (Shaded)", indicating that the subject property is located outside of the 100 -year floodplain in an area protected by levees but is within the 500 -year floodplain (greater than 0.2% annual chance of flooding) (C&V Consulting, 2013a, Seciton III). Zone "X (Shaded)" also is used to designate base floodplains of lesser hazards, such as areas protected by levees from 100 -year flood, or shallow flooding areas with average depths of less than one foot or drainage areas less than one square mile. The City of Newport Beach General Plan Figure S3, Flood Hazards, depicts areas of the City subject to flood hazards (including the proposed Project site). General Plan Figure S3 also indicates the Project site is not subject to flood hazards associated with dam inundation (Newport Beach, 2006a, Figure S-3). Groundwater As depicted on City of Newport Beach General Plan EIR Figure 4.7-1, Water Resources, the Project site is not located within a groundwater basin (Newport Beach, 2006b, Figure 4.7-1). In addition, the Project site is completely covered by impervious surfaces. As such, the Project site does not contribute to the recharge of any regional groundwater aquifer. No potable water wells are located on or adjacent to the Project site under existing conditions. Water Ouality The California Porter -Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Section 13000 ("Water Quality") et seq., of the California Water Code), and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendment of 1972 (also referred to as the Clean Water Act (CWA)) require that comprehensive water quality control plans be developed for all waters within the State of California. In order to accomplish this, the California State Water Resources Control Board divided the state into planning regions and the present system of nine RWQCBs. The Project site and vicinity are located in the Newport Bay watershed, which is within the purview of the Santa Ana RWQCB. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-65 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Newport Bay receives stormwater drainage flows generated within the Project site and the surrounding area. Newport Bay is classified as an impaired water body, and has been placed on the CWA's Section 303(d) list of impaired waters, because of excessive concentrations of eight (8) pollutants ("pollutants of concern"), including: chlordane, copper, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), indicator bacteria, nutrients, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), pesticides, and sediment toxicity. Tsunamis Figure SI, Coastal Hazards, of the Newport Beach General Plan identifies areas within the City subject to coastal hazards, including tsunamis. As depicted on Figure Sl, the Project site is located within 100 -year tsunami inundation zone at extreme high tide (inundation elevation at 13.64 feet above sea level) (Newport Beach, 2006a, Figure SI). Furthermore, The Tsunami Inundation Map for Emergency Planning, Newport Beach Quadrangle, dated March 15, 2009, issued by the State of California -Orange County indicates that the Project site is located within a designated tsunami inundation area. As such, the potential exists for tsunami inundation to impact the site (PSI, Inc., 2012a, p. 7). Seiches A seiche is a standing wave in an enclosed or partially enclosed body of water, such as lakes, reservoirs, and bays, which can cause flooding. Causes of seiches include seismic activity and tsunamis, as well as wind and atmospheric pressure variations. The Project site is located approximately 165 feet west of Newport Bay in an area subject to tsunami hazards and regional seismic activity. As such, the potential exists for a seiche-induced flooding to impact the Project site. Applicable Policies and Regulations ♦ Federal Policies and Regulations The CWA is the principal federal statute that addresses water resources. The statute employs a variety of regulatory and non -regulatory tools to reduce direct pollutant discharges into waterways, finance municipal wastewater treatment facilities, and manage polluted runoff. The broad goal is to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation's waters so that they can support "the protection and propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife and recreation in and on the water." The CWA requires all states to conduct water quality assessments of their water resources and identify water bodies that do not meet water quality standards. In California, water quality standards are established by the nine RWQCBs. The Project site is located in the Santa Ana region, and the Santa Ana RWQCB's Santa Ana River Basin Water Quality Control Plan is applicable to the Project site and vicinity. The provisions of the CWA applicable to the proposed Project are as follows, which applies to all construction sites of over one acre in size: • CWA Section 401 requires federal agencies to obtain a Water Quality Certification from states, territories, and Indian tribes before issuing permits that would result in increased pollutant loads to a water body. A Section 401 certification can be issued only if increased pollutant loads would not cause or contribute to exceedances of water quality standards; and • CWA Section 402 authorizes the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program that covers point sources of pollution discharging to a water body. The NPDES program also requires operators of construction sites one acre or larger to prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and obtain authorization to discharge stormwater under an NPDES construction stormwater permit. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-66 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, ♦ State Policies and Regulations The California Water Code (including the Porter -Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Division 7)) is the principal state law regulating water quality in California. The Porter -Cologne Water Quality Control Act establishes a comprehensive program to protect water quality and the beneficial uses of water, and applies to both surface and groundwater. As mentioned above, the State Water Resources Control Board adopts statewide water quality control plans and its nine RWQCBs are required to develop and adopt regional water quality control plans ("basin plans") that conform to state water quality policy. As mentioned above, the Project site is located in the Santa Ana region. As such, the Santa Ana RWQCB's Santa Ana River Basin Water Quality Control Plan is applicable to the Project site; it designates beneficial uses of water bodies to be protected and establishes water quality objectives. ♦ Municipal Code Chapter 14.36 Chapter 14.36 (Water Quality) of the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code requires the City to participate as a "Co -permittee" under the NPDES permit program to accomplish the requirements of the Clean Water Act. Pursuant to this chapter, the City is required to participate in the improvement of water quality and comply with Federal requirements for the control of urban pollutants to stormwater runoff. ♦ Municipal Code Chapter 15.10 Chapter 15.10 (Excavation and Grading Code) of the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code requires that all proposed grading activities within the City obtain a grading permit from the City's Building Official. This chapter specifies grading, fill, drainage, and erosion control standards that shall be applied to the corresponding construction activity. 5.4.9.2 Hydrology and Water Quality: Impact Analysis a) Would the Project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The Project would not violate any water quality standard or waste discharge requirement. Impacts would be less than significant and mitigation is not required. Construction -Related Water Quality Impacts Construction of the proposed Project would involve the demolition of the existing structures and parking lot on-site and substantial ground disturbance, resulting in the generation of potential water quality pollutants such as silt, debris, chemicals, paints, and other solvents with the potential to adversely affect water quality. As such, short-term water quality impacts have the potential to occur during construction of the Project in the absence of any protective or avoidance measures. Pursuant to the requirements of the Santa Ana RWQCB and the City of Newport Beach, the Project would be required to obtain a NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permit for construction activities. The NPDES permit is required for all projects that include construction activities, such as clearing, grading, and/or excavation that disturb at least one acre of total land area. In addition, the Project would be required to comply with the Santa Ana RWQCB's Santa Ana River Basin Water Quality Control Program. Compliance with the NPDES permit and the Santa Ana River Basin Water Quality Control Program involves the preparation and implementation of a SWPPP for construction -related activities. The SWPPP would specify the Best Management Practices (BMPs) that the Project would be required to implement during construction activities to ensure that all potential pollutants of concern (including sediment) are Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-67 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, prevented, minimized, and/or otherwise appropriately treated prior to being discharged from the subject property. Mandatory compliance with the SWPPP would ensure that the Project does violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements during construction activities. Therefore, water quality impacts associated with construction activities would be less than significant and no mitigation measures would be required. Post Development Water Ouality Impacts The proposed Project is not anticipated to substantially alter the character of storm water runoff discharged from the subject property as compared to existing conditions. Storm water pollutants commonly associated with the land uses proposed by the Project (i.e., residential) include tire -wear residues, petroleum products such as oil and grease, metals, landscaping fertilizer and pesticides, bacteria and viruses, as well as litter and other types of wastes. These urban types of storm water pollutants are also characteristic of the land uses that occupy the Project site under existing conditions (i.e., commercial office, church, and surface parking lot). Because more landscaped area and less impervious surface area is proposed by the Project than occurs on the site under existing conditions, the Project would reduce the amount of storm water runoff discharged from the subject property as compared to existing conditions. Under existing conditions, the Project site is nearly completely covered by impervious surfaces (96% coverage); with implementation of the proposed Project, the amount of impervious surfaces on the subject property would be reduced to 89% (C&V Consulting, 2013b, pp. 4, 12-15). The additional permeable surfaces proposed by the Project would increase the amount of storm water runoff infiltration on-site as compared to existing conditions thereby reducing the volume of storm water runoff (and pollutants) discharged into downstream receiving waters. Furthermore, the Project would be required to prepare and implement a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), pursuant to the requirements of the City's NPDES permit. The WQMP is a post - construction management program that ensures the on-going protection of the watershed basin by requiring structural and programmatic controls. The Project's WQMP (Appendix D) identifies structural controls (including landscape areas and permeable pavers) and programmatic controls (including educational materials for property owners, irrigation system and landscape maintenance, and common area litter control) to minimize, prevent, and/or otherwise appropriately treat storm water runoff flows before they are discharged from the site. Mandatory compliance with the WQMP would ensure that the Project does violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements during long-term operation. Therefore, water quality impacts associated with post -development activities would be less than significant and no mitigation measures would be required. b) Would the Project substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g, the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Finding: No Impact. The Project site is not located within a groundwater recharge basin, and implementation of the Project would not result in a net deficit in aquifer volume or lowering of the local groundwater table. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. No groundwater wells are located on the Project site or proposed as part of the Project. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not deplete groundwater supplies associated with water Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-68 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, well withdraw. Additionally, as discussed under Utilities and Service Systems (refer to Section 5.4.17), the proposed Project would use less domestic water than is demanded by the existing uses on the site. For these reasons, no impact associated with groundwater supply depletion would occur. The Project site is not located within a groundwater basin and therefore cannot contribute to the recharge of any regional aquifer or local water table with beneficial potable water uses (Newport Beach, 2006b, Figure 4.7-1 and pp. 4.7-32 to 4.7-33). Regardless, implementation of the Project would decrease the amount of impervious surfaces on-site as compared to existing conditions, which in turn would increase the amount of percolation of on-site surface runoff flows into the ground (C&V Consulting, 2013a, Section III). Accordingly, implementation of the Project would not interfere with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level. No impact would occur. c) Would the Project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The proposed Project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the subject property or surrounding area in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. Impacts would be less than significant and mitigation is not required. Under existing conditions, surface storm water runoff flows from the southwestern corner of the Project site, generally traverses across site in a southeasterly direction, and is discharged off-site into surface gutters along Via Malaga. Surface stormwater flows from all other portions of the site generally traverse across site in a northwesterly direction and are discharged off-site into surface gutters along Via Lido and Via Oporto. With implementation of the Project, the site's existing hydrological characteristics would not be substantially altered; storm water runoff flows generated within the subject property would continue to be discharged into surface gutters along Via Lido, Via Oporto, and Via Malaga (C&V Consulting, 2013a, Section III). With buildout of the proposed Project, runoff from the subject property would continue to be conveyed to local surface gutters, and ultimately to Newport Bay, and the site's general drainage pattern would be maintained. Additionally, as described above under Hydrology and Water Quality Threshold a), the Project would install pervious pavement and landscape areas as BMPs, which filter sediments from surface runoff and also promote surface runoff percolation, thereby reducing the total volume and sediment load within on-site surface runoff. Therefore, with buildout of the proposed Project, there would be no significant alteration of the site's existing drainage pattern and there would not be any significant increases in the rates of erosion or siltation on- or off-site. Impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. d) Would the Project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of a course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or off-site? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The proposed Project would neither substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the subject property or surrounding area nor substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff discharged from the Project site in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off-site. Impacts would be less than significant and mitigation is not required. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-69 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, As described above under Threshold c) of this section, the proposed Project would not substantially alter the drainage pattern of the subject property or the surrounding area. Furthermore, implementation of the proposed Project would reduce the amount of impervious surfaces on-site from 96% under existing conditions to approximately 89% under proposed post -development conditions (C&V Consulting, 2013b, p. 4). By reducing the amount of impervious surfaces on the subject property, the proposed Project would increase the amount of percolation that occurs on-site, thereby reducing the amount of storm water discharged from the site as compared to existing conditions. Additionally, the peak flow rate of storm water runoff discharged from the Project site during a 100 -year storm would be reduced from 5.96 cubic feet per second (cfs) under existing conditions to 5.56 cfs under proposed post -development conditions (C&V Consulting, 2013a, Section III). Refer to Technical Appendix C, Hydrology Report, for more detailed information. Because the Project would not substantially alter the drainage patterns of the subject property or surrounding area and would not substantially increase the rate or amount of storm water runoff discharged from the site, implementation of the Project would not result in or increase flood hazard risks on- or off-site. Impacts would be less than significant. e) Would the Project create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The proposed Project would not create runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. Impacts would be less than significant and mitigation is not required. As discussed above under Thresholds c) and d) of this section, the proposed Project is designed to ensure that post -development runoff rates and volumes closely resemble those that occur under existing conditions. Under existing conditions, surface runoff flows from the Project site are conveyed via surface gutters along Via Lido, Via Oporto, and Via Malaga to a catch basin downstream of the subject property before ultimately discharging into Newport Bay. Because the surface gutters and catch basin have sufficient capacity to convey runoff from the Project site under existing conditions, and because the rate and volume of runoff would be reduced with buildout of the proposed Project, the Project would not create or contribute runoff which would exceed the capacity of any existing or planned storm water drainage system. Impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. As discussed under the analysis of Threshold a) of this section, the proposed Project would be required to comply with a future SWPPP and the Project's WQMP (Technical Appendix D), which would identify BMPs to be incorporated into the Project to ensure that near-term construction activities and long-term post -development activities of the proposed Project would not result in substantial amounts of polluted runoff. Therefore, with mandatory compliance with the Project's SWPPP and WQMP, the proposed Project would not create or contribute substantial additional sources of polluted runoff, and impacts would be less than significant. No mitigation would be required. f) Would the Project otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The proposed Project would not substantially degrade water quality. Impacts would be less than significant and mitigation is not required. As discussed above under Threshold a) of this section, mandatory compliance with the Project's SWPPP during near-term construction activities and WQMP during long-term post -development activities Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-70 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, would reduce to a level below significant the Project's potential to generate substantial amounts of polluted runoff, including runoff containing pollutants of concern for downstream impaired waters. Other than surface storm water runoff from the site, there are no other known sources of pollutants that could adversely affect or degrade water quality. Accordingly, impacts would be less than significant and mitigation is not required. g) Would the Project place housing within a I00 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? Finding: No Impact. The Project site is not located within a designated 100 -year flood hazard area and the proposed Project would not place any housing within a designated 100 - year flood hazard zone. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. The subject property is located outside of the 100 -year floodplain in an area protected by levees. No portion of the Project site is located within a designated 100 -year flood hazard area (C&V Consulting, 2013a, Section III; Newport Beach, 2006b, Figure S-3). Therefore, the Project would have no potential to place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area. No impact would occur. h) Would the Project place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? Finding: No Impact. The Project would not place any structure within a designated 100 -year flood hazard area which would impede or redirect flood flows. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. As discussed under Threshold g) of this section, above, no portion of the Project site is located within a designated 100 -year flood hazard area. Accordingly, the Project would not place any structure within a 100 -year flood hazard area that could impede or redirect flood flows. No impact would occur. i) Would the Project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Finding: No Impact. The Project site is not located within an area subject to significant flood hazard risks, and would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. As discussed under Thresholds g) and h) of this section, the proposed Project is not located within a designated 100 -year flood hazard zone; therefore, flood flows would not pose a substantial safety risk to people or structures on the Project site. The entire Project site is located within FEMA Flood Zone "X (Shaded)", indicating that the subject property is located outside of the 100 -year floodplain but is within the 500 -year floodplain (greater than 0.2% annual chance of flooding) (C&V Consulting, 2013a, Section III). This Zone designates base floodplains of lesser hazards, such as shallow flooding areas with average depths of less than one foot or drainage areas less than one square mile. The remote potential of the Project site being flooded at up to one -foot of water depth would not expose people or the proposed townhouses to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death. This flooding risk is the same risk posed to the site and surrounding land uses under existing conditions. Figure S3, Flood Hazards, in the City's General Plan does not identify the Project site as being located within a dam inundation flood hazard area (Newport Beach, 2006a, Figure S-3). In addition, the City's General Plan EIR does not identify the Project location as being within an area subject to potential flooding due to dam or levee failure Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-71 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.7-40). Hydrology and Water Quality Threshold j), below, includes a discussion of the Project's potential to expose people or structures to flood hazards associated with seiches and/or tsunamis. Accordingly, the proposed Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding including flooding from the failure of a levee or dam, and a less -than -significant impact would occur. j) Would the Project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The proposed Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. Impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. The Project site is located within a designated tsunami inundation zone (Newport Beach, 2006a, p. 7, Figure S I; PSI, Inc., 2012a); however, the likelihood of a catastrophic -level tsunami impacting the subject property (or the City) is considered remote. Over 30 tsunamis have been recorded in the southern California region since the early 1800s, with most producing small waves between 0.5-1 feet in height (Newport Beach, 2011 c, pp. 94-95). Regardless, the City has prepared an Emergency Management Plan, which identifies tsunami evacuation routes, tsunami evacuation sites, response plans, and utilizes an outdoor emergency siren system to provide residents with advance warnings of potential tsunami emergencies (the Project site is within the coverage area of the outdoor emergency siren within Veterans Memorial Park) (Newport Beach, 2011c, pp. 94-111). The City's implementation of its Emergency Management Plan would ensure that all residents on the Project site are exposed to less than significant safety hazards involving inundation by a tsunami. Implementation of the proposed project would result in a maximum of 23 additional dwellings within the identified tsunami inundation zone. This would not substantially increase exposure to existing hazards, or substantially affect evacuation of the Balboa Peninsula in the event of a tsunami; therefore, impacts would be less than significant. The probability of the subject property being exposed to significant safety hazards due to inundation by a seiche is considered low (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.7-19). Furthermore, seiche-related inundation would be restricted to the areas immediately surrounding the body of water. The Project site is located approximately 165 feet west of Newport Bay and the on-site grade is elevated above the water surface at heights ranging from approximately nine (9) to I I feet amsl. The depth of Newport Bay in the vicinity of the Project site ranges from 20-30 feet deep with shallower depths closer to shore (Newport Beach, 2012b). Due to the distance from the Project site from Newport Bay, the elevation difference between the Project site and the Bay, and the depth of the Bay, it is highly unlikely that a seiche originating from within the Bay could cause any flooding at the Project site that would result in significant risk of loss, injury or death to people or structures. Accordingly, impacts related to seiche inundation would be less than significant. Lands surrounding the Project site are generally characterized as flat and are developed with urban land uses. There are no prominent topographic landforms within the Project vicinity. Accordingly, the Project site is not subject to any mudflow hazards. 5.4.9.3 Hydrology and Water Quality: Mitigation Measures Implementation of the Project would result in less -than -significant impacts to hydrology and water quality; accordingly, mitigation measures are not required. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-72 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, 5.4.10 Land Use and Planning 5.4.10.1 Land Use and Planning: Environmental Setting Existing Surrounding Land Uses The Project site is abutted by three streets: Via Malaga, Via Lido, and Via Oporto. As shown previously on Figure 2-4, Existing and Surrounding Land Uses, adjacent to the proposed Project site on the north is an existing commercial office building. To the east of the proposed Project site, easterly of Via Lido, are several existing mixed-use and office buildings and several existing residential dwelling units with driveway and garage accesses from Via Lido. To the west of the proposed Project site, westerly of Via Oporto, is the former location of the Newport Beach City Hall, which is currently being considered for redevelopment with either an upscale hotel or a mixed-use residential/commercial project. Fire Station No. 2 will remain in service at its current location. To the north of the former City Hall site and northwest of the Project site is a mixture of commercial/retail land uses. To the south of the proposed Project site, southerly of Via Malaga, is a commercial real estate office building and church facility (St. James Church) beyond which is a 10 -story residential building at the intersection of Via Lido and La Fayette Road. The Pacific Ocean is located approximately 0.3 mile to the west of the property and Newport Bay is located approximately 165 feet to the east. Applicable Land Use Plans. Policies. and Regulations ♦ Newport Beach General Plan The City of Newport Beach approved a comprehensive update to its General Plan in November 2006. The General Plan has ten elements: Land Use Element, Harbor and Bay Element, Housing Element, Historical Resources Element, Circulation Element, Recreation Element, Arts and Cultural Element, Natural Resources Element, Safety Element, and Noise Element. The General Plan and these elements present a vision for the City's future and goals and policies to implement that vision. As shown previously on Figure 2-5, under existing conditions the southern 0.4 acre of the Project site (Parcel A) is designated by the Newport Beach General Plan (hereafter, "General Plan") for "Private Institutions (PI)" land uses, while the northern 0.8 acre (Parcel B) is designated for "Multiple Unit Residential (RM)" land uses. The RM land use designation "...is intended to provide primarily for multi- family residential development containing attached or detached dwelling units." The PI designation "is intended to provide for privately owned facilities that serve the public, including places for religious Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-73 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Would the Project: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact G) Physically divide an established ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat ❑ ❑ ❑ Lam] conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? 5.4.10.1 Land Use and Planning: Environmental Setting Existing Surrounding Land Uses The Project site is abutted by three streets: Via Malaga, Via Lido, and Via Oporto. As shown previously on Figure 2-4, Existing and Surrounding Land Uses, adjacent to the proposed Project site on the north is an existing commercial office building. To the east of the proposed Project site, easterly of Via Lido, are several existing mixed-use and office buildings and several existing residential dwelling units with driveway and garage accesses from Via Lido. To the west of the proposed Project site, westerly of Via Oporto, is the former location of the Newport Beach City Hall, which is currently being considered for redevelopment with either an upscale hotel or a mixed-use residential/commercial project. Fire Station No. 2 will remain in service at its current location. To the north of the former City Hall site and northwest of the Project site is a mixture of commercial/retail land uses. To the south of the proposed Project site, southerly of Via Malaga, is a commercial real estate office building and church facility (St. James Church) beyond which is a 10 -story residential building at the intersection of Via Lido and La Fayette Road. The Pacific Ocean is located approximately 0.3 mile to the west of the property and Newport Bay is located approximately 165 feet to the east. Applicable Land Use Plans. Policies. and Regulations ♦ Newport Beach General Plan The City of Newport Beach approved a comprehensive update to its General Plan in November 2006. The General Plan has ten elements: Land Use Element, Harbor and Bay Element, Housing Element, Historical Resources Element, Circulation Element, Recreation Element, Arts and Cultural Element, Natural Resources Element, Safety Element, and Noise Element. The General Plan and these elements present a vision for the City's future and goals and policies to implement that vision. As shown previously on Figure 2-5, under existing conditions the southern 0.4 acre of the Project site (Parcel A) is designated by the Newport Beach General Plan (hereafter, "General Plan") for "Private Institutions (PI)" land uses, while the northern 0.8 acre (Parcel B) is designated for "Multiple Unit Residential (RM)" land uses. The RM land use designation "...is intended to provide primarily for multi- family residential development containing attached or detached dwelling units." The PI designation "is intended to provide for privately owned facilities that serve the public, including places for religious Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-73 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, assembly, private schools, health care, cultural institutions, museums, yacht clubs, congregate homes, and comparable facilities." (Newport Beach, 2006a, pp. 3-12 and 3-16) As shown on Figure 2-5, General Plan designations surrounding the proposed Project site include Mixed -Use Vertical (MU -V) and Mixed -Use Water Related (MU -W2) to the north and northeast; Multiple Unit Residential (RM) and Recreational and Marine Commercial (CM) to the east; General Commercial (CG) and Private Institutions (PI) to the south; and Public Facilities (PF) and General Commercial (CG) to the west. (Newport Beach, 2006a, Figure LU6) The Project site is located within Service Area I (West Newport) for recreational facilities, as indicated by the General Plan Recreation Element (Newport Beach, 2006a, Figure 112). The proposed project site is not located within the airport zone of the John Wayne Airport as defined by the General Plan Safety Element and Noise Element (Newport Beach, 2006a, Figure S5). ♦ California Coastal Act and Coastal Land Use Plan The Coastal Zone Management Act (Title 16 U.S.C. 1451-1464) declares it a national policy to preserve, protect, develop, and where possible, to restore or enhance, the resources of the nation's coastal zone and prohibits development 1,000 feet inland from California's mean high tide without a permit from the state coastal commission. The California Coastal Act of 1976 established the California Coastal Commission and identified coastal resource planning and management policies to address public access, recreation, marine environment, land resources, and development. Implementation of California Coastal Act policies is accomplished primarily through the preparation of a Local Coastal Program (LCP) by the local government that is reviewed and certified (approved) by the Coastal Commission. The City of Newport Beach does not have a certified LCP, and therefore, does not have the jurisdiction to issue Coastal Development Permits (CDP). The City does, however, have a Coastal Land Use Plan that has been certified by the California Coastal Commission. Because the City does not have permit jurisdiction, the City reviews pending development projects for consistency with the City's General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan, and Zoning regulations before an applicant can file for a CDP with the Coastal Commission. The City is presently in the process of preparing an Implementation Plan for the City's Coastal Land Use Plan. The City relies on the California Coastal Commission to issue development permits. The Coastal Land Use Plan sets forth goals, objectives, and policies that govern the use of land and water in the coastal zone within the City of Newport Beach and its sphere of influence, with the exception of Newport Coast and Banning Ranch. As shown previously on Figure 2-6, the Newport Beach Coastal Land Use Plan designates the southern 0.4 acre of the Project site (Parcel A) for "Private Institutions (PI -B)" land uses, while the northern 0.8 acre of the Project site (Parcel B) is designated for "Multiple Unit Residential (RM -D)" land uses (Newport Beach, 2009b, Figure 2.1-5-1). As stated in the Local Coastal Program Coastal Land Use Plan, the RM -D land use designation is intended to "...provide primarily for multi -family residential development containing attached or detached dwelling units" at densities ranging from 20.0 to 29.9 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The PI -B land use designation "...is intended to provide for privately owned facilities that serve the public, including places for religious assembly, private schools, health care, cultural institutions, museums, yacht clubs, congregate homes, and comparable facilities" at a floor area ratio (FAR) ranging from 0.00 to 0.75 (Newport Beach, 2009b, pp. 2-2 and 2-5) As shown on Figure 2-6, the Coastal Land Use Plan designates the surrounding area as Mixed Use Vertical (MU -V) and Mixed -Use Water Related (MU -W) to the north and northeast; Multiple Unit Residential (RM -D) and Recreational and Marine Commercial (CM -A) to the east; General Commercial Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-74 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, (CG -B) and Private Institutions (PI -B) to the south; and Public Facilities (PF) and General Commercial (CG -B) to the west. ♦ City of Newport Beach Zoning Code The City of Newport Beach Zoning Code carries out the policies of the City of Newport Beach General Plan. It is the intent of the Zoning Code to promote the orderly development of the City; promote and protect the public health, safety, peace, comfort, and general welfare; protect the character, social and economic vitality of the neighborhoods; and to ensure the beneficial development of the City (Newport Beach, 2012a). As shown previously on Figure 2-7, under existing conditions, the southern 0.4 acre (Parcel A) of the Project site is zoned for "PI (Private Institutions) Zoning District" while the northern 0.8 acre of the Project site (Parcel B) is zoned for "RM (Multiple Residential) Zoning District" The RM zoning designation "...is intended to provide for areas appropriate for multi -unit residential developments containing attached or detached dwelling units." The PI designation "...is intended to provide for areas appropriate for privately owned facilities that serve the public, including places for assembly/meeting facilities (e.g., religious assembly), congregate care homes, cultural institutions, health care facilities, marinas, museums, private schools, yacht clubs, and comparable facilities" (Newport Beach, 2012a, §§ 20.18.0 10 and 20.26.010). ♦ Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport According to the Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) for the John Wayne Airport OWA), which is the nearest public airport to the proposed Project site, the proposed Project site is not located within the AELUP Notification Area for JWA, nor is the site subject to any impacts (safety or noise) due to airport operations. Accordingly, the proposed Project would not require review by the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for Orange County. The Project site does, however, occur within the JWA Obstruction Imaginary Surfaces zone established pursuant to Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 77, although review by the ALUC only would apply if a project is proposed that exceeds the height limits established by FAR Part 77. (OCALUC, 2008) ♦ Orange County Central and Coastal Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP) and Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) The Orange County Central and Coastal Orange County Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP) and Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) were completed in 1996, and the City of Newport Beach became a signatory agency in July of 1996. The purpose of the NCCP/HCP is to create a multi -species multi -habitat reserve system and implementation of a long-term management program that will protect primarily coastal sage scrub and the species that utilize this habitat. The NCCP/HCP focuses on multiple species and habitats and addresses the conservation of these species on a regional context. The three main target species are the coastal California gnatcatcher, cactus wren, and orange -throated whiptail, in addition to 26 other species that are also identified and afforded management protection under the NCCP/HCP. An additional ten species of plants and animals that are either federally listed or treated as if they were listed according to FESA Section 10(a) are addressed within the NCCP/HCP. According to Figure I I of the NCCP/HCP, Preliminary Reserve Concept, the Project site and surrounding areas are not targeted for conservation as part of the NCCP/HCP (Orange County, 1996, Figure 11). ♦ Lido Village Design Guidelines The City of Newport Beach adopted the Lido Village Design Guidelines in December 2011, which provide design standards for the Lido Village Sub -Area. The Lido Village Design Guidelines are intended to guide future development within the Sub -Area to foster cohesive and attractive development within Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-75 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Lido Village. The proposed Project site is located within the Lido Triangle Planning Area of the Lido Village Design Guidelines. The Design Guidelines include the following goals applicable to the Lido Triangle: • Improvements should be sensitive to the less intensive existing land uses of worship and residential sites. • Traffic calming devices should be incorporated into Via Lido to promote safe street environments for residents and patrons. • Building massing should be more horizontal in form, reinforcing the pedestrian interface. • Pursue added joint parking opportunities. The Design Guidelines also incorporate design standards for pedestrianization/edge conditions, architecture, landscaping, hardscape treatments, walls, signage, and lighting. Compliance with the Lido Village Design Guidelines would be reviewed as part of the Site Development Review Permit and would be assured through the City's future review of building permits, as required by § 20.16.020 (General Requirements for Development and New Land Uses) of the City's Zoning Code. 5.4.10.2 Land Use and Planning: Impact Analysis a) Would the Project physically divide an established community? Finding: No Impact. The proposed Project would not physically divide an established community. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. Under existing conditions, the Project site is bounded on three sides by existing roadways (Via Malaga, Via Oporto, and Via Lido) and one side by commercial/office development. Land uses within the same block consist of commercial/office land uses. The only residential uses adjacent to the site under existing conditions occur to the east, on the opposite side of Via Lido. The Project would establish a new residential community development on a site that is currently used for commercial office and church land uses. As such, the proposed Project has no potential to physically divide an established community, and no impact would occur. b) Would the Project conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Finding: Less -Than -Significant Impact. Assuming approval of the Project's proposed General Plan Amendment, Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment, and Zoning Code Amendment, the proposed Project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental impact, thereby resulting in less -than -significant impacts. The land use plans, policies, and regulations applicable to the proposed Project include the City's General Plan, the Coastal Land Use Plan, the Zoning Code/Municipal Code, the AELUP for the JWA, and the Orange County Central and Coastal Orange County NCCP/HCP. Each of these plans, policies, and regulations is discussed below. Analysis of Consistency with the City of Newport Beach General Plan The Project proposes an amendment to the City's General Plan to change the designation of Parcel A from "Private Institutions (PI)" to "Multiple Unit Residential (RM)." There would be no change to the Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-76 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, existing land use designation of Parcel B, which would remain designated "Multiple Unit Residential (RM)." Since land uses proposed for Parcel B would be consistent with the RM land use designation, no conflict with the General Plan would occur on the northern portions of the site. Although the Project proposes to change the existing land use designation for the southern portion of the site (Parcel A), there would be no conflict with the General Plan assuming approval of GP2012-005 by the City Council. During the City's review of the Project applications, the Planning Division reviewed the proposed development for consistency with all applicable policies of the General Plan, and found that there would be no conflict with any applicable General Plan policies resulting from the construction of residential uses at the site. Land Use Element policies applicable to the Project's proposed General Plan Amendment are as follows: Policy LU 3.2 Growth and Change. Enhance existing neighborhoods, districts, and corridors, allowing for re -use and infill with uses that are complementary in type, form, scale, and character. Changes in use and/or density/intensity should be considered only in those areas that are economically underperforming, are necessary to accommodate Newport Beach's share of projected regional population growth, improve the relationship and reduce commuting distance between home and jobs, or enhance the values that distinguish Newport Beach as a special place to live for its residents. The scale of growth and new development shall be coordinated with the provision of adequate infrastructure and public services, including standards for acceptable traffic level of service. Consistency Analysis. The Project would introduce residential land uses to a site that abuts residential -serving land uses to the northeast and east. All buildings proposed by the Project are complementary in type, form, scale, and character with existing and proposed surrounding land uses. The provision of 23 townhomes on the site would help the City meet its regional housing needs, as the General Plan Housing Element identifies a need for the construction of 389 homes for "Very Low" income households, 319 homes for "Low" income households, 359 homes for "Moderate" income households, and 702 homes for persons with "Above Moderate" income levels. As indicated throughout the analysis in this MND, the Project would be served by adequate infrastructure and public services, and would not result in adverse impacts to traffic level of service. Accordingly, the proposed Project would be consistent with Policy LU 3.2. Policy LU 4.2 Prohibition of New Residential Subdivisions: Prohibit new residential subdivisions that would result in additional dwelling units unless authorized by an amendment of the General Plan (GPA). Lots that have been legally merged through the Subdivision Map Act and City Subdivision Code approvals are exempt from the GPA requirements and may be re - subdivided to the original underlying legal lots. This policy is applicable to all Single Unit, Two Unit and Multiple Unit Residential land use categories. Consistency Analysis. The proposed Project would be consistent with Policy LU 4.2 because the Project's applications include a General Plan Amendment (GP2012-005) to change a portion of the site's existing land use designation to allow for subdivision of the site with multi -family residential land uses. Accordingly, the proposed Project would be consistent with or otherwise would not conflict with any policy of the General Plan Land Use Element. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-77 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Policy LU 5.1.2 Compatible Interfaces: Require that the height of development in nonresidential and higher - density residential areas transition as it nears lower -density residential areas to minimize conflicts at the interface between the different types of development. Consistency Analysis. The proposed Project site is surrounded by a mixture of high density residential, commercial, public facility, private institution, and recreational/marine commercial land uses. Although the Project consists of a proposal to re -designate the site to all for multiple unit residential land uses, the site does not abut lower -density residential areas. The buildings proposed as part of the Project would be similar in height to the existing office building located in the northern portion of the site. Specifically, the existing office building measures 35 feet in height, while the proposed buildings would measure up to 35 feet 4 inches in height, with architectural projections up to 39 feet. Unlike the existing building, the proposed buildings would include architectural projections for roof deck access that exceed the current height of the office building; however, the proposed buildings also would provide architectural variation that is compatible as it transitions between adjacent, slightly lower structures. In addition, the heights of the proposed buildings are consistent with existing building heights in the surrounding area, including existing office buildings and mixed-use (office and residential) buildings located north and east of the Project site, and an existing two- to three-story church building located south of the site. Based on this analysis, the Project has incorporated appropriate height transitions to minimize conflicts at the interface between different types of development and would not result in a substantial change in building heights as compared to the existing office use on-site; accordingly, the Project would not conflict with Land Use Element Policy LU 5.1.2. Policy LU S. 1.2 Neighborhood Identification: Encourage and support the identification of distinct residential neighborhoods. Consistency Analysis. The area surrounding the proposed Project contains high- density residential uses. The Project has been designed as a separate Planned Community. Implementation of the PC Text as part of the Project would help to create a separate and distinct identity for this Project as a multi -unit residential land use that would help support and provide a retail base for the mixed-use neighborhood of Lido Village in which the Project is located. Accordingly, development of the site with residential uses as proposed by the Project would not result in a conflict with Policy LU 5.1.2. Policy LU S. 1.6 Character and Quality of Residential Properties: Require that residential front setbacks and other areas visible from the public street be attractively landscaped, trash containers enclosed, and driveway and parking paving minimized. Consistency Analysis. The Project incorporates a variety of landscaped treatments for areas visible from the public street, as depicted on Figure 3-7 and Figure 3-8. All solid waste storage areas would be screened as required by Municipal Code § 20.030.020.0 (Buffering and Screening) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Areas devoted to parking and driveways are proposed to include enhanced paving materials, with landscaped areas provided where possible to minimize the amount of paving on-site. Accordingly, the Project would be consistent with Land Use Element Policy LU 5.1.6. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-78 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Policy LU 5.1.9 Character and Quality of Multi -Family Residential. Require that multi -family dwellings be designed to convey a high quality architectural character in accordance with the following principles (other than the Newport Center and Airport Area, which are guided by Goals 6.14 and 6.15, respectively, specific to those areas): Building Elevations Treatment of the elevations of buildings facing public streets and pedestrian ways as the principal fagades with respect to architectural treatment to achieve the highest level of urban design and neighborhood quality Architectural treatment of building elevations and modulation of mass to convey the character of separate living units or clusters of living units, avoiding the appearance of a singular building volume Provide street- and path -facing elevations with high-quality doors, windows, moldings, metalwork, and finishes Ground Floor Treatment Where multi -family residential is developed on large parcels such as the Airport Area and West Newport Mesa: Set ground -floor residential uses back from the sidewalk or from the right-of-way, whichever yields the greater setback to provide privacy and a sense of security and to leave room for stoops, porches and landscaping. Raise ground -floor residential uses above the sidewalk for privacy and security but not so much that pedestrians face blank walls or look into utility or parking spaces. Encourage stoops and porches for ground -floor residential units facing public streets and pedestrian ways. Where multi -family residential is developed on small parcels, such as the Balboa Peninsula, the unit may be located directly along the sidewalk frontage and entries should be setback or elevated to ensure adequate security (as shown below). Roof Design Modulate roof profiles to reduce the apparent scale of large structures and to provide visual interest and variety. Parking Design covered and enclosed parking areas to be integral with the architecture of the residential units' architecture. Open Space and Amenity Incorporate usable and functional private open space for each unit Incorporate common open space that creates a pleasant living environment with opportunities for recreation. Consistency Analysis. All buildings proposed as part of the Project are oriented towards the streets and incorporate architectural treatments to achieve quality urban design and neighborhood quality. Architectural treatments features off- setting planes and enhanced architectural elements to convey the character of separate living units and would not appear as a singular building volume. Building elevations included as part of the Project's plans identify high-quality architectural treatments fronting abutting streets. All units would be located directly along the sidewalk frontage and would be setback from the street and slightly elevated to Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-79 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, provide for security. Roof elements have been designed to provide for setbacks so as to reduce the apparent scale of the proposed buildings and to provide interest and variety. There are no covered or enclosed parking areas proposed as part of the Project. As indicated on Figure 3-9, the Project incorporates usable and functional private open space for each unit, and incorporates common open space areas to help promote a pleasant living environment with opportunities for passive recreational use by future Project residents. Therefore, the Project would be fully consistent with Land Use Element Policy LU 5.1.9. Policy LU 6.2.1 Residential Supply. Accommodate a diversity of residential units that meets the needs of Newport Beach's population of fair share of regional needs in accordance with the Land Use Plan's designations, applicable density standards, design, and development policies, and the adopted Housing Element. Consistency Analysis. As indicated below in the analysis of Project consistency with the General Plan Housing Element, the Project would be fully consistent with the Housing Element. The General Plan Housing Element identifies a need for the construction of 389 homes for "Very Low" income households, 319 homes for "Low" income households, 359 homes for "Moderate" income households, and 702 homes for persons with "Above Moderate" income levels. The Project would provide for 23 dwelling units, which would assist the City in meeting its housing needs. Housing in -lieu fees would be collected as part of the project to help the City meet its affordable housing needs. Policy LU 6.9.1 Encourage uses that take advantage of Lido Village's location at the Harbor's turning basin and its vitality and pedestrian character, including visitor -serving and retail commercial, small lodging facilities (bed and breakfasts, inns), and mixed-use buildings that integrate residential with retail uses [areas designated as "MU -W2'; Subarea "A'7. A portion of the Harbor frontage and interior parcels (Subarea `B') may also contain multi -family residential [designated as "RM(20/ac)'], and the parcel adjoining the Lido Isle Bridge, a recreational and marine commercial use [designated as "CM(0.3)']. Consistency Analysis. The Project proposes to change a portion of the site's existing General Plan land use designation from "Private Institutions (PI)" to "Multiple Unit Residential (RM)," while the existing "Multiple Unit Residential (RM)" designation applied to the Project site would not be changed as part of the Project. The Project proposes to develop the site with 23 townhome units. The Project site is located within Subarea "B," of the Balboa Peninsual/Lido Village/Cannery Village/Mc Fadden Square, as identified on General Plan Figure LU19, where multifamily uses are encouraged. Accordingly, the proposed Project would be consistent with Policy LU 6.9.1. The only goals/policies of the General Plan Harbor and Bay Element that are applicable to the Project are Policy HB 2.2 and Goal HB 8: Policy HB 2.2 Land Use Changes. Consider the impact on water -dependent and water -related land uses when reviewing proposals for land use changes, considering both the subject property and adjacent properties. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-80 Goal HB B. ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Consistency Analysis. The proposed Project would have no impact on water - dependent or water -related land uses, when considered in the context of the Project surrounding land uses. The Pacific Ocean is located approximately 0.3 mile to the west of the property and Newport Bay is located approximately 165 feet to the east. The Project site does not front these water bodies and there is intervening development located between the Project site and these water bodies. Existing uses on-site are not water dependant or water related and the residential use of 23 townhomes proposed by the Project would not be water -dependent or water -related. Enhancement and protection of water quality of all natural water bodies, including coastal waters, creeks, bays, harbors and wetlands. Consistency Analysis. The proposed Project would be required to comply with the Project's Preliminary WQMP, and also would be required to implement a SWPPP and Final WQMP to preclude water quality impacts during both construction and long-term operation. As such, the Project would not diminish the enhancement or protection of water quality in natural water bodies. Accordingly, the proposed Project would be consistent with or otherwise would not conflict with any policy of the General Plan Harbor and Bay Element. The General Plan Housing Element identifies a need for the construction of 389 homes for "Very Low" income households, 319 homes for "Low" income households, 359 homes for "Moderate" income households, and 702 homes for persons with "Above Moderate" income levels. The Project would provide for 23 dwelling units; accordingly, the Project would be consistent with the General Plan Housing Element by assisting the City in meeting its housing needs, as encouraged by Housing Element Goal H3. The proposed Project would be consistent with, or otherwise would not conflict with, all other goals and policies of the General Plan Housing Element. The goals and policies of the General Plan Historical Resources Element are not applicable to the Project since the Project site does not contain any historical resources (as indicated under the analysis of Cultural Resources in Section 5.4.5). Accordingly, the Project would not conflict with any goals or policies of the Historical Resources Element. As indicated in more detail in Section 5.4.16, Transportation/Trak, the proposed Project would result in a net reduction in the amount of traffic generated from the site as compared to existing conditions, and therefore would have no adverse impact on the existing level of service (LOS) for City roadways or intersections. The Project also does not involve any improvements to any public roads. The proposed Project would be consistent with, or otherwise would not conflict with, all policies of the General Plan Circulation Element. The General Plan Recreation Element and Figure R3 indicate the following for Service Area I (which includes the proposed Project site): Service Area I—West Newport. Most of West Newport's recreation land is in beaches. There is a deficit of 21.6 acres, and a need for sports fields within a new community or neighborhood -level park. There is a future park site identified in this service area, Sunset Ridge Park which is designated as an active park to include ball fields, picnic areas, a playground, parking, and restrooms. Additionally, an active community park (possibly lighted) should be developed in Banning Ranch, regardless of the Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-81 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, ultimate development of the site, to accommodate the Service Area and Citywide needs for active sports fields. As indicated, the Project site is not identified by the General Plan for improvement with any recreational resources, as recreational needs within Service Area I are planned to occur in other off-site locations. Moreover, the Project site is not of sufficient size to accommodate "sports fields within a new community or neighborhood -level park." Additionally, and in accordance with the Recreation Element Policy R 1.1, the Project developer would be required to contribute in -lieu fees pursuant to the City's Park Dedication Fee Ordinance. There are no other goals or policies of the General Plan Recreation Element (e.g., the site and surroundings) that are applicable to the proposed Project; accordingly, the proposed Project would be consistent with, or otherwise would not conflict with, all policies of the General Plan Recreation Element. There are no policies within the General Plan Arts and Cultural Element that are applicable to the proposed Project; accordingly, the proposed Project would be consistent with, or otherwise would not conflict with, any policies of the General Plan Arts and Cultural Element. The proposed Project would be required to comply with Chapter 14.16 (Water Conservation and Supply Level Regulations) of the City's Municipal Code, which outlines water conservation requirements applicable to all developments. Compliance with Chapter 14.16 would ensure that the Project meets the General Plan Natural Resources Element's Water Supply goals (Goal NR 1). The Project also would be required to comply with the Project's Preliminary WQMP, and also would be required to implement a SWPPP and Final WQMP to preclude water quality impacts during both construction and long-term operation, thereby ensuring compliance with Natural Resources Element Goals NR 3 and NR 4. The Project would result in an overall reduction in air quality emissions from the site and would incorporate measures to reduce construction -related emissions (as indicated under the discussion and analysis of Air Quality in Section 5.4.3), and would therefore comply with Natural Resources Element Goals NR 6 through NR 8. Mitigation also has been incorporated to ensure that the Project would not result in impacts to archaeological or paleontological resources (refer to Section 5.4.5, Cultural Resources), and the Project would therefore comply with Natural Resources Element Goal NR 18. The Project would not have an adverse impact on the City's visual resources (as indicated under Section 5.4.1, Aesthetics), and would comply with Natural Resources Element Goals NR 20 and NR 21. Furthermore, the Project would be required to comply with the state's Title 24 standards, which incorporate measures that ensure the incorporation of energy conservation measures in new developments; accordingly, the Project would be consistent with the Natural Resources Element Goal NR 24. The remaining goals and policies of the Natural Resources Element are not applicable to the proposed Project. Accordingly, the proposed Project would be consistent with, or otherwise would not conflict with, all policies of the General Plan Natural Resources Element. As indicated under Section 5.4.9, Hydrology and Water Quality, the impacts associated with tsunami hazards and seiches would be less than significant; thus, the Project would be consistent with General Plan Safety Element Goals S I and S 2. As indicated under Section 5.4.6, Geology and Soils, the Project would result in less -than -significant impacts associated with geologic hazards; as such, the Project would be consistent with General Plan Safety Element Goal S 4. The Project site is not subject to substantial flood or fire hazards, and the Project would be consistent with General Plan Safety Element Goals S 5 and S 6. As indicated under the discussion and analysis in Section 5.4.8, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, with the incorporation of mitigation measures to address asbestos containing materials and lead based paints during demolition of the existing structures on-site, the Project would fully comply with General Plan Safety Element Goal S 7. The Project site also is not subject to substantial risks from aviation hazards, and would therefore comply with General Plan Safety Element Goal S 8. The remaining Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-82 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, policies of the General Plan Safety Element are not applicable to the proposed Project. Accordingly, the proposed Project would be consistent with, or otherwise would not conflict with, all policies of the General Plan Safety Element. As indicated under the discussion and analysis in Section 5.4.12, Noise, the proposed Project would not be subject to noise levels that exceed the City's noise standards, nor would the uses proposed by the Project expose any sensitive receptors to substantial noise increases. The Project also would be required to comply with the Municipal Code restrictions on construction -related noise. Accordingly, the proposed Project would be consistent with, or otherwise would not conflict with, all policies of the General Plan Noise Element. Based on the foregoing analysis, and assuming approval of the Project's General Plan Amendment to change the site's existing land use designation, the proposed Project would not conflict with the City of Newport Beach General Plan goals and policies, and impacts would be less than significant. Analysis of Consistency with the City of Newport Beach Coastal Land Use Plan Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment No. LC2013-001 proposes to change the existing Coastal Land Use Plan designation for Parcel A of the Project site from "Private Institutions (PI -B)" to "Multiple Unit Residential (RM -D)" to match the land use designation of Parcel B, which would remain designated "Multiple Unit Residential (RM -D)." With approval of Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment No. LC2013- 001, uses permitted within the "Private Institutions (PI -B)" land use designation would no longer be allowed on the southern portions of the site. These uses include privately owned facilities that serve the public, including places for religious assembly, private schools, health care, cultural institutions, museums, yacht clubs, congregate homes, and comparable facilities (Newport Beach, 2009, p. 2-5). There are no policies within the Coastal Land Use Plan that prohibit or discourage the proposed change of land use to residential. The Coastal Land Use Plan encourages retail and commercial uses that will enhance the vitality and pedestrian character of Lido Village. The Project would provide residential units that would support retail uses within Lido Village in a way that the existing church does not. Furthermore, the proposed land use change would not conflict with the Coastal Act Goals for the Coastal Zone, as the Project would not adversely affect the quality of the coastal zone environment or its natural and artificial resources, nor would the Project obstruct public access to or along the coast or affect any recreational activities in the coastal zone. Thus, the proposed Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment would not conflict with the City of Newport Beach Coastal Land Use Plan. Assuming approval of Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment No. LC2013-001 by the Newport Beach City Council and the California Coastal Commission, the Project would be consistent with the land use designations applied to the site by the Coastal Land Use Plan, and no impact would occur. The 23 townhomes proposed for the site would be fully consistent with the site's existing and proposed designation of RM -D. The Project also would not conflict with any of the policies identified in the Coastal Land Use Plan for Land Use and Development within the Balboa Peninsula. Policy 2.7-1 requires the City to "Continue to maintain appropriate setbacks and density, floor area, and height limits for residential development to protect the character of established neighborhoods and to protect coastal access and coastal resources" Although the Project would allow for an increase in height (from a maximum height of 28 feet to a maximum height of 35 feet 4 inches, with architectural projections allowed up to a height of 39 feet) as part of the site's proposed Planned Community (PC) zoning designation, the proposed height increase would not degrade the existing character of the site or its surroundings as more fully discussed in Section 5.4.1, Aesthetics, nor would the proposed height increase affect coastal access or coastal resources. Accordingly, the Project would not conflict with Policy 2.7-1 of the Coastal Land Use Plan. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-83 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, The proposed Project would be consistent with, or otherwise would not conflict with, all of the policies of the Land Use and Development section of the Coastal Land Use Plan. The proposed Project would have no impact on public access to coastal areas or coastal recreational resources. The Pacific Ocean is located approximately 0.3 mile to the west of the property and Newport Bay is located approximately 165 feet to the east. The Project site does not front these water bodies and there is intervening development located between the Project site and these water bodies. The project site is not identified for lateral or coastal access per the Coastal Access and Recreation Map (I of 3) of the Coastal Land Use Plan. As such, the proposed Project would be consistent with, or otherwise would not conflict with, all of the policies of the Public Access and Recreation section of the Coastal Land Use Plan. The proposed Project site is developed with urban uses under existing conditions and does not contain any sensitive biological, marine, or coastal resources. Accordingly, implementation of the proposed Project would not conflict with any of the policies of the Coastal Resources Protection section of the Coastal Land Use Plan. Based on the foregoing analysis, and assuming approval of the Project's Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment to change the site's existing land use designation, the proposed Project would not conflict with the City of Newport Beach Coastal Land Use policies, and less -than -significant impacts would occur. Analysis of Consistency with the City of Newport Beach Zoning Code/Municipal Code Under existing conditions, the southern 0.4 acre (Parcel A) of the proposed Project site is zoned "PI (Private Institutions) Zoning District" while the northern 0.8 acre (Parcel B) is zoned "RM (Multiple Residential) Zoning District." Proposed Zoning Code Amendment No. CA2012-008 seeks to apply the "Planned Community District (PC)" zoning district to the entire 1.2 -acre site and establish development standards for heights and setbacks that vary from the height and setback standards of the City's Zoning Code. Assuming approval of the Zoning Code Amendment, Site Development Review No. SR2013-001 would ensure that the project is fully compatible with the site's zoning designations and requirements. In addition, the proposed Project would be required to comply with a variety of other provisions of the City's Municipal Code, all of which would be enforced either as a condition of Project approval or through future City review of implementing development applications (grading permits, building permits, etc.). Based on the foregoing analysis, the proposed Project would be consistent with or otherwise would not conflict with all applicable provisions of the City's Zoning Code and Municipal Code. Analysis of Consistency with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan for the John Wayne Airport As indicated under the discussion and analysis provided in Section 5.4.8, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, the Project site is not located within the Airport Planning Area, the Airport Impact Zones, the AELUP Notification Area for JWA, or the Airport Safety Zones (OCALUC, 2008, Figure I and Appendix D). Additionally, although the Project site is located within the FAR Part 77 Obstruction Imaginary Surfaces and Notification Area for the JWA, buildings proposed by the Project are not of a height that would penetrate the imaginary surface, and the Part 77 notification provisions would therefore not apply to the proposed Project. Accordingly, the proposed Project would not conflict with the AELUP for the JWA. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-84 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Analysis of Consistency with the Lido Village Design Guidelines The following elements of the Lido Village Design Guidelines are applicable to the proposed Project. An analysis of the Project's consistency with applicable sections of the Lido Village Design Guidelines is provided below. Lido Triangle Goals: Goal. Improvements should be sensitive to the less -intensive existing land uses of worship and residential sites. Consistency Analysis: The proposed Project would involve the construction of 23 townhomes and other site improvements. The development of 23 townhomes on the site would be fully compatible with the less -intensive existing land uses of worship and residential sites existing within the Lido Triangle. Goal. Traffic calming devices should be incorporated into Via Lido to promote safe street environments for residents and patrons. Consistency Analysis: The Project does not involve any improvements within the Via Lido right-of-way, with exception of the construction of the underground sewer connection. As such, the Project would have no impact on existing traffic calming devices along Via Lido, nor would the Project interfere with the installation of any future traffic calming devices along this roadway. Additionally, the Project has been designed to accommodate the potential future pedestrianization of Via Oporto and portions of Via Malaga, although such improvements are not proposed as part of the Project and no plans for such improvements have been approved by the City Goal: Building massing should be more horizontal in form, reinforcing the pedestrian interface. Consistency Analysis: Buildings proposed as part of the Project consist of three-story buildings designed in a total of five (5) clusters. Most buildings proposed on-site are designed to be wider than they are tall, with gaps provided between individual building clusters. Roof and building facade elements have been designed with off -setting planes that reduce the building's perceived mass and scale, particularly in comparison to the existing office building located in the northern portion of the site that does not include such elements. The Project also incorporates landscaped open space areas and a water feature, which further serve to promote pedestrian interface with the surrounding area. Goal. Pursue added joint parking opportunities. Consistency Analysis: The Project consists of a proposed residential development that does not afford joint parking opportunities. However, the Project has been designed to accommodate all required parking on-site, thereby reducing the need for additional off-site parking agreements within the Lido Triangle area. Lido Triangle Conditions: The Lido Village Design Guidelines includes criteria for Village Edges and Boundaries. Criteria that are applicable to the proposed Project are provided under the "Lido Triangle Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-85 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Conditions" subsection. Key improvement points identified for the Lido Triangle include the following: • Improving the pedestrian experience along Via Lido, Via Oporto, Via Malaga, and 32nd Street. • Including internal pedestrian connectivity from Via Oporto to the Bay. • Providing creative node or outdoor living room conditions within the Design Area. • Addressing service needs within Via Lido Plaza without sacrificing improvement opportunities. The Project has been designed to meet the requirements specified for the Lido Triangle. As previously depicted on Figure 3-7, the Project incorporates several common open space areas. The corner of Via Lido and Via Malaga would feature a common open space area with low seatwall/planter, accent palm, and water feature with spillway. Other common open space areas (located at the north end of the site along Via Lido and the southwest corner of the site at the corner of Via Malaga and Via Oporto) would be improved with enhanced paving, seating, and landscaping (including accent palms). In front of each townhouse unit (and along the street frontage), a low stone planter wall would be provided. Additionally, each of the proposed dwelling units is designed to face the street frontages. These features would serve to improve the pedestrian experience along Via Lido, Via Oporto, and Via Malaga, particularly in comparison to existing conditions wherein the street frontage with Via Lido and a portion of Via Malaga is dominated by a parking lot and the remainder of the site's frontage exhibits an overall lack of pedestrian -scale amenities. The provision of the common open space areas at the intersections of Via Lido/Via Malaga and Via Malaga/Via Oporto also would provide for node opportunities to area residents. The Project also has been designed to accommodate internal pedestrian connectivity, which would allow pedestrian access between the on-site buildings and the Bay. The Project site is not located within the Via Lido Plaza. Additionally, the Village Edges and Boundaries section of the Lido Village Design Guidelines identifies the Project site's frontage with Via Lido, Via Malaga as a "Street Focused Edge," where "image -defining facades with street orientation," "strong building/pedestrian interface," and "unifying theme and character along [the] street segment" are encouraged. In addition, the corners of Via Lido/Via Malaga and Via Malaga/Via Oporto are identified as "Node Opportunities," which are defined as "formal and informal people places, outdoor living room, plazas, or building relief." Via Lido also is identified as a "Primary Pedestrian Corridor" where enhanced landscape elements and pedestrian -friendly safety measures are encouraged. Via Malaga and Via Oporto are identified as "Secondary Pedestrian Corridors" where the following elements are encouraged: limited vehicle access; private and public conditions that encourage multi -modal use; and taxi and bus drop zones, charter boat transfers, bicycle racks, etc. Finally, the site's western frontage along Via Oporto is identified as a "Service Edge" where special screening and limited pedestrian access are encouraged. The Project has been designed to orient all buildings towards the street frontages, thereby providing for a "Street Focused Edge." Landscaping and hardscaping amenities would further serve to promote the Projects frontage as a pedestrian -friendly environment. All buildings also are designed with a consistent theme, which would not conflict with the architectural character of the surrounding neighborhood. The Project's frontages with Via Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-86 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Malaga and Via Oporto have been designed to accommodate future additional pedestrian amenities, although such amenities are not proposed as part of the Project and no plans for such improvements have been approved by the City. Current plans for the adjacent commercial center and City Hall site west of Via Oporto renders the site's western frontage as less of a "Service Edge" and more as an area where Street Focused Edges are encouraged by the Lido Village Design Guidelines. As indicated above, the site's western frontage incorporates a number of elements that are focused towards the street. Based on the foregoing analysis, the proposed Project would be consistent with the Lido Triangle Conditions section of the Lido Village Design Guidelines. Incentive Considerations: The Lido Village Design Guidelines also incorporates a section on Incentive Consideration, which provides for incentives to owners/tenants for physical improvements that provide enhanced amenities (e.g., pedestrian connections, enhanced architectural detail, enhanced landscaping, open space, plazas, and courtyards) and/or incorporate additional elements of public benefit (e.g., view sheds, enhanced coastal access, and enhanced landscaping and paving improvements within the public right-of-way). One of the incentives identified in this section allows for "increases in building height from the base height limit of 26 feet for flat roofs and 31 feet from sloped roofs to the maximum height limit of 35 feet for flat roofs and 40 feet for sloped roofs..." The Project proposes to allow for an increase in building heights of 35 feet 4 inches and 39 feet for architectural projections, as allowed by the Incentive Considerations. In exchange for the relief from the typical height requirements, the Project proposes to improve the visual aesthetic of the site within the Lido Triangle, provide for enhanced opportunities for pedestrian connections, and provide additional amenities such as the open space node features at the intersections of Via Lido/Via Malaga and Via Malaga/Via Oporto. As such, the Project complies with the Incentive Considerations section of the Lido Village Design Guidelines. Accordingly, implementation of the proposed Project would not result conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect and impacts would be less than significant. c) Would the Project conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Finding: No Impact. There are no policies of the Orange County Central and Coastal Orange County NCCP/HCP that are applicable to the proposed Project. Accordingly, no impact would occur. As indicated under the discussion of Threshold 6 in Section 5.4.4, Biological Resources, although the Project site is located within the Orange County Central and Coastal Orange County NCCP/HCP areas, the Project site and surrounding areas are not targeted for conservation (Orange County, 1996, Figure 11). There are no policies of the NCCP/HCP that are applicable to the proposed Project. Accordingly, no impact would occur. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-87 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, 5.4.10.3 Land Use and Planning: Mitigation Measures Implementation of the proposed Project would result in no impacts due to land use and planning considerations; accordingly, mitigation measures are not required. 5.4.11 Mineral Resources Would the Project: Potentially Significant impact Less Than significant with Mitigation incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact CO Result in the loss of availability of a known ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? 5.4.11.1 Mineral Resources: Environmental Setting According to the City's General Plan EIR, which uses mapping conducted by the California Geological Survey (CGS) that maps areas known as Mineral Resources Zones (MRZs), the proposed Project site is mapped within MRZ-3, which is defined as "areas containing mineral deposits of undetermined significance" (Newport Beach, 2006b, Figure 4.5-4). The City's General Plan does not identify the Project site as containing a locally important mineral resource recovery site (Newport Beach, 2006a, Figure 1-1-16). There are no specific mineral resource plans applicable to the proposed Project site, and no other plans that identify any locally important mineral resource recovery sites on the Project site or immediate vicinity. 5.4.11.2 Mineral Resources: Impact Analysis a) Would the Project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Finding: No Impact. The proposed Project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. The Project site is developed with urban uses. No mines, wells, or other resource extraction activity occurs on the property or is known to have ever occurred on the property. The proposed Project site is identified by the CGS as being located within MRZ-3, which is an area where the significance of mineral deposits have not been determined by the CGS. Accordingly, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state, and no impact would occur. b) Would the Project result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? Finding: No Impact. The proposed Project would not result in the loss of availability of a locally - important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan, and no impact would occur. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-88 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, The proposed Project site is not identified as a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general, specific plan, or other land use plan. Accordingly, no impact would occur. 5.4.11.3 Mitigation Measures Implementation of the proposed Project would result in no impacts to mineral resources; accordingly, mitigation measures are not required. 5.4.12 Noise 5.4.12.1 Noise: Environmental Setting According to the General Plan Noise Element, land uses abutting Via Lido, including the Project site, are subject to traffic -related noise levels of approximately 60 A -weighted decibels (d BA) CNEL (Newport Beach, 2006a, Figures NI and N4). Noise at the Project site under existing conditions is limited to operational activities associated with the on-site church, church reading room, and commercial office building. There are no known unusual or loud noises that occur on the property on a regular basis. Newport Beach Municipal Code Chapter 10.26, Community Noise Control Newport Beach Municipal Code Chapter 10.26 establishes provisions for the control of noise sources within the City. Section 10.26.025 (Exterior Noise Standards) establishes exterior noise standards and specifies that multiple -family residential land uses should not be exposed to noise levels exceeding 55 A - Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-89 Less Than Potentially significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Would the Project result in: impact Incorporated Impact Impact a) Fxposure of persons to or generation of ❑ ❑ Q ❑ noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of ❑ ❑ Q ❑ excessive groundbome vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic ❑ ❑ Q ❑ increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land ❑ ❑ Q ❑ use land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 0 For a project within the vicinity of a private ❑ ❑ ❑ Q airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 5.4.12.1 Noise: Environmental Setting According to the General Plan Noise Element, land uses abutting Via Lido, including the Project site, are subject to traffic -related noise levels of approximately 60 A -weighted decibels (d BA) CNEL (Newport Beach, 2006a, Figures NI and N4). Noise at the Project site under existing conditions is limited to operational activities associated with the on-site church, church reading room, and commercial office building. There are no known unusual or loud noises that occur on the property on a regular basis. Newport Beach Municipal Code Chapter 10.26, Community Noise Control Newport Beach Municipal Code Chapter 10.26 establishes provisions for the control of noise sources within the City. Section 10.26.025 (Exterior Noise Standards) establishes exterior noise standards and specifies that multiple -family residential land uses should not be exposed to noise levels exceeding 55 A - Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-89 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, weighted decibels (dBA) between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m., and 50 dBA from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. In areas where the ambient (background) noise levels exceed these thresholds, the ambient standard is considered to be the noise standard pursuant to Section 10.26.025 (Exterior Noise Standards). Section 10.26.025 establishes interior noise standards for residential land uses of 45 dBA for the hours between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m., and 40 dBA between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. Section 10.26.035 identifies exemptions to the noise standards outlined in Chapter 10.26 (Community Noise Control), and specifically excludes "noise sources associated with construction, repair, remodeling, demolition or grading of any real property." Noise standards for such construction activities are instead established by Municipal Code Chapter 10.28 (discussed below). Newport Beach Municipal Code Chapter 10.26. Loud and Unreasonable Noise Municipal Code Chapter 10.26 (Community Noise Control) regulates the "...making, allowing, creation, or maintenance of loud and unreasonable, unnecessary, or unusual noises which are prolonged, unusual, annoying, disturbing and/or unreasonable in their time, lace and use are a detriment to public health, comfort, convenience, safety, general welfare and the peace and quiet of the City and its inhabitants" (Newport Beach, 2012a, § 10.28.007). Section 10.28.040 (Construction Activity — Noise Regulations) provides noise regulations for construction activity, and prohibits noise being produced during specific hours of the day and days of the week or year. Specifically, construction activities are limited by Section 10.28.040 to between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Mondays through Saturdays (except holidays), and prohibits construction activities on Sundays and federal holidays. Airport Noise According to the AELUP for the fWA, the proposed Project site is not subject to substantial airport - related noises, as the Project site is located well outside of the identified 60 decibel contour (OCALUC, 2008, Appendix D). There are no other public or private airports within the Project vicinity that have the potential to subject the Project site to substantial noise associated with airport operations. 5.4.12.2 Noise: Impact Analysis a) Would the Project result in the exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Finding: Less than Significant Impact. With mandatory adherence to the timing provisions of Municipal Code § 10.28 (Loud and Unreasonable Noise) during construction activities, impacts associated with the exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of the City's Municipal Code standards would be less than significant. Construction Noise During demolition of the existing buildings on the site and construction of the proposed 23 townhomes and other site improvements, construction equipment would generate substantial amounts of noise. However, construction noise is explicitly exempted from the noise standards specified in Municipal Code Section 10.26 (Community Noise Control), provided such activities adhere to the timing restrictions specified in Section 10.28. Section 10.28 limits construction activities to between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Mondays through Saturdays (except holidays), and prohibits construction activities on Sundays and federal holidays. The Project would be required to adhere to the timing restrictions established by Section 10.28 of the City's Municipal Code; as such, Project construction Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-90 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, activities would not result in the exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the City's Municipal Code. Operational -Related Noise The Project proposes to develop the site with 23 residential townhomes. Residential land uses are not associated with the generation of substantial stationary noise. Any unusual noise generated by individual residents would be regulated by Section 10.28 (Loud and Unreasonable Noise) of the Municipal Code, and any future residents that violate the provisions of Section 10.28 would be subject to penalties as set forth in the ordinance. Accordingly, under long-term operating conditions, the Project would not result in the generation of substantial amounts of stationary noise that would violate the noise standards established in Municipal Code Section 10.26 (Community Noise Control). The Project also has the potential to result in noise increases off-site as a result of Project traffic. As discussed in more detail under the analysis of Transportation/Traffic (refer to Section 5.4.16), under existing conditions the commercial office and church uses are estimated to generate approximately 439 average daily vehicle trips (ADT). Under the proposed Project, the total amount of ADT would be reduced to 134 ADT, reflecting a net reduction in 305 ADT. As such, implementation of the proposed Project would result in a reduction in the amount of vehicular -related noise affecting off-site areas, and impacts would be less than significant. b) Would the Project result in the exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. Impacts associated with excessive ground -borne vibration or ground -borne noise levels during Project construction and long-term operation would be less than significant. Mitigation is not required. The only potential source of ground -borne vibration associated with the Project would occur as a result of construction activities, during which large machinery would be utilized in support of Project grading activities. However, construction activities associated with the proposed Project would not require the use of pile drivers, rock crushers, or blasting, which are the primary sources of vibration -related impacts during construction. As such, groundborne vibration and noise impacts during construction would be less than significant. Additionally, there are no sources of groundborne vibration or groundborne noise in the Project area, such as railroad lines. Accordingly, future Project residents also would not be subject to excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels. Based on these facts, impacts associated with excessive ground -borne vibration or ground -borne noise levels would be less than significant. c) Would the Project result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The Project would not result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity above levels existing without the Project. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. The Project proposes the construction and operation of 23 townhomes on the 1.2 -acre site. As indicated above under the discussion of Threshold a) of this section, residential uses do not generate substantial amounts of ambient noise. Any unusual noise generated by individual residents would be regulated by Section 10.28 (Loud and Unreasonable Noise) of the Municipal Code, and any future Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-91 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, residents that violate the provisions of Section 10.28 would be subject to penalties as set forth in the ordinance. The Project also has the potential to result in noise increases off-site as a result of Project traffic. Additionally, and as discussed in more detail under the analysis of Transportation/Traffic (refer to Section 5.4.16), the Project would generate less traffic than the uses that currently exist on the site, thereby reducing the amount of vehicular -related noise affecting off-site areas. Accordingly, the Project would not result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity above levels existing without the Project, and impacts would be less than significant. d) Would the Project result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Finding: Less than Significant Impact. With mandatory adherence to the timing provisions of Municipal Code § 10.28 during construction activities, Project impacts due to a temporary or periodic noise increase would be reduced to below a level of significance. As indicated above under the discussion of Thresholds a) and b) of this section, demolition of the existing buildings on-site and construction of the proposed Project would involve the use of heavy construction equipment that has the potential to result in a substantial temporary increase in ambient noise levels. However, construction noise is explicitly exempted from the noise standards specified in Municipal Code Section 10.26, provided such activities adhere to the timing restrictions specified in Section 10.28. There are no potential sources of temporary or periodic noise increases associated with long-term operation of the Project, as the Project would involve only the operation of 23 multifamily townhome units, which are not associated with the generation of substantial amounts of temporary or periodic noise increases. Accordingly, impacts would be less than significant. e) For a project located within an airport land use land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The Project would not expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive airport -related noise levels. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. The only airport in the vicinity of the Project site is John Wayne Airport (JWA). As shown on Figure N4 of the Newport Beach General Plan, and as similarly presented on the Airport Impact Zones exhibit of the AELUP, the Project site is not subject to airport -related noise levels exceeding 60 dBA CNEL (Newport Beach, 2006a, Figure N4; OCALUC, 2008, Appendix D). Accordingly, the Project would not expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive airport -related noise levels, and impacts would be less than significant. 0 For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Finding: No Impact. There would be no impact due to the exposure of people residing or working in the area to excessive noise levels associated with private airstrips. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. There are no private airstrips within the vicinity of the proposed Project site. Accordingly, there would be no impact due to the exposure of people residing or working in the area to excessive noise levels associated with private airstrips. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-92 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, 5.4.12.3 Noise: Mitigation Measures Implementation of the proposed Project would result in less -than -significant impacts to noise; accordingly, mitigation measures are not required. 5.4.13 Population and Housing 5.4.13.1 Population and Housing: Environmental Setting According to the United States Census Bureau (USCB), the City of Newport Beach was estimated to have a total population of approximately 86,484 persons as of 2011 (USCB, 2013). The City of Newport Beach is estimated to have an average of 2.19 residents per household (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.10-3). Under existing conditions, the Project site is occupied by commercial office and church land uses. There are no residences on-site under existing conditions. The commercial office building currently has vacancies and, therefore, does not generate its full capacity of employees. Based on estimates provided by SCAG for "low rise office" land uses (SCAG, 2001), the existing commercial office uses would generate approximately 92 employees if all spaces were occupied. 5.4.13.2 Population and Housing: Impact Analysis a) Would the Project induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The proposed Project would not directly or indirectly induce substantial population growth in the Project area. Impacts would be less than significant and mitigation is not required. According to the General Plan EIR, the City of Newport Beach has an average household size of 2.19 persons per household (pph) (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.10-3). The Project proposes to redevelop the site with 23 new multifamily townhomes, which would result in a population increase of approximately 50 persons (23 x 2.19 = 50.37). Although the Project would result in an increase in the City's population by approximately 50 persons, this increase represents only a 0.058% increase over the City's 2011 population ([50 — 85,484] x 100 = 0.058%). Additionally, none of the improvements proposed as part of the Project would foster an indirect increase in the City's population. The vicinity of the Project site is a mixed-use area that already includes a variety of land uses, including commercial Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-93 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Would the Project: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a) Induce substantial population growth in an ❑ ❑ 2 ❑ area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 5.4.13.1 Population and Housing: Environmental Setting According to the United States Census Bureau (USCB), the City of Newport Beach was estimated to have a total population of approximately 86,484 persons as of 2011 (USCB, 2013). The City of Newport Beach is estimated to have an average of 2.19 residents per household (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.10-3). Under existing conditions, the Project site is occupied by commercial office and church land uses. There are no residences on-site under existing conditions. The commercial office building currently has vacancies and, therefore, does not generate its full capacity of employees. Based on estimates provided by SCAG for "low rise office" land uses (SCAG, 2001), the existing commercial office uses would generate approximately 92 employees if all spaces were occupied. 5.4.13.2 Population and Housing: Impact Analysis a) Would the Project induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The proposed Project would not directly or indirectly induce substantial population growth in the Project area. Impacts would be less than significant and mitigation is not required. According to the General Plan EIR, the City of Newport Beach has an average household size of 2.19 persons per household (pph) (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.10-3). The Project proposes to redevelop the site with 23 new multifamily townhomes, which would result in a population increase of approximately 50 persons (23 x 2.19 = 50.37). Although the Project would result in an increase in the City's population by approximately 50 persons, this increase represents only a 0.058% increase over the City's 2011 population ([50 — 85,484] x 100 = 0.058%). Additionally, none of the improvements proposed as part of the Project would foster an indirect increase in the City's population. The vicinity of the Project site is a mixed-use area that already includes a variety of land uses, including commercial Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-93 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, office, retail, residential, and institution (church). The proposed Project is compatible with the surrounding land use mix and has little to no potential to induce increased population off-site. Based on this analysis, the proposed Project would not directly or indirectly induce substantial population growth in the Project area, and impacts would be less than significant. b) Would the Project displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Finding: No Impact. Implementation of the proposed Project would not displace any existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. There are no residences on-site under existing conditions. Accordingly, implementation of the proposed Project would not displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere, and no impact would occur. c) Would the Project displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Finding: No Impact. Implementation of the proposed Project would not displace any existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere, and no impact would occur. There are no persons living on-site under existing conditions. Accordingly, implementation of the proposed Project would not displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere, and no impact would occur. 5.4.13.3 Population and Housing: Mitigation Measures Implementation of the proposed Project would result in less -than -significant impacts or no impacts to population and housing; accordingly, mitigation measures are not required. 5.4.14 Public Services 5.4.14.1 Public Services: Environmental Setting Fire Protection The Newport Beach Fire Department (NBFD) provides fire protection services for the entire City, including the Project site. The NBFD is responsible for reducing loss of life and property from fire, Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-94 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Would the Project: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? ❑ ❑ Q ❑ b) Police protection? ❑ ❑ B ❑ c) Schools? ❑ ❑ Q ❑ d) Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ Q ❑ 5.4.14.1 Public Services: Environmental Setting Fire Protection The Newport Beach Fire Department (NBFD) provides fire protection services for the entire City, including the Project site. The NBFD is responsible for reducing loss of life and property from fire, Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-94 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, medical, and environmental emergencies. In addition to fire suppression, the NBFD also provides fire prevention and hazard reduction services. The Fire Prevention Division works in conjunction with the City's Planning, Public Works, and Building Departments to ensure that all new construction and remodels are built in compliance with local and State building and fire codes, including the provision of adequate emergency access and on-site fire protection measures. The City requires all businesses to be inspected annually for adherence to the fire and life safety codes. Further, the NBFD provides emergency medical services (EMS) from its three existing fire stations. Private ambulance services are also available within City limits. (Newport Beach, 2006b, pp. 4.11-2 and 4.11-3) Fire stations are strategically located throughout the City to provide prompt assistance to area residents. Each fire station operates within a specific district that comprises the immediate geographical area around the station. The Project site is served by Fire Station 2, located at 475 32nd Street, directly to the Project site's southwestern corner. (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.11-3) The NBFD has 140 full- time employees and approximately 200 seasonal employees providing 24-hour protection and response to the City's residents and visitors (Newport Beach, 2013b). As of 2005, the personnel to population ratio for fire protection services is approximately 0.48 firefighters for each 1,000 residents. However, personnel to population ratios are no longer considered by fire managers to be valid measurements of service. Irrespective of the personnel to population ratio, in the NBFD's estimation, the NBFD's staffing level adequately suits the current needs of the City's residential population. The response time to the Project site is very quick given the site's close proximity to Fire Station No. 2. (Newport Beach, 2006b, pp. 4.11-5 and 4.11-6) Police Protection The Newport Beach Police Department (NBPD) provides police services to the Project site under existing conditions. Centrally located at 870 Santa Barbara Drive approximately 2.75 miles northeast of the Project site, the NBPD provides services in crime prevention and investigation, community awareness programs, and other services such as traffic control. (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.11-12) The NBPD is currently separated into three divisions (Support Services, Patrol/Traffic, and Detectives), all of which are overseen by the Office of the Chief of Police. There are no current law enforcement staffing standards available. The NBPD currently has 149 sworn officers and 90 full time non -sworn personnel (Newport Beach, 2013c). According to census data for 2011, the City had approximately 86,484 persons (USCB, 2013). Thus, under existing conditions, the City has a ratio of 1.7 sworn officers per 1,000 residents (149 _ [86,484 = 1,000] = 1.7). The ratio of 1.7 officers per 1,000 residents allows the NBPD to meet the needs of a permanent and transient population that can swell to 200,000 on any given day. The increase in population is due to the influx of beachgoers, daytime employment, and visitors to the City. (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.11-13) Schools The Newport -Mesa Unified School District (NMUSD), with a service area of 58.83 square miles, provides educational services to the City of Newport Beach, City of Costa Mesa, and other unincorporated areas of Orange County. The Project site is located within the service boundaries for the NMUSD's Newport Elementary School (located 0.9 mile southeast of the Project site at 1327 W Balboa Blvd.), Horace Ensign Middle School (located 0.5 mile east of the Project site at 2000 Cliff Drive), and Newport Harbor High School (located 0.9 mile northeast of the Project site at 600 Irvine Avenue). According to the California Department of Education (CDE) website, the 2012-2013 enrollments for these schools are as follows: Newport Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-95 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Elementary School: 617 students; Horace Ensign Middle School: 1,136 students; and Newport Harbor High School: 2,396 students (CDE, 2013). According to the General Plan EIR, as of 2006, the NMUSD indicated that the school capacity within the District was adequate and the District projected no need for expansion of existing facilities (Newport Beach, 2006b, pp. 4.11-20 and 4.1 1-21). Leroy F. Greene School Facilities Act of 1998 (Public Education Code § 17072.10-18) The C. Leroy F. Greene School Facilities Act, CA. Education Code § 17070 et seq. establishes the base amount of allowable developer fees that are to be paid for impacts to public school districts. It also restricts local agencies from denying or placing conditions of approval on new developments due to school facilities, except for the imposition of impact fees. Libraries The Newport Beach Public Library (NBPL) provides library services and resources to the City of Newport Beach. NBPL consists of a Central Library and three branch library facilities located throughout the City. The Central Library, located at 1000 Avocado Avenue, was recently expanded in April 2013, which added 17,000 s.f. to the existing 54,000 s.f. facility. (Newport Beach, 2013e) The Mariners' Library branch, located at 2005 Dover Drive, opened in 2006 and features 15,305 s.f. of library space. Two smaller branches also serve the City, including the Balboa Branch Library, located at 100 East Balboa Boulevard with 6,000 s.f. of library space, and the Corona Del Mar Branch Library, located at 420 Marigold Avenue with 3,795 s.f. of library space. As of 2006, the system circulated 1,475,025 items annually and over 885,852 people visited the libraries in the NBPL system. (Newport Beach, 2006b, pp. 4.11-26 and 4.11-27) Typically, libraries assess their needs on a ratio of volumes per measure of population. However, as acknowledged by NBPL, the recent changes in the type of resources used at NBPL facilities (hardcopies vs. electronic documents) have made it increasingly difficult to predict the type and amount of resources required to adequately serve the local population. (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.11-27) The NBPL has indicated that within the next 20 years, the changing role of libraries in Newport Beach will need to be addressed with remodeling, expansion of existing buildings, and the possible construction of a new library branch. The NBPL anticipates that the Balboa Branch of the library may need to be expanded, remodeled, or rebuilt. (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.11-27) 5.4.14.2 Public Services: Impact Analysis a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered fire protection facilities, need for new or physically altered fire protection facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for fire protection? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The proposed Project would be adequately served by the City's existing fire protection facilities, and the Project would not result in nor require the expansion or construction of any new fire protection facilities. A less -than - significant impact would occur and mitigation is not required. Under existing conditions, the Project site's existing commercial office and church land uses generate a demand for fire protection services. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in an Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-96 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, increase in the site's existing demand for fire protection services. In fact, the demand for fire protection services might decrease under the Project, because less people would use the site (an estimated 50 residents plus visitors under the proposed Project compared to an office building with a capacity for approximately 92 employees and a church building with capacity for up to 560 seats under existing conditions). Additionally, the proposed Project's new townhome structures would be constructed in accordance with modern fire codes, and would replace older buildings that were constructed prior to the enactment of current fire codes and have fewer fire protection features than do modern construction. Moreover, the site is adjacent to Fire Station No. 2 and the NBFD has determined that the City's existing fire protection facilities are adequate to serve the City's future population (Newport Beach, 2006b, pp. 4.11-5 and 4.11-6). Although the Project would result in the relocation of one fire hydrant, the proposed relocation has been reviewed by the NBFD which determined that the new location would provide equal levels of fire protection to the site. Accordingly, implementation of the proposed Project would be adequately served by the City's existing fire protection facilities, and the Project would not result in nor require the expansion or construction of any new fire protection facilities. Therefore, a less -than -significant impact would occur. b) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered police protection facilities, need for new or physically altered police protection facilitiesthe construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for bolice protect on? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in nor require the expansion or construction of any new police protection facilities. Therefore, a less -than -significant impact would occur. Under existing conditions, the Project site's existing commercial office and church land uses generate a demand for police protection services. Upon implementation of the Project, the commercial office and church land uses would be demolished and replaced with townhomes. The Project proposes to develop the site with 23 new multifamily townhomes, which would result in a population increase of approximately 50 persons (23 x 2.19 = 50.37) (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.10-3). Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in an increase in the site's existing demand for police protection services. In fact, the demand for police protection services might decrease under the Project, because less people would use the site (an estimated 50 residents plus visitors under the proposed Project compared to an office building with a capacity for approximately 92 employees and a church building with capacity for up to 560 seats under existing conditions). Considering the small increase to the City's resident population, the Project would not measurably alter the City's ratio of officers to residents, which is currently 1.7 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. As noted in the General Plan EIR, the "...existing ratio of 1.7 officers per 1,000 residents allows the NBPD to meet the needs of a permanent and transient population" (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.11-13). Accordingly, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in nor require the expansion or construction of any new police protection facilities. Therefore, a less -than -significant impact would occur. c) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered school facilitiesneed for new or physically altered school facilities. the construction of which Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-97 ME O❑ Mitigated Negative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Analysis could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for schools? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The Project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered school facilities, need for new or physically altered school facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for schools. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Under existing conditions, the Project site is occupied by commercial office and church land uses, which do not generate any demand for school services. The Project would result in the construction of 23 multifamily townhomes on the site, which would generate a demand for school services. Based on the student generation rates assumed in the General Plan EIR, the Project's 23 multifamily townhomes would generate approximately five new elementary school students, three middle school students, and three high school students3 (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.11-23). Based on information from the City's 2006 General Plan EIR, the NMUSD determined that its existing student capacity is adequate to serve the projected student population, and the District had no plans for expansion of its school facilities to accommodate projected population growth. Additionally, the General Plan EIR notes that policies within the General Plan would assure the provision of appropriate school facilities as necessary to serve the City's growing population. Furthermore, the Project's projected increase to the demand for school services (i.e., five elementary school students, three middle school students, and three high school students) would not generate a demand for the construction or expansion of any school facilities. The Project applicant would be required to contribute school fees in accordance with Public Education Code § 17072.10-18. The provision of school fees would assist the NMUSD in meeting the Project's incremental demand for school services. Accordingly, and based on the foregoing analysis, the Project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered school facilities, need for new or physically altered school facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for schools. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. d) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of any other new or physically altered government facilities. need for any other new or physically altered government facilities the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any other types of public services? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The Project would result in less -than -significant impacts associated with the provision of any other new or physically altered government facilities, need for any other new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to 3 The General Plan EIR assumes that the 14,215 dwelling unit increase associated with the General Plan Update would result in 6,230 new students, consisting of 3,115 elementary school students, 1,557 middle school students, and 1,556 high school students. This represents a ratio of 0.219135 elementary students 0.109532 middle school students, and 0.109603 high school students per household. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-98 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any other types of public services. Mitigation is not required. Impacts to Public Libraries Under existing conditions, the Project site's existing commercial office and church land uses generate very little demand for library facilities. The existing Christian Science Reading Room offers religious materials to church patrons. Upon implementation of the Project, the commercial office and church land uses would be demolished and replaced with townhomes. The Project proposes to develop the site with 23 new multifamily townhomes, which would result in a population increase of approximately 50 persons (23 x 2.19 = 50.37) (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.10-3). As such, the demand for library services within the City would be incrementally increased as a result of the proposed Project's resident population increase. The General Plan Arts and Cultural Element does not establish any numeric standard for determining the amount of physical library space needed to serve the City's population. Additionally, given changes in technology (i.e., the use of electronic media in lieu of hard copy media), the demand for physical library space based on population -based projections is speculative. The Newport Beach Central library underwent a recent expansion to service the City's population and the addition of 50 persons to the City's population associated with the proposed Project has no potential to directly or indirectly create the need to construct a new future library or physically expand an existing library facility. Library services receive funding from property tax, a portion of which from the Project's tax assessment would be dedicated to the City's Library Fund (Newport Beach, 2012a, § 3.08.020). Based on the above analysis, the Project would result in less -than -significant impacts associated with the provision of any other new or physically altered government facilities, need for any other new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any other types of public services. Impacts to Recreational Facilities Impacts to recreational facilities are addressed under Section 5.4.15, Recreation, which concludes that the proposed Project would result in a less -than -significant impact to the City's park facilities. 5.4.14.3 Public Services: Mitigation Measures Implementation of the proposed Project would result in less -than -significant impacts to public services; accordingly, mitigation measures are not required. 5.4.15 Recreation Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-99 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a) Would the project increase the use of ❑ ❑ B ❑ existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-99 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, 5.4.15.1 Recreation: Environmental Setting Under existing conditions, the proposed Project site is developed with commercial office and church land uses. These land uses have only a nominal demand for parkland facilities, because most demand is generated by residential land uses. The City has approximately 286 acres of developed parks and approximately 90 acres of active beach recreation acreage, for a total of 376.8 acres. Newport Beach's parklands range in size from mini- parks such as the Lower Bay Park (0.1 acre) to the 47.6 -acre Bonita Canyon Sports Park. School facilities also provide indoor and outdoor recreational opportunities in the City, while greenbelts and open space areas provide passive recreational opportunities or open space relief. Additionally, bikeways, jogging trails, pedestrian trails, recreation trails, and regional equestrian trails are also available in Newport Beach. (Newport Beach, 2006b, pp. 4.12-1 and 4.12-2). According to Section 19.52.040 (Parkland Standard) of the City's Municipal Code, the City's parkland standard is five acres per 1,000 residents. According to census data for 2011, the City had approximately 86,484 persons (USCB, 2013). As such, under existing conditions, the City has a demand for approximately 432.42 acres parkland to serve the City's existing residents ([86,484 persons _ 1,000] x 5 acres = 432.42 acres). Thus, under existing conditions, the City has a deficit of approximately 56 acres. The Project site is located within the West Newport portion of the City, also identified as Service Area I for recreational uses. The General Plan EIR noted that there is a combined total of 43.1 acres of combined park and beach acreage within the West Newport Service Area, including 9.1 acres of parks. The General Plan EIR indicates that the West Newport Service Area had a 2006 demand for recreational facilities of 64.7 acres, resulting in a deficit of approximately 21.6 acres. (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.12-3) The General Plan EIR disclosed that the City had a total population of 83,120 persons in 2005, while in 2011 (the most recent year for which census estimates are available), the City's population was 86,484. This represents a total growth rate of approximately 1.04. Thus, if the demand for parkland facilities within Service Area I was 64.7 acres in 2005, then in 2011 it can conservatively be estimated that the demand for parkland facilities would be approximately 67.3 acres, reflecting a current deficit of approximately 24.2 acres within Service Area I. The nearest existing park facility to the Project site is Lido Park, located at the corner of Via Lido and Lafayette Avenue (approximately 230 feet southeast of the Project site). This facility comprises a passive recreational facility featuring benches and views of the Newport Bay. The City of Newport Beach also is currently planning on constructing a new park (Sunset Ridge Park) on a 13.67 acre site located at the northwest corner of the Pacific Coast Highway and Superior Avenue (approximately 0.6 mile northwest of the Project site. An EIR for the construction of this park facility Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-100 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No impact incorporated Impact Impact b) Does the project include recreational ❑ ❑ Q ❑ facilities or require the construction of or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? 5.4.15.1 Recreation: Environmental Setting Under existing conditions, the proposed Project site is developed with commercial office and church land uses. These land uses have only a nominal demand for parkland facilities, because most demand is generated by residential land uses. The City has approximately 286 acres of developed parks and approximately 90 acres of active beach recreation acreage, for a total of 376.8 acres. Newport Beach's parklands range in size from mini- parks such as the Lower Bay Park (0.1 acre) to the 47.6 -acre Bonita Canyon Sports Park. School facilities also provide indoor and outdoor recreational opportunities in the City, while greenbelts and open space areas provide passive recreational opportunities or open space relief. Additionally, bikeways, jogging trails, pedestrian trails, recreation trails, and regional equestrian trails are also available in Newport Beach. (Newport Beach, 2006b, pp. 4.12-1 and 4.12-2). According to Section 19.52.040 (Parkland Standard) of the City's Municipal Code, the City's parkland standard is five acres per 1,000 residents. According to census data for 2011, the City had approximately 86,484 persons (USCB, 2013). As such, under existing conditions, the City has a demand for approximately 432.42 acres parkland to serve the City's existing residents ([86,484 persons _ 1,000] x 5 acres = 432.42 acres). Thus, under existing conditions, the City has a deficit of approximately 56 acres. The Project site is located within the West Newport portion of the City, also identified as Service Area I for recreational uses. The General Plan EIR noted that there is a combined total of 43.1 acres of combined park and beach acreage within the West Newport Service Area, including 9.1 acres of parks. The General Plan EIR indicates that the West Newport Service Area had a 2006 demand for recreational facilities of 64.7 acres, resulting in a deficit of approximately 21.6 acres. (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.12-3) The General Plan EIR disclosed that the City had a total population of 83,120 persons in 2005, while in 2011 (the most recent year for which census estimates are available), the City's population was 86,484. This represents a total growth rate of approximately 1.04. Thus, if the demand for parkland facilities within Service Area I was 64.7 acres in 2005, then in 2011 it can conservatively be estimated that the demand for parkland facilities would be approximately 67.3 acres, reflecting a current deficit of approximately 24.2 acres within Service Area I. The nearest existing park facility to the Project site is Lido Park, located at the corner of Via Lido and Lafayette Avenue (approximately 230 feet southeast of the Project site). This facility comprises a passive recreational facility featuring benches and views of the Newport Bay. The City of Newport Beach also is currently planning on constructing a new park (Sunset Ridge Park) on a 13.67 acre site located at the northwest corner of the Pacific Coast Highway and Superior Avenue (approximately 0.6 mile northwest of the Project site. An EIR for the construction of this park facility Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-100 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, was certified by the Newport Beach City Council in 2010 (State Clearinghouse No. 200905 1 03 6)4. The EIR for the Sunset Ridge Park facility is hereby incorporated by reference pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15150. This facility, when complete, will include baseball fields, soccer fields, play area, a memorial garden, and other amenities. (Newport Beach, 2013d) Additionally, an active community park (possibly lighted) is planned in Banning Ranch, regardless of the ultimate development of the Banning Ranch site, to accommodate the service area and Citywide needs for active sports fields (Newport Beach, 2006b, p. 4.12-10). According to the Newport Banning Ranch Master Development Plan, new public park facilities within Banning Ranch would encompass approximately 26.8 acres (Newport Beach, 2011d, p. 3-9). An EIR for the Newport Banning Ranch Master Development Plan was certified by the Newport Beach City Council on July 23, 2012 (State Clearinghouse No. 2009031061), which is hereby incorporated by reference pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 151501. Upon completion of the Sunset Ridge Park and the park facilities within the Newport Banning Ranch Master Development Plan, Service Area I would be served with a total of 83.57 acres of parkland, which would exceed the 2006 estimated demand for 64.7 acres of parkland as disclosed by the General Plan EIR, and the 2011 estimated parkland demand of 67.3 acres as presented above. 5.4.15.2 Recreation: Impact Analysis a) Would the Project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. Adequate parkland facilities would be accommodated within Service Area I to meet the needs of existing and projected residents, including residents generated by the Project. Accordingly, the Project would not increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated. Impacts would be less than significant and mitigation is not required. Under existing conditions, the commercial office and church land uses at the site create only a nominal demand for recreational facilities. With implementation of the proposed Project, these existing uses would be demolished and replaced with 23 townhomes. Using the General Plan EIR's person per household rate of 2.19 persons per household (pph) the Project would result in an increase to the City's population of approximately 50 persons (23 x 2.19 = 50.37 persons). Future residents of the proposed Project site are likely to utilize Lido Park, located southeast of the Project site. However, Lido Park is a passive facility. The use of Lido Park by the Project's estimated 50 residents would not result in substantial deterioration to this existing facility. In addition, as part of the Project, 2,483 s.f. of common open space would be provided on-site, which would further help to meet the leisure recreational needs of future Project residents. Additionally, based on the City's Parkland Standard of five acres of parkland per 1,000 residents, the Project's estimated population increase of 50 persons would result in a demand for approximately 0.25 acre of parkland. Thus, with implementation of the proposed Project, the total demand for recreational facilities within Service Area I would increase from approximately 67.3 acres to 67.55 acres (based on the estimated demand using 2011 census information). This demand would be more than 4 Available for review at http://www.newportbeachca.gov/index.aspx?Dage=1347. 1 Available for review at http://www.newportbeachca.gov/index.aspx?Dage=2096. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-101 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, accommodated by the 83.57 acres of parkland provided by existing facilities, the proposed Sunset Ridge Park, and facilities planned as part of the Newport Banning Ranch Master Plan. Environmental impacts associated with the construction of the Sunset Ridge Park and Newport Banning Ranch Master Plan facilities were previously evaluated as part of EIRs that were certified by the Newport Beach City Council. Although it is possible that the Project may be occupied prior to completion of facilities within the Newport Banning Ranch Master Plan, the Project's incremental demand for parkland facilities (i.e., 50 new residents) would not result in a substantial increase in the use of existing facilities such that physical deterioration of those facilities would occur. In fact, the existing recreational resources that would serve future Project residents primarily comprise passive parks and beaches, which are unlikely to suffer physical deterioration as a result of the Project's planned population increase. Residential development would be required to pay the requisite Quimby Act fees, which would be used by the City to provide new parks and/or recreation facilities. Specifically, the Project would be required to contribute $26,125 per unit to the City's park funds, as required by City Council Resolution No. 2007-30, which would enable the City to provide for new or improved park facilities within the City to serve City residents and future residents of the Project. Accordingly, with completion of the planned facilities Service Area I would be served by sufficient park facilities to meet the City's Parkland Standard of five acres per 1,000 residents, including the addition of new residents generated by the Project. Additionally, there are adequate existing facilities within the City to serve future residents of the proposed Project, including, but not limited to, 38th Street Park, Channel Place Park, Sunset Ridge Park, Marina Park, Crystal Cove State Park, and the various beaches available along the City's coastline. The addition of 50 new residents, payment of park fees by the Project applicant, and buildout of planned recreational amenities within Service Area I would ensure that future Project residents do not result in the deterioration of existing facilities.Therefore, potential impacts to park and recreational facilities will be less than significant. b) Does the Project include recreational facilities or require the construction of or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The Project does not propose to construct any recreational facilities on-site, nor would the Project indirectly result in the need for new or expanded recreational facilities that could have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Accordingly, impacts would be less than significant and mitigation is not required. As indicated under the discussion and analysis of Threshold a) of this section, Service Area I would be served by sufficient park facilities when future facilities are included to meet the City's Parkland Standard of five acres per 1,000 residents, including the addition of new residents generated by the Project. Although new parkland facilities would be needed to meet the projected demand within Service Area I, the planned facilities were previously subjected to CEQA analysis as part of the EIRs prepared for the Sunset Ridge Park and Newport Banning Ranch Master Plan. The Project does not propose to construct any recreational facilities on-site, nor would the Project indirectly result in the need for new or expanded recreational facilities that could have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Accordingly, impacts would be less than significant. 5.4.15.3 Recreation: Mitigation Measures Implementation of the proposed Project would result in less -than -significant impacts to recreation; accordingly, mitigation measures are not required. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-102 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, 5.4.16 TransportatioNTraffic 5.4.16.1 Transportation/Tratfic: Environmental Setting Site Access Primary roadway access to the Project site is provided by Via Lido, located along the eastern Project boundary, and 32.d Street, located approximately 0.02 mile south of the Project site. Local access also is provided by Via Oporto, located along the western Project boundary, and Via Malaga, located along the southern Project boundary. These local streets provide access to Newport Boulevard, which provides access to State Highway I, located approximately 0.25 mile north of the Project site, and State Route 55 (SR -55), located approximately 2.0 miles north of the Project site. Level of Service (LOS) Standards The City of Newport Beach General Plan establishes level of service (LOS) "D" as the standard for most intersections. LOS "E" is the established standard for a limited number of intersections (Newport Beach, 2006a, p. 7-6). Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-103 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Would the Protect: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 management program, including, but not limited to level of service standard and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, ❑ ❑ ❑ Z including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access. ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or ❑ ❑ ❑ p programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities? 5.4.16.1 Transportation/Tratfic: Environmental Setting Site Access Primary roadway access to the Project site is provided by Via Lido, located along the eastern Project boundary, and 32.d Street, located approximately 0.02 mile south of the Project site. Local access also is provided by Via Oporto, located along the western Project boundary, and Via Malaga, located along the southern Project boundary. These local streets provide access to Newport Boulevard, which provides access to State Highway I, located approximately 0.25 mile north of the Project site, and State Route 55 (SR -55), located approximately 2.0 miles north of the Project site. Level of Service (LOS) Standards The City of Newport Beach General Plan establishes level of service (LOS) "D" as the standard for most intersections. LOS "E" is the established standard for a limited number of intersections (Newport Beach, 2006a, p. 7-6). Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-103 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Existing Traffic Conditions According to General Plan EIR Figure 4.13-3, as of 2006 Via Lido experienced approximately 11,000 average daily trips (ADT), with a volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio of 0.25, while Newport Road experienced approximately 53,000 ADT north of Via Lido and 36,000 ADT south of Via Lido, reflecting a v/c ratio of 0.94 and 0.71, respectively. The intersection of Via Lido at Newport Road was identified as having a level of service (LOS) of A and the intersection of Newport Boulevard and 32nd Street was identified as having a LOS of C during both the morning and evening peak hours, which is well above the General Plan's standard of LOS D or better. (Newport Beach, 2006b, pp. 4.13-6 through 4.13-11) Public Transit Under existing conditions, the nearest transit service to the Project site is available along Newport Boulevard. Transit service is not provided along the roadways that directly about the Project site (Newport Beach, 2006b, Figure 4.13-6). Bicycle Facilities According to General Plan EIR Figure 4.13-7, designated bicycle facilities within the Project area include sidewalk bikeways along the Lido Bridge and along Newport Boulevard and West Coast Highway (Newport Beach, 2006b, Figure 4.13-7). Orange County Congestion Management Program The Orange County Transit Authority's (OCTA) 2011 Congestion Management Program (CMP) is intended to support regional mobility and air quality objectives by reducing traffic congestion. The CMP also provides a mechanism for coordinating land use and development decisions that support the regional economy, and is used to determine gas tax eligibility. The CMP establishes LOS E or better as the standard for evaluating impacts at CMP Highway System intersections. (OCTA, 2011, pp. I and 5) Existing Airport Facilities The nearest aviation facility to the proposed Project site is the John Wayne International Airport UWA), located approximately 4.4 miles northeast of the proposed Project site. According to the Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) for the JWA, the Project site is not located within the Airport Planning Area, the Airport Impact Zones, the AELUP Notification Area for JWA, or the Airport Safety Zones (OCALUC, 2008, Figure I and Appendix D). The Project site is, however, located within the FAR Part 77 Obstruction Imaginary Surfaces and Notification Area for the JWA. The "notification surface" is defined by the AELUP by extending a slope at a gradient of 100:1 (horizontal to vertical) from the airport facility. If a development application would protrude into the notification surface, then notification to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) would be required. (OCALUC, 2008, Page 13 anclAppendix D) City of Newport Beach Municipal Code Guidelines and provisions related to transportation are addressed in the following sections of the Municipal Code: Title 12 (Vehicles and Traffic); Chapter 15.38 (Fair Share Traffic Contribution Ordinance); Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance); and Chapter 20.64 (Transportation Demand Management Ordinance). Each of these sections of the Municipal Code is briefly discussed below. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-104 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Titie 12, Vehicles and Trak Title 12 addresses traffic and parking enforcement, as well as safety programs, trails programs, bicycle use, skateboarding use, and other temporary traffic and parking protocols. Chapter 15.38, Fair Share Trak Contribution Ordinance Chapter 15.38 was established by the City Council to establish a fee, based upon the unfunded cost to implement the Master Plan of Streets and Highways, to be paid in conjunction with the issuance of a building permit. The ordinance sets forth procedures for calculating the fair -share amounts for residential projects, hotel/motels, and office/retail/commercial uses, which are adopted by City Council resolution. Chapter 15.40, Trak Phasing Ordinance Section 15.40 was established by the City Council to ensure that the effects of new development projects are mitigated by developers as they occur. Specifically, the ordinance was established to provide a uniform method of analyzing and evaluating the traffic impacts of projects that generate a substantial number of average daily trips and/or trips during the morning or evening peak hour period; to identify the specific and near-term impacts of project traffic as well as circulation system improvements that will accommodate project traffic and ensure that development is phased with identified circulation system improvements; to ensure that project proponents, as conditions of approval, make or fund circulation system improvements that mitigate the specific impacts of project traffic on primary intersections at or near the time the project is ready for occupancy; and to provide a mechanism for ensuring that a project proponent's cost of complying with traffic related conditions of project approval is roughly proportional to project impacts. Section 15.40.030 (Standards for Approval — Findings — Exemptions) specifically exempts the following project types from compliance with the Traffic Phasing Ordinance: a) projects that generate three hundred (300) or fewer average daily trips; b) projects that do not increase trips by one percent or more on any leg of any primary intersection during any evening or morning peak hour; and c) any project that meets certain other criteria as specified in the Ordinance. Chapter 20.64, Transportation Demand Management Requirements The Transportation Demand Management requirements apply to all new, nonresidential development projects that are estimated to employ a total of one hundred (100) or more persons, or the current limit set forth by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) in Rule 2202, whichever is lower at the time of project submittal. As such, Chapter 20.64 is not applicable to the proposed Project. Existing Project Site Traffic According to information provided by the City of Newport Beach Transportation and Development Services Division (TDSD), under existing conditions the Project site generates approximately 439 ADT, as shown in Table 5-9, Existing Site Daily Trak. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-105 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Table 5-9 Existing Site Daily Traffic Land Use Size Unit' AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Total In Out Tota► ►n Out rasa► Church 8.961 TSF 3 2 5 2 3 5 82 Office 32.469 TSF 44 6 50 8 40 48 357 Total: 47 8 55 11 43 S3 439 I. TSF = Thousand Square Feet. Note: AM Peak Hour, PM Peak Hour, and Daily Total reflect the number of trips. Source: Newport Beach TDSD (refer to Appendix F). 5.4.16.2 Transportation/Traffic: Impact Analysis a) Would the Project conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? Finding: No Impact. The proposed Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. Table 5-10, Comparison of Existing versus Proposed Daily Trak, provides a comparison of the Project site's existing daily and peak hour traffic volumes with those that are projected to occur under the proposed Project. As shown, implementation of the proposed Project would result in a net reduction of 46 morning peak hour trips, 41 evening peak hour trips, and 305 total daily trips. Accordingly, Project implementation would result in a net decrease in the amount of traffic the Project site contributes to area intersections and roadway segments, indicating that the Project would result in a slight improvement to the performance of area intersections and roadway segments as compared to existing conditions. Table 5-10 Comparison of Existing versus Proposed Daily Traffic Land Use Size Univ AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Total In Out Total In Out Total Existing Land Uses Church 8.961 TSF 3 2 5 2 3 5 82 Office 32.469 TSF 44 6 50 8 40 48 357 Sub -Total (Existing): 47 8 55 ll 43 53 439 Proposed Land Uses Residential Condo 23 DU 1 8 9 8 4 12 134 Net Change (Proposed — Existing): -46 0 -46 -3 -39 -41 -305 I. TSF = Thousand Square Feet; DU = Dwelling Units Note: AM Peak Hour, PM Peak Hour, and Daily Total reflect the number of trips. Source: Newport Beach TDSD (refer to Appendix F). The City of Newport Beach General Plan establishes LOS "D" as the standard for most intersections, and allows LOS "E" at a limited number of intersections. However, because the Project would generate less traffic under proposed conditions than existing conditions, it has no potential to degrade the Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-106 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, existing LOS at any area intersection or road segment, and would therefore not result in a conflict with the General Plan's LOS standard. In addition, the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 15.40) requires mitigation for any traffic effects caused by new development. However, the proposed Project results in a net reduction in vehicular trips from the site (as shown in Table 5-10). Traffic Phasing Ordinance § I5.40.030.0 (Exemptions) specifically exempts projects that generate no more than 300 ADT. Accordingly, the proposed Project is exempt from the provisions of the Traffic Phasing Ordinance, and no conflict would occur. Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, and no impact would occur. b) Would the Project conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standard and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Finding: No Impact. The Project would not conflict with the OCTA CMP's level of service standards or travel demand measures, and no impact would occur. The OCTA CMP is the applicable congestion management program for the City of Newport Beach. Pursuant to the CMP, an individual project would result in significant impacts to traffic if it causes the LOS of any CMP Highway System intersections to degrade to below a LOS E, or if it generates sufficient traffic that contributes to a facility already operating below the threshold. As indicated in Table 5-10, implementation of the proposed Project would result in a net reduction in morning and evening peak hour trips, and also would result in a net reduction in the total daily traffic generated by the site. As such, the Project has no potential to cause any CMP Highway System intersection to degrade below LOS E, nor would the Project contribute a substantial amount of traffic to any CMP Highway System intersection that already operates below LOS E under existing conditions. Additionally, although the CMP sets forth travel demand measures that promote the use of alternative modes of transportation, none of the travel demand measures specified in the CMP are directly applicable to the proposed Project. Accordingly, the Project would not conflict with the OCTA CMP's level of service standards or travel demand measures, and no impact would occur. c) Would the Project result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? Finding: No Impact. There are no components of the proposed Project that would result in an increase in traffic levels or result in substantial safety risks. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. The only airport within the Project vicinity is the JWA, which is located approximately 4.4 miles northeast of the Project site. According to the AELUP for the JWA, the Project site is not located within the Airport Planning Area, the Airport Impact Zones, the AELUP Notification Area for JWA, or the Airport Safety Zones (OCALUC, 2008, Figure I and Appendix D). Accordingly, and based on the AELUP, the Project would not occur in a location that results in a substantial safety risk for future Project residents. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-107 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, The Project site is located within the FAR Part 77 Obstruction Imaginary Surfaces and Notification Area for the JWA, which is defined by extending a slope at a gradient of 100:1 (horizontal to vertical) from the JWA. The nearest portion of the JWA to the Project site is located at a grade elevation of approximately 53 feet above mean sea level (amsl) (Google Earth, 2011). Since the Project site is located approximately 23,050 feet from the JWA, the notification surface above the Project site is approximately 283.5 feet amsl ([23,050 feet = 100] + 53 feet amsl = 283.5 feet amsl). The highest grade elevation of the Project site is approximately 11.0 feet, and the maximum elevation of architectural projections for the proposed buildings would be 39 feet; thus, proposed buildings on-site would extend to a maximum height of 50 feet ams1, which is well below the FAR Part 77 notification surface. Accordingly, buildings proposed by the Project have no potential to disrupt air traffic patterns. d) Would the Project substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g, sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g, farm equipment)? Finding: No Impact. The Project would not substantially increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. The proposed Project does not involve any improvements to off-site roadways or intersections, with exception of the construction of the Project's sewer connection within Via Lido and improvements associated with Project driveways. Construction of the sewer connection would be below the street surface, and would have no effect on safety for motorists traveling along Via Lido. Similarly, the relocation of driveway access points on-site would not increase design hazards, and the proposed driveways would provide for adequate site distance. All improvements on-site would consist of private driveways and drive aisles that similarly would have no impact on abutting roadways. Accordingly, the Project would not increase hazards due to a design feature. The Project consists of the development of 23 multifamily townhomes within a portion of the City of Newport Beach that includes residential, commercial, private institutions, and public facility land uses. There are no components of the Project that would increase hazards to the public due to incompatible use, as the residential uses proposed by the Project would be fully compatible with surrounding land uses. e) Would the Project result in inadequate emergency access? Finding: No Impact. The Project would result in adequate emergency access. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. As indicated in Section 3.0, the Project proposes an on-site drive aisle that accommodates a 20 -foot emergency access route to facilitate emergency access to the site. Additionally, the Project would not require the complete closure of any public or private streets or roadways during construction, although the western half of Via Lido would be temporarily closed northerly of Via Malaga for two weeks during the construction of the Project's sewer connection. During the construction within Via Lido, traffic control measures would be required pursuant to Chapter 12.62 (Temporary Street Closure) of the City's Municipal Code. Accordingly, temporary construction activities would not impede use of the road for emergencies or access for emergency response vehicles. Therefore, the Project would not result in inadequate emergency access, and no impact would occur. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-108 ME O❑ Mitigated Negative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Analysis f) Would the Project conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or Pedestrian facilities? Finding: No Impact. The proposed project would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. The General Plan Circulation Element includes a number of goals and policies related to public transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. These include the policies identified under General Plan Circulation Element Goal CE 4.1 (Public Transportation) and CE 5.1 (Alternative Transportation Modes). A brief discussion of Circulation Element Policies that are applicable to the proposed Project is provided below. Policy CE 4.1.4: Land Use Densities Supporting Public Transit. Accommodate residential densities sufficient to support transit patronage, especially in mixed use areas such as the Airport Area. Project Consistenc4. The Project proposes to develop the site with 23 multifamily townhomes on the 1.2 -acre site, resulting in a density of approximately 19.2 dwelling units per acre. This level of density would support transit patronage within the Project area, which is characterized as a mixed-use neighborhood. Accordingly, the Project would be consistent with Circulation Element Policy CE 4.1.4. Policy CE 5.1.1: Trail System. Promote construction of a comprehensive trail system as shown on Figure CE4. Project Consistency: According to Figure CE4 of the Circulation Element, the Project site and abutting streets are not identified as part of the City's Bikeways Master Plan. The Lido Island Bridge is the nearest road segment identified by Figure CE4 as part of the Bikeways Master Plan, which calls for a "Class I Off-road Paved" bike trail. This facility already is accommodated across the bridge under existing conditions, and the Project would not impact the existing bike trail (Google Earth, 2011). Accordingly, the Project would not conflict with Policy CE 5. I. I. Policy CE 5.1.2: Pedestrian Connectivity. Link residential areas, schools, parks, and commercial centers so that residents can travel within the community without driving. Project Consistency As occurs under existing conditions, the Project is served by existing sidewalks along Via Lido, Via Oporto, and Via Malaga, which provides connections to sidewalks and trail facilities located off-site. Although the Project would relocate all of the existing driveway locations, such improvements would have no impact on the availability of these sidewalks upon the completion of Project construction. Additionally, the Project has been designed to accommodate the potential future pedestrianization of Via Oporto and portions of Via Malaga, although such improvements are not proposed as part of the Project and no plans for such improvements have been approved by the City. Accordingly, the Project would be consistent with Circulation Element Policy CE 5.1.2. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-109 Mitigated Negative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Analysis Policy CE 5.1.3: Pedestrian Improvements in New Development Projects. Require new development projects to include safe and attractive sidewalks, walkways, and bike lanes in accordance with the Master Plan, and, if feasible, trails. Project Consistency The Project site is only 1.2 acres in size, which limits the ability of the proposed development to provide for substantial pedestrian amenities (trails, etc.). Nonetheless, the Project has been designed such that all dwelling units feature porches along abutting streets, with enhanced paving provided along walkways leading to the existing sidewalks along Via Lido, Via Malaga, and Via Oporto. Additionally, as indicated under the analysis of Project consistency with Circulation Element Policy CE 4.1.4, the Project site is not identified by the Bikeways Master Plan for any facilities or improvements, although sidewalks are provided along the Project's frontage. The Project would not remove the existing sidewalks, although the driveway access points would be relocated as part of the Project. Bicycles will continue to have access along abutting roadways. Accordingly, the Project would be consistent with Circulation Element Policy 5.1.3. Policy CE 5.1.4: Linkages to Citywide Trail Systems and Neighborhoods. Require developers to construct links to the planned trail system, adjacent areas, and communities where appropriate. Project Consistency: As indicated under the analysis of Project consistency with Circulation Element Policy CE 4.1.4, the Project site is not identified by the Bikeways Master Plan for any facilities or improvements, although sidewalks are provided along the Project's frontage (and would be maintained as part of the proposed development), and bicycles will continue to have access along abutting roadways. Sidewalk and bicycle access would facilitate access to the City's planned trail system, adjacent areas, and surrounding communities. Accordingly, the Project would be consistent with Circulation Element Policy 5.1.4. The remaining Circulation Element policies related to public transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities provide general direction to City staff and/or decision -makers, or are otherwise not applicable to the proposed Project. There are no other adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities. Accordingly, the proposed Project would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, and no impact would occur. 1.4.1.1 TransportatioNTraffic: Mitigation Measures Implementation of the proposed Project would result in no impacts to transportation/traffic; accordingly, mitigation measures are not required. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-110 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, 5.4.17 Utilities and Service Systems 5.4.17.1 Ufllities and Service Systems: Environmental Setting Domestic Water Supply A large majority of the City of Newport Beach, including 35.77 square miles and the proposed Project site, receives domestic water service from the City of Newport Beach. The City receives its water from two main sources: 1) local groundwater from the Lower Santa Ana River Groundwater basin, which is managed by the Orange County Water District (OCWD) and pumped from four active wells owned and operated by the City of Newport Beach (60%), and 2) imported water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) as wholesaled to the City by the Metropolitan Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) (37%). In addition to these two main supply sources, the City also uses a small amount of recycled water for irrigation purposes (3%). Detailed information about these water supply sources are contained in the City of Newport Beach 2010 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), which is herein incorporated by reference and available for public review at the City of Newport Beach Public Works Department, 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California 92660. The City's UWMP calculates that water demand in the City will increase by I I% over the 25 period of 2010 — 2035, to 18,474 acre-feet of water demand City-wide by 2035. The UWMP also documents that the City has entitlements to sufficient water supplies to serve its existing and projected demand. (Newport Beach, 2011 a) Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-111 Less Than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Would the Project: impact Incorporated Impact Impact a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? ❑ ❑ Q ❑ b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? ❑ ❑ ❑ E0 C) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? ❑ ❑ B ❑ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? ❑ ❑ Iz ❑ e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? ❑ ❑ R1 ❑ f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? ❑ ❑✓❑ ❑ g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulation related to solid waste? ❑ ❑ Q ❑ 5.4.17.1 Ufllities and Service Systems: Environmental Setting Domestic Water Supply A large majority of the City of Newport Beach, including 35.77 square miles and the proposed Project site, receives domestic water service from the City of Newport Beach. The City receives its water from two main sources: 1) local groundwater from the Lower Santa Ana River Groundwater basin, which is managed by the Orange County Water District (OCWD) and pumped from four active wells owned and operated by the City of Newport Beach (60%), and 2) imported water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) as wholesaled to the City by the Metropolitan Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) (37%). In addition to these two main supply sources, the City also uses a small amount of recycled water for irrigation purposes (3%). Detailed information about these water supply sources are contained in the City of Newport Beach 2010 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), which is herein incorporated by reference and available for public review at the City of Newport Beach Public Works Department, 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California 92660. The City's UWMP calculates that water demand in the City will increase by I I% over the 25 period of 2010 — 2035, to 18,474 acre-feet of water demand City-wide by 2035. The UWMP also documents that the City has entitlements to sufficient water supplies to serve its existing and projected demand. (Newport Beach, 2011 a) Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-111 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Applicable Water Conservation Programs A Water Conservation Ordinance was adopted by the Newport Beach City Council in 2009 and is included in the City's Municipal Code as Chapter 14.16, "Water Conservation and Supply Level Regulations." The Ordinance creates a Water Conservation and Supply Shortage Program that establishes four levels of water supply shortage response actions to be implemented during times of declared water shortage. Additionally, Chapter 14.17 (Water -Efficient Landscaping) of the City's Municipal Code requires the use of water efficient landscaping as part of new or rehabilitated projects. To verify compliance with the provisions of Chapter 14.17, landscape documentation packages must be submitted to the City for review and approval. The City reviews the landscape documentation packages for compliance with the provisions of the design standards set forth in Section 14.17.030 (Landscape Water Use Standards). The City of Newport Beach is a signatory to the California Urban Water Conservation Council's (CUWCC) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and implements Demand Management Measures (DMMs) to satisfy the requirements of MOU Section 10631 (f) & (j). Many DMMs also are administered by the MWDOC on behalf of its member agencies, including the City of Newport Beach. SBx7-7 (Senate Bill 7 as part of the Seventh Extraordinary Session), "The Water Conservation Bill of 2009", was signed into law on February 3, 2010, as part of a comprehensive statewide water legislation package. MWDOC and 26 of its member agencies, including the City of Newport Beach, as well as the cities of Anaheim, Fullerton, and Santa Ana have created the Orange County 20x2020 Regional Alliance in an effort to help meet the water use reduction targets required by SBx7-7. With MWDOC's assistance, the City of Newport Beach selected to comply with Option I of the SBx7-7 compliance options, which requires a 20% reduction from baseline water usage by 2020 and 10% by 2015. The City's baseline, calculated from the ten year period July I, 1995 to June 30, 2005, is 253 gallons per capita per day (GPCD). Thus, the City's 2015 interim water use target is 228.1 GPCD and the 2020 final water use target is 202.8 GPCD (Newport Beach, 201 la, pp. 2-6 through 2-8). Wastewater System A majority of the City of Newport Beach, including 13.5 square miles and the proposed Project site, receives wastewater service from the City of Newport Beach. The City of Newport Beach has a Sewer System Management Plan and Sewer Master Plan that project future wastewater demands, plan for physical improvements to the wastewater collection system, and detail how wastewater is planned to be collected and treated. Wastewater from the City of Newport Beach's sewer system is treated by the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD). A majority of the City's sewage flow, including flows from the Project site, is conveyed to OCSD Treatment Plant No. 2, which has a design capacity of 276 million gallons per day (mgd) and operates under capacity. Wastewater treated by the OCSD at Plant No. 2 is required to be treated in accordance with federal, state, and regional requirements for water quality prior to being discharged into the Pacific Ocean. Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Under existing conditions, the existing church, church reading room, and commercial office building on the Project site are provided domestic water and sewer services by the City of Newport Beach. Subsurface sewer lines, domestic water lines, water meters, and fire hydrants are located on the property. On-site infrastructure connects to an existing 15 -inch sewer main beneath the Via Lido right- of-way and a 6 -inch domestic water line beneath the Via Opporto right-of-way. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-112 No 0❑ Mitigated Negative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Analysis Drainage Infrastructure Under existing conditions, surface storm water runoff flows from the southwestern corner of the Project site generally traverses across site in a southeasterly direction, and is discharged off-site into surface gutters along Via Malaga. Surface stormwater flows from all other portions of the site generally traverse the across site in a northwesterly direction and are discharged off-site into surface gutters along Via Lido and Via Oporto, which empty into an off-site catch basin before discharging into Newport Bay (C&V Consulting, 2013a, Section III). For more information, refer to Section 5.4.9, Hydrology and Water Quality. Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Pursuant to Newport Beach Municipal Code § 12.63.030, solid waste is collected in the City by franchise waste haulers that have formal agreements with the City to collect its solid waste. The Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary Landfill, located at 11002 Bee Canyon Access Road in the City of Irvine, serves the City of Newport Beach. This landfill is 725 acres in size with 534 acres permitted for refuse disposal. It is permitted to receive a daily maximum of 11,500 tons per day and has enough capacity to remain in operation until at least 2053. Public Resources Code § 40000 et seq. requires that local jurisdictions divert at least 50 percent of all solid waste generated. The City of Newport Beach consistently meets the objective of Public Resources Code §40000 et seq. Commercial waste haulers within the City are subject to Municipal Code Section 12.63.120 (Recycling Requirement), which states, "No person providing commercial solid waste handling services or conducting a solid waste enterprise shall deposit fifty (50) percent or more of the solid waste collected by the person in the City at any landfill." All solid waste generated by the Project would be collected by City services in compliance with Municipal Code Section 12.63.120 to ensure that a minimum of fifty percent of the solid waste collected is diverted from landfills, either through source separation by City residents or through separation of recyclable materials following collection. Residents will be provided with recycling containers. Furthermore, Municipal Code Section 20.30.120 (Solid Waste and Recyclable Materials Storage), mandates that all multi -unit projects with five or more dwelling units "...provide enclosed refuse and recyclable material storage areas with solid roofs." 5.4.17.2 Utilities and Service Systems: Project Impacts a) Would the Project exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The proposed Project would demand less wastewater treatment capacity than is demanded by the site under existing conditions. Impacts would be less than significant and mitigation is not required. The Project's proposed PC includes a preliminary utility plan that depicts the location of existing off-site and proposed on-site sewer lines that would service the Project. Sewer lines installed on the site would connect to an existing 15 -inch sewer main beneath the Via Lido right-of-way. The composition of wastewater generated by the Project is assumed to be typical of other residential uses in the City, consisting of domestically generated wastewater with little to no hazardous materials or components present. As occurs under existing conditions, wastewater would be collected by the City of Newport Beach sewer system and conveyed to OCSD Treatment Plant No. 2, which has a design capacity of 276 million gallons per day (mgd) and operates under capacity. Wastewater treatment demand generated by the proposed Project generally would be less than is demanded by the site under existing conditions. As Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-113 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, shown on Table 5-11, Existing and Proposed Wastewater Treatment Demand, the Project would generate approximately 172,800 gpd, while the site's existing land uses are estimated to generate between 150,000 to 600,000 gpd (C&V Consulting, 2013c). As such, the Project likely would reduce demand on OCSD Treatment Plant No. 2 and would not directly or indirectly cause OCSD to exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. Table 5-11 Existing and Proposed Wastewater Treatment Demand Keter to the Preliminary Sewer Analysis contained within Appendix G for sewer generation estimates. b) Would the Project require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Finding: No Impact. The proposed Project would not result in the construction or expansion of new water or wastewater treatment facilities. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. As discussed above under Threshold I, the proposed Project would demand less wastewater treatment capacity than is demanded by the site under existing conditions. Thus, the Project has no potential to require or result in the construction or expansion of wastewater treatment facilities. Similarly, as shown previously in Table 5-8, the Project would demand less domestic water than demanded by the site under existing conditions. With exception of a single fire hydrant along Via Malaga that would be relocated as part of the Project to accommodate the Project's driveway access, all other existing fire hydrants would remain on the property and would not be relocated or demand any more water than demanded under existing conditions. The relocated fire hydrant also would not result in a net increase in demand for water. The existing fire hydrants are estimated to have a calculated flow of 3,575 gallons per minute (gpm) at 20 pounds per square inch (psi). As such, the Project has no potential to require or result in the construction or expansion of water treatment facilities. No impact would occur. c) Would the Project require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The proposed Project would install new storm water drainage infrastructure on the site, the impacts of which are addressed throughout this document and would be less than significant. No off-site facilities or expansion of existing off-site facilities would occur. Mitigation is not required. As part of the proposed Project, storm water infrastructure would be constructed on-site, the installation of which is inherent in the Project's construction process which is analyzed throughout this document. As discussed previously in Section 5.4.9, Hydrology and Water Quality, the Project's storm water would be collected by gutters within existing streets (Via Lido, Via Oporto, and Via Malaga), as occurs under existing conditions. The gutters in these streets would convey the water to an existing Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-114 Existing Land Uses Commercial Office 32,469 s.f. 150,000 to 600,000 gpd Church 8,961 s.f. Total Wastewater (Existing Land Uses): 150,000 to 600,000 gpd Proposed Land Uses Multifamily Residential 23 du 172,800 gpd Net Change in Sewer Generation with Project Implementation: +22,800 to -427,200 gpd Keter to the Preliminary Sewer Analysis contained within Appendix G for sewer generation estimates. b) Would the Project require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Finding: No Impact. The proposed Project would not result in the construction or expansion of new water or wastewater treatment facilities. No impact would occur and mitigation is not required. As discussed above under Threshold I, the proposed Project would demand less wastewater treatment capacity than is demanded by the site under existing conditions. Thus, the Project has no potential to require or result in the construction or expansion of wastewater treatment facilities. Similarly, as shown previously in Table 5-8, the Project would demand less domestic water than demanded by the site under existing conditions. With exception of a single fire hydrant along Via Malaga that would be relocated as part of the Project to accommodate the Project's driveway access, all other existing fire hydrants would remain on the property and would not be relocated or demand any more water than demanded under existing conditions. The relocated fire hydrant also would not result in a net increase in demand for water. The existing fire hydrants are estimated to have a calculated flow of 3,575 gallons per minute (gpm) at 20 pounds per square inch (psi). As such, the Project has no potential to require or result in the construction or expansion of water treatment facilities. No impact would occur. c) Would the Project require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The proposed Project would install new storm water drainage infrastructure on the site, the impacts of which are addressed throughout this document and would be less than significant. No off-site facilities or expansion of existing off-site facilities would occur. Mitigation is not required. As part of the proposed Project, storm water infrastructure would be constructed on-site, the installation of which is inherent in the Project's construction process which is analyzed throughout this document. As discussed previously in Section 5.4.9, Hydrology and Water Quality, the Project's storm water would be collected by gutters within existing streets (Via Lido, Via Oporto, and Via Malaga), as occurs under existing conditions. The gutters in these streets would convey the water to an existing Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-114 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, off-site catch basin as occurs under existing conditions. As detailed in a Project -specific Hydrology Report included in Technical Appendix C, the Project would not increase the volume or velocity of water discharged from the site. As such, the Project would not require or result in the construction or expansion of any off-site storm water drainage infrastructure. d) Would the Project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The proposed Project would demand less water than is demanded by the site under existing conditions and sufficient water supplies would be available from existing entitlements and resources. Impacts would be less than significant and mitigation is not required. As discussed above under Threshold b) of this section and as shown in Table 5-8, the Project would demand less water than demanded by the site under existing conditions. Additionally, the existing number of hydrants would remain on the property and one fire hydrant would be relocated, which would not result in a demand for any more water than occurs under existing conditions. The site's existing uses are considered in the City's Urban Water Management Plan, which concludes that the City has entitlements to sufficient water supplies to serve it existing and projected demand. Because less water would be demanded by the site upon Project implementation, there is no potential that the Project could have a significant adverse impact on water supply sufficiency. e) Would the Project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The proposed Project would demand less wastewater treatment capacity than is demanded by the site under existing conditions. Impacts would be less than significant and mitigation is not required. As discussed above under Thresholds a) and b) of this section, the proposed Project would demand less wastewater treatment capacity than is demanded by the site under existing conditions. Thus, the Project has no potential to adversely affect the physical capacity of the existing wastewater infrastructure system that services the site. City of Newport Beach sewer collection system and the OCSD Treatment Plant No. 2 have adequate capacity considering existing and projected commitments and the Project's reduction in wastewater volume that would be generated from the site. 0 Would the Project be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The Project would be served by the Frank R. Bowerman Landfill, which has sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the Project's solid waste disposal needs. Impacts would be less than significant and mitigation is not required. In order to construct the proposed Project, existing buildings and associated site improvements located on the property would be demolished and cleared from the site. In total, 41,430 gross s.f. of building area and an existing 54 -space off-street parking lot and landscape and hardscape areas would be removed to prepare the site for redevelopment. Demolition debris generated as part of the Project are estimated to be 1,905.78 tons, which would be disposed of over the course of approximately two Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-115 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, months at the Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary Landfill, which serves the City (Wieland-Davco Corporation, 2013). The landfill has a permitted capacity of 1 1,500 tons per day and can accommodate the projected amount of debris to be deposited resulting in a less -than -significant impact to landfill capacity. Based on the solid waste generation rates presented in General Plan EIR Table 4.14-14 for multi -family residential uses (MFR), and as shown previously in Table 5-8, the 23 townhomes proposed on the site would result in the long-term generation of approximately 147.4 pounds per day of solid waste. With removal of the site's existing church, church reading room, and commercial office building, the Project represents a minimum reduction of 298.0 pounds of solid waste per day. Therefore, with implementation of the proposed Project, the total amount of solid waste generated within the City of Newport Beach and deposited at the Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary Landfill would decrease, potentially extending the life of the landfill and not adversely affecting its permitted capacity of 11,500 tons per day. g) Would the Project comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulation related to solid waste? Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The Project would comply with all applicable statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Impacts would be less than significant and mitigation is not required. Public Resources Code § 40000 et seq. requires that local jurisdictions divert at least 50 percent of all solid waste generated. The proposed Project would be subject to the City's Recycling Service Fee pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 2.30, which is intended to assist the City in meeting the 50 percent diversion objective. Commercial waste haulers within the City are subject to Municipal Code Section 12.63.120 (Recycling Requirement), which states, "No person providing commercial solid waste handling services or conducting a solid waste enterprise shall deposit fifty (50) percent or more of the solid waste collected by the person in the City at any landfill." Furthermore, the proposed Project would be required to comply with Municipal Code Section 20.30.120 (Solid Waste and Recyclable Materials Storage), which mandates that all multi -unit projects with five or more dwelling units "...provide enclosed refuse and recyclable material storage areas with solid roofs." Accordingly, the proposed Project would be fully compliant with all applicable Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste, resulting in a less -than -significant impact. 5.4.17.3 Mitigation Measures Implementation of the proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts to utilities and service systems; accordingly, mitigation measures are not required. 