The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About14 - Proposed City Hall - Parking Garage - Fire StationCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No. 14 August 23, 2005 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Office of the City Manager Homer L. Bludau, City Manager 949 - 644 -3000, hbludau @city.newport - beach.ca.us SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL REVIEW AND DIRECTION TO CONSULTANTS ON CURRENT PLANNING STATUS OF PROPOSED CITY HALL STRUCTURE AND GROUNDS, PARKING GARAGE AND FIRE STATION The Building Committee (Mayor Heffernan and Council Member Ridgeway present, Council Member Webb absent) met Wednesday afternoon with the Griffin and LPA consultants to review progress status and hear of input obtained since the last City Council meeting. Direction was provided from this and the last meeting (Council Members Webb and Ridgeway present, Mayor Heffernan absent) to cause some Committee proposed changes to the site layout. By the end of the meeting, the Committee recommended the following actions for Council's consideration: 1. Provide direction to the architect to increase the City Hall's building program from 68,000 sq. ft. to 74,000 sq. ft. 2. Adopt the new site plan configuration presented which alters the site locations for the fire station and the parking garage. 3. Adopt changes to the OC Fire Authority building standards for the fire station which would require more durable, longer lasting building materials. (Cost implications - $360,000) 4. Add glass wall at rear of Council chambers facing courtyard (could allow for future Council chambers expansion at no current cost to do so). 5. Agree to Council chambers layout as presented, including configuration of Council and staff spatial relationship. 6. Agree to provide structurally for future up to 8,000 sq. ft. expansion of City Hall. (Do not build at this time.) Council Review & Direction to Consultants on Current Planning Status of Proposed City Hall Structure & Grounds, Parking Garage and Fire Station August 23, 2005 Page 2 7. Agree to all City Hall fagade /design enhancements as presented. 8. Agree to revised budget estimates to accommodate all the above items. (To be provided at meeting.) Submitted by: Homer L. Bludau City Manager CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No. 14 August 23, 2005 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Office of the City Manager Homer L. Bludau, City Manager 949 - 644 -3000, hbludau @city.newport - beach.ca.us SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL REVIEW AND DIRECTION TO CONSULTANTS ON CURRENT PLANNING STATUS OF PROPOSED CITY HALL STRUCTURE AND GROUNDS, PARKING GARAGE AND FIRE STATION ISSUE: What feedback does the City Council want to provide to City staff and our consultants regarding the current plans for the proposed fire station, parking garage and city hall structures? Is the City Council ready to decide what "adds" it would like to include to the city hall structure so that schematics can proceed? RECOMMENDATION: Listen to the consultants' presentations and provide input and direction to City staff and the consultants regarding planning decisions needed to be made in order for the schematic process to continue. STATUS: During the last meeting, the City Council heard a presentation on the planning status of the proposed city hall structure. This meeting will continue that discussion, but add the parking garage and fire station components to the discussion. A cost magnitude of the project will also be provided. The site layout, adjacencies, and site relationships will be covered. The City Manager and consultants met with the Council members who are not part of the Council Building Committee in order to obtain input. Feedback from those meetings will be incorporated into the consultants' presentations. During the last meeting, the City Council did not feel comfortable in making a decision regarding the city hall "adds" that had been developed by the consultants at the request of the Building Committee members. That discussion can continue this evening. No Council Review & Direction to Consultants on Current Planning Status of Proposed City Hall Structure & Grounds, Parking Garage and Fire Station August 23, 2005 Page 2 square footage has been added to the proposed project based on discussions with the City Council members. This is an opportunity for the City Council and the public to provide feedback that