HomeMy WebLinkAboutFinance Committee - May 10, 2018CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
FINANCE COMMITTEE AGENDA - Final
100 Civic Center Drive - Crystal Cove Conference Room, Bay 2D
Thursday, May 10, 2018 - 3:00 PM
Finance Committee Members:
Diane Dixon, Chair / Council Member
Will O'Neill, Mayor Pro Tem
Kevin Muldoon, Council Member
William Collopy, Committee Member
Patti Gorczyca, Committee Member
Joe Stapleton, Committee Member
Larry Tucker, Committee Member
Staff Members:
Dave Kiff, City Manager
Carol Jacobs, Assistant City Manager
Dan Matusiewicz, Finance Director / Treasurer
Steve Montano, Deputy Director, Finance
Marlene Burns, Administrative Specialist to the Finance Director
The Finance Committee meeting is subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act. Among other things, the Brown Act requires that
the Finance Committee agenda be posted at least seventy-two (72) hours in advance of each regular meeting and that
the public be allowed to comment on agenda items before the Committee and items not on the agenda but are within
the subject matter jurisdiction of the Finance Committee. The Chair may limit public comments to a reasonable amount
of time, generally three (3) minutes per person.
The City of Newport Beach’s goal is to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an
attendee or a participant at this meeting, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, we will
attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact Dan Matusiewicz, Finance Director, at least
forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is
feasible at (949) 644-3123 or dmatusiewicz@newportbeachca.gov.
NOTICE REGARDING PRESENTATIONS REQUIRING USE OF CITY EQUIPMENT
Any presentation requiring the use of the City of Newport Beach’s equipment must be submitted to the Finance
Department 24 hours prior to the scheduled meeting.
I.CALL MEETING TO ORDER
II.ROLL CALL
III.PUBLIC COMMENTS
Public comments are invited on agenda and non-agenda items generally considered to be
within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Finance Committee. Speakers must limit comments
to three (3) minutes. Before speaking, we invite, but do not require, you to state your name for
the record. The Finance Committee has the discretion to extend or shorten the speakers’ time
limit on agenda or non-agenda items, provided the time limit adjustment is applied equally to all
speakers. As a courtesy, please turn cell phones off or set them in the silent mode.
IV.CONSENT CALENDAR
May 10, 2018
Page 2
Finance Committee Meeting
MINUTES OF APRIL 12, 2018A.
Recommended Action:
Approve and file.
DRAFT MINUTES 041218
V.CURRENT BUSINESS
FINANCE COMMITTEE BUDGET REVIEWA.
Summary:
The Finance Committee has had the opportunity to review the City Manager’s
2018-2019 proposed Budget documents and a brief power point presentation. Staff
will provide a high-level variance analysis to the Committee members and will
address certain questions raised by the Finance Committee during the April
meeting. Staff will be available to answer any further questions the Committee may
have pertaining to the 2018-2019 City Manager Proposed Budget.
Recommended Action:
Discuss and ask questions as necessary.
LONG RANGE FINANCIAL FORECAST (LRFF)B.
Summary:
Staff will provide a preview and update on the latest draft of our new Long Range
Financial Forecast.
Recommended Action:
Receive and file.
AGREED UPON PROCEDURES (AUP) ON INTERNAL CONTROLSC.
Summary:
Staff will provide an oral update on AUP performed by City auditors, White Nelson
Diehl Evans. The intent of the AUP is to test the City’s internal control processes and
procedures of Wire Transfers and certain other electronic payments.
Recommended Action:
Receive and file.
May 10, 2018
Page 3
Finance Committee Meeting
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (AD) 117 UPDATED.
Summary:
Staff will provide an oral update on the progress of AD 117. This AD was formed by
property owners within the area bounded by Bayside Drive, Avocado Ave, Coast
Highway and Carnation Avenue with the intent to underground overhead utilities.
Property owners were provided the option of paying their assessment in cash. The
balance of the assessment will be financed by the City secured by the real property
of the property owners. This is “No-Commitment Debt” meaning neither the faith nor
credit of the City of the Newport Beach will be pledged as collateral or as a further
backstop for the proposed financing.
Recommended Action:
Receive and file.
UPTOWN NEWPORT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD) UPDATEE.
Summary:
The Uptown Newport development agreement stated that staff would work
cooperatively to form a CFD to finance the undergrounding of overhead electrical
power transmission lines. Staff will brief the Finance Committee on the topic as the
project appears to be moving forward for Council consideration soon. The proposed
financing is secured by the real property currently owned by the developer(s). The is
“No-Commitment Debt” meaning neither the faith nor credit of the City of the Newport
Beach will be pledged as collateral or as a further backstop for the proposed
financing.
Recommended Action:
Receive and file.
RISK BASED RESERVE STATUS UPDATEF.
Summary:
Staff will provide an oral update on the Risk Based Reserve Study being performed
by the Government Finance Officers’ Association (GFOA) of the United States and
Canada.
Recommended Action:
Receive and file.
WORK PLAN REVIEWG.
Summary:
Staff will review with the Committee the agenda topics scheduled for the remainder
of the calendar year.
Recommended Action:
Receive and file.
May 10, 2018
Page 4
Finance Committee Meeting
VI.FINANCE COMMITTEE ANNOUNCEMENTS ON MATTERS WHICH MEMBERS
WOULD LIKE PLACED ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION, ACTION OR
REPORT (NON-DISCUSSION ITEM)
VII.ADJOURNMENT
Finance Committee Meeting Minutes April 12, 2018
Page 1 of 12
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH FINANCE COMMITTEE APRIL 12, 2018 MEETING MINUTES I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 3:00 p.m. in the Crystal Cove Conference Room, Bay 2D, 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California 92660.
II. ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Council Member Diane Dixon (Chair), Mayor Pro Tem Will O'Neill,
Council Member Kevin Muldoon, Committee Member William Collopy, Committee Member Patti Gorczyca, Committee Member Joe Stapleton,
and Committee Member Larry Tucker
ABSENT: None.
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Dave Kiff, Assistant City Manager Carol Jacobs, Finance Director/Treasurer Dan Matusiewicz, Deputy Director/Finance Steve
Montano, Budget Manager Susan Giangrande, Accounting Manager Rukshana Virany, Fire Chief Chip Duncan, Public Works Finance
Administrative Manager Jamie Copeland, Fire Assistant Chief Jeff Boyles, Purchasing Agent Anthony Nguyen, Budget Analyst Amy Mayfield, Budget
Analyst James Tai, Fire Administrative Manager Angela Crespi, Budget and Payroll Supervisor Shannon Espinoza, and Administrative Specialist
to the Finance Director Marlene Burns.
MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC: Jim Mosher
III. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Chair Dixon opened public comments. Noting there were no members of the public who elected to
speak on this item, Chair Dixon closed public comments. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. MINUTES OF MARCH 15, 2018 Recommended Action:
Approve and file.
MOTION: Committee Member Tucker moved, and Committee Member Gorczyca seconded, to approve the minutes, with changes on page 6 of 10 as proposed by Committee Member
Gorczyca. The motion carried (6 – 0, Council Member Muldoon abstaining). V. CURRENT BUSINESS
A. FISCAL YEAR 2018-2019 BUDGET BRIEF OVERVIEW Summary:
Staff will prepare brief presentation of key initiatives proposed in the City Manager’s Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Proposed Budget.
Recommended Action: Receive and File
Finance Committee Meeting Minutes April 12, 2018
Page 2 of 12
Finance Director/Treasurer Dan Matusiewicz displayed a PowerPoint Presentation providing a
brief overview of the proposed 2018-2019 Fiscal Year Budget. Slides included Summary (All Funds), General Fund Sources and Uses, Proposed Use of 2016-2017 Surplus, General Fund
Revenue, General Fund Expenditures, General Fund Transfers, Recurring Internal Service Charges, Pension Funding (All Funds), Level Dollar Payment Strategy, Staffing Changes,
Budget Reductions, Program Enhancements (City Clerk, Community Development Department, Finance Department, Fire Department, Human Resource Department, Library
Department, Municipal Operations Department, Police Department, Public Works Department, Recreation & Senior Services Department), Authorized Positions by ORG, Bargaining Unit
Contract End Date, Budget Checklist, Upcoming Dates (Tentative), and Citizen Transparency Portal/Newport Beach Open Budget.
Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz provided a summary which noted the budget is
balanced, revenues are still growing, but at a lower rate, expenditures remain relatively flat except for program enhancements which will be reviewed later on in this presentation, and the
proposed budget adheres to Council guidance on Policy F-5 regarding the use of the Fiscal Year 2016-2017 budget surplus (50% for infrastructure and 50% to pay down existing
obligations). In addition, there will continue to be an aggressive payment schedule toward the unfunded pension liability ($34.5 million across all funds, $8.8 million which is discretionary),
staffing is proposed to be up 1.0 full time and 7.07 part-time, there will be a continued focus on enhancing the community’s quality of life and safety, and a continued funding of infrastructure
master plans including the Harbor & Beaches Master Plan ($4 million) and Facilities Financial Plan ($8.5 million).
The proposed budget across all funds is approximately $365 million, including $27 million of
re-budgeted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) projects. It is important to look at the unrestricted sources which are used to fund expenditures (the beginning fund balance which includes the
prior year’s surplus, revenues, and transfers-in). A deduction is made for restricted revenues (affordable housing, ocean-front encroachment). The uses, at a high level, include operating
expenditures ($208 million) and the transfers out ($25.7 million), and increase to the contingency reserve ($2.2 million) required to maintain the reserve at 25% of operating
expenditures.
Committee Member Collopy inquired regarding the contingency reserve. Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz detailed the calculation utilized to determine the 25%. The
surplus in Fiscal Year 2015-2016 has been re-programmed with a two-year lag, so it is utilized in 2017-2018 and the 2016-2017 surplus is proposed for expenditures in the Fiscal Year 2018-
2019 budget. Proposed use of surplus will be for the Harbor & Beaches Master Plan ($4 million), Neighborhood Enhancement Projects ($1 million), Pensions ($3 million), General
Liability Fund for upcoming claims ($3 million), and Contingency Reserve ($1.5 million).
Committee Member Collopy inquired regarding funding related to payment of future claims. Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz stated the General Fund pays for general liability
claims in two ways, first, via a Department charge, which is recurring, and second, through periodic one-time transfers. Mayor Pro Tem O’Neill provided input related to transfers to
Internal Service Funds. Discussion ensued regarding costs related to liability claims. It was determined that some of the Fiscal Year 2016-2017 surplus is proposed to be a one-time
transfer to the General Liability fund to bolster claims-related reserves.
Committee Member Collopy affirmed Policy F-5 states the surplus will be used “50/50” to pay down liabilities and inquired whether there is flexibility within the policy to utilize the entire
surplus to pay liabilities. Mayor Pro Tem O’Neill responded there was flexibility depending on circumstances and they can be waived or modified, and the reserve policy dictates the
percentage of the budget which must be held in reserve. The slide related to use of the Fiscal Year surplus is always presented to the City Council as they make the final determination for
allocation of surplus funds.
Finance Committee Meeting Minutes April 12, 2018
Page 3 of 12
Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz stated the policy allows flexibility to consider and address reserve deficiencies before allocating the remaining surplus on a “50/50” basis.
Discussion ensued related to the declaration of surplus funds and how/when they would or could be allocated.
Committee Member Gorczyca noted the budget is constructed to maintain an underestimation
of revenues. She understood the “50/50” distribution was 50% allocated to infrastructure and the remainder going toward pensions. City Manager Kiff stated the surplus is typically used
toward long-term obligations, which could include a variety of items, such as, but not limited to, general liability, compensated absences, pensions, and debt.
Chair Dixon read an excerpt from Council Policy F-5.
Discussion ensued related to the use of surplus funds. Committee Member Collopy stated his
understanding of the Council Policy F-5 is that if the surplus is not otherwise distributed, then the “50/50” distribution would apply. Further discussion ensued as to how staff was able to
determine the City had $8.8 million of discretionary funds to pay toward the City’s unfunded pension liability.
City Manager Kiff stated the use of $3 million from the Fiscal Year 2016-2017 surplus allows
the City to get to $8.8 million towards the unfunded pension liability. It would be $5.8 if not for the $3 million from surplus. The surplus is allowing the higher discretionary payment.
Alternatively, the City would have to trim the budget in another area to make the payment.
Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz noted that the Finance Committee should focus less on discretionary payments and more on the total payment toward unfunded liability. The
minimum payment will continue to creep upwards unless the City takes proactive steps to keep the minimum payment from growing as scheduled.
Chair Dixon stated the benefits of having the surplus available and continuing the extra
payments toward the unfunded liability. Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz wants to achieve a level payment so that inevitably $34-$35 million per year should cover the City’s
obligation so that pension contribution does not continue increasing every year, assuming no large market losses. The change in the amortization policy allows the City to avoid having to
take extraordinary measures related to the unfunded liability. Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz stated, in the future, new losses will be amortized over a twenty-year period on a
level-dollar basis.
Committee Member Gorczyca inquired whether the method the City utilizes to prepare the budget creates an annual surplus by underestimating revenues, staffing vacancies, and areas
where maintenance can be assigned as projects in other years. She understood the City is using $3 million in surplus to pay toward the unfunded liability. Finance Director/Treasurer
Matusiewicz confirmed this was accurate.
Budget Manager Giangrande stated the surplus generated in the current year is carried forward and allocated in the following budget year (a two-year cycle).
Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz reviewed the General Fund Revenues including
growth and improvements over prior years. There are good prospects for growth with the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT), although there will be competition from neighboring cities. He
reviewed various hotels coming on-line in the area, which will impact inventories available for generation of TOT in Newport Beach. Discussion ensued regarding revenues generated
through TOT and other hospitality/tourism improvement districts.
Finance Committee Meeting Minutes April 12, 2018
Page 4 of 12
Committee Member Collopy inquired whether there was any desire by the City to pursue raising
the TOT. Chair Dixon noted that even though the TOT does not typically impact residents directly, in her opinion there is no desire in the community to raise taxes.
Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz stated there was a drop in Intergovernmental funds
related to Medicare reimbursements of paramedic transfers. Contributions from other sources, such as from “Friends of the Library,” are not immediately programmed into the budget. He
continued to review other General Fund expenditures, including reductions made in the City Council and City Manager’s budgets. Total operating expenditures are only projected to go up
$1.5%, however, bargaining unit contracts in flux have not been included. To mitigate the lack of a specific budget for bargaining unit contracts, he did not reduce the budget for anticipated
position vacancies and related salary savings.
Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz detailed the General Fund Transfers that include the Capital Improvement Program, Facilities Financing Plan, and Facility Maintenance Plan, which
has been underfunded by approximately $500,000 per year. He recommended raising the contribution to the Facility Maintenance Plan when feasible
Committee Member Tucker inquired whether certain facilities are behind in their maintenance
upkeep. Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz stated the Facility Maintenance Plan is an inventory related to maintenance required at various facilities. Chair Dixon inquired whether
there are cutbacks in maintenance. Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz stated that the cutbacks are not affecting maintenance today; however, the plan accommodates upcoming
maintenance matters, such as replacing HVAC systems and other major building maintenance.
Public Works Finance Administrative Manager Jamie Copeland noted as long as there was not a long-term maintenance deficit created by deferring maintenance projects for consecutive
years, the Facilities Financial Plan is adequate for long-term planning purposes.
Committee Member Tucker stated there is a difference for him between funding aesthetic improvements and funding deeper level maintenance matters that could create financial
liabilities.
Committee Member Gorczyca inquired whether the City has the flexibility to utilize surplus funds toward infrastructure maintenance. Staff confirmed the funds could be utilized for this
purpose, as the City Council determines each year the final utilization of the surplus funding.
Council Member Muldoon left the room at 3:40 p.m. to recuse himself from discussion on the 800-megahertz emergency communications topic.
City Manager Kiff spoke regarding the proprietary standards and funding for (megahertz)
infrastructure.
Chair Dixon inquired regarding the small-cell program and inquired as to the continued relevance of the 800-megahertz system. City Manager Kiff noted the County runs the Motorola
hand-held radio program, which is utilized in extreme emergency/urgent situations to communicate for public safety purposes.
Council Member Muldoon returned to the room and meeting at 3:42 p.m. after being notified
that the discussion of the megahertz topic had concluded.
Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz detailed the Department charges for general liability, workers compensation, and compensated absences; which are in place to smooth variations
in each Department’s annual expenditures. Committee Member Collopy inquired regarding the nature of general liability expenses and Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz responded
that the increase in the amount of set-aside funds for liability is based upon actuarial review of
Finance Committee Meeting Minutes April 12, 2018
Page 5 of 12
actual claims. There are two fundamental reasons the number has increased, one being higher
claims experience and second, the charge-back to Departments for the cost of the insurance itself. Discussion ensued regarding the increase in worker’s compensation, which is slightly
below the recommended rate suggested by the actuary. He explained presumptive public safety liability as related to worker’s compensation; however, he noted the City has more time
to address worker’s compensation funding at this time. He also stated the City funding goal is to achieve a 75% confidence level that there will be sufficient funds on hand to pay out future
claims incurred through the current operating period.
Chair Dixon inquired if there was interest in subcommittee to discuss insurance costs. Committee Member Collopy requested clarification at the next meeting relative to the increase
in costs related to general liability and insurance. Discussion ensued among staff and the Committee regarding the funding level and increase in payments related to insurance and
liability coverage. Staff confirmed the funding of the general liability and insurance accounts has been low. They are recommending a larger contribution in the proposed budget, which will
result in a steadier annual funding rate.
Committee Member Gorczyca inquired regarding the amount the City is paying toward their Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) related costs. Finance Director/Treasurer
Matusiewicz stated the City has ten years remaining to pay off the unfunded liability at a conservative discount rate of 6.5%. The current methodology of asset smoothing is based on
an actuarial value of assets compared to market value of assets and he is making a recommendation that future valuations utilize direct smoothing asset smoothing based on the
market value of assets. Committee Member Gorczyca’s understanding was the City was at less than, or just at, a 40% funding status. There were other cities, such as Huntington Beach,
who are paying down their unfunded OPEB liability as a higher priority than paying down pensions.
Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz stated there are two components to the unfunded
OPEB liability. One is a direct obligation and the other is an implied subsidy. Committee Member Gorczyca inquired as to when the new GASB requirements for OPEB would
commence. Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz responded the new GASB 75 would be effective for fiscal year ended 2017-18.
Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz detailed the information related to pension funding.
The City initiated a “fresh start,” and during the 2014-2015 Fiscal Year, he received direction to make an additional discretionary payment in that year as if the Fresh Start was already
effective. After the “fresh start,” the City’s payment went from $14 million per year to $21 million. Currently, the City is paying more because it shortened its amortization schedule under
20 years. After Fiscal Year 2018-2019 there will be approximately 16 years remaining to pay-off the unfunded liability.
Chair Dixon inquired as to the total discretionary payments made toward the unfunded pension
liability. Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz stated that a fresh start was similar to a refinancing to a shorter amortization period and the required minimum payment was increased
accordingly. The City is paying approximately $20 more than would be required to under the former amortization schedule. This effort is getting the City to a responsible repayment level.
Chair Dixon stated and Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz confirmed that there are 16
more years of remaining payment time left. Chair Dixon stated most cities are not as aggressive as Newport Beach in addressing their unfunded pension liability and the City is in a good
position. She also referenced the new Public Employees' Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) rules will more adequately cover new and future employee pension obligations. Finance
Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz stated there are opportunities to early implement legacy amortization schedules to a twenty-year, level-dollar amortization schedule but this decision
would likely be brought back for the Finance Committee’s review in the fall of this year.
Finance Committee Meeting Minutes April 12, 2018
Page 6 of 12
Committee Member Collopy inquired why the City would not elect to continue with the extra discretionary payment and reduce the amortization schedule. Finance Director/Treasurer
Matusiewicz stated he would like to increase the unfunded liability payment. Committee Member Collopy stated he is in favor of continuing to pay down the unfunded liability as quickly
as possible.
City Manager Kiff stated the determination for the continuation of discretionary payments and the requisite amount requires an annual balancing of budget priorities by the City Council.
Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz stated they will re-evaluate the discretionary payments
again next year; however, he would like to get to a unfunded pension liability payment up to $35 million per her should be sufficient to stay on track to fully amortize the existing liability
within 16 years. Chair Dixon noted that the City should continue to accept the pay-down of the unfunded liability as part of the annual budget process. Committee Member Tucker is hopeful
the market will assist the City by increasing the amount of interest, which would be available to pay-down the pension liability. Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz noted the more well-
funded the City is, the more volatile the payments will likely be.
Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz discussed proposed staffing included in the Fiscal Year 2018-2019 budget. The total proposed full-time staffing is 726 positions and part-time
staffing equating to 147.86 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions. He discussed how some positions were eliminated and other positions were added, resulting in an overall net increase
of 1 full-time equivalent position.
City Manager Kiff stated it has become harder for the City to justify the hiring of contract staff. The regulations are so challenging and CalPERS is getting very strict about cities hiring
contractors and treating them as employees. Hiring an employee under PEPRA is less expensive, at least preliminary, instead of a contractor. It does grow the employee staffing
numbers, but he can show savings as compared to hiring contract staff. It will be a challenging conversation for the City Council and community, as it appears to be more financially viable to
hire employees rather than contractors. Discussion ensued regarding the City and School District’s partnership and cost-sharing on school safety personnel.
Committee Member Tucker inquired as to how many employees of the 726 were hired under
the new PEPRA rules. The information will be provided at the next meeting.
Committee Member Collopy inquired as to the City Council bargaining unit discussion and how the City knows that 138 sworn officers is the right complement of staff for a City of Newport
Beach’s size and economic structure. City Manager Kiff stated he relies on the expertise of the Police Chief to ensure the City and its residents are appropriately protected. It is more of an art
than a science; however, the Police Chief makes the professional recommendation on the staffing and structure appropriate to keep the City safe. City Manager Kiff stated the City added
officers in preparation for the Newport Coast annexation.
Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz stated staff noted a recurring savings trend throughout various Department accounts in consecutive years, and those recurring savings were
eliminated from the current proposed budget. City Manager Kiff stated arguably it is more disciplined to hold back savings that Departments have traditionally not spent over consecutive
years, and allow them to justify additional expenditures, as needed.
Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz displayed the various increases and decreases of significance in each Department’s budget.
Chair Dixon inquired regarding the Fire Marshal position. City Manager Kiff stated there will be
a formal presentation to the City Council at a future date related to this issue. Committee
Finance Committee Meeting Minutes April 12, 2018
Page 7 of 12
Member Gorczyca inquired whether there could be options for sharing a Fire Marshal with
another jurisdiction. Assistant City Manager Jacobs stated the options were discussed with various jurisdictions; however, due to current workloads, a sharing opportunity could not be
accommodated at this time. City Manager Kiff stated that the City has exhaustively reviewed partnership and cost-sharing opportunities with other jurisdictions.
Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz stated there are certain proposed part-time Fiscal
Specialist employee positions who will be net revenue generators. Discussion ensued related to the Fire Department’s new program where lifeguards can respond in the evenings, resulting
in a cost savings. Discussion also ensued relative to various Departmental and program requests.
City Manager Kiff stated water is getting more expensive but it comes with fees. More people
are damaging street lights due to texting. The City has an old piping system, which carries the City’s water, which are asbestos based, and require strict supervision during replacement and
disposal of the replaced equipment. The old landfill by Newport Coast is still in existence.
Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz detailed the revenue offset for the two new police officer position, which were recommended. Chair Dixon confirmed the new positions would be
motorcycle officers. City Manager Kiff noted there were part-time investigators, usually retired, who have broken “cold-case” investigations, and the Police Chief feels this is an opportunity to
increase moral in the Department. He described the memorialization of the “cold-case” closures within the Police Department building.
City Manager Kiff spoke regarding various Police Department equipment costs, including items,
which are utilized to address opioid overdoses.
Council Member Muldoon left the room at 4:27 p.m. to recuse himself from discussion on the assessment district topic.
City Manager Kiff stated the City was exploring the management of the City’s assessment
districts in-house, which may allow for revenue off-sets. Edison is applying costly administrative overhead to their undergrounding projects and the City may be able to manage
the assessments more cost-effectively.
City Manager Kiff detailed how the City may provide management of the City’s assessment districts. Staff will return to the City Council with a break out session detailing the feasibility of
the program.
Council Member Muldoon returned to the room and meeting at 4:28 p.m., being notified that the discussion of the assessment district topic had concluded.
Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz detailed the after-school Recreation Department
program enhancement, which staff noted they will report back as to the amount of revenue offset. He displayed a slide that detailed three years of staffing comparisons,
including full and part time positions.
Chair Dixon stated staffing has been relatively flat and the budget has increased in revenues. Discussion ensued related to various facility improvements and program enhancements.
Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz mentioned a number of bargaining unit contracts are
ending, and the City has not set-aside funding in the proposed budget related to that process. The proposed budget also does not include reductions relative to vacant positions. Committee
Member Tucker inquired whether the City serves as its own labor negotiator. City Manager Kiff stated the entire City Council is involved in the labor negotiation process, although they do
Finance Committee Meeting Minutes April 12, 2018
Page 8 of 12
designate a subcommittee specifically for labor negotiations. In addition, the City Council votes
to approve a contract with a professional negotiator who operates in a sub-contracted capacity.
Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz noted all displayed Department program enhancements are included in the proposed budget numbers. There are projects that warrant
additional City Council discussion and they will be listed as items which the City Council can elect to approve and will be an augmentation to the budget as proposed currently. City Manager
Kiff detailed an outstanding matter relative to Police Department operations involving the appropriate staffing to supervise females who are being held in custody. A potential solution
could involve three civilian “records-type” officers who can also supervise when a female is in custody. Appropriate considerations regarding personnel rules and job descriptions will also
need to be reviewed.
Council Member O’Neill noted there was a settlement in the issue; however, there was no “winner” or “loser” in the case referenced by the City Manager.
City Manager Kiff proposed an upcoming City Council meeting schedule, which would include
review of key budget issues such as pensions, Public Works items, and the female custody officer matter. He stated the review would take place over two meetings and could be noticed
as joint meetings of the City Council and Finance Committee. He inquired if the Finance Committee members would entertain the joint meetings on May 8 and May 22 and potentially
cancel the scheduled May 10 meeting.
Discussion ensued regarding various meeting dates and Finance Committee member schedules. The Finance Committee members reached consensus their budget
recommendation to the City Council should occur at a separate meeting of the Finance Committee, not at a joint meeting.
The Finance Committee agreed upon the following schedule:
May 10, 2018 – Finance Committee meeting
May 22, 2018 – Joint Meeting City Council/Finance Committee May 24, 2018 – Finance Committee meeting to approve budget recommendation.
Deputy Director/Finance Montano displayed the Socrata system and its functionality in
allowing for budget review. Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz stated an individual can review the budget by expense group, such as unfunded liabilities, and further
drill down to see the Department impact on each expense group. The software allows for a granular level of review.
Committee Member Collopy inquired as to how many pages or slides are available in the
Socrata System. Deputy Director/Finance Montano noted the number of pages is not tracked as the software is a dynamic relational database, which pulls information and displays
data from the main database sources as determined by the individual user of the system.
Chair Dixon opened public comments. Noting there were no members of the public who elected to speak on this item, Chair Dixon closed public comments.
There was no further action taken on this item.
B. INTERNAL CONTROLS
Summary: Staff will prepare a brief presentation summarizing of internal and external review of internal
control efforts Recommended Action:
Receive and file.
Finance Committee Meeting Minutes April 12, 2018
Page 9 of 12
Deputy Director/Finance Montano displayed a PowerPoint Presentation entitled the “Finance Department Internal Control Review Roadmap”. Slides included Internal Control Cycles Under
Review, Wire Transfer Procedures to Test, and the new Fraud, Waste, or Abuse Administrative Policy.