5.4.18 Mandatory Findings of Significance Would the Project Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact a) Does the project have the potential to ❑ R1 ❑ ❑ degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major period of California Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-116 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are ❑ ❑ Q ❑ individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ('Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) C) Does the project have environmental ❑ p ❑ ❑ effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 5.4.18.1 Mandatory Findings of Significance: Project Impacts a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major period of California history or prehistory? Finding: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed Project has no potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, or reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. Mitigation Measures MM CR -1 and MM CR -2 have been imposed on the Project to ensure that the Project results in less -than -significant impacts to archaeological or paleontological resources that may be uncovered during construction of the Project. Accordingly, impacts would be less than significant, and additional mitigation measures are not required. As indicated in the analysis presented throughout this MND document, and assuming the incorporation of mitigation measures, the Project would result in no impact or less -than -significant impacts to the environment. Accordingly, the Project would not substantially degrade the quality of the environment. As indicated under the discussion and analysis of Biological Resources in Section 5.4.4, improvements proposed as part of the Project would occur wholly within the 1.2 -acre Project site, along the site's frontage with surrounding streets, and within a portion of Via Lido (an improved roadway). None of the areas planned for physical impact or development by the Project contain fish or wildlife habitat, sensitive plant or animal communities, or wetlands. The Project would have no impact on fish or wildlife population levels and would not restrict the range of any rare or endangered plant or animal. Accordingly, there would be no impact to biological resources resulting from Project implementation. As indicated in the discussion and analysis of Cultural Resources in Section 5.4.5, none of the existing buildings on the Project are included on the National Register of Historic Places or on the California Register of Historical Resources, nor are they eligible for listing; accordingly, there would be no impact to historical resources resulting from Project implementation. Although the Project site is not identified as being sensitive with respect to archaeological or paleontological resources, Mitigation Measures MM CR -I and MM CR -2 have been imposed on the Project to ensure the proper treatment of any resources that may be uncovered during construction of the proposed Project. With implementation of the Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-117 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, required mitigation, the Project would have a less -than -significant impact on historic and prehistoric resources. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects) Finding: Less -than -Significant Impact. The proposed Project would not result in impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. Cumulative impacts of the proposed Project would therefore be less than significant, and mitigation measures are not required. In order to evaluate the Project's potential to result in cumulatively significant impacts, the City of Newport Beach Planning Division compiled a list of other closely related past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects. The list of cumulative projects, along with a description of the proposed land uses, location of the projects, a description of the status of each project, and a list of discretionary actions associated with each, is provided in Technical Appendix F. A total of 31 past, present, and reasonably foreseeable projects were identified within the City. A discussion and analysis of the Projects potential to result in cumulatively considerable effects to the various issue areas identified in this MND is provided below. Aesthetics Based on the list of projects included in Technical Appendix F, only one cumulative development project (Old City Hall Complex Redevelopment) is located within the Project's viewshed. The Old City Hall Complex Redevelopment project ("City Hall Redevelopment") is located immediately west of the Project site at 3300 Newport Boulevard, and would involve the construction of mixed uses at a maximum height of 55 feet (with 65 feet for architectural projections). According to the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration for the City Hall Redevelopment, the City Hall Redevelopment would result in a significant, but mitigable, impacts to scenic vistas (due to a potential conflict in surrounding neighborhood character), visual character and quality (due to the planned change in the site's existing visual character), and light and glare (due to lighting and building materials). (Newport Beach, 2012C) As indicated in the discussion of the Project's potential impacts to Aesthetics in Section 5.4.1, the Project would result in less -than -significant impacts to scenic vistas. The Project's primary potential for resulting in impacts to scenic vistas occurs at the Lido Island Bridge approaches, which are identified as key vantage points in the City by the City's General Plan. However, as indicated on Figure 5-5, the former City Hall complex is not visible from the Lido Island Bridge approaches, nor would future buildings on the former City Hall site be visible upon buildout of the Project and the City Hall Redevelopment. Accordingly, cumulative impacts to scenic resources would be less than significant. The Project site is not visible from any state scenic highways; therefore, there is no potential for the Project to result in cumulatively significant impacts to scenic resources visible from a state scenic highway. Both the Project and the City Hall Redevelopment project would be required to comply with the design requirements of the Lido Village Design Guidelines, which would ensure that cumulative impacts due to a substantial degradation in the existing visual character of the area remain below a level of significance. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-118 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Additionally, the Project and the City Hall Redevelopment project would be required to adhere to the light and glare requirements specified in Section 20.30.070 (Outdoor Lighting) of the City's Zoning Code and the Lido Village Design Guidelines, thereby ensuring that cumulative light and glare impacts remain below a level of significance. Aericulture and Forestry Resources As indicated in the discussion and analysis of Agriculture and Forestry Resources in Section 5.4.2, the Project would have no impact on agricultural or forestry resources; accordingly, the Project has no potential to contribute to cumulatively significant impacts. Air Quality As indicated under the discussion and analysis of Air Quality in Section 5.4.3, and assuming incorporation of Mitigation Measures MM AQ -1 and MM AQ -2, the Project would be fully consistent with the SCAQMD 2012 AQMP, would not result in near- or long-term emissions that violate the SCAQMD Regional Thresholds or Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs), would not subject sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, and would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. In the long-term, implementation of the Project would reduce emissions of air pollutants associated with the Project site as compared to the land uses that occur on the site under existing conditions, thereby precluding the Project from contributing to cumulative long-term impacts associated with consistency with the 2012 AQMP. The only potential for the Project to cumulatively contribute to air quality concerns is during its short- term construction period, in regard to LSTs. The Project's short-term construction related impacts associated with PM10 and PM2.5 would be mitigated to below a level of significance and other cumulative development projects in the City subject to CEQA are required to similarly identify their potential air quality impacts and identify mitigation measures (if necessary) to reduce their impact to the extent feasible, LSTs are based on the ambient concentrations of that pollutant within the project Source Receptor Area (SRA) and the distance to the nearest sensitive receptor. Since the Project would comply with the LSTs, and because other nearby construction projects (if proposed concurrent with Project construction activities) also would be required to demonstrate compliance with the LSTs, a significant cumulative construction -related LST impact would not occur. The Project also comprises a multi -family development that is not associated with the generation of objectionable odors, and cumulatively significant impacts would therefore not occur. Biological Resources As indicated in the discussion and analysis of Biological Resources in Section 5.4.4, the Project would have no impact on biological resources. Accordingly, the Project would have no potential to contribute to a cumulatively significant impact to biological resources. Cultural Resources As indicated under the discussion and analysis of Cultural Resources in Section 5.4.5, the Project would have no impact to historical resources. Accordingly, the Project would have no potential to contribute to a cumulatively significant impact to historical resources. During Project construction, there is a remote possibility of uncovering archaeological or paleontological resources. Mitigation Measure MM CR -I and MM CR -2 have been identified to reduce potential impacts to archaeological or paleontological resources to a level below significant. Other Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-119 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal developments within the City subject to CEQA and that have the potential for uncovering subsurface resources would similarly be required to incorporate measures to address the potential for uncovering such resources during ground disturbing activities. Accordingly, and assuming incorporation of the Project -specific mitigation, potential cumulative impacts to archaeological and paleontological resources would be reduced to less -than -significant levels. The Project and all cumulative developments would be required to comply with the provisions of California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b), which would preclude cumulatively significant impacts to human remains. Geology and Soils Due to the site-specific nature of potential impacts associated with geology and soils, there is no potential for the Project to contribute to cumulatively significant impacts associated with the site's geology and soil conditions. All development in the City is required to comply with the California Building Standards Code and follow the recommendations of project -specific geotechnical reports, adherence to which preclude cumulatively significant impacts. Greenhouse Gas Emissions As indicated in the discussion and analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Section 5.4.7, the Project would result in a net reduction of greenhouse gasses emitted from the site as compared to existing conditions, and the Project would not conflict with any plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Accordingly, the Project has no potential to contribute to a cumulatively significant impact due to greenhouse gas emissions. Hazards and Hazardous Materials The Project site does not contain any recognized environmental conditions under existing conditions, and therefore has no potential for cumulatively significant impacts to people or the environment associated with such conditions. Although construction of the proposed Project has the potential to expose nearby sensitive receptors and construction workers to hazards associated with asbestos - containing materials and lead-based paints, Mitigation Measures MM HM -1 and MM HM -2 have been identified to reduce these potential impacts to a level below significance. Other cumulative developments that contain asbestos -containing materials and/or lead-based paints would similarly be required to dispose of such materials in accordance with applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulations. There are no other components of the proposed Project with a potential to create significant public health hazards; accordingly, the Project's potential contribution toward cumulative impacts associated with asbestos and lead based paint abatement would be less than cumulatively considerable following the incorporation of mitigation. The Project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school, and the Project site is not included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5; accordingly, the Project has no potential to contribute to cumulatively significant impacts associated with these thresholds. The Project would replace older buildings on the Project site with new construction, which would reduce the cumulative fire risk associated with the concentration of older structures on the Balboa Peninsula that were not built to current fire codes. Similarly, other cumulative projects that replace older buildings with new construction would also assist in lowering cumulative fire risk. As such, the Project has no potential to contribute to cumulatively significant fire risk associated with a potential Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-120 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, aircraft accident that poses fire risk on the Balboa Peninsula. Furthermore, the City's Emergency Management Plan incorporates an emergency evacuation plan that addresses cumulative effects associated with public airport operations to a level below significant. The Project site would have no impacts due to private airport -related hazards or interference with any emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans; accordingly, the Project has no potential to contribute to cumulatively significant impacts associated with private airports or emergency evacuation plans. Although the Project and other cumulative developments located on the Balboa Peninsula could be exposed to fire hazards due to the generally older buildings that predominate the area (and their lack of fire resistant construction), the Project and all cumulative development projects would be constructed in accordance with modern building codes, including fire protection measures that would attenuate the risk of fire hazards. As such, the Project and cumulative projects on the Balboa Peninsula would result in an incrementally reduced risk of fire hazards; accordingly, the Project would result in a less -than - significant cumulative impact due to fire hazards. Hydrology and Water Ouality The proposed Project would have no impacts to groundwater supplies, groundwater recharge areas, flood hazards, or flooding associated with the failure of a levee or dam; accordingly, the Project has no potential to contribute to cumulatively significant impacts associated with these issues. Similar to the proposed Project, all cumulative developments in the City would be required to prepare and implement site-specific SWPPPs and WQMPs, which would ensure that any cumulatively considerable impacts to water quality are reduced to less -than -significant levels. Additionally, and as with the proposed Project, all cumulative developments would be required to prepare hydrology studies to demonstrate that any changes to runoff does not result in on- or off-site flooding; accordingly, any cumulative impacts associated with drainage would be less than significant. The Project site would not be subject to inundation by seiches or mudflow. Although the Project site and other areas of the Balboa Peninsula are located within the City's tsunami inundation zone, the likelihood of a catastrophic -level tsunami impacting the City is considered remote. Additionally, the City has prepared an Emergency Management Plan, which identifies tsunami evacuation routes, tsunami evacuation sites, and response plans, and utilizes an outdoor emergency siren system to provide residents with advance warnings of potential tsunami emergencies. The proposed Project and cumulative development projects have no potential to adversely affect the implementation of the City's Emergency Management Plan, which would ensure that cumulatively considerable impacts due to tsunamis are reduced to less -than -significant levels. Land Use and Planninc The Project would have no impacts due to the physical division of an established community or a conflict with an applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan; accordingly, the Project has no potential to contribute to a cumulatively significant impact associated with these issues. As indicated in the analysis presented under Land Use and Planning in Section 5.4.10, the Project would be consistent with, or otherwise would not conflict with, any applicable land use plan, policies, or regulation of any agency that was adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Other cumulative development projects similarly have been shown to be consistent with all Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-121 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, applicable plans, policies, and regulations, or would be required to demonstrate such consistency prior to approval. Accordingly, cumulatively significant impacts would be less than significant. Mineral Resources As indicated under the discussion and analysis of Mineral Resources in Section 5.4.1 I, the Project would not result in any impacts to mineral resources. Accordingly, the Project has no potential to contribute to a cumulatively significant mineral resource impact. a'R= During construction of the proposed Project, there is a potential for exposing nearby sensitive receptors to loud noise levels. Project construction activities have the potential to occur simultaneous with off-site nearby construction activities (such as the City Hall Redevelopment project) which would further increase the construction -related noise level. Construction noise is exempt from Municipal Code Section 10.26 (Community Noise Control), provided such activities adhere to the timing restrictions specified in Section 10.28 (Loud and Unreasonable Noise). As with the proposed Project, construction activities associated with cumulative developments would be required to comply with the timing restrictions of Section 10.28, thereby ensuring that cumulatively significant impacts do not occur. The Project consists of a residential development that has no potential for resulting in the creation of substantial noise levels under long-term operational conditions. Moreover, the Project would result in a net decrease in vehicular traffic from the site as compared to existing conditions, which would thereby result in reduced off-site noise impacts due to traffic. Accordingly, under long-term operating conditions, the Project's contribution of noise to the cumulative noise environment would not be cumulatively considerable. There would be no cumulatively significant impacts due to airport -related noise, as the Project site is not exposed to substantial airport -related noise and would have no effect on the level of exposure of other off-site properties. Population and Housing As indicated in the discussion and analysis of impacts to Population and Housing in Section 5.4.13, the Project would have no impacts due to the displacement of substantial numbers of existing housing or people; accordingly, the Project has no potential to contribute to cumulatively significant impacts associated with housing displacement. The Project would result in the construction and operation of 23 new townhome units on-site, which would result in a projected population increase of approximately 50 persons (USC13, 2013). As indicated in the list of cumulative development projects provided in Technical Appendix F, a number of other cumulative development projects also could result in the construction of new housing units and/or new or expanded housing units within the City, which, collectively, could result in a substantial increase in the City's population. However, as indicated in the analysis provided throughout this section, and assuming implementation of the mitigation measures identified herein to address the Project's direct impacts to the environment, the Project would not result in any cumulatively significant impacts, including cumulatively significant impacts that would result from the Project's projected population increase. Accordingly, the approximately 50 new residents that would be generated by the Project would not be cumulatively considerable in relation to associated environmental effects. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-122 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal Public Services As indicated in the discussion and analysis of Project impacts to Public Services in Section 5.4.14, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in an increase in demand for fire protection or police protection services; accordingly, the Project has no potential to contribute to cumulatively significant impacts to fire and police protection services. Although the Project would result in approximately five new elementary school students, three middle school students, and three high school students, the Project applicant would be required to contribute school fees in accordance with Public Education Code § 17072.10-18. Other cumulative development projects proposing residential development would similarly be required to contribute school fees. Furthermore, the NMUSD determined that its existing student capacity is adequate to serve the projected student population, and the District had no plans for expansion of its school facilities to accommodate projected population growth. Accordingly, cumulatively significant impacts to schools would be less than significant and the Project's contribution would be less than cumulatively considerable. The Project's projected increase in the City's population by approximately 50 residents, when considered in the context of population increases that would result from buildout of other cumulative developments, would result in an increased demand for library services. The General Plan Arts and Cultural Element does not establish any numeric standard for determining the amount of physical library space needed to serve the City's population. Additionally, given changes in technology (i.e., the use of electronic media in lieu of hard copy media) and the ability to adjust service hours and programming based on demand in existing facilities, the demand for physical library space based on population -based projections is speculative. Moreover, the Newport Beach Public Library system was rated the highest ranking of California public libraries in its population category according to Hennen's American Public Library Rankings (HAPLR). The HAPLR Index focuses on 15 key factors, including funding levels, collections, staffing, hours open, number of visitors and reference services. (Newport Beach, 2013f) The high quality of the City's existing library facilities indicates that the City's library facilities are more than adequate to serve the City's population under existing conditions. Furthermore, the NBPL currently has no plans for construction or expansion of library space. The Newport Beach Central library underwent a recent expansion to service the City's population. As such, growth of the City's population associated with the Project's 50 residents and other cumulative projects would not create the need to construct a new future library or physically expand an existing library facility. Library services receive funding from property tax, a portion of which from the Project's tax assessment would be dedicated to the City's Library Fund (Newport Beach, 2012a, § 3.08.020). Recreation Based on the analysis of Project impacts presented in Section 5.4.15, there are adequate existing and planned recreational facilities within the City's Service Area I to meet the recreational demands that would be caused by the projected increase in the City's population. Although there is a possibility that planned recreational facilities may not be operational prior to occupancy of the Project, the Project would only generate an additional 50 residents whose use of existing facilities is unlikely to result in the physical deterioration of any existing recreational facilities within the City's Service Area 1. When combined with other cumulative projects within Service Area I (e.g., redevelopment of the former City Hall site), cumulative impacts on existing recreational facilities would be less than significant, as the majority of recreational opportunities within Service Area I consist of passive recreational facilities and beaches, which are not likely to suffer from physical deterioration as a result of cumulative population increases. In addition, residential development would be required to pay the requisite Quimby Act fees, which would be used by the City to provide new parks and/or recreation facilities. Specifically, the Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-123 ative Declaration 5.0 Environmental Checklist and Environmental Anal, Project would be required to contribute $26,125 per unit to the City's park funds, as required by City Council Resolution No. 2007-30, which would enable the City to provide for new or improved park facilities within the City to serve City residents and future residents of the Project. Accordingly, the Project would result in a less than cumulatively considerable impact to recreational resources. Transportation/Traffic As indicated in the discussion and analysis of Transportation/Traffic in Section 5.4.16, the Project would not result in any impacts due to traffic and would reduce the amount of traffic generated by the site under existing conditions. Moreover, redevelopment of the City Hall Site is projected to reduce peak hour traffic; thus, given the net reduction in peak hour trips associated with the Project and the City Hall Site Reuse project, traffic in the immediate vicinity of the Project would be reduced as compared to existing conditions (Newport Beach, 2012C). Accordingly, the Project has no potential to contribute to cumulatively significant impacts associated with transportation/traffic. Utilities and Service Systems As indicated under the discussion and analysis of Utilities and Service Systems in Section 5.4.17, the proposed Project would result in a net decrease in the amount of wastewater and solid waste generated by the site, and also would result in a reduction in the site's demand for water resources. Accordingly, the Project's impacts associated with wastewater, solid waste, and water supply would be less than cumulatively considerable. The Project does not propose or require the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or the expansion of existing drainage facilities. As such the Project has no potential to contribute to cumulative impacts associated with the construction of storm water drainage facilities. c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Finding: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Assuming implementation of Mitigation Measures MM AQ -1, MM AQ -2, HM -I, and MM HM -2, the Project would not have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Impacts would be less -than -significant following the incorporation of mitigation measures, and additional mitigation measures are not required. As indicated under the discussion and analysis of Air Quality in Section 5.4.3, Project -related construction activities have the potential to expose nearby sensitive concentrations during construction (i.e., PMio and PM2.5 localized emissions). Mitigation Measures MM receptors to substantial pollutant AQ -I and MM AQ -2 have been imposed on the Project to ensure the incorporation of BMPs during Project construction, which would reduce the Project's near-term air quality impacts to a level below significance. As indicated under the discussion and analysis of Hazardous Materials in Section 5.4.8, demolition activities associated with the proposed Project have the potential to expose construction workers and nearby sensitive receptors to impacts associated with asbestos -containing materials and/or lead-based paint. Mitigation Measures MM HM -I and MM HM -2 have been imposed on the Project to ensure that these impacts are reduced to less -than -significant levels. As indicated in the remaining sections of this MND document, the Project would have no impact or less -than -significant impacts on human beings, both directly and indirectly. Accordingly, and with the incorporation of mitigation, impacts would be less than significant. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 5-124 ON ■ F] Mitigated Negative Declaration 6.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 6.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program RESPONSIBLE PARTY I IMPLEMENTATION LEVEL OF THRESHOLD MITIGATION MEASURES MONITORING PARTY STAGE SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION Air Quality Threshold 4: During MM AQ -1 Prior to grading permit issuance, the City Project Applicant, Prior to grading Less than Significant construction of the proposed shall verify that the following notes are Construction Contractor permit issuance, Project, maximum daily included on the grading plan. Project / City of Newport Beach prior to combined emissions for, PM,, contractors shall be required to ensure Building Division commencement of and PM,., emissions have the compliance with the notes and permit construction and potential to exceed the LSTs periodic inspection of the construction during construction before application of best site by City of Newport Beach staff to management practices and confirm compliance. These notes also mitigation measures. shall be specified in bid documents issued to perspective construction contractors. The following notes shall be included on the grading plan and in construction bid documents to implement SCAQMD Rule 403: • The construction contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project site are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three (3) times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. • The construction contractor shall ensure that all construction vehicles hauling earth materials or demolition debris use covers on any material to prevent the emission of dust during material transport. • Disturbed areas shall be replanted as Lido Villas Residential Development Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach July 12, 2013 Page 6-1 No ■❑ Mitigated Negative Declaration 6.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program THRESHOLD MITIGATION MEASURES RESPONSIBLE PARTY I MONITORING PARTY iMPLEMENTATION STAGE LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION soon as practical following grading, if such areas will not immediately be paved or covered with buildings. • The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on all unpaved surfaces of the Project site are reduced to IS miles per hour or less. MM AQ -2 Prior to grading permit issuance, the City Project Applicant, Prior to grading shall verify that a note is included on the Construction Contractor permit issuance, grading plan requiring a sign be posted / City of Newport Beach prior to on-site that restricts the idling of diesel Building Division commencement of engines to less than five minutes. The construction and sign shall be installed before construction during construction activities commence and remain in place during the duration of construction activities. Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with idling restriction and permit periodic inspection of the construction site by City of Newport Beach staff to confirm compliance. The idling restriction also shall be specified in bid documents issued to prospective construction contractors. Cultural Resources Threshold 2: Although unlikely, MM CR -I Prior to the issuance of grading permits, Project Applicant, Prior to issuance of Less than Significant there is a remote possibility that the City shall verify that the following Construction Contractor grading permits and archaeological resources could note is included on the grading plan(s). and (if required) Project during grading be encountered during site Archaeologist / City of grading activities. "if suspected archaeological resources are Newport Beach Building encountered during ground -disturbing Division and Planning construction activities, the construction Division contractor shall temporarily halt work in a 100 -foot radius around the find until a qualified archaeologist can be called to the site to assess the significance of the find, Lido Villas Residential Development Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach July 12, 2013 Page 6-2 No ■❑ Mitigated Negative Declaration 6.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program THRESHOLD MITIGATION MEASURES RESPONSIBLE PARTY I MONITORING PARTY iMPLEMENTATION STAGE LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION and, if necessary, develop appropriate treatment measures in consultation with the City of Newport Beach." The grading contractor shall be responsible for complying with the note. If the archaeologist determines that the find does not meet the CEQA standards of cultural significance, construction shall be permitted to proceed. However, if the archaeologist determines that further information is needed to evaluate significance, the City of Newport Beach shall be notified and a data recovery plan shall be prepared in consultation with the City, which may include the implementation of a Phase II and/or III archaeological investigation per City guidelines. All significant cultural resources recovered shall be documented on California Department of Parks and Recreation Site Forms to be filed with the California Historical Resources Information System South Central Coastal Information Center (CHRIS-SCCIC). The archaeologist shall incorporate analysis and interpretation of any significant find(s) into a final Phase IV report that identifies the level of significance pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21083.2(G). The Project Applicant, in consultation with the archaeologist and the City, shall designate repositories in the event that resources are recovered. Threshold 3: Although unlikely, MM CR -2 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, Project Applicant, Prior to issuance of Less than Significant Lido Villas Residential Development Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach July 12, 2013 Page 6-3 ON ■❑ Mitigated Negative Declaration 6.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program THRESHOLD MITIGATION MEASURES RESPONSIBLE PARTY I MONITORING PARTY iMPLEMENTATION STAGE LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION there is a remote possibility that the City shall verify that the following Construction grading permits and paleontological resources could note is included on the grading plan(s). Contractor, and (if during grading be encountered during site required) Project grading activities. "If suspected paleontological resources Archaeologist / City of (fossils) are encountered during ground Newport Beach Building disturbing construction activities, the Division and Planning construction contractor shall temporarily Division halt ground -disturbing activities within 100 feet of the find until a qualified paleontologist can be coiled to the site to assess the significance of the find, and, if necessary, develop appropriate treatment measures in consultation with the City of Newport Beach." The grading contractor shall be responsible for complying with the note. At the paleontologist's discretion, the construction contractor may assist in removing rock samples for initial processing. If the paleontologist determines that the find is not unique, construction shall be permitted to proceed. However, if the paleontologist determines that further information is needed to evaluate significance, the City of Newport Beach shall be notified and a treatment plan shall be prepared and implemented in consultation with the City to protect the identified paleontological resource(s) from damage and destruction. Hazards/Hazardous Materials Threshold I and 2: The existingMM HM -I The City of Newport Beach shall Project Applicant, Prior to issuance of Less than Significant buildings on the site that would condition all demolition permits to Construction demolition permits be demolished as part of the comply with South Coast Air Quality Contractor, Asbestos- and during Lido Villas Residential Development Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach July 12, 2013 Page 6-4 ON ■❑ Mitigated Negative Declaration 6.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program THRESHOLD MITIGATION MEASURES RESPONSIBLE PARTY I MONITORING PARTY iMPLEMENTATION STAGE LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION Project contain friable asbestos Management District (SCAQMD) Rule abatement Contractor / demolition materials and materials coated 1403 with respect to asbestos containing City of Newport Beach with lead-based paint, both of materials and the demolition contractor Building Division which have the potential to shall be required to comply with Rule expose construction workers 403. All asbestos-related work and/or nearby sensitive conducted during the demolition process receptors to health risks during shall be performed by a licensed demolition activities. Asbestos- Asbestos -abatement Contractor under containing materials and the supervision of a certified Asbestos materials containing lead-based Consultant. Asbestos -containing paints have the potential to construction materials (ACCMs) shall be create a significant hazard to the removed and disposed of in compliance public or the environment. with notification and asbestos -removal procedures outlined in SCAQMD Rule 1403 to reduce asbestos-related health risks. During demolition, the demolition contractor shall maintain all records of compliance with Rule 1403, including, but not limited to, the following: evidence of notification of SCAQMD pursuant to Rule 1403; contact information for the Asbestos -abatement Contractor and Asbestos Consultant; and receipts (or other evidence) of off-site disposal of all ACCMs. These records shall be made available for City inspection upon request. MM HM -2 The City of Newport Beach shall Project Applicant, Prior to issuance of condition all demolition permits to Construction demolition permits comply with Title 17, California Code of Contractor, and and during Regulations (CCR), Division 1, Chapter 8 Certified Lead demolition (LBP Regulations), which addresses Supervisor / City of requirements for the removal of Newport Beach Building components painted with lead-based Division paint (LBP) during demolition of existing Lido Villas Residential Development Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach July 12, 2013 Page 6-5 No ■❑ Mitigated Negative Declaration 6.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program THRESHOLD MITIGATION MEASURES RESPONSIBLE PARTY I MONITORING PARTY IMPLEMENTATION STAGE LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION structures. The demolition contractor shall be required to comply with these provisions. Notification to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) shall be conducted through completion of an Abatement of Lead Hazards Notification, CDPH Form 8551. The removal of all LBP materials shall be conducted: • By a Certified Lead Supervisor or Certified Lead Works, as defined by §§ 35008 and 35009 of the LBP Regulations, respectively; • In accordance with the procedures specified in Chapter 12: Abatement, "Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead -Based Paint Hazards in Housing," U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, June 1995; • Using containment and in a manner which does not result in contamination of non -work areas with lead -contaminated dust, lead - contaminated soil, or lead-based paint debris; and • In accordance with an abatement plan prepared by a certified lead supervisor, certified lead project monitor, or certified lead project designer, which includes all of the requirements as specified in § 36100(4)(A) of the LBP Regulations The Certified Lead Supervisor Lido Villas Residential Development Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach July 12, 2013 Page 6-6 No ■❑ Mitigated Negative Declaration 6.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program THRESHOLD MITIGATION MEASURES RESPONSIBLE PARTY I MONITORING PARTY iMPLEMENTATION STAGE LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION conducting abatement shall retain records of the notification to the CDPH, and shall retain a copy of the abatement plan on-site at all times during demolition activities. The notification and abatement plan shall be made available to the City upon request for review. All demolition activities shall be subject to inspection by the CDPH and/or City officials to ensure compliance with the requirements of the LBP Regulations and abatement plan. Following completion of all abatement activities, a clearance inspection shall be conducted by a certified lead inspector/assessor or certified lead project monitor in accordance with §§ 36000(a) and 36000(c)(3) of Title 17, CCR, Division I, Chapter 8. A copy of the results of the clearance inspection shall be provided to the City Planning Division upon completion of abatement and inspection activities. Lido Villas Residential Development Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach July 12, 2013 Page 6-7 ON ■ F] Mitigated Negative Declaration 7.0 References 7.0 References Cited As Reference C&V Consulting, 2013a C&V Consulting, 2013. Hydrology Report, 3303 & 3355 Via Lido, Newport Beach, CA. March 5, 2013. (Technical Appendix C). C&V Consulting, 2013b C&V Consulting, 2013. Water Quality Management Plan (Preliminary WQMP), 3303 & 3355 Via Lido. February 2013. (Technical Appendix D). C&V Consulting, 2013c C&V Consulting, 2013. Preliminary Sewer Analysis, Tentative Tract 17555, 3355 & 3303 Via Lido. June 2013. (Technical Appendix G) CDC, 2010 California Department of Conservation, 2010. Orange County Important Farmland 2010. 2010. Available on-line at: ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dl rp/FMM P/pdf/2010/ora 10.pd CDC, 2012 California Department of Conservation, 2012. State of California Williamson Act Contract Land. 2012. Available on-line at: ftp://ftr).consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/WA/2012%20Statewide%20Map/WA 2012 8xl Ll CDE, 2013 California Department of Education, 2013. DotoQuest (web site). Accessed May 17, 2013. Available on-line at: httR://dq.cde.ca.aov/daM uest/ EPA, 2013 Environmental Protection Agency, 2013. Overview of Greenhouse Gases (web site). Accessed May 16, 2013. Available on-line at: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/j!ases.htmi Google Earth, 2011 Google Earth, 2011. Map of Newport Beach: 33°37'00.66" N and 117° 5539.83W. March 7, 2011. Newport Beach, 2006a Newport Beach, 2006. City of Newport Beach General Plan. July 25, 2006. Available on- line at: http://www.newportbeachca.gov/index.aspx?page=173 Newport Beach, 2006b Newport Beach, 2006. City of Newport Beach Draft Environmental Impact Report, General Plan 2006 Update (SCH No. 2006011119). July 25, 2006. Available on-line at: http://www.newportbeachca.gov/index.aspx?page=196 Newport Beach, 2009 Newport Beach, 2009. City of Newport Beach Local Coastal Program Coastal Land Use Plan. July 14, 2009. Available on-line at: http://www.newportbeachca.govlindex.aspx?page=1317 Newport Beach, 2010a Newport Beach, 2010. Newport Beach Zoning Map. November 25, 2010. Available on-line at: http://www6.city.newport-beach.ca.us/website/gis/pdf maps/Zoning_36X48.pdf Newport Beach, 2010b Newport Beach, 2010. Tsunami Run Up Area (Map). April 2010. Available on-line at: http://www6.city.newport- beach.ca.us/website/zis/pdf maps/CityLocationsTsunamiRunupB IIX17.pdf Newport Beach, 2011 a Newport Beach, 2011. 2010 Urban Water Management Plan. May 201 1. Available on- line at: http://www.newportbeachca.gov/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid= 10 182 Newport Beach, 2011 b Newport Beach, 2011. Udo Village Design Guidelines. December 2011. Available on- line at http://www.newportbeachca.gov/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid= 11682 Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 7-1 No O❑ Mitigated Negative Declaration 7.0 References Cited As Reference Newport Beach, 201 Ic Newport Beach, 2011. City of Newport Beach Emergency Management Plan. 2011. Available on-line at: http://www.newportbeachca.goy/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid= l 1 179 Newport Beach. 201 I d Newport Beach, 2011. Newport Banning Ranch Master Development Plan. August 2011 Newport Beach, 2013e Newport Beach, 2013. Newport Beach Public Library, 1013 Central Library Expansion. n.d. Available on-line at: http://www.newportbeach I ibrary.org/sites/review.nbpl.orgifiles/Expansion Facts2013 1. pdf Newport Beach, 2013f Newport Beach, 2013. City News: Newport Beach Public Library Receives Top Ranking. n.d. Available on-line at: http://n ewportbeac hca.gov/i nd ex.as px?paee=99&record i d=646 Newport Beach TDSD, Newport Beach Transportation and Development Services Division, 2013. Trip 2013 Generation Rates and Net Change in Traffic for DART Lido Villas - 3355 & 3303 Via Lido. May I, 2013. (Technical Appendix F). OCALUC, 2008 Orange County Airport Land Use Commission, 2008. Airport Land Use Commission Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport. April 17, 2008. Available on-line at: http://www.ocair.com/commissions/aluc/docs/IWA AELUP-April-17-2008.8 OCPW, 2013 Orange County Public Works, 2013. OC Watersheds: Newport Bay Watershed (web site). Accessed May 17, 2013. Available on-line at: https://media.ocgov.com/gov/pw/watersheds/.grams/ou rws/npb/default.asp OCTA, 2011 Orange County Transportation Authority, 2011. 1011 Orange County Congestion Management Program. 2011. Available on-line at: http://www.octa.n et/Plans-an d-Programs/Congestion-M anagement- Program/Overview/ Orange County, 1996 Orange County, 1996. Natural Community Conservation Plan & Habitat Conservation Plan, County of Orange, Central & Coastal Subregion. July 17, 1996. Available on-line at: Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 7-2 Available on-line at: http://www.newportbeachca.gov/index.aspx?Raee=637 Newport Beach, 2012a Newport Beach, 2012. Newport Beach Municipal Code. March 12, 2013. Available on- line at: http://www.codepublishing.com/CA/NewportBeach/ Newport Beach, 2012b Newport Beach, 2012. Complete Cruising Guide to Newport Harbor (Second Edition). March 2012. Available on-line at: http://www.newportbeachca.gov/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=12498 Newport Beach, 2012c Newport Beach, 2012. City of Newport Beach City Hall Reuse Project Draft Initial Study/Negative Declaration. November 2012. Available on-line at: http://www.newportbeachca.eovlpin/CEOA_REVIEW/Ci %20Hall%2OComplex%20 eu se/M itigated%20Negative%2ODectaration/02-Fi nal%20D raft%201S- N D.City%20Hall%2OReuse%2OPro6ect.03-01-13.pdf Newport Beach, 2013a Newport Beach, 2013. Lido Villas Planned Community Development Plan. May 16, 2013. Available for review at the City of Newport Beach Planning Division, 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach. Newport Beach, 2013b Newport Beach, 2013. Newport Beach Fire Department (web site). Accessed May 15, 2013. Available on-line at: http://www.newportbeachca.gov/index.aspx?page=58 Newport Beach, 2013c Newport Beach, 2013. Newport Beach Police Department (web site). Accessed May 15, 2013. Available on-line at: http://wvvw.nbpd.org/ Newport Beach, 2013d Newport Beach, 2013. Sunset Ridge Park (web site). Accessed May 16, 2013. Available on-line at: http://www.newportbeachca.gov/index.aspx?page= 114 Newport Beach, 2013e Newport Beach, 2013. Newport Beach Public Library, 1013 Central Library Expansion. n.d. Available on-line at: http://www.newportbeach I ibrary.org/sites/review.nbpl.orgifiles/Expansion Facts2013 1. pdf Newport Beach, 2013f Newport Beach, 2013. City News: Newport Beach Public Library Receives Top Ranking. n.d. Available on-line at: http://n ewportbeac hca.gov/i nd ex.as px?paee=99&record i d=646 Newport Beach TDSD, Newport Beach Transportation and Development Services Division, 2013. Trip 2013 Generation Rates and Net Change in Traffic for DART Lido Villas - 3355 & 3303 Via Lido. May I, 2013. (Technical Appendix F). OCALUC, 2008 Orange County Airport Land Use Commission, 2008. Airport Land Use Commission Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport. April 17, 2008. Available on-line at: http://www.ocair.com/commissions/aluc/docs/IWA AELUP-April-17-2008.8 OCPW, 2013 Orange County Public Works, 2013. OC Watersheds: Newport Bay Watershed (web site). Accessed May 17, 2013. Available on-line at: https://media.ocgov.com/gov/pw/watersheds/.grams/ou rws/npb/default.asp OCTA, 2011 Orange County Transportation Authority, 2011. 1011 Orange County Congestion Management Program. 2011. Available on-line at: http://www.octa.n et/Plans-an d-Programs/Congestion-M anagement- Program/Overview/ Orange County, 1996 Orange County, 1996. Natural Community Conservation Plan & Habitat Conservation Plan, County of Orange, Central & Coastal Subregion. July 17, 1996. Available on-line at: Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 7-2 No O❑ Mitigated Negative Declaration 7.0 References Cited As Reference http://www.naturereserveoc.orgidocuments.htm PSI, Inc., 2012a Professional Services Industries, Inc., 2012. Geotechnical Engineering Services Report, Proposed Townhome/Condominium Development, NWC Via Lido & Via Malaga, Newport Beach, California. August 24, 2012. (Technical Appendix B). PSI, Inc., 2012b Professional Services Industries, Inc., 2012. Report of Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Commercial Building and Church, 3303 and 3355 Via Lido, Newport Beach, Orange County, CA. August 29, 2012. (Technical Appendix EI). PSI, Inc., 2012c Professional Services Industries, Inc., 2012. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey, Office Building 3355 Via Lido, Newport Beach, CA. October 8, 2012. (Technical Appendix E3). PSI, Inc., 2012d Professional Services Industries, Inc., 2012. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey, Proposed Christian Science First Church, 3303 Via Lido, Newport Beach, CA 92663. September 27, 2012. (Technical Appendix E4). SCAG, 2001 Southern California Association of Governments, 2001. Employment Density Study Summary Report. October 31, 2001. Available on-line at: http://www.mwcog.orp pa20091008 155406.pd SCAQMD, 2008a South Coast Air Quality Management District, 2008. Draft Guidance Document - Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold. October 2008. Available on-line at: htto://www.acimd.gov/ce(ia/handboo WG HG/2008/oct22mtz/GHGguidance.ldf SCAQMD, 2008b South Coast Air Quality Management District, 2008. Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology. July 2008. Available on-line at: http://www.aqmd.gov/cega/handbook/ist/Method final. pdf SCAQMD, 2013 South Coast Air Quality Management District, 2013. Asbestos Removal and Demolition (web site). Accessed May IS, 2013. Available on-line at: http://www.aqmd.gov/comply/asbestos/asbestos.htmi Shubin & Donaldson Shubin & Donaldson Architects, 2013. 3355 & 3303 Via Lido - Planned Community Architects, 2013 Development Plan. May 16, 2013. Available for review at the City of Newport Beach Planning Division, 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach. UCSB, 2013 United States Census Bureau, 2013. State & County QuickFacts, Newport Beach (city), California (web site). Accessed May 16, 2013. Available on-line at: http://au i ckfacts.cen sus.L,ov/qfd/states/06/065 1 1 82. htm I Urban Crossroads, 2013 Urban Crossroads, Inc., 2013. Via Lido Project Focused Construction Air Quality Analysis. May 21, 2013. (Technical Appendix A). USEIA, 2010 United States Energy Information Administration, 2010. Rankings: Total Energy Consumed per Capita, 2010 (web site). Accessed May 13, 2013. Available on-line at: http://www.eia.gov/state/rankings/?sid=CA#series/12 Wieland-Davco Wieland-Davco Corporation, 2013. Miscellaneous Correspondence with Corporation, 2013 Project Applicant. n.d. (Technical Appendix F). Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 7-3 ME 01-1 Mitigated Negative Declaration 8.0 Persons Contributing to IS/MND Preparation 8.0 Persons Contributing to IS/MND Preparation 8.1 Persons Contributing to Initial Study/Addendum Preparation City of Newport Beach (Lead Agencyl Makana Nova, Assistant Planner, Community Development Department Planning Division T&B Planning. Inc. (Primary CEQA Consultant and Water Supply Assessment Preparer) Tracy Zinn, AICP, Principal Jeramey Harding, AICP, Project Manager Urban Crossroads, Inc. (Air Quality Technical Consultant) Haseeb Qureshi, Senior Associate (Air Quality Technical Consultant) 8.2 Resumes for Key Personnel Resumes for the technical consultants responsible for preparing the IS/MND and the Project's construction -level air quality analysis are provided on the following pages. Lido Villas Residential Development July 12, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Page 8-1 .AI� L��J P L A N N I N G COMPANY DATA TRACY ZINN, AICP PRINCIPAL tzinn@tbplanning.com Corporate Office 17542 East 17`h Street Suite too Tustin, CA 9278o (714)505-6360 Murrysville Office 3o81 Carson Avenue Murrysville, PA15668 (724) 327-3760 I.R16101 Education Bachelor of Science in Urban and Regional Planning (Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 1992) Tracy Zinn, AICP, joined T&B Planning in 1993 and became a Principal in 2006. She manages the firm's environmental services department. Tracy is responsible for preparing and managing California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance documents and providing quality control for a majority of the company's environmental planning documents, environmental technical reports, and historic preservation plans. She also oversees the preparation of specific plans, design guidelines, zoning ordinances, and other planning documents for context -sensitive projects. SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE Environmental Compliance Documents (CEQA and Technical Reports): Tracy prepares, edits, and directs the preparation of CEQA documents and supporting technical studies. Over her career, Tracy has prepared and quality -control reviewed over loo CEQA documents. She also has directed the preparation of several hundred technical studies for a wide range of project types, including residential, commercial, industrial, mixed-use, and infrastructure -related land uses, for both public and private clients. She is respected for preparing environmental documents that are easily understood, accurate, and legally defensible. Certifications Project Management & Public Meeting Facilitation: Tracy takes a strong American Institute of leadership role in project team meetings, represents clients at public hearings and Certified Planners (AICP) workshops, and manages coordination efforts among clients and public agencies. She directs a staff of analysts, planners, and technical support personnel and is Affiliations skilled at leading large project teams. Tracy is often looked to by T&B Planning's Environ ental of staff and clients, as well as government officials, to provide overall project Environmental Professionals management and bring focus to the task at hand. American Planning Master Planning/Historic Preservation Planning/Permitting: Tracy's working Association knowledge of local and regional planning issues, design standards, zoning laws, and public policies are invaluable when applied to context -sensitive properties. She Green Building Alliance assists clients in obtaining land use permits and preparing specific plans, design Commercial Real Estate guidelines, and zoning ordinances. Tracy has also prepared several historic Women (CREW) preservation plans for small towns, cities, and State Historic Preservation Offices. By applying her combined planning and environmental compliance experience, Tracy can critique a project's feasibility comprehensively, saving her clients' time and money. Design Guides: Tracy prepares planning documents that focus on community character retention and the protection of natural and cultural assets. She has directed the preparation of several community character studies and regional and local design guides. The design guide she authored for the 12 -county Pennsylvania Wilds region was awarded an American Planning Association merit award for best practices in 2008. PLANNING • DESIGN • ENVIRONMENTAL • GRAPHICS TRACY ZINN, AICP L PRINCIPAL tzinn@tbplanning.com P L A N N I N G REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS • Audie Murphy Ranch Specific Plan EIR; Menifee, California • Citrus Heights Specific Plan EIR Addendum; Riverside County, California • Eureka Boys and Girls Club EIR Peer Review; Eureka, California • First Inland Logistics Center II EIR; Moreno Valley, California • French Valley Specific Plan EIR and EIR Addendum; Riverside County, California • Highlands Ranch EIR; San Diego County, California • Jeffries Ranch EIR; Oceanside, California • Lee Lake Water District MND; Corona, California • March Business Center EIR; Moreno Valley, California • Mira Loma Tentative Tract 33461 EIR; Riverside County, California • Neighborhood 8A EIR; San Diego, California • North Newport Center Planned Community EIR Addendum; Newport Beach, California • Nuevo Business Park EIR; Riverside County, California • Nuevo Business Park Phase II Subsequent EIR; Riverside County, California • Oleander Industrial Park EIR; Riverside County, California • Otay Mesa Community Plan Update Program EIR Peer Review; San Diego, California • Serrano Commerce Center EIR; Riverside County, California • Tentative Map 313og Focused EIR; Riverside County, California • Tentative Map 31826 Focused EIR; Riverside County, California • Tentative Map 32136 Initial Study/MND; Riverside County, California • Trailmark Specific Plan EIR; Riverside County, California • Trammel Crow Business Center EIR Addendum; Riverside County, California • Wakunaga Manufacturing Facility MND; Riverside County, California • Wickerd Road Tentative Tract 31194 EIR; Riverside County, California REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF PLANNING PROJECTS • Audie Murphy Ranch Specific Plan; Riverside County, California • City of Pittsburgh Cultural Heritage Plan; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania • City -Wide Annexation and Prioritization Study; Perris, California • Ohiopyle Borough Design Guide and Zoning Ordinance; Ohiopyle, Pennsylvania • Pennsylvania Statewide Historic Preservation Plan (2012-2017); Commonwealth of Pennsylvania • Pennsylvania Wilds Design Guide; Commonwealth of Pennsylvania • Philipsburg Borough Historic Preservation Plan; Philipsburg, Pennsylvania • Pine Creek Valley Corridor Management Study; Lycoming and Tioga Counties, Pennsylvania • Route 31 West Corridor Visioning Study and Design Guidelines; Somerset County, Pennsylvania • Serrano Commerce Center Specific Plan; Riverside County, California • Talega Specific Plan and Area Plans; San Clemente, California • Torrey Santa Fe Design Guidelines; San Diego, California PLANNING • DESIGN • ENVIRONMENTAL • GRAPHICS JERAMEY UNDING, AICD L SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER J jharding�altbplanning.com P L A N N I N G COMPANY DATA Jeramey Harding, AICP, joined T&B Planning in 2002 and provides supervision, oversight, and management of the firm's environmental services in Southern Corporate Office California. He also serves as project manager for complicated and controversial 17542 East 17th Street planning and environmental compliance projects. Jeramey is primarily focused on Suite loo ensuring project compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Tustin, CA 9278o As a Project Manager, he is responsible for managing the production and review of (714) 505-636o technical studies and leading project teams in the preparation of Environmental San Diego Office Impact Reports (EIRs). 1419 University Avenue Suite C Jeramey is a results -oriented manager with a record of successful team San Diego, CA 92103 coordination and leadership. His problem -solving skills and technical accuracy (619) 501-6041 often exceed the expectations of clients, agencies, and project applicants. PERSONAL DATA I SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE Education Project Management: Jeramey effectively and efficiently manages teams of Master of Urban and technical experts. He also represents clients at public hearings and workshops and Regional Planning manages coordination efforts among public agencies. Jeramey is skilled in (Eastern Washington reviewing technical reports for adequacy and directs teams of technical University, 2001) consultants to ensure projects are completed on-time and on -budget. Bachelor of Science in Environmental Compliance Documentation (CEQA and NEPA): Jeramey has Natural Resources Planning prepared over 50 CEQA documents, including Mitigated Negative Declarations (Humboldt State University, (MNDs), Initial Studies/Environmental Assessments (IS/EA), EIRs, MMRPs, and 1999) other environmental documents for residential, commercial, industrial, and public facility projects for both public and private clients. Not one of T&B Planning's Certifications American Institute of carefully -prepared EIRs has ever been successfully challenged in court. Certified Planners (AICP) Planning/Entitlement Documentation: In addition to environmental compliance Affiliations documentation, Jeramey is well -versed in preparing and processing American Planning planning/entitlement documentation. He has prepared Change of Zone, Specific Association Plan, Development Plan, Master Plan, Precise Plan, and General Plan Amendment applications; Specific Plans; Zoning Ordinances; and public notices, including Building Industry Notices of Preparation (NOP) and Notices of Completion (NOC). Association CA Association of Visual Quality Analysis: Jeramey is a recognized expert for preparing visual quality Environmental analyses for projects throughout Southern California. These analyses are often Professionals utilized in CEQA documents, such as EIRs, to analyze a proposed project's potential impacts to aesthetics. Reports and illustrations addresses topics such as visual Urban Land Institute quality, viewsheds, lighting, and aesthetic and community character impacts as viewed from surrounding public viewing areas. PLANNING a DESIGN a ENVIRONMENTAL o GRAPHICS JERAMEY UNDING, AICD L SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER jharding�altbplanning.com P L A N N I N G REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS • Audie Murphy Ranch EIR and Addenda; Riverside County, California • Batiquitos Bluffs EIR; City of Encinitas, California • Candlelight Villas East EIR; City of San Diego, California • Canyon Trails EIR; City of Hemet, California • EI Sobrante Landfill SEIR; Riverside County, California • Fleming Ranch EIR; City of Menifee, California • Gavilan Hills EIR; Riverside County, California • Hawano Supplemental EIR; San Diego County, California • Highlands Ranch EIR; San Diego County, California • Otay Business Park Supplemental EIR; San Diego County, California • San Lorenzo Lift Station EIR; City of Santa Ana, California • Thermal 551 EIR; Riverside County, California REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF PLANNING PROJECTS • 1o1 Ranch Specific Plan; Imperial County, California • 5`h and Pennsylvania Urban Infill Project Management; City of San Diego, California • Buena Creek Village Due Diligence; San Diego County, California • Esplanade Planned Development Permit; City of San Diego, California • Fashion Walk Planning Consulting; City of San Diego, California • Gavilan Hills Specific Plan; Riverside County, California • Hillcrest Urban Infill Project Management; City of San Diego, California • Lake Drive General Plan Amendment; City of Encinitas, California • Melrose Heights Development Plan; Oceanside, California • Qua Otay Project Management; City of San Diego, California • Robertson Ranch Master Plan; City of Carlsbad, California • Scripps Wisteria Urban Infill Project Management; City of San Diego, California LIST OF VISUAL QUALITY STUDIES • Chollas Creek Visual Quality Report; San Diego County, California • Highlands Ranch Visual Quality Report; San Diego County, California • Luther Drive Visual Quality Report; San Diego County, California • Santa Fe Chinese Church Visual Simulation Analysis; San Diego County, California • Spring Valley Vistas Visual Quality Report; San Diego County, California • Wildwood Canyon Radio Tower Visual Quality Report; San Bernardino County, California • WIS Broadcast Tower Visual Quality Report; San Diego County, California LIST OF OTHER TECHNICAL STUDIES • Agricultural Resources Report for The Grove Project; San Diego County, California • Candlelight Villas East Land Use Consistency Analysis; City of San Diego, California • The Grove Community Character Study; San Diego County, California • The Grove Growth Induction Study; San Diego County, California PLANNING a DESIGN a ENVIRONMENTAL o GRAPHICS Haseeb Qureshi, MES URBAN Senior Associate/ Senior Air Quality & 41 Corporate Park, Suite 300 Climate Change Specialist Irvine, CA 92606 ph: (949) 660.1994 Since joining Urban Crossroads in June 2004, Mr. Qureshi has worked on a Areas of Expertise variety of projects, including mobile source (cancer) health risk assessments, Air Quality Analysis/Permitting air quality impact analyses, and air quality conformity analyses for Dispersion Modeling, Health transportation improvement projects. Risk Assessment Air Quality Conformity Since 2006, Mr. Qureshi has been actively involved in responding to various Analysis for Interchange project's needs to address Global Climate Change in their CEQA Documents. Projects Mr. Qureshi co-authored an informational newsletter detailing the passage of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assembly Bill 32 (AB32) and how it will continue to impact development Evaluation/Inventory projects. Climate Action Planning Mr. Qureshi has a strong technical background in utilizing various air-quality Education models such as the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS), the California Line M.S./Environmental Science/CSUF Source Dispersion Model (CALINE-4), U.S. EPA -approved CAL3QHC, the Industrial Source Short Term (ISCST3) Model, and the AMS/EPA Regulatory Besign/ron Irvine Analysis 8 Model (AERMOD). Design/ UC Irvine Affiliations At Urban Crossroads, Inc., Mr. Qureshi has participated in hundreds of air American Planning quality analyses studies including numerous mobile source and air toxics Association (APA) health risk assessments for various residential, commercial, and industrial Association or Environmental developments in Orange, Imperial, Kern, Los Angeles, Riverside, San Professionals( AEP) Bernardino, and San Diego Counties. He is a current member of the Air& Waste Management American Planning Association (APA), Association of Environmental Association(A&WMA) Professionals (AEP), and the Air & Waste Management Association Prof. Accomplishments (A&WMA). San Diego County Approved Consultant List—Air Quality In addition, Mr. Qureshi is an active participant of the South Coast Air Quality Certification -Air Dispersion Management District, San Diego County, and Orange County Association of ModAssessment—Lakes Risk Environmental Professionals workinggroups that are collaborating to Assessment—Lakes 9 P 9 Environmental establish guidance on establishing climate change thresholds for CEQA Certi(cation-AB2588 documents. Mr. Qureshi was also an active participant in the South Coast Air Regulatory Standards—Trinity Quality Management District's working group on establishing PM2.5 Consultants significance thresholds for CEQA projects. Certificate of Completion - Principles of Ambient Air Monitoring -California Air Resources Board Certificate of Completion - Planned Communities and Urban Infill – Urban Land Institute Prof. History Urban Crossroads. Inc. Sr. Associate /Sr. Air Quality and Climate Change Specialist 2007 – Present Urban Crossroads, Inc. Air Quality and Climate Change Specialist 2004 –2006 LO►URBAN CROSSROAE)S May 21, 2013 Mr. Joel Morse T&B PLANNING 17542 East 17th Street, Suite 100 Tustin. CA 92780 41 Corporate Park I Suite 300 1 Irvine, CA 92606 (949) 660-1994 www.urban roads.com Subject: Via Lido Project Focused Construction Air Quality Analysis Dear Mr. Morse: The firm of Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to submit the following focused construction air quality analysis for the proposed Via Lido Project ("Project'). The Project site is generally located at 3303 and 3305 Via Lido in the City of Newport Beach. The purpose of this analysis is to determine the construction -related air quality impacts for Project and provide any mitigation measures that will be required to maintain potential impacts at less than significant levels. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The project applicant is proposing the demolition of an existing church and office building and approval for the development of 23 attached three-story townhome condominiums, constructed in five separate building blocks. APPLICABLE THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) allows for the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district to be used to assess impacts of a project on air quality. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) has established regional daily thresholds of significance for air quality for construction activities and project operations, as shown in Table 1. TABLE 1 SCAQMD REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS Air Pollutant Construction Operations Volatile Organic Compounds VOC 75 lbs/day 55 lbs/da Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) 100 Ibs/day 55 Ibs/da Carbon Monoxide CO 550 lbs/day 550 lbs/day Sulfur Oxides (SC)x) 150 Ibs/day 150 Ibs/da Particulates PM10 150 Ibs/day 1501bs/da Fine particulates PM2.s 55 lbs/day 55 lbs/da Source: SCAQMD, 2011. htto://acmd.gov/cega/handbook/sionthres.pdf 08561-03 AQ Letter Mr. Joel Morse T&B PLANNING May 21, 2013 Page 2 The SCAQMD developed localized significance thresholds (LSTs) for emissions of NOZ, CO, PM10, and PM2,5 generated at the project site (off-site mobile -source emissions are not included the LST analysis). LSTs represent the maximum emissions at a project site that are not expected to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent federal or state Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS). LSTs are based on the ambient concentrations of that pollutant within the project Source Receptor Area (SRA) and the distance to the nearest sensitive receptor. LST analysis for construction is applicable for all projects of five acres and less; however, it can be used as screening criteria for larger projects to determine whether or not dispersion modeling may be required. The construction LSTs for a 1.196 -acre maximum daily disturbance within SRA 18/20 for sensitive receptors located within 25 meters (approximately 82 feet)' are shown in Table 2. If emissions exceed the LSTs (after mitigation), then dispersion modeling would need to be conducted to determine whether potential impacts would occur. TABLE 2 SCAQMD LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLD — SCREENING LEVEL ANALYSIS Air Pollutant Threshold (lbs/day) Construction Carbon Monoxide CO 708.74 Nitrogen Oxides NOz 99.64 Particulates PM10 4.59 Fine Particulates PM2.5 3.39 Source: SCAQMD 2009, Mass Rate Lookup Tables: Based on LSTs for a 1.196 -acre disturbance site (using SCAQMD's linear regression approach in SRA 18120 at a distance of 25 meters (-82 feet) between the source and receptor. CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS WITHOUT MITIGATION Construction activities associated with the proposed project will result in emissions of CO, VOCs, NO., SOx, PM2.5, and PM10. Construction related emissions are expected from the following construction equipment and construction activities: • Demolition • Site Preparation • Grading • Foundation/Building Construction/Painting • Site Concrete Since site specific construction details are not known with a great deal of certainty at this stage of the development process, thus the CaIEEMoDT11 model default values were utilized where information was ' Although sensitive receptors may be located nearer than 25 meters, immediately adjacent to the Project site boundaries. The SCAQMD LST Methodology explicitly states that "It is possible that a project may have receptors closer than 25 meters. Projects with boundaries located closer than 25 meters to the nearest receptor should use the LSTs for receptors located at 25 meters." Accordingly, LSTs for receptors at 25 meters are utilized in this analysis and provide for a conservative i.e. "health protective" standard of care. 08561-03 AQ Letter Mr. Joel Morse T&B PLANNING May 21, 2013 Page 3 unknown. The following table summarized construction equipment assumptions that were modeled for analysis purposes. The following pieces of equipment were provided by the Project engineer for all construction scenarios with the exception of site preparation, which utilized CaIEEMod model details. The Project includes demolition of an existing church and office building totaling approximately 41,430 square feet or 1,905.78 tons of debris2 that will be hauled off-site. All demolition debris generated as part of the Project would be disposed of off-site. The disposal location has not been determined, but is expected to be delivered to the Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary Landfill, located at 11002 Bee Canyon Access Road in Irvine (approximately 21.7 roadway miles from the proposed Project site). According to information provided from the Project Applicant, demolition debris would be recycled where possible, but all such recycling would occur off-site; none of the site's demolition debris would be used during construction of the proposed Project (Wieland-Davco Corporation, 2013). CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ASSUMPTIONS rM d t o m y c t in n d m m d ;;U rn E E w d m U a N a2 N Y N C E c U U Operation O W t•7 J Cf) u- lC U m 0L d _ I Demolition 1 2 1 1 Site Preparation 1 1 1 Grading 1 2 Foundation/Building Construction/Painting 1 1 2 1 2 2 Site Concrete 1 1 As shown in Table 3, construction activities would not exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds for the VOC, NOx CO, SOx, PMto, and PM2.5 before application of the best management practices (BMPs). Table 5, provides a summary of regional project emissions with application of BMPs. Table 4 and Table 6 show the maximum daily construction emissions (pounds per day) generated during construction activities compared with the screening level LSTs for a maximum 1.196 -acre daily disturbance area. In accordance with SCAQMD methodology, only onsite stationary sources and mobile equipment occurring on the project site are included in the analysis. As shown in Table 5, maximum daily combined 3 Tonnage of waste material is 0.046 tons of waste material per 1 ft2 of building area. Source, CalEEMod T"' 2011 Appendix A, Page 12 and USEPA's Gap Filling PM10 Emission Factors for Selected Open Area Dust Sources (1988), Page 28. Thus, the 41,430 gross square feet of existing building space to be demolished (per the site plan) x 0.046 tons = 1,905.78 tons of debris. 08561-03 AQ Letter Mr. Joel Morse T&B PLANNING May 21, 2013 Page 4 emissions for NOx and CO from the project would not exceed the LSTs. PM10 and PM2.5 emissions have the potential to exceed the LSTs before application of the BMPs. After application of BMPs for watering, emissions are reduced to less than significant. Consequently, construction emissions generated by the project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations and impacts would be less than significant since the applicable BMPs are required for all construction Projects consistent with SCAQMD's Rule 403. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES The project will implement the following best management practices (BMPs) that will ensure that fugitive dust emissions during construction activities are reduced to less than significant levels. Table 5 (regional emissions) and Table 6 (localized emissions) provide the construction emissions summary after implementation of the following BMPs. • Adhere to best management practices which include the application of water on disturbed soils three times per day, covering haul vehicles, replanting disturbed areas as soon as practical and restricting vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph or less, to control fugitive dust. • SCAQMD Rule 403: Fugitive Dust. Requires control measures to reduce fugitive dust from active operations, storage piles, or disturbed surfaces so as to not be visible beyond the property line or exceed 20 percent opacity. TABLE 3 OVERALL CONSTRUCTION (MAXIMUM DAILY EMISSIONS) (POUNDS PER DAY) (WITHOUT BMPs) Activity VOC NO. CO SO. PM1a PM2.5 Maximum Daily Emissions 72.17 39.73 25.56 0.04 9.17 4.83 SCAQMD Re ional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant? NO NO NO NO NO NO TABLE 4 LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE SUMMARY CONSTRUCTION (WITHOUT BMPs) Activity NO. CO PM10 PM2.5 Maximum Daily Emissions 34.56 21.62 7.85 4.82 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 99.64 708.74 4.59 3.39 Significant? NO NO YES YES TABLE 5 OVERALL CONSTRUCTION (MAXIMUM DAILY EMISSIONS) (POUNDS PER DAY) (WITH BMPs) Activit VOC N% CO SO. PM10 PM2.5 Maximum Daily Emissions 72.17 39.73 25.56 0.04 7.93 2.81 SCAQMD Re ional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant? NO NO NO NO NO NO 08561-03 AQ Letter Mr. Joel Morse T&B PLANNING May 21, 2013 Page 5 TABLE 6 LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE SUMMARY CONSTRUCTION (WITH BMPS) Activity NO. CO PM10 PM2.5 Maximum Daily Emissions 34.56 21.62 3.98 2.82 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 99.64 708.74 4.59 3.39 Significant? NO NO NO NO CONCLUSION Results of the analysis indicate that the proposed projects short-term construction emissions will not exceed the established regional or localized significance thresholds. Therefore a less than significant impact is expected. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at (949) 660-1994 x217. URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. 4b�_� Haseeb Qureshi, MES Senior Associate HQ JN: 08561-03 AQ Letter Attachment 08561-03 AQ Letter Mr. Joel Morse T&B PLANNING May 21, 2013 Page 6 ATTACHMENT "A" CALEEMODTM MODELING OUTPUT 08561-03 AQ Letter CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2011.1.1 Via Lido Orange County, Summer 1.0 Proiect Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size. Metric Parking Lot 58 Space ---------- .... -------- ;.---------------------------- ;------ ---- ............. .- Condo/Townhouse 23 Dwelling Unit 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Climate Zone 8 Precipitation Freq (Days) 30 1.3 User Entered Comments Project Characteristics - Land Use - Lot acreage from Project Plans Construction Phase - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Equipment list from Project Engineer Off-road Equipment - Equipment list from Project Engineer Utility Company Southern California Edison Date: 5/21/2013 1 of 23 Off-road Equipment - Equipment list from Project Engineer Off-road Equipment - Equipment list from Project Engineer Off-road Equipment - Demolition - Grading - Total Disturbed Acres from Site Plan Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Trips and VMT - Demolition Trip Length from Project description 2.0 Emissions Summa 2 of 23 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2013 5.44 39.73 25.56 0.04 7.01 2.16 9.17 3.31 2.16 4.83 0.00 4,543.51 ' 0.00 0.49 0.00 4,553.75 ----------- ------ .__ _ ------ .__ ------ 2014 72.17 29.43 23.69 0.04 0.45 1.81 2.27 0.02 1.81 1.83 0.00 4,037.76 0.00 0.44 0.00 4,047.11 Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Mitigated Construction 3 of 23 ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Totel Bio -CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2013 5.44 39.73 25.56 0.04 5.77 2.16 7.93 1.30 2.16 2.81 0.00 4,543.51 ' 0.00 0.49 0.00 4,553.75 2014 72.17 29.43 23.69 0.04 0.45 1.81 2.27 0.02 1.81 1.83 0.00 4,037.76 ' 0.00 0.44 0.00 4,047.11 Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3 of 23 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- TotaICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category Ib/day Ib/day Area 3.62 0.14 9.57 0.02 0.00 1.23 0.00 1.23 162.30 417.46 0.65 0.01 596.41 .................... .._ _ .... ..___ .____ .._ _ .__ _ ..___ Energy0.02 0.15 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 ' 0.01' 189.94 0.00 0.00 191.10 ...........:......r..___.�_..._.�.. ___.�_... _.�.. ___.�_... _.�.. __ ..__ ----------- ------ ..._ ------ ..._ ------ Mobile 0.81 1.52 8.21 0.02 1.81 0.07 1.89 0.06 0.07 0.13 1,549.80 ' 0.06 1,551.09 Total 4.45 1.81 17.84 0.04 1.81 0.07 3.13 0.06 0.07 1.37 162.30 2,157.20 0.71 0.01 2,338.60 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail 4 of 23 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category Ib/day Ib/day Area 3.62 0.14 9.57 0.02 0.00 1.23 0.00 1.23 162.30 417.46 0.65 0.01 596.41 ...... . .... .... .... ..... .... ... . ..... ...:..... Energy 0.02 Ener 0.02 0.15 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 169.94 0.00 0.00 191.10 Mobile 0.81 1.52 8.21 0.02 1.81 0.07 1.89 0.06 0.07 0.13 ? 1,549.80 0.06 1,551.09 Total 4.45 1.81 17.84 0.04 1.81 0.07 3.13 0.06 0.07 1.37 162.30 2,157.20 0.71 0.01 2,338.60 3.0 Construction Detail 4 of 23 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area 3.2 Demolition - 2013 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.04 0.00 2.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Off -Road 4.63 34.56 21.62 0.03 1.95 1.95 1.95 1.95 ? 3,558.13 0.42 3,566.87 Total 4.63 34.56 21.62 0.03 2.04 1.95 3.99 0.00 1.95 1.95 3,558.13 Category 0.42 lb/day 3,566.87 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site 5 of 23 ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 13io-CO2 NBio- TotaICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.50 5.10 3.08 0.01 4.77 0.21 4.98 0.03 0.21 0.24 827.15 0.02 827.68 Vendor D.00 0.00 D.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r.._.__�_..___�.._._.�_...__�.. _. _.�_...__�.. ............. .... ...... ...... ...... ...... Worker 0.07 0.08 0.87 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.21 0.01 0.01 0.01 158.22 0.01 158.41 Total 0.57 5.18 3.95 0.01 4.97 0.22 5.19 0.04 0.22 0.25 985.37 0.03 986.09 5 of 23 3.2 Demolition - 2013 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r_...__�..___.�_..___�.. -------------- _- .......... _..___ _____ ...... ------ ------ Off-Road 4.63 34.56 21.62 0.03 1.95 1.95 1.95 1.95 0.00 ? 3,558.13 0.42 3,566.87 Total 4.63 34.56 21.62 0.03 0.80 1.95 2.75 0.00 1.95 1.95 0.00 3,558.13 Category 0.42 Ihlday 3,566.87 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 6 of 23 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Totel CO2 Category Ihlday Ihlday Hauling 0.50 5.10 3.08 0.01 4.77 0.21 4.98 0.03 0.21 0.24 827.15 0.02 827.68 ...........:......r-------------- .------- ........... .�_... ------ ------ ----------- -_. _---_ -__ ---_ -__ Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker 0.07 0.08 0.87 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.21 0.01 0.01 0.01 158.22 0.01 158.41 Total 0.57 5.18 3.95 0.01 4.97 0.22 5.19 0.04 0.22 0.25 985.37 0.03 986.09 6 of 23 3.3 Site Preparation - 2013 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 5.80 0.00 5.80 2.90 0.00 2.90 0.00 _ _ _____-______-__ _ ------ ...........:......r_..___�..___.�_..___�.. --------------------- Off -Road 3.96 31.66 18.62 0.03 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 ? 3,253.39 0.36 3,260.86 Total 3.96 31.66 18.62 0.03 5.80 1.60 7.40 2.90 1.60 4.50 3,253.39 Category 0.36 lb/day 3,260.86 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site 7 of 23 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Totel CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r..___.�_...__�..___.�_..._.�.. ___.�_... _.�.. ___.�_... _.�--_. ___. -_. ..._ ... - - -_ -_-_ Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r_..__.�..____�_..__.�..____�_..__.�.. ____�_..__.�.. ------------- ..__ ...__ ...... Worker 0.05 0.05 0.53 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 97.37 0.01 97.48 Total 0.05 0.05 0.53 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 97.37 0.01 97.48 7 of 23 3.3 Site Preparation - 2013 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.26 0.00 2.26 1.13 0.00 1.13 0.00 ...........:......r_..___�..___.�_..___�.._... ._...._�......�_.....}..__ _ .......... ...... Off -Road 3.96 31.66 18.62 0.03 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 0.00 ? 3,253.39 0.36 3,260.86 Total 3.96 31.66 18.62 0.03 2.26 1.60 3.86 1.13 1.60 2.73 0.00 3,253.39 Category 0.36 lb/day 3,260.86 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 8 of 23 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Totel CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r..___.�_...__�..___.�_..._.�.. ___.�_... _.�.. ___.�_... _.�--_. ___. -_. ..._ ... - - -_ -_-_ Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r_..__.�..____�_..__.�..____�_..__.�.. ____�_..__.�.. ------------- ..__ ...__ ...... Worker 0.05 0.05 0.53 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 97.37 0.01 97.48 Total 0.05 0.05 0.53 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 97.37 0.01 97.48 8 of 23 3.4 Grading - 2013 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.34 0.00 6.34 3.31 0.00 3.31 0.00 Off -Road 3.67 29.09 16.99 0.03 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 ' 2,941.28 0.33 2,948.20 Total 3.67 29.09 16.99 0.03 6.34 1.51 7.85 3.31 1.51 4.82 0.01 2,941.28 97.37 0.33 0.01 2,948.20 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site 9 of 23 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Totel CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r..___.�_...__�..___.�_..._.�.. ___.�_... _.�.. ___.�_... _.�--_. ___. -_. ..._ ... - - -_ -_-_ Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r_..__.�..____�_..__.�..____�_..__.�.. ____�_..__.�.. ------------- ..__ ...__ ...... Worker 0.05 0.05 0.53 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 97.37 0.01 97.48 Total 0.05 0.05 0.53 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 97.37 0.01 97.48 9 of 23 3.4 Grading - 2013 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.47 0.00 2.47 1.29 0.00 1.29 0.00 ...........:......r_.._._..____�_..___�..___.�_..___�.... _.�......}.... ............ _..___ .......................... OR -Road 3.67 29.09 16.99 0.03 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 0.00 ' 2,941.28 0.33 2,948.20 Total 3.67 29.09 16.99 0.03 2.47 1.51 3.98 1.29 1.51 2.80 0.00 2,941.28 97.37 0.33 0.01 2,948.20 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 10 of 23 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Totel CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r..___.�_...__�..___.�_..._.�.. ___.�_... _.�.. ___.�_... _.�--_. ___. -_. ..._ ... - - -_ -_-_ Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r_..__.�..____�_..__.�..____�_..__.�.. ____�_..__.�.. ------------- ..__ ...__ ...... Worker 0.05 0.05 0.53 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 97.37 0.01 97.48 Total 0.05 0.05 0.53 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 97.37 0.01 97.48 10 of 23 3.5 Building Construction - 2013 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road 5.21 30.67 21.86 0.04 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 3,565.22 ' 0.47 3,575.00 Total 5.21 30.67 21.86 0.04 PM2.5 1.99 1.99 CO2 1.99 1.99 3,565.22 Category 0.47 lb/day 3,575.00 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site 11 of 23 ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- TotaICG2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _--_ _ ____ ------------- --_ _ .____ ------ Vendor 0.09 0.93 0.62 0.00 0.06 0.03 0.09 0.00 0.03 0.04 161.65 0.00 161.74 Worker 0.15 0.15 1.73 0.00 0.40 0.01 0.41 0.01 0.01 0.03 316.45 0.02 316.81 Total 0.24 1.08 2.35 0.00 0.46 0.04 0.50 0.01 0.04 0.07 478.10 0.02 478.55 11 of 23 3.5 Building Construction - 2013 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road 5.21 30.67 21.86 0.04 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 0.00 3,565.22 ' 0.47 3,575.00 Total 5.21 30.67 21.86 0.04 PM2.5 1.99 1.99 CO2 1.99 1.99 0.00 3,565.22 Category 0.47 lb/day 3,575.00 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 12 of 23 ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- TotaICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _--_ _ ____ ------------- --_ _ .____ ------ Vendor 0.09 0.93 0.62 0.00 0.06 0.03 0.09 0.00 0.03 0.04 161.65 0.00 161.74 Worker 0.15 0.15 1.73 0.00 0.40 0.01 0.41 0.01 0.01 0.03 316.45 0.02 316.81 Total 0.24 1.08 2.35 0.00 0.46 0.04 0.50 0.01 0.04 0.07 478.10 0.02 478.55 12 of 23 3.5 Building Construction - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road 4.74 28.45 21.52 0.04 1.77 1.77 1.77 1.77 3,565.22 ' 0.42 3,574.14 Total 4.74 28.45 21.52 0.04 PM2.5 1.77 1.77 CO2 1.77 1.77 3,565.22 Category 0.42 lb/day 3,574.14 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site 13 of 23 ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- TotaICG2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _--_ _ ____ ------ ------ ------ .____ ------ Vendor 0.08 0.84 0.56 0.00 0.06 0.03 0.08 0.00 0.03 0.03 f 162.24 0.00 162.33 Worker 0.14 0.14 1.60 0.00 0.40 0.01 0.41 0.01 0.01 0.03 310.30 0.02 310.64 Total 0.22 0.98 2.16 0.00 0.46 0.04 0.49 0.01 0.04 0.06 472.54 0.02 472.97 13 of 23 3.5 Building Construction - 2014 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road 4.74 28.45 21.52 0.04 1.77 1.77 1.77 1.77 0.00 3,565.22 ' 0.42 3,574.14 Total 4.74 28.45 21.52 0.04 PM2.5 1.77 1.77 CO2 1.77 1.77 0.00 3,565.22 Category 0.42 lb/day 3,574.14 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 14 of 23 ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- TotaICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _--_ _ ____ ------ ------ ------ .____ ------ Vendor 0.08 0.84 0.56 0.00 0.06 0.03 0.08 0.00 0.03 0.03 f 162.24 0.00 162.33 Worker 0.14 0.14 1.60 0.00 0.40 0.01 0.41 0.01 0.01 0.03 310.30 0.02 310.64 Total 0.22 0.98 2.16 0.00 0.46 0.04 0.49 0.01 0.04 0.06 472.54 0.02 472.97 14 of 23 3.6 Paving - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road 1.00 5.85 4.57 0.01 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 615.95 0.09 617.84 ---- -- _ .... ------------ _--Paving-- -0.14 ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 -.-- ----_ ----_ 0 .00 Total 1.14 5.85 4.57 0.01 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.08 0.45 0.45 0.01 615.95 59.67 0.09 0.00 617.84 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site 15 of 23 ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Totel CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r..___.�_...__�..___.�_..._.�.. ___.�_... _.�.. ___.�_... _.�----------- . -__ ..._ ... ---_ -__ Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker 0.03 0.03 0.31 0.00 0.08. 0.00 0.08. 0.00 0.00 0.01 59.67 0.00 59.74 Total 0.03 0.03 0.31 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.01 59.67 0.00 59.74 15 of 23 3.6 Paving - 2014 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road 1.00 5.85 4.57 0.01 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.00 615.95 0.09 617.84 ---- -- _ .--.... ------------ _--Paving-- -0.14 ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 - ----_ ----_ 0 .00 Total 1.14 5.85 4.57 0.01 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.08 0.45 0.45 0.00 615.95 59.67 0.09 0.00 617.84 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 16 of 23 ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Totel CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r..___.�_...__�..___.�_..._.�.. ___.�_... _.�.. ___.�_... _.�----------- . -__ ..._ ... ---_ -__ Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker 0.03 0.03 0.31 0.00 0.08. 0.00 0.08. 0.00 0.00 0.01 59.67 0.00 59.74 Total 0.03 0.03 0.31 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.01 59.67 0.00 59.74 16 of 23 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 71.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Off -Road 0.45 2.77 1.92 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 281.19 0.04 282.03 Total 72.14 2.77 1.92 0.00 PM2.5 0.24 0.24 CO2 0.24 0.24 281.19 Category 0.04 lb/day 282.03 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site 17 of 23 ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Totel CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r..___.�_...__�..___.�_..._.�.. ___.�_... _.�.. ___.�_... _.�--_. ___. -__ ..._ ... - - -_ -__ Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker 0.03 0.03 0.31 0.00 0.08. 0.00 0.08. 0.00 0.00 0.01 59.67 0.00 59.74 Total 0.03 0.03 0.31 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.01 59.67 0.00 59.74 17 of 23 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2014 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 71.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Off -Road 0.45 2.77 1.92 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.00 281.19 0.04 282.03 Total 72.14 2.77 1.92 0.00 PM2.5 0.24 0.24 CO2 0.24 0.24 0.00 281.19 Category 0.04 lb/day 282.03 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Mobile Detail 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 18 of 23 ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Totel CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r..___.�_...__�..___.�_..._.�.. ___.�_... _.�.. ___.�_... _.�--_. ___. -__ ..._ ... - - -_ -__ Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker 0.03 0.03 0.31 0.00 0.08. 0.00 0.08. 0.00 0.00 0.01 59.67 0.00 59.74 Total 0.03 0.03 0.31 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.01 59.67 0.00 59.74 4.0 Mobile Detail 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 18 of 23 4.2 Trip Summary Information ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category 16lday 16lday Mitigated 0.81 1.52 8.21 0.02 1.81 0.07 1.89 0.06 0.07 0.13 ; 1,549.80 ' 0.06 ; 1,551.09 Unmitigated 0.81 1.52 8.21 0.02 1.81 0.07 1.89 0.06 0.07 0.13 ? 1,549.80 0.06 ; 1,551.09 Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Land Use Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT ........... Condo/Townhouse ...................... Parkin Lot 151.57____T___ 0.00 164.68 139.61_ ___,_ __:_ 0.00 0.00 ________505,362_________x__________ 505,362 _______,__ Total 151.57 164.68 139.61 505,362 505,362 4.3 Trip Type Information 19 of 23 Miles Trip % Land Use H -W or C -W IH -S or C -C H -O or C -N W H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Condo/Townhouse Parking Lot 12.70 ..... 8.90 7.00 ........................ 13.30 9.50 7.40 40.20 ............. 0.00 19.20 ........... 0.00 40.60 ........... 0.00 19 of 23 5.0 Enerav Detail 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- TotaICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total PM2.5 CO2 CO2 Category Ib/day Ib/day NaturalGas 0.02 0.15 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 189.94 0.00 0.00 191.10 Mitigated ....................................... .......•........................................ .................................... NaturalGas 0.02 0.15 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 189.94 0.00 0.00 191.10 Unmitigated Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated 20 of 23 NaturalGas Use ROG NO. 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e TCO PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 I Land Use <BTU Ib/day Ib/day 7ando/Townhouse' 1614.49 0.02 0.15 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 189.94 0.00 0.00 ' 191.10 ------ Parking Lot 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.02 0.15 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 189.94 0.00 0.00 191.10 20 of 23 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated DRIT-IT M- Inn I 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area NaturalGas Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 I Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU Ib/day Ib/day Condo/Townhouse1.61449 D.02 0.15 D.06 0.00 D.00 D.01 D.00 0.01 189.94 D.00 0.00 191.10 __.. _............................ .._. _.. .._ .... .._ ...... _.. .._ _ ParkingLot 0 D.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 D.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 D.00 0.00 Total Total 0.02 0.15 0.06 0.00 CO2 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 Ib/day 189.94 Mitigated 3.62 0.14 9.57 0.02 0.00 1.23 0.00 1.23 • 162.30 417.46 0.65 0.01 ' 596.41 0.00 0.00 191.10 DRIT-IT M- Inn I 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 21 of 23 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated 3.62 0.14 9.57 0.02 0.00 1.23 0.00 1.23 • 162.30 417.46 0.65 0.01 ' 596.41 ........... ......}------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ...... p......:------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ----__Unmitigated 3.62 0.14 9.57 0.02 0.00 1.23 0.00 1.23 162.30 417.46 0.65 0.01 596.41 Unmitigated Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 21 of 23 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Coating Consumer 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Products Hearth 2.45 0.11 7.61 0.02 0.00 1.22 0.00 1.22 162.30 414.00 0.64 0.01 592.88 _______P_9_: ------ i------ i------ i------ i------ ______ ______i______ _____ _____ ____ _____ _____ _____ _____ ___ Landscaping 0.06 0.02 1.96 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 .3.46 0.00 .3.53 Total 3.62 0.13 9.57 0.02 0.02 0.00 1.23 1.23 0.00 1.23 162.30 417.46 417.46 0.64 0.01 596.41 Mitigated 22 of 23 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 SubCategory Ib/day I Ib/day Architectural 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Coating _________________________ ------------- ______ ------ ------ r------ �------ �------ �------ �______ ;------ ;------ ;------------- Consumer 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Products ...........:......r_..... ------ ------ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ............ ...... :...... r...... �...... Hearth 2.45 0.11 7.61 0.02 0.00 1.22 0.00 1.22 162.30 414.00 0.64 0.01 592.88 ........... ;------ ------- p...... }...... p...... }...... p...... ...... p...... }...... e------ }_..___p...... }...... p...... }...... Landscaping 0.06 0.02 1.96 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 3.46 0.00 3.53 Total 3.62 0.13 9.57 0.02 0.00 1.23 0.00 1.23 162.30 417.46 0.64 0.01 596.41 22 of 23 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Vegetation 23 of 23 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2011.1.1 Via Lido Orange County, Winter 1.0 Proiect Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size. Metric Parking Lot 58 Space ---------- .... -------- ;.---------------------------- ;------ ---- ............. .- Condo/Townhouse 23 Dwelling Unit 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Climate Zone 8 Precipitation Freq (Days) 30 1.3 User Entered Comments Project Characteristics - Land Use - Lot acreage from Project Plans Construction Phase - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Equipment list from Project Engineer Off-road Equipment - Equipment list from Project Engineer Utility Company Southern California Edison Date: 5/21/2013 1 of 23 Off-road Equipment - Equipment list from Project Engineer Off-road Equipment - Equipment list from Project Engineer Off-road Equipment - Demolition - Grading - Total Disturbed Acres from Site Plan Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Trips and VMT - Demolition Trip Length from Project description 2.0 Emissions Summa 2 of 23 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2013 5.46 40.05 25.70 0.04 7.01 2.16 9.17 3.31 2.16 4.83 0.00 4,530.29 ' 0.00 0.49 0.00 4,540.52 ----------- ------ .__ _ ------ .__ ...... 2014 72.17 29.49 23.67 0.04 0.45 1.81 2.27 0.02 1.81 1.83 0.00 4,016.58 0.00 0.44 0.00 4,025.91 Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Mitigated Construction 3 of 23 ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Totel Bio -CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2013 5.46 40.05 25.70 0.04 5.77 2.16 7.93 1.30 2.16 2.81 0.00 4,530.29 ' 0.00 0.49 0.00 4,540.52 2014 72.17 29.49 23.67 0.04 0.45 1.81 2.27 0.02 1.81 1.83 0.00 4,016.58 0.00 0.44 0.00 4,025.91 Total NA j NA I NA I NA NA I NA NA I NA I NA I NA 1 NA I NA I NA I NA I NA I NA 3 of 23 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- TotaICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category Ib/day Ib/day Area 3.62 0.14 9.57 0.02 0.00 1.23 0.00 1.23 162.30 417.46 0.65 0.01 596.41 ....................-----------. ..___ .____ .._ _ .__ _ ..___ Energy0.02 0.15 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 ' 0.01 f 189.94 0.00 0.00 191.10 ...........:......r..___.�_..._.�.. ___.�_... _.�.. ___.�_... _.�.. __ ..__ ............. .... _. ------ ------ ..._ ------ Mobile 0.87 1.68 8.02 0.02 1.81 0.07 1.89 0.06 0.07 0.14 ? 1,462.71 ' 0.06 ! 1,463.96 Total 4.51 1.97 17.65 0.04 1.81 0.07 3.13 0.06 0.07 1.38 162.30 2,070.11 0.71 0.01 2,251.47 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail 4 of 23 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category Ib/day Ib/day Area 3.62 0.14 9.57 0.02 0.00 1.23 0.00 1.23 162.30 417.46 0.65 0.01 596.41 ...... . .... .... .... ..... .... ... . ..... ...:..... Energy 0.02 Ener 0.02 0.15 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 169.94 0.00 0.00 191.10 Mobile 0.87 1.68 8.02 0.02 1.81 0.07 1.89 0.06 0.07 0.14 ? 1,462.71 ' 0.06 1,463.96 Total 4.51 1.97 17.65 0.04 1.81 0.07 3.13 0.06 0.07 1.38 162.30 2,070.11 0.71 0.01 2,251.47 3.0 Construction Detail 4 of 23 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area 3.2 Demolition - 2013 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.04 0.00 2.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Off -Road 4.63 34.56 21.62 0.03 1.95 1.95 1.95 1.95 ? 3,558.13 0.42 3,566.87 Total 4.63 34.56 21.62 0.03 2.04 1.95 3.99 0.00 1.95 1.95 3,558.13 Category 0.42 lb/day 3,566.87 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site 5 of 23 ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- TotaICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.51 5.41 3.26 0.01 4.77 0.21 4.98 0.03 0.21 0.24 824.24 0.03 824.77 ---------------- .___�.-------- . ___�._____; __. ___�._____; __. ___ ._.. ------ ------ _____ _-_ _Vendor D.00 0.00 D.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor ...........:......r_._.__�_..___�.._._.�_...__�.. _. _.�_...__�.. ............. ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... Worker 0.08 0.09 0.82 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.21 0.01 0.01 0.01 ' 147.92 0.01 148.10 Total 0.59 5.50 1 4.08 1 0.01 j 4.97 j 0.22 j 5.19 j 0.04 j 0.22 j 0.25 j 972.16 j 0.04 972.87 5 of 23 3.2 Demolition - 2013 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r_...__�..___.�_..___�.. -------------- _- .......... _..___ _____ ...... ------ ------ Off-Road 4.63 34.56 21.62 0.03 1.95 1.95 1.95 1.95 0.00 ? 3,558.13 0.42 3,566.87 Total 4.63 34.56 21.62 0.03 0.80 1.95 2.75 0.00 1.95 1.95 0.00 3,558.13 Category 0.42 lb/day 3,566.87 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 6 of 23 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Totel CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.51 5.41 3.26 0.01 4.77 0.21 4.98 0.03 0.21 0.24 824.24 0.03 824.77 ...........:......r-------------- .------- ........... .�_... ------ ------ ----------- -_. _---_ -_. ---_ -__ Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker 0.08. 0.09 0.82 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.21 0.01 0.01 0.01 147.92 0.01 148.10 Total 0.59 5.50 4.08 0.01 4.97 0.22 5.19 0.04 0.22 0.25 972.16 0.04 972.87 6 of 23 3.3 Site Preparation - 2013 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 5.80 0.00 5.80 2.90 0.00 2.90 0.00 _ _ _____-______-__ _ ------ ...........:......r_..___�..___.�_..___�.. --------------------- Off -Road 3.96 31.66 18.62 0.03 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 ? 3,253.39 0.36 3,260.86 Total 3.96 31.66 18.62 0.03 5.80 1.60 7.40 2.90 1.60 4.50 3,253.39 Category 0.36 lb/day 3,260.86 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site 7 of 23 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Totel CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r..___.�_...__�..___.�_..._.�.. ___.�_... _.�.. ___.�_... _.�--_. ___. -_. ..._ ... - - -_ -__ Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r_..__.�..____�_..__.�..____�_..__.�.. ____�_..__.�.. ------------- ..__ ...__ ...... ..__ Worker 0.05 0.05 0.51 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 91.03 0.01 91.14 Total 0.05 0.05 0.51 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 91.03 0.01 91.14 7 of 23 3.3 Site Preparation - 2013 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.26 0.00 2.26 1.13 0.00 1.13 0.00 ...........:......r_..___�..___.�_..___�.._... ._...._�......�_.....}..__ _ .......... ...... Off -Road 3.96 31.66 18.62 0.03 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 0.00 ? 3,253.39 0.36 3,260.86 Total 3.96 31.66 18.62 0.03 2.26 1.60 3.86 1.13 1.60 2.73 0.00 3,253.39 Category 0.36 lb/day 3,260.86 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 8 of 23 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Totel CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r..___.�_...__�..___.�_..._.�.. ___.�_... _.�.. ___.�_... _.�--_. ___. -_. ..._ ... - - -_ -__ Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r_..__.�..____�_..__.�..____�_..__.�.. ____�_..__.�.. ------------- ..__ ...__ ...... ..__ Worker 0.05 0.05 0.51 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 91.03 0.01 91.14 Total 0.05 0.05 0.51 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 91.03 0.01 91.14 8 of 23 3.4 Grading - 2013 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.34 0.00 6.34 3.31 0.00 3.31 0.00 Off -Road 3.67 29.09 16.99 0.03 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 ' 2,941.28 0.33 2,948.20 Total 3.67 29.09 16.99 0.03 6.34 1.51 7.85 3.31 1.51 4.82 0.01 2,941.28 91.03 0.33 0.01 2,948.20 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site 9 of 23 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Totel CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r..___.�_...__�..___.�_..._.�.. ___.�_... _.�.. ___.�_... _.�--_. ___. -_. ..._ ... - - -_ -__ Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r_..__.�..____�_..__.�..____�_..__.�.. ____�_..__.�.. ------------- ..__ ...__ ...... ..__ Worker 0.05 0.05 0.51 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 91.03 0.01 91.14 Total 0.05 0.05 0.51 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 91.03 0.01 91.14 9 of 23 3.4 Grading - 2013 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.47 0.00 2.47 1.29 0.00 1.29 0.00 ...........:......r_.._._..____�_..___�..___.�_..___�.... _.�......}.... ............ _..___ .......................... OR -Road 3.67 29.09 16.99 0.03 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 0.00 ' 2,941.28 0.33 2,948.20 Total 3.67 29.09 16.99 0.03 2.47 1.51 3.98 1.29 1.51 2.80 0.00 2,941.28 91.03 0.33 0.01 2,948.20 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 10 of 23 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Totel CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r..___.�_...__�..___.�_..._.�.. ___.�_... _.�.. ___.�_... _.�--_. ___. -_. ..._ ... - - -_ -__ Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r_..__.�..____�_..__.�..____�_..__.�.. ____�_..__.�.. ------------- ..__ ...__ ...... ..__ Worker 0.05 0.05 0.51 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 91.03 0.01 91.14 Total 0.05 0.05 0.51 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 91.03 0.01 91.14 10 of 23 3.5 Building Construction - 2013 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road 5.21 30.67 21.86 0.04 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 3,565.22 ' 0.47 3,575.00 Total 5.21 30.67 21.86 0.04 PM2.5 1.99 1.99 CO2 1.99 1.99 3,565.22 Category 0.47 lb/day 3,575.00 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site 11 of 23 ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- TotaICG2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _--_ _ ____ ------ ------ --_ _Vendor 0.09 0.98 0.68 0.00 0.06 0.03 0.09 0.00 0.03 0.04 160.72 0.00 160.81 Worker 0.16 0.17 1.64 0.00 0.40 0.01 0.41 0.01 0.01 0.03 295.84 0.02 296.19 Total 0.25 1.15 2.32 0.00 0.46 0.04 0.50 0.01 0.04 0.07 456.56 0.02 457.00 11 of 23 3.5 Building Construction - 2013 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road 5.21 30.67 21.86 0.04 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 0.00 3,565.22 ' 0.47 3,575.00 Total 5.21 30.67 21.86 0.04 PM2.5 1.99 1.99 CO2 1.99 1.99 0.00 3,565.22 Category 0.47 lb/day 3,575.00 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 12 of 23 ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- TotaICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _--_ _ ____ ------ ------ --_ _Vendor 0.09 0.98 0.68 0.00 0.06 0.03 0.09 0.00 0.03 0.04 160.72 0.00 160.81 Worker 0.16 0.17 1.64 0.00 0.40 0.01 0.41 0.01 0.01 0.03 295.84 0.02 296.19 Total 0.25 1.15 2.32 0.00 0.46 0.04 0.50 0.01 0.04 0.07 456.56 0.02 457.00 12 of 23 3.5 Building Construction - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road 4.74 28.45 21.52 0.04 1.77 1.77 1.77 1.77 3,565.22 ' 0.42 3,574.14 Total 4.74 28.45 21.52 0.04 PM2.5 1.77 1.77 CO2 1.77 1.77 3,565.22 Category 0.42 lb/day 3,574.14 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site 13 of 23 ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- TotaICG2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _--_ _ __._ ------------- --_ _ .____ ------ Vendor 0.08 0.88 0.63 0.00 0.06 0.03 0.08 0.00 0.03 0.03 f 161.27 0.00 161.36 Worker 0.15 0.16 1.52 0.00 0.40 0.01 0.41 0.01 0.01 0.03 290.09 0.02 290.42 Total 0.23 1.04 2.15 0.00 0.46 0.04 1 0.49 1 0.01 1 0.04 j 0.06 j j 451.36 j 0.02 451.78 13 of 23 3.5 Building Construction - 2014 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road 4.74 28.45 21.52 0.04 1.77 1.77 1.77 1.77 0.00 3,565.22 ' 0.42 3,574.14 Total 4.74 28.45 21.52 0.04 PM2.5 1.77 1.77 CO2 1.77 1.77 0.00 3,565.22 Category 0.42 lb/day 3,574.14 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 14 of 23 ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- TotaICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _--_ _ __._ ------------- --_ _ .____ ------ Vendor 0.08 0.88 0.63 0.00 0.06 0.03 0.08 0.00 0.03 0.03 f 161.27 0.00 161.36 Worker 0.15 0.16 1.52 0.00 0.40 0.01 0.41 0.01 0.01 0.03 290.09 0.02 290.42 Total 0.23 1.04 2.15 0.00 0.46 0.04 1 0.49 1 0.01 1 0.04 j 0.06 j j 451.36 j 0.02 451.78 14 of 23 3.6 Paving - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road 1.00 5.85 4.57 0.01 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 615.95 0.09 617.84 ---- -- _ .... ------------ _--Paving-- -0.14 ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 -.-- ----_ ----_ 0 .00 Total 1.14 5.85 4.57 0.01 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.08 0.45 0.45 0.01 615.95 55.79 0.09 0.00 617.84 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site 15 of 23 ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Totel CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r..___.�_...__�..___.�_..._.�.. ___.�_... _.�.. ___.�_... _.�----------- . -_. ..._ ... ---_ -__ Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker 0.03 0.03 0.29 0.00 0.08. 0.00 0.08. 0.00 0.00 0.01 55.79 0.00 55.85 Total 0.03 0.03 0.29 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.01 55.79 0.00 55.85 15 of 23 3.6 Paving - 2014 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road 1.00 5.85 4.57 0.01 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.00 615.95 0.09 617.84 ---- -- _ .--.... ------------ _--Paving-- -0.14 ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 - ----_ ----_ 0 .00 Total 1.14 5.85 4.57 0.01 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.08 0.45 0.45 0.00 615.95 55.79 0.09 0.00 617.84 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 16 of 23 ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Totel CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r..___.�_...__�..___.�_..._.�.. ___.�_... _.�.. ___.�_... _.�----------- . -_. ..._ ... ---_ -__ Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker 0.03 0.03 0.29 0.00 0.08. 0.00 0.08. 0.00 0.00 0.01 55.79 0.00 55.85 Total 0.03 0.03 0.29 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.01 55.79 0.00 55.85 16 of 23 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 71.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Off -Road 0.45 2.77 1.92 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 281.19 0.04 282.03 Total 72.14 2.77 1.92 0.00 PM2.5 0.24 0.24 CO2 0.24 0.24 281.19 Category 0.04 lb/day 282.03 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site 17 of 23 ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Totel CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r..___.�_...__�..___.�_..._.�.. ___.�_... _.�.. ___.�_... _.�--_. ___. -_. ..._ ... - - -_ -__ Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker 0.03 0.03 0.29 0.00 0.08. 0.00 0.08. 0.00 0.00 0.01 55.79 0.00 55.85 Total 0.03 0.03 0.29 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.01 55.79 0.00 55.85 17 of 23 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2014 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 71.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Off -Road 0.45 2.77 1.92 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.00 281.19 0.04 282.03 Total 72.14 2.77 1.92 0.00 PM2.5 0.24 0.24 CO2 0.24 0.24 0.00 281.19 Category 0.04 lb/day 282.03 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Mobile Detail 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 18 of 23 ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Totel CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ...........:......r..___.�_...__�..___.�_..._.�.. ___.�_... _.�.. ___.�_... _.�--_. ___. -_. ..._ ... - - -_ -__ Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker 0.03 0.03 0.29 0.00 0.08. 0.00 0.08. 0.00 0.00 0.01 55.79 0.00 55.85 Total 0.03 0.03 0.29 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.01 55.79 0.00 55.85 4.0 Mobile Detail 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 18 of 23 4.2 Trip Summary Information ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category 16lday 16lday Mitigated 0.87 1.68 8.02 0.02 1.81 0.07 1.89 0.06 0.07 0.14 ; 1,462.71 ' 0.06 ; 1,463.96 Unmitigated 0.87 1.68 8.02 0.02 1.81 0.07 1.89 0.06 0.07 0.14 ? 1,462.71 0.06 1,463.96 Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Land Use Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT ........... Condo/Townhouse ...................... Parkin Lot 151.57____T___ 0.00 164.68 139.61_ ___,_ __:_ 0.00 0.00 ________505,362_________x__________ 505,362 _______,__ Total 151.57 164.68 139.61 505,362 505,362 4.3 Trip Type Information 19 of 23 Miles Trip % Land Use H -W or C -W IH -S or C -C H -O or C -N W H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Condo/Townhouse Parking Lot 12.70 ..... 8.90 7.00 ........................ 13.30 9.50 7.40 40.20 ............. 0.00 19.20 ........... 0.00 40.60 ........... 0.00 19 of 23 5.0 Enerav Detail 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- TotaICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total PM2.5 CO2 CO2 Category Ib/day Ib/day NaturalGas 0.02 0.15 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 189.94 0.00 0.00 191.10 Mitigated ....................................... .......•........................................ .................................... NaturalGas 0.02 0.15 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 189.94 0.00 0.00 191.10 Unmitigated Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated 20 of 23 NaturalGas Use ROG NO. 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e TCO PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 I Land Use <BTU Ib/day Ib/day 7ando/Townhouse' 1614.49 0.02 0.15 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 189.94 0.00 0.00 ' 191.10 ------ Parking Lot 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.02 0.15 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 189.94 0.00 0.00 191.10 20 of 23 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated DRIT-IT M- Inn I 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area NaturalGas Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 I Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU Ib/day Ib/day Condo/Townhouse1.61449 D.02 0.15 D.06 0.00 D.00 D.01 D.00 0.01 189.94 D.00 0.00 191.10 __.. _............................ .._. _.. .._ .... .._ ...... _.. .._ _ ParkingLot 0 D.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 D.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 D.00 0.00 Total Total 0.02 0.15 0.06 0.00 CO2 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 Ib/day 189.94 Mitigated 3.62 0.14 9.57 0.02 0.00 1.23 0.00 1.23 • 162.30 417.46 0.65 0.01 ' 596.41 0.00 0.00 191.10 DRIT-IT M- Inn I 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 21 of 23 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated 3.62 0.14 9.57 0.02 0.00 1.23 0.00 1.23 • 162.30 417.46 0.65 0.01 ' 596.41 ........... ......}------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ...... p......:------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ----__Unmitigated 3.62 0.14 9.57 0.02 0.00 1.23 0.00 1.23 162.30 417.46 0.65 0.01 596.41 Unmitigated Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 21 of 23 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Coating Consumer 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Products Hearth 2.45 0.11 7.61 0.02 0.00 1.22 0.00 1.22 162.30 414.00 0.64 0.01 592.88 _______P_9_: ------ i------ i------ i------ i------ ______ ______i______ _____ _____ ____ _____ _____ _____ _____ ___ Landscaping 0.06 0.02 1.96 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 .3.46 0.00 .3.53 Total 3.62 0.13 9.57 0.02 0.02 0.00 1.23 1.23 0.00 1.23 162.30 417.46 417.46 0.64 0.01 596.41 Mitigated 22 of 23 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 SubCategory Ib/day I Ib/day Architectural 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Coating _________________________ ------------- ______ ------ ------ r------ �------ �------ �------ �______ ;------ ;------ ;------------- Consumer 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Products ...........:......r_..... ------ ------ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ............ ...... :...... r...... �...... Hearth 2.45 0.11 7.61 0.02 0.00 1.22 0.00 1.22 162.30 414.00 0.64 0.01 592.88 ........... ;------ ------- p...... }...... p...... }...... p...... ...... p...... }...... e------ }_..___p...... }...... p...... }...... Landscaping 0.06 0.02 1.96 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 3.46 0.00 3.53 Total 3.62 0.13 9.57 0.02 0.00 1.23 0.00 1.23 162.30 417.46 0.64 0.01 596.41 22 of 23 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Vegetation 23 of 23 CONTENTS PAGE No. PROJECT INFORMATION...........................................................................................................1 PROJECT AUTHORIZATION...........................................................................................................1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION...............................................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES............................................................................................1 SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS....................................................................................2 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION...............................................................................................2 REGIONALGEOLOGY.....................................................................................................................2 REGIONAL SEISMICITY.................................................................................................................3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS...........................................................................................................3 GROUNDWATER INFORMATION.....................................................................................................4 LABORATORY TESTING................................................................................................................4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................5 GENERAL....................................................................................................................................5 EARTHQUAKE AND SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS.................................................................5 SITE PREPARATION & GRADING...................................................................................................7 TEMPORARY EXCAVATION CONSIDERATIONS................................................................................9 SHALLOWFOUNDATIONS...........................................................................................................10 PAVEMENTDESIGN....................................................................................................................12 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS.............................................................................................14 PLANREVIEW............................................................................................................................14 OBSERVATION AND TESTING DURING CONSTRUCTION................................................................15 REPORT LIMITATIONS.............................................................................................................15 APPENDIX SITE VICINITY MAP................................................................................................................. FIGURE 1 BORING LOCATION MAP.......................................................................................................... FIGURE 2 BORING LOGS LABORATORY TEST RESULTS LIQUEFACTION OUTPUT FILE L -PILE ANALYSIS N�AR], PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT AUTHORIZATION Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) has completed a geotechnical exploration for the proposed town home/condominium development to be located at the NWC of Via Lido and Via Malaga in Newport Beach, California. The Wieland-Davco Corp. authorized our services on August 7, 2012 by signing PSI proposal 0559-75353 dated August 1, 2012. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Mr. Justin Park of the Wieland-Davco Corp. provided the project information as described herein to PSI. Based on our discussions with Mr. Park and a review of the site plan prepared by Shusin + Donaldson Architects, Inc. for 3355 & 3388 Via Lido, we understand that new at -grade two to three story townhome/condominium buildings and associated improvements are planned to be constructed at the above mentioned addresses in Newport Beach, California. The site is presently occupied by commercial retail buildings along Via Lido (to the east) and a parking lot (to the west). The existing commercial/retail buildings and paving will be demolished to make way for the planned townhomes/condos to be constructed along the property lines and driveways and parking to be constructed between the proposed townhomes/condos. A Site Vicinity Map showing the site location is included as Figure 1 in the Appendix. Detailed structural loading has not been provided to us, however we were informed that loads for a 3 -story wood -framed residential structure on the order of 3 kips per foot for wall footings and 50 kips for columns would be reasonable assumptions. Detailed grading information has also not been provided, however, PSI has assumed that the site grading will consist of cuts and fills of less than 3 feet, not including any remedial grading. The geotechnical recommendations presented in this report are based on the available project information, site location, laboratory testing, and the subsurface materials. If any of the noted information is incorrect, please inform PSI in writing so that we may amend the recommendations presented in this report if appropriate and if desired by the client. PSI will not be responsible for the implementation of its recommendations when it is not notified of changes in the project. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of this geotechnical study was to explore the subsurface conditions and provide suitable foundation recommendations for the proposed construction. The geotechnical exploration for this project involved drilling four test borings, laboratory testing, and geotechnical analyses. This report briefly outlines the testing procedures, presents available project information, describes the site and subsurface conditions, and presents recommendations for the following: Site preparation and grading. Findings pertaining to potentially expansive, deleterious or corrosive materials. An assessment of the liquefaction potential and an estimate of seismic -induced settlements PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 1 NMS . PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA • Recommendations pertaining to design and construction of foundations for support of the proposed construction, including allowable soil bearing pressure, anticipated bearing depths and estimated settlements. • Pavement recommendations including subgrade preparation and construction control of groundwater. • Comments regarding factors that may impact construction and performance of the proposed construction. The scope of services did not include an environmental assessment for determining the presence or absence of wetlands, or hazardous or toxic materials in the soil, surface water, groundwater, or air on or below, or around this site. Any statements in this report or on the boring logs regarding odors, colors, and unusual or suspicious items or conditions are strictly for informational purposes. PSI is concurrently performing a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) at the subject site and a separate report will be issued to address environmental concerns. A geologic fault study to evaluate the possibility of surface faulting at this site was beyond the scope of this investigation. Should you desire a detailed fault study, please contact us; however, active faults are not known to exist on or in the immediate vicinity of the site. Services that investigate or detect the presence of moisture, mold, or other biological contaminants in or around any structure, or any service that was designed or intended to prevent or lower the risk of the occurrence of the amplification of the same, were not provided. Mold is ubiquitous to the environment with mold amplification occurring when building materials are impacted by moisture. Site conditions are outside of PSI's control, and mold amplification will likely occur, or continue to occur, in the presence of moisture. As such, PSI cannot be held responsible for the occurrence or recurrence of mold amplification. SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The project site is located adjacent to the NWC of Via Lido and Via Malaga in Newport Beach, California. Furnished information indicates the approximate site GPS coordinates are latitude: 34.6167°N and longitude: -117.9281°W. The subject site is currently developed with existing commercial/retail buildings along Via Lido (to the east) and a parking lot (to the west. The site is relatively level with a maximum elevation differential of about 2 feet, sloping down to the west (Google Earth, 2011). The site is triangular in shape and bounded by Via Lido to the northeast, Via Malaga to the south and Via Oporto to the west. REGIONAL GEOLOGY The subject site is located at elevations between approximately 6 to 8 feet above mean sea level (Google Earth). Based on a review of the CGS Seismic Hazard Report, Newport Quadrangle, the site is located within the Orange County coastal plain and underlain by Quaternary alluvial and fluvial sedimentary deposits. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 2 MA PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA REGIONAL SEISMICITY The project site is located in Southern California, which has undergone a complex multiphase structural history and remains an active tectonic region with documented historic earthquakes. Generally, the seismicity within California can be attributed to faulting due to regional tectonic movement. This includes the San Andreas Fault and other sub -parallel strike -slip faults, as well as normal and thrust faulting within the State. The area of the subject site is considered seismically active. Seismic hazards within the site can be attributed to potential ground shaking resulting from earthquake events along nearby or more distant faulting. The primary causes of damage in this general area during seismic events include ground shaking and liquefaction of the subsurface strata. Liquefaction occurs when loose granular and low plastic materials below the groundwater table are subjected to cyclic shear forces resulting from seismic events. During seismic shaking the porewater pressure increases with a corresponding decrease in the soils effective stress. Excess pore pressures ultimately dissipate and the soil consolidates, often resulting in significant total and differential settlement of the ground surface. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The boring locations were marked in the field by a PSI representative by referencing existing landmarks based on the information provided by the client. A truck -mounted CME -75 drill rig using mud rotary drilling methods was used to advance the borings. Soil samples were routinely obtained during the drilling process. Drilling and sampling techniques were accomplished general in accordance with ASTM procedures (ASTM D1586 and D3550). The subsurface conditions were explored by drilling four soil borings at this site. Soil borings B1 through B4, were drilled within the existing parking lot to depths ranging from approximately 20 to 50 -feet below the existing ground surface elevation. The locations of our test borings were restricted due to the existing on-site improvements. Figure 2 in the Appendix shows the approximate boring locations. The soil types encountered at the specific boring locations are presented on the attached Boring Logs in the Appendix. As indicated on our boring logs, the existing pavement section generally consists of approximately 3 inches of asphalt underlain by a silty sand with gravel (apparent base course) that was estimated to be about 6 inches thick. The pavement section was underlain by native soil consisting of medium dense silty gravely sand with trace organics that extend to a depth of approximately 5 -feet below existing grade, very soft to soft clayey silt that extends to a depth of approximately 7'/z -feet below existing grade, and loose to very dense slightly silty sand to the maximum depth explored of approximately 50 -feet below the existing ground surface elevation. During the sampling procedure, Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were performed in accordance with ASTM D1586 and relatively undisturbed samples were obtained in general accordance with ASTM D3550. The SPT for soil borings is performed by driving a 2 -inch diameter split -spoon sampler into the undisturbed formation located at the bottom of the advanced borehole with repeated blows of a 140 -pound hammer falling a vertical distance of 30 -inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler the last 12 -inches of an 18 -inch penetration depth is a measure of the soil consistency. For ASTM D-3550 (California Modified PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 3 M2, . PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA Sampler), the split barrel sampler possesses a 3 -inch O.D. and is driven in the same manner as the SPT. The blow count obtained from the California Modified sampler should be reduced by approximately 40 percent to obtain a rough correlation to SPT blow counts (N -value). Samples were identified in the field, placed in sealed containers and transported to the laboratory for further classification and testing. The stratification presented on the Boring Logs is based on a visual examination of the recovered soil samples and the interpretation of field logs by a geotechnical professional. Included on the Boring Logs are the standard penetration resistances (SPT N -values and California Modified sampler blows) recorded in the individual borings at standard testing intervals to the boring termination depths. The above subsurface information is of a generalized nature to highlight the major subsurface stratification features and material characteristics. The Boring Logs, included in the Appendix, should be reviewed for specific information at the boring locations. These records include soil descriptions, stratification, penetration resistance, locations of the samples and laboratory test data. The stratification shown on the logs represent the conditions only at the actual location at the time of our exploration. Variations may occur and should be expected between locations. The stratification that represents the approximate boundary between subsurface materials and the actual transition may be gradual. Lines of demarcation represent the approximate boundary between subsurface materials, and the transition may be gradual. It should be noted that, although the test borings are drilled and sampled by experienced professionals, it is sometimes difficult to record changes in stratification within narrow limits, especially at great depths. In the absence of foreign substances, it is also sometimes difficult to distinguish between discolored soils and clean fill soil. GROUNDWATER INFORMATION Groundwater was measured at approximately 5 -feet below existing grade in all four borings at the time of drilling. Based on a review of the California Geological Survey (CGS) Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Newport Quadrangle, the historic high groundwater depth for the site area is noted to be about 5 feet below grade. It is possible that seasonal variations (temperature, rainfall, tide conditions etc) will cause fluctuations in the groundwater level. Additionally, perched water may be encountered in discontinuous zones within the overburden. The groundwater levels presented in this report are the levels that were measured at the time of our field activities. It is recommended that the contractor determine the actual groundwater levels at the site at the time of the construction activities to determine the impact, if any, on the construction procedures. LABORATORY TESTING The soil samples obtained during the field exploration were transported to our laboratory and selected soil samples were tested in the laboratory to determine the material properties for evaluation. Laboratory testing on selected samples included Moisture Content (ASTM D2216), Unit Weight, Sieve Analysis (ASTM D422 and D1140), Expansion Index testing (ASTM D4829), Corrosion testing (CTM 643, CTM 417 and CMT 422), Atterberg Limit testing (ASTM D4318), and Consolidation (ASTM D2435). Laboratory testing was performed in general accordance PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 4 MA PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA with ASTM and/or California Test procedures. Unless otherwise informed, the soil samples will be discarded 60 days from the issuance of the report. Results of our laboratory testing indicate the tested materials have moisture contents between approximately 3 percent to 54 percent. Consolidation tests were performed on samples at depths of 7'/2 feet, 5 feet, and 10 feet below existing grade at Test Boring Nos. 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and these tests indicated the soils at 7'/z feet and 10 feet in Test Borings Nos. 1 and 3, respectively possess a relatively low compressibility. However the consolidation test performed on the soil sample at 5 -feet in Test Boring No. 2 indicated a high level of compressibility. The corrosion test results indicated the near surface soils are nearly neutral, have a low chloride content, possess a negligible sulfate exposure and resistivity results indicates the materials possess a progressively less corrosive environment for ferrous metals. The results of our Expansion Index testing indicate the near surface soils have a very low expansion potential (EI=O). Laboratory test data along with detailed descriptions of the soils can be found on the Boring Logs in the Appendix. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL The following geotechnical design recommendations have been developed on the basis of the previously described project characteristics and subsurface conditions encountered. If there are any changes in these project criteria, including building location on the site, PSI should be contacted to determine if modifications to the recommendations are warranted. EARTHQUAKE AND SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS The project site is located within a municipality that employs the 2010 California Building Code (CBC), the locally adopted version of the International Building Code, 2009 edition. As part of this code, the design of structures must consider dynamic forces resulting from seismic events. These forces are dependent upon the magnitude Of the earthquake event as well as the properties of the soils that underlie the site. As part of the procedure to evaluate seismic forces, the code requires the evaluation of the Seismic Site Class, which categorizes the site based upon the characteristics of the subsurface profile within the upper 100 feet of the ground surface. To define the Site Class for this project, we have interpreted the results of soil test borings drilled within the project site and estimated appropriate soil properties below the base of the borings to a depth of 100 feet as permitted by the code. The estimated soil properties were based upon our experience with subsurface conditions in the general site area. Based upon our evaluation, the subsurface conditions within the site are consistent with the characteristics of a Site Class "D" as defined in Table 1613.5.2 of the CBC. The associated USGS-NEHRP (2002) probabilistic ground acceleration values and site coefficients for the general site area were obtained from the USGS geohazards web page: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/hazmaps/design Which is presented in Table 1. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 5 MA PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA Table 1: Ground Motion Values* *2% Probability of Exceedence in 50 years for Latitude 33.6167°N and Longitude -117.9281'W **At B -C interface (i.e. top of bedrock). MCE = Maximum Considered Earthquake The Site Coefficients, Fa and F„ presented in the above table were also obtained from the noted USGS webpage, as a function of the site classification and mapped spectral response acceleration at the short (SS) and 1 -second (Si) periods, but can also be interpolated from CBC Tables 1613.5.3(1) and 1613.5.3(2). Hazard Assessment Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone - The seismicity of the site was evaluated utilizing deterministic methods for active faults within the regional vicinity. According to the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act of 1972 (revised 1994) faults have been classified as active faults which show apparent movement during the last 11,000 years (i.e., Holocene time). The site is not located within a currently designated Earthquake Fault Zone per the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone Map produced by the California Geological Survey (CGS). The nearest zoned active fault is the Newport — Inglewood (L.A. Basin) Fault Zone, mapped 0.4 mile to the northwest of the subject site. Lurching and Shallow Ground Rupture — Breaking of the ground because of active faulting is not likely due to the absence of known active fault traces within the project limits. Liquefaction Induced Settlement - Liquefaction and seismically induced settlement typically occur in loose granular and low -plastic silt and clay soils with groundwater near the ground surface. During an earthquake, ground shaking causes the soil to consolidate and an increase in the pore pressures in saturated soils. After dissipation of the excess pore pressures, the saturated soils tend to settle. Fine-grained plastic soils are generally not susceptible to liquefaction or to short-term settlement due to seismic loads. According to the California Geological Survey (CGS) Newport 7.5' Quadrangle hazard map, the subject site is located within an area that is classified as being susceptible to liquefaction and has a historic high groundwater depth of approximately 5 feet below existing ground surface elevation. Our borings indicate depth to groundwater was measured to be at an approximate depth of 5 feet after drilling was completed. In order to evaluate the potential for soil liquefaction at this site, we performed an analysis utilizing the LIQUEFYPRO computer software program. For this analysis, we used a groundwater depth of PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 6 rI� . Mapped MCE Adjusted MCE Design Period Spectral Site Spectral Spectral (sec) Response Coefficients Response Response Acceleration** Acceleration Acceleration 0.2 SS 1.847 Fa 1.0 SMS 1.847 SDs F1.231 1.0 S� 0.695 F 1.5 SM 1.042 SDI 1 0.695 *2% Probability of Exceedence in 50 years for Latitude 33.6167°N and Longitude -117.9281'W **At B -C interface (i.e. top of bedrock). MCE = Maximum Considered Earthquake The Site Coefficients, Fa and F„ presented in the above table were also obtained from the noted USGS webpage, as a function of the site classification and mapped spectral response acceleration at the short (SS) and 1 -second (Si) periods, but can also be interpolated from CBC Tables 1613.5.3(1) and 1613.5.3(2). Hazard Assessment Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone - The seismicity of the site was evaluated utilizing deterministic methods for active faults within the regional vicinity. According to the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act of 1972 (revised 1994) faults have been classified as active faults which show apparent movement during the last 11,000 years (i.e., Holocene time). The site is not located within a currently designated Earthquake Fault Zone per the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone Map produced by the California Geological Survey (CGS). The nearest zoned active fault is the Newport — Inglewood (L.A. Basin) Fault Zone, mapped 0.4 mile to the northwest of the subject site. Lurching and Shallow Ground Rupture — Breaking of the ground because of active faulting is not likely due to the absence of known active fault traces within the project limits. Liquefaction Induced Settlement - Liquefaction and seismically induced settlement typically occur in loose granular and low -plastic silt and clay soils with groundwater near the ground surface. During an earthquake, ground shaking causes the soil to consolidate and an increase in the pore pressures in saturated soils. After dissipation of the excess pore pressures, the saturated soils tend to settle. Fine-grained plastic soils are generally not susceptible to liquefaction or to short-term settlement due to seismic loads. According to the California Geological Survey (CGS) Newport 7.5' Quadrangle hazard map, the subject site is located within an area that is classified as being susceptible to liquefaction and has a historic high groundwater depth of approximately 5 feet below existing ground surface elevation. Our borings indicate depth to groundwater was measured to be at an approximate depth of 5 feet after drilling was completed. In order to evaluate the potential for soil liquefaction at this site, we performed an analysis utilizing the LIQUEFYPRO computer software program. For this analysis, we used a groundwater depth of PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 6 rI� . PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 5 feet (historic high), the soil profile identified in Boring B-1 and a ground acceleration of 0.5g (SDs/2.5, as per the CBC).The results of our analysis indicates that localized zones of the silty sand soils are potentially susceptible to liquefaction upon application of the design site acceleration. Our analysis indicates that the sandy soils between about 7'/z to 10 feet, 26 to 28 feet, and 29 to 30 feet below grade are potentially susceptible to liquefaction upon application of the design earthquake. The most significant effect of soil liquefaction is expected to be ground surface settlement resulting from volumetric strain within the liquefiable soils. Based on our analysis, we estimate a maximum total seismic induced settlement of approximately 1-% inches with an estimated % inch of differential settlement across a 40 foot span. Based on this magnitude of estimated settlement, it is our opinion that mitigation of the liquefaction potential is not warranted. The output file from the analysis is provided within the Appendix. Landslidino — Due to the generally flat nature of the site and surrounding properties, it is our opinion that the site has a low susceptibility to landslides. Tsunamis and Seiches — Based on our review of the Tsunami Inundation Map for Emergency Planning, Newport Beach Quadrangle, dated March 15, 2009, issued by the State of California - Orange County, the site is located within a designated tsunami inundation area. As such the potential does exist for tsunami inundation to impact the site. For Seismic Design Category designations of C, D, E or F, which are contingent on the structures "Seismic Use Group', the code requires an assessment of slope stability, liquefaction potential and surface rupture due to faulting or lateral spreading. Detailed evaluations of these factors were beyond the scope of this study. However, the following table presents a qualitative assessment of these issues considering the site class, the subsurface soil properties, the groundwater elevation and probabilistic ground motions. Table 2: Qualitative Seismic Site Assessments Hazard Relative Risk Comments Liquefaction Moderate Differential seismic induced settlement of about 2/3 inch is estimated across a 40 foot span. Slope Stability Low Based on the presumed grading plans, significant cut or fill slopes are not planned for construction. Surface Rupture Low Active faults are not known to underlie the site. SITE PREPARATION $ GRADING The current geotechnical issues at the site that will affect the construction of the proposed development include the following: 1. Surface and subsurface disturbance during clearing and demolition operations. 2. Shallow groundwater. 3. Potentially liquefiable soils. 4. Soft soil deposits which will require the use of a deep foundation system. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 7 MA PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA Site Preparation Initial site preparation should include stripping of any vegetation, demolition of the existing buildings and removal of the existing pavement that is present within the planned new development areas. Demolition of the existing buildings should include removal of all shallow foundations, floor slabs and underground construction. Existing underground utilities should either be properly capped off at the property boundaries and removed or be re-routed around the new development. Utilities should be removed and properly abandoned in accordance with local regulatory requirements. All soils disturbed by the clearing and demolition operations should be removed, cleaned of deleterious materials and stockpiled on-site for future use as Engineered Fill. All debris and deleterious materials generated by the site stripping and demolition operations should be legally disposed off-site. If the existing buildings are supported by deep foundations, we recommend that the deep foundations be cut-off at least 3 feet below finished grade and to a depth where they will not impact construction of the new foundations. If grading occurs in the winter rainy season, unstable subgrade conditions may be present. These conditions may require stabilizing the subgrade with admixtures, such as cement kiln dust or a coarse aggregate. Isolated areas may be stabilized using a geogrid, such as Tensar TX160 or equal, with one foot compacted Class II aggregate base over the geogrid. Additional recommendations can be provided, as required, during construction. Remedial Grading Following site clearing, demolition and lowering of site grades where needed, we recommend that the soils beneath the new buildings be over -excavated to a depth of at least two feet below existing or finished grade, whichever is deeper. The exposed soils should then be scarified to a depth of approximately 12 inches, be moisture conditioned to about 0 to 3 percent above the soil's optimum moisture content and then be compacted to at least 90 percent of the soil's maximum dry density, per ASTM D-1557. The subgrade within all other development areas of site should be proof rolled with a heavy rubber - tired piece of construction equipment approved by and in the presence of the Geotechnical Engineer. Any soil that ruts or excessively deflects during proof rolling should be removed or stabilized as recommended by the Geotechnical Engineer. Due to the presence of shallow groundwater, some unstable soil requiring removal or stabilization should be expected. The soils exposed at the base of all excavations should be scarified to a depth of at least 12 inches, be moisture conditioned to about 0 to 3 percent above the soil's optimum moisture and compacted to at least 90 percent of the soil's maximum dry density, per ASTM D-1557. However, the top 12 - inches of the pavement subgrade should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the modified Proctor value (ASTM D-1557). Site grades may then be raised with low expansive Engineered Fill to achieve the design elevations at the site. A PSI representative should be on-site during site grading to evaluate the degree of compaction obtained by the contractor. Engineered Fill Engineered Fill material beneath the proposed exterior slabs to support the generators should PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 8 rI� . PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA not contain rocks greater than 3 -inches in diameter or greater than 30 percent retained on the '/4 -inch sieve, and should not contain more than 3 percent (by weight) of organic matter or other unsuitable material. The Expansion Index (EI) for the material should not exceed 40. Based on our subsurface investigation, existing on-site sandy soils are generally suitable for use as Engineered Fill; however, this should be confirmed by a PSI representative during grading. Import materials meeting the above requirements should be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer prior to use as Engineered Fill. The on-site clayey silt soils are not considered suitable for use as Engineered Fill beneath surface improvements. Engineered Fill should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the modified Proctor (ASTM D1557). The moisture content of Engineered Fill should be maintained at approximately 0 to 3 percent above the material's optimum moisture content as determined by the same index during compaction. If the Engineered Fill is too dry, water should be uniformly applied across the affected fill area. If the Engineered Fill is too wet, it must be dried. In either event, the Engineered Fill should be thoroughly mixed by disking to obtain relatively uniform moisture content throughout the lift immediately prior to compaction. Engineered Fill should be placed in maximum lifts of 8 -inches of loose material. Each lift of Engineered Fill should be tested by a PSI soils technician, working under the direction of our Project Geotechnical Engineer, prior to placement of subsequent lifts. Compaction of the backfill should be checked with a sufficient number of density tests by a representative of the Geotechnical Engineer to determine if adequate compaction is being achieved by the contractor. The properly compacted Engineered Fill should extend horizontally outward beyond the exterior perimeter of the foundations a distance equal to the height of fill or 5 -feet, whichever is greater, prior to significant sloping. TEMPORARY EXCAVATION CONSIDERATIONS In Federal Register Volume 54, No. 209 (October, 1989), the United States Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) amended its "Construction Standards for Excavations, 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P." This document was issued to insure better the safety of workers entering trenches or excavations. It is mandated by this federal regulation that all excavations, whether they be utility trenches, basement excavations, or footing excavations, be construction in accordance with the reviewed OSHA guidelines. It is our understanding that these regulations are being strictly enforced and if they are not closely followed, the owner and the contractor could be liable for substantial penalties. The contractor is solely responsible for designing and constructing stable, temporary excavations and should shore, slope, or bench the sides of the excavations as required to maintain stability of both the excavation sides and bottom. The contractor's responsible person, as defined in 29 CFR Part 1926, should evaluate the soil exposed in the excavations as part of the contractor's safety procedures. In no case should slope height, slope inclination, or excavation depth, including utility trench excavation depth, exceed those specified in local, state, and federal safety regulations. We are providing this information solely as a service to our client. PSI is not assuming responsibility for construction site safety or the contractor's activities; such responsibility is not PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 9 MA PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA being implied and should not be inferred. DEEP FOUNDATIONS Due to the presence of the soft and compressible soils at a depth of about 5 feet below grade and the shallow water table, it is our opinion that the proposed buildings should be supported by a deep foundation system that extends through the soft soil deposits and the potentially liquefiable soils and be supported within the underlying medium dense to dense sandy soil deposits. The deep foundation system may consist of cast in-place drilled piers (CIDH), driven pile, auger -cast piles or other propriety systems. We are providing recommendations for CIDH but other systems can be used and PSI can provide supplemental recommendations as needed. CIDH should possess a minimum diameter of 24 inches. Our analysis included a factor of safety of 2 for skin friction and 3 for end bearing. In our analysis, we conservatively assumed that the soils to a depth of 10 feet had no load -carrying capacity (skin friction of zero). Additionally, drag load (negative skin friction) resulting from potential soil liquefaction has been included in the CIDH capacities provided below. Based on our analysis, we anticipate that the drilled piers will have the allowable axial capacities as indicated on the following Table 3 for the various pile lengths noted. Table 3: Allowable CIDH Axial Capacities Versus Depth* CIDH Tip Depth 24 In. Diam.- CIDH 15 Feet 25 Kips 25 Feet 60 Kips 35 Feet 100 Kips *Minimum depth of 15 feet recommended CIDH may be installed on a spacing of 3 pier diameters (center to center) with no reduction in capacity for group effects. CIDH capacities for compressive and uplift loading may be increased by'/ for temporary wind and/or seismic loading conditions. For uplift resistance, we recommend the capacity be based on an average allowable unit skin friction value of 500 psf within the soils below a depth of 10 feet. The upper 10 feet of soil should be neglected in calculating the uplift resistance. We estimate settlement at the base of the CIDH for the design load will be less than % inch. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 10 MA PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA Detailed inspection of CIDH construction should be made to verify that the CIDHs are vertical and founded in the proper bearing stratum, and to verify that all loose materials have been removed prior to concrete placement. Due to the presence of shallow groundwater and sandy soils, temporary casing is recommended to limit sloughing of soil and groundwater intrusion into the drilled shafts. Any accumulated water must be removed prior to the placement of concrete. A hopper and tremie should be utilized during concrete placement to control the maximum free fall of the wet concrete to less than five feet unless the mix is designed so that it does not segregate during free fall and provided the pier excavation is dry. Temporary casing may be removed as the concrete is placed into the drilled shaft keeping a concrete head of at least two feet above the bottom of the casing as it is being removed. Shafts should be clean and be free of all loose materials prior to placement of concrete. The drilled shafts should be installed in accordance with the guidelines provided in FHWA-IF-99-025. A PSI representative should verify the bearing stratum, bearing depth, bearing soil condition, and bearing area and that the pier installation procedures meet the specifications. LATERAL CAPACITIES To assess the deflection, moment and shear capacity of the CIDH piers, the computer software program L -Pile by Ensoft, Inc. was utilized. The analyses were performed for a 24 inch diameter CIDH pier for varying lengths. For the analyses, the bottom of the pile cap was assumed to be at finished grade (no pile cap). Lateral capacities were developed for both free and fixed -head pile conditions. In our analysis, we assumed the soil within the upper 10 feet of grade will have no lateral support capacity. The computer output files for those analyses are included within the Appendix. Once the specific foundation type, dimensions and structural detailing is known, the lateral pile capacities can be re-evaluated. INTERIOR FLOOR SLABS The proposed structures may incorporate a conventional slab -on -grade provided the subgrade is prepared as previously recommended. The on -grade floor slabs should be supported on Engineered Fill. Soft or otherwise unsuitable areas observed should be addressed on a case- by-case basis by our Geotechnical Engineer. Although the slab thickness and steel reinforcement should be determined by the structural engineer, we recommend the floor slab possess a minimum thickness of 5 inches. Where concrete slabs are designed as beams on an elastic foundation, the subgrade should be assumed to have a modulus of subgrade reaction (k -value) of 150 pounds per cubic inch (pci), based on a one foot square plate bearing test. Dependent on how the floor slab load is applied, the above subgrade modulus value may need to be geometrically adjusted. If reducing moisture vapor transmission is a design consideration, we would recommend a vapor retarding membrane be included in the design. Membrane specification should be provided by manufacturer. Vapor retarders should be installed in accordance with ACI 302.1, Chapter 3. A capillary break material (sand) should be provided beneath the vapor retarder. The precautions listed below should be followed closely for construction of all slabs -on -grade. These details will not reduce the amount of movement, but are intended to reduce potential PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 11 MA PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA damage should some settlement of the supporting subgrade take place. Cracking of slabs -on -grade is normal and should be expected. Cracking can occur not only because of heaving or compression of the supporting soil, but also because of concrete curing stresses. The occurrence of concrete shrinkage cracks, and problems associated with concrete curing may be reduced and/or controlled by limiting the water/cement ratio of the concrete, proper concrete placement, finishing, and curing, and by the placement of crack control joints at frequent intervals, particularly, where re-entrant slab corners occur. The American Concrete Institute (ACI) recommends a maximum panel size (in feet) equal to approximately three times the thickness of the slab (in inches) in both directions. For example, joints are recommended at a maximum spacing of 12 feet, assuming a four -inch thick slab. We recommend also that control joints be scored three feet in from, and parallel to, the foundation walls. Using fiber reinforcement in the concrete can also control shrinkage cracking. Some increase in moisture content is inevitable because of development and associated landscaping. However, extreme moisture content increases can be largely controlled by proper and responsible site drainage, building maintenance and irrigation practices. Exterior slabs should be isolated from the building. These slabs should be reinforced to function as independent units. Movement of these slabs should not be transmitted to the building foundation or superstructure. PAVEMENT DESIGN The recommended thicknesses presented below are considered typical and minimum for the assumed parameters. We understand that budgetary considerations sometimes warrant thinner pavement sections than those presented. However, the client, the owner, and the project principals should be aware that thinner pavement sections might result in increased maintenance costs and lower than anticipated pavement life. In designing the proposed paved areas, the existing subgrade conditions must be considered together with the expected traffic use and loading conditions. The conditions that will influence the pavement design can be summarized as follows: 1) Subgrade support characteristics of the subgrade. This is typically represented by a R - Value for the design of flexible pavements in this region. 2) Vehicular traffic, in terms of the number and frequency of vehicles and their range of axle loads. 3) Probable increase in vehicular use over the life of the pavement. We recommend that the exposed subgrade be prepared in accordance with the site preparation requirements specified previously in this report. The upper one foot of pavement subgrade should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the modified Proctor (ASTM D1557). The fill moisture content at the time of compaction should be within 1 to 3 percent above the optimum moisture content value. Undercut soil should be PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 12 Mme, . PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA replaced by Engineered Fill. The appropriate pavement section depends primarily upon the type of subgrade soil, shear strength, traffic load, and planned pavement life. For preliminary purposes, we have assumed Traffic Indices of TI=5.0 for parking areas and TI=6.5 for those driveway and truck lanes subject to relatively heavy traffic. These assumed traffic indices should be verified by the project civil engineer prior to construction. Based on the soils encountered within our test borings, we have assumed an R -value of 30 for the near -surface soils within pavement areas. Since an evaluation of the characteristics of the actual soils at pavement subgrade can only be provided at the completion of grading, the following pavement sections should be used for planning purposes only. Final pavement designs should be evaluated after R -value tests have been performed on the actual subgrade material. It should be noted that additional earthwork and/or ground improvement efforts may be required during grading on the actual subgrade material, in order to achieve the aforementioned design parameters and assumptions. These design thicknesses assume that a properly prepared subgrade has been achieved. Table 4: Flexible Pavement Recommendations Pavement Assumed Recommended Pavement Loading Traffic Section Conditions Index Standard Duty 5.0 3 inches AC over 6 -inches (Parking Areas) Class 11 Aggregate Base Heavy Duty 6"5 4 inches AC over 8 -inches (Drive Aisles) Class II Aggregate Base Concrete pavement is recommended in areas that receive continuous repetitive traffic such as loading areas and parking lot entrances. Due to heavy wheel loads and impact loads, concrete approach aprons and dumpster pads, should have a minimum thickness of 6 inches, with an underlying 4 -inch thick section of Class II Aggregate Base (AB). Portland Cement Concrete pavement sections should incorporate appropriate steel reinforcement and crack control joints as designed by the project structural engineer. We recommend that sections be as nearly squared as possible and no more than 15 -feet on a side. A minimum 3,500 psi mix is recommended. The actual design should also be in accordance with design criteria specified by the governing jurisdiction. Asphalt Concrete (AC), Portland Cement Concrete, and Class II aggregate base should conform to and be placed in accordance with the latest revision of the California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications and American Concrete Institute (ACI) codes. Aggregate base should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the modified Proctor (ASTM D1557) prior to placement of AC. Subgrade preparation for pavement areas is included in the Site Preparation section of this report. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 13 MA PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS Moisture Sensitive Soils/Weather Related Concerns Note that the upper soils are sensitive to disturbances caused by construction traffic and to changes in moisture content. During wet weather periods, increases in the moisture content of the soil can cause significant reduction in the soil strength and support capabilities. Furthermore, perched groundwater conditions can develop during periods of heavy rainfall as a result of less permeable layers impeding infiltration. In these instances, overlying subgrade soils may become unstable and require remedial measures. It will, therefore, be advantageous to perform earthwork and foundation construction activities during dry weather. Groundwater was measured to be approximately 5 -feet below existing ground surface elevation. It should be noted, however, that variations in the groundwater table may result from fluctuation in the ground surface topography, subsurface stratification, precipitation, irrigation, and other factors that may not have evident at the time of our exploration. This sometimes occurs where relatively impermeable and/or cemented materials are overlain by fill soils. We recommend that a representative of PSI be present during grading operations to evaluate areas of seepage. Drainage devices for reduction of water accumulation can be recommended if these conditions occur. Water should not be allowed to collect in the foundation excavation, on floor slab areas, or on prepared subgrades of the construction area either during or after construction. Undercut or excavated areas should be sloped toward one corner to facilitate removal of any collected rainwater, groundwater, or surface runoff. Positive site drainage should be provided to reduce infiltration of surface water around the perimeter of the building and beneath the floor slabs. The grades should be sloped away from the building and surface drainage should be collected and discharged such that water is not permitted to infiltrate the backfill and floor slab areas of the building. Corrosive Soil Concerns The corrosive testing on a representative sample of the site soils indicates that the soils possess a negligible sulfate exposure. Based on this result, it is our opinion that special sulfate - resistant concrete mix designs are not warranted and Type II cement may be used. Additional testing should be performed during site grading to assess the sulfate content of the as -graded soils. The resistivity results indicate a progressively less corrosive environment for metal pipes. We suggest that a corrosion engineer be consulted to determine what corrosion protection may be warranted at this site. PLAN REVIEW Once final design plans and specifications are available, a review of grading and foundation plans by PSI is recommended as a means to check that the evaluations made in preparation of this report are correct and that earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 14 MA PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA OBSERVATION AND TESTING DURING CONSTRUCTION It is recommended that PSI be retained to provide observation and testing services during for newly proposed construction. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications and recommendations, and to allow for possible changes in the event that subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. REPORT LIMITATIONS The proposed professional services have been performed, findings obtained, and recommendations prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices at the time of this report. PSI is not responsible for the conclusions, opinions, or recommendations made by others based on this data. No other warranties are implied or expressed. The Wieland-Davco Corp., its subsidiaries and affiliates can rely upon the report under the same terms as if it was originally prepared for them. The scope of exploration was intended to evaluate soil conditions within the influence of the proposed foundations. The analyses and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the soil borings performed at the locations indicated. If any subsoil variations become evident during the course of this project, a re-evaluation of the recommendations contained in this report will be necessary after we have had an opportunity to observe the characteristics of the conditions encountered. The applicability of the report should also be reviewed in the event significant changes occur in the design, nature, or location of the proposed improvements. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 15 MA PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA NEWPORT BEACH, CA APPENDIX PSI REPORT 0559771 AUGUST 24, 2012 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 16 MA iOPO! map printed on 08/23/12 from 'Untitled,tpo" 0 5 I IN NATIONAL "" r1211 GEOGRAPHIC 5 X lkI MISS OE/23/12 Information PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI / W X71 b DATE: NWC OF VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA PROJECT — To Build On 8/23/12 � Ji 1 NUMBER: �� '• tP o W. Ning�RJ' �, c 6330 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE B BY: ZM SITE VICINITY MAP SUBJECT CYPRESS, CALIFORNIA �Ojh _ e _ e 1 �Jr -F..'S a 4eutel St^ — mi er St �' eIN St ; 4 e �.. SS, •�' � a W •` ; 4%n b'f {... 4` lyY�t�T. l � /3i tent t "'caw Aa N� ;.,teem �� comm; V4` NEWPORT BEACF I�� Pna.D ;.S011nnatD, P i H Sr e 2 f16 y. �k s -.IS Be ¢dNew 14vf^ CDaYgyy,,lt. 41 _. ach } q`le. 4 FOrn 2 0 5 I IN NATIONAL "" r1211 GEOGRAPHIC 5 X lkI MISS OE/23/12 Information PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI / W X71 b DATE: NWC OF VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA PROJECT — To Build On 8/23/12 � Ji 1 NUMBER: �� '• tP o W. Ning�RJ' �, c 6330 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE B BY: ZM SITE VICINITY MAP SUBJECT CYPRESS, CALIFORNIA SITE° lyY�t�T. l � /3i tent t "'caw Aa N� ;.,teem �� comm; Nis _ Ij+ 34 ` ° F `wo p�R7 a NEWPORT BEACF .,,,ro;v Wgah wB y Be ¢dNew 14vf^ CDaYgyy,,lt. 41 _. ach } q`le. 4 FOrn ?yA/r 2 Map created 10it190M ©2010 Na" Ge grap*; ©2007 Tee Atlas, Rd. 1/2007 l 17-57 000' W 117- 6A M0' W 117 -SS nn0' W W[;SR4117^54 Alin. W 0 5 I IN NATIONAL "" r1211 GEOGRAPHIC 5 X lkI MISS OE/23/12 Information PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI / W X71 b DATE: NWC OF VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA PROJECT — To Build On 8/23/12 IRVINE, CA NUMBER: Engineering a Consulting a Testing 0559771 PSI, INC. DRAWN FIGURE 6330 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE B BY: ZM SITE VICINITY MAP CYPRESS, CALIFORNIA rofessional Service Industries, Inc. Gateway Drive, Suite B Cypress, Cypress, CA 90630 LOG OF BORING B1 =,W Telephone: (714)484-8600 Fax: 714 484-8601 Sheet 1 of 2 PSI Job No.: 0559771 Drilling Method: Mud Rotary WATER LEVELS Project: Proposed Townhome/Condo Development Sampling Method:2-in SS 1: While Drilling feet Location: NWC Via Malaga 8 Via Lido Hammer Type: Automatic 1 Upon Completion 5 feet Newport Beach, CA Boring Location: T Delay N/A Station: N/A STANDARD PENETRATION ^� Offset: N/A o t TEST DATA M 6 =e N in blowsift O o t s d Z a MATERIAL DESCRIPTION tO g m = X Moisture 0 t PL LL Additional "> E E z ° n Remarks o y 3 W STRENGTH, tsf m ♦ Ou X Op (1 ASPHALT, 3 inches � 0 ° 4.0 Silty SAND, light brown, damp i SM 1Apparent Base I Silty SAND with Grave) trace organics, light to dark brown, wet, medium dense SM 9 X DD - 128 pd 1 18 14/15/22 N=37 5 Sandy GRAVEL, light to dark brown, C)° 2 6 subangular gravel sand mixture, trace 5/7/12 o p organics GW N=19 O SiltySAND, trace gravel, trace organics, 30 X DD = 93 pcf 3 18 grey-brown, wet, loose 1/3/6 0 N=9 10 medium dense 4 18 7/13/18 0 N=31 15 Fines=6.0 5 18 6/8/9 0 N=17 -20- 6 18 8/12/15 ° N=27 25 Fines=5.1 7 18 7/7/11 a N=18 M!S 30 Continued Next Page Completion Depth: 51.5 It Sample Types: Shelby Tube Latitude: 33.616706° Date Boring Started: 8/13/12 Auger Cutting Hand Auger Longitude: -117.928053° Drill Rig: CME 75 Date Boring Completed: 8/13/12 Split-Spoon Calif. Sampler Remarks: Logged By: ZM Drilling Contractor: Cal-Pac Rock Core Texas Cone The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. rofessional Service Industries, Inc. Gateway Drive, Suite B Cypress, Cypress, CA 90630 LOG OF BORING B1 =,W Telephone: (714)484-8600 Fax: 714 484-8601 Sheet 2 of 2 PSI Job No.: 0559771 Drilling Method: Mud Rotary WATER LEVELS Project: Proposed Townhome/Condo Development Sampling Method:2-in SS 1: While Drilling feet Location: NWC Via Malaga 8 Via Lido Hammer Type: Automatic 1 Upon Completion 5 feet Newport Beach, CA Boring Location: T Delay N/A Station: N/A STANDARD PENETRATION ^� Offset: N/A o t TEST DATA M 6 =e N in blows/ft o0 o ru t J s t- d Z a MATERIAL DESCRIPTION tO g m = X Moisture 0 t PL LL Additional "> E E z ° n Remarks o y 3 W STRENGTH, tsf ♦ Qu X Qp 30 Silty SAND, trace gravel, trace organics, 0 ° 4.0 8 18 grey -brown, wet, loose 13/19/26 a dense N=45 -35- 9 18 14/18/23 ,o N=41 40 Fines=5.00 10 18 10/15/20 N=35 45 very dense 11 18 17/26/36 » N=62 50 dense 12 18 16/22/16 N=38 Boring Terminated at 51.5 feet Groundwatermeasured at approximately 5 It after drilling Boring backfilled with bentonite and capped with asphalt Completion Depth: 51.5 ftJfRock ple Types: Shelby Tube Latitude: 33.616706° Date Boring Started: 8/13/12uger Cutting Hand Auger Longitude: -117.928053° Drill Rig: CME 75 Date Boring Completed: 8/13/12 plit-Spoon Calif. Sampler Remarks: Logged By: ZM Drillin Contractor: Cal-Pac Core Texas Cone The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. rofessional Service Industries, Inc. Gateway Drive, Suite B Cypress, =MWIF Cypress, CA 90630 LOG OF BORING B2 Telephone: (714)484-8600 Fax: 714 484-8601 Sheet 1 of 2 PSI Job No.: 0559771 Drilling Method: Mud Rotary WATER LEVELS Project: Proposed Townhome/Condo Development Sampling Method:2-in SS � While Drilling feet Location: NWC Via Malaga 8 Via Lido Hammer Type: Automatic 1 Upon Completion 5 feet Newport Beach, CA Boring Location: T Delay N/A Station: N/A STANDARD PENETRATION ^� Offset: N/A o t TEST DATA M 6 = e N in blowsift O o t s d Z a MATERIAL DESCRIPTION tO g m = X Moisture 0 t PL LL Additional "> E E z ° n Remarks o y 3 W STRENGTH, taf m ♦ Ou X Op D ASPHALT, 3 inches 0 0 4.a Silty SAND, trace gravels, light brown, moist i SM Apparent Base _ _I Silty SAND, trace organics,liight to dark brown, wet, medium dense SM 9 X DD = 99 pcf 1 18 7/8/9 ° N=17 5 Clayey SILT, trace organics, grey -brown, 54 Do = 61 pcf 2 18 wet, very soft 2/1/1 0 MH N=2 Silty SAND, trace organics, grey -brown, wet, Fines=8.8% 3 18 medium dense 3/5/10 ° N=15 4 25 DD = 102 pcf 4 18 5/10/16 Fines=10.1 N=26 _15- 55 5 18 6/7/9 N=16 M/S -20- 06 6 18 8/8/11 N=19 -25- 57 7 18 7/12116 a N=28 30 Continued Next Page Completion Depth: 31.5 It Sample Types: Shelby Tube Latitude: 33.616706° Date Boring Started: 8/13/12 Auger Cutting Hand Auger Longitude: -117.928053° Drill Rig: CME 75 Date Boring Completed: 8/13/12 Split -Spoon Calif. Sampler Remarks: Logged By: ZM Drilling Contractor: Cal-Pac Rock Core Texas Cone The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. rofessional Service Industries, Inc. Gateway Drive, Suite B Cypress, Cypress, CA 90630 LOG OF BORING B2 =,W Telephone: (714)484-8600 Fax: 714 484-8601 Sheet 2 of 2 PSI Job No.: 0559771 Drilling Method: Mud Rotary WATER LEVELS Project: Proposed Townhome/Condo Development Sampling Method:2-in SS 1: While Drilling feet Location: NWC Via Malaga 8 Via Lido Hammer Type: Automatic 1 Upon Completion 5 feet Newport Beach, CA Boring Location: T Delay N/A Station: N/A STANDARD PENETRATION ^� Offset: N/A o t TEST DATA M 6 =e N in blows/ft o0 o ru t J s t- d Z a MATERIAL DESCRIPTION tO g m X Moisture 0 t PL LL Additional "> E E z ° n Remarks O V) N0 o y 3 W W of STRENGTH, tsf ♦ Qu X Qp 30 Silty SAND, trace organics, grey -brown, wet, 0 ° 4.01 8 18 medium dense 13/16/16 0 dense N=32 Boring Terminated at 31.5 ft Groundwater measured at approximately 5 ft after drilling Boring backfilled with bentonite and capped with ashpalt Completion Depth: 31.5 It Sample Types: Shelby Tube Latitude: 33.616706° Date Boring Started: 8/13/12 Auger Cutting Hand Auger Longitude: -117.928053° Drill Rig: CME 75 Date Boring Completed: 8/13/12 Split -Spoon Calif. Sampler Remarks: Logged By: ZM Drilling Contractor: Cal-Pac Rock Core Texas Cone The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. Professional Service Industries, Inc. - Gateway Drive, Suite B Cypress, CA 90630 LOG OF BORING B3 Telephone: (714)484-8600 Fax: 714 484-8601 Sheet 1 of 2 PSI Job No.: 0559771 Drilling Method: Mud Rotary WATER LEVELS Project: Proposed Townhome/Condo Development Sampling Method:2-in SS 1: While Drilling feet Location: NWC Via Malaga 8 Via Lido Hammer Type: Automatic 1 Upon Completion 5 feet Newport Beach, CA Boring Location: T Delay N/A Station: N/A STANDARD PENETRATION ^� Offset: N/A o t TEST DATA M 6 =e N in blowsift O o t s d Z a MATERIAL DESCRIPTION tO g m = X Moisture 0 t PL LL Additional "> E E z ° n Remarks o y 3 W STRENGTH, taf m ♦ Ou X Op D ASPHALT, 3 inches o 0 4.0 Silty SAND, trace gravels, light brown, moist i SM Apparent Base _ _I Silty SAND, trace organics,liight to dark brown, wet, loose SM 3 X DD = 105 pcf 1 18 5/5/6 N=11 5 85 DD = 68 pcf Clayey SILT, trace organics, grey -brown, L = 66 2 18 very soft 1/1/1 o PL=34 MH N=2 Silty SAND, trace organics, grey -brown, wet, 32 X DD = 93 pcf 3 18 medium dense 3/8/10 a N=18 10 20 Do = 109 pcf 4 18 4/9/15 N=24 _15- 55 5 18 6/8/10 a N=18 M/S -20- 06 6 18 7/8115 0 N=23 _25- 57 7 18 8/13114 0 N=27 30 Continued Next Page Completion Depth: 31.5 It Sample Types: Shelby Tube Latitude: 33.616706° Date Boring Started: 8/13/12 Auger Cutting Hand Auger Longitude: -117.928053° Drill Rig: CME 75 Date Boring Completed: 8/13/12 Split -Spoon Calif. Sampler Remarks: Logged By: ZM Drilling Contractor: Cal-Pac Rock Core Texas Cone The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. rofessional Service Industries, Inc. Gateway Drive, Suite B Cypress, Cypress, CA 90630 LOG OF BORING B3 =,W Telephone: (714)484-8600 Fax: 714 484-8601 Sheet 2 of 2 PSI Job No.: 0559771 Drilling Method: Mud Rotary WATER LEVELS Project: Proposed Townhome/Condo Development Sampling Method:2-in SS 1: While Drilling feet Location: NWC Via Malaga 8 Via Lido Hammer Type: Automatic 1 Upon Completion 5 feet Newport Beach, CA Boring Location: T Delay N/A Station: N/A STANDARD PENETRATION ^� Offset: N/A o t TEST DATA M 6 =e N in blows/ft o0 o ru t J s t- d Z a MATERIAL DESCRIPTION tO g m X Moisture 0 PL t LL Additional "> E E z ° n Remarks O V) N0 o y 3 W W of STRENGTH, tsf ♦ Qu X Qp 0 ° 4.01 30 Silty SAND, trace organics, grey -brown, wet, 8 18 medium dense 11/16/17 0 dense N=33 Boring Terminated at 31.5 ft Groundwater measured at approximately 5 ft after drilling Boring backfilled with bentonite and capped with asphalt Completion Depth: 31.5 It Sample Types: Shelby Tube Latitude: 33.616706° Date Boring Started: 8/13/12 Auger Cutting Hand Auger Longitude: -117.928053° Drill Rig: CME 75 Date Boring Completed: 8/13/12 Split -Spoon Calif. Sampler Remarks: Logged By: ZM Drilling Contractor: Cal-Pac Rock Core Texas Cone The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. Professional Service Industries, Inc. - Gateway Drive, Suite B Cypress, CA 90630 LOG OF BORING B4 Telephone: (714)484-8600 Fax: 714 484-8601 Sheet 1 of 1 PSI Job No.: 0559771 Drilling Method: Mud Rotary WATER LEVELS Project: Proposed Townhome/Condo Development Sampling Method:2-in SS 1: While Drilling feet Location: NWC Via Malaga 8 Via Lido Hammer Type: Automatic 1 Upon Completion 5 feet Newport Beach, CA Boring Location: T Delay N/A Station: N/A STANDARD PENETRATION ^� Offset: N/A o t TEST DATA M 6 =e N in blows/ft o0 o ru t J s t- d Z a MATERIAL DESCRIPTION tO g m = X Moisture 0 t PL LL Additional "> E E z ° n Remarks o y 3 W STRENGTH, taf m ♦ Ou X Op 0 ASPHALT, 3 inches 0 ° 4.0 Silty SANQ trace gravels, light brown, moist i SM Apparent Base _ _I Silty SAND, trace organics,liight to dark brown, wet, loose SM 16 X DD = 93 pcf 1 18 6/7/8 ° N=15 5 Clayey SILT, trace organics, grey-brown, 87 D D = 59 pcf 2 18 wet, soft 1/2/3 ° MH N=5 Silty SANQ trace organics, grey-brown, wet, 31 X DD = sz pcf 3 18 loose 4/5/5 ° N=10 10 medium dense 4 18 11/18/20 ID N=38 M/S 15 loose 5 18 4/4/5 0 N=9 20 medium dense 6 18 6111113 N=24 Boring Terminated at 21.5 ft Groundwater measured at approximately 5 ft after drilling Boring backfilled with bentonite and capped with asphalt Completion Depth: 21.5 It Sample Types: Shelby Tube Latitude: 33.616706° Date Boring Started: 8/13/12 Auger Cutting Hand Auger Longitude: -117.928053° Drill Rig: CME 75 Date Boring Completed: 8/13/12 Split-Spoon Calif. Sampler Remarks: Logged By: ZM Drilling Contractor: Cal-Pac Rock Core Texas Cone The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. CONSOLIDATION TEST - ASTM D2435 PSI # 553779 Job No. 2008-026 Boring Sample No. • Date 08-15-12 •' '��w!!�1� , . ■■■■■�II�■■■■■111 . ■■■■■�11�►�7�■w■�II�■■■■■III �■■■■■�11���■�f��11�■■■■■III ' . ' ' . �■■■■■�11�■f■■■SII III III o"Submerged SII III �■■■■■�11�■■■■■�11 ■■■■■�11�■■■■■SIIIII �■■■■■�11�■■■■■�11 �■■■■■�11�■■■■■SII �■■■■■�II�■■■■■�11�■■■■■III .. �■■■■■�11�■■■■■�II�■■■■■III �■■■■■�11�■■■■■�11�■■■■■III .■■r--'"---m"2■111�■■■■■III ' ' , . ■■�11�■■■■■III ■■�11�■■■■■III 9 Water �Initial Water ,;_ - = �■■� ■■I ■■�11�■■■■■III ■■�11�■■■■■III 1■�11�■■■■■III �■■� �■■� '' .' �■■■■■iiia■■■■■iiia■■■■■iii :. �■■■■■�II�■■■■■�II�■■■■■III �■■■■■�11�■■■■■�11�■■■■■SII ", :: �■■■■■�11�■■■■■�11�■■■■■SII ' �■■■■■iiia■■■■■iiia■■■■■iii , : �■■■■■�II�■■■■■�11�■■■■■III ' �■■■■■�11�■■■■■�11�■■■■■III �■■■■■�II�■■■■■�II�■■■■■III , :. �■■■■■�II�■■■■■�II�■■■■■III �■■■■■�11�■■■■■�11�■■■■■III , : �■■■■■�11�■■■■■�11�■■■■■III �■■■■■�11�■■■■■�11�■■■■■III .: �■■■■■�11�■■■■■�II�■■■■■III �■■■■■�II�■■■■■�11�■■■■■III Geo -Logic CONSOLIDATION TEST - ASTM D2435 PSI # 553779 Job No. 2008-026 Boring Sample No. B-2 Date 08-15-12 ' " MEN Natural MEN ���iii ����iiii■■i • Submerged iii MEN F. Sandy SlIt in Dry Density: 61.3 pcf in Initial Water Content: 54.4 % in Final Water Content: 34.8 % in H20 @ 100 PSF in ���i�■iii�����■iiii���iiiiii _ sells Geo, Logic CONSOLIDATION TEST - ASTM D2435 PSI # 559-779 Job No. 2008-026 C• • • - No. • 1 1 Date 08-15-12 �� .. ������ �!