Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.0_LaFrance and Baram Residence Encroachment PermitCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT October 18, 2018 SUBJECT: Agenda Item No. 4 LaFrance and Baram Residence Encroachment Permit Encroachment Permit No. N2018-0471 SITE LOCATION: 2209 Private Road APPLICANT: Craig LaFrance and Tallie Baram OWNER: Craig LaFrance and Tallie Baram PLANNER: Abby Cooke, Assistant Engineer 949-644-3323, acooke@newportbeachca.gov PROJECT SUMMARY A request to retain an existing non-compliant private improvement within the Private Road public right-of-way consisting a six-foot high concrete retaining wall previously approved by City Council on August 8, 2017. RECOMMENDATION 1) Find the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) (Preliminary Review) of the CEQA Guidelines, because it has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. PC2018-030 approving Encroachment Permit No. N2018-0471 (Attachment No. PC 1). 1 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE2 LaFrance and Baram Residence Encroachment Permit Planning Commission, October 18, 2018 Page 2 VICINITY MAP SUBJECT PROPERTY 3 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE4 LaFrance and Baram Residence Encroachment Permit Planning Commission, October 18, 2018 Page 3 INTRODUCTION The owners of 2209 Private Road are requesting a waiver of City Council Policy L-6 to maintain an existing six-foot high concrete wall within the Private Road public right-of- way. This request to retain the same existing retaining wall was previously approved by City Council on August 8, 2017 (Attachment No. PC 2 and PC 3). Per City Council recommendation, staff was directed to enter into an Encroachment Agreement with the Owners and authorize the City Manager and City Clerk to execute the Encroachment Agreement within one (1) calendar year upon receipt of approval. However, the property owners failed to enter into an Encroachment Agreement within the directed time. DISCUSSION City Council Policy L-6, “Encroachments in Public Rights-of-Way” (Policy), explains and describes how the public rights-of-way are to be reserved for public use or open space; and that the rights of the public, present and future, are not to be diminished by the installation of private improvements within the public rights-of-way. The Policy specifies allowable and prohibited encroachments and describes the required permits or encroachment agreements (Attachment No. PC 4). In Section A, which outlines the general encroachment prohibitions, “…structural encroachments including, but not limited to, fences, walls, patios, raised planters, etc., which encroach in excess of 1-foot into the public right-of-way or exceeds 3 feet in height…” are prohibited. The Owners are requesting a waiver of this policy to allow the retention of the retaining wall that encroaches up to 5.5-inches into the Private Road public right-of-way and measures up to a maximum of 6-feet in height from adjacent sidewalk grade (Attachment No. PC 5 and PC 6). The wall is the existing wall below the new wall as shown in Attachment PC 6. Several items have been taken into consideration in reviewing this matter: 1) The existing private improvement does not presently diminish the rights of the public along the Private Road right-of-way; 2) There are no existing City utilities within the encroachment area; and 3) Approval would require the Owners to enter into an Encroachment Agreement so as to allow the existing improvement to remain as requested, and any liability associated with the existing private improvement would be is transferred to the Owners. Additionally, if the need for sidewalks or public improvements should arise in the future, Owners have agreed to remove all encroachments, at no cost to the City. Staff has reviewed this request and supports this policy waiver. In staff’s review of the existing site conditions, the existing improvements do not hinder the use of the public right 5 LaFrance and Baram Residence Encroachment Permit Planning Commission, October 18, 2018 Page 4 of way, including sidewalks. The retention of the private improvement will not diminish the rights of the public, present and future, at this location. The site is within the Coastal Zone and retaining the existing wall does not require a Coastal Development Permit as the wall was constructed prior to the Coastal Act with the development of the tract in the late 1950s. Should the Planning Commission elect to approve the waiver and retention of the private improvements and appurtenances, staff recommends that the Planning Commission require the Owners to enter into an encroachment agreement with the City consistent with the Policy. The encroachment agreement specifies the rights of the City including future removals and the responsibilities of the property owners. The encroachment agreement would be recorded onto the property’s title and provides important notice and protections for the City and for the current and future property owners. Environmental Review This project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. Public Notice The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act, at least 10 days in advance of the meeting at which the Planning Commission considers the item. Prepared by: Submitted by: Abby Cooke Assistant Engineer Jim Campbell Deputy Community Development Director ATTACHMENTS PC 1 Draft Resolution with Findings and Conditions PC 2 City Council Staff Report Dated August 8, 2017 PC 3 City Council Meeting Minutes Dated August 8, 2017 PC 4 Council Policy L-6 6 Attachment No. PC 1 Draft Resolution with Findings and Conditions 7 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE8 RESOLUTION NO. PC2018-030 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENCROACHMENT PERMIT N2018-0471 FOR A REQUEST TO RETAIN AN EXISTING IMPROVEMENT WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED AT 2209 PRIVATE ROAD THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FACTS. 