results in a project defined to the point that schematics can proceed and our Local Coastal Permit application can be made. The project needs to be defined so that cost estimates can be obtained and funding options can be fully detailed to the City Council at its September 13th meeting. Submitted by: Homer L. Bludau City Manager What Will this Presentation Cover? Background /Process Site Plan Options �- Fire Station Parking Structure -� City Hall Design Options Conceptual Costs -# 6q - a BACKGROUND t May 10 Council Approval to Proceed with Concept Design Council Working Sessions Town Hall Meetings Council Input 131-Weekly Building Committee Meetings Maya He man/ Mayor PM Tan We G Mllman Rltlpeway — August 9 Conceptual Review August 23 Conceptual Review is I 'r E P L A t%' e Fire Station/ Parking Structure 0 N — is Q Apparatus Says ..:. .Dorm_ Fire Station 5 Revised Site — Parkt \St =1NLEY AVE ❑ I ® L 3M STREET �Y 359 Stalls —r (5 on -site stalls) n. LI What Determines Building Configuration? Site Configuration Sustainability OL U D Sunlight/ Prevailing Breezes/ Landscape -�= Internal Functions Community/ Public Spaces , Development 7 Aesthetic FUNCTION Form Follows Function The Internal Functions Define Building Shape —SUSTAINABILITY _, Openings L E E D to Materials Sun Protection Building Configuration 6 Solar Power Capabilities — NEWPORT BEACH A Building That Reflects The "Uniqueness" Of Newport Beach % 32ND STREET Options E Aesthetic NEWPORT BEACH 0 qr. City Hall Vim From 321^ Street Base Option M City Hall Vedd From limped Boulevard North Light Base Option 10 11 DESIGN OPTIONS a Firs #obi? eAq Chambers iVA vcwpun Beach Civic C'entei Fireo4l 2cil C'harnbersl Revised Expansion Option 8, 000 SF L 3,WR SF FTUj J j� II L I4 13 ➢¢nrurl lnnrzeiry (3l) � HrnnA2nsr P.wnr �° � i ern >rr•Irmorr 1 Ill _ 1 � 1 � I i 1 � ' 1 � o Fireo4l 2cil C'harnbersl Revised Expansion Option 8, 000 SF L 3,WR SF FTUj J j� II L I4 13 pmFIN L4 AVE r� i2N. sRrI Form Options `El! City Hall View From NewpoN Boulevard Option Comparisons 15 Conceptual Budget Estimates {, Oily Hall Comparisons And Options Daecopt. OpOOn3 M,eo010 Clry Hell Fulure Omll AEEI000Ol AMItlonol R6gIHeE (wH Amin. mewl 72,0005E FegaEeB Expanalo ReAot. o n 3MSF SMOSF Total Aal —aly l Proram Ow OPUM Opllon b1.$ Increase SWnOar 5ysbms onma, M.ile,& m ow nMMlanw 2asg0o0 0 0 0 0 0 o z,a5a,o0o city Hall I Community RM1 19,687,000 1,180,000 2,66$000 702,000 0 968,000 1,613,000 26,x22,000 COuncIICNmaem City Hall FF &E 1.512.000 66,600 0 0 0 66.OW 110,050 1,774,000 Pllowanw Parking Structure 4,604,000 28,000 0 IKOW 0 0 0 4,780,000 (A Pros, S505talle Fire Sletion Mlh &E FF MI.... 3�H]$,0. 0 SE0,000. 0 0 0' 0 4,235,000 Interim MW Hall 1500,.0 0 0 0 - 1.500,000 0 0 0 Relowtloa Allow, TOTAL Direct W,fffi3OW 1J 000 3,022,000 882,000 -1,S .M 1,014,0Po 1,MON 40,106,000 Coets InElrect Code nT,w��ae vw 7A34,PoO 4sx,0Po HW.000 193.000 .iT1p0o 233.000 38sA00 s.602,000 coxrarl TOTAL M }18.000 1,784,000 3,708,M0 1,044000 4,57 ;000 1, .WO 2,112,000 9.787.000 Runnln9Tatal 43,300,000 17,.5,000 M,OSO,OW 46 }T6,OW 47.018,000 49,]6],000 DECISIONS Recommendations from Building Committee for Council Decisions. 16 Recommendations from Building Committee and individual Council Members to Council for decisions. Increase City Hall Building Program From 68,100 SF to 72,000 SF (Atltl: $1,784,000) � Adopt revised site plan configuration (Nichols) as presented this evening. (Add: $0) Adopt City Of Newport Beach Fire station (Chief Riley) Standards as opposed to OCFA (Atltl: $450,000) � Add glass wall at rear of council chambers with potential for outdoor seating (now) or future expansion of space (later) (Nichols and Rosansky) (Add: $]10,000) Agree to revised Council Chambers configuration as presented this evening. (Daigle) (Add: $0) � Agree to "Building Committee's Recommendation" to provide structural capability for future expansion of City Hall (8,000 SF) as well as related parking structure future expansi capability, but not actually construct the additional space or parking at this time. (Add: $1,045,000) Agree to "Building Committees Recommendation" forall City Hall facade/ design enhancement options as presented this evening. (Add: 52,945,000) � Agree to revised budget estimates to accommodate the above options. (Building Committee recommendations) For further review and consideration: Building color and material options for City Hall and related structures. Receiving area off