Deputy Director Montano stated internal control is reviewed during the annual audit process,
however, since there have been changes and the implementation of the new ERP, it was a good opportunity to do a deeper review of internal controls. They are reviewing resource inflows
and outflows. Staff, over the last nine months, has completed review of petty cash procedures and cash handling procedures. They are currently in the process of reviewing wire transfer
procedures. They are doing outreach with other Departments to ensure consistency.
Committee Member Collopy inquired regarding check signing and check preparation procedures. Deputy Director Montano noted the distinction between the two procedures. There
are procedures currently in place which have not been yet reviewed, however are scheduled to be reviewed as part of the internal control review process. The items listed in green on the
PowerPoint slide have been reviewed. The wire transfer procedures review included hiring the current external auditor to test the procedures relative to questions staff has developed.
Accounting Manager Virany stated controls are in place so no individual has the sole ability to authorize wire transfers.
Deputy Director Montano noted cities are now adopting Fraud, Waste, and Abuse policies and
staff has crafted a draft administrative policy with the assistance of a professional consultant firm, which includes an anonymous external fraud, waste, and abuse hotline. These policies
are becoming standard best practice in the field. There is a flow and contingency process by which complaints are structured and reviewed. The outside firm flows the complaint to the
appropriate party depending on where the potential fraud, waste, or abuse is occurring.
Committee Member Collopy stated the internal control department in his company reports directly to the Board of Directors, and they have a very significant role within the organization
for oversight on internal controls. He stated it is almost a virtual Department.
Chair Dixon opened public comments.
Jim Mosher inquired whether the City’s Administrative Policies are available for public review. Deputy Director Montano responded the policies are available on the City’s intranet however
are not posted on the City’s external-facing website. The Administrative Policies can be obtained through a public records request.
Noting there were no further members of the public who elected to speak on this item, Chair
Dixon closed public comments.
There was no further action taken on this item.
C. RESERVE POLICY SUBCOMMITTEE UPDATE Summary:
Staff and or Subcommittee members will provide the Finance Committee a brief update on the status of the Risk-Based Reserve Study.
Recommended Action: Receive and file.
Committee Member Collopy stated he asked for this item to be added to the agenda. Staff
spent quite a bit of time, along with the consultant, to present a scientific study. It is on schedule to have it as a tool for the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 budget. He is anxious to see the results of
the study and how the results will be utilized by the City. The consultants are outstanding
Finance Committee Meeting Minutes April 12, 2018
Page 10 of 12
statisticians and it will be interesting how the recommendations will be implemented, although
he stated he is of the opinion the City is under no obligation to adopt the recommendations.
Committee Member Gorczyca believes the recommendations will come through lighter on the insurance side, as that is not the consultant’s area of particular expertise. She stated the review
will likely result in recommendations relative to cash, insurance, and debt strategies. She believes it would be a good idea for the Finance Committee to review the draft results prior to
any final report issued by the consultant.
Committee Member Collopy noted the review of the study could take up an entire meeting of the Finance Committee. Committee Member Gorczyca stated the reserve policy is important
to the City and warrants review, whether it is an in-person meeting or over the telephone. Committee Member Collopy states that the April deadline for report-out on this matter is not as
important to the City as maintaining the budget schedule. He would prefer to have a report back to the Finance Committee in June.
Chair Dixon suggested the June 14, 2018, meeting be reserved for policy discussions.
Discussion ensued as to the preferred method of how to evaluate the reserve study results.
Committee Member Tucker suggested to reserve the meeting of June 14, 2018, as a tentative date to review the draft report from GFOA relative to the reserve policy. Chair Dixon inquired
whether the Finance Committee can obtain a copy of the draft policy as quickly as it is available for review. Committee Member Gorczyca stated is was important everyone is up to speed
before final recommendations are made. It was targeted that staff would provide a draft report as early as thirty days prior to the meeting, approximately May 1, where the final results will be
presented.
Chair Dixon opened public comments. Noting there were no members of the public who elected to speak on this item, Chair Dixon closed public comments.
There was no further action taken on this item.
D. BUDGET AMENDMENTS
Summary: Receive and file a staff report on the budget amendments for the prior quarter. Recommended Action: Receive and file.
Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz stated most of the amendments presented have
already been approved by the City Council. He did mention the close-out of the Marina Park proceeds and described the process by which the money is accumulated in the Facilities
Financial Plan fund. When a particular project is embarked upon, the City Council approves the estimated project amount along with contingency funds, and the allocation is transferred
into a particular project fund. The remaining funds, after project close-out, are transferred back to the Facilities Financial Plan fund.
Chair Dixon opened public comments. Noting there were no individuals who elected to speak
on this item, Chair Dixon closed public comments.
There was no further action taken on this item.
E. WORK PLAN REVIEW Summary:
Staff will review with the Committee the agenda topics scheduled for the remainder of the calendar year.
Recommended Action:
Finance Committee Meeting Minutes April 12, 2018
Page 11 of 12
Receive and file.
Chair Dixon inquired as to the status of the Long-Term Financial Planning process. Deputy
Director/Finance Montano reported the City purchased a new system for financial planning. Staff is waiting for the current Fiscal Year 2018-2019 budget to settle so that numbers can be
input into the new system. The system should be ready for presentation to the Finance Committee by the May 10 meeting.
Chair Dixon inquired whether Committee Member Gorczyca received responses to her
previous questions regarding CalPERS liquidity and the City Hall BABs reimbursement.
Committee Member Gorczyca felt it was important to review CalPERS liquidity, especially because of the current state of the stock market, and whether those questions would be
appropriately directed to John Bartel. Discussion ensued whether Mr. Bartel would be the appropriate person to report on the City’s cash flows and the information should come from
CalPERS.
Committee Member Gorczyca’s stated her intent was to ensure the City is reviewing liquidity in light that expenditures are currently exceeding revenues. Finance Director/Treasurer
Matusiewicz reported CalPERS has produced two cash flow schedules; however, the information may not be available at regular intervals.
Committee Member Tucker is not sure what the Finance Committee can do with the liquidity
information as it relates to CalPERS investments. It is something the City Council should know as part of their game plan to address future planning needs.
Chair Dixon inquired whether the CalPERS financial and fiscal sustainability plans can be
forwarded to the Finance Committee. Finance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz stated information was recently provided to the Finance Committee. Discussion ensued regarding the
type of information updates that will be provided to the Finance Committee regarding CalPERS liquidity, as are available.
Chair Dixon opened public comments. Noting there were no individuals who elected to speak
on this item, Chair Dixon closed public comments.
There was no further action taken on this item.
VI. FINANCE COMMITTEE ANNOUNCEMENTS ON MATTERS WHICH MEMBERS WOULD LIKE PLACED ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION, ACTION OR REPORT (NON-
DISCUSSION ITEM)
Committee Member Collopy expressed concern regarding the timing of review of the reserve study with Council. He suggested the June 14, 2018, meeting for review and noted a recommendation
should come from the Finance Committee.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
The Finance Committee adjourned at 5:17 p.m. to the next regular meeting of the Finance Committee.
Filed with these minutes are copies of all materials distributed at the meeting.
The agenda for the Regular Meeting was posted on April 9, 2018, at 1:47 p.m., in the binder and
on the City Hall Electronic Board located in the entrance of the Council Chambers at 100 Civic Center Drive.
Finance Committee Meeting Minutes April 12, 2018
Page 12 of 12
Attest:
___________________________________ _____________________ Diane Dixon, Chair Date
Finance Committee
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
FINANCE COMMITTEE AGENDA -Final
100 Civic Center Drive -Crystal Cove Conference Room, Bay 20
Thursday, May 10, 2018 -3:00 PM
Finance Committee Members:
Diane Dixon, Chair/ Council Member
Will O'Neill, Mayor Pro Tern
Kevin Muldoon, Council Member
William Collopy, Committee Member
Patti Gorczyca, Committee Member
Joe Stapleton, Committee Member
Larry Tucker, Committee Member
Staff Members:
Dave Kiff, City Manager
Carol Jacobs, Assistant City Manager
Dan Matusiewicz, Finance Director/ Treasurer
Steve Montano, Deputy Director, Finance
Marlene Burns, Administrative Specialist to the Finance Director
The Finance Committee meeting is subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act. Among other things, the Brown Act requires that
the Finance Committee agenda be posted at least seventy-two (72) hours in advance of each regular meeting and that
the public be allowed to comment on agenda items before the Committee and items not on the agenda but are within
the subject matter jurisdiction of the Finance Committee. The Chair may limit public comments to a reasonable amount
of time, generally three (3) minutes per person.
The City of Newport Beach's goal is to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an
attendee or a participant at this meeting, you will need special assistance beyond what is nonnally provided, we will
attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact Dan Matusiewicz, Finance Director, at least
forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is
feasible at (949) 644-3123 or dmatusiewicz@newportbeachca.gov.
NOTICE REGARDING PRESENTATIONS REQUIRING USE OF CITY EQUIPMENT
Any presentation requiring the use of the City of Newport Beach's equipment must be submitted to the Finance
Department 24 hours prior to the scheduled meeting.
I.CALL MEETING TO ORDER
II.ROLL CALL
Ill. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Public comments are invited on agenda and non-agenda items generally considered to be
within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Finance Committee. Speakers must limit comments
to three (3) minutes. Before speaking, we invite, but do not require, you to state your name for
the record. The Finance Committee has the discretion to extend or shorten the speakers' time
limit on agenda or non-agenda items, provided the time limit adjustment is applied equally to all
speakers. As a courtesy, please tum cell phones off or set them in the silent mode.
IV.CONSENT CALENDAR
Proposed changes by Committee Member Patti Gorczyca Item No. 4A1Draft Minutes of April 12, 2018
Correspondence
May 10, 2018
Finance Committee Meeting Minutes April 12, 2018
Finance Directorrrreasurer Matusiewicz stated the policy allows flexibility to consider andaddress reserve deficiencies before allocating the remaining surplus on a "50/50" basis.Discussion ensued related to the declaration of surpl�� funds and how/when they would or could be allocated. \'tpuf�
Committee Member Gorczyca noted the b1/4get is constructed to maintain an underestimation of revenues. She understood the "50/50"��tribution was 50% allocated to infrastructure and the remainder going toward pensions. City Manager Kiff stated the surplus is typically used toward long-term obligations, which could include a variety of items, such as, but not limited to, general liability, compensated absences, pensions, and debt.
Chair Dixon read an excerpt from Council Policy F-5.
Discussion ensued related to the use of surplus funds. Committee Member Collopy stated his understanding of the Council Policy F-5 is that if the surplus is not otherwise distributed, then the "50/50" distribution would apply. Further discussion ensued as to how staff was able to determine the City had $8.8 million of discretionary funds to pay toward the City's unfunded pension liability.
City Manager Kiff stated the use of $3 mifl:ion from the Fiscal Year 2016-2017 surplus allows the City to get to $8.8 million towards the unfunded pension liability. It would be $5.8 if not for the $3 million from surplus,. The surplus is alJorwing the higher discretionary payment. Alternatively, the City would have to trim the budget in another area to make the payment.
Finance Directorrrreasurer Matusiewicz noted that the Finance Committee should focus less on discretionary payments and more on the total payment toward unfunded liability. The minimum payment will continue to creep upwards unless the City takes proactive steps to keep the minimum payment from growing as scheduled.
Chair Dixon. stated the benefits of having the surplus available and continuing the extra payments toward the unfunded liability. Finance Directorrrreasurer Matusiewicz wants to achieve a level payment so that inevitably $34-$35 million per year should cover the City's obligation. so that pension contribution does not continue increasing every year, assuming no large market losses. The change in the amortization policy allows the City to avoid having to take extraordinary measures related to the unfunded liability. Finance Directorrrreasurer Matusiewicz stated, in the future, new losses will be amortized over a twenty-year period on a level-dollar basis. Jc,.(�� byCommittee Member Gorczyca inqui.Ld whether the method the City utilizes to prepare the •budget creates an a�urplus by!u�derestimating revenues, staffing vacancies, and ™s
. o..V\tl� \VI� wi:lefe maintenance 'assigned 3& pcojecti in other years. She understood the City is(YI using $3 miffion in surplus to pay toward the unfunded liability. Finance DirectorrrreasurerMatusiewicz confirmed this was accurate.
Budget Manager Giangrande stated the surplus generated in the current year is carried forward and allocated in the following budget year (a two-year cycle).
Finance Directorrrreasurer Matusiewicz reviewed the General Fund Revenues including growth and improvements over prior years. There are good prospects for growth with the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT), although there will be competition from neighboring cities. He reviewed various hotels coming on-line in the area, which will impact inventories available for generation of TOT in Newport Beach. Discussion ensued regarding revenues generated through TOT and other hospitality/tourism improvement districts.
Page 3 of 12
Finance Committee Meeting Minutes April 12, 2018
statisticians and it will be interesting how the recommendations will be implemented, although he stated he is of the opinion the City is under no obligation to adopt the recommendations.
Committee Member Gorczyca believes the recommendations will ceA'le tl'IFe1:Jgl=l lightifon the
insurance side, as that is not the consultant's area of particular expertise. She stated the review will likely result in recommendations relative to cash, insurance, and debt strategies. She believes it would be�a good igeo for the Finance Committee to review the draft results prior to
any final report issu d_ by the consultant. I Mpor-ftl//lf
Committee Member Collopy noted the review of the study could take up an entire meeting of the Finance Committee. Committee Member Gorczyca stated the reserve policy is important to the City and warrants review, whether it is an in-person meeting or over the telephone. Committee Member Collopy states that the April deadline for report-out on this matter is not as important to the City as maintaining the budget schedule. He would prefer to have a report back to the Finance Committee in June.
Chair Dixon suggested the June 14, 2018, meeting be resei:ved for policy discussions.
Discussion ensued as to the preferredc-method of how to evaluate the reserve study results. Committee Member Tucker suggested to: reserve the meeting of June 14, 2018, as a tentative date to review the draft report from GFOA relative to the reserve policy. Chair Dixon inquired whether the Finance Committee can obtain a copy of the draft policy as quickly as it is available for review. Committee Member Gorczyca stated
�
· . . important everyone is up to speed before final recommendations are made. It was ; , d that staff would provide a draft report as early as thirty days prior to the meeting, approx,.. ly �ay 1, where the final results will be presented. t+ (£,
Chair Dixon opened public comments. Noting there were no members of the public who elected to speak on this item, Chair Dixon closed pubfic comments.
There was no further action taken on this item.
D.BUDGET AMENDMENTS
Summary:Receive and nle a staff report on the budg.et amendments for the prior quarter.
Recommended Action:Receive and file.
Finance DirectorfTreasurer Matusiewicz stated most of the amendments presented havealready been approved by the City Council. He did mention the close-out of the Marina Parkproceeds and described the process by which the money is accumulated in the FacilitiesFinancial Plan fund. When a particular project is embarked upon, the City Council approvesthe estimated project amount along with contingency funds, and the allocation is transferredinto a particular project fund. The remaining funds, after project close-out, are transferred backto the Facilities Financial Plan fund.
Chair Dixon opened public comments. Noting there were no individuals who elected to speakon this item, Chair Dixon closed public comments.
There was no further action taken on this item.
E.WORK PLAN REVIEW
Summary:Staff will review with the Committee the agenda topics scheduled for the remainder of thecalendar year.
Recommended Action:
Page 10 of 12
Receive and file.
Finance Committee Meeting MinutesApril 12, 2018
Chair Dixon inquired as to the status of the Long-Term Financial Planning process. DeputyDirector/Finance Montano reported the City purchased a new system for financial planning.Staff is waiting for the current Fiscal Year 2018-2019 budget to settle so that numbers can beinput into the new system. The system should be ready for presentation to the FinanceCommittee by the May 10 meeting.
Chair Dixon inquired whether Committee Member Gorczyca received responses to herprevious questions regarding CalPERS liquidity and the City Hall BABp reimbursement. ..,L_ I t1 t; fL l ri.5:1 Committee Member Gorczyca felt it was important to •r,:;,_ew CalPERS liquidity, especiallybesaaso -ef the current state of the stock market, anchvhether those questions would beappropriately directed to John Bartel. Discussion ensued whether Mr. Bartel would be the appropriate�rson to report on the City's cash flows aRd the information s:hrn lid come fmm.GalPERS-. , --........,
Gommitte�-ea·s stated �s to e1,�e-C1ty is rev1ewiAg liqYi9it¥in light fhe1t exp9ndit1,1res are cYrrently exceeding revel'ltleS. inance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz reported CalPERS has produced two cash flow schedules; however, the information may not be available at regular intervals.
Committee Member Tucker is not sure what the Finance Committee can do with the liquidityinformation as it relates to CalPERS investments. It is something the City Council should knowas part of their game plan to address future planning needs.
Chair Dixon inquired whether the CalPERS financial and fiscal sustainability plans can beforwarded to the Finance Comm.ittee. Fraance Director/Treasurer Matusiewicz statedinformation was recently provided to-the Finance Committee. Discussion ensued regarding thetype of information updates that will be provided to the Finance Committee regarding CalPERSliquidity, as are available.
Chair Dixon opened public comments. Noting there were no individuals who elected to speakon this item, Chair Dixon closed public comments.
There was no further action taken on this item.
VI.FINANCE COMMITTEE ANNOUNCEMENTS ON MATTERS WHICH MEMBERS WOULD LIKE
PLACED ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION, ACTION OR REPORT (NONDISCUSSION ITEM)
Committee Member Collopy expressed concern regarding the timing of review of the reserve studywith Council. He suggested the June 14, 2018, meeting for review and noted a recommendationshould come from the Rnance Committee.
VII.ADJOURNMENT
The Finance Committee adjourned at 5:17 p.m. to the next regular meeting of the FinanceCommittee.
Filed with these minutes are copies of all materials distributed at the meeting.
The agenda for the Regular Meeting was posted on April 9, 2018, at 1 :47 p.m., in the binder andon the City Hall Electronic Board located in the entrance of the Council Chambers at 100 CivicCenter Drive.
Page 11 of 12
1
Burns, Marlene
From:Dixon, Diane
Sent:Thursday, May 10, 2018 10:57 AM
To:Burns, Marlene
Subject:RE: Emailing: 4A1 CORRESPONDENCE DRAFT MINUTES 041218
Hi Marlene
A few typos :
Page 5 $20 Million (next to last paragraph)
Page 6: third paragraph $35 million per YEAR
-----Original Message----- From: Burns, Marlene
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 10:23 AM Subject: Emailing: 4A1 CORRESPONDENCE DRAFT MINUTES 041218
Good morning,
Attached, please find changes to the April 12, 2018, draft minutes as proposed by Committee Member Gorczyca. Copies
will be available at the 3:00 p.m. meeting this afternoon.
Thank you,
Marlene Burns Administrative Specialist to the Finance Director, Finance Department, City of Newport Beach
T: 949-644-3127 | F: 949-644-3339 | E: mburns@newportbeachca.gov | W: www.newportbeachca.gov
Your message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments:
4A1 CORRESPONDENCE DRAFT MINUTES 041218
Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent sending or receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your e-mail security settings to determine how attachments are handled.
Proposed changes by Chair Diane Dixon Item No. 4A2
Draft Minutes of April 12, 2018
Correspondence
May 10, 2018
RE
V
E
N
U
E
CO
M
P
A
R
I
S
O
N
/
V
A
R
I
A
N
C
E
AL
L
FU
N
D
S
/
A
L
L
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
S
4/
1
1
/
2
0
1
8
Fu
n
d
Ti
t
l
e
GE
N
E
R
A
L
FU
N
D
De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
Ti
t
l
e
(A
l
l
)
Re
f
R
o
w
La
b
e
l
s
20
1
7
Ac
t
u
a
l
s
2
0
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
2
0
1
9
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
Va
r
i
a
n
c
e
20
1
9
V
20
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
% Ch
a
n
g
e
1
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
TA
X
96
,
9
6
4
,
0
6
0
10
0
,
1
4
6
,
4
4
9
10
4
,
3
6
6
,
6
5
3
4,
2
2
0
,
2
0
4
0
2
4
1
1
0
0
0
‐PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
TA
X
CU
R
R
E
N
T
SE
C
U
R
E
D
78
,
5
0
1
,
0
4
2
83
,
3
7
9
,
4
8
1
87
,
5
4
8
,
4
5
5
4,
1
6
8
,
9
7
4
0
2% CPI increase plus favorable housing market conditions
3
4
1
1
0
0
5
‐PR
O
P
TA
X
IN
LI
E
U
OF
VL
F
8,
6
5
5
,
2
6
2
9,
2
2
2
,
4
5
6
9,
6
8
3
,
5
7
9
46
1
,
1
2
3
0
4
4
1
1
0
1
0
‐PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
TA
X
CU
R
UN
S
E
C
U
R
E
D
2,
5
3
1
,
5
1
0
2,
5
5
9
,
8
6
0
2,
5
5
9
,
8
6
0
‐
‐
5
4
1
1
0
1
5
‐PR
I
O
R
YE
A
R
PE
N
L
T
Y
/
I
N
T
R
E
S
T
42
9
,
2
8
2
41
7
,
4
5
6
41
7
,
4
5
6
‐
‐
6
4
1
1
0
2
0
‐SU
P
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
A
L
TA
X
E
S
2,
3
7
3
,
4
6
6
2,
6
9
0
,
2
5
5
2,
2
1
6
,
3
3
9
(4
7
3
,
9
1
6
)
(0
)
7
4
1
1
0
2
5
‐PR
O
P
TA
X
HO
M
E
O
W
N
E
R
S
EX
E
M
P
T
50
2
,
0
8
4
49
7
,
0
6
3
49
2
,
0
9
2
(4
,
9
7
1
)
(0
)
8
4
1
1
0
2
6
‐PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
TA
X
TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
2,
6
1
3
,
8
8
0
‐
‐
‐
9
4
1
1
0
3
0
‐RD
A
RE
S
I
D
U
A
L
1,
3
4
6
,
6
7
8
1,
3
7
9
,
8
7
8
1,
4
4
8
,
8
7
2
68
,
9
9
4
0
10
4
1
1
0
4
0
‐RD
A
PA
S
S
TH
R
O
U
G
H
10
,
8
5
6
‐
‐
‐
11
SA
L
E
S
TA
X
33
,
7
0
2
,
8
9
5
34
,
4
9
8
,
0
0
7
34
,
6
7
8
,
2
8
2
18
0
,
2
7
5
0
12
4
1
2
0
0
5
‐SA
L
E
S
AN
D
US
E
TA
X
34
,
3
5
6
,
1
7
6
35
,
1
4
2
,
9
2
1
35
,
3
2
3
,
1
9
6
18
0
,
2
7
5
0
13
4
1
2
0
1
0
‐SA
L
E
S
TA
X
RE
C
O
V
E
R
Y
HD
L
(8
0
,
7
1
1
)
(5
7
,
0
0
0
)
(5
7
,
0
0
0
)
‐
‐
14
4
1
2
0
1
5
‐SA
L
E
TA
X
SH
A
R
I
N
G
AG
R
M
E
N
T
(5
7
2
,
5
7
0
)
(5
8
7
,
9
1
4
)
(5
8
7
,
9
1
4
)
‐
‐
15
TR
A
N
S
I
E
N
T
OC
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
TA
X
26
,
6
3
5
,
8
0
8
25
,
1
4
2
,
2
6
1
26
,
9
2
3
,
5
4
8
1,
7
8
1
,
2
8
7
0
16
4
1
3
0
0
0
‐UT
O
T
RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
CV
B
PA
Y
M
E
N
T
S
(5
7
2
,
8
6
3
)
(6
3
0
,
1
5
0
)
(6
8
0
,
5
6
2
)
(5
0
,
4
1
2
)
0
17
4
1
3
0
0
5
‐UT
O
T
RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
TA
X
3,
1
7
9
,
0
3
8
3,
4
9
6
,
9
4
1
3,
8
1
6
,
6
9
7
31
9
,
7
5
6
0
Increase to residential UTOT due to additional Revenue staffing
18
4
1
3
0
1
0
‐UT
O
T
HO
T
E
L
TA
X
24
,
0
2
9
,
6
3
4
22
,
2
7
5
,
4
7
0
23
,
7
8
7
,
4
1
3
1,
5
1
1
,
9
4
3
0
Addition of the Lido House to Hotel UTOT and additional room inventory back online.
19
OT
H
E
R
TA
X
E
S
8,
5
9
1
,
5
8
8
11
,
3
1
6
,
9
5
6
11
,
9
5
5
,
0
0
0
63
8
,
0
4
4
0
20
4
1
4
0
0
0
‐AU
D
I
T
RE
C
O
V
E
R
Y
79
,
0
5
8
5,
0
0
0
12
5
,
0
0
0
12
0
,
0
0
0
24
Increase due to add'l Revenue staffing
21
4
1
4
0
0
5
‐UT
I
L
I
T
Y
FR
A
N
C
H
I
S
E
TA
X
1,
0
0
6
,
6
1
9
1,
0
6
3
,
3
8
4
1,
0
1
5
,
0
0
0
(4
8
,
3
8
4
)
(0
)
22
4
1
4
0
1
5
‐CA
B
L
E
FR
A
N
C
H
I
S
E
1,
8
5
1
,
4
3
5
1,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
1,
8
5
0
,
0
0
0
50
,
0
0
0
0
23
4
1
4
0
2
5
‐SO
L
I
D
WA
S
T
E
FR
A
N
C
H
I
S
E
TA
X
1,
1
6
7
,
9
5
2
1,
1
6
4
,
3
8
6
1,
2
1
0
,
0
0
0
45
,
6
1
4
0
24
4
1
4
0
3
0
‐BU
S
I
N
E
S
S
LI
C
E
N
S
E
TA
X
4,
1
4
9
,
0
1
6
4,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
4,
4
2
0
,
0
0
0
42
0
,
0
0
0
0
Increase due to add'l Revenue staffing
25
4
1
4
0
3
5
‐MA
R
I
N
E
CH
A
R
T
E
R
TA
X
33
7
,
5
0
9
28
4
,
1
8
6
33
5
,
0
0
0
50
,
8
1
4
0
26
4
1
4
0
4
0
‐PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
TA
X
TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
S
‐
3,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
3,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
27
SE
R
V
I
C
E
FE
E
S
& CH
A
R
G
19
,
8
8
0
,
9
9
6
20
,
0
9
9
,
9
9
1
20
,
1
3
9
,
3
2
8
39
,
3
3
7
0
28
5
2
1
0
0
0
‐RE
G
U
L
A
T
O
R
Y
PE
R
M
I
T
FE
E
S
20
,
7
0
0
18
,
0
0
0
18
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
29
5
2
1
0
1
0
‐TB
I
D
AD
M
I
N
FE
E
20
,
8
8
5
5,
0
0
0
5,
0
0
0
‐
‐
30
5
2
1
0
1
5
‐ZO
N
I
N
G
& SU
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
FE
E
S
25
6
,
5
3
9
27
0
,
0
0
0
23
6
,
5
7
5
(3
3
,
4
2
5
)
(0
)
31
5
2
1
0
2
0
‐WI
T
N
E
S
S
FE
E
S
/
S
U
B
P
O
E
N
A
40
,
7
7
2
36
,
8
9
6
36
,
7
3
8
(1
5
8
)
(0
)
32
5
2
1
0
2
5
‐PL
A
N
CH
E
C
K
I
N
G
FE
E
S
2,
7
8
5
,
0
2
0
2,
7
1
1
,
2
0
5
2,
8
2
7
,
5
4
7
11
6
,
3
4
2
0
33
5
2
1
0
2
6
‐PL
A
N
CH
E
C
K
FE
E
S
VC
A
29
,
2
4
0
50
,
0
0
0
10
,
2
5
0
(3
9
,
7
5
0
)
(1
)
34
5
2
1
0
2
7
‐PL
A
N
CH
E
C
K
FE
E
S
JA
S
9,
9
1
3
50
,
0
0
0
10
,
2
5
0
(3
9
,
7
5
0
)
(1
)
35
5
2
1
0
3
0
‐ZO
N
I
N
G
& PL
A
N
RE
V
I
E
W
FE
E
S
30
1
,
6
2
4
31
0
,
0
0
0
25
6
,
2
5
0
(5
3
,
7
5
0
)
(0
)
36
5
2
1
0
3
5
‐PL
A
N
CH
E
C
K
FE
E
S
GR
A
D
I
N
G
12
6
,
9
7
9
11
4
,
4
0
9
12
3
,
3
1
1
8,
9
0
2
0
1 (R
E
V
E
N
U
E
)
\\
c
n
b
.
l
c
l
\
d
a
t
a
\
U
s
e
r
s
\
F
I
N
\
S
h
a
r
e
d
\
A
d
m
i
n
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
\
R
E
P
O
R
T
S
\
2
0
1
8
\
0
5
1
0
1
8
\
F
Y
18
to
19
Bu
d
g
e
t
Variances for Fin Committee (00000005) FINAL
It
e
m
N
o
.
