Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout13 - Hoag & Newport Harbor Lutheran Church Development AgreementsCITY OF NE WPORT REACH' T <� City Council Staff Report CgG1F00.N Agenda Item No. 13 April 26, 2011 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Community Development Department Dana Smith, Assistant City Manager 949 - 644 - 3002, dsmith @newportbeachca.gov PREPARED BY: Javier S. Garcia AICP, Senior Planner APPROVED: _ C� �L✓d� A TITLE: Development Agreement Annual Compliance Review — 2011 A.) Newport Harbor Lutheran Church (DA 10, PA2009 -137) B.) Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian (DA 5, PA2009 -064) ABSTRACT: Annual review to determine good faith compliance with the requirements of the Development Agreements for the following two properties: A. Newport Harbor Lutheran Church (Development Agreement No. 10), 798 Dover Drive B. Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian (Restated Development Agreement No. 5), 1 Hoag Drive RECOMMENDATION: 1. Conduct a public hearing; and 2. Find that both institutions have demonstrated good faith compliance with the terms of their development agreements; and 3. Receive and file Annual Status Reports of Development Agreements for Newport Harbor Lutheran Church (Attachment No. CC 1), and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian (Attachment No. CC 2). FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: There is no fiscal impact related to this item since the City will be reimbursed by the applicants. 1 Page 2 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS: A.) Newport Harbor Lutheran Church (Development Agreement No. 10): On June 23, 1997, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 97 -22 approving the Development Agreement between the City of Newport Beach and the Newport Harbor Lutheran Church (Church) for the development and operation of religious institution. The term of the Development Agreement No. 10 is for a period of 25 years subject to the provisions within the Development Agreement. The purpose of the development agreement is to: • Grant vested development rights of 40,000 gross square feet to the Church for the future expansion of its facilities and uses on Church property. • Provide for the Church's conveyance to the City of approximately 0.65 acres of Church property for use as a public parking facility to serve Bob Henry Park and Castaways Park, in consideration of the City's conveyance to the Church of at least 0.65 acres of City property. The conveyance has been executed. • Provide for the construction of parking areas and other improvements on the Church property to replace existing parking spaces located on the property conveyed to the City. The construction of the parking areas has been completed. • Restore or replace other Church improvements (water and sewer connections) impacted by the City's public park project in consideration for the exchange of property as specified by the Development Agreement. These improvements have been completed. Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 15.45 of the Municipal Code and Section 6 of the Development Agreement, the City of Newport Beach shall conduct an annual review of the terms of the Development Agreement to determine if the Newport Harbor Lutheran Church is, in good faith, in substantial compliance. As of March 11, 2011, the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement have been implemented and /or accomplished except for the Church expansion. No building permits have been issued for any new construction. After reviewing the development agreement and the status report from the Church (letter of response from Pastor Bradley R. Stienstra, Attachment No. CC 1), staff determined that the Church has complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement. 2 Page 3 B.) Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian (Development Agreement No 5 In 1994, the City executed a Development Agreement No. 5 (DA) related to the long term development and expansion of Hoag Hospital. In May of 2008, the Restated Development Agreement No. 5 and the Hoag Planned Community Text (PC Text) were amended to allow the hospital to increase the intensity of future development on the upper campus commensurate with a reduction in intensity of future development of the lower campus. The City Council conducted a public hearing on April 27, 2010, on Hoag's compliance with the terms of the Development Agreement. The City Council determined that Hoag is in good faith compliance with the Development Agreement with the exception of their efforts to implement required noise mitigation at the main loading dock. Questions were also raised about vapor plume reduction at the cogeneration plant. City Council continued the public hearing and directed Hoag to submit a plan to address loading dock noise mitigation and vapor plume. Hoag submitted additional noise compliance information, cogeneration plan operational data and a plan to address noise at the loading dock. That information was reviewed at the June 22, 2010, meeting. The meeting was again continued due to unresolved issues regarding noise mitigation at the loading dock and cogeneration plant plume reduction. At its meeting of September 14, 2010, the City Council addressed remaining items of the Annual Status Review of Development Agreement No. 5 and found Hoag to be in good faith compliance with the agreement. On March 29, 2011, Hoag submitted a compliance report that includes a comprehensive noise compliance report, information regarding cogeneration plant plume reduction, and photos of the noise mitigation installation at the loading dock. As of this date, there has been no new construction activity within the Hoag Campus, beyond the scope of current approvals that necessitates additional review for compliance with the terms of the Development Agreement. Hoag's future implementation of unconstructed entitlement will be subject to review and compliance with the provisions of the Development Agreement. .Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 15.45 of the Municipal Code and Section 5.4 of the amended DA requires an annual review of the DA for compliance. Items related to the provision of a noise compliance report, Cogeneration Plant Energy Curtailment (plume reduction) and Noise Mitigation and Loading Dock are included in the Annual Status Report for 2011 as follows: 1. Significant Development Agreement provisions are as follows a. Per Section 5.4 of the DA, the review must include a noise regulation compliance assessment. RS Acoustics prepared a compliance report for the 2010 Annual 3 Page 4 Compliance Review that concluded that the Lower and Upper Hoag Campuses were meeting applicable noise standards (by RS Acoustics, Executive Summary Table 1, page 3 of the Acoustical Measurement Test Program Report). Mitigation of noise from the Ancillary Building is 100 % complete at this time (see 2c below). Hoag has also completed the sound wall construction as evidenced by photos and copies of building permits provided in Annual Status Report Attachment. The follow -up noise study Annual Status Report Attachment indicates compliance has been achieved. Staff believes that Hoag is in good faith compliance with this provision. b. Section 8.3 of the amended DA provides sales & use tax origin provisions. Hoag is required to include a provision in its general construction contracts, when contracts exceed $5 million, that the contractors and subcontractors shall allocate all eligible sales taxes to the City. Hoag has prepared appropriate language within their Master Services Agreement; however, no qualifying contracts have been signed within the last reporting period. Hoag is also required to follow the Direct Payment Permit Process established by the Revenue and Taxation Code and use the permit for all qualifying individual purchases in excess of $100,000. Both of these provisions are ongoing and will be monitored as necessary. Staff believes Hoag is in good faith compliance. c. Section 8.4 of the amended DA requires Hoag to reimburse the City $150,000 for landscaping and irrigation improvements to Sunset View Park. Specifically, the improvements are planned for a 20,500 square -foot area directly north of the cogeneration facility that is not presently landscaped. This project has not been initiated by the City and this reimbursement provision has no completion requirement date or "sunset" clause and Hoag is prepared to reimburse the City upon completion of the improvements. d. Section 8.5 of the amended DA requires Hoag to curtail the cogeneration plant's effective heat rejection by 33% to reduce plume formation during certain atmospheric conditions between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. from November 15f to April 30th of each year. Hoag installed a weather station in 2009 as required that allows them to identify plume formation conditions as they occur so they can reduce cooling tower load to reduce the cooling tower plume. Hoag has submitted printouts of daily atmospheric conditions and heat load for the Period between November 18th and March 19�', 2011 (ended prior to the required time period in order to prepare and submit the report to the Planning Department for an April hearing date), as regulated by the DA. The balance of the reporting period will be carried over into next year's Annual Status Report. As previously requested; a detailed listing of days where atmospheric conditions necessitated the 33% reduction of effective heat rejection at the cooling towers, and documentation of the 33% reduction of effective heat rejection has been provided, and a copy is on file in the Community Development Department. The DA also requires that Hoag automate the plant's controls based upon weather 4 Page 5 station data. Hoag has been unable to automate the controls with the weather station at this time and continues to monitor and manually adjust/reduce cooling tower load to reduce the cooling tower plume. In the absence of such automation to produce an integrated progress report, Hoag continues to provide the requested information in the same form as previously submitted to demonstrate compliance. Staff believes that Hoag is in good faith compliance with this provision. 2. Mitigation & Compliance Update a. Villa Balboa window replacement — Hoag offered and was obligated through approval of the Master Plan Update to provide a window replacement program for condominium units located at 260 Cagney Lane (Project Design Feature (PDF) 3.4 -1). Subsequent to the City's adoption of the Master Plan Update and PDF 3.4 -1, Hoag and Villa Balboa entered into a private agreement to provide window replacements for condominium units at 260 Cagney Lane and also agreed to a modified set of guidelines to implement the window replacement program. Hoag has pursued the goal of noise reduction and mitigation in good faith and has worked with Villa Balboa to reach an agreement on the cost of the replacement windows. Building permits for window replacement were finaled between January 18, 2011, and March 8, 2011. The window replacement program is now satisfied and complete. b. West Road sound wall — The required sound wall is completed as reflected by the copy of the permit and photos in the attached Status Report Attachment (TAB 4). Hoag has complied with the provisions of the Development Agreement requiring the sound wall. The effectiveness of the wall has been evaluated by a qualified noise consultant included in the Status Report Attachment (TAB 1, Summary Table 1 on Page 3 of the acoustical report). c. Ancillary Building and West Tower noise reduction —Hoag has implemented all previously identified noise reducing measures and is in good faith compliance. d. Truck deliveries to the loading dock — Staff has not received any complaints about excessive idling and staff believes Hoag is in good faith compliance. e. Loading dock sound panels, trash compactor and bailer relocation /enclosure — Hoag has installed approximately 650 square feet of sound absorbing panels on the west facing wall of the building at the loading dock. The type of panel is consistent with Mitigation Measure 3.4 -5 and the amount exceeds the minimum specified, which was 450 square feet. Hoag has received permit approval and final for completion from the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) for the installation of the panels. Staff believes Hoag is in good faith compliance. 15 Page 6 Mitigation Measure 3.4 -6 of the SEIR requires relocation of and the construction of a three -sided enclosure around the existing trash compactor (including a roof). The existing cardboard baler was required to be enclosed with a three -sided enclosure as well. Hoag has completed the enclosure of the trash compactor and the baler consistent with Mitigation Measure 3.4 -6, see the photos in the Annual Status Report — Attachment TAB 6. Given that there are no noise violations, as indicated in the comprehensive noise compliance report, additional mitigation (full compliance) is not necessary at this time. Staff believes Hoag is in good faith compliance with these mitigation requirements as an interim period. However, relocation and full enclosure of the trash compactor will be required as a part of Hoag Hospital's future construction of a new structure or structures on the Upper Campus requiring the transfer of buildable square footage from the Lower Campus or in conjunction with the future reconfiguration of the loading dock. I. Grease trap cleaning schedule —The clean out schedule has been implemented and no reports of any problems have been received. Staff believes Hoag is in good faith compliance. g. Cogeneration building lattice screen — This improvement has been completed and Hoag is in good faith compliance. h. Lower Campus landscaping — Hoag has completed the installation process for the landscaping within the parking lot, along the slope above the lower campus retaining wall and within the landscape area abutting Coast Highway (the "green screen "). Therefore, staff believes that Hoag is in good faith compliance. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Staff recommends the City Council find this project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA ") pursuant to Section 15321 of the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act. This section exempts actions by regulatory agencies to enforce or revoke a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use issued, adopted, or prescribed by the regulatory agency or enforcement of a law, general rule, standard, or objective, administered or adopted by the regulatory agency. NOTICING: The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the City Council considers the item). Additionally, in accordance with the provisions of the development agreements, notice of this hearing was mailed to property owners within 300 feet of Newport Harbor Lutheran Church and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian. 0 Development Agreement Annual Review - 2011 April 26, 2011 Page 7 Submitted by: �-� -� Javier Garda AICP Senior Planner Attachments: Vicinity Maps CC1- Status Letter from Pastor Bradley of Newport Harbor Lutheran Church CC 2- Letter and Status Report Summary for Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian; and Hoag 3rd Annual Review and Supplemental Compliance Reports (binder contents), dated March 28, 2011 0 2 I 10 Attachment No. CC 1 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 10 Letter from Newport Harbor Lutheran Church (PA2009 -137) 164 12 t,UTtiE.k 7 v NEWPORT HARBOR LUTHERAN CHURCH A worshipping family, anckored in C rist, providing safe karbor for all. 798 Dover Drive Newport Beach California 92663 949.548.3631 fax 949.548.1544 music 949.548.8004 preschool 949.548.7198 nhlc798 @8ol.com P9aaa, 131 March 7, 2011 Mr. Javier S. Garcia Planning Department City of Newport Beach P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658 -8915 Subject: 2011 Status Report on Development Agreement No. 10 Newport Harbor Lutheran Church Dear Mr. Garcia: Since our 2010 review of the terms and conditions listed in the 1997 development agreement we have entered into with the City of Newport Beach, no new construction activities were completed by the church. We are continuing to refine our long -range plan for the future of our ministry in the community, and we will be determining how best to move forward with the implementation of the provisions of the agreement for the future development of our campus. AT &T, which currently operates cellular equipment on the roof of our office building, has submitted a proposal to the building department for the construction of a clock tower to house their antennae, and we have been told to expect that work to begin soon. I trust this review is sufficient for your needs. If there are further questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me, Sincerely, Bradley R. Stienstra Pastor PS,T�ly� 00- 2s 14 Attachment No. CC 2 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO.5 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT FROM HOAG MEMEORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN (PA2009 -064) 15 10 COVER LETTER AND REPORT SUMMARY PA2009 -064 2011 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REVIEW 17 12 (f� w� c ,11x11 �i i HO IN "KIM 110AN 1�131� a O n u ri vN �tO1f)] La el[lB<�od�1_n )II, V -(Ii,J l March 20, 2011 Mr. Jim Campbell Acting Planning Division Director City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92658 -8915 RE: Hoag Hospital - Development Agreement Annual Review Dear Mr. Campbell: Please find attached the required documentation to demonstrate hloag' s compliance with the Development Agreement between Hoag Hospital and the City of Newport Beach. As you are aware, this Development Agreement was adopted by the City Council on April 22, 2008 by Ordinance No.2008 -10 and is known as the Amendment to Restated Development Agreement No. S. Per Section 5.2 of the Development Agreement, "The Annual Review shall be conducted at a public hearing noticed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 15.45 of the Newport [ Beach Municipal Code. Annual reviews should be scheduled in April of each year." It is our understanding based on discussions with city staff, that we will be scheduled for the April 26",,2011 City Council, hearing per the above noted requirement. The enclosed Project Status Update is for the period of time from March 12, 2010 through March 28, 2011. Sincerely, Mr. Sanford Smith Senior Vice President Real Estate and facilities Enclosure �wc Ha.:., Uo.:• uaDi��nW�a ..:�:,. ......h,", a 19 Project Status Report March 31, 2010 Thru March 28, 2011 Third Annual Review of the Development Agreement Between the City of Newport Beach And Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Introduction & Overview On April 22, 2008, the City of Newport Beach ( "City') approved an amended Development Agreement between the city of Newport Beach and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian ( "Hoag ") which is known as the "Amendment to the Restated Development Agreement No. 5 ". This Amended Development Agreement was adopted by Ordinance No. 2008 -10 on May 13, 2008. Per Section 5.2 of the Amended Development Agreement: "The Annual Review shall be conducted at a public hearing noticed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 15.45 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Annual Reviews should be scheduled in April of each year." This Amended Development Agreement was part of Hoag's Master Plan Update which included revised Development Agreement provisions, a revised Planned Community Text ( "PC Text ") and associated standards, and certification of the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report ( "SEIR ") with mitigation measures. The Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 1991071003) was certified by adoption of City Council Resolution No. 2008 -27. As part of the SEIR adoption, a Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program was required which shall be utilized as the basis for the Development Agreement Updates as it relates to mitigation measures. For the purposes of this Development Agreement update, and those subsequent annual updates, this update shall