Finley. (Duda Company) 1W Newport Beach Standards/ Fire Station € ' QCF.A Standards Cnlnppnew NswpuN Saach STANDARD OCFASTANOMD PerimaUrWeli Stiuctum conemC Mxonry Unto, Wootl Framing InfBtlor Well PaNllons Mntal Stu& Woud Fmming Lobby FlOOr Flnlfi 18msso Cuarty The Public Reftroom Flom Flnleb Tarrerzo Ceramic Tlk Dl— KitcM1en Floor Finish Tertasso Linakum DorM Res[room Floor FinlN Tmrazxo Carer le Al Bay antl 5M1op Floor FinlsM1 Ep,,, Coatlng Doer COna Salved Broom Finish ConRto V ,k-0t Wall El lWnil Caret Wainscot ROWd No VAlnscot Dorm Resttoems Wainscot Solid Surfacing Carar Tge T -mr S. Rey Doors Steal l3l (From) Sectional Rolloup(back) $aebor I Roll Up Frontantl Bad glchan Cabinele SuKul PM1enolic VAC Custom Gro" Plartic L.M.. Faw Janitor Pntl Bacon SM1ebinB Solid Plum -lic WIC Custom Gatlal Pleftic tamin F Rezlroom Cabinets Said Phl WIC Custom Gradal Plaetic LaminaN Face 18 Newport Beach Standards/ OCFA Standards Component Newport Beach STANDARD Fire Station OCFA STANDARD A. City Hall I Community Room I HVAC PacMagc Unllsan Raul! Split sy.. split Syebm (Approved By City Council) R.0 Freming Sail Tau V BSemy Metal DUCk Wood Tws6s /Fnminy Prywwtl $1,794,000 ApgoWl, M., Uralnln, . Trench Dmins Area Dnlm $2,940,000 Ap"mitus Exluusl(CMiethon None lVeMClee Have Mi.) Pymownt System All SpWm Mist Net OC SIienR Designed Roof Insulation mSld ash $34,822,000 Total Ada: $450,000.00 Conceptual Budget Estimates ?_ City Hall With Options A. City Hall I Community Room I New Council Chambers Site work I Indirect Costs $29,053,000 LEED Commissioning (Approved By City Council) B. Add: Program Increase $1,794,000 68,000 GSF To 72,000 GSF C. Add: $2,940,000 Facade Enhancements D. Add: Structural Capability $1,045,000 For Building Expansion Option (Building And Parking Structure) TOTAL A, B, c, D (Abovel: $34,822,000 19 Public Works Planning Building 4% r / 0 r rs� -- ---- Tl�! FIre Admin One Stop Admin Services, Reereedon I I Y 'Lf I i -• t. t n � Lobbyi� Very I 1 First Level ICommuni Public Works Fire Admin L I H G I I Admin Srvcs -I- Code Ent _ -- Human Resources y' Attorney I�`;: _s I I ❑G Mayor /Council I mL A Clerk City Manager Lunch Second Level 9q What's Next? — September 9: Council Tours Of Recently Completed City Hall In Omnge County. September 13: Council Presentation and Discussion Financing GMP/ Program Management Delivery Method and Related Contract Agreement With Duda Company (Summary Terms) — September 20: Tour Of NGBC (LEED) Facility In Santa Monica October 11 : Council Presentation Financing Authorization Duda Company Agreement and Land Exchange Review and Acceptance Of Revised ALTA Survey Program Management Agreement and Contractor Pre - Qualification 21 C a -N'�IL kUN A Ir0. 14 0/601&57 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No. 14 August 9, 2005 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Office of the City Manager Homer L. Bludau, City Manager 949 - 644 -3000, hbludau @city.newport- beach.ca.us SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL REVIEW AND DIRECTION TO CONSULTANTS ON CURRENT PLANNING STATUS OF PROPOSED CITY HALL STRUCTURE AND GROUNDS ISSUE: What does the City Council and the public think of the space allocation planning, elevations, and the various elements of the proposed City Hall project? RECOMMENDATION: Provide comments and direction to the project consultants regarding the proposed City Hall structure, space allocations, features, elevations, LEED certification, size, and any other issues pertaining to the project. PROJECT BACKGROUND: Based on the result of a space needs assessment study prepared by Griffin Structures, Inc. in 2001, Council approved a PSA with Griffin Structures Incorporated (Griffin) at a cost not to exceed $578,185 for project administration and management; and A/E design services through the completion of schematic design. In addition to the approval of the PSA, staff was directed to: engage in discussions with the adjacent property owner of Via Lido Plaza Center regarding a potential lot line adjustment. Staff was also directed to schedule a series of community workshops to receive input regarding planning and design of the project. On February 8, 2005, the City Council approved moving forward with the schematic design process and lot line adjustment discussions with the adjacent property owner. As a condition, Griffin was charged with investigating the question of whether or not to remodel or replace the existing buildings