Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout14 - Support for HR 3643 and HR 4745 Relating to the Interim Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel from San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS)August 9, 2016 Agenda Item No. 14 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Dave Kiff, City Manager - 949-644-3001, dkiff@newportbeachca.gov PREPARED BY: Dave Kiff, City Manager TITLE: Support for HR 3643 and HR 4745 Relating to the Interim Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel from San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) ABSTRACT: Mayor Pro Tem Zur-Schmeide of Laguna Beach has asked Mayor Dixon to sign a letter with the "Concerned Coastal Communities Coalition" in support of legislation that would allow more distant storage of nuclear material from the now closed San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) south of San Clemente. The City's Legislative Platform does not specifically authorize this letter, so Council permission is suggested. _ RECOMMENDATION: a) Determine that the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly; and b) Authorize Mayor Dixon to sign letters as part of the Concerned Coastal Communities Coalition in support of HR 3643 and HR 4745 relating to an interim site for storage of spent fuel rods from SONGS. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: There is no fiscal impact related to this item. DISCUSSION: Cities within some proximity to the now closed San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) have expressed concern about the continued storage of about 1,600 tons of spent fuel rods at the SONGS facility itself as a long-term nuclear waste disposal site is identified and permitted. These cities have noted that the SONGS' facility's ability to be impacted by an earthquake and/or a tsunami increases the possible risk of radioactive leakage from or damage to the rods or the rods' storage facility. 94-t Support for HR 3643 and HR 4745 Relating to the Interim Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel from San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) August 9, 2016 Page 2 Proposed Federal legislation authorizes the US Department of the Interior to enter into contracts with providers for "interim" (medium-term) storage sites that are away from the coast and arguably more protected from the region's damaging natural conditions. Two bills have been introduced — House (of Representatives) bill (HR) 3643 and HR 4745. HR 4745 has sponsorship by our local representatives, including US Representatives Dana Rohrabacher and Darrell Issa. The cities of Dana Point, Del Mar, Huntington Beach, Laguna Beach, Laguna Woods, Oceanside, San Clemente, San Juan Capistrano, and Seal Beach have all agreed to co-sign or are likely to agree to co-sign a letter as a part of the Concerned Coastal Communities Coalition asking our US representatives to support and pass HR 3643 and HR 4745. Drafts of the bills and the letters are attached. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Staff recommends the City Council find this action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. L1 roll d[a1L4rem The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the City Council considers the item). ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — HR 3643 and HR 4745 Attachment B — Draft Letters from the Coalition 14-2 Al1THENTICATE� ATTACHMENT A U. S. GOVERNMENT INF'oRMA7'foN CPO I 114TI1 CONGRESS HeIST SR• 3643 ESSIO To amend the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 to authorize the Secretary of Energy to enter into contracts for the storage of certain high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel, tape title to certain high- level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel, and make certain expendi- tures from the Nuclear Waste Fund. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SEPTEMBER 29, 2015 Mr. CONAWAY (for himself, Mr. ISSA, Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. S A 1 JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. NEuGEMALTER, Mr, I+ARENTHOLD, Ms. MATSUI, NIS. PIN- GIZEE, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. GENE GREENT of Texas, Mr. 111ti ciIANT, Mr. CELBERSON, Mr. SMITII of Texas, and Mr. CARTER of. Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to tl:re Committee on Energy and Commerce A BILL To amend the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 to authorize the Secretary of Energy to enter into contracts for the ,storage of certain high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel, take title to certain high-level radioactive Nvaste and spent nuclear fuel, and make certain expendi- tures from the Nuclear Waste Fund. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2 Lives of the United States of Awrica in Congress assembled, 14-3 2 1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 2 This Act may be cited as the "Interim Consolidated 3 Storage Act of 2 015". 4 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STORAGE 5 FACILITY. 