serve as the Third Annual Review for the Amendment to the Restated Development Agreement No 5. Project Status for the Third Development Agreement Annual Review As will be described in detail below, over the last year, Hoag has made a diligent, good faith effort to complete as many of the mitigation measures and associated requirements for both the Development Agreement & Planned Community Text as required in this timeframe. It should be noted, that the March 12, 2010, Status Report, had two supplements dated June, 2010, and August, 2010. For your reference, we have attached the August, 2010 Supplement. As you are aware, the City Council approved the Development Agreement Annual Compliance Review on September 14, 2010. In that the work done between the months of March, 2010 and August, 2010, were covered in 20 the Supplement, this review will generally update the remainder of the year from September, 2010, thru March, 2011. Development Agreement Specific Terms & Obligations In the separate terms of the Development Agreement requirements (not found in either Mitigation Measures or PC Requirements), the following have been completed: 11. Section 5.4 "5.4 Mitigation Review. The annual review shall include a detailed report of compliance with the various conditions and mitigation measures contained with the mitigation monitoring plan. The report shall also include a noise regulation compliance assessment that includes noise measurements prepared by a qualified noise consultant on a yearly basis. The noise assessment shall identify noise regulation compliance issues and recommended measures to abate any noncompliance. The report shall include an analysis of the view impacts of buildings constructed in comparison to the anticipated views depicted in the EIR. Hoag shall be found in compliance with this Agreement unless the City Council determines, based upon evidence presented at the Annual Review, that Hoag has not complied with all mitigation measures and conditions including those imposed as a result of subsequent environmental analysis, applicable to the grading of, or building on, the Property as of the date of the Annual Review. Hoag shall pay the City administrative costs incurred in conducting Annual Reviews. Hoag shall reimburse the City for costs incurred by the City associated with Fluor Enterprises' review of the cogeneration plant during the 2008 Annual Review." Hoag has complied with this section of the Amended Development Agreement with the submittal of this detailed report which demonstrates good faith compliance with the various conditions and mitigation measures contained within the mitigation monitoring plan, as noted below. Additionally, Hoag has complied with noise regulation compliance assessment. A noise analysis was performed by RS Acoustics on March 7, 2011 which demonstrates complete compliance with the noise standards in all locations. (Attachment 1) No view analysis was necessary in this annual Development Agreement review, as no new construction has occurred on the Hoag campus during this timeframe. 15. New Section 8.4 — Sunset View Park Improvements "8.4 Hoag shall reimburse the City up to $150,000 for installation of groundcover, shrubs, and irrigation systems with the unimproved portion of Sunset View Park and Superior Avenue, approximately 20,500 sq ft in area, located northerly of the cogeneration building. Reimbursement to the City shall be within 30 days of Hoag receiving an invoice from the City." The City has not moved forward with this project during this time period, and therefore has not requested a reimbursement for park improvements from Hoag. 21 16. New Section 8. 5— Cogeneration Plant Energy Curtailment "8.5 Hoag shall install a weather station capable of identifying ambient conditions necessary in documenting cogeneration plant and cooling tower operations. The weather station shall be tied into the cogeneration plant controls in order to maximize automatic responses to prevailing weather conditions, assisting in managing the operation changes and load shifting, as well as to provide periodic reports on plant operations. Hoag shall not construct or erect additional cooling towers within the Hoag Lower Campus. Hoag shall reduce the effective heat rejection by 33% at the existing cooling towers and such reduction shall be measured from a baseline (to be measured at the cooling towers) of operating three existing generators and absorption chiller at 100% of design capacity. This reduced capacity operation shall be implemented daily between November 1" and April 30th, between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM when the relative humidity is equal to or less than 55 degrees Fahrenheit." Hoag has complied with all requirements regarding the Cogeneration Plant Energy Curtailment and has attached a letter from Hoag's chief engineer of record, Michael Trzepacz, P.E. which certifies the plant has been operated in accordance with the curtailment requirements. Monthly Cogeneration Plant Reports for the months of November and December (2010) and January, February and March, (2011) are attached on a disc for your review. (Attachment 2) Mitigation Measures and PC Text Requirements Because no new major construction has occurred over the last year, Hoag's focus has been to fulfill the requirements that were oriented to noise and aesthetics and that were required to be completed or are in progress in this Development Agreement annual review time period. For your reference, the relevant mitigation measures and PC Text requirements are attached in the order they are addressed below. Mitigation Measure 3.4 -9 Cogeneration Plant Noise As noted above, Hoag has complied with all noise standards and an annual noise analysis was performed by RS Acoustics on March 7, 2011, which concludes that (page 15) the Cogeneration Plant's operations comply with the noise standards. (Attachment 1) Noise — West Hoag Drive Mitigation Measure: PDF 3.4 -1—Villa Balboa Window Installation In August, 2010, Hoag fulfilled its obligation under this mitigation measure by depositing a check in the amount of $499,142.00, approved by the City, into an escrow account established by the Villa Balboa Community Association. The funds will pay for the condominium windows /sliding glass door upgrades. 22 Mitigation Measure: PDF 3.4 -2 — Sound Wall Construction of the 471 linear foot sound wall which commenced in October, 2009 is now complete. On January 19, 2010, the sound wall received final Certificate of Occupancy permits from the City of Newport Beach. A picture of the completed sound wall and copies of the permits are attached. (Attachment 4) Mitigation Measure 3.4 -5 - Loading Dock Sound Absorption Panels "Sound absorption panels on the east wall of the loading dock shall be installed. Approximately 450 square feet of absorptive panels shall be used to cover major portions of the back wall of the loading dock area. The Noise -Foil panels by Industrial Acoustics or a panel with equivalent or better sound rating shall be used." Noise Foil Sound Panels of approximately 650 square feet have been permitted and fully installed. A picture of the completed sound panels is attached along with copies of the final permits. (Attachment 5) Mitigation Measure 3.4 -6 — Relocation of the Trash Compactor "The trash compactor shall be relocated within the loading dock. The trash compactor and baler shall be enclosed in a three -side structure. The walls shall be concrete block or similar masonry construction. The roof shall be lightweight concrete roof or a plywood surface with concrete tiles; a built -up roof with 5'5" of insulation on the inside would be an acceptable alternative. The open side shall face away from residents. Doors may be on the side of the enclosure facing the residents, but must be closed when the baler or compactor are operating. The compactor and baler should only be operated between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM" The trash compactor /sanitizer has been enclosed on the north and south sides with an exterior metal panel system. The interior of the walls have been lined with Noise Foil Panels as recommended by the acoustical engineer. The roof was constructed of metal decking with a waterproof membrane and was constructed similar to the north and south walls and has a bellow material that wraps around the trash enclosure to allow for movement. The west wall of the compactor /sanitizer will be open for access. The west wall of the loading dock was lined from north to south with Noise Foil Panels as recommended by the acoustical engineer. The baler was constructed with three walls on the east, west and south sides. The north side will remain open for access. The roof of the baler enclosure was constructed with the same materials as the compactor /sanitizer roof structure as noted above. The compactor and baler are operated between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM. While Hoag is unable to fully relocate the trash compactor, per the Development Agreement Update City Council staff report dated September 14, 2010, staff notes: "Hoag has committed to relocate the trash compactor and provide a full enclosure as part of Hoag Hospital's construction of a new structure or structures on the Upper Campus requiring the transfer of buildable square footage from the Lower Campus or reconfiguration of the loading dock. In staff's opinion, this is a good faith partial and 23 substantial compliance with the Mitigation Measure 3.4 -6 for an interim period until such time when the trash compactor will be relocated and full compliance will be achieved as part of Hoag Hospital's construction of a new structure or structures on the Upper Campus requiring the transfer of buildable square footage from the Lower Campus or reconfiguration of the loading dock. " Therefore, Hoag is good faith partial and substantial compliance with this mitigation measure by constructing a trash compactor enclosure and a baler enclosure which include the use of sound absorption panels on both enclosures. These structures are complete and photos and permits are attached. (Attachment 6) Planned Community Requirements — Landscaping Lower Campus (Exhibit #6) Area 7a — West Parking Area Islands Requirement: 60 days after CDP issuance at Coastal Commission. Hoag received Coastal Commission's "Approval in Concept" of this item on April 8t", 2009 and final permits were received on December 15, 2009. Hoag obtained the required building permits for this project on January 19, 2010. Parking Lot Islands were complete by May, 2010. Hoag has proceeded in good faith and will be in full compliance with the completion of construction as noted above. (Attachment 7) Area 9 — North Slope above Retaining Wall Requirement: 120 days after CDP Issued by Coastal Commission. Hoag received Coastal Commission's "Approval in Concept" of this item on April 8'h, 2009 and final permits were issued by the City of Newport Beach on January 19, 2010. The Slope construction was scheduled to commence on May 24, 2010, and was completed by July, 2010. Hoag has proceeded in good faith and is in full compliance with the completion of construction as noted above. (Attachment 7) Area 12 PCH Green Screen Requirement: Immediately upon issuance of an Approval in Concept by the City an application shall be submitted for said improvements to the Coastal Commission. Construction of said improvements shall be completed no later than 18 months after Coastal Development Permit Issuance by the Coastal Commission. Hoag received Coastal Commission's "Approval in Concept" of this item on April 8'", 2009 and final permits were issued by the City of Newport Beach on January 19, 2010. :,--)/{- Hoag has proceeded in good faith and is in full compliance with the completion of the PCH Green Screen construction as required. Pictures of the completed landscaping are attached. (Attachment 7) 0 215 M HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN PA2009 -064 2011 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REVIEW PROJECT STATUS REPORT — AUGUST, 2010 SUPPLEMENT TO THE JUNE, 2010 SUPPLEMENT FOR THE PERIOD MARCH 31, 2009 THROUGH MARCH 12, 2010 The attachments referenced in this supplement were a part of last year's status review report are not provided in this report but are available upon request. 27 22 Project Status Report August, 2010 Supplement to June, 2010 Supplement for March 31, 2009 through March 12, 2010 Second Annual Review of the Development Agreement Between the City of Newport Beach And Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian On April 27, 2010, the Newport Beach City Council held a public hearing on Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian — Development Agreement Annual Compliance Review for the period of March 31,2009 through March 12, 2010 and determined Hoag Hospital to be in good faith compliance with the terms of the Development Agreement except for certain conditions and mitigation measures discussed in the public hearing. This report has therefore been prepared as a supplement to the March 12, 2010, Second Annual Review of the Development Agreement to provide further information requested by the staff and City Council. Additionally, it should be noted that an additional supplemental report was completed in June, 2010, which is included within the text of this document for reference purposes. June, 2010 Supplement : Cogeneration Plant Energy Curtailment Monthly Cogeneration Plant Reports for the months of July, August, October, November, December 2009, and January, February 2010, were attached in the March 12'h report. As a supplement to that report, the reports for the months of March and April 2010, were submitted to City Staff on disc. Additionally, a memo from the Engineer of Record, Michael Trzepacz, P.E. which provided a Period Summary report has been submitted to City Staff. August, 2010 Supplement: Cogeneration Plant Energy Curtailment During the months of October 2009 to April 2010, the weather station on Hoag's Lower Campus provided data to the Co- generation plant operators and activated the alarm when the identified plume atmospheric conditions were present. When the alarm sounded, staff confirmed the cooling tower heat rejection load (BTU /hr) levels were below the established threshold criteria for tower heat rejection. If conditions were under the threshold for heat rejection no additional action was necessary and none was taken. (Should the levels be above the established threshold, additional action would be taken, including a load shift to the upper campus power plant). During the months of October 2009 through April 2010 there were no times when the cooling tower heat rejection load exceeded the threshold limit resulting in maximizing responses to prevailing weather conditions due to the following. October, November and December 2009 - Scheduled maintenance of each of the three Caterpillar generators and absorption units allowed Hoag to insure heat rejection remained at 66% of full capacity by taking down one generator and chiller per month during this period. : 9 January, February, March and April 2010 - Protocols were put into place to utilize a combination of thermal loading and load shifting to the Upper Campus power plant to proactively manage the heat rejection to the prescriptive levels. Mitigation Measures and PC Text Requirements Noise — West Hoag Drive June, 2010 Supplement Mitigation Measure: PDF 3.4 -1—Villa Balboa Window Installation Copies of the 18 letters that were sent to Villa Balboa residents providing notice of their eligibility to have windows and sliding glass door(s) in their condominiums upgraded as part of the Noise Abatement Program being offered by Hoag were submitted to City Staff. These letters were sent on May 24, 2010 by certified mail return receipt requested and gave each owner a 45 -day period to respond with a request to participate in the Noise Abatement Program. The eligible condominium owners were informed that the windows and sliding glass door(s) noise attenuation improvements will be installed by a qualified and licensed contractor retained by the Villa Balboa Community Association, the cost of which shall be reimbursed by Hoag to the Association pursuant to the bid estimate approved by the City of Newport Beach. Once this 45 -day period to respond has run, Hoag will fund the window installations for those residents, responding to the notice. Hoag is in good faith compliance with this mitigation measure and will fully meet its obligations by funding the windows and sliding glass door(s). August, 2010 Supplement As of August 10, 2010, all eligible Villa Balboa condominium owners have responded positively indicating their election to participate in the Noise Abatement Program. Based on the responses, Hoag has fulfilled its full obligation under this mitigation measure by depositing a check in the amount of $499,142.00 into the IronStone Bank, established by the Villa Balboa Community Association for escrowing the funds to fully pay for the condominium windows /sliding glass doors upgrades. Mitigation Measures 3.4- 2/3.4 -3 Heating. Ventilation and Air Conditioning for Ancillary Building and West Tower. March 12, 2010 Report: As of last year's update, Hoag had proceeded in good faith to complete the requirements of these mitigation measures in the following manner. The West Tower sound louvers were installed on January 9, 2009 and were sound tested in February and met noise standards. The Ancillary Building roof top sound wall was completed in August, 2008. The plans for the relocation of the kitchen exhaust equipment into a mechanical enclosure for the Ancillary Building are completed and were submitted to OSHPD on August 22, 2008 and permits were received on March 17, 2009. The final permit showing completion of the project by OSHPD is attached. During this last year, Hoag finished the work required in these mitigation measures and as noted in the above referenced noise analysis by RS Acoustics (Attachment 1), Hoag has redesigned the so kitchen exhaust fans and penthouse enclosure located on the rooftop of the ancillary building per the requirements. With the completion of these improvements, Hoag complies with the day time noise standards and is slightly higher by 1 deA than the requirement in the nighttime. Once the Sound Wall is complete, Hoag anticipates it will be in complete compliance with all noise standards. June. 2010 Supplement: Please find attached, an updated Acoustical Study, completed on April 26, 2010, by RS Acoustics, Inc. This study was conducted after the new sound wall along West Hoag Drive was complete. Per the study, (see section 3.1, page 17), Hoag meets or exceeds the noise standards as set forth in the Development Agreement and is now in full compliance with the noise requirements. (Attachment 3) August, 2010 Supplement Please find attached (August Attachment 1), an updated Acoustical Study, completed on August 1, 2010 by RS Acoustics, Inc. The study concludes (see section 3.1 p. 18) that Hoag meets or exceeds the noise standards as set forth in the Development Agreement and is now in full compliance with the noise requirements. Mitigation Measure 3.4 -5 — Loading Dock Sound Absorption Panels "Sound absorption panels on the east wall of the loading dock shall be installed. Approximately 450 square feet of absorptive panels shall be used to cover major portions of the back of the loading dock area. The Noise -Foil panels by Industrial Acoustics or a panel with an equivalent or better sound rating shall be used" Per the attached sketch, labeled "Mitigation Measures, 3.4 -5 and 3.4 -6 ", Sound Panels of approximately 950 square feet ( 500 square feet more than required by the mitigation measure) made with Noise Foil Panels will be mounted to the building, per the mitigation measure. (Attachment 4) It is anticipated that the plans will be submitted to OSHPD by June 17, 2010, and construction will commence by the end of August, 2010. August, 2010 Supplement On July 13, 2010, OSHPD has issued building permit (August Attachment 2) for the Loading Dock Sound Panels. (See Attached) Construction has commenced and will be completed by September 10, 2011. June, 2010 Supplement Mitigation Measure 3.4 -6 — Relocation of the Trash Compactor "The trash compactor shall be relocated