at City Hall. Council Member Webb had expressed the desire to keep as many existing buildings as were economically sound as Council Review & Direction to Consultants on Current Planning Status of Proposed City Hall Structure & Grounds August 9, 2005 Page 2 a part of the project. Staff and Griffin were also directed to conduct public outreach workshops to gather input on the schematic design for any new or remodeled facilities. Public workshops were held in conjunction with the architect, LPA, to gather opinions on design elements, priorities for a new City Hall campus, and 3 remodel scenarios developed with the assistance of Council Member Webb. Each of these scenarios presented a different combination of new and existing buildings. Department adjacencies were then developed for each option and construction cost estimates for the City Hall portion of the project were developed. These estimates include substructure, superstructure, interiors, MEP (plumbing, HVAC, and electrical), contingency funds, and an additive option to replace the Council Chambers. The following three options were then presented: The City Council selected Option 3 as the most efficient solution, and recommended the replacement of the Council Chambers and inclusion of the community center. Council approved proceeding with the proposed Option 3 including replacement of the Council Chambers, LEED certification, and a 350 -stall parking structure. The preliminary estimated cost for the project including relocation costs and anticipated indirect costs was $41,516,000. At that same meeting, Council approved the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding with Lido Partners, Inc. for the conditional approval of a lot -line adjustment. The one for one exchange of 0.33 acres will provide a more regular shape for a more efficient layout of the City Hall campus providing adequate space for a modern fire station, parking structure, and a new City Hall while preserving the existing green space along Newport Boulevard. ANALYSIS: Planning on the City Hall project is proceeding with regular meetings involving the City Council's Building Committee and staff members, and with the intent of making a comprehensive project presentation, including a firm cost estimate, to the City Council for a final project and funding vote on October 11th. Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Existing Space 29,440 s.f. 12,222 s.f. 3,622s . f. New Space 40,782 s.f. 56,000 s.f. 63,600 s.f. Total Space 70,222 s.f. 68,222 s.f. 67,222 s.f. Cost Estimate $23,670,000 $22,215,000 $19,180,000 Chamber Addition $550,000 $550,000 $550,000 Total Cost $24,220,000 $22,765,000 $19,730,000 The City Council selected Option 3 as the most efficient solution, and recommended the replacement of the Council Chambers and inclusion of the community center. Council approved proceeding with the proposed Option 3 including replacement of the Council Chambers, LEED certification, and a 350 -stall parking structure. The preliminary estimated cost for the project including relocation costs and anticipated indirect costs was $41,516,000. At that same meeting, Council approved the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding with Lido Partners, Inc. for the conditional approval of a lot -line adjustment. The one for one exchange of 0.33 acres will provide a more regular shape for a more efficient layout of the City Hall campus providing adequate space for a modern fire station, parking structure, and a new City Hall while preserving the existing green space along Newport Boulevard. ANALYSIS: Planning on the City Hall project is proceeding with regular meetings involving the City Council's Building Committee and staff members, and with the intent of making a comprehensive project presentation, including a firm cost estimate, to the City Council for a final project and funding vote on October 11th. Council Review & Direction to Consultants on Current Planning Status of Proposed City Hall Structure & Grounds August 9, 2005 Page 3 While the Council Building Committee (Mayor Heffernan, Council Members Ridgeway & Webb [used to be Bromberg]) regularly review the consultants' work being performed, the rest of the City Council and the public have not had this opportunity. The City Manager thinks it is the appropriate time for a thorough public status report on City Hall planning in order to provide Council and the public the opportunity for input and changes, before