The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About00 - Public CommentsBrown, Leilani From: Jacquie Sullivan pacquie @libertystar.net] Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 1:51 PM To: Brown, Leilani Subject: In God We Trust—America, Inc. Dear LeiLani, Will you please distribute this email to your elected officials? Thank You. In God We Trust — America, Inc. Our Mission To Promote Patriotism By Encouraging Elected Officials to "Vote Yes" To Legally Display Our Congressionally Approved National Motto "In God We Trust„ In Every City, County Chamber and State Capitol In America To the City of Newport Beach: Dear Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers, This letter is to inform you that John Carr, the Southern California Representative for.In God lye Trust America, Inc, will be attending your meeting on Tuesday, March 12, 2012. During the public comment portion of your meeting, John will make a brief presentation, to encourage you vote in favor of displaying our National Motto, In God We Trust, in your City Council Chamber. He will make clear the legality of this campaign and as a fellow resident of Orange County, he will enlighten you that at this time, Orange County is the leading county in California, and the country, having the greatest number of cities now displaying In God We Trust. John will ask this issue to be put on your city council agenda, and ask you to "Vote Yes" to proudly and prominently display our National Motto, In God We Trust, in your City Council Chamber at City Hall. I welcome you to call me with questions or concerns you might have on this important request. Thank you in advance, ,A o Bakersfield City Councilmember In Cod We T rust — America, Inc. Founder/ President Nome /Office /Cell: 661- 834 -4943 Jacquie iDLibertyStar.net In Gad We Tract — America, Ltc. P.O. BOX 11715 `s Bakersfield . CA 93389 ° 661- 834 -4943 Ernail: iacuuiesullivanoineodwe trust- america.org; website: www.ineodwetrust- amcriELM A non -profit 501 c3 educational corporation ID# 2624857 In God We Trust — America, Inc. "YES VOTE" COUNTIES AND CITIES ACROSS AMERICA THAT APPROVED DISPLAY OF 012R NATIONAL MOTTO "IN GOD WE TRUST" IN THEIR CHAMBERS. 277 — Total # of "Yes Vote" counties and cities across AM no State ®fAlabaina State Countv or Citv Countv Date Anaroved 1 Alabama Heflin Cleburne 10/11/2011 2 Alabama Hoover Jefferson 4/18/2011 Alabama "Yes Vote" Counties and Cities - 2 State ®fArkansas State Countv or Citv County Dade Avvroved 1 Arkansas Baxter County Supervisors Baxter 9/7/2010 2 Arkansas Alpena Boone 9/6/2010 3 Arkansas Ash Flat Sharp 5/17/2010 4 Arkansas Avoca Benton 5/31/2010 5 Arkansas Bald Knob White 10/4/2010 6 Arkansas Bay Craighead 8/9/2010 7 Arkansas Bella Vista Benton 2/28/2011 8 Arkansas Blytheville Mississippi 10/20/2009 9 Arkansas Bono Craighead 8/17/2010 10 Arkansas Brookland Craighead 9/14/2010 11 Arkansas Burdette Mississippi 10/26/2009 12 Arkansas Caddo Valley Clark 8/19/2010 13 Arkansas Calico Rock Izard 9/13/2010 14 Arkansas Caraway Craighead 8/12/2010 15 Arkansas Cave City Sharp 9/28/2010 16 Arkansas Cherokee Village Sharp & Fulton 9/1/2010 17 Arkansas Clarendon Monroe 9/7/2010 18 Arkansas Clinton Van Buren 9/14/2010 19 Arkansas Crossett Ashely 2000 20 Arkansas Dardanelle Yell 10/4/2010 21 Arkansas DeQueen Sevier 9/21/2010 22 Arkansas Diamond City Boone 10/18/2010 Sunday, March 11, 2012 �` k ;. y°ij Page 1 of 10 23 Arkansas El Dorado Union 1991 24 Arkansas Etowah Mississippi 9/21/2010 25 Arkansas Fairfield Bay Van Buren 1995 26 Arkansas Felthensal Union 4/12/2011 27 Arkansas Gosnell Mississippi 11/10/2009 28 Arkansas Greenwood Sebastian 2001 29 Arkansas Hampton Calhoun 9/13/2010 30 Arkansas Hardy Sharp 9/7/2010 31 Arkansas Harrell Calhoun 8/17/2010 32 Arkansas Harrisburg Pointsett 5/10 /2011 33 Arkansas Hazen Prairie 9/16/2010 34 Arkansas Higginson White 6/7/2010 35 Arkansas Highland Sharp 9/15/2010 36 Arkansas Horatio Sevier 11/1/2010 37 Arkansas Horseshoe Bend lzard 5/19/2010 38 Arkansas Hot Springs Garland 5/4/2011 