Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19 - AWG-CJE Funding RequestMarch 13, 2001 Agenda Item No. 19 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Office of the City Manager TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Homer Bludau RE: AWG /CJE Funding Request DATE: March 13, 2001 The City has received a request from AWG and WE for a grant to fund an El Toro public information and outreach program (Program). A copy of the Program is attached to this memo. The Chair of the Airport Issues Committee will make an oral recommendation regarding this funding request. homer BI au City Manager 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Goals Objectives and Strategy Overview Messages and Themes Direct Communications Budget Analysis of S. County Expenditures El Toro Public Information and Outreach Prepared by AWG and CJE Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 5 Page 7 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 INTRODUCTION This outreach proposal regarding commercial aviation reuse at MCAS El Toro has been jointly prepared by David Ellis representing AWG and Bruce Nestande representing CJE. The intent of this request is to "re -start" the public information program following Judge Otero's ruling invalidating Measure F. This project, using public funds, will be exclusively directed at public education and information per the guidelines with which we have previously complied. Through the Public Records Act, we have determined that South County (Irvine + ETRPA) spent $15 million for FY 00/01. Of this, $9.0 million is earmarked for public relations, direct mail, cable television, coalition building and press relations. The balance, $6 million is used for consultants, lawyers and staff. We have less than a year to educate the community on the need for additional aviation capacity in Orange County. The nationwide aviation capacity crisis underscores the need for El Toro Airport. We will capitalize upon this situation -- in addition to correcting the record -- with a community outreach program. El Toro Public Information and Outreach Prepared by AWG and CJE 2 GOALS Reestablish the need for El Toro Airport and credibility of the planning process in all levels of the community in preparation for the certification of DEIR 573. ➢ Elected officials Outreach. We must start from ground zero with elected officials — at all levels — to dispel the myths that South County's onslaught of money have perpetuated. Opinion Leader Outreach. Through regular mailings, blast e- mails, and briefing meetings we will make opinion leaders aware of the need for additional aviation capacity in Orange County. ➢ Monitor and Assist Legislative Agenda in Sacramento and Washington. The national aviation crisis has created an environment that is potentially conducive to a legislative resolution to the issue. ➢ Business and Labor Communitv Outreach. All the major business, labor and community organizations in Orange County must be solicited for support. Regular communications are essential to keep these organizations focused on the need for additional airport capacity. ➢ Grass Roots Organization. Using existing organizations as the entry point to each community, a grass roots operation outside Newport-Mesa should be formalized. ➢ Retail Public Information Campaign. Using multiple media tools, generate a coordinated campaign of cable television, direct mail, web - sites, house -file mailings to recapture public opinion. ➢ Studies and Opinion Research. Determine key issues through polling and conduct an analysis of the fiscal impacts of non - aviation proposals. Assimilating this information will serve as a foundation for our public information program. El Toro Public Information and Outreach Prepared by AWG and CJE OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGY The public debate over the future of El Toro Airport is reaching the most critical stage. The next twelve months will determine the future use of El Toro. This issue has achieved a high degree of public awareness. Based on past surveys 94% of the voting public in Orange County has an opinion on El Toro, nearly two- thirds have a strong opinion, and the electorate vacillates on the issue. Press coverage of this issue can be influenced, but not controlled. The same is true of the numerous public and private studies, reports and other information that continue to fuel the public debate. The primary objective of the El Toro Airport Public Education and Information . Campaign should be to produce and distribute high quality, informative, persuasive communications to the most politically active citizens in the county. The group selected to receive this information must be large enough to result in a majority favorably viewing commercial aviation as the ultimate reuse of El Toro. With that simple proposition in mind, here are the objectives of our proposal: 1) Mobilize public opinion so that a majority can be counted on to defeat any proposal that would derail the El Toro re -use process. 