HomeMy WebLinkAbout03 - Ord 2009-10 - CalPERS Contract Amendment - LifeguardsCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item No. 3
May 12, 2009
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Human Resources Department
Terri L. Cassidy, Human Resources Director
949 - 644 -3300, tcassidv(o)-city.newport- beach.ca.us
SUBJECT: Ordinance to Approve an Amendment to CaIPERS Contract to
Provide CaIPERS Retirement formula (3 % @50)
for Lifeguard Safety Employees per ratified Memorandum of
Understanding (July 2006 - December 2008)
ISSUE:
Shall the City approve an Amendment to the Contract between the City Council of the
City of Newport Beach and the Board of Administration of the California Public
Employees' Retirement System to implement the 3 % @50 retirement formula for
Lifeguard Safety Employees as previously authorized by the Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) approved by City Council in 2007?
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Ordinance No. 2009 -10, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Newport
Beach Authorizing an Amendment to the Contract between the City Council of the City
of Newport Beach and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees'
Retirement System.
DISCUSSION:
Background:
On April 14, 2009, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2009 -18 and introduced
Ordinance No. 2009 -10 to approve this contract amendment. There must be a minimum
of 20 days between adoption of the Resolution and adoption of the Ordinance, and final
action may be taken at this meeting.
Implementation of CaIPERS Retirement formula
(3 % @50) for Lifeguard Safety Employees
May 12, 2009
Page 2
During the April 14, 2009 City Council meeting, Rick Santos, Senior Actuary who
prepared the CalPERS actuarial report on the 3 % @50 retirement benefit for the
lifeguard unit answered questions from Council regarding the costs. Mr. Santos
indicated the estimated cost to implement the 3 % @50 retirement benefit for FY 2009 -10
was $135,000 which was based on preliminary budget projections provided by staff. In
the 2007 negotiation process with Lifeguard Management (LMA), staff provided Council
with a cost estimate of $43,000 - $48,000 to implement the retirement benefit. This
estimate was for the second six (6) months of FY 2008 -09 when the plan was
scheduled to be implemented and was based on FY 2006 data. Since the meeting of
April 14, staff has refined the preliminary projected Safety salaries (based upon the
current employee profile) and applied the FY 09/10 Safety PERS retirement rate to the
projected Safety salaries for FY 2009 -10 and estimates the cost increase for this benefit
to be $127,977 for next fiscal year. Funds for this benefit increase are provided for in
the Proposed FY 2009 -10 Budget.
If adopted, the Ordinance may take effect no less than 30 days later. The effective date
of the ordinance will be June 11, 2009. The effective date of the contract amendment
must be the first day of a payroll period and may not be earlier than the day after the
effective date of the Ordinance. The effective date of the CalPERS contract amendment
would be June 20, 2009.
Environmental Review:
Not applicable.
Public Notice:
This agenda item may be noticed according to the Ralph M. Brown Act (72 hours in
advance of the public meeting at which the City Council considers the item).
Funding Availability:
Funding for the Lifeguard Safety employees contract amendment has been accounted
for in the proposed Fire Department FY 2009 -10 budget.
Pre red by: Submitted by:
olyn Bo and Terri L. Cassidy
Human Resources Manager Human Resources Director
• CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item No. 23
April 14, 2009
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Human Resources Department
Terri L. Cassidy, Human Resources Director
949- 644 -3300, tcassidy(a)city.newport- beach.ca.us
SUBJECT: Implementation of CaIPERS Retirement formula (3 % @50)
for Lifeguard Safety Employees per ratified Memorandum of
Understanding (July 2006 - December 2008)
ISSUE:
• Shall the City authorize an Amendment to the Contract between the City Council of the
City of Newport Beach and the Board of Administration of the California Public
Employees' Retirement System to implement the 3 % @50 retirement formula for
Lifeguard Safety Employees as previously authorized by the Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) approved by City Council in 2007?
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Resolution 2009 -_ (Attachment 1) relating to the City's Intention to Approve
an Amendment to the Contract between the Board of Administration, California
Public Employees' Retirement System (CaIPERS) and the Newport Beach City
Council to authorize a "3 % @50" retirement formula for specified Lifeguard Safety
employees within the Fire Department.
