HomeMy WebLinkAbout04 - Cooperative Agreement to Implement TMDL ProgramJ �
Agenda Item No. 4
June 26, 2012
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Public Works Department
Stephen G. Badum, Public Works Director
949 - 644- 3311,sbadum @newportbeachca.gov
PREPARED BY: John Kappeler, Water Quality Manager
APPROVED:
ti
TITLE: Cooperative Agreement to Implement Total Maximum Daily Load
Programs for Nutrients, Fecal Coliform Bacteria and Toxics in the
Newport Bay Watershed
ABSTRACT:
Staff recommends the City of Newport Beach sign a new Cooperative Agreement to
implement nutrient, fecal coliform bacteria and toxics Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
programs within the Newport Bay Watershed.
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute Cooperative Agreement D11 -066 to fund
the TMDL programs, studies and monitoring for the Newport Bay Watershed.
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Funding requirements under this agreement are included in the operations and maintenance
section of FY12/13 budget (Account No. 5060 - 80809). The total TMDL budget for FY 2012-
13 is approximately $1.5 million of which the City's share is approximately $113,000.
DISCUSSION:
The Newport Bay Watershed has creeks and bay water quality impairments caused by
nutrient, fecal coliform bacteria and toxic pollutants where impairment has been defined by
Section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act. (Note there is also impairment by sediment
which is covered under a separate cooperative agreement). The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency and the State Water Resources Control Board via the California Regional
Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region (Regional Board) are directed to prepare
clean up plans called TMDLs for the watershed. TMDLs require the reduction of pollutant
Cooperative Agreement to Implement Total Maximum Daily Load Programs for Nutrients, Fecal Coliform Bacteria and
Toxics in the Newport Bay Watershed
June 26, 2012
Page 2
loads within a prescribed schedule. The requirements of the TMDLs are incorporated into the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer
System Permit.
For our watershed (San Diego Creek /Newport Bay), the entities responsible for
implementing this TNIDL are the County of Orange, Orange County Flood Control District,
Irvine Ranch Water District, Irvine Company, Lennar Homes of California, and the Cities of
Costa Mesa, Irvine, Laguna Hills, Laguna Woods, Lake Forest, Newport Beach, Orange,
Santa Ana and Tustin. Each of the listed parties cooperates via a Cooperative Agreement
(formally executed in September 2003 and amended in 2006 and 2009, which went to
Council on June 24, 2003, June 26, 2006, and March 24, 2009, respectively) to implement
and administer the obligations of the TMDLs. The latest agreement terminates in June 2012.
The proposed revised Agreement provides for an agreement term through June 30, 2015.
The Agreement may be renewed for an additional three -year term with approval of the
parties. The Agreement includes a funding formula developed by the partners to implement
the TMDL programs in the Newport Bay watershed. Under the new agreement, a revised
funding formula was reviewed and approved by the management staff to better appropriate
and fairly distribute the programs cost. The City's share of the TMDL management, planning
and monitoring cost will increase from 6.5% to 7.55 %, however, we expect the City's total
overall cost for this TMDL compliance program will go down in the long term as individual
project cost have been limited or removed from the base budget and will be charged back to
the responsible or directly affected agencies.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
Staff recommends the City Council find this action is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQX) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not
result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change In the environment) and
15060(c)(3) (Architectural and Engineering services is not a project as defined in Section
15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3,
because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or
indirect:y.
NOTICING:
The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the
meeting at which the City Council considers the item).