6 Section 2 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1952 7 (42 U.S.C. 10101.) is amended by adding at the end the 8 following nevT paragraph: 9 "(3 5) The term `interim consolidated storage 10 facility' means a facility that possesses a specific li- 11 cense issued by the Commission that authorizes stor- 12 age of high-level radioactive waste or spent nuclear 13 fuel received from the Secretary or from two or more 14 persons that generate or hold title to high-level ra- 15 dioactive waste or spent nuclear fuel generated at a 16 civilian nuclear power reactor.". 17 SEC. 3. INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STORAGE OF HIGH-LEVEL is RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND SPENT NUCLEAR 19 FUEL. 20 (a) STORAGE OF SPENT NUCLEAR, FUEL. ---Section 21 135(h) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 22 U.S.C. 10155(h)) is amended by striking "Notwith- 23 standing any other provisions of law" and inserting "Ex - 24 cept as provided in section 302, and subtitle I of title F. *HR 3643 IH 14-4 3 1 (b) INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STORAGE.—Title I of 2 the Nuclear Waste Policy .pct of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10121 3 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following: 4 "Subtitle I ---Interim Consolidated 5 Storage 6 "SEC. 190. INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STORAGE. 7 "(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary lnay enter into S contracts for the storage of high-level radioactive waste 9 or spent nuclear fuel with any person that holds a license 10 for an interim consolidated storage facility. 11 "(b) DErINITION OF HIGH-LEATEL RADIOACTIVE 12 WASTE. -----,Por purposes of this subtitle and section. 302, 13 the term `high-level radioactive waste' includes Greater 14 than Class C waste as defined in section 72.3 of title K 15 Code of Federal Regulations. Nothing in this section or 16 section 191 shall be interpreted to affect existing judicial 17 interpretation of the term high-level radioactive waste or IS to require the disposal of Greater than Class C waste in 19 a repository. 20 "SEC. 191. CONTRACTS. 21 "(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may enter into 22 new contracts or modify existing contracts with any person 23 who generates or holds title to high-level radioactive waste 24 or spent nuclear fuel of domestic origin for the acceptance 25 of title and subsequent storage of such waste or fuel at •lilt 3643 lli 14-5 4 1 an interim consolidated storage facility, with priority for 2 storage given to High-level radioactive waste and spent nu - 3 clear fuel located on sites without an operating nuclear 4 reactor. 5 "(b) CONTRACT TERTAIS. A contract entered into or 6 modified under this section shall provide that acceptance 7 by the Secretary, and transfer of title under subsection 8 (d), of any high-level radioactive waste or spent nuclear 9 fuel for an interim consolidated storage facility satisfies 10 the Secretary's responsibility under a contract entered 11 into under section 302(a) to accept title to such waste or 12 fuel for disposal, with respect to such accepted waste or 13 fuel. 14 "(c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall not require a 15 person to settle claims against the United States for the 16 breach of a contract entered into under section 302(a) for 17 the disposal of high-level radioactive waste or spent nu - 18 clear fuel as a condition precedent of entering into or 19 iaodifying a contract under this section. 20 "(d) TITLE TO MATERIAL.—Delivery, and acceptance 21 by the Secretary, of any high-level radioactive waste or 22 spent nuclear fuel for an interim consolidated storage fa - 23 cility shall constitute a transfer to the Secretary of title 24 to such waste or fuel.". &HR 3643 IH 14-6 5 1 (c) NUCLEAR WASTE PuND.—Section 302(d) of the 2 Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10222(d)) 3 is amended - 4 (1) in paragraph (4), by striking "in a mon- 5 itored, retrievable storage site" and inserting "in an 6 interim consolidated storage facility or monitored re - 7 trievable storage site,"; 8 (2) in paragraph (5)- 9 (A) by striking "a monitored, retrievable 10 storage site" and inserting "an interim consoli- 11 dated storage facility site, a monitored retriev- 12 able storage site,"; 13 (B) by striking "such repository, mon- 14 itored, retrievable storage facility" and insert - 15 ing "such repository, interim consolidated stor- 16 age facility, inordtored retrievable storage fa.cil- 17 ity,"; and 18 (C) by }striking "; and" and inserting a 19 semicolon; 20 (3) by redesiguating paragraph (6) as para - 21 graph (7); 22 (4) by inserting atter paragraph (5) the fol - 23 IOIN ing: 24 "(6) the fees and costs in connection with the 25 storage of high-level radioactive waste or spent nu - •HR 36543 TH 14-7 6 1 clear fuel in an interim consolidated storage facility; 2 and"; and 3 (5) by inserting "Por purposes of the preceding 4 sentence, fees and costs described in paragraph (6) 5 shall not be considered amounts for the constrciction 6 or expansion of any facility." after "this or subse- 7 quent legislation.". 