Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0_The Garden Office and Parking Structure_PA2019-023_2_Attachments 6-7 Attachment No. PC 6 Public Comments 20S V� QP �P LS architects LAIDLAW SCHULTZ 3111 Second Avenue Corona del Mar.CA 92625-2322 T:(9491 645-9982 F:1949)645-9554 w:Barchifecls.com ��pE1VED BY October 9, 2019 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Newport Beach Planning Commissioners 0cj 0 9 2019 Makana Nova, Associate Planner City of Newport Beach Once Civic Center OITYOF Newport Beach, CA 92660 NFWRgRt OEPC'� Re: Coastal Development Permit No. CD2019-3 (PA2019-23), 215 Riverside Avenue; Community Outreach We received the attached 148 letters of support for the proposed project located at 215 Riverside Avenue. 115 letters were signed by Newport Beach residents and the 32 additional letters from residents of nearby communities who enjoy the beautiful Garden center adjacent to 215 Riverside.The majority of these letters of support were as a result of outreach to residents by a project representative sitting at a table in the courtyard of the Garden center several hours a day from late September 2019 through early October 2019. The attached exhibits were on display where the representative sat so that all were informed about the project. Folks approached the representative and engaged in conversation about the current structure and the proposed project located at 215 Riverside. At the end of the conversation, if appropriate, the representative inquired if the individual would be willing to sign a letter of support. We also held an open house on July 21, 2019. Invitations were sent to property owners and residential occupants within 300' radius of the project. In conclusion, we have conducted significant community outreach and received very positive feedback for a project that adds parking, is less intense and more visually attractive than the existing use and adds to the property tax base of the city. Furthermore, the property owner has invested significant resources in quality architecture and construction materials that enhances the values for all in the Scott Laidlaw Laidlaw Schultz Architects Applicant for 215 Riverside r Is: Attachments: Letters of Support, Exhibit 205 ,vTiaa�a dx $',�+y'�+�'Aa "4 t J'6Y t ell rij r ��ry{rl� •�ISY..��'t'T%.F`H"v.•'sA����y,M1�� �1\k422 P�'° 5 , •Y� F^fir n i\r � iwr�i.YS'�'r'��" *�"�d n`P'i4ib tay�.•;_,sroysy.'� L+�� is ni „ L,il , . I � ' !•5�.":,.�g WL.�. �— "Y—``l1c'tx 41+ee �""�c5�'� a_�3-•���.��9- � ...: �,`� OR- �y 4 I �� C '✓i'�t�t'''yy' � Aq -vY Yf, 'F3 a �h r$:F .. �✓ g4*9.�'iltti r +�'i��A"`i c °yt�tY . .. ✓','T_-`�r�"�.ate,\ter M VS�y {���Y r � � v�ror { IT` ,r r p � IY � - 1 Community Outreach Exhibits rgx. �y i �h'k' y E 40XIM - lyY� �ia �'eyq.{V �AP kyy, a `i' cX z�i �t Ui4t ° R y tad s$s4 !a Er,rta fi 9"tr it df+3�it 1 I- i r 1M,ttt�.�.rtr"'S i % - �'� w i 215 Riverside Redevelopment The proposed redevelopment replaces the existing non-conforming 8,056 sf.Ihree-story mixed-use building and two-level parking,currently in disrepair.with a new much smaller 2,744 A.two story professional office building with attached two level parking. Project Highlights D. Conforms to all city zoning requirements(height,setbacks,parking,etc.) ► Discontinuation of currently permitted on site restaurant use N. Overall reduction in intensity of use by reducing area and limiting new use to professional office only ► 65%reduction in building area from 8,056 sf.(existing(to 2,744 St.(proposed) IN. 55%reduction in building street frontage(mass)from 1601t. to 75 ft. P. 33%reduction in site coverage(building plus parking]from 13,750 sf.to 9,225 sf. ► 15017increase in landscaped area from 2,765 sf.to 7.065 sl. ► Addition of 200 sf of street landscape where none currently exists ► 145%reduction in unscreened parking spaces from 16 existing to 5 proposed ► Removal of all existing construction within the adjacent parkland and restoration of the hillside ► Pedestrian friendly design and ground level access to both the building and the parking P. Much safer parking design with reduced ramp slopes and significant improvement of sight lines for vehicles exiling onto Riverside i Ike 6ar en "Cuntuiuiug the cfYo1 of improving iblarinccs Vlilc,by working rloecly with the city of Nrwpurt and il,rc�i.0p'BY PcoMtaurttty pEV�1.C1PM�'NT , Mayor Diane Dixon QC g 2p19 ddixon@newportbeachca.gov Cha ir Peter Koetting Ott+of $ poetting@newportbeachca.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure, adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height, setback,etc.). Additionally, 1 am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. .The Garden development is beautifiil,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, 1 ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name -A L l2 Address O� r City, State,Zip Code C12(,(e3 Email Phone t . ��g tke 6ar en "Cmitinuing the effortof improvinA;\•tare nets Mile,by working closely with the city of Kewpu❑.nvl its;'teni deuce" Mayor Diane Dixon ddixon@newportbeachca.gov ��CgtVED By TY Chair Peter Koetting COMPd�Nt pEVEI OPMENf poetting@newportbeachca.gov O 9 Z019 Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov Otic®p CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach et�f 9�PG Mova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name ; Address �7 S'1.V, City,State,Zip Code—F ? J ,.I_C Email Phone ��9 the 6-arlden "Confinui ng the effoiI of improving Mariners iLlile,by working closely with the city of iVewpnrt and its wsidentc" Mayor Diane Dixon OCEIVED e1, ddixon@newportbeachca.gov COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Chair Peter Koetting OCT 09 204 pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission CITY OF PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov �'0gT ®�Ppds CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely,, J Name \Ci ,aai Address �7� �'c��_ t? f\"-j-VettrtnQ 0 City,State,Zip Code Email Phone 2j D the bar en "i'unfiIIt.im;the of oo of iulprminq I\{,u'inw-a 1\diIv,I,v tvnd<inf,do,;Oy wiIh IhV city nl NtWpul'I and i(..nr:o(fi. Mayor Diane Dixon ��p81VED By ddixon@newportbeachca.gov COMMUNITY Chair Peter Koetting DEVELOPMENT poetting@newportbeachca.gov OCT 0 9 2019 Newport Beach Planning Commission CITY OF PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov � CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach PORT Str-MNova@ncwportboachca.gov MNova@ncwportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, 1 am highly appreciative ofthe added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. 'rhe Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name Address �� City, State,Gip Code Email Phone ��1 he � arc�en "(bnliiutnlg Ibc itl f(W of implovinp,111ui nC!T i\dilo,by ivwki.%do Scly•.yilh lhr City of \l•a'Inul.md it+m+idcnh' 0CgIVEO BY Mayor Diane Dixon COMMUNITY ddixon@newportbeachca.gov DEVELOPMENT Chair Peter Koetting OCT 0 9 Z019 pkoetting@newportbeachea.gov CITY OF Newport Beach Planning Commission /� ° PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov -to.. CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. 1 am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, 1 ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name � oy-V-A V)e CCAV—Soy\ Address SAA E)eAa-nGtwJ{ 1\p, Ave, /,� City, State,Zip Code N-eQOfOil— �jP/n�l.. C(� /�1 ,�'IG�tII Email Phone Ike Garden „0,Ili nuinl the cII on of improving,NbIi it!rs NaiII.,byworkiln,dncrly with lhr ril y of Nrnhml'1nd il':is<idrnl.` , BY G�v�6 N(Ct coMMOQM 0N'S Mayor Diane Dixon O's4OV: 0\tj ddixon@newportbeachca.gov Chair Peter Koetting t OT- pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov ®�,P Newport Beach Planning Commission Newpoo PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newporibeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, NameK`� L ry Address L 2O ( (V E- -SVA Yly, E, City, State,Zip Code �� C A t C( Email Phone the 6ar en "Con(in ning(he afor(of improving Mariners Nlile,by wor!ainty cloPcly with the city of Newport and i(5 residvoI ,EIVED aY Mayor Diane Dixon COMMUNITY ddixon@newportbeachca.gov DEVELQPMENT Chair Peter Koetting 9 20A9 pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov OIV OF Newport Beach Planning Commission p0� PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov N�VRORT ®� CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. "Ilse Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, CC Name — y" Address � / LLi D� City,State,Zip Code y&C-V C Email Phone Ike Garden "Cont in it i ng III::i(I'mt of it,it)I'UY inn N'Iit fl IICIs IVI I IC,bt.mlrI(i n.0 chmeI)'Wit IIItie MY Of^;cn'pw l:mJ ill.Cli&LI t'.. Mayor Diane Dixon ��,SXVED By ddixon@newportbeachea.gov CDMMuNITY DEVEL@PMENT Chair Peter Koetting 9 ZQ�9 pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission CITY of: $ P]an ningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeach ca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, `1 (� 1 Name, \-\rY. �( > Address City, State,Zip Code Email Phone Ike Garden 't mitinu in,ll Ihr effort of impnrving MarifivI+&I i lc,hj working do,oly with Ilx city of Nvwpuil and iI,i,,idrn I,' Mayor Diane Dixon OsCEIVED el, ddixon@newportbeachca.gov COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Chair Peter Koetting OCT 0 9 2019 pkoetting@newponbeachca.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission CITY OF PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov 44Ip®BI B�pox" CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city coning requirements (heigh(setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, tl Name Q n Address I I` City, State,Zip Code Q / -a. Email Phone the �arcentinuing Ihe.effolI of improving Merii,os Mile,by woilcing closely with III city of Newport and it',tisuh:n t5' Mayor Diane Dixon ddixon@newportbeachca.gov Chair Peter Koetting pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, ((( Name � I��� PA f Address , L(1J_I l! U City,State,Zip Code Email Phon the 6ar en "l'unfinuin.;lhr.'trot(of iml,ruvin�i�1arn+rrti I1'iiLr,by nvirl:ia�doc,ly'irilh the tih,nl'�e�+l�n't an,l iP:,•.i dvnl>.. Mayor Diane Dixon 9 2p\9 ddixon@newportbeachca.gov ®C( Chair Peter Koetting Gt�t Of poetting@newportbeachea.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, 1 currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Plan ' g ommi sie to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, /f Name A�rJ Address 2ZZ Za 6 dM& City,State,Zip Code N, - CA g7.O(UT;2 Email Phone 2j 8 Ike Garden 'Cbnl i nu in the efLirl III improving,NI.I.iner<IINI i IV,by wIll ki[I�closely wish the city of t+le,vpprl an,I it,It^tidvnla" 00�tUNt13 � Mayor Diane Dixon ppM M�N� ddixon@newportbeachca.gov Chair Peter Koetting pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov of Newport Beach Planning Commission dyop(d PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Namee— Address City,State,Zip Code Email Phone Ike 6arJen "Continuing the el furls(improving Mariners Mile,by WO,I,ing closely with t he ci IV nr N2wporl and iI wSideniti" D BY '00 T4ty Mayor Diane Dixon COM O DNS pgVE PM ddixon@newportbeachea.gov Chair Peter Koetting ®F pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov Newport Beach Planning CommissionWP®4R®F,P PlanningCommissionem@newportbeachea.gov CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name J (�/ nr" �jo X Address n City,State,Zip Code Email Phone 2g0 the 6ar en IItinuine,IIIr WoI t of impruvin;\lariners NJHLl ,by rourl+m{ 'IosvI; �vil,'I Ipc iit} 41Nol,:part earl i;,rv_:;iJ.nl " GEtVED By . OOMMUNt StA T DEVEt'OPM Mayor Diane Dixon O 2Q�9 ddixon@newportbeachca.gov Chair Peter Koetting poetting@newportbeachca.gov P° �VVPORS®� Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely,Name 1 p'it r o y6•✓\11C e r g Address " O H 'L M City,State,Zip Code w P v r V 1] L4 G CA L L 961 Email Phone 2g1 the Garden "C,'nntinairy;the eflbrl of iinpruving,blarine,:Mile,by world ng clo9lly milli the cirg of V.,vi'mi ao.l iI rrsidlvd" �GoptIED By CCMMdNITY Mayor Diane Dixon pEVEt CPMENT ddixon@newportbeachca.gov D�j p 9 2019 Chair Peter Koetting pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov CtT t ov Newport Beach Planning Commission 4ZWpGff 1400 PlanningCoirimissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name ! AddressU City, State,Zip Code �_ .�`\ r C� q 2 Email Phone �g� he arc en "l;untinuin�the cl'rurl of improving bleriuce;,,\7ile,by tvnrkhm,clot+av wilh thr t'ih'�H�etvlml dnJ ii'<rr::idcnP' G<;1VED By Mayor Diane Dixon ooMM�N� ddixon@newportbeachca.gov DEVEUAPt�ENj Chair Peter Koetting pC1 Zp19 pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov ot't'Y®E Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov 4*Wpoftt 0 I CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. 1 think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, r' I Name I!� A. Address LTab. City, State,Zip Code Email Phone vmff��� �g3 Ike Garden "t nn tine ing thr vfforl ,f iugouvil%Niacineis IN ile,by working.clo,ely wilh ilie,:ily of\'ewpwt m d il',i,^udenly;.. G,\VED By Mayor Diane Dixon @�oMN1UN\'� ddixon@newportbeachca.gov CO OpMENS Chair Peter Koetting OCR 9 2p19 pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov ACL t A� , Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov h yt ptt CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, / Name SIB Gl /� CZ S f'!c ZO, Address �I City,State,Zip Code 3 Email Phone 2g-�f I the Garden "C.mtiIt.in,the efurt of im proving%IaI i lie IsMile.bywurl:ing r.IocclyI,it It the city•,'r���cw�urt nr1(It•.n•5iJ•au ' Mayor Diane Dixon 000\\JD By y ddixon@newportbeachca.gov COMU NT DEVEL©PM� Chair Peter Koetting ®9 jo19 pkoetting@newportbeachea.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission 6tt t®¢ PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov ftl1/PORt CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback;etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name To H/kl Ra z LC y Address�U 1 L L lEf p R City,State,Zip Code L16W PDX -( Z(o 153 Email Phone 225 i Ike 6arden "Co ut ill u ing the effortof improving iYlariner5 Agile,by vorki,ig closely with the City Of nelepm7 and its resident " Mayor Diane Dixon G��VED By ddixon@newportbeachca.govoMM�NM Nt Chair Peter Koetting Cj ®9 gp\9 pkoetting@newportbeachea.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission Ott PlanningCommissioners@newporibeachca.gov ft O Of, CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. 1 am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name Address City,S t/es Zip Code JC )�� _,lA. Email Phone �gC Ike Garden ''n:11 irmir»;IJ)i•efYnri'Of hnprssvi±)g',�ltirinerc}pile,::y svor!:inCt closely svitll i6st ciiy nr.`:%in•i.nn:u ui its uT,ia%irt;" Q�Gg\VEDtB�y September 23,2019 OOMMUN t OEVEItlPMEN Mayor Diane Dixon ®g 2019 Chair Koetting&Commissioners Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov 01'f�'®� CC:Makana Nova, Associate Planner, City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height,setback,etc). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. ' WAq� VINkfeJ 'PUkS CAnJ black Cktoni01 11S Sincerely,. J-- � � Name Address n / n City,State,Zip Code Email Phone 2gj tke bar en ��t:EIVED BV nilt in tI lip,till,effort of itt qn ivin};lvLvinias Pit10.by woI king cInsely tvi I thQ i'!,.4:V,,a;.W I AIIIl I.r.,.n(,;,.rq:,', COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT September 23,2019 OCT ® 9 2019 Mayor Diane Dixon CITY OF Chair Koetting&Commissioners Newport Beach Planning Commission ART BEpG"�° PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautifid city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height, setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautifal,and this structure has been carefiilly designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name AddressCity,State,State,Zip Code ��/ ���/ � /✓C� Email Phone 2g8 the Oar en "1i;niinuil:}.;thr clinrint'iminv�in,�.l.uin��s��lilc,i�5• ngn'khw duSely with ihv r,i4Y u: Vr:,ywu�.d+d lr ��_•f;ta� � �91p19 Mayor Diane Dixon ddixon@newportbeachca.gov ptS�8P Chair Peter Koetting ®Qr@ pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova, Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed-re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name W r l IMAM �• [� !72 Address �DS'T �12Cff eS7 - p?�j(j �/J� City,State,Zip Code (..W�plr et�F/ (v_ O Email Phone 2g�° i the Garden OU(I 011jp`;IL;.pi i;119 uP it lllbUV II_{��.JllIAT9 P:II�. I1y lvUf:i 111 J<ID$Q:�J W illl I!Q f il?u+ `'t'.�I�+u Y.pAI il+❑.".It i+ll Y'�' Mayor Diane Dixon DECEIVED gY ddixon@newportbeachca.gov COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Chair Peter Koetting OCT ® 9 2019 pkoetting@newportbeachea.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission OITYOF PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov P° �ORT ggP CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback, etc.). Additionally, 1 am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, // Name L--, >,4 ✓V I/C e- d /G e'�t/n Address 0 t a e'(-�/t] + .5 1r City,State,Zip Code ' �/e.w���/" C/aG g 2roZ Email Phone 29 D tke GarJen "0"ItinIli 111;160 effulIn( 11111:lo"i"g ikb,ine.s Mi Iv.I,V worl;illgcIo<ely•.viIII tho iti, II i1•.n••id:•nR" IF�CgtV UNRY COMM .1 Mayor Diane Dixon DEVE INPMENt I ddixon@newportbeachca.gov Ocj 09 �019 Chair Peter Koetting 01N®P pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov �a Newport Beach Planning Commission ""Gas®F,P PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height;setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. 1 think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, / Name I%(trv�iDtkZ�t��tt Address O(W �)O U c6 City,State,Zip Code I'CZwpel 2,r,�e� `1'2�Cr a Email Phone 291 the 6arJen :,':udim,ui¢.I he effwt of improving Nlarineix Nlik,b5 working:closely with I iu.rLy of N':wpaii-an d il:. IV;it," COMMUNITY September 23,2019 DEVELdpMENT Mayor Diane Dixon OCT 0 9 2019 Chair Koetting&Commissioners Newport Beach Planning Commission OITYOF PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov o ��BT ®�P CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner, City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height, setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautifiil,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name Address Gi21=r-i-T�tl City,State,Zip Code M-I� 412T Etc—A" r—A. °1 Zlolp'� Email Phone 2J°2 the 6ar en "Continuing the effoof of improving Mariners Mi IC,by working closely with the city of Newport and it;m9tdonls" GSkVED By September 23,2019 CDMMUN bPM o S >, DgV6L . Mayor Diane Dixon Chair Koetting&Commissioners Newport Beach Planning Commission ®g PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov �` �QC-+ �YFrDRt CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. 