within the loading dock. The trash compactor and baler shall be enclosed in a three -sided structure. The walls shall be concrete block or similar masonry construction. The roof shall be lightweight concrete roof or a plywood surface with concrete tiles; a built -up roof with 5'5" of insulation on the inside would be an acceptable alternative. The open side S1 shall face away from the residents. Doors may be on the side of the enclosure facing residents, but must be closed when the baler or compactor are operating. The compactor and baler should only be operated between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM." This mitigation measure will be met in the following manner, per the two attached sketches, "Modified Loading Dock Plan -June 12, 2010 ". The trash compactor area currently has one exterior louvered wall adjacent to it. Hoag is proposing to install a modified enclosure on the two remaining exterior exposed areas facing West Hoag Drive as follows; the front gate will be constructed with the Sound Fighter wall materials, the north wall will be constructed with an exterior grade framed lath and plaster insulated wall system. The baler will be partially enclosed on two sides with the Sound Fighter panels. (Attachment 4) The doors will be closed when the compactor is operating. The compactor and baler will be operated between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM. Plans will be submitted to both the City and OSHPD within 60 days. August, 2010 Supplement Based on further input from City Staff, the trash compactor area has been redesigned as follows: (See attached photos and drawing of the Enclosure for Trash Compactor & Baler — August Attachment 3) The trash compactor /sanitizer will be enclosed on the north and south sides with an exterior metal panel system. The interior of the walls will be lined with Noise Foil Panels as recommended by the acoustical engineer. The roof will be constructed of metal decking with a waterproof membrane and be constructed similar to the north and south walls and will have a bellow material to wrap around the trash enclosure to allow for movement. The east wall of the compactor /sanitizer will be open for access. The west wall of the loading dock will be lined from north to south with Noise Foil Panels as recommended by the acoustical engineer. The baler will be constructed with three walls on the east, west, and south sides. The north side will remain open for access. The roof of the baler enclosure will be constructed of the same materials as the compactor / sanitizer roof structure noted above. The compactor and baler will be operated between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM. Plans will be submitted to both the City and OSHPD within 60 days. With the construction of the Trash Compactor and Baler Enclosure as described above, Hoag believes they are in good faith partial and substantial compliance with the Mitigation Measure for an interim period until such time when the trash compactor will be relocated and full compliance will be achieved as part of Hoag's construction of a new structure or structures on the Upper Campus requiring the transfer of buildable square footage from the Lower Campus and reconfiguration of the loading dock. S2 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterial Master Plan Development Agreement Annual Review March 28, 2011 Prepared By: SUBMITTAL COP) f 'l I'Plt)eCt :lloaq 3rd DA Review Turning Challenges into Victories Client: Hna.,� Mpmnr i a lIingni to 1 Dote: tdarch 28, 2011 1 San Joaquin Plaza, Suite 230 To. Jim Camp e. Dept }'lanniml Nemport Beach, CA 9266o ara Newman & Vi.cki. Fettrrmini 949-7-17-7943 �': _ _�— lowtv.govsol.com 33 S4 COVER LETTER AND REPORT SUMMARY PA2009 -064 2011 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REVIEW 3,5 so 10."1, lQ M0111N I I0"M IM. P1:1, 6'i'I10 i, I: hg\\ ^h if+(1 u..rt1 ro6A;.I,W ll�.l1/I IiS/'�'Jl tt"�jf l ll[erl,, +. A 2/f "Itl- {,Ilgl Match 20, 2011 Mr. Jim Campbell Acting Planning Division Director City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92650.0915 T o.v J Yo�z RE: Hoag Hospital - Development Agreement Annual Review Dear Mr. Campbell: Please find attached the required deeUmentatlol to demonstrate Floag's compliance with the Development Agreement between Floag Hospital and the City of Newport Beach. As you are aware, this Development Agreement was adopted by the City Council on April 22, 2000 by Ordinance No.2001 -10 and is known as the Amendment to Restated Development Agreement No. S. Per Section 5.2 of the Development Agreement, "The Annual Review shall be conducted at a public hearing noticed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 15.45 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Annual reviews should be scheduled in April of each year." It is our understanding based on discussions with city staff, that we will be scheduled for the April 26111, 2011 City Council hearing per the above noted requirement. The enclosed Project Status Update is for the period of time from March 12, 2010 through Match 28, 2011. Sincerely, _� - ----G Mr. Sanford Smith Senior Vice President Real Estate and Facilities Enclosure II".vl lL.rynl.d ❑.wlnnt 0.:,.h II�•aq ll. •.111111Le,nl• 1 mn l lA•ol I ln.:. I nJA1u 4;md Lti, �: nr• :,,A nl v lS:gn•n 11••.uL t 41,11A., w.vw Lnaq uul 37 Project Status Report March 31, 2010 Thru March 28, 2011 Third Annual Review of the Development Agreement Between the City of Newport Beach And Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Introduction & Overview On April 22, 2008; the City of Newport Beach ( "City ") approved an amended Development Agreement between the city of Newport Beach and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian ( "Hoag ") which is known as the "Amendment to the Restated Development Agreement No. 5 ". This Amended Development Agreement was adopted by Ordinance No. 2008 -10 on May 13; 2008. Per Section 5.2 of the Amended Development Agreement: "The Annual Review shall be conducted at a public hearing noticed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 15.45 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Annual Reviews should be scheduled in April of each year." This Amended Development Agreement was part of Hoag's Master Plan Update which included revised Development Agreement provisions, a revised Planned Community Text ( "PC Text ") and associated standards, and certification of the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report ( "SEIR ") with mitigation measures. The Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 1991071003) was certified by adoption of City Council Resolution No. 2008 -27. As part of the SEIR adoption, a Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program was required which shall be utilized as the basis for the Development Agreement Updates as it relates to mitigation measures. For the purposes of this Development Agreement update, and those subsequent annual updates, this update shall serve as the Third Annual Review for the Amendment to the Restated Development Agreement No 5. Project Status for the Third Development Agreement Annual Review As will be described in detail below, over the last year, Hoag has made a diligent, good faith effort to complete as many of the mitigation measures and associated requirements for both the Development Agreement & Planned Community Text as required in this timeframe. it should be noted, that the March 12, 2010, Status Report, had two supplements dated June, 2010, and August, 2010. For your reference, we have attached the August, 2010 Supplement. As you are aware, the City Council approved the Development Agreement Annual Compliance Review on September 14, 2010. In that the work done between the months of March, 2010 and August, 2010, were covered in so the Supplement, this review will generally update the remainder of the year from September, 2010, thru March, 2011. Development Agreement Specific Terms & Obligations In the separate terms of the Development Agreement requirements (not found in either Mitigation Measures or PC Requirements), the following have been completed: 11. Section 5.4 "5.4 Mitigation Review. The annual review shall include a detailed report of compliance with the various conditions and mitigation measures contained with the mitigation monitoring plan. The report shall also include a noise regulation compliance assessment that includes noise measurements prepared by a qualified noise consultant on a yearly basis. The noise assessment shall identify noise regulation compliance issues and recommended measures to abate any noncompliance. The report shall include an analysis of the view impacts of buildings constructed in comparison to the anticipated views depicted in the EIR. Hoag shall be found in compliance with this Agreement unless the City Council determines, based upon evidence presented at the Annual Review, that Hoag has not complied with all mitigation measures and conditions including those imposed as a result of subsequent environmental analysis, applicable to the grading of, or building on, the Property as of the date of the Annual Review. Hoag shall pay the City administrative costs incurred in conducting Annual Reviews. Hoag shall reimburse the City for costs incurred by the City associated with Fluor Enterprises' review of the cogeneration plant during the 2008 Annual Review." Hoag has complied with this section of the Amended Development Agreement with the submittal of this detailed report which demonstrates good faith compliance with the various conditions and mitigation measures contained within the mitigation monitoring plan, as noted below. Additionally, Hoag has complied with noise regulation compliance assessment. A noise analysis was performed by RS Acoustics on March 7, 2011 which demonstrates complete compliance with the noise standards in all locations. (Attachment 1) No view analysis was necessary in this annual Development Agreement review, as no new construction has occurred on the Hoag campus during this timeframe. 15. New Section 8.4 — Sunset View Park Improvements "8.4 Hoag shall reimburse the City up to $150,000 for installation of groundcover, shrubs, and irrigation systems with the unimproved portion of Sunset View Park and Superior Avenue, approximately 20,500 sq ft in area, located northerly of the cogeneration building. Reimbursement to the City shall be within 30 days of Hoag receiving an invoice from the City." The City has not moved forward with this project during this time period, and therefore has not requested a reimbursement for park improvements from Hoag. S9 16. New Section 8,5 — Cogeneration Plant Energy Curtailment "8.5 Hoag shall install a weather station capable of identifying ambient conditions necessary in documenting cogeneration plant and cooling tower operations. The weather station shall be tied into the cogeneration plant controls in order to maximize automatic responses to prevailing weather conditions, assisting in managing the operation changes and load shifting, as well as to provide periodic reports on plant operations. Hoag shall not construct or erect additional cooling towers within the Hoag Lower Campus. Hoag shall reduce the effective heat rejection by 33% at the existing cooling towers and such reduction shall be measured from a baseline (to be measured at the cooling towers) of operating three existing generators and absorption chiller at 100% of design capacity. This reduced capacity operation shall be implemented daily between November 1" and April 30'h, between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM when the relative humidity is equal to or less than 55 degrees Fahrenheit." Hoag has complied with all requirements regarding the Cogeneration Plant Energy Curtailment and has attached a letter from Hoag's chief engineer of record, Michael Trzepacz, P.E. which certifies the plant has been operated in accordance with the curtailment requirements. Monthly Cogeneration Plant Reports for the months of November and December (2010) and January, February and March, (2011) are attached on a disc for your review. (Attachment 2) Mitigation Measures and PC Text Requirements Because no new major construction has occurred over the last year, Hoag's focus has been to fulfill the requirements that were oriented to noise and aesthetics and that were required to be completed or are in progress in this Development Agreement annual review time period. For your reference, the relevant mitigation measures and PC Text requirements are attached in the order they are addressed below. Mitigation Measure 3.4 -9 Cogeneration Plant Noise As noted above, Hoag has complied with all noise standards and an annual noise analysis was performed by RS Acoustics on March 7, 2011, which concludes that (page 15) the Cogeneration Plant's operations comply with the noise standards. (Attachment 1) Noise —West Hoag Drive Mitigation Measure: PDF 3.4 -1— Villa Balboa Window Installation In August, 2010, Hoag fulfilled its obligation under this mitigation measure by depositing a check in the amount of $499,142.00, approved by the City, into an escrow account established by the Villa Balboa Community Association. The funds will pay for the condominium windows /sliding glass door upgrades. 40 Mitigation Measure: PDF 3.4 -2 —Sound Wall Construction of the 471 linear foot sound wall which commenced in October, 2009 is now complete. On January 19, 2010, the sound wall received final Certificate of Occupancy permits from the City of Newport Beach. A picture of the completed sound wall and copies of the permits are attached. (Attachment 4) Mitigation Measure 3.4 -5 - Loading Dock Sound Absorption Panels "Sound absorption panels on the east wall of the loading dock shall be installed. Approximately 450 square feet of absorptive panels shall be used to cover major portions of the back wall of the loading dock area. The Noise -Foil panels by Industrial Acoustics or a panel with equivalent or better sound rating shall be used." Noise Foil Sound Panels of approximately 650 square feet have been permitted and fully installed. A picture of the completed sound panels is attached along with copies of the final permits. (Attachment 5) Mitigation Measure 3.4 -6 — Relocation of the Trash Compactor "The trash compactor shall be relocated within the loading dock. The trash compactor and baler shall be enclosed in a three -side structure. The walls shall be concrete _block or similar masonry construction. The roof shall be lightweight concrete roof or a plywood surface with concrete tiles; a built -up roof with 5'5" of insulation on the inside would be an acceptable alternative. The open side shall face away from residents. Doors may be on the side of the enclosure facing the residents, but must be closed when the baler or compactor are operating. The compactor and baler should only be operated between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM." The trash compactor /sanitizer has been enclosed on the north and south sides with an exterior metal panel system. The interior of the walls have been lined with Noise Foil Panels as recommended by the acoustical engineer. The roof was constructed of metal decking with a waterproof membrane and was constructed similar to the north and south walls and has a bellow material that wraps around the trash enclosure to allow for movement. The west wall of the compactor /sanitizer will be open for access. The west wall of the loading dock was lined from north to south with Noise Foil Panels as recommended by the acoustical engineer. The baler was constructed with three walls on the east, west and south sides. The north side will remain open for access. The roof of the baler enclosure was constructed with the same materials as the compactor /sanitizer roof structure as noted above. The compactor and baler are operated between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM. While Hoag is unable to fully relocate the trash compactor, per the Development Agreement Update City Council staff report dated September 14, 2010, staff notes: "Hoag has committed to relocate the trash compactor and provide a full enclosure as part of Hoag Hospital's construction of a new structure or structures on the Upper Campus requiring the transfer of buildable square footage from the Lower Campus or reconfiguration of the loading dock. In staff's opinion, this is a good faith partial and 41 substantial compliance with the Mitigation Measure 3.4 -6 for an interim period until such time when the trash compactor will be relocated and full compliance will be achieved as part of Hoag Hospital's construction of a new structure or structures on the Upper Campus requiring the transfer of buildable square footage from the Lower Campus or reconfiguration of the loading dock. " Therefore, Hoag is good faith partial and substantial compliance with this mitigation measure by constructing a trash compactor enclosure and a baler enclosure which include the use of sound absorption panels on both enclosures. These structures are complete and photos and permits are attached. (Attachment 6) Planned Community Requirements — Landscaping Lower Campus (Exhibit q6) Area 7a — West Parking Area Islands Requirement: 60 days after CDP issuance at Coastal Commission. Hoag received Coastal Commission's "Approval in Concept" of this item on April 8", 2009 and final permits were received on December 15, 2009. Hoag obtained the required building permits for this project on January 19, 2010. Parking Lot Islands were complete by May, 2010. Hoag has proceeded in good faith and will be in full compliance with the completion of construction as noted above. (Attachment 7) Area 9 — North. Slone above Retaining Wall Requirement: 120 days after CDP Issued by Coastal Commission. Hoag received Coastal Commission's "Approval in Concept" of this item on April 81h, 2009 and final permits were issued by the City of Newport Beach on January 19, 2010. The Slope construction was scheduled to commence on May 24, 2010, and was completed by July, 2010. Hoag has proceeded in good faith and is in full compliance with the completion of construction as noted above. (Attachment 7) Area 12 PCH Green Screen Requirement: Immediately upon issuance of an Approval in Concept by the City an application shall be submitted for said improvements to the Coastal Commission. Construction of said improvements shall be completed no later than 18 months after Coastal Development Permit Issuance by the Coastal Commission. Hoag received Coastal Commission's "Approval in Concept" of this item on April 8th, 2009 and final permits were issued by the City of Newport Beach on January 19, 2010. 42 Hoag has proceeded in good faith and is in full compliance with the completion of the PCH Green Screen construction as required. Pictures of the completed landscaping are attached. (Attachment 7) 4S Ca' Hoag Development Agreement 3rd Annual Review Table of (Contents Noise CoGen Weather station Mitigation Measures & PC Text Requirements g West Hoag Drive Sound 0 Loading Dock Sound Absorption Panels 5 (City & ®SP ®ID final Permit) Trash Compactor Mitigation b Lower Campus Slope & PCH Screen Landscape Phase Plan 7 45 :'lw TAB 1 NOISE ANALYSIS PA2009 -064 2011 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REVIEW NEWS 90 47 42 �S ACOUSTICS INC. Consultants in Architectural Acoustics and Noise Control 15751 Beaver Run Road Canyon Country, CA, 91387 P (661) 251 -3965 F (661) 310 -3783 HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA ACOUSTICAL MEASUREMENT PROGRAM TEST REPORT Prepared for: Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian One Hoag Road Newport Beach, CA 92658 Prepared by: RS Acoustics Inc This report presents the results of an acoustical noise measurement program conducted at the Hoag Merno- rial Hospital Presbyterian campus in Newport Beach, California. This report is part of an annual review to determine the current noise environment and whether implementation of noise mitigation measures have successfully achieved the design criterion for noise sources located within the Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian complex. 