HomeMy WebLinkAbout10 - Little Corona Rockweed RestorationCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item No. 10
October 24, 2006
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Public Works Department
Bob Stein, Principal Civil Engineer
949 - 644 -3322 or rstein @city.newport - beach.ca.us
SUBJECT: LITTLE CORONA ROCKWEED RESTORATION - APPROVAL OF
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CAL STATE
FULLERTON
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Cal State Fullerton, of Fullerton,
California 92683, for restoration work at Little Corona rocky intertidal areas at a not to
exceed price of $85,151 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the
Agreement.
DISCUSSION:
Since 2004, The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) has alerted coastal
agencies that dry- weather and stormwater discharges into sensitive marine. life areas
along this stretch of coast, the so called 'Areas of Special Biological Significance'
(ASBS), fall under the provisions of the California Ocean Plan which prohibits discharge
of pollutants into ASBSs. Therefore, one of the important goals of the City's Newport
Coast Watershed Management Program is the protection of ASBSs.
Earlier this year, the City was awarded a grant to perform planning studies to protect
the ASBSs areas in Orange County (two ASBSs that run the length of Newport Coast
ASBS and a third ASBS at Heisler Park in Laguna Beach). One of the grant tasks is to
develop strategies for renovating the ASBS rocky intertidal areas and to recommend a
Pilot Renovation Experiment at Little Corona to reintroduce a key marine species.
To advise the City, staff conferred with experts on ASBSs including Professor Richard
Ambrose (UCLA) and Professor Pete Raimondi (UC -Santa Cruz). A technical advisory
committee (TAC) was also formed to discuss ways to protect and restore the ASBS
along Newport. Coast. TAC members include Professor Steve Murray (Cal State
Fullerton [CSF]), Professor Jayson Smith (CSF), Dr. Jack Gregg (California Coastal
Commission), Bill Paznokas (California Department of Fish and Game), and Dave Pryor
(California Department of Parks and Recreation). Professors Ambrose, Raimondi, and
Little Corona Rockweed Restoration — Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Cal State Fullerton
October 24, 2006
Page 2
Murray are renowned marine biologists and have been conducting marine life studies
throughout California. Professor Murray has on -going studies at Little Corona, Crystal
Cove and other locations in Orange County. Professor Murray also sits on ASBS
advisory committees for the State Water Resources Control Board.
The TAC discussed different candidate species for reintroduction into the Little Corona
tide pool areas. Rockweed.was deemed the best candidate as it provides essential
canopy for breeding and habitat for fish and invertebrate species. Rockweed is found
at other locations along Newport Coast and is expected to do well at Little Corona given
proper attention in the field. Rockweed transplants will also be attempted at Crystal
Cove where there has been significant effort to catalog marine life information over the
past 15 years.
The reintroduction of the rockweed will represent the first known attempt in California to
transplant a marine species back into the rocky intertidal area; however, our TAC
experts are optimistic the attempt will prove successful. TAC members agree that a
successful project will require frequent site visits to monitor the transplants. While the
TAC agreed that the expertise for a transplant project could be provided by UC -Santa
Cruz or UCLA, the proximity of expert staff from CSF was considered rated as the
essential element for executing a successful transplant project. Therefore, the TAC
recommends that CSF perform the transplant project. CSF's work.plan and field work
will be reviewed by the TAC on a regular basis as the project develops.
The scope of CSF's research and field services will include:
• Literature. research
• Preparing a Negative Declaration
• Collecting and transplanting rockweed (two techniques) at Little Corona and
Crystal Cove
• Testing crucial conditions by adjusting field conditions to test for the effect of
grazers on rockweed and the effect of existing canopy on rockweed transplants
• Monitoring the establishment of rockweed germlings
Funding Availability:
There are sufficient funds available in the following account for the project:
Account Description Account Number Amount
Environmental Contributions 7255- C5100889 $85,151.00
Total: $85,151.00
Little Corona Rockweed Restoration — Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Cal State Fullerton
October 24, 2006
Page 3
Environmental Review:
A Negative Declaration for this project will be prepared pursuant to the State of
California Public Resources Code and the "Guidelines for Implementation of the
California Environmental Act", as amended to date.
Prepared by:
Bob Stein, P.E.
Principal Civil Engineer
Attachment: Professional Services Agreement
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FULLERTON
FOR LITTLE CORONA ROCKWEED RESTORATION
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of this _ day of
200_, by and between the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, a Municipal Corporation
( "City"), and CAL STATE FULLERTON, a state university, whose address is P.O. Box
6850, Fullerton, California, 92834 -6850 ( "Consultant "), and is made with reference to
the following:
RECITALS
A. City is a municipal corporation duly organized and validly existing. under the laws
of the State of California with the power to cant' on its. business as it is now
being conducted under the, statutes of the State of California and the Charter of
City.
B. City is planning to protect and, where possible, restore the rocky intertidal areas
along Newport Coast.
C. City desires to engage Consultant to provide research and field services to
transplant a marine species, rockweed, at two rocky intertidal areas along
Newport Coast ( "Project').
D. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and
knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement.,
E. The principal member of Consultant for purposes of Project, shall be Dr. Jayson
Smith.
F. City has solicited and received a. proposal from Consultant, has reviewed the
previous experience and evaluated the expertise of Consultant, and desires to
retain Consultant to render professional services under the terms and conditions
set forth in this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between the undersigned parties as
follows:
1. TERM
The term of this Agreement shall commence on the above written date, and shall
terminate on the 30 day of June, 2008, unless terminated earlier as set forth
herein.
2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED
Consultant shall diligently perform all the services described in the Scope of
Services attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. The
City may elect to delete certain tasks of the Scope of Services at its sole
discretion.
3. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
Time is of the essence in the performance of services under this Agreement and
Consultant shall perform the services in accordance with the schedule included
in Exhibit A. The failure by Consultant to strictly adhere to the schedule may
result in termination of this Agreement by City.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Consultant shall not be responsible for delays
due to causes beyond Consultant's reasonable control. However, in the case of
any such delay in the services to be provided for the Project, each party hereby
agrees to provide notice to the other party so that all delays can be addressed.
3.1 Consultant shall submit all requests for extensions of time for
performance in writing to the Project Administrator not later than ten (10)
calendar days after the start of the condition that purportedly causes a
delay. The Project Administrator shall review all such requests and may
grant reasonable time extensions for unforeseeable delays that are
beyond Consultant's control.