1 am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height,setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfidly,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed redevelopment of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name `'1( ym(,Vl a f 01�u17)U� Address—'215 Ram 161 C City, State,Zip Code �1� �l� N g o�) G) Email Phone 293 the Garden "Cunlinuing the erFAll uP ingn'iivin};:\.lariu±rs i\lilt,by workiay cln?�b;�ailh the ril y nl'•*:�:.pprl anJ i4:ic.iidanh ' ��CEIVED BY COMMUNITY Mayor Diane Dixon DEVELOPMENT ddixon@newportbeachca.gov OCT ® 9 W9 Chair Peter Koetting pkoettirig@newportbeachca.gov DITYOF Newport Beach Planning Commission ®RT PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name Address_ City,State,Zip Code yV/7 G tip 2 6V Email Phone 29� the 6ar en tsIVED �� BY 'Y:outinuing l Ile affnrt a improving Mariners NIilp.b)•n•orl:in.-doscly with thr lily of iVcr:purl and its icSiACn1+' COMMUNITY �' DEVEI;OPMENB Mayor Diane Dixon OCT ® 9 Z019 ddixon@newportbeachca.gov CITY of Chair Peter Koetting �je pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov ��'� 50 Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbearhca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject; 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, � Name 1 Y I n I ry) i (S`uS S O fJ Address 114 1/2- 1 (Dmc� 4\J I2 City,State,Zip Code 1 l7 L S w N� r C f4 Email Phone �9� the 6arc�en "Cuutinuin"the effnrl of inynoving iblerinm's Mile,by cvnricim Otlielv,viih the cii-' f Rewpurl.mtl iif- re�,i•acnld" Mayor Diane Dixon �OEtVED ®� ddixon@newportbeachca.gov pOMMUR& Chair Peter Koetting pEV@L6PMEN3 .1 pkoetting@newportbeachea.gov 0�T O 9 Z0�9 Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov •CITY OF CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach ORT MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, l am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name '1n� r1 Vl f S U S vu e, ' <Address -7 7 3� U� I S + tM r0� City,State,Zip Code / -A C_4 (2�,�2Vg Email Phone i the 6ar en ,, llED Ili I I ki ing the effort of impravirig 7.1;;einer5 1`0i1 ,by wurlcing ilnsray;vith the dim of n:ewp;n^.;u;d i id„.,r,�OOMMUN�,. ..] pEVELOPMEN September 23,2019 ACT p 9 2019 ;f Mayor Diane Dixon CITY BF Chair Koetting&Commissioners Newport Beach Planning Commission ova PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height,setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, (/ Name Twe1 1\QNIIAHS�� Address L55 3 City,State,Zip Code Nt�Ip<<� �CaC�+ Cp ��460 Email Phone �9� the Garden VED ��E, By 'Y.nntiruiut.{the effort of ingrmv in F,Mrininep4illiI(!, Iyl"iAlIRP dosel%'with the c i t y of Ni-tr-,q!'ta:v; i!•..•rauLr: ,`.DM�t)NtN DEVELOPMENj September 23,2019 Mayor Diane Dixon ray of Chair Koetting&Commissioners Newport Beach Planning Commission PlwmingCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting Us project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height,setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, I I r Name Address L�=,{ 1, City, State,Zip Code Y V�t 0"OmL-j 1j r� k Gas Email Phone t 2J°8 the 6ar en "Cmdiroi Iig the effort of improving Marinas Mile,by working dosely wit lit IW city of Nlewporl:mrl its r eeid,nl e" �of.WED 4 September 23,2019 CpMM1u4I1Y pEVELdPMENT Mayor Diane Dixon OCT 0 9 2�19 Chair Koetting&Commissioners Newport Beach Planning Commission CITY or PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height,setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. 1 think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name �r ✓Lac (A Address J�i ( 1iA / City, State,Zip Code t )dA'�i 6 o Email Phone i Ike Garden GENEDBY ot in a ing kliv Clt)It of iInI'II nitro}.\harin,!.b Mile,by o 0,1 .[I It gI,OwIv%V ilh IPn`�.ity ,I N n,purl ana ih DIE v M PM t 09 2®19 Mayor Diane Dixon ddixon@newportbeachca.gov OIV 01 Chair Peter Koetting AWPORT pkoetting@newportbeachea.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name MQ& 0l Address 30(a7 RIVO1 City,State,Zip Code WLoOxf &r6 , PiA 9amtpp Email Phone 300 the Garden "!.'on�_i!!nis!g the effUrt of imp!ovi!:y,sYlarir:ers Fylile,lip t+nsriciu;;tluseay with tl;e cite ai PJc•vryrort z.!io s;+s rr,iilrnls" �('Y �p17 o�\ September 23,2019 c`t t®r Mayor Diane DixonIIP9@tg Chair Koetting&Commissioners Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height,setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefiilly designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name J Address —1 �,�� 17 LJ7—y—OP ( /J City, State,Zip Code Email Phone 301 the 6arJen 'CO ng the effnrf of improving Mariners�1i Ie,by working closely with the city of Newport aid its resident: GE�VED BY t;DMMUN DEVELOPMENT September 23,2019 �CZ 0 9 2Q19 Mayor Diane Dixon Chair Koetting&Commissioners Ott,(OF Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningConunissioners@newportbeachca.gov tiE6YRORn CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height,setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, �a Name O/Awid_ ) Address f��� _ �niucob — City, State,Zip Code P Email Phone 302 the 6arJen "Co LL'ill o ill g the effort of improving�1luriners Nlile,by working closely with the city of Neivpnfl and it$resiilenls" GoNED By Mayor Diane Dixon eOmmuto NT ddixon@newportbeachca.gov �tSVE�bFME Chair Peter Koetting OCT �9 2019 pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov or Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Qp Name Address DLlk � )�_ City,State,Z'p Code t� t.;7C AV' � Email Phone SOS the 6ar en :uai•':utn��th.)c(il+fl rJr in!t+i5.v inh�i{,i�iit+?rc\IiIC,I+}'!Vmin nl•i InSeb�•tvi1611 n ril1�:'d�;�'.i�.n:m!d it:.�:::iL•nbi` 'VCt;IVED BY COMMUNITY Mayor Diane Dixon DEVELOPMENT ddixon@newportbeachca.gov OCT ® 9 ZA Chair Peter Koetting CITY®F pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov Newport Beach Planning CommissiontORT ®�P PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and die structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, r {� Name Address City,State,Zip Code Email Phone 30�f Ike 6ar en "Cnutinuing the effort of improving Mariners Mile,by working closely Willi @e city of Newport and its resider .�wVED 9Y �pMMUN�ANT Mayor Diane Dixon Cj ®9 ZQ19 ddixon@newportbeachca.gov Chair Peter Koetting 6 � pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. i think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, \ Name Address \(n(/'J Van{C G City,State,Zip Code 14 a IV.) S Email Phone 305 tke bar en "I i g11"IIIItl IIL 111C Cffl lff f1E Il11111'gtr lll) �:dl'11121':: �'l11Y. Itt•N'1!1'I(Illf,tlWolfneilU Illr tilt of�lt•Ivllpl't�.!Ixl il't.reSiJrn`1C" /_ so By ! G44 \V 000 6 okv Mayor Diane Dixon �E�E4�4 ddixon@newportbeachca.gov �Cj ®9 2019 Chair Peter Koetting ®F pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov Gt P Newport Beach Planning Commission 1bNR® PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. 1 think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name Address 1-3 I/.y City,State,Zip Code���/�/f D/Z� 3 4:: ell Email Phone 100 the Garden It in It iIIg the dfort of im provin,e;\tat incrs Mile.,1,},wo-kiat,closely with the fits ul iM,,vpurl.,wf It,m>idcni!:•, ED By tmwoll" Mayor Diane Dixon pEVE��PMENT ddixon@newportbeachca.gov Ocl ® g Zp19 Chair Peter Koetting pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov CIV of Newport Beach Planning Commission *WPogr PlanningConimissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name Address .S // �T f �!, 4 (��/ ✓� City,State,Zip Code l`(e-tla— G 0 L� 7 Email Phone 30 j Ike 6ar en ,Y}.mtinuing file effort nC improving iMal inert:iNi ile,by working closMy with thu city u'r%eh ivpnrt m,f if, ED By OEN uNtt`f Mayor Diane Dixon DE EPMENT ddixon@newportbeachea.gov QCj Q 9 2p19 Chair Peter Koetting Otr{of pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov P Newport Beach Planning Commission WPORT 9� PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely`, Ir /J Name V ( IM � �Q{T N t l t"f�G Address P o g g 3 C/ 6 ton pp City,State,Zip Code @M-o lu 4 F L/1*4 It t/� ill Email Phone 308 the 6arJen "Continuing the effort of improving Mariners Mik,by working closely with the city of Newport and its residents" September 23,2019 4�DENEDm! Mayor Diane Dixon COMMON ENt DE�Et-OPM Chair Koetting&Commissioners 9 20�9 Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach ®�P� MNova@newportbeachca.gov t��t Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height, setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning ission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, I Name �J // / Address �b� '� K V 1 City,State,Zip Code I " Email Phone _ the 6arJen "Confirming the el'forl of improving;Mat ineis\Mile,1 y working dosell wirh lhv city O1 fden I'mI n),I it:,�eoiJq;il;" Mayor Diane Dixon ddixon@newportbeachca.gov Y � hAirliltyt+ Chair Peter KoettingF +etljO���T pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov y ZQ�g Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov C1t t OF CC:Makana Nova Associate Planner City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name i Address City,State,Zip Code (� r` \ 2(0 Email Phone 310 tke bar en "Cnntiuuino IIle efFm4 of inlpI oviny;NlaI iners iMile,by W01'I:II19 CI050Y with the city of N nvrmI and it@ n:gi,I,10", GEIVED @r Mayor Diane Dixon COMM�NRY ddixon@newportbeachca.gov ENT DEVELOPM Chair Peter Koetting OCT p 9 2019 pkoetting@newportbeachea.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission oil"of Z, PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov P®Rt®LPG CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name FAV111 Pit l�ar l Address of I KI plo �tltn CA City,State,Zip Code NOW , CA ' to2 Email Phone 311 the GarJen "Co ntinuiug the efAxl of improving Nlarineis Mile,by o'urldog,closely with the city of iNewpoI and itF wsidenIs" 0 B� 0OMMko�S �v Mayor Diane Dixon Ot�, ddixon@newportbeachca.gov OCR ®� 2p19 Chair Peter Koetting V®p pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach N4Nova@newpoitbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a'project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name Addres. %Q04 City,State,Zip Code .P.(n) (2;) r { 1?eC(/ I C14 5) G,(6 Email I� Phone �12 Ike 6ar en -t'mdinninp;fho e(furF or im).... };imarinri•.\lil¢,I,yI",.kiuydowly wilh(lie[i(v M P,euTor!and ilp u:nid•'rrt<,. �GEIVED BY cotllmutay Mayor Diane Dixon DEVE40PM.eNT ddixon@newportbeachca.gov ACT p 9 2019 Chair Peter Koetting pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov 01TY of Newport Beach Planning Commission P[anningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. 1 am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, {� Name �C Address o/ / / ~,, K ii%l•a'p )/TL t City,State,Zip Code Email Phone 313 the 6arJen "C'nu kinuuig Ill.!effml of improving i\7ari hers Mile,L y working closely with the city,-(Newport.nnl ir<residel Mayor Diane Dixon ENED By ddixon@newportbeachea.gov COMMUNITY Chair Peter Koetting DEVELOPMENT pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov OCT ® 9 2019 Newport Beach Planning Commission CITY OF PlanningConunissioners@newportbeachea.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach ��ORT %or, MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, ` Name 1 l )1 �O�.f' Address 1 -I `� C�•�� 0 —Olt City,State,Zip Code �� of V D Email Phone 31�f Ike Garden "ConI inning IIIc effort of improving Ma iners Mile,by working closely with the city of Newport and ifs icsidi�nt. Mayor Diane Dixon ddixon@newportbeachca.gov �pEIVEp gl< Chair Peter Koetting COMr4l1NITY pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov DEVELOPMENT Newport Beach Planning Commission OCT 0 9 2019 .; PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov f PITY 9F CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach 4'h%B•t 609% MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful'city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, l� Name t3 U z2a Address U1 b 5 City,State,Zip Code Email Phone 315 Ike Garden "Continuing the effin I of improv in,Marinei;s Mile,by working closely wilh the city of Newport;md ilc residents" of WED Br COMMUNITY Mayor Diane Dixon DEVELOPMENT ddixon@newportbeachca.gov OCT 0 9 Z019 I Chair Peter Koetting CITY®F pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov G Newport Beach Planning Commission 424V ORT 0EP PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside, Sincerely, NameY 1 (J Address �iW Q HWI A ` City,State,Zip Code L 4j 62,1/0, ( a 5' Email Phone 31C tke Garden 'Cnulinuin�Ilse effort PI imprfrviuv,i1'lorinrrs ill ilr,hp wnrl;int�Clusdv rvilh Phr ci;� ui Vrielwrt s'inl rta e-u i4 ut.c" P�CEIVEp 9 COMMUNITY' Mayor Diane Dixon OEVEIOPMENr y ddixon@newportbeachca.gov OCT 92019 Chair Peter Koetting poetting@newportbeachea.gov CITY OF Newport Beach Planning Commission %%RT g6P PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name �/ Address l �.�(JI 1 `�Q�3 City,State,Zip Code Email Phone 31� the 6ar en "Con tine iog t he effort of improving Mariners tVtile,by working closely with the rity of Nicwpo l and ifs mc•nls" aECEIVED ay Mayor Diane Dixon COMMUNrry ddixon@newportbeachca.gov DEVELOPMENT Chair Peter Koetting OCT 0 9 2019 pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov CITYop Newport Beach Planning Commission 4%goRT WallP I anningCommiss ioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Namej� tllyr 1�.� Address Of4orw"t *"x (l-2rtQWlVar CA ")V-Ae City,State,Zip Code COrvna ae�l2✓ 6A lc�S Email Phone sl the Garden "Continuing the effort nl improving Mariners R•li le,by working closely with the 6(y of New porl and its iv:Gidents" Mayor Diane Dixon SSCEIVEO ddixon@newportbeachca.gov By COM4UNITY Chair Peter Koetting OEVELOPMENI' pkoetting@newportbeachea.gov OCT 0 9 2019 Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.govy CITY OF CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach '_ORT BEPGx"' MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, G� Name 1�(/t� 6 ` Address City,State,Zip Code r tl* orue(0 0 Email Phone 31 J° the 6ar en "Con I in. i III;thr effml nt imprt'Vill8 MA!i Ile!I NIiie,bV IV rk itIg do,e.ly wit h Hod rlI Eder,pi..l m,d it.np.i(h-I .. Mayor Diane Dixon �CEIVED B ddixon@newportbeachca.gov A ), COMMUNITY Chair Peter Koetting DEVELOPMENT pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov OCT 0 9 2019 Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov CITY OF CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MORT BEPG MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Keening&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, p Name Jinn W%.A W Address t� Ll�t uj% U City,State,Zi Code Email Phone 320 the Garden -Ooulinuinp,llu:orFn❑of ingn ov ing NLiriners Mile,by I,orking closely with thecity ul \:oichuri:uvl its u•.iJrut,' Mayor Diane Dixon ,SIVED gl, ddixon@newportbeachca.gov COMN91.1NIV DEV EL OMAENT Chair Peter Koetting OCT L019 pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission CITY OF PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov g ORT 50-W CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. 1 think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely,Name iC Q I e.dF1rv,,J-62 Address �_ fpcn City,State,Zip Code- 1e Ll 4 UC1 641 2 7 Email Phone �21 tke 6ar en "0111tin It I g the efAn9 of improving Rial inecs Mile,by working dosely with the city or Nowpua.md its n ;i(IV nIs" 9ECEIVEp 6y Mayor Diane Dixon COMMUNITY ddixon@newportbeachea.gov DEVELOPMENT Chair Peter Koetting OCT ® 9 2019 pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission CITY OF PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov ORT sold" CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach N4Nova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, 1 currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name 1 I Address_29UP0 F'QKkJJe /1)p26- -#R)q City,State,Zip Code NQ� I�� (�( I C c(AUU 1 Email Phone 322 the Garden m11'ifmil.g Ill'e1fwI u: imp:Oviuy;�4arin;ys^wile,he ,m]Ju.�:lowi, wit it I'lim'-i o.1 a;m!d+;rsiJvp;s- Mayor Diane Dixon ddixon@newportbeachea.gov ��GEIVED ey COMMUNITY Chair Peter Koetting DEVELOPMENT pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov OCT 0 9 2019 Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CITY OF Co'I° CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach '*4rQRT 00 MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, , Name J 6 14V =5 Address 2 I all V14- rE c>✓D City,State,Zip Code cQd�i1� lU� t?<fXP/V 6"-4 0 Email Phone 323 i the 6ar en "Con I in a i❑g t he effort of i III ing Mariners MiLq by working clobcly nilh the city of Newpurt and it,I sidcnl<" Mayor Diane Dixon ddixon@newportbeachca.gov ,,,CfIVED By Chair Peter Koetting COMMUNITY pkoetting@newportbeachea.gov DEVELOPMENT Newport Beach Planning Commission OCT ® 9 209 PlanningCommissioners@ne%vportbeachca.gov CITY OF CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach IV Nova@newportbeachca.gov puff 0 Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics ofthe commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name /:�'G✓e-� �i C-'; Address City, State,Zip Code Email Phone 3�� i i like 6arJen "Continuing rile WilII Of in,pmving Mariners Mile,by evil luiIg Closely Willi flit rio,0 Newport and its re;:idenis" DECEIVED By Mayor Diane Dixon COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT ddixon@newportbeachca.gov Chair Peter Koetting OCT 0 9 2019 pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov CITY OF Newport Beach Planning Commission 'fFLy�,ONT Boo,PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.), Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, / Name Address :%<:, L City,State,Zip Code Email �I Phone s25 the 6ar en "C1.111inuill"[lie offollof improving -',T:i Mayor Diane Dixon ddixon@newportbeachca.gov Chair Peter Koetting pkoetting@newponbeachca.gov 16�GSIVED By Newport Beach Planning Commission COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach OCT MiNova@newportbeachca.gov CITY or Gde Subject: 215 Riverside ft'I'PORT Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely' "J Name �o Address—//Ir City, State,Zip Code 6-,;7- Email Phone the 6arc�en "giLLinuigq the effurl of improoin;.Mariners.