2. Introduce Ordinance No. 2009- (Attachment II), an Ordinance of the City
Council of the City of Newport Beach Authorizing an Amendment to the Contract
between the City Council of the City of Newport Beach and the Board of
Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System, and pass to
second reading on May 12, 2009.
n
U
Implementation of Ca1PERS Retirement formula
(3 % @50) for Lifeguard Safety Employees
April 14, 2009
Page 2 •
DISCUSSION:
Background:
In May 2006 the City's negotiation team began to Meet and Confer in good faith with the
Lifeguard Management Association (LMA) pursuant to Government Code Section 3500
et. seq, (Meyers - Milias -Brown Act) on wages, benefits, hours and terms and conditions
of employment. In January 2007, tentative agreement was reached following intense
negotiations including a LMA declared impasse and the use of a mediator from State
Mediation and Conciliation Service. This agreement was reached only after City
Council, on January 23, 2007, authorized the City's negotiating team to offer the
3 % @50 retirement benefit. On March 13, 2007, City Council approved a MOU with the
LMA which states on page 16 (Attachment III), that the City would implement the
3 % @50 retirement program no later than December 31, 2008 (at the end of the
contract). Th a rationale for the 3 % @50 retirement benefit was that it be given in
exchange for reduced salary adjustments in 2007 and 2008 and to make these
employees comparable to other Newport Beach City sworn safety units (Police /Fire),
and the majority of their lifeguard counterparts in Southern California. Newport Beach
Police safety received the 3 % @50 formula in 2002 and Fire safety in 2007. •
The implementation date for the 3 % @50 retirement benefit with LMA has been delayed
due to the unexpected and extended absence of the Human Resources staff member
who is customarily responsible for Labor Relations and in order to comply with Senate
Bill 1123 (effective January 1, 2009) requiring actuarial input at City Council meetings.
According to the actuarial valuation (Attachment IV) provided by PERS in 2008
(actuarials are required close to the date of implementation), implementing the 3 %@50
formula for lifeguards will increase the CalPERS "employer rate" (what.the City pays as
a percentage of payroll) for all safety employees .395% (in other words, adding .395%
to the 28.760% safety rate for Fiscal Year 2010). The Administrative Services
Department has estimated the dollar cost of bringing Lifeguards up to the agreed -upon
retirement will be $182,553 for FY 2009 -2010. In subsequent years, the cost increase is
approximately $161,977 based upon any future adjustments to salaries.
Senate Bill 1123, approved by the legislature on September 27, 2008 and effective
January 1, 2009, requires that "... local legislative bodies, ... when considering changes
in retirement benefits or other post employment benefits, shall secure the services of an
actuary to provide a statement of the actuarial impact upon future annual costs,
including normal costs and any additional accrued liability, before authorizing changes
in the public retirement plan benefit or other post - employment benefits." To comply with
the new law, Richard Santos, the Senior Actuary who prepared the report will be
present to answer questions regarding Ca1PERS actuarial report on the 3 % @50 •
O
Implementation of Ca1PERS Retirement formula
(3 0/6@50) for Lifeguard Safety Employees .
April 14, 2009
• Page 3
retirement benefit for the Lifeguard unit. Mr. Santos is the actuary for all Orange County
Public Agencies and is very familiar with Newport Beach's rates.
CalPERS requires that clearly defined procedures be followed for contract
amendments. Following are the guidelines provided by CalPERS in order to complete
the contract amendment process:
A Resolution of Intention must be approved by the City Council (April 14, 2009
City Council Meeting), and a first reading of the Ordinance authorizing an
amendment to the contract must occur (April 14, 2009 City Council Meeting).
A final reading of the Ordinance (May 12, 2009 City Council Meeting) and a City
Council vote for or against adoption must take place. If adopted, the Ordinance
may take effect no less than 30 days later. The effective date of the ordinance
will be June 11, 2009.
• The effective date of the contract amendment must be the first day of a payroll
• period and may not be earlier than the day after the effective date of the
Ordinance. The effective date of the CalPERS contract amendment would be
June 20, 2009.
