HomeMy WebLinkAbout01 - Appendix B Part 2VaMMM n
Volume 1
Report of Geotechnical Studies
Proposed Newport Banning Ranch Development
City of Newport Beach /County of Orange
Plates 8.9 - 17
Prepared for:
Newport Banning Ranch LLC
Prepared By:
GMU Geotechnical, Inc.
July 2011
9
9'
(South)
(North)
120
120
GB -9
(Projected 1701
Existing Ground Surface
80
West Coast H ighway
80
w
w
Z_
u
Z_
Z
. Q,tm.. ,
Z
0
40—
>
of -----------------------------------
- __- ______________ - --
-—
>
W
J
___ __ ____
____
rMUo
- ------- —- --
� - - - - ".- - —
-- --
- -- -- ----_— _ -- ---
-
o cMSu
W
Qcol - _- _
- __— --- __ -- -
EXPLANATION
Qal
Alluvium
_
`s
Notes:
Queried here 1. All locatimuareapproximate.
Queried Where Unkrwwn 2. Qspls la,formaaga has
0 40 80 120
Approximate Graphic Scale
beddi&mntnll
ru
general structural
been drawn to Illustrate the general
Horizontal:
1 Inch Equals 80 Feet
In
of
Man Made Fill
nature set g=ntle olds, wargrg cross bedding and minor
hn, cross
Strike and Dip of Bed fault oHSetz.
Qail
Colluvium/Slopewash
Deposits
I�g
I. -t --
Groundwater Table
IQ —1-1
L
Marine Terrace Deposits
San Pedro Formation
FJMtJ
GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION
9 9'
PLATE
GECEFECHNICAL, INC. Project
ect Name:
Project No:
J
Date:
8.9
Newport Banning Ranch 06- 163 -00
July
2011
10
10'
(South)
(North)
120
120
Existing Ground Surface
B -5
(Projected 170 Feet))
w
sa
so
West Coast Highway
Qtm
LL
z
z
O40
_____________ ____ _ ____ ___ _ S___ ___.._______________.�_._z_.__— _ - _______
40 O
- -_ —_ --
of- -` —_
\� 28 ___ __ - -- —
6
— — _
- - -__ — __— - -_ —
(M8L) 0 _ _
-- Q— _— _- z- --__.: _--- _ —_ —__—
_ —_— -- _ - - - -__
_
—
_ - -- __-- —
-40
EXPLANATION
Oal
Alluvium?
Notes:
Geologic Contact, 1. All locations area roximate.
Fp
Q ueried Where Unknown 2. Beddirilto in Ospis largelydiagamwrera and has
0 40 80 120
Approximate Graphic Scale
of
Man Made Fill
been drawn m illustrate [w in, c...s general ud minor
nature (I.e. gentle folds, warpng crass bedding ant mimr
Strike and Dip of Bed fault onsets.
Horizontal: 1 Inch Equals 80 Feet
LColluvium/Slopewash
Deposits
�5
I_ �_.I G roundwater Table
E
Marine Terrace Deposits
Pedro Formation
M U
F
GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION
PLATE
10 -10'
Qt-1
LSan
8.10
J GEOTECHNICAL.INC. Project Name:
1
Project No:
1
Date:
Newport Banning Ranch 06- 163 -00
July 2011
11
11'
(North)
(South)
120
120
GB -4
(Projected 150')
w 80
of Existing Ground Surface
80 w
LL
LL
Z
_
O40
_
_
_,____ _,___.__._____r__ : _
- -- Q col
__ _______ .-__ ________ ______ ..
__
_._�_.__ ___ 49
F—___._
_
--
w—_ --
_
_ —
�� ._..
_ �_ —_
--
----------------------- _
— s
---- - - - - --
IMSLfO______ _ _ T__________________ C___________________ ______________________��_� - - - -- — __ w = __________ �T __Y___________________________ _ 0 (MSL)
—_._ --
-- - - -_ _
40
- -_
40
EXPLANATION
Qal
Alluvium
Geologic correct, Notes:
9 1. All locations are agxoxima[e.