\file,by'workingdosrlywilythe 61yof i\lowl+,vl and ii.} PSL(II.•nis.. Mayor Diane Dixon ,,0CENED By ddixon@newportbeachca.gov COMMUNITY DFVELOPMENT Chair Peter Koetting OCT 0 9 2019 pkoetting@newportbeachea.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission CITY Or PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov 11�NPORT e�PG CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. 1 think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, :1 Name_ Address City,State,Zip Code ®,(� � Email Phone z j the Garden "[nntirmim Il se a fh'.9 of i nI rirvi.;t;11\UI i nri5 M fle,by k.::n rL III iln6PiY wil II 111•6 of .,!] :e-:,drn1 Mayor Diane Dixon Q�G�\MUN ddixon@newportbeachca.gov CO Eu�pMvO Oev Chair Peter Koetting OCj Q J 2Q19 pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov ®P Newport Beach Planning Commission �\v �� PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov ftl4 olt 14 CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, ,, Name VC b\ 1 l0 t (U\ Address City,State,Zip Code - Email Phone 328 the 6arc en "C:unlinuing the effort of improving R9eri ners Alile,by wort;ing closely with the city oI,"let,po I an it.,I C�idrnIS'" Mayor Diane Dixon _`�g1VED By ddixon@newportbeachca.gov 001nn7uNrry Chair Peter Koetting DEVELOPMENT pkoetting@,newportbeachca.gov OCT p 9 2019 Newport Beach Planning Commission CITY OfPlanningComm issioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova City Newport Beach Associate Planner Ci of Ne ORT 1APpd� MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name (� Address City,State,Zip Code G3 l �OIA S l C3.ND 12 (e Email Phone 321 tke 6araen "C'nntinuim;the effort of impmVing Marine,,Mile,by working lovely,Vith Nu•tit),of Newporl awl it:.mjiucols' Mayor Diane Dixon �,CEIVED By ddixon@newportbeachca.gov COMMUNITY Chair Peter Koetting DEVELOPMENT pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov OCT 09 2019 Newport Beach Planning Commission CITYOF PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov y� CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach `' ORT 50 MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. 1 am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name Address Flo � 2 Z 9 City,State,Zip Code rJt�el bore T-c-2 LG—PO Email Phone 330 the Garden Rt3CEIVEp 6p Mayor Diane Dixon CCMYUNITy ddixon@newportbeachca.gov DE"LOPMENT Chair Peter Koetting OCT ® 9 2019 pkoetting@newportbeachea.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission m]� PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov n B0,06 CC:Makana Nova, Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name i �.yul I S � ��� Address V ypR[ I�U—e City,State,Zip Code LW-/tip Z.,OvZ- Email Phone ��- 31 the Carden "Co n till uing the effin1 of improving Man I'ers Adile,by work inK closely with tlu:City of Newport:md iIs reside II Mayor Diane Dixon �SCeIVEO gy ddixon@newportbeachea•gov COMMUNITY Chair Peter Koetting DEVELOPMENT pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov OCT .0 9 2019 Newport Beach Planning Commission CITY OF PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach FIT MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, 1 am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, --� Name —I uM cRO5S �oi Address y '/z O N VX Ave- City,State,Zip Code L6i0A TSLAND CA 92 �o (oZ Email Phone 332 the 6ar en "t ontiuuhu,Ihu ufI ortuf in, ill,t:Wari nnc+N I ile.by working closeiv with the tilt'of NCrvpiH9 dnJ iI,ic,idruK' Mayor Diane Dixon ��OgNED Qy ddixon@newportbeachca.gov COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Chair Peter Koetting ® 9 2��9 pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov 0c, Newport Beach Planning Commission CITY of PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov Gt CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach 4'�WPORT 0gP MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, t currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name l�N?-tSTOS YL,AI?—MlS Address Z05 vtp. SAi✓ REND City, State,Zip Code N G—wtxcL \31✓ AGE s A 92663 Email Phone 94�- 2vu — �99Z 333 the bar en "f`nni iny,tlffi clinrt or irtipruvi.ly,Ibl:u iI,cm Mile.by wwki ill;closely with!he dI,oI \vlvlmi(an d iiv Iva I-.' Mayor Diane Dixon ddixon@newportbeachca.gov el, COMMUNITY Chair Peter Koetting DEVELOPMENT poetting@newportbeachca.gov OCT 0 9 2019 Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CITY OF CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach PORT eEPO� MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely Name EaL Address 5 I City, State, "Lip Code Email Phone 331{ Ike 6ar en .•(on I'inu i ug Ole effort of imlxnv iog•,X1,ii iueic MiIr,by vo.k4n;r1,,.rlr wiI Ii the ot,or id.•wpnrl and i6.i:wnles,!. Mayor Diane Dixon ddixon@newportbeachca.gov ��C81VED By COMMUNITY Chair Peter Keening DEVEI.0PMENT pkoetting@newportbeachea.gov 0cj Q 9 2019 Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov OITY OF CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach ftWpORT OAP MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name Address p City,State,Zip Code Email Phone 335 Ike 6ar enl "f nulinuin„ILe cl'IOA u(iu'•prlleinF;\Inri m•Iv I\dill,6�•a;nl'I:ilh i lm:rl1'udn:ILi•c'ilp nV'\lvl.�urt.md:1••IrSiilp ill:' DECEIVED 6y Mayor Diane Dixon COMMUNITY ddixon@newportbeachca.gov DEVELOPMENT Chair Peter Koetting OCT 0 9 2019 pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov CITY OF Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov ORT BEPCO� CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon, Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name ti V\),— VIM i�Vl Address '7 >O; \C�i�✓lI 1/r71 City,State,Zip Code (v LJ F1 Email Phone 33C f I the 6arJen "C:uufinuing the effort of iutprovilig Mariners Mile,hy,vurking closely rvith the cite of Ne,cpmt anil its residents' Mayor Diane Dixon ddixon@newportbeachca.gov RECEIVED 9 COMMUNITY Chair Peter Koetting I DEVELOPMENT poetting@newportbeachca.gov OCT 092019 Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CITY OF CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach CRT BEPGA MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon, Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, `` f Name Address /L.k ki J�z Iy� City,State,Zi Code �I Email Phone 33� "lmke 6ar en rtiu Ili ng ILe efrod ofim III vin„iklaI ine,s,F IL,I,y wnrkmg ikmrly wihI,t hen Iv ni N"".I turl.mdII, v !,I .tl< SECEIVED By Mayor Diane Dixon COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ddixon@newportbeachca.gov OCT ® 9 2019 Chair Peter Koetting pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov CITYOF Newport Beach Planning Commission oor 60 PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, 1 am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, ,y� Name /V 064zioj IrZ4 S Address t? City,State,Zip Code_�s✓polcr )zc-WrQ/ Email Phone 338 ke Garden ';nnlinuinp 16e e(furl 4 imprm:ug biarimu,Mile,I.y wnd:int;doscly"il'h lile cil,--.1 I•utl.ual it=uaiAr•uLt Mayor Diane Dixon �s f_IVED By ddixon@newportbeachca.gov COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Chair Peter Koetting ACT ® 9 2019 pkoetting@rewportbeachca.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission Ofpy Of PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov �POf4T� CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name '`nade► in�e S� I Puty � da Address �Z �n 1{1� y e R y'��,"r City,State,Zip Code Emai Phon 33J° the 6ar en •! "Cmninui pig l he effrutof improving ibium'i ne(s lvlile.by voikingclusel with Ibecil b Y 1'of Nv:••por,;uul ilti rc:;i dcnllP I Mayor Diane Dixon ddixon@newportbeachea.gov VECEtVED By COMMUNITY Chair Peter Koetting DEVELOPMENT pkoetting@newportbeachea.gov OCT 0 9 2019 Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@nev,portbeachca.gov CITY OF G'A CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach ORT,e;P MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, p^ ` Name Address 2LO) CA City, State,Zip Code 43-6,0 1 O Email oor!!!!! Phon 340 the 6arJen "CnnHnuiu�Ehe Blforl nt'improvint;Mariners\Mile,by+corlciug dU5e1}'++•il:h El�r tih'nf iVre•puA;o+d iLo rr.. �����' (:flA9A91a„3iFY ®EVEV)PMENT ' Mayor Diane Dixon OCT 0 9 Z019 ddixon@newportbeachca.gov Chair Peter Koetting CITY OF pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov 9RT%VY Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely,Name —r�y , I 1 �r• NQ� I Address 9I` 1 j City,State,Zip Code NeA)J r�r ,ex CA 9a (p(v ) Email �t' Phone JONI!!! 3-�{1 the GarJen "Conti- hic,,the effi?rl of imhmuing iXla,i Ile,S Mile.by wwking d(,,eI),v:ilh 111,titN of"h,v,.... ,fnJ ih r5idiu4:" vSCEIVED By COMMUNITY Mayor Diane Dixon DEVELOPMENT ddixon@newportbeachca'.gov OCT 'O 9 2019 Chair Peter Koetting CITY OF pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission %11ORT BEPCA PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name Address} ✓ A, 2 y�1�J ���✓))I�GJ O y j City,State,Zip Code � Y,.�/-' '!Seo-dL. Email Phone 3�� i the Garden "C'ontimiing the of fart III'inq>rov ing Mal ioers N Iile,by working closely with the Cily of Newilmi and il'.lesideols" PgcEIVED By COMMUNITY Mayor Diane Dixon DEVELOPMENT ddixon@newportbeachca.gov OCT'O 9 2019 Chair Peter Koetting poetting@newportbeachca.gov CITY OF Newport Beach Planning Commission 14PPORT BOO\\ PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, l ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, r L Name C. a- rlee, Address 092 M , faro r City,State,Zip Code N a w f!c J B e «Jx CA G '1 6 G Email Phone 3�3 the 6arJen "Gnrii It"ing the efforl of inIprnv rnp kb nets,Mile,by working dosely with the rity of iNewpod and iL<,;rc:idv" Is" Mayor Diane Dixon ikeCEIVEO B ddixon@newportbeachca.gov COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Chair Peter Koetting OCT 09 2019 pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission CITY OF PlanningCommissioners@newponbeachea.gov IN ""OR7 13E001, CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, ,f7 � l Name Address /t� G gI'� City,State,Zip Code / v C to ,. 0, �. 4- Email Phone 34�f the 6arJen "Cnnlinuing t he effort of improving Mal ri ners Nlile,by'VI Irk ing close Iy+vil h the cit} of iVr:n•p II and residents" Mayor Diane Dixon CE,IVED g ddixon@newportbeachca.gov �E Y COMP UNITY Chair Peter Koetting DEVELOPMENT poetting@newportbeachca.gov OCT 0 9 M9 Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CITY OF G CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Cr(J-69ck Name 66 C&? / Address / 2 f 7( / 1 ( 6Z C-.(} C4 P City,State,Zip Code 7 C ` - 0 Email Phone S 45 the 6ar en "Cnnfinuing the effln1 of improving N1arinecc Mile,by voiking closely lviIII the city or NOV I1n1 and ilj �ECEIVEp By Mayor Diane Dixon COMMUNITY ddixon@newportbeachca.gov DEVELOPMENT Chair Peter Koetting OCT 09 2019 poetting@newportbeachca.gov CITY OF Newport Beach Planning Commission GA PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov 44PPORT t3EP CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name Address City,State,Zip Code 1 J C /� (P 3 Email Phone 3�� "tk6arJen e tiiiu i ng the d7lorl nl i ill proc in},R-rdrineis iN Iile,be ovrkiug dusely with Ilse city nl'NCwI,(vl a d i I s I Usi de, h:" Mayor Diane Dixon ddixon@newportbeachca.gov µECEIVEO Chair Peter Koetting COMMUNITYr pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov DEVELOPMENT Newport Beach Planning Commission Oar 0 9 2019 PlanningConunissioners@newportbeachca.gov CITYOP CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov pORT BEPC� Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, 1 currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name �.'U (JSf-- Address 12 &% City,State,Zip Code _ / - '} Email Phone 347 the Garden EIVED@y na inuiu�tlx elfurl or iml?f0u'i❑})\9d CinCt3 MII':•by:,wkitly 6"wly willl lll"Cily Of IYNN'I%Uri dtl,l it.�r•si;Ii '0'M�ttNITY DEVELOPMENT Mayor Diane Dixon OCT 0 9 Z019 ddixon@newportbeachca.gov 61TY OF Chair Peter Koetting �FWPBRT 9�PGA pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission PlatiningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name ? Address�1 /,i f�jfyWzt c„r c, A10— City,State,Zip Code 0 eu& li cxr L �Z 6,b3 Email Phone the 6ar en .•� ;m13na:nK Uir eE(i�rl of inll!rb,•ml;N!ar!nrn AiiL• by ana6ing�lascl4"•�•il l;N,r i ii;-u£'tiwrvin n'E;:n::its inciA.•ols•• ,ECEIVED 81, COMMUNITY Mayor Diane Dixon DEVELOPMENT ddixon@newportbeachca.gov OCT 0 9 Z019 Chair Peter Koetting poetting@newportbeachea.gov OITY OF Newport Beach Planning Commission %PORT PtanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC: Makana Nova, Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, J Name _ . �j`( jou Address 2(o, 0� Muy,26I r 6MA City,State,Zip Code l I pmyd ?Z�O C Email Phone 3�9 Ike Garden "C II.4i nu it.4lhr cf(wl n( im(,:nt.iltr',!:n:ner5 Milt.,1'q•rvkrdcin:y 6,50Y with fie•61"of VVITIlnrl and i15:r;:J•,,;:r. Mayor Diane Dixon ddixon@newportbeachca.gov �Zog1VED gy comt UMTY Chair Peter Koetting pEVELOMENT poetting@newportbeachea.gov OCT 0 9 2019 Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov Gay of CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach 41�,VROBT J MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, 1 currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, I Name /`,n��' 1p �I ,J/I Address�� / , ,t/"/ City, State,Zip Code Email Phone 3�0 tke 6araen "Coutinuinh Ilse effort of imlaoving Mariners Nlile,by nvrkiuq closely Willi the city of Nen porl nuc':r,rtsidPntY.•. Mayor Diane Dixon ddixon@newportbeachca.gov Chair Peter Koetting µ@CEIV�p e Y pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov pE pE MUNITy 40pmei.4T Newport Beach Planning Commission OCT ®9 2019 PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach Ctn of MNova@newportbeachca.gov pRT 13EAGY, Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon, Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name t J Address 17� U(i S A/ r- rt i City,State,Zip Code Email Phone 351 the 6ar en "Continuity,}1Le cfnrf of iniprnvinl{ibtarinc�s ivl ile,6v wnr!.iug rlo�:cl}•wilh the rii}'��`Krtvpud miJ il..firvi drul-" Mayor Diane Dixon RECEIVED B ddixon@newportbeachca.gov COMMUNI rr DEVELOPMENT Chair Peter Koetting ��T 9 poetting@newportbeachca.gov 2019 Newport Beach Planning Commission CITY OF PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov %PORr BEPCX, CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, l currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, 1 ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name ��(_/V Address _�nn City, State,Zip Code q W5— Email Phone �52 the 6arJen "Conlin a inl;I'heel'1urtur i ulp env iug NblI incu Mile,byworking clusely with I hecityof Newpo,I and ioz ,siilenl>" DECEIVED 9 COM14UNITYy Mayor Diane Dixon DEVELOpMENT ddixon@newportbeachea.gov OCT 092019 2019 Chair Peter Koetting pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov CITY of: Newport Beach Planning Commission ` P,"?, BEPe1"' PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Carden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. 1 think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name f''.fL C.C/1,Jy( Address T f' :i l' y7� City, State,Zip Code AL, Email Phone 3�3 Ike 6ar en I'nuiinu iny,the effint ur inl prm in!,:\{arinerts%%I ile,L•p work ill);CI)=vly rvi I Ili,tilt n(D.4 tvnnrt and il>i esidenW' ,ACEIVED BY COMMUNITY Mayor Diane Dixon DEVELOPMENT ddixon@newportbeachca.gov OCT 0 9 204 Chair Peter Koetting poetting@newportbeachca.gov CITY OF G Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach, close to the proposed re-development of215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city.'s adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height, setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that.currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name (^0GW -0GU6J''� Address � 00. f c City,State,Zip Code r'F C Email Phone 35�f 16 6arJen "C'ontinoinf.Ilie effort of imps OViog Mariners Mile,by working;closely with the city of Newport and its residents" EIVED By Iy coMr��N Mayor Diane Dixon DEVEt�pMENT ddixon@newportbeachca.gov Chair Peter Koetting poetting@newportbeachca.gov filly OF Newport Beach Planning Commission14 ppRt�F'P PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newpoitbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name Address loco �C �J i._ 1" —& 7, City,State,Zip Code 1 y. 1,\'�(�<' �z�t=% E �' C 4 Email Phone 355 Ike Garden •,r.al:Tiludln'III,:C(In11 Ul iullnLvi qq Mxi;wrc Milt,k•p .nal+iali c4lscl"wl l' lin•rrfy n{p.:rrry i}n�!,!r,l :..,,:,.i; September 23,2019 PrGCEIVED ey COMMUNITY Mayor Diane Dixon DEVELOPMENT_ Chair Koetting&Commissioners OCT 0 9 2019 Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CITY OF CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner, City of Newport Beach � MNova@newportbeachca.gov % , VOW- Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height,setback, etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautifu,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name 1A 00 P 42 c. ll-rat J Address /& fb 5�1 City,State,Zip Code GA Email Phone 3�C the Garden „o:nif:niup;the!(l finp,;vin;.N'L,incr:,i0;1c, 1.1 o:u,kill"i osely wiN;IIw cih:of V,:"o. VIVEDt BY September 23,2019 coMM ENT DEVELOPM: Mayor Diane Dixon OCT p 9 2U19 Chair Koetting&Commissioners Newport Beach Planning Commission � 1F PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov Gbl° CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbmchca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height,setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefidly designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name -enii\ aY $ 17 Address a S y A��. y t� t City, State,Zip Code lVe w,o��r? Email Phone 35`Lj the Garden an^6;aiu::fln:rl7urf uh ir�q!!nviul;YLvinc::•Agile.h:uorkiu�;cicscly:�i;h a;c ri;v�;i\vw;a;; ail lr,r.