HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/24/2000 - Study SessionCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
City Council Minutes
Study Session
October 24, 2000 - 5:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Thomson, Glover, Adams, Ridgeway, O'Neil, Mayor Noyes
Absent: Debay (excused)
Due to mechanical problems with the recording equipment, the following
Study Session minutes is a recap of the actions /discussions that took place.
1. CLARIFICATION OF ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR
City Clerk Harkless clarified that the proposed ordinances for Agenda Item
No. 4 (Modification to Adult Entertainment Ordinance) and Agenda Item
No. 5 (Amendments to NBMC Section 12.56 Regarding Bicycles) would
become effective 30 days after adoption.
2. BUILDING AND PLANNING PLAN CHECK ACTIVITY AND
STAFFING UPDATE.
Council Member O'Neil stated that he was contacted by an architect who
was complaining that he had to take a number and wait in line for an
extended period of time to pick up plans. Council Member Ridgeway added
that people coming in to view microfilm records had the same experience
and, since the Building Department greets everyone who comes in,
individuals seeking planning information may wait awhile before being
served. Building Director Elbettar indicated that they monitor the time
customers wait and changed the system from numbers to a written log which
enables people to list the purpose of the visit. He stated that any staff
looking at the log scans it to see if anyone is waiting for Planning staff and
directs them to the Planning counter. He added that a change was
implemented a week ago which utilizes two sign in sheets, one for small
tasks such as picking up plans and one for permit issuance and plan
submittals.
Mr. Elbettar reviewed the Building Department's activity history as outlined
in the staff report and emphasized that, for the past four years, the plan
check workload has been at an all time high due to the higher customer
service demand at the permit counter and the departure of one of the
engineers. He added that, in conjunction with the reorganization of the
Marine Division in July 2000, the Building Department also assumed
responsibility for the plan check and record keeping for construction within
the Harbor. He stated that, while the Building Department target
turnaround time is three weeks, it has fallen to 4.5 weeks which is closer to
the Planning Department's turnaround time of 6 to 7 weeks.
Volume 53 - Page 643
INDEX
Building and
Plan Check
Activity and
Update (26)
City of Newport Beach
Study Session Minutes
October 24, 2000
IIUI)D►1
Mr. b1bettar reviewed the measures that have been taken to keep up with
the increased workload. He explained that the department hired four plan
check consultants for overflow plan checks, but noted that customers prefer
that their drawings be checked in -house and prefer dealing with familiar
City staff. He reported that the department has also used the expedited plan
check service to check small projects like additions and alternations.
However, since this service has been popular with the rise in construction
activity, they have not been able to accommodate every request. He stated
that the engineers have also been authorized to work overtime on regular
plan checks to keep up with the workload. Further, since the Building
Department plan check is done about two weeks before the Planning
Department plan check, they resorted to releasing their corrections before
the Planning Department's so customers can work on resolving these
corrections while the planning plan check is in progress. While this measure
helped customers, it created additional customer service work at the permit
counter.
Mr. Elbettar reported that the annexation of Newport Coast, Bay Knolls, and
Santa Ana Heights will increase the City's building stock by 15 %. Due to the
sustained high construction activity and the discontent of our customers with
plan check consultants, the Building Department proposed during the budget
process that the previously cancelled grading engineer position be filled by a
plan check engineer position. Filling this plan check engineer position and
restoring the number of plan check engineers to four is necessary even when
the volume of construction neutralizes since the Building Department is also
doing the plan checks for fire alarms, fire sprinklers, and harbor construction.
Mr. Elbettar stated that, in addition to the customer service enhancements
outlined in the staff report, staff also conducts standard plan sheets for
window replacements, fences, and drainage work; has an overnight mail
back service; conducts one week turnaround plan checks for tenant
improvements; provides a counter computer for public access; conducts
preliminary code reviews; includes image attachments to complaints in the
permit system; has a call back program for inspections; and utilizes cell
phone communication between contractors and inspection staff.
In response to Council questions regarding the back log and the reasons why
it takes so long to process plans, Mr. Elbettar stated that construction
activity has increased over the last three years and staff is under pressure to
fulfill the commitments they have made. He indicated that adding
consultants does not provide a complete relief since staff still has to process
plans and answer questions at the counter.
Planning Director Temple reviewed the staff report and explained that the
public service counter is the citizen's first source of information for zoning
regulations and project compliance. She noted that plans are more complex
than in prior years; and requirements, conditions of approval, and
environmental mitigation measures attached to discretionary permits has
increased. This has significantly increased the time it takes to complete plan
checks for most projects.
