HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-72 - Amending City Council Reserve Policy F-2RESOLUTION NO. 2018-72
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CITY
COUNCIL RESERVE POLICY F-2
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach ("City") has a long and
established history of being good guardians and stewards of the public's money;
WHEREAS, appropriations, expenditures and other budgetary matters are a
primary concern of the City Council;
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted various policies regarding financial
matters;
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted City Council Reserve Policy F-2 for the
administration of "Reserves," which are defined within the policy as fund balances in
governmental funds and net working capital in proprietary funds;
WHEREAS, on December 12, 1994, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 94-
110 establishing the Finance Committee, whose duties and responsibilities have been
amended throughout the years to further protect and safe guard the public's money;
WHEREAS, the existing Finance Committee is charged with a variety of tasks,
including, but not limited to: reviewing and monitoring events and issues which may affect
the financial status of the City; and making recommendations to the City Council
regarding amendments to financial and budgetary policies; and
WHEREAS, the Finance Committee has recommended an amendment to City
Council Reserve Policy F-2 that excludes the additional discretionary payments to the
City's unfunded pension liability from the annual Contingency Reserve calculation.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach resolves as
follows:
Section 1: The City Council hereby amends City Council Reserve Policy F-2 as
described in Attachment 'A," which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference.
Section 2: The City Council hereby repeals all prior versions of City Council
Reserve Policy F-2 that are in conflict with this resolution.
Section 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this
resolution is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not
affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this resolution. The City
Council hereby declares that it would have passed this resolution and each section,
subsection, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or
more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid or
unconstitutional.
Resolution 2018-72
Page 2 of 2
Section 4: The recitals provided in this resolution are true and correct and are
incorporated into the substantive portion of this resolution.
Section 5: The City Council find the adoption of this resolution and the
amendment of City Council Reserve Policy F-2 is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not
result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment)
and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA
Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no
potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly.
Section 6: This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the
City Council, and the City Clerk shall certify the vote adopting this resolution.
ADOPTED this 25th day of September, 2018.
ATTEST:
A ic)/
Leilani I. Brown
City Clerk
Marshall "Duffy" Duffield
Mayor
APPRQXLEJD AS TO FORM:
I r (w
-Av�,
Aaron C. Harp
City Attorney
Attachment A: Amended City Council Reserve Policy F-2
RESERVE POLICY
Purpose
F-2
To establish City Council policy for the administration of Reserves defined as
fund balances in governmental funds and net working capital in proprietary
funds.
Background
Prudent financial management dictates that some portion of the funds available
to the City be reserved for future use.
As a general budget principle concerning the use of reserves, the City Council
decides whether to appropriate funds from Reserve accounts. Even though a
project or other expenditure qualifies as a proper use of Reserves, the Council
may decide that it is more beneficial to use current year operating revenues or
bond proceeds instead, thereby retaining the Reserve funds for future use.
Reserve funds will not be spent for any function other than the specific purpose
of the Reserve account from which they are drawn without specific direction in
the annual budget; or by a separate City Council action. Information regarding
Annual Budget Adoption and Administration is contained in City Council Policy
F-3.
Governmental Funds and Fund Balance Defined
Governmental Funds including the General Fund, Special Revenue Funds,
Capital Projects Funds, Debt Service Funds and Permanent Funds have a short-
term or current flow of financial resources, measurement focus and basis of
accounting and therefore, exclude long-term assets and long-term liabilities. The
term Fund Balance, used to describe the resources that accumulate in these funds,
is the difference between the fund assets and fund liabilities of these funds. Fund
Balance is similar to the measure of net working capital that is used in private
sector accounting. By definition, both Fund Balance and Net Working Capital
exclude long-term assets and long-term liabilities.
Proprietary Funds and Net Working Capital Defined
Proprietary Funds including Enterprise Funds and Internal Service Funds have
a long- term or economic resources measurement focus and basis of accounting
1
F-2
and therefore, include long-term assets and liabilities. This basis of accounting is
very similar to that used in private sector. However, instead of Retained
Earnings, the term Net Assets is used to describe the difference between fund
assets and fund liabilities. Since Net Assets include both long-term assets and
liabilities, the most comparable measure of proprietary fund financial resources
to governmental Fund Balance is Net Working Capital, which is the difference
between current assets and current liabilities. Net Working Capital, like Fund
Balance, excludes long-term assets and long-term liabilities.