3.2 For all time periods not specifically set forth herein, Consultant shall
respond in the most expedient. and appropriate manner under the
circumstances, by;aither. telephone, fax, hand- delivery or mail.
4. COMPENSATION TO CONSULTANT
City shall pay Consultant for the services on a time and expense not -to- exceed
basis in accordance with the provisions of this Section and the Schedule of
Billing Rates attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference.
Consultant's compensation for all work performed in accordance with this
Agreement, including all reimbursable items, and subconsultant fees, shall not
exceed Eighty Five Thousand One Hundred Fifty One Dollars and no /100
($85,151.00) without prior written authorization from City. No billing rate changes
shall be made during the term of this Agreement without the prior written
approval of City.
4.1 The City .shall make progress payments monthly as the Project work
proceeds based on the percentage of Project work completed. The
Consultant shall furnish a summary breakdown of the Scope of Services
and budget for the Project in a format acceptable to the City, showing the
amount included therein for each principal category or task of the Project
work, in such detail as reasonably requested, to provide a basis for
determining progress payments. All requests for payment shall show the
percentage of work completed for each task of the Scope of Services, the
position and hours of each person who performed work under that task, a
brief description of the services performed under each task, and a
description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Consultant
2
5.
no later than thirty (30) days after approval by City staff of a request for
payment.
4.2 City shall reimburse Consultant only for those costs or expenses
specifically approved in this Agreement, or specifically approved in writing
in advance by City. Unless otherwise approved, such costs shall be
limited and include nothing more than the following costs incurred by
Consultant:
A. The actual costs of subconsuitants for performance of any of the
services that Consultant agrees to render pursuant to this
Agreement, Which have been approved in advance by City and
awarded in accordance with this Agreement
B. Approved reproduction charges.
C. Actual costs and /or other costs and /or payments specifically
authorized in advance in writing and incurred by Consultant in the
performance of this Agreement.
4.3 Consultant shall not receive any compensation for Extra Work performed
without the prior written authorization of City. As used herein, "Extra
Work" means any work that is determined by City to be necessary for the
proper completion of the Project, but which is not included within the
Scope of Services and which the parties did not :reasonably anticipate
would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Compensation
for any authorized Extra Work shall be paid in accordance with the
following Billing Rates:
Principal Investigator: $51.00 per hour
Graduate Research Assistant: $26.00 per hour
Undergraduate Research Assistant: $15.00 per hour
PROJECT MANAGER
Consultant shall designate a Project Manager, who shall coordinate all phases of
the Project. This Project Manager shall be available to City at all reasonable
times during the Agreement term.. Consultant has designated Dr. Jayson Smith
to be its Project Manager. Consultant shall not remove or reassign the Project
Manager or assign any new or replacement personnel to the Project without the
prior written consent of City. City's approval shall not be unreasonably withheld
with respect to the removal or assignment of non -key personnel.
Consultant, at the sole discretion of City, shall remove from the Project any of its
personnel assigned to the performance of services upon written request of City.
Consultant warrants that it will continuously furnish the necessary personnel to
complete the Project on a timely basis as contemplated by this Agreement.
3
6. ADMINISTRATION
This Agreement will be administered by the Public Works Department. Robert
Stein, P.E. shall be the Project Administrator and shall have the authority to act
for City under this Agreement. The Project Administrator or his /her authorized
representative shall represent City in all matters pertaining to the services to be
rendered pursuant to this Agreement.
7. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES
In order to assist Consultant in the execution of its responsibilities under this
Agreement, City agrees to, where applicable:
A. Provide access to, and upon request of Consultant, one copy of all
existing relevant information on file at City. City will provide all such
materials in a timely manner so as not to cause delays in Consultant's
work schedule.
B. Provide blueprinting and other services through City's reproduction
company for bid documents. Consultant will be required to coordinate the
required bid documents with City's reproduction company. All other
reproduction will be the responsibility of Consultant and as defined above.
C. Provide usable life of facilities criteria and information with regards to new
facilities or facilities to be rehabilitated.
8. STANDARD OF CARE
8.1 All of the services shall be performed by Consultant or under Consultant's
supervision. Consultant represents that it possesses the professional and
technical personnel required to perform the services required by this
Agreement, and that it will perform all services in a manner
commensurate with community professional standards. All services shall
be performed by qualified and experienced personnel who are not
employed by City, nor have any contractual relationship with City.
8.2 Consultant represents. and warrants to City that It has or shall obtain all
licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever
nature that are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession.
Consultant further represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at
its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the
term of this Agreement, any and all licenses, permits, insurance and other
approvals that are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession.
Consultant shall maintain a City of Newport Beach business license
during the term of this Agreement.
8.3 . Consultant shall not be responsible for delay, nor shall Consultant be
responsible for damages or be in default or deemed to be in default by
reason of strikes, lockouts, accidents, or acts of God, or the failure of City
a
to furnish timely information or to approve.or disapprove Consultant's
work promptly, or delay or faulty performance by City, contractors, or
governmental agencies.
9. HOLD HARMLESS
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend and
hold harmless City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents
and employees (collectively, the "Indemnified Parties ") from and against any and
all claims (including, without limitation, claims for bodily injury, death or damage
to property), demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits,
losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses (including,
without limitation, attorney's fees, disbursements and court costs) of every. kind
and nature whatsoever (individually, a Claim; collectively, `Claims "), which may
arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to any work performed or
services provided under this Agreement (including, without limitation, defects in
workmanship or materials and/or design defects [if the design originated with
Consultant]) or Consultant's presence or activities conducted on the Project
(including the negligent and /or willful acts, errors and/or omissions of Consultant,
its principals, officers, agents,. employees, vendors, suppliers, consultants,
subcontractors, anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them or for
whose acts they may be liable or any or all of them).
Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein shall be construed to require
Consultant to indemnify the Indemnified Parties from any Claim arising from the
sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnified Parties. Nothing in this
indemnity shall be construed as authorizing any award of attorney's fees in any
action on or to enforce the terms of this Agreement. This Indemnity shall apply
to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are
applicable. The policy limits, do not act as a limitation upon the amount of
indemnification to be provided,bythe Consultant.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
It is understood that City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis
and Consultant is not an agent or employee of City. The manner and means of
conducting the work are under the control of Consultant, except to the extent
they are limited by statute, rule or regulation and the expressed terms of this
Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute approval
for Consultant or any of Consultant's employees or agents, to be the agents or
employees of City. Consultant shall have the responsibility for and control over
the means of performing the work, provided that Consultant is in compliance with
the terms of this Agreement. Anything in this Agreement that may appear to give
City the right to direct Consultant as to the details of the performance or to
exercise a measure of control over Consultant shall mean only that Consultant
shall follow the desires of City with respect to the results of the services.
11. COOPERATION
Consultant agrees to work closely and cooperate fully with City's designated
Project Administrator and any other agencies that may have jurisdiction or
interest in the work to be performed. City agrees to cooperate with the
Consultant on the Project.
12. CITY POLICY
Consultant shall discuss and review all matters relating to policy and Project
direction with City's Project Administrator in advance of all critical decision points
in order to ensure the Project proceeds in a manner consistent with City goals
and policies.
13. PROGRESS
Consultant is responsible for keeping the Project Administrator and /or his/her
duly authorized designee informed on a regular basis regarding the status and
progress of the Project,. activities performed and planned, and any meetings that
have been scheduled or are desired.
14. INSURANCE
Without limiting Consultant's indemnification of City, and prior to commencement
of work, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during
the term of this Agreement, a policy or policies of liability insurance of the type
and amounts described. below and in a form satisfactory to City.
A. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of
insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance
coverage required herein. Insurance certificates must be approved by
City's Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance or issuance
of any permit. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with
City's at all times during the term of this Agreement.
B. Signature. A person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its
behalf shall sign certification of all required policies.
C. Acceptable Insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an
insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner
to transact business of insurance in the State of California, with an
assigned policyholders' Rating of A (or higher) and Financial Size
Category Class VII (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of
Best's Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by the City's Risk
Manager. .
D. Coverage Requirements.
Workers' Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain
Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employers Liability
Insurance for his or her employees in accordance with the laws of
n
the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each
subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation
Insurance and Employee's Liability Insurance in accordance with
the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor's
employees. Any notice of cancellation or non - renewal of all
Workers' Compensation policies must be received by City at least
thirty (30) calendar days (10 calendar days written notice of non-
payment of premium) prior to such change. The insurer shall agree
to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents,
employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed
by Consultant for City.
iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain
automobile insurance covering bodily injury and property damage
for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with
work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for
any owned, hired, non -owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not
.less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for
each occurrence.
E. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance
. policy shall be endorsed with the following specific language:
i. The City, its elected. or appointed officers, officials, employees,
agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with
respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of
the Consultant.
ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects to
City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents
and volunteers as respects to all claims, losses, or liability arising
directly or indirectly from the Consultant's operations or services
provided to City. Any insurance maintained by City, including any
self - insured retention City may have, shall be considered excess
insurance only and not contributory with the insurance provided
hereunder.
iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as
though a separate policy had been written for each, except with
respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company.
iv. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against City, its elected
or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers.
V. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall
not affect coverage provided to City, its elected or appointed
officersi officials, employees, agents or volunteers.
vi. The insurance provided by this policy shall not be suspended,
voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits, by either
7
party except after thirty (30) calendar days (10 calendar days
written notice of non - payment of premium) written notice has been
received by City.
F. Timely Notice of Claims. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely
notice of claim made or suit instituted arising out of or resulting from
Consultant's performance under this Agreement.
G. Additional Insurance. Consultant shall also procure and maintain, at its
own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own
judgment may be necessary for its proper. protection and prosecution of
the work.
15. PROHIBITION AGAINST ASSIGNMENTS AND TRANSFERS
Except as specifically authorized under this Agreement, the services to be
provided under this Agreement shall not be assigned, transferred contracted or
subcontracted out without the prior written approval of City. Any of the following
shall be construed as an assignment: The sale, assignment, transfer or other
disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Consultant, or of
the interest of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member or
cotenant if Consultant is a partnership or joint- venture or syndicate or cotenancy,
which shall result in changing the control of Consultant. Control means fifty
percent (50 %) or more of the voting power, or twenty-five percent (25 %) or more
of the assets of the corporation, partnership or joint - venture.
16. SUBCONTRACTING
City and Consultant agree that subconsultants may be used to complete the work
outlined in the Scope of Services. The subconsultants authorized by City to
perform work on this Project are identified in Exhibit B. Consultant shall be fully
responsible to City for all acts and omissions of the subcontractor. Nothing in this
Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and
subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of City to pay or to see
to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as
otherwise required by law. Except as specifically authorized herein, the services to
be provided under this Agreement shall not be otherwise, assigned, transferred,
contracted or subcontracted out without the prior written approval of City.
17. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
Each and every report, draft, map, record, plan, document and other writing
produced (hereinafter "Documents "), prepared or caused to be prepared by
Consultant, its officers, employees, agents and subcontractors, in the course of
implementing this Agreement, .shall become the exclusive property of City, and
City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further
compensation to Consultant or any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant's
expense, provide such Documents to City upon prior written request.
L.
Documents, including drawings and specifications, prepared . by Consultant
pursuant to this Agreement are not intended or represented to be suitable for
reuse by City or others on any other project. Any use of completed Documents
for other projects and any use of incomplete Documents without specific written
authorization from Consultant will be at City's sole risk and without liability to
Consultant. Further, any and all liability arising out of changes made to
Consultant's. deliverables under this Agreement by City or persons other than
Consultant is waived against Consultant and City assumes full responsibility for
such changes unless City has given Consultant prior notice and has received
from Consultant written consent for such changes.
18. COMPUTER DELIVERABLES
CADD data delivered to City shall include the professional stamp of the engineer
or architect. in charge of or responsible for the work. City agrees that Consultant
shall not be liable for claims, liabilities or losses arisifig out of, or connected with
(a) the modification or misuse by City, or anyone authorized by City, of CADD
data; (b) the decline of accuracy or readability of CADD data due to inappropriate
storage conditions or duration; or (c) any use by City, or anyone authorized by
City, of CADD data for additions to this Project, for the completion of this Project
by others; or for any other Project, excepting only such use as is authorized, in,
writing, by Consultant. By acceptance of CADD data, City agrees to indemnify
Consultant for damages and liability resulting from the modification or misuse of
such CADD data. All original drawings shall be submitted to City in the version
of AutoCAD used by CITY in ".dwg" file format on a CD, and should comply with
the City's digital submission requirements for Improvement Plans. The City will
provide AutoCAD file of City Title Sheets. All written documents shall be
transmitted to City in the City's latest adopted version of Microsoft Word and
Excel.
