Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 - Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update - PA2016-091 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT September 22, 2016 Agenda Item No. 2 SUBJECT: Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update (PA2016-091) 20662 Newport Coast Drive • Mitigated Negative Declaration No. ND2016-002 • Conditional Use Permit No. UP2016-024 • Limited Term Permit No. XP2016-007 APPLICANTS: Fortistar, AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless OWNER: OC Waste & Recycling (County of Orange) PLANNER: Benjamin M. Zdeba, AICP, Associate Planner (949) 644-3253, bzdeba@newportbeachca.gov PROJECT SUMMARY The applicants propose demolition of the existing gas-to-energy facility structures and the construction of both temporary and permanent collocated wireless telecommunication facilities at the closed Coyote Canyon Landfill gas-to-energy facility site. The project site is located at the top of a hill in an open space area near Sage Hill School. The wireless carriers (AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless) all maintain existing facilities at the project site with antennas collocated on a 105-foot-high exhaust stack. The exhaust stack will be demolished, which necessitates the removal of existing wireless telecommunications facility antennas attached to it. A conditional use permit is requested to allow the construction of two collocated 65-foot-high faux eucalyptus trees, which will serve as permanent wireless telecommunications facilities for the four carriers. A limited term permit is requested to construct two collocated temporary wireless telecommunications facilities during construction to avoid a disruption in service. RECOMMENDATION 1) Conduct a public hearing; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. _ adopting Mitigated Negative Declaration No. ND2016- 002 and approving Conditional Use Permit No. UP2016-024 and Limited Term Permit No. XP2016-007 (Attachment No. PC 1). 1 V� QP �P Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update Planning Commission, September 22, 2016 Page 2 VICINITY MAP �•4 R• S e f £ Coyote Canyon Landfill Sage Hill.S�qhool0 Project Site 73 t e, GENERAL PLAN ZONING C� G� I LOCATION GENERAL PLAN ZONING JE CURRENT USE(S) ON-SITE Open Space OS Open Space (:O:S=l Landfill-gas recover facilit NORTH OS and Private Institutions OS and Private Open space and Sage Hill School PI Institutions (PI) ge OS and Single-Unit OS and Newport RidOpen space and single-family SOUTH Residential Detached (RS-D) Planned Community(PC- homes EAST OS OS Open space and State Route 73 OS and Parks and OS and Parks and WEST Recreation PR Recreation (PR) Open space and former landfill 3 Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update Planning Commission, September 22, 2016 Page 3 INTRODUCTION Project Setting The project site is developed with the Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility (currently operated by Fortistar), which is part of the closed Coyote Canyon Landfill. Landfill gas from the closed landfill is collected at the site and up until late 2015, the collected gas was converted to electricity. The site is located on a hill approximately 780 feet above mean sea level surrounded by open space approximately 900 feet south of the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor and east of Newport Coast Drive. Sage Hill School is located approximately 1,300 feet north and the Newport Coast and Newport Ridge communities are located south of the project site. The site is accessed by way of a private road from Newport Coast Drive at a signalized intersection. Surrounding the site is a 12-foot-high perimeter block wall with several trees that provide screening of the facility. The site serves as an existing location for a collocated wireless telecom facility with four carriers on the existing 105-foot-high exhaust stack that is visible from multiple viewpoints in the vicinity. Project Description Fortistar will be demolishing several of the existing landfill-gas recovery facility structures including the 105-foot-high exhaust stack that currently supports antennas for four wireless telecommunications carriers. OC Waste & Recyling is requiring the demolition of the exhaust stack and most of the existing structures as they are not currently being used. The landfill gas collection, flaring and monitoring system will remain and will continue to operate. In order to maintain wireless coverage, the applicant team proposes to erect two temporary monopoles collocated with two carriers each prior to demolition of the exhaust stack. Once demolition is complete, two 65-foot tall permanent faux trees will be constructed each supporting antennas and related equpment for two carriers. The associated support equipment is proposed within existing equipment enclosure areas adjacent to the perimeter wall of the project site. Faux eucalyptus trees were selected as they might blend into the existing trees that surround and screen the project site. As part of the project, the existing eucalyptus tree screen was evaluated and most of the trees are dead and dying due to a lack of maintenance and the drought. These trees must be removed and the project includes planting of replacement trees and a functioning irrigation system to help ensure the longevity of those replacement trees. Due to the fact that the property is subject to the Natural Communities Conservation Plan, Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP), eucalyptus trees will not be used as replacements since they are nonnative. For additional detailed information, please reference the Tree Health Assessment Report and Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan, which are included as Appendix A and Appendix B, respectively, to the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Attachment No. PC 3). 4 Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update Planning Commission, September 22, 2016 Page 4 Photographic visual simulations from five vantage points depicting the existing and proposed conditions at the site upon installation, after five years of tree growth, and at full tree maturity are included as Attachment No. PC 7. Most notable is the removal of the 105-foot-high exhaust stack, which will improve the visual appearance of the site. Project plans are also include as Attachment No. PC 8. According to the wireless telecom providers, the proposed replacement facility would maintain existing coverage while enhancing network capacity. The facility will also allow opportunities for future improvement as technology advances that may lead to improved service. DISCUSSION Consistency with General Plan and Zoning Code The General Plan designates the site as Open Space (OS), and it is zoned Open Space (OS). The OS designation is intended to provide areas for a range of public and private uses to protect, maintain, and enhance the community's natural resources. The proposed telecom facility is consistent with this designation in that it will be located within the grounds of the existing landfill-gas recovery facility and will help to prevent the need for locating a telecom facility elsewhere within the OS designation where a similar facility had not been located previously. Furthermore, telecom facilities are only permitted within the OS district when collocated on an existing utility tower within a utility easement, or collocated on an existing facility. In this case, the proposed project includes replacement and enhancement of existing telecom equipment on an existing collocated telecom facility'. The proposed replacement will take advantage of the existing equipment enclosures, which exist to support the current arrays on the exhaust stack. Other antennas are located on the perimeter walls and will remain as part of the proposed project. Furthermore, the 105-foot-high exhaust stack will be removed and the replacement facility will be screened as part of the project consistent with the spirit of General Plan Natural Resources Policy NR 21.1, which states that signs, utilities and antennas shall be sited and designed to minimize visual impacts. ' Telecommunication(s) Facility, Telecom Facility, Telecom Facilities, Wireless Telecommunications Facility, or Facility. "Telecommunication(s) facility," "telecom facility," "telecom facilities," "wireless telecommunications facility," or simply "facility" or "facilities' means an installation that sends and/or receives wireless radio frequency signals or electromagnetic waves, including but not limited to directional, omni-directional and parabolic antennas, structures or towers to support receiving and/or transmitting devices, supporting equipment and structures, and the land or structure on which they are all situated. The term does not include mobile transmitting devices, such as vehicle or hand held radios/telephones and their associated transmitting antennas. Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update Planning Commission, September 22, 2016 Page 5 Facility Location and Design Chapter 20.49 (Wireless Telecommunications Facilities) of the Zoning Code specifies that review by Planning Commission is required for installation of new freestanding structure installations. The proposed project is the third faux tree application to be reviewed by the City. The first faux tree was reviewed and approved by the City Council on March 26, 2013, and is located at 2401 Irvine Avenue. The second faux tree application was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on October 8, 2015, and is located at 23 Corporate Plaza. A photograph of the existing installation at 2401 Irvine Avenue is included as Attachment No. PC 10. Section 20.49.040 (Telecom Facility Preferences and Prohibited Locations) provides five location classes in priority order that are listed below: 1. Class 1 (Stealth/Screened) Installations. 2. Class 2 (Visible) Installations. 3. Class 3 (Public Right-of-Way) Installations. 4. Class 4 (Freestanding Structure) Installations. 5. Class 5 (Temporary) Installations. A new faux tree is considered a Class 4 (Freestanding Structure) facility. The applicant determined that higher priority installations (Classes 1-3) are not feasible for this project. Pursuant to Section 20.49.030 (Definitions) "feasible" means capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account environmental, physical, legal and technological factors. The applicant explains in the project description and justification (Attachment No. PC 6) that the new faux trees are the best design option for the site and meets their objectives to maintain coverage for this area. The primary need is to maintain the elevations of the existing antennas attached to the exhaust stack. There is no other feasible way to provide 50- and 65-foot-high platforms without new freestanding structures. The goal of the design is to integrate the new telecom facilities with the existing development characterized by the existing trees that surround the project site. Height Limitation The project site is located within the OS district and is subject to the Nonresidential, Non-shoreline Height Limit Area standards. The maximum height allowable within this area is 50 feet. Chapter 20.49 allows telecom facilities to exceed the maximum height by up to 15 feet provided the additional findings provided in Section 20.49.050 (General Development and Design Standards) Subsection C are made: a. The increased height will not result in undesirable or abrupt scale changes or relationships being created between the proposed telecom facility and existing adjacent developments or public spaces; and Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update Planning Commission, September 22, 2016 Page 6 b. Establishment of the telecom facility at the requested height is necessary to provide service. The existing telecom facility equipment is located on a 105-foot-high exhaust stack. The proposed replacement facility equipment will be located at the same or similar height as the existing equipment; however, the overall structure height will be reduced by 40 feet. In order to maintain the existing service to the Newport Coast and Newport Ridge areas, the applicants indicate the new antenna arrays must be located such that they are at least as tall as the current arrays on the exhaust stack. The carriers tested conceptual installations at lower heights and provided coverage maps to staff that showed diminished coverage. The proposed trees are similar in height to the existing trees and proposed trees at maturity. Although the 65-foot-high faux tree structures may initially appear abruptly taller than other trees in the vicinity, the site is situated on a hilltop such that the elevation difference and distance between it and other uses should minimize the noticeable variation in height. New Facility Collocation Section 20.49.050 (General Development and Design Standards) Subsection E (Design Techniques) of the Zoning Code emphasizes that to the greatest extent practicable, new Class 4 facilities shall be designed and sited to facilitate the collocation of one additional telecom operator. In this particular case, each of the two faux tree structures is effectively designed to accommodate two carriers. Development and Desiqn Standards Section 20.49.050 (General Development and Design Standards) requires proposed freestanding antennas to be visually compatible with surrounding buildings and vegetation. In reviewing this application, the Planning Commission shall consider the blending, screening, and size of the proposed facility. 1. Blending. The extent to which the proposed facility blends into the surrounding environment or is architecturally integrated into structure. 2. Screening. The extent to which the proposed facility is concealed, screened or camouflaged by existing or proposed new topography, vegetation, buildings or other structures. 3. Size. The total size of the proposed facility, particularly in relation to surrounding and supporting structures. Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update Planning Commission, September 22, 2016 Page 7 A faux tree design was identified by the telecom applicants due to the existing visual environment of the surrounding area. It should blend into the existing and replacement tree canopy. As proposed, the bark would be textured and painted to blend with the existing and proposed trees to be planted adjacent to the site. Preferred faux tree designs include fully screened antennas and equipment without visible brackets, cables, or conduit. The installation of artificial trees or shrubbery is strongly discouraged if they are obviously not natural to the average reasonable observer or are inappropriately located. A photograph of a materials board is attached to demonstrate the type of materials that will be used to help screen the proposed facility (Attachment No. PC 11). Staff believes the location of the project site being nearly 1,000 feet from Newport Coast Drive, 1,200 feet from the nearest residential neighborhood, and 1,300 feet from Sage Hill School, will also help limit any visibility of equipment and will further help to ensure the artificial trees are not blatantly distinguishable from the surrounding area. The use of existing natural or manmade features is encouraged to provide the greatest amount of visual screening. The branches and leaves are intended to screen the antennas from view thereby creating a more inconspicuous facility that blends with the existing development and the surrounding environment. The proposed facility is not located in an area adjacent to a coastal view road or public coastal view point. Freestanding installations should be designed to complement a site and screen all elements of the telecom facility including the support equipment. The proposed support equipment is located adjacent to the project site within existing equipment enclosures, so it is screened from view by a 12-foot block wall. Required Findings Pursuant to Section 20.52.020.F (Findings and Decision) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, the Planning Commission must make the following findings in order to approve a conditional use permit: 1. The use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable Specific Plan; 2. The use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code and the Municipal Code; 3. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the use are compatible with the allowed uses in the vicinity; 4. The site is physically suitable in terms of design, location, shape, size, operating characteristics, and the provision of public and emergency vehicle (e.g., fire and medical) access and public services and utilities; and 5. Operation of the use at the location proposed would not be detrimental to the harmonious and orderly growth of the City, or endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise 2 Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update Planning Commission, September 22, 2016 Page 8 constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed replacement telecom facility is compatible with the uses permitted under the OS land use designation of the Land Use Element of the General Plan and the OS Zoning District. The proposed telecom facility is considered an ancillary structure that is accessory to the primary landfill-gas recovery use and the proposed facility. Being that the proposed project will replace and enhance an existing collocated facility within the OS district, this site is not considered a prohibited location under Section 20.49.040 (Telecom Facility Preferences and Prohibited Locations). Much of the existing support equipment and antennas located on the perimeter walls will remain as part of the proposed project. The facility is designed to maximize the blending and screening of the antennas and support equipment so that it is compatible with the surrounding development. Adequate circulation is provided through the site and adverse aesthetic, sound, or odor impacts are not anticipated. Pursuant to Section 20.49.060 (Permit Review Procedures) Subsection H (Required Findings for Telecom Facilities) of the Zoning Code, the applicant seeking approval for a telecommunications facility must show to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission that: a. The proposed telecom facility is visually compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. b. The proposed telecom facility complies with height, location and design standards, as provided for in this chapter. c. An alternative site(s) located further from a residential district, public park or public facility cannot feasibly fulfill the coverage needs fulfilled by the installation at the proposed site. d. An alternative plan that would result in a higher preference facility class category for the proposed facility is not available or reasonably feasible and desirable under the circumstances. A faux tree design was chosen by the applicants due to the necessary height and because the branches and leaves are intended to screen the antennas from view thereby creating a more inconspicuous facility that blends with the existing development and the surrounding visual environment. During the preparation of the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, the majority of the existing tree canopy, including eucalyptus trees, was identified as dead and dying. The project site is located entirely within the Natural Community Conservation Plan Reserve. Since eucalyptus trees are nonnative species, like-for-like replacement is not permissible. As identified in the Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan, the proposed replacement trees will consist of native species including Coast Live Oak, Peruvian Pepper, and Western 9 Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update Planning Commission, September 22, 2016 Page 9 Sycamore/White Alder. Although these trees will not be as tall as the existing eucalyptus trees at full maturity, staff believes they will serve to effectively screen the landfill-gas recovery facility and will blend the faux tree structures into the natural landscape. It should also be noted Mitigation Measure MM-2 regarding aesthetics gives the City flexibility to modify the replacement plan as necessary to ensure there are no major gaps for the long-term visual screening of the project site. It is acknowledged the removal of the existing trees and replacement will make the proposed telecom facility structures more prominent in the earlier years of growth; however, an adequate mixture of quicker-growing and slower-growing trees will be planted and the visual environment will benefit from the replacement at full maturity. The proposed faux trees at 65 feet high comply with the discretionary height limit for telecom facilities on the subject property. The telecom facility is located within the walls of the existing landfill-gas recovery facility away from residential districts and public park facilities. The public facility is the Newport Coast Community Center, which is located approximately 1,600 feet to the southwest of the project site. The applicants determined that higher priority installations (Classes 1-3) are not feasible for this project given the existing conditions of the site and the removal of the 105-foot- high exhaust stack. The principle reason other Classes will not work is the need to maintain the height of the existing antennas and existing topography. If the antennas on the stack are lowered, coverage would be diminished and the only want to achieve the height is to allow new free standing structures. In conclusion, staff believes the facility is appropriately designed and located for compatibility with the surrounding visual environment. Temporary Telecom Facility Installation The carriers are proposing two collocated monopole structures to be constructed prior to demolition of the exhaust stack to ensure wireless coverage is not disrupted. These temporary monopoles will be in place until the permanent faux tree structures are constructed and operational. Due to the sensitive habitat and the existing tree canopy, construction cannot occur during nesting bird season (i.e., February 15 to August 31). Since the construction of the permanent facility cannot feasibly be completed prior to February 15, 2017, the two temporary antenna towers will be in place for about 12 months. Class 5 (Temporary) installations are permitted subject to the approval of a limited term permit. Pursuant to Section 20.52.040.G (Findings and Decision) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, the Planning Commission must make the following findings in order to approve a limited term permit: 1. The operation of the requested limited duration use at the location proposed and within the time period specified would not be detrimental to the harmonious and 10 Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update Planning Commission, September 22, 2016 Page 10 orderly growth of the City, nor endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the requested limited duration use; 2. The subject lot is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the limited duration use without material detriment to the use and enjoyment of other properties located adjacent to and in the vicinity of the lot; 3. The subject lot is adequately served by streets or highways having sufficient width and improvements to accommodate the kind and quantity of traffic that the limited duration use would or could reasonably be expected to generate; 4. Adequate temporary parking to accommodate vehicular traffic to be generated by the limited duration use would be available either on-site or at alternate locations acceptable to the Zoning Administrator; and 5. The limited duration use is consistent with all applicable provisions of the General Plan, any applicable specific plan, the Municipal Code, and other City regulations. The temporary monopoles will be a maximum of 65 feet high to maintain existing coverage. Given this height and the fact they are temporary installations, screening of the monopoles is not feasible. However, due to the nesting bird season, the existing trees will remain until September 2017, and should provide some screening for most of the time the temporary installations are in place. As these are temporary telecom facilities, which will be unmanned, there should be no detriment to the operation of the landfill-gas recovery facility. Any trips to the site for maintenance purposes would be limited. Although there is no striping, adequate area exists to accommodate parking of several vehicles as needed. Summary The County of Orange is requiring the removal of all obsolete structures at the Coyote Canyon Landfill-Gas Recovery Facility, which includes the 105-foot-high exhaust stack. Four wireless telecommunications carriers presently have antenna arrays and supporting equipment attached to the exhaust stack. In order to maintain service while providing opportunities for enhancement of that coverage, the carriers are proposing the installation of two 65-foot-high faux tree structures. Each faux tree structure will accommodate antennas and related equipment for two carriers. Early on in the application process, the County reached out to several agencies including, but not limited to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and has continued to work closely with those 11 Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update Planning Commission, September 22, 2016 Page 11 agencies regarding the replacement of existing vegetation in particular. In addition, the County also made contact and held meetings with several neighborhood representatives who have been educating the Newport Coast and Ridge area Homeowners Associations as well as other residents regarding the project. Those representatives expressed appreciation the exhaust stack would be removed as part of the project, but questioned the need for 65-foot-high structures as a replacement facility. As a result, the carriers also became engaged and worked with the County, the City, and the neighborhood representatives to vet other design options that might have led to a less visible solution. Subsequent to the most recent meeting, the neighborhood representatives submitted correspondence generally summarizing the meeting and expressing concern over the level of coverage provided. This letter has been included as Attachment No. PC 9. The carriers have indicated the proposed installations will maintain existing coverage, but will further provide an opportunity to improve existing coverage as technology advances with replacement antennas and supporting equipment that would be blended within the faux tree design. In essence, a reduced height alternative would reduce coverage and the faux tree design was identified as the best option in terms of blending with the existing visual environment while maintaining the service that is currently provided by the existing facility. Staff believes the faux trees will blend into the natural landscape given the distance, elevation and intervening topography between the site and the nearby uses. Alternatives Staff believes that the findings for approval can be made for the proposed project as recommended and the facts in support of the required findings are presented in the draft resolution (Attachment No. PC 1). However, the following alternatives are available to the Planning Commission: 1. The Planning Commission may suggest specific changes that are necessary to alleviate any concerns such as the project height, resulting in abrupt changes in scale, blending, screening, size or project compatibility with the area. If any additional requested changes are substantial, the item could be continued to a future meeting. Should the Planning Commission choose to do so, staff will return once the applicant has had an opportunity to revise the project accordingly with a revised resolution incorporating new findings and/or conditions. 2. If the Planning Commission believes that there are insufficient facts to support the proposed telecommunications facility, the Planning Commission may deny the application in the attached draft resolution for denial (Attachment No. PC 2). Environmental Review In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was prepared for the project. Prior to 12 Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update Planning Commission, September 22, 2016 Page 12 taking action on the proposed project, the Planning Commission must first review, consider, and adopt the IS/MND (Attachment No. PC 3). The IS/MND is comprised of the Notice of Intent (NOI), Initial Study (IS), Environmental Analysis, and Appendices. Based upon the analysis of the Initial Study, the environmental categories within which the project would have either no impact or less than significant impact were: Agricultural/Forest Resources, Air Quality, Geology/Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hydrology/Water Quality, Mineral Resources, Noise, Population/Housing, Public Services, Recreation, and Utilities/Service Systems. Based upon the analysis of the Initial Study, the environmental categories within which the project would have potentially significant impacts were: Aesthetics, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Hazards/Hazardous Materials, Land Use/Planning, and Transportation/Traffic. Specific mitigation measures have been included to reduce the potentially significant adverse effects to a less than significant level. On the basis of the analysis provided in the IS/MND, staff has concluded that the project would not have a significant impact on the environment. The IS/MND reflects the independent judgment of the City and recognizes project design features, standard construction and engineering practices, and review and reevaluation of future projects as the means to avoid potential impacts. The IS/MND was completed and circulated for a mandatory 30-day public review period that began on August 3, 2016, and concluded on September 2, 2016. Nine comment letters were received. Those letters have been catalogued and are responded to as part of the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration (Attachment No. PC 4). The comments received were generally not substantive to the environmental review. Public Notice Notice of this hearing was published in the Daily Pilot, mailed to all owners of property within 300 feet of the boundaries of the landfill site and adjoining commercial areas (excluding intervening rights-of-way and waterways) including the applicant and posted on the subject property at least 10 days before the scheduled meeting, consistent with the provisions of the Municipal Code. Additionally, the item appeared on the agenda for this meeting, which was posted at City Hall and on the City website. Prepared by: S mitterrd by: a in deba, AICP r n a Wisnes i, 1CP, Deputy Director ssociat lanner 13 Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update Planning Commission, September 22, 2016 Page 13 ATTACHMENTS PC 1 Draft Resolution for Approval PC 2 Draft Resolution for Denial PC 3 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration PC 4 Final MND and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program PC 5 Applicants' Justification PC 6 Applicants' Coverage Maps PC 7 Photographic Visual Simulations PC 8 Project Plans PC 9 Correspondence from Newport Coast and Ridge Representatives PC 10 Faux Eucalyptus Tree Installation at 2401 Irvine Avenue PC 11 Photographic Example of a Faux Eucalyptus Materials Board 05/26/16 -4 Attachment No. PC 1 Draft Resolution for Approval 15 V� QP �P 2� RESOLUTION NO. #### A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. ND2016-002, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. UP2016-024 AND LIMITED TERM PERMIT NO. XP2016-007 FOR THE COYOTE CANYON GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE LOCATED AT 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE (PA2016-091) THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FACTS. 1. An application was filed by Fortistar, AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, and Verizon Wireless (collectively the "applicants"), with respect to property located at 20662 Newport Coast Drive, and legally described as a Portion of Block 128, Tract No. 361 of the Irvine Subdivision requesting approval of a conditional use permit and a limited term permit. 2. The applicants propose demolition of the existing gas-to-energy facility structures and the construction of both temporary and permanent collocated wireless telecommunication facilities at the closed Coyote Canyon Landfill gas-to-energy facility site. The project site is located at the top of a hill in an open space area near Sage Hill School. AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless all maintain existing facilities at the project site with antennas collocated on a 105-foot-high exhaust stack. The exhaust stack will be demolished, which necessitates the removal of existing wireless telecommunications facility antennas attached to it. A conditional use permit is requested to allow the construction of two collocated 65-foot-high faux eucalyptus trees, which will serve as permanent wireless telecommunications facilities for the four carriers. A limited term permit is requested to construct two collocated temporary wireless telecommunications facilities during construction of the faux trees to avoid a disruption in service. 3. The subject property is located within the Open Space (OS) Zoning District and the General Plan Land Use Element category is Open Space (OS). 4. The subject property is not located within the coastal zone. 5. A public hearing was held on September 22, 2016, in the Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and purpose of the public hearing was given in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the Planning Commission at this public hearing. 17 Planning Commission Resolution No. Ott Page 2 of 19 SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DETERMINATION. 1. An Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration have been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and City Council Policy K-3. 2. The draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for a 30-day comment period beginning on August 3, 2016, and ending on September 2, 2016. The contents of the environmental document and comments on the document were considered by the Planning Commission in its review of the proposed project. 3. On the basis of the entire environmental review record, the proposed project, with mitigation measures, will have a less than significant impact upon the environment and there are no known substantial adverse effects on human beings that would be caused. Additionally, there are no long-term environmental goals that would be compromised by the project, nor cumulative impacts anticipated in connection with the project. The mitigation measures identified and incorporated in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program are feasible and will reduce the potential environmental impacts to a less than significant level. 4. The Mitigated Negative Declaration and related Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached as Exhibit "B" are hereby adopted. The document and all material, which constitute the record upon which this decision was based, are on file with the Planning Division, City Hall, 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. SECTION 3. REQUIRED FINDINGS. Conditional Use Permit In accordance with Newport Beach Municipal Code (NBMC) Section 20.52.020(F) (Conditional Use Permits and Minor Use Permits), the following findings and facts in support of such findings are set forth: Finding: A. The use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The site is located within the OS land use designation in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The OS designation is intended to provide areas for a range of public and private uses to protect, maintain, and enhance the community's natural resources. The proposed replacement collocated telecom facility is consistent with this designation in that it will be located within the grounds of the existing landfill-gas recovery facility and will help to prevent the need for locating a telecom facility elsewhere within the OS designation where a similar facility had not been located previously. 05-26-2016 12 Planning Commission Resolution No. #### Page 3 of 19 2. General Plan Natural Resources Policy NR 21.1 states that signs, utilities and antennas shall be sited and designed to minimize visual impacts. The proposed project will include removal of the existing 105-foot-high exhaust stack. The new collocated telecom facility will include the installation of two faux trees blended to match the existing environment, which will help to enhance the existing aesthetics of the landfill-gas recovery facility property as can be seen from the adjacent residential neighborhoods and public roadways. 3. The project site is not in a specific plan area. Finding: B. The use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code and the Municipal Code. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The site is located within the OS Zoning District. This district is intended to provide areas to maintain and protect the community's natural open space resources and to maintain and protect landscaped open spaced areas located within residential and nonresidential developments, where no further development is allowed. See Fact in Support of Finding No. A-1 above. 2. NBMC Chapter 20.49 (Wireless Telecommunications Facilities) identifies a telecom facility that includes faux trees as a Class 4 (Freestanding Structure) installation, which is permissible subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. 3. NBMC Section 20.49.040(B)(3) (Telecom Facility Preferences and Prohibited Locations) prohibits telecom facilities in the OS Zoning District, unless they are collocated on an existing utility tower within a utility easement area, or collocated on an existing facility. A "telecommunications facility" includes the supporting equipment and structures as well as the land or structures on which they are situated by Zoning Code definition. Here, the telecommunications facility is proposed to be collocated on an existing facility, as it will use existing support equipment and be situated on land currently used by utilities and telecommunication facilities. 4. NBMC Section 20.49.040(A) prioritizes telecom facilities as follows: 1) collocation of a new facility at an existing facility; 2) Class 1 (Stealth/Screened); 3) Class 2 (Visible Antennas) and Class 3 (Public Right-of-Way), Class 4 (Freestanding Structure), and Class 5 (Temporary). Although lower on the listing of priority facilities, the proposed facility is designed such that it will not visually dominate the surrounding area and is intended to blend seamlessly into the infrastructure of the neighborhood. 5. Supporting equipment will be installed within the existing equipment enclosure areas adjacent to the existing 12-foot-high perimeter walls surrounding the project site. 05-26-2016 19 Planning Commission Resolution No. #### Page 4 of 19 6. The proposed facility will comply with applicable requirements of the Zoning Code with construction as shown on the project plans and implementation of the conditions of approval as well as the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Finding: C. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the use are compatible with the allowed uses in the vicinity. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The proposed design of the faux trees will replicate that of existing and proposed nearby trees, which will help to blend in with the surrounding environment of the hillside where the site is located. As conditioned and incorporated as part of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, the existing landscaping that is dead and/or dying will be removed and replaced with new trees and improved irrigation systems to help enhance and produce a complementary visual screening of the site that blends with the surrounding environment. 2. The support equipment for the site will be placed in existing screened enclosure areas. 3. The proposed telecom facility will be unmanned, will have no impact on the circulation system, and, as conditioned, will not generate noise, odor, smoke, or any other adverse impacts to adjacent land uses. 4. The nearest residential property is approximately 1,200 feet south of the project site and Sage Hill School is approximately 1,300 feet north of the project site. Both proximate uses are buffered by the surrounding 12-foot-high perimeter wall, adjacent landscaped open space area and its intervening topography. 5. The proposed telecommunications facility will help to enhance coverage and capacity for residents and visitors in the area by providing wireless access to voice and data transmission services. The proposed facility will not result in any material changes to the character of the local community. Finding: D. The site is physically suitable in terms of design, location, shape, size, operating characteristics, and the provision of public and emergency vehicle (e.g., fire and medical) access and public services and utilities. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. Adequate public and emergency vehicle access, public services, and utilities are provided to and around the subject site and the proposed continuation of an existing use will not change this. 05-26-2016 20 Planning Commission Resolution No. #### Page 5 of 19 2. The proposed telecom facility will be unmanned and will have no impact on the circulation system and adjacent land uses. 3. The Public Works Department, Building Division, Police Department, and Fire Department have reviewed the project proposal and do not have any concerns regarding access, public services, or utilities provided to the existing neighborhood and surrounding area. 4. As conditioned and incorporated as part of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, the existing landscaping that is dead and/or dying will be removed and replaced with new trees and improved irrigation systems to help prevent fire hazards and improve upon the overall safety of the project site. Finding: E. Operation of the use at the location proposed would not be detrimental to the harmonious and orderly growth of the City, nor endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The proposed facility will comply with the applicable rules, regulations and standards of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), thus ensuring public health and safety. 2. Implementation of the conditions of approval and mitigation measures identified within the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program will help to preclude significant adverse impacts to the environment. 3. The proposed facility is not located in an area adjacent to a coastal view road or public coastal view point. Wireless Telecommunications Facility Specific Findings In accordance with NBMC Section 20.49.060(H)(1) (Permit Review Procedures), the following additional findings and facts in support of such findings are set forth: Finding: F. The proposed telecom facility is visually compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The existing telecom facility includes four collocated antenna arrays on a 105-foot-high exhaust stack, which is easily visible from most adjacent public roadways and 05-26-2016 21 Planning Commission Resolution No. #### Page 6 of 19 residential neighborhoods. As part of the proposed project, this visual obstruction will be removed; therefore, immediately improving the aesthetics of the project site and surrounding environment. 2. The proposed telecom facility will include two new 65-foot-high faux trees with supporting equipment screened within existing adjacent enclosure areas. Installation of the new freestanding structure will not appear out of character with the surrounding neighborhood as the facility will blend with the revitalized landscape of the area. Finding: G. The proposed telecom facility complies with height, location and design standards, as provided for in this chapter. Facts in Support of Finding: 1 . The existing wireless telecommunications facility relies upon the 105-foot-high exhaust stack, which will be removed as part of this project. The proposed telecom facility will replicate the existing antenna array heights and will frttther enhance the aesthetic design of the site by collocating on faux tree structures. The faux tree structures are conditioned to blend with the existing and replacement native trees in the area and will not exceed 65-foot height allowance permissible. 2. The facilities' location is an existing landfill-gas recovery facility, with existing support equipment, situated in the middle of an open space area where adverse impacts to surrounding land uses are minimized to the greatest extent feasible. 3. The faux trees' branches and leaves are intended to screen the antennas from view thereby creating a more inconspicuous facility that blends with the existing development and the surrounding landscape. The design of the faux trees will be consistent with the surrounding vegetation and replacement trees. As conditioned and incorporated as part of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, the existing landscaping that is dead and/or dying will be removed and replaced with new trees and improved irrigation systems to help enhance and produce a complementary visual screening of the site. 4. The support equipment will be located within in a screened enclosure area directly adjacent to the site. Finding: H. An alternative site(s) located further from a residential district, public park or public facility cannot feasibly fulfill the coverage needs fulfilled by the installation at the proposed site. 05-26-2016 22 Planning Commission Resolution No. #### Page 7 of 19 Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The intervening topography severely limits alternative site options as many of the nearby buildings hinder the coverage objectives and do not fulfill the need demonstrated to maintain and enhance coverage and capacity. The applicant has provided maps that demonstrate some improved coverage within the immediate vicinity as a result of the proposed replacement facility. 2. The proposed replacement facility is located in the landfill-gas recovery facility within an open space area away from residential districts and public park facilities. The closest public facility is the Newport Coast Community Center located approximately 1,600 feet to the southwest of the project site. The design of the proposed replacement facilities is intended to minimize its visibility to surrounding residential development, as well as to vehicle traffic along Newport Coast Drive and State Route 73. 3. The site is viable in maintaining and balancing the applicant's needs for radio frequency (RF) coverage and capacity while keeping a significant distance from single- family residential areas. Finding: 1. An alternative plan that would result in a higher preference facility class category for the proposed facility is not available or reasonably feasible and desirable under the circumstances. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. Alternative designs were considered using higher priority installations; however, the height necessary to maintain and enhance existing coverage and capacity would cause an abrupt change in the rhythm and would detriment the aesthetics of the site. 2. The proposed faux tree installations will blend well with the existing and enhanced landscaping in the vicinity of the perimeter walls for the landfill-gas recovery facility site. 3. The proposed replacement facility will allow the maintenance and enhancement of existing coverage and capacity. Finding: J. The increased height will not result in undesirable or abrupt scale changes or relationships between the proposed telecom facility and existing developments or public spaces. 05-26-2016 2S Planning Commission Resolution No. #### Page 8 of 19 Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The existing antenna arrays are located on the 105-foot-high exhaust stack, which will be removed as part of the proposed project. The replacement antenna arrays will be located on two collocated, 65-foot-high faux trees; thus, eliminating 40 feet of vertical structure. 2. The proposed faux trees are conditioned such that they will be designed to blend well with the existing and enhanced vegetation surrounding the landfill-gas recovery facility. 3. The landfill-gas recovery facility is situated approximately 780 feet above mean sea level with intervening topography in between the site and public roads or adjacent residential neighborhoods. From the lower elevations along Newport Coast Drive near San Joaquin Hills Road, visibility of the proposed replacement facility will be minimized. Finding: K. Establishment of the telecom facility at the requested height is necessary to provide service. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The proposed replacement facility will place antenna arrays at the same or similar heights to those of the existing arrays placed on the taller exhaust stack. A lower arrangement would be detrimental to existing coverage. 2. The increased height to a maximum of 65 feet will not only allow for maintenance of existing coverage, but will provide an opportunity for the carriers to enhance coverage and improve capacity for the nearby roadways and residential neighborhoods. Limited Term Permit In accordance with NBMC Section 20.52.040(G) (Limited Term Permits — Findings and Decisions), the following findings and facts in support of such findings are set forth: Finding: A. The operation of the requested limited duration use at the location proposed and within the time period specified would not be detrimental to the harmonious and orderly growth of the City, nor endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the requested limited duration use. 05-26-2016 24 Planning Commission Resolution No. #### Page 9 of 19 Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The limited term permit will allow two collocated temporary wireless telecom facilities to maintain existing service to the Newport Coast and Newport Ridge areas. 2. As conditioned, the operation of the temporary wireless facility will be limited to a maximum period of 12 months and only during construction of the permanent replacement facility. Although operational 24 hours a day, the facility will be unmanned and will emit minimal noise or light, limiting any impact on nearby residents. 3. The proposed temporary facility will be located within the perimeter of the existing landfill- gas recovery approximately 1,200 feet from the nearest residence, which is buffered from the temporary use by an existing block wall, landscaping, and intervening topography. Finding: B. The subject lot is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the limited duration use without material detriment to the use and enjoyment of other properties located adjacent to and in the vicinity of the lot. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The subject property is approximately 4.14 acres in size and consists of operational structures associated with the landfill-gas recovery facility. Several of the structures will be removed. The resulting scraped area and overall site size will be adequate to accommodate the wireless facility and any existing use of the property without impacting vehicle circulation. Finding: C. The subject lot is adequately served by streets or highways having sufficient width and improvements to accommodate the kind and quantity of traffic that the limited duration use would or could reasonably be expected to generate. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The limited duration use is a temporary wireless telecommunications facility that will not generate traffic, but will maintain service for the Newport Coast and Newport Ridge areas. 2. The subject property is accessed by a single approach taken from Newport Coast Drive at a signalized intersection. The wireless facility will be located such that it will not impede access within the site. 05-26-2016 25 Planning Commission Resolution No. Ott Page 10 of 19 Finding: D. Adequate temporary parking to accommodate vehicular traffic to be generated by the limited duration use would be available either on-site or at alternate locations acceptable to the Planning Commission. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The proposed limited duration use will not create additional parking demand and will be unmanned. Finding: E. The limited duration use is consistent with all applicable provisions of the General Plan, any applicable specific plan, the Municipal Code, and other City regulations. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The site is located within the OS land use designation in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The OS designation is intended to provide areas for a range of public and private uses to protect, maintain, and enhance the community's natural resources. The proposed replacement collocated wireless telecommunications facility is consistent with this designation in that it will be located within the grounds of the existing landfill-gas recovery facility. 2. The site is located within the OS Zoning District. This district is intended to provide areas to maintain and protect the community's natural open space resources and to maintain and protect landscaped open spaced areas located within residential and nonresidential developments, where no further development is allowed. The proposed temporary use will take place within an existing disturbed site where a wireless telecommunications facility currently operates, will be utilized for a limited duration on- site, will not impede use of the site, and will ensure adequate service is maintained during construction of the permanent replacement facility. 3. The limited duration use is conditioned such that it will comply with all applicable provisions of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and other City regulations. 4. The subject lot is not located within a specific plan. SECTION 4. DECISION. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach hereby adopts Mitigated Negative Declaration No. ND2016-002 as depicted in Exhibit "A" and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program as depicted in Exhibit "B" of this resolution, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 05-26-2016 20 Planning Commission Resolution No. ; Page 11 of 19 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. UP2016-024 and Limited Term Permit No. XP2016-007, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "C," which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. This action shall become final and effective fourteen (14) days following the date this Resolution was adopted unless within such time an appeal is filed with the City Clerk in accordance with the provisions of Title 20 Planning and Zoning, of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2016. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: BY: Kory Kramer, Chairman BY: Peter Zak, Secreta 05-26-2016 2j Planning Commission Resolution No. #### Page 12 of 19 EXHIBIT "A" INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. ND2016-002 SCH NO. 2016081012 (Available separate due to document size) http://www.newportbeachca.gov/cegadocuments 05-26-2016 28 Planning Commission Resolution No. #### Page 13 of 19 EXHIBIT "B" MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 05-26-2016 �9 Planning Commission Resolution No. ; Page 14 of 19 EXHIBIT "C" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Division 1. The development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved site plan, equipment plans and elevations stamped and dated with the date of this approval. (Except as modified by applicable conditions of approval.) 2. The project is subject to all applicable City ordinances, policies, and standards, unless specifically waived or modified by the conditions of approval. 3. The telecom facility approved by this permit shall comply with all applicable rules, regulations, and standards of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Division an additional copy of the approved architectural plans for inclusion in the application file. The plans shall be identical to those approved by all City departments for building permit issuance. The approved copy shall include architectural sheets only and shall be reduced in size to 11 inches by 17 inches. The plans shall accurately depict the elements approved by the Conditional Use Permit and shall highlight the approved elements such that they are discernible from other elements of the plans. 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall pay any unpaid administrative costs associated with the processing of this application to the Planning Division. 6. The operator of the telecom facility shall maintain the facility in a manner consistent with the original approval of the facility and all conditions of approval. Anything not specifically approved by this permit is not permitted and must be addressed in a separate and subsequent review. 7. All exposed elements of the facilities including, but not limited to screening, coaxial cables and appurtenances attached to the faux trees shall be color-matched or painted to match the tree or surrounding environment to the satisfaction of the Community Development and Utilities Directors or their respective designees. 8. No portion of the antennas, associated equipment, or mounting structures shall protrude beyond the "branches". 9. The facility shall match the design, style, color, height, and location of the live trees to be planted adjacent to it. In no case shall any portion of the faux trees exceed 65 feet from existing grade wherever the structure is being placed. 05-26-2016 30 Planning Commission Resolution No. #### Page 15 of 19 10. The applicant shall continually maintain the wireless telecom facility so that it retains its original appearance at the time the building permit is finaled by the City of Newport Beach. 11. On an annual basis, the applicant shall conduct maintenance inspections of the wireless telecom facility, including the monopole, equipment enclosure areas and walls, landscape screening, and irrigation systems, and make all necessary repairs. The Community Development Director may require additional inspections and/or maintenance activities at his/her discretion. 12. The applicant shall keep, at all times, all "branches," "leaves," and "bark of the proposed monopole in good repair and appearance. If any part of the monopole is broken, missing, deteriorated, or otherwise in disrepair (as determined by the Community Development Director), the City shall provide written notification to the applicant with specific conditions and items to be repaired or replaced. The applicant shall address the request and complete the repairs and/or replacements within thirty (30) days of receipt of written notification from the City. The Community Development Director has the authority to extend the thirty (30) day time period in the event that more time is required in order for the applicant to perform repairs or replacements. 13. Additional landscaping shall be planted near the telecom facility to screen the facility from view and be maintained in a viable condition, as depicted in the approved landscape plan, with final selection of plants to be approved by the Community Development Director. 14. All noise generated by the proposed use shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 10.26 and other applicable noise control requirements of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. The maximum noise shall be limited to no more than depicted below for the specified time periods unless the ambient noise level is higher. Between the hours of 7:OOAM Between the hours of and 10:OOPM 10:OOPM and 7:OOAM Location Interior Exterior Interior Exterior Residential Property 45dBA 55dBA 40dBA 50dBA Residential Property located within 45dBA 60dBA 45dBA 50dBA 100 feet of a commercial property Mixed Use Property 45dBA 60dBA 45dBA 50dBA Commercial Property N/A 65dBA N/A 60dBA 15. The applicant shall not prevent the City of Newport Beach from having adequate spectrum capacity on the City's 800 MHz radio frequencies at any time. Should interference with the City's Public Safety radio equipment occur, use of the telecom facility authorized by this permit may be suspended until the radio frequency interference is corrected and verification of the compliance is reported. 16. The facility shall transmit at the approved frequency ranges established by the FCC. The applicant shall inform the City, in writing, of any proposed changes to the 05-26-2016 31 Planning Commission Resolution No. ; Page 16 of 19 frequency range in order to prevent interference with the City's Public Safety radio equipment. 17. The applicant recognizes that the frequencies used by the facility are extremely close to the frequencies used by the City of Newport Beach for public safety. This proximity will require extraordinary "comprehensive advanced planning and frequency coordination" engineering measures to prevent interference, especially in the choice of frequencies and radio ancillary hardware. This is encouraged in the "Best Practices Guide" published by the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials- International, Inc. (APCO), and as endorsed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). 18. The applicant shall provide a "single point of contact" in its Engineering and Maintenance Departments that is monitored 24 hours per day to ensure continuity on all interference issues, and to which interference problems may be reported. The name, telephone number, fax number, and e-mail address of that person shall be provided to the Community Development Department and Newport Beach Police Department's Support Services Commander prior to activ''''ation of the facility. a� 19. Appropriate information warning signs or plates shall be posted at the access locations and each transmitting antenna. In addition, contact information (e.g., a telephone number) shall be provided on the warning signs or plates. The location of the information warning signs or plates shall be depicted on the plans submitted for construction permits. 20. No advertising signage or identifying logos shall be displayed on the telecom facility except for small identification, address, warning, and similar information plates. A detail of the information plates depicting the language on the plate shall be included in the plans submitted for issuance of building permits. 21. The telecom facility shall not be lighted except as deemed necessary by the Newport Beach Police Department for security lighting. The night lighting shall be at the lowest intensity necessary for that purpose and such lighting shall be shielded so that direct rays do not shine on nearby properties. Prior to the final of building permits, the applicant shall schedule an evening inspection with the Code Enforcement Division to confirm compliance with this condition. 22. At all times, the operator shall ensure that its telecom facilities comply with the most current regulatory operations standards, and radio frequency emissions standards adopted by the FCC. The operator shall be responsible for obtaining and maintaining the most current information from the FCC regarding allowable radio frequency emissions and all other applicable regulations and standards. Said information shall be made available by the operator upon request at the discretion of the Community Development Director. 23. Any operator who intends to abandon or discontinue use of a telecom facility must notify the Planning Division by certified mail no less than thirty (30) days prior to such 05-26-2016 32 Planning Commission Resolution No. #### Page 17 of 19 action. The operator or property owner shall have ninety (90) days from the date of abandonment or discontinuance to reactivate use of the facility, transfer the rights to use the facility to another operator, or remove the telecom facility and restore the site. 24. The City reserves the right and jurisdiction to review and modify any telecom permit approved pursuant to Chapter 20.49 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, including the conditions of approval, based on changed circumstances. The operator shall notify the Planning Division of any proposal to change the height or size of the facility; increase the size, shape, or number of antennas; change the facility's color, materials, or location on the site; or increase the signal output above the maximum permissible exposure (MPE) limits imposed by the radio frequency emissions guidelines of the FCC. Any changed circumstance shall require the operator to apply for a modification of the original telecom permit and obtain the modified permit prior to implementing any change. 25. This Conditional Use Permit may be modified or revoked by the Planning Commission should they determine that the facility or operator has violated any law regulating the telecom facility or has failed to comply with the requirements of Chapter 20.49 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code (NBMC), or this permit. 26. This approval shall expire and become void unless exercised within 24 months from the actual date of review authority approval, except where an extension of time is approved in compliance with the provisions of Title 20 Planning and Zoning of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. 27. A copy of the Resolution, including conditions of approval Exhibit "A" shall be incorporated into the Building Division and field sets of plans prior to issuance of the building permits. 28. To the fullest extent perhtNy law, applicant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its City Council, its boards and commissions, officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses (including without limitation, attorney's fees, disbursements and court costs) of every kind and nature whatsoever which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to City's approval of the Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update including, but not limited to Conditional Use Permit No. UP2016- 024 and Limited Term Permit No. XP2016-007 (PA2016-091). This indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, damages awarded against the City, if any, costs of suit, attorneys' fees, and other expenses incurred in connection with such claim, action, causes of action, suit or proceeding whether incurred by applicant, City, and/or the parties initiating or bringing such proceeding. The applicant shall indemnify the City for all of City's costs, attorneys' fees, and damages which City incurs in enforcing the indemnification provisions set forth in this condition. The applicant shall pay to the City upon demand any amount owed to the City pursuant to the indemnification requirements prescribed in this condition. 05-26-2016 33 Planning Commission Resolution No. ; Page 18 of 19 Fire Department 29. Prior to the issuance of building permits, fire plan review will be required for all components of the telecommunications installation. 30. Generators must be listed as per California Fire Code Section 604.1.1. Provide manufacturers specification for the generator. Specifications must include fuel capacity and recommended foundation/generator pad. 31. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project plans shall be revised to indicate the battery electrolyte capacity and number of proposed batteries for each cabinet. The storage of batteries must comply with California Fire Code Section 608, Stationary Storage Battery Systems. 32. Prior to the issuance of building permits, manufacturer specifications shall be provided for the generator. The specifications should include fuel tank capacity. 33. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project plans shall be revised to provide a fire extinguisher with a minimum size of 2A 2013C within 30 feet of the generator. Building Division 34. The applicant is required to obtain all applicable permits from the City's Building Division and Fire Department. The construction plans must comply with the most recent, City- adopted version of the California Building Code. The construction plans must meet all applicable State Disabilities Access requirements. 35. The applicant shall employ the following best available control measures ("BACMs") to reduce construction-related air quality impacts: Dust Control • Water all active construction areas at least twice daily. • Cover all haul trucks or maintain at least two feet of freeboard. • Pave or apply water four times daily to all unpaved parking or staging areas. • Sweep or wash any site access points within two hours of any visible dirt deposits on any public roadway. • Cover or water twice daily any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material. • Suspend all operations on any unpaved surface if winds exceed 25 mph. Emissions • Require 90-day low-NOx tune-ups for off road equipment. • Limit allowable idling to 30 minutes for trucks and heavy equipment Off-Site Impacts • Encourage carpooling for construction workers. • Limit lane closures to off-peak travel periods. • Park construction vehicles off traveled roadways. • Wet down or cover dirt hauled off-site. 05-26-2016 34 Planning Commission Resolution No. #### Page 19 of 19 • Sweep access points daily. • Encourage receipt of materials during non-peak traffic hours. • Sandbag construction sites for erosion control. Fill Placement • The number and type of equipment for dirt pushing will be limited on any day to ensure that SCAQMD significance thresholds are not exceeded. • Maintain and utilize a continuous water application system during earth placement and compaction to achieve a 10 percent soil moisture content in the top six-inch surface layer, subject to review/discretion of the geotechnical engineer. Public Works Department 36. If any of the existing public improvements surrounding the site are damaged by the private work, new concrete sidewalk, curb and gutter, street pavement, and other public improvements will be required by the City at the time of private construction completion. Said determination and the extent of the repair work shall be made at the discretion of the Public Works Inspector. 37. The storage of all project related equipment during cons%ction shall be on-site and outside the public right-of-way. 38. All work in the public right-of-way shall follow Newport Beach Municipal Code Chapter 13.20. 39. An approved encroachment permit is required for all work activities within the City's public right-of-way. 40. Prior to commencement of demolition and grading of the project, the applicant shall submit a construction management and delivery plan to be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. The plan shall include discussion of project phasing; parking arrangements for both sites during construction; anticipated haul routes and construction mitigation. Upon approval of the plan, the applicant shall be responsible for implementing and complying with the stipulations set forth in the approved plan. 41. Traffic control and truck route plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department before their implementation. Large construction vehicles shall not be permitted to travel narrow streets as determined by the Public Works Department. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and flagman. 05-26-2016 S5 V� QP �P 3C Attachment No. PC 2 Draft Resolution for Denial 3�t V� QP �P 3g RESOLUTION NO. #### A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. UP2016-024 AND LIMITED TERM PERMIT NO. XP2016-007 FOR THE COYOTE CANYON GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE LOCATED AT 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE (PA2016-091) THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FACTS. 1. An application was filed by Fortistar, AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, and Verizon Wireless (collectively the "applicants"), with respect to property located at 20662 Newport Coast Drive, and legally described as a Portion of Block 128, Tract No. 361 of the Irvine Subdivision requesting approval of a conditional use permitAnd a limited term permit. 2. The applicants propose demolition of the existing gas-to-energy facility structures and the construction of both temporary and permanent collocated wireless telecommunication facilities at the closed Coyote Canyon Landfill gas-to-energy facility site. The project site is located at the top of a hill in an open space area near Sage Hill School. AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless all maintain existing facilities at the project site with antennas collocated on a 105-foot-high exhaust stack. The exhaust stack will be demolished, which necessitates the removal of existing wireless telecommunications facility antennas attached to it. A conditional use permit is requested to allow the construction of two collocated 65-foot-high faux eucalyptus trees, which will serve as permanent wireless telecommunications facilities for the four carriers. A limited term permit is requested to construct two collocated temporary wireless telecommunications facilities during construction of the faux trees to avoid a disruption in service. 3. The subject property is located within the Open Space (OS) Zoning District and the General Plan Land Use Element category is Open Space (OS). 4. The subject property is not located within the coastal zone. 5. A public hearing was held on September 22, 2016, in the Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and purpose of the public hearing was given in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the Planning Commission at this public hearing. 39 Planning Commission Resolution No. #### Page 2 of 2 SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DETERMINATION. 1. Pursuant to Section 15270 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves are not subject to CEQA review. SECTION 3. REQUIRED FINDINGS. In accordance with Chapter 20.49 (Wireless Telecommunications Facilities) of the Zoning Code, a Class 4 (Freestanding wireless telecommunications facility installation may be established subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. The Planning Commission may approve a conditional use permit only after making each of the five required findings set forth in Section 20.52.020(F) (Conditional Use Permits and Minor Use Permits — Findings and Decision) as well as those in Section 20.49.060 (Wireless Telecommunications Facilities — Permit Review Procedures). In this case, the Planning Commission was unable to make the required findings based upon the following: SECTION 4. DECISION. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach hereby denies Conditional Use Permit No. UP2016-024 and Limited Term Permit No. XP2016-007. 2. This action shall become final and effective 14 days following the date this Resolution was adopted unless within such time an appeal is filed with the City Clerk in accordance with the provisions of Title 20 (Planning and Zoning), of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2016. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: BY: Kory Kramer, Chairman BY: Peter Zak, Secretary 05-26-2016 40 Attachment No. PC 3 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 41 V� QP �P ��W,po S T Public Review Draft — August 2016 C� P NCl FO FN Coyote Canyon Landfill Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update (PA2016-091) INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Prepared by: OC Waste & Recycling County of Orange 4� PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Coyote Canyon Landfill Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update LEAD AGENCY: City of Newport Beach Community Development Department, Planning Division 100 Civic Center Drive PO Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658 (949) 644-3253 Contact: Benjamin M. Zdeba,AICP, Associate Planner PREPARED BY: OC Waste &Recycling(i.e., County of Orange) 300 N. Flower Street, Suite 400 Santa Ana, CA 92703 (714) 834-4107 Contact: John Arnau, CEQA Manager August 2016 44 TABLE OF CONTENTS INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY.......................................................................................................................1 1.1 PROJECT TITLE.........................................................................................................................................1 1.2 PROJECT APPLICANTS............................................................................................................................1 1.3 PROJECT LOCATION...............................................................................................................................1 1.4 EXISTING CONDITIONS..........................................................................................................................1 1.5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION..........................................................................................................................8 1.6 RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES.....................................................................................................................17 1.7 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS .....................................................................................................................17 1.8 PROJECT REVIEW AND DECISION.....................................................................................................22 1.9 DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.............................................................................24 2.0 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST QUESTIONS.....................................................25 I. AESTHETICS........................................................................................................................................25 II. AGRICULTURE&FORESTRY RESOURCES..................................................................................31 III. AIR QUALITY......................................................................................................................................32 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES...............................................................................................................35 V. CULTURAL/SCIENTIFIC RESOURCES............................................................................................41 VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. .....................................................................................................................45 VH. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS......................................................................................................50 VIII. HAZARDS&HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.......................................................................................52 IX. HYDROLOGY&WATER QUALITY................................................................................................57 X. LAND USE AND PLANNING-........ ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ................61 XI. MINERAL RESOURCES.....................................................................................................................64 XII. NOISE. ..................................................................................................................................................64 XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING..........................................................................................................71 XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES. ............................................................................................................................72 XV. RECREATION......................................................................................................................................73 XVI. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC..........................................................................................................74 XVII. UTILITIES&SERVICE SYSTEMS....................................................................................................78 XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS..................................................................................................................80 3.0 INVENTORY OF MITIGATON MEASURES.........................................................................................82 4.0 REPORT PREPARERS.............................................................................................................................84 APPENDICES Page i 45 INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM AND ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION This environmental document is an Initial Study. The Initial Study was prepared for the proposed project by the Lead Agency as a means to identify any significant environmental effects and to determine whether an Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration should be prepared. LI PROJECT TITLE Coyote Canyon Landfill Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update 1.2 PROJECT APPLICANTS The project applicants for the proposed project are Sprint, AT&T, Verizon Wireless, T-Mobile (cell carriers) and Fortistar (demolition of gas-to-energy facility structures). 1.3 PROJECT LOCATION The project site is the landfill gas-to-energy facility located at 20662 Newport Coast Drive, Newport Beach. The location of the project site is shown on Figure 1. 1.4 EXISTING CONDITIONS The closed Coyote Canyon Landfill is located at 20661 Newport Coast Drive in the City of Newport Beach. The landfill site is owned by the County of Orange and maintained by OC Waste &Recycling, the County's solid waste landfill department. The landfill operated from 1963 to 1990. The landfill site consists of four areas, including the main canyon landfill, located immediately west of Newport Coast Drive and north of San Joaquin Hills Road. The east and south canyon landfilling areas, as well as the landfill gas-to-energy facility site, are all located immediately east of Newport Coast Drive, across the street from the main canyon landfill. The location of the landfill gas-to-energy facility site, which is the project site, is shown on Figure 1. All of the landfill areas including the project site are shown on Figure 2. The project site is a 4.14-acre project site. The project site is situated on a ridge at an elevation of approximately 780 feet above mean sea level. The site is relatively flat, but there is a drop in elevation around the site on three sides. On the eastern side of the site, elevations rise to the next hill. The general topographic gradient for the area appears to be falling to the northwest, although there are numerous local variations due to the hill and canyon topography in the area. At the project site, the topographical gradient is slightly falling to the north (GRS, 1993). Land uses that are immediately adjacent to the project site include the landfill areas described above, an Irvine Ranch Water District water pumping station and designated open space. In addition, Sage Hill High School is located immediately north of the east canyon landfill area. The closest homes to the project site are located along the northerly end of Arbella, Marisol, Renata, and Portica streets, approximately 1,283 feet south of the project site, as shown on Figure 2. A representative view of the project site from these closest homes is shown on Figure Page 1 40 3, taken from Renata. In addition, Sage Hill High School is approximately 1,500 feet north of the project site and Newport Coast Elementary School is approximately 1,875 feet southwest of the project site. In addition, the Newport Coast Community Center is approximately 1,575 feet southwest of the project site, as shown on Figure 2. Other local land uses near the project site include the Newport Coast Shopping Center located southwest of the Newport Coast Community Center and the Newport Coast Community Park located west of the Newport Coast Community Center. In addition, the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor(i.e., SR-73), located immediately north of Sage Hills High School. North of SR-73, there are residential areas in the City of Irvine (i.e., Turtle Ridge)that have views of the project site. The 4.14-acre project site consists of structures associated with a landfill gas-to-energy facility that was operated from 1988 to December 2015. The facility received landfill gas from the adjacent Coyote Canyon Landfill and converted it to electricity. The landfill gas was dewatered, compressed, entrained with oil, and used as an energy source to heat a boiler which generated steam to drive a turbine generator (GRS, 2004). The facility has five buildings as well as numerous other supporting structures on-site, which are shown on Figure 4. In addition to the five buildings on the project site, the major features of the facility include the following: a boiler and dilution fan structure, five pad-mounted transformers, a generator breaker, a cooling tower structure, landfill gas blowers, four flares for burning excess landfill gas, a storage area and an exhaust stack associated with the steam plant. In addition, there are several above ground storage tanks located on the project site.' There is also a 105-foot high exhaust stack that is the dominant visual feature on the site, as shown on Figure 3. Attached to the 105-foot high exhaust stack are four wireless communication facilities with associated infrastructure that is attached to the perimeter wall. The landfill gas-to-energy facility was constructed in 1987 and began operation in 1988. The facility converted landfill gasZ that is generated by the landfill into electricity. The facility was privately owned and operated by GRS and then by Fortistar. In December 2015, Fortistar closed the facility since the landfill was no longer producing enough landfill gas for the facility to remain economically viable. Since that time, the County has been flaring the collected landfill gas, in compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and Local Enforcement Agency(LEA) regulations. The project site is completely paved and is surrounded by a 12-foot high perimeter wall, which has a front gate that is locked when facility personnel are not on-site. All of the landfill gas-to- energy structures are located inside the perimeter wall. The wall is surrounded by tall trees that are an estimated 20 to 60 feet in height. These trees are all non-native, ornamental trees that are primarily eucalyptus blue gum (Eucalyptus globulus)trees. The perimeter wall and tall trees were installed to screen the landfill gas-to-energy facility structures from nearby residential areas in both Newport Beach and Irvine. Phase L Environmental Site Assessment, 20662 Newport Coast Drive, Parcel 4, Gas Recovery Systems,Newport Beach, Orange County, CA,Geosyntec Consultants,p. 5, September 2006 z Landfill gas is a complex mix of different gases created by the actions of microorganisms within a landfill during the process of waste decomposition. Landfill gas is approximately forty to sixty percent methane,with the remainder being mostly carbon monoxide. Page 2 47 This page was intentionally left blank. Page 3 42 FIGURE 1 Page 4 0 �q G Univ Or Caf fom,a Imre Bonita Canyon Irvine San Joaquin Hills site San Newport Beach --- _ l - i r !t Figure I Site Location Map Newport Coast Newport Beach, California nN /V 2.000 1,000 0 2,000 00091 Feet FIGURE 2 Page 5 51 A, t � z XFse •. 10 l o eta �tiw �- • ..�s ' � � ��:, (�- ,. „ 5`'• �na;r: ' SAGE LL HIGM) L. . C� esti CLOSED` OYOTE CANYON LAND. L C ON ON �. EAS CP�O•� 0 � o 1 PROJECT - .elf. . �� � � ` � _ � ���� � • ' � . SOUTH CANYON . . . i 'Nov � -.:`� � ” /� 5 r r�i. �-► j tl � / -., � NEWPORT COAST ELEMENTARY 1 a{�� •/ G3" 1� iHIPA Nr OOL 1- 7 1 l.1 - Li ,SFT + "�/` ♦ \/ `,r FIGURE 3 Page 6 53 Y �Y t , • or "it , Ar SV ` 4 . 0. lit got 4 r• . • ' x' y �'�' •1 • • •� 1 � y •! � • , kill dP 1 Lill- i FIGURE 4 Page 7 5115 : 7 w J "�- 14 There are gaps between the trees, especially on the western side of the project site. Also, the trees on the eastern side appear more prominent since they are located on a 10-foot high berm. A paved access road to the facility, that is approximately 1,400 feet in length, that is shared with the Irvine Ranch Water District, connects the facility site to Newport Coast Drive, where there is a traffic signal. The perimeter wall and access road were constructed at the same time as the gas- to-energy facility in 1987. The perimeter trees were also planted at the same time. The entire Coyote Canyon Landfill, including the project site, is located within the Central Subregion of the Natural Community Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP) for the Central and Coastal Subregions of Orange County. The NCCP/HCP is a multi-species habitat conservation plan designed to protect sensitive plant and animal species by preserving habitat areas. The project site is located within the NCCP/HCP and is designated as an existing use by the NCCP/HCP. Existing utilities that serve the landfill gas-to-energy facility include a '/2 to 1-inch potable water line, a 6-inch reclaimed water line a 6-inch sewer line with water, reclaimed water and sewer service all provided by the Irvine Ranch Water District. There is a 4-inch natural gas line with service provided by the Southern California Gas Company and a 69kV electrical interconnect with service provided by Southern California Edison. Fire and emergency medical services are provided by the City of Newport Beach Fire Department and police services are provided by the City of Newport Beach Police Department. 1.5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project consists of three components, all of which will occur at the landfill gas-to- energy facility site. These components are the demolition of landfill gas-to-energy facility structures and the construction of temporary and permanent wireless telecommunication facilities. Demolition of Landfill Gas-to-Energy Facility Structures Before any gas-to-energy facility structures are demolished, Fortistar will obtain a demolition permit from the City of Newport Beach, which requires the preparation of a detailed demolition plan. The first component of the project that will occur will be the demolition of structures by Fortistar at the project site. The structures located on the project site are shown on Figure 4. Approximately 80 percent of the existing structures on the project site will be demolished, leaving exposed approximately 0.5 acres of soil at the conclusion of the demolition. The voids left by the removal of the structures will be backfilled with crushed concrete from the site and clean compacted soil. Some of the existing structures will remain, including three existing landfill gas flares and blowers that will continue to flare landfill gas (i.e., a fourth flare is also at the project site but is not operational and will therefore be demolished), structures needed to support the landfill gas collection system infrastructure, as well as existing electrical, water, sewer, natural gas and landfill gas lines. All of the structures that will be demolished and all of the structures that will remain are shown on Figure 5. In addition, the paved access road to the project site as well as the perimeter wall and the tall trees surrounding the perimeter wall will all remain. Page 8 57 One of the last structures that will be demolished is an existing 105-foot high exhaust stack, as shown on Figure 3 and Figure 4. This structure is highly visible in the Newport Coast area and the removal of this structure will result in a significant aesthetic/view benefit to the adjacent community. The reason that this exhaust stack will be one of the last structures to be demolished is to give the carriers enough time to construct temporary wireless telecommunication facilities on the project site which will replace the four existing wireless telecommunication facilities that are currently attached to the exhaust stack. This component of the project is discussed below. Demolition activities are anticipated to begin in October 2016, and conclude by December 31, 2016. Per Newport Beach Municipal Code Section 10.28.040 (Construction Activity—Noise Regulations), demolition activities will occur from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday through Friday; and Saturday from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. No demolition work will be performed on Sundays or on federal holidays. Demolition activities will occur during daylight hours only. Heavy equipment that will be utilized during the demolition effort include the following: 270-ton crane for the removal of the turbine and generator; 170-ton crane with 150 feet of boom for the removal of the 105-foot high exhaust stack; Komatsu 650 excavator with an Allied G130 concrete hammer; 350 Link belt excavator with a G90 concrete hammer and a Labounty MDP 27 universal processor; 966 Cat rubber tired loader; skidsteer loaders; water trucks; 18-wheel semi- end dump trucks and a vibratory sheep's foot compactor. Two large excavators with universal processors (i.e., a grabbing attachment on the excavators used for precise demolition work) will be used for tearing apart the existing structures. Jackhammering will be required to tear apart the concrete pad at the site and concrete breakers will then be used for crushing the demolished concrete. The demolished concrete will then be removed off-site and taken to a recycling facility. The voids left by the removal of the concrete pad will be backfilled with clean compacted soil to 90 percent of maximum density and quality assured. There are certain structures at the gas-to-energy facility that will be sold by the demolition contractor to other gas-to-energy facility operators or for other similar facilities. These structures include the gas turbines, boilers and other structures. These structures will be removed from the site and transported to their end use destinations. Other structures will be dismantled using the two large excavators with the dismantled materials sorted by material type. Materials will then be transported off-site for recycling (i.e., metals and concrete). For the demolition of the 105-foot high exhaust stack, a 170-ton crane with 150 feet of boom will be used to lift off sections of the stack to be lowered to the ground where the universal processors can size the material for trucking and proper off-site disposal. The stack will have some preliminary cuts performed by men on man-lifts, the crane moved in and attached prior to finalizing the cuts, the section lifted off and lowered to the ground and the process will continue until the stack is accessible from ground level. It is anticipated that it will take no more than two days to remove this exhaust stack and the crane will not remain in the air for more than a few hours at a time. Page 9 52 FIGURE 5 Page 10 15 4 CONSTRUCTION NOTES �F\ uulrn r•�. aanrru.roiwY.nx o..nw. PLAN FEATURES KEEP/REMOVE rotrr.•s.ro.eono-.•.n w.u•n�lwreumin vioururs 1.) E GENERATOR REMOVE 2JBCHLERBOLER REMOVE yCT� • n�.rnr YYo-..a.a.•„n 3,)C000NG TOWER REMOVE own.."n.'mw's 4. CONDENSER REMOVE LEGEND 4 n ,- M � ruammueemrrweoo.rn,olwu. 5.)DEAERATOR REMOVE V -• w•oo'ui:;�::�r°"+•.:+iwo1Daunsa n`�Y"" 6.)LOW PRESSURE HEATERS REMOVE .� � we.r.r.r • 7.)HIGH PRESSURE HEATERS REMOVE Irao-rw w..•usw.n r+u..oi..aw ww.e�naw.c.cY B.)FEEDWATER PUMPS REMOVE 1 4 `� 1N ��uu. .rwlYwnulroYvawm 9JCONDENSATE PUMPS REMOVE " s num i la vrn.wen•e�mw.w•omrw 10.)CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK REMOVE `. ,tJ; �saucsr.nu • wumruaw.awna r++an. 11.)COOLING WATER PUMPS REMOVE �.\+ --" • wlw•Awurorweeau...mnrua vNYrsc 12.)CONDENSATE TRANSFER PUMP REMOVE 13.)CIRCULATING WATER PUMP REMOVE y +�.,+ ` w�•umwnwY.winllrour•.w..rn.uu 14.) FIRE PUMP SAID REMOVE y .•�0 W 4WI611 r.u.YYY C(YMC�l01Yq >) Ywrlro- w���� 15.) OEMINERALIZER REMOVE �� ^^'°^�+"' I6.) WASTE NEUTRALIZATION TANK KEEP •i \\ - l 17.) CAUSTIC TANK KEEP 18.) AGO TANK REMOVE 19.) EMERGENCY GENERATOR KEEP 20.)LUBE OIL EQUIPMENT REMOVE Bt; / 21.) AIR COMPRESSOR SKID KEEP / 1 _ 22.)MAIN TRANSFORMER KEEP I 23.)GENERATOR BREAKER KEEP / a24, TRANSFORMERS KEEP 25.) CONTROL BUILDING KEEP ,\ \ 26.) LTG BLOWERS KEEP 27.) FLARES KEEP 28.) GL/WATER SEPARATOR REMOVE 29) STEAM SILENCER REMOVE 30.) OFFICE BUILDING REMOVE r . /\ 31.) EXHAUST STACK REMOVE \\ \C %� 'x • O.. 32.) AMBIENT VAPORIZER PIT REMOVE 33.) ELECTRICAL MANHOLES KEEP 34.) ELECTRICAL PANEL KEEP 35.) VER20N CONTROL PANEL KEEP \ 7 36.) CONTROL PANEL KEEP I-M 37.) T-MOBLIELIC CONTROL PANEL KEEP / �� d 38.) SPRINT CONTROL PANEL KEEP \Q7 C THIS SECTION OF ROAD Will BE REMOVED 39.) EXIST. CELLULAR INFRASTRUCTURE KEEP �\ .. 40.) EXIST. ROAD KEEP 41.J STORE ROOM REMOVE X60 ++�: �� 42.) SHOP BUILDING REMOVE y, 43.) FIREWALL REMOVE 44.) LNG TRAILER STALL REMOVE �� �a � 45. FIRC HYDRANT KEEP ,{ 46. NATURAL GAS CONNECTION KEEP 47.) PROPANE TANK KEEP \ r 48.) CONDENSATE TANK KEEP l 49.) AIR COMPRESSOR REMOVE 50.) LIMIT OF WORK 51.) CONCRETE SWALE AND OLTLFT KEEP WITH BMPS. SEE SWPPP. 52.) EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND KEEP WATER SERVICE TO BE CAPPED 53.) LTG SUPPLY TO POWER PLANT BUND OFF 54.) OPERATIONS BUILDING KEEP OC WASTE&RECYCLING FOHrINTAR MMVx GMUP : CB&I Environmental& COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL Infrastructure, Inc. �=`wnr t-..w Uv•K..p�t . COYOTE CANYON ENERGY LLC IA WYI):IJI)1+4u 10101 r:1.)