2) Provide sufficient public and political support to enable the pro- airport majority on the Board of Supervisors to stay the course on El Toro. 3) Educate the public on the need for El Toro Airport and the limitations of John Wayne Airport. 4) Demonstrate the economic and environmental risks to the county that will result from failure to provide a modern, self- contained system of air transportation. 5) Undermine the fear campaign of airport opponents by bringing the facts about noise, traffic, flight patterns, property values and environmental impacts to South County residents. 6) Explain the significance of the 18,000 acre "no home zone" in protecting surrounding communities from adverse impacts. IF- El Toro Public Information and Outreach Prepared by AWG and CJE 7) Provide a vision of El Toro as a well planned, community friendly, environmentally sound airport as modeled after John Wayne Airport. It is important that citizens identify with JWA as a template for a future airport at El Toro. 8) Prove that the Millennium Plan and the Great Park are economically unsound and will cost the taxpayers money. 9) Monitor progress toward meeting these objectives with an ongoing program of public opinion research. Strategy We will coordinate the combined resources of the public agencies and private organizations that support a commercial airport at El Toro into a mass communications campaign designed to meet the above objectives. The campaign will primarily use direct mail, but will also utilize press relations, a public information video, brochures and presentations to community organizations. The public information plan being proposed is essentially a communications strategy that resulted in the pro- airport side to winning two countywide elections on the specific issue of commercial aviation reuse at El Toro. El Toro Public Information and Outreach Prepared by AWG and CJE 5 OVERVIEW Newport Beach is obviously most impacted by JWA and its potential expansion if commercial aviation at El Toro does not occur. Clearly no other city will lead a comprehensive outreach program other than Newport Beach. Our extensive post election (Measure F) analysis indicated that approximately 2/3 of the yes on F vote was for reasons other than opposing El Toro Airport. That analysis allows us to conclude that Measure F was not a direct reflection of the El Toro issue at this time. In addition, our focus group analysis concluded that the basic arguments for commercial aviation reuse at El Toro remain viable as opposed to the Millennium or Great Park proposals. The success of the El Toro reuse plan has been placed in jeopardy by a well- organized and well - financed campaign of misinformation. The South County cities of Irvine, Laguna Hills, Lake Forest, Dana Point and Mission Viejo will spend an estimated fifteen million dollars annually on lobbyists, consultants and public communications designed to undermine the existing county reuse process and prevent the conversion of El Toro to commercial aviation use. In addition to this publicly financed campaign, South County anti - airport activists have mobilized and grown in number and strength. This group has proven its ability to place a repeal measure anti - airport initiative (Measure S) on the county ballot, the Measure F initiative, and is preparing for another initiative challenge in March 2002. Although many countywide business chambers and community organizations have endorsed the El Toro Airport in the past, this issue is not the highest priority for most of these groups and they have not been contacted in months. The same is true of most citizens who live outside of the area immediately surrounding El Toro. A majority of these citizens have voted for a commercial airport in two elections, yet