Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-07-1982 - AgendaT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH r PARKS, BEACHES AND RECREATION COMMISSION w Regular Meeting Held September 7, 1982 pity Hall Council Chambers 7:00 P.M. AGENDA I. PROCEDURAL MATTERS: 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes - Meeting of August 3, 1982' 4. Adoption of Agenda SPECIAL RECOGNITION AWARDS: GIRLS SOFTBALL l(J' III.. ITEMS•FOR ACTION: lam` •5a Volleyball Court Policies "(Material Attached) IV. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: 60,' Tree Trimming Practices (Report Attached) �pvw„ •7. Study of .Alternate Uses Marinapark Mobile Home Park.(Report Attached) V. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS: �. 8. Park Division'(Report•Attached) 9. Recreation Division (Report Attached) r1 /. ,(% VI; SPECIAL, URGENT OR LAST - MINUTE ITEMS: /D. Aab- Sy�wm­-- VII. A_ DJOURNMENT: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission-Meetings are tape recorded; testimony limited to 5 minutes. " �6 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Present. Motion Second Ayes r1 LA Motion Second Ayes Absent n U arks, Beaches & Recreation Commission City Council Chambers I WAS - 1 0011141W, Y X X X X( X Ex- Officio Member Presen Staff Present: I. PROCEDURAL MATTERS: Item #1 Me meeting of the Parks was called to order at 7 Item #3 X Motion was made to appro, X X X X X meeting with the additioi Item #4 TTie agenda was adopted a! II'. ITEMS FOR ACTION:' Tiem #5 Election of vice chairmai X ed nominations for vice ( XU X X X nominated Commissioner H( X ed the nomination. Nomii Hopkins was unanimously ( Item #6 Chairman Stuart briefly a show of hands on how m( Commission on beach voll( chair of the Vollyball s( of the'sub- committees pr( then opened the meeting 1 16 people addressed the ( favor of maintaining bea( Some problems with litter man Stuart closed public committee to prepare.a di the testimony given ton* nament location. 7 p.m. - INDEX .: Ronald A. Whitley, Director Jeffrey C. Kolin, Rec. Supt. Jack Brooks, Park Supt. Beaches and Recreation Commission 10 P.M. ,e the minutes of the July 6, 1982 i of the vote on Item #9, page 4. presented. i for 1982 =83, Chairman Stuart open- :hairman.• Commissioner Ammerman ipkins. Commissioner Cohen second - iations were closed. Commissioner elected vice chairman for 82=83. ' ntroduced the subject and asked for ny people were here to address the ybaTl. Commissioner Morin, as b- committee, gave a brief summary egress to date. Chairman Stuart 'or public testimony. -Approximately ommission, most were strongly in h volleyball in Newport Beach. and crowds were discussed. Chair - testimony and directed the sub - aft policy which would incorporate ght and recommend a permanent tour- Call to Order Approval of Minutes Adoption of Agenda Election of Vice Chair- man-for 82- 83. Beach Volley ball Study/ -Recommenda tions k 3 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH arks, Beaches & Recreation Cortimission City Council Chambers 7 p.m. IND8X Item #7 Marinapark Ron WFitley gave the Commission a brief background on Study /Rec Marinapark. Chairman Stuart then called on Bob Lenard ommendations of the City Planning staff to explain the mobile home park overlay concept. Chairman Stuart then opened the meeting to public testimony. James Parker, an attorney representing the residentSof Marinapark addressed the Commission and re- quested that they support the mobile home park zoning over - Motion X lay. Public testimony was closed by Chairman Stuart. The Vote Commission discussed the mobile home park overlay and the Abstain return of-the Marinapark to recreation and open space. Ayes X'X X.X X Commissioner Cole moved that the Commission'accept the Co- Absent mmittees recommendation to oppose the adoption of a mobile home park zoning overlay for Marinapark and to pursue the return of Marinapark to recreation and open space. IteT m #8 Caltrans Chairman.Stuart briefly introduced the item and called on West ton X Commissioner•Hopkins to give the sub - committee report and Second recommendations. Following a brief discussion, Commissioner Ayes X X X X X X Cole moved to adopt the committees recommendations. Second- ed by Commissioner Ammerman. Unanimous. Item #9 destbay Ron Whitley gave a staff report on the Westbay Park-concept. ark Con - The Natural History Foundation of Orange County is propos -• cept ing to develop the site as an interpretive and natural his- tory center. Ron Yeo of the-Natural History Foundation Motion X made a brief presentation. Commissioner Capretz moved that Ayes X X X X X X the staff recommendation be.adopted. Approved unanamously. Commissioner Cole moved that staff be directed to explore Exchange Motion X possible negotiations with Ca1trans•for the exchange of destbay for Second X Westbay Park for Caltrans West. Commissioner Cohen second- altrans Ayes X X X ed. Motion failed 3 - 4 - 0, dest Nay X . X X • CITY OF IIEWPORT BEACH Parks, Beaches & Recreation Department DATE: August 31, 1982 TO: PARKS, BEACHES& RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: PARKS, BEACHES &. RECREATION DPRECTOR SUBJECT: VOLLEYBALL COURT LOCATIONS After-Commission review and further study by the Volleyball sub - committee the attached proposed resolution and.court , locations are presented for Commission consideration.- Also included in the informational material are communications that notified property owners-and volleyball players of the recommendations. If the Commission is• comfortable with the proposal_ and the process.that was taken to arrive at the recommendation, it can be transmitted to the City Council for approval. Or, the Commission can pursue additional public input etc. as timing is not a critical factor until next summer. Ronald A. Whitley Director RAW:dob �5 11 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH • PARKS, BEACHES & RECRATION DEPT. A resolution of the City Council of the City of Newport Beach establishing regulations controlling the installation and main - tenance of volleyball playing areas on the public beaches in the City of Newport Beach and rescindinq Resolution No. 7282. WHEREAS, Resolution No. 7282, which was adopted on September 28, 1970, sets forth the existing regulation for the installation and maintenance of vollevball courts on public beaches in the City; and WHEREAS, The Newport Beach Parks, Beaches & Recreation Com- mission has made-certain recommendations that said requlations be re- vised and updated; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the recommendations of the Parks. Beaches & Recreation Commission and wishes to� establish these recommendations as the regulations for the installation and maintenance of volleyball playing areas-on the public beaches in Newport Beach; .NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City •of Newport Beach hereby establishes the followinq requlations for the in- stallation and maintenance of volleyball playing areas on the public beaches in the City of Newport Beach: SECTION 1. The public ocean front and bay beaches shall be divided into five volleyball playing zones which are identified as follows: ZONE ONE shall-be the area between the Santa Ana River and.Orange Ave. ZONE TWO shall be the area between the Orange Ave. and the Newport Pier; ZONE THREE shall be the area between the Newport.Pier and the West Jetty; ZONE FOUR shall be the main beach at Corona del Mar State Park and City Beach Park; ZONE FIVE shall be all the public beaches fronting on the waters of Newport Bay. SECTION 2. No volleyball courts shall be installed with- in fifty feet (50') of a private property line or sidewalk in any of the five volleyball playing zones established herein. Volleyball courts shall be in- stalled perpendicular to the beach. SECTION 3. Tandem volleyball courts shall have a minimum . of ten feet (101) of spacing separating the center posts in all zones. SECTION 4. Temporary volleyball courts may be installed for a period no longer than three (3) consecutive days for special tournaments or party groups upon approval of the Parks, Beaches & Recreation Department. Persons requesting permission to install temporary volleyball courts shall be responsible for the installation and removal of the temporary courts and shall in addition obtain a special permit from the Citv P.B & R. Department. SECTION 5. Permanent Tournament locations shall be estab- lished at the Balboa Pier between "B" and "C" Streets, and at Corona del Mar State Beach. Each site shall have eioht (8) permanent courts. SECTION 6. Vollevball courts are authorized at the follow- ing locations (see attached list) and shall be inspected and maintained by the P.B. & R. Department. SECTION 7. Applications for installation of new and /or additional permanent courts may be submitted for review by the P.B. & R. Co- mmission. Application forms are available from the P.B. & R. Department and should include a map and petition from neighbors within 200 feet of proposed installation. SECTION 8. Existing courts not included in the list of authorized courts will be removed by the P.B. & R. Department. Owners will, have 30 days to remove a volleyball court following posting of notice by the • P.B. & R. Department. Residents may use the application procedure to appeal removal• by the P.B. &' R.