5
A
1
Fi
n
a
n
c
e
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
B
u
d
g
e
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
Ma
y
1
0
,
2
0
1
8
Re
f
R
o
w
La
b
e
l
s
2
0
1
7
Ac
t
u
a
l
s
2
0
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
2
0
1
9
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
Va
r
i
a
n
c
e
20
1
9
V
20
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
% Ch
a
n
g
e
37
5
2
1
0
4
0
‐RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
L
BU
I
L
D
N
G
RE
C
R
D
S
2
5
4
,
5
1
0
25
3
,
7
8
2
26
9
,
3
3
2
15
,
5
5
0
0
38
5
2
1
0
4
4
‐RE
A
L
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
FE
E
1
,
4
7
5
‐
‐
‐
39
5
2
1
0
4
5
‐AS
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
DI
S
T
R
I
C
T
AD
M
I
N
1
8
,
0
0
0
20
,
0
0
0
20
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
40
5
2
1
0
5
0
‐SP
E
C
IN
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
SV
C
FE
E
S
6
0
,
2
1
4
55
,
8
0
2
68
,
2
4
0
12
,
4
3
8
0
41
5
2
1
0
6
0
‐WA
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
ST
RE
F
U
S
E
BI
N
1
,
6
2
3
1,
9
0
0
3,
6
0
0
1,
7
0
0
1
42
5
2
1
0
6
5
‐EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
SV
C
FE
E
S
4
8
8
,
9
0
4
38
5
,
0
0
0
38
5
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
43
5
2
1
0
7
5
‐CU
R
B
CU
T
FE
E
S
1
3
1
,
5
0
4
13
2
,
5
0
0
12
5
,
0
0
0
(7
,
5
0
0
)
(0
)
44
5
2
1
0
8
0
‐EN
E
R
G
Y
CO
M
P
L
I
A
N
C
E
RE
V
I
E
W
1
4
7
,
1
0
6
15
3
,
8
0
3
14
4
,
2
5
9
(9
,
5
4
4
)
(0
)
45
5
2
1
0
8
5
‐DI
S
A
B
L
E
D
AC
C
E
S
S
RE
V
I
E
W
6
5
,
2
2
4
69
,
5
9
2
67
,
0
9
7
(2
,
4
9
5
)
(0
)
46
5
2
1
0
9
0
‐CO
P
I
E
S
/
P
L
A
N
S
/
S
P
E
C
S
/
M
I
S
C
3
5
,
2
9
1
45
,
5
4
2
35
,
0
7
9
(1
0
,
4
6
3
)
(0
)
47
5
2
1
1
0
5
‐PL
A
N
CH
E
C
K
OV
E
R
T
I
M
E
4
8
,
9
9
5
39
,
5
6
1
67
,
8
4
9
28
,
2
8
8
1
48
5
2
1
1
1
0
‐MA
R
I
N
E
PR
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
ED
U
C
A
T
I
O
N
6
,
4
8
3
36
,
0
0
0
7,
0
0
0
(2
9
,
0
0
0
)
(1
)
49
5
2
1
1
1
5
‐FI
N
A
L
TR
A
C
T
MA
P
3
,
1
9
8
3,
0
0
0
4,
0
0
0
1,
0
0
0
0
50
5
2
1
1
2
0
‐FI
N
A
L
PA
R
C
E
L
MA
P
CH
C
K
I
N
G
5
1
,
2
9
7
40
,
0
0
0
25
,
0
0
0
(1
5
,
0
0
0
)
(0
)
51
5
2
1
1
2
5
‐LO
T
LI
N
E
AD
J
U
S
T
M
E
N
T
7
,
4
5
3
10
,
0
0
0
12
,
0
0
0
2,
0
0
0
0
52
5
2
1
1
3
0
‐ST
R
E
E
T
EA
S
E
M
E
N
T
/
V
A
C
A
T
I
O
N
1
,
0
0
2
1,
0
0
0
1,
0
0
0
‐
‐
53
5
2
1
1
3
5
‐EN
C
R
O
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
/
E
N
G
AG
R
E
E
M
N
T
3
9
,
2
6
0
42
,
5
0
0
31
,
0
0
0
(1
1
,
5
0
0
)
(0
)
54
5
2
1
1
4
0
‐FI
R
E
SA
F
E
T
Y
SV
C
S
MA
R
I
N
E
OP
S
4
5
6
2,
5
0
0
2,
5
0
0
‐
‐
55
5
2
1
1
4
5
‐JR
LI
F
E
G
U
A
R
D
SE
R
V
I
C
E
FE
E
S
1
,
0
2
3
,
5
6
9
1,
0
2
0
,
0
0
0
1,
0
2
0
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
56
5
2
1
1
5
5
‐CE
R
T
FE
E
S
2
,
9
9
0
2,
0
0
0
2,
0
0
0
‐
‐
57
5
2
1
1
6
0
‐PO
L
I
C
E
EM
E
R
G
E
N
C
Y
RE
S
P
O
N
S
E
9
0
,
9
0
3
12
0
,
0
0
0
12
0
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
58
5
2
1
1
6
5
‐PO
L
I
C
E
SV
C
NU
S
I
A
N
C
E
RS
P
N
S
6
,
1
4
7
5,
0
0
0
6,
0
0
0
1,
0
0
0
0
59
5
2
1
1
6
6
‐LU
G
O
Fe
e
s
‐
‐
(1
,
0
0
0
)
(1
,
0
0
0
)
60
5
2
1
1
7
0
‐PO
L
I
C
E
FI
N
G
E
R
P
R
I
N
T
SV
C
9
,
0
6
0
8,
0
0
0
9,
0
0
0
1,
0
0
0
0
61
5
2
1
1
7
5
‐PO
L
I
C
E
MI
S
C
E
L
L
A
N
E
O
U
S
SV
C
2
1
7
,
3
7
2
20
0
,
0
0
0
20
0
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
62
5
2
1
1
8
0
‐IM
P
O
U
N
D
RE
L
E
A
S
E
FE
E
S
7
2
,
1
0
5
50
,
0
0
0
65
,
0
0
0
15
,
0
0
0
0
63
5
2
1
1
8
5
‐PO
L
I
C
E
JA
I
L
BO
O
K
I
N
G
FE
E
S
3
4
1
,
4
3
9
30
0
,
0
0
0
30
0
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
64
5
2
1
1
9
0
‐PO
L
I
C
E
MA
S
S
A
G
E
PE
R
M
I
T
FE
E
5
0
2
1,
0
0
0
20
0
(8
0
0
)
(1
)
65
5
2
1
1
9
5
‐PL
A
N
CH
E
C
K
FE
E
S
GR
A
D
I
N
G
/
O
U
T
B
‐
‐
12
5
,
0
0
0
12
5
,
0
0
0
66
5
2
1
1
9
6
‐PL
A
N
CH
E
C
K
FE
E
S
GR
A
D
I
N
G
/
O
U
T
P
‐
‐
25
,
0
0
0
25
,
0
0
0
67
5
2
1
2
1
0
‐FI
R
E
AN
N
U
A
L
& SP
C
PM
T
S
1
3
6
,
2
6
8
17
5
,
0
0
0
24
7
,
5
6
5
72
,
5
6
5
0
68
5
2
1
2
1
5
‐FI
R
E
PL
A
N
CH
E
C
K
1
4
6
,
5
9
0
14
9
,
6
5
0
15
6
,
3
0
1
6,
6
5
1
0
69
5
2
1
2
2
0
‐FI
R
E
CO
N
S
T
IN
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
9
9
,
3
6
5
11
4
,
8
0
0
99
,
0
9
2
(1
5
,
7
0
8
)
(0
)
70
5
2
1
2
2
5
‐HA
Z
A
R
D
O
U
S
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
DI
S
C
L
1
5
6
‐
‐
‐
71
5
2
1
2
3
0
‐LO
U
D
UN
R
U
L
Y
GA
T
H
E
R
I
N
G
OR
D
2
7
6
5,
0
0
0
6,
0
0
0
1,
0
0
0
0
72
5
2
1
2
3
1
‐DA
C
Fi
n
e
s
‐
‐
(1
,
0
0
0
)
(1
,
0
0
0
)
73
5
2
1
2
4
0
‐PA
R
A
M
E
D
I
C
SU
B
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
FE
E
2
9
2
,
3
2
8
31
8
,
7
5
0
31
8
,
7
5
0
‐
‐
74
5
2
1
2
4
5
‐PA
R
A
M
E
D
I
C
SE
R
V
I
C
E
FE
E
3
,
5
6
3
,
7
2
8
3,
5
7
4
,
0
0
0
3,
8
3
5
,
7
4
7
26
1
,
7
4
7
0
Wittman prediction private insurance co. to pay higher % of billed charges
75
5
2
1
2
6
0
‐AL
A
R
M
AP
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
FE
E
S
1
1
,
0
8
3
9,
0
0
0
9,
0
0
0
‐
‐
76
5
2
1
2
6
5
‐AL
A
R
M
PE
R
M
I
T
RE
N
E
W
A
L
FE
E
S
1
4
2
,
9
0
2
13
0
,
0
0
0
13
0
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
77
5
2
1
2
7
0
‐AL
A
R
M
MO
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G
FE
E
S
5
7
,
0
6
7
60
,
0
0
0
60
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
78
5
2
1
3
1
0
‐RE
C
Y
C
L
I
N
G
FE
E
S
9
7
1
,
5
2
8
80
0
,
0
0
0
97
0
,
0
0
0
17
0
,
0
0
0
0
79
5
2
1
3
1
5
‐RE
F
U
S
E
FR
A
N
C
H
I
S
E
AP
P
FE
E
‐
‐
2,
4
0
0
2,
4
0
0
80
5
2
1
3
5
0
‐AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
WA
T
E
R
1
,
4
8
7
,
3
4
1
1,
4
8
7
,
3
4
1
1,
4
6
4
,
6
7
1
(2
2
,
6
7
0
)
(0
)
2 (R
E
V
E
N
U
E
)
\
\
c
n
b
.
l
c
l
\
d
a
t
a
\
U
s
e
r
s
\
F
I
N
\
S
h
a
r
e
d
\
A
d
m
i
n
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
\
R
E
P
O
R
T
S
\
2
0
1
8
\
0
5
1
0
1
8
\
F
Y
18
to
19
Bu
d
g
e
t
Variances for Fin Committee (00000005) FINAL
Re
f
R
o
w
La
b
e
l
s
2
0
1
7
Ac
t
u
a
l
s
2
0
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
2
0
1
9
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
Va
r
i
a
n
c
e
20
1
9
V
20
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
% Ch
a
n
g
e
81
5
2
1
3
5
5
‐AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
SE
W
E
R
3
7
1
,
7
4
8
37
1
,
7
4
8
41
2
,
2
0
2
40
,
4
5
4
0
Based on fee analysis
82
5
2
1
3
6
0
‐WA
T
E
R
ES
T
A
B
L
I
S
H
M
E
N
T
FE
E
1
8
3
,
3
4
6
18
3
,
4
4
6
15
8
,
5
0
0
(2
4
,
9
4
6
)
(0
)
Based on fee analysis
83
5
2
1
3
6
5
‐PA
S
S
P
O
R
T
EX
E
C
U
T
I
O
N
FE
E
2
0
,
6
5
5
16
,
0
0
0
25
,
0
0
0
9,
0
0
0
1
84
5
2
1
3
7
0
‐PA
S
S
P
O
R
T
PH
O
T
O
S
5
,
4
1
5
5,
0
0
0
8,
0
0
0
3,
0
0
0
1
85
5
2
1
3
7
5
‐PL
A
N
N
I
N
G
ST
A
F
F
FE
E
S
1
4
8
,
4
1
4
15
0
,
0
0
0
13
8
,
3
7
5
(1
1
,
6
2
5
)
(0
)
86
5
2
1
3
8
0
‐CI
T
Y
ST
A
F
F
SE
R
V
I
C
E
FE
E
2
6
,
1
5
1
30
,
8
0
0
30
,
2
2
0
(5
8
0
)
(0
)
87
5
2
1
3
8
5
‐SL
E
S
F
CI
T
Y
ST
A
F
F
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
1
5
8
,
8
5
3
16
5
,
0
0
0
16
5
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
88
5
2
1
3
9
5
‐OC
A
T
T
CI
T
Y
ST
A
F
F
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
1
1
4
,
7
0
5
‐
‐
‐
89
5
2
1
4
0
0
‐OT
S
CI
T
Y
ST
A
F
F
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
2
4
9
,
4
7
6
35
7
,
4
4
4
75
,
0
0
0
(2
8
2
,
4
4
4
)
(1
)
One quarter budgeted only; will go to Council when new grant rec'd
90
5
2
1
4
0
5
‐AQ
U
A
T
I
C
S
PR
O
G
R
A
M
S
1
1
7
,
7
2
9
12
0
,
0
0
0
12
0
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
91
5
2
1
4
1
0
‐YO
U
T
H
DA
Y
CA
M
P
S
1
6
8
,
8
0
1
15
5
,
0
0
0
16
5
,
0
0
0
10
,
0
0
0
0
92
5
2
1
4
1
5
‐PR
E
S
C
H
O
O
L
CA
M
P
S
1
5
,
5
4
1
12
,
0
0
0
30
,
5
0
0
18
,
5
0
0
2
93
5
2
1
4
2
0
‐FI
E
L
D
LI
G
H
T
FE
E
S
3
7
,
3
8
8
30
,
0
0
0
34
,
0
0
0
4,
0
0
0
0
94
5
2
1
4
2
5
‐FE
E
BA
S
E
D
CL
A
S
S
E
S
1
,
4
3
0
,
3
0
4
1,
6
6
4
,
5
0
0
1,
3
1
2
,
0
0
0
(3
5
2
,
5
0
0
)
(0
)
Corresponding exp decrease
95
5
2
1
4
2
6
‐TI
D
E
L
A
N
D
S
FE
E
BA
S
E
D
CL
A
S
S
E
S
6
7
,
3
6
9
75
,
0
0
0
32
7
,
0
0
0
25
2
,
0
0
0
3
Corresponding exp increase
96
5
2
1
4
2
7
‐TI
D
E
L
A
N
D
S
BO
A
T
I
N
G
PR
O
G
R
M
CL
A
S
S
1
2
2
,
3
9
0
29
5
,
6
5
1
29
5
,
6
5
1
‐
‐
97
5
2
1
4
3
0
‐CY
C
CL
A
S
S
E
S
1
1
3
,
3
7
5
‐
‐
‐
98
5
2
1
4
3
5
‐TE
N
N
I
S
CL
A
S
S
E
S
5
7
,
5
4
2
70
,
0
0
0
60
,
0
0
0
(1
0
,
0
0
0
)
(0
)
99
5
2
1
4
4
5
‐SP
E
C
I
A
L
EV
E
N
T
PE
R
M
I
T
FE
E
S
1
6
5
,
1
5
4
11
5
,
0
0
0
11
5
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
10
0
5
2
1
4
5
0
‐SP
E
C
I
A
L
EV
E
N
T
S
1
9
,
1
8
7
19
,
3
0
0
22
,
0
0
0
2,
7
0
0
0
10
1
5
2
1
4
5
5
‐SU
R
F
I
N
G
CL
A
S
S
E
S
6
2
5
,
7
8
8
73
3
,
5
0
0
60
0
,
0
0
0
(1
3
3
,
5
0
0
)
(0
)
Corresponding exp decrease
10
2
5
2
1
4
6
0
‐DR
O
P
IN
ME
M
B
E
R
S
H
I
P
S
7
,
6
3
4
6,
5
0
0
5,
5
0
0
(1
,
0
0
0
)
(0
)
10
3
5
2
1
4
6
5
‐SA
I
L
I
N
G
CL
A
S
S
E
S
7
4
0
‐
‐
‐
10
4
5
2
1
4
7
0
‐FI
T
N
E
S
S
ME
M
B
E
R
FE
E
S
2
3
1
,
8
8
0
24
0
,
0
0
0
23
0
,
0
0
0
(1
0
,
0
0
0
)
(0
)
10
5
5
2
1
4
7
5
‐AD
U
L
T
SP
O
R
T
S
3
0
3
,
4
3
1
34
6
,
3
2
0
34
6
,
3
2
0
‐
‐
10
6
5
2
1
4
8
0
‐TI
N
Y
TO
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
5
4
,
5
9
3
62
,
0
0
0
62
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
10
7
5
2
1
4
8
5
‐YO
U
T
H
SP
O
R
T
S
8
9
,
1
7
0
91
,
2
5
0
91
,
2
5
0
‐
‐
10
8
5
2
1
4
9
0
‐YO
U
T
H
AF
T
E
R
SC
H
O
O
L
PR
O
G
1
9
3
,
7
0
0
20
5
,
0
0
0
21
3
,
0
0
0
8,
0
0
0
0
10
9
5
2
1
4
9
5
‐AR
T
S
CO
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
RE
V
4
,
0
2
7
‐
‐
‐
11
0
5
2
1
5
0
0
‐PE
R
S
O
N
A
L
TR
A
I
N
E
R
FE
E
S
2
7
2
,
1
7
4
30
2
,
0
0
0
27
5
,
0
0
0
(2
7
,
0
0
0
)
(0
)
11
1
5
2
1
5
5
5
‐WA
T
E
R
QU
A
L
I
T
Y
IN
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
8
,
4
8
9
30
,
0
0
0
20
,
0
0
0
(1
0
,
0
0
0
)
(0
)
11
2
5
2
1
6
0
0
‐VI
D
E
O
P
L
A
N
RE
N
T
A
L
1
2
,
3
0
5
14
,
0
0
0
11
,
0
0
0
(3
,
0
0
0
)
(0
)
11
3
5
2
1
6
0
5
‐RE
N
T
A
L
BO
O
K
RE
V
E
N
U
E
4
,
5
4
3
3,
0
0
0
‐
(3
,
0
0
0
)
(1
)
Program discontinued
11
4
5
2
1
6
1
0
‐RU
N
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
7
,
4
4
5
7,
0
0
0
9,
0
0
0
2,
0
0
0
0
11
5
5
2
1
6
2
0
‐HE
L
I
C
O
P
T
E
R
PR
O
G
RE
I
M
B
MI
S
C
8
8
3,
0
0
0
3,
0
0
0
‐
‐
11
6
5
2
1
6
2
5
‐SC
H
O
O
L
RE
S
O
U
R
C
E
OF
F
I
C
E
R
2
1
7
,
8
9
0
22
0
,
0
0
0
22
0
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
11
7
5
2
1
6
3
0
‐CI
T
A
T
I
O
N
SI
G
N
O
F
F
FE
E
3
,
9
9
0
2,
0
0
0
2,
0
0
0
‐
‐
11
8
5
2
1
6
3
5
‐PD
RA
N
G
E
US
A
G
E
FE
E
5
,
2
2
0
6,
5
0
0
6,
5
0
0
‐
‐
11
9
5
2
1
6
4
0
‐OA
S
I
S
CL
A
S
S
FE
E
S
5
4
5
,
2
6
4
55
0
,
0
0
0
55
0
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
12
0
5
2
1
6
4
5
‐EL
E
C
T
I
O
N
FE
E
S
6
‐
‐
‐
12
1
5
2
1
6
5
0
‐LS
S
‐
AF
T
E
R
HO
U
R
S
IN
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
6
,
1
6
7
25
,
0
0
0
3,
0
0
7
(2
1
,
9
9
3
)
(1
)
12
2
5
2
1
6
6
0
‐LI
T
E
R
A
C
Y
EV
E
N
T
S
1
4
,
0
5
4
‐
‐
‐
12
3
5
2
1
6
6
5
‐OT
H
E
R
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
FE
E
S
4
,
5
6
4
4,
5
0
0
4,
5
0
0
‐
‐
12
4
5
2
1
6
7
0
‐AC
AN
I
M
A
L
IM
P
O
U
N
D
FE
E
5
,
2
7
2
8,
0
0
0
5,
0
0
0
(3
,
0
0
0
)
(0
)
12
5
5
2
1
6
7
1
‐AC
BO
A
R
D
I
N
G
FE
E
4
,
3
5
1
2,
0
0
0
3,
0
0
0
1,
0
0
0
1
3 (R
E
V
E
N
U
E
)
\
\
c
n
b
.
l
c
l
\
d
a
t
a
\
U
s
e
r
s
\
F
I
N
\
S
h
a
r
e
d
\
A
d
m
i
n
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
\
R
E
P
O
R
T
S
\
2
0
1
8
\
0
5
1
0
1
8
\
F
Y
18
to
19
Bu
d
g
e
t
Variances for Fin Committee (00000005) FINAL
Re
f
R
o
w
La
b
e
l
s
2
0
1
7
Ac
t
u
a
l
s
2
0
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
2
0
1
9
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
Va
r
i
a
n
c
e
20
1
9
V
20
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
% Ch
a
n
g
e
12
6
5
2
1
6
7
2
‐AC
ME
D
I
C
A
L
FE
E
6
5
4
40
0
40
0
‐
‐
12
7
5
2
1
6
7
3
‐AC
OW
N
E
R
RE
L
I
N
Q
U
I
S
H
M
E
N
T
FE
E
8
1
3
60
0
1,
0
0
0
40
0
1
12
8
5
2
1
6
7
4
‐AC
NO
N
AL
T
E
R
FE
E
1
,
1
4
9
1,
5
0
0
1,
5
0
0
‐
‐
12
9
5
2
1
6
7
5
‐AC
AD
O
P
T
I
O
N
FE
E
2
5
,
4
8
0
12
,
5
0
0
20
,
0
0
0
7,
5
0
0
1
13
0
5
2
1
6
8
0
‐OC
RE
C
O
R
D
I
N
G
FE
E
1
9
2
‐
30
0
30
0
13
1
5
2
1
6
8
5
‐EX
A
M
PR
O
C
T
O
R
FE
E
S
‐
‐
1,
0
0
0
1,
0
0
0
13
2
DO
N
A
T
I
O
N
S
& CO
N
T
R
I
B
U
T
I
O
N
S
1
4
8
,
8
5
5
14
0
,
7
7
5
13
1
,
5
0
0
(9
,
2
7
5
)
(0
)
13
3
5
6
1
0
0
0
‐MC
F
A
D
D
E
N
SQ
(C
E
N
T
N
I
A
L
)
2
7
,
7
5
0
‐
‐
‐
13
4
5
6
1
0
0
5
‐PR
V
T
DO
N
A
T
I
O
N
/
C
O
N
T
R
I
B
U
T
N
S
5
5
,
7
8
0
40
,
7
7
5
30
,
0
0
0
(1
0
,
7
7
5
)
(0
)
13
5
5
6
1
0
0
6
‐DO
N
A
T
I
O
N
S
‐
HO
M
E
L
E
S
S
AS
S
I
S
2
0
0
‐
‐
‐
13
6
5
6
1
0
1
0
‐FR
I
E
N
D
S
OF
OA
S
I
S
DO
N
A
T
N
S
5
2
,
8
7
5
61
,
5
0
0
61
,
5
0
0
‐
‐
13
7
5
6
1
0
2
5
‐DO
N
A
T
N
S
/
P
E
N
I
N
S
U
L
A
FE
S
T
V
L
1
2
,
2
5
0
3,
5
0
0
5,
0
0
0
1,
5
0
0
0
13
8
5
6
1
0
3
5
‐BA
Y
V
I
E
W
LA
N
D
I
N
G
AG
M
T
‐
35
,
0
0
0
35
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
13
9
FI
N
E
S
& PE
N
A
L
T
I
E
S
3
,
7
1
2
,
2
9
6
3,
8
7
0
,
9
0
0
3,
8
8
1
,
9
0
7
11
,
0
0
7
0
14
0
5
3
1
0
1
0
‐CO
L
L
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
RE
C
MA
N
A
G
E
R
9
7
‐
‐
‐
14
1
5
3
1
0
2
0
‐FA
L
S
E
AL
A
R
M
S
FI
N
E
S
3
4
,
8
3
1
35
,
0
0
0
30
,
0
0
0
(5
,
0
0
0
)
(0
)
14
2
5
3
1
0
3
0
‐FA
L
S
E
AL
A
R
M
S
PE
N
A
L
T
I
E
S
9
0
,
2
2
4
85
,
0
0
0
85
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
14
3
5
3
1
0
3
5
‐LI
B
R
A
R
Y
FI
N
E
S
1
5
1
,
2
3
6
14
0
,
0
0
0
14
0
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
14
4
5
3
1
0
4
5
‐RE
G
U
L
A
R
PA
R
K
I
N
G
FI
N
E
S
2
,
8
9
3
,
3
4
1
3,
0
4
4
,
3
0
0
3,
1
2
5
,
9
0
0
81
,
6
0
0
0
14
5
5
3
1
0
4
6
‐PA
R
K
I
N
G
CI
T
E
CO
L
L
E
C
T
I
O
N
SV
C
‐
‐
(1
1
5
,
9
0
0
)
(1
1
5
,
9
0
0
)
Prior years we abated revenue for collection services
14
6
5
3
1
0
5
0
‐GE
N
E
R
A
L
FI
N
E
S
2
8
,
3
1
3
10
,
0
0
0
10
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
14
7
5
3
1
0
5
5
‐MO
T
O
R
VE
H
I
C
L
E
FI
N
E
S
2
4
1
,
5
6
5
35
0
,
0
0
0
42
5
,
0
0
0
75
,
0
0
0
0
14
8
5
3
1
0
6
0
‐DE
L
I
N
Q
U
E
N
C
Y
PE
N
A
L
T
Y
1
2
1
,
8
0
4
8,
1
0
0
8,
1
0
0
‐
‐
14
9
5
3
1
0
6
5
‐RE
T
U
R
N
E
D
CH
E
C
K
S
FE
E
S
2
,
5
2
4
1,
5
0
0
1,
5
0
0
‐
‐
15
0
5
3
1
0
7
0
‐AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
CI
T
A
T
I
O
N
FI
N
E
S
1
3
7
,
4
8
4
17
7
,
0
0
0
17
2
,
3
0
7
(4
,
6
9
3
)
(0
)
15
1
5
3
1
0
7
1
‐AD
M
I
N
CI
T
E
CO
L
L
E
C
T
I
O
N
SV
C
FE
E
‐
‐
(2
0
,
0
0
0
)
(2
0
,
0
0
0
)
Prior years we abated revenue for collection services
15
2
5
3
1
1
1
0
‐DI
S
P
O
S
E
D
CA
S
E
S
1
0
,
8
7
7
20
,
0
0
0
20
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
15
3
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
IN
C
O
M
E
9
,
1
5
8
,
1
3
8
9,
2
0
0
,
1
0
7
9,
5
1
2
,
9
4
8
31
2
,
8
4
1
0
15
4
5
5
1
0
0
0
‐OC
E
A
N
F
R
O
N
T
EN
C
R
O
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
2
0
7
,
5
7
9
22
2
,
0
0
0
22
2
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
15
5
5
5
1
0
0
5
‐LI
D
O
FA
R
M
E
R
S
MA
R
K
E
T
3
,
6
4
2
3,
6
0
0
3,
7
0
0
10
0
0
15
6
5
5
1
0
1
0
‐NE
W
P
O
R
T
DU
N
E
S
LE
A
S
E
1
,
8
0
0
1,
8
0
0
1,
8
0
0
‐
‐
15
7
5
5
1
0
2
0
‐BE
A
C
O
N
BA
Y
(S
P
L
I
T
)
1
,
2
9
7
,
5
3
0
1,
3
7
8
,
0
0
0
1,
3
5
1
,
5
0
0
(2
6
,
5
0
0
)
(0
)
15
8
5
5
1
0
2
5
‐TE
L
E
C
O
M
SI
T
E
LI
C
E
N
S
E
FE
E
1
0
0
,
4
6
8
98
,
0
0
0
10
2
,
0
0
0
4,
0
0
0
0
15
9
5
5
1
0
3
0
‐TE
L
E
S
C
O
P
E
FR
A
N
C
H
(S
P
L
I
T
)
1
,
8
1
9
1,
0
6
0
1,
3
2
5
26
5
0
16
0
5
5
1
0
5
0
‐BY
B
SL
I
P
S
(S
P
L
I
T
)
1
,
0
6
2
,
7
6
3
1,
1
3
4
,
2
0
0
1,
1
3
5
,
7
9
0
1,
5
9
0
0
16
1
5
5
1
0
5
1
‐DI
N
G
H
Y
RA
C
K
S
‐
3,
2
0
0
‐
(3
,
2
0
0
)
(1
)
16
2
5
5
1
0
5
5
‐TE
M
P
O
R
A
R
Y
SL
I
P
RE
N
T
A
L
S
3
,
2
0
4
53
0
53
0
‐
‐
16
3
5
5
1
0
6
0
‐BA
S
I
N
MA
R
I
N
E
SH
I
P
(S
P
L
I
T
)
9
8
,
4
7
4
74
,
2
0
0
74
,
2
0
0
‐
‐
16
4
5
5
1
0
6
5
‐BY
B
GA
R
A
G
E
S
(S
P
L
I
T
)
1
7
0
,
1
8
7
68
,
3
7
0
69
,
9
6
0
1,
5
9
0
0
16
5
5
5
1
0
7
5
‐HE
R
I
T
A
G
E
YA
C
H
T
(S
P
L
I
T
)
1
1
,
0
8
9
9,
5
4
0
11
,
6
6
0
2,
1
2
0
0
16
6
5
5
1
0
8
0
‐GA
L
L
E
Y
CA
F
E
(S
P
L
I
T
)
2
7
,
5
3
2
28
,
8
8
5
29
,
1
5
0
26
5
0
16
7
5
5
1
0
8
5
‐BY
B
AP
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
S
(S
P
L
I
T
)
4
9
,
4
3
6
48
,
2
3
0
49
,
2
9
0
1,
0
6
0
0
16
8
5
5
1
0
8
6
‐BY
B
OF
F
I
C
E
S
6
,
5
3
0
20
,
6
7
0
21
,
2
0
0
53
0
0
16
9
5
5
1
1
0
5
‐BA
L
B
O
A
YA
C
H
T
CL
U
B
‐
6,
7
8
8
7,
0
4
0
25
2
0
4 (R
E
V
E
N
U
E
)
\
\
c
n
b
.