Submitted by:
A, Cooperative Agreement (D11 -066)
z
Agreement No. Dll -066
AGREEMENT TO FUND NUTRIENT, FECAL COLIFORM AND TOXICS TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY
LOAD ( "TMDL ") PROGRAMS IN THE NEWPORT BAY WATERSHED
THIS AGREEMENT, for purposes of identification munbeved D11 -066, referred to hereinafter as
"AGREEMENT ", is made and entered into this _ day of .201_, by and between the
County of Orange ( "COUNTY "), the Orange County Flood Control District ("DISTRICT "), the City of
Costa Mesa ( "COSTA MESA "), the City of Irvine (" TRVINE "), the City of Laguna Hills ( "LAGUNA
HILLS "), the City of Laguna Woods ( "LAGUNA WOODS "), the City of Lake Forest ( "LAKE FOREST "),
the City of Newport Beach ( "NEWPORT BEACH "), the City of Orange ( "ORANGE "), the City of Santa
Ana ('BANTA ANA"), the City of Tustin ( "TUSTIN "), the Irvine Ranch Water District ( "IRWD ") and the
Irvine Company ( "TIC "), and Lemur Homes of California, Inc( "LENNAR "). The fourteen entities are
hereinafter sometimes jointly referred to as the "PARTIES" and 'individually as "PARTY." The cities are
hereinafter sometimes jointly referred to as the "CITIES." The CITIES, COUNTY and DISTRICT are
hereinafter sometimes jointly referred to as the "MUNICIPAL PARTIES." Thirteen entities (all entities
exceptfor LENNAR) are sometimes jointly referred to as the "ORIGINAL PARTIES."
WYfNESSETH
WHEREAS, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region
( "REGIONAL BOARD ") has adopted Resolution No. 98 -9, as amended by Resolution No. 98 -100
amending the Water Quality Control Planfor [lie Santa Ana River Basin to incorporate a Nutrient TMDL
for the Newport Bay /San Diego Creek Watershed on April 17,1998 and Resolution 99 -10 amending the
Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin to incorporate a TMDL for Fecal Coliform in
Newport Bay on April 9,1999 pursuantto the provisions of section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act; and,
WHEREAS, the United States Environmenhl Protection Agency (USEPA) has established TMDLs
for toxic pollutants, for San Diego Creek and Newport Bay, California on June 14, 2002, and the
REGIONAL BOARD is developing implementation plans for each of the toxic pollutants; and,
Page 1 of 22
Agreement No. D11 -066
WHEREAS, the adopted TMDLs contain requirements for studies, monitoring, and the
development of programs to attain TMDL reduction targets over a multi-year period; and,
WHEREAS,.these TMDLs are included in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
( "NPDES ") Municipal Permit Order No. RS- 2009 -0030 that require a cooperative watershed program;
and, .
WHEREAS, the ORIGINAL PARTIES entered into Agreement No. D99 -128 on
September 18, 2003 and subsequent amendments on July 5, 2006, March 29, 2008 and July 8, 2010 to
provide funding for the Nutrient, Fecal Coliform, and Toxics Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
studies in the Newport Bay Watershed; and,
WI-IEREAS, the PARTIES intend this AGREEMENT as a successor to Agreement No. D99 -128 to
provide for the performance of studies, research, monitoring, development and /or revision of programs
related to the adopted TMDU for nutrients, fecal coliform and toxics and current and future Clean Water
Act §303(d) listings, as well as planning, permitting, design, construction, and maintenance of TMDL
pilot projects ( "PILOT PROJECTS "); and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES have reached agreement on a funding formula which is shown in
Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, in the event that long -term watershed funding is secured prior to AGREEMENT
expiration, the PARTIES intend to amend the AGREEMENT to incorporate this funding through revised
cost share allocations; and,
WHEREAS, it is recognized that regulatory comipbance gaited through the activities herein
apply to all PARTIES equally, and
WI IEREAS, it is recognized that additional compliance efforts may be necessary and the
PARTIES may choose to fund projects under separate agreements; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the PARTIES agree as follows:
Page 2 of 22
I
Agreement No. Dll -066
Section 1. PURPOSE. TMs. AGREEMENT is entered into for the purpose of funding and
performing program acHvities related to the adopted TMDLs for nutrients, fecal coliform, and toxics and
current and future Clean Water Act §303(d) listings in the Newport Bay Watershed.
Section 2, TERM, The term of this AGREEMENT shall commence upon approval and execution
of this AGREEMENT by all PARTIES or July 1, 2012, whichever is later, and shall continue until June 30,
2015. The AGREEMENT may be renewed for an additional three (3) year term rum -drag July 1, 2015 to
June 30, 201E with approval of the PARTIES.
Section 3. PROGRAM WORK PLAN. The COUNTY shall work in concert with all PARTIES to
develop a work plan for the.following fiscal year. The work plan for the upcoming fiscal year shall be
submitted to each of the PARTIES by December 15 of each year. The work plan may designate a PARTY
as a lead other than the COUNTY for a work plan task(s).