-�:i'.�G .ice■■■■■-���■■■■■ m N Vk'F2Z'lCvsi~I ?I■70ftia-MIi■. "M70■ON■■■■■ MEN ����■■■■■����■■■■■ ■■■ MEN Natural 001 MEN 001 MEN . ��MM■■■■■��= I■■■ F.M. Silty Sand in Dry Density: 108.5 pcf in Initial water content: 20.2 % in Final Water Content: 20.0 % in H20 @ 100 PSF in �. 1 .; sells Geo, Logic PSI # 559-771 SOIL TEST RESULTS Job No. 2008-026 SAMPLE NO.: B-4 @ 0 -3 - DESCRIPTION F.M. Sand DIRECT SHEAR TEST (type) Initial Moisture Content % Dry Density cf Normal Stress sf Peak Shear Stress (psf) Ultimate Shear Stress sf Cohesion sf Internal Friction Angle (degrees) EXPANSION TEST UBC STD 18-2 Initial Dry Density cf Initial Moisture Content % Final Moisture Content % Pressure sf Expansion Index Swell % CORROSIVITY TEST Resistivity CTM643) (ohm -cm 11150 pH (CTM643) 7.8 CHEMICAL TESTS Soluble Sulfate CTM 417 m 156 Chloride Content (CTM 422) (ppm) 99 Wash #200 Sieve ASTM -1140 % Sand Equivalent (ASTM D2419) Geo, Logic EXPANSION INDEX - UBC 18-2 & ASTM D 4829-88 PROJECT PSI # 559-771 JOB NO. 2008-026 Sample B-4 @ 0-3.0' By LD Sta. No. Soil Type Brown, F.M. Sand Sample By Sta. No. Soil Type Date Time Dial Reading Wet+Tare 595.4 Date Dial Reading Wet+Tare 8/20/2012 15:00 0.1253 Tare 219.6 Tare H2O Net Weight 375.8 Net Weight 8/21/2012 10:30 0.1259 % Water 12.5 % Water Dry Dens. 101.2 Dry Dens. % Max % Max Wet+Tare 619.5 Wet+Tare Tare 219.6 Tare Net Weight 399.9 Net Weight INDEX -1 -0.1% % Water 19.7 INDEX % Water Sample By Sta. No. Soil Type Sample By Sta. No. Soil Type Date Dial Reading Wet+Tare Date Dial Reading Wet+Tare Tare Tare Net Weight Net Weight % Water % Water Dry Dens. Dry Dens. % Max % Max Wet+Tare Wet+Tare Tare Tare Net Weight Net Weight INDEX % Water INDEX % Water Geologic Associates GRAVEL i SAND SILT AND CLAY COARSE FINE I COARSE MEDIUM FINE J. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES HYDROMETER 40 1 100 90 80 70 F x LO 60 LLI CIO 50 i N to a 40 0- h z Lu 30 K w a 20 10 0 100 50 20 10 5 2 1 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.005 0.002 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS Exploration No. Sample No. Depth (ft) SYMBOL Win (0/a) LL PI % Clay Description and Classification D 60 U 30 D 10 C„ C, B1 15.0 • Silty Sand with trace organics 0.14 0.09 0.08 1.8 0.7 ■ O PROJECT NAME: Newport Beach, CA Townhomes/Condos PARTICLE -SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVES PROJECT NUMBER: 0559771 (SNA) sieve only (01/2000) SIEVEBI@15.xlsx PSI L 2 QU E FACT2 ON ANA LYS 2 5 S U MMARY Co pWwr i g.h t by c i v i l Te c h S o Ftwa r e w _ ci vi -1 techs o-Ftw ara _ com ^ Font'cCOuri er New Re9u7 ar, S -Sze $ i s re.commarid ed -Far thi s report _ LlCerlS ed 'CO $/Z3/ZUtz 4:16:-1U PM TownFromeS\l i queFy _ -1 i q Tl'C7 a NeWPOrt Bea C1"l - TOwflflome5/COr1d05 S u bt i t 7 e o O S S 97 7 1 S u rPa C e E 7 a v_ — oeptlh oP Ho1 a= SO _ 00 �t wane r Ta b l a d u r illi g Ea rt h q u a K a= 5_ 0 0 Pt wa t e r Tab ? e d u r i n g S n- S i to Te s t i. n g= O. 00 -Ft Max _ Acca'1 a ra-ti on= O _ S g E a r t F'lq u a Ke M ag n i t u d e= 7_ B0 i n p u t o ata _ H O 1 e N O_- oaptFr o -F Ho7 e=50 _ 00 'Ft ware r Ta b l e d u r i n g Ea r t F.q u a K e= S_ O O Ft water Tabl a du ri ng zn-Situ Testi rzg= O _ 00 -F-t Max _ Accel a rata on=0 _ S g EartFlquaKe Magrri rude=7 _ 30 NO- Li gUaf'i abs 0 SOti -1 S ] CL , OL ar'e NOn--LI q _ Sai -1 1_ S PT o r B PT Ca -1 C u l at i o n_ 2 _ Sett -1 am Arlt Alla? yS.l S Me tt - iI Flares / 3_ Fi nes s Correct-� o n Fo i clq e'F r L u a ct a n o S d:r i 4 _ Fi ria Carre cti on For Sat t-1 emer-lt = �u ri rig 5' _ Se'C'C7 ement Calcul a -Ci ol-n in o Al 7 zones 6 _--larnme r Erle rg y Ratio , 7 _ BOre1'rOl a of amater', S _ Samp7 i xlg MatF'rod , 9 _ U50r req ur=5t �actOr o -F sa�2Ly �app7 y to P -IOL OTa CSR ClJ rve �-Fs 1: Uses rJ 10 _ U s e C u ry e S mo of h i rtg o N o -= Recommended opt -ions 2 n -Sit u Ta s t O ata _'. O e;pth SPT gamma Fi nes -Ft PCF % O_ O O 2 0_ 0 0 1 16 _ 0 0 5_ 0 0 19 _ 00 3-.-245 O O 5_ (DC) 7 .5 O S 00 110 _ 0 0 S_$ O 1 0_ 00 1 9_ 0 0 1Z 6. 0 0 10 _ 10 1 5_ 00 1 7_ 0C> 3-:a 6_ 0 0 6_ 00 2 0_ 0 0 2 7_ 0 0 1= 6_ 00 6_ 00 Z S CDC) 1$_ 0 0 1:2 6_ 00 S_ 10 3 0_ 0 0 -.4.5 - 00 1 2 6. 00 5_ 10 3 5_ 0 0 4a_ - 00 1 2 6_ 00 5_ 10 Page 1 YO s �l l m l fl a. s sjSeed Li que-Facti ocl� CSR , lJsar= 1 _ 25 1 aLT �, a'tmos pr -r er e> i t5'r LLOrI/'1-L Z� GRRm Cycl i c rasi stance raLi o 'Fr orrm soi l 5 CSRs-F Gycl i c stress rati o i r'rduced by a gi veri eartbquaFca �wtitl-� usar 'request factor a -F sa-FeLy� F _ S _ FaCtOr O"F Sa-Eery agai rnSL 7 i queFacti on , F _ S _ =G.R Rm./CSRS� S_sat Set t7 emerrt From s.a tura-ted sands S_d ry Settl emerit -From ur.satu rated Sar�ds S_a.l 1 Tota -1 SatLl emery -C -From Saturated acrd uric aLu rated Sar -ids I i qua-Ffy _ sum- txt O_ 57 3_ 7 3 O_ OO O_ OO O_ O O O 2_ 14 O_ S 7 3_ 7-7 O_ 00 O_ O O O_ O O " F _ S _ s1 r_i qu a'Facti on Poter'rti al Z:o r.e L`F _ 5 _ l S 1 l Ml "C ed LO S , CRR l S 7 7 m.l 'iEd LO Z , CSR l S 7'1 Ti ied L:O Z� tJ fli LS Uft l'C- qC, 'FS, Stre SS O[' Pr05SUre = atM <1_OS$1t s-F� q Ufli L. Wel gF'2L = P G'F � pe pth = i=t � Sett7 emerit = i n _ 1 aLT �, a'tmos pr -r er e> i t5'r LLOrI/'1-L Z� GRRm Cycl i c rasi stance raLi o 'Fr orrm soi l 5 CSRs-F Gycl i c stress rati o i r'rduced by a gi veri eartbquaFca �wtitl-� usar 'request factor a -F sa-FeLy� F _ S _ FaCtOr O"F Sa-Eery agai rnSL 7 i queFacti on , F _ S _ =G.R Rm./CSRS� S_sat Set t7 emerrt From s.a tura-ted sands S_d ry Settl emerit -From ur.satu rated Sar�ds S_a.l 1 Tota -1 SatLl emery -C -From Saturated acrd uric aLu rated Sar -ids Hydrology Report Via Lido -Newport Beach CA VICINITY MAP II. SOILS AND RAINFALL INTENSITY MAPS IIIR76Y019LY.9NP►I IV. 2, 5, 25, and 100 -YEAR HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS — EXISTING CONDITION V. 2, 5, 25, and 100 -YEAR HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS — PROPOSED CONDITION VI. HYDROLOGY MAP -EXISTING AND DEVELOPED CONDITIONS Prepared by C&V Consulting I. VICINITY MAP Prepared by C&V Consulting Hydrology Report Via Lido -Newport Beach CA s a� J0 Super�rP SBP papfic Coag ryigpw,ay O __. � IX01"' - qc AP y 55 Bn_ ClrB Onve r Park t5� Clift or P n r� West CO." p�fMC yy may 0 D 1111114�,4- I l % SITE ,9ve s 5 321ut 51 = 9 319 SI Jrane�9� L,r `re.. C� 2 'm Rq { 2 9th9 2Mst 4 z S c N a 4,P1 THOMAS BROTHERS GUIDE PAGE 888 GRID H7 VICINITY MAP N.T.S. Hydrology Report Via Lido -Newport Beach CA II. SOILS AND RAIN FALL INTENSITY MAPS From Orange County Hydrology Manual Soil Type: Type "A" Prepared by C&V Consulting III. DISCUSSION Prepared by C&V Consulting Hydrology Report Via Lido -Newport Beach CA Hydrology Report Via Lido -Newport Beach CA III. DISCUSSION Introduction The purpose of the attached analysis is to determine the existing and proposed storm water discharge flow for the project. 3303 Via Lido is located in the City of Newport Beach, CA west of Newport Bay. The proposed development is located on the Balboa Peninsula, in the City of Newport Beach. The Pacific Ocean is located about 2,000 feet to the west of the site, and the Newport Bay is located about 170 feet to the east of the site. The subject project is bound by Via Lido to the northeast, Via Oporto to the West and Via Malaga to the south. The project is situated southeast of the intersection of Newport Blvd and the Pacific Coast highway. The site in approximately 1.2 acres and the topography of the site slopes gently in a northwest direction, at a rate of no more than a third of a percent. Underground storm drain facilities do not exist adjacent to the site. Storm water runoff presently surface flows off the site to the adjacent public streets (Via Lido, Via Oporto and Via Malaga) where they are collecting in surface gutters and conveyed to the north. From there flows are collecting in an off-site catch basin where they empty into the adjacent Newport Bay. The property is designated in FEMA Flood Zone "X" shaded, areas considered to be outside of the 100 -year floodplain, but inside the 500 -year floodplain. Typical to the Balboa Peninsula area, groundwater was found at shallow depths (up to five feet from the surface). This hydrology report will calculate the 2, 5, 25, and 100 -year storm water runoff for this location Existing Conditions The current project site consists of commercials buildings and a parking lot with minimal landscaping. There are no onsite or offsite storm drain systems in the vicinity of the project. The site in approximately 1.2 acres and the topography of the site slopes gently in a northwest direction, at a rate of no more than a third of a percent. Storm water from the site surface flows to the streets and is directed to the curb and gutter system within the streets. Prepared by C&V Consulting Hydrology Report Via Lido -Newport Beach CA Project Description The proposed project includes the removal of the buildings and parking lot on site. The project proposes the construction of 24 residential units and a drive aisle along with the associated site improvements and utilities. The project will include the addition of landscaping within the site area, hence imperviousness within the site will reduce from over 96% to 89%. The proposed condition will utilize similar overall drainage patterns. The improvements promote further percolation into the ground. Hydrology and Calculation Methodology The hydrology study was prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Orange County Hydrology Manual. The 100 -year storm event was used in the study. Values for the 2 -year, 5 -year, and 25 -year storms. Conclusion Due to the fact that the proposed and existing flow patterns are similar, the flows generated from the site are 6% less than the existing conditions. Pervious area is also increased due to introduction of landscaping within the site. A table of pre - and post -construction flows can be seen in the table below: Condition 2 -YR Flow 5 -YR Flow 25 -YR Flow 100 -YR Flow cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs Existing 2.16 3.05 4.64 5.96 Condition Proposed Condition 1.98 2.83 4.33 5.56 Prepared by C&V Consulting Hydrology Report Via Lido -Newport Beach CA IV. 29 55 259 & 100 -YEAR HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS -EXISTING CONDITION Prepared by C&V Consulting SB01E2.RES RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright 1983-2010 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 17.0 Release Date: 07/01/2010 License ID 1580 Analysis prepared by: C&V Consulting DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * VIA LIDO * EXISTING CONDITION * 2 YEAR STORM FILE NAME: SB01 E2.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 15:16 03/06/2013 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: —*TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION MODEL* -- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 2.00 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 18.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *DATA BANK RAINFALL USED* *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) II ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER -DEFINED STREET -SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSS FALL: CURB GUTTER -GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- /OUT -/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE/SIDE/WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) --- ------------------------------- ------ ----- =----- ----- ------- 1 30.0 20.0 0.018/0.018/0.020 0.67 2.00 0.0313 0.167 0.0150 GLOBAL STREET FLOW -DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow -Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top -of -Curb) 2. (Depth)* (Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 150.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< >>USE TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< Page 1 5BOIE2.RE5 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 210.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 9.40 DOWNSTREAM (FEET) = 8.58 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 7.824 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.751 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A 0.48 0.40 0.100 32 7.82 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.74 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.48 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.74 *######*################*######*################*#######################*### FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 250.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< >>USE TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 115.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 10.20 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 9.20 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.240 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.204 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A 0.34 0.40 0.100 32 5.24 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.66 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.34 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.66 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 300.00 TO NODE 350.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< >>USE TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- -------------------------------------------- INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 50.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 27.74 DOWNSTREAM (FEET) = 26.50 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.264 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A 0.38 0.40 0.100 32 5.00 Page 2 SBOIE2.RES SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.76 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.38 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.76 END OF STUDY SUMMARY TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.4 TC(MIN.) = 5.00 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.38 AREA -AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.04 AREA -AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA -AVERAGED Ap = 0.100 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.76 END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS Page 3 SB01E5.RES RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright 1983-2010 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 17.0 Release Date: 07/01/2010 License ID 1580 Analysis prepared by: C&V Consulting DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * VIA LIDO * EXISTING CONDITION * 5 YEAR STORM FILE NAME: SB01 E5.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 15:17 03/06/2013 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: —*TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION MODEL* -- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 5.00 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 18.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *DATA BANK RAINFALL USED* *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) II ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER -DEFINED STREET -SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSS FALL: CURB GUTTER -GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- /OUT -/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE/SIDE/WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) --- ------------------------------- ------ ----- =----- ----- ------- 1 30.0 20.0 0.018/0.018/0.020 0.67 2.00 0.0313 0.167 0.0150 GLOBAL STREET FLOW -DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow -Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top -of -Curb) 2. (Depth)* (Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 150.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< >>USE TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< Page 1 5BOIE5.RE5 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 210.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 9.40 DOWNSTREAM (FEET) = 8.58 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 7.824 * 5 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.477 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A 0.48 0.40 0.100 32 7.82 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.05 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.48 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.05 *######*################*######*#########*######*#######################*### FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 250.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< >>USE TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 115.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 10.20 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 9.20 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.240 * 5 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.103 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A 0.34 0.40 0.100 32 5.24 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.93 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.34 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.93 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 300.00 TO NODE 350.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< >>USE TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- -------------------------------------------- INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 50.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 27.74 DOWNSTREAM (FEET) = 26.50 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000 * 5 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.185 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A 0.38 0.40 0.100 32 5.00 Page 2 SBOIE5.RES SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.07 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.38 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.07 END OF STUDY SUMMARY TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.4 TC(MIN.) = 5.00 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.38 AREA -AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.04 AREA -AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA -AVERAGED Ap = 0.100 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.07 END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS Page 3 SB01E25.RES RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright 1983-2010 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 17.0 Release Date: 07/01/2010 License ID 1580 Analysis prepared by: C&V Consulting DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * VIA LIDO * EXISTING CONDITION * 25 YEAR STORM FILE NAME: S1301 E25.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 15:17 03/06/2013 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: —*TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION MODEL* -- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 25.00 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 18.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *DATA BANK RAINFALL USED* *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) II ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER -DEFINED STREET -SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSS FALL: CURB GUTTER -GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- /OUT -/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE/SIDE/WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) --- ------------------------------- ------ ----- =----- ----- ------- 1 30.0 20.0 0.018/0.018/0.020 0.67 2.00 0.0313 0.167 0.0150 GLOBAL STREET FLOW -DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow -Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top -of -Curb) 2. (Depth)* (Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 150.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< >>USE TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< Page 1 5B01E25.RE5 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 210.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 9.40 DOWNSTREAM (FEET) = 8.58 Tc = K*[(LENGTH*# 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 7.824 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.744 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A 0.48 0.40 0.100 32 7.82 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.60 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.48 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.60 *########################################*######*########################### FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 250.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< >>USE TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 115.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 10.20 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 9.20 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.240 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 4.698 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A 0.34 0.40 0.100 32 5.24 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.41 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.34 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.41 *kkkk#k*k**k*k**k****#***k*******k***k*k*#kkkk***kkk*#k*k**kkk******kk*kkk** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 300.00 TO NODE 350.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< >>USE TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- -------------------------------------------- INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 50.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 27.74 DOWNSTREAM (FEET) = 26.50 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 4.824 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A 0.38 0.40 0.100 32 5.00 Page 2 S601E25.RES SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.63 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.38 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.63 END OF STUDY SUMMARY TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.4 TC(MIN.) = 5.00 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.38 AREA -AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.04 AREA -AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA -AVERAGED Ap = 0.100 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.63 END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS Page 3 SB01E100.RES RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright 1983-2010 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 17.0 Release Date: 07/01/2010 License ID 1580 Analysis prepared by: C&V Consulting DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * VIA LIDO * EXISTING CONDITION * 100 YEAR STORM FILE NAME: SB01 E100.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 15:18 03/06/2013 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: —*TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION MODEL* -- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 100.00 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 18.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *DATA BANK RAINFALL USED* *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) II ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER -DEFINED STREET -SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSS FALL: CURB GUTTER -GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- /OUT -/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE/SIDE/WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) --- ------------------------------- ------ ----- =----- ----- ------- 1 30.0 20.0 0.018/0.018/0.020 0.67 2.00 0.0313 0.167 0.0150 GLOBAL STREET FLOW -DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow -Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top -of -Curb) 2. (Depth)* (Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 150.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< >>USE TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< Page 1 SBOIElOO.RES INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 210.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 9.40 DOWNSTREAM (FEET) = 8.58 Tc = K*[(LENGTH*# 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 7.824 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 4.787 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A 0.48 0.40 0.100 32 7.82 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.05 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.48 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.05 *########################################*######*########################### FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 250.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< >>USE TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 115.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 10.20 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 9.20 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.240 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 6.024 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A 0.34 0.40 0.100 32 5.24 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.81 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.34 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.81 *kkkk#k*k**k*k**k****#***k*******k***k*k*#kkkk***kk***k*k**kkk******kk*kkk** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 300.00 TO NODE 350.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< >>USE TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- -------------------------------------------- INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 50.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 27.74 DOWNSTREAM (FEET) = 26.50 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 6.187 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A 0.38 0.40 0.100 32 5.00 Page 2 S601E100.RES SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.38 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.10 END OF STUDY SUMMARY TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.4 TC(MIN.) = 5.00 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.38 AREA -AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.04 AREA -AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA -AVERAGED Ap = 0.100 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.10 END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS Page 3 Hydrology Report Via Lido -Newport Beach CA V. 27 57 25, & 100 -YEAR HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS - PROPOSED CONDITION Prepared by C&V Consulting SB01D2.RES RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright 1983-2010 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 17.0 Release Date: 07/01/2010 License ID 1580 Analysis prepared by: C&V Consulting DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * VIA LIDO * DEVELOPED CONDITION * 2 YEAR STORM FILE NAME: SB01 D2.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 15:11 03/06/2013 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: —*TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION MODEL* -- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 2.00 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 18.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *DATA BANK RAINFALL USED* *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) II ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER -DEFINED STREET -SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSS FALL: CURB GUTTER -GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- /OUT -/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE/SIDE/WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) --- ------------------------------- ------ ----- =----- ----- ------- 1 30.0 20.0 0.018/0.018/0.020 0.67 2.00 0.0313 0.167 0.0150 GLOBAL STREET FLOW -DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow -Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top -of -Curb) 2. (Depth)* (Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 150.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< >>USE TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< Page 1 5BOID2.RE5 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 130.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 9.91 DOWNSTREAM (FEET) = 8.95 Tc = K*[(LENGTH*# 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 6.060 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.027 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) APARTMENTS A 0.24 0.40 0.200 32 6.06 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.200 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.42 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.24 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.42 *########################################################################### FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 250.00 IS CODE = 21 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< >>USE TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ----------------------------------------------------------------- INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 200.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 9.90 DOWNSTREAM (FEET) = 8.90 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 7.783 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.756 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) APARTMENTS A 0.70 0.40 0.200 32 7.78 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.200 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.06 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.70 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.06 *kkkk#k*k**k*k**k****#***k*******k***k*k*#kkkk***kkk*#k*k**kkk******kk*kkk** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 300.00 TO NODE 350.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< >>USE TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- -------------------------------------------- INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 45.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 10.00 DOWNSTREAM (FEET) = 9.45 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.264 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) APARTMENTS A 0.25 0.40 0.200 32 5.00 Page 2 SB01D2.RES SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.200 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.50 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.25 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.50 END OF STUDY SUMMARY TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.3 TC(MIN.) = 5.00 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.25 AREA -AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.08 AREA -AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA -AVERAGED Ap = 0.200 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.50 END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS Page 3 SB01D5.RES RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright 1983-2010 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 17.0 Release Date: 07/01/2010 License ID 1580 Analysis prepared by: C&V Consulting DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * VIA LIDO * DEVELOPED CONDITION * 5 YEAR STORM FILE NAME: SB01 D5.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 15:11 03/06/2013 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: —*TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION MODEL* -- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 5.00 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 18.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *DATA BANK RAINFALL USED* *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) II ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER -DEFINED STREET -SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSS FALL: CURB GUTTER -GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- /OUT -/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE/SIDE/WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) --- ------------------------------- ------ ----- =----- ----- ------- 1 30.0 20.0 0.018/0.018/0.020 0.67 2.00 0.0313 0.167 0.0150 GLOBAL STREET FLOW -DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow -Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top -of -Curb) 2. (Depth)* (Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 150.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< >>USE TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< Page 1 5BOID5.RE5 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 130.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 9.91 DOWNSTREAM (FEET) = 8.95 Tc = K*[(LENGTH*# 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 6.060 * 5 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.859 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) APARTMENTS A 0.24 0.40 0.200 32 6.06 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.200 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.60 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.24 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.60 *########################################################################### FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 250.00 IS CODE = 21 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< >>USE TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ----------------------------------------------------------------- INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 200.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 9.90 DOWNSTREAM (FEET) = 8.90 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 7.783 * 5 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.484 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) APARTMENTS A 0.70 0.40 0.200 32 7.78 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.200 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.52 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.70 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.52 *kkkk#k*k**k*k**k****#***k*******k***k*k*#kkkk***kkk*#k*k**kkk******kk*kkk** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 300.00 TO NODE 350.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< >>USE TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- -------------------------------------------- INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 45.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 10.00 DOWNSTREAM (FEET) = 9.45 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000 * 5 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.185 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) APARTMENTS A 0.25 0.40 0.200 32 5.00 Page 2 SB01D5.RES SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.200 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.71 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.25 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.7' END OF STUDY SUMMARY TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.3 TC(MIN.) = 5.00 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.25 AREA -AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.08 AREA -AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA -AVERAGED Ap = 0.200 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.71 END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS Page 3 SB01D25.RES RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright 1983-2010 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 17.0 Release Date: 07/01/2010 License ID 1580 Analysis prepared by: C&V Consulting DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * VIA LIDO * DEVELOPED CONDITION * 25 YEAR STORM FILE NAME: S1301 D25.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 15:12 03/06/2013 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: —*TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION MODEL* -- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 25.00 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 18.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *DATA BANK RAINFALL USED* *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) II ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER -DEFINED STREET -SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSS FALL: CURB GUTTER -GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- /OUT -/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE/SIDE/WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) --- ------------------------------- ------ ----- =----- ----- ------- 1 30.0 20.0 0.018/0.018/0.020 0.67 2.00 0.0313 0.167 0.0150 GLOBAL STREET FLOW -DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow -Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top -of -Curb) 2. (Depth)* (Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 150.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< >>USE TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< Page 1 SB01 D25.RES INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 130.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 9.91 DOWNSTREAM (FEET) = 8.95 Tc = K*[(LENGTH*# 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 6.060 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 4.326 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) APARTMENTS A 0.24 0.40 0.200 32 6.06 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.200 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.91 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.24 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.91 *######*################*######*################*#######################*### FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 250.00 IS CODE = 21 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< >>USE TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ----------------------------------------------------------------- INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 200.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 9.90 DOWNSTREAM (FEET) = 8.90 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 7.783 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.755 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) APARTMENTS A 0.70 0.40 0.200 32 7.78 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.200 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.33 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.70 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.33 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 300.00 TO NODE 350.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< >>USE TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- -------------------------------------------- INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 45.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 10.00 DOWNSTREAM (FEET) = 9.45 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 4.824 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) APARTMENTS A 0.25 0.40 0.200 32 5.00 Page 2 SB01D25.RES SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.200 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.09 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.25 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.09 END OF STUDY SUMMARY TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.3 TC(MIN.) = 5.00 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.25 AREA -AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.08 AREA -AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA -AVERAGED Ap = 0.200 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.09 END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS Page 3 SB01D100.RES RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright 1983-2010 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 17.0 Release Date: 07/01/2010 License ID 1580 Analysis prepared by: C&V Consulting DESCRIPTION OF STUDY * VIA LIDO * DEVELOPED CONDITION * 100 YEAR STORM FILE NAME: SB01 D100.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 15:15 03/06/2013 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: —*TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION MODEL* -- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 100.00 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 18.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *DATA BANK RAINFALL USED* *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) II ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER -DEFINED STREET -SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSS FALL: CURB GUTTER -GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- /OUT -/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE/SIDE/WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) --- ------------------------------- ------ ----- =----- ----- ------- 1 30.0 20.0 0.018/0.018/0.020 0.67 2.00 0.0313 0.167 0.0150 GLOBAL STREET FLOW -DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow -Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top -of -Curb) 2. (Depth)* (Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 150.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< >>USE TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< Page 1 SBOIDIOO.RES INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 130.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 9.91 DOWNSTREAM (FEET) = 8.95 Tc = K*[(LENGTH*# 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 6.060 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 5.542 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) APARTMENTS A 0.24 0.40 0.200 32 6.06 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.200 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.17 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.24 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.17 *######*################*######*#########*######*#######################*### FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 250.00 IS CODE = 21 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< >>USE TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ----------------------------------------------------------------- INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 200.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 9.90 DOWNSTREAM (FEET) = 8.90 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 7.783 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 4.801 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) APARTMENTS A 0.70 0.40 0.200 32 7.78 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.200 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.99 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.70 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.99 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 300.00 TO NODE 350.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< >>USE TIME -OF -CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- -------------------------------------------- INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 45.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 10.00 DOWNSTREAM (FEET) = 9.45 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 6.187 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) APARTMENTS A 0.25 0.40 0.200 32 5.00 Page 2 SBO D1 OO.RES SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.200 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.40 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.25 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.40 END OF STUDY SUMMARY TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.3 TC(MIN.) = 5.00 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.25 AREA -AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.08 AREA -AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA -AVERAGED Ap = 0.200 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.40 END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS Page 3 Hydrology Report Via Lido -Newport Beach CA VI. HYDROLOGY MAP -EXISTING AND DEVELOPED CONDITIONS Prepared by C&V Consulting Wil_ v lei 8 I I T = 0.03 AC. (37) IMPERMOUS AREA X1 Z II O ACREAGE ■ ■ // = 3.05 SUB -AREA BOUNDARY o+°i FLOW PATH 101 a I = 5.96 CFS I I I L T I I I I / T I + � I I I I + I ° I 1 I I I I I T 1 I I I II + I I I +i I 1 I T 1 � � I I � o Wil_ v lei 8 I I T = 0.03 AC. (37) IMPERMOUS AREA X1 Z II 0.30 AC ACREAGE ■ ■ // = 3.05 SUB -AREA BOUNDARY — — — � HYDROLOGY MAP UNDEVELOPED CONDITIONS � TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 17555 — — — — — — — — — — — — — VIA MALAGA + �L_ e smn >.,u Awa gva aP.m CD CD ` 4 SITE f O IN THOMAS BROTHERS GUIDE PAGE 888 GRID H7 VICINITY MAP N. T. S. LEGEND: = 0.03 AC. (37) IMPERMOUS AREA X1 Z SUB -AREA NUMBER 0.30 AC ACREAGE ■ ■ MAJOR -AREA BOUNDARY = 3.05 SUB -AREA BOUNDARY — — — FLOW PATH 101 NODE ,Z a 1110,210"T11111 PERMaJS AREA = 0.03 AC. (37) IMPERMOUS AREA = 1.17 AC. (977) Qs 2" = 2.16 CFS Qom 2" = 3.05 CFS Q�m = 4.64 CFS 010MR-M = 5.96 CFS SCALE: 1" = 10' 0 05 10 20 E I I I II I I I I I 2 0 1 T Eq T \ e N.A.P.-0000 \ \\ ---+ ----i - - - - - - - �J h VIA MALAGA E + 1 F T r 4- i HYDROLOGY MAP DEVELOPED CONDITIONS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 17555 2 yaq Pk'�' Cnnl MOnwar � P �SITE THOMAS BROTHERS GUIDE PAGE 888 GRID H7 VICINITYMAP N.T.S. POST DEVELOPMENT PERVIOUS AREA = 0.13 AC. (117) IMPERVIOUS AREA = 1.06 AC. (897) QZ1 2" = 1.98 CFS Qs 2- = 2.83 CFS Qasn s.a = 4.33 CFS Q,ma zax = 5.56 CFS LEGEND: SCALE: 1" = 20' 0 10 20 40 X1 Z SUB—AREA NUMBER 0.30 AC ACREAGE MAJOR—AREA BOUNDARY SUB—AREA BOUNDARY FLOW PATH 101 NODE SCALE: 1" = 20' 0 10 20 40 Water Quality Management Plan (Conceptual Priority WQMP) Project Name: 3303 & 3355 Via Lido Prepared for: Shubin + Donaldson Architects, Inc. Contact: Sieglinde Pukke 403 E. Montecito Street #2A Santa Barbara, CA 93101 (805)682-7000 Prepared by: C&V Consulting, Inc. Engineer: Dane P. McDougall Registration No.: 80705 27156 Burbank Foothill Ranch, CA 92610 (949)916-3800 February 2013 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3303-3355 Via Lido Contents Page No. Section I Discretionary Permit(s) and Water Quality Conditions ..................................... 3 SectionII Project Description.......................................................................................... 4 SectionIII Site Description.............................................................................................. 7 Section IV Best Management Practices (BMPs)............................................................. 10 Section V Inspection/ Maintenance Responsibility for BMPs.......................................... 22 SectionVI Site Plan and Drainage Plan.......................................................................... 24 Section VII Educational Materials.................................................................................. 25 Attachments AttachmentA................................................................................... Educational Materials Attachment B......................................................................... BMP Exhibit & Grading Plan Attachment C .................................................... Worksheets From County of Orange TGD Attachment D ............................ Reference Exhibits/ Figures from County of Orange TGD Attachment E............................................................................ BMP Fact Sheets & Details Attachment F.....................................................Notice of Transfer of Responsibility Form AttachmentG.................................................................................................. Soils Report SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Owner's Certification Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3303-3355 Via Lido Section I Discretionary Permit(s) and Water Quality Conditions SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGUNDE PUKKE Section I SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 3 Project Infomation Permit/Application No. Tract/Parcel Map No. Additional Information/ Coastal Development Permits - approval TBD Comments: Water Quality Conditions Water Quality No formal conditions of approval have been issued at this time. Conditions (list verbatim) Watershed -Based Plan Conditions Provide applicable Infiltration and Hydromodification Management Plan conditions from watershed - ,Watershed (WIHMP) for the Newport Bay -Newport Coast area has not been based plans including approved at this time. WIHMPs and TMDLS. SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGUNDE PUKKE Section I SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 3 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3303-3355 Via Lido Section II Project Description IIA Project Description Description of Proposed Project New development projects that create 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface. This category includes commercial, industrial, Development Category = residential housing subdivisions, mixed-use, and public projects on (Verbatim from WQMP): _ private or public property that falls under the planning and building authority or the Permittees. The WQMP development category is - "Priority'. Project Area (ftz): 50,099 Number of Dwelling Units: 24 SIC Code: 236116 SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section III SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 4 The project site consists of approximately 1.196 acres located at 3303 Via Lido and 3355 Via Lido in the City of Newport Beach. The project site is Narrative Project = currently developed with an existing office building, a church building, Description: = and a parking lot that will require demolition. Site improvements are to ' include construction of 24 new townhomes with landscaping and on site parking and on site guest parking. Pervious Impervious Project Area -----------------------------------------------------------' ------------------------------------------------------ = Area = = Area = Percentage = _ Percentage (acres / sq ft) _ = (acres / sq ft) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pre -Project Conditions -- =--------------- --- 0 0 1.196 / 52,099 100% --------------- -----------------------------=-----------------------------------------------------------=-------------------------------=----------------------...... Post -Project Conditions = 0.132/5,756 11% = 1.064/46,343 = 89% ---------------------------------- =--------=---------------------------------------------------------........................... Underground storm drain facilities do not exist adjacent to the site. Storm water runoff presently surface flows off the site to the adjacent Drainage public streets (Via Lido, Via Oporto and Via Malaga) where they are Patterns/ Connections = collecting in surface gutters and conveyed to the north. From there flows are collecting in an off-site catch basin where they empty into the adjacent Newport Bay. SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section III SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 4 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3303-3355 Via Lido II.2 Potential Stormwater Pollutants SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section III SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 5 Pollutants of Concern Circle One: E=Expected to Pollutant be of concern Additional Information and Comments N=Not Expected to be of concern Suspended -Solid/ Sediment E Nutrients i E N Heavy Metals E N Pathogens (Bacteria/Virus) E N i I Pesticides i E N Oil and Grease E N Toxic Organic Compounds E N I Trash and Debris E N j i SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section III SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 5 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3303-3355 Via Lido II.3 Hydrologic Conditions of Concern ® No - See map (Figure XVI -3d in Attachment D) ❑ Yes - Describe applicable hydrologic conditions of concern below. Refer to Section 2.2.3 in the TGD. II.4 Post Development Drainage Characteristics Describe post development drainage characteristics. Refer to Section 2.2.4 in the TGD. Existing land use consists of multiple structures and a parking lot. The existing property is considered to be nearly all impervious. The proposed development will improve this situation by providing some landscaped features in common areas and the front of the proposed homes. Overall peak flows from the property are anticipated to be less than or equal to pre development flows. In landscaped areas, the use of area drain inlets will be employed to reduce storm water from transporting sediments over flatwork improvements. Area drains will curb core to adjacent public streets per public standards. II.5 Property Ownership/ Management Describe property ownership/ management. Refer to Section 2.2.5 in the TGD. Parcel A of the project site (APN 423-112-02) located at 3303 Via Lido is owned by First Church of Christ, Scientist as to Parcel A. Parcel B of the project site (APN 423-112-03) located at 3355 Via Lido is own by Newport Beach Townhouse LLP, A Nevada Limited Liability Partnership. A homeowners association will be formed to be responsible for the long term maintenance of the project's stormwater facilities. SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section III SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 6 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3303-3355 Via Lido Section III Site Description IIIA Physical Setting Planning Area/ Community Name Lido Village Location/Address 3303 & 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA APN: 423-112-02 4 PI (Private Institution) Land Use APN: 423-112-03 4 Commercial Zoning RM -20 Acreage 1.196 Predominant Soil Type Soil Type D III.2 Site Characteristics Precipitation Zone 0.67" per Orange County Rainfall Zones Map, Figure XVI.1 of the Technical Guidance Document The topography of the site slopes gently in a northwest direction, at a TopographyI rate of no more than a third of a percent, with elevations above sea level from 10 feet at the southerly portion of the project site and 7 feet throughout the remainder of the project site. Underground storm drain facilities do not exist adjacent to the site. Storm water runoff presently surface flows off the site to the adjacent Drainage public streets (Via Lido, Via Oporto and Via Malaga) where they are Patterns/ Connections collecting in surface gutters and conveyed to the north. From there flows are collecting in an off-site catch basin where they empty into the adjacent Newport Bay. SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section III SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 7 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3303-3355 Via Lido Site Characteristics (continued) Per the Geotechnical Engineering Services Report, prepared by Professional Service Industries, hic. dated August 24, 2012, the following soil conditions were encountered: "As indicated on our boring logs, the existing pavement section generally consists of approximately 3 inches of asphalt underlain by a Soil Type, Geology, and silty sand with gravel (apparent base course) that was estimated to be Infiltration Properties about 6 inches thick. The pavement section was underlain by native soil consisting of medium dense silty gravely sand with trace organics that extend to a depth of approximately 5 -feet below existing grade, very soft to soft clayey silt that extends to a depth of approximately 71/2 -feet below existing grade, and loose to very dense slightly silty sand to the maximum depth explored of approximately 50 -feet below the existing ground surface elevation." Per the Geotechnical Engineering Services Report, prepared by Professional Service Industries, Inc. dated August 24, 2012: Hydrogeologic (Groundwater) Conditions Geotechnical Conditions (relevant to infiltration) "Groundwater was measured at approximately 5 -feet below existing grade in all four borings at the time of drilling. Based on a review of the California Geological Survey (CGS) Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Newport Quadrangle, the historic high groundwater depth for the site area is noted to be about 5 feet below grade. It is possible that seasonal variations (temperature, rainfall, tide conditions etc) will cause fluctuations in the groundwater level. Additionally, perched water may be encountered in discontinuous zones within the overburden. The groundwater levels presented in this report are the levels that were measured at the time of our field activities. It is recommended that the contractor determine the actual groundwater levels at the site at the time of the construction activities to determine the impact, if any, on the construction procedures." Per the Geotechnical Engineering Services Report, prepared by Professional Service Industries, Inc. dated August 24, 2012, the following information was provided in regards to infiltration: "Note that the upper soils are sensitive to disturbances caused by construction traffic and to changes in moisture content. During wet weather periods, increases in the moisture content of the soil can cause significant reduction in the soil strength and support capabilities. Furthermore, perched groundwater conditions can develop during periods of heavv rainfall as a result of less permeab SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section III SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 8 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3303-3355 Via Lido Off -Site Drainage Utility and Infrastructure Information layers impeding infiltration. In these instances, overlying subgrade soils may become unstable and require remedial measures. It will, therefore, be advantageous to perform earthwork and foundation construction activities during dry weather." No off-site drainage was accounted for within this report. No underground storm drain exists directly adjacent to the site. The proposed development is designed to convey storm water flows through surface drainage to adjacent public streets or by collection into small area drain systems on-site which curb core to the adjacent public streets. There is a proposed water feature/fountain near the corner of Via Lido and Via Malaga. There is a common open space with enhanced paving, seating, and landscape area located at the northern section of the project site, between Units 4-5, between Units 9-10, near Unit 11 at the southeast corner of the project site with total of approximately 2,380 square feet of open space. III.3 Watershed Description Receiving Waters Lower Newport Bay 303(d) Listed Impairments ------------- _ Chlordane, Copper, DDT, Indicator Bacteria, Nutrients, PCBs Pesticides, Sediment Toxicity Applicable TMDLs Copper, Indicator Bacteria, Nutrients, Pesticides, Turbidity/Siltation Pollutants of Concern for Copper, Indicator Bacteria, Nutrients, Pesticides, Suspended Soils, the Project Heavy Metals, Pathogens, Oil and Grease, Toxic Organic Compounds, Trash and Debris Environmentally Sensitive and Special Biological Lower Newport Bay Significant Areas SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section III SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 9 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3303-3355 Via Lido Section IV Best Management Practices (BMPs) IV. 1 Project Performance Criteria (NOC Permit Area only) Is there an approved WIHMP or equivalent for the project area that includes more stringent LID feasibility criteria or if there are opportunities identified for implementing LID on regional or sub -regional basis? YES ❑ NO If yes, describe WIHMP feasibility criteria or regional/sub-regional LID opportunities. SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section IV SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 10 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3303-3355 Via Lido Project Performance Criteria (continued) If HCOC exists, list applicable hydromodification "- control For the purpose of the proposed project, HCOCs do not exist since the performance existing condition of the site is 100% impervious. criteria (Section 7.II-2.4.2.2 in MWQMP) List applicable LID _ Per 7.II-2.4.2.3 of the Model WQMP, the available LID Treatment BMPs to be performance criteria (Section utilized in reducing the post -development impacts include shallow infiltration, harvest and use, evapotranspiration, or biotreat/biofilter, of the 7.II-2.4.3 from MWQMP) 85th percentile of a 24-hour storm event. (Simple Method) Calculate LID DCVEx = (0.75 x 1+ 0.15) x 0.67 x 1.196 AC x 43560 sf/ac x (1/12) in/ft design storm =2,620 cf capture volume DCVPaoP = (0.75 x 0.89 + 0.15) x 0.67 x 1.196 AC x 43560 sf/ac x (1/12) in/ft for Project. = 2,380 cf (Worksheet A & B - Reference Attachment C) SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section IV SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 11 Per 7.11-3.2.2 of the Model WQMP, if the LID performance criteria is not feasibly met by retention and/or biotreatment, then sizing of onsite treatment control BMPs are required. Sizing of these treatment control BMPs List applicable will include, if applicable, any Water Quality credits as calculated per the treatment control Technical Guidance Document. If the additional required volume cannot be BMP performance met, however has a medium to high effectiveness for reducing the primary criteria (Section POCs, the project is considered to be in compliance, then a waiver 7.II-3.2.2 from application and participation in an alternative program may be not required, MWQMP) If the cost of providing treatment control BMPs greatly outweighs the pollution control benefits, a waiver of treatment control and LID requirements can be requested. (Simple Method) Calculate LID DCVEx = (0.75 x 1+ 0.15) x 0.67 x 1.196 AC x 43560 sf/ac x (1/12) in/ft design storm =2,620 cf capture volume DCVPaoP = (0.75 x 0.89 + 0.15) x 0.67 x 1.196 AC x 43560 sf/ac x (1/12) in/ft for Project. = 2,380 cf (Worksheet A & B - Reference Attachment C) SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section IV SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 11 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3303-3355 Via Lido IV.2. SITE DESIGN AND DRAINAGE PLAN The proposed development is located on the Balboa Peninsula, in the City of Newport Beach. The Pacific Ocean is located about 2,000 feet to the west of the site, and the Newport Bay is located about 170 feet to the east of the site. The topography of the site slopes gently in a northwest direction, at a rate of no more than a third of a percent. Underground storm drain facilities do not exist adjacent to the site. Storm water runoff presently surface flows off the site to the adjacent public streets (Via Lido, Via Oporto and Via Malaga) where they are collecting in surface gutters and conveyed to the north. From there flows are collecting in an off-site catch basin where they empty into the adjacent Newport Bay. The property is designated in FEMA Flood Zone "X" shaded, areas considered to be outside of the mo -year floodplain, but inside the goo -year floodplain. Typical to the Balboa Peninsula area, groundwater was found at shallow depths (up to five feet from the surface). Existing land use consists of multiple structures and a parking lot. The existing property is considered to be nearly all impervious. The proposed development will improve this situation by providing some landscaped features in common areas and the front of the proposed homes. Overall peak flows from the property are anticipated to be less than or equal to pre development flows. In landscaped areas, the use of area drain inlets will be employed to reduce storm water from transporting sediments over flatwork improvements. Area drains will curb core to adjacent public streets per public standards. Water quality BMPs will be employed per City of Newport Beach Model WQMP requirements. Hydraulic Conditions of Concern are not anticipated because the proposed development will not be increasing overall storm water runoff volumes. Due to the historic groundwater levels, deep infiltration BMPs would not be a feasible on this site. However, considering the site layout, Hydrologic Source Control (HSC) BMPs were utilized to reduce the overall design capture volume. SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section IV SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 12 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3303-3355 Via Lido Drainage Management Areas (DMA) Table: Drainage Design Flow Area No. Area (ac) DCV (cf) Rate (cfs) Proposed BMPs (DMA) HSC -2 Impervious Dispersion A-1 0.173 318 0.017 HSC -3 Street Trees INF -6 Permeable Pavement HSC -2 Impervious Dispersion A -z 0.373 787 0.050 HSC -3 Street Trees INF -6 Permeable Pavement HSC -2 Impervious Dispersion A-3 0.321 614 0.034 HSC -3 Street Trees INF -6 Permeable Pavement HSC -2 Impervious Dispersion A-4 0.330 658 0.039 HSC -3 Street Trees INF -6 Permeable Pavement SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section IV SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 13 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3303-3355 Via Lido IV.3 LID BMP SELECTION AND PROJECT CONFORMANCE ANALYSIS IV.3.1 Hydrologic Source Controls Name Included? Localized on -lot infiltration ❑ Impervious area dispersion (e.g. roof top disconnection) Street trees (canopy interception) Residential rain barrels (not actively managed) ❑ Green roofs/Brown roofs ❑ Blue roofs ❑ Impervious area reduction (e.g. permeable pavers, site design) Impervious Area Dispersion: Impervious area dispersion refers to the practice of routing runoff from pervious areas, such as rooftops, walkways, and patios onto the surface of adjacent pervious areas. Runoff is dispersed uniformly via splash block and soaks into the ground as it moves slowly across the surface of pervious areas. Minor ponding may occur, but it is not the intent of this practice to actively promote on -lot storage or infiltration. Standing water is not allowed. Impervious Area Dispersion is ranked second in the preferred method of treatment. Street Trees: By intercepting rainfall, trees can provide several aesthetic and storm water benefits including peak flow control, increased infiltration and evapotranspiration, and runoff temperature reduction. The volume of precipitation intercepted by the canopy reduces the treatment volume required for downstream treatment BMPs. Shading reduces heat island effect as well as the temperature of adjacent impervious surfaces, over which storm water flows, and thus reduces the heat transferred to downstream receiving waters. Tree routes also strengthen the soil structure and provided infiltration pathways, simultaneously reducing erosion potential and enhancing infiltration. Street Trees are provided along the private street and near the guest parking areas. Street Trees are ranked third in the preferred method of treatment. Impervious Area Reduction: Impervious Area Reduction such as permeable concrete pavements contain small voids that allow water to pass through to a gravel base. They come in a variety of forms; they may be modular paving system (concrete pavers, grass -pave, or gravel -pave) or poured in place pavement (pourous concrete, permeable asphalt). All permeable pavements treat stormwater and remove sediments and metals to some degree within the pavement pore space and SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section IV SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 14 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3303-3355 Via Lido gravel base. While conventional pavement result in increased rates and volumes of surface runoff, properly constructed and maintained porous pavements, allow stormwater to percolate through the pavement and enter the soil below. This facilitates groundwater recharge while providing the structural and functional features needed for the roadway, parking lot, or sidewalk. The paving surface, subgrade and installation requirements of permeable pavements are more complex than those for conventional asphalt or concrete surfaces. For porous pavements to function properly over an expected life span of 15-20 years, they must be properly sited and carefully designed an installed, as well as periodically maintained. Failure to protect paved areas from construction - related sediment loads can result in their premature clogging and failure. IV.3.2 Infiltration BMPs Name Included? Bioretention without underdrains ❑ Rain gardens ❑ Porous landscaping ❑ Infiltration planters ❑ Retention swales ❑ Infiltration trenches ❑ Infiltration basins ❑ Drywells ❑ Subsurface infiltration galleries ❑ French drains ❑ Permeable asphalt ❑ Permeable concrete ❑ Permeable concrete pavers ❑ SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section IV SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 15 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3303-3355 Via Lido IV.3.3 Evapotranspiration, Rainwater Harvesting BMPs Name Included? All HSCs; See Section I V.33 ❑ Surface -based infiltration BMPs ❑ Biotreatment BMPs ❑ Above -ground cisterns and basins ❑ Underground detention ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ IV.3.4 Biotreatment BMPs Name Included? Bioretention with underdrains ❑ Stormwater planter boxes with underdrains ❑ Rain gardens with underdrains ❑ Constructed wetlands ❑ Vegetated swales ❑ Vegetated filter strips ❑ Proprietary vegetated biotreatment systems ❑ Wet extended detention basin ❑ Dry extended detention basins ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section IV SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 16 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3303-3355 Via Lido IV.3.5 Hydromodification Control BMPs Hydromodification Control BMPs BMP Name BMP Description N/A N/A IV.3.6 Regional/Sub-Regional LID BMPs II Regional/Sub-Regional LID BMPs 11 N/A IV.3.7 Treatment Control BMPs Treatment Control BMPs BMP Name BMP Description By diverting the roof top and hardscape runoff to yard areas for impervious Dispersion natural infiltration for volume reduction. Reference Worksheet A located in Attachment C. Provided street trees along the private roadway and parking Street Trees areas will reduce the volume of runoff from impervious areas by evapotranspiration and infiltration to the root system for volume reduction. Reference Worksheet A located in Attachment C. Permeable concrete pavers, planters and landscape areas will Impervious Area Reduction reduce the volume of runoff from impervious areas for volume reduction. Reference Worksheet A located in Attachment C. SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section IV SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 17 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3303-3355 Via Lido IV.3.8 Non-structural Source Control BMPs Fill out non-structural source control check box forms or provide a brief narrative explaining if non- structural source controls were not used. Non -Structural Source Control BMPs Check One If not applicable, state brief Included N Ot Identifier Name reason Applicable Ni Education for Property Owners, ❑ Tenants and Occupants ............ N2 .- - --- - - - Activity Restrictions .......®.............. o ..........- - - ----------------------------------------------------- N3 I ----- .. .............................. Common Area Landscape ® .................... ❑ -----._.._......_..-------------------- Management ................... N4 ..'--'-----'---'-----------------------'-----'----- BMP Maintenance ..................................... M ❑ --.---_.-......----'—'-'......_.-........... ................... N5 ----------------------- ------ --.......................................................... Title 22 CCR Compliance (How ® ❑ -_-..---............................. development will comply) ................... N6 -------------------------------------- —................................ Local Industrial Permit Compliance ❑ .................... M --....----.------ .---_....-------__.._.. Residential Project ................... N7 .------ .--- .------ ---------- -"--------------------- Spill Contingency Plan ..................................... ❑ -----------"----'----'-'----'-'----".----'- ............... N$--'...'--- ...................... --------------.......0.............. Underground Storage Tank ®....... ------..._.........-----'......— Compliance ............... N9Hazardous ----------------------------------------------- ------ Materials Disclosure .......®.................... ...... .------------------------ —-- Compliance ------------------- N10 ------------------------------------------------------ Uniform Fire Code Implementation ----------------- M ------------------ ❑ --------------------------------------------- .................. N11 Common Area Litter Control ------.®..............o ------. ------------------- N12 ------------------------------------------------------ Employee Training ------------------------------------- M ❑ --------------------------------------------- ------------------- N13 ------------------------------------------------------ Housekeeping of Loading Docks ------------------------------------- ❑ M --------------------------------------------- No proposed loading docks ................... N14 ........................................................................................... Common Area Catch Basin Inspection M ❑ ............................................. ------------------- N15 ------------------------------------------------------ Street Sweeping Private Streets and ------------------------------------- ® ❑ ------------------------------------------- Parking Lots Nl-6 ------------------------ ----- -........................................®............_._...... Retail Gasoline Outlets ------- Residential Project SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section IV SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 18 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3303-3355 Via Lido IV.3.9 Structural Source Control BMPs Structural Source Control BMPs Check One Identifier Name If not applicable, state brief Included Not reason Applicable Sl Provide storm drain system stenciling El® No proposed storm drain. and signage Design and construct outdoor material 1:1® No proposed outdoor storage S2 storage areas to reduce pollution introduction areas. Design and construct trash and waste S3 storage areas to reduce pollution ❑ introduction Use efficient irrigation systems & S4 landscape design, water conservation, ® ❑ smart controllers, and source control S5 Protect slopes and channels and El ® No proposed slopes provide energy dissipation Incorporate requirements applicable to individual priority project categories ® ❑ (from SDRWQCB NPDES Permit) S6 Dock areas ❑ ® No proposed docks. S7 Maintenance bays ❑ ® No proposed maintenance bays. SS Vehicle wash areas ❑ ® No proposed vehicle wash areas. S9 Outdoor processing areas El® No proposed outdoor processing areas. S10 Equipment wash areas E]® No proposed equipment wash areas. S11 Fueling areas ❑ ® No proposed fueling areas. S12 Hillside landscaping E] ® Project not located within hillside areas. S13 Wash water control for food ❑ ® No proposed food preparation preparation areas areas. S14 Community car wash racks E]® No proposed community car wash racks. SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section IV SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 19 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3303-3355 Via Lido IV.4 ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE PLAN (IF APPLICABLE) IV.4.1 Water Quality Credits Description of Proposed Project Project Types that Qualify for Water Quality Credits (Select all that apply): ❑Redevelopment [ ❑Brownfield redevelopment, meaning ? ® Higher density development projects which projects that reduce the redevelopment, expansion, or reuse of real include two distinct categories (credits can only overall impervious property which may be complicated by the E be taken for one category): those with more than footprint of the project ;presence or potential presence of hazardous seven units per acre of development (lower credit site. substances, pollutants or contaminants, and allowance); vertical density developments, for which have the potential to contribute to example, those with a Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) adverse ground or surface WQ if not of 2 or those having more than 18 units per acre redeveloped. (greater credit allowance). ❑ Mixed use development, such as a ❑ Transit -oriented developments, such as a mixed ❑ Redevelopment combination of residential, commercial, ;use residential or commercial area designed to projects in an established industrial, office, institutional, or other land f maximize access to public transportation; similar to historic district, historic uses which incorporate design principles ' above criterion, but where the development center is preservation area, or that can demonstrate environmental benefits E within one half mile of a mass transit center (e.g. bus, similar significant city that would not be realized through single E rail, light rail or commuter train station). Such area including core City use projects (e.g. reduced vehicle trip traffic projects would not be able to take credit for both Center areas (to be with the potential to reduce sources of water categories, but may have greater credit assigned i defined through or air pollution). mapping). ❑ _ ❑ Live -work developments, a ❑In -fill projects, the ❑Developments with Developments variety of developments designed conversion of empty lots dedication of undeveloped in historic to support residential and ] and other underused Developments portions to parks, :districts or in a city center vocational needs together - spaces into more 3 preservation areas and =historic =similar to criteria to mixed use beneficially used spaces, area. other pervious uses. preservation development; would not be able such as residential or areas. to take credit for both categories. commercial areas. Calculation of High Density = 5% Water Quality DCVPROP= 2,080 cf Credits i DCVWate,Cred,t= 2,080x 0.05 = 104 cf (if applicable) SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section IV SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 20 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3303-3355 Via Lido IV.4.2 Alternative Compliance Plan Information wa SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section IV SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 21 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3303-3355 Via Lido Section V Inspection/ Maintenance Responsibility for BMPs BMP Inspection/ Maintenance Inspection/ Minimum Reponsible Maintenance BMP Frequency of Party(s) Activities Activities Required WQMP to be a part of Education for As needed for Property Owners, HOA and individual Title Documents as property sales and part of purchase. HOA Tenants, & homeowners to give yearly report once a year for Occupants (N1) to residents. reporting to residents. CC&Rs provided at CC&Rs provided with time of sale and will property sales. Issue Activity Restrictions HOA identify activity letters of non - (N2) restrictions for compliance, as needed property and the by HOA. neighborhood. HOA or appointed Property management company to provide maintenance of Regular maintenance Common Area landscaping to meet once a week and Landscape HOA current water monthly inspections Management (N3) efficiency and keep to determine plants healthy and bio deficiencies. areas maintained with proper soil amendments. HOA or appointed Property Regular maintenance BMP Maintenance management once a week and (N4) HOA company to provide monthly inspections maintenance of to determine BMPs per the deficiencies. requirements of the SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section V SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 22 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3303-3355 Via Lido SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section V SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 23 WQMP. Bioswales must be maintained with proper soil amendments and densely populated with vegetation. HOA or appointed Property Management Common Area Litter Company to provide Regular maintenance Control (N11) HOA maintenance and to once a week. empty common area trash cans. HOA or appointed Street Sweeping Property Management Regular street Private Streets and HOA Company to provide sweeping once a Parking Lots (N15) maintenance of month. Private Streets. HOA or appointed Property Management Company to provide Regular maintenance Efficient Irrigation maintenance of once a week and Systems & Landscape HOA landscaping to meet monthly inspection to Design (S4) current water determine efficiency standards, deficiencies. and keep plants healthy. SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section V SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 23 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3303-3355 Via Lido Section VI Site Plan and Drainage Plan VI.1 SITE PLAN AND DRAINAGE PLAN Include a site plan and drainage plan sheet set containing the following minimum information: • Project location • Site boundary • Land uses and land covers, as applicable • Suitability/feasibility constraints • Structural BMP locations • Drainage delineations and flow information • Drainage connections • BMP details See Attachment B for BMP Exhibit VI.2 ELECTRONIC DATA SUBMITTAL The minimum requirement is to provide submittal of PDF exhibits in addition to hard copies. Format must not require specialized software to open. If the local jurisdiction requires specialized electronic document formats (CAD, GIS) to be submitted, this section will be used to describe the contents (e.g., layering, nomenclature, georeferencing, etc.) of these documents so that they may be interpreted efficiently and accurately. SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section VII SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 24 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3303-3355 Via Lido Section VII Educational Materials Education Materials Residential Material Check If Business Material Check If (http://www.ocwatersheds.com) Applicable (http://www.ocwatersheds.com) Applicable The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door ® Tips for the Automotive Industry ❑ Tips for Car Wash Fund-raisers ❑ Tips for Using Concrete and Mortar ❑ Tips for the Home Mechanic ® Tips for the Food Service Industry ❑ Homeowners Guide for Sustainable ® Proper Maintenance Practices for Your El Use Business Household Tips Check If Other Material Attached Proper Disposal of Household Hazardous Waste Recycle at Your Local Used Oil ® El Center (North County) Recycle at Your Local Used Oil ❑ ❑ Collection Center (Central County) Recycle at Your Local Used Oil El El Center (South County) Tips for Maintaining a Septic Tank El El Responsible Pest Control ® ❑ Sewer Spill ❑ ❑ Tips for the Home Improvement Projects ❑ ❑ Tips for Horse Care ❑ ❑ Tips for Landscaping and Gardening ® ❑ Tips for Pet Care ® ❑ Tips for Pool Maintenance ® ❑ Tips for Residential Pool, Landscape and ❑ El Drains Tips for Projects Using Paint ❑ SHUBIN + DONALDSON ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: SIEGLINDE PUKKE Section VII SHUB-001-WQMP_1 Page 25 ATTACHMENT A lean beaches L and healthy creeks, rivers, bays and ocean are important to Orange County. However, many common activities such as painting can lead to water pollution if you're not careful. Paint must be used, stored and disposed of properly to ensure that it does not enter the street, gutter or storm drain. Unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks and toilets), water in storm drains is not treated before entering our waterways. You would never dump paint into the ocean, so don't let it enter the storm drains. Follow these easy tips to help prevent water pollution. Help Prevent Ocean Pollution: Tips for Projects Using Paint c TheOOce� ,e: s at Your'Froin Door Paint can cause significant damage to our environment. Whether you hire a contractor or do it yourself, it is important to follow these simple tips when purchasing, using, cleaning, storing and disposing of paint. Purchasing Paint ■ Measure the room or object to be painted, then buy only the amount needed. ■ Whenever possible, use water-based paint since it usually does not require hazardous solvents such as paint thinner for cleanup. Painting ■ Use only one brush or roller per color of paint to reduce the amount of water needed for cleaning. ■ Place open paint containers or trays on a stable surface and in a position that is unlikely to spill. ■ Always use a tarp under the area or object being painted to collect paint drips and contain spills. Cleaning ■ Never clean brushes or rinse paint containers in the street, gutter or storm drain. ■ For oil-based products, use as much of the paint on the brushes as possible. Clean brushes with thinner. To reuse thinner, pour it through a fine filter (e.g. nylon, metal gauze or filter paper) to remove solids such as leftover traces of paint. ■ For water-based products, use as much of the paint on the brushes as possible, then rinse in the sink. ■ Collect all paint chips and dust. Chips and dust from marine paints or paints containing lead, mercury or tributyl tin are hazardous waste. Sweep up and dispose of at a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center (HHWCC). Storing Paint ■ Store paint in a dry location away from the elements. ■ Store leftover water-based paint, oil-based paint and solvents separately in original or clearly marked containers. ■ Avoid storing paint cans directly on cement floors. The bottom of the can will rust much faster on cement. ■ Place the lid on firmly and store the paint can upside- down to prevent air from entering. This will keep the paint usable longer. Oil-based paint is usable for up to 15 years. Water-based paint remains. usable for up to 10 years. Alternatives to Disposal ■ Use excess paint to apply another coat, for touch-ups, or to paint a closet, garage, basement or attic. ■ Give extra paint to friends or family. Extra paint can also be donated to a local theatre group, low-income housing program or school. ■ Take extra paint to an exchange program such as the "Stop & Swap" that allows you to drop off or pick up partially used home care products free of charge. "Stop & Swap" programs are available at most HHWCCs. ■ For HHWCC locations and hours, call (714) 834-6752 or visit www.oclandfills.com. Disposing of Paint ■ Never put wet paint in the trash. For mater -based paint: ■ If possible, brush the leftover paint on cardboard or newspaper. Otherwise, allow the paint to dry in the can with the lid off in a well -ventilated area protected from the elements, children and pets. Stirring the paint every few days will speed up the drying. ■ Large quantities of extra paint should betaken to a HHWCC. ■ Once dried, paint and painted surfaces maybe disposed of in the trash. When setting a dried paint can out for trash collection, leave the lid off so the collector will see that the paint has dried. For oil-based paint: ■ Oil-based paint is a household hazardous waste. All leftover paint should be taken to a HHWCC. Aerosol paint: ■ Dispose of aerosol paint cans at a HHWCC. Spills ■ Never hose down pavement or other impermeable surfaces where paint has spilled. ■ Clean up spills immediately by using an absorbent material such as cat litter. Cat litter used to clean water-based paint spills can be disposed of in the trash. When cleaning oil-based paint spills with cat litter, it most be taken to a HHWCC. ■ Immediately report spills that have entered the street, gutter or storm drain to the County's 24 -Hour Water Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline at (714) 567-6363 or visit www oewatersheds.com to fill out an incident reporting form. P R O l! C T Mkffl0n PREVENTION .t` The Pollution Solution Several residential activities can result in water pollution. Among these activities are car washing and hosing off driveways and sidewalks. Both activities can waste water and result in excess runoff. Water conservation methods described in this pamphlet can prevent considerable amounts of runoff and conserve water. By taking your car to a commercial car wash and by sweeping driveways and sidewalks, you can further prevent the transport of pollutants to Orange County waterways. Here are some of the common pollutants for which you can be part of the solution: Pesticides and Fertilizer • The same pesticides that are designed to be toxic to pests can have an equally lethal impact on our marine life. The same fertilizer that promotes plant growth in lawns and gardens can also create nuisance algae blooms, which rem from the water and when it decomoos Never use pesticides or fertilizer within 48 hours of an anticipated rainstorm. Use only as much as is directed on the label and keep it off driveways and sidewalks. Dirt and Sediment • Dirt or sediment can impede the flow of the stormwater and negatively impact stream habitat as it travels through waterways and deposits downstream. Pollutants can attach to sediment, which can then be transported through our waterways. • Protect dirt stockpiles by covering them with tarps or secure plastic sheets to prevent wind or rain from allowing dirt or sediment to enter the storm drain system. Metals • Metals and other toxins present in car wash water can harm important plankton, which forms the base of the aquatic food chain. • Take your car to a commercial car wash where the wash water is captured and treated at a local wastewater treatment plant. 11 KN Did you know that most of the pollution found in our waterways is not from a single source, but from a ' non - point" source meaning the accumulation of pollution from residents and businesses throughout the community Lj Pet Waste �I Pet waste carries bacteria through our watersheds and eventually will be washed out to the ocean. This can pose a health risk to miters and surfers. Pick up after your pets! Wcuf w • Trash and debris; er waterways by _ wind, littering and careless maintenance of trash - receptacles. Street sweeping collects some of this trash;"; AV' however, much of what isn't captured ends up in our storm drain system where it flows untreated out to the ocean. Don't litter and make sure trash containers are properly covered. It is far more expensive to clean up the litter and trash that ends up in our waterways than it is to prevent it in the first place. Come out to one of Orange County's many locations for Coastal and Inner -Coastal Cleanup Day, which is held in September. Motor Oil /Vehicle Fluids • Oil and petroleum products from our vehicles are toxic to people, wildlife and plants. Fix any leaks from yo keep th up on your car. ' absorbent material as cat litter on oil spills, then sweep it up and dispose of it in the trash! Recycle used motor oil at a local Household Hazardous Waste Center. AN D �• ��. •�OIL � 1.6 The oown Begins at Ywr Froth Door '}e^ _. .e.+.rrm� i f•f...•M tM.MVtu iiru P!!M_Z=. ft's easy to Rrot r wK*l 21's Ff po°IuLor. Chu here to :ea.n h... .1 b Homeowners Guide for Sustainable Water Use Low Impact Development, Water Conservation & Pollution Prevention M The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door . . o I.` WATER Jv�)S DISTRICT ...... DRAN�E RUf10FF, RAinwATER AnD REUSE Where Does Water Runoff Go? Stormwater, or water from rainfall events, and runoff from outdoor water use such as sprinklers and hoses flows from homes directly into catch basins and the storm drain system. After entering the storm drain, the water flows untreated into streams, rivers, bays and ultimately the Pacific Ocean. Runoff can come from lawns, gardens, driveways, sidewalks and roofs. As it flows over hard, impervious surfaces, it picks up pollutants. Some pollutants carried by the water runoff include trash, pet waste, pesticides, fertilizer, motor oil and more. Water Conservation Pollution not only impairs the water quality for habitat and recreation, it can also reduce the water available for reuse. Runoff allowed to soak into the ground is cleaned as it percolates through the soil, replenishing depleted groundwater supplies. Groundwater provides approximately 50% of the total water for drinking and other indoor household activities in north and central Orange County. When land is covered with roads, parking lots, homes, etc., there is less land to take in the water and more hard surfaces over which the water can flow. In Orange County, 60-70% of water used by residents and businesses goes to irrigation and other outdoor uses. Reusing rainwater to irrigate our lawn not only reduces the impact of water pollution from runoff, but it also is a great way to conserve our precious water resources and replenish our groundwater basin. What is Low Impact Development (LID)? Low Impact Development (LID) is a method of development that seeks to maintain the natural hydrologic character of an area. LID provides a more sustainable and pollution -preventative approach to water management. New water quality regulations require implementation of LID in larger new developments and encourage implementation of LID and other sustainable practices in existing residential areas:`' Implementing modifications to your lawn or garden can reduce pollution in our environment, conserve water and reduce your water bill. Permeable. pavement allows water runoff to infiltrate through the soil and prevents most pollutants from 41 reaching the storm drain system. OPTIonS FOR RAinWATER HRRVESTinG Am REUSE 1A Rainwater harvesting is a great way to save money, prevent pollution and reduce potable water use. To harvest your rainwater, simply redirect the runoff from roofs and downspouts to rain barrels. Rain gardens are another option; these reduce runoff as well as encourage infiltration. Downspout Disconnection/Redirection Disconnecting downspouts from pipes running to the gutter prevents runoff from transporting pollutants to the storm drain. Once disconnected, downspouts can be redirected to rain gardens or other vegetated areas, or be connected to a rain barrel. Rain Barrels —t1 Rain barrels capture rainwater flow from roofs for reuse in saner landscape irrigation. Capacity of rain barrels needed for your home will depend on the amount of roof area and rainfall received. sp1$°t When purchasing your rain barrel, make sure it includes a screen, a 1 13 spigot to siphon water for use, an overflow tube to allow for excess water to run out and a connector if you wish to connect multiple barrels to add capacity of water storage. Mosquito growth prevention is very important when installing a rain barrel. The best way to prevent mosquito breeding is to eliminate entry points by ensuring all openings are sealed tightly. If these methods are unsuccessful, products are available to kill mosquito larvae, but that are harmless to animals and humans. Regular application of these products is essential. Please visit the Orange County Vector Control website for more information at www.ocvcd.org/mosquitoes3.php. Rain Gardens Rain gardens allow runoff to be directed from your roof downspout into a landscaped area. Vegetation and rocks in the garden will slow the flow of water to allow for infiltration into the soil. Plants and soil particles will absorb pollutants from the roof runoff. By utilizing a native plant palate, rain gardens can be maintained all year with minimal additional irrigation. These plants are adapted to the semi -arid climate of Southern California, require less water and can reduce your water bill. Before modifying your yard to install a rain garden, please consult your local building and/or planning departments to ensure your garden plan follows pertinent building codes and ordinances. Besides codes and ordinances, some home owner associations also have guidelines for yard modifications. If your property is in hill areas or includes engineered slopes, please seek professional advice before proceeding — with changes. For information on how to disconnect a downspout or to install and maintain a rain barrel or rain garden at your home, please see the Los Angeles Rainwater Harvesting Program, A Homeowner's "How -To" Guide, November 2009 at www.larainwaterharvesting.org/ OTHER WATER COnSERVATIon AnD POLLUTIon PREVEnTI0f1 TECHnioUES Native Vegetation and Maintenance "California Friendly" plants or native vegetation can significantly reduce water use. These plants often require far less fertilizers and pesticides, which are two significant pollutants found in Orange County waterways. Replacing water "thirsty' plants and grass types with water efficient natives is a great way to save water and reduce the need for potentially harmful pesticides and fertilizer. Please see the California Friendly Garden Guide produced by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and associated Southern California Water Agencies for a catalog of California friendly plants and other garden resources at www.bewaterwise.com/Gardensoft. Weed Free Yards Weeds are water thieves. They often reproduce quickly and rob your yard of both water and nutrients. Weed your yard by hand if possible. If you use herbicides to control the weeds, use only the amount recommended on the label and never use it if rain is forecast within the next U-11TIM0 Soil Amendments Soil amendments such as green waste (e.g. grass clippings, compost, etc.) can be a significant source of nutrients and can help keep the soil near the roots of plants moist. However, they can cause algal booms if they get into our waterways, which reduces the amount of oxygen in the water and impacts most aquatic organisms. It is important to apply soil amendments more than 48 hours prior to predicted rainfall. IRRIGATE EFFICIEnTLY Set a timer for your sprinklers Water at Sunrise Water by hand Fix leaks _247 Do your part to prevent water pollution in our 1 creeks, rivers, bays and ocean. Clean beaches and healthy creeks, rivers, bays and ocean are important to Orange County. However, not properly disposing of household hazardous waste can lead to water pollution. Batteries, electronics, paint, oil, gardening chemicals, cleaners and other hazardous materials cannot be thrown in the trash. They also must never be poured or thrown into yards, sidewalks, driveways, gutters or streets. Rain or other water could wash the materials into the storm drain and eventually into NEVER DISPOSE ourwaterways OFHOUSEHOLD and the ocean. HAZARDOUS In addition, hazardous WASTE IN THE waste must not TRASH, STREET, be poured in the sanitary GUTTER, sewers (sinks STORM DRAIN and toilets). OR SEWER. T Help Prevent Ocean Pollution: Proper Disposal of Household dous Waste ORANGE COUNTY Leftover household products that contain corrosive, toxic, ignitable, or reactive ingredients are considered to be "household hazardous waste" or "HHW." HHW can be found throughoutyour home, including the bathroom, kitchen, laundry room and garage. Disposal of HHW down the drain, on the ground, into storm drains, or in the trash is illegal and unsafe. Proper disposal of HHW is actually easy. Simply drop them off at a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center (HHWCC) for free disposal and recycling. Many materials including anti -freeze, latex - based paint, motor oil and batteries can be recycled. Some centers have a "Stop & Swap" program that lets you take partially used home, garden, and automobile products free of charge. There are four HHWCCs in Orange County: Anaheim: .................. 1071 N. Blue Gum St Huntington Beach: ......... 17121 Nichols St Irvine: ............................ 6411 Oak Canyon San Juan Capistrano:... 32250 La Pata Ave Centers are open Tuesday -Saturday, 9 a.m.- 3 p.m. Centers are closed on rainy days and major holidays. For more information, call (714) 834-6752 or visit www.oclandfills.com. Common household hazardous wastes ■ Batteries ■ Paint and paint products ■ Adhesives ■ Drain openers ■ Household cleaning products ■ Wood and metal cleaners and polishes ■ Pesticides ■ Fungicides/wood preservatives ■ Automotive products (antifreeze, motor oil, fluids) ■ Grease and rust solvents ■ Fluorescent lamps ■ Mercury (thermometers & thermostats) ■ All forms of electronic waste including computers and microwaves ■ Pool & spa chemicals ■ Cleaners ■ Medications ■ Propane (camping & BBQ) ■ Mercury -containing lamps ■ Television & monitors (CRTs, flatscreens) Tips for household hazardous waste ■ Never dispose of HHW in the trash, street, gutter, storm drain or sewer. ■ Keep these materials in closed, labeled containers and store materials indoors or under a cover. ■ When possible, use non -hazardous products. ■ Reuse products whenever possible or share with family and friends. ■ Purchase only as much of a product as you'll need. Empty containers may be disposed of in the trash. ■ HHW can be harmful to humans, pets and the environment. Report emergencies to 911. Preventing water Pollution at your commercial/industrial site Clean beaches and healthy creeks, rivers, bays and ocean are important to Orange County. However, many landscape and building maintenance activities can lead to water pollution if you're not careful. Paint, chemicals, plant clippings and other materials can be blown or washed into storm drains that flow to the ocean. Unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks and toilets), water in storm drains is not treated before entering our waterways. You would never pour soap or fertilizers into the ocean, so why would you let them enter the storm drains? Follow these easy tips to help prevent water pollution. Some types of industrial facilities are required to obtain coverage under the State General Industrial Permit. For more information visit: www.swrcb.ca.gov/stormwater/industrial.htnd For more information, please call the Orange County Stormwater Program at 1 -877 -89 -SPILL (1-877-897-7455) or visit www.ocwatersheds.com To report a spill, call the Orange County 24 -Hour Water Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline at 1 -877 -89 -SPILL (1-877-897-7455). For emergencies, dial 911. RECYCLE USED OIL Printed on Recycled Paper Pr d ii i The Ocean B at Your Front P R %SSO55 J E C T Po)}"I10V1 P R E V E N T I O N Ingle Landscape Maintenance ■ Compost grass clippings, leaves, sticks and other vegetation, or dispose of it at a permitted landfill or in green waste containers. Do not dispose of these materials in the street, gutter or storm drain. ■ Irrigate slowly and inspect the system for leaks, overspraying and runoff. Adjust automatic timers to avoid overwatering. ■ Follow label directions for the use and disposal of fertilizers and pesticides. ■ Do not apply pesticides or fertilizers if rain is expected within 48 hours or if wind speeds are above 5 mph. ■ Do not spray pesticides within 100 feet of waterways. ■ Fertilizers should be worked into the soil rather than dumped onto the surface. ■ If fertilizer is spilled on the pavement or sidewalk, sweep it up immediately and place it back in the container. Building Maintenance ■ Never allow washwater, sweepings or sediment to enter the storm drain. ■ Sweep up dry spills and use cat litter, towels or similar materials to absorb wet spills. Dispose of it in the trash. ■ If you wash your building, sidewalk or parking lot, you must contain the water. Use a shop vac to collect the water and contact your city or sanitation agency for proper disposal information. Do not let water enter the street, gutter or storm drain. ■ Use drop cloths underneath outdoor painting, scraping, and sandblasting work, and properly dispose of materials in the trash. ■ Use a ground cloth or oversized tub for mixing paint and cleaning tools. ■ Use a damp mop or broom to clean floors. ■ Cover dumpsters to keep insects, animals, rainwater and sand from entering. Keep the area around the dumpster clear of trash and debris. Do not overfill the dumpster. ■ Call your trash hauler to replace leaking dumpsters. ■ Do not dump any toxic substance or liquid waste on the pavement, the ground, or near a storm drain. Even materials that seem harmless such as latex paint or biodegradable cleaners can damage the environment. ■ Recycle paints, solvents and other materials. For more information about recycling and collection centers, visit www.oclandfiUs.com. ■ Store materials indoors or under cover and away from storm drains. ■ Use a construction and demolition recycling company to recycle lumber, paper, cardboard, metals, masonry, carpet, plastic, pipes, drywall, rocks, dirt, and green waste. For a listing of construction and demolition recycling locations in your area, visit www.ciwmb.ca.gov/recycle. ■ Properly label materials. Familiarize employees with Material PPS Safety Data Sheets. POBLJ-10" P R f V Ni I ON t� "ROTE TIN lie if d f1Tt Before Buying Pest Control Products • Identify the pest. • Decide if pest control products are the best control measure or if there are alternatives available. • Are integrated pest management guidelines available for this pest? • Read the product label: Is the pest I fisted on the label? Is it the best product for the pest? Before Mixing Your Sprayer 10 • Readthelabel carefully. • Buy only enough pesticide to treat the area affected by the pest. •'•#. • Check the weather and don't apply if it's windy or about to rain • Measure the area you're treating. • Calculate how much spray to mix. • Wear long sleeve shirt, long pants, shoes and any other protective equipment listed on the label and followall the label precautions. Be prepared for spills and know how to clean them up. When You're Ready To Spray • Mix and load spray in an area where any still led pesticide wil l not be able to drain or be washed away into storm drains, ditches, streams, ponds or other bodies of water. • Mix sprayer on grass, not the sidewalk or driveway. • Mix only as much as needed. When You're Spraying • AVOID spraying in or near storm drains, ditches, streams, and ponds! • Leave an untreated strip around these areas to protect the water. When You're done • Never dump leftovers down any drain; Save for a future application. • Triple -rinse sprayer and apply rinsewater to treated area. • Take any old or unwanted pesticides to a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center (714) 834-6752. Dsinq ?csI CunIrol Yroduds. It's Yaw 'He syansibdyTo Do [t Right! It Don't kawa pat food 1S"awWkktztasawaf sie.4sid.arartta 1 Fix k ky facets end @limbanifflit iha MP4 of -OW house. iunce it con DPW pasts. te anne4esic rit utther sum j lnftltr*.slphanwolvesh i �'j j �fMeatminldt nts. .i rte, ill 13 Dorf. am={au 0 Dw't cor tits — W owdrol pfodurts tatd tartar we can 6e washed colas [kan up dehth that rray and rote ways. hodw pests Rrra,a wear. or "irtg plants. With Integrated Pest Management (IPM), homeowners use common sense and nature to make it difficult for pests to survive. IPM techniques include cultural practices (such as mulching to prevent weeds), encouraging natural enemies (good bugs), andjudicious use of pest control products. First, identify your pest problem. To find the best solution, you need to pin down the problem. Consult gardening books, your county cooperative extension office or your local nursery. G&C, tfte phiptolen to canter m;:6. lllll!�hlfy raver garage cats. 11 loailhy aad waVed N Repn, all nrsdawJdoat surras pmts To o boat: T.td seal nsre tmdss at apeninps dof" dipnAt M inds. ilimt pet Decide how much pest control is necessary. If you can live with some pest damage, you can avoid intensive pest control product treatments. • Choose an effective option. Try various types of controls first: washing bugs off plants, pruning diseased parts of plants. If you need to use pest control products, choose one that targets the problem and poses the least hazard. Finally, it's easier to prevent pests than to control them. Think ahead This brochure is being distributed in order to reduce the impacts of pesticides on water quality. It was produced with support from the Orange County Storm Water Program, the Coalition for Urban/Rural C Environmental Stewardship (CURES) and a 319(h) grant from the . State Water Resources Control Board. Orange County Storm Water Program Participants Anaheim Public Works/Engineering ............................... (714) 765-5176 Brea Engineering............................................................. (714) 990-7666 Buena Park Public Works ................................................ (714) 562-3655 Costa Mesa Public Services ........................................... (714) 754-5248 Cypress Engineering........................................(714) (562) 431-3538 x301 229-6752 Dana Point Public Works ........................(949) 470-3095 248-3562 Fountain Valley Public Works ................................ (714) 593-4400 x347 Fullerton Engineering Dept ............................................. (714) 738-6853 Garden Grove Development Services ........................... (714) 741-5554 Huntington Beach Public Works ..................................... (714) 536-5432 Irvine Public Works........................................................... (949)724-6515 La Habra Public Services ................................................ (562) 905-9792 La Palma Public Works .......................................... (714) 523-1140 x102 Laguna Beach Municipal Services ................................. (949) 497-0711 Laguna Hills Engineering .................................................(949) Westminster Public Works Eng ............................. 707-2600 Laguna Niguel Public Works ........................................... (949) 362-4337 Lake Forest Public Works ............................................... (949) 461-3480 Los Alamitos Community Dev ............................... (562) 431-3538 x301 Mission Viejo Public Works ............................................. (949) 470-3095 Newport Beach Public works .......................................... (949) 644-3311 Orange Public Works ....................................................... (714) 744-5551 Placentia Engineering ......................................................(714) ............ (714) 834-6752 993-8131 San Clemente Engineering ............................................. (949) 361-6100 San Juan Capistrano Engineering .................................. (949) 493-1171 Santa Ana Public Works .................................................. (714) 647-3380 Seal Beach Engineering ........................................ (562) 431-2527 x318 Stanton Public Works ............................................. (714) 379-9222 x204 Tustin Public Works Engineering....................................(714) 573-3150 Villa Park Engineering..................................................... (714) 998-1500 Westminster Public Works Eng ............................. (714) 898-3311 x215 Yorba Linda Engineering ....................................... (714) 961-7170 x174 O.C. Storm Water Program ..................1 -877 -89 -SPILL (1-877-897-7455) 24 Hour Water Pollution Hotline ................................ (714) 567-6363 or ashbyk@pfrd.co.orange.ca. us Chemical and Hazardous Material Spill Emergencies ......................911 Other Important Phone Numbers: For Additional Brochures ......................1 -877 -89 -SPILL (1-877-897-7455) UC Masters & Coop Extension ....................................... (714) 708-1646 ucmastergardeners@yahoo.com O.C. Household Hazardous Waste Information ............ (714) 834-6752 or www.oc.ca.gov/IWMD Information on agriculture chemicals, pesticides and possible alternatives, O.C. Agriculture Commissioner ........... (714) 447-7115 Original graphics developed with support from: Coalition For Urban/Rural Environmental Stewardship (CURES) Western Crop Protection Association (WCPA) Responsible Industry for a Sound Environment (RISE) —12.0 1l ECTIN lean beaches and healthy creeks, rivers, bays and ocean are important to Orange County. However, many common activities such as pest control can lead to water pollution if you're not careful. Pesticide treatments must be planned and applied properly to ensure that pesticides do not enter the street, gutter or storm drain. Unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks and toilets), water in storm drains is not treated before entering our waterways. You world never dump, pesticides into the ocean, so don't let it enter the storm drains. Pesticides can cause significant damage to our environment if used improperly. If you are thinking of using a pesticide to control a pest, there are some important things to consider. Help Prevent Ocean Pollution: Responsible Pest Control TheOceanBe atYourFrontt Key Steps to Follow: St 1: Correctly identify the pest (insect, weed, rodent, or disease) and verify that it is actually causing the problem. This is important because beneficial insects are often mistaken for pests and sprayed with pesticides needlessly. Three life stages of the common lady Consult wnh a beetle, a beneficial insect. Certified Nursery Professional at a local nursery or garden center or send a sample of the pest to the Orange County Agricultural Commissioner's Office. Determine if the pest is still present — even though you see damage, the pest may have left. Step 2: Determine how many pests are present and causing damage. Small pest populations may be controlled more safely using non - pesticide techniques. These include removing food sources, washing off leaves with a strong stream of water, blocking entry into the home using caulking and replacing problem plants with ones less susceptible to pests. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) usually combines several least toxic pest control methods for long-term prevention and management of pest problems without harming you, your family, Uni'fr.o or the environment. La En,a ' . St 3: If a pesticide must be used, choose the least toxic chemical. Obtain information on the least toxic pesticides that are effective at controlling the target pest from the UC Statewide Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Program's Web site at www.ipm.ucdavis.edu. Seek out the assistance of a Certified Nursery Professional at a local nursery or garden center when selecting a pesticide. Purchase the smallest amount of pesticide available. Apply the pesticide to the pest during its most vulnerable life stage. This information can be found on the pesticide label. Step 4: Wear appropriate protective clothing. Follow pesticide labels regarding specific types of protective equipment you should wear. Protective clothing should always be washed separately from other clothing. St�! S: Continuously monitor external conditions when applying pesticides such as weather, irrigation, and the presence of children and animals. Never apply pesticides when rain is predicted within the next 48 hours. Also, do not water after applying pesticides unless the directions say it is necessary. Apply pesticides when the air is still; breezy conditions may cause the spray or dust to drift away from your targeted area. In case of an emergency call 911 and/or the regional poison control number at (714) 634-5988 or (800) 544-4404 (CA only). For general questions you may also visit www.calpoison.org. Step G: In the event of accidental spills, sweep up or use an absorbent agent to remove any excess pesticides. Avoid the use of water. Be prepared. Have a broom, dust pan, or dry absorbent material, such as cat litter, newspapers or paper towels, ready to assist in cleaning up spills. Contain and clean up the spill right away. Place contaminated materials in a doubled plastic bag. All materials used to clean up the spill should be properly disposed of according to your local Household Hazardous Waste Disposal site. S" % Properly store and dispose of unused pesticides. Purchase Ready -To - Use (RTU) products to avoid storing large concentrated quantities of pesticides. Store unused chemicals in a locked cabinet. Unused pesticide chemicals may be disposed of at a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center. Empty pesticide containers should be triple rinsed prior to disposing of them in the trash. Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center on. o , E C . (714) 834-6752 1—O 44fiOFA www.oclandfills.com r` Vim Did you know that just one quart of oil can pollute 250,000 gallons of water? A clean ocean and healthy creeks, rivers, bays and beaches are important to Orange County. However, not properly disposing of used oil can lead to water pollution. If you pour or drain oil onto driveways, sidewalks or streets, it can be washed into the storm drain. Unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks and toilets), water in storm drains is not treated before entering the ocean. Help prevent water pollution by taking your used oil to a used oil collection center. Included in this brochure is a list of locations that will accept up to five gallons of used motor oil at no cost. Many also accept used oil filters. Please contact the facility before delivering your used oil. This listing of companies is for your reference and does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement of the company. Please note that used oil filters may not be disposed of with regular household trash. They must be taken to a household hazardous waste collection or recycling center in Anaheim, Huntington Beach, Irvine or San Juan Capistrano. For information about these centers, visit www.oclandfills.com. Please do not mix your oil with other substances! K; N For more information, please call the Orange County Stormwater Program at 1 -877 -89 -SPILL (1-877-897-7455) or visit www.watersheds.com. For information about the proper disposal of household hazardous waste, call the Household Waste Hotline at (714) 834-6752 or visit www.ociandfills.com. *S RLCYCLL LsLD OIL For additional information about the nearest oil recycling center, call the Used Oil Program at 1 -800 -CLEANUP or visit www.cleanup.org. R 113Re,'903 �• pd,.M.. ger kdpayer OIL The Ocean Beons at Your Front Door P R OS J E C T P033 10" P R E V E N T I O N A he Wagers Auto Parts #1582 Cypress Kragen Auto Palle #4133 Firestone Store #2736 WA 10 Minute Oil Change All Seasons Tire and Auto Center Inc. 3420 W Linmin Ave., Anaheim, CA 92801 AutoZone #5521 904 W Ora ,n ome Ave., Fullerton. CA 9211 1071 Beach Blvd., La Habra, CA 90631 8100 Lampeon Ave., Same , CA 92841 8173 B-1doest St, Anaheim, CA 92804 (714)828-7977O 5471 Llnwln Ave, Cypreas CA 90630 (]14)526-35]00 (562)691-17310 (]14)3]344320 (714)7@£0900 CIWMB#:300,04103 (714)99546440 CIWMB#: 30-C-06256 CIWMB#. 30.0-01169 CIWMB#.30-C-05909 CIWMB#: 30,0-31]] CIWMB#: 3NC408M Pep Boys#613 Pop Boys ASO Kragen Aorto Parts #1569 NbLfIMMifK AuloZ... 0317 10912 K dri a Ave., A-hm., CA 92804 Big OTi— 1630 S Heater BNtl_ Fulletloq CA 92832 1621 W Wnittier BNtl_ To Habra, CA 90631 AutoZone 0543 423 N Anaheim Blvd, Anaheim, CA 92805 (714)638-08830 STOCenitos Ave., C,mrss,CA90830 (]14)870-01) (562)905-25380 6611 WesMindia Blvd, Westminster CA 92683 (714)78-07870 CIWMB#:30-01]56 (714)826£3340 CIWMB#: 30-C-01755 CIWMB#'.30.6070]8 (714)896-28980 CIWMB#: 30-CA5263 CIWMB#: 36C-04245 CMMSH: 30C.04m4 Pep Boys #683 Sunnyside 76 Car Care Center Pd, Boys M97 AutoZone #5226 3030 W Lincoln Anaheim. CA 92MI Econo Lube N'Tum #213 2701 N Brea Blvd,. Fullerton. CA 92835 125 W Imperial Hwy., La Habra. CA 90631 Auta until #3544 2145 W Linmin Ave., Amheim, CA 92801 (714)8264810O 5497Cama Ave., Cypress, CA 90630 (714)258-0773O (714yW]-0601 O 8481 Westmimter Blvd, Westranskr, CA 92683 (714)533-65990 CIWMB#: 30C-0341] (714)7814456( CIWMB#: 30-001381 CIWMB#'. 36C-04026 (714)891-3511() CIWMB#: 30-0-04604 CIWMB#: 30-C-06240 CIWMB#: 30-C44966 No Bays#809 Garden Geove Shell Olt Change&Tuns Betlar Automotive 8205 E Sante Ane Cyn Rd. Anaheim, CA 92808 Jiffy Lube M51 76 Pm Lube Plus 1580 W Imperial Hwy, to Hebra, CA 90631 City of Westminster Composts Yar W01 E Mbaloma Ave., Mahaim, CA 92006 (714)974-01050 4942 Lincoln Ave.,. Cypress, CA 90HO 9001 Trask Ave., Garden Grove, CA 92844 (562)697-35130 14381 Olive St, Wesbninati,, CA 92683 (713)520-13800 CIWMB#, 30C-03443 (826)865-9659() (714)393-0590() (]14)&95-28]8(292) CIWMB#: 30-0-02205 Civil 30,C -061B2 CIWMB#: 30-C-05276 LOl AYIMfe, CIWM6#: W -C-02000 Plck Youf Part JNty Luba #1740 Classic Chevrolet 1235 S Beach Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92007 M 8 N Coastline Auld Is TOO Servlet AutoZone 95527 3311 lou lla Ave„ Lee Ammer, CA 90720 Honda Wetld 1 M Weir Canyon Rd, Anaheim, CA 92807 (714)52748450 4005 Ball Rd, Cypress, CA 90630 13190 Harbor Blvd, Garden Gmvq CA 92843 (562)5951B27O 13600 Beach Blvd., Wervar, inter, CA 92083 (714)283-54000 CIWMBffi 30-0-03744 (714)026-10010 (714)636-56650 OIWM13R'. 30.0-03529 (714)890.8900() CIWMB#: 30.C-05223 CIWMB#: 30.0-04387 CIWMB#: 30.604780 CIWM&f: 30-C-03639 PK Auto Performed. MidWHY CA) Econo Lube N'Tune #1 3106 W. Lincoln Ave., Anaheim, CA92801 Mastedube#103 David Mumy Shell Bolsa Tmeamiselon Jiffy Luba#1579 3201 W Lenoir Ave., Arca aim, CA 92801 (714)82621410 59M Lincoln Cypress, CA 90630 12571 My View 34 Golden Grove, CA 92845 8331 Bear Ave., Midway Cny, CA 92655 SMI Westerlies, Blvd, vandal CA 92683 (714)8210128() CIWMB#:300-05628 (714)826-23230 (714)898-0170() (714)799-61580 (]14)899-272]0 CIWMB#: 30,0-1485 CIWMB#: 3NC41071 CIWMB#: 30-C-0050 CIWMB#'. 30..06768 CM'MB#: 30,042745 Buick Change Luba antl Oil EZ Lube Inc - Send Reach Sol 2731 WLinmin Ave., Mahaim, CA 92801 Masledube#104 Erymax Luba &leader N.Mii John's Banks &Arm Repair 905 N Weir Canyon Rd, Anaheim, CA 9280] (714)82144640 5971 Ball Rd., Cypreas, CA90630 8100 Lem cmn Ave., Garan Gmve, CA92841 Advanced A. Is Bill 13050 Hoover SL, Westminster, CA 92683 (714)65&13120 CIWMB#130--04363 (714)220-15550 (909)31682810 144 S Bral Planta CA 928M (714)379-MRS8 ) CIWMB#: 30-606011 CIWMB#: 36C-04682 CIWMB#: 301 (714)9911 CMMS#:30-.0561] Salm of Amhelm CIWMB#'. 36606242 Firestone Stare MIC] 1380 SAuto Caner Dc, Anaheim. CA 92806 Metric Motors of Cypress Firestone Store Off SO limited Auto Parts 0762 1200 S Magnolia Ave., Anaheim. CA 92804 (714)648-24440 6042Cemfs Ave., CypreSs,CA90830 10081 Chapman Ave., Garden Gro, CA 92840 Castner9 Auto Same. 6562 Westminster Blvd, Westminster. CA 92683 (949)598-5520() CIWMB#. 30C-08332 (714)82147020 (714)53646300 2143 Bredff Ave.. PI ... mia, CA 92870 (]14)898-0810() CIWMB#: 30-0-05743 CIWMB#:3DC-05157 CIWMB#: 30-601224 (714)528-1311() CIWhl 30-C-02590 Sun Tech Aub S.M. CIWMB#: 36C-06452 Great Westem Lube Express 105 S Stat-0ollege Blvd. Anaheim. CA 92806 NAerfon Firrratons Store #71073 Midway City Sanitary District 125 N Smell St., Anaheim, CA 92801 (714)956-1389O Amw... #2898 13961 Brockhumt SL. Garen Grove, CA 92843 Emno Luba N' Tune 14451 Cedarwood St., Westmin ce5 CA 92683 (714)250.13000 CIWMB#:30-C-06455 146 N. Raymond Ave., FulleMn, CA 92831 (]14)5962741( ) 100 W Chapman Ave., Placcum, OA W870 (714)893-35531 ) CIWMB#: 30-0-05542 (714)070-97720 CIWMB#: 30-603690 (714)524-04240 CIWMB#: W -C-01626 Wnlc Truck Borden CIWMB#: 30.0-04408 CIWMB#'. 30.0-08454 HR Pro Auto Service Cenfo 515 S Rose BL, Anaheim, CA 921305 Jiffy Lube 91991 Pep Boys NO 3180 W Lincoln Ave., Anaheim, CA W801 (714)533-33330 AuWaser #5522 13970 Hamor Blvd, Garden Game, CA 92843 Relay, FOM 15221 Beach Blvd., Westminster, CA 92683 (714)76143430 CIWMB#: 30 C-01142 1801 Orangethorpa W. Fullerfry CA92633 (714)554-06100 1350 E Yorbe Linda BlW., Placentia, CA 92870 (714)89385440 CIWMB#: 30.1 (]14)0]0-2860 CIWMB#: 30.0-05400 (714)524-1200() CIWM&f: 30-603415 AndefthBI HIft CIWMB#: 3DC46062 CIWMB#'. 30.0-01863 Ira Newman Automo4ve Services Anaheim Hill. Corsair 8 Luba K2ger Auto Pard 91251 YOrbi LIMi 1507 N 3tete College Blvd. Anaheim. CA 92806 5810 E La Palma Ave., Anaheim Hills, CA 92807 AutoZone #5523 13933 N Harbor Blvtl_Gromea Grove CA 92843 SBi/ BBiCh AutoZone #5545 (714 35-23920 (714)7/7-68050 102 N Euclid FulleMn, CA 92832 (]14)5543]800 M & N Canadine Auto 8 Tire Service 18628 YON. Linda Ri., Yore Linda, CA 92506 CIWMB#: 30,0-1482 CIWMBik 300-01387 (714)870-2860 CIWMB#: 30-C-02683 12239 Seal Beach Blvd, Seal Beach, CA W740 (714)970.89330 CIWMB#: 36C-04755 (714)82840010 CM'MS#: 30-044971 Jiffy Lube#1028 BrGI Kragen Auto Pard M555 CIWMB#. 30.0-04433 2400 W Bell Rd. Anaheim. CA 92804 Firestone Store MAS EZ Luba 017 9851 Chapman Ave., Garden Grove, CA 92MI Econo Lotus N'Tune (714)761-5211() 091 E Imperial Hwy. Bora, CA 92821 4002 N Harbor Blvd, Fullerton, CA 92835 (714)741-0300 Seal Beach Chevron 22270 La Palma Ave., YoNa Linda, CA 92887 CIWMB#: 30-C-00870 (714)529-8404( ) (714)871-9980( ) CIWMB#: 30-6040]9 12541 Seal Beach Blvd, Seel Beech. CA 90740 (]14)692-8394( ) CIWMB* 30C-01221 CIWMB#:3DC-03741 (949°95-07]4(14) CIWMB#: 30-C46513 Jiffy Lube 41903 Nissan of Graren Grove CIWMB#: 36C-06425 2505 E Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 928M Oil Co. Hanry'6 Flandi Share #PEH 9670 Trask Ave., Garen Grove, CA 92884 EZ Lube Inc. #4 (]14)]7240700 230 N Brea Blvd., Brea, CA 92821 1933 N Placentia Ave, FulleMn, CA 92831 (714)537-09000 scant" 17511 Yoke Linda BIW., Yoke Linde, CA 928M CIWMB4v: 30-0-05511 (714)99619000 (714)993-71000 CIWMB0: 30-3-06553 Audi 02806 (714)556-1312O CIWMB#: 30C-04273 CIWMB#. 30,C-02122 11320 Beam Blvd, Bente, CA 90680 CIWMB#, X -C-05739 Jiffy Luba #2340 Toyota of Gordon Gmve (714)89-5]665( ) 2181 W Lincoln Ave., Anaheim, CA 92801 S. pearld Fox Servlet Center 9444 Trask Ave., Garen Gmvs, CA 92844 CIWMB#'. 30.0-04563 Flmbne St.. 02M (714)533-10700 Firestone Store ill 1018 W Orangemorye Fullerfry CA 92&93 (]14)8955595( ) 18500 Yams Linda BIW., Yams. Linda, CA 92886 CIWMB#:30-C-04647 6011 Orangethorpe Buena Park, CA 90520 (714)079-14300 CIWMB#: 30-C-06555 Joe's Auto Clinic (714)279-19660 (714)6]0-]9120 CIWMB#: 30.0-02318 11783 Beach Blvd., Braden, CA 90680 CIWM&f: 30-601222 Waged Auto Paris 91303 CIWMBk 30L-01218 LJO HHGH (714)891-7715() 1086 N State College BIM„Anaheim, CA 92806 Fullerton College Automotive Technology AutoZone #5532 CIWMB#'. 30.0-03253 Jiffy Luba #102 (]14)956]3510 Firestone Store WITS 321 E Chapman Ave.. Fullism, CA 92832 1200 W Imperial Hwy, Le Habra, CA 90631 1B751 Yams Linda BIW., Yaba Linda, CA 92886 CIWMB#:30.0-3438 8600 Beach Blvd, Buena Park, CA 90820 (]14)992)2760 (562)69453370 Kmged Added Parts M742 (714)528-28000 (714h2]-5300) CIWMB#: 3DC43165 CIW1MB#:30-C-04734 11951 Beach Blvd, Stamen CA 90680 Civai 3OC43M ebal Aro Pard#1399 CIWMB#3GC-02121 (]14)793]5740 2245 W Ball Rtl_Arem ,CA 92804 Wegen Auto pard M731 Burch Ford CIWMB#. 30.0-06231 Mike Sahuld lmmr[ Service (714890-1274() Kragen Auto Pard #1204 2978 Yorba Undo Fullarrq CA92831 201 N Hak., Blvd.. Le Habre, CA 90631 4832 Eureka Ave., Yorba Linda, CA 92886 CIWMB#: 300-4094 5303 Beech Blvd., Buena Park, CA 90621 (]14)9964]800 (582)69132250 ScherTlre #20 (714)528441() (714)984-13200 CIWMB#: 3NC42628 CIWMB#: 30-.05179 7000 Karelia Ave., Seal CA 90680 CI1NMSk 30044313 Kragen Auto Parts M563 CIWMB#30C-02623 (714)89299240 2072 Lincom Ave., Anaheim, CA 92806 CIWMB#. 3NC-05907 (714)602LSMGO CIWMB#: 30-C-04078 This information was provided by the County of Orange Integrated Waste Management Department and the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) Sewage Spill Reaulato ry Ren"iirements Orange County Stormwater Program 24 Hour Water Pollution Reporting Hotline 1 -877 -89 -SPILL (1-877-897-7455) County and city water quality ordinances prohibit discharges containing pollutants. Orange County Health Care Agency Environmental Health (714)433-6419 California Health and Safety Code, Sections 5410-5416 • No person shall discharge raw or treated sewage or other waste in a manner that results in contamination, pollution are nuisance. • Any person who causes or permits a sewage discharge to any state waters: • must immediately notify the local health agency of the discharge. • shall reimburse the local health agency for services that protect the public's health and safety (water -contact receiving waters). • who fails to provide the required notice to the local health agency is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine (between $50041,000) and/or i mprisonment far less than one year. Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region San Diego Region (951)782-4130 (858)467-2952 Requires the prevention, mitigation, response to and reporting of sewage spills. California Office of Emergency Services (800)852-7550 California Water Code, Article 4, Chapter 4, Sections 13268-13271 California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Division 3, Chapter 9.2, Article 2, Sections 2250-2260 Any person who causes or permits sewage in excess of 1,000 gallons to be discharged to state waters shall immediately notify the Office of Emergency Services. Any person who fails to provide the notice required by this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine (less than $20,000) and/or imprisonment for not more than one year. moue Me 4106 N O."'d on,n,W... e, 46) What is a Sewage Spill? Sewage spills occur when the wastewater being transported via underground pipes overflows through a manhole, cleanout or broken pipe. Sewage spills can cause health hazards, damage to homes and businesses, overflown cleanout pi. and threaten the environment, local waterways and located. beaches. private prop Common Causes of Sewage Spills Grease builds up inside and eventually blocks sewer pipes. Grease gets into the sewer from food establishments, household drains, as well as from poorly maintained commercial grease traps and interceptors. Structure problems caused by tree roots in the lines, broken/cracked pipes, missing or broken cleanout caps or undersized sewers can cause blockages. Infiltration and inflow (IA) impacts pipe capacity and is caused when groundwater or rainwater enters the sewer system through pipe defects and illegal connections. You Are Responsible for a Sewage Spill Caused by a Blockage or Break in Your Sewer Lines! Time is of the essence in dealing with sewage spills. You are required to immediately: Control and minimize the spill. Keep spills contained on private property and out of gutters, storm drains and publicwaterways byshutting off or notusing the water. Use sandbags, dirt and/or plastic sheeting to prevent sewage from entering the storm drain system. Clear the sewer blockage. Always wear gloves and wash your hands. It is recommended that a plumbing professional be called for clearing blockages and making necessary repairs. Always notify your city sewer/public works department or public sewer district of sewage spills. If the spill enters the storm drains also notify the Health Care Agency. In addition, if it exceeds 1,000 gallons notify the Office of Emergency Services. Refer to the numbers listed in this brochure. You %-ould Be Liable Allowing sewage from your home, business or property to discharge to a gutter or storm drain may subject you to penalties and/or out-of-pocket costs to reimburse cities or public agencies for clean-up and enforcement efforts. See Regulatory Codes ft Fines section for pertinent codes and fines that apply. What to Look For Sewage spills can be a very noticeable gushing of water from a manhole or a slow water leak that may take time to be noticed. Don't dismiss unaccounted-for wet areas. Lookfor: • Drain backups inside the building. • Wet ground and water leaking around manhole lids onto your street. • Leaking water from cleanouts or outside drains. • Unusual odorous wet areas: sidewalks, external walls or ground/landscape around a building. Caution Keep people and pets away from the affected area. Untreated sewage has high levels of disease -causing viruses and bacteria. Call your local health care agency listed on the back for more information. If You See a Sewage Spill Occurring, Notify Your City Sewer/Public Works Department or Public Sewer District IMMEDIATELY! How a Sewer System Works A property owner's sewer pipes are called service laterals and are connected to larger local main and regional trunk lines. Service laterals run from the connection at the home to the connection with the public sewer (including the area under the street). These laterals are the responsibility of the property owner and must be maintained by the property owner. Many city agencies have adopted ordinances requiring maintenance of service laterals. Check with your city sewer/local public works department for more information. Operation and maintenance of local and regional sewer lines are the responsi- bility of the city sewer/public works depart- ments and public sewer districts. BUSINESS Grease I MEIN ME I canout Trapup ` RESIDENCE Private 0o w e spoutSe rvi ea=7oma;a =,P,o ■ ■ Lat als nne sAwene L . ieanout Local Main Sewer Line 1 / Mai Regional Trunk line Wastewater Sewer Treatment Plant Preventing Grease Blockages The drain is not a dump! Recycle or dispose of grease properly and never pour grease down the drain. Homeowners should mix fats, oils and grease with absor- bent waste materials such as paper, coffee grounds, or kitty litter and place it in the trash. Wipe food scraps from plates and pans and dumpthem inthetrash. Restaurants and commercial food service establishments should always use "Kitchen Best Management Practices." These include: • Collecting all cooking grease and liquid oil from pots, pans and fryers in covered grease containers for recycling. • Scraping or dry -wiping excess food and grease from dishes, pots, pans and fryers into the trash. • Installing drain screens on all kitchen drains. • Having spill kits readily available for cleaning up spills. • Properly maintaining grease traps or interceptors by having them serviced regularly. Check your local city codes. Orange County Agency Responsibilities City Sewer/Public Works Departments— Responsible for protecting city property and streets, the local storm drain system, sewage collection system and other public areas. Public Sewer/Sanitation District— Responsible for collecting, treating and disposing of wastewater. County of Orange Health Care Agency— Responsible for protecting public health by closing ocean/bay waters and may close food -service businesses if a spill poses a threatto public health. Regional Water Quality Control Boards— Responsible for protecting State waters. Orange County Stormwater Program— Responsible for preventing harmful pollutants from being discharged or washed by stormwater runoff into the municipal storm drain system, creeks, bays and the ocean. Report Sewage Spills! City Sewer/Public Works Departments Aliso Viejo ......................... (949) 425-2500 Anaheim ........................... 1714)765-6860 Brea..............................17141990-7691 Buena Park ........................17141562-3655 Costa Mesa ........................ 19491645-8400 Cypress ........................... 1714)229-6760 Dana Point.........................(9491248-3562 Fountain Valley ..................... 17141593-4600 Fullerton ........................... (7141738-6897 Garden Grove .......................17141 741-5375 Huntington Beach ...................(7141536-5921 Irvine ............................. (9491453-5300 Laguna Beach ......................(9491497.0765 Laguna Hills........................(949)707.2650 Laguna Niguel......................(9491362.4337 Laguna Woods ...................... (9491639-0500 La Habra...........................(5621905.9792 Lake Forest .................... (9491461-3480 La Palma ..........................(7141690-3310 Los Alamitos ....................... (5621431-3538 Mission Viejo ....................... (9491831-2500 Newport Beach ..................... (949)644-3011 Orange ............................ (714)532-6480 Orange County ...................... (714) 567-6363 Placentia .......................... (714) 993-8245 Rancho Santa Margarita............ (949) 635-1800 San Clemente ....................... (949) 366-1553 San Juan Capistrano ................ (949)443-6363 Santa Ana .........................(714)647-3380 Seal Beach.........................(562)431-2527 Stanton ........................... (714)379-9222 Tustin ............................. (714)962-2411 Villa Park..........................(714)998-1500 Westminster ....................... (714) 893-3553 Yorba Linda ........................ (714) 961-7170 Public Sewer/Water Districts Costa Mesa Sanitary District .......... (714) 393-4433/ (949)645-8400 EI Tara Water District ................ (949) 837-0660 Emerald Bay Service District .......... (949) 494-8571 Garden Grove Sanitary District ......... (714) 741-5375 Irvine Ranch Water District ............ (949) 453-5300 Los Alamites/Rossmeor Sewer District ... (562) 431-2223 Midway City Sanitary District (Westminster) (714)893-3553 Moulton Niguel Water District ......... (949) 831.2500 Orange County Sanitation District....... (714) 962.2411 Santa Margarita Water District ........ (949) 459-6420 South Coast Water District ............ (949) 4994555 South Orange County Wastewater Authority (949) 234-5400 Sunset Beach Sanitary District......... (562) 493.9932 Trabuco Canyon Sanitary District ....... (949) 858.0277 Yorba Linda Water District ............ (714) 777.3018 Other Agencies Orange County Health Care Agency ..... (714) 433-6419 Office of Emergency Services.......... (800) 852-7550 IVI lean beaches and healthy creeks, rivers, bays and ocean are important to Orange County. However, many common activities can lead to water pollution if you're not careful. Home improvement projects and work sites must be maintained to ensure that building materials do not enter the street, gutter or storm drain. Unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks and toilets), water in storm drains is not treated before entering our waterways. You would never dump building materials into the ocean, so don't let them enter the storm drains. Follow these tips to help prevent water pollution. Help Prevent Ocean Pollution: Tips for Improvement Projects Home improvement projects can cause significant damage to the environment. Whether you hire a contractor or work on the house yourself, it is important to follow these simple tips while renovating, remodeling or improving your home: General Construction ■ Schedule projects for dry weather. ■ Keep all construction debris away from the street, gutter and storm drain. ■ Store materials under cover with temporary roofs or plastic sheets to eliminate or reduce the possibility that rainfall, runoff or wind will carry materials from the project site to the street, storm drain or adjacent properties. Building Materials ■ Never hose materials into a street, gutter or storm drain. ■ Exposed piles of construction material should not be stored on the street or sidewalk. ■ Minimize waste by ordering only the amount of materials needed to complete the job. ■ Do not mix more fresh concrete than is needed for each project. ■ Wash concrete mixers and equipment in a designated washout area where the water can flow into a containment area or onto dirt ■ Dispose of small amounts of dry excess materials in the trash. Powdery waste, such as dry concrete, must be properly contained within a box or bag prior to disposal. Call your local trash hauler for weight and size limits. Paint ■ Measure the room or object to be painted, then buy only the amount needed. ■ Place the lid on firmly and store the paint can upside- down in a dry location away from the elements. ■ Tools such as brushes, buckets and rags should never be washed where excess water can drain into the street, gutter or storm drain. All tools should be rinsed in a sink connected to the sanitary sewer. ■ When disposing of paint, never put wet paint in the trash. ■ Dispose of water-based paint by removing the lid and letting it dry in the can. Large amounts must be taken to a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center (HHWCC). ■ Oil-based paint is a household hazardous waste. All leftover paint should be taken to a HHWCC. ■ For HHWCC locations and hours, call (714) 834-6752 or visit www oclandfdls.com. Erosion Control ■ Schedule grading and excavation projects for dry weather. ■ When temporarily removing soil, pile it in a contained, covered area where it cannot spill into the street, or obtain the required temporary encroachment or street closure permit and follow the conditions instructed by the permit. ■ When permanently removing large quantities of soil, a disposal location must be found prior to excavation. Numerous businesses are available to handle disposal needs. For disposal options, visit www.dwmb.ca.gov/SWIS. ■ Prevent erosion by planting fast-growing annual and perennial grasses. They will shield and bind the soil. Recycle ■ Use a construction and demolition recycling company to recycle lumber, paper, cardboard, metals, masonry (bricks, concrete, etc.), carpet, plastic, pipes (plastic, metal and clay), drywall, rocks, dirt and green waste. ■ For a listing of construction and demolition recycling locations in your area, visit www.ciwmb.m.gov/recycle. spills ■ Clean up spills immediately by using an absorbent material such as cat litter, then sweep it up and dispose of it in the trash. ■ Immediately report spills that have entered the street, gutter or storm drain to the County's 24 -Hour Water Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline at (714) 567-6363 or visit www.ocwatenheds.com to. fill out an incident reporting form. P R O 1 E C T FbBt tion PREVENTION .t` lean beaches M 'ITN and healthy creeks, rivers, bays and ocean are important to Orange County. However, many common activities can lead to water pollution if you're not careful. Fertilizers, pesticides and other chemicals that are left on yards or driveways can be blown or washed into storm drains that flow to the ocean. Overwatering lawns can also send materials into storm drains. Unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks and toilets), water in storm drains is not treated before entering our waterways. You would never pour gardening products into the ocean, so don't let them enter the storm drains. Follow these easy tips to help prevent water pollution. Help Prevent Ocean Pollution: Tips for Landscape & Gardening ,r y i 04 'PON Never allow gardening products or polluted water to enter the street, gutter or storm drain. General Landscaping Tips ■ Protect stockpiles and materials from wind and rain by storing them under tarps or secured plastic sheeting. ■Prevent erosion of slopes by planting fast-growing, dense ground covering plants. These will shield and bind the soil. ■Plant native vegetation to reduce the amount of water, fertilizers, and pesticide applied to the landscape. ■Never apply pesticides or fertilizers when rain is predicted within the next 48 hours. Garden & Lawn Maintenance ■Do not overwater. Use irrigation practices such as drip irrigation, soaker hoses or micro spray systems. Periodically inspect and fix leaks and misdirected sprinklers. ■ Do not rake or blow leaves, clippings or pruning waste into the street, gutter or storm drain. Instead, dispose of green waste by composting, hauling it to a permitted landfill, or recycling it through your city's program. ■ Use slow-release fertilizers to minimize leaching, and use organic fertilizers. ■ Read labels and use only as directed. Do not over -apply pesticides or fertilizers. Apply to spots as needed, rather than blanketing an entire area. ■ Store pesticides, fertilizers and other chemicals in a dry covered area to prevent exposure that may result in the deterioration of containers and packaging. ■ Rinse empty pesticide containers and re -use rinse water as you would use the product. Do not dump rinse water down storm drains. Dispose of empty containers in the trash. ■ When available, use non-toxic alternatives to traditional pesticides, and use pesticides specifically designed to control the pest you are targeting. For more information, visit www.ipm.ucdavis.edu. ■ If fertilizer is spilled, sweep up the spill before irrigating. If the spill is liquid, apply an absorbent material such as cat litter, and then sweep it up and dispose of it in the trash. ■Take unwanted pesticides to a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center to be recycled. Locations are provided below. For more information, please call the Orange County Stormwater Program at 1 -877 -89 -SPILL (1-877-897-7455) or visit www.ocwatersheds.com To report a spill, call the Orange County 24 -Hour Water Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline 1 -877 -89 -SPILL (1-877-897-7455). For emergencies, dial 911. ft I fk4 !'he Ocean Begins at Your Front Door ca„ The tips contained in this brochure provide useful' information to help prevent water pollution while caring for your pet. If you have other suggestions, 1 . please contact your city's stormwater representatives or call the Orange County Stormwater Program. Printed on Recycled Paper P R O J E C T POWAIOM PRE V E NT10N, Never let any pet care products or washwater run off your yard and into the street, gutter or storm drain. Washing Your Pets Even biodegradable soaps and shampoos can be harmful to marine life and the environment. ■If possible, bathe your pets indoors using less -toxic shampoos or have your pet professionally groomed. Follow instructions on the products and clean up spills. ■If you bathe your pet outside, wash it on your lawn or another absorbent/ permeable surface to keep the washwater from running into the street, gutter or storm drain. Flea Control ■ Consider using oral or topical flea control products. 0 I you use flea control products such as shampoos, sprays or collars, make sure to dispose of any unused products at a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center. For location information, call (714) 834-6752. Why You Should Pick Up After Your Pet It's the lawl Every city has an ordinance requiring you to pick up after your pet. Besides being a nuisance, pet waste can lead to water pollution, even if you live inland. During rainfall, pet waste left outdoors can wash into storm drains. This waste flows directly into our waterways and the ocean where it can harm human health, marine life and the environment. As it decomposes, pet waste demands a high level of oxygen from water. This decomposition can contribute to killing marine life by reducing the amount of dissolved oxygen available to them. Have fun with your pets, but please be a responsible pet owner by taking care of them and the environment. ■ Take a bag with you on walks to pick up after your pet. ■ Dispose of the waste in the trash or in a toilet. P E o T E c T POMAlOtA P A E V E N T 1 O N t� The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door 1 1 .✓ Y • Alt will ROM 15" IM 40 • � ti u 4� ��T�I ;i t A 1 4 , Never allow pollutants to enter the Follow these simple steps to help reduce water pollution: Household Activities ■Do not rinse spills with water. Use dry cleanup methods such as applying cat litter or another absorbent material, sweep and dispose of in the trash. Take items such as used or excess batteries, oven cleaners, automotive fluids, painting products and cathode ray tubes, like TVs and computer monitors, to a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center (HHWCC). ■For a HHWCC near you call (714) 834-6752 or visit www.oclandfills.com. ■Do not hose down your driveway, sidewalk or patio to the street, gutter or storm drain. Sweep up debris and dispose of it in the trash. Automotive ■Take your vehicle to a commercial car wash whenever possible. If you wash your vehicle at home, choose soaps, cleaners, or detergents labeled non-toxic, phosphate- free or biodegradable. Vegetable and citrus -based products are typically safest for the environment. ■Do not allow washwater from vehicle washing to drain into the street, gutter or storm drain. Excess washwater should be disposed of in the sanitary sewer (through a sink or toilet) or onto an absorbent surface like your lawn. ■Monitor your vehicles for leaks and place a pan under leaks. Keep your vehicles well maintained to stop and prevent leaks. ■Never pour oil or antifreeze in the street, gutter or storm drain. Recycle these substances at a service station, a waste oil collection center or used oil recycling center. For the nearest Used Oil Collection Center call 1 -800 -CLEANUP or visit www.1800cleantip.org. Pool Maintenance ■Pool and spa water must be dechlorinated and free of excess acid, alkali or color to be allowed in the street, gutter or storm drain. ■When it is not raining, drain dechlorinated pool and spa water directly into the sanitary sewer. ■Some cities may have ordinances that do not allow pool water to be disposed of in the storm drain. Check with your city. Landscape and Gardening ■Do not over -water. Water your lawn and garden by hand to control the amount of water you use or set irrigation systems to reflect seasonal water needs. If water flows off your yard onto your driveway or sidewalk, your system is over -watering. Periodically inspect and fix leaks and misdirected sprinklers. ■Do not rake or blow leaves,clippings or pruning waste into the street, gutter or storm drain. Instead, dispose of waste by composting, hauling it to a permitted landfill, or as green waste through your city's recycling program. ■Follow directions on pesticides and fertilizer, (measure, do not estimate amounts) and do not use if rain is predicted within 48 hours. ■Take unwanted pesticides to a H14WCC to be recycled. For locations and hours of HHWCC, call (714) 834-6752 or visit www.oclandfills.com. Trash ■Place trash and litter that cannot be recycled in securely covered trash cans. ■N171renever possible, buy recycled products. ■Remember: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle. Pet Care ■Always pick up after your pet. Flush waste down the toilet or dispose of it in the trash. Pet waste, if left outdoors, can wash into the street, gutter or storm drain. ■If possible, bathe your pets indoors. If you must bathe your pet outside, wash it on your lawn or another absorbent/permeable surface to keep thewashwater from entering the street, gutter or storm drain. ■Follow directions for use of pet care products and dispose of any unused products at a HHWCC. Did You Know? ■Most people believe that the largest source of water pollution in urban areas comes from specific sources such as factories and sewage treatment plants. In fact, the largest source of water pollution comes from city streets, neighborhoods, construction sites and parking lots. This type of pollution is sometimes called "non -point source" pollution. ■There are two types of non -point source pollution: stormwater and urban runoff pollution. ■ Stormwater runoff results from rainfall. When rainstorms cause large volumes of water to rinse the urban landscape, picking up pollutants along the way. ■ Urban runoff can happen any time of the year when excessive water use from irrigation, vehicle washing and other sources carries trash,. lawn clippings and other urban pollutants into storm drains. Where Does It Go? ■Anything we use outside homes, vehicles and businesses — like motor oil, paint, pesticides, fertilizers and cleaners — can be blown or washed into storm drains. ■A little water from a garden hose or rain can also send materials into storm drains. ■ Storm drains are separate from our sanitary sewer systems; unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks or toilets), water in storm drains is not treated before entering our waterways. Sources of Non -Point Source Pollution ■Automotive leaks and spills. ■Improper disposal of used oil and other engine fluids. ■Metals found in vehicle exhaust, weathered paint, rust, metal plating and tires. ■Pesticides and fertilizers from lawns, gardens and farms. ■Improper disposal of cleaners, paint and paint removers. ■Soil erosion and dust debris from landscape and construction activities. ■Litter, lawn clippings, animal waste, and other organic matter. ■Oil stains on parking lots and paved surfaces. The Effect on the Ocean Non -point source pollution can have a serious impact on water quality in Orange County. Pollutants from the storm drain system can harm marine life as well as coastal and wetland habitats. They can also degrade recreation areas such as beaches, harbors and bays. Stormwater quality management programs have been developed throughout Orange County to educate and encourage the public to protect water quality, monitor runoff in the storm drain system, investigate illegal dumping and maintain storm drains. Support from Orange. County residents and businesses is needed to improve water quality and reduce urban runoff pollution. Proper use and disposal of materials will help stop pollution before it reaches the storm drain and the ocean. California Environmental Protection Agency www.calepa.ca.gov, • Air Resources Board www.arb.ca.gov • Department of Pesticide Regulation wwwccipr.ca.gov • Department of Toxic Substances Control w vxltsc.ca.gov • Integrated Waste Management Board www.ciwmb.ca.gov • Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment www.oehha.ca.gov • State Water Resources Control Board www.svatcrboardsxa.gov gov Earth 911 - Community -Specific Environmental Information 1-800clea rap or visit www.1800clearup. org Health Care Agency's Ocean and Bay Water Closure and Posting Hotline (714) 433-6400 or visit www.ocbeachinfo.com Integrated Waste Management Dept. of Orange County (714) 834-6752 or visit www.oclandfillsxom for information on household hazardous waste collection centers, recycling centers and solid waste collection O.C. Agriculture Commissioner (714) 447-7100 or visit wnnv.ocagcomm.com Stormwater Best Management Practice Handbook Visit vntiv.cabmphandbooks.com UC Master Gardener Hotline (714) 708-1646 or visit ,.uccemg.com The Orange County Stormwater Program has created and moderates an electronic mailing list to facilitate communications, take questions and exchange ideas among its users about issues and topics related to stormwater and urban runoff and the implementation of program elements. To join the list, please send an email to ocstormwaterinfo-join@list.ocwatersheds.com Aliso Viejo ...................... (949) 4252535 Anaheim Public Works Operations ........ (714) 7656860 Brea Engineering .................. (714) 990-7666 Buena Park Public Works ............. (714) 562-3655 Costa Mesa Public Services ... ... ... .... (714) 754-5323 Cypress Public Works ... ... ... ... .... (714) 229-6740 Dana Point Public Works . ... ... ... .... (949) 248-3584 Fountain Valley Public Works . ... ... .. . . (714) 593-4441 Fullerton Engineering Dept .. . . . . . . . . . . . (714) 738-6853 Garden Grove Public Works .. ... ... .. . . (714) 741-5956 Huntington Beach Public Works .. ... .. . . (714) 536-5431 Irvine Public Works . .. . ... .. . ... .. . . (949) 724-6315 La Habra Public Services .............. (562) 9059792 La Palma Public Works .. ... ... ... .. . . (714) 690-3310 Laguna Beach Water Quality............ (949) 497-0378 Laguna Hills Public Services............ (949) 707-2650 Laguna Niguel Public Works . ... ... .... (949) 362-4337 Laguna Woods Public Works.. ... ... .. . . (949) 639-0500 Lake Forest Public Works ... ... ... .. . . (949) 461-3480 Los Alamitos Community Dev.. ... ... .. . . (562) 431-3538 Mission Viejo Public Works ............ (949) 470-3056 Newport Beach, Code & Water Quality Enforcement ................ (949) 644-3215 Omnge Public Works ... ... ... ... .. . . (714) 532-6480 Placentia Public Warks .. ... ... ... .. . .(714) 993-8245 Rancho Santa Margarita .............. (949) 635-1800 San Clemente Environmental Programs ... . . (949) 361-6143 San juan Capistrano Engineering .. ... .. . . (949) 234-4413 Santa Ana Public Works .............. (714) 647-3380 Seal Beach Engineering . ... ... ... ... (562) 431-2527 x317 Stanton Public Works .. . ........ . .. . (714) 379-9222 x204 Tustin Public Works/Engineering......... (714) 573-3150 Villa Park Engineering ............... (714) 998-1500 Westminster Public Works/Engineering . .. . (714) 898-3311 x446 Yorba Linda Engineering ..... . .. . . . . . (714) 961-7138 Orange County Stormwater Program ... .. .(877) 897-7455 Orange County 24 -Hour Water Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline 1 -877 -89 -SPILL (1-877-897-7455) On-line Water Pollution Problem Reporting Form w w w. o c w a t e r s h e d s. c o In R SS OSS J E C T 103W10V1 R E V E N T 1 0 N ATTACHMENT B n. lei e T LEGEND: DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA (DMA) A-# DMA NUMBER & AREA SIZE (AC) AC FLOW DIRECTION PERVIOUS AREA IMPERVIOUS AREA BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES: — IMPERVIOUS AREA REDUCTION — IMPERVIOUS DISPERSION — STREET TREES SCALE: 1" = 20' 0 10 20 40 0 min REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY I CHK. APPR. e 3 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DESIGN Jc 3355 & 3303 VIA LIDO 3 DWN. JC MULTI -FAMILY PROJ ECT d PLANS PREPARED BY: CHK, BMP EXHIBIT DM 3 "6ft'27056 BURBANK T. 949.915.3800 SHT. 1 OF 1 CONSULTIING, INC. F. 249.905.3805CITY ENGINEER DATE DWG. N0. CIVIL ENGINEEIRING R.c.E _____, EXP. DATE _ LAND PLANNING & SURVEYING CVC ONCMET e ATTACHMENT C Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) Table 2.7: Infiltration BMP Feasibility Worksheet Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www. ocwa tersheds. co m/WQMP. aspx Infeasibility Criteria Yes No Would Infiltration BMPs pose significant risk for 1 groundwater related concerns? Refer to Appendix X VII (Worksheet 1) for guidance on groundwater -related infiltration feasibility criteria. Provide basis: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. Would Infiltration BMPs pose significant risk of increasing risk of geotechnical hazards that cannot be mitigated to an acceptable level? (Yes if the answer to any of the following questions is yes, as established by a geotechnical expert): • The BMP can only be located less than 50 feet 2 away from slopes steeper than 15 percent X • The BMP can only be located less than eight feet from building foundations or an alternative setback. • A study prepared by a geotechnical professional or an available watershed study substantiates that stormwater infiltration would potentially result in significantly increased risks of geotechnical hazards that cannot be mitigated to an acceptable level. Provide basis: Geotechnical Engineering Services Report dated 08/24/12 by Professional Service Industries, Inc. indicates that perched groundwater conditions can develop during periods of heavy rainfall as a result of less permeable layers impeding infiltration. Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. 3 Would infiltration of the DCV from drainage area violate X downstream water rights? Provide basis: Per TGD, Figure XVI -3d, the project site is not located within a watershed with impaired bodies. Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www. ocwa tersheds. co m/WQMP. aspx Table 2.7: Infiltration BMP Feasibility Worksheet (continued) Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www. ocwa tersheds. co m/WQMP. aspx Partial Infeasibility Criteria Yes No Is proposed infiltration facility located on HSG D soils or 4 the site geotechnical investigation identifies presence of soil X characteristics which support categorization as D soils? Provide basis: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. Is measured infiltration rate below proposed facility 5 less than 0.3 inches per hour? This calculation shall be X based on the methods described in Appendix VII. Provide basis: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. Would reduction of over predeveloped conditions cause impairments to downstream beneficial uses, such as 6 change of seasonality of ephemeral washes or X increased discharge of contaminated groundwater to surface waters? Provide citation to applicable study and summarize findings relative to the amount of infiltration that is permissible: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. Would an increase in infiltration over predeveloped conditions cause impairments to downstream 7 beneficial uses, such as change of seasonality of X ephemeral washes or increased discharge of contaminated groundwater to surface waters? Provide citation to applicable study and summarize findings relative to the amount of infiltration that is permissible: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www. ocwa tersheds. co m/WQMP. aspx Table 2.7: Infiltration BMP Feasibility Worksheet (continued) Infiltration Screening Results (check box corresponding to result): Is there substantial evidence that infiltration from the project would result in a significant increase in I&I to the sanitary sewer that cannot be sufficiently mitigated? (See Appendix XVII) 8 Provide narrative discussion and supporting evidence: No Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion -of-study/data source applicability. If any answer from row 1-3 is yes: infiltration of any volume is not feasible within the DMA or equivalent. g Provide basis: Not Feasible Summarize findings of infeasibility screening If any answer from row 4-7 is yes, infiltration is permissible but is not presumed to be feasible for the entire DCV. Criteria for designing biotreatment BMPs to achieve the maximum feasible infiltration and ET shall apply. 10 Permissible Provide basis: Summarize findings of infeasibility screening If all answers to rows 1 through 11 are no, infiltration of the 11 full DCV is potentially feasible, BMPs must be designed to Not Feasible infiltrate the full DCV to the maximum extent practicable. Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www. ocwa tersheds. co m/WQMP. aspx Worksheet A: Hydrologic Source Control Calculation Form Drainage area ID A Total drainage area 1.196 acres Total drainage area Impervious Area (IA,o,al) 1.064 acres HSC ID HSC Type/ Description/ Reference BMP Fact Sheet Effect of individual HSCi per criteria in BMP Fact Sheets (XIV.1) (dHSQ)1 Impervious Area Tributary to HSC; (IA) d; x IAi A HSC -2: Impervious Dispersion 0.54 1.064 0.575 A HSC -3: Street Trees 0.05 0.025 0.001 Box 1: Box 2: [Box 1]/[Box 21: d; x IAi = 0.576 Mtorat= 1.089 dHsctotat= 0.529 Percent Capture Provided by HSCs (Table 111.1) 66% 1 - For HSCs meeting criteria to be considered self-retaining, enter the DCV for the project. Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www. ocwa tersheds. co m/WQMP. aspx Worksheet B: Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter design capture storm depth from Figure 111.1, d inches d= 0.60 inches 2 Enter the effect of provided HSCs, dHsc (inches) Worksheet A dHSC= 0.529 inches 3 Calculate the remainder of the design capture storm depth, d,amamda inches Line 1 — Line 2 dmmalnder= 0.071 inches Step 2: Calculate the DCV 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A acres A= 1.064 acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp unitless imp= 0.890 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= 0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= 0.817 4 Calculate runoff volume, Vdasig„= (C x dn,,nainda, x A x 43560 x 1/12 = Vdes 9" 224 cu -ft Step 3: Design BMPs to ensure full retention of the DCV Step 3a: Determine design infiltration rate — N/A 1 Enter measured infiltration rate, Kmeasur.d (in/hr) A endix VII Kmeasarea= — In/hr 2 Enter combined safety factor from Worksheet H, S,;nar (unitless) Sfnal= — 3 Calculate design infiltration rate, Kdesi n = Kmeasured /S(final Kdes;gn= — In/hr Step 3b: Determine minimum BMP footprint — N/A 4 Enter drawdown time, T max 48 hours T= — Hours 5 Calculate max retention depth that can be drawn down within the drawdown time (feet), Dma, = Kdesi n x T x 1/12 Dmaz _ — feet 6 Calculate minimum area required for BMP (sq -ft), Amin = Vdasi ,l dmax Amin — sq -ft Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www. ocwa tersheds. co m/WQMP. aspx Worksheet D: Capture Efficiency Method for Flow -Based BMPs Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter the time of concentration, Te (min) (See Appendix IV.2) T�= 7.9 Using Figure 111.4, determine the design intensity at which the estimated time of concentration (Te) achieves 80% capture 1,= 0.23 in/hr 2 efficiency, lI 3 Enter the effect depth of provided HSCs upstream, dHsc dHsc= 0.59 inches (inches) (Worksheet A) 4 Enter capture efficiency corresponding to dHsc, 1'z Yz= 70 e /o (Worksheet A) Using Figure 111.4, determine the design intensity at which the 5 time of concentration (T,) achieves the upstream capture 12= 0.17 efficiency(Yz), Iz Determine the design intensity that must be provided by BMP, 6 ltlesign= 17-12 leesign= 0.06 Step 2: Calculate the design flowrate 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A (acres) A= 1.064 acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless) imp= 0.89 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= 0.817 4 Calculate design flowrate, Qdesign= (C x idesign x A) Qdeslgn 0.052 cfs Supporting Calculations Describe system: Proposed impervious dispersion, street trees and impervious area reduction. See report for additional information and calculations. Provide time of concentration assumptions: Time of concentration was determined using the Orange County Hydrology Manual. Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www. ocwa tersheds. co m/WQMP. aspx Worksheet D: Capture Efficiency Method for Flow -Based BMPs Graphical Operations 100% 9095 � 8096 U iE 70% LU CU fi096 �_ f I [� 50% i �ro �.' —Tc �= 60 minutes = 40% c --t�Tc = 30 minutes � ii a di 3096 —�`%= 24 minutes - pox .. S9 209/a ; , �i Tc= 10 minutes S ;rr —Q Tc �= 5 minutes 1 a96 ----Extrapolated Data 4�k 0-05 0.14 0-00 0.15 0-20 0-25 0.30 0..35 0-40 Design Intensity, in/hr Provide supporting graphical operations. See Example 111.7. Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance F Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www. ocwa tersheds. co m/YVQMP. aspx ATTACHMENT D Susceptibility Potential Areas of Erosion,Habitat, & Physical Structure Susceptibility Channel Type — Earth (Unstable) — Earth(Stabili.d) — Stabilized Tidel Influence = <= Mean High Water Line (4.28') Water Body ® Been Dam Lake Reservoir Other Lands = Airport Military Santa Ana Rear Watershed tFuala Wf3r. 14, L9 MEY09-0)H rp �.rs J / \ 4 r�x-rx � swm ararge _ county Feet a 4,000 a,00d ts,000 r it N Z 1-3d i W IaVeu islet .. y ,_(m.Wflb',ISYis Sa. Ana R'er Wet.tal. r. . ZVEr uR�APVVX` zc' �s AR"xm / rp �.rs J / \ 4 r�x-rx � swm ararge _ county Feet a 4,000 a,00d ts,000 r it N Z 1-3d - LEGEND _ o Orange County Precipitation Stations 24 Hour, 85th Percentile Rainfall (Inches) 11 --- 24 Hour, 85th Percentile Rainfall (Inches)- Extrapolated / d City Boundaries " Rainfall Zones Design Capture Storm Depth (inches) ` 0.85" J t 1 ® 0.7 0.75 0 0.80 0.85 0.95 � 1.00 11W Not '.E 6berried as 24 M1our penotls lralentlar deys)wtM1 greater on G of einrail. Fo I tl of evaleble dela wverege pmless onal lutlgment � Lh be applied r i.` -•® L I W$ a XVI-2al 'd=• LEGEND E] City Boundatles Hydrologic Soil Groups ASoils ASoils C Soils D Sons source Soils: Nat,ml Resouroas Couserval on SBMne (NRCS) Sall Survey � so Ca8]S, Oangs County 8 Western Rlverside a.^e D to of publ catlpn 2008-02-08 Mtp:ff bsollsuryey.ores.usda.govlapplHomePage,ton r. \ W$ a XVI-2al VE wl aj XVI -2b •-- - • .,seande ��.. y—z••I � ♦~♦... -_•. v �" ..l LEGEND � a i p •� f s C] City Boundaries Seismic Haaards (21�n '•� = Potential Landslide Area —J� ° 5 r°e: 0 .F. } - { r...,, �4 �• '> 4SaInno HavandZone Mala 0` y� 1 V D of Mines dG ,C lama Gei Survey _ j P cl r Data zoos Data o leaded 024)9-2011t "♦ S { nn coaservaa / Ifhz /Pa _°, ^ Y .•\ t ( P - 9 9a P 9°s/Intlex-asP* O 4 :t. i � F)Y •-`fir %• k i %• ill, j• s ♦ / LLLLLL \ XVI-2c EhTTPJIJd LEGEND / ' i DepthTo First Groundwater Contours .---..—......_..�/] City Boundaries C]C OCWD Groundwater Basin Protection Boundary Note'.Data are not available for South Orange County at thle tl,n, p F Ile and 1980. li L CI.firrrla 0 ofMine, erM Geoloy Calf ma Creolo9iral Survey - a t � _ � 3 9 UJI N 0 ,15 15 5 ---.�' XVI-2d — .` % KI—a�° y - fr _ — NI v 1 ,15 11 5 EFETTPM�d F-- ......... rig 8 da ar ................ LEGEND WI Er] City Boundaries CM OCWD Groundwater Basin Protection Boundary > R9 Depth To Groundwater XVI -2e — 5. r - Note. Date are set available for South orange County at this time, 1% source i t 1! l t t o L �� �` ,�' Strode. Fuller and Greenwood 1380. Call Dii of Mines aM G..Idi California Geologiesd Survey TE T it ILI, r % % KI—a�° y - fr _ — NI v 1 ,15 11 5 ......... rig 8 da ar ................ WI ij XVI -2e .. ^A 1 25 11 1_ XVI -2f LEGEND City Boundaries OCWO Groundwater Basin Protection Boundary Plume Protection Boundaries North Basin Groundwater Protection Project N� C South Basin Groundwater Protection Project --- EI Toro Marine Base - Tustin Marine Air Base - Approximate Selenium Contamination Area \\\ _ Note Individual counra ro t not plotted. — See State Water Resources Contf I Bound! (Soaracker database (http i/gactrabour waflartrounds,be goy), D o rt t of Toxic Substance Coni l Ervinator database (ht�.11 t Gt seg ( and other applcable sobrws . lis(ng of act ve contaminaletl 5leandwater basin antl plume pnotextor boundaries for tnent Crarge County are not sbnwn on s is exhibit0me �a 1 .. ^A 1 25 11 1_ XVI -2f 30 -9u 40O VU ti43 33 Ci�R W � ^ - _ ~� � � ��. r^ T-; s,. ^ LEGEND ® OCWO Ground,ater Basin Protection Boundary g - � I� CiCityeoundariestlaries Infiltration Constraints IT 1 Constraint Cvn7 - 6 _ ` ® 2 Overlapping Constralnts 3 Overlapping Constraints 0 Q Was, 4 Overlapping Constraints a Q a Q N '} - --' LL j t A Layers 1 Hydrologicic Soil roG t Land e = Zone, 3. Groundwater Protecon Araou 4 App xants S I' Ar 5 Daii to Groundwater c5 t p d .:• •`� �'j y,J . "Y /� \ �� �— Note S,cremingpissessawrotawhausive TM1 pPl 1 M1 Id always conduct le' f 1 Llesta p f I tl I jl g f a.e � � Alai t Infiltration constraints a pan of assassin, the leasbllity of w t hMlhatl n S r� 4 Q U on nstrant Analysis: PACEIGeosYntec `. InfilVatCo Mf � � _ w 1 �i�`Y 7 s ` ' a[ as . \ . t `p W_ ,.� a 1 12 sae,a$ e ,_. XVI -2g ATTACHMENT E ATTACHMENT F Water Quality Management Plan Notice of Transfer of Responsibility Submission of this Notice of Transfer of Responsibility constitutes notice to the City of Garden Grove that responsibility for the Water Quality Management Plan ("WQMP") for the subject property identified below, and implementation of that plan, is being transferred from the Previous Owner (and his/ her agent) of the site (or a portion thereof) to the New Owner, as further described below. I. Previous Owner/ Previous Responsibility Party Information Company/ Individual Name Contact Person Street Address Title City State Zip Phone II. Information about Site Transferred Name of Project Title of WQMP Applicable to Site: Street Address of Site Tract Number(s) for Site Lot Numbers Date WQMP Prepared (or Revised) III. New Owner/ New Responsible Party Information Company/ Individual Name Contact Person Street Address Title City State Zip Phone IV. Ownership Transfer Information General Description of Site Transferred to New Owner General Description of Portion of Project/ Parcel Subject to WQMP Retained by Owner (if any) Lot/ Tract Number(s) of Site Transferred to New Owner Remaining Lot/ Tract Number(s) to WQMP still held by Owner (if any) Date of Ownership Transfer Note: When the Previous Owner is transferring a Site that is a portion of a larger project/ parcel addressed by the WQMP, as opposed to the entire project/ parcel addressed by the WQMP, the General Description of the Site transferred and the remainder of the project/ parcel no transferred shall be set forth as maps attached to this notice. These maps shall show those portions of the project/ parcel addressed by the WQMP that are transferred to the New Owner (the Transferred Site), those portions retained by the Previous Owner, and those portions previously transferred by the Previous Owner. Those portions retained by the Previous Owner shall be labeled "Previous Owner," and those portions previously transferred by the Previous Owner shall be labeled as "Previously Transferred." V. Purpose of Notice of Transfer The purposes of this Notice of Transfer of Responsibility are: 1) to track transfer of responsibility for implementation and amendment of the WQMP when property to which the WQMP is transferred from the Previous Owner to the New Owner, and 2) to facilitate notification to a transferee of property subject to a WQMP that such New Owner is now the Responsible Party of record for the WQMP for this portions of the site that it owns. VI. Certifications A. Previous Owner I certify under penalty of law that I am no longer the owner of the Transferred Site as described in Section 11 above. I have provided the New Owner with a copy of the WQMP applicable to the Transferred Site that the New Owner is acquiring from the New Owner. Print Name of Previous Owner Representative Title Signature of Previous Owner Representative Date B. New Owner I certify under penalty of law that I am the owner of the Transferred Site, as described in Section II above, that I have been provided a copy of the WQMP, and that I have informed myself and understand the New Owner's responsibilities related to the WQMP, its implementation, and Best Management Practices associated with it. I understand that by signing this notice, the New Owner is accepting all ongoing responsibilities for implementation and amendment of the WQMP for the Transferred Site, which the New Owner has acquired from the Previous Owner. Print Name of New Owner Representative Title Signature of New Owner Representative Date ATTACHMENT G CONTENTS PAGE No. PROJECT INFORMATION...........................................................................................................1 PROJECT AUTHORIZATION...........................................................................................................1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION...............................................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES............................................................................................1 SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS....................................................................................2 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION...............................................................................................2 REGIONALGEOLOGY.....................................................................................................................2 REGIONAL SEISMICITY.................................................................................................................3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS...........................................................................................................3 GROUNDWATER INFORMATION.....................................................................................................4 LABORATORY TESTING................................................................................................................4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................5 GENERAL....................................................................................................................................5 EARTHQUAKE AND SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS.................................................................5 SITE PREPARATION & GRADING...................................................................................................7 TEMPORARY EXCAVATION CONSIDERATIONS................................................................................9 SHALLOWFOUNDATIONS...........................................................................................................10 PAVEMENTDESIGN....................................................................................................................12 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS.............................................................................................14 PLANREVIEW............................................................................................................................14 OBSERVATION AND TESTING DURING CONSTRUCTION................................................................15 REPORT LIMITATIONS.............................................................................................................15 APPENDIX SITE VICINITY MAP................................................................................................................. FIGURE 1 BORING LOCATION MAP.......................................................................................................... FIGURE 2 BORING LOGS LABORATORY TEST RESULTS LIQUEFACTION OUTPUT FILE L -PILE ANALYSIS N�AR], PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT AUTHORIZATION Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) has completed a geotechnical exploration for the proposed town home/condominium development to be located at the NWC of Via Lido and Via Malaga in Newport Beach, California. The Wieland-Davco Corp. authorized our services on August 7, 2012 by signing PSI proposal 0559-75353 dated August 1, 2012. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Mr. Justin Park of the Wieland-Davco Corp. provided the project information as described herein to PSI. Based on our discussions with Mr. Park and a review of the site plan prepared by Shusin + Donaldson Architects, Inc. for 3355 & 3388 Via Lido, we understand that new at -grade two to three story townhome/condominium buildings and associated improvements are planned to be constructed at the above mentioned addresses in Newport Beach, California. The site is presently occupied by commercial retail buildings along Via Lido (to the east) and a parking lot (to the west). The existing commercial/retail buildings and paving will be demolished to make way for the planned townhomes/condos to be constructed along the property lines and driveways and parking to be constructed between the proposed townhomes/condos. A Site Vicinity Map showing the site location is included as Figure 1 in the Appendix. Detailed structural loading has not been provided to us, however we were informed that loads for a 3 -story wood -framed residential structure on the order of 3 kips per foot for wall footings and 50 kips for columns would be reasonable assumptions. Detailed grading information has also not been provided, however, PSI has assumed that the site grading will consist of cuts and fills of less than 3 feet, not including any remedial grading. The geotechnical recommendations presented in this report are based on the available project information, site location, laboratory testing, and the subsurface materials. If any of the noted information is incorrect, please inform PSI in writing so that we may amend the recommendations presented in this report if appropriate and if desired by the client. PSI will not be responsible for the implementation of its recommendations when it is not notified of changes in the project. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of this geotechnical study was to explore the subsurface conditions and provide suitable foundation recommendations for the proposed construction. The geotechnical exploration for this project involved drilling four test borings, laboratory testing, and geotechnical analyses. This report briefly outlines the testing procedures, presents available project information, describes the site and subsurface conditions, and presents recommendations for the following: Site preparation and grading. Findings pertaining to potentially expansive, deleterious or corrosive materials. An assessment of the liquefaction potential and an estimate of seismic -induced settlements PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 1 NMS . PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA • Recommendations pertaining to design and construction of foundations for support of the proposed construction, including allowable soil bearing pressure, anticipated bearing depths and estimated settlements. • Pavement recommendations including subgrade preparation and construction control of groundwater. • Comments regarding factors that may impact construction and performance of the proposed construction. The scope of services did not include an environmental assessment for determining the presence or absence of wetlands, or hazardous or toxic materials in the soil, surface water, groundwater, or air on or below, or around this site. Any statements in this report or on the boring logs regarding odors, colors, and unusual or suspicious items or conditions are strictly for informational purposes. PSI is concurrently performing a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) at the subject site and a separate report will be issued to address environmental concerns. A geologic fault study to evaluate the possibility of surface faulting at this site was beyond the scope of this investigation. Should you desire a detailed fault study, please contact us; however, active faults are not known to exist on or in the immediate vicinity of the site. Services that investigate or detect the presence of moisture, mold, or other biological contaminants in or around any structure, or any service that was designed or intended to prevent or lower the risk of the occurrence of the amplification of the same, were not provided. Mold is ubiquitous to the environment with mold amplification occurring when building materials are impacted by moisture. Site conditions are outside of PSI's control, and mold amplification will likely occur, or continue to occur, in the presence of moisture. As such, PSI cannot be held responsible for the occurrence or recurrence of mold amplification. SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The project site is located adjacent to the NWC of Via Lido and Via Malaga in Newport Beach, California. Furnished information indicates the approximate site GPS coordinates are latitude: 34.6167°N and longitude: -117.9281°W. The subject site is currently developed with existing commercial/retail buildings along Via Lido (to the east) and a parking lot (to the west. The site is relatively level with a maximum elevation differential of about 2 feet, sloping down to the west (Google Earth, 2011). The site is triangular in shape and bounded by Via Lido to the northeast, Via Malaga to the south and Via Oporto to the west. REGIONAL GEOLOGY The subject site is located at elevations between approximately 6 to 8 feet above mean sea level (Google Earth). Based on a review of the CGS Seismic Hazard Report, Newport Quadrangle, the site is located within the Orange County coastal plain and underlain by Quaternary alluvial and fluvial sedimentary deposits. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 2 MA PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA REGIONAL SEISMICITY The project site is located in Southern California, which has undergone a complex multiphase structural history and remains an active tectonic region with documented historic earthquakes. Generally, the seismicity within California can be attributed to faulting due to regional tectonic movement. This includes the San Andreas Fault and other sub -parallel strike -slip faults, as well as normal and thrust faulting within the State. The area of the subject site is considered seismically active. Seismic hazards within the site can be attributed to potential ground shaking resulting from earthquake events along nearby or more distant faulting. The primary causes of damage in this general area during seismic events include ground shaking and liquefaction of the subsurface strata. Liquefaction occurs when loose granular and low plastic materials below the groundwater table are subjected to cyclic shear forces resulting from seismic events. During seismic shaking the porewater pressure increases with a corresponding decrease in the soils effective stress. Excess pore pressures ultimately dissipate and the soil consolidates, often resulting in significant total and differential settlement of the ground surface. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The boring locations were marked in the field by a PSI representative by referencing existing landmarks based on the information provided by the client. A truck -mounted CME -75 drill rig using mud rotary drilling methods was used to advance the borings. Soil samples were routinely obtained during the drilling process. Drilling and sampling techniques were accomplished general in accordance with ASTM procedures (ASTM D1586 and D3550). The subsurface conditions were explored by drilling four soil borings at this site. Soil borings B1 through B4, were drilled within the existing parking lot to depths ranging from approximately 20 to 50 -feet below the existing ground surface elevation. The locations of our test borings were restricted due to the existing on-site improvements. Figure 2 in the Appendix shows the approximate boring locations. The soil types encountered at the specific boring locations are presented on the attached Boring Logs in the Appendix. As indicated on our boring logs, the existing pavement section generally consists of approximately 3 inches of asphalt underlain by a silty sand with gravel (apparent base course) that was estimated to be about 6 inches thick. The pavement section was underlain by native soil consisting of medium dense silty gravely sand with trace organics that extend to a depth of approximately 5 -feet below existing grade, very soft to soft clayey silt that extends to a depth of approximately 7'/z -feet below existing grade, and loose to very dense slightly silty sand to the maximum depth explored of approximately 50 -feet below the existing ground surface elevation. During the sampling procedure, Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were performed in accordance with ASTM D1586 and relatively undisturbed samples were obtained in general accordance with ASTM D3550. The SPT for soil borings is performed by driving a 2 -inch diameter split -spoon sampler into the undisturbed formation located at the bottom of the advanced borehole with repeated blows of a 140 -pound hammer falling a vertical distance of 30 -inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler the last 12 -inches of an 18 -inch penetration depth is a measure of the soil consistency. For ASTM D-3550 (California Modified PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 3 M2, . PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA Sampler), the split barrel sampler possesses a 3 -inch O.D. and is driven in the same manner as the SPT. The blow count obtained from the California Modified sampler should be reduced by approximately 40 percent to obtain a rough correlation to SPT blow counts (N -value). Samples were identified in the field, placed in sealed containers and transported to the laboratory for further classification and testing. The stratification presented on the Boring Logs is based on a visual examination of the recovered soil samples and the interpretation of field logs by a geotechnical professional. Included on the Boring Logs are the standard penetration resistances (SPT N -values and California Modified sampler blows) recorded in the individual borings at standard testing intervals to the boring termination depths. The above subsurface information is of a generalized nature to highlight the major subsurface stratification features and material characteristics. The Boring Logs, included in the Appendix, should be reviewed for specific information at the boring locations. These records include soil descriptions, stratification, penetration resistance, locations of the samples and laboratory test data. The stratification shown on the logs represent the conditions only at the actual location at the time of our exploration. Variations may occur and should be expected between locations. The stratification that represents the approximate boundary between subsurface materials and the actual transition may be gradual. Lines of demarcation represent the approximate boundary between subsurface materials, and the transition may be gradual. It should be noted that, although the test borings are drilled and sampled by experienced professionals, it is sometimes difficult to record changes in stratification within narrow limits, especially at great depths. In the absence of foreign substances, it is also sometimes difficult to distinguish between discolored soils and clean fill soil. GROUNDWATER INFORMATION Groundwater was measured at approximately 5 -feet below existing grade in all four borings at the time of drilling. Based on a review of the California Geological Survey (CGS) Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Newport Quadrangle, the historic high groundwater depth for the site area is noted to be about 5 feet below grade. It is possible that seasonal variations (temperature, rainfall, tide conditions etc) will cause fluctuations in the groundwater level. Additionally, perched water may be encountered in discontinuous zones within the overburden. The groundwater levels presented in this report are the levels that were measured at the time of our field activities. It is recommended that the contractor determine the actual groundwater levels at the site at the time of the construction activities to determine the impact, if any, on the construction procedures. LABORATORY TESTING The soil samples obtained during the field exploration were transported to our laboratory and selected soil samples were tested in the laboratory to determine the material properties for evaluation. Laboratory testing on selected samples included Moisture Content (ASTM D2216), Unit Weight, Sieve Analysis (ASTM D422 and D1140), Expansion Index testing (ASTM D4829), Corrosion testing (CTM 643, CTM 417 and CMT 422), Atterberg Limit testing (ASTM D4318), and Consolidation (ASTM D2435). Laboratory testing was performed in general accordance PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 4 MA PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA with ASTM and/or California Test procedures. Unless otherwise informed, the soil samples will be discarded 60 days from the issuance of the report. Results of our laboratory testing indicate the tested materials have moisture contents between approximately 3 percent to 54 percent. Consolidation tests were performed on samples at depths of 7'/2 feet, 5 feet, and 10 feet below existing grade at Test Boring Nos. 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and these tests indicated the soils at 7'/z feet and 10 feet in Test Borings Nos. 1 and 3, respectively possess a relatively low compressibility. However the consolidation test performed on the soil sample at 5 -feet in Test Boring No. 2 indicated a high level of compressibility. The corrosion test results indicated the near surface soils are nearly neutral, have a low chloride content, possess a negligible sulfate exposure and resistivity results indicates the materials possess a progressively less corrosive environment for ferrous metals. The results of our Expansion Index testing indicate the near surface soils have a very low expansion potential (EI=O). Laboratory test data along with detailed descriptions of the soils can be found on the Boring Logs in the Appendix. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL The following geotechnical design recommendations have been developed on the basis of the previously described project characteristics and subsurface conditions encountered. If there are any changes in these project criteria, including building location on the site, PSI should be contacted to determine if modifications to the recommendations are warranted. EARTHQUAKE AND SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS The project site is located within a municipality that employs the 2010 California Building Code (CBC), the locally adopted version of the International Building Code, 2009 edition. As part of this code, the design of structures must consider dynamic forces resulting from seismic events. These forces are dependent upon the magnitude Of the earthquake event as well as the properties of the soils that underlie the site. As part of the procedure to evaluate seismic forces, the code requires the evaluation of the Seismic Site Class, which categorizes the site based upon the characteristics of the subsurface profile within the upper 100 feet of the ground surface. To define the Site Class for this project, we have interpreted the results of soil test borings drilled within the project site and estimated appropriate soil properties below the base of the borings to a depth of 100 feet as permitted by the code. The estimated soil properties were based upon our experience with subsurface conditions in the general site area. Based upon our evaluation, the subsurface conditions within the site are consistent with the characteristics of a Site Class "D" as defined in Table 1613.5.2 of the CBC. The associated USGS-NEHRP (2002) probabilistic ground acceleration values and site coefficients for the general site area were obtained from the USGS geohazards web page: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/hazmaps/design Which is presented in Table 1. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 5 MA PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA Table 1: Ground Motion Values* *2% Probability of Exceedence in 50 years for Latitude 33.6167°N and Longitude -117.9281'W **At B -C interface (i.e. top of bedrock). MCE = Maximum Considered Earthquake The Site Coefficients, Fa and F„ presented in the above table were also obtained from the noted USGS webpage, as a function of the site classification and mapped spectral response acceleration at the short (SS) and 1 -second (Si) periods, but can also be interpolated from CBC Tables 1613.5.3(1) and 1613.5.3(2). Hazard Assessment Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone - The seismicity of the site was evaluated utilizing deterministic methods for active faults within the regional vicinity. According to the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act of 1972 (revised 1994) faults have been classified as active faults which show apparent movement during the last 11,000 years (i.e., Holocene time). The site is not located within a currently designated Earthquake Fault Zone per the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone Map produced by the California Geological Survey (CGS). The nearest zoned active fault is the Newport — Inglewood (L.A. Basin) Fault Zone, mapped 0.4 mile to the northwest of the subject site. Lurching and Shallow Ground Rupture — Breaking of the ground because of active faulting is not likely due to the absence of known active fault traces within the project limits. Liquefaction Induced Settlement - Liquefaction and seismically induced settlement typically occur in loose granular and low -plastic silt and clay soils with groundwater near the ground surface. During an earthquake, ground shaking causes the soil to consolidate and an increase in the pore pressures in saturated soils. After dissipation of the excess pore pressures, the saturated soils tend to settle. Fine-grained plastic soils are generally not susceptible to liquefaction or to short-term settlement due to seismic loads. According to the California Geological Survey (CGS) Newport 7.5' Quadrangle hazard map, the subject site is located within an area that is classified as being susceptible to liquefaction and has a historic high groundwater depth of approximately 5 feet below existing ground surface elevation. Our borings indicate depth to groundwater was measured to be at an approximate depth of 5 feet after drilling was completed. In order to evaluate the potential for soil liquefaction at this site, we performed an analysis utilizing the LIQUEFYPRO computer software program. For this analysis, we used a groundwater depth of PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 6 rI� . Mapped MCE Adjusted MCE Design Period Spectral Site Spectral Spectral (sec) Response Coefficients Response Response Acceleration** Acceleration Acceleration 0.2 SS 1.847 Fa 1.0 SMS 1.847 SDs F1.231 1.0 S� 0.695 F 1.5 SM 1.042 SDI 1 0.695 *2% Probability of Exceedence in 50 years for Latitude 33.6167°N and Longitude -117.9281'W **At B -C interface (i.e. top of bedrock). MCE = Maximum Considered Earthquake The Site Coefficients, Fa and F„ presented in the above table were also obtained from the noted USGS webpage, as a function of the site classification and mapped spectral response acceleration at the short (SS) and 1 -second (Si) periods, but can also be interpolated from CBC Tables 1613.5.3(1) and 1613.5.3(2). Hazard Assessment Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone - The seismicity of the site was evaluated utilizing deterministic methods for active faults within the regional vicinity. According to the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act of 1972 (revised 1994) faults have been classified as active faults which show apparent movement during the last 11,000 years (i.e., Holocene time). The site is not located within a currently designated Earthquake Fault Zone per the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone Map produced by the California Geological Survey (CGS). The nearest zoned active fault is the Newport — Inglewood (L.A. Basin) Fault Zone, mapped 0.4 mile to the northwest of the subject site. Lurching and Shallow Ground Rupture — Breaking of the ground because of active faulting is not likely due to the absence of known active fault traces within the project limits. Liquefaction Induced Settlement - Liquefaction and seismically induced settlement typically occur in loose granular and low -plastic silt and clay soils with groundwater near the ground surface. During an earthquake, ground shaking causes the soil to consolidate and an increase in the pore pressures in saturated soils. After dissipation of the excess pore pressures, the saturated soils tend to settle. Fine-grained plastic soils are generally not susceptible to liquefaction or to short-term settlement due to seismic loads. According to the California Geological Survey (CGS) Newport 7.5' Quadrangle hazard map, the subject site is located within an area that is classified as being susceptible to liquefaction and has a historic high groundwater depth of approximately 5 feet below existing ground surface elevation. Our borings indicate depth to groundwater was measured to be at an approximate depth of 5 feet after drilling was completed. In order to evaluate the potential for soil liquefaction at this site, we performed an analysis utilizing the LIQUEFYPRO computer software program. For this analysis, we used a groundwater depth of PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 6 rI� . PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 5 feet (historic high), the soil profile identified in Boring B-1 and a ground acceleration of 0.5g (SDs/2.5, as per the CBC).The results of our analysis indicates that localized zones of the silty sand soils are potentially susceptible to liquefaction upon application of the design site acceleration. Our analysis indicates that the sandy soils between about 7'/z to 10 feet, 26 to 28 feet, and 29 to 30 feet below grade are potentially susceptible to liquefaction upon application of the design earthquake. The most significant effect of soil liquefaction is expected to be ground surface settlement resulting from volumetric strain within the liquefiable soils. Based on our analysis, we estimate a maximum total seismic induced settlement of approximately 1-% inches with an estimated % inch of differential settlement across a 40 foot span. Based on this magnitude of estimated settlement, it is our opinion that mitigation of the liquefaction potential is not warranted. The output file from the analysis is provided within the Appendix. Landslidino — Due to the generally flat nature of the site and surrounding properties, it is our opinion that the site has a low susceptibility to landslides. Tsunamis and Seiches — Based on our review of the Tsunami Inundation Map for Emergency Planning, Newport Beach Quadrangle, dated March 15, 2009, issued by the State of California - Orange County, the site is located within a designated tsunami inundation area. As such the potential does exist for tsunami inundation to impact the site. For Seismic Design Category designations of C, D, E or F, which are contingent on the structures "Seismic Use Group', the code requires an assessment of slope stability, liquefaction potential and surface rupture due to faulting or lateral spreading. Detailed evaluations of these factors were beyond the scope of this study. However, the following table presents a qualitative assessment of these issues considering the site class, the subsurface soil properties, the groundwater elevation and probabilistic ground motions. Table 2: Qualitative Seismic Site Assessments Hazard Relative Risk Comments Liquefaction Moderate Differential seismic induced settlement of about 2/3 inch is estimated across a 40 foot span. Slope Stability Low Based on the presumed grading plans, significant cut or fill slopes are not planned for construction. Surface Rupture Low Active faults are not known to underlie the site. SITE PREPARATION $ GRADING The current geotechnical issues at the site that will affect the construction of the proposed development include the following: 1. Surface and subsurface disturbance during clearing and demolition operations. 2. Shallow groundwater. 3. Potentially liquefiable soils. 4. Soft soil deposits which will require the use of a deep foundation system. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 7 MA PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA Site Preparation Initial site preparation should include stripping of any vegetation, demolition of the existing buildings and removal of the existing pavement that is present within the planned new development areas. Demolition of the existing buildings should include removal of all shallow foundations, floor slabs and underground construction. Existing underground utilities should either be properly capped off at the property boundaries and removed or be re-routed around the new development. Utilities should be removed and properly abandoned in accordance with local regulatory requirements. All soils disturbed by the clearing and demolition operations should be removed, cleaned of deleterious materials and stockpiled on-site for future use as Engineered Fill. All debris and deleterious materials generated by the site stripping and demolition operations should be legally disposed off-site. If the existing buildings are supported by deep foundations, we recommend that the deep foundations be cut-off at least 3 feet below finished grade and to a depth where they will not impact construction of the new foundations. If grading occurs in the winter rainy season, unstable subgrade conditions may be present. These conditions may require stabilizing the subgrade with admixtures, such as cement kiln dust or a coarse aggregate. Isolated areas may be stabilized using a geogrid, such as Tensar TX160 or equal, with one foot compacted Class II aggregate base over the geogrid. Additional recommendations can be provided, as required, during construction. Remedial Grading Following site clearing, demolition and lowering of site grades where needed, we recommend that the soils beneath the new buildings be over -excavated to a depth of at least two feet below existing or finished grade, whichever is deeper. The exposed soils should then be scarified to a depth of approximately 12 inches, be moisture conditioned to about 0 to 3 percent above the soil's optimum moisture content and then be compacted to at least 90 percent of the soil's maximum dry density, per ASTM D-1557. The subgrade within all other development areas of site should be proof rolled with a heavy rubber - tired piece of construction equipment approved by and in the presence of the Geotechnical Engineer. Any soil that ruts or excessively deflects during proof rolling should be removed or stabilized as recommended by the Geotechnical Engineer. Due to the presence of shallow groundwater, some unstable soil requiring removal or stabilization should be expected. The soils exposed at the base of all excavations should be scarified to a depth of at least 12 inches, be moisture conditioned to about 0 to 3 percent above the soil's optimum moisture and compacted to at least 90 percent of the soil's maximum dry density, per ASTM D-1557. However, the top 12 - inches of the pavement subgrade should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the modified Proctor value (ASTM D-1557). Site grades may then be raised with low expansive Engineered Fill to achieve the design elevations at the site. A PSI representative should be on-site during site grading to evaluate the degree of compaction obtained by the contractor. Engineered Fill Engineered Fill material beneath the proposed exterior slabs to support the generators should PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 8 rI� . PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA not contain rocks greater than 3 -inches in diameter or greater than 30 percent retained on the '/4 -inch sieve, and should not contain more than 3 percent (by weight) of organic matter or other unsuitable material. The Expansion Index (EI) for the material should not exceed 40. Based on our subsurface investigation, existing on-site sandy soils are generally suitable for use as Engineered Fill; however, this should be confirmed by a PSI representative during grading. Import materials meeting the above requirements should be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer prior to use as Engineered Fill. The on-site clayey silt soils are not considered suitable for use as Engineered Fill beneath surface improvements. Engineered Fill should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the modified Proctor (ASTM D1557). The moisture content of Engineered Fill should be maintained at approximately 0 to 3 percent above the material's optimum moisture content as determined by the same index during compaction. If the Engineered Fill is too dry, water should be uniformly applied across the affected fill area. If the Engineered Fill is too wet, it must be dried. In either event, the Engineered Fill should be thoroughly mixed by disking to obtain relatively uniform moisture content throughout the lift immediately prior to compaction. Engineered Fill should be placed in maximum lifts of 8 -inches of loose material. Each lift of Engineered Fill should be tested by a PSI soils technician, working under the direction of our Project Geotechnical Engineer, prior to placement of subsequent lifts. Compaction of the backfill should be checked with a sufficient number of density tests by a representative of the Geotechnical Engineer to determine if adequate compaction is being achieved by the contractor. The properly compacted Engineered Fill should extend horizontally outward beyond the exterior perimeter of the foundations a distance equal to the height of fill or 5 -feet, whichever is greater, prior to significant sloping. TEMPORARY EXCAVATION CONSIDERATIONS In Federal Register Volume 54, No. 209 (October, 1989), the United States Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) amended its "Construction Standards for Excavations, 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P." This document was issued to insure better the safety of workers entering trenches or excavations. It is mandated by this federal regulation that all excavations, whether they be utility trenches, basement excavations, or footing excavations, be construction in accordance with the reviewed OSHA guidelines. It is our understanding that these regulations are being strictly enforced and if they are not closely followed, the owner and the contractor could be liable for substantial penalties. The contractor is solely responsible for designing and constructing stable, temporary excavations and should shore, slope, or bench the sides of the excavations as required to maintain stability of both the excavation sides and bottom. The contractor's responsible person, as defined in 29 CFR Part 1926, should evaluate the soil exposed in the excavations as part of the contractor's safety procedures. In no case should slope height, slope inclination, or excavation depth, including utility trench excavation depth, exceed those specified in local, state, and federal safety regulations. We are providing this information solely as a service to our client. PSI is not assuming responsibility for construction site safety or the contractor's activities; such responsibility is not PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 9 MA PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA being implied and should not be inferred. DEEP FOUNDATIONS Due to the presence of the soft and compressible soils at a depth of about 5 feet below grade and the shallow water table, it is our opinion that the proposed buildings should be supported by a deep foundation system that extends through the soft soil deposits and the potentially liquefiable soils and be supported within the underlying medium dense to dense sandy soil deposits. The deep foundation system may consist of cast in-place drilled piers (CIDH), driven pile, auger -cast piles or other propriety systems. We are providing recommendations for CIDH but other systems can be used and PSI can provide supplemental recommendations as needed. CIDH should possess a minimum diameter of 24 inches. Our analysis included a factor of safety of 2 for skin friction and 3 for end bearing. In our analysis, we conservatively assumed that the soils to a depth of 10 feet had no load -carrying capacity (skin friction of zero). Additionally, drag load (negative skin friction) resulting from potential soil liquefaction has been included in the CIDH capacities provided below. Based on our analysis, we anticipate that the drilled piers will have the allowable axial capacities as indicated on the following Table 3 for the various pile lengths noted. Table 3: Allowable CIDH Axial Capacities Versus Depth* CIDH Tip Depth 24 In. Diam.- CIDH 15 Feet 25 Kips 25 Feet 60 Kips 35 Feet 100 Kips *Minimum depth of 15 feet recommended CIDH may be installed on a spacing of 3 pier diameters (center to center) with no reduction in capacity for group effects. CIDH capacities for compressive and uplift loading may be increased by'/ for temporary wind and/or seismic loading conditions. For uplift resistance, we recommend the capacity be based on an average allowable unit skin friction value of 500 psf within the soils below a depth of 10 feet. The upper 10 feet of soil should be neglected in calculating the uplift resistance. We estimate settlement at the base of the CIDH for the design load will be less than % inch. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 10 MA PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA Detailed inspection of CIDH construction should be made to verify that the CIDHs are vertical and founded in the proper bearing stratum, and to verify that all loose materials have been removed prior to concrete placement. Due to the presence of shallow groundwater and sandy soils, temporary casing is recommended to limit sloughing of soil and groundwater intrusion into the drilled shafts. Any accumulated water must be removed prior to the placement of concrete. A hopper and tremie should be utilized during concrete placement to control the maximum free fall of the wet concrete to less than five feet unless the mix is designed so that it does not segregate during free fall and provided the pier excavation is dry. Temporary casing may be removed as the concrete is placed into the drilled shaft keeping a concrete head of at least two feet above the bottom of the casing as it is being removed. Shafts should be clean and be free of all loose materials prior to placement of concrete. The drilled shafts should be installed in accordance with the guidelines provided in FHWA-IF-99-025. A PSI representative should verify the bearing stratum, bearing depth, bearing soil condition, and bearing area and that the pier installation procedures meet the specifications. LATERAL CAPACITIES To assess the deflection, moment and shear capacity of the CIDH piers, the computer software program L -Pile by Ensoft, Inc. was utilized. The analyses were performed for a 24 inch diameter CIDH pier for varying lengths. For the analyses, the bottom of the pile cap was assumed to be at finished grade (no pile cap). Lateral capacities were developed for both free and fixed -head pile conditions. In our analysis, we assumed the soil within the upper 10 feet of grade will have no lateral support capacity. The computer output files for those analyses are included within the Appendix. Once the specific foundation type, dimensions and structural detailing is known, the lateral pile capacities can be re-evaluated. INTERIOR FLOOR SLABS The proposed structures may incorporate a conventional slab -on -grade provided the subgrade is prepared as previously recommended. The on -grade floor slabs should be supported on Engineered Fill. Soft or otherwise unsuitable areas observed should be addressed on a case- by-case basis by our Geotechnical Engineer. Although the slab thickness and steel reinforcement should be determined by the structural engineer, we recommend the floor slab possess a minimum thickness of 5 inches. Where concrete slabs are designed as beams on an elastic foundation, the subgrade should be assumed to have a modulus of subgrade reaction (k -value) of 150 pounds per cubic inch (pci), based on a one foot square plate bearing test. Dependent on how the floor slab load is applied, the above subgrade modulus value may need to be geometrically adjusted. If reducing moisture vapor transmission is a design consideration, we would recommend a vapor retarding membrane be included in the design. Membrane specification should be provided by manufacturer. Vapor retarders should be installed in accordance with ACI 302.1, Chapter 3. A capillary break material (sand) should be provided beneath the vapor retarder. The precautions listed below should be followed closely for construction of all slabs -on -grade. These details will not reduce the amount of movement, but are intended to reduce potential PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 11 MA PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA damage should some settlement of the supporting subgrade take place. Cracking of slabs -on -grade is normal and should be expected. Cracking can occur not only because of heaving or compression of the supporting soil, but also because of concrete curing stresses. The occurrence of concrete shrinkage cracks, and problems associated with concrete curing may be reduced and/or controlled by limiting the water/cement ratio of the concrete, proper concrete placement, finishing, and curing, and by the placement of crack control joints at frequent intervals, particularly, where re-entrant slab corners occur. The American Concrete Institute (ACI) recommends a maximum panel size (in feet) equal to approximately three times the thickness of the slab (in inches) in both directions. For example, joints are recommended at a maximum spacing of 12 feet, assuming a four -inch thick slab. We recommend also that control joints be scored three feet in from, and parallel to, the foundation walls. Using fiber reinforcement in the concrete can also control shrinkage cracking. Some increase in moisture content is inevitable because of development and associated landscaping. However, extreme moisture content increases can be largely controlled by proper and responsible site drainage, building maintenance and irrigation practices. Exterior slabs should be isolated from the building. These slabs should be reinforced to function as independent units. Movement of these slabs should not be transmitted to the building foundation or superstructure. PAVEMENT DESIGN The recommended thicknesses presented below are considered typical and minimum for the assumed parameters. We understand that budgetary considerations sometimes warrant thinner pavement sections than those presented. However, the client, the owner, and the project principals should be aware that thinner pavement sections might result in increased maintenance costs and lower than anticipated pavement life. In designing the proposed paved areas, the existing subgrade conditions must be considered together with the expected traffic use and loading conditions. The conditions that will influence the pavement design can be summarized as follows: 1) Subgrade support characteristics of the subgrade. This is typically represented by a R - Value for the design of flexible pavements in this region. 2) Vehicular traffic, in terms of the number and frequency of vehicles and their range of axle loads. 3) Probable increase in vehicular use over the life of the pavement. We recommend that the exposed subgrade be prepared in accordance with the site preparation requirements specified previously in this report. The upper one foot of pavement subgrade should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the modified Proctor (ASTM D1557). The fill moisture content at the time of compaction should be within 1 to 3 percent above the optimum moisture content value. Undercut soil should be PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 12 Mme, . PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA replaced by Engineered Fill. The appropriate pavement section depends primarily upon the type of subgrade soil, shear strength, traffic load, and planned pavement life. For preliminary purposes, we have assumed Traffic Indices of TI=5.0 for parking areas and TI=6.5 for those driveway and truck lanes subject to relatively heavy traffic. These assumed traffic indices should be verified by the project civil engineer prior to construction. Based on the soils encountered within our test borings, we have assumed an R -value of 30 for the near -surface soils within pavement areas. Since an evaluation of the characteristics of the actual soils at pavement subgrade can only be provided at the completion of grading, the following pavement sections should be used for planning purposes only. Final pavement designs should be evaluated after R -value tests have been performed on the actual subgrade material. It should be noted that additional earthwork and/or ground improvement efforts may be required during grading on the actual subgrade material, in order to achieve the aforementioned design parameters and assumptions. These design thicknesses assume that a properly prepared subgrade has been achieved. Table 4: Flexible Pavement Recommendations Pavement Assumed Recommended Pavement Loading Traffic Section Conditions Index Standard Duty 5.0 3 inches AC over 6 -inches (Parking Areas) Class 11 Aggregate Base Heavy Duty 6"5 4 inches AC over 8 -inches (Drive Aisles) Class II Aggregate Base Concrete pavement is recommended in areas that receive continuous repetitive traffic such as loading areas and parking lot entrances. Due to heavy wheel loads and impact loads, concrete approach aprons and dumpster pads, should have a minimum thickness of 6 inches, with an underlying 4 -inch thick section of Class II Aggregate Base (AB). Portland Cement Concrete pavement sections should incorporate appropriate steel reinforcement and crack control joints as designed by the project structural engineer. We recommend that sections be as nearly squared as possible and no more than 15 -feet on a side. A minimum 3,500 psi mix is recommended. The actual design should also be in accordance with design criteria specified by the governing jurisdiction. Asphalt Concrete (AC), Portland Cement Concrete, and Class II aggregate base should conform to and be placed in accordance with the latest revision of the California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications and American Concrete Institute (ACI) codes. Aggregate base should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the modified Proctor (ASTM D1557) prior to placement of AC. Subgrade preparation for pavement areas is included in the Site Preparation section of this report. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 13 MA PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS Moisture Sensitive Soils/Weather Related Concerns Note that the upper soils are sensitive to disturbances caused by construction traffic and to changes in moisture content. During wet weather periods, increases in the moisture content of the soil can cause significant reduction in the soil strength and support capabilities. Furthermore, perched groundwater conditions can develop during periods of heavy rainfall as a result of less permeable layers impeding infiltration. In these instances, overlying subgrade soils may become unstable and require remedial measures. It will, therefore, be advantageous to perform earthwork and foundation construction activities during dry weather. Groundwater was measured to be approximately 5 -feet below existing ground surface elevation. It should be noted, however, that variations in the groundwater table may result from fluctuation in the ground surface topography, subsurface stratification, precipitation, irrigation, and other factors that may not have evident at the time of our exploration. This sometimes occurs where relatively impermeable and/or cemented materials are overlain by fill soils. We recommend that a representative of PSI be present during grading operations to evaluate areas of seepage. Drainage devices for reduction of water accumulation can be recommended if these conditions occur. Water should not be allowed to collect in the foundation excavation, on floor slab areas, or on prepared subgrades of the construction area either during or after construction. Undercut or excavated areas should be sloped toward one corner to facilitate removal of any collected rainwater, groundwater, or surface runoff. Positive site drainage should be provided to reduce infiltration of surface water around the perimeter of the building and beneath the floor slabs. The grades should be sloped away from the building and surface drainage should be collected and discharged such that water is not permitted to infiltrate the backfill and floor slab areas of the building. Corrosive Soil Concerns The corrosive testing on a representative sample of the site soils indicates that the soils possess a negligible sulfate exposure. Based on this result, it is our opinion that special sulfate - resistant concrete mix designs are not warranted and Type II cement may be used. Additional testing should be performed during site grading to assess the sulfate content of the as -graded soils. The resistivity results indicate a progressively less corrosive environment for metal pipes. We suggest that a corrosion engineer be consulted to determine what corrosion protection may be warranted at this site. PLAN REVIEW Once final design plans and specifications are available, a review of grading and foundation plans by PSI is recommended as a means to check that the evaluations made in preparation of this report are correct and that earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 14 MA PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI REPORT 0559771 NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA AUGUST 24, 2012 NEWPORT BEACH, CA OBSERVATION AND TESTING DURING CONSTRUCTION It is recommended that PSI be retained to provide observation and testing services during for newly proposed construction. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications and recommendations, and to allow for possible changes in the event that subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. REPORT LIMITATIONS The proposed professional services have been performed, findings obtained, and recommendations prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices at the time of this report. PSI is not responsible for the conclusions, opinions, or recommendations made by others based on this data. No other warranties are implied or expressed. The Wieland-Davco Corp., its subsidiaries and affiliates can rely upon the report under the same terms as if it was originally prepared for them. The scope of exploration was intended to evaluate soil conditions within the influence of the proposed foundations. The analyses and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the soil borings performed at the locations indicated. If any subsoil variations become evident during the course of this project, a re-evaluation of the recommendations contained in this report will be necessary after we have had an opportunity to observe the characteristics of the conditions encountered. The applicability of the report should also be reviewed in the event significant changes occur in the design, nature, or location of the proposed improvements. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 15 MA PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS NWC VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA NEWPORT BEACH, CA APPENDIX PSI REPORT 0559771 AUGUST 24, 2012 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. PAGE 16 MA iOPO! map printed on 08/23/12 from 'Untitled,tpo" 0 5 I IN NATIONAL "" r1211 GEOGRAPHIC 5 X lkI MISS OE/23/12 Information PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI / W X71 b DATE: NWC OF VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA PROJECT — To Build On 8/23/12 � Ji 1 NUMBER: �� '• tP o W. Ning�RJ' �, c 6330 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE B BY: ZM SITE VICINITY MAP SUBJECT CYPRESS, CALIFORNIA �Ojh _ e _ e 1 �Jr -F..'S a 4eutel St^ — mi er St �' eIN St ; 4 e �.. SS, •�' � a W •` ; 4%n b'f {... 4` lyY�t�T. l � /3i tent t "'caw Aa N� ;.,teem �� comm; V4` NEWPORT BEACF I�� Pna.D ;.S011nnatD, P i H Sr e 2 f16 y. �k s -.IS Be ¢dNew 14vf^ CDaYgyy,,lt. 41 _. ach } q`le. 4 FOrn 2 0 5 I IN NATIONAL "" r1211 GEOGRAPHIC 5 X lkI MISS OE/23/12 Information PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI / W X71 b DATE: NWC OF VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA PROJECT — To Build On 8/23/12 � Ji 1 NUMBER: �� '• tP o W. Ning�RJ' �, c 6330 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE B BY: ZM SITE VICINITY MAP SUBJECT CYPRESS, CALIFORNIA SITE° lyY�t�T. l � /3i tent t "'caw Aa N� ;.,teem �� comm; Nis _ Ij+ 34 ` ° F `wo p�R7 a NEWPORT BEACF .,,,ro;v Wgah wB y Be ¢dNew 14vf^ CDaYgyy,,lt. 41 _. ach } q`le. 4 FOrn ?yA/r 2 Map created 10it190M ©2010 Na" Ge grap*; ©2007 Tee Atlas, Rd. 1/2007 l 17-57 000' W 117- 6A M0' W 117 -SS nn0' W W[;SR4117^54 Alin. W 0 5 I IN NATIONAL "" r1211 GEOGRAPHIC 5 X lkI MISS OE/23/12 Information PROPOSED TOWNHOMES/CONDOS PSI / W X71 b DATE: NWC OF VIA LIDO & VIA MALAGA PROJECT — To Build On 8/23/12 IRVINE, CA NUMBER: Engineering a Consulting a Testing 0559771 PSI, INC. DRAWN FIGURE 6330 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE B BY: ZM SITE VICINITY MAP CYPRESS, CALIFORNIA rofessional Service Industries, Inc. Gateway Drive, Suite B Cypress, Cypress, CA 90630 LOG OF BORING B1 =,W Telephone: (714)484-8600 Fax: 714 484-8601 Sheet 1 of 2 PSI Job No.: 0559771 Drilling Method: Mud Rotary WATER LEVELS Project: Proposed Townhome/Condo Development Sampling Method:2-in SS 1: While Drilling feet Location: NWC Via Malaga 8 Via Lido Hammer Type: Automatic 1 Upon Completion 5 feet Newport Beach, CA Boring Location: T Delay N/A Station: N/A STANDARD PENETRATION ^� Offset: N/A o t TEST DATA M 6 =e N in blowsift O o t s d Z a MATERIAL DESCRIPTION tO g m = X Moisture 0 t PL LL Additional "> E E z ° n Remarks o y 3 W STRENGTH, tsf m ♦ Ou X Op (1 ASPHALT, 3 inches � 0 ° 4.0 Silty SAND, light brown, damp i SM 1Apparent Base I Silty SAND with Grave) trace organics, light to dark brown, wet, medium dense SM 9 X DD - 128 pd 1 18 14/15/22 N=37 5 Sandy GRAVEL, light to dark brown, C)° 2 6 subangular gravel sand mixture, trace 5/7/12 o p organics GW N=19 O SiltySAND, trace gravel, trace organics, 30 X DD = 93 pcf 3 18 grey-brown, wet, loose 1/3/6 0 N=9 10 medium dense 4 18 7/13/18 0 N=31 15 Fines=6.0 5 18 6/8/9 0 N=17 -20- 6 18 8/12/15 ° N=27 25 Fines=5.1 7 18 7/7/11 a N=18 M!S 30 Continued Next Page Completion Depth: 51.5 It Sample Types: Shelby Tube Latitude: 33.616706° Date Boring Started: 8/13/12 Auger Cutting Hand Auger Longitude: -117.928053° Drill Rig: CME 75 Date Boring Completed: 8/13/12 Split-Spoon Calif. Sampler Remarks: Logged By: ZM Drilling Contractor: Cal-Pac Rock Core Texas Cone The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. rofessional Service Industries, Inc. Gateway Drive, Suite B Cypress, Cypress, CA 90630 LOG OF BORING B1 =,W Telephone: (714)484-8600 Fax: 714 484-8601 Sheet 2 of 2 PSI Job No.: 0559771 Drilling Method: Mud Rotary WATER LEVELS Project: Proposed Townhome/Condo Development Sampling Method:2-in SS 1: While Drilling feet Location: NWC Via Malaga 8 Via Lido Hammer Type: Automatic 1 Upon Completion 5 feet Newport Beach, CA Boring Location: T Delay N/A Station: N/A STANDARD PENETRATION ^� Offset: N/A o t TEST DATA M 6 =e N in blows/ft o0 o ru t J s t- d Z a MATERIAL DESCRIPTION tO g m = X Moisture 0 t PL LL Additional "> E E z ° n Remarks o y 3 W STRENGTH, tsf ♦ Qu X Qp 30 Silty SAND, trace gravel, trace organics, 0 ° 4.0 8 18 grey -brown, wet, loose 13/19/26 a dense N=45 -35- 9 18 14/18/23 ,o N=41 40 Fines=5.00 10 18 10/15/20 N=35 45 very dense 11 18 17/26/36 » N=62 50 dense 12 18 16/22/16 N=38 Boring Terminated at 51.5 feet Groundwatermeasured at approximately 5 It after drilling Boring backfilled with bentonite and capped with asphalt Completion Depth: 51.5 ftJfRock ple Types: Shelby Tube Latitude: 33.616706° Date Boring Started: 8/13/12uger Cutting Hand Auger Longitude: -117.928053° Drill Rig: CME 75 Date Boring Completed: 8/13/12 plit-Spoon Calif. Sampler Remarks: Logged By: ZM Drillin Contractor: Cal-Pac Core Texas Cone The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. rofessional Service Industries, Inc. Gateway Drive, Suite B Cypress, =MWIF Cypress, CA 90630 LOG OF BORING B2 Telephone: (714)484-8600 Fax: 714 484-8601 Sheet 1 of 2 PSI Job No.: 0559771 Drilling Method: Mud Rotary WATER LEVELS Project: Proposed Townhome/Condo Development Sampling Method:2-in SS � While Drilling feet Location: NWC Via Malaga 8 Via Lido Hammer Type: Automatic 1 Upon Completion 5 feet Newport Beach, CA Boring Location: T Delay N/A Station: N/A STANDARD PENETRATION ^� Offset: N/A o t TEST DATA M 6 = e N in blowsift O o t s d Z a MATERIAL DESCRIPTION tO g m = X Moisture 0 t PL LL Additional "> E E z ° n Remarks o y 3 W STRENGTH, taf m ♦ Ou X Op D ASPHALT, 3 inches 0 0 4.a Silty SAND, trace gravels, light brown, moist i SM Apparent Base _ _I Silty SAND, trace organics,liight to dark brown, wet, medium dense SM 9 X DD = 99 pcf 1 18 7/8/9 ° N=17 5 Clayey SILT, trace organics, grey -brown, 54 Do = 61 pcf 2 18 wet, very soft 2/1/1 0 MH N=2 Silty SAND, trace organics, grey -brown, wet, Fines=8.8% 3 18 medium dense 3/5/10 ° N=15 4 25 DD = 102 pcf 4 18 5/10/16 Fines=10.1 N=26 _15- 55 5 18 6/7/9 N=16 M/S -20- 06 6 18 8/8/11 N=19 -25- 57 7 18 7/12116 a N=28 30 Continued Next Page Completion Depth: 31.5 It Sample Types: Shelby Tube Latitude: 33.616706° Date Boring Started: 8/13/12 Auger Cutting Hand Auger Longitude: -117.928053° Drill Rig: CME 75 Date Boring Completed: 8/13/12 Split -Spoon Calif. Sampler Remarks: Logged By: ZM Drilling Contractor: Cal-Pac Rock Core Texas Cone The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. rofessional Service Industries, Inc. Gateway Drive, Suite B Cypress, Cypress, CA 90630 LOG OF BORING B2 =,W Telephone: (714)484-8600 Fax: 714 484-8601 Sheet 2 of 2 PSI Job No.: 0559771 Drilling Method: Mud Rotary WATER LEVELS Project: Proposed Townhome/Condo Development Sampling Method:2-in SS 1: While Drilling feet Location: NWC Via Malaga 8 Via Lido Hammer Type: Automatic 1 Upon Completion 5 feet Newport Beach, CA Boring Location: T Delay N/A Station: N/A STANDARD PENETRATION ^� Offset: N/A o t TEST DATA M 6 =e N in blows/ft o0 o ru t J s t- d Z a MATERIAL DESCRIPTION tO g m X Moisture 0 t PL LL Additional "> E E z ° n Remarks O V) N0 o y 3 W W of STRENGTH, tsf ♦ Qu X Qp 30 Silty SAND, trace organics, grey -brown, wet, 0 ° 4.01 8 18 medium dense 13/16/16 0 dense N=32 Boring Terminated at 31.5 ft Groundwater measured at approximately 5 ft after drilling Boring backfilled with bentonite and capped with ashpalt Completion Depth: 31.5 It Sample Types: Shelby Tube Latitude: 33.616706° Date Boring Started: 8/13/12 Auger Cutting Hand Auger Longitude: -117.928053° Drill Rig: CME 75 Date Boring Completed: 8/13/12 Split -Spoon Calif. Sampler Remarks: Logged By: ZM Drilling Contractor: Cal-Pac Rock Core Texas Cone The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. Professional Service Industries, Inc. - Gateway Drive, Suite B Cypress, CA 90630 LOG OF BORING B3 Telephone: (714)484-8600 Fax: 714 484-8601 Sheet 1 of 2 PSI Job No.: 0559771 Drilling Method: Mud Rotary WATER LEVELS Project: Proposed Townhome/Condo Development Sampling Method:2-in SS 1: While Drilling feet Location: NWC Via Malaga 8 Via Lido Hammer Type: Automatic 1 Upon Completion 5 feet Newport Beach, CA Boring Location: T Delay N/A Station: N/A STANDARD PENETRATION ^� Offset: N/A o t TEST DATA M 6 =e N in blowsift O o t s d Z a MATERIAL DESCRIPTION tO g m = X Moisture 0 t PL LL Additional "> E E z ° n Remarks o y 3 W STRENGTH, taf m ♦ Ou X Op D ASPHALT, 3 inches o 0 4.0 Silty SAND, trace gravels, light brown, moist i SM Apparent Base _ _I Silty SAND, trace organics,liight to dark brown, wet, loose SM 3 X DD = 105 pcf 1 18 5/5/6 N=11 5 85 DD = 68 pcf Clayey SILT, trace organics, grey -brown, L = 66 2 18 very soft 1/1/1 o PL=34 MH N=2 Silty SAND, trace organics, grey -brown, wet, 32 X DD = 93 pcf 3 18 medium dense 3/8/10 a N=18 10 20 Do = 109 pcf 4 18 4/9/15 N=24 _15- 55 5 18 6/8/10 a N=18 M/S -20- 06 6 18 7/8115 0 N=23 _25- 57 7 18 8/13114 0 N=27 30 Continued Next Page Completion Depth: 31.5 It Sample Types: Shelby Tube Latitude: 33.616706° Date Boring Started: 8/13/12 Auger Cutting Hand Auger Longitude: -117.928053° Drill Rig: CME 75 Date Boring Completed: 8/13/12 Split -Spoon Calif. Sampler Remarks: Logged By: ZM Drilling Contractor: Cal-Pac Rock Core Texas Cone The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. rofessional Service Industries, Inc. Gateway Drive, Suite B Cypress, Cypress, CA 90630 LOG OF BORING B3 =,W Telephone: (714)484-8600 Fax: 714 484-8601 Sheet 2 of 2 PSI Job No.: 0559771 Drilling Method: Mud Rotary WATER LEVELS Project: Proposed Townhome/Condo Development Sampling Method:2-in SS 1: While Drilling feet Location: NWC Via Malaga 8 Via Lido Hammer Type: Automatic 1 Upon Completion 5 feet Newport Beach, CA Boring Location: T Delay N/A Station: N/A STANDARD PENETRATION ^� Offset: N/A o t TEST DATA M 6 =e N in blows/ft o0 o ru t J s t- d Z a MATERIAL DESCRIPTION tO g m X Moisture 0 PL t LL Additional "> E E z ° n Remarks O V) N0 o y 3 W W of STRENGTH, tsf ♦ Qu X Qp 0 ° 4.01 30 Silty SAND, trace organics, grey -brown, wet, 8 18 medium dense 11/16/17 0 dense N=33 Boring Terminated at 31.5 ft Groundwater measured at approximately 5 ft after drilling Boring backfilled with bentonite and capped with asphalt Completion Depth: 31.5 It Sample Types: Shelby Tube Latitude: 33.616706° Date Boring Started: 8/13/12 Auger Cutting Hand Auger Longitude: -117.928053° Drill Rig: CME 75 Date Boring Completed: 8/13/12 Split -Spoon Calif. Sampler Remarks: Logged By: ZM Drilling Contractor: Cal-Pac Rock Core Texas Cone The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. Professional Service Industries, Inc. - Gateway Drive, Suite B Cypress, CA 90630 LOG OF BORING B4 Telephone: (714)484-8600 Fax: 714 484-8601 Sheet 1 of 1 PSI Job No.: 0559771 Drilling Method: Mud Rotary WATER LEVELS Project: Proposed Townhome/Condo Development Sampling Method:2-in SS 1: While Drilling feet Location: NWC Via Malaga 8 Via Lido Hammer Type: Automatic 1 Upon Completion 5 feet Newport Beach, CA Boring Location: T Delay N/A Station: N/A STANDARD PENETRATION ^� Offset: N/A o t TEST DATA M 6 =e N in blows/ft o0 o ru t J s t- d Z a MATERIAL DESCRIPTION tO g m = X Moisture 0 t PL LL Additional "> E E z ° n Remarks o y 3 W STRENGTH, taf m ♦ Ou X Op 0 ASPHALT, 3 inches 0 ° 4.0 Silty SANQ trace gravels, light brown, moist i SM Apparent Base _ _I Silty SAND, trace organics,liight to dark brown, wet, loose SM 16 X DD = 93 pcf 1 18 6/7/8 ° N=15 5 Clayey SILT, trace organics, grey-brown, 87 D D = 59 pcf 2 18 wet, soft 1/2/3 ° MH N=5 Silty SANQ trace organics, grey-brown, wet, 31 X DD = sz pcf 3 18 loose 4/5/5 ° N=10 10 medium dense 4 18 11/18/20 ID N=38 M/S 15 loose 5 18 4/4/5 0 N=9 20 medium dense 6 18 6111113 N=24 Boring Terminated at 21.5 ft Groundwater measured at approximately 5 ft after drilling Boring backfilled with bentonite and capped with asphalt Completion Depth: 21.5 It Sample Types: Shelby Tube Latitude: 33.616706° Date Boring Started: 8/13/12 Auger Cutting Hand Auger Longitude: -117.928053° Drill Rig: CME 75 Date Boring Completed: 8/13/12 Split-Spoon Calif. Sampler Remarks: Logged By: ZM Drilling Contractor: Cal-Pac Rock Core Texas Cone The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. CONSOLIDATION TEST - ASTM D2435 PSI # 553779 Job No. 2008-026 Boring Sample No. • Date 08-15-12 •' '��w!!�1� , . ■■■■■�II�■■■■■111 . ■■■■■�11�►�7�■w■�II�■■■■■III �■■■■■�11���■�f��11�■■■■■III ' . ' ' . �■■■■■�11�■f■■■SII III III o"Submerged SII III �■■■■■�11�■■■■■�11 ■■■■■�11�■■■■■SIIIII �■■■■■�11�■■■■■�11 �■■■■■�11�■■■■■SII �■■■■■�II�■■■■■�11�■■■■■III .. �■■■■■�11�■■■■■�II�■■■■■III �■■■■■�11�■■■■■�11�■■■■■III .■■r--'"---m"2■111�■■■■■III ' ' , . ■■�11�■■■■■III ■■�11�■■■■■III 9 Water �Initial Water ,;_ - = �■■� ■■I ■■�11�■■■■■III ■■�11�■■■■■III 1■�11�■■■■■III �■■� �■■� '' .' �■■■■■iiia■■■■■iiia■■■■■iii :. �■■■■■�II�■■■■■�II�■■■■■III �■■■■■�11�■■■■■�11�■■■■■SII ", :: �■■■■■�11�■■■■■�11�■■■■■SII ' �■■■■■iiia■■■■■iiia■■■■■iii , : �■■■■■�II�■■■■■�11�■■■■■III ' �■■■■■�11�■■■■■�11�■■■■■III �■■■■■�II�■■■■■�II�■■■■■III , :. �■■■■■�II�■■■■■�II�■■■■■III �■■■■■�11�■■■■■�11�■■■■■III , : �■■■■■�11�■■■■■�11�■■■■■III �■■■■■�11�■■■■■�11�■■■■■III .: �■■■■■�11�■■■■■�II�■■■■■III �■■■■■�II�■■■■■�11�■■■■■III Geo -Logic CONSOLIDATION TEST - ASTM D2435 PSI # 553779 Job No. 2008-026 Boring Sample No. B-2 Date 08-15-12 ' " MEN Natural MEN ���iii ����iiii■■i • Submerged iii MEN F. Sandy SlIt in Dry Density: 61.3 pcf in Initial Water Content: 54.4 % in Final Water Content: 34.8 % in H20 @ 100 PSF in ���i�■iii�����■iiii���iiiiii _ sells Geo, Logic CONSOLIDATION TEST - ASTM D2435 PSI # 559-779 Job No. 2008-026 C• • • - No. • 1 1 Date 08-15-12 �� .. ������ �!-�:i'.�G .ice■■■■■-���■■■■■ m N Vk'F2Z'lCvsi~I ?I■70ftia-MIi■. "M70■ON■■■■■ MEN ����■■■■■����■■■■■ ■■■ MEN Natural 001 MEN 001 MEN . ��MM■■■■■��= I■■■ F.M. Silty Sand in Dry Density: 108.5 pcf in Initial water content: 20.2 % in Final Water Content: 20.0 % in H20 @ 100 PSF in �. 1 .; sells Geo, Logic PSI # 559-771 SOIL TEST RESULTS Job No. 2008-026 SAMPLE NO.: B-4 @ 0 -3 - DESCRIPTION F.M. Sand DIRECT SHEAR TEST (type) Initial Moisture Content % Dry Density cf Normal Stress sf Peak Shear Stress (psf) Ultimate Shear Stress sf Cohesion sf Internal Friction Angle (degrees) EXPANSION TEST UBC STD 18-2 Initial Dry Density cf Initial Moisture Content % Final Moisture Content % Pressure sf Expansion Index Swell % CORROSIVITY TEST Resistivity CTM643) (ohm -cm 11150 pH (CTM643) 7.8 CHEMICAL TESTS Soluble Sulfate CTM 417 m 156 Chloride Content (CTM 422) (ppm) 99 Wash #200 Sieve ASTM -1140 % Sand Equivalent (ASTM D2419) Geo, Logic EXPANSION INDEX - UBC 18-2 & ASTM D 4829-88 PROJECT PSI # 559-771 JOB NO. 2008-026 Sample B-4 @ 0-3.0' By LD Sta. No. Soil Type Brown, F.M. Sand Sample By Sta. No. Soil Type Date Time Dial Reading Wet+Tare 595.4 Date Dial Reading Wet+Tare 8/20/2012 15:00 0.1253 Tare 219.6 Tare H2O Net Weight 375.8 Net Weight 8/21/2012 10:30 0.1259 % Water 12.5 % Water Dry Dens. 101.2 Dry Dens. % Max % Max Wet+Tare 619.5 Wet+Tare Tare 219.6 Tare Net Weight 399.9 Net Weight INDEX -1 -0.1% % Water 19.7 INDEX % Water Sample By Sta. No. Soil Type Sample By Sta. No. Soil Type Date Dial Reading Wet+Tare Date Dial Reading Wet+Tare Tare Tare Net Weight Net Weight % Water % Water Dry Dens. Dry Dens. % Max % Max Wet+Tare Wet+Tare Tare Tare Net Weight Net Weight INDEX % Water INDEX % Water Geologic Associates GRAVEL i SAND SILT AND CLAY COARSE FINE I COARSE MEDIUM FINE J. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES HYDROMETER 40 1 100 90 80 70 F x LO 60 LLI CIO 50 i N to a 40 0- h z Lu 30 K w a 20 10 0 100 50 20 10 5 2 1 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.005 0.002 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS Exploration No. Sample No. Depth (ft) SYMBOL Win (0/a) LL PI % Clay Description and Classification D 60 U 30 D 10 C„ C, B1 15.0 • Silty Sand with trace organics 0.14 0.09 0.08 1.8 0.7 ■ O PROJECT NAME: Newport Beach, CA Townhomes/Condos PARTICLE -SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVES PROJECT NUMBER: 0559771 (SNA) sieve only (01/2000) SIEVEBI@15.xlsx PSI L 2 QU E FACT2 ON ANA LYS 2 5 S U MMARY Co pWwr i g.h t by c i v i l Te c h S o Ftwa r e w _ ci vi -1 techs o-Ftw ara _ com ^ Font'cCOuri er New Re9u7 ar, S -Sze $ i s re.commarid ed -Far thi s report _ LlCerlS ed 'CO $/Z3/ZUtz 4:16:-1U PM TownFromeS\l i queFy _ -1 i q Tl'C7 a NeWPOrt Bea C1"l - TOwflflome5/COr1d05 S u bt i t 7 e o O S S 97 7 1 S u rPa C e E 7 a v_ — oeptlh oP Ho1 a= SO _ 00 �t wane r Ta b l a d u r illi g Ea rt h q u a K a= 5_ 0 0 Pt wa t e r Tab ? e d u r i n g S n- S i to Te s t i. n g= O. 00 -Ft Max _ Acca'1 a ra-ti on= O _ S g E a r t F'lq u a Ke M ag n i t u d e= 7_ B0 i n p u t o ata _ H O 1 e N O_- oaptFr o -F Ho7 e=50 _ 00 'Ft ware r Ta b l e d u r i n g Ea r t F.q u a K e= S_ O O Ft water Tabl a du ri ng zn-Situ Testi rzg= O _ 00 -F-t Max _ Accel a rata on=0 _ S g EartFlquaKe Magrri rude=7 _ 30 NO- Li gUaf'i abs 0 SOti -1 S ] CL , OL ar'e NOn--LI q _ Sai -1 1_ S PT o r B PT Ca -1 C u l at i o n_ 2 _ Sett -1 am Arlt Alla? yS.l S Me tt - iI Flares / 3_ Fi nes s Correct-� o n Fo i clq e'F r L u a ct a n o S d:r i 4 _ Fi ria Carre cti on For Sat t-1 emer-lt = �u ri rig 5' _ Se'C'C7 ement Calcul a -Ci ol-n in o Al 7 zones 6 _--larnme r Erle rg y Ratio , 7 _ BOre1'rOl a of amater', S _ Samp7 i xlg MatF'rod , 9 _ U50r req ur=5t �actOr o -F sa�2Ly �app7 y to P -IOL OTa CSR ClJ rve �-Fs 1: Uses rJ 10 _ U s e C u ry e S mo of h i rtg o N o -= Recommended opt -ions 2 n -Sit u Ta s t O ata _'. O e;pth SPT gamma Fi nes -Ft PCF % O_ O O 2 0_ 0 0 1 16 _ 0 0 5_ 0 0 19 _ 00 3-.-245 O O 5_ (DC) 7 .5 O S 00 110 _ 0 0 S_$ O 1 0_ 00 1 9_ 0 0 1Z 6. 0 0 10 _ 10 1 5_ 00 1 7_ 0C> 3-:a 6_ 0 0 6_ 00 2 0_ 0 0 2 7_ 0 0 1= 6_ 00 6_ 00 Z S CDC) 1$_ 0 0 1:2 6_ 00 S_ 10 3 0_ 0 0 -.4.5 - 00 1 2 6. 00 5_ 10 3 5_ 0 0 4a_ - 00 1 2 6_ 00 5_ 10 Page 1 YO s �l l m l fl a. s sjSeed Li que-Facti ocl� CSR , lJsar= 1 _ 25 1 aLT �, a'tmos pr -r er e> i t5'r LLOrI/'1-L Z� GRRm Cycl i c rasi stance raLi o 'Fr orrm soi l 5 CSRs-F Gycl i c stress rati o i r'rduced by a gi veri eartbquaFca �wtitl-� usar 'request factor a -F sa-FeLy� F _ S _ FaCtOr O"F Sa-Eery agai rnSL 7 i queFacti on , F _ S _ =G.R Rm./CSRS� S_sat Set t7 emerrt From s.a tura-ted sands S_d ry Settl emerit -From ur.satu rated Sar�ds S_a.l 1 Tota -1 SatLl emery -C -From Saturated acrd uric aLu rated Sar -ids I i qua-Ffy _ sum- txt O_ 57 3_ 7 3 O_ OO O_ OO O_ O O O 2_ 14 O_ S 7 3_ 7-7 O_ 00 O_ O O O_ O O " F _ S _ s1 r_i qu a'Facti on Poter'rti al Z:o r.e L`F _ 5 _ l S 1 l Ml "C ed LO S , CRR l S 7 7 m.l 'iEd LO Z , CSR l S 7'1 Ti ied L:O Z� tJ fli LS Uft l'C- qC, 'FS, Stre SS O[' Pr05SUre = atM <1_OS$1t s-F� q Ufli L. Wel gF'2L = P G'F � pe pth = i=t � Sett7 emerit = i n _ 1 aLT �, a'tmos pr -r er e> i t5'r LLOrI/'1-L Z� GRRm Cycl i c rasi stance raLi o 'Fr orrm soi l 5 CSRs-F Gycl i c stress rati o i r'rduced by a gi veri eartbquaFca �wtitl-� usar 'request factor a -F sa-FeLy� F _ S _ FaCtOr O"F Sa-Eery agai rnSL 7 i queFacti on , F _ S _ =G.R Rm./CSRS� S_sat Set t7 emerrt From s.a tura-ted sands S_d ry Settl emerit -From ur.satu rated Sar�ds S_a.l 1 Tota -1 SatLl emery -C -From Saturated acrd uric aLu rated Sar -ids .� h f +nrultittri To Nild 0ii Erorn"" • Ca su" • ftstkv Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Commercial Building and Church 3303 and 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, Orange County, CA Prepared for Wieland-Davco Corporation 4162 English Oak Drive Lansing, Michigan 48911 Prepared by Professional Service Industries, Inc. 6330 Gateway Drive, Suite B Cypress, California 90630 August 29, 2012 PSI Project 0559-771 Report of Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment 911012012 PSI Project 055 9- 771 Commercial Building & Church -Newport Beach, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS............................................................................ 1 1.1 PHASE I ESA............................................................................................... 1 1.2 RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................3 2 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 4 2.1 CONTRACT.................................................................................................4 2.2 PURPOSE OF SERVICES.......................................................................... 4 2.3 STANDARD OF CARE AND WARRANTIES...............................................4 2.4 USE BY OTHER PARTIES.......................................................................... 5 3 SCOPE AND RESOURCES..................................................................................... 7 3.1 PHASE I ESA............................................................................................... 7 3.2 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES.......................................................... 9 3.3 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS...................................................................9 3.4 LIMITATIONS, EXCEPTIONS, DEVIATIONS AND DATA GAP.. ..... ..... _ 10 4 USER -PROVIDED INFORMATION........................................................................ 11 4.1 USER'S RESPONSIBILITIES.................................................................... 11 4.2 HELPFUL DOCUMENTS........................................................................... 11 4.3 PROCEEDINGS........................................................................................ 11 4.4 SUGGESTED INFORMATION.................................................................. 11 4.5 FINDINGS..................................................................................................11 5 SUBJECT PROPERTY USAGE............................................................................. 12 5.1 LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION .................................................. 12 5.2 PHYSICAL SETTING................................................................................. 12 5.3 CURRENT USES....................................................................................... 12 5.4 PAST USES............................................................................................... 14 6 ADJOINING AND SURROUNDING PROPERTY USAGE ..................................... 15 7 ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW ..................................... 17 7.1 DATABASE FINDINGS.............................................................................. 17 7.2 OTHER REGULATORY INFORMATION................................................... 17 8 INTERVIEWS......................................................................................................... 19 8.1 INTERVIEW PARTIES............................................................................... 19 8.2 INTERVIEW FINDINGS............................................................................. 19 APPENDICES FIGURES PHOTOGRAPHS ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE REPORT HISTORICAL RESEARCH INFORMATION REGULATORY RECORDS DOCUMENTATION INTERVIEW DOCUMENTATION DATA GAP WORKSHEET PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 911012012 PSI Project 0559-771 Commercial Building & Church -Newport Beach, CA 1 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) of the property at 3303 and 3355 Via Lido in Newport Beach, California. The assessment included a Phase I ESA only. PSI performed the assessment to comply with the contract between PSI and Weiland-Davco Corporation. The subject property is located on the northwestern corner of Via Lido and Via Malaga. Currently, the subject property is developed with an approximately 9,100 square foot single -story church and an approximately 1,500 square foot single -story building known as the `Reading Room". The two buildings are separated by a concrete breezeway. An approximately 10,260 square foot three-story commercial building is also developed north -adjacent to the "Reading Room." The commercial building contains offices and a restaurant on the ground floor with an elevator providing access to the various floors. The buildings are developed on the east side of the lot while asphalt parking is present on the west side of the lot. The subject property was undeveloped as late as 1951. By 1951, the subject property was first developed with the church. In 1959, the commercial building was constructed. The subject property is located within an area developed for commercial, retail, and residential use. Usage of the adjoining properties include: a multi commercial building to the north, Via Lido followed by single-family residences to the east, Via Malaga followed by multiple commercial buildings and a church to the south, and Via Oporto followed by a parking lot and a retail plaza to the west. The northwest adjoining property is developed with a dry cleaner; and according to personnel, dry cleaning is performed on-site. Based on the inherent environmental risk associated with this type of business, the adjacent dry cleaner is considered to represent a recognized environmental condition (REC) in connection with the subject property. 1.1 PHASE I ESA PSI performed the Phase I ESA in general conformance with ASTM E 1527-05. Limitations, exceptions and deviations from this protocol are discussed in Section 3. 1.1.1 OPINIONS Significant Data Gaps Based on our experience, the information that we gathered and evaluated did not present significant data gaps that affected our ability to identify recognized environmental conditions (RECs) in connection with the subject property. I Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment PSI Project 0559-771 Commercial Building & Church -Newport Beach, CA Recognized Environmental Conditions 911012012 This assessment revealed the following evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property: • The northwest adjoining property is developed with a dry cleaner; and according to personnel, dry cleaning is performed on-site. Based on the inherent environmental risk associated with this type of business, the adjacent dry cleaner is considered to represent a recognized environmental condition (REC) in connection with the subject property. 1.1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL DECLARATIONS Mr. Paul Kim gathered and compiled information contained in this report and performed the site and area reconnaissance. for Mr. Paul Kim Environmental Professional Assessor Reviewed By: Mr. Lloyd Guss Environmental Professional Principal Consultant I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312. I have the specific qualifications based on education, training and experience to assess a property of the nature, history and setting of the subject property. I have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR 312. 2 Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment PSI Project 0559-771 Commercial Building & Church -Newport Beach, CA 1.2 RECOMMENDATIONS 911012011 Based on the findings and conclusions of this report, PSI recommends the following: • A phase II environmental site assessment should be performed at the subject property line adjacent to the dry cleaner to assess if the dry cleaner has negatively impacted the subject property. This summary does not contain all the information presented in the full report. The report should be read in its entirety to obtain a more complete understanding of the information provided and to aid in any decisions made or actions taken based on this information. 3 Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment PSI Project 0559-771 Commercial Building & Church -Newport Beach, CA irkIZIll 9:Z*]X101"9M01 2.1 CONTRACT The contract between PSI and our Client is summarized below: 911012012 Summary Client Weiland-Davco Corporation Authorizing Party Mr. Justin Park Title Project Manager Engagement ID, Date PSI PO -0559-71885 June 14, 2012 PSI considers the client to be the `User' of our assessment, defined in the Practice as: "The party seeking to use Practice E 1527 to complete an environmental site assessment of the property. A user may include, without limitation, a potential purchaser of a property, a potential tenant of property, an owner of property, a lender or a property manager. The user has specific obligations for completing a successful application of this practice...." 2.2 PURPOSE OF SERVICES Based on the information provided, PSI understands that your purpose for having the Phase I ESA performed is to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on CERCLA liability (hereinafter landowner liability protections or LLPs). The scope of services presented below is intended to satisfy this purpose. PSI performed the Phase I ESA in general conformance with ASTM E 1527-05, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process (the Practice). The purpose of the Practice was to define good commercial practice for conducting an environmental site assessment and as such, the Practice is intended to permit the user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the LLPs. The goal of the processes established by the Practice is to identify recognized environmental conditions (RECs) in connection with the property. 2.3 STANDARD OF CARE AND WARRANTIES Our services were not intended to be technically exhaustive. There is a possibility that with the proper application of methodologies, conditions may exist on the property that could not be identified within the scope of the assessment(s) or that were not reasonably identifiable from the available information. S Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 911012012 PSI Project 0559-771 Commercial Building & Church -Newport Beach, CA No ESA can fully eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs in connection with the property. The ESA was intended to reduce, but not eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs in connection with a property. In conformance with ASTM E 1527-05, our report is based on commonly known and reasonably ascertainable information, including limited ground -level visual inspection of the property, except where otherwise explicitly indicated. Findings and conclusions derived from the methodologies described in the Practice contain all of the inherent limitations in the methodologies that are referred to in the Practice. PSI did not perform any exploratory probing or discovery, perform tests, operate any specific equipment, or take measurements or samples to perform the ESA scope. The ESA was not a building code, safety, regulatory or environmental compliance inspection. The ESA is not intended to reduce the risk of the presence of mold and physical deficiencies conducive to mold nor the risk that mold or physical deficiencies conducive to mold may pose to the buildings and building occupants. The methodologies include reviewing information provided by other sources. PSI treats information obtained from the record reviews and interviews concerning the property as reliable and the ASTM protocol does not require PSI to independently verify the information. Therefore, PSI cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that the information provided by these other sources is accurate or complete. No other warranties are implied or expressed. PSI warrants that the findings contained in this report have been prepared in general conformance with accepted professional practices at the time of report preparation as applied by similar professionals. Future changes in standards, practices, or regulations cannot be anticipated and have not been addressed. The observations and recommendations presented in this report are time dependent, and conditions will change. This report speaks only as of its date. 2.4 USE BY OTHER PARTIES This report was prepared pursuant to a contract between PSI and its client. That contractual relationship included an exchange of information about the property that was unique and serves as the basis upon which this report was prepared. Because of the importance of these understandings, our assessment may not be sufficient for the intended purposes of another party. Reliance or any use of this report by anyone other than those parties identified above, for which it was prepared, is prohibited and therefore not foreseeable to PSI. Any unauthorized reliance on or use of this report, including any of the information or conclusions contained herein, will be at the third party's risk. No warranties or representations expressed or implied in this report are made to any such third party. y Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment PSI Project 0559-771 Commercial Building & Church -Newport Beach, CA 911012011 Third party reliance letters may be issued upon timely request and payment of the then - current fee for such letters. All third parties relying on our report, by such reliance, agree that such reliance is limited by our proposal and General Conditions. Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment PSI Project 0559-771 Commercial Building & Church -Newport Beach, CA 3 SCOPE AND RESOURCES 3.1 PHASE I ESA 911012012 PSI performed a Phase I ESA of the subject property that generally conforms to the scope and limitations of the Practice. The assessment included four components: • Records review; • Reconnaissance; • Interviews; and • Preparation of this report, including our evaluation. The scope of our services and the information resources accessed are detailed below. 3.1.1 STAFF Mr. Paul Kim, Assessor, performed the site and area reconnaissance on August 16, 2012. Mr. Eric Fraske, the supervising project Environmental Professional, supervised planning the site reconnaissance and interviews, gathered and compiled information for this assessment, and reviewed and interpreted the information. Credentials and qualifications of persons responsible for preparation of this report are appended. 3.1.2 RECORDS REVIEW Physical Setting Sources PSI reviewed United States Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic (Topo) Maps and other information regarding the physical setting of the site to assist with the interpretation of subsurface water movement near the property. Summary Source Name Year Published/Issued USGS 60 Minute Topo Map Southern CA Sheet 1: 1901 USGS 30 Minute Topo Map Corona: 1902 USGS 15 Minute Topo Map Santa Ana: 1901, 1942 USGS 7.5 Minute Topo Map Newport Beach: 1935, 1951, 1965, 1972, 1981 Soil Survey EDR: 2012 Environmental Regulatory Database Information PSI retained Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) to provide environmental database information attributed to the site and its surroundings. EDR obtains environmental databases published by local, state, tribal, and federal agencies and 7 Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment PSI Project 0559-771 Commercial Building & Church -Newport Beach, CA 911012012 geocodes the information for electronic searches. EDR's service includes reporting Standard Environmental Records Sources and, in most cases, some Additional Environmental Records Sources. The search was performed to Approximate Minimum Search Distances (AMSD) listed in ASTM E 1527-05. Unmappable (orphan) sites listed with insufficient address or geocoding information for EDR to map were evaluated for potential location within the AMSD. PSI used information provided about the city, county and Zip Code attributed to these sites to determine if they are located in the vicinity of the subject property. Historical Use Information PSI used USGS Topo maps and retained EDR to provide information about the history of the site and its surroundings. PSI also referenced other historical sources. Summary Source Type Years Reviewed Source Note USGS Topo Maps See Above USGS Aerial Photograph(s) 1938, 1947, 1953, 1968, 1977, 1990, 1994/1995, and 2005 EDR Fire Insurance Maps 1959 and 1961 EDR Street Directories 1920-2002 EDR NA = None Available (Not Readily Ascertainable). NR = Not Reviewed. NPR = Not Practically Reviewable. Topographic Mas reviewed are previously listed. Recorded Land Title Records PSI did not review land title records to obtain information about the current and past owners of the site and prior uses and tenancies User -Provided Information The Practice describes information to be provided by the user, owner and key site manager. This information is detailed on appended questionnaire that PSI sent to the user. 3.1.3 RECONNAISSANCE Mr. Justin Park, the project manager for the proposed construction, granted PSI access to the commercial building located at 3355 Via Lido, while Lestie Martindale, the site manager, provided access to the church at 3303 Via Lido. PSI's assessor was unescorted during the site reconnaissance. 8 Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 911012012 PSI Project 0559-771 Commercial Building & Church -Newport Beach, CA The ground reconnaissance consisted of observing the periphery of the property and viewing the site from accessible adjacent public access areas. Visual reconnaissance of adjoining properties was limited to areas and facilities that were readily observable from the subject property or from public access areas. PSI systematically toured interior portions of the property to provide an overlapping field of view. The periphery of structures, where present on the property, was observed along with accessible interior common areas, maintenance/repair areas and a representative number of occupant spaces. PSI took photographs to document selected features. 3.1.4 INTERVIEWS PSI made reasonable attempts to interview selected persons having knowledge of the uses and conditions of the site, past and present. A list of the persons that PSI interviewed and attempted to interview, along with our interpretations is presented in Section 8. 3.1.5 REFERENCES The information sources that PSI used, including published material, material obtained from commercial sources, from other sources, or provided to us through questionnaires is cited as that information is presented in the report. Some of this information, or excerpts thereof, are also appended. 3.2 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Our services did not include effort outside the scope of the Practice to evaluate issues related to business environmental risk associated with the property. 3.3 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS PSI made the following assumptions in developing our Phase I ESA findings and conclusions: • Groundwater Flow Direction - PSI interpreted and inferred the direction of the shallow groundwater movement based on the information we obtained and our experience. Actual groundwater flow may be locally influenced by many factors beyond the scope of this study. Subsurface investigation would be necessary to determine site-specific groundwater flow direction. • Regulatory Agency Information - PSI considers all information provided by EDR regarding regulatory status of facilities to be complete, accurate, and current. N Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment PSI Project 0559-771 Commercial Building & Church -Newport Beach, CA 911012011 • Other Regulatory Information - PSI considers all other information obtained from regulatory or enforcement agencies to be complete, accurate, and current. • Title, Lien and Activity and Use Limitation (AUL) Information - PSI considers all information provided by EDR, its subcontractors, or other real estate title records review firms regarding property ownership or encumbrances to be complete, accurate and current. • Interviews - PSI considers all information provided through interviews to be complete, unbiased and provided in good faith. 3.4 LIMITATIONS, EXCEPTIONS, DEVIATIONS AND DATA GAP PSI considers that limitations, exceptions and deviations from the Practice manifest as a lack of or inability to obtain information required by the Practice. This represents the definition of the `data gap' contained in the Practice. PSI tracked the components for this assessment on the Data Gap Worksheet, which is appended. Therefore the limitations, exceptions and deviations are identified in the Worksheet. In general, when required information was incomplete, not provided, otherwise not obtained or indicated a need for additional information, PSI attempted to use information from other sources to meet the Practices' performance objectives. When the data gaps affected the Environmental Professional's ability to identify RECs, PSI considered the data gap(s) to be significant. Any significant data gaps identified by PSI are recorded in the Data Gap Worksheet and reported in Section 1.1. 10 Report of'Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment 911012012 PSI Project 055 9- 771 Commercial Building & Church -Newport Beach, CA 4 USER -PROVIDED INFORMATION PSI provided the client with a standard questionnaire. The response statuses are tabulated below. The questionnaires are appended and selected portions are discussed in the following sections. 4.1 USER'S RESPONSIBILITIES The client provided PSI with documentation about liens recorded against the subject property. The information indicated that an environmental lien is not recorded against the subject property. 4.1.2 ACTIVITY AND LAND USE LIMITATIONS (AULS) The client provided PSI with documentation about AULs recorded against the subject property. The information indicated that an AUL is not recorded against the subject property. 4.2 HELPFUL DOCUMENTS The client did not provide PSI with prior reports of prior assessments of the site. 4.3 PROCEEDINGS The client did not provide PSI with documentation about legal proceedings or litigation involving the subject property. 4.4 SUGGESTED INFORMATION PSI requested certain information about the property to assist with our assessment. Most of this information, such as the nature of the property and its legal description, are presented in the corresponding section of this report. 4.5 FINDINGS PSI identified no evidence of RECs in the user -provided information. // Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment PSI Project 0559-771 Commercial Building & Church -Newport Beach, CA 6�M]411J:111111r:1301:2=1A AIRY -1<<']0 5.1 LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION 911012012 Summary Project Name Church and Commercial Building Property Address 3303 and 3355 Via Lido City, County, State, ZIP Code Newport Beach, Orange County, California 92663 No. Buildings/Units/Stories Two single -story building and one three-story building Area (sf) Approximately total of 20,860 square feet Occupied Subgrade Spaces? No Year(s), First Developed for Current Use 1951 Church & 1959 Commercial Building The subject property is located on the northwestern corner of Via Lido and Via Malaga. 5.2 PHYSICAL SETTING Summary Nominal Elevations, (ft, MSL) 7 feet Surface Topo Characteristics General topographic gradient towards the south. General Soil Type, Slopes Beach Sand Does EDR Map a Floodplain On -Site? Yes -500 Year On -Site Water Bodies None Off -Site Water Bodies Newport Bay is to the west. Note: MSL means Mean Sea Level According to a recent geotechnical study performed by PSI on August 24, 2012, groundwater was observed at the site: • Approximately 5 feet below the ground surface, and • Flow direction is subject to tidal influence. 5.3 CURRENT USES Currently, the subject property is developed with an approximately 9,100 square foot single -story church and an approximately 1,500 square foot single -story building known as the 'Reading Room". The two buildings are separated by a concrete breezeway. An approximately 10,260 square foot three-story commercial building is also developed 12 Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment PSI Project 0559-771 Commercial Building & Church -Newport Beach, CA 911012011 north -adjacent to the "Reading Room." The commercial building contains offices and a restaurant on the ground floor with an elevator providing access to the various floors. The buildings are developed on the east side of the lot while asphalt parking is present on the west side of the lot. 5.3.1 INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR OBSERVATIONS A summary of uses and conditions is tabulated below. Detailed information is discussed following the summary along with an opinion about the significance of the listing. 13 Summary Yes Identified? No ❑ ® Hazardous Substances ❑ ® Petroleum Products ❑ ® Aboveground or Underground Storage Tanks (ASTs/USTs) ❑ ® Drums ❑ ® Suspect Containers ❑ ® Electrical or Mechanical Equip. Suspected to Contain PCBs ❑ ® Interior Stains or Corrosion ❑ ® Drains or Sumps ❑ ® Wastewater Discharges ❑ ® Septic or Sewage Tanks ❑ ® Pits, Ponds or Lagoons ❑ ® Pools of Liquid or Standing Water ❑ ® Solid Waste Dumping/Landfills/Suspect Fill Material ❑ ® Stained Soil or Pavement ❑ ® Stressed Vegetation ❑ ® Drinking Water Wells ❑ ® Irrigation Wells ❑ ® Monitoring Wells ❑ ® Odors ❑ ® Other Uses or Conditions of Concern 13 Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment PSI Project 0559-771 Commercial Building & Church -Newport Beach, CA 5.3.2 UTILITIES Utility systems identified at the property are summarized below: 911012012 • The facility heating ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) system is located on the roof. The system is powered by electricity. • Sewage disposal at the property is provided through municipal sources. • Potable water at the property is obtained through municipal sources. PSI identified no evidence of RECs in the current uses of the property. 5.4 PAST USES Our interpretation of the past uses of the property is tabulated below. Summary Year(s) Interpreted Property Use 1938-1951 Historical aerial photographs depict the property to be undeveloped vacant land. 1951-1959 Historical aerial photographs and USGS Topographic maps depict the property to be developed with the church. 1959-2012 Historical aerial photographs, USGS Topographic maps, and the site reconnaissance, depict the property developed with the church, reading room and multi -story commercial building. The subject property was undeveloped as late as 1951. By 1951, the subject property was developed with the church. In 1959, records show the reading room and multi- story commercial building with a restaurant. 14 Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 911012012 PSI Project 0559-771 Commercial Building & Church -Newport Beach, CA 6 ADJOINING AND SURROUNDING PROPERTY USAGE A summary of our interpretation of the current and past uses and conditions of adjoining and surrounding property based on historical records and observations is provided below. Adjoining North Year(s) Interpreted Property Use 1938-1953 Aerial photographs depict the property to be developed with 1953-2005 possibly a building. 1953-2005 Aerial photographs and Sandborn maps depict the property to be developed with a structure. Uses of the structure were not 1953 available through our records search. 2012 As of site reconnaissance, the property was developed with a multi -tenant retail building. The closest tenant to the subject 1959-2005 property is a spa and boutique called "A Little Touch of Heaven' located at 3363 Via Lido. Adjoining East Year(s) Interpreted Property Use 1938-1953 Aerial photographs depict the area to be undeveloped land with the exception of Via Lido. 1953-2005 Aerial photographs and Sandborn maps depict the area to be developed with Via Lido and multiple residences. 2012 As of site reconnaissance, the area is developed with Via Lido and multiple two-story single-family residences. Adjoining South Year(s) Interpreted Property Use 1938 Aerial photographs depict the area to be undeveloped land with the exception of Via Malaga. 1947 Aerial photographs depict the area developed with one building to the east with a portion of Via Malaga undeveloped. 1953 Aerial photographs depict the area to be developed with Via Malaga followed by buildings developed on all parcels except for the west most parcel. 1959-2005 Aerial photographs and Sandborn maps depict the area developed with Via Malaga followed by multiple buildings and a church. 2012 As of site reconnaissance, the property was developed with Via Malaga followed by a couple of two-story commercial buildings and a church. 15 Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment PSI Project 0559-771 Commercial Building & Church -Newport Beach, CA 911012012 Adjoining West Year(s) Interpreted Property Use 1938-1947 Aerial photographs depict the property to be developed with Via Oporto followed by undeveloped land. 1953 Aerial photographs depict the property to be developed with Via Oporto followed by a multi -tenant retail building with a parking lot along the north portion of the property. 1953-2005 Aerial photographs and Sandborn maps depict the property to be developed with Via Oporto followed by a multi -tenant retail building with a parking lot. 2011 As of site reconnaissance, the property was developed with Via Oporto followed by a multi -tenant retail building with a parking lot. The subject property is located within an area developed for commercial, retail and residential use. Usage of the adjoining properties include: a multi commercial buildings to the north, Via Lido followed by single-family residences to the east, Via Malaga followed by multiple commercial buildings and a church to the south, and Via Oporto followed by a parking lot and a retail plaza to the west. The northwest adjoining property is developed with a dry cleaner; and according to personnel, dry cleaning is performed on-site. Based on the inherent environmental risk associated with this type of business, the adjacent dry cleaner is considered to represent a REC in connection with the subject property. 16 Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 911012012 PSI Project 0559-771 Commercial Building & Church -Newport Beach, CA 7 ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW 7.1 DATABASE FINDINGS The distribution of listed sites with respect to the property is tabulated and mapped in EDR's report, which is appended. PSI did not image EDR's results table into the body of this report to reduce the chance for transcription errors. The reader is referred to this table, which can be found near the front of EDR's report. EDR reported unmappable (orphan) listed sites. PSI reviewed the information EDR provided about these sites and those that could be field -verified within the AMSD are discussed in the appropriate section below. VA K x0 d :J :Zd» :i V7 The subject property was not identified in EDR's report. VAF�_1lKel1.11.[H_1i 1DI&IIl:7:Zo117�IC1.";a:Z6]»AVA Adjoining property addresses were not identified in the EDR report. EDR reported properties surrounding the subject site. However, PSI considered all of the listed sites unlikely to impact the subject site, based upon factors including (but not limited to): • The nature of the listing, • The use of the site, • When the site was listed and its current listed status, • The developmental density of the setting, • The distance between the listed and subject sites as related to the distance that releases are likely to migrate based on local surface and subsurface drainage conditions, • The presence of intervening drainage divides, and • The inferred groundwater movement. 7.2 OTHER REGULATORY INFORMATION 7.2.1 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUESTS PSI submitted Freedom of Information requests to the agencies tabulated below. Response status is also tabulated. Summary Response? Yes No ❑ ® Orange County Health Care Agency 17 Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment PSI Project 0559-771 Commercial Building & Church -Newport Beach, CA 911012011 Summary Response? Yes No ® ❑ City of Newport Beach Fire Department -Fire Prevention Note: Response status based on date of report. At the time of this report, no correspondence from the Orange County Health Care Agency has been received. If further pertinent correspondence from this agency is received that changes the findings or conclusions of this report, an addendum will be prepared and forwarded on for inclusion in this report. According to an interview with a representative of the City of Newport Beach Fire Department, no files for the subject property address were identified during a search of their files. 18 Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment PSI Project 0559-771 Commercial Building & Church -Newport Beach, CA I:MIZ1119=1UVAIATIT&I 8.1 INTERVIEW PARTIES 911012011 Summary Name Affiliation Role Mr. Justin Park Weiland-Davco Corporation Client Contact Ms. Lestie Martindale First Church of Christ, Scientist Site Contact Ms. Nadine City of Newport Beach Fire Department- Fire Prevention Local Government Official Ms. KathrynO range County Health Care Agency- Records Local Governmental Official 8.2 INTERVIEW FINDINGS Pertinent information collected during the abovementioned interviews has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of the report. PSI identified no evidence of RECs in the information obtained from the interviews. 19 Appendix A: Figures Image Provided by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. SITE LOCATION MAP Proposed Townhomes Inf,�}C��y tkni 3303 Via Lido To Hu[Id 0n Newport Beach, CA PREPARED FOR: Weiland-Davco PROJ. MGR: Paul Kim DATE: 08/29/2012 DRAWN BY: Eric Fraske PROJ. #: 0559771 COMMERCIAL BUILDING FIRE STATION �v= Information COMMERCIAL BUILDING/CHURCH /�� UH Build On 3303/3355 VIA LIDO LEGEND. Eny/ ENYIRarkw • ENTAL SE • WES NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92663 ENVlRONNENT.IL SERVICES SFR -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE cypro,r�Ca&,omie 90530 .1.PHASE 2 (714) �4-HW ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENI L FA ROAD T�2 ROAD APPROXIWA SCALE. 1' 90' ae rue r%: rwurec — EFD I 81JI112 I 771-02 E F. 0559771 2 Appendix B: Photographs Photo 1: View of 3355 Via Lido facing West Photo 2: View of 3355 Via Lido facing East PSI Project No. 0559771 Photo 3: View of Restaurant on first floor of 3355 Via Lido Photo 4: View inside one of office suites of 3355 Via Lido PSI Project No. 0559771 Photo 5: View of 3303 Via Lido facing West Photo 6: View of 3303 Via Lido facing East =�/ PSI Project No. 0559771 Photo 7: View inside Church Photo 8: View inside Reading Room =�/ PSI Project No. 0559771 Photo 9: View of Via Lido facing North Photo 10: View of East adjacent properties across Via Lido =P/ PSI Project No. 0559771 Photo 11: View of Via Malaga facing East Photo 12: View of South adjacent property across Via Malaga rvJIM PSI Project No. 0559771 Photo 13: View of Via Oporto facing south Photo 14: View of West adjacent property across Via Oporto PSI Project No. 0559771 Photo 15: View of North adjacent properties r l PSI Project No. 0559771 Appendix C: Environmental Database Report Proposed Townhomes 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA 92663 Inquiry Number: 3396733.2s August 23, 2012 440 Wheelers Farms Road ® Milford, CT 06461 EDR Environmental Data Resources Inc Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edmet.com r:na�ce�yimnu�c� TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 DetailMap------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings ------------------------------------------- 8 Orphan Summary 155 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR -1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum_----------------------------- --------- -- A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary------------------------------------------- A-2 Physical Setting SSURGOSoil Map -------- --- A-6 Physical Setting Source Map A-9 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-11 Physical Setting Source Records Searched ------------------------------------ A-41 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performedby an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2012 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TC3396733.2s Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-05) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 3303 VIA LIDO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 [K.i.1:t.�rra�a=I Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator: UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Elevation: 33.6167000 - 33'37'0.12" 117.9273000 - 117' 55'38.28" Zone 11 413979.8 3719850.0 7 ft. above sea level USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY Target Property Map: Most Recent Revision: North Map: Most Recent Revision: ►_1q:i►_1111119:[gr6ZH:7a19:1a12a9:1&4 V MI181AI Portions of Photo from Source: TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS 33117-E8 NEWPORT BEACH OE S, CA 1981 33117-F8 NEWPORT BEACH (DIGITAL), CA 0 2009, 2010 USDA The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL _ _ _ _ _........ - --- - - - - ----- National Priority List TC3396733.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG------------------- RCRA- Large Quantity Generators RCRA-CESQG_ RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS --------- Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE State Response Sites State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF Solid Waste Information System State and tribal leaking storage tank lists INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists AST__________________________ Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities INDIAN UST__________________ Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites TC3396733.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites ODI Open Dump Inventory DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database SWRCY______________________ Recycler Database HAULERS-------------------- Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing INDIAN ODI__________________ Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL_ Clandestine Drug Labs HIST Cal -Sites --------------- Historical Calsites Database SCH School Property Evaluation Program Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites CDL------------------------- Clandestine Drug Labs US HIST CDL_______________ National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Land Records LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information LUCIS Land Use Control Information System LIENS Environmental Liens Listing DEED Deed Restriction Listing Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing Orange Co. Industrial Site_ ___. List of Industrial Site Cleanups Other Ascertainable Records RCRA-NonGen RCRA - Non Generators DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data DOD Department of Defense Sites CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees ROD Records Of Decision UMTRA---------------------- Uranium Mill Tailings Sites MINES_______________________ Mines Master Index File TRIS------------------------- Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TSCA ------------------------ Toxic Substances Control Act FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) HIST FTTS FIFRAITSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System PADS PCB Activity Database System MILTS Material Licensing Tracking System RADINFO-------------------- Radiation Information Database FINDS________________________ Facility Index System/Facility Registry System RAATS_ RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System TC3396733.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CA BOND EXP. PLAN________ Bond Expenditure Plan NPDES NPDES Permits Listing UIC UIC Listing WDS Waste Discharge System Notify 65 Proposition 65 Records WIP Well Investigation Program Case List ENF Enforcement Action Listing HAZNET--------------------- Facility and Manifest Data EMI__________________________ Emissions Inventory Data INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations SCRD DRYCLEANERS______. State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST PRP Potentially Responsible Parties US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List FINANCIAL ASSURANCE____ Financial Assurance Information Listing PCB TRANSFORMER-----_. PCB Transformer Registration Database PROC------------------------ Certified Processors Database MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing COAL ASH DOE -------------- Sleam-Electric Plan Operation Data COAL ASH EPA__ Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS EDR Proprietary Records Manufactured Gas Plants_____ EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR Historical Auto Stations__ EDR Proprietary Historic Gas Stations EDR Historical Cleaners______ EDR Proprietary Historic Dry Cleaners Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS: The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive TC3396733.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. A review of the CERCLIS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/27/2011 has revealed that there is 1 CERCLIS site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page CAGNEYTRUST SW CORNER OF 32ND ST & WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.199 mi.) 17 36 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERC-NFRAP: Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. A review of the CERC-NFRAP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/28/2011 has revealed that there are 2 CERC-NFRAP sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page NEWPORT PLATING CO #3 2815 VILLA WAY SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.226 mi.) H23 44 NEWPORT PLATING 2810 VILLA WAY SSW 118 - 114 (0.235 mi.) H29 66 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: CORRACTS is a list of handlers with RCRA Corrective Action Activity. This report shows which nationally -defined corrective action core events have occurred for every handler that has had corrective action activity. A review of the CORRACTS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/19/2011 has revealed that there is 1 CORRACTS site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO Federal RCRA generators list Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page 500 SUPERIOR AVE N 112. 1 (0.949 mi.) K49 113 RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/15/2012 has revealed that there are 6 TC3396733.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RCRA-SQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page IMAGE GRAPHIC 3428 VIA LIDO NW 1/8. 1/4 (0.134 mi.) C6 16 WORLD OIL CO 3401 NEWPORT B;VD WNW 1/8. 1/4 (0.182 mi.) D10 21 PENINSULA CLEANERS 3305 NEWPORT BLVD W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.185 mi.) D14 31 NEWPORT PLATING 2810 VILLA WAY SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.235 mi.) H29 66 PHILIPS ONE HR PHOTO 2825 NEWPORT BLVD SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.244 mi.) 131 68 SEA CREST CLEANERS 2825 NEWPORT BLVD UNIT SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.244 mi.) 132 69 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCL/S ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control's (DTSC's) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program's (SMBRP's) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly -contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/1312012 has revealed that there are S ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page LIDO CLEANERS 3424 VIA LIDO NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.133 mi.) C5 13 Status: Refer: 1248 Local Agency NEWPORT PLATING COMPANY #3 2815 VILLA WAY SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.226 mi.) H24 45 Status: Refer: RCRA NEWPORT PLATING CO. Status: Refer: Other Agency HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYT Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation ORANGE COUNTY REFINING CO. WEL Status: Refer: Local Agency SOUTH BASIN OIL COMPANY Status: Refer: Other Agency HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY Status: Refer: RWQCB Status: Refer: RCRA 2810 VILLA WAY ONE HOAG DRIVE 213 42ND ST. 204/206 43RD STREET 500 SUPERIOR AVE NEWPORT BEACH CORP YARD 592 SUPERIOR Status: Refer: RWQCB SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.235 mi.) H28 54 N 1/4 - 1/2 (0.458 mi.) 43 91 WNW 1/2. 1 (0.598 mi.) 46 110 WNW 1/2 - 1 (0.634 mi.) 47 111 N 1/2 - 1 (0.949 mi.) K50 133 N 1/2 - 1 (0.986 mi.) 51 148 TC3396733.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY L- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board Leaking Underground Storage Tank Information System. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/14/2012 has revealed that there are 17 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page LIDO PARK CONDOMINIUMS 601 LIDO PARK SSE 0 - 1/8 (0.097 mi.) A2 8 Status: Completed - Case Closed NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL 3300 NEWPORT W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.173 mi.) D7 17 Status: Completed - Case Closed WORLD OIL STATION #42 3401 NEWPORT BLVD W 1/8. 1/4 (0.182 mi.) D12 26 Status: Completed - Case Closed CHEVRON #7100 3531 NEWPORT WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.198 mi.) E16 33 Status: Completed - Case Closed MOBIL 3600 NEWPORT NW 1/8. 1/4 (0.212 mi.) F19 38 Status: Completed - Case Closed GERMAN AUTOS 3000 NEWPORT SW 1/8. 1/4 (0.218 mi.) G21 41 Status: Completed - Case Closed GERMAN AUTOS 3000 NEWPORT BLVD SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.218 mi.) G22 43 UNOCAL #5310 3001 NEWPORT BLVD SW 1/8. 1/4 (0.230 mi.) G26 46 Status: Completed - Case Closed Status: Open - Remediation UNDESIGNATED PARKING AREA 2809 NEWPORT SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.266 mi.) 34 71 Status: Completed - Case Closed HARBOR CLUB MARINA 3333 COAST N 1/4. 1/2 (0.290 mi.) 35 74 Status: Completed - Case Closed SHELL OIL 2801 COAST NNE 1/4-1/2(0.305 mi.) J37 77 Status: Completed - Case Closed SHELL OIL 2800 COAST NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.309 mi.) J38 79 Status: Completed - Case Closed PORT CALYPSO 2633 COAST NE 1/4. 1/2 (0.316 mi.) 39 81 Status: Completed - Case Closed NEWPORT IMPORTS 3100 W COAST HWY N 1/4. 1/2 (0.317 mi.) 40 64 Status: Completed - Case Closed Status: Completed - Case Closed SHELL OIL (FORMER) 3600 COAST NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.322 mi.) 41 87 Status: Completed - Case Closed Status: Completed - Case Closed BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA SEA BASE 1931 COAST E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.494 mi.) 45 108 Status: Completed - Case Closed Lower Elevation DELANEYS Status: Completed - Case Closed Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page 634 LIDO PARK SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.126 mi.) B4 10 TC3396733.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SLIC: SLIC Region comes from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. A review of the SLIC list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/14/2012 has revealed that there are 4 SLIC sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page NEWPORT PLATING CO. Facility Status: Open - Remediation NEWPORT PLATING ETCO HOMES Facility Status: Open - Site Assessment SUNNY FRESH CLEANERS Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed 2810 VILLA WAY SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.235 mi.) H28 54 2810 VILLA WAY SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.235 mi.) H30 68 2300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.434 mi.) 42 91 306 OLD NEWPORT BLVD N 1/4 - 1/2 (0.489 mi.) 44 106 State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board's Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. A review of the CA FID UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/31/1994 has revealed that there are A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/19/2012 has revealed that there are 8 UST Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 NEWPORT BLVD W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.173 mi.) D9 21 WORLD OIL STATION #42 3401 NEWPORT BLVD W 1/8. 1/4 (0.182 mi.) D12 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page 601 LIDO 601 LIDO PARK DR SSE 0 - 1/8 (0.097 mi.) Al 8 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 NEWPORT BLVD W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.173 mi.) D8 20 WORLD OIL STATION #42 3401 NEWPORT BLVD WNW 1/8. 1/4 (0.182 mi.) D11 25 CHEVRON STATION #97100 3531 NEWPORT WNW 1/8- 1/4 (0.198 mi.) E15 33 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3600 NEWPORT BLVD NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.212 mi.) F20 41 GERMAN AUTOS 3000 NEWPORT BLVD SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.218 mi.) G22 43 UNOCAL #5310 3001 NEWPORT BLVD # 531 SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.230 mi.) G25 46 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page LEVON GUGASIAN 634 LIDO PARK DR SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.126 mi.) B3 10 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks CA FID UST: The Facility Inventory Database contains active and inactive underground storage tank locations. The source is the State Water Resource Control Board. A review of the CA FID UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/31/1994 has revealed that there are 3 CA FID UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 NEWPORT BLVD W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.173 mi.) D9 21 WORLD OIL STATION #42 3401 NEWPORT BLVD W 1/8. 1/4 (0.182 mi.) D12 26 UNOCAL #5310 3001 NEWPORT BLVD SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.230 mi.) G26 46 TC3396733.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HIST UST: Historical UST Registered Database A review of the HIST UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/1990 has revealed that there are 4 HIST UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL 3300 NEWPORT W 1/8. 114 (0.173 mi.) D7 17 WORLD OIL CO 3401 NEWPORT B, V0 WNW 1/8. 1/4 (0.182 ml.) D10 21 97100 3531 NEWPORT BLVD WNW 1/8-1/4(0.201 mi.) E18 37 UNION OIL SERVICE STATION #531 3001 NEWPORT BLVD SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.231 mi.) G27 53 SWEEPS UST: Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990's. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. A review of the SWEEPS UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/01/1994 has revealed that there are 3 SWEEPS UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 NEWPORT BLVD W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.173 mi.) D8 20 WORLD OIL STATION #42 3401 NEWPORT BLVD WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.182 mi.) D11 25 UNOCAL #5310 3001 NEWPORT BLVD SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.230 mi.) G26 46 Other Ascertainable Records FUDS: The Listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites Properties where the US Army Corps Of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. A review of the FUDS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/31/2009 has revealed that there is 1 FUDS site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page NEWPORT BEACH FCS NE 1/2 -1 (0.776 mi.) 48 113 Cortese: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal -Sites). A review of the Cortese list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/02/2012 has revealed that there is 1 Cortese site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page NEWPORT PLATING CO. 2810 VILLA WAY SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.235 mi.) H28 54 TC3396733.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HIST CORTESE: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. A review of the HIST CORTESE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2001 has revealed that there are 14 HIST CORTESE sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL 3300 NEWPORT W 1/8. 1/4 (0.173 mi.) D7 17 WORLD OIL STATION #42 3401 NEWPORT BLVD W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.182 mi.) D12 26 CHEVRON #7100 3531 NEWPORT WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.198 mi.) E16 33 MOBIL 3600 NEWPORT NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.212 mi.) F19 38 GERMAN AUTOS 3000 NEWPORT SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.218 mi.) G21 41 UNOCAL #5310 3001 NEWPORT BLVD SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.230 mi.) G26 46 NEWPORT PLATING CO. 2810 VILLA WAY SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.235 mi.) H28 54 UNDESIGNATED PARKING AREA 2809 NEWPORT SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.266 mi.) 34 71 HARBOR CLUB MARINA 3333 COAST N 1/4. 1/2 (0.290 mi.) 35 74 CHEVRON #9-9706 2801 NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.305 mi.) J36 76 PORT CALYPSO 2633 COAST NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.316 mi.) 39 81 NEWPORT IMPORTS 3100 W COAST HWY N 1/4 - 1/2 (0.317 mi.) 40 84 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA SEA BASE 1931 COAST E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.494 mi.) 45 108 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page DELANEYS 634 LIDO PARK SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.126 mi.) B4 10 DRYCLEANERS: A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaners' agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. A review of the DRYCLEANERS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/19/2012 has revealed that there are 3 DRYCLEANERS sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page LIDO CLEANERS 3424 VIA LIDO NW 1/8. 1/4 (0.133 mi.) C5 13 KEREN FLEMING 3305 NEWPORT BEACH UNIT W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.185 mi.) D13 30 SEACREST CLEANERS 2825 NEWPORT BLVD SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.244 mi.) 133 71 HWP: Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. A review of the HWP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 05131/2012 has revealed that there is 1 HWP site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO 500 SUPERIOR AVE N 1/2. 1 (0.949 mi.) K49 113 TC3396733.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 1 records. Site Name SOUTH BASIN OIL CO WELL #1 Database(s) CERC-NFRAP TC3396733.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 OVERVIEW MAP - 3396733.2s -42 Indian Reservations BIA Areas of Concern ^/ County Boundary Al Dil & Gas pipelines from USGS ® 100 -year flood zone ® 500 -year flood zone ■ National Wetland Inventory This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display and/or hide map information. The legend includes only those icons for the default map view. SITE NAME: Proposed Townhomes Sites at elevations higher than PSI, Inc. or equal to the target property • Sites at elevations lower than CONTACT: the target property A Manufactured Gas Plants National Priority List Sites 3396733.2s Dept. Defense Sites -42 Indian Reservations BIA Areas of Concern ^/ County Boundary Al Dil & Gas pipelines from USGS ® 100 -year flood zone ® 500 -year flood zone ■ National Wetland Inventory This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display and/or hide map information. The legend includes only those icons for the default map view. SITE NAME: Proposed Townhomes CLIENT: PSI, Inc. ADDRESS: 3303 Via Lido CONTACT: Eric Fraske Newport Beach CA 92663 INQUIRY #: 3396733.2s LAT/LONG: 33.6167 / 117.9273 DATE: August 23, 2012 2:33 pm C.Dvnaht C 20l2 EDR.1,n. 0 2010 T.I. Atlas Rel. OM009. DETAIL MAP - 3396733.2s 32'. dl '17 '31st 5, 31st St 111 _.1 4h st ✓o, h 5, r h — — 2 R 't n e s t - _. 3.g_ Lot .' H s` o ���H $1 9 gR7 � —.[ �L➢Rt SIRE HOU6E 11 1/1F 111 •. ay�...N�.,y Sites at elevations higher than PSI, Inc. or equal to the target property 3303 Via Lido Sites at elevations lower than CONTACT: the target property A Manufactured Gas Plants t Sensitive Receptors 3396733.2s National Priority List Sites 33.6167 / 117.9273 Dept. Defense Sites Indian Reservations BIA EM Areas of Concern Dil & Gas pipelines from USGS IFI' 100 -year flood zone ® 500 -year flood zone ■ National Wetland Inventory This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display and/or hide map information. The legend includes only those icons for the default map view. SITE NAME: Proposed Townhomes CLIENT: PSI, Inc. ADDRESS: 3303 Via Lido CONTACT: Eric Fraske Newport Beach CA 92663 INQUIRY #: 3396733.2s LAT/LONG: 33.6167 / 117.9273 DATE: August 23, 2012 2:35 pm C.Dvnaht C 20l2 EDR.1,n. 0 2010 T.I. Atlas Rel. MOOS. Database MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Total (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8- 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2- 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL 1.000 Proposed NPL 1.000 NPL LIENS TP Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL 1.000 Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS 0.500 FEDERAL FACILITY 1.000 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERC-NFRAP 0.500 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS 1.000 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF 0.500 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG 0.250 RCRA-SQG 0.250 RCRA-CESQG 0.250 Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 US INST CONTROL 0.500 Federal ERNS list ERNS TP State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE 1.000 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR 1.000 State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF 0.500 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST 0.500 SLIC 0.500 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 1 0 NR NR 1 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 2 0 NR NR 2 0 0 0 1 NR 1 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0 6 NR NR NR 6 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 3 1 4 NR 8 0 0 0 NR NR 0 1 8 8 NR NR 17 0 2 2 NR NR 4 TC3396733.2s Page 4 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Total Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-1 > 1 Plotted INDIAN LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST 0.250 1 7 NR NR NR 8 AST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 INDIAN UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 FEMA UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Local Lists of Landfill /Solid Waste Disposal Sites ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 WMUDS/SWAT 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 SWRCY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 HAULERS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 INDIAN ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 HIST Cal -Sites 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 SCH 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 Toxic Pits 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 CDL TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 US HIST CDL TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks CA FID UST 0.250 0 3 NR NR NR 3 HIST UST 0.250 0 4 NR NR NR 4 SWEEPS UST 0.250 0 3 NR NR NR 3 Local Land Records LIENS 2 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 LUCIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 LIENS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 DEED 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 CHMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 LDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TC3396733.2s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Iq 11:i9:1819:71SIIe\CVIC:1001S -i EDR Proprietary Records Manufactured Gas Plants 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR TC3396733.2s Page 6 Search Distance Target Total Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-1 > 1 Plotted MCS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Orange Co. Industrial Site TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Other Ascertainable Records RCRA-NonGen 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 DOT OPS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 DOD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 FUDS 1.000 0 0 0 1 NR 1 CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 UMTRA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 TRIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TSCA TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 FTTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 HIST FTTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 SSTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 ICIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 PADS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 MILTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RADINFO TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 FINDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RAATS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 CA BOND EXP. PLAN 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 NPDES TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 UIC TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 WDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Cortese 0.500 0 1 0 NR NR 1 HIST CORTESE 0.500 0 8 6 NR NR 14 Notify 65 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 DRYCLEANERS 0.250 0 3 NR NR NR 3 WIP 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 ENF TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 HAZNET TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 EMI TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 INDIAN RESERV 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 EPA WATCH LIST TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 PRP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 US FIN ASSUR TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 2020 COR ACTION 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCE TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 PCB TRANSFORMER TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 PROC 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 MWMP 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 COAL ASH DOE TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 COAL ASH EPA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 HWT 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 HWP 1.000 0 0 0 1 NR 1 Iq 11:i9:1819:71SIIe\CVIC:1001S -i EDR Proprietary Records Manufactured Gas Plants 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR TC3396733.2s Page 6 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Database (Miles) Property EDR Historical Auto Stations 0.250 EDR Historical Cleaners 0.250 NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database Total < 1/8 1/8- 1/4 1/4- 1/2 1/2- 1 > 1 Plotted 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0 NR NR NR 0 TC3396733.2s Page 7 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site Al 601 LIDO SSE 601 LIDO PARK DR <1/8 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0.097 mi. DENAMARIE BAKER 512 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster A Relative: UST: Higher Facility ID: 19436 Email: Latitude: 33.61528 Actual: Longitude: -117.92668 7 ft. Longitude: ORANGE CO. UST: Facility ID: FA0024786 A2 LIDO PARK CONDOMINIUMS SSE 601 LIDO PARK < 1/8 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0.097 mi. DENAMARIE BAKER 512 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster A Relative: LUST: Higher Region: Email: Global Id: Actual: Latitude: 7 ft. Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: Potential Contaminants of Concern: Site History: STATE T0605902220 33.615718 -117.92667 LUST Cleanup Site Completed - Case Closed 12/03/1999 ORANGE COUNTY LOP JK ORANGE COUNTY LOP 083003306T 98UT090 Local Agency Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Diesel Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility LUST: T0605902220 Global Id: T0605902220 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 Global Id: T0605902220 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: CARL BERNHARDT Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWOCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: 9517824495 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number UST 0003641141 N/A LUST 5103444592 N/A TC3396733.2s Page 8 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site LIDO PARK CONDOMINIUMS (Continued) LUST: Global Id: Action Type: Date: Action: Global Id: Action Type: Date: Action: ORANGE CO. LUST: Region: Facility Id: Current Status: Released Substance: Date Closed: Case Type: Record ID: LUST REG 8: Region: County: Regional Board: Facility Status: Case Number: Local Case Num: Case Type: Substance: Qty Leaked: Abate Method: Cross Street: Enf Type: Funding: How Discovered: How Stopped: Leak Cause: Leak Source: Global ID: How Stopped Date: Enter Date: Review Date: Prelim Assess: Discover Date: Enforcement Date: Close Date: Workplan: Pollution Char: Remed Plan: Remed Action: Monitoring: Enter Date: GW Qualifies: Soil Qualifies: Operator: T0605902220 Other 01/01/1950 Leak Discovery T0605902220 Other 01/01/1950 Leak Reported ORANGE 98UT090 Certification (Case Closed) Diesel fuel oil and additives, Nos.1-D, 2-D,2-4 12/03/1999 Other Ground Water RO0000874 8 Orange Santa Ana Region Case Closed 083003306T 98UT090 Other ground water affected Diesel 0 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Tank Closure Close Tank Unknown Unknown T0605902220 9/9/9999 Not reported Not reported Not reported 11/9/1998 Not reported 12/3/1999 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5103444592 TC3396733.2s Page 9 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site LIDO PARK CONDOMINIUMS (Continued) Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: Not reported Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: 33.6155443 Longitude: -117.9272933 MTBE Date: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Concentration: 0 Max MTBE Soil: Not reported MTBE Fuel: 0 MTBE Tested: Not Required to be Tested. MTBE Class: Staff: CAB Staff Initials: JK Lead Agency: Local Agency Local Agency: 30000L Hydr Basin #: Not reported Beneficial: MUN Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: Not reported B3 LEVON GUGASIAN SSE 634 LIDO PARK DR 118-1/4 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0.126 mi. 666 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster B Relative: UST: Lower Facility ID: 11421 Latitude: 33.61492 Actual: Longitude: -117.92646 6 ft. Reg Id: B4 DELANEYS SSE 634 LIDO PARK 118-1/4 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0.126 mi. 666 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster B Relative: CORTESE: Lower Region: Facility County Code: Actual: Reg By: 6 ft. Reg Id: LUST: Region: Global Id: Latitude: Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: CORTESE 30 LTNKA 083001822T STATE T0605901362 33.6153253 -117.9272593 LUST Cleanup Site Completed - Case Closed 02/18/1993 ORANGE COUNTY LOP JK EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5103444592 UST 0003778860 N/A HIST CORTESE 5102428705 LUST N/A TC3396733.2s Page 10 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site DELANEYS (Continued) MAP FINDINGS Local Agency: ORANGE COUNTY LOP RB Case Number: 083001822T LOC Case Number: 90UT225 File Location: Local Agency Potential Media Affect: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Potential Contaminants of Concern: Diesel Site History: Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: LUST: T0605901362 Global Id: T0605901362 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 Global Id: T0605901362 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: nolson-martin@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: Not reported LUST: Global Id: T0605901362 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605901362 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Reported ORANGE CO. LUST: Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 90UT225 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Diesel fuel oil and additives, Nos.1-D, 2-D,2-4 Date Closed: 02/18/1993 Case Type: Other Ground Water Record ID: RO0002362 LUST REG 8: Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: 083001822T EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5102428705 TC3396733.2s Page 11 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site DELANEYS (Continued) Local Case Num: Case Type: Substance: Qty Leaked: Abate Method: Cross Street: Enf Type: Funding: How Discovered: How Stopped: Leak Cause: Leak Source: Global ID: How Stopped Date: Enter Date: Review Date: Prelim Assess: Discover Date: Enforcement Date: Close Date: Workplan: Pollution Char: Remed Plan: Remed Action: Monitoring: Enter Date: GW Qualifies: Soil Qualifies: Operator: Facility Contact: Interim: Oversite Program: Latitude: Longitude: MTBE Date: Max MTBE GW: MTBE Concentration: Max MTBE Soil: MTBE Fuel: MTBE Tested: MTBE Class: Staff: Staff Initials: Lead Agency: Local Agency: Hydr Basin #: Beneficial: Priority: Cleanup Fund Id: Work Suspended: Summary: MAP FINDINGS 90UT225 Other ground water affected Diesel Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Tank Closure Close Tank Unknown Unknown T0605901362 9/9/9999 Not reported Not reported Not reported 9/6/1990 Not reported 2/18/1993 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported LUST 33.6153253 -117.9272593 Not reported Not reported 0 Not reported 0 Not Required to be Tested. NOM JK Local Agency 30000L Not reported MAR Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5102428705 TC3396733.2s Page 12 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number C5 LIDO CLEANERS Orange Co. Industrial Site NW 3424 VIA LIDO DRYCLEANERS 1/8-1/4 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 HAZNET 0.133 mi. ENVIROSTOR 700 H. Site 1 of 2 in cluster C Relative: Orange Co. Industrial Site: Higher Case ID: 071C017 Region: ORANGE Actual: Record ID: RO0003448 8ft. Current Status: CLOSED 11/1/2010 Closure Type: Closure certification issued Released Chemical: PERCHLOROETHYLENE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DRYCLEANERS: EPA Id: CAL000269620 NAICS Code: 81232 NAICS Description: Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin -Operated) SIC Code: 7211 SIC Description: Power Laundries, Family and Commercial Create Date: 04/28/2003 Facility Active: No Inactive Date: 06/30/2006 Facility Addr2: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 3424 VIA LIDO Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing State: CA Mailing Zip: 926630000 Owner Name: BYUNG JUN, CHO. Owner Address: 3424 VIA LIDO Owner Address 2: Not reported Owner Telephone: 9496731010 Contact Name: BYUNG JUN CHO. Contact Address: 3424 VIA LIDO Contact Address 2: Not reported Contact Telephone: 9496731010 HAZNET: Year: 2006 Gepaid: CAL000269620 Contact: BYUNG JUN CHO. Telephone: 9496731010 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 3424 VIA LIDO Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926630000 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: NVR000076158 TSD County: 99 Waste Category: Not reported Disposal Method: Solvents Recovery Tons: Not reported Facility County: Orange Year: 2005 Gepaid: CAL000269620 Contact: BYUNG JUN CHO. Telephone: 9496731010 5103654183 N/A TC3396733.2s Page 13 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number LIDO CLEANERS (Continued) 5103654183 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 3424 VIA LIDO Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926630000 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: NVR000076158 TSD County: 99 Waste Category: Not reported Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: Not reported Facility County: Not reported Year: 2004 Gepaid: CAL000163054 Contact: RAYMOND WU Telephone: -- Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 3424 VIA LIDO Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926630000 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: NVR000076158 TSD County: 99 Waste Category: Not reported Disposal Method: Not reported Tons: Not reported Facility County: Not reported Year: 2003 Gepaid: CAL000163054 Contact: RAYMOND WU Telephone: 0 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 3424 VIA LIDO Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926630000 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: CAD008302903 TSD County: Orange Waste Category: Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene, etc) Disposal Method: Not reported Tons: 0.12 Facility County: Orange Year: 2002 Gepaid: CAL000219308 Contact: CHARLES KIM Telephone: 9496731010 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 3424 VIA LIDO Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926630000 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: Not reported TSD County: Los Angeles Waste Category: Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene, etc) Disposal Method: Not reported Tons: Not reported Facility County: Not reported TC3396733.2s Page 14 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site LIDO CLEANERS (Continued) Click Phis� while viewing on your computer to access 18 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. ENVIROSTOR: Site Type: Site Type Detailed: Acres: NPL: Regulatory Agencies: Lead Agency: Program Manager: Supervisor: Division Branch: Facility ID: Site Code: Assembly: Senate: Special Program: Status: Status Date: Restricted Use: Site Mgmt. Req.: Funding: Latitude: Longitude: APN: Past Use: Potential COC: Confirmed COC: Potential Description: Alias Name: Alias Type: Evaluation Evaluation Not reported NO SMBRP SMBRP Not reported Not reported Cleanup Cypress 60000726 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Refer: 1248 Local Agency 08/24/2007 NO NONE SPECIFIED Not Applicable 0 0 NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED Completed Info: Completed Area Name: Completed Sub Area Name: Completed Document Type: Completed Date: Comments: Future Area Name: Future Sub Area Name: Future Document Type: Future Due Date: Schedule Area Name: Schedule Sub Area Name: Schedule Document Type: Schedule Due Date: Schedule Revised Date: 60000726 Envirostor ID Number Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5103654183 TC3396733.2s Page 15 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site C6 IMAGE GRAPHIC NW 3428 VIA LIDO 1/8-1/4 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0.134 mi. EPA ID: 708 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster C Relative: RCRA-SQG EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number RCRA-SQG 1000233302 FINDS CAD982344715 Higher Date form received by agency: 01/13/1988 Facility name: IMAGE GRAPHIC Actual: Facility address: 3428 VIA LIDO 8 ft. NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 EPA ID: CAD982344715 Mailing address: VIA LIDO No NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 Contact: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER Contact address: 3428 VIA LIDO No NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 Contact country: u5 Contact telephone: (714) 673-0920 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 09 Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time Owner/Operator Summary: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: STEVEN HUNT NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Not reported (415) 555-1212 Private Owner Not reported Not reported NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Not reported (415) 555-1212 Private Operator Not reported Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No TC3396733.2s Page 16 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number IMAGE GRAPHIC (Continued) 1000233302 Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Violation Status: No violations found FINDS: Registry ID: 110002797162 Environmental Interest/information System RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. D7 NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL West 3300 NEWPORT 1/8-1/4 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 0.173 mi. 916 H. Site 1 of 8 in cluster D Relative: CORTESE: Higher Region: Facility County Code: Actual: Reg By: 8 ft. Reg Id: LUST: Region: Global Id: Latitude: Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: HIST CORTESE 0001577422 LUST NIA HIST UST CORTESE 30 LTNKA 083000199T LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: Potential Contaminants of Concern: Site History: STATE T0605900150 33.6167772 -117.9301394 LUST Cleanup Site Completed - Case Closed 06/19/1991 ORANGE COUNTY LOP JK ORANGE COUNTY LOP 083000199T 88UT142 Local Agency Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Gasoline Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: LUST: Global Id: T0605900150 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker TC3396733.2s Page 17 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL (Continued) 0001577422 Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochr .com Phone Number: 7144336255 Global Id: T0605900150 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: PATRICIA HANNON Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: phannon@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: Not reported LUST: Global Id: T0605900150 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605900150 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Reported ORANGE CO. LUST: Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 88UT142 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 06/19/1991 Case Type: Other Ground Water Record ID: RO0002304 LUST REG 8: Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: 083000199T Local Case Num: 88UT142 Case Type: Other ground water affected Substance: Gasoline Qty Leaked: 0 Abate Method: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Enf Type: Not reported Funding: Not reported How Discovered: Tank Closure How Stopped: Close Tank Leak Cause: Unknown Leak Source: Unknown Global ID: T0605900150 TC3396733.2s Page 18 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL (Continued) How Stopped Date: Enter Date: Review Date: Prelim Assess: Discover Date: Enforcement Date: Close Date: Workplan: Pollution Char: Remed Plan: Remed Action: Monitoring: Enter Date: GW Qualifies: Soil Qualifies: Operator: Facility Contact: Interim: Oversite Program: Latitude: Longitude: MTBE Date: Max MTBE GW: MTBE Concentration: Max MTBE Soil: MTBE Fuel: MTBE Tested: MTBE Class: 9/9/9999 Not reported Not reported Not reported 8/9/1988 Not reported 6/19/1991 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported LUST 33.6167772 -117.9301394 Not reported Not reported 0 Not reported 1 Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed. Staff: PAH Staff Initials: JK Lead Agency: Local Agency Local Agency: 30000L Hydr Basin #: Not reported Beneficial: MAR Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: Not reported HIST UST: Region: Facility ID: Facility Type: Other Type: Total Tanks: Contact Name: Telephone: Owner Name: STATE 00000057040 Other CITY HALL 0001 MELKOEHN 7146443080 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Owner Address: 3300 NEWPORT BLVD. Owner City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926588915 Tank Num: 001 Container Num: 8 Year Installed: Not reported Tank Capacity: 00010000 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: UNLEADED EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 0001577422 TC3396733.2s Page 19 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL (Continued) Tank Construction: Not reported Leak Detection: Stock Inventor D8 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH West 3300 NEWPORT BLVD 118-114 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0.173 mi. 916 ft. Site 2 of 8 in cluster D Relative: UST: Higher Facility ID: 7240 Latitude: 33.61674 Actual: Longitude: -117.93029 8 ft. ORANGE CO. UST: Facility ID: FA0056623 SWEEPS UST: Status: Comp Number: Number: Board Of Equalization: Ref Date: Act Date: Created Date: Tank Status: Owner Tank Id: Swrcb Tank Id: Actv Date: Capacity: Tank Use: Stg: Content: Number Of Tanks: HAZNET: Year: Gepaid: Contact: Telephone: Mailing Name: Mailing Address: Mailing City,St,Zip: Gen County: TSD EPA ID: TSD County: Waste Category: Disposal Method: Tons: Facility County: A 7240 9 44-016586 09-30-92 09-15-92 02-29-88 A Not reported 30-000-007240-000001 Not reported 12000 M.V. FUEL P REG UNLEADED 1 2005 CAC002594516 JESSICA ETEZADY 9496443335 Not reported 3300 NEWPORT BLVD NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926633816 Orange CAT080013352 Los Angeles Tank bottom waste Not reported 0.62 Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 0001577422 UST 0003804560 SWEEPS UST N/A HAZNET TC3396733.2s Page 20 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site D9 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH West 3300 NEWPORT BLVD 1/8-1/4 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0.173 mi. EPA ID: 916 ft. Site 3 of 8 in cluster D Relative: CA FID UST: Higher Facility ID: Regulated By: Actual: Regulated ID: 8 ft. Cortese Code: SIC Code: Facility Phone: Mail To: Mailing Address: Mailing Address 2: Mailing City,St,Zip: Contact: Contact Phone: DUNS Number: NPDES Number: EPA ID: Comments: Status: 30016503 UTNKA Not reported Not reported Not reported 7146443080 Not reported 3300 NEWPORT BLVD P O BOX Not reported NEWPORT BEACH 92663 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Active D10 WORLD OIL CO WNW 3401 NEWPORT B;VD 118-114 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0.182 mi. EPA ID: 960 ft. Site 4 of 8 in cluster D Relative: RCRA-SQG EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number CA FID UST 0001559686 N/A RCRA-SQG 1000276365 FINDS CAD981160633 HIST UST HAZNET Higher Date form received by agency: 09/01/1996 Facility name: WORLD OIL CO Actual: Facility address: 3401 NEWPORT B;VD 8 ft. NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 EPA ID: CAD981160633 Mailing address: 9302 S GARFIELD SOUTH GATE, CA 90280 Contact: Not reported Contact address: Not reported Not reported Contact country: Not reported Contact telephone: Not reported Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 09 Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time Owner/Operator Summary Owner/operator name: WORLD OIL MARKETING CO #42 Owner/operator address: NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: (415) 555-1212 TC3396733.2s Page 21 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site WORLD OIL CO (Continued) Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: MAP FINDINGS Private Owner Not reported Not reported NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Not reported (415)555-1212 Private Operator Not reported Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Historical Generators: Date form received by agency: 10/29/1985 Facility name: WORLD OIL CO Classification: Large Quantity Generator Violation Status: FINDS: Registry ID: No violations found 110002678255 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Environmental Interest/Information System California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal facilities. RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. 1000278365 TC3396733.2s Page 22 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number WORLD OIL CO (Continued) 1000278365 HIST UST: Container Num: Region: STATE Facility ID: 00000013725 Facility Type: Gas Station Other Type: Not reported Total Tanks: 0003 Contact Name: RON COLEMAN Telephone: 2135608801 Owner Name: WORLD OIL MARKETING COMPANY Owner Address: 9302 S. GARFIELD AVENUE Owner City,St,Zip: SOUTH GATE, CA 90280 Tank Num: 001 Container Num: 4201 Year Installed: Not reported Tank Capacity: 00010000 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: REGULAR Tank Construction: Not reported Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Tank Num: 002 Container Num: 4202 Year Installed: Not reported Tank Capacity: 00012000 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: UNLEADED Tank Construction: Not reported Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Tank Num: 003 Container Num: 4203 Year Installed: Not reported Tank Capacity: 00010000 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: 06 Tank Construction: Not reported Leak Detection: Stock Inventor HAZNET: Year: 2011 Gepaid: CAD981160633 Contact: JOHN P HUNDLEYNICE PRESIDENT Telephone: 5629280100 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 9302 S GARFIELD AVE Mailing City,St,Zip: SOUTH GATE, CA 902801966 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: NVT330010000 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Other organic solids Disposal Method: Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be Closed As Landfill(To Include On -Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) Tons: 0.1 Facility County: Orange TC3396733.2s Page 23 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number WORLD OIL CO (Continued) 1000278365 Year: 2011 Gepaid: CAD981160633 Contact: JOHN P HUNDLEYNICE PRESIDENT Telephone: 5629280100 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 9302 S GARFIELD AVE Mailing City,St,Zip: SOUTH GATE, CA 902801966 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAT080013352 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent Disposal Method: Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect Tons: 1.449 Facility County: Orange Year: 2010 Gepaid: CAD981160633 Contact: JOHN P HUNDLEYNICE PRESIDENT Telephone: 5629280100 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 9302 S GARFIELD AVE Mailing City,St,Zip: SOUTH GATE, CA 902801966 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAT080013352 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent Disposal Method: Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect Tons: 0.063 Facility County: Orange Year: 2009 Gepaid: CAD981160633 Contact: JOHN P HUNDLEYNICE PRESIDENT Telephone: 5629280100 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 9302 S GARFIELD AVE Mailing City,St,Zip: SOUTH GATE, CA 902801966 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: NVT330010000 TSD County: 99 Waste Category: Other organic solids Disposal Method: Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be Closed As Landfll(To Include On -Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) Tons: 0.035 Facility County: Orange Year: 2009 Gepaid: CAD981160633 Contact: JOHN P HUNDLEYNICE PRESIDENT Telephone: 5629280100 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 9302 S GARFIELD AVE Mailing City,St,Zip: SOUTH GATE, CA 902801966 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: CAT080013352 TC3396733.2s Page 24 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site D11 WNW 118-114 0.182 mi. 960 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 8 ft. WORLD OIL CO (Continued) MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number TSD County: Los Angeles Waste Category: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent Disposal Method: Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect Tons: 0.525 Facility County: Orange Clerk this hyppriank while viewing on your computer to access 19 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. WORLD OIL STATION #42 3401 NEWPORT BLVD NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 Site 5 of 8 in cluster D UST: Facility ID: 4851 Latitude: 33.61731 Longitude: -117.93041 ORANGE CO. UST: Facility ID: FA0024227 SWEEPS UST: Status: Comp Number: Number: Board Of Equalization: Ref Date: Act Date: Created Date: Tank Status: Owner Tank Id: Swrcb Tank Id: Actv Date: Capacity: Tank Use: Stg: Content: Number Of Tanks: Status: Comp Number: Number: Board Of Equalization: Ref Date: Act Date: Created Date: Tank Status: Owner Tank Id: Swrcb Tank Id: Actv Date: Capacity: Tank Use: Stg: Content: Not reported 4851 Not reported 44-016284 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 30-000-004851-000004 Not reported 280 UNKNOWN PRODUCT Not reported 1 A 4851 9 44-016284 09-30-92 09-15-92 02-29-88 A Not reported 30-000-004851-000001 Not reported 10000 M.V. FUEL P REG UNLEADED 1000278365 UST 0003949239 SWEEPS UST NIA TC3396733.2s Page 25 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site WORLD OIL STATION #42 (Continued) Number Of Tanks: Status: Comp Number: Number: Board Of Equalization: Ref Date: Act Date: Created Date: Tank Status: Owner Tank Id: Swrcb Tank Id: Actv Date: Capacity: Tank Use: Stg: Content: Number Of Tanks: Status: Comp Number: Number: Board Of Equalization: Ref Date: Act Date: Created Date: Tank Status: Owner Tank Id: Swrcb Tank Id: Actv Date: Capacity: Tank Use: Stg: Content: Number Of Tanks: 3 A 4851 9 44-016284 09-30-92 09-15-92 02-29-88 A Not reported 30-000-004851-000002 Not reported 12000 M.V. FUEL P REG UNLEADED Not reported A 4851 9 44-016284 09-30-92 09-15-92 02-29-88 A Not reported 30-000-004851-000003 Not reported 10000 M.V. FUEL P REG UNLEADED Not reported D12 WORLD OIL STATION #42 Region: West 3401 NEWPORT BLVD T0605901106 118-1/4 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 Longitude: 0.182 mi. Case Type: LUST Cleanup Site 963 ft. Site 6 of 8 in cluster D Status Date: Relative: CORTESE: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Higher Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 30 Actual: Reg By: LTNKA 8 ft. Reg Id: 083001456T LUST: Region: STATE Global Id: T0605901106 Latitude: 33.6172342 Longitude: -117.9305584 Case Type: LUST Cleanup Site Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 06/15/2004 Lead Agency: ORANGE COUNTY LOP EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HIST CORTESE LUST CA FID UST 0003949239 5101609672 N/A TC3396733.2s Page 26 Map ID T0605901106 MAP FINDINGS Direction Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Distance DENAMARIE BAKER EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number City: WORLD OIL STATION #42 (Continued) 5101609672 dbaker@ochca.com Case Worker: JK Action Type: Local Agency: ORANGE COUNTY LOP 01/01/1950 RB Case Number: 083001456T LOC Case Number: 90UT057 File Location: Local Agency Warehouse Potential Media Affect: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Potential Contaminants of Concern: Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / Lubricating, Gasoline Site History: Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility LUST: T0605901106 Global Id: T0605901106 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 Global Id: T0605901106 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: TOM E. MBEKE-EKANEM Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: tmbeke-ekanem@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: 9513202007 LUST: T0605901106 Global Id: T0605901106 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 06/15/2004 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Global Id: T0605901106 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 06/15/2004 Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter Global Id: T0605901106 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 03/19/1992 Action: Court Injunction Global Id: T0605901106 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605901106 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Reported ;eirmir UI:11M*161ifGl:: TC3396733.2s Page 27 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number WORLD OIL STATION #42 (Continued) Action Type: Date: Action: Global Id: Action Type: Date: Action: ORANGE CO. LUST: Region: Facility Id: Current Status: Released Substance: Date Closed: Case Type: Record ID: Region: Facility Id: Current Status: Released Substance: Date Closed: Case Type: Record ID: LUST REG 8: Region: County: Regional Board: Facility Status: Case Number: Local Case Num: Case Type: Substance: Qty Leaked: Abate Method: Cross Street: Enf Type: Funding: How Discovered: How Stopped: Leak Cause: Leak Source: Global ID: How Stopped Date: Enter Date: Review Date: Prelim Assess: Discover Date: Enforcement Date: Close Date: Workplan: Pollution Char: Remed Plan: REMEDIATION 01/01/1950 Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) T0605901106 REMEDIATION 01/01/1950 Other (Use Description Field) ORANGE 90UT057 Certification (Case Closed) Waste oil/Used oil 06/15/2004 Other Ground Water RO0002273 ORANGE 90UT057 Not reported Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded 06/15/2004 Not reported RO0002273 8 Orange Santa Ana Region Case Closed 083001456T 90UT057 Other ground water affected 12035,800661 0 Not reported Not reported CLOS Not reported Nuisance Conditions CF Corrosion Tank T0605901106 9/9/9999 Not reported Not reported Not reported 11/13/1989 Not reported 6/15/2004 Not reported Not reported Not reported 5101609672 TC3396733.2s Page 28 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS 30001002 WORLD OIL STATION #42 (Continued) Regulated ID: Remed Action: Not reported Not reported Monitoring: 10/28/1999 Facility Phone: Enter Date: Not reported Not reported GW Qualifies: _ Mailing Address 2: Soil Qualifies: Not reported NEWPORT BEACH 92663 Operator: Not reported Contact Phone: Facility Contact: Not reported Not reported Interim: Not reported EPA ID: Oversite Program: LUST Not reported Latitude: 33.6172342 Longitude: -117.9305584 MTBE Date: 2/4/2002 Max MTBE GW: 36000 MTBE Concentration: 0 Max MTBE Soil: Not reported MTBE Fuel: 0 MTBE Tested: MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detected MTBE Class: Staff: TME Staff Initials: JK Lead Agency: Local Agency Local Agency: 30000L Hydr Basin #: Not reported Beneficial: MAR,NAV,RARE,REC-1,REC-2,SHELL,SPWN,WILD Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: Not reported CA FID UST: Facility ID: 30001002 Regulated By: UTNKA Regulated ID: Not reported Cortese Code: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported Facility Phone: 7146753982 Mail To: Not reported Mailing Address: ATTN: GIL JUAREZ 930 Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH 92663 Contact: Not reported Contact Phone: Not reported DUNS Number: Not reported NPDES Number: Not reported EPA ID: Not reported Comments: Not reported Status: Active EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5101609672 TC3396733.2s Page 29 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number D13 KEREN FLEMING DRYCLEANERS 5105266612 West 3305 NEWPORT BEACH UNIT C HAZNET NIA 1/8-1/4 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0.185 mi. 975 ft. Site 7 of 8 in cluster D Relative: DRYCLEANERS: Higher EPA Id: NAICS Code: Actual: NAICS Description: 7 ft. SIC Code: SIC Description: Create Date: Facility Active: Inactive Date: Facility Addr2: Mailing Name: Mailing Address: Mailing Address 2: Mailing State: Mailing Zip: Owner Name: Owner Address: Owner Address 2: Owner Telephone: Contact Name: Contact Address: Contact Address 2: Contact Telephone: HAZNET: Year: Gepaid: Contact: Telephone: Mailing Name: Mailing Address: Mailing City,St,Zip: Gen County: TSD EPA ID: TSD County: Waste Category: Disposal Method: Tons: Facility County: Year: Gepaid: Contact: Telephone: Mailing Name: Mailing Address: Mailing City,St,Zip: Gen County: TSD EPA ID: TSD County: Waste Category: Disposal Method: Tons: CAL000183665 81232 Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin -Operated) 7211 Power Laundries, Family and Commercial 12/17/2001 No 06/30/2003 Not reported Not reported 3305 NEWPORT BEACH UNIT C Not reported CA 926630000 TED DEMIRCIAN 3305 NEWPORT BEACH UNIT C Not reported 0000000000 TED DEMIRCIAN- OWNER 3305 NEWPORT BEACH UNIT C Not reported 9496754072 2003 CAC002563667 KEREN FLEMING 9497055006 Not reported 3305 NEWPORT BEACH UNIT C NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926630000 Orange CAT000613893 Orange Liquids with halogenated organic compounds >= 1,000 Mg./L Transfer Station 0.39 Orange 2002 CAL000183665 TED DEMIRCIAN- OWNER 9496754072 Not reported 3305 NEWPORT BEACH UNIT C NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926630000 Orange Not reported Orange Liquids with halogenated organic compounds >= 1,000 Mg./L Transfer Station 0.07 TC3396733.2s Page 30 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site D14 West 118-114 0.185 mi. 975 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 7 ft. KEREN FLEMING (Continued) Facility County: Not reported PENINSULA CLEANERS 3305 NEWPORT BLVD NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5105266612 RCRA-SQG 1000857953 FINDS CAD983674086 HAZNET Site 8 of 8 in cluster D ARMAN MERCIYAN RCRA-SQG: 3305 NEWPORT BLVD Date form received by agency: 09110/1993 Facility name: PENINSULA CLEANERS Facility address: 3305 NEWPORT BLVD (714) 723-1803 STE C AND D Private NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 EPA ID: CAD983674086 Mailing address: NEWPORT BLVD Not reported STE C AND D No NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 Contact: JAKLIN MERCIYAN Contact address: 3305 NEWPORT BLVD STE C AND D No NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 Contact country: US Contact telephone: (714) 723-1803 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 09 Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time Owner/Operator Summary Owner/operator name: ARMAN MERCIYAN Owner/operator address: 3305 NEWPORT BLVD Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: (714) 723-1803 Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner Owner/Op start date: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No TC3396733.2s Page 31 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site PENINSULA CLEANERS (Continued) Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Violation Status: FINDS: Registry ID: No violations found 110002903467 Environmental Interest/information System EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Year: RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Gepaid: Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of Contact: events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Telephone: and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA Mailing Name: program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and Mailing Address: corrective action activities required under RCRA. HAZNET: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926633828 Year: 2001 Gepaid: CAD983674086 Contact: AIRMAN MERCIYAN Telephone: 7147231803 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 3305 NEWPORT BLVD Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926633828 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: Not reported TSD County: 99 Waste Category: Liquids with halogenated organic compounds >= 1,000 Mg./L Disposal Method: Invalid Code Tons: 0.3 Facility County: Not reported Year: 1996 Gepaid: CAD983674086 Contact: ARMAN MERCIYAN Telephone: 7147231803 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 3305 NEWPORT BLVD Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926633828 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: CAD981397417 TSD County: Los Angeles Waste Category: Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene, etc) Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: .6507 Facility County: Orange 1000857953 TC3396733.2s Page 32 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site E15 CHEVRON STATION #97100 WNW 3531 NEWPORT 118-1/4 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0.198 mi. NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 1048 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster E Relative: UST: Higher Facility ID: 3963 Latitude: 33.61812 Actual: Longitude: -117.93031 9 ft. Region: E16 CHEVRON #7100 WNW 3531 NEWPORT Contact Type: 118-1/4 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 DENAMARIE BAKER 0.198 mi. ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1048 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster E Relative: CORTESE: Higher Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 30 Actual: Reg By: LTNKA 9 ft. Reg Id: 083000104T LUST: Region: Global Id: Latitude: Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: Potential Contaminants of Concern: Site History: EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number UST 0004049660 N/A HIST CORTESE 5104760689 LUST N/A STATE T0605900081 33.618137 -117.930436 LUST Cleanup Site Completed - Case Closed 08/13/2001 ORANGE COUNTY LOP JK ORANGE COUNTY LOP 083000104T 85UT010 Local Agency Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Diesel, Gasoline Not reported Click here to access the California Geo -Tracker records for this facility: LUST: Global Id: T0605900081 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: Email: Phone Number: Global Id: Contact Type: Contact Name: Organization Name: Address: City: Email: SANTA ANA dbaker@ochca.com 7144336255 T0605900081 Regional Board Caseworker TOM E. MBEKE-EKANEM SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 RIVERSIDE tmbeke-ekanem@waterboards.ca.gov TC3396733.2s Page 33 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number CHEVRON #7100 (Continued) 5104760689 Phone Number: 9513202007 LUST: T0605900081 Global Id: T0605900081 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Excavation Global Id: T0605900081 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Excavation Global Id: T0605900081 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Free Product Removal Global Id: T0605900081 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605900081 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Reported ORANGE CO. LUST: ORANGE Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 85UT010 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Diesel fuel oil and additives, Nos.1-D, 2-D,2-4 Date Closed: 08/13/2001 Case Type: Other Ground Water Record ID: RO0000992 Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 85UT010 Current Status: Not reported Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 08/13/2001 Case Type: Not reported Record ID: RO0000992 LUST REG 8: Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: 083000104T Local Case Num: 85UT010 Case Type: Other ground water affected Substance: 12034,800661 Qty Leaked: 0 TC3396733.2s Page 34 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site CHEVRON #7100 (Continued) Abate Method: Cross Street: Enf Type: Funding: How Discovered: How Stopped: Leak Cause: Leak Source: Global ID: How Stopped Date: Enter Date: Review Date: Prelim Assess: Discover Date: Enforcement Date: Close Date: Workplan: Pollution Char: Remed Plan: Remed Action: Monitoring: Enter Date: GW Qualifies: Soil Qualifies: Operator: Facility Contact: Interim: Oversite Program: Latitude: Longitude: MTBE Date: Max MTBE GW: MTBE Concentration: Max MTBE Soil: MTBE Fuel: MTBE Tested: MTBE Class: Staff: Staff Initials: Lead Agency: Local Agency: Hydr Basin #: Beneficial: Priority: Cleanup Fund Id: Work Suspended: Summary: Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Tank Closure Close Tank Unknown Unknown T0605900081 9/9/9999 Not reported Not reported Not reported 1/22/1985 Not reported 8/13/2001 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported LUST 33.6184712 -117.9303944 Not reported Not reported 0 Not reported 0 Not Required to be Tested. TME JK Local Agency 30000L Not reported MAR Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5104760689 TC3396733.2s Page 35 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site 17 CAGNEYTRUST WSW SW CORNER OF 32ND ST & NEWPORT BLVD. 1/8-1/4 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0.199 mi. EPA ID: 1051 ft. Actual: EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number CERCLIS 1000855947 FINDS CA0000187997 Relative: CERCLIS: Higher Site ID: 0904996 EPA ID: CA0000187997 Actual: Facility County: ORANGE 9 ft. Short Name: CAGNEY TRUST Congressional District: 40 IFMS ID: Not reported SMSA Number: 0360 USGC Hydro Unit: Not reported Federal Facility: Not a Federal Facility DMNSN Number: Not reported She Orphan Flag: N RCRA ID: Not reported USGS Quadrangle: Not reported Site Init By Prog: Not reported NFRAP Flag: Not reported Parent ID: Not reported RST Code: Not reported EPA Region: 09 Classification: Not reported Site Settings Code: Not reported NPL Status: Not on the NPL DMNSN Unit Code: Not reported RBRAC Code: Not reported RResp Fed Agency Code: Not reported Non NPL Status: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing information Non NPL Status Date: 20000911 Site Fips Code: 06059 CC Concurrence Date: Not reported CC Concurrence FY: Not reported Alias EPA ID: Not reported Site FUDS Flag: Not reported CERCLIS Site Contact Name(s): Contact ID: 9271184.00000 Contact Name: Karen Jurist Contact Tel: (415) 972-3219 Contact Title: Site Assessment Manager (SAM) Contact Email: Not reported Contact ID: 13003854.00000 Contact Name: Leslie Ramirez Contact Tel: (415) 972-3978 Contact Title: Site Assessment Manager (SAM) Contact Email: Not reported Contact ID: 13003858.00000 Contact Name: Sharon Murray Contact Tel: (415) 972-4250 Contact Title: Site Assessment Manager (SAM) Contact Email: Not reported Contact ID: 13004003.00000 TC3396733.2s Page 36 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site CAGNEY TRUST (Continued) Contact Name: Contact Tel: Contact Title: Contact Email: MAP FINDINGS Carl Brickner Not reported Site Assessment Manager (SAM) Not reported Alias Comments: Not reported Site Description: Not reported CERCLIS Assessment History: Date Started: Action Code: 001 Action: DISCOVERY Date Started: Not reported Date Completed: 03/25/1994 Priority Level: Not reported Operable Unit: SITEWIDE Primary Responsibility: EPA Fund -Financed Planning Status: Not reported Urgency Indicator: Not reported Action Anomaly: Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Action Code: 001 Action: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT Date Started: 02/23/1999 Date Completed: 08/30/1999 Priority Level: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing information Operable Unit: SITEWIDE Primary Responsibility: EPA Fund -Financed Planning Status: Not reported Urgency Indicator: Not reported Action Anomaly: Not reported FINDS: Registry ID: 110009266098 Environmental Interest/information System CERCLIS (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System) is the Superfund database that is used to support management in all phases of the Supertund program. The system contains information on all aspects of hazardous waste sites, including an inventory of sites, planned and actual site activities, and financial information. E18 97100 WNW 3531 NEWPORT BLVD 118-114 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 0.201 mi. Not reported 1060 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster E Relative: HIST UST Higher Region: STATE Facility ID: 00000062959 Actual: Facility Type: Gas Station 9f. Other Type: Not reported 1000855947 HIST UST 0001577427 NIA TC3396733.2s Page 37 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site 97100 (Continued) Total Tanks: 0004 Contact Name: TESCHNER,BEN Telephone: 7146738131 Owner Name: CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. Owner Address: 575 MARKET Owner City,St,Zip: SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 Tank Num: 001 Container Num: 1 Year Installed: Not reported Tank Capacity: 00010000 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: Not reported Tank Construction: 0000370 unknown Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Tank Num: 002 Container Num: 2 Year Installed: Not reported Tank Capacity: 00010000 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: Not reported Tank Construction: 0000370 unknown Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Tank Num: 003 Container Num: 3 Year Installed: Not reported Tank Capacity: 00010000 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: Not reported Tank Construction: 0000370 unknown Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Tank Num: 004 Container Num: 4 Year Installed: Not reported Tank Capacity: 00001000 Tank Used for: WASTE Type of Fuel: Not reported Tank Construction: 0000370 unknown Leak Detection: Stock Inventor F19 MOBIL NW 3600 NEWPORT 118-114 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92659 0.212 mi. 1120 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster F Relative: CORTESE: Higher Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 30 Actual: Reg By: LTNKA 12 ft. Reg Id: 083001790T LUST: Region: STATE EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 0001577427 HIST CORTESE 5103696023 LUST N/A TC3396733.2s Page 38 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MOBIL (Continued) Global Id: Latitude: Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: Potential Contaminants of Concern: Site History: MAP FINDINGS T0605901340 33.618978 -117.929807 LUST Cleanup Site Completed - Case Closed 12/17/1993 ORANGE COUNTY LOP JK ORANGE COUNTY LOP 083001790T 91UT031 Local Agency Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / Lubricating, Gasoline Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility LUST: T0605901340 Global Id: T0605901340 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 Global Id: T0605901340 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: ROSE SCOTT Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: rsoott@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: 9513206375 LUST: Global Id: T0605901340 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605901340 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Reported ORANGE CO. LUST: Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 91 UT031 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Waste oil/Used oil Date Closed: 12/17/1993 Case Type: Other Ground Water Record ID: RO0001617 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5103696023 TC3396733.2s Page 39 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MOBIL (Continued) MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 91 UT031 Current Status: Not reported Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 12/17/1993 Case Type: Not reported Record ID: RO0001617 LUST REG 8: Region: County: Regional Board: Facility Status: Case Number: Local Case Num: Case Type: Substance: Qty Leaked: Abate Method: Cross Street: Enf Type: Funding: How Discovered: How Stopped: Leak Cause: Leak Source: Global ID: How Stopped Date: Enter Date: Review Date: Prelim Assess: Discover Date: Enforcement Date: Close Date: Workplan: Pollution Char: Remed Plan: Remed Action: Monitoring: Enter Date: GW Qualifies: Soil Qualifies: Operator: Facility Contact: Interim: Oversite Program: Latitude: Longitude: MTBE Date: Max MTBE GW: MTBE Concentration: Max MTBE Soil: MTBE Fuel: MTBE Tested: MTBE Class: Staff: Staff Initials: 8 Orange Santa Ana Region Case Closed 083001790T 91UT031 Other ground water affected 12035,800661 0 Not reported Not reported NONE Not reported Tank Closure Close Tank Unknown Unknown T0605901340 9/9/9999 Not reported Not reported Not reported 2/13/1991 Not reported 11/23/1993 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported LUST 33.6176592 -117.9300844 Not reported Not reported 0 Not reported 0 Not Required to be Tested. RS JK 5103696023 TC3396733.2s Page 40 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number MOBIL (Continued) 5103696023 Lead Agency: Local Agency Local Agency: 30000L Hydr Basin #: Not reported Beneficial: MAR Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: Not reported F20 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Region: UST 0003779904 NW 3600 NEWPORT BLVD 33.6264275 Longitude: N/A 1/8-1/4 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 0.212 mi. Lead Agency: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Case Worker: JK 1120 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster F RB Case Number: 083001016T LOC Case Number: Relative: UST: Local Agency Potential Media Affect: Soil Higher Facility ID: 2200 Site History: Not reported Latitude: 33.6189 Actual: Longitude: -117.92998 12 ft. G21 GERMAN AUTOS HIST CORTESE 5102430749 SW 3000 NEWPORT LUST N/A 1/8-1/4 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 HAZNET 0.218 mi. 1150 ft. Site 1 of 5 in cluster G Relative: CORTESE: Higher Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 30 Actual: Reg By: LTNKA 9 ft. Reg Id: 083001016T LUST: Region: STATE Global Id: T0605900804 Latitude: 33.6264275 Longitude: -117.8822795 Case Type: LUST Cleanup Site Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 08/05/1988 Lead Agency: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Case Worker: JK Local Agency: ORANGE COUNTY LOP RB Case Number: 083001016T LOC Case Number: 88UT124 File Location: Local Agency Potential Media Affect: Soil Potential Contaminants of Concern: Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / Lubricating Site History: Not reported Click here to access the Califomia GeoTracker records for this facility: LUST: Global Id: T0605900804 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER TC3396733.2s Page 41 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site GERMAN AUTOS (Continued) Organization Name: Address: City: Email: Phone Number: Global Id: Contact Type: Contact Name: Organization Name: Address: City: Email: Phone Number: LUST: Global Id: Action Type: Date: Action: Global Id: Action Type: Date: Action: ORANGE CO. LUST: Region: Facility Id: Current Status: Released Substance: Date Closed: Case Type: Record ID: HAZNET: Year: Gepaid: Contact: Telephone: Mailing Name: Mailing Address: Mailing City,St,Zip: Gen County: TSD EPA ID: TSD County: Waste Category: Disposal Method: Tons: Facility County: MAP FINDINGS ORANGE COUNTY LOP 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 SANTA ANA dbaker@ochca.com 7144336255 T0605900804 Regional Board Caseworker PATRICIA HANNON SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 RIVERSIDE phannon@waterboards.ca.gov Not reported T0605900804 Other 01/01/1950 Leak Discovery T0605900804 Other 01/01/1950 Leak Reported ORANGE 88UT124 Certification (Case Closed) Waste oil/Used oil 08/05/1988 Soil Only RO0001824 2000 CAC002270601 THOMAS BLUROCK 9496469373 Not reported 247 PROSPECT ST NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926630000 Orange AZD983473539 99 Polychlorinated biphenyls and material containing PCBs Recycler .8428 Orange EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5102430749 TC3396733.2s Page 42 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number G22 GERMAN AUTOS LUST 0003784517 SW 3000 NEWPORT BLVD UST N/A 1/8-1/4 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0.218 mi. 1150 ft. Site 2 of 5 in cluster G Relative: LUST REG 8: Higher Region: 8 County: Orange Actual: Regional Board: Santa Ana Region 9 ft. Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: 083001016T Local Case Num: 88UT124 Case Type: Soil only Substance: Waste Oil Qty Leaked: 0 Abate Method: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Ent Type: Not reported Funding: Not reported How Discovered: Tank Closure How Stopped: Close Tank Leak Cause: Unknown Leak Source: Unknown Global ID: T0605900804 How Stopped Date: 9/9/9999 Enter Date: Not reported Review Date: Not reported Prelim Assess: Not reported Discover Date: 6/30/1988 Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: 8/5/1988 Workplan: Not reported Pollution Char: Not reported Remed Plan: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported GW Qualifies: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported Operator: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: Not reported Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: 33.6150953 Longitude: -117.9301324 MTBE Date: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Concentration: 0 Max MTBE Soil: Not reported MTBE Fuel: 0 MTBE Tested: Not Required to be Tested. MTBE Class: Staff: PAH Staff Initials: JK Lead Agency: Local Agency Local Agency: 30000L Hydr Basin #: Not reported Beneficial: MUN TC3396733.2s Page 43 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number GERMAN AUTOS (Continued) 0003784517 Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: Not reported UST: Facility ID: 8183 Latitude: 33.61472 Longitude: -117.93023 H23 NEWPORT PLATING CO #3 CERC-NFRAP 1003879086 SSW 2815 VILLA WAY CAD982360414 118-114 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92661 Not reported 0.226 mi. ARCHIVE SITE Date Started: 1191 ft. Site 1 of 5 in cluster H 10/01/1988 Relative: CERC-NFRAP: Action: Higher Site ID: 0902599 Date Completed: Federal Facility: Not a Federal Facility Actual: NPL Status: Not on the NPL 7 ft. Non NPL Status: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing information CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Contact Details: Contact Sequence ID: 13052145.00000 Person ID: 9271184.00000 Contact Sequence ID: 13290452.00000 Person ID: 13003854.00000 Contact Sequence ID: 13296047.00000 Person ID: 13003858.00000 Contact Sequence ID: 13301905.00000 Person ID: 13004003.00000 CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History: Action: DISCOVERY Date Started: Not reported Date Completed: 11/01/1987 Priority Level: Not reported Action: ARCHIVE SITE Date Started: Not reported Date Completed: 10/01/1988 Priority Level: Not reported Action: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT Date Started: Not reported Date Completed: 10/01/1988 Priority Level: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing information TC3396733.2s Page 44 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site H24 SSW 118-1/4 0.226 mi 1191 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 7 ft. NEWPORT PLATING COMPANY #3 2815 VILLA WAY NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92661 Site 2 of 5 in cluster H ENVIROSTOR: Site Type: Site Type Detailed: Acres: NPL: Regulatory Agencies: Lead Agency: Program Manager: Supervisor: Division Branch: Facility ID: Site Code: Assembly: Senate: Special Program: Status: Status Date: Restricted Use: Site Mgmt. Req.: Funding: Latitude: Longitude: APN: Past Use: Potential COC: Confirmed COC: Potential Description: Alias Name: Alias Type: Alias Name: Alias Type: Alias Name: Alias Type: MAP FINDINGS Historical . Historical Not reported NO NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED Not reported Referred - Not Assigned Cleanup Cypress 30340151 Not reported 74 37 ' CERC2 Refer: RCRA 08/26/1988 NO NONE SPECIFIED Not reported 33.61350 -117.9283 NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED CALDWELL PLATING Alternate Name CAD982360414 EPA Identification Number 30340151 Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: . Discovery Completed Date: 08/01/1981 Comments: FACILITY IDENTIFIED PHONE CO. SEARCH. EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number ENVIROSTOR 1000348933 N/A Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Site Screening Completed Date: 08/26/1988 Comments: SITE SCREENING DONE NFA UNDER CERCLA; PENDING STATUS FOR DHS BECAUSE RCRA REGULATED FACILITY. Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Preliminary Assessment Report Completed Date: 10/19/1987 Comments: PRELIM ASSESS DONE NO EVIDENCE OF NEWPORT PLATING EVER BEING AT 2815 VILLA WAY TC3396733.2s Page 45 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site NEWPORT PLATING COMPANY #3 (Continued) Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Site Screening Completed Date: 05/13/1987 Comments: SITE SCREENING DONE CERCLA GRANT PA REQ'D. Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported G25 UNOCAL #5310 SW 3001 NEWPORT BLVD # 5310 118-114 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0.230 mi. NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 1215 ft. Site 3 of 5 in cluster G Relative: UST: Higher Facility ID: 4852 Status Date: Latitude: 33.61463 Actual: Longitude: -117.93043 8 ft. Region: G26 UNOCAL #5310 Region: SW 3001 NEWPORT BLVD T0605937174 1/8-1/4 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 Longitude: 0.230 mi. Case Type: LUST Cleanup Site 1215 ft. Site 4 of 5 in cluster G Status Date: Relative: CORTESE: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Higher Region: CORTESE ORANGE COUNTY LOP Facility County Code: 30 Actual: Reg By: LTNKA 8 ft. Reg Id: 083001981T Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 30 Reg By: LTNKA Reg Id: 083000431T LUST: Region: STATE Global Id: T0605937174 Latitude: 33.614688 Longitude: -117.9306 Case Type: LUST Cleanup Site Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 09/16/1986 Lead Agency: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Case Worker: JK Local Agency: ORANGE COUNTY LOP RB Case Number: Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000348933 UST 0003982075 N/A HIST CORTESE 5101588955 LUST N/A CA FID UST SWEEPS UST TC3396733.2s Page 46 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number UNOCAL #5310 (Continued) LOC Case Number: 86UT008 File Location: Local Agency Potential Media Affect: Under Investigation Potential Contaminants of Concern: Gasoline Site History: Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: LUST: Email: Global Id: T0605937174 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 Global Id: T0605937174 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: nolson-martin@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: Not reported Region: STATE Global Id: T0605900346 Latitude: 33.6150293 Longitude: -117.9304954 Case Type: LUST Cleanup Site Status: Open - Remediation Status Date: 08/19/1993 Lead Agency: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Case Worker: DB Local Agency: ORANGE COUNTY LOP RB Case Number: 083000431T LOC Case Number: 89UT089 File Location: Local Agency Potential Media Affect: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Potential Contaminants of Concern: Gasoline Site History: Please refer to recent Site Documents or Monitoring Reports in GeoTracker for site history. Orange County is not responsible for the accuracy of any professional interpretations provided in reports submitted by consultants for the responsible party. Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility LUST: Global Id: T0605900346 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: nolson-martin@waterboards.ca.gov 5101588955 TC3396733.2s Page 47 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number UNOCAL#5310 (Continued) 5101588955 Phone Number: Not reported Global Id: T0605900346 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 LUST Global Id: T0605900346 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 05/20/2009 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900346 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 07/15/2009 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900346 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 05/27/2011 Action: File review Global Id: T0605900346 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 01/20/2012 Action: File review Global Id: T0605900346 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 05/25/1989 Action: Notice of Responsibility Global Id: T0605900346 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 06/13/2006 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900346 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 01/25/2005 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900346 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 06/30/2005 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900346 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 03/14/2005 Action: Staff Letter TC3396733.2s Page 48 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS RESPONSE UNOCAL#5310 (Continued) 05/05/1997 Action: Global Id: T0605900346 T0605900346 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: Date: 09/11/1992 Risk Assessment Report Action: Site Assessment Report Action Type: Global Id: T0605900346 05/12/2005 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 04/30/2005 Action: Other Workplan Global Id: T0605900346 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 10/15/2004 Action: Other Report / Document Global Id: T0605900346 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 08/10/1993 Action: Pilot Study/ Treatability Report Global Id: T0605900346 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 10/29/1993 Action: Tank Removal Report / UST Sampling Report Global Id: T0605900346 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 05/05/1997 Action: Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action Plan Global Id: T0605900346 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 07/31/1991 Action: Site Assessment Report Global Id: T0605900346 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 06/07/2005 Action: Risk Assessment Report Global Id: T0605900346 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605900346 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Reported Global Id: T0605900346 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 05/12/2005 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900346 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5101588955 TC3396733.2s Page 49 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number UNOCAL #5310 (Continued) 5101588955 Date: 01/22/2009 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900346 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 07/07/2010 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900346 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Excavation Global Id: T0605900346 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Other (Use Description Field) Global Id: T0605900346 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 11/02/2010 Action: Staff Letter ORANGE CO. LUST: ORANGE Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 86UT008 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 09/16/1986 Case Type: Undetermined Record ID: RO0001139 Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 89UT089 Current Status: Remedial Action Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: Not reported Case Type: Other Ground Water Record ID: RO0002965 LUST REG 8: Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Remedial action (cleanup) Underway Case Number: 083000431T Local Case Num: 89UT089 Case Type: Other ground water affected Substance: Gasoline Qty Leaked: 0 Abate Method: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Enf Type: NOR Funding: Not reported How Discovered: SA TC3396733.2s Page 50 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS Orange UNOCAL#5310 (Continued) Santa Ana Region How Stopped: Other Means Case Number: Leak Cause: Unknown 86UT008 Leak Source: Unknown Substance: Global ID: T0605900346 0 How Stopped Date: 9/9/9999 Cross Street: Enter Date: Not reported Not reported Review Date: Not reported How Discovered: Prelim Assess: Not reported Discover Date: 5/12/1989 Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: Not reported Workplan: Not reported Pollution Char: Not reported Remed Plan: Not reported Remed Action: 8/19/1993 Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported GW Qualifies: ND Soil Qualifies: Not reported Operator: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: Not reported Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: 33.6150293 Longitude: -117.9304954 MTBE Date: 9/27/2004 Max MTBE GW: 0 MTBE Concentration: 0 Max MTBE Soil: Not reported MTBE Fuel: i MTBE Tested: MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detected MTBE Class: Staff: NOM Staff Initials: JK Lead Agency: Local Agency Local Agency: 30000L Hydr Basin #: Not reported Beneficial: MUN Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: Not reported Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: Not reported Local Case Num: 86UT008 Case Type: Undefined Substance: Gasoline Qty Leaked: 0 Abate Method: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Enf Type: Not reported Funding: Not reported How Discovered: Tank Closure EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5101588955 TC3396733.2s Page 51 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS 30000591 UNOCAL#5310 (Continued) UTNKA How Stopped: Close Tank Cortese Code: Leak Cause: Unknown Not reported Leak Source: Unknown Mail To: Global ID: T0605937174 911 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 10 How Stopped Date: 9/9/9999 Mailing City,St,Zip: Enter Date: Not reported Not reported Review Date: Not reported DUNS Number: Prelim Assess: Not reported Discover Date: 1/1/1965 Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: 9/16/1986 Workplan: Not reported Pollution Char: Not reported Remed Plan: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported GW Qualifies: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported Operator: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: Not reported Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: Not reported Longitude: Not reported MTBE Date: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Concentration: 0 Max MTBE Soil: Not reported MTBE Fuel: i MTBE Tested: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed. MTBE Class: Staff: NOM Staff Initials: JK Lead Agency: Local Agency Local Agency: 30000L Hydr Basin #: Not reported Beneficial: MUN Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: Not reported CA FID UST: Facility ID: 30000591 Regulated By: UTNKA Regulated ID: Not reported Cortese Code: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported Facility Phone: 7148368550 Mail To: Not reported Mailing Address: 911 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 10 Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH 92660 Contact: Not reported Contact Phone: Not reported DUNS Number: Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5101588955 TC3396733.2s Page 52 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site UNOCAL#5310 (Continued) NPDES Number: Not reported EPA ID: Not reported Comments: Not reported Status: Active SWEEPS UST: Created Date: Status: A Comp Number: 4852 Number: 9 Board Of Equalization: 44-001057 Ref Date: 09-30-92 Act Date: 09-15-92 Created Date: 02-29-88 Tank Status: A Owner Tank Id: Not reported Swrcb Tank Id: 30-000-004852-000001 Actv Date: Not reported Capacity: 12000 Tank Use: M.V. FUEL Stg: P Content: REG UNLEADED Number Of Tanks: 2 Status: A Comp Number: 4852 Number: 9 Board Of Equalization: 44-001057 Ref Date: 09-30-92 Act Date: 09-15-92 Created Date: 02-29-88 Tank Status: A Owner Tank Id: Not reported Swrcb Tank Id: 30-000-004852-000002 Actv Date: Not reported Capacity: 12000 Tank Use: M.V. FUEL Sig: P Content: DIESEL Number Of Tanks: Not reported G27 UNION OIL SERVICE STATION #531 SW 3001 NEWPORT BLVD 1/8-1/4 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 0.231 mi. 1222 ft. Site 5 of 5 in cluster G Relative: HIST UST: Higher Region: Facility ID: Actual: Facility Type: 8 ft. Other Type: Total Tanks: Contact Name: Telephone: Owner Name: Owner Address: STATE 00000019943 Gas Station Not reported 0003 SI KYUN SONG 7146733833 UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNI 123 CAMINO DELA REINA Owner City,St,Zip: SAN DIEGO, CA 92108 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5101588955 HIST UST 0001577456 N/A TC3396733.2s Page 53 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site UNION OIL SERVICE STATION #531 (Continued) Tank Num: 001 Container Num: 5310-11 Year Installed: 1964 Tank Capacity: 00010000 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: UNLEADED Tank Construction: Not reported Leak Detection: Stock Inventor, 10 Tank Num: 002 Container Num: 5310-34 Year Installed: 1964 Tank Capacity: 00000280 Tank Used for: WASTE Type of Fuel: WASTE OIL Tank Construction: Not reported Leak Detection: None Tank Num: 003 Container Num: 6310-22 Year Installed: 1964 Tank Capacity: 00010000 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: PREMIUM Tank Construction: Not reported Leak Detection: Stock Inventor, 10 H28 NEWPORT PLATING CO. SSW 2810 VILLA WAY 1/8-1/4 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0.235 mi. 1239 ft. Site 3 of 5 in cluster H Relative: Higher CORTESE: Region: CORTESE Actual: Envirostor Id: Not reported 7 ft• Site/Facility Type: Not reported Cleanup Status: Not reported Status Date: Not reported Site Code: Not reported Latitude: Not reported Longitude: Not reported Owner: Not reported Enf Type: Not reported Swat R: Not reported Flag: CORTESE Order No: Not reported Waste Discharge System No: Not reported Effective Date: Not reported Region 2: 8 WID Id: 8 302547N01 Solid Waste Id No: Not reported Waste Management Lit Name: Not reported Region: CORTESE Envirostor Id: Not reported Site/Facility Type: Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Cortese HIST CORTESE SLIC Orange Co. Industrial Site ENF ENVIROSTOR 0001577456 5101126353 N/A TC3396733.2s Page 54 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site NEWPORT PLATING CO. (Continued) Cleanup Status: Not reported Status Date: Not reported Site Code: Not reported Latitude: Not reported Longitude: Not reported Owner: Not reported Enf Type: Not reported Swat R: Not reported Flag: CORTESE Order No: Not reported Waste Discharge System No: Not reported Effective Date: Not reported Region 2: 8 WID Id: 8302547N01 Solid Waste Id No: Not reported Waste Management flit Name: Not reported CORTESE: 871C016 Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 30 Reg By: WBC&D Reg Id: 8 302547N01 SLIC: Region: Facility Status: Status Date: Global Id: Lead Agency: Lead Agency Case Number: Latitude: Longitude: Case Type: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affected: Potential Contaminants of Concern: Site History: EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5101126353 STATE Open - Remediation 01/31/2006 SL0605980961 SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Not reported 33.613553 -117.928322 Cleanup Program Site MGC Not reported Not reported Regional Board Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water), Soil " Solvents, Chromium, Copper, Lead, Mercury (elemental), Other Metal Soil and Grounwater Asssessment performed and RAP submitted Ocotber 2009 Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Orange Co. Industrial Site Case ID: 871C016 Region: ORANGE Record ID: ROOOD0097 Current Status: CLOSED 4/21/1994 Closure Type: Referred to Regional Board Released Chemical: PLATING WASTE - OTHER METALS ENF: Region: 8 Facility Id: 244269 TC3396733.2s Page 55 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number NEWPORT PLATING CO. (Continued) 5101126353 Agency Name: Newport Plating Co Place Type: Facility Place Subtype: Not reported Facility Type: Industrial Agency Type: Privately -Owned Business # Of Agencies: 1 Place Latitude: Not reported Place Longitude: Not reported SIC Code 1: 3471 SIC Desc 1: Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and Coloring SIC Code 2: Not reported SIC Desc 2: Not reported SIC Code 3: Not reported SIC Desc 3: Not reported NAICS Code 1: Not reported NAICS Desc 1: Not reported NAICS Code 2: Not reported NAICS Desc 2: Not reported NAICS Code 3: Not reported NAICS Desc 3: Not reported # Of Places: 1 Source Of Facility: Reg Meas Design Flow: Not reported Threat To Water Quality: Not reported Complexity: Not reported Pretreatment: Not reported Facility Waste Type: Not reported Facility Waste Type 2: Not reported Facility Waste Type 3: Not reported Facility Waste Type 4: Not reported Program: UNREGS # Of Programs: 1 WDID: 8 302547N01 Reg Measure Id: 158594 Reg Measure Type: Unregulated Region: 8 Order #: Not reported Npdes# CA#: Not reported Major -Minor: Not reported Npdes Type: Not reported Reclamation: Not reported Dredge Fill Fee: Not reported 301 H: Not reported Application Fee Amt Received: Not reported Status: Active Status Date: 06/17/2005 Effective Date: Not reported Expiration/Review Date: Not reported Termination Date: Not reported WDR Review - Amend: Not reported WDR Review - Revise/Renew: Not reported WDR Review - Rescind: Not reported WDR Review - No Action Required: Not reported WDR Review - Pending: Not reported WDR Review - Planned: Not reported Status Enrollee: N Individual/General: Not reported TC3396733.2s Page 56 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number NEWPORT PLATING CO. (Continued) 5101126353 Fee Code: Not reported DirectionNoice: Passive Enforcement Id(EID): 225071 Region: 8 Order/ Resolution Number: 87-083 Enforcement Action Type: Clean-up and Abatement Order Effective Date: 05/18/1987 Adoption/Issuance Date: Not reported Achieve Date: Not reported Termination Date: Not reported ACL Issuance Date: Not reported EPL Issuance Date: Not reported Status: Active Title: Enforcement - 8 302547N01 Description: CAO Program: UNREGS Latest Milestone Completion Date: Not reported # Of Programs1: 1 Total Assessment Amount: 0 Initial Assessed Amount: 0 Liability $ Amount: 0 Project $ Amount: 0 Liability $ Paid: 0 Project $ Completed: 0 Total $ Paid/Completed Amount: 0 Region: 8 Facility Id: 244269 Agency Name: Newport Plating Co Place Type: Facility Place Subtype: Not reported Facility Type: Industrial Agency Type: Privately -Owned Business # Of Agencies: 1 Place Latitude: Not reported Place Longitude: Not reported SIC Code 1: 3471 SIC Desc 1: Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and Coloring SIC Code 2: Not reported SIC Desc 2: Not reported SIC Code 3: Not reported SIC Desc 3: Not reported NAICS Code 1: Not reported NAICS Desc 1: Not reported NAICS Code 2: Not reported NAICS Desc 2: Not reported NAICS Code 3: Not reported NAICS Desc 3: Not reported # Of Places: 1 Source Of Facility: Reg Meas Design Flow: Not reported Threat To Water Quality: Not reported Complexity: Not reported Pretreatment: Not reported Facility Waste Type: Not reported Facility Waste Type 2: Not reported Facility Waste Type 3: Not reported TC3396733.2s Page 57 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number NEWPORT PLATING CO. (Continued) 5101126353 Facility Waste Type 4: Not reported Program: UNREGS # Of Programs: 1 WDID: 8 302547N01 Reg Measure Id: 158594 Reg Measure Type: Unregulated Region: 8 Order #: Not reported Npdes# CA#: Not reported Major -Minor: Not reported Npdes Type: Not reported Reclamation: Not reported Dredge Fill Fee: Not reported 301 H: Not reported Application Fee Amt Received: Not reported Status: Active Status Date: 06/17/2005 Effective Date: Not reported Expiration/Review Date: Not reported Termination Date: Not reported WDR Review - Amend: Not reported WDR Review - Revise/Renew: Not reported WDR Review - Rescind: Not reported WDR Review - No Action Required: Not reported WDR Review - Pending: Not reported WDR Review - Planned: Not reported Status Enrollee: N Individual/General: Not reported Fee Code: Not reported DirectionNoice: Passive Enforcement Id(EID): 225070 Region: 8 Order/ Resolution Number: 87-111 Enforcement Action Type: Clean-up and Abatement Order Effective Date: 07/31/1987 Adoption/Issuance Date: Not reported Achieve Date: Not reported Termination Date: Not reported ACL Issuance Date: Not reported EPL Issuance Date: Not reported Status: Active Title: Enforcement - 8 302547N01 Description: AMENDED ORDER NO 87-83 Program: UNREGS Latest Milestone Completion Date: Not reported # Of Programs1: 1 Total Assessment Amount: 0 Initial Assessed Amount: 0 Liability $ Amount: 0 Project $ Amount: 0 Liability $ Paid: 0 Project $ Completed: 0 Total $ Paid/Completed Amount: 0 Region: 8 Facility Id: 244269 Agency Name: Newport Plating Co TC3396733.2s Page 58 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number NEWPORT PLATING CO. (Continued) 5101126353 Place Type: Facility Place Subtype: Not reported Facility Type: Industrial Agency Type: Privately -Owned Business # Of Agencies: 1 Place Latitude: Not reported Place Longitude: Not reported SIC Code 1: 3471 SIC Desc 1: Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and Coloring SIC Code 2: Not reported SIC Desc 2: Not reported SIC Code 3: Not reported SIC Desc 3: Not reported NAICS Code 1: Not reported NAICS Desc 1: Not reported NAICS Code 2: Not reported NAICS Desc 2: Not reported NAICS Code 3: Not reported NAICS Desc 3: Not reported # Of Places: 1 Source Of Facility: Reg Meas Design Flow: Not reported Threat To Water Quality: Not reported Complexity: Not reported Pretreatment: Not reported Facility Waste Type: Not reported Facility Waste Type 2: Not reported Facility Waste Type 3: Not reported Facility Waste Type 4: Not reported Program: UNREGS # Of Programs: 1 WDID: 8 302547N01 Reg Measure Id: 158594 Reg Measure Type: Unregulated Region: 8 Order #: Not reported Npdes# CA#: Not reported Major -Minor: Not reported Npdes Type: Not reported Reclamation: Not reported Dredge Fill Fee: Not reported 301 H: Not reported Application Fee Amt Received: Not reported Status: Active Status Date: 06/17/2005 Effective Date: Not reported Expiration/Review Date: Not reported Termination Date: Not reported WDR Review - Amend: Not reported WDR Review - Revise/Renew: Not reported WDR Review - Rescind: Not reported WDR Review - No Action Required: Not reported WDR Review - Pending: Not reported WDR Review - Planned: Not reported Status Enrollee: N Individual/General: Not reported Fee Code: Not reported TC3396733.2s Page 59 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number NEWPORT PLATING CO. (Continued) 5101126353 DirectionNoice: Passive Enforcement Id(EID): 225069 Region: 8 Order / Resolution Number: 87-153 Enforcement Action Type: Admin Civil Liability Effective Date: 12/11/1987 Adoption/Issuance Date: Not reported Achieve Date: Not reported Termination Date: Not reported ACL Issuance Date: Not reported EPL Issuance Date: Not reported Status: Active Title: Enforcement - 8 302547N01 Description: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CAO Program: UNREGS Latest Milestone Completion Date: Not reported # Of Programs': 1 Total Assessment Amount: 5000 Initial Assessed Amount: 0 Liability $ Amount: 5000 Project $ Amount: 0 Liability $ Paid: 0 Project $ Completed: 0 Total $ Paid/Completed Amount: 0 Region: 8 Facility Id: 244269 Agency Name: Newport Plating Co Place Type: Facility Place Subtype: Not reported Facility Type: Industrial Agency Type: Privately -Owned Business # Of Agencies: 1 Place Latitude: Not reported Place Longitude: Not reported SIC Code 1: 3471 SIC Desc 1: Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and Coloring SIC Code 2: Not reported SIC Desc 2: Not reported SIC Code 3: Not reported SIC Desc 3: Not reported NAICS Code 1: Not reported NAICS Desc 1: Not reported NAICS Code 2: Not reported NAICS Desc 2: Not reported NAICS Code 3: Not reported NAICS Desc 3: Not reported # Of Places: 1 Source Of Facility: Reg Meas Design Flow: Not reported Threat To Water Quality: Not reported Complexity: Not reported Pretreatment: Not reported Facility Waste Type: Not reported Facility Waste Type 2: Not reported Facility Waste Type 3: Not reported Facility Waste Type 4: Not reported TC3396733.2s Page 60 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number NEWPORT PLATING CO. (Continued) 5101126353 Program: UNREGS # Of Programs: 1 WDID: 8 302547N01 Reg Measure Id: 158594 Reg Measure Type: Unregulated Region: 8 Order #: Not reported Npdes# CA#: Not reported Major -Minor: Not reported Npdes Type: Not reported Reclamation: Not reported Dredge Fill Fee: Not reported 301 H: Not reported Application Fee Amt Received: Not reported Status: Active Status Date: 06/17/2005 Effective Date: Not reported Expiration/Review Date: Not reported Termination Date: Not reported WOR Review - Amend: Not reported WDR Review - Revise/Renew: Not reported WDR Review - Rescind: Not reported WDR Review - No Action Required: Not reported WDR Review - Pending: Not reported WDR Review - Planned: Not reported Status Enrollee: N Individual/General: Not reported Fee Code: Not reported DirectionNoice: Passive Enforcement Id(EID): 225068 Region: 8 Order/ Resolution Number: LT880519 Enforcement Action Type: Formal Refer to Attorney Gen Effective Date: 05/19/1988 Adoption/Issuance Date: Not reported Achieve Date: Not reported Termination Date: Not reported ACL Issuance Date: Not reported EPL Issuance Date: Not reported Status: Active Title: Enforcement - 8 302547N01 Description: COLLECTION OF ACL Program: UNREGS Latest Milestone Completion Date: Not reported # Of Programsl: 1 Total Assessment Amount: 0 Initial Assessed Amount: 0 Liability $ Amount: 0 Project $ Amount: 0 Liability $ Paid: 0 Project $ Completed: 0 Total $ Paid/Completed Amount: 0 Region: 8 Facility Id: 244269 Agency Name: Newport Plating Co Place Type: Facility TC3396733.2s Page 61 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number NEWPORT PLATING CO. (Continued) 5101126353 Place Subtype: Not reported Facility Type: Industrial Agency Type: Privately -Owned Business # Of Agencies: 1 Place Latitude: Not reported Place Longitude: Not reported SIC Code 1: 3471 SIC Desc 1: Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and Coloring SIC Code 2: Not reported SIC Desc 2: Not reported SIC Code 3: Not reported SIC Desc 3: Not reported NAICS Code 1: Not reported NAICS Desc 1: Not reported NAICS Code 2: Not reported NAICS Desc 2: Not reported NAICS Code 3: Not reported NAICS Desc 3: Not reported # Of Places: 1 Source Of Facility: Reg Meas Design Flow: Not reported Threat To Water Quality: Not reported Complexity: Not reported Pretreatment: Not reported Facility Waste Type: Not reported Facility Waste Type 2: Not reported Facility Waste Type 3: Not reported Facility Waste Type 4: Not reported Program: UNREGS # Of Programs: 1 WDID: 8 302547N01 Reg Measure Id: 158594 Reg Measure Type: Unregulated Region: 8 Order #: Not reported Npdes# CA#: Not reported Major -Minor: Not reported Npdes Type: Not reported Reclamation: Not reported Dredge Fill Fee: Not reported 301 H: Not reported Application Fee Amt Received: Not reported Status: Active Status Date: 06/17/2005 Effective Date: Not reported Expiration/Review Date: Not reported Termination Date: Not reported WDR Review - Amend: Not reported WDR Review - Revise/Renew: Not reported WDR Review- Rescind: Not reported WDR Review - No Action Required: Not reported WDR Review - Pending: Not reported WDR Review - Planned: Not reported Status Enrollee: N Individual/General: Not reported Fee Code: Not reported DirectionNoice: Passive TC3396733.2s Page 62 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number NEWPORT PLATING CO. (Continued) 5101126353 Enforcement Id(EID): 225064 Region: 8 Order/ Resolution Number: 88-087 Enforcement Action Type: Admin Civil Liability Effective Date: 06/21/1988 Adoption/Issuance Date: Not reported Achieve Date: Not reported Termination Date: Not reported ACL Issuance Date: Not reported EPL Issuance Date: Not reported Status: Active Title: Enforcement - 8 302547N01 Description: $18800 WILL BE SUSPENDED PROVIDED HE PAYS PREVIOUS ASSESSMENT ALONG SIC Code 3: WITH THIS ONE ($16,000) Program: UNREGS Latest Milestone Completion Date: Not reported # Of Programs': 1 Total Assessment Amount: 16000 Initial Assessed Amount: 0 Liability $ Amount: 16000 Project $ Amount: 0 Liability $ Paid: 0 Project $ Completed: 0 Total $ Paid/Completed Amount: 0 Region: 8 Facility Id: 244269 Agency Name: Newport Plating Co Place Type: Facility Place Subtype: Not reported Facility Type: Industrial Agency Type: Privately -Owned Business # Of Agencies: 1 Place Latitude: Not reported Place Longitude: Not reported SIC Code 1: 3471 SIC Desc 1: Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and Coloring SIC Code 2: Not reported SIC Desc 2: Not reported SIC Code 3: Not reported SIC Desc 3: Not reported NAICS Code 1: Not reported NAICS Desc 1: Not reported NAICS Code 2: Not reported NAICS Desc 2: Not reported NAICS Code 3: Not reported NAICS Desc 3: Not reported # Of Places: 1 Source Of Facility: Reg Meas Design Flow: Not reported Threat To Water Quality: Not reported Complexity: Not reported Pretreatment: Not reported Facility Waste Type: Not reported Facility Waste Type 2: Not reported Facility Waste Type 3: Not reported Facility Waste Type 4: Not reported TC3396733.2s Page 63 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number NEWPORT PLATING CO. (Continued) 5101126353 Program: UNREGS # Of Programs: 1 WDID: 8 302547N01 Reg Measure Id: 158594 Reg Measure Type: Unregulated Region: 8 Order #: Not reported Npdes# CA#: Not reported Major -Minor: Not reported Npdes Type: Not reported Reclamation: Not reported Dredge Fill Fee: Not reported 301 H: Not reported Application Fee Amt Received: Not reported Status: Active Status Date: 06/17/2005 Effective Date: Not reported Expiration/Review Date: Not reported Termination Date: Not reported WOR Review - Amend: Not reported WDR Review - Revise/Renew: Not reported WDR Review - Rescind: Not reported WDR Review - No Action Required: Not reported WDR Review - Pending: Not reported WDR Review - Planned: Not reported Status Enrollee: N Individual/General: Not reported Fee Code: Not reported DirectionNoice: Passive Enforcement Id(EID): 224828 Region: 8 Order/ Resolution Number: LT900711 Enforcement Action Type: Formal Refer to Attorney Gen Effective Date: 07/11/1990 Adoption/Issuance Date: Not reported Achieve Date: Not reported Termination Date: Not reported ACL Issuance Date: Not reported EPL Issuance Date: Not reported Status: Active Title: Enforcement - 8 302547N01 Description: FOR COLLECTION OF ACL Program: UNREGS Latest Milestone Completion Date: Not reported # Of Programsl: 1 Total Assessment Amount: 0 Initial Assessed Amount: 0 Liability $ Amount: 0 Project $ Amount: 0 Liability $ Paid: 0 Project $ Completed: 0 Total $ Paid/Completed Amount: 0 ENVIROSTOR: Site Type: Historical Site Type Detailed: ` Historical Acres: Not reported TC3396733.2s Page 64 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site NEWPORT PLATING CO. (Continued) MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number NPL: NO Regulatory Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED Program Manager: Not reported Supervisor: Referred - Not Assigned Division Branch: Cleanup Cypress Facility ID: 30340050 Site Code: Not reported Assembly: 74 Senate: 37 Special Program: ' CERC2 Status: Refer: Other Agency Status Date: 09/30/1987 Restricted Use: NO Site Mgmt. Req.: NONE SPECIFIED Funding: Not reported Latitude: 33.61350 Longitude: -117.9283 APN: NONE SPECIFIED Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED Potential COC: 10034, 10095, 10097, 10119, 20002, 30108, 30153, 30160, 30407 Confirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Description: NONE SPECIFIED Alias Name: 110002801120 Alias Type: EPA (FRS #) Alias Name: 30340050 Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number 5101126353 Completed Info: Not reported Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Preliminary Assessment Report Completed Date: 10/16/1987 Comments: PRELIM ASSESS DONE DHS -PENDING STATUS; RWQCB AND CO HLTH INVOLVED IN Schedule Document Type: AN ENFORCEMENT ACTION. Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Site Screening Completed Date: 02/13/1987 Comments: SITE SCREENING DONE RATIONALE FOR PA: MORE INFO. NEEDED. Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported TC3396733.2s Page 65 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site H29 NEWPORT PLATING SSW 2810 VILLA WAY 118-1/4 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0.235 mi. Priority Level: 1239 ft. Site 4 of 5 in cluster H Relative: CERC-NFRAP: Higher Site ID: 04/27/1989 Federal Facility: Actual: NPL Status: 7 ft. Non NPL Status: MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number CERC-NFRAP RCRA-SQG FINDS 0902597 Not a Federal Facility Not on the NPL NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing information CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Contact Details: Contact Sequence I D: 13054882.00000 Person ID: 9271184.00000 Contact Sequence ID: 13290075.00000 Person ID: 13003854.00000 Contact Sequence ID: 13295670.00000 Person ID: 13003858.00000 Contact Sequence I D: 13301528.00000 Person ID: 13004003.00000 CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History: Action: DISCOVERY Date Started: Not reported Date Completed: 11/01/1987 Priority Level: Not reported Action: ARCH IVE SITE Date Started: Not reported Date Completed: 04/27/1989 Priority Level: Not reported Action: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT Date Started: Not reported Date Completed: 04/27/1989 Priority Level: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing information RCRA-SQG: Not reported Date form received by agency: 09/01/1996 Facility name: NEWPORT PLATING Facility address: 2810 VILLA WAY Not reported NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 EPA ID: CAD982360356 Mailing address: 2807 VILLA WAY 09 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 Contact: Not reported Contact address: Not reported Not reported Contact country: Not reported Contact telephone: Not reported Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 09 Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous 1000348895 CAD982360356 TC3396733.2s Page 66 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site NEWPORT PLATING (Continued) Owner/Operator Summary EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time Owner/operator name: NOT REQUIRED Owner/operator address: NOT REQUIRED Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: (415) 555-1212 Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Operator Owner/Op start date: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/operator name: G MCCULLOCH Owner/operator address: NOT REQUIRED Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: (415) 555-1212 Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner Owner/Op start date: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Historical Generators: Date form received by agency: 08/2111990 Facility name: NEWPORT PLATING Classification: Large Quantity Generator Violation Status: FINDS: Registry ID: No violations found 110002801120 Environmental Interest/Information System RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource 1000348895 TC3396733.2s Page 67 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number NEWPORT PLATING (Continued) 1000348895 Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. H30 NEWPORT PLATING Contact: SLIC 5108543037 SSW 2810 VILLA WAY Higher NIA 118-114 NEWPORT BEACH, CA Facility name: PHILIPS ONE HR PHOTO 0.235 mi. Facility address: 2825 NEWPORT BLVD 8 ft. 1239 ft. Site 5 of 5 in cluster H Description: EPA ID: Relative: SLIC REG 8: Mailing address: NEWPORT BLVD Higher Type: Soil and Groundwater hazardous waste at any time Facility Status: Additional Characterization Underway Actual: Region: 8 7 ft. Staff: MGC Substance: MGC Lead Agency: MGC Location Code: MGC Thomas Bros Code: MGC 131 PHILIPS ONE HR PHOTO RCRA-SQG 1000818594 SSW 2825 NEWPORT BLVD FINDS CAD983644766 118-114 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0.244 mi. 1288 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster I Contact: Relative: RCRA-SQG: 2825 NEWPORT BLVD Higher Date form received by agency: 08/04/1992 us Facility name: PHILIPS ONE HR PHOTO Actual: Facility address: 2825 NEWPORT BLVD 8 ft. Classification: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 Description: EPA ID: CAD983644766 waste during any calendar month andaccumulates less than 6000 kg of Mailing address: NEWPORT BLVD Owner/Operator Summary Owner/operator name: PHILIP YANG KIM Owner/operator address: 110 E 9TH ST CALIF MART B 265 LOS ANGELES, CA 90079 Owner/operator country: Not reported TC3396733.2s Page 68 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 Contact: PHILIP YANG KIM Contact address: 2825 NEWPORT BLVD NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 Contact country: us Contact telephone: (213) 627-9803 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 09 Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous waste during any calendar month andaccumulates less than 6000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time Owner/Operator Summary Owner/operator name: PHILIP YANG KIM Owner/operator address: 110 E 9TH ST CALIF MART B 265 LOS ANGELES, CA 90079 Owner/operator country: Not reported TC3396733.2s Page 68 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site PHILIPS ONE HR PHOTO (Continued) Owner/operator telephone: (213) 627-9805 Legal status: Private Own er/Operator Type: Owner Owner/Op start date: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Handler Activities Summary: SEA CREST CLEANERS U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Violation Status: FINDS: Registry ID: No violations found 110002882220 Environmental Interest/Information System EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. 132 SEA CREST CLEANERS SSW 2825 NEWPORT BLVD UNIT A 118-114 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0.244 mi. 1288 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster I Relative: RCRA-SQG: Higher Date form received by agency: 1011111995 Facility name: SFA CREST CLEANERS Actual: Facility address: 2825 NEWPORT BLVD UNIT 8 ft. NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92661 EPA ID: CAD983660192 Contact: TINA HOFFMAN Contact address: 2825 NEWPORT BLVD UNIT NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92661 Contact country: US Contact telephone: (714) 675-0815 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 09 Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator 1000818594 RCRA-SQG 1000819999 FINDS CAD983660192 TC3396733.2s Page 69 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site SEA CREST CLEANERS (Continued) MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time Owner/Operator Summary: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: TINA HOFFMAN 2825 NEWPORT BLVD UNIT A NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92661 Not reported (714) 675-0815 Private Owner Not reported Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Violation Status: FINDS: Registry ID: No violations found 110009550752 Environmental Interest/information System RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. 1000819999 TC3396733.2s Page 70 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site 133 SEACREST CLEANERS SSW 2825 NEWPORT BLVD 118-114 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0.244 mi. NAICS Description: 1288 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster I Relative: DRYCLEANERS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number DRYCLEANERS 5109149150 HAZNET N/A Higher EPA Id: CAL000330849 NAICS Code: 81232 Actual: NAICS Description: Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin -Operated) 8 ft. SIC Code: 7211 SIC Description: Power Laundries, Family and Commercial Create Date: 03/20/2008 Facility Active: No Inactive Date: 06/30/2008 Facility Addr2: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 2825 NEWPORT BLVD Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing State: CA Mailing Zip: 926633723 Owner Name: YOUNG CHO Owner Address: 2825 NEWPORT BLVD Owner Address 2: Not reported Owner Telephone: 9496750815 Contact Name: YOUNG CHO Contact Address: 2825 NEWPORT BLVD Contact Address 2: Not reported Contact Telephone: 9496750815 HAZNET: Year: 2008 Gepaid: CAL000330849 Contact: YOUNG CHO Telephone: 9496750815 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 2625 NEWPORT BLVD Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926633723 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: NVR000076158 TSD County: 99 Waste Category: Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene, etc) Disposal Method: Solvents Recovery Tons: 0.2502 Facility County: Orange 34 UNDESIGNATED PARKING AREA HIST CORTESE 5101307823 SSW 2809 NEWPORT LUST N/A 1/4-1/2 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 0.266 mi. 1402 ft. Relative: CORTESE: Higher Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 30 Actual: Reg By: LTNKA 8 ft. Reg Id: 083001570T TC3396733.2s Page 71 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site UNDESIGNATED PARKING AREA (Continued) LUST: Region: Global Id: Latitude: Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: Potential Contaminants of Concern: Site History: STATE T0605901199 33.6137141 -117.9301549 LUST Cleanup Site Completed - Case Closed 11/07/1990 ORANGE COUNTY LOP JK ORANGE COUNTY LOP 083001570T 90UT156 Local Agency Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / Lubricating, Kerosene Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility LUST: T0605901199 Global Id: T0605901199 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 Global Id: T0605901199 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: PATRICIA HANNON Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: phannon@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: Not reported LUST: Global Id: T0605901199 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605901199 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Reported ORANGE CO. LUST: Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 90UT156 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Motor oil EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5101307823 TC3396733.2s Page 72 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number UNDESIGNATED PARKING AREA (Continued) 5101307823 Date Closed: 11/07/1990 Case Type: Other Ground Water Record ID: RO0000767 Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 90UT156 Current Status: Not reported Released Substance: Kerosene Date Closed: 11/07/1990 Case Type: Not reported Record ID: RO0000767 LUST REG 8: Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: 083001570T Local Case Num: 90UT156 Case Type: Other ground water affected Substance: 8008206,8 Qty Leaked: 0 Abate Method: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Ent Type: Not reported Funding: Not reported How Discovered: Tank Closure How Stopped: Close Tank Leak Cause: Unknown Leak Source: Unknown Global ID: T0605901199 How Stopped Date: 9/9/9999 Enter Date: Not reported Review Date: Not reported Prelim Assess: Not reported Discover Date: 5/4/1990 Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: 11/7/1990 Workplan: Not reported Pollution Char: Not reported Remed Plan: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported GW Qualifies: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported Operator: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: Not reported Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: 33.6138783 Longitude: -117.9297424 MTBE Date: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Concentration: 0 Max MTBE Soil: Not reported MTBE Fuel: 0 TC3396733.2s Page 73 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site 35 North 1/4-1/2 0.290 mi 1529 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 11 ft. UNDESIGNATED PARKING AREA (Continued) MTBE Tested: MTBE Class: Staff: Staff Initials: Lead Agency: Local Agency: Hydr Basin #: Beneficial: Priority: Cleanup Fund Id: Work Suspended: Summary: Not Required to be Tested. PAH JK Local Agency 30000L Not reported MUN Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported HARBOR CLUB MARINA 3333 COAST NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92659 CORTESE: Region: Facility County Code: Reg By: Reg Id: LUST: Region: Global Id: Latitude: Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: CORTESE 30 LTNKA 083001846T STATE T0605901381 33.5956272 -117.8704576 LUST Cleanup Site Completed - Case Closed 03/10/1997 ORANGE COUNTY LOP JK ORANGE COUNTY LOP 083001846T 91UT099 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5101307823 HIST CORTESE 5103943579 LUST NIA File Location: Local Agency Potential Media Affect: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Potential Contaminants of Concern: Gasoline Site History: Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: LUST: Global Id: Contact Type: Contact Name: Organization Name: Address: City: Email: Phone Number: Global Id: Contact Type: Contact Name: T0605901381 Local Agency Caseworker DENAMARIE BAKER ORANGE COUNTY LOP 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 SANTA ANA dbaker@ochca.com 7144336255 T0605901381 Regional Board Caseworker CARLBERNHARDT TC3396733.2s Page 74 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HARBOR CLUB MARINA (Continued) Organization Name: Address: City: Email: Phone Number: LUST: Global Id: Action Type: Date: Action: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 RIVERSIDE cbemhardt@waterboards.ca.gov 9517824495 T0605901381 REMEDIATION 01/01/1950 Excavation Global Id: T0605901381 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Other (Use Description Field) Global Id: T0605901381 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605901381 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Reported ORANGE CO. LUST: Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 91 UT099 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 03/10/1997 Case Type: Other Ground Water Record ID: RO0000910 LUST REG 8: Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: 083001846T Local Case Num: 91 UT099 Case Type: Other ground water affected Substance: Gasoline Qty Leaked: 0 Abate Method: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Enf Type: Not reported Funding: Not reported How Discovered: Tank Closure How Stopped: Close Tank Leak Cause: Unknown Leak Source: Unknown Global ID: T0605901381 5103943579 TC3396733.2s Page 75 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS JK HARBOR CLUB MARINA (Continued) Local Agency How Stopped Date: 9/9/9999 Hydr Basin #: Enter Date: Not reported MUN Review Date: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Prelim Assess: Not reported Not reported Discover Date: 8/12/1991 CORTESE Enforcement Date: Not reported 30 Close Date: 3/10/1997 LTNKA Workplan: Not reported 083000486T Pollution Char: Not reported CORTESE Remed Plan: Not reported 30 Remed Action: Not reported LTNKA Monitoring: Not reported 0830006347 Enter Date: Not reported CORTESE GW Qualifies: Not reported 30 Soil Qualifies: Not reported Operator: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: Not reported Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: 33.6211301 Longitude: -117.9280773 MTBE Date: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Concentration: 0 Max MTBE Soil: Not reported MTBE Fuel: 1 MTBE Tested: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed. MTBE Class: Staff: CAB Staff Initials: JK Lead Agency: Local Agency Local Agency: 30000L Hydr Basin #: Not reported Beneficial: MUN Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: Not reported J36 CHEVRON #9-9706 NNE 2801 114-112 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0.305 mi. 1609 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster J Relative: CORTESE: Higher Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 30 Actual: Reg By: LTNKA 11 ft. Reg Id: 083000486T Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 30 Reg By: LTNKA Reg Id: 0830006347 Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 30 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S103943579 HIST CORTESE 5104791741 N/A TC3396733.2s Page 76 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site CHEVRON #9-9706 (Continued) Reg By: LTNKA Reg Id: 083000359T Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 30 Reg By: LTNKA Regld: 083000366T J37 SHELL OIL NNE 2801 COAST 1/4.1/2 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92625 0.305 mi. Global Id: 1609 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster J Relative: LUST: Higher Region: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Global Id: Actual: Latitude: 11 ft. Longitude: dbaker@ochca.com Case Type: 7144336255 Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: STATE T0605900291 33.60056 -117.872854 LUST Cleanup Site Completed - Case Closed 08/06/1991 ORANGE COUNTY LOP JK ORANGE COUNTY LOP 083000366T 84UT025 Local Agency Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Potential Contaminants of Concern: Gasoline Site History: Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: LUST: Organization Name: Global Id: T0605900291 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 Global Id: T0605900291 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: CARL BERNHARDT Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: cbemhardt@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: 9517824495 LUST: Global Id: T0605900291 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Excavation EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5104791741 LUST 5105695949 N/A TC3396733.2s Page 77 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site SHELL OIL (Continued) Global Id: T0605900291 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Other (Use Description Field) Global Id: T0605900291 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605900291 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Reported ORANGE CO. LUST: Region: Facility Id: Current Status: Released Substance: Date Closed: Case Type: Record ID: LUST REG 8: Region: County: Regional Board: Facility Status: Case Number: Local Case Num: Case Type: Substance: Qty Leaked: Abate Method: Cross Street: Enf Type: Funding: How Discovered: How Stopped: Leak Cause: Leak Source: Global ID: How Stopped Date: Enter Date: Review Date: Prelim Assess: Discover Date: Enforcement Date: Close Date: Workplan: Pollution Char: Remed Plan: Remed Action: Monitoring: EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number ORANGE 84UT025 Certification (Case Closed) Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded 08/06/1991 Other Ground Water RO0001253 8 Orange Santa Ana Region Case Closed 083000366T 84UT025 Other ground water affected Gasoline 0 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Tank Closure Close Tank Unknown Unknown T0605900291 9/9/9999 Not reported Not reported Not reported 12/5/1984 Not reported 8/6/1991 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 5105695949 TC3396733.2s Page 78 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site SHELL OIL (Continued) Enter Date: GW Qualifies: Soil Qualifies: Operator: Facility Contact: Interim: Oversite Program: Latitude: Longitude: MTBE Date: Max MTBE GW: MTBE Concentration: Max MTBE Soil: MTBE Fuel: MTBE Tested: MTBE Class: Staff: Staff Initials: Lead Agency: Local Agency: Hydr Basin #: Beneficial: MAP FINDINGS Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported LUST 33.6007693 -117.872009 Not reported Not reported 0 Not reported 1 Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed. CAB JK Local Agency 30000L Not reported MUN Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: Not reported J38 SHELL OIL NE 2800 COAST 1/4-1/2 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 0.309 mi. 1632 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster J Relative: LUST: Higher Region: Global Id: Actual: Latitude: 11 ft. Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: Potential Contaminants of Concern: Site History: STATE T0605900285 33.601063 -117.872332 LUST Cleanup Site Completed - Case Closed 04/09/1985 ORANGE COUNTY LOP JK ORANGE COUNTY LOP 083000359T 85UT039 Local Agency Under Investigation Gasoline Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: LUST: Global Id: Contact Type: Contact Name: Organization Name: T0605900285 Local Agency Caseworker DENAMARIE BAKER ORANGE COUNTY LOP EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5105695949 LUST 5105696166 N/A TC3396733.2s Page 79 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number SHELL OIL (Continued) 5105696166 Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochr .com Phone Number: 7144336255 Global Id: T0605900285 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: CARL BERNHARDT Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: cbemhardt@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: 9517824495 ORANGE CO. LUST: Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 85UT039 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 04/09/1985 Case Type: Undetermined Record ID: RO0001696 LUST REG 8: Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: 083000359T Local Case Num: 85UT039 Case Type: Undefined Substance: Gasoline Qty Leaked: 0 Abate Method: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Enf Type: Not reported Funding: Not reported How Discovered: Tank Closure How Stopped: Close Tank. Leak Cause: Unknown Leak Source: Unknown Global ID: T0605900285 How Stopped Date: 9/9/9999 Enter Date: Not reported Review Date: Not reported Prelim Assess: Not reported Discover Date: 1/1/1965 Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: 4/9/1985 Workplan: Not reported Pollution Char: Not reported Remed Plan: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported TC3396733.2s Page 80 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site SHELL OIL (Continued) GW Qualifies: Soil Qualifies: Operator: Facility Contact: Interim: Oversite Program: Latitude: Longitude: MTBE Date: Max MTBE GW: MTBE Concentration: Max MTBE Soil: MTBE Fuel: MTBE Tested: MTBE Class: Staff: Staff Initials: Lead Agency: Local Agency: Hydr Basin #: Beneficial: MAP FINDINGS Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported LUST 33.6201242 -117.9242572 Not reported Not reported 0 Not reported 1 Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed. CAB JK Local Agency 30000L Not reported MAR Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: Not reported 39 PORT CALYPSO NE 2633 COAST 114-112 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0.316 mi. 1671 ft. Relative: CORTESE: Higher Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 30 Actual: Reg By: LTNKA 12 ft. Reg Id: 083002745T LUST: Region: Global Id: Latitude: Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: Potential Contaminants of Concern: Site History: EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5105696166 HIST CORTESE 5102435380 LUST NIA STATE T0605901894 33.6021041 -117.8730941 LUST Cleanup Site Completed - Case Closed 0611111996 ORANGE COUNTY LOP JK ORANGE COUNTY LOP 083002745T 95UT037 Local Agency Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Diesel, Gasoline Not reported TC3396733.2s Page 81 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number PORT CALYPSO (Continued) 5102435380 Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility LUST: T0605901894 Global Id: T0605901894 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 Global Id: T0605901894 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: CARL BERNHARDT Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: cbemhardt@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: 9517824495 LUST: ORANGE Global Id: T0605901894 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605901894 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Reported ORANGE CO. LUST: ORANGE Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 95UT037 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Diesel fuel oil and additives, Nos.1-D, 2-D,2-4 Date Closed: 06/11/1996 Case Type: Other Ground Water Record ID: RO0001888 Region: ORANGE Facility to: 95UT037 Current Status: Not reported Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 06/11/1996 Case Type: Not reported Record ID: RO0001888 LUST REG 8: Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Case Closed TC3396733.2s Page 82 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site PORT CALYPSO (Continued) Case Number: Local Case Num: Case Type: Substance: Qty Leaked: Abate Method: Cross Street: Enf Type: Funding: How Discovered: How Stopped: Leak Cause: Leak Source: Global ID: How Stopped Date: Enter Date: Review Date: Prelim Assess: Discover Date: Enforcement Date: Close Date: Workplan: Pollution Char: Remed Plan: Remed Action: Monitoring: Enter Date: GW Qualifies: Soil Qualifies: Operator: Facility Contact: Interim: Oversite Program: Latitude: Longitude: MTBE Date: Max MTBE GW: MTBE Concentration: Max MTBE Soil: MTBE Fuel: MTBE Tested: MTBE Class: Staff: Staff Initials: Lead Agency: Local Agency: Hydr Basin #: Beneficial: Priority: Cleanup Fund Id: Work Suspended: Summary: 083002745T 95UT037 Other ground water affected 12034,800661 0 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Tank Closure Close Tank Unknown Unknown T0605901894 9/9/9999 Not reported Not reported Not reported 5/31/1995 Not reported 6/11/1996 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported LUST 33.6195442 -117.9230942 Not reported Not reported 0 Not reported Not Required to be Tested. CAB JK Local Agency 30000L Not reported MAR Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5102435380 TC3396733.2s Page 83 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 40 NEWPORT IMPORTS HIST CORTESE North 3100 W COAST HWY LUST 1/4-112 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 CA FID UST 0.317 mi. Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 1672 ft. SANTA ANA Email: Relative: CORTESE: 7144336255 Higher Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 30 Actual: Reg By: LTNKA 12 ft. Reg Id: 083000941T LUST: Region: STATE Global Id: T0605900748 Latitude: 33.598086 Longitude: -117.871393 Case Type: LUST Cleanup Site Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 12/20/1985 Lead Agency: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Case Worker: JK Local Agency: ORANGE COUNTY LOP RB Case Number: 083000941T LOC Case Number: 85UT112 File Location: Local Agency Potential Media Affect: Under Investigation Potential Contaminants of Concern: Gasoline Site History: Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility LUST: T0605900748 Global Id: T0605900748 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 Global Id: T0605900748 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: PATRICIA HANNON Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: phannon@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: Not reported Region: STATE Global Id: T0605900232 Latitude: 33.598086 Longitude: -117.871393 Case Type: LUST Cleanup Site Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 06/29/1998 5101631434 N/A TC3396733.2s Page 84 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number NEWPORT IMPORTS (Continued) 5101631434 Lead Agency: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Case Worker: JK Local Agency: ORANGE COUNTY LOP RB Case Number: 083000296T LOC Case Number: 87UT009 File Location: Local Agency Potential Media Affect: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Potential Contaminants of Concern: Gasoline Site History: Not reported Click here to access the Califomia GeoTracker records for this facility LUST: T0605900232 Global Id: T0605900232 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 Global Id: T0605900232 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: CARL BERNHARDT Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: cbemhardt@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: 9517824495 LUST: Global Id: T0605900232 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605900232 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Reported ORANGE CO. LUST: Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 85UT112 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 12/20/1985 Case Type: Undetermined Record ID: RO0000903 Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 87UT009 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 06/29/1998 TC3396733.2s Page 85 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number NEWPORT IMPORTS (Continued) 5101631434 Case Type: Other Ground Water Record ID: RO0000986 LUST REG 8: Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: 083000296T Local Case Num: 87UT009 Case Type: Other ground water affected Substance: Gasoline Qty Leaked: 0 Abate Method: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Ent Type: Not reported Funding: Not reported How Discovered: Tank Closure How Stopped: Close Tank Leak Cause: Unknown Leak Source: Unknown Global ID: T0605900232 How Stopped Date: 9/9/9999 Enter Date: Not reported Review Date: Not reported Prelim Assess: Not reported Discover Date: 1/15/1987 Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: 6/29/1998 Workplan: Not reported Pollution Char: Not reported Remed Plan: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported GW Qualifies: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported Operator: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: Not reported Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: 33.6210991 Longitude: -117.9262783 MTBE Date: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Concentration: 0 Max MTBE Soil: Not reported MTBE Fuel: 1 MTBE Tested: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed. MTBE Class: Staff: CAB Staff Initials: JK Lead Agency: Local Agency Local Agency: 30000L Hydr Basin #: Not reported Beneficial: MUN Priority: Not reported TC3396733.2s Page 86 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site NEWPORT IMPORTS (Continued) Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: Not reported CA FID UST: SHELL OIL (FORMER) Facility ID: 30008696 Regulated By: UTNKA Regulated ID: Not reported Cortese Code: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported Facility Phone: 7147224100 Mail To: Not reported Mailing Address: 3100 W COAST HWY Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH 92663 Contact: Not reported Contact Phone: Not reported DUNS Number: Not reported NPDES Number: Not reported EPA ID: Not reported Comments: Not reported Status: Active 41 SHELL OIL (FORMER) NNW 3600 COAST 1/4-1/2 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92625 0.322 mi. Latitude: 1702 ft. Longitude: Relative: LUST: Higher Region: Global id: Actual: Latitude: 19 ft. Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: Potential Contaminants of Concern: Site History: STATE T0605926684 33.594546 -117.86831 LUST Cleanup Site Completed - Case Closed 08/01/2006 ORANGE COUNTY LOP JK ORANGE COUNTY LOP Not reported 03UT002 Local Agency Warehouse Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Gasoline Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: LUST: Global id: Contact Type: Contact Name: Organization Name: Address: City: Email: Phone Number: T0605926684 Local Agency Caseworker DENAMARIE BAKER ORANGE COUNTY LOP 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 SANTA ANA dbaker@ochca.com 7144336255 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5101631434 LUST 5104791776 NIA TC3396733.2s Page 87 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number SHELL OIL (FORMER) (Continued) 5104791776 Global Id: T0605926684 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: CARL BERNHARDT Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: 9517824495 LUST: T0605926684 Global Id: T0605926684 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 01/08/2003 Action: Notice of Responsibility Global Id: T0605926684 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 02/15/2005 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605926684 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 01/27/2004 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605926684 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 05/19/2004 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605926684 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 08/01/2006 Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter Global Id: T0605926684 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Began Global Id: T0605926684 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605926684 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Reported Global Id: T0605926684 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Excavation Region: STATE TC3396733.2s Page 88 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number SHELL OIL (FORMER) (Continued) Global Id: Latitude: Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: Potential Contaminants of Concern: Site History: T0605900266 33.594696 -117.868168 LUST Cleanup Site Completed - Case Closed 04/25/2001 ORANGE COUNTY LOP JK ORANGE COUNTY LOP 083000340T 86UT030 Local Agency Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Gasoline Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility LUST: T0605900266 Global Id: T0605900266 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 Global Id: T0605900266 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: CARL BERNHARDT Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: 9517824495 ORANGE CO. LUST: ORANGE Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 86UT030 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 04/25/2001 Case Type: Other Ground Water Record ID: RO0001474 Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 03UT002 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 08/01/2006 Case Type: Other Ground Water Record ID: RO0003121 LUST REG 8: Region: 5104791776 TC3396733.2s Page 89 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number SHELL OIL (FORMER) (Continued) 5104791776 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: 083000944T Local Case Num: Not reported Case Type: Soil only Substance: Gasoline Qty Leaked: Not reported Abate Method: Not reported Cross Street: GOLDEN ROD Enf Type: CLOS Funding: State Funds How Discovered: Not reported How Stopped: Not reported Leak Cause: Not reported Leak Source: Not reported GloballID T0605900751 How Stopped Date: Not reported Enter Date: 12/17/1984 Review Date: Not reported Prelim Assess: Not reported Discover Date: Not reported Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: 12/17/1984 Workplan: Not reported Pollution Char: Not reported Remed Plan: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: 12/17/1984 GW Qualifies: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported Operator: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: Not reported Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: 33.6359361 Longitude: -117.876406 MTBE Date: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Concentration: 0 Max MTBE Soil: Not reported MTBE Fuel: 1 MTBE Tested: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed. MTBE Class: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORA Staff: CAB Staff Initials: Not reported Lead Agency: Regional Board Local Agency: 30000 Hydr Basin #: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORA Beneficial: Not reported Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: Not reported TC3396733.2s Page 90 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 42 ETCO HOMES NPDES 5108086682 South 2300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD SLIC N/A 114-112 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 Global Id: 0.434 mi. Lead Agency: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) 2289 ft. Not reported Latitude: Relative: NPDES: -117.928088307381 Higher Npdes Number: CAG918002 MGC Facility Status: Active Actual: Agency Id: 465305 10 ft. Region: 8 Potential Contaminants of Concern: Regulatory Measure Id: 369990 Not reported Order No: R8-2007-0041 Regulatory Measure Type: Enrollee Place Id: 743151 WDID: 8303565001 Program Type: NPDES Adoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: 09/11/2008 Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: 09/11/2008 Expiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 11/01/2012 Termination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reported Discharge Name: ETCO Investment Discharge Address: 2222 Newport Boulevard Discharge City: Newport Beach Discharge State: CA Discharge Zip: 92663 SLIC: HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN Region: STATE Facility Status: Open - Site Assessment Status Date: 07/19/2006 Global Id: SL0605958194 Lead Agency: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Lead Agency Case Number: Not reported Latitude: 33.6109202222234 Longitude: -117.928088307381 Case Type: Cleanup Program Site Case Worker: MGC Local Agency: Not reported RB Case Number: Not reported File Location: Not reported Potential Media Affected: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water), Soil Potential Contaminants of Concern: Copper, Chromium, Lead Site History: Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: 43 HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN North ONE HOAG DRIVE 1/4-1/2 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0.458 mi. 2420 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: RCRA-LQG: 27 ft. Date form received by agency: 06/10/2010 Facility name: HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN RCRA-LQG 1000232033 FINDS CAD981388408 CA FID UST HIST UST SWEEPS UST HAZNET EMI ENVIROSTOR TC3396733.2s Page 91 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN (Continued) EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000232033 Facility address: ONE HOAG DRIVE Owner/operator address: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 EPA ID: CAD981388408 Contact: ROXANNA BRYANT Contact address: ONE HOAG DRIVE PO BOX 6100 Legal status: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 Contact country: us Contact telephone: (949) 764-8010 Contact email: ROXANNA.BRYANT@HOAGHOSPITAL.ORG EPA Region: 09 Land type: Private Classification: Large Quantity Generator Description: Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 100 kg of that material at any time Owner/Operator Summary Owner/operator name: HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PREBYTERIAN Owner/operator address: ONE HOAG DRIVE PO BOX 6100 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 Owner/operator country: u5 Owner/operator telephone: (949) 764-4488 Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner Owner/Op start date: 06/05/1944 Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/operator name: NOT REQUIRED Owner/operator address: NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: (415) 555-1212 Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Operator Owner/Op start date: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/operator name: HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PREBYTERIAN Owner/operator address: Not reported Not reported Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Operator Owner/Op start date: 06/05/1944 Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/operator name: HOAG HOSP PRIES CORP TC3396733.2s Page 92 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN (Continued) Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Not reported (415) 555-1212 Private Owner Not reported Not reported Handler Activities Summary: Facility name: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): Yes Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Historical Generators: Date form received by agency: 0211912008 Facility name: HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN Classification: Large Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 01/27/2006 Facility name: HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN Classification: Small Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 01/27/2006 Facility name: HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN Classification: Large Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 02/13/2004 Facility name: HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN Classification: Large Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 09101/1996 Facility name: HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN Site name: HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL Classification: Small Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 03127/1996 Facility name: HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN Site name: HOAG HOSPITOL Classification: Large Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 04/1511994 Facility name: HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN Site name: HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000232033 TC3396733.2s Page 93 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN (Continued) Classification: Large Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 03/16/1992 Facility name: HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN Site name: HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL Classification: Large Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 02/18/1986 Facility name: HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN Site name: HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL Classification: Large Quantity Generator Hazardous Waste Summary: Waste code: 151 Waste name: 151 Waste code: 181 Waste name: 181 Waste code: 221 Waste name: 221 Waste code: 223 Waste name: 223 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000232033 Waste code: 331 Waste name: 331 Waste code: 343 Waste name: 343 Waste code: 352 Waste name: 352 Waste code: 461 Waste name: 461 Waste code: 551 Waste name: 551 Waste code: D001 Waste name: IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. Waste code: D002 Waste name: A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. TC3396733.2s Page 94 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN (Continued) 1000232033 Waste code: 0003 Waste name: A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. Waste code: Waste name: Waste code: Waste name: D007 CHROMIUM D008 LEAD Waste code: F003 Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON -HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N -BUTYL ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT NON -HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON -HALOGENATED SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. Waste code: P030 Waste name: CYANIDES (SOLUBLE CYANIDE SALTS), NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED Waste code: P075 Waste name: NICOTINE, & SALTS Waste code: U010 Waste name: AZIRINO[2',3':3,4]PYRROLO[1,2-A]INDOLE-4,7-DIONE, 6 -AMINO -8 -[[(AMI NOCARBONYL)OXY]METHYL]- 1,1A,2,8,BA,8B-HEXAHYDRO-BA-METHOXY-S-METHYL-, [1AS-(1AALPHA, 8B ETA,BAAL PHA, 8 BALPHA)]- Waste code: U058 Waste name: CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE Waste code: U122 Waste name: FORMALDEHYDE Waste code: U132 Waste name: HEXACHLOROPHENE Waste code: U206 Waste name: GLUCOPYRANOSE, 2-DEOXY-2-(3-METHYL-3-NITROSOUREIDO}, D - Biennial Reports: Last Biennial Reporting Year: 2011 Annual Waste Handled: Waste code: D001 Waste name: IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE TC3396733.2s Page 95 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN (Continued) 1000232033 FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. Amount (Lbs): 14581 Waste code: D002 Waste name: A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. Amount (Lbs): 102 Waste code: D003 Waste name: A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. Amount (Lbs): 160 Waste code: D007 Waste name: CHROMIUM Amount (Lbs): 50 Waste code: D008 Waste name: LEAD Amount (Lbs): 2780 Waste code: F003 Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON -HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N -BUTYL ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT NON -HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON -HALOGENATED SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. Amount (Lbs): 32064.2 Waste code: P030 Waste name: CYANIDES (SOLUBLE CYANIDE SALTS), NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED Amount (Lbs): 85 Waste code: P075 Waste name: NICOTINE, & SALTS Amount (Lbs): 475 Waste code: U010 Waste name: AZIRINO[2',3':3,4]PYRROLO[1,2-A]INDOLE-4,7-DIONE, 6 -AMINO -8 -[[(AMI NOCARBONYL)OXY]METHYL]- 1,1A,2,8,8A,8B-HEXAHYDRO-8A-METHOXY-5-METHYL-, [IAS-(1AALPHA, TC3396733.2s Page 96 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN (Continued) EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: 8B ETA,BAAL PHA, 8 BALPHA)]- Amount (Lbs): 625 Waste code: U050 Waste name: CHRYSENE Amount (Lbs): 300 Waste code: U058 Waste name: CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE Amount (Lbs): 625 Waste code: U059 Waste name: DAUNOMYCIN Amount (Lbs): 300 Waste code: U122 Waste name: FORMALDEHYDE Amount (Lbs): 110 Waste code: U132 Waste name: HEXACHLOROPHENE Amount (Lbs): 491 Waste code: U206 Waste name: GLUCOPYRANOSE, 2-DEOXY-2-(3-METHYL-3-NITROSOUREIDO)-, D - Amount (Lbs): 300 Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: Regulation violated: Not reported Area of violation: Generators - General Date violation determined: 03/09/2009 Date achieved compliance: 03/11/2009 Violation lead agency: State Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action date: 03/09/2009 Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: State Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Regulation violated: FR - 262.10-12.A Area of violation: Generators - General Date violation determined: 08/11/1992 Date achieved compliance: 09/19/1994 Violation lead agency: State Enforcement action: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Ent. disp. status date: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported 1000232033 TC3396733.2s Page 97 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN (Continued) 1000232033 Evaluation Action Summary: Evaluation: Evaluation date: 03/09/2009 Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Area of violation: Generators - General Date achieved compliance: 03/11/2009 Evaluation lead agency: State Evaluation date: 09/19/1994 Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Area of violation: Not reported Date achieved compliance: Not reported Evaluation lead agency: State Contractor/Grantee Evaluation date: 08/11/1992 Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Area of violation: Generators - General Date achieved compliance: 09/19/1994 Evaluation lead agency: State Contractor/Grantee FINDS: Registry ID: 110009535191 Environmental Interest/information System AFS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) Facility Subsystem) replaces the former Compliance Data System (CDS), the National Emission Data System (NEDS), and the Storage and Retrieval of Aerometric Data (SAROAD). AIRS is the national repository for information concerning airborne pollution in the United States. AFS is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. AFS data are utilized by states to prepare State Implementation Plans to comply with regulatory programs and by EPA as an input for the estimation of total national emissions. AFS is undergoing a major redesign to support facility operating permits required under Title V of the Clean Air Act. The NEI (National Emissions Inventory) database contains information on stationary and mobile sources that emit criteria air pollutants and their precursors, as well as hazardous air pollutants (HAPS). California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal facilities. RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. HAZARDOUS WASTE BIENNIAL REPORTER CA FID UST: Facility ID: 30006014 TC3396733.2s Page 98 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN (Continued) 1000232033 Regulated By: UTNKA Regulated ID: Not reported Cortese Code: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported Facility Phone: 7146458600 Mail To: Not reported Mailing Address: 301 NEWPORT BLVD P O BOX Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH 92663 Contact: Not reported Contact Phone: Not reported DUNS Number: Not reported NPDES Number: Not reported EPA ID: Not reported Comments: Not reported Status: Active HIST UST: 001 Region: STATE Facility ID: 00000014293 Facility Type: Other Other Type: HOSPITAL Total Tanks: 0003 Contact Name: Not reported Telephone: 7147602007 Owner Name: HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYT Owner Address: 301 NEWPORT BLVD., BOX Y Owner City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 Tank Num: 001 Container Num: 2 Year Installed: 1979 Tank Capacity: 00000550 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: DIESEL Tank Construction: 12 gauge Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Tank Num: 002 Container Num: TANK 1A Year Installed: 1970 Tank Capacity: 00015000 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: DIESEL Tank Construction: 1/4 inches Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Tank Num: 003 Container Num: TANK 1A Year Installed: 1970 Tank Capacity: 00015000 Tank Used for: PRODUCT Type of Fuel: DIESEL Tank Construction: 1/4 inches Leak Detection: Stock Inventor TC3396733.2s Page 99 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN (Continued) SWEEPS UST: Status: Comp Number: Number: Board Of Equalization: Ref Date: Act Date: Created Date: Tank Status: Owner Tank Id: Swrcb Tank Id: Actv Date: Capacity: Tank Use: Stg: Content: Number Of Tanks: Status: Comp Number: Number: Board Of Equalization: Ref Date: Act Date: Created Date: Tank Status: Owner Tank Id: Swrcb Tank Id: Actv Date: Capacity: Tank Use: Stg: Content: Number Of Tanks: Status: Comp Number: Number: Board Of Equalization: Ref Date: Act Date: Created Date: Tank Status: Owner Tank Id: Swrcb Tank Id: Actv Date: Capacity: Tank Use: Stg: Content: Number Of Tanks: Status: Comp Number: Number: Board Of Equalization: Ref Date: Not reported 4877 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 30-000-004877-000001 Not reported 15000 UNKNOWN PRODUCT Not reported 2 Not reported 4877 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 30-000-004877-000002 Not reported 15000 UNKNOWN PRODUCT Not reported Not reported A 4877 9 Not reported 09-30-92 09-15-92 02-29-88 A Not reported 30-000-004877-000003 Not reported 550 M.V. FUEL P DIESEL 3 A 4877 9 Not reported 09-30-92 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000232033 TC3396733.2s Page 100 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN (Continued) 1000232033 Act Date: 09-15-92 Created Date: 02-29-88 Tank Status: A Owner Tank Id: Not reported Swrcb Tank Id: 30-000-004877-000007 Actv Date: Not reported Capacity: 10000 Tank Use: M.V. FUEL Stg: P Content: DIESEL Number Of Tanks: Not reported Status: A Comp Number: 4877 Number: 9 Board Of Equalization: Not reported Ref Date: 09-30-92 Act Date: 09-15-92 Created Date: 02-29-88 Tank Status: A Owner Tank to: Not reported Swrcb Tank Id: 30-000-004877-000008 Actv Date: Not reported Capacity: 10000 Tank Use: M.V. FUEL Stg: P Content: DIESEL Number Of Tanks: Not reported HAZNET: Year: 2002 Gepaid: CAD981388408 Contact: SUSANNA MCMAHON/SAFETY OFFICER Telephone: 9497602010 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: ONE HOAG DR BOX 6100 Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926586100 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: Not reported TSD County: Los Angeles Waste Category: Unspecified aqueous solution Disposal Method: Not reported Tons: 0.02 Facility County: Not reported Year: 2002 Gepaid: CAD981388408 Contact: SUSANNA MCMAHON/SAFETY OFFICER Telephone: 9497602010 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: ONE HOAG DR BOX 6100 Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926586100 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: Not reported TSD County: Los Angeles Waste Category: Off -specification, aged or surplus organics Disposal Method: Transfer Station TC3396733.2s Page 101 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN (Continued) 1000232033 Tons: 0.02 Facility County: Not reported Year: 2002 Gepaid: CAD981388408 Contact: SUSANNA MCMAHON/SAFETY OFFICER Telephone: 9497602010 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: ONE HOAG DR BOX 6100 Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926586100 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: Not reported TSD County: Los Angeles Waste Category: Asbestos containing waste Disposal Method: Disposal, Land Fill Tons: 90.99 Facility County: Not reported Year: 2002 Gepaid: CAD981388408 Contact: SUSANNA MCMAHON/SAFETY OFFICER Telephone: 9497602010 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: ONE HOAG DR BOX 6100 Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926586100 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: Not reported TSD County: Los Angeles Waste Category: Waste oil and mixed oil Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: 0.25 Facility County: Not reported Year: 2002 Gepaid: CAD981388408 Contact: SUSANNA MCMAHON/SAFETY OFFICER Telephone: 9497602010 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: ONE HOAG DR BOX 6100 Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926586100 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: Not reported TSD County: San Bernardino Waste Category: Other inorganic solid waste Disposal Method: Not reported Tons: 0.00 Facility County: Not reported r:lirk this hTnrrlink while viewing on your computer to access 122 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. EMI: Year: 1990 County Code: 30 Air Basin: Sc Facility ID: 11245 Air District Name: SC TC3396733.2s Page 102 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN (Continued) 1000232033 SIC Code: 8062 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Community Health Air Pollution Info System: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: 2 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 4 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter TonsNr: 0 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr TonsNr: 0 Year: 1993 County Code: 30 Air Basin: SC Facility ID: 11245 Air District Name: SC SIC Code: 8062 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Community Health Air Pollution Info System: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: 5 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 5 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 6 SOX- Oxides of Sulphur TonsNr: 0 Particulate Matter TonsNr: 0 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr TonsNr: 0 Year: 1995 County Code: 30 Air Basin: Sc Facility ID: 11245 Air District Name: SC SIC Code: 8062 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Community Health Air Pollution Info System: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: 5 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 5 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 6 SOX- Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0 Year: 1996 County Code: 30 Air Basin: Sc Facility ID: 11245 Air District Name: SC SIC Code: 8062 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Community Health Air Pollution Info System: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: 6 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 5 TC3396733.2s Page 103 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN (Continued) 1000232033 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 3 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen TonsNr: 9 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 1 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & SmIIr Tons/Yr: 1 Year: 1997 County Code: 30 Air Basin: Sc Facility ID: 11245 Air District Name: Sc SIC Code: 8062 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Community Health Air Pollution Info System: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases TonstYr: 8 Reactive Organic Gases TonsNr: 7 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen TonsNr: 7 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 1 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 1 Year: 1998 County Code: 30 Air Basin: SC Facility ID: 11245 Air District Name: Sc SIC Code: 8062 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Community Health Air Pollution Info System: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases TonsNr: 8 Reactive Organic Gases TonsNr: 7 Carbon Monoxide Emissions TonsfYr: 2 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen TonsNr: 7 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur TonsNr. 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 1 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & SmIIr Tons/Yr: 1 Year: 1999 County Code: 30 Air Basin: SC Facility ID: 11245 Air District Name: SC SIC Code: 8062 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Community Health Air Pollution Info System: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: 8 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 7 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen TonsNr: 7 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 1 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 1 TC3396733.2s Page 104 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN (Continued) 1000232033 Year: 2000 County Code: 30 Air Basin: SC Facility ID: 11245 Air District Name: SC SIC Code: 8062 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Community Health Air Pollution Info System: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases TonsNr: 8 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 7 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 7 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 1 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr TonsNr. 1 Year: 2001 County Code: 30 Air Basin: SC Facility ID: 11245 Air District Name: SC SIC Code: 8062 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Community Health Air Pollution Info System: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases TonsNr: 5 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 4 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 6 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 5 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur TonsNr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 1 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr TonsNr. 1 ENVIROSTOR: Site Type: Tiered Permit Site Type Detailed: Tiered Permit Acres: Not reported NPL: NO Regulatory Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED Program Manager: Not reported Supervisor: Not reported Division Branch: Cleanup Cypress Facility ID: 71002787 Site Code: Not reported Assembly: 74 Senate: 37 Special Program: Not reported Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation Status Date: Not reported Restricted Use: NO Site Mgmt. Req.: NONE SPECIFIED Funding: Not reported Latitude: 33.62115 Longitude: -117.9294 APN: NONE SPECIFIED TC3396733.2s Page 105 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN (Continued) Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIED Confirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Description: NONE SPECIFIED Alias Name: CAD981388408 Alias Type: EPA Identification Number Alias Name: 71002787 Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: SUNNY FRESH CLEANERS Completed Area Name: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Date: Not reported Comments: Not reported Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported 44 SUNNY FRESH CLEANERS North 306 OLD NEWPORT BLVD 114-112 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0.489 mi. 8 2584 ft. WDM Relative: SLIC: Higher Region: Facility Status: Actual: Status Date: 33 ft. Global Id: Lead Agency: Lead Agency Case Number: Latitude: Longitude: Case Type: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affected: Potential Contaminants of Concern: Site History: STATE Completed - Case Closed 08/14/2003 SLT8R0813964 ORANGE COUNTY 021C018 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 33.619687387732 -117.889850071299 Cleanup Program Site Not reported Not reported Not reported Local Agency Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water), Soil Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: SLIC REG 8: Type: Soil and Groundwater Facility Status: Initial Investigation Underway Region: 8 Staff: WDM Substance: WDM 1000232033 SLIC 5104549226 HAZNET N/A TC3396733.2s Page 106 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number SUNNY FRESH CLEANERS (Continued) 5104549226 Lead Agency: WDM Location Code: WDM Thomas Bros Code: WDM HAZNET: 2007 Year: 2008 Gepaid: CAL000304067 Contact: DONG SOO KIM AKA DAVID KIM Telephone: 9496422671 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 306 OLD NEWPORT BLVD Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926634121 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: NVR000076158 TSD County: 99 Waste Category: Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene, Disposal Method: etc) Disposal Method: Solvents Recovery Tons: 0.1251 Facility County: Orange Year: 2007 Gepaid: CAL000304067 Contact: DONG SOO KIM AKA DAVID KIM Telephone: 9496422671 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 306 OLD NEWPORT BLVD Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926634121 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: NVR000076158 TSD County: 99 Waste Category: Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene, Disposal Method: etc) Disposal Method: Solvents Recovery Tons: 0.12 Facility County: Orange Year: 2007 Gepaid: CAL000304067 Contact: DONG SOO KIM AKA DAVID KIM Telephone: 9496422671 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 306 OLD NEWPORT BLVD Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926634121 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: NVR000076158 TSD County: 99 Waste Category: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent Disposal Method: Solvents Recovery Tons: Not reported Facility County: Orange Year: 2007 Gepaid: CAL000304067 Contact: DONG SOO KIM AKA DAVID KIM Telephone: 9496422671 Mailing Name: Not reported TC3396733.2s Page 107 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS CAL000304067 SUNNY FRESH CLEANERS (Continued) DOING SOO KIM AKA DAVID KIM Mailing Address: 306 OLD NEWPORT BLVD Mailing Name: Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926634121 306 OLD NEWPORT BLVD Gen County: Orange Gen County: TSD EPA ID: NVR000076158 NVR000076158 TSD County: 99 Waste Category: Waste Category: Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, Etc.) Not reported Disposal Method: Solvents Recovery Facility County: Tons: Not reported Clink this hVpedink while viewing on your computer to access Facility County: Orange EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Year: 2006 Gepaid: CAL000304067 Contact: DOING SOO KIM AKA DAVID KIM Telephone: 9496422671 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 306 OLD NEWPORT BLVD Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926634121 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: NVR000076158 TSD County: 99 Waste Category: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent Disposal Method: Not reported Tons: Not reported Facility County: Orange Clink this hVpedink while viewing on your computer to access additional CA_HAZNET: detail in the EDR Site Report. 5104549226 45 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA SEA BASE HIST CORTESE 5102425585 East 1931 COAST LUST NIA 1/4-112 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92659 0.494 mi. 2607 ft. Relative: CORTESE: Higher Region: Facility County Code: Actual: Reg By: 14 ft. Reg Id: LUST: Region: Global Id: Latitude: Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: CORTESE 30 LTNKA 083001534T STATE T0605901174 33.6073972 -117.8785764 LUST Cleanup Site Completed - Case Closed 08/08/1990 ORANGE COUNTY LOP JK ORANGE COUNTY LOP 083001534T 90UT132 Local Agency Soil Potential Contaminants of Concern: Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / Lubricating Site History: Not reported TC3396733.2s Page 108 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA SEA BASE (Continued) 5102425585 Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility LUST: T0605901174 Global Id: T0605901174 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 Global Id: T0605901174 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: PATRICIA HANNON Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: phannon@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: Not reported LUST: Global Id: T0605901174 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605901174 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Reported ORANGE CO. LUST: Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 90UT132 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Waste oil/Used oil Date Closed: 08/08/1990 Case Type: Soil Only Record ID: RO0002551 LUST REG 8: Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: 083001534T Local Case Num: 90UT132 Case Type: Soil only Substance: Waste Oil Qty Leaked: 0 Abate Method: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Enf Type: Not reported TC3396733.2s Page 109 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA SEA BASE (Continued) Funding: How Discovered: How Stopped: Leak Cause: Leak Source: Global ID: How Stopped Date: Enter Date: Review Date: Prelim Assess: Discover Date: Enforcement Date: Close Date: Workplan: Pollution Char: Remed Plan: Remed Action: Monitoring: Enter Date: GW Qualifies: Soil Qualifies: Operator: Facility Contact: Interim: Oversite Program: Latitude: Longitude: MTBE Date: Max MTBE GW: MTBE Concentration: Max MTBE Soil: MTBE Fuel: MTBE Tested: MTBE Class: Staff: Staff Initials: Lead Agency: Local Agency: Hydr Basin #: Beneficial: Not reported Tank Closure Close Tank Unknown Unknown T0605901174 9/9/9999 Not reported Not reported Not reported 5/7/1990 Not reported 8/8/1990 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported LUST 33.6174973 -117.9188711 Not reported Not reported 0 Not reported 0 Not Required to be Tested. PAH JK Local Agency 30000L Not reported MAR EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5102425585 HIST CORTESE 5101481404 ENVIROSTOR N/A TC3396733.2s Page 110 Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: Not reported 46 ORANGE COUNTY REFINING CO. WELL #3 WNW 21342ND ST. 1/2-1 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 0.598 mi. 3158 ft. Relative: CORTESE: Higher Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 30 Actual: Reg By: CALSI 9 ft. Reg Id: 30130028 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5102425585 HIST CORTESE 5101481404 ENVIROSTOR N/A TC3396733.2s Page 110 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site ORANGE COUNTY REFINING CO. WELL #3 (Continued) ENVIROSTOR: Future Area Name: Site Type: Evaluation Site Type Detailed: Evaluation Acres: 0 NPL: NO Regulatory Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED Program Manager: Majed Al Shami Supervisor: Manny Alonzo Division Branch: Cleanup Cypress Facility ID: 30130028 Site Code: Not reported Assembly: 74 Senate: 37 Special Program: EPA - PASI Status: Refer: Local Agency Status Date: 01/11/2011 Restricted Use: NO Site Mgmt. Req.: NONE SPECIFIED Funding: Not reported Latitude: 33.62019 Longitude: -117.9367 APN: NONE SPECIFIED Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED Potential COC: 10196 Confirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Description: NONE SPECIFIED Alias Name: 30130028 Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: Completed Area Name: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Date: Not reported Comments: Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5101481404 ENVIROSTOR 1000404993 NIA TC3396733.2s Page 111 Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported 47 SOUTH BASIN OIL COMPANY WNW 204/206 43RD STREET 1/2-1 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0.634 mi. 3345 ft. Relative: ENVIROSTOR: Higher Site Type: Historical Site Type Detailed: * Historical Actual: Acres: Not reported 10 ft. NPL: NO EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5101481404 ENVIROSTOR 1000404993 NIA TC3396733.2s Page 111 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site SOUTH BASIN OIL COMPANY (Continued) Regulatory Agencies: Lead Agency: Program Manager: Supervisor: Division Branch: Facility ID: Site Code: Assembly: Senate: Special Program: Status: Status Date: Restricted Use: Site Mgmt. Req.: Funding: Latitude: Longitude: APN: Past Use: Potential COC: Confirmed COC: Potential Description: Alias Name: Alias Type: Alias Name: Alias Type: Alias Name: Alias Type: NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED Not reported * Mmonroy Cleanup Cypress 30130024 Not reported 74 37 * CERC2 Refer: Other Agency 05/23/1988 NO NONE SPECIFIED Not reported 33.62 -117.9372 NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED 10009, 10196, 10199 NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED ORANGE CO REFINING COMPANY Alternate Name CAD982359408 EPA Identification Number 30130024 Envirostor ID Number EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Completed Info: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Site Screening Completed Date: 10/28/1994 Comments: SITE SCREENING/FILE REVIEW DETERMINE NFA FOR DTSC. 1000404993 Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Preliminary Assessment Report Completed Date: 05/23/1988 Comments: PRELIM ASSESS DONE NFA; WELL HAS BEEN PROPERLY ABANDONED IN Schedule Sub Area Name: ACCORDANCE WITH DOG POLICIES. Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported TC3396733.2s Page 112 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site 48 NE 112-1 0.776 mi 4099 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 88 ft. K49 North 112-1 0.949 mi. 5013 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 100 ft. NEWPORT BEACH FCS NEWPORT BEACH, CA FUDS: Federal Facility ID: FUDS #: INST ID: Facility Name: City: State: EPA Region: County: Congressional District: US Army District: Fiscal Year: Telephone: NPL Status: RAB: CTC: Current Owner: FUDS Description Details: FUDS History Details: MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number FUDS 1009484708 N/A CA97991`5533 J09CA0512 61134 NEWPORT BEACH FCS NEWPORT BEACH CA 9 ORANGE 48 Los Angeles District (SPL) 2009 213-452-3920 Not reported Not reported Not reported PRIVATE THE SITE CONSISTED OF APPROXIMATELY 6 ACRES. THE SITE WAS USED AS A FIRE CONTROL STATION BY THE ARMY FROM 1941 TO 1943. IMPROVEMENTS WERE MADE TO THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF UPON TERMINATION OF LEASE. FUDS Current Program Details: FUDS Future Program Details: HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO 500 SUPERIOR AVE NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 Site 1 of 2 in cluster K RCRA-TSDF: Date form received by agency: 12/18/2006 Facility name: NEWPORT HEALTH CENTER LLC Facility address: 500 SUPERIOR AVE NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 EPA ID: CAD057468944 Contact: GEORGE M DIAZ Contact address: 500 SUPERIOR AVE NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 Contact country: US Contact telephone: 949-764-4493 Contact email: GEORGE.DIAZ@HOAGHOSPITAL.ORG EPA Region: 09 RCRA-TSDF 1000240988 CERC-NFRAP CAD057468944 CORRACTS RCRA-SQG FINDS LUST HAZNET HWP 2020 COR ACTION TC3396733.2s Page 113 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO (Continued) MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Land type: Private Classification: TSDF Description: Handler is engaged in the treatment, storage or disposal of hazardous waste Owner/Operator Summary Owner/operator name: HOAG MEMORIAL Owner/operator address: 500 SUPERIOR AVE Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 Owner/operator country: US Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner Owner/Op start date: 02/08/2006 Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/operator name: HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN Owner/operator address: Not reported Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): Not reported Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Operator Owner/Op start date: 02/08/2006 Owner/Op end date: Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Historical Generators: Date form received by agency: 1012312000 Facility name: NEWPORT HEALTH CENTER LLC Site name: RAYTHEON SYSTEMS CO Classification: Not a generator, verified Date form received by agency: 10/12/2000 Facility name: NEWPORT HEALTH CENTER LLC Site name: RAYTHEON STYSTEMS COMPANY Classification: Large Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 03/04/1999 Facility name: NEWPORT HEALTH CENTER LLC 1000240988 TC3396733.2s Page 114 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO (Continued) 1000240988 Site name: MICROELECTRONICS DIV, RAYTHEON SYSTEMS Classification: Large Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 0210411998 Facility name: NEWPORT HEALTH CENTER LLC Site name: RAYTHEON SYSTEMS CO Classification: Small Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 09101/1996 Facility name: NEWPORT HEALTH CENTER LLC Site name: RAYTHEON SYSTEMS CO Classification: Large Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 03126/1996 Facility name: NEWPORT HEALTH CENTER LLC Site name: NEWPORT BEACH Classification: Large Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 03/3011994 Facility name: NEWPORT HEALTH CENTER LLC Site name: HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY Classification: Large Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 02/28/1992 Facility name: NEWPORT HEALTH CENTER LLC Site name: HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY Classification: Large Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 0410911990 Facility name: NEWPORT HEALTH CENTER LLC Site name: HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY Classification: Large Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 08/18/1980 Facility name: NEWPORT HEALTH CENTER LLC Site name: RAYTHEON SYSTEMS CO Classification: Large Quantity Generator Hazardous Waste Summary: Waste code: D008 Waste name: LEAD Corrective Action Summary: Event date: 06/01/1983 Event: CA029WQ Event date: 06101/1983 Event: CA049PA Event date: 06/01/1983 Event: CA074HI Event date: 08/18/1983 Event: RFI Imposition Event date: 03/12/1990 TC3396733.2s Page 115 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO (Continued) 1000240988 Event: CA049SI Event date: 08/15/1990 Event: CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a high corrective evaluation has been completed, but further data is necessary to action priority. Event date: 10/31/1991 Event: CA036WQ Event date: 10/25/1994 Event: Stabilization Measures Evaluation,This facility is not amenable to stabilization activity because of a lack of technical data. An Event date: evaluation has been completed, but further data is necessary to Event: determine stabilization measures, feasibility or appropriateness. This Event date: status should be changed when data becomes available. Event date: 10/27/1994 Event: CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a medium corrective Event: action priority. Event date: 12/02/1997 Event: Current Human Exposures under Control, More information is needed to Event: make a determination. Event date: 12/02/1997 Event: Igration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, Unacceptable migration of contaminated groundwater is observed or expected. Event date: 12/02/1997 Event: CA Responsibility Referred To A Non-RCRA Federal Authority Event date: 12/08/1999 Event: RFA Completed, Assessment was an RFA. Event date: 03109/2001 Event: Current Human Exposures under Control, Current human exposures are NOT under control. Event date: 03/09/2001 Event: Igration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, Unacceptable migration of contaminated groundwater is observed or expected. Event date: 09/23/2005 Event: Current Human Exposures under Control, Yes, Current Human Exposures Under Control has been verified. Based on a review of information contained in the EI determination, current human exposures are expected to be under control at the facility under current and reasonably expected conditions. This determination will be re-evaluated when the Agency/State becomes aware of significant changes at the facility. Event date: 12/07/2005 Event: Igration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, Yes, Migration of Contaminated Groundwater Under Control has been verified. Based on a review of information contained in the EI determination, it has been determined that migration of contaminated groundwater is under control at the facility. Specifically, this determination indicates that the TC3396733.2s Page 116 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO (Continued) MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number migration of contaminated groundwater is under control, and that monitoring will be conducted to confirm that contaminated groundwater remains within the existing area of contaminated groundwater. This determination will be re-evaluated when the Agency becomes aware of significant changes at the facility. Event date: 09/07/2006 Event: Date For Remedy Selection (CM Imposed) Event date: 03/25/2008 Event: CA550RC Event date: Not reported Event: CA048ST Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: Regulation violated: FR - 264.110-120.G Area of violation: TSD - Closure/Post-Closure Date violation determined: 12/10/1993 Date achieved compliance: 12/10/1993 Violation lead agency: State Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action date: 12/10/1993 Ent. disposition status: Not reported Ent. disp. status date: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: State Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Regulation violated: Area of violation: Date violation determined: Date achieved compliance: Violation lead agency: Enforcement action: Enforcement action date: Enf. disposition status: Enf. disp. status date: Enforcement lead agency: Proposed penalty amount: Final penalty amount: Paid penalty amount: Regulation violated: Area of violation: Date violation determined: Date achieved compliance: Violation lead agency: Enforcement action: Enforcement action date: Enf. disposition status: Ent. disp. status date: Enforcement lead agency: Proposed penalty amount: Final penalty amount: Paid penalty amount: FR - 264.170-177.1 TSD - General 12/10/1993 12/10/1993 State WRITTEN INFORMAL 12/10/1993 Not reported Not reported State Not reported Not reported Not reported F - 268 ALL LDR - General 02/22/1991 08/14/1991 State Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 1000240988 TC3396733.2s Page 117 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO (Continued) Regulation violated: Area of violation: Date violation determined: Date achieved compliance: Violation lead agency: Enforcement action: Enforcement action date: Enf. disposition status: Enf. disp. status date: Enforcement lead agency: Proposed penalty amount: Final penalty amount: Paid penalty amount: Regulation violated: Area of violation: Date violation determined: Date achieved compliance: Violation lead agency: Enforcement action: Enforcement action date: Enf. disposition status: Enf. disp. status date: Enforcement lead agency: Proposed penalty amount: Final penalty amount: Paid penalty amount: Regulation violated: Area of violation: Date violation determined: Date achieved compliance: Violation lead agency: Enforcement action: Enforcement action date: Enf. disposition status: Enf. disp. status date: Enforcement lead agency: Proposed penalty amount: Final penalty amount: Paid penalty amount: Regulation violated: Area of violation: Date violation determined: Date achieved compliance: Violation lead agency: Enforcement action: Enforcement action date: Enf. disposition status: Ent. disp. status date: Enforcement lead agency: Proposed penalty amount: Final penalty amount: Paid penalty amount: Regulation violated: F - 268.7 LDR - General 02/22/1991 08/14/1991 State Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported F -270 TSD - General 02/22/1991 08/14/1991 State Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported F - 268 ALL LDR - General 01/09/1991 08/14/1991 State WRITTEN INFORMAL 02/22/1991 Not reported Not reported State Not reported Not reported Not reported F - 268.7 LDR - General 01/09/1991 08/14/1991 State WRITTEN INFORMAL 02/22/1991 Not reported Not reported State Not reported Not reported Not reported 1AW1cf-71111111 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000240988 TC3396733.2s Page 118 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO (Continued) 1000240988 Area of violation: LDR - General Date violation determined: 01/09/1991 Date achieved compliance: 08/14/1991 Violation lead agency: State Enforcement action: FINAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE ORDER Enforcement action date: 03/21/1991 Ent. disposition status: Not reported Ent. disp. status date: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: State Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Regulation violated: F - 270 Area of violation: TSD - General Date violation determined: 01/09/1991 Date achieved compliance: 08/14/1991 Violation lead agency: State Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action date: 02/22/1991 Ent. disposition status: Not reported Ent. disp. status date: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: State Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Regulation violated: F - 270 Area of violation: TSD - General Date violation determined: 01/09/1991 Date achieved compliance: 08/14/1991 Violation lead agency: State Enforcement action: FINAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE ORDER Enforcement action date: 03/21/1991 Ent. disposition status: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: State Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Regulation violated: F - 268.7 Area of violation: LDR - General Date violation determined: 01/09/1991 Date achieved compliance: 08/14/1991 Violation lead agency: State Enforcement action: FINAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE ORDER Enforcement action date: 03/21/1991 Ent. disposition status: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: State Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Regulation violated: F - 268.7 Area of violation: LDR - General TC3396733.2s Page 119 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO (Continued) Date violation determined: Date achieved compliance: Violation lead agency: Enforcement action: Enforcement action date: Ent. disposition status: Ent. disp. status date: Enforcement lead agency: Proposed penalty amount: Final penalty amount: Paid penalty amount: Regulation violated: Area of violation: Date violation determined: Date achieved compliance: Violation lead agency: Enforcement action: Enforcement action date: Enf. disposition status: Enf. disp. status date: Enforcement lead agency: Proposed penalty amount: Final penalty amount: Paid penalty amount: Regulation violated: Area of violation: Date violation determined: Date achieved compliance: Violation lead agency: Enforcement action: Enforcement action date: Ent. disposition status: Ent. disp. status date: Enforcement lead agency: Proposed penalty amount: Final penalty amount: Paid penalty amount: Evaluation Action Summary: Evaluation date: Evaluation: Area of violation: Date achieved compliance: Evaluation lead agency: Evaluation date: Evaluation: Area of violation: Date achieved compliance: Evaluation lead agency: Evaluation date: Evaluation: Area of violation: Date achieved compliance: 05/04/1988 07/19/1988 State Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported FR - 270 TSD - General 05/04/1988 07/19/1988 State WRITTEN INFORMAL 06/06/1988 Not reported Not reported State Not reported Not reported Not reported F - 268 ALL LDR - General 05/04/1988 07/19/1988 State Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 11/10/1994 FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW Not reported Not reported State 07/18/1994 COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Not reported Not reported State Contractor/Grantee 10/27/1993 COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE TSD - General 12/10/1993 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000240988 TC3396733.2s Page 120 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO (Continued) Evaluation lead agency: State Evaluation date: 10/27/1993 Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Area of violation: TSD - Closure/Post-Closure Date achieved compliance: 12/10/1993 Evaluation lead agency: State Evaluation date: 01/09/1991 Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Area of violation: LDR - General Date achieved compliance: 08/14/1991 Evaluation lead agency: State Evaluation date: 01/09/1991 Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Area of violation: TSD - General Date achieved compliance: 08/14/1991 Evaluation lead agency: State Evaluation date: Evaluation: Area of violation: Date achieved compliance: Evaluation lead agency: 01/03/1991 FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW Not reported Not reported State Evaluation date: 05/25/1988 Evaluation: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW Area of violation: Not reported Date achieved compliance: Not reported Evaluation lead agency: State Evaluation date: 05/04/1988 Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Area of violation: LDR - General Date achieved compliance: 07/19/1988 Evaluation lead agency: State Evaluation date: 05/04/1988 Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Area of violation: TSD - General Date achieved compliance: 07/19/1988 Evaluation lead agency: State EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number CERC-NFRAP: Site ID: 0901457 Federal Facility: Not a Federal Facility NPL Status: Not on the NPL Non NPL Status: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing information CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Contact Details: Contact Sequence ID: 13052684.00000 Person ID: 9271184.00000 Contact Sequence ID: 13285758.00000 Person ID: 13003854.00000 1000240988 TC3396733.2s Page 121 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO (Continued) Contact Sequence ID: 13291353.00000 Person ID: 13003858.00000 Contact Sequence ID: 13297211.00000 Person ID: 13004003.00000 CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History: Action: DISCOVERY Date Started: Not reported Date Completed: 08/01/1980 Priority Level: Not reported Action: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT Date Started: Not reported Date Completed: 06/01/1983 Priority Level: Low priority for further assessment Action: HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM PACKAGE Date Started: Not reported Date Completed: 06/01/1983 Priority Level: Not reported Action: SITE INSPECTION Date Started: Not reported Date Completed: 06/01/1983 Priority Level: Higher priority for further assessment Action: UNILATERAL ADMIN ORDER Date Started: Not reported Date Completed: 08/18/1983 Priority Level: Not reported Action: SITE INSPECTION Date Started: Not reported Date Completed: 03/12/1990 Priority Level: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing information Action: ARCH IVE SITE Date Started: Not reported Date Completed: 03/12/1990 Priority Level: Not reported CORRACTS: EPA ID: CAD057468944 EPA Region: 09 Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Actual Date: 03/09/2001 Action: CA750NO - Migration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, Unacceptable migration of contaminated groundwater is observed or expected NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 All Other Outpatient Care Centers Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: 03/09/2001 1000240988 TC3396733.2s Page 122 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO (Continued) 1000240988 Schedule end date: Not reported EPA ID: CAD057468944 EPA Region: 09 Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Actual Date: 03/09/2001 Action: CA725NO - Current Human Exposures Under Control, Current human NAICS Code(s): exposures are NOT under control NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 All Other Outpatient Care Centers Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners Original schedule date: Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: Not reported Schedule end date: Not reported EPA ID: CAD057468944 EPA Region: 09 Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Actual Date: 03/12/1990 Action: CA049SI NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 All Other Outpatient Care Centers Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: Not reported Schedule end date: Not reported EPA ID: CAD057468944 EPA Region: 09 Area Name: On-site groundwater Actual Date: 03/25/2008 Action: CA550RC NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 All Other Outpatient Care Centers Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: 04/10/2008 Schedule end date: 03/25/2008 EPA ID: CAD057468944 EPA Region: 09 Area Name: VOC-contaminated soil gas Actual Date: 03/25/2008 Action: CA550RC NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 All Other Outpatient Care Centers Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: 04/10/2008 Schedule end date: 03/25/2008 EPA ID: CAD057468944 EPA Region: 09 Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Actual Date: 03/25/2008 Action: CA550RC NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 TC3396733.2s Page 123 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS 09 HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO (Continued) Indoor air on-site and off-site Actual Date: Ail Other Outpatient Care Centers Action: CA550RC Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners 621498 621399 621112 Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: 04/10/2008 Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Schedule and date: 03/25/2008 Schedule end date: EPA ID: CAD057468944 CAD057468944 EPA Region: 09 Area Name: Area Name: VOC-contaminated soil on-site Actual Date: 03/25/2008 Action: CA550RC NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 All Other Outpatient Care Centers Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: 04/10/2008 Schedule and date: 03/25/2008 EPA ID: CAD057468944 EPA Region: 09 Area Name: Indoor air on-site and off-site Actual Date: 03/25/2008 Action: CA550RC NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 All Other Outpatient Care Centers Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: 04/10/2008 Schedule end date: 03/25/2008 EPA ID: CAD057468944 EPA Region: 09 Area Name: Off-site groundwater Actual Date: 03/25/2008 Action: CA550RC NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 All Other Outpatient Care Centers Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: 04/10/2008 Schedule and date: 03/25/2008 EPA ID: CAD057468944 EPA Region: 09 Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Actual Date: 06/01/1983 Action: CA074HI NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 All Other Outpatient Care Centers Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: Not reported Schedule and date: Not reported EPA ID: CAD057468944 EPA Region: 09 Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000240988 TC3396733.2s Page 124 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS 09 HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO (Continued) ENTIRE FACILITY Actual Date: 06/01/1983 Action: Action: CA029WO 621498 621399 621112 NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners All Other Outpatient Care Centers Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners Schedule end date: Not reported Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Not reported Original schedule date: Not reported EPA Region: Schedule end date: Not reported EPA ID: CAD057468944 EPA Region: 09 Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Actual Date: 06/01/1983 Action: CA049PA NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 NAICS Code(s): All Other Outpatient Care Centers Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: Not reported Schedule end date: Not reported EPA ID: CAD057468944 EPA Region: 09 Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Actual Date: 08/15/1990 Action: CA075HI - CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a high NAICS Code(s): corrective action priority NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 All Other Outpatient Care Centers Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners Original schedule date: Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: Not reported Schedule end date: Not reported EPA ID: CAD057468944 EPA Region: 09 Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Actual Date: 08/18/1983 Action: CA100 - RFI Imposition NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 All Other Outpatient Care Centers Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: Not reported Schedule end date: Not reported EPA ID: CAD057468944 EPA Region: 09 Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Actual Date: 09/07/2006 Action: CA400 - Date For Remedy Selection (CM Imposed) NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 All Other Outpatient Care Centers Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: Not reported Schedule end date: Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000240988 TC3396733.2s Page 125 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO (Continued) MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number EPA ID: CAD057468944 EPA Region: 09 Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Actual Date: 09/23/2005 Action: CA725YE - Current Human Exposures Under Control, Yes, Current Human Exposures Under Control has been verified NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 All Other Outpatient Care Centers Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners NAICS Code(s): Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: Not reported Schedule end date: Not reported EPA ID: CAD057468944 EPA Region: 09 Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Actual Date: 10/25/1994 Action: CA225IN - Stabilization Measures Evaluation, This facility is not, amenable to stabilization activity because of, a lack of technical NAICS Code(s): data. An evaluation has been completed, but further data is necessary to determine stabilization measures, feasibility or appropriateness. This status should be changed when data becomes available NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 Original schedule date: All Other Outpatient Care Centers Schedule end date: Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: Not reported Schedule end date: Not reported EPA ID: CAD057468944 EPA Region: 09 Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Actual Date: 10/25/1994 Action: CA2251N - Stabilization Measures Evaluation, This facility is not, amenable to stabilization activity because of, a lack of technical NAICS Code(s): data. An evaluation has been completed, but further data is necessary to determine stabilization measures, feasibility or appropriateness. This status should be changed when data becomes available NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 Original schedule date: All Other Outpatient Care Centers Schedule end date: Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: 10/25/1994 Schedule end date: Not reported EPA ID: CAD057468944 EPA Region: 09 Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Actual Date: 10/27/1994 Action: CA075ME - CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a medium corrective action priority NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 All Other Outpatient Care Centers Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: Not reported Schedule end date: Not reported 1000240988 TC3396733.2s Page 126 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS 09 HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO (Continued) ENTIRE FACILITY EPA ID: CAD057468944 Action: EPA Region: 09 621498 621399 621112 Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Actual Date: 10/31/1991 Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Action: CA036WQ Schedule end date: NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 Not reported All Other Outpatient Care Centers Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: Not reported Schedule end date: Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number EPA ID: CAD057468944 EPA Region: 09 Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Actual Date: 12/02/1997 Action: CA210 - CA Responsibility Referred To A Non-RCRA Federal Authority NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 NAICS Code(s): All Other Outpatient Care Centers Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: Not reported Schedule end date: Not reported EPA ID: CAD057468944 EPA Region: 09 Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Actual Date: 12/02/1997 Action: CA7251N - Current Human Exposures Under Control, More information is NAICS Code(s): needed to make a determination NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 All Other Outpatient Care Centers Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: Not reported Schedule end date: Not reported EPA ID: CAD057468944 EPA Region: 09 Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Actual Date: 12/07/2005 Action: CA750YE - Migration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, Yes, NAICS Code(s): Migration of Contaminated Groundwater Under Control has been verified NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 All Other Outpatient Care Centers Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: Not reported Schedule end date: Not reported EPA ID: CAD057468944 EPA Region: 09 Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Actual Date: 12/08/1999 Action: CA050RF - RFA Completed, Assessment was an RFA NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 All Other Outpatient Care Centers 1000240988 TC3396733.2s Page 127 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO (Continued) FINDS: Registry ID: 110000621257 Environmental Interest/Information System The NEI (National Emissions Inventory) database contains information on stationary and mobile sources that emit criteria air pollutants and their precursors, as well as hazardous air pollutants (HAPS). EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal facilities. US EPA TRIS (Toxics Release Inventory System) contains information from facilities on the amounts of over 300 listed toxic chemicals that these facilities release directly to air, water, land, or that are transported off-site. RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. CRITERIA AND HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT INVENTORY LUST REG 8: Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners Region: Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: Not reported Schedule end date: Not reported EPA ID: CAD057468944 EPA Region: 09 Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY Actual Date: Not reported Action: CA048ST NAICS Code(s): 621498 621399 621112 All Other Outpatient Care Centers Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists Original schedule date: 08/15/1990 Schedule end date: Not reported FINDS: Registry ID: 110000621257 Environmental Interest/Information System The NEI (National Emissions Inventory) database contains information on stationary and mobile sources that emit criteria air pollutants and their precursors, as well as hazardous air pollutants (HAPS). EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal facilities. US EPA TRIS (Toxics Release Inventory System) contains information from facilities on the amounts of over 300 listed toxic chemicals that these facilities release directly to air, water, land, or that are transported off-site. RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. CRITERIA AND HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT INVENTORY LUST REG 8: Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Pollution Characterization Case Number: 083000821T Local Case Num: 90UT247 Case Type: Other ground water affected Substance: Solvents Qty Leaked: Not reported 1000240988 TC3396733.2s Page 128 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO (Continued) Abate Method: GTVE Cross Street: INDUSTRIAL Enf Type: SEL Funding: Not reported How Discovered: Inventory Control How Stopped: Not reported Leak Cause: UNK Leak Source: Tank Global ID: T0605900648 How Stopped Date: 1/1/1981 Enter Date: 4/1/1988 Review Date: Not reported Prelim Assess: Not reported Discover Date: 1/1/1978 Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: Not reported Workplan: Not reported Pollution Char: 6/10/2004 Remed Plan: 1/30/1998 Remed Action: 1/1/2000 Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: 4/1/1988 GW Qualifies: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported Operator: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: No Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: 33.62865649 Longitude: -117.9265335 MTBE Date: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Concentration: 0 Max MTBE Soil: Not reported MTBE Fuel: 0 MTBE Tested: Not Required to be Tested. MTBE Class: Staff: CAB Staff Initials: LAL EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000240988 Lead Agency: Regional Board Local Agency: 30000 Hydr Basin #: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORA Beneficial: Not reported Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: SUBSTAN'L GW CONTAM IN PERCHED & LOWER AQUIFER BELOW SITE. INV & CLEANUP WILL BE REQ'D. UPDATED GW DATA & WP FOR FURTHER WORK DUE 10190.OFFSITE WP SUBMIT'D 8/28/92 4/4/96 GW MON RSLTS 5/30/96 2 NEWPORT AVE WELLS COMPLETE, 3RD BORING ABAN Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: 083000821T Local Case Num: 91 UT054 TC3396733.2s Page 129 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO (Continued) Case Type: Substance: Qty Leaked: Abate Method: Cross Street: Enf Type: Funding: How Discovered: How Stopped: Leak Cause: Leak Source: Global ID: How Stopped Date: Enter Date: Review Date: Prelim Assess: Discover Date: Enforcement Date: Close Date: Workplan: Pollution Char: Remed Plan: Remed Action: Monitoring: Enter Date: GW Qualifies: Soil Qualifies: Operator: Facility Contact: Interim: Oversite Program: Latitude: Longitude: MTBE Date: Max MTBE GW: MTBE Concentration: Max MTBE Soil: MTBE Fuel: MTBE Tested: MTBE Class: Staff: Staff Initials: Lead Agency: Local Agency: Hydr Basin #: Beneficial: Priority: Cleanup Fund Id: Work Suspended: Summary: HAZNET: Year: Gepaid: Contact: Telephone: Mailing Name: Soil only Diesel 0 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Tank Closure Close Tank Unknown Unknown T0605912480 9/9/9999 Not reported Not reported Not reported 5/1/1991 Not reported 8/7/1991 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported LUST 0 0 Not reported Not reported 0 Not reported 0 Not Required to be Tested. CAB JK Local Agency 30000L Not reported MUN Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 2008 CAL000314643 William Cadieux 9497644493 Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000240988 TC3396733.2s Page 130 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO (Continued) Mailing Address: 500 SUPERIOR AVE Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926633657 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: CAT080013352 TSD County: Los Angeles Waste Category: Tank bottom waste Disposal Method: Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Mailing Address: Organics Recovery Ect Tons: 0.1668 Facility County: Orange Year: 2002 Gepaid: CAC002468495 Contact: STEVE ST CLAIR Telephone: 9494776399 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 4001 MACARTHUR BLVD Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926600000 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: Not reported TSD County: Los Angeles Waste Category: Other inorganic solid waste Disposal Method: Transfer Station Tons: 0.07 Facility County: Not reported HWP: EPA Id: Latitude: Longitude: Facility Type: Cleanup Status: Supervisor: Site Code: Assembly District: Senate District: Public Information Officer: Activities: EPA Id: Facility Type: Unit Names: Event Description: Actual Date: CAD057468944 33.62947 -117.9300 Historical - Non -Operating CLOSED Not reported 400223 74 37 Not reported CAD057468944 Historical - Non -Operating CONTAINI, TANKSTRI New Operating Permit - PUBLIC COMMENT (BEGIN) 04/15/1986 EPA Id: CAD057468944 Facility Type: Historical - Non -Operating Unit Names: CONTAINI, TANKSTR1 Event Description: New Operating Permit - FINAL PERMIT (EXPIRES) Actual Date: 06/28/1991 EPA Id: CAD057468944 Facility Type: Historical - Non -Operating Unit Names: CONTAIN1, TANKSTRI Event Description: New Operating Permit - CALL-IN LETTER ISSUED Actual Date: 02/02/1983 1000240988 TC3396733.2s Page 131 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO (Continued) EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number EPA Id: CAD057468944 Facility Type: Historical - Non -Operating Unit Names: CONTAIN1, TANKSTR1 Event Description: New Operating Permit- APPLICATION PART A RECEIVED Actual Date: 11/18/1980 EPA Id: CAD057468944 Facility Type: Historical - Non -Operating Unit Names: CONTAINI, TANKSTR1 Event Description: New Operating Permit - FINAL PERMIT Actual Date: 06/28/1986 EPA Id: CAD057468944 Facility Type: Historical - Non -Operating Unit Names: CONTAINI, TANKSTR1 Event Description: New Operating Permit- FINAL PERMIT -TERMINATION APPROVED Actual Date: 08/25/1992 EPA Id: CAD057468944 Facility Type: Historical - Non -Operating Unit Names: CONTAIN', TANKSTR1 Event Description: New Operating Permit- FINAL PERMIT -TERMINATION RECEIVED Actual Date: 05/16/1991 EPA Id: CAD057468944 Facility Type: Historical - Non -Operating Unit Names: CONTAINI, TANKSTR1 Event Description: New Operating Permit - APPLICATION PART B RECEIVED Actual Date: 04/29/1983 Closure EPA Id: CAD057468944 Facility Type: Historical - Non -Operating Unit Names: CONTAINI, TANKSTR1 Event Description: Closure Final - ISSUE CLOSURE VERIFICATION Actual Date: 06/21/1994 Alias: CAD057468944 EPA Id: CAD057468944 Facility Type: Historical - Non -Operating Alias Type: Alternate Name Alias: HUGHES AIRCRAFT EPA Id: CAD057468944 Facility Type: Historical - Non -Operating Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number Alias: 30370014 EPA Id: CAD057468944 Facility Type: Historical - Non -Operating Alias Type: Project Code (Site Code) Alias: 400223 2020 COR ACTION: EPA ID: CAD057468944 1000240988 TC3396733.2s Page 132 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO (Continued) Region: 9 Action: Remedy Constructed EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000240988 K50 HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY Global Id: LUST 0003433369 North 500 SUPERIOR AVE Contact Name: SLIC N/A 1/2-1 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 Address: UST 0.949 mi. SANTA ANA Email: Orange Co. Industrial Site 5013 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster K ENVIROSTOR Relative: LUST: Higher Region: STATE Global Id: T0605912480 Actual: Latitude: 33.630393 100 R. Longitude: -117.929305 Case Type: LUST Cleanup Site Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 08/07/1991 Lead Agency: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Case Worker: JK Local Agency: ORANGE COUNTY LOP RB Case Number: 083000821T LOC Case Number: 91 UT054 File Location: Local Agency Potential Media Affect: Soil Potential Contaminants of Concern: Diesel Site History: Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility LUST: T0605912480 Global Id: T0605912480 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 Global Id: T0605912480 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: CARL BERNHARDT Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: cbemhardt@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: 9517824495 LUST: Global Id: T0605912480 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605912480 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Reported TC3396733.2s Page 133 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY (Continued) Region: Global Id: Latitude: Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: Potential Contaminants of Concern: Site History: STATE T0605900648 33.628656487 -117.9285335 LUST Cleanup Site Open - Verification Monitoring 08/05/2009 SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) CAB ORANGE COUNTY 083000821T 90UT247 Not reported Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) * Solvents Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility LUST: T0605900648 Global Id: T0605900648 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: CARL BERNHARDT Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: cbemhardt@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: 9517824495 Global Id: T0605900648 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: LUIS A. LODRIGUEZA Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY Address: 2009 E. EDINGER AVE. City: SANTA ANA Email: Ilodrigueza@hca.co.orange.ca.us Phone Number: Not reported LUST: T0605900648 Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 11/09/2004 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 03/21/2006 Action: * Verbal Communication Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 03/17/2007 Action: * Verbal Communication Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 10/30/2004 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 0003433369 TC3396733.2s Page 134 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY (Continued) 0003433369 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 06/30/2004 Action: CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study Report Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 01/30/2004 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 04/30/2004 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 06/30/2004 Action: CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study Report Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 07/30/2004 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 03/21/2006 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 06/30/2007 Action: Other Workplan Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 11/04/2003 Action: Site Visit / Inspection / Sampling Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 06/23/2003 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 10/21/2005 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 01/22/2004 Action: ' Verbal Communication TC3396733.2s Page 135 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY (Continued) 0003433369 Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 04/16/2003 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Stopped Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 11/07/2008 Action: Monitoring Report - Semi -Annually Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 07/30/2008 Action: Monitoring Report - Semi -Annually Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 06/10/2004 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 12/12/2003 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 03/27/2009 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 03/27/2007 Action: Interim Remedial Action Plan Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 04/30/2004 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 04/08/2007 Action: Other Report / Document Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT TC3396733.2s Page 136 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY (Continued) 0003433369 Date: 10/30/2003 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 04/17/2003 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 07/17/2002 Action: Meeting Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 09/08/2003 Action: ' No Action Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 05/07/2004 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 02/23/2004 Action: Meeting Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 03/17/2005 Action: Meeting Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 10/31/2007 Action: Final Remedial Action Report / Corrective Action Report Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 03/01/2006 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 09/01/2005 Action: Monitoring Report - Semi -Annually Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 03/01/2005 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 10/21/2004 Action: Site Visit / Inspection / Sampling TC3396733.2s Page 137 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY (Continued) 0003433369 Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 04/14/2005 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 04/25/2006 Action: Site Visit / Inspection / Sampling Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 01/01/1950 Action: In Situ Biological Treatment Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 12/09/2009 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 04/02/2005 Action: Other Report / Document Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 04/01/2005 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 10/29/2009 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 02/09/2004 Action: Other Report / Document Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 06/30/2004 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 07/30/2004 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE TC3396733.2s Page 138 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY (Continued) 0003433369 Date: 06/30/2008 Action: Other Workplan Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 08/18/2005 Action: Risk Assessment Report Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 05/31/2005 Action: Other Report / Document Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 09/09/2005 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 08/30/2005 Action: CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study Report Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 09/26/2010 Action: Risk Assessment Report Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 09/26/2010 Action: Interim Remedial Action Report Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 01/30/2011 Action: Monitoring Report - Semi -Annually Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 01/24/2006 Action: Meeting Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 05/31/2006 Action: ` Verbal Communication Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Reported TC3396733.2s Page 139 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY (Continued) 0003433369 Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 07/11/2006 Action: Site Visit / Inspection / Sampling Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 08/21/2006 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 04/27/2007 Action: * Verbal Communication Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 06/18/2003 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 07/08/2008 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 09/09/2003 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 10/14/2003 Action: * No Action Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 04/09/2004 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 07/30/2004 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 09/09/2005 Action: Other Report / Document Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 12/30/2006 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE TC3396733.2s Page 140 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY (Continued) 0003433369 Date: 03/01/2007 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 02/09/2004 Action: Other Report / Document Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 02/28/2008 Action: Meeting Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 09/30/2004 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 10/31/2005 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 11/02/2006 Action: CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study Report Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 10/09/2007 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 02/29/2012 Action: Well Installation Report Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 01/31/2011 Action: Other Report / Document Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 07/30/2011 Action: Monitoring Report - Semi -Annually Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 06/12/2008 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 06/08/2008 Action: Staff Letter TC3396733.2s Page 141 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY (Continued) Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 12/07/2005 Action: Meeting Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 07/21/2003 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 09/30/2003 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 09/02/2003 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 09/11/2006 Action: Interim Remedial Action Plan Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 05/22/2006 Action: Remedial Progress Report Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 12/14/2005 Action: Meeting Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 12/20/2006 Action: Meeting Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 01/01/1950 Action: In Situ Biological Treatment Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Ex Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment (other than P&T, SVE, or Excavation) Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 07/19/2003 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan ;eimmir K 0003433369 TC3396733.2s Page 142 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY (Continued) 0003433369 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 06/11/2003 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 09/30/2003 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 09/30/2003 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 05/15/2003 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 07/30/2006 Action: Interim Remedial Action Plan Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 06/02/2006 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 07/16/2007 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 05/24/2007 Action: Verbal Enforcement Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 07/21/2007 Action: Site Visit / Inspection / Sampling Global Id: T0605900648 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 07/26/2006 Action: * Verbal Communication ORANGE CO. LUST Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 91 UT054 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Diesel fuel oil and additives, Nos.1-D, 2-D,2-4 Date Closed: 08/07/1991 Case Type: Soil Only TC3396733.2s Page 143 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY (Continued) Record ID: RO0002217 SLIC: Region: Facility Status: Status Date: Global Id: Lead Agency: Lead Agency Case Number: Latitude: Longitude: Case Type: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affected: Potential Contaminants of Concern: Site History: STATE Open - Remediation 10/01/2007 T0605930446 SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Not reported 33.628656487 -117.9285335 Cleanup Program Site CAB Not reported Not reported Not reported Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) ` Solvents Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: UST: Facility ID: 4879 Latitude: 33.63044 Longitude: -117.92923 Orange Co. Industrial Site Case ID: 931CO27 Region: ORANGE Record ID: RO0000440 Current Status: CLOSED 1/18/1994 Closure Type: Closure certification issued Released Chemical: PERCHLOROETHYLENE ENVIROSTOR: Site Type: Corrective Action Site Type Detailed: Corrective Action Acres: 0 NPL: NO Regulatory Agencies: RWQCB Lead Agency: WQC Program Manager: Not reported Supervisor: ' Unknown Division Branch: Cleanup Cypress Facility ID: 80001429 Site Code: 400223 Assembly: 74 Senate: 37 Special Program: Not reported Status: Refer: RWQCB Status Date: 01/01/2008 Restricted Use: NO Site Mgmt. Req.: NONE SPECIFIED Funding: Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 0003433369 TC3396733.2s Page 144 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY (Continued) Latitude: Longitude: APN: Past Use: Potential COC: Confirmed COC: Potential Description: Alias Name: Alias Type: Alias Name: Alias Type: Alias Name: Alias Type: Alias Name: Alias Type: Alias Name: Alias Type: 33.62947 -117.9300 NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED HUGHES AIRCRAFT Alternate Name CAD057468944 EPA Identification Number 400223 Project Code (Site Code) 30370014 Envirostor ID Number 80001429 Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: Completed Area Name: Completed Sub Area Name: Completed Document Type: Completed Date: Comments: Completed Area Name: Completed Sub Area Name: Completed Document Type: Completed Date: Comments: Completed Area Name: Completed Sub Area Name: Completed Document Type: Completed Date: Comments: Completed Area Name: Completed Sub Area Name: Completed Document Type: Completed Date: Comments: Completed Area Name: Completed Sub Area Name: Completed Document Type: Completed Date: Comments: Completed Area Name: Completed Sub Area Name: Completed Document Type: Completed Date: Comments: PROJECT WIDE Not reported Preliminary Assessment Report 06/01/1983 Not reported PROJECT WIDE Not reported Preliminary Assessment Report 03/12/1990 Not reported PROJECT WIDE Not reported Interim Measures Questionnaire 10/25/1994 Not reported PROJECT WIDE Not reported Consent Order 01/01/1985 Not reported PROJECT WIDE Not reported Unilateral Order (I/SE, RAO, CAO, EPA AO) 08/18/1983 Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 0003433369 PROJECT WIDE Not reported RCRA Facility Assessment Report 12/08/1999 THIS EVENT REFLECTS A DETERMINATION OF AN ANALOGOUS RFA AS PER A 12/8/1999 LETTER FROM EPA&DTSC (ANALOGOUS TEAM) TO RWQCB WHEREIN TWO REPORTS WERE REVIEWED AND DETERMINED TO BE ANALOGOUS TO AN RFA. THE TWO REPORTS ARE "ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS TC3396733.2s Page 145 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY (Continued) Completed Area Name: Completed Sub Area Name: Completed Document Type: Completed Date: Comments: Completed Area Name: Completed Sub Area Name: Completed Document Type: Completed Date: Comments: Completed Area Name: Completed Sub Area Name: Completed Document Type: Completed Date: Comments: Completed Area Name: Completed Sub Area Name: Completed Document Type: Completed Date: Comments: Completed Area Name: Completed Sub Area Name: Completed Document Type: Completed Date: Comments: Completed Area Name: Completed Sub Area Name: Completed Document Type: Completed Date: Comments: Completed Area Name: Completed Sub Area Name: Completed Document Type: Completed Date: Comments: Future Area Name: Future Sub Area Name: Future Document Type: Future Due Date: Schedule Area Name: Schedule Sub Area Name: Schedule Document Type: Schedule Due Date: Schedule Revised Date: PROJECT WIDE Not reported Human Exposure Controlled 03/09/2001 Not reported PROJECT WIDE Not reported Groundwater Migration Controlled 03/09/2001 Not reported PROJECT WIDE Not reported Human Exposure Controlled 12/02/1997 Not reported PROJECT WIDE Not reported Groundwater Migration Controlled 12/07/2005 Not reported PROJECT WIDE Not reported Human Exposure Controlled 09/23/2005 Not reported PROJECT WIDE Not reported " Remedy Selected 09/07/2006 Not reported PROJECT WIDE Not reported Remedy Constructed 03/25/2008 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Site Type: Historical Site Type Detailed: ' Historical Acres: Not reported NPL: NO Regulatory Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 0003433369 TC3396733.2s Page 146 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY (Continued) MAP FINDINGS Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED Program Manager: Not reported Supervisor: * Mmonroy Division Branch: Cleanup Cypress Facility ID: 30370014 Site Code: 400223 Assembly: 74 Senate: 37 Special Program: Not reported Status: Refer: RCRA Status Date: 05/10/1995 Restricted Use: NO Site Mgmt. Req.: NONE SPECIFIED Funding: Not reported Latitude: 33.6225 Longitude: -117.9391 APN: NONE SPECIFIED Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIED Confirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Description: NONE SPECIFIED Alias Name: RAYTHEON MICRO ELECTRONICS Alias Type: Alternate Name Alias Name: CAD057468944 Alias Type: EPA Identification Number Alias Name: 400223 Alias Type: Project Code (Site Code) Alias Name: 30370014 Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: * Discovery Completed Date: 12/01/1981 Comments: FACILITY IDENTIFIED EPA HAZ. MATL HANDLERS LIST. EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Site Screening Completed Date: 02/09/1995 Comments: NFA FOR SITE MITIGATION OPERATIONS, THIS IS A RCRA FACILITY. Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported 0003433369 TC3396733.2s Page 147 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site 51 NEWPORT BEACH CORP YARD North 592 SUPERIOR 1/2-1 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0.986 mi. Contact Name: 5208 ft. Organization Name: Relative: LUST: Higher Region: Action: Global Id: Actual: Latitude: 98 ft. Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: Potential Contaminants of Concern: Site History: MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number LUST 5108241203 ENVIROSTOR N/A STATE T10000001116 33.632201 -117.927131 LUST Cleanup Site Completed - Case Closed 04/28/2010 ORANGE COUNTY LOP DB ORANGE COUNTY LOP Not reported 09UT003 Local Agency Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Not reported Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: LUST: Global Id: Global Id: T10000001116 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochr .com Phone Number: 7144336255 LUST: T10000001116 Global Id: T10000001116 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 05/14/2009 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T10000001116 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 05/14/2009 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T10000001116 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Stopped Global Id: T10000001116 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 07/01/2009 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T10000001116 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT TC3396733.2s Page 148 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number NEWPORT BEACH CORP YARD (Continued) Date: 04/28/2010 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T10000001116 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T10000001116 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Reported Region: STATE Global Id: T0605912872 Latitude: 33.63104 Longitude: -117.927302 Case Type: LUST Cleanup Site Status: Open - Site Assessment Status Date: 02/21/2007 Lead Agency: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Case Worker: DB Local Agency: ORANGE COUNTY LOP RB Case Number: Not reported LOC Case Number: 06UT006 File Location: Local Agency Potential Media Affect: Soil Potential Contaminants of Concern: Diesel Site History: Please refer to recent Site Documents or Monitoring Reports in GeoTracker for site history. Orange County is not responsible for the accuracy of any professional interpretations provided in reports submitted by consultants for the responsible party. Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility LUST: T0605912872 Global Id: T0605912872 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 Global Id: T0605912872 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: CARL BERNHARDT Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: 9517824495 LUST: Global Id: T0605912872 S108241203 TC3396733.2s Page 149 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site NEWPORT BEACH CORP YARD (Continued) Action Type: Date: Action: Global Id: Action Type: Date: Action: Global Id: Action Type: Date: Action: Global Id: Action Type: Date: Action: Global Id: Action Type: Date: Action: Global Id: Action Type: Date: Action: Global Id: Action Type: Date: Action: Region: Global Id: Latitude: Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: Potential Contaminants of Concern: Site History: ENFORCEMENT 12/05/2006 Notice of Responsibility T0605912872 ENFORCEMENT 11/28/2007 Staff Letter T0605912872 Other 01/01/1950 Leak Discovery T0605912872 Other 01/01/1950 Leak Reported T0605912872 ENFORCEMENT 09/26/2008 Staff Letter T0605912872 ENFORCEMENT 05/18/2011 File review T0605912872 ENFORCEMENT 09/15/2010 File review STATE T0605902297 33.6250801 -117.9345589 LUST Cleanup Site Completed - Case Closed 12/21/1999 ORANGE COUNTY LOP JK ORANGE COUNTY LOP 083003489T 99UT036 Local Agency Soil Gasoline Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: LUST: Global Id: T0605902297 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5108241203 TC3396733.2s Page 150 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site NEWPORT BEACH CORP YARD (Continued) Organization Name: Address: City: Email: Phone Number: Global Id: Contact Type: Contact Name: Organization Name: Address: City: Email: Phone Number: LUST: Global Id: Action Type: Date: Action: Global Id: Action Type: Date: Action: Region: Global Id: Latitude: Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: Potential Contaminants of Concern: Site History: ORANGE COUNTY LOP 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 SANTA ANA dbaker@ochca.com 7144336255 T0605902297 Regional Board Caseworker VALERIE JAHN-BULL SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 RIVERSIDE vjahn-bull@waterboards.ca.gov 9517824903 T0605902297 Other 01/01/1950 Leak Discovery T0605902297 Other 01/01/1950 Leak Reported STATE T0605900088 33.6250801 -117.9345589 LUST Cleanup Site Completed - Case Closed 02/28/1991 ORANGE COUNTY LOP JK ORANGE COUNTY LOP 083000114T 86UT123 Local Agency Soil Solvents, Gasoline Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: LUST: Global Id: Contact Type: Contact Name: Organization Name: Address: City: Email: Phone Number: . 1 -nil T0605900088 Local Agency Caseworker DENAMARIE BAKER ORANGE COUNTY LOP 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 SANTA ANA dbaker@ochca.com 7144336255 IUI&141614IrI:I3 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5108241203 TC3396733.2s Page 151 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number NEWPORT BEACH CORP YARD (Continued) 5108241203 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: CARL BERNHARDT Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: 9517824495 LUST: ORANGE Global Id: T0605900088 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605900088 Action Type: Other Date: 01/01/1950 Action: Leak Reported ORANGE CO. LUST: ORANGE Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 86UT123 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Solvents Date Closed: 02/28/1991 Case Type: Soil Only Record ID: RO0001263 Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 86UT123 Current Status: Not reported Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 02/28/1991 Case Type: Not reported Record ID: RO0001263 Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 99UT036 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 12/21/1999 Case Type: Soil Only Record ID: RO0001972 Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 06UT006 Current Status: 3B Released Substance: Diesel fuel oil and additives, Nos.1-D, 2-D,2-4 Date Closed: Not reported Case Type: Undetermined Record ID: RO0003418 ENVIROSTOR: Site Type: Historical Site Type Detailed: * Historical TC3396733.2s Page 152 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site NEWPORT BEACH CORP YARD (Continued) Acres: Not reported NPL: NO Regulatory Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED Program Manager: Not reported Supervisor: . Mmonroy Division Branch: Cleanup Cypress Facility ID: 30760007 Site Code: Not reported Assembly: 74 Senate: 37 Special Program: Not reported Status: Refer: RWQCB Status Date: 05/24/1995 Restricted Use: NO Site Mgmt. Req.: NONE SPECIFIED Funding: Not reported Latitude: 33.6225 Longitude: -117.9391 APN: NONE SPECIFIED Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIED Confirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Description: NONE SPECIFIED Alias Name: CAD983567447 Alias Type: EPA Identification Number Alias Name: 30760007 Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number Completed Info EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5108241203 Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Site Screening Completed Date: 04/25/1995 Comments: RWQCB INVESTIGATING THE HUGHES SITE FOR PCE AND TCE CONTAMINATION IN GROUNDWATER. 12/06/94 FILE INDICATES ORANGE CO HEALTH CARE AGENCY Future Area Name: (OCHCA) ISSUED THE PERMIT TO OPERATE USTS. IN 1991 OCHCA REQUESTED AN Future Sub Area Name: INVESTIGATION OF A POSSIBLE UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANK THAT HAD Future Document Type: BEEN REMOVED FROM THE SITE. OCHCA CONDUCTED A REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION Future Due Date: THAT INCLUDED SUBSURFACE SAMPLING AT THE FORMER TANK AREA. SITE IS Schedule Area Name: LOCATED ADJACENT TO HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO. HUGHES IS CURRENTLY UNDER INVESTIGATION BY RWQCB. NFA FOR DTSC. Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Site Screening Completed Date: 06/29/1992 Comments: The Preliminary Assessment report was screened by R-4 staff. There are problems in the area of methane gas escaping when- ever excavation is done. The RWQCB is investigating the Hughes site for PCE and TCE contamination in groundwater. Staff recommends low priority PEA. Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported TC3396733.2s Page 153 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site NEWPORT BEACH CORP YARD (Continued) Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5108241203 TC3396733.2s Page 154 Count: 1 records. City NEWPORTBEACH ORPHAN SUMMARY EDR ID Site Name 1003878042 SOUTH BASIN OIL CO WELL #1 Site Address 204 8 206 43RD ST TC3396733.2s Page 155 Zip Database(s) 92663 CERC-NFRAP GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 05/08/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/10/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/15/2012 Number of Days to Update: 5 NPL Site Boundaries Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Sources: EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 Telephone 617-918-1143 EPA Region 3 Telephone 215-814-5418 EPA Region 4 Telephone 404-562-8033 EPA Region 5 Telephone 312-886-6686 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4246 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/15/2012 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of fled notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-5644267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC3396733.2s Page GR -1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal Delisted NPL site list DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/15/2012 Number of Days to Update: 40 Federal CERCLIS list Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 12/27/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/12/2012 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 12/10/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/16/2011 Number of Days to Update: 36 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 12/28/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/12/2012 Number of Days to Update: 14 Federal RCP -4 CORRACTS facilities list Source: EPA Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. TC3396733.2s Page GR -2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 08/19/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 132 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-TSDF: RCRA- Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 03/15/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/15/2012 Number of Days to Update: 41 Federal RCRA generators list Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 08/16/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/15/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/15/2012 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 08/16/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/15/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/15/2012 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 08/16/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/15/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/15/2012 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415)495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 08/16/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC3396733.2s Page GR -3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 12/30/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/30/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 12/30/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/30/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 11 Federal ERNS list Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 04/02/2012 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2012 Telephone: 202-267-2180 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2012 Last EDR Contact: 07/02/2012 Number of Days to Update: 72 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE: State Response Sites Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority, and high potential risk. Date of Government Version: 06/13/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2012 Number of Days to Update: 22 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCL/S Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ENVIROSTOR: EnviroStor Database The Department of Toxic Substances Control's (DTSC's) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program's (SMBRP's) EnviroStor database identifies sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Supedund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Supertund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly -contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. TC3396733.2s Page GR -4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 06/13/2012 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2012 Telephone: 916-323-3400 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2012 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2012 Number of Days to Update: 22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF (SWIS): Solid Waste Information System Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills. SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills. These may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 05/21/2012 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/22/2012 Telephone: 916-341-6320 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2012 Last EDR Contact: 08/20/2012 Number of Days to Update: 30 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report Orange, Riverside, San Diego counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2001 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2001 Telephone: 858-637-5595 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2001 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2011 Number of Days to Update: 28 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Imperial, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara counties. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2004 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2004 Telephone: 760-776-8943 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2004 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Mono, San Bernardino counties. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2005 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office (6) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2005 Telephone: 760-241-7365 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2005 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Number of Days to Update: 22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/09/2003 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2003 Telephone: 530-542-5572 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2003 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Calveras, EI Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumes, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, Yuba counties. TC3396733.2s Page GR -5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 07/01/2008 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2008 Telephone: 916-4644834 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Number of Days to Update: 9 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Telephone: 213-576-6710 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011 Number of Days to Update: 35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz counties. Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2003 Telephone: 805-5424786 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2003 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Number of Days to Update: 14 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma counties. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Telephone: 510-622-2433 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Number of Days to Update: 30 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Trinity counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2001 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast (1) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2001 Telephone: 707-570-3769 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2001 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Number of Days to Update: 29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST: Geotracker's Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state. For more information on a particular leaking underground storage tank sites, please contact the appropriate regulatory agency. Date of Government Version: 06/14/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2012 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: see region list Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8). For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. TC3396733.2s Page GR -6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005 Telephone: 909-7824496 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2005 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Number of Days to Update: 41 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC: Statewide SLIC Cases The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 06/14/2012 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2012 Telephone: 866-480-1028 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2012 Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2012 Number of Days to Update: 7 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2003 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (1) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2003 Telephone: 707-576-2220 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/25/2003 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Number of Days to Update: 18 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Telephone: 510-286-0457 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Number of Days to Update: 30 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SLIC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2006 Telephone: 805-549-3147 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2006 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Number of Days to Update: 28 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/17/2004 Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2004 Telephone: 213-576-6600 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Number of Days to Update: 47 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC REG 5: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. TC3396733.2s Page GR -7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/01/2005 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2005 Telephone: 916-464-3291 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Number of Days to Update: 16 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2005 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorville Branch Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2005 Telephone: 619-241-6583 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/16/2005 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Number of Days to Update: 22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sites The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Telephone: 530-542-5574 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Number of Days to Update: 35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 7: SLIC List The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2004 Source: California Regional Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2004 Telephone: 760-346-7491 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Number of Days to Update: 36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 8: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2008 Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2008 Telephone: 951-782-3298 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2008 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Number of Days to Update: 11 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually SLIC REG 9: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2007 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2007 Telephone: 858-467-2980 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2007 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2011 Number of Days to Update: 17 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2011 Data Release Frequency: Annually INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTS on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. TC3396733.2s Page GR -8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 05/07/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 04/12/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTS on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 08/18/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTS on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 09/12/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/13/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2011 Number of Days to Update: 59 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTS on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 12/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/15/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 05/25/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/16/2012 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 02/07/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/17/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/15/2012 Number of Days to Update: 88 State and tribal registered storage tank lists Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC3396733.2s Page GR -9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UST: Active UST Facilities Active UST facilities gathered from the local regulatory agencies Date of Government Version: 07/19/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/06/2012 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: SWRCB Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/01/2009 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-327-5092 Last EDR Contact: 07/03/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 05/07/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/16/2012 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 11/28/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 08/18/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/07/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/17/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/15/2012 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). TC3396733.2s Page GR -10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 05/10/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2011 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/28/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/29/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/15/2012 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 12/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/15/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/12/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/02/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/16/2012 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 55 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07120/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC's costs. TC3396733.2s Page GR -11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 06/13/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2012 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 02/17/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/15/2012 Number of Days to Update: 42 Local Brownfield lists Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 07/02/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies US BROWNFIELD& A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served. by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 06/27/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/27/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 06/25/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Local Lists of Landfill/ Solid Waste Disposal Sites ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 07/03/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. WMUDS is composed of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15) Information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information, and Interested Parties Information. TC3396733.2s Page GR -12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/01/2000 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2000 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2000 Number of Days to Update: 30 SWRCY: Recycler Database A listing of recycling facilities in California. Date of Government Version: 06/11/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2012 Number of Days to Update: 22 HAULERS: Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing A listing of registered waste tire haulers. Date of Government Version: 05/10/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/10/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2012 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-2274448 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Source: Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6422 Last EDR Contact: 08/14/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ('the Department') provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 03/16/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/12/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/16/2012 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST CAL -SITES: Calsites Database The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2006 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC3396733.2s Page GR -13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SCH: School Property Evaluation Program This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose. Date of Government Version: 06/13/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2012 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact:. 08/07/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. Date of Government Version: 07/01/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/26/1995 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4364 Last EDR Contact:. 01/26/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of drug lab locations. Listing of a location in this database does not indicate that any illegal drug lab materials were or were not present there, and does not constitute a determination that the location either requires or does not require additional cleanup work. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/14/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/21/2012 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-6504 Last EDR Contact: 08/06/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ('the Department') provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most rases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 09/01/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/2009 Number of Days to Update: 131 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database The Facility Inventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/31/1994 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/1995 Telephone: 916-341-5851 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/1995 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/1998 Number of Days to Update: 24 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST MENDOCINO: Mendocino County UST Database A listing of underground storage tank locations in Mendocino County. TC3396733.2s Page GR -14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 09/23/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/23/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/01/2009 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 707-4634466 Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1990 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/1991 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/1991 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2001 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SWEEPS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990's. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. Date of Government Version: 06/01/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2005 Number of Days to Update: 35 Local Land Records Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2005 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA ('Superfund') lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 02/16/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/26/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2012 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/11/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies LIENS: Environmental Liens Listing A listing of property locations with environmental liens for California where DTSC is a lien holder. Date of Government Version: 03/12/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/13/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/02/2012 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 06/25/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC3396733.2s Page GR -15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING DEED: Deed. Restriction Listing Site Mitigation and Brownfelds Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions 8 Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restriction. The DTSC Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program's oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents deed restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple deed restrictions. The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder's office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners. Date of Government Version: 06/11/2012 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/12/2012 Telephone: 916-323-3400 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2012 Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2012 Number of Days to Update: 24 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2012 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 07/02/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (accidental releases or spills). Date of Government Version: 03/28/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2012 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Office of Emergency Services Telephone: 916-845-8400 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies LDS: Land Disposal Sites Listing The Land Disposal program regulates of waste discharge to land for treatment, storage and disposal in waste management units. Date of Government Version: 06/14/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2012 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: State Water Qualilty Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MCS: Military Cleanup Sites Listing The State Water Resources Control Board and nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards partner with the Department of Defense (DoD) through the Defense and State Memorandum of Agreement (DSMOA) to oversee the investigation and remediation of water quality issues at military facilities. Date of Government Version: 06/14/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2012 Number of Days to Update: 22 Other Ascertainable Records Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC3396733.2s Page GR -16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RCRA-NonGen: RCRA- Non Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 03/15/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/15/2012 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 08/16/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 07/29/2011 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2011 Telephone: 202-366-4595 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2011 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2012 Number of Days to Update: 94 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 112 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2011 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/2012 Telephone: Varies Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2012 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2012 Number of Days to Update: 36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 02/27/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2012 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC3396733.2s Page GR -17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand -like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 09/14/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 146 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 08/18/2011 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2011 Telephone: 303-231-5959 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011 Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2012 Number of Days to Update: 21 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 131 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2012 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Telephone: 202-566-1667 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact: 08/22/2012 Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/10/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRAITSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/22/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/10/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC3396733.2s Page GR -18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRAfTSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide -producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1 st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 07/20/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-5088 Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 11/01/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/16/2011 Number of Days to Update: 98 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC3396733.2s Page GR -19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING MILTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 06/21/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/15/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 60 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 01/10/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/12/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C -DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 10/23/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/13/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: EPA Telephone: (415) 947-8000 Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2011 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2012 Data Release Frequency: Biennially TC3396733.2s Page GR -20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. Date of Government Version: 01/01/1989 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/1994 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-255-2118 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NPDES: NPDES Permits Listing A listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater. Date of Government Version: 05/21/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/22/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2012 Number of Days to Update: 30 UIC: UIC Listing A listing of underground control injection wells. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/29/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/04/2012 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 08/20/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Source: Deaprtment of Conservation Telephone: 916-445-2408 Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies WDS: Waste Discharge System Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements. Date of Government Version: 06/19/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2007 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5227 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CORTESE: "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal -Sites). Date of Government Version: 04/02/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2012 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 07/02/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST CORTESE: Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWFILS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. TC3396733.2s Page GR -21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/21/1993 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/01/1993 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/1993 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-3846 Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DRYCLEANERS: Cleaner Facilities A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaner's agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants, except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. Date of Government Version: 01/19/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/21/2012 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-327-4498 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually WIP: Well Investigation Program Case List Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area. Date of Government Version: 07/03/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2009 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board Telephone: 213-576-6726 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies ENF: Enforcement Action Listing A listing of Water Board Enforcement Actions. Formal is everything except Oral/Verbal Communication, Notice of Violation, Expedited Payment Letter, and Staff Enforcement Letter. Date of Government Version: 08/15/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/23/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2011 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: State Water Resoruces Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 08/14/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies HAZNET: Facility and Manifest Data Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2012 Telephone: 916-255-1136 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2012 Last EDR Contact: 07/16/2012 Number of Days to Update: 14 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually EMI: Emissions Inventory Data Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/18/2010 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: California Air Resources Board Telephone: 916-322-2990 Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. TC3396733.2s Page GR -22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2011 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 02/27/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/15/2012 Number of Days to Update: 41 EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 07/02/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 03/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/17/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2012 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2012 Data Release Frequency: N/A 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. TC3396733.2s Page GR -23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 11/11/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2012 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-3084044 Last EDR Contact: 08/16/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies FINANCIAL ASSURANCE 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial Assurance information Date of Government Version: 03/01/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2007 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-3628 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies FINANCIAL ASSURANCE 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 05/23/2012 Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/24/2012 Telephone: 916-341-6066 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2012 Last EDR Contact: 08/14/2012 Number of Days to Update: 43 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies HWP: EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. Date of Government Version: 05/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/01/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2012 Number of Days to Update: 60 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HWT: Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC. A hazardous waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number. Date of Government Version: 04/11/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/12/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/08/2012 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-440-7145 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 08/17/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/21/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH DOE: Sleam-Electric Plan Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 07/16/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC3396733.2s Page GR -24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING MWMP: Medical Waste Management Program Listing The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste by permitting and inspecting medical waste Offsite Treatment Facilities (PDF) and Transfer Stations (PDF) throughout the state. MWMP also oversees all Medical Waste Transporters. Date of Government Version: 06/01/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/12/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2012 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-558-1784 Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post -closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2012 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 08/14/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 83 PROC: Certified Processors Database A listing of certified processors. Date of Government Version: 06/11/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2012 Number of Days to Update: 22 EDR Proprietary Records Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Manufactured Gas Plants: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR Historical Auto Stations: EDR Proprietary Historic Gas Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. TC3396733.2s Page GR -25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR Historical Cleaners: EDR Proprietary Historic Dry Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: NIA Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A COUNTY RECORDS ALAMEDA COUNTY: Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies Contaminated Sites A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program (oil and groundwater contamination from chemical releases and spills) and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program (soil and ground water contamination from leaking petroleum USTs). Date of Government Version: 04/03/2012 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2012 Telephone: 510-567-6700 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/08/2012 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2012 Number of Days to Update: 34 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Underground Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2012 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2012 Telephone: 510-567-6700 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/08/2012 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2012 Number of Days to Update: 34 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: Site List List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs. Date of Government Version: 06/13/2012 Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2012 Telephone: 925-646-2286 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2012 Last EDR Contact: 08/06/2012 Number of Days to Update: 22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually KERN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing. TC3396733.2s Page GR -26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 08/31/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/01/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2010 Number of Days to Update: 29 LOS ANGELES COUNTY: Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department Telephone: 661-862-8700 Last EDR Contact: 08/16/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly San Gabriel Valley Areas of Concern San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2009 Number of Days to Update: 206 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3178 Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HMS: Street Number List Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2012 Number of Days to Update: 23 List of Solid Waste Facilities Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County. Date of Government Version: 04/23/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2012 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Department of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-3517 Last EDR Contact: 07/16/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Source: La County Department of Public Works Telephone: 818-458-5185 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies City of Los Angeles Landfills Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 03/05/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Engineering & Construction Division Telephone: 213-473-7869 Last EDR Contact: 08/14/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies Site Mitigation List Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint. Date of Government Version: 12/29/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/21/2012 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: Community Health Services Telephone: 323-890-7806 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually City of EI Segundo Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in EI Segundo city. Date of Government Version: 04/26/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/24/2012 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: City of EI Segundo Fire Department Telephone: 310-524-2236 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually TC3396733.2s Page GR -27 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/23/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/26/2003 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department Telephone: 562-570-2563 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance. Date of Government Version: 07/12/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/23/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/2012 Number of Days to Update: 10 MARIN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites Currently permitted USTs in Marin County. Date of Government Version: 05/22/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2012 Number of Days to Update: 38 NAPA COUNTY: Source: City of Torrance Fire Department Telephone: 310-618-2973 Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Source: Public Works Department Waste Management Telephone: 415-499-6647 Last EDR Contact: 07/23/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Sites With Reported Contamination A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 12/05/2011 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/06/2011 Telephone: 707-253-4269 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/07/2012 Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2012 Number of Days to Update: 63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 01/15/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/16/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2008 Number of Days to Update: 23 ORANGE COUNTY: List of Industrial Site Cleanups Petroleum and non -petroleum spills. Date of Government Version: 05/01/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/17/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2012 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 12/05/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC3396733.2s Page GR -28 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST). Date of Government Version: 05/01/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2012 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST). Date of Government Version: 05/01/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/17/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/24/2012 Number of Days to Update: 7 PLACER COUNTY: Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Master List of Facilities List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites. Date of Government Version: 06/12/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2012 Number of Days to Update: 23 RIVERSIDE COUNTY: Source: Placer County Health and Human Services Telephone: 530-889-7312 Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 04/23/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2012 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 06/25/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tank Tank List Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county. Date of Government Version: 07/18/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/06/2012 Number of Days to Update: 18 SACRAMENTO COUNTY: Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 06/25/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Toxic Site Clean -Up List List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred. Date of Government Version: 02/07/2012 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2012 Telephone: 916-875-8406 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/08/2012 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2012 Number of Days to Update: 22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC3396733.2s Page GR -29 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Any business that has hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators. Date of Government Version: 02/02/2012 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2012 Telephone: 916-875-8406 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/08/2012 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2012 Number of Days to Update: 21 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: Hazardous Material Permits This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers. Date of Government Version: 05/30/2012 Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/31/2012 Telephone: 909-387-3041 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2012 Last EDR Contact: 08/13/2012 Number of Days to Update: 36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN DIEGO COUNTY: Hazardous Materials Management Division Database The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment 'H' permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non -tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination are included.) Date of Government Version: 09/09/2010 Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2010 Telephone: 619-338-2268 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2010 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2012 Number of Days to Update: 14 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Solid Waste Facilities San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/31/2011 Source: Department of Health Services Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/04/2011 Telephone: 619-338-2209 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/13/2011 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2012 Number of Days to Update: 39 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies Environmental Case Listing The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2010 Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2010 Telephone: 619-338-2371 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2010 Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2012 Number of Days to Update: 24 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY: TC3396733.2s Page GR -30 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Local Oversite Facilities A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 09/19/2008 Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2008 Telephone: 415-252-3920 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2008 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2012 Number of Days to Update: 10 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tank Information Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 11/29/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/15/2011 Number of Days to Update: 5 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly San Joaquin Co. UST A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county. Date of Government Version: 06/25/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/27/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2012 Number of Days to Update: 34 SAN MATEO COUNTY: Source: Environmental Health Department Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Business Inventory List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2012 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/09/2012 Telephone: 650-363-1921 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/08/2012 Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2012 Number of Days to Update: 29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually Fuel Leak List A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county. Date of Government Version: 06/19/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2012 Number of Days to Update: 16 SANTA CLARA COUNTY: Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 06/18/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county. Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District Telephone: 408-265-2600 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC3396733.2s Page GR -31 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LOP Listing A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2012 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-3417 Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually Hazardous Material Facilities Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites. Date of Government Version: 05/15/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/15/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2012 Number of Days to Update: 10 SOLANO COUNTY: Source: City of San Jose Fire Department Telephone: 408-535-7694 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually Leaking Underground Storage Tanks A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 06/18/2012 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2012 Telephone: 707-784-6770 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2012 Last EDR Contact: 06/15/2012 Number of Days to Update: 15 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 06/18/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2012 Number of Days to Update: 14 SONOMA COUNTY: Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 06/15/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county. Date of Government Version: 03/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/29/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2012 Number of Days to Update: 41 SUTTER COUNTY: Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 707-565-6565 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county. Date of Government Version: 06/11/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/12/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2012 Number of Days to Update: 24 LTJ :1 kjIIP1Y_<KpDIZIrip Source: Sutter County Department of Agriculture Telephone: 530-822-7500 Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually TC3396733.2s Page GR -32 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (B), Waste Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank (T) information. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2012 Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2012 Telephone: 805-654-2813 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2012 Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2012 Number of Days to Update: 42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2012 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 07/03/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 05/29/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 08/14/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Medical Waste Program List To protect public health and safety and the environment from potential exposure to disease causing agents, the Environmental Health Division Medical Waste Program regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment and disposal of medical waste throughout the County. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2012 Source: Ventura County Resource Management Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2012 Telephone: 805-654-2813 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2012 Last EDR Contact: 07/30/2012 Number of Days to Update: 21 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Tank Closed Sites List Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List. Date of Government Version: 06/27/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/29/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2012 Number of Days to Update: 32 YOLO COUNTY: Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county. Date of Government Version: 06/29/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/09/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/2012 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Yolo County Department of Health Telephone: 530-666-8646 Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC3396733.2s Page GR -33 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a ad facility. Date of Government Version: 05/21/2012 Source: Department of Energy 8 Environmental Protection Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/22/2012 Telephone: 860-424-3375 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/31/2012 Last EDR Contact: 08/20/2012 Number of Days to Update: 9 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2010 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/20/2011 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2011 Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2012 Number of Days to Update: 22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 05/01/2012 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2012 Telephone: 518-402-8651 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2012 Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2012 Number of Days to Update: 36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/05/2012 Number of Days to Update: 39 RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Source: Department of Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2012 Telephone: 401-222-2797 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2012 Last EDR Contact: 08/23/2012 Number of Days to Update: 39 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/10/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/15/2011 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Department of Natural Resource: Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/16/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC3396733.2s Page GR -34 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Oil/Gas Pipelines: This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs from 1:100,000 -Scale Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category including some oil, but primarily gas pipelines. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: Rextag Strategies Corp. Telephone: (281) 769-2247 U.S. Electric Transmission and Power Plants Systems Digital GIS Data Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities Source: Department of Social Services Telephone: 916-657-4041 Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100 -year and 500 -year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002 and 2005 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Scanned Digital USGS 7.5' Topographic Map (DRG) Source: United States Geologic Survey A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection. TC3396733.2s Page GR -35 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC3396733.2s Page GR -36 GEOCHECK "- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS PROPOSED TOWNHOMES 3303 VIA LIDO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator: UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Elevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Target Property Map: Most Recent Revision: North Map: Most Recent Revision: 33.6167 - 33° 37' 0.12" 117.9273 - 117' 5638.28" Zone 11 413979.8 3719850.0 7 ft. above sea level 33117-E8 NEWPORT BEACH OE S, CA 1981 33117-F8 NEWPORT BEACH (DIGITAL), CA 0 EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components: 1. Groundwater flow direction, and 2. Groundwater flow velocity. Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the geologic strata. TC3396733.2s Page A-1 GEOCHEM, - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. TARGETPROPERTYTOPOGRAPHY General Topographic Gradient: General NE SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES c 0 m w \tTt1 West Target Property Elevation: 7 ft. South TP TP 0 1/2 1 Miles Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. TC3396733.2s Page A-2 GEOCHECIa - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways and bodies of water). FEMA FLOOD ZONE Target Property County ORANGE, CA Flood Plain Panel at Target Property: Additional Panels in search area: NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Quad at Target Property NEWPORT BEACH HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION FEMA Flood Electronic Data YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map 06059C - FEMA DFIRM Flood data Not Reported NWI Electronic Data Coverage YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. Site -Specific Hydrogeological Data' Search Radius: 1.25 miles Location Relative to TP: 112 -1 Mile North Site Name: HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO Site EPA ID Number: CAD057468944 Groundwater Flow Direction: GENERALLY SE IN THE ALLUVIAL ZONE AT AN APPROXIMATE RATE OF 250 TO 1,000 FEET PER YEAR AND GENERALLY SE IN THE MONTEREY FORMATION AT AN APPROXIMATE RATE OF 2 TO 25 FEET PER YEAR. Measured Depth to Water: 33 to 45 feet in the alluvial zone and 48 to 57 feet in the Monterey formation. Hydraulic Connection: The shallow alluvial zone is considered a perched aquifer that overlies the silty clay Monterey formation. Sole Source Aquifer: No information about a sole source aquifer is available Data Quality: Information based on site-specific subsurface investigations is documented in the CERCLIS investigation report(s) AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW '019%Sita-spsaild hytlmgedagical dam galFartl by CERCLIS Marts. Inc.. Bainbritlga laleM. WA. AlrigM16rmewad All&Me ink,matiun mM opininns preadra i are Mos, "a ciletl EPA ne,d ). which were complaled under e CampaM1a,wiv, Enaimnmantal Reepanee Comperuaticn and Liability Inkualion System (CERCLIS) i—agatian. TC3396733.2s Page A-3 GEOCHECW' - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY For additional site information, refer to Physical Setting Source Map Findings TC3396733.2s Page A-4 LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW 1 0 - 1/8 Mile South Not Reported 4 1/8 - 1/4 Mile WNW NE A5 1/8 - 1/4 Mile SW S A6 1/8 -1/4 Mile SW S A7 1/8 - 1/4 Mile SSW Not Reported 8 1/4 -1/2 Mile NE SW 9 1/2-1 Mile NNW S 10 1/2 - 1 Mile SSE Varies 11 1/2 - 1 Mile North SSE For additional site information, refer to Physical Setting Source Map Findings TC3396733.2s Page A-4 GEOCHECK'- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes move more quickly through sandy -gravelly types of soils than silty -clayey types of soils. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed at which contaminant migration may be occurring. ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Era: Cenozoic Category: Stratifed Sequence System: Quaternary Series: Quaternary Code: Q (decoded above as Era, System & Series) Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). TC3396733.2s Page A-5 SSURGO SOIL MAP -3396733.2s SSURGO Soil Water SITE NAME: Proposed Townhomes CLIENT: PSI, Inc. ADDRESS: 3303 Via Lido CONTACT: Eric Fraske Newport Beach CA 92663 INQUIRY #: 3396733.2s LAT/LONG: 33.61671117.9273 DATE: August 23, 2012 2:36 pm C.Dvnoht C 2012 EOR. Inn G 2010 Tale Atles Rel. 0712009. GEOCHECK'- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. Soil Map ID: 1 Soil Component Name: BEACHES Soil Surface Texture: sand Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Soil Drainage Class: Poorly drained Hydric Status: All hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 92 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro m/sec (pH) 1 0 inches 5 inches sand Not reported Not reported Max: 141 Max: 7.8 Min: 42 Min: 5.1 2 5 inches 59 inches coarse sand Not reported Not reported Max: 141 Max: 7.8 Min: 42 Min: 5.1 Soil Map ID: 2 Soil Component Name: Water Soil Surface Texture: sand Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Soil Drainage Class: Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Not Reported Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches No Layer Information available. TC3396733.2s Page A-7 GEOCHECK'- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles) Federal USGS 1.000 Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 1 mile State Database 1.000 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP No Wells Found FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP 3 CA3900831 1/8 - 1/4 Mile NNW Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP No Wells Found STATE OIL/GAS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP 1 CAOG80000004673 1/8 -1/4 Mile WSW A2 CAOG80000004682 1/8- 1/4 Mile NNW A3 CAOG80000004681 1/8- 1/4 Mile NW B4 CAOG80000004675 1/8-1/4 Mile WNW A5 CAOG80000004687 1/8-1/4 Mile NW C6 CAOG80000004680 1/4-1/2 Mile NW B7 CAOG80000004678 1/4- 1/2 Mile WNW C8 CAOG80000004685 1/4-1/2 Mile NW C9 CAOG80000004683 1/4-1/2 Mile WNW C10 CAOG80000004684 1/4-1/2 Mile NW C11 CAOG80000004679 1/4-1/2 Mile WNW D12 CAOG80000004674 1/4-1/2 Mile WNW D13 CAOG80000004677 1/4-1/2 Mile WNW E14 CAOG80000004699 1/4-1/2 Mile NW TC3396733.2s Page A-8 GEOCHECK'- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY STATE OIL/GAS WELL INFORMATION TC3396733.2s Page A-9 LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP E15 CAOG80000004702 1/4-1/2 Mile NW 16 CAOG80000004688 1/4-1/2 Mile ENE E17 CAOG80000004700 1/4- 1/2 Mile NW E18 CAOG80000004708 1/4-1/2 Mile NW F19 CAOG80000004706 1/2-1 Mile NW G20 CAOG80000004690 1/2-1 Mile ENE F21 CAOG80000004704 1/2-1 Mile NW G22 CAOG80000004697 1/2 -1 Mile ENE H23 CAOG80000004713 1/2-1 Mile NW G24 CAOG80000004691 1/2-1 Mile ENE H25 CAOG80000004714 1/2-1 Mile NW 126 CAOG80000004689 1/2-1 Mile WNW 127 CAOG80000004694 1/2-1 Mile WNW J28 CAOG80000004709 1/2-1 Mile NE 129 CAOG80000004696 1/2- 1 Mile WNW 130 CAOG80000004698 1/2-1 Mile WNW J31 CAOG80000004705 1/2-1 Mile ENE K32 CAOG80000004710 1/2- 1 Mile NW K33 CAOG80000004707 1/2-1 Mile NW 134 CAOGB0000004695 1/2- 1 Mile WNW 35 CAOG80000004716 1/2-1 Mile NW 36 CAOGB0000004693 1/2 -1 Mile ENE 37 CAOG80000004750 1/2-1 Mile NNW 38 CAOG80000004777 1/2-1 Mile North 39 CAOG80000004759 1/2-1 Mile NNW L40 CAOG80000004715 1/2-1 Mile NW L41 CAOG80000004717 1/2-1 Mile NW 42 CAOG80000004779 1/2-1 Mile NNW 43 CAOG80000004712 1/2-1 Mile ENE 44 CAOG80000004743 1/2-1 Mile NW TC3396733.2s Page A-9 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP -3396733.2s NCounty Boundary N Major Roads // Contour Lines Earthquake Fault Lines aC Airports OO Earthquake epicenter, Richter 6 or greater ® Water Wells © Public Water Supply Wells • Cluster of Multiple Icons 0 114 112 1 Miles } Groundwater Flow Direction c Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location c v Groundwater Flow Varies at Location ® Closest Hydrogeological Data • Oil, gas or related wells SITE NAME: Proposed Townhomes CLIENT: PSI, Inc. ADDRESS: 3303 Via Lido CONTACT: Eric Fraske Newport Beach CA 92663 INQUIRY #: 3396733.2s LAT/LONG: 33.61671117.9273 DATE: August 23, 2012 2:36 pm C.Dvnoht C 2012 EOR. Inn G 2010 Tale Atlas Rel. 07no3g. GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Database EDR ID Number 1 Site ID: 083001822T South Groundwater Flow: Not Reported AQUIFLOW 38621 0 - 1/8 Mile Higher Shallow Water Depth: 3.5 ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Deep Water Depth: 7.5 Population Served: Average Water Depth: Not Reported 173 Date: 02/18/1993 2 Site ID: 083000449T West Groundwater Flow: Not Reported AQUIFLOW 50954 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher Shallow Water Depth: 4.23 Private Deep Water Depth: 6.06 Average Water Depth: Not Reported WELL #1 (DESTROYED) Date: 03/1991 3 Well Treatment process: NNW Treatment objective: FRDS PWS CA3900831 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher Pwsid: CA3900831 Epa region: 09 State: CA County: Not Reported Pws name: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Population Served: 340 Pwssvcconn: 173 PWS Source: Groundwater Pws type: CWS Status: Active Owner type: Private Facility id: 1 Facility name: WELL #1 (DESTROYED) Facility type: Well Treatment process: activated carbon, granular Treatment objective: organics removal Contact name: Office Original name: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Contact phone: Not Reported Contact addresst: 871 38TH AVE Contact address2: Not Reported Contact city: SANTA CRUZ Contact zip: 95062 Facility id: 11 Facility name: BETWEEN GAC FILTERS Facility type: Treatment_ plant Treatment process: activated carbon, granular Treatment objective: organics removal Facility id: 2 Facility name: WELL #3 (DESTROYED) Facility type: Well Treatment process: activated carbon, granular Treatment objective: organics removal Facility id: 7 Facility name: WELL#4(MAIN) Facility type: Well Treatment process: activated carbon, granular Treatment objective: organics removal TC3396733.2s Page A-11 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Facility id: 8 CA3900831 Pwsname: Facility name: STANDBY WELL - ABANDONED Retpops"d: 340 Pwstypecod: Facility type: Well Treatment process: activated carbon, granular Treatment objective: organics removal Complperbe: Facility id: CA3900831 001 Complperen: 1/16/20020:00:00 Enfdate: Facility name: WELL #1 (DESTROYED) State Violation/Reminder Notice Facility type: Well Treatment process: activated carbon, granular Treatment objective: organics removal Facility id: CA3900831002 Facility name: WELL #3 (DESTROYED) Facility type: Well Treatment process: activated carbon, granular Treatment objective: organics removal Facility id: CA3900831007 Facility name: WELL#4(MAIN) Facility type: Well Treatment process: activated carbon, granular Treatment objective: organics removal Facility id: CA3900831008 Facility name: STANDBY WELL - ABANDONED Facility type: Well Treatment process: activated carbon, granular Treatment objective: organics removal Facility id: CA3900831011 Facility name: BETWEEN GAC FILTERS Facility type: Treatment_ plant Treatment process: activated carbon, granular Treatment objective: organics removal PWS ID: CA3900831 Date Initiated: Not Reported Date Deactivated: Not Reported PWS Name: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK IRVINE, CA 92714 Addressee / Facility: System Owner/Responsible Party NEWPORT PACIFIC CAPITAL 369 SAN MIGUEL NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 Facility Latitude: 33 37 08 Facility Longitude: 117 55 41 City Served: Not Reported Treatment Class: Untreated Population: 340 Violations information not reported ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: Truedate: 03/31/2009 Pwsid: CA3900831 Pwsname: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Retpops"d: 340 Pwstypecod: C Vioid: 0200002 Contaminant: LEAD & COPPER RULE Viol. Type: Initial Tap Sampling for Pb and Cu Complperbe: 4/1./2000 0:00:00 Complperen: 1/16/20020:00:00 Enfdate: 1/16/20020:00:00 Enf action: State Violation/Reminder Notice Violmeasur: Not Reported TC3396733.2s Page A-12 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Truedate: 03/31/2009 Pwsid: CA3900831 Pwsname: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Retpopsrvd: 340 Pwstypecod: C Vioid: 0200002 Contaminant: LEAD & COPPER RULE Viol. Type: Initial Tap Sampling for Pb and Cu Complperbe: 4/1/2000 0:00:00 Complperen: 1/16/20020:00:00 Enfdate: 1/16/20020:00:00 Enf action: State Compliance Achieved Violmeasur: Not Reported Truedate: 03/31/2009 Pwsid: CA3900831 Pwsname: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Retpopsrvd: 340 Pwstypecod: C Vioid: 0200003 Contaminant: 7000 Viol. Type: CCR Complete Failure to Report Complperbe: 7/1/2002 0:00:00 Complperen: 7/1./20020:00:00 Enfdate: 7/1/20020:00:00 Enf action: State Compliance Achieved Violmeasur: Not Reported Truedate: 03/31/2009 Pwsid: CA3900831 Pwsname: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Retpopsrvd: 340 Pwstypecod: C Vioid: 0500004 Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR) Viol. Type: MCL, Monthly (TCR) Complperbe: 11/1/2004 0:00:00 Complperen: 11/30/20040:00:00 Enfdate: 11/1/20040:00:00 Enf action: State Public Notif Received Violmeasur: Not Reported Truedate: 03/31/2009 Pwsid: CA3900831 Pwsname: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Retpopsrvd: 340 Pwstypecod: C Vioid: 0600005 Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR) Viol. Type: MCL, Monthly (TCR) Complperbe: 11/1/2005 0:00:00 Complperen: 11/30/20050:00:00 Enfdate: 11/1/20050:00:00 Enf action: State Public Notif Received Violmeasur: Not Reported Truedate: 03/31/2009 Pwsid: CA3900831 Pwsname: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Retpopsrvd: 340 Pwstypecod: C Vioid: 0700006 Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR) Viol. Type: Monitoring, Routine Major (TCR) Complperbe: 2/1/2007 0:00:00 Complperen: 2/26/20070:00:00 Enfdate: 2/1/20070:00:00 Enf action: State Public Notif Requested Violmeasur: Not Reported Truedate: 03/31/2009 Pwsid: CA3900831 Pwsname: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Retpopsrvd: 340 Pwstypecod: C Vioid: 95V0001 Contaminant: LEAD & COPPER RULE Viol. Type: Initial Tap Sampling for Pb and Cu Complperbe: 7/1/1993 0:00:00 Complperen: 4/4/2000 0:00:00 Enfdate: 4/4/2000 0:00:00 Enf action: State Compliance Achieved Violmeasur: 0 TC3396733.2s Page A-13 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: System Name: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Violation Type: Initial Tap Sampling for Pb and Cu Contaminant: LEAD & COPPER RULE Compliance Period: 4/1/2000 0:00:00 - 12/31/2025 0:00:00 Violation ID: 0200001 Enforcement Date: 1/16/2002 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice System Name: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Violation Type: Initial Tap Sampling for Pb and Cu Contaminant: LEAD & COPPER RULE Compliance Period: 04/01/00 - 12/31/25 Violation ID: 0200001 Enforcement Date: 01/16/02 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice System Name: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Violation Type: CCR Complete Failure to Report Contaminant: 7000 Compliance Period: 7/1./2002 0:00:00 - 12/31/2025 0:00:00 Violation ID: 0200003 Enforcement Date: No Enf Action as of Enf. Action: 10/17/2006 0:00:00 System Name: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Violation Type: CCR Complete Failure to Report Contaminant: 7000 Compliance Period: 7/1/2002 0:00:00 - 12/31/2025 0:00:00 Violation ID: 0200003 Enforcement Date: 4/12/2007 0:00:00 Enf. Action: Not Reported System Name: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Violation Type: MCL, Monthly (TCR) Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR) Compliance Period: 11/1/2004 0:00:00 - 11/30/2004 0:00:00 Violation ID: 0500004 Enforcement Date: 11/1/2004 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Received System Name: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Violation Type: MCL, Monthly (TCR) Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR) Compliance Period: 11/01/04 - 11/30/04 Violation ID: 0500004 Enforcement Date: 11/01/04 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Received System Name: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Violation Type: MCL, Monthly (TCR) Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR) Compliance Period: 11/01/05- 11/30/05 Violation ID: 0600005 Enforcement Date: 11/01/05 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Received System Name: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Violation Type: MCL, Monthly (TCR) Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR) Compliance Period: 11/1/2005 0:00:00 - 11/30/2005 0:00:00 Violation ID: 0600005 Enforcement Date: 11/1/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Received System Name: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Violation Type: Initial Tap Sampling for Pb and Cu Contaminant: LEAD & COPPER RULE Compliance Period: 1993-07-01 - 2000-04-04 Violation ID: 95V0001 Enforcement Date: 2000-04-04 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved TC3396733.2s Page A-14 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: System Name: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Violation Type: Initial Tap Sampling for Pb and Cu Contaminant: LEAD & COPPER RULE Compliance Period: 1993-07-01 - 2000-04-04 Violation ID: 95V0001 Enforcement Date: 2000-04-04 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved System Name: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Violation Type: Initial Tap Sampling for Pb and Cu Contaminant: LEAD & COPPER RULE Compliance Period: 7/1/1993 0:00:00 - 4/4/2000 0:00:00 Violation ID: 95V0001 Enforcement Date: 4/4/2000 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved System Name: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Violation Type: Initial Tap Sampling for Pb and Cu Contaminant: LEAD & COPPER RULE Compliance Period: 07/01/93 - 04/04/00 Violation ID: 95V0001 Enforcement Date: 04/04/00 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved System Name: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Violation Type: Initial Tap Sampling for Pb and Cu Contaminant: LEAD & COPPER RULE Compliance Period: 1993-07-01 - 2015-12-31 Violation ID: 95V0001 Enforcement Date: Not Reported Enf. Action: Not Reported System Name: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Violation Type: CCR Complete Failure to Report Contaminant: 7000 Compliance Period: 1999-10-19 - 2015-12-31 Violation ID: 99V0001 Enforcement Date: 2000-04-04 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved System Name: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Violation Type: CCR Complete Failure to Report Contaminant: 7000 Compliance Period: 1999-10-19 - 2015-12-31 Violation ID: 99V0001 Enforcement Date: 2000-04-04 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved System Name: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Violation Type: CCR Complete Failure to Report Contaminant: 7000 Compliance Period: 1999-10-19 - 2015-12-31 Violation ID: 99V0001 Enforcement Date: Not Reported Enf. Action: Not Reported System Name: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Violation Type: CCR Complete Failure to Report Contaminant: 7000 Compliance Period: 10/19/1999 0:00:00 - 12/31/2025 0:00:00 Violation ID: 99V0001 Enforcement Date: 4/12/2007 0:00:00 Enf. Action: Not Reported System Name: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Violation Type: CCR Complete Failure to Report Contaminant: 7000 Compliance Period: 10/19/1999 0:00:00 - 12/31/2025 0:00:00 Violation ID: 99V0001 Enforcement Date: No Enf Action as of Enf. Action: 10/17/2006 0:00:00 TC3396733.2s Page A-15 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: System Name: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Violation Type: CCR Complete Failure to Report Contaminant: 7000 Compliance Period: 1999-10-19 - 2015-12-31 Violation ID: 99V0001 Enforcement Date: Not Reported Enf. Action: Not Reported CONTACT INFORMATION: Name: ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK Population: 340 NE Contact: Office 114 -1/2 Mile Higher Phone: Not Reported Not Reported Address: 871 38TH AVE Not Reported Average Water Depth: Address 2: SANTA CRUZ Date: 04/14/1995 CA, 95 4 Site ID: 083000104T WNW Groundwater Flow: NE AQUIFLOW 37880 118 -114 Mile Higher Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth: Not Reported Average Water Depth: 4 Date: 04/16/1996 A5 Site ID: 083000431T SW Groundwater Flow: S AQUIFLOW 68195 118 -114 Mile Shallow Water Depth: 5 Higher Deep Water Depth: 8 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Date: 07/31/1991 A6 Site ID: 083000431T SW Groundwater Flow: S AQUIFLOW 68196 118 -114 Mile Shallow Water Depth: 5 Higher Deep Water Depth: 8 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Date: 07/31/1991 A7 Site ID: 083001570T SSW Groundwater Flow: Not Reported AQUIFLOW 52085 118 -1/4 Mile Higher Shallow Water Depth: 5 Deep Water Depth: 6.5 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Date: 06/1990 6 Site ID: 083000359T NE Groundwater Flow: SW AQUIFLOW 65144 114 -1/2 Mile Higher Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth: Not Reported Average Water Depth: 10 Date: 04/14/1995 TC3396733.2s Page A-16 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation 9 Site ID: 083000428T NNW Groundwater Flow: S 112 - 1 Mile Shallow Water Depth: 44.3 Higher Deep Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth: 45.3 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Date: 03/20/1997 10 Site ID: 083000618T SSE Groundwater Flow: Varies 112 - 1 Mile Higher Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth: Not Reported Average Water Depth: 5.01 Date: 04/06/1999 11 Site ID: 083000318T North Groundwater Flow: SSE 112-1 Mile Higher Shallow Water Depth: 33.73 Deep Water Depth: 40.78 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Date: 12/09/1997 Database EDR ID Number AQUIFLOW 68250 AQUIFLOW 54866 AQUIFLOW 33978 TC3396733.2s Page A-17 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 1 WSW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004673 118 -114 Mile Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05901104 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: DH Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Pasadena Oil Co. Wellnumber: 3 Leasename: Not Reported Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Any Field Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: 10W Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitu d e83: 33.615583 Longitude8: -117.930013 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 06667 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 000 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004673 A2 NNW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004682 118 -114 Mile Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905485 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AB Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Title Insurance & Trust Co. Wellnumber: 2 Leasename: Newport Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: 10W Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitude83: 33.61906 Longitude8: -117.928765 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 08470 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004682 A3 NW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004681 118 - 114 Mile TC3396733.2s Page A-18 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905484 Activewell: Y Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AP Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Title Insurance & Trust Co. Wellnumber: 1 Leasename: Newport Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: low Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitud e83: 33.619042 Longitude8: -117.929723 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 08470 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004681 B4 WNW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004675 118 -1/4 Mile Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905457 Activewell: Y Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AP Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Louis F. Dekay & Son Wellnumber: 1 Leasename: Newport Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: 10W Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitu d e83: 33.617756 Longitude8: -117.930872 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 05459 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004675 A5 NW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004687 118 - 114 Mile TC3396733.2s Page A-19 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905504 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AB Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Pasadena Oil Co. Wellnumber: 1 Leasename: Not Reported Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: low Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitud e83: 33.619461 Longitude8: -117.929663 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 06667 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004687 C6 NW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004680 114 -112 Mile Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905444 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AS Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Gilbert H. Beesemyer Wellnumber: 1 Leasename: Orange Co. Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: 10W Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitu d e83: 33.619014 Longitude8: -117.930746 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 03425 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004680 B7 WNW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004678 114 - 112 Mile TC3396733.2s Page A-20 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905446 Activewell: Y Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AP Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Gilbert H. Beesemyer Wellnumber: 3 Leasename: Orange Co. Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: low Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitude83: 33.6184 Longitude8: -117.931622 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 03425 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004678 C8 NW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004685 114 -112 Mile Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905447 Activewell: Y Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AP Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Gilbert H. Beesemyer Wellnumber: 1 Leasename: Steel Rig Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: 10W Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitude83: 33.619312 Longitude8: -117.931372 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 03425 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004685 C9 WNW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004683 114 - 112 Mile TC3396733.2s Page A-21 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905445 Activewell: Y Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AP Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Gilbert H. Beesemyer Wellnumber: 2 Leasename: Orange Co. Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: low Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitud e83: 33.619099 Longitude8: -117.931721 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 03425 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004683 C10 NW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004684 114 -112 Mile Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905456 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AB Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Louis F. Dekay & Son Wellnumber: 2 Leasename: Elmer Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: 10W Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitu d e83: 33.619287 Longitude8: -117.931695 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 05459 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004684 C11 WNW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004679 114 -112 Mile TC3396733.2s Page A-22 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905455 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AB Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Louis F. Dekay & Son Wellnumber: 1 Leasename: Elmer Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: low Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitud e83: 33.619001 Longitude8: -117.931917 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 05459 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004679 D12 WNW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004674 114 -112 Mile Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905453 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AB Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Louis F. Dekay & Son Wellnumber: 1 Leasename: Not Reported Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: 10W Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitu d e83: 33.617749 Longitude8: -117.932839 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 05459 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004674 D13 WNW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004677 114 - 112 Mile TC3396733.2s Page A-23 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905454 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AB Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Louis F. Dekay & Son Wellnumber: 2 Leasename: Not Reported Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: tow Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitud e83: 33.618121 Longitude8: -117.932819 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 05459 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004677 E14 NW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004699 114 -112 Mile Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05920847 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AB Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: City of Newport Beach Wellnumber: 2 Leasename: State Of Calfornia Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: low Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitu d e83: 33.621528 Longitude8: -117.931612 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: N1250 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004699 E15 NW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004702 114 -112 Mile TC3396733.2s Page A-24 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05921403 Activewell: Y Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AP Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Hoag Mem Hosp Presbyterian Apinumber: 05901043 Wellnumber: 6 Leasename: State Of California Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Wellnumber: Areaname: Any Area Not Reported Blmwell: Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: low Basemeridi: SB Elevation: 19.386 Section : Locationde: Not Reported 06S Range: Latitud e83: 33.621939988 SB Elevation: Longitude8: -117.93216295 Locationde: Gissourcec: gps Latitude83: Comments: 50408179. ssf Longitude8: Operatorco: H4525 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Operatorco: Site id: CAOG80000004702 059 Fieldcode: 16 ENE OIL—GAS CAOG80000004688 114 -112 Mile Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05901043 Activewell: Y Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AP Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: La Habra Valley Land & Water Co. Wellnumber: 1 Leasename: Not Reported Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Any Field Areaname: Any Area Section : 27 Township: 06S Range: 10W Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitude83: 33.62001 Longitude8: -117.920247 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 05159 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 000 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004688 E17 NW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004700 114 -112 Mile TC3396733.2s Page A-25 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05920846 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AB Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Hoag Mem Hosp Presbyterian Wellnumber: 1 Leasename: State Of California Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: tow Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitud e83: 33.621704 Longitude8: -117.932833 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: H4525 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004700 E18 NW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004708 114 -112 Mile Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05920851 Activewell: Y Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AP Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Hoag Mem Hosp Presbyterian Wellnumber: 5 Leasename: State Of California Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: low Basemeridi: SB Elevation: 25.274 Locationde: Not Reported Latitu d e83: 33.622457137 Longitude8: -117.932243736 Gissourcec: gps Comments: 50401049. cor Operatorco: H4525 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004708 F19 NW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004706 1l2 -1 Mile TC3396733.2s Page A-26 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05921409 Activewell: Y Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AP Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Hoag Mem Hosp Presbyterian Apinumber: 05901087 Wellnumber: 7 Leasename: State Of California Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Leasename: Not Reported Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: low Basemeridi: SB Elevation: 19.57 Locationde: Not Reported Township: 06S Latitud e83: 33.62207754 Basemeridi: SB Longitude8: -117.933679791 Gissourcec: gps Comments: 50401049. cor Operatorco: H4525 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004706 Cacountyco: 059 G20 ENE OIL—GAS CAOG80000004690 1/2 -1 Mile Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05901087 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: DH Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Newport Petro. Corp. Wellnumber: 3 Leasename: Not Reported Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Any Field Areaname: Any Area Section : 27 Township: 06S Range: 10W Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitu d e83: 33.620344 Longitude8: -117.918914 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 06256 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 000 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004690 F21 NW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004704 112-1 Mile TC3396733.2s Page A-27 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05920849 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AS Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Hoag Mem Hosp Presbyterian Apinumber: 05901228 Wellnumber: 3 Leasename: State Of California Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Leasename: Irvine Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: low Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Township: 06S Latitud e83: 33.621956 Basemeridi: SB Longitude8: -117.934502 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: H4525 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004704 Cacountyco: 059 G22 ENE OIL—GAS CAOG80000004697 1/2 -1 Mile Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05901228 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: DH Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: The Superior Oil Company Wellnumber: 1 Leasename: Irvine Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Any Field Areaname: Any Area Section : 27 Township: 06S Range: 10W Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitu d e83: 33.620944 Longitude8: -117.919198 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 57500 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 000 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004697 H23 NW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004713 112-1 Mile TC3396733.2s Page A-28 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905451 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AB Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: James Cagney-Wm. Cagney Wellnumber: 5 Leasename: Cagney Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: low Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitud e83: 33.623362 Longitude8: -117.932723 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: C0600 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004713 G24 ENE OIL—GAS CAOG80000004691 1/2 -1 Mile Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05901086 Activewell: Y Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AP Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Newport Petro. Corp. Wellnumber: 1 Leasename: Not Reported Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Any Field Areaname: Any Area Section : 27 Township: 06S Range: 10W Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitu d e83: 33.620392 Longitude8: -117.918009 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 06256 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 000 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004691 H25 NW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004714 112-1 Mile TC3396733.2s Page A-29 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905450 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AB Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: James Cagney-Wm. Cagney Wellnumber: 4 Leasename: Cagney Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: low Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitud e83: 33.623537 Longitude8: -117.934001 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: C0600 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004714 126 WNW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004689 112-1 Mile Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905501 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AS Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Orange County Refining Co. Wellnumber: 3 Leasename: Not Reported Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: 10W Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitu d e83: 33.620323 Longitude8: -117.937085 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 06470 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004689 127 WNW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004694 1/2 -1 Mile TC3396733.2s Page A-30 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905474 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AB Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Orange County Refining Co. Wellnumber: 1 Leasename: Not Reported Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: low Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitud e83: 33.620561 Longitude8: -117.937497 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 06470 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004694 J28 NE OIL—GAS CAOG80000004709 112-1 Mile Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05901275 Activewell: Y Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AP Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: U. S. Petro. Syndicate Wellnumber: 1 Leasename: Not Reported Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Any Field Areaname: Any Area Section : 27 Township: 06S Range: 10W Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitu d e83: 33.622677 Longitude8: -117.918576 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 08630 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 000 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004709 129 WNW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004696 112 -1 Mile TC3396733.2s Page A-31 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905471 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AB Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Fred D. McMillen Wellnumber: 4 Leasename: Not Reported Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: low Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitud e83: 33.620878 Longitude8: -117.937626 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 03100 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004696 130 WNW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004698 112-1 Mile Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905502 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AB Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: City of Newport Beach Wellnumber: 5 Leasename: Not Reported Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: 10W Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitu d e83: 33.621354 Longitude8: -117.937339 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: N1250 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004698 J31 ENE OIL—GAS CAOG80000004705 112-1 Mile TC3396733.2s Page A-32 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05901089 Activewell: Y Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AP Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Newport Petro. Corp. Wellnumber: 1 Leasename: Tunnel Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Any Field Areaname: Any Area Section : 27 Township: 06S Range: low Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitud e83: 33.621962 Longitude8: -117.917673 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 06256 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 000 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004705 K32 NW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004710 112-1 Mile Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905465 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AS Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Exxon Mobil Corporation Wellnumber: 1 Leasename: Newport Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: 10W Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitu d e83: 33.623009 Longitude8: -117.936189 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: E3700 Caccuntyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004710 K33 NW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004707 112-1 Mile TC3396733.2s Page A-33 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05920850 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AB Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: City of Newport Beach Apinumber: 05905475 Wellnumber: 4 Leasename: State Of California Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Leasename: Not Reported Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: low Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Township: 06S Latitud e83: 33.622354 Basemeridi: SB Longitude8: -117.936824 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: N1250 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004707 Cacountyco: 059 134 WNW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004695 112-1 Mile Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905475 Activewelt: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AB Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: City of Newport Beach Wellnumber: 2 Leasename: Not Reported Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 29 Township: 06S Range: 10W Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitu d e83: 33.620804 Longitude8: -117.938 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: N1250 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004695 35 NW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004716 112-1 Mile TC3396733.2s Page A-34 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905449 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AB Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: James Cagney-Wm. Cagney Wellnumber: 2 Leasename: Cagney Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: low Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitude83: 33.62457 Longitude8: -117.934418 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: C0600 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004716 36 ENE OIL—GAS CAOG80000004693 112-1 Mile Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05901088 Activewell: Y Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AP Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Newport Petro. Corp. Wellnumber: 4 Leasename: Not Reported Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Any Field Areaname: Any Area Section : 27 Township: 06S Range: 10W Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitude83: 33.620533 Longitude8: -117.915724 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 06256 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 000 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004693 37 NNW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004750 112-1 Mile TC3396733.2s Page A-35 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905448 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AB Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: James Cagney-Wm. Cagney Wellnumber: 1 Leasename: Cagney Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: low Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitud e83: 33.626121 Longitude8: -117.932751 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: C0600 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004750 38 North OIL—GAS CAOG80000004777 112-1 Mile Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05921173 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AB Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Hughes Aircraft Co. Wellnumber: HM -8 Leasename: Not Reported Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 21 Township: 06S Range: 10W Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitu d e83: 33.628251 Longitude8: -117.92743 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 04136 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004777 39 NNW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004759 112-1 Mile TC3396733.2s Page A-36 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905461 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AB Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Gilmore & Page Trucking Co. Wellnumber: 1 Leasename: Madeline Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 28 Township: 06S Range: low Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitud e83: 33.626871 Longitude8: -117.935163 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 03435 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004759 L40 NW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004715 112-1 Mile Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905460 Activewell: Y Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AP Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: T. F. Gesell Wellnumber: 1 Leasename: Not Reported Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 29 Township: 06S Range: 10W Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitu d e83: 33.624303 Longitude8: -117.93976 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 08199 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004715 L41 NW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004717 112-1 Mile TC3396733.2s Page A-37 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905915 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AB Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: West Newport Oil Co. Wellnumber: 320-R Leasename: Banning Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport, West Areaname: Onshore Section : 29 Township: 06S Range: low Basemeridi: SB Elevation: 65.315 Locationde: Not Reported Latitud e83: 33.624812832 Longitude8: -117.93970194 Gissourcec: gps Comments: 50401078. ssf Operatorco: W1250 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 504 Areacode: 06 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004717 42 NNW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004779 112-1 Mile Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905459 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AS Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Electro -Cap Inc. Wellnumber: 1 Leasename: Coffey Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport Areaname: Any Area Section : 21 Township: 06S Range: 10W Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitu d e83: 33.628288 Longitude8: -117.935034 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 02602 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 502 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004779 43 ENE OIL—GAS CAOG80000004712 112-1 Mile TC3396733.2s Page A-38 GEOCHECK,"- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05907871 Activewell: Y Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AP Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: Port Orange Asphalt Co. Wellnumber: 2 Leasename: Not Reported Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Any Field Areaname: Any Area Section : 27 Township: 06S Range: low Basemeridi: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Latitud e83: 33.623172 Longitude8: -117.91272 Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Operatorco: 06894 Cacountyco: 059 Fieldcode: 000 Areacode: 00 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004712 44 NW OIL—GAS CAOG80000004743 112 • 1 Mile Districtnu: 1 Apinumber: 05905911 Activewell: N Well type: OG Wellsymbol: AB Confidenti: Not Reported Operatorna: West Newport Oil Co. Wellnumber: 313 Leasename: Banning Blmwell: N Countyname: Orange Fieldname: Newport, West Areaname: Onshore Section : 29 Township: 06S Range: 10W Basemeridi: SB Elevation: 69.929 Locationde: Not Reported Latitu d e83: 33.625907066 Longitude8: -117.940174682 Gissourcec: gps Comments: 50401078. ssf Operatorco: W1250 Caccuntyco: 059 Fieldcode: 504 Areacode: 06 Td: 0 Site id: CAOG80000004743 TC3396733.2s Page A-39 GEOCHECKTI- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON AREA RADON INFORMATION State Database: CA Radon Radon Test Results Zipcode Num Tests 92663 60 > 4 pCi/L 0 Federal EPA Radon Zone for ORANGE County: 3 Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. Federal Area Radon Information for ORANGE COUNTY, CA Number of sites tested: 30 Area Average Activity % <4 pCi/L % 4-20 pCi/L Living Area - 1st Floor 0.763 pCi/L 100% 0% Living Area - 2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Basement Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported %>20 DCi/L 0% Not Reported Not Reported TC3396733.2s Page A-40 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000 -scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Scanned Digital USGS 7.5' Topographic Map (DRG) Source: United States Geologic Survey A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection. Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained. by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100 -year and 500 -year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002 and 2005 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. AQUIFLOWR Information System Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Services, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC3396733.2s Page A-41 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL I REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS Water Well Database Source: Department of Water Resources Telephone: 916-651-9648 California Drinking Water Quality Database Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-324-2319 The database includes all drinking water compliance and special studies monitoring for the state of California since 1984. It consists of over 3,200,000 individual analyses along with well and water system information. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION California Oil and Gas Well Locations Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-1779 Oil and Gas well locations in the state. RADON State Database: CA Radon Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-324-2208 Radon Database for California Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. TC3396733.2s Page A-42 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration California Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California's Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology. © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC3396733.2s Page A-43 Appendix D: Historical Research Information Proposed Townhomes 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA 92663 Inquiry Number: 3396733.3 August 23, 2012 440 Wheelers Farms Road Milford, CT 06461 rEDROEnvironmental Data Resources Inc 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Certified Sanborn® Map Report Site Name: Proposed Townhomes 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA 92663 EDR Inquiry # 3396733.3 Client Name: PSI, Inc. 6330 Gateway Drive Cypress, CA 90630-0000 Contact: Eric Fraske 8/23/12 E DIr Environmental Data Resources Inc The complete Sanborn Library collection has been searched by EDR, and fire insurance maps covering the target property location provided by PSI, Inc. were identified for the years listed below. The certified Sanborn Library search results in this report can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn and entering the certification number. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Certified Sanborn Results: Site Name: Address: City, State, Zip: Cross Street: P.O. # Project: Certification # Maps Provided: 1961 1959 1945 1929 Proposed Townhomes 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA 92663 NA 0559771 5C92-44E1-B8C5 Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanbome, Library search results Certificatlon # 5C9244E1-BRCS The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million Sanborn fire insurance maps, which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched: ✓ Library of Congress ✓ University Publications of America ✓ EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866'"" PSI, Inc. (the client) is permitted to make up to THREE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2012 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (Including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 3396733 - 3 page 2 Sanborn Sheet Thumbnails This Certified Sanborn Map Report is based upon the following Sanborn Fire Insurance map sheets. Volume 1, Sheet 5 1 s r� Volume 1, Sheet 29 Volume 1, Sheet 5 Volume 1. Sheet 5 1929 Source Sheets Volume 1. Sheet 5 Volume 1, Sheet 29 3396733 - 3 page 3 1961 Certified Sanborn Map This Certified Sanborn Map combines the following sheets. Outlined areas indicate map sheets within the collection. 0 Feet 150 300 600 Volume 1, Sheet 5 Volume 1, Sheet 29 3396733 - 3 page 4 1959 Certified Sanborn Map This Certified Sanborn Map combines the following sheets. Outlined areas indicate map sheets within the collection. 0 Feet 150 300 600 Volume 1, Sheet 5 Volume 1, Sheet 29 29 t 5 3396733 - 3 page 5 1945 Certified Sanborn Map This Certified Sanborn Map combines the following sheets. Outlined areas indicate map sheets within the collection. 0 Feet 150 300 600 Volume 1, Sheet 5 t N• s 3396733 - 3 page 6 1929 Certified Sanborn Map ;:i1 x �a3@ $$ 93y a¢ J O m a M � Taa Mudaan ��� BEACH N P1Rr cu s t� 1M J 31! Sca Name: PmacatlTd'm -a ede��'. 3ao3 via uee LIry. Si, ZIP: New Part Pea. cA99i 83 \ Client PSI, Inc E�fl Im,cy: 338013 a / I \ mfiw�anx S,S3a,San, .�, e 1� This Certified Sanborn Map combines the following sheets. Outlined areas indicate map sheets within the collection. Volume 1, Sheet 5 s 0 Feet 150 300 600 t .N- 3396733 - 3 page 7 Proposed Townhomes 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA 92663 Inquiry Number: 3396733.4 August 23, 2012 440 Wheelers Farms Road Milford, CT 06461 rEDROEnvironmental Data Resources Inc 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com EDR Historical Topographic Map Report Environmental Data Resources, Inc.s (EDR) Historical Topographic Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topographic Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the early 1900s. Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-500-352-0050 with any questions or comments. 35 This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report AS IS. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should the be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2012 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. Historical Topographic Map 9. L i Celery �� N, 1 -rt u,.,, M rz O / i F•' i, Hollow Rock ME TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Proposed Townhomes CLIENT: PSI, Inc. NNAME: SANTA ANA ADDRESS: 3303 Via Lido CONTACT: Eric Fraske MAP YEAR: 1901 Newport Beach, CA 92663 INQUIRY#: 3396733.4 T LAT/LONG: 33.6167 / -117.9273 RESEARCH DATE: 08/23/2012 SERIES: 15 SCALE: 1:62500 I, R t) -B-A r Historical Topographic Map . r_ TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Proposed Townhomes j�-•�••iii�l NNAME: SOUTHERN CA SHEET 1 ADDRESS: 3303 Via Lido CONTACT: Eric Fraske MAP YEAR: 1901 Newport Beach, CA 92663 INQUIRY#: 3396733.4 T LAT/LONG: 33.6167 1-117.9273 RESEARCH DATE: 08/23/2012 SERIES: 60 I�sct SCALE: 1:250000 1 , W goo its�sl:._ MI N:■N■■E■■i■I■I■M■■�/�f►■iff F. 0 ril��'�tif■lIo�� Sanr. 116191 ®I WA1111■ cur.'r_1ir■Ilts� rrrrrr�Mirrrrrrrrrlll■, ` '1 ■■■�Yf■11 i®':JCC r'.JkI ■■11?11��� ji Calls 00 2 IN 0 11711fl�r iif>�■r''am r�1RA!SS7CCil<�•—I�!!1 ` �,RFAME 'FT�v won ��i��l�''%'��q ■No .iC'.�1 MCI a. r f p, San Joaquin �'.'.'/-% •. frl. L — j Al.Hills Aha eP, r,:�. / << Arch Beach � G•rff 1 ', .LINi-bti :II ,1I Y. Pt._� TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Proposed Townhomes CLIENT: PSI, Inc. NNAME: SOUTHERN CA SHEET 1 ADDRESS: 3303 Via Lido CONTACT: Eric Fraske MAP YEAR: 1901 Newport Beach, CA 92663 INQUIRY#: 3396733.4 T LAT/LONG: 33.6167 1-117.9273 RESEARCH DATE: 08/23/2012 SERIES: 60 SCALE: 1:250000 Historical Topographic Map TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Proposed Townhomes CLIENT: PSI, Inc. NNAME: CORONA ADDRESS: 3303 Via Lido CONTACT: Eric Fraske MAP YEAR: 1902 Newport Beach, CA 92663 INQUIRY#: 3396733.4 T LAT/LONG: 33.6167 / -117.9273 RESEARCH DATE: 08/23/2012 SERIES: 30 SCALE: 1:125000 v �n Historical Topographic Map a i 7 ws . 10 10, 27 • � ,e � I� l/ eM'LM v!•a� r'u!;'r rs t:.� tr w 'Harbo ' .re wPo r'._ o �,•' � � /•;!�11 i.L:iT. /r f � .J 1' TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Proposed Townhomes CLIENT: PSI, Inc. NNAME: NEWPORT BEACH ADDRESS: 3303 Via Lido CONTACT: Eric Fraske T MAP YEAR: 1935 Newport Beach, CA 92663 INQUIRY#: 3396733.4 LAT/LONG: 33.6167 / -117.9273 RESEARCH DATE: 08/23/2012 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:31680 Historical Topographic Map TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Proposed Townhomes CLIENT: PSI, Inc. lowWS SANTA ANA ADDRESS: 3303 Via Lido CONTACT: Eric Fraske T MAP YEAR: 1942 Newport Beach, CA 92663 INQUIRY#: 3396733.4 LAT/LONG: 33.6167 / -117.9273 RESEARCH DATE: 08/23/2012 SERIES: 15 SCALE: 1:50000 I TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Proposed Townhomes CLIENT: PSI, Inc. NNAME: SANTA ANA ADDRESS: 3303 Via Lido CONTACT: Eric Fraske T MAP YEAR: 1942 Newport Beach, CA 92663 INQUIRY#: 3396733.4 LAT/LONG: 33.6167 / -117.9273 RESEARCH DATE: 08/23/2012 SERIES: 15 SCALE: 1:50000 Historical Topographic Map n n 11TN / 3Tm5a r IaTN '9T 111:, a� r t Q e' .n a o' Water• ' .a`� \ BM 83 \ V 1 awl � a a� O /, � ' e Py.JJ P ' JO ••• : Sf �° PFJ 1/ flefV •+ !\.i0., I=4 •/ !ry0 '�1 .�e �� _ � I I iii• 9.,P .. ,gay; •.,.' -moi nA aha b `a a •y ° S A `275-� 0 1P� �,r'� � � g} r:,� •0 Na'ewWrt arbor \ ��.,• ` I__ : I J Union H.S. NEWPORT BEACH 6IN h BM TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Proposed Townhomes CLIENT: PSI, Inc. NNAME: NEWPORT BEACH ADDRESS: 3303 Via Lido CONTACT: Eric Fraske T MAP YEAR: 1951 „W►i TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Proposed Townhomes CLIENT: PSI, Inc. NNAME: NEWPORT BEACH ADDRESS: 3303 Via Lido CONTACT: Eric Fraske T MAP YEAR: 1951 Newport Beach, CA 92663 INQUIRY#: 3396733.4 LAT/LONG: 33.6167 / -117.9273 RESEARCH DATE: 08/23/2012 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:24000 Historical Topographic Map dA [!��, Via. .o it r • TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Proposed Townhomes CLIENT: PSI, Inc. NNAME: NEWPORT BEACH ADDRESS: 3303 Via Lido CONTACT: Eric Fraske MAP YEAR: 1965 Newport Beach, CA 92663 INQUIRY#: 3396733.4 T i LAT/LONG: 33.6167 / -117.9273 RESEARCH DATE: 08/23/2012 SERIES: 7.5 N7 0( 1 _ � .':. •ill _ � IAF � ' \ `\ •7� T . al P' moral Hos dA [!��, Via. .o it r • TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Proposed Townhomes CLIENT: PSI, Inc. NNAME: NEWPORT BEACH ADDRESS: 3303 Via Lido CONTACT: Eric Fraske MAP YEAR: 1965 Newport Beach, CA 92663 INQUIRY#: 3396733.4 T LAT/LONG: 33.6167 / -117.9273 RESEARCH DATE: 08/23/2012 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:24000 Historical Topographic Map Park �1_, :Trader T Ir Park b � C*. R�Ie�Tanks ImpJir .,� '\ hjdmonal Hes I %�P y,28 � rt �.� azo Sr � ... .,v \�� \ ., `\ - • f,.s. 'h''y"•=(ate m \ \ r y ev G Liynt�� \�ghn,Harbor X33 ,Io Light @ N Parking Area �1--'ties�¢pas - � LI hl e COII Parkes IrP 34 a '°�¢ ,. NEWPORT BEACH h © Bay 1,, Gz , N e ^ WPor --� Park 00 GS J'J 71 de TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Proposed Townhomes CLIENT: PSI, Inc. NNAME: NEWPORT BEACH ADDRESS: 3303 Via Lido CONTACT: Eric Fraske YEAR: 1972 Newport Beach, CA 92663 INQUIRY#: 3396733.4 TMAP PHOTOREVISED FROM :1965 LAT/LONG: 33.6167 / -117.9273 RESEARCH DATE: 08/23/2012 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:24000 Historical Topographic Map F ;, Turruip _._A?rtw'ill al -- '- ` r H t i 9 s � �< <° �✓ - E� LiNhV _ A� / �oLige[ Harbor c, Parking Area Las Arenas Light s` Cr p Park— Ly NEWPORT BEACH e p°41 8ayk rye h W O n Al d lI n _W TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Proposed Townhomes CLIENT: PSI, Inc. NNAME: NEWPORT BEACH ADDRESS: 3303 Via Lido CONTACT: Eric Fraske YEAR: 1981 Newport Beach, CA 92663 INQUIRY#: 3396733.4 TMAP PHOTOREVISED FROM :1965 LAT/LONG: 33.6167 / -117.9273 RESEARCH DATE: 08/23/2012 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:24000 Proposed Townhomes 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA 92663 Inquiry Number: 3396733.6 August 23, 2012 440 Wheelers Farms Road Milford, CT 06461 800.352.0050 EDW Environmental Data Resources Inc www.edrnet.com SECTION Executive Summary Findings City Directory Images TABLE OF CONTENTS Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS'. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2012 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. DESCRIPTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Environmental Data Resources, Inc.'s (EDR) City Directory Abstract is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR's City Directory Abstract includes a search and abstract of available city directory data. For each address, the directory lists the name of the corresponding occupant at five year intervals. Business directories including city, cross reference and telephone directories were reviewed, if available, at approximately five year intervals for the years spanning 1920 through 2002. This report compiles information gathered in this review by geocoding the latitude and longitude of properties identified and gathering information about properties within 660 feet of the target property. A summary of the information obtained is provided in the text of this report. RESEARCH SUMMARY The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. An "X" indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. Year Sov e 2002 Haines Company 2001 Pacific Telephone 1997 Pacific Bell 1995 Pacific Bell 1992 Pacific Bell 1991 Pacific Bell 1986 Pacific Bell 1980 Pacific Telephone 1975 Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1971 Luskey Brothers Co., Inc. 1970 General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Pacific Telephone 1965 Ross Publications, Inc., 1961 Luskey Brothers & Co., 1960 Luskey Brothers & Co., 1956 Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1955 The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1952 Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1950 The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1946 Southern California Telephone Co. 1945 McCutcheon & Bragonier 1941 Southern California Telephone Co. 1936 Western Directory Co. 1930 Western Directory Co. 1926 Pacific Telephone TP Adloinina Text Abstract Source Image X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3396733-6 Page 1 C7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Year Source LP Adioinina Text Abstract Source Imaae 1925 Western Directory Co. 1922 Kaasen Directory Co. 1921 Western Directory Co. 1920 Santa Ana Directory Co. 3396733-6 Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The following addresses were selected by the client, for EDR to research. An "X" indicates where information was identified. Address 3355 Via Lido Type Findings Client Entered X 3396733-6 Page 3 FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA 92663 FINDINGS DETAIL Target Property research detail. Via 3303 Via Year Uses 1970 Christian Science Churches & Reading Rooms Comd Corona Del Mar Second Church of Newport Beach SI OOPaclfic Vw Dr CORONA del MAR First Church Sunday School VIA LIDO 3303 VIA LIDO Year Uses 1970 Christian Science Churches & Reading Rooms Contd Corona Del Mar Second Church of Newport Beach SI OOPaclfc Vw Dr CORONA del MAR First Church Source General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California Source General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California 3396733-6 Page FINDINGS ADJOINING PROPERTY DETAIL The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report. Detailed findings are provided for each address. 30TH ST 536 30TH ST Year Uses Source 1980 II Ss Alabama @Huntington Beach@ Pacific Telephone f1 & VACUUM S E RVICE Pacific Telephone 31ST 500 31ST Year Uses Source 1980 Kaai Ernest Pacific Telephone 501 31ST Year Uses Source 1995 Gilbert Marlynn B Pacific Bell 1991 Castle Designs Inc Pacific Bell 502 31ST Year Uses Source 1980 Sutton Paul Pacific Telephone I Becket K Pacific Telephone i Mendoza S Pacific Telephone 504 31ST Year Uses Source 1986 Miller Lorenzo C Submarine Engineering Pacific Bell Assoc Miller Plazi Submarine Engineering Assoc Pacific Bell Ransomiller Inc Pacific Bell 1980 Mi lier Plazi Submarine Engineering Assoc Pacific Telephone Miller R Pacific Telephone Miller R Pacific Telephone 505 31ST YAK Uses Source 1986 PATfI S ON S AIL DE S IGN Pacific Bell 3396733-6 Page 5 Year Uses 1980 Dinghy Supply Cc PATTIS ON S AIL DE S IGN 506 31ST Year 1995 1986 1970 508 31ST Year 1986 1980 509 31ST Year 1995 1980 510 31ST Year 1995 1991 1986 1980 31 ST ST Uses Alta Coffee& Roasting Cc Alta Co The SOFTENERS Uses Bus VILLAGE E S CROW CO IN C I Village Emporium The Uses Arena Design Merritt James S Uses Interport Limited Grogg Tom Artists & Designers G Grisamore Design Inc CalGil Financial Calif Automotive Research Merritt Jim Picture Framing 500 31ST ST Year Uses 2002 STURGIS William 1970 Benbow Hazel 1955 Saunders Eugene O paintng contr 501 31ST ST Year Uses 2002 CLOTHING CO VES VIRGINIA FINDINGS Source Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Source Pacific Bell Pacific Bell General Telephone Co., of California Source Pacific Bell Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Source Pacific Bell Pacific Telephone Source Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Source Haines Company General Telephone Co., of California The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Source Haines Company Haines Company 3396733-6 Page 6 Year Uses 2002 GILBERT Manlynn B 1995 Brooke interiors 1991 Gilbert Marilynn B 1986 Ice Cream Industries Inc Murphy Jas Patrick Crew West Marine Electronics 1975 Kent Richard A archt Jones Franklin H Sham Zachary James archt Jelensky Robt F Mrs Sham & Kent archts 504 31ST ST Imes Hilary & Associates Hilary Imes & Associates 1970 Dowry Chest The antlqs 1955 Johnston Glenn E 1950 Johnston Glenn E r 1946 Johnston Glenn E r 502 31ST ST Year Uses 2002 IWESTREMJohn 1991 Thompson Steve Core Indscpe archt Thompson Steve &Lot @Westminster@ 1975 Murphy Jas Patrick Buchanan Architects & Associates Sutton Paul 1970 Jones Franklin H 1955 Jelensky Robt F Mrs 503 31ST ST Year Uses 2002 XXXX 1991 Manuck Rich Core Indscpe archt La Roche Denis archt Buchanan Architects & Associates 1955 Pacific Provision Co 1950 Pacific Provision Co 1946 Lindsay Ralph B r 504 31ST ST Year Uses 1986 SUBMARIN EEN GIN E ERINGASS OC FINDINGS Source Haines Company Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. General Telephone Co., of California The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Southern California Telephone Co. Source Haines Company Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. General Telephone Co., of California The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Source Haines Company Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Southern California Telephone Co. Source Pacific Bell 3396733-6 Page 7 FINDINGS 505 31ST ST Year Uses Source 2002 XXXX Haines Company 1975 FARYMANN MARINE ENGINE Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. DISTRIBUTOR Smith Charles E Co Inc engns PERKINS MARINE ENGINE Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. DISTRIBUTOR Smith Charles E Co Inc engns SMITH CHARLES E CO INC engns Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 GRAY MARINE MOTOR CO DIMi General Telephone Co., of California Gray Marine Motors General Telephone Co., of California PERKINS MARINE DISTRIBUTOR Smith General Telephone Co., of California Charies E Co engns SMITH CHARLES E CO engns General Telephone Co., of California 1966 GRAY MARINE MOTOR CO DISTR Pacific Telephone Gray Marine Motors Pacific Telephone PERKINS MARINE DISTR Smith Charles Pacific Telephone E engns SMITH CHARLES E engns Pacific Telephone 506 31ST ST Year Uses Source 2002 LEWIS Stephen Haines Company COFFEE&ROASTNG FLETCHERMalihew Haines Company J 1995 Wilson Anthony Pacific Bell Wilson Anthony Pacific Bell 1975 AMERICAN WATER PRODUCTS Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Sealts Herbert S Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Newport Beach General Telephone Co., of California SOFTENERS General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Sealts Herbert S Pacific Telephone 1955 Dorris Robt Turn refinshng The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 508 31ST ST Year Uses Source 2002 FLUTER Russell Haines Company 1991 Reday M Pacific Bell Redco Transport Pacific Bell Redburn BL Pacific Bell 1975 Western Water & Appliance Co Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 Johnson Constance Pacific Telephone 3396733-6 Page 8 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1955 Christopher Richard T The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1946 Williams C A r Southern California Telephone Co. 509 31ST ST Year Uses Source 2002 LIVING CREATIONS Haines Company 1995 Living Creations Pacific Bell Imagine That Pacific Bell 1991 Newport Systems Pacific Bell Yachts Of Class intr desgn Pacific Bell Trollen&Associates Pacific Bell Trollinger Chas Pacific Bell W R C Associates Landscape Pacific Bell Architecture 1986 Earthguide Co Ltd Pacific Bell 1970 Dietz Louis General Telephone Co., of California 1946 Owen Florence S rl est Southern California Telephone Co. 510 31ST ST Year Uses Source 2002 JACKSON Roy P Haines Company JARDINIER PLANTER Haines Company SYSTEMS INC KURZETHEODOREMD Haines Company NEWPORT Haines Company SASH&DOOR Haines Company ALLEN LANCE Haines Company EDWARD JONES Haines Company GROGGTOM ARTISTS Haines Company INTERPORTLIMITED Haines Company 1995 Jackson R Peter Jr Pacific Bell Jackson Roy P Pacific Bell 1991 Tastevminc Pacific Bell Falmouth Yachts Inc Pacific Bell Jackson R Peter Jr Pacific Bell Jackson Roy P Pacific Bell Newport Sash & Door Pacific Bell Phoenix Expeditions Pacific Bell Phoenix Fiber Classic Diet Cookies Pacific Bell Phoenix Field Engrneernng Pacific Bell 3396733-6 Page 9 Year Uses 1991 Tobias & Miner Construction 1975 All American Publication Inc ARCHER PLUMBING & MECHANICAL Calif Automotive Research CONTRACTORS Sarkisian Scott Ace Plumbing OCee Ritch Production Ace Plumbng NORMANDY METAL REFINISHERS 1970 Festive Creations by Taylor 1966 Road Test Publications Hill Cunningham Automatic Pilot Co 1966 Yamaha World 1955 Terry Sales Co magnets 511 31ST ST Year Uses 2002 XXXX 1970 ARCHER PLUMBING & MECHANICAL Miller Lorenzo C Submarine Engineering CONTRACTORS 1955 Ace Plumbing 1950 Ace Plumbng 512 31ST ST Year Uses 1991 Silas Dean Ltd 1986 Perfect Detail 1975 Miller Lorenzo C Submarine Engineering Associates Miller Plazi Submarine Engineering Associates SUBMARINE ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES SUBRIAR R L DR DC 1966 SERVISOFT OF ORANGE COAST watr sftnrs Newport Beach 1955 SERVISOFT OF ORANGE COAST watr sftnrs Newport Beach 521 31ST ST Year Uses 1970 Anderson Richard D 1966 Rickman Margaret H 1955 Schreiber Louis J FINDINGS Source Pacific Bell Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. General Telephone Co., of California Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Source Haines Company General Telephone Co., of California The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Source Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Pacific Telephone The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Source General Telephone Co., of California Pacific Telephone The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 3396733-6 Page 10 FINDINGS 589 31ST ST Year Uses Source 1991 Real Net Capital Pacific Bell 32ND 475 32ND Year Uses Year Uses Source 1980 Newport Beach Pacific Telephone Fire Alarms Only Pacific Telephone Business Calls Only Pacific Telephone Fire Prevention Pacific Telephone Fire Paramedic&Emergency Calls Only Pacific Telephone Business Calls Pacific Telephone 530 32ND FIRE DE PARTME N T Pacific Telephone 503 32ND Uses Source Year Uses Source 1995 Lou Metzger Photography Pacific Bell Jolliffe & Associates Pacific Bell 505 32ND Year Uses Year Uses Source 1980 Social Services Ofc Pacific Telephone Thrift Shop Pacific Telephone Dental Center Pacific Telephone r Thrift Shop Assistance League Of Pacific Telephone Newport Beach Assistance League Of Orange Pacific Telephone 530 32ND Year Uses Source 1991 Temme J Pacific Bell Temmei Adveretisng Pacific Bell 32ND ST 475 32ND ST Year Uses Source 2002 xxxx Haines Company 1991 Newport Beach Pacific Bell 3396733-6 Page 11 Year 1975 1970 1966 1955 Uses FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Alarms Only La Habra To Report Fires Only Bu Lsiness calls La Habra Heights Newport Beach FIRE DEPT Newport Beach City of Look Under Newport Harbor or Corona Del Mar CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FIRE DEPT Newport Beach City of CITY HALL Newport Beach Fire Dept 503 32ND ST Year 2002 1991 1986 1970 1966 1955 FINDINGS Uses TECHNOLOGIES HISPANIC OUTDOOR ADVERTISING JAKOSKY PROPERTIES JOLLIFFE&ASSOCIATE QUESTAR ENGINEERING INC REGENCY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING TROWBRIDGECORP v CALIFORNIA OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DONATKURT ARCHITECT ENERGY EFFICIENT Computype Inc Etc Interior Decor TSSI echnical Support Services In Multi Media Model Aureo Exito Inc MultiMedia Advertising Multi Media Group Inc NASCO THE FRED NASH COMPANY Nash Fred Co Building Contractors Ofc ONeill & Associates bldg desgn Seven Islands Realty &.Investment Co Source Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Source Haines Company Haines Company Haines Company Haines Company Haines Company Haines Company Haines Company Haines Company Haines Company Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell General Telephone Co., of California Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 3396733-6 Page 12 FINDINGS 505 32ND ST Year Uses Source 2002 XXXX Haines Company 1991 Dental Center Pacific Bell Thrift Shop Pacific Bell Assistance League Of Orange Pacific Bell Assistance League Service Center Pacific Bell Thrift Shop Assistance League Of Pacific Bell Newport Beach Thrift Village Thrift Store Pacific Bell 1986 Assistance League Service Center Pacific Bell Thrift Shop Pacific Bell Dental Center Pacific Bell 1975 Dental Center Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Service Center Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Social Services Ofc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Thrift Shop Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Assistance League Of Orange Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Assistance League of Newport Beach General Telephone Co., of California Sery Center General Telephone Co., of California Social Services Ofc General Telephone Co., of California Thrift Shop General Telephone Co., of California Assistance League of Newport Beach General Telephone Co., of California Thrift Shop Assistance League of Newport General Telephone Co., of California Beach Assistance League of Newport Beach General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Sery Center Pacific Telephone Assistance League of Newport Beach Pacific Telephone Assistance League of Newport Beach Pacific Telephone Thrift Shop Pacific Telephone Assistance League of Newport Beach Pacific Telephone social services ofc Thrift Shop Assistance League of Newport Pacific Telephone Beach 1955 Thrift Shop The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Sery Center The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 530 32ND ST Year Uses Source 2002 MT EVEREST MISSIONS Haines Company 1991 Telephone Service Group Pacific Bell 3396733-6 Page 13 FINDINGS Year Uses 1975 Ofc 534 32ND ST Year Uses 1946 Street Dept Yard LAFAYETTE AVE 3010 LAFAYETTE AVE Year Uses 2002 XXXX 1995 CANNERY RESTAURANT THE Cannery Cruises 1991 CANNERY RESTAURANT T@Huntington Beach@ 1986 Cannery Cruises And Catering Cannery Cruises CAN N E RY T@Huntington Beach@ restrnt 1980 CAN N E RY T@Huntington Beach@ resirnt 1975 CANNERY THE restrnt 3102 LAFAYETTE AVE Year Uses 2002 XXXX 1946 Hoffman A C acct LAFAYETTE DR 3010 LAFAYETTE DR Y= Uses 1970 Western Canners Co Rainwater Miles H 3102 LAFAYETTE DR Year Uses 1970 Ga cry Lido Galerie Lido Source Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Source Southern California Telephone Co. Source Haines Company Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Telephone Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Source Haines Company Southern California Telephone Co. Source General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California Source General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California 3396733-6 Page 14 f 1;rM4I"_=16i� 3000 LAFAYETTE ST Year Uses 1955 Canning Plant 1950 Canning Plant 1946 Westrn Canners Co 3010 LAFAYETTE ST Year Uses 1966 Westrn Canners Co Genl Ofcs Westrn Canners Co Genl Ofcs Canning Plant 3012 LAFAYETTE ST Year Uses 1950 West Coast Packing Corp 1946 Italian Food Products Co Inc Landing West Coast Packing Corp 3112 LAFAYETTE ST Year Uses 1955 Cole Walter E Coles Boat Landing & Coles Port Lido Bridge Ofc Coles Boat Landing & Coles Port 1950 Coles Lido Cove Boat Landing Cole Walter E Coles Lido Cove Boat Landing 1946 Lido Cove Boat Landing Cole Walter E Lido Cove Boat Landing LIDO NORD 3324 LIDO NORD Year Uses 1980 Thomas Geo 3336 LIDO NORD Year Uses 1986 Burns Lee & Billie @Anaheim@ 1980 Burns Lee & Billie @Anaheim@ FINDINGS Source The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Southern California Telephone Co. Source Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Source The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Southern California Telephone Co. Southern California Telephone Co. Source The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Southern California Telephone Co. Southern California Telephone Co. Source Pacific Telephone Source Pacific Bell Pacific Telephone 3396733-6 Page 15 FINDINGS 3388 LIDO NORD Year Uses Source 1980 TIFFANZS PRIVATE CLUB & DIS Pacific Telephone 1995 Atalla John Dr COT@Huntington Beach@ QUE Baker George J 3404 LIDO NORD Elliott Juanell Year Uses Source 1980 Academy Of Mens Gymnastics Irvine Pacific Telephone Pacific Bell Gymnastic Pacific Bell Klehler Eldon ACADE MY OF LAN GUAGd S Pacific Telephone 3416 LIDO NORD Marshack Irving L Year Uses Source 1986 HARBOR TRAVE L Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Dreyer Co mfrsagt Pacific Bell 1980 George Charles Realty Cc Pacific Telephone LIDO PARK DR 601 LIDO PARK DR Year Uses Source 2002 CONDOMINIUMS Haines Company 601 LIDO CNDMNMS Haines Company 1995 Atalla John Dr Pacific Bell Baker George J Pacific Bell Elliott Juanell Pacific Bell Glllin Don F Pacific Bell Gilliland Scott & Chrlstye Pacific Bell Grace Francis H Pacific Bell Guity Mehr Davood Pacific Bell Klehler Eldon Pacific Bell Kiehler E Pacific Bell Marshack Irving L Pacific Bell Marshack Sylvia Pacific Bell Miller Marilyn L Pacific Bell Miller Willis L Pacific Bell Park S C Pacific Bell Reed C Pacific Bell Six 0 One Lido Condominiums Pacific Bell Six Rickey C Pacific Bell Six 0 One Lido Homeowners Association Pacific Bell 3396733-6 Page 16 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1995 Thomas Jos Mi Pacific Bell Vanderstar C C Pacific Bell Willson Ted C Pacific Bell Writer Carl P Pacific Bell Writer Rita V Pacific Bell Arans Leslie G Pacific Bell Rickard Glenn Pacific Bell Stelgrod Alan A Pacific Bell Wright Josephine Pacific Bell 1991 Atalla John Dr Pacific Bell Grace Francis H Pacific Bell Kiehler E Pacific Bell Kiehler Eldon Pacific Bell Mc Donald Henry MD Pacific Bell Segerstrom R Pacific Bell 1986 Arens Leslie G Pacific Bell Atalla John Dr Pacific Bell Bartlett Rex & Emma Pacific Bell Reed C Pacific Bell Dougher Donald J Pacific Bell Elliott Juanell Pacific Bell Glum Don F Pacific Bell Grace Francis H Pacific Bell GuityMehr Davwood Pacific Bell Hams Robt Pacific Bell Hudson Enterprises Pacific Bell Kiehler E Pacific Bell Kiehler Eldon Pacific Bell Marchisset Roger Pacific Bell Marshack Irving L Pacific Bell Marshack Sylvia Pacific Bell McDonald Henry MD Pacific Bell McIntosh Audrey F Pacific Bell Miller Marilyn L Pacific Bell Miller Willis L Pacific Bell Park S C Pacific Bell Part Isidor Pacific Bell Rickard Glenn Pacific Bell 3396733-6 Page 17 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 Segerstrom R Pacific Bell 1980 Kiehler Christopher Pacific Telephone S Arens Leslie G Pacific Telephone Arens M Pacific Telephone Atalla John Or Pacific Telephone n It Rx Em Me Pacific Telephone Res Pacific Telephone Cone C D Pacific Telephone Dunlap Edw H Pacific Telephone Galardi John N Pacific Telephone Grace Francis H Pacific Telephone Gulty Mehr Davwood Pacific Telephone Guluer Pacific Telephone Harris Robt L Pacific Telephone Hendershot Trevor R Pacific Telephone Hendershott D Pacific Telephone Hendershott D C Pacific Telephone Kiehler Eldon Pacific Telephone Kruwell Everett L Pacific Telephone Marchisset Claudine Pacific Telephone Marchisset Roger Pacific Telephone Marshack Irving L Pacific Telephone Marshack Sy via Pacific Telephone Mc Donald Dorothy Mrs Pacific Telephone Meadows Geo T Pacific Telephone Meadows Iola Pacific Telephone Miller Marilyn L Pacific Telephone Miller Willis L Pacific Telephone Molinaro Eugene W Pacific Telephone Part Isidor Pacific Telephone Reed C Pacific Telephone Rickard Glenn Pacific Telephone Segerstrom R Pacific Telephone Silverman Lloyd MD Pacific Telephone Six One Lido Condominiums Pacific Telephone Six O One Lido Homeowners Association Pacific Telephone Trend Industries Pacific Telephone Trend Mills Division Champlon Pacific Telephone International 3396733-6 Page 18 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 Wright M A Pacific Telephone Writer Carl P Pacific Telephone Writer Rita V Pacific Telephone 1975 Six O One Lido Condominiums Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Six O One Lido Homeowners Association Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Res Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Bremer W L Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Elliott Juanell Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Gillin Don F Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Segerstrom R Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 611 LIDO PARK DR Year Uses Source 2002 VISTADELLIDO Haines Company 1995 Larkin Dan Pacific Bell Rankin B Pacific Bell Shlemon Roy J Pacific Bell Vista Del Udo Pacific Bell Yack Victor R Pacific Bell American Machinery And Engineering Inc Pacific Bell Butcher Ralph L Pacific Bell Collins Harold R Jr Pacific Bell 1991 Axelson JC Pacific Bell Dudas Bill Pacific Bell Smith KI Pacific Bell 1986 Bandy Donald J Pacific Bell Brown Roger D Pacific Bell Brunmark W J Pacific Bell Bulman Jas L Pacific Bell Butcher Ralph L Pacific Bell Collins Harold R Jr Pacific Bell Dudes Bill Pacific Bell Ferraro Carl Pacific Bell Ferraro Sara Pacific Bell Fisher Katherine F Pacific Bell Gilbertd J Pacific Bell Hayton Arthwell C & Nancy Pacific Bell Koll Milton L Mrs Pacific Bell Lannon Mildred E Pacific Bell 3396733-6 Page 19 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 Lari Sn Dan Pacific Bell Painter Chas H Pacific Bell Piazza Ben J Pacific Bell Rankin B Pacific Bell Shlemon Roy J Pacific Bell Stoneman A C Pacific Bell Taishoff Claire Pacific Bell Acito R J Pacific Bell Axelson J C Pacific Bell Hakness Edw L Pacific Bell 1980 Schatzman Morris D Pacific Telephone Stoneman A C Pacific Telephone Strachota Carroll J Pacific Telephone Taishoff Claire Pacific Telephone Vista Del Lido Pacific Telephone Yack Victor R Pacific Telephone Mitchell Kenneth C Pacific Telephone Acito R J Pacific Telephone Axelson J C Pacific Telephone I Brunmark W J Pacific Telephone Butcher Ralph L Pacific Telephone Collins Harold R Jr Pacific Telephone Dudas Bill Pacific Telephone Duda Eugene Pacific Telephone Ferraro Carl Pacific Telephone I Ferrero Sara Pacific Telephone Gessler Clyde H Pacific Telephone Gessler GL POBox 978 @Tustin@ Pacific Telephone Gilbert E J Pacific Telephone Harkness Edw L Pacific Telephone Koll Milton L Mrs Pacific Telephone Larkin Dan Pacific Telephone Medearis Miller Pacific Telephone Painter Chas H Pacific Telephone 1975 Acito R J Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Anschel Leo Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Axelson J C Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Belyea Jack L Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3396733-6 Page 20 Year 1975 1970 Uses Brunmark W J Bulman Jas L Butcher Ralph L Cronshey Geo H Dudas Bill Ferraro Carl Ferraro Sara Freeman Jas Mrs Gessler Clyde H Gilbert E J Harkness Edw L Harvey Harold H Kristensen Naomi Dunlap Lustig Mae L Mrs Marvin D S Mitchell Kenneth C Morris Bert M Mrs Painter Chas H Papazian Zabelle Mrs Paulson E S Portman A Nelson Mrs Schatzman Morris D Sparks Alice E Steele Robt E Stoneman A C Strachota Carroll J Vista Del Lido Yack Victor R Axelson J C Blanchard Jud Burt Gentle Co Inc Butcher Ralph L Fowler Wm H Harkness Edw L Harvey Harold H Mic Cartney C P Mc Cartin Huckenpahler & Dion attys Morris Bert M Mrs FINDINGS Source Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California 3396733-6 Page 21 Year 1970 1966 Uses pointer Chas H Painter Chas E Paulson E S Reichert E E Mrs Smith Clare W Sparks Alice E Steele Robt E Stoneman A C Vista Be] Lido Boat Yack Victor R Yack Victor R Res Bowen Vaughn Bernard W Worth California Digest Inc Res Blanchard Jud Butcher Ralph L Gessler Clyde H Haefner Howard H Harkness Edw L Harvey Harold H Johnston Elta P Joyce M F Kristensen Naomi Dunlap Maple Berwyn H Mayo Edward L Mc Cardie Randall R Miller Mary Mrs Morrison Gretta F Newman Robt E Paulson E S Peck Greta K Pittenger Harold C Posth Maxine R Posth Robt J Ralke M C Reed Robt L FINDINGS Source General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone 3396733-6 Page 22 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1966 Reichert E E Mrs Pacific Telephone Lido Shores Hotel & Marina Russell Mary Pacific Telephone 1991 Russell Ted Pacific Telephone BAY THE Smith Clare W Pacific Telephone Staub Jack Pacific Telephone Salley Richard & Penny Stoneman A C Pacific Telephone Stoneman A C Pacific Telephone Mc Kinney David W Sweeney Peggy Mrs Pacific Telephone Tarnutzer Byron W Pacific Telephone Granat Saml W Velie Grant P Pacific Telephone Vista Del Lido Pacific Telephone Beck Robt NI Vista Del Lido Pacific Telephone Voeickel Marguerite Pacific Telephone Williamson Geo W Pacific Telephone Yack Victor R Pacific Telephone Zwebell E W Pacific Telephone 615 LIDO PARK DR Year Uses Source 2002 EUCCOLAJo Haines Company 617 LIDO PARK DR Year Uses 2002 FEDISHON Edward 1995 Lido Shores Hotel & Marina Inn On The Bay 1991 LITTLE INN ON T@Huntington Beach@ BAY THE 1986 Best Western Lido Shores Hotel & Marina LIDO S HORE S HOTE L & MARIN A Salley Richard & Penny 1980 California Real Estate Consultants Inc LIDO S HORE S HOTE L & MARIN A Mc Kinney David W BESTAW ESTE RN LIDO S HORES HOTE L & MARIN A e 1975 Granat Saml W LIDO SHORES HOTEL & MARINA Sellon Dale Dr 1970 Beck Robt NI Source Haines Company Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. General Telephone Co., of California 3396733-6 Page 23 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1970 LIDO SHORES HOTEL & MARINA General Telephone Co., of California Reeder Robt W General Telephone Co., of California Sellon Dale Dr General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Jackson Bob Pacific Telephone LIDO SHORES HOTEL & MARINA Pacific Telephone 621 LIDO PARK DR Year Uses Source 2002 EILERTSEN Herbert Haines Company HANCOCK Barry W Haines Company OKelly Michael Haines Company RUCH Jim Haines Company 1995 Cradle Gary & Kathy Pacific Bell Day Dale F Pacific Bell Ketcham Edwin L Pacific Bell Rogers Robert Reed Pacific Bell Scott RB & Associates Pacific Bell Trimm B W Pacific Bell Wilson Ernest & S Pacific Bell 1986 Angermann Horst F G Pacific Bell Batson J Hobart Pacific Bell Batson Lee M Pacific Bell Beck Carl Pacific Bell Cramer J W Pacific Bell Gimnini Gerald A Pacific Bell Scott R B & Associates Pacific Bell 1980 Hill Ruth Pacific Telephone Angermann Horst F G Pacific Telephone Baker Toby Pacific Telephone Batson J Hobait Pacific Telephone Batson Lee M Pacific Telephone Frost Lore A Pacific Telephone Grimm Dale Pacific Telephone Laulainen Frank Pacific Telephone Scott R B & Associates Pacific Telephone Stenning Barbara Pacific Telephone Stenning Barbara Pacific Telephone Wilson Ralph P Jr Pacific Telephone 1975 Byers Hap Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3396733-6 Page 24 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1975 Giannini Gerald A Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1986 Hill Ruth Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1980 Ring Bros Development Corp Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. White Jack E Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Wilson Ralph P Jr Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 630 LIDO PARK DR BRASHEARS CENTER Year Uses Source 2002 GUGASIAN Lemon Haines Company Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. NEWPORT BEACH Haines Company Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. BLUE WATER GRILL Haines Company 1995 Newport Beach Pacific Bell Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Dena Point Pacific Bell 1986 Newport Beach Pacific Bell 1980 Irvin Dwayne Pacific Telephone Delaneys Salty Sams Fast Food Pacific Telephone Restaurants Newport Beach Pacific Telephone 1975 Newport Beach Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Sea Shanty Restaurant General Telephone Co., of California Delaneys Sea Shanty Restaurant General Telephone Co., of California 631 LIDO PARK DR Year Uses Source 2002 XXXX Haines Company 1970 Schwartz Dan General Telephone Co., of California 632 LIDO PARK DR Year Uses Source 2002 GALLANTDonna Haines Company 1986 Brady Frank Pacific Bell 1980 New port Beach Pacific Telephone Gates Bob Pacific Telephone Newport Beach Pacific Telephone 1975 BRASHEARS CENTER Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Brayton Michael Durlin Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. General Office Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Fast Foods Kettle Of Fish Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Purchasing Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Kings Lido Center Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3396733-6 Page 25 Year 1975 1970 d=. Uses Petersen Weldeon Brashear Richard L Kings Lido Center Davys Locker Sportfishing Davies Locker Sportnshing DAVEYS LCER SPORTFISHING Daves Locker SportfishIng Brayton Michael Durlin Ziegler Robt yacht brkr SWEET CLARK YACHT SALES & GENL INS Di Malo Eugene N 633 LIDO PARK DR Year 2002 1995 1991 1986 Uses APARTMENTS BAUMAN Reed FRANKELSam FRANSENG MACDONALD Richard WINTONJP WOJDYNSKI Margarew WOJDYNSKIPa UI BUDDHASFAVORITE THELOG DESIGN ALLIANCE VESTDavud Bauman Reed Caine Wm A Sr Frankel Sam Frankel Sam Hughes Patricia Lang Robert D Martin John M Petrucelli Anthony Jensen Robt C Kalb John L Jensen RobtC Lang RD Bauman Reed FINDINGS Source Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Source Haines Company Haines Company Haines Company Haines Company Haines Company Haines Company Haines Company Haines Company Haines Company Haines Company Haines Company Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell 3396733-6 Page 26 Year Uses 1986 Bueno ElmerT Caine Wm A Sr Frankel Sam Handler Stephen Jensen RobtC Kalb John L Lang R D Lang Robt D Martin John M Martine Kurt W Moody Robt D Moudy Robt D 1980 Firth Dean V Jensen RobtC Kalb John L an Robt D Ostermiller Wm I MD Shatter Joseph N Winton J P I Bauman Reed Caine Wm A Sr 1975 Lang Robt D Six Twentyone Lido Park Drive 1970 Stegall Robt L Tanske Doris J Betsinger S H Brown David I Foulger OG Frankel Irwin Frost Oakley Gelson Bette Jean Higgins Sterling F f Higgins Thos Martin Willow Nord Mc Intosh Robt M Shack Richard M Shafer J R Skadron Jack H FINDINGS Source Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California 3396733-6 Page 27 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1966 Bowman Robt E Pacific Telephone Cabanas Marinas Pacific Telephone Cabanas Marinas Pacific Telephone Downs Cooper Pacific Telephone Draper Howard C Pacific Telephone Frankel Irwin Pacific Telephone Harer Helmut Pacific Telephone Joy Austin S Pacific Telephone Nachman D A Pacific Telephone Stanul S R Pacific Telephone Taylor Thos J Jr Pacific Telephone Voyagers Yacht Club Pacific Telephone 634 LIDO PARK DR Year Uses Source 1995 Cafe Ole Pacific Bell 1986 Sea Enterprises Pacific Bell Rice John Pacific Bell 640 LIDO PARK DR Year Uses Source 1995 McIntire Glenn & Associates Pacific Bell Design Alliance Pacific Bell 700 LIDO PARK DR Year Uses Source 1995 Bates Leneve Pacific Bell Bigtime Enterprises Pacific Bell Coleman Craig C Pacific Bell Cox Russell E Pacific Bell Cuthbert Jas Pacific Bell Diumenti Steven Pacific Bell Lauth Edward Pacific Bell Lewis Donald Jdr Pacific Bell Lyon Edouard E Jr Pacific Bell Nitkin Raymond Pacific Bell Professional Insurance Network Pacific Bell Reynolds Grant Pacific Bell Vis Donald A Pacific Bell 3396733-6 Page 28 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 Alegna KM Pacific Bell Bates Leneve Pacific Bell Bedwell Frank Pacific Bell Chapman Marine Industries Pacific Bell Cuthbert Jas Pacific Bell East K Pacific Bell Fatty Knees Pacific Bell Geisman Ronald L Pacific Bell Ingram Curt Pacific Bell Karch I I Pacific Bell Lyon Edouard E Jr Pacific Bell Mc Coy Michael G Pacific Bell Millett James Pacific Bell N Mtkin Raymond Pacific Bell Reynolds Grant Pacific Bell Riddle Yacht & Ship Brokers Pacific Bell Roddick Enc M Pacific Bell Rudestam Rolf Pacific Bell Schmitz Wm Pacific Bell Sempliner Edw S Pacific Bell Seven Seas Services Inc Pacific Bell 1980 Abraham Miichael A Pacific Telephone Abraham Michael F HS Pacific Telephone Armey E J Pacific Telephone Bedwell Frank Pacific Telephone Buckey Harold Mi Pacific Telephone Burns Leneve Pacific Telephone I East K Pacific Telephone I Graham Ernie Pacific Telephone Gr Inst JM Pacific Telephone Heiser A J Pacific Telephone Herold Don C Pacific Telephone i Hiebert Wilbur Pacific Telephone Karch CJ Pacific Telephone Kasser John Pacific Telephone Lyon Edouard E Jr Pacific Telephone Morin Jas Pacific Telephone Riddle aes C Pacific Telephone 3396733-6 Page 29 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 Sass GR Pacific Telephone Schmitz Wm Pacific Telephone Stone Kathryn Pacific Telephone Wagner Vernon W Pacific Telephone Warren Mark A Pacific Telephone 1975 Beal C A Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Bobbitt Robt B Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Cullen Dorothea V Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Elkey A I Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Grace C T Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Granat J M Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Harshbarger G G Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Hylton Vernon Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Lido Village Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Meeks Don Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Olson Marion Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Ridco Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Riddle Jas C Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Rosenbaum Rae Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Schmitz Wm Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Stone L C Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Sweet Clark Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Warren Mark A Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Willis Leneve Bates Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Zemenick Loren Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 Bailey Betty Pacific Telephone Bailey R M Pacific Telephone Brown Irene Pacific Telephone Cooper Camron Pacific Telephone Diwens Audrey C Pacific Telephone Emerson Frank Pacific Telephone Emerson Jas Pacific Telephone Evans Jas M Pacific Telephone Garber Paul F Pacific Telephone Johnston Glenn E Pacific Telephone Key Carl L Pacific Telephone Kiley Ron D Pacific Telephone Kruse O H Pacific Telephone 3396733-6 Page 30 Year Uses 1966 Lido Village Biala Josef P Nowak Jos R Blelamowicz Wm Pralle Ennis Borgia Sarafina Schullman Marie F Broderick John E Stockman Ruby Clerlhue WE Yetter Floyd C 701 LIDO PARK DR Year Uses 1986 Peterson Wm B III 1980 Flynn E E Pacific Bell Newell Robert P Pacific Bell Woodward Mary M Pacific Bell Arms Alan Pacific Bell Flynn E E 1975 Erickson Russell J Hernandez Fred Newell Robert F Olsen Theodore E Woodward Mary M 1966 Walshe Bill Dubbs Carbon Godbey D L 710 LIDO PARK DR FINDINGS Source Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Source Pacific Bell Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Year Uses Source 1995 Alex Jacquelyn M Pacific Bell Biala Josef P Pacific Bell Blelamowicz Wm Pacific Bell Borgia Sarafina Pacific Bell Broderick John E Pacific Bell Clerlhue WE Pacific Bell Day Sandy Pacific Bell Howard Jerome Pacific Bell Laurence Richard R Pacific Bell Slayback Jas T Pacific Bell 1986 Slayback Jas T Pacific Bell Smith Jack W Pacific Bell Snell S Pacific Bell 3396733-6 Page 31 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 Stewart Geo L Pacific Bell Alex Jacquelyn M Pacific Bell Anderson I G Pacific Bell Arnold Fred W Pacific Bell Audio Alarm Systems Pacific Bell Bielamowicz Wm Pacific Bell Borgia Mary Pacific Bell Borgia Sarafina Pacific Bell Brodenck John E Pacific Bell Clenhue W E Pacific Bell Cldne Thayer W Pacific Bell Coleman Robin R Pacific Bell Craig H C Pacific Bell Cummo Jas J Sr Pacific Bell Day Sandy Pacific Bell De Was Debbie Pacific Bell Eliott Dan Pacific Bell Ernst L Pacific Bell Fisher Milton J & Maryelyn B Pacific Bell Freed Diana Pacific Bell Greenberg Harry & Evelyn Pacific Bell Hill Richard F Pacific Bell Howard Jerome Pacific Bell Hunter Donald Raymond Pacific Bell Katz Alexander Pacific Bell Laurence Richard R Pacific Bell Lorenzen Viloette Pacific Bell Maxhimer Ralph W Pacific Bell Rest E N Pacific Bell Rest Jerry Pacific Bell Rifkin Alan Pacific Bell Saxton Carl Pacific Bell Secret J Nicholas Pacific Bell Siconolfl Paul R Pacific Bell 1980 Alex Jacquelyn M Pacific Telephone Allen Kent Pacific Telephone Arnold B L Pacific Telephone Arnold Fred W Pacific Telephone 3396733-6 Page 32 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 Benson W K Pacific Telephone Bielamowicz Wm Pacific Telephone Clay Richard D Pacific Telephone Clerhu W E Pacific Telephone Coleman Robin R Pacific Telephone Day Sandy Pacific Telephone Downing Tom Pacific Telephone Dykzeul T H Pacific Telephone Forsen Curtis Pacific Telephone French Ferdinand L Pacific Telephone Greenberg Harry & Evelyn Pacific Telephone Grimm MHD Pacific Telephone Hiebert AL Pacific Telephone Howard Jerome Pacific Telephone Howe J Pacific Telephone Hunter Donald Raymond Pacific Telephone Jackson Harry P Pacific Telephone Ka Alexander Pacific Telephone Kilman H W Pacific Telephone t Koppes John Pacific Telephone ouffjlan Ata Pacific Telephone Laurence Richard R Pacific Telephone Lido Mobile Home Park Pacific Telephone Lido Nautilus Physical Fitness Center Pacific Telephone Lorenzen Viloette Pacific Telephone I Maxhimer Ralph W Pacific Telephone Mays Bennie L Pacific Telephone Phillips Fred I Pacific Telephone Pusheck Carol H Pacific Telephone Rest E N Pacific Telephone Riggs Ralph H Pacific Telephone Roy E H Pacific Telephone Saxton Carl Pacific Telephone Scott Phil H Pacific Telephone Smith Jack W Pacific Telephone Swartzbaugh A E Pacific Telephone Tiutini John Pacific Telephone Tutone M Pacific Telephone 3396733-6 Page 33 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 Van Deusen Edw B Pacific Telephone Yacht Norjac Pacific Telephone Zdenek Frank Pacific Telephone 1975 Allen Kent Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Anderson Winston C Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Barnett Wm H Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Bielamowicz Michael Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Brockow Jesse L Dr Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Clay Richard D Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Clerihue W E Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Day Sandy Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Elliott Geo R Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. French Ferdinand L Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Gallon Helen D Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Giner Frank Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Hardcastle Frank Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Hardcastle Frank & Associates Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Hayes Corelius Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Hayman Larry H Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Hiebert A L Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Jackson Harry P Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Kilman H W Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Landegger Geo Dr Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Leon Andrew R Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Lido Mobile Home Park Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Maxhimer Ralph W Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Miller Albert J Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Phillips Fred G Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Posner Henry Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Reese Earl D Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Rest E N Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Riggs Ralph H Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Saxton Carl Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Scott Alton F Dr Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Scott Phil H Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Spickard Jack Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Stensrud R P Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Swartzbaugh A E Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3396733-6 Page 34 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1975 Tutini John Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Waddell W C Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Witter R C Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Yacht Norjac Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Zdenek Frank Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 Amanda Edw E Pacific Telephone Blue Dolphin Yacht Pacific Telephone Bruce Marguerite L Pacific Telephone Brumley Donaldson Co Blue Dolphin Pacific Telephone Yacht Canning Jas F Pacific Telephone Carlson Wm D Pacific Telephone Darby Willedd O Pacific Telephone Doheny E L Pacific Telephone Gearon Jos H Pacific Telephone Green R L Pacific Telephone Haughton Irene K Mrs Pacific Telephone Holland Georgia O Pacific Telephone Howe Ruby Pacific Telephone Hundley Bernard S Pacific Telephone Johnson Sidney Pacific Telephone Kirsten W m Jas Pacific Telephone Kress Don H Pacific Telephone Kress Jayne Pacific Telephone Lido Trailer Park Pacific Telephone Mc Farland Blanche Pacific Telephone Miller Albert J Pacific Telephone Peters C Kolb Pacific Telephone Rennie John S Pacific Telephone Richman Matthew Pacific Telephone Roberts E M Pacific Telephone Robinson Dewar Pacific Telephone Scott Alton E Dr Pacific Telephone Scott Phil H Pacific Telephone Skaggs Rae Pacific Telephone Van Sant L S Pacific Telephone Wohl Kent Gregory Pacific Telephone 3396733-6 Page 35 rFINDINGS C 711 LIDO PARK DR Year Uses Source 1995 Godel Wm H Pacific Bell Hamm William L Pacific Bell Harlan Hugh Pacific Bell Mandel Leonard Pacific Bell Moana Community Association Pacific Bell Olsen Theodore E Pacific Bell 1986 Anderson Reg L Col Pacific Bell Border Sam Pacific Bell DAmbrogio J Malcolm Pacific Bell Edgar Vaughan L Pacific Bell Godel Wm H Pacific Bell Harlan Hugh Pacific Bell Hill Robt A Pacific Bell Hoffman Kenneth C Pacific Bell Lane Richard Pacific Bell Lofland J Pacific Bell Lofland Jas E Pacific Bell Mandel Leonard Pacific Bell Olsen Theodore E Pacific Bell 1980 Anderson Reg L Col Pacific Telephone Border Sam Pacific Telephone DAmbrogio J Malcolm Pacific Telephone Edgar Vaughan L Pacific Telephone Godel Wm H Pacific Telephone Hoffman Kenneth C Pacific Telephone Hoffman Kenneth H Pacific Telephone Lane Richard Pacific Telephone Itoiand rena Pacific Telephone Mandel Leonard Pacific Telephone 1975 Border Sam Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. DAmbrogio J Malcolm Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Edgar Vaughan L Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Kingsley John B Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Kruwell Everett L Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Lane Richard Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Sharp Allan N Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Taylor Gilbert Paul Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3396733-6 Page 36 Year Uses 1975 Williams Lew A 1966 Berkheiser Anna Bratt John M Caruso Shirley J Deiley Don L Dolan Michael H Edgar Vaughan L English Olive M Freebairn J Ray Dr Gulledge H W Sharp Allan N Stevens Robt C 717 LIDO PARK DR FINDINGS Source Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Year Uses Source 1995 Bear Flag Pacific Bell Chuck Hovey Yachts Pacific Bell Coombe John M atty Pacific Bell Flem Ing A C Pacific Bell Holt Brian Pacific Bell Hovey Brian & Charilsse Pacific Bell HOVEY CHUCK YACHTS Pacific Bell Irvin Wm W Pacific Bell Iseli Mary Jane Pacific Bell Jones George Hamilton M A I rl est apprsr Pacific Bell Lee Todd Pacific Bell Lido Peninsula Co Pacific Bell Marvich M Pacific Bell Naftzger Roy E Jr Pacific Bell Pinkerton Don Pacific Bell Secret J Nicholas Pacific Bell 1986 Allebom Rohl Pacific Bell Anderson W m Pacific Bell Baseline Property Company Pacific Bell Brewer C Pacific Bell Brown Ray Pacific Bell Chuck Hovey Yachts Pacific Bell COOMBE JOHN M atty Pacific Bell CurciTumer Co Pacific Bell 3396733-6 Page 37 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 Doheny Edw L Pacific Bell Ehrhart Geo Pacific Bell Eldredge Dirk C Pacific Bell Field Sad Pacific Bell Ford Michael A Pacific Bell Freeman Perry H Pacific Bell Hair W m A Jr Pacific Bell Hovey Chuck Yachts Pacific Bell Interlude Michael V Pacific Bell BS E U MARYJAN E Pacific Bell Johnson J R Pacific Bell Jones George Hamilton r est apprsr Pacific Bell Jones J P UI Pacific Bell LIDO YACHT AN CHORAGE Pacific Bell Lunebaugh Sim Pacific Bell Manley Bill L Pacific Bell Naftzger Pauline Pacific Bell Naftzger Roy E Jr Pacific Bell Palmer L Pacific Bell Pension Properties Trust Pacific Bell Roski Ed Pacific Bell Slingsby E Keith Pacific Bell 1980 Ashton Doug & Debbie Pacific Telephone BAS E LIN E DE VE LOPME N T CORP Pacific Telephone Bettencourt Oliver & Jeanne Pacific Telephone Caldwell Associates Pacific Telephone Chutick Jack Pacific Telephone CURCI TURN E R CO Pacific Telephone Curtis Arthur E Pacific Telephone Curtis Arthur E Lido Yacht Anchorage Pacific Telephone I Daheny Edw L Pacific Telephone Durham Larry Pacific Telephone irart so Pacific Telephone Ford Michael A Pacific Telephone Freeman Perry Pacific Telephone Girard Gary Pacific Telephone Girard Geo H Pacific Telephone Horowitz Harold Pacific Telephone 3396733-6 Page 38 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 Horowitz Harry Carbon Canyon Rd Pacific Telephone @Chino@ IS E U MARY JAN E yacht brkr Pacific Telephone Jonls Geo Hamilton apprsr Pacific Telephone Li do Canvas Pacific Telephone Lido Park Development Pacific Telephone UD AH AN CHOAGE Pacific Telephone LIDO YACHT & S HIP BROKE RAGE Pacific Telephone Mc Nally T T Pacific Telephone Meredith Craig Pacific Telephone Metcalf Miles Pacific Telephone Naltzger Pauline Pacific Telephone Naftzcger Roy E Jr Pacific Telephone Nolan Michael Pacific Telephone Yacht Pacific Telephone Snow Gordon H Pacific Telephone Val vistt Estates Pacific Telephone Watson Wm E Pacific Telephone 1975 BASELINE DEVELOPMENT CORP Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Caldwell Associates Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. CURCI BROTHERS Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. CURCI TURNER CO Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Curtis Arthur E Lido Yacht Anchorage Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Dauley Jay Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Davis Peter Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Delta Pacific Supply Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Dewes Norman H Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Ducharme Gerry Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Ehrhart G W Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Gallon Anne Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Gallon Dale B Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Hamilton Jerry Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Horowitz Harold Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. ISELI MARY JANE Michaud Iseli Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Lido Canvas Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. LIDO YACHT ANCHORAGE Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. MacAnnan Ronald R Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Mages David Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. McMahon Frank Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3396733-6 Page 39 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1975 Michaud George Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. MICHAUD ISELI INC Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Naftzger Pauline Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Naftzger Roy E Jr Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Yacht Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Paulson A L Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Pfeifer J A Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Pylant John Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Simley R T Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Slingsby S D Ph D & Associates Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Snow Gordon H Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Spreen Bob Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 900 LIDO PARK DR Year Uses Source 1986 Arts Landing Pacific Bell LIDO YACHT & S HIP BROKE RAGE Pacific Bell Arts Landing Outboard Shop Pacific Bell 1980 LIDO S HIPYARD Pacific Telephone Wilbo Industries Pacific Telephone 1975 Johnson Rubber Co Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. LIDO SHIPYARD Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Wilbo Electronics Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 M A N PACIFIC diesel engns Pacific Telephone LIDO PARK DR N 711 LIDO PARK DR N Year Uses Source 1980 Kingsley John B Pacific Telephone LIDO PARK DRIVE S 710 LIDO PARK DRIVE S you Uses Source 1980 Craig H C Pacific Telephone S LAVBACK IL S E RVICE E RVICE I Pacific Telephone Slaybac Js T Pacific Telephone 3396733-6 Page 40 LIDO SOLID 3209 LIDO SOLD Year Uses 1991 EPISCOPAL CHURCH ST JAMES ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF 1986 NEWPORT BEACH 1986 S T JAME S E PIS COPAL CHURCH OF N E W PORT BE ACH 1980 S T JAME S E PI S COPAL CHURCH 1975 St James Episcopal Church 1955 St James Day School 1955 St James Episcopal Church 3300 LIDO SOLID Year Uses 1991 Lido Sailing Club Main Ofc 1986 Main Ofc 1980 Scheduling Service Main Ofc 3303 LIDO SOLD Year Uses 1991 Sunday School First Church 1986 First Church Of Christ Scientist Sunday School First Church 1980 First Church Of Christ Scientist 1975 Sunday School First Church 1955 First Church of Christ Scientist 3308 LIDO SOLID Year Uses 1980 Blonic Ear Corp 3312 LIDO SOLID Year Uses 1991 Stringfellow J B 1986 Gnrsamore Greg FINDINGS Source Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Telephone Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. So ur Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Source Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Telephone Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Source Pacific Telephone Source Pacific Bell Pacific Bell 3396733-6 Page 41 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 Stnngfellow J B Pacific Bell 1980 Hale Wm E Pacific Telephone 1980 Grisamore Gary Pacific Telephone 1975 Marshall Wanda Pacific Telephone 1975 Hof B Kent Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Ginter Douglas L Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Clark Garry O Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3314 LIDO SOLD Year Uses Source 1986 Gothard Heidi Pacific Bell Gothard Barbara V Pacific Bell 1980 Winale Barbara V Pacific Telephone Gothard John Pacific Telephone Gothard Heidi Pacific Telephone 3315 LIDO SOLD Year Uses Source 1991 Reading Room Pacific Bell 1986 Reading Room Pacific Bell 1980 Ricatiini Room Pacific Telephone Christian Science Monitor Special Pacific Telephone Features Chrlstrlan Science Monitor Newspaper Pacific Telephone Subscriptions 1975 Reading Room Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1955 Reading Room The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 3316 LIDO SOLD Year Uses Source 1980 Clark Frank L & Constance H Pacific Telephone 1975 Foster Saml J Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3318 LIDO SOLD Year Uses Source 1986 Nyqutst Fred Pacific Bell Mills K C Pacific Bell 1980 Mills K C Pacific Telephone 1975 Nyquist Fred Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Mills K C Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3396733-6 Page 42 FINDINGS 3322 LIDO SOLD Year Uses Source 1980 Kennicott Wm N Pacific Telephone Kennie LL @Huntington Beach@ Pacific Telephone 3324 LIDO SOLD Year Uses Source 1980 Thomas G Pacific Telephone 3330 LIDO SOLD Year Uses Source 1975 Phillips John S Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3336 LIDO SOLD Year Uses Source 1991 Apiece For Nails Pacific Bell Avery & Co Pacific Bell Bonner Richard Pacific Bell De La Laza Arthur attp Pacific Bell Lonergan James D Pacific Bell Mc Elroy Jeffrey Pacific Bell Phoenix Cookies Pacific Bell Phoenix Cookies Distributor No Charge To Pacific Bell Caging Party Place For Nails A Pacific Bell Seed David Pacific Bell 1986 Avery & Cc Pacific Bell Blakslee B C Pacific Bell Chnstoper JoeNewport Beach Pacific Bell ACTIVITIES IN CORPORATE D Pacific Bell Arrangements Unlimited Inc Pacific Bell Gourmet Properties Pacific Bell Gourmet Properties incorporated Pacific Bell Invader Cruises Pacific Bell Miller Kathy Pacific Bell Partners & Co Pacific Bell 1980 Angeles Corportion Pacific Telephone Avery & Co Pacific Telephone Avery D Pacific Telephone Blakslee B C Pacific Telephone Blalack C Pacific Telephone 3396733-6 Page 43 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 Browns Roger Via Lido Realty Pacific Telephone Eiliott DW Pacific Telephone Evans Brian Pacific Telephone Susan Spiritus Gallery Pacific Telephone 1975 Avery & Co Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Blakslee B C Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Brittingham Realty Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Dorothy Sawyer Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Elliott D W Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Jordan Leslie L Mrs Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Warmington H W Mrs Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Weber Arthur B Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1955 Blair Walter E The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Callahan Lester The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Kalof S J The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Kendall Henry E Mrs The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Maggie Photography The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 3355 LIDO SOLD Year Uses source 1991 Executive Protocol International Pacific Bell Fox & Associates momt cnslts Pacific Bell Grand Banks Yachts Ltd Pacific Bell Grand Business Services Pacific Bell Greeley Louise S Mrs chr sci pr Pacific Bell Hall & Malone Marine Insurance Brokers Pacific Bell Hampden Papers Inc Pacific Bell Hanson Scott ftie art Pacific Bell Hanson Scott D Modern Painting & Pacific Bell Sculpture Hanson Scott J Pacific Bell Harris Dan E ins Pacific Bell Hartwell Construction Pacific Bell Homi Mary Public Relations Pacific Bell Homick G Pacific Bell Horizons Advertising & Public Relations Pacific Bell Executive Office Kunze Maret OMD L Ac Pacific Bell Lido Building Pacific Bell Lido Mailbox The Pacific Bell 3396733-6 Page 44 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1991 Lido Secretarial Service Pacific Bell LONG LIFE MEDICAL CLINIC INC Pacific Bell Longyear W D Co Pacific Bell Newport International Prolects Cc Inc Pacific Bell Newport International Travel Pacific Bell Newport Intertrade Cc Pacific Bell Newport Investigations Pacific Bell Parker Helene C RN Ph D Pacific Bell Randall Frank Pacific Bell Shepherd Foundation Marie Thatcher Pacific Bell Soderling Ronald E & Associates Pacific Bell Telephone Management Corporation Pacific Bell V N INietwork Communications Pacific Bell Ads & Images Pacific Bell Baker James Astrologer Pacific Bell Bedall & Associates Pacific Bell Big Time Licensing Pacific Bell CALIFORNIAN MENS HAIR DESIGNS Pacific Bell Certified Yachting Adventures Pacific Bell Dozorsky W atty Pacific Bell 1986 Adventures At Sea Inc Pacific Bell Alexander Oil Company Pacific Bell Atlantis Research Foundation Pacific Bell BS C International Inc Pacific Bell Baker James Astrologer Pacific Bell Blue Magic Corp Pacific Bell Boureston Development Pacific Bell Bray Uinc B Terminals Pacific Bell Broadcast Post Pacific Bell Calico Cutting For Kids bty sin Pacific Bell California Beach Restaurant Pacific Bell CAUFORN IAN ME NS HAIR DE S IGN S Pacific Bell Chapman David Pacific Bell Cruising World Magazine Pacific Bell Dave Markus Executive Search Pacific Bell DI BIAS I DE S IGN Pacific Bell Dozorsky W atty Pacific Bell Freeman Robin MA Pacific Bell 3396733-6 Page 45 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 Harris Dan E ins Pacific Bell Helens Velvet Hanger Pacific Bell Homi Mary Public Relations Pacific Bell International Oil & Gas Pacific Bell Joseph Marc any Pacific Bell Lido Building Pacific Bell Longyear W D Cc Pacific Bell Markus Dave Executive Search Pacific Bell Mooney Cc The Pacific Bell Mooney John A Co Pacific Bell Newport International Projects Co Inc Pacific Bell Randall Frank Pacific Bell Resco Development Pacific Bell Resco Financial Pacific Bell Samaritan Counseling Center Of St James Pacific Bell Episcopal Church S IMPLY US Pacific Bell Soderling Ronald E & Associates Pacific Bell 1980 Alexander Oil Compaiy Pacific Telephone Armstrong Petroleum Corporation Pacific Telephone Baker James astrigr Pacific Telephone I Baker Jas A Pacific Telephone Blue Dolphin Restaurant Pacific Telephone Bryan Parke E Pacific Telephone BRYAN PUBLICATIONS IN C Pacific Telephone Calico Cutting For Kids bty s In Pacific Telephone Chaffee Toogood Pacific Telephone Provident Oil Company Pacific Telephone Schnider i Peter Chr Sci Pr Pacific Telephone Secretarial Service In lido Pacific Telephone Sher Joseph HCo Pacific Telephone Travel Gard Pacific Telephone Walker Lee ri est Pacific Telephone Walker Robert & Associates Pacific Telephone Want Training Center Inc Pacific Telephone Wise HS &Associates Ins Pacific Telephone I Collins Milton P CPA Pacific Telephone Community Church Of The Pacific Pacific Telephone Continental Associates Pacific Telephone 3396733-6 Page 46 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 Continental Assurance Company Pacific Telephone Continental Athletic South Inc Pacific Telephone Follis Forbas & Associates Pacific Telephone Greenstripe Media Inc Pacific Telephone Groeningt Hans G Pacific Telephone Helens Velvet Hanger Pacific Telephone Home Buyers Guide Pacific Telephone Home Buyers Guide Real Estate Inc Pacific Telephone nd Pacific Telephone P R International Inc Pacific Telephone Lido Bulding Pacific Telephone Id O Newport Co Pacific Telephone Longyar Willis D Pacific Telephone Mathews Muhleman & Me Lean Pacific Telephone ME DIA MARKE TIN G & AFFILIATE S Pacific Telephone I Mooney John A Co Pacific Telephone Orange Coast Investments Pacific Telephone Playsure Magazine Pacific Telephone Provident Oil Co Pacific Telephone 1975 Alexander Oil Company Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. ARCHI TEKTON INC Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Blue Dolphin Restaurant Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Clapet William C Joiner Fleetwood B Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. pinng architecture Collins Milton P CPA Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Franklin Life Insurance Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Geer Wally Profit Builders Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Groaning Hans G Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Helens Velvet Hanger Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Home Buyers Guide Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Homebuyers Guide Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. HUBERT TED & ASSOCIATES rl est Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. International Marine Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Jean L Klafs ASID Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Joiner Fleetwood B Clapet William C Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. pinng architecture Klafs Jean Interiors Of Lido ASID Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Koistra Joseph C rl est brkr Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Lido Barber Shop Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3396733-6 Page 47 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1975 Lido Building Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Lido Shaving Mug Barber Shop Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Mayer Peter M Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. MEDIA MARKETING & AFFILIATES Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Mission Financial Services Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Mission Mobile Homes Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Profit Builders Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. QUINTARD REALTY Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Renes Lido Shaving Mug Barber Shop Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Ringel Phil Profit Builders Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Shaving Mug Barber Shop The Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Souk Gallery Jean Klafs Interiors Of Lido Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. NSID The Real Estate Co Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Voss Corporation The Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Voyagers Yacht Club Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Walker Gib Realty Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3363 LIDO SOUD Year Uses Source 1991 Miguel Don Pacific Bell 1986 Miguel Don Pacific Bell Don Miguel Pacific Bell 1980 Newport Beach Pacific Telephone Newport Beach Pacific Telephone 1975 Newport Beach Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Newport Beach Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3366 LIDO SOUD Year Uses Source 1991 oiaarmet Properties Pacific Bell Goermet Properties Incorporated Pacific Bell Gcermet Selections Pacific Bell Newport Beach Pacific Bell Activities Incorporated Pacific Bell Arrangements Unlimited Inc Pacific Bell feumeet Properties Pacific Bell 1986 Newport Beach Pacific Bell 1980 i Newport Beach Pacific Telephone 3396733-6 Page 48 FINDINGS Year Uses 1980 Loans Source Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Source Pacific Bell Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Source Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Source Pacific Bell Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3396733-6 Page 49 Savings Lido Insurance Agency Inc 1975 TIFFANYS PRIVATE CLUB & DISCOTHEQUE Newport Beach Lido Insurance Agency Inc Lido Isle Ofc 1955 Ofc Balboa Newport Savings & Loan Assn Ofc Kerstetter Edwin E Lido Escrow Service See Newport Balboa Savings and Loan Association Lido Insurance Agency Inc Main Ofc Palmer P A Newport Balboa Savings & Loan Assn 3369 LIDO SOLD Year Uses 1991 ILLUSIONS 1980 Creative Images JOHN S OLO CRE ATIVE IMAGE S CREATIVE INK LITHOGRAP@Huntington Beach@ RS IN C 1975 Lido Carriage Trade Coiffures 3375 LIDO SOLD Year Uses 1975 Lido Interiors 3377 LIDO SOLD Year Uses 1986 LIDO RE ALTY 1980 Lido LIDO S AILIN G CLUB UDO RE ALTY 1975 LIDO REALTY INC Source Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Source Pacific Bell Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Source Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Source Pacific Bell Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3396733-6 Page 49 FINDINGS 3388 LIDO SOLD Year Uses Source 1991 Hair Surgical Institute A Medical Clinic Pacific Bell New West Pacific Bell New West Communicatons Pacific Bell Nines Newport Beach Pacific Bell Chugay Cosmetic Surgery Institute Pacific Bell Lido Village Oc Pacific Bell Sparkuhl Konstantin MD Pacific Bell Bookkeeping Pacific Bell Marine Financing Pacific Bell 1986 Balboa Pacific Yacht Charter & Mgt Pacific Bell Caldwell Vicki RE Pacific Bell Lido Village Ofc Pacific Bell Marine Financing Pacific Bell Daleco Research & Development Inc Pacific Bell Hair Surgical Institute A Medical Clinic Pacific Bell Parker Dale & Co Inc Pacific Bell Sparkuhl Konstantin MD Pacific Bell 1980 Brazier lumber Co Pacific Telephone From @Los Angeles@ Telephones Call Pacific Telephone Lido Village Of D Pacific Telephone Marine Financing Pacific Telephone Hair Surgical Institute A Medical Clinic Pacific Telephone Market Builders Inc Pacific Telephone Nolterleke Gary L Stegall Parke & Guptill Pacific Telephone Inc tega Jas W CPA Pacific Telephone Wilburn Donald M Stegall Parke & Guptill Pacific Telephone Inc 3400 LIDO SOLD Year Uses Source 1991 PORT O CALL PASADENA Pacific Bell 1986 PAS ADE N A Pacific Bell 1975 Port O Call Pasadena Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1955 Lido Realty Associates The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Buck W O Incorporated The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 3396733-6 Page 50 FINDINGS 3404 LIDO SOLD Year Uses Source 1991 Lido Travel Pacific Bell 1986 Lido Travel Ski Tours Inc Pacific Bell Lido Travel Pacific Bell Clarke Theodore F dntst Pacific Bell 1980 1 Clarke Theodore F dntst Pacific Telephone boroty Sthrove Agency Pacific Telephone Lido Travel Service Pacific Telephone Our Little Miss Beauty & Talent Pageant Pacific Telephone 1975 Ryckoff Paul Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Academy Of Languages Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. HARBOR TRAVEL Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Clarke Theodore F dntst Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3406 LIDO SOLD Year Uses Source 1991 Gtrgory Gary Pacific Bell Gregoy Gallery The Pacific Bell 1980 FE RNS LIN GE RIE Pacific Telephone 3410 LIDO SOLD Year Uses Source 1986 Shoe Tree The Pacific Bell HE RMANS S HOE TRE E Pacific Bell 1980 Shoe Tree Pacific Telephone 1975 The Shoe Tree Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Shoe Tree The Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1955 Rules of Calif shoes The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 3412 LIDO SOLD Year Uses Source 1991 La Patou Pacific Bell 1986 Howes BDO Son Pacific Bell 1980 Howes B D & Son Pacific Telephone 1975 Howes B D & Son Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1955 Shaddocks Inc wearng apprl The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 3415 LIDO SOLD Year Uses Source 1980 Newport Beach Pacific Telephone 3396733-6 Page 51 3416 LIDO SOLD Year 1991 Wii` 1980 1975 1955 Uses Incentive Inc HARBOR TRAVEL Dieyer & Young Brown AWColnc Reed Peyton & Co Dreyer ft Young Beach Type Brown A W Cc Inc RICH PE TE R L DR optmtrst American Welding & Mfg Co The Of Warren Ohio Dreygr Cc rnfts agt Rich Peter L Or optmtrst American Welding & Mfg Co The Of Warren Ohio Dreyer Cc mfrs agt LAWSON HOWARD JR realtor Lido Travel Service Lido Travel Service ROSE OPTICAL Shack H Michael OD Something Natural hair styling Bookcase Congdon J N DDS Davis Karl Lynn Davis & Penney attys Davis & Penney attys Du Pont Francis I & Co brkrs Fulkerson Blanche intr decrtr Gerhardt Studio Penney Geo Davis & Penney attys Penney Jas F Davis & Penney attys Penney John C Davis & Penney attys Plumb Hugh J Jr MD Rileys Jim Jewelry & Watch Repair Lido Ofc FINDINGS Source Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 3396733-6 Page 52 rFINDINGS 3417 LIDO SOLID Year Uses Source 1991 ZIGGYS OPTICAL Pacific Bell 1980 Optical Fashion Center Pacific Telephone 3418 LIDO SOLID Year Uses Source 1991 Olga For Kids Pacific Bell Duong Cathy Lee Pacific Bell Magic Nails Pacific Bell 1986 Grosss Lido Florist Pacific Bell Lido Florist Pacific Bell 1980 Gene Burton appri Pacific Telephone LAW S ON HOW ARD JR realtor Pacific Telephone Lawson Realty Co Pacific Telephone Lawson Howard Jr realtor Pacific Telephone 1975 Gene Burton apprl Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3419 LIDO SOLD Year Uses Source 1991 Chadwell John TJr Pacific Bell Public Reaction Pacific Bell Maruerig to Holub Interiors Pacific Bell Telex Mail Boxes Etc USA Pacific Bell 1986 A Kline Chocolatier Pacific Bell 1980 Friends Again Pacific Telephone 3420 LIDO SOLID Year Uses Source 1991 Christels Etc Pacific Bell 3421 LIDO SOLID Year Uses Sourcy 1991 Le Midi French Country Cuisine Pacific Bell 1986 LE MIDI FRE N CH COON TRY LUIS IN Pacific Bell E Midi Le French Country Cuisine restrnt Pacific Bell 1980 Chez Lautrec Pacific Telephone 3396733-6 Page 53 3422 LIDO SOLD Year Uses 1991 Ultracuts Ultratan 3423 LIDO SOLD Year Uses 1991 Z Pizza 1986 Friends And Company 1980 Garden The womens apprl MALAGA 500 MALAGA Year Uses 1955 Sun Investment Co Mason John S intr decrtr Malaga Imports La Reins Berlu Water Cc Card Construction Co Inc Creighton Don Malaga Imports Daniel Lorraine La Reine Oblatt Julius archt 502 MALAGA Year Uses 1955 Tohill G E Dr phy & sur Boyd Edw A Or orthdntst Willis H B K phys & surg OPORTO 3378 OPORTO Year Uses 1986 Broadcast Productions 1980 Palmer P A Incorporated Ofc FINDINGS Source Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Source Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Telephone Source The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Source The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Source Pacific Bell Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone 3396733-6 Page 54 FINDINGS 3400 OPORTO Year Uses Source 1991 Colco Investment Co Pacific Bell Hope Gallery The Pacific Bell Pace Yachts Newport Beach Pacific Bell Pacemaker Yachts Newport Beach Pacific Bell Sportfishers Unlimited Pacific Bell Wind Works Pacific Bell Windward Sailing Club Pacific Bell 1986 Colco Corp Pacific Bell Dans Un Jardin Pacific Bell De La Loza Arthur Pacific Bell DE VE RE UXS LTD Pacific Bell Jersey West Yacht Sales inc Pacific Bell Newport Bay Chapel Pacific Bell Nord Yachts Pacific Bell 1980 De La Loza Arthur atty Pacific Telephone DE VE RE UXS LTD Pacific Telephone Deverich E Pacific Telephone Deverich Jay & Robin Pacific Telephone Kamata Pearls Pacific Telephone Kona Marine Pacific Telephone Macy Jewelry Importers Pacific Telephone Nord Yachts Pacific Telephone Nord Yachts Recreational Equipment Cc Pacific Telephone POBox 37 @Buena Park@ S Richardsons Sport Fisher Sales Pacific Telephone Tradewind Yachts Pacific Telephone Trans Oceanic Yacht Sales Pacific Telephone W ndward Sailing Club Pacific Telephone 1975 JuliAn designfreedom stonewr Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Laguna Originals Gallery Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Windward Sailing Club Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Devereux For Lilly Pulitzer Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. JADE HOUSE Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3404 OPORTO Year Uses Source 1991 D IDesign Pacific Bell Cosby Gallery The Pacific Bell 3396733-6 Page 55 Year Uses 1985 Stirling Marine Services Martin Donald B MD Pacific West Yachts Stickler Harry E MD Bright Star Yachts Ltd Boxes NBows Uses Babson Marine Enterprises 1980 Pappagallo Shop BLACKMAN LTD jwlrs Newport Yacht Exchange 1975 Valiant Yachts Lido Greek Seek The Unique Mr Taco Yogurt Connection Pappagallo Shop Stone George A California Leisure Boating Club BLACKMAN LTDjwlrs LIDO VILLAGE NAIL CORNER 1955 Seibert Walter H Mr Salsa Yogurt Connection Holstein Susan Mrs 3405 OPORTO Year Uses 1955 Martin Donald B MD Stickler Harry E MD 3408 OPORTO Year Uses 1991 Wood Dennis & Associates BLACKMAN LTD jwlrs King Harbor Yacht Sales Lido Greek Mr Taco Yogurt Connection Stone George A 1986 BLACKMAN LTDjwlrs International Hot Dog Company Mr Salsa Yogurt Connection Nordic Yacht Brokerage Of Calif North Star Yachts Sportfishers Unlimited 1980 Babson Marine Enterprises BLACKMAN LTD jwirs International Hot bog Company Newport Sound FINDINGS Source Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Source The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Source Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone 3396733-6 Page 56 Year Uses 1980 Newport Sports Car Leasing 3100 W Coast Hwy @Newport Beach@ United Yacht Brokers Valiant Yacht Sales Yogurt Connection 1975 Bailey Mike BLACKMAN LTDjwlrs EURAUTO Jasmin Len Maddox C Richard Needleport NEWPORT BEACH HAIR & CO Newport Hair & Co Ricci Cs 1955 Calhoun O H oil oprtr Hewitt Fred E Lido Arms Apts & Marina Pinson P C Mrs Stever M R FINDINGS Source Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 3412 OPORTO Year Uses Source 1991 Carver Yachts Pacific Bell Newport Beach Pacific Bell Irvine Coast Charters Pacific Bell Lillie Casual Pacific Bell Newport Yacht Exchange Inc Pacific Bell Newport Yachts Pacific Bell Offshore Yachts Pacific Bell Voyager Marine[ Inc Pacific Bell 1986 Carver Yachts Pacific Bell Newport Beach Pacific Bell Newport Yacht Exchange Inc Pacific Bell 1980 Bryant Ellen eictrlgst Pacific Telephone Burris Corporation Pacific Telephone I Dollys Shop For Children Pacific Telephone DON MIGUE L Pacific Telephone Miguel Don Pacific Telephone umes Of Lido Pacific Telephone 3396733-6 Page 57 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 Stephen Ross Salon For Hair Pacific Telephone 1975 Blodgett & Associates Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Bryant Ellen Electrologist Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Buds Beauty Salon See Martinique Salon Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Of Beauty Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. German Home Bakery Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Lemons Us Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Martinique Salon Of Beauty Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Petti Quilt Junction Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Renees House Of Jewels Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Turquoise Tee Pee Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3415 OPORTO Year Uses 1991 Allen Wertz Candies corporate offices Pacific Bell 1986 Gamones Pacific Bell 1975 Gimones Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Gimones Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3416 OPORTO Year Uses Source 1991 Paolo Giardini For Men Pacific Bell MARDO JEWELRY Pacific Bell Luigis Waterfront Deli Pacific Bell Jewelry By Mardo Pacific Bell Image Marketing Consultants Pacific Bell 1986 Luigis Waterfron Deli Pacific Bell ME D PRO Pacific Bell Newport Partners Pacific Bell Paolo Giardini For Men Pacific Bell RAMCO Pacific Bell South Pacific Gourmet Foods Pacific Bell 1980 a JE W E LRY BY MARDO Pacific Telephone Baxter Davis & Dunn Pacific Telephone Luigis Waterfront Dell Pacific Telephone Mitchell James A & Associates Pacific Telephone Sea Treasures shells Pacific Telephone 1975 Ann Douglass Custom Dressmaking Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Childrens Shop The Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3396733-6 Page 58 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1975 Douglas Ann Custom Dressmaking Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Douglass Ann Custom Dressmaking Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Garden The teenage apparel Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Newport Beach Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Sea Treasures shells Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. SIMPLY US Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1955 Lido Arms Marina The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. San Chez Belmont The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 3420 OPORTO Year Uses Source 1991 Georges Camelot Restaurant Pacific Bell Indigo Advertising Design Pacific Bell Pacific Coast Yacht Sales Pacific Bell Yacht Connection Pacific Bell 1986 Camelot Georges Restaurant Pacific Bell Georges Camelot Restaurant Pacific Bell Lido Marina Village Leasing Pacific Bell Lido Village Leasing Pacific Bell Sales Ofc Pacific Bell 1980 Lido Marina Village Leasing Pacific Telephone Ldo Village Leasing Pacific Telephone Salmones Victor Inc art galry Pacific Telephone Newporter Inn Beauty Salon 3 Pacific Telephone Newport Yachts Pacific Telephone Newport Yacht Management Pacific Telephone Newport Yacht Charters Pacific Telephone N E W PORT YACHT CHARTE RS Pacific Telephone 1975 A Little Intrigue Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Birds Eye View Gallery Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Little Intrigue A Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. NEWPORT YACHT CHARTERS Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Serenity skin care Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Yard Arm Fabric Boutique Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1955 Ofc The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Gardner J D The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Vincent Jos Herbert Dr The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 3396733-6 Page 59 FINDINGS 3421 OPORTO Year Uses Source 1991 Lido Village Leasing Pacific Bell 1986 Intercomex Intl Inc invstmnts Pacific Bell 1975 Miner James M MD Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Peckham Guyton Inc archts Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3424 OPORTO Year Uses Source 1991 A MG Bookkeeping Services Pacific Bell BEVAN Group The Pacific Bell HATTERAS OF CALIFORNIA Pacific Bell JEM Pacific Bell Lido Book Shoppe Pacific Bell Overseas Yachts Pacific Bell Venture Care Associates Pacific Bell 1986 Admiral Yacht Charters Pacific Bell Admiral Yachts Corporate Charters Pacific Bell Coughlin Norman L Co Pacific Bell HATTE RAS OF CALIFORN IA Pacific Bell Lido Book Shoppe Pacific Bell MICHAE LS Pacific Bell Skipper Yachts Of Newport Beach Pacific Bell 1980 Bobs Angels Pacific Telephone Cruising World Magazine Pacific Telephone Lido Book Shoppe Pacific Telephone Skiper Yacht Sales Pacific Telephone Skiiperette 507 B W Edinger Av @Santa Pacific Telephone Ana@ A Tracys Dress Shop Pacific Telephone 1975 Paddlecraft boats Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Rohrs Bill Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Rossi Vernon J Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Surridge Robt C Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Walters Ed Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. After Sale Products Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Arendsen Associates Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Arnold Richard A Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Art Commodities Internatl Corporation Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Newport Sailing Club Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3396733-6 Page 60 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1975 Mr Earth Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. MC INTOSH DUNCAN CO Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. McIntosh Duncan yacht brkr Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Lido Book Shoppe Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Hauxhurst Lawrence Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Hatteras Of California Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. DUNCAN MC INTOSH CO Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Burger King Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Art Packaging & Programing Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Burger John W Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3425 OPORTO Year Uses Source 1975 Newport Beach Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3431 OPORTO Year Uses Source 1991 Art Dimension Gallery Lido Pacific Bell Newman art gallry Pacific Bell Lido Brass & Copper Inc Pacific Bell Mostly Muffins Pacific Bell 1986 Anne Bruse Of Sweden Pacific Bell Art Dimension Gallery Pacific Bell Chocolatene Gudrun Of Belgium Pacific Bell Lido Brass & Copper Pacific Bell 3432 OPORTO Year Uses Source 1991 Pagliacci Pacific Bell Pagliacco Turning & Milling Pacific Bell Paglial K Pacific Bell Rubel Jas L Jr atty Pacific Bell Newport Sailing Club & Academy Pacific Bell Newport Sailing Club Pacific Bell Lillie Pacific Bell Avanti Leather Goods Pacific Bell American Maritime Yacht Charters Pacific Bell 1986 Rubel Jas L Jr atty Pacific Bell Newport Sailing Club & Academy Pacific Bell 3396733-6 Page 61 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 Newport Sailing Club Pacific Bell Hampden Papers Inc NewportBalboa Development Inc Pacific Bell Pacific Bell N ATU RAL ARTS Pacific Bell Sculpture Caroselis Of Newport Beach Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Annettes Place Pacific Bell 1980 Aries Pacific yacht sales Pacific Telephone Pacific Bell W E S TS IDE BUILDIN G MATE RIAL Pacific Telephone CORP Customer Service Pacific Telephone Cruising Center Sales Facility Pacific Telephone Annettes Place Pacific Telephone I Arrangements Unlimited Inc Pacific Telephone Newport Sailing Academy Pacific Telephone Newport Sailing Club Pacific Telephone 1975 Rubel Jas L Jr atty Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Patouche womens apprl Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Anything Goes Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Sigrun Studio china paintng Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Cruising Center Sales Facility Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. OPORTO E 3424 OPORTO E Year Uses Source 1980 Howelts Colin Pacific Telephone Via Lido 3355 Via Lido Year Uses Source 1991 Harris Dan E ins Pacific Bell Hampden Papers Inc Pacific Bell Hanson Scott ftie art Pacific Bell Hanson Scott D Modern Painting & Pacific Bell Sculpture Hanson Scott J Pacific Bell Hall & Malone Marine Insurance Brokers Pacific Bell LONG LIFE MEDICAL CLINIC INC Pacific Bell Baker James Astrologer Pacific Bell CALIFORNIAN MENS HAIR DESIGNS Pacific Bell 3396733-6 Page 62 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1991 Fox & Associates momt cnslts Pacific Bell Telephone Management Corporation Pacific Bell Bedall & Associates Pacific Bell Certified Yachting Adventures Pacific Bell Hartwell Construction Pacific Bell Homi Mary Public Relations Pacific Bell Homick G Pacific Bell Newport International Prolects Co Inc Pacific Bell Newport International Travel Pacific Bell Newport Intertrade Co Pacific Bell Newport Investigations Pacific Bell Randall Frank Pacific Bell Shepherd Foundation Marie Thatcher Pacific Bell Ads & Images Pacific Bell Big Time Licensing Pacific Bell Dozorsky W atty, Pacific Bell Horizons Advertising & Public Relations Pacific Bell Executive Office Kunze Maret OMD L Ac Pacific Bell Grand Banks Yachts Ltd Pacific Bell Executive Protocol International Pacific Bell Greeley Louise S Mrs chr sci pr Pacific Bell Grand Business Services Pacific Bell Longyear W D Co Pacific Bell Lido Building Pacific Bell Lido Mailbox The Pacific Bell Lido Secretarial Service Pacific Bell Parker Helene C RN Ph D Pacific Bell Soderling Ronald E & Associates Pacific Bell V N INietwork Communications Pacific Bell 1986 Adventures At Sea Inc Pacific Bell Blue Magic Corp Pacific Bell Dozorsky W atty Pacific Bell Homi Mary Public Relations Pacific Bell International Oil & Gas Pacific Bell Lido Building Pacific Bell S IMPLY US Pacific Bell Alexander Oil Company Pacific Bell Broadcast Post Pacific Bell 3396733-6 Page 63 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 Bray Uinc B Terminals Pacific Bell Boureston Development Pacific Bell Mooney Co The Pacific Bell Mooney John A Co Pacific Bell BS C International Inc Pacific Bell Cruising World Magazine Pacific Bell Dave Markus Executive Search Pacific Bell Helens Velvet Hanger Pacific Bell Harris Dan E ins Pacific Bell Joseph Marc any Pacific Bell Samaritan Counseling Center Of St James Pacific Bell Episcopal Church Atlantis Research Foundation Pacific Bell Baker James Astrologer Pacific Bell Calico Cutting For Kids bty sin Pacific Bell California Beach Restaurant Pacific Bell CAUFORN IAN ME NS HAIR DE S IGN S Pacific Bell Freeman Robin MA Pacific Bell Longyear W D Co Pacific Bell Markus Dave Executive Search Pacific Bell Newport International Projects Co Inc Pacific Bell Resco Development Pacific Bell Randall Frank Pacific Bell Chapman David Pacific Bell DI BIAS I DE S IGN Pacific Bell Resco Financial Pacific Bell Soderling Ronald E & Associates Pacific Bell 1980 Alexander Oil Compaiy Pacific Telephone Blue Dolphin Restaurant Pacific Telephone Follis Forbas & Associates Pacific Telephone Helens Velvet Hanger Pacific Telephone P R International Inc Pacific Telephone Sher Joseph HCo Pacific Telephone Armstrong Petroleum Corporation Pacific Telephone Bryan Parke E Pacific Telephone BRYAN PUBLICATIONS IN C Pacific Telephone Continental Associates Pacific Telephone Continental Assurance Company Pacific Telephone Continental Athletic South Inc Pacific Telephone 3396733-6 Page 64 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 1 Collins Milton P CPA Pacific Telephone Community Church Of The Pacific Pacific Telephone Lido Bulding Pacific Telephone Id O Newport Co Pacific Telephone Longyar Willis D Pacific Telephone Orange Coast Investments Pacific Telephone Travel Gard Pacific Telephone Baker James astrigr Pacific Telephone I Baker Jas A Pacific Telephone Home Buyers Guide Pacific Telephone Home Buyers Guide Real Estate Inc Pacific Telephone I Mooney John A Co Pacific Telephone Playsure Magazine Pacific Telephone Calico Cutting For Kids bty s In Pacific Telephone Greenstripe Media Inc Pacific Telephone Groeningt Hans G Pacific Telephone nd Pacific Telephone Provident Oil Co Pacific Telephone Provident Oil Company Pacific Telephone Schnider 1 Peter Chr Sci Pr Pacific Telephone Want Training Center Inc Pacific Telephone Walker Robert & Associates Pacific Telephone Walker Lee ri est Pacific Telephone Wise HS &Associates Ins Pacific Telephone ME DIA MARKE TIN G & AFFILIATE S Pacific Telephone Mathews Muhleman & Me Lean Pacific Telephone Chaffee Toogood Pacific Telephone Secretarial Service In lido Pacific Telephone 1975 Clapet William C Joiner Fleetwood B Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. pinng architecture International Marine Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Klafs Jean Interiors Of Lido ASID Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Lido Barber Shop Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Lido Building Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Lido Shaving Mug Barber Shop Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. MEDIA MARKETING & AFFILIATES Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Voss Corporation The Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Blue Dolphin Restaurant Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Groaning Hans G Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3396733-6 Page 65 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1975 Joiner Fleetwood B Clapet William C Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. pinng architecture General Telephone Co., of California HUBERT TED & ASSOCIATES rl est Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Mission Financial Services Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Mission Mobile Homes Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Alexander Oil Company Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Collins Milton P CPA Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Jean L Klafs ASID Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Profit Builders Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. QUINTARD REALTY Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Shaving Mug Barber Shop The Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. ARCHI TEKTON INC Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Franklin Life Insurance Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Helens Velvet Hanger Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Koistra Joseph C rl est brkr Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Mayer Peter M Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Renes Lido Shaving Mug Barber Shop Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Rings] Phil Profit Builders Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Souk Gallery Jean Klafs Interiors Of Lido Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. NSID The Real Estate Co Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Walker Gib Realty Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Geer Wally Profit Builders Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Home Buyers Guide Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Homebuyers Guide Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Voyagers Yacht Club Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. VIA OPORTO 3378 VIA OPORTO Year Uses Source 1970 Riley Jim Jewelry & Watch Repair General Telephone Co., of California Rileys Jim Jewelry & Watch Repair General Telephone Co., of California 3400 VIA OPORTO Year Uses Source 1970 Cadwalader Kay S General Telephone Co., of California Logan Rose C General Telephone Co., of California Stuart Marshall General Telephone Co., of California Thomas Glen W General Telephone Co., of California 3396733-6 Page 66 3404 VIA OPORTO Year Uses 1970 Cronshey G H 3408 VIA OPORTO Year Uses 1970 Belyea Jack L Roddick Eric M Kruwell Everett L French Gerald 3411 VIA OPORTO Year Uses 1970 Waremington Win C 3412 VIA OPORTO Year Uses 1970 Flikeid D K 3415 VIA OPORTO Year Uses 1970 Gimones 3416 VIA OPORTO Year Uses 1970 Kress Don H Kress Jayne Mc Cann Fred Elliott D W Harris Robt E 3420 VIA OPORTO Year Uses 1970 Shepardson Helen C Rodheim M R Merrell Wm Lido Yacht Sales Cole Stan Cole Sanford FINDINGS Source General Telephone Co., of California Source General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California Source General Telephone Co., of California Source General Telephone Co., of California Source General Telephone Co., of California Source General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California Source General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California 3396733-6 Page 67 3424 VIA OPORTO Year Uses 1970 Heaney Thos J Jr marine survyr Laby Irving E Dr Newport Sailing Club Surridge Robt C FRASER DAVID yacht brkrs Valterza Louis Blackman Ltd Jwlrs Avery Chuck Sweet Clark Ins 3432 VIA OPORTO Year Uses 1970 Klafs Jean Interiors of Lido NSID KELSO HARRY INC bidrs Kelso Construction Co Jean K Cronshey Geo H Smith & Christensen Real Estate Le and r Garfield MIKES OF LIDO drsmkr Palm Graphics Inc Rubel Jas L Jr atty Souk Gallery Jean Klafs Interiors of Lido NSID Baker Harrison R & Associates rl est apprsrs & consltnts VIA OPORTO W 3404 VIA OPORTO W Year Uses 1970 Mc Farland Douglas B VILLA WAY 3100 VILLA WAY Year Uses 1966 DUKES OF BEVERLY HILLS Poodle grooming FINDINGS Source General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California Source General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California Source General Telephone Co., of California Source Pacific Telephone 3396733-6 Page 68 FINDINGS 3101 VILLA WAY Uses Year Uses Source 2002 XXXX CO Haines Company 1975 Holmes Jeri Fashion Designs Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3103 VILLA WAY Source Year Uses Source 2002 XXXX Haines Company 1986 Janlces Raggedy Arms House Cleaning Pacific Bell 1975 Fulton John A & Associates Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 3105 VILLA WAY Bussey Don F Year Uses Source 2002 WICKSTROM Robert F Haines Company JENNAGROUPINC Haines Company 1995 Newcomb Development Pacific Bell 1986 Dennehy Jerry Pacific Bell 1980 Fan Cies ceiling fans Pacific Telephone 3107 VILLA WAY Year Uses Source 2002 TITUS Steve Haines Company 1986 Joanne Dixon Design Dimensions Pacific Bell Dixon Joanne Design Dimensions Pacific Bell 1980 Coast Financial Pacific Telephone 1975 Mooniers Art Galleria Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 Clemens Paul Pacific Telephone 3109 VILLA WAY Year Uses Source 2002 XXXX Haines Company 1995 Bear Clothing Pacific Bell 3111 VILLA WAY Year Uses Source 2002 XXXX Haines Company 1986 Pacific Coast Typesetting Pacific Bell Creative Network Pacific Bell 1975 Adrians Antiques & Collectables Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 Bussey Don F Pacific Telephone Bay Enterprises Pacific Telephone 3396733-6 Page 69 3115 VILLA WAY Year Uses 2002 SANDINSot 1995 Sandin Scott 1986 Chauvim E 1980 Chauvin E E 1975 Chauvin E E 1966 Perryman Juanita Mrs VILLAGE WAY 3111 VILLAGE WAY Year Uses 1980 S TAIN E D GLAS S W ORKS FINDINGS Source Haines Company Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Telephone Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Pacific Telephone Source Pacific Telephone 3396733-6 Page 70 FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY: ADDRESS NOT IDENTIFIED IN RESEARCH SOURCE The following Target Property addresses were researched for this report, and the addresses were not identified in the research source. Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 3303 Via Lido 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921,1920 ADJOINING PROPERTY: ADDRESSES NOT IDENTIFIED IN RESEARCH SOURCE The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report, and the addresses were not identified in research source. Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 3000 LAFAYETTE ST 2002,2001,1997,1995,1992,1991,1986,1980,1975,1971,1970,1966,1965, 1961,1960,1956,1952,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 3010 LAFAYETTE AVE 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3010 LAFAYETTE DR 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921,1920 3010 LAFAYETTE ST 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921,1920 3012 LAFAYETTE ST 2002,2001,1997,1995, 1992,1991,1986, 1980,1975,1971, 1970,1966,1965, 1961,1960,1956,1955,1952,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921, 1920 3100 VILLA WAY 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922, 1921,1920 3101 VILLA WAY 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921, 1920 3102 LAFAYETTE AVE 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921, 1920 3102 LAFAYETTE DR 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3103 VILLA WAY 2001, 1997,1995,1992, 1991,1980,1971, 1970,1966, 1965, 1961,1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3105 VILLA WAY 2001,1997,1992,1991,1975,1971,1970,1966,1965,1961,1960,1956,1955, 1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 3107 VILLA WAY 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 3109 VILLA WAY 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 3111 VILLA WAY 2001,1997,1995,1992,1991,1980,1971,1970,1965,1961,1960,1956,1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3111 VILLAGE WAY 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922, 1921,1920 3112 LAFAYETTE ST 2002,2001,1997,1995, 1992,1991, 1986, 1980,1975,1971, 1970,1966,1965, 1961,1960,1956,1952,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921.,1920 3115 VILLA WAY 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3209 LIDO SOLID 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 3300 LIDO SOLD 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3303 LIDO SOLD 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3308 LIDO SOLD 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3312 LIDO SOLD 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3314 LIDO SOLD 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921, 1920 3315 LIDO SOLD 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3316 LIDO SOLD 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921, 1920 3318 LIDO SOLD 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3322 LIDO SOLD 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922, 1921,1920 3324 LIDO NORD 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921,1920 3324 LIDO SOLD 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922, 1921,1920 3330 LIDO SOLD 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922, 1921,1920 3336 LIDO NORD 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921, 1920 3336 LIDO SOLD 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 3355 LIDO SOLD 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 3355 Via Lido 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3363 LIDO SOLID 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 3366 LIDO SOLID 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 3369 LIDO SOLID 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3375 LIDO SOLID 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922, 1921,1920 3377 LIDO SOLID 2002,2001,1997,1995,1992,1991,1971,1970,1966,1965,1961,1960,1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3378 OPORTO 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921, 1920 3378 VIA OPORTO 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3388 LIDO NORD 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921,1920 3388 LIDO SOLID 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3400 LIDO SOLID 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 3400 OPORTO 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 3400 VIA OPORTO 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921,1920 3404 LIDO NORD 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922, 1921, 1920 3404 LIDO SOLID 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 3404 OPORTO 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 3404 VIA OPORTO 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921,1920 3404 VIA OPORTO W 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922, 1921,1920 3405 OPORTO 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921,1920 3406 LIDO SOLID 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 3408 OPORTO 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3408 VIA OPORTO 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922, 1921,1920 3410 LIDO SOLID 2002,2001,1997,1995,1992,1991,1971,1970,1966,1965,1961,1960,1956, 1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 3411 VIA OPORTO 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921,1920 3412 LIDO SOLID 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3412 OPORTO 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3412 VIA OPORTO 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922, 1921,1920 3415 LIDO SOLID 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921,1920 3415 OPORTO 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 3415 VIA OPORTO 2002,2001,1997,1995,1992,1991,1986,1980,1975,1971,1966,1965,1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3416 LIDO NORD 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921, 1920 3416 LIDO SOLID 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3416 OPORTO 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3416 VIA OPORTO 2002,2001,1997,1995,1992,1991,1986,1980,1975,1971,1966,1965,1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3417 LIDO SOLID 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921, 1920 3418 LIDO SOLID 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3419 LIDO SOLID 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3420 LIDO SOLID 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3420 OPORTO 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3420 VIA OPORTO 2002,2001,1997,1995,1992,1991,1986,1980,1975,1971,1966,1965,1961, 1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 3421 LIDO SOLID 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3421 OPORTO 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 3422 LIDO SOLID 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922, 1921,1920 3423 LIDO SOLID 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3424 OPORTO 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 3424 OPORTO E 2002,2001,1997,1995,1992,1991,1986,1975,1971,1970,1966,1965,1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3424 VIA OPORTO 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922, 1921,1920 3425 OPORTO 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921,1920 3431 OPORTO 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921, 1920 3432 OPORTO 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 3432 VIA OPORTO 2002,2001,1997,1995, 1992,1991,1986, 1980,1975, 1971, 1966,1965,1961, 1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922, 1921,1920 475 32ND 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921,1920 475 32ND ST 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 500 31ST 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921,1920 500 31ST ST 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 500 MALAGA 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921,1920 501 31ST 2002,2001,1997,1992, 1986,1980,1975, 1971,1970, 1966, 1965,1961,1960, 1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921, 1920 501 31 ST ST 2001, 1997, 1992, 1980, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 502 31ST 2002,2001,1997,1995, 1992,1991,1986, 1975,1971,1970,1966,1965,1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921,1920 502 31ST ST 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 502 MALAGA 2002,2001,1997,1995,1992,1991,1986,1980,1975,1971,1970,1966,1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 503 31ST ST 2001,1997,1995,1992, 1986,1980,1975, 1971,1970, 1966, 1965,1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 503 32ND 2002,2001,1997,1992, 1991, 1986,1980, 1975,1971,1970, 1966,1965,1961, 1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922, 1921, 1920 503 32ND ST 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 504 31ST 2002,2001,1997,1995, 1992,1991,1975, 1971,1970,1966, 1965,1961,1960, 1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921, 1920 504 31ST ST 2002,2001,1997,1995, 1992,1991,1980, 1975,1971,1970, 1966,1965, 1961, 1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922, 1921,1920 505 31ST 2002,2001,1997,1995,1992,1991,1975,1971,1970,1966,1965,1961.,1960, 1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921, 1920 505 31ST ST 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 505 32ND 2002,2001,1997,1995, 1992,1991, 1986, 1975,1971, 1970, 1966,1965, 1961, 1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922, 1921,1920 505 32ND ST 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1980, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 506 31ST 2002,2001,1997,1992, 1991,1980,1975, 1971,1966, 1965, 1961,1960,1956, 1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 50631ST ST 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 508 31ST 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921, 1920 508 31ST ST 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 509 31ST 2002,2001,1997,1992, 1991,1986,1975, 1971,1970, 1966, 1965,1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 509 31ST ST 2001,1997,1992,1980,1975,1971,1966,1965,1961,1960,1956,1955,1952, 1950, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 510 31ST 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 510 31ST ST 2001, 1997,1992,1986, 1980,1971, 1965, 1961,1960,1956, 1952,1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 511 31ST ST 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 512 31ST ST 2002,2001,1997,1995, 1992,1980,1971, 1970,1965, 1961, 1960,1956,1952, 1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 521 31ST ST 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 530 32ND 2002,2001,1997,1995, 1992,1986,1980, 1975,1971,1970, 1966,1965,1961, 1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922, 700 LIDO PARK DR 1921,1920 530 32ND ST 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 701 LIDO PARK DR 1955,1952,1950,1948,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 534 32ND ST 2002,2001,1997,1995, 1992,1991, 1986, 1980,1975,1971, 1970,1966,1965, 710 LIDO PARK DR 1961,1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922, 1921, 1920 53630TH ST 2002,2001,1997,1995, 1992,1991, 1986, 1975,1971, 1970, 1966,1965, 1961, 1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922, 1921,1920 589 31ST ST 2002,2001,1997,1995, 1992,1986,1980, 1975,1971, 1970, 1966,1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921,1920 601 LIDO PARK DR 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 611 LIDO PARK DR 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 615 LIDO PARK DR 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922, 1921,1920 617 LIDO PARK DR 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 621 LIDO PARK DR 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 630 LIDO PARK DR 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 631 LIDO PARK DR 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 632 LIDO PARK DR 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 633 LIDO PARK DR 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 634 LIDO PARK DR 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921, 1920 640 LIDO PARK DR 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922, 1921, 1920 700 LIDO PARK DR 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 701 LIDO PARK DR 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 710 LIDO PARK DR 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 710 LIDO PARK DRIVE S 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922, 1921,1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 711 LIDO PARK DR 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 711 LIDO PARK DR N 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960,1956,1955,1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922, 1921,1920 717 LIDO PARK DR 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952,1950,1946,1945,1941,1936,1930,1926,1925,1922,1921,1920 900 LIDO PARK DR 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 Proposed Townhomes 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA 92663 Inquiry Number: 3396733.5 August 27, 2012 440 Wheelers Farms Road Milford, CT 06461 rEDROEnvironmental Data Resources Inc 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR's professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo perdecade. When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. ema This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report AS IS. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2012 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. Date EDR Searched Historical Sources: Aerial Photography August 27, 2012 Target Property: 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA 92663 Year Scale Details Source 1938 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=555' Flight Year: 1938 Laval 1947 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 "=666' Flight Year: 1947 Fairchild 1953 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 "=666' Flight Year: 1953 Pacific Air 1968 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=480' Flight Year: 1968 Teledyne 1977 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 "=666' Flight Year: 1977 Teledyne 1995 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 "=500' /Composite DOQQ - acquisition dates: 1995 EDR 1998 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=666' Flight Year: 1998 USGS 2005 Aerial Photograph. Scale: l"=500' Flight Year: 2005 EDR 3396733.5 2 4' PC `_ L JN r u ` L 'k�,p ii MIM ti L� V ` i � M1f$c r '. t :.. . `'..v 1 •L ems., as wr q �Mae Appendix E: Regulatory Records Documentation finymAr -ft Information p ®To Build On Engineering • Consulting • Testing TELEPHONE / COMMUNICATIONS SUMMARY NAME: Palc DATE: TIME: PROJECT NO: S7—P-77 PROJECT NAME: AM PM TYPE: Telephone Call ❑ Meeting PERSON(S) OF CONTACT: TITLE: COMPANY: GLrvj } Ny��° I� (1j oL ��. P`a ✓� %i o, Ft.� %%�T TELEPHONE NO: YY f — 6 yy – 3� o �/ SUBJECT: u Sr ^� G�w�t� ria �- G✓ ��� PSI REP: ❑ Spoke Directly With ❑ Left Voice Mail Message SUBJECT/INSTRUCTIONS: O& 140raff %%y'a��/ , yYi — &YY —3,,os— ACTIONS: DISTRIBUTION: A-300-2 MAILING ADDRESS: COUNTY OF ORANGE 1241 E. DYER ROAD STE.120 HEALTH CARE AGENCY SANTA ANA, CA 92702 TELEPHONE: (714) 433-6000 FAX: (714) 433-6424 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH www.ochealthinfo.com/regulatory/environ.htm REQUEST FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RECORDS The undersigned hereby requests a copy of the records prepared and maintained by the Health Care Agency in the ordinary course of business, at or near the time of the act, condition, or event which they depict. The records requested are maintained under the Public Records Act Government Code § 6250 — 6276.48. Some information held in the documents may be exempt from release pursuant to the Public Records Act. The undersigned understands that the Health Care Agency will charge $0.15 per page copied. In the case of a request for a large number of copies, the Health Care Agency may provide the requestor an estimate of copy costs prior to making said copies. If any request is to be canceled, this office must be notified at the above number within ten (10) days of receipt of request, otherwise cost incurred will be charged to the undersigned. In order toassist you, please describe the reason for your request: / Please list addresses here (no more than 10 addresses per request): 330 Vrk LidvI Al",0„� jA. Lw - 3.3 Via LIQ /U.ew®P•� Check here if you would like a review only or to review before copies are made O SIGNATURE of Requester PRINT Name of Requester (and Company Name - if applicable) PRINT Street Address PRINT City, State and Zip Code Area Code and Phone Number Date RECORDS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN PICKED UP WITHIN 60 DAYS OF NOTIFICATION WILL BE DESTROYED F042-09.1347 (Rev. 11/06) Page 2 of 3 MAILING ADDRESS: COUNTY OF ORANGE 1241 E. DYER ROAD STE. 120 HEALTH CARE AGENCY SANTA ANA, CA 92702 TELEPHONE: (714) 4336000 FAX: (714) 4336424 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH www.ochealthinfo.com/regulatory/environ.htm HAZARDOUS WASTE / OTHER PROGRAM INFORMATION CHECKLIST Please check only the records you need. This will enable us to search only the actual files that pertain to your request, cutting down time spent on searching for records that you may not want. Site Specific Information tT Above Ground Petroleum Storage Tank File ❑ California Accidental Release Prevention Program File mac'" Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) records ❑ City of Brea Hazardous Materials Business Plan File Complaints regarding Hazardous Waste or Underground Storage Tank Facility Hazardous Waste Generator Facility File �— Hazardous Waste Industrial Cleanup Site File Hazardous Waste Spill Response Log (Emergency Incidents Log) Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Site File ❑ Medical Waste Facility Record ❑ Proposition 65 Notification ❑ Recycling Program ❑ Solid Waste Facility File (large files — need to be specific) ❑ Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) File ❑ Tiered Permit Facility File -T Underground Storage Tank File ❑ Water Quality Information on Environmental Health Website www.ochealth List of Hazardous Waste Generator Facilities (HWFACILITIES.SRW) List of Industrial Cleanup Sites (IC PROGRAM CASES BY CITY.SRW) List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities (usTFACILITIES.SRW) A list of Solid Waste landfills (which includes closed landfills) can be obtained through the Other information: F042-09.1347 (Rev. 11/06) Page 3 of 3 Appendix F: Interview Documentation Phase I ESA Newport Beach, California Z-` > ��•f��` 7� � June 14, 2012 PSI Proposal 559-71885 p f.iL; USER QUESTIONNAIRE 1 OF 2 Pursuant to, ASTM E 1527-05 Appendix X.3, in order to qualify for one of the Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs) offered by the Small Business Liability relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2001 (the "Brewnfields Amendments), the user must provide the following information (if available) to the environmental professional. Failure to provide the information could result in a determination that "all appropriate inquiry" is not complete This form represents a type of interview and as such, the user has an obligation to answer all questions in good faith, to the extent of his or her actual knowledge. Are you aware of any environmental cleanup Gens against the property that are filed or recorded under federal, tribal, state or local law? WNo [ '; Yes It yes, please explain. 2. Are you aware of any activity and land use limitations (AULs), such as engineering controls, land use restrictions or institutional controls that are in place at the site and/or have been fled or recorded in a e istry under federal; tribal. state, or local law? No L! Yes If yes, please explain 3- As the user of this ESP, do you have any specialized knowledge ar experience related to the property or nearby properties? For example, are you involved in the same line of business as the current cr former occupants of the property or an adjoining property so that you would have specialized knowledge of the chemicals and processes used by this type of business? No L Yes If yes, please expiain. Does the purchase price being paid for this property reasonably reflect the fair market value of the property? If you conclude that mare is a difference, have you considered whether the lower purchase price is because contamination is known or believed to be preseni at the property? '54jo LI Yes If yes, please explain_ 5. Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property that would help the environmental professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases? For example, as user_ (a) Do you know of the past uses of the property?, (b) Do you know J specific chemicals that are present or were once present at the property?, (c) Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the property?, (d) Be you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property? ON o L Yes If yes, please explain_ e As the user of this ESA, based on your knowledge and experience related to the property are there any obvious indicators that point, to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property? ONo ❑ Yes If yes, please explain. Phase I ESA Proposal Newport Beach, California PSI Proposal 559-71885 s June 14, 2012 Proceedings involving the Property Pursuant to ASTM E 1527-05 §10.9, as the user of this ESA do you know of (1) any pending, threatened, or past litigation relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the property, (2) any pending, threatened, or past administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the property. and (3) any notices from any governmental entity regarding any possible violation of environmental laws or possible liability relating to hazardous su stances or petroleum products? No [I Yes If yes, please explain. Helpful Documents Checklist Pursuant to ASTM E 1527-05 §10.8, de you know whether any of the following documents exist related to the subject property, and if so, whether copies can and will be provided to PSI for review? Check all that apply. Environmental site assessment reports Environmental compliance audit reports EJ Environmental permits (for example solid waste disposal permits, hazardous waste disposal permits, wastewater permits, NPDES permits, underground injection permits) Registrations for above or underground storage tanks Registration for underground Injection systems [] Material safety data sheets Community right -to -know plan Risk assessments [j Safety plans; preparedness and prevention pians, spill prevention, countermeasure and control (SPCC) plans. etc [� Reports regarding hydrogeologic conditions on the property or surrounding area �] Notices er other correspondence from any governmental agency relating to past or current violations of environmental laws with respect to the property or relating to environmental liens encumbering the property [ Hazardous waste generation notices or reports Geotechnical studies F1 Recorded activity and land use limitations (AUI-s) Name (authorized User Representative) J / slgfir2 ure- f/ rifle D21C �— Please return this form along with the signed and completed Proposal Authorization rS Payment Instructions and Contact Information forms, all of which are a part of this proposal, to PSI as your authonzation to begin work on this project Phase 1 ESA Proposal Newport Beach, California PSI Proposal 559-71885 i M-111AM-10214 June 14, 2012 Please provide contact information for the parties below (if known) and return to PSI along with the signed and completed Proposal Authorization & Payment Instructions and User Questionnaire. PRIMARY USER) CONTACT SECONDARY USER CONTACT (if any) Name Name Address Address city/statelzip ! ` CitylSiatelZp / R Phone Fhone CURRENT OWNER KEY SITE MANAGER s Name Name Address Address t / Cityl$tatelzip Citylstatelzip Phone Phone CURRENT FACILITY OPERATCDR. PAST OWNER :'R OPERATOR 6 Namc 'name Address Address city/siatelzip city/stztelzip Phone Phone OTHER PARTIES LIKELY TO HAVE MATERIAL INFORMATION REGARDING PROPERTY Nam, Name Address Address Cirylstaie/zip city/St2telziip Phone Phone R USER QUES-110,NNAIRE I OF 2 t, r nxIire �fd� i V /X1 - i c 1 e I Ing r �� F� � f, Tend E0 �W S�"! �nmwsLardVvWf vnd hmsaaRn RaSY20w5AW of NO Ame"MOTS, me N I l DOOR we fmaNrg W�A WQmvv 7 4 Vh w it, '0 !Y- r0maral Fznvs n orojm ME sfolranon VD-cid 't-Urt U,:ifln cv[ uH j a not a mp ve Aw nn' 'OIOnMnn a oTp & _, �,, _i trje, a fIas !--, Z-� ier'-A q'; .-] mW 41, m in e"W 1, rp 1 A, CCU, >pLaloy , t, r nxIire �fd� i V /X1 USER I QUES3 -f-IONNARE 2 CF 2 she Propery to 07 -Ow 010 0 05 in um ESA A Pc a" 1- n"Sun , usw"es pEwde.m orpium m ICU lN pr DPO'n 2r pay "gal" ...... V sr pv, wwv�sva"on rrw�ecng, wevart 10 jaZardcbs yonmrne. 121 in; nncew Sm any fi , � �cm 1I�� ,t1wAry aq ramb AMH f %A�CYWW 15ZO or ZISIE0 S" IV pfu! rF CONTACTINFORMATION SHEET Z DMITARY USER CONIAW SECC—,NL),,r,' USEF, r !If 'WRON1 WAN p KEY ME la- L�-Piv-t) 4 -2 AN j/ c SONE? Q;HFP PARMS 1 !"?AVE VATPR A AFORMAPON PWARDN" .QP F" Appendix G: Data Gap Worksheet Project Name: Newport Beach Townhomes DATA GAP WORKSHEET Project Number: 0559771 /_MM041111, Requirement Status Data Gap SDG* Category ¢ o c Description of Data Gap Activity Z iiNone U User Responsibilities User Knowledge and Information ® ❑ Environmental Lien ® Eland AUL Information Environmental Records Review Standard ® El Records Source Information Discretionary El ElLocal environmental record information Physical Setting Source Standard ® El Setting Information Additional El ® El Setting Record Information Historical Records Review Property History Identified to 1940 E ❑ Property History Identified first Developed Use ® ❑ Surrounding Property History Information E ❑ Site Reconnaissance Observations: ® El of the Subject Property Observations: E] ® E]Interior of the Subject Property Current and Past Uses of the Subject Property E ❑ ��� Page 1 of 2 Project Name: Newport Beach Townhomes DATA GAP WORKSHEET Project Number: 0559771 /_MM0411111 Site Reconnaissance (cont.) N/A c I Other Sources of Information SDG* Observations: ® ❑ Adjoining Property Current and Past Uses of the Adjoining Property ® ❑ Uses of the Surrounding Property ® ❑ Interviews (with...) Current Owner or ® El Key Site Manager Non -Residential El ® El Occupants Occupants with operations El ® El to indicate RECs Past owners, operators, and occupants ❑ ❑ If subject property abandoned or vacant, ® El El or occupants of neighboring properties State or local government official ❑ Comments and Explanations SDG = Significant Data Gaps. List Identified SDGs in Section 1.1 of the Report �^�� j Page 2 of 2 Appendix H: Personnel Qualifications Information . ��ToBuiidon Professional Service Industries, Inc. All Appropriate Inquiries Environmental Professional Eric Fraske Meets the education, training, and experience requirements as set forth in 40 CFR §312.10 March 23, 2012 Chief Technical Officer I1�% J VaMiveas�ry V ->>nC�<L"�p hf a��naiian to gpdd Eric C. Fraske, PE Geotechnical and Environmental Department Manager, Cypress, California Education Bachelor of Science: Major -Civil Engineering Michigan State University: May 2004 Certifications/Registrations/Technical Training State of California Registered Civil Engineer (PE #76976) Nevada Certified Environmental Manager (CEM # 2134) 40 Hour HAZWOPER Professional Experience Mr. Fraske is the department manager for the geotechnical and environmental group of the Cypress, California office of PSI. As department manager, Mr. Fraske oversees all environmental and geotechnical projects. His responsibilities include coordinating personnel and equipment resources to ensure client satisfaction. Mr. Fraske is closely involved with clients, potential clients, and projects in order to form strong alliances and long lasting working relationships. His work involves extensive client contact, program quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC), and liaison with federal, state, and local regulatory agencies. Prior to joining PSI, Mr. Fraske worked as a field technician for an air quality firm from 2002 to 2004. As a field technician, his work experience included ambient air sampling, gas emissions testing, pollution modeling, compliance demonstrations, TRIS, report development, and industrial air permitting. Project Experience Mr. Fraske has conducted many Phase I ESAs for commercial lenders, local and nationwide banks, and real-estate developers. Transactions included mergers and acquisitions, and refinancing. Representative Phase I Environmental Site Assessments Project Experience • Over 50 Proposed CVS Locations Throughout Southern California • Proposed NFL Stadium Locations, Southern California • Sony Pictures Studios, Culver City, California Kodak Theater and Hollywood and Highland Retail Complex, Hollywood, California • Proposed Extra Space Self Storage Facilities, Throughout Southern California • FDIC Portfolio Locations, Throughout Arizona • Pacific Gateway Industrial Center, Torrance, California • 60,000 Acres of Timberland in South Georgia • 6,000 Acre Former Cattle Farm, Bleckley County, Georgia • Five Volvo Equipment Dealerships, Savannah, Macon, Marietta, Atlanta, and Augusta, Georgia • Various Fiber Optic Cable Sites, Marietta, Georgia 0 Multiple Burger King Restaurants, New York, New York Mr. Fraske has performed Phase II Subsurface Investigations and a variety of subsurface investigations for commercial lenders, state environmental protection agencies, and private individuals at several commercial and industrial real estate properties. Representative Phase II Environmental Site Assessments and Site Investigation Project Experience • Mira Mar Naval Air Station, San Diego, California • Former Gasoline Station, Compton, California • Active Sugar Mill, Clewiston, Florida • 300 Square Mile Agricultural Land Acquisition, South Florida • Plating Facility, West Hollywood, California • Former Western Brass Manufacturing Facility, Los Angeles, California • Former Dry Cleaner, Garden Grove, California • Former Auto Dealership, Manhattan Beach, California • Former Nike Missile Site, Rancho Palos Verdes, California • Former Wastewater Treatment Plant, Fort Oglethorpe, Georgia • 6,000 Acre Former Cattle Farm, Bleckley County, Georgia • Three former gasoline stations, Savannah, Georgia Mr. Fraske has conducted soil excavations, groundwater sampling, operations and maintenance of total fluids free product recovery systems and soil vapor extraction systems, well surveys, well development, groundwater sampling and effluent sampling of treated groundwater on several impacted properties. Representative Remediation Project Experience • Former Gasoline Station, Culver City California • Former Dry Cleaner, Garden Grove, California • Former Dry Cleaner, Montclair, California • Former Plating Facility, West Hollywood, California • Former Technicolor Studio, Hollywood, California • Oil Spill, Fontana, California • Former Auto Dealership, Manhattan Beach, California • 6,000 Acre Former Cattle Farm, Bleckley County, Georgia • Former Wastewater Treatment Plant, Fort Oglethorpe, Georgia • Emory Northlake Medical Center, Tucker, Georgia, • Peachtree Mitsubishi, Doraville, Georgia Years experience with other firms: 2 Year started with PSI: 2004 Lloyd D. Guss, PG Lloyd D. Guss, PG Senior Geologist, Long Beach, California Years with PSI: 51/2 Years experience with other firms: 131/2 Education B.Sc. in Geology, California State University, Long Beach, 1992 Certifications/Registrations/Technical Training California Registered Professional Geologist (No. 7034) Colorado State Environmental Scientist registration (No. 5618) Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Workshop, PSI (1999) Professional Certificate in UST Leak Detection Standards and Systems, University of California, Riverside (1994) OSHA 29 CFR 1910.120 HAZWOPER, worker Professional Experience For about nineteen years, Mr. Goss has been involved with all aspects of quality project work for environmental and hazardous waste site investigations, risk management, and remediation activities. His responsibilities have included: project management, technical project oversight, project administration and budgeting, upholding company safety standards, regulatory agency liaison, managing and training personnel, data evaluation, and reporting. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Project Experience Mr. Guss has over eight years of experience providing services to Caltrans under various environmental related contracts. Services have included emergency response, UST removals, hazardous waste management, soil and groundwater assessments, and aerial deposited lead investigations throughout California. Projects have included property acquisition investigations, lead studies of bridge paint and right-of-way soil, and high profile drinking water assessments. Mr. Goss maintains a good working relationship with numerous contract managers at several Caltrans district offices throughout California. Petroleum Hydrocarbon Project Experience As Team Leader and Project Manager for environmental work at two major Los Angeles refineries, Mr. Goss was responsible for: a high profile groundwater investigation of Los Angeles aquifers (Gage, Lynwood, and Silverado), an LNAPL recovery optimization program to expand product recovery systems, oversight of air sparge and vapor extraction systems, remedial excavation of approximately 1,000 tons of California Hazardous Waste and reporting to the DTSC, and submitting routine deliverables to the CRWQCB and AQMD. Landfill Project Experience Mr. Goss managed a biologically sensitive military landfill remediation/restoration project, which involved the excavation of over 30,000 tons of dioxins, furans, and lead impacted soil. In addition, his team was responsible for initiating a re -profiling program so that soil could be separated and transported to the appropriate waste disposal facility, which resulted in a substantial cost saving for the client. Not only was the project completed under budget, but it was also completed on schedule. Chlorinated Solvent Project Experience Mr. Goss has managed a number of chlorinated solvent projects ranging from small dry cleaning facilities to a large chemical company tank farm located in the Port of Los Angeles. r �; Information KA .To Build On Engineering • Consulting • Testing One Company One Call May 24, 2013 Mr. Justin Park Project Manager The Wieland-Davco Corporation 4162 English Oak Drive Lansing, Michigan 48911 Email: Justin.park((Dwieland-davco.com Phone: 517-372-8650 Re: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Commercial Property 3303 and 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, California PSI Project Number: 0559951 Professional Services Industries (PSI) is pleased to report our findings of the Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) conducted at the abovementioned subject property. This assessment was conducted in general accordance with PSI proposal number 559-92657r and Wieland-Davco change order number 002-07, dated May 22, 2013. Below is a summary of our project understanding, field activities, laboratory analyses, and conclusions and recommendations. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING In August of 2012, PSI conducted a review of a previous environmental assessment conducted at the subject property. PSI's review identified the following evidence of a recognized environmental condition at the subject property. • The northwest adjoining property is developed with a dry cleaner; and according to personnel, dry cleaning is performed on-site. Based on the inherent environmental risk associated with this type of business, the adjacent dry cleaner is considered to represent a recognized environmental condition (REC) in connection with the subject property. PSI recommended that a Phase II ESA be conducted to determine if the subject property has been negatively impacted from the previously mentioned recognized environmental condition. Professional Service Industries, Inc. • 6330 Gateway Drive, Suite B • Cypress, CA 90630 • Phone 714/484-8600 • Fax 714/484-8601 191:44e7_COI1y/1111*1 Drilling and sampling operations were directed by a PSI field supervisor, and all field personnel were OSHA trained in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.120. Prior to subsurface drilling activities, PSI notified utility service alert in accordance with local practices. Equipment decontamination, sample collection, field documentation, sample custody, and laboratory analyses were performed in general accordance with methods prescribed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Preliminary Activities and Geophysical Survey Prior to the start of fieldwork, PSI conducted a site walk to mark proposed boring locations and prepared a Health and Safety Plan. PSI notified Underground Service Alert (USA) at least 48 -hours prior to any fieldwork to identify underground public utilities in the vicinity of the site. Additionally, PSI contracted a private geophysical survey firm to survey the parking lot of the subject property to independently clear the boring locations. Sampling Activities Direct -push drilling equipment, operated by Strongarm Environmental Field Services of Norwalk, California, was used to collect soil vapor, soil, and groundwater samples from three boring locations (131, B2, and 133) in the northwest portion of the property along the property line (see attached figure). Soil vapor samples were collected from a depth of four feet below ground surface (ftbgs), soil samples were collected from 5 ftbgs, and groundwater was collected from approximately 7 ftbgs in each boring. All samples were placed in a cooler for transport to the laboratory under chain of custody protocol. All soil samples were observed for lithology and screened in the field using a photoionization detector (PID); soil boring logs are attached for reference. The soils at the subject property were observed to primarily consist of a mixture of beach sands and silty sands. Groundwater was encountered at approximately 7 ftbgs in each boring. Based on field observations and PID readings, one sample from each boring was selected for laboratory analysis. Following completion of soil and groundwater sampling, a soil vapor probe was installed at each of the soil boring locations. All probes were installed at a depth of approximately 4 ftbgs. PSI collected a soil vapor sample at each location using a tedlar bag and vacuum box. Following completion of all sampling activities, all boring locations were backfilled with hydrated bentonite chips and resurfaced to match existing conditions. LABORATORY ANALYSIS Soil vapor, soil, and groundwater samples were analyzed by Calscience Environmental Laboratories, Inc. of Garden Grove, California. Soil vapor samples were analyzed for chlorinated solvents using USEPA Method TO -15. Selected soil samples and groundwater samples were analyzed for chlorinated solvents by USEPA Method 8260. PSI Project No. 0559951 May 24, 2013 Page 2 of 3 Analytical results indicate that chlorinated solvent concentrations are below the laboratory reporting limits and regulatory limits for all the samples tested. A laboratory report, along with chain of custody documentation, is attached. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Laboratory analyses of the soil vapor, soil, and groundwater samples tested did not detect concentrations of chlorinated solvents above the laboratory reporting limit or regulatory limit. Based on the finding and conclusions presented in this assessment, no further assessment is recommended at this time. STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS AND PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION The information provided in this report prepared by PSI, Project Number 0559951, is intended exclusively for Wieland-Davco as it pertains to the subject property located at 3303 and 3355 Via Lido in Newport Beach, California, at the time and place the activities were conducted. The professional services provided have been performed with the signed project agreement and in accordance with practices generally accepted by other appropriate environmental professionals, geologists, engineers, hydrologists, hydrogeologists, and environmental scientists practicing in this field. No other warranty, either expressed or implied, is made. As with all investigations, there is no guarantee that the work conducted has identified any and all sources or locations of petroleum hydrocarbons or hazardous substances or chemicals. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact us at (714) 484-8600. Respectfully submitted, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Eric Fraske, PE Project Manager Attachments: Figure Boring Logs Laboratory Report Lloyd Guss, PG Principal Consultant PSI Project No. 0559951 May 24, 2013 Page 3 of 3 COMMERCIAL BUILD/NG P A R K I N G COMMERCIAL BUILDING COMMERCIAL BUILDING i KONA CLEANERS A LITTLE TOUCH -3363 OF HEAVEN ILLUSIONS SALON -3369 COLDWELL BANKER -3377 REAL ESTATE P A R K IN G L 0 T LEGEND: - BORING LOCATION +83 (PSI, MAY 22,. 2013) SFR - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE r III B3 COMMERCIAL BUILDING SUBJECT PROPERTY P A R K I N G OFFICE BUILDING 3366 PA RKIN G \\ V SFR SFR SFR G y SFR � SFR O CHURCH MALAGA NEWPORT BACK BAY BOAT DOCKS SIR SFR �PA RKI NG BOAT DOCKS j7/0/1 COMMERCIAL L'HUKL'H BUILDING L FA ROADTT�g ROAD 32nd STREET APPROX"If SO4f 1'= 90' /'��L� Info777tation vrzaccr'uwc. omawry en a>E rtc Ho.: rrcuac Ho.: 9/`��� To Build On COMMERCIAL BUILDING/CHURCH EFD 5/22/13 951-02 �.�w • Co vfthw • Twdny 3303/3355 VIA LIDO 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92663 Ava .en v�r..v.: 6�0 �t ,. DH,,, S.M. a PHASE II cy,R.9,. C.M. b ��o E. F. 0559951 (714) 4 -86W ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PSI Rev. SOIL BORING LOG BORING/PIT NO: B1 SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE: 5/22/2013 PROJECT NAME: Via Lido, Newport Beach Phase II PROJECT NO: 0559951 o co u� I-- = Z :) FID Lj a DESCRIPTION PIDN USCS REMARKS LU o 2 z 3 (PPM) N w d O m 0 Surface: Asphalt uj Vapor probe B1 -SG installed 5 m _ ______ Very _Fine _toFine SAND,_ Lt. _Brown, Loose, _2 ..... .... SP__ at 4ftbgs___________________ Dry, some shell fragments. Groundwater encountered at m 7 feet below ground surface 10 Total_Depth for groundwater screen 10 feet_ Boring terminated at 10 feet Backfilled with bentonite and sealed with asphalt cold patch 15 ----------------------- ------ ------ ------- ----------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- -------------- ------- ------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- 2/95 1 PREPARED BY: Lloyd Guss PSI Rev. SOIL BORING LOG BORING/PIT NO: B2 SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE: 5/22/2013 PROJECT NAME: Via Lido, Newport Beach Phase II PROJECT NO: 0559951 o co u� I-- = Z :) FID Lj a DESCRIPTION PIDN USCS REMARKS LU o 2 z 3 (PPM) N w d O m 0 Surface: Asphalt Vapor probe B2 -SG installed 5_____m N _ ______ Very _Fine _toFine SAND,_ Lt. _Brown, Loose, 0 SP__ at 4ftbgs___________________ Dry, some shell fragments. 3� Groundwater encountered at m 7 feet below ground surface 10 Total_Depth for groundwater screen 10 feet_ Boring terminated at 10 feet Backfilled with bentonite and sealed with asphalt cold patch 15 ----------------------- ------ ------ ------- ----------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- -------------- ------- ------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- 2/95 1 PREPARED BY: Lloyd Guss PSI Rev. SOIL BORING LOG BORING/PIT NO: B3 SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE: 5/22/2013 PROJECT NAME: Via Lido, Newport Beach Phase II PROJECT NO: 0559951 o co u� I-- = Z :) FID Lj a DESCRIPTION PIDN USCS REMARKS LU o 2 z 3 (PPM) N w a O m 0 Surface: Asphalt Vapor probe B3 -SG installed 5 M m _ ______ Very _Fine _toFine SAND,_ Lt. _Brown, Loose, 0 SP__ at 4ftbgs___________________ Dry, some shell fragments. Groundwater encountered at m7 feet below ground surface 10 Total_Depth for groundwater screen 10 feet_ Boring terminated at 10 feet Backfilled with bentonite and sealed with asphalt cold patch 15 ----------------------- ------ ------ ------- ----------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- -------------- ------- ------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- 2/95 1 PREPARED BY: Lloyd Guss iff alscience ii�nvironmental aboratories, Inc. The difference is service ResultLink 1 Email your PM 1 Page 1 of 20 CALSCIENCE WORK ORDER NUMBER: 13-05-1604 AIR I SOIL I WATER I MARINE CHEMISTRY Analytical Report For Client: PSI Client Project Name: Via Lido, Newport Bch. / 559 Attention: Eric Fraske 6330 Gateway Drive, Suite B Cypress, CA 90630-4844 Approved for release on 05/23/2013 by: Kristin Beckley Project Manager lab, Calscience Environmental Laboratories, Inc (Calscience) certifies that the test results provided in this report meet all NELAC requirements for parameters for which accreditation is required or available. Any exceptions to NELAC requirements are noted in the case narrative. The original report of subcontracted analyses, if any, is attached to this report. The results in this report are limited to the sample(s) tested and any reproduction thereof must be made in its entirety. The client or recipient of this report is specifically prohibited from making material changes to said report and, to the extent that such changes are made, Calscience is not responsible, legally or otherwise. The client or recipient agrees to indemnify Calscience for any defense to any litigation which may arise. Page 2 of 20 ralscience n vironmental L aboratories, Inc. Contents Client Project Name: Via Lido, Newport Bch. / 559 Work Order Number: 13-05-1604 1 Work Order Narrative ....................................... 3 2 Sample Summary .......................................... 4 3 Client Sample Data ......................................... 5 3.1 EPA TO -15 (M) Full List (Air) ............................... 5 3.2 EPA 8260B Volatile Organics (Aqueous) ...................... 7 3.3 EPA 8260B Volatile Organics (Soil) .......................... 9 4 Quality Control Sample Data .................................. 11 4.1 MS/MSD............................................. 11 4.2 LCS/LCSD............................................ 13 5 Glossary of Terms and Qualifiers ............................... 17 6 Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt Form .......................... 18 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501 Page 3 of 20 Calscience Work Order Narrative Arjnvironmenta/ Laborator/es, inc. Work Order: 13-05-1604 Page 1 of 1 Condition Upon Receipt. Samples were received under Chain of Custody (COC) on 05/22/13. They were assigned to Work Order 13-05-1604. Unless otherwise noted on the Sample Receiving forms all samples were received in good condition and within the recommended EPA temperature criteria for the methods noted on the COC. The COC and Sample Receiving Documents are integral elements of the analytical report and are presented at the back of the report. Holding Times: All samples were analyzed within prescribed holding times (HT) and/or in accordance with the Calscience Sample Acceptance Policy unless otherwise noted in the analytical report and/or comprehensive case narrative, if required. Any parameter identified in 40CFR Part 136.3 Table II that is designated as "analyze immediately" with an immediate holding time (HT </= 15 minutes--40CFR-136.3 Table II footnote 4), is considered a "field" test and reported samples results are not flagged unless the analysis is performed beyond 24 hours of the time of collection. Quality Control: All quality control parameters (QC) were within established control limits except where noted in the QC summary forms or described further within this report. v `o Additional Comments: U 9 Solid - Unless otherwise indicated, solid sample data is reported on a wet weight basis, not corrected for % moisture. All QC results are always reported on a wet weight basis. Vinyl Chloride exceeded QC criteria for % recovery on the laboratory control spike analysis in batch 1305221-01 on GCMS PP. The % recovery on the laboratory control spike for this analyte was above the upper control limit of 122%. Vinyl chloride met QC criteria for % recovery on the matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate analysis in this batch and was non -detect (ND) for all associated samples. Subcontractor Information: Unless otherwise noted below (or on the subcontract form), no samples were subcontracted. 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501 Qaiscience nvironmental L aboratories, Inc. Client: PSI 6330 Gateway Drive, Suite B Cypress, CA 90630-4844 Attn: Eric Fraske Sample Identification B1-5 Bi -W B1 -SG B2-5 B2 -W B2 -SG B3-5 B3 -W B3 -SG Page 4 of 20 Sample Summary Work Order: 13-05-1604 Project Name: Via Lido, Newport Bch. / 559 PO Number: Date Received: 05/22/13 Lab Number Collection Date and Time Number of Matrix Containers 13-05-1604-1 05/22/13 08:50 1 Soil 13-05-1604-2 05/22/13 09:10 3 Aqueous 13-05-1604-3 05/22/13 10:45 1 Air 13-05-1604-4 05/22/13 09:30 1 Soil 13-05-1604-5 05/22/13 09:45 3 Aqueous 13-05-1604-6 05/22/13 10:50 1 Air 13-05-1604-7 05/22/13 10:05 1 Soil 13-05-1604-8 05/22/13 10:25 3 Aqueous 13-05-1604-9 05/22/13 10:55 1 Air 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501 alscience nvironmental aboratories, Inc. Analytical Report Page 5 of 20 PSI Date Received: 05/22/13 6330 Gateway Drive, Suite B Work Order: 13-05-1604 Cypress, CA 90630-4844 Preparation: N/A 05/22/13 Air Method: EPA TO -15M 2.5 Units: ug/m3 Project: Via Lido, Newport Bch. / 559 2.5 Page 1 of 2 Client Sample Number Lab Sample Date/Time Matrix Instrument Date Date/Time QC Batch ID Number Collected Prepared Analyzed B1 -SG 13-05-1604-3-A 05/22/13 Air GCIMS AA N/A 05/22/13 130522L01 2.5 10:45 ND 16:40 Comment(s): - The method has been modified to use Tedlar Bags instead of Summa canisters and is not NY NELAC accredited. Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 2.5 c-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 2.5 t-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 2.5 Tetrachloroethene ND 8.5 2.5 Trichloroethene ND 6.7 2.5 Vinyl Chloride ND 3.2 2.5 Surrogate 1,4-Bromofl uorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 Toluene -d8 Rec. % Control Limits Qualifiers 102 57-129 116 47-137 102 78-156 B2 -SG 13-05-1604-6-A 05/22/13 Air GC/MS AA NIA 05/22/13 130522L01 107 10:50 100 17:28 Comment(s): - The method has been modified to use Tedlar Bags instead of Summa canisters and is not NY NELAC accredited. Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 32 16 c-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 32 16 t-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 32 16 Tetrachloroethene ND 54 16 Trichloroethene ND 43 16 Vinyl Chloride ND 20 16 Surroaate 1,4-Bromofluo robenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 Toluene -d8 Rec. Control Limits Qualifiers 106 57-129 107 47-137 100 78-156 RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit. 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501 alscience nvironmental aboratories, Inc. Analytical Report Page 6 of 20 PSI Date Received: 05/22/13 6330 Gateway Drive, Suite B Work Order: 13-05-1604 Cypress, CA 90630-4844 Preparation: N/A 05/22/13 Air Method: EPA TO -15M 10 Units: ug/m3 Project: Via Lido, Newport Bch. / 559 10 Page 2 of 2 Client Sample Number Lab Sample Date/Time Matrix Instrument Date Date/Time QC Batch ID Number Collected Prepared Analyzed B3 -SG 13-05-1604-9-A 05/22/13 Air GC1MS AA N/A 05/22/13 130522L61 10 10:55 ND 18:18 Comment(s): - The method has been modified to use Tedlar Bags instead of Summa canisters and is not NY NELAC accredited. Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 20 10 c-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 20 10 t-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 20 10 Tetrachloroethene ND 34 10 Trichloroethene ND 27 10 Vinyl Chloride ND 13 10 Surrogate 1,4-Bromofl uorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 Toluene -d8 Rec. % Control Limits Qualifiers 105 57-129 110 47-137 100 78-156 Method Blank 099-12-981-3019 NIA Air GC/MS AA NIA 05/22/13 130522L01 15:51 Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 2.0 1 c-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 2.0 1 t-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 2.0 1 Tetrachloroethene ND 3.4 1 Trichloroethene ND 2.7 1 Vinyl Chloride ND 1.3 1 Surrogate 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 Toluene -d8 Rec. ° Control Limits Qualifiers 95 57-129 104 47-137 98 78-156 RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit. 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501 aiscience nvironmental aboratories, Inc. Analytical Report Page 7 of 20 PSI Rec. °, Date Received: Qualifiers 05/22/13 6330 Gateway Drive, Suite B 99 Work Order: 13-05-1604 Cypress, CA 90630-4844 99 Preparation: EPA 5030C 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 90 Method: EPA 82608 Toluene -d8 95 Units: ug/L Project: Via Lido, Newport Bch. / 559 Page 1 of 2 Client Sample Number Lab Sample Date/Time Matrix Instrument Date Date/Time QC Batch ID Number Collected 17:54 Prepared Analyzed 131-W 13-05-1604-2-A 05/22/13 Aqueous GC/MS V V 05/22/13 05/22/13 130522L01 ND 09:10 1 17:25 Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 1.0 1 Tetrachloroethene c-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.0 1 Trichloroethene t-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.0 1 Vinyl Chloride Tetrachloroethene ND 1.0 1 Surrogate Trichloroethene ND 1.0 1 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene Vinyl Chloride ND 0.50 1 Dibromofluoromethane Surrogate Rec. °, Control Limits Qualifiers 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene 99 80-120 Dibromofluoromethane 99 80-126 r 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 90 80-134 `o Toluene -d8 95 80-120 0 132-W 11NOW 13-05-1604-5-A 05/22/13 Aqueous GC/MS V V 05/22/13 05/22/13 130522L01 09:45 17:54 Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 1.0 1 c-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.0 1 t-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.0 1 Tetrachloroethene ND 1.0 1 Trichloroethene ND 1.0 1 Vinyl Chloride ND 0.50 1 Surrogate Rec. Control Limits Qualifiers 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene 97 80-120 Dibromofluoromethane 98 80-126 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 86 80-134 Toluene -d8 93 80-120 RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit. 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501 aiscience nvironmental aboratories, Inc. Analytical Report Page 8 of 20 PSI Rec. Date Received: Qualifiers 05/22/13 6330 Gateway Drive, Suite B 98 Work Order: 13-05-1604 Cypress, CA 90630-4844 101 Preparation: EPA 5030C 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 88 Method: EPA 82608 Toluene -d8 96 Units: ug/L Project: Via Lido, Newport Bch. / 559 Page 2 of 2 Client Sample Number Lab Sample Date/Time Matrix Instrument Date Date/Time QC Batch ID Number Collected 12:59 Prepared Analyzed 133-W 13-05-1604-8-A 05/22/13 Aqueous GC/MS V V 05/22/13 05/22/13 130522L01 ND 10:25 1 18:24 Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 1.0 1 Tetrachloroethene c-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.0 1 Trichloroethene t-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.0 1 Vinyl Chloride Tetrachloroethene ND 1.0 1 Surrogate Trichloroethene ND 1.0 1 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene Vinyl Chloride ND 0.50 1 Dibromofluoromethane Surrogate Rec. Control Limits Qualifiers 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene 98 80-120 Dibromofluoromethane 101 80-126 r 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 88 80-134 `o Toluene -d8 96 80-120 0 Method Blank 099-14-001-11019 N/A Aqueous GC/MS V V 05/22/13 05/22/13 130522L01 12:59 Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 1.0 1 c-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.0 1 t-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.0 1 Tetrachloroethene ND 1.0 1 Trichloroethene ND 1.0 1 Vinyl Chloride ND 0.50 1 Surrogate Rec. ° Control Limits Qualifiers 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene 98 80-120 Dibromofluoromethane 89 80-126 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 86 80-134 Toluene -d8 95 80-120 RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit. 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501 RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit. 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501 Page 9 of 20 Qaiscience Analytical Report nvironmental aboratories, Inc. PSI Date Received: 05/22/13 6330 Gateway Drive, Suite B Work Order: 13-05-1604 Cypress, CA 90630-4844 Preparation: EPA 5030C Method: EPA 82608 Units: ug/kg Project: Via Lido, Newport Bch. / 559 Page 1 of 2 Client Sample Number Lab Sample Date/Time Matrix Instrument Date Date/Time QC Batch ID Number Collected Prepared Analyzed B11-5 13-05-1604-1-A 05/22/13 Soil GC/MS PP 05/22/13 05/22113 130522L01 08:50 17:16 Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 1 c-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 1 t-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 1 Tetrachloroethene ND 5.0 1 Trichloroethene ND 5.0 1 Vinyl Chloride ND 5.0 1 Surrogate Rec. °, Control Limits Qualifiers 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene 96 60-132 Dibromofluoromethane 107 63-141 r 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 115 62-146 `o Toluene -d8 99 80-120 0 132-5 13-05-1604-4-A 05/22/13 Soil GC/MS PP 05/22/13 05/22/13 130522L01 09:30 17:44 Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 1 c-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 1 t-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 1 Tetrachloroethene ND 5.0 1 Trichloroethene ND 5.0 1 Vinyl Chloride ND 5.0 1 Surrogate Rec. Control Limits Qualifiers 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene 97 60-132 Dibromofluoromethane 109 63-141 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 116 62-146 Toluene -d8 102 80-120 RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit. 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501 RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit. 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501 Page 10 of 20 Qalscience Analytical Report nvironmental aboratories, Inc. PSI Date Received: 05/22/13 6330 Gateway Drive, Suite B Work Order: 13-05-1604 Cypress, CA 90630-4844 Preparation: EPA 5030C Method: EPA 82608 Units: ug/kg Project: Via Lido, Newport Bch. / 559 Page 2 of 2 Client Sample Number Lab Sample Date/Time Matrix Instrument Date Date/Time QC Batch ID Number Collected Prepared Analyzed B3-5 13-05-1604-7-A 05/22/13 Soil GC/MS PP 05/22/13 05/22/13 130522L01 10:05 18:12 Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 1 c-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 1 t-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 1 Tetrachloroethene ND 5.0 1 Trichloroethene ND 5.0 1 Vinyl Chloride ND 5.0 1 Surrogate Rec. Control Limits Qualifiers 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene 95 60-132 Dibromofluoromethane 107 63-141 r 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 112 62-146 `o Toluene -dB 102 80-120 0 Method Blank 099-12-796-7249 N/A Soil GC/MS PP 05/22/13 05/22/13 130522L01 16:20 Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 1 c-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 1 t-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 1 Tetrachloroethene ND 5.0 1 Trichloroethene ND 5.0 1 Vinyl Chloride ND 5.0 1 Surrogate Rec. ° Control Limits Qualifiers 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene 96 60-132 Dibromofluoromethane 104 63-141 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 111 62-146 Toluene -d8 99 80-120 RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit. 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501 aiscience nvironmental aboratories, Inc. Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate Page 11 of 20 PSI Date Received: 05/22/13 6330 Gateway Drive, Suite B Work Order: 13-05-1604 Cypress, CA 90630-4844 Preparation: EPA 5030C Method: EPA 82608 Project: Via Lido, Newport Bch. / 559 05/22113 Page 1 of 2 Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Date Analyzed MS/MSD Batch Number 13-05.1542.2 Aqueous GC/MS V V 05/22113 05/22113 14:27 130522801 Parameter Sample Spike MS MS MSD MSD %Rec. CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers Conc. Added Conc. 7/.-Rec. Conc. °% Rec. Benzene ND 50.00 47.03 94 47.22 94 78-120 0 0-20 Carbon Tetrachloride ND 50.00 40.95 82 41.91 84 67-139 2 0-20 Chlorobenzene ND 50.00 53.49 107 53.24 106 80-120 0 0-20 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 50.00 49.06 98 49.87 100 80-123 2 0-20 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 50.00 53.23 106 52.91 106 76-120 1 0-20 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 50.00 49.34 99 49.47 99 76-130 0 0-20 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 50.00 42.01 84 40.77 82 70-130 3 0-27 Ethylbenzene ND 50.00 47.83 96 47.00 94 73-127 2 0-20 Toluene ND 50.00 48.67 97 47.90 96 72-126 2 0-20 Trichloroethene ND 50.00 47.98 96 48.01 96 74-122 0 0-20 Vinyl Chloride ND 50.00 50.55 101 48.90 98 65-131 3 0-24 p/m-Xylene ND 100.0 89.72 90 85.10 85 70-130 5 0-30 o -Xylene ND 50.00 47.01 94 45.45 91 70-130 3 0-30 Methyl -t -Butyl Ether (MTBE) ND 50.00 39.35 79 45.62 91 69-123 15 0-20 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501 aiscience nvironmental aboratories, Inc. Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate Page 12 of 20 PSI Date Received: 05/22/13 6330 Gateway Drive, Suite B Work Order: 13-05-1604 Cypress, CA 90630-4844 Preparation: EPA 5030C Method: EPA 82608 Project: Via Lido, Newport Bch. / 559 05/22113 Page 2 of 2 Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Date Analyzed MS/MSD Batch Number B1-5 Soil GC/MS PP 05/22113 05/22113 18:39 130522S01 Parameter Sample Spike MS MS MSD MSD %Rec. CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers Conc. Added Conc. 7-Rec. Conc. T/ Rec. Benzene ND 50.00 49.17 98 47.46 95 61-127 4 0-20 Carbon Tetrachloride ND 50.00 51.71 103 49.74 99 51-135 4 0-29 Chlorobenzene ND 50.00 49.84 100 46.49 93 57-123 7 0-20 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 50.00 50.56 101 47.55 95 64-124 6 0-20 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 50.00 48.69 97 46.47 93 35-131 5 0-25 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 50.00 54.19 108 50.95 102 80-120 6 0-20 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 50.00 54.03 108 52.77 106 47-143 2 0-25 Ethylbenzene ND 50.00 53.07 106 49.82 100 57-129 6 0-22 Toluene ND 50.00 51.10 102 48.63 97 63-123 5 0-20 Trichloroethene ND 50.00 51.32 103 49.91 100 44-158 3 0-20 Vinyl Chloride ND 50.00 53.64 107 55.43 111 49-139 3 0-47 p/m-Xylene ND 100.0 105.9 106 99.22 99 70-130 7 0-30 o -Xylene ND 50.00 53.37 107 51.01 102 70-130 5 0-30 Methyl -t -Butyl Ether (MTBE) ND 50.00 51.93 104 50.08 100 57-123 4 0-21 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501 aiscience nvironmental aboratories, Inc. Quality Control - LCS/LCSD Page 13 of 20 PSI Date Received: 05/22/13 6330 Gateway Drive, Suite B Work Order: 13-05-1604 Cypress, CA 90630-4844 Preparation: N/A 099.12.981-3019 Method: EPA TO -15M Project: Via Lido, Newport Bch. / 559 GC/MS AA Page 1 of 4 Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Date Analyzed LCS/LCSD Batch Number 099.12.981-3019 Air GC/MS AA N/A 05/22113 12:39 130522L01 Parameter Soike LCS LCS LCSD LCSD °/ Rea CL ME CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers Added Conc. %Rea Conc. °/ Rec. Acetone 59.39 60.47 102 60.26 101 50-150 33-167 0 0-35 Benzene 79.87 78.19 98 80.14 100 60-156 44-172 2 0-40 Benzyl Chloride 129.4 148.2 115 148.1 114 50-150 33-167 0 0-35 Bromodichloromethane 167.5 173.6 104 175.1 105 50-150 33-167 1 0-35 Bromoform 258.4 291.1 113 286.9 111 50-150 33-167 1 0-38 Bromomethane 97.08 102.7 106 99.87 103 50-150 33-167 3 0-35 2-Butanone 73.73 83.24 113 83.58 113 50-150 33-167 0 0-35 Carbon Disulfide 77.85 79.27 102 79.81 103 50-150 33-167 1 0-35 Carbon Tetrachloride 157.3 166.1 106 165.4 105 64-154 49-169 0 0-32 Chlorobenzene 115.1 114.9 100 116.7 101 50-150 33-167 2 0-35 Chloroethane 65,96 58.55 89 57.12 87 50-150 33-167 2 0-35 Chloroform 122.1 121.2 99 121.8 100 50-150 33-167 1 0-35 Chloromethane 51.63 54.99 107 53.63 104 50-150 33-167 3 0-35 Dibromochloromethane 213.0 224.9 106 224.8 106 50-150 33-167 0 0-35 Dichlorodifluoromethane 123.6 126.0 102 121.4 98 50-150 33-167 4 0-35 1,1-Dichloroethane 101.2 101.6 100 102.6 101 50-150 33-167 1 0-35 1,1-Dichloroethene 99.12 100.5 101 100.8 102 50-150 33-167 0 0-35 1,2-Dibromoethane 192.1 203.1 106 203.4 106 54-144 39-159 0 0-36 Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 174.8 185.3 106 179.5 103 50-150 33-167 3 0-35 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene 150.3 156.9 104 157.6 105 34-160 13-181 0 0-47 1,2-Dichloroethane 101.2 105.4 104 105.2 104 69-153 55-167 0 0-35 1,2-Dichloropropane 115.5 115.0 99 117.3 102 67-157 52-172 2 0-35 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene 150.3 161.9 108 162.1 108 50-150 33-167 0 0-35 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene 150.3 155.6 103 155.9 104 36-156 16-176 0 0-47 c-1,3-Dichloropropene 113.5 122.6 108 124.4 110 61-157 45-173 1 0-35 c-1,2-Dichioroethene 99.12 99.91 101 101.5 102 50-150 33-167 2 0-35 t-1,2-Dichloroethene 99.12 100.0 101 102.1 103 50-150 33-167 2 0-35 t-1,3-Dichloropropene 113.5 128.9 114 129.8 114 50-150 33-167 1 0-35 Ethylbenzene 108.6 110.4 102 110.6 102 52-154 35-171 0 0-38 4-Ethyltoluene 122.9 126.6 103 126.5 103 50-150 33-167 0 0-35 Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene 266.6 265.0 99 270.5 101 50-150 33-167 2 0-35 2-Hexanone 102.4 109.7 107 109.5 107 50-150 33-167 0 0-35 Methyl -t -Butyl Ether (MTBE) 90.13 82.16 91 83.22 92 50-150 33-167 1 0-35 Methylene Chloride 86.84 82.52 95 83.39 96 50-150 33-167 1 0-35 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 102.4 104.3 102 107.7 105 50-150 33-167 3 0-35 o -Xylene 108.6 111.1 102 110.3 102 52-148 36-164 1 0-38 p/m-Xylene 217.1 225.8 104 224.4 103 42-156 23-175 1 0-41 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501 aiscience nvironmental aboratories, Inc. Quality Control - LCS/LCSD Page 14 of 20 PSI Date Received: 05/22/13 6330 Gateway Drive, Suite B Work Order: 13-05-1604 Cypress, CA 90630-4844 Preparation: N/A RPD CL Qualifiers Method: EPA TO -15M Project: Via Lido, Newport Bch. / 559 °Rec. Page 2 of 4 Parameter Spike LCS LCS LCSD LCSD %Rec. CL ME CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers Added Conc. °Rec. Conc. Styrene 106.5 106.9 100 106.7 100 50-150 33-167 0 0-35 Tetrachloroethene 169.6 178.9 106 178.2 105 56-152 40-168 0 0-40 Toluene 94.21 93.26 99 93.47 99 56-146 41-161 0 0-43 Trichloroethene 134.3 139.3 104 140.7 105 63-159 47-175 1 0-34 Trichlorofluoromethane 140.5 145.4 104 144.6 103 50-150 33-167 1 0-35 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2- 191.6 202.5 106 202.0 105 50-150 33-167 0 0-35 Trifluoroethane 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 136.4 142.5 104 143.1 105 50-150 33-167 0 0-35 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane 136.4 138.5 102 140.3 103 65-149 51-163 1 0-37 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 122.9 125.4 102 125.1 102 50-150 33-167 0 0-35 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane 171.6 176.0 103 175.3 102 50-150 33-167 0 0-35 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 122.9 126.4 103 126.2 103 50-150 33-167 0 0-35 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 185.5 194.8 105 195.5 105 50-150 33-167 0 0-35 Vinyl Acetate 88.03 95.48 108 97.84 111 50-150 33-167 2 0-35 Vinyl Chloride 63.91 67.77 106 66.77 104 45-177 23-199 1 0-36 Total number of LCS compounds: 51 Total number of ME compounds: 0 Total number of ME compounds allowed: 3 LCS ME CL validation result: Pass RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501 aiscience nvironmental aboratories, Inc. Quality Control - LCS/LCSD Page 15 of 20 PSI Date Received: 05/22/13 6330 Gateway Drive, Suite B Work Order: 13-05-1604 Cypress, CA 90630-4844 Preparation: EPA 5030C GC/MS V V Method: EPA 82608 Project: Via Lido, Newport Bch. / 559 130522L01 Page 3 of 4 Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Analyzed Lab File ID LCS Batch Number 099.14.001-11019 Aqueous GC/MS V V 0512211311:59 22MAY005.rr 130522L01 Parameter Soike Added Conc. LCS °/Rec. %Rec. CL ME CL Qualifiers Recovered Benzene 50.00 47.65 95 80-120 73-127 Carbon Tetrachloride 50.00 42.34 85 66-138 54-150 Chlorobenzene 50.00 53.20 106 80-120 73-127 1,2-Dibromoethane 50.00 48.99 98 80-120 73-127 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene 50.00 53.28 107 80-120 73-127 1,2-Dichloroethane 50.00 49.54 99 80-129 72-137 1,1-Dichlomethene 50.00 42.65 85 71-131 61-141 Ethylbenzene 50.00 48.89 98 80-123 73-130 Toluene 50.00 49.71 99 79-121 72-128 Trichloroethene 50.00 48.14 96 80-120 73-127 Vinyl Chloride 50.00 50.78 102 70-136 59-147 p/m-Xylene 100.0 95.47 95 75-125 67-133 o -Xylene 50.00 48.80 98 75-125 67-133 Methyl -t -Butyl Ether (MTBE) 50.00 42.56 85 72-126 63-135 Total number of LCS compounds: 14 Total number of ME compounds: 0 Total number of ME compounds allowed: 1 LCS ME CL validation result: Pass RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501 aiscience nvironmental aboratories, Inc. Quality Control - LCS/LCSD Page 16 of 20 PSI Date Received: 05/22/13 6330 Gateway Drive, Suite B Work Order: 13-05-1604 Cypress, CA 90630-4844 Preparation: EPA 5030C GC/MS PP Method: EPA 82608 Project: Via Lido, Newport Bch. / 559 130522L01 Page 4 of 4 Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Analyzed Lab File ID LCS Batch Number 099.12.796-7249 Soil GC/MS PP 05122113 15:19 22MAY004.rr 130522L01 Parameter Soike Added Conc. LCS °/Rec. %Rec. CL ME CL Qualifiers Recovered Benzene 50.00 50.09 100 78-120 71-127 Carbon Tetrachloride 50.00 53.89 108 49-139 34-154 Chlorobenzene 50.00 53.05 106 79-120 72-127 1,2-Dibromoethane 50.00 50.69 101 80-120 73-127 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene 50.00 54.32 109 75-120 68-128 1,2-Dichloroethane 50.00 53.13 106 80-120 73-127 1,1-Dichlomethene 50.00 54.94 110 74-122 66-130 Ethylbenzene 50.00 54.91 110 76-120 69-127 Toluene 50.00 52.87 106 77-120 70-127 Trichloroethene 50.00 52.84 106 80-120 73-127 Vinyl Chloride 50.00 67.31 135 68-122 59-131 X p/m-Xylene 100.0 112.6 113 75-125 67-133 o -Xylene 50.00 56.15 116 75-125 67-133 Methyl -t -Butyl Ether (MTBE) 50.00 53.72 107 77-120 70-127 Total number of LCS compounds: 14 Total number of ME compounds: 0 Total number of ME compounds allowed: 1 LCS ME CL validation result: Pass RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501 Page 17 of 20 Calsc%nce Environmental Glossary of Terms and Qualifiers Laborator/es, inc. Work Order: 13-05-1604 Page 1 of 1 Qualifiers Definition See applicable analysis comment. < Less than the indicated value. > Greater than the indicated value. 1 Surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to a required sample dilution. Therefore, the sample data was reported without further clarification. 2 Surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to matrix interference. The associated method blank surrogate spike compound was in control and, therefore, the sample data was reported without further clarification. 3 Recovery of the Matrix Spike (MS) or Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) compound was out of control due to matrix interference. The associated 1 -CS and/or LCSD was in control and, therefore, the sample data was reported without further clarification. 4 The MS/MSD RPD was out of control due to matrix interference. The 1-CS/1-CSD RPD was in control and, therefore, the sample data was reported without further clarification. 5 The PDS/PDSD or PES/PESD associated with this batch of samples was out of control due to a matrix interference effect. The associated batch LCS/LCSD was in control and, hence, the associated sample data was reported without further clarification. 6 Surrogate recovery below the acceptance limit. 7 Surrogate recovery above the acceptance limit. B Analyte was present in the associated method blank. BU Sample analyzed after holding time expired. BV Sample received after holding time expired. E Concentration exceeds the calibration range. ET Sample was extracted past end of recommended max. holding time. HD The chromatographic pattern was inconsistent with the profile of the reference fuel standard. HDH The sample chromatographic pattern for TPH matches the chromatographic pattern of the specified standard but heavier hydrocarbons were also present (or detected). HDL The sample chromatographic pattern for TPH matches the chromatographic pattern of the specified standard but lighter hydrocarbons were also present (or detected). J Analyte was detected at a concentration below the reporting limit and above the laboratory method detection limit. Reported value is estimated. ME LCS/LCSD Recovery Percentage is within Marginal Exceedance (ME) Control Limit range. ND Parameter not detected at the indicated reporting limit. Q Spike recovery and RPD control limits do not apply resulting from the parameter concentration in the sample exceeding the spike concentration by a factor of four or greater. SG The sample extract was subjected to Silica Gel treatment prior to analysis. X % Recovery and/or RPD out -of -range. Z Analyte presence was not confirmed by second column or GC/MS analysis. Solid - Unless otherwise indicated, solid sample data is reported on a wet weight basis, not corrected for % moisture. All QC results are reported on a wet weight basis. For any analysis identified as a "field" test with a holding time (HT) </= 15 minutes where the sample is received outside of HT, Calscience will adhere to its internal HT of 24 hours. In cases where sample analysis does not meet Calscience's internal HT, results will be appropriately qualified. 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501 Page 18 of 20 % F f- f - 6✓ -L d 9'8LZ068LL1396LL00/010 o O � w Lu XL41lOZ09 0 XLtrU0409 O sle;eW ZZl Z aco W IS OLZ9 0 OLZ8 0 sHtld m (2808) s80d Z N C m (L808) sap�arysad �(� m {� LIJ Y 9 (OLZ8) sOOAS O u1 � - aJo0 easel O aioO u3 0 (S90S) dad x (0928) saleueUXO D a ,� (09,8) SOOA ... Oro ?ry LSI U �/ U ❑ O8Z8 � 391W f X319 � � Z Y/ Hdl ® Q W Z �j IL 040 90 O 880-90 O Hdl Ma w p m m OdOO (P)Hdl0 .s✓ z z _. U a oaE) 0 (6)Hdl 0... 3 � 3 pajaAld Plow m a; rn o PanJasaad O M al VN s n a N U B R > 6 > 4 R > R 0 patiasaidun ^° J ✓ 1 Rd m of R W zoo U p O � x O y QVN Q e = V a ao 0 ®u Ln AS° E5 a JJJ z Q .� 7 E U m p N fRJ = a -17T At 7 V y LL `yy `/ ��/^�p • b z , z ��. m cNCP CID w �C12 U I� z QWW > ' 0 W J z v N a N a W W ¢ z Q Z J ] 0 U 1 U Page 19 of 20 WORK ORDER M 13-05-121 R El El Cooler of CLIENT: DATE: 05 Aa 2-113 TEMPERATURE: Thermometer ID SCI (Criteria: 0.0 OC — 6.0 °C, not frozen except sediment/tissue) Temperature 3 . � OC-0.20C(CF) = 3 . f OC Blank ❑ Sample ❑ Sample(s) outside temperature criteria (PM/APM contacted by: ). ❑ Sample(s) outside temperature criteria but received on ice/chilled on same day of sampling. ❑ Received at ambient temperature, placed on ice for transport by Courier.` Ambient Temperature: yZ"Air ❑ Filter Initial: 0 CUSTODY SEALSINTACT: ❑ Cooler ❑ ❑ No (Not Intact) ZrNot Present b NIA Initial: ❑ Sample ❑ ❑ No (Not Intact) XNot Present Initial: - SAMPLE CONDITION: Yes No N/A Chain -Of -Custody (COC) document(s) received with samples ................... d ❑ ❑ COC document(s) received complete ................................................... Zr ❑ ❑ ❑ Collection date/time, matrix, and/or # of containers logged in based on sample labels. ❑ No analysis requested. ❑ Not relinquished. ❑ No dateltime relinquished. Sampler's name indicated on COC ..................................................... Y ❑ ❑ Sample container label(s) consistent with COC ..................................... ❑ ❑ Sample container(s) intact and good condition ...................................... ❑ Z ❑ Proper containers and sufficient volume for analyses requested ............... ,Er ❑ ❑ Analyses received within holding time ................................................. Z ❑ ❑ pH / Res. Chlorine / Diss. Sulfide / Diss. Oxygen received within 24 hours... ❑ ❑ Proper preservation noted on COC or sample container .......................... izr- ❑ ❑ ❑ Unpreserved vials received for Volatiles analysis Volatile analysis container(s) free of headspace..................................... ❑ )a ❑ Tedlar bag(s) free of condensation...................................................... ❑ ❑ CONTAINER TYPE: Solid: 04ozCGJ AM ❑16ozCGJ 2lSleeve (�) ❑EnCoreso ❑Terra Cores° ❑ Water: ❑VOA �( M ❑VOAna2 ❑125AGB ❑125AGBh 0125AGBp ❑1AGB 01AGBna2 ❑1AGBs ❑500AGB ❑500AGJ ❑500AGJs 0250AGB 0250CGB ❑250CGBs 01PB 01PBna 0500PB ❑250PB ❑250PBn ❑125PB 0125PBznna ❑100PJ ❑100PJna2 ❑ ❑ -EI Air: 4Tedlar® El Canister Other: ElTrip Blank Lot#: Labeled/Checked by: �4 24 Container: C: Clear A: Amber P: Plastic G: Glass J: Jar B: Bottle Z: Ziploc/Resealable Bag E: Envelope Reviewed by: Pt/ Preservative: h: HCL m HNO3 na2:Na2S203 na: NaOH p: H3PO4 s: H2SO4 u: Ultra -pure znna: ZnAc2+Na0H f: Filtered Scanned by: Id -L, SOP T100_090 (11120112) 4 0 s Page 1 of 1 WORK •-D 1 M Q SA L NIALY FORM SAMPLES - CONTAINERS & LABELS: ❑ Sample(s) NOT RECEIVED but listed on COC ❑ Sample(s) received but NOT LISTED on COC ❑ Holding time expired — list sample ID(s) and test ❑ Insufficient quantities for analysis — list test ❑ Improper container(s) i used — list test ❑ Improper preservative used — list test ❑ No preservative noted on COC or label — list test & notify lab ❑ Sample labels illegible — note test/container type ❑ Sample label(s) do not match COC — Note in comments ❑ Sample ID ❑ Date and/or Time Collected ❑ Project Information ❑ # of Container(s) ❑ Analysis ❑ Sample container(s) compromised — Note in comments ❑ Water present in sample container ❑ Broken ❑Sample container(s) not labeled Air sample container(s) compromised — Note in comments ❑ Flat El Very low in volume ❑ Leaking (Not transferred - duplicate bag submitted) ❑ Leaking (transferred into Calscience Tedlar® Bag*) Leaking (transferred into Client's Tedlar° Bag*) ❑ Other:, HEADSPACE - Containers with Bubble > 6mm or '/4 inch: Comments: Sample# Container 913(s) #of Vials Sample# Received-. Container lC(s) 9 o Vials Sample# Received Container ID(s) #of Cont. Analysis received *Transferred at Client's request. Initial/ Date: 4 C— 05 121T113 0 s �" Infi enation Lmem To Build On Engineering • Consulting • Testing ASBESTOS AND LIMITED LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY Office Building 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA Prepared for: The Wieland-Davco Corporation 4162 English Oak Drive Lansing, Michigan 48911 PSI Project # 0588483-2 Prepared by: Professional Service Industries, Inc. 6330 Gateway Drive, Suite B Cypress, CA 90630 October 8, 2012 Gregory R. Archung, CAC, CDPH I/A Department Manager mozym Robert W. White, REA, CAC Principal Consultant This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of The Wieland-Davco Corporation, and affiliates thereof. Results are based solely on the methodology stated in this report and the report should be relied upon in its entirety. Any reliance a third party makes of this report is the responsibility of such third party. Professional Service Industries, Inc. • 6330 Gateway Drive Suite B • Cypress, CA 90630 • Phone 714/484-8600 • Fax 714/484-8601 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................1 RESULTS SUMMARY................................................................................................2 METHODS..................................................................................................................4 NOTICES, PERMITS, AND LICENSES......................................................................5 DRAWINGS................................................................................................................ 6 APPENDICES............................................................................................................. 7 Inspector Certifications Laboratory Results and Chain of Custody Documentation Codes and Regulations Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-2 SECTION 1 Executive Summary GENERAL INFORMATION Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) was retained by The Wieland-Davco Corporation to perform a survey for asbestos, including limited sampling for lead-based paint, at a three-story office building located at 3355 Via Lido, Newport Beach, California. The survey included both interior and exterior building materials, and is provided in support of future demolition of the building. AUTHORIZATION Written authorization to perform this survey was provided by The Wieland-Davco Corporation in the form of the execution of PSI proposal number 0588-71966 dated August 7, 2012. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The scope of work included the identification of suspect asbestos -containing materials (ACM) and major interior building components painted with lead-based paint (LBP). PSI's scope of work was limited to asbestos and lead, and therefore did not address fluorescent tubes, potential Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB), mold, and mercury -containing materials. The inspection was conducted on August 21, 23, 28, 31, September 7, 28 and October 5, 2012, by PSI Department Manager Gregory R. Archung, CAC #92-0041 and CDPH Lead Inspector/Assessor #390. Asbestos -Containing Materials A total of two hundred and fourteen (214) samples of suspect ACM representing seventy-six (76) types of homogeneous materials were collected from the building. Materials sampled generally included floor tiles and associated mastic, sheet flooring and associated glue, base cove and associated mastic, carpet glue, acoustic ceiling panels, acoustic ceiling tiles, ceiling plaster and associated mastic, wall plaster, drywall system, and roof system. Laboratory results indicated detectable levels of asbestos in flooring, mastic, smooth plaster lid, plaster ceiling, joint compound, roof mastic, Sprayed -On -Acoustic (SOA) plaster, and SOA drywall ceilings. A summary of laboratory result information is listed in Section 2 of this report. Lead -Based Paint A total of nine (9) samples were collected from the building for lead analysis during the survey. Three (3) of the paint chip samples had detectable levels of lead. A summary of laboratory result information is listed in Section 2 of this report. Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-2 SECTION 2 Results Summary ACM SURVEY RESULTS A material is considered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to be asbestos -containing if at least one sample collected from an area shows asbestos present in an amount greater than one percent (1%). In the State of California, the Department of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) considers a material to be asbestos -containing construction material (ACCM) if at least one sample collected from the area shows asbestos present in an amount greater than one-tenth of one percent (>0.1%). Specific removal and licensing requirements apply if ACM or ACCM will be disturbed during maintenance, renovation, or demolition activities. The following homogeneous building material types were sampled as part of this survey. Results are summarized in the tables below. MTL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LOCATION EPA COND NO. OF °� ACM QUANTITY #. CAT SAMPLES 01 1x1 Spline Ceiling Tile Suite D NA G 3 ND 1,500 SF 02 9" Black FTI Mastic Suite D CAT I G 3 Floor Tile=8% CH 11200 SF Mastic=2% CH Peel N Stick=ND 12" Gold Peel N Gold SF=ND 03 Stick/Gold SF/Red Suite C, Mechanical Room CAT I G 3 Red FT=8%CH 400 SF Hallway Yellow FT=B% CH FT/Yellow FT/Mastic Clear M=ND Black M= 3% CH 04 Smooth Plaster Lid Suite A RACM F 3 Plaster=<l% CH 12,500 SF Skim Coat=ND 05 9" White FT Suite F under portion of carpet CAT I F 1 Floor Tile=8%CH 200 SF 06 12" Beige FT/Glue/BM Suite G Verizon NA F 3 Floor Tile=ND 500 SF Mastic=ND 07 Plaster Ceiling/Button Throughout: Suites B, C, D & F r RACM F 5 Plaster =10% CH 5,700 SF Board and 1 Floor Restaurant Button Board=ND 08 2'x4' Squiggle Pin Hole Suite F, G, & 255 NA F 4 ND 1,700 SF Ceiling Panels 09 Black Mastic Under Rear Suite A NA F 2 ND 200 SF Carpet Mastic 10 2'x2' Design Ceiling 1" Floor Elevator Lobby NA F 3 ND 300 SF Panels 11 Plaster Lid 1 Floor Elevator Lobby RACM F 3 8% CH 1,200 SF 12 Gray Sheet Suite A Bathroom NA F 1 SF=ND 30 SF Floorin /M/BM I Mastic=ND 13 Drywall/Joint 1° Floor Throughout: Suite A, D, RACM F 7 Drywall=ND 3,000 SF Compound F Walls and Kitchen JC = <l% CH 14 Plaster Wall 10 Floor Suites A and G RACM F 4 Base Coat -ND F. Coat- <1% CH 400 SF 15 2'x4' Ceiling Panels Suite B & C NA F 2 ND NA 16 Roof Core Throughout Roof NA F 4 Shingle -ND NA Felt=ND 17 Roof Mastic Throughout: Pitch Pocket, Duct CAT I F 3 6% CH 300 LF Seam, Vent Pipe 18 Beige Tread Material Balcony Throughout NA F 4 ND 1.000 SF 19 9" Beige Floor Tile + Under Carpet Suite205, Offices, CAT I F 1 FT=2% CH 600 SF Black Mastic Meeting Room Mastic=ND 12" Beige Peel NPeel N Stick=ND Stick/White SFIBlk Suite 205, Kitchen/Storage CAT I F 1 SF=10% CH 100 SF 20 Mastic Mastic=ND 21 2'x4' Ceiling Panels Suite 205 F F 2 ND NA F=Friable; NF=Non-friable Friability is further defined in section 4 2Cond. = Condition of Materials (Good, Fair, Poor) SF = Square feet LF = Linear feet NA = Not applicable ND = No asbestos detected CH = Chrysotile DW = Drywall JC = Joint Compound Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-2 ACM SURVEY RESULTS - continued MTL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LOCATION EPA GOND NO. OF %ACM QUANTITY #. CAT SAMPLES 2" Floor Throughout: Meeting Rm., Kitchen, Suites 200, 205, 210, 215, 225, 230, 235, 240, 245, 22 Plaster Wall 255, 265, 270/250, 275, 280, RACM F 14 Fin. Coat=2% CH 12,000 SF Large Rm. Across Rm. 280, Rm. Base Coat=ND Adjacent to Rm. 280, 286, 290, Utility Closet and Janitor's Closet 2" Floor Throughout: Suites Plaster 200, 205, 210, 215, 225, 235, 240, 23 Ceiling/Reminiscence 245, 255, 265, 270/250, 275, RACM F 9 8% CH 2,300 SF Ceiling Large Rm. Across Rm. 280, 285, Men's RR and Women's RR 24 Plaster Wall 2ntl Floor Corridors NA F 3 Skim Coat=ND NA Plaster=ND 25. SOA Plaster Ceiling 2" Floor Corridors RACM F 1 8% CH 1,200 SF 26 Drywall +Joint 3' Floor Corridors RACM F 3 DW -ND 1 700 SF ' Compound JC=<1% CH 27 SOA Plaster Ceiling 3 Floor Elevator Lobb NA F 3 ND NA 28 SDA Drywall Ceiling 3 Floor Corridors: NE and E RACM F 3 Acoustic= <1% 500 SF corridors DW=ND 3 Floor Corridors /1° Floor 29 2'x4' PH Ceiling Panels Restaurant NA F 4 ND NA Througo and 3 Floor 30 Brown Base Cove Mastic Cor Corridors NA F 2 ND NA 31 Beige Floor Tile + Black Under Carpet 3'O Floor Corridors CAT[ F 1 FT=B°k CH 100 SF Mastic Mastic=ND 32 1 Tan/Black Mastic Under Carpet V Floor Corridors NA F 2 ND NA 33 Brown Cementitious 3r° Floor Balcony NF F 2 ND NA Material 31a els 34 Float Material + FT 3`O Floor Corridors CAT[ F 2 e7% 50 SF CH FT=35 Drywall +Joint 3r° Floor: Suite 360 NA F 2 DW=ND NA Compound JC=ND 36 Beige 2'x4' New Ceiling 3'" Floor: Suite 360 NA F 2 ND NA Panels 37 Cork Material/Glue Suite 360 NA F 2 ND NA 38 Black Cementitious Floor Under Carpet Suite 360 NA F 1 ND NA Material 39 2'x4' New Ceiling Panels Suite 245, 265, 235, 286, 280, NA F 4 ND NA 230,210 1'x1' Large Dot Ceiling CT=ND 40 Panels/Glue Suite 225 CATII F 2 Mastic=<l% 250 SF Anthophyllite 41 Drywall/ Joint Compound Suites 225, 230, 265, 285/ E. NA F 7 DW=ND 2,500 SF Stairwell JC=ND 42 9" Brown FT/Black Suites 215, 245, 265, 285, CATI F 4 FT=10% CH 2,300 SF Mastic 2701250, 205 Mastic=ND 43 9" Beige FTlBlack Suite 240, 235 CATI F 2 FT=10% CH 350 SF Mastic Mastic=ND 44 9" Mosaic Beige Suite 280 CAT] F 1 FT=5% CH 320 SF FTIBIack Mastic Mastic=6% CH 45 9" Lite Green FT/Black Suite 255 CATI F 1 FT=8% CH 150 SF Mastic Mastic=ND 46 12" White FT/Mastic Suite 280 NA F 1 FT/Mastic=ND 40 SF 47 1 Brown Carpet Mastic Suite 275 NA F 2 ND 900 SF 'F=Friable; NF=Non-friable Friability is further defined in section 4 2Cond. = Condition of Materials (Good, Fair, Poor) SF = Square feet LF = Linear feet NA = Not applicable ND = No asbestos detected CH = Chrysotile DW = Drywall JC = Joint Compound Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-2 ACM SURVEY RESULTS - continued MTL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LOCATION EPA CONO NO. OF %ACM QUANTITY #. CAT SAMPLES 48 Tan Carpet Mastic Suite 225 NA F 2 ND 500 SF 49 Float Material Under Car et Suite 265 NA F 1 ND 100 SF Drywall/Joint Throughout3 Floor: Suites JC=<7%CH 50 Compound 300, 325, 345, 365, 355, 374, 340, RACM F 12 DW=ND 7,000 SF 330, 350, 316 1x1 Plain White CT=ND 51 CT/Glue/Plaster/BB Suite 305 NA F 2 Glue=ND 300 SF Plaster=ND 52 1'kt' CT/Glue Suite 340 NA F 2 CT=ND 900 SF Glue=ND 53 1 Orange SF/Mastic Suite 310 CATI F 1 1 25% CH 40 SF Cork CT=ND 54 Cork CT/Glue Suite 320 CATII F 2 Mastic= <1% 300 SF Antho h (lite Shingle=ND 55 Roof Core Middle Roof NA F 2 Roofng=ND 300 SF Felt/Mastic=ND Mastic 1=ND Carpet Mastic/9" Green FT=12% CH 56 FT/Mastic Suite 300, 290 CAT] F 2 Mastic 2=ND 800 SF Leveling Compound=ND Carpet Mastic/9" White Mastic 1=ND 57 Suite 300 CATI F 1 Mastic 2=ND 300 SF FT/Mastic FT=12% CH Carpet Mastic/9" Brown Mastic 1=ND 58 FT/Mastic Suite 300 CATI F 1 Mastic 2=ND 300 SF FT=12% CH Under Wood Flooring: Suites 59 Black Mastic 365, Large Room Across 365, CAT] F 1 3% CH 1,300 SF 355, 345, 335, 325, 315, 378, 380, 374, 376, 370, and 372 60 Black Mastic Suite 350, 372, 340 NA F 7 ND 61 Spray -on Acoustic Suite 310 and 305 NA F 5 ND 62 12" White FT/Mastic Middle Space North NA F 2 FT=ND Mastic=ND 63 9" Lite Green FT/Black Suite 305 Under Carpet CATI F 1 FT=4% CH 700 SF Mastic Mastic=ND 64 9" Brown FT/BlackStorage Closet, 3'" Floor CATI F 1 FT=10% CH 100 SF Mastic Mastic=ND 65 2'x4' Ceiling Panels Suites 300, 365 F F 2 ND 66 1 Plaster Ceiling Suite 300 NF I F 3 ND 67 Plaster Walls Suite 300, 315, 310 RACM F 4 F. Coat= <1 % CH 31000 SF Base Coat=ND 68 Exterior Plaster Exterior Wall NA F 3 ND 69 Plaster Wall 1" and 3rtl Floor Stairwells NA F 2 Finish Coat=ND Base Coat=ND 70 Blue FT/Mastic Stairwell West and East NA F 3 FT=ND Mastic=ND 71 Green SF/Mastic 1" Floor Restaurant and Offices NA P 1 SF=Mast=NND 72 12" Black FT/Mastic 1" Floor Restaurant NA F 2 FT ND M 73 12" Red Brick Pattern 1st Floor Mail Room CATI F 1 70 SF FT/Mastic 74 Mudded Joint 1st Floor Mechanical Rm. 3" Line RACM F 1 4 visible 75 Mudded Joint 1st Floor Mechanical Rm. 1" HW RACM F 1 3 visible Line 76 20" Tansite Pipe Mechanical Rm. To Roof CATII NF 0 Known Asbestos 40 LF 'F=Friable; NF=Non-friable Friability is further defined in section 4 'Cond. = Condition of Materials (Good, Fair, Poor) SF = Square feet LF = Linear feet NA = Not applicable ND = No asbestos detected CH = Chrysotile DW = Drywall JC = Joint Compound Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Projectk0588483-2 When samples analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy contain asbestos in amounts less than ten percent (<10%), a more exact method of analysis called point counting may be performed at the client's request. The EPA point count method allows a sample in which asbestos was visually detected, but which is visually estimated to have 10% or less asbestos, to be more accurately quantified. EPA required point counting for sample results of <1% asbestos. If not point counted, a sample in which asbestos was visually detected and estimated (including trace to :51%) must be assumed to be greater than 1 % and treated as ACM. PSI recommends point counting of the smooth plaster lid (material group 04), joint compound (material group 13), joint compound (material group 26), SOA ceiling (material group 28), joint compound (material group 41), joint compound (material group 50), glue (material group 54) and plaster walls (material group 67). LEAD -CONTAINING MATERIALS RESULTS Lead was detected in three (3) of the nine (9) paint chip samples collected. Lead was identified on samples collected at the window sill, 3rd floor eastern stairwell, and 3rd floor exterior door. Federal efforts to regulate LBP began with the enactment of the Lead -Based Paint Poison Prevention Act (LBPPPA) in 1971. In 1973, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) defined lead-based paint as paint having lead content equal to or greater than 0.5 percent by weight in a dry film of newly applied paint. In 1978, the CPSC lowered the allowable lead levels in new paint to 0.06%. The Housing and Urban Development Agency (HUD) developed guidelines relating to HUD facilities. The HUD guidelines specified lead content of 0.5% as an action level in determining the need for corrective action. Federal and State Occupational Health and Safety Administration (Fed -OSHA 29 CFR 1920.1025 and DOSH under Title 8 CCR 1532.1) do not define the amount of lead in paint to a regulatory requirement; rather the activities or task define when the regulation is in effect. Both Federal and State standards use the term "trigger task" activities. In the work place, employers must make certain assumptions of the exposure levels and comply with the regulations based on the level of disturbance rather than the lead level. The following materials were sampled for lead content as part of this survey. Results are summarized in the tables below: Painted Representative Surfaces MATERIAL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION I LOCATION CONDITIONS RESULT QUANTITY No. % LEAD BY WEIGHT 01 Wall/Ground—White Throughout Exterior P <0.010%* Unknown 02 Wall/Ground—Mauve Throughout Exterior P <0.010%* Unknown 03 Guard R 2"d Floor Balcony/Metal P <0.010%* 100 LF k/lcony— PinWBuBlue 04 Window Sill/Exterior—White 3 Floor/Wood P 0.011% 40 LF 05 Wall/Exterior Patio— 3'd Floor/Wood P <0.010%* 200 SF White/Gray Suite 215C South Wall— 06 White 2^d Floor Wall P <0.010%* 1,000 SF 07 East Stairwell 3' Floor—Gra East Stairwell P 0.11% 100 SF 08 West Stairwell 1 Floor— West Stairwell P <0.010%* 100 SF White 09 3 Floor Exterior SE Exterior Door P 0.063% 100 SF *This result is below the Limit of Detection Title 17, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Division 1, Chapter 8: Accreditation, Certification and Work Practices for Lead -Based Paint and Lead Hazards, defines lead-based paint as paint or other surfacing coating that contains an amount of lead equal to, or in excess of, one milligram per square Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Projectk0588483-2 centimeter (1.0 mg/cm2) or more than 0.5% by weight. The industry has interpreted this to mean that any detectable amount of lead is regulated. For example, employees who perform trigger tasks (such as manual demolition) are required to receive employer provided training, air monitoring, protective clothing, respirators, and hand washing facilities. In addition there are standard work practices required such as the use of wet methods and HEPA vacuums. Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Projectk0588483-2 SECTION 3 Warranty PSI warrants that the findings contained herein have been prepared in general accordance with the standard of care exercised within the asbestos and lead-based paint testing and abatement industries. PSI recognizes that raw laboratory test data are not usually sufficient to make all abatement and management decisions. The survey included inspection of reasonably accessible materials such as above or behind suspended ceilings, walls, or other non -permanent structures. PSI did not, however, inspect or sample inaccessible areas. The information contained in this report is based upon the data furnished by The Wieland-Davco Corporation, and observations and test results provided by PSI. These observations and results are time dependent and are subject to changing site conditions and revisions to Federal, State, and local regulations. No other warranties are implied or expressed. Use by Third Parties This report was prepared pursuant to the contract PSI has with The Wieland-Davco Corporation That contractual relationship included an exchange of information about the subject sites that was unique and between PSI and Wieland-Davco Corp., and serves as the basis upon which this report was prepared. Because of the importance of the communication between PSI and Wieland-Davco Corporation, reliance or any use of this report by anyone other than Wieland-Davco Corporation for whom it was prepared is prohibited and therefore not foreseeable to PSI. Reliance or use by any such third party without explicit authorization in the report does not make said third party a third party beneficiary to PSI's contract with The Wieland-Davco Corporation Any such unauthorized reliance on or use of this report, including any of its information or conclusions, will be at third party's risk. For the same reasons, no warranties or representations, expressed or implied in this report, are made to any such third party. Unidentifiable Conditions This report is necessarily limited to the conditions observed and to the information available at the time of the work. Due to the nature of the work, there is a possibility that conditions may exist which could not be identified within the scope of work or which were not apparent at the time of our site work. This report is also limited to information available from The Wieland-Davco Corporation at the time it was prepared. The report may not represent all conditions at the subject sites as it only reflects the information gathered from specific locations. Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Projectk0588483-2 SECTION 4 Methods ASBESTOS Inspection and sampling procedures were performed in accordance with the guidelines published by the EPA in 40 CFR Part 763 Subpart E, October 30, 1987. Sampling procedures include collection of at least three samples of all suspect friable and non -friable materials as recommended by EPA Guidance Document 700/B-92/001, February 1992. An EPA accredited inspector performed the inspection and survey as described below. The survey consisted of three major activities: visual inspection, sampling, and quantification of building materials. Although these activities are listed separately, they are integrated tasks. VISUAL INSPECTION An initial building walkthrough was conducted to determine the presence and condition of suspect materials that were accessible and/or exposed. Materials which were similar in general appearance were grouped into homogeneous sampling areas. ■ Homogeneous Material Classifications A preliminary walkthrough of the building was conducted to determine areas of materials which were visually similar in color, texture, general appearance, and which appeared to have been installed at the same time. Such materials are termed "homogeneous materials" by the EPA. During this walkthrough, the approximate locations of these homogeneous materials were also noted. Following the EPA inspection protocol, each identified suspect homogeneous material was placed in one of the following EPA classifications: Surfacing Materials (spray or trowel applied to building members). 2. Thermal System Insulation (materials generally applied to various mechanical systems). 3. Miscellaneous Materials (any materials which do not fit either of the above categories). ■ Friability Classifications A regulated asbestos -containing material (RACM) as defined by National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), is any (a) Friable asbestos material, (b) Category I non - friable ACM that has become friable, (c) Category I non -friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading, or (d) Category II non -friable ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations. Following the EPA inspection protocol, each identified suspect homogeneous material was placed in one of the following EPA classifications: Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Projectk0588483-2 I . Friable Materials NESHAP defines a friable ACM as any material containing more than one percent asbestos that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. 2. Category I Non -friable NESHAP defines a Category I non -friable ACM as packing, gaskets, resilient floor covering (except sheet flooring products which are considered friable), and asphalt roofing products which contain more than one percent asbestos. 3. Category II Non -friable NESHAP defines a Category II non -friable ACM as any material, except for a Category I non -friable ACM, which contains more than one percent asbestos and cannot be reduced to a powder by hand pressure when dry. SAMPLING PROCEDURES Following the walkthrough, the inspector collected selected samples of accessible materials identified as suspect ACM. EPA guidelines were used to determine the sampling protocol. Sampling locations were chosen to be representative of the homogeneous material. Samples of surfacing material were collected in general accordance with the EPA sampling protocol outlined in the EPA publication, "Asbestos in Buildings: Simplified Sampling Scheme for Friable Surfacing Materials" (EPA 560/5-85-030a, October, 1985). Representative samples were taken preferentially from already damaged areas or areas which were the least visible. Samples of miscellaneous materials were taken as randomly as possible, while again attempting to sample already damaged areas so as to minimize disturbance of the material. Multiple sampling was used to assess each miscellaneous material unless the total quantity of accessible material was less than 260 square feet. QUANTIFICATION Quantities of accessible and/or exposed building materials that were suspected of containing asbestos were estimated. Taking approximate measurements in the field performed this estimation. LABORATORY PROCEDURES Method of Analysis Analysis was performed at LA Testing's Laboratory in Garden Grove, California, a National Volunteer Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) accredited laboratory. A chain -of -custody, documenting the possession of the samples from the time they were collected until analyzed and stored, was submitted with the bulk samples. The original chain -of -custody accompanied the materials at all times. Custody documentation began at the time samples were collected and each transferor retained a copy of the chain -of -custody record. Analysis was performed by using the bulk sample for visual observation and slide preparation(s) for microscopic examination and identification. The samples were mounted on slides and then analyzed for asbestos (chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, anthophyllite, and actinolite/tremolite), fibrous non -asbestos constituents (mineral wool, paper, etc.) and non-fibrous constituents. Refractive indices, morphology, color, pleochroism, birefringence, extinction characteristics, and signs of elongation identified asbestos. The same characteristics were used to identify the non - asbestos constituents. Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Projectk0588483-2 The microscopist visually estimated relative amounts of each constituent by determining the volume of each constituent in proportion to the total volume of the sample, using a stereoscope. All bulk samples were analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining as described by the method of the determination of asbestos in bulk insulation, EPA/600/R-93/116, July 1993. This is a standard method of analysis in optical mineralogy and the currently accepted method for the determination of asbestos in bulk samples. A suspect material is immersed in a solution of known refractive index and subjected to illumination by polarized light. The characteristic color displays which result enable mineral identification. It should be noted that some ACM might not be accurately identified and/or quantified by PLM. As an example, the original fabrication of vinyl floor tiles routinely involved milling of asbestos fibers to extremely small sizes. As a result, these fibers may go undetected under the standard PLM method. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) is recommended for a more definitive analysis of these materials. For bulk samples which are found to contain <1% asbestos, Point Count Analysis as described by the method for the determination of asbestos in accordance with Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) "Interim Method for Identification of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples" (40 CFR 763, Appendix A, Subpart F), is often utilized. As part of this method, a bulk sample is reduced, in an effort to dissolve any non -asbestos constituents, such as calcite. As a result of this reduction process, a concentrated sample is then obtained and analyzed. In California a minimum number of counts for each sample is 1000. The number of identified asbestos points is divided by 1000, then multiplied by 100 in order to calculate the percentage. Each asbestos type is quantified individually. LEAD-BASED PAINT This survey was prepared in anticipation of possible renovation of the building. Survey activities included the sampling of exterior lead-based paint on major building components with sample locations provided in the drawings set forth in Section 6 of this report. Major exterior building components were selected and paint -chip and bulk sampling was performed. SAMPLING PROCEDURES Following the walk-through, the inspector performed paint -chip and bulk sampling of the selected building component. The paint chip sample was an approximately 2" x 2" chip that represents all potential paint layers. LABORATORY PROCEDURES Method of Analysis Analysis was performed at LA Testing's Laboratory in Garden Grove, California, an Environmental Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELLAP) accredited laboratory, using the method for determination of lead in paint -chip samples. The lead analysis was performed using a Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (FLAA) (Method 7420). The FLAA burner head was first lit by opening the flow regulator on the acetylene tank, and was allowed to thermally stabilize before any analysis procedures could begin. The samples were filtered and examined after placing in an auto - sampler tube. The FLAA was calibrated using a known lead standard. After the FLAA calibration procedure was completed, the lead -chip samples were analyzed by the FLAA. Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Projectk0588483-2 Laboratory Quality Control Program LA Testing's Laboratory is AIHA accredited and participates in the AIHA, ELLAP, and ELPAT performance rounds as part of the accreditation requirements. Quality control procedures at the laboratory monitor the proficiency of the technicians and the reliability of the results, and include the insertion of various samples into the sample stream for quality assurance. The laboratory demonstrates proficiency with each analytical method used, including documentation of precision and accuracy, and maintenance of detection limit information. Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Projectk0588483-2 SECTION 5 Notices, Permits, and Licenses If the ACM or lead -containing paints identified in this report will be disturbed through future maintenance, renovation, or demolition activities, they will be subject to the requirements set forth in all applicable local, state, and federal regulations. The following notices, permits, and licenses are necessary for abatement work as of the date of this report. The abatement contractor is cautioned to verify these requirements as applicable to the final project scope and confirm that no new requirements exist. LOCAL AIR QUALITY BOARD Written notification is required to the South Coast Air Quality Management District at least 14 days prior to beginning any work on friable or non -friable ACM of 100 square feet or greater. This requirement is also enforced by the EPA. The following notices, permits and licenses are necessary for abatement work as of the date of this report. The abatement contractor is cautioned to verify these requirements as applicable to the final project scope and confirm that no new requirements exist. LICENSES The Abatement Contractor must maintain current licenses as required by applicable state or local jurisdictions for the removal, transporting, disposal, or other regulated activity. Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Projectk0588483-2 SECTION 6 Drawings Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-2 SECTION 7 Appendices Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-2 INSPECTOR CERTIFICATIONS Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-2 State of California Department of Public Health Lead-Related Certificate Expiration Construction Tvce Date Certificate In pectorlAssessor 1110712012 Xect Designer 1110712012 Project Monitor 11107/2012 o A� Gregory R. Archung a f ID# 3W i LABORATORY RESULTS AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENTATION ASBESTOS Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-2 ALA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 331 11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 Phone/Fax: (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslabaatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/24/12 4:10 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/31/2012 Sample Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 % Type Project: 0588483-2 /Office Bldg./ 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA 1x1 Spline Ct- Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Methods) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55-01 1x1 Spline Ct- White/Grayish 75% Cellulose 15% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite D Fibrous 10% Glass 331272431-0001 Homogeneous 55-02 1x1 Spline Ct- White/Grayish 75% Cellulose 15% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite D Fibrous 10% Glass 331272431-0002 Homogeneous 55-03 1x1 Spline Ct- Not Submitted Suite D 331212431-0003 55 -04 -Floor Tile 9" Black FT / Black 92% Non-fibrous (other) 8% Chrysotile Suide D Non -Fibrous 331212431-0004 Homogeneous 55 -04 -Mastic 9" Black FT / Black 98% Non-fibrous (other) 2% Chrysotile Suide D Non -Fibrous 331212431-0009A Homogeneous 55-05 9" Black FT / Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Suide D 331212431-0005 55-06 9" Black FT / Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Suide D 331212431-0006 55 -07 -Peel N Stick 12" Gold Peel N Black/Gold 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Stick/SF/Red Non -Fibrous 331212431-0007 FT/Mastic-Suite C Homogeneous Christopher Kim (52) Krystyn Gonzales (76) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repst relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good contlition unless othemiise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/31/2012 17:06:48 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/31/2012 5:06:48 PM 1 ALA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 331 11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 lchummi (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslabaatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/24/12 4:10 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/31/2012 Non -Asbestos Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Appearance Project: 0588483-2 /Office Bldg./ 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA % Type Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Methods) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -07 -Sheet Flooring 12" Gold Peel N Beige/Gdd 15% Cellulose 85% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Stick/SF/Red Fibrous 331212431-0007A FT/Mastic-Suite C Heterogeneous 55 -07 -Floor Tile 12" Gold Peel N Red 92% Non-fibrous (other) 8% Chrysotile Stick/SF/Red Non -Fibrous 331212431-00078 FT/Mastic-Suite C Homogeneous 55 -07 -Mastic 12" Gold Peel N Clear 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Stick/SF/Red Non -Fibrous 331212431-0007C FT/Mastic-Suite C Homogeneous 55 -08 -Peel N Stick 12" Gold Peel N Black/Gold 100% Nan -fibrous (other) None Detected Stick/SF/Mastic- Non -Fibrous 331212431-WOB Suite Homogeneous 55 -08 -Sheet Flooring 12" Gold Peel N Beige/Gold 15% Cellulose 85% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Stick/SF/Mastic- Fibrous 331212431-WOM Suite Heterogeneous 55 -08 -Mastic 12" Gold Peel N Black 3% Cellulose 97% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Stick/SF/Mastic- Non -Fibrous 331212431-WO6B Suite Homogeneous 55 -09 -Peel N Stick 12" Gold Peel N Gold 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Stick/SF/Red Non -Fibrous 331212431-0009 FT/Mastic-Suite C Homogeneous 55 -09 -Sheet Flooring 12" Gold Peel N Beige/Gdd 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Stick/SF/Red Fibrous 331212431-0009A FT/Mastic-Suite C Heterogeneous Christopher Kim (52) Krystyn Gonzales (76) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repst relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good contlition unless othemiise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/31/2012 17:06:48 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/31/2012 5:06:48 PM 2 ALA Testing Cu Testing Order: 331 11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CustomerlD: 32PRSV2PRSV78 Phone/Fax: (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslabaatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/24/12 4:10 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/31/2012 Sample Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 % Type Project: 0588483-2 /Office Bldg./ 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA 12" Gold Peel N Yellow Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -09 -Floor Tile 12" Gold Peel N Yellow 92% Non-fibrous (other) 8% Chrysotile Stick/SF/Red Non -Fibrous 331212431-00098 FT/Mastic-Suite C Homogeneous 55 -09 -Mastic 12" Gold Peel N Black 97% Non-fibrous (other) 3% Chrysotile Stick/SF/Red Non -Fibrous 331212431-0009C FT/Mastic-Suite C Homogeneous 55-10 Smooth Plaster Lid- Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) <1% Chrysotile SuiteA Non -Fibrous 331272431-0010 Heterogeneous Unable to separate plaster and joint compound 55 -11 -Skim Coat Smooth Plaster Lid- White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected SuiteA Non -Fibrous 331212431-0011 Homogeneous 55 -11 -Plaster Smooth Plaster Lid- Beige 100% Nan -fibrous (other) None Detected SuiteA Non -Fibrous 331212431-OO1fA Homogeneous 55 -12 -Skim Coat Smooth Plaster Lid- White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected SuiteA Non -Fibrous 31 Homogeneous 55 -12 -Plaster Smooth Plaster Lid- Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected SuiteA Non -Fibrous 331272431-0012A Homogeneous 55 -13 -Floor Tile 9"Wht FT/Mastic- Beige 92% Non-fibrous (other) 8% Chrysotile Under Carpet- Non -Fibrous 331212431-0013 Suite F Homogeneous Insufficient mastic Christopher Kim (52) Krystyn Gonzales (76) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to coal of analysis, This repot relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by Ne client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good contlition unless othemiise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. R porting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/31/2012 17:06:48 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/31/2012 5:06:48 PM 3 ALA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 331 11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 PIrsonsi (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslabaatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/24/12 4:10 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/31/2012 Non -Asbestos Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Description Project: 0588483-2 /Office Bldg./ 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -14 -Floor Tile 12" Beige Mosaic Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected FT/Glue/Mastic- Non -Fibrous 331212431-0014 Suite Verzon Homogeneous 55 -14 -Mastic 12" Beige Mosaic Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected FT/Glue/Mastic- Non -Fibrous 331212431-0014A Suite Verzon Homogeneous 55 -15 -Floor Tile 12" Beige Mosaic White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected FT/Glue/Mastic- Non -Fibrous 331212431-0015 Suite Verzon Homogeneous 55 -15 -Mastic 12" Beige Mosaic Black 100% Nan -fibrous (other) None Detected FT/Glue/Mastic- Non -Fibrous 331212431-0015A Suite Verzon Homogeneous 55 -16 -Floor Tile 12" Beige Mosaic White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected FT/Glue(Mastic- Non -Fibrous 331212431-0018 Suite Verzon Homogeneous 55 -16 -Mastic 12" Beige Mosaic Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected FT/Glue/Mastic- Non -Fibrous 331212431-0016A Suite Verzon Homogeneous 55 -17 -Plaster Ceiling Plaster Beige 10% Cellulose 80% Non-fibrous(other) 10% Chrysotile Ceiling/Button Fibrous 331212431-0017 BoardThroughout- Homogeneous Suite F 55 -17 -Button Board Plaster BrownlWhite 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Ceiling/Button Fibrous 331212431-0017A BoardThroughout- Heterogeneous Suite F Christopher Kim (52) Krystyn Gonzales (76) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repst relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good contlition unless othemiise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/31/2012 17:06:48 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/31/2012 5:06:48 PM 4 ALA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 331 11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 Phone/Fax: (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslabaatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/24/12 4:10 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/31/2012 Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Sample Project: 0588483-2 /Office Bldg./ 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA Appearance Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Methods) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -18 -Plaster Ceiling Plaster Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Ceiling/Button 331212431 -oafs BoardThroughout- Suite C 55 -18 -Button Board Plaster Brown/White 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Ceiling/Button Fibrous 331212431-WIM BoardThroughout- Heterogeneous Suite C 55 -19 -Plaster Ceiling Plaster Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Ceiling/Button 331212431-0079 BoardThroughout- Suite D 55 -19 -Button Board Plaster Brown/White 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Ceiling/Button Fibrous 331212431-0019A BoardThroughout- Heterogeneous Suite D 55-20 2x4 Squiggle Pin W hite/Grayish 75% Cellulose 15% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Hole Ceiling Fibrous 10% Glass 331212431-0020 Panels -Suite F,G Homogeneous 55-21 2x4 Squiggle Pin W hite/Beige 75% Cellulose 15% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Hole Ceiling Fibrous 10% Glass 331212431-W21 Panels -2nd FI Homogeneous W omens 55-22 2x4 Squiggle Pin White/Beige 75% Cellulose 15% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Hole Ceiling Fibrous 10% Glass 331212431-0022 panels -2nd FI Homogeneous W omens Christopher Kim (52) Krystyn Gonzales (76) l Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repst relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good contlition unless othemiise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/31/2012 17:06:48 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/31/2012 5:06:48 PM 5 ALA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 331 11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 Phone/Fax: (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslabaatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/24/12 4:10 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/31/2012 Non -Asbestos Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Description Project: 0588483-2 /Office Bldg./ 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55-23 Blk Mastic Under Tan/Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Carpet -Suite A- Non -Fibrous 331212431-8023 Rear Heterogeneous 55-24 Blk Mastic Under Tan/Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Carpet -Suite A- Non -Fibrous 331212431-0024 Rear Heterogeneous 55-25 2x2 Design Ceiling Grayish 80% Min. Wool 20% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Panels -1 st Fl Fibrous 331212431-0025 Elevator Lobby Homogeneous 55-26 2x2 Design Ceiling Grayish 80% Min. Wool 20% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Panels -1 st Fl Fibrous 331212437-0026 Elevator Lobby Homogeneous 55-27 2x2 Design Ceiling Grayish 75% Min. Wool 25% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Panels -1 st Fl Fibrous 331212431-027 Elevator Lobby Homogeneous 55-28 Plaster Lid -1st FI Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Elevator Non -Fibrous 31 Homogeneous 55-29 Plaster Lid -1st Fl White 10% Cellulose 82% Non-fibrous (other) 8% Chrysotile Elevator Fibrous 331272431-0029 Homogeneous 55-30 Plaster Lid -1st FI Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Elevator 331212431-0030 Christopher Kim (52) Krystyn Gonzales (76) CTI�C� Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repst relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good contlition unless othemiise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/31/2012 17:06:48 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/31/2012 5:06:48 PM 6 ALA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 331 11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 lchummi (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslabaatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/24/12 4:10 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/31/2012 Non -Asbestos Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Description Project: 0588483-2 /Office Bldg./ 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA % Fibrous °% Non -Fibrous Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous °% Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -31 -Sheet Flooring Gy Sheet Gray/Beige 15% Cellulose 85% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected FI/Mastic/Blk Fibrous 331212431-0031 Mastic-SuiteA- Heterogeneous Bathroom 55 -31 -Mastic Gy Sheet Tan/Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected FI/Mastic/Blk Non -Fibrous 331212431-0031A Mastic-SuiteA- Heterogeneous Bathroom 55 -32 -Joint DW/JC-1st Fl White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Compound Throughout -Suite Non -Fibrous 331212431-0032 F Wall Homogeneous 55 -32 -Drywall DW/JC-1 st Fl BrownlWhite 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout -Suite Fibrous 331212431-0032A F Wall Heterogeneous 55 -33 -Joint DW/JC-1 st Fl White 100% Non-fibrous(other) <1% Chrysotile Compound Throughout -Suite Non -Fibrous D Wall 331212431-0033 Homogeneous 55 -33 -Drywall DW/JC-1st FI Brown ite 12% Cellulose 88% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout -Suite Fibrous 331212431-W33A D Wall Heterogeneous 55 -34 -Joint DW/JC-1stA White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Compound Throughout -Suite Non -Fibrous 331212431-0034 A W all Homogeneous Christopher Kim (52) Krystyn Gonzales (76) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repst relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good contlition unless othemiise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/31/2012 17:06:48 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/31/2012 5:06:48 PM 7 ALA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 331 11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 Phonmi (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslabaatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/24/12 4:10 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/31/2012 Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Sample Project: 0588483-2 /Office Bldg./ 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA Appearance Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Methods) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -34 -Drywall DW/JC-1 stA BrownlWhite 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout -Suite Fibrous 331212431-0034A AWall Heterogeneous 55 -35 -Joint DW/JC-1st Fl White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Compound Throughout -Suite Non -Fibrous 331212431-0035 A Lid Bathroom Homogeneous 55 -35 -Drywall DW/JC-1st Fl BrownlWhite 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout -Suite Fibrous 331212431-0035A A Lid Bathroom Heterogeneous 55 -36 -Finish Coat Plaster Wall -1st FI White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout-SuiteA Non -Fibrous 331212431-0036 Homogeneous 55 -36 -Base Coat Plaster Wall -1 st FI Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout-SuiteA Non -Fibrous 331212431-0036A Homogeneous 55 -37 -Finish Coat Plaster Wall -1st FI White 100% Non-fibrous (other) <1% Chrysotile Throughout -Suite Non -Fibrous 331212431-0037 G. Homogeneous 55 -37 -Base Coat Plaster Wall -1st FI Grayish 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout -Suite Non -Fibrous 331212431-0037A G. Homogeneous 55-41 2x4 Ceiling Panels- Beige 75% Cellulose 15% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite Fibrous 10% Glass 331212431-0036 Homogeneous Christopher Kim (52) Krystyn Gonzales (76) l Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repst relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good contlition unless othemiise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01364-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/31/2012 17:06:48 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/31/2012 5:06:48 PM 8 ALA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 331 11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 Phone/Fax: (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslabaatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/24/12 4:10 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/31/2012 Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Asbestos Project: 0588483-2 /Office Bldg./ 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA Description Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -04 -Shingle Roof Core -Roof- White/Black 10% Glass 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected NW Fibrous 331272431-0039 Heterogeneous 55 -44 -Felt Roof Core -Roof- Black 50% Cellulose 50% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected NW Fibrous 331272431-0039A Homogeneous 55 -05 -Shingle Roof Core -Roof- White/Black 15% Glass 85% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Middle Fibrous 331272431-0040 Heterogeneous 55 -45 -Felt Roof Core -Roof- Black 50% Cellulose 50% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Middle Fibrous 331212431-0040A Homogeneous 55 -46 -Shingle Roof Core -Roof -SE White/Black 15% Glass 85% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Fibrous 331212431-0041 Heterogeneous 55 -46 -Felt Roof Core-Roi Black 50% Cellulose 50% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Fibrous 331212431-0041A Homogeneous 55 -47 -Shingle Roof Core -Roof- Gray/Black 15% Glass 85% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Lower Roof E Fibrous 331272431-0042 Heterogeneous 55 -47 -Felt 1 Roof Core -Roof- Black 15% Glass 85% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Lower Roof E Fibrous 331272431-0042A Homogeneous Christopher Kim (52) Krystyn Gonzales (76) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repst relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good contlition unless othemiise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/31/2012 17:06:48 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/31/2012 5:06:48 PM 9 ALA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 331 11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 Phone/Fax: (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslabaatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/24/12 4:10 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/31/2012 Asbestos Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Appearance Project: 0588483-2 /Office Bldg./ 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA % Type Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -47 -Felt 2 Roof Core -Roof- Brown/Black 15% Cellulose 80% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Lower Roof E Fibrous 5% Glass 331272431-00428 Homogeneous 55-48 Roof Mastic- Black/Silver 94% Non-fibrous (other) 6% Chrysotile Throughout -Pitch Non -Fibrous 331212431-0043 Pocket Homogeneous 55-49 Roof Mastic- Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Throughout -Duct 331212431-0044 Seam 55-50 Roof Mastic- Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Throughout -Vent 331212431-0045 Pipe 55-51 Beige Tread Black/Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Material -1st FI Non -Fibrous 331212431-0046 Balcony -N Homogeneous 55-52 Beige Tread Black/Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Matedal-1 st Fl Non -Fibrous 331212431-0047 Balcony -S Homogeneous 55 -53 -Floor Tile 9" Bge FT/BIk Beige 98% Non-fibrous (other) 2% Chrysotile Mastic -Under Non -Fibrous 331212431-048 Carpet Ste 205- Homogeneous Mtg. Ron. 55 -53 -Mastic 9" Bge FT/BIk Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Mastic -Under Non -Fibrous 331212431-0048A Carpet Ste 205- Homogeneous Mtg. Rm. Christopher Kim (52) Krystyn Gonzales (76) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repst relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears rw responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good contlition unless othemiise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01364-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/31/2012 17:06:48 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/31/2012 5:06:48 PM 10 ALA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 331 11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 Phonmi (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslabaatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/24/12 4:10 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/31/2012 Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Sample Description Project: 0588483-2 /Office Bldg./ 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -54 -Peel N Stick 12" Bge Peel N Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Stick/Wht SF/Blk Non -Fibrous 331212431-0049 Mast-Kit/Stor Homogeneous 55 -54 -Sheet Flooring 12" Bge Peel N White 10% Cellulose 80% Non-fibrous (other) 10% Chrysotile Stick/Wht SF/Blk Fibrous 331212431-0049A Mast-KitlStor Heterogeneous 55 -54 -Mastic 12" Bge Peel N Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Stick/Wht SF/Blk Non -Fibrous 331212431-00498 Mast-Kit/Stor Homogeneous 55-55 2x4 Ceiling Panels- Beige 75% Cellulose 20% Nan -fibrous (other) None Detected Suite 205 Fibrous 5% Glass 331212431-weo Homogeneous 55-56 2x4 Ceiling Panels- Beige 75% Cellulose 20% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite 205 Fibrous 5% Glass 331212431-w51 Homogeneous 55 -57 -Finish Coat Plaster Wall -2nd White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected FI Throughout- Non -Fibrous 31 Suite 205 Mtg. Rm. Homogeneous 55 -57 -Base Coat Plaster W all -2nd Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected FI Throughout- Non -Fibrous 331212431-0052A Suite 205 Ml Rm. Homogeneous 55 -58 -Finish Coat Plaster Wall -2nd White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected FI Throughout- Non -Fibrous 331212431-0053 Suite 205 Kitchen Homogeneous Christopher Kim (52) Krystyn Gonzales (76) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repst relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good contlition unless othemiise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/31/2012 17:06:48 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/31/2012 5:06:48 PM 11 ALA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 331 11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 PIrsonsi (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslabaatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/24/12 4:10 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/31/2012 Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Sample Project: 0588483-2 /Office Bldg./ 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA Appearance Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -58 -Base Coat Plaster W all -2nd Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected FI Throughout- Non -Fibrous 331212431-0053A Suite 205 Kitchen Homogeneous 55-64 Plaster Ceiling -2nd Brown/Beige 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected FI Throughout- Fibrous 331212431-0054 Suite 205 Heterogeneous 55-65 Plaster Ceiling -2nd Brown/Beige 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected FI Throughout- Fibrous 331212431-0055 Women's RR Heterogeneous 55 -71 -Skim Coat Plaster Wall -2nd White 100% Nan -fibrous (other) None Detected FI Corridors Non -Fibrous 337212437-005fi Homogeneous 55 -71 -Plaster Plaster Wall -2nd Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected FI Corridors Non -Fibrous 337212437-0058A Homogeneous 55 -72 -Skim Coat Plaster W all -2nd White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected FI Corridors Non -Fibrous 331212431-0057 Homogeneous 55 -72 -Plaster Plaster W all -2nd Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected FI Corridors Non -Fibrous 331272431-0057A Homogeneous 55 -73 -Skim Coat Plaster Wall -2nd White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected FI Corridors Non -Fibrous 331272431-0058 Homogeneous Christopher Kim (52) Krystyn Gonzales (76) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repst relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good contlition unless othemiise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/31/2012 17:06:48 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/31/2012 5:06:48 PM 12 ALA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 331 11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 PIrsonsi (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslabaatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/24/12 4:10 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/31/2012 Non -Asbestos Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Description Project: 0588483-2 /Office Bldg./ 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -73 -Plaster Plaster W all -2nd Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected FI Corridors Non -Fibrous 331272431-0058A Homogeneous 55-74 SOA Plaster White 92% Non-fibrous (other) 8% Chrysotile Ceiling -2nd FI Non -Fibrous 331212431-0059 Corridors Homogeneous 55-75 SOA Plaster Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Ceiling -2nd FI 331212431-0060 Corridors 55-76 SOA Plaster Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Ceiling -2nd FI 331212431-0061 Corridors 55 -77 -Joint DW/JC-3rd FI White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Compound Corridors Non -Fibrous 331212431-0062 Homogeneous 55 -77 -Drywall DW/JC-3rd FI BrownlWhite 12% Cellulose 88% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Corridors Fibrous 331212431-0062A Heterogeneous 55 -78 -Joint DW/JC-3rd Fl White 100% Non-fibrous (other) <1% Chrysotile Compound Corridors Non -Fibrous 331212431-0063 Homogeneous 55 -78 -Drywall DW/JC-3rd FI BrownlWh@e 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Corridors Fibrous 331272431-0063A Heterogeneous Christopher Kim (52) Krystyn Gonzales (76) l Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repst relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good contlition unless othemiise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/31/2012 17:06:48 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/31/2012 5:06:48 PM 13 ALA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 331 11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 Phonmi (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslabaatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/24/12 4:10 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/31/2012 Non -Asbestos Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Description Project: 0588483-2 /Office Bldg./ 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -79 -Joint DW/JC-3rd FI White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Compound Corridors Non -Fibrous 331212431-0064 Homogeneous 55 -79 -Drywall DW/JC-3rd FI White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Corridors Non -Fibrous 331212431-0069A Homogeneous 55-80 SOA Plaster White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Ceiling -3rd FI Non -Fibrous 331212431 -WW Elevator Lobby Homogeneous 55-81 SOA Plaster White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Ceiling -3rd FI Non -Fibrous 331212431-0066 Elevator Lobby Homogeneous 55-82 SOA Plaster White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Ceiling -3rd FI Non -Fibrous 331212431-0067 Elevator Lobby Homogeneous 55 -83 -Acoustic SOA DW Ceiling- White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 3rd FI Corridors Non -Fibrous 331212431-0068 Homogeneous 55 -83 -Drywall SOA DW Ceiling- Brown/White 12% Cellulose 88% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 3rd FI Corridors Fibrous 331212431-0068A Heterogeneous 55 -84 -Acoustic SOA DW Ceiling- White 100% Non-fibrous (other) <1% Chrysotile 3rd FI Corridors Non -Fibrous 331212431-0089 Homogeneous Christopher Kim (52) Krystyn Gonzales (76) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repst relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL mcomm ends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good contlition unless othemiise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/31/2012 17:06:48 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/31/2012 5:06:48 PM 14 ALA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 331 11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 Phone/Fax: (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslabaatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/24/12 4:10 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/31/2012 Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Sample Project: 0588483-2 /Office Bldg./ 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA Appearance Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Methods) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -84 -Drywall SOA DW Ceiling- BrownlWhite 12% Cellulose 88% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 3rd FI Corridors Fibrous 331272431-0069A Heterogeneous 55-85 SOA DW Ceiling- White 100% Non-fibrous (other) <1% Chrysotile 3rd FI Corridors Non -Fibrous 331272431-0070 Homogeneous 55-86 2x4 PH Ceiling Beige 75% Cellulose 10% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Panels -3rd FI Fibrous 15% Min. Wool 331212431-0071 Corridors Homogeneous 55-87 2x4 PH Ceiling Beige 70% Min. Wool 30% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Par ls-3rd FI Fibrous 331212431-0072 Corridors Homogeneous 55-88 2x4 PH Ceiling Brown 90% Cellulose 10% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Pari ls-3rd FI Fibrous 331212431-0073 Corridors Homogeneous 55-89 Brn Base Cove Brown/Tan 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Mastic-Throughcut- Non -Fibrous 31 2nd FI Corridors Heterogeneous 55-90 Brn Base Cove Brown/Tan 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Mastic -Throughout- Non -Fibrous 331212431-0075 2nd FI Corridors Heterogeneous 55 -92 -Floor Tile Bge FT/Blk Mastic- Tan 92% Non-fibrous (other) 8% Chrysotile Under Carpet 2nd Non -Fibrous 331212431-0077 FI Corridors Homogeneous Christopher Kim (52) Krystyn Gonzales (76) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repst relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good contlition unless othemiise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/31/2012 17:06:48 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/31/2012 5:06:48 PM 15 ALA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 331 11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 Phone/Fax: (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslabaatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/24/12 4:10 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/31/2012 Non -Asbestos Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Description Project: 0588483-2 /Office Bldg./ 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -92 -Mastic Bge FT/BIk Mastic- Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Under Carpet 2nd Non -Fibrous 331212431-0077A FI Corridors Homogeneous 55-93 Tan/BIk Mastic- Tan/Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Under Carpet 3rd Non -Fibrous 331212431-0078 FI Corridor Heterogeneous 55-94 Tan/BIk Mastic- Tan/Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Under Carpet 3rd Non -Fibrous 331212431-0079 FI Corridor Homogeneous 55 -95 -Felt Brn Cementious Black 15% Glass 85% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Material -3rd FI Fibrous 331212431-0080 Balcony Homogeneous 55 -95 -Texture 1 Brn Cementious Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Material -3rd FI Non -Fibrous 331212431-0080A Balcony Homogeneous 55 -95 -Texture 2 Brn Cementious Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Material -3rd FI Non -Fibrous 331212431-0oaoe Balcony Homogeneous 55-96-Fe8 Brn Cementious Black 15% Glass 85% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Material -3rd FI Fibrous 331212431-0081 Balcony Homogeneous 55 -96 -Texture 1 Brn Cementious Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Material -3rd FI Non -Fibrous 331212431-008IA Balcony Homogeneous Christopher Kim (52) Krystyn Gonzales (76) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repst relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good contlition unless othemiise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/31/2012 17:06:48 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/31/2012 5:06:48 PM 16 ALA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 331 11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 PIrsonsi (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslabaatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/24/12 4:10 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/31/2012 Asbestos Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Appearance Project: 0588483-2 /Office Bldg./ 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA % Type Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -96 -Texture 2 Brn Cementious Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Material -3rd FI Non -Fibrous 331212431 -poste Balcony Homogeneous 55 -97 -Texture Float Material -3rd White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected FI Material Non -Fibrous 331272431-0082 Homogeneous 55 -97 -Floor Tile Float Material -3rd Brown 93% Non-fibrous (other) 7% Chrysotile FI Material Non -Fibrous 331272431-0082A Homogeneous 55-98 Float Material -3rd White 100% Nan -fibrous (other) None Detected FI Material Non -Fibrous 331212431-0083 Homogeneous No Tile present 55 -99 -Drywall DW/JC-3rd FI Brown/White 10% Cellulose 90% Nan -fibrous (other) None Detected Suite -Suite 360 Fibrous <1% Glass 331212431-0089 Heterogeneous 55 -99 -Joint DW/JC-3rd FI White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Compound Suite -Suite 360 Non -Fibrous 331212431-0064A Homogeneous 55 -100 -Drywall DW/JC-3rd FI Brown/White 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite -Suite 360 Fibrous 331212431-0085 Heterogeneous Christopher Kim (52) Krystyn Gonzales (76) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repst relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears rw responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good contlition unless othemiise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/31/2012 17:06:48 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/31/2012 5:06:48 PM 17 ALA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 331 11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CuStome32PRSV2PRSV78 Phone/Fax: (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslabaatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/24/12 4:10 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/31/2012 Asbestos Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous Project: 0588483-2 /Office Bldg./ 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA 55 -100 -Joint Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -100 -Joint DW/JC-3rd FI White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Compound Suite -Suite 360 Non -Fibrous 331212431-008.5A Homogeneous 55-101 2x4 New Ceiling Beige 60% Cellulose 30% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Panels -3rd FI Fibrous 10% Glass 331212431-0086 Suite -Suite 360 Homogeneous 55-102 2x4 New Ceiling Beige 60% Cellulose 30% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Panels -3rd FI Fibrous 10% Glass 331212431-0087 Suite -Suite 360 Homogeneous 55-103 Cork Material/Glue- Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 3rd FI Suite -Suite Fibrous 331212431-0086 360 Homogeneous 55-104 Blk Cementious FI Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Material -Under Non -Fibrous 331212431-6689 Carpet 3rd Suite Homogeneous Christopher Kim (52) Krystyn Gonzales (76) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repst relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good contlition unless othemiise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/31/2012 17:06:48 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/31/20125:06:48 PM THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT. 18 LA Testing Cu mrl D: Testing Order: 3S88 11652 Knoll Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92641 CUstoe32PR2PRSV78 Phone/Fax: (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 CustomerPO: TESTING losalamitoslabnolatestina.min Project)D: The Wieland-Davc Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/04/12 5:50 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/11/2012 Collected: 8/28/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 Project: 0588483-2 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Office Bldg 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 7-55-105 Plaster Ceiling/ White 95% Non-fibrous (other) 5% Chrysotile Throughout /Suits Fibrous 331212788-0001 B Homogeneous 22-55-59 Plaster Wall / 2nd White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 331212780-0002 Floor / Suite 225 Non -Fibrous Homogeneous 22 -55 -60 -Finish Plaster Wall / 2nd White 98% Non-fibrous (other) 2% Chrysotile Coat Floor / Suite 265 Non -Fibrous 331212788-0003 Homogeneous 22 -55 -60 -Base Plaster Wall / 2nd Grayish 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat Floor / Suite 265 Non -Fibrous 331212781 Homogeneous 22 -55 -61 -Finish Plaster Wall / 2nd White 100% Non-fibrous (other) <1% Chrysotile Coat Floor / Suite 235 Non -Fibrous 331212788-0004 Homogeneous 22 -55 -61 -Base Plaster Wall / 2nd Grayish 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat Floor / Suite 235 Non -Fibrous 331212788-0004A Homogeneous 22 -55 -62 -Finish Plaster Wall / 2nd White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat Floor / Suite 240 Non -Fibrous 331212786-0005 Homogeneous Analyst(s) Christopher Kim (31) Krystyn Gonzales (36) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility far sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Code 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/11/2012 14:49:19 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/11/2012 2:49:19 PM 1 LA Testing Cu mrl D: Testing Order: 3S88 11652 Knoll Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92641 CUstoe32PR2PRSV78 Phone/Fax: (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 CustomerPO: TESTING losalamitoslabnolatestina.min Project)D: The Wieland-Davc Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/04/12 5:50 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/11/2012 Collected: 8/28/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 Project: 0588483-2 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Office Bldg 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 22 -55 -62 -Base Plaster Wall / 2nd Grayish 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat Floor / Suite 240 Non -Fibrous 331212788-0005A Homogeneous 22-55-63 Plaster Wall / 2nd White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Floor/Utility Non -Fibrous 331212788-0006 Closet Heterogeneous Unable to separate finish dastard base coat 22 -55 -106 -Finish Plaster Wall / 2nd White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat Floor / Suite 286 Non -Fibrous 331212788-0007 Homogeneous 22 -55 -106 -Base Plaster Wall / 2nd Grayish 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat Floor / Suite 286 Non -Fibrous 331212788-0007A Homogeneous 22 -55 -107 -Finish Plaster Wall / 2nd White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat Floor / Suite 280 Non -Fibrous 331212788-0008 Homogeneous 22 -55 -107 -Base Plaster Wall / 2nd Grayish 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat Floor / Suite 280 Non -Fibrous 331212788-0008A Homogeneous 55 -22 -108 -Finish Palster Wall / 2nd White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat Floor/Suite Non -Fibrous 331212788-0009 270/250 Homogeneous Analyst(s) Christopher Kim (31) Krystyn Gonzales (36) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility far sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Code 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/11/2012 14:49:19 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/11/2012 2:49:19 PM 2 LA Testing Cu mrl D: Testing Order: 3S88 11652 Knoll Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92641 CUstoe32PR2PRSV78 Phone/Fax: (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 CustomerPO: TESTING losalamitoslabiddatestina.com Project)D: The Wieland-Davc Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/04/12 5:50 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/11/2012 Collected: 8/28/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 Project: 0588483-2 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Office Bldg 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -22 -108 -Base Palster Wall / 2nd Grayish 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coal Floor/Suite Non -Fibrous 331212788-0009A 270/250 Homogeneous 22 -55 -109 -Finish Plaster Wall / 2nd White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat Floor / Suite 275 Non -Fibrous 331212788-0010 Homogeneous 22 -55 -109 -Base Plaster Wall / 2nd Grayish 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat Floor / Suite 275 Non -Fibrous 331212788-OOIOA Homogeneous 22 -55 -110 -Finish Plaster Wall / 2nd White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat Floor / Suite 200 Non -Fibrous 331212788-0011 Homogeneous 22 -55 -110 -Base Plaster Wall / 2nd Grayish 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat Floor / Suite 200 Non -Fibrous 331212786-OOIIA Homogeneous 23-55-66 Plaster Ceiling / White/Beige 10% Cellulose 85% Non-fibrous (other) 5% Chrysotile 2nd Floor/ Suite Fibrous 331212786-0012 225 Homogeneous 23-55-67 Plaster Ceiling / White 95% Non-fibrous (other) 5% Chrysotile 2nd Floor/ Suite Fibrous 331212786-0013 265 Homogeneous Analyst(s) Christopher Kim (31) Krystyn Gonzales (36) As`Caf`-� Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility far sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Code 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/11/2012 14:49:19 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/11/2012 2:49:19 PM 3 LA Testing Cu mrl D: Testing Order: 3S88 11652 Knoll Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92641 CUstoe32PR2PRSV78 Phone/Fax: (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 CustomerPO: TESTING losalamitoslabnolatestina.min Project)D: The Wieland-Davc Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/04/12 5:50 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/11/2012 Collected: 8/28/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 Project: 0588483-2 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Office Bldg 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 23-55-68 Plaster Ceiling / Beige 92% Non-fibrous (other) 8% Chrysotile 2nd Floor / Suite Fibrous 331212788-0014 235 Homogeneous 23-55-69 Plaster Ceiling / Beige 92% Non-fibrous (other) 8% Chrysotile 2nd Floor / Suite Fibrous 331212788-0015 270/250 Homogeneous 23-55-70 Plaster Ceiling / Beige 94% Non-fibrous (other) 6% Chrysotile 2nd Floor/ Suite Fibrous 331212788-0016 275 Homogeneous 23-55-70A Plaster Ceiling / Beige 93% Non-fibrous (other) 7% Chrysotile 2nd Floor / Suite Fibrous 331212788-0017 200 Homogeneous 39-55-111 2x4 New Ceiling Beige 75% Cellulose 10% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 331212788-0018 Panels / Suite 245 Fibrous 15% Glass Homogeneous 39-55-112 2x4 New Ceiling Beige 75% Cellulose 15% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 331212788-0019 Panels / Suite 265 Fibrous 10% Glass Homogeneous 39-55-113 2x4 New Ceiling Beige 75% Cellulose 15% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 331212788-0020 Panels / Suite 286 Fibrous 10% Glass Homogeneous 39-55-114 2x4 New Ceiling Beige 75% Cellulose 15% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 331212788-0021 Panels / Suite 210 Fibrous 10% Glass Homogeneous Analyst(s) Christopher Kim (31) Krystyn Gonzales (36) As`Caf`-� Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility far sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Code 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/11/2012 14:49:19 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/11/2012 2:49:19 PM 4 LA Testing Cu mrl D: Testing Order: 3S88 11652 Knoll Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92641 CUstoe32PR2PRSV78 Phone/Fax: (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 CustomerPO: TESTING losalamitoslabnolatestina.min Project)D: The Wieland-Davc Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/04/12 5:50 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/11/2012 Collected: 8/28/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 Project: 0588483-2 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Office Bldg 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 15-55-42 2x4 Ceiling Beige 75% Cellulose 15% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 331212780-0022 Panels / Suite B Fibrous 10% Glass Homogeneous 8-55-115 2x4 Squiggle Pin Beige 70% Cellulose 15% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Hole Ceiling Fibrous 15% Glass 331212788-0023 Panels / Suite 255 Homogeneous 40 -55 -116 -Ceiling 1x1 Large Dot Tan 100% Cellulose 0% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Tile Ceiling Panels- Fibrous 331212788-0024 Glue / Suite 225 Homogeneous 40 -55 -116 -Mastic 1x1 Large Dot Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) <1% Anthophyllite Ceiling Panels- Non -Fibrous 331212788-0024A Glue / Suite 225 Homogeneous 40 -55 -117 -Ceiling 1x1 Large Dot Tan 100% Cellulose 0% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Tile Ceiling Panels- Fibrous 331212788-0025 Glue / Suite 225 Homogeneous 40 -55 -117 -Mastic 1x1 Large Dot Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) <1% Anthophyllite Ceiling Panels- Non -Fibrous 331212781 Glue / Suite 225 Homogeneous 41 -55 -118 -Joint Drywall -Joint White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Compound Comp / Suite 225 Non -Fibrous 331212788-0026 Homogeneous Analyst(s) Christopher Kim (31) Krystyn Gonzales (36) As`Caf`-� Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility far sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Code 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/11/2012 14:49:19 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/11/2012 2:49:19 PM 5 LA Testing Cu mrl D: Testing Order: 3S88 11652 Knoll Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92641 CUstoe32PR2PRSV78 Phone/Fax: (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 CustomerPO: TESTING losalamitoslabiddatestina.com Project)D: The Wieland-Davc Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/04/12 5:50 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/11/2012 Collected: 8/28/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 Project: 0588483-2 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Office Bldg 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 41 -55 -118 -Drywall Drywall -Joint Brown/White 15% Cellulose 85% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 331212789-0028A Comp / Suite 225 Fibrous <1% Glass Heterogeneous 41 -55 -119 -Joint Drywall -Joint White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Compound Comp / Suite 265 Non -Fibrous 331212788-0027 Homogeneous 41 -55 -119 -Drywall Drywall -Joint Brown/White 15% Cellulose 85% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Comp / Suite 265 Fibrous <1% Glass 331212788-0027A Heterogeneous 41 -55 -120 -Joint Drywall -Joint White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Compound Comp / Suite 285 Non -Fibrous 331212788-0028 Homogeneous 41 -55 -120 -Drywall Drywall -Joint Brown/White 15% Cellulose 85% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Comp / Suite 285 Fibrous 331212788-0028A Heterogeneous 41 -55 -121 -Joint Drywall -Joint White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Compound Comp / Suite 230 Non -Fibrous 331212788-0029 Homogeneous 41 -55 -121 -Drywall Drywall -Joint Brown/White 12% Cellulose 88% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 331212788-0029A Comp / Suite 230 Fibrous Heterogeneous Analyst(s) Christopher Kim (31) Krystyn Gonzales (36) As`Caf`-� Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility far sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Code 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/11/2012 14:49:19 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/11/2012 2:49:19 PM 6 LA Testing Cu mr/ D: Testing Order: 3S88 11652 Knoll Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92641 Custoe32PR2PRSV78 Phone/Fax: (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 CustomerPO: TESTING losalamitoslabiddatestina.com Project)D: The Wieland-Davc Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/04/12 5:50 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/11/2012 Collected: 8/28/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 Project: 0588483-2 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Office Bldg 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 41 -55 -122 -Joint Drywall -Joint White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Compound Comp / Suite 210 Non -Fibrous 331212788-0030 Homogeneous 41 -55 -122 -Drywall Drywall -Joint Brown/White 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Comp / Suite 210 Fibrous 331212788-0030A Heterogeneous 41 -55 -123 -Joint Drywall -Joint White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Compound Comp / Suite 210 Non -Fibrous 331212788-0031 Homogeneous 41 -55 -123 -Drywall Drywall -Joint Brown/White 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Comp / Suite 210 Fibrous 331212788-0031A Heterogeneous 42 -55 -124 -Floor 9" Brown FT- Brown 90% Non-fibrous (other) 10% Chrysotile Tile Black Mastic/ Non -Fibrous 331212788-0032 Suite 245 Homogeneous 42 -55 -124 -Mastic 9" Brown FT- Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Black Mastic / Non -Fibrous 331212788-0032A Suite 245 Homogeneous 42 -55 -125 -Floor 9" Brown FT- Brown 90% Non-fibrous (other) 10% Chrysotile Tile Black Mastic / Non -Fibrous 331212788-0033 Suite 265 Homogeneous Analyst(s) Christopher Kim (31) Krystyn Gonzales (36) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility far sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Code 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/11/2012 14:49:19 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/11/2012 2:49:19 PM 7 LA Testing Cu mrl D: Testing Order: 3S88 11652 Knoll Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92641 CUstoe32PR2PRSV78 Phone/Fax: (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 CustomerPO: TESTING losalamitoslabnolatestina.min Project)D: The Wieland-Davc Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/04/12 5:50 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/11/2012 Collected: 8/28/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 Project: 0588483-2 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Office Bldg 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 42 -55 -125 -Mastic 9" Brown FT- Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Black Mastic / Non -Fibrous 331212788-0033A Suite 285 Homogeneous 42 -55 -126 -Floor 9" Brown FT- Tan 92% Non-fibrous (other) 8% Chrysotile Tile Black Mastic/ Non -Fibrous 331212788-0034 Suite 2701250 Homogeneous 42 -55 -126 -Mastic 9" Brown FT- Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Black Mastic/ Non -Fibrous 331212788-0034A Suite 270/250 Homogeneous 43 -55 -127 -Floor 9" Beige FT -Black Pink 90% Non-fibrous (other) 10% Chrysotile Tile Mastic / Suite 240 Non -Fibrous 331212788-0035 Homogeneous 43 -55 -127 -Mastic 9" Beige FT -Black Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Mastic / Suite 240 Non -Fibrous 331212788-0035A Heterogeneous 43 -55 -128 -Floor 9" Beige FT -Black Pink 90% Non-fibrous (other) 10% Chrysotile Tile Mastic / Suite 235 Non -Fibrous 331212788-0036 Homogeneous 43 -55 -128 -Mastic 9" Beige FT -Black Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 331212788-0036A Mastic / Suite 235 Non -Fibrous Homogeneous Analyst(s) Christopher Kim (31) Krystyn Gonzales (36) As`Caf`-� Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility far sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Code 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/11/2012 14:49:19 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/11/2012 2:49:19 PM 8 LA Testing Cu Testing Order: 3S88 11652 Knoll Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92641 CUstomerl D: 32PR2PRSV78 Phone/Fax: (714) 828-49991(714) 828-4944 CustomerPO: TESTING losalamitoslabldlatestina.corn Project)D: The Wieland-Davc Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/04/12 5:50 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/11/2012 Collected: 8/28/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 Project: 0588483-2 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Office Bldg 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Type 44-55-129-Floor 9" Mosaic Beige Beige 95% Non-fibrous (other) 5% Chrysotile Tile FT-Black Mastic / Non-Fibrous 331212788-0037 Suite 280 Homogeneous 44-55-129-Mastic 9" Mosaic Beige Black 94% Non-fibrous (other) 6% Chrysotile FT-Black Mastic / Non-Fibrous 331212788-0037A Suite 280 Homogeneous 45-55-130-Floor 9" Lite Green FT- Green 92% Non-fibrous (other) 8% Chrysotile Tile Black Mastic/ Non-Fibrous 331212788-0038 Suite 255 Homogeneous 45-55-130-Mastic 9" Lite Green FT- Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Black Mastic/ Non-Fibrous 331212788-003M Suite 255 Homogeneous 46-55-131 12" White FT- White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Mastic / Suite 280 Non-Fibrous 331212788-0039 Homogeneous Unable to separate mastic 47-55-132 Brown Carpet Brown/Red 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 331212788-0040 Mastic / Suite 275 Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous Result includes a small amount of Inseparable material 47-55-133 Brown Carpet Brown/Red 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Mastic / Suite 275 Non-Fibrous 331212788-0041 Heterogeneous Result includes a small amount of Inseparable material Analyst(s) Christopher Kim (31) Krystyn Gonzales (36) CS l"C� Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility far sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certificated, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Code 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/11/2012 14:49:19 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/11/2012 2:49:19 PM 9 LA Testing Cu mrl D: Testing Order: 3S88 11652 Knoll Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92641 CUstoe32PR2PRSV78 Phone/Fax: (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 CustomerPO: TESTING losalamitoslabnolatestina.min Project)D: The Wieland-Davc Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/04/12 5:50 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/11/2012 Collected: 8/28/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 Project: 0588483-2 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Office Bldg 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 48-55-134 Tan Carpet Tan 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 331212181 Mastic / Suite 225 Non -Fibrous Homogeneous 48-55-135 Tan Carpet Tan 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 331212188-0043 Mastic / Suite 225 Non -Fibrous Homogeneous 49-55-136 Float Material / White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Under Carpet Non -Fibrous 331212788-0044 Suite 265 Homogeneous Analyst(s) Christopher Kim (31) Krystyn Gonzales (36) As`Caf`-� Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility far sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 10 Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Code 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/11/2012 14:49:19 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/11/20122:49:19 PM THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT. 10 LA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 392 ji11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 Alchonei (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslaba atestinoc com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)454-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/05/12 8:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/12/2012 Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Sample Project: 0588483-2 / Office Building 13355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA Appearance Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -137 -Drywall DW/JC- TanlWhite 12% Cellulose 88% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout 3rd Fibrous 331212892-0001 FI/Suite 300 Heterogeneous 55 -137 -Joint DW/JC- White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Compound Throughout 3rd Non -Fibrous FI/Suite 300 331212892-0001A Homogeneous 55 -138 -Drywall DW/JC- Tan/White 12% Cellulose 88% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout 3rd Fibrous 331212892-0002 FI/SuRe 300 Heterogeneous 55 -138 -Joint DW/JC- White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Compound Throughout 3rd Non -Fibrous 33121281 FI/Sufte 300 Homogeneous 55 -139 -Drywall DWlJC- TanlWhite 12% Cellulose 88% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout 3rd Fibrous 33121281 FI/Suile 325 E Wall Heterogeneous 55 -139 -Joint DW/JC- White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Compound Throughout 3rd Non -Fibrous FI/Suile 325 E Wall 331212892-0003A Homogeneous 55 -140 -Drywall DW/JC- Tan/White 15% Cellulose 85% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout 3rd Fibrous 331212892-0004 FI/Suile 34500 Heterogeneous Wall Christopher Kim (12) Krystyn Gonzales (12) Jeffrey Deboo (57) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repot relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by Ne client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grope, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/12/2012 07:57:27 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/12/2012 7:57:27 AM 1 LA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 392 ji11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 APhone/Fax: (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslaba atestinoc com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)454-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/05/12 8:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/12/2012 Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Sample Project: 0588483-2 /Office Building 13355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA Appearance Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -140 -Joint DW/JC- White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Compound Throughout 3rd Non -Fibrous FI/Suite 345W 331212892-0004A Wall Homogeneous 55 -141 -Drywall DW/JC- Tan/White 12% Cellulose 88% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout 3rd Fibrous 331212892 -WW FI/Sufte 365E Wall Heterogeneous 55 -141 -Joint DW/JC- White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Compound Throughout 3rd Non -Fibrous 33121281 FI/SuRe 365 E Wall Homogeneous 55 -142 -Drywall DW/JC- Tan/White 12% Cellulose 88% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout 3rd Fibrous 331212892-0006 FI/Middle N/E Wall Heterogeneous 55 -142 -Joint DWlJC- White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Compound Throughout 3rd Non -Fibrous FI/Middle N/E Wall 331212892-0006A Homogeneous 55 -143 -Drywall DW/JC- TanNJhite 12% Cellulose 88% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout 3rd Fibrous 331212892-0007 FI/Middle Other Heterogeneous Side 355 55 -143 -Joint DW/JC- White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Compound Throughout 3rd Non -Fibrous FI/Middle Other 331212892-0007A Side 355 Homogeneous Christopher Kim (12) Krystyn Gonzales (12) Jeffrey Deboo (57) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repot relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grope, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/12/2012 07:57:27 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/12/2012 7:57:27 AM 2 LA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 392 ji11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 APhone/Fax: (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslaba atestinoc com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)454-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/05/12 8:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/12/2012 Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Sample Project: 0588483-2 / Office Building 13355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA Appearance Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -144 -Drywall DW/JC- TanlWhite 12% Cellulose 88% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout 3rd Fibrous 331212892-0008 FI/Suite 374 S Wall Heterogeneous 55 -144 -Joint DW/JC- White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Compound Throughout 3rd Non -Fibrous 331212892-OODBA FI/Suite 374 S Wall Homogeneous 55 -145 -Joint DW/JC- White 100% Non-fibrous(other) <1% Chrysotile Compound Throughout 3rd Non -Fibrous 331212892-0009 FI/Suite 340S Wall Homogeneous 55 -145 -Drywall DW/JC- BrovmlWhi[e 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout 3rd Fibrous 331212892-0009A FI/Sude 340S Wall Heterogeneous 55 -146 -Joint DWlJC- White 100% Non-fibrous (other) <1% Chrysotile Compound Throughout 3rd Non -Fibrous 331212892-0010 FI/Suile 330 E Wall Homogeneous 55 -146 -Drywall Di Brown/White 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout 3rd Fibrous 331212892-0010A FI/Suile 330 E Wall Heterogeneous 55 -147 -Joint DW/JC- White 100% Non-fibrous(other) <1% Chrysotile Compound Throughout 3rd Non -Fibrous 331212892-0011 FI/Suile 350W Wall Homogeneous Christopher Kim (12) Krystyn Gonzales (12) Jeffrey Deboo (57) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repot relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by Ne client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grope, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/12/2012 07:57:27 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/12/2012 7:57:27 AM 3 LA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 392 ji11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 Alchonei (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslaba atestinoc com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)454-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/05/12 8:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/12/2012 Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Sample Project: 0588483-2 / Office Building 13355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA Appearance Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -147 -Drywall DW/JC- Brown/White 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout 3rd Fibrous 331212892-001IA FI/Suite 350W Heterogeneous Wall 55 -148 -Joint DW/JC- White 100% Non-fibrous (other) -t1% Chrysotile Compound Throughout 3rd Non -Fibrous FI/Suite 316 E Wall 331212892-0012 Homogeneous 55 -148 -Drywall DW/JC- BrovmlWhi[e 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout 3rd Fibrous 33121281 FI/Sude 316E Wall Heterogeneous 55 -149 -Ceiling Tile 1x1 Plain Whit CT- Tan 95% Cellulose 5% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite 305 Fibrous 33121281 Homogeneous 55 -149 -Glue 1x1 Plain Whit CT- Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite 305 Non -Fibrous 33121281 Homogeneous 55 -149 -Plaster 1x1 Plain Wht CT- White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite 305 Non -Fibrous 331272892-00138 Homogeneous 55 -150 -Ceiling Tile Glue/Plaster/BB- Tan 95% Cellulose 5% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite 305 Fibrous 331212892-0014 Homogeneous 55 -150 -Glue Glue/Plaster/BB- Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite 305 Non -Fibrous 331212892-0014A Homogeneous Christopher Kim (12) Krystyn Gonzales (12) Jeffrey Deboo (57) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repot relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grope, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/12/2012 07:57:27 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/12/2012 7:57:27 AM 4 LA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 392 ji11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 Alchonei (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslaba atestinoc com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)454-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/05/12 8:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/12/2012 Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Sample Project: 0588483-2 /Office Building 13355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA Appearance Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -150 -Plaster Glue/Plaster/BB- White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite 305 Non -Fibrous 331272892-00748 Homogeneous 55 -151 -Ceiling Tile 1x1 CT/Glue-Suite Gray 80% Glass 17% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 340 Fibrous 3% Cellulose 331272892-0075 Homogeneous 55 -151 -Glue 1x1 CT/Glue-Suite Brown 100% Non-fibrous(other) None Detected 340 Non -Fibrous; 331272892-0015A Homogeneous 55 -152 -Ceiling Tile 1x1 CT/Glue-Suite Grayish 80% Glass 16% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 340 Fibrous 4% Cellulose 331212892-0016 Homogeneous 55 -152 -Glue 1x1 CT/Glue-Suite Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 3 40 Non -Fibrous 331212892-0016A Homogeneous 55-153 Orange SF/Mastic- Brown/Cream/Gray 40% Cellulose 35% Non-fibrous (other) 25% Chrysotile Suite 310 ish Fibrous 331212892-0017 Heterogeneous Unable to separate mastic from flooding for analysis. 55 -154 -Ceiling Tile Cork CT/Glue- Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite 320 Non -Fibrous 331272892-0018 Homogeneous 55 -154 -Mastic Cork CT/Glue- Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) <1% Anthophyllite Suite 320 Non -Fibrous 331272892-0018A Homogeneous Christopher Kim (12) Krystyn Gonzales (12) Jeffrey Deboo (57) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repot relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by Ne client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grope, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/12/2012 07:57:27 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/12/2012 7:57:27 AM 5 LA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 392 ji11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 APhone/Fax: (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslaba atestinoc com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)454-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/05/12 8:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/12/2012 Asbestos Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Appearance Project: 0588483-2 /Office Building 13355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA % Type Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -155 -Cork Cork CT/Glue- Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite 320 Non -Fibrous 331272892-0019 Homogeneous 55 -155 -Mastic Cork CT/Glue- Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) <1% Anthophyllite Suite 320 Non -Fibrous 331272892-0019A Homogeneous 55 -156 -Shingle Roof Core -Middle White/Black 12% Glass 88% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Roof Fibrous 331272892-0020 Heterogeneous 55 -156 -Roofing Roof Core -Middle Black 10% Glass 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Roof Fibrous 331212892-0020A Heterogeneous 55-156-Felt/Mastic Roof Core -Middle 60% Cellulose 40% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Roof Fibrous 331212892-00208 Heterogeneous Unable to separete felt antl mastic layers for analysis. 55 -157 -Shingle Roof Core -Middle W hite/Black 10% Glass 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Roof Fibrous 331212892-0021 Heterogeneous 55 -157 -Roofing Roof Core -Middle Black 8% Glass 89% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Roof Fibrous 3% Cellulose 331212892-0021A Heterogeneous 55-157-Felt/Mastic Roof Core -Middle Black 50% Cellulose 50% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Roof Fibrous 331212892-00218 Heterogeneous Unable to separate felt and mastic layers for analysis. Christopher Kim (12) Krystyn Gonzales (12) Jeffrey Deboo (57) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repot relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by Ne client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL mccrnm ends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grope, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/12/2012 07:57:27 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/12/2012 7:57:27 AM 6 LA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 392 ji11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 Alchonei (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslaba atestinoc com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)454-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/05/12 8:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/12/2012 Asbestos Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Appearance Project: 0588483-2 /Office Building 13355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA % Type Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -158 -Mastic 1 Carpet Mastic/9" Cream 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Grin FT/Mastic- Non -Fibrous 331212892-0022 Suite 300 Homogeneous 55 -158 -Floor Tile Carpet Mastic/9" Green 88% Non-fibrous(other) 12% Chrysotile Grin FT/Mastic- Non -Fibrous 331212892-0022A Suite 300 Homogeneous 55 -158 -Mastic 2 Carpet Mastic/9" Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Grin FT/Mastic- Non -Fibrous 331212892-00228 Suite 300 Homogeneous 55 -158 -Leveling Carpet Mastic/9" White 100%Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Compound Grin FT/Mastic- Non -Fibrous 331212892-0022C Suite 300 Homogeneous 55 -159 -Mastic 1 Carpet Mastic/9" Yellow 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected W ht FT/Mastic- Non -Fibrous 331212892-0023 Suite 300 Homogeneous 55 -159 -Floor Tile Carpet Mastic/9" Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) W ht FT/Mastic- 33121281 Suite 300 55 -159 -Mastic 2 Carpet Mastic/9" Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected W ht FT/Mastic- Non -Fibrous 331212892-0023B Suite 300 Homogeneous 55 -160 -Mastic 1 Carpet Mastic/9" Tan 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Brn FT/Mastic- Non -Fibrous 331212892-0024 Suite 300 Homogeneous Christopher Kim (12) Krystyn Gonzales (12) Jeffrey Deboo (57) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repot relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears rw responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by Ne client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grope, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/12/2012 07:57:27 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/12/2012 7:57:27 AM 7 LA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 392 ji11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 APhonei (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslaba atestinoc com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davoo Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)454-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/05/12 8:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/12/2012 Asbestos Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Appearance Project: 0588483-2 / Office Building 13355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA % Type Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -160 -Floor Tile Carpet Masticl9" Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Brn FT/Mastic- 331212892-024A Suite 300 55 -160 -Mastic 2 Carpet Mastic/9" Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Brn FT/Mastic- Non -Fibrous 331212892-00248 Suite 300 Homogeneous 55-161 Blk Mastic -Under Black 55% Cellulose 42% Non-fibrous (other) 3% Chrysotile Wood FI Suite 365 Fibrous 331212892-0025 Homogeneous 55-162 BIk Mastic -Suite Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 350/372/340 -Suite Non -Fibrous 331212892-0026 350 Homogeneous 55-163 BIk Mastic -Suite Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 320/310/315/370/3 Non -Fibrous 331212892-0027 30 -Suite 372 Homogeneous 55-164 BIk Mastic -Suite Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 320/310/315/370/3 Non -Fibrous 331212892-0028 30 -Suite 340 W Homogeneous 55-165 Bilk Mastic -Suite Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 320/310/315/370/3 Non -Fibrous 331212892-0029 30-Sute 340 E Homogeneous 55-166 BIk Mastic -Suite Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 320/310/315/370/3 Non -Fibrous 331212892-0030 30 -Suite 320 Homogeneous Christopher Kim (12) Krystyn Gonzales (12) Jeffrey Deboo (57) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by Ne client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grope, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/12/2012 07:57:27 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/12/2012 7:57:27 AM 8 LA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 392 ji11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 Alchonei (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslaba atestinoc com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)454-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/05/12 8:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/12/2012 Sample Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 % Type Project: 0588483-2 /Office Building 13355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA Blk Mastic -Suite Black Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55-167 Blk Mastic -Suite Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 3201310/315/370/3 Non -Fibrous 331212892-0031 30 -Suite 310 Homogeneous 55-168 Spray On Acoustic- White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite 310/305- Non -Fibrous 331212892-0032 Suite 310 Homogeneous 55-169 Spray On Acoustic- White/Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite 310/305- Non -Fibrous 331212892-0033 Suite 310 Homogeneous 55-170 Spray On Acoustic- White 100% Nan -fibrous (other) None Detected Suite 310/305- Non -Fibrous 331212892-0034 Suite 305 Homogeneous 55-171 Spray On Acoustic- White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite 310/305- Non -Fibrous 331212892-0035 Suite 305 Homogeneous 55 -172 -Floor Tile 12" W ht FT/Mastic- White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Space Non -Fibrous 33121281Middle Homogeneous 55 -172 -Mastic 12" W ht FT/Mastic- Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Middle Space Non -Fibrous 331272892-0036A Homogeneous 55 -173 -Floor Tile 12" W ht FT/Mastic- White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Middle Space Non -Fibrous 331272892-0037 Homogeneous Christopher Kim (12) Krystyn Gonzales (12) Jeffrey Deboo (57) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repot relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by Ne client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grope, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/12/2012 07:57:27 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/12/2012 7:57:27 AM 9 LA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 392 ji11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRSV2PRSV78 APhone/Fax: (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslaba atestinoc com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)454-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/05/12 8:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/12/2012 Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Sample Project: 0588483-2 /Office Building 13355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA Appearance Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -173 -Mastic 12" W ht FT/Mastic- Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Middle Space Non -Fibrous 331272892-0037A Homogeneous 55 -174 -Floor Tile 9" Lt Grin FT/BIk Green/Grayish 96% Non-fibrous (other) 4% Chrysotile MasticSuite 305 Non -Fibrous 331212892-0038 Under Carpet Homogeneous 55 -174 -Mastic 9" Lt Grin FT/BIk Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Mastic -Suite 305 Non -Fibrous 331212892-0038A Under Carpet Homogeneous 55 -175 -Floor Tile 9" Brn FT/BIk Tan 90% Non-fibrous (other) 10% Chrysotile Mastic -Storage Non -Fibrous 331212892-0039 CloseU3rd FI Homogeneous 55 -175 -Mastic 9" Brn FT/BIk Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Mastic -Storage Non -Fibrous 331212892-0039A Closet/3rd FI Homogeneous 55-176 2x4 Ceiling Panels- Beige 75% Cellulose 15% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite 300 Fibrous 10% Glass 31 Homogeneous 55-177 2x4 Ceiling Panels- Beige 75% Cellulose 10% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite 365 Fibrous 15% Glass 331272892-0041 Homogeneous 55-178 Plaster Ceiling- White/Beige 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous(other) None Detected Suite 300 Fibrous 331272892-0042 Heterogeneous Christopher Kim (12) Krystyn Gonzales (12) Jeffrey Deboo (57) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repot relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears rw responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by Ne client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grope, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/12/2012 07:57:27 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/12/2012 7:57:27 AM 10 LA Testing Cu erlD: Testing Order: 392 ji11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custom32PRSV2PRSV78 Alchormi (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslaba atestimc com ProjeCtlD: The Wieland-Davco Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)454-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/05/12 8:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/12/2012 Non -Asbestos Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Description Project: 0588483-2 /Office Building 13355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55 -179 -Finish Coat Plaster Walls- White 100% Non-fibrous(other) <1% Chrysotile Suite 315 Non -Fibrous 331272892-0043 Homogeneous 55 -179 -Base Coat Plaster W alls- W hite/Grayish 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite 315 Non -Fibrous 331272892-0043A Homogeneous 55 -180 -Finish Coat Plaster W alls- White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite 310 Non -Fibrous 331272892-0049 Homogeneous 55 -180 -Base Coat Plaster Walls- White/Grayish 100%Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite 310 Non -Fibrous 331212892-0049A Homogeneous 55-181 Plaster Walls- White/Grayish 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite 305 Non -Fibrous 331212892-0045 Heterogeneous Unable to separate finish coat and base coat layes for analysis. 