Q ueried W here Unknown 2. Beddlrg shown in Qsp is largely diagamatic and has
0 40 80 120
Approximate G Scale
been drawn to illustrate the formations general structural
raphic
Horizontal: 1 Inch Equals 80 Feet
Id
Man Made Fill
5
ncture(i.e. Write folds, warping cross beddiigand minor
Strike and Dip of Bed faun onsets.
Q col
ColluviurMlopewash
Deposits
a
Groundwater Table
Qtm
11,1
Marine Terrace Deposits
San Pedro Formation
(AIL
GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION
11 -11' PLATE
GEOTECHNICAL.INC. Project Name:
Project No:
1
Date: 8.11
Newport Banning Ranch 06- 163 -00
July 2011
12
12'
( West)
(East)
12o
120
GB -4
(Projected 150')
80
80
z Qtm
of Existing Ground Surface
z
z I
—
Q Col
Qtm z
__._._____._.._- _
a-- — -
-- -
- - - - --
-- -- __-- - - -_ —_
w
Qsp - -- - -- - - - — -
—� w
Qsp
------
_� — _____```---
=----- - - - - - -- ------
—_ --
- -_ - -- _ \
-40
___—
- —
- -� __— - -_ - - -- — -00
EXPLANATION
Qal Alluviums
N oteS:
Geologic Contact, 1. All locations area mximate.
PP
Q ter led Where Unknown 2. Bedding Qspis the
0 40 80 120
Approximate Graphic Scale
of Man Made Fill
5
been formiaionsgecardhas
beendrawntoillustrate theformationsge ding structural
nto ill
nature (i.e. gentle (olds, warping cross Sending and minor
Strike and Dip of Bed faWt offsets.
Horizontal: 1 Inch Equals 80 Fee[
R ol Colluvium,Slopewash
Deposits
I S
LI
Groundwater Table
IQ —1m] Marine Terrace Deposits
nn San Pedro Formation
pr
tJ!'L�.s V T
PLATE
GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION 12 -12'
GEOTECHNICAL.INC. Project Name:
Project No: Date: 8.12
1
Newport Banning Ranch 06- 163 -00 July 2011
EXPLANATION
me ::
Qal Alluvium L Q xeriec C here , 1. Bedcliatioman in Qsp o xi mate. 0 xi hi 60
Q ueried Where Unknown Z. been dranto Ill is the brdticns Wher and has Approximate Graphic Scale
been drawn en Illustrate the bons general cd Mrral Horizontal: 1 Inch Equals 40 Feet
nature (i.e. grrtle (olds, wargng cross beddingand minor
of Man Made Fill F-1 Strike and Dip of Bed fault offsets.
Q cnl ColluviumKlopewash Groundwater Table
F
Deposits El
Qtm Marine Terrace Deposits IF � PLATE
GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION 13 -13'
4w San Pedro Formation
GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Project Name: Project No: Date: 8.13
Newport Banning Ranch 1 06- 163 -00 July 2011
13
13'
(West)
Property
Line (East)
120
120
Proposed
Existing
Newport Banning
"California Seabreeze"
Ranch Development j
Development
Hilfiker Retaining W all
E
>
(Earth Reinforced with W elded W ire
Mesh Connected to Concrete
Facing Panels)
so
80
Existing
of Ground Surface GB-7
t-u
ou
(Was d
z
_
_
zo
z
o
40
__ -___-
_
Qco l — -__'--
of
z
—
_
-- '-- --- -- '- --
- -'--- --- ---- -'------ -- -- =
- - - - -- - _, - -- -- - - - - --
uu
w
> Lu
w
Qsp ( ?)
Qsp (?)
(M5L) 0 -
- ---------------
— ---------------------------------------------------------T-----------------------
—
0 IMSLJ
-40
-40
EXPLANATION
me ::
Qal Alluvium L Q xeriec C here , 1. Bedcliatioman in Qsp o xi mate. 0 xi hi 60
Q ueried Where Unknown Z. been dranto Ill is the brdticns Wher and has Approximate Graphic Scale
been drawn en Illustrate the bons general cd Mrral Horizontal: 1 Inch Equals 40 Feet
nature (i.e. grrtle (olds, wargng cross beddingand minor
of Man Made Fill F-1 Strike and Dip of Bed fault offsets.