l
c
l
\
d
a
t
a
\
U
s
e
r
s
\
F
I
N
\
S
h
a
r
e
d
\
A
d
m
i
n
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
\
R
E
P
O
R
T
S
\
2
0
1
8
\
0
5
1
0
1
8
\
F
Y
18
to
19
Bu
d
g
e
t
Variances for Fin Committee (00000005) FINAL
Re
f
R
o
w
La
b
e
l
s
2
0
1
7
Ac
t
u
a
l
s
2
0
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
2
0
1
9
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
Va
r
i
a
n
c
e
20
1
9
V
20
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
% Ch
a
n
g
e
17
0
5
5
1
1
1
5
‐RE
N
T
A
L
OF
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
1
4
,
5
5
6
3,
6
0
0
‐
(3
,
6
0
0
)
(1
)
17
1
5
5
1
1
2
0
‐WN
C
C
PA
C
I
F
I
C
A
1
7
0
‐
‐
‐
17
2
5
5
1
1
2
1
‐NE
W
P
O
R
T
OU
T
R
I
G
G
E
R
CA
N
O
E
CL
U
B
2
,
5
2
9
2,
4
0
0
2,
4
0
0
‐
‐
17
3
5
5
1
1
2
2
‐CA
L
RE
C
EA
S
E
M
E
N
T
2
0
,
5
2
7
35
,
0
0
0
36
,
0
0
0
1,
0
0
0
0
17
4
5
5
1
1
2
3
‐MC
F
A
D
D
E
N
SQ
U
A
R
E
AT
M
KI
O
S
K
4
4
4
1,
9
2
0
1,
9
2
0
‐
‐
17
5
5
5
1
1
2
5
‐OC
DO
C
K
LE
A
S
E
(S
P
L
I
T
)
9
1
,
9
4
0
63
,
6
0
0
‐
(6
3
,
6
0
0
)
(1
)
17
6
5
5
1
1
3
0
‐LI
D
O
HO
U
S
E
HO
T
E
L
‐
37
,
5
0
0
75
,
0
0
0
37
,
5
0
0
1
17
7
5
5
1
1
3
5
‐BU
S
SH
E
L
T
E
R
S
6
3
,
6
5
4
63
,
0
0
0
31
,
5
0
0
(3
1
,
5
0
0
)
(1
)
17
8
5
5
1
1
4
0
‐CI
V
I
C
CE
N
T
E
R
FO
O
D
SE
R
V
I
C
E
3
0
,
1
1
7
27
,
5
0
0
27
,
5
0
0
‐
‐
17
9
5
5
1
1
4
1
‐CI
V
I
C
CT
R
CR
E
D
I
T
UN
I
O
N
RE
N
T
2
6
,
0
4
4
21
,
0
0
0
21
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
18
0
5
5
1
1
4
5
‐CI
V
I
C
CE
N
T
E
R
CA
T
E
R
I
N
G
5
,
9
9
0
‐
‐
‐
18
1
5
5
1
1
5
1
‐MA
R
I
N
A
PA
R
K
CA
T
E
R
I
N
G
4
,
8
5
0
5,
0
0
0
5,
0
0
0
‐
‐
18
2
5
5
1
1
5
2
‐WE
L
L
S
FA
R
G
O
LE
A
S
E
2
4
,
2
0
6
24
,
0
0
0
25
,
0
0
0
1,
0
0
0
0
18
3
5
5
1
1
5
5
‐BC
R
HA
R
B
O
R
DA
Y
1
1
,
6
4
1
11
,
5
0
0
12
,
1
0
0
60
0
0
18
4
5
5
1
1
6
5
‐FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
RE
N
T
A
L
FE
E
S
7
4
9
,
9
0
5
65
9
,
0
0
0
71
7
,
0
0
0
58
,
0
0
0
0
18
5
5
5
1
1
6
7
‐TI
D
E
L
A
N
D
S
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
RE
N
T
A
L
S
2
0
,
3
4
7
10
,
0
0
0
20
,
0
0
0
10
,
0
0
0
1
18
6
5
5
1
1
7
0
‐YS
C
FI
E
L
D
FE
E
S
9
7
,
0
3
9
84
,
0
0
0
90
,
0
0
0
6,
0
0
0
0
18
7
5
5
1
1
7
5
‐OA
S
I
S
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
FE
E
S
4
0
,
2
9
7
40
,
0
0
0
42
,
0
0
0
2,
0
0
0
0
18
8
5
5
1
1
8
0
‐OA
S
I
S
TR
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
FE
E
S
2
6
,
9
4
4
27
,
0
0
0
30
,
0
0
0
3,
0
0
0
0
18
9
5
5
1
2
1
0
‐CO
R
O
N
A
DE
L
MA
R
CO
N
C
E
S
S
I
O
N
2
6
,
3
4
1
15
,
0
0
0
23
,
0
0
0
8,
0
0
0
1
19
0
5
5
1
2
1
5
‐CI
V
I
C
CN
T
R
CO
M
M
RO
O
M
FE
E
S
7
2
,
5
3
7
50
,
0
0
0
65
,
0
0
0
15
,
0
0
0
0
19
1
5
5
1
2
3
0
‐LI
B
R
A
R
Y
FA
C
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
FE
E
6
3
2
‐
‐
‐
19
2
5
5
1
3
1
0
‐NE
W
P
O
R
T
BL
V
D
2
4
0
,
1
4
0
25
3
,
9
2
6
25
4
,
8
7
0
94
4
0
19
3
5
5
1
3
1
5
‐NE
W
P
O
R
T
BU
S
I
N
E
S
S
3
7
8
,
7
9
9
38
5
,
7
5
3
45
6
,
5
4
1
70
,
7
8
8
0
19
4
5
5
1
3
2
5
‐CO
A
S
T
HI
G
H
W
A
Y
2
6
,
7
6
7
26
,
7
6
9
25
,
7
4
4
(1
,
0
2
5
)
(0
)
19
5
5
5
1
3
3
0
‐LI
D
O
SH
O
P
P
I
N
G
1
4
6
,
8
9
3
12
8
,
6
2
6
16
3
,
6
0
8
34
,
9
8
2
0
19
6
5
5
1
3
3
5
‐NE
W
P
O
R
T
/
B
A
L
B
O
A
BL
V
D
1
4
9
,
1
2
4
17
1
,
6
0
8
15
9
,
8
7
2
(1
1
,
7
3
6
)
(0
)
19
7
5
5
1
3
4
0
‐BA
L
B
O
A
ST
R
I
P
1 MC
F
A
D
D
N
TO
15
1
0
9
,
6
7
3
11
5
,
0
7
9
12
2
,
6
1
5
7,
5
3
6
0
19
8
5
5
1
3
4
5
‐15
T
H
ST
R
E
E
T
1
3
7
,
7
8
1
13
6
,
4
3
0
14
0
,
1
9
6
3,
7
6
6
0
19
9
5
5
1
3
5
0
‐BA
L
B
O
A
ST
R
I
P
2 10
T
H
TO
15
T
H
1
0
4
,
6
2
7
10
0
,
6
9
7
11
3
,
4
8
0
12
,
7
8
3
0
20
0
5
5
1
3
6
5
‐CE
N
T
R
A
L
LO
T
2
9
,
0
6
3
20
,
8
6
3
37
,
2
6
6
16
,
4
0
4
1
20
1
5
5
1
3
7
1
‐MA
R
C
U
S
/
3
2
N
D
ST
R
E
E
T
LO
T
3
8
,
0
7
7
45
,
6
3
3
45
,
9
8
8
35
5
0
20
2
5
5
1
3
8
5
‐CI
T
Y
HA
L
L
2
7
,
6
7
1
27
,
0
7
7
29
,
6
1
8
2,
5
4
1
0
20
3
5
5
1
3
9
0
‐MC
F
A
D
D
E
N
4
4
8
,
9
9
2
49
7
,
9
6
4
52
6
,
8
6
7
28
,
9
0
3
0
20
4
5
5
1
3
9
5
‐SE
A
S
H
O
R
E
LO
T
2
0
3
,
1
2
1
22
9
,
8
0
8
21
0
,
9
9
4
(1
8
,
8
1
4
)
(0
)
20
5
5
5
1
4
1
0
‐CA
N
N
E
R
Y
VI
L
L
A
G
E
LO
T
1
4
,
9
1
6
14
,
4
3
3
15
,
6
7
2
1,
2
3
9
0
20
6
5
5
1
4
1
5
‐CA
N
N
E
R
Y
VI
L
L
A
G
E
A
9
1
,
3
0
8
94
,
2
2
2
10
0
,
4
6
7
6,
2
4
5
0
20
7
5
5
1
4
2
0
‐CA
N
N
E
R
Y
VI
L
L
A
G
E
B
1
9
2
,
5
4
0
21
4
,
5
0
9
20
3
,
7
1
0
(1
0
,
7
9
9
)
(0
)
20
8
5
5
1
4
2
5
‐CA
N
N
E
R
Y
VI
L
L
A
G
E
C
1
6
1
,
7
7
6
18
3
,
7
5
2
16
9
,
6
1
8
(1
4
,
1
3
4
)
(0
)
20
9
5
5
1
4
3
0
‐BA
L
B
O
A
ST
R
I
P
3 10
T
H
TO
AL
V
A
R
D
O
1
0
9
,
7
4
4
89
,
9
9
7
11
4
,
4
1
3
24
,
4
1
6
0
21
0
5
5
1
4
3
5
‐WE
S
T
NE
W
P
O
R
T
49
T
H
TO
LU
G
O
N
I
A
6
4
,
6
3
1
73
,
3
7
5
81
,
2
5
2
7,
8
7
7
0
21
1
5
5
1
4
4
0
‐WE
S
T
NE
W
P
O
R
T
6
2
,
5
2
4
74
,
3
0
4
63
,
4
6
1
(1
0
,
8
4
3
)
(0
)
21
2
5
5
1
4
4
5
‐OV
E
R
/
U
N
D
E
R
VA
R
I
A
N
C
E
S
8
,
3
0
4
‐
‐
‐
21
3
5
5
1
4
4
6
‐MA
R
I
N
A
PA
R
K
‐MA
I
N
LO
T
1
1
5
,
7
4
0
10
1
,
5
7
6
12
5
,
1
2
8
23
,
5
5
2
0
21
4
5
5
1
4
4
7
‐MA
R
I
N
A
PA
R
K
‐
EA
S
T
LO
T
2
3
,
8
2
1
25
,
9
6
2
16
,
8
5
2
(9
,
1
1
0
)
(0
)
21
5
5
5
1
4
4
8
‐MA
R
I
N
A
PA
R
K
‐WE
S
T
LO
T
3
4
,
7
8
5
43
,
7
9
8
45
,
5
4
7
1,
7
4
9
0
5 (R
E
V
E
N
U
E
)
\
\
c
n
b
.
l
c
l
\
d
a
t
a
\
U
s
e
r
s
\
F
I
N
\
S
h
a
r
e
d
\
A
d
m
i
n
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
\
R
E
P
O
R
T
S
\
2
0
1
8
\
0
5
1
0
1
8
\
F
Y
18
to
19
Bu
d
g
e
t
Variances for Fin Committee (00000005) FINAL
Re
f
R
o
w
La
b
e
l
s
2
0
1
7
Ac
t
u
a
l
s
2
0
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
2
0
1
9
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
Va
r
i
a
n
c
e
20
1
9
V
20
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
% Ch
a
n
g
e
21
6
5
5
1
4
4
9
‐MA
R
I
N
A
PA
R
K
‐
BA
L
B
O
A
BL
V
D
1
1
6
‐
‐
‐
21
7
5
5
1
4
5
0
‐IN
LI
E
U
PA
R
K
I
N
G
2
5
,
0
5
0
27
,
7
5
0
25
,
0
5
0
(2
,
7
0
0
)
(0
)
21
8
5
5
1
4
5
5
‐26
T
H
ST
R
E
E
T
PA
R
K
I
N
G
1
0
4
,
1
3
6
87
,
2
3
7
12
5
,
0
7
8
37
,
8
4
1
0
21
9
5
5
1
4
6
0
‐MA
R
I
N
E
R
S
LO
T
1
7
,
1
3
9
32
,
5
5
0
17
,
1
0
6
(1
5
,
4
4
4
)
(0
)
22
0
5
5
1
4
6
5
‐NE
W
P
O
R
T
BL
V
D
LO
T
3
3
,
3
5
2
30
,
8
7
5
43
,
9
0
0
13
,
0
2
5
0
22
1
5
5
1
4
7
0
‐BA
Y
S
I
D
E
CD
M
PA
R
K
I
N
G
LO
T
1
4
,
8
3
5
3,
6
0
0
15
,
2
6
9
11
,
6
6
9
3
22
2
5
5
1
4
7
5
‐DA
H
L
I
A
CD
M
PA
R
K
I
N
G
LO
T
2
3
,
5
9
0
35
,
2
9
3
27
,
1
1
3
(8
,
1
8
0
)
(0
)
22
3
5
5
1
4
8
0
‐CO
A
S
T
HI
G
H
W
A
Y
PA
R
K
I
N
G
1
7
,
4
1
4
15
,
8
8
9
10
,
6
0
8
(5
,
2
8
1
)
(0
)
22
4
5
5
1
4
8
5
‐SU
P
E
R
I
O
R
LO
T
4
7
,
0
0
6
50
,
9
8
0
47
,
5
6
2
(3
,
4
1
8
)
(0
)
22
5
5
5
1
4
9
0
‐32
N
D
ST
R
E
E
T
PA
R
K
I
N
G
4
9
,
2
8
7
44
,
0
4
4
54
,
8
1
1
10
,
7
6
7
0
22
6
5
5
1
5
0
5
‐RE
G
U
L
A
R
PA
R
K
I
N
G
PE
R
M
I
T
S
5
4
9
,
8
1
9
60
0
,
0
0
0
60
0
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
22
7
5
5
1
5
1
0
‐ZO
N
E
#1
NP
T
IS
L
A
N
D
PA
R
K
I
N
G
2
5
6
48
0
35
0
(1
3
0
)
(0
)
22
8
5
5
1
5
1
5
‐ZO
N
E
#1
NP
T
IS
L
A
N
D
GU
E
S
T
7
,
7
9
2
6,
3
0
0
7,
0
0
0
70
0
0
22
9
5
5
1
5
2
0
‐ZO
N
E
#2
NE
W
P
O
R
T
HE
I
G
H
T
S
1
,
1
4
0
3,
8
0
0
1,
5
0
0
(2
,
3
0
0
)
(1
)
23
0
5
5
1
5
2
5
‐ZO
N
E
#3
AR
A
L
I
A
ST
R
E
E
T
3
,
1
1
1
3,
9
0
0
1,
4
0
0
(2
,
5
0
0
)
(1
)
23
1
5
5
1
5
3
0
‐CO
R
O
N
A
DE
L
MA
R
PA
R
K
N
G
LO
T
1
,
2
8
2
,
6
6
0
1,
3
0
7
,
5
1
7
1,
4
0
5
,
6
3
4
98
,
1
1
7
0
23
2
5
5
1
5
3
5
‐PA
R
K
I
N
G
ME
T
E
R
FE
E
S
(
2
8
3
,
8
0
4
)
(3
1
5
,
1
5
8
)
(3
2
1
,
8
0
4
)
(6
,
6
4
6
)
0
23
3
5
5
1
5
3
6
‐PA
Y
BY
CE
L
L
TR
A
N
S
A
C
T
I
O
N
FE
E
(
2
8
,
3
3
9
)
(7
1
,
2
0
5
)
(7
6
,
9
7
3
)
(5
,
7
6
8
)
0
23
4
IN
T
E
R
G
O
V
T
A
L
RE
V
E
N
U
E
S
2
,
2
8
4
,
7
7
5
2,
4
5
0
,
9
3
9
1,
7
5
6
,
0
5
5
(6
9
4
,
8
8
4
)
(0
)
23
5
4
3
1
0
0
0
‐MO
T
O
R
VE
H
I
C
L
E
LI
C
E
N
S
E
FE
E
‐
35
,
0
0
0
35
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
23
6
4
3
1
0
1
5
‐ST
HI
G
H
W
A
Y
MA
I
N
T
FE
E
S
2
9
,
5
4
0
32
,
2
2
5
32
,
2
2
5
‐
‐
23
7
4
3
1
0
2
5
‐PO
L
I
C
E
OF
F
ST
A
N
D
A
R
D
/
T
R
A
I
N
I
N
G
1
0
,
2
2
2
50
,
0
0
0
50
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
23
8
4
3
1
0
3
0
‐OC
PU
B
SA
F
E
T
Y
AU
G
M
E
N
T
A
T
I
O
N
1
,
0
0
5
,
1
5
1
98
0
,
0
0
0
1,
0
2
5
,
0
0
0
45
,
0
0
0
0
23
9
4
3
1
0
3
5
‐ST
A
T
E
MA
N
D
A
T
E
D
CO
S
T
RE
I
M
B
1
6
25
,
0
0
0
‐
(2
5
,
0
0
0
)
(1
)
24
0
4
3
1
0
4
0
‐CO
U
N
T
Y
RN
S
P
OT
3
6
,
3
6
5
50
,
0
0
0
50
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
24
1
4
3
1
0
4
5
‐CO
R
R
E
C
T
I
O
N
TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
RE
I
M
B
1
1
,
6
9
6
6,
3
1
0
4,
7
3
0
(1
,
5
8
0
)
(0
)
24
2
4
3
1
0
6
5
‐DI
S
P
A
T
C
H
TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
RE
I
M
B
3
,
0
0
0
3,
0
0
0
3,
0
0
0
‐
‐
24
3
4
3
1
0
7
0
‐CA
L
I
F
LI
T
E
R
A
C
Y
CA
M
P
A
I
G
N
4
1
,
6
2
1
41
,
4
5
9
‐
(4
1
,
4
5
9
)
(1
)
24
4
4
3
1
1
0
5
‐BU
L
L
E
T
PR
O
O
F
VE
S
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
1
5
,
5
7
6
20
,
0
0
0
15
,
0
0
0
(5
,
0
0
0
)
(0
)
24
5
4
3
1
1
3
5
‐RE
F
N
D
S
&
R
E
B
A
T
E
S
FR
O
M
GO
V
T
3
7
,
5
9
5
10
0
,
0
0
0
76
,
0
0
0
(2
4
,
0
0
0
)
(0
)
24
6
4
3
1
1
4
5
‐ME
A
S
U
R
E
M2
FA
I
R
SH
A
R
E
1
3
1
,
4
2
7
12
8
,
4
7
8
13
0
,
0
0
0
1,
5
2
2
0
24
7
4
3
1
2
4
5
‐CA
L
OE
S
1
9
6
,
0
1
1
‐
‐
‐
24
8
4
3
1
2
4
6
‐ME
D
I
‐CA
L
IG
T
3
5
6
,
5
5
4
61
2
,
8
2
8
‐
(6
1
2
,
8
2
8
)
(1
)
Grant to be taken to Council July 2018
24
9
4
3
1
2
5
0
‐EM
E
R
G
E
N
C
Y
MG
M
T
AS
S
T
GR
N
T
1
2
,
9
8
0
13
,
0
8
4
13
,
1
0
0
16
0
25
0
4
3
1
2
6
0
‐DE
P
T
OF
CO
N
S
E
R
V
A
T
I
O
N
GR
N
T
2
2
,
2
8
7
22
,
0
0
0
22
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
25
1
4
3
1
2
8
5
‐SA
N
T
A
AN
A
CO
L
L
E
G
E
3
9
,
6
5
7
95
,
0
0
0
75
,
0
0
0
(2
0
,
0
0
0
)
(0
)
25
2
4
3
1
2
9
5
‐AB
1
0
9
FU
N
D
I
N
G
RE
I
M
B
1
3
,
2
2
1
11
,
5
5
5
‐
(1
1
,
5
5
5
)
(1
)
25
3
4
3
1
3
1
5
‐CO
U
N
T
Y
OF
OR
A
N
G
E
CO
N
T
R
B
1
9
8
,
9
4
6
20
0
,
0
0
0
20
0
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
25
4
4
3
1
3
2
5
‐BB
S
C
MA
I
N
T
2
8
,
7
2
6
25
,
0
0
0
25
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
25
5
4
3
1
3
6
5
‐IC
E
/
H
S
I
L
A
PR
E
D
A
T
O
R
GR
A
N
T
3
1
‐
‐
‐
25
6
4
3
1
3
7
5
‐CA
CO
A
S
T
A
L
CO
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
1
0
,
9
5
8
‐
‐
‐
25
7
4
3
1
4
6
5
‐BS
C
C
LO
C
A
L
LA
W
EN
F
O
R
C
E
M
E
N
T
5
7
,
0
8
8
‐
‐
‐
25
8
4
3
1
4
7
2
‐AB
C
GR
A
N
T
2
6
,
1
0
9
‐
‐
‐
25
9
LI
C
E
N
S
E
S
PE
R
M
I
T
S
5
,
2
7
2
,
4
0
0
4,
4
8
9
,
2
8
9
5,
0
2
1
,
4
5
1
53
2
,
1
6
2
0
26
0
4
2
1
0
0
0
‐BI
C
Y
C
L
E
LI
C
E
N
S
E
S
7
8
60
15
0
90
2
6 (R
E
V
E
N
U
E
)
\
\
c
n
b
.
l
c
l
\
d
a
t
a
\
U
s
e
r
s
\
F
I
N
\
S
h
a
r
e
d
\
A
d
m
i
n
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
\
R
E
P
O
R
T
S
\
2
0
1
8
\
0
5
1
0
1
8
\
F
Y
18
to
19
Bu
d
g
e
t
Variances for Fin Committee (00000005) FINAL
Re
f
R
o
w
La
b
e
l
s
2
0
1
7
Ac
t
u
a
l
s
2
0
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
2
0
1
9
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
Va
r
i
a
n
c
e
20
1
9
V
20
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
% Ch
a
n
g
e
26
1
4
2
1
0
1
0
‐DO
G
LI
C
E
N
S
E
S
7
4
,
4
0
2
78
,
5
0
0
11
8
,
0
0
0
39
,
5
0
0
1
No longer abating revenue to pay Petdata contract
26
2
4
2
1
0
1
1
‐DO
G
LI
C
E
N
S
E
S
‐
CI
T
Y
NA
T
BA
N
K
2
1
1
50
0
10
0
(4
0
0
)
(1
)
26
3
4
2
1
0
1
5
‐OU
T
D
O
O
R
DI
N
I
N
G
PE
R
M
I
T
2
,
7
0
8
3,
0
0
0
2,
7
0
0
(3
0
0
)
(0
)
26
4
4
2
1
0
2
0
‐GR
E
A
S
E
DI
S
P
O
S
A
L
IN
LI
E
U
6
8
4
3,
5
6
0
‐
(3
,
5
6
0
)
(1
)
26
5
4
2
1
0
2
5
‐ST
R
E
E
T
CL
O
S
U
R
E
PE
R
M
I
T
S
6
8
,
4
1
1
50
,
0
0
0
50
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
26
6
4
2
1
0
3
5
‐RE
C
O
R
D
S
MA
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
FE
E
7
6
,
1
8
4
70
,
0
0
0
70
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
26
7
4
2
2
0
0
0
‐BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
PE
R
M
I
T
S
3
,
2
6
2
,
9
1
9
2,
7
7
9
,
2
3
0
3,
2
7
9
,
0
4
5
49
9
,
8
1
5
0
Seeing larger projects in Comm Development
26
8
4
2
2
0
0
5
‐EL
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
PE
R
M
I
T
S
3
7
8
,
7
6
0
34
4
,
9
5
6
36
9
,
0
1
8
24
,
0
6
2
0
26
9
4
2
2
0
1
0
‐GR
A
D
I
N
G
PE
R
M
I
T
S
2
6
8
,
0
3
7
25
9
,
8
6
8
25
9
,
7
9
2
(7
6
)
(0
)
27
0
4
2
2
0
1
5
‐DE
M
O
L
I
T
I
O
N
PE
R
M
I
T
S
8
6
,
9
4
2
40
,
0
0
0
60
,
0
0
0
20
,
0
0
0
1
Seeing larger projects in Comm Development
27
1
4
2
2
0
2
0
‐PL
U
M
B
I
N
G
PE
R
M
I
T
S
3
1
1
,
6
1
7
30
0
,
3
7
4
30
5
,
2
4
8
4,
8
7
4
0
27
2
4
2
2
0
2
5
‐HE
A
T
I
N
G
PE
R
M
I
T
S
2
7
3
,
5
0
1
26
7
,
1
0
9
26
0
,
8
7
6
(6
,
2
3
3
)
(0
)
27
3
4
2
2
0
3
5
‐PO
O
L
/
S
P
A
PE
R
M
I
T
S
8
3
,
4
0
9
92
,
3
6
8
81
,
1
0
6
(1
1
,
2
6
2
)
(0
)
27
4
4
2
2
0
4
5
‐AF
F
O
R
D
A
B
L
E
HO
U
S
I
N
G
2
2
2
,
2
0
1
‐
‐
‐
27
5
4
2
2
0
5
0
‐PH
O
T
O
VO
L
T
A
I
C
PL
A
N
CH
E
C
K
3
0
,
2
1
7
34
,
7
7
3
30
,
8
2
6
(3
,
9
4
7
)
(0
)
27
6
4
2
2
0
5
5
‐PH
O
T
O
VO
L
T
A
I
C
PE
R
M
I
T
4
0
,
9
9
5
44
,
9
8
7
40
,
6
6
8
(4
,
3
1
9
)
(0
)
27
7
4
2
3
0
0
0
‐HA
R
B
O
R
PL
A
N
CH
E
C
K
(B
L
D
G
)
2
3
,
8
5
2
33
,
6
9
8
23
,
3
9
9
(1
0
,
2
9
9
)
(0
)
27
8
4
2
3
0
0
5
‐HA
R
B
O
R
PE
R
M
I
T
2
1
,
0
1
7
23
,
8
0
5
23
,
9
2
3
11
8
0
27
9
4
2
4
0
0
0
‐PO
L
I
C
E
TO
W
FR
A
N
C
H
I
S
E
FE
E
4
5
,
1
6
6
62
,
0
0
0
45
,
0
0
0
(1
7
,
0
0
0
)
(0
)
28
0
4
2
4
0
0
5
‐SO
L
I
C
I
T
A
T
I
O
N
PE
R
M
I
T
FE
E
8
1
8
50
0
50
0
‐
‐
28
1
4
2
4
0
0
6
‐PA
W
N
/
2
N
D
HA
N
D
DE
A
L
E
R
PR
M
I
T
FE
E
2
7
1
‐
1,
1
0
0
1,
1
0
0
28
2
MI
S
C
RE
V
E
N
U
E
S
1
,
6
6
1
,
3
1
8
76
2
,
2
3
6
37
2
,
4
3
6
(3
8
9
,
8
0
0
)
(1
)
Donations of Friends/NB Library Foundation will be
28
3
5
1
1
0
1
5
‐AD
A
ED
U
.