Governmental Fund Reserves (Fund Balance)
For Governmental Funds, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board
("GASB") Statement No. 54 defines five specific classifications of fund balance.
The five classifications are intended to identify whether the specific components
of fund balance are available for appropriation and are therefore "Spendable."
The classifications also are intended to identify the extent to which fund balance
is constrained by special restrictions, if any. Applicable only to governmental
funds, the five classifications of fund balance are as follows:
CLASSIFICATIONS NATURE OF RESTRICTION
Non -spendable
Restricted
Committed
Assigned
Unassigned
Cannot be readily converted to cash
Externally imposed restrictions
City Council imposed commitment
City Manager assigned
purpose/ intent
Residual balance not otherwise
restricted
A. Non -spendable fund balance: That portion of fund balance that includes
amounts that are either (a) not in a spendable form, or (b) legally or
contractually required to be maintained intact. Examples of Non -spendable
fund balance include:
1. Reserve for Inventories: The value of inventories purchased by the
City but not yet issued to the operating Departments is reflected in
this account.
2
F-2
2. Reserve for Long Term Receivables and Advances: This Reserve is
used ioidentify and segregate that portion of the City's financial assets
which are not due to be received for an extended period, so are not
available for appropriation during the budget year.
3. Reserve for Prepaid Assets: This reserve represents resources that
have been paid to another entity in advance of the accounting period
in which the resource is deducted from fund balance. A common
example is an insurance premium, which is typically payable in
advance of the coverage period.
Although prepaid assets have yet to be deducted from fund
balance, they are no longer available for appropriation.
4. Reserve for Permanent Endowment - Bay Dredging: The endowment
specifiesthat the principal amount will not be depleted and represents
the asset amounts to be held in the Bay Dredging Fund.
5. Reserve for Permanent Endowment - Ackerman Fund: The evbmiut
specifies that the principal amount will not be depleted and
represents the asset amount to be held in the Ackerman Fund.
B. Restricted fund balance: The portion of fund balance that reflects constraints
placed on the use of resources (other than non -spendable items) that are
either (a) externally imposed by creditors, grantors, contributors, or laws
or regulations of other governments; or (b) imposed by law through
constitutional provisions or enabling legislation. Examples of restricted
fund balance are:
1. Reserve for Debt Service: Funds are placed in this Reserve at the time
debt is issued. The provisions governing the Reserve, if established,
are in the Bond Indenture and the Reserve itself is typically controlled
by the Trustee.
2. Affordable Housing: A principal provision of the Newport Beach
Housing Element requires developers to provide housing units for
lower income households, the number of which is to be negotiated
for each development project. In lieu of constructing affordable
housing, developers have paid into this reserve which is used at the
City Council's discretion to provide alternate methods for the
delivery of affordable housing for lower income households.
3
F-2
3. Park In Lieu: Per NBMC 19.52 and California Government Code
Section 664777 (The 1975 "Quimby Act"), a dedication of land or
payment of fees for park or recreational purposes in conjunction with
residential development is required. The fees collected can only be
used for specific park or recreation purposes as outlined in NBMC
19.52.030 and 19.52.070.
4. Upper Newport Bay Restoration Reserve: This reserve is the
repository for funds mandated by SB573, as well as special fees
charged to permit holders as an alternative to meeting certain
specified mitigation criteria. In addition to the mitigation fees, ten
percent (10%) of Beacon Bay lease revenue is placedin this Reserve.
Funds in the Reserve are restricted for Upper Newport Bay
restoration projects.
5. Permanent Endowment for Bay Dredging: The endowment also
specifies that the interest earnings on the principal amount can only
be used for dredging projects in the Newport Bay.
6. Permanent Endowment for Ackerman Fund: The endowment also
specifies that the interest earnings on the principal amount can only be
used for scholarships provided by the City and high-tech library
equipment.
7. Oceanfront Encroachment Reserve: In the early 1990's, it was
discovered by survey that improvements to several ocean front
parcels were encroaching onto the public beach. The encroachment
was relatively minor. The negotiated solution was for the property
owners to pay a permit fee each year to the City. Revenue thus
generated may only be used for ocean front restoration projects and
incidental costs of improvements and maintenance to enhance public
access and use of ocean beaches as approved by the City Council. This
Reserve is the repository for those funds. City Council Policy L- 12
contains additional background and details about the encroachment
issue The external restriction on this balance is imposed by the Local
Coastal Plan (LCP).