It is certainly a different fiscal climate as this item is being presented from back in March
2007 when City Council agreed to the 3 % @50 retirement plan for LMA. However, the
City's Meet and Confer process and State law were adhered to and the past contractual
obligations were entered into in "good faith" by the authorized bargaining
representatives empowered to do so. LMA has received lower salary adjustments (2%
lower in 2007 and 1% in 2008) than the Police Department employees received in
exchange for this retirement benefit. Similar lower salary adjustments were negotiated
with Police and Fire safety when they received this retirement benefit.
Environmental Review:
Not applicable
Public Notice:
This agenda item may be noticed according to the Ralph M. Brown Act (72 hours in
advance of the public meeting at which the City Council considers the item).
Funding Availability:
Ll
Attachment II
ORDINANCE NO. 2009-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF •
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY
AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT
SYSTEM
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach, California, HEREBY
ORDAINS as follows:
SECTION 1: That the Amendment to the contract between the City of Newport Beach and
the Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System is hereby
authorized, a copy of said Amendment being attached hereto, marked "Exhibit", and by
such reference made a part hereof as though set out in full.
SECTION 2: The Mayor of the City of Newport Beach is hereby authorized,
empowered and directed to execute said Amendment for and on behalf of the City.
SECTION 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is,
for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the
validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council
hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance, and each section, subsection, .
clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections,
subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases be declared unconstitutional.
SECTION 4: This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption, and
prior to expiration of fifteen (15) days from the passage thereof shall be published once
in the Daily Pilot, a newspaper of general circulation, published in Costa Mesa and
circulated in the City of Newport Beach, and thenceforth and thereafter shall be in full
force and effect.
SECTION 5: This ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Newport Beach, held on the _ day of 2009, and adopted on the
— day of , 2009, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES, COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES, COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
I
Ca1PERS
EXHIBIT
California
Public Employees' Retirement System
AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT
Between the
Board of Administration
California Public Employees' Retirement System
and the
City Council
City of Newport Beach
' The Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System, hereinafter
referred to as Board, and the governing body of the above public agency, hereinafter
referred to as Public Agency, having entered into a contract effective July 1, 1945, and
witnessed April 27, 1945, and as amended effective March 1; 1948, November 1, 1951,
April 1, 1956, October 31, 1970, September 18, 1971, December 11, 1971, September 24,
1977, December 18, 1977, June 17, 1978, March 24, 1979, June 30, 1979, January 12,
1989, December 2, 1989, June 12, 1996, July 12, 2000, August 26, 2000,.June 15, 2002,
November 30, 2002, November 13, 2004, July 23, 2005, December 22, 2007 and March 15,
2008 which provides for participation of Public Agency in said System, Board and Public
Agency hereby agree as follows:
A. Paragraphs 1 through 14 are hereby stricken from said contract as executed effective
March 15, 2008, and hereby replaced by the following paragraphs numbered 1
through 13 inclusive:
All words and terms used herein which are defined in the Public Employees'
Retirement Law shall have the meaning as defined therein unless otherwise
specifically provided. "Normal retirement age" shall mean age 55 for local
miscellaneous members and age 50 for local safety members.
2. Public Agency shall participate in the Public Employees' Retirement System
' from and after July 1, 1945 making its employees as hereinafter provided,
members of said System subject to all provisions of the Public Employees'
Retirement Law except such as apply only on election of a contracting agency
and are not provided for herein and to all amendments to said Law hereafter
enacted except those, which by express provisions thereof, apply only on the
election of a contracting agency.