9 15751 Beaver Run Rd. Canyon Country, CA 91387 Phone: (661) 251 -3965 Fax: (661) 310 -3783 Date: 7 March 2011 Report No. 940211 This report presents the results of an acoustical noise measurement program conducted at the Hoag Merno- rial Hospital Presbyterian campus in Newport Beach, California. This report is part of an annual review to determine the current noise environment and whether implementation of noise mitigation measures have successfully achieved the design criterion for noise sources located within the Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian complex. 9 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Acoustical Measurement Test Program Report Page 2 Table of Contents Tille Section Page Executive Summary 1.0 3 Project Description 1.1 4 Community Noise Assessment Metrics 1.2 4 City of Newport Beach Noise Standards 1.3 5 Hoag Memorial Hospital Planned Community Development Criteria & District Regulations 1.4 7 Test Equipment 1.5 8 Ancillary Building and West Tower Mechanical Equipment 2.1 8 Ancillary Building Rooftop Mechanical Equipment 2.1.1 8 West Tower Mechanical Equipment Room 2.1.2 9 Main Loading Dock (Daytime) 2.2 10 West (Residential) Side of Acoustical Wall 2.2.1 10 East (Hospital) Side of Acoustical Wall 2.2.2 12 Main Loading Dock (Nighttime) 2.3 13 West (Residential) Side of Acoustical Wall 2.3.1 13 East (Hospital) Side of Acoustical Wall 2.3.2 13 Dietary Loading Dock Noise Levels & Activity 2.4 13 Daytime Noise Measurements & Activity 2.4.1 13 Nighttime Noise Levels & Activity 2.4.2 15 Cogeneration Facility Noise Levels & Activity 2.5 15 Daytime Noise Measurements & Activity 2.5.1 15 Nighttime Noise Levels & Activity 2.5.2 15 General Ambient Conditions 2.6 17 Catalina Drive & Old Newport Blvd. 2.6.1 18 Superior Avenue & Sunset View Park 2.6.2 19 Sunset View Park & West Hoag Road 2.6.3 19 200 Paris Lane - Villa Balboa Condominium Complex 2.7 20 Daytime Noise Measurements 2.7.1 20 Nighttime Noise Measurements 2.7.2 21 Measurements at 260 Cagney Lane Condominium — Unit 304 2.8 21 Daytime Noise Measurements 2.8.1 22 Nighttime Noise Measurements 2.6.2 24 Conclusion and Summary of Acoustical Testing Results 3.1 24 RS ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rd., Canyon Country, CA 91387 P (661) 251. -3965 F (661) 310.3783 150 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Acoustical Measurement Test Program Report Page 3 Acoustical tests were conducted on 22 and 23 February 2011 within the Hoag Hospital Memorial Presbyte- rian campus and also in the nearby community to determine the noise levels generated by the hospital op- erations relative to local and specific governing ordinances. Table I below shows the location of acoustical tests, the time of day, either day or night, and the results of the tests. The final column presents the governing ordinance which must be satisfied. WLE1 Summary of Acoustical Test Results Location of Acoustical Test Time Results Governing Ordinance Ancillary Building Rooftop Nighttime Pass Planned Community Development Criteria & District Equipment Regulations West Tower Mechanical Nighttime Pass Planned Community Development Criteria & District Room Equipment Regulations Daytime Pass Planned Community Development Criteria & District Main Loading Dock Regulations Nighttime Pass Planned Community Development Criteria & District Regulations Daytime Pass Planned Community Development Criteria & District Dietary Loading Dock Regulations Nighttime Pass Planned Community Development Criteria & District Regulations Cogeneration Facility Daytime Pass City of Newport Beach Noise Ordinance Nighttime Pass City of Newport Beach Noise Ordinance Environmental Ambient Con- Daytime Pass Noise ordinance not applicable. ditions Ni httime I Pass Noise ordinance not applicable. 200 Paris Lane Da ime I Pass Citv of New ort Beach Noise Ordinance Ni httime Pass City of Newport Beach Noise Ordinance Daytime Pass Planned Community Development Criteria & District Condominium 304 - 260 Re ulations Cagney Lane Planned Community Development Criteria & District Nighttime Pass Re ulations RS ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rd., Canyon Country, CA 91387 P (661) 251 -3965 F (661) 310.3783 152 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Acoustical Measurement Test Program Report Page 4 1,1 PROJECT DESCRIP Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian is located at One Hoag Drive in Newport Beach, California as shown on the vicinity map on Figure 1. The hospital campus is separated into two distinct planning sections de- scribed as the "Upper Campus" to the north, and the "Lower Campus" to the south. The Upper Campus section is bordered by Hospital Road to the north, West Hoag Drive to the west, New- port Boulevard (55) to the east, and a hospital multi -level parking structure extends south to the Newport Blvd. off -ramp connecting Newport Blvd. to Pacific Coast Highway. The Lower Campus section is bordered to the north by Sunset View Park and Villa Balboa townhomes, Su- perior Avenue to the west, Newport Blvd. to the east, and the southern boundary is bounded by Pacific Coast Highway (Highway 1). 1.2 COMMUNITY NOISE ASSESSMENT METRICS In general, community noise measurements or assessments refer to descriptions of the exterior noise envi- ronment in the vicinity of inhabited areas. Descriptions of noise usually include the time and spatial varia- tions in the outdoor noise environment throughout a specific area so that descriptions are relevant to the effect on people within the specified area. Outdoor noise environments vary greatly in magnitude and character among locations throughout a com- munity — from the quiet suburban areas bordering on farmland, to the din of traffic in downtown city streets. They generally vary with time of day, being relatively quiet at night when activities are minimal and noisier in morning and afternoons during peak traffic periods. Noise or unwanted sound is complex and may be comprised of a broad range of sounds often including low and high frequency components, which may also occur at differing decibel levels. To help simplify and quantify the human judgment of relative loudness and provide a simple single- number rating system, the A- weighting network was developed. A- weighted sound level "db(A)" is one of the most widely used methods of stating community noise design goals and regulations in terms of a single number rating system. A- weighted sound levels are obtained with a sound level meter incorporating an electronic weighting network that de- emphasizes the low frequency portions of the noise spectrum, to automatically compensate for the lower sensitivity of the human ear to low frequency sounds. High frequency components of sound, 1000FIz and above are relatively unchanged in A- weighting networks as the human ear is fairly equally sensitive to all sounds occurring in this high frequency range. The single A- weighted number is the sum of all A- weighted sound energy within a given range incor- porating (he 32Hz to 8000Hz octave bands. The City of Newport Beach, as is typical of other cities, utilizes A- weighted sound levels in (heir noise ordi- nance to quantify allowable noise levels which are averaged over a specific time period. This time compo- nent is specified to allow for varying noise conditions such as the fluctuating noise levels associated with vehicular traffic stopping or accelerating from an intersection, The resultant level would be the average of all sound levels measured within 111e stated time period. The noise ordinance of The City of Newport Beach requires that noise measurements be conducted and averaged over a 15 minute period, with a sound level meter set for a slow response averaging time. The result is termed a 15 minute L� ", (Equivalent Noise Level) and is measured and presented in A- weighted decibels levels. By definition, a 15 minute L, is the A- weighted sound level corresponding to a steady- state sound level containing the same total energy as a time - varying signal over the 15 minute period. RS ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rd., Canyon Country, CA 91387 P (661) 251 -3965 F (661) 310 -3783 .52 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Acoustical Measurement Test Program Report Page 5 For brief or short duration or impact sounds, the City of Newport Beach utilizes the Lm °, metric or Maximum Sound Level. This metric is also expressed in A- weighted decibels, and per the requirements of the ordi- nance is measured at the slow response averaging time. L„,,, noise levels quantity the highest sound level measured or recorded during a designated time interval or event. Vicinity Map i''ius CIC`t �' J Sr \ 11 ;it{ { CIA i r51 1_r 1 y s[ \fj. : I 15 minute L,, 55 dB (A) 50 dB (A) 75 dB (A) 70 dB (A) II Commercial 15 minute L,, 65 dB (A) 60 dB(A) Z�jfniYY1 85dBA sl��gr III Mixed Use Residential °° R� si: IT Ff ri. Sf�1 ° 80dBA �/r •,v�4�19"`i� lil Y. }a'� /i'aVBl i) VA ��� �b std g1�Ji7y, 'r : I A t 5R "1 V •j+ 6+ �U�pjJ �. Y/ �+'p /4 I L 90dBA I•�Y �,�`�fvX. .� HaIag.Memorlal Hoepii oil -- __ Prosbylerran v °,'°4u4� �,•tCS r s y�o a � i iii*u i IWILIA V. y A 101a�5: G ae 17 ............ Figure 1 1.3 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH NOISE STANDARDS 10.26.025 Exterior Noise Standards A. The following noise standards, unless otherwise specifically indicated, shall apply to all property within a designated noise zone: Noise Zone Type of Land Use Measuring Met- ric (A vrtd) Daytime Nighttime Allowable Exterior Ndao Level (Leq) 7:00 am -10:00 pm Allowable Exterior Noise Level (Leq) 10:00 pm - 7:00 am Single-, two -, or multiple- family resi- dential. 15 minute L,, 55 dB (A) 50 dB (A) 75 dB (A) 70 dB (A) II Commercial 15 minute L,, 65 dB (A) 60 dB(A) °L 85dBA 80dBA III Mixed Use Residential °° 15 minute L 60.dB A 50 dB (A) ° 80dBA 70dBA IV Industrial or Manufacturing 15 minute L 70 dB (A) 70 dB (A) 90dBA 90d8A RS ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rd., Canyon Country, CA 91387 P (661) 251 -3965 F (661) 310.3783 53 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Acoustical Measurement Test Program Report Page 6 10.26.030 Interior Noise Standards ° Lmax levels defined in B.2 below *" Residential properties within 100' of commercial property line defined in D. below. If the ambient noise level exceeds the resulting standard, the ambient shall be the standard. B. It is unlawful for any person at any location within the incorporated "area of the City to create any noise, or to allow the creation of any noise on property owned, leased, occupied or otherwise con trolled by such person, which causes the noise level when measured on any other property, to ex- ceed either of the following: 1. The noise standard for the applicable zone for any fifteen- minute period; 2. A maximum instantaneous noise level equal to the value of the noise standard plus twenty (20) DBA for any period of time (measured using A- weighted slow response). C. In the event the ambient noise level exceeds the noise standard the maximum allowable noise level under said category shall be increased to reflect the maximum ambient noise level. D: The Noise Zone III standard shall apply to that portion of residential property falling within one hun- dred (100) feet of a commercial property, if the intruding noise originates from that commercial property. E. If the measurement location is on boundary between two different noise zones, the lower noise level standard applicable to the noise zone shall apply. (Ord. 95 -53 § 1, 1995; Ord. 95 -38 § 11 (part), 1995) As discussed in the following section, the ordinance defines the locations where acoustical measurements are to be made to determine compliance with the noise standard criteria. 10.26.055 Noise Level Measurement A. The location selected for measuring exterior noise levels in a residential area shall be at any part of a private yard, patio, deck or balcony normally used for human activity and identified by the owner of the affected property as suspected of exceeding the noise level standard. This location may be the closest point in the private yard or patio, or on the deck or balcony, to the noise source, but should not be located in nonhuman activity areas such as trash container storage areas; planter beds, above or contacting a property line fence, or other areas not normally used as part of the yard, patio, deck or balcony. The location selected for measuring exterior noise levels in a nonresidential area shall be at the closest point to the noise source. The measurement microphone height shall be five feet above finish elevation or, in the case of a deck or balcony, the measurement microphone height shall be five feet above the finished floor level. B. The location selected for measuring interior noise levels shall be made within the affected residential unit. The measurements shall be made at a point at least four feet from the wall, ceiling or floor, or within the frame of a window opening, nearest the noise source. The measurements shall be made with windows in an open position. (Ord. 95 -38 § 11 (part), 1995) Special provisions for Heating, Venting and Air Conditioning equipment are provided for in the ordinance as follows: RS ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rd:, Canyon Country, CA 91.387 P (661) 251 -3965 F (661) 310.3783 �T Daytime Nighttime Noise Type of Land Use Measuring Metric Alowable Interior Allowable Interior Noise Zone (A -grid) Noise Level (Leq) 7:00 Level (1-4 10:00 pm - am -10:00 fern 7 :00 am I Residential. 15 Minute L, 45 dB (A) 40 dB (A) *L.11 65 dB (A) 60 dB (A) Residential portions of mixed use 15 minute 45 dB (A) 40 dB (A) III propedies "• " 65 dB (A) 60 dB(A) ° Lmax levels defined in B.2 below *" Residential properties within 100' of commercial property line defined in D. below. If the ambient noise level exceeds the resulting standard, the ambient shall be the standard. B. It is unlawful for any person at any location within the incorporated "area of the City to create any noise, or to allow the creation of any noise on property owned, leased, occupied or otherwise con trolled by such person, which causes the noise level when measured on any other property, to ex- ceed either of the following: 1. The noise standard for the applicable zone for any fifteen- minute period; 2. A maximum instantaneous noise level equal to the value of the noise standard plus twenty (20) DBA for any period of time (measured using A- weighted slow response). C. In the event the ambient noise level exceeds the noise standard the maximum allowable noise level under said category shall be increased to reflect the maximum ambient noise level. D: The Noise Zone III standard shall apply to that portion of residential property falling within one hun- dred (100) feet of a commercial property, if the intruding noise originates from that commercial property. E. If the measurement location is on boundary between two different noise zones, the lower noise level standard applicable to the noise zone shall apply. (Ord. 95 -53 § 1, 1995; Ord. 95 -38 § 11 (part), 1995) As discussed in the following section, the ordinance defines the locations where acoustical measurements are to be made to determine compliance with the noise standard criteria. 10.26.055 Noise Level Measurement A. The location selected for measuring exterior noise levels in a residential area shall be at any part of a private yard, patio, deck or balcony normally used for human activity and identified by the owner of the affected property as suspected of exceeding the noise level standard. This location may be the closest point in the private yard or patio, or on the deck or balcony, to the noise source, but should not be located in nonhuman activity areas such as trash container storage areas; planter beds, above or contacting a property line fence, or other areas not normally used as part of the yard, patio, deck or balcony. The location selected for measuring exterior noise levels in a nonresidential area shall be at the closest point to the noise source. The measurement microphone height shall be five feet above finish elevation or, in the case of a deck or balcony, the measurement microphone height shall be five feet above the finished floor level. B. The location selected for measuring interior noise levels shall be made within the affected residential unit. The measurements shall be made at a point at least four feet from the wall, ceiling or floor, or within the frame of a window opening, nearest the noise source. The measurements shall be made with windows in an open position. (Ord. 95 -38 § 11 (part), 1995) Special provisions for Heating, Venting and Air Conditioning equipment are provided for in the ordinance as follows: RS ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rd:, Canyon Country, CA 91.387 P (661) 251 -3965 F (661) 310.3783 �T Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Acoustical Measurement Test Program Report Page 7 10.26.045 Heating Venting and Air Conditioning - Special Provisions A. New HVAC Equipment. New permits for heating, venting and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment in or adjacent to residential areas shall be issued only where installations can be shown by computa- tion, based on the sound rating of the proposed equipment, not to exceed an A- weighted sound pressure level of fifty (50) dB(A) or not to exceed an A- weighted sound pressure level of fitly -five (55) dB(A) and be installed with a timing device that will deactivate the equipment during the hours of ten p.m. to seven a.m. The method of computation used shall be that specified in "Standard Application of Sound Rated Outdoor Unitary Equipment," Standard 275, Air conditioning and Refrigeration Insti- tute, 1984 or latest revision thereof. B. Existing HVAC Equipment. 1. HVAC equipment legally installed prior to April 22, 1981, shall be permitted to operate with an exterior noise limit of sixty-five (65) dB(A) until January 1, 1998. 2. HVAC equipment legally installed prior to April 22, 1981, shall be exempted from the interior noise level standard as specified in Section 10.26.030 of this chapter until January 1, 1998 3. HVAC equipment legally installed after April 22, 1981, and prior to the date of adoption of this chapter shall not exceed a maximum exterior noise limit of fifty-live (55) dBA during the ninety-day compliance period set forth in Section 10.26.005. C. In the event that HVAC equipment cannot meet the requirements set forth in this chapter, then the exterior noise limit for such equipment may be raised to sixty-five (65) dBA and exempted from the interior noise level standard as specified in Section 10.26.030 of this chapter, provided that the ap- plicant obtains the written consent of all the owners of the affected properties. (Ord. 95 -38 § 11 (part), 1995) 1.4 HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA & DISTRICT REGULATIONS Amendment to Restated Develooment Agreement Paragraph 1.17 Noise Limitation The existing Planned Community (PC Text) provides that noise generated from Hoag Hospital from new me- chanical appurtenances shall not exceed 55 dB(A) at the property lines. This noise limitation was estab- lished prior to the adoption of the City's Noise Element in the General Plan and Noise Ordinance. It is pro- posed that noise generated and originating from the Property be governed by the city Noise Ordinance with certain exceptions. Planned Community Development Criteria and District Regulations M. Noise Standards Noise generated at the Hoag Hospital property shall be governed by the City of Newport Beach Noise Ordi- nance, except as noted below for the Loading Dock Area. 1. The applicable noise standard at the Hoag Hospital property line adjacent to the loading dock area shall be as follows: 2. Within the Loading Dock Area during daytime hours, vehicles shall be exempt from applica- ble noise standards as listed above. RS ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rd., Canyon Country, CA 91387 P (661) 251.3965 F (661) 910 -3783 .5S 7:00 am - 10:00 p m. 10:00 Prn - 7:00 am Daytime Nighttime 15.min 65 dB(A) 55 dBA 2. Within the Loading Dock Area during daytime hours, vehicles shall be exempt from applica- ble noise standards as listed above. RS ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rd., Canyon Country, CA 91387 P (661) 251.3965 F (661) 910 -3783 .5S Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Acoustical Measurement Test Program Report Page 8 Vehicle idling shall be prohibited on West Hoag Drive and within the loading dock areas, except that refrigerated vehicles may idle while at the loading clocks when refrigeration is necessary. In addition, the grease pit cleaning which is exempt from the City Noise Ordinance as a maintenance activity shall occur on a Saturday between the hours of 11:00 am and 3:00 pm. 1.6 TEST EQUIPMENT Noise levels measurements were conducted with the following equipment which was calibrated immediately prior to and following the test procedures: • Larson Davis Type 824 Type 'I integrating one -third octave band sound level meter • Larson Davis Model PRM902 microphone preamplifier • Larson Davis Type CAL200 precision Class 1 sound level calibrator calibrated to a reference traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology. • Larson Davis Type 2560'/2" microphone accepted to meet the specifications of IEC 60651 and ANSI S1.4 -1983 Type 1. The measurement equipment satisfies the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Standard 1.4 for Type 1 precision sound level measurements. 