• Department to the P.B. & R. Commission. SECTION 9. Maintenance and installation, of volleyball courts shall be by the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department Staff. Poles shall by 6 "X6!'X12' inch wood except at the Balboa Pier Tournament location where they "shall have metal poles. Non - authorized courts shall be removed by the P.B. & R. Department. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH • PARK, BEACHES AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT September 9, 1982 APPROVED BEACH VOLLEYBALL Pole Locations "M" STREET "L" STREET Between "I" & "H" STREET Between "G" & "H" STREET "F" STREET Between "E" & "F." STREET "D" STREET "C" STREET • "B" STREET WEST SIDE BALBOA PIER PARKING LOT ISLAND STREET 6th STREET 7th STREET 9th STREET 10th STREET 11th STREET 12th STREET 13th STREET 15th STREET 17th STREET Between 18th & 19th STREET 20th STREET 24th STREET 26th STREET 28th STREET 30th STREET 34th STREET 38th STREET 40th STREET • • • APPROVED VOLLEYBALL LOCATIONS - Page 2 43rd STREET - Between 46th & 47th STREET Between 49th & 50th STREET 52nd STREET 55th STREET 58th STREET 59th STREET Between 62nd & Prospect Colton Double Court FERN STREET GRANT Double Court Between GRANT & HIGHLAND HIGHLAND SONORA Double Court POLES RECOMMENED FOR REMOVAL OR RELOCATION "I" STREET 1 non -City wood pole "C" STREET Remove one pole Relocate 2 pole further from sidewalk "B" STREET Relocate 2 poles further from sidewalk 308 OCEANFORNT Remove 2 poles 266 OCEANFRONT Remove 2 poles 704 OCEANFRONT Remove single flag pole, trampoline pit Between 8th & 9th ST. Remove 2 poles 9th'STREET Remove 2 wooden poles 10th STREET Remove 2 poles 11th STREET Move 4 poles away, from homes 15th STREET Move 2 poles away from homes 17th STREET Remove 2 poles • 0 VOLLEYBALL REMOVAL /RELOCATION - Page 3 Between 19th & 20th Between 40th & 41st Between 41st & 42nd 53rd STREET 61st STREET Between FERN & GRANT Between GRANT & HIGHLAND Remove 1 pole Remove 2 poles Remove 2 poles Move to 55th Remove 2 poles Remove 1 pole Move 4 poles futher away from homes i Iv , • August 31, 1982 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PARKS, BEACHES AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT (714) 640 -2271 Dear Oceanfront Resident /Volleyball Player: A copy of the proposed resolution establishing.a policy for beach volleyball in Newport Beach is enclosed for your information. The Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission will ,review the proposed resolution at its September 7, 1982 meeting in the City Council Chambers, 3300 Newport Blvd., Newport Beach at 7:00 p.m. Public input is encouraged. Your interest and input at past meetings has helped formulate the enclosed policy. If you have any questions prior to the meeting, please call me at (714) 640 -2271. yf nfce C. Kolin Recreation Superintendent JCK:dob City Hall • 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California 92663 S'� 3 It is desirable to discuss with the Commission our tree trim- ming procedures. As most of you know, during the past two years we have improved our trimming cycle from three years to two years. This is a result of additional funding that allowed contract tree trimming to aid our overall operation. • Because of our new techniques, as described in the attached memo, we have trimmed some trees that were in an annual flower- ing condition. Assistance from the Commission and interested homeowners to develop policies that will satisfy all concerns on tree tirmming is being pursued. Ronald A. Whitley Director RAW:dob CITY OF NEWPORT BEACil Parks, Beaches & Recreation Department DATE: August 31, 1982 TO: PARKS; BEACHES F, RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: PARKS, BEACHES & RECREATION DIRECTOR SUBJECT: TREE TRIMMING PRACTICES It is desirable to discuss with the Commission our tree trim- ming procedures. As most of you know, during the past two years we have improved our trimming cycle from three years to two years. This is a result of additional funding that allowed contract tree trimming to aid our overall operation. • Because of our new techniques, as described in the attached memo, we have trimmed some trees that were in an annual flower- ing condition. Assistance from the Commission and interested homeowners to develop policies that will satisfy all concerns on tree tirmming is being pursued. Ronald A. Whitley Director RAW:dob `12 • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH OFFICE OF THE CITY•MANAGER August 10, 1982 TO: PARKS BEACHES AND RECREATION DIRECTOR FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: TREE TRIMMING PRACTICES During the City Council study session of August 9th, ( the City Council requested the P. B & R Commission to review the City's present policy on frequency and extent of tree trimming within the City. The Council suggested that in- terested persons from Homeowners' Associations in the Corona del Mar area and some specialists in parkway trees be in- volved in the review. The Council further suggested that possibly some species of trees could go longer then two years for trimming, while others may go two years or less. • This subject was prompted by complaints from Corona del Mar that the City was trimming too frequently and that the trimming coincided with the times in which the trees were in blossom and coincided with the times in which the nesting cycle of birds was occurring. Jack Brooks attended the City Council study session and will be able to provide valuable input as to the nature and extent of the City Council's concerns. CC: Jack Brooks, Park Supt. Ll ROBERT L. i • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Parks, Beaches & Recreation Department DATE: August 3, 1982• TO: Robert L. Wynn, City Manager FROM: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Director SUBJECT :Tree Trimming Progress Report STUDY SESSION NO. 7 For many years.our tree trimming procedures were to work four separate crews in four different locations. The crews were 2 man operations, one trimmer and one groundperson operating the brusher and clean -up. For efficiency pur- poses, we trimmed in a grid pattern which means an area was started and com- pleted with no loss of travel and set -up time. During the 1970's a high rate of residential development ocurred in the City and many street trees were planted. A vigorous street tree planting program was also encouraged in the older parts of the City during this period of time. During this residential growth period and'a natural factor of having the trees growing larger in the decade of the 70's presented this Department with a work problem. As no new staff had been authorized during this period we were faced with a situation of having a three year or longer time span between trimmings. The community response to this schedule indicated a need to improve. During the 1981 -82 fiscal year our budget was increased by $40,000 to provide assistance for tree trimming by private independent contract. This contract was awarded to Allied Tree Company, a well known large tree firm. In addition to this added resource, we studied their operation and developed an efficiency program based on their techniques to improve the capabilities of our staff. By combining our crews we are able to trim with fewer traffic problems, better supervision, fewer areas to clean up and have created a friendly competition amoung our tree trimmers. „ �. In developing a schedule to implement this new method of operation it was necessary to have our area crews finish a location and then be combined. In order to achieve the bringing together of the crews, it was necessary to dou- ble back to some areas sooner than normal. However, everything has now evened out and we are now on a two year cycle for trimming. This is satisfactory to the property owner and extremely good for the health of the tree. By-increasing our-production (30 %) we are also able to trim our trees located in parks as we reach an area. In the past, we only trimmed park trees when problems were identified. Our park trees are now getting much better care than in the past. As we have developed our' new procedures, trimming of the tree foliage is only the first step in our new operation. We long have been faced with extensive damage to side walks, curbs and gutters and in many cases damage to private' •property. All of this damage has been identified as resulting from the street tree root growth. Our second step will be to develop a preventative root prun- ing program that will decrease the costly concrete repair and liability. 