Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout21 - Council Direction on Miscellaneous Items�EW `Rr CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH City Council Staff Report Agenda Item No. 2' September 25, 2012 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: City Manager's Office Dave Kiff, City Manager 949 - 644 -3001, dkiff @newportbeachca.gov PREPARED BY: Dave Kiff, City Manager APPROVED: A TITLE: Further Direction Sought — Paddleboards, Non - Emergency Flyovers, Encroachments. ABSTRACT: From time to time, staff asks the City Council in a public setting to determine whether staff and /or City committees should spend time and resources researching or developing specific policy issues. This helps ensure that resources are not wasted on an item that City Council may not ultimately agree with nor adopt. RECOMMENDATION: Offer specific direction to staff in these areas: 1. Should Harbor Resources staff and /or the Harbor Commission pursue regulations or education efforts regarding Stand -Up Paddleboarding in the Harbor? 2. Should the City pursue an amendment to the Municipal Code that requests that the military provide notice of any non - emergency flyover in the community? 3. Should the City staff proceed with a formal process to analyze various private encroachments onto public lands or public rights -of -way, such as in Santa Ana Heights, Newport Shores, and more? Further Direction Sought — Paddleboards, Non- Emergency Flyovers, Encroachments. September 25, 2012 Page 2 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: There is no fiscal impact related to this specific decision item, but depending on the direction Council takes, some expense can be incurred to research and staff specific issues. DISCUSSION: This item recurs on an intermittent basis. It is an attempt to minimize any use of staff or volunteer time and resources in a direction that might not be in line with the desires of a majority of the City Council. In the spirit of those limited resources, I do not take the time to spell out the nuances of the issues about which we seek guidance. If readers have a specific interest in any one of the issues shown in the recommendation, they should attend the Council meeting and participate in the discussion as a part of public comments about this item. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA ") pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the City Council considers the item). Submitted by: 1C" O. Dave Kiff City Manager Attachment: Response letter from the Department of the Navy 4 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350 -3000 IN REPLY REFER TO: 5730 OLAC -5P 11 Sep 12 The Honorable John Campbell Member, United States House of Representatives 610 Newport Center Drive, Suite 330 Newport Beach, Ca 92660 Attention: Chris Palmer Dear Congressman Campbell: Thank you for your letter of April 23, 2012, on behalf of Mr. Dave Kiff, City Manager of the City of Newport Beach, California. He has concerns about the noise generated by aircraft which took part in the final tribute for a World War II Marine on March 24, 2012. He has asked whether advance notice can be provided to city officials for any future ceremonial flyovers. Your concern in this matter is appreciated, and I regret the delay in responding to your correspondence. We asked the Commanding General, Marine Corps Installations West, Camp Pendleton and the Commanding General, 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing (MAW), San Diego to inquire into Mr. Kiff's concerns. We were informed that by standing directives, the 3d MAW does not assume responsibility for advance coordination with, or notification of, city officials for the municipalities under the air space where aerial support and other air operations are conducted. However, city governments may enact ordinances to regulate or restrict requests from the community for military aerial support for events located within their city limits. As an overview, on March 20, 2012, Headquarters, Marine Corps tasked the 3rd MAW to provide aerial support for the funeral of a Marine Captain Aviator who was highly decorated for his service during World War II. Specifically, the support directed was the execution of a fly -over (consisting of two or four aircraft) for the Marine's memorial service in Newport Beach, California, at the Balboa Yacht Club. When providing aerial support for events in the civilian community such as this, 3D MAW is responsible for coordination with appropriate air - traffic - control agencies and compliance 5730 OLAC -5P 11 Sep 12 with Federal Aviation Administration air -space regulations. In this case, approximately three days prior to executing the funeral fly -over on March 24, 2012, 3D MAW completed detailed air -space coordination with the controlling air - traffic - control agency (Southern California TRACON) via their Support Specialist for Airspace and Procedures. On March 24, 2012, the funeral fly -over was executed with a flight of four F /A -18s that were in radio communication with Southern California Approach Control. It consisted of a single pass at an altitude of 1,000 feet above ground level at an airspeed of 300 knots, with one F /A -18 executing a climbing left turn to an altitude of 3,500 feet to effect the "missing man" formation. Again, thank you for your interest in this matter. If we can be of any further assistance, please let us know. Very respectfully, sM M. L PS Lead Congr ssional Liaison Office of Legislative Affairs Correspondence 2