39 Arkansas Hoxie Lawrence 10/12/2010 40 Arkansas Huntsville Madison 9/15/2010 41 Arkansas Jacksonport Jackson 7/20/2010 42 Arkansas Jasper Newton 1993 43 Arkansas Keiser Mississippi 8/23/2010 44 Arkansas Lake City Craighead 8/16/2010 45 Arkansas Leachville Mississippi 10/11/2010 46 Arkansas Lead Hill Boone 10/14/2010 47 Arkansas Letona White 7/6/2010 48 Arkansas Little Flock Benton 10/11/2010 49 Arkansas Lowell Benton 9/21/2010 50 Arkansas Mineral Springs Howard 11/9/2010 Ti— Arkansas Morrilton Conway 9/13/2010 52 Arkansas Mountain Home Baxter 8/17/2010 53 Arkansas Mountain View Stone 9/7/2010 54 Arkansas Norfork Baxter 9/21/2010 55 Arkansas Ola Yell 10/11/2010 56 Arkansas Osceola Mississippi 11/16/2009 57 Arkansas Palestine St. Francis 9/14/2010 58 Arkansas Pineville Izard 8/24/2010 59 Arkansas Plumerville Conway 12/13/2010 60 Arkansas Rison Cleveland 10/12/2010 - Sunday, March 11, 2012 , , _ ` ,k Page3 of 10 61 Arkansas Rockport Flot Spring 9/14/2010 62 Arkansas Rose Bud White 11/08/2010 63 Arkansas Russelville Pope 9/16/2010 64 Arkansas Salesville Baxter 10/11/2010 65 Arkansas Searcy White 8/10/2010 66 Arkansas Shirley Van Buren 11/8/2010 67 Arkansas Strawberry Lawrence 4/15/2011 68 Arkansas Stuttgart Arkansas 9/7/2010 69 Arkansas Trumann Poinsett 2/08/2011 70 Arkansas Tull Grant 8/2/2010 71 Arkansas Tyronza Poinsett 10/12/2010 72 Arkansas Waldenburg Poinsett 10/19/2010 73 Arkansas Waldron Scott 8/10/2010 74 Arkansas Weiner Poinsett 9/14/2010 75 Arkansas Western Grove Newton 8/2/2010 1761 Arkansas Wrightsville Pulaski 10/5/2010 Arkansas "Yes Vote" Counties and Cities - 76 State of California State a G:Rrt:AU PIP[91C County or City County Date Approved 1 California Imperial County Supervisors Imperial 10/20/2009 2 California Kern County Supervisors Kern 2/15/2011 3 California San Bernardino Co. Supervisors San Bernardino 12/14/2010 4 California Adelanto San Bernardino 10/8/2008 5 California Anderson Shasta 10/1/2005 6 California Artesia Los Angeles 2/13/2006 7 California Arvin Kern 7/12/2005 8 California Auburn Placer 10/24/2011 9 California Bakersfield Kern 2/20/2002 10 California Barstow San Bernardino 1/5/2009 11 California Biggs Butte 5/17/2010 12 California Brawley Imperial 7/21/2009 13 California Brea Orange 10/20/2009 14 California Buena Park Orange 2/24/2009 15 California California City Kern 7/19/2005 16 California Carson Los Angeles 4/4/2006 17 California Chino San Bernardino May -2009 Sunday, March 11, 2012 C, Page 3 of 10 18 California Chino Hills San Bernardino 9/14/2010 19 California Colfax Placer 1/12/2011 20 California Colton San Bernardino 1/04/2011 21 California Compton Los Angeles 7/10/2007 22 California Corning Tehama 1/11/2011 23 California Costa Mesa Orange 11/17/2009 24 California Crescent City Del Norte 1/18/2011 25 California Cypress Orange 2/11/2008 26 California Delano Kern 7/15/2002 27 California Doris Siskiyou 10/20/2008 28 California Eastvale Riverside 2/09/2011 29 California El Cajon Imperial 13/13/2011 30 California El Centro Imperial 9/4/2008 31 California Fortuna Humboldt 10/5/2009 32 California Fountain Valley Orange 9/16/2008 33 California Fowler Fresno 8/29/2011 34 California Grand Terrace San Bernardino 1/24/2012 35 California Gridley Butte 12/15/2008 36 California Hawthorne Los Angeles 2/28/2006 37 California Highland San Bernardino 9/9/2008 38 California Holtville Imperial 7/12/2010 39 California Hughson Stanislaus 12/11/2006 40 California Huntington Beach Orange 4/7/2008 41 California Huron Fresno 5/4/2011 42 California Imperial Imperial 9/17/2008 43 California Irwindale Los Angeles 6/9/2010 44 California Kerman Fresno 2/21/2007 45 California Lake Forrest Orange 1/18/2011 46 California Lancaster Los Angeles 5/13/2008 47 California Lathrop San Joaquin 11/3/2009 48 California Lemoore Kings 9/16/2008 49 California Lodi San Joaquin 4/5/2006 50 California Lompoc Santa Barbara 10/7/2008 51 California Los Alamitos Orange 6/20/2008 52 California Lynwood Los Angeles 3/16/2010 53 California Maricopa Kern 7/27/2005 54 California McFarland