55-182 Plaster Walls- BrownlWhite 8% Cellulose 92% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 305 Fibrous 33121281Suite Heterogeneous Christopher Kim (12) Krystyn Gonzales (12) Jeffrey Deboo (57) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repot relates only to the samples reponed and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use ofleslresults are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by Ne client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good contlition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grope, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/12/2012 07:57:27 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/12/20127:57:27 AM THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT. 11 ALA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 331213160 11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRS2PRSV78 PIrsonei (714)828-49991(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslabaatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davoo Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/11/12 3:00 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/14/2012 % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous Collected: 9/7/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 92% Non-fibrous (other) 8% Chrysotile Project: 0588483-2 /The Wieland-Davco Corp I Office Bldg 13355 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Non -Fibrous Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 56 -55 -183 -Floor Tile 9" Green FT -BH / Blue 92% Non-fibrous (other) 8% Chrysotile Suite 290 Under Non -Fibrous 331213160-0001 Carpet Homogeneous 56 -55 -183 -Mastic 9" Green FT -BH / Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite 290 Under Non -Fibrous 331213160-OODIA Carpet Homogeneous 68-55-184 Exterior Plaster / Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 2nd A North West Non -Fibrous 331213160-0002 Wall Homogeneous 68-55-185 Exterior Plaster/ Gray 100% Nan -fibrous (other) None Detected 2nd FI North East Non -Fibrous 331213160 -WO Wall Homogeneous 68-55-186 Exterior Plaster/ Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 2nd FI South West Non -Fibrous 331213160-0004 Wall Homogeneous 69 -55 -187 -Finish Plaster Wall / 1st White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat FI Stairwell Non -Fibrous 331213160-0005 Homogeneous 69 -55 -187 -Base Plaster Wall / 1st Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat FI Stairwell Non -Fibrous 331213160-0005A Homogeneous Christopher Kim (42) Krysti Gonzales (3) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repot relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grope, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/14/2012 14:48:49 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/14/2012 2:48:49 PM 1 ALA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 331213160 11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRS2PRSV78 PIrsonei (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslaba atestinoc com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davoo Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/11/12 3:00 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/14/2012 % Type Collected: 9/7/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Project: 0588483-2 /The Wieland-Davco Corp I Office Bldg 13355 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Non -Fibrous Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 69 -55 -188 -Finish Plaster W all / 3rd White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat FI Stairwell Non -Fibrous 331213160-0006 Homogeneous 69 -55 -188 -Base Plaster W all / 3rd Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat FI Stairwell Non -Fibrous 331213160-001 Homogeneous 70 -55 -189 -Floor Tile Blue FT -Mastic / Blue 100% Nan -fibrous (other) None Detected 1st FI West Non -Fibrous 331213160-0007 Homogeneous 70 -55 -189 -Mastic Blue FT -Mastic / Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 1st FI West Non -Fibrous 3312/3160.000]A Homogeneous 70 -55 -190 -Floor Tile Blue FT -Mastic / Blue 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 3rd Fl West Non -Fibrous 331213160.0008 Homogeneous 70 -55 -190 -Mastic Blue FT -Mastic / Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 3rd Fl West Non -Fibrous 331213160.0006A Homogeneous 70 -55 -191 -Floor Tile Blue FT -Mastic / Blue 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 3rd FI West Non -Fibrous 331213160.0009 Homogeneous 70 -55 -191 -Mastic Blue FT -Mastic / Black 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 3rd FI West Non -Fibrous 331213160-0009A Homogeneous Christopher Kim (42) Krysti Gonzales (3) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repot relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grope, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/14/2012 14:48:49 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/14/2012 2:48:49 PM 2 ALA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 331213160 11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRS2PRSV78 PIrsonei (714)828-49991(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslaba atestinoc com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davao Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/11/12 3:00 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/14/2012 % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous Collected: 9/7/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 Brown/Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) Project: 0588483-2 /The Wieland-Davco Corp I Office Bldg 13355 Via Lido Newport Beach CA 2nd FI South Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 18-55-192 Beige Balcony/ Brown/Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 2nd FI South Non -Fibrous 331273760-0010 Heterogeneous 18-55-193 Beige Balcony/ Brown/Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 2nd FI North Non -Fibrous 331273760-0011 Heterogeneous 22-55-194 Plaster W all / 2nd White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected FI / Suite 215 Non -Fibrous 331273760-0072 Homogeneous 22 -55 -195 -Plaster Plaster Wall / 2nd White 100% Nan -fibrous (other) None Detected FI / Suite 290 Non -Fibrous 331213160-0013 Homogeneous 22 -55 -195 -Drywall Plaster Wall / 2nd BrownlWhite 8% Cellulose 92% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected FI / Suite 290 Fibrous 331213160-0013A Heterogeneous 23-55-196 SOA Plaster Gray 92% Non-fibrous (other) 8% Chrysotile Ceiling / 2nd FI Fibrous 331213160-0014 Suite 215 Homogeneous 42 -55 -197 -Floor Tile 9" Brwn FT -Mastic Brown 92% Non-fibrous (other) 8% Chrysotile / Suite 215 Under Non -Fibrous 331213160-0015 Carpet Homogeneous 42 -55 -197 -Mastic 9" Blow FT -Mastic Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected / Suite 215 Under Non -Fibrous 331213160-0015A Carpet Homogeneous Christopher Kim (42) Krysti Gonzales (3) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repot relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grope, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/14/2012 14:48:49 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/14/2012 2:48:49 PM 3 ALA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 331213160 11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRS2PRSV78 PIrsonei (714)828-49991(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslaba atestinoc com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/11/12 3:00 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/14/2012 Description Collected: 9/7/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 66-55-198 Plaster Ceiling / Project: 0588483-2 /The Wieland -Dal Corp I Office Bldg 13355 Via Lido Newport Beach CA None Detected Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Methods) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 66-55-198 Plaster Ceiling / BrownlWhite 8% Cellulose 92% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite 300 Fibrous 331273760-0018 Heterogeneous 66-55-199 Plaster Ceiling / White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Suite 300 Non -Fibrous 331273760-0017 Homogeneous 60-55-200 Black Mastic / 3rd Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected FI Storage Rm SE Non -Fibrous 331273760-0079 Homogeneous 37-55-201 Glue / 3rd FI Brown 100% Nan -fibrous (other) None Detected Storage Ceiling Non -Fibrous 331213160-0019 Homogeneous 41 -55 -202 -Drywall DW -JC / 2nd FI E White 5% Cellulose 95% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Stairwell Fibrous 331213160-0020 Homogeneous 41 -55 -202 -Joint DW -JC / 2nd FI E White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Compound Stairwell Non -Fibrous 331213160-0020A Homogeneous 29-55-203 2x4 Pin Hole Tan 75% Cellulose 15% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Ceiling / 1st FI Fibrous 10% Glass 331213160-0021 Restaurant Kitchen Homogeneous 71 -55 -204 -Flooring Green SF -Mastic / Green 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 1st FI Restaurant Non -Fibrous 331213160.0022 Office Homogeneous Christopher Kim (42) Krysti Gonzales (3) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repot relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grope, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/14/2012 14:48:49 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/14/2012 2:48:49 PM 4 ALA Testing Cu rlD: Testing Order: 331213160 11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custome32PRS2PRSV78 PIrsonei (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslaba atestinoc com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davoo Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/11/12 3:00 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/14/2012 % Type Collected: 9/7/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Project: 0588483-2 /The Wieland-Davco Corp I Office Bldg / 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Non -Fibrous Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 71 -55 -204 -Mastic Green SF -Mastic / Black 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 1st FI Restaurant Non -Fibrous 331213160-0022A Office Homogeneous 7-55-205 Plaster Ceiling / Beige 25% Cellulose 72% Non-fibrous (other) 3% Chrysotile 1st FI Restaurant / Fibrous 331213160-0023 Dining Area Homogeneous 14 -55 -38 -Finish Plaster Wall/ list White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat FI Restaurant/ Non -Fibrous Rear Storage 331213160-0024 Homogeneous 14 -55 -38 -Base Coat Plaster Wall/ 1st Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected FI Restaurant/ Non -Fibrous 331213160.0024A Rear Storage Homogeneous 14 -55 -39 -Finish Plaster Wall / 1st Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat FI Restaurant/ Non -Fibrous 331213160-0025 Rear Hallway Homogeneous 14 -55 -39 -Base Coat Plaster Wall/ 1st Grayish 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected FI Restaurant/ Non -Fibrous 331213160-0025A Rear Hallway Homogeneous 72 -55 -206 -Floor Tile 12" Black FT -M / Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 1st FI Restaurant/ Non -Fibrous 331213160.0026 Dining Area Homogeneous 72 -55 -206 -Mastic 12" Black FT -M / White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 1st FI Restaurant/ Non -Fibrous 331213160-0026A Dining Area Homogeneous Christopher Kim (42) Krysti Gonzales (3) CT�C� Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repot relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grope, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/14/2012 14:48:49 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/14/2012 2:48:49 PM 5 ALA Testing Cu merlD: Testing Order: 331213160 11852 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Custo32PRS2PRSV78 PIrsonsi (714)828-49991(714)828-4944 Customei TESTING losalamitoslaba atestinoc com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davao Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax Coat 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/11/12 3:00 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 9/14/2012 Collected: 9/7/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 Homogeneous Project: 0588483-2 /The Wieland-Davco Corp I Office Bldg 13355 Via Lido Newport Beach CA 13 -55 -208 -Plaster Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 72-55-207 12" Black FT -M / Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected 1st FI Restaurant/ Non -Fibrous 331213160-0027 Dining Area Homogeneous No Mastic Present 13 -55 -208 -Skim DW-JC/1st Fl White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat Restaurant/ Non -Fibrous Locker Rm 331213160-0028 Homogeneous 13 -55 -208 -Plaster DW -JC / 1st FI Brown 5% Cellulose 95% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Restaurant/ Non -Fibrous 33121316a0028A Locker Rm Homogeneous 13 -55 -209 -Plaster DW -JC / 1st FI Brown 6% Cellulose 94% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Restaurant/ Non -Fibrous 3312 /3160.00 29 Kitchen Homogeneous 13 -55 -210 -Joint Di / 1st Fl White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Compound Restaurant/ Non -Fibrous Kitchen 331213160-0030 Homogeneous 13 -55 -210 -Drywall Di / 1st FI Brovm ite 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Restaurant/ Fibrous 331213160-0030A Kitchen Heterogeneous Christopher Kim (42) Krysti Gonzales (3) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repot relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears rw responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interyretabon and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by Ne client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good contlition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Gra e, CA NVLAP Lab Code t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 09/14/2012 14:48:49 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 9/14/20122:48: 49 PM THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT. 6 LA Testing Cu mrl D: Testing Order: 3S38 11652 Knoll Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92641 CUstoe32PR2PRSV78 Phone/Fax: (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 CustomerPO: TESTING losalamitoslabnolatestina.min Project)D: The Wieland-Davc Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/28/12 5:25 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 10/1/2012 Collected: 9/28/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 Project: 0588483-2 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Office Bldg 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 73 -55 -211 -Floor 12" Red Brick Red 100% Non-fibrous (other) <1% Chrysotile Tile Patrn FT -Mastic / Non -Fibrous 331214138-0001 1st Floor Mail Homogeneous 73 -55 -211 -Mastic 12" Red Brick Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Patrn FT -Mastic / Non -Fibrous 331214138-000IA fat Floor Mail Homogeneous 74-55-212 Mudded Joint / White 92% Non-fibrous (other) 5% Amosite fat Foor Mach Fibrous 3% Crocidolite 331214138-0002 Room 3" Line Homogeneous 75-55-213 Mudded Joint / White 91% Non-fibrous (other) 3% Chrysotile fat Foor Mach Fibrous 6% Amosite 331214138-0003 Room T' HW Line Homogeneous Analyst(s) Christopher Kim (4) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility far sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Code 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Report Amended: 10/01/2012 15:22:14 Replaces they Inital Report 10/01/2012 14:35:43. Reason Code: Client -Test Added Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 10/1/20123:22:14 PM THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT. ALA Testing 11852 KnottStreet Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Phone/Fax: (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 TESTING losalamitoslaba atestinoc com LA Testing Order: 331214479 CustomerlD: 32PRSV78 C;ustomei ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 10/05/1210:45 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 10/8/2012 Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Project: 0588483-2 / Office Building Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 55-214 Spray -On Acoustic- White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Ste 310 & 305 -Ste Non -Fibrous 331214479-0001 305 Homogeneous Jeffrey Deboo (1) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis, This repot relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use oflesl results are the responsibility ofthe client. This report must not be used by Ne client to claim product ceNfication,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received In good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested bythe client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by LA Tesdng Garden Grope, CA NVLAP Lab Cade t 01384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 10/08/2012 09:02:02 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 10/8/20129:02:02 AM THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT. Nom; Infbmiatiolt �I "J ,ToBuiId 0n ftin"[fng - consulung • resung #331212892 Page 1 of 3�0 W N PSI Field Sample & Material Log N Asbestos Chain Of Custody Project Name (client): The Wieland-Davco Corp Project #: 0588483-2 Building/Branch/Store #: Office Bldg. Inspector: Greg Archunq Sample Date: 8-31-12 Address: 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, Ca Relinquished By: 54 r -f +�r.�-� ^l �% - S / Z (Print) (Sig a ure) (Date) ^\�, n Relinquished To: 1 1i 1/l //� 16L V �11`�I� Z ZQW (Print) (Signature T T (Date) I Group # Sample Number Material Material Location Sample Location F/NF Cond. Qty. So 55-137 0,11-4171,-74 -rl,. ��r �0�t 3^4F SU/ & 300 / )Vr {� r r 3 co �Pa�^� I Sull a- 30o /3Z I S • J e 2-5 E, G✓ l / v Sur*e 3Y5 P. �✓� ll 14// Su z ., 41Z k/ a n/, E twA /I / `f3 , S S/,, :3741S,1,1-11 Iy -5 t/fe- 3`10 S. k/n// / y6 Su 330 W /l /`f7 Su/k 39v a l/ l 8 3/"e E, W,/) / l Y 17t -i P/a,- P1,4eC71- Sil t e 305 Su , e� Sr1 JAIFPP3o0 5- 1',cl'L7/ o sut4e 3 v S-14ee 3 o 517 1s2- 4- J- +5 to 3 brace e- SF ,c juri2 3/ 5"144- o F Send Analysis Results to the Attention of Greg Archunq r< Analyze To First Positive Analyze All Samples Requested Turnaround Time: Same Day _ 24 -Hour 48 -Hour 72 -Hour 305 Days Page 2 of 3 WXA #331212892 Project Name (client): The Wieland-Davco Corp Project # 0588483-2 Building/Branch/Store #: Office Bldg. Address: 33bb via Lldo Newoort tSeacn. va Relinquished By: �% �ti jvas. (Pi nt) Relinquished To: �y I d �i— Pnnt) 5- S /z - (Date) (Date) Group # Sample Number Material Material Location Sample Location F/NF Cond. Qty. 5y 55-15y 3 00slz 155 �-/� 56 Isa p �/3z/o� p 4- 56 156 c-eA j 6S{I,�C/yL' S e 30e S eN� 3d� F :b6j.� 5 7 159 wA,re r MP > I /L � Sir E� 30D 5,414e, 8 I �� QroNM r 3�� SGZ 3aa i�-u h'E 5 161 I31� ���+,� <�_ wow F/o�-- j , 4.0. 7C � NF r — 60 16Z. 5. )4 35D, 37Z, 3%o Sure 35-v /0F r Yo0o 63 Zo 3 /p 3/ 3 7o 5,,14a- 37 Z /✓,, 6 Surf � 3 v E� Sui><� 26 167 4 u de 31c) 6/ 6 sP, ay - o� ACr Chi 5-,40 -310 30 5S:r /-(_ e- 3/D 16�/T Sr/ - -/v 5"t' -Ii ¢- j 6s Page 3 of 3 #331212892 Project Name (client): The Wieland-Davco Corp Project# 0588483-2 Building/Branch/Store #: Office Bldg. Address: 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach. Ca Relinquished By: 6~ 2 _ % ' S- -2�- (Prin ' (Sig ture) (Date) Relinquished To: 6 la/V (Print) (Signature) (Date) Group # Sample Number Material Material Location Sample Location F/NF Cond. Qty. 0/ 517/ SP�y-d- /�ccavr�.,c �— S� , 4 F F 62 1-7 �2"wtit �/IIPSYIG ANA, S �a Nom ,�.1/o SP�a IV,4t, PF F- 30o 3r 71 4 6-1 p`i q,, ` G�� S+�T/ fie 305 � � 5:,J� 3oS NFF -76o sr 6 ►7s y l M� k;�`��er`�� ��� �, a ,-- Cl,se; lvF loosF 6 �c 176 2'��{, ca,, 365 5 300 F L-0 SF ill cN&v)) ,� 39!S- ,1— 1— Ce,,4 Ce,, 4 5:4,46 300 30C) NF F 6Sd.f 67 17 "4e, W,lls 5H,d -3ao 3�s -7/ Su,+�- 3 S Nr- F 3oo�s 16 c) 3/ o 81 3oS z 6u' X ; lltfon710017 r"It To Build Oti Enghwifng • cm wlft - r�eny #331213 160 Page 1 of 2 N PSI Field Sample & Material Log Asbestos Chain Of Custody Project Name (client): The Wieland-Davco Corp Project #: 0588483-2 Building/Branch/Store #: Office Bldg. Inspector: Greg Archung Sample Date: 9-7-12 Relinquished By: 6—X50•- h (Prin Relinquished To: C)n (Print) 1 Group # Sample Number Material Material Location Sample Location F/NF Cond. Qty. 9 C ca�Gr//3/i 5� 4c -2-/`v 68 _ /By Ff io-r�sf� Eafe �e� L✓_// "�F/. , �✓es(11G/✓�,/l/ 3v�osr i5 -,S4' y✓</J _ m WeS'l w it G 6 f' . o -le �/- L/ 5 , _, .aL� lie /�`/. , �,.. W N� l o o d— %A - �a FTS �ffc ,.�1� l✓e S� !?r<�1� ''� /i✓e NF F 1, 200 F n/ /000 Sr 2Z - l y %��1a�ci /✓<6/ �'� �—�,� s� .5�,,f�Z1S �v� F '. 4- , c Z O ` 23 _ /(76 Soq 2 5- ,4� Z LT S-. , -E_- Z -/.r NF / 7 5"X-x�YA F7 -1 -,Y -s--64 ..fie z/ -s 4t f,- 17 B 4- 1 Ff IL✓ d- d 4- t Send Analysis Results to the Attention of Greg Archung X Analyze To First Positive Analyze All Samples Requested Turnaround Time: Same Day _ 24 -Hour 48 -Hour 72 -Hour _ 3-5 Days r Page 2 of 2 . Project Name (client): The Wieland-Davco Corp Project # 0588483-2 Building/Branch/Store#: Office Bldg. Address: Relinquished By: U c�z ` �t n 14 c c t —t / 7 _ /l Z/7LA / J �� /-Z— (Print) Z(Print) gr ature) 12 (Date) Relinquished To: (Print) (Signature) (Date) Group # Sample Number Material Material Location Sample Location FINF Cond. Qty. 6U SS-Zao F 37 -201 C/t Crs�o , �J 3"��/ Sfo � Com , /, � � i /, �i /t/,r l y/ zoz F. 574,,�w e-// Z' �c/ E r{1,...— '�9— %/ SF//J,sf, JTZ/. 2�s f .� is d o ar O{ � Nf- P qJ srG" 7 -� P�S�, c�,/,� ,STFi Mon gA,e�� . e�w- d- d 4, - :707 tr �- l3 - 208 Li�F hi olnwfion iwm oBuildOn Englneedig • Co,w lff g . Testing ( 3 3 1 2 1 4 1 3 PSI Field Sample & Material Log Page of 1 Asbestos Chain Of Custody Project Name (client): The Wieland-Davco Corp Project #: 0588483-2 Building/Branch/Store #: Office Bldq. Inspector: Greg Archunq Sample Date: 9-28-12 Address: Relinquished By: X—CILW- ) (Print) Relinquished To:/��(/VK I L1G CJS5 -z r -/Z (Date) a/2 11--� 6.-2 V (Date) Group Sample Material Material Location Sample Location F/NF Cond. Qty. # Number 73 55-211 12" Red Brick Pattern 1st Floor Mail Room 151 Floor Mail NF F 70 SF FT/Mastic 74 55-212 Mudded Joint 151 Floor Mechanical Rm. 15 Floor Mechanical Rm. 3" F F 4 visible Line 75 55-213 Mudded Joint 1st Floor Mechanical Rm. 15 Floor Mechanical Rm. 1" 3 visible HW Line Send Analysis Results to the Attention of Greg Archunq i( Analyze To First Positive Analyze All Samples Requested Turnaround Time: Same Day x-- 24 -Hour 48 -Hour 72 -Hour _ 3-5 Days Nom/ 111f01111[Ii1011 e0ftring - conaumre - reeng Page 1 of 1 #33121447.0 PSI Field Sample & Material Log Asbestos Chain Of Custody Project Name (client): The Wieland-Davco Corp Project #: 0588483-2 Building/Branch/Store #: Office Bldg. Inspector: Gre vArchun Sample Date: 10-5-12 Address: 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach. CA 'ri Relinquished By: n"PGCD /O S 112, (Prin igna[ur (D te) Relinquished To: 10I S I la ID`Lk5►b,- (Prin ( gnature)\_ (Date) Send Analysis Results to the Attention of Greg Archung Analyze To First Positive ApalyZe All Samples Requested Turnaround Time: Same Day 44-Hour—48-H'our 72 -Hour _ 3-5 Days Group Sample, Material Material Location Sample Location F/NF Cond. Qty. # Number 61 55-214 Spray -On Acoustic Suite 310 and 305 Suite 310 F F 1,5000 SF Send Analysis Results to the Attention of Greg Archung Analyze To First Positive ApalyZe All Samples Requested Turnaround Time: Same Day 44-Hour—48-H'our 72 -Hour _ 3-5 Days LABORATORY RESULTS AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENTATION LEAD BASED PAINT Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-2 �LA Testing Lustorn rI Order: CustomerlD: 11652 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 Phone/Fax: (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 CustomerPO: TESTING losalamitoslam0latestina.com ProjectlD: 331212221 32PRSV78 The Wieland-Davco Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/22/121:10 PM Suite B Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Project: 0588483.1 /The Wieland-Davco Corp. / Office Building Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B*/7000B) Lab LD: Analyzed RDL Lead Concentration Notes 0001 8/23/2012 0.010 % Wt <0.010 % wt Site: Wall / Ground - Throughout / Ext. - White Client Samule Pb -55-01 Collected. 0002 8/23/2012 0.010 %wt <0.010 % wt Site: Wall / Ground - Throughout / Ext. - Mauve Client Sample Pb -55-02 Collected. Michael Chapman, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory Reporting limit is 0.010 %wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. The OC data associated with these results included in this report meet the method OC requirements, unless specifically indicated otherwise. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection aclimbes. Samples received in good condifion unless otherwise noted, 'slight modifications to methods applied. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at orabowe the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is aoai[able upon request. Samples ana[yzad by LA Testing Garden Grown, CA AIHA-LAP, LLC ELLAP 101650, CA EI -AP 1406 Initial report from 08/23/2012 10:21:52 Test Report PB w/RDL-7.26.0 Printed: 8/23/2012 10:21:52 AM Page 1 of 1 LA Testing Testing Order: 334 Cu 11652 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CustomerlD: 32PRSV2PRSV78 Phone/Fax: (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 CustomerPO: TESTING losalamiloslabOlatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davc Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/24/12 4:10 PM Suite B Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Project: 0588483-11 Office Bldg. 13355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B*/7000B) La6ID: Analyzed RDL Lead Concentration Notes 0001 8/28/2012 0.010 % wt <0.010 % wt Site: Guard Rail/Balcony-2nd FI Balcony/Metal-Pk/BI Client Sample Pb -55-03 Collected: 0002 8/28/2012 0.010 % wt 0.011 % wt Site: Window Sill/Ext.-3rd FI/Wood-Wht Client Sample Pb -55-04 Collected: 0003 8/28/2012 0.010 %wt <0.010 %wt Site: Wall/Ext Patio -3rd FI/Wood-WhUGray Client Sample Pb -55-05 Collected: Michael Chapman, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory Reporting limit is 0.010 %wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. The OC data associated with these results included in this report meet the method OC requirements, unless specifically Indicated otherwise. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples received In good condition unless otherwise noted. 'slight maturations to methods applied. "c" (less than) result signifies that the analyto was not dir ected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is available upon request Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA AIHA-IAP, LLC--ELLAP Accredited #101650, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/28/2012 10:06:17 Test Recort PB w/RDL-7.26.0 Printed: 8/28/2012 10:06:17 AM Page 1 of 1 �LA Testing Lustorn rI Order: 32PRS 61 11652 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CuStOmeflD: 32PRSV78 Phone/Fax: (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 CustomerPO: TESTING asalamitoslad0latestina.com ProjectlD: Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 09/11/123:00 PM Suite B Collected: 9/7/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 Project: 0588483-1 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Office Bldg / 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B*/7000B) Lab LD: Analyzed RDL Lead Concentration Notes 0001 9/12/2012 0.010 %wt <0.010 %wt Site: 2nd Floor Wall / Suite 215C South Wall Client Samule Pb -55-06 Collected: 9/7/2012 0002 9/12/2012 0.010 %wt 0.11 %wt Site: East Stairwell 3rd Floor Client Sample Pb -55-07 Collected: 9/7/2012 0003 9/12/2012 0.010 % wt <0.010 % wt Site: W est Stairwell 1st Floor Client Sample Pb -55-08 Collected. 9/72012 0004 9/12/2012 0.010 %wt 0.063 % wt Site: Exterior door 3rd Floor Exterior SE Client Samule Pb -55-09 Collected. 9/72012 Michael Chapman, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory Reporting limit is 0.010 %wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. The OC data associated with these results included in this report meet the method OC requirements, unless specifically indicated otherwise. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection acliwfties. Samples received in good condifion unless otherwise noted, 'slight modifications to methods applied. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at orabove the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is arse [able upon request. Samples ana[yred by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA AIHA-LAP, LLC—al-AP Accredited #101650, CA EL -AP 1406 Initial report from 09/12/2012 10:37:30 Test Report PB w/RDL-7.26.0 Printed: 9/12/2012 10:37:30 AM Page 1 of 1 W RAF; Infvinuitiolt #3 3 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 PSI Field Sample & Material Log ti N`7IN TOBUild017 Pae 1 of 1 Pb Paint Chain Of Custody Enginwdng • Consulting • Testing g Project Name (client): The Wieland-Davco Corp. Project #: 0588483-1 Building/Branch/Store #: Office Bldcl. Inspector: Greg Archung Sample Date: 8-21-12 Relinquished By: 6T- Relinquished To: V1 (Print) Analyze by Method Method EPA 7420 (narrow band spectrometry — Pb only) Address: 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach Ca (?-az iv igrr lure)_ ('ate) (Signatur ate) []Method EPA 6010 (wide band spectrometry —all metals) Group # Sample Number Material Location Sample Location Color Cond. Qty. 1 Pb -55-01 Wall / Ground Throughout / Exterior White P Unknown 2 Pb -55-02 Wall/ Ground Throughout Exterior Mauve P Unknown 'If multiple layers list colors from top to bottom (e.g. red/green/blue) Send Analysis Results to the Attention of Greg Archunq Requested Turnaround Time: Same Day _ 24 -Hour 48 -Hour _72 -Hour _ 3-5 Days MC■ �)i bi 1iafioii N�� ,TnBuilcl0)t. EnginmAny • Cc=ffing - resting #331212434 Page 1 of 1 PSI Field Sample & Material Log Pb Paint Chain Of Custody Project Name (client): The Wieland-Davco Corp. Project #: 0588483-1 Building/Branch/Store #: Office Bldg. Inspector: Greg Archung Sample Date: 8-24-12 Address: 3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, Ca Relinquished By _ (Print) (Signature) (Date) Relinquished To: 4 -2�j L _ /LA 6,3) a -2 /L (Print) (Signatu - (Date) �^ Analyze by Method ® Method EPA 7420 (narrow band spectrometry — Pb only) ❑ Method EPA 6010 (wide band spectrometry — all metals) Group # Sample Number Material Location Sample Location Color Cond. Qty. 3 Pb -55-03 Guard Rail / Balcony 2nd FI. Balcony/ Metal Pink/Blue P 100 LF 4 Pb -55-04 Window Sill/ Exterior 3`d Floor/ Wood White P 40 LF 5 Pb -55-05 Wall / Exterior Patio 3`d Floor / Wood White/Gray P 200 SF 'If multiple layers list colors from top to bottom (e.g. red/green/blue) Send Analysis Results to the Attention ofGregGreg Archunq Requested Turnaround Time: Same Day _ 24 -Hour 48 -Hour 72 -Hour _ Days Ng® 117folvlalion ��..ToBuild Oil Enghwertng a Canwktrg • reatlrg #33121316 Page 1 of 1 W Y" N PSI Field Sample & Material Log Pb Paint Chain Of Custody Project Name (client): The Wieland-Davco Corp. Project #: 0588483-1 Building/Branch/Store #: Office Bldg. Inspector: Greg Archunq Sample Date: 9-7-12 Relinquished By: h Relinquished To: Analyze by Method (Print) EPA 7420 (narrow band spectrometry — Pb only) Address: Aur (Date) Ili I la 3..MOV-7 alure) �r (Dale) Method EPA 6010 (wide band spectrometry — all metals) Group # Sample Number Material Location Sample Location Color Cond. Qty. 6 Pb -55-06 2nd Floor Wall Suite 215C South Wall White P 1000 SF 7 Pb -55-07 East Stairwell East Stairwell 3`d Floor Gray P 100 SF 8 Pb -55-08 West Stairwell West Stairwell 1s' Floor White P 100 SF 9 Pb -55-09 Exterior Door 3rd Floor Exterior SE White/ Brown P 100 SF 'If multiple layers list colors from top to bottom (e.g. red/green/blue) Send Analysis Results to the Attention of Greg Archunq Requested Turnaround Time: Same Day _ 24 -Hour 48 -Hour 24- 72 -Hour — 3-5 Days CODES AND REGULATIONS -ASBESTOS AND LEAD Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-2 CODES AND REGULATIONS - ASBESTOS Federal regulations which govern asbestos abatement work or hauling and disposal of asbestos waste materials include but are not limited to the following: U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Asbestos Regulations Title 29, Part 1910, Section 1001 of the Code of Federal Regulations Final Rule Title 29, Part 1926, Section 1101 of the Code of Federal Regulations Respiratory Protection Title 29, Part 1910, Section 134 of the Code of Federal Regulations Construction Los Angeles Title 29, Part 1926, of the Code of Federal Regulations Access to Employee Exposure & Medical Records Title 29, Part 1910, Section 20 of the Code of Federal Regulations Hazard Communication Title 29, Part 1910, Section 1200 of the Code of Federal Regulations Specifications for Accident Prevention Signs and Tags Title 29, Part 1910, Section 145 of the Code of Federal Regulations Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) including but not limited to: Worker Protection Rule 40 CFR Part 763, Subpart G CPTS 62044, FLR 2843-9 Federal Register, Vol. 50, No. 134, 7/12/85 P28530-28540 Regulation for Asbestos Title 40, Part 61, Subpart A of the Code of Federal Regulations National Emission Standard for Asbestos Title 40, Part 61, Subpart M of the Code of Federal Regulations including NESHAP Revision; Final Rule, Federal Register; Tuesday, November 20, 1990. Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) Regulations 40 CFR 763 Subpart E Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-2 CODES AND REGULATIONS — ASBESTOS, continued U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) including but not limited to: Hazardous Substances: Final Rule Regulation 49 CFR, Parts 171 and 172 Uniform Fire Code: Asbestos Removal UFC Section 87.106, 87.102 Standards which govern asbestos abatement work or hauling and disposal of asbestos waste materials include but are not limited to the following: American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Fundamentals Governing the Design and Operation of Local Exhaust Systems Publication Z9.2-79 Practices for Respiratory Protection Publication Z88.2-80 Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-2 CODES AND REGULATIONS - LEAD-BASED PAINT Federal and state regulations which govern tead-based paint work or hauling and disposal of lead- based paint waste materials include but are not limited to the following: FEDERAL Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Interim Guidelines OSHA Lead In Construction 29 CFR 1926.62 NESHAP Emissions Standards 40 CFR 50.12 Lead -Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (LBPPPA), 1970. Title 10 - Residential LBP Hazard Reduction Act, 1992, (amendment for LBPPPA,1970) Resource Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA) Title 17, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Division 1, Chapter 8: Accreditation, Certification and Work Practices for Lead -Based Paint and Lead Hazards Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-2 ASBESTOS AND LIMITED LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY Proposed Christian Science First Church 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA 92663 Prepared for: The Wieland Davco Corporation 4162 English Oak Drive Lansing, Michigan 48911 PSI Project # 0588483-1 Prepared by: Professional Service Industries, Inc. 6330 Gateway Drive, Suite B Cypress, CA 90630 September 27, 2012 Gregory R. Archung, CAC, CDPH I/A Department Manager Robert W. White, REA, CAC Principal Consultant This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of The Wieland Davco Corporation and affiliates thereof. Results are based solely on the methodology stated in this report and the report should be relied upon in its entirety. Any reliance a third party makes of this report is the responsibility of such third party. TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................1 RESULTS SUMMARY................................................................................................2 METHODS.................................................................................................................. 4 NOTICES, PERMITS, AND LICENSES......................................................................5 DRAWINGS................................................................................................................ 6 APPENDICES............................................................................................................. 7 Inspector Certifications Laboratory Results and Chain of Custody Documentation Codes and Regulations Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-1 SECTION 1 Executive Summary GENERAL INFORMATION Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) was retained by The Wieland-Davco Corp. to perform a survey for asbestos, including limited sampling for lead-based paint, at the Christian Science First Church located at 3303 Via Lido, Newport Beach, California. The survey included both interior and exterior materials at the church in preparation for demolition. AUTHORIZATION Written authorization to perform this survey was provided by the Wieland-Davco Corporation in the form of the execution of PSI proposal number 0588-72237 dated August 7, 2012. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The scope of work included the identification of suspect asbestos -containing materials (ACM) and major interior building components painted with lead-based paint. PSI's scope of work was limited to asbestos and lead, and therefore did not address fluorescent tubes, potential PCB, mold, and mercury -containing materials. The inspection was conducted on August 16, 21, and 24, 2012, by PSI Department Manager Gregory R. Archung, CAC #92-0041 and CDPH Lead Inspector/Assessor #390. Asbestos -Containing Materials A total of seventy-seven (81) samples of suspect ACM representing twenty-eight (28) types of homogeneous materials were collected from the building. Materials sampled included floor tiles and associated mastic, sheet flooring and associated glue, acoustic ceiling tiles and associated mastic, wall plaster, drywall system, roof core, and roof flashing and associated mastic. Laboratory results indicated detectable levels of asbestos in roof flashing, roof mastic, joint compound, air cell debris, 9" floor tile and associated mastic, mudded joint/ceiling, white sheet flooring and associated mastic, beige 12" floor tile and associated mastic, brown mastic, and acoustic ceiling. A summary of laboratory result information is listed in Section 2 of this report. Lead -Based Paint A total of three (3) samples were collected from the building for lead analysis during the survey. Two of the three paint chip samples collected had detectable levels of lead. A summary of laboratory result information is listed in Section 2 of this report. Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-1 SECTION 2 Results Summary ACM SURVEY RESULTS A material is considered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to be asbestos -containing if at least one sample collected from an area shows asbestos present in an amount greater than one percent (1%). In the State of California, the Department of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) considers a material to be asbestos -containing construction material (ACCM) if at least one sample collected from the area shows asbestos present in an amount greater than one-tenth of one percent (>0.1%). Specific removal and licensing requirements apply if ACM or ACCM will be disturbed during maintenance, renovation, or demolition activities. The following homogeneous building material types were sampled as part of this survey. Results are summarized in the tables below. MTL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LOCATION EPA COND 3 No. OF %ACM QUANTITY # CAT SAMPLES 01 Roof Core 5 Layers Utility Roofs NA G 3 ND 1,500 SF 02 Roof Flashing Utility Roofs NA G 3 ND 1,200 SF Roof: Vents, Duct Seams, Roof 03 Gray/Black Roof Mastic Drains, Parapet Vents, Elec. CAT I G 3 Mastic= 2% CH 400 SF Pipe 04 Brown/Black 3layers Roof under Spanish Tiles NA F 3 ND 12,500 SF 05 Plaster Walls Throughout NA G 7 ND 14,000 SF 06 Gray Blown Insulation Ceiling Crawls ace NA F 3 ND 14,000 SF 07 Tan Paper Above Ceiling Ceiling Cmwlspace NA F 3 ND 14,000 SF Tiles 08 Gray Air Cell Debris Under Rolled FG Insulation RACM P 2 Debris= 30% CH Unknown Ceiling Crawlspace 09 Black Vapor Barrier Throughout NA G 3 ND 20,000 SF 70 9" White Floor Loft Room CAT I F 2 Tile= 3% CH 100 SF TileBlack Mastic Mastic= 5% CH 11 1'x l'Ceiling Tile Throughout NA F 3 ND 14,000 SF 12 Brown Base Cove Glue Throughout RACM G 3 <1% CH 3,800 LF 13 Beige Mudded Joint Ceiling Crawl Space RACM G 1 15% CH 7 Visible White Mosaic Sheet Floor Tile= 2% CH 14 Flooring/Mastic/Beige Floral Room CAT I F 2 Mastic= 2% CH 100 SF FT/Black Mastic Sheet Flooring= ND 15 12" Beige FT/ Black Under Carpet Teller Room, SW AT I F 2 Tile= 3% CH 200 SF Mastic Bathroom Mastic= 7% CH 16 Beige SF/Mastic Child Care Bathroom CAT I F 2 SF= ND Mastic= 5% CH 25 SF 17 Float(Black Mastic Sunday School, Auditorium NA F 1 FL -ND 500 SF M -ND 18 Brown Mastic Auditorium CAT I G 1 6% CH 50 SF 19 White Acoustic Ceiling Reading Room (R.R.), RACM G 3 2% CH 2,000 SF Plaster Committee, Sales Rooms 20 Wall Plaster R.R. Building NA G 5 ND 4,000 SF 21 Gray Blown in Insulation R.R. Bldg. Ceiling Space NA F 3 ND 2,000 SF 22 Black Roof Debris R.R. Bldg. Ceiling Space CAT I P 3 <1% CH Unknown 23 Black Roof Core Reading Room: Roof NA NA 3 ND 1,500 SF 24 Roof Flashing Core Reading Room: Roof CAT I G 3 Shingle= ND 200 SF Felt= 10% CH 25 Gray/Black Roof Mastic RR Roof: Vents, Duct Seams, CAT I G 3 6-7% CH 75 SF Parapet Vents, etc. 26 Exterior Plaster R.R.: Throu hout RACM F 3 <1% CH 1,800 SF 27 Exterior Plaster Church:Throu hout NF G 5 ND 8,000 SF 28 Drywall/ Joint Former Organ Motor Room RACM F 3 JC= 2% CH 250 SF Compound DW= ND 'F=Friable; NF=Non-friable Friability is further defined in section 4 2Cond. = Condition of Materials (Good, Fair, Poor) SF = Square feet LF = Linear feet NA = Not applicable ND = No asbestos detected CH = Chrysotile DW = Drywall JC = Joint Compound Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI ProjecHt0588483-1 When samples analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy contain asbestos in amounts less than ten percent (<10%), a more exact method of analysis called point counting may be performed at the client's request. The EPA point count method allows a sample in which asbestos was visually detected, but which is visually estimated to have 10% or less asbestos, to be more accurately quantified. EPA required point counting for sample results of <1% asbestos. If not point counted, a sample in which asbestos was visually detected and estimated (including trace to 51%) must be assumed to be greater than 1 % and treated as ACM. PSI recommends point counting of the base cove glue ( material group 12), black roofing debris (material group 22), and exterior plaster (material group 26). LEAD -CONTAINING MATERIALS RESULTS Lead was not detected in the paint chip samples collected. Federal efforts to regulate Lead Based Paint (LBP) began with the enactment of the Lead -Based Paint Poison Prevention Act (LBPPPA) in 1971. In 1973, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) defined lead-based paint as paint having lead content equal to or greater than 0.5 percent by weight in a dry film of newly applied paint. In 1978, the CPSC lowered the allowable lead levels in new paint to 0.06%. The Housing and Urban Development Agency (HUD) developed guidelines relating to HUD facilities. The HUD guidelines specified lead content of 0.5% as an action level in determining the need for corrective action. Federal and State Occupational Health and Safety Administration (Fed -OSHA 29 CFR 1920.1025 and DOSH under Title 8 CCR 1532.1) do not define the amount of lead in paint to a regulatory requirement; rather the activities or task define when the regulation is in effect. Both Federal and State standards use the term "trigger task" activities. In the work place, employers must make certain assumptions of the exposure levels and comply with the regulations based on the level of disturbance rather than the lead level. The following materials were sampled for lead content as part of this survey. Results are summarized in the tables below: Painted Representative Surfaces SAMPLE NO. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LOCATION CONDITIONS RESULT LEAD BY WEIGHT QUANTITY Ph-CS-Ot White Wali/ Plaster Throu hout/Auditorium G 0.017 % 30,000 SF Pb -CS -02 White Wall/ Plaster Throu hout/ Exterior P < 0.010 100 SF Pb -CS -03 White Window/Wood Exterior P 0.067% 50 SF `This result is below the Limit of Detection Title 17, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Division 1, Chapter 8: Accreditation, Certification and Work Practices for Lead -Based Paint and Lead Hazards, defines lead-based paint as paint or other surfacing coating that contains an amount of lead equal to, or in excess of, one milligram per square centimeter (1.0 mg/cm2) or more than 0.5% by weight. The industry has interpreted this to mean that any detectable amount of lead is regulated. For example, employees who perform trigger tasks (such as manual demolition) are required to receive employer provided training, air monitoring, protective clothing, respirators, and hand washing facilities. In addition there are standard work practices required such as the use of wet methods and HEPA vacuums. Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI ProjecHt0588483-1 SECTION 3 Warranty PSI warrants that the findings contained herein have been prepared in general accordance with the standard of care exercised within the asbestos and lead-based paint testing and abatement industries. PSI recognizes that raw laboratory test data are not usually sufficient to make all abatement and management decisions. The survey included inspection of reasonably accessible materials such as above or behind suspended ceilings, walls, or other non -permanent structures. PSI did not, however, inspect or sample inaccessible areas. The information contained in this report is based upon the data furnished by The Wieland-Davco Corp., and observations and test results provided by PSI. These observations and results are time dependent and are subject to changing site conditions and revisions to Federal, State, and local regulations. No other warranties are implied or expressed. Use by Third Parties This report was prepared pursuant to the contract PSI has with The Wieland-Davco Corp. That contractual relationship included an exchange of information about the subject sites that was unique and between PSI and The Wieland-Davco Corp. and serves as the basis upon which this report was prepared. Because of the importance of the communication between PSI and The Wieland-Davco Corp., reliance or any use of this report by anyone other than The Wieland-Davco Corp. for whom it was prepared is prohibited and therefore not foreseeable to PSI. Reliance or use by any such third party without explicit authorization in the report does not make said third party a third party beneficiary to PSI's contract with The Wieland-Davco Corp.. Any such unauthorized reliance on or use of this report, including any of its information or conclusions, will be at third party's risk. For the same reasons, no warranties or representations, expressed or implied in this report, are made to any such third party. Unidentifiable Conditions This report is necessarily limited to the conditions observed and to the information available at the time of the work. Due to the nature of the work, there is a possibility that conditions may exist which could not be identified within the scope of work or which were not apparent at the time of our site work. This report is also limited to information available from Ross Stores, Inc. at the time it was prepared. The report may not represent all conditions at the subject sites as it only reflects the information gathered from specific locations. Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-1 SECTION 4 Methods ASBESTOS Inspection and sampling procedures were performed in accordance with the guidelines published by the EPA in 40 CFR Part 763 Subpart E, October 30, 1987. Sampling procedures include collection of at least three samples of all suspect friable and non -friable materials as recommended by EPA Guidance Document 700/13-92/001, February 1992. An EPA accredited inspector performed the inspection and survey as described below. The survey consisted of three major activities: visual inspection, sampling, and quantification of building materials. Although these activities are listed separately, they are integrated tasks. VISUAL INSPECTION An initial building walkthrough was conducted to determine the presence and condition of suspect materials that were accessible and/or exposed. Materials which were similar in general appearance were grouped into homogeneous sampling areas. ■ Homogeneous Material Classifications A preliminary walkthrough of the building was conducted to determine areas of materials which were visually similar in color, texture, general appearance, and which appeared to have been installed at the same time. Such materials are termed "homogeneous materials" by the EPA. During this walkthrough, the approximate locations of these homogeneous materials were also noted. Following the EPA inspection protocol, each identified suspect homogeneous material was placed in one of the following EPA classifications: Surfacing Materials (spray or trowel applied to building members). 2. Thermal System Insulation (materials generally applied to various mechanical systems). 3. Miscellaneous Materials (any materials which do not fit either of the above categories). ■ Friability Classifications A regulated asbestos -containing material (RACM) as defined by National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), is any (a) Friable asbestos material, (b) Category I non - friable ACM that has become friable, (c) Category I non -friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading, or (d) Category II non -friable ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations. Following the EPA inspection protocol, each identified suspect homogeneous material was placed in one of the following EPA classifications: Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-1 1. Friable Materials NESHAP defines a friable ACM as any material containing more than one percent asbestos that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. 2. Category I Non -friable NESHAP defines a Category I non -friable ACM as packing, gaskets, resilient floor covering (except sheet flooring products which are considered friable), and asphalt roofing products which contain more than one percent asbestos. 3. Category II Non -friable NESHAP defines a Category II non -friable ACM as any material, except for a Category I non -friable ACM, which contains more than one percent asbestos and cannot be reduced to a powder by hand pressure when dry. SAMPLING PROCEDURES Following the walkthrough, the inspector collected selected samples of accessible materials identified as suspect ACM. EPA guidelines were used to determine the sampling protocol. Sampling locations were chosen to be representative of the homogeneous material. Samples of surfacing material were collected in general accordance with the EPA sampling protocol outlined in the EPA publication, "Asbestos in Buildings: Simplified Sampling Scheme for Friable Surfacing Materials" (EPA 560/5-85-030a, October, 1985). Representative samples were taken preferentially from already damaged areas or areas which were the least visible. Samples of miscellaneous materials were taken as randomly as possible, while again attempting to sample already damaged areas so as to minimize disturbance of the material. Multiple sampling was used to assess each miscellaneous material unless the total quantity of accessible material was less than 260 square feet. QUANTIFICATION Quantities of accessible and/or exposed building materials that were suspected of containing asbestos were estimated. Taking approximate measurements in the field performed this estimation. LABORATORY PROCEDURES Method of Analysis Analysis was performed at LA Testing's Laboratory in Garden Grove, California, a National Volunteer Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) accredited laboratory. A chain -of -custody, documenting the possession of the samples from the time they were collected until analyzed and stored, was submitted with the bulk samples. The original chain -of -custody accompanied the materials at all times. Custody documentation began at the time samples were collected and each transferor retained a copy of the chain -of -custody record. Analysis was performed by using the bulk sample for visual observation and slide preparation(s) for microscopic examination and identification. The samples were mounted on slides and then analyzed for asbestos (chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, anthophyllite, and actinolite/tremolite), fibrous non -asbestos constituents (mineral wool, paper, etc.) and non-fibrous constituents. Refractive indices, morphology, color, pleochroism, birefringence, extinction characteristics, and signs of elongation identified asbestos. The same characteristics were used to identify the non - asbestos constituents. Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-1 The microscopist visually estimated relative amounts of each constituent by determining the volume of each constituent in proportion to the total volume of the sample, using a stereoscope. All bulk samples were analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining as described by the method of the determination of asbestos in bulk insulation, EPA/600/R-93/116, July 1993. This is a standard method of analysis in optical mineralogy and the currently accepted method for the determination of asbestos in bulk samples. A suspect material is immersed in a solution of known refractive index and subjected to illumination by polarized light. The characteristic color displays which result enable mineral identification. It should be noted that some ACM might not be accurately identified and/or quantified by PLM. As an example, the original fabrication of vinyl floor tiles routinely involved milling of asbestos fibers to extremely small sizes. As a result, these fibers may go undetected under the standard PLM method. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) is recommended for a more definitive analysis of these materials. For bulk samples which are found to contain <1% asbestos, Point Count Analysis as described by the method for the determination of asbestos in accordance with Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) "Interim Method for Identification of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples" (40 CFR 763, Appendix A, Subpart F), is often utilized. As part of this method, a bulk sample is reduced, in an effort to dissolve any non -asbestos constituents, such as calcite. As a result of this reduction process, a concentrated sample is then obtained and analyzed. In California a minimum number of counts for each sample is 1000. The number of identified asbestos points is divided by 1000, then multiplied by 100 in order to calculate the percentage. Each asbestos type is quantified individually. LEAD-BASED PAINT This survey was prepared in anticipation of possible renovation of the building. Survey activities included the sampling of exterior lead-based paint on major building components with sample locations provided in the drawings set forth in Section 6 of this report. Major exterior building components were selected and paint -chip and bulk sampling was performed. SAMPLING PROCEDURES Following the walk-through, the inspector performed paint -chip and bulk sampling of the selected building component. The paint chip sample was an approximately 2" x 2" chip that represents all potential paint layers. LABORATORY PROCEDURES Method of Analysis Analysis was performed at LA Testing's Laboratory in Garden Grove, California, an Environmental Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELLAP) accredited laboratory, using the method for determination of lead in paint -chip samples. The lead analysis was performed using a Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (FLAA) (Method 7420). The FLAA burner head was first lit by opening the flow regulator on the acetylene tank, and was allowed to thermally stabilize before any analysis procedures could begin. The samples were filtered and examined after placing in an auto - sampler tube. The FLAA was calibrated using a known lead standard. After the FLAA calibration procedure was completed, the lead -chip samples were analyzed by the FLAA. Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-1 Laboratory Quality Control Program LA Testing's Laboratory is AIHA accredited and participates in the AIHA, ELLAP, and ELPAT performance rounds as part of the accreditation requirements. Quality control procedures at the laboratory monitor the proficiency of the technicians and the reliability of the results, and include the insertion of various samples into the sample stream for quality assurance. The laboratory demonstrates proficiency with each analytical method used, including documentation of precision and accuracy, and maintenance of detection limit information. Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-1 SECTION 5 Notices, Permits, and Licenses If the ACM identified in this report will be disturbed through future maintenance, renovation, or demolition activities, they will be subject to the requirements set forth in all applicable local, state, and federal regulations. The following notices, permits, and licenses are necessary for abatement work as of the date of this report. The abatement contractor is cautioned to verify these requirements as applicable to the final project scope and confirm that no new requirements exist. LOCAL AIR QUALITY BOARD Written notification is required to the South Coast Air Quality Management District at least 14 days prior to beginning any work on friable or non -friable ACM of 100 square feet or greater. This requirement is also enforced by the EPA. The following notices, permits and licenses are necessary for abatement work as of the date of this report. The abatement contractor is cautioned to verify these requirements as applicable to the final project scope and confirm that no new requirements exist. LICENSES The Abatement Contractor must maintain current licenses as required by applicable state or local jurisdictions for the removal, transporting, disposal, or other regulated activity. Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-1 SECTION 6 Drawings Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-1 I frY� CXYIN�.a sb Cr orj" ,C ;'vi'vlCl bo"j, (-D 7-k T w o s -1 6;� s Gas SA.,+OFF orlY Q%Ja1'erSl,.,,-f prF ®D 1 lU vn Tt.+l.rr G:locl� I� ®4.,c bibs ch;)�- Ca.v.. Yefe I ;7Y P6 O MO�a r�lnp le-/ i�a.ier S��f OFF fLts'�'n-w powder i 7 J ,./ 17 -GH Fi-2-.Gfi yl - n—Z7d' � d ]Za5'�'rt»n Queer 12cR 27 I 2� � l 3n7.cL� D via, L; L• %6 All b' 73 d`fiY Oqt .rli%lee Sjlo of ?Z ty � Sd.�eS morn �n Cle riffs Rw.w ty � Sd.�eS morn �n F,�-L Ext-,"j"Ik' O�/¢c'fr�c Panel ��Jrds Tl}crMn5fvf5 Osp'J InQl2� `ory Trol SA 'r PI, bray Clean OST Ti.n v G' I OGl ,s µor. e Jrbs ❑m G✓afe� ski orF (�pI.CL 7 Sunday r.A / FL. 3 ldrL�iny 1°� I13� o7hb I owt n.r%/ee t Rtbdu Qr� Florsl I U.P.;;-y,` p I r+ SS � / Rnm B poy`r -YY Pls t. O off:- ry e�gg� i ll FIDra.l 4E� G a 'FPd'l.ry j y II ,,/ Z%nGli ® Roo.>. Ld.tlive � D✓'l's�dm 'Pla..�'.r 71�2,o1-C� ( (� . �a5{Mn biz nl t+'1 l Sae 1.+� y� Q. !� O �w f � J ^ ✓ � w ) ✓ s+ �1—t RU O 1 6_ A//e4— . Pm, �-j ✓aa! w"ArJ o�%+tvG✓ile /7o7464. Sal('-r>rn 0� "ICS SECTION 7 Appendices Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-1 INSPECTOR CERTIFICATIONS Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-1 State of California Division of Occupational Safety and Health Certified Asbestos Consultant Gregory R Archung Name Certification No. 92-0041 Expires on 06/17/13 Thal O"Ibitai was Issued by the Mason of Owipahwal Selely end Health as authorized by Seollom 7100 of seq of the Business and Pmlosslons Code State of California Department of Public Health Lead-Related -ertdocate E�ueu,n Construction Tspr Dat. Certificate InspA♦lectDesig Designer 1110712012 PrDject Designer 1110712012 Project Monitor 11/07/2012 Gregory R. Archung m lot, 3W LABORATORY RESULTS AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENTATION ASBESTOS Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-1 ALA Testing Cu Testing Order: 32PRS 46 11652 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CustomerlD: 32PRSV78 Phvmmi (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 Customei TESTING Iosalamitoslabaalatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davoo Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/21/128:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/27/2012 Description Collected: 8/16/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 %Type 1 -CS -01 -Shingle Project: 0588483-1 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Christian Science First Church / 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous %Type 1 -CS -01 -Shingle Roof Core/ Utility White/Black 12% Glass 88% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Roofs / Southeast Fibrous 331212146-0001 Heterogeneous 1 -CS -01 -Roofing 1 Roof Core/ Utility Black 10% Glass 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Roofs / Southeast Fibrous 331212146-000fA Heterogeneous 1 -CS -01 -Roofing 2 Roof Core / Utility Black 10% Glass 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Roofs / Southeast Fibrous 331212146-00018 Heterogeneous 1 -CS -01 -Roofing 3 Roof Core/ Utility Black 10% Glass 88% Nan -fibrous (other) None Detected Roofs / Southeast Fibrous 2% Cellulose 331212148-0001C Heterogeneous 1 -CS -01 -Felt Roof Cue/ Utility Gray/Black 85% Cellulose 15% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Roofs / Southeast Fibrous 331212148-0001D Heterogeneous 1 -CS -02 -Shingle Roof Core/ Utility White/Black 12% Glass 88% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Roofs / Middle Fibrous 331212146-0002 Heterogeneous 1 -CS -02 -Roofing 1 Roof Cue/ Utility Black 10% Glass 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Roofs / Middle Fibrous 3312/2148-0002A Heterogeneous 1 -CS -02 -Roofing 2 Roof Cue / Utility Black 10% Glass 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Roofs / Middle Non -Fibrous 331212148-00028 Homogeneous Christopher Kim (33) Krystyn Gonzales (29) Jeffrey Deboo (36) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMBL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears m responsibility, for sample collection activAms or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of fest results are the responsibility, of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal gowemment. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends graHmetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples receivetl in goad condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. lindeum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is i % Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA Ni Lab Cade 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/27/2012 15:51:49 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/27/2012 3:51:49 PM 1 ALA Testing Cu Testing Order: 32PRS 46 11652 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CustomerlD: 32PRSV78 Phvmmi (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 Customei TESTING Iosalamitoslabaalatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davoo Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/21/128:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/27/2012 Sample Collected: 8/16/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 Fibrous % Non -Fibrous %Type Project: 0588483-1 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Christian Science First Church / 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous %Type 1 -CS -02 -Roofing 3 Roof Core/ Utility Black 8% Glass 92% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Roofs / Middle Fibrous 331212146-0002C Heterogeneous 1 -CS -02 -Felt Roof Core/ Utility Gray/Black 90% Cellulose 10% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Roofs / Middle Fibrous 331212146-0002D Homogeneous 1 -CS -03 -Shingle Roof Core/ Utility W hite/Black 10% Glass 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Roofs / Southwest Fibrous 331212146-0003 Heterogeneous 1 -CS -03 -Roofing 1 Roof Core/ Utility Black 8% Glass 92% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Roofs / Southwest Fibrous 331212148-0003A Homogeneous 1 -CS -03 -Roofing 2 Roof Cue / Utility Black 6% Glass 94% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Roofs / Southwest Fibrous 331212148-00038 Homogeneous 1 -CS -03 -Roofing 3 Roof Cue/ Utility Black 8% Glass 92% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Roofs / Southwest Fibrous 331212146-0003C Homogeneous 1 -CS -03 -Felt Roof Cue/ Utility Gray/Black 80% Cellulose 20% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Roofs / Southwest Fibrous 331212148-0003D Homogeneous 2 -CS -04 -Shingle Roof Flashing / W hite/Black 12% Glass 88% Nan -fibrous (other) None Detected Utility Roofs / North Fibrous 331212148-0004 Heterogeneous Christopher Kim (33) Krystyn Gonzales (29) Jeffrey Deboo (36) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMBL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears m responsibility, for sample collection activAms or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of fest results are the responsibility, of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal gowemment. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends graHmetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples receivetl in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. lindeum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is i % Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA Ni Lab Cade 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/27/2012 15:51:49 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/27/2012 3:51:49 PM 2 ALA Testing Cu Testing Order: 32PRS 46 11652 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CustomerlD: 32PRSV78 Phvmmi (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 Customei TESTING Iosalamitoslabaalatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davoo Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/21/128:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/27/2012 Description Collected: 8/16/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 %Type 2 -CS -04 -Roofing Project: 0588483-1 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Christian Science First Church / 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous %Type 2 -CS -04 -Roofing Roof Flashing / Black 8% Glass 92% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Utility Roofs / North Fibrous 331212146-0004A Heterogeneous 2 -CS -04 -Felt Roof Flashing / Gray/Black 85% Cellulose 15% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Utility Roofs / North Fibrous 331212146-00048 Homogeneous 2 -CS -05 -Shingle 1 Roof Flashing / W hite/Black 12% Glass 88% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Utility Roofs / East Fibrous 331212146-0005 Heterogeneous 2 -CS -05 -Shingle 2 Roof Flashing / White/Black/Grayis 10% Glass 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Utility Roofs / East In Fibrous 3312121461 Heterogeneous 2 -CS -05 -Roofing Roof Flashing / Black 10% Glass 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Utility Roofs / East Fibrous 3312121-06-09058 Heterogeneous 2 -CS -06 -Shingle Roof Flashing / White/Black 10% Glass 90% Nan -fibrous (other) None Detected Roofs / South Fibrous 331212146-006Utility Heterogeneous 2 -CS -06 -Felt Roof Flashing / Black 25% Cellulose 75% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Utility Roofs / South Fibrous 331212146-0006A Homogeneous 3 -CS -07 Roof Mastic / Black 15% Cellulose 85% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected North Vent Pipe Non -Fibrous 331212146-0007 Homogeneous Christopher Kim (33) Krystyn Gonzales (29) Jeffrey Deboo (36) .ArrCdt'—� Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMBL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears m responsibility, for sample collection activAms or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of fest results are the responsibility, of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal gowemment. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends graHmetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples receivetl in goad condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. lindeum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is i % Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Cade 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/27/2012 15:51:49 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/27/2012 3:51:49 PM 3 ALA Testing Cu Testing Order: 32PRS 46 11652 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CustomerlD: 32PRSV78 Phvmmi (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 Customei TESTING Iosalamitoslabaalatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davoo Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/21/128:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/27/2012 Description Collected: 8/16/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 %Type 3 -CS -08 Project: 0588483-1 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Christian Science First Church / 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous %Type 3 -CS -08 Roof Mastic / Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected South Duct Non -Fibrous 331212146-0008 Homogeneous 3 -CS -09 Roof Mastic / Black/Silver 15% Cellulose 83% Non-fibrous (other) 2% Chrysotile Northeast Fibrous 331212146-0009 Electrical Box Heterogeneous 4 -CS -10 -Shingle 1 Roof Felt / Roof Brown/Red/Black 10% Glass 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected under Spanish Fibrous 331212146-0010 Tiles / Southeast Heterogeneous 4 -CS -10 -Shingle 2 Roof Felt / Roof Brown/Black 10% Glass 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected under Spanish Fibrous 331212146-0010A Tiles / Southeast Heterogeneous 4 -CS -10 -Felt Roof Felt / Roof Black 70% Cellulose 30% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected under Spanish Fibrous 331212146-0010B Tiles / Southeast Homogeneous 4 -CS -11 -Shingle 1 Roof Felt / Roof Brown/Red/Black 12% Glass 88% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected under Spanish Fibrous 331212146-0011 Tiles / South Heterogeneous 4 -CS -11 -Shingle 2 Roof Felt ( Roof Brown/Black 10% Glass 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected under Spanish Fibrous 331212146-0o11A Tiles / South Heterogeneous 4 -CS -11 -Felt Roof Felt / Roof Black 75% Cellulose 25% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected under Spanish Fibrous 331212146-00118 Tiles / South Homogeneous Christopher Kim (33) Krystyn Gonzales (29) Jeffrey Deboo (36) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMBL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears m responsibility, for sample collection activAms or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of fest results are the responsibility, of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal gowemment. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends graHmetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples receivetl in goad condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. lindeum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is i % Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA Ni Lab Cade 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/27/2012 15:51:49 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/27/2012 3:51:49 PM 4 ALA Testing Cu Testing Order: 32PRS 46 11652 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CustomerlD: 32PRSV78 Ph.rmi (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 Customei TESTING Iosalamitoslabaalatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davoo Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/21/128:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/27/2012 Appearance Collected: 8/16/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 Roof Felt / Roof Brown Project: 0588483-1 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Christian Science First Church / 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous %Type 4 -CS -12 -Shingle Roof Felt / Roof Brown 15% Glass 85% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected under Spanish Fibrous 331212146-0012 Tiles / Southwest Heterogeneous 4 -CS -12 -Felt Roof Felt / Roof Brown 50% Cellulose 50% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected under Spanish Fibrous 331212146-0012A Tiles / Southwest Homogeneous 5 -CS -13 -Finish Coat Plaster Walls / White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout/ Floral Non -Fibrous 331212146-0013 Homogeneous 5 -CS -13 -Base Coat Plaster Walls / Grayish 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout/ Floral Non -Fibrous 331212146-0013A Homogeneous 5 -CS -14 -Finish Coat Plaster Walls / White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout / SS Non -Fibrous 331212146-0014 Super Homogeneous 5 -CS -14 -Base Coat Plaster W alls / Grayish 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout / SS Non -Fibrous 331212146-o014A Super Homogeneous 5 -CS -15 -Finish Coat Plaster W alls / White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout/ Non -Fibrous 331212146-0015 Sunday School Homogeneous (SS) 5 -CS -15 -Base Coat Plaster Walls / Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout/ Non -Fibrous 331212146.0015A Sunday School Homogeneous (SS) Christopher Kim (33) Krystyn Gonzales (29) Jeffrey Deboo (36) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMBL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears m responsibility, for sample collection activAms or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of fest results are the responsibility, of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal gowemment. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends graHmetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples receivetl in goad condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. lindeum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is i % Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA Ni Lab Cade 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/27/2012 15:51:49 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/27/2012 3:51:49 PM 5 ALA Testing Cu Testing Order: 32PRS 46 11652 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CustomerlD: 32PRSV78 Phvmmi (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 Customei TESTING Iosalamitoslabaalatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davoo Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/21/128:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/27/2012 % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous Collected: 8/16/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 W hite/Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) Project: 0588483-1 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Christian Science First Church / 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous %Type 5 -CS -16 Plaster Walls / W hite/Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout/NE Non -Fibrous 331212146-0016 Auditorium Heterogeneous Unable to separate finish coat and base coal layers for analysis. 5 -CS -17 -Finish Coat Plaster W alts / White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout/ SW Non -Fibrous 331212146-0017 Auditorium Homogeneous 5 -CS -17 -Base Coat Plaster Walls / Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout/ SW Non -Fibrous 331212146-0017A Auditorium Homogeneous 5 -CS -18 -Finish Coat Plaster Walls / White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout/ S Non -Fibrous 331212146-0018 Loft Area Homogeneous 5 -CS -18 -Base Coat Plaster Walls / Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout/ S Non -Fibrous 331212146 18A Loft Area Homogeneous 5 -CS -19 -Finish Coat Plaster Walls / White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout/ N Non -Fibrous 3312121460019 Loft Area Homogeneous 5 -CS -19 -Base Coat Plaster Walls / Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout/ N Non -Fibrous 331212146-0019A Loft Area Homogeneous 6 -CS -20 Blown Insulation Gray 90% Min. Wool 10% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Mineral Wool/ Fibrous 331212146-0020 Crawlspace / South Homogeneous Christopher Kim (33) Krystyn Gonzales (29) Jeffrey Deboo (36) %ali Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMBL maintains liability limited to ccs/ of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears rc responsibility, for sample collection activAes or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of fest results are the responsibility, of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal gcvamment. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends graHmetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples receivatl in goad condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. lindeum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is i % Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA Ni Lab Cade 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/27/2012 15:51:49 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/27/2012 3:51:49 PM 6 ALA Testing Cu Testing Order: 32PRS 46 11652 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CustomerlD: 32PRSV78 Ph.rmi (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 Customei TESTING Iosalamitoslabaalatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davoo Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/21/128:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/27/2012 Sample Collected: 8/16/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 Fibrous % Non -Fibrous %Type Project: 0588483-1 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Christian Science First Church / 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous %Type 6 -CS -21 Blown Insulation Gray 90% Min. Wool 10% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Mineral Wool/ Fibrous 331212146-0021 Crawlspace / Middl Homogeneous 6 -CS -22 Blown Insulation Gray 90% Min. Wool 10% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Mineral Wool/ Fibrous 331212146-0022 Crawlspace/SW Homogeneous 7 -CS -23 Paper Abv Ceiling / Tan 95% Cellulose 5% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Crawlspace / Aud Fibrous 331212146-0023 Southeast Homogeneous 7 -CS -24 Paper Abv Ceiling / Tan 95% Cellulose 5% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Crawlspace / Aud Fibrous 331212146-0024 Southwest Heterogeneous 7 -CS -25 Paper Abv Ceiling / Tan 90% Cellulose 10% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Crawlspace / Aud Fibrous 331212146-0025 Northwest Homogeneous 8 -CS -26 Air Cell Debris/ Grayish 50% Cellulose 20% Non-fibrous (other) 30% Chrysotile Crawlspace / Aud Fibrous 331212146-0026 Southeast Homogeneous 8 -CS -27 Air Cell Debris / Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) / Aud 331212146-0927 Southwest Southwest 9 -CS -28 Vapor Barrier/ Black 25% Cellulose 75% Non-fibrous(other) None Detected Throughout/ Fibrous 331212146-0028 Ceiling Space Homogeneous Christopher Kim (33) Krystyn Gonzales (29) Jeffrey Deboo (36) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMBL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears m responsibility, for sample collection activAms or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of fest results are the responsibility, of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal gowemment. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends graHmetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples receivetl in goad condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. lindeum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is i % Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA Ni Lab Cade 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/27/2012 15:51:49 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/27/2012 3:51:49 PM 7 ALA Testing Cu Testing Order: 32PRS 46 11652 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CustOmerlD: 32PRSV78 Phvmmi (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 Customei TESTING Iosalamitoslabaalatestinaxom ProjeetlD: The Wieland-Davoo Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/21/128:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/27/2012 Description Collected: 8/16/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 %Type 9 -CS -29 Project: 0588483-1 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Christian Science First Church / 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous %Type 9 -CS -29 Vapor Barrier I Black 25% Cellulose 75% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout / Hall Fibrous 331212146-0029 Homogeneous 9 -CS -30 Vapor Barrier / Black 25% Cellulose 75% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout/ Closet Fibrous 331212146-0030 Homogeneous 10 -CS -31 -Floor Tile 9" W ht FT -Mastic! White 97% Non-fibrous (other) 3% Chrysotile Loft Room / North Non -Fibrous 331212146-0031 Homogeneous 10 -CS -31 -Mastic 9"Wht FT -Mastic/ Black 95% Non-fibrous (other) 5% Chrysotile Loft Room / North Non -Fibrous 331212146-0031A Homogeneous 10 -CS -32 9" W ht FT -Mastic / Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Loft Room / West 331212146-0032 11 -CS -33 1x1 Ceiling Tile/ Grayish 15% Cellulose 35% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout / Aud Fibrous 50% Glass 331212146-00 3 3 Southwest Homogeneous 11 -CS -34 1x1 Ceiling Tile/ Grayish 10% Cellulose 40% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout! Fibrous 50% Min. Wool 331212146-0034 Hallway Homogeneous 11 -CS -35 1x1 Ceiling Tile/ Gray 20% Cellulose 30% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout! Fibrous 50% Min. Wool 331212146-0035 Custodian Closet Homogeneous Christopher Kim (33) Krystyn Gonzales (29) Jeffrey Deboo (36) %ArrCdt'—� Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMBL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears m responsibility, for sample collection activAms or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of fest results are the responsibility, of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal gowemment. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends graHmetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples receivetl in goad condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. lindeum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is i % Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA Ni Lab Cade 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/27/2012 15:51:49 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/27/2012 3:51:49 PM 8 ALA Testing Cu Testing Order: 32PRS 46 11652 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CustomerlD: 32PRSV78 Phvmmi (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 Customei TESTING Iosalamitoslabaalatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davoo Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/21/128:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/27/2012 Description Collected: 8/16/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 12 -CS -36 -Mastic Brown Base Cove Project: 0588483-1 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Christian Science First Church / 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 12 -CS -36 -Mastic Brown Base Cove Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) <1% Chrysotile Glue / Throughout Non -Fibrous 331212146-0036 /Sunday School Homogeneous 12 -CS -36 -Plaster Brown Beige Cove White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Glue / Throughout Non -Fibrous 331212146-0036A /Sunday School Homogeneous 12 -CS -37 -Mastic Brown Beige Cove Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) <1% Chrysotile Glue / Throughout Non -Fibrous 331212146-0037 /Sunday School Homogeneous 12 -CS -37 -Plaster Brown Base Cove White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Glue / Throughout Non -Fibrous 331212146-0037A /Sunday School Homogeneous 12 -CS -38 -Mastic Brown Base Cove Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) <1% Chrysotile Glue / Throughout Non -Fibrous 331212146-0038 / Aud Homogeneous 12 -CS -38 -Plaster Brown Base Cove White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Glue / Throughout Non -Fibrous 331212146-003aA / Auld Homogeneous 13 -CS -39 Mudded Joint/ Beige 20% Min. Wool 65% Non-fibrous(other) 15% Chrysotile Ceiling Fibrous 331212146-0039 Crawlspace/NW Homogeneous Utility Roo 14 -CS -40 -Sheet W ht SF -Mastic -FT- White/Grayish 10% Cellulose 85% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Flooring Mastic / Floral Fibrous 5% Glass 33121214&0040 Room / North Heterogeneous Christopher Kim (33) Krystyn Gonzales (29) Jeffrey Deboo (36) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMBL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears m responsibility, for sample collection activAms or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of fest results are the responsibility, of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal gowemment. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends graHmetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples receivetl in goad condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. lindeum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is i % Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA Ni Lab Cade 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/27/2012 15:51:49 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/27/2012 3:51:49 PM 9 ALA Testing Cu Testing Order: 32PRS 46 11652 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CustomerlD: 32PRSV78 Ph.rmi (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 Customei TESTING Iosalamitoslabaalatestina.com ProjeetlD: The Wieland-Davoo Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/21/128:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/27/2012 W ht SF -Mastic -FT- Collected: 8/16/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 Mastic / Floral Non -Fibrous Project: 0588433-1 I The Wieland-Davco Corp I Christian Science First Church / 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous %Type 14 -CS -40 -Mastic W ht SF -Mastic -FT- Tan 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Mastic / Floral Non -Fibrous 331212146-0040A Room / North Homogeneous 14 -CS -40 -Floor Tile Wht SF -Mastic -FT- Beige 98% Non-fibrous(other) 2% Chrysotile Mastic / Floral Non -Fibrous 331212146-00408 Room / North Homogeneous 14 -CS -40 -Mastic W ht SF -Mastic -FT- Black 98% Non-fibrous (other) 2% Chrysotile Mastic / Floral Non -Fibrous 331212146-0040C Room / North Homogeneous 14 -CS -41 -Sheet W ht SF -Mastic -FT- White/Grayish 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Flooring Mastic / Floral Fibrous 331212146-041 Room / East Heterogeneous 14 -CS -41 -Mastic Wht SF -Mastic -FT- Insufficient Material Mastic / Floral 331212148-0041A Room / East 14 -CS -41 -Floor Tile Wht SF -Mastic -FT- Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Mastic / Floral 331212146-041B Room / East 14 -CS -41 -Mastic W ht SF -Mastic -FT- Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Mastic / Floral 3 312 1214 8-0 0 41C Room / East 15 -CS -42 -Floor Tile 12"FT-Blk Mastic Beige 97% Non-fibrous (other) 3% Chrysotile /SW Bathroom Non -Fibrous 331212146-0042 Homogeneous Christopher Kim (33) Krystyn Gonzales (29) Jeffrey Deboo (36) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMBL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears m responsibility, for sample collection activAms or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of fest results are the responsibility, of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal gowemment. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends graHmetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples receivetl in goad condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. lindeum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is i % Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA Ni Lab Cade 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/27/2012 15:51:49 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/27/2012 3:51:49 PM 10 ALA Testing Cu Testing Order: 32PRS 46 11652 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CustomerlD: 32PRSV78 Phvmmi (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 Customei TESTING Iosalamitoslabaalatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davoo Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/21/128:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/27/2012 Appearance Collected: 8/16/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 12" FT-Blk Mastic Black Project: 0588483-1 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Christian Science First Church / 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous %Type 15 -CS -42 -Mastic 12" FT-Blk Mastic Black 93% Non-fibrous (other) 7% Chrysotile /SW Bathroom Non -Fibrous 331212146-0042A Homogeneous 15 -CS -43 12" FT-Blk Mastic Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) / Teller Room 331212146-01743 16 -CS -44 -Sheet Beige SF -Mastic / Beige 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Flooring Child Care Fibrous Bathroom 331212146-0044 Heterogeneous 16 -CS -44 -Mastic Beige SF -Mastic / Black 95% Non-fibrous (other) 5% Chrysotile Child Care Non -Fibrous 331212146.0044A Bathroom Homogeneous 16 -CS -45 -Sheet Beige SF -Mastic / Beige 12% Cellulose 88% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Flooring Child Care Fibrous 331212146-0045 Bathroom Heterogeneous 16 -CS -45 -Mastic Beige SF -Mastic / Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Child Care 331212146-0045A Bathroom 17 -CS -46 -Float Float-Blk Mastic / Beige 25% Cellulose 75% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Sunday School Non -Fibrous 331212146-0046 SW Corner Homogeneous 17 -CS -46 -Mastic Float-Blk Mastic / Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Sunday School Non -Fibrous 331212146-0046A SW Comer Homogeneous Christopher Kim (33) Krystyn Gonzales (29) Jeffrey Deboo (36) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMBL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears m responsibility, for sample collection activAms or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of fest results are the responsibility, of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal gowemment. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends graHmetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples receivetl in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. lindeum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is i % Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA Ni Lab Cade 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/27/2012 15:51:49 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/27/2012 3:51:49 PM 11 ALA Testing Cu Testing Order: 32PRS 46 11652 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CustomerlD: 32PRSV78 Phvmmi (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 Customei TESTING Iosalamitoslabaalatestina.com ProjeetlD: The Wieland-Davoo Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/21/128:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/27/2012 18 -CS -47 Collected: 8/16/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 Auld SE Entry to Project: 0588483-1 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Christian Science First Church / 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 18 -CS -47 Brown Mastic/ Brown 94% Non-fibrous (other) 6% Chrysotile Auld SE Entry to Non -Fibrous 331212146-0047 Stage Area Homogeneous 19 -CS -48 Acoustic Ceiling White 98% Non-fibrous (other) 2% Chrysotile Plaster/ Non -Fibrous 331212146-0048 Committee Room Homogeneous 19 -CS -49 Acoustic Ceiling Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Plaster/ 331212146-0049 Committee Room 19 -CS -50 Acoustic Ceiling Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Plaster/ 331212146-0050 Committee Room 20 -CS -51 -Finish Wall Plaster/ RR White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat Bldg / Committee Non -Fibrous 331212146-0051 Rm Homogeneous 20 -CS -51 -Base Coat Wall Plaster/ RR Grayish 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Bldg / Committee Non -Fibrous 331212146-0 51A Rm Homogeneous 20 -CS -52 -Base Coat Wall Plaster/ RR Grayish 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Bldg / Floral Non -Fibrous 331212146-0052 Homogeneous Insufficient finish coat Christopher Kim (33) Krystyn Gonzales (29) Jeffrey Deboo (36) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMBL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears m responsibility, for sample collection activAms or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of fest results are the responsibility, of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal gowemment. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends graHmetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples receivatl in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. lindeum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is i % Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA Ni Lab Cade 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/27/2012 15:51:49 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/27/2012 3:51:49 PM 12 ALA Testing Cu Testing Order: 32PRS 46 11652 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CustomerlD: 32PRSV78 Ph.rmi (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 Customei TESTING Iosalamitoslabaalatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davoo Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/21/128:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/27/2012 % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous Collected: 8/16/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 White 100% Non-fibrous (other) Project: 0588483-1 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Christian Science First Church / 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous %Type 20 -CS -53 -Finish Wall Plaster/ RR White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat Bldg / Study Rm Non -Fibrous 331212146-0053 Homogeneous 20 -CS -53 -Base Coat Wall Plaster/ RR Grayish 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Bldg / Study Rm Non -Fibrous 331212146-0D53A Homogeneous 20 -CS -54 -Finish Wall Plaster/ RR White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat Bldg / Men's Non -Fibrous 331212146-0054 Homogeneous 20 -CS -54 -Base Coat Wall Plaster/ RR Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Bldg / Men's Non -Fibrous 331212146-0054A Homogeneous 20 -CS -55 -Finish Wall Plaster/ RR White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat Bldg / Women's Non -Fibrous 331212146-0055 Homogeneous 20 -CS -55 -Base Coat Wall Plaster/ RR Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Bldg / Women's Non -Fibrous 331212146.0055A Homogeneous 21 -CS -56 Blown in Insulation Grayish 90% Min. Wool 10% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected / RR Bldg Cell Fibrous 331212146.0056 Space/Hallway Homogeneous Christopher Kim (33) Krystyn Gonzales (29) Jeffrey Deboo (36) 1� Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMBL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears m responsibility, for sample collection activAms or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of fest results are the responsibility, of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal gowemment. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends graHmetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples receivetl in goad condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. lindeum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is i % Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA Ni Lab Cade 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/27/2012 15:51:49 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/27/2012 3:51:49 PM 13 ALA Testing Cu Testing Order: 32PRS 46 11652 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CustomerlD: 32PRSV78 Ph.rmi (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 Customei TESTING Iosalamitoslabaalatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davoo Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/21/128:20 AM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/27/2012 21 -CS -57 Collected: 8/16/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 / RR Bldg Coil Project: 0588483-1 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Christian Science First Church / 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach CA Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous %Type 21 -CS -57 Blown in Insulation Black/Grayish 90% Min. Wool 10% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected / RR Bldg Coil Fibrous 331212146-0057 Space/Hallway Homogeneous 21 -CS -58 Blown in Insulation Grayish 90% Min. Wool 10% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected / RR Bldg Coil Fibrous 331212146-0058 Space/Hallway Homogeneous 22 -CS -59 Roof Debris / RR Black <1% Cellulose 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Bldg Coil Space/ Non -Fibrous <1% Glass 331212146-0059 Hallway Access Heterogeneous 22 -CS -60 Roof Debris / RR Black 100% Non-fibrous (other) <1% Chrysotile Bldg Cell Space / Non -Fibrous 331212146-0060 Hallway Access Heterogeneous 22 -CS -61 Roof Debris / RR Black 2% Glass 98% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Bldg Cell Space / Non -Fibrous 331212146-0061 Hallway Access Homogeneous Christopher Kim (33) Krystyn Gonzales (29) Jeffrey Deboo (36) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMBL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears m responsibility, for sample collection activAms or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of fest results are the responsibility, of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal gowemment. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends graHmetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples receivetl in goad condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. lindeum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is i % Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA Ni Lab Cade 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/27/2012 15:51:49 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/27/20123:51:49 PM THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT. 14 ALA Testing Cu Testing Order: 32PRSV23 11652 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CustomerlD: 32PRSV78 Ph.rmi (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 Customei TESTING Iosalamitoslabaalatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davoo Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/22/121:10 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/29/2012 Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Sample Project: 0588483-1 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Christian Science First Church Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous %Type 23 -CS -62 Roof Core/RR Black 20% Glass 80% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected R Roof -S Fibrous 331212223-0001 Homogeneous 23 -CS -63 Roof Core/RR Black 20% Glass 80% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Roof -Middle Fibrous 331212223-0002 Homogeneous 23 -CS -64 Roof Core/RR Black 15% Glass 85% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected R oof-N Fibrous 331212223-0003 Homogeneous 24 -CS -65 Roof Flashing White/Black 25% Glass 75% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Care/RR RolFibrous 331212223-0009 Heterogeneous 24 -CS -66 -Shingle 1 Roof Flashing White/Black 20% Glass 80% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Care/RR Roof -W Fibrous 331212223-0005 Heterogeneous 24 -CS -66 -Felt Roof Flashing Black 90% Non-fibrous (other) 10% Chrysotile Core/RR Roof -W Fibrous 331212223-000vA Homogeneous 24 -CS -67 -Shingle Roof Flashing White/Black 15% Glass 85% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Core/RR Roofi Fibrous 331272223-0008 Heterogeneous 24 -CS -67 -Felt Roof Flashing Black 15% Glass 85% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Core/RR Roofi Fibrous 331272223-0006A Homogeneous Christopher Kim (10) Krystyn Gonzales (21) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMBL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears m responsibility, for sample collection activAms or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of fest results are the responsibility, of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certifcation,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends graHmetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in goad condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building mstores manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. lindeum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is i % Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA NVLAP Lab Code 101384-0, CA ELAP 1408 Initial report from 08/29/2012 11:21:44 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/29/2012 11:21:44 AM 1 ALA Testing Cu Testing Order: 32PRSV23 11652 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CustomerlD: 32PRSV78 Ph.rmi (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 Customei TESTING Iosalamitoslabaalatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davoo Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/22/121:10 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/29/2012 Asbestos Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Appearance Project: 0588483-1 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Christian Science First Church Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type 25 -CS -68 Roof Mastic/RR Gray/Black 94% Non-fibrous (other) 6% Chrysotile Roof Vents/Seams- Non -Fibrous 331212223-0007 NE Flashing Seam Homogeneous 25 -CS -69 Roof Mastic/RR Gray/Black 94% Non-fibrous (other) 6% Chrysotile Roof Vents/Seams- Non -Fibrous 331212223-0008 Middle HVAC Pad Homogeneous 25 -CS -70 Roof Mastic/RR Black/Silver 93% Non-fibrous (other) 7% Chrysotile Roof Vents/Seams- Fibrous 331212223-0009 SE Vent Pipe Homogeneous 26 -CS -71 -Finish Ext. Plaster/RR White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat Throughout -SE Non -Fibrous 331212223-010 Homogeneous 26 -CS -71 -Base Coat Ed. Plaster/RR Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout -SE Non -Fibrous 331212223-OOfOA Homogeneous 26 -CS -72 -Finish Ed. Plaster/RR White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat Throughout -E Non -Fibrous 331212223-0011 Homogeneous 26 -CS -72 -Base Ext. Plaster/RR Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) <1% Chrysotile Coat 1 Throughout -E Non -Fibrous 331212223.0011A Homogeneous Christopher Kim (10) Krystyn Gonzales (21) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMBL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears m responsibility, for sample collection activAms or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of fest results are the responsibility, of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certifcation,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends graHmetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in goad condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building mstores manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. lindeum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is i % Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA Ni Lab Cade 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/29/2012 11:21:44 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/29/2012 11:21:44 AM 2 ALA Testing Cu Testing Order: 32PRSV23 11652 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CustomerlD: 32PRSV78 Ph.rmi (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 Customei TESTING Iosalamitoslabaalatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davoo Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/22/121:10 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/29/2012 Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Sample Project: 0588483-1 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Christian Science First Church Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous %Type 26 -CS -72 -Base Ext. Plaster/RR Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat Throughout -E Non -Fibrous 331212223-00118 Homogeneous 26 -CS -73 -Finish Ext. Plaster/RR White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat Throughout -NE Non -Fibrous 331212223-0012 Homogeneous 26 -CS -73 -Base Coat Ext. Plaster/RR Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Throughout -NE Non -Fibrous 331212223.0012A Homogeneous 27 -CS -74 Ext. Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Plaster/Throughout Non -Fibrous 331212223-0013 -E Homogeneous 27 -CS -75 -Finish Ext. White 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat Plaster/Throughout Non -Fibrous 331212223-0014 -E Homogeneous 27 -CS -75 -Base Coat Ext. Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Plaster/Throughout Non -Fibrous 331212223.0014A -E Homogeneous 27 -CS -76 -Finish Ext. Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Coat Plaster/Throughout Non -Fibrous 331212223-0015 -N Heterogeneous Christopher Kim (10) Krystyn Gonzales (21) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMBL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears m responsibility, for sample collection activAms or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of fest results are the responsibility, of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certifcation,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends graHmetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in goad condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building mstores manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. lindeum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is i % Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA Ni Lab Cade 101384-0, CA ELAP 1408 Initial report from 08/29/2012 11:21:44 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/29/2012 11:21:44 AM 3 ALA Testing Cu Testing Order: 32PRSV23 11652 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CustomerlD: 32PRSV78 Ph.rmi (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 Customei TESTING Iosalamitoslabaalatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davoo Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/22/121:10 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/29/2012 Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 Sample Project: 0588483-1 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Christian Science First Church Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous %Type 27 -CS -76 -Base Coat Ext. Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Plaster/Throughout Non -Fibrous 331212223-OO15A -N Homogeneous 27 -CS -77 Ext. Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Plaster/Throughout Non -Fibrous 331212223-0016 -SW Homogeneous 27 -CS -78 Ext. Beige 100% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Plaster/Throughout Non -Fibrous 331212223-0017 -S Homogeneous 28 -CS -79 -Joint DW/JC-Former Beige 98% Non-fibrous (other) 2% Chrysotile Compound Organ Motor Rm.- Non -Fibrous 331212223-0016 SF Homogeneous 28 -CS -79 -Drywall DW/JC-Former Brown/White 12% Cellulose 88% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Organ Motor Rim.- Fibrous 331212223-WlBA SE Heterogeneous 28 -CS -80 -Joint DW/JC-Former Beige 98% Non-fibrous (other) 2% Chrysotile Compound Organ Motor Rm.- Non -Fibrous 331212223-0019 NW Homogeneous 28 -CS -80 -Drywall DW/JC-Former Brown/1Nhite 12% Cellulose 88% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Organ Motor Rm.- Fibrous 331212223.0019A NW Heterogeneous Christopher Kim (10) Krystyn Gonzales (21) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMBL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears m responsibility, for sample collection activAms or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of fest results are the responsibility, of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certifcation,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends graHmetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples receiwetl in goad condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building mstores manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. lindeum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is i % Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA Ni Lab Cade 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from 08/29/2012 11:21:44 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/29/2012 11:21:44 AM 4 ALA Testing Cu Testing Order: 32PRSV23 11652 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CustomerlD: 32PRSV78 Ph.rmi (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944 Customei TESTING Iosalamitoslabaalatestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davoo Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/22/121:10 PM Suite B Analysis Date: 8/29/2012 28 -CS -81 -Joint Collected: Cypress, CA 90630 2% Chrysotile Project: 0588483-1 / The Wieland-Davco Corp / Christian Science First Church Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy 28 -CS -81 -Drywall DW/JC-Former Brown/1Nhite 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Organ Motor Rm.- Fibrous 331212223.0020A NE Heterogeneous Christopher Kim (10) Krystyn Gonzales (21) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMBL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears m responsibility, for sample collection activAms or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of fest results are the responsibility, of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certifcation,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends graHmetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples receiwetl in goad condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building mstores manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. lindeum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is i % Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA Ni Lab Cade 101384-0, CA ELAP 1408 Initial report from 08/29/2012 11:21:44 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/29/201211:21:44 AM THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT. 5 Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous %Type 28 -CS -81 -Joint DW/JC-Former Beige 98% Non-fibrous (other) 2% Chrysotile Compound Organ Motor Rm.- Non -Fibrous 331212223-0020 NE Homogeneous 28 -CS -81 -Drywall DW/JC-Former Brown/1Nhite 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) None Detected Organ Motor Rm.- Fibrous 331212223.0020A NE Heterogeneous Christopher Kim (10) Krystyn Gonzales (21) Derrick Tanner, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMBL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears m responsibility, for sample collection activAms or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of fest results are the responsibility, of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certifcation,approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non -friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends graHmetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples receiwetl in goad condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building mstores manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. lindeum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is i % Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA Ni Lab Cade 101384-0, CA ELAP 1408 Initial report from 08/29/2012 11:21:44 Test Report PLM -7.16.0 Printed: 8/29/201211:21:44 AM THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT. 5 r.��; 6i01711aiofi # 3 3 1 2 1 2 100Field Sample & Material Log I`Ma ,ToBuildOn Page 1 of 5 Asbestos Chain Of Custody Project Name (client): The Wieland-Davco Corp Project #r 0588483-1 Building/Branch/Store #: Christian Science First Church Inspector: Greg Archunq Sample Date: 8-16- Relinnnisharl Rv G�^�- G '4�—, nnnt7 I Relinquished To: /` �1 V'l v" (Print) Dale) (Date) Group # Sample Number Material Material Location Sample Location F/NF Cond. Qty. 1 CS -01 Roof Core 5 layers Utility Roofs Southeast NF G 1,500 SF CS -02 Middle CS -03 Southwest 2 CS -04 Roof Flashing Utility Roofs North NF G 1,200 SF 4— CS -05 East CS -06 South 3 CS -07 Roof Mastic Roof: Vents, Duct Seams, Roof Drains, Parapet Vents, etc North Vent Pipe NF G 400 SF CS -08 South Duct CS -09 Northeast Electrical Box 4 CS -10 Roof Felt 3 Layers Roof under Spanish Tiles I Southeast NF F 12,500 SF CS -11 South CS -12 Southwest Send Analysis Results to the Attention of Greg Archunq Analyze To First Positive Analyze All Samples Requested Turnaround Time: Same Day _ 24 -Hour 48 -Hour 72 -Hour — 3&Days Page 2 of 5 . #331212 146 Project Name (client): The Wieland-Davco Corp Project # 0588483-1 Building/Branch/Store #: Christian Science First Church Address: Relinquished By: Relinquished To: (Date) 8 Z-- Sza (Date) Group # Sample Number Material Material Location Sample Location F/NF Cond. Qty. 5 CS -13 Plaster Walls Throughout Floral NF G 14,000 sf CS -14 SS Super. CS -15 Sunday School (SS) CS -16 NE Auditorium 'CS -17 SW Auditorium CS -18 S Loft Area 'r CS -19 < N Loft Arear 6 CS -20 Blown Insulation Mineral Wool Ceiling Crawlspace South F F 14,000 SF CS -21 Middle CS -22 Southwest 7 CS -23 Paper Above Ceiling Tiles Ceiling Crawlspace Aud. Southeast F F 14,000 SF CS -24 Aud. Southwest CS -25 Aud. Northwest Page 3 of 5 . #331212146 Project Name (client): The Wieland-Davco Corp Project # 0588483-1 Building/Branch/Store #: Christian Science First Church Address: 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach. Ca Relinquished By: (Print) ign ture) a (Date) Relinquished To: SJ G( Zo (Print) (Signatur (Date) Group # Sample Number Material Material Location Sample Location F/NF Cond. Qty. 8 CS -26 Air Cell Debris Under Rolled FG Insulation Ceiling Crawls ace Aud. Southeast F P Unknown CS -27 Aud. Southwest 4, 9 CS -28 Vapor Barrier Throughout Ceiling Space NF G 2 SF F 0 S CS -29 Hall CS -30 Closet 10 CS -31 g,, White Floor Tile / Black Mastic Loft Room North. NF F 70 sf CS -32 West 11 CS -33 1'x1' Ceiling Tile Throughout Aud. Southwest F F 14,000 SF CS -34 Hallway CS -35 Custodian Closet 12 CS -36 Brown Base Cove Glue Throughout Sunday School NF G 3,800 LF CS -37 Sunday School CS -38 Aud. Page 4 of 5 . #331212146 Project Name (client): The Wieland-Davco Corp Project # 0588483-1 Building/Branch/Store #: Christian Science First Church Address: 3303 Via Lido NewDort Beach. Ca Relinquished By: A , et, � 1 nnt) T (Si nature) (Date) Relinquished To:I�IQ�Y`L (Print) (Signature) (Date) Group Sample Material Material Location Sample Location F/NF Cond. Qty. # Number 13 CS -39 Mudded Joint Ceiling Crawl Space NE Utility Roof Acess NF G 7 Visible White Mosaic Sheet 14 CS -40 Flooring/ Mastic / Beige Floral Room North NF F 80 SF FT / Black Mastic CS -41 East 15 CS -42 12" Beige FT / Black Under Carpet Teller Room, SW Bathroom NF F 200 SF Mastic SW Bathroom CS -43 Teller Room 16 CS -44 Beige SF/Mastic Child Care Bathroom Child Care Bathroom NF F 25 SF CS -45 Child Care Bathroom 17 CS -46 Float / Black Mastic Sunday School, Auditorium Sunday School Southwest NF F 500 SF Corner 18 CS -47 Brown Mastic Auditorium Aud. Southeast Entry to Stage 50 SF Area 19 CS -48 Acoustic Ceiling Plaster Reading Room (RR) Bldg. Committee Room NF G 2,600 SF CS -49 Committee Rm., Study Rm., Committee Room Sales Rm. CS -50 Committee Room 20 CS -51 Wall Plaster RR Bldg. Committee Rm. NF G 4,000 SF Page 5 of 5 . #33121214 E? Project Name (client): The Wieland-Davco Corp Project # 0588483-1 Building/Branch/Store M Christian Science First Church Address: 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach, Ca Relinquished By: �' A'�L, — 1 I 6- y I / Z (Pri t) ign ture) (Date) Relinquished To: �y -, a� LZ (Print) (Signature) I(Date) Group # Sample Number Material Material Location Sample Location F/NF Cond. Qty. CS -52 Floral CS -53 Study Rm. CS -54 Men's CS -55 Women's 21 CS -56 Blown in Insulation RR Bldg. Ceiling Space Hallway Access Area F F 3,000 SF CS -57 Hallway Access Area CS -58 Hallway Access Area 22 CS -59 Roof Debris RR Bldg. Ceiling Space Hallway Access Area NF P 3,000 SF CS -60 Hallway Access Area CS -61 Hallway Access Area Nne j 111f0lniati011 � ,TOBuildOil Eagirwrbg • Calmldng - reating #331212223 Page 1 of 2 PSI Field Sample & Material Log Asbestos Chain Of Custody Project Name (client): The Wieland-Davco Corp Project #: 0588483-1 Building/Branch/Store#: Christian Science First Church 2-1 Inspector: Greg Archunq Sampllee Date: 8-0-12 6 Address: 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach, Ca Relinquished By: yr /� A-c.Lv.� �j —ZZ- 17i rint nat re) (Da ) Relinquished To: �U [ L� lJ (Print) V (Signature) (D e) Group # Sample Number Material Material Location Sample Location F/NF Cond. Qty. 23 CS -62 Roof Core RR: Roof South NF G 1,300 SF CS -63 Middle CS -64 North 24 CS -65 Roof Flashing Core RR: Roof South NF G 200 SF CS -66 West CS -67 Northeast 25 CS -68 Roof Mastic RR Roof: Vents, Duct Seams, Parapet Vents, etc NE Flashing Seam NF G 75 SF CS -69 Middle HVAC Pad CS -70 Southeast Vent Pipe 26 CS -71 Exterior Plaster RR: Throughout Southeast NF F 1,800 SF CS -72 East 4— CS-73 Northeast Send Analysis Results to the Attention of Greg Archunq --DN,mot Analyze To First Positive Analyze All Samples `J Requested Turnaround Time: Same Day _ 24 -Hour 48 -Hour 72 -Hour 3-5 Days Page 2 of 2. # 3 3 12 1 2 2 2 3 Project Name (client): The Wieland-Davco Corp Project # 0588483-1 Building/Branch/store M Christian Science First Church Address: Relinquisl Relinquisl F - ZZ- / v (Date) Z_ / (Date) Group # Sample Number Material Material Location Sample Location F/NF Cond. Qty. 27 CS -74 Exterior Plaster Throughout East NF G 8,000 sf CS -75 East CS -76 North CS -77 Southwest CS -78 South 28 CS -79 Drywall/Joint Compound Former Organ Motor Rm. Southeast NF F 250 sf CS -80 Northwest CS -81 Northeast LABORATORY RESULTS AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENTATION LEAD BASED PAINT Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-1 tjALA Testing Cu Testing Order: 32PRS 52 11652 Knott Street Unit F5, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CustOmerlD: 32PRSV78 Phone/Fax: (714)82849991(714)828-4944 CustomerPO: TESTING Iosalamitoslab5latestina.com ProjectlD: The Wieland-Davco Attn: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/21/128:20 AM Suite B Collected: 8/16/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 Project: 0588483-1 /The Wieland-Davco Corp / Christian Science First Church Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B*/7000B) Lab ID.' Analyzed RDL Lead Concentradon Notes 0001 8/27/2012 0.010%wt 0.017 %wt Site: Wall/Plaster - Throughout- Auditorium Client Samnle Pb-CS-01 Collected. 8/16/2012 Michael Chapman, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory Reporting limit is 0.010 %wt based on the minimum sample weight perour SOP. The OC data associated with these results included in this report meet the method OC requirements, unless specifically indicated otherwise. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank consisted EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. 'slight modifications to methods applied. "d' (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainly is available upon request. Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA AMA -LAP, LLC—EL-AP Accredited #101650, CA EL -AP 1406 Initial report from 08/27/2012 17:12:39 Test Report PB w/RDL-7.26.0 Printed: 8/27/2012 5:12:39 PM Page 1 of 1 �LA Testing Testing Order: Cu 11652 Knott Street Unit F6, Garden Grove, CA 92841 CustomerlD: Phone/Fax: (714)828-4999/(714)828-4944 CustomerPD: TESTING losalamitoslabraDlatestina.com ProjectlD: Ann: Greg Archung Phone: (714)484-8600 PSI - Professional Services, Inc. Fax: 6330 Gateway Drive Received: 08/22/121:10 PM Suite B Collected: 8/22/2012 Cypress, CA 90630 Project: 0588483-1 / The Wieland-Davco Corp. / Christian Science First Church Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B*/7000B) Lab LD: Analyzed RDL Lead Concentration Notes 331212222 32PRSV78 The W ieland-Davco 0001 8/23/2012 0.010 % wt <0.010 % Wt Site: Wall / Plaster - Throughout / Ext. - White Client SamDle Pb -CS -02 Collected: 8/22/2012 0002 8/23/2012 0.010 % wt 0.067 % Wt Site: Window / Wood - Ext. - White Client sample Pb -CS -03 Collected: 8/22/2012 Michael Chapman, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory Reporting limit is 0.010% art based on the minimum sample weight Per Ocr SOP. The OC data associated with these results included in this report meet the method OC requirements, unless specifically indicated otherwise. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples receiwed in good condition unless otherwise noted, 'slight modifications to methods applied. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty Is available upon request. Samples analyzed by LA Testing Garden Grove, CA AMA -LAP, LLC El -LAP 101650, CA El -AP 1406 Initial report from 08/23/2012 10:22:16 Test ReportPl3w/RDL-7.26.0 Printed: 8/23/2012 10:22:16 AM Page 1 of 1 nX1, h orruatiori :0� TOBuild Oii Engimedng • Consulting • resting #33 1212 152 Page 1 of 1 W PSI Field Sample & Material Log ti Pb Paint Chain Of Custody Project Name (client): The Wieland-Davco Corp. Project #: 0588483-1 Building/Branch/store M Christian Science First Church Inspector: Greg Archunq /� Sample Date: 8-16-12' Relinquished By: �" � J /—' °� �"1 Relinquished To: (Print). Analyze by Method ® Method EPA 7420 (narrow band spectrometry — Pb only) Address: iture)w / (Date) a Zr 2 Vit: zu hal ature) / (Dale) Method EPA 6010 (wide band spectrometry— all metals) Group # Sample Number Material Location Sample Location Color Cond. Qty. 1 Pb -CS -01 Wall / Plaster Throughout / Auditorium White G 30,000 sf If multiple layers list colors from top to bottom (e.g. red/green/blue) Send Analysis Results to the Attention of Greg Archunq Requested Turnaround Time: Same Day _ 24 -Hour 48 -Hour 72 -Hour _ 3-5 Days S\Dx: T-kF �11e� Rci Infolnlntiot. MAIN <TOBuiId 011 Engfneedng , Consuf M • restlng #331212222 Page 1 of 1 PSI Field Sample & Material Log Pb Paint Chain Of Custody Project Name (client): The Wieland-Davco Cori). Project #: 0588483-1 Building/Branch/Store #: Christian Science First Church Inspector: Greg Archunq Sample Date: 8-21-12 Address: 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach, Ca Relinquished By: (Print)Q Relinquished To:����� � ,- (P Analyze by Method ® Method EPA 7420 (narrow band spectrometry — Pb only) (Signature) / (Date) Method EPA 6010 (wide band spectrometry — all metals) Group # Sample Number Material Location Sample Location Color Cond. Qty. 1 Pb -CS -02 Wall / Plaster Throughout / Exterior White P 100 SF 2 Pb -CS -03 Window / Wood Exterior White P 50 SF 'If multiple layers list colors from top to bottom (e.g. red/green/blue) Send Analysis Results to the Attention of Greg Archunq Requested Turnaround Time: Same Day _ 24 -Hour 48 -Hour 72 -Hour _ 3-5 Days CODES AND REGULATIONS -ASBESTOS AND LEAD Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-1 CODES AND REGULATIONS - ASBESTOS Federal regulations which govern asbestos abatement work or hauling and disposal of asbestos waste materials include but are not limited to the following: U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Asbestos Regulations Title 29, Part 1910, Section 1001 of the Code of Federal Regulations Final Rule Title 29, Part 1926, Section 1101 of the Code of Federal Regulations Respiratory Protection Title 29, Part 1910, Section 134 of the Code of Federal Regulations Construction Los Anoeles Title 29, Part 1926, of the Code of Federal Regulations Access to Employee Exposure & Medical Records Title 29, Part 1910, Section 20 of the Code of Federal Regulations Hazard Communication Title 29, Part 1910, Section 1200 of the Code of Federal Regulations Specifications for Accident Prevention Signs and Tags Title 29, Part 1910, Section 145 of the Code of Federal Regulations Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) including but not limited to: Worker Protection Rule 40 CFR Part 763, Subpart G CPTS 62044, FLR 2843-9 Federal Register, Vol. 50, No. 134, 7/12/85 P28530-28540 Regulation for Asbestos Title 40, Part 61, Subpart A of the Code of Federal Regulations National Emission Standard for Asbestos Title 40, Part 61, Subpart M of the Code of Federal Regulations including NESHAP Revision; Final Rule, Federal Register; Tuesday, November 20, 1990. Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) Regulations 40 CFR 763 Subpart E Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-1 CODES AND REGULATIONS — ASBESTOS, continued U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) including but not limited to: Hazardous Substances: Final Rule Regulation 49 CFR, Parts 171 and 172 Uniform Fire Code: Asbestos Removal UFC Section 87.106, 87.102 Standards which govern asbestos abatement work or hauling and disposal of asbestos waste materials include but are not limited to the following: American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Fundamentals Governing the Design and Operation of Local Exhaust Systems Publication Z9.2-79 Practices for Respiratory Protection Publication Z88.2-80 Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-1 CODES AND REGULATIONS - LEAD-BASED PAINT Federal and state regulations which govern lead-based paint work or hauling and disposal of lead- based paint waste materials include but are not limited to the following: FEDERAL Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Interim Guidelines OSHA Lead In Construction 29 CFR 1926.62 NESHAP Emissions Standards 40 CFR 50.12 Lead -Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (LBPPPA), 1970. Title 10 - Residential LBP Hazard Reduction Act, 1992, (amendment for LBPPPA,1970) Resource Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA) Title 17, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Division 1, Chapter 8: Accreditation, Certification and Work Practices for Lead -Based Paint and Lead Hazards Professional Service Industries, Inc. Asbestos and Limited Lead -Based Paint Survey PSI Project#0588483-1 Preliminary Sewer Analysis Tentative Tract 17555 3355 & 3303 Via Lido Newport Beach, California Prepared for: Shubin + Donaldson Architects 3890 La Cumbre Plaza Lane, Suite 200 Santa Barbara, California 93105 Prepared by: CONSULTING, INC. 27156 Burbank Foothill Ranch, California 92610 T. 949.916.3800 F. 949.769.3805 Contact: Dane McDougall June 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Introduction......................................................... B. Methodology....................................................... C. Conclusion........................................................... Report Summary....................................................... Appendix A— Sewer Manhole Monitoring Results.. CONSULTING, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING & SURVEYING ....................................................... 1 ....................................................... 2 ....................................................... 3 ....................................................... 4 ....................................................... 5 3355 & 3303 Via Lido - Newport Beach SEWER STUDY 3355 & 3303 VIA LIDO - NEWPORT BEACH A. Introduction CONSUL -TING, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING & SURVEYING This sewer analysis has been prepared for Shubin + Donaldson Architects, for the proposed project site located at the northwest corner of Via Lido and Via Malaga, in the City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, California. The 1.2 acre site currently contains 3 existing buildings encompassing slightly more than half of the site. The "3355 & 3303 Via Lido' project consists of 23 dwelling. The effluents produced by the site will be conveyed via gravity flow through a proposed onsite 6 -inch sewer main connecting to the existing 15 -inch sewer approximately near the southwest corner of the site along the centerline of Via Lido. The purpose of this analysis is to provide supplemental design information to design the on site sewer system for "3355 & 3303 Via Lido" (23 dwelling units) and to "confirm adequate capacity". Additionally, this report also demonstrates that the proposed sewer design meets the following requirements: a. Peak flows in the 15" existing sewer mains are less than 1/2 full b. For public sewer lines and/or lines that directly connect to public sewer, the flow velocity is 2 feet per second or greater. c. For private sewer lines either the velocity is at least 2 feet per second or the slope of the pipe is a minimum of 2.0%, per the California Plumbing Code (2010). d. Minimum slope is greater than 0.004 ft/ft. Note: These calculations are based on the Preliminary Grading Plan for Tentative Tract No. 17555. Should the layout of the proposed sewer system change in order to meet project needs, the analysis may need to be recalculated. Page 1 SEWER STUDY 3355 & 3303 VIA LIDO - NEWPORT BEACH B. Methodology CONSULTING, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING & SURVEYING The existing project effluent was first measured by collection of data done within an average of 1 -hour data intervals taken from the existing 15" sewer for which the point of connection of the proposed site sewer is located. Per the data collected by ADS Environmental Services it was discovered that flows varied ranging as low as 0.15 MGD and peaking as high as 0.60 MGD. Next, the proposed project effluent was estimated utilizing flows generated on a total DFU basis. As outlined in the table below, DFU counts per each plan type of the proposed project were taken as suggested by Table 7-3 Drainage Fixture Unit Values of the 2010 California Plumbing Code, then multiplying each plan type DFU times the number of plan types. The summation of all DFU counts of all plan types yield a number of 478 total DFU. Using this DFU count and applying the number to Chart A-2 of Appendix A of the 2010 California Plumbing Code, a total demand load of 120 gallons per minute (GPM) is assumed. For our final steps, flow depth and velocity were calculated using the Manning equation for circular pipes based on a roughness coefficient of friction of n=0.011 for PVC sewer pipe and applying our known total Q. Our known Q was taken by converting a peak flow of 0.60 MGD (from the existing effluent) into cubic feet per second (cfs) yielding 0.9299 cfs and adding to the converted demand load of 0.2667 cfs (converted from 120 GPM) totaling to 1.20 cfs. The results of which can be seen in the reports summary outlined at the end of this report. Page 2 PLAN TYPES Island Island Island Harbor Harbor Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 1 Type 2 x10 x1 x1 x3 x8 Toilets 3= 3 DFU 3= 3 DFU 4= 4 DFU 4= 4 DFU 4= 4 DFU U) W Bathtub 2 = 4 DFU 2 = 4 DFU 3 = 6 DFU 2 = 4 DFU 2 = 4 DFU a Bathroom Sink 4= 4 DFU 4= 4 DFU 5= 5 DFU 5= 5 DFU 5= 5 DFU Kitchen Sink 1 = 2 DFU 1 = 2 DFU 1 = 2 DFU 1 = 2 DFU 1 = 2 DFU Lu Dishwasher 1 = 2 DFU none none none none Washer (clothing) 1 = 3 DFU none none none 1 = 3 DFU Shower sin le 1 = 2 DFU 1 =2 DFU 1 = 2 DFU 1 = 2 DFU 1 = 2 DFU Shower multi none none none 1 = 3 DFU 1 = 3 DFU 20 DFU X 15 DFU X 19 DFU X 20 DFU X 23 DFU X TOTAL DFU = 10 = 200 1 = 15 1 = 19 3 =60 8 = 184 478 DFU TOTAL DFU DFU DFU DFU DFU Page 2 SEWER STUDY 3355 & 3303 VIA LIDO — NEWPORT BEACH C. Conclusion The results from this sewer analysis demonstrate the following: CONSULTING, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING LAPID PLANNING & SURVEYING • All public and/or public connected sewer mains meets design criteria and guidelines; a minimum slope of 0.004 ft/ft, cleaning velocity of 2 feet per second or greater, and a peak depth of flow of less than 50 percent. • All private sewer mains meet the minimum slope of 0.004 ft/ft, have a velocity exceeding 2 feet per second or a slope greater than 2%, and a peak depth of flow of less than 50 percent. • See Report Summary for summary of slope, peak Q, and velocity at the point of connection. Page 3 PROP. MANHOL 2.0 INV. \ ).o!�: s^ Pvc 1=2.2,S=3.54% ILT FLOW: 120 gpm SEWER STUDY 3355 & 3303 VIA LIDO — NEWPORT BEACH CONST. MNG, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING & SURVEYING Report Summary Channel Report HY&OW EQMI edm velar AUWG t C1W SDA 2019 by AWO *.ine <Namv Circular Diameter (ft) = 1.25 Invert Elev (ft) = 100.00 Slope (%) = 0.14 N -Value = 0.011 Calculations Compute by: Known Q Known 0 (cfs) = 1.20 Elev (ft) 10200 10150 10100 100 50 100 co 711wfmy. Jun 20 20 3 Highlighted Depth (ft) = 0.57 0 (cfs) = 1.200 Area (sqft) = 0.55 Velocity (Ns) = 2.19 Wetted Perim (ft) = 1.86 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.44 Top Width (ft) = 125 EGL (ft) = 0.64 Section 1 - Reach (ft) Page 4 I Appendix A Sewer Manhole Monitoring 3/21/13 — 3/27/13 NB_04LIDO DateTime M/d/yyyy h:mm:ss tt 3/21/2013 0:00 3/21/2013 1:00 3/21/2013 2:00 3/21/2013 3:00 3/21/2013 4:00 3/21/2013 5:00 3/21/2013 6:00 3/21/2013 7:00 3/21/2013 8:00 3/21/2013 9:00 3/21/2013 10:00 3/21/2013 11:00 3/21/2013 12:00 3/21/2013 13:00 3/21/2013 14:00 3/21/2013 15:00 3/21/2013 16:00 3/21/2013 17:00 3/21/2013 18:00 3/21/2013 19:00 3/21/2013 20:00 3/21/2013 21:00 3/21/2013 22:00 3/21/2013 23:00 3/22/2013 0:00 3/22/2013 1:00 3/22/2013 2:00 3/22/2013 3:00 3/22/2013 4:00 3/22/2013 5:00 3/22/2013 6:00 3/22/2013 7:00 3/22/2013 8:00 3/22/2013 9:00 3/22/2013 10:00 3/22/2013 11:00 3/22/2013 12:00 3/22/2013 13:00 3/22/2013 14:00 "Average=Hourly" "MP1\DFINAL" "inches" "QualityFlag=FALSE" "MPI\QFINAL" "MGD" "QualityVa Iue=FALSE" "MP1\VFINAL" "feet/sec" 2.8 0.267 2.45 2.53 0.209 2.24 2.68 0.233 2.31 2.71 0.245 2.34 2.71 0.241 2.36 2.93 0.298 2.58 3.1 0.329 2.65 3.53 0.507 3.52 3.55 0.52 3.59 3.64 0.558 3.74 3.43 0.488 3.53 3.41 0.486 3.52 3.14 0.4 3.22 3.08 0.377 3.07 3.1 0.377 3.05 3 0.346 2.94 2.92 0.311 2.74 3.09 0.39 3.21 3.15 0.397 3.2 3.31 0.433 3.27 3.34 0.449 3.35 3.28 0.427 3.23 3.19 0.37 2.92 3.08 0.349 2.84 2.67 0.235 2.34 2.49 0.207 2.29 2.55 0.204 2.2 2.55 0.205 2.17 2.57 0.201 2.14 2.77 0.251 2.33 3.11 0.345 2.79 3.45 0.497 3.54 3.6 0.556 3.75 3.62 0.57 3.87 3.48 0.514 3.62 3.42 0.501 3.64 3.27 0.453 3.49 3.31 0.457 3.44 3.15 0.375 2.98 3/22/2013 15:00 3.03 0.372 3.11 3/22/2013 16:00 3.11 0.376 3.07 3/22/2013 17:00 3.16 0.411 3.23 3/22/2013 18:00 3.2 0.431 3.44 3/22/2013 19:00 3.23 0.426 3.34 3/22/2013 20:00 3.43 0.47 3.34 3/22/2013 21:00 3.31 0.433 3.27 3/22/2013 22:00 3.17 0.381 3.07 3/22/2013 23:00 3.04 0.34 2.86 3/23/2013 0:00 2.87 0.284 2.55 3/23/20131:00 2.48 0.199 2.23 3/23/2013 2:00 2.5 0.199 2.2 3/23/2013 3:00 2.58 0.217 2.24 3/23/2013 4:00 2.43 0.194 2.19 3/23/2013 5:00 2.68 0.224 2.25 3/23/2013 6:00 2.79 0.254 2.43 3/23/2013 7:00 3.16 0.361 2.86 3/23/2013 8:00 3.43 0.489 3.51 3/23/2013 9:00 3.69 0.585 3.84 3/23/2013 10:00 3.62 0.582 3.9 3/23/2013 11:00 3.47 0.531 3.81 3/23/2013 12:00 3.29 0.485 3.74 3/23/2013 13:00 3.13 0.396 3.23 3/23/2013 14:00 3.12 0.401 3.28 3/23/2013 15:00 3.11 0.374 3.02 3/23/2013 16:00 3.09 0.377 3.14 3/23/2013 17:00 3.29 0.437 3.31 3/23/2013 18:00 3.19 0.393 3.13 3/23/2013 19:00 3.23 0.411 3.21 3/23/2013 20:00 3.23 0.411 3.21 3/23/2013 21:00 3.26 0.436 3.39 3/23/2013 22:00 3.13 0.371 3.03 3/23/2013 23:00 3.02 0.32 2.72 3/24/2013 0:00 2.91 0.308 2.7 3/24/20131:00 2.75 0.254 2.46 3/24/2013 2:00 2.59 0.23 2.38 3/24/2013 3:00 2.39 0.175 2.04 3/24/2013 4:00 2.58 0.218 2.22 3/24/2013 5:00 2.43 0.187 2.12 3/24/2013 6:00 2.75 0.241 2.36 3/24/2013 7:00 3.02 0.332 2.82 3/24/2013 8:00 3.4 0.472 3.44 3/24/2013 9:00 3.51 0.544 3.82 3/24/2013 10:00 3.57 0.563 3.88 3/24/2013 11:00 3.45 0.515 3.72 3/24/2013 12:00 3.42 0.484 3.51 3/24/2013 13:00 3.16 0.396 3.19 3/24/2013 14:00 3.17 0.388 3.09 3/24/2013 15:00 3.04 0.366 3.12 3/24/2013 16:00 3.1 0.366 2.97 3/24/2013 17:00 3.15 0.38 3.06 3/24/2013 18:00 3.25 0.42 3.26 3/24/2013 19:00 3.22 0.431 3.38 3/24/2013 20:00 3.38 0.474 3.5 3/24/2013 21:00 3.28 0.434 3.35 3/24/2013 22:00 3.24 0.416 3.26 3/24/2013 23:00 2.92 0.29 2.55 3/25/2013 0:00 2.67 0.244 2.4 3/25/20131:00 2.67 0.243 2.36 3/25/2013 2:00 2.48 0.204 2.19 3/25/2013 3:00 2.43 0.179 2.03 3/25/2013 4:00 2.32 0.165 2.02 3/25/2013 5:00 2.59 0.213 2.22 3/25/2013 6:00 2.78 0.262 2.44 3/25/2013 7:00 3.45 0.5 3.6 3/25/2013 8:00 3.62 0.569 3.84 3/25/2013 9:00 3.65 0.571 3.79 3/25/2013 10:00 3.48 0.535 3.83 3/25/2013 11:00 3.43 0.486 3.52 3/25/2013 12:00 3.34 0.454 3.42 3/25/2013 13:00 3.19 0.41 3.29 3/25/2013 14:00 3.12 0.381 3.1 3/25/2013 15:00 3.03 0.34 2.85 3/25/2013 16:00 2.97 0.334 2.88 3/25/2013 17:00 3.11 0.364 2.97 3/25/2013 18:00 3.12 0.373 3 3/25/2013 19:00 3.18 0.394 3.13 3/25/2013 20:00 3.43 0.484 3.48 3/25/2013 21:00 3.29 0.417 3.18 3/25/2013 22:00 3.33 0.436 3.26 3/25/2013 23:00 2.99 0.305 2.64 3/26/2013 0:00 2.87 0.29 2.56 3/26/20131:00 2.48 0.194 2.11 3/26/2013 2:00 2.55 0.199 2.12 3/26/2013 3:00 2.28 0.15 1.89 3/26/2013 4:00 2.51 0.204 2.12 3/26/2013 5:00 2.51 0.207 2.15 3/26/2013 6:00 2.83 0.285 2.56 3/26/2013 7:00 3.38 0.485 3.54 3/26/2013 8:00 3.58 0.543 3.72 3/26/2013 9:00 3.62 O.S67 3.83 3/26/2013 10:00 3.65 0.601 4.03 3/26/2013 11:00 3.5 0.519 3.65 3/26/2013 12:00 3.32 0.464 3.5 3/26/2013 13:00 3.28 0.471 3.62 3/26/2013 14:00 3.15 0.399 3.18 3/26/2013 15:00 3 0.342 2.88 3/26/2013 16:00 3.03 0.371 3.08 3/26/2013 17:00 3.03 0.359 2.98 3/26/2013 18:00 3.18 0.418 3.28 3/26/2013 19:00 3.23 0.414 3.23 3/26/2013 20:00 3.4 0.468 3.42 3/26/2013 21:00 3.2S 0.416 3.24 3/26/2013 22:00 3.32 0.432 3.26 3/26/2013 23:00 3.2 0.382 2.96 3/27/2013 0:00 3 0.322 2.71 3/27/20131:00 2.46 0.192 2.18 3/27/2013 2:00 2.55 0.215 2.25 3/27/2013 3:00 2.33 0.167 1.96 3/27/2013 4:00 2.4 0.186 2.04 3/27/2013 5:00 2.38 0.173 1.98 3/27/2013 6:00 2.79 0.267 2.43 3/27/2013 7:00 3.35 0.433 3.17 3/27/2013 8:00 3.44 0.49 3.54 3/27/2013 9:00 3.5 O.S18 3.64 3/27/2013 10:00 3.58 0.546 3.73 3/27/201311:00 3.52 0.538 3.76 3/27/2013 12:00 3.37 0.467 3.45 3/27/2013 13:00 3.2 0.418 3.28 3/27/2013 14:00 3.16 0.381 3 3/27/2013 15:00 3.05 0.373 3.12 3/27/2013 16:00 2.94 0.342 2.94 3/27/2013 17:00 2.97 0.33 2.83 3/27/2013 18:00 3.2 0.389 3.03 3/27/2013 19:00 3.34 0.434 3.23 3/27/2013 20:00 3.37 0.471 3.46 3/27/2013 21:00 3.29 0.438 3.33 3/27/2013 22:00 3.38 0.458 3.38 3/27/2013 23:00 3.34 0.436 3.2 Project Proposed Land Uses Location Determination/Status Discretionary Actions Request for legislative approvals to accommodate the future redevelopment • General Plan of a portion of the property with a Amendment mixed-use waterfront project. The 300 E. Coast Highway Coastal Land Use Plan Planned Community Development Plan Generally located at the Application submitted. EIR is Amendment Back Bay Landing would allow for the development of a northwesterly corner of east underway Planned Community new enclosed dry stack boat storage Coast Highway and Bayside facility for 140 boats, 61,534 square Drive Development Plan feet of visitor -serving retail and • Lot Line Adjustment recreational marine facilities, and up to 49 attached residential units. City of Newport Beach Public Access and Transient Docks and Expansion of Balboa Marina Balboa Marina 201 E. Coast Highway Application has not yet been Expansion 25 boat slips submitted. • 20,000 SF restaurant • 15,000 SF marine commercial General Plan Amendment, Coastal April 2012: amendments initiated by Land Use Plan Amendment, and the City Council. General Plan Old City Hall ZoningAmendment to change site from Mitigated Negative Declaration Amendment Complex PubliFacilities to Mixed Use and 3300 Newport Boulevard and prepared. Coastal Land Use Plan Redevelopment increase height limit from the 26/35 475 32"d Street January 2013: Planning Commission Amendment height limitation area to 55 feet with 65 Zoning Code feet for architectural projections. Fire recommendation for approval. Amendment Station #2 to remain at current location. City Council consideration pending. • General Plan Amendment Demolition of the approximately 20,500 720 West Bay Avenue, 800 Coastal Land Use Plan Newport Harbor square foot yacht club facility and West Bay Avenue, 711-721 Application submitted and under Amendment Yacht Club construction of a new 23,163 square West Bay Avenue, and 710- Zoning Code foot facility. The yacht club use will 720 Balboa Boulevard review. Amendment remain on the subject property. Planned Development Permit • Conditional Use Permit Project Proposed Land Uses Location Determination/Status Discretionary Actions • Development Agreement • General Plan Amendment to the Circulation Element • Code Amendment Development of 1,375 residential • Pre -annexation Zone dwelling units, a 75 -room resort inn and Generally located north of The FEIR was certified and the Change ancillary resort uses, 75,000 square West Coast Highway, south of project approved by the City on July Planned Community Banning Ranch feet of commercial uses, approximately 19th Street, and east of the 23, 2012. A coastal development Development Plan 51.4 gross acres of parklands, and Santa Ana River per from the California Coastal • Master Development approximately 252.3 gross acres of Commission is required. permanent open space. plan • Tentative Tract Map • Affordable Housing Implementation Plan • Traffic Phasing Ordinance Traffic Study The North Newport Center The North Newport CenterAs of September 5, 2012, the PC Development Plan serves as the Planned Community District is remaining entitlement consists of controlling zoning ordinance for the comprised of seven sub -areas 31,233 square feet (includes SF North Newport sub -areas identified in the that include associated with 1Fas unbuilt theater Addendum to the Center Planned Planned Community Development Plan Fashion Island and Block 600 seats) of retail Fashion Island; General Plan Program Community and is authorized and intended to and portions of Block 100, n Plaza; dwelling units in San Joaquin Plaza; EIR implement the provisions Block 400, Block 500, Block and 288,975 square feet of office in of the Newport Beach General Plan. 800, and San Block 500. Joaquin Plaza. Development of 17 individual residential • IS/MND lots; 1 common recreational lot with IS/MND and project approved in Code Amendment 919 Bayside Dr possible pool and trellis structure; 2 919 Bayside Dr; southwest of 2008. The CDP has been approved • Use Permit Project space lots; waterfront Bayside Dr and Jamboree Rd by the Coastal Commission. Project • TTM and dock lots. and lots. has not been constructed. CDP (CCC) Project Proposed Land Uses Location Determination/Status Discretionary Actions Residential development including the • EIR following: (a) the demolition of the w Final EIR was certified and project GP Amendment existing residential structures on the 201-207 Carnation Ave and approved the City on July 14, • Coastal Land Use Plan 1.4 -acre site; (b) the development of 8 101 Bayside PI; southwest of 2009. Project currently in litigation. (CLUP) Amendment AERIE Project residential condominium units; and (c) Bayside Dr between Bayside The CDP has been approved by the Zone Change the replacement, reconfiguration, and PI and Carnation Ave, Corona Coastal Commission. Project has not . Tract Map expansion of the existing gangway del Mar been constructed. . Modification Permit platform, pier walkway, and dock facilities on the site. • CDP (CCC) IS/MND and project approved August Coast Community 2009. Pursuant to the City's Traffic College District- 505-1533 Monrovia Ave; west Phasing Ordinance, a traffic study is • IS/MND Newport Beach 3 -story, 67,000-sf learning facility of Monrovia Ave and north of required. The traffic study and parcel • Parcel Map Learning Center the terminus of 15 1h St map were approved by the City on . Traffic Study Project April 22, 2010. The project has been constructed and is complete. • EIR • GP Amendment Hoag Memorial Reallocation of up to 225,000 sf of Final EIR certified and project . Planned Community Hospital previously approved (but not 1 Hoag Dr; northwest West proved on May 13, 2008. No new Development Plan (PC) Presbyterian Master constructed) square footage from the rt Coast Hwy and Newport Blvd development has been constructed. Text Amendment Plan Update Project Lower Campus to the Upper Campus. . Development Agreement Amendment • CDP (CCC) Improvements to the existing hotel Final EIR certified and project • EIR Hyatt Regency which include the addition of 88 new 1107 Jamboree Rd; northwest approved on February 24, 2009. The Use Permit Newport Beach timeshare units; a 24,387-sf, 800 -seat of Back Bay Dr and Jamboree project has not obtained a CDP; Parcel Map Expansion Project ballroom/meeting building, a 10,arking 072-sf Rd therefore, the City's entitlements Modification Permit 2' -level p spa and new pool; and a 2 cannot be implemented. • Development Agreement garage. CDP (CCC) Relocation of City Hall (except for the Fire Department). Construction and Final EIR certified and project operation of the following: (a) an approved on November 24, 2009. Newport Beach City approximate 98,000-sf City Hall 1100 Avocado Ave; between Project construction began in May EIR Hall and Park building, Community Room, and Avocado Ave and MacArthur 2010. Construction complete, with Design plans Development Council Chambers; (b) a 450 -space Blvd exception of park improvements. Exemption from Zoning Project parking structure; (c) an approximate Park improvements estimated to be Code and PC 27 17,000-sf expansion of the Newport complete in May 2013. Beach Central Library; and (d) construction of a public park. Project Proposed Land Uses Location Determination/Status Discretionary Actions 79 condominium units totaling • IS/MND approximately 205,232 net sf; • GP Amendment approximately 97,231 gross sf of IS/MND and project approved in CLUP Amendment Santa Barbara subterranean parking structures fora Santa Barbara Drive west of . January 2006The CDP has been • Code Amendment Condominiums total of 201 parking spaces on site; Fashion Island approved by the Coastal • Parcel Map Project approximately sf Open space Commission. Plan check has been ' TTM and approximaatelytely 21,, 300 sf of submitted for building permits. Modification Permit recreational area. CDP (CCC) Draft IS/MND was released for public review on January 12, 2010. Planning Commission recommended 2000-2016 East Balboa Blvd ; approval on March 41 2010. The GP Amendment Beauchamp Project 5 unit residential development east of East Balboa Street and IS/MND and the project were • CLUP Amendment L Street approved by the City Council on May • CDP (CCC) 25, 2010. The CDP has been approved by the Coastal Commission. Project has not been constructed. Newport Business Demolition of 2 existing connected 4699 Jamboree Road and The City Council approved the GP Amendment Plaza Project buildings to construct new 46,044 5190 Campus Drive project on January 25, 2011. • PC text amendment gross square foot business s plaza. Tentative Parcel Map FEIR certified in February 2006. Site Plan Review Newport Marina — A mixed use development consisting of 2300 Newport Boulevard Tentative Tract Map extended in Use Permit ETCO Development 27 residential units and approximately October 2010. Building permits 36,000 square feet of retail and office issued Feb 2012. ' Tentative Tract Map uses • EIR • General Construction Development includes a public park Activity Storm Water and beach with recreational facilities; The Final EIR was certified and the (Permit restrooms; a new Girl Scout House; a 1600 Balboa Blvd; west of 15 m project approved by the City on May WQCB) (RWQCB Marina Park Project public short-term visiting vessel marina Stand east of 19t' St 11, 2010. The CDP application has CDP (CCC) and sailing center; and a new been approved. Construction is community center with classrooms, and proposed to start mid-year 2013 Section 401 Certification ancillary office space. (RWQCB) • 404 Permit (ACOE) Project Proposed Land Uses Location Determination/Status Discretionary Actions A 12,763 sq. ft. addition to an existing 17,500 sq. ft. medical office complex. . Planned Development Mariner's Medical The existing medical office complex 1901 Westcliff Dr Application was withdrawn 1/22/13. Permit Arts Project was designed by Master architect • Conditional Use Permit Richard Neutra and is considered to be significant historical resource. Final EIR and project approved on EIR Megonigal 3,566 sf, single -family residence. 2333 Pacific Dr, Corona del January 12, 2010. The CDP has Modification Permit Residence Project Mar been approved. Building permits have been issued for this project. Demolition of existing tennis and golf The City Council approved the clubhouses to construct a new 3,735 sf construction of a new 3,735 sf. tennis - Development Agreement tennis clubhouse and 35,000 sf golf clubhouse, 27 hotel units with 0 PC Development Plan clubhouse. Included in the project are spa/fitness area and concierge and Amendment Golf Realty Tennis 27 short-term visitor-serving units 1600 East Coast Hwy guest meeting facilities; and five TTM Club (bungalows); a bungalow spa/fitness single -family residential dwelling . Transfer of Development area and concierge and guest meeting units. The project was approved by Rights facilities; and five single -family the City Council on 03/27/2012. CDP (CCC) residential dwelling units (villas). Approved by Coastal Commission April 2013. . General Plan Amendment Demolition of existing golf course and 1600 -East Coast Highway; This project was approved by the City . Planned Community Newport Beach clubhouse to construct of a new 51,213 northwest of Pacific Coast Council on 02/28/2012. Approved by (PC) Text Adoption Country Club Inc sf golf clubhouse and ancillary facilities Highway and Newport Center Coastal Commission December Temporary Use Permit including a cart barn and bag storage. Drive 2012. . Development Agreement . CDP (CCC) Increase the maximum allowable entitlement by 11,544 gross sf; increase An IS/MND was released for public PRIES Office the maximum allowable entitlement in review on May 19, 2010. The MND . GP Amendment Building B Project office suite B by 9,917 net sf to allow for 4300 Von Karmen Ave was certified and the project . PC Text Amendment development of a new 2-level office approved by the City Council on . Parcel Map building over a ground-level parking February 22, 2011. structure. Demolition of 3 existing buildings to • Modification Permit Old Newport GPA construct a new 25,000-sf medical 328, 332, and 340 Old IS/MND and project approved on . Traffic Study Project office building. Newport Blvd March 9, 2010. No activity. . Use Permit . GP Amendment Rhine Channel Dredging of approximately 150,000 In the vicinity of Marina Park, An IS/MND and conceptual project . Section 404 Permit Contaminated cubic yards of contaminated sediments the American Legion Post, were approved by City Council on (USACE) Project Proposed Land Uses Location Determination/Status Discretionary Actions Sediment Cleanup within portions of Lower Newport and 15" Street July 27, 2010. Project complete. . Section 10 Permit Project Harbor, specifically from the Rhine (USACE) Channel and nearby areas bayward of • 401 Water Quality Marina Park, the American Legion Post Certification (RWQCB) and 15°h Street. Transport sediment by . CDP (CCC) ocean barge for disposal and beneficial . Dredging Lease reuse within the approved Port of Long (California State Lands Beach Middle Harbor Redevelopment Commission) Project confined aquatic disposal facility. The Final EIR was certified and the • EIR Develop the approximate 18.9 -acre site project approved by the City on . Site Plan Sunset Ridge Park with active and passive recreational Northwest of West Coast Hwy March 23, 2010. Coastal Commission . CDP (CCC) Project uses and an access road to the park and Superior Ave has approved the project in August . Streambed Alteration through Newport Banning Ranch. 2012. Construction is anticipated to Agreement (CDFG) begin in 2013. . Section 7 (USFWS) . PC Development Plan Amendment Kell Mixed Use Development of 260 residential units 4343 Von Karman Avenue Application submitted. No activity. • Traffic Study (TPO) Development DA . Airport Land Use Commission EIR, Tentative Tract Map, Traffic • PC Development Plan Study, and AHIP were approved by Amendment and City Council on 2/26/2013. The PC Adoption Uptown Newport Development of 1,244 residential units Development Plan and Development • Tentative Tract Map Mixed Use and 11,500 sf. of commercial retail 4311 & 4321 Jamboree Rd Agreement were approved on . Traffic Study (TPO) Development 3/12/2013. Applicant is currently . AHIP processing parcel map application to . DA allow for future conveyance of . Airport Land Use parcels. Commission . Tentative Tract Map . MUP Plaza Corona del Development of 1,750 sf new office 3900-3928 East Coast Application approved by Planning . CUP Mar space and six (6) detached townhomes. Highway Commission on 1/03/13. No activity. . Site Development Review . Zoning Code Amendment 11 Project Proposed Land Uses I Location I Determination/Status I Discretionary Actions 11 Mariner's Pointe MacArthur at Dolphin -Striker Way Lido Villas (DART) A 19,905-sf, building and structure. Demolition of 12,351 sf development. two-story commercial a three-story parking 200-300 West Coast Highway a 7,996-sf restaurant commercial retail 14221 Dolphin -Striker Way Request for the demolition of an existing church and office building and legislative approvals for the 3303 and 3355 Via Lido development of 23 attached three-story Generally bounded by townhome condominiums. The Planned Lido, Via Oporto, and Community would allow for site specific Malaga. setbacks and an increase in the height limit up to 35 ft 4 inches and 39 ft for architectural projections. An IS/MND was released for public review on April 11, 2011. The MND was certified and the project approved by the City Council on August 9, 2011. Development under construction. MND, Transfer of Development Rights, Traffic Study, CUP, Waiver of DA, and Modification Permit were approved by City Council on October 25, 2011. PC Development Plan Amendment approved on November 22, 2011. Under construction Via Application submitted 10/24/12. MND Via is underway • GP Amendment • Code Amendment • CUP • Variance • Site Development Review • Traffic Study • PC Development Plan Amendment • Transfer of Development Rights • Traffic Study (TPO) • CUP • Waiver of DA • Modification Permit • General Plan Amendment • Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment • Zoning Code Amendment • Planned Community Development Plan • Tentative Tract Map AELUP: Airport Environs Land Use Plan; CDP: Coastal Development Permit; CUP: Conditional Use Permit; cy: cubic yards; DA: Development Agreement; DTSP: Downtown Specific Plan; EIR: Environmental Impact Report; FAA: Federal Aviation Administration; GPA: General Plan Amendment; gsf: gross square feet; HBGS: Huntington Beach Generating Station; 1- 405: Interstate 405 freeway; IBC: Irvine Business Complex; IS: Initial Study; ITC: Irvine Technology Center; LAFCO: Local Agency Formation Commission; LCP: Local Coastal Program; MCAS: Marine Corps Air Station; MND: Mitigated Negative Declaration; ND: Negative Declaration; PA: Planning Area; PC: Planned Community; sf: square feet; SP: Specific Plan; SR -73: State Route 73; TDR: transfer of development rights; TPM: Tentative Parcel Map; TTM: Tentative Tract Map; VTTM: Vesting Tentative Tract Map; ZC: Zone Change DART LIDO VILLAS - 3355 & 3303 VIA LIDO Trip Generation Rates Land Use Rate Type Unit AM Peak Hour In Out Total PM Peak Hour In Out Total Church ITE 560 TSF 0.35 0.21 0.56 0.26 0.29 0.55 N581 General Office Bldg ITE 710 TSF 1.36 0.19 1.55 0.25 1.24 1.49 Residential Condo/Townhouse ITE 230 DU 0.07 0.37 0.44 0.35 0.17 0.52 Land Use Rate Type Size Unit AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Existing Church ITE 560 8.961 TSF 3 2 5 2 3 5 82 Office ITE 710 32.469 TSF 44 6 50 8 40 48 357 Sub -Total Proposed 47 8 55 11 43 53 439 Residential Condo I ITE 230 1 231 DU 1 8 9 8 4 12 134 Net (Proposed - Existing) -46 0 -46 -3 -39 -41 -305 05/01/2013 v O t 0 y C V Y i yM C m o N G R d V m N E N V Construction Phase W JO N LL U tC C 3 Demo 1 2 1 1 Site Grading 1 2 Foundation 1 1 1 1 Building Construction 1 1 2 2 Site Concrete 1 1 Jeramey Harding From: Nova, Makana <MNova@newportbeachca.gov> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 3:02 PM To: Jeramey Harding Subject: FW: FW: 3355: MND: Additional Information Requested Follow Up Flag: Follow up Due By: Monday, May 27, 2013 4:00 PM Flag Status: Flagged Hi Jeramey, Here are the applicants responses to your questions regarding the project construction, below in red. HAAoW-A AIoNR I ASSISTANT PLANNER Planning Division I City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive I Newport Beach, CA 92660 P. 949.644.3249 1 F. 949.644.3203 m nova Cal new oortbea chca. a ov www. new port be a ch ca. go From: Justin Park fmailto:Justin.Park(cbwieland-davco.com] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 2:01 PM To: Sieglinde Pukke Cc: Nova, Makana Subject: Re: FW: 3355: MND: Additional Information Requested Sieglinde & Makana, See responses below in RED. Thanks, Justin Park Project Manager The Wieland-Davco Corp. Project Office 949-723-0279 Mobile: 517-819-0784 I ustin. parkCcDwieland-davco.com Our Mission - The Wieland-Davco Corporation is dedicated to finding and serving lifelong clients through excellence in construction. We develop loyal customers through relentless customer service and empower our employees to transform our clients into our champions. From: Sieglinde Pukke <spukke(a)sandarc.com> To: Justin Park <Justin.ParkC&wieland-davco.com>, Date: 05/24/2013 01:39 PM Subject: FW: 3355: MND: Additional Information Requested Hi Justin, Please see below email from Makana. Can you please provide the responses by Monday? Thank you, Sieglinde Pukke PRINCIPAL, AIA, LEED A.P. SHUBIN+DONALDSON ARCHITECTS,INC. Tel. 805 682 7000 eat. 131 From: Nova, Makana fmaiIto: MNova(cbnewoortbeachca.gov] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 1:21 PM To: Sieglinde Pukke Subject: Additional Information Requested Hi Sieglinde, The first draft of the MND has now been submitted by T&B and the City will be reviewing the document over the next week or so. Can you please provide the following information for the Lido Villas MND? 1. Provide clarification as to which construction phase(s) will require the maximum number of workers described in the text. Rough Framing & Rough -in M.E.P as those activities will overlap. 2. We assume that Via Lido will be partially closed during the construction of the Project's sewer connection (off-site). Please identify how long the partial closure of Via Lido will occur. We would need closure for a week to excavate, install & connect, and temp patch, and then 2 days to a week to repave depending on the extent City requires to repave. 3. How long is the demolition phase of construction expected to last (so we can fully disclose the Project's anticipated impact due to solid waste). Demolition is scheduled for two months. Let me know if you have any questions about the information requested. Have a nice holiday weekend! M.cUs,^A64 ( ASSISTANT PLANNER Planning Division I City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive I Newport Beach, CA 92660 P. 949.644.3249 1 F. 949.644.3203 m nova @ n ew oortbea ch ca, cLov www.newportbeachca.gov SHUBIN+DONALDSON ARCHITECTS INC. January 3, 2013 PROJECT REGARDING tall 3355 and 3303 Via Lido Environmental Information Response Dear Mr. Jim Campbell, The following is our response to the information requested as part of the City's Environmental Information Form. C. Environmental Setting 1. The subject parcel is made up of two properties. The first property is occupied by the Lido Building, a commercial three story office building at 3355 Via Lido. Immediately adjacent at 3303 Via Lido is the First Church of Christ Scientist property. The existing buildings on the site are tired, old and unredeemed by architectural merit. The remainder of the site is given over to parking for these existing uses. The site is flat, developed and without issues pertaining to plants and animals or to cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Please refer to Sheet D-1 for photographs of the existing property. 2. The project site is part of what the Lido Village Conceptual Plan calls the Lido Triangle. It is bordered by Via Lido , Via Malaga and Via Oporto. Across Via Lido are two story single family waterfront residential properties. To the south facing the site on Via Malaga is Saint James Anglican Church. Opposite on Via Oporto is parking for Via Lido Plaza. Occupying the northern -most tip of the triangle is a one story commercial building that houses a real estate office. The submittal includes a site section on Sheet D-17 that indicates heights and setbacks as they relate to the existing context. Also included on Sheet D-2 are photographs that illustrate the existing site context. D. Potential Environmental Effects i. Aesthetics. The existing properties are fully developed along Via Lido and afford no public or private scenic views through the site. The proposed development is broken into 5 buildings which will afford a number of view corridors through the site. In addition, the proposed project has been designed with animated, street focused facades 3890 La Cumbre Plaza Lane, Suite 200 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93105 T. 805.966.2802 • F. 805.966.3002 SHUBIN+DONALDSON ARCHITECTS INC. that will enhance pedestrian and vehicular view corridors. Exterior Lighting will be designed to reduce light and glare impacts on surrounding properties 4 ii. Agricultural& Forest Resources. None iii. Air Quality. Dust Control measures such as dampening soils and construction roadways will be used during construction to prevent blowing dust to adjacent properties. Also Low VOC products and materials will be used whenever possible during the construction phase of the project. iv. Biological Resources. None V. Cultural Resources. The site was previously developed from imported fill so there will be no archaeological or paleontological impact on the site. The project will cause no adverse physical or aesthetic effects to any building, structure or object having historical or religious significance. vi. Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Site constraints and logistics will limit the use of large equipment during the construction process. When possible natural gas lifts/equipment will be used. Energy conservation measures such as dual glazing, better insulation than required by T-24, low energy lighting, the use of ENERGY STAR appliances and fixtures, solar water heating and drought -tolerant landscaping will be part of the project development. Amenities are in walking distance of 1/4 mile around the project and public transportation is available. vii. Geology&Soils. A Geotechnical Report was prepared by Professional Services Industries, Inc. (PSI) dated August 24th, 2012. The report characterizes the site soils as soft and compressible. Deep foundation systems have been recommended to support the proposed structures. Proposed grading forthe site will be designed to match existing surface elevations as much as possible. Building finish floors are slightly elevated to provide minimum freeboard to estimated 100 - year water surface elevations. 3890 La Cumbre Plaza Lane, Suite 200 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93105 T. 805.966.2802 . F. 805.966.3002 SHUBIN+DONALDSON ARCHITECTS INC. It is estimated that less than 800 cy of fill will be required to achieve the desired proposed grade. viii. Hazards & Hazardous Material. There is no risk to public health due *91 to normal operations or due to an explosion or due to the release of hazardous substances. There is no known possibility of previous contamination. The site is designated within the 0.2 percent annual chance of flood hazard. The area is not located in the 100 year flood zone. ix. Hydrology&Water Quality. The proposed development is located on the Balboa Peninsula, in the City of Newport Beach. The Pacific Ocean is located about 2,000 feet to the west of the site, and the Newport Bay is located about 170 feet to the east of the site. The topography of the site slopes gently in a northwest direction, at a rate of no more than a third of a percent. Underground storm drain facilities do not exist adjacent to the site. Storm water runoff presently surface flows off the site to the adjacent public streets (Via Lido, Via Oporto and Via Malaga) where they are collecting in surface gutters and conveyed to the north. From there flows are collecting in an off-site catch basin where they empty into the adjacent Newport Bay. The property is designated in FEMA Flood Zone "X" shaded, areas considered to be outside of the 100 -year floodplain, but inside the 500 -year floodplain. Typical to the Balboa Peninsula area, groundwater was found at shallow depths (up to five feet from the surface). Existing land use consists of multiple structures and a parking lot. The existing property is considered to be nearly all impervious. The proposed development will improve this situation by providing some landscaped features in common areas and the front of the proposed homes. Overall peak flows from the property are anticipated to be Less than or equal to existing pre development flows. In landscaped areas, the use of area drain inlets will be employed to reduce storm water from transporting sediments over flatwork 3890 La Cumbre Plaza Lane, Suite 200 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93105 T. 805.966.2802 • F. 805.966.3002 SHUBIN+DONALDSON ARCHITECTS INC. improvements. Area drains will curb core to adjacent public streets per public standards. Water quality BMPs will be employed per City of Newport Beach Model WQMP requirements. Hydraulic Conditions of Concern are not tote anticipated because the proposed development will not be increasing overall storm water runoff volumes. X. Land Use & Planning For a description of the existing site and context please refer to Section C above. Lido Village is primarily developed with commercial uses including a grocery store, restaurants, salons, home furnishings, apparel, and other specialty shops. It also includes Lido Marina Village, a pedestrian -oriented waterfront development that includes visitor -serving commercial uses, specialty stores, and marine uses. The guiding General Plan goal for Lido Village is to create a mixture of land uses within a pedestrian -oriented village environment. To facilitate these uses, a portion of the Lido Village General Plan subarea has been designated Multiple Residential (RM(20/ac)). The RM(2O/ac) designation is intended to provide multi -family residential development containing attached or detached dwelling units up to 20 dwelling units per acre. The subject parcel is made up of two properties. The first property at 3355 Via Lido is zoned RM. Immediately adjacent on Via Lido is the First Church of Christ Scientist property. It is currently zoned PI. We request the required City approvals and a Local Coastal Program, Coastal Land Use Plan (CLUP) Amendment to change the land use designation of the property at 3303 and 3315 Via Lido to an RM (Multiple Unit Residential) land use designation and density as part of this application. xi. Mineral Resources. For energy conservation measures, please refer to Section D.vi above. Additionally, there is no known mineral resource of future value to the region or the state onsite. xii. Noise. Construction will be limited to the city's approved work hours. Sources of noise during construction will be concrete saws, jackhammers and demolition equipment during the demolition phase. Concrete trucks and metal saws will generate noise during the new construction phase. 3890 La Cumbre Plaza Lane, Suite 200 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93105 T. 805.966.2802 • F. 805.966.3002 SHUSIN+DONALDSON ARCHITECTS INC. xiii. Population&Housing. Based on the residential capacities calculated in the Housing Element of the City's General Plan, approximately 70 new residential units could realistically be developed in Lido Village as new and replacement housing. In the proposed project, there are 24 townhouses that will be market rate with an average selling price tote between $2-2.5 million per unit. Units will have between 2 -3 bedrooms per unit an expected average household size of 2-3. xiv. Public Services. The proposed development of 24 townhouses will be less intensive than the existing commercial and church development in terms of demand on government services (fire, police, schools, transportation). xv. Recreation. The 24 unit project will not impact demand for regional parks or other recreational opportunities. xvi. Transportation/ Traffic. The project will include a public pedestrian path at the north end of the site that will improve pedestrian circulation in the Lido Triangle. xvi i. Utilities & Service Systems. Sewer/Wastewater, Public sewer infrastructure exists near the proposed development. A 15 -inch mainline exists in Via Lido and will serve as the connection point for the site. Each townhome will be individually sewered and connect to a public mainline on-site. A specific capacity report was not available from the City Public Works department to confirm if capacity was available, although conversations with City staff indicate that no capacity issues are expected. A week long sewer monitoring report will be prepared to confirm existing sewer capacity is adequate to serve the proposed project. Existing sewer laterals to the site will be capped off at the right-of- way. The existing laterals served the on-site buildings which are proposed to be demolished. Storm Water Drainage: No underground storm drain exists directly adjacent to the site. The proposed development is designed to convey storm water flows 3890 La Cumbre Plaza Lane, Suite 200 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93105 T. 805.966.2802 • F. 805.966.3002 SHUSIN+DONALDSON ARCHITECTS INC. through surface drainage to adjacent public streets or by collection into small area drain systems on-site which curb core to the adjacent public streets. Domestic Water: *91 Public water mains exist in Via Lido, Via Oporto and Via Malaga. An on-site public water main is proposed to service the development. Each townhouse will be individually metered from the public on-site system. On December 17, 2012 a fire flow test was performed by City staff at the southeast corner of the property to confirm water pressure and capacity. Available flow was estimated to be in excess of 3,500 gpm at 20 psi minimum. No upgrades to the existing perimeter water system are proposed. Best regards, Sieglinde Pukke, AIA 3890 La Cumbre Plaza Lane, Suite 200 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93105 T. 805.966.2802 • F. 805.966.3002 LIDO VILLAS (DART) (PA2012-146) 3303/3355 Via Lido Newport Beach, CA 92663 T&B Kick -Off Meeting May 1, 2013 General Project Description The applicant requests demolition of an existing church and office building and approval for the development of 23 attached three-story townhome condominiums, constructed in five separate building blocks. The following approvals are requested or required in order to implement the project as proposed: 1. General Plan Amendment -to change the land use of the property at 3303 Via Lido from PI (Private Institutions) to RM (Multi -Unit Residential). 2. Zoning Code Amendment -to change the zoning designations of the properties at 3303 Via Lido from PI (Private Institutions) and 3355 Via Lido from RM (Multi - Unit Residential) and establish a Planned Community Development Plan over the entire project site with development standards for a new 23 unit townhouse style multi -family units. 3. Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment -to change the land use of the property at 3303 Via Lido from PI -B (Private Institutions) to RM -D (Multi -Unit Residential). 4. Planned Development Permit -to allow an adjustment and establishment of setbacks and height development standards to accommodate the 23 unit multi- family development on a site that is greater than 1 acre in size. 5. Tract Map -to combine six parcels and establish a 23 -unit condominium tract. 6. Mitigated Negative Declaration- to comply with the requirements of and evaluate environmental impacts relative to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Site Area: 52,099 sq ft (1.196 acres) Existing Uses: o 3303 Via Lido: First Church of Christ, Scientist -8,584 sq ft (1947, add 1958 and 1966) c, 3355 Via Lido: Cal Beach Office Building -32,469 gross sq ft (1957) Setbacks: The Planned Community Development Plan suggests the establishment of the following setbacks for the project site: o Via Lido: 8 ft 10 inches at first floor 4 ft 5 inches at second floor o Via Oporto: 6 ft at first floor 3 ft at second floor o Via Malaga: 11 ft at first floor 6 ft 6 inches at second floor o Setback adjacent to Nonresidential Use Districts: 3 ft Open Space: Common open space (2,483 SF) in four areas of the project site with a water feature, landscaping, and hardscape areas for the owner's use. Each Unit will have 437-539 SF of private open space provided between second floor balconies and roof decks. Parking: 2 attached garage spaces provided per dwelling unit, 0.5 guest spaces per unit (12 spaces) provided in a surface parking area Floor Area: Units of 2,400-3,200 SF each Height: The standard MFR height limit is 287 33'. The Planned Community Development Plan suggests the establishment of the following height limits for the project site: • 35 ft 4 inches to the top of rail at the roof deck • 39 ft for architectural projections and stairwell access to the roof deck Fees: Below is an estimation of the project related impact fees: a. Fair Share Fee: ($1,659/unit x 23 units)— (32.469 sq ft x $2,507/TSF) - (8.961 sq ft x $1,485/TSF) _ $0.00 (the applicant receives a credit toward fair share fees for existing uses on-site) b. Housing In -Lieu: $20,513/unit x 23 = $471,799.00 (No affordable housing units will be provided as part of the project) c. Park Fees: $26,125/unit x 23 = $600,875.00 d. TOTAL = $1,072,674.00 Lido Villas -DART 05-01-13 Planned construction characteristics: Estimated total time duration anticipated for construction activities; 24 months 2. Estimated amount of demolition debris that will be disposed of off-site, and name/address of the disposal location if known; All demolition debris will be disposed of off-site. Location not determined yet. 3. Estimated amount of demolition debris that will be recycled and reused on-site or off-site. Unknown at this time, however anything that can be recycled will be done off-site. 4. Hours of construction activities (if different from the standards specified in the City's Municipal Code); The construction hours should not deviate from those specified in the City's Municipal Code Section 10.28.040 (Construction Activity -Noise Regulations). 5. A description (including drawings, if needed) of any off-site improvements needed to implement the project; Refer to project plans. 6. A list of construction equipment anticipated to be used during project construction (if this is not known, the construction -level air quality analysis can rely on model defaults); and Excavators & Bulldozers for Grading, Tower Crane, Fork -lifts & Boom Lifts for Vertical Construction. 7. Total number of employees anticipated during construction (if known). Approximately 50 to 80 workers on the project, however there will be periods with significantly less workers. Exhibit "B" Mitigation Monitoring Report Program 20 2 mj Y b u • w • C U] c L Y N d J C • O O U C U N N � v A E c S 12 p C Q N U Y T C U s' O N L Y 'E E °0 L L N c o L o E c 0 d a a u L L O u d N � f0 Y 0 c p C U a o v a o a i • Y Z Q L • a u Y O C • U N Z,� C dUUm v `o v v Lp c p Ui Y 0 0 0 u N c d A « N v W J �N a0_+ LO A aL.i O N m L j E Y AC No A aCA aA+ v u t N C 3 A EO aLW Y C Lm O U U m � L N` p AN U O O UC OO CCb0 u N p 0 a c n vb 3 cOi i y A o a — O O L v au+ �. v v L O N ro c c E c o a IL- I c E 'A c E w c o 'o^ _ .p « a O Ar Y Y U N O L aL yaa p Yl C` p Y M A N A A C A L O y C • O L« N; p a W) M d O N y C N^ d T C Y L A A N« Y a iy Y C N N E u .Y ,C Y C A Y .M... N A tatl 0 T C Y J Y N L L p L u C O O_ u 3 CO N U L V L L L C A U L c� h l L p O b U U U a O N v N L A i U W d w2 N a p > v L° `a E° �' E F A v° O d« 3 u 0 UI a m« y FL- J mo, -o W a N E 0 — Y O a U d0 ] v aLC u u a u«$ H« a a F N O a «Vl Y a y J 9 C L y O T O n t A a L " av N • c N p v v u O m E 0 J«= .N O N 0 U j O E *TE T X p a pY a _ 'ij E a m Ec O O O C A A A O u a a i i b 6°n LLc'oEvvOc: Q F- u a u m as E E 60 0 CL 00 C a N OC ed M C 0 0 O F c O b •Y 2 c N " O (D N d C3 0? a) aU C C N gQ 0 a J J Y b u • V1 c L Y al J c0 0 •0 L d ro Y C U N ro P v A E c E c c . o c0 0 v s' L u o ,� Y Y 'E E pa Y C pa L L 0 L O E N c c L c 0 M 'c d .L 0 0 p 'L d d d u u v d b�a� L U C M ro v u v 0 ro ep d U m c c Oo c U d o C O U .. a u N u 0 u ro • a o v '> a o ` a' m Q u Z Q Q u v O ro • • VL O u Y C V L L O U Y` v L L C O O O d C L 3 N N OO d U U m O v i d` U A Q v>> Z 0 0 oa c O v d'o v p U u 'o v v '� U u v D v d O c = L O E C_ o W p Y p O O~ Y C !� —^ � `�- W 3 ro b9 L O O ro 0 C a� c O bq L v J u N O v 0 'c '" a, U E 'O N c N A W c O D C j u t u 'u E O C ,O CO E"_ vpi c _ v v O O 4L-- U c u c 0 ub4 v a c aL. ti - E p L o u a v o y o .a �L, L° u c m '-�. o p u. Z O 'O N ro Y L v V > D w c 0 y N YO cM L L O L p bq y" A N C O O Y Y p Oq E O o .Dq u_ v 0 O w N C '[, U C N U C v E C �,y1 C u >� w Y u > 3 0 Y VI U d 7 t d '� 'L ro Y LLro V Y c d O Y Y L a) d _O 1I� Y O O U 0 l O L >_ p p G! ro L V L v bq D- W E i y L u u L O N W > p O p p u d L W O L C ro N L L N_ S Q C W C � d VI N t N • a) C d y � L O E ro ro Ou U O d N O D O u d c a m u d y N N U W N V p 0 C NO O U> W H 41 Lro bD ;� L d a+ Y L .� O t p v� d T C A G i O ro L w O O N d L Y O E L> N c N .= ? .� d d D O L Y v O v u u o- • 0 v Dau '� ro c v u ro v L v L 0 Z O N u 0 L O N a U � F Y Y o Ou v 0 L C • � O 0 'L O d O � u N Y L O E ro L .Y N d N > d N O u 12 r n O O pa V W L ro C C � L u 0 L m OF -L., `row e`o c N " O (D N d C3 0? a) aU C C N gQ 0 a J J 2 o(D N •- d Y ro V • tr � C V1 s v J O • N C ro J O L O a` c p u • a Q ' • Y u v O a` O> '^ v p N u o r t p O v O gNNC0' •Na' rNCO v�bNU0 > Ly > V?-'\ NNVT WaV! aLtOwN twiC Npv E E U O� vYO 0 a o w O YYY>L C Vy J N Y > - l VO O Z SU VE Ad a U a O C S O ro U LAm pEA OYG LNU $ V a o> Fp>Vm u aN rL roH N Ny o O E L CN O C o aL UOUv _ N O uu • 2 a U a v mUa O LLao O . '� a ''' '• r N m ., _O u a p '^ Y a v U ti m Lo . u s+ O L> .' Ewu : EO v=v u aO Cm UL J m vpO O uE YpLo O NNCs a.Z U m u�O o u m U w oa as O N U Q A L p a N V u F T C • 'o Q a 0 v L S o(D N •- d 2 0 Y A w • c h0 V) c L N O! J c w O w • A y 'E b0 C W L C C c E ° 'LO v c ucq O 15 b0 O T .a C w •_ _ m c U c N c C U uU A a A H • c A .r 0 �-' A u c Q a'O Oa Om A O Q • i A Y^ N L A O c O c O J U V • C C O A a t N V; N A N Y C C U U v Q Z O O a U U v O C C J N U N L b N O U L O C p= O .ate- 3 O' L C= ,C O p •p aL+ A L _ y w b J c .r YE y a Gv Nw E AcR y Lro z?— c°W m p c c wav QS ua=w.EOs'nvwo� o �,a° 0 C Q O d N J� c—cca u . tU� Ya $WL U O E m V C>° V c L 44 c YLYC A • ? y°y NN VwC W V00 u Zw w uCco«.h .ONLN to pm . 2 d OO�OpO Q L« O i _3O �.d- AO a c � �A_ 0`o '�l°c°i n vi = p UA�' _ -'p =ea y u y o v v O m .��a u s n o c E Z `o o V c FLS- Q d av Lav c `o E U a ro H° 0 F 2 N Y � � V N b0 ccQ G d r 0O j O C N S Y L • a p N c N N a N v � N O E Ic L A " C p Y U ,a ° N v O •- 0 v M c E L 0 W 60 0 CL 00 c 0 a w Cc! C A M c 0 0 O F c O b b4 2 O £ u u c L y N OO C O O'D 'L 'Y_ _ O Y L 7 O O E 0 E E v v L a v C v m y L L dC0 O p O U — i ° m Y L C C O O 00-. C p C L y U A • Y c A p J m Y Od° L • v Z Q UO° L D um. N • b0 E o C Y V Y L 4- i a c 0 Y OC C- V 'j co OL a_UUU O O 0 ° z0 cw L N N C O w O a p C Oa L ° O N o.y O L O K N CY`c E NON E E U 0 ° 0 N£ ° uvQ° o omo bJpUvomo N _u O ;°V uU U °Y u m A cO w O Q°T; ,pUW•"ovy AE L ti uapi w 0ol_ pLm3 .'v.A co Se r o Q o a °w« •O �^.O LA o o :Ua m c U > u O E O u O O �' C ° OO ° a E EC O_ LEo O Y Y bO O_ Z t4 O d OC i� ° Y O L Q E "O O J Y w c C U O F U 0 O a 7 • C `t O_ r oN G 3 O° O a V 41 ° c r L Z C L O A A .>> w O c U N E w A U F O O C J O C d _ L v w d N L 4 J O U O M Y_ O d0 01 m w 3 N w Q V O a L> O YO Q p .= b C p° C N O) y O T 0 C C M L d N C N° U M N Y a G W 0! 01 y U b= U a J a 'j d Y ✓ a s ° o L ° c co O 0 0 0° a a, U '� r c E v m 0£ c — F E v$ Q Y U U L 3 a— U u c c 0' Q Q o Q b 0 F °u °u d� °u a N 2 F NO _ c 0 v w t A y d O L L O ° ' M.F.0CO YLdU YdAc U °bC bLcAQ .£H> YMNCCA CQCO OA m A U v0 U A U OL, O 'M /b Lv , CA L O °O tL O w u0 p a rLE33w0ivOAadLa u E uLL a 60 0 I ao c 0 a w oG -o c ao c 0 0 N_ 0 O F 0 O b4 2 A E « a V N C V O O ON S O L U O a0 j .r b tad "' a C a �'' U L w A Q a y F a o C m v v 2° E A v A N A v w v Y C s V V E a Y U- R u ,o Y` C N o m N Y a 0 a o O 3 N L O A VI W p w JT O.a d> C O a A Lw a p s C >• at LMJ mE �O- C a O! dmLO ,Od 'Vt U LdJ = 0 0 O OLL O C3C dN 0 E V= p E mQC v I w O E OM O O m v c u U a •� O �; U v v u L c v v y Q c U d A N v 3£ Q • F Z v' E id L a a0 a dAq m .o O O c v c a o a N_ v- C ;; o -d U :� o b o es v° `- °� r b- $ a i ° c i 0 p E O m Yj O i C M V C J auo C V C U v C =Q J O Y Q V �° A !� v Gp b v all O S O! O C1vt L C O Y C O ty C A a 0 w $.o v j O a m U e4v CL N U C S- J 3 U 3 u a C O. N E M L M U A AO d N N L L N a� VI O Z O L V t 60 0 CL ao c 0 a w Cc! -o c ao c 0 0 N_ 0 O F 0 O b4 2 L t U N � m 0 p 2 C3 o a)U aU c � gQ 0 a m J J _« o c o — v 0 c E o p Q o v u v U ro o '> > c '�rav v p v 'ca > u U u .O O a w N p> E p M S o; 0 U ro MM m A dco W 4 SU CC L O Y v O E o p u A U 0 T v s d Em O v c o O O O E N ;a C v cc c o E w- N v o o Y, o u v .� u', - ro NU w p w m, v c aC0 a, o ro ro w 0'5; r w u a'o =F- 0u uo� u v c ro • wfl a o M a c 3 o Q E p o v F v m b _ c v `—�° T o v .0 w d v v d v v L o> U o N v 'r+ pu c -r O ,v+ U u o ou i N m N N N "O a O b R a U U M M U U N U M L t U N � m 0 p 2 C3 o a)U aU c � gQ 0 a m J J STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF ORANGE } $s. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH } 1, Leilani I. Brown, City Clerk of the City of Newport Beach, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council is seven; that the foregoing resolution, being Resolution No. 2013-76 was duly and regularly introduced before and adopted by the City Council of said City at a regular meeting of said Council, duly and regularly held on the 12`x' day of November, 2013, and that the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Gardner, Petros, Hill, Selich, Henn, Daigle, Mayor Curry Nays: None IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the official seal of said City this 13'x' day of November, 2013. am4m�-�- City Clerk Newport Beach, California (Seal)