14. Tree Trimming Progress Report - Page 2 • The more frequent trimming of the trees is very important in address4n9','.this problem for the following reasons: 1. Tree foliage and tree roots have a balancing of each other as the roots take in nutrients and water necessary for producing food for the tree. The food is manufactured by the foliage of the.tree and distributed to various parts of the plant as needed to maintain life and produce new growth which would include the new growth .of roots. In essence, the trimming of the tree is like puttinq'it on,'a diet. 2. We need to implement a preventitive root prunning'program. In order to root prune, the foliage should not be heavy and the tree should be laced out to allow air to flow through it. n LJ 3. When the roots are cut, the tree can not take in 'a'much water and nutrients as may be needed. Therefore, the foli'agA of the tree should be reduced to compensate for the loss of roots. It has been satisfying to get our tree operation into this work situation. We can look forward to trimming on a two year cycle, which is desirable by the property owner, and work aggresively toward eliminating root problems that have caused major problems during the past. c Parks, Beaches & Recreay$n Director • RAW /dob CL J August 3, 1982 M,•:,. Aliee I�e,,,e,• No 210 Goldenrod Avenue Loronn Del Jklm-, California 92625 Mayor Heather & N. B. City Council Newport Beach City Hall Newport Beach, CA 9/-663 Ladies and Gentlemen: ~ NFiv. err° OF �C AUG ..; . 1�82�. FgK The City has done a fine job of tree trimming in Corona del Mar. We are particularly pleased with the cutting of palm fronds on Goldenrod Ave, because the falling fronds were hazardous. There was a street however, which suffered from the pruning process being carried out at the wrong time. Narcissus Ave. with its magnificent flowering euca- lyptus trees, no longer exhibits its glorious foliage. It is sad to walk that street and see what a misguided adherence to a schedule has wrought. Common sense and certainly a sense of esthetics should have prevailed. Will the Council wisely direct that the next tree- trimming,schedule take into account the flowering period of some of the most beautiful trees along the Orange Coast? Sincerely yours, < Alice Reme�r • Date 9 SSENTTQ CO. C3 C cilmen anager 17 Attorney D Bldg. ir. Q timery Der. 86RDir. C3 Planning Oir. a Police Chief 0 P.W. Dir O Other .16 • DATE: TO: FROM: CITY OF 14EWPORT BEACFI Parks, Beaches & Recreation Department August 31, 1982 PARKS, BEACHES $ RECREATION COMMISSION PARKS, BEACHES & RECREATION DIRECTOR SUBJECT: ALTERNATE USES OF MARINAPARK MOBILE HOME PARK The attached material with the previously provided Marinapark Study of 1972 gives a good background of the subject property. As the leases expire in 1985 the requested study will provide important information and /or recommendations for Marinapark. As indicated, the Commission has been given a year to formulate the study of alternate uses. I would recommend that Chairman Stuart appoint a sub - committee to work with staff to develop a preliminary report that can be brought back to the Commission in three to four months. rtAlAa =1 Ronald A. Director RAW:dob • �7 17, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER August 24, 1982 TO: P, B & R DIRECTOR FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: STUDY OF ALTERNATE USES /MARINAPARK MOBILE HOME PARK On August,23rd the Newport Beach City Council directed the P, B & R Department /Commission to institute additional studies and prepare alternate uses for the Marinapark Mobile Home Park. As you know, the current leases extend through 1985. The study, therefore, should be complete for City Council review within one year. This should give ample time for the studies necessary to list feasible alternatives. The study, in addition to listing alternate land uses, should be specific in the follow- ing areas. -- 1. Capital costs to implement the,alternate land • use plans. 2. Maintenance and operation costs to maintain the alternate land use plans. 3. Estimated value of the current property. Attached, you will find a copy of the various reports that went tp the City Council on August 23rd. Attachment • ROBERT L' 6, City Council Meeting August 23, 1982 1] 0V Agenda Item No. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TO: City Council FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: Amendment No. 576 J -1 Request to consider an amendment to a portion of Districting Map No. 9 to reclassify the Marinapark Mobile Home Park site from the R -4 District and the Unclassified District to the R -4 /MHP District and the Unclassified /MHP District. LOCATION: The Marinapark Mobile Home Park property is located at-1770 West Balboa Boulevard, northerly of West Balboa Boulevard, between 15th Street and 18th Street on the Balboa Peninsula. ZONES: Unclassified APPLICANT: City of Newport Beach OWNER: Same as applicant Proposal It is proposed to change the zoning on the property from the Unclas- sified District to the Unclassified /MHP District. Amendment procedures are outlined in Chapter 20.84 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Planning Commission.Action and Recommendations At its meeting of August 5, 1982', the Planning Commission voted (5 Ayes, 1 Abstention and 1 Absent) to (1) disapprove Amendment No. 576, (2) to recommend to the City Council that the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission be directed to initiate additional studies and prepare a plan for the ultimate use of the site, and (3) to recommend that an amendment to the City's Local Coastal Program be initiated when feasible (that is, when a plan and a schedule for the redevelopment of the site has been adopted). Section 20.84.040 of the Municipal Code provides that if the Planning Commission disapproves an amendment application, no further action shall be taken unless an appeal, is filed in writing with the City •Council within twenty -one days after such disapproval. Since the City Council directed the Planning Commission to commence public hearings to determine the advisability of imposing the mobile home park overlay zone on the Marinapark property, and inasmuch as the Planning Commission has passed on to the City Council additional recom- 19 T0: City Council - 2'. •mendations regarding the Marinapark site, the Council may desire to call this matter up for review on its own motion, as provided for under Section 20.84.060. The last meeting that the City Council will have to consider setting a public hearing on the Planning, Commission's disapproval of Amendment No. 576 is August 23, 1982, If the City Council does not wish.to consider Amendment No. 576, it may still act on the Planning Commission's remaining Marinapark recommendations independent of Amendment No. 576, Attached for the information and review of the City Council is an excerpt from the Draft Planning Commission minutes of 'August 5, 1982, a copy of the Planning Commission staff report, and the recommendation of the Parks. Beaches and Recreation Commission.