Q cnl ColluviumKlopewash Groundwater Table
F
Deposits El
Qtm Marine Terrace Deposits IF � PLATE
GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION 13 -13'
4w San Pedro Formation
GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Project Name: Project No: Date: 8.13
Newport Banning Ranch 1 06- 163 -00 July 2011
14
14'
( West)
(East)
Property Line
Proposed
Existing
Newport Banning
Existing Ground Surface Ranch Development
"California Seahreeze"
Development
ao
so
Hil Retaining Wall
(Earth Reinforced with Welded W ire
Mesh Connected to Concrete
Facing Panels)
60
of _ _ _ ,___ __ p
F
w
_ _ _ _
w _ _ _. _.
LL
Z _ __ _ ___ -_ _ _ -- _
Z
Z - -
0 40 __ -- — — — — — — —
40 o
ti -----------------------------
- -_ —_- - _
Qsp ——
__ - -_ F
--------------------------
IMSQ o
0(MSD
EXPLANATION
Qal
AIIuNUm
�o
Notes:
GeolOgc Contact, �, All locmio� area oximate.
Queried Where Unknown 3. Bedding stnown Qs
in Qsp is lar�tydtions
0 20 40 60
Approximate Graphic Scale
of
Man Made Fill
a
drawn to enralstr
been drawn to illustrate :he int, on., gmral and! minor
azure set yrrcle folds, warpn9 cross bedding and mirror
Strike and Dip of Bed fault offsets.
Horizontal: 1 Inch Equals 40 Feet
Q col
Colluhum/Slopewash
Deposits
a
Groundwater Table
IQ —t-1
rd sp
Marine Terrace Deposits
San Pedro Formation
MU
GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION 14 -14' PLATE
GEOTECHNICAL,INC. Project Name:
Project No: Date: 8.14
Newport Banning Ranch
1 06- 163 -00 July 2011
S
N 105M W
N IWW
N 95M
0
i
1
N e50o
zQ
G I
z
YA
N8000 f'=
N ]500
N ]000
NOW
N 6000
N 5500
N 5000
N 4500
6 `
1
•C -a,
I
1
EXPLANATION
[12T Strike and Dip of Beds
Horizontal Bedding
z.... Geologic Contact, Approximately Located,
Dotted W here Concealed and Dashed
Where Uncertain
Continuous, Unbroken Pre - Holocene
Age Deposits
Inactive Fault (Black), Showing Strike and Dip
' Fault That Could Not Be Proved Inactive (Red),
y]5
Showing Strike and Dip
Paleo - Channel in Qsp Formation Deposits
Landslide, Showing Movement Direction
L n
Fault Setback Zone
E3
8
A
a
ca
�o
wM
ti
19th STREET
1 _ _�
T -to - a C
� I � � � • _�___ // I I - � ,' � �., � 11.1 1
C DI_ - -•C
D--
r
i o
�C7D pT
Li
CPT -8 l I \ O
fl \
CPT ] n 18th STREET
. TC
2 f' IV
l
• � CPT AA ♦Ile..