1. An application was filed by Craig LaFrance and Tallie Baram (collectively, “Applicant”), with respect to property located at 2209 Private Road, Newport Beach, California requesting approval of an encroachment permit. 2. The Applicant requests to retain an existing non-compliant improvement within the Private Road public right-of-way including a six (6) foot high concrete retaining wall that encroaches up to five point five (5.5) inches into the public right-of-way. 3. The requested encroachment is not specifically provided within City Council Policy L-6, thus, the requested encroachment is prohibited under Section A(1) of said policy. Due to this prohibition, the requested encroachment may only be approved upon review and approval of the Planning Commission. 4. A public meeting was held on October 18, 2018, in the City Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach. A notice of time, place and purpose of the hearing was given in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the Planning Commission at this hearing. 5. The subject property is located within the coastal zone. The existing wall was constructed with the development of the tract prior to the Coastal Act and is exempt from a Coastal Development Permit Requirement. SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DETERMINATION. This action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. SECTION 3. REQUIRED FINDINGS. In accordance with City Council Policy L-6, Encroachments in the Public Rights-of-Way, the following findings and facts in support of such findings are set forth: 9 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2018-030 Page 2 of 4 Finding: A. The existing private improvement does not presently diminish the rights of the public along the Private Road right-of-way. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The existing improvement does not hinder the present or future use of the public right-of-way, including sidewalks, and there are no existing City utilities located within the encroachment area. 2. The existing private improvement does not impede coastal public access, degrade visual quality of public coastal view, or have any potential impact to sensitive habitat in the Coastal Zone for the following reasons: a. The existing private improvement is within the Private Road public right-of- way. b. Private Road is not a coastal view road as designated by the Local Coastal Plan. c. The existing private improvement does not impede public vehicular or pedestrian access. d. The existing private improvement does not impede access to City utilities. Finding: B. The individual circumstances applicable to this application and the proposed encroachment are consistent with the public interest. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The existing improvement supports adjacent slope and allows for pedestrian access to the Private Road sidewalk and parkway area. SECTION 4. DECISION. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach hereby approves Encroachment Permit N2018-0471, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 2. This action shall become final and effective fourteen (14) days following the date this Resolution was adopted unless within such time an appeal or call for review is filed with 10 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2018-030 Page 3 of 4 the City Clerk in accordance with the provisions of Title 20 Planning and Zoning, of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 18th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2018. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: BY:_________________________ Peter Zak, Chairman BY:_________________________ Secretary 11 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2018-030 Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT “A” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The proposed encroachment shall be in substantial conformance with the approved site plan stamped and dated with the date of this approval. (Except as modified by applicable conditions of approval.) 2. The proposed encroachment is subject to all applicable City ordinances, policies, and standards, unless specifically waived or modified by the conditions of approval. 3. The Applicant shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws. Material violation of any of those laws in connection with the use may be cause for revocation of this Encroachment Permit and any associated Encroachment Agreements. 4. The Applicant shall enter into an Encroachment Agreement within one (1) calendar year upon receipt of approval, otherwise this approval shall automatically expire. 5. The existing wall has several cracks and the wall shall be repaired and then maintained in a safe condition. 6. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Applicant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its City Council, its boards and commissions, officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses (including without limitation, attorney’s fees, disbursements and court costs) of every kind and nature whatsoever which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to City’s approval of LaFrance and Baram Residence Encroachment Permit including, but not limited to, Encroachment Permit No. N2018-0471. This indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, damages awarded against the City, if any, costs of suit, attorneys' fees, and other expenses incurred in connection with such claim, action, causes of action, suit or proceeding whether incurred by Applicant, City, and/or the parties initiating or bringing such proceeding. The Applicant shall indemnify the City for all of City's costs, attorneys’ fees, and damages which City incurs in enforcing the indemnification provisions set forth in this condition. The Applicant shall pay to the City upon demand any amount owed to the City pursuant to the indemnification requirements prescribed in this condition. 