-:iA,•;C:^ ,t September 23,2019 Q�OBy vuwv COW4 os\)F40PMENT Mayor Diane Dixon Chair Koetting&Commissioners Q�Z Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CIN OF G CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner, City of Newport Beach 4�waORl BAP MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach, close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height, setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, '' II &az, Name &/ ar Address 'VOO 6AEKL J A J6 City,State,Zip Code of y aef �M Cif► l� 3 Email Phone s54 Ike bar en I71;i1I11iu1 Ow;diurt of imprt:v 6:{;;YY dI'i q„r. ',filr Iw,+'nrf<:;q;r lo'iely will,Ih, :it% ail m:i ifti'q•u J.:. . September 23,2019 �CEIVEp ey COMMUNITY Mayor Diane Dixon DEVEt.OPMENT Chair Kcetting&Commissioners OCT 0 9 2019 Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CITY OF CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach '%ftRT ®EAG1' MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height,setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name l Address Uod PF}R 2 11&4- City, State,Zip Code 1,00 179 /7/,/ Email Phone Ike 6ar `en 'f'nnliuuiu,;Ih.,cfro,t of imvniving Marmon P9ii8•br wurking,clpeeiS wilh the ri`,, ::".r%1 Vl%:,u1J ii.. ra1411'•1.",:' September 23,2019 Mayor Diane Dixon ��p8\V Chair Koetting&Commissioners COMMUNIV Newport Beach Planning Commission OVELOPMENT PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov ® 9 2019 CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach ®F MNova@newportbeachca.gov OITM yo G Subject: 215 Riverside WORT®�P Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height, setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, /n/ Name 1 �/I��`��t{ Address S f O�I Ph Iz� (I' U 1. City, State,Zip Cade Ott ( G f Email Phone 3�0 the Garden '9'ortinuing thy•efforl of in,pnreirig iNimincrs `:1ilr..be working 6's'lIV with Ihr city of:NIcu,Ntr e.,n(I iv;rnyi,.fi•w,' #IV I uwiT September 23,2019 ComM DgVELOPMOT Mayor Diane Dixon ACT ®9 2019 Chair Koetting&Commissioners Newport Beach Planning Commission CIT t or PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov �Vl't2R�@F'P CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height, setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commissio o p ve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, �n i Name rillI��OV1d5 It Address ' L&00 I ZU)O,V T n City,State,Zi Code Email Phone 3C1 Ike Garden "(nolinoing Ilse eflin'I of imprnviry;:Mal illo,Ude.by ,nikin},dnsely t,ilh it..,i ity nl \rn=p,n'I and it•,maidrnld• CeWED a), C.OMMUwxy Mayor Diane Dixon pEVEI thPMENT ddixon@newpoitbeachca.gov OCi ® 9 20>9 Chair Peter Koetting pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov OITY Or POD Newport Beach Planning Commission 4L,-,Wp oft T ®� PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name Address Lufl!, ` II City,State,Zip Code QCW 0% L �?L C i C': '� C.. l`� �• ?lc L' Email Phone 3C2 the 6ar en "Continuing IhC+lYovl.of imp,o in};Mal iner.Milo,I`Y wl,rhiiq; ,ilh the ii!y rl `±¢wlu,r...nil iP•n=nlrrns" �GEIVED By Mayor Diane Dixon ut451 ddixon@newportbeache.a.gov e, ENT DEVEI- Chair Peter Koetting 9 2019 pkoetting@newportbeaclica.gov OF Newport Beach Planning Commission OtT t G� PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov 4%PORT BAP CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and confonns to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. 1 think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name Address ( City,State,Zip Code V� U Email Phone 3�3 the 6arc�en . .;1 .m::ytill.0lwl-11 iu�pnn:f'tt;Ale:iu:•z•:'�Iau,h) mnil,mt••.In.e11•Nilh'14•i W' nl '1ry pnn pi.-:ii•.u•.;:I:;rl= �ECEIVEp 9y COMMUNITY Mayor Diane Dixon DEVELOPMENT ddixon@newportbeachca.gov OCT 0 9 2019 Chair Peter Koetting pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov CITY®F Newport Beach Planning Commission N� 9RT B�PpA PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,)am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a butler between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, {� Name {�J ` P G �� la Q sl( v Address R'f2.r:1 C /v City,State,Zip Code %.wRueZ; l�l�e ,rt Ch Email Phone 3�� he Garde n oolinuiu.41L,elf...l of imploe ing M..,u:c: Mile,L'ywo'kiuS Clo-:ek.wilh(I",file of\_I,.pvo,md mn�aIrnl•` GgNED By COMA utoi-y DEVELOPMENT Mayor Diane Dixon Q J Z�19 ddixon@newportbeachca.gov QQ� Chair Peter Koetting r ,IVOF pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov GZ` • �M1'PORT 8�P Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, 1 ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name �/1 t��i�Ci Address " t—r)Z City,State,Zip Code NG(A)0 0 Email Phone 3G5 the Gar en "(\mlinninG the el tool nt impmving Marinets Mile,by wurk hlg tlnscly with Illy 0t),nl Novi-url and it,t�-Adol ld 1j,'00VED BY Mayor Diane Dixon COMMUNITY ddixon@newportbeachea.gov DEVELOPMENT Chair Peter Koetting OCT 0 9 2019 pkoetting@newportbeachea.gov CITY OF Newport Beach Planning Commission N G1 PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov �tWPORT ggP CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and state of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. 1 think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name �,l°IT_IiIIIA- Address i ' i 1' „ e l-L)y City,State,Zip Code Email Phone 3�C the Garden "("untinuing the vffml ofinywi ing i\laiinri.s\file,by Inselt,,,'illl li,e.Cib:of Vr,vporl.md iv,,, i:L:ul ��GgNED QY COMMUNITY Mayor Diane Dixon DEVELOPMENT ddixon@newportbeachca.gov OCT 0 9 2019 Chair Peter Koetting pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov CITY OF G'r Newport Beach Planning Commission N4WORT 0gP PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density, The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. 1 think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name : J�I/Iell f I <� X�'✓�rlil�. /��.. Address %,G'l 'k�/� 1 City,State,Zip Code Email Phone 3�� Ike GarJen .,(un;inuuL,IBe efG.nl of ingn'ntilt7;\lariNlc:Ithlr hq nnrltin!;Cln+r lv trilh L'n Celt'nl \ir+•:I n :,ael::•:o..:n,4n:• Mayor Diane Dixon ddixon@newponbeachca.gov �SCEIVED @y Chair Peter Koetting COMMUNITY OEVELOPMENT pkoetting@newportbeachea.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission OCT 9 2019 PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov CITY of I CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach 4Y�WP®RT MNova atewportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, 1 currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name AtIOU 1 PO*PO4 Address `Soo Ai✓oll City,State,Zip Code NPw2o, f tear)), OA 9a&roO Email Phone S02 Ike , Gar, en ..`'uul inui lig the Ylortnr inIIIov;ngN1.1,ino, MiL..L,y wnrkingI logVIVwith Ih.6ty0 va,,rl ar.;I W.r,..,Jr„i•... RECEIVED BY COMhNNITY September 23,2019 OE\/ELOpMENT Mayor Diane Dixon OCT Q 9 2�19 Chair Koetting&Commissioners Newport Beach Planning Commission CITY or PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov r", 0�P CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach NFWPORT MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Kcetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height,setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name C, Address City,State,Zip Code /V Y �� •.,- F; G X.<^ CA Gr t Z 6 - U Email Phone 3�9 Ike 6ar en ..I'nnlinuing Ito effort of improving:bt:rtiuera N I ilc,by workingdoscly wi sh the ci:y of Ni-tvIit I,ual its wt,i JV.IIS" September 23,2019 �yECEIVEp 9y Mayor Diane Dixon COMMUNITY Chair Koetting& Commissioners DEVELOPMENT Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@,newportbeachea.gov OCT 0 9 Zplg CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach CITY OF NNova@newportbeachca.gov newportbeachca.gov ,t, `VPO.-T 5eNr' Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of New Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height,setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefWly designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectftdly,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name �/ 1�L Address &C12 LY(4� City,State,Zip Code �� , "l p Email Phone 3�0 the Garden oGE,VEDBy 'Cnutim,hig the effnrl pl iml+ineiin�Marinrin klilc,h5r+'urkigGJn.rlY with ihr rih of\erau)n dud its laSfJenl CO�MV ,�S•( OE�E��P OC,�•®g 2019 Mayor Diane Dixon ddixon@newportbeachca.gov �t Of Chair Peter Koetting %,NPORS 0�P pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely Name Address City,State,Zip Code ! ( t 9 Email Phone 3�1 I Ike 6arJen I "C'nrlimm%Owoflodulimpnning\LninerS Mile,by wurkin,G cln>el}-++'ilk l6!cllr trf Nr,%li,i;t,,ud iq rc:iJrnl�" l Mayor Diane Dixon ddixon@newportbeachca.gov Chair Peter Koetting pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, 1 currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name Address City,State Zi /. ! Email Phone .3j 2 Ike Garden ti roll innintl l lieofnrl of imprm inn\Imin.• , M00.Iwn•w.l:mp, ilh ihr rilc of....... !qmi iI..,.•: .li nl Mayor Diane Dixon ddixon@newportbeachca.gov ��GEIVED gy Chair Peter Koetting COMMUNITY pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov DEVELOPMENT Newport Beach Planning Commission OCT 0 9 2019 PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CITY OF G� CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach �WPORT OrGP MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, l currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name1 {^-7U7vc Address l��y �ry 0 L hl V-t) In City,State,Zip Code 0 J Email Phone 373 Ike 6ar en nnlinui nt,I I w 0.1-1'nrl„I imp...vinp.blarincrs\file,br working rInsch with the'it).of i1h."p d and ,I, DECEIVED QI, COMMUNITY Mayor Diane Dixon DEVELOPMENT ddixon@newportbeachca.gov OCT-09 2019 Chair Peter Koetting pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov GIN OF Newport Beach Planning Commission 'I',,VPDRT pgPG� PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this stricture has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, �A Name o n� Address � v t f �,"r 1 /� City,Slwiiilt � (J �V Email Phone i Ike Garden or.linuin�tLc effort nriml.fu•. iri;'„L:Yivart.\lil,:.he:...:Lap. u•.r:, ,.:i!L 4:,, i'•:r•np:l.L.:•:3.:.;..ia:nf<• GE•IVED aI, COMMUNITY Mayor Diane Dixon , DEVELOPMENT ddixon@newportbeachca.gov OCT 0 9 2019 Chair Peter Koetting pkoetting@newportbeachea.gov CITY OF GA Newport Beach Planning Commission ��ORT grGP PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 2l5 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name l�i�l l.! n e 1C Yfyo bl 11 cv, l d i j T—r Address__�lp go I oG( e City, S Email Phone lhiw 3j 5 the Garden ,l'nnlin..6II'tIhrplinAnli...I•r..i",Nh.in.!";,%Iilp,I" "(whi"gI,,-A% "iIIlI'v:if, .I •w"p,:d:aiI .i+ E\VEDQ}, 0E, uwTY cone! DEVELOPMENT Mayor Diane Dixon p 9 2p�g ddixon@newportbeachca.gov Chair Peter Koetting otTf of pkoetting@nexvportbeachea.gov 414WORC ®Fi Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name ley. , irle�nM Address ZG 1—�A"Aazu. O b f o SCt,1,4194) City, State,Zi Code _:i.,wE CA ntW c f+ baa(11 Email Phone 3j C .ke 6ar3en .,(....aim,hw Ih:'¢Ilurt4 imprm i.l.g\1...ine, i\lilt,by vvm Li.w.dt.!.0r,.ilh ih.rih +•I �i��i'Iv,ii"..,I y.,,ra.Icn1 DECEIVED BY Mayor Diane Dixon COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT ddixon@newportbeachca.gov Chair Peter Koetting OCT 0 9 W9 poetting@newportheachca.gov CITY(OF Newport Beach Planning Commission yPOR7 eEP6A PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. 1t is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiftl,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name bet �\ iF. —a. Address 37 cj )C City,S viii Email Phone 3J�J� Ike Garden "f r.olim,ny',the ailurl nl ill'J'A;,.g N L.6.1o, %I i6•,by work ill--'closely will.11w it, el \rr. nnl e!nl I:,i,•�., P." DB I I b II�GGgg�VE Y 0-04o t peJE�1. Mayor Diane Dixon O . 0S TO ddixon@newportbeachca.gov �S Chair Peter Keating pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov r�P� aIEVVpoFi't 0 Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca,gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. 1 am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, n O Y Name r�rltC�Mik �M�¢ Address 1 q"1 D �6� �U vylt yv— City,State Zi Code Email Phone 3�8 the Garden 'l nnrilnuu;•Ilm rf('nrl nl'improe inp• 41.uim:r>:1'filc.by.u=tn'I,utv,rlp.rlt u.nli lhr rily al'�:v::I,n.l.::.l •I.i.:.td.•:a, ��0Etveo ay comma ITV DEVELOPMENT Mayor Diane Dixon ICY p 9 2019 ddixon@newportbeachca.gov Chair Peter Koetting CITX Of pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov V RTore Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachr,a.gov CC:Makana Nova, Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, 1 ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely,Name &I"fr-1 ythdq�� Address III R n� S4Te4 �Q", City,State,Zip Code Ntu D 9 c1ltity J Email Phone 3�J I the Garden '( nnlinuing illo olorl M..rimm',\lil, lit :.•urlting clm:aly t60,llw city ni\rtel•arl.m.i 9g.CEtVED By COMMUNITY Mayor Diane Dixon DEVELOPMENT ddixon@newportbeachca.gov OCT 0 9 2019 Chair Peter Koetting poetting@newportbeachca.gov CITY OF Newport Beach Planning Commission ORT BEP PlanningConunissioners@newportbeachea.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, 1 ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Namee/A N2r L� t� Address 3 City,State,Zi Code Email Phonew,�e wr &C A 3g0 16 6arJen I 'r nuliiu:i:q;tl;r,::(I nrl of ingnb•in4;l6.0 ine:.\dill,h� vrlaiu,K+'Iuceh ;vilA lli; ra. ni'ti.r:poa::.;d �^,r..,.it..n::"�\VED By UN1tY Como PMEN T pEVE4o Mayor Diane Dixon ddixon@newportbeachca:gov Chair Peter Koetting cttY of poetting@newportbeachca.gov o't' N�INPDRT 0�P Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova, Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, 1 currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, y r 1L Name Address City,State,Zip Code Gw U i/ Email Phone "�- g1 I I i I. tke 6arJen � "lmtlinuing lhv ad5wl ul inlln'uviu�,\lariner:•\Tilt,Ly wurl<im•,r.loscl\'+•'ilh the dill of�Lrvlunl.....I i�.n•.uirur" Mayor Diane Dixon NOD By ddixon@newportbeachca.gov �MoAx E j OOJF:-O? Chair Peter Koetting pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov �C Newport Beach Planning Commission Dtt't®F PlanningCommissioners&ewportbeachca.gov NFIVpDRt ®ryPC' CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name /I PQ Address cr City, State Zi Code Email Phone 3 g2 the bar en "Cotrti It"ing the effort or improving Mariners I\9ile,by working closely wilh life city of Neivport and Its iesidenti�' O�yVEO OY Mayor Diane Dixon 0 MUNI�y ddixon@newportbeachca.gov pOM EN OEVSLOPMS Chair Peter Koetting OCR p 9 1019 pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov O�Ty OF � Newport Beach Planning Commission gr�Pc PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov NEWPOO CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newporibeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name `, 'ea Vt t_Gt lM!U D S Address 16-r LUM I i t St; City,State,Zip Code�USaz. (I lQ�Tr Ck "N I Z 7 Email Phone 3 g3 Ike 6ar en "0?otiouing the effort of in,PI ovi n,i"I'Iriners Mi1c,by wurhiuh closely with Iherity of\en url eud iI oideld, �IiNTi. !Y?iY Mayor Diane Dixon ddixon@newporibeachea.gov Chair Peter Koetting QCZ pkoetting@hewportbeachea.gov CITV of Newport Beach Planning Commission �C-kl PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov 4 WpoRt CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MiNova@newponbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside, Sincerely, Name L eIa ,- A crr Address 7�GahpAIn s r . City, State,Zip Code UWJ Email Phone 3 g� tke 6arJen GEIVEDa�, "Cbn tinning 111,effort of improving Mariners•Mile,by wm'ki ng clnse.ly n•iI I the city of iNewporI and its tesidtnt COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mayor Diane Dixon OCT 0 9 2019 ddixon@newportbeachca.gov CITY OF Chair Peter Koetting ft Ga pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov WSORT 0EP Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name Address City,State,Zip Code Jki Email Phone 3 g,5 the Garden "Cmrtinuing the effort of improving Nlariners Mile,by working closely with the city of New porl and its a5idenis" GEIVED BY Mayor Diane Dixon COM UNIS, T ddixon@newportbeachca.gov pEgEUpPMEN Chair Peter Koetting 9 2�19 pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov OISY of Newport Beach Planning Commission G� S 0�P PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov ntFWPpR CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, 4 Name ! '1�l \�� s) ::. Address City,State,Zip Code Email Phone 3gC tke bar en "Couiinu i I g the effoIl of i I p I oving%lariners Alihf,by xvnrking[IUcrlanvilh the pill!of Nn1Pori curl ii,u.=ideals' 9Y Q�P. Qg(�I��QMEc� Mayor Diane Dixon to t- ddixon@newportbeachca.gov Chair Peter Koetting G\'C'tOF Q poetting@newportbeachca.gov ,6 ty�lip0� Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon, Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name "'' J I �(�. ��/ @G(U / 6-1 Address �( �� 7 City,State,Zip Code . r Email Phone 3�� the 6arJen SOS\VED BY "Cnntnrniue.the effort.of improving Mariners Mile,by nrorking closely with the city Of f`�ew,r.� I !;Itl its ecsilJovi", COMMUNITY OVEX�OPMENT September 23,2019 OC 0 9 2p19 Mayor Diane Dixon Chair Koetting&Commissioners of- Newport Beach Planning Commission AftpORT 0EP0� PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height,setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed.re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, r Name Address 1616 C CA n1 i + V3 fZ City,State,Zip Code Co 5 4 A dywC SA Email Phone 3g8 tke 6arJen G 8V 'i.untinu in"the effort of ioipi oving,iN4ariners iNti le,I y working;clnsely�with the city of Newliort,,r:i it i:-:ii;-nt, PC e%VFD Y T pEVE�OPMEN September 23,2019 OCj O 9 2Q\9 Mayor Diane Dixon Chair Koetting&Commissioners C�1Y pF Newport Beach Planning Commission NpRz e�PG PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height,setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name Address y �} n�z✓� C �,/,�/ City,State,Zip Code (�57--f Email Phone 3 g9 the 6arJen I.,'-Dolimiing!hv r:f of I of improving iM"'il ler:.Mile,by working doscly with Shw city of.'.c;,iyur!and its a:•,nSrnt>•.. 6�\J�O B Y Q00000. September 23,2019 p �e Mayor Diane Dixon 9 Chair Koetting&Commissioners �l of Newport Beach Planning Commission G� 00v PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov lypAg� CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner, City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's-adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height,setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name Q}^— L�4 Zn �--- Address 3Z7 Z� — City,State,Zip Code �!