& EN
F
O
R
C
E
1
3
,
8
5
8
7,
9
1
3
10
,
0
8
2
2,
1
6
9
0
budgeted once received
28
4
5
1
1
0
2
0
‐ST
A
R
T
VI
D
E
O
SA
L
E
S
‐
1,
7
0
0
1,
7
0
0
‐
‐
28
5
5
1
1
0
3
5
‐SA
L
E
OF
MA
P
S
& PU
B
2
8
,
9
1
1
26
,
5
0
0
28
,
5
5
0
2,
0
5
0
0
28
6
5
1
1
0
4
0
‐DA
M
A
G
E
TO
CI
T
Y
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
1
7
7
,
6
8
1
16
7
,
5
0
0
15
7
,
5
0
0
(1
0
,
0
0
0
)
(0
)
28
7
5
1
1
0
4
5
‐HO
A
G
SR
TR
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
GR
A
N
T
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
10
0
,
0
0
0
10
0
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
28
8
5
1
1
0
5
0
‐PR
I
V
A
T
E
RE
F
U
N
D
S
& RE
B
A
T
E
S
5
4
8
,
6
1
3
77
,
0
0
0
77
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
28
9
5
1
1
0
5
5
‐RE
V
E
N
U
E
N.
O
.
C
.
(
2
4
9
)
15
,
0
0
0
15
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
29
0
5
1
1
0
6
0
‐PR
O
G
R
A
M
RE
V
E
N
U
E
S
NO
C
2
8
2
25
0
25
0
‐
‐
29
1
5
1
1
0
6
5
‐CA
B
L
E
FR
A
N
C
H
I
S
E
PE
G
FE
E
S
3
1
4
,
4
0
2
27
0
,
1
1
9
30
0
,
0
0
0
29
,
8
8
1
0
29
2
5
1
1
0
7
5
‐BA
D
DE
B
T
(
3
5
9
,
5
6
7
)
(4
6
7
,
6
4
6
)
(4
6
7
,
6
4
6
)
‐
‐
29
3
5
1
1
0
8
0
‐FR
I
E
N
D
S
OF
TH
E
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
4
4
1
25
0
,
0
0
0
‐
(2
5
0
,
0
0
0
)
(1
)
FY 19 donations not budgeted
29
4
5
1
1
0
8
5
‐NB
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
FO
U
N
D
A
T
I
O
N
1
9
7
,
4
1
6
16
3
,
9
0
0
‐
(1
6
3
,
9
0
0
)
(1
)
FY 19 donations not budgeted
29
5
5
1
1
1
0
0
‐IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
PR
E
M
FR
O
M
EE
1
0
,
1
2
4
‐
‐
‐
29
6
5
1
1
1
0
1
‐DE
N
T
A
L
PR
E
M
FR
O
M
EE
(
2
1
0
)
‐
‐
‐
29
7
5
1
1
1
0
2
‐VI
S
I
O
N
PR
E
M
FR
O
M
EE
(
2
8
)
‐
‐
‐
29
8
5
1
1
1
1
0
‐VN
B
PU
B
L
I
C
BE
N
E
F
I
T
FE
E
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
15
0
,
0
0
0
15
0
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
29
9
5
1
1
1
1
5
‐SC
E
RE
B
A
T
E
S
/
R
E
F
U
N
D
S
3
2
9
,
6
4
4
‐
‐
‐
30
0
OT
R
FI
N
A
N
C
N
G
SO
U
R
C
E
S
1
0
8
,
2
5
1
76
,
5
0
0
70
,
0
0
0
(6
,
5
0
0
)
(0
)
30
1
6
1
1
0
0
5
‐SA
L
E
OF
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
1
2
,
3
2
7
15
,
0
0
0
10
,
0
0
0
(5
,
0
0
0
)
(0
)
30
2
6
1
1
0
1
0
‐SP
E
C
I
A
L
LI
G
H
T
I
N
G
DI
S
T
R
I
C
T
8
0
,
7
2
3
60
,
0
0
0
60
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
7 (R
E
V
E
N
U
E
)
\
\
c
n
b
.
l
c
l
\
d
a
t
a
\
U
s
e
r
s
\
F
I
N
\
S
h
a
r
e
d
\
A
d
m
i
n
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
\
R
E
P
O
R
T
S
\
2
0
1
8
\
0
5
1
0
1
8
\
F
Y
18
to
19
Bu
d
g
e
t
Variances for Fin Committee (00000005) FINAL
Re
f
R
o
w
La
b
e
l
s
2
0
1
7
Ac
t
u
a
l
s
2
0
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
2
0
1
9
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
Va
r
i
a
n
c
e
20
1
9
V
20
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
% Ch
a
n
g
e
30
3
6
1
1
0
2
5
‐SA
L
E
OF
SC
R
A
P
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
1
5
,
2
0
1
1,
5
0
0
‐
(1
,
5
0
0
)
(1
)
30
4
IN
V
E
S
T
M
E
N
T
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
5
8
5
,
1
5
2
1,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
1,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
30
5
5
4
1
0
0
0
‐IN
V
E
S
T
M
E
N
T
IN
C
O
M
E
5
8
5
,
1
5
2
1,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
1,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
30
6
TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
S
4
6
2
,
7
9
2
56
1
,
0
0
0
‐
(5
6
1
,
0
0
0
)
(1
)
30
7
6
9
1
0
1
2
‐TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
IN
FU
N
D
01
2
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
56
1
,
0
0
0
‐
(5
6
1
,
0
0
0
)
(1
)
30
8
6
9
1
1
6
1
‐TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
IN
NP
T
CS
T
AN
N
E
X
RC
P
T
2
,
7
9
2
‐
‐
‐
30
9
6
9
1
7
6
5
‐TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
IN
IT
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
6
0
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
‐
31
0
Gr
a
n
d
To
t
a
l
2
0
9
,
1
6
9
,
3
2
2
21
3
,
7
5
5
,
4
1
1
21
9
,
8
0
9
,
1
0
8
6,
0
5
3
,
6
9
7
0
8 (R
E
V
E
N
U
E
)
\
\
c
n
b
.
l
c
l
\
d
a
t
a
\
U
s
e
r
s
\
F
I
N
\
S
h
a
r
e
d
\
A
d
m
i
n
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
\
R
E
P
O
R
T
S
\
2
0
1
8
\
0
5
1
0
1
8
\
F
Y
18
to
19
Bu
d
g
e
t
Variances for Fin Committee (00000005) FINAL
EX
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
CO
M
P
A
R
I
S
O
N
/
V
A
R
I
A
N
C
E
AL
L
FU
N
D
S
/
A
L
L
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
S
4/
1
1
/
2
0
1
8
Fu
n
d
Tit
l
e
GE
N
E
R
A
L
FU
N
D
De
p
t
Ti
t
l
e
(A
l
l
)
Re
f
R
o
w
La
b
e
l
s
20
1
7
Ac
t
u
a
l
20
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
20
1
9
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Va
r
i
a
n
c
e
20
1
9
v
20
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
% Ch
a
n
g
e
31
1
RE
G
U
L
A
R
SA
L
A
R
I
E
S
‐
MI
S
C
E
L
L
A
N
E
O
U
S
39
,
1
4
0
,
4
7
8
41
,
9
1
8
,
1
9
6
42
,
2
1
8
,
9
0
5
30
0
,
7
0
8
0.
7
%
31
2
7
1
1
0
0
1
‐SA
L
A
R
I
E
S
MI
S
C
E
L
L
A
N
E
O
U
S
33
,
2
0
7
,
7
0
5
35
,
2
0
7
,
3
3
4
35
,
2
8
5
,
1
2
1
77
,
7
8
7
0.
2
%
N
o
CO
L
A
'
s
,
on
l
y
me
r
i
t
s
,
at
t
r
i
t
i
o
n
31
3
7
1
1
0
0
3
‐SA
L
A
R
I
E
S
PA
R
T
TIM
E
5,
1
5
4
,
9
5
3
5,
9
2
7
,
6
9
6
6,
0
8
9
,
7
7
4
16
2
,
0
7
8
2.
7
%
J
u
l
y
20
1
8
2%
CO
L
A
fo
r
AN
B
O
L
;
1.5% for PTEANB
31
4
7
1
1
0
0
4
‐SA
L
A
R
I
E
S
SE
A
S
O
N
A
L
49
2
‐
‐
‐
31
5
7
1
2
0
0
3
‐NI
G
H
T
DI
F
F
E
R
E
N
T
I
A
L
MI
S
C
75
,
3
9
6
61
,
4
9
7
61
,
4
9
7
‐
0.
0
%
31
6
7
1
2
0
0
4
‐CE
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
PA
Y
38
5
,
8
5
5
37
4
,
6
8
0
38
4
,
7
1
4
10
,
0
3
5
2.
7
%
B
a
s
e
d
on
ce
r
t
ac
t
u
a
l
pa
y
c
o
d
e
s
31
7
7
1
2
0
0
6
‐BI
L
I
N
G
U
A
L
PA
Y
97
,
4
5
4
96
,
6
0
0
10
5
,
0
0
0
8,
4
0
0
8.
7
%
31
8
7
1
2
0
1
1
‐HO
L
I
D
A
Y
PA
Y
MI
S
C
E
L
L
A
N
E
O
U
S
21
8
,
6
2
3
25
0
,
3
8
9
29
2
,
7
9
8
42
,
4
0
9
16
.
9
%
N
e
w
EE
el
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
31
9
RE
G
U
L
A
R
SA
L
A
R
I
E
S
‐
PU
B
L
I
C
SA
F
E
T
Y
31
,
2
5
5
,
6
8
5
33
,
7
3
2
,
2
0
6
34
,
6
6
3
,
0
9
9
93
0
,
8
9
2
2.
8
%
32
0
7
1
1
0
0
2
‐SA
L
A
R
I
E
S
SA
F
E
T
Y
28
,
5
3
4
,
8
3
1
30
,
7
6
0
,
3
6
5
31
,
2
1
7
,
2
8
8
45
6
,
9
2
2
1.
5
%
N
o
CO
L
A
'
s
,
on
l
y
me
r
i
t
s
,
at
t
r
i
t
i
o
n
32
1
7
1
2
0
0
1
‐SP
E
C
I
A
L
AS
S
I
G
N
M
E
N
T
PA
Y
55
,
3
2
3
57
,
2
4
9
57
,
9
9
5
74
6
1.
3
%
32
2
7
1
2
0
0
2
‐TI
L
L
E
R
PA
Y
22
,
1
1
0
20
,
0
0
0
20
,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
32
3
7
1
2
0
0
5
‐EM
T
PA
Y
11
,
2
7
6
10
,
0
0
0
10
,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
32
4
7
1
2
0
0
7
‐LO
N
G
E
V
I
T
Y
PA
Y
13
7
,
4
8
2
14
2
,
2
6
9
18
1
,
9
3
1
39
,
6
6
2
27
.
9
%
B
a
s
e
d
on
lo
n
g
e
v
i
t
y
pa
y
c
o
d
e
s
& scheduled increases
32
5
7
1
2
0
0
8
‐MA
T
R
O
N
PA
Y
7,
4
5
6
6,
5
0
0
6,
5
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
32
6
7
1
2
0
0
9
‐SC
H
O
L
A
S
T
I
C
AC
H
I
E
V
E
M
E
N
T
1,
3
3
1
,
2
9
2
1,
4
0
6
,
2
8
3
1,
3
6
0
,
6
0
1
(4
5
,
6
8
2
)
‐3.
2
%
32
7
7
1
2
0
1
0
‐ED
U
C
A
T
I
O
N
RE
T
E
N
T
I
O
N
14
3
,
0
8
9
14
9
,
8
6
0
15
1
,
4
8
4
1,
6
2
4
1.
1
%
32
8
7
1
2
0
1
2
‐HO
L
I
D
A
Y
PA
Y
SA
F
E
T
Y
98
7
,
3
3
5
1,
0
7
7
,
1
0
2
1,
4
3
7
,
9
3
9
36
0
,
8
3
7
33
.
5
%
N
e
w
EE
el
e
c
t
i
o
n
32
9
7
1
2
0
1
3
‐PM
A
LE
A
D
E
R
S
H
I
P
CO
M
P
E
N
S
A
T
I
O
N
25
,
4
9
1
27
,
7
6
4
30
,
7
0
0
2,
9
3
6
10
.
6
%
33
0
7
1
2
0
1
6
‐MO
T
O
R
OF
F
I
C
E
R
PA
Y
‐
44
,
1
7
8
13
0
,
9
5
0
86
,
7
7
1
19
6
.
4
%
B
u
d
g
e
t
e
d
co
r
r
e
c
t
l
y
fo
r
fu
l
l
‐year in FY 19; previously charged to OT
33
1
7
1
2
0
1
8
‐CA
N
I
N
E
PA
Y
‐
19
,
6
3
6
35
,
8
5
4
16
,
2
1
9
82
.
6
%
B
u
d
g
e
t
e
d
co
r
r
e
c
t
l
y
fo
r
fu
l
l
‐year in FY 19; previously charged to OT
33
2
7
1
2
0
1
9
‐SA
F
E
T
Y
CE
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
PA
Y
‐
11
,
0
0
0
21
,
8
5
7
10
,
8
5
7
98
.
7
%
33
3
OV
E
R
T
I
M
E
PA
Y
S
9,
2
6
1
,
4
4
0
6,
9
6
1
,
8
3
1
6,
7
1
2
,
1
2
8
(2
4
9
,
7
0
3
)
‐3.
6
%
33
4
7
1
3
0
0
1
‐OV
E
R
T
I
M
E
MI
S
C
& 1/
2
TI
M
E
1,
3
7
0
,
7
9
8
74
3
,
3
0
0
77
3
,
3
0
0
30
,
0
0
0
4.
0
%
33
5
7
1
3
0
0
2
‐OV
E
R
T
I
M
E
SA
F
T
Y
& 1/
2
TI
M
E
2,
6
1
7
,
7
5
2
1,
8
4
4
,
3
6
1
1,
5
0
4
,
6
5
8
(3
3
9
,
7
0
3
)
‐18
.
4
%
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
fo
r
FY
18
gr
a
n
t
s
(OTS, etc.)
33
6
7
1
3
0
0
3
‐OV
E
R
T
I
M
E
PL
A
N
N
E
D
22
2
,
9
8
1
1,
1
6
5
,
6
5
6
1,
0
7
0
,
6
5
6
(9
5
,
0
0
0
)
‐8.
1
%
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
fo
r
FY
18
gr
a
n
t
s
(OTS, etc.)
33
7
7
1
3
0
0
4
‐OV
E
R
T
I
M
E
VA
C
A
T
I
O
N
RE
L
I
E
F
2,
5
5
8
,
8
6
0
1,
9
8
8
,
8
0
9
1,
9
8
8
,
8
0
9
‐
0.
0
%
33
8
7
1
3
0
0
5
‐OV
E
R
T
I
M
E
UN
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
L
E
D
2,
1
7
9
,
2
3
9
97
0
,
8
9
3
97
0
,
8
9
3
‐
0.
0
%
33
9
7
1
3
0
0
6
‐FI
R
E
FL
S
A
OT
21
8
,
7
3
0
15
6
,
0
0
0
27
5
,
0
0
0
11
9
,
0
0
0
76
.
3
%
I
n
c
r
ba
s
e
d
on
tr
e
n
d
34
0
7
1
3
0
0
7
‐DU
T
Y
PA
Y
27
,
0
0
6
20
,
0
0
0
20
,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
34
1
7
1
3
0
0
8
‐CA
L
L
BA
C
K
PA
Y
20
,
7
9
7
16
,
5
0
0
16
,
5
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
34
2
7
1
3
0
0
9
‐ST
A
N
D
BY
PA
Y
45
,
2
7
6
56
,
3
1
2
92
,
3
1
2
36
,
0
0
0
63
.
9
%
M
a
r
i
n
e
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
Ni
g
h
t
Standby program enhancement
34
3
OT
H
E
R
PA
Y
S
11
7
,
5
8
3
7,
3
4
4
15
3
,
0
5
1
14
5
,
7
0
7
19
8
4
.
0
%
34
4
7
1
4
0
0
1
‐LU
M
P
SU
M
PA
Y
M
E
N
T
‐
‐
‐
‐
34
5
7
1
4
0
0
2
‐TE
R
M
I
N
A
T
I
O
N
PA
Y
MI
S
C
‐
‐
‐
‐
34
6
7
1
4
0
0
4
‐PA
I
D
FL
E
X
/
S
P
I
L
L
O
V
E
R
PA
Y
‐
‐
‐
‐
34
7
7
1
4
0
0
6
‐PA
I
D
CO
M
P
/
S
P
I
L
L
O
V
E
R
PA
Y
‐
‐
‐
‐
34
8
7
1
5
0
0
1
‐RI
D
E
S
H
A
R
E
IN
C
E
N
T
I
V
E
‐
‐
35
,
0
0
0
35
,
0
0
0
Ri
d
e
s
h
a
r
e
In
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
s
34
9
7
1
5
0
0
2
‐CA
T
A
S
T
R
O
P
H
I
C
LE
A
V
E
‐
‐
‐
‐
35
0
7
1
5
0
0
4
‐SA
L
A
R
Y
RE
I
M
B
U
R
S
E
M
E
N
T
‐
‐
‐
‐
35
1
7
1
5
0
0
5
‐SA
L
A
R
Y
SA
V
I
N
G
S
‐
(1
1
0
,
0
0
0
)
‐
11
0
,
0
0
0
‐
10
0
.
0
%
35
2
7
1
5
0
0
6
‐CO
U
N
C
I
L
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
S
11
7
,
5
8
3
11
7
,
3
4
4
11
8
,
0
5
1
70
7
0.
6
%
35
3
HE
A
L
T
H
/
D
E
N
T
A
L
/
V
I
S
I
O
N
12
,
1
9
4
,
4
4
4
13
,
9
1
4
,
4
2
5
14
,
0
6
7
,
3
8
7
15
2
,
9
6
2
1.
1
%
35
4
7
2
1
0
0
1
‐CA
F
E
T
E
R
I
A
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
FU
L
L
T
I
M
E
11
,
9
0
8
,
5
5
9
13
,
7
4
5
,
7
5
3
13
,
8
9
5
,
5
2
0
14
9
,
7
6
7
1.
1
%
35
5
7
2
1
0
0
2
‐CA
F
E
T
E
R
I
A
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
PA
R
T
TI
M
E
28
5
,
8
8
5
16
8
,
6
7
2
17
1
,
8
6
7
3,
1
9
5
1.
9
%
9 (E
X
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
)
\
\
c
n
b
.
l
c
l
\
d
a
t
a
\
U
s
e
r
s
\
F
I
N
\
S
h
a
r
e
d
\
A
d
m
i
n
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
\
R
E
P
O
R
T
S
\
2
0
1
8
\
0
5
1
0
1
8
\
F
Y
18
to
19
Bu
d
g
e
t
Variances for Fin Committee (00000005) FINAL
Re
f
R
o
w
La
b
e
l
s
20
1
7
Ac
t
u
a
l
20
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
20
1
9
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Va
r
i
a
n
c
e
20
1
9
v
20
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
% Ch
a
n
g
e
35
6
PE
N
S
I
O
N
NO
R
M
A
L
CO
S
T
14
,
6
1
3
,
8
2
7
15
,
2
9
5
,
8
9
1
15
,
8
4
0
,
3
9
0
54
4
,
4
9
8
3.
6
%
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
$3
3
0
k
fo
r
No
r
m
a
l
Cost (includes offset by EE contributions)
35
7
7
2
2
0
0
1
‐PE
N
S
I
O
N
ME
M
B
E
R
CO
N
T
R
I
B
MI
S
C
3,
4
7
8
,
0
7
4
3,
5
9
2
,
5
6
5
3,
5
0
2
,
1
8
3
(9
0
,
3
8
1
)
‐2.
5
%
A
t
t
r
i
t
i
o
n
,
ch
a
n
g
i
n
g
tie
r
st
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
35
8
7
2
2
0
0
2
‐PE
N
S
I
O
N
ME
M
B
E
R
CO
N
T
R
I
B
SA
F
E
T
Y
2,
9
5
9
,
5
4
2
3,
1
0
7
,
3
4
0
3,
1
9
7
,
2
1
7
89
,
8
7
7
2.
9
%
M
e
r
i
t
s
,
ch
a
n
g
i
n
g
ti
e
r
st
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
35
9
7
2
3
0
0
2
‐PE
N
S
I
O
N
NO
R
M
A
L
CO
S
T
MI
S
C
2,
2
3
1
,
3
4
6
2,
3
5
0
,
9
8
0
2,
5
6
3
,
2
6
4
21
2
,
2
8
3
9.
0
%
.
2
6
%
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
No
r
m
a
l
Co
s
t
36
0
7
2
3
0
0
3
‐PE
N
S
I
O
N
NO
R
M
A
L
CO
S
T
SA
F
E
T
Y
5,
8
1
7
,
3
8
9
6,
1
1
8
,
3
4
3
6,
4
3
1
,
5
0
6
31
3
,
1
6
3
5.
1
%
.
4
4
%
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
No
r
m
a
l
Co
s
t
36
1
7
2
3
0
0
4
‐RE
T
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
PA
R
T
TI
M
E
/
T
E
M
P
12
7
,
4
7
5
12
6
,
6
6
4
14
6
,
2
2
0
19
,
5
5
7
15
.
4
%
36
2
PE
N
S
I
O
N
UA
L
20
,
1
3
6
,
0
2
2
31
,
9
6
8
,
9
1
3
32
,
6
0
6
,
0
1
8
63
7
,
1
0
5
2.
0
%
36
3
7
2
5
0
0
1
‐PE
N
S
I
O
N
UA
L
CO
S
T
MI
S
C
6,
7
7
6
,
9
7
3
7,
9
2
9
,
5
8
2
8,
1
3
4
,
3
0
7
20
4
,
7
2
5
2.
6
%
P
E
R
S
Va
l
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
36
4
7
2
5
0
0
2
‐PE
N
S
I
O
N
UA
L
CO
S
T
SA
F
E
T
Y
13
,
3
5
9
,
0
4
9
15
,
6
8
0
,
0
9
0
16
,
1
5
1
,
9
6
4
47
1
,
8
7
4
3.
0
%
P
E
R
S
Va
l
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
36
5
7
2
5
0
0
3
‐DI
S
C
R
E
T
I
O
N
A
R
Y
UA
L
MI
S
C
‐
3,
2
6
3
,
1
8
0
2,
7
7
4
,
8
0
6
(4
8
8
,
3
7
4
)
‐15
.
0
%
B
a
s
e
d
on
PE
R
S
a
b
l
e
sa
l
a
r
i
e
s
36
6
7
2
5
0
0
4
‐DI
S
C
R
E
T
I
O
N
A
R
Y
UA
L
SA
F
E
T
Y
‐
5,
0
9
6
,
0
6
1
5,
5
4
4
,
9
4
1
44
8
,
8
8
0
8.
8
%
B
a
s
e
d
on
PE
R
S
a
b
l
e
sa
l
a
r
i
e
s
36
7
PE
N
S
I
O
N
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
CO
N
T
R
I
B
U
T
I
O
N
(8
,
7
0
5
,
3
4
1
)
(9
,
2
5
5
,
4
7
4
)
(9
,
4
7
0
,
4
4
1
)
(2
1
4
,
9
6
7
)
2
.
3
%
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
$3
3
0
k
fo
r
No
r
m
a
l
Cost (includes offset by EE contributions)
36
8
7
2
4
0
0
1
‐EE
CO
N
T
R
I
B
U
T
I
O
N
MI
S
C
(4
,
6
1
4
,
1
6
3
)
(4
,
8
3
8
,
8
4
7
)
(4
,
8
8
5
,
7
5
9
)
(4
6
,
9
1
1
)
1
.
0
%
N
e
g
o
t
i
a
t
e
d
pe
r
MO
U
s
36
9
7
2
4
0
0
2
‐EE
CO
N
T
R
I
B
U
T
I
O
N
SA
F
E
T
Y
(4
,
0
9
1
,
1
7
9
)
(4
,
4
1
6
,
6
2
7
)
(4
,
5
8
4
,
6
8
3
)
(1
6
8
,
0
5
6
)
3
.