they have very little emotional attachment to the issue and have been constantly inundated with misinformation for the past three years. News coverage of the El Toro issue increasingly reflects the imbalance by favoring the anti - airport position. Coverage in the Times and the Register partially reflects the fact that South County readers want to see a steady stream of anti - airport stories, while North County readers are ambivalent. A continuing, aggressive, and unanswered publicly funded anti - airport campaign will have the following impacts on the reuse process: El Toro Public Information and Outreach Prepared by AWG and CJE An Eroding and demoralizing of the pro- airport majority on the Board of Supervisors in addition to our city, community organizations, and voter support base; with the likely result being the repeal of Measure A. Newport Beach must step up and lead in order to counter the publicly funded misinformation campaign of airport opponents. The activities should include: Public Information and Education. Monthly Information Bulletins should be mailed countywide to give the public accurate information on a variety of issues including the need for El Toro Airport, economic benefits and jobs, tax revenue creation, realistic projections of take off and landing patterns, and economic impacts on property values. These communications should also critique the idea of non - aviation use of El Toro generally, and the Millennium Plan specifically. Public Opinion Research. Regular polling to measure public opinion on the El Toro issue. This information will be used to plan communications strategy and to present accurate information on public opinion to government officials. Community Outreach. Tailor the pro - airport message in an effective way to citizens, businesses, labor and public sector groups desiring additional El Toro information. This relationship will result in strengthening the existing pro - airport coalition. Media Relations. Giving the pro - airport side a loud and unified voice in the airport debate through a regular series of press briefings, news conferences, op- ed pieces and letters to the editor. El Toro Public Information and Outreach Prepared by AWG and CJE VA MESSAGES AND THEMES The El Toro Airport public information campaign should have a unifying theme with a series of messages to reinforce this theme. Most of the messages will be pro - airport. Others will be defensive, refuting misinformation circulated by opponents. Five years of polling and two successful election campaigns on this issue have given us a good idea of what this theme and some of the messages.will be. Obviously, messages will be modified based upon current information and trends. The general theme developed through the Measure A (and Measure S) campaign is: El Toro Airport ... We need it — demand is there. JWA is inadequate. El Toro is available -- at no cost to taxpayers. Messages that reinforce this theme are: 1) John Wayne Airport is inadequate to meet future transportation needs of the county. 2) The El Toro 16,000 acre no -home zone protects surrounding communities 3) El Toro Airport is necessary for the future economic development of Orange County, emphasizing international travel and tourism. 4) The airport will preserve future environmental quality of life throughout the county. ➢ Adequate air transportation in necessary to boost our economy based on "clean" industries, i.e. tourism, trade and high tech. ➢ A "self contained" Orange County protects the regional environment, reduces traffic and pollution. ➢ The airport plan is being developed in a community friendly, environmentally responsible way. ➢ The airport plan incorporates parks and open space. El Toro Public Information and Outreach Prepared by AWG and CJE ➢ In the next 20 years commutes to regional airports will be gridlocked. 5) Economic benefits of El Toro: ➢ Jobs ➢ Tax revenues to all cities ➢ Productivity gains, commute time reduction for Orange County workers ➢ Cargo operations resulting in time and cost savings to local businesses 6) A strong economy with a modern system of air transportation will have a positive effect on property valuation throughout Orange County. Messages that refute opposition claims include: 1) Realistic flight plans will not seriously impact surrounding communities, especially Irvine, Orange, Tustin, Villa Park, Anaheim Hills, Yorba Linda, Fullerton, San Clemente and San Juan Capistrano. 