•.e SWPPP B(SI MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Figure 5- Project Site Structures to be Demolished And Structures that will Remain 60 This page was intentionally left blank. Page 11 01 Approximately 10,000 cubic yards of clean soil will be imported during demolition and will be used along with the crushed concrete for backfill into the voids left by the removal of the structures. Since each soil truck can carry approximately 10 cubic yards of soil, approximately 1,000 two-way trips will be distributed over a three month period. Assuming 25 work days per month and a three month demolition schedule, the demolition component would generate approximately 14 two-way imported soil trips per day. For the estimated 14,360 square feet of structures that will be demolished, it is estimated that this will generate approximately 4 two-way truck trips per day over the three month demolition schedule. All demolition vehicle trips will be staggered over the entire working day. The City of Newport Beach requires as part of its demolition permit process that at least 50 percent of all demolished materials be recycled for demolition projects located in the City. For the proposed project, almost all of the demolished materials will be recycled, with the exception of the administrative building trailer and the cooling towers. Metals will be transported to Corridor Recycling in the City of Long Beach, or similar facility and the demolished concrete will be transported to the Ewles Materials recycling facility in the City of Irvine or similar facility. Access from the project site to Corridor Recycling (located at 22500 South Alameda Street, Long Beach) will be Newport Coast Drive, SR-73, 405 Freeway and South Alameda Street. Access from the project site to the Ewles Materials recycling facility (located at 16081 Construction Circle West, Irvine) will be Newport Coast Drive, SR-73, 55 Freeway, 405 Freeway, Jamboree Road, Barranca Parkway and Construction Circle West. Solid waste materials, which will include insulation, aluminum, gypsum, sheet metal and wood waste will be disposed at the Frank R. Bowerman Landfill in Irvine, which is owned and operated by the County. Access from the project site to the Frank R. Bowerman Landfill (located at 11002 Bee Canyon Access Road, Irvine) will be Newport Coast Drive, SR-73, SR-133, 5 Freeway, Sand Canyon Avenue and Bee Canyon Access Road. It is estimated that there will be no more than 75 two-way vehicle trips per day for all demolition of structures and wireless telecommunication facilities construction activities, which include all two-way trips from vehicles transporting demolished materials from the site,heavy construction equipment transported to the site, material delivery trips and construction worker commuting trips. Construction of Temporary Wireless Telecommunication Facilities Currently, attached to the existing 105-foot high exhaust stack are four existing antenna arrays that provide cellular coverage to the Newport Coast area. The four carriers that own these antenna arrays are Sprint, AT&T, Verizon Wireless and T-Mobile. Prior to the demolition of the 105-foot high exhaust stack, all four carriers will need to construct two collocated temporary wireless telecommunication facilities at the project site in order to provide for the continuation of existing cellular service without interruption. Once the two collocated temporary wireless telecommunication facilities have been constructed and are operational, the existing antenna arrays attached to the 105-foot high exhaust stack will be removed, prior to the demolition of the exhaust stack. Page 12 02 There will be two collocated temporary wireless telecommunication facilities that will both be 65 feet in height to the tallest point. Sprint and AT&T will have one temporary wireless telecommunication facility and Verizon Wireless and T-Mobile will have the other temporary wireless telecommunication facility. Both facilities will have two antenna arrays attached each. For the Sprint and AT&T facility, the top of the Sprint antenna array will be at 65 feet and the top of the AT&T antenna array will be at 56 feet. For the Verizon and T-Mobile facility, the top of the T-Mobile antenna array will be at 65 feet and the top of the Verizon antenna array will be at 54 feet. The location of the two proposed facilities on the project site are shown on Figure 6. Currently, Sprint, AT&T and Verizon Wireless have existing power units located on the project site that provide power to their existing antenna arrays and will continue to provide power for both the proposed temporary and permanent facilities at the project site. T-Mobile's current power supply is located near the base of the 105-foot high exhaust stack and will need to be removed prior to the demolition of this exhaust stack. T-Mobile will install a new power supply that will support both its proposed temporary and permanent facilities that will be shared with Verizon. In addition, Verizon Wireless will be modifying its existing site on the perimeter wall that includes removing and replacing two panel antennas and the installation of two remote radio heads behind existing antennas. Sprint will be modifying one of its exterior sectors as well (also attached to the perimeter wall), which includes replacing one panel antenna, replacing one remote radio head, adding two remote radio heads and adding one combiner. A remote radio head is an interface between the fiber cables and the antennas. The combiner combines different frequencies into a single antenna. The two facilities will have different designs,with the Sprint and AT&T temporary wireless telecommunication facility being a "flower pot"type (i.e., a concrete base that sits on top of the ground), similar to the facility shown on Figure 7, and that of the Verizon—T-Mobile being a "cell blocks" facility, similar to the facility shown on Figure 8. The construction of the temporary wireless telecommunication facilities will take approximately two months before they are operational and can begin providing cellular coverage. The temporary facilities will only be operational at the project site until the permanent facilities are constructed and are operational, which will occur in the fall of 2017, after the completion of the migratory bird nesting season, which is from February 15 to August 31. Once the permanent facilities are operational, the temporary facilities will be removed from the project site. The construction of the temporary wireless telecommunication facilities will occur during Fortistar's demolition activities. OC Waste & Recycling, Fortistar and the four carriers will work in close coordination to ensure that there are no conflicts between the demolition of the gas-to-energy facility structures and the construction of the temporary wireless telecommunication facilities. It is estimated that the maximum number of truck trips for both the demolition activities and the construction of the wireless telecommunication facilities will be 75 two-way vehicle trips at the site per day. These trips will be staggered over the entire working day. Ensuring a safe working area will also be an important consideration for this concurrent demolition and construction effort. Construction of the Sprint and AT&T temporary wireless telecommunication facilities will include equipment staging, between the flare control cabinet and the blast wall, for Page 13 63 FIGURE 6 Page 14 04 i N,' verizoW i t _ - _ •.\ HOf LrV NUMGrtURO V R"O]R ♦, 11VM[U0.° /i i Q ♦ SEQUOIA T--Mobile- -.01 ��' •.\ � NEWPORT RIDGE �' '•� �� i Lis sa,.o°s`enD '\ P it mw ravwnrcws,on x[wvva,erwa..Uw.r '• `� uonos�cR.mw ENLARGED •^"�'^'�• `'� SITE PLAN ENLARGED SITE PIAN ," ° 1O "`�• Figure 6— Location of Temporary and Permanent qIERI Sprint—AT&T—Temporary Wireless sari Sprint—AT&T—Permanent Wireless Wireless Telecommunication Facilities at Project Site Telecommunication Facility Telecommunication Facility Verizon—T-Mobile—Temporary Wireless 4w Verizon—T-Mobile—Peryiwent Wireless Telecommunication Facility Telecommunication Facili ), This page was intentionally left blank. Page 15 00 approximately one week; delivery of the flower pot structure using a crane and semi-truck over three days; trenching and conduit installation from the perimeter wall to the flower pot structure using a drill rig and backhoe over three days; microwave dish installation and alignment with a boom truck (i.e., crane truck) over one day; and cables installation and antennas relocation to the flower pot including decommissioning of existing antennas and otherwise radio frequency material from the 105-foot high exhaust stack, which will require the use of a boom truck over a three day period. Construction of the temporary wireless telecommunication facilities for Verizon Wireless and T- Mobile will include equipment staging, between the flare control cabinet and the blast wall, for approximately two weeks. The pole/cell blocks structure will be delivered and unloaded at the site using a crane,petty-bone forklift and semi-trucks/other vehicles. Over a one-week period, the excavation for the conduits and ground-ring will be performed using a drill rig and backhoe as well as the installation of the cell blocks and pole and the completion of the lines, antennas and microwave. The testing of the lines will be performed with a boom truck and a crew. One week will also be needed for the decommissioning of the existing T-Mobile site support equipment and the decommissioning of the T-Mobile equipment and Verizon Wireless equipment on the exhaust stack. Construction and Operation of Permanent Collocated Wireless Telecommunication Facilities Once the two temporary wireless telecommunication facilities are operational, and after all demolition activities are complete, the four carriers will begin work on the construction of the permanent collocated wireless telecommunication facilities, in the fall of 2017, after the completion of the migratory bird nesting season which is from February 15 to August 31. There will be two permanent collocated facilities that will both be 65 feet in height to the tallest point. Sprint and AT&T will have one permanent collocated facility and Verizon Wireless and T- Mobile will have the other permanent collocated facility. Both facilities will have two antenna arrays attached each. For the Sprint and AT&T facility, the top of the Sprint antenna array will be at 61 feet, 8 inches and the top of the AT&T antenna array will be at 52 feet, four inches. For the Verizon and T-Mobile facility, the top of the T-Mobile antenna array will be at 65 feet and the top of the Verizon antenna array will be at 54 feet. The location of the two proposed permanent facilities on the project site are shown on Figure 6. The two permanent wireless communication facilities will be designed to blend in with the adjacent tall trees that currently surround the perimeter wall that surrounds the project site. A representative photo of this type of permanent wireless telecommunication facility is shown on Figure 9. It is anticipated that the permanent facilities will take approximately three months to construct and are anticipated to be operational in December 2017, at which time the temporary facilities will be removed from the project site. Construction of the Sprint and AT&T permanent collocated wireless telecommunication facility will include equipment staging on-site in the area where the cooling tower is located, which will be one of the first structures to be demolished, for approximately two months; ground ring trenching and conduits over a three day period using a drill rig and backhoe; drilling of the foundation hole (estimated at 20-30 feet in depth) using a drill rig over one day; installation of the foundation cage using a crane and inspection using a boom truck over one week; pouring of Page 16 67 the foundation concrete with cement trucks and inspection over one week; curing time and steel tower delivery over two weeks; steel tower installation using a crane over one week, and use of a boom truck to complete lines and antennas on the tower with testing of equipment; antenna relocations to the new tower including dish alignment using a boom truck over one week; and installation of the faux branches and inspection. Construction of the permanent collocated wireless telecommunication facility for Verizon Wireless and T-Mobile will include equipment staging on-site in the area where the office trailer is located, which will be one of the first structures to be demolished, for approximately three months; ground ring trenching and conduits over a three day period using a drill rig and backhoe; drilling of the foundation hole (estimated at 20-30 feet in depth) using a drill rig over one day; installation of the foundation cage using a crane and inspection using a boom truck over one week; pouring of the foundation concrete with cement trucks and inspection over one week; curing time and steel tower delivery over three weeks; steel tower installation using a crane over one week, and use of a boom truck to complete lines and antennas on the tower with testing of equipment over one week; antenna relocations to the new tower including dish alignment using a boom truck over one week; and installation of the faux branches and inspection. 1.6 RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES The City of Newport Beach is the Lead Agency under CEQA for this project. The County of Orange is the Responsible Agency for the project, since the County owns the property. The four cell carriers will be required to submit detailed plans for both the temporary (Class 5 — Temporary) and permanent (Class 4—Freestanding Structure) collocated wireless telecommunications facilities. Sprint, AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile and Fortistar(i.e., the Project Applicants) will prepare one combined conditional use permit application that will be submitted to the City of Newport Beach. The conditional use permit application and all supporting plans and documentation will then go before the City of Newport Beach Planning Commission for its consideration. If the Planning Commission approves the project, all four carriers will be issued individual building permits. Fortistar must obtain a Demolition Permit from the City of Newport Beach. In addition, Fortistar must obtain a Notice of Intent (NOf) for Construction Activities under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems Permit (NPDES), issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region (RWQCB). 1.7 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The State CEQA Guidelines require the preparation of an Initial Study (IS)/Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) if the IS prepared for a project identifies potentially significant effects, but (1) revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant before an IS/MND and Initial Study are released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur and (2) there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the Lead Agency, that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15070[b]). Page 17 02 FIGURE 7 Page 18 �q e i .. owl .40 slim FIGURE 8 Page 19 72 WW'R � Figure 8—Cell Blocks Temporary Wireless Telecommunication Facility FIGURE 9 Page 20 73 •t I ++ J,. 1 iii 'r`� •f. '�. i t p.' Celt RM, ETIT"m N, r �t?: i'- 'S° - • � ';,' q •,� R `•gin Yr , # •. .yam � .; �. sem/.• , .. ,� r a i- - This page was intentionally left blank. Page 21 715 Based on the environmental checklist form prepared for the proposed Project and supporting environmental analysis (provided in Section 2.0 of this IS/MND), with implementation of applicable regulations and standard conditions, the Project would have no impact or less than significant impacts on the following environmental issue areas: aesthetics, agriculture and forestry resources, air quality, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, mineral resources, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, and utilities and service systems. The proposed Project's impacts on the following issue areas would be less than significant with the implementation of project-specific mitigation measures: biological resources, cultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, and transportation and traffic. All impacts would be less than significant after mitigation. According to the State CEQA Guidelines, it is appropriate for the City to adopt an IS/MND for the proposed Project because, with the incorporation of recommended mitigation measures, the proposed Project's potentially significant environmental impacts would be eliminated or reduced to levels considered less than significant. 1.8 PROJECT REVIEW AND DECISION This Initial Study(IS) has been prepared pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Guidelines, as amended. Although this Initial Study has been prepared with consultant support, all analyses, conclusions, findings and determinations made herein represent the position of the City of Newport Beach acting as the Lead Agency for CEQA compliance. Notices of the availability of the IS and the proposed IS/MND for review and comment have been posted at the Project site and at the City of Newport Beach Community Development Department. In addition, notice of the public review period will occur via publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the Project area. The environmental documentation is also available for review on the City's website: http://www.newportbeachca.gov/cegadocuments and at the following locations: • City of Newport Beach Community Development Department 100 Civic Center Drive Bay B Newport Beach, California 92660 (949) 644-3309 Hours: 7:30 AM to 5:30 PM Monday through Thursday 7:30 AM to 4:30 PM Friday • Newport Beach Central Library 1000 Avocado Avenue Newport Beach, California 92660 (949) 717-3800 Hours: 9:00 AM to 9:00 PM Monday through Thursday 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM Friday and Saturday 12:00 PM to 5:00 PM Sunday Page 22 � • Newport Beach Library,Balboa Branch 100 East Balboa Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92661 (949) 644-3076 Hours: 9:00 AM to 9:00 PM Monday and Wednesday 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM Tuesday and Thursday to Saturday Closed Sundays • Newport Beach Library, Mariners Branch 1300 Irvine Avenue Newport Beach, California 92660 (949) 717-3838 Hours: 9:00 AM to 9:00 PM Monday through Thursday 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM Friday and Saturday 12:00 PM to 5:00 PM Sunday • Newport Beach Library, Corona del Mar Branch 420 Marigold Avenue Newport Beach, California 92625 (949) 644-3075 Hours: 9:00 AM to 9:00 PM Tuesday and Thursday 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM Wednesday, Friday and Saturday Closed Sundays and Mondays A 30-day public review period has been established for the IS/MND, in accordance with Section 15073 of the State CEQA Guidelines. In reviewing the IS/MND, affected public agencies and interested members of the public should focus on the adequacy of the document in identifying and analyzing the potential environmental impacts and the ways in which the potentially significant effects of the Project can be avoided or mitigated. Comments on the IS/MND and the analysis contained herein may be sent to: Benjamin M. Zdeba, AICP Associate Planner City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, California 92660 bzdeba(a)newportbeachca.gov Following receipt and evaluation of comments from agencies, organizations, and/or individuals, the City of Newport Beach will determine whether any substantial new environmental issues have been raised or substantial comments have been provided that would require revisions to the IS/MND document. If so, further documentation may be required. If not, the City may adopt the finalized IS/MND. The proposed Project and the adequacy of this IS/MND will be considered by the Planning Commission at a public hearing anticipated to be held on September 22, 2016, in the City Page 23 77 Council Chambers, 100 Civic Center Drive,Newport Beach, CA 92660. If the Planning Commission approves the Project and certifies the IS/MND, they will adopt findings relative to the Project's environmental effects as disclosed in the IS/MND and a Notice of Determination (NOD)will be filed with the Orange County Clerk. l.9 DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE In preparation of this IS/MND, relevant documents have been cited and incorporated, in accordance with Sections 15148 and 15150 of the State CEQA Guidelines. The following reports and/or studies are applicable to the proposed Project and are hereby incorporated by reference. • City of Newport Beach General Plan, City of Newport Beach, adopted July 25,2006. • City of Newport Beach General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH [State Clearinghouse]No. 2006011119), certified July 2006. • City of Newport Beach Municipal Code, which includes the City of Newport Beach Zoning Code (Title 20). • Status Assessment of Cultural Resources within the Coyote Canyon Landfill, November 2014. • Final Closure Plan for the Coyote Canyon Sanitary Landfall, June 1990. • Phase I Environmental Assessment, 20662 Newport Coast Drive, Parcel 4, September 2006. • Combined Semi-Annual Water Quality Management Monitoring Report (October 2015 — March 2016) and Constituents of Concern Testing Report (October 2011 —March 2016) and Annual Summary Report (April 2015 —March 2016), Coyote Canyon Landfill, April 2016. These reports/studies are available for review at the City of Newport Beach Community Development Department (refer to address and hours provided above). Some are also available on the City's website at http://www.newportbeachea.gov/government/departrnents/community- development/planning-division/general-plan-codes-and-regulations. a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. Page 24 72 2.0 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST QUESTIONS This section of the Initial Study analyzes the potential for significant environmental impacts that may result from the demolition of structures and the construction of temporary and permanent wireless telecommunication facilities at the closed Coyote Canyon Landfill gas-to-energy facility site. The format for this analysis is based on the enclosed Environmental Checklist. For the evaluation of potential impacts, the questions in the checklist are stated and an answer is provided reflecting the analysis conducted for each potential impact. To each question, there are four possible responses: i) No Impact — The proposed project will not have a measurable impact on the environment. ii) Less Than Signifcant Impact — The proposed project will have the potential for impacting the environment but at a level less than the significance criteria used to evaluate the impact. iii) Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated—The proposed project will have a significant impact unless mitigation measures are implemented to reduce the impact to a less than significant level. iv) Potentially Significant Impact— The proposed project will have impacts considered significant and either (1) additional analysis is needed to identify specific mitigation measures to reduce this impact to a less than significant level, (2) feasible mitigation measures are not available to reduce this impact to a less than significant level, or (3) the impacts associated with the project are not known at this time and further analysis is needed. In these cases, preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required. I. AESTHETICS. Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact AESTHETICS—Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings X within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality X of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which X would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Page 25q Impact Analysis Would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Finding: No Impact The project site is not located within a scenic vista. The City of Newport Beach designates scenic coastal vistas, which includes Newport Coast from Pelican Hill Road North to Coast Highway3, but that is well south of the project site. b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? Finding: No Impact The project site does not include scenic resources, including, but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings or historic buildings within a state scenic highway. The project site does not have any historic buildings. In addition, the project site is completely paved and does not contain any on-site trees or rock outcroppings. C. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Finding: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Visual resources are an important component of the quality of life of any geographic area. As users experience a place, their primary sensory interaction with that place is visual in nature, and a wide variety of shapes, colors, and textures, composed of topography, structures, roadways, and vegetation, forms the views of and from the City. The City of Newport Beach is sited on a coastal plain and is bounded on three sides by developed urban lands of Huntington Beach, Costa Mesa, and Irvine. The rolling green hills of Crystal Cove State Park create views to the cast and form the City boundary at the east, while the Pacific Ocean fills the views to the southwest. Development in Newport Beach has been designed to capture views of the ocean, capitalizing on the ridgelines and hillsides as vantage points. The Upper and Lower Newport Bay, draining an area of 118 square miles via the San Diego Creek and Santa Ana Delhi Channel, bisects the City, and creates a dominant physical land feature that includes estuaries, beaches, the harbor, coastal bluffs and meandering waterways unique to Newport Beach. From the higher elevations in the City, views to the north include the San Joaquin Hills and, in the distance, the Santa Ana Mountains. This combination of hills, canyons, bluffs and water features create a visually dynamic landscape.4 s City of Newport Beach General Plan Update EIR,p.4.1-9,July 2006. Ibid.,p.4.1-1. Page 26 80 Slopes rising up from coastal plains provide a dramatic contrast to the generally flat topography at the coastline and visually dominate the majority of the relatively low-scale urban development at the beachfront. Canyons and gullies formed by water coursing from the mountains to the ocean similarly provide stunning contrast to the coastal tidelands and beaches. The majority of the undeveloped headlands lie in the eastern portion of the City in the area known as Newport Coast/Ridge. The protected canyons, hills, and bluffs of the eastern portion of the City are also recognized for their scenic quality. Topographic landforms of the Newport Coast and Newport Ridge contribute significantly to the aesthetic quality that residents value.6 The project site is zoned OS (Open Space) and is designated OS (Open Space) in the General Plan Land Use Element. The General Plan protects open spaces through land use and natural resources policies, and thus, the existing aesthetic qualities of the open space areas of the City are maintained. For example, General Plan Land Use Policy LU 1.3 protects the natural setting that contributes to the character and identity of Newport Beach and the sense of place it provides for its residents and visitors. This policy aims to preserve open space resources, beaches, harbor, parks, bluffs, preserves and estuaries as visual, recreational and habitat resources. Policy LU 1.6 requires public views, including scenic and visual resources such as open space, mountains, canyons, ridges, the ocean, and the harbor, be preserved and where possible, enhanced from public vantage points.7 In addition, Natural Resources Goal NR 21 is to minimize visual impacts of signs and utilities, and Policy NR 21.1 states that signs, utilities and antennas shall be sited and designed to minimize visual impacts! The project site is situated on a ridge at an elevation of approximately 780 feet above mean sea level. The site is relatively flat, but there is a drop in elevation around the site on three sides. On the eastern side of the site, elevations rise to the next hill. The general topographic gradient for the area appears to be falling to the northwest, although there are numerous local variations due to the hill and canyon topography in the area. At the project site, the topographical gradient is slightly falling to the north(GRS, 1993). The project site is completely paved and is surrounded by a 12-foot high perimeter wall, which has a front gate that is locked when facility personnel are not on-site. All of the landfill gas-to- energy structures are located inside the perimeter wall. The wall is surrounded by tall trees that are an estimated 20 to 60 feet in height, as shown on Figure 4. These trees are non-native, ornamental trees. The perimeter wall and tall trees were installed in 1987 at the same time that the gas-to-energy facility was constructed to visually screen the landfill gas-to-energy facility structures from nearby residential areas in both Newport Beach and Irvine. There are gaps between the trees, especially on the western side of the project site. Also,the trees on the eastern side appear more prominent since they are located on a 10-foot high berm. The closed Coyote Canyon Landfill consists of the main canyon landfill (located west of Newport Coast Drive and north of San Joaquin Hills Road), and the east and south canyon landfill areas (located east of Newport Coast Drive), as well as the landfill gas-to-energy facility Ibid.,p.4.1-10. e Ibid.,p.4.1-12. Ibid.,p.4.1-20. $Ibid.,p.4.1-37. Page 27 81 site (located between the east and south canyon landfilling areas). The location of the landfill gas-to-energy facility site, which is the project site, is shown on Figure 1. All of the landfill areas including the project site are shown on Figure 2. Land uses that are immediately adjacent to the project site include the landfill areas described above, an Irvine Ranch Water District water pumping station and designated open space. In addition, Sage Hill High School is located immediately north of the east canyon landfill area. The closest homes to the project site, that have direct views of the project site looking to the north, are located along the northerly end of Arbella, Marisol,Renata, and Portica streets, approximately 1,283 feet south of the project site, as shown on Figure 2. A representative view of the project site from these closest homes is shown on Figure 3, taken from Renata. In addition, Sage Hill High School is approximately 1,500 feet north of the project site and Newport Coast Elementary School is approximately 1,875 feet southwest of the project site. In addition, the Newport Coast Community Center is approximately 1,575 feet southwest of the project site, as shown on Figure 2. Other local land uses near the project site include the Newport Coast Shopping Center located southwest of the Newport Coast Community Center and the Newport Coast Community Park located west of the Newport Coast Community Center. In addition, the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor(SR-73) is located immediately north of Sage Hills High School. North of SR-73, there are residential areas in the City of Irvine (i.e., Turtle Ridge) that have views of the project site, looking southward. The project site is visible from all of these adjacent land uses due to the fact that the project site is located on a ridge with a 105-foot high exhaust stack. A Tree Health Assessment Report was prepared for the non-native trees surrounding the perimeter wall at the project site. These non-native trees, as shown on Figure 4, were installed in 1987 during the construction of the gas-to-energy facility in order to provide visual screening of the gas-to-energy facility from views in Newport Coast and other land uses located near the project site. The Tree Health Assessment Report, which is included as Appendix A, inventoried and evaluated 355 trees along the perimeter of the gas-to-energy facility site. The inventoried trees comprise four genera, with 193 trees identified as Myoporum (Myoporum laetum), 141 trees identified as eucalyptus trees (Eucalyptus spp.; Red River gum [E. camaldulenis], lemon scented gum [E. citriodora], bushy yate [E. conferruminata], silver dollar gum [E. polyanthemos], and red ironbark [E. sideroxylon]), 18 trees identified as Peruvian pepper (Schinus molle), and 3 trees identified as oak (Quercus sp). The three oak trees are the only native trees. The Tree Health Assessment Report concluded that 67 percent of all of trees surrounding the project site are either dead or are dying and are therefore proposed for removal. In addition, since the project site is located in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, almost all of the remaining trees are proposed for removal, so that they can be replaced with native trees that present a significantly reduced fire risk. Twenty-four (24) healthy trees will be retained that provide important visual screening of the project site. A total of 331 trees will be removed. A Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan has been included as Appendix B. The Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan proposes to remove the existing non-native trees described above and replace them with native trees that will include 12 white alder and western sycamore Page 28 22 trees and 63 coast live oak trees. This will provide effective long-term visual screening of the project site while still maintaining fire safety requirements by maintaining sufficient spacing between tree canopies. The native trees will provide a much lower fire risk when compared to the existing non-native trees. The new trees will also have a dedicated above-ground irrigation line to ensure that the new trees receive sufficient irrigation (i.e., the existing trees do not have a functioning irrigation system). In addition, OC Waste & Recycling will ensure that a qualified habitat maintenance contractor will provide long-term habitat maintenance and monitoring for the new trees. Viewshed simulations of the proposed temporary and permanent wireless telecommunication facilities were performed and are included as Appendix C. As discussed in Section 1.5 Project Description, once the temporary wireless telecommunication facilities are operational, the 105- foot high exhaust tower will be demolished and removed from the project site. However, in order to establish an aesthetics/viewshed baseline for comparison purposes, the viewshed simulations were performed showing the temporary and permanent wireless telecommunication facilities, both with and without the 105-foot high exhaust tower. The temporary wireless telecommunication facilities will be removed from the project site as soon as the permanent wireless telecommunication facilities are operational. The viewshed simulations included as Appendix C were taken from five locations. These locations include the following: (1) looking southeast from Newport Coast Drive (just south of Sage Hill High School), (2) looking northwest from Ridge Park Road and Vista Ridge Road, (3) looking north from Renata, (4) looking northeast from Newport Coast Drive (just northeast of San Joaquin Hills Road) and (5) looking southwest from SR-73. The viewshed simulations show the project site at points in time during the future, which include: (1) showing the project site when all of the non-native trees are removed, (2) showing the project site after the native sycamores, alders and oaks have been growing for five years and (3) when the native sycamores, alders and oaks have reached full maturity. It is anticipated that OC Waste & Recycling will implement the Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan beginning in September 2017. As shown by these viewshed simulations, the proposed 65-foot high temporary and 65-foot high permanent wireless telecommunication facilities at the project site will be highly visible from all of the locations that were selected for the viewshed simulations. The greatest visual impact will occur between the time when all of the non-native trees are removed and before the new native trees have had an opportunity to grow to a sufficient height to provide effective visual screening. However, it is important to note that this impact will be temporary and once the new native trees begin to mature, the new trees will create an aesthetic enhancement when compared to the existing conditions at the project site, which include the following: (1) a 105-foot high white exhaust stack that currently dominates the visual environment in the surrounding community; (2) dead and dying non-native trees that provide only partial screening of the project site, with several gaps in the screening especially along the western and southern sides of the project site; and (3) the non-native trees contrast sharply with the surrounding native habitat. With the proposed project, the 105-foot high white exhaust stack will be removed and the non-native trees will be removed and replaced with the native white alders, western sycamores and coast live oak trees discussed above that will provide an aesthetic enhancement over time, when compared to existing conditions at the project site. Also, the native trees will blend in much easier with the Page 29 tai surrounding native habitat, when compared to the existing trees, providing a more natural appearance. In addition, the permanent wireless telecommunication facilities will be designed to look like trees and will therefore blend in with the new native trees, as the native trees begin to grow and mature. The Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan is included as a mitigation measure for the proposed project. With the implementation of this mitigation measure, the proposed project's potentially significant impacts to aesthetics/views will be reduced to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measures • (MM--1) In order to reduce long-term aesthetics/views impacts to a less than significant level, OC Waste & Recycling will implement a Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan for the proposed project which will remove the majority of the non-native trees that currently surround the project site and replace them with native white alders, western sycamores and coast live oak trees. The new trees will also have a dedicated above- ground irrigation line to ensure that the new trees receive sufficient irrigation. In addition, OC Waste &Recycling will ensure that a qualified habitat maintenance contractor will provide long-term habitat maintenance and monitoring for the new trees. • (MM-2) The Final Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan will be modified by the City as necessary to add additional white alders and western sycamore trees, that grow more quickly than coast live oak trees, so that the Revegetation Plan provides no major gaps for the long-term visual screening of the project site. d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. Finding: Less than Significant Impact The demolition of existing gas-to-energy facility structures will not result in any significant impacts to aesthetics/views. The demolition of these structures will be short term lasting approximately three months. A large crane will be used for the removal of the 105-foot high exhaust stack on the site, but the use of the crane is anticipated to last for two days. Both the temporary and permanent wireless telecommunication facilities will be designed so that any reflective surfaces will not result in any significant light and glare impacts to nearby homes, other adjacent land uses, or to drivers on Newport Coast Drive, San Joaquin Hills Road, SR-73 or any other roadways and streets in the local area. In addition, the temporary and permanent wireless telecommunication facilities will not result in the need for any artificial lighting. Demolition of the existing gas-to-energy facility structures and construction of the temporary and permanent wireless telecommunication facilities will only occur during daylight hours only; no night lighting will be utilized. As a result, the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts from substantial light or glare. Page 30 24 IL AGRICULTURE& FORESTRYRESOURCES. Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES—Would the project: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model(1997)prepared by the California Dept.of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring X Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a x Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220[g]),timberland(as defined by Public Resources Code X section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104[g])? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land x to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of x Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Impact Analysis Would the project: a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? C. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversation of forest land to non-forest use? e. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Page 31 25 Finding: No Impact The project site is completely disturbed and would not affect Farmlands listed as "Prime", "Unique" or of "Statewide Importance" as shown on the State Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. The project would not result in any conflicts with Williamson Act contracts nor would the project involve the conversion of farmlands to a non-agricultural use. No impacts to agricultural resources would occur. In addition, the proposed project would not result in any conflicts with forest land, timberland or Timberland Production areas. Also, the proposed project would not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non- forest use. No impacts to forest land would occur. 111. AIR QUALITY. Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact AIR QUALITY—Would the project: Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or airpollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable % air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to X an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air X quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant X concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of X people? Impact Analysis Would the project: a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Page 32 20 d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Finding: Less than Significant Impact The project air quality assessment is included as part of Appendix D. A summary of the project air quality assessment is included below. The project site is located within the South Coast Air Basin (Basin). The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) regulates air quality throughout the Basin. The federal Clean Air Act(CAA) and California Clean Air Act (CCAA) require preparation of plans to maintain air emissions within healthy levels. SCAQMD has responded to this requirement by preparing a series of air quality management plans (AQMP), the most recent of which was adopted by the governing board in December 2012. The 2012 AQMP incorporates the latest scientific and technological information and planning assumptions, including the 2012 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy(RTP/SCS) and updated emission inventory methodologies for various source categories. The 2012 AQMP includes the new and changing federal requirements, implementation of new technology measures, and continued development of economically sound, flexible compliance approaches. The AQMP projects attainment of federal and State air quality requirements and bases these projections on several assumptions. The AQMP assumes that general development projects will be constructed in accordance with the Southern California Association of Governments (SLAG) population growth projections and that general development projects will implement strategies (mitigation measures) to reduce emissions generated during construction and operation. Projects that are consistent with growth projections and that implement all feasible mitigation measures generally are consistent with the AQMP. Project total emissions of criteria pollutants (CO, ROC,NOx, SOx, PM10, and PM2.5) are unchanged from the existing land use. The project would not generate substantial new emissions and would not affect implementation of the AQMP. No mitigation is required. Long-term air emission impacts are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project-related change. The project consists of the demolition of an existing tower and gas-to-energy collection system and cell tower replacement at the Coyote Canyon Landfill. Once the demolition and construction operations are completed, there will be no new operational emissions from the project. Construction Impacts. Emissions of pollutants would occur during construction of the proposed project from soil disturbance and equipment exhaust. Major sources of emissions during demolition and construction include: (1) exhaust emissions from construction equipment and vehicles; and(2) fugitive dust generated by demolition activities, construction vehicles, and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces. Peak daily emissions associated with the on-site construction equipment, on-road haul trucks and vendor trips, and fugitive dust emissions during each of the construction tasks were calculated Page 33 27 using California Emission Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2013.2.2. The total peak-day construction emissions are summarized in Table 1 and detailed in Appendix D. The emissions listed in Table 1 represent the maximum daily emissions generated during each phase of construction. Table 1: Short-Term Regional Construction Emissions Total Regional Pollutant Emissions(lb day) Fugitive Exhaust Fugitive Exhaust Construction Phase VOCs NO, CO SOx PMta PM10 PM,,, PM'.' Demolition 4.6 44 29 .05 1.4 2.4 .26 2.3 Temporary tower 2.5 24 17 .02 .17 1.5 .05 1.4 construction Permanent tower 2.8 28 19 .03 .03 1.8 .01 1.6 construction Peak Daily 7.0 68 45 .08 5.5 4.0 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Emissions? No No I No I No No No Source:Compiled by LSA Associates,Inc.(May 2016). CO=carbon monoxide SCAQMD=South Coast Air Quality Management District lbs/day=pounds per day SOX=sulfur oxides NOx=nitrogen oxides VOCs=volatile organic compounds PMZ.,=particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size PM10=particulate matter less than 10 microns in size Since on-site construction operations must comply with dust control and other measures prescribed by SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403, compliance with these rules is assumed in Table 1. Table 1 shows that construction equipment/vehicle emissions during construction periods would not exceed any of the SCAQMD established daily emissions thresholds. Therefore,project- related long-tern air quality impacts would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Finding. Less Than Significant Impact The closed Coyote Canyon Landfill has an existing landfill gas collection system that is designed to safely collect and dispose of landfill gas generated by the decomposition of solid waste materials inside the landfill. The landfill gas collection system is essentially a large vacuum system that collects landfill gas generated inside the landfill, and then conveys the landfill gas to three existing flares on the project site, where the landfill gas is safety incinerated, in compliance with public health and safety regulations that are enforced by the South Coast Air Quality Management District, the California Department of Resources Recovery and Recycling (CalRecycle) and the County of Orange Environmental Health Department - acting in its role as the Local Enforcement Agency for CalRecycle. The three existing flares are located on the project site and will remain unaffected by the demolition of the gas-to-energy facility structures or the construction of the temporary and permanent wireless communication facilities. The flaring of landfill gas does not result in the creation of any migratory odors nor do the flares result in any human health impacts. In addition, demolition activities will not result in any impacts to the subsurface landfill gas collection system that connects to the three flares. The project will not result in any significant odor impacts. Page 34 22 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES—Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or % regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California X Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, venial pool, coastal, X etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption,or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with % established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or X ordinance? t) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, % or other approved local, regional,. or state habitat conservation plan? Impact Analysis Would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Finding: Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated The project site is completely paved and is surrounded by a 12-foot high perimeter wall, which has a front gate which is locked when facility personnel are not on-site. All of the landfill gas- to-energy structures are located inside the perimeter wall. The wall is surrounded by tall trees that are an estimated 20 to 60 feet in height. These trees are almost all non-native, ornamental trees that consist of various species of eucalyptus (Eucalyptus ssp.),myoporum(Myoporuln laetum) and Peruvian pepper(Schinus molle). The perimeter wall and tall trees were installed to Page 35 gq screen the landfill gas-to-energy facility structures from nearby residential areas in both Newport Beach and Irvine. There are gaps between the trees, especially on the western side of the project site. Also, the trees on the eastern side appear more prominent since they are located on a 10- foot high berm. A paved access road to the facility, that is approximately 1,400 feet in length and shared with the Irvine Ranch Water District, connects the facility site to Newport Coast Drive where there is a traffic signal. The perimeter wall and access road were constructed at the same time as the gas-to-energy facility in 1987. The perimeter trees were also installed at the same time. Diegan coastal sage scrub is located approximately 30 to 40 feet outside of the perimeter wall, on all sides of the project site and along the sides of the paved access road to the project site. Coastal sage scrub can be defined as low, drought-deciduous, and evergreen shrubs that occur generally below 3,000 feet in elevation on steep to moderate, south-facing, exposed slopes of the western mountains. Shrubs are more widely spaced than those typical of chaparral and do not have the characteristic rigidness or thick drought-resistant leaves. Coastal scrub communities are characterized by low shrubs and an absence of trees. Types of shrubs include either pure stands or mixtures of low, thick-leaved evergreens and coarse, deciduous species that drop their leaves in response to periodic drought conditions. Dominant species include California sagebrush (Artemesia californica), California buckwheat (Erigonum fasciculatum), coastal goldenbush (Isocoma menziesii), deerweed (Lotus scoparius), mesa bushmallow (Malacothamnus fasciculatus), laurel sumac (Malosma laurina), lemonadeberry (Rhus integrifolia), white sage (Salvia apiana), and small-flowered needle grass (Nassella lepida). Diegan coastal sage scrub integrates with chaparral communities at higher elevations and Riversidian sage scrub in drier inland areas (Holland 1986). Coastal sage scrub is considered a sensitive habitat because it supports a diverse fauna and has potential to support numerous threatened, endangered or rare species, and has been acknowledged as such by its inclusion in the Natural Community Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP) for the Central and Coastal Subregion of Orange County (Orange County 1996). Among these are the coastal cactus wren(Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus), San Diego horned lizard (Phrynosoma coronatum blainvillei), orange-throated whiptail (Cnemidophorus hyperthyrus), coastal western whiptail (Cnemidophorus tigris multiscutatus), Bell's sage sparrow (Amphispiza belli), coastal California gnatcatcher(Polioptila californica) and the southern California rufous-crowned sparrow (Aimophila ruficeps canescens). Scrub habitats are also important to larger species such as mule deer(Odocoileus hemionus) and mountain lions (Felis concolor).9 Undeveloped areas supporting natural habitats that may be capable of supporting sensitive biological resources within the City of Newport Beach are referred to as Environmental Study Areas (ESAs). An ESA may support species and habitats that are sensitive and rare within the region or may function as a migration corridor for wildlife. There are 28 identified ESAs within the City. Many of these sites contain one or more sensitive plant communities, and many species of wildlife. Some of the ESAs also contain endangered plant species of plants and animals. Most of these ESAs are protected as parks, conservation areas, nature preserves, and open space areas. However, each of these ESAs are subjected to various threats from the surrounding urban e City of Newport Beach General Plan Update EIR,p.4.3-3,July 2006. Page 36 9L) environment that include polluted water quality,traffic,noise, public access, development encroachment, erosion and sedimentation, dredging or filling, stormwater runoff, invasive species and feral animals.10 The area surrounding the project site and access road are located in the Coyote Canyon ESA.11 The project site and the access road to the project site are not located within the Coyote Canyon ESA since they are existing uses and are completely disturbed(i.e., paved). The viewshed trees surrounding the project site are located within the ESA. The project site is zoned OS (Open Space) and is designated OS (Open Space) in the General Plan Land Use Element. Citywide General Plan Natural Resources Policy NR 17.1 protects, conserves, and maintains designated open space areas that define the City's urban form, serve as habitat for many species, and provide recreational opportunities.12 Policy NR 10.3 protects and prohibits development in nature preserves, conservation areas, and designated open space areas in order to minimize urban impacts upon resources in identified ESAs.13 In addition, Policy NR 10.5 requires that the siting and design of new development, including landscaping and public access, protect sensitive or rare resources against any significant disruption of habitat values.14 Beginning in 1994, the Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA) established 122 acres of coastal sage scrub at the closed Coyote Canyon Landfill, on the main, east and south canyon landfill areas. This coastal sage scrub restoration was done by TCA as mitigated for the construction of the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor(SR-73). This coastal sage scrub restoration program has been highly successful and several nesting pairs of California gnatcatchers have been observed during surveys conducted by TCA. This coastal sage scrub restoration area provides an important linkage for the California gnatcatcher and other sensitive species between the San Joaquin Hills and Upper Newport Bay. A biological resources assessment was performed on April 27, 2016, of the project site and the area immediately surrounding the project site to determine potential impacts to biological resources as a result of demolition of the landfill gas-to-energy plant and construction of the temporary and permanent wireless telecommunications facilities. A Tree Health Assessment Report was prepared in June 2016 for the non-native trees surrounding the perimeter wall at the project site. These non-native trees, as shown on Figure 4, were installed in 1987 during the construction of the gas-to-energy facility in order to provide visual screening of the gas-to- energy facility from views in Newport Coast and other land uses located near the project site. The Tree Health Assessment Report, which is included as Appendix A, inventoried and evaluated 355 trees along the perimeter of the gas-to-energy facility site. The inventoried trees comprise four genera, with 193 trees identified as Myoporum(Myoporum laetum), 141 trees identified as eucalyptus trees (Eucalyptus spp.; Red River gum [E. camaldulenis], lemon scented gum [E. citriodora], bushy yate [E. conferruminata], silver dollar gum [E.polyanthemos], and red ironbark [E. sideroxylon]), 18 trees identified as Peruvian pepper(Schinus molle), and 3 trees identified as oak(Quercus sp). The three oak trees are the only native trees. 1°Ibid.,p.4.3-10. 11 Ibid.,p.4.3-10 and Figure 4.3-2. 12 Ibid.p.4.1-36. 13 Ibid.,p. 4.3-31. 14 Ibid. Page 37 q1 The Tree Health Assessment Report concluded that 67 percent of all of trees surrounding the project site are either dead or are dying and are therefore proposed for removal. In addition, since the project site is located in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, almost all of the remaining trees are proposed for removal, so that they can be replaced with native trees that present a significantly reduced fire risk. Twenty-four (24) healthy trees will be retained that provide important visual screening of the project site. A total of 331 trees will be removed. A Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan has been included as Appendix B. The Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan proposes to remove the existing non-native trees described above and replace them with native trees that will include 12 white alder and western sycamore trees and 63 coast live oak trees. This will provide effective long-term visual screening of the project site while still maintaining fire safety requirements that require sufficient spacing between tree canopies. The native trees will provide a much lower fire risk when compared to the existing non-native trees. The new trees will also have a dedicated above-ground irrigation line to ensure that the new trees receive sufficient irrigation (i.e., the existing trees do not have a functioning irrigation system). In addition, OC Waste &Recycling will ensure that a qualified habitat maintenance contractor will provide long-term habitat maintenance and monitoring for the new trees. While the proposed demolition of former gas-to-energy facility structures and the construction of both temporary and permanent wireless telecommunication facilities will not result in any significant impacts to biological resources, since these activities will occur on paved areas, the project will result in the replacement of the non-native trees that surround the project site. These non-native trees do provide suitable nesting opportunities for migratory birds. In addition, coastal sage scrub is located approximately 30 to 40 feet outside the perimeter wall. Also, coastal sage scrub is located along both shoulders of the access road to the project site. Coastal sage scrub provides suitable habitat for the coastal California gnatcatcher, which is a federally threatened species and a California species of special concern. If not implemented properly, the proposed tree removal and replacement activities could result in significant impacts to coastal sage scrub. In addition, if not implemented properly, the proposed tree removal and replacement activities could result in significant impacts to migratory birds. Construction could directly or indirectly impact nesting birds if their nests are located within or near the work area. To reduce these potentially significant impacts to biological resources to a less than significant level, the following mitigation measures will be implemented: Mitigation Measures • (MM-3) To avoid potential impacts to active bird nests, including coastal California gnatcatchers or migratory birds, the proposed demolition of structures, the construction of temporary and permanent wireless telecommunication facilities, and implementation of the Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan at the project site will comply with the NCCP Construction Minimization Measures. Specifically, these activities will occur outside the nesting bird season(i.e., February 15 to August 31). • (MM-4) A qualified biologist will conduct a pre-construction survey of the proposed work areas within one week prior to the start of the work to verify that no special-status Page 38 92 species, such as coastal California gnatcatchers, or migratory birds, would be adversely affected by the proposed activities. • (MM-5) For the proposed demolition activities and for the construction of the temporary and permanent wireless telecommunication facilities, all vehicles using the project site access road will remain on the asphalt access road. To prevent any impacts to coastal sage scrub, no staging areas, stockpiles, equipment storage, or vehicle turn outs will be permitted on the shoulder of the access road. • (MM-6) As a part of the contract for tree removal activities, OC Waste & Recycling will ensure that the contractor provides methods to protect existing coastal sage scrub so that there will be no removal or disturbance to coastal sage scrub during tree removal activities. b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Finding: Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated While the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to riparian habitat, as the proposed project is located completely on paved concrete and asphalt, the project would have the potential to result in significant impacts to coastal sage scrub, which is a sensitive plant community. However, mitigation measures MM-2 through MM-5 from Section 2.IV.a will be implemented to reduce this impact to a less than significant level. C. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh,vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Finding: No Impact The proposed project will not result in any impacts to Federally protected wetlands through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption or other means. The proposed project will not result in any impacts to wetlands, Federal or State jurisdictional waters or any other riparian areas. The proposed project will occur on a site that is entirely disturbed. No grading of federal or state jurisdictional waters or wetlands will occur. No impacts will occur. d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Finding: Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Page 39 q3 While the proposed project will not result in any impacts to migratory fish or impede the use of wildlife movement corridors or native wildlife nursery sites, the project could result in significant impacts to migratory birds. However, mitigation measures MM-2 through MM-5 from Section 2.IV.a will be implemented to reduce this impact to a less than significant level. e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Finding: Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated The proposed project would not result in any conflicts with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. There are no tree ordinances pertaining to the trees that will be removed and therefore no impacts will occur. However, activities associated with the implementation of the Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan have the potential to result in significant impacts to sensitive or rare resources (i.e., coastal sage scrub, nesting birds, and wildlife species) under Citywide General Plan Natural Resources Policy NR 10.5. Mitigation measures MM-2 through MM-5 from Section 2.IV.a will be implemented to reduce these impacts to a less than significant level. f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Finding: Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated The preparation of a comprehensive natural resources management conservation plan for the Central and Coastal Subregions of Orange County was completed in 1996. The Natural Community Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP) for the Central and Coastal Subregions of Orange County and the associated implementation agreement covers thirteen incorporated cities. In July 1996, the City of Newport Beach became a signatory agency in the NCCP/HCP. The purpose of the NCCP/HCP was to create a multi-species multi-habitat reserve system and implementation of a long-term management program that will protect primarily coastal sage scrub and the species that utilize this habitat. At the same time that it protects this habitat and species, the NCCP/HCP is also intended to allow for economical use of the lands that meet the people's needs. The NCCP/HCP is intended to focus on multiple species and habitats and address conservation of these species on a regional context. The three main target species are the coastal California gnatcatcher, cactus wren and orange-throated whiptail. There are twenty-six other species that are also identified and afforded management protection under the NCCP/HCP. An additional ten species of plants and animals are either federally listed or threatened as if they were listed according to FESA Section 10(a) and are addressed within the NCCP/HCP.15 The project site is located in the Natural Community Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan(NCCP/HCP) for the Central and Coastal Subregion of Orange County. More specifically, the project site is located within the Coastal Subregion of the NCCP/HCP and the project site is Ibid.,p.4.3-20. Page 40 q an existing use (i.e., landfill gas-to-energy facility) under the NCCP/HCP. The project area and habitat areas surrounding the perimeter wall of the project site are designated as Habitat Reserve within the NCCP/HCP. The proposed demolition of gas-to-energy facility structures and the construction of both the temporary and permanent wireless telecommunication facilities would not result in a taking or disturbance to coastal sage scrub or other native plant communities located outside of the perimeter wall; however, activities associated with the implementation of the Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan have the potential to result in significant impacts to coastal sage scrub. However, mitigation measures MM-2 through MM-5 from Section 2.IV.a will be implemented to reduce these impacts to a less than significant level. K CULTURALISCIENTIFICRESOURCES. Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact CULTURAL RESOURCES—Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a x historical resource as defined in¢15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an x archaeological resource pursuant to§15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological x resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? x Impact Analysis Would the project: a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? Finding: No Impact The proposed project would not result in any disturbance to historical resources, as defined in Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, as there are no historical structures located on the project site. All of the existing gas-to-energy structures located on the project site that will be demolished are less than 30 years old and are not historic resources. No impacts to historic resources will occur. b. Cause a substantial change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? Finding: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Page 41 95 The first generally accepted period of human occupation of Southern California began at about the end of the Pleistocene Epoch, about 10,000 to 12,000 years ago. Archaeological sites around Upper Newport Bay have yielded some of the evidence for the earliest human occupation of Orange County and date to about 9,500 years before present (BP). Over 50 sites have been documented, including Newport Coast and Banning Ranch. Many of these sites have yielded, or have been determined to have the potential to yield, substantial information regarding the prehistory of the City and the County, and have included human burials. At least two and possibly three distinct cultural groups inhabited the area, and later period sites indicate that the area was heavily populated at the time of European contact. Ethnographically, the Planning Area falls within a region in which tribal boundaries are unclear: both the Gabrielino and the Luiseno/Juaneno lay ancestral claims. According to David Belardes of the Juaneno Band of Mission Indians, the territory of the Juaneno extended north to the Santa Ana River drainage; however, Gabrielino territory is thought by some to extend south of the Santa Ana River Drainage to Aliso Creek, and possibly even further south.16 The Luiseno/Juaneno were hunters/gatherers, organized into sedimentary and semi-sedentary, autonomous villages. A large village was typically 30 square miles, and contained several hunting, fishing and collecting areas in different ecological zones. Seasonal moves to exploit resources outside a village's territory occurred during several weeks of the year. The coastal Luiseno/Juaneno bands exploited a variety of plant food resources. Seeds and acorns accounted for up to 75 percent of the typical diet. Many fruits, berries, bulbs, and roots were used as medicines, beverage bases, and manufacturing materials as well as food. Terrestrial game accounted for an estimated five to ten percent of the coastal Luiseno/Juaneno diet; fish and marine mammals represented an additional 20 to 35 percent. Luiseno/Juaneno material culture associated with food procurement includes tools such as manos and metates, as well as mortals and pestles for processing acorns and seeds, and pulverizing pulpy materials and small game. They probably hunted first with spears, and then later with bows and arrows. The projectiles themselves would have had fire-hardened wood or chipped stone tips. Near-shore fishing and marine mammal hunting were accomplished with light balsa or dugout canoes.17 Archaeological resources were discovered at the Coyote Canyon Landfill when the landfill was still operational prior to 1990. Archaeological resources were discovered in the main canyon landfill as well as the both the east and south canyon landfills. No archaeological resources have been discovered at the project site. Most sites were destroyed either unintentionally during landfill use prior to 1990, deliberately during landfill use after testing showed the site was not significant, or deliberately during landfill use after the conclusion of data recovery excavation. A summary of the archaeological resources found at the Coyote Canyon Landfill site are discussed below. All of these archaeological sites at the landfill contained quantities of marine shell and nearly all contained lithic debitage such as flakes. Most also contained flaked and ground stone tools such as projectile points and manos, fire-affected rock, and bone. Some of the sites contained beads, pendants and bone tools. One site was recorded to contain burned human bone. These sites have 6 Ibid.,p.4.4-3. Ibid. Page 42 go been described as residential bases and field camps. Both residential bases and field camps are habitation sites, distinguished primarily by site size, and quantity of diversity of material remains. Larger residential bases contain greater quantities of material and usually contain burned bone and items such as beads and pendants. Extremely large residential bases are known as villages. Smaller habitations with limited material, or habitation sites with a variety of material in smaller quantities, are known as field camps. Size is dependent to a great degree upon the number of occupants and duration of occupation. Sites occupied permanently by a large number of individuals are usually larger with more discarded material, while sites occupied temporarily by fewer individuals are usually small with less material. Residential bases and field camps are identified as large or small habitation sites. Sites with marine shell but few artifacts are classified as shell middens. A site can also be distinguished by whether it is a rockshelter or open-air site. Rockshelters contain some protection from the elements through the formation of a cave, overhang, or enclosure created by the shape of boulders or outcropping bedrock. The San Joaquin Hills contain a number of small and large rockshelters created by sandstone outcrops, many of which were used prehistorically for shelter.18 General Plan Historical Resources Policy HR 2.1 requires that new development shall protect and preserve archaeological and paleontological resources from destruction, and avoid and minimize impacts to such resources in accordance with the requirements of CEQA. In addition, Policy HR 2.2 requires that the project applicant retain a qualified archaeologist/paleontologist to monitor all grading and/or excavation where there is a potential to affect cultural, archaeological or paleontological resources. If these resources are found, the project applicant shall implement the recommendations of the archaeologist/paleontologist, subject to the approval of the City of Newport Beach Planning Division!9 The project site is completely disturbed from the original construction of the gas-to-energy facility in 1987. The project site is also completely paved with concrete and asphalt. While it is therefore unlikely that any significant archaeological resources exist at the project site, a mitigation measure has been added below. With the implementation of this mitigation measure, potential impacts to archaeological resources will be reduced to a less than significant level. In compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, specifically Public Resources Code 21080.3.1 and Chapter 532 Statutes of 2014, the City of Newport Beach conducted an AB 52 consultation process with those Native American tribes that have previously requested notification for projects in the City of Newport Beach where the City is the lead agency under CEQA and an EIR or Negative Declaration is prepared. On July 5, 2016, the City sent a request for consultation letters to the Juaneno Band of Mission Indians — Acjachemen Nation and the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation. On July 11, 2016, a response letter was received from Mr. Andrew Salas of the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation requesting formal consultation on the potential archaeological resources for the proposed project. �a Status Assessment of Cultural Resources within the Coyote Canyon Landfill,LSA Associates,p. 7,November 2014. 9 Ibid.,p.4.4-21. Page 43 q:7 The City will continue to work with the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation to ensure concerns are addressed. Mitigation Measures • (MM--7) The project applicant shall retain an archaeological and paleontological resource monitor to monitor the project's subsurface areas during land disturbance from demolition and construction activities. If any archaeological or paleontological resources are discovered, the archaeological/paleontological monitor will have the authority to stop work, assess the resources found, and implement a plan for the removal of the archaeological/paleontological resources if deemed significant. • (MM-8) During construction activities, the project applicant shall allow representatives of cultural organizations, including Native American tribes (i.e., Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians —Kizh Nation), to access the project site on a volunteer basis to monitor grading and excavation activities. C. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Finding: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Fossils in the central Santa Ana Mountain represent the oldest formations in the County at 145 to 175 million years old and contain aquatic fossil types, such as radiolarians (single-celled plankton), ammonites (extinct members of the class including nautili, squid, and octopi), and bivalves (such as oysters and clams). The predominance of these fossil types indicates that Orange County, for much of its geological history, was underwater. During the Miocene Epoch (26 million years ago to 7 million years ago), tectonic forces produced uplifts that resulted in the formation of mountains and initiated movement on the nascent San Andreas Fault system, forming numerous coastal marine basins, including the Los Angeles Basin, of which Orange County is a part. As the sea retreated, the County became a shallow bay surrounded by jungle and savannah areas, as indicated by the mix of aquatic and terrestrial fossils found in rocks of Miocene age. Miocene-age rock units that underlie the area, particularly in the Newport Coast area, are considered to be of high-order paleontological significance (6 to 9 on a scale of 1 to 10).20 Further tectonic activity began to uplift the land during the Pliocene Epoch (7 million years ago to 2.5 million years ago), and the sea slowly receded from the coast, resulting in the formation of a succession of shoreline deposits that formed a marine terrace. Sandstone deposited in the Newport Beach area during the Pliocene Epoch contains a variety of marine mammals, sea birds and mollusks. During the Pleistocene Epoch (2.5 million years ago to 15,000 years ago), the seas continued to retreat as tectonic uplift continued. Although the Pleistocene Epoch is known as the "Ice Age", 20 Ibid. Page 44 92 glacial ice never reached southern California, and paleontological evidence indicates that a heavily vegetated, marshy area extended inland beyond the shoreline. However, a variety of vertebrate animals typically associated with the Ice Age inhabited the area: local paleontological sites, particularly near the Castaways, have yielded fossils of Ice Age horses, elephants, bison, antelopes, and dire wolves. Also, a number of localities in the portions of the Vaqueros formation that underlie the Newport Coast area have yielded a variety of invertebrate and vertebrate fossils, and are considered to be of high-order paleontological significance (9 on a scale of 1 to 10). Other geological formations that have also yielded significant fossils include the Topanga and Monterey Formations.zl General Plan Historical Resources Policy HR 2.1 requires that new development shall protect and preserve archaeological and paleontological resources from destruction, and avoid and minimize impacts to such resources in accordance with the requirements of CEQA. In addition, Policy HR 2.2 requires that the project applicant retain a qualified archaeologist/paleontologist to monitor all grading and/or excavation where there is a potential to affect cultural, archaeological or paleontological resources. If these resources are found, the project applicant shall implement the recommendations of the archaeologist/paleontologist, subject to the approval of the City of Newport Beach Planning Department.2 The project site is completely disturbed from the original construction of the gas-to-energy facility in 1987. The project site is also completely paved with concrete and asphalt. While the surface of the project site has been disturbed, the construction of the proposed permanent wireless telecommunication facilities will require the digging of caissons for the tower foundations at a depth of up to 30 feet. Paleontological resources could be encountered during these construction activities. Therefore, a mitigation measure has been added under Section 2.V.c., above. With the implementation of this mitigation measure, potential impacts to paleontological resources will be reduced to a less than significant level. d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries. Finding. No Impact The proposed project would not result in any disturbance to human remains. The project site is completely disturbed from the original construction of the gas-to-energy facility in 1987. The project site is also completely paved with concrete and asphalt. No impacts will occur. VL GEOLOGYAND SOILS. Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 6.GEOLOGY AND SOILS—Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse Ibid.,p.4.4-4. 1'Ibid.,p.4.4-21. Page 45 q q Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact effects,including the risk of loss,injury,or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based X on other substantial evidence of a known fault?Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42? ii) Strong seismic groundshaking? X iii) Seismic-related ground failure,including liquefaction? X iv) Landslides? X b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and X potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,subsidence,liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code(1994),creating substantial risks X to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems X where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Impact Analysis Would the project: a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Finding: Less Than Significant Impact The Coyote Canyon Landfill is located along the northwesterly flank of the San Joaquin Hills within the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province of Southern California. The topography of the Province is characterized by elongated northwest trending mountain ranges separated by relatively broad, straight sided sediment-floored valleys, many of which are fault controlled. The general topographic expression is also present below sea level, in what is termed the "continental Page 46 100 borderland". The San Joaquin Hills, consisting of a broad gently rolling upland, cut by moderately steep-sided canyons, forms the main topographic relief in the north-coastal section of the Peninsular Ranges province. The Coyote Canyon Landfill site, which includes the gas-to-energy facility site, consists of gently rolling hills incised by moderately steep canyons which trend generally north to northwest. Prior to landfilling operations, Coyote Canyon formed the main drainage in the area. Topographic relief adjacent to the landfill varies from approximately 700 feet above sea level on ridges to the south, east and west to approximately 400 feet above sea level at the northern end of the landfill. Bedrock units within the Peninsular Ranges province vary from Mesozoic/Paleozoic metamorphic and plutonic rocks to Tertiary sedimentary rocks of both marine and non-marine origin. A large percentage of the bedrock units,particularly in the coastal region of the province, are capped by Pleistocene marine terrace deposits and late Pleistocene river terrace deposits. Holocene alluvium exists within the larger valleys between mountain ranges and also floors most stream channels. Geologic units within the province have been uplifted, tilted seaward, and sliced longitudinally into subparallel blocks for young, steeply dipping north to northwest— trending fault zones. Bedrock units underlying the Coyote Canyon Landfill site consist of interbedded siltstones, shales, and sandstones of the marine Middle Miocene Topanga Formation. The Topanga Formation has been subdivided into three members in the vicinity of the landfill. These members in ascending order are the Bommer Member(Ttb), the Los Trancos Member(Ttl) and the Paularino Member(Ttp). Of these three members, only the Bommer and Los Trancos Members are present within the Coyote Canyon Landfill site. Sedimentary rocks of the Bommer Member are characterized by thick-bedded, resistant, coarse-grained sandstones with minor thin interbeds of siltstone. The sandstone is moderately to well cemented and forms prominent resistant outcrops on the ridges to the east of the landfill. Sedimentary rocks of the Los Trancos Member are characterized by interbedded siltstone and fine-grained sandstone. Siltstones in the unit are generally greenish-gray to dusky brown, sandy to clayey,massive to well-bedded and moderately to well indurated. The color of the siltstone is variable and largely controlled by the degree of the oxidation, being greenish-gray to brown where oxidized, and dark gray to black in its unoxidized state. Generally, the unoxidized siltstones are well indurated and exhibit a massive or blocky structure, though locally, they do exhibit platy(fissile) partings on weathered surfaces. With the Los Trancos Member, interbeds of tan to orange-brown to greenish-gray, moderately indurated to well-cemented, fine to medium silty sandstone are locally abundant. Sandstones are generally thin-bedded but are locally thick-bedded and concretionary.23 Intrusive volcanic rocks interpreted as diabase sills and dikes (Tan 1976) are exposed to the west and east of the landfill site and northwest of the San Joaquin Reservoir. The diabase is deeply weathered and exhibits the texture of friable sandstone. In addition to the more aerially extensive exposures of diabase, fault zones to the east and southeast of the landfill have been zs Final Closure Plan for the Coyote Canyon Sanitary Landfill,prepared by Fluor Daniel, Bryan A. Stirrat& Associates and Moore&Taber,pp.2-1 —2-3,June 1990. Page 47 101 intruded by dikes. The absence of vertical or horizontal displacement of the diabase along these fault zones indicates no post-intrusion movement (Tan 1976). Terrace sand deposits, unconformably overlying the inclined beds of the Topanga Formation, are located on the tops of several prominent ridges adjacent to the landfill. These terrace deposits consist of light brown to light orange-brown fine to coarse-grained silty sand and sand, with abundant subrounded to rounded gravel. Formational materials, and to a lesser degree other surficial deposits, have weathered in place to form a soil mantle, which is locally several feet thick. Limited transport of these materials has formed thicker colluvium accumulations near the bottom of slopes. The composition and thickness of these residual and colluvial soils varies as a consequence of the parent rock and thicker, more clayey soils produced from siltstones and shales. Development of colluvium and native soil on sandstone is limited. Native soils and colluvium generally consist of sandy silt and sandy clay, with locally abundant siltstone fragments. Alluvial deposits are located at the bottoms of major canyons and locally underlie residual and colluvial soils on the slopes of the canyon walls. Alluvial deposits typically consist of light to dark brown sandy silt and silty sand, to dark reddish-brown silty clay. The composition and grain size of the alluvium varies as a consequence of the mode of transport and proximity to major sandstone and/or terrace outcrops. Coarse-grained materials are generally limited to the active canyon bottoms, while the finer grained materials are more typical of the alluvium as a whole 24 In general, the project site contains a thin layer of gravel fill underlain by sand. The project site is located four miles east of the active Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone. Other active or potentially active faults of seismic concern in the region include the Palos Verdes, Whittier-Elsinore, Chino-Elsinore and the San Andreas Fault Zones. Inactive or potentially active secondary faults in the vicinity of the project site include the Pelican Hill Fault system located 0.75 mile west-southwest, the Shady Canyon Fault located 2.0 miles east, the Laguna Canyon Fault located 3.0 miles southeast and the Cristianitos Fault located 15.0 miles southeast. Based on recorded earthquake magnitudes and locations, the Coyote Canyon Landfill site appears to have experienced normal seismic exposure during historic times. Surface and subsurface bedding plane attitudes within the Topanga Formation adjacent to the landfill typically strike between 30 degrees west of north and 90 degrees east of north with dips varying from 14 to 35 degrees to the west and northwest. Locally, more severe warping or folding near faults has produced local irregularities in this generally consistent bedding structure. Faults in the area of the Coyote Canyon Landfill site can be separated into two different types: faults associated with the Pelican Hill system, and faults intruded by diabase sills and dikes. The northwest trending faults, mapped in the southern portion of the project area, can be inferred to have a stress relationship with the Pelican Hill Fault, which is considered potentially active, owing to displaced Quarternary alluvium along its trace. In addition, several northwest-trending fault zones have been mapped to the east and southeast of the landfill. Some of these fault zones have been intruded by diabase sills and dikes. Although offset or displacement along these fault zones is evident between Topanga Formation members, no offset or displacement of the younger zn Ibid.,pp.2-6—2-7. Page 48 102 diabase is evident. This absence of post-intrusion displacement indicates that these faults are inactive (Tan 1976). The proposed project would result in less than significant impacts from strong seismic ground shaking or seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction. Although the project site is located in general proximity to several active and potentially active faults, the site is not, however, located within a currently established Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone. Neither field observations, nor literature search, disclosed an active fault trace through either the landfill or project site. It is therefore considered unlikely that any ground or fault rupture will occur at the project site. In addition, soils at the project site have low liquefaction potential.25 iv) Landslides? Finding: Less Than Significant Impact The project site is situated on a ridge at an elevation of approximately 780 feet above mean sea level. The site is relatively flat, but there is a drop in elevation around the site on three sides. On the eastern side of the site, elevations rise to the next hill. The general topographic gradient for the area appears to be falling to the northwest, although there are numerous local variations due to the hill and canyon topography in the area. At the project site, the topographical gradient is slightly falling to the north (GRS, 1993). No significant earthquake-induced landslides are anticipated at the project site during a maximum credible earthquake event.26 In addition, observations by OC Waste &Recycling civil engineering staff indicate that no landslides have occurred on the project site or the project site access road, since the construction of the current gas-to-energy facility structures and access road in 1987.27 b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Finding: Less Than Significant Impact For a discussion of the potential for soil erosion or the loss of topsoil, see 2.IX.c., below. C. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Finding: Less Than Significant Impact See 2.VIa—i-iii, above. The project site is not located on a geologic unit that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the proposed project. In addition, the project would not result in any on or off-site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. zs Ibid.,pp.2-8—2-17. zb Ibid.,p.2-17. 21 Communication with Greg Garber, OC Waste&Recycling Civil Engineer,May 9,2016. Page 49 103 d. Be located on expansive soils, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Finding: Less Than Significant Impact See 2.VIa-i-iii, above. The project site does not contain expansive soils. e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Finding: No Impact The project site is connected to the local sewer system and is served by a 6 inch sewer line. No septic tanks exist on the project site and therefore no impacts will occur. VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Less Than Significant Potentially With Lass Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS—Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the X environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of X greenhouse gases? Impact Analysis Would the project: a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b. Conflict with an applicable plan,policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Finding: Less Than Significant Impact The project greenhouse gas emissions assessment is included as part of Appendix D. A summary of the project greenhouse gas emissions assessment is included below. Page 50 10 Climate change, or global warming, (note the terms are used interchangeably for purposes of this analysis) is a worldwide environmental phenomenon. The recommended approach for GHG analysis included in the State of California Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) June 2008 Technical Advisory is to: (1) identify and quantify GHG emissions, (2) assess the significance of the impact on climate change, and (3) if significant, identify alternatives and/or mitigation measures to reduce the impact to below a level of significance (OPR 2008). The June 2008 Technical Advisory provides some additional direction regarding planning documents as follows: "CEQA can be a more effective tool for GHG emissions analysis and mitigation if it is supported and supplemented by sound development policies and practices that will reduce GHG emissions on a broad planning scale and that can provide the basis for a programmatic approach to project-specific CEQA analysis and mitigation.... For local government lead agencies, adoption of general plan policies and certification ofgeneralplan EIRs that analyze broad jurisdiction- wide impacts of GHG emissions can be part of an effective strategyfor addressing cumulative impacts and for streamlining later project-specific CEQA reviews" (June 2008 Technical Advisory,pages 7-8). Preliminary guidance from the OPR(OPR 2008) and recent letters from the Attorney Gencra128 critical of CEQA documents that have taken different approaches indicate that Lead Agencies should calculate, or estimate, emissions from vehicular traffic, energy consumption, water conveyance and treatment, waste generation, and construction activities. The State CEQA Guidelines leave the determination of significance to the reasonable discretion of the lead agency and encourage lead agencies to develop and publish thresholds of significance for use in determining the significance of environmental effects in CEQA documents. Neither the SCAQMD nor the City has yet established specific quantitative significance thresholds for GHG emissions for constuction-only projects. Until more guidance is provided from federal or State agencies, the more conservative SCAQMD screening significance criteria level of 3,000 MT of CO2e per year will be used for the proposed project. However, given the frequency of changes in regulations over GHG emissions,this standard should be recognized as interim and will likely change over time as further guidance is provided by federal or State regulatory agencies. Construction GHG Emissions. During construction of the proposed project, GHGs would be emitted through the operation of construction equipment and from worker and vendor vehicles, each of which typically use fossil-based fuels to operate. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHGs such as CO2, CH4, and N20. Furthermore, C114 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Exhaust emissions from on-site construction activities would vary daily as construction activity levels change. Table 2 lists the annual GHG emissions from project construction. Per SCAQMD guidance, due to the long-term nature of the GHGs in the atmosphere, instead of determining significance of construction emissions alone, the total construction emissions are amortized over 30 years (an estimate of the life of the project). 21 State of California Department of Justice,Office of the Attorney General. Comment Letters filed under the California Environmental Quality Act. Website: http://oag.ca.gov/environment/cega/letters,accessed May 2016. Page 51 105 Operational GHG Emissions. The project consists of the demolition of an existing tower and gas-to-energy collection system and cell tower replacement at the Coyote Canyon Landfill. Once the demolition and construction operations are completed, there will be no new operational emissions from the project. Thus, the equivalent annual GHG emissions from the project would be less than 10 MT/yr of CO2e. Table 2: Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions Total Regi nal Pollutant Emissions(MT/yr) Construction Phase CO2 CH, N2O CO2e 2016 Demolition 183 .04 0 184 Temporary Tower Construction 28 <0.01 0 28 2017 Permanent Tower Construction 83 .02 0 83 Total Construction Emissions 293 .07 0 294 Amortized over 30 years 9.8 <0.01 0 9.8 Source:Compiled by LSA Associates,Inc.(May 2016). CH4=methane MT/yr=metric tons per year CO2=carbon dioxide N20=nitrous oxide CO2e=carbon dioxide equivalent Therefore, equivalent annual GHG emissions would be below the screening threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e per year for commercial projects, and GHG emissions would be considered to have a less than significant impact. The proposed project would not impede or interfere with achieving the State's emission reduction objectives in AB 32 (and Executive Order S-03-05). No mitigation is required. VIII. HAZARDS&HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS—Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous X materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident X conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances,or waste within one-quarter X mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code x Section 65962.5 and,as a result,would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of X a public airport or public use airport,would the project result Page 52 10(o Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or x working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation x plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where x wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Impact Analysis Would the project: a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Finding: Less Than Sienificant with Mitigation Incorporated The 4.14-acre project site consists of structures associated with a landfill gas-to-energy facility that was operated from 1988 to December 2015. The facility received landfill gas from the adjacent Coyote Canyon Landfill and converted it to electricity. The landfill gas was dewatered, compressed, entrained with oil, and used as an energy source to heat a boiler which generated steam to drive a turbine generator (GRS, 2004). The facility has five buildings as well as numerous other supporting structures on-site, which are shown on Figure 4. In addition to the five buildings on the project site, the major features of the facility include the following: a boiler and dilution fan structure, five pad-mounted transformers, a generator breaker, a cooling tower structure, landfill gas blowers, four flares for burning excess landfill gas, a storage area and an exhaust stack associated with the steam plant. In addition, there are several above ground storage tanks located on the project site.29 The gas-to-energy facility utilized a number of hazardous substances and petroleum products for the operation of the facility. Most of the substances fall into one of four categories: maintenance products, oils, acids, and gasses. Maintenance products used included sealants, cleaners, anti- foam and weed killer. Some of the oils used at the site include compressor oil, lubricants, and Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment,20662 Newport Coast Drive, Parcel 4, Gas Recovery Systems, Newport Beach, Orange County, CA,Geosyntec Consultants,p. 5, September 2006 Page 53 207 various Mobil Oil and Shell Oil products. Sulfuric acid and hydrochloric acid were used on site as part of the power production operations. Compressed gases, including oxygen, acetylene, nitrogen, and helium were stored and used on site. A de minimis quantity of cleaning products was stored outdoors in an open area under the high pressure heaters.10 Most of the equipment on site is surrounded by a concrete secondary containment area. There are drains in these areas that lead to a below ground oil/water separator. This unit is a rectangular concrete tank approximately five feet wide, sixteen feet long and five feet deep. The top of the unit is approximately nine feet below ground surface. Three risers connect the oil/water separator to the surface. Two of the three risers are constructed with one foot tall square rings with a joint between each ring. The aqueous phase is discharged to the IRWD industrial wastewater system. The retained oil phase was periodically removed by pumping into a transport truck for off-site disposal by a qualified hazardous materials hauler. The above ground storage tanks stored the following materials: a 12,000-gallon tank stored landfill gas condensate; a 2,000-gallon tank stored turbine oil; a 1,200-gallon tank stored caustic fluids; a 800-gallon tank stored sulfuric acid; a 2000-gallon tank stored heat transfer oil; a 405- gallon tank stored dispersant (water cooling tower treatment chemical); a 55-gallon tank stored biocide (water cooling tower treatment chemical); two 100-gallon tanks stored propane; and a 9,000-gallon tank stored deionized makeup water.31 When the gas-to-energy facility ceased operations in December 2015, all of the liquids contained in these above ground tanks were collected by a licensed hazardous waste hauler and taken to a hazardous waste facility for proper disposal. The only exception is the above ground storage tank containing landfill gas condensate — this tank is needed as part of the landfill gas collection and flaring system.32 As part of a hazardous materials assessment conducted in 2006, hazardous substances were observed in the containers and tanks on-site. In general, these containers, drums and above ground tanks appeared to be in good condition with secondary containment.33 Federal and State regulations govern the renovation and demolition of structures where materials containing lead and asbestos are present. These requirements include: SCAQMD Rules and Regulations pertaining to asbestos abatement (including Rule 1403), Construction Safety Orders 1529 (pertaining to asbestos) and 1532.1 (pertaining to lead) from Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, Part 61, Subpart M of the Code of Federal Regulations (pertaining to asbestos), and lead exposure guidelines provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Asbestos and lead abatement must be performed and monitored by contractors with appropriate certifications from the State Department of Health Services. In addition, Cal/OSHA has regulations concerning the use of hazardous materials, including requirements for safety training, availability of safety equipment, hazardous materials exposure warnings, and emergency action and fire prevention plan preparation. Cal/OSHA enforces the hazard communication program regulations, which include provisions for identifying and labeling hazardous materials, describing the hazards of chemicals, and documenting employee- training programs. All demolition that could result in the release of lead and/or asbestos must be sa Ibid.,p. 17. sl Ibid.,pp. 17-18. 