2.1 ANCILLARY BUILDING AND WEST TOWER MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT Noise level measurements of the Ancillary building rooftop mechanical equipment and West Tower me- chanical equipment room were conducted on 23 April 2011 starting at 1:00 am when the influence of offsite noise sources and traffic is reduced. In order to measure the worst case noise levels, we utilized a 35' tele- scoping microphone stand to elevate the measuring microphone to an elevation intersecting the rooftop equipment and the upper level condominium residences which have a fairly direct line of sight to the rooftop. Measurements were conducted at the west curb of on West Floag Drive nearest the property line. 2.1.1 Ancillary Building Rooftop Mechanical Equipment The intruding noise levels from offsite sources were often equal to, or exceeded the noise levels gen- erated by the mechanical equipment under test. To the degree possible, the test sequence was manually paused during these offsite occurrences however the test results presented herein are based on a fully integrated 15 minute sampling. See Figure 2 for test location. It is our understanding that all four (4) kitchen grease exhaust fans in the rooftop penthouse were op- erating during our test however was not verified. The balance of the rooftop equipment including con- densers and multiple mushroom exhaust fans were also operating. The noise levels from the mechanical equipment were constant over 111e duration of the test and were the primary contributor to the ambient environment. The noise levels were measured to be L,q 50.3 dB(A) and the maximum noise level recorded was Lm;, 53.7 dB(A). CONCLUSION The ancillary building rooftop mechanical noise levels are regulated by the Hoag Memorial Hospital Planned Community Development Criteria & District Regulations (PC Text) which require that noise levels in this area do not exceed Leq 55 dB(A) during the nighttime hours of 10:00 pm to 7:00 am. Our RS ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rd., Canyon Country, CA 91387 P (661) 251 -3965 F (661) 310.3783 50 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Acoustical Measurement Test Program Report Page 9 measurements resulted in noise levels of L� 50.3 dB(A) which satisfies the L� 55 dB(A) maximum al- lowable noise level requirement. The language within the Hoag Hospital PC Text noise standards do not include requirements for maximum allowable Lm„ noise levels however are included in this report for information only. Figure 2 2.1.2 West Tower Mechanical Equipment Room As with measurements of the ancillary building rooflop equipment, intruding noise levels from offsile sources were often excessive and to the degree possible, the test sequence was manually paused during these offsite occurrences however the lest results were based on a fully integrated 15 minute sampling. See Figure 3 for acoustical testing location. There is an uninterrupted and direct line of sight between the measurement position on the roadbed and the west facing louvers serving the mechanical room. However to reduce any potential effects of relleclions and directivity, we utilized a 35' telescoping microphone stand to elevate the measuring microphone to an elevation close to the louvers and to the upper level condominium residences which also have a fairly direct line of sight to the louvers. The noise levels generated by the mechanical room resulted in L., 49.5 dB(A) with the maximum noise level being Lm„ 51.8 dB(A). Noise from louvers serving the equipment room was slightly audible however we did not verity the equipment within the mechanical room that was operating during our test. 2S ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rd., Canyon Country, CA 91387 P (661) 251 -3965 F (661) 310.3783 57 tt p 1 ` .�alYir Ancillary J lid • 1 1 I/ . 0 • �1i C s „� N. ': '�7 '7777777777 '7 =�� 7777 •, .on���L�. eea...Co7.7oC...�..�C..7.a7�. . Figure 2 2.1.2 West Tower Mechanical Equipment Room As with measurements of the ancillary building rooflop equipment, intruding noise levels from offsile sources were often excessive and to the degree possible, the test sequence was manually paused during these offsite occurrences however the lest results were based on a fully integrated 15 minute sampling. See Figure 3 for acoustical testing location. There is an uninterrupted and direct line of sight between the measurement position on the roadbed and the west facing louvers serving the mechanical room. However to reduce any potential effects of relleclions and directivity, we utilized a 35' telescoping microphone stand to elevate the measuring microphone to an elevation close to the louvers and to the upper level condominium residences which also have a fairly direct line of sight to the louvers. The noise levels generated by the mechanical room resulted in L., 49.5 dB(A) with the maximum noise level being Lm„ 51.8 dB(A). Noise from louvers serving the equipment room was slightly audible however we did not verity the equipment within the mechanical room that was operating during our test. 2S ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rd., Canyon Country, CA 91387 P (661) 251 -3965 F (661) 310.3783 57 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian CONCLUSION Acoustical Measurement Test Program Report Page 10 The noise levels from the second floor mechanical equipment room in the West Tower are regulated by the Hoag Hospital PC Text which require that noise levels in (his area do not exceed Leq 55 dB(A) during the nighttime hours of 10:00 pm to 7:00 am. Our measurements resulted in noise levels of Leq 49.5 dB(A) which satisfies the L, 55 dB(A) maximum allowable noise level requirement. 2.2 MA1N'LOADING DOCK (DAYTIME) Measurements were conducted of loading dock noise and activity on 22 February 2011 between the morn- ing hours of 8:00 am to 11:00 am. Measurements were conducted at both the west (residential side) and east (hospital side) of the acoustical barrier. 2.2.1 West (Residential) Side of Acoustical Wall Two (2) separate measurement locations on the residential side of the wall were conducted at both 5' and 15' elevations to show the effective range of acoustical shielding of hospital noise being provided by the acoustical barrier. Typical dock activity such as operation of the cardboard compactor, voices, and hammering gener- ated by construction of the cardboard compactor noise control enclosure was slightly audible at the residential side of the acoustical wall. Trucks arriving and departing were also discernable. During RS ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rd„ Canyon Country, CA 91387 P (661) 251.3965 F (661) 310 -3763 52 �jk • Y 1 ` d Acoustical measure ment position ll , y4 �rF�;iF ` 1w i :• (�) i• Y/ 1'YI �� s �n IV i 11 ■ ■ ■�`� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■- ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ „ ■■■ I\1■■ ■■■.■■■■■■■■ ■C■■■ ■■ r� 2.2 MA1N'LOADING DOCK (DAYTIME) Measurements were conducted of loading dock noise and activity on 22 February 2011 between the morn- ing hours of 8:00 am to 11:00 am. Measurements were conducted at both the west (residential side) and east (hospital side) of the acoustical barrier. 2.2.1 West (Residential) Side of Acoustical Wall Two (2) separate measurement locations on the residential side of the wall were conducted at both 5' and 15' elevations to show the effective range of acoustical shielding of hospital noise being provided by the acoustical barrier. Typical dock activity such as operation of the cardboard compactor, voices, and hammering gener- ated by construction of the cardboard compactor noise control enclosure was slightly audible at the residential side of the acoustical wall. Trucks arriving and departing were also discernable. During RS ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rd„ Canyon Country, CA 91387 P (661) 251.3965 F (661) 310 -3763 52 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Acoustical Measurement Test Program Report Page 11 our measurements, of(site noise from commercial and general aviation over - flights, and occasional traffic noise from PCH was audible. Position 1 as shown in Figure 4, was located midway between the acoustical wall and the face of the condominium building. At the 5' elevation we measured 67.6 dB(A) L,,, and the 15 minute average noise level of 53.2 dB(A) L. was recorded. At the 15' elevation, we measured 65.2 dB(A) Lma, and the 15 minute average noise level of 52.6 dB(A) Le, was recorded. Position 2 was located approximately 10' from the face of the condominium building, At the 5' eleva- tion we measured 61.8 dB(A) L,,,u and the 15 minute average noise level of 51.6 dB(A) L., was re- corded. At the 15' elevation, we measured 63.8 dB(A) L,,,,, and the 15 minute average noise level of 51.4 dB(A) L. was recorded. ri lef r } �t \ �y \ r, �\ \ �� I p Ly i �i ••SS Nil 1<rluM(y tN, SQi� FYri tom, ,Measurement pi• fsidons ` residential side of acoustical 61_ above • • � wall I �. r' I t �, . yF rdc S11 ',tiv \t \ fit, I L �� 1 :<> � • - ;rte - �� � , � ...::� — .r 1 MEN 9 :99999 9: 11 MENEM � OMNI11 •1 1 i .1 Figure 4 RS ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rd., Canyon Country, CA 91367 P (661) 251 -3965 F (661) 310.3763 159 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Acoustical Measurement Test Program Report Page 12 CONCLUSION. Loading dock activity noise levels are regulated by the Floag Hospital PC Text which require that noise levels from the loading clock area do not exceed Leq 65 dB(A) during the daytime hours of 7:00 am to 10:00 pm. Our measurements resulted in noise levels measured at the residential side of the acousli- cal barrier ranging from Leq 51.4 dB(A) to L.q 53.2 dB(A) which satisfies the Leq 65 dB(A) maximum al- lowable noise level requirement. 2.2.2 East (Hospital) Side of Acoustical Wall One (1) measurement position was conducted at the hospital side of the barrier on the curb of West Hoag Drive directly across from the loading dock. The measuring microphone was located at an ele- vation of 5' above the road bed for the entirety of the measurement program. See Figure 5. During our measurements at the hospital side of the acoustical wall, dock - related noise and activity included deliveries, compactor operation and pallelizing cardboard, forklift operation, and carts rolling on the dock. Hammering by construction of the compactor noise control enclosure did not occur dur- ing these measurements. Additionally, two (2) medium trucks entered the dock from the north along West Hoag Drive. The maximum noise level was observed to be 88.3 dB(A) L,,a, which occurred during a truck delivery. The 15 minute average noise level of 58.8 dB(A) Leq was recorded. �. s � a s ,1,.. (1 1��'g�GG` } �`1i � - y {� � ►r y:�"' • Nst rd's..' \s t y ( . • • I • P�"" s 1 5 k M. r 07'1 .Y14r Y rr . i• • •. 1 �vl �_ i1 a �� 1 N� cr�y 1.. r � G ♦ J S !. t .dfDe NONE so . �. e MMM r RS ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rd., Canyon Country, CA 91387 P (661) 251 -3965 F (661) 310 -3783 00 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Acoustical Measurement Test Program Report Page 13 Acoustical measurements near the loading dock at both sides of the acoustical barrier were conducted on 22 February 2011 starting at 10:00 pm. As the loading dock is closed during the nighttime hours, the pre- dominant noise source was offsite traffic, and to a lesser degree mechanical equipment at the hospital. 2.3.1 West (Residential) Side of Acoustical Wall As with the daytime tests; two (2) separate measurement locations on the residential side of the will were conducted at both 5' and 15' elevations. During our measurements, minor offsite noise from commercial aviation, and occasional traffic noise from PCH was audible. See Figure 4 for acoustical testing location. Position 1 was located midway between the acoustical wall and the face of the condominium building. At the 5' elevation we measured 50.6 dB(A) L,,, and the 15 minute average noise level of 44.4 dB(A) Leq was recorded. At the 15' elevation, we measured 66.1 dB(A) Lm„ and the 15 minute average noise level of 45.4 dB(A) Lq was recorded. Also shown in Figure 4, Position 2 was located approximately 10' from the face of the condominium building. At the 5' elevation we measured 55.5 dB(A) L,,,,, and the 15 minute average noise level of 44.5 dB(A) Leq was recorded. At the 15' elevation, we measured 57.13 dB(A) L,,„ and the 15 minute average noise level of 44.4 dB(A) L. was recorded. CONCLUSION Noise levels in this area are regulated by the Hoag Hospital PC Text which require that noise levels from the loading dock area do not exceed Lq 55 dB(A) during the nighttime hours of 10:00 pm to 7:00 am. Our measurements resulted in noise levels measured at the residential side of the acousti- cal barrier ranging from L,, 44.4 dB(A) to Leq 45.4 dB(A) which satisfies the Leq 65 dB(A) maximum al- lowable noise level requirement. 2.3.2 East (Hospital) Side of Acoustical Wall The loading dock is closed during the nighttime hours. During our measurement, minor offsite traffic noise from PCH was audible, along with an exhaust or intake fan located in the south side of the West Tower. One (1) measurement position, shown in Figure 5, was conducted at the hospital side of the barrier at the curb of West Hoag Drive directly across from the loading dock. The measuring microphone was located at an elevation of 5' above the road bed for the entirety of the measurement program. At the east side of the barrier along the curb of Hoag Road, we measured noise levels of 54.5 dB(A) L,,,,,, and a 15 minute average of 51.4 dB(A) Lq were recorded. 2.4 DIETARY LOADING DOCK NOISE LEVELS & ACTIVITY 2.4,1 Daytime Noise Measurements & Activity Measurements were conducted on 22 February 2011 at approximately 11:00 am. Our measurement location was at the western curb of West Hoag Drive directly across from file dietary loading dock. The measuring microphone was located at an elevation of 5' above the road bed for the entirety of the measurement program. See Figure 6 for acoustical testing location. RS ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rd., Canyon Country, CA 91387 P (661) 251 -3965 F (661) 310 -3783 01 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Acoustical Measurement Test Program Report Page 14 Activity at the dietary dock during our measurement included one truck backing into the clock, conver- sation between workers inside the highly reverberant and enclosed dock were audible, an ambulance and fire truck exiting the hospital north towards Hospital Road, and off -site traffic on Hospital Road and Newport Blvd. A large delivery truck southbound on West Hoag Road drove past our measure- ment location and thus was included in the measurement results. We measured a 15 minute L., 63.9 dB(A), with a maximum recorded level of L.., 88.5 dB(A) which was generated by the large truck on West Hoag Road in close proximity to the microphone. CONCLUSION Noise levels in this area are regulated by the Hoag Hospital PC Text which require that noise levels from the Dietary loading dock do not exceed L., 65 dB(A) during the daytime hours of 7:00 am to RS ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rd., Canyon Country, CA 91387 P (661) 251 -3965 F (661) 310 -3783 02 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Acoustical Measurement Test Program Report Page 15 10:00 pm. Our measurements resulted in noise levels measured at the curb nearest the property line across from the Dietary dock was L. 63.9 dB(A) which satisfies the L,, 65 dB(A) maximum allowable noise level requirement. 2.4.2 Nighttime Noise Measurements & Activity Nighttime noise level measurements were conducted on 23 February beginning at 12:30 am. Our measurement location was at the western curb of West Hoag Drive directly across from the dietary loading dock. The measuring microphone was located at an elevation of 5' above the road bed for the entirely of the measurement program. Predominant background noise levels observed near the dietary dock area were primarily from off -site traffic on Hospital Road and Newport Blvd. Mechanical equipment could also be heard in the back- ground. Our measurements resulted in a 15 minute L,, 47.8 dB(A), with a maximum recorded level of L,, 84.2 dB(A) generated by a hospital staff member working within the loading dock. CONCLUSION Noise levels in this area are regulated by the Hoag Hospital PC Text which require that noise levels from the Dietary loading dock do not exceed Lm 55 dB(A) during the nighttime hours of 10:00 pm to 7:00 am. Our measurements resulted in noise levels measured at the curb nearest the properly line across from the Dietary dock was L.,r 47.8 dB(A) which satisfies the L., 55 dB(A) maximum allowable noise level requirement. 2,5 COGENERATION FACILITY NOISE LEVELS AND ACTIVITY As shown in Figure 7, measurements were conducted on Sunset View Park at approximately 10' from the south face of the condominium building located at 200 Paris Lane. The measuring microphone was located at an elevation of 4' above the road bed and also at 20' above the road bed during the measurements. Measurements conducted at the 4' -0" elevation determine the noise level exposure at the lower first floor condominium units which benefit from the acoustical shielding provided by the hospital cogeneration build- ing and existing topography. The noise levels measured at 20' determine the noise levels experienced at the third floor of the condominiums which may have a direct line -of -sight to the hospital cooling lowers and minimal acoustical shielding effects. These upper floor units would experience the greatest noise impact from the cooling lowers. We observed that two (2) of the cooling towers in the cogeneration facility were operational during our tests and the installation of an acoustical barrier at the north end of the cooling tower building. 2.5.1 Daytime Noise Measurements & Activity Measurements were conducted on 22 February 2011 during the hours of 9:00 am to 10:00 am. Dur- ing the daytime measurements, the preponderance of ambient noise experienced was due to traffic On the nearby Superior Avenue and to a lesser degree from traffic on Pacific Coast Highway. Except during the quietest moments when traffic (low on Superior was controlled by the signal at Pacific Coast Highway, noise from the cooling towers and cogeneration facility was inaudible. With the microphone located at a 4' elevation above the roadbed, we measured L, 53.3 dB(A) for a 15 minute duration and the maximum level recorded was L,,,a, 80.1 dB(A) due to offsite traffic. With the microphone raised to the higher 20' elevation, we measured Lm 58.1 dB(A) with a maximum re- corded level of L,,,,, 82.6 dB(A) from offsite traffic noise. RS ACOUSTICS INC. 18751 Beaver Run Rd., Canyon Country, CA 91387 P (661) 251 -3965 F (661) 310 -3783 o3 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian CONCLUSION Acoustical Measurement Test Program Report Page '16 Noise levels in this area are regulated by the City of Newport Beach Noise Ordinance which require that noise levels do not exceed L.60 dB(A) during the day due to hospital operations. Maximum lev- els must not exceed L.., 80 dB(A) during the daytime from hospital operations. This section of the residential area is located within 100' from the Hoag Hospital property line and therefore would be considered as Zone III - "Mixed -Use Residential" With two (2) cooling towers operating, the measured noise levels of L,q 53.3 dB(A) at the 4' elevation and L. 58.1 dB(A) at the 20' elevation satisfy the City of Newport Beach Noise Ordinance. The worst case L,,,,, 80.1 dB(A) measured at 4' above the roadbed and L„,,, 82.6 dB(A) measured at 20' above the roadbed were generated by offsite sources and therefore would not be considered in the City Noise Ordinance regarding control on mechanical equipment noise from the hospital opera- tions. An accurate measurement of the cogeneration facility cooling lowers must be measured during the nighttime hours when offsite noise is minimal. 