8 (d) APPROPRIATIONS FROM TIIE WASTE FUND. - 9 Section 302(e)(2) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 10 (42 U.S.C. 10222(e)(2)) is amended - 11 (1) by inserting "(A)" before "The Secretary 12 shall submit"; and 13 (2) by adding at the end the following: 14 "(P) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), subject to 15 subparagraph (C), necessary amounts shall be available to 16 the Secretary from the Waste Fund N)4thout additional ap- 17 propriations to pay for the following: 18 "(i) Costs described in subsection (d)(4) in con - 19 nection ivith storage in an interim consolidated stor- 20 age facility. 21 "(ii) Costs described in subsection (d)(5) in. 22 connection with an interim consolidated storage fa - 23 cility 24 "(iii) Pees and costs described in. subsection 25 (d)(6). .HR 3643 IH 14-8 7 1 "(C) The Secretary shall not expend, on fees for dry 2 modes of storage of high-level radioactive waste or spent 3 nuclear fuel, amounts totaling more than the cumulative 4 amount of interest generated by the Waste Fund each fis- 5 cal year, beginning in fiscal year 2016.". O •HR 3643 IH 14-9 AllTH2NTICATEO V.5. COV ERNMENT INFORMATION GPO I 114TI-I CONGRESS He R• 4745 2D SESSION To amend the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 to authorize the Secretary of Energy to enter into contracts for the storage of certain high-level radioactive waste and Spent nnelear fuel and take title to certain high- level radioactive waste and spent rruclear fuel. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATNES MAzazi 15, 2016 Mr. MuLvANEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce A BILL To amend the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 to authorize the Secretary of Energy to enter into contracts for the storage of certain high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel and take title to certain high-level radio- active waste and spent nuclear fuel. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Pepresenta- 2 tines of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 4 This Act may be cited as the "Interi.m Consolidated 5 Storage Act of 2416". 14-10 2 1 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STORAGE 2 FACILITY. 3 Section 2 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 4 (42 U.S.C. 10101) is amended by adding at the end the 5 following new paragraph: 6 "(35) The term `interim consolidated storage 7 facility' means a facility that possesses a specific li- 8 cense issued by the Commission that authorizes stor- 9 age of high-level radioactive waste or spent nuclear 10 fuel received from the Secretary or from two or more 11 persons that generate or hold title to high-level ra- 12 dioactive waste or spent nuclear fuel. generated at a 13 civilian nuclear power reactor.". 14 SEC. 3. INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STORAGE OF HIGH-LEVEL 15 RADIOACTIVE WASTE :AND SPENT NUCLEAR 16 FUEL. 17 (a) STORAGE OF SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL.—Section 18 135(h) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 19 U.S.C. 10155(h)) is amended by striking "Notwith- 20 standing any other provision of law" and inserting "Ex - 21 sept as provided in section 302, and subtitle I of title I". 22 (b) INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STORAGE.—Title I of 23 the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of. 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10121 24 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following: el -IR 4745 IH 3 J 1 "Subtitle I—Interim Consolidated 2 Storage 3 "SEC. 190. INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STORAGE. 4 "(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may enter into 5 contracts for the storage of high-level radioactive waste 6 or spent nuclear fuel with any person that holds a license 7 for an interim consolidated storage facility. 8 "(b) DEFINITION OF HIGII-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE 9 WASTE.—Por purposes of this subtitle and section 302, 10 the term `high-level radioactive waste' inehldes Greater 11 than Class C waste as defined in section 72.3 of title 10, 12 Code of Federal Regulations. Nothing in this section or 13 section 191 shall be interpreted to affect existing judicial 14 interpretation of the term high-level radioactive waste or 15 to require the disposal of Greater than Class C waste in 16 a repository. 17 "SEC. 191. CONTRACTS. 18 "(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, may enter into 19 new contracts or modify existing contracts AN ith any person 20 who generates or holds title to high-level radioactive waste 21 or spent nuclear fuel of domestic origin for the acceptance 22 of title and subsequent storage of such waste or fuel at 23 an interim consolidated storage facility, with priority for 24 storage given to high-level radioactive waste and spent nu - .HR 4745 IH 14-12 4 1 clear fuel located on sites �, rithout an operating nuclear 2 reactor. 