32 Communication from Supama Chakladar,Fortistar Methane Group, May 24,2016. "Ibid.,p.27. Page 54 102 conducted according to Cal/OSHA standards.34 For the demolition of structures at the gas-to- energy facility site, the storage building roof, shop building roof and administration building roof contain asbestos. The total amount of area that is estimated to contain asbestos that will require remediation is approximately 373 square feet, which is estimated to generate enough asbestos material to fill a 5-gallon bucket. A mitigation measure has been added to ensure that any significant impacts from asbestos materials will be mitigated to a less than significant level. No significant impacts to the public or to the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials will occur from the previous gas-to-energy facility operation or the previous storage of hazardous materials on-site for the gas-to-energy facility operation. In addition, the demolition of the gas-to-energy facility structures will not result in the release of any hazardous chemicals or the creation of any risk of upset conditions. Mitigation Measures • (MM--9) Fortistar will complete an asbestos abatement plan, pursuant to SCAQMD permit requirements. The asbestos abatement will be performed by a Cal/OSHA registered asbestos remediation company. After the asbestos is removed from the project site it will be disposed at an approved disposal facility. C. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Finding: No Impact While the proposed project is located within one-quarter mile of Sage Hills High School, located approximately 1,896 feet north of the project site, the proposed project will not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials or waste. Hazardous materials that were used for the operation of the gas-to-energy facility have been removed from the project site. No impacts will occur. d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Finding: No Impact The project site is not included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. No impact will occur. e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 4 City of Newport Beach General Plan EIR Update,p.4.6-20,July 2006. Page 55 :Lo9 L For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Finding: No Impact The project site is not located within an airport land use plan area, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, nor is the project site within the vicinity of a private airstrip. No impact will occur. g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Finding: No Impact The proposed project will not impair the implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to emergency access. During demolition and construction activities, Fortistar will ensure that sufficient access for fire trucks and ambulances is provided at all times at the project site and along the project site access road. No impacts will occur. h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residents are intermixed with wildlands? Finding: Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated A Tree Health Assessment Report was prepared for the non-native trees surrounding the perimeter wall at the project site. These non-native trees, as shown on Figure 4, were installed in 1987 during the construction of the gas-to-energy facility in order to provide visual screening of the gas-to-energy facility from views in Newport Coast and other land uses located near the project site. The Tree Health Assessment Report, which is included as Appendix A, inventoried and evaluated 355 trees along the perimeter of the gas-to-energy facility site. The inventoried trees comprise four genera, with 193 trees identified as Myoporum (Myoporum laetum), 141 trees identified as eucalyptus trees (Eucalyptus spp.; Red River gum [E. camaldulenis], lemon scented gum [E. citriodora], bushy yate [E. conferruminata], silver dollar gum [E. polyanthemos], and red ironbark [E. sideroxylon]), 18 trees identified as Peruvian pepper (Schinus molle), and 3 trees identified as oak (Quercus sp). The three oak trees are the only native trees. The Tree Health Assessment Report concluded that 67 percent of all of trees surrounding the project site are either dead or are dying and are therefore proposed for removal. In addition, since the project site is located in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, almost all of the remaining trees are proposed for removal, so that they can be replaced with native trees that present a significantly reduced fire risk. Twenty-four (24) healthy trees will be retained that provide important visual screening of the project site. A total of 331 trees will be removed. Page 56 210 The trees will be replaced with a combination of native white alders, western sycamores and coast live oak trees, as discussed in Appendix B Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan. This will provide effective long-term visual screening of the project site while still maintaining fire safety requirements that require sufficient spacing between tree canopies. These native trees will provide a much lower fire hazard risk, when compared to the existing trees. The new trees will have a dedicated above-ground irrigation line to ensure that the new trees receive sufficient irrigation. In addition, OC Waste & Recycling will ensure that a qualified habitat maintenance contractor will provide long-term habitat maintenance and monitoring for the new trees. A mitigation measure has been added below. With the incorporation of this mitigation measure, the potentially significant impact associated with fire hazards would be reduced to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measures • (MM-10) OC Waste & Recycling will remove the non-native trees that currently surround the project site in order to prevent a potential fire hazard. The existing trees will be replaced with native trees, with a dedicated irrigation system, which will significantly improve fire safety over existing conditions. 7X. HYDROLOGY& WATER QUALITY. Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY—Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X. requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of x pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including the alteration of the course of a stream or X river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface X runoff in a manner which wouldresult in flooding on-or off- site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems X or provide substantial additional sources of polluted nmoff' f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood X Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? Page 57 111 Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which x would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a x result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Expose people or structures to inundation by seiche, x tsunami,or mudflow? Impact Analysis Would the project: a. Violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Finding: Less Than Significant Impact The proposed project will not result in the violation of any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. For the demolition of the paved concrete at the project site, Fortistar will be required to apply for a General Construction Activities Permit under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems Permit (NPDES), issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region (RWQCB). As part of the General Construction Activities Permit, Fortistar will be required to prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), designed to control runoff, prevent erosion and protect water quality, as discussed in Section 2JX e. and f, below. The SWPPP will also be submitted to the City of Newport Beach as part of the City's demolition permit application. The demolition activities will not result in any significant impacts to water quality standards. b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses for which permits have been granted)? Finding: No Impact Based on the California Department of Water Resources [CDWR, 1967] and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board's most recent (February 2008) Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana Basin, the groundwater immediately below the Coyote Canyon Landfill property (which includes the project site) has no established beneficial use due to the low groundwater yield and naturally-high salinity content. Regionally, the groundwater discharges several miles to the north of the site into the Pressure Area of the Tustin Plain in the Orange County Groundwater Basin, the beneficial uses of which include municipal and domestic supply, agricultural supply and industrial service and process supply. Page 58 112 Previous geologic investigations at the Coyote Canyon Landfill site indicate that the bedrock at the site belongs to the marine Topanga Formation and is predominantly composed of well- consolidated and interbedded shales, sandy siltstones, claystones, and sandstones with minor volcanic (diabase) intrusives [Slade, 1985; Converse, 1986 and 1987]. In the canyon drainage, unconsolidated Quartemary alluvial deposits, up to a maximum measured thickness of approximately 50 feet, overlie the well-consolidated bedrock. The unconsolidated alluvial soil deposits generally consist of silty to clayey sands, silts and clays with minor sand and gravel layers. The groundwater at the Coyote Canyon Landfill site occurs in the top weathered portion of the older well-consolidated bedrock, and in the base of the younger unconsolidated alluvial soil deposits (where present in the canyon). Groundwater levels indicate hydraulic connection between the overlying unconsolidated alluvium and the underlying well-consolidated bedrock at the site, with no apparent confining layers [Converse, 1986]. The base of the alluvium (where present in the canyon) and the top weathered portion of the underlying marine bedrock represent the uppermost groundwater body below the site, which has no designated beneficial use based on its low yield and natural high salinity (brackish). While the overall aquifer system (containing both the base of unconsolidated alluvial deposits and the top weathered portion of the underlying well-consolidated bedrock) appears to be hydraulically connected, the hydraulic conductivity is relatively low, so hydraulic communication within the aquifer system is generally slow both horizontally and vertically.35 The proposed project will not result in any groundwater pumping or the use of any local groundwater wells that could substantially deplete groundwater resources or interfere with groundwater recharge. No impacts will occur. C. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact The development of the proposed project would not result in the alteration of the course of a stream or river, nor would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area. The project site is located on a relatively flat, disturbed area. Surface water runoff from the project site currently flows through a 12-inch pipe located in the low point of the northern wall and then down the access road, within concrete v-ditches, to a catch basin located within the access road at the intersection with Newport Coast Drive. This will not change with the proposed ss Combined Semi-Annual Water Quality Monitoring Report(October 2015—March 2016)far the Coyote Canyon Landfill Site,prepared by Geosyntec Consultants,page 5,April 30,2016. Page 59 213 project. While the existing concrete paving at the site will be demolished and backfilled with clean soil, Fortistar will implement measures designed to control erosion and siltation as discussed in Section IX e. and f, below. Drainage from the temporary and permanent wireless communication facilities will be conveyed into the project site existing perimeter drainage system, which then drains to the access road. The drainage pattern will not be altered by the demolition of existing gas-to-energy facility structures or the construction of the temporary and permanent wireless communication facilities at the project site. The proposed project will therefore not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface water runoff, nor would the project result in substantial erosion or siltation. e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Finding: Less Than Significant Impact As stated above, surface water runoff from the project site currently drains along the access road, within concrete v-ditches, to a catch basin located within Newport Coast Drive. The proposed project will not result in any increases in surface water flows over existing conditions. No significant impacts to existing storm water drainage systems will occur. To ensure that the proposed project will not substantially degrade water quality or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff to existing drainage, Fortistar will be required to implement a project specific SWPPP consisting of several Best Management Practices (BMPs). BMPs are used to control surface water runoff, erosion and siltation at the project site during the demolition of structures and the construction of the temporary and permanent wireless communication facilities. Typical BMPs are listed below: - Fuel delivery or dispensing will be observed by facility personnel. Fuel delivery or dispensing that is not observed by facility personnel is prohibited. - Vehicles and equipment will be kept in good working order. Equipment and vehicles with leaks are to be repaired promptly by trained mechanics. - Equipment and parts with a potential to impact storm water are to be placed under tarps as needed during storm events. - Spills will be reported and proper spill response procedures will be promptly implemented. Should such a situation occur, soils affected by spills and leaks from heavy equipment will be removed. Proper clean-up procedures will first involve removal of the impacted soil layer. The soil will then be placed in 55-gallon drums for off-site treatment and disposal. - Berms, silt fences, sandbags, hay bales, wittle-wattles, geo-logs and straw mats will be installed during construction to reduce erosion. Page 60 2� - Additional measures will include preventative maintenance, proper materials handling, spill prevention and control and litter control. With the implementation of the SWPPP, any impacts from surface water runoff, erosion and sedimentation will be less than significant. g. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? It. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Finding: No Impact The proposed project does not include the development of any new housing. In addition, the proposed project site is not located within a 100-year flood boundary as established by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.36 The proposed project will not expose people or structures to flooding risks. In addition, the project site is not located within a dam inundation area. No impacts will occur. j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Finding: No Impact The proposed project would not create any impacts as a result of mudflows from landslide prone areas or seiches from large inland water bodies. In addition, the project site is located far enough away from the Pacific Ocean (over one mile) and is at a high enough elevation that it would not be impacted by a tsunami 37 No impacts will occur. X LAND USE AND PLANNING. Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact LAND USE AND PLANNING—Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? X b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project X (including,but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, 36 www.fema.gov. 37 Final Closure Plan for the Coyote Canyon Sanitary Landfill,prepared by Fluor Daniel, Bryan A. Stirrat& Associates and Moore&Taber,pp.2-17—2-18,June 1990. Page 61 225 Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or x natural comtnunity conservation plan? Impact Analysis Would the project: a. Physically divide an established community? Finding: No Impact The proposed project consists of relocating four existing wireless telecommunications facilities on the existing 105-foot high exhaust stack and perimeter walls to two collocated 65' tall mono- eucalyptus towers and installing four temporary wireless telecommunications facilities to two collocated monopoles until the permanent sites can be constructed. The site is not developed with any residential properties nor are there any residential communities in the immediate vicinity of the site. The project site and surrounding properties have a zoning classification of Open Space and the land is undeveloped. Therefore, the project will not physically divide an established community and no mitigation is required. The demolition of existing gas-to-energy facility structures and the construction of temporary and permanent wireless telecommunication facilities will not physically divide an established community. Demolition will be a short-term activity that will be three months in duration. The temporary and permanent wireless telecommunication facilities will replace the antenna arrays that are currently located on the project site, on the 105-foot high exhaust stack that will be demolished and removed from the site. The new wireless communication facilities will also be located on the project site so there will be no change in land use as related to the wireless telecommunication facilities. b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project(including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Finding: Less than Significant Impact The project site is zoned OS (Open Space) and is designated OS (Open Space) in the General Plan Land Use Element. The proposed wireless telecommunications facilities do not conflict with the City's Zoning Code or General Plan because the collocated wireless telecommunications facilities are existing established uses. The facilities must be relocated due to the demolition of the 105-foot high exhaust stack. In accordance with Section 20.49.040 of Page 62 110 the City's Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Ordinance regarding preferred locations for telecom facilities, the project includes co-location of a new facility at an existing facility so that the four (4) wireless telecommunications facilities will be reduced to two towers in order to mitigate the number of facilities on the site. Per Section 20.49.030, new freestanding structures are defined as Class 4 (Freestanding Structure) telecommunications facilities. Per Section 20.49.040, new freestanding structures require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The City of Newport Beach is the reviewing authority for CUPS and a public hearing will be required. The proposed facilities are 65 feet tall in accordance with Section 20.49.040(C) as the Planning Commission may approve a CUP for a telecom facility that exceeds the height limit for the zoning district by a maximum of 15 feet, only after making the required findings in Section 20.49.060.H. The OS Zone has a maximum allowable height of 50 feet. The addition of 15 feet will allow for 65 foot high facilities subject to Planning Commission approval. The additional height is necessary for the carriers that are collocating to achieve their coverage objective. The permanent wireless telecommunication facilities have been designed to resemble eucalyptus trees in order to blend in with the existing eucalyptus trees surrounding the project site. The faux eucalyptus trees will not result in any significant aesthetics/views impacts to the surrounding community, per the analysis included in Section 21c. in this document. Therefore, the project will have a less then significant impact on the environment. In conjunction with the requested Conditional Use Permit, a request for two collocated temporary wireless telecommunication facilities is being requested so that the carriers do not lose coverage when the exhaust stack is demolished. Two carriers each will each be located on two 65 foot high monopoles for a period of approximately one year. Per Section 20.49.030(G) of the Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Ordinance, Temporary Facilities are classified as Class 5 (Temporary) facilities and can be installed on a temporary basis pursuant to a Limited Term Permit. The temporary facilities are necessary as the timing of the Fortistar demolition of gas-to- energy facility structures will prevent the carriers from being able to construct their permanent facilities prior to the demolition of the exhaust stack, which is anticipated to occur in the first week of December 2016. The carriers will resume construction of their permanent facilities after nesting bird season which is from February 15 to August 31. C. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Finding: Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated See 2.IV.f. Page 63 117 XI. MINERAL RESOURCES. Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact MINERAL RESOURCES—Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a(mown mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the X state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general X plan,specific plan or other land use plan? Impact Analysis Would the project: a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Finding: No Impact The proposed project would not result in any impacts to mineral resources. The project site does not contain mineral resources that are either designated as important to the State of California or are considered to be of local importance. In addition, the project site is not designated as a mineral resource recovery facility. XIL NOISE. Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact NOISE—Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or X noise ordinance,or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive X groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in X the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing X without the project? Page 64 21g Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project X expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would the project expose people residing.or working.in the project X area to excessive noise levels? Impact Analysis Would the project result in: a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Finding: Less than Significant Impact The project noise assessment is included as part of Appendix E. A summary of the project noise assessment is included below. The following provides an overview of the characteristics of sound and the regulatory framework that applies to noise within the vicinity of the Project site. The following are the criteria utilized to assess noise impacts. General Plan. The California Government Code Section 65302(g)requires that a noise element be included in the General Plan of each county and city in the State. The Noise Element of the City of Newport Beach General Plan (2006) is intended to identify sources of noise and provide objectives and policies that ensure that noise from various sources does not create an unacceptable noise environment. Overall, the City's Noise Element describes the noise environment (including noise sources) in the City, addresses noise mitigation regulations, strategies, and programs, as well as delineating federal, State, and City jurisdiction relative to rail, automotive, aircraft, and nuisance noise. Construction-related noise impacts are discussed in Goal N-5, Minimized Excessive Construction Related Noise. Under Goal N-5, Policy N 5.1, Limiting Hours of Activity,requires that the limits on hours of construction activities be enforced. Municipal Code. Section 10.28.040, Construction Activity—Noise Regulations,38 states the following: 8 City of Newport Beach. Municipal Code,Noise Ordinance.Website:http://www.codepublishing.com/CA/ NewportBeach/html/NewportBeachl0/NewportBeach1028.html#10.28.040,accessed May 2016. Page 65 210 A. Weekdays and Saturdays. No person shall, while engaged in construction, remodeling, digging, grading, demolition, painting,plastering or any other related building activity, operate any tool, equipment or machine in a manner which produces loud noise that disturbs, or could disturb, a person of normal sensitivity who works or resides in the vicinity, on any weekday except between the hours of seven a.m. and six-thirty p.m.,nor on any Saturday except between the hours of eight a.m. and six p.m. B. Sundays and Holidays. No person shall, while engaged in construction, remodeling, digging, grading, demolition, painting, plastering or any other related building activity, operate any tool, equipment or machine in a manner which produces loud noise that disturbs, or could disturb, a person of normal sensitivity who works or resides in the vicinity, on any Sunday or any federal holiday. Federal Transit Administration Criteria Due to the lack of vibration standards developed for local jurisdictions, vibration standards included in Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (FTA 2006) are used in this analysis for ground-bome vibration impacts, as shown in Table 3. Table 3: Construction Vibration Damage Criteria PPV Approximate L, BuildingCate or (in/see) (VdB)' Reinforced-concrete,steel or timber(no plaster) 0.50 102 Engineered concrete and masonry(no plaster) 0.30 98 Non-engineered timber and masonry buildings 0.20 94 Buildings extremely susceptible to vibration damage 0.12 90 Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment(FTA 2006). RMS vibration velocity in decibels(VdB)re 1 micro-inch/second. FTA=Federal Transit Administration RMS=root-mean-square in/sec=inches per second VdB=vibration velocity decibels PPV=peak particle velocity The criteria for environmental impact from ground-borne vibration and noise are based on the maximum levels for a single event. Table 4 lists the potential vibration damage criteria associated with construction activities, as suggested in the Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment(FTA 2006). FTA guidelines show that a vibration level of up to 102 VdB (an equivalent to 0.5 inch per second [in/sec] in PPV) (FTA 2006) is considered safe for buildings consisting of reinforced concrete, steel, or timber(no plaster), and would not result in any construction vibration damage. For a nonengineered timber and masonry building, the construction vibration damage criterion is 94 VdB (0.2 inch/sec in PPV). The PPV values for building damage thresholds referenced above are also shown in Table 4, taken from the Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual (Caltrans 2013), which included additional building definition and vibration building damage thresholds. Table 4: Guideline Vibration Potential Threshold Criteria Page 66 120 Maximum PPV in/sec Continuous/Frequent Structure and Condition Transient Sources] Intermittent Sources Extremely fragile historic buildings,mins,ancient monuments 0.12 0.08 Fragile buildings 0.20 0.10 Historic and some old buildings 0.50 0.25 Older residential structures 0.50 0.30 New residential structures 1.00 0.50 Modem industrial/commercial buildin s 2.00 0.50 Source: Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual(Caltrans 2013). Transient sources create a single,isolated vibration event,such as blasting or drop balls. 2 Continuous/frequent intermittent sources include impact pile drivers,pogo-stick compactors,crack-and-seat equipment, vibratory pile drivers,and vibratory compaction equipment. Caltrans=California Department of Transportation in/sec=inches per second PPV=peak particle velocity Table 5 illustrates the human response to various vibration levels, as described in the Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (FTA 2006). Table 5: Human Response to Different Levels of Ground-Borne Noise and Vibration Vibration Noise Level Velocity Level Low Freq t Mid Freq Z Human Response 65 VdB 25 dBA 40 dBA Approximate threshold of perception for many humans.Low- frequency sound usually inaudible;mid-frequency sound excessive for quiet sleeping areas. 75 VdB 35 dBA 50 dBA Approximate dividing line between barely perceptible and distinctly perceptible.Many people find transit vibration at this level unacceptable.Low-frequency noise acceptable for sleeping areas;mid- frequency noise annoying in most quiet occupied areas. 85 VdB 45 dBA 60 dBA Vibration acceptable only if there are an infrequent number of events per day.Low-frequency noise unacceptable for sleeping areas;mid- frequency noise unacceptable even for infrequent events with ILinstitutional land uses,such as schools and churches. Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment(FTA 2006). Approximate noise level when vibration spectrum peak is near 30 Hz. 2 Approximate noise level when vibration spectrum peak is near 60 Hz. dBA=A-weighted decibels Hz=Hertz Freq=Frequency VdB=vibration velocity decibels Thresholds of Significance A project will normally have a significant effect on the environment related to noise if it will substantially increase the ambient noise levels for adjoining areas or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community in which it is located. The applicable noise standards governing the project site are the criteria in the City's Noise Element of the General Plan and its Municipal Code as well as the FTA criteria for vibration impacts. Short-Term Construction-Related Noise Impacts. Short-term construction-related noise impacts would be associated with the demolition of existing structures on site and the construction of temporary and permanent wireless telecommunication facilities for the proposed project. Construction-related short-term noise levels would be higher than existing ambient noise levels in the project area today, but would no longer occur once construction of the project is completed. Page 67 121 Two types of short-term noise impacts could occur during construction of the proposed project. First, construction crew commutes and the transport of construction equipment and materials to the site for the proposed project would incrementally increase noise levels on access roads leading to the site. Truck pass-bys have the potential to cause an intermittent noise increase, generally assumed to be 75 dBA maximum instantaneous noise level (L..) at 50 ft. As stated above in the project description, access from the project site to the off-site areas of disposal will be generally along major roadways including Newport Coast Drive, SR-73 Toll Road, SR-133 Toll Road, I-5, Sand Canyon Avenue, and Jamboree Road. Assuming a total of 75 truck trips per day based on a conservative estimate, the increase in volume will be minimal as compared to daily traffic volumes along the respective roadways and associated traffic noise level increases; therefore, short-term construction-related impacts associated with worker commute and equipment transport to the project site would be less than significant. The second type of short-term noise impact is related to noise generated during demolition and construction of the temporary and new facilities on site. Construction is completed in discrete steps, each of which has its own mix of equipment, and consequently its own noise characteristics. The following is a list of equipment expected to be used: • 270-ton crane for the removal of the turbine and generator 170-ton crane with 150 ft of boom for the removal of the 105 ft tall exhaust stack • Komatsu 650 excavator with an Allied G 130 concrete hammer • 350 Link belt excavator with a G90 concrete hammer and a Labounty MDP 27 universal processor 966 Cat rubber-tired loader • Skidsteer loaders Water trucks 18-wheel semi-end dump trucks • Vibratory sheep's foot compactor Based on a description of the stages provided in the project description, the loudest phase of construction is expected to occur when jackhammering and pneumatic tools are used to tear apart the concrete pad at the site. Utilizing the reference noise levels provided in Table 6 below, noise impacts during this phase of construction were calculated at the surrounding sensitive receptors. At a distance of 50 ft from activities, it is expected that noise levels may reach 89 dBA equivalent continuous sound level (Leq) Table 6: Typical Maximum Construction Equipment Noise Levels (Lm„) Acoustical Suggested Maximum Sound Levels Type of Equipment Usa a Factor for Analysis(dBA Lma,at 50 ft) Concrete/Industrial Saw 20 90 Crane 16 85 Excavator 40 85 Page 68 122 Forklift 40 85 Generator 50 82 Grader 40 85 Jackhammer 20 89 Loader 40 80 Paver 50 85 Roller 20 85 Rubber Tire.Dozer 40 85 Scraper 40 85 Tractor 40 84 Truck 40 84 Welder 40 73 Source:Federal Highway Administration,Highway Construction Noise Handbook(2006). dBA=A-weighted decibel ft=feet L, =maximum noise level There are existing residences approximately 1,280 ft to the south of the project site and an existing high school (Sage Hill High School) located approximately 1,895 ft to the north of the project site as shown on Figure 2. Taking into account the distance from operations to the sensitive uses,noise level impacts are expected to be reduced by 28 dBA at the closest residences to the south and by 31 dBA at the high school to the north. The noise levels created from the loudest stage of construction are expected to reach 60.7 dBA Leq and 57.3 dBA Leg at the closest residences and school, respectively, which are comparable to the existing traffic noise levels from SR-73 as presented above. Compliance with the hours of operation required by the City's Municipal Code would result in noise impacts being less than significant. In addition to the required hours of operation, the following practices shall be implemented to reduce noise levels to the greatest extent feasible: • During all construction operations, the project contractors should equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards. The project contractor should place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the relatively more sensitive receptors nearest the project site. • The construction contractor should locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and relatively more noise- sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? Finding: Less than Significant Impact The project vibration assessment is included as part of Appendix E. A summary of the project vibration assessment is included below. Construction Vibration Building Damage Potential. Ground-borne noise and vibration from construction activity would be generally low at the surrounding noise sensitive uses. Excavators Page 69 123 and other heavy-tracked construction equipment generate approximately 87 VdB of ground- borne vibration when measured at 25 ft, based on the Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment(FTA 2006) shown in Table 7. Taking into account the distance from operations to the sensitive uses, vibration impacts are expected to be reduced by 51 VdB at the closest residences to the south and by 56 VdB at the high school to the north. The vibration levels created from the heavy construction equipment are expected to reach 36 VdB and 31 VdB at the closest residences and school, respectively. These levels of ground-borne vibration are far below the threshold of human perception, which is approximately 65 VdB, and the construction vibration damage criterion of 90 VdB; therefore impacts associated with vibration from construction activities are less than significant and do not require mitigation. Table 7: Vibration Source Amplitudes for Construction Equipment Reference PPV/Lv at 25 ft Equipment PPV(inch/sec) L,(VdB) Vibratory Roller 0.210 94 Hoe Ram 0.089 87 Large Bulldozer 0.089 87 Caisson Drilling 0.089 87 Loaded Trucks 0.076 86 Jackhammer 0.035 79 Small Bulldozer I0.003 58 Sources:Federal Transit Administration(2006). ft=feet PPV=peak particle velocity inch/sec=inches per second VdB=vibration velocity decibels Lv=velocity in decibels C. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Finding: No Impact As stated in Section 2.XII.a. above, construction activities are expected to occur over a defined period of time and will no longer occur once construction is complete, therefore, noise impacts associated with construction will have no long-term impact. d. A substantial temporary increase or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Finding: Less than Significant Impact As discussed in Section 2.XII.a., above, implementation of the proposed Project would include construction activities that would result in a temporary increase in ambient noise levels in the Project site vicinity above levels existing without the Project, but would no longer occur once construction is completed. Sensitive receptors in the Project vicinity are a minimum of 1,280 ft from proposed construction areas. Compliance with the hours specified in the City's Municipal Page 70 124 Code regarding construction activities, as well as implementation of noise reduction best management practices, would help reduce construction noise impacts on adjacent noise sensitive land uses and would reduce construction noise levels to a less than significant impact. e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a private or public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Finding: No Impact While the Project is approximately 4.75 mi southeast of the Orange County-John Wayne Airport, the proposed Project does not contain any noise sensitive areas, therefore,noise impacts associated with aircraft operations will have no impact on the proposed project. L For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Finding: No impact The Project site is not in the vicinity of a private airstrip. No impacts related to private airstrips are anticipated, and no mitigation is required. XIH POPULATIONANDHOUSING. Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact POPULATION AND HOUSING—Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and x businesses) or indirectly(for example,through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing X elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the X construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Impact Analysis Would the project: a. Induce substantial population growth in the area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure). Page 71 1215 Finding: No Impact The proposed project would not induce substantial population growth, either directly or indirectly. The proposed project would not result in the development of any new homes or businesses, nor would the project result in the expansion of any major utilities or public facilities that would serve future population or employment growth. No impacts will occur. b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Finding: No hnpact The proposed project will not result in the displacement of housing units, businesses, or people as a result of the project. No impacts will occur. XIV. PUBLICSERVICES. Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities,need for new or physically altered governmental facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts,in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire protection? % it) Police protection? x iii) Schools? X iv) Parks? X v) Other public facilities? X Impact Analysis a. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Page 72 120 i) Fire protection? ii) Police protection? iii) Schools? iv) Parks? V) Other public facilities? Finding: No Impact The proposed project would not result in new residential, commercial or industrial developments that would increase the need for fire protection and police protection services, the building of new schools and parks or the need for either expanded or enhanced public facilities and services. The project site will continue to be served by the City of Newport Beach Fire Department for fire response and by the City of Newport Beach Police Department for police service. No impacts to public services will occur. XV. RECREATION. Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that x substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which X might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Impact Analysis a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse effect on the environment? Finding: No Impact Page 73 227 The proposed project would not result in new residential, commercial or industrial developments that would increase the need for new recreational facilities or increase the use of existing recreational facilities. No impacts will occur. XVI. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC—would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized X travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? h) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards X established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results X in substantial safety risks? d) substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible X uses(e.g.,firm equipment,)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? X f) Conflict with adopted policies,plans,or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise X decrease the performance of safety of such facilities? Impact Analysis Would the project: a. Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b. Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standard and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Page 74 122 d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Finding: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Access to the project site is provided by the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor (i.e., SR- 73) and Newport Coast Drive. The project site has an existing one lane access road that provides access from Newport Coast Drive to the project site. Newport Coast Drive is a north/south roadway with a four-lane divided portion between Bonita Canyon Drive and SR-73, and a six-lane divided portion between SR-73 and Coast Highway. Newport Coast Drive carries traffic volumes from 11,000 to 2 1,000 39 These are average daily traffic volumes. The General Plan Traffic Study examined roadway segment capacities within and around the City of Newport Beach and analyzed the average daily traffic within the City and the volume/capacity (V/C) ratios assigned to these roadway segments based on existing traffic volumes and roadway capacities. The ratio of daily roadway segment volumes to daily planning level capacities provides a measure of the roadway segment level of service.40 The City of Newport Beach General Plan EIR does not indicate that the segment of Newport Coast Drive located north of the intersection of Newport Coast Drive and San Joaquin Hills Road has an unacceptable V/C ratio or an unacceptable level of service. Regional traffic interacting with Newport Beach generally accesses the City roadway system through the freeway ramps. Ramp intersections are maintained and controlled by Caltrans. Ramp capacity constraints can sometimes (during peak hours) slow access to the freeway system, potentially resulting in a back-up of freeway traffic onto the local roadway system. Conversely, traffic exiting the freeway system can sometimes cause congestion that affects the freeway mainline. The existing volumes on the SR-73 through Newport Beach indicate that the a.m. peak hour direction is northbound, while the p.m. peak hour direction is southbound. Under existing conditions, during the a.m. peak hour, both the SR-73 northbound off-ramp at Newport Coast Drive and the SR-73 on-ramp at Newport Coast Drive operate at an unacceptable level of service, at a level of service "E" and "F" respectively.41 The proposed project could result in a significant impact to level of service conditions at the SR-73 on- and off-ramps at Newport Coast Drive if a significant portion of the short-term demolition truck trips and a significant portion of the wireless telecommunication facilities' construction traffic were to occur during the a.m. peak hour. This in turn could cause temporary traffic impacts at Sage Hill High School. However, mitigation measures has been included that will reduce this potentially significant environmental impact to a less than significant level. "City of Newport Beach General Plan Update EIR,p.4.13-5,July 2006. 41 Ibid.,p.4.13-6. 41 Ibid.,p.4-13-14. Page 75 129 Approximately 10,000 cubic yards of clean soil will be imported during demolition and will be used along with the crushed concrete for backfill into the voids left by the removal of the structures. Since each soil truck can carry approximately 10 cubic yards of soil, approximately 1,000 two-way trips will be distributed over a three month period. Assuming 25 work days per month and a three month demolition schedule, the demolition component would generate approximately 14 two-way imported soil trips per day. For the estimated 14,360 square feet of structures that will be demolished, it is estimated that this will generate approximately 4 two-way truck trips per day over the three month demolition schedule. All demolition vehicle trips will be staggered over the entire working day. Metals will be transported to a recycling facility located in the City of Long Beach and the demolished concrete will be transported to the Ewles Materials recycling facility in the City of Irvine. Access from the project site to the Ewles Materials recycling facility (located at 16081 Construction Circle West, Irvine) will be Newport Coast Drive, 73 Toll Road, 55 Freeway, 405 Freeway, Jamboree Road, Barranca Parkway and Construction Circle West. Solid waste materials, which will include insulation, aluminum, gypsum, sheet metal and wood waste will be disposed at the Frank R. Bowerman Landfill in Irvine, which is owned and operated by the County. Access from the project site to the Frank R. Bowerman Landfill (located at 11002 Bee Canyon Access Road, Irvine)will be Newport Coast Drive, 73 Toll Road, 133 Toll Road, 5 Freeway, Sand Canyon Avenue and Bee Canyon Access Road. It is estimated that there will be no more than 75 two-way vehicle trips per day for all demolition of structures and wireless telecommunication facilities construction activities, which include all two-way trips from vehicles transporting demolished materials from the site, heavy construction equipment transported to the site, material delivery trips and construction worker commuting trips. For the proposed project, the majority of the vehicle traffic will occur during the demolition of gas-to-energy facility structures and for the construction of the temporary wireless telecommunication facilities, since both activities will occur at the same time. This is estimated to occur over a three month period from approximately October 6 to December 31, 2016. Construction of the permanent wireless telecommunication facilities will occur after the nesting bird season ends in 2017, after the end of the migratory bird nesting season (i.e., August 31). Construction of the permanent facilities will take three months and is anticipated to be completed by December 2017. The project would not conflict with any applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, nor would the project result in any significant impacts to mass transit or alternative modes of transportation. In addition, the project would not conflict with any congestion management programs. The demolition and construction projects are short-term in nature. With the implementation of the mitigation measures included below, which include the staggering of demolition and construction vehicle trips throughout the working day, and considering the limited number of demolition and construction vehicle trips per day (no more than 75 two-way trips per day), no Page 76 ISO significant traffic impacts will occur with the implementation of the proposed project, after the incorporation of mitigation measures. Demolition and construction vehicles turning right on a red light at the traffic signal at the intersection of the project site access road and Newport Coast Drive have the potential to create a traffic safety hazard, since vehicles travel at a high rate of speed on Newport Coast Drive. Demolition and construction vehicles will be prohibited from making right turns on the access road at the intersection, when there is a red light, onto Newport Coast Drive. A mitigation measure has been added so that this potential traffic safety hazard will be reduced to a less than significant level. The project site is served by a one lane paved access road. During demolition and construction activities it will not be possible for trucks to go to and from the project site at the same time without causing traffic safety impacts. Therefore, a mitigation measure, which will include the use of spotters, has been added so that this potential traffic safety hazard will be reduced to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measures • (MM-11) Prior to the initiation of demolition activities at the project site, Fortistar, in consultation with the carriers, will prepare a traffic control plan for demolition and construction. The traffic control plan will include the staggering of truck trips throughout the day on Newport Coast Drive, so that the minimum practicable number of truck trips will occur during the a.m, peak period, to reduce impacts as much as possible to Sage Hill High School and both the SR-73 on and off-ramps at Newport Coast Drive. • (MM-12) All demolition and construction vehicle drivers will be informed that turning right on the red light at the traffic signal at the intersection of the project site access road and Newport Coast Drive will be prohibited for the duration of demolition and construction activities. A sign will be posted at the entrance to the intersection to remind drivers that they are prohibited from making a right-turn at the red light onto Newport Coast Drive. • (MM-13) For the duration of the demolition and construction activities, electronic signage will be placed near Sage Hill High School to inform drivers regarding the duration of the demolition and construction activities and to indicate that large trucks may be present for the duration of construction and demolition activities. • (MM-14) Construction spotters with walkie-talkies will be assigned on both ends of the project site access road to guide trucks during project demolition and construction activities. Trucks will only be able to travel in one direction on the one lane paved access road at a time. Trucks that are waiting to go up the access road will wait across the street on the main canyon landfill property until the spotter informs them that it is safe to proceed up the access road to the project site. Page 77 131 C. Result in a change in air traffic patterns,including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? Finding: No Impact The project would not result in any change in air traffic patterns. The project, therefore, will have no impact on air traffic safety. e. Result in inadequate emergency access? Finding: No hnpact The proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to emergency access. During demolition and construction activities, Fortistar will ensure that sufficient access for fire trucks and ambulances is provided at all times at the project site and along the project site access road. No impacts will occur. f. Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities? Finding: No hnpact The project will not result in any conflicts with adopted policies, plans or programs regarding public transit, bicycle or pedestrian facilities. No impacts will occur. XVII. UTILITIES&SERVICE SYSTEMS. Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS—Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Y Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing X facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new stone water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the X construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or X expanded entitlements needed? Page 78 132 Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has X adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to X accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal,state,and local statutes and regulations X related to solid waste? Impact Analvsis Would the project: a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts? C. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Finding: No Impact Existing utilities that serve the landfill gas-to-energy facility include a t/2 to 1-inch potable water line, a 6-inch reclaimed water line a 6-inch sewer line with water, reclaimed water and sewer service all provided by the Irvine Ranch Water District. There is a 4-inch natural gas line with service provided by the Southern California Gas Company and a 69kV electrical interconnect with service provided by Southern California Edison. Fire and emergency medical services are provided by the City of Newport Beach Fire Department and police services are provided by the City of Newport Beach Police Department. The proposed project will be served by the same service providers. No improvement to existing utility connections or lines will be required. Page 79 133 Surface water runoff from the project site currently flows through a 12-inch pipe located in the low point of the northern wall and then down the access road, within concrete v-ditches, to a catch basin located within the project site access road at the intersection with Newport Coast Drive. This will not change with the proposed project. The proposed project will not result in the violation of any wastewater treatment requirements or require the construction of any new water or wastewater treatment facilities. The project will not result in the construction of any new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities. Potable water, reclaimed water and sewer service will continue to be provided by the Irvine Ranch Water District. The proposed project will not result in an increased demand for potable water, reclaimed water or sewer service. f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Finding: No Impact The project will be served by the Frank R. Bowerman Landfill, located at 11002 Bee Canyon Access Road, Irvine. The landfill is owned and operated by the County of Orange and has available capacity through 2074. No impacts to solid waste landfill capacity will occur. g. Comply with federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Finding: No !Mact The City of Newport Beach requires as part of its demolition permit process that at least 50 percent of all demolished materials be recycled for demolition projects located in the City. For the proposed project, almost all of the demolished materials will be recycled, with the exception of the administrative building trailer and the cooling towers. No impacts will occur. XVIIL MANDATORY FINDINGS Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or C animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (`Cumulatively x considerable' means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects Page 80 IS4 Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact of past projects,the effects of other current projects,and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either x directly or indirectly? Impact Analvsis a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Finding: No Impact The proposed project would not substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, or reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. hi addition, the proposed project would not eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. The proposed project will occur on a site that has been previously disturbed and is completely paved. b. Does the project have possible environmental effects, which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) Finding: No Impact The proposed project would result in significant environmental impacts to biological resources, cultural resources, hazards & hazardous materials and transportation/traffic. However, all of these significant environmental impacts can be reduced to a less than significant level with the incorporation of mitigation measures that have been added to the project. In addition, all of these significant environmental impacts are project-specific in nature, are short-term and would not result in cumulative impacts. C. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Finding: No Impact Page 81 13.E The proposed project will not result in any adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. 3.0 INVENTORY OF MITIGA TON MEASURES Aesthetics (MM-1) In order to reduce long-tern aesthetics/views impacts to a less than significant level, OC Waste &Recycling will implement a Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan for the proposed project which will remove the majority of the non-native trees that currently surround the project site and replace them with native white alders, western sycamores and coast live oak trees. The new trees will also have a dedicated above-ground irrigation line to ensure that the new trees receive sufficient irrigation. In addition, OC Waste&Recycling will ensure that a qualified habitat maintenance contractor will provide long-term habitat maintenance and monitoring for the new trees. (MM-2) The Final Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan will be modified by the City as necessary to add additional white alders and western sycamore trees, that grow more quickly than coast live oak trees, so that the Revegetation Plan provides no major gaps for the long-term visual screening of the project site. Biological Resources (MM-3) To avoid potential impacts to active bird nests, including coastal California gnatcatchers or migratory birds, the proposed demolition of structures, the construction of temporary and permanent wireless telecommunication facilities, and implementation of the Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan at the project site will comply with the NCCP Construction Minimization Measures. Specifically, these activities will occur outside the nesting bird season (i.e., February 15 to August 31). (MM-4) A qualified biologist will conduct a pre-construction survey of the proposed work areas within one week prior to the start of the work to verify that no special-status species, such as coastal California gnatcatchers, or migratory birds,would be adversely affected by the proposed activities. (MM-5) For the proposed demolition activities and for the construction of the temporary and permanent wireless telecommunication facilities, all vehicles using the project site access road will remain on the asphalt access road. To prevent any impacts to coastal sage scrub, no staging areas, stockpiles, equipment storage, or vehicle turn outs will be permitted on the shoulder of the access road. (MM-6) As a part of the contract for tree removal activities, OC Waste & Recycling will ensure that the contractor provides methods to protect existing coastal sage scrub so that there will be no removal or disturbance to coastal sage scrub during tree removal activities. Cultural Resources Page 82 130 (MM-7) The project applicant shall retain an archaeological and paleontological resource monitor to monitor the project's subsurface areas during land disturbance from demolition and construction activities. If any archaeological or paleontological resources are discovered, the archaeological/paleontological monitor will have the authority to stop work, assess the resources found, and implement a plan for the removal of the archaeological/paleontological resources if deemed significant. (MM-8) During construction activities, the project applicant shall allow representatives of cultural organizations, including Native American tribes (i.e., Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation), to access the project site on a volunteer basis to monitor grading and excavation activities. Hazards & Hazardous Materials (MM-9) Fortistar will complete an asbestos abatement plan, pursuant to SCAQMD permit requirements. The asbestos abatement will be performed by a Cal/OSHA registered asbestos remediation company. After the asbestos is removed from the project site it will be disposed at an approved disposal facility. (MM-10) OC Waste & Recycling will remove the non-native trees that currently surround the project site in order to prevent a potential fire hazard. The existing trees will be replaced with native trees, with a dedicated irrigation system, which will significantly improve fire safety over existing conditions. Transportation/Traffic (MM-11) Prior to the initiation of demolition activities at the project site, Fortistar, in consultation with the carriers, will prepare a traffic control plan for demolition and construction. The traffic control plan will include the staggering of truck trips throughout the day on Newport Coast Drive, so that the minimum practicable number of truck trips will occur during the a.m. peak period, to reduce impacts as much as possible to Sage Hill High School and both the SR-73 on and off-ramps at Newport Coast Drive. (MM-12) All demolition and construction vehicle drivers will be informed that turning right on the red light at the traffic signal at the intersection of the project site access road and Newport Coast Drive will be prohibited for the duration of demolition and construction activities. A sign will be posted at the entrance to the intersection to remind drivers that they are prohibited from making a right-tum at the red light onto Newport Coast Drive. (MM-13) For the duration of the demolition and construction activities, electronic signage will be placed near Sage Hill High School to inform drivers regarding the duration of the demolition and construction activities and to indicate that large trucks may be present for the duration of construction and demolition activities. (MM-14) Construction spotters with walkie-talkies will be assigned on both ends of the project site access road to guide trucks during project demolition and construction activities. Trucks will Page 83 137 only be able to travel in one direction on the one lane paved access road at a time. Trucks that are waiting to go up the access road will wait across the street on the main canyon landfill property until the spotter informs them that it is safe to proceed up the access road to the project site. 4.0 REPORT PREPARERS • LSA—Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Noise • OC Waste & Recycling— Remainder of Initial Study Page 84 138 L C ^ LSA EXECUTIVE INC. FRESNO RIVERSIDE J � \ 20 EXECUTIVE PARK SUITE 200 949.553.0666 TEL BERKELEY PALM SPRINGS ROC LUIS IRVINE, CALIF08NiA 926 14 949.553.8076 FAX GARL$BAD PT. RICHMOND SAN LUIS OffiSPO July 5, 2016 John Amau OC Waste&Recycling 300 North Flower Street, Suite 400 Santa Ana, California 92703 Subject: Coyote Canyon Landfill Gas Plant Tree Health Assessment in the City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, California(LSA Project No. SWT1601) Dear Mr. Arnau: Per your request,LSA Associates,Inc. (LSA) conducted a tree health assessment of the nonnative trees surrounding the Coyote Canyon Landfill Gas Plant(LFG Plant)project site (site). This Tree Health Assessment Report documents the findings of the on-site tree inventory and assessment conducted by LSA for the purpose of identifying and evaluating all trees within the survey limits of the site. The project site is located across Newport Coast Drive from the main landfill at 20662 Newport Coast Drive in the City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, California. INTRODUCTION LSA inventoried and evaluated 355 trees along the perimeter of the gas-to-energy facility(facility) site. The inventoried trees comprised four genera, with 193 trees identified as Myoporum(Myoporum laetum),141 trees identified as eucalyptus species (Eucalyptus spp.; Red River gum [E. camaldulensis], lemon scented gum[E. citriodora],bushy yate [E. conferruminata], silver dollar gum [E.polyanthemos], and red ironbark[E. sideroxylon]), 18 trees identified as Peruvian pepper(Schinus molle), and 3 trees identified as oak(Quercus sp). SURVEY AREA The 4.14-acre facility site is located across the street from the main landfill at 20662 Newport Coast Drive, with the subject trees originally planted as visual screening for the facility(Figure 1; all figures attached). METHODS LSA surveyed and mapped all trees within the designated survey area with a diameter at breast height (DBH) of greater than 2 inches. The on-site tree inventory was conducted on June 21, 2016,and June 22,2016,by Associate Biologist Leo Simone(International Society of Arboriculture [ISA] Certified Arborist/Certified Tree Risk Assessor No.WE-8491A) and Biologist Claudia Bauer. The tree inventory data and physical measurements were taken during the field visits. The entire survey 7/5/16((PASWT1601\SWT1601_ArboristReport_re 070516.docx» PLANNING I ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES I DESIGN ^ q is J LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. was conducted on foot,and all qualifying trees within the survey area boundary were inventoried, assigned numbers, and evaluated for the following attributes: Species (i.e., scientific and common name); • DBH(4.5 feet [ft] above grade); • Number of stems; • Health observations and notes(e.g.,health structure, mechanical damage, and infestation); • Tree condition(a rating of 0-4,where 0 indicates a dead tree and 4 indicates good health and structure); • Global positioning system location; and Dead trees were tagged with an aluminum tag with a unique identifier correlated to the mapped location of the tree. Table A,Tree Rating System, describes how the trees were rated. The Tree Attribute Table(attached) identifies all trees by number. The trees' scientific names, common names,DBH,ratings, and survey comments are also included in the attached Tree Attribute Table. Table A: Tree Rating System Rating Tree Condition Description 0 Dead Trees rated as a 0 have no significant sign of life. 1 Extreme Trees rated as a 1 have extreme problems with health and structure.These trees have issues Problems that are not correctable and may be hazardous if there is a target(i.e.,life or property). 2 Poor Trees rated as a 2 have major problems with health and structure but the tree's condition can be improved by following the Arborist recommendations.After the recommended actions are completed,the tree's rating can be raised to a 3.These trees could pose a risk if there is a target and the recommended actions are not taken. 3 Fair Trees rated as a 3 have minor problems with health and structure and pose no immediate danger to a target.Minor defects can be minimized by following the Arborist recommendations. 4 Good Trees rated as a 4 have no apparent problems that can be seen by a Certified Arborist from visual ground inspection.Future hazards can be reduced or even averted by following Arborist recommendations to keep the tree in good structural and health conditions. The project location is shown on Figure 1. Figure 2 shows the project survey area and inventoried tree locations displayed on an aerial photograph base map at a scale of 1 inch=30 ft. OBSERVATIONS AND DISCUSSION LSA inventoried and evaluated 355 trees within the project area. The trees represent four genera: Myoporum laetum (Myoporum);Eucalyptus spp. (Eucalyptus), Schinus molle(Peruvian pepper tree), and Quercus sp. (Oak)(SelecTree 1995-2016). LSA identified 193 myoporum trees, 141 eucalyptus trees, 18 Peruvian pepper trees, and 3 oak trees. 7/5/I6aP:\SWT1601\SWT1601_ArbonstRepon rev 070516.docx» 2 140 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Tree Ratings and Conditions Of the 355 trees inventoried, 116 have a 0 rating(Dead), of which 76 are eucalyptus trees and the remaining 40 are myoporum trees. A total of 123 trees have a 1 rating(Extreme Problems),consisting of 91 myoporum trees,29 eucalyptus trees, and 3 Peruvian pepper trees.A total of 93 trees have a 2 rating(Poor), consisting of 57 myoporum trees,23 eucalyptus trees, 11 Peruvian pepper trees, and 2 oak trees. A total of 20 trees have a 3 rating(Fair), consisting of 10 eucalyptus trees, 5 myoporum trees,4 Peruvian pepper trees, and 1 oak tree. Three of the inventoried trees have a 4 rating(Good); all of the trees rated 4 were eucalyptus trees. Invasive Species Pro£tle Myoporum trees,Peruvian pepper trees, and many of the blue gum and red gum eucalyptus trees present on the project site are considered invasive by the California Invasive Plant Council(Cal-IPC). These species have longevity of 50 to 100 years and although they are somewhat drought tolerant, they are highly susceptible to various pests and diseases.' Myoporum trees, Peruvian pepper trees, and eucalyptus trees tend to have a medium-weak branch attachment and have a high potential for root damage.2 Birds and mammals transport myoporum,Peruvian pepper, and eucalyptus tree seeds, and due to the aggressive growth of these trees they are able to displace native trees and form dense thickets. These species are known to be a serious problem in Southern California. Pest Infestation Most of the trees evaluated exhibit signs of pest infestation resulting from a combination of insect damage from chewing,boring, and sucking insects. Chewing insects migrate to the tree's foliage to feed on the leaves and fruit. Caterpillars and beetles make up the largest proportion of chewing insects. Generally,trees can recover from an attack of these defoliators, although repeat infestation can weaken and eventually kill the tree by starving the tree of energy. Boring insects are often the most harmful to trees and, if left untreated, cause death. Boring, or tunneling, insects cause damage by boring into the stem,roots, or twigs of a tree. Boring insects generally feed on the vascular tissues of the tree. Eventually,the upper leaves are deprived of nutrients and moisture and the tree dies. Signs of borer infestation include entry and exit holes in the bark, small mounds of sawdust at the base,and sections of the crown wilting and dying. It is important to regularly monitor a tree's trunk for signs of boring insects to enable early identification and quick treatment. Sucking insects damage trees by sucking the liquid from leaves and twigs. Many sucking insects (e.g., scale insects) are relatively immobile, living on the outside of a branch and forming a hard protective outer coating while they feed on the plant juices in the twig. Signs of infestation include scaly formations on branches, dieback of leaves,and honeydew production. As with other insect SelecTree. "Myoporum laetum and Schinus molle Tree Record." 1995-2016.Website: http://selectree.calpoly.edu/tree-detail/schinus-molle, accessed May 12,2016. z Ibid. 7/5/16aP:\SWT1601\SWT1601_ArboristRepon rev070516.docx>, 3 1J 2 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. infestations,prevention is the best approach for maintaining healthy trees. Once sucking insects mature on the tree,they generally must be killed on contact to prevent reproduction and achieve effective control. Codominant Trunk Leaders The term "codominant"refers to stems,trunks, or leaders and describes the condition when there is more than one main stem that is about the same size in diameter(Gilman 2002).As the tree grows, the stems remain similar in size without any single stem becoming dominant. This is an important structural defect because it prohibits the strong and normal branch attachment between the branch and trunk. In fact, as the tree grows,the stems expand first against each other and then outward when there is no more space,creating a condition known as "included bark."Included bark leaves very little physical connection between the leaders,which increases the probability of failure. Therefore, the union shape between the leaders is important because V-shaped unions(less space)are more likely to fail than U-shaped unions (more space; Photo 1). Codominant stems can also occur within the canopy of trees. Codominant stems are noted by the phrase,"narrow angles of attachment."These attachments are also weak and can be with or without included bark. Codominant Stem Union Shapes ti_ t t , t Photo 1.The V-and U-shaped codominant stem unions,from left. Pruning Cuts and Woundwood. Trees are influenced by and respond to their environment, weight loads, and the availability of essential resources by growing. Woundwood is a special type of growth that trees produce in respond to cambial damage (Dunster 2013). The tissue that is developed consists of lignified differentiated tissue developing from the mass of cells (callus; Photo 2). What makes this growth special is that it is chemically different and usually denser than normal growth,which allows the woundwood to reinforce the wounded area and prevent decay and pests. The rate of woundwood development is dependent on many factors relating to tree health and species characteristics. 7/5/16«P:\SWT1601\SWT1601_ArboristRepon rev 070516.docx» 4 142 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Many of the trees in the project area had pruning cut(s)with little to no woundwood. Trees should be monitored for woundwood to determine if the trees have enough energy or resources to properly compartmentalize the wounds. Decay can advance relatively quickly if the tree does not have enough resources,reducing the health of the tree. • f (� sk Photo 2.An example of a pruning cut with woundwood(left),and an example cross section of a trunk with reaction wood and decay in the center of the trunk(right). Epicormic Growth. Epicormic growth is the development of lateral buds that typically lay dormant beneath the bark. These dormant buds typically emerge due to stress-related issues(e.g.,mechanical damage, environmental change, crown thinning or dieback, heavy pruning,root death, or a change in the water table). Many of the trees in the project area exhibited signs of new or dead epicormic growth. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS The tree conditions were visually examined from the ground up;the Arborist is not able to determine the state of the roots during this type of survey. The following recommendations are to improve the health and structure of the trees that will be retained on site. If the trees will be preserved on site,LSA can provide further information for Tree Retention Measures for construction impact minimization, irrigation, structural pruning, and maintenance. LSA recommends that the 116 trees inventoried with a 0 rating(Dead) and the 123 trees inventoried with a I rating(Extreme Problems)be removed to(1)reduce the pest infestation; (2)lessen fuel load in the event of a wildfire; and, (3)particularly with the large dead eucalyptus trees,reduce risk of trees or tree parts striking people, equipment, or infrastructure in the event of failure. The health of the Extreme Problem trees is unlikely to improve in any significant way; most of these trees have extensive pest infestation problems,poor structure,and extensive dead and diseased wood. Although many of the 93 trees inventoried with a 2 rating(Poor)have major problems with health and structure,the condition of these trees could be improved by following the recommendations provided 7/5/16aP:\SWT1601\SWT1601_ArboristReporr rev070516.docx> 5 14S LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. in the Tree Attribute Table(attached). After the recommended actions are completed,the tree's rating may be raised to a 3. The remaining 24 trees with a 3 or 4 rating would likely benefit from the following recommendations. Pruning Pruning treatments should be repeated every few years, as needed,to control weight distribution, with no more than 10 percent of foliage removed, if possible. This is extremely important for mature trees that lack the resources to develop new woundwood as effectively as younger trees. All pruning should be directed by an ISA Certified Arborist and performed by an ISA Certified Tree Worker in accordance with the Best Management Practices for Pruning by the ISA,and should adhere to the most recent editions of the American National Standards Institute for Tree Care Operations and Pruning A300. All tree work(i.e.,pruning,removal, and planting) should be performed by a State Licensed Tree Contractor who can provide proof of commercial insurance coverage. Irrigation The current irrigation system appears to be nonoperational. The majority of the surveyed trees appear stressed from lack of water. Generally,trees should be deeply watered no more than once per week. However, a tree may need more or less watering depending on weather conditions(e.g.,rainfall, wind, and temperature). The best way to judge water needs is by checking the soil around the tree. If the soil is completely dry,the tree should be watered. If the soil is wet, there are probably several days before the tree needs more water. Different tree species have very different watering needs and some trees grow very well in conditions that others cannot tolerate. A general rule for watering trees is to apply 5 gallons of water per inch of trunk diameter. This is best applied at a slow rate. To encourage outward root growth,water should be applied at the drip line rather than next to the trunk. Watering next to the trunk can encourage circling roots,which can girdle and suffocate the tree. Deep watering and watering in the appropriate amount is important because it encourages deeper root growth. Roots generally grow within the top 18 inches of soil,but when shallowly watered(or in too little quantities)many roots will tend to grow in the top 6 inches. Deeper roots contribute to drought hardiness and anchorage strength. Pest Control Controlling movement up and down the stem with physical barriers can interrupt the lifecycles of many caterpillars. Insecticides can also be used to kill the insects. Healthier trees are less likely to become infested and can withstand the impact of an insect attack. Keeping trees healthy is the best way to prevent infestation by boring insects. This includes proper pruning,watering,mulching, and fertilization. Pruning should be done in late fall or winter to avoid attracting insects to open wounds. Dead or fallen wood should be removed immediately. Once borers are present, control becomes extremely difficult,but steps should be taken to prevent further damage and to stop the borers from spreading to surrounding trees. 7/5/16aP:\SWT1601\SWT1601_ArboristRepon rev070516.docx>, 6 2 44/� LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Horticultural oil can be used as a control for scale insects during the growing season or as a preventative treatment during the dormant winter season,preventing insects from overwintering. Insecticidal soap is a safe and effective control against many sucking insects and is recommended as a first response against insect attacks. In some cases, due to the size of the tree, spraying is not an option. In these cases,the insecticide is injected directly into the tree's trunk or applied by watering the treatment onto the tree's roots. The insecticide is then taken up through the tree's roots and dispersed throughout the tree. This is a good treatment when a tree has been repeatedly attacked by sucking insects over several years and a stronger treatment is required. Mulching Mulching is one of the most beneficial practices that can be done for the health of a tree, if applied properly. Organic mulch composed of plant byproducts(e.g., shredded bark,hardwood chips, and pine needles)has the beneficial results of(1) a source of slow-release nutrients, (2)improvement of soil structure by creating an organic layer, (3)maintaining moisture,(4)reduced competition from weeds and turf,(5)moderate temperature fluctuations, and(6) gives landscapes a well-groomed appearance. The application of mulch should be 2 to 4 inches in depth. Mulch should not be placed directly against the trunk of the tree, as direct contact may lead to bacterial or fungal infections, rodent feeding, and insects. The broader the diameter of the mulch,the more effective the mulch. The diameter of recommended mulch depends on the caliper of the tree at 4.5 ft above the ground surface (DBH). For a tree with a DBH of 1 to 2 inches, a 6 ft diameter mulch circle is recommended. Excess mulch depth often has detrimental effects on tree health by restricting water and gas exchange with the roots,which can result in(1)root rot and death,(2)girdling roots,(3) limiting nitrogen availability(the most important nutrient to trees), and (4) can affect soil pH,which will limit the nutrients available for root uptake. Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act Numerous large trees are present on site that may provide nesting habitat for raptors and other migratory birds protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Consequently, it would be prudent to perform any vegetation removal outside the avian nesting period,which typically extends between February and September, or to conduct nesting bird surveys prior to vegetation removal. DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Arborists are tree specialists who use their education,knowledge, training, and experience to examine trees,recommend measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees, and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees. Clients may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the Arborist or to seek additional advice. Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Certain conditions are often hidden within trees or below the ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances or for a specific period of time. Likewise, remedial treatments cannot be guaranteed. Trees can be managed but they cannot be controlled. To 7/5/16aP:\SWT1601\SWT1601_ArboristRepon rev070516.docx>, 7 � / 21 5 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. live near trees is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to remove all risk from trees is to remove all trees. I have personally inspected the trees and/or property referred to in this report and have stated my findings accurately. The extent of the evaluation and appraisal is stated in this report. I have no current or prospective interest in the vegetation or the property that is the subject of this report and I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. The analysis,opinions, and conclusions stated herein are my own and are based on current scientific procedures and facts. My compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined conclusion that favors the cause of the client or any other party or upon the results of the assessment,the attainment of stipulated results,or the occurrence of any subsequent events. My analysis,opinions, and conclusion were developed and this report has been prepared according to commonly accepted arboricultural practices. I further certify that I am a Certified Arborist and Certified Tree Risk Assessor by the ISA. If you have any questions or comments,please contact me at(949) 553-0666 or at leo.simone@lsa.net. Sincerely, LSA ASSOCIATES,INC. Leo Simone Associate Biologist ISA Certified Arborist/Tree Risk Assessor Attachments: References Tree Attribute Table Figures 1 and 2 7/5/16aP:\SWT1601\SWT1601_ArboristRepon rev070516.docx» 8 14 0 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE HEALTH ASSESSMENT REPORT JULY 2016 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GASPLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA REFERENCES California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC). CalWeedMapper. Website: http://calweedmapper.cal- ipc.orghnaps/?species-140.Accessed May 12,2016. Cope,Amy B. 1992.Juniperus califomica. In: Fire Effects Information System, Online. United States Department of Agriculture,Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory(Producer). Website: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis. Accessed May 2016. Dunster,Julian A.,E. Thomas Smiley,Nelda Matheny, and Sharon Lilly. 2013. "Tree Risk Assessment Manual."Champaign, Illinois: International Society of Arboriculture. Gilman, Edward. 2002. Urban and Community Forestry Factsheet No. 35,Codominant Stems.An illustrated guide to pruning. Second edition. Albany,NY: Delmar. Website: http://www.umass.edu/urbantree/factsheets/35codominantstems_revI.html. Accessed May 2016. International Society of Arboriculture. American National Standards Institute for Tree Care Operations and Pruning A300. 2011. Palms. Updated 1998 and 2004. Website: http://www.treesaregood.com/treecare/resources/pahns.pdf. Accessed May 2016. 1995-2016. "Schinus molle Tree Record."Website: http://selectree.calpoly.edu/tree- detail/schinus-molle. Accessed May 12,2016. United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Plant Guide. Website: http://plants.usda.gov/plantguide/pdf/cs_wafi.pdf.Accessed May 12,2016. University of California. 2016. California Tree Failure Report Program. Failure Photos. January. Website: http://ucanr.edu/sites/treefail/Failure_Photos/. Accessed May 2016. 2014. "Post a Question."California Tree Failure Report Program. Website: http://ucanr.edu/sites/treefaiVPost_a_Question/?close�yes/. Accessed April 12,2016. . 2010. California Tree Failure Report Program. Archives.March. Website: http://ucanr.edu/sites/treefail/Post a_Question/Archives/, accessed May 2016. P:\SWT1601\SWT1601_ArbonstRepon rev 070516.docx a07/05/16>, 247 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE HEALTH ASSESSMENT REPORT JULY 2016 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GASPLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA TREE ATTRIBUTE TABLE Tree Common Health No. Scientific Name Name DBH Rating Notes 001 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 5" 2 Control pest infestation;prune dead wood no more than 10%and live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 002 Myoporum laetum Myoponun Multitrunk 7", 2 Prune dead wood no more than 100/.and live 3",3",2",2" wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 003 Myoporum laetum Myo ovum Multitrunk 0 Dead;recommend removal. 004 Eucalvptus camaldulensis Red River 18" 3 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no gum greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 005 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 8", 2 Control pest infestation;prune dead wood 6",5",3" and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 006 Myoporum laetum M o omm Multitrunk 0 Dead;recommend removal. 007 Eucalyptus camaldulensis Red River 14" 0 Dead;recommend removal;may be m hazardous if there is a target. 008 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 10" 0 Dead;recommend removal;may be hazardous if there is a target. 009 Eucalyptus conodora Lemon Multitrunk 12", 3 Codominant trunks;prune dead wood and scented gum 8",6" 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 010 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 5", 2 Control pest infestation;prune dead wood 4" 4" 3" and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 011 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitmnk 6", 2 Control pest infestation;puma dead wood 4" and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation, 012 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 4" 1 Prostrate growth;tree has issues that are not correctable. 013 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 6", 2 Control pest infestation;prune dead wood 2" and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 014 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 5", 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;tree 4" 2" 2" 2" has issues that are not correctable. 015 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 4", 1 Prostrate growth;tree has issues that are not 3",3" correctable. 016 Eucalyptus polyanthemos Silver dollar 19" 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; m recommend removal. 017 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 8", 1 Extensive dead limbs;tree has issues that are 6",5",4",1", not correctable. I" 018 M o orum laetum Myoporum p Multitrunk 0 Dead;rot at base;recommend removal. 019 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 6", 1 Prostrate growth;poor structure;tree has 5",3",3" issues that are not correctable. 020 Myoporum laetum Myopomm 7.5" 2 Control pest infestation;prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 021 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Mulutrunk 5", 1 Pest infestation;poor structure;excessive 3",3" dead wood;tree has issues that are not correctable. 022 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 5", 1 Pest infestation;poor structure;excessive 5",3",3" deadwood;tree has issues that are not correctable. L23Myo orum laetum M o mm 0 Dead;recommend removal. M o orum laetum M op orum 0 Dead;recommend removal. Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 4", 1 Pest infestation;poor structure;excessive 4",4",3",3", dead wood;tree has issues that are not 3",2" correctable. P:\SWT1601\SWT1601_ArboristReport_rev 070516.docx a07/05/16o Mage I of15 -1d 8 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE HEALTH ASSESSMENT REPORT JULY 2016 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GASPLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA TREE ATTRIBUTE TABLE Tree Common Health No. Scientific Name Name DBH Rating Notes 026 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 10.5" 0 Dead;bark beetle damage;recommend removal;may be hazardous if there is a target. 027 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 83" 1 Dead branches;girdling roots;tree has issues that are not correctable. 028 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 8", 2 Prostrate growth;control pest infestation; 7" 4" 3" 2" prune dead wood and 10%of five wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 029 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 8" 2 Control pest infestation;prune dead wood and 10%of five wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 030 M o orum laetam M o omm 0 Dead;recommend removal. 031 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 28" 1 Tree was topped;dead branches;has issues that are not correctable;may be hazardous if there is a target. 032 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 4" 1 Sprout growth;has issues that are not correctable. 033 Myoporum laetwn M o omm Multitrunk 0 Dead;recommend removal. 034 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 6", 1 Dead branches;pest infestation;has issues 5",4",3",2", that are not correctable. V, 035 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 6", 2 Control pest infestation;prune dead wood 6",4",4" and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 036 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 6" 2 Prune dead woad and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 037 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 3", 1 Excessive dead branches;has issues that are 3",1",1" not correctable. 038 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 5", 1 Excessive dead branches;has issues that are 5",4",3" not correctable. 039 M o porum laetum Myopporma Multitrunk 0 Dead;recommend removal. 040 M o ovum laetum M o omm Multitrunk 0 Dead;recommend removal. 041 Myoporum laetum Myopomm 1 Offshoot from tank base;has issues that are not correctable. 042 M o porum laelum Myopporma Multitrunk 0 Dead;recommend removal. 043 Schinus molle Peruvian 5.5" 3 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no pepper greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 044 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; recommend removal. 045 Myoporum laelum Myopomm Multmunk 7", 1 Split at root base;prune;has issues that are 5",5",4" not correctable. 046 Myo ovum laetum M o omm 0 Dead;recommend removal. 047 Myoporum laelum Myopomm Multitmnk 10", 1 Dead branches;pest infestation;has issues 7" that are not correctable. 048 Myoporum laetum Myopomm 0 Dead;recommend removal. 049 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk 0 Dead;massive tree;may be hazardous if there is a target;recommend removal. 050 Eucalvptus sp. Eucalyptus 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; recommend removal. 051 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 0 Dead;recommend removal. 052 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 0 Dead;recommend removal. L054 Sehinus molle Peruvian Multitmnk 5", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no pepper 4" greater than 2"in diameter;provide sir lemental irri ation. Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk I", 1 Dead branches;pest infestation;has issues I%ill,1" that are not correctable. P:\SWT1601\SWT1601_ArboristReport_rev 070516.docx a07/05/16o Page 2 o/f� 15 1_T n' LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE HEALTH ASSESSMENT REPORT JULY 2016 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GASPLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA TREE ATTRIBUTE TABLE Tree Common Health No. Scientific Name Name DBH Rating Notes 055 MVopaum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 8", 1 Dead branches;pest infestation;has issues 5",4" that are not correctable. 056 Schinus Molle Peruvian Multitrunk 9", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no pepper 8",5",4",4" greater than 2"in diameter,provide supplemental irrigation. 057 Myoporum laetmn Myopomm 0 Dead;recommend removal. 058 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 8", 1 Half of the tree is dead;has issues that are not 4",4",3",3", correctable. 2" 059 Eucalyptus polyanthemos Silver dollar 15.5" 3 Remove Adjacent leaning tree;prune dead gum woad and 10%of live woad no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 060 Myoporum laetum M o orum Multitrunk 0 Dead;recommend removal. 061 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 12" 1 Leaning on adjacent tree No.59;has issues that are not correctable;recommend removal. 062 Eucalyptus polyanthemos Silver dollar 14" 1 Prostrate growth;leaning against dead tree; gum has issues that are not correctable;likely to fall;recommend removal. 063 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitmnk 4", 1 Half of the tree is dead;has issues that are not 4" correctable. 064 Eucaltptus Be. Eucalyptus 0 Dead;supporting tree No.62;recommend removal. 065 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitmnk 5", 2 Prone dead wood and 10%of live wood no 4",4" greater than2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 066 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 5", 1 Excessive dead wood;pest infestation;has 3",1" issues that are not correctable. 067 Schinus Molle Peruvian Multitrunk 10", 3 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no pepper 8",4" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 068 Schinus molle Peruvian Multitmnk 12", 2 Large prostrate limb;codominant trunk; pepper 10",7" income dead wood and 10%of rive wood no greater than2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 069 Eucalyptus polyanthemos Silver dollar Multitrunk 8", 1 Excessive dead wood;epicormic growth;has gum 6",4",3",3", issues that are not correctable. 2" 070 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 22" 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; recommend removal. 071 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 20" 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; recommend removal. 072 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 20" 4 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 073 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target recommend removal. 074 Eucalyptus Be. Eucalyptus Multitrunk 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; recommend removal. 075 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 6", 1 Excessive dead wood;pest infestation;has 4",3" issues that are not correctable. 076 Schinus molle Peruvian Multitrunk 9", 2 Pmne dead wood and 10%of live wood no pepper 8" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation, 077 Schinus mope Peruvian Multitmnk 7", 3 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no pepper 6",4" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 078 Myoporum laetum Myopomm 3" 1 Excessive dead wood;pest infestation;has issues that are not correctable. P:\SWT1601\SWT1601_ArboristReport_rev 070516.docx a07/05/16o Mage 3 Of 15 150 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE HEALTH ASSESSMENT REPORT JULY 2016 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GASPLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA TREE ATTRIBUTE TABLE Tree Common Health No. Scientific Name Name DBH Rating Notes 079 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk 20", 1 The main tree is dead;live suckers may be 3",3",3" hazardous if there is a target;recommend removal. 080 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 5" 1 Excessive dead wood;pest infestation;has issues that are not correctable. 081 Eucalyptus polyanthemos Silver dollar Multitrunk 12", 1 Extensive insect damage;has issues that are gum 6" not correctable;may be.hazardous if there is a target. 082 Myoporum laetum Myoponun 6" 1 Excessive dead wood;pest infestation;has issues that are not correctable. 083 Eucalyptus sp.(planted Eucalyptus 2"or less 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no sapling) greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 084 Eucalyptus sp.(planted Eucalyptus 2"or less 2 Prone dead wood.and 10%of live wood no sapling) greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 085. Eucalyptus sp.(planted Eucalyptus 2"or less 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no sapling) greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 086 Eucalyptus sp.(planted Eucalyptus 2"or less 2 Remove stakes;prune dead wood and 10%of sapling) live wood no greater than 2"in diameter; provide supplemental irrigation. 087 Eucalyptus sp.(planted Eucalyptus 2"or less 2 Remove stakes;prune dead wood and 10%of sapling) live wood no greater than 2"in diameter; provide supplemental irrigation, 088 Eucalvpncs sp.(planted Eucalyptus 2"or less 2 Remove stakes;prune dead wood and 10%of sapling) live wood no greater than 2"in diameter; provide supplemental irrigation. 089 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 8.5", 1 Tree is 90%dead;has issues that are not 7",5" correctable. 090 Eucalyptus polyanthemos Silver dollar Multitrunk 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; gum 11.5", 11.5" recommend removal. 091 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 5", 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;tree 4",4" has issues that are not correctable. 092 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 5" 1 Extensive suckers;pest infestation;poor structure;tree has issues that are not correctable. 093 Eucalyptus sp. 7" 0 Dead;recommend removal. 094 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 7" 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 095 Mvo orum laetum Myopporurn Multitmnk 0 Dead;recommend removal. 096 Eucalyptus polyanthemos Silver dollar Multitrunk 18", 0 Dead;maybe hazardous if there is a target; gum 7" recommend removal. 097 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 5 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no 5" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 098 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 6", 3 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no 5",4" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 099 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 3 1 Extensive suckers;pest infestation;poor 2" structure;tree has issues that are not correctable. F10 Eucalyptus polyanthemos Silver dollar 12" 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; gum recommend removal. Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 7.5", 3 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no 3" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 102 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multurunk 6", 1 Decay at base;excessive dead wood;tree has 6",4" issues that are not correctable. P:\SWT1601\SWT1601_ArboristReport_rev 070516.docx a07/05/161> Page 4 of)5 151 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE HEALTH ASSESSMENT REPORT JULY 2016 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GASPLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA TREE ATTRIBUTE TABLE Tree Common Health No. Scientific Name Name DBH Rating Notes 103 Eucalyptus polyanthemos Silver dollar Multitrunk 16. 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; m 5",6" recommend removal. 104 Schinus molle Peruvian 9" 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no pepper greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 105 Myoporum laetam Myopomm Multitmolr 4", 1 Excessive dead branches;poor Structure;pest 3',3" infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 106 Eucalyptus eitriodora Lemon 12" 2 Prune dead wood and l0%of live wood no scented gum greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 107 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 5", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood n0 5",5",4",4", greater than 2"in diameter;provide 4",3" supplemental irri ation. 