the schematics are too far along in development. Please remember, that the plan is to have schematics 20% finished in order to develop a firm cost estimate for the City Council to have in deciding the future of this proposed project. After today's meeting, the City Manager intends td schedule a follow up report from the consultant and architect on your August 23 meeting, in order to provide responses to issues which might have been raised during this Council meeting. Then, his intent is to provide City Council and the public a status report on the September 13th agenda from the project's financing team regarding how the City Hall, parking garage and fire station project would be financed and associated financing issues. All of this is with the intent to involve the whole City Council and the public in the process so a final vote can be scheduled on October 11th as to whether to commit to the project with the preparation of the final building plans. The Building Committee has served the function of overseeing the consultant and staff planning work, making sure that the planning process is well thought out and that both space and design decisions are made which best serve cost efficiency and the function the City Hall is intended to serve. The process is intended to have the Building Committee represent the Council in the basic planning so a final project can be brought before Council for a final vote. That means that the Committee has made decisions so the detail of the project can be brought forward for both Council and the public's review. While that process is working well, it is time to get feedback and direction from the complete City Council so if any changes are made which could have cost implications, those changes can be factored into the project's cost estimate which will be provided at the October 11th meeting. Among the numerous issues the consultants have worked on are the following: site soils reports; utility locations; LEED certification requirements; making the front green space more usable for public events; energy conservation measures; space adjacencies for ease of public use; space adjacencies for facilitation of staff interaction and communication; code requirements; incorporating sufficient meeting room spaces; facilitating deliveries to City Hall; including public art spaces; creating an attractive building design that is not too "over the top," site and building security; parking requirements; the "right" size for City Hall; planning for future space needs; cost considerations for all building elements; building materials; structural requirements; and fire code requirements. This listing is by no means exhaustive. Council Review & Direction to Consultants on Current Planning Status of Proposed City Hall Structure & Grounds August 9, 2005 Page 4 A presentation is being planned by Griffin Structures and its team that will in some detail take you through some of the issues and how they were dealt with in order to provide you with a look at the current proposed project, as it now exists. Submitted by: W_'Vwj- Homer L. Bluda City Manager COUNCIL PRESENTATION AUGUST 91 2005 What Will this Presentation Cover? Background Design Process Planning Options Aesthetic Options Budwat gariiy� F, J BACKGROUND 'i - ""', ,11 n" � r Council Working Sessions r•. Town Hall Meetings Council Input Bi- Weekly Building Committee Meetings Mayor Heffernan/ Councilman Webb/ Councilman Ridgeway August 9 Conceptual Review JA 17TW� DESIGN PROCESS/ PLANNING OPTIONS Opportunities/ Constraints Desire To Eliminate Existing Service Easement For Retail. —Fire Station Enlarged To OCFA Standards -Desire For He-Alignment Of 32111 Street " 1�1 ""', Necessity'ro Maintain rY Width And Single Direction Of Via Oporto Public Interest To Maintain ve Landmark Ficus Etc. —Existing Configuration Of Site. Desire To Eliminate Existing Service Easement For Retail. —Fire Station Enlarged To OCFA Standards -Desire For He-Alignment Of 32111 Street " 1�1 ""', QI, n • Elimination Of Retail Service Easement • Incorporate OCFA Standard Fire Station "One_Square, Foot for One Square Foot" • Creates M:) r Cpntiguou; 'te ALLEY 14,303 SF 0 rc 0 LL 0 >irl ON 28, 14,303 SF LIJ PARCEL1,. C�j PA PARCEL., 3 PARCEL 2 32nd STREE (FORMERLY <1 I WASHINGTON Site Pl9n /May V, 2005 Retail Center 4 Levels Above Grade 7-, Development d¢�vrn9 ift Council Chambers Increase Exterior Public Space Shift Community Room -w� Shift Entry Focus Le VS liE