C. Committed fund balance: That portion of a fund balance that includes
amounts that can only be used for specific purposes pursuant to constraints
imposed by formal action by the government's highest level of decision
4
F-2
making authority, and remain binding unless removed in the same manner.
The City considers a resolution to constitute a formal action for the purposes
of establishing committed fund balance. The action to constrain resources
must occur within the fiscal reporting period; however the amount can be
determined subsequently. City Council imposed Commitments are as
follows:
1. Facilities Financial Planning((FFP) Fund: In conjunction with the C.,ity's
Facilities Financial Plan, a sinking fund has been established to
amortize the cost of critical City facilities such as, but not limited to,
the Civic Center, Police Department buildings, Fire Stations, Library
Branches and other Facility Improvement Projects.
The Facilities Financial Planning Program establishes a level charge
to the General Fund that will perpetually replenish the cash flows
necessary to finance the construction of critical City facilities. This
plan will be updated annually as part of the budget process, or as
conditions change. The City shall strive to maintain fund balance in
the Facilities Financial Planning Reserve at a level equal to or greater
than the maximum annual debt service on existing obligations.
The eligible uses of this reserve include the cash funding of public
facility improvements or the servicing of related debt.
2. Off Street Parking: Per NBMC 12.44.025 the City Council may direct
revenues into the off-street parking facilities fund for purposes of the
acquisition, development and improvement of off street parking
facilities, and for any expenditures necessary or convenient to
accomplish such purposes.
3. In Lieu Parking: Per NBMC 12.44.125 the City requires commercial
businesses to provide adequate off-street parking or where this is not
possible, businesses are afforded the opportunity to pay an annual
fee and use parking spaces in a municipal lot, providing such a lot is
located within specified proximity to the business. These funds can
only be used to provide additional parking.
4. Neighborhood Enhancement - A: Funds previously accumulated to
Neighborhood Enhancement Area "A" pursuant to a prior version
of NBMC 12.44.027 shall continue to be used only for the purpose of
5
F-2
enhancing and supplementing services to the West Newport area.
Both the nature of the supplemental services and the definition of the
area served are set forth in NBMC 12.44.027.
5. Neighborhood Enhancement - B: Funds previously accumulated to
Neighborhood Enhancement Area "B" pursuant to a prior version of
NBMC 12.44.027 shall continue to be used only for the purpose of
enhancing and supplementing services in the Balboa Peninsula. Both
the nature of the supplemental services and the definition of the area
served are set forth in NBMC 12.44.027.
6. Cable Franchise: Pursuant to the provisions of the Newport Beach
Municipal Code, Title 5, Business Licenses & Regulations, Chapter
5.44, in return for the use of the City's streets and public ways for the
purpose of installing, operating, maintaining, or reconstructing a
cable system to provide cable service, fees are collected by the City
from cable providers. Those fees are to be used by the City for support
of Public, Education, and Government access programming only.
7. Oil and Gas Reserve: The annual $40,000 which is being set aside from
the oil and gas field production revenues is to be used to fund
abandoned wells and facilities as they go out of service.
8. Capital Reappropriation: This reserve represents an administrative
procedure that recognizes a portion of fund balance is not readily
available to fund new endeavors because it has been reappropriated
through the budget adoption process or amendment process.
D. Assigned fund balance: That portion of a fund balance that includes
amounts that are constrained by the City's intent to be used for specific
purposes but that are not restricted or committed. This policy hereby
delegates the authority to the City Manager or designee to modify or
create new assignments of fund balance. Constraints imposed on the use
of assigned amounts may be changed by the City Manager or his
designee. Appropriations of balances are subject to Council Policy F-3
concerning budget adoption and administration.
E. Unassigned fund balance:
Contingency Reserve: The Contingency Reserve shall have a target
balance of twenty five percent (25%) of General Fund "Operating
on
F-2
Budget" as originally adopted. Operating Budget for this purpose
shall include current expenditure appropriations and shall exclude
Capital Improvement Projects, Transfers Out, and additional
discretionary payments to the City's unfunded pension liability.
Appropriation and/ or access to these funds are generally reserved
for emergency or unforeseen situations but may be accessed by
Council by simple budget appropriation. Examples may include but
are not limited to the following:
a. A catastrophic loss of critical infrastructure.
b. A State or Federally declared state of emergency.