Kern 6/9/2005 55 California Mission Viejo Orange 3/17/2008 Sunday, March 11, 2012 ! Page 4 of 10 56 California Moreno Valley Riverside 9/13/2011 57 California Norco Riverside 12/15/2010 58 California Oakley Contra Costa 7/9/2007 59 California Oceanside San Diego 10/26/2002 60 California Ontario San Bernardino 5/31 /2010 61 California Orange Cove Fresno 4/8/2009 62 California Paso Robles San Luis Obispo 7/5/2006 63 California Perris Riverside 3/8/2011 64 California Plymouth Amador 2/9/2006 65 California Port Hueneme Ventura 11/21/2011 66 California Porterville Tulare 9/3/2002 67 California Rancho Santa Margarita Orange 11/12/2008 68 California Reedley Fresno 2/24/2009 69 California Ridgecrest Kern 4/2/2005 70 California Rio Del Humboldt 11/03/2009 71 California San Clemente Orange 3/18/2008 72 California Sanger Fresno 5/7/2011 73 California Santa Clarita Los Angeles 5/12/2009 74 California Seal Beach Orange 2/23/2009 75 California Selma Fresno 11/3/2008 76 California Shafter Kern 7/19/2005 77 California Shasta Lake Shasta 7/21/2009 78 California Soledad Monterey 5/5/2010 79 California Sonora Tuolumne 8/6/2007 80 California Taft Kern 3/4/2003 81 California Tehachapi Kern 4/I/2002 82 California Tulare Tulare 2/17/2009 83 California Turlock Stanislaus 12/8/2009 84 California Tustin Orange 5/20/2008 85 California Victorville San Bernardino 7/18/2006 86 California Villa Park Orange 11/4/2008 87 California Wasco Kern 4/16/2002 88 California Waterford Stanislaus 10 /7/2010 89 California Weed Siskiyou 12/11/2008 90 California Westminster Orange 7/11/2007 91 California Yorba Linda Orange 9/16/2008 92 California Yucaipa San Bernardino 2/14/2011 Sunday, March 11., 2012 G :;` Page 5 of 10 Culifornia "Yes Vote" Counties and Cities - 92 Striate of Colorado State Countv or Citv Countv Date Approved 1 Colorado Weld County Commissioners Weld 1/23/2012 2 1 Colorado Evans Weld 2/27/2012 Colorado "Yes Vote" Counties and Cities - 2 State of Florida >-4 State Countv or Citv Countv Date Approved 1 Florida State Motto: "In God We Trust" Capitol: Tallahassee 7/1/2006 2 Florida Kissimmee Osceola 8/24/2010 Florida "Yes Vote" Counties and Cities - 2 Striate of Georgia State Countv or Citv Countv Date Approved I Georgia Berrian County Supervisors Berrian 10/12/2010 Georgia Cook County Supervisors Cook 12/06/2010 3 Georgia Crisp County Supervisors Crisp 1/11 /2011 4 Georgia Tift County Supervisors Tift 11/08/2010 5 Georgia Turner County Supervisors Turner 11/02/2010 6 Georgia Lenox Cook 10/11/2010 7 Georgia Omega Tift 10/05/2010 8 Georgia Sycamore Turner 9/9/2010 9 Georgia Tifton Tift 9/13 /2010 10 Georgia Tyty Tift 9/7/2010 Georgia "Yes Vote" Counties and Cities - 10 State of Michigan State Countv or Nliclrigan "Yes Vote" Counties and Cities - 1 6 Sunday, March 11, 2012 Y Date Page 6 of 10 State ®f Minnesota State Countv or Minnesota "Yes Vote" Counties and Cities - 1 State ofA7issouri State Countv Bate County or ON Cotinty Date ADDYOved 1 Missouri Camden County Commissioners Camden 3/21/2011 2 Missouri Christian County Commissioners Christian 8/15 /2011 3 Missouri Cole County Commissioners Cole 8/10/2011 4 Missouri Crawford County Commissioners Crawford 5 Missouri Dallas County Commissioners Dallas 11/1/2011 6 Missouri Greene County Commissioners Greene 6/20/2011 7 Missouri Jasper County Commissioners Jasper 3/22/2011 8 Missouri Laclede County Commissioners Laclede 9 Missouri Lawrence County Commissioners Lawrence 10 Missouri McDonald County Commissioners McDonald I 1 Missouri Scott County Commissioners Scott 2002 12 Missouri Stone County Commissioners Stone 7/12/2011 l3 Missouri Taney County Commissioners Taney 3/28/2011 14 Missouri Texas County Commissioners Texas 3/23/2011 15 Missouri Webster County Commissioners Webster 16 Missouri Wright County Commissioners Wright 3/21/2011 17 Missouri Adrian Bates 5/9/2011 18 Missouri Anderson McDonald 4/19/2011 19 Missouri Ash Grove Greene 4/4/2011 20 Missouri Aurora Lawrence 8/23/2011 21 Missouri Billings Christian 4/14/2011 22 Missouri Bolivar Municipal Court