1 67
_ :
I✓ "� ?___ CPT 397 \\ / \ �` J (I Il IJ
Qai `\ ��' \� _ ,/ L °` Newport Mesa
- North Segment Faults
G0 -3 ' / \
l I]
, - (iC PT -18
• ' 3 GCPT.19I / a -3 ` (See Plate 10.1 for Enlargement)
-- ycPr
_, v
Il GC T 16 GOT IGCP
• - ♦ 17th STREET
GCPT1 I /� vv0` i
CPT- -97A �� / 1 I /� Y
o6-97 , -
` x
•• � PT- �/
1 C, V <
N_S. - ♦
mil
n
------ TN
I
yI
Q 0
O
N
W est Mesa Faults
Qom
a ii
16th STREET
--
Newport Mesa
a �-
T I Abn
I-
I
/ a I IPe n I � :✓
Q �•� /' I ill /� i � cif ,G' -v i
V 11 / I t• _� /. 1 � \
1
I
_ _ l
`1Q` i
\V A 0VA
Pf �'
r
o
Q SP
♦°
r GE
/
0 k
�6
®A
tl 0sr;
N 8000
N ]500
K ]000
N 6500
egment Faults
to 10.2 for Enlargement)
PRODUCTION
PLACE
yJ
STREET
CPT -10,
CPT -a -97 Leighton & Associates C PT Sounding (1997)
B-1 97 Leighton & Associates Hollow Stem Auger
Boring (1997)
GCPT -1 Goffman, McCormick & Urban, Inc.,
• CPT Sounding (1998)
GB -1 Goffman, McCormick & Urban, Inc.,
♦ Bucket Auger Boring (1998)
B -7 Pacific Soils Engineering Bucket Auger
Boring (1993)
HB -2 Pacific Soils Engineering Hollow Stem
♦ Auger Boring (11993)
C-BI W oodward C lyde C onsultants C PT
A Sounding(1985)
B -B 1 W oodward C lyde C onsultants H ollow
♦ Stem Auger Boring (1985)
TR- 9 Fault Trench, by Goffman, McCormick &
oo' Urban, Inc., This Study, Showing Station "00"
I
[
Fault Trench by Earth Technology (1986)
C -3
Fault Trench by Converse Consultants (1994)
T -3a Fault Trench By EC I, Inc., for Leighton &
Associates, Inc. (1997)
TP -6 Test Pits by Goffman, McCormick &
*�A Urban, Inc. (1998)
Groundwater Monitoring Well Installed
♦ by G eoSyntec (1994)
Hilfiker Wall
Geologic Cross Section Line
N 4500
N 9000
N 3500
N 3000
N ss0°
0 400 800 1200
Approximate Graphic Scale:
One Inch Equals 400 Feet
Contour Interval: 2 feet
N otes:
1. All Locations are Approximate.
2. The Base Map was Obtained from Fuscoe Engineering
N orth
LA
J
I I ,
- Qo
,
q
- N�V'
f 1 ,
,
N � \
J
17� 00
+ V v
T J-97
10
_ , _ - - - �_, ,� + J s
-5 -� _1 ; I ,/ �, —
�� `, tt 00N,\
-i �' �' +,
`\ ; T R
\ + , , -10
; 0 FYI
- -, A-
' `. t(
}
J --
ttt
245 \°
T R,I - -
IN 24 N�5
2 �
C O o
IC "P
T �,vv� ��
v,v,) of w w��� Q ���'�
IN
Al 00
;\ \I
� 51 � I vvx. �
�i v
a I _ ,- '
;� of ` ) +TR \' -
s �,,; -11 T _13
OZ
leoCnnel'.,
82`x,
I \
\
(�vv ivv �,� ya '`v IN
I,
IN IN,
CPT ' i 5� �, v ',,:. L ��
-13 ' {' v al �� .,v
�'�, `' 14b 35 ,570 •�
V I , B_
- -� T R 7
I L• Q
1�� 0 1
I
�� %`, 200
- -
"� -- X T R 6
INN ;
\ X,
Q.0 40' T R -6a
`00 T R -6b �o
50,;
2:
\� TP -6c Q t m
_ T -1i3b
��
-v.0 -4o v
IN
y
_-- `T R -3 '90 ` X a f
X M x
I /
_8 ; �0'-- x; rC S i 1;5 ! = _
$,
T R -3a T -1 -
B a _ � 85 _
�� X
_ ...
;' T R 21 v
T 80
--- - - - - -- —;' 00 - - - -�
3 5
`\ \,
\ - � -� I T R -2 1--1'% - - - -- ;
_
I
' - --
�'
a f '1 V�
_
\ ' /
VIV
7 -;-
— _ -- ^o -- \,
-
IN
oo C01 \
----------- /
�------
-__- ,4
-
EXPLANATION
CPT [12T Strike and Dip of Beds CPT�4�97
Leighton & Associates C PT Sounding (1997) T -a`is Fault Trench by Earth Technology (1986)
B-1-97 97
® Horizontal Bedding
Leighton & Associates Hollow Stem Auger CT -3 0 100 200 300
Fault Trench by Converse Consultants (1994)
Boring (1997) ♦ Approximate Graphic Scale:
Geologic Contact, Approximately Located,
�... � Pp Y GCPT -1
Dotted W here Concealed and Dashed ♦
Where Uncertain
O ne Inch Equals 100 Feet
Goffman, McCormick &Urban, Inc., T -3a Fault Trench By ECI, Inc., for Leighton &
CPT Sounding (1998) ♦ Associates, Inc. (1997) Contour Interval: 2 feet
LContinuous, Unbroken Pre - Holocene GB -1
Age Deposits ♦
Notes:
Goffman, McCormick & Urban, Inc., TP -6 Test Pits by Goffman, McCormick & 1. All Locations are Approximate.