- Respectfully submitted', PLANNING DEPARTMENT A nS D. HEWICKER, Director JDH /kk Attachments for City Council only: 1) Excerpt of Planning Commission minutes 2) Planning Commission Staff Report 3) Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission Recommendations u 1 t a J u ATTACHMENT NO. 1 MINUTES August 5, 1982 of Newport Beach DRAFT INDEX Request to consider an amendment to a portion of Districting Map No. 9 to reclassify the Marinapark Mobile Home Park site from the Unclassified District to the Unclassified /MHP District. LOCATION: The Marinapark Mobile Home Park property, located at 1770 West Balboa Boulevard, northerly of West Balboa Item #2 AMENDMENT NO. 576 Boulevard, between 15th Street and 18th . � x � r m c m W 7C G) y D APPLICANT: City of Newport Beach u ATTACHMENT NO. 1 MINUTES August 5, 1982 of Newport Beach DRAFT INDEX Request to consider an amendment to a portion of Districting Map No. 9 to reclassify the Marinapark Mobile Home Park site from the Unclassified District to the Unclassified /MHP District. LOCATION: The Marinapark Mobile Home Park property, located at 1770 West Balboa Boulevard, northerly of West Balboa Item #2 AMENDMENT NO. 576 Boulevard, between 15th Street and 18th Street on the Balboa Peninsula. ZONE: Unclassified APPLICANT: City of Newport Beach DENIED OWNER: Same as applicant Planning Director Hewicker presented information on the most recent sales of coaches in the Marinapark Mobile Home Park. He stated that indications are that people are paying somewhere in the neighborhood of $75,000 to $90,000 as a lot premium for space in Marinapark, recognizing that the leases expire in 1985. He added that each individual sale and new lease has to be approved by the City Council. The public hearing opened in connection with this item and Mr. James Parker, 1201 Dove Street, representing the tenants of Marinapark Mobile Home Park, appeared before the Commission. Mr. Parker stated that this issue is virtually identical to that of the DeAnza Mobile Home Park issue. He stated that the overlay zone provides an added layer of protection for the actual residents of the mobile home park. Mr. Parker stated that in this particular case, the City of Newport Beach is the landowner. He stated that the overlay zone requires that a landowner who wishes to change a mobile home use to another use, must present a specific plan. He stated that this plan must go through the public hearing process and must allow for relocation assistance, as required by State law. He stated that the tenants of Marinapark are in favor of the overlay zone. -5- _ LUMMbNUNLKL MINUTES a August 5, 1982 3 � � r c • m ' m m H City of Newport Beach Commissioner Balalis asked how many full time tenants reside in Marinapark. Mr. Parker stated that of the 58 spaces in Marinapark, the staff report indicates that there are 23 permanent residents. Commissioner Balalis questioned the definition of a permanent resident. Mr. Parker stated that many tests have been applied to determine what constitutes a permanent resident, such as number of days a person sleeps in a given place, if the person is registered to vote at that location, or if the person's children attend school in the district. Mr. Parker stated that although Marinapark does not have a 100 percent occupied permanent residency, he stated that 50 percent of the people who signed their leases in 1973 with Marinapark, are still residing in the Park. He also stated that some of the tenants, which are not on a full -time basis, have resided at Marinapark for a cumulatively longer period than others, which indicates an on -going commitment. He stated that many of the permanent residents of Marinapark are senior citizens. Chairman King stated that he does not assess absentee owners as having any commitment to the City. He stated that if the absentee owners have an income generating piece of property, it is in their best interest to continuing renewing the lease year after year. Chairman. King stated that this issue and the DeAnza Mobile Home Park issue are significantly different, in that the landlords are different; one being the City, as opposed to a private landlord. He stated that this proposal would cause the City to take an action against itself, by adding another layer of both cost and time, when the area is public tidelands and has been planned L as public recreation open -space for some time. Mr. Parker stated that the City imposed this overlay zone protection for the tenants of the DeAnza Mobile - • Home Park and should provide the same protection for -6- ' COMMISSIONERS a� 0 � r c w m C 7 a -m ROLL CALL 0 MINUTES August 5, 1982 ity of Newport Beach the tenants of Marinapark. He stated that the City will undoubtedly require this layer of protection for the tenants of the other mobile home parks within the City and will impose this overlay zone on every private owner of mobile home parks in the City. He stated that because the City is the landowner in this particular case, the City should not be exempt from the overlay zone, which it imposes on private landowners. Commissioner Balalis stated that the Local Coastal Plan and the Housing Element designates this property as recreational and environmental open space. He stated that the other mobile home parks within the City do not have this designation. Therefore, he stated that a specific plan need not be developed for this property, as all of the documents indicate an existing plan for recreational and environmental open space on the Marinapark property. Mr. Parker stated that the current lease which exists between the City and the tenants of Marinapark, grants to the 'tenants the option to renew the term of the lease for an additional period of time, unless the City has decided and adopted a specific plan to use the tidelands for tideland purposes, or to use the Park for some other public purpose. He -stated that the City has retained for itself, the absolute right to control its desired use of the property. However, he stated that the City is required to formally adopt such a plan. He stated that the adoption of the mobile home overlay zone requires the City to adopt such a plan, Mr. Parker referred to a mobile home park in the Malibu area which was owned by a governmental entity. He stated that the leases were cancelled and-all of the tenants moved out, because the mobile home park was to be converted for public purposes. He stated that this occurred several years ago and the property still sits vacant, because the governmental entity did not have a specific plan for the property and did not go through the public hearing process. -7- INDEX August 5, 1982 r c m � m m y. City of Newport Beach Mr. Parker stated that the Marinapark property is valuable land and the mobile home park is a good interim use which meets a number of City policies, such as providing a variety of housing within the City. He stated that this is probably the closest to affordable housing within the City of Newport Beach. Chairman.King stated that a mobile home park is a good interim use of the property and that the City is committed to that use until the lease expires in 1985. Mr. Parker referred to the Marinapark Planning Study which he stated is 10 years old. He stated under the mobile home overlay zone, the City would be required to develop and adopt a specific plan which can be defined to the tenants of Marinapark before they are displaced and relocated. Commissioner Balalis stated that the tenants of Marinapark have a contractural agreement with the City for a specified amount of time in their lease until 1985 and a specified time of renewal for five years, unless the City takes other action. He stated that the placement of an overlay zone on Marinapark, accomplishes absolutely nothing for the tenants of Marinapark. He stated that the overlay zone provides protection for other mobile home park tenants, where the tenants do not have a specified length of time for occupancy. MINUTES INDEX 6. Mr. Parker stated that according to the terms of the i lease, the City Council could theoretically say that Marinapark is no-longer required for any public trust purpose or any other public purpose, and Marinapark would no-longer'be in existence after 1985. He stated that the imposition of the overlay zone on Marinapark would add more protection to the tenants of the Marinapark Mobile Home Park. He stated that the City should subject themselves to the same public hearing process, as any other landowner in the City would have to. Mr. Parker stated that the Local Coastal Plan only indicates that the Marinapark property will rezoned for an open space district. i -8- MINUTES INDEX 6. A . t w c m Qm� > >m ROLL CALL 1� m m D O .m � N � August 5, 1982 ity of Newport Beach Planning Director Hewicker stated that the LCP Land Use Plan contains language that the mobile home park will be retained and public access