Poll: 2/10/2011 23 Missouri Branson Taney 1/26/2011 24 Missouri Buffalo Dallas 2/28/2011 25 Missouri Butler Bates 4/19/2011 26 Missouri Cabool Texas 1960 27 Missouri Clever Christian 4/26/2011 28 Missouri Crane Stone Sunday, March 11, 2012 ; , x Page 7 of 10 29 Missouri Fair Grove Greene 7/12/2011 30 Missouri Galena Stone 9/6/2011 31 Missouri Hartsville Wright 5/9/2011 32 Missouri Hermitage Hickory 9/13/2011 33 Missouri Humansville Polk 5/24/2011 34 Missouri Jefferson City Cole 6/6/2011 35 Missouri Joplin Jasper /Newton 36 Missouri Lebanon Laclede 7/13/2009 37 Missouri Licking Texas 7/12/2011 38 Missouri Mansfield Wright 3/31/2011 39 Missouri Marble Hill Bollinger 6/16/2011 40 Missouri Marshfield Webster 2/10/2011 41 Missouri Monett Barry 3/21/2011 42 Missouri Mountain Grove Wright 4/19/2011 43 Missouri Osceola St. Clair 5/24/2011 44 Missouri Ozark Christian 6/20/2011 45 Missouri Republic Christian /Greene 7/25/2011 46 Missouri Salem Dent 4/4/2011 47 Missouri Sikeston Scott/New Madrid 2008 48 Missouri Springfield Greene 49 Missouri Stockton Cedar 6/27/2011 50 Missouri Strafford Greene 8/15/2011 51 Missouri Sullivan Franklin /Crawford 10/18/2011 52 Missouri West Plains Howell 4/11/2011 Missouri "Yes Vote" Counties and Cities - 52 Striate of Oklahoma State ZM County or City County Date Approver! 1 Oklahoma Cleveland County Commissioners Cleveland 5/31 /2011 2 Oklahoma Ottawa County Commissioners Ottawa 5/16/2011 3 Oklahoma Pittsburg County Commissioners Pittsburg 4/11/2011 4 Oklahoma Chouteau Mayes 7/13/2009 5 Oklahoma McAlester Pittsburg 5/24/2011 6 Oklahoma Miami Ottawa 6/6/2011 7 Oklahoma Norman Cleveland 8 Oklahoma Oaks Delaware 7/13/2009 9 Oklahoma Ottawa Blue Jacket 6/8/2009 Sunday, March 11, 2012 Page 8 of 10 1101 Oklahoma I Pittsburg I Pittsburg 1 4/11/2011 11 Oklahoma Slaughterville Cleveland 9/21/2010 Oklahoma "Yes Vote" Counties and Cities - 11 State of Pennsylvania State County or City County Date Approved �1 Pennsvlvania I Mountville Borou. .gh I Lancaster 1 3/28/2011 r CnnsVNUl7u[ -ies vurc -- �orrrures unn cues - r State of Texas State County or ON County Date Avvroved 1 Texas Rusk County Commissioners Rusk 8/18/2011 2 Texas Smith County Commissioners Smith 7/5/2011 3 Texas Upshur County Commissioners Upshur 10/31/2011 4 Texas Wood County Commissioners Wood 9/16/2011 5 "Texas Alba Wood 11/15/2011 6 Texas Arp Smith 11/14/2011 7 Texas Breckenridge Stephens 10/5/2009 8 Texas Bullard Smith /Cherokee 10/4/2011 9 Texas Chandler Henderson 10/11/2011 10 Texas Gilmer Upshur 2/7/2012 11 Texas Gladewater Gregg / Uphhur 8/26/2011 12 Texas Hawkins Wood 11/21/2011 13 Texas Hawley Jones 14 Texas Henderson Rusk 6/28/2011 15 Texas Lindale Smith 10/18/2011 16 Texas Mineola Wood 2/27/2012 17 Texas Mt. Enterprise Rusk 9/27/2011 18 Texas New London Rusk 2/13/2012 19 Texas Noonday Smith 10/27/2011 20 Texas Overton Rusk 2/16/2012 21 Texas Quitman Wood 10/21/2011 22 Texas Troup Smith 9/27/2011 23 Texas Tyler Smith 10/26/2011 24 Texas White Oak Gregg 10/17/2011 25 Texas Whitehouse Smith 9/27/2011 Sunday, March 11,2012 . Page of 10 26 Texas Winona Smith 9/2072011 1271 Texas Yantis Wood 11/21/2011 Texas "Yes Vote" Counties and Cities - 27 277 "Yes Vote" Counties and Cities acrossAM �!l P D Sunday, March 11, 2012 "_ Page 10 of 10 Comments on March 13, 2012 City Council Agenda Items Comments by: Jim Mosher ( limmosher(o)yahoo.com ), 2210 Private Road, Newport Beach 92660 Item 4. Peninsula Point Alley Replacement G In the list of bids received (near the beginning of the Discussion on page 2) bid Number 7 for $1,293,293 from EBS General Engineering Inc appears to be substantially lower than the bid accepted. Is this a misprint for $2,293,293? Or was there some other reason for rejecting it? o Since the description of the work to be performed is so sketchy, it would be helpful if the Discussion mentioned the Request for Proposal (RFP) which the bids are in response to or included a copy of the draft contract indicating the scope of services to be performed. G At the March 8, 2012 meeting of the