Attachment IV
CONTRACT AMENDMENT COST ANALYSIS - VAWATION BASIS: June 30, 2007
SAFETY PLAN FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH •
Employer Number: 60
Benefit Description: Section 21362.2, 3% @ 50 Full Formula for Local Safety Members (Safety Lifeguards Only)
Actuarial Cost Estimates in General
What will this amendment cost? Unfortunately, there is no simple answer. There are two major reasons for the
complexity of the answer:
Rrst, all actuarial calculations, Including the ones In this cost estimate are based on a lot of assumptions
about the future — demographic assumptions about the percentage of your employees that will terminate,
die, become disabled, and retire in each future year, and economic assumptions about what salary
Increases each employee receives and the most important assumption: what the assets at CaIPERS will
earn for each year into the future until the last dollar is paid to current members of your plan. While
CaIPERS has set these assumptions as our best estimate of the real future of your plan, it must be
understood that these assumptions are very long term predictors and will surety not be realized each year
as we go forward. For example, the asset earnings for the past 15 years at CalPERS have ranged from
-7.2% to 20.1 %, yet the 15 year compound return has been 10.4 %, well above our assumption.
• Second, the very nature of actuarial funding produces the answer to the question of amendment cost as
the sum of two separate pieces:
1. The increase in Normal Cost (i.e., the increase in future annual premiums in the absence of
surplus or unfunded liability) expressed as a percentage of total active payroll, and
2. The increase In Past Service Cost (i.e., Accrued Liability — representing the current value of the
increased benefit for all past service of current members) which is expressed as a lump sum dollar
amount. .
The cost is the sum of a percent of future pay and a lump sum dollar amount (the sum of an apple and an
orange if you will). To communicate the total cost, either the increase in Normal Cost (i.e., future percent
of payroll) must be converted to a lump sum dollar amount (in which case the result is called the increase
in the present value of benefits), or the Past Service Cost (i.e., the lump sum) must be converted to a
percent of payroll (in which case the result is the increase in the employer's rate). Converting the Past
Service Cost lump sum to a percent of payroll requires a specific amortization period. So, the new
employer rate can be computed in many different ways depending on how long one will take to pay for it.
And don't forget the first bullet point above; all of these results depend on all of the assumptions being
exactly realized.
Rate Volatility
As is stated above, the cost estimates supplied in this communication are based on a number of assumptions about
very long term demographic and economic behavior. Even if these assumptions are exactly realized (terminations,
deaths, disabilities, retirements, salary growth, and investment return) there will be differences on a year to year
basis. This year to year difference between actual experience and the assumptions is called gains and losses and
serve to raise or lower the employer's rates from year to year. So, the rates will bounce around, especially due to the
ups and downs of investment returns.
The volatility in annual employer rates may be affected by this amendment. The reason is that higher benefits and
earlier retirement ages require the accumulation of more assets per member earlier in their career. Rate volatility
can be measured by the ratio of plan assets to active member payroll. Higher asset to payroll ratios produce more
volatile employer rates. To see this, consider two plans, one with assets that are 4 times active member payroll, and
the other with assets that are 8 times active member payroll. In a given year, see what happens when assets rise or
fall 10% above or below the actuarial assumption. For the plan with a ratio of 4, this 10 percent gain or loss in .
assets is the same in dollars as 40% of payroll; and for the plan with a ratio of 8, this is equivalent to 80% of payroll.
If this gain or loss is spread over 20 years (and we oversimplify by ignoring interest on the gain or loss), then the
first plan's rate changes by 2% of pay while the second plan's rate changes by 4% of pay.
November 19, 2008 Page 1
• CONTRACT AMENDMENT COST ANALYSIS - VALUATION BASIS: June 30,2007
SAFETY PLAN FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Employer Number. 60
Benefit Description: Section 21362.2,3% @ 50 Full Formula for Local Safety Members (Safety Lifeguards Only)
When a plan is amended, liability changes but assets do not. In addition, the desired state Is to be 100% funded
(i.e., to bring assets to equal accrued liability). Therefore, we disclose the ratio of accruedbility to payroll rather
than assets to payroll as a measure of the plan's potential future rate volatility. The highefie ratio, the more
volatile the future rate may be. The table below contains these measures of potential future rate volatility.