Bucket Auger Boring (1998) �v Urban, Inc. (1998) 2. The Base Map was Obtained from Fuscoe Engineering
��s Inactive Fault (Black), Showing Strike and Dip B -7
Pacific Soils Engineering Bucket Auger Groundwater Monitoring Well Installed
Boring (1993) ♦ by G eoSyntec (1994)
L Fault That Could Not Be Proved Inactive (Red), HB -z
Showing Strike and Dip ♦
Pacific Soils Engineering Hollow Stem Hilfker W all
AugerBoring(1993)
Paleo - Channel in Qsp Formation Deposits C-B'
f
N orth
W oodward Clyde Consultants CPT Geologic Cross Section Line
Sounding(1985) L
B -B'
L Landslide, Showing Movement Direction
♦
W oodward C I de C onsultants H ollow
Stem Au r Borin (1985) PLATE
Auger y g FAULT SETBACK ZONE N E
L Fault Setback Zone T B e
oo'
Fault Trench, by Goffman, McCormick & NEWPORT MESA NORTH SEGMENT
U rban, Inc., This Study, Showing Station "00" GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Project Name: Project No: Date: 9.1
Newport Banning Ranch 06- 163 -00 July 2011
' I o
,
I
•
V < <� 16t '�T1
� -
- -- - 110 _ - - - - -- �
S7
\ , 0
B -3 -__
11 87
T R - O a
-10
55
v --
- -
F
oo`
R --
5 00
g + - -- - --
�,'.90
�,,� +
v _
-� 1
T R -
5� - Q t m
�� - -
�'
:..;
1
00
��•
__ -� ,- -- - - - - -- - -- ; \, T R - 2 3
- �-
o i� , \ •• 100
'� - 9 -100_
� .�
--
-- %
T P�
,
h
17
i e . �
� O
88
'_ — — ✓ ��
T R-1 7 r:
l
8g q
I
T - 7 b „ 1
so�
c- 7 0 ,
z! �
+ + ;85 8A,
tc +
70 �v
EXPLANATION
c P [12T Strike and Dip of Beds cPT
Leighton & Associates C PT Sounding (1997) r -`is Fault Trench by Earth Technology (1986)
BB1 67
® Horizontal Bedding
L
Leighton & Associates Hollow Stem Auger CT -3 0 100 200 300
Fault Trench by Converse Consultants (1994)
Boring(1997) Approximate Graphic Scale:
Geologic Contact, Approximately Located,
�... � Pp Y GcPT -,
Dotted Where Concealed and Dashed ♦
Where Uncertain
O ne Inch Equals 100 Feet
Goffman, McCormick &Urban, Inc., T -3a Fault Trench By ECI, Inc., for Leighton &
CPT Sounding (1998) ♦ Associates, Inc. (1997) Contour Interval: 2 feet
LContinuous, Unbroken Pre - Holocene GB -1
Age Deposits ♦
Notes:
Goffman, McCormick & Urban, Inc., TP -6 Test Pits by Goffman, McCormick & 1. All Locations are Approximate.