12 Attachment No. PC 2 City Council Staff Report Dated August 8, 2017 13 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE14 _-1  NEWPORT BEACH   City Council Staff Report  CITY OF  August 8, 2017 Agenda Item No. __ ABSTRACT: The property owner of 2209 Private Road (Owner) is requesting a waiver of City Council Policy L-6 to maintain an existing six-foot high concrete retaining wall within the public right-of-way on Private Road. RECOMMENDATION: a) Determine that the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly; b) Waive Council Policy L-6, Private Encroachments in the Public Rights-of-Way, to allow the existing six-foot high concrete block wall and appurtenances that encroach into the Private Road public right-of-way to remain in place, contingent upon all conditions of the Encroachment Permit process being met; and c) Direct staff to enter into an Encroachment Agreement with the Owner and authorize the City Manager and City Clerk to execute the Encroachment Agreement within one (1) calendar year upon receipt of approval; or d) Provide other direction to staff. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: There is no fiscal impact related to this item. DISCUSSION: The Owner of 2209 Private Road is requesting a waiver of City Council Policy L-6 to maintain an existing six-foot high concrete wall within the Private Road public right-of-way. The public right-of-way extends 10 feet behind the existing curb. The existing retaining wall is located at TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: David A. Webb, Public Works Director – 949-644-3311, dawebb@newportbeachca.gov PREPARED BY: Antony Brine, City Traffic Engineer tbrine@newportbeachca.gov PHONE: 949-644-3329 TITLE: Request for Waiver of City Council Policy L-6 at 2209 Private Road 15 Request for Waiver of City Council Policy L-6 at 2209 Private Road August 8, 2017 Page 2 _-2 the back of the existing sidewalk, approximately 9 feet from the back of curb. The existing wall encroaches approximately one foot into the public right-of-way. Public Works has no records of the date of construction of the wall. City Council Policy L-6 was adopted on August 25, 1969. Private Road was built in 1959. City Council Policy L-6, “Public Encroachments in Public Rights-of-Way” explains and describes how the public rights-of-way are to be reserved for public use or open space; and that the rights of the public, present and future, are not to be diminished by the installation of private improvements within the public rights-of-way. The Policy specifies allowable and prohibited encroachments and describes the required permits or encroachment agreements. In Section A, which outlines the general encroachment prohibitions, structural encroachments including fences, walls, patios, raised planters, etc., that exceed 3 feet in height are prohibited. The Owner is requesting City Council consideration for waiver of this policy to allow an existing encroachment to maintain the existing six-foot high retaining wall. In staff’s review, the existing wall does not affect the walking pathway. The requested action would not diminish the rights of the public, present and future at that location regarding the sidewalk. As an alternative direction, the City Council could require Property Owner, as part of their proposed home replacement project, to either: 1. Remove the existing 6’ high block wall currently within the City right-of-way, and construct any new walls outside the public right-of-way; or 2. Cut the existing 6’ high block wall (currently within the City right-of-way) down to a level below 3’ in height to comply with Council Policy L-6 (A1), (i.e. encroachments shall not exceed 3 feet in height), contingent upon the property owner entering into a City Encroachment Agreement allowing said encroachment. Should the City Council elect to approve the waiver and maintain the existing wall, staff recommends that the City Council require the Owner to enter into an encroachment agreement with the City. The encroachment agreement specifies the rights of the City including future removals, Hold Harmless and the responsibilities of the Owner. The encroachment agreement is recorded onto the property’s title and provides important notice and protections for the City and for the current and future property owners. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Staff recommends the City Council find this action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment), and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it will not result in a physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. 16 Request for Waiver of City Council Policy L-6 at 2209 Private Road August 8, 2017 Page 3 _-3 NOTICING: The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the City Council considers the item). ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A - Project Site Plan Attachment B - Location Map Attachment C - City Council Policy L-6 Attachment D - Property Photograph 17 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE18 Attachment No. PC 3 City Council Meeting Minutes Dated August 8, 2017 19 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Attachment No. PC 4 Council Policy L-6 31 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Attachment No. PC 5 Site Plan 45 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE46 PC 547 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE48 Attachment No. PC 6 Site Photos 49 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE50 PC 6 51