C. Any settlement arising from a claim or judgment.
d. Deviation from budgeted revenue projections.
e. Any action by another government that eliminates or shifts
revenues from the City.
f. Inability of the City to meet its debt service obligations in any
given year.
g. Other circumstances deemed necessary by City Council to meet
the claims and obligations of the City.
Should the Contingency Reserve be used, the City Manager shall
present a plan to City Council to replenish the reserve within five
years.
2. Residual Fund Balance: The residual portion of available fund
balance that is not otherwise restricted, committed or assigned and is
above and beyond the Contingency Reserve target reserve balance.
Proprietary Fund Reserves (Net Working Capital)
In the case of Proprietary Funds (Enterprise and Internal Service Funds),
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP") does not permit the
reporting of reserves on the face of City financial statements. However, this does
not preclude the City from setting policies to accumulate financial resources for
prudent financial management of its proprietary fund operations. Since
7
F-2
proprietary funds may include both long-term capital assets and long-term
liabilities, the most comparable measure of liquid financial resources that is
similar to fund balance in proprietary funds is net working capital which is the
difference between current assets and current liabilities. For all further references
to reserves in Proprietary Funds, Net Working Capital is the intended meaning.
A. Water Enterprise Fund
1. Stabilization and Contingency Reserve: This Reserve is used to
RuOde sufficient funds to support seasonal variations in cash flows
and in more extreme conditions, to maintain operations for a
reasonable period of time so the City may reorganize in an orderly
manner or effectuate a rate increase to offset sustained cost increases.
The intent of the Reserve is to provide funds to offset cost increases
that are projected to be short-lived, thereby partially eliminating the
volatility in annual rate adjustments. It is not intended to offset
ongoing, long-term pricing structure changes. The target level of this
reserve is fifty percent (50%) of the annual operating budget. This
reserve level is intended to provide a reorganization period of 6
months with zero income or 24 months at a twenty-five percent (25%)
loss rate. The City Council must approve the use of these funds, based
on City Manager recommendation. Funds collected in excess of the
Stabilization reserve target would be available to offset future rate
adjustments, while extended reserve shortfalls would be recovered
from future rate increases. Should catastrophic losses to the
infrastructure system occur, the Stabilization and Contingency
Reserve may be called upon to avoid disruption to water
distribution.
2. Infrastructure Replacement Funding Policy: This funding policy
is intended to be a temporary repository for cash flows
associated with the funding of infrastructure replacement projects
provided by the Water Master Plan. The contribution rate is
intended to level -amortize the cost of infrastructure replacement
projects over a long period. The annual funding rate of the Water
Master Plan is targeted at an amount that, when combined with prior
or future year contributions, is sufficient to provide for the eventual
replacement of assets as scheduled in the plan. This contribution
policy is based on the funding requirements of the most current
Water Master Plan. There are no minimum or maximum balances
contemplated by this funding policy. However, the contributions
8
F-2
level should be reviewed periodically or as major updates to the
Water Master Plan occur. Annual funding is contingent on many
factors and may ultimately involve a combined strategy of cash
funding and debt issuance with the intent to normalize the burden on
Water customer rates.
B. Wastewater Enterprise Fund
1. Stabilization and Contingency Reserve: This Reserve is used to
provide sufficient funds to support seasonal variations in cash flows
and in more extreme conditions, to maintain operations for a
reasonable period of time so the City may reorganize in an orderly
manner or effectuate a rate increase to offset sustained cost increases.
The intent of the Reserve is to provide funds to offset cost increases
that are projected to be short-lived, thereby partially eliminating the
volatility in annual rate adjustments. It is not intended to offset
ongoing, long-term pricing structure changes. The target level of this
reserve is fifty percent (50%) of the annual operating budget. This
reserve level is intended to provide a reorganization period of 6
months with zero income or 24 months at a twenty-five percent (25%)
loss rate. The City Council must approve use of these funds, based on
City Manager recommendation. Funds collected in excess of the
Stabilization reserve target would be available to offset future rate
adjustments, while extended reserve shortfalls would be recovered
from future rate increases. Should catastrophic losses to the
infrastructure system occur, the Stabilization and Contingency
Reserve may be called upon to avoid disruption to wastewater
service.