108 Eucalyptus s . Eucalyptus 5" 0 Dead;recommend removal. 109 Myoporum laetum M o orum 4" 0 Dead;recommend removal. 110 Eucalyptus polvanthemos Silver dollar Multitrunk 15", 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; gum 14",12" recommend removal. 111 Schinus molle Peruvian Muldtmnk 4", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no pepper 4",3" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 112 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 3", 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest 3", I" infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 113 Myoporum laetum Myopomm 6" 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 114 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon 9" 3 Prone dead wood and 10%of live woad no scented gum greater than 2"in diameter;provide Supplemental irrigation. 115 Eucalyptus polvanthemos Silver dollar 9" 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; um recommend removal. 116 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 6.5" 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 117 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 6.5", 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest 6" infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 118 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 5.5", 2 Dieback at tips;rootbound;prune dead wood 2" and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 119 M o orum laetum Myoporurn Prostrate trunk 0 Dead;recommend removal. 120 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 8" 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 121 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 13" 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; recommend removal. 122 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 8" 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 123 Eucalyptus ciolodora Lemon Multitrunk 13", 3 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no scented gum 10",6" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 124 Eucalyptus conferruminata Bushy yate 8" 1 Significant lean;presence of fungus;tree has issues that are not correctable;may be hazardous if there is a target. 125 Myoporum laetum Myopormn 5" 2 Prune dead wood and l0%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. P:\SWT1601\SWT1601_ArboristReport_rev 070516.docx a07/05/16a Page 5 of 15 2152 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE HEALTH ASSESSMENT REPORT JULY 2016 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GASPLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA TREE ATTRIBUTE TABLE Tree Common Health No. Scientific Name Name DBH Rating Notes 126 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitmnk 10", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no 6",5",4",4", greater than 2"in diameter;provide 4",3" supplemental irrigation. 127 Eucalyptus conferruminata Bushy yate 8" 0 Dead;prostrate;fungus present,;recommend removal. 128 Eucalyptus conferroninala Bushyyate Multitrunk 5", 0 Dead;recommend removal. 4" 4" 129 Quercus sp. Oak 5" 2 Remove stakes Bad ties;prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 130 Quercus sp. Oak 5" 3 Remove stakes and ties;prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 131 Schinus molle Peruvian Multitrunk 4", 2 Prune dead woodand 10%of live wood no pepper 3",2",2" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 132 Quercus sp. Oak 2" 2 Remove stakes and ties;prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 133 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Maltitrunk 3", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no 2",2",2",2" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 134 Eucalyptus polyanthemos Silver dollar Multitrunk, 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; gum large recormnend removal. 135 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 2" 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 136 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk4", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no 2",2",2",1", greater than 2"in diameter;provide 11, 1" supplemental irrigation. 137 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 2", 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest 2" infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 138 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk 5", 0 Dead;recommend removal. 5" 4" 4" 3" 139 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 2" 1 Poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 140 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 2" 1 Poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that me not correctable. 141 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 2" 1 "U"trunk;pest infestation;tree has issues that am not correctable. 142 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 5", 2 Control pests;prune dead wood and 10%of 4" live wood no greater than 2"in diameter; provide supplemental irrigation. 143 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 34.5" 2 Codominant trunks;control pests;prune dead woad and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemenml irrigation. 144 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 2" 2 Control pests;prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter; provide supplemental irrigation. 145 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 6" 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; recommend removal. 146 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk, 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; large recommend removal. 147 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 4", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no 3",2" greater than 2"in diameter,provide supplemental irrigation. P:\SWT1601\SWT1601_ArboristReport_rev 070516.docx a07/05/16o Page 6 of 15 15S LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE HEALTH ASSESSMENT REPORT JULY 2016 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GASPLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA TREE ATTRIBUTE TABLE Tree Common Health No. Scientific Name Name DBH Rating Notes 148 Mvoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 4", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no 3",3",3" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 149 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 11" 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; recommend removal. 150 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk2.5", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no 2" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 151 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk 4", 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; 3",3",2" recommend removal. 152 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 6", 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest 5",5",4',4", infestation;tree has issues that me not 4" correctable. 153 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 5", 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest 4" 2" 2" 2" infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 154 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Stump 1 Resprouting from stump;excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 155 Eucalyptus cttriodora Lemon 61, 2 Partially dead branches;tree has issues that scented gum we not correctable. 156 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 1.5", 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest 1.5",1.5" infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 157 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 5", 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest 4" 3" 2" 2" infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 158 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk,[", 1 Excessive dead branches;poor stmcture;pest 4",3" infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 159 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 11" 1 Two-thirds dead;may be hazardous if there is a target;recommend removal. 160 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 5.5" 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; recommend removal. 161 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 2", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no 2" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 162 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 7" 0 Dead;recommend removal. 163 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 2" 2 Prone dead wood and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 164 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitmnk 6.5", 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; 3" recommend removal. 165 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 8" 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; recommend removal. 166 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 6", 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest 3",3",2" infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 167 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 28" 1 Three-fourths dead;codominant trunks;may be hazardous if there is a target;recommend removal. 168 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 2" 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 169 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk I 1", I Primary trunk is dead;excessive dead 3" branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 170 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk 5", 0 Dead;recommend removal. 5" P:\SWT1601\SWT1601_ArboristReport_rev 070516.docx a07/05/16o Page 7 of 15 25.4 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE HEALTH ASSESSMENT REPORT JULY 2016 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GASPLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA TREE ATTRIBUTE TABLE Tree Common Health No. Scientific Name Name DBH Rating Notes 171 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 14" 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; recommend removal. 172 Schinus Molle Peruvian Multitrunk 3 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no pepper 6",6" greater than 2"in diameter,provide supplemental irrigation. 173 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk 10", 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; 8" recommend removal. 174 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk 12", 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; 10" recommend removal. 175 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 111, 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; recommend removal. 176 Schinus molle Peruvian Multitrunk 4", 1 Codominant trunks;excessive dead branches; pepper 3" poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 177 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk 11", 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; 101,8" recommend removal. 178 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Dead stump 0 Dead;recommend removal. 179 Schinus Molle Peruvian 2.5" 1 Previously toped crown;excessive dead pepper branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 180 Myoporum laeoun Myopomm 2" 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 181 Myoporum laetwn Myopomm 3.5" 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 182 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 4", 1 Rot decay at base;prostrate growth; 2" excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 183 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitmnk 12", 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; 10" recommend removal. 184 M o porum laetum M o mm 2" 0 Dead;recommend removal. 185. Eucalyptuspolyanthemos Silver dollar 9" 0 Dead;maybe hazardous if there is a target; gum recommend removal. 186 Eucalyptus c4nodora Lemon Multitrunk 5", 2 Codominant murk;prune dead wood and scented gum 5" 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 187 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 3", 1 Sprouted from stump base;root plate lifting; 2",2",1" excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 188 Eucalyptus s . Eucalyptus 14" 0 Dead;root rot;likely to fall into facility. 189 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk 6", 1 Four suckers coming from horizontal trunk; 5",5",4" excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 190 Schinus molle Peruvian Multimurk 3", 1 Three-fourths dead;decay and dieback; pepper 2" 2" 1" excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 191 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk 10"2 4 Prunc dead wood and 10%of live wood no 9" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 192 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 5", 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest 2",2" infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 193 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multinunk 3", 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest 2",2" infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. P:\SWT1601\SWT1601_ArboristReport_rev 070516.docx a07/05/16o Page 8 of 15 1515 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE HEALTH ASSESSMENT REPORT JULY 2016 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GASPLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA TREE ATTRIBUTE TABLE Tree Common Health No. Scientific Name Name DBH Rating Notes 194 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 9" 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; recommend removal. 195 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk, 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; large recommend removal. 196 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multhrunk 4", 0 Dead;recommend removal. 3",3",3",2", 2" 1" 197 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 2", 0 Dead;recommend removal. 2" 2" 2" 198 Schinus molle Peruvian Multitrunk 6", 2 Codominant trunks at base;prune dead wood pepper 4",4",3" and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 199 Schinus molle Peruvian Multmunk 4", 2 Codominant trunks at base;prune dead wood pepper Y,2",2-,1" and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 200 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 2.5" 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 201 Eucalyptus sp. Eucal ms 2.5" 0 Dead;recommend removal. 202 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 4", 0 Dead;recommend removal. 3" 2" 203 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 4", 1 Tbree-fourths dead;excessive dead branches; 3",2", 1" poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 204 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 10" 0 Root plate uplift;dead;may be hazardous if there is a target;recommend removal. 205 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multhrunk 3", 1 Three-fourths dead;excessive dead.branches; 2" P,1" poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 206 Eucalyptus citnodora Lemon 8" 3 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no scented gum greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 207 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 12" 1 Significant pest damage;likely to fall into wall;recommend removal. 208 Myo omm laetum Myo orum 0 Dead;recommend removal. 209 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 6" 1 Excessive dead branches;poorstructure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 210 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk, 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target large recommend removal. 211 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk, 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; large recommend removal. 212 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 5" 1 Constricted trunk due to stakes and ties; excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 213 Eucaly lux sp. Eucalyptus 2.5" 0 Dead;recommend removal. 214 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 28" 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; recommend removal. 215 Schinus molle Peruvian Multitrunk 5", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no pepper 4" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 216 Schinus molle Peruvian Multitrunk 4", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no pepper 4",3" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; L217 ; recommend removal. P:\SWT1601\SWT1601_ArboristReport_rev 070516.docx a07/05/16o Page 9 of 15 150 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE HEALTH ASSESSMENT REPORT JULY 2016 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GASPLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA TREE ATTRIBUTE TABLE Tree Common Health No. Scientific Name Name DBH Rating Notes 218 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 22" 1 Three-fourths dead;leaning toward facility; excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 219 Eucalvptus eitriadora Lemon 12" 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no scented gum greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 220 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrank4", 1 Three-fourths dead;excessive dead branches; 3",2",2" poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 221 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk, 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest large infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 222 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon 13" 2 Prone dead wood and 10%of live wood no scented gum greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 223 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon 13" 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest scented gum infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 224 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon Multitrunk 9", 1 Codominant trunks;excessive dead branches; scented gum 6" poor stmctum;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 225 Eucalyptus citnodora Lemon 13" 2 prone dead wood and 10%of live wood no scented gum greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 226 Eucalyptus sp.. Eucal tus 2" 0 Dead;recommend removal. 227 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk, 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest large infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 228 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk, 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; large recommend removal. 229 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 18" 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; recommend removal. 230 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 6", 1 Wilted leaves;dying;excessive dead 2",2" branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 231 Myoporum laetum Myopomm 8" 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 232 Myopomm laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 8", 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest 2",2",1" infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 233 Myopomm laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 6", 1 Prostrate growth;rot and root decay; 6",4",3" excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 234 Afropaum laetum Myoporum 8" 1 Two-thirds dead branches;excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 235 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 17" 1 Five-sixths dead branches;excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 236 Eucalyptus citnodora Lemon 17" 4 Pmne dead wood and 10%of live wood no scented gum greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 237 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 6", 3 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no 4" greater than 2"in diameter,provide supplemental irrigation. P:\SWT16O1\SWT1601_ArboristReport_rev 070516.docx a07/05/161> Page 10 of 15 :L57 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE HEALTH ASSESSMENT REPORT JULY 2016 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GASPLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA TREE ATTRIBUTE TABLE Tree Common Health No. Scientific Name Name DBH Rating Notes 238 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 5", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no 4" 4" 4" 4" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 239 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 2" 0 Dead;recommend removal. 240 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 4", 2 Rootbound;prime dead wood and 10%of 3" live wood no greater than 2"in diameter; provide supplemental irrigation, 241 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 7", 2 Prostrate trunk;prune dead wood and 10%of 6",3",3" live wood no greater than 2"in diameter; provide supplemental irrigation. 242 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 12" 1 Two-thirds dead;excessive dead branches; poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 243 Eucalyptus s . Eucalyptus 11" 0 Dead;recommend removal. 244 Myoporum laetum Myoporam Multitrunk 11", 0 Dead;recommend removal. 6" 4" 245 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 6", 2 Prone dead wood and 10%of live wood no 6",5" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 246 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 7" 1 Prostrate growth;will fall down hill; excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 247 Eucalyptus cttriodora Lemon 11" 1 Two-thirds dead;excessive dead branches; scented gum poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 248 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 10", 0 Dead;recommend removal. 4" 249 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus to,, 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; recommend removal. 250 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 10" 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; recommend removal. 251 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitmnk 3", 1 Rootbound;leaning downhill;excessive dead 2",1" branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 252 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus fill 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; recommend removal. 253 Myoponan laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 3", 2 Rootbound;leaning downhill;prune dead 2%2"1 1" wood and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 254 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitmnk 2", 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest 2" infestation;tree has issues thatare not correctable. 255 Eucalyptus sideroaylon Red ironbark 12" 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; recommend removal. 256 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 11" 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; recommend removal. 257 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk, 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target laze recommend removal. 258 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk, 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; large recommend removal. 259 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 5", 2 Rootbound;emergent from stump;prune 4",3",3",3" dead wood and 10%of five wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 260 Myoporum laetum Myoponun Multitrunk 5", 2 Split at base of roots;prune dead wood and 4" 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide su lemental irri anon. P:\SWT1601\SWT1601_ArboristReport_rev 070516.docx a07/05/161> Page 11 Of 15 2�� LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE HEALTH ASSESSMENT REPORT JULY 2016 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GASPLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA TREE ATTRIBUTE TABLE Tree Common Health No. Scientific Name Name DBH Rating Notes 261 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 3", 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest 2" infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 262 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 6", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no 3%3",2" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 263 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitmnk 3", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no 2" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 264 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk 5", 0 Dead;recommend removal. 3" 265 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 3", 0 Dead;recommend removal. 2" 266 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 8", 0 Dead;recommend removal. 7" 5" 267 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 5", 1 Split trunk;excessive dead branches;poor 5",4" stracHne;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 268 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrack 4", 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest 4",2" infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 269 Eucaltptua eitKodora Lemon W,, 2 Prune dead wood and l0%of live wood no scented gum greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 270 Eucalyptus sp. 22" 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; recommend removal. 271 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 7", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live woad no 5",5",4" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 272 Myoporum laetum Myopomm 4" 1 Tree is leaning downhill;excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 273 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 5", 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest 4",4",3",3" infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 274 Eucalyptus e0riodora Lemon 7" 1 Excessive dead branches;poor structure;pest scented gum infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 275 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 4", 0 Dead;recommend removal. 4" 3" 276 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 8", 1 Three-fourths dead;excessive dead branches; 5" poor structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 277 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 8", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no 4" 4" 3" 2" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 278 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 14", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no 6",4" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 279 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 5", 3 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no 5",5" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 280 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 6", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no 6" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 281 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitruak 6", 1 Split at base;excessive dead branches;poor 5" structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. P:\SWT1601\SWT1601_ArboristReport_rev 070516.docx a07/05/16o Page 12 of 15 ZJ9 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE HEALTH ASSESSMENT REPORT JULY 2016 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GASPLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA TREE ATTRIBUTE TABLE Tree Common Health No. Scientific Name Name DBH Rating Notes 282 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 14" 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 283 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk, 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; large recommend removal. 284 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrank 6", 1 Split at base;excessive dead branches;poor 4" structure;pest infestation;tree has issues that are not correctable. 285 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 3" 0 Dead;recommend removal. 286 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 4" 0 Dead;recommend removal. 287 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk, 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; large recommend removal. 288 Eucahptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitmnk, 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; large recommend removal. 289 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 5", 3 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no 5" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 290 Myaporum laetum Myopomm 5" 0 Dead;recommend removal. 291 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 7", 0 Dead;recommend removal. 7" 6" 4',4" 292 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 6.5" 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 293 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 2" 2 Prone dead wood and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 294 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk, 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; large recommend removal. 295 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 14" 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 296 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 4", 0 Dead;recommend removal. 3",3" 297 Eucalyptus polvanthemos Silver dollar Multitrunk, 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; gum large recommend removal. 298 Eucalyptus camaldulensis Red River 18" 3 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no gum greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 299 Myoporum laetum Myoponun Multitrunk 5", 0 Dead;recommend removal. 4" 3" 300 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitmnk 5", 0 Dead;recommend removal. 4„ 4„ 3" 3„ 301 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitmnk 3", 1 Extensive dead wood;tree has issues that are 2" not correctable. 302 Eucalyptus polyanthemos Silver dollar Multitrunk 14", 2 Codominant trunks;prune dead wood and gum 12" 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 303 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk 10", 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target 9",8" recommend removal. 304 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 5", 0 Dead;recommend removal. 4" 4" 305 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 15" 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; recommend removal. 306 Eucalyptus ciniodora Lemon 7.5" 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no scented gum greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 307 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Mulutrunk 5", 1 Codominant trunks;extensive dead wood; 4",3" tree has issues that are not correctable. 308 Myoporum laetum Myopomm 3" 1 Offshoot from topped trunk;tree has issues that are not correctable. P:\SWT1601\SWT1601_ArboristReport_rev 070516.docx a07/05/16o Page 13 of 15 100 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE HEALTH ASSESSMENT REPORT JULY 2016 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GASPLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA TREE ATTRIBUTE TABLE Tree Common Health No. Scientific Name Name DBH Rating Notes 309 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 4.5" 1 Offshoot from topped trunk;tree has issues that are not correctable. 310 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 5.5" 1 Offshoot from topped trunk;tree has issues that are not correctable. 311 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 5.5" 1 Prostrate,horizontal limbs;tree has issues that are not correctable. 312 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 8", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no 7",6",5" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 313 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitmnk 8", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no 5",4" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 314 Myoporum laetum Myoponun Multitrunk l 1", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no 9" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 315 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 7", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no 6",6" 5" 4" greater than 2"in diameter;provide 3" Supplemental irrigation. 316 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 2" 1 Topped;extensive dead wood;tree has issues that are not correctable. 317 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 5" 2 Prune dead woad and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 318 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 5", 2 Codominant trunks;prune dead wood and 5" 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 319 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 7", 1 Codominant trunks;extensive dead wood; 6" tree has issues that are not correctable. 320 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 6", 2 Codominant trunks;prune dead wood and 4" 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter,provide supplemental irrigation. 321 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 4", 2 Codominant trucks;prune dead wood and 4" 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 322 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 5", 1 Split trunks;girdling root;extensive dead 4",4" wood;tree has issues that are not correctable. 323 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 12", 1 One horizontal limb;root rot;extensive dead 1011,101, woad;tree has issues that are not correctable. 324 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 6", 0 Dead;recommend removal. 5",4" 325 Myoporum laetwn Myoporum Multitrunk 3", 0 Dead;recommend removal. 3" 2" 326 Myopomm laetum Myoporum 8" 2 Leaning,downhill;prune dead wood and 10% of live woad no greater than 2"in diameter; provide supplemental irrigation. 327 Myoponmt laetum Myoporum 8" 0 Dead;recommend removal. 328 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 3", 0 Dead;recommend removal. 2" 1" 329 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Mulutrunk 5", 2 Codominant trucks;prune dead wood and 4" 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter; pprovide supplemental irrigation. 330 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 6" 2 Leaning downhill;prune dead wood and 10% of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter; provide supplemental irrigation. 331 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitmnk 10", 2 Codominant trunks;prune dead wood and 5" 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 332 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon 20" 3 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no scented gum greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. P:\SWT1601\SWT1601_ArboristRepon_rev 070516.docx a07/05/161> Page 14 of 15 101 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE HEALTH ASSESSMENT REPORT JULY 2016 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GASPLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA TREE ATTRIBUTE TABLE Tree Common Health No. Scientific Name Name DBH Rating Notes 333 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 10", 1 Prostrate;rot at base;tree has issues that are 7" not correctable. 334 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 6", 0 Dead;recommend removal. 5" 4" 335 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 6" 1 Leaning;extensive dead wood;tree has issues that are not correctable. 336 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 3", 1 Leaning;extensive dead wood;tree has issues 3",3",3" that are not correctable. 337 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 8", 1 Topped;extensive dead wood;tree has issues 6",6",4" that are not correctable. 338 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 7", 1 Offshoot from dead[Walk;extensive dead 5" woad;tree has issues that are not correctable. 339 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 7", 1 Extensive dead wood;Hee has issues that are 5",5",4",4", not correctable. 3" 340 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 4", 1 Extensive dead wood;tree has issues that are 4",3" not correctable. 341 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 3", 2 Prone dead wood and 10%of live woad no 3%3" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 342 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 4", 2 Prone dead wood and 10%of live wood no 4" 3" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 343 Myoporum laetum Myopomm 3" 1 Dead wood;tree has issues that are not correctable. 344 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 111, 3 Supporting another leaning tree;prone dead wood and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 345 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 9", 2 Codominant trunks;girdling roots;prone 5" dead wood and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 346 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 5",4 2 Leaning;prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 347 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 1 Suckers;dead wood;tree has issues that me not correctable. 348 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus 7" 2 Leaning toward compound;prone dead wood Had 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 349 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Multitrunk, 0 Dead;may be hazardous if there is a target; large recommend removal. 350 Myoporum laetum Myopomtn 6" 1 Dead wood;tree has issues that are not correctable. 351 Myoporum laetum Myoporum Multitrunk 10", 2 Prune dead wood and 10%of live wood no 4" greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 352 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon 20" 3 Prone dead wood and 10%of live woad no scented gum greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. 353 Myopomm laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 8", 1 Codominant trunk;dead wood;tree has issues 4" that are not correctable. 354 Myoporum laetum Myopomm Multitrunk 8", 1 Split at base;dead wood;tree has issues that 7",4" are not correctable. 355 Myopomm laetum Myopomm 9" 2 Prone dead wood and 10%of live wood no greater than 2"in diameter;provide supplemental irrigation. DBH=diameter at breast height P:\SWT1601\SWT1601_ArboristReport_rev 070516.docx a07/05/16o Page 15 of 15 102 C r-� V y v w. LEV 47 0 10 ,a r - Project Location z',�r .-1 ��� U -- .4 .— t _ q r .,� 61,a a b mak J. Project Vicinity Orange ° - Count `--- / �— -------- '— -- �_ v.. Project Location \` � ., -- 910 LSA LEGEND FIGURE 1 0 Project Location Coyote Canyon Landfill LFG Plant a low 2000 Tree Health Assessment FEET SOURCE:USES 7.5'Quad-Laguna Beach(198 Q,CA Project Location and Vicinity I:\SWT1601\01S\Projectl-ocation_USGS.=d(7/5/2016) 1o3 19 • 5 • 237 238 18 • 239 29 28 17 4 •240 • • 27 •0 • 6 229 276 241 17 36 3 5 334 • 26 21 7 1a 6 3 2309 2• .35 • =42 :46 38 • •1 • 16 9 13 •2 1 •355 • 233 231 244 243 • 33 22• 15 • • 10 • •••4 5 249 32 25 • 4 yA 7 40 39 • • 23 11 247 12 • 353 • 35 248 4524 • • 352 46 • 41 • 48 42 •43 == 50 a 49 51 ♦ 66 ss Y • 62 53 + • 57 • 1 60 62 54 059 •• •FA , ///� i t 64 63 / 67 65 • 0 61 • •66 • / A � 11' 68 69 1 70 71 1 �1 73 J-4 76 77 74 •75 -79:78 •80 ;/i� 1 � ,r • 1 rrr • •1 .1 1 O 9d2.246 243 249 250 Y 247 252 2510 253 • • • 248 •350 254• 351 255 256 257 34: 349 •347 346 • 345 258 ♦ 262 259 343•• • 341 0 60 261 342 • 265 • 263 264 y • 269 •344 34• 339 267 296 0 338 9268 271 270 • 33: 335 •333 337• • 334 329 :72 — - 3320 • 274. 275 279 330 273 276 278 331 • • • 328 325 • • 327 324 277 •326 • 280 • 323 320 • • • 281 322 321 • 282 • • 3i9 • 317 318 •316 r_ •315 314 ... ., 274 279 • 275 278 325 •276 • 324 277 • 280 • Ale 323 320 • • • 281 285 322 321 • 282 • • 283 319 286 • 317 284 287 318 • • • •316 291 292 288 290 • •315 289 •293 • 313 312 095 298 314 • • 296 • 310 294 • 297 299 311 301 s09 • 3u9 • • 300 • •308 303 .•, Y� t 304 — � j. 307 306 • ///��� 306 s • i-f • 219 2 • ' 2 • 218 • 216 • .�� . 221 • zi7 •21 • 212 r 223 • 211 i r 224 207 l 208 • 210 • 209 205 206 • • bing 204 r 306 30 ~ ' 220 •19 216 • • 218 • 1 ♦ :21 • 217 0215 �'� • � 214 222 213. • 212 ua • 1 r • C •' 211 •• ` 224 207 l 208 • 210 +j • ZU9 205 206 • 204 d9A * 203• 202 200 • 201 795 • 225 194 227 193 197 226 • 796 192 � 190 • 198 4 0 188 189• • 1 143 187 140 • 145 14c 144 + 184 186 • 228 147 .151 154 183 185 • •150 • 182 148• • •179 ino :bs 165 tat • 180 177 152• 156 0 164 0 176• 175 • • 155 158 166 170 157 •59•160 169. 167 • i isa 161 0 162 • 178 173 174 163 0 172 171 bing /�! As ✓/ 61 ez , 27 RA 83 85 • • 84 • •86 r 89 / 91 093.%94 90 92 y 98 95 00 99 0 96 • 100 105 106 L 102 0 101 a 90A 104 103 1O7 112 714 109 110 113 771115 :17 • •116 • 118 123 119 0 120 •122 i • 21 125 =126 0 4 127 135 • • 134 428 136 138' 141 • • 137 129 y3233 138 743, 140 - 11 - 0 Bing TREE REPLACEMENT AND REVEGETATION PLAN COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS PLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA LSA July 2oIs 1o9 TREE REPLACEMENT AND REVEGETATION PLAN COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS PLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA Submitted to: OC Waste&Recycling 300 North Flower Street, Suite 400 Santa Ana, CA 92703 Prepared by: LSA Associates, Inc. 20 Executive Park,Suite 200 Irvine, California 92614 (949)553-0666 Project No. SWT 1601 LSA July 2ot6 17L) TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................i COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS PLANT TREE REPLACEMENT AND REVEGETATION PLAN...................................................................................................................... 1 TREEREMOVAL.................................................................................................................... 1 Treesto be Retained..................................................................................................... I Treesto be Removed....................................................................................................4 RemovalMonitor.........................................................................................................4 RemovalContractor.....................................................................................................4 Methodsof Removal....................................................................................................6 Schedule.......................................................................................................................6 REVEGETATION....................................................................................................................7 RevegetationMonitor...................................................................................................7 Revegetation Contractor...............................................................................................8 ErosionControl............................................................................................................9 Irrigation.......................................................................................................................9 Schedule.......................................................................................................................9 Installation Materials and Techniques..........................................................................9 Mulchand Fertilizer................................................................................................... 11 MAINTENANCE.................................................................................................................... 11 Long-term Maintenance............................................................................................. 12 FIGURES Figure 1: Tree Retention and Planting Plan............................................................................................2 Figure2: Trees to be Removed ..............................................................................................................5 TABLES TableA: Tree Rating System.................................................................................................................3 Table13: Retained Trees.........................................................................................................................3 TableC: Removed Trees........................................................................................................................4 Table D: Undesirable Species .................................................:..............................................................8 Table E: Replacement Tree List.............................................................................................................8 Table F: Erosion Control Seed Mix........................................................................................................8 APPENDIX A: NCCP CONSTRUCTION-RELATED MINIMIZATION MEASURES PASWT1601\Tree Replacement Plan\rise Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan.docx(07/27/16) 1 1�2 LEA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE REPLACEMENT AND EEVEGETATION PLAN JULY 2015 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS PLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS PLANT TREE REPLACEMENT AND REVEGETATION PLAN This Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan(Plan)for the Coyote Canyon Landfill Gas(LFG) Plant in the City of Newport Beach (City), County of Orange(County), California(Figure 1)provides guidelines for the removal of existing nonnative viewshed trees and the installation and maintenance of native viewshed trees and understory species within OC Waste and Recycling's (OCWR)property limits surrounding the LFG Plant(project area). This Plan has been prepared to satisfy Mitigation Measure (MM) 1 of Section 21c, and MMs 1, 2, and 4 of Section 2.IV.a. The purpose of this Plan is to remove the existing dead or unhealthy nonnative viewshed trees that currently exist in the project area and replace them with native viewshed trees. The retained and newly installed trees are expected to break up views of the LFG Plant walls and structures and temporary and permanent wireless telecommunication facilities that will be installed in the future. Although habitat creation/restoration is not a required element of this project,this revegetation effort will potentially provide habitat for native wildlife species. The City Fuel Modification Plans and Maintenance Standards for Developments (Standards) and the County Central and Coastal Subregion Natural Community Conservation Plan and Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP)were reviewed to ensure this Plan conforms to the requirements therein. The entire project area is within the NCCP Reserve. This Plan is designed to be a user-friendly document for use by all parties (i.e., the land owner,the monitors, and the contractors)associated with the removal and revegetation efforts.Additional technical documents (e.g., irrigation specifications)are not included at this planning stage but may be required in the future. It is recommended that the irrigation specifications address the existing irrigation system. TREE REMOVAL Trees to be Retained The determination of which trees are to be retained was based on review of the Coyote Canyon LFG Plant Tree Health Assessment(Assessment)performed by LSA Associates, Inc. in 2016 and the viewshed requirements of the LFG Plant. The Assessment identified 355 existing trees surrounding the perimeter of the LFG Plant; however, only 304 of the trees are within the project area. The remaining 41 trees are within the City of Irvine's Open Space. The Assessment was performed by certified arborists and each tree was given a rating from 0 to 4 based on the health of the tree (Table A). None of the trees with a rating of 0 or 1 (207 individuals)were considered for retention.All trees with a rating of 3 or 4 (18 individuals)were considered for retention, and 13 of these individuals were selected for retention. The decision to not retain the remaining five individuals was based on the viewshed contribution of the trees. Based on the analysis of the viewshed following retention of these 13 trees,a limited number of trees with a rating of 2 (80 individuals)were considered for retention P:\SWT1601\Tree Replacement Plan\rlso Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan.docx x07/27/16» 1 272 O • :. 1 > • 41 \ WN .�.�... .r��� 26 �u�Iuu� i�i Vii* • •..II�`'�,.:r`�I 005\, -� .: .•. I � O� .I I LEA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE REPLACEMENT AND EEVEGETATION PLAN JULY 2015 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS PLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA based on viewshed needs. A total of seven trees with a rating of 2 were selected for retention. Of the seven individuals to be retained, one oak(Quercus sp.)individual currently does not contribute to the viewshed; however,this individual may contribute to the viewshed in the future. A total of 20 trees were selected for retention(Table B, Figure 1). Table A: Tree Rating System Tree Rating Condition Description 0 Dead. Trees rated as a 0 have no significant sign of life. 1 Extreme Trees rated as a I have extreme problems with health and structure.These trees have Problems issues that are not correctable and may be hazardous if there is a target(i.e.,life or property) 2 Poor Trees rated as a 2 have major problems with health and structure but the tree's condition can be improved by fallowing the Arborist recommendations.After the recommended actions are completed,the tree's rating can be raised to a 3.These trees could pose a risk if there is a target and the recommended actions are not taken. 3 Fair Trees rated as a 3 have minor problems with health and structure and pose no immediate danger to a target.Minor defects can be minimized by following the Arborist recommendations. 4 Good Trees rated as a 4 have no apparent problems that can be seen by a Certified Arborist from visual ground inspection.Future hazards can be reduced or even averted by following Arborist recommendations to keep the tree in good structural and health conditions. Table B: Retained Trees Tree Number' Rating Species 004 3 Eucalyptus camaldulensis 009 3 Eucalyptus citriodora 059 3 Eucalyptus polyanthemos 067 3 Schinus molle 072 4 Eucalyptus s . 104 2 Schinus molle 106 2 Eucalyptus citriodora 114 3 Eucalyptus citriodora 123 3 Eucalyptus citriodora 132 2 Quercus s . 143 2 Eucalyptus s . 206 3 Eucalyptus citriodora 236 4 Eucalyptus citriodora 282 2 Eucalyptus sp,295 2 Eucalyptus sp.. 298 3 Eucalyptus camaldulensis 302 2 Eucalyptus polyanthemos 332 3 Eucalyptus citriodora 344 3 Eucalyptus s . 352 3 Eucalyptus citriodora The Tree Number corresponds to the number in the Coyote Canyon Landfill Gas Plant Tree Health Assessment(2016) P:\SWT1601\Tree Replacement Plan\rlso Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan.docx((07/27/16» 3 2,74 LEA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE REPLACEMENT AND EEVEGETATION PLAN JULY 2015 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS PLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA Trees to be Removed A total of 284 trees will be removed. The species to be removed consist of myoporum(Myoporum laetum), Peruvian pepper(Schinus molle), and multiple species of eucalyptus(Eucalyptus spp.). The tree diameters at breast height(DBH)range from less than 2 inches to 28 inches and are summarized in Table C. In addition to the trees, all significant duff and thatch accumulations shall be removed at the direction of the Removal Monitor. These accumulations can provide a significant fuel source for wildfires. The locations of all the trees to be removed are presented on Figure 2. Table C: Removed Trees DBH' M o orum Peruvian Pepper Eucalyptus <6" 39 1 22 6"<12" 56 4 32 12"< 18" 34 2 14 18"<24" 16 0 7 >24" 8 2 7 Multitmnk2 8 0 18 N/A3 9 0 6 Total 170 9 106 In instances where multiple DBHs were given for an individual with multiple trunks at breast height,the cumulative DBH of the trunks was used to determine what DBH category the individual was placed in. 2 The notation in the DBH column in the Assessment says"multitrunk" 3 Dead tree or stump. Assessment=Coyote Canyon Landfill Gas Plant Tree Health Assessment(2016) DBH=diameter at breast height Removal Monitor The Removal Monitor is the land owner's representative in the field and shall be responsible for monitoring the removal of the trees. The Removal Monitor shall be a qualified biologist and capable of identifying native habitats and wildlife. The duties of the Removal Monitor shall include identifying trees that are to be retained or removed, demarcating the limits of coastal sage scrub (CSS)within the project area, ensuring that removal activities do not result in avoidable impacts to CSS or the retained trees,ensuring that removal activities do not result in impacts to wildlife species, and ensuring compliance with the NCCP/HCP Construction-Related Minimization Measures (Appendix A). The Removal Monitor shall prepare a brief field memorandum for each inspection that will be provided to the Removal Contractor and the land owner. The field memorandums will include observations relating to the tree removal activities and recommended actions to be taken by the Removal Contractor to ensure that removal activities do not result in avoidable impacts to native habitat,retained trees, or wildlife. Removal Contractor The Removal Contractor shall be familiar with all aspects of the project,including the equipment and materials being utilized. The Removal Contractor shall be familiar with the species to be removed and P:\SWT1601\Tree Replacement Plan\rlso Tree Replacement and Revegetation Pim.docx x07/27/16» 4 2715 ■ '• •• �, Ir ap r • v �i ,, � as•a•. �■ ■ `• • age • •a IR • • 00• • ■ ■ a • a ' • • • b am ung+■ � r ^• - � �,� iq ■ f • ■ jo � ■ ■ •J ■ •• r r 111 In � ' LEA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE REPLACEMENT AND EEVEGETATION PLAN JULY 2015 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS PLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA retained(Tables B and C). The Maintenance Contractor shall also be familiar with all of the native habitats and species to be avoided. Methods of Removal This Plan does not specify a method of removal; however,it is assumed that most, if not all, of the removals will be accomplished with the use of chainsaws. The method of removal employed by the Removal Contractor must not result in excessive ground disturbance,damage to the retained trees, or damage to native habitats or wildlife species. Trees that cannot be removed without significantly impacting existing CSS habitat, as determined by the Removal Monitor,may be left in place. The Removal Contractor shall take all necessary fire prevention precautions. The Restoration Contractor shall provide sufficient fire suppression materials (e.g., shovels, extinguishers, hoses, and water truck). In addition,the Restoration Contractor shall regularly replace or sharpen dull chainsaw chains. Disposal of Plant Materials. All plant materials (i.e., cut trees, duff, and thatch) shall be removed from the project area within 48 hours after being cut and disposed of at an appropriate, legal, off-site disposal location. Herbicide Treatment. Herbicide will be applied to each stump immediately(i.e., less than 1 minute) following tree cutting. Herbicide need only be applied to live trees as determined by the Removal Monitor. In order to apply an unrestricted herbicide(e.g., Round-Up), the Removal Contractor must have a Pest Control Business License,which requires that at least one individual employed by the Removal Contractor be in possession of a Qualified Applicator's License (QAL). If a qualified applicator is not present during treatment, all applicators must have undergone documented herbicide application training. All licenses must be issued by the State of California,registered in the County of Orange, and of current status. Only United States Environmental Protection Agency-approved herbicides may be used.No persistent herbicides may be used. Tree stumps shall be treated with a 100 percent solution. A brightly colored dye shall be used in all applications. The dye material shall be a nontoxic,water- soluble, liquid material. During herbicide application,protection or avoidance of nontargeted species (i.e.,native vegetation and retained trees)is required. Schedule The project area is within the NCCP Reserve and contains CSS habitat. In accordance with the NCCP/HCP Construction-Related Minimization Measures, tree removal activities shall occur outside of the coastal California gnatcatcher(Polioptila californica californica)nesting season(February 15 through July 15). In addition, to the maximum extent practicable,no tree removal activities will occur during the general bird breeding season(February 15 through August 31). Take of any nesting bird is prohibited by the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act. If tree removal during the breeding season becomes necessary,the land owner must inform the regulatory agencies of the need to perform tree P:\SWT1601\Tree Replacement Plan\rlso Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan.docx((07/27/16» 6 1j j LEA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE REPLACEMENT AND EEVEGETATION PLAN JULY 2015 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS PLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA removal activities during the breeding season. In the past, and only for very small areas, the regulatory agencies have allowed vegetation clearing during the breeding season if a qualified biologist performed a detailed nesting survey of the area that is to be worked. If the biologist finds any species of nesting bird within the work area, work will be delayed until there are no birds nesting within the area. For larger areas,the agencies have required that protocol surveys for coastal California gnatcatchers (Polioptila californica californica)be conducted by a qualified biologist prior to the clearing of vegetation. If any nesting birds are found during the protocol surveys (even species other than coastal California gnatcatcher),tree removal activities will be delayed. REVEGETATION Revegetation Monitor The Revegetation Monitor is the land owner's representative in the field and shall be responsible for monitoring the installation, establishment, and maintenance of the replacement trees and native erosion control seed mix according to this Plan. The Revegetation Monitor shall be a qualified biologist or certified arborist(when applicable as determined by the certified arborist) capable assessing the health of the installed trees and the project area. The Revegetation Monitor shall be responsible for the following: Review and verify the genetic source of all plant materials to be installed. If feasible, assess the health and condition of all trees to be installed at the nursery prior to delivery. • Assess the health and condition of all trees to be installed upon delivery to the project area prior to installation and during installation. Review any erosion control measures and the performance of the irrigation system following installation. • Monitor the installation of the trees and erosion control seed mix. • Regularly assess the revegetation area during the establishment period (i.e., 120 days following installation)to ensure that the establishment of the trees and erosion control seed mix is being promoted and that undesirable species are being removed. • Assess the revegetation area on a semi-annual basis following the establishment period. • Propose remedial measures if the revegetation effort is unsuccessful. Assessments of the revegetation area will entail assessing the health of the installed trees, the performance of the irrigation system, any erosion control issues, the degree of invasion by undesirable species, and expansion/encroachment of CSS habitat within the project area. The establishment of CSS habitat beyond its current limits within the project area shall not be allowed. CSS shrub species seedlings shall be removed from those portions of the project area where CSS habitat does not currently exist. The Revegetation Monitor shall prepare a brief field memorandum for each inspection that will be provided to the Revegetation Contractor and the land owner. The field memorandums will include the Revegetation Monitor's observations as well as recommended actions to be taken by the Revegetation Contractor to ensure the establishment and continued well-being of the installed vegetation. P:\SWT1601\Tree Replacement Plan\rlso Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan.docx x07/27/16» 7 172 LEA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE REPLACEMENT AND EEVEGETATION PLAN JULY 2015 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS PLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA Revegetation Contractor The Revegetation Contractor responsible for the installation and maintenance of the trees and erosion control seed mix shall be familiar with all aspects of the project, including equipment and materials being utilized.All pruning of trees to be retained shall be consistent with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI)A300 pruning practices. The Revegetation Contractor shall be familiar with the undesirable species that occur in the vicinity of the project area, including,but not limited to, the list provided in Table D. The Maintenance Contractor shall also be familiar with all of the native species to be installed within the revegetation area(Tables E and F).Following installation,the project area shall be maintained regularly in accordance with this Plan. Table D: Undesirable Species Scientific Name Common Name Artemisia call ornicat coastal sagebrush Chrysanthemum coronarium garland chrysanthemum Cynara cardunculus artichoke thistle Erio onum dsciculatum California buckwheat Eucalyptus sp.' eucalyptus Myoporum Whim myoponun Salvia mellifera' black sage Salsola tragus Russian-thistle Schinus molle Peruvian pepper These native species shall not be removed from existing CSS habitat. 2 Except those specified trees that are to be retained. CSS=coastal sage scrub Table E: Replacement Tree List Scientific Name Common Name Size Quantitv Alnus rhombi olio white alder 36"or 48"box 12' Platanus racemosa western sycamore 36"or 48"box Quercus agrifolia coast live oak 24"box 63 A total of 12 white alders and western sycamores will be installed.Both species need not be installed.One species may substitute for the other. 2 Coast live oaks will be planted in groups of 3, 10 ft on center. ft=feet/foot Table F: Erosion Control Seed Mix Scientific Name Common Name Pounds/Acre Bromus carinatus California brome 16 Elymus triticoides beardless wild-rye 10 Lasthenia calf ornica coastal goldfields 1 Lupinus bicolor miniature lupine 10 Plantago erecta California plantain 8 Stipa Ie ida foothill needle grass 3 Stipa pulchra I purple needle grass 12 P:\SWT1601\Tree Replacement Plan\rlso Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan.docx((07/27/16» 8 LEA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE REPLACEMENT AND EEVEGETATION PLAN JULY 2015 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS PLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA Erosion Control Erosion control measures shall be supplied, installed, and maintained as necessary. In the case of heavy rainfall conditions, nonvegetative erosion control measures (e.g., sandbags, rice straw wattles, or silt fence)may need to be installed. The Revegetation Contractor shall be responsible for all erosion control for the entire term of the contract. Erosion control shall include,but is not limited to, (1)installation of an erosion control seed mix(see Installation Materials and Techniques section); (2) continuation of nonvegetative erosion control, as necessary; and(3)repair of rutting and washouts. Irrigation A permanent irrigation system to be designed by a landscape architect and built by the Revegetation Contractor will be installed to facilitate the establishment of the installed plant material and ensure the survival of the installed trees for the life of the project. The irrigation system shall also be designed so that the retained trees are also serviced. The tree species to be installed and the retained trees may require supplemental irrigation for the life of the project. This is especially true for the western sycamores (Platanus racemosa)and white alders(Alnus rhombifolia)that naturally occur primarily in riparian habitats. The Maintenance Contractor will be responsible for maintenance of the irrigation system for the life of the project. The failure of many of the existing viewshed trees may be attributable to the poor maintenance of the existing irrigation system. Schedule Installation of erosion control measures and the irrigation system may commence immediately following completion of removal activities. Installation of the tree species may occur following completion of the removal activities; however, it is preferable that the western sycamores and white alders are installed during their dormancy period (late fall through winter). The erosion control seed mix shall be installed in late fall or early winter. Monthly monitoring and maintenance shall occur throughout the 120-day establishment period immediately following the completion of installation. Monitoring and maintenance shall occur on a semi-annual basis for the life of the project following the 120-day establishment period. Installation Materials and Techniques Trees. The tree species to be installed within the project area were selected based on the native species found in the project vicinity,provisions within the City Standards, and capability of meeting the viewshed requirements. No trees will be installed within existing CSS habitat. If possible,the generic source of all trees to be installed in the project area will be within 20 miles of the project site. All species substitution decisions or alternative genetic sources shall be approved by the Revegetation Monitor. The planting locations for all of the trees are depicted on Figure 1. All trees shall be installed within 7 days following acceptable delivery. The list of species, sizes, and quantities to be installed are presented in Table E. P:\SWT1601\Tree Replacement Plan\rlso Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan.docx((07/27/16» 9 leo LEA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE REPLACEMENT AND EEVEGETATION PLAN JULY 2015 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS PLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA Tree Installation Techniques. This Plan does not specify the equipment to be utilized;however, it is anticipated that excavators,backhoes, front-end loaders, or skid steers may be employed. The method of installation employed by the Removal Contractor must not result in excessive ground disturbance, damage to the retained trees, or damage to native habitats or wildlife species. Tree planting locations shall be marked under the instruction and supervision of the Revegetation Monitor. Trees shall be planted in accordance with the following specifications: • All planting holes shall have vertical sides with roughened surfaces and be at least 1.5 times the diameter and depth of the plant's container. The Revegetation Contractor may elect to excavate larger planting holes in order to facilitate greater root development. • After excavation and before planting,the planting holes shall be thoroughly saturated with water,backfilled with thoroughly broken-up native topsoil, and then thoroughly saturated again with water to avoid soil settling after installation. Holes shall be allowed to drain thoroughly between fillings to reduce settling. Any roots wrapped around the sides of the containers shall be pulled loose from the root balls. The sides of the root balls shall be scarified to promote new root development. • Roots shall be adequately protected at all times from the sun and/or drying winds. • Trees shall be planted with the roots untangled and laid out in the planting holes to promote good root growth and prevent the trees from becoming rootbound. Trees shall be set in the thoroughly drained planting holes so that the crowns of the root balls are 0.5 inch above finish grade when backfilled with soil. The crowns of the trees shall not be depressed. A watering basin shall be created around each tree. The basin shall not be a depression in the soil. • Each tree shall be individually watered at the time of planting with sufficient water to reach the lower roots. Special care must be taken to prevent the soil from washing away from the roots and the root crown from being buried with soil. In addition, special care should be taken to avoid excess watering and the formation of erosion rills along slopes. All empty tree containers shall be removed from the project area and not left on site overnight. Seed. The erosion control seed species to be installed were selected based on the native species found in the vicinity of the project area and on provisions within the City Standards. If possible, the genetic source of all trees to be installed in the project area will be within 20 miles of the project site.All species substitution decisions or alternative genetic sources shall be approved by the Revegetation Monitor. The list of species to be seeded and the required pounds per acre (lbs/ac) of each species are presented in Table F. Prior to procurement of the seed, the Revegetation Monitor shall make any needed adjustments based on availability and cost considerations. The erosion control seed mix will be hand seeded or hydroseeded within those portions of the project area that currently do not contain CSS habitat. The method of installation employed by the Removal Contractor must not result in excessive ground disturbance, damage to the retained trees, or damage to native habitats or wildlife species. P:\SWT1601\Tree Replacement Plan\rlso Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan.docx x07/27/16» 10 282 LEA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE REPLACEMENT AND EEVEGETATION PLAN JULY 2015 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS PLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA Seeding Techniques: Hand Seeding/Broadcast Seeding.If hand seeded,the specified seed mix will be mixed with bran at a 2:1 ratio by volume and will be broadcast over the project area. After hand seeding/broadcasting,the seed is to be lightly raked into the soil (but not buried)with a flexible landscape rake or equivalent. Seeding Techniques: Hydroseeding.If hydroseeded, a two-stage hydroseed application method shall be employed.Preventive measures must be taken to avoid damage to the installed/retained trees or adjacent native vegetation(i.e., spraying and covering plants with mulch, or breaking stems or branches with hoses). The application procedure is as follows: • First Application 0 150 lbs/ac of 100 percent long-strand wood fiber(no tackifier) 0 Specified seed • Second Application 0 2,000 lbs/ac of 100 percent long-strand wood fiber(no tackifier) 0 150 lbs/ac Ecology Control"M"binder All hydroseed mixing shall be performed in a clean tank and shall take place at the project site.All hoses shall also be clean. The Revegetation Contractor shall spray designated areas with the slurry in a sweeping motion and in an arched stream until a uniform coat is achieved,with no slumping or shadowing, as the material is spread at the required rate. The tanks must be emptied completely during each stage of hydroseeding. Any slurry mixture that has not been applied by the Revegetation Contractor within 1 hour after mixing shall be rejected and replaced at the Revegetation Contractor's expense. Mulch and Fertilizer The Revegetation Contractor shall not use mulch or chemical fertilizer unless directed to do so by the Revegetation Monitor. No mulch or fertilizer is prescribed within this Plan; however,the Revegetation Monitor may prescribe the use of mulch or fertilizer at any point during the installation or monitoring process based on observed soil conditions or performance of the installed trees. MAINTENANCE The retained trees shall be maintained by the Revegetation Contractor according to the recommendations presented within the Assessment immediately following completion of removal activities. The entire project area, excepting those areas that currently contain CSS habitat, shall be maintained by the Revegetation Contractor according to this Plan and the City Standards for the life of the project. Normal maintenance will include removal of undesirable species,pruning of trees, trash removal, erosion control, and irrigation system maintenance. The establishment of CSS habitat beyond its current limits within the project area shall not be allowed. CSS shrub species seedlings shall be removed from those portions of the project area where CSS habitat does not currently exist. Maintenance activities shall not result in impacts to existing CSS habitat. Tree pruning activities shall P:\SWT1601\Tree Replacement Plan\rlso Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan.docx((07/27/16» 11 122 LEA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE REPLACEMENT AND EEVEGETATION PLAN JULY 2015 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS PLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA occur outside the general bird breeding season(February 15 through August 31). The project area shall be maintained for undesirable species on a monthly basis throughout the 120-day establishment period immediately following installation to ensure the establishment of the installed vegetation. The project area shall be maintained on a semi-annual basis thereafter for the life of the project. With the exception of those species that cannot be eradicated through manual removal(including use of hand tools), undesirable species present shall be removed manually.Herbicide usage shall be subject to approval by the Revegetation Monitor. Long-term Maintenance In addition to the maintenance requirements previously described, long-term maintenance activities shall be instituted in order to promote the growth of appropriate native trees and allow for the removal of the retained trees and potentially the removal of the native riparian tree species. The retained nonnative species (i.e., Peruvian pepper and eucalyptus) are not appropriate within the NCCP Reserve. In addition,the eucalyptus appear on the City Standards list of prohibited species and are a potential fire hazard. The short-term goal of this Plan is for the retained trees and the relatively fast- growing western sycamores/white alders to satisfy the viewshed requirements in a relatively short amount of time. Although native, the western sycamores and white alders are both deciduous and most often are associated with riparian habitats. A significant amount of supplemental irrigation will be required to sustain these individuals. Coast live oaks are the only evergreen tree species native to coastal Orange County that can withstand the relatively xeric hilltop conditions and fulfill the viewshed requirements;however,this species is relatively slow growing and will not be able to fulfill the viewshed requirements for many years.Nonnative tree individuals shall be removed if and when native individuals provide suitable viewshed in the same location. Likewise,native riparian tree species may be removed if and when the coast live oaks provide suitable viewshed in the same location. Coast live oaks will be planted in groups of three, 10 feet on center. This will guard against long-term loss and encourage vertical growth of the oaks. The coast live oaks will be thinned on the recommendation of the Revegetation Monitor at the appropriate time. P:\SWT1601\Tree Replacement Plan\rlso Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan.docx x07/27/16» 12 1g3 LEA ASSOCIATES, INC. TREE REPLACEMENT AND EEVEGETATION PLAN JULY 2015 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS PLANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA APPENDIX A NCCP CONSTRUCTION-RELATED MINIMIZATION MEASURES P:\SWT1601\Tree Replacement Plan\rlso Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan.docx a07/27/16x 12 NCCP Construction-Related Minimization Measures NCCP/HCP FEIS/FEIR No. 553, Section 7.5.3 1. To the maximum extent practicable,no grading of CSS habitat that is occupied by nesting gnatcatchers will occur during the breeding season(February 15 through July 15). It is expressly understood that this provision and the remaining provisions of these"construction-related minimization measures,"are subject to public health and safety considerations. These considerations include unexpected slope stabilization, erosion control measures and emergency facility repairs. In the event of such public health and safety circumstances,landowners or public agencies/utilities will provide USFWS/CDFG with the maximum practicable notice(or such notice as is specified in the NCCP/HCP)to allow for capture of gnatcatchers, cactus wrens and any other CSS Identified Species that are not otherwise flushed and will carry out the following measures only to the extent as practicable in the context of the public health and safety considerations. 2. Prior to the commencement of grading operations or other activities involving significant soil disturbance, all areas of CSS habitat to be avoided under the provisions of the NCCP/HCP, shall be identified with temporary fencing or other markers clearly visible to construction personnel. Additionally,prior to the commencement of grading operations or other activities involving disturbance of CSS, a survey will be conducted to locate gnatcatchers and cactus wrens within 100 feet of the outer extent of projected soil disturbance activities and the locations of any such species shall be clearly marked and identified on the construction/grading plans. 3. A monitoring biologist,acceptable to USFWS/CDFG will be on site during any clearing of CSS. The landowner or relevant public agency/utility will advise USFWS/CDFG at least seven(7)calendar days(and preferably fourteen(14)calendar days)prior to the clearing of any habitat occupied by Identified Species to allow USFWS/CDFG to work with the monitoring biologist in connection with bird flushing/capture activities. The monitoring biologist will flush Identified Species(avian or other mobile Identified Species) from occupied habitat areas immediately prior to brush-clearing and earth-moving activities. If birds cannot be flushed,they will be captured in mist nets,if feasible, and relocated to areas of the site to be protected or to the NCCP/HCP Reserve System. It will be the responsibility of the monitoring biologist to assure that Identified bird species will not be directly impacted by brush-clearing and earth-moving equipment in a manner that also allows for construction activities on a timely basis. 4. Following the completion of initial grading/earth movement activities,all areas of CSS habitat to be avoided by construction equipment and personnel will be marked with temporary fencing or other appropriate markers clearly visible to construction personnel. No construction access,parking or storage of equipment or materials will be permitted within such marked areas. 5. In areas bordering the NCCP reserve system or Special Linkage/Special Management areas containing significant CSS identified in the NCCP/HCP for protection, vehicle transportation routes between cut-and-fill locations will be restricted to a minimum number during construction consistent with project construction requirements.Waste dirt or rubble will not be deposited on adjacent CSS identified in the NCCP/HCP for protection. Preconstruction meetings involving the monitoring biologist,construction supervisors and equipment operators will be conducted and documented to ensure maximum practicable adherence to these measures. 6. CSS identified in the NCCP/HCP for protection and located within the likely dust drift radius of construction areas shall be periodically sprayed with water to reduce accumulated dust on the leaves as recommended by the monitoring biologist. 8/9/01(ConstMinMeaswes-NCCP.doc) 28.5 � GZSXCZ 1 1 ARTISTIC N) engineering Sprint �M GAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS M O N O E U C (TREES REMOVED) AEsims.co 877.9AE.sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 � b PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS\ ©2016 Google Maps Y " LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE (�/ Accu RACY or PHOTO SIMULATION BASED uRDry INFORMATION PROVIDED BY aROJE r(gpvLicnrvi. N) jEAT'STC engineerin1 GAS Sprint TM 8779AE.sims RECOVERY SYSTEMS MONOEUC - ■ ■ AESims.co 20662 NEWPORT COASTDRIVE NEWPORT BEACH L { d+ h @2016 Google Maps PROPOSED MONDEUCALYPTUS Ile 0 _fit �� ,.�i A �(C. ^� ,•.i • �� �w•���s•�r C4, _�. _ y�q s � ' s�e�' '�'�' yw ,/� y ICrCysr ��y/rlR r r ' �•' f �4 r.. � 'l ' '!1�.,.. �i•IK►����i-.�rR» i.. � RFy' .1 � � !�. ^o..; ':-�' " tti,:r - - -ys.i ♦ ro � R � 0♦s} •.. it - � .M'• ~ '¢�• Lll ^mom � f"M l•� �' �•i. . - � ��� _ EXISTING PROPOSED • • NORTHWEST FROM • PARK ROAD • VISTA RIDGE ROAD r \I OG25XC21 1 ARTISTIC Sr I nt �M GAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS M O N O E U C (TREES REMOVED) AEsims com p 8779AE Sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS\ PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS\ LOCATION ©2016 Google Maps jw�J LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE �/ ((��((''J� Accu RACY or PHOTO SIMULATION BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY PRo�Gr�gIUDANT. \1 OS25XC21 1 ARTISTIC Sr I �t �M GAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS M O N O E U C (TREES REMOVED) AEsimscom p 8779AE Sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 i' {,.y;,l•n ( PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS ©2016 Google Maps � G r• •t •nmol r:nt •f LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROM 73 TOLL ROAD ACCURACY OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED RY PRD.f [��PLICANT. Is a1 - ■ - ■ ■ - - ■ r I ■ Z . - -06 r •�� ti 's �, "�' I� e � a rsan�oaa onus_ �\ �' +#'�� Y.�•r�•�(, �' i / -lam � - `0` 1 s - ,• � � Y .�� �Y • I ve 11.4 LOCATION o � # •' - .:z'� �!� ,a. .� a. tea{ ♦'.t' y E • i , . j +1 \T �. ,� t � i r �. r• �-.. j}t;�� in.AY ay C� ri.'•"' y, �ry'.s ,,:k'_ � ' — �� � � '��� i � : • � � ` '��Sw i si Y is •6 ..�I,�i.N'r M,' ! �t �' ,da, - ' ; R~` a :. a'� 1' �` •� - / .� it S''^ r =� • ' ��i. >v+,4:a� xticr •C'� is � yr f• rr i. ! ; � '�:� :..� ' :,�_ ''�_` 13�5K��v�•�.��. ,Ki'^`.t ^ f"/�t�{y� , J., 1i� �'� '7^�M,.'*'A �. -c. _ .. -i k ,'n.,�.- ��� -f�i -).�,n iY 'i�• r rrJ it ' "7'�, r { v R `;. > .. ♦ '�� '� �,.A.�' �u"�ti +S.'L'v .�?�l!\�{ •] �� .i.. '•r r >.\ � `"S � 'niY '.♦ -r{. L:�+.• -.� t' n�M`�'k'l� ��/. } yti "�" 1 `S• „\i.' ♦ � •� r.e-. .A - a'/! .� 4 C y � b1 r ,5,,.'� � � r+ :'.��'•^,,'•.7�t`t. 1 . �� �1 ����Qle,�ad.y 2�.J1J� _tR``> �V� u.' 1• t r 1 t•!, �,+ + 1_ •~ N S ♦ r � aCr . ,.1 .L :\ `� � 1.R'� ♦:�� h•k ., y N9• Fc�'-ar}T:ta'a �.! !.. . y• 'r �'�R - :1 n o ''4 4+� •7" i .��'4''r � j k N1 �.,. ' '� a�i e l a�` -`V,,. _ ' ' .L'• i, ;..' �.w .a�f•'v}1 ' ,� -1•, �►i�'.y�p't!_� \j�,�`f��{�1.� �Y. 5 V I`,'•y' �`C �n,..i�� � ;�� �� .+{&r}lu^i ..t rbq< . ��ja- r .i`, �,• � +,..+�"1. v 'y,,�T.�i '��'� �CZ'l:,'.y`"�`Y s:` ' r��.�•.'� �-.t.�'`\:`'QIT .:,j Fal j±.`Y�E: '� {. '.,a '-q-..- �ai�c 4 1 r'.: t r. •'- ' • r 'N � '' �y r.�. r.` � .^V 1' �\: a'� � �4 'a:. ti - .. . ..� ..,(r:, b .. •. . . � a •. ��-_ ;•-. +Ift... : F.S{o-. _ y.. EXISTING - PROPOSED • • • - - • - • 1 _ � GZSXCZ 1 1 (,CAT'STCRI �l ngineerinSprint �MGAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS MONOEUC ( 5 YEAR GROWTH) AEsims.com 877.9AE.sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS \ H LANDSCAPING ©2016 Google Maps /PROPOSED _ so© LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE AccuwACY OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED aY PRo.LtD��LIPLI.ANT. N) jEAT'STC engineerin1 GAS Sprint Tm 8779AE.sims RECOVERY SYSTEMS M ■ ■ GROWTH) 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 1 @2016 Google Maps PROPOSED MONDELICALYPTUS PROPOSED LAND CAPING .. ILI g, ".:r A r*. .�i�el_v:$� � •i"Le�iq �1M: + ��-t � ` r� + rr r 'fGi►f4� � e�. � ... � .R i h it� �py��� _ �' � .. ,[[cc``GGYY ♦ ♦� ! s w .y w 4 r-�"R. � �L .��--y��r,.��t �� ^� !A ,� fir` ^♦ �e• • �� rr'r���� y�q � � ' s�?� �j yam' i!i / • :�r � mR'S.f ,; T'-'�•s,T�j Z r' r 1. � M y � � I �"� } �t° � a 4a )�.`S`• �t, �?.../e ut�af k M , ml \ '1 'ij Y` i .t' �;.. . Y �j S �' • i '� •m /J, r� l �r? �pn "i EXISTING PROPOSEDLOOKING NORTHWESTFROM • PARK ROAD • VISTA RIDGE ROAD � GZSXCZ 1 1 (,CAT'STCRI �l ngineerinSprint �MGAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS MONOEUC ( 5 YEAR GROWTH) AEsims.com 877.9AE.sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 y- : 1 PROPOSED MDNOEUCALYPTUS\ PROPOSED MONDEUCALYPTUS ©2016 Google Maps PROPOSED LANDSCAPING jw � r�r r i � � 3 LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE AccuRAC. OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED UFON INFORMATION PROVIDED By P ojqj;PL.ANT. ARTISTIC GAS S p r i nt RECOVERY SYSTEMS MONOEUCYEAR ■ 20662 NEWPORT COASTDRIVE NEWPORT BEACH 1 t r 4 1 . . PROPOSED LOCATION @2016 .I: t , I - EXISTING PROPOSEDLoOKINr. SOUTHWEST • • ROAD ' ' . _ ■ ■ _ _ ■ Z . - :.ySj, : 6 o.. 1 �wl � _ LOCATION o r f . l 't �'�� i r � r. a �5 i;�� i n � ry, Lt,. ... y..•L,(r�� �a�'„^� '��?Ei, '�i"1 `���+1i��..r. ��f .'�'3' , • p: J Jt !r*�y j $ ru�'Y �5�+ sN _: Y n Y r, y} PROPOSED LANDSCAPING 4 - IV IL ��d . f.4: r��� e ,Q'v - Y+ f• rr T : .�,k. 1 w )5�a. a'a` La .Ki^`.t t Frr i � , J, 'lip:;. Y ♦ �'{ v ,R `:..a > r. r+: ♦l.; �fi li(�59 �!�,I�`�\ I+�Sn ���t�i+v .T�+�ll`l '] '>tl' ,,�,., r• y� r . ;x•.. � .a ;�: � t :Z ''r ' '�} :tM�'t'tir,V�W�< .\ ,�/� 11}+ y^ii�.+:y�'t.��. �� �n4� ��l�i�• ,�•r„-• Ali .\iia'�ai'i ' 1 f\ `. . '.7d j ..t ����L .,`.�'1'!at•�-VCrN Y(I'� +Y�1� r- `:'� _ tA. y `4 a a .aC, ♦ •�.^4Rti y;:»�� 'r \.\,R � \ -'eFT�a`n •.! !' ' .ti' �I :(� - y4 � oY .'4 4+� ��- i �,. r4,[' ♦� . •��j Y.1 a�a, 1 ,�' '�\i e l� \'. yty" t-}.* - ' ' .L" .a� . � �. �.ti n �'y1'1��c ,� ,�y1•, �4��'.yyp't �\xF> �:f, \ Y. 5 y,�lyy' ��C �q,•:� \.'�� '^' ' .. -a.`&+7 1u^i .t t bq, .'t`a'i„a `r"" � y ��• - V • L,. `- V �T.�i'aiL J'a .� �CZ'1:.•.y` Y r v.��.'� �L�'a\ `'QIT .:�j F�1��.`Y�E: .\ i,i, -ti--._ v...r\c -ta e'.: �. r 1. • a 'yJ' ��t.. �' �zl y.R . .ti •��,n\ '�\: .`` � ,�4 i' ti s EXISTING \I OG25XC21 1 ARTISTIC Sr I nt �M GAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS M O N O E U C ( FULL MATURITY) AEsims com p 8779AE Sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 r � , I I Y' • PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS\ _ .[z.+'• �., - PROPOSED LANDSCAPING LANDSCAPING /PROPOSED©2016 Google Maps v _ Y V "Ron -<:-w�77 ,1 1. A L PROPOSED LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE AccuwACY OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED JFON INFORMATION PROVIDED aY ...JE9�PU.ANT. N) (CAT'STC engineerin1 GAS Sprint Tm 8779AE.sims RECOVERY SYSTEMS M ■ ■ MATURITY) 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA - 26571 @2016 Google Maps PROPOSED MONDEUCALYPTUS PROPOSED LANDSCAPING .. MI 1 �� y �C �'.+'.�• -r:� /ice" -.nA � .a i :.- � ^l O• .. :� '•� ._� a� _ , �`,',�� - .r.. A •.V' F i'6`l"+:$1 ` •M�"Lei� �iM � \4...t � � f• `,y�y ��. + r�,- [c Yl�� � .r .��.�� e.�n.,. N�• •*.a i w .1h it I ��� � \., _•_r'�IR�'/�` 1�-�..t �� � !Re � � . _4�r�ir - wig . r•,� y�q y� �YlS' � `�... •.���{�y�'h.1 r 7p �.w: �`0`- 4S' E„ �.R�I<8��• At'S^tr .�'�'..; ^mi�; � 1"..' t�.,,r - -as':i ro�� f ww7 tr - JY^ _ � ; ,• i *'�t t= o•+R9.f.r F« 4 y '�� �� .ftt �i`Sr 0� l k � y ���'��� IR 7y-r��1(fi. . S. ,.Yc '.: � I, ` ., „ry ♦ Z . � •�, � 10.1 'w � yet - .., '�{yf���v R�a 4,• ���` y� `�. / �•.G � ut�af� � M �I .e, \ , .. �� � � '1 , 'ij Y` i .t' �;.. . Y �j S ,f�' • i '� m rJ �� l fT'�" �pe� "i EXISTING I-OOKINr. NORTHWESTFROM • PARK ROAD • VISTA RIDGE ROAD � GZSXCZ 1 1 (,CAT'STCRI �l ngineering Sprint �MGAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS MONOEUC ( FULL MATURITY) AEsims.co877.9AE.sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 y- : 1 PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS\ PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS ROPDSED LANDSCAPING ©2016 Google Maps L'. r i � ski � 3 LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE AccuRAC. OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED JFON INFORMATION PROVIDED By PRo & .ANT. \1 OG25XC21 1 AgTeSTIC� S GAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS M O N O E U C ( FULL MATURITY) AEsims.co r I �t �M m p 877.9AE.sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 e 1 PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS PROPOSED LANDSCAPING PROPOSED LANDSCAPING • • ©2016 Google Maps t: IvLm e ? -VID :nt - • - • • LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROM 73 TOLL ROAD Accuwncv OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED JPON INFORMATION PROVIDED a. PR..J-� -U-ANT. ' ' • — ■ — ■ ■ • — I ,.dip` )L�SdO Jddd`d HIIS_F `� /, � \\\ 'a'r +YN.. '3� `�� ` ., ♦�"_f. yo v , t , `SII t ,pw`• 44 _ .jam - k eft • M 4 I I LOCATION { t y A �' - • t' r • •• .fes Y ) e Y • !tr �� k +t}•. a j... �. A+' � M _ .r ..� j:. Jv It?,�1� • FSA.� fir.: f� 1� .o�.r F �1.G�v v ��^�y- . . a. :� .1 ,- :,,y ` ., Y 9' ! a '' � <� •n'nff ...r{ � K•,T,. 1` T �.uw`{ .... - ;: ._ �:� ! r� 1 ;W .,• _ ,Ry t �.. _ .P •k "' ,6- PROPOSED LANDSCAPING Y Ilk- ' v ✓ • YY V .i'ti lY 1\ •' � 1. 'f /t. N 2' y i f 1 .�.�+ , M t�•. \�. ..�1•j �e^ Ffr ` , 1 j: k -).l,n �Y \: Y -i J.. It "7'� ♦ { v R `i..� } ♦- r�: al.:�f' 3' � -77 ,\3li..l+�5n -•Oy1'�1,.: ` 5 +' - y' ! ♦ ;.r.. '.♦ ;•: �,{ {'+' `V ,tM+''!.'ti..v�' .\ �/, � -.:y:"t,' Si „\4 .��� -•y ,.:,�. .,.( - ...\ \ \"S I 1 Y I. r.l c.. ♦' ��` rQ Al\a1 � .\1� ',` 4. ,.9` '�•FIs,�'me,g'.+'rFw(T'...�1 wp�nl' 1• � ri s .! •-t _ bf ' �"1 tA•. •�. 4 ..1 ♦ t , ' � .aC•l, '7d♦jv rp i,;lyA':.�1�.t��*(y\•-y/�.Q`wCl6e�✓t.l� ` AP. aR �1.\..`t.;\•J V' '.! !.. , y� �I �'�� - �:1 Y o .r`4`' 4+�., r c '�" :4•'t'• `� . i�j �1 ��•♦, 1 ,�' '�t v• �Cyt \''. 2„-.Vfa ,,_ V. ` SN' \.t , o\• �.�.�J1.•�^j�R�f''yv�}. fl,y,��•� !►�M'.yyp'-�_1�\ * •�1.� `�;. Y• 5 • %K ,4j \n\\ l ,:y`+,dt''.•'.g-.- .aq° `aSye� a �,.: ki, r, �• •�. - � � ` ♦ 'YJ' �+14 '• �!�zlY,R �'i.�..4t. `^v ti '��: .gin � ,- 4 a' t EXISTING � GZSXCZ 1 1 (,CAT'STCRI �l ngineering Sprint �MGAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS TEMP (TREES REMOVED) AEsims.co877.9AE.sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 PROPOSED TEMP MONOPOLES ©2016 Google Maps �� _ Y " LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE AccuRACY OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED By PRO LPPPLI CANT. N) jEAT'STC engineerinGAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS TEMP (TREES REMOVED) 1 I Sprint Tm 8779AE.sims -"op 20662 NEWPORT COASTDRIVE NEWPORT BEACH 1, s @2016 Google Maps PROPOSED TEMP MONOPOLES Milill vv��yy 'fGi►f4� �, � e '� � .R h it� � � ^�-�_ � �. .��--y��r,.��t �� ^� !A� ,� fir` ^♦ mei • ���� iw•'r���� L,i��. y�q � ' �s�e�' �r � y�' ' �•'� f � �4 r..� 'l ' - '��i'�� �iYK►i�.�i-.�rR» �.. 'A AFY. •` v� `�� ^o..; ':-�' " tti,:r - - -ys.i ♦ ro � R � r.sy •." it - � .M'• ~ '¢�• Lll "� i • y� k � yip y �R � �' p.' - � -:rra . .z r > � t�` Si"�• _ w � tires _ yp �• s R'� 4:f j,'as.ylr S`'. �c�.� � 1 w' ♦ +b". • k +►` � e' i M � - ` ^ �'�.n Y"lc'dAir,r � .. �/r��:z-�Yi _. ♦". t •F ., {� ♦ � �, f EXISTING PROPOSEDLOOKING NORTHWESTFROM • PARK ROAD • VISTA RIDGE ROAD ACCURACY OF PHOTO SIMUL-ATION BASED UPON INFORMATION __ - \I OG25XC21 1 ARTISTIC S � I n�, �M GAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS TEMP (TREES REMOVED) AEsimscom p 8779AE Sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 PROPOSED TEMP MONOPOLES\ LOCATION ©2016 Google Maps \\�\\\\, II pl Jew •Y �J LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE //���J AccuRACY of PHOTO SIMULATION BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED ev PRO��J/�PucANT. \1 OS25XC21 1 ARTISTIC S � I �t �M GAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS TEMP (TREES REMOVED) AEsimscom p 8779AE Sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 �'• .yam ;1 ,. i' PROPOSED TEMP MONOPOLES FL ©2016 Google Maps r• .r G f •nmol r:nt LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROM 73 TOLL ROAD /1� ACCURACY OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY PRQ04FLICANT. ' ' I 1�!` ' ,.dip AIRIF l LOCATION 1 , y .� \ �. • , �' - • t' r . 1• .fes Y _ ' Y J�'91• . l�.rr•�p� t y � 1. � wry `I � 1�- .7N'JS. �I�+U' Y'r r ��. rr.�.'rt.' ��� -)./ n \�. -rr t ' \;;7:�,.' � !{ 1.k. R :..1 > 1� `�. v 1 y�SK♦�tt;�.��. Ki'^`.t ^ F>r���l�� ,v !`t .] - ',�!` r•'� � - r 1 y' ! ' ♦ �N.. � .♦' )y ,.� r � t' ! {• L1� \ � rte} "r.+�'!'ti,v�W l .\�" ,ir. A+ y^'ti�..��1.� � �- �,\i.'�f�,�1�11��../.Y„-• .,. w.+ \ " -r ♦�,i 1 � bf r '., , .S'•.'r � N �� rS `'.tf� �ni..:,.7d 1.\t.11 r i•'1 >'si���' �:e,ti` �r y'�j` t (.� � )±.' t,r. -•� 'a .o. s�' a- •'�'.aCr .�?. ,.l l' �i \y.:� � ...'��\ '�,✓�' k� `y': k � � � �. `� to 4 "1 ♦ '. � � � ,l��\ w \.\ R r � ..9` Fc�'-ar}T:ia'a �.! !.. . y` ., :•\ ":1 ♦ y ''4{ •7" i '�`'Y•'=' ♦ . .,� t 1,\ �.♦ r ,� Vii` • \'•. 2.-.V,r ♦ _ �. _ � .\" \t, . \♦' �.1. .R 'yv�r� Il y.�1•♦ �4,�t'. - \'� ' "� .♦\. �`• 5 Y�1�•4` �`C fn...it \♦\\ l 71 it ftV. N ♦.t;g+�t t+^!,g•r.,.bq° ei\c :. 1 e'.: t't' 1' •1.. _ _ ♦ t '. - r.�. ♦'t. . .'� J'r`^ y ...,'� t ♦ ♦ i Y t EXISTING PROPOSED • • • - - • - � GZSXCZ 1 1 ARTISTIC N) engineering Sprint �M GAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS M O N O E U C (TREES REMOVED) AEsims.co 877.9AE.sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 � b PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS\ ©2016 Google Maps Y " LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE Accu RACY OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY PR ,_©Cj:PPLICANT. N) jEAT'STC engineerin1 GAS Sprint TM 8779AE.sims RECOVERY SYSTEMS MONOEUC - ■ ■ AESims.co 20662 NEWPORT COASTDRIVE NEWPORT BEACH L { d+ @2016 Google Maps PROPOSED MONDEUCALYPTUS L?.'4i •y�r� `!•'T t _ c•� ice..- -G aRt _ diE••.t_ �IIW 3 � `:aG a ^ . .• � r� S" �fc .� ' p. r .r�. A r� P 6•y •�1 � •♦'"j+s IC �1M .. .. � .t. `'R�iQ ;d w' r t_ - �...I••,/}•�� .K^w1 r ':.`r'f�vt' .]F.w: Le'R'� �S` <�Er ���,# P.y�' �., .. .� .r. '�'- t � +.�+.rte ti� '� ♦ TM f �i F R•" � _ � 'b„�t� r..' '-z' ..:-,:r - :as�i ♦ Aro�� R , r!�7ft!~, it rM � a♦A ti m����CI � / j • :�r � � r+q'9.f '; T'-'�•s,T�j Z r' r 1. � M - y � � I �"� q,,}��tr ��a 4 a �' j�7t'.`Se. �t � i!`/e � �„k ui$♦� k M �� m� � i ¢ �i � ; fA 'i'I Y` i .t' s; . . v ��j S �'$�T • �'� •m �, r� P' �� 1p,. 'f EXISTING PROPOSEDLoOKINr. NORTHWESTFROM • PARK ROAD • VISTA RIDGE ROAD \I OG25XC21 1 ARTISTIC Sr I nt �M GAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS M O N O E U C (TREES REMOVED) AEsims com p 8779AE Sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS\ PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS\ LOCATION ©2016 Google Maps 1 jw � r r �J LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE /�(� ACCURACY OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY PRO�/l&LI CANT. \1 OS25XC21 1 ARTISTIC Sr I �t �M GAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS M O N O E U C (TREES REMOVED) AEsimscom p 8779AE Sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 i' {,.y;,l•n ( PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS ©2016 Google Maps � G r• •t •nmol r:nt •f LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROM 73 TOLL ROAD /� ACCURACY OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED RY P .2.Q_gPLICANT. Im a1 I I JWMA ■ Z . - -06 zi ve 11.4 r I� e � a rsan�oaa onus_ �\ �' +#'�� Y.�•r�•�(, • I LOCATION o # •' - .:z'� �!• ,a. .� a. p��A $ /!'' B 'r ".Ji Irl••; _i.. �'41& �tl • a µ - f • �;�� � F r •{. �' � ler 14 t•i, nr.f . t � i r �. r• �-.. Y}t;�} in.AY ay,. C• ri '.v�5r � �ry'.s ,,:k'_ � ' — �� � � '��� i � : • � � ` '��Sw i si Y is •6 ..SI,�i.N'r M,' ! �t �' ,da, R~` a :. a'� .1._ � ' •� - / .� it S''^ r - =� • ' ..Aw�i. >v+,4:a� xticr •C'� is yr f• rr i. ! ; '�:�' :..� ' :, _ Y�_S 135K��v�,�.� ,Ki'^`.t ^ f"/ t {y , J., ft '7^�M,.'*'A �. -c. _ .. -i k ,•n.,�.- �� 'f�i -).�,n iY 'i�• r rrJ it ' "7'�, r { v R `;. > .. ♦ '�� '� �,.A.�' �u"�ti +S.'L'v .�?�l!\�{ •] �� .i.. '•r r >.\ � `"S � 'niY '.♦ -r{. L:�+., �.� t' n�M`�'k'l� ��/. } yti "�" 1 `S• „\i.' ♦ � •� r.e-. .A - a'/! .� 4 C y � b1 r ,5,,.'� � � r+ :'.��'•^,,'•.7�t`t. 1 . 1•'� �1 ����Qle,�ad.y 2�.J1J� _tR``> �V� u.' 1• t r 1 t•!, �,+ + 1_ •~ N S �♦ r ��•Cr .� ,.1� .L :\ `� ��1.R'� ♦:�� h•k�., y N9• Fc�'-ar}T:ta'a �.! !.. . y• 'r �'�R - :1 n o ''4 4+� •7" i Al.�� '=' ♦ . .,� k r1 �.,. ' '� a�i e l a'` -`V,,. _ ' ' .L'• i, ;..' �.w .a�f•'v}1 ' ,� -1•, �►i�'. t!_� \j�,�`f��{�1.� �Y. 5 V I`,'•y' �`C �n,..i�� � ;�� �� +{&r}lu^i ..t rbq< . ����jjaa-- r .i`, �,• +,..+� v T. i '��' �CZ'l:,'.y`"�`Ys.` ' r��.�•.' -.t.�'`\:`'QIT .:,j Fal j±.`Y�E: '� {. „d' '-q-..- �ai�c +`X4 1 r'.: t r. •'. ' • r 'yJ' � '' �y y.R r.` � .^V 1' �\: a'� � �4 'a:. ti - .. . ..� ..,(r:, b .. ,. . . � a •. ��-_ ;•-. +Ift... : F.S{o-. _ y.. EXISTING - PROPOSED • • • - - • • 1 _ � GZSXCZ 1 1 (,CAT'STCRI �l ngineerinSprint �MGAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS MONOEUC ( 5 YEAR GROWTH) AEsims.com 877.9AE.sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS \ H LANDSCAPING ©2016 Google Maps /PROPOSED _ Y " LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE Accu RACY OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED JFON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY PRO411�jPPLICANT. N) jEAT'STC engineerin1 GAS Sprint Tm 8779AE.sims RECOVERY SYSTEMS M ■ ■ GROWTH) 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 1 @2016 Google Maps PROPOSED MONOELICALYPTUS PROPOSED _ *' ���' �~1 � `..� �•' '- _ - C w ii-•�T?:+.- - �.F�_.'r '.yam �1�� ^::R-'rt',•„rpGl..nw s�"1'ah.,a.A e'er '�. _ � "l w �•� _ , ����s r r. A ly" �F i'�l"��� � •M�"L�i j� Ali;:, '. �lH.t- � ,n G `' :d�'h. r <r.- [c Yl�� � .��:�� enh te.._• •�.y i w •'h it I" ��� � \., � y ! .i_iyY�•.�t �! ,f�j�yysA �-,k/�M'�r �(C ^� ',.�..11M��~� 'w�,1� )� r� *. _ f���y��9q��,�� � ' s�?C �r ,�1� �' yyA,',: � •"1lPF �... ..' f.'�l�{�yKh.`�. ,�i�• 0`- :S' E� �11►4yI<� m"' ' P't- tr �� •�.' f t i 's '>F�' . s K►m r ��la '•o-.t:rp.- t. � a� a �; � '�; S .G,�,fie S:� •v � r'}'�' � 1 ^rte � f•.T. l•w � �' ��� _ � ��'M, ri f�., �j,` EXISTING PROPOSEDLOOKING NORTHWESTFROM • PARK ROAD • VISTA RIDGE ROAD � GZSXCZ 1 1 (,CAT'STCRI �l ngineerinSprint �MGAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS MONOEUC ( 5 YEAR GROWTH) AEsims.com 877.9AE.sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 y- : 1 PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS\ —RO POSED LAN DSCAPINCVPROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS ©2016 Google Maps ow 'Alto Y� i15 _ .. - 3 LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE �J Accu RACY OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED By P RO�,J�ILI.ANT. � GZSXCZ 1 1 (,CAT'STCRI �l ngineerinSprint �MGAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS MONOEUC ( 5 YEAR GROWTH) AEsims.com 877.9AE.sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 1' r Y � _ 1 PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS ©2016 Google Maps PROPOSED LANDSCAPING / I/ •nmut r:nt LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROM 73 TOLL ROAD --// AccuRACY OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED ev PR {Li41LicArvT. ' ' III a . _ ■ ■ _ _ ■ Z . - :.ySj, I _ .jam - k �ft�• M 4 4 ...4 >l• I 4.. 1 �wl ��' _ LOCATION o r ) t y 61 f . l 't '�� i r r. a 5 i; � i n Lt,. y..•�,(r � �}'„^ '•�?S,, �.L``.1 ry, • p: J Jt !r*�y j $ • ru�'Y PROPOSED LANDSCAPING 4 - fj It ��d f.4: r��� e ,Q'v - Y+ f• rr T : j .),k. 1 w 15�a. a'a` La .Ki^`.t t Frr i � , J, �Ij 1'- 7�.+q.,¢�. _y 'j ' k ,'r..�.- �� '7�+ -).l,v iY \� r rrJ tt ' '�:;. Y ♦ �'{ v ,R ):..a > r. r+: ♦l.; �fi li()59 �!�,I�`�\ I+�Sn ���t�i+v .T�+�ll`l '] '>tl' ,,�,., r• y� r . ;x•.. � ".a ;�: � t :Z ''r " '�} :tM�'t'tir,V�W�< .\ ,�/� 11}+ y^ii�.+:y�'t.��. �� �n4� ��l�i�• ,�•r„-• V, S 1 (, bf t ' q. • M. S `'. ft `. . '.7d j�v ..l '�"� ., �la•�NCa�YII'� +Y�1� ! f ayt:. . r- `:'t _ tA. y ..j a a .aC, ♦ •�.^4Rti� y;:»�� 'r \.\,R ��\ � -'eFT�a`n •.! !' ' .ti' �I :(� - y4 � oY .'4 4+� ��- i �,. r4,[' ♦� . •��j Y.1 a�a, 1 ,�' '�t i e l� \'. yty" t-}.