Section 4. BUDGET AND COSTS. The COUNTY shall work in concert with all the PARTIES to
develop a budget for the following fiscal year. Budgeted amounts for PILOT PROJECT(S) shall not exceed
$200,000 for all pilot projects in anyone fiscal year. The budget for the upcoming fiscal year shall be
submitted to each of the PARTIES by December 15 of each year. The budget shall conta n an explanation
of any recommended program changes, an estimate of all plarvied expenditures and an estimate of the
payment required from each PARTY for the following fiscal year.
The COUNTY shall be entitled to charge to the program all costs for direct labor, materials,
equipment and outside contract services for costs associated with carrying out the approved scope of
work. Recoverable costs will also include an overhead charge.
Section 5. WORK PLAN TASK LEAD REIMBURSEMENT. If a PARTY is designated as a task
lead, upon written authorization from COUNTY, the PARTY shall invoice the COUNTY for authorized
expenses up to the approved budget amount for the work plain task.
Section 6. APPROVALS AND ADJUSTMENTS. The PARTIES shall be permitted to review and
approve the budget and program work plan for the forthconung year, review work products, and
provide direction for performance of the work plan. The PARTIES shall be notified of the intent to issue
Page 3 of 22
Agreement No. D11 -066
contracts to perform. the program work plan, shall be permitted to participate in the preparation and
review of the scope of work for such contracts, and to serve on the committee evaluating consultant
qualifications /proposals subject to the requirements of the County of Orange Contract Policy Manual.
Criterion for approval of the work plan and budget shall be affirmative responses h om PARTIES
representing ninety percent (90 %) of the Cost Share Percentage in Exhibit A and 12 of the 13 PARTIES.
The COUNTY and DISTRICT will constitute one approving PARTY. Any PARTY not providing a
response by July 15 of each year shall be considered as rendering an affirmative response.
Criterion for approval of adjustments to scopes of work shall be the same as for the approval of
the work plan and budget.
Section 7. FUNDING COST SHARE ALLOCATIONS. Exhibit A, which is attached to this
AGREEMENT and by this reference is made a part hereof, presents the funding formula and the fiscal
year 2012 -13 cost share percentages for the PARTIES. Land area calculations will be reviewed and
revised as needed. A request for information documenting changes in land area will be made to the
PARTIES each year by November 1.
Section S. PAYMENTS. The COUNTY shall invoice each PARTY for its annual deposit at the
begiiu.ing of each fiscal year. Each PARTY shall pay the deposit within 45 calendar days of the date of
the invoice. Each PARTY'S deposit shall be based on its prorated share of the approved annual budget,
reduced. by the sum of (a) its prorated share of any surplus identified in the prior fiscal year end
accounting, and (b) its prorated share of any funding provided for programs in the approved budget .
from entities not party to this AGREEMENT.
.Interest earned on the PARTIES' deposits will not be paid to the PARTIES, but will be credited
against the PARTIES' share of the program costs.
The COUNTY shall notify each of the PARTIES if it appears that costs may exceed the budget
approved by the PARTIES in any fiscal year. The COUNTY shall prepare a fiscal year end accounting
within 60 calendar days of the end of the fiscal year. If the fiscal year end accounting results in costs (net
of interest earnings) exceeding the sum of the deposits, and the COUNTY has notified and obtained
Page 4 of 22
Agreement No. DII -066
approval from the PARTIES of potential cgst overruns, the COUNTY shall seek approval of the excess
cost from the PARTIES in the form of a revised budget and, upon approval, shall invoice each PARTY for
its prorated share of the excess cost up to the amount of the revised approved budget. Each PARTY shall
pay the billing within 45 calendar days of the date of the invoice. If the fiscal year end accounting results
in the stun of the deposits exceeding costs (net of interest earnings), the excess deposits will carry forward
to reduce the billings for the following year. The fiscal year end accounting results and associated
invoices for each PARTY will take into consideration any outside funding provided for programs in the
approved budget from entities not party to this AGREEMENT.
Upon termination of the program, a final accounting sball be performed by the COUNTY. If
costs remaining after the deduction of interest costs exceed the sum of the deposits, the COUNTY shall
invoice each PARTY for its prorated share of the deficit. Each PARTY shall pay the invoice within 45
calendar days of the date of the invoice. If the sum of the deposits, including interest, exceeds the costs,
the COUNTY shall reimburse to each PARTY its prorated share of the excess, within 45 calendar days of
the final accounting.