2.5.2 Nighttime Noise Measurements & Activity Measurements were conducted on 23 February 2011 starting at 2:00 am at the same location as the daytime measurements as shown on Figure 7. During the nighttime measurements of the cogeneration facility, the ambient noise levels experienced was primarily traffic noise on PCH, waves crashing at the beach, and the cooling towers within the cogeneration facility. The intruding noise levels from offsite sources were often equal to, or exceeded the noise levels gen- erated by the mechanical equipment under test. To the degree possible, testing sequences were manually paused during these offsile occurrences however the test results were based on a fully inte- grated 15 minute sampling. With the microphone located at a 4' elevation above the roadbed, we measured L.q 47.0 dB(A) for a 15 minute duration and the maximum level recorded was L,,,a, 47.9 dB(A). With the microphone raised to the higher 20' elevation, we measured L., 48.7 dB(A) with a maximum recorded level of L., 50.2 dB(A). CONCLUSION Noise levels in this area are regulated by the City of Newport Beach Noise Ordinance which require that noise levels do not exceed L. 50 dB(A) during the night due to hospital operations. Maximum levels must not exceed L.,, 70 dB(A) during the nighttime from hospital operations. With two (2) cooling towers operating, the measured noise levels of Lzq 47.0 dB(A) at the 4' elevation and L. 48.7 dB(A) at the 20' elevation satisfy the L�q 50 dB(A) allowable noise level requirement of the City of Newport Beach Noise Ordinance during nighttime hours. The worst case L,,,,, 47.9 dB(A) measured at 4' above the roadbed and L,,,a, 50.2 dB(A) measured at 20' above the roadbed also satisfy the City of Newport Beach maximum allowable L.., 70 dB(A) noise standard. RS ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rd., Canyon Country, CA 91387 P (661) 251 -.3965 F (661) 310 -3783 04 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Acoustical Measurement Test Program Report Page 17 F We 4•"' Z�r '+.,1Sa j' ...... 1 r34 �x aJi3c.. / > ✓, 1 - ... 1 . 1 .. - 1 $�rit sue. ua/ 'u� ��� u F - R _tr1 !! 7 5t r • 1I RVA •- „IIIII�III��:i�•111111��1111 1 :: ,11 1111 � 111��l1 111 11111�1� mgure i 216 GENERAL AMBIENT CONDITIONS To illustrate the general noise environment in and around the hospital, daytime and nighttime ambient noise measurements were conducted on 22 February 2011 at the locations shown described below. The purpose of these measurements is to document the current conditions and track any changes over time. The noise levels measured in these locations are primarily from traffic sources and aircraft operations only. Specific hospital equipment and on -site operations were of loo great a distance and were not contributory to these measurements. RS ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rd., Canyon Country, CA 91387 P (661) 251.3965 F (661) 310 -3783 C�15 , f 1, I F04 0 f "VIM 4, illl' f 0 E .1 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Acoustical Measurement Test Program Report Page 19 2.6.2 Superior Avenue & Sunset View Park Measurements were conducted at Superior Avenue & Sunset View Park as shown in Figure 9. Ambi- ent noise levels were from traffic on Superior Avenue and to a lesser degree from traffic accelerating from the stop light at Superior Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway. Occasional conversations from people walking along Sunset View Park were also included in our measurements. Nighttime tests began at 6:00 am, and daytime tests started at 10:00 am. Table 2.6.2,a n Pop.ml Amhiant Cnnrlitinnc Measurement location 0a 'me Ni httime L L, Superior Ave. and Sunset View Park 1 61.6 1 65.0 60.2 76.3 2,6.3 Sunset View Park & West Hoag Road Measurements were conducted at Sunset View Park & West Hoag Road as shown in Figure 10. Am- bient noise levels were from traffic on Pacific Coast Highway, minor traffic along West Hoag Road, and vehicles within the nearby parking garage. Nighttime tests began at 5:30 am, and daytime tests started at 10:30 am. RS ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rd., Canyon Country, CA 91387 P (661) 251 -3965 F (661) 310 -3783 07 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Acoustical Measurement Test Program Report Page 20 Table 2.6.3.a General Ambient Conditions Measurement Location Da ime NI htil 0 L Sunset View Park and West Hoag Road 55.6 1 67.4 1 52.3 1 67.6 Per Term 3 of the Settlement Agreement between Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian and Villa Balboa Community Association, noise shall be measured at 200 Paris Lane annually to verify compliance with the City of Newport Beach Noise Ordinance of the Municipal Code Chapter 10.26. A specific location for the acoustical measurements is not discussed within the Settlement Agreement. Noise level measurements within the Villa Balboa complex were conducted during the daytime and nighttime hours on 22 February 2011 at the location shown in Figure 11. 2.7.1 Daytime Noise Measurements Daytime measurements were conducted at 1:40 pm at the emergency exit gate immediately east of the 200 Paris Lane condominium. With the microphone located at a 4' elevation above the roadbed, we measured L,q 53.9 dB(A) for a 15 minute duration and the maximum level recorded was L,,, 67.9 dB(A). RS ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rd., Canyon Country, CA 91387 P (661) 251 -3965 F (661) 310 -3783 r�-_ 12 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Acoustical Measurement Test Program Report Page 21 The general ambient noise consisted of traffic noise from Pacific Coast Highway and to a lesser de- gree, Superior Avenue. Automobile noise from within a parking garage of the Villa Balboa complex was occasionally audible. Mechanical equipment noise from Hoag Hospital was not identifiable. 2.7.2 Nighttime Noise Measurements Nighttime noise measurements were conducted at 10:15 pm, also at the exit gate east of the 200 Paris Lane condominium. With the microphone located at a 4' elevation above the roadbed, we measured q 42.0 dB(A) for a 15 minute duration with the maximum recorded level of L, 60.4 dB(A). General ambient noise was from traffic on Superior Avenue. Acoustical shielding provided by the condominium buildings provided sufficient noise reduction to reduce mechanical equipment noise from the hospital cogeneration facility to inaudibility. CONCLUSION The noise levels measured at this location were generated by offsile sources and therefore would not be considered in the City Noise Ordinance regarding control on mechanical equipment noise from the hospital operations. Measurement data collected however is presented relative to the levels specified in [lie noise ordinance. Noise levels in this area are regulated by the City of Newport Beach Noise Ordinance which require that noise levels do not exceed LM 50 dB(A) during the nighttime hours, and Lq 60 dB(A) during the daytime due to hospital operations. Maximum levels must not exceed L,,,,, 60 dB(A) during the day- time and L,,,a, 70 dB(A) during the nighttime from hospital operations. With two (2) cooling towers operating, the noise levels of Lq 53.9 dB(A) measured during the day and L,q 42.0 dB(A) measured during the nighttime hours both satisfy the L, 60 dB(A) daytime and L,q 50 dB(A) nighttime allowable noise level requirement of the City of Newport Beach Noise Ordinance. The worst case Lm„ 67.9 dB(A) measured during the daytime and L.. 60.4 dB(A) measured during the nighttime hours also satisfy the City of Newport Beach maximum allowable L,,, 00 dB(A) daytime and L. 70 dB(A) nighttime allowable noise level requirement of the City of Newport Beach Noise Or- dinance: kv,119101MIMI 1101171! Daytime and nighttime noise level measurements at residential Unit 304 on 260 Cagney Lane were con- ducted on 22 February 2011 to determine the noise environment on the exterior balcony which faces east towards the hospital, as also within the unit's interior. This unit is located on the third floor of the condominium building, was fully furnished, and the living room has a direct line of sight to the rooftop mechanical equipment as well as to the louvers located in the west wall of the second story mechanical equipment room of the West Tower. The balcony is exposed to rooftop mechanical equipment as well as the hospital loading docks. The windows and the sliding glass door leading to the balcony of the condominium had been recently re- placed with new thermal glass units. The new assemblies were not marked or identilied with the installed glass thickness or composition. See Figure 12 for acoustical testing locations. RS ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rd., Canyon Country, CA 91387 P (661) 251.3965 F (661) 310 -3783 a Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian 200 Pads Acoustical Acoustical Measurement Test Program Report Page 22 Acoustical Measurement Position 200 Paris Lane c a so c 60 O U 40 20 0 45 47 49 51 200 Paris Lane - Daytime 300 g c 200 o Q ) 100 0 HE 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73 75 Sound Pressure Levels - dB(A) 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 200 Paris Lane - Nighttime Sound Pressure Levels - dB(A) 11 2.8.1 Daytime Noise Measurements Measurements were conducted at 12:45 pm on 22 February 2011 on the unit's exterior balcony, and at 1:30 pm within the unit's living room with the windows facing east closed. For the balcony measurements, the microphone was located at an elevation of 5' above the balcony floor, and equal to the plane of the condominium building facing east towards the hospital. Background noise levels on the balcony were primarily from off -site traffic, general activity at the hos- pital including hospital staff in the outdoor eating area, and hospital mechanical equipment. The doors between the outdoor eating area and the hospital cafeteria were unusually noisy when allowed to slam closed, most probably due to the automatic closers misadjusted. RS ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rtl„ Canyon Country, CA 91387 P (661) 251 -3965 F (661) 310.3783 70 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Acoustical Measurement Test Program Report Page 23 On the balcony, we measured a 15 minute L,, 60.6 dB(A) from the multiple sources, with a maximum recorded level of L., 82.6 dB(A). Interior measurements were conducted at a location in the interior living room, approximately 5' from the east exterior wall. General exterior noise sources were difficult to accurately distinguish within the unit when the windows are closed, Interior noise level measurements resulted in a 15 minute L,q 35.3 dB(A), and a maximum level of Lm„ 47.2 dB(A) with the windows closed. CONCLUSION Noise levels in this area are regulated by the Hoag Hospital PC Text which require that noise levels from the hospital do not exceed L,q 65 dB(A) during the daytime hours of 7:00 am to 10:00 pin. The noise levels measured on the balcony facing the hospital were L,, 60.6 dB(A), which satisfies [lie L,a RS ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rd.. Canyon Country, CA 91387 P (661) 251.3965 F (661) 310.3783 71 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Acoustical Measurement Test Program Report Page 24 2.8.2 Nighttime Noise Measurements Measurements were also conducted in Unit 304's exterior balcony and within the unit's living room during the evening. Measurements were scheduled to start at 11:00 pm however the units tenant re- quest they be started earlier, they began at 9:00 pm. Measurement positions were at the same loca- tions as the earlier daytime positions and are shown on Figure 12. Noise levels measured on the balcony were primarily from off -site traffic and mechanical equipment operating on the hospital rooftop. On the balcony, we measured a 15 minute L, 51.7 dB(A), with a maximum recorded level of Lm„ 63.4 dB(A). Exterior - generated noise sources were measured in the units living room at the same location as the earlier daytime tests. Exterior noise sources were difficult to accurately distinguish within the unit when the windows are closed. Interior noise level measurements resulted in a 15 minute L, 342 dB(A), and a maximum level of Lmar 48.1 dB(A) with the windows closed. CONCLUSION Noise levels in this area are regulated by the Hoag Hospital PC Text which require that noise levels from the hospital do not exceed Leq 55 dB(A) during the nighttime hours of 10:00 pm to 7:00 am. The noise levels measured on the balcony facing the hospital were L, 51.7 dB(A), which satisfies the L., 55 dB(A) maximum allowable noise level requirements of the PC Text. 3.1 CONCLUSION AND SUMMARY OF ACOUSTICAL TESTING RESULTS The results of all acoustical measurements included the noise reduction mitigation measures installed to date at the hospital complex. While not an exhaustive list, visible noise control devices installed at the hospi- tal areas follows: • Noise control penthouse constructed on the ancillary building roof to control noise of recently replaced kitchen exhaust fans. • Acoustical barrier wall constructed at perimeter of ancillary building to acoustically shield the nearby residential condominiums. • Acoustical louvers and other noise control devices installed within the West Tower second floor mechanical room • Sound absorbing panels installed at the wall surfaces of the loading dock. • Acoustical barrier wall approximately 20' ± tall constructed along West Hoag Road to shield residential condominiums from noise generated by hospital operations. • Under construction is a noise control enclosure for the cardboard compactor located in the loading dock parking lot. The mitigation measures currently installed have sufficiently reduced hospital - generated noise to satisfy the applicable City of Newport Beach Noise Ordinance, and the Hoag Memorial Hospital Planned Community Development Criteria & District Regulations. RS ACOUSTICS INC. 15751 Beaver Run Rd., Canyon Country,. CA 91387 P (661) 251 -3965 F (661) 310 -3783 72 rra�: COGEN WEATHER STATIONREPORTS PA2009 -064 2011 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REVIEW March 24, 2011 Mr. Gregg Zoll Senior Project Manager Facilities Design and Construction Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian 500 Superior Ave., Ste 300 Newport Beach, CA, 92663 Re: City Mitigation Measure — Cogen Operation Review Progress Report November 18, 2010 — March 19, 2011 Period Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA Dear Gregg: / [omPMY �Y Y We have completed our review of the Cooling Tower Curtailment Reports for the period of November 18, 2010 through March, 19, 2011. Reference attachments, period summary, path forward and conclusions follow: RFFFRFNCF: AI IACIIMFNIS 1. Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Operations Protocol 2. Cooling Tower Curtailment Reports November 18, 2010 — March 19, 2011 Period 3. Energy Management Control System, Cogen Plume Mitigation Flow Diagram B. PkRIOD SUMMARY (Novombor 18, 2010, through March 19, 2011) 1. Ongoing monitoring, [rending and documentation (electronic and hard copy) of local weather conditions including temperature, humidify, precipitation, wind speed and direction via a solar powered weather station (installed summer 2008). 2. Based on monitored weather conditions — ongoing 2417 advance notification to operators of pending weather conditions that may cause a plume to form. 3. Ongoing Cogeneration Plant and cooling tower load curtailment and load shifting in accordance with Section 8.5 of the amended DA. 4. Scheduling of Cogeneration Plant equipment maintenance periods to coincide with November 2010 through April 2011 curtailment period, as deemed appropriate 5. For the period of November 18, 2010 through March 19, 2011, the Cogeneration Plant's effective heat rejection was reduced by 33 percent minimum to curtail plume formation. X -nlh I wvAv.x_nth.corn 1510.668.0996 1035 Cadelon Street, STE 200, Berkeley, CA 94710 715 C. PAIII FORWARD Continue reporting and documentation. Summary in period Executive Summary. 2. Continue monitoring in documentation for the remainder of March and April 2011. 3. November 2011 - April 2012 period monitoring, trending and documentation. 1). CONCLUSIONS 1. In conclusion, for the November 18, 2010 - March 19, 2011 period, for complete data sets, the Cogeneration Plant operation is in compliance with Section 8.5 of the amended DA. Sincerely, X -nth Inc. G Michael Trzepacz, PE Principal Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian City Mitigation Measure - Cogen Plume Review November 2010 - March 2011 Period Page 2 3/25/2011 70 Date: March 22, 2011 Subject: Hoag Hospital Cogeneration Plant (Co -Gen) Mitigation Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Operations Protocol The procedure to react to weather condition that could result in a cooling tower plume will include the following steps by the programmed Energy Management Control System (EMS): 1, When the EMS records and reports conditions at the Co-Gen weather station where the Temperature (T) is less that 55 °F and Relative Humidity (RH) is greater that 55 %, the EMS determines if the time is between 7 a.m. (07:00) and 7 p.m. (19:00). 2. If the time is outside 7 and 7, then continue monitoring T and RH. 3. If the time is inside 7 and 7 then the EMS automatically calculates heat rejection load. 4. The EMS determines if the calculated heat rejection is greater than 46.2 M BTU /hr. 5. If heat rejection is less than 46.2 M BTU /hr. then the EMS continues monitoring T and RH. 6. If the calculated heat rejection is greater than 46.2 M BTU /hr., then the EMS automatically alerts the operator with audible and visual alarms for heat reduction operations. 7. The EMS automatically logs the event for auditing and reporting. 8. The EMS starts a delay timer for 15 minutes to confirm the T and RH conditions. 9. If the conditions continue then the EMS automatically alerts the operator to commence heat rejections reduction procedures. 10. The EMS automatically calculates the reduction requirements and recommends one or a combination of the following: C Secure steam chiller /absorber equipment. C Redirect Chill Water (CHW) to other equipment and /or locations. U Secure generation equipment. 11. The EMS automatically logs or trends the event and all Co -Gen equipment operations. 12. The EMS will automatically alert the operator when Co -Gen operations can return to normal. 13. At all times the EMS continues to monitor T and RH. Page 1 of 1 3/25/2011 77 Hoag Memorial Hospital Lower Campus Central Utility Plant Monitor To ess than s and RH han 55% e Y en 7 Calc Heat nd 7 Rejection 7 Heat Alert Y reject> Operator 46M Log event f211 44 H Monitor Temp K and RH Y REDUCE LOAD Reduction until event Energy Management Control System Co-Gen Plume Mitigation Flow Diagram l 72 / ewYoct�a .8 SOX. o' 4ax �4'p Y \ems Oa �t'1. 