* - ' ' .L" .a� . � �. �.ti n �'y1'1��c ,� ,�y1•, �4��'.yyp't �\xF> �:f, \ Y. 5 y,�lyy' ��C �q,•:� \.'�� '^' ' .. -a.`&+7 1u^i .t t bq, .'t`a'i„a `r"" � y ��• - V • L,. `- V y,,�T.�i'aiL J'a .� �CZ'1:.•.y` Y r v.��.'� �L�'a\ `'QIT .:�j F�1��.`Y�E: .\ ♦, i,i, '-ti--..- �ai\c +'�. 1 e'.: t r. •1. • a �/ � 7 �y r.�. L .ti .^�1 �\: Y'` � �4 'a:. ti EXISTING - PROPOSED \I OG25XC21 1 ARTISTIC Sr I nt �M GAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS M O N O E U C ( FULL MATURITY) AEsims com p 8779AE Sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 r � , I I Y' • PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS\ _ .[z.+'• �., - PROPOSED LANDSCAPING PROPOSED LANDSCAPING l F / ©2016 Google Maps v - .I[/// _ Y V "Ron -<:-w�77 ,1 1. or ZAPN "Ilk L PROPOSED LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE Accu RACY OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY IS.. I�PLICANT. I R LOCATION o PROPOSED MONCIEUCALY_ TUSPROPOSED LANDSCAPING or i ; vi, I a .,;'+ a'S SM .a, . / �i ;" • > + T moi.• I.I ��'. c 'ice fyti1, ' .r. l �S , 1 t•..,p O t4 -� • �\ frsaiasM![(r' y wf yQ b - ! , el v `L\r S Z r 1 fir, . � ,.'�+� .i L1ZS �- „\ ,.i • Or ^W-A' Ik 1 ,t � !A �, �� �C ^ ti tI•L "•ern _ q yTT.� ( rT�nTW1. , Jlt •. L' _two " w .,fMi - � y • ��+ �\�. +'d� _ •• �a. r(` w wf+ r }^ rr o• _ '� A °' EXISTING -- - PROPOSED • • • - - • • - - • • • - • - • � GZSXCZ 1 1 (,CAT'STCRI �l ngineering Sprint �MGAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS MONOEUC ( FULL MATURITY) AEsims.co877.9AE.sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 y- : 1 PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS\ -RO POSED LAN DSCAPINVPROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS ©2016 Google Maps � r�r r i � � 3 LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE -/ ((''J� Accu RACY OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY PRO ^ &LICANT. \1 OG25XC21 1 AgTeSTIC� S GAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS M O N O E U C ( FULL MATURITY) AEsims.co r I �t �M m p 877.9AE.sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 e 1 PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS PROPOSED LANDSCAPING PROPOSED LANDSCAPING ©2016 Google Maps - t: n i •nmol r:nt - . - . • LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROM 73 TOLL ROAD Accuwncv OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED JPON INFORMATION PROVIDED a. PR.�21_9PLI-ANT. ' ' • — ■ — ■ ■ • — I 1 _� t -•• 1�!" ,.dip ...�+ 'T,,'.;p•; � d.. ♦ � -, �. � � \A Y .. ��� y • }, �. 3�. 'fir Kp � �� 1! 44 )L�SdO Jddd`d HIIS_F `'\ /, � \\\ •a'r +YtS.. '3� `�. ' ., ♦•"•f. - rvG0 � ' Y � •- 6 _ .jam - k eft'•• M 4 I I LOCATION o t g t t y A # N • - • t � r • •• .fes Y � e Y • k 4'�r� 1 ;M .. �..• �' •- •' .� t �.. � � .Y "' 6- PROPOSED LANDSCAPING V II • . v��j� dtr 11 1 t7wt+�,-*'�• -'� .. • -j Yrkf rf M..,(,- ,t;" i• -),I,v JY \! li-J.. yt ' '^7:�. ' � l.{ 1.?+Y .b :..� > ♦� ,`�: ♦l,�f:{S�{ 's\a. `�! ��w7. eKi'^y i FVrt!}>,'Y ' •1'�+t11`l j CIPAV. A° _ r ...\ 4 a"S :- r F r.l '.e S•{,• 'c.. ♦ ` r•' •A' �'♦ � .\t 1' ��,�(�a �:1 :\'?yQt6aS �.i,: Jam. �! )Z.' 1• �•ri .t (, bf i q. 1 • M. S (st .• '.7d j ^ •.t l'��"."y���y '!1• Y�Cc Y(f� �� t yt.• s. y r(..1 � :t !" `�•t - la•. "y 'y ♦ ` .aCi ♦ .^t^•tiK . � -"'FT�a`n •! i• ' y' �' :'\ '1 Y o> .r'4 4+j •7- c �" r4,=' `�p Y' . j�j t•1 ♦,.♦, 1 ,� ,�t i e l�a \'. yty" t-.V.•' _ ' ' \" ,♦� , o�. �.1. .eT�f•'v '1c •l, •�y1•� 14,�'.yyp'_�_,� Ss .� V. -•.`&r t lu^i .t t bq< ,t, `r"" ( y. a,. � • L� �,- V �T.�i'�iL,.,'• .� �CZ'1:.•.y` Y � •.�•.'� �L�'•\ `•�t? .:•j F♦1,�.•YaE: .\ ,: i,i, '-ti--._ �ai�c +.�. 1 e'.: �. r. •' ♦ 'yJ• � 7 �y Y.�. L .ti .^�' \ ' �\,' r`a � � 4 ,�:. ti t � .. .. ., ....,t.'' .. -.. •. . ..' a ,,• .. 'rr,. ' . .. pi{¢-. _ y.. EXISTING - PROPOSED • • • - - • - • 1 _ \I OG25XC21 1 ARTISTIC S � I n�, �M GAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS TEMP (TREES REMOVED) AEsimscom p 8779AE Sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 r � , I I Y' nn PROPOSED TEMP MONOPOLES ©2016 Google Maps ANIL IIPFP v Ilk PROPOSED i. - � 1 LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE AccuRACY OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED av ISO._)PL L cervi. N) jEAT'STC engineerinGAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS TEMP (TREES REMOVED) 1 I Sprint Tm 8779AE.sims -"op 20662 NEWPORT COASTDRIVE NEWPORT BEACH 1, s @2016 Google Maps Y PROPOSED L^� y A �'ki 'a.�SF "w'T - 1 p �• . . .. � a� - ...- rvV�.yy ♦ti nq � � ,[[cc�`GGYY ♦ n�' !XT s w .y w 4 r-ea'1,C. �. �i ^o;.�t i+"".�.' �i' ...-'.,:r ' �ys.i ��♦yj . frow� f �`OTTT�'»MMMT«' . L' rM �A• ,f 1 ���, / • ��l , o•rh.9.f.r a�i�,w7.T} .'�. { _�-r 1..I - � � � �,F .ti y ������ � ��ii'f'f �::'�L � "Y:f?' ..0 ♦.>A.= _, . .y :"�I Z rid �% . � .. � � � � _ p�F..'1f1'<�s .� iC ....,G7 4Ze,K .r,� .�r�il 's. �'�$,>�.{-�1 �y�'f1 �f�• � - � s. ,�r. _ EXISTING PROPOSED "OOKING NORTHWESTFROM • PARK ROAD • VISTA RIDGE ROAD \I OG25XC21 1 ARTISTIC S � I n�, �M GAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS TEMP (TREES REMOVED) AEsimscom p 8779AE Sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 PROPOSED TEMP MONOPOLES\ LOCATION ©2016 Google Maps \\�\\\\, i. �J LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE AccuRACY of PHOTO SIMULATION BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED ev PR 2�?�J�PLI.ANT. \1 OS25XC21 1 ARTISTIC S � I �t �M GAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS TEMP (TREES REMOVED) AEsimscom p 8779AE Sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 �'• .yam ;1 ,. i' PROPOSED TEMP MONOPOLES FL ©2016 Google Maps r � G •nmol r:nt LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROM 73 TOLL ROAD ACCURACY OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED RT P, 4..LICANT. ' ' I ' _� ` -,• !` ' ,.dip` •..�+ 'T' � d.. I aLrsan�oaa onus_f \ f \\\ `.� +s�-" -� ` r /'yf�f�,' .�. ♦•:� : ti r 4 ' �.s y (: i r � .}'yJ -.: � - "` r I - '� • y .�� \ may: .,,: + ,y. � � �� 3 'fir : ♦ � Y'. l AIRIF LOCATION K A r _ '�• - •• S r . �• .fes � Y ' Y •• p. Jt,p1A� . kF.T.yHA ,. cu �) / hr`f ��. � Y1 :W .. � s4..• � • - � •, (, �'rfj �� � �.' Y )4.E _.`h\Yw`t' .. •w ... i-� v �� � � '��� � � :.� � �, ��w i. ♦ yL 'a. ` y�.r{+r M,' i• �' _ -do-, . . Y tti �`tYIt I, (• ,� ` \r, 1 ?. `•} rr U.' i ;: yr r 1 ••r.,; ��: n oY \:. J.... , ^7i , { v b :..� > . ",i ♦t,' vt 5 ss y �, � ' .i4 *'A 7•'xr � F.- ->.1, N _,2' ' , I,.. e , d �.� a , '4Y ♦, -;" ''17 Ki^`V . +51`� I. �•i. - y' ! ♦ TM•r .♦ ) r � 11 ` .�• �'.t{!k.,J -�r♦ '^'{i��.y�'l.i 4V�� •,\i.'� ��1�'--^�� � Ae � _ r .._\ 4 \•S \- Y bf �� e S,{!, c.. a' .'` ♦1 •P. ^..\ .� \t.11 , 'ii•y(�1 �:1 +\la�Q,l `TtiS �.J,: 1J�. ' -'• ri i ( -.' i ',q. t •�. N S ♦! tf\�.• '.7d j� •.l l''y,�i, .,`:^1'��'•�N�YF'� i� p� Y', a yr( ,�Is,Y'. i to y .r .. N�^'C �::,� to `. �'•� e r " �.! !.. � . y• �r .�� �:t � o .r•4 4+� •7- i .�" :4,[' �t. �p�� . j�j �1 ♦'•♦, ! ,� ��\,• ��a \'•. yty" t-.V.•'' - ' ' \'• „� , o�.' �.1. .eT�f•'v '1c •l, •�y1•� 14,�'.yyp'_�_!,� Ss .� \ Y. 5 y�ryy' �'C �n,..i:� �.,i� l -•{&r}1u^i .t .d'g° e `r"" . y. ��. • .,.. �,- V T. i'�iL,.,••' �CZ'1:.•.y` Y ..��.' ��'•\ `• 4jF♦1•�.`Y�E: .\ N, i,i, '-ti--._ �ai�c +.�. 1 e'.: �. r. •' i 'yJ' � 7 �y Y.�. � .ti .^�' \ ' �\� •`� � � 4 ,�:. ti L C ^ LSA EXECUTIVE ES INC FRESNO RIVERSIDE J \ 20 EXECLTIIA PARK. SUITE 200 949.553.Ofi 66 TEL BERKELEY PALM SPRINGS ROCKLN ERS;D IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614 949.553.8076 FAX CARLSBAD PT_ RICHMOND SAN LUIS OBISPO MEMORANDUM DATE: May 20,2016 TO: Romi Archer,LSA Environmental Services FROM: Ron Brugger, Senior Air Quality Specialist, LSA SUB3ECT. CEQA Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Technical Study for the Demolition of Structures And Construction of Temporary and Permanent Wireless Telecommunication Facilities at the Closed Coyote Canyon Landfill Gas-To-Energy Facility Site Project LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA)is pleased to submit this air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) analysis for the demolition of structures and construction of temporary and permanent wireless telecommunication facilities at the closed Coyote Canyon Landfill gas-to-energy facility site. The project site is located at 20662 Newport Coast Drive, and the active area of the project is located on a 4.14-acre(ac) area on a hill along the east side of Newport Coast Drive in the City of Newport Beach (City), California(refer to Figure 1, attached,for project location map). PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The proposed project consists of three components, all of which will occur at the landfill gas-to- energy facility site(project site). These components are the demolition of landfill gas-to-energy facility structures, the construction and operation of temporary wireless communication facilities, and the construction and operation of permanent wireless communication facilities. The first component that will occur will be the on-site demolition of most of the existing structures. Some of the existing structures will remain, including three existing landfill gas flares that will continue to flare landfill gas, structures needed to support the landfill gas collection system infrastructure, and existing electrical,water, sewer, and natural gas and landfill gas lines. In addition, the paved access road to the project site as well as the perimeter wall and the tall trees surrounding the perimeter wall will all remain. The most significant structure that will be demolished is an existing 105-foot(ft)high exhaust stack that is no longer in operation. This structure is highly visible in the Newport Coast and also houses cellular network apparatus that will need to be replaced with temporary apparatus and later(once demolition activities are complete)with permanent replacement apparatus. Demolition Demolition activities are anticipated to begin in October 2016 and shall be completed by December 31,2016. Demolition activities are anticipated to occur Monday through Saturday, from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. or sundown. 5/23/16 OAGEOI OOZE\AQ AnalysisCaQ-GHG Memo.docx» PLANNING I ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES I DESIGN 220 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Heavy equipment that will be utilized during the demolition effort include the following: a 270-ton crane for the removal of the turbine and generator; a 170-ton crane with 150 ft of boom for the removal of the 105 ft tall exhaust stack; a Komatsu 650 excavator with an Allied G 130 concrete hammer; a 350 Link belt excavator with a G90 concrete hammer and a Labounty MDP 27 universal processor; a 966 Cat rubber-tired loader; skidsteer loaders;water trucks; an 18-wheel semi-end dump trucks; and a vibratory sheep's foot compactor. Two large excavators with universal processors (i.e., a grabbing attachment on the excavators used for precise demolition work)will be used for tearing apart the existing structures. Jackhammering will be required to tear apart the concrete pad at the site,and concrete breakers will then be used for crushing the demolished concrete. The demolished concrete will then be removed off site and taken to a recycling facility. The voids left by the removal of the concrete pad will be backfilled with clean, compacted soil to 90 percent of maximum density and quality assured. There are certain structures at the gas-to-energy facility that will be sold by the demolition contractor to other gas-to-energy facility operators or for other similar facilities. These structures include the gas turbines,boilers, and other structures. These structures will be removed from the site and transported to their end-use destinations. Other structures will be dismantled using the two large excavators,with the dismantled materials sorted by material type. Materials will then transported off site for recycling(i.e.,metals and concrete). For the demolition of the 105 ft tall exhaust stack, a 170-ton crane with 150 ft of boom will be used to lift off sections of the stack that will be lowered to the ground,where the universal processors can size the material for trucking and proper off-site disposal. The stack will have some preliminary cuts performed by men on man-lifts,with the crane moved in and attached prior to finalizing the cuts, and the section lifted off and lowered to the ground. The process will continue until the stack is accessible from ground level. It is anticipated that it will take no more than 2 days to remove this exhaust stack, and the crane will not remain in the air for more than a few hours at a time. It is estimated that the demolition will generate approximately 8,640 tons of demolished concrete and that each truck will be able to haul 18 tons per load. Therefore,the demolition will generate approximately 480 two-way vehicle trips that will be distributed over a 3-month period. Assuming 25 workdays per month and a 3-month demolition schedule,the demolition component would generate approximately 7 two-way demolished concrete truck trips per day.For the estimated 14,360 square feet(sf)of structures that will be demolished, it is estimated this will generate approximately 4 two- way truck trips per day over the 3-month demolition schedule. The demolition component would also generate approximately 30 two-way employee and material delivery trips per day. It is estimated that the highest number of daily trips generated by the project is 75,assuming the overlapping of demolition and construction. The work area is limited in space, and the access road is too narrow to provide parking. Therefore,the site is not large enough to generate a higher volume of daily trips due to its limited capacity. Metals will be transported to a recycling facility located in the City of Long Beach, and the demolished concrete will be transported to either the Ewles Materials recycling facility in the City of Irvine or a similar facility. Access from the project site to the Ewles Materials recycling facility (located at 16081 Construction Circle West in Irvine)will be from Newport Coast Drive, the State 5/23/16 OAGEO100I E\AQ Analysis\AQ-GHG Memo.docxn 2 227 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Route 73 (SR-73)Toll Road, State Route 55 (SR-55), Interstate 405 (1-405),Jamboree Road, Barranca Parkway, and Construction Circle West. Solid waste materials (e.g., insulation, aluminum, gypsum, sheet metal, and wood waste)will be disposed at the Frank R. Bowerman Landfill in Irvine, which is owned and operated by the County of Orange(County). Access from the project site to the Frank R. Bowerman Landfill(located at 11002 Bee Canyon Access Road, Irvine)will be from Newport Coast Drive, the SR-73 Toll Road,the State Route 133 (SR-133) Toll Road, Interstate 5 (I-5),Sand Canyon Avenue, and the Bee Canyon Access Road. The majority of the vehicle trips for demolition will be for the off-site demolished concrete removal. Construction The construction of the temporary wireless communication facilities will occur during Fortistar's demolition activities. Four existing antenna arrays that provide cell coverage to the Newport Coast area are currently attached to the existing 105 ft high exhaust stack. The four carriers that own these antenna arrays are Sprint,AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile. Prior to the demolition of the 105 ft high exhaust stack, all four carriers will need to construct temporary wireless communication facilities at the project site and then remove the existing antenna arrays from the 105 ft high exhaust stack. There will be two temporary wireless communication facilities, each of which will be 60 feet tall. Both of the 60 ft tall temporary wireless communication facilities will have two antenna arrays attached, one located approximately 50 feet and the other approximately 55 feet from the ground surface. Currently, existing power units located on the project site provide power to their existing antenna arrays and will continue to provide power for both the proposed temporary and permanent wireless communication facilities at the project site. One will need to be replaced and a new power supply will be installed that will support both the temporary and permanent wireless communication facilities. Construction of the temporary wireless communication facilities will take approximately 5 weeks before they are operational and can begin to provide cellular coverage. The temporary wireless communication facilities will only be on the project site until the permanent wireless communication facilities are constructed and operational, which will occur in the fall of 2017 and after the migratory bird nesting season,which is from February 15 to September 15. Construction of the temporary wireless communication facilities will include equipment staging for approximately 1 week; delivery of the flower pot structure using a crane and semi-truck over 3 days; trenching and conduit installation from the perimeter wall to the flower pot structure using a drill rig and backhoe over 3 days;microwave dish installation and alignment with a boom truck(i.e., crane truck) over 1 day; and cable installation and antenna relocation to the flower pot over a 3-day period, which will include the decommissioning of existing antennas and other radiofrequency material from the 105 ft high exhaust stack and requiring the use of a boom truck. Construction and Operation of Permanent Wireless Communication Facilities.Once the two temporary wireless communication facilities are operational, and after all demolition activities are complete,the four carvers will begin work on the construction of the permanent wireless communication facilities in the fall of 2017, after the migratory bird nesting season(i.e., February 15 to September 15). There will be two 60 ft tall permanent wireless communication facilities. It is anticipated that the permanent wireless communication facilities will take approximately 3 months to 5/23/16 0AGE0100I E\AQ Analysis\AQ-GHG Memo.docxn 3 222 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. construct and will be operational by approximately November 2017, at which time the temporary cell towers will be removed from the project site. Construction of these permanent wireless communication facilities will include equipment staging for approximately 8 weeks; ground-ring trenching over a 3-day period using a drill rig and backhoe; inspection and installation of the foundation cage over 1 week using a boom truck;pouring of the foundation concrete with a cement truck and inspection over 1 week; curing time and tower delivery over 2 weeks; steel tower installation using a crane over 1 week; antenna relocations to the new towers (including dish alignment using a boom truck)over 1 week; and installation of the faux branches and inspection. EXISTING SETTING The project site is located in the City of Newport Beach,which is part of the South Coast Air Basin (Basin), and is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Climate/Meteorology Air quality in the planning area is affected not only by various emission sources (e.g.,mobile, industry)but also by atmospheric conditions such as wind speed,wind direction,temperature, and rainfall. The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine,and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. Climate in the Basin is determined by its terrain and geographical location. The Basin is a coastal plain with connecting broad valleys and low hills. The Pacific Ocean forms the southwestern border, and high mountains surround the rest of the Basin,which lies in the semipermanent high-pressure zone of the eastern Pacific, resulting in a climate that is mild and tempered by cool ocean breezes. This climatological pattern is rarely interrupted; however,periods of extremely hot weather, winter storms, or Santa Ana wind conditions do occur. The annual average temperature varies little throughout the Basin,ranging from the low to middle 60s,measured in degrees Fahrenheit(°F). With a more pronounced oceanic influence, coastal areas show less variability in annual minimum and maximum temperatures than inland areas. The climatological station closest to the site is the Newport Beach Harbor Station. The monthly average maximum temperature recorded at this station from 1921 to the present ranged from 63.2°F in December to 73.4°F in August,with an annual average maximum of 67.8°F. The monthly average minimum temperature recorded at this station ranged from 46.9°F in January to 63.2°F in August, with an annual average minimum of 54.6°F. January is typically the coldest month,and August is typically the warmest month in this area of the Basin. Most rainfall in the Basin occurs between November and April. Summer rainfall is minimal and is generally limited to scattered thundershowers in coastal regions and slightly heavier showers in the eastern portion of the Basin and along the coastal side of the mountains. The Newport Beach Harbor Field Station monitored precipitation from 1921 to the present,during which average monthly rainfall varied from 2.30 inches in February to 0.38 inch or less between May and October,with an annual 5/23/16 OAGEO100I E\AQ Analysis\AQ-GHG Memo.docxn 4 2�9 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. total of 11.00 inches. Patterns in monthly and yearly rainfall totals are unpredictable due to fluctuations in the weather. Although the Basin has a semiarid climate, air near the surface is generally moist because of the presence of a shallow marine layer. With very low average wind speeds,there is a limited capacity to disperse air contaminants horizontally. The dominant daily wind pattern is an onshore 8-to 12-mile— per-hour(mph) daytime breeze and an offshore 3 to 5 mph nighttime breeze. The typical wind flow pattern fluctuates only with occasional winter storms or strong northeasterly (Santa Ana)winds from the mountains and deserts northeast of the Basin. Summer wind flow patterns represent worst-case conditions because this is the period of higher temperatures and more sunlight,which results in ozone (03) formation. Temperature normally decreases with altitude, and a reversal of this atmospheric state, where temperature increases with altitude, is called an inversion. The height from the Earth to the inversion base is known as the mixing height.Persistent low inversions and cool coastal air tend to create morning fog and low stratus clouds. Cloudy days are less likely in the eastern portions of the Basin and are about 25 percent more likely along the coast. The vertical dispersion of air pollutants in the Basin is limited by temperature inversions in the atmosphere close to the Earth's surface. Inversions are generally lower in the nighttime when the ground is cool than during daylight hours when the sun warms the ground and, in turn,the surface air layer.As this heating process continues, the temperature of the surface air layer approaches the temperature of the inversion base,causing heating along its lower edge. If enough warming takes place, the inversion layer becomes weak and opens up to allow the surface air layers to mix upward. This can be seen in the middle to late afternoon on a hot summer day when the smog appears to clear up suddenly. Winter inversions typically break earlier in the day,preventing excessive contaminant buildup. The combination of stagnant wind conditions and low inversions produces the greatest pollutant concentrations. On days of no inversion or high wind speeds,ambient air pollutant concentrations are lowest. During periods of low inversions and low wind speeds, air pollutants generated in urbanized areas are transported predominantly onshore into Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. In the winter, the greatest pollution problem is the accumulation of carbon monoxide(CO)and nitrogen oxides(NOx)due to extremely low inversions and air stagnation during the night and early morning hours. In the summer,the longer daylight hours and the brighter sunshine combine to cause a reaction between hydrocarbons and NOx to form photochemical smog. Local Air Quality The SCAQMD, together with the California Air Resources Board(ARB),maintains ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The air quality monitoring station closest to the project site is the Costa Mesa Station on Mesa Verde Drive. This station is approximately 7.3 miles (mi)northwest of the project site, and its air quality trends are representative of the ambient air quality in the project area. The pollutants monitored at this station are CO,03,nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and sulfur dioxide (SO2). The closest station that monitors particulate matter less than 10 microns and 2.5 microns in size (PM16 and PM2,5,respectively)is the Mission Viejo Station at 26081 Via Pera, which is located approximately 8.6 mi east of the project site. The ambient air quality data monitored at these two stations within the past 3 years are listed in Table A. 5/23/16 0AGE0100I E\AQ Analysis\AQ-GHG Memo.docxn 5 230 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Table A: Ambient Air Quality in the Project Vicinity Pollutant Standard 2013 2014 2015 Carbon Monoxide CO —Costa Mesa at Mesa Verde Drive Maximum 1-hour concentration(ppm) 2.4 2.7 3.0 Number of days exceeded: State: >20 m 0 0 0 Federal: >35 ppm 0 0 0 Maximum 8-how concentration m) 2.0 1.9 2.2 Number of days exceeded: State: >9.0 ppm 0 0 0 Federal: >_9 m 0 0 0 Ozone(0 )—Costa Mesa at Mesa Verde Drive Maximum 1-hour concentration( pm) 0.095 0.096 0.099 Number of days exceeded: State: >0.09 pprn 1 1 1 Maximum 8-how concentration(ppm) 0.083 0.079 0.079 Number of days exceeded: State: >0.07 ppm 2 6 3 Federal: >0.07 ppm 2 6 3 Coarse Particulates(PM10)—Mission Viejo at 16081 Via Pera Maximum 24-how concentration m 51 41 49 Number of days exceeded: State: >50µg/m' I 0 0 Federal: > 150µg/m 0 0 0 Annual arithmetic avera a concentration( /m) 19 20 19 Exceeded for the ear: State: >20 ligle No No No Fine Particulates.(PM25)—Mission Vie'o at 26081 Via Pera Maximum 24-hour concentration( m ) 28 26 32 Number of days exceeded: Federal: >35 /m 0 0 0 Annual arithmetic average concentration(µg/m3) 8.1 8.3 7.0 Exceeded for the year: State: > > µg/m No No No Federal: > 15 /m No No No Nitrogen Dioxide NO2 —Costa Mesa at Mesa Verde Drive Maximum 1-hour concentration(ppm) 0.076 0.061 0.052 Number of days exceeded: State: >0.18 m 0 0 0 Federal: >0.10 ppm 0 0 0 Annual arithmetic avera a concentration m 0.011 0.011 0.012 Exceeded for the year: State:>0.030 ppm No No No Federal: >0.053 m No No No Sulfur Dioxide(SO2)—Costa Mesa at Mesa Verde Drive Maximum 24-hour concentration(ppm) 0.0012 0.0013 0.0011 Number of days exceeded: I State: >0.04 pprn 0 0 0 Maximum 1-how concentration m 0.004 0.009 0.005 Number of days exceeded: SMI 0.25 m No No No Federal: >0.075 ppm No No No Source:United States Environmental Protection Agency.AirData Air Quality Monitors.Website: http://www.epa.gov/airdata/ad_maps.html,accessed May 2016. µg/m3=micrograms per cubic meter EPA=United States Environmental Protection Agency ppm=parts per million The ambient air quality data in Table A show that CO,PM10,PM2.5,NO2 and SO2 levels are consistently below the relevant State and federal standards. The State and federal 8-hour 03 standards were exceeded 11 days in the last 3 years, and the State 1-hour 03 standard was exceeded 3 days over the last 3 years. 5/23/16 td':\GEO 1001 E\AQ Analysis\AQ-GHG Memo.docxn 6 231 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Air Pollution Constituents and Attainment Status The ARB coordinates and oversees both State and federal air pollution control programs in the State. The ARB oversees activities of local air quality management agencies and maintains air quality monitoring stations throughout the State in conjunction with the United States Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)and local air districts. The ARB has divided the State into 15 air basins based on meteorological and topographical factors of air pollution.Data collected at these stations are used by the ARB and EPA to classify air basins as attainment, nonattainment,nonattainment- transitional, or unclassified, based on air quality data for the most recent 3 calendar years compared with the ambient air quality standards(AAQS). Attainment areas may be: • Attainmem/unclassified("unclassifiable"in some lists), which have never violated the air quality standard of interest or do not have enough monitoring data to establish attainment or nonattainment status; • Attainment-maintenance (national ambient air quality standards [NAAQS] only),which violated an NAAQS that is currently in use (was nonattainment) in or after 1990,but now attains the standard and is officially redesignated as attainment by the EPA with a maintenance State Implementation Plan(SIP); or Attainment(usually only for California ambient air quality standards [CAAQS],but sometimes for NAAQS),which have adequate monitoring data to show attainment, have never been nonattainrnent, or, for NAAQS,have completed the official maintenance period. Nonattainment areas are imposed with additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The air quality data are also used to monitor progress in attaining air quality standards. Table B lists the attainment status for the criteria pollutants in the Basin. Table B: Attainment Status of Criteria Pollutants in the South Coast Air Basin Pollutant State Federal 03 1-hour Nonattainment No Federal Standard 03 8-hour Nonattainment Extreme Nonattainment PM" Nonattainment Attainment/Maintenance PM"' Nonattainment Moderate Nonattainment CO Attainment Unclassified/Attainment NO, Attainment Unclassified/Attaimnent SO2 Attainment Attainment Lead Attainment Unclassified/Attainment All others Attaimnent/Unclassified No Federal Standard Source: California Air Resources Board.Air Quality Standards and Area Designations. Website:http://w .arb.ca.gov/desig/desig.htm,accessed May 2016. 1 Except in Los Angeles County. CO=carbon monoxide PMto=particulate matter less than 10 microns in size NO2=nitrogen dioxide PM,_,=particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size 03=ozone SO2=sulfur dioxide 5/23/16 td':\GE01001 E\AQ Analysis\AQ-GHG Memo.docxn 7 232 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE Thresholds for Construction and Operational Emissions that have Regional Effects Table C shows the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) significance thresholds that have been established for the Basin. Projects in the Basin with construction-or operations-related emissions that exceed any of the emission thresholds should be considered significant under CEQA. Table C: SCAQMD Significance Thresholds Air Pollutant Construction VOCs 75 lbs/da CO 550 lbs/da NO, 100 lbs/day sox 150 lbs/da PM io 150 lbs/da PM2.5 55 lbs/da Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District(2016), www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality- significance-thresholds.pdf,accessed May 2016. CO=carbon monoxide lbs/day=pounds per day NOx=nitrogen oxides PMZ.S=particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size PMio=particulate matter less than 10 microns in size SCAQMD=South Coast Air Quality Management District SOx=sulfur oxides VOCs=volatile organic compounds Thresholds for Localized Significance The SCAQMD published its Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology in July 2008, recommending that all air quality analyses include an assessment of both construction and operational impacts on the air quality of nearby sensitive receptors from emissions of CO,NOx, PM10, and PM2.5. Localized significance thresholds(LSTs)represent the maximum emissions from a project site that are not expected to result in an exceedance of the NAAQS or CAAQS. LSTs are based on the ambient concentrations of that pollutant within the project's Source Receptor Area(SRA) and the distance to the nearest sensitive receptor. For this project,the appropriate SRA is the North Coastal Orange County area(Area 18). Sensitive receptors include residences, schools, hospitals, and similar uses that are sensitive to adverse air quality. The closest sensitive receptors are the homes on Marisol in the Tesoro community,located approximately 0.25 mi south of the project site. In the cases of CO and NO2, since ambient levels are below the CAAQS, as shown in Table A,the project would be considered to have a significant impact if project emissions result in a concentration at a significant receptor that exceeds the CAAQS. Even though the ambient levels of PMto and PM25 shown in Table A are less than the CAAQS and NAAQS, and since both are nonattainment pollutants,the significance criteria are the pollutant concentration thresholds presented in SCAQMD Rules 403 (SCAQMD 2005) and Rule 1301 (SCAQMD 1995). The Rule 403 threshold of 10.4 micrograms per cubic meter(µg m3) applies to construction emissions. The Rule 1301 threshold of 2.5 µg/m3 applies to operational activities. 5/23/16 td':\GE01001 E\AQ Analysis\AQ-GHG Memo.docxn 8 233 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. To avoid the need for every air quality analysis to perform air dispersion modeling,the SCAQMD performed air dispersion modeling for a range of construction sites less than or equal to 5 ac in size and created look-up tables that correlate pollutant emissions rates with project size to screen out projects that are unlikely to generate enough emissions to result in a locally significant concentration of any criteria pollutant. While the total project facility covers 4.14 ac,the area of this demolition and tower construction project is less than half of the total site and conservatively assumed to be approximately 2 ac for this analysis. Construction LST emission thresholds for a 2 ac site at 0.25 mi (425 meters)are applicable to the project. Therefore,the following LST emissions thresholds would apply during project construction. • 218 pounds per day(lbs/day) of NOx • 6,274 lbs/day of CO • 124 lbs/day of PM 10 • 69 lbs/day of PM2.5 AIR QUALITY IMPACT ANALYSIS Short-Term(Construction)Emissions Emissions of pollutants would occur during construction of the proposed project from soil disturbance and equipment exhaust. Major sources of emissions during demolition and construction include: (1)exhaust emissions from construction equipment and vehicles; and(2)fugitive dust generated by demolition activities, construction vehicles, and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces. Peak daily emissions associated with the on-site construction equipment,on-road haul trucks and vendor trips, and fugitive dust emissions during each of the construction tasks were calculated using California Emission Estimator Model (CalEEMOd)Version 2013.2.2. The total peak-day construction emissions are summarized in Table D and detailed in Appendix A. The emissions listed in Table D represent the maximum daily emissions generated during each phase of construction. Table D: Short-Term Regional Construction Emissions Total Regional Pollutant Emissions(lbs/da ) Fugitive Exhaust Fugitive Exhaust Construction Phase VOCs NOx CO SOx PMto PM" PM" PM23 Demolition 4.6 44 29 .05 1.4 2.4 .26 2.3 Temporary tower construction7 2.5 24 17 .02 .17 1.5 .05 1.4 Permanent tower construction 2.8 28 19 .03 .03 1.8 .01 1.6 Peak Daily 7.0 68 45 .O8 5.5 4.0 SCA MD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Emissions? No No No Na No No Source:Compiled by LSA Associates,Inc.(May 2016). CO=carbon monoxide SCAQMD=South Coast Air Quality Management District lbs/day=pounds per day SON=sulfur oxides NO,=nitrogen oxides VOCs=volatile organic compounds PMz s=particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size PMI0=particulate matter less than 10 microns in size 5/23/16 td':\GEO1001 E\AQ Analysis\AQ-GHG Memo.docxn 1�9 2s1 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Since on-site construction operations must comply with dust control and other measures prescribed by SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403, compliance with these rules is assumed in Table D. Table D shows that construction equipment/vehicle emissions during construction periods would not exceed any of the SCAQMD established daily emissions thresholds.No mitigation is required. Fugitive Dust Blowing dust, combined with engine emissions,produces airborne matter referred to in air quality studies as fugitive dust,which includes larger dust particles as well as PMIo and PM2.5.Fugitive dust emissions are generally associated with land clearing, exposure, and cut-and-fill operations. Once construction activities are complete,no further fugitive dust emissions occur. Dust generated daily during construction would vary substantially,depending on the level of activity,the specific operations, and weather conditions. Any nearby sensitive receptors and on-site workers may be exposed to blowing dust, depending on the prevailing wind conditions.Fugitive dust would also be generated as construction equipment or trucks travel on unpaved areas of the construction site. The PMIo and PM2.5 portions of the fugitive dust emissions are included in Table D. As indicated in Table D, compliance with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 would ensure that fugitive dust(PMIo and PM2.5) generation would be less than significant. Localized Significance The SCAQMD has issued guidance on applying CalEEMod modeling results to LST analyses.' Table E shows the results of applying this guidance to the CalEEMod results listed in Table D and shows the construction-related emissions of CO,NOx, PMIo, and PM25 compared to the LSTs. Table E: Summary of On-Site Construction Emissions, Localized Significance Emission Rates lbs/da Construction NO, COPMIo PM2.5' Emissions 41 25 3.3 2.4 Localized Significance Threshold 218 6,274 124 69 Exceed Significance? No No No No Source:Compiled by LSA Associates,Inc.(May 2016). Total PMio and PM,,5 daily emissions with fiigitive dust mitigation measures implemented. CO=carbon monoxide PM 10=particulate matter less than 10 microns in size lbs/day=pounds per day PM2.5=particulate matter less than 25 microns in size NON=nitrogen oxides ' South Coast Air Quality Management District.Fact Sheet for Applying CalEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds. Website:htip://www.agmd.eov/docs/default-source/cega/handbook/localized- sienificance-thresholds/caleemod-guidance.pdf,accessed May 2016. 5/23/16 td':\GE01001 E\AQ Analysis\AQ-GHG Memo.docxn 10 2__35 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Table E shows that the calculated emissions rates for the proposed on-site construction activities are below the LSTs for CO,NOx, PMIp, and PM2_5. Therefore,the proposed project would not cause any short-term localized air quality impacts, and no mitigation is required. Odors Odor complaints are most commonly associated with agricultural land uses,wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plans, composting,refineries, and landfills, etc. Objectionable odors may be emitted during the operation of diesel-fueled equipment during construction of the proposed project. However, these odors would be limited to the project site during construction and would disperse quickly. Therefore,these odors are not considered a significant impact. Long-Term (Operational)Emissions Long-term air emission impacts are associated with any change in permanent use of the project site by on-site stationary and off-site mobile sources that substantially increase emissions. The project consists of the demolition of an existing tower and gas-to-energy collection system and cell tower replacement at the Coyote Canyon Landfill. Once the demolition and construction operations are completed, there will be no new operational emissions from the project. Air Quality Management Plan Consistency One measure of determining if the project is consistent with the air quality plans is if the project will not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations, cause or contribute to new violations,or delay timely attainment of air quality standards of the interim emission reductions specified in the air quality plans. The main purpose of an air quality plan is to bring an area into compliance with the requirements of the federal and State air quality standards. Such plans describe the air pollution control strategies to be implemented by a city, county, or region. The most recent SCAQMD plan for attaining CAAQS, the 2012 Final Air Quality Management Plan(AQMP) (SCAQMD 2013),was approved by SCAQMD's Governing Board on December 7,2012. Because of the region's nonattainment status for ozone, PM2,5,and PMIp, if project-generated emissions of either of the ozone precursor pollutants (i.e.,reactive organic gases [ROGs] and NOx), PM2,5,or PMIp would exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds,then the project would be considered in conflict with the attainment plans. As supported in the analysis above,the proposed project would not result in significant air quality impacts. Therefore, no significant impact would occur regarding the project's consistency with the City of Newport Beach General Plan (2006) or the AQMP, and no mitigation measures are required. 5/23/16 0AGE01001E\AQAna1ysis\AQ-GHG Memo.docxn 11 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. STANDARD CONDITIONS SCAQMD Rules The project is required to comply with regional rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emissions. SCAQMD Rule 403 requires that fugitive dust be controlled with best available control measures(BACMs) so that the presence of such dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission source. In addition, SCAQMD Rule 402 requires implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance off site. Applicable dust suppression techniques from Rule 403 are summarized below. Implementation of these dust suppression techniques can reduce the fugitive dust generation(and thus the PMIo component). Compliance with these rules would reduce impacts on nearby sensitive receptors. • SCAQMD Rule 403 Measures o Water active sites at least twice daily(locations where grading is to occur will be thoroughly watered prior to earthmoving). o All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least 2 ft of freeboard in accordance with the requirements of California Vehicle Code(CVC) Section 23114(freeboard means vertical space between the top of the load and top of the trailer). o Traffic speeds on all unpaved roads shall be reduced to 15 miles per hour(mph) or less. • SCAQMD CEQA Handbook o Dust suppression measures ■ Revegetate disturbed areas as quickly as possible. ■ All streets shall be swept once per day if visible soil materials are carried to adjacent streets(recommend water sweepers with reclaimed water). ■ Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved roads, or wash trucks and any equipment leaving the site each trip. ■ All on-site roads shall be paved as soon as feasible, watered periodically, or chemically stabilized. ■ The area disturbed by clearing,grading, earthmoving, or excavation operations shall be minimized at all times. o The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on site based on low-emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers' specifications. o The construction contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible. o The construction contractor shall ensure that construction plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog season(May through October), the overall length of the construction period will be extended, thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day,to minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. 5/23/16 0AGE01001 E\AQ Analysis\AQ-GHG Memo.docxn 12 237 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. o The construction contractor shall time the construction activities so as to not interfere with peak-hour traffic and minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the site; if necessary, a flagperson shall be retained to maintain safety adjacent to existing roadways. o The construction contractor shall support and encourage ridesharing and transit incentives for the construction crew. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Methodology The recommended approach for GHG analysis included in the State of California Governor's Office of Planning and Research(OPR) June 2008 Technical Advisory is to: (1)identify and quantify GHG emissions,(2) assess the significance of the impact on climate change, and(3) if significant, identify alternatives and/or mitigation measures to reduce the impact to below a level of significance (OPR 2008).The June 2008 Technical Advisory provides some additional direction regarding planning documents as follows: "CEQA can be a more effective tool for GHG emissions analysis and mitigation if it is supported and supplemented by sound development policies and practices that will reduce GHG emissions on a broad planning scale and that can provide the basis for a programmatic approach to project-specific CEQA analysis and mitigation.... For local government lead agencies, adoption ofgeneral plan policies and certification ofgeneral plan EIRs that analyze broad jurisdiction-wide impacts of GHG emissions can be part of an effective strategy for addressing cumulative impacts and for streamlining later project-specific CEQA reviews"(June 2008 Technical Advisory, pages 7-8). Preliminary guidance from the OPR(OPR 2008)and recent letters from the Attorney General' critical of CEQA documents that have taken different approaches indicate that Lead Agencies should calculate, or estimate, emissions from vehicular traffic, energy consumption,water conveyance and treatment, waste generation, and construction activities. The SCAQMD has also issued recommendations regarding the methodology to be used to analyze GHG impacts in environmental documents prepared pursuant to CEQA. In October 2008, SCAQMD released a Draft Guidance Document—Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG)Significance Threshold2 that suggested a tiered approach to project analysis. According to the tiered approach, if a project is exempt from CEQA, Tier I would be the most appropriate tier,the project effects related to GHG emissions/global climate change (GCC)would be less than significant, and the analysis would be complete.If the project is not exempt and there is a State of California Department of Justice,Office of the Attorney General.Comment Letters filed under the California Environmental Quality Act.Website:http://oag.ca.gov/environment/ceqa/letters,accessed May 2016. 2 South Coast Air Quality Management District.Greenhouse Gases(GHG)CEQA Significance Thresholds. Website: http://www.agmd.gov/home/regulations/ceqa/air-quality-analysis-handbook/ghg-significance- thresholds/,accessed May 2016. 5/23/16 td':\GE01001 E\AQ Analysis\AQ-GHG Memo.docxn 13 238 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. local GHG reduction plan in place,then Tier 2 would be the most appropriate tier. If the project is consistent with that plan,then the project effects related to GHG emissions/GCC would be less than significant, and the analysis would be complete. If the project is not consistent with the plan,then the project would have a significant impact related to GHG emissions/GCC, and the analysis would be complete. If there is no local GHG reduction plan,Tier 3 is used to screen smaller projects. Both the SCAQMD and ARB screening thresholds categorize projects into two categories: "industrial"and "commercial/residential."If the project emissions are less than the applicable numerical threshold, then the project effects related to GHG emissions/GCC would be less than significant, and the analysis would be complete. If the project exceeds the numerical threshold, then the project should be analyzed using Tier 4. If the project emissions would meet the applicable Tier 4 16 percent reduction goal (based on the project's consistency with California's goals to reduce GHG emissions under Assembly Bill [ABI 32),then the project would have less than significant impacts related to GHG emissions/GCC, and the analysis would be complete.if the project exceeds both Tier 3 and Tier 4 thresholds,then the project would have a significant impact related to GHG emissions/GCC and the analysis would be complete. Tier 5 is not a threshold,but rather specifies that a project include all feasible on- and off-site measures to reduce GHG emissions, as well as financially support independent projects that have a net reduction in GHG emissions. Environmental Setting GCC is the observed increase in the average temperature of the Earth's atmosphere and oceans along with other significant changes in climate (e.g., precipitation or wind)that last for an extended time period. The term"global climate change"is often used interchangeably with the term"global warming,"but"global climate change" is preferred to"global warming"because it helps convey that there are other changes in addition to rising temperatures. "Global climate change"refers to any change in measures of weather(e.g.,temperature, precipitation, or wind) lasting for an extended period of time(decades or longer). GCC may result from natural factors (e.g., changes in the sun's intensity),natural processes within the climate system(e.g., changes in ocean circulation), or human activities(e.g.,the burning of fossil fuels,land clearing, or agriculture). The primary observed effect of GCC has been a rise in the average global tropospheric' temperature of 0.36°F per decade, determined from meteorological measurements worldwide between 1990 and 2005. Climate change modeling shows that further warming could occur,which would induce additional changes in the global climate system during the current century. Changes to the global climate system,ecosystems, and the environment of California could include higher sea levels, drier or wetter weather, changes in ocean salinity,and changes in wind patterns or more energetic aspects of extreme weather,including droughts,heavy precipitation,heat waves, extreme cold,and increased intensity of tropical cyclones. Specific effects in California might include a decline in the Sierra Nevada snowpack, erosion of California's coastline, and seawater intrusion in the Sacramento Delta. The troposphere is the zone of the atmosphere characterized by water vapor,weather,winds,and decreasing temperature with increasing altitude. 5/23/16 0AGE01001 E\AQ Analysis\AQ-GHG Memo.docxn 14 239 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Global surface temperatures have risen by 1.33'F+0.32°F over the last 100 years (1906-2005). The rate of warming over the last 50 years is almost double that over the last 100 years (IPCC 2013). latest projections,based on state-of-the art climate models, indicate that temperatures in California are expected to rise 3-10.5°F by the end of the century (CEC 2006). The prevailing scientific opinion on GCC is that"most of the warming observed over the last 60 years is attributable to human activities" (IPCC 2013). Increased amounts of carbon dioxide(CO2)and other greenhouse gases (GHGs) are the primary causes of the human-induced component of warming. The observed warming effect associated with the presence of GHGs in the atmosphere(from either natural or human sources)is often referred to as the greenhouse effect. GHGs are present in the atmosphere naturally,are released by natural sources,or are formed from secondary reactions taking place in the atmosphere. The gases that are widely seen as the principal contributors to human-induced GCC include:' • CO2 Methane (CH4) • Nitrous oxide(N20) • Hydrofluorocarbons(HFCs) • Perfluorocarbon (PFCs) • Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) Over the last 200 years, human activities have caused substantial quantities of GHGs to be released into the atmosphere. These extra emissions are increasing GHG concentrations in the atmosphere and enhancing the natural greenhouse effect,which is believed to be causing global warming. While GHGs produced by human activities include naturally occurring GHGs (e.g., CO2, CH4, and N20), some gases (e.g., HFCs,PFCs, and S176)are completely new to the atmosphere. Certain other gases (e.g., water vapor) are short-lived in the atmosphere as compared to the GHGs that remain in the atmosphere for significant periods of time, thereby contributing to GCC in the long term. Water vapor is generally excluded from the list of GHGs because it is short-lived in the atmosphere and its atmospheric concentrations are largely determined by natural processes, such as oceanic evaporation. For the purposes of this GCC evaluation,the term"GHGs"will refer collectively to the six gases identified in the hollered list provided above. These gases vary considerably in terms of global warning potential,which is a concept developed to compare the ability of each GHG to trap heat in the atmosphere relative to another gas. The global warming potential is based on several factors, including the relative effectiveness of a gas to absorb I The temperature on Earth is regulated by a system commonly known as the"greenhouse effect."Just as the glass in a greenhouse allows heat from sunlight in and reduces the amount of heat that escapes,greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide,methane,and nitrous oxide in the atmosphere keep the Earth at a relatively even temperature. Without the greenhouse effect,the Earth would be a frozen globe;therefore,although an excess of greenhouse gas results in global warming,the naturally occurring greenhouse effect is necessary to keep our planet at a comfortable temperature. 2 The GHGs listed are consistent with the definition in AB 32(Government Code 38505),as discussed later in this section. 5/23/16 td':\GEO 1001 E\AQ Analysis\AQ-GHG Memo.docxn 15 240 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. infrared radiation and the length of time that the gas remains in the atmosphere ("atmospheric lifetime"). The global warming potential of each gas is measured relative to CO2,the most abundant GHG. The definition of global warning potential for a particular GHG is the ratio of heat trapped by one unit mass of the GHG to the ratio of heat trapped by one unit mass of CO2 over a specified time period. GHG emissions are typically measured in terms of pounds or tons of"CO2 equivalents" (CO2e). Table F shows the global warming potential for each type of GHG. For example, SF6 is 23,900 times more potent at contributing to global warming than CO2. Table F: Global Warming Potential of Greenhouse Gases Atmospheric Lifetime Global Warming Potential Gas ears (100-year time horizon Carbon Dioxide(CO2) 50-200 1 Methane(CHq) 12 t3 21 Nitrous Oxide(N20) 120 310 HFC-23 264 11,700 HFC-134a 14.6 1,300 HFC-152a 1.5 140 PFGTetmfluoromethane CFo) 50,000 6,500 PFC:Hexafluoromethane(C2F6) 10,000 9,200 Sulfur Hexafluoride(SF6) 1 3,200 1 23,900 Source:First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan:Building on the Framework (ARB 2014).Website:http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/2013_update/first update_ climate_change_scoping_plan.pdf,accessed May 2016. HFC=hydrofluorocarbon PFC—perfluorocarbon Primary Greenhouse Gases. The following discussion summarizes the characteristics of the six primary GHGs. Carbon Dioxide.In the atmosphere, carbon generally exists in its oxidized form as CO2.Natural sources of CO2 include the respiration(breathing)of humans, animals, and plants; volcanic outgassing; decomposition of organic matter; and evaporation from the oceans. Human-caused sources of CO2 include the combustion of fossil fuels and wood,waste incineration,mineral production, and deforestation. The Earth maintains a natural carbon balance, and when concentrations of CO2 are upset, the system gradually returns to its natural state through natural processes.Natural changes to the carbon cycle work slowly, especially compared to the rapid rate at which humans are adding CO2 to the atmosphere. Natural removal processes (e.g., photosynthesis by land-and ocean-dwelling plant species) cannot keep pace with this extra input of human-made CO2; consequently, the gas is building up in the atmosphere. The concentration Of CO2 in the atmosphere has risen approximately 30 percent since the late 1800s.' In 2002, CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion accounted for approximately 98 percent of human-made CO2 emissions and approximately 84 percent of California's overall GHG emissions (CO2e). The transportation sector accounted for California's largest portion of CO2 California Climate Change. Climate Action Team Reports.Website:http://www.climatechange.ca.gov/ climate action team/reports/,accessed May 2016. 5/23/16<d':\GEO1001 E\AQ Analysis\AQ-GHG Memo.docxn 16 24 1 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. emissions,with gasoline consumption making up the greatest portion of these emissions. Electricity generation was California's second-largest category of GHG emissions. Methane.C1I4 is produced when organic matter decomposes in environments lacking sufficient oxygen. Natural sources include wetlands,termites, and oceans. Anthropogenic sources include rice cultivation, livestock, landfills and waste treatment,biomass burning, and fossil fuel combustion(burning of coal, oil, and natural gas, etc.). Decomposition occurring in landfills accounts for the majority of human-generated CH4 emissions in California, followed by enteric fermentation(emissions from the digestive processes of livestock).' Agricultural processes such as manure management and rice cultivation are also significant sources of human-made CH4 in California. C114 accounted for approximately 8 percent of gross climate change emissions(CO2e) in California in 2012 2 It is estimated that over 60 percent of global methane emissions are related to human-related activities(IPCC 2013). As with CO2,the major removal process of atmospheric CH4a chemical breakdown in the atmosphere—cannot keep pace with source emissions, and CH4 concentrations in the atmosphere are increasing. Nitrous Oxide.N20 is produced naturally by a wide variety of biological sources, particularly microbial action in soils and water. Tropical soils and oceans account for the majority of natural source emissions.N20 is a product of the reaction that occurs between nitrogen and oxygen during fuel combustion.Both mobile and stationary combustion emit N20, and the quantity emitted varies according to the type of fuel, technology, and pollution control device used, as well as maintenance and operating practices.Agricultural soil management and fossil fuel combustion are the primary sources of human-generated N20 emissions in California.N20 emissions accounted for nearly 7 percent of human-made GHG emissions(CO2e) in California in 2002. Hydrofluorocarbons, Perfluorocarbons, and Sulfur Hexafluoride.HFCs are primarily used as substitutes for ozone(03) depleting substances regulated under the Montreal Protocol.' PFCs and S176 are emitted from various industrial processes, including aluminum smelting, semiconductor manufacturing, electric power transmission and distribution, and magnesium casting. There is no aluminum or magnesium production in California; however, the rapid growth in the semiconductor industry,which is active in California, leads to greater use of PFCs. Total HFCs, PFCs,and SF6 accounted for approximately 3.5 percent of human-made GHG emissions (CO2e)in California in 2002.4 1 California Air Resources Board.California Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory–2015 Edition.Website: http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm,accessed May 2016. 2 Ibid. 3 The Montreal Protocol is an international treaty that was approved on January 1, 1989,and was designated to protect the ozone layer by phasing out the production of several groups of halogenated hydrocarbons believed to be responsible for ozone depletion. 4 California Climate Change. Climate Action Team Reports.Website:http://www.climatechange.ca.gov/ climate_action_team/reports/,accessed May 2016 5/23/16 OAGEO 1001 E\AQ Analysis\AQ-GHG Memo.docxn / 17 21 2 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Emissions Sources and Inventories.An emissions inventory that identifies and quantifies the primary human-generated sources and sinks of GHGs is a well-recognized and useful tool for addressing GCC. This section summarizes the latest information on global, national, California, and local GHG emission inventories. However,because GHGs persist for a long time in the atmosphere (see Table F), accumulate over time, and are generally well-mixed, their impact on the atmosphere and climate cannot be tied to a specific point of emission. Global Emissions.Worldwide emissions of GHGs in 2012 totaled 29 billion MT CO2C per year (MT CO2e/yr) (UNFCCC 2015). Global estimates are based on country inventories developed as part of the programs of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). United States Emissions.In 2013, the United States emitted approximately 6.7 billion MT CO2e, down from 7.3 billion MT CO2C in 2007. Of the six major sectors nationwide—electric power industry,transportation, industry,agriculture, commercial, and residential the electric power industry and transportation sectors combined account for approximately 70 percent of the GHG emissions; the majority of the electric power industry and all of the transportation emissions are generated from direct fossil fuel combustion. In 2013,the total United States GHG emissions were approximately 9.0 percent less than 2005 levels (EPA 2014). State of California Emissions. According to State ARB emission inventory estimates,the State emitted approximately 459 million metric tons of CO2e(MMT CO20 emissions in 2013. This is a decrease of 1.5 MMT CO2e from 2012 and a 7 percent decrease since 2004 (ARB 2015). The ARB estimates that transportation was the source of approximately 37 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2013,followed by electricity generation(both in-State and out-of-State) at 20 percent and industrial sources at 20 percent. The remaining sources of GHG emissions were residential and commercial activities at 9 percent, agriculture at 8 percent,high-GWP gases at 4 percent, and recycling and waste at 2 percent(ARB 2015). The ARB is responsible for developing the State GHG Emission Inventory. This inventory estimates the amount of GHGs emitted to and removed from the atmosphere by human activities within the State and supports the AB 32 Climate Change Program. The ARB's current GHG emission inventory covers the years 1990-2013 and is based on fuel use, equipment activity, industrial processes, and other relevant data(e.g.,housing, landfill activity, agricultural lands). The ARB staff have projected statewide unregulated GHG emissions for 2020,which represent the emissions that would be expected to occur in the absence of any GHG reduction actions,at 509 MMT CO2e. GHG emissions from the transportation and electricity sectors as a whole are expected to increase but remain at approximately 30 percent and 32 percent of total CO2e emissions,respectively (ARB 2014). Regional Emissions. Existing GHG emissions for the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)region were calculated for construction sources,mobile sources,natural gas consumption, and electricity generation. GHG emissions for 2009 were estimated to be approximately 176.79 MMT CO2e. Transportation and energy(i.e., electricity use and natural gas consumption) 5/23/16 aPAGEO100I E\AQ Analysis\AQ-GHG Memo.docxn 18 243 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. accounted for approximately 47 and 52 percent of emissions,respectively. Construction activity accounted for approximately 1 percent of the GHG emissions. Impact Significance Criteria The State CEQA Guidelines leave the determination of significance to the reasonable discretion of the lead agency and encourage lead agencies to develop and publish thresholds of significance for use in determining the significance of environmental effects in CEQA documents. Neither the SCAQMD nor the City has yet established specific quantitative significance thresholds for GHG emissions for constuction-only projects. Until more guidance is provided from federal or State agencies,the more conservative SCAQMD screening significance criteria level of 3,000 MT of CO2e per year will be used for the proposed project. However,given the frequency of changes in regulations over GHG emissions, this standard should be recognized as interim and will likely change over time as further guidance is provided by federal or State regulatory agencies. Impact Analysis Construction GHG Emissions.During construction of the proposed project, GHGs would be emitted through the operation of construction equipment and from worker and vendor vehicles, each of which typically use fossil-based fuels to operate. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHGs such as CO2,CH4, and N20.Furthermore, CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Exhaust emissions from on-site construction activities would vary daily as construction activity levels change. Table G lists the annual GHG emissions from project construction. Per SCAQMD guidance, due to the long-term nature of the GHGs in the atmosphere, instead of determining significance of construction emissions alone,the total construction emissions are amortized over 30 years (an estimate of the life of the project). Operational GHG Emissions. The project consists of the demolition of an existing tower and gas-to- energy collection system and cell tower replacement at the Coyote Canyon Landfill. Once the demolition and construction operations are completed, there will be no new operational emissions from the project. Thus,the equivalent annual GHG emissions from the project would be less than 10 MT/yr of CO2e. Table G: Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions Total Reg" nal Pollutant Emissions(MT/ r) Construction Phase CO, CH, N20 CO2e 2016Demolition 183 .04 0 184 Tem ora Tower Construction 28 <0.01 0 28 2017 1 Permanent Tower Construction 83 .02 0 83 Total Construction Emissions 293 .07 0 294 Amortized over 30 years 9.8 <0.01 0 9.8 Source:Compiled by LSA Associates, Inc.(May 2016). CHa=methane MT/yr=metric tons per year CO2=carbon dioxide N20=nitrous oxide CO2e=carbon dioxide equivalent 5/23/16 0AGEO1001E\AQAna1ysis\AQ-GHG Memo.docxn 19 244 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Therefore, equivalent annual GHG emissions would be below the screening threshold of 3,000 MT CO2C per year for commercial projects, and GHG emissions would be considered to have a less than significant impact. The proposed project would not impede or interfere with achieving the State's emission reduction objectives in AB 32 (and Executive Order S-03-05). No mitigation is required. REFERENCES California Air Resources Board(ARB). Air Quality Standards and Area Designations. Website: http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/desig.htm, accessed May 2016. May 2014.First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan:Building on the Framework Pursuant to AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. Website: http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/2013_update/first_update_climate_change_scoping_ plan.pdf, accessed May 2016. 2015. California Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory—2015 Edition. Website: http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm, accessed May 2016. California Energy Commission(CEC). July 2006. Our Changing Climate—Assessing the Risks to California. Website: http://www.energy.ca.gov/2006publications/CEC-500-2006-077/CEC- 500-2006-077.PDF,accessed May 2016. California Climate Change. Climate Action Team Reports. Website: http://www.climatechange.ca.gov/ climate—action team/reports/, accessed May 2016. City of Newport Beach.November 2006. General Plan. Website: http://www.newportbeachca.gov/ government/departments/community-development/planning-divi sion/general-plan-codes-and- regulations/general-plan, accessed May 2016. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2013. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Working Group 1 Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the JPCC. Website: http://www.climatechange20l3.org/, accessed May 2016. State of California Governor's Office of Planning and Research(OPR). June 2008. Technical Advisory—CEQA and Climate Change:Addressing Climate Change through California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)Review. Website: https://www.opr.ca.gov/docs/june08- ceqa.pdf, accessed May 2016. South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD). February 2013.Final 2012 AQMP. Website: http://www.agmd.gov/home/library/clean-air-plans/air-quality-mgt-plan/final-2012- air-quality-management-plan, accessed May 2016. July 2008.Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology. Website: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance- thresholds/final-1st-methodology-document.pdf, accessed May 2016. 5/23/16 OAGEO1001 E\AQ Analysis\AQ-GHG Memo.docxn �/20 215 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Greenhouse Gases (GHG) CEQA Significance Thresholds. Website: http://www.agmd.gov/ home/regulations/cega/air-quality-analysis-handbook/ghg-significance-thresholds/, accessed May 2016. 2005 (amended). Rule 403: Fugitive Dust. Website: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/defautt- source/rule-book/rule-iv/rule-403.pdf?sfvrsn=4, accessed May 2016. 1995 (amended). Rule 1301: General. Website: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/rule-book/reg-xiii/rule-1301-general.pdf?sfvrsn=4, accessed May 2016. Fact Sheet for Applying CaIEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds. Website: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/cega/handbook/localized-significance- thresholds/caleemod-guidance.pdf?sfvrsn=2, accessed May 2016. State of California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General. Comment Letters filed under the California Environmental Quality Act. Website: http://oag.ca.gov/environment/ cega/letters, accessed May 2016. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change(UNFCCC). 2015. Combined Total of Annex I and Non-Annex I Country COZe emissions, Greenhouse Gas Inventory Data. Website: http://unfcce.int/ghg_data/ghg_&ta_unfccc/items/4146.php, accessed April 2016. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). AirData Air Quality Monitors. Website: http://www.epa.gov/airdata/ad_maps.html, accessed May 2016. U.S. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report: 1990-2014. Website: http://www.epa.gov/ climatechange/emissions/usinventoryreport.html,accessed May 2016. Attachments: Figure 1 CalEEMod Modeling Runs 5/23/16 OAGEO100I E\AQ Analysis\AQ-GHG Memo.docxn 21 240 2. 9 `" �": I" .�"' - � ow• � .d a e Hyl uC'mo° _— ,78 rM fb'qv �'�•, •+t� rwt•garL - `.✓! \ RG1 �rdw.nm w.r air '.. gw i t .' �..- cn.,,,e^, y's �'+. ,""•. t 1°,, ,� 'A+"e, .,�, a „ry • n �yyE r I Y i JHca F d 6y. •,X,eY..O.. - ` � 4 E T j Q. J ♦4• c L'Im C. WASHES A �i �\■IIOr��L\� 261 Ns NEI In 241 Project Location 74 IN iii 1 • CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 5/11/2016 1:23 PM Coyote Canyon Landfill Tower Demolition and Replacement Project Orange County, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population User Defined Industrial 1.00 User Defined Unit 0.00 0.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq(Days) 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2017 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 630.89 CH4 Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/M Whr) (Ib/M W h r) (Ib/M Whr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use- Project includes construction of a cellular antenna tower. Construction Phase-Schedule per project plans Off-road Equipment- Equipment list per project plans. Off-road Equipment- Equipment per project plans. Off-road Equipment- Equipment list per project plans. Off-road Equipment- Equipment list per project plans. Demolition - Trips and VMT- Estimated delivery truck numbers for tower construction from project description. Consumer Products- No operational emissions. Landscape Equipment- No operational emissions. 242 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation _ tblConstructionPhase NumDays 0.00 79.00 PhaseStartDate 12/4/2016 911512017 LoadFactor 0.50 0.50 LoadFactor 0.40 0.40 quipment OffRoadEquipmentType Cranes quipment Excavators Crushing/Proc.Equipment q Plate Compactors uipment OffRoadEquipmentType quipment quipment ffRoadEquipmentType Other Material Handling Equipment Other Material Handling ipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 Operationaffear 2014 2017 VendorTr!pNumber 0.00 4.00 VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 2.QEmissions Summary 2.1Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 I CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year Ib/day Ib/day 2016 ; 7.0020 i 68.2413 ; 45.1417 ; 0.0752 ; 2.9561 ; 3.9812 i 6.9373 ; 0.5198 ; 3.7267 i 4.2465 i 0.0000 ;7,546.226;7,546.2263; 1.6580 i 0.0000 ;7,581.0434 3 .................................................d..................d................d..................i..................i.................d..................i..................ti.................d...................i..................5.................5.....................................o..................................... 2017 i 2.8402 i 28.1750 i 19.0413 ; 0.0270 ; 0.0250 ; 1.7851 i 1.8101 1.6423 i 1.6494 ; 0.0000 ;2,761.484;2,761.4845; 0.8206 i 0.0000 ;2,778.716 003 5 Total 9.8422 96.4163 64.1829 - 0.1022 2.9811 5.7663 8.7474 - 0.5269 - 5.3690 5.8959 0.0000 1 10,307.71 10,307.710- 2.4785 - 0.0000 10,359.75 08 8 8 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM PM70 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year ib/day Ib/day 2016 ; 7.0020 ; 68.2413 ; 45.1417 : 0.0752 ; 1.5284 ; 3.9812 ; 5.5097 E 0.3036 : 3.7267 ; 4.0303 ; 0.0000 :7,546.226:7,546.2263: 1.6580 E 0.0000 :7,581.043 3 ................................................o..................o................o....... .......i..................i.................o..................i..................o.................o...................i..................b.................o..................i..................o..................i.................. 2017 2.8402 i 28.1750 19.0413E 0.0270 i 0.0250 i 1.7851 i 1.8101 E 7.1200e- E 1.6423 i 1.6494 i 0.0000 i 2,761.484:2,761.4845: 0.8206 E 0.0000 :2,778.716 003 5 Total 9.8422 96.4163 64.1829 - 0.1022 1.5534 5.7663 7.3198 - 0.3107 - 5.3690 5.6798 1 0.0000 1 10,307.71 110,307.7101 2.4785 - 0.0000 110,359.751 08 8 8 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.89 0.00 16.32 41.03 0.00 3.67 1 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 I CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Area ii 1.00000- i 0.0000 i 1.00000-i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 2.2000e- i 2.2000e- i 0.0000 i i 2.3000e- .. .. oos ooa ooa ooa ooa ................................................... .......:.. .......... .......... ........... :.... :. 0.0000 . Energy i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ............................................................................................................i ........... ........... Mohilec 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.00008- 0.0000 1 1.00008- 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 2.2000e- I 2.2000e- 0.0000 0.0000 2.30008- 005 004 004 004 004 Mitigated Operational mm ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM70 Total PM2.5 PM2.i Total Category ib/day Ib/day Area ;; 1.00000- ; 0.0000 ; 1.o000e-E 0.0000 ; ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 p 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; ; 2.2000,- ; 2.2000e- E 0.0000 p ; 2.3000e- .. 005 004 004 004 004 ..............................m................-g..................d. ° .......... .......... ........... .. 0 . ... .,..I-.,. .._i. Energy ?? 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 0.0000 E E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E E 0.0000�E 0.0000 E 0.0000�E 0.0000 E 0.0000 .. .......... Mohi..e..........i..................a..................a.................... .............:.... ............e................e.....................................e.................a......................................e.................6.....................................e................. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .:.................. i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 1.0000e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.2000e- 2.2000e- 0.0000 0.0000 2.3000e- 005 004 004 004 004 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num DaysNum Days Phase Description Number I I I I I Wee I I 1 :Demolition Demolition 21011/2016 212/31/2016 2 61 79' ............................................... ............ .......................................... ........... ............ .................. ............................................................... :Temporary tower construction Ing 2 0............... 2 25 ......................................................................... ......... .................................................... ............... .................... ...................................................................................... 3 2 Permanent tower construction uilding Construction 29ii'97�E7 ?Ti5R617 2 62 662 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0 (Architectural Coating—sqft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Permanent tower construction :Cranes 4.00: 226: 3.79 ................................................................. ........................................................................... ................................ .................................... Permanent tower construction :Forklifts 2:: 6.00:: 89:: 0.20 ................. . ................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................. 5"...." ".......................................e.m.oIiiio.n. :Concrete/Industrial Saws 1: 8.00: 81: 0.73 ............................................................................................... .................................................................................................................. Permanent tower ion :Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2: 8.00: 97: 0.37 ......"i ..............................................................''...''..........................................................................................................................................................................................................banoIiin Craoes . 2; 8.00: 226: 0.29 .............................................. ...................................................................................................... Demolition......"'' ...........................................................:"'E...x'c"a­'v­a"t'o­'r's'......................................... . 8.00: 162: 0.38 ......"''i...........................................................'"''""'' ...'""'...''''..." .........'................. .........................................................................'',..............................",-...................................NemoIiton :Crushing/Prot.Equipment : 800: 85: 07 8 . ii'.......................................................... "'............."'"'-'................................. ......................................... ....................... , ..............................9............................ '...5;;�iton Flate Compactors E667 643' .............................................................................................................. ...................................................................................................... Tem. p"'o­r'a"'r'y...t'o'...w"'e'r...c'o'...n"s"t"'r'u...ct'i'o""n........... :Trenchers 1 8.00: so: 0.50 ?............................................................................................. Demolition :Rubber Tired Dozers 0.40 ................................ ................................ ................................... T;m,...po" Temporary...tower w"e'r...construction''...'""'... '"....................$:'T....ra"c"t'o"'r's'"/'L'"o"a...de"'r's"1'B...ac,"k-h...oe"s............... .........................................2": 8.00: 97: 0.37 ...'" "''...''..."''...''..."""''... '"'.................... ................................................................. ......... ................................ ...............I................ ...................................T;nporary tower construction :Other Material Handling Equipment: 2: 8.00: 167: 0.40 ................................................................. ......................................... ................................ ................................ ................................... 5a... Demolition'........................................................ .. 1iiio.n. :Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2: 6.00: 97: 0.37 ....................... ................................................................. ........................................................................... ................................ .................................... Permanent tower construction :Trenchers 1 8.00: 80: 0.50 ................................................................. ........................................... ................................ ................................ ................................... Permanent-' '......"'"" io,...tower c r o.os"t"w'...c"ti"o"n....................:Other Material Handling Equipment: 2: 8.00:: 167: 0.401 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition g: 23.00: 0.00: 854.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00`:LD_Mix :HDT_Mix :HHDT ..................................._._...i_._._._._._._._._._._.....5..........................F..........................i........................e..........................5...........................i........................d..................................d.........................d......................... Permanent tower 8 0.00: 4.00: 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.0011-D_Mix :HDT_Mix :HHDT nns}J.luainn............._._...i_._._._._._._._._._._.....5..........................6.............._._......i..._._.............._e..........................5...........................i........................e..................................d.........................d......................... emporary tower 5E 13.00; 4.00: 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.0011-D_Mix ::HDT_Mix ;HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Clean Paved Roads 3.2 Demolition - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM1D Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 2.3404 0.0000 2.3404 0.3544 0.0000 0.3544 0.0000 0.0000 ...............................ci...................i. .. .. ' .......... ........... .......... : .......... .. ...... ........:.... ....: ... .: Off-Road :: 4.2559 41.0958 24.9015 0.0403 2.3864 2.3864 2.2595 i 2.2595 4,049.496:4,049.4968; 0.9688 ;4,069.841 8 Total 4.2559 41.0958 24.9015 0.0403 2.3404 2.3864 4.7268 0.3544 2.2595 1 2.6139 1 4,049.496 4,049.4968 0.9688 1 4,069.841 8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO SO2 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO21 Total CO2 CH4 I N2HI PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day 253 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Hauling 5 0.1975 i 2.9788 E 2.1618 i 7.9500e- i 0.1883 E 0.0448 i 0.2331 i 0.0516 i 0.0412 i 0.0928 i E 801.3974: 801.3974 i 5.7000e- E E 801.5170 .. 003 003 ..........V.endor.........:i...................:...................i.................i.... . ......a.................: ......:. ......:... ...................................... .......... .......... 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ...............................ii...................i...................E.................E.................................................................................................i..................j....................i..................i..................i.......................................E..................................... Worker 0.0798 i 0.1031 1.2627 i 3.1200e- ; 0.2571 1.8000e- ; 0.2589 i 0.0682 i 1.6600e- ; 0.0698 i i 260.9584 260.9584 i 0.0123 261.2161 003 003 003 Total 0.2773 3.0818 3.4245 0.0111 0.4454 0.0466 0.4920 0.1197 0.0429 1 0.1626 1 1,062.355 1,062.3556 0.0180 1,062.7331 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 0.9127 0.0000 0.9127 0.1382 0.0000 0.1382 0.0000 0.0000 ...............................u...................:...................i.................i.... .......... ........... : ` .......... 2.38 ..............o.... ...c.................i.... .......o... ....:... Off-Road Ei 4.2559 i 41.0958 24.9015 i 0.0403 i 2.3864 i 2.3864 i 2.2595 i 2.2595 i 0.0000 :4,049.496:4,049.4968: 0.9688 :4,069.841 8 Total 4.2559 41.0958 . 24.9015 0.0403 0.9127 2.3864 3.2992 0.1382 2.2595 2.3977 0.0000 '4,049.496 14,049.49681 0.9688 - -4,069.841 8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO 502 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling EE 0.1975 E 2.9788 E 2.1618 E 7.9500e- E 0.1883 F 0.0448 E 0.2331 E 0.0516 E 0.0412 E 0.0928 E E 801.3974E 801.3974E 5.7000e- E E 801.5170 .. 003 003 ...............................E......................................i.................i................b.................d.................i..................b..................i..................i....................i..................i..................i..................b..................E..................b................ . Vendor E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 0.0000 E 0.0000 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E E 0.0000 ...............................EE...................i...................i.................F..................i.................3.................F..................i..................i..................i....................E..................E..................E..................d..................i.................. i................. Worker 0.0798 0.1031 1.2627 : 3.1200e- : 0.2571 : 1.8000e- : 0.2589 0.0682 1.6600e- : 0.0698 :260,9584: 260.9584 : 0.0123 : 261.2161 .. 003 003 003 Total 0.2773 3.0818 3.4245 0.0111 0.4454 0.0466 0.4920 0.1197 0.0429 1 0.1626 1 1,062.355 1,062.3558 0.0180 1.062.7331 8 �,�J y 3.3 Temporary tower construction - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day ib/day Off-Road 2.3888 23.6594 15.6932 : 0.0212 1.5417 1.54171.4183 1.4183 ;2,200.132:2,200.1320: 0.6636 :2.214.068 0 Total 2.3888 23.6594 15.6932 0.0212 1.5417 1.5411 1.4183 1.4183 2,200.132 2,200.1320 0.6636 2,214.068 0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E E 0.0000 ....................... .....................................Vendor E 0.0350 E 0.3460 E 0.4089 E 8.7000e- E 0.0250 E 5.48OOe-E 0.0305 E 7.1200e- E 5.0400e- E 0.0122 E E 86.7436 E 86.7436 E 6.2000e- E E 86.7565 004 003 003 003 004 ...............................:i...................i.................-i.................i................d.................d.................i..................b..................i..................i....................i..................i..................i..................d..................i................-b................. Worker E 0.0451 E 0.0583 E 0.7137 E 1.76OOe- E 0.1453 E 1.0200e- E 0.1463 E 0.0385 E 9.40000- E 0.0395 : 147.4982E 147.4982E 6.94OOe- : E 147.6439 003 003 004 003 Total 0.0801 0.4043 1.1225 2.6300e. 0.1703 6.5000e- 0.1768 0.0457 5.9800e- 0.0516 234.2418 234.2418 7.5600e- 234.4003 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site 2515 POG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Off-Road i 2.3888 i 23.6594 : 15.6932 i 0.0212 i : 1.5417 i 1.5417 i i 1.4183 i 1.4183 i 0.0000 :2,200.132:2,200.1320: 0.6636 : :2,214.068 0 Total 2.3888 23.6594 15.6932 0.0212 1.5417 1.5417 1.4183 1.4183 0.0000 2,200.132 2,200.1320 0.6636 2,214.068 0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling :: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................::. . ..........................:.................:............... ......................................................:.........................................................:..................:..................°...................:....................................:.................. Vendor ; 0.0350 ; 0.3460 0.4089 ; 8.7000e- ; 0.0250 5.4800e- ; 0.0305 ; 7.1200e- ; 5.04000- ; 0.0122 ; 86.7436 : 86.7436 ; 6.2000e- : 86.7565 004 003 003 003 004 ............................... ...................................._.................:.....................................:...................................:...................:......................................:..................:..................:...................:....................................:.................. Worker 0.0451 ; 0.0583 E 0.7137 ; 1.7600e- ; 0.1453 1.0200e- ; 0.1463 ; 0.0385 ; 9.4000e- ; 0.0395 ; : 147.4982: 147.4982 ; 6.94000- : : 147.6439 003 003 004 003 Total 0.0801 j 0.4043 . 1.1225 j 2.6300e- j 0.1703 - 6.5000e-j 0.1768 j 0.0457 j 5.9800e. j 0.0516 j .234.2418. 234.2418 j 7.5600e- . . 234.4003 003 003 003 003 3.4 Permanent tower construction -2017 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Off-Road 2.8079 27.8602 : 18.6566 : 0.0262 1.7802 1.7802 1.6378 1.6378 :2,676.152:2,676.1528: 0.8200 : :2,693.3721 8 250 Total 2.8079 � 27.8602 1 18.6566 0.0262 1.7802 1.7802 1.6379 1 1.6378 1 2,676.152 2,676.1528 0.8200 12,693.3721 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site LROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 INBio-CO21 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I Category lb/day lb/day 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0 ..........��W......... ........................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................ 0.0323 0.3148 0.3846 8.6000e- 0.0250 4.89000- 0.0299 7.12000- 4.5000e- 0.0116 85.3317 85.3317 6.00000- 85.3442 004 003 003 003 004 ..........W.. ......................................................................... ................. ................................... .............................................................................................................. .................................... ........ .......... 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000 omoo 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 Total 0.0323 0.3148 0.3846 8.6000e. 0.0250 4.8900e. 0.0299 7.1200e- 4.5000e- 0.0116 85.3317 85.3317 6.0000e . 85.3442 - 1 004 003 003 003 004 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG I NOx I CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 INIBio,CO21 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.8079 27.8602 18.6566 0.0262 1.7802 1.7802 1.6378 1.6378 0.0000 2,676.152:2T676.1528: 0.8200 :2,693.3721 .2,693.3721 Total 2.8079 27.8602 18.6566 0.0262 1.7802 1.7802 1.6378 1.6378 0.0000 1 2,676.152 12,676.15281 0.8200 1 L. 1 8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 257 ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ii 0.0000 iN . 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 ...............................ii...................i...................i.................i..................4.................4.................i..................d..................i..................i....................i..................i..................i..................4..................i..................4................. Vendor i 0.0323 i 0.3148 i 0.3846 i 8.6000e- i 0.0250 i 4.8900e- i 0.0299 i 7.1200e- i 4.5000e- i 0.0116 i i 85.3317 i 85.3317 i 6.0000e- i i 85.3442 004 003 003 003 004 ...............................ii...................i...................i.................i..................d.................4.................i..................i..................i..................i....................i..................i..................i..................5.................. i..................i................. Worker 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 0.0323 0.3148 0.3846 8.6000e- 0.0250 4.8900e- 0.0299 7.1200e- 4.5000e- 0.0116 85.3317 85.3317 6.0000e- 85.3442 004 003 003 003 004 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile LROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated i; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 p 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; p 0.0000 p 0.0000 ; 0.0000 p p 0.0000 ......U........ ...............jj...,.., ....................................y................y................p.................: . ............................ i .......... i .......... 00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000nmtgated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0000 0.0000 0.0o00 0.0000 0.0000 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday tiaturclay Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT User Defined Industrial 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 �J�g 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip% Trip Purpose% Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW I I IH-W or C- H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-6y User Defined Industrial 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 ILDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY I SBUS MH 0.510449; 0.057012; 0.191854 0.151889: 0.041459; 0.005887; 0.015572; 0.014818; 0.001440; 0.002145; 0.004716; 0.000509: 0.002251 5.0 Energy Detail 4.4 Fleet Mix Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy LROGNOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day NaturalGas 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated ...............................Ei...................i...................:. ' .......... ........... .......... 0 0 .00 .. ................. .............:.... ....:.. .......:.. NaturalGas 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG I NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total ��9 Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day User Defined 0 p 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 p 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 p 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Industrial Total U.00t10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx m=7 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day User Defined 0 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Industrial Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG I NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2o PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated EE 1.0000e- E 0.0000 E 1.0000e-E 0.0000 E E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E E 2.2000e- E 2.2000e- E 0.0000 E E 2.3000e- .. 005 004 004 004 004 ................................................d..................n................b..................i..................i.................n..................i..................6.................d...................i..................5.................b..................i..................n..................i.................. Unmitigated EE 1.00000- E 0.0000 : 1.00000-E 0.0000 E E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E E 2.2000e- : 2.2000e- E 0.0000 E E 2.3000e- 005 004 004 004 004 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated LROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory b/day Ib/day Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating ..............................a................... ..................i................. .................i.............. .......... ........... .......... .......... ........... Consumer 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products ..............................W.................. ..................4................9..................1..................1.................4..................1..................0.................9.....................................P.................P..................1.................. P..................1.................. Landscaping :: 1.0000e- 0.0000 : 1.0000e-: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : 2.2000e- : 2.2000e- : 0.0000 2.3000e- .. 005 004 004 004 004 Total 1.000Oe- 0.0000 1.000Oe-. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.2000e 2.2000e- . 0.0000 2.3000e. 005 004 004 004 004 Mitigated ROG I NOx CO SO2 Fugitive ExhaustPM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : : 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 Coating ................................................d..................n................b..................i..................i... . .......... ........... .......... .......... ........... .......r.... ....a. ......a.... Consumer 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products ............1..0..00Oe-.. ...7:.... ..... .. .............i.1....0.. .00Oe-.. ......;i....0....0...0.00.......i..._._..........E.................:...................F.................. ................. ...................i..................:..................:.;..................i..................:...................i.................. Landscapi . 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000:. .: : 2.2000e- 2.2000e- : 0.0000 ng : i 2.3000e- 005 004 004 004 004 Total 1.0000e. 0.0000 1.0000e. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.2000e- 2.2000e- 0.0000 2.3000e- 005 004 004 004 004 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water ?�-1 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Off road Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation 202 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 5/11/2016 1:24 PM Coyote Canyon Landfill Tower Demolition and Replacement Project Orange County, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population User Defined Industrial 1.00 User Defined Unit 0.00 0.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq(Days) 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2017 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 630.89 CH4 Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/M Whr) (lb/M W h r) (Ib/M Whr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use- Project includes construction of a cellular antenna tower. Construction Phase-Schedule per project plans Off-road Equipment- Equipment list per project plans. Off-road Equipment- Equipment per project plans. Off-road Equipment- Equipment list per project plans. Off-road Equipment- Equipment list per project plans. Demolition - Trips and VMT- Estimated delivery truck numbers for tower construction from project description. Consumer Products- No operational emissions. Landscape Equipment- No operational emissions. 203 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation _ tblConstructionPhase NumDays 0.00 79.00 PhaseStartDate 12/4/2016 911512017 LoadFactor 0.50 0.50 LoadFactor 0.40 0.40 quipment OffRoadEquipmentType Cranes quipment Excavators Crushing/Proc.Equipment q Plate Compactors uipment OffRoadEquipmentType quipment quipment ffRoadEquipmentType Other Material Handling Equipment Other Material Handling ipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 Operationaffear 2014 2017 VendorTr!pNumber 0.00 4.00 VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 2.QEmissions Summary 2.1Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ����� Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 Total CO2 I CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year Ib/day Ib/day 2016 ; 7.0261 i 68.3677 i 45.4288 ; 0.0749 i 2.9561 ; 3.9814 ; 6.9374 0.5198 ; 3.7269 ; 4.2466 i 0.0000 ;7,521.972;7,521.9726:: 1.658 i 0.0000 ;7,556.791 6 ..............................di..................d..................d................d..................i..................i.................d..................i..................ti.................d...................i..................5.................5..................E..................o..................................... 2017 i 2.8436 i 28.1822 i 19.1228 ; 0.0270 ; 0.0250 ; 1.7852 i 1.8102 ; 7.1200¢- ; 1.6424 i 1.6495 2,760.763;2,760.7632: 0.8206 i 0.0000 :2,777.9954 003 2 Total 9.8697 96.5499 64.5516 - 0.1019 2.9811 5.7666 8.7476 - 0.5269 - 5.3692 5.8961 1 0.0000 110,282.73110,282.735 2.4786 - 0.0000 10,334.78 58 8 1 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx C0 SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM70 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year ib/day Ib/day 2016 ; 7.0261 ; 68.3677 ; 45.4288E 0.0749 ; 1.5284 ; 3.9814 ; 5.5098 E 0.3036 : 3.7269 ; 4.0305 ; 0.0000 :7.521.972:7,521A726: 1.6581 E 0.0000 :7,556.791 6 ...............................1...................o..................o................o....... .......i..................i.................o..................i..................o.................o......................................b.................b..................i..................o..................i.................. 2017 Ei 2.8436 i 28.1822 19.1228E 0.0270 i 0.0250 i 1.7852 i 1.8102 E 7.1200e- E 1.6424 i 1.6495 i 0.0000 i 2,760.763:2,760.7631: 0.8206 E 0.0000 :2.777.9954 003 1 Total 9.8697 96.5499 64.5516 . 