Section 9. ADDITIONAL PARTIES. It is recognized that there may be other parties who wish to
participate in and provide funding for the activities described in this AGREEMENT. Nothing in this
AGREEMENT is intended to preclude additional participants being added by written amendment as
parties to this AGREEMENT pursuant to Section 10. Cost allocations for the additional parties and
PARTIES will be revised based on the funding formula in Exhibit A.
Section 10. AMENDMENT. This AGREEMENT may be amended in writing only with the
unanimous written approval of the parties.
Section 11. LIABILITY. It is mutually understood and agreed that, merely by the virtue of
entering into this AGREEMENT, each PARTY neither relinquishes any rights nor assumes any liabilities
for its own actions or the actions of other PARTIES. Iris the intent of the PARTIES that the rights and
liabilities of each Party shall remain the same, while this AGREEMENT is in force, as it was before this
AGREEMENT was made, except as otherwise specifically provided in this agreement.
Page 5 of 22
7
Agreement No. Dll -066
Section 12. TERMINATION. Any PARTY wishing to terminate its participation in this
AGREEMENT shall so notify all other PARTIES in writing by March 1 of any year. Such termination
shall be effective the following June 30. The terminating PARTY shall be responsible for financial
obligations hereunder to the extent incurred in accordance with this agreement by the PARTY prior to the
effective date of termination. The balance of the PARTIES may continue in the performance of the terms
and conditions of this AGREEMENT on the basis of a revised allocation of cost based on the funding
formula in Exhibit A.
Section 13. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS. The obligation of each PARTY is subject to the
availability of funds appropriated for this purpose, and nothing herein shall be construed as obligating
the PARTIES to expend or as involving the PARTIES in any contract or, other obligation for the future
payment of money in excess of appropriations authorized by law.
Section 14. NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. Nothing expressed or mentioned in this
AGREEMENT is intended or shall be construed to give any person, other than the PARTIES hereto and
any entity in which a PARTY has a legal interest (such as, but not limited to, a limited liability
membership interest or a partnership interest), and any permitted successors or assigns of a PARTY, any
legal or equitable right remedy or claim under or in respect of this AGREEMENT or any provisions
herein contained. This AGREEMENT and any conditions and provisions hereof is intended to be and is
for the sole and exclusive benefit of the PARTIES and the entities in which they have a legal interest and
thew successors or assigns and for the benefit of no other person, agency or entity.
Section 15. REFERENCE TO CALENDAR DAYS. Any reference to the word "day" or "clays"
herein shall mean calendar day or calendar days, respectively, unless otherwise expressly provided.
Section 16. ATTORNEYS FEES. In any action or proceeding brought to enforce or interpret any
provision of this AGREEMENT, or where any provision hereof is asserted as a defense, each. PARTY shall
bear its Dwn attorneys' fees and costs.
Section 17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This AGREEMENT is intended by the PARTIES as a final
expression of their agreement and intended to be a complete and exclusive statemeut of the agreement
Page 6 of 22
J
Agreement No. Dll -066
and understanding of the PARTIES hereto in respect of the subject matter contained herein. There are no
restrictions, promises, warranties or undertakings, other than those set forth or referred to herein. This
AGREEMENT supersedes all prior agreements and understandings between the PARTIES with respect to
such matter:
Section 18. SEVERABILITY. If any part of this AGREEMENT is held, determined or adjudicated
to be illegal, void, or unenforceable by a court of competentjtu,isdiction, the remainder of this
AGREEMENT shall be given effect to the fullest extent reasonably possible.
Section 19. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. The terms and provisions of this AGREEMENT shall
be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the PARTIES hereto and their successors and assigns.
Section 20. NOTICES. All notices requb ed or desired to be given under this AGREEMENT shall
be in writing and (a) delivered personally, or (b) sent by certified mail, return receipt requested or (c) sent
by electronic mail followed by a mailed copy, to the addresses specified below, provided each PARTY
may change the address for notices by giving the other PARTIES at least ten (10) days written notice of
the new address. Notices shall be deemed received when actually received in the office of the addressee
or when delivery is refused, as shown on the receipt of the U.S. Postal service, or other person making the
delivery, except that notices sent by electronic mail shall be deemed received on the first business day
following transmission.