8
%
N
e
g
o
t
i
a
t
e
d
pe
r
MO
U
s
37
0
OT
H
E
R
BE
N
E
F
I
T
S
1,
8
0
9
,
8
1
9
1,
9
5
4
,
2
6
7
2,
0
2
2
,
4
2
7
68
,
1
5
9
3.
5
%
37
1
7
2
7
0
0
1
‐CA
R
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
67
,
9
5
8
63
,
0
9
2
71
,
4
0
0
8,
3
0
8
13
.
2
%
37
2
7
2
7
0
0
2
‐WE
L
N
E
S
S
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
75
2
75
0
75
0
‐
0.
0
%
37
3
7
2
7
0
0
3
‐CE
L
L
PH
O
N
E
ST
I
P
E
N
D
18
6
,
7
3
2
19
3
,
7
3
5
22
2
,
5
6
4
28
,
8
2
9
14
.
9
%
C
i
t
y
‐wi
d
e
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
,
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
by Department Directors
37
4
7
2
7
0
0
9
‐AN
B
O
L
EQ
U
I
P
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
32
,
2
0
0
34
,
9
0
0
34
,
9
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
37
5
7
2
7
0
1
0
‐AN
B
O
L
CA
N
C
E
R
SC
R
E
E
N
I
N
G
1,
2
4
5
10
,
0
0
0
10
,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
37
6
7
2
7
0
1
1
‐LM
A
SU
N
B
L
O
C
K
& SU
N
G
L
A
S
S
5,
3
0
0
5,
7
0
0
5,
7
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
37
7
7
2
7
0
1
2
‐LI
F
E
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
62
,
7
3
8
65
,
6
9
5
64
,
7
2
5
(9
7
0
)
‐1.
5
%
37
8
7
2
7
0
1
3
‐EM
P
AS
S
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
PR
O
G
R
A
M
14
,
0
0
4
13
,
7
8
4
13
,
6
0
8
(1
7
5
)
‐1.
3
%
37
9
7
2
7
0
1
4
‐OT
H
E
R
BE
N
E
F
I
T
S
10
,
4
8
7
8,
1
3
8
7,
6
5
7
(4
8
1
)
‐5.
9
%
38
0
7
2
7
0
1
5
‐UN
E
M
P
L
O
Y
M
E
N
T
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
24
,
0
6
2
‐
‐
‐
38
1
7
2
7
0
1
6
‐ME
D
I
C
A
R
E
FR
I
N
G
E
S
1,
1
7
0
,
0
5
3
1,
3
0
8
,
0
9
1
1,
3
3
7
,
7
6
3
29
,
6
7
2
2.
3
%
B
a
s
e
d
on
Me
d
i
c
a
r
e
wa
g
e
s
38
2
7
2
7
0
1
7
‐PA
R
S
DC
40
1
A
14
,
7
5
8
19
,
9
5
1
21
,
7
2
8
1,
7
7
7
8.
9
%
38
3
7
2
7
0
1
8
‐PO
R
A
C
RE
T
ME
D
TR
U
S
T
21
9
,
5
3
0
23
0
,
4
3
1
23
1
,
6
3
1
1,
2
0
0
0.
5
%
38
4
7
2
7
0
1
9
‐SU
R
V
I
V
O
R
BE
N
E
F
I
T
‐
‐
‐
‐
38
5
RE
T
I
R
E
E
HE
A
L
T
H
PR
O
G
R
A
M
4,
2
3
3
,
2
4
5
4,
3
9
6
,
3
4
5
4,
3
1
7
,
0
1
6
(7
9
,
3
2
9
)
‐1.
8
%
38
6
7
2
6
0
0
2
‐AN
N
U
A
L
OP
E
B
PR
E
M
I
U
M
3,
5
8
4
,
8
1
6
3,
6
9
2
,
6
5
6
3,
5
0
2
,
7
2
4
(1
8
9
,
9
3
2
)
‐5.
1
%
B
a
s
e
d
on
Va
l
38
7
7
2
7
0
0
4
‐RH
S
$2
.
5
0
CO
N
T
R
I
B
U
T
I
O
N
64
7
,
0
9
1
70
2
,
4
8
9
81
3
,
0
9
2
11
0
,
6
0
3
15
.
7
%
V
e
s
t
i
n
g
EE
'
s
in
FY
1
9
38
8
7
2
7
0
0
5
‐HY
B
R
I
D
CO
N
T
R
I
B
DE
P
T
DI
R
E
C
T
O
R
1,
3
3
8
1,
2
0
0
1,
2
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
38
9
7
2
7
0
0
7
‐PA
Y
M
E
N
T
> AR
C
‐
‐
‐
‐
39
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
,
CL
A
I
M
S
,
JU
D
G
E
M
E
N
T
S
AN
D
LE
G
A
L
DE
F
E
N
S
E
4,
5
2
3
,
5
7
8
4,
6
5
1
,
6
3
9
6,
0
6
6
,
6
4
9
1,
4
1
5
,
0
1
0
30
.
4
%
39
1
8
9
1
0
0
1
‐GE
N
E
R
A
L
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
3,
7
3
3
,
4
4
0
3,
7
3
3
,
1
8
2
5,
1
7
2
,
5
2
4
1,
4
3
9
,
3
4
2
38
.
6
%
G
L
in
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
by
$1,439,342
39
2
8
9
1
0
0
8
‐BE
N
E
F
I
T
S
11
,
1
5
0
27
,
0
0
0
20
,
0
0
0
(7
,
0
0
0
)
‐25
.
9
%
39
3
8
9
1
0
1
0
‐RE
C
R
U
I
T
I
N
G
95
,
8
7
2
12
8
,
4
5
7
12
1
,
1
2
5
(7
,
3
3
2
)
‐5.
7
%
39
4
8
9
1
0
1
8
‐LI
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
EX
P
E
N
S
E
‐
‐
‐
‐
39
5
8
9
1
0
2
0
‐OU
T
S
I
D
E
CO
U
N
S
E
L
AD
V
I
S
O
R
Y
15
2
,
2
6
8
18
0
,
0
0
0
17
0
,
0
0
0
(1
0
,
0
0
0
)
‐5.
6
%
39
6
8
9
1
0
2
1
‐OU
T
S
I
D
E
CO
U
N
S
E
L
SP
E
C
LI
T
31
4
,
1
7
5
40
0
,
0
0
0
40
0
,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
39
7
8
9
1
0
2
2
‐OU
T
S
I
D
E
CO
U
N
S
E
L
CO
D
E
EN
F
48
,
5
5
0
25
,
0
0
0
25
,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
39
8
8
9
1
0
3
8
‐AM
B
U
L
A
N
C
E
BI
L
L
I
N
G
16
5
,
5
3
0
15
5
,
0
0
0
15
5
,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
39
9
8
9
1
0
4
1
‐SP
E
C
I
A
L
EV
E
N
T
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
2,
5
9
3
3,
0
0
0
3,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
40
0
GE
N
E
R
A
L
EX
P
E
N
S
E
S
(1
0
,
3
4
6
,
8
1
8
)
2,
2
9
0
,
5
5
5
2,
1
6
1
,
6
6
0
(1
2
8
,
8
9
6
)
‐5.
6
%
40
1
8
7
1
0
0
1
‐CE
R
T
& ME
M
B
E
R
S
H
I
P
3,
1
7
1
5,
5
5
0
7,
3
5
0
1,
8
0
0
32
.
4
%
40
2
8
7
1
0
0
2
‐AD
V
E
R
T
& PU
B
RE
L
A
T
I
O
N
S
15
7
,
3
0
2
13
4
,
7
4
3
15
8
,
7
3
5
23
,
9
9
2
17
.
8
%
40
3
8
7
1
0
0
3
‐PO
S
T
A
G
E
/
F
R
E
I
G
H
T
/
E
X
P
R
E
S
S
NO
C
15
6
,
9
8
9
30
2
,
3
4
3
21
9
,
3
5
8
(8
2
,
9
8
5
)
‐27
.
4
%
C
i
t
y
‐wi
d
e
re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
ba
s
e
d
on actuals trend.
40
4
8
7
1
0
0
4
‐PU
B
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
& DU
E
S
NO
C
20
4
,
1
2
2
21
1
,
8
7
2
20
7
,
7
6
8
(4
,
1
0
4
)
‐1.
9
%
10
(E
X
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
)
\
\
c
n
b
.
l
c
l
\
d
a
t
a
\
U
s
e
r
s
\
F
I
N
\
S
h
a
r
e
d
\
A
d
m
i
n
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
\
R
E
P
O
R
T
S
\
2
0
1
8
\
0
5
1
0
1
8
\
F
Y
18
to
19
Bu
d
g
e
t
Variances for Fin Committee (00000005) FINAL
Re
f
R
o
w
La
b
e
l
s
20
1
7
Ac
t
u
a
l
20
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
20
1
9
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Va
r
i
a
n
c
e
20
1
9
v
20
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
% Ch
a
n
g
e
40
5
8
7
1
0
0
5
‐AL
A
R
M
MO
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G
‐
1,
2
0
0
‐
(1
,
2
0
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
%
40
6
8
7
1
0
0
6
‐UN
I
F
O
R
M
EX
P
E
N
S
E
31
6
,
1
2
5
37
1
,
0
2
1
39
1
,
4
7
0
20
,
4
4
9
5.
5
%
40
7
8
7
1
0
0
7
‐UN
I
F
O
R
M
S
/
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
V
E
GE
A
R
17
6
,
1
1
4
14
0
,
6
4
4
13
9
,
0
5
8
(1
,
5
8
5
)
‐1.
1
%
40
8
8
7
1
0
0
8
‐DI
S
T
1 DI
S
C
R
E
T
I
O
N
A
R
Y
GR
N
T
5,
7
4
9
6,
0
0
0
6,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
40
9
8
7
1
0
0
9
‐DI
S
T
2 DI
S
C
R
E
T
I
O
N
A
R
Y
GR
N
T
3,
5
0
0
6,
0
0
0
6,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
41
0
8
7
1
0
1
0
‐DI
S
T
3 DI
S
C
R
E
T
I
O
N
A
R
Y
GR
N
T
‐
6,
0
0
0
6,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
41
1
8
7
1
0
1
1
‐DI
S
T
4 DI
S
C
R
E
T
I
O
N
A
R
Y
GR
N
T
3,
6
0
0
6,
0
0
0
6,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
41
2
8
7
1
0
1
2
‐DI
S
T
5 DI
S
C
R
E
T
I
O
N
A
R
Y
GR
N
T
4,
0
0
0
6,
0
0
0
6,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
41
3
8
7
1
0
1
3
‐DI
S
T
6 DI
S
C
R
E
T
I
O
N
A
R
Y
GR
N
T
‐
6,
0
0
0
6,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
41
4
8
7
1
0
1
4
‐DI
S
T
7 DI
S
C
R
E
T
I
O
N
A
R
Y
GR
N
T
6,
0
0
0
6,
0
0
0
6,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
41
5
8
7
1
0
1
5
‐TU
I
T
I
O
N
RE
I
M
B
U
R
S
E
M
E
N
T
65
,
8
9
7
98
,
5
0
0
98
,
5
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
41
6
8
7
1
0
1
6
‐CO
N
S
E
R
V
A
N
C
Y
PA
Y
M
E
N
T
‐
‐
‐
‐
41
7
8
7
1
0
1
7
‐SO
F
T
W
A
R
E
LI
C
E
N
S
E
RE
N
E
W
A
L
36
0
,
3
5
4
40
3
,
8
7
5
39
9
,
0
8
0
(4
,
7
9
5
)
‐1.
2
%
41
8
8
7
1
0
1
8
‐HA
R
D
W
A
R
E
MO
N
I
T
O
R
/
P
R
I
N
T
E
R
36
,
5
0
6
58
,
4
1
0
32
,
8
0
0
(2
5
,
6
1
0
)
‐43
.
8
%
B
a
s
e
d
on
IT
re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
41
9
8
7
1
0
1
9
‐NE
T
W
O
R
K
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
35
,
4
0
1
48
,
3
1
6
39
,
3
1
6
(9
,
0
0
0
)
‐18
.
6
%
B
a
s
e
d
on
IT
re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
42
0
8
7
1
0
2
0
‐PC
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
21
4
,
0
4
1
25
4
,
5
1
4
18
8
,
2
7
1
(6
6
,
2
4
4
)
‐26
.
0
%
B
a
s
e
d
on
IT
re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
42
1
8
7
1
0
2
1
‐HA
R
D
W
A
R
E
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
10
,
2
3
2
20
,
0
7
1
15
,
4
5
7
(4
,
6
1
3
)
‐23
.
0
%
B
a
s
e
d
on
IT
re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
42
2
8
7
1
0
2
6
‐SU
R
F
I
N
G
RE
S
E
R
V
E
‐
‐
‐
‐
42
3
8
7
1
0
2
7
‐TE
N
N
I
S
RE
S
E
R
V
E
‐
‐
‐
‐
42
4
8
7
1
0
2
8
‐SA
I
L
I
N
G
RE
S
E
R
V
E
‐
‐
‐
‐
42
5
8
7
1
0
2
9
‐RE
C
FA
C
RE
N
T
A
L
RE
S
E
R
V
E
‐
‐
‐
‐
42
6
8
7
1
0
3
0
‐OA
S
I
S
FA
C
RE
N
T
A
L
RE
S
E
R
V
E
‐
‐
‐
‐
42
7
8
7
1
0
3
1
‐OA
S
I
S
FI
T
N
E
S
S
CT
R
RE
S
E
R
V
E
‐
‐
‐
‐
42
8
8
7
1
0
3
7
‐RE
A
L
PR
P
R
T
Y
AS
S
E
T
MG
T
PR
G
‐
‐
‐
‐
42
9
8
7
1
0
3
9
‐CO
S
T
AP
P
L
I
E
D
AL
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
(1
2
,
3
3
1
,
6
6
1
)
‐
‐
‐
43
0
8
7
1
0
4
0
‐OC
RE
C
O
R
D
I
N
G
EX
P
E
N
S
E
31
8
60
0
60
0
‐
0.
0
%
43
1
8
7
1
0
4
1
‐NB
T
V
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
/
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
‐
15
0
,
0
0
0
17
5
,
0
0
0
25
,
0
0
0
16
.
7
%
43
2
8
7
1
0
4
8
‐IN
V
E
S
T
AD
V
I
S
O
R
RE
P
O
R
T
FE
E
15
0
,
1
1
7
10
,
0
0
0
10
,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
43
3
8
7
1
0
4
9
‐BA
N
K
FE
E
S
54
,
9
6
9
36
,
8
9
6
36
,
8
9
6
‐
0.
0
%
43
4
8
7
1
0
5
0
‐OT
H
E
R
RE
V
AB
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
‐
‐
‐
‐
43
5
8
7
1
0
5
1
‐CR
E
D
I
T
CA
R
D
FE
E
S
5,
0
8
4
‐
‐
‐
43
6
8
7
1
0
5
2
‐OT
H
E
R
MI
S
C
FE
E
S
15
,
2
5
5
‐
‐
‐
43
7
8
7
9
9
9
9
‐PL
A
C
E
H
O
L
D
E
R
OB
J
E
C
T
‐
‐
‐
‐
43
8
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
& RE
P
A
I
R
8,
5
5
9
,
5
4
5
9,
3
8
2
,
2
2
4
9,
2
2
8
,
7
7
8
(1
5
3
,
4
4
6
)
‐1.
6
%
43
9
8
5
1
0
0
1
‐GE
N
E
R
A
T
O
R
MA
I
N
T
& RE
P
A
I
R
10
,
4
9
3
11
,
0
0
0
11
,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
44
0
8
5
1
0
0
6
‐RE
S
I
D
RE
F
U
S
E
CO
L
L
E
C
T
I
O
N
3,
9
0
5
,
6
1
6
4,
1
0
3
,
3
3
8
4,
2
0
2
,
4
4
3
99
,
1
0
5
2.
4
%
44
1
8
5
1
0
0
7
‐AU
T
O
M
O
T
I
V
E
FU
E
L
/
W
A
S
H
57
3
,
8
0
0
86
6
,
8
0
6
86
2
,
2
5
6
(4
,
5
5
0
)
‐0.
5
%
44
2
8
5
1
0
0
8
‐AU
T
O
EX
T
E
R
I
O
R
MA
I
N
T
86
,
2
8
4
55
,
7
6
8
55
,
7
6
8
‐
0.
0
%
44
3
8
5
1
0
0
9
‐CO
L
L
I
S
I
O
N
CO
N
T
I
N
G
N
C
Y
FU
N
D
45
,
3
3
7
40
,
0
0
0
40
,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
44
4
8
5
1
0
1
0
‐MA
I
N
T
& RE
P
A
I
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
78
5
,
6
4
6
1,
0
1
5
,
1
3
7
81
6
,
9
6
9
(1
9
8
,
1
6
8
)
‐19
.
5
%
$
4
5
,
9
0
0
re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
(C
i
t
y
‐wi
d
e
reduction based on trend)
44
5
8
5
1
0
1
1
‐MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
CO
P
I
E
R
S
1,
1
3
8
4,
0
0
0
3,
0
0
0
(1
,
0
0
0
)
‐25
.
0
%
44
6
8
5
1
0
1
2
‐MA
I
N
T
& RE
P
A
I
R
GY
M
‐
‐
‐
‐
44
7
8
5
1
0
1
3
‐PR
I
N
T
E
R
MA
I
N
T
/
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
49
,
8
4
1
10
5
,
7
4
2
66
,
0
8
5
(3
9
,
6
5
7
)
‐37
.
5
%
44
8
8
5
1
0
1
4
‐MA
I
N
T
& RE
P
A
I
R
DA
M
A
G
E
10
1
,
0
4
2
53
,
9
1
4
50
,
0
0
0
(3
,
9
1
4
)
‐7.
3
%
44
9
8
5
1
0
1
5
‐MA
I
N
T
E CO
A
S
T
HI
G
H
W
A
Y
34
,
1
3
8
26
,
8
9
7
26
,
8
9
7
‐
0.
0
%
45
0
8
5
1
0
1
6
‐MA
I
N
T
& RE
P
A
I
R
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
1,
0
8
9
,
5
2
0
1,
3
0
6
,
8
6
0
1,
2
9
3
,
3
7
6
(1
3
,
4
8
4
)
‐1.
0
%
45
1
8
5
1
0
1
7
‐FI
R
E
ST
A
T
I
O
N
1 MA
I
N
T
/
R
E
P
A
I
R
11
,
9
2
1
‐
‐
‐
45
2
8
5
1
0
1
8
‐FI
R
E
ST
A
T
I
O
N
2 MA
I
N
T
/
R
E
P
A
I
R
14
,
8
6
2
‐
‐
‐
45
3
8
5
1
0
1
9
‐FI
R
E
ST
A
T
I
O
N
3 MA
I
N
T
/
R
E
P
A
I
R
8,
7
0
3
‐
‐
‐
45
4
8
5
1
0
2
0
‐FI
R
E
ST
A
T
I
O
N
4 MA
I
N
T
/
R
E
P
A
I
R
10
,
8
9
4
1,
6
9
5
‐
(1
,
6
9
5
)
‐10
0
.
0
%
45
5
8
5
1
0
2
1
‐FI
R
E
ST
A
T
I
O
N
5 MA
I
N
T
/
R
E
P
A
I
R
9,
1
5
4
‐
‐
‐
11
(E
X
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
)
\
\
c
n
b
.
l
c
l
\
d
a
t
a
\
U
s
e
r
s
\
F
I
N
\
S
h
a
r
e
d
\
A
d
m
i
n
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
\
R
E
P
O
R
T
S
\
2
0
1
8
\
0
5
1
0
1
8
\
F
Y
18
to
19
Bu
d
g
e
t
Variances for Fin Committee (00000005) FINAL
Re
f
R
o
w
La
b
e
l
s
20
1
7
Ac
t
u
a
l
20
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
20
1
9
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Va
r
i
a
n
c
e
20
1
9
v
20
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
% Ch
a
n
g
e
45
6
8
5
1
0
2
2
‐FI
R
E
ST
A
T
I
O
N
6 MA
I
N
T
/
R
E
P
A
I
R
3,
6
6
9
‐
‐
‐
45
7
8
5
1
0
2
3
‐FI
R
E
ST
A
T
I
O
N
7 MA
I
N
T
/
R
E
P
A
I
R
7,
2
2
8
‐
‐
‐
45
8
8
5
1
0
2
4
‐FI
R
E
ST
A
T
I
O
N
8 MA
I
N
T
/
R
E
P
A
I
R
17
,
6
2
4
‐
‐
‐
45
9
8
5
1
0
2
5
‐LG
TO
W
E
R
MA
I
N
T
/
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
66
,
0
4
7
65
,
9
3
7
50
,
3
2
5
(1
5
,
6
1
2
)
‐23
.
7
%
46
0
8
5
1
0
2
6
‐LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
MA
I
N
T
‐
4,
2
0
0
‐
(4
,
2
0
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
%
46
1
8
5
1
0
2
7
‐FI
C
U
S
TR
E
E
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
76
,
3
3
6
99
,
8
4
9
99
,
8
4
9
‐
0.
0
%
46
2
8
5
1
0
2
8
‐TR
E
E
RE
F
O
R
E
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
25
0
,
3
5
8
25
0
,
8
4
5
25
0
,
8
4
5
‐
0.
0
%
46
3
8
5
1
0
2
9
‐TR
E
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
/
C
L
A
I
M
S
21
,
6
8
9
46
,
9
1
6
46
,
9
1
6
‐
0.
0
%
46
4
8
5
1
0
3
0
‐TU
R
F
RE
N
O
V
A
T
I
O
N
10
4
,
2
6
2
99
,
3
2
0
95
,
0
0
0
(4
,
3
2
0
)
‐4.
3
%
46
5
8
5
1
0
3
1
‐MA
I
N
T
BB
S
C
41
,
8
4
4
25
,
2
1
0
25
,
2
1
0
‐
0.
0
%
46
6
8
5
1
0
3
7
‐MA
I
N
T
& RE
P
A
I
R
NO
C
74
1
,
0
8
4
58
3
,
6
4
9
69
8
,
3
1
3
11
4
,
6
6
4
19
.
6
%
46
7
8
5
1
0
3
8
‐MA
I
N
T
IR
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
RE
P
A
I
R
87
,
9
1
8
19
4
,
9
9
5
13
7
,
2
8
0
(5
7
,
7
1
5
)
‐29
.
6
%
46
8
8
5
1
0
3
9
‐MA
I
N
T
ST
O
R
M
DR
A
I
N
S
13
6
,
5
3
6
15
5
,
0
7
9
13
5
,
0
0
0
(2
0
,
0
7
9
)
‐12
.
9
%
46
9
8
5
1
0
4
0
‐MA
I
N
T
DR
N
K
N
G
FO
U
RE
P
A
I
R
‐
1,
0
0
0
50
0
(5
0
0
)
‐50
.
0
%
47
0
8
5
1
0
4
2
‐MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
BE
A
C
H
E
S
19
,
8
5
9
20
,
0
0
0
20
,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
47
1
8
5
1
0
4
3
‐MA
I
N
T
BL
D
G
/
P
L
A
Y
G
R
O
U
N
D
EQ
U
I
P
‐
‐
‐
‐
47
2
8
5
1
0
4
4
‐MA
I
N
T
TR
A
F
F
I
C
CO
N
T
R
O
L
1,
9
5
3
10
,
9
0
6
2,
0
0
0
(8
,
9
0
6
)
‐81
.
7
%
47
3
8
5
1
0
4
6
‐MA
I
N
T
CO
M
P
SO
F
T
W
A
R
E
‐
‐
‐
‐
47
4
8
5
1
0
4
7
‐MA
I
N
T
CO
M
P
HA
R
D
W
A
R
E
‐
2,
8
2
2
‐
(2
,
8
2
2
)
‐10
0
.
0
%
47
5
8
5
1
0
4
8
‐BA
C
K
F
L
O
W
MA
I
N
T
& RE
P
A
I
R
‐
‐
‐
‐
47
6
8
5
1
0
6
5
‐NW
P
CO
A
S
T
RE
I
M
B
U
R
S
E
M
E
N
T
60
,
6
2
0
60
,
6
2
0
60
,
6
2
0
‐
0.
0
%
47
7
8
5
1
0
6
6
‐SE
W
E
R
US
E
FE
E
/
P
R
O
P
TA
X
14
0
,
5
6
8
13
1
,
4
7
9
13
1
,
4
7
9
‐
0.
0
%
47
8
8
5
1
0
6
7
‐RE
C
Y
C
L
E
PU
M
P
ST
A
T
I
O
N
MA
I
N
T
‐
‐
‐
‐
47
9
8
5
1
0
6
9
‐DO
N
A
T
E
D
BE
N
C
H
& TR
E
E
PU
R
C
H
A
S
E
S
29
,
0
8
9
30
,
0
0
0
30
,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
48
0
8
5
1
0
7
1
‐EV
CH
A
R
G
I
N
G
ST
A
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
14
,
4
7
2
‐
‐
‐
48
1
8
5
1
0
7
2
‐SE
W
E
R
FE
E
S
:
FI
X
E
D
+ US
E
‐
8,
2
4
0
17
,
6
4
7
9,
4
0
7
11
4
.
2
%
48
2
GR
A
N
T
OP
E
R
A
T
I
N
G
EX
P
E
N
S
E
S
41
1
,
2
0
2
67
5
,
0
5
2
11
5
,
0
0
0
(5
6
0
,
0
5
2
)
‐83
.
0
%
48
3
82
1
0
0
3
‐EV
E
R
Y
15
MI
N
U
T
E
S
GR
A
N
T
‐
‐
‐
‐
48
4
82
1
0
0
4
‐GR
A
N
T
EX
P
E
N
S
E
S
31
,
1
3
8
11
1
,
0
2
4
‐
(1
1
1
,
0
2
4
)
‐10
0
.
0
%
F
i
r
e
‐
Gr
a
n
t
Ex
p
:
Ca
r
r
y
‐fo
r
w
a
r
d
of previous years grants not budgeted
fo
r
FY
19
48
5
82
1
0
0
5
‐EM
P
G
GR
A
N
T
EX
P
E
N
S
E
S
1,
0
7
3
14
,
9
0
7
‐
(1
4
,
9
0
7
)
‐10
0
.
0
%
48
6
82
1
0
0
6
‐CI
T
Y
GR
A
N
T
S
11
2
,
8
0
0
89
,
5
0
0
11
5
,
0
0
0
25
,
5
0
0
28
.
5
%
48
7
82
1
0
0
8
‐ME
D
I
‐CA
L
IG
T
26
6
,
1
9
1
45
9
,
6
2
1
‐
(4
5
9
,
6
2
1
)
‐10
0
.
0
%
F
i
r
e
‐
Me
d
i
C
a
l
IG
T
pr
o
g
r
a
m
:
Program going to Council July 2018,
ex
p
e
c
t
e
d
to
be
$2
3
0
k
fo
r
FY 19
48
8
O&
M
IN
T
E
R
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
PR
E
M
I
U
M
S
9,
1
5
0
,
9
6
3
9,
9
6
5
,
3
2
5
10
,
2
5
7
,
3
3
9
29
2
,
0
1
4
2.
9
%
48
9
8
8
1
0
0
1
‐EQ
U
I
P
MA
I
N
T
IS
F
1,
4
3
8
,
5
3
4
1,
4
2
4
,
9
2
6
1,
4
4
9
,
1
9
8
24
,
2
7
2
1.
7
%
49
0
8
8
1
0
0
2
‐NO
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
33
8
,
7
9
5
37
2
,
5
4
5
37
2
,
5
4
5
‐
0.
0
%
49
1
8
8
1
0
0
3
‐VE
H
I
C
L
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
IS
F
2,
3
1
3
,
0
0
2
2,
3
3
7
,
8
6
1
2,
4
2
9
,
4
4
0
91
,
5
7
9
3.