/✓� Z�Z Email Phone 3J°D the 6arJen "C.ni,tinuiny,the offort ni im pi ovinh Mariners Ni le,by working closely with the oh,4 Wwporl.mn rv,;4ient," S%%JED By Nt September 23,2019 000tA MENT DE�ELOP Mayor Diane Dixon Chair Koetting&Commissioners Newport Beach Planning Commission GtTy OF PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov p¢� NEWPORT ®� CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height,setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, f Name c Address 2 3 5- 0, CAl ,tf S City,State,Zip Code0l'l Email Phone 391 the 6ar en "t'rgNino ing,the effort of inrprovin fvIarinvfs.'vfi Ie,by%vnrkin,closetr wiIII lho[ilV of Ne:voorl a.:rl it-,�rnidc Its•' O'SIVED B . M T pE�Et.OPMEtd September 23,2019 �Ct'®9 2p19 Mayor Diane Dixon Chair Koetting&Commissioners OPt t of i Newport Beach Planning Commission Nf�uP�Rt O�P� PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height, setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name (A I R(\ S4 of A ' L I Address�I� '� '22ois Am, Ave, City,State,Zip Code CCI c s,5g,, 0- _/ zu Email Phone sJ2 the 6ar en it u;iny;the rffort of imprmdn+,blzrinms Mile,6v working closely with Ih:City Pf'yro;pn;1 and ii'�r-.a:rt�.•�a;," September 23,2019 ���vi l) 81 Mayor Diane Dixon DBE ovovo Chair Koetting&Commissioners ®9 TO Beach Planning Commission oC1 PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach b�INPORt �WF MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height,setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerel \ Name V)U�JG�(l� Address �I 4 City,State,Zip Code 'V 6L 1�A q I Zc%2—'7 Email Phone 3J°3 the 6ar en `C roIi n ui Ile,the effutt W in INrnving�'Marinets ibti le.ha working duselp with U10 tit•:of ibr.IVpon.an:'1 iI!;u•HIdr,It•... Ov UNtYY September 23,2019 GotA ERA �E�E�pPM Mayor Diane Dixon 6 9 ZQ19 Chair Koetting&Commissioners Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov ct1V OP 2 G CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach IVEWPORT OAP MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautifiil city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. 1 am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height,setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfirlly, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincere)y, ,. I � Name Address City,State,Zip Code r e Email Phone 39� the Garden Gg1VE By "Continuing the effort orimprnviug Mainers A9ilq t>y+vurkiug closely with lhn.city or Newport and it irSid.n�Q N1TY De E OPMENT Mayor Diane Dixon �Cj 9 2p19 ddixon@newportbeachca.gov ®F Chair Peter Koetting G1TY csZ pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov 1y ®qS 0F°� Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name G{'/� !. \ L1 ( �'y''✓ Address (a(n�!� kJ City,State,Zip Code Email Phone 3J°5 tke 6arJen 'Continuing the efforl of improving il'I;mineis.iM ile.by workinti dusely with the city of Ncwrnrl and ilc ��GEIVED @V COMMUNITY Mayor Diane Dixon DEVELOPMENT ddixon@newportbeachca.gov ACT p 9 2019 Chair Peter Koetting poetting@newportbeachca.gov CITY OF PGA Newport Beach Planning Commission 44WpORT 6� PlariningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, 1 ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, \ Name I ,1 _ Address �T TI tw � City,State,Zip Code Email Phone 3J°C the 6arJen 'l nulifuiinr,ill,erhorl of improv inp.Ri oine"Mile,h•r worknie closely with the(ity of 1"Ild if-,iecid�uly` ��GgIVUNIT' Mayor Diane Dixon COWA 7 ddixon@newportbeachca.gov DEVEop"EN Chair Peter Keening OCT pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov 0111N`�F d Newport Beach Planning Commission �FtT,gE PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, n Name (� l Address I 4 uyv L G 3 City,State,Zip Code C N 2 Email Phone 3�� Ike Garden "Confinuing the effmtof ini proving Nlartners Nl ile,by wort:it rlo.wlp with the tit}'of No'burl and iIc:iesid!lit �CEIVED gy Mayor Diane Dixon COMMUNE ddixon@newportbeachca.gov DEVELOPMENT Chair Peter Koetting �CZ.0 9 2019 pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov OIf r OF Newport Beach Planning Commission �PGr PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov OW 9 CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, i77> Name Address Z.S L i f`tt)ac r City,State,Zip Code L�A CIA- Email Phone 3J°8 the Garden "Continuing the effod of improving Mariners Mile,by workiugdoselywill It Iw city of New port and ii;:wsiden O%JED By G qM MUN OslisloPtAtJ Mayor Diane Dixon OCR ddixon@newportbeachca.gov Chair Peter Koetting ON,(DP aZ, pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov NWPORS gEP Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, 6 � Name Address City,State,Zi Code �. S << v `P S eL 7 Email Phone 3�J the 6ar en "Continuing the effort of imprnvhig Mariners A1ilin,by xvorkh%,closely will->Pi :_it,of Newport,jod ih residents" D By Q�ro UNITY CO.MM T Mayor Diane Dixon OI VE�ppMEN ddixon@newportbeachca.gov 9 ZO19 Chair Peter Koetting pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov OITY OF G Newport Beach Planning Commission NfPORT 9�P PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development.utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, ,Il Name W`� \.�'� 1� \ C�Allr L Address 2 City,State,Zip Code STfa- 4= 77- �� � T Email Phone 400 tke Garden "Cmrtinuing the effortof improving Marinee;s Mile,by working dosel.v with Ibre city of Newport and i1r,residents° �NED BY 4,G �pll'\y Q' p�teD �\yt Mayor Diane Dixon ddixon@newportbeachca.gov OCR 09 tip\9 Chair Peter Koetting poetting@newportbeachea.gov G\��F Q �P Newport Beach Planning Commission NEWPOV0 9 PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Qp i Name ��✓V„ Address DV �L- 74 V & City,State,Zip Code CaS Email Phone -401 the Garden "Coutinui[IV,the effort of improving Mari tiers Mile,by n•orl<iog closely rvilii the,citp of Neer)am1 and it rrsi drnl<'• Mayor Diane Dixon EKED By ddixon@newportbeachca.gov Chair Peter Koetting pEVE��PMENT poetting@newportbeachca.gov OCR ®g DNS Newport Beach Planning Commission TY OF PlanningCommissioneis@newportbeachca.gov Gt r-t, �P CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach 1VftPORt 0 MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, 1 ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, I Name Address j d d VA ///n J �Q City,State,Zip Code_ Email Phone 402 the 6ar en "Continuing the effort of improving Mariners D9i Ie,by working,closely wit]i the city of:Newport and its r,:aiJ¢nls" ��OEIVED ap Mayor Diane Dixon COMMUNITY ddixon@newportbeachca.gov DEVELOPMENT Chair Peter Koetting OCT 0 9 2019 pkoetting@newportbeachea.gov CITY OF Newport Beach Planning Commission _%.WpORT OEPC� PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name 0OLPj?1 Address ��— City,State,Zip Code C(A-C - ML.:X 2(�L q2ed4,?-(� Email Phone 403 the Garden "Continuing the effort of improving Mariners Mile,by working closely with the city of Newport and it::residanr;" 0cENED gF commutmv September 23,2019 DEVELOPMENT Mayor Diane Dixon 0CT 0 9 2019 Chair Koetting&Commissioners Newport Beach Planning Commission el-ry OF PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov N u �oar BEP CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautifiil city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height,setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely,, Name / yG & L V/kf , / Wa JL/ Address -0 33 W(rN►�Y PiL✓ ��R/ � City,State,Zip Code P—A= 1-j/\ G Email Phone �FD�f i the Garden "Continoingthe effort of improving Mariners Mile,by working closely with the city of Newport and its residents" September 23,2019 ,V SCEtvEo gy COMMUNITY Mayor Diane Dixon DEVELOPMENT Chair Koetting&Commissioners OCT 0 9 2019 Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningComrnissioners@newportbeachca.gov CITY of CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach N�vpOaT 6EPG MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height, setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name� �)1f/�cfs1 I/I^� �(aCf VCf rC't I Address U� I �� lj City,State,Zip Code L7 Email Phone 405 the Garden "i:on>inuin•the effort of Im rw•in Mariners frLle,Up inn,rkin,n,dosel y Lei l}l the ri?•of i'�ct�!!;P9.n]!G'���. lrz \VED BV OOMM�N ENT September 23, 2019 OEVE�oPM act 0 9 Zo�9 Mayor Diane Dixon Chair Koetting&Commissioners O\Ty OF Newport Beach Planning Commission PGt PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov &ZWPOR( CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height, setback,etc). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name�Ty/19/. 0 I�1/ ` ,VI�/� Address 1In 2):V.114 ��``,,� City,State,Zip Code l/��� �Ih�IV C/A q Z(P 2-1- Email Phone 40C �'00 `��N,T'( Ike 6ar en DE�E�OpMENT "Continuing the effort of improving Nl:rrimm iNaile.,by working closely with lhr city of and rts residenls'• Qlr1 0 LO,g September 23,2019 QP Mayor Diane Dixon &INRORt 0 Chair Koetting&Commissioners Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner, City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height,setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely � Name I t'J DN Address �02_ J V v Inn City, State,Zip Code��,'"`�'��y(_ft U.`4'S CA qU Email Phone 40j the Garden "Con lin Eli ug the Clfort of ill iprovifig dlariners Mile,by marking closely witlit lie cil}'nf i\'rwgnirt and ils rc.idcnls commutal pPMF"' n��l OCT 0 9 2019 Mayor Diane Dixon ddixon@newportbeachca.gov piN OF Chair Peter Koetting �wpp{�tP pkoetting@ncwportbeachca.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, 1 currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height, setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. , The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely,, Nam Address City, State,Zip Code Email Phone 402 tke 6arJen "G)II HIIa iu, the a•IrU❑of inlpn n,ino IN hri nere;yl ile.by Wort.i ng CIcpse Iv with the City of diewp)rl and its ii•;i;h.'Na" DECEIVED By COMMUNITY Mayor Diane Dixon DEVELOPMENT ddixon@newportbeachca.gov OCT 0 9 2019 Chair Peter Koetting CITY of pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission 414VPORT BEPG`A PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning acquirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name J� \ — ) Address 0I, �1 City,State,Zip Code C Email Phone �09 the 6arJen oi;I im,ink the effmI of imptoring?Axin.ars il3ile.by wvrkitigt Iosel p with tho city of N!:Vrnn;t im,I ii•, esidc•n�•" PECEIVEp By September 23,2019 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mayor Diane Dixon OCT 092019 Chair Koetting&Commissioners Newport Beach Planning Commission CITY OF PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachea.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach "r"ORT 80`0 MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautifiil city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height, setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefiilly designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name Address City,State,Zip Code T 1 Email Phone -410 Ike Garden EtVEDgy "( naini,iing the effoi1 of improving i�Inrtners\tile,by rvorl.:im'[Iviceh'++'iNi the cep•nF�'lc+v(�arl anA it<.n�Q7 4l."E tT° COMM DEVE� PMFN� Mayor Diane Dixon cc, 9 2�`•y ddixon@newportbeachca.gov CI'f`I'pF Chair Peter Koetting pkoetting@newportbeachca.govYPpsi Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC:Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely Name 7 tgme5 UiG2FtVA — Address f ql�OZ City,State,Zip Code H ea c Email Phone -4 11 the 6ar en °��J�JaBy�� "Cont imiing Hu: Ito of improving iYlari sic cs Mile,by worlriug closely with the city of i\'rmpnrt auJ il..rO�ilfC�(rle"04 r�Q \Q OF �r Mayor Diane Dixon 5 �Q ddixon@newportbeachca.gov 0 e NEWPO Chair Peter Koetting pkoetting@newportbeachca.gov Newport Beach Planning Commission PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca,gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, 1 currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the ci y's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name �1,t/�.Z• %1 'n/� ff' Address l nn � YJvti� City, State,Zip CodeEmail PhonePhone i -4 22 i Ike 6ar en "Confirming the effort of improving Mariners Vlile,by working closely with the oily of Pien•uoIt a)of its rrsicknI s" Gviel) BY 1VX M 01IN September 23,2019 coM PMENt Mayor Diane Dixon �' J Chair Koetting&Commissioners �C Newport Beach Planning Commission o\t t Of PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov P� NEwpo k, CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachca.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re- development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists,increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements(height,setback,etc). Additionally,I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful,and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. 1 think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully,I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, Name He l Address City, State,Zip Code Email Phone -423 Ike 6ar en "Co ntinui nt;the Won of iug Mai iuer,Ni ih{t,y wurkim„rlusd-v with ihe.city ul Ncwpurl and it<nt;idr,,I, G.S\VED BY M ,,o Mayor Diane Dixon COO. Ovl't ddixon@newportbeachca.gov oC� 09 2p�9 Chair Peter Koetting pkoetting@newportbeachea.gov Otty OF Pc' Newport Beach Planning Commission NEyypp(tT 9� PlanningComm issioners@newportbeachca.gov CC: Makana Nova,Associate Planner,City of Newport Beach MNova@newportbeachea.gov Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Mayor Dixon,Chair Koetting&Commissioners, I currently reside in our beautiful city of Newport Beach,close to the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside which is presently before the Commission. I am supporting this project as it reduces the mass and scale of the existing structure,adds landscaping where none currently exists, increases the city's adjacent parkland by removing existing encroachments and conforms to all city zoning requirements (height,setback,etc.). Additionally, I am highly appreciative of the added parking capacity that is planned for this development to accommodate workers that currently park in the heights. It is a responsible decision for the City to support a project that increases the parking supply in this area and reduces density. The Garden development is beautiful, and this structure has been carefully designed not to impact the views of residents and the added landscape perimeter creates a buffer between homes and the structure. I think highly of this development utilizing quality materials to enhance the aesthetics of the commercial area. Respectfully, I ask the Planning Commission to approve the proposed re-development of 215 Riverside. Sincerely, NametGY/�lr���/L Address City, State,Zip Code Email Phone 414 B- R D I N G WE I L BERDING&WEIL LLP COSTA MESA ATTORNEYS AT LAW 575 Anton Boulevard Suite 1080 Metro Center Mesa, Costa Mesa,CA 92626 714.429.0600 714.429.0699 1 October 8, 2019 5AN DIEGO 1660 Hotel Cirde Nurth Suite 701 San Diego,CA 92108 858.625.3900 VIA E-MAIL ONLY 858.625.3901 1 WALNUT CREEK Planning Commission 2175 N.CaIBornia Blvd. 00 City of Newport Beach Wanes Creek,CA 94596 100 Civic Center Drive 925.838.2090 Newport Beach, CA 92660 925.820.5592 1 Email: glanningcommissioners@newportbeachca.goy WWW.BERDINGWEIL.COM Re: The Garden Office and Parking Structure Proposed Project Dear Chair Koetting and Fellow Commissioners: This letter concerns the City of Newport Beach's ("City") Planning Commission's ("Planning Commission") continued public hearing on October 17, 2019 with regard to the Garden Office and Parking Structure matter. Specifically, the project applicant, 215 Riverside LLC ("Applicant"), requests that the Planning Commission approve Coastal Development Permit No. CD2019-023, Conditional Use Permit No. UP2019-0031, and Modification Permit No. MD2019-003 (collectively the "Requested Entitlements") to demolish the existing office and restaurant building and associated 17 surface parking spaces and construct a new 2,830 square foot office building and multi-level parking structure containing 47 spaces ("Proposed Project"2) at 215 Riverside Avenue ("215 Riverside"). Our office is legal counsel for Ernest Castro (2915 Cliff Drive), Jack Staub (2911 Cliff Drive), Stefanie and Troy Pilalas (2907 Cliff Drive), Hal Woods (2919 Cliff Drive), three of which own homes contiguous with 215 Riverside and the fourth owns a house overlooking 215 1 The Conditional Use Permit is required because the Applicant desires to construct a parking structure adjacent to a residential zone. The City's Zoning Code at section 20.40.070(B)(3) provides: "When adjacent to a residential zoning district, the development of structured parking, including rooftop parking, shall require the approval of a conditional use permit to address potential impacts to adjacent residential uses." The City's Zoning Code thus mandates that the Planning Commission consider the impact of the Proposed Project on the Adjacent Homeowners and either deny a requested conditional use permit if the Proposed Project's "potential impacts" will be too significant on the Adjacent Homeowners, or, at minimum, condition approval of the requested conditional use permit for the Proposed Project with sufficient requirements to resolve the "potential impacts" on the Adjacent Homeowners. Critical here, section 20.40.070(B)(3) uses the term "potential impacts," which requires that the Planning Commission consider all potential uses of the Proposed Project and resolve the potential impacts due to those potential uses. 2 As discussed below, while the Applicant has separated the proposed project at 215 Riverside from its proposed restaurant project across the street at 2902 West Coast Highway, the two are integrally related and must be considered as one project. PLEASE REPLY TO OUR COSTA MESA OFFICE 415 Planning Commission City of Newport Beach October 8, 2019 Page 2 Riverside (collectively the "Adjacent Homeowners"). The Adjacent Homeowners will each be materially and substantially negatively impacted by the Proposed Project, which is next door to their homes. The Adjacent Homeowners' homes relative to the Proposed Project is depicted on Attachment "A" to this letter. The Adjacent Homeowners respectfully request that the Planning Commission deny the Requested Entitlements