Coastal /Bay Water Quality Citizens Advisory Committee; the committee and the public heard a presentation from Fuscoe Engineering describing the environmental advantages of adding permeable features to the concrete drainage culverts that typically run down the middles of alleys. Mayor Gardner and Council Member Henn both questioned why such features are not being incorporated into the City's many routine renovation projects. Were such features part of this RFP? If not, could they be added? Would doing so qualify for water quality related grants? Item 5. Streetlight Improvement Project As with the previous item, it would be helpful if the Discussion referenced the RFP and /or the draft contract so the public would be better informed about the scope of services being contracted for. Does this upgrading of the existing lighting and circuitry involve adding new above ground utility boxes to underground areas? If so, could such boxes be undergrounded? If not, why not? Item 7. Bulkhead and Seawall Repairs As best I can understand the Discussion, to take advantage of the favorable contracting environment staff is recommending adding 25% to the bid amount to pay for additional work which will be requested but which was not mentioned in the RFP. Has the contractor agreed to this? Is the additional work included in the "scope of services "? If not, it seems poor policy to expect work to be performed that is not mentioned in the contract. Item 8. Planning Commission Agenda Report for March 8, 2012 C Regarding the Study Session on the Newport Banning Ranch DEIR, it might be noted that due to the late arrival of one of the Planning Commissioners, and the Commission's wish to allow time for public comment before the end of the meeting, there was no opportunity for the commissioners to ask questions of the presenters. Also, despite what March 13, 2012 Council Meeting comments by Jim Mosher Page 2 of 2 is reported here, and a notice that appeared in the Daily Pilot on March 10"', I do not recall any announcement at this Study Session to the effect that a public hearing on the project would be held before the Commission at its March 22, 2012 regular meeting. Item 9. General Plan Annual Status Report The staff report mentions that the Status Report was reviewed by the Planning Commission on February 23, 2012, but fails to mention that at that meeting two members of the public questioned the claim on page 4 (handwritten page 8) under General Plan Implementation Task 8 that "The exploration of the acquisition of Banning Ranch (as permanent open space) is continual." The two members of the public suggested the City had done nothing to "support active pursuit' of this goal in calendar year 2011. Although staff was unable to provide any examples of pursuit or support of the activities called for in LU 6.3.2, the statement that there was "continual" activity during 2011 remains unaltered. Item 10. Water and Wastewater Multi- Hazard Mitigation Plan Update C The heading "A. No Fiscal Impact' under "Funding Requirements" on the first page of the staff report suggests there may be additional funding requirements ( "B," etc.) that may have been inadvertently omitted. Item 11. Appointments to the Aviation Committee G It might be useful to extend the deadline for applications to a date after the next meeting of the Aviation Committee (March 26) so that the search for applicants could be announced there. Item 14. Newport Beach Country Club — Golf Realty Fund Government Code Section 65869 (repeated in CNB Municipal Code 15.45.090), says that until a city obtains certification of its local coastal program, development agreements are not applicable to land in the Coastal Zone unless approved by formal action of the California Coastal Commission. Who will be taking the lead to see that this Development Agreement (and that with the Newport Beach Country Club, Inc. applicant) will be reviewed and approved by the Coastal Commission, and who will be paying the costs? Item 16. Balboa and Corona del Mar Fire Rings