Director of Public Services
City of Costa Mesa
P.O. Box 1200
Costa Mesa, CA 92628 -1200
Facsimile: (714) 754-5028
Director of Community Development
City of Irvine
P.O. Box 19578
Irvine, CA 92623' -9578
Facsimile: (949) 724 -6440
Director of Public Services
City of Laguna Hills
24035 El Torn Road
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
Facsimile: (949) 707 -2633
Page 7 of 22
19
Agreement No. Dll -066
Director of Community Development
City of Laguna Woods
24264 El Toro Road
Laguna Woods CA 92637
Facsimile: (949) 639 -0591
Director of Public Works
City of Lake Forest
25550 Commercentre Dr. Suite 100
Lake Forest, CA 92630
Facsimile: (949) 461 -3511
Director of Public Works
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Blvd.
Newport Beach, CA 92658
Facsimile: (949) 718 -1840
Director of Public Works
City of Orange
300 E. Cbapman Ave
Orange, CA 92866
Facsimile: (714) 744 -5573
Director of Public Works
City of Santa Ana
101 W. 411, St.
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Facsimile: (714) 649 -5635
Director of Public Works
City of Tustin
300 Ceutermial Way
Tustin, CA 92780
Facsimile: (714) 734 -8991
Director, OC Public Works
County of Orange
300 N. Flower Street
Santa Ana, CA 92702 -4048
Facsimile: (714) 834 -2395
Executive Director of Water Policy
Irvine Ranch Water District
15600 Sand Canyon Avenue
Irvine, CA 92618
Facsimile: (949) 453 -0228
Vice President of Environmental Affairs
The Irvine Company
550 Newport Center
Page 8 of 22
0
Agreement No. D11 -066
Newport Beach, CA 92658 -8904
Facsimile: (949) 720 -2448
Vice President of Commmrity Development
Lennar
25 Enterprise, Ste 400
AUso Viejo, CA 92656
Facsimile; (949)349 -0394
Section 21. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT. This AGREEMENT may be executed in counterpart
and the signed counterparts shall constitute a single instrument.
Section 22. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE. This AGREEMENT has been negotiated and
executed in the State of Califoria and shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of
California. In the event of any legal action to eirforce or interpret this AGREEMENT, the sole and
exclusive venue shall be a court of competent jurisdiction located in Orange County, California, and the
PARTIES hereto agree to and do hereby submit to the jurisdiction of such coma, notwithstanding Code of
Civil Procedm'e section 394. Furthermore, the PARTIES have specifically agreed, as part of the
consideration given and received for entering into this AGREEMENT, to waive any and all rights to
request that an action be transferred for trial to another county under Code of Civil Procedure Section 394
or any other provision of law.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have executed this AGREEMENT the day and
year first above written:
Page 9 of 22
d
Date:
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM
COUNTY COUNSEL
By
Deputy
Date:
Agreement No. D11 -066
COUNTY OF ORANGE,
a political subdivision of the State of
Califarnia
Chairman of the Board of Supervisors
ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
a body corporate and politic
Chairman of the Board of Supervisors
SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY OF THIS
AGREEMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO THE
CHAIR OF THE BOARD,
By
Susan Novak
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of
Orange County; California
Page 10 of 22
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF COSTA MESA
Mayor
City Attorney of Costa Mesa
Page 11 of 22
Agreement No. D11 -066
J
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTEST:
City Ced(
CITY OF IRVINE
Mayor
City Attorney of Irvine
Page 12 of 22
Agreement No. D11 -066
E
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTEST:
City clerk .
CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Mayor
City Attorney of Laguna Hillc
Page 13 of 22
Agreement No. Dll -066
m
Date:
APPROVLD AS TO FORM:
ATTGST:
City Clerk
CITY OF LAGUNA WOODS.