0.1019 1.5534 5.7666 7.3200 - 0.3107 - 5.3692 5.6800 1 0.0000 10,282.73 110,282.7351 2.4786 - 0.0000 10,334.78 57 7 1 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.89 0.00 16.32 41.03 0.00 3.67 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 I CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Area ii 1.00000- i 0.0000 i 1.00000-i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 2.2000e- i 2.2000e- i 0.0000 i i 2.3000e- .. .. oos ooa ooa ooa ooa ................................................... .......:.. .......... .......... ........... :.... :. 0.0000 . Energy i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ............................................................................................................i ........... ........... Mohilec 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.00008- 0.0000 1 1.00008- 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 2.2000e- I 2.2000e- 0.0000 0.0000 2.30008- 005 004 004 004 004 Mitigated Operational mm ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM70 Total PM2.5 PM2.i Total Category ib/day Ib/day Area ;; 1.00000- ; 0.0000 ; 1.o000e-E 0.0000 ; ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 p 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; ; 2.2000,- ; 2.2000e- E 0.0000 p ; 2.3000e- .. 005 004 004 004 004 ..............................m................-g..................d. ° .......... .......... ........... .. 0 . ... .,..I-.,. .._i. Energy ?? 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 0.0000 E E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E E 0.0000�E 0.0000 E 0.0000�E 0.0000 E 0.0000 .. .......... Mohi..e..........i..................a..................a.................... .............:.... ............e................e.....................................e.................a......................................e.................6.....................................e................. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .:.................. i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 1.0000e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.2000e- 2.2000e- 0.0000 0.0000 2.3000e- 005 004 004 004 004 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num DaysNum Days Phase Description Number I I I I I Wee I I 1 :Demolition Demolition 21011/2016 212/31/2016 2 61 79' ............................................... ............ .......................................... ........... ............ .................. ............................................................... :Temporary tower construction Ing 2 0............... 2 25 ......................................................................... ......... .................................................... ............... .................... ...................................................................................... 3 2 Permanent tower construction uilding Construction 29ii'97�E7 ?Ti5R617 2 62 662 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0 (Architectural Coating—sqft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Permanent tower construction :Cranes 4.00: 226: 3.79 ................................................................. ........................................................................... ................................ .................................... Permanent tower construction :Forklifts 2:: 6.00:: 89:: 0.20 ................. . ................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................. 5"...." ".......................................e.m.oIiiio.n. :Concrete/Industrial Saws 1: 8.00: 81: 0.73 ............................................................................................... .................................................................................................................. Permanent tower ion :Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2: 8.00: 97: 0.37 ......"i ..............................................................''...''..........................................................................................................................................................................................................banoIiin Craoes . 2; 8.00: 226: 0.29 .............................................. ...................................................................................................... Demolition......"'' ...........................................................:"'E...x'c"a­'v­a"t'o­'r's'......................................... . 8.00: 162: 0.38 ......"''i...........................................................'"''""'' ...'""'...''''..." .........'................. .........................................................................'',..............................",-...................................NemoIiton :Crushing/Prot.Equipment : 800: 85: 07 8 . ii'.......................................................... "'............."'"'-'................................. ......................................... ....................... , ..............................9............................ '...5;;�iton Flate Compactors E667 643' .............................................................................................................. ...................................................................................................... Tem. p"'o­r'a"'r'y...t'o'...w"'e'r...c'o'...n"s"t"'r'u...ct'i'o""n........... :Trenchers 1 8.00: so: 0.50 ?............................................................................................. Demolition :Rubber Tired Dozers 0.40 ................................ ................................ ................................... T;m,...po" Temporary...tower w"e'r...construction''...'""'... '"....................$:'T....ra"c"t'o"'r's'"/'L'"o"a...de"'r's"1'B...ac,"k-h...oe"s............... .........................................2": 8.00: 97: 0.37 ...'" "''...''..."''...''..."""''... '"'.................... ................................................................. ......... ................................ ...............I................ ...................................T;nporary tower construction :Other Material Handling Equipment: 2: 8.00: 167: 0.40 ................................................................. ......................................... ................................ ................................ ................................... 5a... Demolition'........................................................ .. 1iiio.n. :Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2: 6.00: 97: 0.37 ....................... ................................................................. ........................................................................... ................................ .................................... Permanent tower construction :Trenchers 1 8.00: 80: 0.50 ................................................................. ........................................... ................................ ................................ ................................... Permanent-' '......"'"" io,...tower c r o.os"t"w'...c"ti"o"n....................:Other Material Handling Equipment: 2: 8.00:: 167: 0.401 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition g: 23.00: 0.00: 854.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00`:LD_Mix :HDT_Mix :HHDT ..................................._._...i_._._._._._._._._._._.....5..........................F..........................i........................e..........................5...........................i........................d..................................d.........................d......................... Permanent tower 8 0.00: 4.00: 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.0011-D_Mix :HDT_Mix :HHDT nns}J.luainn............._._...i_._._._._._._._._._._.....5..........................6.............._._......i..._._.............._e..........................5...........................i........................e..................................d.........................d......................... emporary tower 5E 13.00; 4.00: 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.0011-D_Mix ::HDT_Mix ;HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Clean Paved Roads 3.2 Demolition - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM1D Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 2.3404 0.0000 2.3404 0.3544 0.0000 0.3544 0.0000 0.0000 ...............................ci...................i. .. .. ' .......... ........... .......... : .......... .. ...... ........:.... ....: ... .: Off-Road :: 4.2559 41.0958 24.9015 0.0403 2.3864 2.3864 2.2595 i 2.2595 4,049.496:4,049.4968; 0.9688 ;4,069.841 8 Total 4.2559 41.0958 24.9015 0.0403 2.3404 2.3864 4.7268 0.3544 2.2595 1 2.6139 1 4,049.496 4,049.4968 0.9688 1 4,069.841 8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO SO2 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO21 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 P102.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day ..........Haung..........ii.............................................................................................._..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 0.2112 3.0808 i 2.4812 7.9400e- i 0.1883 i 0.0449 0.2332 i 0.0516 0.0413 0.0929 i 799.4873 799.4873 i 5.7700e- i 799608 .. 003 003 ..........V.endor.........:i...................:...................i.................i.... . ......a.................: ......:. ......:... ...................................... .......... .......... 0000 0000 0000 00000 0000 0000 0000 00000 00000 0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ...............................ii...................i...................E.................E.................................................................................................i..................j....................i..................i..................i.......................................E..................................... Worker ii 0.0840 i 0.1134 1.1893 i 2.9500e- ; 0.2571 1.8000e- ; 0.2589 i 0.0682 i 1.6600e- ; 0.0698 i i 247.1506 247.1506 i 0.0123 247.4083 003 003 003 Total 0.2952 3.1942 3.6705 0.0109 0.4454 0.0467 0.4921 0.1197 0.0430 0.1627 1,046.637 1,046.6379 0.0180 1,047.016 9 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 0.9127 0.0000 0.9127 0.1382 0.0000 0.1382 0.0000 0.0000 ...............................u...................:...................i.................i.... .......... ........... : ` .......... 2.38 ..............o.... ...c.................i.... .......o... ....:... Off-Road Ei 4.2559 i 41.0958 24.9015 i 0.0403 i 2.3864 i 2.3864 i 2.2595 i 2.2595 i 0.0000 :4,049.496:4,049.4968: 0.9688 :4,069.841 8 Total 4.2559 41.0958 . 24.9015 0.0403 0.9127 2.3864 3.2992 0.1382 2.2595 2.3977 0.0000 '4,049.496 14,049.49681 0.9688 - -4,069.841 8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO 502 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling EE 0.2112 E 3.0808 E 2.4812 E 7.9400e- E 0.1883 F 0.0449 E 0.2332 E 0.0516 E 0.0413 E 0.0929 E E 799.4873E 799.4873E 5.7700e- E E 799.6085 003 003 ...............................E......................................i.................i................b.................d.................i..................b..................i..................i....................i..................i..................i..................b..................E..................b................. Vendor E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 0.0000 E 0.0000 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E E 0.0000 ...............................EE...................i...................i.................F..................i.................3.................F..................i..................i..................i....................E..................E..................E..................d..................E.................. i................. Worker 0.0840 0.1134 1.1893 : 2.9500e- : 0.2571 : 1.8000e- : 0.2589 0.0682 1.6600e- : 0.0698 :247.1506: 247.1506 : 0.0123 : 247.4083 .. 003 003 003 Total 0.2952 3.1942 3.6705 0.0109 0.4454 0.0467 0.4921 0.1197 0.0430 1 0.1627 1 1 1,046.6371177rg!77FT777 1,047.016 9 3.3 Temporary tower construction - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day ib/day Off-Road 2.3888 23.6594 15.6932 : 0.0212 1.5417 1.54171.4183 1.4183 ;2,200.132:2,200.1320: 0.6636 :2.214.068 0 Total 2.3888 23.6594 15.6932 0.0212 1.5417 1.5411 1.4183 1.4183 2,200.132 2,200.1320 0.6636 2,214.068 0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E E 0.0000 ....................... .....................................Vendor E 0.0388 E 0.3542 E 0.4914 E 8.6000e- E 0.0250 E 5.54OOe-E 0.0305 E 7.1200e- E 5.09000- E 0.0122 E E 86.0122 E 86.0122 E 6.3000e- E E 86.0255 004 003 003 003 004 .......... .....................:E.......................................E.................E.................d.................d.................E..................b.....................................i....................i..................i..................i..................d..................E..................b................. Worker 0.0475 E 0.0641 E 0.6722 E 1.6700e- E 0.1453 E 1.0200e- E 0.1463 E 0.0385 E 9.40000- E 0.0395 E E 139.6938E 139.6938E 6.94OOe- : E 139.8395 003 003 004 003 Total 0.0863 0.4182 1.1636 2.5300e. 0.1703 6.5600e- 0.1769 0.0457 6.0300e- 0.0517 225.7060 225.7060 7.5700e- 225.8650 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site POG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Off-Road i 2.3888 i 23.6594 : 15.6932 i 0.0212 i : 1.5417 i 1.5417 i i 1.4183 i 1.4183 i 0.0000 :2,200.132:2,200.1320: 0.6636 : :2,214.068 0 Total 2.3888 23.6594 15.6932 0.0212 1.5417 1.5417 1.4183 1.4183 0.0000 2,200.132 2,200.1320 0.6636 2,214.068 0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling :: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................::. . ..........................:.................:.........................................................................:.........................................................:..................:..................:...................:....................................:.................. Vendor ; 0.0388 ; 0.3542 0.4914 ; 8.6000e- ; 0.0250 5.5400e- ; 0.0305 ; 7.1200e- ; 5.09000- ; 0.0122 ; 86.0122 : 86.0122 ; 6.3000e- : 86.0255 004 003 003 003 004 ............................... ...................................._.................:.....................................:...................................:...................:......................................:..................:..................:...................:....................................:.................. Worker 0.0475 ; 0.0641 E 0.6722 ; 1.6700e- ; 0.1453 1.0200e- ; 0.1463 ; 0.0385 ; 9.4000e- ; 0.0395 ; : 139.6938: 139.6936 ; 6.94000- : : 139.8395 003 003 004 003 Total 0.0863 0.4182 - 1.1636 2.5300e- 0.1703 - 6.5600e- 0.1769 0.0457 6.0300e. 1 0.0517 � .225.7060. 225.7060 1 7.5700e- . . 225.8650 003 003 003 003 3.4 Permanent tower construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Off-Road 2.8079 27.8602 : 18.6566 : 0.0262 1.7802 1.7802 1.6378 1.6378 :2,676.152:2,676.1528: 0.8200 : :2,693.3721 8 272 Total 2.8079 � 27.8602 1 18.6566 0.0262 1.7802 1.7802 1.6379 1 1.6378 1 2,676.152 2,676.1528 0.8200 12,693.3721 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site LROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 INBio-CO21 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I Category lb/day lb/day 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0 ..........��W......... ........................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................ 0.0357 0.3220 0.4662 8.6000e- 0.0250 4.94000- 0.0300 7.12000- 4.5500e- 0.0117 84.6104 84.6104 6.20000- 84.6233 004 003 003 003 004 ..........W.. ......................................................................... ................. ................................... .............................................................................................................. .................................... ........ .......... 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000 omoo 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0357 0.3220 0.4662 8.6000e. 0.0250 4.9400e- 0.0300 7.1200e- 4.5500e- 0.0117 84.6104 84.6104 6.2000e. 1 004 003 003 003 004 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG I NOx I CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 INIBio,CO21 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.8079 27.8602 18.6566 0.0262 1.7802 1.7802 1.6378 1.6378 0.0000 2,676.152:2T676.1528: 0.8200 :2,693.3721 .2,693.3721 Total 2.8079 27.8602 18.6566 0.0262 1.7802 1.7802 1.6378 1.6378 1 0.0000 12,676.15212,676.15281 0.8200 1 L. 1 8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 272 ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ii 0.0000 iN . 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 ...............................ii...................i...................i.................i..................4.................4.................i..................d..................i..................i....................i..................i..................i..................4..................i..................4................. Vendor i 0.0357 i 0.3220 i 0.4662 i 8.6000e- i 0.0250 i 4.9400e- i 0.0300 i 7.1200e- i 4.5500e- i 0.0117 i i 84.6104 i 84.6104 i 6.2000e- i i 84.6233 004 003 003 003 004 ...............................ii...................i...................i.................i..................d.................4.................i..................i..................i..................i....................i..................i..................i..................5.................. i..................i................. Worker 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 0.0357 0.3220 0.4662 8.6000e- 0.0250 4.9400e- 0.0300 7.1200e- 4.5500e- 0.0117 84.6104 84.6104 6.2000e- 84.6233 004 003 003 003 004 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile LROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated F; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 p 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; p 0.0000 p 0.0000 ; 0.0000 p p 0.0000 ......U........ ...............jj...,.., ....................................y................y................p.................: . ............................ i .......... i .......... 00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000nmtgated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0000 0.0000 0.0o00 0.0000 0.0000 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday tiaturclay Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT User Defined Industrial 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 2j 3 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip% Trip Purpose% Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW I I IH-W or C- H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-6y User Defined Industrial 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 ILDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY I SBUS MH 0.510449; 0.057012; 0.191854 0.151889: 0.041459; 0.005887; 0.015572; 0.014818; 0.001440; 0.002145; 0.004716; 0.000509: 0.002251 5.0 Energy Detail 4.4 Fleet Mix Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy LROGNOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day NaturalGas 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated ...............................Ei...................i...................:. ' .......... ........... .......... 0 0 .00 .. ................. .............:.... ....:.. .......:.. NaturalGas 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG I NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total ��"T Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day User Defined 0 p 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 p 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 p 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Industrial Total U.00t10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx m=7 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day User Defined 0 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Industrial Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG I NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2o PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated EE 1.0000e- E 0.0000 E 1.0000e-E 0.0000 E E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E E 2.2000e- E 2.2000e- E 0.0000 E E 2.3000e- .. 005 004 004 004 004 ................................................d..................n................b..................i..................i.................n..................i..................6.................d...................i..................5.................b..................i..................n..................i.................. Unmitigated EE 1.00000- E 0.0000 : 1.00000-E 0.0000 E E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E E 2.2000e- : 2.2000e- E 0.0000 E E 2.3000e- 005 004 004 004 004 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated LROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory b/day Ib/day Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating ..............................a................... ..................i................. .................i.............. .......... ........... .......... .......... ........... Consumer 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products ..............................W.................. ..................4................9..................1..................1.................4..................1..................0.................9.....................................P.................P..................1.................. P..................1.................. Landscaping :: 1.0000e- 0.0000 : 1.0000e-: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : 2.2000e- : 2.2000e- : 0.0000 2.3000e- .. 005 004 004 004 004 Total 1.000Oe- 0.0000 1.000Oe-. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.2000e 2.2000e- . 0.0000 2.3000e. 005 004 004 004 004 Mitigated ROG I NOx CO SO2 Fugitive ExhaustPM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 : : 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 : i 0.0000 Coating ................................................d..................n................b..................i..................i... . .......... ........... .......... .......... ........... .......r.... ....a. ......a.... Consumer 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products ............1..0..00Oe-.. ...7:.... ..... .. .............i.1....0.. .00Oe-.. ......;i....0....0...0.00.......i..._._..........E.................:...................F.................. ................. ...................i..................:..................:.;..................i..................:...................i.................. Landscapi . 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000:. .: : 2.2000e- 2.2000e- : 0.0000 ng : i 2.3000e- 005 004 004 004 004 Total 1.0000e. 0.0000 1.0000e. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.2000e- 2.2000e- 0.0000 2.3000e- 005 004 004 004 004 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Off road Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation 2T� CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 5/11/2016 1:22 PM Coyote Canyon Landfill Tower Demolition and Replacement Project Orange County, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population User Defined Industrial 1.00 User Defined Unit 0.00 0.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq(Days) 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2017 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 630.89 CH4 Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use- Project includes construction of a cellular antenna tower. Construction Phase-Schedule per project plans Off-road Equipment- Equipment list per project plans. Off-road Equipment- Equipment per project plans. Off-road Equipment- Equipment list per project plans. Off-road Equipment- Equipment list per project plans. Demolition - Trips and VMT- Estimated delivery truck numbers for tower construction from project description. Consumer Products- No operational emissions. Landscape Equipment- No operational emissions. 272 Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation ' Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 0.00 79.00 PhaseEndDate 2/18/2017 11/30/2017 PhaseStartDate 1/1/2017 11/5/2016 PhaseStartDate 1214/2016 9/1512017 OffRoadEquipmentType Cranes r Excavators quipment OffRoadEquipmentType Crushing/Proc. Equipment OffRoadEquipmentType Plate Compactors Trenchers quipment quipment quipment ype Other Material Handling Equipment ujpm��i OffRoadEquipmentType Other Material Handling OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 Operationaffear 2014 2017 VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 VendarTripNumber 0.00 4.00 2.QEmissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM25 PM2.5 Total Year tons/yr MT/yr 2016 0.2103 2.0528 i 1.3373 i 2.3200e- i 0.1118 i 0.1155 i 0.2273 i 0.0192 i 0.1088 i 0.1280 i 0.0000 : 210.3242: 210.3242 i 0.0430 i 0.0000 i 211.2266 003 2017 i . i .9302 i 0.6304 i 8.9000e- i 8.1000e- i .0....0..5..8..9....ii....0....0...5.9...7....oi..2....3..0..0..0..e..-...ii....0....0..5..4..2.....ii.....0....0..5..4..4......ii....00000 .i...8 ..6 .8..i 82.6618 ii....0..024............ ........ xii... 00938 . 0004 ...ii....0....0..0..0..0.....oi...8..3....1..7..7..6.. 004 004 Total 0.3041 2.9830 1.9677 3.2100e. 0.1126 0.1744 0.2870 0.0195 0.1630 0.1824 0.0000 292.9859 292.9859 . 0.0675 0.0000 294.4042 003 Mitigated Construction ROG I NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year tons/yr MT/yr 2016 i 0.2103 i 2.0528 i 1.3373 i 2.3200e- i 0.0554 i 0.1155 i 0.1709 i 0.0107 i 0.1088 i 0.1194 i 0.0000 i 210.3240 i 210.3240 i 0.0430 i 0.0000 i 211.2264 003 ...............................io..................:. . .......i.................i....... ........o.................i.................i..................o..................i..................i....................i..................i..................i...................i..................i..................o................. 2017 E 0.0938 E 0.9302 E 0.6304 E 8,9000e- E 8.1000e- E 0.0589 E 0.0597 E 2.3000e- E 0.0542 E 0.0544 E 0.0000 E 82.6617 E 82.6617 E 0.0246 E 0.0000 E 83.1775 004 004 004 Total 0.3041 2.9830 1.9677 3.2100e- 0.0563 0.1744 0.2306 0.0109 0.1630 0.1739 0.0000 292.9856 292.9856 . 0.0675 0.0000 294.4039 003 ROG NOx CO SO2 I Fugitive Exhaust I PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.06 0.00 19.65 43.91 0.00 4.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational 220 ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I FugitiveIx Exhaust Fugitive Exhaust .5 Bio- io- Total CO2 CH4 Ole PM10 PIV Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Area ii .. 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 1.0000e-i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 2.0000e- i 2.00OOe- i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 3.0000e- .. 005 005 005 005 ..............................W..................i...................i. . ...... ... . .......... .......... .. ......i.... .._i ......e.... ........... Energy ii 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 .. ..........M.obile.......... ........................ ................. ................. ................. ................. ................. ................. .................. .................. ........................................................ ................. .................. ................. ............ 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .. ..............................m........................................................ ................. ......................0.................0............ .......................0...................0........................................................0............ .......................0............ ................. Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. ...................i...................i................. .................�.................i... . .......... Water i 0.0000 i 0.0000 e e 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 a 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.0000 1 0.0000 . 1.000 a-. 0.0000 . 0.0000 . 0.0000 . 0.0000 . 0.0000 . 0.0000 1 0.0000 . 0.0000 . 2.0000e• I 2.0000e. . 0.0000 . 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 005 oos oos Mitigated Operational ROG NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N2O I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total category tons/yr MT/yr Area EE 0.0000 i 0.0000 E 1.00OOe-E 0.0000 E E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 2.00OOe- E 2.00OOe- E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 3.0000e- 005 005 005 005 .......... En.er..............d'n......................................i.................i................g...................... ..... ................a.............. ...... ..................................... gy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 E 0.0000 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 .. ..............................m...0..................0.............v..0............a...0............a...0.................0............v...0............a...0......................................0.............:..................i..................:....0............a...0.............r....0............a................. Mobile 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .. .............................._........................................................_........................................0.................0............_.......................0...................0........................................................0............_....................................._................. Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ...............................'...................i...................E........................................................i..............E. .......... Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 I 0.0000 1.00OOe• 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 2.00OOe- I 2.00OOe• I 0.0000 I 0.0000 3.000Oe- 005 005 005 005 ROG NOx CO I SO2 I Fugitive Exhaust I PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM70 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total ��2 Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 :Demolition :Demolition :10/1/2016 :12/31/2016 6; 79: .................._:..............................................................e.....................................................................................i.....................................................i.....................e................................................................ 2 :Temporary tower construction :Trenching :11/5/2016 :12/3/2016 6: 25: t..............................................................a................ ...... ..... ..... ......... .... ..................................................... ......... a ........................................................ 3 'Permanent tower construction :Building Construction :9/15/2017 :11/30/2017 6: 66: Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0 (Architectural Coating—sgft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Permanent tower construction :Cranes 1: 4.00: 226: 0.2 i..................................................................5..........................................b................................i.................................:.................................... Permanent tower construction ::Forklifts 2: 6.00: 89: 0.20 ............i..............................................................._.;._._._._._._._._._._._._._...b.._._.........................:.................................:.................................... Demolition !Concrete/Industrial Saws 1: 8.00: 81: 0.73 i...............................................................-.;._._._._._._._._._._._._._...b..-.-.........................:.................................:.................................... Permanent tower construction :Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2: 8.00: 97: 0.3 .........................................................................i..................................................................a..........................................>................................i.................................:.................................... Demolition :Cranes 2: 8.00: 226: 0.2 i..................................................................f..........................................'................................i.............._._..............:.............................. Demolition :Excavators : 2i' 8.00: 162: 0.38 ..........................................................................i..................................................................d..........................................a................................i.................................:.................................... Demolition :Crushing/Prot.Equipment 1: 8.00: 85: 0.78 .........................................................................i..................................................................d..........................................a................................i.................................:.................................... Demolition :Plate Compactors 1: 8.00: 8: 0.43 ..........................................................................€.................................................................. ..........................................a................................:.................................;.................................... Temporary tower construct'i'on :Trenchers 1: 8.00: 80: 0.50 ..........................................................................€.................................................................. ........................................0 ................................:...................................................................... Demolition :Rubber Tired Dozers 0: 1.00: 255: 0.40 ..........................................................................:..............................................................................................................:.................................[.................................;.................................... Temporary tower construction TractorslLoaders/Backhoes 2 8.00: 97: 0.37 ..........................................................................:..............................................................................................................:.................................t.................................;.................................... Temporary tower construction :Other Material Handling Equipment': 2. 8.00: 167: 0.40 ;,r�; Fr��i io-n 'Other Material Handling Equipment' 8.002 1672 0.40 Trips and VMT Phase Name Tffroad�Equipment Worker Trip I Vendor Trip lHauling Trip Worker Trip VendorTrip Hauling-Frip WorkerVehicle I Vendor Hauling I Count I Number I Number I Nu I I Long I I Class Vehicle ClassiVehicle Class nemolition 9: 2:3.uo: 0.00: 854.002 14.702 6.90: 20.00:LU Mix Temporary tower 52 13.002 4.002 0.002 14.702 6.902 20.00ILD-Mix 1HDT Mix :HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed onUnpaved Roads Clean Paved Roads 3.2Demolition ^ 281G Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 INBio-CO2 Total CO2 I CH4 I N20 CO2e Category tonslyr I MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0924 0.0000 0.0924 O�0140 0.0000 0.0140 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 O�9836 1.59OOe- O�0943 0.0943 0.0893 0.0893 0o000 : 145.1089: 145A089 0.0347 0.0000 145.8379 0.1681 1.6233 003 Total 0.1681 1.6233 0.9836 1.5900e- 0.0924 0.0943 0.1867 0.0140 0.0893 0.1033 0.0000 145.1089 145.1089 0.0347 U0 1 003 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 22S ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 INBia-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PIVID I PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I I Category tonslyr MT/yr Hauling E IN 0.0951 3.10OOe- 7.32OOe- i 1.7700e- 9.09OOe- 2.01OOe- I A100-- 3 64nne- 28.6884 2.10OOe- 0.0000 28.6927 N 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 004 ..........W�Z�..............6:666b.... 6:6656... ....................................................&..................................................... .....................................4.................4................. ....................................4.................................... N 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ..........W;�KW......... .....................................S............................................................................................................ ....................................................... ................. .......................................................................... 3.10OOe- 4.60OOe- 0.0480 1.20OOe- 9.97OOe- 7.00OOe- 0.0100 2.65OOe- 7.00OOe- 2.71 OOe- 0,0000 8.9897 8.9897 4.40OOe- 0.0000 8.9990 N 003 003 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 Total 0.0113 0.1284 0.1431 4.3000e. 0.0173 1.8400e- 0.0191 4.66OOe- 1.7000e. 6.3500e. 0.0000 37.6781 37.6781 6.5000e. 0.0000 37.6916 1 004 003 003 003 003 004 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 F.gfi=. E.haust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 INBio-CO21 Total CO2 I CH4 N20 I CO2e PMIO PM10 ToLal PM2.5 PM2.5 Tote Category tonslyr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0361 0.0000 0.0361 5.4600e- 0.0000 5.46OOe- 0.0000'. 0.0000 1.1000 0.00oo 0.0000 TOM 003 003 ......................................................................................................... .....................................a.................................... a- 0.0943 0.0943 0.0893 0.0893 145.1087 0.0347 0.0000 145.8377 003 0.1681 1.6233 0.9836 1.5-300e- 0.0361 0.0943 0.1303 5.4600e- 0.0893 0.0947 0.0000 145.1087 145.1087 0.0347 0.0000 003 003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 otal CO2 CH4 N2 PMIO PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr ..........Hng..........5... 815..0.0........................._......................................................._......................................................._......................................_..................................._....................................._.......................... 0.1238 0.0951 3.1000e- 7.3200e- 1.7700e- 9.09OOe- 2.0100e- 1.6300e- 3.6400e- 0.0000 28.6884 28.6884 2.1000e- 0.0000 28697. .. .. 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 004 ...............................::.........................................................i....................................................... 0.0 0 . :... .. ......................................... Vendor ii 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 - .. ...................................3..................4...................0..................................9.................7..................0................2.................7..................2....................0.................8............................................................................8............ Worker i 3.10000- i 4.60000- 0.0480 i 1.20000- i 9.97000- 7.00000-i 0.0100 i 2.65000- i 7.00000- i 2.71000- i 0.0000 i 8.9897 8.9897 i 4.40000- 0.0000 8.9990 003 003 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 Total 0.0113 0.1284 0.1431 4.3000e. 0.0173 1.8400e- 0.0191 4.6600e. 1.7000e. 6.3500e. 0.0000 37.6781 37.6781 6.5000e. 0.0000 37.6916 004 003 003 003 003 004 3.3 Temporary tower construction - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO I SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM70 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road :: 0.0299 0.2957 0.1962 2.6000e- : 0.0193 0.0193 0.0177 0.0177 0.0000 i 24.9491 24.9491 7.53000- : 0.0000 25.1071 004 003 Total 0.0299 0.2957 . 0.1962 j 2.6000e. j . 0.0193 j 0.0193 j j 0.0177 j 0.0177 j 0.0000 j 24.9491 . 24.9491 j 7.5300e. . 0.0000 . 25.1071 004 003 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling EE 0.0000 E 0.0000 F 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 F 0.0000 E 0.0000 .. ..........V.....d............. . .................... .................................... ............_>. ................. ..............r.. ..............o- ..................................... ................ ............e... ...................................................... ......... ... enor ...................... 4.5100e- 5.90000- 1.00000- 3.10000- 7.00000- 3.80000- 9.00000- 6.00000- 1.50000- 0.0000 0.9802 0.9802 1.00000- 0.0000 0.9803 004 003 003 005 004 005 004 005 005 004 005 ...............................Ei...................i..................d.................i..................i..................i..................i..................E..................d..................i...................i..................d.................e..................:..................d..................E.................. Worker :: 5.6000e- : 8.2000e- :8.5800e-:: 2.000Oe- : 1.7800e- : 1.000Oe- : 1.8000e- : 4.7000e- : 1.000Oe- : 4.9000e- 0.0000 1.6080 1.6080 : 8.000Oe- : 0.0000 1.6096 .. 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 1.0300e. 5.3300e. 0.0145 3.0000e. 2.0900e- 8.0000e- 2.1800e- 5.6000e- 7.000Oe- 6.4000e- 0.0000 2.5881 2.5881 9.0000e. 0.0000 2.5899 003 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On-Site mm ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road :: 0.0299 0.2957 0.1962 1 2.6000.- : 0.0193 0.0193 0.0177 0.0177 0.0000 : 24.949 24.9491 7.5300.- : 0.0000 25.1071 004 003 Total 0.0299 i 0.2957 I 0.1962 j 2.B000e- j I 0.0193 j 0.0193 11.0177 0.0177 0.0000 24.9491 24.9491 7.5300e- 0.0000 25.1071 004 003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ii 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 f 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 .. ..........V.endor.........nFE.. ..............•r.. ..............o.......................................................o. ................. ..............n. ..............o. ..............r...................o... ............o... ............o... ...............................o..................r.... ............ 4.7000.- 4.5100.- 5.9000.-E 1.0000.- 3.1000.- 7.0000.- 3.8000.- 9.0000.- 6.0000.- 1.8000.- 0.0000 0.9802 0.9802 1.0000.- 0.0000 0.9803 004 003 003 005 004 005 004 005 005 004 005 ...............................:i...................i..................d.................i..................i..................6.................i..................i..................5..................i...................b.................d.................e..................i..................3..................i.................. Worker FE 5.6000.- E 8.2000e- E 8.5800.-E 2.000Oe- E 1.7800e- E 1.0000e- E 1.8000e- E 4.7000e- E 1.0000e- : 4.9000.- E 0.0000 E 1.6080 E 1.6080 E 8.000Oe- F 0.0000 E 1.6096 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 1.0300e- 5.3300e- 0.0145 3.000Oe- 2.0900e- 8.000Oe- 2.1800e- 5.6000e- 7.0000®- 6.4000e- 0.0000 2.5881 2.5881 9.0000.- 0.0000 2.5899 003 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 3.4 Permanent tower construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 220 ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road ii 0.0927 i 0.9194 i 0.6157 i 8.6000e- i i 0.0588 i 0.0588 i i 0.0541 i 0.0541 i 0.0000 i 80.1162 a 80.1162 i 0.0246 i 0.0000 i 80.6317 .. 004 Total 0.0927 0.9194 0.6157 8.6000e- 0.0588 0.0588 0.0541 0.0541 0.0000 80.1162 80.1162 0.0246 0.0000 80.6317 004 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO SO2 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 Total CO2 I CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling :: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ............................... . ................:.................. .................:..... ... : ....: ... : ... : ..... ... : ... .... Vendor `.'. 1.1400e- ; 0.0108 0.0147 ; 3.000Oe- ; 8.1000e- ; 1.6000e- ; 9.7000e- ; 2.3000e- ; 1.5000e- ; 3.8000e- ; 0.0000 ; 2:5455 2.5455 ; 2.0000e- 0.0000 2.5459 .. 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 004 005 ...........::......................................:....................................................... :.. Worker ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.1400e- 0.0108 0.0147 3.0000e- 8.1000e- . 1.6000e- 9.7000e- 2.3000e- 1.5000e. 3.8000e. 0.0000 2.5455 2.5455 2.0000e- . 0.0000 2.5459 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 004 005 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG I NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road :: 0.0927 0.9194 0.6157 8.60000- : 0.0588 0.0588 0.0541 0.0541 0.0000 80.1162 : 80.1162 0.0246 0.0000 80.6316 004 ; F Total 0.0927 � 0.9194 1 0.6157 8.6000e- 0.0598 0.0588 0.0541 0.0541 1 0.0000 80.1162 1 80.1162 0,0246 0.0000 80.6316 1 004 Mitigated Construction Off-Site LROG NOx CO 502 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO21 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00rn n crop n nnon E 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .......... ......... ....................................... ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Vendor '` 1.14000- 0.0108 0.0147 3.000Oe- 8.1000e- 1.6000e- 9.7000e- 2.3000e- 1.5000e- 3.8000e- 0.0000 2.5455 2.5455 2.000Oe- 0.0000 2.5459 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 004 005 ..........W.. ......... .................................... ....6.66W .................. 0�'r..........::......0...0"0"0"0.....::......0...0,0"0"0" ....0...0'0"0"'0....::......0"0"0"0"0'.....::.....0'.'0"0"0"0'.....::.....0...0,000,....::.....0""0"0"0...0.....::.....0...0,0"0"0,....-::""o...0000.....::......0.0000......::....0.0000..."""""-::....0...0,000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.1400e. 0.0108 0.0147 3.0000e. 8.1000e- 1.6000e- 9.7000e- 2.3000e. 1.5000e. 3.8000e. 0.0000 2.5455 2.5455 2.0000e. 0.0000 2.5459 1 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 004 005 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO21 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated EE 0.0000 E 0.0000 F 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0,0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 F 0.0000 E 0.0000 ............................................................................................................. ........................................................ ............................................................................................ nm@'9' :66 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 f 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 E 0.0000 E 0.0000 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT User Defined Industrial 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip% Trip Purpose% Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-CH-O or C-NW H-W or C- H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by User Defined Industrial 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH 0.510449: 0.057012: 0.191854 0.151889: 0.041459: 0.005887: 0.015572: 0.014818: 0.001440: 0.002145: 0.004716: 0.000509: 0.002251 5.0 Energy Detail 4.4 Fleet Mix Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Mitigated:: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ...............................:i...................i......................................i..................i.....................................i.................. ........... ElecGicity = 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated ...............................ii. . .......i..................i.................i... .......... ........... . .......:.... ...... .......: . NaturalGas ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated ..............................Si.................,.i,.....,..........5.,............._L,... _._._.. _._._... NaturalGas ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 � 0.0000 ; ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 ; 0.0000 F 0.0000 0.0000 F 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated �g9 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Neo I CO2e a Use PM10 PM 10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr tans/yr MT/yr User Defined 0 s 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : s 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 Industrial Total . 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated NaturalGa ROG I NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive ExhaustEPM2.5Bio- 2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr User Defined 0 :: 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 77=000 Industrial Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 - 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated �9 L) Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 I N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr User Defined i 0 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Industrial Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Use Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr User Defined 0 :: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Industrial Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NB10-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated .00000-: 0.0000 ; ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 2.00OOe- ; 2.00OOe- : 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 3.0000e- 005 005 005 005 �92 .....w.................................. ................_......................................................._............................................................................................................................................... ii 0.0000 0.0000 1.00008- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.00008- 2.00008- 0.0000 0.0000...7i.3000Oe. 005 005 005 005 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated mom ERONOx CO ugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugifive Exhaust Bio- io- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM70 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural ?E 0.0000 i 0.0000 : 0.0000 e e 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 a 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Coating ..............................W.....................................I.................P....................................t.................1 .......... ..................9.... ....t......................0............1.................1.................1....0...........9.................1..................4................. Consumer :: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 p 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products ..............................db..................i...................i.................b.................y..................i.................i..................d......_._._....i..................i....................i..................i..................i..................d..................i.................. o................. Landscaping 0.0000 0.0000 : 1.00008-: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : 2.0000e- : 2.00008- : 0.0000 0.0000 3.00008- .. 005 005 005 005 Total 0.0000 0.0000 1.00008-. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- . 0.0000 0.0000 3.00008- 005 005 005 005 Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5Bio-0O2 io- oto CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM 10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory I tons/yr MT/yr Architectural ii 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i O.D000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Coating ........J:...................i........................._._.......c.........................._...... .......... Consumer :: 0.0000 0.0000 0-0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products .............................. ...................i...................i..................... . .......... .......... ..................i...................................... ... ................................................ Landscaping � 0.0000 0.0000 1.00008-; 0.0000 ' ' 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 ' 2.00008- 2.00008- 0.0000 ' 0.6666"'1' 005 005 005 Total 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e-. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e- 2.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0000 3.Ooo0e- 005 005 005 005 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water [Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated :; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................W......000.........0....i...................i.................�................. Unmitigated ;; 00.0000 D.0000 i 0.0000 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Ou Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e door Use Land Use Mgal Myr User Defined 0/0 :: 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 Industrial Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Indoor/Outi Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e door Use 2J°3 Land Use Mgal= MT/yr User Defined 0/0 :{ 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 : 0.0000 Industrial Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Year Total CO2 CH4 I N2O CO2e MT/yr Mitigated ;; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 Unmitigated.......... iti..............oi................_6.. ............_{...0. ....r gated ii 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000000 0.0000 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Disposed Land Use tons MT/yr User Defined 0 :: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Industrial �9 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons MT/yr User Defined 0.0000 0.0000 0.'00000 0000 Industrial Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation 295 L C LSA ASSOCIATES INC. FRESNO RIVERSIDE J 20 EXECUTIVE PARK, SUITE 200 949.553.0666 TEL BERKELEY PALM SPRINGS AOCKLIN IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614 949.553.8076 FAX CARLSBAD PT. RICHMOND SAN LUIS OBISPO MEMORANDUM DATE, May 23,2016 To: Romi Archer,Associate,LSA Associates Inc. Enom. J.T. Stephens,LSA Associates,Inc, SOE3ECIn Construction Noise Impact Analysis Memorandum for the Demolition of Structures and Construction of Temporary and Permanent Wireless Telecommunication Facilities at the Closed Coyote Canyon Landfill Gas-To-Energy Facility Site INTRODUCTION This Construction Noise Impact Analysis has been prepared to evaluate the potential noise impacts and abatement measures associated with the construction of the Demolition of Structures and Construction of Temporary and Permanent Wireless Telecommunication Facilities at the Closed Coyote Canyon Landfill Gas-To-Energy Facility Site(proposed project)in the City of Newport Beach(City), California.This report examines the impacts on off-site noise-sensitive uses and evaluates the construction noise abatement measures incorporated as part of the project's California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) review. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The proposed project consists of three components, all of which will occur at the landfill gas-to- energy facility site(project site). These components are the demolition of landfill gas-to-energy facility structures, the construction and operation of temporary wireless communication facilities, and the construction and operation of permanent wireless communication facilities. The project site is shown in Figure 1 (Attachment A). The first component that will occur will be the on-site demolition of most of the existing structures. Some of the existing structures will remain, including three existing landfill gas flares that will continue to flare landfill gas, structures needed to support the landfill gas collection system infrastructure, and existing electrical, water, sewer, and natural gas and landfill gas lines. In addition, the paved access road to the project site as well as the perimeter wall and the tall trees surrounding the perimeter wall will all remain.The most significant structure that will be demolished is an existing 105-foot(ft)high exhaust stack that is no longer in operation.This structure is highly visible in the Newport Coast and also houses cellular network apparatus that will need to be replaced with temporary apparatus and later(once demolition activities are complete) with permanent replacement apparatus. 5/23/16 nPAGE01001ENoise\Noise Memo Constmotion.dom, 290 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Demolition Demolition activities are anticipated to begin in October 2016 and shall be completed by December 31, 2016. Demolition activities are anticipated to occur Monday through Saturday, from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. or sundown. Heavy equipment that will be utilized during the demolition effort include the following: a 270-ton crane for the removal of the turbine and generator; a 170-ton crane with 150 ft of boom for the removal of the 105 ft tall exhaust stack; a Komatsu 650 excavator with an Allied G130 concrete hammer; a 350 Link belt excavator with a G90 concrete hammer and a Labounty MDP 27 universal processor; a 966 Cat rubber-tired loader; skidsteer loaders; water trucks; an 18-wheel semi-end dump trucks; and a vibratory sheep's foot compactor. Two large excavators with universal processors (i.e., a grabbing attachment on the excavators used for precise demolition work) will be used for tearing apart the existing structures. Jackhammering will be required to tear apart the concrete pad at the site, and concrete breakers will then be used for crushing the demolished concrete.The demolished concrete will then be removed off site and taken to a recycling facility. The voids left by the removal of the concrete pad will be backfilled with clean, compacted soil to 90 percent of maximum density and quality assured. There are certain structures at the gas-to-energy facility that will be sold by the demolition contractor to other gas-to-energy facility operators or for other similar facilities. These structures include the gas turbines,boilers, and other structures.These structures will be removed from the site and transported to their end-use destinations. Other structures will be dismantled using the two large excavators,with the dismantled materials sorted by material type.Materials will then transported off site for recycling (i.e., metals and concrete). For the demolition of the 105 ft tall exhaust stack, a 170-ton crane with 150 ft of boom will be used to lift off sections of the stack that will be lowered to the ground, where the universal processors can size the material for trucking and proper off-site disposal. The stack will have some preliminary cuts performed by men on man-lifts, with the crane moved in and attached prior to finalizing the cuts, and the section lifted off and lowered to the ground. The process will continue until the stack is accessible from ground level.It is anticipated that it will take no more than 2 days to remove this exhaust stack, and the crane will not remain in the air for more than a few hours at a time. It is estimated that the demolition will generate approximately 8,640 tons of demolished concrete and that each truck will be able to haul 18 tons per load. Therefore, the demolition will generate approximately 480 two-way vehicle trips that will be distributed over a 3-month period. Assuming 25 workdays per month and a 3-month demolition schedule,the demolition component would generate approximately 7 two-way demolished concrete truck trips per day. For the estimated 14,360 square feet (sf)of structures that will be demolished, it is estimated this will generate approximately 4 two- way truck trips per day over the 3-month demolition schedule. The demolition component would also generate approximately 30 two-way employee and material delivery trips per day. It is estimated that the highest number of daily trips generated by the project is 75, assuming the overlapping of demolition and construction.The work area is limited in space, and the access road is too narrow to 5/23/16 nPAGE01001EWoise\Noise Memo ConstmUion.dom q 2 2q7 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. provide parking. Therefore,the site is not large enough to generate a higher volume of daily trips due to its limited capacity. Metals will be transported to a recycling facility located in the City of Long Beach, and the demolished concrete will be transported to either the Ewles Materials recycling facility in the City of Irvine or a similar facility. Access from the project site to the Ewles Materials recycling facility (located at 16081 Construction Circle West in Irvine) will be from Newport Coast Drive, the State Route 73 (SR-73)Toll Road, State Route 55 (SR-55),Interstate 405 (I-405),Jamboree Road, Barranca Parkway, and Construction Circle West. Solid waste materials (e.g., insulation, aluminum, gypsum, sheet metal, and wood waste) will be disposed at the Frank R.Bowerman Landfill in Irvine, which is owned and operated by the County of Orange(County). Access from the project site to the Frank R.Bowerman Landfill(located at 11002 Bee Canyon Access Road,Irvine) will be from Newport Coast Drive,the SR-73 Toll Road, the State Route 133 (SR-133)Toll Road, Interstate 5 (1-5), Sand Canyon Avenue, and the Bee Canyon Access Road. The majority of the vehicle trips for demolition will be for the off-site demolished concrete removal. Construction The construction of the temporary wireless communication facilities will occur during Fortistar's demolition activities. Four existing antenna arrays that provide cell coverage to the Newport Coast area are currently attached to the existing 105 ft high exhaust stack.The four carriers that own these antenna arrays are Sprint,AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile.Prior to the demolition of the 105 ft high exhaust stack, all four carriers will need to construct temporary wireless communication facilities at the project site and then remove the existing antenna arrays from the 105 ft high exhaust stack. There will be two temporary wireless communication facilities,each of which will be 60 feet tall. Both of the 60 ft tall temporary wireless communication facilities will have two antenna arrays attached, one located approximately 50 feet and the other approximately 55 feet from the ground surface. Currently,existing power units located on the project site provide power to their existing antenna arrays and will continue to provide power for both the proposed temporary and permanent wireless communication facilities at the project site. One will need to be replaced and a new power supply will be installed that will support both the temporary and permanent wireless communication facilities. Construction of the temporary wireless communication facilities will take approximately 5 weeks before they are operational and can begin to provide cellular coverage. The temporary wireless communication facilities will only be on the project site until the permanent wireless communication facilities are constructed and operational, which will occur in the fall of 2017 and after the migratory bird nesting season, which is from February 15 to September 15. Construction of the temporary wireless communication facilities will include equipment staging for approximately 1 week; delivery of the flower pot structure using a crane and semi-truck over 3 days; trenching and conduit installation from the perimeter wall to the flower pot structure using a drill rig and backhoe over 3 days; microwave dish installation and alignment with a boom truck(i.e., crane truck) over 1 day; and cable installation and antenna relocation to the flower pot over a 3-day period, which will include the decommissioning of existing antennas and other radiofrequency material from the 105 ft high exhaust stack and requiring the use of a boom truck. 5/23/16 nP:\GE01001E\Noise\Noise Memo Constmotion.dom, 3 292 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Construction and Operation of Permanent Wireless Communication Facilities. Once the two temporary wireless communication facilities are operational, and after all demolition activities are complete,the four carriers will begin work on the construction of the permanent wireless communication facilities in the fall of 2017, after the migratory bird nesting season (i.e.,February 15 to September 15). There will be two 60 ft tall permanent wireless communication facilities.It is anticipated that the permanent wireless communication facilities will take approximately 3 months to construct and will be operational by approximately November 2017, at which time the temporary cell towers will be removed from the project site. Construction of these permanent wireless communication facilities will include equipment staging for approximately 8 weeks; ground-ring trenching over a 3-day period using a drill rig and backhoe; inspection and installation of the foundation cage over 1 week using a boom truck;pouring of the foundation concrete with a cement truck and inspection over I week; curing time and tower delivery over 2 weeks; steel tower installation using a crane over 1 week; antenna relocations to the new towers (including dish alignment using a boom truck)over 1 week; and installation of the faux branches and inspection. METHODOLOGY Evaluation of the noise impacts associated with the proposed project includes the following: • Determining the noise impacts associated with short-term construction of the proposed project on adjacent noise-sensitive uses; • Determining the required abatement measures to reduce short-term construction noise and vibration impacts. This noise impact analysis utilizes the City's noise standards, including the City Noise Element and Municipal Code, as thresholds against which potential noise impacts are evaluated. LOCAL REGULATIONS City of Newport Beach Noise Standards General Plan.The California Government Code Section 65302(g)requires that a noise element be included in the General Plan of each county and city in the State. The Noise Element of the City of Newport Beach General Plan (2006)is intended to identify sources of noise and provide objectives and policies that ensure that noise from various sources does not create an unacceptable noise environment. Overall,the City's Noise Element describes the noise environment(including noise sources) in the City,addresses noise mitigation regulations, strategies, and programs,as well as delineating federal, State, and City jurisdiction relative to rail, automotive, aircraft, and nuisance noise. Construction-related noise impacts are discussed in Goal N-5, Minimized Excessive Construction Related Noise. Under Goal N-5,Policy N 5.1, Limiting Hours of Activity,requires that the limits on hours of construction activities be enforced. 5/23/16 nPAGE01001EWoise\Noise Memo ConstmUion.dom q4, 29 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Municipal Code. Section 10.28.040,Construction Activity—Noise Regulations,t states the following: A. Weekdays and Saturdays.No person shall, while engaged in construction, remodeling, digging, grading, demolition, painting,plastering or any other related building activity, operate any tool, equipment or machine in a manner which produces loud noise that disturbs,or could disturb, a person of normal sensitivity who works or resides in the vicinity, on any weekday except between the hours of seven a.m. and six-thirty p.m.,nor on any Saturday except between the hours of eight a.m. and six p.m. B. Sundays and Holidays.No person shall,while engaged in construction, remodeling, digging, grading, demolition, painting,plastering or any other related building activity, operate any tool, equipment or machine in a manner which produces loud noise that disturbs,or could disturb, a person of normal sensitivity who works or resides in the vicinity, on any Sunday or any federal holiday. FEDERAL REGULATIONS Federal Transit Administration Criteria Due to the lack of vibration standards developed for local jurisdictions, vibration standards included in Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment(FTA 2006) are used in this analysis for ground- borne vibration impacts, as shown in Table A. Table A: Construction Vibration Damage Criteria PPV Approximate Lv Building Category (in/see) (VdB)' Reinforced-concrete, steel or timber(noplaster) 0.50 102 Engineered concrete and mason (noplaster) 0.30 98 Non-engineered timber and masonry buildings 0.20 94 Buildings extremely susceptible to vibration dama e 0.12 90 Source: Transit Noise and Vibration IrnpactAssessment(FTA 2006). RMS vibration velocity in decibels(VdB)re 1 micro-inch/second. FTA=Federal Transit Administration RMS=root-mean-square in/sec=inches per second VdB=vibration velocity decibels PPV=peak particle velocity The criteria for environmental impact from ground-bome vibration and noise are based on the maximum levels for a single event. Table B lists the potential vibration damage criteria associated with construction activities, as suggested in the Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (FTA 2006). FTA guidelines show that a vibration level of up to 102 VdB (an equivalent to 0.5 inch per second [in/sec] in PPV) (FFA 2006) is considered safe for buildings consisting of reinforced City of Newport Beach.Municipal Code,Noise Ordinance. Website:http://www.codepublishing.com/CA/ NewportBeach/htmi/NewportBeachl0/NewportBeach1028.html#10.28.040,accessed May 2016. 5/23/16 nPAGE01001ENoise\Noise Memo Constmction.dom, 5 3©D LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Table B: Guideline Vibration Potential Threshold Criteria Maximum PPV(in/sec) Continuous/Frequent Structure and Condition Transient Sources' Intermittent Sources' Extremely fragile historic buildings,mins,ancient monuments 0.12 0.08 Fragile buildings 0.20 0.10 Historic and some old buildings 0.50 0.25 Older residential structures 0.50 0.30 New residential structures 1.00 0.50 Modem industrial/commercial buildings 2.00 0.50 Source: Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual(Caltrans 2013). 1 Transient sources create a single,isolated vibration event,such as blasting or drop balls. 2 Continuous/frequent intermittent sources include impact pile drivers,pogo-stick compactors,crack-and-seat equipment, vibratory pile drivers,and vibratory compaction equipment. Caltrans=California Department of Transportation in/sec=inches per second PPV=peak particle velocity concrete, steel, or timber(no plaster), and would not result in any construction vibration damage. For a nonengineered timber and masonry building,the construction vibration damage criterion is 94 VdB (0.2 inch/sec in PPV). The PPV values for building damage thresholds referenced above are also shown in Table B,taken from the Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual (Caltrans 2013), which included additional building definition and vibration building damage thresholds. Table C illustrates the human response to various vibration levels, as described in the Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment(FTA 2006). Table C: Human Response to Different Levels of Ground-Borne Noise and Vibration Vibration Noise Level Velocity Level Low Freq' Mid Freq' Human Response 65 VdB 25 dBA 40 dBA Approximate threshold of perception for many humans.Low- frequency sound usually inaudible;mid-frequency sound excessive for quiet sleeping areas. 75 VdB 35 dBA 50 dBA Approximate dividing line between barely perceptible and distinctly perceptible.Many people find transit vibration at this level unacceptable.Low-frequency noise acceptable for sleeping areas mid- frequency noise annoying in most quiet occupied areas. 85 VdB 45 dBA 60 dBA Vibration acceptable only if there are an infrequent number of events per day.Low-frequency noise unacceptable for sleeping areas;mid- frequency noiseunacceptable even for infrequent events with institutional land uses,such as schools and churches. Source:Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment(FTA 2006). 1 Approximate noise level when vibration spectrum peak is near 30 Hz. Approximate noise level when vibration spectrum peak is near 60 Hz. dBA=A-weighted decibels Hz=Hertz Freq=Frequency VdB=vibration velocity decibels 5/23/16 nP:\GE01001E\Noise\Noise Memo Constmction.doex,, 6 301 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Thresholds of Significance A project will normally have a significant effect on the environment related to noise if it will substantially increase the ambient noise levels for adjoining areas or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community in which it is located. The applicable noise standards governing the project site are the criteria in the City's Noise Element of the General Plan and its Municipal Code. EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing Noise Environment The project site is located approximately 930 ft west of SR-73, 915 ft east of Newport Coast Drive, 1,575 ft south of Sage Hill High School, and 1,300 ft north of single-family residences to the south. The noise levels at the project site are dominated by traffic on SR-73 and Newport Coast Drive. Based on calculations completed in Attachment B utilizing 2014 California Department of Transportation(Caltrans) Data Branch information and the Federal Highway Administration(FHWA) Traffic Noise Model,the 60 A-weighted decibel(dBA) Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) contour is located approximately 940 ft to the west of the SR-73 centerline. PROJECT CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS Short-Term Construction-Related Noise Impacts Short-term construction-related noise impacts would be associated with the demolition of existing structures on site and the construction of temporary and permanent wireless communication facilities for the proposed project. Construction-related short-term noise levels would be higher than existing ambient noise levels in the project area today, but would no longer occur once construction of the project is completed. Two types of short-term noise impacts could occur during construction of the proposed project. First, construction crew commutes and the transport of construction equipment and materials to the site for the proposed project would incrementally increase noise levels on access roads leading to the site. Truck pass-bys have the potential to cause an intermittent noise increase,generally assumed to be 75 dBA maximum instantaneous noise level (Lmax) at 50 ft. As stated above in the project description, access from the project site to the off-site areas of disposal will be generally along major roadways including Newport Coast Drive, SR-73 Toll Road, SR-133 Toll Road,I-5, Sand Canyon Avenue, and Jamboree Road. Assuming a total of 75 truck trips per day based on a conservative estimate, the increase in volume will be minimal as compared to daily traffic volumes along the respective roadways and associated traffic noise level increases; therefore, short-term construction- related impacts associated with worker commute and equipment transport to the project site would be less than significant. The second type of short-term noise impact is related to noise generated during demolition and construction of the temporary and new facilities on site. Construction is completed in discrete steps, each of which has its own mix of equipment, and consequently its own noise characteristics.The following is a list of equipment expected to be used: 5/23/16 nPAGE01001EWoise\Noise Memo Constmotion.dom, 7 302 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. • 270-ton crane for the removal of the turbine and generator • 170-ton crane with 150 ft of boom for the removal of the 105 ft tall exhaust stack • Komatsu 650 excavator with an Allied G130 concrete hammer • 350 Link belt excavator with a G90 concrete hammer and a Labounty MDP 27 universal processor • 966 Cat rubber-tired loader • Skidsteer loaders • Water trucks • 18-wheel semi-end dump trucks • Vibratory sheep's foot compactor Based on a description of the stages provided in the project description,the loudest phase of construction is expected to occur when jackhammering and pneumatic tools are used to tear apart the concrete pad at the site. Utilizing the reference noise levels provided in Table D below, noise impacts during this phase of construction were calculated at the surrounding sensitive receptors. At a distance of 50 ft from activities,it is expected that noise levels may reach 89 dBA equivalent continuous sound level (Le9) as shown in Attachment C. Table D: Typical Maximum Construction Equipment Noise Levels(Ln,n,) Acoustical Suggested Maximum Sound Levels Type of Equipment Usa a Factor for Analysis(dBA Lm,x at 50 ft) Concrete/Industrial Saw 20 90 Crane 16 85 Excavator 40 85 Forklift 40 85 Generator 50 82 Grader 40 85 Jackhammer 20 89 Loader 40 80 Paver 50 85 Roller 20 85 Rubber Tire Dozer 40 85 Scraper 40 85 Tractor 40 84 Truck 40 84 Welder 40 73 Source:FHWA Highway Construction Noise Handbook(FHWA 2006). dBA=A-weighted decibels FHWA=Federal Highway Administration ft=feet Lm =maximum instantaneous noise level There are existing residences approximately 1,280 ft to the south of the project site and an existing high school (Sage Hill High School) located approximately 1,895 ft to the north of the project site as shown on Figure 2(Attachment A). Taking into account the distance from operations to the sensitive uses,noise level impacts are expected to be reduced by 28 dBA at the closest residences to the south 5/23/16 nP:\GE01001EWoise\Noise Memo ConstruUion.doex,, 8 303 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. and by 31 dBA at the high school to the north. The noise levels created from the loudest stage of construction are expected to reach 60.7 dBA Leg and 57.3 dBA Leg at the closest residences and school,respectively, which are comparable to the existing traffic noise levels from SR-73 as presented above. Compliance with the hours of operation required by the City's Municipal Code would result in noise impacts being less than significant. In addition to the required hours of operation,the following practices shall be implemented to reduce noise levels to the greatest extent feasible: • During all construction operations,the project contractors should equip all construction equipment,fixed or mobile,with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards. • The project contractor should place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the relatively more sensitive receptors nearest the project site. • The construction contractor should locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and relatively more noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. Vibration-Related Impact Analysis Vibration refers to ground-borne noise and perceptible motion. Ground-borne vibration is almost exclusively a concern inside buildings and is rarely perceived as a problem outdoors where the motion may be discernible. However, without the effects associated with the shaking of a building, there is less adverse reaction. Vibration energy propagates from a source through intervening soil and rock layers to the foundations of nearby buildings. The vibration then propagates from the foundation throughout the remainder of the structure. Building vibration may be perceived by occupants as the motion of building surfaces,the rattling of items on shelves or hanging on walls,or a low-frequency rumbling noise.The rumbling noise is caused by the vibrating walls,floors, and ceilings radiating sound waves.Building damage is not a factor for normal transportation projects,including rail projects,with the occasional exception of blasting and pile driving during construction.Annoyance from vibration often occurs when the vibration exceeds the threshold of perception by 10 decibels (dB)or less. This is an order of magnitude below the damage threshold for normal buildings. Typical sources of ground-borne vibration are construction activities (e.g.,blasting,pile driving, and operating heavy-duty earth-moving equipment), steel-wheeled trains, and occasional traffic on rough roads. Problems with ground-borne vibration and noise from these sources are usually localized to areas within approximately 100 ft from the vibration source, although there are examples of ground- borne vibration causing interference at distances greater than 200 ft (FI'A 2006).When roadways are smooth,vibration from traffic, even heavy trucks, is rarely perceptible. It is assumed for most projects that the roadway surface will be smooth enough that ground-borne vibration from street traffic will not exceed the impact criteria;however, construction of the project could result in ground-borne vibration that could be perceptible and annoying. Ground-borne noise is not likely to be a problem because noise arriving via the normal airborne path usually will be greater than ground-borne noise. Ground-borne vibration has the potential to disturb people as well as damage buildings. Although it is very rare for transportation-induced ground-borne vibration to cause even cosmetic building damage, it is not uncommon for construction processes such as blasting and pile driving to cause vibration of 5/23/16 nPAGE01001EWoise\Noise Memo Constmuion.dom, 9 30.4- LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. sufficient amplitudes to damage nearby buildings (FTA 2006). Ground-borne vibration is usually measured in terms of vibration velocity, either the root-mean-square (RMS) velocity or peak particle velocity (PPV). RMS is best for characterizing human response to building vibration, and PPV is used to characterize the potential for damage. Decibel notation acts to compress the range of numbers required to describe vibration. Vibration velocity level in decibels is defined as: L„=30 log Io [VN fl where L,is the velocity in decibels (VdB), "V"is the RMS velocity amplitude, and"Vrep"is the reference velocity amplitude, or I x 10-6 in/sec used in the United States. Ground-borne noise and vibration from construction activity would be generally low at the surrounding noise sensitive uses.Excavators and other heavy-tracked construction equipment generate approximately 87 VdB of ground-borne vibration when measured at 25 ft,based on the Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment(FTA 2006) shown in Table E. Taking into account the distance from operations to the sensitive uses,vibration impacts are expected to be reduced by 51 VdB at the closest residences to the south and by 56 VdB at the high school to the north. The vibration levels created from the heavy construction equipment are expected to reach 36 VdB and 31 VdB at the closest residences and school,respectively. These levels of ground-borne vibration are far below the threshold of human perception, which is approximately 65 VdB, and the construction vibration damage criterion of 90 VdB; therefore impacts associated with vibration from construction activities are less than significant and do not require mitigation. Table E: Vibration Source Amplitudes for Construction Equipment Reference PPV/Lv at 25 ft Equipment PPV(inch/see) Lv(VdB) Vibratory Roller 0.210 94 Hoe Ram 0.089 87 Large Bulldozer 0.089 87 Caisson Drilling 0.089 87 Loaded Trucks 0.076 86 Jackhammer 0.035 79 Small Bulldozer 1 0.003 1 58 11 Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment(FTA 2006). ft=feet PPV=peak particle velocity in/sec=inches per second VdB=vibration velocity decibels Lv=velocity in decibels REFERENCES California Department of Transportation. 2014. Annual Average Daily Truck Traffic on the California State Highway System. Website: http://www.dot.ca.gov/trafficops/ census/docs/2014_aadt_truck.pdf(accessed May 2016). September 2013. Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual.Website: http://www.dot.ca. og v/hq/env/noise/pub/TCVGM Sep13 FINAL.pdf, accessed May 2016. 5/23/16 nPAGE01001EWoise\Noise Memo Constmotion.dom, 10 30.E LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. City of Newport Beach. November 2006. General Plan,Noise Element.Website: http://www.newportbeachca.gov/PLN/General_Plan/13_Chl2_Noise_web.pdf,accessed May 2016. Municipal Code,Noise Ordinance. Website: http://www.codepublishing.com/CA/ NewportBeach/htmUNewportBeachl0/NewportBeach1028.htm1#10.28.040,accessed May 2016. Federal Highway Administration(FHWA). August 2006. FHWA Highway Construction Noise Handbook. Website: http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/34000/34300/34369/DOT-VNTSC-FHWA-06- 02Tpdf, accessed May 2016, Federal Highway Administration (FHA). 1977. Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model,FHWA RD-77-108. Federal Transit Administration (FTA). 2006. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. FTA-VA-90-1003-06. Website: https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/ FTA Noise and Vibration Manual.pdf, accessed May 2016. Attachments: A: Figures B: Existing Traffic Noise Calculations C: Construction Noise Calculations 5/23/16 nPAGE01001EWoise\Noise Memo Constmotion.dom, 11 300 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSTRUCTION NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM MAY 2016 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL TOWER DEMOLITION AND REPLACEMENT PROJECT CITY OF NEWPORT REACH, CALIFORNIA ATTACHMENT A FIGURES PdGE0100I E1Nois6Noise Memo Construction.docx,,05/23/16» 307 2. 9 `" �": I" .�"' - � ow• � .d a e Hyl uC'mo° _— ,78 rM fb'qv �'�•, •+t� rwt•garL - `.✓! \ RG1 �rdw.nm w.r air '.. gw i t .' �..- cn.,,,e^, y's �'+. ,""•. t 1°,, ,� 'A+"e, .,�, a „ry • n �yyE r I Y i JHca F d 6y. •,X,eY..O.. - ` � 4 E T j Q. J ♦4• c L'Im C. WASHES A �i �\■IIOr��L\� 261 Ns NEI In 241 Project Location 74 IN iii 1 • v •� v'.i •• � 4 £.Y � S Hil Hig I .. / r �i,�'�•��; ri. 111 .= { ,Re'sidVI.. . 5 r bing � i r r s i r I• � i i i �i a s • s s � LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSTRUCTION NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM MAY 2016 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL TOWER DEMOLITION AND REPLACEMENT PROJECT CITY OF NEWPORT REACH, CALIFORNIA ATTACHMENT B EXISTING TRAFFIC NOISE CALCULATIONS PdGE0100I E1Nois6Noise Memo Construction.docx,,05/23/16» 310 TABLE Existing-01 FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS RUN DATE: 05/19/2016 ROADWAY SEGMENT: SR-73 Freeway NOTES: Fashion Valley - Existing * * ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 67200 SPEED (MPH) : 65 GRADE : . 5 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DAY EVENING NIGHT --- ------- ----- AUTOS 76 . 70 12 . 77 9.49 M-TRUCKS 0 . 80 0 . 05 0 . 10 H-TRUCKS 0 . 08 0 . 00 0 . 01 ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT) : 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * * CNEL AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 76 . 94 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO CNEL 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL 55 CNEL ------- ------- ------- ------- 204 . 5 438 . 1 942 . 5 2029 .6 1 311 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSTRUCTION NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM MAY 2016 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL TOWER DEMOLITION AND REPLACEMENT PROJECT CITY OF NEWPORT REACH, CALIFORNIA ATTACHMENT C CONSTRUCTION NOISE CALCULATIONS PdGE0100I E1Nois6Noise Memo Construction.docx,,05/23/16» 312 Demolition Activities Noise Level Calculation Prior to Implementation of Noise Attenuation Requirements Distance to Reference(dBA) Usage Receptor Ground Shielding Calculated(dBA) No. E ut ment Description 50 It Lmax Quantic Factor' (1'1) Effect I (dBA) Lmax I Le Energy I Heol rmec 84 2 40 50 0.5 0 87.0 83.0 200950915 2 excaramr 85 2 4U 50 0.5 0 88.0 84.0 252982213 3 Iaonrammer 89 2 20 50 OS 0 92.0 85.0 317731294 Source:LSA,May 2016. Lmaxx 94 IA 89 i-Percentage of time that a piece of equipment is operating at full power. dBA—A-weighted Decibels Lon.-Maximo.Level Leq-Equivalent Level 313 V� QP �P �2� Attachment No. PC 4 Final MND and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 315 V� QP �P �2� FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Coyote Canyon Landfill Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update LEAD AGENCY: City of Newport Beach Community Development Department, Planning Division 100 Civic Center Drive PO Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658 (949) 644-3253 Contact: Benjamin M. Zdeba,AICP, Associate Planner PREPARED BY: OC Waste &Recycling(i.e., County of Orange) 300 N. Flower Street, Suite 400 Santa Ana, CA 92703 (714) 834-4107 Contact: John Arnau, CEQA Manager September 2016 317 This document is designed for double-sided printing to conserve natural resources. 318 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction.....................................................................................1-1 2 Responses to Comments............... .......................................................2-1 Errata... ........................... .......................................................2-23 3.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program..................................... 3-1 September 2016 i Table of Contents 319 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank. September 2016 ii Table of Contents 320 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Coyote Canyon Landfill Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update (proposed project) would allow for the demolition of the existing gas-to-energy facility structures by Fortistar and the construction of both temporary and permanent collocated wireless telecommunication facilities at the closed Coyote Canyon Landfill gas-to-energy facility site. The 4.14-acre project site is owned by the County of Orange. AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless all maintain existing facilities at the project site with antennas collocated on a 105-foot-high exhaust stack. The exhaust stack will be demolished, which necessitates the removal of existing wireless telecommunications facility antennas located on it. A conditional use permit is requested to allow the construction of two collocated 65-foot-high faux eucalyptus trees, which will serve as permanent wireless telecommunications facilities for the four carriers. A limited term permit is requested to construct two collocated temporary wireless telecommunications facilities with the demolition of the existing 105-foot-high exhaust stack as well as other structures associated with the gas recovery operations of the site. Once the permanent facilities are constructed and operational, the temporary wireless telecom facilities will be removed. As part of the project, all existing trees and vegetation in poor health will be removed and replaced with new native trees. It is anticipated that the demolition of structures will take approximately three months to complete. The construction of the temporary wireless telecommunication facilities will take approximately two months to complete. The construction of the permanent wireless telecommunication facilities will not occur until September 2017 and is anticipated to take three months to complete. Following a preliminary review of the proposed project, the City of Newport Beach has determined that it is subject to the guidelines and regulations of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This Initial Study addresses the direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental effects of the project, as proposed. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for the proposed project. The IS/MND ws made available for public review and comment pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15105. The public review commenced on August 3, 2016 and expired on September 2, 2016. The IS/MND and supporting attachments were available for review by the general public at: • City of Newport Beach Planning Division, 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660; • Newport Beach Public Library(Corona Del Mar Branch), 420 Marigold Avenue, Corona Del Mar, CA 92625; • Newport Beach Public Library(Mariners Branch), 1300 Irvine Avenue,Newport Beach, CA 92660; • Newport Beach Public Library(Balboa Branch), 100 East Balboa Boulevard,Newport Beach, CA 92660; • Newport Beach Public Library(Central Library), 1000 Avocado Avenue,Newport Beach, CA 92660; and • The City's website at http://www.newportbeachca.gov/cegadocuments September 2016 1-1 Introduction 321 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank. September 2016 1-2 Responses to Comments 322 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 2.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS During the public review period, comments were received on the Draft IS/MND from public agencies and private parties. The following is a list of the persons, firms, or agencies that submitted comments on the IS/MND during the public review period. A. Ryan Lopez,Pipeline Planning Assistant, SoCal Gas, email correspondence dated August 8, 2016. B. Patricia Martz, President, California Cultural Resource Preservation Alliance, Inc., dated August 8, 2016. C. B. Tager, email correspondence dated August 18, 2016. D. Bill Jacobs, Principal Planner, City of Irvine, email correspondence dated August 18, 2016. E. Jillian Wong, Program Supervisor, South Coast Air Quality Management District, dated August 24, 2016. F. William B. Miller,Biomonitor,U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, email correspondence dated August 26, 2016. G. Joanne Lee, WRC Engineer, California Regional Water Quality Control Board— Santa Ana Region, email correspondence dated September 1, 2016. H. Ossama Abu Shahan, Senior Civil Engineer, Orange County Health Care Agency - Environmental Health Division/Solid Waste Local Enforcement Agency, dated September 2, 2016. I. Scott Morgan, Director, Governor's Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse, dated September 2, 2016. Although the State CEQA Guidelines do not require a Lead Agency to prepare written responses to comments received on an IS/MND, the City has elected to prepare the following responses with the intent of conducting a comprehensive and meaningful evaluation of the proposed project. Each comment letter is bracketed and coded, and correlates to the letter assigned to each comment as identified in the list above. September 2016 2-1 Responses to Comments 323 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank. September 2016 2-2 Responses to Comments 32'4' COMMENT LETTER A Zdeba, Benjamin From: Lopez, Ryan <RLopez2@semprautilities.com> Sent: Monday, August 08, 2016 8:30 AM To: Zdeba, Benjamin Subject: Notice of Intent to Adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration Coyote Canyon Landfill; Newport Beach; PA2016-091 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Hello Benjamin Zdeba: Your notification of Proposed Negative Declaration Report has been received by So Cal Gas Distribution. Be aware for your reference: It may take 30 business days for a response. Al California Public Utility Commission Rules require notification of both SoCal Gas Transmission and SoCal Gas Distribution of all work being conducted. You will need to send a cony of your request and Plans to: So Cal Gas Transmission 9400 Oakdale Ave Chatsworth, CA 91311-6511 SoCalGasTransmissionUtilityReciuest@semprautilities.com Thank you for your patience and cooperation. Ryan Lopez SoCalGas Southeast Region - Anaheim HQ Gas Operations - Planning & Engineering Pipeline Planning Assistant- Maps & Letters Desk 1919 S. State College Blvd Anaheim, CA 92806 (714) 634-5067 (714) 634-7287 Fax rlooez2Ca�semorautilities.com IoCalGas A*4evnptaLnergv w,iay THIS MESSAGE I5 INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT Is ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED,CONFIDENTIAL,AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAWS.If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,distribution,forwarding,or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.If you have 1 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration A. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FROM RYAN LOPEZ, PIPELINE PLANNING ASSISTANT, SOCAL GAS, DATED AUGUST 8, 2016. Al. This comment is acknowledged. After receiving the comment, a copy of the IS/MND was sent to SoCal Gas Transmission. In a letter received on September 6, 2016, SoCal Gas Transmission indicated that they have no transmission gas lines on the project site. September 2016 2-4 Responses to Comments 320 D COMMENT LETTER B C c R1 A California Cultural Resource Preservation Alliance, Inc. P.O. Box 54132 An alliance of American Indian and scientific communities working for Irvine,CA 92619-4132 the preservation of archaeological sites and other cultural resources. August 8, 2016 Benjamin M. Zdeba, AICP,Associate Planner City of Newport Beach Re: Mitigated Negative Declaration for Canyon Landfill Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and telecom Update, City of Newport Beach (PA2016-091) Bi Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above mentioned project. We concur with the determination that although the project area is developed,the area may contain buried cultural resources, and support the Mitigated Negative Declaration based on Mitigation Measures MM-7 and MM-8. Sincerely, ++ r Patricia Martz, President 32 j COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration B. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FROM PATRICIA MARTZ, PRESIDENT, CALIFORNIA CULTURAL RESOURCE PRESERVATION ALLIANCE,INC., DATED AUGUST 8, 2016. 131. This comment is acknowledged. September 2016 2-6 Responses to Comments 322 Zdeba, Benjamin COMMENT LETTER C From: btager@cox.net Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 1:00 AM To: Zdeba, Benjamin Subject: coyote canyon landfill If the gas facility will no longer exist,what entity will continue to monitor the gas fields? Has all the methane gas been extracted? C1 i 329 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration C. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FROM B. TAGER, DATED AUGUST 18, 2016. Cl. Landfill gas that is generated within the closed Coyote Canyon Landfill will continue to be collected by a landfill gas collection, flaring and monitoring system. The landfill gas collection, flaring and monitoring system is operated and maintained by Fortistar, under contract to OC Waste &Recycling(i.e., County landfill department and property owner) and monitored by OC Waste & Recycling, the South Coast Air Quality Management District, and the Orange County Environmental Health Division (acting as the Local Enforcement Agency for the California Department of Resources Recovery and Recycling). The landfill gas collection, flaring and monitoring system is highly regulated and is maintained and tested frequently to ensure that no impacts to public health and safety will occur. The operation and maintenance of the landfill gas collection, flaring and monitoring system will continue for as long as the landfill continues to generate landfill gas,which is anticipated to continue for many years in the future. September 2016 2-8 Responses to Comments 330 COMMENT LETTER D Zdeba, Benjamin From: Bill Jacobs <bjacobs@ci.irvine.ca.us> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 5:09 PM To: Zdeba, Benjamin Cc: 'Arnau, John [OCWR] (John.Arnau@ocwr.ocgov.com)' Subject: Coyote Canyon LGR Facility Demo and Telecom Update MND (PA 2016-091) Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Hi Benjamin. Thank you for the opportunity to review the MND for the proposed project.The City of Irvine has comments. If you have not done so already,we would suggest that notice be provided to the owners/residents of the Turtle Ridge D1 neighborhoods in Irvine from which the project is visible. Please let me know if you have any questions. -Bill BILL IACOBS,AICP CEP I PRINCIPAL PLANNER City of Irvine I Community Development Department bjacobs@oJrvine.ca.us P. 949.724.6521 1 F. 949.724.6440 Mailing: P.O. Box 19575 1 Irvine, CA 92623 Planning &Development Services I General Plan I Zoning Code I Irvine Quick Records I Property Zoning Lookup I Irvine Business Complex 1 331 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration D. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FROM BILL JACOBS, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, CITY OF IRVINE, DATED AUGUST 18,2016. D1. The Notice of Intent was not distributed to residents in the Turtle Ridge residential area of Irvine,north of the project site. Views of the project site from the majority of homes in the Turtle Ridge area are blocked by SR-73. Only homes at the highest elevations of the Turtle Ridge community have views of the project site. As analyzed in Section 2.0 Discussion of Environmental Checklist Questions, I. Aesthetics in the IS/MND, the proposed project would result in an aesthetic enhancement when compared to existing conditions. With the proposed project, the 105-foot high exhaust stack will be demolished. The existing dead and dying non-native trees that surround the project site will be replaced with native white alders, western sycamores and coast live oak trees that are more consistent visually with the native habitat in the NCCP Habitat Reserve that surrounds the project site. These new trees will also provide effective screening of the two proposed 65-feet high permanent wireless telecommunication facilities at the project site. OC Waste & Recycling will maintain the new trees over the long-term to ensure that the trees are healthy and are providing the visual screening that is necessary for the proposed project. September 2016 2-10 Responses to Comments 332 COMMENT LETTER E South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 (909) 396-2000 • www.agmd.gov SENT VIA USPS AND E-MAIL: August 24,2016 bzdeba@-newportbeachca.gov Benjamin M. Zdeba,AICP,Associate Planner City of Newport Beach Planning Division 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (Draft MND) for the Proposed Coyote Canyon Landfill Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecomm Update (PA2016-091) The South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) staff appreciates the opportunity to comment on the above-mentioned document both as a commenting agency and a responsible E 1 agency. The following comments are meant as guidance for the Lead Agency and should be incorporated into the Final MND. In the project description,the Lead Agency proposes demolition of the existing gas-to-energy structures followed by the construction of both temporary and permanent collocated wireless telecommunication facilities. If the proposed telecommunication facilities will also include a diesel-fueled generator(s)that is rated greater than 50 brake horsepower(bhp), a permit would be required for each generator in accordance with SCAQMD rules including Rule 1470— E2 Requirements for Stationary Diesel-Fueled Internal Combustion and Other Compression Initial Engines. If there are any questions concerning permitting,permit questions can be directed to Engineering and Compliance Staff at(909) 396-2315. Further, the project includes some demolition that could include some support structures on the facility site as well as excavation during soil disturbance activities. Starting on Page 12 of the Air Study,' the Lead Agency discusses SCAQMD Rules. In addition to that discussion, compliance with the following SCAQMD rules should also be included in the Final MND, if applicable: Rule 1403 —Asbestos Emissions from Demolition/Renovation Activities would apply if asbestos is found during demolition, and Rule 1166—Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Decontamination of Soil would apply if soils containing Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) are encountered during soil disturbance activities. 'DMND,CEQA Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Technical Study(LSA Associates,Inc.,Memorandum Dated May 20,2016) 333 Benjamin M. Zdeba, AICP 1 August 24, 2016 Associate Planner Please provide the SCAQMD with written responses to all comments contained herein prior to the adoption of the Final MND. The SCAQMD staff is available to work with the Lead Agency to address these issues and any other air quality questions that may arise. Please contact Gordon E4 Mize,Air Quality Specialist—CEQA Section, at(909)396-3302, if you have any questions regarding these comments. Sincerely, Pala 7" Jillian Wong,Ph.D. Program Supervisor Planning,Rule Development&Area Sources JW:GM ORC160804-05 Control Number 33.4 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration E. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FROM JH.LIAN WONG, PROGRAM SUPERVISOR, SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, DATED AUGUST 24, 2016. E1. This comment is acknowledged. E2. This comment is acknowledged. One of the cellular carriers, T-Mobile, will require a diesel-fueled generator to provide power for their collocated antenna arrays. T-Mobile will apply for a permit from SCAQMD for the new generator, per the requirements of Rule 1470. E3. Rule 1403 is already referenced in Section 2.0 Discussion of Environmental Checklist Questions, VIII Hazards & Hazardous Materials, page 54. Section 2.0 Discussion of Environmental Checklist Questions, VIII Hazards & Hazardous Materials, page 54, fourth paragraph (which continues as the first paragraph on page 55) of the Draft IS/MND has been revised to indicate that while no volatile organic compound emissions from underlying soils are anticipated during demolition activities, Fortistar will follow Rule 1166 (volatile organic compound emissions from decontamination of soil) if soils are encountered that have the potential to contain volatile organic compounds; refer to the Errata section of this document. E4. This comment is acknowledged. September 2016 2-13 Responses to Comments 33.E COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank. September 2016 2-14 Responses to Comments 33(o Arnau, John [OCWRJ COMMENT LETTER F From: Miller,William <william b miller@fws.gov> Sent: Friday,August 26, 2016 8:50 AM To: Arnau,John IOCWRI Cc: Beck,Christine@Wildlife;Jonathan Snyder; David Mayer Subject: Re:Coyote Canyon Landfill Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update - Irrigation for New Native Trees John-I spoke with Christine Beck of CDFW and while we generally would prefer for there to be no irrigation surrounding the gas recovery/telecom facility because of the potential for any irrigation to facilitate the presence of the invasive non-native Argentine ant in the habitat reserve,should the proposal continue to include replacement of the existing irrigation system,we agree that an underground F 1 drip irrigation system is likely to be the best design provided impacts to intact native habitat can be avoided. Should replacement plantings prove unnecessary or unsuccessful,we encourage OC Waste and Recycling to terminate the irrigation system entirely. Sincerely,Will Miller On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 7:26 AM, Arnau,John [OCWRJ <John.Arnau(aocwr.ocgov.com>wrote: Jonathan, Will, Dave and Christine, regarding the Coyote Canyon Landfill Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update,not being a biologist, in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, I proposed an above ground water line that would serve as irrigation for the proposed white alders, western sycamores and coast live oak. After speaking with Chris Meloni of LSA yesterday, it is my understanding that this is not a good idea,as Argentine ants will frequently travel along an above ground water line, potentially invading native habitat areas. Would a potential solution be to underground the water line? As discussed previously for the carriers equipment sheds that exist immediately outside the perimeter wall, there is a buffer between the wall and the non-native screening trees(shown in the attached exhibit). This is where the existing irrigation line exists that was installed in 1988 that broke many years ago and was subsequently never fixed. Could we pull out the old irrigation system and put in a new irrigation system? Installing a new below-ground irrigation system would not result in any impacts to native habitat. What are your thoughts? Thank you. J -- John Arnau Manager, Environmental Services,CEQA/Habitat Support 300 North Flower Street, Suite 400 Santa Ana, CA 92703 Office: 714-834-4107 William B. Miller, Biomonitor U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2177 Salk Avenue, Suite 250 Carlsbad, California 92008 760.431.9440 extension 206 william b miller@fws.eov t 33� COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration F. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FROM WILLIAM B. MILLER, BIOMONITOR, U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE,DATED AUGUST 26, 2016. F1. In response to this comment, to support the new native trees that will be installed and maintained surrounding the perimeter of the project site, a below ground irrigation system will be installed. The new native white alders, western sycamores and coast live oak trees are necessary to provide screening for the permanent wireless telecommunication facilities, in order to reduce aesthetics impacts to the adjacent community to a less than significant level. Mitigation measure MM-1 on pages 30 and 82 of the Draft IS/MND has been revised to indicate that the proposed irrigation line will no longer be above ground; refer to the Errata section of this document. September 2016 2-16 Responses to Cominents 338 COMMENT LETTER G Zdeba, Benjamin From: Lee, Joanne@Waterboards <Joanne.Lee@waterboards.ca.gov> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 3:29 PM To: Zdeba, Benjamin Cc: Jeff.Arbour@ocwr.ocgov.com; Robertson, Glenn@Waterboards; Li, Cindy@Waterboards Subject: Demolition of gas-to-energy structures &construction of telecom facilities, Coyote Canyon Landfill (SCH#2016081012) Good afternoon Mr. Zdeba: We have received and reviewed the Initial Study/Mitigated Neg. Dec. for the above-referenced proposed project. We G1 have no comment. Thanks, P64m Q Zee, PE WRC Engineer Land Disposal & DoD Program Section California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region 3737 Main Street, Suite 500 Riverside, CA 92501 Joanne.Lee@waterboards.ca.gov Tel: 951-782-3291 Fax: 951-781-6288 My current work schedule is Monday through Friday, 8-4:30 pm. 1 339 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration G. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FROM JOANNE LEE,WRC ENGINEER, CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD— SANTA ANA REGION, DATED SEPTEMBER 1, 2016. Gl. This comment is acknowledged. September 2016 2-18 Responses to Comments S40 or health COMMENT LETTER MARK A.REFOWITZ DIRECTOR TOR RICHARD SANCHEZ ASSISTANT DIRECTOR CARE AGENCYSTEVE THRONSON DEPUTY AGENCY DIRECTOR REGULATORYIMEDICAL SERVICES LIZA FRIAS,RENS REGULATORY/MEDICAL HEALTH SERVICES INTERIM DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 1241 E DYER ROAD,SURE R0 SANTAANA CA 92705 TEIIRHONE n14417J5 M FAX Ou17U 7722 EMAIL ~Ir tk cM mm September 2,2016 Benjamin M.Zdeba,AICP,Associate Planner City of Newport Beach,Planning Division 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach,CA 92660 Dear Mr.Zdeba, Subject: IS/MND for Landfill Cas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update Former Coyote Canyon Landfill,SWIS No.30-AB-0017,Newport Beach The Orange County Health Care Agency Environmental Health Division is the Solid Waste Local Enforcement Agency in Orange County(OC LEA). As a Responsible Agency under CEQA,OC LEA has reviewed Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Document) for the demolition of the landfill gas- to-energy(LFGTE)facility and telecom upgrade(Project)at former Coyote Canyon Landfill(Site). H1 Proposed Project activities,as detailed in the CEQA Document,will be mostly completed by end of 2016, and involve: A) Demolition of the power plant, B) Backfilling with clean imported soil,crushed concrete and asphalt, C) Construction of 2 temporary wireless telecommunication towers, D) Protecting in place the landfill gas flare station, E) Replacement of the temporary telecommunication towers with permanent ones in late 2017,and F) Removal of existing non-native trees surrounding the LFGTE facility and replacement with native plants OC LEA has the following feedback: 1. Since the Project is within the Site's permitted boundaries and within 1,000 R of buried waste footprint(South Canyon and possibly East Canyon),construction of the temporary and permanent telecommunication towers should comply with the applicable requirements of Califomia Code of - Regulations, Title 27 (27 CCR), section 21190. hmp://www.calrecycle.ca.pov/LawsfRep,ulafons/litle27/chi sb5.htm#Article2 . 2. In accordance with 27 CCR Section 21890 (ham://w�su calrecvcle.ca eov/Laws/Regulations?itle27/ch4sb4.htm#21769), OC Waste & Recycling should update the pertinent sections of the approved Post-Closure Maintenance Plan(70 - Revision)dated April 2016. 3. The Regional Water Quality Control Board-Santa Ana Region should be notified before importing 10,000 yd'of soil for use as backfill in the demolished plant area If you have any questions,please contact me via e-mail (oabu-shabanw ochca-com), or phone(714)433- 6271. Yours Truly, 00z— — Ossama"Sam"Abu Shahan,RCE,RME, BCEE,CPP,QEP Senior Civil Engineer Solid Waste Local Enforcement Agency Environmental Health COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration H. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FROM OSSAMA ABU SHABAN, SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER, ORANGE COUNTY HEALTH CARE AGENCY—ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION/SOLID WASTE LOCAL ENFORCEMENT AGENCY,DATED SEPTEMBER 2, 2016. Hl. This comment is acknowledged. H2. This comment is acknowledged. 143. This comment is acknowledged. 114. The Regional Board was provided with a copy of the IS/NIND for the proposed project and had no comments,per Comment Letter G. September 2016 2-20 Responses to Comments S 4'2 COMMENT LETTER I Eo``�cw".w� f: -�� •� : STATE OF CALIFORNIAJb GOVERNOR'S OFFICE of PLANNING AND RESEARCH STATE CLEARINGHOUSE AND PLANNING UNIT �r'rEOF� n EDMUND G.BROWN JR. REN ALEx GOVBRNOR DLF=R September 2,2016 Benjamin M.Zdeba City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Dr Newport Beach,CA 92660 Subject: Coyote Canyon Landfill Gas Recovery Facility Demo and Telecom Update SCH#: 2016081012 Dear Benjamin M.Zdeba: The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named Mitigated Negative Declaration to selected state I-1 agencies for review. The review period closed on September 1,2016, and no state agencies submitted comments by that date. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents,pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Please call the State Clearinghouse at(916)445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. If you have a question about the above-named project,please refer to the ten-digit State Clearinghouse number when contacting this office. Sineerely, Scott Morgan Director,State Clearinghouse I 140010th Street P.O.Box 3044 Sacramento,California 95812-3044 (916)445-0613 FAX(916)323-3018 www.opr.ca.gov 343 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration I. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FROM SCOTT MORGAN, DIRECTOR, GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH, STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, DATED SEPTEMBER 2, 2016. Il. This comment is acknowledged. September 2016 2-22 Responses to Comments 3-4---4 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ERRATA Changes to the Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) are noted below. A double-underline indicates additions to the text; strikeout indicates deletions to the text. Where changes are being made as a result of comments received on the project during the 30-day public review period, changes have been analyzed and responded in the Responses to Comments, above. Minor additions and deletions have also been made for the purposes of clarification. The changes to the Draft IS/MND do not affect the overall conclusions of the environmental document. Changes are listed by page and, where appropriate, by paragraph. Section 1.5 Project Description, page 13, first paragraph of the Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) will be modified in the Final IS/MND, as follows: There will be two collocated temporary wireless telecommunication facilities that will both be 65 feet in height to the tallest point. Sprint and AT&T will have one temporary wireless telecommunication facility and Verizon Wireless and T-Mobile will have the other temporary wireless telecommunication facility. Both facilities will have two antenna arrays attached each. For the Sprint and AT&T facility, the top of the Sprint antenna array will be at 65 feet of the wire) and the top of the AT&T antenna array will be at 56 feet. For the Verizon and T- Mobile facility, the top of the T-Mobile antenna array will be at 65 feet (i.e., ton of the wire) and the top of the Verizon antenna array will be at 54 feet. The antenna arrays will be at approximately the same height as the existing antenna arrays on the exhaust stack that will be demolished. Section 1.5 Project Description, page 16, third paragraph of the Draft IS/MND will be modified in the Final IS/MND, as follows: Once the temporary wireless telecommunication facilities are operational, and after the demolition activities are complete, the four carriers will begin work on the construction of the permanent collocated wireless telecommunication facilities, in the fall of 2017, after the completion of the migratory bird nesting season which is from February 15 to August 31. There will be two permanent collocated facilities that will both be 65 feet in height to the tallest point. Sprint and AT&T will have one permanent collocated facility and Verizon Wireless and T-Mobile will have the other permanent collocated facility. Both facilities will have two antenna arrays attached each. For the Sprint and AT&T facility, the top of the Sprint antenna array will be at 61 feet, 8 inches (i.e., ton of the wire) and the top of the AT&T antenna array will be at 52 feet, four inches. For the Verizon and T-Mobile facility, the top of the T-Mobile antenna array will be at 65 feet (i.e., ton of the wire) and the top of the Verizon antenna array will be at 54 feet. The antenna arrays will be at approximately the same height as the existing antenna arrays on the exhaust stack that will be demolished. The location of the two proposed permanent facilities on the project site are shown on Figure 6. The two permanent wireless communication facilities will be designed to blend in with the adjacent tall trees that currently surround the perimeter wall that surrounds the project site. A representative photo of this type of permanent wireless telecommunication facility is shown on Figure 9. It is anticipated that the September 2016 2-23 Responses to Comments 3-45 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration permanent facilities will take approximately three months to construct and are anticipated to be operational in December 2017, as which time the temporary facilities will be removed from the project site. Section 2.0 Discussion of Environmental Checklist Questions, I. Aesthetics,page 30, Mitigation Measure MM-1 of the Draft IS/MND will be modified in the Final IS/MND, as follows: (MM-1) In order to reduce long-term aesthetics/views impacts to a less than significant level, OC Waste &Recycling will implement a Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan for the proposed project which will remove the majority of the non-native trees that currently surround the project site and replace them with native white alders, western sycamores and coast live oak trees. The new trees will also have a dedicated above greund below-eround irrigation line to ensure that the new trees have sufficient irrigation. In addition, OC Waste & Recycling will ensure that a qualified habitat maintenance contractor will provide long-term habitat maintenance and monitoring for the new trees. Section 2.0 Discussion of Environmental Checklist Questions, VIII. Hazards &Hazardous Materials,page 54, fourth paragraph(which continues as the first paragraph on page 55)will be modified in the Final IS/MND, as follows: September 2016 2-24 Responses to Comments S40 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Federal and State regulations govern the renovation and demolition of structures where materials containing lead and asbestos are present. These requirements include: SCAQMD Rules and Regulations pertaining to asbestos abatement (including Rule 1403), Construction Safety Orders 1529 (pertaining to asbestos) and 1532.1 (pertaining to lead) from Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, Part 61, Subpart M of the Code of Federal Regulations (pertaining to asbestos), and lead exposure guidelines provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Asbestos and lead abatement must be performed and monitored by contractors with appropriate certifications from the State Department of Health Services. In addition, Cal/OSHA has regulations concerning the use of hazardous materials, including requirements for safety training, availability of safety equipment,hazardous materials exposure warnings, and emergency action and fire prevention plan preparation. Cal/OSHA enforces the hazard communication program regulations, which include provisions for identifying and labeling hazardous materials, describing the hazards of chemicals, and documenting employee-training programs. All demolition that could result in the release of lead and/or asbestos must be conducted according to CaUOSHA standards.' For the demolition of structures at the gas-to-energy facility site, the storage building roof, shop building roof and administration building roof contain asbestos. The total amount of area that is estimated to contain asbestos that will require remediation is approximately 373 square feet, which is estimated to generate enough asbestos material to fill a 5-gallon bucket. A mitigation measure has been added to ensure that any significant impacts from asbestos materials will be mitigated to a less than significant level. While no volatile organic compound emissions from underlying soils are anticipated during demolition activities. Fortistar will follow Rule 1166 (volatile organic compound emissions from decontamination of soil) if soils are encountered that have the potential to contain volatile organic compounds. Section 3.0 Inventory of Mitigation Measures, Aesthetics, page 82,Aesthetics, Mitigation Measure MM-1 of the Draft IS/MND will be modified in the Final IS/MND, as follows: (MM-1) In order to reduce long-term aesthetics/views impacts to a less than significant level, OC Waste &Recycling will implement a Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan for the proposed project which will remove the majority of the non-native trees that currently surround the project site and replace them with native white alders, western sycamores and coast live oak trees. The new trees will also have a dedicated above g+atindbelow-ground irrigation line to ensure that the new trees have sufficient irrigation. In addition, OC Waste &Recycling will ensure that a qualified habitat maintenance contractor will provide long-term habitat maintenance and monitoring for the new trees. ' City of Newport Beach General Plan FIR Update,p.4.6-20,July 2006. September 2016 2-25 Responses to Comments S4:7 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank. September 2016 2-26 Responses to Comments 342 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 3.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CEQA requires that when a public agency completes an environmental document which includes measures to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects, the public agency must adopt a reporting or monitoring plan. This requirement ensures that environmental impacts found to be significant will be mitigated. The reporting or monitoring plan must be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation (Public Resources Code Section 21081.6). In compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, the attached Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared for the proposed Coyote Canyon Landfill Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update. This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is intended to provide verification that all mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study prepared for the project are monitored and reported. Monitoring will include 1) verification that each mitigation measure has been implemented; 2)recordation of the actions taken to implement each mitigation; and 3) retention of records in the project file. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program delineates responsibilities for monitoring the project, but also allows the City of Newport Beach flexibility and discretion in determining how best to monitor implementation. Monitoring procedures will vary according to the type of mitigation measure. Adequate monitoring consists of demonstrating that monitoring procedures took place and that mitigation measures were implemented. Reporting consists of establishing a record that a mitigation measure is being implemented, and generally involves the following steps: • The City distributes reporting forms to the appropriate entities for verification of compliance. • Departments/agencies with reporting responsibilities will review the Initial Study, which provides general background information on the reasons for including specified mitigation measures. • Problems or exceptions to compliance will be addressed to the City as appropriate. • Periodic meetings may be held during project implementation to report on compliance of mitigation measures. • Responsible parties provide the City with verification that monitoring has been conducted and ensure, as applicable, that mitigation measures have been implemented. Monitoring compliance may be documented through existing review and approval programs such as field inspection reports and plan review. • The City prepares a reporting form periodically during the construction phase and an annual report summarizing all project mitigation monitoring efforts. • Appropriate mitigation measures will be included in construction documents and/or conditions of permits/approvals. September 2016 3-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 3-x( COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Minor changes to the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, if required, would be made in accordance with CEQA and would be permitted after further review and approval by the City. Such changes could include reassignment of monitoring and reporting responsibilities, plan redesign to make any appropriate improvements, and/or modification, substitution or deletion of mitigation measures subject to conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. No change will be permitted unless the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program continues to satisfy the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6. September 2016 3-2 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 350 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Monitoring Party Mitigation and Monitoring Responsibl VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Number Mitigation Measure Reporting Milestones a for Process Monitoring Initials Date Remarks AESTHETICS MM-1 In order to reduce long-term Review of Prior to City of aesthetics/views impacts to a Final Plans; Approval of Newport less than significant level, OC Construction Final Plans; Beach Waste & Recycling will Inspection During Planning implement a Tree Construction Division Replacement and Revegetation Plan for the proposed project which will remove the majority of the non-native trees that currently surround the project site and replace them with native white alders, western sycamores and coast live oak trees. The new trees will also have a dedicated below-ground irrigation line to ensure that the new trees receive sufficient irrigation. In addition, OC Waste & Recycling will ensure that a qualified habitat maintenance contractor will provide long- term habitat maintenance and monitoring for the new trees. September 2016 3-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 351 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration MM-2 The Final Tree Replacement Review of Prior to City of and Revegetation Plan will be Final Plans; Approval of Newport modified by the City as Construction Final Plans; Beach necessary to add additional Inspection During Planning white alders and western Construction Division sycamore trees, that grow more quickly than coast live oak trees, so that the Revegetation Plan provides no major gaps for the long-term visual screening of the project site. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MM-3 To avoid potential impacts to Review of Prior to City of active bird nests, including Final Plans; Approval of Newport coastal California gnatcatchers Construction Final Plans; Beach or migratory birds, the Inspection During Planning proposed demolition of Construction Division structures, the construction of temporary and permanent wireless telecommunication facilities, and implementation of the Tree Replacement and Revegetation Plan at the project site will comply with the NCCP Construction Minimization Measures. Specifically, these activities will occur outside the nesting bird season (i.e., February 15 to August 31 . September 2016 3-4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 352 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration MM-4 A qualified biologist will Review of Prior to City of conduct a pre-construction Final Plans; Approval of Newport survey of the proposed work Construction Final Plans; Beach areas within one week prior to Inspection During Planning the start of the work to verify Construction Division that no special-status species, such as coastal California gnatcatchers, or migratory birds, would be adversely affected by the proposed activities. MM-5 For the proposed demolition Review of Prior to City of activities and for the Final Plans; Approval of Newport construction of the temporary Construction Final Plans; Beach and permanent wireless Inspection During Planning telecommunication facilities, Construction Division all vehicles using the project site access road will remain on the asphalt access road. To prevent any impacts to coastal sage scrub, no staging areas, stockpiles, equipment storage, or vehicle turn outs will be permitted on the shoulder of the access road. September 2016 3-5 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 353 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration MM-6 As a part of the contract for Review of Prior to City of tree removal activities, OC Final Plans; Approval of Newport Waste & Recycling will ensure Construction Final Plans; Beach that the contractor provides Inspection During Planning methods to protect existing Construction Division coastal sage scrub so that there will be no removal or disturbance to coastal sage scrub during tree removal activities. CULTURAL RESOURCES MM-7 The project applicant shall Prior to Prior to City of retain an archaeological and Approval of Approval of Newport paleontological resource Final Plans; Final Plans; Beach monitor to monitor the During During Planning project's subsurface areas Construction Construction Division during land disturbance from demolition and construction activities. If any archaeological or paleontological resources are discovered, the archaeological/paleontological monitor will have the authority to stop work, assess the resources found, and implement a plan for the September 2016 3-6 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 354 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration removal of the archaeological/paleontological resources if deemed significant. MM-8 During construction activities, Prior to Prior to City of the project applicant shall Approval of Approval of Newport allow representatives of Final Plans; Final Plans; Beach cultural organizations, During During Planning including Native American Construction Construction Division tribes (i.e., Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation), to access the project site on a volunteer basis to monitor grading and excavation activities. September 2016 3-7 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 355 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration HAZARDS & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MM-9 Fortistar will complete an Prior to Prior to City of asbestos abatement plan, Approval of Approval of Newport pursuant to SCAQMD permit Final Plans; Final Plans; Beach requirements. The asbestos During During Planning abatement will be performed Construction Construction Division by a Cal/OSHA registered asbestos remediation company. After the asbestos is removed from the project site it will be disposed at an approved disposal facility. MM-10 OC Waste & Recycling will Prior to Prior to City of remove the non-native trees Approval of Approval of Newport that currently surround the Final Plans; Final Plans; Beach project site in order to prevent During During Planning a potential fire hazard. The Construction Construction Division existing trees will be replaced with native trees, with a dedicated irrigation system, which will significantly improve fire safety over existing conditions. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC MM-11 Prior to the initiation of Prior to Prior to City of demolition activities at the Approval of Approval of Newport project site, Fortistar, in Final Plans; Final Plans; Beach consultation with the carriers, During During Planning will prepare a traffic control Construction Construction Division plan for demolition and construction. The traffic September 2016 3-8 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program S50 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration control plan will include the staggering of truck trips throughout the day on Newport Coast Drive, so that the minimum practicable number of truck trips will occur during the a.m. peak period, to reduce impacts as much as possible to Sage Hill High School and both the SR-73 on and off-ramps at Newport Coast Drive. MM-12 All demolition and construction Prior to Prior to City of vehicle drivers will be informed Approval of Approval of Newport that turning right on the red Final Plans; Final Plans; Beach light at the traffic signal at the During During Planning intersection of the project site Construction Construction Division access road and Newport Coast Drive will be prohibited for the duration of demolition and construction activities. A sign will be posted at the entrance to the intersection to remind drivers that they are prohibited from making a right- turn at the red light onto Newport Coast Drive. September 2016 3-9 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 35 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration MM-13 For the duration of the Prior to Prior to City of demolition and construction Approval of Approval of Newport activities, electronic signage Final Plans; Final Plans; Beach will be placed near Sage Hill During During Planning High School to inform drivers Construction Construction Division regarding the duration of the demolition and construction activities and to indicate that large trucks may be present for the duration of construction and demolition activities. MM-14 Construction spotters with Prior to Prior to City of walkie-talkies will be assigned Approval of Approval of Newport on both ends of the project site Final Plans; Final Plans; Beach access road to guide trucks During During Planning during project demolition and Construction Construction Division construction activities. Trucks will only be able to travel in one direction on the one lane paved access road at a time. Trucks that are waiting to go up the access road will wait across the street on the main canyon landfill property until the spotter informs them that it is safe to proceed up the access road to the project site. September 2016 3-10 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 352 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY FACILITY DEMOLITION AND TELECOM UPDATE Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank. September 2016 3-11 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 359 V� QP �P ��o Attachment No. PC 5 Applicants' Justification 3�1 V� QP �P PA2016-091 Core Development Services core 3350E Birch Street,Ste.250 Brea,[A 92821 Main: (7141729-8404 Fax: (714)333-4441 web: www.core.us.com Required Findings for Telecom Facilities 20662 Newport Coast Drive (a) The proposed telecom facility is visually compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed facilities are visually compatible with the surrounding area. The existing facilities are mounted to a 105'tall exhaust stack and are not screened from view. As such, the existing conditions make the facilities highly visible from surrounding roads and properties. The relocated facilities will consist of two (2) 65' tall mono-eucalyptus facilities so that the four(4) wireless carriers will be consolidated into two (2) much shorter structures and will be screened from view. The faux tree designs will blend in with the surrounding area as those properties are undeveloped open space and contain a variety of mature trees. (b) The proposed telecom facility complies with height, location,and design standards, as provided for in this chapter. The proposed telecom facilities comply with the standards of Chapter 20.49. The project involves relocating four(4) existing wireless communications facilities because the exhaust stack on which they are installed is being demolished. In accordance with Section 20.49.040, Preferred Locations,the new facilities are being collocated at the existing facility. While the existing antennas are fully visible and do not utilize any screening methods, the proposed structures will be stealth facilities. In compliance with Section 20.49.050,the mono-eucalyptus designs are compatible with the surrounding natural elements and will blend in with the existing vegetation at the site. The two (2)facilities are 65' in height in order to accommodate two (2) sets of antennas and provide the necessary coverage for each carrier as a result of losing the height each carrier had on the exhaust stack. The maximum allowable height in the O-S Zone is 50'. In accordance with Section 20.49.050(C) the Planning Commission may approve a CUP for an additional fifteen (15) feet above the maximum height limit for the zoning district in which the facility is located. (c) An alternative site located further from a residential district, public park or public facility, cannot feasibly fulfill the coverage needs fulfilled by the installation at the proposed site. The project site is not located in or immediately adjacent to a residential zone, public park,or public facility. All four(4)wireless communication facilities are existing uses at the project site and are forced to relocate on the property due to the pending demolition of the exhaust stack on which they are currently located. 363 PA2016-091 (d) An alternative plan that would result in higher preference facility class category for the proposed facility is not available or reasonably feasible and desirable under the circumstances. An alternative plan that would result in higher preference facility class category for the proposed facilities is not possible. The project consists of relocating four(4) existing wireless communications facilities on the same property due to the demolition of the exhaust stack. By definition, the project qualifies as Class 4 facilities. With the removal of the exhaust stack there are no other structures at the site to collocate on. The carriers are making all reasonable efforts to comply with Chapter 20.49 by collocating on two (2) stealth structures. SO4 PA2016-091 Findings to Increase Height (a) The increased height will not result in undesirable or abrupt scale changes or relationships being created between the proposed telecom facility and existing adjacent developments or public spaces. The increased height of the two (2)facilities from 50'to 65'will not result in an undesirable change in scale between the proposed facilities and adjacent developments and public spaces. The existing exhaust stack is 105' tall and all four(4) of the wireless facilities are non-stealth which makes the current conditions at the site very visible and incompatible with the surrounding environment. The proposed project will consist of the two (2) stealth facilities that are 40' lower in height and designed as faux eucalyptus trees to blend in with the surrounding natural environment as the properties surrounding the site are undeveloped and contain a variety of established trees. (b) Establishment of the telecom facility at the requested height is necessary to provide service. It is necessary that the proposed facilities are 65' in height so that all four(4) wireless providers can meet their coverage objectives. The existing facilties are mounted on the exhaust stack and have direct line-of-site to their intended coverage objectives (Newport Coast Drive, residences in the vicinity of Ridge Park Road and San Joaquin Hills Road, and Highway 73). The relocated facilities must maintain the same coverage as exists now while accommodating for design restrictions that two (2) of the carriers (AT&T and T-Mobile) are collocating on the towers and their antennas will be 5' below the top set of antennas to prevent interference between the two sets of antennas. Further,there is additional branching above the top set of antennas for design purposes and this further reduces the height for both sets of antennas. S05 V� QP �P 3�C Attachment No. PC 6 Applicants' Coverage Maps 3�� V� QP �P 3�8 PA2016-091 Assumptions •°• Propagation of the site plots are based on our current Atoll (Design tool) project tool that shows the preferred design of the AT&T 4G-LTE network coverage. ❖ The propagation referenced in this package is based on proposed LTE coverage f AT&T users in the surrounding buildings, in vehicles and at street level . For your reference, the scale shown ranges from good to poor coverage with gradual changes in coverage showing best coverage to marginal and finally poor signal levels. • The plots shown are based on the following criteria: Existing: Since LTE network modifications are not yet On-Air. The first slide is a snap shot of the area showing the existing site without LTE coverage in the AT&T network. The Planned LTE Coverage with the Referenced Site: Assuming all the planned neighboring sites of the target site are approved by the jurisdiction and thE referenced site is also approved and On-Air, the propagation is displayed with the planned legends provided. Without Target site: Assuming all the planned neighboring sites are approved by the jurisdiction and On-Air and the referenced site is Off-Air, the propagation i displayed with the legends provided. AT&T Supplemental Application(06126/20) PA2016-091 17111111 Exhibit 7.03 LTE Coverage — Neighboring sites Only (On-Air) v , •� �iR� . Sha Sr rid sa'3��'b�d - � ,; a. 1 vi T x �r n'� E Sweet Calton J� Cezanne f 44 \�N �r Cie CLL03481 . "16 f� a`"•,,�I. eye �� �ss�2' - - - IS12 � o� tBJ0aQU 114000 Ord t L 4,b% rb fir^ " t9o' gg r IIi:E\Il�(nrrall Sl�,n:J) Y '• Lm }^ ,� �b� m pa�� t> _ i5Jlim Indmn acral K5,11;11'III Wil5LL9u1 • Qm ,� SGS Proposed Macro Site .� %dBm Untdow SwW �\ Qm �j ! 2q + �Ca O Existing Macro Sites ct Jt V AT&T Supplemental Application(051210) PA2016-091 Exhibit 7.04 LTE Coverage — Stand Alone V, w E a Mai "p S,reetB3y $ d Pyr yVp,� ppl - `!c 1?• o' Art, 4a�P1 �• f " f'`OFo ��l W Yacprl Myz 3 9 � 0 �w Rill ,ysRa a na.p� s c ! 0, BI�� , > ��.'<a dater^ ..,,• '� A � • � �9C 8 .3� � \ Cr ,� � ..� '.l ✓ ti,, a e. .� / o ' , ` ` 11 W\11(( orrr:nlr signal) t# r t - i. 7519nr Induur sluul N\INm In \'hick 3Nnal �' G proposed Macro Site j ),uWINn Uinducir Tool 1 g •_� , li % Q Existing Macro Sites to , 1 AT&T Supplemental Application(06120207) PA2016-091 Tr---------f Exhibit 7.04 LTE Coverage — Neighboring sites & CLL03481 C i A E c1� ^ Svket 6 ;n r r • f tante /A ' 00 �" `- C-LL03481 I111i P� may. NIS lir "lH " �o j. v •C arty, 0, i 751111", IiiJmnaural { _ � � � b � x'xlfm In 1 duan:u• �! J Proposed Macro Site y O "AWI:m twtdu"r•,I;nel G 2 + y Q Existing Macro Sites AT&T Supplemental Application(0612612016 PA2016-091 Coverage Legend Rethink Possible' In-Building Service: In general, the areas shown in dark green should have the strongest signal strength and be sufficient for most in-building coverage. However, in-building coverage can and will be adversely affected by the thickness/construction type of walls, or your location in the building (i.e., in the basement, in the middle of the building with multiple walls, etc.) In-Transit Service: The areas shown in the yellow should be sufficient for on- street or in-the-open coverage, most in-vehicle coverage and possibly some in-building coverage. Outdoor Service: The areas shown in the purple should have sufficient sign strength for on-street or in-the-open coverage, but may not have it for in- vehicle coverage or in-building coverage. AT&T Supplemental Applloali.n(0512�01a) PA2016-091 p Best Coverage Plot — PRE ' �.,,�, r. 4' .L�".. 7!. moi• :;r; z V 7 =� 1: � r . '':`-�• . v 'vOw�se �wc,srsoam:i�aav-.ao�vyasaos�c,• V 2013 Sprint.This information is subject to Sprint policies regarding use and is the property of Sprint andror its relevant affiliates and may contain restricted Ir confidentfal or privileged materials intended for the sole use of the intended recipient.Any review,use.distribution or disclosure is prohibited wilhoul authoruation. Sprint SPRINT Supplemental Application(I15/�0 ) r• Best Coverage • lot OG25XC211 SPRINT Supplemental Application(n-12Z�06� 1rr 1 t V } TC' �T _ � t v-. - r•1 �. ti .. u�i.ii .illi Pi 1 . i r r •� r� l dyy�av, 0. .F f :2073 Sprint.This inlortnalion is sublecl to Sprint polYcies regarding use and is the property of Sprinl andor M1s relevam all�hales and may conlam resmcletl Sprint\,� ..on!idantial or privllegetl materials intentled for the sole use of the intentletl recipient.Any review,use.distnbubon or tlisclosure Is prohibtetl without authonzanon. r• Best Coverage Plot Post � • ice Ar Sil Supplemental Application V p� :.,tom •�°�_ i• dt'ur Y l• t I nta 0. x t'r ®2013 Sprint.This inlormahon is wbjecl to Sprint policies regarding use and is the property of Spnnl andor its relevant aflmates ano may Conlan restncletl Sprint\� 3 COnlitlentlal or privTegetl materials intentled for the sole use of the intendetl recip�enl Any remew.use.distnbution or disGosure�s prohiWted wrthoul authonzahon. (n/22Q) Without site LA02253A - _ tnbu� il„_dinq commercial nbuild;n¢ reslden:ial ' y. n-Car —� Outdoor 116A s3A _� �tqui i .. wr*t LAI3106C i' T • •Mobile• TMOBILE Supplemental Application AY12 176) With site LA13164D A - - Inbuilding commercial Inbuildin residential sa 100 OAll w- r In-Car utdoor 18A 02252A l3106C r . T..Mobile, TMOBILE Supplemental Application(0S12;�209) .� tw tb WIP-PWO, IL 1 Q_ . 1 • rr Existing Coverage Without Newport Ridge en s.r.11 _ � ; 1 t t, j � ♦ } , Com.S.�4_�.�r bow ' '14 1• kit Ah .k•. M.F _ C 1�'� Sm JosQun Ntlls. r I ,SKr• _ 'L ,.Cl r , r Legend i . ,: • RSRP f RSRP Level (DL) (dBm) �=-75 I RSRP Level (DL) (dBm) ,=.85 RSRP Level (DL) (dBm) ,=-95 o 0 2_a1 `qy 40 RSRP Level (DL) (dBm) ,=-105 Confidential and proprietary material for authorized Verizon Wireless personnel only.Use,disdosure or distribution of this material is not permittee to any unauthorized persons or third parties except by wmbe�jr,�}9�,reeeement. t VERIZON(SEQUOIA)Supplemental ApPlloation(05126/2018) Proposed Coverage With Newport Ridge VeriZOnvivireless ., ,,., �� :,•.num � c ' •�•I. tea- • Y' S ; 1 Y /�-�} s7,-7�,1ry14 \+a f r J f r` .'� �s•+��x�1. •r{A� �-71'1 '% 1Lr. a' F- Y. Or 4 Legend R5RP RSRP Level (DL) (dBm) >=-75 e q RSRP Level (OL) (dBm) >=-85 RSRP Level (DL] (dBm) >=-95 x`0..2 o.a a.en�� �,.f,,.. �t -}r RSRP Level (DL) (dBm) >=-105 Confidential and proprietary matenal for authorized Venzon Wireless personnel only.Use.disclosure or distribution of this material is not permitted to any unauthorized persons or third partes except by writtennagrRreement. 2 5/2 VERIZON(SEQUOIA)Supplemental Application(06/200 Newport Ridge Coverage Only VerIZOnwimless E13JFFE % V Q C.- It FES JWIAME FKICK PES 1P PAft F2 r YON 14� Legend RSRP RSRP Level (DL) (d6m) -75 RSRP Level (DL) (dBm) >=-85 RSRP Level (DL) (dBm) -95 0,2 0.4 06.. RSRP Level (DL) (dBM) -105 Confidential and proprietary material for authorized Venzon Wireless personnel only use.disclosure of tfistribution of this material is not permitted to any unauthorized persons or thud parties except by witt"3z Ment. VERIZON(SEQUOIA)Supplemental C; 3 Attachment No. PC 7 Photographic Visual Simulations .3 g3 V� QP �P �g� � GZSXCZ 1 1 ARTISTIC N) engineering Sprint �M GAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS M O N O E U C (TREES REMOVED) AEsims.co 877.9AE.sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 � b PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS\ ©2016 Google Maps Y " LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE �J��JJ Accu RACY OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY PR �D�Y�5PLi CANT. ARTISTIC Sprint 7 8779AE sims GAS RECOVERY ■ ■ EUC (TREES REMOVEDNIC_,� Aftimscom 20662 NEWPORT COASTDRIVE NEWPORT BEACH / � '� � ...vim ..may � •_ LOCATION @2016 Google Maps / PROPOSED _ � Y aR - a,,'t-� .' di�t- 'r �� •4 ��. `�a +, � . ' ..�+'C,�•�•^ rel~ .4" r ..y r Y � Jr. » .r=. A .M h F ii„6`3 ��1 �; M� `jes Mir �iMy .. .. [ -� _ .,. �a�:d'r ♦ t_.-. f� � •y rf '�' �� ._R�", h�Ll/� •��v�'.� � hl.' ti_� � "c�•yPOh�. ♦ � � i w -y w A � y .� ' !� � '• +.+.� 'vim '� ♦ +QY 4fTrT'4M; 9 �TMr �r T F Ti'7!_ .:a`,- ':-�' �. `r' 4 ►•�, r - _as.1 ♦ ro � R �.Ok} •.. i1 ��, .•fM � - �6�!�6'��d�` 7/ f • .�r � mR'S.f ,;_ T'-'�•fT�j Z r' r 1. � � y � u- I p� - a .,.YY``att i L.., tr r .., r+ .� S �y,Fs} • N' rJ r� � gyp,. 'Nk EXISTING PROPOSED "OOKING NORTHWESTFROM • PARK ROAD • VISTA RIDGE RACCURACY OF PHOTO SIMUL-ATION BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OAD \I OG25XC21 1 ARTISTIC Sr I nt �M GAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS M O N O E U C (TREES REMOVED) AEsims com p 8779AE Sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS\ PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS\ LOCATION ©2016 Google Maps jw�J LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE AccuwACY OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY PRD � P- -ANT. \1 OS25XC21 1 ARTISTIC Sr I �t �M GAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS M O N O E U C (TREES REMOVED) AEsimscom p 8779AE Sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 i' {,.y;,l•n ( PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS ©2016 Google Maps � G r• •t •nmol r:nt •f LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROM 73 TOLL ROAD ACCURACY OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDE. RY PRO7PROPLICANT. Is a1 - ■ - ■ ■ - - ■ r I ■ Z . - -06 r •�� ti 's �, "�' I� e � a rsan�oaa onus_ �\ �' +#'�� Y.�•r�•�(, �' i / -lam � - `0` 1 s - ,• � � Y .�� �Y • I ve 11.4 LOCATION o � # •' - .:z'� �!� ,a. .� a. tea{ ♦'.t' y E • i , . j +1 \T �. ,� t � i r �. r• �-.. j}t;�� in.AY ay C� ri.'•"' y, �ry'.s ,,:k'_ � ' — �� � � '��� i � : • � � ` '��Sw i si Y is •6 ..�I,�i.N'r M,' ! �t �' ,da, - ' ; R~` a :. a'� 1' �` •� - / .� it S''^ r =� • ' ��i. >v+,4:a� xticr •C'� is � yr f• rr i. ! ; � '�:� :..� ' :,�_ ''�_` 13�5K��v�•�.��. ,Ki'^`.t ^ f"/�t�{y� , J., 1i� �'� '7^�M,.'*'A �. -c. _ .. -i k ,'n.,�.- ��� -f�i -).�,n iY 'i�• r rrJ it ' "7'�, r { v R `;. > .. ♦ '�� '� �,.A.�' �u"�ti +S.'L'v .�?�l!\�{ •] �� .i.. '•r r >.\ � `"S � 'niY '.♦ -r{. L:�+.• -.� t' n�M`�'k'l� ��/. } yti "�" 1 `S• „\i.' ♦ � •� r.e-. .A - a'/! .� 4 C y � b1 r ,5,,.'� � � r+ :'.��'•^,,'•.7�t`t. 1 . �� �1 ����Qle,�ad.y 2�.J1J� _tR``> �V� u.' 1• t r 1 t•!, �,+ + 1_ •~ N S ♦ r � aCr . ,.1 .L :\ `� � 1.R'� ♦:�� h•k ., y N9• Fc�'-ar}T:ta'a �.! !.. . y• 'r �'�R - :1 n o ''4 4+� •7" i .��'4''r � j k N1 �.,. ' '� a�i e l a�` -`V,,. _ ' ' .L'• i, ;..' �.w .a�f•'v}1 ' ,� -1•, �►i�'.y�p't!_� \j�,�`f��{�1.� �Y. 5 V I`,'•y' �`C �n,..i�� � ;�� �� .+{&r}lu^i ..t rbq< . ��ja- r .i`, �,• � +,..+�"1. v 'y,,�T.�i '��'� �CZ'l:,'.y`"�`Y s:` ' r��.�•.'� �-.t.�'`\:`'QIT .:,j Fal j±.`Y�E: '� {. '.,a '-q-..- �ai�c 4 1 r'.: t r. •'- ' • r 'N � '' �y r.�. r.` � .^V 1' �\: a'� � �4 'a:. ti - .. . ..� ..,(r:, b .. •. . . � a •. ��-_ ;•-. +Ift... : F.S{o-. _ y.. EXISTING - PROPOSED • • • - - • - • 1 _ r � GZSXCZ 1 1 (,CAT'STCRI �l ngineerinSprint �MGAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS MONOEUC ( 5 YEAR GROWTH) AEsims.com 877.9AE.sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS \ H LANDSCAPING ©2016 Google Maps /PROPOSED _ so© a,,,��.. LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE Accu RACY OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED JFON INFORMATION PROVIDED eY Pao0/��®PUCANT. N) jEAT'STC engineerin1 GAS Sprint Tm 8779AE.sims RECOVERY SYSTEMS M ■ ■ GROWTH) 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 1 @2016 Google Maps PROPOSED MONDELICALYPTUS PROPOSED LAND CAPING .. ILI g, ".:r A r*. .�i�el_v:$� � •i"Le�iq �1M: + ��-t � ` r� + rr r 'fGi►f4� � e�. � ... � .R i h it� �py��� _ �' � .. ,[[cc``GGYY ♦ ♦� ! s w .y w 4 r-�"R. � �L .��--y��r,.��t �� ^� !A ,� fir` ^♦ �e• • �� rr'r���� y�q � � ' s�?� �j yam' i!i / • :�r � mR'S.f ,; T'-'�•s,T�j Z r' r 1. � M y � � I �"� } �t° � a 4a )�.`S`• �t, �?.../e ut�af k M , ml \ '1 'ij Y` i .t' �;.. . Y �j S �' • i '� •m /J, r� l �r? �pn "i EXISTING PROPOSEDLOOKING NORTHWESTFROM • PARK ROAD • VISTA RIDGE ROAD � GZSXCZ 1 1 (,CAT'STCRI �l ngineerinSprint �MGAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS MONOEUC ( 5 YEAR GROWTH) AEsims.com 877.9AE.sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 y- : 1 PROPOSED MDNOEUCALYPTUS\ PROPOSED MONDEUCALYPTUS ©2016 Google Maps PROPOSED LANDSCAPING jw � r�r r i � � 3 LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE Accu RACY OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED By 1B.319, P�icAry T. ARTISTIC GAS S p r i nt RECOVERY SYSTEMS MONOEUCYEAR ■ 20662 NEWPORT COASTDRIVE NEWPORT BEACH 1 t r 4 1 . . PROPOSED LOCATION @2016 .I: t , I - - - it,.- .. . -'•. ` 1 EXISTING PROPOSEDLoOKINr. SOUTHWEST • • ROAD ACCURACY OF PHOTO SIMUL-ATION BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED Y ;?,J:- ' ' . _ ■ ■ _ _ ■ Z . - ol :.ySj, 4 I 0.- 1 �wl ��' _ LOCATION o r ::ate". r • � • a , _ It is- 61 ) t y f . l 't �'�� i r � r. a �5 i;�� i n � ,,y, Lt,. ... y..•L,(r�� �a�'„^� '��?Ei, '�i"1 `���+1i��..r. ��f .'�'3' , • p: J Jt I'M j $ • ru�'Y �5�+ sN _: Yn Y ,M1 y} j' '�'\ PROPOSED LANDSCAPING 4 - fj r , It ��d 7"W7.7"f• r,'r..�. r - Ire '7�+ -).l,v iY \� r rrJ tt ' :;. Y ♦ �'{ v ,R ):..a > r. r+: ♦l.; �fi li()59 I! ,I \ I+�Sn � t�i+v .T +tll`l '] '>tl' r• y� r . ;x•.. .a ;: t :Z ''r ' '�} :tM't'tir,VW < .\ ,�/� 11}+ ,�•rw, 1 Y t r I I'll t `� rY' Al) 1 .\iia'�ai'i '�^\'![t�61%ln�'y�.;i,: w' 1b.' " -r � ri 1 (, bf t ' q. • M. S `'. ft `. . '.7d j�v ..l '�"� ., �la•�NCa�YII'� +Y�1� ! � :' r- `:'t _ tA. y ..j a a .aC, ♦ •�.^4Rti -'eFT�a`n •.! !' ' .ti' I :(� - y4 oY .'4 4+ ��- i �,. r4,[' ♦ •� j Y.1 a�a, 1 ,�' ' t i e l \'. yty" t-}.* - ' ' .L" .a� . � �. �.ti n �'y1'1��c ,� ,�y1•, �6�'.yyp't �\�' �J \ Y. 5 y,�lyy' ��C �q,•:� \.'�� '^' ' .. -a.`&+71u^i .t tbq, .'t`a'i„a `r"" y ��• - V • L,. `- V L,-. I- J'a �CZ'1:.•.y` Y r v.��.' �L�'a\ `'QIT .:�j F�1� .`Y�E: .\ i,i, -ti- v...r\t -ta e'.: �. r 1. • a 'yJ' �t.. zly.R . .ti •��,n\ '�\: .`` 4 i' ti \I OG25XC21 1 ARTISTIC Sr I nt �M GAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS M O N O E U C ( FULL MATURITY) AEsims com p 8779AE Sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 r � , I I Y' • PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS\ _ .[z.+'• �., - PROPOSED LANDSCAPING LANDSCAPING /PROPOSED©2016 Google Maps v _ Y V "Ron -<:-w�77 ,1 1. A L PROPOSED LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE AccuwACY OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED JFON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY PRD:R�9.51LI.aNT. N) (CAT'STC engineerin1 GAS Sprint Tm 8779AE.sims RECOVERY SYSTEMS M ■ ■ MATURITY) 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA - 26571 @2016 Google Maps PROPOSED MONDEUCALYPTUS PROPOSED LANDSCAPING .. MI 1 1������ y �C �'.+'.�• ••r:� /ice" -.nA r .a i :.- � ^l O. .. :� '•� ._� a� _ , �`,',�� k�� � • �T ' f ..a:�Ca �� 4 .� ,'�.^'? a•:� ? _ � ,4 -r ��.. £ Asa -g, .r.. A l.V' Fi'6`l"+:$1 ` 'M�"Leliq �iM •. \�.t � � f� `,y�y ��. 'FA:i►f4� � .�+.�� e � �• .R T w nh it� ��� � �` _•_ac'aIR�'/n` � . ,[[ccs-�GY'GY t �� ,.�� `�. 16'�� �'rXY^. 'e• . •'�� iw•'r����M* *. `. . _ _ � i�e�' y'^ ' �•'� f �41..� 'l ' - '��i'�� ri•Ik►i�.�i-.R» �.. 'A AYt. •` v ` � ^or.; ':-�' " tti,:r - - -as.1 • ro � f � Ows} •.. it - � rM^• M '¢�• +� "� i • y� k � yip y �R � �' yp -�• s R'� 4:f j,'as.yli Se'. �/ .� � L w' ♦ +b". • k +►` � e' i M - fty���� ^ �'�.nrY"lc'dAir,r �' .. �/r��:z-�Yi _. �". t •F ., { ♦ � �, f EXISTING I—OOKINr. NORTHWESTFROM • PARK ROAD • VISTA RIDGE ROAD � GZSXCZ 1 1 (,CAT'STCRI �l ngineering Sprint �MGAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS MONOEUC ( FULL MATURITY) AEsims.co877.9AE.sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 y- : 1 PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS\ PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS ROPDSED LANDSCAPING ©2016 Google Maps L'. r i � ski � 3 LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE AccuRAC. OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED JFON INFORMATION PROVIDED By IS --�-q)�--PU-ANT. \1 OG25XC21 1 AgTeSTIC� S GAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS M O N O E U C ( FULL MATURITY) AEsims.co r I �t �M m p 877.9AE.sims 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657 e 1 PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS PROPOSED LANDSCAPING PROPOSED LANDSCAPING • • ©2016 Google Maps t: IvLm e ? -VID :nt - • - • • LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROM 73 TOLL ROAD �J Accu RACY OF PHOTO SIMULATION BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED ev f•ao�["r/(P U.ANT. ' ' • — ■ — ■ ■ • — I )L�SdO Jddd`d HIIS_F `� /, � \\\ 'a'r +YN.. '3� `�� ` ., ♦�"_f. yo � v , t , `SII t ,pw`• yj.�• � r 1` .w��� � �1 I _ .jam - k eft • M 4 I �w`1 _ LOCATION o { g { t y A * _ �' - • t' r • •• .fes Y ) e Y • !tr �� k +t}•. a j... �. A+' � M _ .r ..� j:. Jv It?,�1� • FSA.� fir.: f� 1� .o�.r F �1.G�v v ��^�y- . . a. :� .1 ,- :,,y ` Y 9' ! a '' <� •n'nff ...r{ K•,T,. 1` T �.uw`{ .... - ;: ._ �:� ! r� 1 ;W .,• _ ,Ry t �.. _ .P •k "' ,6- PROPOSED LANDSCAPING Y fj '41 0- ft v ✓ YY Ar V .i'ti lY 1\ •' � 1. (• f Ar • , \, .�.�+ , M t�•. \�. ..�1•j �eK t lir .1 7wt+�,- -" _ 1 N M..,(,- �r 'f�i -).l,n �Y \: Y -i J.. It "7'� ♦ { v R `i..� } ♦- r�: al.:�f' 3' � -w7 ,\3li..l+�5n .th� !�>,'ti�t -• 1'�1,.: ` 5 +' - y' ! ♦ ;.r.. '.♦ ;•: �,{ {'+' `V ,tM+''!.'ti..v�' .\ j/, 1tij�'��-.:y:"t,' Si „\4 .��� -•y ,.:,�. ( - ...\ \ \"S I 1 Y I. r.l c.. ♦' �` rQ Al\a1 .\1 ',` y.t�*(y•yQl6✓t:'.d �.`t.;•J�. _t �V' w' 1l.' 1• r i s (. bf r ' .0.�"1 •�. N S , ' f .•, '.7d j�v .,,1 ryi `�1•�II��Y(j` 1\. k Yyl t. . 4. '�• meg.r(..1 p� 1:' ! •-'t _ tA•. 4 ..1 ♦ t , K ♦ p ,y':.1��\ .`w.\.\aR . \ ,.9` FIs,�','+'FT.�wnh.\\ '.! !.. , yI �'� - :1 Y o .r`4`' 4+ ., r c '�" :4•'t'• ` ij �1 ��•♦, 1 ,�' t v• Cyt \''. \• �.�.�J1.•�^j,��R�f''yv�}. fl,y,��•� !►�M'.yyp'-�_1�\ * •�1.� `�;. Y• 5 `I(Is�'• �`C �q..ia \n\\ l �:&�t w^!9..- .4q° `�e� 't � •,.: t't.', .• •�. - � ` ♦ 'YJ' ��e '• �! "�zl Y,R �'i.,:..� .��' \ �\: . Y � � 4 a ti ,- V� QP �P goo Attachment No. PC 8 Project Plans -4-01 V� QP �P �o� PA2016-061 Attachment No. PC 8 - Project Plans REV DATEIBY DESCRIPTION 6 6s/65/Is 16EM- fl cRc `1r UN OERGROUNO SERVICE \ ALERT Of SOUTHERN CALIrO RNIA • Call: CTOLL FREE 811 ENGINEER/CONSULTANT Sprint SITE NAME: GAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS - TEMP RELO SFTE BUILDER SPRINT SITE NUMBER : OG99XT21 I Sprint AT&T SITE NUMBER : LAR054 330 Cam merce. Sidle 106 Irvi�e. CA 92602 ADDRESS : 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92657 A&E DEVELOPMENT SITE TYPE : RAWLAND O DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AME SERVICES 3550 E OIICA 51x881 Y250 PROPERTY OWNER: SPRINT ON SPRINT IS SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION FOR A ZONING PERMIT AND ALL OTHER RELATED SHEET DESCRIPTIN area.cesmrme ,321 p 14 1211-6404 1114)ia3-4441 T°. COUNTY OF ORANGE NAME. JEAN-PHILIPPE (JF) BARAN APPROVALS FOR THE. T-1 TITLE SHEET 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE PHONE714.231 3684 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92657 EMAIL: jean-philippe.bomn®sprin6com 'SPRINT' INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING C-1 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SITE DEVELOPMENT CONTACT: ELI ESBER PHONE: 714.834 4105 POWER COMPANY: 60'-0" HIGH TEMPORARY MONOPOLE ON A 8'x8,5' CONCRETE BALLAST PLATFORM C-2 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON (SCE) (2) PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON THE (P) TEMPORARY MONOPOLE O PHONE: 800.655.4555 ((2) RRHS MOUNTED ON THE (P) TEMPORARY MONOPOLE A-1 SITE PLAN S SPPRRINTINT BOB A_• (1) MICROWAVE DISH ANTENNA WITH (1) DEC ON THE (P) TEMPORARY MONOPOLE 2 EXISTING EN LARGED SITE PLAN 330 COMMERCE, SUITE 100 MV BROADER: 'AT&T' INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING (REFERENCE ONLY): A-3 NEW ENLARGED SITE PLAN DEVELOPMENT SERVICES � IRVINE, CA 92602 AT&T PHONE: 888.944.0447 (6) PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON THE (P) TEMPORARY MONOPOLE A-4 TEMPORARY MONOPOLE LOCATION A.E..-I,All-1 RASO APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE' 2) RRUS MOUNTED ON THE (P) TEMPORARY MONOPOLE 11',Caumrma 92321 G • (2) OC-6 MOUNTED ON THE (P) TEMPORARY MONOPOLE A-5 SPRINT ANTENNA & EQUIPMENT PLAN, RF CONFIGURATION I214F29-8464 (714)333-4441 1x. ao CORE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES (1) 2FT MICROWAVE ON THE (P) TEMPORARY MONOPOLE A_6 AT&T ANTENNA PLAN & RF CONED. (FOR REF. ONLY) .»u,_ame.ce.com 3350 E. BIRCH STREET )(250 (1) MICROWAVE MOUNT o AREA, CA 92821 • (2) ODU's A-] ELEVATIONS SITE INFORMATION CONTACT: JULIA PAUSES (4) 1-5/8" COAX CABLES JONOOIN H1115 k0 3 PHONE: 714729.8404 (6) FIBER CABLES SITE NAME SNN ITE . (2) 3/16" TRANSMISSION LINES GAS RECOVERY PRO PERN INFORMATION- JURISDICTION: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SYSTEMS - TEMP RELO IuOR11-i'' CURRENT ZONING DB OPEN SPACE PROJECT DESCRIPTION �� APA 478-031-71 SITE CASCADE (E) CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V (E) BUILDING OCCUPANCY: N/A SPRINT:OG99XT211 OTo33' 36'MAP LONGITUDE 31T4293° W ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE AT&T: LAR054 WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LPD! GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERU SITE ADDRESS: WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES: 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE START OUT FROM THE 'SPRINT' OFFICE IN IRVINE. NEWPORT BEACH,CA 9265/ • 2013 CALIF. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE • 2013 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CCM` • TAKE EXCHANGE TO EL CAMINO REAL N (INCL. TITLES 24 & 25) • TIA-222-G STANDARD ORANGE COUNTY • HEAD SOUTHEAST ON COMMERCE TOWARD EXCHANGE • 2013 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODES LOCAL BUILDING CODES • TURN LEFT ONTO EXCHANGE • 2013 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODES • CITY/COUNTY ORSINI I, SHEET TITLE • TURN LEFT AT THE IST CROSS STREET ONTO EL CAMINO REAL • 2013 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODES TAKE CULVER DR TO NEWPORT COAST DR IN NEWPORT BEACH 2013 CALFOZA PLUMBING CODES • TURN RIGHT AT THE 15T CROSS STREET ONTO EL CAMINO REAL N PR0JCT INFORMATION 203 CAUFORNA FIRE CODES • USE THE RIGHT 2 LANES TO TURN RIGHT AT THE ZEN CROSS STREET ONTO TURN RIGHT ONTO CULVER DR CODE COMPLIANCE • CONTINUE ONTO BONITA CANYON DR ARCHITECT.- USE THE LER 2 LANES TO TURN LEFT ONTO NEWPORT COAST DR CORE DEVELOPMENT SERwC`_E TITLE SHEET MAKE A U-TURN DESTINATION WILL BE ON THE RIGHT AT 20662 NEWPORT COAST OR 3350 E BIRCH STREET )(250 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92657 AREA, CA 82821 DO NOT icA LE DRAUV..\. CONTACT: STEVEN M. RAMON PHONE: 714329.8404 CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT AND/OR SHEET NUMBER ENGINEERS IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANrIES BEFORE °ROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME. DRIVING DIRECTIONS CONSULTING TEAM CONTRACTOR NOTES SHEET INDEX T-1 PA�016-061 Attachment No. PC 8 - Project Plans REV DATEIBV DESCRIPTION 6 93/05/16 IN%ZDa APN: 478-031-63 ENGINEER I CONSULTANT RAWIAND SITE BUILDER APN: 478-031-68 y/ '�—(E) RAwIAND� �T Sprint Irvine. LamT2196 ' 2p NIC CLA A 92660622 x,b n (F) A TWA -(E) POLE, (E) FIBER POC I A&E DEVELOPMENT (E) FIBER FEED TO (E) (E) RAWLAND--, O TELCO CABINET, APPRO% 880' �4�1 (P) 'SPRINT' TEMPORARY \\\�/\ % \ ® �q ;oRq DevELAae sERv cES Ices 1\ MONOPOLE LOCATION % ` :6 "'�/ 3319 e..Rm 311--IHS _ )\\\ \�` • `` y RRa Cellla1rvla 92321 ^ \�A 12Ad Tl'1-9www (7141uv333TP44t lez r / •n 22• AOE) ACCESS GATE A\` `\ / �f� SITE OEVELCPMENT f �- �- LIJIS oiTJ\ � DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1\ a /• /, / ` J ,`\ OV 7 ;/ 3359 E...en 311-1#11, Al /7 Sere Cal(o•na 9RB21 1`\\vv /• /' (E) ANTENNA TYP BaOG (111)9.-4441(ex _ A (BY OTHERS) A,�'• SITE INFORMATION SITE Ni \ (E) vERrzoN wIRE�ss' \ ®� O \ GAS RECOVERY RENWNEN SHELTER To NPo c m o \,/ SYSTEMS - TEMP RELO (ew nT&Y EaulPueNr (E) 'SPRINT' SITE CASCADE: i SHELTER TO REM ) e SPRINT:OG99XT211 �(E) RAWIAND� �Fi �' -- � �Y'¢ ANTENNA AREA T 2 AT&T: LAR054 ;v v� :L_..�. (E) LIVE TREE, IYP. A-g SITE ADDRESS: Rib 0��/,,,yyy'... O d/V1 28882 NEWPORT COAST DRIVEy4Ya, NEWPORT BEACH,CA 9285/ �l j®* � / ,q� ORANGE COUNTY � �, IG SHEET TITLE i P (E) 'SPRINT' �s EQUIPMENT AREA i ° SITE PLAN �(E) RAWIANO--� SHEET NUMBER A-1 SITE PLAN eR r-ea'-9' o aoS. 1sD 1 -40.4 J PAr2016-061 Attachment No. PC 8 - Project Plans REV DATEBY DESCRIPTION \� p o6/o5/Is ICUB zW B (E) ACCESS GATE - ; (E) PROPANE \ - TANK TO REMAIN \' - ENGINEER I CONSULTANT (E) LEG BLOWER AND FLARES TO BE REMOVED O 12'-0° WIDE TSERVICE ROAD c� (E) C -., TVP. 6 \i= (E) AIR COMMPRESSOR TO REMAIN " / - (E) ELECTRICAL PANEL �PARKING� SITE BUILDER TO REMAIN � x � (E) NATURAL (E) USC AV.. (E) ELECTRICAL MANHOLES CONNECTION TO REMAIN '- F (E) LIVE TREE, iYP. CONDUITS / ,AND CMU WALL TO REMAIN Sprint D PIPE= v / (E) TRAILER STALL TO BE REMOVED (E) MAIN TRANSFORMERsaD IrvIrvine. CA 96022los AND GENERATOR � BREAKER TO REMAIN a E SHOP BOLDING - A&E DEVELOPMENT BE REMOVED (E) AMBIENT - - o II VAPORIZER PN TO BE REMOVED DEVELOPMENT SERVICES (E) FIREWALL TO E SERVICES B BE REMOVED O TRANSFORMERS ssss E.slrcns rozso (E) PANEL TOO REMAINO oo O area cam sz ANTENNASNNAS MOUNTED TO O p+apzsezi waaW eO va (E) CMU WALL TO REMAIN (E) WASTE (E) EMERGENCY NEUTRALIZATION TANK SITE DEVELOPMENT (E) YERIZDN WIRELESS' PANEL GENERATOR TO CONTROL TO REMAIN ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO (E) REMAIN BUILDING CMU WAIL TO REMAIN ��(E) EQUIPMENT ppp REMAIN AREA BE (E) CIRCULATING WATER - , V (E) 'VERIZON WIRELESS' E //i REMOVED PUMPFIRE PUMP SKIP T AND COOLING TOWERS 10 EDUIPMENT SHELLER TO REMAIN /i�/ \\ 0 BE REMOVED /jOg DEVELOPMENT SERVICES /%/j VAV SPk�S!1+MVtd s�sB e.cai mm a-xerso EQUIPMENT SHELTER TO REMAIN - // T O '10 PUNxB•• aaat fax ww. re.us.com (E) 'SPRINT P)WFR __ _ RUN WITHIN (F) 5'-C" (E) 'SPRINT' SITE INFORMATION WIDE PRECAST 7R7NCH (E) BOILER BE PANEL ANTENNAS PIPE sire uAMe REMOVED MOUNTED TO (E) CMU GAS RECOVERY WALL TO REMAIN (E) 'SPRINT POWER I -,C Al / SYSTEMS - TEMP RELO CONTROL BUILDING TO REMAIN E SITE CASCADE: O T SPRINT:OG99XT211 EL (E) 'SPRINT ELECTRICAL CONDUIT MOUNTED ON THE - AT&T: LAR054 r OUTSIDE OF (E) GMU WALLS �—(E) SPRINT' WALL MOUNTED CABLE TRAY TO REMAIN SITE ADDRESS FE) EXHAUST IOWEY TO 20362 TCOAST CRIME R-1,MSENEWPORT BEACH, CA9267 _ (E) SPRINT' AND 'AT&T- PANEL ORANGE COUNTY ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON ED( SHEET TITLE TOWER TO BE RELOCATED o (E) '+BRIZON' AND T-MOBILE PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON EXISTING DRAUST TOWER AND EQUIPMENT - TO BE RELOCATED / ENLARGED SITE (E) -r-MOBILE' CONTROL o PLAN PANEL TO REMAIN (E) 'SPRINT' EQUIPMENT (E) ACCESS GATE SHEET NUMBER LEASE AREA TO REMAIN q5 A-2 EXISTING ENLARGED SITE PLAN S 1 oe rza'-s' 0 1; 405 J PAr2016-061 Attachment No. PC 8 - Project Plans REV DATHBY DESCRIPTION 0 00/05/16 IOOA IDa. a CRC OAS- (E) ACCESS GAIL � w�. (E) PROPANE W -_.a - z �o t'6./.� TANK TO REMAIN tiy'N �O ON* L\9 ENGINEER I CONSULTANT NtF ROAD (E) ELECTRICAL . PANEL TO REMAIN (E) CMU WALL TVP - \ `"(P) WERIZON' &T-MOBILE W/CELL (E) AIR COMMPPE<_SOR �/ BLOCKS TEMPORARY MONOPOLE & TO REMAIN >B �' O AC FONDATION (Bt'OTHERS) SITE BUILDER E (E) NATURAL / (P)TEMPORARY 6FT HIGH CONNECTION TO REMAIN (E) U/G CHAN-LINK FENCE BY OTHERS E LIVE TREE, TPP. CoITS / ( ) ( > Sprint AND PIPES > a. , PARANG� 0 (P) 'SPRINT' &AT&T BO'-0' HIGH (E) MAIN TRANSFORMER 390 commerce. suite too .�.,' TEMPORARY MONOPOLE ON Bk6'x5' AND GENERATOR Irvine CA 92602 - &„ CONCRETE BALLAST PLATFORM I BREAKER TO REMAIN AN ELECTRICAL MANHOLES A_5 ANO CMU WALL TO REMAIN A&E DEVELOPMENT (P) WOO' xO' PERMANENT GENERATOR ENCLOSURE (BY OTHERS) 4`Ahe O b (P) 'VERIZON' &T-MOBILE �a �\� PERMANENT MONOPOLE (BY OTHERS) DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 ) A&E SERVICES " (P) T-MOBBE' Ei E) TRANSFORMERS - (E) 'AT&T' PANEL ANTENNAS EPERMANENTNCLOSURE EQUIPMENT TO REMAIN - aa6o E uilcllrec1925o Bree.Cal r,.1a 92821 PIPE MOUNTED To E CMU ENCLOSURE (BY OTHERS) (E) WASTE A plal'r25weawoaonal0`3eaal ea. O 0 NEUTRALIZATION TANK w or. =-em WALL TO REMAIN TO REMAIN _ W 7 _ E VERIZON WIRELESS' PANEL (E) EMERGENCY (E) SUE DEVELOPMENT ( ) GENERATOR TO CONTROL ANTENNAS PIPE MOUNTED TO REMAIN BUILDING (E) CMU WALL TO REMAIN TO REMAIN (E) 'VERIZON WIRELESS' "V i _p EQUIPMENT SHELTER TO REMADE) AT&T EQUIPMENT / //// 5P�"O PCU DEVELOPMENTN?� B,raaClorAna 9R021o0 Y A2] SHELTER TO REMAIN 'L (9 o O / pup21 noon U1a)989 anal rea www c re r coin i (E) SPRINT POWER ] - % RUN WITHIN (E) 5-O" _ PAN'SPRINT' AS PIPE sITe NAme SITE INFORMATION �j AIDE PRECAST FRENCH GAS RECOVERY MOUNTED ALL TO REEMAN) CMU r� (E( SPRINT POWER P 0 AT SYSTEMS - TEMP RELO �O (E) MCCA WITHIN (E) BUILDING— L A-5 SITE CASCADE: RICA SPRINT:OG99XT211 IS) 'SPRINT E-ECTo v cuTsmE MO (jLCMUNwnu AT&T: LAR054 �Jp�4 (F) SPRINT' WALL MOUNTED CABLE TRAY TO REMAIN SITE ADDRESS: 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE N�J NEWPORT BEACH,CA 9269 ORANGE COUNTY SHEET TITLE AI] (E) 'T-MOBILE CONTROL NEW ENLARGED PANEL TO REMAIN - SITE PLAN o (EJ ACCESS TE-= PPERMANRENT ONO-EUCAPYPNSIGH G q (E) 'SPRINT' EQUIPMENT o SHEET NUMBER A-5 LEASE AREA T0.REMAIN A-3 NEW ENLARGED SITE PLAN SCALE 1 I'=ID'-a' 0 10 2D' PO 400 00 1 PA�016-061 Attachment No. PC 8 - Project Plans REV DATNBY DESCRIPTION NOTES: 0 OB COR5/16 IQOA IDX. I, EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY PIPES AND _ CONDUITS TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE LOCATION AND DEPTH TO BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD. (P) VERIZON' & T-MOBILE W1 CELL BLOCKS ENGINEER I CONSULTANT TEMPORARY MONOPOLE & FONDATION (BY OTHERS) �—(P)TEMPORARY 6R HIGH CHAN-UNK FENCE (BY OTHERS) SITE BUILDER ---®A E (P)TEMPORARY COAX CABLE TRAY, o rETECANEL - APPROX. 751 (BY OTHERS) Sprint \ 330 Commerce. 2`62 100 (E) ELEG Irvine. C 0za0z MANHOLE, TOP. l A&E DEVELOPMENT ®d242�M/Cg01Yg1,(=- TI '(I (P) 'SPRINT' 8 AT&T 601 HIGH I 4V TEMPORARY MONOPOLE ON 8'x8'x5'Eu CONCRETE BALLAST PLATFORM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ASIE SERVICES 74'-8' i'i li ilii 8'-0" X350 E..1,h10-1x2. �(P) TEMPORARY 6FI HIGH CHAN-UNK Dr..,cn0mrnia 92821 ACCESS GATES (TOTAL OF 2 LOCATIONS) (7+4)'729-0404 (M)X3-4441 Imo (BY OTHERS) ...cord. no. (E) AIR COMMPRESSOR _AJgT SECTOR li 3 TO REMAIN - 0 126 AZIMUM SUE DEVELOPMENT -SPR � RINTMICRG J AZIMUTH E NATURAL( ) NATUR E BOLLARD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES O TIM. CONNECTION TO REMAIN 1VP __� ti 3350E.-A ..X260 - AI� (P) 'YERRON' 8'x10' aca rccrna 0zrroaz+ -- (714(729 4 .1413X3 4441 Ina PRESSURE HE) WATER _ PERMANENT GENERATOR .. -84D rccccom II ��TT ENCLOSURE (BY OTHERS) 'SPRINT' SECTOR 1 VALVE, TVP_ J SITE INFORMATION AbMi 'VERIZON' &T-MOBILE SITE NAME: O (E) WATER I; PERMANENT MONOPOLE (BY OTHERS) GAS RECOVERY POSTIN OICATOR VALVE, o ALVE' P.� SYSTEMS - TEMP RELO _ _ (P) T—MOBILE' III a', ----- PERMANENT EQUIPMENT SIM CASCADE: AND CMT WALL TONREM --- - - _ ENCLOSURE (BY OTHERS) SPRINT:OG99XT211 (E) ELECTRICAL MARTI (E) LEG r.as PIPE o' AT&T: LAR054 MAIN (E) ABOVE (E) U/G _ - - _--— GROUND PIPE PIPES,ttP. 3� --- - _.-- -- - -- - _-_-_- O _.-- __ _ _ _ _._ - _ 61TE ADDRESS: � --- ---- --- ¢ 20862 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE --- - - -- --------� �' (E) 12'-0" HIGH NEWPORT BEACH,CA 9285/ ' � CMU WALL �(E) 18"0 U/G (E) 'SPRINT' WALL MOUNTED PIPE --- --- ORANGE COUNTY CABLE TRAY TO REMAIN (P) JOINT COAX - --- -- SHEET TULLE STUP-UB CONDUIT E (P) U/G COAX JOINT PERMANET (E) 30'0 CONC. TRENCH, APPROX. 34'-0-. SEE NOTE 1 U/G DUCT BANK PE)NE MTET(E)CMURWAHL TEMPORARY A, _ — MONOPOLE LOCATION —0" s'—o" I� I (E) 'AT&T SHELTER E - LE) vERIzoN SHELTER (E) 'vERrzoN cLR. ANTENNAS ANTENNAS SHEET NUMBER A-4 TEMPORARY MONOPOLE LOCATION I/e'=YLE-0' 1 J PA�016-061 Attachment No. PC 8 - Project Plans REV SAMMY DESCRIPTION NOTE: 1. (P) MONOPOLE, (P) ANTENNAS SHALL BE PALMED D _VOLlwix 2Da TO MATCH (E) SURROUNDINGS. (P) ANTENNA STAND-OFF ARM ANTENNA AND RED CONFIGURATION �. (BY VALMONT, MODEL # MM02) TECHNOLOGY AZIMUTH RAD CENTER ANTENNA MARE -ENNA..OIL EI£CT. MEGH. J OF xRIT RAH MODEL M OF M-B4Np FCS FRN ®i`g' C4 illi 1115 COMBINER COMBINER MODEL �,�[�,O A 1BOD TDP A➢lNF1&12x<-t2P nAxlem 4xu - - ,y (P) TRI-BRACKET ANTENNA ENGINEER I CONSULTANT SI MIS to 4 1 sszlxz SUPPORT(BY VALMONT) (P) 'SPRINT MOUNTED TO PP) BEtT'M9]E 1 BI IN-BM'D FACS RRx ANTENNA MOUNTED In (P) TEcxrvOLOGY AZIMUTH RAD cExrER AHIENMaVANE Au1ErvNA wPML DLT MV d DE RAH RE wocEL cow81NER COMBINER MODEL PIPE MOUNT, TYP. (TOTAL-2) 1901) ]U 22-0 ITS 1PXV3E`RRI1C-A20 2 0 h,Ihl•x l _ _ - TUNFNOLBCY AEMETx IUD CENTER AN 1.MANE —a-wWFL EUOT. MECH. �Di RRH RRA MODEL ✓t OF 1N-&WD PCs PRN (P) 'SPRINT MICROWAVE TILT MLT LOMSWR COMBINER MODEL (P) 'SPRINT' 7900MHz RRH DISH ODU (TOTAL-1) 1900 237 1 RIs AP1NT1di12x-D-1203 D I RAH19O0 _ _ MOUNTED BEHIND (P) 4x45 55MHz ANTENNA,TYP (TOTAL-2) - SITE BUILDER (P) 'SPRINT' 14.0 p21MUTH qA0 CENTER AN2NINMAI'.E ANTINNA MODEL B OI LOU ARH MODEL - ' 'T - MICROWAVE DISH `TOTAL-1) i37 Si 111 set-2anNIPr 1 AL w i y0000 (P) 'SPRINT & 'AT&T' 60'-0' HIGH Sprint TEMPORARY MONOPOLE ON 8' x B' x 5' CONCRETE BALLAST PLATFORM OR% \y(4, 330 Commerce. Sidle 100 �a, .�R� , Irvine CA 92002 NEW TRANSMISSION LINES (SECTOR 1 & 3) j� N" P, AIDS DEVELOPMENT TWE COANn11' SIZE LENGTH V OEM I 5/e• -47'40 M96EIX 2 1-I/4' *47W • O DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ASOE SERVICES RF CONFIGURATION 13 (P) 'SPRINT' ANTENNA PLAN (SECTOR 1 & 3 ) D „ D- D 1 3D E..,,.a B areal.2. area,Cnlllomla 92021 ()14),29-B4c4 (714)333-4441 lar ua nom 15'-0" www.core (E) 'SPRINT' EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE SITE DEVELOPMENT O (E) SUB PANEL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 3D10 E,BEc1T Slem.250 (E) TRANSFORMER ON iE (E) ONO WALL III arae Oal bm a 33-11 4),33 0404 p14MO ' Tax RAISED CONCRETE PAD www n_are. (E) 'CLEABWIRECABINET SITE INFORMATION MOUNTED ON RAISED (E) 'SPRINT' POWER PANEL CONCRETE PAD (TO REMAIN) El (E) EMPTY PIPE MOUNT, TYP. SIM NAME: RECOVERY (E) 'SPRINT' TELCO PANEL SYSTEMS - TEMP RELO z (E) SPOOL BOX SITE cnsuos: s a (E) 'SPRINT' 8927 T _ (E) COAX CABLE TRAY SPRINT:QG99XT211 a MMBTS CABINET (E) 'CLERWIRE' PANEL 2� AT&T: LAR054 ANTENNA MOUNTED TO (E) Sfii�N PIPE MOUNT TO REMAIN R\cF;'L\M�� E_ y P= (E) GPS ANTENNA, TYR. (TOTAL-2) SP TQ P SITE APOAEss: (E) 'SPRINT BOECv2 , _ BATTERY NT' 60E (E) 'CLERWIRE' PANEL DAP 20882 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE _ (E) FIBER D-BOX UNIT MOUNTED TO (E) PIPE NEWPORT BEACH,CA 9285' ZS (E) RAISED CONCRETE ------ MOUNT TO REMAIN ORANGE COUNTY EQUIPMENT PAD (E) 'SPRINT' 190OMH2 PANEL ANTENNA MOUNTED TO (E) PIPE MOUNT TO SHEET TITLE REMAIN (TOTAL-,)(SECTOR 21 (E) CMU WALL SPRINT ANTENNA (E) CONCRETE PAD (E) POWER CABINET MOUNTED PLAN, RF ON (E7 RAISED CONCRETE PAD �(E) 'sPRINT 190OMHZ RRH CONFIGURATION MOUNTED TO (E) PIPE MOUNT TO REMAIN (TOTAL-1)(SECTOR z) AND EQUIPMENT (E) WALL MOUNTED CABLE MAY PLAN /\ (E) 'SPRINT' WALL SHEET NUMBER i MOUNTED CABLE TRAY (E) ACCESS GATES A-5 (E) 'SPRINT' EQUIPMENT PLAN ,7;.`_1L1 D 2. 4 (E) 'SPRINT' ANTENNA PLAN (SECTOR 2) DR „ ",,"D. a I 2 2 4Gc> J PAr2016-061 Attachment No. PC 8 - Project Plans NOTE. (P) 'AT&T' RRUS 12 MOUNTED REV DATEIBY DESCRIPTION I. (P) MONOPOLE, (P) ANTENNAS SHALL BE PAINTED 4 BEHIND (P) ANTENNA, TP. (TOTAL-2) ° oe c°5x/1s 1.Mot TO MATCH (E) SURROUNDINGS_ gUI (BY OTHERS) cA/?' (P) 'AT&T W-0" PANEL ANTENNA e\>. C MOUNTED ON 'SPRINT 61 TEMPORARf MONOPOLE,TYP. •eNb (TOTAL-4)(BY OTHERS) .gyp ENGINEER I CONSULTANT `G. (P) 'AT&V RRUS 11 MOUNTED (P) 'AT&T'ANTENNA ' - BEHIND (P) ANTENNA, TYP. (TOTAL-4) MOUNT (BY VALMONT) (BY OTHERS) (P) 'AT&T 2FT MICROWAVE - AT SBFT RAD CENTER (P) ODU BELOW (P) 2FT MICROWAVE SITE BUILDER (TOTAL-2) (P) 'SPRINY & 'AT&Y 60'-0" HIGH (P) 'AT&T 4'-0' PANEL ANTENNA TEMPORARY MONOPOLE - MOUNTED ON 'SPRINT' 60'-0" 6' x PL R 5' CONCRETE TEMPORARY MONOPOLE,TYP. BA Sprint BALLAST PLATFORM ® l' (TOTAL-1)(BY OTHERS) �4b[ q 330 Commerce. Sidle 100 Irvine. CA 92602 (P) 'AT&T' DC-6 MOUNTED ON (P)ANTENNA (P) 'AT&T- 4'-0" PANEL ANTENNA MOUNT (TOTAL-2)((BY OTHERS) MOUNTED ON 'SPRINT' 61 TEMPORARY MOROPOtE,TYP. A&E DEVELOPMENT (TOTAL-1)(BY OTHERS) 0 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES A&E SERVICES NOT USED 13 (P) 'AT&T' ANTENNA PLAN (SECTOR A & C) ° I,x` a. ° 1 30 C Birth a From.230 area,Cnlllomla 92021 ()14)729-6404 (714)333-4441 lay SUE DEVELOPMENT 0 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES NEW ANTENNA AND RRU CONFIGURAT',ON 3a60 e.eo-cn Xlem w3s0 B''aa,California 93321 1S Er— RM CENTER INTERNA IAANE ANIENN4 MpfiEl PORI if OF RRU R.NCOE1 AOF TW MA (714)729-0404 (]14)333-4441 lax 41 12052-0" LG aFP-65R-9UU-H4-K HEX RkUS II www.00re.ua.00m RF Uc 12 A2 120' fix-o' ANDREW 1-118-65F51-RPM HEX - - - - SITE INFORMATION AS 120' 52-0" POWE"EvE Pfi5-17-MIH-RR aI1PD - - _ _ SITE NAME: GAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS - TEMP RELO Pi$ AZIMUTH RW CBflFR-: ANTSIORA MANE ARLENW NOOSE FONT A NE RRU RRU MCOE1 !OF TM TMA SITE cnsuos: 11 20' 11-1 POw11— 161-11-1ILHRR GINE 2 RRMS II - - SPRINT:OG99XT211 C22E -- —I,— 16I 1-X--RR OUAO I RR0512 - - -9" O WA fi3- XH-RR aMD - AT&T: LAR054 SITE ADDRESS: 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92657 NEW TRANSMISSION LINES ORANGE COUNTY TNF @WflRY MOOEi 5¢E LENGTH SHEET TITLE CM - ' ""x_59 1-5/0' AT&T ANTENNA FIBER fi RFR-39EM-0°,-xxM E/3" 1,5'-0. PLAN, RF 9c 4 wR-viceasT-999 a/4" ns'-°" M/W 2 1NR4°° 1fi/,fi' 3fi°.-0- CONFIGURATION (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) SHEET NUMBER NOT USED 141 RF CONFIGURATION 2 A-6 4o9 J PA2016-061 Attachment No. PC 8 - Project Plans (P) 'SPRINT' 191 REN REV DATEIBY DESCRIPTION MOUNTED BEHIND (P) NOTE'. A/05/16 ANTENNA TYP MICROWAVE DISH (TOTAL-2) PRINT 1 1. ALL (P) ANTENNAS SHALL BE PAINTED i0 ° CRC 100x zD. MIC (TOTAL-1) MATCH (P) MONOPOLE. AN SPRINT NTD TO PANEL BE 'SPRINT ODU MOUNTED ANTENNA MOUNTED TO (P) BEHIND MICROWAVE(TOTAL-1) T.O. TEMPORARY MONOPOLE P 'SPRINT' PANEL ANTENNA PIPE MOUNT, TYP. (TOTAL-2 ELEv. 65'-0" (A.G.L) (P) 'AT&T 2Fr MICROWAVE fP,'SPRINT' PANEL ANTENNAS AND MICROWAVE RAD CENTER (TOTAL-1) W/ODU'S - - - - - - - - - - ELEV. 63' D -ENTER (TOTAL-2) BELOW (BEYOND) LPLAT&T' MICROWAVE RAD CENTER (BEYOND ENGINEER I CONSULTANT ELEV. 56'-O" (A.G1) (P) ''I 4'-0"PANEL P 'AT&T' T.O. PANEL ANTENNAS ANTENNA MOUNTED ON 'SPRINT' ELEV. 56'-0" (A.G.L.) 60'-0"TEMPORARY MONOPOLE, _ _ _ _ _ _(P 'AT&T' PANEL ANTENNAS RAD CENTER (E) 60'-0" HIGH LIVE TRF(. EYE. (TOTAL-2)(BY OTHERS) TVP. (BEYOND) - - -) (P) 'AT&T' RRUS 11 MOUNTED (P) 'AT&T' B'-0" PANEL ANTENNA BEHIND (P) ANTENNA, TIP. MOUNTED ON '$PRIM• so'-0" (TOTAL-4) (BY OTHERS) TEMPORARY MONOPOLE,TYP. (P) 'AT&T' RRUS 12 MOUNTED (TOTAL-4)(BY OTHERS) - BEHIND (P) ANTENNA, TYP. (E) 'CLERWIRC PANEL DAP UNIT (TOTA-2) (BY OTHERS) - MOUNTED TO (E) PIPE MOUNT TO REMAIN SITE BUILDER (E) 'cLERWIRE' PANEL ANTENNA MOUNTED TO (E) PIPE MOUNT TO REMAIN (E) 'SPRINT' 190OMHz T.O. 'SPRINT' PANEL ANTENNAS PRINT PANEL ANTENNA MOUNTED TO ELEV. 25'-0" (NGL) Sprint (P) 'S 60'-0" HIGH (E) PIPE MOUNT TO REMAIN (E) 40'-0" HIGH LIVE TREE, TEMPORARY MONOPOLE (TOTAL-1)(SECTOR 2) __(E) 'SPRINT PANEL ANTENNAS RAD CENTER ON 8' x 8' x 5' CONCRETE ELEV. P2'-0° (A,G.L.) 330 Commerce. S Ite 100 TVP_ (BEYOND) iYJ $PRINT' WALL 1JOUNTED flALLAST PLATFORM (E) 'SPRINT' 190OMHz RRH Irvine, IIA 9za02 CABLE TRAY TO REMAIN TO REMAIN (TOTAL-1)(SECTOR 2) (E) CMU WALL, TYP. A&E DEVELOPMENT (E) 'SPRINT' EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE L -_ -r 71 1 --_ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES � FINISHED GRADE — — ASE SERVICES V ELEV. 0'-0" as60 E.elrO.11-1.115 Bree,Calllornla R.21 ()141129-8400 (i14)AM-4441(ar SOUTHEAST ELEVATION �r 1 SUE DEVELOPMENT 1/s'-Y-0" 0 z 4 e' 1s (P) 'SPRINT' 19OOMHz RRH (P) 'SPRINT' MICROWAVE MOUNTED BEHIND (P) ODU (TOTA-1) NOTE. O ANTENNA,TYP. (TOTAL-2) 1. ALL (P) ANTENNAS SHALL BE PAINTED TO T.O. TEMPORARY MONOPOLE P 'SPRINT' PANEL ANTENNA (P) 'SPRINT 72'0 MATCH (P) MONOPOLE. ELEV. 6$'-0" (A.C.T) MICROWAVE DISH (TOTAL-1) DEVELOPMENT SERVICES _$_(PL_SPRINT' PANEL ANTENNAS AND MICROWAVE RAD CENTER _ 1z6o e...'0 n1 a1 CIV III-,Ca01 r 92a21 ELEV. 63'-0' (AOL) (P) 'SPRINT 1900MHz PANEL (1"729-6404 714)933-4441 Ux (P) 'AT&T MICROWAVE RAD CENTER ANTENNA MOUNTED TO (P) www.(re.�a.00m 'FEES. 5a'-o(A._GJ - - - - - - - - - PIPE MOUNT,TYP. (TOTAL-2) SITE INFORMATION P 'AT&T' T.O. PANEL ANTENNAS SITE NAME: 6'-°" (A.GL> �- - GAS RECOVERY P) 'AT&T MOUNTED HIGH N PANEL I. (P)_AT&'-O' (APANEL_ANTENNAS RAO CENTER _ � ANTENNA MOUNTED ON 'SPRINT SYSTEMS - TEMP RELO 4—ELEV. 52'-0" (ALL) (p) 'AT&T 2FT MICROWAVE 80'-0"TEMPORARY MONOPOLE (TOTAL-1)W/ ODU's (TOTAL-a) SITE cnsuDE: (TOTA-2) BELOW _(P) 'I RRUS 12 MOUNTED SPRINT:OG99XT211 (P) 'AT&T' RRUS 11 MOUNTED BEHIND (P)ANTENNA,TYP. (E) 'SPRINT' 190OMHz PANEL ANTENNA AT&T: LAR054 BEHIND (P) ANTENNA,TYP. (TOTAL-2) (BY OTHERS) MOUNTED TO (E) PIPE MOUNT TO REMAIN (TOTAL-4) (BY OTHERS) .o (TOTAL-I)(SECTOR 2) SITE ADDRESS: (P) SPRINT 60--0"HIGH TEMPORARY MONOPOLE 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE ON 8' x 8' x 5' CONCRETE (E) 'VERIZOW PANEL NEWPORT BEACH,CA 9265/ T.O. 'SPRINT PANEL ANTENNAS BALLAST ' PANEL ANTENNAS (TYP OF 4) ELEV. 2$'-O" (A.G.L) ORANGE COUNTY (E) 'AT&T' PANEL _ HE) 'SPRINT' EQUIPMENT SHEET TITLE ANTENNAS (TYP.OF 4) ENCLOSURE _UE'SPRINT' PANEL ANTENNAS RAD CENTER J; (E) CMU WALL, TIP. (E) EQUIPMENT SHELTER (E) CMU WALL TYP. ELEV. 22'-0" (A.G.L.) YOTHERS) (E) 'SPRINT WALL MOUNTED CABLE TRAY TO REMAIN (E) 'SPRINT' 1900MHz RRH MOUNTED TO Tr_ (E) PIPE MOUNT TO REMAIN, (TOI 1)(SECTOR 2) ELEVATIONS L I - -cD- 1 L Ir - t= _'_-T L', SHEET NUMBER (P) 'SPRINT WALL MOUNTED (E) 'SPRINT' WALL MOUNTED (E) ACCESS DOOR CABLE SHROUND CABLE TRAY TO REMAIN A-7 SOUTHWEST ELEVATION 2 T��T PA�016-061 Attachment No. PC 8 - Project Plans REV DATEIBY DESCRIPTION n os/Ds/Is loot zos U N DERGRDUND SERVICE CRC D� ALE Ri OE sOIIiH ERN C ALIfO RNID \ Call: TOLL ER EE • 811 ENGINEER I CONSULTANT print SITE NAME: GAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS - PERM SITE SITE BUILDER SITE NUMBER : OG25XC211 Sprint ADDRESS : 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92657 SITE TYPE : RAWLAND A&E DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY OWNER: SPRINT CM SHEET DESORPTION O UB MITTWG AN APPLICATION FOR A ZONING PERMIT AND ALL OTHER RELATED DEVELOPMENTSERVICES TINT/CF ORANGE NLML JAN-'N (JP) BARAN AFFR .ALF FOR THE T-1 TITLE SHEET A&E SERVICES 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE PHONE 714.231.3684 \ NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92657 EMAIL: jean-phifipps.boron®spdnLwm 'SPRINTINSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING C-1 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ssss E .11..11-S e22D 3— Cellla rn la 928]1 CONTACT: EL ESBER 714p294404 FT 4)296-4441fa PHONE: 714.834.4105 POWER COMPANY: 65'-0" HIGH MONO-EUCALYPTUS C-2 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY r,w",.ea,e SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON (SCE) (4) PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON THE (P) MONO-EUCALYPTUS ,55 APPLICANT. PHONE 800.655 4555 (6) RRHS WITH (2) COMBINERS AND (2) FILTERS MOUNTED ON THE (P) A-1 SITE PLAN SPRINT PCS MONO-EUCALYPTUS A-2 EXISTING ENLARGED SITE PLAN SITE DEVELOPMENT 330 COMMERCE, SUITE 100 MV PRONOER: (1) MICROWAVE DISH ANTENNA WITH (1) ODU MOUNTED ON THE (P) r MONO-EUCALYPTUS A-3 (P) ENLARGED SITE PUN O IRVINE, CA 92602 AT&T S1) GPC ANTENNA MOUNTED ON THE (P) MONOD EUCALYPTUS PHONE: 808 944 044] 11) PANEL ANTENNAS TO REPLACE (O MOUNTED ON THE (E) CMU WALL A-4 MONO-EUCALYPTUS MAT FOUNDATION o (1) RRU TO REPLACE (E) MOUNTED ON THE (E) CMU WALL A-5 ANTENNA PLANS APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE: (2) RRHS WITH (1) COMBINER AND (1) FILTER MOUNTED ON THE (E) CMU WALL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CORE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES A-6 EQUIPMENT PUN sssR S.2o-en meal pzso ft0. Q 3350 E BIRCH STREET )/25D 'AT&T' INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING: 29-8,04 Rro9-ieszezl NN 3'HwAA NILS SITE CBRE/SONT C. 92821 A-] AT&T ANTENNA PLAN (REFERENCE ONLY) Oe m ,� CONTACT: JULIA ,8404RANGES n14px9-e4 o4 p141ooab441 r8x PHONE 714.729.8404 (8) PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON THE (P) MONO-EUCALYPTUS 888 c+ us c4 • (16) RRUS MOUNTED ON THE (P) MONO-EUCALYPTUS - • (3) DC-6 MON THE (P) MONO-EUCALYPTUS SITE INFORMATION PROPQ2tt RIMTION:INFO (1) 2R. MICROWAVE ON THE (P) MONO-EUCALYPTUS JURISDICTION'. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH (1) MICROWAVE MOUNT SITE NAME' *0H, JURISDICTION CURRENT ZONING- OS OPEN SPACE (2) COU, GAS RECOVERY -- AP.N.: 478-031-71 (2) 3/16' TRANSMISSION LINES (F) CONSTRUCTION TYPE V-N PROJECT DESCRIPTION SYSTEMS - PERM SITE VICINITY MAP (E BUILDING OCCUPANCY' N/A LATITUDE: 33' 36' 45.17' N SITE CASCADE LONGITUDE: -11T 49' 17.69' W START OUT FROM THE 'SPRINT' OFFICE D IRVIN2 OG25XC211 ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE TAKE EXCHANGE TO EL CAMINO REAL N WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS IN THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL HEAD SOUTHEAST ON COMMERCE TOWARD EXCHANGE GOVERNING AUTHORITIES NOTHING IN THESE PUNS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT SITE ADDRESS: TURN LEFT ONTO EXCHANGE WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES: 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE TURN LEFT AT THE 1ST CROSS STREET ONTO EL CAMINO REAL NEWPORT BEACH.CA 92657 TAKE CULVER DR TO NEWPORT COAST DR IN NEWPORT BEACH • 2013 CALIF. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE • 2013 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CCD- TURN RIGHT AT THE 1ST CROSS STREET ONTO EL CAMINO REAL N (INCL. TITLES 24 & 25) • TIA-222-G STANDARD ORANGE COUNTY USE THE RIGHT 2 LANES TO TURN RIGHT AT THE OLD CROSS STREET ONTO • 2013 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODES • LOCAL BUILDING CODE'_ TURN RIGHT ONTO CULVER DR • 2013 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODES • CITY/COUNTY ORDINI I, SHEET TITLE CONTINUE ONTO BONITA CANYON DR • 2013 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODES USE THE LEFT 2 LANES TO TURN LEFT ONTO NEWPORT COAST DR • 2013 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODES MAKE A U-TURN • 2013 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODES DESTINATION WILL BE ON THE RIGHT AT 20662 NEWPORT COAST DR PROJECT INFORMATION NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92657 CODE COMPLIANCE TITLE SHEET ARCHITECT'. 'k I-NI E9NCES G TF EL _ - lb0 I H NIH YIRT #250 - e RECO, CA 92821 CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLAINS AND LX SIING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS CONTACT. STEVEN M. RAMON ON THE JOB SITE AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT AND/OR SHEET NUMBER PRONE 714]29.8404 ENGMEERS IN VNRITNC OF ANY DISCEEEARHES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE DRIVING DIRECTIONS CONSULTING TEAM CONTRACTOR NOTES SHEET INDEX T-1 411 J PA�016-061 Attachment No. PC 8 - Project Plans REV DATEBV DESCRIPTION 68/05/16 A )669 z6s / CR I I / APN: 478-031-63 / ' ENGINEER CONSULTANT // s ' �(E) RAWLAND� —(E) RAWLAND—,,, \\ II ""—(E) RAWLAND� SITE BUILDER *W5 i APN: 478-031-68 print '/ �\ 336 LamT361 106 Irvine. CA 926022 f / (E) PALE, (E) FIBER P.O.G. \ (E) FIBER FEED TO (E) �� A&E DEVELOPMENT V � �(E) ACCESS ROAD � � TELCO CABINET,APPROH BBD' o$s \ o DEVELOPMENT SERVICES A&E SERVICES \ / \ 3350 E.BIrc6 S IHS area.Ce6r 92821 .� / / / "IA� V t91n1]TR40oo ,ea 1 fax 027 'Svv SITE DeveLOw2eNT (E) ACCESS GAr� � w } tgov . x,?,p Q, wIV. vv / v /� pp 0(H / DEVELOPMENT SERVICES E GAS RECOVERY ) 33s6 E.e]on s real pzso Q I ( ) (]141129 6 6 '(]11)33384441!rx C) \ \\ SYSTEMS FACWTY O 9 ��®o � • SITE INFORMATION O SIZE Ni GAS RECOVERY rF p ® O `� SYSTEMS - PERM SITE z (E) 'SPRINT' ANTENNA AREA SITE CASCADE: OG25XC211 SITE ADDRESS L]/ K"--(E) RAWLAND--,,, / 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH,CA 9265/ (E) 'SPRINTEQUIPMENT AREA / (P) 'SPRINT'PERMANENT 65'-0"HIGH ORANGE COUNTY ri-I, MONO-EUCALYPTUS LOCATION SHEET TITLE 2. -s R�� ����a ° qcF SITE PLAN 1 �� 'o sFcr I T 1 � SHEET NUMBER A-1 SCALE SITE PLAN oR 760 0 40 80 160 1 -4-12 J PAr2016-061 Attachment No. PC 8 - Project Plans REV DATEIBV DESCRIPTION O A 05 16 ,00x zos (E) ACCESS GATE 5r� (E) PROPANE / TANK TO REMAIN ENGINEER I CONSULTANT "W, ,2'—O" WIDE 'SIA 'T2f0H> - SERVICE ROAD r N' (E) ELECTRICAL PANEL 0 TO REMAIN FE)CM 12'-0 HIGH bERIZON' &T—MOBILE W/CELL CMU WALL TYP (E) AIR COMMPRESSOR �III.FON TEMPORARY TO MONOPOLE TO REMAIN JJ` ( FOTHERS) TO BE REMOVED / Y � (BY OTHERS) SITE BUILDER J > J (E) NATURAL (E) U/GPARKING CONNECTION TO REL6MN i �(E) LIVE TREE,TOP. G°"°°ITS � Sprint ' AND PIPES m 'SPRINT' &AT&T 80'-0' HIGH - i TEMPORARY MONOPOLE ON MAIN TRANSFORMER 33o mmmer�e. sw,e ,00 - TEMPORARY CONCRETE BALLAST AND GENERATOR - b J� PLATFOO AN Irvine CA 92602 RM TO BE REMOVED BREAKER TO REMAIN (E) ELECTRICAL MANHOLES ",TT ©' < j AND CMU WALL TO REMAIN „p A&E DEVELOPMENT I DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ME SERVICES (E) TRANSFORMERS 3350 E eIrcn sneer ers0 (E) 'AT&T' PANEL ANTENNAS TO REMAIN - 89-640,11( (E) WASTE 129aa0o I333,1441 33,Ba14 a na. PIPE MOUNTED TO (E) CMU O. NEUTRALIZATION TANK _ r .,, www . WALL TO REMAIN TO REMAIN _ _ E VERIZON WIRELESS' PANEL (E) EMERGENCY (E) SITE OEVELCPMENT ( ) GENERATOR TO CONTROL ANTENNAS PIPE MOUNTED i0 REMAIN BUILDING (E) CMU WALL TO REMAIN TO / pp REMAIN PC EQ V 'VERIZON WIRELESS' /� GCOB DEVELOPMENT SERVICES EQUIPMENT SHELTER 10 REMAIN B• / AT&T EQUIPMENT _ � SP®R%T0tiMZH A—g sNss9o e..elroren s p.-. na SHELTER TO REMAIN(E) SPRINT' POWER wwwooreus.como rex O/� RUN WITHIN 0—D" � SITE INFORMATION (-) (E)EL ANTE AV*k PRECASTTRENCH - PANEL ANTENNAS PIPE SITE Ni �� MOUNTED ( cMu GAS RECOVERY WALL TO REMAIN (F) SPRINT' DOW R P D C AT2� SYSTEMS - PERM SITE /o ter (E) MCCA WITHIN (E) BUILDING A—s �L J�.itnCT SITE CASCADE: � q ELECTRICAL 1 OG25XC211 CONDUIT MOUNTED ON THE '�•� OUTSIDE OF (E) CMD WALL (E) CABLEPTRAY TO REMAINLL SIM SITE ADDRESS: 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH,CA 9265/ - ORANGE COUNTRY SHEET TITLE (E) 'T—MOBILE CONTROL e 6 PANEL TO REMAIN EXISTING ENLARGED SITE r,A PLAN (E) ACCESS GATE—= (E) 'SPRINV EQUIPMENT o SHEET NUMBER A-8 LEASE AREA TO REMAIN EXISTING ENLARGED SITE PLAN1 9a ,--za-a• D ,o�� 413 J PA�016-061 Attachment No. PC 8 - Project Plans REV DATEIBY DESCRIPTION 05 16 PUBLIC WORKS NOTES n CRc 199x z9s 1. IF ANY OF THE EXISTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SURROUNDING TI I SITE IS (E) ACCESS GATE 1 / - DAMAGED BY THE PRIVATE WORK, (P) CONCRETE SIDEWALK, CURB AND _ GUTTER, ALLEY/STREET PAVEMENT, AND OTHER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WILL (E) PROPANE BE REQUIRED BY THE CITY AT THE TIME OF PRIVATE CONSTRUCTION TANK TO REMAIN COMPLETION. SAID DETERMINATION AND THE EXTENT OF THE REPAIR WORK SHALL BE MADE AT THE DISCRETION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR. 2. THE STORAGE OF ALL PROJECT RELATED EQUIPMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER I CONSULTANT '9A SHALL BE ON-SITE AND OUTSIDE THE PUBLIC RIGHT-0F-WAY. 12'-0" WIDE Aj 3- ALL WORK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF[-WAY SHALL FOLLOW CITY'S MUNICIPAL SERVICE ROAD � CODE CHAPTER 13.20. 3 (E) ELECTRICAL PANEL _G1/ C AN APPROVED ENCROACHMENT PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ALL WORK ACTIVITIES TO REMAIN WITHIN THE CITY'S PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. (E) CMU WALL TVP. AIR COMMFRESSOR TO �• , TO REMAIN SITE BUILDER P PARKING � BOJ (E) NATURAL (E) Li CONNECTION TO REMAIN �(E) LIVE TREE, TYP. `v CONDUITS Sprint AND PIPES m 110 '1r (E) MAIN TRANSFORMER aao commerce, style 109 . , T AND GENERATOR Irvine. CA 92602 a BREAKER TO REMAIN (E) ELECTRICAL MANHOLES """�� 4' -� AND CMU WALL T0 REMAIN a A&E DEVELOPMENT GENERATOR tom/ O I 1 ��� ENCLOSURE (BY OTHERS) t( (P) 'VERIZON' §T-MOBILE - '' PERMANENT MONOPOLE (BY OTHERS) '^ DEVELOPMENT ERVICES ICES (E) TRANSFORMERS ME SERVICES (E) 'AT&T' PANEL ANTENNAS (P) -f-MOBILE' B'%1T' TO REMAIN assn e.s9cn s ell Brea,Celll 192821 PERMANENT EQU(BY OTHERS) (E) WASTE c O1<hz9.6..�w ro 11 I'll PIPE MOUNTED TO (E) CMU ENCLOSURE BY OTHERS NEUTRALIZATION TANK _ WALL TO REMAIN ( ) O TO REMAIN _ E VERIZON WIRELESS' PANEL (E) EMERGENCY (E) SITE OEVELCPmENT ( ) GENERATOR TO CONTROL ANTENNAS PIPE MOUNTED TO REMAIN BUILDING (E) CMU WALL TO REMAIN TO / pp REMAIN V EQUIPMENT SHELTER TO REMAIN �TE El �GL06i� DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 0� (E) 'AT&T EQUIPMENT IS .SPR1rS�piLM $ XAa 3369 E.6.aa 6 real 4119 �A@ SHELTER TO REMAIN X 0 10 area carcoma 9rzezl � A29 pulzrz9 aAOa z1a166z aa1 rex ( www.Gore.us.com ,yyLE) SPRINT' POWER�o RUN WITHIN (E) 5 0 _ EE) 'SPRINT' SITE INFORMATION WIDE PRECAST TRENCH PANEL ANTENNAS AZs NWFl RECOVERY (E) CMU WALL (E) 'SPRINT POWER P.0-C AT SYSTEMS - PERM SITE (E) MCCA WITHIN (E) BUILDING y SITE CASCADE: ___HE) 'SPRINT' FILE CTRICAL OG25XC211 '•r CONDUIT MOUNTED ON THE OUTSIDE OF (E) CMU WALL (E) 'SPRINT' WALL MOUNTED CABLE TRAY TO REMAIN SITE ADDRESS: 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH,CA 9265/ (E) T MOBILE CONTROI �qT&T ORANGE COUNBY PANEL TO REMAIN o � �0 SE-ST SHEET TITLE A-g (P) 'SPRINT' PERMANENT 65-0' y O (E) 'SPRINT FOUIPMENT HIGH MONO-EUCALYPTUS ` (P) ENLARGED SITE LEASE AREA TO REMAIN A PLAN a (E) ACCESS DOOR 'Aj OHO' "�9LF' 4�/ Tib SHEET NUMBER Ag iC ry A-3 (P) ENLARGED SITE PLAN -20-0- 1D ill 41-4 _J 41- 4- 4 PAr2016-061 Attachment No. PC 8 - Project Plans REV DATEIBY DESCRIPTION NOTE: A oe/o5/Is 199x z9s L (P) ANTENNAS AND DODPMENT NOT cRc SHOWN IN PIAN VIEW EOR CLARITY. 11 ENGINEER I CONSULTANT SITE BUILDER Sprint 330 Lam Irvine. T2100 CA 92660022 _ A&E DEVELOPMENT (E) 'SPRINY EQUIPMENT LEASE AREA TO REMAIN O DEVELOPMENT SERVICES A&E SERVICES 3350 E.131n,h.beer IMS area,Celllornla 92821 Ur14)729-6404 (714 t!ez r.e (E) ACCESS DOOR SITE /DEVELLOPMENI V DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 3350 E.6ACA 311E 1 p350 B1'9e,L4liZ"la O21 1714)729-34 (]14)3344 41 fax SITE INFORMATION OPEN SPACE \ sITE DAME: (P) 'SPRINT' COAX CABLES TO BE \\\,I GAS RECOVERY ROUTED WITHIN (E) WALL MOUNTED CABLE TRSYSTEMS - PERM SITE AY (E) BOLLARD TO BE 15'-0" 5—D SITE CASCADE: REMOVED (TOTAL-4) OG25XC211 7:N - SITE ADDRESS: (P) 'SPRINT' CABLE SHROUD (P) 'SPRINT- PERMANENT 65'-0" MOUNTED TO (E) CMU WALL _ HIGH MONO-EUCALYPTUS ON (P) 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE 15'-e x 15'-0" x 4'-0"DEEP NEWPORT BEACH,CA 9265/ (P) 'SPRINT' CONDUITS TO MAT FOUNDATION e PENETRATE (E) CMU WALL A-/ ORANGE COUNTY SHEET TRUE (P) 'SPRINT' CABLE ICE BRIDGE, FROM INSIDE OF (E) CMU WALL TO (P) 'SPRINY MONO-EUCALYPTUS �-. •..7`" _I. 2'-0° \ . / MONO-EUCALYPTUS (E) GAS TANK TO BE MAT FOUNDATION REMOVED (TOTAL-1) (E) 12'-0" HIGH CMU WALL SHEET NUMBER (E) 'SPRINT' WALL MOUNTED CABLE TRAY A-4 MONO-EUCALYPTUS MAT FOUNDATION oy 1 1 42� J PA�016-061 Attachment No. PC 8 - Project Plans REV DATE/BY DESCRIPTION De/oE/Itl /o0s ms ) ANTENNA RF CONFIGUR.Lq'V AND SCHEDULE cRc 2[NNOLOGY I "21MIIM qA6 LENTEN "NIENNd M"HE NI1WNq IpBFL ELECT. MECH, @ Of RRH RMV MOOR @ OF flRX RFH..OIL R Of IN PLS RAH (E) CMU WALL FLT TILT LOMBINEF COMEDIT MODEL 1900/.MHI. YP 59'-0• RFS MRYTRRUX4120 10 } 2MIN g}MH19%u 1 MM BCD 2X`W 1 IBC19O[1N-R /\z M MHz NA' %`40 Ali IP) 1-- . 2 0 1 10.MIHBX20 � E EMPTY PIPE MOUNT. IYP. TECHNOLOEY AANUM HAD CENTER ARIEUNA MAKE ANTENNA MODEL ELECT. ORN @ OF RN RRH MODES N OF FRH RRN MODEL @ V IN-AWD UA RRH ENGINEER/CONSULTANT O PLi PL1 COMBINER COMBINER MODEL 19GG/36C MHx. ]P 22'-D" 15 APN9EF1IBGA20 - D will 19M 05 1 RRH WO 4M I IB017-2 / o RSW Yh R.M 22'-0• MFM IPIMMI}-C-IRO R 0 1 TD-MMNXRO YgTj PUNT _ ®TO '!r'I h"MOM ARITIMMA MAKE ANTENNA MODEL ELECT. DEC, 11 RLI @ OF FAH RW1 MODEL PDF AMI RRH MODEL P OF IN-Bnxe Pas RRH COMBINER C6MBINEfl MDDFL 'CLE (E)REMOVED (IRE' RRH TO RE ^+ 19W/Bb NXx 210 UVRO RMERIIPYE MMiRRiR%-C-IRO I 0 R MIN�MN29%15 I RM1 BW 4M 1 IBCI9MN-2 REMOVED (TOTAL-I) G (E) 'cLERwIRE' PANEL ANTENNA To /P1MY1}-O-MD 1 2 D 1 10-RmMxzo - - -BE REMOVED (TOTAL-1) SITE BUILDER (E) 'SPRINT 1900/900MHz PANEL ANTENNA (P) TRANSMISSION LINES NOTES: MOUNTED ON (E) CMU WALL i0 REMAIN L (P) HYBRIFLEN CABLES SHALL BE ROUTED THROUGH (E) TYPE DuANmr 517E FEWER CABLE TRAY. - 2 (P) MONO-EUCALYPTUS, (P) ANTENNAS AND EQUIPMENT Sprint (E) 'SPRINT' 190OMHz RRH MOUNTED ON m91 1 5/6• aBs-O• SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH (E) SURROUNDINGS. 3. (P) MONO-EUCALYPTUS FOUNDATION NOT SHOWNWN FOR (E) CMU WALT-TO REMAIN (1-TOTAL) �%% 1 71e •t25� CLARITY. 330 commerce. Sidle 196 NMI3 1-1/e 31$'-IY Irvine. CA 92602 (E) 'SPRINT WALL MOUNTED RIBFiIflt 2 1-1/4• !00'-Y CABLE TRAY TO REMAIN A&E DEVELOPMENT EXISTING ANTENNA PLAN (SECTOR 2) 0 1' 2' / \ DEVELOPMENTSERVICES / \ / \ A&E SERVICES OUTLINE OF(P) 'SPRINT / \ 3319 F..11..11.xl Mese MONO-EUCALYPTUS BRANCHES� \ e WWW e., O 910(71440 02321 pial72 1a)233-anal fax (P) 'SPRINT 190OMHz COMBINER A m MOUNTED BEHIND (P) ANTENNA, / \\ SUE DEVELOPMENT (TOTAL-2) ®� \ / (P) 'SPRINT' GPS ANTENNA T / �(E) CMU WALL (P) 'SPRINT 1900M2 PANEL 0 ANTENNA MOUNTED TO (P) MONO-EUCALYPTUS, (TOTAL-2) DEVELOPMENT SERVICES E.E.6Nc0 511-1"W ( Brea,Ca Nfoxnla 93321 it<1]39-Baea (]IC)333-0011 for MOUNTED 0 (E�MU RRHWALTO (E) EMPTY PIPE MOUNT, TVP'. (P) 'SPRINT' 190OMHz RRH eo 1 +ww. —..— REPLACE (E) RRH (TOTAL-1) MOUNTED BEHIND (P) ANTENNA, (TOTAL-4) (P) 'SPRINT PERMANENT 65'-0' SITE INFORMATION _wLTft� HIGH MONO-EUCALYPNS SITE Nnme (P) 'SPRINT' BOOMH2 RRH 51�T, Yp1;�o (P) 'SPRINT MICROWAVE W/ FILTER MOUNTED TO (E) 0TM"' GAS RECOVERY CMU WALL (TOTAL-1) (P) 'SPRINT' 8GOMHz RRH W/ FILTER ODU (TOTAL-I) SYSTEMS - PERM SITE (P) 'SPRINT' 25DOMH2 PANEL ANTENNA MOUNTED BEHIND (P)ANTENNA, TYP. MOUNTED TO (E) CMU WALL TO (TYFAL-2) I SITE CASCADE: REPLACE (E)ANTENNA (TOTAL-1) (P) 'SPRINT 250OMHZ RRH N SPRINT MICROWAVE ) OG25XC211 MOUNTED BEHIND (P) ANTENNA, ANTENNA (TOTAL-1) / (E) 'SPRINT' 1900/800MHz PANEL ANTENNA (TOTAL-2) / SITE ADDRESS: MOUNTED ON (E) CMU WALL TO REMAIN / 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE (P) 'SPRINT 190OMHz RRH MOUNTED BELOW \ / NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92657 (E) RRH ON (E) CMU WALL(TOTAL-1) \ / (P) 'SPRINT 1900MH2 COMBINER MOUNTED BELOW (P) 'SPRINT 250OMI PANEL ANTENNA % ®, M / ORANGE COUNTY (E) RRH ON (E) CMU WALL (TOTAL-1) MOUNTED TO (P) MONO-EUCALYPTUS; .,S�yp /�Pp� // SHEET TITLE (TOTAL-2) V 97iA` / (E) 'SPRINT' 190OMH2 RRH MOUNTED ON (E) CMU WALL TO REMAIN (I-TOTAL) / ANTENNA PLANS (E) 'SPRINT' WALL MOUNTED \ / CABLE TRAY TO REMAIN \\ // AND EQUIPMENT PLAN SHEET NUMBER A-5 (P) ANTENNA PLAN (SECTOR 2) 9R /;`""M D 1 3 (P) ANTENNA PLAN 9R ,,;` o D 1 410 J PAr2016-061 Attachment No. PC 8 - Project Plans REV DATEIBV DESCRIPTION p 68/05/16 ,66x z6s crc ENGINEER I CONSULTANT 15'-0" (E) 'SPRINT' EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE SITE BUILDER (E)SUB PANEL (E) TRANSFORMER ON Sprint RAISED CONCRETE PAD 33o can,me«e. si,11e ,06 Irvine. CA 92602 MOUNNTEDTED OON (E) R CABINET N RAISED CONCRETE PAD A&E DEVELOPMENT (E) SPRINT o POWER PANEL O (E) TELCO PULL 9O% O (E) 'SPRINT TELCO PANEL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES A&E SERVICES Brea, alIN Slree2821 1=jl 09-1404l(714a 92321 (� SPOOL Box o,<r>�::.