HomeMy WebLinkAbout04b_Proposal Score Sheet_RFP#19-69May10,2019
General Plan Update Steering Committee
Nancy Gardner, Chair
Jim Carlson
Catherine O 'Hara
Ed Selich
Debbie Stevens
Larry Tucker
Paul Watkins
Mayor Diane Dixon, Ex Officio Member
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
100 Civic Center Drive
Newport Beach , California 92660
949 644-3200
newportbeachca .gov/communitydevelopment
RE: Proposal Evaluations on Request for Proposals (RFP) No . 19-69
Community Engagement Related to a Future General Plan Update
Dear Chair Gardner and Steering Committee Members ,
Staff has completed its technical evaluation of the four remaining proposers . A composite score sheet is
attached and followed by individual scoring sheets . The corresponding technical evaluation ranking from
highest ranking proposer to lowest ranking proposer is as follows :
1 . Kearns & West
2 . MBI Strategic Communication
3 . S Groner Associates
4 . FSB Core Strategies
If you have any questions , please contact me at 949-644-3253 or by email at
bzdeba@newportbeachca.gov .
Thank you and see you next week .
Sincerely,
Community Development Department
MBI Strategic
Composite Score FSB Core Strategies Kearns & West Communication S Groner Associates
Qualifications and Experience -60%
Qualifications and experience of the proposing
Consultant firm or team conducting similar projects, of
27 52 42 32 comparable complexity, and magnitude, particularly for
government agencies.
Understanding of Scope and Ability to Perform -30%
A demonstrated understanding of the requested scope
of services or work program and the ability to deploy
13 28 23 18 services as identified in the scope of services or work
program.
References -10%
Recent references from local clients with particular 5 10 10 5 emphasis on local government.
TOTAL SCORE (OUT OF 100): 45 90 75 55
Benjamin Zdeba
MBI Strategic
FSB Core Strategies Kearns & West Communication S Groner Associates
Qualifications and Experience -60%
Qualifications and experience of the proposing
Consultant firm or team conducting similar projects, of 30 55 50 35 comparable complexity, and magnitude, particularly for
government agencies.
Understanding of Scope and Ability to Perform -30%
A demonstrated understanding of the requested scope
of services or work program and the ability to deploy 15 30 25 20 services as identified in the scope of services or work
program.
References -10%
Recent references from local clients with particular
5 10 10 5 emphasis on local government.
TOTAL SCORE (OUT OF 100): 50 95 85 60
Jim Campbell
MBI Strategic
FSB Core Strategies Kearns & West Communication S Groner Associates
Qualifications and Experience -60%
Qualifications and experience af the proposing
Consultant firm ar team conducting similar projects, of 25 50 40 30 comparable complexity, and magnitude, particularly for
government agencies .
Understanding of Scope and Ability to Perform -30%
A demonstrated understanding of the requested scope
of services or work program and the ability to deploy 15 30 25 20 services as identified in the scape of services or work
program.
References -10%
Recent references from local clients with particular 5 10 10 5 emphasis on local government.
TOTAL SCORE (OUT OF 100): 45 90 75 55
Seimone Jurjis
MBI Strategic
FSB Core Strategies Kearns & West Communication S Groner Associates
Qualifications and Experience -60%
Qualifications and experience of the proposing
Con sultant firm or team conducting similar projects, of 25 50 35 30 comparable complexity, and magnitude, particularly for
government agencies.
Understanding of Scope and Ability to Perform -30%
A demonstrated understanding of the requested scope
of services or work program and the ability to deploy 10 25 20 15 services as identified in the scope of services or work
program.
References -10% '· i
Recent references from local clients with particular 5 10 10 5 emphasis on local government.
TOTAL SCORE (OUT OF 100): 40 85 65 50