2) El Toro will be financed by landing fees, not taxes. 3) Requiring Orange County residents to travel to 'outside" airports, i.e. LAX, San Diego, etc., is economically absurd, environmentally irresponsible, and reasonable travel time will become unbearable. 4) "Alternate uses" proposed by airport opponents lack credibility. ➢ "Unfairness" of turning taxpayer funded airport over to private developers. ➢ Lack of federal government approval. ➢ Financing problems. ➢ Traffic and environmental impact of new housing development. ➢ The residential housing, retail, and commercial business centers can be built in other locations, an airport cannot. ➢ Toxic cleanup problems and costs will limit uses and options. ➢ "Opening up" of the 16,000 acre buffer zone for more residential and industrial development. El Toro Public Information and Outreach Prepared by AWG and CJE DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS In Orange County, direct communication has been proven to be the only efficient method of building voter support on issues of public concern. The Los Angeles metro broadcast market is simply too large to be used continuously on a cost - effective basis. And even the most aggressive press relations program will not be as effective in shaping public opinion as a well planned and executed direct communications campaign. Direct communications also has the advantage of interactivity. People can respond to appeals in a variety of ways. They can join an organization, they can participate in a poll, or they can send letters and petitions to government officials. Respondents to direct appeals constitute a list of activities that can then receive specialized communications requesting further action. These bulletins will not be campaign mailings and will not advocate a yes or no vote, but will be designed to counter the kind of misinformation on the El Toro issue that is often circulated in the heat of a campaign. The content of these communications will be driven by the public opinion research and the emergence of issues in the El Toro debate. Communications will be non - partisan and non - political in nature. The communication will be exclusively education and information. El Toro Public Information and Outreach Prepared by AWG and CJE =1 10 EL TORO AIRPORT PUBLIC INFORMATION AND EDUCATION BUDGET March 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001 Public Opinion Research Benchmark Poll $45,000 Tracking Poll $35,000 Opinion Leader Outreach Regular luncheons featuring political and academic experts on aviation and land use $50,000 issues. Business community outreach. $50,000 5 mailings to CEO's and OC business leaders. Direct Mail /External Communications One mass mailing monthly. (3/01 - 12/01) $2,500,000 Q = 500,000 households /mailing 5 million total pieces mailed Specialized newsletters and follow up to mass $150,000 mailing respondents (Appx.90,000) . Cable Television $510,000 Monthly 2 week flights 1,380 spots weekly on 12 cable franchises. $100,000 Production of 10 — 30 second spots. $100,000 Web Site Development and maintenance of web site. OCRAA Activities Fiscal analysis of non - aviation uses (est.) $50,000 Toxic remediation analysis (est.) $50,000 Elected officials outreach. Communicate bi- 50,000 monthly via "FYI" mail alerts. Blast e-mail and fax alerts as necessary. TOTAL: $3,690,000 El Toro Public Information and Prepared by AWG and CJE City of Irvine Contracts Regarding the MCAS El Toro FY 99100 1 /5/01 Saved as Dave Ellis Public Records Act -Irvine Company Contracted Contract Purpose Term Amount 1 Adam D. Probolsky & Assm 4/5/99- 6/30/99 $ 55,000.00 Development and Implementation of a public opinion poll Newport Beach, CA 2 Alvarado Smith & Sanchez 8130MM130100 $ 157,200.00 Provide legal counsel to the City of Irvine with regard to its efforts Irvine. CA on the closure and reuse of MICAS. El Tom. 3 Black & Veatch Corp. Expires 6130100 $ 40,000.00 Air quality and environmental noise Kansas City, MO assessment for the Millennium Plan Phase II 4 BV Engineenng 6/15/99-6130/00 $ 68,800.0,0 Millennium Plan 11 annexation Irvine, CA infrastructure. hydrology am act analysis 5 Caldwell Leslie Newcombe & Pettit 10127/99-6/30100 $ 50,000.00 Legal services regarding actions taken Los Angeles, CA by O.C. Land Use Commission 6 Cotton Beland Assoc. 6115/99. 