3 "(b) CONTRACT TERms. A contract entered into or 4 modified under this section shall provide that acceptance 5 by the Secretary, and transfer of title under subsection 6 (d), of any high-level radioactive waste or spent nuclear 7 fuel for an interim consolidated storage facility satisfies 8 the Secretary's responsibility under a contract entered 9 into under section 302(x) to accept title to such waste or 10 fuel for disposal, with respect to such accepted waste or 11 fuel. 12 "(c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall not require a 13 person to settle claims against the United States for the 14 breach of a contract entered into under section 302(x) for 15 the disposal of high-level radioactive waste or spent nu - 16 clear fuel as a condition precedent of entering into or 17 modifying a contract under this section. 18 "(d) TITLE TO NIATERL9.L.—Delivery, and acceptance 19 by the Secretary, of any high-level radioactive waste or 20 spent nuclear fuel for an interim consolidated storage fa - 21 cility shall constitute a transfer to the Secretary of title 22 to such waste or fuel.". 23 (e) NUCLEAR WASTE YUND.-----Section 302(d) of the 24 Nuelear Waste Policy pct of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10222(d)) 25 is amended— .HR 4745 IH 14-13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 5 (1) in paragraph (4), by striking "in a mon- itored, retrievable storage site" and inserting "in an interim consolidated storage facility or monitored re- trievable storage site,"; (2) in paragraph (5)— (A) by striking "a monitored, retrievable storage site" and inserting "an interim consoli- dated storage facility site, a monitored retriev- able storage site,"; (B) by striking "such repository, mon- itored, retrievable storage facility" and insert- ing "such repository, interim consolidated stor- age facility, monitored retrievable storage facil- ity,"; and (C) by striking "; arid" and inserting a semicolon; (3) by redesignating paragraph (6) as para- graph (7); (4) by inserting after paragraph (5) the fol- lowing: "(6) the fees and costs in connection with the storage of high-level radioactive waste or spent nu- clear fuel in an interim consolidated storage facility; and"; and •HR 4746 III 14-14 I 1 (5) by inserting '`Por purposes of the preceding 2 sentence, fees and costs described in paragraph (6) 3 shall not be considered amounts for the construction 4 or expansion of any facility." after "this or subse- 5 quent legislation.". O *HR 4745 IH 14-15 ATTACHMENT B Concerned Coastal Communities Coalition artie n May_, 2016 City of Laguna Beach Honorable Michael K, Conaway United States House of Representatives 2430 Rayburn House Office Building City of San Clemente Washington, DC 20515 City of Laguna Woods Dear Congressman Conaway, City of Dana Point The Concerned Coastal Communities Coalition writes to express Its strong support for H.R. 3643, the Interim Consolidated Storage Act of 2015. As California coastal cities in close proximity to the now closed San Onofre Nuclear Power Generating Station (SONGS) located In northern San Diego County, we have a longstanding interest in the proper operation of nuclear power plants. Today, given the closure of the SONGS facility, we have an even greater interest in the decommissioning of such plants and the removal of high-level radioactive waste, Nuclear power was first generated bythe SONGS facility nearly fifty years ago, when the Unit 1 reactor began operating In 1968. Two additional units came on line in 1983 and 1984, generating up to 2,200 megawatts of electricity. The first reactor unit ceased operating in 1992, while the second and third reactors were shut down in 2013 due to premature wear found on over 3,000 tubes in replacement steam generators. SONGS is currently In the initial stages of decommissioning. More than 7 million Californians live within 50 miles of SONGS, Communities in our coalition represent the front line and are the most likely to be Impacted if radioactive material were to leak. City leaders and residents alike continue to monitor and participate in the decommissioning process. We remain hopeful that the decades of work necessary to protect our environment and ensure public safety proceeds expeditiously, However, we remain deeply concerned that the accumulated high-level radioactive waste will remain on the site --either in liquid pools or dry casks—for an indefinite period of time due to the lack of a national or regional repositories. Given the seismic and related tsunami threats that exists in the region, long-term storage of this radioactive material at the SONGS site is simply unacceptable, The communities participating in our coalition are hardly alone in their concern for the potential threat posed by spent nuclear fuel languishing at nuclear facilities in their backyard. Currently, the nation's inventory of spent nuclear fuel Is being stored at the sites where it