9Aa, ,Sala �q43. C94q) 049) -111 ��oSpiCd� a1es s R pow r CADve�bet,DeMa� i9� 2p10 a1 J'Feb aty, Zoll_3an w TAB 3 MITIGATION MEASURES AND PC TEXT REQUIREMENTS PA2009 -064 2011 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REVIEW r 22 Hoeg Memorial Hospital Presbyledan Master Plan Update Project M(tigetidn Monllodng and Reporling Program Hoag Hospital Project: Mitigation Measure: 3.4 -9 Upon installation of the fourth cooling tower at the cogeneration 'facility, additional noise measurements shall be performed to determine compliance with the City's Noise Ordinance. The measurements shall be made and a report submitted to the City within three months of commencement of operations of the fourth cooling tower. if a violation is noted, the problem must be corrected and a second' set of measurements submitted to the City showing compliance within one year of commencement of operations of the fourth cooling tower. Standard for Compliance: Submission of report documenting additional noise measurements and abatement of violation if necessary. Method of Verification: Documentation of report. Timing of Verification: Upon installation of the fourth cooling tower at the cogeneration facility. if a violation Is noted, the problem must be corrected and a second set of measurements submitted to the City showing compliance withih one year of commencement of operations of the fourth cooling tower. Responsible Party(les): Applicant; acoustical engineer; Planning Director or designated representative. Verification Date: City of Newport Beach Verification Approved on: Approved by: Signature: WA2007 -0 73MARKWARP-04070&0 101 es r Hoag Memorial Hosplial Presbyterian Master Plan Update Pmlect Mitigation Monitadng and Reporting. Program Hoag Hospital Project: Mitigation Measure: PDF 3.4 -1 Within six months following approval owe Master Plan Update Project by the City of Newport each and the expiration of any appeals, statute of limitations or referendum periods for challenging any of the Project approvals, the Applicant shall offer a window /sllding glass door upgrades (dual pane windows) and balcony barrier extensions to the owners of the residences (Owners) of 12 condominium units at 260 Cagney Lane, Newport Beach, in Units 202 through 207 and 302 through 307. With respect to the balcony barrier extensions, the extensions shall be 318-Inch -thick tempered glass with a frame. The top of the extensions shall extend approximately 5 to 6 feet above the balcony deck. Where windows and /or sliding glass doors would be located behind a balcony barrier, the Applicant would not be required to provide window and /or sliding glass door upgrades. Other windows /sliding glass doors of the identified condominium units would be upgraded with dual pane glass with a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 37 or better. Upgrades would be subject to the approval of the Homeowners Association and Owner. The Applicant shall be responsible for the Implementation of -the noted upgrades pursuant to the following provisions and guidelines: (1) in order to participate in the program and receive new balcony barrier extensions and/or windows /sliders, each Owner must provide written notice to the Applicant within 45 days following receipt of the proposed program from Applicant, that the Owner wants to participate in the program; (II) failure to respond within such time period shall mean the Owner desires not to participate; . (iii) the replacement balcony barrier extensions /windows /sliders shall be Installed by a thlyd -party contractor as part of one overall program pursuant to a contract between the Villa Balboa Homeowners Association (Association) and such third -party contractor selected by the Association; (Iv) the Association shall provide the Applicant with a written estimate from the contractor stating that the total cost of the replacement program and obtain Applicant's written approval of such work. prior to executing a contract with the contractor, (v) the total cost of the balcony barrier extensions and window /sllder replacement, and related patch -up work to be reimbursed by the Applicant to the Association for all Owners shall not exceed the total cost identified in a Bid Estimate approved by the City prepared by a qualified and licensed contractor plus reasonable administrative costs to manage the contract and *construction effort; and (vi) provided the Applicant receives the reimbursement request from the Association within 60 days following completion of the work,. the Applicant shall reimburse the Association for the cost of the work within 30 days of the Applicant's receipt of a final receipt, bill or Invoice from the Association evidencing that the balcony barrier extensions, and window /slider replacement work was completed pursuant to the approved estimate. Standard for Compliance: Hoag to provide copies of all documentation between Hoag and affected properly owners; installation of balcony .barrier extensions, wall insulation, and window and /or slider upgrades to participating property owners. Method of Verification: Documentation of correspondence; field inspection. Timing of Verification: Prior to issuance of building permits; installation within 6 months of approval of the Master Plan Update Project. Responsible Party(les): Applicant; Planning Director or designated representative. WA2007 -0?3%1h1RP1MMRP-040708. a 84 l Hoag lVemodal Hospital Pmsb)leden Master Plan Update PmJect Mitigation Monitodng and Reporting Program Hoag Hospital Project: Mitigation Measure: PDF 3.4 -2 Within 12 months following approval of the Master Plan Update Project by the City of Newport Beach and the expiration of any appeals, statute of limitations or referendum periods for challenging any of the Project approvals and subject to the City's Issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall have constructed a sound wall of approximately 470 linear feet along West Hoag Drive within the boundaries of the Applicant's property. The sound wall would be constructed adjacent to Hoag-Drive and set back approximately 3 to 6.5 feet from the edge of the existing curb. The sound wall shall range In height from approximately 17 to 23 feet between West Hoag Drive and the 280 Cagney Lane condominium building; and approximately 14 to 18.5 feet at the 260 Cagney Lane condominium. The location of the sound wall Is provided In Exhibit 1. The sound wall shall be constructed using the Sound Fighter° LSE Wall System (or a sound.wall system with the same sound attenuation capability and construction Implementation capability). To the maximum degree feasible, the sound wail shall be constructed to retain existing vegetation which serves as a visual screen. Vegetation that Is required to be removed associated with Installation of the sound wall shall be replaced In -kind with specimen plant material as designated on a landscape and Irrigation plan prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The plan shall be subject to review by the Villa Balboa Community Association, and review and approval by the City. The Applicant shall be responsible for the maintenance of landscaping within the property boundaries of Hoag. Any future modifications made to the sound wall and /or landscaping shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. If the removal of vegetation Is scheduled to roceed between March 1 and July, no more than seven days prior to the onset of construction activities that would Impact trees associated with the sound wall, a qualified Biologist shall conduct a pre- constructlon bird nesting survey for the trees scheduled for removal to determine the presence of any active bird nest. If an active bird nest is found, the tree cannot be removed until the nest Is deemed no longer occupied by the qualified Biologist. If no active nests are found, tree removal may commence. Trees removed anytime between August 1 and February 28 do not require any hesting bird surveys, or corresponding avoidance measures for nesting bird species. Standard for Compliance: Shown on approved building plans. Method of Verification: Plan check for grading and building permits Issued by the City. Timing of Verification: Within 12 months of the certification of the Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Master Plan Update Final Supplemental EIR (SEIR), as detailed in the above measure. Responsible Party(les): Applicant; Building Director or designated representative; Planning Director or designated representative; qualified biologist. Verification Date: wn2ao7.07M iRw.MRPOao7ae.da Fm Hoag Memodal Hospltal Presbytattan Master Plan Update Project M/ggatlon Monllodng and Reporling Program Hoag Hospital Project: Mitigation Measure: 119 Non- vehicular activities, such as the operation of the trash compactor, which occur In the vicinity of the service /access road shall be operated only between the hours of 7:00'AM and 7:00 PM daily. Standard for Compliance: Strict adherence to the operating hours; compliance documented as part of the Development Agreement annual review. Method of Verification: Documentation of compliance. Timing of Verification: Ongoing during construction and project operation, Responsible Party(les): Applicant; Planning Director or designated representative. Verification Date: City of Newoort Beach Verification Approved on: Approved by: Signature: %PA2007 -073WMRPMMRP- W708.tl0C 92 2 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Master Plan Update Project Mitigation Monlloring and Reporting Program Hoag Hospital Project: Mitigation Measure: 3.4-2 The final plans for heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment for the Ancillary Building and West Tower shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The plans shall be reviewed by an Acoustical Engineer to ensure that they will achieve 55 dBA (Leq) at the property line adjacent to the loading dock area. These plans need to be submitted within six months of the certification of the Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Master Plan Update Final Supplemental EIR (SEIR). If Hoag does not pursue the redesign of the HVAC systems for the Ancillary Building and West Tower, Hoag shall submit within six months of the certification of the Final SEIR a plan to the City that details how Hoag will bring the current equipment Into compliance with the 55 dBA nighttime noise limit when measured at the property line adjacent to the loading dock area. Standard for Compliance: Approval of final plans for heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment for the Ancillary Building and West Tower. Method of Verification: Plan check and noise'measurements. Timing of Verification: Within six months . of the certification of the Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Master Plan Update Final Supplemental EIR (SEIR), as detailed In the above measure. Responsible Party(fes): Applicant; Planning Director or designated representative. Verification Date: Citv.of Newoort' ®each Verification Approved on: Approved by: Signature: wr2ro7 -073WMRPM1AnPL1070e0. 94 27 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyleden Master Plan Update ProJeG M/Ugatlon Monitoring and Reporting Program Hoag Hospital Project: Mitigation Measure: 3.4 -3 Prior to issuance of building permits for any project that includes HVAC equipment, an acoustical study of the noise generated by the HVAC equipment shall be performed and a report that documents the results shall be submitted. This report shall present the noise levels generated by the equipment and the methodology, used to estimate the noise levels at nearby residential uses or property boundary, as applicable; the report will also demonstrate that combined noise levels generated by all new HVAC equipment does not exceed applicable regulations. This study shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of building permits. After installation of the equipment, noise measurements shall be performed and provided to the City that demonstrates compliance with applicable noise level limits. Standard for Compliance: Approval of applicable acoustical study, provision of noise measurements to the City after installation. Method of Verification: Approved applicable acoustics I- study. Timing of Verification: Prior to issuance of building permits for any project that includes HVAC equipment, measurements after installation of applicable equipment. Responsible Party(ies): Applicant; Planning Director or designated representative. Verification Date: City of Nowvort Beach Verification Approved on: Approved by: Signature: WA2007- 073VAMRM4ARP4407064K 65 gg Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyledan Master plan Update Protect Mitigation Mongortng and Reporting Program Hoag Hospital Project: Mitigation Measure: 3.4-4 Truck deliveries to the loading dock.area are restricted to the hours of 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. It is noted that special'situations may arise that reclulre delivery outside of these hours. Standard for Compliance: Strict adherence to the operating hours; compliance documented as part of the Development Agreement annual review. Method of Verification: Documentation of compliance. Timing of Verification: Ongoing during project operation, Responsible Party(tes): Applicant; Planning Director or designated representative. Verification Date: City of Newport Beach Verification Approved on: Approved by: Signature: IPA2007-0?3WMAMMRP- W?00.dM 96 Q Hoeg Memorial 'Hospllel Presbyledan Master Plan Update Pro /oct Mittgallon Monflodng and Reporting Program Hoag Hospital Project: Mitigation Measure: 3.4-5. Sound absorption panels on the east wall of the loading dock shall be Installed. Approximately 450 square feet of absorptive panels shall be used to cover major portions of the back wall of the loading dock area. The Noise -Foil panels by Industrial Acoustics or a panel with an equivalent or better sound rating shell be used. Standard for Compliance: Installation of sound absorption panels. Method of Verification: Field Inspection and noise measurements. Timing of Verification: Installation within 6 months of approval of the Master Plan Update Project. Responsible Party(les): Applicant; acoustical engineer; Planning Director or designated representative. Verification Date: City of Newport Beach Verification Approved on: Approved by: Signature: 1PA2007.073W)ARPMARP.040708:Eoc 97 go Hoag Memorfal Hospital Presbylerian Master Plan Update Roject Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Hoag Hospital Project: Mitigation Measure: 3.4 -6 The trash compactor. shall be relocated within the loading dock. The trash compactor and baler shall be enclosed in a three -sided structure. The walls shall be concrete block or similar masonry construction. The roof shall be lightweight concrete roof or a plywood surface with concrete tiles; a built -up roof with 5' 5" pf insulation on the Inside would be an acceptable alternative. The open side shall face away from the residents. Doors may be on the side of the enclosure facing the residents, but must be closed when the baler or compactor are operating. The compactor and baler should only be operated between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM. Standard for Compliance: Shown on approved applicable plans. Method of Verification: Plan check and ongoing. Timing of Verification: Within 6 months of the approval of the Master Plan Update Project. Responsible Partyties): Applicant; Planning Director or designated representative. Verification Date: City of Newport Beach Verification Approved on: Approved by: Signature: WA 007.0)9lMMRRMMRP.elo7aa.60C se 91 Hoag Memorial Hospital Pfesbyladen Master Plan Update Pmfect Millgalion Monlloring and Reporting Pmgrem Hoag Hospital Project: Mitigation Measure: 3.4 -7 "No Idling" signs shall be posted In the loading dock area and any area where the trucks might queue. Standard for Compliance: Method of Verification: Timing of Verification: Responsible Party(les): Verification Date: Installation and maintenance of signs. Field Inspection. Within one month of the approval of the Master Plan Update Project. Applicant; Planning Director or designated representative. City of Newport Beach Verification Approved on: Approved by: Signature: 1Pn2007-073WMRPJ.eMP-040709.dW 09 92 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbytedon Master Plan Update Pmfoat MiUgatlon Monflodng and Reporting Program Hoag Hospital Project: Mitigation Measure: 3.4 -8 Grease trap cleaning operations shall be limited to Saturday between the hours of 11:00 AM and 3:00 PM. Standard for Compliance: Strict adherence to the operating hours; compliance documented as part of the Development Agreement annual review. Method of Verification: Documentation of compliance. Timing of Verification: Ongoing. Responsible Parry(les): Applicant; Planning Director or designated representative. Verification Date: City of Newport Beach Verification Approved on: Approved by: Signature: %PA2007-0"WARAMMdnP-0070B.doc 100 3 94 EM131 r 1( ,i 4n &2006 95 Government/Agency Anticipated Location Area Description Landscape Element Schedule Status Outcome/ Effect Add 5, 48' box evergreen screen trees and new Nov 2007Installed Protect Screentso9en completed views of west Additional tree planting irrigation end of Co Gen Building Area 1 -Co Gen per community request From PCH Add 3, 48' box evergreen screen trees and am To Install commence May 2008. Completion July Coastal Comm. Approved 2108 Addetl screening of Co Gen Additional tree planting inigallon 2008 Flare Area 2 -Co Gen per community request Attach metal green scream tatuce structure Ure to Install commence May 2008. completion July Coastal Comm. Approved 2/08 enfsogen specific Mows of Add green screen cover east building elevation 2008. Cc Co Gen Building Area 3 -Ca Gen alUce per community request To commence May 2008. enlsogen apccific views of Plant hewn ring vines to cove green screen k" completion July Coastal Comm. Approved 2(08 Co Co Gen Building CL 2008. E Additional lean up and regrado shrubs, groundcover and maw Added visual alit and Y ` irrigation system added upon completion of wall Nov 2007 Installed Project completed erosion control a Area 4 -Ce Gan Slope area with added shrub Prok� Behind Trailers nd groundcover -- - - -- planking to m O S 24 trees, shrubs and groundcover Plantings and Nw 2007Inala0ed Project Completed Added campus visual quality Tree shrub and newwater conserving Irrigation system screening and erosion control Area 5 • Co Gen Slope groundcouerplanting Installed as pan of lower Campus Wag Project Area Wag 6 - Retaining Trees base al West and shrub 8, 24' bee evergreen screen Veen Nw 2007Insla0ad Prated completed Iretaining Screen and semen views of wag Parking planking lot Installed as part of Lower Campus Wall Project 12, 36'box sowerihgtrees and 4 fan palm Now N 2007 Installed Project completed Seem views ofopen parking let trees and irrigation system at end Islands areas Area 7 - West Parking tae planking as Part of lower Campus Wag Project increased shade and visual Area Islands Installed enhancement to parking area nstallathm shall commence no later Soften views of open parldng lot Area 7a - West pastas Tree planking J6 "bole ftbwerirlg bees and 3 fan no Eater than Dec than 60 days of COP issuance by areas and Increase shade and Parking Area Islands palm bees a 2009ged 2009 the Coastal Comm visual enhancement to parking areas. Area 8 - Top Of Flowering bougainvillea 550, bougainvillea smubs, installed as pad of Nov 2007 installed Project completed Colorful edge deinifim and witening of views along top of Retaining Wall shrub planting Lower Campus Wall Project retaining wag Area 9 -North Sid Regmde area add groundcover, fencing and new migallon Installed no later than Dec Installation Small commence no later Enhanced overall campus �y above Retaining Wall once shrub and system 2008 than 120 days of CDP Issuance by visual quality, safety and O roundcpverplanking the Coastal Comm erosion central J 1T � Added Visual Quality, Parking = Area 10 - New Child Additional trees shrubs 17 trees, shrubs and groundcover and new Dec 2007 Installed Project completed area screening and bulaing Care Facility grounaewer panting irrigation system drop om and entry area definition Area 11 -Lower Camlis,U611t Replace trees, shrub and roundcover and Trees, shrub 8 groundcovers and new Irrigation Installation schedule Dec. Pending City approval In concept Improve K unify campus PCH P Y Upgrade Project 9 enhance planking areas system 2009 and Coastal Comm Approval planting character along ironlage aver uulkies installed j Immediately upon Issuance of an CL } Approval in Concept (AIC) by the City of Newport Beach an O appUealion shall be submitted for m Area 12 - PCH Green Additional green wean Install approx. 