Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAM0086ETITION 86 OLO. NO. 63� SEC 1.4,9 3.960 11R CI' QF �MOM.,BEACH DATE. APPLICATION FEE ZRO.00 1340 Be 6th St® M APPLICANT'S NAME: QhR-olgM Be Maak. Tmatee HOME ADD: _Wj==U_&_�. ONE PP,OPERTY ADDRFSSs 3100 B. Coast Hi ona del,-X&2Z0NB4.*_ 0-I and R-2 r.W ' 14C lots I & p - LEGAL Dzsc:-TRACT Corona del MaMCT: l-Tr/3-'R1() BLOCK 457 LOT _22._._.. INSTRUCTIONS (READ CAREFULLY): F�11 out this petition carefully. This Petitionmust be made by one or more oimers of property affected by the proposed amendmentanl,Must be accompanied by a map showing the location of property of the signers of the P-�ftitioh-1 the use of such property and the use of all property adjacent thereto. The Petv4ioner'," shall also suhmit any other data or information requested by the Planning CommisS*Nlon*'11'-�,,� The Petitioner desires to amend Section Of Ord, No. 635 so as to causeVth property to fall within an 0-1 _c Jstrlct, ox, to. J& 3. No resider -tial property Is affected by the razoning of that portion of lot 22 from R-2 to 0-1. Said lot being separated frons: Block 437 ro the rAlley, as shown on map skotoh karewithe- T'ne reasons for the filing of this Petition are as follows:- TkLe widening of ;oast Hi&hwa-Y forced the owner,slarvey and cut ac ons that onion, of lot .lowing more room for qbile Oil Statione Balance of lot 22 pa=ot bvLaVAIN ,P uax id Is a Tburden. gaid .12ro]2 ort Y nom assesaed two... different arce STATE OF CALIFO-11NIA) 3S. COUNTY OF ORM4M 1, the undersigned, being duly ;sworn,, depose and say that,1 am the Fbtitioner, and that the'.! � foregoing Petition and all data,"'informationand evidence herewithsubmitted are in : all respects to the beat of qr knowledge and belief, true and correct.. evPZ4 >e4 Signature of Fatitioner The above Subscribed and sworn to before me on the 3A day of h l9 No Public my carr 71 r (SEAL) L,(_)NINGAM M11,1ENT NO. IM ARI N G: DATE. In accordance Ath Section the amendment as Totlitioned 'for above is hereby A-5 GRANTED, subject to all the conditions hereinatter set forth, and shail be of no force or effect whatsoeier until such conditions are met, or -antil satisfactory guarantees and/or evidence requirements are presanted and accepted. The undersigned bereby certifies t4at he has read, has f'Qll knowledge of, and agrees to all', of the conditions set forth herein. Signature of Permitee: FOP DEPARTMENTAL USE ONLY FINDINGS OF FLMMING COMMISSION: The Com z -,*ion rec-)=ended denial of this anpl.ica:ion foz: reasons: -Zo rezona 1"nis ons narcal would be "spot zoning." zorlT abur.ting Secona Avenue in Corona del Mar Lind L � .---)r)1-.",,cat1on wmra approved it wo-old sat a prccediant fog otlk-lcr petition,,4 T.I. D GURE= by Planning Co,und ssion 00, :TES D U Y by City Counc On t ]960 7 day day o On the Of Secretary, nninF C�rrni ssion City Cler4 COP, Reso'iution No. _aril 20 i9 60 Amendment No. 86 .� CITY PLANNING COMMISSION NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA REPORT OF: Planning Ccission BY: Planning Department T0: City Council Petition filed by Charles E. Mack, Trustee, to rezone Leat 22, Black 437, 0N: located at 426 Jasmine Avanue, Corona del Mar, from an R-2 to a C-1 District. =s PROCEDURE FOLLOWED BY PLANNING C(1M USS ION: Notice of public hearing s duly published in the Newport Harbor News Prese on March 25, 196€3. Dee pu61ic hearing was conducted on ,April 7, 1960. FINDINGS OF PLANNING CONMISSION: The Co issfon, upon a review of the application and after a physical =amina- tion of the 3ub,ject property, recommuds to the City Council that thio applica- _i.on be denied for the following, reasons: 1. To rezone this one parcel would be "spot zoning." 2. There is no c,7mmerclal zone abutting Second Avenue in Corona del Mar and the Cc ission felt that if this application were approved it would set a precedent for other petitions to rezone. R,ECOMENDATIONS OF Pi.EsldPdING COMISSI-UN: The Planning Commission recommends to the City Co€ancil, that A ndmeat No. 86 filed by Charles E. Pack, Trustee, be denied for the reasons set forth above. RESULTS OF ROLL CALL VOTE: MES: Cleeace, Conalin, Hudson, Marshall, Skinner and Stselautn NOES: Wicker, Lind ABSENT- Rudd NOT VOTING: None By order of the Chairman �S Georize 3, Lind +r ji 04 I hereby certify t=eat the above is a true Approved by the City Counc_l;�41 e and correct report of the proceedings andcagy of k9 1� � action of the Planning Caission, City of Newport Deach. Respectfully submitted o Secretary ��4.L u �� ��— L�k-A- Newport Beach City Planning Cormission City Clark City of Newport each, California bAnk W ofCorona 0#1 kor. .SG rso"'� ""f most nnr AT a K7 :v wir t norm 5f ; the 'ZIO'vish ;I AO;4q Ko laid Uns, 6.40 feet W the SKA" northerly owner of Let 22; Wence tooth 2V MV last, 41ang Ko o nwbowe lws! Ws 4,.�'t"O' %he tie lat a begIvning. 3' 17 i I 131 20 211 22 231 .1S . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .............. 7's 14 .17 .22 23 24 301 J 'lk 2 5th . day of ____-.__ ryfar E .._.__._.___.____, (SEAL) Notary Public in and for said County and State. My Commission Expires RC}i3's.� )IT F, WILLITES PLACE ANY AND ALL PERSONS INTERESTED MAY APPEAR AND BE REAM THEREON. RAY Y. COPELIN, SECRETARY NEWPORT BEACH CITY PLANNING COMMISSION