improved bayward of the mobile home park. He stated that prior to the time that the City can change the use of the property, public hearings would have to be held and it would have to be heard by the Coastal Commission, before the LCP .Land Use.Plan could be changed. Mr. Robert Burnham, Assistant City Attorney, referred to the gift of public funds issue and stated that if DeAnza Bayside wants to redevelop their property, they can fund the relocation, benefits, and compensation which would have to be paid to the existing tenants through the profits which would be derived from the redevelopment of the DeAnza property. He added that the City does not have this option, in this particular case. He stated that in the event the overlay zone is approved for Marinapark, the issue of the gift of public funds should be researched further. Mr. Tom Heinz, resident of 217 19th Street, appeared before the Commission and stated that the tenants of Marinapark are approaching the end of their ten year lease. He stated that there is a need for public use facilities in the area for boating purposes. He suggested that during the next two years, a solid proposal should be developed for this property. Commissioner Balalis expressed his concern with the metal posts which impede access to the area. Mr. Heinz concurred and stated that these should "be removed to improve public access. Ms. Rae Cohen, resident of 1501 Antigua Way, and Chairman of the Subcommittee for Marinapark for the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission, appeared before the Commission. Ms. Cohen stated that the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission voted 6 Ayes and 1 Abstention, that the request for a Mobile Home Park overlay zone for Marinapark be denied and that the Marinapark area be pursued for development as a marine and beach park. She stated that there is a great need for additional bay access for small boat launching in this area and dingy storage. She stated that this property should now be utilized for public purposes, since it has been leased property since 1955. -9- MINUTES ' C.UMMI551UNI:KS a5' x r o C 7c C y D - S a o — o 7 J A W N S • • August 5, 1982 of Newport Beach Commissioner Winburn .asked Ms. Cohen how the swimming beach and the small boat launching area between 18th and 19th Street is progressing. Ms. Cohen stated that this area is being utilized by the public, but the street ends are congested because there is not enough space for the boats and trailers to park. She stated that there are many residents of Newport Beach who desire access to the bay and the Marinapark property is a good location. Commissioner Balalis suggested that the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission also consider providing some type of housing for a mixed -use concept in this area. He expressed his concern for the tenants of Marinapark who have resided at the Park on a full time basis for at least the last five years. He suggested' that perhaps 25 residential units be.provided, along with the proper parking, and small boat launching facilities, which would constitute a multi -use facility. Commissioner Goff asked if a mobile home park is an appropriate use for tidelands trust land. Mr. Burnham stated that this question has been asked in the past. He stated that the answer depends upon the size of the parcel, the type of residential uses, and the duration of time involved. In response to a hypothetical question posed by Commissioner Goff, Mr. Burnham stated that if litigation in the future were determine that a mobile home park is not an appropriate use for tidelands trust land, the existing tenants would be given the right, over an extended period of time, to relocate. He also stated that such a litigation would be subject to appeal. Commissioner Kurlander stated that the California Civil Code requires a 12 -month notice for the change of use of a mobile home park. He stated that in the event of such a change, the tenants would be given a minimum 12- month notice. -10- MINUTES INDEX M01 ROLL i 11 0 • MISSIONERS August 5, 1982 of Newport Beach Mr. Parker stated that the City Council has determined several times in the past that a mobile home park is not an improper use of tidelands trust land. He stated that the gift of public funds issue is a legitimate question. However, he referred to the State Civil Code and stated that the City, as the mobile home park owner, may be required to provide compensation for relocation expenses for the tenants in the event that the mobile home park use is changed. Mr. Parker stated that the Marinapark property would be the worst place on the Peninsula to place a boat launching• facility, because of the already existing traffic congestion in the area. in summarizing, Mr. Parker stated that the Mobile Home Park overlay zone for Marinapark is a fair requirement for the City to impose on itself. He urged the Commission to adopt the overlay zone for Marinapark. Commissioner Winburn stated that as a past member of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission, many locations have been considered for a small boat launching facility on the bay. She stated that the Marinapark location is the only feasible location for the use of boat trailers and parking spaces. Mr. Parker stated that the parking and traffic congestion in this area will be staggering if boat launching facilities are provided at this location. He stated that boat launching facilities would be more feasible in the upper bay area. Commissioner King asked Mr. Parker if he would be agreeable to an overlay zone which would expire in five years. Mr. Parker stated that this would defeat the purpose of the overlay zone. He stated that the overlay zone requires that the landowner develop a specific plan for the property. He stated that a specific plan is what the tenants want. Commissioner King stated that he can not support an overlay zone which would dictate the City imposing another layer of government upon itself. He stated that in the case of a private developer in a private park, the money spent on the overlay zone is hopefully recaptured in the resulting redevelopment. -11- MINUTES INDEX � x � r c m m � - o August 5, 1982 of Newport Beach Mr. Parker stated that the City Council has determined several times in the past that a mobile home park is not an improper use of tidelands trust land. He stated that the gift of public funds issue is a legitimate question. However, he referred to the State Civil Code and stated that the City, as the mobile home park owner, may be required to provide compensation for relocation expenses for the tenants in the event that the mobile home park use is changed. Mr. Parker stated that the Marinapark property would be the worst place on the Peninsula to place a boat launching• facility, because of the already existing traffic congestion in the area. in summarizing, Mr. Parker stated that the Mobile Home Park overlay zone for Marinapark is a fair requirement for the City to impose on itself. He urged the Commission to adopt the overlay zone for Marinapark. Commissioner Winburn stated that as a past member of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission, many locations have been considered for a small boat launching facility on the bay. She stated that the Marinapark location is the only feasible location for the use of boat trailers and parking spaces. Mr. Parker stated that the parking and traffic congestion in this area will be staggering if boat launching facilities are provided at this location. He stated that boat launching facilities would be more feasible in the upper bay area. Commissioner King asked Mr. Parker if he would be agreeable to an overlay zone which would expire in five years. Mr. Parker stated that this would defeat the purpose of the overlay zone. He stated that the overlay zone requires that the landowner develop a specific plan for the property. He stated that a specific plan is what the tenants want. Commissioner King stated that he can not support an overlay zone which would dictate the City imposing another layer of government upon itself. He stated that in the case of a private developer in a private park, the money spent on the overlay zone is hopefully recaptured in the resulting redevelopment. -11- MINUTES INDEX a� CALL Motion Ayes Abstain Absent 71 MINUTES August 5, 1982 i x r m � m N. City of Newport Beach INDEX Planning Director Hewicker stated that the Commission may want