6130100 $ 259,920.00 Millennium Plan II revised and EIR Pasadena, CA regarding annexation 7 David Evans & Assoc. Expires 12131199 $ 346,700.00 Preparation of EIR for the City general plan and zoning; Laguna Hills, CA and annexation of MICAS El Toro. 8 Deyoung & Assoc. 514199- 6130100 $ 100,000.00 Cable television production Dana Point. CA 9 Hillary Willett 4/10/99-6117/99 Nothing Assisting the Legal Affairs Committee Irvine, CA found at the city of Irvine 10 Hogan & Hartson $ 545,000.00 Washington DC advocacy for Legal Affairs Washington DC 11 Analysis Group $ 59,000.00 Professor Dennis Aigner, GSM. UCI Subcontractors of Hogan and Hartson Review of Counties Airport Financing Plan 12 National Aviation Research Institute $ 72,000.00 Review county consultant work regarding El Tom. Subcontractors of Hoqan and Hartson flight tracks and traffic flows 13 AEMS. LLC $ 100,000.00 Air quality analysis of El Tom Airport Subcontractors of Hogan and Hartson 14 BBN $ 78,000.00 Review noise element of the Dept. of Navy draft EIS February 2000 Subcontractors of Hogan and Hartson 15 Katz Hollis 811199-7/31100 $ 127,000.00 Redevelopment Agency - Activation Los An eles, CA and plan adoption. 16 Kosmont & Assoc. 811199-6130100 $ 6,500.00 Millennium Plan II fiscal impact analysis Los Angeles. CA 17 Loeb & Loeb 3123199- 8130199 $ 10.000.00 Legal research regarding the Dept. of Defense selection of the County Los Angeles, CA of Orange as the Local Redevelopment Authority for MICAS El Tom. 18 Marsha Levine 8124199-11124/99 Nothing Assisting the Legal Affairs Committee Irvine, CA found at the city of Irvine 19 Dr. Mary Schiavo 511199- 811/99 $ 7.025.34 Anti- airport speech Ohio State University and media availability 1 /5/01 Saved as Dave Ellis Public Records Act -Irvine City of Irvine Contracts Regarding the MCAS El Toro FY 99100 20 Company Contracted Contract Purpose Term Amount 21 Michael Brown and Assoc. 7/27/9941130100 $ 87,500.00 Environmental analysis & coordination regarding Santa Barbara, CA El Toro toxic clean-up. 22 Mike Roos & Co. 1119/99-819100 $ 180,000.00 Provide assistance in the identification & acquisition of funds related Los Angeles, CA to the development of a suburban Park at MCAS El Toro. 23 MNA Consulting 10128198 - 6/30/00 $ 57,750.00 Development and implementation of annexation strategy. San Diego, CA 24 Nossaman, Guthner, Knox & Elliott 2111/00 -6/30/01 S 150.000.00 Perform legal work to assist Irvine in its annexation Sacramento. LA, Irvine of former MCAS El Toro. 25 Pawns Bahia & Latimer 619/99-6/30/00 S 177,239.81 Legal assistance in developing a legal framework and strategy Salt Lake atV. UT in connection with the contamination of MCAS El Tom 26 Peter Zeughauser 4/27199 - 6/30100 S 186.000.00 El Tom Conversion Project Newport Beach, CA 27 PES Environmental Inc. 3/23/99- 3130/00 $ 222.500.00 Base cleanup issues Santa Ana, CA 28 RKJK & Assoc. 6 /1 519 9-6 /3 0/0 0 S 153,260.00 Millennium Plan II Traffic Impact analysis Newport Beach, CA response to comments annexation committee 29 Robert B. Irani 8/24199-1 1/2 4/99 Nothing Assisting the Legal Affairs Committee Irvine. CA found at the city of Irvine 30 TAMS Consultants 10/l/98-12131199 S 25,000.00 Assist in evaluating the impacts of the Chicago, IL civilian flight testing at MCAS ET Tom. 31 Visual Design Solutions 5111/99-6130100 S 49,495.00 Computer aided land planning for El Toro Santa Monica, CA 32 Watson & Co. 7/14/98- 6/30199 $ 50,000.00 Explore the long tern feasibility of a new regional San Diego, CA airport site in the County. 33 Woodward & McDowell 5111/99 -6/30 /00 S 185.000.00 Provide community outreach activities Burlingame, CA I Focus gmup research and polling. 34 Force & Mollrich FY 0001 $ 4.521,000.00 Direct mail, televsion, web sites Newport Beach. CA 35 Ccontz & Matthews. LLP 3123/99- 12/30/99 S 137,500.00 Planning, managing and Dominating all legal efforts to prevent the San Juan Capistrano. CA conversion of MCAS El Toro into a commercial airport. 35 Chambers Group 8/1199. 