because the Applicant has purposefully submitted an incomplete application for the Proposed Project to facilitate unlawful project-splitting, and the approval of the Requested Entitlements would violate applicable laws, including, in part, the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), Public Resources Code ("Pub. Res. Code") sections 21000 et seq., and the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act ("Guidelines"), California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3. The Application for the Proposed Project is Incomplete Since it is Inextricably Linked to the Proposed Garden Restaurant Proiect Gary Jarbara, the principal of the Applicant, is also the owner of the Garden Shopping Center ("Garden Shopping Center") located across Avon Street from 215 Riverside. On January 14, 2019, Mr. Jarbara filed application number PA2019-006 with the City for entitlements relating to the proposed Garden Restaurant in the Garden Shopping Center at 2902 West Coast Highway ("Proposed Restaurant Project"). The City determined that a coastal development permit, operator license, site development review, traffic study, and use permit would be required for the Proposed Restaurant Project. The City's website indicates that it transmitted a letter to the applicant on August 15, 2019 that the application for the Proposed Restaurant Project was incomplete, which is the last status entry. The Staff Report for the Planning Commission's August 22, 2019 public hearing concerning the Proposed Project ("Staff Report") indicated that: "The project is intended to support off-site parking for future restaurants with The Garden shopping center located south of the project site across Avon Street" and that "[a] separate conditional use permit is requested as part of a proposed restaurant at 2902 West Coast Highway for off-site parking and to establish a parking management plan for the shopping center including valet parking for the proposed structure." (Page 5.) The Parking Management Plan submitted by the Applicant from RK Engineering Group, Inc. dated May 16, 2019 in support of the Proposed Project ("Parking Management Plan"), included as Attachment No. PC 3 to the Staff Report, states that "[t]he remaining 35 non-tandem parking spaces onsite [at the Proposed Project's parking structure] will be utilized for overflow parking from restaurant use located at 2902 West Coast Highway." (Page 2.) The Parking Management Plan adds that the 35 non-office related parking spaces "will satisfy the off-site parking requirements for the CUP application for 2902 West Coast Highway.") (Page 2.) Despite the above, the Applicant has contended that the Proposed Project and the Proposed Restaurant Project are separate. Even more confounding, City's Staff has supported the Applicant's demonstrably false argument that the two projects are separate. They are not. As set forth in the Staff Report and the materials submitted by the Applicant in support of the WWW.BERDING WEIB B- R D I N G.COM I Y I Y "T1( Planning Commission City of Newport Beach October 8, 2019 Page 3 Proposed Project, the unequivocal intent of the Applicant is to include the proposed parking structure's 35 new non-office related parking spaces to the potential Garden Restaurant's tenant for valet and other parking purposes. The conditional use permit for offsite parking requested for the Proposed Restaurant Project is to be satisfied through the Proposed Project's parking structure. Simply put, the two projects have been expressly and explicitly tied together by the Applicant, as acknowledged by the City, and thus, at minimum, the City is required to consider the proposed parking structure as part of the Proposed Restaurant Project's application. As a result, the Adjacent Homeowners request that the City deem the Proposed Project's application to be incomplete and require that it be joined with the application for the Proposed Restaurant Project so both projects can properly be considered together. The Adjacent Homeowners thank Chairperson Koetting and Commissioner Ellmore for their support in this regard during the August 22, 2019 and October 3, 2019 public hearings and respectfully urge the remaining Commissioners to support the some. The Proposed Project Would Violate CEQA's Proiect-Solittina Prohibition Given the foregoing nexus, CEQA requires that the City consider the environmental impacts of the Proposed Project's parking structure together with the Proposed Restaurant Project. "A public agency may not divide a single project into smaller individual projects in order to avoid its responsibility to consider the environmental impacts of the project as a whole." (Sierra Club v. West Side Irrigation District (2005) 128 Cal.App.4th 690, 698.) This is because CEQA's requirements "cannot be avoided by chopping up proposed projects into bite-size pieces which, individually considered, might be found to have no significant effect on the environment or to be only ministerial." (Topanga Beach Renters Assn. v. Department of General Services (1976) 58 Cal.App.3d 188, 195-196; See also, Bozung v. Local Agency Formation Commission (1975) 13 Cal.3d 263, 283-284.) As a result, not only is the environmental analysis incomplete when split into sub-projects, but appropriate mitigation measures may be erroneously omitted. For CEQA purposes, a "project" means "the whole of an action, which has the potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment (Guidelines § 15378.) As explained in Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Arcata Not. Corp. (1976) 59 Cal.App.3d 959 at page 969, "in elaborating on the definition of the term 'project,' the Guidelines emphatically underline that it means the Whole of an action which has the potential for physical impact on the environment, and that 'The term `project' refers to the underlying activity and not the governmental approval process.'" As a result, separate activities constitute one "project" when "both activities are integral parts of the same project" (Id.) or "the future expansion or action will be significant in that it will likely change the scope or nature of the initial project or its environmental effects" (Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of the University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 396). Here, as set forth in the Staff Report and the materials submitted by the Applicant in support of the Proposed Project, the Proposed Project's parking structure is an integral part of the Proposed Restaurant Project since it is intended to be used in connection with the Garden WWW.BERDING WEIB.COM B- R D I N G I W- I L 427 Planning Commission City of Newport Beach October 8, 2019 Page 4 Restaurant and it is intended to satisfy the requirements of the conditional use permit sought for the Garden Restaurant for offsite parking. The Proposed Restaurant Project, based upon the current application, would not be possible but for the creation of 35 extra parking spaces through the Proposed Project. Moreover, since the use of the Proposed Project's parking structure has been tied to the Garden Restaurant's operation, the subsequent approval of the Garden Restaurant's operation would constitute a significant future expansion or action as it would likely change the scope and nature of the Proposed Project and the Proposed Project's environmental effects since the Proposed Project's parking structure would not merely be for surplus parking from the Garden Shopping Center, but rather would be a dedicated, ongoing use for parking to facilitate the Garden Restaurant's operation. The Applicant's unlawful attempt to piecemeal is critically important because the City has wrongfully considered the environmental impacts of the Proposed Project in a vacuum without considering the integrated role it will play with the Proposed Restaurant Project and the cumulative environmental impacts of the two proposed projects together. The Applicant has purposefully separated the two inextricably linked projects in order to avoid CEQA's required substantive environmental review of the projects. Separating the projects has made it easier for the Applicant to wrongly contend that the Proposed Project is subject to a categorical exemption from CEQA's requirements. The Applicant has already made the same specious claim with respect to the Proposed Restaurant Project, which the City's Staff indicated during the Planning Commission's August 22, 2019 public hearing is presently being analyzed. The environmental studies purportedly supporting the Proposed Project's eligibility for a Class 32 categorical exemption narrowly examine the anticipated use of the Proposed Project without any influence from the Proposed Restaurant Project. This both wrongly minimizes the foreseeable environmental impacts of the Proposed Project to a less-than-significant basis by excluding environmental ramifications of the interconnected use of the two projects and avoids cumulatively analyzing the foreseeable environmental impacts of the two projects together such that they may individually be less-than-significant. As a practical example, the Proposed Restaurant Project seeks approval for the Garden Restaurant to operate until 1:00 a.m. from Friday through Sunday. Given the intended use of the Proposed Project's parking structure for benefit of the Garden Restaurant, there will be foot traffic between the Garden Restaurant and the Proposed Project site, which is separated by Avon Street and most of the Garden Shopping Center and vehicular traffic entering and existing the Proposed Project site until after 1:00 a.m. on those days. None of the environmental studies purportedly to support the Applicant's Class 32 exemption account for or include the foreseeable significant impacts from this interconnected use. The Adjacent Homeowners have grave concerns about the noise, light and glare, traffic and circulation, and aesthetic environmental impacts of the Proposed Project, particularly when applied to the sought use of the Proposed Project's parking structure for purposes of the Garden Restaurant's operation, which, contrary to CEQA's requirements, simply have not been analyzed in the technical reports purportedly supporting the Applicant's requested exemption. Given the foregoing, CEQA requires that the Proposed Project and the Proposed WWW.BERDING WEIB.coM B- R D I N G I W� - I L ' 18 Planning Commission City of Newport Beach October 8, 2019 Page 5 Restaurant Project be considered together as one "project" and that appropriate environmental review of that "project" be completed. The Proposed Project does not Quality for a Class 32 Cateaorical Exemption The Applicant seeks to avoid required environmental review of the Proposed Project by speciously asserting it is subject to a Class 32 categorical exemption from CEQA's requirements. Guidelines section 15332 provides that a Class 32 exemption applies for "projects characterized as in-fill development meeting conditions described in this section." Those conditions are: "(a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services." Even if a proposed project might qualify for a Class 32 exemption, that exemption will not apply if any of the exceptions listed in Guidelines section 15300.2 applies to the proposed project. (See, Bloom v. McGurk (1994) 26 Cal.App.4th 1307, 1312.) Relevant to the Proposed Project, exceptions listed in section 15300.2 include: "(b) Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. (c) Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances." The Proposed Project does not qualify for a Class 32 exemption because it is not consistent with all applicable general plan policies, the potential significant effects of the Proposed Project relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality have not been appropriately analyzed, and the City has failed to analyze the exceptions to the potential exemption. WWW.BERDING WEIB.COM B- R D I N G i W- I L 429 Planning Commission City of Newport Beach October 8, 2019 Page 6 The Proposed Project is not Consistent with Applicable General Plan Policies The Proposed Project does not qualify for a Class 32 categorical exemption because is not consistent with all applicable general plan policies. For example, the policy set forth in LU 5.2.2 Buffering Residential Areas of the General Plan provides that the City is to "[r]equire that commercial uses adjoining residential neighborhoods be designed to be compatible and minimize impacts through such techniques as: Incorporation of landscaping, decorative walls, enclosed trash containers, downward focused lighting fixtures, and/or comparable buffering elements; Attractive architectural treatment of elevators facing the residential neighborhood; Location of automobile and truck access to prevent impacts on neighborhood traffic and privacy." The Proposed Project's creation of a two-story parking structure is incompatible with the adjoining residential houses and fails to adequately minimize impacts by facilitating the parking of nearly three times the number of vehicles than 215 Riverside's current configuration, many of which will be substantially closer to the residential houses than the current configuration, and which will be used far more frequently and in a substantially more intrusive manner than the current configuration, including the previously non-existent nighttime use. As another example, the policy set forth in LU 6.19 states that Mariners' Mile to be "[a] corridor that reflects and the takes advantage of its location on the Newport Bay waterfront, supports and respects adjacent residential neighborhoods and exhibits a quality visual image for travelers on Coast Highway." As set forth in the preceding paragraph, the Proposed Project's parking structure facilitates an intensity of use that fails to respect the adjoining residential houses. As a further example, the policy set forth in CE 7.1 .8 Parking Configuration calls for "[s]ite and design new development to avoid use of parking figuration or management programs that are difficult to maintain and enforce." The Proposed Project's parking structure being offsite from the Garden Restaurant and intended to be used for valet parking creates a difficult parking figuration and management program as identified by the requirement that the City issue a conditional use permit to allow the same. Moreover, the use of tandem parking spaces intended to serve both those working in and visiting the Proposed Project's office building also creates a difficult parking figuration and a parking management program that is difficult to maintain and enforce; Chairperson Koetting acknowledged the same in his questioning to the City's Staff during the August 22, 2019 public hearing. The Applicant has proposed to satisfy the 12 required office-dedicated parking spaces through unconventional and tedious tandem parking spaces—with employees parking in the tandem's back space and customers parking in the tandem's front space—so that the Applicant can maximize the number of non-office dedicated parking spaces in the Proposed Project's parking structure for purposes of the Garden Restaurant's operation. The City has not Sufficiently Analyzed the Proposed Project's Potential Significant Effects Relatina to Traffic, Noise, Air Quality, and Water Quality The Proposed Project does not qualify for a Class 32 categorical exemption because the City has not analyzed whether the Proposed Project would potentially have significant WWW.BERDING WEIB.coM B- R D I N G I W- I L 20 Planning Commission City of Newport Beach October 8, 2019 Page 7 effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, and water quality. Most notably, the City's environmental analysis of the Proposed Project is incomplete and deficient since it has narrowly examined the environmental impacts of the Proposed Project without considering the Proposed Restaurant Project. As set forth above, the Proposed Project and the Proposed Restaurant Project are one "project" for CEQA purposes and the environmental impacts of the same must be considered together. Since the City has not done so there is not substantial evidence in the record to potentially support a finding that the Proposed Project will not have potentially significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, and water quality. Exemplifying this failure, no traffic study supports the requested Class 32 categorical exemption and thus the potential significant environmental impacts of the Proposed Project in terms of traffic and circulation have not been studied or considered by the City. This is because the City did not require the Applicant to prepare a traffic study as the City calculated the average daily trips attributable to the Proposed Project based only on the Proposed Project's office use. (Staff Report at p. 5 & "Trip Generation Calculations" at p. 82 of Staff Report.) The problem is the Proposed Project's parking structure expressly is not limited to the Proposed Project's office use. Calculating the average daily trips attributable to the Proposed Project based solely on its office use fails to reflect the intended use of the Proposed Project as a whole by incompletely and misleadingly limiting the trip generation calculation to only one of multiple intended uses—thereby ignoring any trips attributable to the intended use of 35 non-office related parking spaces for purposes of the Garden Restaurant's operation. The administrative record therefore fails to support a potential finding that the Proposed Project will not generate an increase of 300 average daily trips, thereby triggering the requirement for the preparation of a traffic study. Given this failure, there is not substantial evidence in the administrative record to support a potential finding that the Proposed Project will not have a significant effect on the environment in terms of traffic and circulation. Also demonstrating the failure of the City to properly analyze the environmental impacts of the Proposed Project, the Staff Report notes the noise and light/glare disturbances that parking facilities may have on adjacent residences yet concludes that "[t]he proposed parking structure provides more parking spaces ... but the impacts from vehicle movements will be similar to that of existing conditions." (Page 6.) Contradicting that conclusion, the