to bring to the attention of the City Council the steps which would have to be taken in order for a new use to be considered before the termination of the lease in 1985. He suggested that perhaps the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission could be directed to initiate.the additional studies and come up with a plan and the Planning Department could then initiate an amendment to the LCP Land Use Plan when feasible. X Motion was made to recommend to the City Council that X X X X X Amendment No. 576, be denied and further recommended X that the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission be * directed to initiate the additional studies to come up with a plan for this area and the Planning Department could then initiate an amendment to the LCP Land Use Plan when feasible, which MOTION CARRIED, * a Request to permit the installation of outdoor lighting on 20 foot high standards in conjunction with an existing tennis court in the R -1 -B -2 District. LOCATION: A portion of Lot 287, Newport Heights \ Tract, located at 2321 22nd Street on USE PERMIT the southerly side of 22nd Street, NO. 2082 between Irvine Avenue and Tustin Avenue. ZONE: R -1 -B -2 APPLICANT: er Luby, Newport Beach APPROVED CONDI- OWNER: Same a applicant ITIONALLY Mr. Robert Burnham, Assista t City Attorney, stated that although Commissioner Goff as not member member of the Commission at the time this item s first introduced on the Agenda, he stated that Cc ioner Goff would • be eligible to vote upon this item, bec a he has read the previous staff reports on this matter. -12- r� a a� Planning Cc mission MeetingAuqust 5, 1982 v Agenda Item No. 2 • ATTACHMENT N0. 2 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: Amendment No. 576 (Public Hearing) Request to consider an amendment to a portion of Districting Map No. 9 to reclassify the Marinapark Mobile Hone Park site from the R -4 District and the Unclassified District to the R -4 /MHP District and the Unclassified /MHP District. LOCATION: The Marinapark Mobile Home Park property is located at 1770 West Balboa Boulevard, northerly of West Balboa Boulevard, between 15th Street and 18th Street on the Balboa Peninsula. ZONES: R -4 and Unclassified APPLICANT: City of Newport Beach OWNER: Same as applicant • Proposal It is proposed to change the zoning on the property from the R -4 District and the Unclassified District to the R -4 /MHP District and Unclassified /MHP District. Amendment procedures are outlined in Chapter 20.84 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Suggested Action Hold hearing; close hearing; if desired, Recomnnnd to the City Council that Amendment No. 576, reclassifying the Marinapark Mobile Horn Park site from the Unclassified District to the Unclassified /MHP District be approved. Since the time of the legal notice and first staff report additional project review has occurred. It was determined that the R -4 parcel is not a part of the mobile horn park and should not be included in the reclassification. The suggested action has-been prepared to reflect this determination. Environmental Significance • This project has been reviewed and it has been determined that it is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (Section 15079.3). CDQA does not apply to activities and approvals by any local government, as defined in Section 30109 of the Public Resources Code, necessary for the preparation and adoption of a local coastal L�? / - TO: Planning Commission - 2 • program pursuant to the California Coastal Act (oamiencing with Section 30000 of the Public Resources Code). Conformance with the General Plan Land Use Element. The Land Use Element of the General Plan (Pg. 19) designates the site as "Recreational and Environmental Open Space with the following discussion of the Mobile Hare Park site. " Marinapark shall continue as a mobile home park until such time as that use is phased out, at which time the property shall be rezoned to the OS - Open Space - District." The proposed rezoning will prohibit redevelopment of the mobile hone park and insure the continued use of the property as a,mobile home park until such time as the MHP designation is removed. when the MHP Zone is removed the site can be redeveloped and reclassified to Open Space as stated in the Land Use Element. Therefore, application of the Mobile Home overlay Zone to this site is consistent with the Land Use Element. Housing Element. The Housing Element discussion of mobile home parks (Pp. 45 -48) consists of a general overview of the City's mobile hone parks, the tenants living in mobile home parks, and the cost of mobile here housing. An analysis of housing costs shows that a mobile hone can be a source of housing for lea and moderate inane households who have owned their mobile hares for several years. However, if mobile hone prices such as those observed in 1981 and discussed in the Housing Element prevail the cost of a mobile hone will exceed the affordability ranges of low and moderate income households. Housing Element Objective 7 which is aimed at pramting and assisting the development of housing for low and moderate incare households has an implementation action directed towards mobile home parks. Implementation Action 7e states that the City will preserve mobile home park land uses through the establishment of a mobile here park zone. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Housing Element objective. Recreation and Open Space Element. The Recreation and open Space Element (Pg. 17) states that the Balboa Peninsula is not considered to be deficient in terms of parks. However, the Element also identifies the existing Las Arenas Park for expansion and development as a marine - oriented park. A concept plan for the redevelopment of Marinapark /Las Arenas Park was approved by the City Council in June of 1972. Appling the Mobile Hare Zone to the Marinapark Mobile Home Park would not preclude the removal of the mobile home park and the implementation of a redevelopment plan. Therefore, the application of the mobile here zone to this site is not inconsistent with the Recreation and Open Space Element. Marinapark Planningr Studv • A comprehensive planning study for the Marinapark site was prepared for the City Council- and the Parks, Beaches, and Recreation Commission in 1972. •A copy of this study was attached to the June 10, 1982 staff report which discussed the setting of this item for ,public hearing. If additional copies of this study are needed they are available at the Planning Department. The plan recomiended that the mobile home park be phased out and a Newport /-�Z., TO: Planning Cannission - 3 •Peninsula Tennis and Aquatic Center be established, including the following elements: 1. Open Space Vista and Harbor Green 2. Night - lighted Tennis Courts 3. Tennis Center Parking Facilities 4. Tot Lot 5. Aquatic Sailing Center 6. Public Restroan 7. Basketball Courts 8. Volleyball Courts 9. Community Meeting Room Patio (between the existing buildings) 10. Bicycle Paseo Link 11. Small Boat Regatta Staging Area 12. Public Parking Facilities 13. Expanded Sand Beach At the May 10 City Council meeting the Council requested that the Parks, Beaches, and Recreation Catmission evaluate alternative proposals for the mobile hare park such as those discussed in the 1972 Marinapark Planning Study. The Planning Department staff will be meeting with the Parks, Beaches, and Recreation Catmission on Tuesday, August 3rd-and report their findings and reconnendations to the Planning Carmission at the August 5th meeting. Land Use Plan of the Local Coastal Program The Development Policies and Land Use Plan (LUP) of the Local Coastal Program discuss the Marinapark Mobile Home Park (Pg. -42). The mobile bane park portion of the site is designated for "Recreational and Environmental Open Space" uses. In addition, the LUP states that it is the intent of the City to preserve the mobile ham park use as a means of providing a variety of housing opportunities within the City. Therefore, the proposed rezoning is consistent with the Land Use Plan of the Local Coastal Program. Tidelands Trust The Marinapark site consists of approximately 5 acres of tidelands and submerged lands granted to the City of Newport Beach by the State of California on May 25, 1919 and April 5, 1927. On May 29, 1929, this grant was amended by the ,State of California to set our provisions relating to the granting of franchises upon or leases of these