870 Unear feet of green screen Installed no tutor than Dec said improvements to the Coastal Scroen views otwest paridng Screen and treelshmb plan ding along PCH fromaga 2009 Comm. La Iran PCH O Construction of said improvements --r shag be completed no later than 10 mauhs after CDP Issuance by the = Coastal Comm. Area 13 - Future Temporary vague rid Coastal wOd Rower and grass Mydroseetl ErosioNduU control and Parking Lot at base of hydroseed planting until permanent parking lot with Hydroseed and litigation Hydroseed and emlgafion completetl enha:f visual quality Wall Behind ATP groundcover Planking landscape improvements added. Instilled Dec 2007 pen�krgo lure parking area Bldg Color Code Indicating Current Project Status Green Indicates current improvements that have been Installed per previous approvals Yellow Indicates improvements Installed but not spark of required permits Orange Indicates improvements in design phase yet to -- - -- -- — —�— be submitted far city or agency, approvals Indicates Improvements proposed but not Aqua approved for installation o Lid. TA StfB Revised 4115108 for City Council Medkra EM131 r 1( ,i 4n &2006 95 m WEST HOAG DRIVE SOUND WALL PA2009 -064 2011 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REVIEW 92 Mitigation Measure PDF 3.4 -2 —471 linear feet Sound Wall at West Hoag Drive Q City of Newport Beach - Building Department Inspoction Card 3360 Newpod Blvd Inspection RequestsTelephono (949) 644 -3255 Vide : 09.09 -2669 b..uding Permit H : X2009.ODOG Plan Check 11 : 0054.2009 Job Address: 1 (SW) HOAG DR NB BLDG / ELEC Owner: HOAG HOSPITAL FD &C GRAD / Contractor: DEB CONSTRUCTION INC IvL114111 P MB 2360 _ _ Mason •Gr r Pra an _ _ _ _ _ -• _ ___ _ _ __ B 2370 Slab on Dock Slower Lath IMO 2580 -- Fxlorior Lolh -- r8 2303 Gas Pipe Piashu- Scratch __ LOMB 2400— - HV—A—C - -'- - -- -....-- -- - -- - - - --- -- - - - -- - _ 2410 Hood- -------- ,OMB _ -- 2420 _ - - -- Firoplaco Throat_ _Gas Graeh9 /Rralna�jn i 2425 Other Mechanical PlannirlDOpL 9491614 3200 OAiB __ _ _ 2470_ _ UnderrFkoi P1um6inq-- __ -_ _ -__ - ._ _ -_ ._._ - __.__ -- •___ OMB 2440 Undet FWor Elecldeal _ __Itlas Publlo WOrks 9491644 3311 OMB -_- _ 7456_ Rough Eleclde Residential_____ - - - - - - -- - -_- - - -- - - OMB -_ - _ 2480 - -- RougA Conduit Walls - - - - - -- •�.:�;_i 1 �� ;r.. l_.•_0 {I�_ OMD - 9170 Widn(� Ce6lnys ti . I •t.: 1 A _ OMD NKO 2400 _Rauph _ Rough Eloclrical SeMco FIOOr F(aminp 8 Shealhnr) _ _ _ - _ _ _ . 1 OMB 2500 Rough Wall Framin9 1OMB Ord6 2510 Rollgh F(aminq ShcaI1) elF Ilkiddinrl HI OMB 2520 ComjIete Framing_ COMB _- 2530 Other Elnciiii t..N V. _ n T- r • 7. \�1 •• NOT COVFR • ABOVE N Fr( �x lMe IMU )MB -- - 2540 2550 _. Insulation p _ ti.— Su!pended Ceiling _2560 INS -_- -_ 2676 Slower Lath IMO 2580 -- Fxlorior Lolh IMB ___ _- 2590 Piashu- Scratch IMB _ _ 2600 Other Suildlr�_ _ _ _ _ _ 1'rossure Test _ IMB 2617 - _Gas Graeh9 /Rralna�jn i _ iA16 3080 PlannirlDOpL 9491614 3200 AS _ _ 7081 IlWW_. 9491134C3011 0 3002 _ __Itlas Publlo WOrks 9491644 3311 3003 SeMcos 9491644_3055 -N FMB 1.3884 _ _General Fire Dept: 9491644.9105 - -- -- '--'- - -- �NB - - -2R20 _ ti . I •t.: 1 A .. �.r. FINAL E•w 1 r n' 44 v TO REOUEST 1NSPEC110NS call the Inspection mrluesl Uric (n) 9491644.32559 m visit the CITY woh silp. Fl rl Ipalwww.ullY•nowpor 1•heacl Lca.uti Select Online Services PLEASE HAVE YOU14 PERM) I NUMBER FOR THE TYPE Or INSPECTION (PLUMBING. MECHANICAL. ELECTRICAL ETC.)READVTOENTER 1110) FOLLOW THE PROMPTS. INSPECT ION REQUESTS MADE PRIOR TO 5:00 A IA FOR APPROVED STATUS PERMITS WILL BE MADE THAT DAY PERMITS ISSUFD I.ATE IN THE DAY MAY NOT BE PROCESSED IN TIME FOR NEXT DAY INSPECTION Inspoelm Notes am loral4vl en the rever;,e side. 100 City of Newpoll Beach : Building Pernit Inspection Request Page I of I l' BUILDING PERMIT IT gNSP EtC` ION REQUEST Permit Number 112009'0119 status FINAL Entered Dale 11/5/2009 Applied Dale 111912009 Appltwed 1114 /2009 Final Dale 413012010 Description INSTALLATION OF A SDUNDWALL OVER EXISTING UTILITIES (WATER UNIE, STORK MIN, CATCH BASIN,14ANROLE), Address I HOAG DR Inspector Maus PU05s1949694 -3331 Inspection HHIory Da1C Stem Description Action Entered by 0413012010 10250 FILIAL • Py/ Fna1 WI 5.41,1 1111, Pmmn I SvOmp lmPr<IYm I FutAtaua lnrP[U[n I Cemtl lnlGt[I <n httl):/ hvww. newportbeachca .gov /index.aspx7page =669 5/6/2010 101 -01.�rT'n�r City of Newport Beach - Building Department `i.' ?`'; Inspection Card r ,, i l 3300 Newport Blvd. ,,, Inspection RequoslsTelophono (949) 644 -3255 '�_rfa• 'r'Ilq IY }� +� Date: 01-19-2010 Building Permit ti: X2009.1036 Plan Check I/: 0819.2009 Job Address: 1 HOAG DR NS BLDG /GRAD Owner: HOAG HOSPITAL FD R C / Contractor : DEB CONSTRUCTION INC Description: INSTL WALL 25 LF X 1117" MAX HI (o) LOWER CAMPUS -.• ,,. ,i- 'l4l' ?.','n,t!fg'7 ;1''7.. ,DATE SIGNATUR_E___ TYPE ITEMd DESCRIPTION 1�OMO 2200 Pregrade Meeting___ OMB 2560 iCOMB 2210 Soil Pipe _ ' 2570 OMB 2220 Sewer OAIS - - -_ -- OMB 2230 '• Water Pipe OMB OMB 2240 _ Gas Pipe Fire ace Throat _ OMB 2260 Underslab/Floor Mechanical ______ OtherMechenFc l OMB OMB 2280 Ufar Ground Under Floor Plumbl _ OMB _._ OMB 2270 Undor round Electrical Under Floor EleGdcal OMB •OMB 2280 Rou hGuideApproval ___ • ____ OMB 2290 WO.9oslWanagemanlPracBce6•� - - -- Rough Conduit Walls —' - -__ MB 230D Erection Pads Rough Wiring CenmgB _ OMB OMB 2310 Foundation Setbacks Rou h Electrical Service _ OMB_ . _ _OMB _ 2320 Footle s /Foundalions -_ .'� .• %R 5, 79-0—zml. MB 2330 Slab on Grade rk "...�.. OMB 2340 Area Drains r�• OMB 2350 Other Plumbi n 2530 •Q .I Other Elecglcel i' Mr. • ^:' .r :• :. .r i"f r, (4r i .+ 'ti. . r Fr3.J�rl t %;t' ROUGH OMB 2360 Masonry Pro-Grout Slab on Deck OMB 2370 9 2380 Plumbingv OMB 2560 B 2390 Gas P11Le _ ' 2570 B2400 HVAC OAIS 12580 _ _ •• 2410 Hood OMB 2590 Plasler•Scialch 2420 Fire ace Throat _ OMB 7800 _ B 2425 ______ OtherMechenFc l OMB 2610 B 2430 Under Floor Plumbl _ OMB _._ Lo_17_ B 1000—MMMB 2440 Under Floor EleGdcal OMB 7000 B 2450 Rou h Electric Residential OM13 .,`. 9001 B 2460 Rough Conduit Walls OMB ' B 2470 Rough Wiring CenmgB _ OMB _3002 _ :W General Services 94916,14-3055 2480 Rou h Electrical Service _ OMB_ . _ 8004 7_ B Floor Framing 8 Sheathin OMB �7920 1'71 B _2490 2600 Rough Well Framing rk "...�.. B 2510 Rou h Framin ShealhlnD L Building HI r�• 2620 Complete Framng :OMB tR�b 1 I • 'I Vd 2530 •Q .I Other Elecglcel r . • • • • r . a •• ', . " r .r:'t d' Sir :��?Jl.'T"o4 k:- 'rfl,. =' 3i• A EXTERIOR .OMB 2540 Insulation _ OMB 2550 2awil OMB 2560 Suspended Calll� OMB ' 2570 Shower lath OAIS 12580 —• Exterior Lalh OMB 2590 Plasler•Scialch _ OMB 7800 _ Other Building OMB 2610 Gas PressurTest _ OMB _._ Lo_17_ Grading Drainage OMB 7000 Plann3n Dept. 9491644.3200 OM13 .,`. 9001 Utilities Deal. 9491644-3011 OMB ' Public Works 9401644.3311 _ OMB _3002 _ :W General Services 94916,14-3055 _ OMB_ . _ 8004 7_ _ Fire Deal: 9491644.3105 OMB �7920 1'71 "irw.l FINAL 10 .`. rk "...�.. )ii.i;rr'rrY',r'ti 1 r�• TO REQUEST INSPECTIONS call the Inspoction request lineal 9491844.3255 or visit Ilse City website at h1lp:f 1www.newp0rlbonchcs.0ov and select Online Services Inspections (only lot permits In opp(ovdd slolus) must be requested borore 6:00 A.M. Ilia day of Ilia Inspection. Please use Ilia following list of permit code when calling for an Inspection: PRESS: '0' for combination / X permit 'I' for building / B permit '2' for plumbing r P permit '3' far electircal / E permit '4' for mechanical / H permit '5' for grading f G permit 16' for harbor / M permit '2' for pool and spa 18 pormll '8' for fire / F permit Inspector Notes are located on lho reverse side. 102 TAB 5 LOADING DOCK SOUND ABSORPTION PANELS (CITY AND OSPOD FINAL PERMIT) PA2009 -064 2011 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REVIEW 1 /�\ `� 1-04 l Mitigation Measure 3.4 -5 — Loading Dock Sound Absorption Panels CI 105 = %'r City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd, Newport Beach, Job Address : 1 HOAG DR NB Public Works Department Permit No: N2009 -0319 CA 92663 Public Works S Inspection Requests (949) 6443311 Utilities Inspection Requests (949) 6443011 rhomas:Guide: 800G4 Description : INSTALLATION OF A SOUNDWALL OVER EXISTING UTILITIES (WATER Sewer Connection : LINE. STORM DRAIN, CATCH BASIN. MANHOLE). Agreement Fee: Parcel 0: 4TT Box Cover: $0.00 Legal Desc : IRVINE SUB BLK 2 LOTS 169 & 170 POR OF LOTS & BILK 1 172 POR Total Water Meters: OF LOT Inspection Fee: S1,100.00 Owner: HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL Contractor: DEB CONSTRUCTION INC Phone: 0 Phone: 714- 632 -6680 Address: 301 N NEWPORT BLVD Address : 2230 E WINSTON ROAD $0.00 ORANGE CA 92869 ANAHEIM CA 92806 Contractor State Lic: 372419 Applicant: DEB CONSTRUCTION INC License Expire: 0331, 2011 Phone: 714.632 -6680 [ Address : 2230 E W INSTON ROAD ANAHEIM CA 92806 Business License: ST30028854 Business Expire: 08.31, 2010 Special Cond.: STORM DRAIN LINER SHALL BE UNDER Workers' Compensation Insurance -- SEPARATE EP WITH A LICENSE CONTRACTOR Carrier: TRAVELERS IDEMNITY AGMT PREPARED BY CITY ATTY. Policy No: DTEUS9072CI I09 W. C. Expire: 01 01.2010 Permit Processing Fee: $290.00 Sewer Connection : $0.00 Agreement Fee: $0.00 4TT Box Cover: $0.00 Traffic control Plan Check: $0.00 Total Water Meters: $0.00 Inspection Fee: S1,100.00 Water Meter Connection: $0.00 Refundable Deposit. $0.00 Total Water Meter Box: $0.00 Street Tree Fee : $0.00 Adjustment: $0.00 Processed By: Date: _ /_1 Utilities Approval: Date : _ /_ /, Traffic Approval : Date : --L _l General Services Approval: Date: —1-1. Total Fee Paid: Balance: Receipt No: Other Department: Permit Denied : S1,390.00 S1.390.00 $0.00 —I —/— _I_1 Issued Permit: Date : _1_I_ 100 Y;t�t City of Newport Beach Building`Department COMB Permit No: 3200"`9/// -0060 r.' PO Box 1768 Newport Beach, California 92658$915 Permit Counter Telephone (949)644 -3288 Inspection RequestsfTelephone (949)644 -3255 Combination Type - BLD& ELEC/ GRAD / Job Address: 1 (SW) HOAG DR NB Description: INSTIL SOUNDWALL 23' HI (MAX) x 500' LF Project : 00542009 0054- 2009/W EST RD @ LOAD DOCK Inspector Area: 7 Legal Desc.: Owner. HOAG HOSPITAL FDBC Address: 500 SUPERIOR AVE #300 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663 Phone: 949- 764-4486 Applicant HAZARD MATT Address: 833 DOVER OR #9 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663 Phone: 949.548 -3459 Code Edit: 2007 Type of Construction: Occupancy Group: U Added /New sq.fL Bldg: Added /Newsq. fL Garage: No of Stories: 0 No of Units: 0 Bldg Height: 0 Bldg Sprinklers: Flood Zone: Contractor. DEB CONSTRUCTION INC Address: 2230 E WINSTON ROAD 0 Expire: ANAHEIM CA 928G6 Phone: 714. 632.6680 Con State Lic: 372419 Lic Expire: 03131=11 Bus Up: 6730028854 Lic Exp Date: 08!312010 Worker's Compensation Insurance Cartier. TRAVELERS IDEMNI Y Policy No: OTEUB9072C1109 0 Expire: 01/01/2010 0 $0.00 Building Setbacks Rear: / Disabled Access : Front / Fee Increase: Fee: Left / Additional Fee: Right I Use Zone: 50.00 Construction Valuation: 31.043.091.00 Building Permit Fee: $5.561.40 Plan Check Fee: 54,05421 Overtime Plan Ck: S0.00 Investigation Fee: $0.00 Record Management: $341.00 Energy Compliance: $0.00 CA Seismic Safety: $0.00 Disabled Access : 50.00 Fee Increase: Fee: $0.00 Additional Fee: $0.00 Hazardous Mat: 50.00 Building Green Fee : $42.00 TOTAL FEE: $13,294.08 PROCESSED BY: ZONING APPROVAL: GRADING APPROVAL: Z ( - l Z5 0,-))P San Dist: $0.00 Excise Tax. $0.00 NMUSD Fee: $0.00 Grading Permit Fee: $750.00 Grading PC Fee: $540.00 WQ Insp. Fee: $0.00 ElecL-ical %: S486.63 Mechanical %: $0.00 Plumbing %: $0.00 FEES ArUitect HERMAN DANIEL Address: 833 DOVER DR #9 Phone: Special Conditions: Planning Department - Plan check Fee: $238.00 Fair Share : S0.00 SJH Trans: S0.00 Public Works Department - Park Dedication: $0.00. P/W Plan Check : $480.00 Plan Check Fee : $5,539.70 Fire Department Fire Inspection: NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663 Phone: 949 - 548 -3459 State Uc:0002985 Engineer. HALLADAY DANA STANLEY Address: 1181 CALIFORNIAAVE#102 General Service CORONA CA 92881 Phone: 951- 278 -9700 State UaC -034751 Designer: Address: Phone: Special Conditions: Planning Department - Plan check Fee: $238.00 Fair Share : S0.00 SJH Trans: S0.00 Public Works Department - Park Dedication: $0.00. P/W Plan Check : $480.00 Plan Check Fee : $5,539.70 Fire Department Fire Inspection: $0.00 Fire Plan Rev $800.84 Demolition Fee Building Dept Adm $0.00 General Service $0.00 Refund Deposit $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fee Due at Permit Issuance : $7,754.38 PUBLIC WORVA AP §k;)VALZ O° 0 PLANCHECK^SY' APPROVAL TO ISSUE: PERMITS EXPIRE 180 DAYS AFTER ISSUANCE OR LAST VAL1Dolpl$PErTI019. 0 0 0 ° �O� rrr. office of Statewide Health Planning and Development facilities Development Division 700 N. Alameda Street, Suite 2 -500 Los Angeles, CA 90012 12131897.0166 fox (2131897-0168 NwAY-oshPd.co.9ov/fdd 8/31/2010 Mr Jack F. Wood C15130 SL101454 -30 Wood Burghard & Swain Architects 4850 Barranca Parkway, Suite 203 Irvine, CA 92604 Facility: Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian -10428 One Hoag Drive Newport Beach, CA 92663 Project Title: LOADING SOUND PANEL INSTALLATION Dear Mr Jack F. Wood: The Building Permit for this project and the approved Application for Inspector of Record is enclosed. Please post the Building Permit at the project site and maintain a complete set of the stamped, approved construction documents at all times. Notify this office In writing of the start date prior to commencing construction and Include the name and address of the contractor, contract price and the date on which the contract was let. This Building Permit expires unless construction has been started by 8/3112011. All correspondence submitted to this office must be identified by the OSHPO project number: SL101454 -30 Verified Compliance Reports must be submitted to the office in accordance with CCR, Title 24, Part 1, Chapter 7, Section 7 -151. If there are any questions, please contact me at (213) 897.4151. Sincerely, Toni Crowder Regional Compllance Officer cc: L & C Facility Representative Project File IOR/A20352 TO ACO /LSD it State of California - Health and Human Services Agency OP— PlanAP TIOAP v20060913 Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor 102 Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development Facilities Development Division 700N. Alomedo Street, Suite 2 -500 .os Angeles, CA 90012 1213)897.0166 fox (2131897.0168 wv^v.oslipd.ca.gov/fdd 10/18/2010 Mr Jack F. Wood Wood Burghard & Swain Architects SL101454.30 4650 Barranca Parkway, Suite 203 Irvine, CA 92604 Facility: Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian -10428 Facility Address: One Hoag Drive Newport Beach, CA 9 2663 Project Title: LOADING SOUND PANEL INSTALLATION Dear Mr Jack F. Wood: This Office has been notified that construction on the above - referenced project is complete. However, prior to acceptance by the Department of Health Services, Licensing and Certification Division, the completed construction must be approved and accepted by the Facilities Development Division of the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development. Please submit the required information no later than 12/17/2010 Final Verified Reports: Missing reports are indicated by a "?" Not required reports are indicated by "NIA" Reports received are indicated with a dale. :ontractor /Owner: ? Inspector of Record: ? 372419 A20352 Davis Architect: ? Mechanical Engineer: NIA C15130 Wood Structural Engineer: ? Electrical Engineer: N/A S4614 Welton Geotechnical Engineer: N/A Civil Engineer: N/A Final Verified Costs: Complete, sign, and return this form. I HEREBY CERTIFY THESE COSTS/VALUES TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE UNDER PENALTIES OF PERJURY. THESE COSTSfVALUES ARE SUBJECT TO AUDIT. Final Construction Value Radiological Equipment Value Certified By: Dale: Print Name: Phone: If there are any questions, please contact me at (213) 897 -0174. Sincerely, ��ry�� 'iyntrnM11- r'nez Cynthia Martinez •c: Project File Program Technician II IOR -rf) Administrator, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian -10428 Request Nei 10 v051108 101Fi of California - Health and Human Services Agency Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor I q_9 OFFICE OF STATEWIDE HEALTH PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 14 FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT DIVISION 700 N. ALAMEDA ST. SUITE 2 -500 LOS ANGELES, CA. 90012 Tel: (213)897 -01.06 fax: (213) 897 -0168 CONSTRUCTION ADVISORY — CONSTRUCTION FINAL 0 II Title or Scope of.ProJect: ; Loading Dock Sound Panel Installation CONSTRUCTION FINAL — The work has been comoleted and appears to substantiallv conform to the aooroved Dial and applicable California Building Standards Code. Project closure requires that Final Verified Reports be milled and the Final Construction Costs be certified to the Office in accordance with Section 7 -155, Article 4, 1..apter 7, Pad 1, Title 24, CCR. All submittals shall be sent to the Office indicated above. Failure to do so may result in a project closure status of "non- compliance." Any subsequent construction changes to an area, portion or project that has been issued a construction final must be done through a new permitted project, and not as a change order. Umh Onsite visit with IOR to review construction documents and project status. All work completed per approved plans. No DSE or FLSO approvals required. Verified reports and T.I.O. reviewed and T.I.O. cleared. 1, ;PD FDD Field Staff: LLOYD DICK - ACO .( Date: 9/28/2010 Report Received By/Title: TODD DAVIS - IOf�--�T Date: 9/28/2010 OSHPD- Consiruelion Final (00100199) 1-10 mum TRASH COMPACTOR MITIGATION PA2009 -064 2011 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REVIEW 112 0 r ® ®r we Mitigation Measure 3.4 -6 — Trash Compactor Enclosure with Sound Absorption Panels (Trout View) Mitigatiou Measure 3.4 -6 —Trash Compactor Euclosure with Sound Absorption Panels (Back View) t 113 Mitigation Measure 3.4 -6— Baler Enclosure with Sound Absorption Panels 11.4- ble Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development Facilities Development Division 700 N. Alameda Street, Sulle 2 -500 :os Angeles, CA 90012 (213) 897.0166 Fox (2131897.0168 www.oshpd.co.gov/fdd 1/12/2011 Mr Jack F. Wood C15130 SLI10046 -30 Wood Burghard & Swain Architects 4650 Barranca Parkway, Suite 203 Irvine, CA 92604 Facility: Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian-10428 One Hoag Drive Newport Beach, CA 92663 Project Title: LOADING DOCK IMPROVEMENT Dear Mr Jack F. Wood: rot The Building Permit for this project and the approved Application for Inspector of Record Is enclosed. Please post the Building Permit at the project site and maintain a complete set of the stamped, approved construction documents at all times. Notify this office In writing of the start date prior to commencing construction and include the name and address of the ,ontractor, contract pace and the date on which the contract was let. This Building Permit expires unless construction has been started by 1/1212012. All correspondence submitted to this office must be identified by the OSHPD project number: SL110046 -30 Verified Compliance Reports must be submitted to the office in accordance with CCR, Title 24, Part 1, Chapter 7, Section 7 -151. If there are any questions, please contact me at (213) 897 -4151. Sincerely, y, Tom Crowder Regional Compliance Officer cc: L & C Facility Representative Project File IOR/A20352 ACOILSD State of California — Health and Human Services Agency BP Plan* TIOAPv20080913 Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor 1 15 110 Dom LOWER CAMPUS SLOPE AND PCH SCREEN LANDSCAPE PHASE PLAN =I. 2011 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REVIEW /.l / 112 PC — Landscaping Lower Campus Area 7a — West Parldug Area Islands PC — Landscaping Lower Campus Area 7a — West Parking Area Islands from the Top View 129 PC — Landscapiug Lower Campus Area 7a — West Parking Area Islands — Palm Trees Corridor 120 PT PC — Landscaping Lower Campus Area 9 — North Slope above Retaining Wall — View from Cogeneration Cul De Sac S� 121 r. P r: Jp f PC — Landscaping Lower Campus Area 12 PCH Green Screen — New landscaping along Pacific Coast Highway 122