Mayor
City Attorney of Laguna Woods
Page 14 of 22
Agreement No. Dll -066
i k'
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
INilY:4U
City Clerk
CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Mayor
City Attorney of Lake Forest
Page 15 of 22
Agreement No. Dll -066
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH'
Mayor
=4
City Attoz`ney of Newport Beach
Page 16 of 22
Agreement No. D11 -066
I�
Agreement No. D11 -066
CITY OF ORANGE
By:
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTEST:
City Clerk City Attorney of Orange
Page 17 of 22
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
GTIYYxYN
City Cled(
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Mayor
City Attorney of Santa Ana
Page 18 of 22
Agreement No. D11 -066
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF TUSTIN
Mayo),
City Attorney of Tustin
Page 19 of 22
Agreement No. Dll -066
�i
Date
Agreement No. D11 -066
THE IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT
By:
Name:
Title:
Date: By:
Name:
Title:
Page M of 22
Date
Date
THE IRVINE COMPANY
By:
Name:
Title:
By:
Name:
Title:
Page 21 of 22
Agreement No. D11 -066
Date:
Agreement No. Dl1 -066
Lennar Homes of California,
By: _
Name:
Title:
Date: By:
Name:
Title:
Page 22 of 22
Agreement No. DII -066
EXHIBIT A
FUNDING FORMULA AND FISCAL 2012 -13 COST SHARE PERCENTAGES
;JURISDICTION
1
TOTAI
SQUARE
MII ES7
SQ MILES '::
WITHIN
WA T"
NL1
LAND;.
�TiEAz
PERCENTAGE
OF CITY
L,4u- AREA
W 9.... PT1
TO
TOT
POPULATIOIT"
"
ESTIMATED
POPULATIO ITT
' IN
' GV STERSHED =-
4l?EIGHTED 1
LA�ID'AREA
g
PO SIILA ON
'
V GHTED"
BI
NEI LADTD'
AREA
SHARE2 - .
FISCAL YEAR;
201213 COST
SHARE"
,PERCENTAGES8_
Costa Mesa
15.83
7.65
7.54
48.33
110,146
53,229
2.2
2.06
4.28
County of
Orange
17523
16.68
14.25
9.52
121,488
11,564
3.16
3.89
7.05
Irvine
65.98
65.80
50.82
99.73
219,156
218,558
12.58
13.89
26.46
La .Hills
6.64
1.18
1 -16
17.77
30,410
5,4041
0.271
032
0.59
La°una WODds
3.31
1.88
1.88
56.80
16,224
9,215
045
0.51
0.96
Lake Forest
16.78
11.58
9.18
69.01
L 77,490
53,476
2.68
2.51
5.19
Neivport Beach
24.74
17.63
14.58
71.26
85,376
60,840 3.56
3.93
7.55
Oxangge
2558
1.88
1.73
7.29
136,995
9,990
0.47
0.47
0.94
Santa Ana
27.35
16.40
16.17
59.96
325,228 195,018
6.35
4.42
10.77
Tustin 1 11.14
1114
10.49
100.00
75,781
75,781
3.19
2.871
6.06
OCFC District
-
-
-
10.00
IRWD
10.00
twine Co.
10.00
Lermax
-
-
-
-
-
0.15
,355:49
^:.: u- 151r:82
`1.127:80.
:' -' :1,198,294
.::,:. : °693`076:
'; 34:925
34:925'
' ' `' 10000:
' Source: OC Public Works, OC Survey Section May 2011
' NET LAND AREA = Square miles within Walershed- E)dractions for NPDES, Federal, State, County, IRWD, Irvine Company and Lennar
' PERCENTAGE OF CITY LAND AREA IN WATERSHED = Square miles within Watershedfrotal Square Miles' 100
Source: State of California, Department of Finance, E -1 Population Estimates for Cities, Counties and the State with Annual Percentage Change (May 2011 as updated)
s ESTIMATED POPULATION IN WATERSHED - Total Population' Percentage of City Land Area in Watershed/100
e WEIGHTED LAND AREA & POPULATION SHARE = ((Square Miles within Walershedfrotal Square Miles of Watershed)'0.5) + ((Estimated Population in Watershed/Total Estimated
Population in Watershed)'0.5) x 34.925
7 WEIGHTED NET LAND AREA SHARE = Net Land Area/Total Net Land Area " 34.925
9 COST SHARE PERCENTAGE = Weighted Land Area & Population Share + Weighted Net Land Area Share
Page A -1
v