Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03_Public Comments_Additional MaterialsGeneral Plan Update Steering Committee - April 3, 2019 Item Nos. 3, 4a, 4b, 4c and 4d Additional Materials Received From: Zdeba, Benjamin To: Lee. Amanda Cc: Ramirez, Brittany Subject: FW: Written comments on GPU Steering Committee agenda items (4/3/2019) Date: Tuesday, April 02, 2019 4:05:57 PM Attachments: 2019ADr03 GPU Steerina Committee Aaenda Comments JimMosher.Ddf image001.pnno Hi Amanda, Please see attached comments received on Item Nos. III, IV.a, IV.b, IV.c, and IV.d for the GPUSC meeting tomorrow evening. Thanks, Ben Z. BENJAMIN M. ZDEBA, AICP Community Development Department Associate Planner bzdeba(a)newoortbeachca. aov 949-644-3253 From: Jim Mosher <jimmosher@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2019 3:40 PM To: Campbell, Jim <JCampbell@newportbeachca.gov>; Zdeba, Benjamin <bzdeba@new portbeachca.gov> Subject: Written comments on GPU Steering Committee agenda items (4/3/2019) Please find attached some comments I have BCC'd to the Newport Beach General Plan Update Steering Committee members for their consideration at their April 3, 2019, meeting. Yours sincerely, Jim Mosher General Plan Update Steering Committee - April 3, 2019 Item Nos. 3, 4a, 4b, 4c and 4d Additional Materials Received April 3, 2019, GPU Steering Committee Comments These comments on Newport Beach General Plan Update Steering Committee agenda items are submitted by: Jim Mosher ( limmosher(o-)yahoo.com ), 2210 Private Road, Newport Beach 92660 Item Ill. Public Comments (non -agenda items) I continue to think it would be helpful for Committee members to review Item 14 from the March 26, 2019, City Council meeting. It reports on the current status of the General Plan's Implementation Program and Housing Element. At that meeting, I incorrectly stated the report failed to address the extent to which our GP is out of alignment with the current State Guidelines, but in fact it does — under Imp. 1.3. In that connection, it seems interesting to note that Implementation Program 29 of the current GP (page 13-31) is entitled "Community Involvement." It is also interesting to note that under that heading the then -existing General Plan Advisory Committee seems to be regarded as something of continuing relevance after adoption. Among the City activities under Imp 29.1 ("Educate the Community") of special relevance to the present committee might be the Planning Commission's aborted February 8, 2018, discussion regarding residential development standards in the Cliff Haven community (Item 4) — a kind of early "listen and learn" effort cancelled hours before it was scheduled to begin due to an excess of interest by people from other parts of the city, with a promise (see cancellation notice) that it (like many other things) would be wrapped into the GP Update process. Under Imp 29.2 ("Support of the Arts, Culture, and Historic Resources"), it is unclear if the promise to define procedures to review requests to modify or demolish historic resources was ever followed through on. The status report linked to above is uninformative on that, as well as on the status of many other promises made in the Implementation Program. One good thing is that with the City's posting of the all -in -one -PDF version of the General Plan, it is easier than ever to determine where these various implementation programs are cited in the body of the GP to support its policies and strategies. Curiously, Adobe's search function is unable to find any citations to Imp 29.3 ("Support Community Environmental and Recreation Initiatives") — even in places where its application seems obvious, as in LU 6.3.2 ("Acquisition for Open Space"). Item IVA Review Minutes of the March 20, 2019 Meeting The following corrections are suggested: Page 1, Item II (WELCOME AND ROLL CALL), paragraph 1: "All Committee Members present." (It is important that the names of the persons present be listed, as was done in the Feb. 20 and Mar. 6 minutes. People come and go on committees. It would be extremely difficult for someone reading this at a future time to determine with any certainty who were and were not members of the Steering Committee on March 20. It is also customary to list the participating staff members present at City meetings, as was done in the earlier minutes.)