The staff report does not make clear that of the 19 people who spoke against fire rings at the February 7, 2012 Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission meeting, all appeared to be from Corona del Mar. I do not recalling anyone speaking about or objecting to the fire rings near the Balboa Pier. Comments on March 13, 2012 City Council Agenda Items Comments by: Jim Mosher ( iimmosher(a)yahoo.com ), 2210 Private Road, Newport Beach 92660 Item 4. Peninsula Point Alley Replacement o In the list of bids received (near the beginning of the Discussion on page 2) bid Number 7 for $1,293,293 from EBS General Engineering Inc appears to be substantially lower than the bid accepted. Is this a misprint for $2,293,293? Or was there some other reason for rejecting it? C Since the description of the work to be performed is so sketchy, it would be helpful if the Discussion mentioned the Request for Proposal (RFP) which the bids are in response to or included a copy of the draft contract indicating the scope of services to be performed. C At the March 8, 2012 meeting of the Coastal /Bay Water Quality Citizens Advisory Committee, the committee and the public heard a presentation from Fuscoe Engineering describing the environmental advantages of adding permeable features to the concrete drainage culverts that typically run down the middles of alleys. Mayor Gardner and Council Member Henn both questioned why such features are not being incorporated into the City's many routine renovation projects. Were such features part of this RFP? If not, could they be added? Would doing so qualify for water quality related grants? Item 5. Streetlight Improvement Project G As with the previous item, it would be helpful if the Discussion referenced the RFP and /or the draft contract so the public would be better informed about the scope of services being contracted for. C Does this upgrading of the existing lighting and circuitry involve adding new above ground utility boxes to underground areas? If so, could such boxes be undergrounded? If not, why not? Item 7. Bulkhead and Seawall Repairs U As best I can understand the Discussion, to take advantage of the favorable contracting environment staff is recommending adding 25% to the bid amount to pay for additional work which will be requested but which was not mentioned in the RFP. Has the contractor agreed to this? Is the additional work included in the "scope of services "? If not, it seems poor policy to expect work to be performed that is not mentioned in the contract. Item 8. Planning Commission Agenda Report for March 8, 2012 C Regarding the Study Session on the Newport Banning Ranch DEIR, it might be noted that due to the late arrival of one of the Planning Commissioners, and the Commission's wish to allow time for public comment before the end of the meeting, there was no opportunity for the commissioners to ask questions of the presenters. Also, despite what March 13, 2012 Council Meeting comments by Jim Mosher Page 2 of 2 is reported here, and a notice that appeared in the Daily Pilot on March 10`h, I do not recall any announcement at this Study Session to the effect that a public hearing on the project would be held before the Commission at its March 22, 2012 regular meeting. Item 9. General Plan Annual Status Report C The staff report mentions that the Status Report was reviewed by the Planning Commission on February 23, 2012, but fails to mention that at that meeting two members of the public questioned the claim on page 4 (handwritten page 8) under General Plan Implementation Task 8 that "The exploration of the acquisition of Banning Ranch [as permanent open space] is continual." The two members of the public suggested the City had done nothing to "support active pursuit" of this goal in calendar year 2011. Although staff was unable to provide any examples of pursuit or support of the activities called for in LU 6.3.2, the statement that there was "continual" activity during 2011 remains unaltered. Item 10. Water and Wastewater