9
%
49
2
8
8
1
0
0
4
‐IT
IS
F
OP
E
R
A
T
I
N
G
CH
A
R
G
E
3,
6
1
9
,
7
6
4
4,
1
1
8
,
4
6
0
4,
0
3
5
,
3
8
0
(8
3
,
0
8
0
)
‐2.
0
%
49
3
8
8
1
0
0
5
‐IT
IS
F
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
CH
A
R
G
E
87
3
,
2
9
1
1,
1
4
1
,
7
4
0
1,
4
0
0
,
9
8
3
25
9
,
2
4
3
22
.
7
%
I
T
IS
F
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
ch
a
r
g
e
based on new methodology by $259,243
49
4
8
8
1
0
0
6
‐PA
R
K
I
N
G
EQ
U
I
P
CO
N
T
R
I
B
35
4
,
9
5
4
35
4
,
9
5
4
35
4
,
9
5
4
‐
0.
0
%
49
5
8
8
1
0
0
7
‐RS
S
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
IS
F
18
1
,
3
4
8
18
2
,
3
1
4
18
2
,
3
1
4
‐
0.
0
%
49
6
8
8
1
0
0
8
‐RS
S
IN
F
R
A
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
IS
F
31
,
2
7
5
32
,
5
2
5
32
,
5
2
5
‐
0.
0
%
49
7
PA
Y
R
O
L
L
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
EX
P
E
N
S
E
‐
(1
,
7
6
9
)
‐
1,
7
6
9
‐
10
0
.
0
%
49
8
72
9
0
0
1
‐PA
Y
R
O
L
L
AC
C
R
U
A
L
EX
P
E
N
S
E
‐
(1
,
7
6
9
)
‐
1,
7
6
9
‐
10
0
.
0
%
49
9
PE
R
S
O
N
N
E
L
IN
T
E
R
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
PR
E
M
I
U
M
S
4,
8
4
4
,
2
0
2
4,
8
9
1
,
4
0
1
5,
7
7
2
,
6
9
1
88
1
,
2
9
0
18
.
0
%
50
0
72
8
0
0
1
‐WO
R
K
E
R
S
'
CO
M
P
IS
F
MI
S
C
1,
0
3
4
,
0
4
1
1,
0
3
4
,
0
4
1
1,
5
4
1
,
0
8
0
50
7
,
0
3
9
49
.
0
%
W
C
Pr
e
m
i
u
m
s
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
by
$858k
50
1
72
8
0
0
2
‐WO
R
K
E
R
S
'
CO
M
P
IS
F
SA
F
E
T
Y
1,
5
6
4
,
4
0
0
1,
5
6
4
,
4
0
0
1,
9
1
5
,
4
2
4
35
1
,
0
2
4
22
.
4
%
W
C
Pr
e
m
i
u
m
s
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
by
$858k
50
2
72
8
0
0
3
‐CO
M
P
E
N
S
A
T
E
D
AB
S
E
N
C
E
S
2,
2
4
5
,
7
6
1
2,
2
9
2
,
9
6
0
2,
3
1
6
,
1
8
7
23
,
2
2
7
1.
0
%
B
a
s
e
d
on
fu
l
l
‐ti
m
e
em
p
l
o
y
e
e
s
'
base salary (3.5%)
50
3
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
& CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
18
,
3
9
9
,
6
9
0
22
,
8
2
3
,
2
7
5
21
,
6
5
5
,
1
0
6
(1
,
1
6
8
,
1
6
8
)
‐5.
1
%
50
4
8
1
1
0
0
1
‐PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
MA
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
56
6
1,
0
0
0
1,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
12
(E
X
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
)
\
\
c
n
b
.
l
c
l
\
d
a
t
a
\
U
s
e
r
s
\
F
I
N
\
S
h
a
r
e
d
\
A
d
m
i
n
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
\
R
E
P
O
R
T
S
\
2
0
1
8
\
0
5
1
0
1
8
\
F
Y
18
to
19
Bu
d
g
e
t
Variances for Fin Committee (00000005) FINAL
Re
f
R
o
w
La
b
e
l
s
20
1
7
Ac
t
u
a
l
20
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
20
1
9
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Va
r
i
a
n
c
e
20
1
9
v
20
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
% Ch
a
n
g
e
50
5
8
1
1
0
0
2
‐LE
A
S
I
N
G
EX
P
E
N
S
E
S
1,
6
2
0
3,
0
0
0
3,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
50
6
8
1
1
0
0
3
‐TI
T
L
E
SE
A
R
C
H
FE
E
S
1,
5
0
0
10
,
0
0
0
2,
5
0
0
(7
,
5
0
0
)
‐75
.
0
%
50
7
8
1
1
0
0
4
‐EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
RE
N
T
A
L
16
6
,
7
0
0
17
2
,
8
7
7
13
6
,
5
0
2
(3
6
,
3
7
5
)
‐21
.
0
%
$
3
9
,
7
3
0
re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
(C
i
t
y
‐wi
d
e
reduction based on trend)
50
8
8
1
1
0
0
5
‐SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
24
1
,
5
0
3
26
2
,
4
7
6
32
9
,
2
6
6
66
,
7
9
0
25
.
4
%
50
9
8
1
1
0
0
6
‐SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
AC
C
O
U
N
T
I
N
G
29
,
7
6
0
45
,
0
0
0
45
,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
51
0
8
1
1
0
0
7
‐SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
AU
D
I
T
43
,
5
1
0
28
,
7
0
1
50
,
0
0
0
21
,
2
9
9
74
.
2
%
51
1
8
1
1
0
0
8
‐SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
6,
0
5
3
,
5
6
7
7,
9
0
4
,
2
0
8
7,
0
7
5
,
9
3
8
(8
2
8
,
2
7
0
)
‐10
.
5
%
C
D
D
Re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
in
co
n
t
r
a
c
t
building inspectors $284k (PT City EE's
be
i
n
g
hi
r
e
d
)
On
e
‐ti
m
e
av
i
a
t
i
o
n
ex
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
that were funded in FY18 and re ‐
al
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
ou
t
of
Ci
t
y
Co
u
n
c
i
l
$401k)
51
2
8
1
1
0
0
9
‐SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
FU
E
L
MO
D
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
10
9
,
5
0
0
22
5
,
8
1
0
22
5
,
8
1
0
‐
0.
0
%
51
3
8
1
1
0
1
1
‐TM
D
L
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
‐
‐
‐
‐
51
4
8
1
1
0
1
2
‐SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
JA
N
I
T
O
R
I
A
L
83
6
,
9
2
4
83
5
,
8
0
9
84
3
,
8
0
9
8,
0
0
0
1.
0
%
51
5
8
1
1
0
1
3
‐SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
LI
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
‐
‐
‐
‐
51
6
8
1
1
0
1
4
‐SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
NP
T
CO
A
S
T
RE
F
U
S
E
67
6
,
1
5
4
70
0
,
0
0
0
71
9
,
1
4
0
19
,
1
4
0
2.
7
%
51
7
8
1
1
0
1
5
‐SE
R
V
C
E
S
OT
H
E
R
PR
I
N
T
VE
N
D
O
R
17
,
2
5
0
5,
5
0
0
17
,
5
0
0
12
,
0
0
0
21
8
.
2
%
51
8
8
1
1
0
1
6
‐SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
PH
Y
S
I
C
A
L
S
10
2
,
7
0
9
10
3
,
1
8
3
10
3
,
1
8
3
‐
0.
0
%
51
9
8
1
1
0
1
7
‐SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
55
4
,
1
0
6
79
4
,
6
7
6
81
5
,
9
6
5
21
,
2
8
9
2.
7
%
52
0
8
1
1
0
1
8
‐CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
ME
D
I
A
N
S
1,
6
2
9
,
8
1
1
1,
6
5
4
,
4
9
0
1,
6
9
2
,
6
9
9
38
,
2
0
9
2.
3
%
52
1
8
1
1
0
1
9
‐CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
NP
T
CO
A
S
T
‐
‐
‐
‐
52
2
8
1
1
0
2
0
‐CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
PA
R
K
/
F
A
C
I
L
T
Y
1,
8
4
0
,
3
7
7
2,
2
3
4
,
3
9
3
2,
4
3
7
,
1
2
4
20
2
,
7
3
1
9.
1
%
M
a
r
i
p
o
s
a
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
co
n
t
r
a
c
t
increase
52
3
8
1
1
0
2
1
‐CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
ST
R
T
SW
P
I
N
G
43
4
,
1
6
5
49
8
,
3
9
8
50
1
,
7
8
5
3,
3
8
7
0.
7
%
52
4
8
1
1
0
2
2
‐CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
AL
L
E
Y
SW
E
E
P
53
,
4
1
6
77
,
7
9
8
79
,
0
0
2
1,
2
0
4
1.
5
%
52
5
8
1
1
0
2
3
‐CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
BE
A
C
H
RE
F
U
S
E
14
7
,
3
4
4
16
8
,
7
8
3
16
8
,
7
8
3
‐
0.
0
%
52
6
8
1
1
0
2
4
‐CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
ST
O
R
M
DR
A
I
N
S
15
8
,
3
8
3
20
4
,
5
3
0
20
7
,
8
4
4
3,
3
1
4
1.
6
%
52
7
8
1
1
0
2
5
‐CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
HE
L
I
C
O
P
T
E
R
50
9
,
8
8
0
70
0
,
0
0
0
70
0
,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
52
8
8
1
1
0
2
6
‐CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
CI
V
I
C
CE
N
T
E
R
17
7
,
3
9
0
20
3
,
1
6
0
20
5
,
6
6
2
2,
5
0
2
1.
2
%
52
9
8
1
1
0
2
7
‐SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
CI
T
Y
PR
I
N
T
CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
59
,
4
1
1
93
,
4
6
9
78
,
4
1
7
(1
5
,
0
5
2
)
‐16
.
1
%
53
0
8
1
1
0
2
8
‐SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
EL
E
C
T
R
O
N
I
C
RE
P
O
R
T
I
N
G
‐
‐
‐
‐
53
1
8
1
1
0
3
0
‐PA
R
K
I
N
G
ME
T
E
R
CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
1,
2
1
9
,
9
4
9
1,
8
4
8
,
5
0
5
1,
4
9
1
,
0
4
4
(3
5
7
,
4
6
1
)
‐19
.
3
%
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
‐
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Me
t
e
r
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
(prior year encumbrance carry ‐
fo
r
w
a
r
d
)
53
2
8
1
1
0
3
1
‐BE
A
C
H
TR
A
S
H
C
A
N
CO
L
L
E
C
T
I
O
N
18
9
,
9
9
2
19
7
,
0
0
0
19
8
,
8
1
2
1,
8
1
2
0.
9
%
53
3
8
1
1
0
3
2
‐ST
E
A
M
CL
E
A
N
I
N
G
23
1
,
5
5
6
30
5
,
6
0
6
24
4
,
0
3
6
(6
1
,
5
7
0
)
‐20
.
1
%
53
4
8
1
1
0
3
4
‐CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
ST
R
I
P
I
N
G
13
2
,
4
9
5
13
5
,
0
0
0
13
6
,
0
8
8
1,
0
8
8
0.
8
%
53
5
8
1
1
0
3
5
‐CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
CO
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T
S
4,
3
2
0
20
,
8
5
8
6,
1
0
8
(1
4
,
7
5
0
)
‐70
.
7
%
53
6
8
1
1
0
3
6
‐CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
RS
S
IN
S
T
R
U
C
T
O
R
S
2,
3
9
4
,
1
3
3
1,
9
4
1
,
0
6
0
1,
6
7
9
,
0
6
0
(2
6
2
,
0
0
0
)
‐13
.
5
%
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
in
co
n
t
r
a
c
t
se
r
v
i
c
e
classes; corresponding revenue
re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
53
7
8
1
1
0
3
8
‐OT
H
E
R
SV
C
S
PR
O
TE
C
H
‐
‐
‐
‐
53
8
8
1
1
0
3
9
‐CY
C
CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
RS
S
IN
S
T
R
U
C
T
O
R
S
‐
‐
‐
‐
53
9
8
1
1
0
4
1
‐RE
A
L
ES
T
A
T
E
BR
O
K
E
R
FE
E
S
‐
‐
‐
‐
54
0
8
1
1
0
4
2
‐PL
A
N
CH
E
C
K
VC
A
18
,
9
0
6
50
,
0
0
0
10
,
0
0
0
(4
0
,
0
0
0
)
‐80
.
0
%
54
1
8
1
1
0
4
3
‐PL
A
N
CH
E
C
K
JA
S
12
,
7
7
5
50
,
0
0
0
10
,
0
0
0
(4
0
,
0
0
0
)
‐80
.
0
%
54
2
8
1
1
0
4
6
‐TI
D
E
L
A
N
D
S
IN
S
T
R
U
C
T
PY
M
T
S
13
9
,
8
1
0
25
5
,
0
0
0
43
5
,
8
5
5
18
0
,
8
5
5
70
.
9
%
L
i
d
o
Ho
u
s
e
fu
n
d
i
n
g
vi
a
Co
a
s
t
a
l
Commission in lieu of subsidizing low
in
c
o
m
e
ho
u
s
i
n
g
54
3
8
1
1
0
4
7
‐AN
I
M
A
L
SH
E
L
T
E
R
CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
S
12
3
,
1
9
7
11
1
,
8
1
9
14
6
,
3
3
0
34
,
5
1
1
30
.
9
%
54
4
8
1
1
0
4
8
‐RE
C
O
R
D
S
MA
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
S
67
,
0
1
1
10
5
,
5
8
4
66
,
0
0
0
(3
9
,
5
8
4
)
‐37
.
5
%
54
5
8
1
1
0
5
0
‐TE
N
N
I
S
CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
IN
S
T
R
U
C
T
O
R
S
‐
47
,
0
0
0
44
,
0
0
0
(3
,
0
0
0
)
‐6.
4
%
54
6
8
1
1
0
5
1
‐SU
R
F
CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
IN
S
T
R
U
C
T
O
R
S
‐
56
6
,
3
3
5
56
6
,
3
3
5
‐
0.
0
%
54
7
8
1
1
0
5
3
‐RE
N
T
A
L
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
‐
81
,
5
1
0
81
,
5
1
0
‐
0.
0
%
13
(E
X
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
)
\
\
c
n
b
.
l
c
l
\
d
a
t
a
\
U
s
e
r
s
\
F
I
N
\
S
h
a
r
e
d
\
A
d
m
i
n
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
\
R
E
P
O
R
T
S
\
2
0
1
8
\
0
5
1
0
1
8
\
F
Y
18
to
19
Bu
d
g
e
t
Variances for Fin Committee (00000005) FINAL
Re
f
R
o
w
La
b
e
l
s
20
1
7
Ac
t
u
a
l
20
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
20
1
9
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Va
r
i
a
n
c
e
20
1
9
v
20
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
% Ch
a
n
g
e
54
8
8
1
1
0
5
4
‐CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
AR
T
S
20
,
0
0
0
18
0
,
7
3
6
10
0
,
0
0
0
(8
0
,
7
3
6
)
‐44
.
7
%
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
fo
r
Sc
u
l
p
t
u
r
e
Ga
r
d
e
n
(Cultural Arts budget). Artists &
Ar
t
s
OC
ar
e
pa
i
d
pa
r
t
l
y
up
front and partly at end of exhibit (2 yr
cy
c
l
e
)
54
9
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
& MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
5,
3
5
2
,
1
6
5
6,
0
7
9
,
8
0
1
5,
2
8
3
,
6
7
6
(7
9
6
,
1
2
5
)
‐13
.
1
%
55
0
8
4
1
0
0
1
‐ST
E
P
UP
PR
G
M
(P
D
)
41
7
‐
‐
‐
55
1
8
4
1
0
0
2
‐VO
L
U
N
T
E
E
R
PR
O
G
R
A
M
S
22
1,
5
0
0
1,
5
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
55
2
8
4
1
0
0
3
‐FI
R
E
EX
P
L
O
R
E
R
PR
O
G
R
A
M
3,
8
9
4
5,
0
0
0
5,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
55
3
8
4
1
0
0
4
‐PR
O
G
R
A
M
M
I
N
G
16
4
,
7
4
1
27
1
,
0
7
2
66
,
0
0
0
(2
0
5
,
0
7
2
)
‐75
.
7
%
F
r
i
e
n
d
s
of
th
e
Li
b
r
a
r
y
& NB
Library Foundation donations for FY 18
55
4
8
4
1
0
0
5
‐EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
RE
C
O
G
N
I
T
I
O
N
11
,
3
3
7
16
,
4
5
8
15
,
0
0
0
(1
,
4
5
8
)
‐8.
9
%
55
5
8
4
1
0
0
6
‐OF
F
I
C
E
SU
P
P
L
Y
CI
T
Y
PR
I
N
T
I
N
G
14
0
,
6
1
9
17
4
,
8
6
0
17
4
,
8
6
0
‐
0.
0
%
55
6
8
4
1
0
0
7
‐SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
OF
F
I
C
E
NO
C
18
6
,
1
6
1
27
0
,
1
9
4
25
6
,
0
8
5
(1
4
,
1
0
9
)
‐5.
2
%
55
7
8
4
1
0
0
8
‐SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
CO
M
P
SO
F
T
W
A
R
E
7,
4
3
2
5,
5
0
0
5,
5
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
55
8
8
4
1
0
0
9
‐OF
F
I
C
E
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
CH
I
L
D
PR
O
G
R
A
M
2,
2
7
9
2,
4
2
0
2,
3
5
0
(7
0
)
‐2.
9
%
55
9
8
4
1
0
1
0
‐SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
CO
P
Y
MA
C
H
I
N
E
23
,
1
7
6
26
,
1
2
6
27
,
0
7
0
94
4
3.
6
%
56
0
8
4
1
0
1
1
‐SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
AU
T
O
PA
R
T
S
EX
P
E
N
S
E
75
,
3
9
3
78
,
0
5
0
91
,
9
9
5
13
,
9
4
6
17
.
9
%
56
1
8
4
1
0
1
2
‐SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
CH
E
C
K
S
/
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
S
/
F
O
R
M
S
10
,
9
8
9
20
,
0
5
0
16
,
8
5
0
(3
,
2
0
0
)
‐16
.
0
%
56
2
8
4
1
0
1
4
‐SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
JA
N
I
T
O
R
I
A
L
NO
C
20
5
,
5
7
6
22
1
,
7
7
8
22
0
,
7
7
8
(1
,
0
0
0
)
‐0.
5
%
56
3
8
4
1
0
1
5
‐SP
E
C
I
A
L
DE
P
T
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
NO
C
88
7
,
1
9
2
83
2
,
9
8
1
72
0
,
1
6
4
(1
1
2
,
8
1
6
)
‐13
.
5
%
F
r
i
e
n
d
s
of
th
e
Li
b
r
a
r
y
& NB
Library Foundation donations for FY 18
56
4
8
4
1
0
1
6
‐CE
R
T
PR
O
G
R
A
M
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
31
,
6
6
7
20
,
0
0
0
20
,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
56
5
8
4
1
0
1
7
‐JR
FI
R
E
F
I
G
H
T
E
R
CA
M
P
SU
P
P
‐
‐
‐
‐
56
6
8
4
1
0
2
0
‐PR
I
S
I
O
N
E
R
CU
S
T
O
D
Y
EX
P
E
N
S
E
46
,
4
3
8
42
,
5
0
0
42
,
5
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
56
7
8
4
1
0
2
1
‐SU
R
F
I
N
G
CL
A
S
S
EX
P
E
N
S
E
S
‐
‐
‐
‐
56
8
8
4
1
0
2
2
‐PH
O
T
O
EX
P
E
N
S
E
30
2
3,
5
0
0
3,
5
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
56
9
8
4
1
0
2
3
‐SH
O
O
T
I
N
G
RA
N
G
E
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
73
,
8
8
7
62
,
8
0
0
62
,
8
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
57
0
8
4
1
0
2
4
‐S.
W
.
A
.
T
.
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
37
,
3
8
4
67
,
6
5
8
51
,
6
2
3
(1
6
,
0
3
5
)
‐23
.
7
%
57
1
8
4
1
0
2
5
‐CA
N
I
N
E
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
10
,
4
3
0
12
,
5
9
0
12
,
5
9
0
‐
0.
0
%
57
2
8
4
1
0
2
6
‐ST
R
E
E
T
CL
E
A
N
I
N
G
EX
P
E
N
S
E
2,
9
2
9
5,
0
0
0
5,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
57
3
8
4
1
0
2
7
‐CA
R
P
E
N
T
E
R
SH
O
P
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
‐
‐
‐
‐
57
4
8
4
1
0
2
8
‐PI
E
R
/
F
L
O
A
T
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
15
,
3
2
7
20
,
0
0
0
20
,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
57
5
8
4
1
0
2
9
‐SA
F
E
T
Y
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
3,
3
7
3
2,
7
5
0
2,
5
0
0
(2
5
0
)
‐9.
1
%
57
6
8
4
1
0
3
0
‐CE
R
T
EN
D
O
W
M
E
N
T
‐
‐
‐
‐
57
7
8
4
1
0
3
1
‐SI
G
N
SH
O
P
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
‐
‐
‐
‐
57
8
8
4
1
0
3
2
‐TR
A
F
F
I
C
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
7,
4
1
0
12
,
0
0
0
12
,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
57
9
8
4
1
0
3
3
‐RO
A
D
W
A
Y
PA
I
N
T
S
& BA
R
S
10
,
7
2
3
7,
0
0
0
7,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
58
0
8
4
1
0
3
4
‐DE
V
I
C
E
PA
I
N
T
S
69
9
70
0
70
0
‐
0.
0
%
58
1
8
4
1
0
3
5
‐SI
G
N
S
48
,
4
2
5
47
,
0
0
0
47
,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
58
2
8
4
1
0
3
6
‐SI
G
N
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
‐
‐
‐
‐
58
3
8
4
1
0
3
7
‐SI
G
N
IN
S
T
A
L
L
A
T
I
O
N
MA
T
R
L
S
‐
‐
‐
‐
58
4
8
4
1
0
3
8
‐IN
S
C
T
C
D
E
S
/
H
R
B
C
D
E
S
/
F
N
G
C
D
E
S
5,
5
4
2
3,
0
0
0
3,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
58
5
8
4
1
0
3
9
‐PL
A
N
T
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
19
,
8
7
0
16
,
0
0
0
20
,
0
0
0
4,
0
0
0
25
.
0
%
58
6
8
4
1
0
4
0
‐FE
R
T
I
L
I
Z
E
R
3,
1
7
9
2,
0
0
0
5,
0
0
0
3,
0
0
0
15
0
.
0
%
58
7
8
4
1
0
4
1
‐TO
P
SO
I
L
/
A
M
E
N
D
M
E
N
T
S
10
,
0
4
1
7,
5
0
0
7,
5
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
58
8
8
4
1
0
4
2
‐AS
P
H
A
L
T
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
16
3
,
2
9
7
18
2
,
2
3
9
17
7
,
4
5
8
(4
,
7
8
1
)
‐2.
6
%
58
9
8
4
1
0
4
3
‐CO
N
C
R
E
T
E
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
12
5
,
3
8
3
17
2
,
5
5
0
17
0
,
0
0
0
(2
,
5
5
0
)
‐1.
5
%
59
0
8
4
1
0
4
4
‐TO
O
L
S
IN
S
T
R
U
M
E
N
T
S
ET
C
27
,
3
3
5
43
,
5
0
0
44
,
0
0
0
50
0
1.
1
%
59
1
8
4
1
0
4
5
‐CI
V
I
C
CT
R
ST
A
R
T
UP
CO
S
T
S
‐
‐
‐
‐
59
2
8
4
1
0
4
6
‐SP
E
C
I
A
L
DE
P
T
EX
P
E
N
S
E
NO
C
1,
0
6
1
,
2
0
0
1,
0
0
4
,
1
7
1
94
4
,
4
7
7
(5
9
,
6
9
4
)
‐5.
9
%
59
3
8
4
1
0
4
9
‐II
I
PR
O
G
R
A
M
2,
7
5
7
3,
0
0
0
5,
0
0
0
2,
0
0
0
66
.
7
%
59
4
8
4
1
0
5
1
‐WE
L
L
N
E
S
S
PR
O
G
R
A
M
3,
2
0
6
10
,
0
0
0
17
,
0
0
0
7,
0
0
0
70
.
0
%
59
5
8
4
1
0
5
2
‐LI
B
R
A
R
Y
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
85
6
,
6
4
5
1,
0
2
1
,
5
3
1
62
3
,
5
4
0
(3
9
7
,
9
9
1
)
‐39
.
0
%
F
r
i
e
n
d
s
of
th
e
Li
b
r
a
r
y
& NB
Library Foundation donations for FY 18
59
6
8
4
1
0
5
3
‐LI
B
MA
T
R
L
S
ON
L
I
N
E
RE
F
R
N
C
E
24
,
0
8
4
26
,
0
0
0
26
,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
14
(E
X
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
)
\
\
c
n
b
.
l
c
l
\
d
a
t
a
\
U
s
e
r
s
\
F
I
N
\
S
h
a
r
e
d
\
A
d
m
i
n
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
\
R
E
P
O
R
T
S
\
2
0
1
8
\
0
5
1
0
1
8
\
F
Y
18
to
19
Bu
d
g
e
t
Variances for Fin Committee (00000005) FINAL
Re
f
R
o
w
La
b
e
l
s
20
1
7
Ac
t
u
a
l
20
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
20
1
9
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Va
r
i
a
n
c
e
20
1
9
v
20
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
% Ch
a
n
g
e
59
7
8
4
1
0
5
4
‐FI
R
E
W
O
R
K
S
40
,
0
0
0
41
,
0
0
0
50
,
0
0
0
9,
0
0
0
22
.
0
%
59
8
8
4
1
0
5
5
‐HA
Z
A
R
D
MI
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
17
9
,
0
0
2
18
1
,
5
8
6
18
1
,
9
6
7
38
1
0.
2
%
59
9
8
4
1
0
5
9
‐RE
C
L
A
I
M
E
D
WA
T
E
R
EX
P
OC
W
D
‐
‐
‐
‐
60
0
8
4
1
0
6
0
‐OT
H
E
R
AG
E
N
C
Y
FE
E
S
74
0
,
1
4
4
80
5
,
2
7
9
79
8
,
0
7
9
(7
,
2
0
0
)
‐0.
9
%
60
1
8
4
1
0
6
2
‐ST
A
T
I
O
N
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
14
,
6
9
7
35
,
9
5
9
35
,
9
5
9
‐
0.
0
%
60
2
8
4
1
0
6
3
‐WA
T
E
R
CN
S
R
V
AC
T
I
V
I
T
I
E
S
‐
‐
‐
‐
60
3
8
4
1
0
6
4
‐CD
D
BO
A
R
D
S
& CO
M
M
I
T
T
E
E
S
17
,
0
4
3
18
,
2
8
0
18
,
2
8
0
‐
0.
0
%
60
4
8
4
1
0
6
5
‐CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SU
P
P
L
Y
ME
M
O
R
Y
/
H
D
13
,
7
9
1
34
,
6
6
9
24
,
0
0
0
(1
0
,
6
6
9
)
‐30
.