2. Infrastructure Replacement Funding Policy: This funding policy
is intended to be a temporary repository for cash flows
associated with the funding of infrastructure replacement projects
provided by the Wastewater Master Plan. The contribution rate is
intended to level -amortize the cost of infrastructure replacement
projects over a long period of time. The annual funding rate of the
Wastewater Master Plan is targeted at an amount that, when
combined with prior or future year contributions, is sufficient to
provide for the eventual replacement of assets as scheduled in the
plan. This contribution policy should be updated periodically based
on the most current Wastewater Master Plan. There are no minimum
E
F-2
or maximum balances contemplated by this funding policy.
However, the contributions level should be reviewed periodically or
as major updates to the Wastewater Master Plan occur. Annual
funding is contingent on many factors and may ultimately involve a
combined strategy of cash funding and debt issuance with the intent
to normalize the burden on Wastewater customer rates.
C. Internal Service Funds Background.
Internal Service Funds are used to centrally manage and account for specific
program activity in a centralized cost center. Their revenue generally comes
from internal charges to departmental operating budgets rather than
external revenue sources. They have several functions.
--They work well in normalizing departmental budgeting for programs that
have life -cycles greater than one year; thereby facilitating level budgeting
for expenditures that will, by their nature, be erratic from year to year. This
also facilitates easier identification of long term trends.
--They act as a strategic savings plan for long-term assets and liabilities.
--From an analytical standpoint, they enable appropriate distribution of
city-wide costs to individual departments, thereby more readily
establishing true costs of various operations.
Since departmental charges to the internal service fund duplicate the
ultimate expenditure from the internal service fund, they are eliminated
when consolidating entity -wide totals.
The measurement criteria, cash flow patterns, funding horizon and
acceptable funding levels are unique to each program being funded.
Policy regarding target balance and/ or contribution policy, gain/ loss
amortization assumption, source data, and governance for each of the
City's Internal Service Funds is set forth as follows:
For all Internal Service Funds: The Finance Director may transfer part
or all of any unencumbered fund balance between the Internal Service
Funds provided that the withdrawal of funds from the transferred
fund would not cause insufficient reserve levels or insufficient
resources to carry out its intended purpose. This action is appropriate
when the decline in cash balance in any fund is precipitated by an off -
10
F-2
trend non-recurring event. The Finance Director will make such
recommendations as part of the annual budget adoption or through
separate Council action.
2. Equipment Maintenance Fund and Equipment Replacement Fund:
The Equipment Maintenance and Replacement Funds receive
operating money from the Departments to provide equipment
maintenance and to fund the regular replacement of major pieces of
equipment (mostly vehicles) at their economic obsolescence.
a. Equipment Maintenance Fund: The Equipment Maintenance
Fund acts solely as a cost allocation center (vs. a pre -funding
center) and is funded on a pay- as -you -go basis by
departmental maintenance charges by vehicle type and usage
requirement. Because of this limited function, the target year-
end balance is zero.
Contribution rates (departmental charges) are set to include the
direct costs associated with maintaining the City vehicle fleet,
including fleet maintenance employee salary and benefits,
operating expenses and maintenance related capital outlay.
Administrative overhead and maintenance facility
improvements and replacement costs are to be provided
outside of this cost unit. Governance is achieved through
annual management adjustment of contribution rates on the
basis of maintenance cost by vehicle and distribution of costs
based on fleet use by department.
b. Equipment Replacement Fund: Operating Departments are
charged annual amounts sufficient to accumulate funds for the
replacement of vehicles, communications equipment, parking
equipment and other equipment replacement determined
appropriate by the Finance Director. The City Manager
recommends annual rate adjustments as part of the
budget preparation process. These adjustments are based
on pricing, future replacement schedules and other variables.
The age and needs of the equipment inventory vary from year
to year. Therefore the year-end fund balance will fluctuate in
direct correlation to accumulated depreciation. In general, it
will increase in the years preceding the scheduled replacement
of relatively large percentage of the equipment, on a dollar
11
F-2
value basis. However, rising equipment costs, dissimilar
future needs, replacing equipment faster than their expected
life or maintaining equipment longer than their expected life all
contribute to variation from the projected schedule.
Target funding levels shall be determined by the Finance
Director after considering the age, expected life and cash flow
anticipated by the replacement equipment being funded. If
departmental replacement charges for equipment prove to be
excessive or insufficient with regard to this target funding
level, new rates established during the next budget cycle will
be adjusted with a view toward bringing the balance back to
the target level over a three-year period.