Multi- Hazard Mitigation Plan Update o The heading "A. No Fiscal Impact"' under "Funding Requirements" on the first page of the staff report suggests there may be additional funding requirements ( "B," etc.) that may have been inadvertently omitted. Item 11. Appointments to the Aviation Committee It might be useful to extend the deadline for applications to a date after the next meeting of the Aviation Committee (March 26) so that the search for applicants could be announced there. Item 14. Newport Beach Country Club — Golf Realty Fund Government Code Section 65869 (repeated in CNB Municipal Code 15.45.090), says that until a city obtains certification of its local coastal program, development agreements are not applicable to land in the Coastal Zone unless approved by formal action of the California Coastal Commission. Who will be taking the lead to see that this Development Agreement (and that with the Newport Beach Country Club, Inc. applicant) will be reviewed and approved by the Coastal Commission, and who will be paying the costs? Item 16. Balboa and Corona del Mar Fire Rings The staff report does not make clear that of the 19 people who spoke against fire rings at the February 7, 2012 Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission meeting, all appeared to be from Corona del Mar. I do not recalling anyone speaking about or objecting to the fire rings near the Balboa Pier. Harris, Lillian From: Jim Mosher Uimmosher @yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 8:00 PM To: Houston, Rob Cc: City Clerk's Office Subject: Minor typos in March 13, 2012 City Council Resolutions and Ordinances Categories: Lillian, Leilani The following are some typos noticed in the resolutions and ordinances being proposed for consideration at the City Council meeting on March 13, 2012. None probably have any substantive effective. Agenda Item 3: Resolution 2012 -23 (Stop Sign on Hazel Drive) "NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Newport Beach, hereby designates..." would be more "normal" and grammatical if it read "NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Newport Beach hereby designates.." Agenda Item 14: Newport Beach Country Club - Golf Realty Fund Ordinance No. 2012 -2 (starting on handwritten page 9) -- 1.1.c: "Country Planned" for "Country Club Planned" 1.1.d: "twenty (27)" for "twenty -seven (27)" 4.2: "anyone" for "any one" Exhibit "A" -- Planned Community Development Plan Amendment (handwritten page 15) appears to be meant to refer to Attachment CC5 (starting on handwritten page 51) Resolution No. 2012 -10A (starting on handwritten page 19) -- 1.2: "include of" for "include" 2.2: "containing" for "contained" 3.A -1: "in the PCDP in that and" for "in the PCDP and" 3.B -2: "circulation design, all other project components" for "circulation design and all other project components" "review application will not detrimental" "review application will not be detrimental" 3.C: "to maximize of aesthetic quality of" for "to maximize the aesthetic quality of" 4.4: "until such time the Newport Beach" for "until such time as the Newport Beach" Exhibit "A" (starting on handwritten page 24) 2: "the associate parking lot" for "the associated parking lot" 3: "until such time the Newport Beach" for "until such time as the Newport Beach" 15: "shall be minimized to maximum" for "shall be minimized to the maximum" Ordinance No. 2012 -3 (starting on handwritten page 35) -- i 1.1.c: "Site Development Permit" may be intentional, but is elsewhere referred to as "Site Development Review" "Country Planned" appears for "Country Club Planned" 1.1.d: "twenty (27)" for "twenty -seven (27)" 3.2.b: "of same the square footage" for "of the same square footage" 3.2.d: "the 17 tennis courts" for "17 tennis courts" 4.2: "anyone" for "any one" Exhibit "A" -- Development Agreement (handwritten page 41) to be meant to refer to Attachment CC7 (starting on handwritten page 81) Note: I have not read through Attachments CCS and CC7 so I don't know if they contain typos or not. 4