19. CONFIDENTIALITY
All Documents, including drafts, preliminary drawings or plans, notes and
communications that result from the services in this Agreement, shall be kept
confidential unless City authorizes in writing the release of information.
20. OPINION OF COST
Any opinion of the construction cost prepared by Consultant represents his/her
judgment as a design professional and is supplied for the general guidance of
City. Since. Consultant has no control over the cost of labor and material, or over
- competitive bidding or market conditions, Consultant does not guarantee the
accuracy of such opinions as compared to contractor bids or actual cost to City.
21. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNITY
The Consultant shall defend and indemnify City, its agents, officers,
representatives and employees against any and all liability, including costs, for
infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright
E
infringement, including costs, contained in Consultant's drawings and
specifications provided under this Agreement.
22. RECORDS
Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be
performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain complete and
accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and
any services, expenditures and disbursements charged to City, for a minimum
,period of three (3),years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date
of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. All such records and
invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of
City to examine, audit and make transcripts or copies of such records and
invoices during regular business hours. Consultant shall allow inspection of all
Work, data, Documents, proceedings and activities related to the Agreement for a
period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Consultant under this
Agreement.
23. WITHHOLDINGS
City may withhold payment to Consultant of any disputed sums until satisfaction
of the dispute with respect to such payment. Such withholding shall not be
deemed to constitute a failure to pay according to the terms of this Agreement.
Consultant shall not discontinue work as a result of such withholding. Consultant
shall have an immediate right to appeal to the City Manager or his /her designee
with respect to such disputed sums. Consultant shall be entitled to receive
interest on any withheld sums at the rate of return that City earned on its
investments during the time period, from the date of withholding of any amounts
found to have been improperly withheld.
24. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS
In the event of errors or omissions that are due to the negligence or professional
inexperience of Consultant which result in expense to City greater than what
would have resulted if there were not errors or omissions in the work
accomplished by Consultant, the additional design, construction and/or
restoration expense shall be borne by Consultant. Nothing in this paragraph is
intended to limit City's rights under any other sections of this Agreement.
25. CITY'S RIGHT TO EMPLOY OTHER CONSULTANTS
City reserves the right to- employ other Consultants in connection with the
Project.
26. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The Consultant or its employees may be subject to the provisions of the
California Political Reform Act of 1974 (the "Act "), which (1) requires such
persons to disclose any financial interest that may foreseeably be materially
10
affected by the work performed under this Agreement, and (2) prohibits such
persons from making, or participating in making, decisions that will foreseeably
financially affect such interest.
If subject to the Act, Consultant shall conform to all requirements of the Act.
Failure to do so constitutes a material breach and is grounds for immediate
termination of this Agreement by City. Consultant shall indemnify and hold
harmless City for any and all claims for damages resulting from Consultant's
violation of this Section.
27. NOTICES
All notices, demands, requests or approvals to be given under the terms of this
Agreement shall be given in writing, to City by Consultant and conclusively shall .
be deemed served when delivered personally, or on the third business day after
the deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid, first -class mail,
addressed as hereinafter provided. All notices, demands, requests or approvals
from Consultant to City shall be addressed to City at:
Robert Stein, P.E.
Public Works Department
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Phone: 949- 644 -3322
Fax: 949 -644 -3308
All notices, demands, requests or approvals from CITY to Consultant shall be
addressed to Consultant at:
Dr. Jayson Smith
SLC 246A
Department of Biological Science
Cal State Fullerton
P.O. Box 6850
Fullerton, CA 92834 -6850
Phone: 714 - 278 -4233
Fax: 714 - 278 -3426
28. TERMINATION
In the event that either party fails or refuses to perform any -of the provisions of
this Agreement at the time and in the manner required, that party shall be
deemed in default in the performance of this Agreement. If such default is not
cured within a period of two (2) calendar days, or if more than two (2) calendar
days are reasonably required to cure the default and the defaulting party fails to
give adequate assurance of due performance within two (2) calendar days after
receipt of written notice of default, specifying the nature of such default and the
11
steps necessary to cure such default, the non - defaulting party may terminate the
Agreement forthwith by giving to the defaulting party written notice thereof.
Notwithstanding the above provisions, City shall have the right, at its sole
discretion and without cause, of terminating this Agreement at any time by giving
seven (7) calendar days prior written notice to Consultant. In the event of
termination under this Section, City shall pay Consultant for services
satisfactorily performed and costs incurred up to the effective date of termination
for which Consultant has not been previously paid. On the effective date of
termination, Consultant shall deliver to City all reports, Documents and other
information developed or accumulated in the performance of this Agreement,
whether in draft or final form.
29. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS
Consultant shall at its own cost and expense comply with all statutes,
ordinances, regulations and requirements of all governmental entities, including
federal, state, county or municipal, whether now in force or hereinafter enacted.
In addition, all work prepared by Consultant shall conform to applicable City,
county, state and federal laws, rules, regulations and permit requirements and be
subject to approval of the Project Administrator and City.
30. WAIVER
A waiver by either party of any breach,. of any term, covenant or condition
contained herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach
of the same-or any other term, covenant or condition contained herein, whether
of the same or a different character.
31. INTEGRATED CONTRACT
This Agreement represents the full and complete understanding of every kind or
nature whatsoever between the parties hereto, and all preliminary negotiations
and agreements of whatsoever kind or nature are merged herein. No verbal
agreement or implied covenant shall be held to vary the provisions herein.
32. CONFLICTS OR INCONSISTENCIES
In the event there are any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement
and the Scope of Services or any other attachments attached hereto, the terms
of this Agreement shall govern.
33. INTERPRETATION
The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning
of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by
reason of the authorship of the Agreement or any other rule of construction
which might otherwise apply.
34. AMENDMENTS
This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document
executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City
Attorney.
12
35. SEVERABILITY.
If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise
unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of
this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
36. CONTROLLING LAW AND VENUE
The laws of the State of California shall govern this Agreement and all matters
relating to It and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be
adjudicated in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Orange.
37. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT
Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not
discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment
because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on
the day and year first written above.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
74 4-v"' C. W�
Aaron. C. Harp, Assistant City Attorney
for the City of Newport Beach
ATTEST:
By:
LaVonne Harkless,
City Clerk
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH,
A Municipal Corporation
By:
Mayor
for the City of Newport Beach
CONSULTANT:
(Corporate Officer)
Title:
Print Name:
By:
(Financial Officer)
Title:
Print Name:
Attachment: Exhibit A — Scope of Services
Exhibit B —Schedule of Billing Rates
f:WsersVbwlshared\agreementsVy 06 -OAcsf -little corona rockweed.doc
13
EXHIBIT A
Newport Coast and Laguna Beach ASBS Protection Program:
Experimental Restoration of the rockweed Silvetia compressa
at Little Corona del Mar
October, 2006
Principal Investigators
Dr. Jayson R. Smith; California State University, Fullerton
Dr. Steven N. Murray; California State University, Fullerton
Research Associate:
Stephen Whitaker; California State University, Fullerton
Funding Requested:
January 12007 — December 312008 $80,149
Project Summary:
1. From existing publications and research, it is known that rockweeds were
abundant components of the rocky intertidal zone at Little Corona del Mar (LCM)
in the 1950s but have not been present at the site for more than three decades.
2. An experimental restoration effort will be conducted at LCM and two surrounding
locations to experimentally test techniques to restore rockweeds (Silvetia
compressa) in the upper /middle intertidal zone.
3. Transplants will be conducted at two experimental sites (LCM and Crystal Cove -
CC) and at a reference (donor) site located at Cameo Shores (CS). This design
will enable evaluation of the restoration techniques (comparisons of results for
donor site with LCM and CC) and the suitability of present -day conditions at
LCM for rockweeds (comparisons of LCM with CC and CS).
4. Two techniques will be investigated to transplant rockweeds using rockweed
sources from CS. These will include:
a. Chipping off rock pieces with juvenile rockweeds attached and epoxing
the rock into similar habitats at LCM, CC, and CS.
b. Out - planting fertile receptacles contained in nylon mesh bags in the
intertidal zone at all three sites to serve as sources of germlings seeded by
natural reproductive processes.
5. A crossed experimental design will be used to investigate potential factors
affecting rockweed populations and transplant success with a combination of two
treatments; grazer and canopy presence or absence. Grazers will be excluded with
the use of copper -based fouling paint while an artificial canopy will be
constructed to mimic an adult Silvetia canopy.
6. Transplant survivability or presence of new recruits will be monitored at all sites
and tested among treatments to investigate success of transplant methodology.
Statement of the vroblem:
. In urban southern California, coastal communities are being altered by the
combined impacts of urbanization, climate change, and human visitation, a complexity of
events that pose severe challenges to coastal managers. Previous research has revealed
ecologically significant changes in the distributions and abundances of invertebrate and
seaweed populations over the past 25 years, particularly on rocky shores near urban
centers (Goodson 2003; Gerrard 2005; Murray et al., unpublished data). This mirrors
alterations of rocky intertidal community structure that were reported to have occurred
from the 1950s to the 1970s (Widdowson 1971; Thom 1976; Littler 1977.1978, 1979;
Littler and Littler 1987). Recent comparative studies carried out in intertidal zones
throughout southern California by Murray and colleagues have indicated shifts in
macrophytes from large to mid- sized, fleshy, highly productive seaweeds towards a less
diverse and less productive seaweed flora represented by small, disturbance - tolerant turf -
formers at many sites during the past three decades.
At LCM, similar to other southern California locations, investigations have
demonstrated extensive changes in the abundances of macrophyte and macroinvertebrate
populations during the last five decades. Marked declines were observed in large
gastropods, filter- feeding sponges, tunicates, bryozoans, and predatory nudibranchs while
small, mobile invertebrates and colonial tubewonns increased in abundance (Goodson
2003; Murray et al. unpublished data). In addition, larger, fleshy seaweeds such as the red
alga Gelidium robustum, G. nidif:ca, and G. purpurascens, and the brown algae Egregia
menziesii, Colpomenia spp., and Silvetia compressa have declined or are completely
absent while smaller, turf - forming species, such as the red seaweeds Lithothrix
aspergillum; Corallina pinnatifolia, Caulacanthus ustulatus and crustose algae, such as
the brown alga Ralfsia spp., have increased (Goodson 2003; Murray et al. unpublished
data).
The decline of the rockweed Silvetia compressa (J. Ag.) Serrao, Cho, Boo, &
Brawley (previously known as Pelvetia fastigiata and Pelvetia compressa) is of particular
concern; S. compressa is an important species within the rocky intertidal zone as it is
highly productive and acts as a microhabitat by providing canopy protection for a large
number of intertidal organisms that seek refuge from harsh environmental conditions
during low tides (Sapper and Murray 2003). At LCM, E.Y. Dawson (1959) noted that S..
compressa was an abundant species in the 1950s. However, during subsequent resurveys
of Dawson's sampling locations beginning in the 1970s, S. compressa was notably absent
(Nicholson and Cimberg 1971; Thom 1976; Goodson 2003; Murray et al. unpublished
data). The reasons for the disappearance of S. compressa at LCM are unknown but are
likely related to anthropogenically- induced changes in environmental conditions at the
site. Declines in S. compressa and other rockweeds also have been detected at other
southern California sites receiving high amounts of human influence.
The goal of this project is to experimentally investigate potential techniques to re-
introduce Silvetia compressa into the intertidal zone at LCM where it previously was
present. S. compressa is a good candidate for restoration for several reasons. First, as
discussed, it is an important microhabitat forming species that provides food and shelter
to a diverse community of invertebrates and algae. Successful restoration of this habitat -
forming species may eventually lead to an increase in the abundances of other rocky
intertidal populations and an increase in species diversity at the site. Second, S.
compressa recruits within a small radius ( <1 m) of the adult source population (Williams
and Di Fiori 1996; Johnson and Brawley 1998; Moeller 2002). Therefore, restoration of
S. compressa populations at LCM will most likely result in future local recruitment and
population maintenance and increased overall abundance of this key species at the site.
This is compared the reproductive patterns of many intertidal species, which are
characterized by long- distance dispersal. In these cases, local recruitment is generally not
enhanced by local reproductive populations but, instead, new recruits are contributed by
source populations far removed from the site.