Staff Report notes on the next page that "[f]he increased parking supply for the area may potentially result in more activity and additional late night activities (noise, headlights, and valet operations) if the spaces are authorized as off-site parking for other uses in the area" and that "[t]he operation and use of the surplus parking will be analyzed in detail as part of a parking management plan for off-site parking with a conditional use permit for these future uses." (Page 7.) Given the Applicant's express intention to use the 35 non-office related parking spaces of the Proposed Project's parking structure for the Garden Restaurant, the City must analyze the environmental impacts of the Proposed Project's parking structure use for both office and the Garden Restaurant's purposes. That analysis has not been completed and thus again, the administrative record does not contain substantive evidence to support a potential finding that the Proposed Project will not have a significant effect on the environment in terms of noise and light/glare. WWW.BERDING WEIB.COM B- R D I N G 1 W - 1 L "T�2 Planning Commission City of Newport Beach October 8, 2019 Page 8 The City has not Analyzed the Exceptions to a Potential Class 32 Cateaorical Exemption The City's analysis of the Proposed Project's eligibility for a Class 32 categorical exemption is necessarily incomplete and unsupportable since it does not consider or analyze whether any of the Guidelines section 15300.2 exceptions apply to the Proposed Project. For example, Guidelines section 15300.2, subdivision (b)'s exception based on cumulative impacts has not been addressed in any fashion. In the unforeseeable situation that the Planning Commission disagrees with the above project-splitting problems, at minimum, the Proposed Project and the Proposed Restaurant Project would contribute to cumulative impacts given the discussed nexus between the projects and those cumulative impacts have not been addressed in any manner through the City's analysis to date thus making the City's Class 32 categorical exemption analysis fatally deficient. As another example, Guidelines section 15300.2, subdivision (c)'s exception based upon significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances has not be discussed. The Proposed Project presents "unusual circumstances" because its parking structure is intended to be used for offsite valet parking for the Garden Restaurant. The City's requirement that a conditional use permit be granted for such offsite parking demonstrates that the City considers such a configuration to be unusual, otherwise a discretionary entitlement would not be required for the some. The "unusual circumstance" has a direct nexus to a reasonable possibility of the Proposed Project having significant environmental impacts in terms of noise, light/glare, aesthetics, and traffic/circulation due to the incredible increase in the intensity of use versus existing conditions, which has not been considered and analyzed by the City as set forth above. Given the myriad deficiencies with the Proposed Project as set forth in this letter, the Adjacent Homeowners respectfully request that the Planning Commission either deny the Proposed Project or, at a minimum, require that the Proposed Project be considered as part of the some "project" as the Proposed Restaurant Project. Very truly yours, BERDING & WEIL LLP A)) //" Aaron J/.EEhrlich Partner aehrlich@berdingweil.com Enclosure cc: Makana Nova Associate Planner City of Newport Beach Email: mnova@newportbeachca.aov 800.83 .2 WWW.BERDING WEIB.COM B- R D I N G I W - I L 422 Planning Commission City of Newport Beach October 8, 2019 Page 9 James Campbell Deputy Community Development Director City of Newport Beach Email:jcampbell@newportbeachca.aov Seimone Jurjis Community Development Director City of Newport Beach Email: siuriis@newportbeachca.gov Grace K. Leung City Manager City of Newport Beach Email: gleuna@newportbeachca.gov Leilani I. Brown City Clerk City of Newport Beach Email: ]brown@newportbeachca.aov Aaron C. Harp City Attorney City of Newport Beach Email: aharp@newportbeachca.aov WWW.BERDING WEIB.COM B- R D I N G I W- I L 42S Attachment " A " 424 c ` CD Y70 glow � a i U Ja^r �. mn b �. cu •e � N (A � y 1 d' cn / 1 VZX go ,dfl � r tt a- o / LL1 (n ❑ t/7 U o U w _0 r N p 3 6 O x N U N vv b p, From: Lee, Amanda Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2019 7:43 AM To: Nova, Makana Subject: FW: Riverside Ave Project- I AM FOR IT! From: Constance Esposito<constance@dfgnewport.com> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2019 1:01 PM To: Planning Commissioners <PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: Riverside Ave Project- I AM FOR IT! Hello, I received a propaganda flyer from a neighbor to fight this. (Portia Weis who should be banned from anything the City tries to do). I am on your side—I want the further development of these parcels as it add to the Newport Heights area. Thank you, Constance Esposito c 949.355.4464 Ada Virus-free. www.avast.com 420 Nova, Makana From: Lee, Amanda Sent: October 04, 2019 2:27 PM To: Nova, Makana Subject: FW:The Garden Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged -----Original Message----- From: Bob Newberry<banddnewby@aol.com> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2019 2:13 PM To: Planning Commissioners<PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov> Subject:The Garden Comments: We have reviewed the plan and like the overall development. We are also pleased that employee parking is finally being addressed. Since, all noise travels inland from the roof top restaurant,the weekend hours need to close at 11:00 pm.This is the same for the John Wayne Park. Sincerely, Bob and Dianne Newberry 6 Park PI Newport Beach, Ca 92663 Sent from my iPhone 1 Nova, Makana From: Carrie Slayback <carrieslayback@gmail.com> Sent: October 03, 2019 9:08 PM To: Nova, Makana Subject: Fwd: Garden's Roof top dining/parking structure Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Dear Nova, Thank you so much for your response. I don't find reference to the restaurant which is an intrusion into our neighborhood, with 200 person capacity, open until 1:00 a.m. Sound really travels around here. I can hear the NHHS football games which are much farther away than the rooftop of the restaurant. Restaurants have deliveries, large trucks. Please report to me what your and staff project as potential neighborhood impact. The Garden storefront structures are one thing, a parking structure is another, adding square footage atop the structure—overuse. We are a neighborhood, lucky enough to have a view park. A 200 person commercial entity will intrude on our residential/park-recreational community. Sincerely, Carrie Luger Slayback Begin forwarded message: From: "Nova, Makana" <MNova(a)newportbeachca.gov> Subject: RE: Garden's Roof top dining/parking structure Date: September 30, 2019 at 11:18:20 AM PDT To: "'carrieslayback(a)gmail.com"' <carrieslayback(d)gmail.com> Good morning Carrie, I am in receipt of your public comments regarding The Garden Office and Parking Structure and The Garden Restaurant application located at 2902 West Coast Highway. You had inquired about the formal view designations along Cliff Drive so I wanted to pass along some information for you. You can refer to Figure NR3 (Coastal Views)of the City's General Plan and Coastal Land Use Plan, Coastal Views Map 4-3, which identify the two view locations from Cliff Drive Park as well as John Wayne Park in Mariners' Mile as public view points. I'd also like to mention that the project application has prepared view simulations from the Cliff Drive Park view location, which can be viewed in the Planning Commission packet from August 22, 2019, here. Refer to Pages 264 and 285 of the Pdf document. t ��g Please feel free to contact me if you have any other questions regarding this project. Thank you, Makana Nova I ASSOCIATE PLANNER, AICP Planning Division I Community Development Department City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive I Newport Beach, CA 92660 P. 949.644.3249 mnova@newportbeachca.gov www.newportbeachca.gov -----Original Message----- From: Carrie Slayback<carrieslayback@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday,September 26, 2019 8:12 PM To: Planning Commissioners<PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: Garden's Roof top dining/parking structure Dear Planning Commissioners, Please conduct an on site evaluation of The Garden's parking striation and rooftop dining. Please require flags put up so residents know how much park and home views might be affected. Views from Cliff Drive Park, a designated view site, have been altered forever by buildings on PCH. None of them have ever been fully occupied. Please consider carefully the height of this proposal. Please look at traffic, especially ingress and egress as Riverside is the chosen route for bikes to/from school and for bikes and strollers/Junior Lifeguards to/from the beach. Please forward to me and to our Newport Heights Association the original designation of Cliff Drive as a view corridor. I do not know the formal designation. I know this was identified in past council and homeowner discussions. Best, Carrie Luger Slayback 949 646-5902 2 manatt Susan K. Hori Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP Direct Dial: (714) 371-2528 E-mail: shori@manatt.com October 2, 2019 Client-Matter: 63060-030 ViaE-Mail: sjurjis@newportbeachca.gov Seimone .iurjis Director, Community Development Department City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Re: 2.15 Riverside Avenue (Coastal Development Permit No. CD2019-003, Conditional Use Permit No. UP2019-003, and Modification Permit No. MD201.9-003) Dear Scimone: We have received copies of the correspondence sent to the City by residents of Newport Beach regarding the application filed by Laidlaw Schultz Architects on behalf of 2l5 Riverside, LLC, the owner of the existing commercial office and parking lot located at 215 Riverside Avenue. The 215 Riverside application proposes the demolition of the existing 8,056 square feet, 3-story building and parking lot with a 2-story, 2,744 square feet office building and a 2- level parking structure with 41 spaces. We would like to correct for the record the mis-statements and mis-impressions regarding the 215 Riverside project. 1. The Distance Between 215 Riverside and Adjacent Cliff Drive Residences Several comments have been submitted by homeowners along Cliff Drive regarding the proximity of their residences to the proposed project. The proposed office building will be located further away from the property boundary between 215 Riverside and the adjacent residences than the existing commercial structure. Additionally, the project will pull back the proposed parking area from the footprint of the existing parking lot by removing portions of the existing retaining wall, and landscaping those areas with vegetation that will screen much of second level of parking. The overall structure is consistent with the City's required side and rear yard setbacks. 695 Town Center Drive,141h Floor,Costa Mesa,California 92626-1924 Telephone: 714.371.2500 Fax: 714.371.2550 Albany I Boston I Chicago I Los Angeles I New York I Orange County I Palo Alto I Sacramento I San Francisco I Washington, D.C. 430 manatt Seimone Juijis October 2, 2019 Page 2 2. The height of the 215 Riverside Building and Parking Area The proposed office building has been greatly reduced in size, mass and bulk from the building that currently exists on the site, and does not exceed the City's 32 feet height limit for this property. Although the current 3-story building is approximately 28 feet in height, the building occupies a much greater area of the overall project site than the proposed building. The current building extends further into the site given that it is 4 times the size of the proposed building and thus, under existing conditions, more of the site is actually occupied by a structure than with the proposed, smaller building. Io terns of potential view impacts, the second parking level is at 25 feet— which is lower than the current building's roofline that occupies much of the site as well as the height of portions of the finished grade of the existing parking lot. The reduction in the height of the parking level together with the enhanced landscaping on that portion of the project site that abuts residences on Cliff Drive will improve the views, not impede or adversely impact act the existing viewshed. One of the statements that has been made at the public hearing and in correspondence is to describe the proposed parking at 215 Riverside as "roof top" parking. Unlike other proposals that have come before the City, no "roof top" parking is being proposed. Two levels of parking are being designed to accompany the office building, but the upper level is by no means on the roof of the building, and in fact, is lower than the elevation of the existing parking lot. For the adjacent residents, it is also important to understand that in reality the proposed project will reduce, not increase impacts. Currently, there are 17 uncovered, parking spaces provided on the parking lot which is at a higher elevation and closer to the existing residences than what would be provided by the proposed 215 Riverside Project. With project implementation, the upper level of parking will have 22 spaces, 5 of which will be located under a lattice covering, and as with the existing condition, 17 spaces will be uncovered, but will be located further away from the property line and will be surrounded by enhanced landscaping as compared to the existing condition. Taken together, the landscaping, lower elevation, and lattice covering will reduce, not increase impacts over and above what currently exists on site and what will remain on site if the 215 Riverside project does not move forward. 3. The Noise from the Parking Area at 215 Riverside The 215 Riverside project includes 41 parking spaces. A Noise Impact Analysis for the 215 Riverside Project was prepared by Urban Crossroads and was attached to the City's staff report. The study took measurements of the existing noise levels at various locations around the proposed project site. As the existing noise levels reflect, the background ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project site is dominated by existing traffic noise from the existing roads, such as West Coast Highway, Cliff Drive and Riverside Avenue. The noise study measured noise levels from a larger parking lot over a 24-hour period and used it to assess the noise levels at the 215 parking area and concluded that the operational noise levels will not exceed the City's nighttime and daytime noise level standards—even without taking into consideration the existing ambient noise levels that the community experiences from existing traffic. -4 31 manatt Seimone Jurjis October 2, 2019 I. Page 3 4. The Use of Parking Spaces at 215 Riverside Much has been made of the fact that there are more parking spaces being provided at 215 Riverside than actually needed by the proposed commercial office building. This is not unique, however. As both the residents and patrons of businesses in this area know, the availability of parking is an issue. There have been a questions raised in the correspondence as to whether the City should consider this application together with a separate application filed by Phil Edmonson for permits to establish and operate a restaurant at 2902 West Coast Highway on behalf of The Gardenia Romantic Restaurant, LLC ("2902 Restaurant") [PA2019-006; CDP No. CD2019-001; CUP No. UP201.9-001; OL2019-001; Traffic Study No. TS2019-001], even though the 2902 Restaurant application has not even been deemed complete by the City. By law, a public agency may not divide a single project into smaller individual subprojects to avoid responsibility for considering the environmental impact of the project as a whole; however, activities that will operate independently of one another and can be implemented separately may be treated as separate projects by the reviewing agency and under CEQA if one activity is not a foreseeable consequence of the other. See, e.g., Aptos Council v County of Santa Cruz (2017) 10 Cal.App.5th 266, 281 ("when each action has independent utility and does not subsume or necessitate each other, the actions" are properly considered separate for purposes of CEQA). The 215 Riverside Project and the proposed 2902 Restaurant are not inextricably linked and have independent utility. The 2902 Restaurant has been designed as a stand-alone restaurant and the primary use component of 215 Riverside is an office complex. Moreover, 215 Riverside can proceed to final approval and be bui It and operated without construction of the 2902 Restaurant. Conversely, if the 215 Riverside building and parking area were never constructed, the 2902 Restaurant can still proceed to obtain its separate entitlements and open for operation because the 2902 Restaurant is not dependent on the 215 Riverside project. As the City noted, although the parking spaces can be used for future tenants and patrons of the Garden shopping center, it can also be made available to other businesses and off.-site uses in the area(such as boat charters or other visitor-service businesses) to address their parking needs. There is no exclusive arrangement between the 215 Riverside parking lot with the 2902 Restaurant. And, in fact, in order to ensure that it can operate independently from the 215 Riverside project, the applicant for the 2902 Restaurant has considered other options to address its parking needs, and has entered into a memorandum of understanding to lease 35 parking spaces from the owner of the parking lot located at the southeast corner of Avon Street and Riverside Avenue. (See attached Parking Agreement Memorandum of Understanding.) The applicant for the 2902 Restaurant has publicly stated that it must explore all options for offsite parking in the event 215 Riverside is never constructed, or not completed before the restaurant is ready to open. As the City and its residents are aware, many restaurants in the Mariner's Mile 432 manatt Seimone Jurjis October 2, 2019 Page4 i n i Marina Village r where parking is at a high demand must explore a number of and Lido a s ag areas, p g g p options to address their parking needs to ensure that their patrons' and employees' parking needs can be addressed, and to avoid adversely impacting the surrounding community. The 2902 Restaurant is no different from these other existing restaurants. 