was generated, including at the 61 still -operating nuclear power 1401 Dove Street, Suite 330, Newport Beach, California 92660 5-17-16111 A(1)-2 14-15 plants and 14 shut -down reactor sites. Just as with SONGS, we strongly believe that the hazardous material at these facilities should be removed as quickly and safety as possible. H.R. 3643 offers a much needed path forward for the removal of spent fuel and high-level waste from nuclear power plants. By authorizing the Department of Energy to enter Into new contracts with operators of interim consolidated storage facilities, the legislation provides an option for removing this hazardous material from urban communities like ours, rather than waiting for resolution to the endless debates over the penultimate site to deposit our nations' nuclear waste, We are particularly pleased that the bill enjoys such strong bipartisan support, including from California Representatives Darrell Issa, Doris Matsui, Jared Huffman, Ami Bera, Duncan Hunter, Scott Peters, Ken Calvert and Dana Rohrabacher, Thank you for your diligent work to advance this important legislation, We are eager to assist you in this endeavor and would be happy to offer testimony or any other manner of support to help ensure its passage In the 114th Congress. Sincerely, 5-17-16 1 1 1A(1)-3 14-16 Concerned Coastal Communities Coalition F I I sifts May__, 2016 City of Laguna Beach Honorable Mick Mulvaney United States House of Representatives 2419 Rayburn House Office Building City of San Clemente Washington, DC 20515 City of Laguna Woods Dear Congressman Mulvaney, City of Dana Point The Concerned Coastal Communities Coalition writes to express its strong support for H.R. 4745, the Interim Consolidated Storage Act of 2016, As California coastal cities in close proximity to the now closed San Onofre Nuclear Power Generating Station (SONGS) located in northern San Diego County, we have a longstanding interest In the proper operation of nuclear power plants. Today, given the closure of the SONGS facility, we have an even greater interest In the decommissioning of such plants and the removal of high-level radioactive waste. Nuclear power was first generated by the SONGS facility nearly fifty years ago, when the Unit 1 reactor began operating in 1968. Two additional units came on line in 1983 and 1984, generating up to 2,200 megawatts of electricity. The first reactor unit ceased operating In 1992, while the second and third reactors were shut down in 2013 due to premature wear found on over 3,000 tubes in replacement steam generators. SONGS is currently in the initial stages of decommissioning. More than 7 million Californians live within 50 miles of SONGS. Communities in our coalition represent the front line and are the most likely to be impacted if radioactive material were to leak. City leaders and residents alike continue to monitor and participate in the decommissioning process, We remain hopeful that the decades of work necessary to protect our environment and ensure public safety proceeds expeditiously. However, we remain deeply concerned that the accumulated high-level radioactive waste will remain on the site—either In liquid pools or dry casks—for an indefinite period of time due to the lack of a national or regional repositories. Given the seismic and related tsunami threats that exists in the region, long-term storage of this radioactive material at the SONGS site is simply unacceptable. The communities participating in our coalition are hardly alone in their concern for the potential threat posed by spent nuclear fuel languishing at nuclear facilities in their backyard. Currently, the nation's Inventory of spent nuclear fuel is being stored at the sites where it was generated, including at the 61 still -operating nuclear power 1401 Dove Street, Suite 330, Newport Beach, California 92660 5-17-16111 A(1)-4 14-17 plants and 14 shut -down reactor sites, Just as with SONGS, we strongly believe that the hazardous material at these facilities should be removed as quickly and safely as possible, H.R. 4745 offers a much needed path forward for the removal of spent fuel and high-level waste from nuclear power plants. By authorizing the Department of Energy to enter Into new contracts with operators of Interim consolidated storage facilities, the legislation provides an option for removing this hazardous material from urban communities like ours, rather than waiting for resolution to the endless debates over the penultimate site to deposit our nations' nuclear waste. We are pleased to note the strong bipartisan support for the bill expressed by the California Legislature, which recently passed a joint resolution sponsored by state Senator Pat Bates which urges Congress and President Obama to approve H.R, 4745. Thank you for your diligent work to advance this important legislation. We are eager to assist you in this endeavor and would be happy to offer testimony or any other manner of support to help ensure Its passage in the 114th Congress, Sincerely, 5-17-16 / 11 A(1)-5 14-18