3. Insurance Reserve Funds: The Insurance Reserve funds account for
the activities of general liability and workers' compensation claims.
Background.
The City employs an actuary to estimate the liabilities associated
with the general liability and workers compensation activities. The
costs typically associated with these programs include: claims
administration, legal defense, insurance premiums, self insured
retention and the establishment of appropriate loss reserves
including "incurred -but -not reported" (IBNR) claims. In a
prescribed measurement methodology, the Actuary estimates the
liabilities in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (GAAP).
The Actuary refers to this measurement level in his report as the
"Expected Level." However, because actuarial estimates are subject to
significant uncertainties, actuaries typically recommend that a target
funding level be set at an amount in excess of expected liability as a
margin to cover contingencies. A typical target funding level would
be set to obtain a specified confidence level (the percent chance that
resources set-aside will be sufficient to cover existing claims).
Full funding of the Actuary's "Target Funding Level" establishes a
seventy-five percent (75%) confidence there will be sufficient
resources (including projected interest) to pay the full amount of
existing claims without future contributions. Funding at the
12
F-2
"Expected Level" produces a confidence level of only fifty percent to
sixty-five percent (50%-65% ). Therefore, the target funding of
insurance reserves should exceed the "Expected Level" to account for
adverse estimate deviation.
Policy & Practice.
The City should target funding of its risk management obligations at
not less than the Expected Level, described above; and not more than
an amount sufficient to establish a seventy-five percent (75%)
Confidence Level. Actuarial losses should be recovered over a rolling
3 -year basis while actuarial gains should be amortized over a rolling
5 -year basis. As part of the operating budget, each department will
be charged a rate equal to its proportionate share of the total
"revenue" required to fund the Insurance Reserve Fund at this level.
To lessen the impact of short-term annual rate change fluctuation,
City management may implement one-time fund transfers (rather
than department rate increases) when funding shortfalls appear to
be due to unusually sharp and non-recurring factors. Excess reserves
in other areas may be transferred to the internal service fund in these
instances but such transfers should not exceed the funding necessary
to reach a seventy-five (75 %) confidence level interval.
4. Compensated
Absences Fund:
Background.
The primary purpose of flex leave, vacation leave and sick leave is to
provide compensated time off as appropriate and approved.
However, under certain circumstances, typically at separation from
service, some employees have the option of receiving cash -out
payments for some accumulated leave balances. The Compensated
Absences Fund is utilized primarily as a budget smoothing technique
for any such leave bank liquidations. The primary purpose of the
Compensated Absences Fund is to maintain a balance sufficient to
facilitate this smoothing.
Policy and Practice.
13
F-2
The contribution rate will be set to cover estimated annual cash flows
based on a three-year trailing average.
The minimum cash reserve should not fall below that three-year
average. The maximum cash reserve should not exceed fifty percent
(50%) of the long term liability. The target cash reserve shall be the
median difference between the minimum and maximum figures.
Each department will make contributions to the Compensated
Absences Fund through its operating budget as a specified
percentage of salary. The Finance Director will review and
recommend adjustments to the percentage of salary required during
the annual budget development process. This percentage will be
set so as to maintain the reserve within the parameters established
above.
5. Post Retirement Funding Policies:
a. Pension Funding:
W California Public Employees Retirement Se sy tem
CalPERS : The City's principal Defined Benefit Pension
program is provided through contract with Ca1PERS.
The City's contributions to the plan include an actuarially
determined employer contribution that fluctuates each
year based on an annual actuarial plan valuation. This
variable rate employer contribution includes the normal
cost of providing the contracted benefits plus or minus
an amortization of plan changes and net actuarial gains
and losses since the last valuation period.
It is the City's policy to make contributions to the plan
equaling at least one hundred percent (100%) of the
actuarially required contribution (annual pension cost).
Because the City pays the entire actuarially required
contribution each year, by definition, its net pension
obligation at the end of each year is $0. Any unfunded
actuarial liability (UAL) is amortized and paid in
accordance with the actuary's funding
recommendations. The City will strive to maintain its
14
F-2
UAL within a range that is considered acceptable to
actuarial standards. The City Council shall consider
increasing the annual CalPERS contribution should the
UAL status fall below acceptable actuarial standards.