Methodology:
Very few studies have been directed at the restoration of S. compressa, or other
seaweeds, on temperate rocky coastlines and none to our knowledge in southern .
California. Therefore, this study is truly experimental in nature and involves a scientific
instead of a "shot -gun" approach to restoration.
Three rocky intertidal locations will be used in this study: LCM, CC, and a reference
(donor) site (CS) which will act as the source of rockweed materials.
We propose to test the efficacy of two out - planting techniques under differing
conditions. One method will involve the collection of small individual S. compressa
plants (1 -2 cm) as well as the rock to which they are adhered. This will be accomplished
by chipping off small sections of bedrock which support live, natural recruits at the donor
site and then reattaching them at the donor and two recipient sites using marine epoxy. A
second technique will be to naturally seed substratum at each site by attaching bags of
receptacles (the reproductive portion of S. compressa which contains gametes and eggs)
at each of the sites. In this case, the receptacles may provide new germlings into the
population through natural fertilization events. Outplanting techniques will be conducted
into the two experimental sites as well as at the donor site, which Will serve as a
methodological control. All methods of transplanting S. compressa juveniles or
receptacles will be performed in similar habitat and at comparable tidal heights at each
site.
Two of the most crucial conditions which could have profound effects on the
success of transplants are the presence of grazers and the absence of canopy protection.
Grazers may damage or completely remove transplanted juveniles or seeded germlings.
Canopy absence may subject new recruits to desiccation stress during long periods
without cover in the sun and wind during low tides, and to mechanical disturbance caused
by wave action during high tides. Furthermore, Silvetia compressa is known to settle 1 -2
times more successfully under the presence of adult algal canopies (Johnson and Brawley
1998). To test the effects of these variables, a crossed experimental design will be
executed by employing combinations of grazer and canopy presence and absence
treatments. Four treatments are envisioned:.
Grazers Present
Grazer Excluded
Canopy
Absent
Canopy
I Present
Canopy
Absent
Canopy
I Present
Grazer exclusion will be achieved by surrounding out - planted juveniles and newly
recruited germlings with a mixture of epoxy and copper -based anti- fouling paint. Use of
copper -based paint has been used frequently in grazer exclusion experiments (e.g. Cubit
1984; Benedetti- Cecchi and Cinelli 1997; Paine 1984, 1992, 2002) as mobile
invertebrates such as limpets and chitons tend to avoid and not crawl over copper -laced
epoxy. Canopy protection will be afforded artificially, possibly with use of small mop -
like structures.
For juveniles that are epoxied to the rock, restoration success will be measured
through photographic monitoring of the survivability and growth of transplanted
juveniles. To measure the success of out - planted receptacles, we will monitor the
establishment of new germlings that will likely recruit directly under the receptacle bags.
We will then monitor the survival of these germlings over time. Survivability, growth,
and/or recruitment will be compared among treatments and among locations (LCM, CC,
and CS).
The study is projected to begin in the winter of 2007 to coincide with the natural
reproductive season of S. compressa. Monitoring will take place on a regular basis. Six
months following the initial renovation effort, we will attempt to determine which
techniques appear to be most successful based on preliminary results and report our
findings to Weston. From these data, we and Weston can determine whether further out -
planting can be conducted at a series of distances from Buck Gully for future measures of
tissue toxin content analyses to determine potential impacts of dry- weather runoff.
Caveats:
It must be appreciated that this restoration effort is an experiment. Although the
proposed methodologies are sound and based on a strong understanding of rockweed
biology and attempts by other investigators to transplant seaweeds for experimental (not
restoration) purposes, there is no guarantee that successful restoration will be achieved at
LCM..Nevertheless, the results of this study will be informative to coastal managers and
others concerned about declines of important, habitat - forming, intertidal populations and
might lead to the design and implementation of future studies to restore disturbed
intertidal habitats.
Schedule of Tasks:
Preparation of out - planting techniques, scouting of suitable donor populations,
mapping and decision making on locations within sites for renovation — November to
December 2006
2007
Out -plant of Siivetia compressa juveniles and receptacles — January to February
Monitoring of out - planted materials — January 2007 to June 2008
Report to Weston on preliminary patterns of success of renovation techniques for
future tissue analyses — August 2007
Data analyses and draft of report for the City of Newport and the Technical
Advisory Committee — July to October 2008
Final report to the City of Newport and the Technical Advisory Committee —
October to December 2008
Report Deliverables:
• A brief summary report of patterns observed 6 months following initial
restoration efforts will be given to Weston to determine whether finther out -
planting can be conducted at a series of distances from Buck Gully for future
measures of tissue toxin content analyses to determine potential impacts of dry -
weather runoff.,
• A draft pilot restoration report will be written and submitted to the City of
Newport and the Technical Advisory Committee for comment and review.
• A final pilot restoration report will be written and submitted to the City of
Newport.
Budeet Justification:
Funds are requested to release PI Smith from 10.0 % of his teaching duties during
the first academic year. Benefit rates on fimds for PI Smith are calculated at the
prescribed CSUF rate of 39.812% for released time. PI Murray will work as a volunteer
on this project. PIs Smith and Murray will oversee the execution of the project, interface
with Weston and the City of Newport Beach, and prepare the required reports.
. Funds are requested to support research assistance during each year of the study..
Stephen Whitaker will serve as the primary research associate on the project. He will
play a lead role in the project and will. bear major responsibility for coordinating the
fieldwork, supervising other student and volunteer participants, overseeing field data
reduction tasks, and.carrying out transplant experiments. The RA also will be
coordinating the study with outside parties, including the City of Newport Beach and the
Technical Advisory Committee, the Department of Fish and Game, and interested parties
from Laguna Beach and elsewhere.
Funds for expendable equipment, supplies and materials are required to perform
the specified work. Funds will be used to purchase the usual field and lab supplies for this
kind of work including data books, software upgrades (including statistical analysis
software), diskettes, rainwear, replacement transect tapes, carrying bags, epoxy cement,
marking tools, chisels, screening material, anti - fouling paint, stainless steel bolts and
drop anchors, digital camera supplies, etc. A total of $3,000 is budgeted for year one and
$1,500 for year two for expendable equipment and supplies.
This project will require multiple trips to southern California intertidal sites.