6/30100 S 23,500.00 Provided biological consulting services and prepare responses Irvine, CA to comment on the draft program for the millennium plan II. 37 Kathleen Graves a/24199-11/24199 Notiung Assisting the Legal Affairs Committee Irvine. CA found at the city of Irvine Total: I S BT87,890.15 115/01 Saved as: Dave MILS Public Records Ad-Irvine § w w 2 Q � k d k � $ f � « a 2 w w � � LL | LY | ) | ) 2 \� §§e 12 r�$ 0E k) o }§ 2 )\E!! | »f�( - _ { - E _ . k / \ k § \ \\(( ))� A! z ] « \\ m\ « �a a \ \ �0 E ■ 0 0 0§ ! � ®(�jk\ U) {§ U) ( §_% e -6 k ) # { / / -)�) kkk: \ - \ f■ 0 . | LY | ) | ) 3 -13 -201 5:03PM FROM p 2 KA FAA Airport Working Group of Orange County, lnc. March 13, 2001 Mayor Gary Adams City of Newport Beach VIA FACSIMILE 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, CA 92663 Dear Mayor Adams, The purpose of this letter is to clarify our correspondence of March 12, 2001. The Airport Working Group of Orange County, Inc. (AWG) is in total accord with the terms, conditions, and time line being negotiated between the City of Newport Beach and the County of Orange regarding the extension of the JWA Settlement Agreement. Our position is conditional upon the City of Newport Beach actively pursuing commercial aviation at MCAS, El Toro because we believe: 1. Orange County needs additional commercial aviation capacity, 2. El Toro is the only site that offers the ultimate protection to the residents of Newport Beach so that JWA will not.inherit the entire long -term commercial aviation demand for Orange County. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, XOWI A01 , Tom Naughton Barbara Lichman President Executive Director 1048 Irvine Avenue • PMB 467 • Newport Beach • California • 92660 - (949) 224 5504 MAR -13 -2001 17:Ar, on.. A I CGtizerfs for Jobs 8c tFve EcormomyI d . \on -pr „fir tarp or ari�rr March 13, 2001 Members, City Council City of Newport Beach Citizens for Jobs & the Economy (CJ &E) is in total accord with the terms, conditions, and time line being negotiated between the City of Newport Beach and the County of Orange regarding extension of the John Wayne Airport (JWA) Settlement Agreement. Our position is conditional upon the City of Newport Beach actively pursuing commercial aviation at MCASET because we believe that (1) Orange County needs additional commercial aviation capacity, and (2) El Toro is the only site that offers the ultimate protection to the residents of Newport Beach so that JWA will not solely inherit the entire long term commercial aviation demand for Orange County. If there are any questions or comments regarding our position, please give us a call. Sincerely, Bruce Nestande President & CEO, CJ &E George L. Argyros Chairman, CJ &E 949 So re th Coast Orire. Suite #600 • Costa Mesa. CA 92 62 6 ( 7 1 4 ) 451 -5074 Fax (714) 451 -.5069 q 1 March 6, 2001 Board of Supervisors Meetine Subject: Support of the $5 Million public outreach program through OCRAA for the El Toro Airport. Agenda Item # 40. The Orange County Airport Working Group supports the expenditure of funds from the John Wayne Airport revenue source to provide factual information as to the need for the El Toro Airport. This is long overdue. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) recognized the need for the El Toro airport in their regional analysis and recommendation presented last Thursday. LAX handled 67,606,831 passengers last year. This was a 5.2% increase over the 64,279,571 passengers in 1999 or an increase of 3,327,260 passengers in just one year. At this rate LAX will reach its capacity limit of 78 MAP in less than 3 years. Increase in pass. /vear • 1998 61,215,712 pass. (actual) baseline • 1999 64,279,571 pass. (actual, increase of 5.0 %) 3,063,859 (actual) • 2000 67,606,861 pass. (actual, increase of 5.2%) 3,327,260 (actual) • 2001 70,987,172 pass. (est. at 5 %) 3,380,343 (est.) • 2002 74,536,530 pass. (est. at 5 %) 3,549,358 (est.) • 2003 78,263,356 pass. (est. at 5 %) 3,726,826 (est.) Note: LAX today is carrying 77% of the passenger demand in the SCAG region. The cost to increase LAX capacity from 78 MAP to 89 MAP, a 11 MAP increase, is 12 Billion dollars. As you can see from above, LAX has been handling the bulk of the passenger demand in the SCAG region. If LAX holds to their current capacity of 78 MAP, other airports in the region are going to have to absorb the increase demand in three years or you will restrict capacity. Restrict capacity and you will increase cost to the user similar to the current energy crisis. Only this time you will be working with a true deregulated airline system that knows how to adapt their price structure to a limited capacity. Why El Toro and John Wayne airports are needed in the regional plan must be shown from the factual information available. Tom Naughton President O.C. Airport Working Group