As of June 30, 2007 Current Plan Post - Amendment
Accrued Liability $ 308,551,677 $ 309,338,753
Payroll 25,034,573 25,034,573
Volatility Index 12.3 12.4
It should also be noted that these ratios tend to stabilize as the plan matures. That is, all plans with no past service
start their lives with zero assets and zero accrued liability — and so asset to payroll ratio and liability to payroll ratio of
zero. However, as time goes by these ratios begin to rise and then tend to stabilize at some constant amount as the
plan matures. Higher benefit levels and earlier expected retirements produce higher constant future ratios. For
example, our miscellaneous plans have average ratios that range from 2.6% for 2% @ 60 plans to 5.1% for 2.7% @
55 plans. For safety plans, the ratios range from 5.2% for 2% @ 55 plans to 9.3% for 3% @ 50 plans.
Present Value of Projected Benefits
• The table below shows the change in the total present value of benefits for the proposed plan amendment. The
present value of benefits represents the total dollars needed today to fund ail future benefits for current members of
the plan (i.e., without regard to future employees). The difference between this amount and current plan assets
must be paid by future employee and. employer contributions. As such, the change in the present value of benefits
due to the plan amendment represents the °cost" of the plan amendment
However, for plans with excess assets some or all of this "cost" may already be covered by current excess assets.
As of June 30, 2007
Current Plan
Post= Amendment
Total Assets at Market Value (MVA)
$
292,102,211
$ 292,102,211
Actuarial Value of Assets (AVA)
250,062,262
250,062,262
AVA / MVA
85.6%
85.6%
Present Value of Projected Benefits (PVB)
$
364,567,961
$ 365,332,822
Actuarial Value of Assets (AVA)
250.062,262
250,062,262
Present Value of Future Employer and
11,505,695
115,270,560
Employee Contributions (PVB - AVA)
Change to PVB
_
764,861
Accrued Liability
It is not required, nor necessarily desirable, to have accumulated assets sufficient to cover the total present value of
benefits until every member has left employment Instead, the actuarial funding process calculates a regular
contribution schedule of employee contributions and employer contributions (called normal costs) which are designed
• to accumulate with interest to equal the total present value of benefits by the time every member has left
employment As of each June 30, the actuary calculates the "desirable" level of plan assets as of that point in time
by subtracting the present value of scheduled future employee contributions and future employer normal costs from
the total present value of benefits. The resulting "desirable" level of assets is called the aarued &Nl,ily.
November 19, 2008 Page 2 13
CONTRACT AMENDMENT COST ANALYSIS- VALUATION. BASIS: June 30,2007
SAFETY PLAN FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Employer Number. 60
Benefit Description:Section 21362.2,3% @ 50 Full Formula for Local Safety Members (Safetytftbrds Only)
Disclosure
If your agency is requesting cost information for two or more benefit changes, the cost of adoppb than one of
these changes may not be obtained by adding the individual costs. Instead, a separate valoOdf cost be done to
provide a cost analysis for the combination of benefit changes. If the proposed plan amen to only
some of the employees in the plan, the rate change due to the plan amendment still applies to the, an, and is
still based on the total plan payroll.
Any mandated benefit improvements not included in the June 30, 2007 annual valuation have not'694rincorporated
into this cost analysis.
Please note that the cost analysis provided in this document may not be relied upon after August 1, 2009. If you
have not taken action to amend your contract, by this date, you must contact our office for an updated cost analysis,
based on the new annual valuation.
Descriptions of the actuarial methodologies, actuarial assumptions, and plan benefit provisions may be found in the
appendices of the June 30, 2007 annual report. Please note that the results shown here are subject to change if any,
of the data or plan provisions change from what was used in this study.
Certification
•
This actuarial valuation for the proposed plan amendment is based on the participant, benefits, and asset data used •
in the June 30, 2007 annual valuation, with the benefits modified if necessary to reflect what is currently provided
under your contract with CalPERS, and further modified to reflect the proposed plan amendment. The valuation has
been performed in accordance with standards of practice prescribed by the Actuarial Standards Board, and the
assumptions and methods are internally consistent and reasonable for this plan, as prescribed by the CalPERS Board
of Administration according to provisions set forth in the. California Public Employees' Retirement Law.