F. I What Determines Building Configuration? "=Ew� Site Configuration owmw- Sustainability EEC Sunlight/ Prevailing Breezes/ Landscape Internal Functions Community/ Public Spaces Development Ll alrvMy 5 ; T J r. Development- -- - I �1- - -. IN o r _- I r IN I Development- -- - , c iJ I n : a i I 7 ii II � it e ri . ,[.N "I,,, w \ S in 89 CS D5 F S. �, 11 P,", IJII I in 89 CS D5 F S. �, 11 P,", Ciry Hall — mm-CURRENT CITY Current Enclosed Space Temporary Trailers External Circulation Total Existing HALL 44,000 GSF 1,500 GSF 12,000 GSF 57,500 GSF �-EUILUING DEFICIENCIES ADA Minimum Standards Seismic and Public Safety Issues Work Space Minimum Requirements Minimum Restroom Requirements Building Circulation Building Age Maintenance And Operating Costs Public Space Inefficiencies LN 7 y \Y Illy ?prvrnN Ci Hall ty PROGRAM Departmental input and growth projections increase building size by 4,000 GSF. o -PUBLIC SPACE INCREASE Community Room 25000 GSF Increased Council Chambers 17000 GSF Increased Circulation/ Pre - Function/ Public Event 25000 GSF Increased Restroom Sizes 19500 GSF Increased Public Counter Area 19500 GSF \; 72, 000 GSF `;; -^ I, c Works LI Fire Admin Admin Services m Recreation First Level A LIMTHAII I, L I �Wj One Stop 0111", BUilding q Q,F I� 6 I One Stop I ' III�II T [ I COOliilUfllly � �.�. .I �t' .ail Fir;sl. Level it I 1 i 1 s i a I i II I ... _ II � Community Room Firof @y-el , Imo_ I � I C One Stop Shop y rr rnWT Public Works Fire Adnun i 1 u Code Ent Attorney Mayor/ Council City Manager Second Level i 0 I y1V PV�A j \ O M-, s Human Resources Clerk Lunch om:mmgo Aet lic F U N C T 13 N Form Follows Function The Internal Functions Define Building Shape "womwSILI STAI NAB I LITY Openings SLEE D Materials Sun Protection Building Configuration AmmmwNEWPORT BEACH A Building That Reflects The "Uniqueness" Of Newport Beach • l J n1 I I Madge "111"', City Hall View From 32nd Street Base Option HOW ■, OL i n3 rt F-I X-7 I qk 46 4b • 17- oil WX CABIN City Hall,-. Enhancements f 111TIMI-1,17 III/p lhe� vohuf&"'�'' Cl Expansio 81 000 SF Option 5,000 SF Second Level a 1 oil L 3,000 SF m m - - -------------- ICJ Al -47 --1 ill"', llln lllo.. City Hall View From 32nd Street Enhanced Option 4,0"01,) Enhanced Option ity Hall View From 32nd Street Il"", IIJ L ii I 4F I Ulf City Hall mod • ait : E�=`�" � .: � � I mil Base OL fli im, I pit I I Enhanced Vic,, hm)232" Nocci mijim 1� Fill Oil A Base IMH I rjff Enhanced I LI . L Aft, PI r ��I��,� '��.�� I��' '..'III! Ir I lull III I I'm Vf It pm / llmllcl (Ird )Tit P A. City Hall / Community Room / New COLmcil Chambers Site Work / Indirect Costs LEED Commissioning (Approved By City Council) B. Add= Program Increase 68,000 GSF To 72,000 GSF C. Add: Facade Enhancements D. Add: Stru CtUral Capability For Building Expansion Option (Building And Parking Structure) TOTAL A, B, C, D (Above): $29,053,000 $1,784,000 $2,940,000 $1,045,000 $34,822,000 PewrgN i City Hall:,_ $29,053,000 $1,784,000 $2,940,000 $1,045,000 $34,822,000 + u How Can 1 Find Out More? The Following Documents Are Available On The City Web Site: www.city. newport- beach.ca. us *Town Mall Presentations i Through 4 *Space Utilization Assessment *Existing Facility Needs Assessment • 'pace Requirement Draft • White Paper Response To Council Inquiry *Presentation given to council August 9 will be available later this week. For additional Information Contact. Homer Bludau At 949 - 644 -3000 i 0 -, "Ill"", ;: 'O'C y V,V,,VI•f /t,� City Hall Descript. Option 3 Add Alts. Total Program Revised CFayadel Revised Future Revised 5/ 1a 05 Comm. Rm Approv. Increase Total Enhancements Total Expansion Total City Hell and 100 stalls 5/10/05 68K- 72K Non -OCFA Fire Station Upgrades P9 Renovated Upgrades Council 18.683,000 1,047,000 19,730,000 1,329,000 21, 059 ,000 2,352,000 23,411,000 686,000 24,097,000 Chamhc:rs City Hall Awl Chandaers 1,479,000 0 1,479,000 99,000 1,578,000 0 1,578,000 0 1,578,000 I F&E AIIOWaiwt; On- :Ite/ OFi -5116 t4 Y1,000,000 1 0 121,000,0001 99,000 121,000,0001 0 121,000,0001 0 1 21,000,000 Utility In itdSDllClul 1 otal 1)IYCCY '_' 2,262,000 1,1147,000 23,309,000 Indirect CoSYS 5,;iil:i,0110 (Includes LEED COMM CONTGY) TOTAL 127,605,000 401,000 1 5,744,000 1,448,000 1,428,000 24,737,000 2,352,000 27,089,000 836,000 27,925,000 356,000 1 6,100,000 I 586,000 16, 688, 000 I 209,000 1,784,000 30,837,000 1 2,940,000 l33,777,000 ' 1,045,000 6,897,000 34,822,000 +� r � akftl "AIM-A - ..- ,�,• e It