(ii) Laborer's International Union of North America
(LIUNA): The Cky provides funds to support a
supplemental pension plan for some employee
associations through contract with LIUNA. This is
funded at a fixed percentage of total compensation on a
pay-as-you-go basis. The City is not contractually
required to guarantee the level of the ultimate LIUNA
benefit to retirees, nor does it do so. Therefore the City's
liability for this program is full funded each year.
b. Other Post Employment Benefits
(OPEB Funding): Back ound.
The City's OPEB funding obligations consists of two retiree
medical plans.
New Plan. Effective January 2006, the City and its employee
associations agreed to major changes to the Post Employment
Healthcare Plan. New employees and all current employees
participate in a program that requires certain defined employee
and employer contributions while the employee is in active
service. However, once the contributions have been made to the
employee's account, the City has transferred a substantial
portion of the funding risk to the employee.
Old Plan. Eligible employees who retired prior to the "New
Plan" and certain active employees were eligible to continue to
receive post-retirement medical benefits (a defined benefit
plan). The cost was divided among the City, current employees
and retirees. In the past, this program was largely funded on a
pay-as-you-go basis, so there was a significant unfunded
liability. Recognizing this problem, the City began contributing
to this obligation in 2001. In 2008, these assets were placed in a
pre -funding trust. The City's intention is to amortize the
remaining unfunded liability within 20 years.
15
F-2
Policy & Practice.
New Plan. Consistent with agreements between the City and
Employee Associations, the new defined contribution plan will
be one hundred percent (100%) funded, on an ongoing basis, as
part of the annual budget process. Funds to cover this
expenditure will be contained within the salary section of each
department's annual operating budget.
Old Plan. The City's policy is to pre fund the explicit (cash
subsidy) portion of the Actuarial Accrued Liability (AAL) of
the remnants of the old plan over a 20 -year amortization
period, or less. This amount will be based on the Annual
Required Contribution (ARC) determined by a biennial
actuarial review; subject to review and analysis by the City. The
City will strive to maintain a funded status that will be within
a range that is considered acceptable to actuarial standards. The
City Council shall consider increasing the annual OPEB
contribution should the funded status fall below acceptable
actuarial standards.
History
Adopted F-3 -
10-01-1963 (Sewer System Funding)
Adopted F-8 -
10-01-1963 (Capital Improvement Fund and Property Sale Revenues)
Amended F-8
- 08-15-1966
Amended F-8
- 05-21-1968
Amended F-8
- 11-12-1968
Amended F-8
03-09-1970
Amended F-3
- 05-25-1970
Reaffirmed F-8 - 02-14-1972
Amended F-8
-12-10-1973
Amended F-8
-11-11-1974
Amended F-3
- 07-11-1978
Adopted F-5 06-25-1979
(Stabilization Fund)
Amended F-810-22-1984
Amended F-3
-10-22-1990
Adopted F-2 -
01-24-1994 (Reserve Policy) - combining F-3, F-5, and F-8 (part of F-4)
Amended F-2
- 04-10-1995
Amended F-2
- 02-26-1996
Amended F-2
- 04-27-1998
Amended F-2
- 03-14-2000
16
Amended F-2 -
05-08-2001
Amended F-2
- 04-23-2002
Amended F-2 - 06-10-2003
Amended F-2
- 04-13-2004
Amended F-2 -
09-13-2005
Amended F-2 -
09-15-2008
Amended F-2-11-12-2008
Amended F-2 -
05-24-2011
Amended F-2 -
09-27-2011
Amended F-2 -
05-14- 2013
Amended F-2
- 06-10-2014
Amended F-2 -
05-12-2015
Amended F-2 -
09-25-2018
F-2
17
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF ORANGE } ss.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH }
I, Leilani I. Brown, City Clerk of the City of Newport Beach, California, do hereby certify that the
whole number of members of the City Council is seven; the foregoing resolution, being Resolution
No. 2018-72 was duly introduced before and adopted by the City Council of said City at a regular meeting
of said Council held on the 251h day of September, 2018; and the same was so passed and adopted by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Member Diane Dixon, Council Member Jeff Herdman, Council Member Kevin
Muldoon, Mayor Pro Tem Will O'Neill
NAYS: Council Member Scott Peotter
ABSENT: Council Member Brad Avery, Mayor Duffy Duffield
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the official seal of
said City this 261h day of September, 2018.
c
Leilani I. Brown
City Clerk
Newport Beach, California