Richard Santos, ASA, MAAA
Senior Pension Actuary, CaIPERS
•
Fin Process Ids: Annual- 318076
Base - 321835 Proposal- 321836
November 19, 2008 Page 5
• CONTRACT AMENDMENT COST ANALYSIS - VALUATION BASIS: 3une 36, 2667
SAFETY PLAN FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Employer Number: 60
Benefit Descdptkm: Section 21362.2; 3% @ 50 Full Formula for Local Safety Members (Safety Lifeguards Only)
Summary of Plan Amendments Valued
COVERAGE GROUP 76001
Pre - Amendment
The Service Retirement benefit calculated for service earned by this group of members Is a monthly
allowance equal to the product of the 3% @ 55 benefit factor, years of service, and final campensabcn.
(Final compensation is reduced by $133.33 per month for members with a modified formula). The
benefit factors for retirement at integral ages are shown below:
Retirement 3% at 55
Agee Factor
50 2.400%
51 2.520%
52 2.640%
53 2.760%
54 2.880%
55 and older 3.000%
Post- Amendment
The Service Retirement benefit calculated for service earned by this group of members is a monthly
allowance equal to the product of the 3% @ 50 benefit factor, years of service, and final compensation.
• (Final compensation is reduced by $133.33 per month for members with a modified formula). The
benefit factors for retirement at Integral ages are shown below:
Retirement 3% at 50
Age Factor
50 3.000%
51 3.000%
52 3.000%
53 3.000%
54 3.000%
55 and. older 3.000%
•
November 19, 2008 Page 6
F]
COUNCIL AGENDA
No. 3
ORDINANCE NO. 2009 -10
• 3--
AN AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY
AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT
SYSTEM
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach, California, HEREBY
ORDAINS as follows:
SECTION 1: That the Amendment to the contract between the City of Newport Beach and
the Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System is hereby
authorized, a copy of said Amendment being attached hereto, marked "Exhibit ", and by
such reference made a part hereof as though set out in full.
SECTION 2: The Mayor of the City of Newport Beach is hereby authorized,
empowered and directed to execute said Amendment for and on behalf of the City.
SECTION 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is,
for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the
• validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council
hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance, and each section, subsection,
clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections,
subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases be declared unconstitutional.
SECTION 4: This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption, and
prior to expiration of fifteen (15) days from the passage thereof shall be published once
in the Daily Pilot, a newspaper of general circulation, published in Costa Mesa and
circulated in the City of Newport Beach, and thenceforth and thereafter shall be in full
force and effect.
SECTION 5: This ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Newport Beach, held on the 14th day of April, 2009, and adopted on the 12th day
of May, 2009, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES, COUNCILMEMBE
NOES, COUNCILMEMBE
• ABSENT COUNCILMEMB
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
app R� nt
CITY ATTORN
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
0
•
Authorized to Publish Advertisements of all kinds Including public notices by
Decree of the Superior C1wrt of Change Ctwnty, California. Number A-6214.
September 29, 1%1, and A 24831 lone 11. 1963.
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I am a Citizen of the United States and a
resident of the County aforesaid; I am
over the age of eighteen years, and not a
party to or interested in the below entitled
matter. I am a principal clerk of the
NEWPORT BEACH - COSTA MESA
DAILY PILOT, a newspaper of general
circulation, printed and published in the
City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange,
State of California, and that attached
Notice is a true and complete copy as
was printed and published on the
following dates:
May 16, 2009
I declare, under penalty of perjury, that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on May 18, 2009 at
Costa Mesa, California.
Signat
RECEIVED
21119 MAY 22 AM 9? 31
7LyL fFr -CE OF
p�
I l`E CSI t t C�lCr7fC
WY of I�FNPORr BEA(,ti
.1111
Subject ordnance wee
adootted 2009tro Mh day
of May, AYES COUNCIL ?AMBERS',
KAN. DAM. GARDNER,
DAIGLE, MAYOR SELICN
NCFS. COUNCIL MEMBER'.
ABSENT, COUNCIL MEM
AIISiMN. COUNCIL MEM-
MAYOR Edwyp S110
CITY CLERK. Lnlani I
&own
for ende test a aewlC4k
CIrenew m BM CrtY
Clerk's o d tle LAy
d Newport rt B NtlI.
PWIeNed Newport BCa1K'.
Costa Mora Day PAUL May
16. 2009 SaM