certain tidelands. An additional portion of the property was acquired from the Pacific Electric Land Company on July 7, 1919. In 1972, the City Attorney give the opinion that residential uses are appropriate uses of the tidelands trust. At the time the leases have been granted or extended, the City Council has made the determination that the leases are not inconsistent with the trust purposes imposed upon public tidelands. Also, it has been found that the leases are not in violation of •the gift clause of the State Constitution and that they complied with the Charter of the City of Newport Beach. Litigation has resulted in opinions that only those residential uses in which there is a general, state -wide interest would be consistent with the trust obligations. The June 10 staff report mentioned hotels or motels as a residential use with •statewide 13 5/ , TO: ' Planning Commission - 4 •interest. In addition, recent legislation (AB 2853 Housing Elements) and litigation has established that there is a state -wide interest in the supply of housing particularly housing affordable to low and moderate income households. Therefore, the acceptability of long tern, private residential uses on this site is not clear. Background on May 10, 1982, the City Council directed the,Planning Commission to co mience public hearings to determine the advisability of imposing the mobile home park zone on Marinapark. At the June 10, 1982 Planning Commission meeting the Cammission set the reclassification of the Marinapark Mobile Hone Park for public hearing on August 5, 1982. The Mobile Home Park (MHP) zone as adopted is an overlay zone designed to be applied to existing mobile hone parks in conjunction with an underlying primary zoning designation. The MHP zone requires' that a minintun of six (6) criteria be taken into consideration to determine whether the MOP Zone is appropriate for the property. Those criteria are as follows: a) Existing zoning and General Plan designations. b) The age and condition of the mobile hams park. c) The relationship of the mobile hams park to surrounding land uses. d) Vehicle access to the area under consideration. e) Site area. f) Site configuration. These items are discussed in the site discussion section of this report. When a property is zoned MHP none of the uses allowed by the underlying zoning are permitted. However, the MHP zone does contain a section which allows for the removal of the overlay zone provided that several findings are made by the City. Those findings are as follows: a) That the proposed zoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of,Newport Beach and all elements thereof, and in the event that the proposed zoning is P-C, that the Planned Community Development Plan has been submitted and is consistent with the General Plan and all elements thereof; b) That the property which is the subject of the zoning amendment would be more appropriately developed in accordance with uses permitted by the underlying zoning, or proposed zoning, and if the underlying zoning or proposed zoning is P-C, that a Planned Cc m uiity Development Plan has been submitted and the property would be more appropriately developed with the uses specified in that plan; 0, c) That a mobile home park phaseout plan has been prepared, reviewed and considered and found to be acceptable. A phaseout plan shall not be found to be acceptable unless it includes (1) a time schedule and method by which existing mobile homes, cabanas, ramadas and other substantial improvements and tenants, are to be relocated or appropriately oompensated; (2) methods of lie TO: Planning Commission - 5 3� mitigating the housing impacts on tenants having low and moderate inns, elderly tenants and tenants who are handicapped; (3) the programs or other means that are to be implemented such that the housing impacts on those described in (2), above, are mitigated. For purposes of this provision, low and moderate incares" shall be defined in accordance with the provisions of the Housing Element of the City of Newport Beach. Removal of the overlay MHP zone would permit development of the property with those uses allowed by the primary zoning and the General Plan or Land•Use Plan of the Local Coastal Program. Site Discussion As previously discussed the proposed zone is consistent with the Land Use Plan of the Local Coastal Program and the Land Use, Housing, and Recreation and Environmental Open Space Elements of the General Plan. The proposed MHP Zone is also compatible with the primary underlying Unclassified zoning. The Marinapark Mobile Have Park is located on the North side of West Balboa Boulevard between 15th Street and 18th Street. This park is rectangular in shape with no apparent features detracting from its use as a mobile hire park. The Park has adequate vehicle access from both West Balboa Boulevard and 18th Street. or The property is approximately 5 acres in size, has 60 spaces and is developed at 12.0 units per acre. Information provided by park management in January of 1982 for the annual State'Department of Finance population estimate indicated that 23 of the spaces were occupied by permanent residents. The permanent resident population at that time was 36 persons or approximately 1.6 persons per household. The mobile home park was developed by the City of Newport Beach in 1955. The Park is managed by the City with individual tenants leasing their space from the City. The current lease was negotiated in March of 1976 and terminates in September of 1985. Space rents range from $308 to $366 per month. The park and mobile hares are generally in good condition with no signs of deterioration or neglect. The mobile hare park is not out of character with the area. The Park is surrounded with residential, recreational and visitor - serving facilities. Since the Park is occupied by both full -time and part-time residents it functions as a source of resident housing and as a visitor - serving facility. It is expected that the MHP zone will preserve the mobile hire park use until such time as the MHP designation is removed. It should be noted that application of the MHP zone to the property may enhance the sale of individual mobile hares because of a perceived assurance of a continued mobile hire park use. The possible increase in the sale price of individual mobile homes may increase housing costs beyond the affordability ranges of low and moderate • /S- l t 33 TO: Planning Catmi.ssion - 6 • inconm households. Both existing and, future tenants of the mobile home park should be aware of the provision of the mobile bare park zone and take them into consideration. senior f CTB:nma Attachments: 1. •map 2. Mobile Hans Park Zone • 1( 7 i I i i • H I I ALhMtN 1 1 O/ •dv . /bw °./t� S N 0�V Qr I 1S N / O H1 ar 'ry ✓Q o Q � ` m 4. l� IL h y V � 7 It 11W IL A • bcb �_? , a B4✓B 37Y)G• Off' /J rv�: n� V6iC ° °nMjap N3 � ^• b^s yy �F xi....S ru > � o � ^rte' a_• �E K? u s Qd add OH 6 AIR Z :d Og N O 0 x a 6 n A V ^ 3 a Q Z � s v <_ QO W Wjii U. Z� L _ S � UQ <J V I Q a U J J} m Q�N a Vlj Y O G V � A O$ y� L W 3S ATTACHMENT i Page 63 -1 MOBILE HOW, PARK DISTRICP Chapter 20.20 M O B I L E HOME P ARK S Chapter 20.20 MOBILE HOME PARRS Sections: 20.20.010 Intent 20.20.020 Definitions 20.20.030 Criteria for Application of Zone 20.20.040 Uses Permitted 20.20.050 Reroval of the Mobile Hare Park overlay Zone 20.20.010 INV=. The Mobile Hare Park Residential Zone is hereby established as an overlay zone to permit the application of a mobile bare zone to parcels of land developed with mobile home parks and zoned with a Primary underlying zoning designation. The purpose of the mobile hare park zone is'to designate existing mobile home parks in appropriate locations for mobile home park uses in order that these uses may be encouraged, maintained, and protected. The regulations of this district are designed to, achieve an enviznnment of stable, desirable residential character and preserve areas or communities developed with mobile hone residential uses. Whenever reference is made in this section or on any districting maps to MHP, this shall mean Mobile Hare Park Overlay Zone. 20.20.020 DEFINITIONS. As used in this Chapter•, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated:. (a) Mobile hare - "Mobile home" is a structure transportable on a street or highway by authorization or a per in one or more sections designed and equipped for human habitation to be used with or without a foundation system. Mobile home includes manufactured homes but does not include recreation vehicles, comrercial coaches, or factory - built housing. (b) Mobile have park - "Mobile hare-park" is any area of land used primarily for the placing, parking or storage of two or more mobile homes for housekeeping, sleeping or living quarters. (c) Mobile hare space - "Mobile hare space" is any area, . tract of land, site, lot, pad or portion of a mobile home Park designated or used for the occupancy of one mobile hare. 0 3� Page 63 -2 MOBILE. HOME PARK • DISTRICP Chapter 20.20 20.20.030 CRITERIA FOR APPLICATION OF ZCNE. The City Council, in making its determination whether to apply the MPH zone to any particular Property, shall consider the following factors in making its determination as to whether the MHP zone is appropriate for the property: (a) Existing zoning and General Plan designations. (b) The age and condition of the mobile hone park. (c) The relationship of the mobile home park to surrounding land uses. (d) Vehicle access to the area under consideration. (e) site area. (f) site configuration. 