Funds. are requested to cover travel costs associated with the field elements of this
research program and to allow the PIs and Trainee to attend and present research results
at a relevant scientific meeting. Travel costs for the two years have been budgeted at
$1,200 for year one and $1,000 for year two.
The negotiated.F &A/IDC rate for California State University, Fullerton, is 39.5 %
of MTDC and 22.0 % of MTDC for work performed primarily in the field. Since this
project will be carried out extensively in the field, the 22.0 % F &A/IDC rate has been
assigned. F &A/IDC amounts to $8,843 in year 1 and $5,610 in year 2 of the project.
Literature Cited:
Benedetti- Cecchi, L., and F. Cinelli. 1997. Confounding in field experiments: direct and
indirect effects of artifacts due to the manipulation of limpets and macroalgae.
Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 209: 191 -194.
Cubit, J. 1984. Herbivory and the seasonal abundance of algae on a high intertidal rocky
shore. Ecology. 65:1904 -1917.
Dawson, E.Y. 1959. A primary report on the benthic marine flora of southern California:
in Oceanographic survey of the continental shelf area of southern California.
Publication of the California State Water Pollution Control Board. 20:169 -264.
Gerrard, A. 2005. Changes in rocky intertidal floras along the Palos Verdes peninsula
(Los Angeles County) since E.Y. Dawson's surveys in, the late 1950s. MS thesis,
California State University, Fullerton. 78 pgs.
Goodson, J. 2003. Long -term changes in rocky intertidal populations and communities at
Little Corona del Mar, California: a synthesis using traditional and non - traditional .
data. MS thesis, California State University, Fullerton. 71 pgs.
Johnson, L.E., and S.H. Brawley. 1998. Dispersal and recruitment of a canopy - forming
intertidal alga: the relative roles of propagule availability and post - settlement
processes. Oecologia. 117:517 -526.
Littler, M.M. 1977. Biological features of rocky intertidal communities near Corona del
Mar, California. Report 2.1: in Spatial and temporal variation in the distribution
and abundance of rocky intertidal and tidepool biotas in the Southern California
Bight. (Littler, M. M., ed.). Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the
Interior, Washington, D.C.
Littler, M.M. 1978. Variations in the rocky intertidal biota near Corona del Mar, Orange
County, California. Report 1.1.2: in The annual and seasonal ecology of southern
California subtidal, rocky intertidal and tidepool biotas, Vol. III. (Littler, M. M.,
ed.). Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington,
D.C.
Littler, M.M. 1979. Assessments of the distribution, abundance, and community structure
of rocky intertidal organisms at Corona del Mar, Orange County. Report 1.5: in
The distribution, abundance and community structure of rocky intertidal and
tidepool biotas in the Southern California Bight, Vol. II. (Littler, M. M., ed.).
Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C.
Littler, M.M., and D.S. Littler. 1987. Effects of stochastic processes on rocky - intertidal
biotas: an unusual flash flood near Corona del Mar, California. Bulletin of the
Southern California Academy of Sciences. 86: 95 -106.
Moeller, J.M. 2002. Seasonal and spatial patterns of reproduction and recruitment in a
population of the intertidal rockweed Silvetia compressa (Fucales). MS Thesis,
California State University, Fullerton. 37 pgs.
Nicholson, N.L., and R. L. Cimberg. 1971. The Santa Barbara oil spills of 1969: a post
spill survey of the rocky intertidal. Pp. 325 -401: in Biological and
oceanographical survey of the Santa Barbara Channel oil spills. (D. Straughan,
ed.), Allan Hancock Foundation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Paine, R.T. 1984. Ecological determinism in the competition for space. Ecology.
65:1339 -1348.
Paine, R.T. 1992. Food -web analysis through field measurement of per capita interaction
strength. Nature. 355:73 -75.
Paine, R.T. 2002. Trophic control of.production in a rocky intertidal community. Science.
296:736 -739.
Sapper, S.A., and S.N. Murray. 2003. Variation in structure of the subcanopy assemblage
associated with southern California populations of the intertidal rockweed Silvetia
compressa (Fucales). Pacific Science. 57:433 -462.
Thom, R.M., and T.B. Widdowson. 1978. A resurvey of E. Yale Dawson's 42 intertidal
algal transects on the southern California mainland after 15 years. Bulletin of the
Southern California Academy of Sciences. 77:1 -13.
Widdowson, T.B. 1971. Changes in the intertidal algal flora of the Los Angeles area
since the survey by E. Yale Dawson in 1956 -1959. Bulletin of the Southern
California Academy of Sciences. 70:2 -16.
Williams, S.L., and R.E. Di Fiori. 1996. Genetic diversity and structure.in Pelvetia
fastigiata (Phaeophyta: Fucales): does a small effective neighborhood size explain
fine -scale genetic structure? Marine Biology. 126:371 -382.
8-
s
Go
Experimental Restoration of Rockweed
October 10, 2006
ID
Task Name
Duration start Finish Predecessors
2007 2008 2009
Qtr 4 1 Qtr 1 1 Qtr 2 1 Qtr 3 1 Qtr 4 1 Qtr 1 I Qtr 2 1 Qtr 3 1 Qtr 4 1 Qtr.1
I I
;
2
_. __.._____ _..., _.......
Preparation of outplanting techniques
_
__ ays _ ....... ........ .__.r_....__
66 d I Mon 11/06!06 r. Mon 02/05 /07 I
scouting and mapping of sites etc
l
i 1' Tue 12/19/06
-
'
3
Negative Declaration
22 days Mon 11120lO6
.4
Out - planting effort
44 dayTTue 02/06/107 Fd 04/06!07 2,3
5
Monitonng of out- planted material
347 daysi Mon 04/09/07 L. Tue 08 105!08 14
: ?:: � r ?':;': '.: ;:: � •� :'� � r %: � :':. �� ;:;::; '
6
------.__.._...._., _.... ._.....il—nai._..............,.
Report to Weston on preliminary
--- ------ _.__/01/07 . 05/ ..
0 days Tue 05/01/07 Tue OS /01!071
I
1
®05101
results of successful restoration
I I
-
7
_
Data analyses, first draft to City of
_
BS days Wed 08106!08 I'. Fri 12/05/08 5.
Newport
I �. a
8
Can Ef Newport Beach
p b
._.r_— I
50 days.I Mon 12/08/08 Fri 02/13/09 T
I
and TACortt
Task
Milestone ®
External Tasks _.