Volume 53 - Page 644
L
City of Newport Beach
Study Session Minutes
October 24, 2000
Ms. Temple acknowledged that the plan check turnaround time in the
Planning Department has been running about 7 weeks for some time. She
stated that this is not acceptable, either to our customers who should be able
to expect timely service, or to the staff who is motivated to provide both
timely and high quality service. Because of this, the Planning Department is
requesting Council consideration to add an additional full-time staff position
for the plan check function.
Ms. Temple also recommended that consideration be given to adjusting the
recovery rate to 100% rather than 50% of the fully loaded hourly rate for
providing plan check services. This would offset a significant portion of the
cost of the additional plan check position. She added that most planning and
community development departments in the region charge an hourly rate for
planning services which allows them to recover a higher percentage of the
cost.
Following discussion, Council directed staff to bring back a report at the next
regular meeting that would add Planning Department staff and
modifications to the ordinance regarding the percentage of the rate of
recovery for plan check services.
3. STUDY SESSION ON CABLE TELEVISION AND
TELECOMMUNICATIONS.
Deputy City Manager Kiff pointed out that staff is recommending that
Council form an ad hoc committee on cable television and
telecommunications to address the issues and accomplish the tasks outlined
in the staff report.
Mr. Kiff reported that the municipal code relating to telecommunications is
outdated and requires significant amendments before the City can enter into
any effective franchise agreement or use permit with providers of cable
television or wireless communication. He indicated that both the Comcast
and Cox franchise agreements expire on January 27, 2002, and that the
existing agreements, from about 1966, contain information and
requirements that may have been superceded by Federal action in 1996. He
indicated that the ad hoc committee should work with staff to update the
City's cable television ordinance and create a separate telecommunications
ordinance that addresses wireless services, street encroachment fees, City
infrastructure use fees, and sites for antennas.
Mr. Kiff reported that the Comcast and Cox franchise agreements will also
need renegotiating once the ordinances are adopted. He pointed out that
other cities have told them that it is "virtually impossible" to deny a
franchise agreement to an existing provider who seeks a renewal unless the
provider has seriously compromised service or has demonstrated an inability
to provide the level of service expected by the community. He added that the
cable lines, amplifiers, node infrastructure, etcetera (also known as the
"plant ") that are in streets and on telephone wires are the property of the
cable company, not the City. He emphasized that an important part of any
franchise renewal is the preparation of a Community Needs Assessment. A
Needs Assessment is an analysis, based on extensive public input, of the
Volume 53 - Page 645
.IPi�1 .
Cable TV and
Telecommunications
(42)
City of Newport Beach
Study Session Minutes
October 24, 2000
television, high -speed data, service standard, and cable - related
telecommunications needs of the community. The City needs to begin
planning and convening this Needs Assessment right away so that it is
completed in time for franchise renewal talks.
Mr. Kiff reported that Comcast will soon be leaving Southern California
after swapping its local customer base with Adelphia Communications.
Therefore, residents in about 2 /3rds of Newport Beach will have a new cable
television provider. He indicated that they plan to inquire with
Comcast/Adelphia as to Adelphia's plans to communicate the transfer of
service from Comcast. Further, they also plan to direct Comcast/Adelphia to
provide critical information about pending transfers to subscribers in a
timely manner, including local phone numbers and bill payment/service
office information.
Mr. Kiff reported that residents have seen a series of significant cable rate
increases and that they have been higher in recent years than the rate of
inflation. He noted that there has been non - existent or modest price
increases on the Limited Basic Tier (LBT) of channels (typically Channels 2
to 13) and indicated that local governments retain the ability to regulate this
tier. He reported that, with the Cable Programming Services Tier (CPST)
rate deregulation in March 1999, the City has no direct authority to review
or regulate CPST rates. Mr. Kiff recommended that the ad hoc committee
explain the City's regulatory ability, or lack thereof, to the community
through the Community Needs Assessment process. Further, the ad hoc
committee should also develop a Council policy relating to the manner in
which the City reviews and approves requests for telecommunications
infrastructure easements.
PUBLIC COMMENTS - None.
ADJOURNMENT - 6:00 p.m
x��, r, trrr,rxx� * +r�+,r +t +xxx *t,rtxtrr
The agenda for the Study Session was posted on October 18, 2000, at
3:20 p.m on the City Hall Bulletin Board located outside of the City of
Newport Beach Administration Building.
City Clerk
Vc
a &ml
Recording Secretary
�
I i�ll7bl;