Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10 - Draft EIR for Pacific City Project, Pacific Coast Highway, Huntington BeachCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No. 10 November 25, 2003 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: City Manager's Office Sharon Wood, Assistant City Manager 644 -3222, swood @city.newport- beach.ca.us SUBJECT: Draft EIR for Pacific City Project, Pacific Coast Highway, Huntington Beach ISSUE: Should the City of Newport Beach send comments on the Draft EIR to the City of Huntington Beach? RECOMMENDATION: Approve and authorize the Mayor to send the comments in the attached letter DISCUSSION: The City of Huntington Beach issued a Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the Pacific City Project on October 17, 2003. The Pacific City Project consists of the development of 31.5 acres of vacant land in the downtown area of Huntington Beach. The site is located east of First Street, west of Huntington Street, south of Atlanta Avenue, and north of Pacific Coast Highway. The project includes a neighborhood commercial center adjacent to Pacific Coast Highway with up to 400 hotel rooms, up to 240,000 square feet of retail, office, restaurant, cultural and entertainment uses with 1,543 subterranean parking spaces; a residential village with 516 condominiums, 1,360 parking spaces and private and public open space; and public improvements including a pedestrian overpass across Pacific Coast Highway. Staff determined that this project could have impacts on the City of Newport Beach, and referred the document to the Environmental Quality Affairs Committee (EQAC) for review. EQAC prepared comments, and approved them at their meeting of November 17. In addition, the Transportation and Development Services Manager reviewed the traffic section of the DEIR and prepared comments. All of these comments are incorporated in the attached letter. Submitted by Sharon Wood Assistant City Manager Attachment: Comment letter CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayor Steven Bromberg November 26, 2003 Mayor Pro Tem Tod W Ridgeway Council Members Garold B. Adams Ms. Mary Beth Broeren John Heffernan Planning Department Richard A. Nichols 2000 Main Street Steven Rosansky Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Don Webb Dear Ms. Broeren: Pacific City Proiect Draft Environmental Impact Report Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Pacific City Project Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR). The City of Newport Beach did not receive or provide comments on the ISINOP, but has reviewed the summary of comments provided as an appendix to the Draft EIR as part of our review of this document. Air Quality Section 3.2.2 — Regulatory Framework. The existing localized carbon monoxide concentrations shown on Table 3.2 -5 exceed the future (2010) with project localized carbon monoxide concentrations shown on Table 3.2 -7. This outcome is counterintuitive. An explanation of why air quality improves in the future with the project should be provided. Section 3.2.4 — Project Impacts, indicates the current and projected population and employment for Orange County. These figures are incorrect and should be updated. Section 3.2.6 — Mitigation Measures and Residual Impacts. The mitigation measures as currently written are too vague and uncertain, and will not necessarily result in reductions in air quality impact. Comments on specific mitigation measures are presented below: CR AQ -E — An explanation of the type of wind barrier that will be implemented should be provided. City Hall • 3300 Newport Boulevard • Post Office Box 1768 Newport Beach, California 92658 -8915 • www.city.newport- beach.ca.us (949) 644 -3004 Page 2 Pacific City Project Draft Environmental Impact Report November 26, 2003 CR AQ- F- An explanation of what is meant by a remedial operation and how it will reduce fugitive dust should be provided. MM AQ —1 through AQ -6 rely on contract specifications as an implementation method. The developer and the contractor have a financial incentive not to comply with these mitigation measures. A description of the City's inspection program and how it will function to ensure mitigation measures are carried through should be provided. MM AQ -4 — The contractor should be required to rely on electric utilities, and not be given the option of using electric utilities to the extent feasible. MM AQ -6 — It is suggested that performance standards be required to ensure that energy efficient appliances are installed. Hydrology and Water Quality Table 3.8 -4, Policies Applicable to Hydrology and Water Quality. Policy 6.1.25 states that new development will minimize the creation of impervious areas. We suggest that the developer strongly consider using porous pavement and swales wherever possible, especially in the street and parking areas, to help divert run -off water back into the earth. Transportation and Traffic The City of Newport Beach is concerned about the size of the project relative to the area covered by the traffic study. The draft EIR traffic study includes Pacific Coast Highway only as far as the Brookhurst intersection within the City of Huntington Beach. The scope of the study should be extended along Pacific Coast Highway up to the intersection with Dover Drive. This will cover several major arterial intersections, such as PCH /Superior and PCH /Newport Boulevard that would potentially be impacted by a project of this size. The Project Trip Distribution diagrams indicate that almost 25% of the project traffic is anticipated to use P acific Coast Highway in Newport Beach. T he impacts of this additional traffic, some 3000 daily trips, must be analyzed in detail. In addition to extending the geographical scope of the traffic study, the key intersection analysis, as described on page 3.14 -52, should include scenario 4 (without the 19th Street Bridge over the Santa Ana River). The completion of this link is not a certainty, and our Page 3 Pacific City Project Draft Environmental Impact Report November 26, 2003 understanding is that the City of Huntington Beach has agreed to analyze projects with and without the 19th Street Bridge. The Congestion Management Program (CMP) analysis is incomplete and further substantiates the need to extend the boundary of the study. The CMP, as adopted in Orange County, requires the analysis to extend to the point that project traffic falls below 3% of the roadway's LOS E capacity. In the case of West Coast Highway in Newport Beach, this threshold is 1689 daily trips and the traffic study indicates the project volume is around 3000 daily trips, well in excess of the threshold, The City appreciates the opportunity to comment on this DEIR, and we look forward to reviewing responses to our comments. If Newport Beach staff can assist in the preparation of responses, please call Assistant City Manager Sharon Wood at 644 -3222 or Traffic and Development Services Manager Rich Edmonston at 644 -3345. Sincerely, Steve Bromberg Mayor