Protect:
Schedule 101006
'
Split
Summary
External Milestone
Date: Thu 10 /12/06
• ^ ^•• ^' ^ ^ ^•
Progress ® Protect Summary
Deadline
Page 1
Exhibit B
Sponsor: City of Newport Beach
PI: Jayson Smith and Steven Murray
Title: Experimental Restoration of the rockweed Silvetia cour ressa at Little Corona del Mar
Project Period: 01/01/07 - 12/31/08, 2 Year Total Budget
Der ed Budget
Universitv
Personnel:
ISDonsorl
Cost
Share Units
1
Steve Muria
Release TimetReassinged Time
6187
24
0%
0%.$
Overload
8167
$
0%
0%
$
Winter &.Summer
8167
$
0%
0%
$
21
Jay.Smith
Release Time/Reassl ed Time
8187
24
0%
0%
$. 4 360
OVerload
8167
$
0%
0%
$
Winter & Summer
8167
0%
0°!0
$
31
Co PI NAME
Release TimetReassinged Time
8187
24
$
0%
00/0
$
Overload
8167
$
0%
0°!0
$
Winter & Summer
8167
$
16%
00/0
$
4
lCo PI NAME
Release TimetReassinged Time
8187
24
$
0%
0°!0
$
Overload
8167
$
0%
0%
$
Winter & Summer
8167
$
0%
00%
$
5
Co PI NAME
Release Time/Reasdinged Time
8187
24
$
0%
0%
$
Overload
8167
$
0%
0%
$
Winter & Summer
8167
$
0%
0%
$
Foundation
Full
Time/Full Benefit Personnel:
6
6267
$
0%
0°!0
$
61
1
1
8267
$
0%
0%
$
Foundation.
Part
Time/Partial Benefit Personnel:
71
1 1
8367
$
0%
0%
$
Foundation
Part Time/No Benefits Personnel:
8
Research Assistants'
8167
100 °h
0%
$ 46 000
9
8167
$
0%
0°!0
$
10
.
8167
$
0%
0 °h
$
11
8167
$.
0%
0%
$
12
8167
$
0%
0°!0
$
SUBTOTAL PERSONNEL
$ 50,360
B.
FRINGE BENEFITS
8158 - 8166,8170
Rate
Factor
University Personnel:
1
Steve Murray I
Release TimetReassinged Time
39.812%
0.39612
$
Ovedoad 1
15.000%
0.15
$
Winter & Summer
15.000%
0.15
$ -
2
Jay Smith
Release Time/Reassin ad Time
39.812%
- 0.39812
$ 1 736
Overload
15.000%
0.15
$
Winter & Summer
15.000 °h
0.15
$
3
Co PI NAME
Release Time/Reassi e5TTimfte
39.812%
0.39812
$
Overload
15.000%
0.15
$ -
Winter & Summer
15.000%
0.15
$
4122
PI NAME
Release Trme/Reassin e39.812
°�
0. 39812
$
Ovedoad 1
15.000%
0.15
$
Winter & Summer
15.000%
0.15
$
5
Co PI NAME
Release TimelReassln
Time
39.812%
0.39812
$
Omdoad
15.000%
0.15
$
Winter & Summer
15.000%
0.15
$
Foundation
Full Time/Full Benefit Personnel Add $7,865 per
FT sition
:
6
0
15% +$7,865
15% +$7865
$
6
0
1 115%
+$7,865
15% +$7865
$
Foundation
Part TimelPartial Benefit Personnel Add $1,728
PT
sition :
7
0
1
15% +$1728
15% +$1728
$
Foundation
Part TimelNo Benefits Personnel:
8
Research
Assistants
15.000%
0.15
$ 6,9W
9
0
15.000%
0.15
$ -
10
0
15.000%
0.15
$ -
11
0
15.000%
0.15
$
12
01
1
15.000%
0.15
$
SUBTOTAL
FRINGE BENEFITS
$ 8,636
SUBTOTAL
PERSONNEL & FRINGE BENEFITS
$ 68,996
C.
JOTHER
PERSONNEL (NON CSU, i.e. Consultant)
$$/hour
hours
11
1
1
8114
$
0
$ -
21
8114
$ -
0
$ -
31
8114
$
0
$
SUBTOTAL
OTHER
PERSONNEL
$ -
D.
ISUBCONTRACTS
- Weston Solutions
1
Neqabve Declaration
8120
$ 4100
2
8120
$
3
8120
$
SUBTOTAL
SUBCONTRACTS
$ 4,100
E.
PARTICIPANT
COSTS
$/ participant
# participants
1
Participant Stipends
8171
$
0
$ -
2
Studentrrrainee Tulfion and Fees
8174
$ - -
1
$
3
Studentlrrainee Books & Supplies
8143
$
0
$
SUBTOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS
1
$
F.
TRAVEL
$$/tri
#trips
1
Out -of -State Travel
8173
$
0
$ '
2
In -Ste Travel
8173
$
0
$ 2200
31Memational
Travel
8176
$
0
$
SUBTOTAL TRAVEL
$ 2,200
G.
1EQUIPMENT (Tagged Items)
$$ /unit
units
11
Permanent Equipment #1 over $5,000)
8124
$
0
$ -
21Expendable
Equipment
8130
$
0
$ -
SUBTOTAL EQUIPMENT
$ _
H.
JOTHER DIRECT COSTS
subtotals
1
Materials 1
8143
$ 4,500
2
Office Supplies
8146
$
31Employee
Development
8144
$
4
Instnrctional Materials
8133
$
5
Du lication/PrinBn
8123
$
6
Telephone 1
8112
7
Repairs
and Maintenance
8142
$ -
8
P4sta
8212
$ -
9
Other Direct Costs
1 8147
$
SUBTOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
$ 4,500
I.
IDIRECT COST
$ 69,796
J.
MODIFIED TOTAL DIRECT COST (MTDC)*
$ 69,796
K.
FACILITIES & ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS
220% MTDC
8131
Sponsor Rate:
0.220
$ 16,355
01 of MTDC
8132
Sponsor Rate
0.000
$ -
L
UNRECOVERED F&A COSTS (IDC on CSUF Cost Match and Unrecovered Full IOC) '**
-
1 8131
University Rate
0.000
M.
TOTAL COST
ji
3' .