Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSS04 - Tidelands AdministrationITEM 4 TO: Members of the Newport Beach City Council FROM: Homer Bludau, City Manager SUBJECT: Tidelands Administration RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and File. EXECUTIVE In January 1999, the City Council identified "Improved Tidelands SUMMARY: Administration' as one of its goals for 1999. The Council had asked City staff to examine the way that it administers the City's tidelands properties and to report back with suggestions for more streamlined administration. The Council focused upon the "equity' of rents and valuations throughout the Harbor and upon the manner in which the City itself staffs tidelands- related activities. We have addressed these two issues as follows: • Equity. In late September, we issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) on a comprehensive appraisal of the City's tidelands assets. The City received three responses to this RFP on October 21, 1999. • Administration. Staff has also worked on streamlining the City's administration of tidelands activities -from meeting attendance to which division handles lease negotiations. Two organization charts -one outlining how things work today and another outlining how things might work in the future -are attached. This agenda item gives the City Council an opportunity to review and comment about a proposed organizational structure for tidelands administration. BACKGROUND: Several individuals in several different City departments have specific responsibility over Newport Bay - related activities. While this can be somewhat confusing for City staff to administer, it is even more confusing for residents who need a permit processed, a question answered, or a lease negotiated. For example: • Fire and Marine approves plans and specifications for residential piers - something that Building may have more expertise in. Newport Beach City Council Page 2 BACKGROUND: • Public Works administers the City's NPDES program, even though (cont'd) stormwater and urban runoff issues come up at a variety of meetings that the Deputy City Manager attends. • Fire and Marine and the Deputy City Manager both negotiate and manage specific tidelands leases. • Dredging issues float between Fire and Marine and the Deputy City Manager, depending upon the specific dredging location in the Bay. • Environmental issues -like eelgrass mitigation and the current Studies underway by the US Army Corps of Engineers -also are administered by either the Deputy City Manager, Public Works, or Fire and Marine. Recognizing this problem, we reviewed what we do now (Attachment A) and tried to project what we should be doing in the future (Attachment B). If implemented, the changes proposed by these attachments (shown in the form of organization charts) would align various categories of activities under specific departments. In short, the changes would: • Align most environmental programs, including the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES) responsibility, under the Deputy City Manager. • Bring plan review and permitting under the Building Department. • Create a distinction between lease negotiation and lease enforcement - leaving the latter with Fire and Marine and the former with the Deputy City Manager. • Direct Fire and Marine to review and enforce lease conditions at least annually instead of by complaint only. • Assume a small realignment of mooring administration and ownership from the County of Orange to Fire and Marine. In preparation for this Study Session item, I have reviewed these charts and ask that the City Council also review them before I take any action towards implementation. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A - Current Structure Attachment B - Proposed Structure � k | a « � / 0 � §§ j/ mE k® § � � � � | m §§ §§ k ( tn § § � � k _ } (/ \ // (2§ \\( ` K � / \ §� ) -` § N §k du k ) % Q � LA � � ■ E e � ca E 4c � � § § ( a B 2 §�§ } }\ / � 0 £] /\ §§ B b k q \� #) k2)ig kt)({ )22)% �) ®■2 k { /() §� kQ § u �I §] 22 k \! §§ § z \k )§ � f �`