°w�°o�' ,pax w �c e NOT USED °o SITE DEVELOPMENT (E) 'SPRINT' 9927 (E) COAX CABLE TRAY n 5 MMBTS CABINET (E) CPS ANTENNA, TYR (TOTAL-2) u (E) 'SPRINT' 60ECv2 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BATTERY CABINET 3Ss9 E...en Snaa,u33o (E) FIBER O—BON, TYP. (TOTAL-1) Sa,Caumra 1 1]141TR9-3404n ( ,4)333-Nme3 41!rx ) www.cole.ua.com SITE INFORMATION EQUIPMENT PODNCRETE (E) CMU WALL SITE NAME: GAS RECOVERY (E) WALL MOUNTED SYSTEMS - PERM SITE ° CABLE TRAY SITE CASCADE: (E) CONCRETE PAD (E) POWER CABINET MOUNTED OG25XC2 1 1 ON (E) RAISED CONCRETE PAD o. SITE ADDRESS: 28862 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE NEW PORT BEACH,CA 9285/ ` II ORANGE COUNTY SHEET TITLE / (E) ACCESS GATES \ \ EXISTING EQUIPMENT PLAN SHEET NUMBER A-6 NOT USED 3 EXISTING EQUIPMENT PLAN 9 „a`,`6. D 1 427 J PA�016-061 Attachment No. PC 8 - Project Plans REV DATEIBV DESCRIPTION 08/05/16 (P} ANTENNA AND RRU coNFICURATION (P) TRANSMISSION LINES " CRc UFOs z06 POS AIIMUIH RAD DEFTER AMEN.NAME ANTENNA MODEL FORT It OF NRU RRU MFFEL b W TAM TNA ME OIIANTITY Mo. I'm IFNM 11 20 p8-1 Ell11EIN WF 70866 HEX 2 RRUS 12 - - C,A, 1 A 5-50 7/9" 175'-0' C1 YD' qB-4" KATIflEIN BFF 10666 HEX $ RRUS IZ - - LOSE I2 RFFT-3fi6M-0OI-XXM J/6' 175'-0" Ld '2F' d8'-p" NATHREIN 800 10866 HC% P RRUS 4 DL 6 WR-VGB6H-RRD NE 2D' qe-a" I11H1EN 8001D636 HEX RRUS I2 - - M/w rz LMRaFD ti/16" JaF'-0' ENGINEER I CONSULTANT Lw I ASIAN I RM.CEMER AN2NM4:we E ANIENAW:.MORE FORT OF NET RRU MODEL M OF U. MA At 129 18'-p' NATHREIN Soo 10866 HEX 2 RRaS 12 - - A2 12P q6'-q" NATHREIN BFF 1D6fi6 HE% 2 RRUS 12 - - M 12P 48-4 HATHNEIN BOD 10866 HIX P RRUS 12 - - 4 I2C ._'t NATHREIN BFF 1D366 HEX 2 RRUS IZ - - NOTE: SITE BUILDER 1. (P) MONOPOLE, (P) ANTENNAS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH (E) SURROUNDINGS. Sprint 330 Irvine. LamT210F CLA 92660022 A A&E DEVELOPMENT r� /�OUTl1NE OF (P) 'SPRINT' O \9 _——...———— \\ / MONO-EUCALYPTUS BRANCHES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES OP R' \ ARE SERVICES NOT USED 2 ��� LY 83.E 6lr23 cA 3Nae1 1261 yG 9G V \ Dfe9.Celllomla 921 19161129www core 4 333-441 fez M, v \ SITE DEVELOPMENT \ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES lE�3 \ 3350 E.64c6 An-,(7350 Bree,Ca F(ornla 98321 (P) 'ATV RRUS 12 MOUNTED C714RSN-3404 (714)333-4441 fax ( (P) 'AT&T 2FT MICROWAVE BEHIND (P) ANTENNq TYP. www.core.us.com AT SOFT RAD CENTER (TOTAL-16)(STACKED)(BY OTHERS) _ SITE INFORMATION A BITE Ni I GAS RECOVERY 07, SYSTEMS - PERM SITE /\se ( MICROWAVE BEHIND(TOT (P) 2FT J3.\ I SITE CASCADE: y ) OG25XC211 (P) 'Ai SURGE (P) 'SPRINT' PERMANENT 65'-0- SUPPRESSOR TYP. HIGH MONO-EUCALYPTUS (TOTAL-3)(BY OTHERS) SITE ADDRESS \ 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE \ / NEWPORT BEACH,CA 9265/ \ (P)"AT&T' 8'-0' PANEL ANTENNA N ORANGE COUNTY \ MOUNTED ON 'SPRINT' 65'-0' SHEET TITLE PERMANENT MONO-EUCALYPTUS, TP. `� /(TOTAL-6)(BY OTHERS) \` AT&T ANTENNA PLAN (REFERENCE ONLY) SHEET NUMBER A-7 NOT USED 131 (P) 'AT&T' ANTENNA PLAN (SECTOR A & C) 41 J PA2016-061 Attachment No. PC 8 - Project Plans REV DATEIBY DESCRIPTION naTEs NOTES: I (P) HYBRIFLEX CABLES SHALL BE (P) 'SPRINT 190OMHz PANEL ANTENNA MOUNTED TO (P) 1, (P) HYBRIFLEX CABLES SHALL BE n W/os/le loox zos ROUTED THROUGH (E) CABLE TRAY. MONO-EUCALYPTUS, (TOTAL-2) ROUTED THROUGH (E) CABLE TRAY. BE 'SPRINT ANTENNA, RRH MOUNTED (P) 'SPRINT MOUNTED TO PANEL cec 2. (P) MONOPOLE, (P) ANTENNAS AND 2. (P) MONOPOLE, (P) ANTENNAS AND BEHIND (P)ANTENNA, (TOTPL-2) ANTENNA MOUNTED TO (P) EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PAINTED TO (P) 'SPRINT 190OMHz RRH MOUNTED BEHIND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PAINTED TOMONO-EUCALYPTUS, (TOTAL-2) MATCH (E) SURROUNDINGS. MATCH (E) SURROUNDINGS. (P)ANTENNA (TOTAL-4) (P) 'SPRINT GPS ANTENNA P) 'AT&T 2FT MICROWAVE WITH (P) ODU BEHIND (P) 'SPRINT MICROWAVE (P) 'AT&T 2FT MICROWAVE (P) 'SPRINT' 25OOMHz RRH MOUNTED (P) MICROWAVE(TOTAL-2) ODU (TOTAL-1) WITH (P) ODU BEHIND (P) BEHIND (P) ANTENNA (TOTAL-2) T.O. (P) MONO EUCALYPTUS h TD, (P) MONO EUCALYPTUS MICROWAVE (TOTAL-2) (P) 'SPRINT' 2500MHx PANEL - ELEV. 65'-0" (A.GL) ELEV, 65'-0" (A.G,L) 1r—(P) (BEYOND) ENGINEER CONSULTANT MONO-EANTENNAS TO (P) \ TA. (P) 'SPRINT PANEL ANTENNA h J� T.O. (P) 'SPRINT' PANEL ANTENNA y, 'SPRINT 190OMHz PANEL MONO-EUCALYPTUS (TOTAL-2) ( ) Y ( ) ANTENNA MOUNTED TO (P) n _ ANTENNA P 'AT T' MICROWAVE RAD CENT.. ER h .L (P) 'AT&T MICROWAVE RAD CENTER BE OND _ _ _ Ir. MONO EUCALYPTUS, (TOTAL-2) ELEV. 62'-O_ A.G L V ELEV. 82 O A G L J --->_ (� ELEV 6o'-a" AG.L) EL- 50'-Y' (A.c,L) �)_ I P 'SPRINT' PANEL ANTENNA AND MICROWAVE RAD CENTER I '�-� --(P) SPRINT 190OMHz � (P� 'SPRINT' PANEL ANTENNA AND MICROWAVE RAD CENTER ELEV. 59'-6" (AG Y— JI COMBINER MOUNTED BEHIND ELEV. 59'-0 (A.G.L) (P) 'SPRINT 190OMHz COMBINER MOUNTED (P) 'SPRINT MICROWAVE L�� (P)ANTENNA' (TOTAL-2) BEHIND (P) ANTENNA (TOTAL-2) ANTENNA WITH (TOTAL 1) (P) 'SPRINT' BOOMHz RRH �'� —(P) 'SPRINT 190OMHz RRH MOUNTED BEHIND (P) i MOUNTED BEHIND (P) SITE BUILDER r I (P(P) ANTENNA, (TOTAL-2)) 'SPRINT BOOMHz RRH MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNA, (TOTAL-2) s ANTENNA, (TOTAL-4) 1 I I ��� �I I I _ _ _ _ (P) 'AT&T PANEL ANTENNA RAD CENTER P 'Ai&i' PANEL ANTENNA RAD CENTER _ ELIVE TREE, �, _ _ _ O I ELEv_ 48-4 (A.G� 4 ELEV_ 4B'_a' (ACL) I _ I Tm. (BEYOND)� Sprint (P) 'AT&T' 8'-0- PANEL ANTENNA I�vine. CSao CA. 2602 Loa y 1L I h 93802 \ PERMANENT MONO-EUCALYPTUS,TYP. `.I (P) 'AT&Y 8'-0- PANEL ANTENNA MOUNTED ON MOUNTED(B 'SPRINT' fi5'-0' A&E DEVELOPMENT 'SPRI(TOTALMONO-EUCALYPTUS. --8)(BY OTHERS) TYP. (P) 'AT&T'(RUH72RMOUNTED (P) AT&Y RRUS 12 MOUNTED BEHIND (P)ANTENNA,TYP. O BEHIND (P) ANTENNA, TYP. (TOTAL-16)(STACKEO)(BY OTHERS) (TOTAL-16)(STACKED)(BY OTHERS) DEVELOPMENT SERVICES I A&E SERVICES 92811 - 3350E 21rcA SlreA ' Brea,Celll 121 1216 r]29 B<00 f m t iez �T I L, SITE DevELcaMEnrT \� E- (P) 'SPRINT 65'-0' HIGH MONO-EUCALYPTUS (P) 'SPRINT 65'-0' HIGH MONO-EUCALYPTUS 0 / DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 39IS E..l ',n11 a1#150 B,ea,C@IZ 1a T21 E (E) LIVE TREE, TYP (BEYOND) - P,Oz29www. p.us.co-aaa,rex SII SITE INFORMATION I " SITE NAME: GAS RECOVERY START OF MONO-EUCALYPTUS BRANCHES START OF MONO-EUCALYPTUS BRANCHES SYSTEMS - PERM SITE - - - - ELEV. 15-G'(A.c� �,i5'-D" (A.aL) - - - - - �. (P) 'SPRINT' CABLE ICE BRIDGE SITE CASCADE: I 1 (E) 'SPRINT' WALL OG25XC211 (E) 'SPRINT' WALL MOUNTED CABLE TRAY MOUNTED CABLE TRAY - I II SITE ADDRESS 1 (E) 12'-0" HIGH CMU WALL (E) 12'-0" HIGH CMU WALL 1 20882 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE -r 1 NEWPORT BEACH,CA 9265/ (P) MONO-EUCALYPTUS T (P) MONO-EUCALYPTUS MAT FOUNDATION _ ORANGE COUNTY Z 1 MAT FOUNDATION .�- �- - SHEET TITLE _ I 1 1 - - - FINIGHED GRADE FINISHED GRADE - - -LEv. -.. TLV. o-.. IL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _' ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER A-8 NORTHWEST ELEVATION 1/4-1 0. 0 z 2 NORTHEAST ELEVATION /i.`_"`o ®, 1 ? Y� PA12016-061 Attachment No. PC 8 - Project Plans NOTES: NG16: REV :DATEBY DESCRIPTION oe/os/Is L (P) ED THROUGH CABLES SHALL BE 1, REP)OUTED ED THROUGH CABLES SHALL BE n cRc 166x z9s ROUTED THROUGH (E) CABLE TRAY. ROUTED THROUGH (E) CABLE TRAY. 2. (P) ANTENNAS AND EQUIPMENT 2. (P) ANTENNAS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH (E) SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH (E) SURROUNDINGS. SURROUNDINGS. ENGINEER I CONSULTANT SITE BUILDER Sprint 330 Ca inmerce. Sidle 106 Irvine. CA 92602 A&E DEVELOPMENT (E) 'SPRINT' 1900/800MPANEL o Hz ANTENNA MOUNTED TO (E) CMU DEVELME SERVICES MENTSERVICES WALL TO REMAIN (E) 'SPRINT' 1900/800MHz PANEL ANTENNAS36s E.siren.,,-I e2,6 (P) 'SPRINT' 2SOOMHz PANEL ANTENNA area,cesm.ma 92321 MOUNTED ON (E) CMU WALL TO REMAIN MOUNTED TO (E) CMU WALL TO plapz9_ax90 ealn1a,eaa na. REPLACE (E)ANTENNA (TOTAL-1) w VT_0. (E) "SPRINT' PANEL ANTENNA AND (E) PIPE MOUNT h T.O. (E) 'SPRINT' PANEL ANTENNA AND (E) PIPE MOUNT ELEv. 25-0" (Ac.L) 4 ELEv_ 0° SITE DEVELOPMENT (P) 'SPRINT' 25OOMHZ RRH MOUNTED TO (E) CMU WALL TO EL� (E) AND P 'SPRINT' PANEL ANTENNA RAD CENTER REPLACE (E) RRH (TOTAL-1) E SPRINT' PANEL ANTENNA RAD CENTER _ _ (E) "CLERWIRE' RRH TO BE a. EV, z2'-D" (A.G.L.) - ELEV. a2'-0" (AQ L.) I i (P) 'SPRINT' 190OMHz RRH MOUNTED BELOW (P) 'SPRINT' 80OMHz RRH REMOVED (TOTAL-1) (E) RRH ON (E) CMU WALL (TOTAL-1) W/ FILTER MOUNTED TO (E) (E) 'SPRINT' 190OMT, RRH (P) 'SPRINT' 190OMHz COMBINER MOUNTED BELOW CMU WALL(TOTAL-1) MOUNTED TO (E) CMU WALL (E) 'S EPA RD PANEL ANTENNA TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES (E) RRH ON (E) CMU WALL (TOTAL-1) TO REMAIN (1-TOTAL) BE REMOVED (TOTAL-1) Sera ..'un tOeeeazs, (E) 'SPRINT' 1900MHz RRH MOUNTED ON (E) EMPTY PIPE MOUNT. TTP. (E) EMPTY PIPE MOUNT, TTP. P14F72t-aw cores`IacU-4441 Tex (E) CMU WALL TO REMAIN (1-TOTAL) (E) CMU WALL (E) CMU WALL h T.0 (E) CMU WALL _ SITE INFORMATION - - - - _ - 1 --__-1- _ _ V ELEV. 13'-0" (A.G.L.) _ _ .. _I SITE NAME: ( 1 _ 1 I _ - _-_ J GAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS - PERM SITE E) 'SPRINT WALL MOUNTED - ( - - (E) 'SPRINT' WALL MOUNTED CABLE TRAY TO REMAIN I -- - - - CABLE TRAY TO REMAIN— - - -- SITE CASCADE: _F_T_ -- L -- - _i OG25XC211 _l ____ - SITE ADDRESS:I_ Illi J. 20662 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE FINISHED I I -- NEWPORT BEACH.CA 9265] ELEVAFINISHED 0'-0" (AaL) FCNE 0" (AG,L.) - ORANGE COUNTY SHEET TITLE SECTOR 2 ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER A-9 (P) SOUTHEAST ELEVATION (SECTOR 2) ;`", 6. D 2 EXISTING SOUTHEAST ELEVATION (SECTOR 2) ,.`_";`o D 1 _/ 20 PA2016-061 Att hm nt No. PC 8 - Project PI ns CWaste&�Recycling verizonE • le- m -1 BUIL SAND CANYON AVE. verizonv — BUILDING'D'1s1 FLOOR IRVINE,CA 92618 COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL EQ�o,A NEWPORT RIDGE CELLULAR RELOCATION LA13164D22471 ASPAN ST,II ST.S;LF A92 290 LAKE FOREST,CA92830 VERIZON WIRELESS APPLICANT, '�b DNA ".NA.E 20662 NEWPORT COAST DR. BJMDNGT'•:;WR T-MOBILE APPLICANT (VZW) R •R.G9B•. me•ca%r,AYDAE . . . .Mobile. v'10Ne 19e•I W.11W 14JNE.G4b'. APPROVAL SIGNATURE DATE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92667 ---------------------- SITE 2008 INE,CA 92614 AVENUE--- RE^RESfMATNE APPROVAL SIGNATURE DATE ___ --------- QGENGNc_c_Q � REF4E99RAllla • • BBE ACOJI81MlN aFpl['lfeE4 AlCONBTFI.CT%]N MANOGE4 SIE MQl18UlON LERIZON RIRELESS T MOBILE COIAMJCTOI NANM:Ev PROJECT DESCRIPTION: RFDS TAB DATED:011112016 SITE ACQUISITION: SITE ACQUISITION: RFU3CATE VERIFW ANTENNS.EOUI°MEMIO TEMA]MRYPE91M14NTLOtl.T31 SEOJIIw DE^LOYMENTSERVICESNC COASTAL BUtlWLTOREBB('.ROUn PROJECT DESCRIPTION: REDS TAB DATED:0 311 112 0 1, r V V TNT.RDAES BiREET.BJITE]91 UAGOW10M RILLS,CA A,07RIIABTE"H), RELOCATETAgBLEANIENNSAEO.A^eINTTO TEM"'O¢AW'ERMANEMLIX'I.TV! B lN(c[ORES!.U YAV IAOUNA HILLS.LA'11Gt111]V EYJ9TNG SLtlItE STAU CONTACT C'IEISEAS I0.ttN OWACT: MONICA S^ENCE4 aEMDVE AtL EJ.vsrNc vzv/ANrE_zBwse EOJHRNTI'SELTORI MaenE IIE0145'9B5 OFFICE. 9N9306'S50 24110 MOULTON PARKWAY cue•. mr—M�iN—.vlti��w•n... Fxn-rK o✓wte crF('} RIIITF F1 AH. INsioIL TEMaO4A¢r MCNDIHII�w cONC¢ETE CGOTNG -AcsM - 19AIIIS1Txa 4EM01-ALLE%s*NG TmOBxE ANTENNAS AND c_O.A'MENT LGUNA HILLS.GA 92617,1306 R0.GGTE(1)METING OANEL ANFEIf1A ONTO TEAPO4ARr NIDNO 0.E EMAL T-MOBILE: INBTILL ITINEW aµ0.µTEN1A9 CMO TEF•'OM4Y MplN'(%E INSTNL OINEW Raus eEHrnµrENNAs ABF: CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: TBAVOW.4V 5OE IN.STNLIIINEW HYB4IJ CABLE ED I11NE(WSURGRETCNOYEMENJE 'E1M9NRMYE[ 5333 PASSION CENTER ENTRRD STEWNE. Cb. NSTALLI ^EMVIENTSE µ -MaBETA SfMR81 SW DIEGO I,W-W CONTACT lYEM[ONMOI''NOLYEwJVCGO[rACJEC RE cQ')TIAi OJNIEV LPAATIER NSTAILTE -' MC DNfORWORARVYOIO "OlE 1"E4SECT0¢I Tec no ogy soc ales INBTNL M.INDEUGLYVTUB TREE COMPLY (ASAI v RA. O'-LICE T,A]]INur 4ELOClTE1'TMAIS 40Y/AVE DFi IFS CMOTEWOW,¢Y Y'rAVQ£ REIOUTULPMEVITAI^'M SECIOR CONCIGJRATpN TONEY/N]NOEJfKvvTJB TREE. OSICE. 18AFI»}ZL6%"•vN EMAIL oI.M1e.Clen,mnNTMtlemn - RELOCATE I6ITMA.4ONTO TEYT'1PAQY MOIUa1El0 aER SECl0R1 INSTALL PINEY/RRJ`SµTE-NAS EAML eevml rc. 33DCABO 1-13EDJPLB(ITOTEW A4FA INSTPIL(3INYI R¢US BE-INJ PNIENTAS IKPM 8EC1pR1 RRI,s_l51'.I D O6.rlam®: BAN DIEGO MARKET OFFICE INSTALL',INEY/HYBWD GRLL DME E 5311 MISSION CENTER RD.210 STE 220 IAULVINIIACGE ERATORREBSOR CONTACT INFORMATION '°`E"E'�"" SAN DIEGO.CA 92108 REmoV(I)"D n GENE E1 ANT Gn(.,00•ERI'.L REMOK F%HTNC++µEL NIIEHASIWNTStSEI Gab I'1 IALtiTHL R)N6V/aµELµTENNIS LN 1E1 MOJ1lIb FETA 5ELT091 111tiTILL R)NFW aRJ9 BE'INJµTENIhSIBETA SEClOR1 p •'� + HANDICAP REOUIREMENTS: dE i � S � ~ �,+� "eLL eIOIU EJLALYaTJbTREE FAGLIN IS VMAI NND AND NOT VOR I.AUN Ie ITATXk IRNDF"A`ACCESS REOJRENENRS1 4 ! C Lj .=MATE 1]I N1TBfASB1MAtcq_•I YEW',-IE ONTO M010 EuCNYa1'JB TRE'_ R EWUTE I-)W MICROI/AVE DG1ES FROM TBP vIXE ONTO MOAD EJ y;V J5TREE µ DOBQLAv0.Y � 9 Vw.a.mrP ] 11'SIl•e TAIv 9iR MMR a $ 1 mwaole mAzvIMRu4MTF sR CODECOMPLIANCE 0 .1. '°°•'°""°M' ^E HANDICAP REQUIREMENTS: c.w+° Rev GTE DEwMProN By M F7 -AI:IllTY 4t.1NMIFIEDAW NOT FO4.IJV.N wBDATKN. VNTJCAVAf.CE534EO.H4FMENRs1 CALIFORNIA STATE CODE COMPLIANCE: ti J g ` Lam•-d e ¢ rl(�[w>ALY _` y ALL WORK AND MAMRULSSHALL BE PREFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WTTH + 8,,,,.., •`'a , W TIE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL IS GOVERNINGAUTHBRIT)ES NOTHING INTHESE PUAIISISTOBECONSTRUCTED TOPENMI! _ GENERAL NOTES ��G �v.S`��� WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES. z� 9,-� a/� �. ]01]CAUFORNMBUILDNGCDOE .M1 UL1cORNw cHE CODE A Tib Y •. yT•. ^ �O\ V �V W -p1]GLIPORNw RE81DENML CODE �A`]GUCORNw ENERGY CODE Bene G✓mn TN:CMLITY6JMIJf1EDNO TOTP(NRH,YNI W6RAlpl ATECNCMN YKLVtSRT IESTEAIREO, -N]CALI ORNw PLJ1AM:C0]E -M]GIJCD4Nw PKC-Mlll1[ODE iE ]pv1•vFn c04 RQITINE MANTEHNICE MPRDIEI.T WEl NOT RESULT NAM BRMGKAHr 06TJRBVICEOREccE1.1 O A1]CAUFORNw ELECTRIC CODE �IWS1TMalO[1i UTE8T E'ML]N n SITE ON YiABMGF.W&WTA4Y KYIFRB[RVCE.aOTN1E Y/ATE4.O4 T4ASH D6^OYINREO.%4E]µDNr (- M .IOLAL CODESµEAME"WENTS TN MnpPI C w`Y 1 CCMR4CM1.SII.;-IS NEN/ Bran � i O S FCC NOTE: Lw4nae .,, DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS THIS WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY COMPLIES WITH FEDERL STANDARDS FOR FA'„ r1 a I, nBAvnunrnor uwenR wr�xa 0 RADIO FREQUENCY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TELECOMMUNICATION ACT OF IBES AND .Pe I.Nim Ntr u¢AciNaL«ax n¢w SUBSEQUENT MIENOMENTS AND ANY OTHER REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY STATE OR CONTRACTOR BHNL VERIFY AUL-aLANba Ex6TNGLOCATKKa9.CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE bSWLL _ Ir rt FEDERAL REGULATORY AGENCIES. '•1Vst GuW IMAEDMTELY NOTFYTHE ERGNEER INV/RITNOOF AM DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITRI T e Q Wu,n VIOPot ORBE RE9PONSBLE FOR bOME DRIVING DIRECTIONS VERIZON WIRELESS J \�TOY / SHEET DESCRIPTION NEWPORT RIDGE 0 - NOTTO SCALE - _ -BJ1.DINQD IRT-I TITLE SHEET T-MOBILE I.HEAD800MWESTON DCµrONAVETw/ARDBAR¢NNO N VICINITY MAP LOCAL MAP T-2 GENERAL NOTES LAI 3164D ],TAME THE RNAP ONTOIJR N ].TAME THE CUILVER DR EW C-1 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 4.TURN IE R ONTO C IA,V ER OR x 9.CONTNUEONTO"MACANNON Da PROPERTY OWNER COUNTY: G2 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 20662 NEWPORT COAST DR. B.TIM LEFT ONTO NEWFCRT CGS!DR 'I TMNtE Au.TURN AT BANLO40UN nRLb RO COUNTY OF ORANGE ORANGE COUNTY CA MMA NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92667 DFSTNATIIW Y/LL BE LW THF RM.IT MN WASTEATREETONG A-1 OVERALL SITE PLAN MONOEUCALYPTUS BJITE. 4BD JURISDICTION: M2 ENLARGED SITE PIAN SNNTANM,G 92I0)JID CRYOFNEVNORTBEACH SHEET TITLE 9 PROPERTY CONTACT: A-2.1 VZW 11 T-MOSILE TEMP PLAN FUEMR L� Know what's below. MANAGE,aPEclM PawecTs+EAL EB*Are ZONING: A-2.1 PERMANENT EQUIP PLAN TITLE CALL before yGu d19. 7.4 6MO4MIMY PASTE RECYCIlNB OIENS-ACSICS1 .4n8.1Aa VZW ANTENNA PLAINS SHEET i SITE ADDRESS: SITE PARCEL NUMBER: LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE: A3.1 T-MOBILE ANTENNA PUWS $ CALL AT LEAST TWO WORKING amaNErnORrcOLsr>T 4T60]1.n N1T]B 4Tm-.w 1+r 4smeE M ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER 0 NEY/aORI BFACH.G9�] Y DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG DIG ALERT SITE INFORMATION g SHEET INDEX PI\2016-061 Attachment No. PC 8 - ProJect PI ns GENERALNOTES 1 :N9FMM1;Y!9E.m.P.FRtl.1NVOIWPREWREeENT9PER30,9EBC$LTiCp11tlB9•E-ICEPrSN.I r«9FACk!TTB veriZOn� NQIMSwVYwE9P[GEAEWEM.OKr Br9ERVCk PERYC . XaCRVMY: i99PACk.ROT1OR. r z 15505 SAND CANYON AVE. carEL�crsaRaMlvwe NAL E RPomEo ro-1E WD RENPLuaR ro sueMTTvae�os.AMPRwEEDYq wnNAW wPB BUILDING'D'ist FLOOR 3 +1ECM+PICTbR ERRM rorBrEMN.WPrWr EIBRIIB.DM!ISIPu.oRIT9CRFsucrt9A.Y+rrtx WreEascoWAFD Ix TxE nAN9. _ IRVINE,CA 92618 sRDRcxnow.arorks Pwae+o sFAmroclNsrwJCT!aN lNawmo eln rorLNITFDer wIZLLITG«TNEowrRAcro.sW1.1E ABBREVIATION DEFINITION ABBREVIATION DEFINITION ABBREVIATION DEFINITION ___ -- gE8PIX191■LE Fqi CORRELi!wµYEPAC«9.CMSSCN OR iwOXS!siENLY KTFR TIE BTARr 6IXW9RWLRRI WI4411 W9 wT EEN eNOLTixT i0 TE ATiEMiO11OF i1E NCNiTECr{wNEERAW SXNL iAC11RµY EWkK£9TORECriFYTIIE&NATIX1 r1E I.E,NOp6 CIXBECT!W 9IYLLBE AVPPOVFD Br TE Mf.Ni1EC'glr]E kNO:NFE«R910N9'BLEO rIEgIgECi AB. ANGIDH SCAT F/b. cABgILATIIXyDRI PSL POWpS PER SQUARE NCH A MOR TO STµTIw OCNSTRLGTro L THE CIXirMG TOR INV T REYPO IEL"•0 LOCRTE.LLL EASTIWO WF HER.w11EHEA w MT FEW, ABOVE FF. cNISH FLOOR PT PRESSURE TREATED 9 ON TER APO To ,EC,TIFNFIWMDVM4F T«E COIrtWC'IXL pi SU■CIXITMLrptNWLBEIR TE ENFN9E lF AC(µ ANIENW CABLE GOVE4AESEABLY FG. PMH CRAZE PWR, POWER(CABNET) RP.ARWO ORRPLACM AF ORNAGE 10TIE to WTEB GLygO DUR.'M EAEWTCY1 Cf THE RQRL CIXRACT VBA pO NERr O Awl ADJ?ICNN. FN FN6H(EO) RY OU SEQUOIA ay, 4FXO Al F. ABOVE'WISHED LOOR FLK FLOOR RAO.IR) RADIUS A.FG. FERNS-"LSH:D OWE FON FO TCN REF. REFERENCE 9 FRIRLTOSTµnwCp6tq)CTNIIIEGCN,WGTgLNY1L PROTECT ALLµ FRW.I ON�IMENNICNWY O:LTROLRNO AL1MA ALNANJIA iOC. FACE OF CONCRETE RENF. RENFORCEMENNNGI O]/LeLLI]w1 fILn0A 1wC CGBTRJCTp µr OMWOE TO PRWOEO OtEXe 9UIEAES BTRLICT S OR EWPeEIIT BINU.BE iM PATRY PEPADED OR KT. PLT_NWTe FOM. FACE Oc RIkSONRY RECTD. REOJIREO REPLACED TO THE 8AT16ACTI0H a THE PRCPERY OFNEFt THE CMIRAC'wbNALL BEAR THE EXPENSE OF REPARMO OR RENUOM NR. AMEIIN POB. FACE OF STUD RGS. RIGID GALVAAHMO MEL 22471 ASPAN ST.STE.290 µYp>A,AOOEpµEAB AP AeeROXIWTeRLY) FO W, [ACEOFWM RRU. RADA REMOTE INR LAKE FOREST,CA92830 ARCH ARC4fTEECTIJi j FA FNBNS,RFACE SGL. SGrtJJLE B A COPT OF r1E ApM1p.ED PLANE SHALL.E I N APT.ACE SPiCF ED BY TE N hGATFNLY MO IT LMV SIBfL BE A LABLE FOR ANG. AMERICAN WIRE GAJCE R.G FCGNFEETI Be SHEET NEWECTIOPP'ALL TME ii 18 TEMORKTOle1ESOAiB'l..Y'ONAl1E NE COBITNA:iIp1ET1REPLECr TE BME BLDG, UDEC [TO. FOOTING SN SECAR WFOAPP-(NAY'FE«sR0.EDFLMO,]E fDIRRICTOt 9NNl ALSO Wn'Ax OEBEi fI NNYA+TE BIE FtlI+1E NANtO IRKBLOCI[ O. GROVRHICIJEIET) S°EC ■^EcPHCAOPq■1 OwLE N'AI ALL As-BVL"CIW4e RVgYIN ADIF]M CNOPNOE OOW+IECMIRAC+ORIMLFDNWOIK ■IRO. .LOCxlll(i GA GAJGE a0 SOJARE • ■ ■ ■MOblle ■ ABaVt'NXtu wNwwY'o TEN1ONEcr O1 TEEM]EER TEBNBaLLa TERWCECr Ar T1E G}pUNp16,lEPwECr EI BEM Go OAVNI�ADI SS SYANLESS MR BH. aOUYDNir NALNG 01 . GRGND FA:T CM ff NTERR. 4 sn STANDARD ] TE COPF.ICR NWL EiEIp{NE FOR THE W 1BEgIRI1w TE YTENNLE TaNWLiI«PIUOIESSIN•a'M A)3 ■TCW. BARE TNNEO COPPER WRE OISREULAM) GULM TEDBEAM ST. sna 2008 McGRAW AVENUE CtlRE'E S.O.F. BORCM OF FOOTING Gn CLO■H°OBRCNNC srs[EM STYJC STRJLTJRA w BAc CABNET GWO OR TE TEMPORAR IRVINE,CA W614 e THE CONTRACTOR 31E>a(1BlIE TO NOVIF TEEWWLY FPrNl WATMRN DET FAC%ff"ASEWAED Ex-RE PROPERTY CAB. CABINET HM -FADER rK T1C&PEESSR _________________ OLRERORGOVEWtMAOMLY CRIT. CANrEEVER(EO) HM 'ANGER TW TOWERMO:NTEOMPUFIER C.I.P. CAST NPIACE M. YEILM TN TOETML B ALC061WFCTICN TRWIOITE NUECT SIYLL COEOBI TATE LAIFyTCBC NOAIO']EH tRhEINNG LmEs NLlwNG IE CW' CELM EXE& LRCLATEO CO"PERGRRNDBIB TOA TOP O=ANSHPA CXPONwKYNSOgTrvECWFB rREe 1G.pElx'K MRTIEBTKrIW CODE 81WlOONN CLN CLEAR NO NC•IIE81 TOC. Tm OFCJ 1p iIE C(y1fgAC+Q{NA NNWF'IVL'W s14LLLCWlY MT11 NLL NA4•ATF IEaLA'0N9 NQIAM N10alN 1EWiE14N'S COP LRCM M. POEN"WTERDA TOP TO'+OF PCATS ARA COT1L. CONCRETE re PONDISI TOP TOP OF;OJN IAARAPETI 11 MIEMROWIED STOLAO LY W'W ALY u:L 'HEY E FANNY DS'.W'W M.'RE I LOR d ICO W AS W CONN CON«ECTFooORI L• LMaB0.T8 TDs TOA OC MR EACEBO THEROLA LOWYRLN"Rs'181C'�IE IEEf01WD'910tw O1NUCMMWIBE N10v1yOTMlE'Rs'I81C.UE CONSIT COIHTR,XmcN L[ LNFAR[■RIFOGTI TOW. TOP OF WAL Em HAS wT AITARED'R OS UN 9'REHO'M N M rR COO'OB NEeNN• LOIT. LONTINJDUS L. IONGAT,OEW) 1TP. TYaILµ OR e PEM1r JO'm Mµ9. Y/tOM OO J«DE.GROJND B 1] TR OERWC,OR ABEL A 9LLFIrvsk NA CNMMAL E2 VEI.RIKw XS NOH,ss.AOWuD A I..RE A" Om DOJBLE 1µC. MAYEtN Ul- JMDE4wRrtERS UBORPrri_. • • REBRWBNE FOWL wIHTWC"OI MFAINB tETIEOB.TEOE[OA:9 Ne70DME9 AQ E0E]CMAp f.COpW'M N1 DEPT. DEPAHTMEM MB. NA? Nctt ONO. .MESSMTED OPE W,I._ Pgt„060 TE RPLtULEA.«k WUECT OF, D,JGLAS FIR NRH. MECH Vu. V RR- 24310 MOULTON PARKWAY DW DDMMR MFR MAEFALI'.NER W V/L}_NI:']T41gD .NRF FIWNW IJ THE CyRRACR)k SHALL ERSPORSWA,'I*WAN NO MY FOR ALL PE,M'S LO SAO] C OS mrN FEBFEV M THE ONO. DMGONLL MN YMEM WR VIR4 LAGUNA RILLS,GA 92637,11306wOacTO LO■ jTHE wEC'..M PMWeA QATONS.E I LEDer-R OWER OR Akf L FQMC CORBMCTOR ON OMENsm MISC. 4NCEW1EO.b W0. WOOD BRNL LB'AN'E PEN•r AO RAE I PA PAL OSAV 000~E DWG. DRAWNCRSI MR METH. WD, WEAT.IER-4001 0WL DOW EUSR �1R NJWA WT. v1EGIT M µNONAN OA rMB NE4E1[[A OVBRECNE ORWFUGOAEMT'aE 9GYED VE;M MIY CIElIW'ApE EA FACrI NOLO NIABEH E' CEME'tm EL ELEVATFW NTS. NOTTONILE B PLATE le 'RIYNIRIACTOLaNYLPMV'ENLRCf9aNnlCQIgSA000FRIMM.lY1IilOOLS1iIOGDF0110TAL1A,OMffIOLO REC. ELECTRICAL OC. ONCENTER Technology Associates HO'CA-bOONTEOA". NEYELEVATOR O[N0OA . . EWR' EMT. ELECTRXCA METNLCTIEO IPI xOAOSFD R6 IRItlNrRACTOL yyLL NOYE rE1RAMtlXNLmTXVL MNIL4EO W'FRA9.ONLLINILPbE'MTOe®'RNOpNF1E EN. EDGENAE PC AiECAST C.00iETF W'EDAl90HE5 EM. ENCNEER N3 AE2"-0FNL CO.EIJNCATON SENCE9 n PrGNNSDCPsrrxA:nPN SEED TC ExswLVNs-wcTwswvLE W-IaEG«Fara-Es-LWE W-kHALAAPANrmat 'G. EQLL FLY. cLrWCOD SAN DIEGO MARKET OFFICE ExIVTAsro•ED NTRE PLAIB FAV. EXPAOCN PPC 'C,'= �HTRT1ONVENEr 5353 MISSION CENTER RD.STE 220 �RPN.RY RA LA■NE1 u TE CORRA:rORQroNEYI(¢FURrALEF9E El(•14T1'9Ef6 MWMAMNMN]AICicM-MW..-N«]s-O-HEEL-a Nl EM�I EAAT�ERGR PSE. AOJFf1b PER WD 4r-COT SAN DIEGO.CA 92108 PORION ECTIIN 6HR.1 TE COAEA lau ac E .'a"Aw TAO ECTGNwa u u WTNLAIa rEerMNWLEroTREurEsr NNOMBSAVALAIt AIRWNEOer'RE ta(%I OO.FRNwALRN(:Y R9oPOElF01 A'P1RwuNG rR ReuTe ]O AUIENBVIM+E■Aro ErNONO ETAU AE TE MxY1N RgpEEEMIaroEVEO«COND:CMS.MFCNAE roT IERNMLr NImWNa'IERfrFE ] ir.yn'F TRIP 9iTEMMR NL ]I ALDFIM1SAAIEiLeE 6i0ERE0/F➢FNONi1dATM1 rWES 1 osBaxBle wxzvl rvouaW BR. n WADM IBYFCTO AFBLCRCTRgWwMONCW9AE TOE MrIWFftOI TDANYaRIpOAOCONBTW.C'tlIHFOTAB 0 OY 1. rtgxzCNMeINumN R Mva*w n rR ObrENIMIAEN:Y N CPB OtND OYO•,,,G,O1LM,11rfTEpNO,EAW,,,BC,O1„NAD„E„ON ROI/ONO ABBREVIATIONS 1 DATE D■■CI]N°TEJN By rR RUIGr NUNM TILE ApF rtC'{R'RE VNp]EtNRyuBEE O MPOdGT NYLIE MTPMi01 OAN{�GTPO ]L 8"t CCR'RACTOL'OCNl pOALER'll•roNAs9El1'OIOCA•E NNY AOFLL UIFAOIOEOVA*EB MNT TOAIY EACAVATOL �y N ALL 1 Av L'"ES-OW w-µLED NE I}MMED M IE:PMLM SPI�B NLL E LEO W rEMWO■Y T«'9MOECr O M PROR a"RESW,A C`ARPWNS-NIC-LWF0BR Y"R MPL'CNR 9INLL NCOWCA'k Nn LOB'NM:'CN EBT MVNADFIHR _T`V ( SSS/` EMG-(£Y ECEasNL/-a CO.RY,r'N-R C-YS M,M C FA COLE Ifa lE 1:06'IWC-ON WN601 BPECF.CATf/IS O`�` �11T/J\v�\O� F Q PROPOSED ANTENNA O e.p x'ecEREICE _ CENTE.INE ,1 O -N-NO x ]] PROP'c-IE SWAKFPANr w]B',aG-01 NAM-S-RAFRLWSMAI RIW"AwA�WPCLLV'OX CON'RO PLAN VRmI THE \_"I`_ JC' 2 1rV(Y gALLL E F1E'FNEa NA.COO.W.Y Iv'M"R CHOL R9 NNTkXDA t P"R C'YY Y"OM WA'W E'NOIIOE ]e T«.S Nu]Ev'IMLA` Sk RFMAL. EN- 1.Na P%R''.IM'EG Y'w•.W.I W'PRN'FOLTISDICETONAN 41 ER9TINCµTEHY. --� PgpPE.TY LF/SELNE O JETAL REFE.EICE N!V kIv Aw'MIRI lNk IXR9 wNkW R FM"Pk1•WEX'S'lNN"A'W E9'1M,NEkIN'NMC'iPH A ]9 rM9 M64C'NYY61Ebw wPB w'NN'E ItIE CRPI'O ArAr ® GROUNDNOD MATL'I LEL Ii OT` El2vATRON eFEi?NCE �\ D T[ GROUNOBJS BRR A n1 VM • MECHANICAL GRM.CCTN CAROM CONJJCIOR I' Iyy, ,' I BECTON BI REFERCE I r wuu o-n Po-:u,Il'wa ■ CAONEIC T TfiEA.ICNE CLNJJIT 9 O GM.rt oR MTTER > GROUMACCESSWEIL E ELFCTOOK CONTRT ® D IEIBROL IPCWERR VERIZON WIRELESS p ELECTRICS _ A - CwxAv.EE NEWPORT RIDGE IEIMABCNAY t cELi yE T� TELEM ONE Wx O COMLRM —''F PO4ER AO FBEx T-MOBILE i TE — OWE.HEADMRVICE LAI 3164D LGIe POE O ),{Tv CONDJCTOi4 A — GIANUNLFEIGNG 20662 NEWPORT COAST DR. O Fw MONLMENT 0 cRA'M ---Co—D— WOOD FENCE NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92667 —�—�— OrcRrE.LC AOAFER Off MONOEVGKYFTVG SPOT ELEVATION O 'MPOOO —W— BJRIED POWER LNE SHEET TITLE x p SET PONT O SAID —Ort— OVE4HEADTREI FNELNE GENERAL O W D WOCOR —LOT— B.NLDFRI'_RNELNE REVBICN mBR DWATERLNE NOTES WDOD EOOLNG i —a— BJxo swarARr S;�/.ER RA ®MR —a— B.PiFD 5TOi1DAN SHEET L]_? GENERAL NOTES 3 LEGEND 2 PA2016-061 Attachment No. PC 8 - Project Plans I / BONITA CANYON OR I I I / / Boundary Detail SHADY CANYON DR I I / SCALE: 1"=80' verizon% I Site 73 I - - - - _ I— — 2785 MITCHELL DRIVE \ \ WALNUT CREEK, CA 94598 \ PLANS PRE PARED BY: SAN JOAQUIN HILLS RD o�`oP H/llS�9NS�°ORT9no I S833 '19=E 19272'— —� \ \ \ \ \ \ GRAPHIC SCALE - 0 N SSR/D I _� \ \ \ \ \ \ 80 0 40 80 _ __ Technology Associates — _ \ 58338'19"E 188.4g'�\ \ \ \ I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ FEET SAN DIEGO MARKET OFFICE v 5473 KEARNY VILLA RD. STE. 300 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 Vicinity Map PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET Title Report I \ \ - 64 OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY&CONFIDENTIAL TO SPRINT ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO SPRINT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT. PREPARED BY: ORDER NO.: PROJECT INFORMATION: DATED: I I 11 \ A.P.N. 478-031-72 \� \ I ; ' ► \ 0A6�0� �-35 `0, B �\ NEWPORT RIDGE Legal Description I �'�\ \ A.P.N. 478-031-68 015°i ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, '2 \ DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: D'11932Z`J \ \ \ \ PARCEL A - GRS PARCEL I r�^ I I C / 0� B THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING THAT PORTION OF BLOCK 128 OF IRVINE'S SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN ON Q H 1 \ ` / , \ / \ 20662 NEWPORT COAST DR., A MAP THEREOF FILED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 88 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORD MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: I O I / �Y�3, \ NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92667 ALL OF THE PARCEL SHOWN AS "EXCPTION PARCEL 4", AS DESCRIBED IN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED I I I I O \AO+ \ ORANGE COUNTY "GIFT DEED (PRESERVATION AREA L: PA 27 DETACHMENT AREA PORTION)", RECORDED MAY 16, I I I 14` ' 4� \ 2002 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20020413370 IN SAID OFFICE OF THE ORANGE COUNTY RECORDER. i7 PARCEL B - GRS PARCEL (ACCESS ROAD) I O I I II Q0 a<v%/ �,'O / \ \ ISSUE DATE: THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, J ��� / � I I I I o \ STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING THAT PORTION OF BLOBK 128 OF IRVINE'S SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN ON B A� �' '�� 0 5/ 12/2016 A MAP THEREOF FILED IN BOOK, PAGE 88 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORD MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF 3 THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: I I I I ��/ j��� p�/ \ DO *,,,� \ \ ISSUED FOR: I Z I PARCEL B /hA 00 / \ ALL OF THE PARCEL SHOWN AS "EXCEPTION PARCEL 1", BEING A 30 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND, � ry 1L AS DESCRIBED IN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED "GIFT DEED (PRESERVATION AREA L: PA 27 I I (PER TIRE REPORT) / PARCEL A DETACHMENT AREA PORTION)", RECORDED MAY 16, 2002 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20020413370 IN A.P.N. 478-031-73 � DESIGN SAID OFFICE OF THE ORANGE COUNTY RECORDER. I I ,1 ` / / I �. (PER TITLE REPORT) \ \ \ \ t \\ o A.P.N. 478-031-71 \ I I I A.P.N. 478-031-68 �� \ r"'REVISIONS Assessor's Parcel Nos. I I " I � � o�'a� 478-031-71 & 478-031-73 REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY 0 05/12/16 SUBMITTAL AV Easements L=509.3 OA EASEMENT FOR RECLAIMED WATER TRANSMISSION PURPOSES RECORDED OCTOBER 23, 1991 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 91-577486. (PLOTTED I / 1 \ 0 S HEREON) I I / \ O ® // © EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS PURPOSES RECORDED OCTOBER 23, 1991 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 91-577487. (PLOTTED HEREON) I / y / H I �O\ AN EASEMENT FOR RECLAIMED WATER TRANSMISSION PURPOSES, RECORDED MARCH 1 1993 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 93-0139588 OF © OFFICIAL RECORDS. (DOES NOT AFFECT PROPERTY) I / // / \ G EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES RECORDED JUNE 22, 1993 AS INSTRUMENT LICENSURE: W Op NO. 93-0417679 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (PLOTTED HEREON) / / / �f A CONSERVATION EASEMENT RECORDED JULY 7, 1994 AS INSTRUMENT N0. / w OE 94-0443160 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (DOES NOT AFFECT PROPERTY) 5 O SLOPE EASEMENT RECORDED MARCH 16, 1993 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 93-0174937, O.R. AND MODIFIED SEPTEMBER 3, 1993 BY I I I \ See Lease Area Detail INSTRUMENT NO. 93-0598813, O.R. AND NOVEMBER 20, 1996 BY INSTRUMENT NOS. 19960584100 & 19960585938, BOTH O.R., ANDCALVADA w AGAIN AUGUST 30, 1BY INSTRUMENT on Sheet C-2 SURVEYING, INC. ffi NO. 19990628376, O.R..R. (DOES NOT AFFECT PROPERTY) EASEMENTS FOR INDUSTRIAL WASTE AND POTABLE WATER PIPELINE PURPOSES RECORDED JANUARY 19, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NOS. I I \ 411 Jenks Cir.,Suite 205, Corona,CA 92880 © 89-033573 AND 89-033574, BOTH OF O.R. SAID DOCUMENTS DESCRIBE THE COYOTE CANYON GENERATING PLANT SHOWN HEREON o WHICH ALSO PERTAINS TO ITEM NO. 23 AS AN UNRECORDED SUBLEASE WITH CERTAIN C, C, AND R'S RECORDED DECEMBER 18, 1996 I / Phone:951-280-9960 Fax:951-280-9746 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 19960636164. (PLOTTED HEREON). _ _ Tall Free:800-CALVADA www.calvada.com o O AN EASEMENT FOR UTILITY PURPOSES, RECORDED MAY 1, 2002 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2002364422 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.(PLOTTEDHE I I� JOB N0. 16301 o I / LINE TABLE ANREASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS, RECORDED AUGUST 17, 2005 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2006000551144 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. I / CURVE TABLE LINE# DIRECTION LENGTH 0 (PLOTTED HEREON) / / / CURVE # RADIUS DELTA LENGTH LB 50176'17 13268' C7 165.00' 553551' 160.11' Basis Of Bearings r I n SHEET TITLE: N S L9 "6'rE 13168' g C8 ' � 555'. '�'� TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY _ THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATES SYSTEM (CCS 83), ZONE 6, L10 S56"5208� 49.27' Access Route/Lease Area I / / / 1983 DATUM, DEFINED BY SECTIONS 8801 TO 8819 OF THE CAUFORNIA PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE. C9 60.00' 1343900' 141.01' L11 55652'08'E 49.27' = i0 BE DETERMINED \ / C10 90.00' 1343900' 111.51' L12 5774652'W I 1887 C11 90.00' 1617571' 25356' Bench Mark L13 S7746'52V 1887 SHEET NUMBER: REVISION: THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON THE COUNTY OF ORANGE COUNTY L14 50141�� �. C11 60.00' 16175'11' 169.04' Date of Survey �/ BENCHMARK NO 37-8-91, ELEVATION = 551.37 FEET (NAVD 88). o MAY 04, 2016 I i 0 z 423 PA2016-061 Attachment No. PC 8 - Project Plans / . 79220TW 77882FS \ / 779.52N6 82J 26TOP / 792.24 TW CR \ \ 779.20NG / BLOCK WALL \779.01FS verizon%l 784 1370P,• \ 779.60NG •779.56NG 800.50TOP el O \ / PROPANE TANK �l'F�y ipie , '911 `p-/ c DIRT/BRUSH \ PIPE EXHAUST(7YP) 779.79NG \ 2785 MITCHELL DRIVE / / O 780.08FS GRAVEL x779.41FS 779.45Fsx fPe``®77905NG \ WALNUT CREEK, CA 94598 \ / 83399TOP 828.49 TOP \ PLANS PREPARED BY: TREE 800.45 TOP PIPE EXHAUST TREE 779.95FS mm / 780.06NG a x 779.33FS `L \ \ / Technology Associates PIPE LINE / 793. 780.J9FS 779.99FS x 7BG.29FS LADDERDER �G SAN DIEGO MARKET OFFICE .Aqo �? / x 780.97NG - EQUIPMENT ® , x �.> \ \ / BOX 78202 TOP �® c ASPHALT�� 779.59FS 779.21FS >>� \ 5473 KEARNY VILLA RD. STE. 300 779.931VG PAD R3 /` 828.87TOP / EP 779.94FS MH _ /QPQ EPB \ c TREE \ \ SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 GRAVEL 780.17FS �- DIRT/BRUSH�j n MH / p " CANOPY EC x 779.98FS ,_ TOWER EP PROPRIETARY INFORMATION / 796.77TOP x 780.35FS ll,. 779.48FS /PAD/ 780.87FS 9iy -r o GRAVEL 780.45FS !/yam THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET 780.21FS OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY 8 CONFIDENTIAL 840.02TOP 780.13NG x 7B0.14NG 793.89TW TO SPRINT ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN / TREE 1�Q� 7 780 64F 779.9ONG x GRAVEL AS IT RELATES TO SPRINT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED F x 780.21FS 779.92NG x 779.17FS �'- DIRT/BRUSH VV / � PUMP BF ® ��P�Q P\��� GRAVEL• POLE •779.45Fs PROJECT INFORMATION: SYSTEM MH 780.59FS 828.53TOP VO 780.08NG EC 780.57NG 779.86NG 780.33FS 788.93TOP 11111111• V�IR ZD X o <� 11111 80.40NG NEWPORT RIDGE \ 824.33TOP I EPB 111111 k 779.92NG } GRAVEL \ TREE PAD 7B0.42FS III 792.51 TOP / 111 \ GRAVEL , I / ? �77963FS ASPHALT V ,V 780.9TC GREASE TRAP yl� 778.97FS780o1.4 COOLER'. 780.6726 TOP / 5'�� �O�V 780.35FS 2 OVERHANG 10 / / 0� 1 /P� GRAVEL A / \ COOLER 111, 11 / 1 �� II/ �� F� 77983FS / li 20662 NEWPORT COAST DR. / \ EP �8J.43FS JPO.' 11111 BUILDING 111 P� '� �,�5 §0- C70p, 'py0,'.,,. 7BO.00NC11111 1111111111 \\\ , 11 780.69FS 111 779.77FS / 779.25FS NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92667 EP IIT GRAVfL`� � " �5r / 1 I1' ORANGE COUNTY x 780.44FS 780.74NG PAD 17780.60TW � ; EPB / \ 111111 1111 P c �1 ��5. GRAVEL / 111 V 111 779.43FS . i A py 1111 LANDING V� X111 P9 �9� 779.99FS LANDING 780.84FS •' - � � 796.82TOPl illi. � � /n` V // � 111111 S��V�Q � � 779.31FS dl�� ISSUE DATE: DOOR 780.51FS �� 111 �.;~ BOZB4TOP 11111 F5 / 94 5/ 12/2016 \ I sy x780.71NG 111 ASPHALT ..T''" 1111 ANTENNA i1�y0 / 11111 11111 DOOR GRAVEL ISSUED FOR: 780.59FS �' 1111 800.1970P1111 V 7P ' 780.43FS 780.68FS ;. 111 EXISTING MH 779.66NG DESIGN \ ( GPS ANTENNA l PULL BUILDING 79.88FS GRAVEL 15.59 TREE°P ~ 4.� syF 1. GPS ANTENNA ,780.70FS 11111 III O ;, 780.12FS BOX 37TW \ \ / �V MH .} . 792. <` 780.18FS" ` 1�. PAD J�IGUARD 780.72FS -11111111 MH n // � ANTENNA C�REVISIONS \ POST(TYP) METAL PLATE PIPE LINE 804.62TOP � / \ < <^OG / 780.26FS1 \ \ \ \ a�F2T9 // s�Gya 779.53NG 'DRAIN 798.826 TV REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY INLET 0 5/12/16 SUBMITTAL AV ✓ PIPE VERT SAGdfo 779.60NG \ ' ASPHALT \\ // (TYP) n ��0 Jas // 779.80FS �; _ 9p 779.79FS 8458070P \ / TREE 826.6870P 780.40FS / Legend G TREE EP \ ` \\\ / 01 `PUMP APN ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER ® AIR CONDITION/NG UNIT \ \ �.�,r \ / SYSTEM / s' / /�780.14F5 BFV BACK-FLOW VALVE ANTENNA CELL \ `\ PIPE EXHAUST MH '( �: � BIM BOTTOM OF S7RUCIURE BACK-RDW VALVE \ 88550TOP \ �% D1 DRAIN INLET CENTER LINE 83274TOP \ 820.66FS � MH QJ`0 EB ELECTRIC BREAKER D CONCRETE PAVEMENT \ \ TREE 80.28FS moo\ <780.05FS Q�0 / LICENSURE: w EC ELECTRIC CABINET DISH ANTENNA "\ PIPE VERT F� EM ELECTRIC METER 0 DRAIN INLET 780.SOFS \ lF� \ ( � S� i EP ELECTRIC PANEL ® ELECTRIC CABINET \ c 9�oy�9l C \ EMS \, O�J�� B49.07TOP .�// o EPB ELECTRIC PULL BOX CI FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION ! \ /) R FLOW LINE 00.1 FIRE HYDRANT \ \ 780.78FS 780.37FS `�sr 5 FS FINISH SURFACE l�.iv� GATE %P2. ` S TREE w 827.73TOP C9B \ / 799.77TOP Q� ffi MH MANHOLE • GUARD POST \ �BFGsy TREE ^ meq` - J BFV OT OVERHANG TOP LADDER \ SURVEYING y. TO TELCO PANEL \ - .' ,7BO.SIFS / S��YEYING, INC. CIGHT 411 Jenks Cir.,Suite 205, Corona,CA 92880 TC TOP OF CURB �mm POST INDICATOR VALVE V \Y 82542TOP 780,4 IFS Phone:951-280-9960 Fax:951-280-9746 o TOP TOP OF STRUCTURE PROPERTY LINE \ BFV TRE£ Tall Free:800-CALVADA www.calvada.com o TW TOP OF WALL S SEWER MANHOLE 0.46NGHANDRAIL �, / TR TRANSFORMER STA/RS SHOWING (' \ pqD ' Fla o IT TYPICAL DOWNWARD DIREC77ON Z \ PAD� ; x 78082FS''.BFV Jh� JOB N0. 16301 ,< EDGE OF PAVEMENT ® TRANSFORMER } \ 780.71NG 0� W 50 78B.SONG GAS CINE PAINTED TREE Q\ / Ec=> WHIP ANTENNA fLfC7RlC LINE PAINTED m(P) STORM DRAIN LINE PAINTED \ � x780.32NG SHEET TITLE: 780.987C HANDRAIL . yt \ as.G2F LANDING -* x- CHAINLINK TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ---- PROPERTY LINE 6J ---- - INTERIOR LOT LINES \ x 7B0.50NG x 780.27NG - RIGHT-OF-WAY \ 839IREE P PROPANE a -- EASEMENT LINE GRAPHIC SCALE \ DOOR TANK BLOCK WALL / o CONCRETE WALL 20 0 10 20 \ SHEET NUMBER: REVISION: FELT \ 84TOP TREE / o / C =2 0 z 42 ' P A2016-061 Attachment No. PQ 8 - Proiect PI ns DISCLAIMER verizonv THESE DRAWNOS WERE PRODUCED VRMOUT THE 9ENEFrt OF 15505 SAND CANYON AVE. A CURRENT WiDSURVEY.ALL PROPEFOY LINES.EASEMENTS. BUILDING•D•15I FLOOR NiOSETBLfXb SINtI SE VERRIEO PgpR TOSTARtOF caNST(tU(.TION.TAEC ODES N]rDwPANrEETHE ACCURAcr IRVINE,CA 92618 OFgtp PgOPEgTY INE5.EA5EMENfS.ROA050NDbElSROfS. SEQUOIA D.no..,v Pana!Lc 22471 ASPAN ST.STE.290 LAKE FOREST.CA926M pgD•ER,y • • ••Mobile• "'- 2008 McGRAW AVENUE IRVINE,CA 92614 ------------------- A ________________• '�. 24110 MOULTON PARKWAY CI IITF n MN LAGUNA HILLS,CA 92637-3306 W E,6 IDND Technology 4%Associates ^, D SAN DIEGO MARKET OFFICE - -. 5333 MISSION CENTER RD.STE 220 Q SAN DIEGO.CA 92109 U ••/ _ 1r.yn•e TRIP 9iTC IlMR 9q •Q4. SEMMES simmism, omamle 9Y1E01 Nowam pa d = o9a9R9�e ,mxzox9owumN aN 3 8cp` DATE DEDORI'TON 9T IRA O N e GD S W `� J nW Th�A1R�FOINIFP NY O{CIRN C �N aYQ WOIN[f P10W F1,D.f10. y OM11N MpCCWIM. 3 IfIVEW uTNC�L� 9 ARM SMEE BEARDED f AREA BEE ENIMOFD •^E Pw+. VERIZON WIRELESS NEWPORT RIDGE T-MOBILE LA13164D 20662 NEWPORT COAST DR. NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92667 MONOCVCKYF'TVO SHEET TITLE 0 SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBI SITE PLAN ® �- 1 100' 0 50' 100' xcALE ,--,•a.o-oNom P 6,2016-061 Attachment No. PQ 8 - Project PI ns , \ J \\\ verizon / \ 15505 SAND CANYON AVE. BUILDING'D'1st FLOOR IRVINE,CA 92618 / TNI REMVI VL TEM?ORARYVZVI'TAIOSLE \\ / AOBILE iENP ?POlECf 4REN.5EE 0.PI15. SE ' *O] / MONOPOLE• \\ J QU A FWRORTIONICELL e \ O]ILeaYtwl f]Lnwp lwL (E"7 HIGH— \ 22471 ASPAN ST.STE.290 IIERAISTIER♦ eA�wAaL ,A ' C ` \ LAKE FOREST,CA92M / \ SPREO4AT.T T ••Mobile• MPORAar \ POLE L,= / 20I INE,CA AVENUE / PER SEPARw]E ' \\\ ____ IRVINE,CA--- / RAN ❑ • ____ IRI VLW GEWEATOR / / CO]VOVND / -TE11wUL.iY ' - / ' SLERVE W / ]u uRRIE- 24110 MOULTON PARKWAY Pa LAPINE E GR POLI LAGUNA MILLS.CA 92837-3308 � FOOvrExr coNPaRa f � . \\ �, TechnologyOWAssociates ♦ -IEI WtaMG- ". IEIVZWPOWEPTAp® _ SN11C«GEAR IWOE IN IPERMI VZW,-AON.E OE.E.nuroM- CONTROL WILOING SAN DIEGO MARKET OFFICE \\\ MororucALmTas AREA O 5333 MISSION CENTER RD.STE 220 `\ - IE)TAOBIL1 POWFPTGp O SAN DIEGO.CA 92108 \\ aSWaCHGFMMSIM JEMOLRNtN- `/' ` CONTROL RVI LWIO - Ai=A '-- IMI T YOBM1EiF R /\ /- awlrc«aEAP SUBAEMSIOF C �� mACCMn0 ?ER1AV91f VjYI:TAOBLE-� E BJLOtlY(i- ` \ ] ir.yn•p TAIp 9iTEMMR wROIECf AREA SEE p4Ms `\ \ + OYI e mxzwmoupan a0.` - icI B.ILJWG- • o oxm1.+e +wxzaxWGMRumW Ea \\ 0 } Rev wTE DEwNPr1DN ar IEI VZV]EO.N'MEM ` ` _ - IEI+I NOH _ •dYOE S"FLYER \ n' r BIOflLW41 / -� _I IEIEQJPLEM]4ELTE0. O 10r OTE9 CARPl:i1 Y� IEISWYLOW TRENCH w_ \ ` -IEIGaRELOVERY ® .(O f_\� RROUIM EQUIP ME TO RFWM M AREATO OE Y ` 1\ DE IOLIS'AD- �V G W \\ \\\\ 381. ER ATEA- / 65>w Jr'W ACr�n l+v:ra.x +I wa ? IMITAL'01LE PONERREAgIipa -f \\ '-�\\ � / VERIZON WIRELESS FR(lYFT6TCppgIroALOIOOLL --\ NEWPORT RIDGE MTO RIEIMLLOYITRENLNe KOMO \ �\ // IEI HALL TOIq 9NILUOWTRERII \ / FOR all C0110{Lp \ / / T-MOBILE LAI 3164D \ / NEWPORT COAST NEWPORT 667 MONOCUO.KlLymuo (E)SHONE VAM TOM OEMOLU«ED'. \\ / ALL VZN1 TAOMLE AN,ENIAa MO SHEET TITLE A Epl/IENT TO BE RFLOCRTEO \ IEIEQJIPMENT \\ �.: ; ENLARGED II O"NLARRIER) \ v ' SITE PLAN i v«OrOs®LouTanap / PB aPRxnATOT roLE / \ N (PER SEPARATE REAIE / SHEET NUMBER Y ENLARGED SITE PLAN m 0 10' 20' acALE A=2 P 4,2016-061 Attachment N . PC 8 - Project PI ns FACILITY DEMOLITION NOTE: verizonNI NI,fEEE,Vi1M•T4EOBILETFTiV _ J.x;T BANI:RFM1 MOMOPOLI✓1MCIMtlLOMIL6ll \ 11 T4E l£MPOMRY SRE NBTµ1pTION VIRL TPNE PIACEEEGOREFJiYDi IEI:REEBTNiJNG MAN IUL-NO) AOCILEITD SOFECOEXMU I I DORM DEM0.RpNOPERMIRIS..LLL GREFNJ OLIGENLEVIILLBE 'ERIMETERCMJVIAU- _IOJCT BN1t:a01.1 15505 SAND CANYON AVE. vERMglEwi EfrE COIEEpE{N EMROYEO TO ENSURE SAFETY IROTIED 000LS ARE CC VIIM. L — I — 90 ECM OFeRMCN AND T4101ME EOUFl'MENT EIWBE ENSURED MMIpEN04 BUILDING'D'151 FLOOR J _ --_- IRVINE,CA 92618 _--- I I TBALCE88RM0 LEJ BW:PC_ � I (E) ONE SEQUOIA GAB 1 ReEYTANJW4'-RIMREq !'. L e-. 4 B`rlm.l•)\t\n F.\IVC L _ —J _ _ L _ MJ LIALIJ-OJNDATIONN 22471 ASPAN ST STE.290 INIITEMNSTALL CHAFNLINHFEHCE-112 LON R1J:PTRTJTOB- - i - BOROEOF PVE LAKE FOREST CA926'A Y/J GATE.INSTALLED TO ME PERIMETER OF THE JZT ,A.=J1 TEIi AREA.TO RE RENOVEO YMEN i I PERMANENT SRFCOMES ON LINE 1 1 �I111 IEIBOLLAROBANDCONCPID 1 I - roRIEIAIANWJLE.V/ATER T m III Mobile VUVEE E MHER PPE YIDRIu II NRTFMPI 12'CABLE THAT wI: (NI rau FlC wrEDwuLDw -----/ i 2008 MLGRAW AVENUE ITO BE PROTECTEO D.WM. )EMP VERILON NYBRO CABLE )RENON COMYNNO CONDAV cIXiBTRULTIONI 1 - FEW MOBILE NYBAM CABLE RETYING FOR ALL CMRFRE. ____ IRVINE.CRA 92614 ____ WI DErNLS PER CO AMpI PWIV.In f CABLE FRAY TO BE REMOVED VMEN SET PREPARED FOR SIN Nr PERMANENT SFTE COW ON-LINE E)FREMAh0NGC1MJwA1L COPE OEVELOPWNT SERVICE. " 0 0 6O�'1I"I __— —__ _,� �__ II I• TOSEDEMOLISHED _ _ W W IN 9.1 "'.-111 •• __ _ "A-___❑ I� IEITWWBeORMER IF 24110 MOULTON PARKWAY h III SECTION A-A ESTIMATED TRENCH CONFIG NTS Z 1 LAGUNA HILLS.CA SM7a \ I �� __ 0- -�I I I �UO,E Technology#kAssociates __– -1�Gx+�ll vtw ExarlMBTu jA �I ®swrtCMCFaR ELELTbfx SAN DIEGO MARKET OFFICE II�f� III I• E ROOM 5M MISSION CENTER RD.STE 220 It I SAN DIEGO,CA 971M ePRM•/LHT � �� III TEMPOM F \ _ ITLONLE E.TNO POLE LPARATE rIII TAP®EMTOHCR!U R: PERSEPIRITE II1NIII1 NQ SLARET R P-AN -� I,I I —. R6TALL .. L'PSTF IFGMF .4. . F.w] wGLNmF m _ NI VERILON II T MOBILE N IOA,W LN'TTN SR F- ,ISI IPERNe ROJECT _ JATE JE%iInTVIN RY AREA e IfI TO'BE' (E,GUNROL IEICMU WAII BCLURp6NID - 1 I JEMOLLS'1E0 MINIMI CdIL PAD GOR(EFMAMG'JLE. I 1.L 1-66r:1EMTUS'IED ER nrt \ O W w1TERVF1vESEmHERNPE TOB-JcMOL6YEO ��GG�oN O Jg WORKS ITO BE PROTECTED _ : OURNGCONSTRIfiY]NI -- _ _ i , S �O�G &�5��,\ F SCP r RRH ssu ui AW XLOCAT"OF AERN IF I I I IA wNI F I VVA6TAIMLE ..ucrull r��••. I I ' MONCIIOCAL YPNS TREE P' 1 ZJ � ' �IIII �llj �• I VERIZON WIRELESS Ii'ii • NEWPORT RIDGE IEIAMBIENr _ T-MOBILE - -— -_-----V E�EMO4.ITrD ------ ---- - -----------==-======_'- ----___-----_ _ P 2016-061 Attachment No. C 8 - Project Plns MW IE)6M11WMOR(EJM D E OccSEI'w' -p CONC PAD FORIEIMANHOLE, / �! verizo YII.TEIL VALVE560TMER RInE - I .OAKS IEIEEACHCONWITB VAPqus 1BUILDI SAND'CAsl ON FLOG AVE 0XATIO Dr4ENB FLEW BUIL VINE, A9 FLOOR LaaTnNE TO'BE i@LD IRVINE,CA 92618 __- VEPoFIED) - "1 IELOWATERIINE(EIUC]r-•■-- ILr-- JEUFU NTOBEFIELOVERFIED) �< I _ (E),1DCONOOR LIEF SEQUOIA OGTgNTOBE FIELDDVERIFIED) - A O]Wenitwl f]LnOi IwC I — DE TamONC WO¢EOFRG4 TO O BE ME 1EEU FLouraN 22471 FOREASPAST,CA E.92290 6CC888 TORE FIELD V ERtF1E01 LAKE FOREST,CA 92M IM TMO■A!POVMP M!#wTlo FRaLF EYT!lLTNY OOMMO■I T MobileIN W,YERI:OM:,TAMBL,F IEfffffm � ■omme.fl� .IMLLOWTImf'N.KOMOmwALLTD IFlwIUMM.I FRORc,AIIFA / P9■MLlO■TM■ItlIMILP�G01■OUO 2008 McGRAW AVENUE IRVINE,CA 92614 I - 1fyy ; fN]IVFNNI V/W XYPIRI)1:4111F • y ,'ll , NOV,IRG rp•ENVnvFRN 51•e.5 � ----- -- --- — IK)FREFSTHC•C� �y ■_'-'= --- I: 24310 MOULTON PARKWAY IAGUNA CNIIIIL L "��-^�•'+�^'u -� iu - F=F� —_F—P—P—F � `. .— ^ - 3.ElCAA SI 9283Ta306 `ww90i lOCAT10FFOFlF1 w w w /1 N -� !l E E—EE— ICx1TY CRO.MD ORCRO J/ BE gELD VEPoF4D) / - TechnologAWAssociates RlNOM 1lITRON[Rlf! (M TRAiiM:MTED WAlLOfY - lLH:TPoI'AL MODY TRENCHCORALL COMDYfe L� SAN DIEGO MARKET OFFICE STE RCYLNGFPI ALL CIIN®A � � ' 5333 MISSION CENTER 210 STE 220 �. SAN DIEGO.CA 92108 (81vO ODME mY2waNamL rMNBFOBMgDMEEM UNDERGROUND UTILITY PLAN (PERMANENT) ®' le" ,'„':',,rl ] ir.yn•e TAIF 9iTE 11MR ML e000tl TOf1■LETMY / •'QvlR¢ONLWEMIJL 1 owaaole mxzv:mowart ql L TOlE gEEOY[DAFew 9 9x9E9�e 1[•xxLN9OSW1mM w TBi N]El MVEpIM■10Vp / RC DATE DEBCPoIRpN BY I IN.VERM V1.9"MqN Cl iFRCE IOR GEWRATOR a ECM WLL �p�-\o���JG��pt� W INI IPERNI VIW W GENER4TOR ` 1 Lf ASE MEA �p G6x pl INI IlPMI YIW CpOUT iOR n J SBELTE L-7n TOQI C� FBI IREIOII OOGNOUSE a END OF TRENCH Iali INUKMf CONCRETF C49Sp1 �• FORVMU TWOBILEI2MPOLE. r wun� —F P— IEMCT WO AT"OF FOOTING Q — TORE VERI....R Of MOLrtgM OF."N' > 3 mTMONLl 1fEMw I V1RpL&ONG F`1 e TRAMfORMER VERIZON WIRELESS NEWPORT RIDGE WIT-MOBILE LAI 3164D K z 43 I W IW 20662 NEWPORT COAST DR.TMO&LE fl9f NEWPORT BEACH,CA92667 cMEwE�RELouTED �1 xwFa MONOCVCA4.YF'TVO F IW�\ LFA9E MEA 9 I I INI IRERYI T YDBILE `I'T f T T I I— HiRANE WIMGI]L PERMANENT /�` DVLF}EP9 PI MOGR81❑ O Iul / I IMIREWITMDWLE EQUIP PLAN E'HIGM CMIMILMI FENCE 2 i PO■MAO■TAbEOF W�I I TRIaRILE EID]<1m ? SHEET NUMBER 1 _ caRE.T RELDUTED W T FPOM RPEVMU9 T CO T MWpF L FML ARFA / LEASE MEA .�. fr.,•i 2EWa•I A- . EQUIPMENT PLAN (PERMANENT) o :®' ,],�.,. 2 PA2016-061 hm n No. PC 8 - ProJect PI ns T RE SVSJECTT T -NAS?re V YV > VIIG verizoAND CANYONn� TEMPoaA 1 BUILDING IRVINE,CA 2618 22471 OYILWY,NI sono•.INc ASPAN ST.STE.290 LAK IEICY.,wAu. LAKE FOREST,CA97.830 eaLwRas.ra cart PEp f[>T IE r B�Or 1EK _IEI BEC ROCM� T • •Mobile PI.E WawLe ® ■ ■ • / ruoPoskD sruw•eAnr ---2008 CA AVENUE--- ID.ID•ExvaRAur POLE IRVINE,INE,CA-- " -OCR-ION rPFR$EPAR4TE P.ANI E)CCNI VI _)BUILDING- 113 L J ti u 11, T, 1'S _r e.nJfK:. ALLY LEs+acN+OaEONAZA1ED: e . I4 Jfj vzwr TACKTaM MAI AO Al IE)s'wuaW TtENCN I I 1`NOU+YJN 1�. �E�rEr E� ECOKr WTO W RELOCATED vZO nMraLE II I I Asp. '-� �• I 24110 MOULTON PARKWAY _ �OWENR IHTHD LII 1 i 1 LQ g111TFn WNp • v�ILaO4QER Prt I —' I I LAGUNA HILLSCA, 9263Ta303 ' ADBQIrQI Y •. I I XI PERPWENT I • _ _ ______________._._�. 1 ANTBHe u'. 1 I J e Technology Associates SAN DIEGO MARKET OFFICE C 5311 MISSION CENTER STE zzo SAN DIEGO.CA 9210210 3 aM NY"Lf.4 IE1..1MENT 6IELTER. IEIaRO CONC LEa DJCT IBY OTIEN GRNIER) BANNIEYAOT LOGTION IEIIREMPAI � - TOES fBLD VERFB01 PBRN[Tp CW WML )E)V S, TER — ) f'Yn•e Tnly sin ua.TE HL mwgo�e wxzrw rvquaW as ANTENNA SITE PLAN (VERIZON) ®' BE',';;� 0 osTm�e +mxzoxKID w•umN sw REV GTE DEwNNroN ar OOrzw ALNM SECTOR AMRMNa m 1lEIYAAIrIM 6CTOILf4' sIFNIEsaORa ITYP zI •M�•PTmW p��y ILO IT It xEwvzwaLTRCE N■N�• �xAKPTmucTall•r ' '\w' p���G��(]JG�\p� xaWPREa MT _,,�W� SECTO aLRH I,p�'�O �'(C� i RaYC4P UNIT E!P•'- KJIIp ALPHA Mb YF \_"`_ N A BACK IEIv(W le'ITN1 p sUrPREasOR11TYr EI / AMrEMMILTmK n G J � � 709E RElOGTED p� g NEwvrn swLaE � swPREssM V YONOFUC TgEE� CUa OY CEY4M VN°"� \M u�wnt •A•E(TOE IEIeMOLE snot � r .r r,r,,.In RLx:r�'rw�r r TONER 9 (EI GTwAUt NAINL: ,/ v\ ,v, \ IEI vzw N'ITULAx.F»AL Iq aR,LTEac VERWIRELESS _, J-A7rE}1D• RR vzwITFgNLE YOLNrEooN wnLL-TD REnw NEWPORT RIDGE t MEW VLW ALYMII YCTON RRVr AI IDFUC 01 IITOTRL) K Md1NTFDSEMMD NEW YITIIEM DMPLNE•15'os yN NaSfiT4rN•JN(• (E, YLwH'1 ruL DLsr1\' T-MOBILE Ix TOTALI INJOONALPNANCOCIR 'EiYTNLAI 3164D D ® WM 111) 0-1 TALL IEIYLwY +A. 11I.' SLIKI eCTDR 4MWPTDTLLI MDLWT y2W HlTALLAMTENN/. IM10 )ON WALL.TOREMAW TORkMAKOTOTALI 101161 6 R nrDTAL) / tDONeY'L�TO� 20662 NEWPORT COAST DR. NMw vLw sE ASECTORfG IETOTILLI relcN=EsrRNaNc — RTENNAsaroTALI NEw vzwaLv,w aecTOR RRu• NEWPORT BEACH,CA 2667 _ =.rr..e.e+cnw...... •,.e,.�......�,.« MONOCVCKYF'TVO N NEW VLW BETA eECTOR RRL. IL TOTAL)x YgM•FD SENIM NEW YITENW. d _ � QTO'AII SHEET TITLE vZW ANTENNA PLAN SHEET(EIfNTENN4 NUM O IOTHEi Gg41ER1 fi e'f Ys (: �'!' 16' BOIILIL: ,n•'•\'•P IRNaNI 0 4'6' TS' BCALA: 1HP•1'-0"114+NI p�• is• KALIL: \n•'�N'P WxAN ANTENNA PLAN (PERM) ® DA ,,,�_,.� ,,,,, Q ANTENNA PLAN (TEMP) ® D, ,P, ,,.� ,,f,, 3 ANTENNA PLAN (E) PA2016-061 h . PC 8 - Project PI ns r _ verizonl 15605 SAND CANYON AVE. L ---BUIL ING '1FLOOR II IRVINE,VINE, 9 CA 92618 LL -1 SEQUOIA 'ERMWENf 22471 ASPAN ST.STE.290 e �annoLrtK.e, —_— LAKE FOREST,CA9Y830 T • •Mobile • IEICW wALL 2008 McGRAW AVENUE Ba Arosun ca cP.KDEo-E,E) - IRVINE,CA -- WI.10lE.WATfx 'IEI•LEC ROC•,- 92614 ------��—�------ vKVEs40pffR I ® • voF L,oR118 17,17 T ED SPRN'a L16i 10.10 TkYPOMRY POLE •J :OCA*Ip,rvEn SEPRRF*E PLAHI - J LE BTAOILTOM CEYOLDRED: ALLY ��� `101 DDNIRDI PLL l/WMO W RFLOCA 113 I BItiDtM3� a EpUiYfM iO BE RELCGATED B -ICI BJF]N(:- L_I 24110 MOULTON PARKWAY 1 a111TF n WNYI ` AREA -1EI SJL3M LACUNA HILLS,CA 92937,10416 VEISI MTRENCHW�I , _ NIP ER ROUNFNO V J"eYOtrtK]N- I I REA Technology##Associates •'E vAa(NYci aR I I JJAILRKIN I I I 1 AICA •Y• / , SAN SIGN ENTMARER D.STE _ I 5313 MISSION CENTER RD.FIC 220 SAN DIEGO,OA 97108 INILJ 1 I��ICIcwwUr.•�0.T4 `IEI$OCRlC 1YG JILT -- ~--�_ J STF YWSF gn ,_,vrw e.ore 1 IBV OTIERCWRERI I TOSE lNCTLOGTKIN IEIC9EESTANJNG IrvoupaR qT.J TOB•iELD VERFEDI PERMETEx qK1 Y/NL . ... OK'.W 9IYLTTM Rl D.TE JE.C41�TK)N BY ANTENNA SITE PLAN (T-MOBILE) 10 ' ""` '"4 "`�'•'B' lop ,nF•.,•4rP1•nl may , d1EITAtlBEE IwrEFa✓,1.1 \\_ YEw rJgBILE TYAy RECTpT IOBE �O\ O W YONFfED BEMMDu1FFwY6 N 1 IEPFA ECiDRIB rpIK ICY/TyDMLE 1YAY MgIMlDBflIBOAMflNIIIB EEITYYlB4F,RCRDwAVE V!' IEITMOBl5 MCt(XIA a NPER KDTpE1B TOTK AMDNATO BE REIIXI,TEJ �a iELOCI•TEJ°i01A TeTI>>OLE �O —(E)TMONLE NCRMiAVE IEITMOBI'e TMA ZI a - S O• w n RELO(•,ATEDctpY BMgLE STACrc pA. OOO6OO..... O o sELT04 To BC x30LAi_= g �vTC� C` //'L//\ pOp .fOtl•�C • fS f r VERIZON WIRELESS NEWPORT RIDGE T-MOBILE LAI 3164D x „EW TMDNLE Y f wLL.YI YDINr 20662 NEWPORT COAST DR. NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92667 TYDBILF MONOCUCALYPTUO b..�.... . NEW d:y 7 o•. ANr£NNA1 O"AEIR TOTAL I)PFR a y E SF/.Cv ii / a sfcTORIAO SNCCT nn[ Ip ,EICI.TY KRA&M T-MOBILE W� NEW rnOBILE t ,m Vxw,..IDBILE • EIOWITND ANTENNA PLAN O ANIEYFNHII PER • n 9fCTOR1a TOT4 DMPLNE=`1TO 1 p< 2 O BGLLB: 1nr•,'•D•IB4aM1 0 4' R' TB' WC : tnr-I'a U4s41 4•�' 1Q' BCALB: tn4-.1'l WWI A g ANTENNA PLAN (PERM) °® ,,�-,.� ,,,,, 4 ANTENNA PLAN (TEMP) — „„ ,,, -,., ,,A,, 3 ANTENNA PLAN (E) P '\2016-061 Attachment N . PQ 8 - Project PI ns verizon" 15505 SAND CANYON AVE. A TOPOF E%18TWIVIO(E TONER 4'ELEv.EIDE'?qG BUILDING'D'1st FLOOR IRVINE,CA 92618 (E7rYOB6.E PNfEHl4K TORE REMOVED(])E.LH (I)PER S'cCTOR (EI TMCBIRONpVE ANFcMiTO BE A TO BE REILCRTED PADCEME EI08TNGTJApBIIEgMEffY9 _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ r� 1� . lF)ANTENWS.IBV OTHERCPRW_�� 1A AGI. I}' y1p- - TplgmnMl Ttmc..Ivt 12471 ASPAN ST.STE.290 t� Lv I LAKE FOREST.CA916Y1 I TWW(TEXDBEM T m ,Mobile • f]170T4 q7 BLC10M Y.• TOff RELOCATED VJ AVENUE RgDCENTERCF EMBTMO VEw_gNrpYs _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - 2008 ELEv wawa IRVINE,NE,CA 928144 IEgNTENLxS.RY Or4ERG3i1E3) I • IEI VLVINITENNgS TO R£WMIl EECII (IOgNT�.�. IEYOIIER CASTER) � IEIGlVIµ1tRKNG IEI WW YITENWS TO BE 4E'IACEDI1PADA • ' IEISEIbLE RTI.OL Tb/IEY E IEIVE EOJIoxIEM BIIELTER IEI'1-IGI LOG vlgLL IEI'2 YIG IBLOCN n4L (EIEOJIeMEMYeLT-R 'E'TYC8RE EOJPVAheT— 24310 MOULTON PARKWAY v T o inm=a. I�leu.mo T,)BE-E,'X'tT RIIITF IY WNNI LAGUNA HILLS,GA 92837-3306 l A NCE ExleiNc v_tw_zMETlfE9 _ jn0.l u . .0..0 n TechnologyOWAssociates SAN DIEGO MARKET OFFICE 5333 MISSION CENTER RD.STE 220 SAN DIEGO.CA 92108 SOUTHWEST ELEVATION (EXISTING) 6 r®' mm,„w._,E• 01.1r) 1 TEL".. to wxzMl rvDlzewlT aT v:ro lmxzoxxD 6uumW w NEn ryERYITYC9ILF 1ME WIgS 11 YFR 9ECTOR)ilOT4M - MEn IPEbp iYOBILE 41TEMIgS 11 PER SECTd11]IOTgLY 4.1 •DATE DESCRIPTION BY i W'9 MOUNTED Bf MMD 4Itl NYE(IPPR llCTO16ETOfK T W'3 Yg1NTED BEMMD.NIEMY!Il PfR lECip(16 TOT4 IEI TAIO61LE YICROVMVE gNTBNILTOBE RELOCATED _` •RGI lE1V PRE - E:TAIl AMETl)1=lZ_L:.iEJ a G s F �O _ VE �MCWWLREYC lLEAS 0 p MaMorOLEOr•DafD � q5 RLD"HTAS4'AQL ROF ELE V - OWN TYDBILEANTENMS D 51 ,' �p YOSELE ANTENNAD AS 61 �O ELEV.61'4'"Lj, ELEV.61'D'AGL RM CENTEIIG MIOPOSEO I"� f R WAFOTER Oi MCPo3E0 �J,v I,LJI 1'x j vLW RMTfMY6 _ _ n FLF N. NNAB "TUI III1lIC�llll $� ELev.wa•IiOL ELfv.wo->cLAL Y MIW IllM0 Y1W xTY0&L! -- I w Q MGIClDC,LLYINSIRFE ,� NEW REEi1 VOR 4PW EECLpIS4 fNTEN1Y8M5L.RFE i k i ANTENNA Imo]TOTAL) UNrNgro TRV'.Yourt[O BErta IIO vm MTT4LDu6rr IEIYzn R'IT4L DOB"" VERIZON WIRELESS .Y1lNWRIOTED OR*ALI. - RNIENW Y«,N*ED ONMELL. NEWPORT RIDGE n TOREIMNII RITILL F xEWOPERNI VLWALPWSECTDNSPgNTENNPSvISDRGE TO REWMII TOTAL.) V pp j h SL FESSOR WYCgR VNiIO.NO MV1 MOlIN'EB BEXINB I - Ew ITJY1BILETEYRORARTPOLE FNTFMNFIITOT4j C< III YLn N'IT4L4REIE1. IEj YZw RT TLLL 4rtENM T-MOBILE YOLINTlD ONYYLLL.TO RlIMN YOOM YMLL,TO RfWIN R TOTW Yh-; (I TOTAL) LAI 3164D IEIgNTENM3. IE)AMOlYB, IBP OPK_a GRWER) IEIVEW (EIFD.Iw61ENT BIEVER IBP OT•RCYiR6Ri�, E,vZo E�Eudl=M=NrSI=LT=_+ z.11c4 EQLEPMPTISBTER (BVDT-IER1e11.z-1 IE)IZNnN ,\ =1111-11 CLrER 110TI=RL11p NEWPORT0662 NEWPORT ,CA926COAST R. BmGvlfu BLo1aLwAu — NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92667 A , ` - _ MONOCUCKYF'TVO �RAD CENTER G PROPOSED RILDCENTERGF%iWMED Y7W rwTENus 'S"Yzw qR, NWAS SHCCT TITLC ELf V.l00'POL 1 CCPV.IXAGI , L 0 a Li c ELEVATIONS -11, GRgOE A.GEBBN DRq EI ELEV.Od REF �ELEV.D�D REG ? EYW V2W BETq SECTpL(Y HELY VM BE'L SECTpI ft Q gNIB1IM4 RTOT41 FNTEx1Y511 TO'nLl .. T NEMYIW BETq SEDTRI RTD.YOIjMTED NEW YIw BF•.SEC•OR RO® �- BEMro Nn4E1ENNq R rOTLL) DEIexD RE. TOTAL) FN'ENIu R TOTAL) 2 SOUTHWEST ELEVATION (FINAL) SOUTHWEST ELEVATION (TEMPORARY) V� QP �P Attachment No. PC 9 Correspondence from Newport Coast and Ridge Representatives 43S V� QP �P �4 31f September 12, 2016 John Arnau, Manager, Environmental Services, CEQA/Habitat Support OC Waste & Recycling Chris Matthews Project Manager OC Waste & Recycling James Campbell Principal Planner City of Newport Beach Gentlemen, We would like to thank you again for arranging the recent meeting at the project site. Dan and Gerry found it to be both highly informative and enlightening. Perhaps the most important piece of information we learned was the need to have an unobstructed microwave signal between the project site and Signal Peak in order to provide network communication, a little-known fact that had not been stated during any of the previous discussions or in the documents.This would explain the justification for having at least one antenna at a certain height in order to establish the link.We had always assumed that a hardwired underground connection existed between the project site and the network. We also learned that placing antennas around the project site's perimeter wall and adjusting their degree of tilt in order to fine-tune and achieve the widest amount of coverage would still be a compromise design compared to installing conventional towers with circular antenna arrays, especially if these wall-mounted antennas might hinder the implementation of future technology. Finally, if several clusters of wall-mounted antennas were to be placed 20'or up to 50' above the wall,their appearance could likely result in an even worse aesthetic appearance. That said, and given the carriers' attempt a few years ago to install a new monolithic cell tower structure along Newport Coast Drive in order to improve acknowledged coverage deficiencies for each network in the area, we were shocked to learn that none of the carriers had made any attempt during this planning process to reevaluate the quality of service at this site and to improve and to optimize it during the relocation.The AT&T engineer never mentioned when its next generation technology,5G,would be implemented here, and at the same time,we learned that Verizon's equipment here is already one generation behind its current technology and nothing was said about bringing it current or preparing it for the carrier's next generation technology, LTEAdvanced. -4S5 While we are interested in reviewing the next set of requested simulations that will depict current and future coverage once the permanent towers are in operation, we are very skeptical about the information that has been provided and that which will be forthcoming.The reason for this is simple— just take a look at the nationally published maps from both AT&T and Verizon,which ignore the varied terrain,the elevation changes and the roadway patterns, and completely misrepresent the level of service here in Newport Coast. In fact, based on these maps, one would assume that 100% coverage is available everywhere in Newport Beach, which it clearly is not. AT&T AT&T Maps _ Wneiese Caverage Type Dorms Wireless Date Coverage e em. usvn• Oonpsb c D° vv. pw V.Covnape W(I Type Igss. 4GLM' .c K zc bmmawrel ora parwni o,m ® v--on eate ,C ISE• eate la P"ACITE eate .C• Lvnrm.aOOJ kqM man aePM+c . X. a�mpa P.pw x• L<Py F Verizon Check your coverage me auna Cm a3= See WIWI Wornoton about covetape 92657 In to.area or seatlnng t65 map 4 LTE Data coverage Data Covetage • voce a Mes ting Repad P"to Tak ans VOL 0 Ganwaua:eWparpCta -�3(0 During our community outreach for this project,the two most commonly expressed views were as follows: • Remove the existing exhaust stack and don't replace it with another tower (or towers). • Improve cellular reception along Newport Coast Drive and along the#73 toll road. Since there is a near-universal aversion to cell towers among the residents here,the only way the community would support this project would be some form of compensating factor, like an improvement in cellular service. However,the carriers have no plans to improve service or install the newest technology available during the relocation.We are also concerned that once the carriers have spent considerable funds for both the temporary and permanent towers, it will be a very long time before they commit additional funds for future improvements here. We believe that if the carriers want to install the towers then they must commit to the community and to their many customers here by correcting the existing deficiencies, upgrading their equipment to current standards by the time the permanent towers are installed, and by installing 5G and LTE Advanced technologies as soon as they become available.This is the only way the community will accept the aesthetic compromise of having two large faux tree towers installed in plain view. Regarding the appearance of the faux tree towers,we would like the selected "species"to be the one that offers the thickest foliage, which at this time appears to be Eucalyptus. Based on the simulations provided, Eucalyptus will provide the highest level of screening and be most compatible with the site's existing trees and the new natural ones that will be installed during the landscape restoration. Concerning the size the new natural trees to be installed, we would like them to be as large as possible at installation so that they will blend in quickly, provide adequate screening to the property's perimeter walls, screen the towers as depicted in the simulations (or better), and not require a time frame of 20 years for this to be achieved. In closing,we want the carriers to commit to providing the much needed and long-overdue service and equipment upgrades, to the highest level of current technology, and that this commitment is made a condition of approval for this project. For OC Waste & Recycling, we request that the most effective faux tree design be selected and the largest natural trees installed. We feel that the technology request, in particular, is reasonable and one that the community here deserves, and is the only one it will support. Sincerely, Jim McGee President, Pelican Hill Community Association President, Newport Coast Community Association Phone: (949) 640-0500 jimmcgeeC@mcgee-law.com Dan Wampole President, Newport Ridge Community Association Resident,The Summit HOA Phone: (949) 466-8591 wampole@me.com Gerry Ross Vice President, Pelican Hill Community Association Phone: (949) 285-6630 gerrvross@gmail.com '4'37 V� QP �P �3g Attachment No. PC 10 Faux Eucalyptus Tree Installation at 2401 Irvine Avenue 439 V� QP �P ��o Faux Eucalyptus Tree Example 2401 Irvine Avenue 40J tow Mae' ry \` Y V� QP �P Attachment No. PC 11 Photographic Example of Faux Eucalyptus Materials Board 44S V� QP �P 444 �� ` i �� ' . r �� �� i �w ��} •. r�4 e r 1• 11,.' 1 3 u r _ ., _ �} - `�v '��t �.. �� r /. Lwr'wYRMU __ `� garvor � mar�aomu bN.wgwnM��r W ar�m�vawpv��nin,mv�� A sny-M...a.b�e ..�oa,�..r o.,,y�w�a.ud 4 � w�v Nwt �a aevF eee�v yrr Sr.�aa`rn �.,.� ,.�,.r'i`m,.w�u.m°�w F'.... ' ymr+.�ww.,^..,,.sawx.+.m r.wew e.�a....�.�,.+ .. r+�w.°a.=.,am�.a...w r.e��.�rx.n �eM....,...,,a�ea....r.w.a, or' �.. ..�,.... w.a.w«n�,.n,,,y�o.y..a... �' ____ .'tom—_— aw�.��m..�e 4.gym.r,m so...: roa.r�...r tea...�.ab��+�,n e.�..w...�... - - acinr.�+�iarmro«w nwu�w,a w+.row N..m�a , warty.oam,ua•w.o w w•a.r+r..n ra.µa m ��w..rs�ai.raw."�.._......wm 1 r`^;i _ i r: ,�•.l�.Yrw➢aw�+"...`K.ww. . r'�J�1PB_r,..,.,u n., � Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Item No. 2a Additional Materials Received vvroR Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update (PA2016-091) vu+cv41 BEACH FIREL. DE NEWPORT L' DEPARTMENT CL� 100 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-3267 a'^ • PHONE: (949) 644-3104 WEE: www.nbfd.net FIRE SCOTT L.POSTER Fire Chief September 20, 2016 Mr. Kory Kramer, Chair Newport Beach Planning Commission Dear Mr. Kramer: I have been advised that the current cellular site atop Newport Ridge may be removed in the near future. Although it is not in the purview of the fire department to be involved in any part of the placement of a cellular site, it is in the best interest of emergency responders to have cellular coverage. Currently, there is poor or no cellular coverage on Newport Coast Drive near the Sage Hill High School. In the event the cellular coverage is reduced on Newport Ridge, it may affect emergency communications in the upper Newport Coast area. It is the position of the fire department to support cellular coverage of the upper Newport Coast area to enhance cellular communication for emergency responders. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincere , Scott L. Poster Fire Chief SLP:cg Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 6W PO Item No. 2b Additional Materials Received o�P R e Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition relffl(Teledit Update (PA2016-091) �n OMMUNITY DEVELOPI� _ f n 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach,California 92660 Gq `p. 949 644-3200<UFolk newportheachca.gov/communitydevelopment Memorandum To: Planning Commission PA2016-091 File From: Benjamin M. Zdeba, AICP, Associate Plann� Date: September 21, 2016 Re: Coyote Canyon Landfill-Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update (PA2016-091) — Updated Coverage Maps and Exhibits from Carriers The attached updated coverage maps and related exhibits were prepared in response to a meeting held on August 24, 2016, with the County, the applicants, and representatives of the Newport Coast and Newport Ridge neighborhoods concerning improvements to the existing coverage as a result of the proposed project; however, they were not attached to the staff report. Community Development Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Item No. 2b Additional Materials Received a l$ct Coyote Canyon Gas lea iy Facility Denffifilion and Telecom Urpdtfle"RAT016-091) Manager,Real Estate 1452 Edinger Ave ds2743@att.com Administration Third Floor www.att.com AT&T Mobility-Los Angeles Tustin,CA 92780 August 31, 2016 Maree Hoeger CORE Development Services REF: Cell Site Number: LAR054 Cell Site Name: Newport Coast Cell Site Address: 20662 Newport Coast Dr. Newport Beach, CA Fixed Asset Number: 10087027 Dear Maree, I am following up with an email per the request of the City and HOA representing the residences of Newport Beach, for our PERM relocation at the above site. Our existing service will not change (improve) if we maintain the same RAD center height and continue to use the same equipment that we currently have on the smoke stack. Irrespective of the structure we are mounted on, our service will be the same. The initial request made by our landlord was to remove and relocate the existing equipment to a structure provided by others. If our height is reduced our service will be negatively impacted. If you have any questions in the future, please feel free to address your concerns to me. Thanks very much, Regards, Donna Rose Sprint j Sprint Orange County Proposed Site OG25XC211 ©2013 Sprint.This information is subject to Sprint policies regarding use and is the property of Sprint and/or its relevant affiliates and may contain restricted confidential or privileged materials intended for the sole use of the intended recipient.Any review,use,distribution or disclosure is prohibited without authorization. Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Existing Voi;R /� _ V6r;W �, �ek� aterials Received ��Q��(� i Ib ate (PA2016-091) Weak Areas along Newport Coast Drive, 73 Toll Rd ❑ No Coverage 0 Marginal Q o. SJ 0 Average Good �' Lrll loxn Xo.n �r 1 S L _ )C j Lrody Cuny Gd(Club _o `e J Mq Qy� 4�n,W GanY�'Or oraO ' ri Pal ew "Moog oa Itw v�i� Hig'rECrydn.Couritiy� aY �FMie FAQ a - b vadwrrlmnd Club W!)O1ONIN MILS ✓ ay • �OG36XL� c. r /Par$ar San Joaquin Hills S 1 •I y S 4Mampnol �D a'Pv par} SPrGtnfs ln.l ln Hills Rd ;Inloaqu,n H,111 Rd oW 1 r Newport Coast w a, C� O j B Id" m tvqum Cumt Wde"i `4Q a .f+ c.Palss nl p" t >.nw wusl F - Corona del Mar _ b r Cryool Core Sro Park Rmwa°I M..Hdl V binq 2 201 IUVIEqL MO in 2016 MbMOR C°rpoeeMn F Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Predicted Voice Cd�,,ltR# e' F1E 1QQl2$ 2d -11 ditiop�l a i�e6-i 9 j a i T leco 16 091 Improves part of Newport Coast Drive ❑ No Coverage W - ❑ Marginal I, o. 1„R ❑ Average ® Goon ,1 eb t I� _ vadY Canyon ca,I crW °w 9,C— C.—r,Cl.b y club y • •OG25%[211_Wa11 sr.r,�ancur.ni_i_ v� p, anlwqumH, Z SII:Pd r N port Coral V O, Z� Q B m myurw Cuan WAE.:.-- G RC p14 Corona del Mar ,b `u C".1 Com State Gark Loss of Residential Coverage Vbmt, r,=arare"D 3016M—ftcc�..., �Pllanning C/o�mmmissiio°n - Senal ptember 22, 2016 ived Predicted Voic�,POMQr, �teF%q M, it�b i i1�YP§I�dm77pddt� 016 091) Increased Coverage on Newport Coast Drive ❑ No Cot,erage ❑ Marginal ❑ Average 13 ` ® Good - SfiJpCanym Gull Cl_-b 4 L Q u 11.119 O� ch �9 y P Club c OG25XC311-Euc '— an Joaquin M,_s 'sRd b tnr 3oaaus r3n',.ar. .J`,. F " 5' N,- port Coast - c °^b,, .fk � o, o 0 -'o,. n 6 c toqum coos wne.,,r . 03 6 Corona del Mar ua Plan to Relocate Sector Covering Improves Residential Coverage 73 Toll Rd onto Tree �'+ yira Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Existing LTgt�Cageev rFromDQ S '2i4"JMaterials Received pdate (PA2016-091) C` llnivry„t,nl:Wi,on,u LJ No Coverage fwsrelmF .' - rim. 6 F'o . T�as� ❑ w, ”, a Marginal a 3 m d�. 1' s.j1 E-1 Average a. •Po`� 7 Yn o;a C,�nao^Dr Good IHIF rORp ROA(! �6 � 4f �a of _. � ,� snoar co�w�cagclRn d Uq e°r 5. BOnire Canyon Ony; S � H BIA GNYON- � _ iu v4'Ri &'g Ccoyon Country Club .�:Il I11GL1 no aVln C 9y w 9 a'Or J 1R C r1,F Fashion island aT•acP �i''G aec 6 0 0 y aacasaczn ueloepwn wus 71� Ref�f - San Joaquin Hills i 5 vm. Mona a'Rv Pof4 '"lcu>. ,n Hills Rd �- 0 Sun 1payun Hills RE � CI C Newpurl Coast "Kb p,%6 tZe '6G/nO C T �tl" B m c zey�.,ac.w,ra.,� - o c �° ,� Q 9 [ uCIfI.N�UfI G P' Rd S C� - msraaA4R �9` M Corona del Mari rfwoca Asr e� ny h OR �_ o i Provides In-building coverage at Shopping Mall & Residential Areas ... Ccigo�ee �+ Planning Commission p- September 22, 2016 r Received Predicted LTE CCWQQga farQWer�llelli�& d9ilfd4� , l e'e�cjGrMf tt 2016-091) ry yanm.. ...... Ll No Coverage uremn � d awn 1.. F Fid ❑ Marginal1a Marginal 7 3 `r. •4 �',�3. O` 5.5?R ® Average GnYon ON Good ons r^RO Roau � eoo e ; �, Fo,dk :�, n snoar canra�Ga4crun Q+ry Ban,ra Canyon of nor S B�6 UNYCI. _ d'J 1�9PB'JR V:I VI C., 111 Gp6 is,canyon Country mb °T 'uE alcp! ^a'94 O �ryry � i g a ]3 C rb t EasMon iJaM YT•acP �H� _ 0 y Ce 'OG25%C211_Wall nN ronpulN NIL" 7Eo Rar fir San Waquin Hills i j Yrtw D �qo qak� srrcusnia .. 0 n Joaquin Hills Pd o a C Newport Coast <Z� B m '40 P P _ r Rmct S QJ a vuuWfRe Corona del Mar rsxvaR-elasr b Oa i c9cTca `y c C".1 Com State Park Reduced In-building Coverage at Shopping Mall Vbing il 201R Niki b AND 2015 M—,.ft C,...n Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 itiona ri Is Received Predicted LTEt � ic�, c � tom U ( 2016-091) \ , inn n°I ,InmLLlrvin ❑ No Cot,erage IPSIBIUIF O ❑ Marginal u. 3 4 _ . sly+ ❑ Average e^` o " l, Oa'an CanyonM ■ Good ONE fOPO ROAD .n ° F°r - w 12 � SncdV(.p�lyun C.J/r Cl_b d Ff F a"i Bonus Canal�r e o_ B14 CANYON O S'J NMBOR VIFW 11 ' a ' myon C—,Oub m '� 'q A n � C h Faskon lalaM ��P �H'� P Ciub .0 o 7 SAN IWOUIN HILESSanJwoaq pm.✓ 0 a•OG35XC311 Euc G. yllin Nl�iS 7 S. V Mermrid �9° pph mvmASSNaf fill,Rd b San ba uin Mills ptl s' N F Q Y\` Nmpon Coast n'r/q.pa,kp6 P �bW^Or ai9 O' B T C`^ l.¢O (\ R ^KO _� [vGRf SSA! 4319 P VAbFlt PID41 2 O°�G .' 'yV•Ib 0.b9e Rd �`Y� •9 Corona del v Mar 'V Nranaae. As) 1i y 4y y S C9Cac: O°r e Increase in "Good" LTE Coverage at Shopping Mall 1p'DngD010 Pak 9 m 3010 N41REQ @�PNU c 2016 Mkrusdl CgponOon Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Predicted LTRo( ,yayjragp, jrQt,'32G'=jjePA201eceived 6 091) BU�n^,uryuICnWomalrvu,e � LJ No Coverage fwsrRwry �' d - e'r^n Sr Fes♦ J . i�aS� I1 � Marginal i t`o t�+R ® AVefB.C�e e Rp o - n pC dy"I'lDr.-. �oF Good oNf rono ROAD � Ba!"- 5� J � Ju e1�tt � Gp SIwdY Conym Gal/C/ub ry Rtl &°r 5. Bonin Cany�^Or B'A CANYON- � O ,r, RBOR VIfW `id n W9 Ccoyoa Coui Club m �p � xul¢Rlocf °Bk H rq 2 FA 3d 01 m M 9N PC 'RN rb r ratMon Nlantl Club R SAN JOAQUIN NIL" � •OGia•Q311 c. Rna,6< San Joaquin Hilts D 5qv Mnborloriolftbil vrminssnRa ""i Win Ra 0 tan A,quin Hill,Rd In"" CI Newport Coag R"i DR,,Rd LZO Q B i ,pC 1, mqurw Caun WAEm> .£, ,r�Rlt,n- F P VIA 1 vnRd l.RIO fie` ol. yo Colons del Mor N ufxvoR'oAs* f! 1 N nd 9Lc ftl1 iystnl Com 4rfe Fmk In-building coverage at Shopping Mall, Residential Areas ,, =,2010 NRVIFQ€AND 2016 Manson CORombon ^ Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Predicted LTE Plus Glpya p Fr,0Mabili(G. -t1f,;iti' ived a j#Ae091) No cot Reduction in Overall LTE Plus Coverage ❑ erse ,.tls >J ❑ Marginal „o syrR ❑ Average Good ME TORO FCAD ,1 4r. 12 _ ra `o. � _ .. shear ceera�cegclla oRif ears B°nire CanyDn Or BIL CANNON- _ IIRRBOR VIfW 111 Gp� p..i ,no14, W9 Carryon Country Club Oy Q niSrlE FIUGI L� rry A 0 a `� , a PC RN rn r EasMon IslandiQ 4 clubd 3 o i y 'oczsxczl t wan SAN lonculN Iota 71� per fir Sen losgwn Hills � Vrcw i. D 5qv Rlnrcriol srrclncauntvoln Mills Pd 1 0 Jzn l a4uin Hills atl o CI r' - Rewpon coast a'a]o T B C.wnar,l..- QG Y,�+R� o Clflr NSU;I vnl.RAF ae Corona del Mar vry 1j N PC 09 c Oo ti ''2 ..E Loss of "Good" Coverage at Newport Coast Dr & Vista Ridge Rd [AND 2016 Meson CONomon Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Predicted LTE PluSyO ,ragoFry Ori =j,jUp tr e6 091) Increased LTE Plus Coverage at Shopping Mall 1❑ Marginal ginal a s e , ❑ 0.9 13 0 Average n 'nyonor e` Good ONE fONO ROAD []K] rz 1 f Fohl qd BN '�.'^ SIadVCanyon Ool�Clrb F �y Bon'4 Canyu4`or °rq o N &4 CANVON S'J NMBOR VIIW ,1 as myon Coum.y Cub FA dY � n 0 � 6 C h FasHon lala4W ��P ��� Club C v 7 SAN IWOUIN HIl15 ✓ u % OG35XC311 Euc G. Van/ $an loaQmn Hills S. M m d �9v part mvmnss 1W e:Hills RA m qa f San baquin Hills Rd IP C F Newport Coast wP hyWp O. !9 � B conn wre..n:, g � r a1' 4y Corona del Mar ``yam h rHnrcc-c�As: i i �y y C9Cace E Provides "Good" Coverage at Newport Coast Dr & Vista Ridge Rd os o46 nm�,nRc vnann Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 CGQb(AFT1Rgesas��'++ m No. 2b Additional Materials Received �R PjaiGWtion and Telecom Update (PA2016 091) The Proposed 65ft Tree will: 1. Improve Voice Coverage on Newport Coast Drive at Sage Hill Drive. 2. Improve Voice Coverage in Communities along Newport Ridge Drive E. 3. Improve LTE Coverage at Shopping Mall. 4. Provide Platform for Future Small Cell Deployment. Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 • Item No. 2b Additional Materials Received Coyote CarAweFacility Demolition and Telecom Update (PA2016-091) • Pipe Mounted Option Predictions • Existing Voice Coverage Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Predicted Voice C@� �� �►, , Q� Additi I,Jyl erj� 16-i 91) s i e7eo �!/� 16 091) Improves part of Newport Coast Drive ❑ No Coverage 14 ❑ Marginal 11 ❑ Average Good L tl ro O �1I.h OG25XC211 Plq -' .. -. an Joaquin Nllls , D '••.tid ,....._ am ilh Rd m -.lo) N ort Coart , ,,, ^' 9 >abnC ROGI +_ vm;xan`xe s Co,ona del Mar Crystal Cove Store Pa& Loss of Residential Coverage 1p,1n, r=010M� 'µn rolsMK� �� Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Predicted LTE COMPO �, FX eQQlg15X=n11—Te r ett 2016.091) BGnnrvncl 1°m�w� = a ❑ No Cot,erage IwsrBluil % OO11-11 Is 4aj ° A F r 0 Marginal 3 V° z j 0 Average O' ONE Polo Polo 1 .�u�aCanyMa Good b Q ay 6 • SbadY Conor^cal Clubsl" •/ea eoiy aO24 S i ' M4 CANYON \_ O td' MBOR VIIW ad n Gc s� &9 Ccnyon Country Club uetlf RIG41 O 6 3 c m o n C In Pal Elland ��P �H'O Oub .0 c OG25%@11 Pipe 7�a SAN IWOUIN NIl15 ✓p, pR�N San JoNsin Mills e Z. Mead '9y port semlAss n"I ,.n Hills Rd ! b San JOaquln Rills Rd 4os°sQ a F - Newport Coast owid gfr4R ale �aNe `, 9 B ;.Go n e peO Al` coca wJh.nr:.. V.CMC AbFlt PIOGD41 39 2Rd 2 Oaf° 4� ory. gttnRJ9e Corona del Mar - ,� NfwGOR•C.AST 4,, x Crystal Cove Slot-Park Reduced In-building Coverage at Shopping Mall 1p bing l,2010 Qq MU 93415 Heroeolt C,,snon Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Predicted LTE PlusCCovoraga Foromili � �'MPal1 X91) Reduction in Overall LTE Plus Coverage �°�` E] No Coverage ❑ Marginal F,. o• R ❑ Average gn Goon teCaityonDr ■ ONE roan aonn � 'Ba'"- • z s Q Fo, � SIadV Cancan Ool/(Irb F Yy Benitd Cdnyo^DI .)�. _ s j ' N4 CANYON I _ S'J MBOR VIIW 1 D° 09y, &a cc"."C—„ Club R, 9 j A 3 m` �T C t h FasHon IalaM aD'pp 3H ” \ Club .0 o OG35%C]1t.Plq\ o \ SAN IWOUIN MINS P�, P� San loagwn Hills a S. �9v Meeh m�clnis uat "I".Hills RE 1 b 54,1baquin Hills Rd _0 N r' Newport Coast 9 1 ^ m tosa,a coon w,lenn,.,. CeeO (• R �O CVaaISSA_ 4°l, v ant N.n P 5 RE 11 1 vniaapge IN Corona del Mar ti � 6 e C9La1e �r^ t ncda`61 E Loss of "Good" Coverage at Newport Coast Dr & Vista Ridge Rd FMJ 2016 MI—oft CR c,sben Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Existing Voice Cal(�me sag�rfFCO1M iOW= 9tfda terials Received e e �(��date (PA2016-091) PN 186 — Sector 1 eorf4Cam ZL 45 PN 258 — Sector 2 ' BIG �5 2 Is °'`�,I,, PN 402 — Sector 3 -' tom ti n is a a v 2} tr m•� �t JIM 300 Newport Or PraS A 185 8mch Fashion Island tP'dO 186 A untry Club 300 ro MG 300 n 4@ 402 0 30D 402 4810 SAN JOAOUIN HILLS YP n Joaqu 36 View �qp• MP*rroP L59 SP HILL 402 IRVINE 3` 'fin Joaquin His R112 40 L RRACE Newp4 Pidg0 paro AA pab Po or 40 4yy F 40 402 ryGN64 a.1 g yL Y. 40 ?;LIFIC R Lr_L E� w 40 R:9. 5� Vlata R14 d y 40 0 0.81 1.62 L 2uFOR-Last jW miles a : Existing Location (Smokestack) a s Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update (PA20 man i Marginal i Fair 0 Good 0 Excellent Proposed Location Item Kin ?h Acil-IffinnA NjAtpri�ls R as Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update (PA20' _ 1 1 O?j46q 111111, - - Improved coverage within residential area from proposed location Marginal - Result In better cellular service,high data speed and further improvement in areas where coverage is patchy Fair Fr-- - Hwy 73 will have better mobility in terms of high speed traffic.Better call retention for uphill if downhill traffic on Hwy-73 Good r - Coverage along Newport Coast Dr.will be more richer at proposed location Excellent JNJE-- Mobile, Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Item No. 2b Additional Materials Received Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update (PA2016-091) Newport Ridge August 30, 2016 verizon' Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Item No. 2b Additional Materials Received Verizon Coverage V1A K IDUn*ffteprolp&s LnTEcom Update (PA2016-091) 1'' Legend LTE:RSRP-Coverage(0) GOOD OKAY WORST nllq 'yY CanYan I � n 4 t N f F Newport Ridge a ; N HI •� M M pO van r 4 4 i 1 ' 1 1 Ton.cad,� — , W s 0 0,1 U 0.3.1 • y. _N E95 r verizonl/ z Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Item No. 2b Additional Materials Received Verizon Coverage wit t IiccLieTEaciu deaplecom Update (PA2O16-091) legend LTE:RSRP-Coverage(0) GOOD OF-.ti HORST 0 c �c mese RT W ' , 1 FI iT 1 .�1 r Al M - v n. n o.1 o.emi �- NewMrt verizoni/ 3 TKS Line of Sight Survlynning Commission - Septemb*N2L? X16 TELKOM SOLUTIONS Item No. 2b Additional Materials Received Coyote CgSM,&ANQWMfAQW tion and Telecom Update (PA2016-091) Azimuth: 130 degrees •Line of sight verified from as low as 31-ft. • Proposed MW antenna facing Signal Peak at 31-ft or higher •Approximate cable length is 80-ft. • Lat: 33°36'47.01"N Long: 117°49'21.20"W • Address: 20662 Newport Coast Drive Irvine Flash coming from Signal Peak Flash coming from Signal Peak Y • Close up view of flash coming from Signal Peak as viewed Distant view of flash coming from Signal Peak as viewed from Newport Ridge Relo at 31-ft. from Newport Ridge Relo at 31-ft. Proposed MW facing Signal Peak Signal Peak is over here n View towards Signal Peak as viewed from Newport Ridge Relo at 31-ft View of proposed location at Newport Ridge Relo Page 1 of 3 TKS Line of Sight Survlynning Commission - Septemb*N2L? X16 TELKOM SOLUTIONS Item No. 2b Additional Materials Received Coyote Canyon&9emolition and Telecom Update (PA2016-091) Azimuth: 310 degrees 7284 Ridge Route,Newport Coast, CA 33 36 20 N, 117 48 43 W • Line of sight verified from as low as 60-ft(2 different locations on Newport Ridge Relo end) •Proposed MW antenna facing Newport Ridge Relo at 60-ft(Existing location) • Approximate cable length is 140-ft. Flash coming from Newport Ridge Relo (Permanent location) r; Flash coming from Newport Ridge Relo (Permanent location) ti r Close up view of flash coming from Newport Ridge Relo Distant view of flash coming from Newport Ridge Relo (Permanent location)as viewed from Signal Peak at 60-ft. (Permanent location)as viewed from Signal Peak at 60-ft. Existing location of Newport Ridge MW antenna @ 60' c/I (Leave as is for all 2 proposed Newport Ridge Relo locations) I Existing location for Newport Ridge MW antenna @ 60' c/1 View of entire Signal Peak tower Page 2 of 3 TKS Line of Sight Survlynning Commission - Septemb*N2L? X16 TELKOM SOLUTIONS Item No. 2b Additional Materials Received Coyote Canyon&9emolition and Telecom Update (PA2016-091) Azimuth: 310 degrees •Line of sight verified from as low as 60-ft(2 different locations on Newport Ridge Relo end) • Proposed MW antenna facing Newport Ridge Relo at 60-ft(Existing location) •Approximate cable length is 140-ft. d. 1 View of cable run from equipment shelter to tower View of cable hatch inside equipment shelter t •-*ti--- NF'-, ORT RIDGE l Close up view of Newport Ridge radio modem �I o View of available rack space inside equipment shelter Page 3 of 3 Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Item No. 2c Additional Materials Received Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update (PA2016-091) September 21,2016 By Email: James Campbell City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, CA John Amau Manager, Environmental Services, CEQA/Habitat Support OC Waste&Recycling Chris Matthews Project Manager OC Waste&Recycling Re: Verizon Wireless Response to Letter Dated 9/12/16 from Jim McGee, Dan Wampole, Gerry Ross. Dear Mr. Campbell,Amau and Matthews: Verizon Wireless appreciates the recent meeting with Mr. Wampole and Mr. McGee and shares their expressed desire that residents, businesses and visitors in the local area have the latest and greatest wireless communications technology. We provide information to address comments made in their letter. Regarding the implementation of Fifth Generation(5G),members of the public should know that standards development organizations are currently drafting 5G proposals but an adopted standard is not anticipated in 2016. With 5G, end users will enjoy wireless service that delivers several gigabits per second throughputs and single- millisecond latencies. Verizon has taken a leadership position in partnering with industry leaders to drive development and demonstrate the benefits of 5G technology. Verizon has not announced a launch date for a 5G commercial deployment. Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Item No. 2c Additional Materials Received Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update (PA2016-091) Regarding the implementation of Long Term Evolution(LTE),the current installation is functioning for handsets that support the feature. The proposed re-located installation will include the necessary equipment and software that enables LTE Advanced. LTE Advanced simply means we have carrier aggregation deployed—which means that we have equipment and software deployed that allows customers with capable devices to use multiple frequencies at the same time. Members of the public correctly point out a marketing map found on the Internet shows Verizon signal coverage in the area. The map depicts the predicted coverage level at low resolution and is not intended to account for dynamic conditions present in higher resolutions. Verizon agrees with the view of members of the public that"regarding the appearance of the faux tree towers, we would like the selected"species"to be the one that offers the thickest foliage, which at this time appears to be Eucalyptus. Based on the simulations provided,Eucalyptus will provide the highest level of screening and be the most compatible with the site's existing trees and the new natural ones that will be installed during the landscape restoration". The faux tree structure will accommodate fixture equipment such as radios and antennas that enables future growth. Both appearance and functionality are necessary features of the structure. State and federal resource agencies and the County,which owns the property, control the re-vegetation plan. Verizon's concern is that re-vegetation does not obscure the signal for our facility and impact usability of services. Community members correctly point out the need for our microwave dish to connect in an unobstructed manner with the microwave dish on Signal Peak for purposes of providing interconnect. Without the appropriate elevation for signal propagation, Verizon's facility will not function. Finally,Verizon provides wireless communications services, including a private network,to several local agencies charged with protecting the community and its citizens. . It is imperative we maintain a high level of wireless communications service for emergency first responders. The Verizon Wireless network not only provides every day telephone service, but is also an important component of emergency response systems used in the event of fires, earthquakes,floods,and other natural disasters. The facility will also accommodate federally mandated E-911 equipment that will permit emergency responders to determine the location of 911 callers. With the trend of"cord-cutting"reducing landline communication in many Newport Beach communities, wireless telephone and data service has become essential. Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Item No. 2c Additional Materials Received Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update (PA2016-091) Please call me to discuss this important matter and to schedule a meeting if you have any questions about our service or facilities. It is important to maintain continuity in our communications service for the residents,workers and emergency personnel of the City. Very truly yours, %rk Kay Director—System Performance Verizon Wireless Attachment: Letter Dated 9/12/16 from Jim McGee, Dan Wampole,Gerry Ross cc: Newport Beach Planning Commission, City of Newport Beach Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Item No. 2c Additional Materials Received Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update (PA2016-091) September 12, 2016 John Arnau, Manager, Environmental Services, CEQA/Habitat Support OC Waste & Recycling Chris Matthews Project Manager OC Waste & Recycling James Campbell Principal Planner City of Newport Beach Gentlemen, We would like to thank you again for arranging the recent meeting at the project site. Dan and Gerry found it to be both highly informative and enlightening. Perhaps the most important piece of information we learned was the need to have an unobstructed microwave signal between the project site and Signal Peak in order to provide network communication, a little-known fact that had not been stated during any of the previous discussions or in the documents.This would explain the justification for having at least one antenna at a certain height in order to establish the link.We had always assumed that a hardwired underground connection existed between the project site and the network. We also learned that placing antennas around the project site's perimeter wall and adjusting their degree of tilt in order to fine-tune and achieve the widest amount of coverage would still be a compromise design compared to installing conventional towers with circular antenna arrays, especially if these wall-mounted antennas might hinder the implementation of future technology. Finally, if several clusters of wall-mounted antennas were to be placed 20' or up to 50' above the wall,their appearance could likely result in an even worse aesthetic appearance. That said, and given the carriers' attempt a few years ago to install a new monolithic cell tower structure along Newport Coast Drive in order to improve acknowledged coverage deficiencies for each network in the area, we were shocked to learn that none of the carriers had made any attempt during this planning process to reevaluate the quality of service at this site and to improve and to optimize it during the relocation.The AT&T engineer never mentioned when its next generation technology,5G,would be implemented here, and at the same time,we learned that Verizon's equipment here is already one generation behind its current technology and nothing was said about bringing it current or preparing it for the carrier's next generation technology, LTEAdvanced. Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Item No. 2c Additional Materials Received While we are in@C�Md ieguflj? Wun 9mdg1dI*aoahc t@nWA2016-091) future coverage once the permanent towers are in operation, we are very skeptical about the information that has been provided and that which will be forthcoming.The reason for this is simple— just take a look at the nationally published maps from both AT&T and Verizon,which ignore the varied terrain, the elevation changes and the roadway patterns, and completely misrepresent the level of service here in Newport Coast. In fact, based on these maps, one would assume that 100% coverage is available everywhere in Newport Beach, which it clearly is not. AT&T AT&T Maps _ Wireless Coverage Type DornellVVlrelem Data Coverage u. sora m r � me me mesw,..Puemam.mmusdv. domestic voce o O O �> amv • Gam LOCOYaa Go'MartAServ[e µy.q Yew Coverage W Device Tyne eGLM' ac ac Intemaamul voce Inv. om eQoamoma b._ ;sq• Q Your srrrt eaaal OGLTE' Will MP"4GLTE VIM W^ Lnmrme Wed "no VIM 3fOPeMW r• n. � amPiry G RG• ]rCParo M Verizon Check your coverage Me na anal Cerraga See oletalea nfornraton about coverage 92657 In vow area by searct ng ins nap aC LTE Data Coverage Data CoverageI& a Voloe&Moakagage RepaOo Pd9b to TalkA r„ , r o kaerrYWgrt a9fann . ��I Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Item No. 2c Additional Materials Received During our comiOUi m{@U[DWybfpQj1g btejmvOy RmffipJAtD@mofibbnmdsTedeimmvtopdgte (PA2016-091) follows: • Remove the existing exhaust stack and don't replace it with another tower (or towers). • Improve cellular reception along Newport Coast Drive and along the#73 toll road. Since there is a near-universal aversion to cell towers among the residents here,the only way the community would support this project would be some form of compensating factor, like an improvement in cellular service. However,the carriers have no plans to improve service or install the newest technology available during the relocation.We are also concerned that once the carriers have spent considerable funds for both the temporary and permanent towers, it will be a very long time before they commit additional funds for future improvements here. We believe that if the carriers want to install the towers then they must commit to the community and to their many customers here by correcting the existing deficiencies, upgrading their equipment to current standards by the time the permanent towers are installed,and by installing 5G and LTE Advanced technologies as soon as they become available.This is the only way the community will accept the aesthetic compromise of having two large faux tree towers installed in plain view. Regarding the appearance of the faux tree towers,we would like the selected "species"to be the one that offers the thickest foliage, which at this time appears to be Eucalyptus. Based on the simulations provided, Eucalyptus will provide the highest level of screening and be most compatible with the site's existing trees and the new natural ones that will be installed during the landscape restoration. Concerning the size the new natural trees to be installed, we would like them to be as large as possible at installation so that they will blend in quickly, provide adequate screening to the property's perimeter walls, screen the towers as depicted in the simulations (or better), and not require a time frame of 20 years for this to be achieved. In closing,we want the carriers to commit to providing the much needed and long-overdue service and equipment upgrades, to the highest level of current technology, and that this commitment is made a condition of approval for this project. For OC Waste & Recycling, we request that the most effective faux tree design be selected and the largest natural trees installed. We feel that the technology request, in particular, is reasonable and one that the community here deserves, and is the only one it will support. Sincerely, Jim McGee President, Pelican Hill Community Association President, Newport Coast Community Association Phone: (949) 640-0500 iimmcgeeC@mcgee-law.com Dan Wampole President, Newport Ridge Community Association Resident,The Summit HOA Phone: (949) 466-8591 wampole@me.com Gerry Ross Vice President, Pelican Hill Community Association Phone: (949) 285-6630 gerrvross@gmail.com Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Item No. 2d Additional Materials Received JJ 1r n poyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update (PA2016-091) LLtSprint 6591 Irvine Ctr Dr, IRVINE, CA 92618 Site OG25XC211—Coyote Canyon Landfill Recovery Site This is to confirm that the relocated site—OG25XC211—is funded for the latest Sprint Technology,termed LTE Plus. LTE Plus operates in the 2.5 GHz range and supports LTE features like Carrier Aggregation and Antenna Beamforming. It will support Peak speeds of about 100 Mbps near the site location*. Two Small Cells are also funded for the immediate area (Newport Coast Drive&San Joaquim Hills Road; Newport Coast Drive &Vista Ridge Road) as part of the Densification and Optimization Project. These two Small Cells will provide LTE Plus service in localized areas, serving approximately 200 yards, enhancing Download Speeds. Coverage will be dependent upon the final Antenna Height, localized surroundings and terrain features. Ideally, backhaul for the two Small Cells would be provided by LTE Plus on OG25XC211. Funding is also being requested to improve coverage on the 73 Toll Road and Newport Coast Drive (near Pelican Hill Rd N). * Sample OOKLA Speedtest results taken at in the City of Santa Ana (Main St& Bishop), approximately 100 yards from the cell site. n- SPEEDTEST 77 RESULTS 9 p yi ©)D 5'm i 17.02 16.09 36 112.01 16.99 39 T'I 93.22 15.99 45 86.07 15.68 40 83.96 i 38 W- ABOUTSPEEUTEST RESULTS SETTINGS Coyote Canyon Landfill - Gas Recov ry Facility and Telecom Update ( PA20:L6 -og:L) s �Y Planning Commission Public Hearing September 22, 2o16 o� e Introduction C P qC/ppu ■ Demolition of existing landfill -gas recovery structures • Removal of 105-foot-tall exhaust stack ■ Flaring infrastructure to remain • Installation of temporary telecom structures Two collocated monopoles — 65 feet high • Installation of permanent telecom structures Two collocated faux eucalyptus trees — 65 feet high ■ Removal of temporary telecom structures ■ Removal and replacement of dead/dying trees 09/22/2016 Community Development Department- Planning Division 2 '(PA20'f. Introduction (Cont . ) Planning Applications Required 1 Conditional Use Permit Class 4Telecom Installations + 15 feet above height limit 2 Limited Term Permit Class 5 Telecom Installations Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 09/22/2oi6 Community Development Department- Planning Division 3 , Ib as a A Coyote Canyon Landfill £ (,0/. R _` Sage Hill School y M . Newport Coast '^a, �e 4. , {{�� y ,t• - j \� Shopping Center ¢`� � Sr _ Or i Planning Commission - September1 • Item No. 2e A d clitional Materials Presented at Meeting XI V r 00 1 iy Lt w r , 93 v ` A 928 ft. ;.. . C. ♦ a� y � ` �, Planning' Commission - September 22, 2016 PI O. FA Item No. 2 Additional Materials Presented at Meeting FAR � g oyo a anyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update (PA2016-091) 9— Os ■ Os J 4 a Og US 1 t Q Q 9�. 3 a as \\ 14P r 'Oc --PC,53-. 600 R • • • ' •0 Bon • ' • f 6508 600 R _ 700 ft tow Ys ), r 650 ft ► '..J✓ t i 65.4 750 ft 700ft , i f 750 ft .fir.;.. ✓— ^, '} BORA �.N . • 650 ft m aCQt E:U[ Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 T` °m°"` ' Item No. 2e Additional Materials Presented at Meeting nyon a ecovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update (PA2016-091) tIM[5 IO0 H 1¢E[ErED O 12'-0 4 OSW E PIVD }f' Oto aw_�rro. TO P[IEw JE)carwfcna TO P[lWl (D 0/0 yv f1U:°0uE IEIIPIY[$ EIL nR i[I. ca n a°cau EEY m xyw MIT roam solo RrpGID Piu1e[ONla M°aGE aRlww _M�' ePna ro ParR Ism b iIWESfpPQE ^ ttl'ner Pa[[ ,..y .. (L)Cw v[L TO RWM O �O ([)aEm ''1•�- IE)VFAQa1 xMlEsf'Av4 ///��� ED cm mom ��ICmwRfin (E)cacwnw alta PUi,w"Pw M marc 10P r0 L 94[EFa b a[w1 iii \\ 0 R RYP[D '✓ \\V RP m Raw iiiP Pw - TO SaM[EERIE - wnb QI a'-Ef '- q•srREr ROC N[G6i IIbnE _ R11a101 R vap EERMa$IR REMFD IIDJIDm ro�°u O aaL ro Raw m vrr oaamvne n O r e Y�bEc U °PEYw f i ;wTuir lZIC1aUL OORR d lq aU PML �'Spaar IML a]WEm ,. OWE M,IT)POEMR Ra°.!D Tow ro O O N• (E)'SOREE aD'a!T PNU .wows EEalwb w maErsr roRP TO R P[U1GIb (E)LW!°I'wD T- van EEEImIt wNll(D w [xlMEsr rawu MO[a1EROEr EXISTING m`M°CATIM (E)1-IE[R['EEMIRI 'E°EH[w (E)PCCESS°aE IFAS aaA ro Ptaw p Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 ;� gNG[SSGw Item No. 2e Additional Materials Presented at Meeting n n as Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update (PA2016-091) IEr+iu m�w air IEI a w1 iw � )waa••r-roeEE�/cEu R)M CBwNEABR SOJ•S i[WIIMr Itltll'hf i 1bD 91W1 �. � O � NO4pN lam'OIMK) 6 �mr�rnul ro mEw °/o /// � GWIIP[IQ�aElors) IIR 7B M. f (a)'9rNE•rGrM a W4 1�IIM Tw�al�l1 losoEwr yoMJrtll a 'A' ' Bo melba Cb[WEtt eNS,m EurtaEN® Imlel ro mEe �FIEEI•UL YroMpO eEENwrrldotwurca \�!' [rAOSUF(Br r- Or T P)xRza'a NosE ' j .} a[BNrprt rpPggE M mwa (aJ -NOsi e'ru' ///qq��� 1I18eale6 a (q'Flsr owfn rl[Iwa frXOSUE(8+'18 �~ (E) II&r P ro In 04 aNi ro wwN �lrr COIL (E)uv ro WpW1� (q wuEr sn¢s'aro �)c[xwlro MwrMFD ro (q cllWWt ro R11M1 p a� IE)�fR¢ox am£4. iii 0��1�y' fan+on sraErEx ro larw ; i �.rt 'N (E) AW EQw101r 9Rh8 i0 PJy1N—� �� / IFI'sRvrt'roEFrt s� R(Mua'r 1t48cM (FI'sanxE �4Rp _ awEl NriMNS RPE 4YK.P110 10(F)W � WNL 10 MYl1 2SPRNf aCNA po.c .1 WI w1Xw(E)BENLNc ..� 1f1'SP'M11'E1fCINCM CW Wr Or(E)p fN 11( • aursa ar Elau ru .� (F)'SPIdNf X411 YWwFO LNL IPAv i0 RfrM TEMPORARYE (E)K[E4 GU (aaEIIbM[M me W 1116 e-3 IUY NIU TO 1prN 7 (J;!��r}ktM �� •. rr r19e5 erns Planning Comr 16issio�a(��etfaex.?� Os1 Item No. 2e Additional M at " ) etin13 ww io^.�.---- - - WINE1De.SAD 0Fr[eeUlloll W M[e1[M 6 ME PFO/P a'IEt f yo any Recovery Facility Demolition and T Iewf ,��l�`-�91) i .:� swu H al-9t(Dc oNspE M rt9t Hoer-a-aTr. `W 1�m 4JB ?eu q(c N nlE 0.91[RLMS-6I-°',r 9uu EpLw CRYS rM[Wa ten_ MR CVJIQ 1).NI. It ,/Eg �`,, 1 IN 1NIetRD fNCMLHEMI OFM 6 2GIIF0 IOR Ia°Mt AcrM16 eIIIN M fMS f19t 9iiR-V-rMT. 9Y(9L IIM. 1 m y 4 lll ellrimr( ° � .. cnllRlull m SYM1 � � �Y[99,M. (�f115 ( ; (p ea nlwlsranal f , Do mwnn •� eww(n ro To s 4EL710G`+ x r1p au eu ro �,t (rtwaiwlepxa F_ i4 (P)wexa(°7w . . � O(IYWIID YOpPq(lT an[16) (1)'Aw VME(alpelt \ (PI'I-1p1(L I'MII TO TMY4i09SP$ Pf[YCUM(D ro fp Ou � \\A/\{C`/(}� ttl(NM�YWf10M 1Ml eua ro Irtuel ro w1w� (()Wets spas'w1¢ (al[ A (DN°lo( 111Ipws rn(xouerm Io IY1V11 eeYq (q au eru ro nO1w 10 °see Eauwtxr s1E(Iw ro wIw / ,---- N // lv yD <F nPFWSe iR101 - MIFpMS f es(UOU eau ro O/a ai (E)'SOME 1319 OD.L AT IE)YCCA 1III1M(Q YD11C r cane Iua Ilc sorsa[a(n to pu w m'svmxr euA 19eim - (f: vac rvr ro low .r V�ielElr IoiOwC0N1"p- . 'i� tp`melr runexr•- �•—�� Ixix uoxw°"ro-ffw¢rvnrs ft-a' PERMANENT ® ro e r 0 AMC= ° trP d as • • • '• • 1r .� •■d • • • ■ • • b i/� d•• •• ••■ M • •,, • s ^ • i • ' IIIIL''611 in � � ' �•• • as MON IN III 00 us a I� ■ • VTrms to be Fkvmoved ■ 10 Eucalyptus ■ IN • • CS,IJSSIO � r 1 / %4' � QO Tme Planting with 15ft Canopy Radius O 0 Coast live Oak iplanted in gmupa OP3, IHR on remerJ 0 EucaOak- p fistingExisting C] Oak.-Pacisting • Peruvian Pepper-Existing ` 0 Wtstem SycmumeWbac Alder Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Item No. 2e Additional Materials Presented at Meeting Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update (PA2016-091 ) x17A s T _,r - SCAM Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Item No. 2e Additional Materials Presented at Meeting Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update (PA2016-091 ) I'QOPOEEO MONOEUCALYPTU6,\L N . 1 y LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Item No. 2e Additional Materials Presented at Meeting Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update (PA2016-091 ) I•HOPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS PROPOSED LANDSCAPING ,PROPOSED LANDSCAPIN F LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Item No. 2e Additional Materials Presented at Meeting Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update (PA2016-091 ) L sem• �, ; Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Item No. 2e Additional Materials Presented at Meeting Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update (PA2016-091 ) PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTU6` PROP05ED MONOEUCALYPTU5, 1 Mr y wO L AIM' Loo KING Nor.TrfEn_,T ProN, NCVrro RT Coa=T DRIVE Planning Commission - September 22, 2016 Item No. 2e Additional Materials Presented at Meeting Coyote Canyon Gas Recovery Facility Demolition and Telecom Update (PA2016-091 ) PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS\ .PROPOSED MONOEUCALYPTUS ROPOtCD I.ANDf CAPING i n 'j LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM NEWPORT COAST DRIVE • • fSeptqmber ♦ IV, / Ty. r � 06 IB d� 1/ �-, gilt (PA201. General Plan/Zoning Code ■ Natural Resources Policy NR 21 . 1 "Signs, utilities and antennas shall be sited and designed to minimize visual impacts" ■ OS - when collocating on existing facility " Facility" includes land No alternative location meeting objectives ■ Collocating encouraged and included 09/22/2oi6 Community Development Department- Planning Division 20 eta'Vit,, (PA201` Required Findings Exceed height limit by 15 feet Reduction of overall vertical height by 40 feet Maintain existing antenna height = maintain coverage Design will blend into visual landscape Remains accessory to gas recovery use No higher preference facility (e . g ., stealth) 09/22/2oi6 Community Development Department- Planning Division eta'Vit,, _`(PA201. Temporary Instailations Only while permanents are constructed Existing trees remain for most of duration F Nesting bird season through September 2017 Helps buffer monopoles structures 09/22/20i6 Community Development Department- Planning Division 22 CEQA Review Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 30-day public review period (August 3 — September z) Mitigation measures included to reduce : Aesthetics Biological Resources Cultural Resources Hazards/Hazardous Materials Land Use/Planning Transportation/Traffic 09/22/20i6 Community Development Department- Planning Division 23 (PA20 T ■Recommendation Conduct a public hearing; and Adopt a resolution adopting MND No . ND2o16 - 002 and approving CUP No . UP2016 -024 and LTP No . XP2o16 - 007 09/22/2oi6 Community Development Department- Planning Division 24 1 t 1• *• 1 f 1 T r I For more information contact: Benjamin M.Zdeba,AICP 949-644-3253 bzdebaQa newportbeachca.gov www.newport�eachca.gov