20.20.040 USES PERMl=. (a) Mobile home parks as regulated by the State of California. .. (b) Accessory uses and structures incidental to the operation of mobile home parks such as recreation facilities and /or eomm =ty centers of a non- eommxcial nature, either public or private, storage facilities for the use of the mobile hone park residents and any other uses or structures that are incidental to the operation of a mobile home park. (c) Whenever property is zoned M1 1P, any use permitted by the underlying zoning of such property shall not be permitted. 20.20.050 R040vAL OF THE MOBILE ROME PARK OVERLAY ZONE, The City Council shall not approve a zoning attendmatt for any parcel, which amendment would have the effect of removing the W designation from that property, unless the following findings have been made: (a) That the proposed zoning is consistent with the General Plan Of the City of Newport Beach and all elements thereof, and in the event that the proposed zoning is P-C, that the Planned Cm=mi.ty Development Plan has been submitted and is consistent with the General Plan and all elements thereof; (b) That the Property which is the subject of the zoning amembrant would be more appropriately developed in accordance with uses permitted by the underlying zoning, or proposed zoning, and if the underlying zoning or proposed zoning is • P-C, that a Planned Community. Developnent Plan has been submitted and the property would be more appropriately developed with the uses specified in that plan; /9 .0 \I-_ • Page 63 -3 XMILE HOMP PARK DISP cr Chapter 20.20 (c) That a mobile hams park phaseout plan has been prepared, reviewed and considered and found to be acceptable. A phaseout plan shall not be found to be acceptable unless it includes (1) a time schedule and method by which existing mobile homes, cabanas, ramadas and other substantial improvements and tenants, are to be relocated or appropriately coctgoensated; (2) methods'of mitigating the housing impacts on tenants having low and moderate inccues, elderly tenants and tenants who are handicapped; (3) the programs or other means that are to be implerented such that the housing igQacts on those described in (2),- above, are mitigated. For purposes of this provision, "low and moderate incomes" shall be defined in accordance with the provisions of the Housing Element of the City of Newport Beach. (Adopted by Ord. 1894,; 'January 11, 1982). 40 l•; ,J At � � +\per � 1. y •j rn l c, =fe117L 42 - Amei -rI Lo /tt N0, 57& CITY'OF NEWPORT BEACH PARKS, BEACHES AND RECREATION COMMISSION TO: PLANNING ATTACHMENT N0. 3 August 4, 1982 FROM: PARKS, BEACHES AND RECREATION COMMISSION SUBJECT: APPLICATION OF THE MOBILE HOME PARK OVERLAY ZONE TO 14ARINAPARK RECOMMENDATION• Deny the request for a Mobile Home Park overlay zone for Marina - park and; pursue returning this valuable and highly desirable public resource to public use at the expiration of the existing leases which terminate in 1985. DISCUSSION: The Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission at their meeting of August 3, 1982 reviewed the request, as presented by the Planning Department, for the application of a Mobile Home Park Overlay Zone to Marinapark. Included in this review was the concept of alternative land uses as proposed in the Marinapark Planning Study prepared by the City in 1971. By unanimous vote with one abstension the Commission approved the listed recommen- dation. As City owned public tidelands it was felt by the.Commission that for over 30 years the Marinapark properly has been used by a relative few tenants many, perhaps over half, that are not even permanent residents, it was further recommended that the City develop the land into a City -owned and operated marine and beach park. This concept would include consideration for much needed public amenities such as a small boat launching area, small boat storage, parking and public recreation programs. The Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission strongly urges that their recommendation be given consideration. Bruce Stuart, Chairman Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission BS /dob RECREATION DIVISION • PROGRESS REPORT AUGUST 1982 YOUTH AND ADULT SPORTS August is the month when summer leagues are wrapped up. All leagues were completed and in most cases the winning team had a choice of trophies, pen set or athletic bag for awards. The adult basketball program went very smoothly and communication was very good with the school district so that gym cancellations were avoided. The only problem the adult soft- ball program experienced was grass that was too tall, the district's mowers broke down for a month. The Annual Beach Volleyball Tournament held at Corona del May State Beach was very successful. 155 teams registered for the "A" and "Novice" tournaments. The First Annual 18 and Under Tournament For Boys and Girls had 46 teams compete which was a very good turn out. The King of New- port Beach Softball Tournament was the summer finale for 20 of our summer softball teams. They played a double elimination tournament to determine a minor division and major division champion. Youth Flag Football will start September 13 at six locations throughout • the City. Sign ups are now being accepted in the office. SPECIAL ACTIVITY CLASSES Our summer classes enjoyed a very successful summer. Revenue was up by 35 %. Even the new Day Camp program ended up making a small profit. Our contract teachers, supervisors and Day Camp leaders all deserve a fine round of applause for a job well done. Tennis classes continued to reverse their trend of decreasing revenues with a 24% increase in revenue over last summer. Linda Newby and her tennis teacher did ,a fine job this summer with the tennis program. Fall brochures were mailed to all residents the last week of August. Mail -in registration begins September 3. Don't miss out on a fall class! SENIOR CITIZENS OASIS celebrated its Sth birthday on August 28. Supervisor Tom Riley highlighted a long list of dignitaries at the celebration. He present- ed a resoultion from the Orange County Board of Supervisors praising the fine programs and services at OASIS. Those in attendance enjoyed a hobby show, live entertainment, cake, tournaments and a barbeque lunch. The new parking lot is open and well used by seniors at the center. A *new shed for gardeners was also set -up. The next project is construction of a darkroom. Things are moving along at OASIS Center. �5 SAILING AND AQUATICS ADThe swimming programs at Corona del Mar and Harbor High schools were quite successful this summer. The number of classes offered were re- duced but revenue increased over last summer. Sailing programs did well again this summer but didn't quite reach the phenominal levels of last summer. The Annual Bellyflop Contest drew front page coverage in the local newspapers. All in all it was quite a summer. MISCELLANEOUS The Community Youth Center program was revitalized this summer and experienced an increase in attendance. Weekly special events, movies, overnights, cookouts and field trips all helped make the summer special at C.Y.C. Coming up in September and October aie a new musical "Camelot ", City Championship Golf Tournament,, 5 Mile Run in Corona del Mar and an Arts Commission Fall Concert at Eastbluff Park. • <5 A (t4L JeV,t�yew G. Kolin, Recreation Supertindent 11