8
%
B
a
s
e
d
on
IT
re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
60
5
8
4
1
0
6
6
‐CE
N
T
R
A
L
WH
S
E
AD
J
U
S
T
M
E
N
T
S
‐
‐
‐
‐
60
6
8
4
1
0
6
7
‐CO
U
N
T
E
R
SA
L
E
S
WH
S
E
ST
C
K
37
9
‐
‐
‐
60
7
8
4
1
0
7
0
‐AN
I
M
A
L
SH
E
L
T
E
R
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
10
,
7
8
6
7,
0
0
0
7,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
60
8
8
4
1
0
7
1
‐HO
M
E
L
E
S
S
AS
S
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
75
2
5,
0
0
0
5,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
60
9
8
4
1
0
7
2
‐JR
LIF
E
G
U
A
R
D
PR
E
P
A
I
D
EX
P
E
N
S
E
S
3,
8
3
1
‐
‐
‐
61
0
8
4
1
0
7
4
‐FI
R
E
IN
V
E
S
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
S
5,
9
9
1
15
,
0
0
0
15
,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
61
1
8
4
1
0
7
5
‐UR
B
A
N
SE
A
R
C
H
& RE
S
C
U
E
14
,
9
8
9
‐
‐
‐
61
2
8
4
1
0
7
6
‐BA
C
K
BA
Y
SC
I
E
N
C
E
CE
N
T
E
R
M&
O
EX
‐
80
0
80
0
‐
0.
0
%
61
3
8
4
1
0
7
7
‐DI
S
P
O
S
A
B
L
E
ME
D
I
C
A
L
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
‐
21
4
,
2
5
0
21
4
,
2
5
0
‐
0.
0
%
61
4
TR
A
V
E
L
& TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
78
4
,
1
1
8
93
6
,
8
6
2
89
4
,
9
5
0
(4
1
,
9
1
2
)
‐4.
5
%
61
5
8
6
1
0
0
1
‐TR
A
V
E
L
& ME
E
T
I
N
G
S
NO
C
21
6
,
7
5
4
21
6
,
1
3
2
20
4
,
5
5
5
(1
1
,
5
7
7
)
‐5.
4
%
61
6
8
6
1
0
0
2
‐TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
/
E
D
U
C
A
T
I
O
N
67
,
8
2
2
11
4
,
0
0
1
95
,
0
0
0
(1
9
,
0
0
1
)
‐16
.
7
%
61
7
8
6
1
0
0
3
‐TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
27
2
,
8
9
5
36
9
,
9
1
4
35
8
,
5
8
0
(1
1
,
3
3
4
)
‐3.
1
%
61
8
8
6
1
0
0
4
‐TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
PO
S
T
12
8
,
4
3
1
13
6
,
9
9
1
13
6
,
9
9
1
‐
0.
0
%
61
9
8
6
1
0
0
5
‐TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
CI
T
Y
WI
D
E
83
,
7
0
6
85
,
5
1
4
85
,
5
1
4
‐
0.
0
%
62
0
8
6
1
0
0
6
‐TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
CE
R
T
7,
3
1
4
8,
0
0
0
8,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
62
1
8
6
1
0
0
7
‐ST
A
N
D
R
D
S
FO
R
TR
N
I
N
G
& CO
R
R
T
N
7,
1
9
6
6,
3
1
0
6,
3
1
0
‐
0.
0
%
62
2
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
2,
4
2
3
,
3
9
8
3,
1
8
3
,
0
4
5
3,
0
2
2
,
4
5
0
(1
6
0
,
5
9
5
)
‐5.
0
%
62
3
8
3
1
0
0
1
‐TE
L
E
C
O
M
M
DA
T
A
L
I
N
E
S
21
6
,
1
8
0
26
1
,
6
5
3
23
9
,
0
3
1
(2
2
,
6
2
2
)
‐8.
6
%
C
i
t
y
‐wi
d
e
re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
ba
s
e
d
on actuals trend.
62
4
8
3
1
0
0
2
‐UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
TE
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
86
,
8
0
5
12
2
,
9
4
1
12
0
,
9
4
1
(2
,
0
0
0
)
‐1.
6
%
62
5
8
3
1
0
0
3
‐UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
NA
T
U
R
A
L
GA
S
46
,
2
6
5
50
,
9
6
5
42
,
3
7
0
(8
,
5
9
5
)
‐16
.
9
%
62
6
8
3
1
0
0
4
‐UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
EL
E
C
T
R
I
C
I
T
Y
1,
3
1
6
,
8
3
8
1,
6
0
2
,
5
8
3
1,
5
2
9
,
6
3
1
(7
2
,
9
5
2
)
‐4.
6
%
C
i
t
y
‐wi
d
e
re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
ba
s
e
d
on actuals trend.
62
7
8
3
1
0
0
5
‐UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
WA
T
E
R
75
6
,
7
5
2
1,
1
4
3
,
9
0
3
1,
0
8
9
,
4
7
7
(5
4
,
4
2
6
)
‐4.
8
%
C
i
t
y
‐wi
d
e
re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
ba
s
e
d
on actuals trend.
62
8
8
3
1
0
0
6
‐UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
EL
E
C
T
R
I
C
VE
H
I
C
L
E
PR
O
‐
‐
‐
‐
62
9
8
3
1
0
0
8
‐UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
SA
I
L
I
N
G
CT
R
TID
E
L
A
N
D
55
7
1,
0
0
0
1,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
63
0
CA
P
I
T
A
L
OU
T
L
A
Y
78
0
,
9
5
2
1,
0
1
1
,
2
5
1
78
4
,
3
2
0
(2
2
6
,
9
3
1
)
‐22
.
4
%
63
1
9
1
1
0
0
1
‐OF
F
I
C
E
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
20
,
0
5
3
30
,
2
7
7
21
,
6
0
0
(8
,
6
7
7
)
‐28
.
7
%
63
2
9
1
1
0
0
3
‐SO
F
T
W
A
R
E
LI
C
E
N
S
E
S
5,
0
0
0
‐
‐
‐
63
3
9
1
1
0
0
4
‐CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
28
,
4
5
5
63
,
1
0
0
45
,
7
7
0
(1
7
,
3
3
0
)
‐27
.
5
%
63
4
9
1
1
0
0
5
‐CO
P
I
E
R
PU
R
C
H
A
S
E
S
‐
‐
‐
‐
63
5
9
1
1
0
0
6
‐FI
T
N
E
S
S
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
26
,
9
0
4
55
,
0
4
0
45
,
2
9
8
(9
,
7
4
2
)
‐17
.
7
%
63
6
9
1
1
0
0
7
‐PL
A
Y
G
R
O
U
N
D
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
‐
‐
‐
‐
63
7
9
1
1
0
0
8
‐PA
R
K
RE
N
O
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
31
6
,
6
4
9
30
7
,
0
0
0
30
7
,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
63
8
9
1
1
0
1
1
‐FY
1
5
CO
M
M
RO
O
M
UP
G
R
A
D
E
S
‐
‐
‐
‐
63
9
9
1
1
0
1
3
‐AS
S
I
S
T
FF
GR
A
N
T
SC
B
A
EQ
U
I
P
‐
‐
‐
‐
64
0
9
1
1
0
1
5
‐PA
R
K
I
N
G
LO
T
IN
F
R
A
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
‐
‐
‐
‐
64
1
9
1
1
0
2
4
‐EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
N.
O
.
C
.
34
4
,
8
6
0
44
5
,
2
9
5
32
5
,
6
4
1
(1
1
9
,
6
5
4
)
‐26
.
9
%
F
i
r
e
‐
En
c
u
m
b
r
a
n
c
e
Ca
r
r
y
‐forward on contract; MOD ‐ CO purchases
fo
r
St
o
r
m
Dr
a
i
n
s
,
Fa
c
Ma
i
n
t
FY18 only
64
2
9
1
1
0
2
5
‐NE
W
PC
PU
R
C
H
A
S
E
S
‐
14
,
4
6
2
‐
(1
4
,
4
6
2
)
‐10
0
.
0
%
O
n
e
‐ti
m
e
pu
r
c
h
a
s
e
s
in
FY
18
64
3
9
1
1
0
2
7
‐SO
F
T
W
A
R
E
LI
C
E
N
S
E
NE
W
20
,
0
5
5
7,
3
5
4
1,
0
0
0
(6
,
3
5
4
)
‐86
.
4
%
64
4
9
1
1
0
3
9
‐OF
F
I
C
E
FU
R
N
I
T
U
R
E
/
F
I
X
T
U
R
E
S
17
,
0
6
8
68
,
7
2
3
18
,
0
1
2
(5
0
,
7
1
2
)
‐73
.
8
%
N
B
Li
b
r
a
r
y
& pr
i
o
r
ye
a
r
do
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
not budgeted in FY 19
64
5
9
1
1
0
4
8
‐BA
C
K
BA
Y
SC
I
E
N
C
E
CE
N
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
‐
‐
‐
‐
64
6
9
1
1
0
5
5
‐PE
G
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
1,
9
0
9
20
,
0
0
0
20
,
0
0
0
‐
0.
0
%
15
(E
X
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
)
\
\
c
n
b
.
l
c
l
\
d
a
t
a
\
U
s
e
r
s
\
F
I
N
\
S
h
a
r
e
d
\
A
d
m
i
n
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
\
R
E
P
O
R
T
S
\
2
0
1
8
\
0
5
1
0
1
8
\
F
Y
18
to
19
Bu
d
g
e
t
Variances for Fin Committee (00000005) FINAL
Re
f
R
o
w
La
b
e
l
s
20
1
7
Ac
t
u
a
l
20
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
Bu
d
g
e
t
20
1
9
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Va
r
i
a
n
c
e
20
1
9
v
20
1
8
Re
v
i
s
e
d
% Ch
a
n
g
e
64
7
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
‐
‐
‐
‐
64
8
9
2
1
0
0
3
‐IN
T
E
R
E
S
T
EX
P
E
N
S
E
‐
‐
‐
‐
64
9
9
2
1
0
0
4
‐PR
I
N
C
I
P
A
L
EX
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
‐
‐
‐
‐
65
0
TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
S
28
,
3
5
2
,
3
0
5
22
,
1
6
0
,
5
2
0
‐
(2
2
,
1
6
0
,
5
2
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
%
65
1
9
9
1
0
0
1
‐TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
OU
T
‐
‐
‐
‐
65
2
9
9
1
0
1
2
‐TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
OU
T
CI
P
FU
N
D
6,
3
5
0
,
0
0
0
5,
7
6
0
,
5
2
0
‐
(5
,
7
6
0
,
5
2
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
%
65
3
9
9
1
1
0
0
‐TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
OU
T
TI
D
E
L
A
N
D
FU
N
D
6,
7
6
2
,
8
0
5
‐
‐
‐
65
4
9
9
1
1
0
1
‐TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
OU
T
TI
D
E
L
A
N
D
HA
R
B
R
CA
‐
6,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
‐
(6
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
%
65
5
9
9
1
1
2
3
‐TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
OU
T
ME
A
S
U
R
E
M CO
M
P
‐
‐
‐
‐
65
6
9
9
1
1
3
5
‐TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
OU
T
CO
N
T
R
I
B
U
T
I
O
N
S
‐
‐
‐
‐
65
7
9
9
1
1
3
8
‐TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
OU
T
EN
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
L
CO
N
T
‐
‐
‐
‐
65
8
9
9
1
1
6
4
‐TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
OU
T
Fi
i
N
FU
N
D
‐
‐
‐
‐
65
9
9
9
1
5
1
3
‐TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
OU
T
FF
P
8,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
8,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
‐
(8
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
%
66
0
9
9
1
5
3
6
‐TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
OU
T
NB
R
EN
H
A
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
1,
7
3
9
,
5
0
0
40
0
,
0
0
0
‐
(4
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
%
66
1
9
9
1
5
6
3
‐TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
OU
T
MI
S
C
SA
H
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
‐
‐
‐
‐
66
2
9
9
1
5
7
1
‐TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
OU
T
FA
C
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
MA
I
N
T
1,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
1,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
‐
(1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
%
66
3
9
9
1
7
1
1
‐TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
OU
T
SE
W
E
R
EN
T
E
R
P
R
I
S
E
3,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
‐
‐
‐
66
4
9
9
1
7
5
1
‐TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
OU
T
GE
N
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
FU
N
‐
‐
‐
‐
66
5
9
9
1
7
5
4
‐TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
OU
T
80
0
MH
Z
RA
D
I
O
50
0
,
0
0
0
50
0
,
0
0
0
‐
(5
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
%
66
6
9
9
1
7
5
7
‐TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
OU
T
RS
S
EQ
U
I
P
‐
‐
‐
‐
66
7
9
9
1
7
6
4
‐TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
OU
T
IT
IS
F
‐
‐
‐
‐
66
8
9
9
1
7
6
5
‐TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
OU
T
IT
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
‐
‐
‐
‐
66
9
Gr
a
n
d
To
t
a
l
19
7
,
2
9
2
,
5
0
3
22
8
,
9
4
3
,
1
2
6
20
8
,
3
7
2
,
5
9
8
(2
0
,
5
7
0
,
5
2
8
)
‐9.
0
%
16
(E
X
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
)
\
\
c
n
b
.
l
c
l
\
d
a
t
a
\
U
s
e
r
s
\
F
I
N
\
S
h
a
r
e
d
\
A
d
m
i
n
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
\
R
E
P
O
R
T
S
\
2
0
1
8
\
0
5
1
0
1
8
\
F
Y
18
to
19
Bu
d
g
e
t
Variances for Fin Committee (00000005) FINAL
1
FY 2018‐19 PROPOSED BUDGET
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH FINANCE COMMITTEE
MAY 10, 2018 1www.newportbeachca.gov/openbudget
Questions Raised at April 12, 2018
Finance Committee Meeting
Composition of Pension Plan Participants –Benefit Tiers
Workers Compensation and General Liability Increases
Other Questions From Review of Budget Documents
Item No. 5A2
Finance Committee Budget Review
Additional Materials Received
May 10, 2018
5/14/2018
2
Composition of Pension Plan Participants
as Budgeted 2018‐19
74%
9%
17%
ALL PERS TIERS
Tier 1 Classic ‐ 539 Tier 2 Transfers‐ 68
Tier 3 PEPRA ‐ 119*
*16 Vacant Positions
Pension Tier Trend
Miscellaneous Plan Actives Budgeted Annualized
2013 2014 2015 2016 2019 Rate of Change
Classic 494 455 426 409 345 ‐5.8%
Tier 2 2 10 19 22 34 60.1%
PEPRA 8 32 65 86 119 56.8%
Total 504 497 510 517 498 ‐0.2%
Safety Plan Actives Budgeted Annualized
2013 2014 2015 2016 2019 Rate of Change
Classic 249 242 233 220 209 ‐2.8%
Tier 2 16 18 23 24 39 16.0%
PEPRA 1 9 13 20 33 79.3%
Total 266 269 269 264 282 1.0%
5/14/2018
3
Insurance Reserve Trend
General Liability
Workers’ Compensation
10 Year Cash Balance History
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Worker's Compensation 12,622,990 13,893,791 14,009,180 16,291,908 16,641,614 18,003,468 17,726,491 16,070,716 15,925,166 15,560,004
General Liability 6,163,525 6,688,561 7,525,407 4,970,981 6,377,697 2,884,700 2,525,303 8,633,135 7,245,788 6,475,521
18,786,515 20,582,352 21,534,587 21,262,889 23,019,311 20,888,168 20,251,794 24,703,851 23,170,954 22,035,525
Worker's Compensation and General Liability ‐ 10 Yr History of Cash Balance
Fiscal Year
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Worker's Compensation $12,622,990 $13,893,791 $14,009,180 $16,291,908 $16,641,614 $18,003,468 $17,726,491 $16,070,716 $15,925,166 $15,560,004
General Liability $6,163,525 $6,688,561 $7,525,407 $4,970,981 $6,377,697 $2,884,700 $2,525,303 $8,633,135 $7,245,788 $6,475,521
$0
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
$16,000,000
$18,000,000
$20,000,000
Worker's Compensation & General Liability
Cash Balances
5/14/2018
4
General Liability Funded Status
6/30/17
General Liability (Claims & Judgments) Funding Status 2016 2017
Net Working Capital 7,591,783 7,119,061
Actuarial Target Funding Level (75% Confidence Level) 8,931,470 12,932,306*
Percentage of Actuarial Target Funded 85% 55%
* Significant claims not considered by the actuary.
General Liability
$2,986,000+$3,253,000 = $6,239,000PROPOSED 2018-19 Budget
2017-18 2018-19 $ Change % Change
Revised Proposed Over PY Over PY
Revenue Revenue Revised Revised
General Liability Premium 4,068,231 6,239,000 2,170,769 34.79%
5/14/2018
5
General Liability Loss Trend
Worker Comp Funded Status
6/30/17
Workers' Compensation Funding Status 2016 2017
Net Working Capital 16,119,333 16,135,932
Actuarial Target Funding Level (75% Confidence Level) 16,673,000 19,629,000
Percentage of Actuarial Target Funded 97% 82%
5/14/2018
6
Worker’s Compensation – 2018‐19
PROPOSED 2018-19 Budget
2017-18 2018-19 $ Change % Change
Revised Proposed Over PY Over PY
Revenue Revenue Revised Revised
Workers Compensation Premium 2,753,928 3,753,921 * 999,993 26.64%
*Increased department charges by $999,993. Still $907,079 short of actuary’s recommended annual charge to departments of $4,661,000.
$4,106,000+555,000 = $4,661,000
Worker’s Compensation Loss Trend
5/10/2018
1
City of Newport Beach Whitebirch Long-Range
Financial Planning Demonstration
Finance Committee
Thursday, May 10, 2018
Agenda
•Introduce the new PFM Whitebirch model and its
methodology
•Explain our growth assumptions and how they are used
•Demonstrate fiscal impact of various assumptions
Item No. 5B1
Long Range Financial Forecast (LRFF)
Additional Materials Received May 10,
2018
5/10/2018
2
Baseline growth projections
are based on historical
CAGR. Alternatives model
the impact of constrained or
higher growth when
d h bli
Impacts allows us to model
the fiscal impact of any
projected deviation from
the baseline on $ or % basis
Impacts or any of the
alternative baseline
scenarios can be organized
into higher level initiatives
or what‐if scenarios
Baseline, alternate baselines, impacts,
initiatives and what‐if scenarios can be
packaged and organized into high‐level
scenarios
Model Organization
Baseline Scenarios
1.Baseline –relies on FY05 to FY17 adjusted CAGR growth factors
2.Alternative 1 – Constrained (conservative) revenue growth
3.Alternative 2 – Assumes recession with lower revenue
growth and some expenditure cuts at seven year intervals starting in FY21, FY 27 and FY 35.
4.Alternative 3 – Assumes higher levels of annual growth for the City’s top revenue sources when compared to the
baseline forecast.
General Fund Contingency Reserve 2016 2017
Contingency Reserve Cash Balance 45,763,058 47,523,255
Target Reserve Level (25% of General Fund Operating Budget)45,763,058 47,523,255
Percentage of Target Funded 100%100%
Facilities Financial Planning (FFP) Reserve 2016 2017
Unrestricted Fund Balance 13,680,787 23,900,797
Maximum Annual Debt Service 8,175,115 8,162,614
Percentage of Target Funded 167%293%
Bonded Debt Management (F-6)2016 2017
Debt Service as % of General Fund Revenues 4.1%4.0%
Target Debt Service % of General Fund Revenues < 8%< 8%
Water Stabilization and Contingency Reserve 2016 2017
Stabilization and Contingency Reserve 11,426,314 10,902,221
Target Funding Level (50% Operating Budget)11,426,314 10,902,221
Percentage of Target Funded 100%100%
Water Infrastructure Reserves 2016 2017
Water Infrastructure Reserve 4,021,749 7,890,808
Historical Cost of Infrastructure 128,693,595 132,961,901
Accumulated Depreciation 47,810,395 49,453,704
Percentage of Depreciation Funded 8.4%16.0%
Wastewater Stabilization and Contingency Reserve 2016 2017
Stabilization and Contingency Reserve 826,246 1,806,505
Target Funding Level (50% Operating Budget)1,694,307 1,806,505
Percentage of Target Funded 49%100%
Wastewater Infrastructure Reserves 2016 2017
Wastewater Infrastructure Reserve 1,748,731 444,351
Historical Cost of Infrastructure 45,815,073 47,211,325
Accumulated Depreciation 17,005,826 17,596,915
Percentage of Depreciation Funded 10%3%
Equipment Replacement Funding Status 2016 2017
Reserve 14,697,055 14,545,465
Accumulated Depreciation 18,989,542 19,862,974
Percentage of Depreciation Funded 77%73%
General Liability (Claims & Judgments) Funding Status 2016 2017
Cash Reserve 7,591,783 7,119,061
Actuarial Target Funding Level (75% Confidence Level)8,931,470 12,932,306
Percentage of Actuarial Target Funded 85%55%
Workers' Compensation Funding Status 2016 2017
Cash Reserve 16,119,333 16,135,932
Maximum (Actuarial Target Funding Level (75% Confidence Level))16,673,000 19,629,000
Percentage of Actuarial Target Funded 97%82%
Compensated Absences Funding Status 2016 2017
Cash Reserve 3,994,379 4,477,068
Long Term Liability 9,045,949 9,386,089
Minimum Target Funding Level (3 yr Avg of Cash Flows)2,030,924 2,165,131
Maximum Target Funding Level (50% of Liabilities)4,522,975 4,693,045
Percentage of Max Target Funded 88%95%
Pension 2015 2016
Trust Assets - Market Value 572,699,003 566,016,065
Long Term Liability 848,372,949 887,481,877
Unfunded Liability 275,673,946 321,465,812
Percentage of Liability Funded 68%64%
OPEB 2016 2017
Trust Assets - Market Value 16,131,814 19,078,995
Long Term Liability 42,737,245 44,614,266
Unfunded Liability 26,605,431 25,535,271
Percentage of Liability Funded 38%43%
Funding Status of Key Reserves
Item No. 5F1
Risk Based
Reserve Status
Update
Additional
Materials Received
May 10, 2018
I:\Users\FIN\Shared\Admin\Finance Committee\WORKPLAN\2018\2018 FC Workplan 1
Updated 05/10/2018
Scheduled Date Agenda Title Agenda Description
Tuesday, January 09, 2018 Council Study Session 9th - Economic Overview (Optional)Broad Local Economic Overview to be provided by Beacon Economics.
Thursday, January 11, 2018 Risk Based Reserve Analysis Overview Consultant will provide an update and overview of the Risk -based Reserve Analysis. Consultant Overview of Property and Sales Tax Revenues Consulting specialists in Property and Sales Tax will provide an overview of revenue prospects.
Long Range Financial Forecast (LRFF)City staff will provide an update on efforts to improve the City's Long Range Financial Forecast and provide a comparative review of best practices to other cities.
Review of Finance Committee Resolution The Committee will review its objectives as set forth in Council resolution 94-110 as amended by 2017-58.
Review of Finance Committee Workplan Staff will review with the Committee the agenda topics scheduled for the remainder of the fiscal year and highlight those work plan items that were carried forward from the prior fiscal year. The Committee will also consider
setting up a subcommittee to review finance related Council Policies.
Monday, January, 29, 2018 Council Goal Setting Session - (FYI Only)
Thursday, February 15, 2018
Create a Subcommittee to Review Council Finance Policies
The FinanceCommitteewill consider the creation of a Finance Subcommittee
to review Council Finance policies,discuss membership, scope of work andtimeline. Risk-Based Reserve Subcommittee Update Discuss Finance Committee progress since the last meeting.
Debt Policy Review Subcommittee Update Subcommittee will discuss revisions of Debt Policy and discuss next steps.
Review of Police Department Budget to Actual Results In preparation of the 2018-2019 Budget,staff will review budget assumptionsagainst actual results for Fiscal Year 2016-2017 and pertinent updatesconcerning the Fiscal Year 2017-2018 to date.
Year-End Closing Results Staff will present year-end closing results for Fiscal Year 2016-2017.
Pension Discussion
Agenda item reserved fordiscussionregarding thestatus of theCity's pensionliability, payment strategies, CalPERS policy updates and or advocacy efforts.
Review of Finance Committee WorkPlan
Staff will review with the Committee the agenda topics scheduled for theremainder of the fiscal year and highlight those work plan items carriedforward from the priorfiscal year. The Committee will also consider setting upa subcommittee to review finance related Council Policies.
MARCH
Thursday, March 15, 2018 Audit Closing The City’s external audit firm, White Nelson Diehl Evans LLP will meet with the Finance Committee to discuss the audit findings for the fiscal year ending
6/30/2017. The committee will have an opportunity to discuss any potential areas of concern and the auditors can discuss any changes in accounting standards or disclosures that were relevant for the audit year.
Harbor & Beaches Master Plan Review Harbor & Beaches Master Plan for financial solvency based on known Council Priorities
Review of Fire Department Budget to Actual Results In preparation of the 2018-19 Budget, staff will review budget assumptions against actual results for fiscal year 2016-17.
Facilities Financial Plan Review Facilities Financial Plan for financial solvency based on known Council
Priorities
Pension Discussion
Agenda item reserved fordiscussionregarding thestatus of theCity's pensionliability, payment strategies, CalPERS policy updates and or advocacy efforts.
APRILThursday, April 5, 2018 Submit Budget Documents to Finance Committee - Information Only ** NOT A MEETING DATE **Information Only - Not a meeting date.
Thursday, April 12, 2018 Fiscal Year 2018-19 Budget Brief Overview Staff will prepare brief presentation of key initiatives proposed in the City Manager’s Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Proposed Budget.
Internal Controls Staff will prepare a brief presentation summarizing of internal and external
review of internal control efforts.
Revere Policy Subcommittee Update Staff and or Subcommittee members will provide the Finance Committee a brief update on the status of the Risk-Based Reserve Study.Budget Amendments Receive and file a staff report on the budget amendments for the prior quarter.
Workplan Review Staff will review with the Committee the agenda topics scheduled for the remainder of the calendar year. MAYThursday, May 10, 2018 Finance Committee Budget Review Staff will provide a high-level variance analysis and will address certain questions raised by the Committee during the April meeting.
Long-Range Financial Forecast Staff will provide a preview and update on the latest draft of our new Long Range Financial Forecast.Agreed Upon Audit Procedures for Internal Control The Finance Department is working with the City’s audit firm, White Nelson Diehl Evans LLP, to develop agreed upon procedures for the audit of the City’s internal control processes and procedures. Staff will present these agreed upon procedures for the Finance Committee’s review. Assessment District (AD) 117 Update Staff will provide an oral update on the progress of AD 117.
Uptown Newport Community Facilities District (CFD) Update Staff will provide an oral update on the progress of the Uptown Newport CFD.
Risk Based Reserve Status Update Staff will provide an oral update on the Risk Based Reserve Study being performed by the GFOA.
Work Plan Review Staff will review with the Committee the agenda topics scheduled for the remainder of the calendar year.Tuesday May 22, 2018 Council Budget Study Session (Joint FC Study Session )District discretionary grants, position count changes, pensions operating budget expenditures and other topics will be covered with both the City Council and Finance Committee.
Thursday, May 24, 2018 FY 2018-19 Budget Review & Recommendation(s) to Council
Reserved For Policy Discussion(s)
JUNE
Tuesday, June 12, 2018 Council Budget Adoption For Information Purposes Only - Not a Finance Committee Meeting Date
Reserve Policy Presentation of Draft Report: GFOA Risk Based Analysis of General Fund Reserve Requirements
Thursday June 14, 2018 Reserved For Policy Discussion(s)Master Fee Schedule Staff will present the Master Fee Schedule to the Finance Committee and subsequently will present to the City Council at the July 24, 2018, meeting.
Workplan Review Staff will review with the Committee the agenda topics scheduled for the
remainder of the calendar year.
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
City of Newport Beach Finance Committee Work Plan 2017-18
Item No. 5G1
Work Plan
Review
Additional
Materials
Received
May 10, 2018