Bucket Auger Boring (1998) �v Urban, Inc. (1998) 2. The Base Map was Obtained from Fuscoe Engineering
��s Inactive Fault (Black), Showing Strike and Dip B -7
Pacific Soils Engineering Bucket Auger Groundwater Monitoring Well Installed
Boring (1993) ♦ by G eoSyntec (1994)
L Fault That Could Not Be Proved Inactive (Red), HB -2
Showing Strike and Dip ♦
Pacific Soils Engineering Hollow Stem Hilfker W all
Auger Boring (1993)
Paleo - Channel in Qsp Formation Deposits C -B1
f
N orth
W oodward Clyde Consultants CPT Geologic Cross Section Line
Sounding(1985)
B -e 1
L Landslide, Showing Movement Direction
♦
W oodward C I de C onsultants H ollow
Stem Au r Boring (985) PLATE
Auger y g FAULT SETBACK ZONE N E
L Fault Setback Zone TB- e
oo'
Fault Trench, by Goffman, McCormick & NEWPORT MESA SOUTH SEGMENT
U rban, Inc., This Study, Showing Station "00” GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Project Name: Project No: Date: 9.2
Newport Banning Ranch 06- 163 -00 July 2011
"Benching Shall Be Required When Natural Slopes
are Equal to or Exceed 6:1 or When Recommended Fill Slope –,,
by the Geotechnical Engineer/Geologist
`v Property
Line
V Setback Natural I
Natural Ground
o Per Grading
^+ Code
LL�
'
2 -Feet 4- Feet(Typical)
Minimum %,
Keyway Tl
(TypicaypicaQ Competent Earth
Remove Unsuitable Material
i
et •,10
Grade for She Flow or Provide Paved Drain ••• ,
Written Permission Must Be Obtained for -Foot Minimum
Any Grading on Adjacent Property (Keyway Inclined 2% Into Slope)
BENCHED FILL OVER NATURAL
Property ALTERNATE 2
Line
Setback
Par Grading
Code Fill Slope
Compacted Back611 j,••••'•• Finish Fill Slope
Remove Unsuitable Material
Keyway
Natural Ground 4-Feet (Typical) Com P� M
.___.. 2 -Feet // /.. Earth
Minimum to-
i-� —^ / (FYpic'ao
Cut Slope to be
Constructed Prior to -. Keyway
Placement of Fill
Foot Minimum or Stability Equivalent Per
Soils Engineer Recommendations
( Keyvay Inclined 2% Into Slope)
BENCHED FILL OVER CUT
TYPICAL BENCHING
PLATE
AND KEYWAY
10
Project Name:
Project No:
Date:
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
Newport Banning Ranch
1 06- 163 -00
July 2011
15 Feet Minimum
Planned Grade ... ..
- - 4 -Inch Diameter
Non-Perforated Outlet Pipe
(See Typical Backdrain Type Subdrain)
15 Feet Minimum
N otes:
1. All Buttress or Stabilization Dimensions to be Determined by Geotechnical Engineer /Geologist.
2. Keyway W idth and Depth to be per Recommendations of Soils Engineer and Geologist
3. Natural Solpe Surface Removed to be Reconstructed as a Compacted Fill Slope.
4. Any 'Tailing" Deposited on the N atural Slope Surface Downhill from the Keyway are to be Removed.
5. All Dimensions and Locations are Approximate.
6. Drawingis not to Scale.
TYPICAL BUTTRESS OR PLATE
■V�ll�� ■VI STABILIZATION FILL
GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Project Name: Project No: Date: 1 1
Newport Banning Ranch 1 06- 163 -00 July 2011
SCENARIO 1
--------------------- - --
m m
//l j�TljrTj7T /' Fwt Maxmum
rrTJrrT Feu
Bedrock or / Trrjjjj jr
itae ls i
Su bl M ta TJ /rl
Process, Moisture Condition and Compact a er
Upper 12 Inches if Necessary
(As Determined by Soils Engineer Based
on Actual Field Conditions)
SCENARIO 2
---------------- - - - - -- - - - - --
---------------------- --
m m
j % %%%
Bedrock or
O verexcavate Lot to Provide a Minimum rT %jrTr %%l
Suitable Materials
Fill Thickness of at LeastS Feet
Across the Entire Lot
SCENARIO 3
M m
TrrTI /r�
_-----------
_ .i1:5 Feer. `Fi(I
2%Slope —� _ _ _
r
Over excavate Transition to a Depth of H/3 Suitable M
ateri srTrrj��jrr,JjT�IrTJj
(5 Feet Minimum, 10 Feet Maximum)
W'Qw
TYPICAL DETAIL
OVER - EXCAVATION OF TRANSITION
PLATE
LOTS
GEOTECHNICAL.INC.
12
Project Name:
Project No:
Date:
N ewport Banning Ranch
06- 163 -00
July 2011
10 Feet Minimum
.15 Feet Minimum < 15 Feet Minimum
3 Feet
Minimum
Typical Row of Oversize
Rock Fragments
N otes:
1. All Dimensions and Locations are Approximate. 0 5 10 15
2. Drawing is not to scale.
Approximate Graphic Scale:
1 Inch Equals 70 Feet
RECOMMENDED PLACEMENT METHOD PLATE
FOR OVERSIZE ROCK OR CONCRETE
FrJCMU
13
GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Project Name: Project No: Date:
Newport Banning Ranch 1 06- 163 -00 July2011
9 C ubic Feet of Filter Material
Per Lineal Foot of Pipe
(See N ote 1)
G rade of T r ibutary D rainage C ourses
After Removal of Low - Density Alluvium
3 Feet
6- Inches
N.
3 Feet 4 or 6 -Inch Perforated Pipe
(Perforations Towards Bottom)
PIPE TO MEET COUNTY OF ORANGE REQUIREMENTS
ABS PIPE: ASTM D2751, SDR 35 OR ASTM D1527, Schedule 40
PVC PIPE: ASTM D3034, SDR 35 or ASTM D1785, Schedule 40
N otes:
1. Filter Material to Conform to Gradation Specifications per 0 EMA Standard
Plan No. 1323 or an Approved Equal Consisting of Filter Fabric and Crushed Rock.
2. See Typical Canyon Bottom Subdrain Detail for Pipe Specification.
3. All Dimensions and Locations are Approximate.
4. Drawing is not to Scale.
p PLATE
(;Nw TYPICAL CANYON BOTTOM DETAIL
14
GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Project Name: Project No: Date:
Newport Banning Ranch 06- 163 -00 July 2011
I
Temporary Fill Surface
Plan G rade
y
2 %Minimum _..
F " ,
_. 4 -Inch Diameter'
N on- Perforated 0 utlet Pipe
4 Cubic Feet of Filter Material Per
1 -Foot Lineal Foot of Pipe _
Minimum C over (See Note 1)
Backfill W ith Select Native
Soil Free of Large Rocks
1Foot 4 -Inch Non - Perforated Minimum 6- Inches of Filter
Outlet Pipe Material Surrounding 4-Inch
Perforated Plastic Pipe
(Perforations toward Bottom)
OUTLET PIPE COLLECTOR SYSTEM
No Scale No Scale
N otes:
1. Filter Material to Conform to Gradation Specifications per 0 EMA Standard
Plan No. 1323 or an Approved Equal Consisting of Filter Fabric and Crushed Rock.
2. See Typical Canyon Bottom Subdrain Detail for Pipe Specification.
3. All Dimensions and Locations are Approximate.
4. Drawing is not to Scale.
(MU TYPICAL BACKDRAIN TYPE SUBDRAIN PLATE
GEOTECHNICAL.INC. Project Name: Project No: Date: 15
1
Newport Banning Ranch 06- 163 -00 July 2011
Plan Grade
8 -Inch Diameter Riser
Ground Surface After Minimum 12R3A- F. ��• ' i
Removal of Low - Density Soil Filter Material
^F
• - ... ------- - --`
-- - -- -7,
—_ —__
Canyon Bottom Subdrain W ith ` - -' -�
gft.3/L.F. Filter Material
N otes;
1. Filter Material to Conform to Gradation Specifications per 0 EMA Standard
Plan No. 1323 or an Approved Equal Consisting of Filter Fabric and Crushed Rock.
2. See Tygcal Canyon Bottom Subdrain Detail for Pipe Specification.
3. All Dimensions and Locations are Approximate.
4. Drawing is not to Scale.
OluTYPICAL DEW ATERING SUMP PLATE
16
GEOTECHNICAL.INC. Project Name: Project No: Date:
1 of c
1
Newport Banning Ranch 06- 163 -00 July 2011