5. Ingress and Egress from 215 Riverside One of the other comments we have heard at the public hearing is a concern regarding the ingress and egress from the parking area. Currently there are two driveways: one on Avon and another on Riverside. The proposed project will greatly improve the safety of the ingress and egress along Riverside from the structure. In reality, the existing driveway along Riverside does not meet the site line requirements whereas the proposed driveway will be moved closer to Avon and provide improved visibility and safety. In conclusion, we would request that when the 215 .Riverside project is heard by the Planning Commission that the information in this letter is reflected in the staff report to address the comments we have seen and heard, and to clarify information in the prior staff report regarding the characteristics of the proposed project and use of off-site parking for patrons of the Garden center. Very truly yours, 1, Susan K. I-iori Enclosure Cc via email: Planning Commission James Campbell, Deputy Director Makana Nova, Associate Planner Yolanda Summerhill, Assistant City Attorney Scott Laidlaw 325267417.2 -4 33 September 25,2019 Mr.Gary Jabara Manager The Garden M2,LLC Mariner's Center M2 LLC 660 Newport Center Drive,Ste.200 Newport Beach,CA 92660 Re: Parking Agreement Memorandum of Understanding Dear Mr,Jabara: This letter shall serve as a Memorandum of Understanding("MOU")between Mariners Mile Company, LP("Mariners Mile Co.")on the one hand,and The Garden M2, LLC and Mariner's Center M2, LLC (collectively,"The Garden")on the other hand, for The Garden's use of parking spaces located on that certain parcel known as APN 0,19-121-24 (the"Mariners Mile Lot"), which is owned and operated by Mariner's Mile Co. For good and valuable consideration,which has been negotiated by the parties,The Garden shall be entitled to a license for thirty-five(35)parking spaces(the"Licensed Spaces")at the Mariners Mile Lot for use as overflow parking for patrons and employees of The Garden's tenants. The Garden is permitted to use the Licensed Spaces seven(7)days per week,three hundred sixty-five(365)days per year. The terms of this MOU shall be effective immediately upon receipt. Please indicate your acceptance of the terms of this MOU by signing the Acknowledgement provided below. Best Regards, Ackunwlet eme The Garde ---ctie Ned McCune By;_(� _ I General Manager Name:' Mariners Mile Co. Title: �f�f�_ Date: 4 31f From: Lee,Amanda Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 7:56 AM To: Nova, Makana Subject: FW: 215 Riverside Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged From: Bruce Choate<bruceachoate@email.com> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 2:47 PM To: Planning Commissioners<PlanninaCommissioners@newportbeachca.aov> Cc:Avery, Brad <baverv@newportbeachca.eov> Subject: 215 Riverside Dear Chair Koetting and Commissioners, I currently reside at 2924 Cliff Drive, and have been a resident of Newport Beach for almost 40 years. My wife Kathe and I raised both of our sons in Newport Beach, and they now reside here with their families. After living in Corona del Mar and on Lido, my wife and I chose to build our dream retirement home in Newport Heights, largely because of its views and charm as a quiet, "old school" Newport Beach community. Our home value and quality of life is now being jeopardized by the proposed roof top restaurant in the Garden Plaza on PCH. It is our understanding that the restaurant operator has applied for late night hours on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday until 1:00am. So this means we would be forced to keep our windows closed on beautiful summer nights because of the noise, and our drapes drawn because of the lights. And we expect our street to resemble a parking lot due to all of the traffic. In essence, we are being asked to subsidize this new restaurant by giving up our right to quiet enjoyment and experiencing a significant diminution in the value of our home. And in return for what? We are struggling to see the fairness and equity in this. It is our understanding that the developer of Garden Plaza and the 215 Riverside building is attempting to obtain approval for both projects independently. This is both deceitful and disingenuous. Clearly the parking structure at 215 Riverside is being developed to accommodate the parking shortage at Garden Plaza and the proposed restaurant. We strongly believe they should be treated as one project and are respectfully asking the planning commission to do so in the approval process. Otherwise the City will give up any leverage in negotiations with the developer concerning mitigation requirements for noise, view corridor intrusion and light pollution caused by the restaurant. Those of us who are fortunate enough to live in Newport Beach do not want it to become another Marina Del Rey or Huntington Beach, and we trust the planning commission to share and protect this vision. I believe it was Oliver Wendell Holmes who once stated: "your right to swing your arm ends where my nose begins". We believe the developer's right to develop his project ends where it impacts the quality of lives in our wonderful neighborhood. Thank you for your service and consideration. -4S5 Sincerely, 'B,mcoC A. ahoat6 Office: (949) 673-0559 Cell: (310) 344-2016 bruceachoateC gmail.com 2924 Cliff Drive Newport Beach, CA 92663 430 DECEIVED 6y COMMUNITY City of Newport Beach Planning Commission DEVELOPMENT 100 Civic Drive SEP 2 7 2019 Newport Beach, CA 92660 CITY OF September 24, 2019 y pOFIT BSN Dear City of Newport Beach Planning Commission, I am writing to you regarding the proposed rooftop parking structure located at 215 Riverside. I have lived on Ocean View Avenue in the Newport Heights area for a very long time, and never before has the city's Planning Commission allowed an open rooftop commercial parking structure adjacent to residential properties.We fought against commercial open-air parking structures at the Jaguar car dealership at 3000 West Coast Highway and Mariner's Pointe Retail Center at 100 West Coast Highway, along with AutoNation and St. Andrew's Presbyterian Church, both which were denied. The residents of Newport Heights appreciate the Planning Commission historically protecting the boundaries of these dissimilar uses next to one another. The way that you have protected our residential properties in the past was to require commercial parking structures to be enclosed in order to mitigate the potential to generate noise, such as car alarms, car homs, car audio systems, people talking, vehicle pass-by, engine idling, as well as,illumination from vehicle headlights. I watched the August 22nd Planning Commission meeting on my television and heard the architect say that they could raise the proposed office building and spread it over a covered parking structure below and actually increase the parking spaces to fifty spaces. I don't believe his argument for designing an open commercial parking structure with a"better three-dimensional look and feel"would serve the surrounding neighbors rather than creating an enclosed parking structure, which would definitely help to buffer any negative affects to the quality of life for nearby residents and must be an important priority when considering commercial development projects adjacent to residential zoned properties. In closing, I must ask why would the applicant for the parking structure at 215 Riverside Avenue not be held to the same standards as other prior applicants were held to in past similar conditional use permit requests? Sincerely, 43� From: Lee,Amanda Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 7:45 AM To: Nova, Makana Subject: FW: Garden's Roof top dining/parking structure Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged -----Original Message----- From: Carrie Slayback<carrieslayback@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, September 26, 2019 8:12 PM To: Planning Commissioners<PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov> Subject: Garden's Roof top dining/parking structure Dear Planning Commissioners, Please conduct an on site evaluation of The Garden's parking striation and rooftop dining. Please require flags put up so residents know how much park and home views might be affected. Views from Cliff Drive Park,a designated view site, have been altered forever by buildings on PCH. None of them have ever been fully occupied. Please consider carefully the height of this proposal. Please look at traffic, especially ingress and egress as Riverside is the chosen route for bikes to/from school and for bikes and strollers/junior Lifeguards to/from the beach. Please forward to me and to our Newport Heights Association the original designation of Cliff Drive as a view corridor. I do not know the formal designation. I know this was identified in past council and homeowner discussions. Best, Carrie Luger Slayback 949 646-5902 438 Nova, Makana From: Marjaneh Afkhami <megtarc@gmail.com> Sent: September 19, 2019 4:53 PM To: Planning Commissioners; Campbell,Jim; Nova, Makana Subject: Fwd: 215 Riverside Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged We wish to make sure the City of Newport Beach and the planning commission is aware of our concerns about the pending development on 215 Riverside, Newport Beach, CA 92663. We have listed our concern based on the Summary of the project provided by the city: Our concerns are: • The approval process for the development • Getting Input from immediate homeowners regarding the approval process. • Traffic, noise effects being created by this development • The applicant also has an application into the city for a rooftop restaurant/bar which seats 300 + people located at 2902 West Coast Highway [the long building directly behind C'est Si Bon], which NEEDS the parking structure for its parking requirements! • Why is the city allowing the applicant to file two separate applications for the above-mentioned project as well as the 2902 W. Coast Hwy project, The applicant does NOT want to tie the two projects together even though as many of the Planning Commissioners recommended at the 8/22/19 Planning Commission Meeting that the applicant do so because the two projects seem reliant on each other or are at least interconnected. • The City Attorney would not allow the Planning Commission to discuss ANYTHING regarding the restaurant application because it is not complete. Why is the City staff is still recommending the project? • The applicant wants his request for a CUP to be tied to an 'office structure' rather than a restaurant because they have totally different requirements, this should not be allowed, since they go hand in hand. t 4 s9 • In the past, the NB Planning Commission has either denied commercial parking structures next to residentially zoned properties [St. Andrew's Presbyterian Church, AutoNation on Coast Hwy], or required developments on West Coast Highway such as the Jaguar/Sterling BMW car dealership AND Mariner's Point at the corner of Dover and West Coast Hwy to enclose their parking structures to mitigate noise and light issues from adjacent residential properties. • We do not want to set a 'precedent' of allowing an open rooftop commercial parking structure to be built adjacent to residential properties, and not protect the residents from the negative impacts [noise, light, traffic, etc.]. • Historically, residents' quality of life has been protected by the Planning Commission by requiring applicants to build an enclosed parking structure. • Therefore, the Planning Commission should stipulate that Conditional Use Permit No. UP2019-003 require the applicant to enclose his parking structure just as it has done so in the past in order to create a buffer and protect residentially zoned properties from the negative effects of an adjacent commercial parking structure. • We all know now that this Open-Air rooftop parking structure will not just be a 'day use' parking structure for an office building, but also a 'late evening' parking structure used by a very large restaurant with bar customers that would greatly impact the quality of life for those residential property owners adjacent to the commercial property! Summary [From NB Planning Staffl: A coastal development permit (CDP) to demolish an existing restaurant/office building and associated surface parking lot and to construct a new 47-space, two level parking structure and a 2,830 square-foot office building. A conditional use permit (CUP) is required to authorize construction of the parking structure adjacent to the residentially zoned property. A modification permit is required for 12 tandem parking spaces on the first and second floor levels of the structure. The project includes hardscape, drainage, and landscape improvements. The proposed development complies with all applicable development standards including height, setbacks, and floor area limits. 2 4--'f-D The project is designed to provide surplus off-site parking for "The Garden" shopping center located directly south of the project site. Approval of off-site parking use and any other uses which require parking in the structure will require the processing of a separate conditional use permit and coastal development permit. Please send emails to the Planning Commission - planningcommissioners cr newportbeachca.gov And copy staff - icampbellna.newportbeachca.gov, m nova(a)newportbeachca.gov Kayvon and Marjaneh Goodarzy Cordially, Kayvon Goodarzy (714) 305-9522 -Cell KMongka g nail.com Marjaneh Afkhami -Principal MEGT ARCHITERRA Planning I Urban Design I Landscape Architecture Cell: 714.813.8134 1 Fax: 213.348.2258 445 Santa Ana Avenue I Newport Beach,CA 92663 CA3953 3 CENTERSTONE -- O M M U N I Ti ES WEST °°f, 0 s . �F�iF<pL1'�T September 18, 2019 Sep MFNr 1,9 . �f e019 u oTr City of Newport Beach Planning Commission of Civic Center o 100 Civic Center Drive Ar BEACH Newport Beach, CA 92660 Dear Chairman Koetting and Members of the Planning Commission, My name is Hal Woods. I reside at 2919 Cliff Drive. For the past 30 years, I have raised my children, built my business, and made my home in Newport Beach. I am proud to live here, and the Newport Beach community will always be a rewarding and integral part of my life. I am writing to address the proposed office building, parking structure, and roof top parking at 215 Riverside Drive, as well as the roof top restaurant/bar proposed at the Garden Restaurant. Although I recognize that progress and development are invaluable and inevitable, the foregoing proposed projects will create a severe hardship for those of us who live directly adjacent. These hardships-- including excessive noise, air pollution, light pollution, and extended hours of operation-- will adversely affect my quality of life. As you ought to agree, roof top parking is simply not compatible with residential homes directly above. Ultimately, the proposals for development of 215 Riverside Drive and the Garden Restaurant will interfere with the quiet use and enjoyment of nearby properties, including my own, in a way that is unconscionable and unacceptable. Recently, I had the opportunity to meet the architect, Councilman Avery,and former Councilwoman Daigle regarding the proposed projects. At that time, I was informed that the 215 Riverside Drive property was going to be developed into a 2,800 square foot office building with standard operating hours between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Neither the Council members nor the architect made any mention of a roof top parking structure. Although the architect mentioned that the roof top would look different from others in the vicinity, there was no mention whatsoever of using that parking structure as a roof top parking lot and/or valet service for the new restaurant going in facing Pacific Coast Highway. I feel that the details of this proposed project were blatantly misrepresented to me. Moving forward, I would greatly appreciate a heightened degree of transparency regarding this entire project. I am a real estate developer by trade. Of course, I understand that change and progress are vital and necessary. Nevertheless, I cannot fathom why development projects such as those proposed for the 215 Riverside Drive property and the Garden Restaurant would even be considered by the esteemed members of the Planning Commission. The proposed projects will negatively impact countless neighboring residents in countless ways. Adjacent property owners will be 3500•B W. lake Center Drive, Santa Ana, California 92704 • (714) 437--0800 • Fax: (714) 437-0830 442 Page 2 saddled with the adverse effects of the projects every day, from the very early hours of the morning and into the evening. In addition, I anticipate that the projects will diminish the value of my property and those around me-- a factor that must be considered if in fact this project is approved. As a longtime Newport Beach resident, I sincerely appreciate that you represent my interests. You provide residents like me with a voice to be heard on issues like this, which 1 consider of the highest importance. I support your staff s proposal for a continuance on these hearing items to the October 3, 2019, hearing. I will be in attendance. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectf Ily zil n A . Harold G. Woods, Jr. A.I.A. President Home Address: 2919 Cliff Drive,Newport Beach, CA 92663 Cell Number: 714-200-4915 3500-B W. Lake Center Drive ♦ Santa Ana, California 92704 ♦ (714) 437-0800 ♦ Fax (714) 43}�Of-N Nova, Makana From: Lee, Amanda Sent: September 19, 2019 8:52 AM To: Nova, Makana Subject: FW: Riverside Drive Development - GARDEN PROJECT Attachments: NB Letter.docx Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged From: Hal Woods<hal@centerstone.com> Sent:Thursday, September 19, 2019 8:51 AM To: Planning Commissioners<PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov> Cc: Peggy Palmer<pvpalmer@icloud.com>; Stefanie M. Sitzer<ssitzer@sitzerlawgroup.com>;Jack Staub <jstaub@criticalio.com>; Coralee Newman <cora@govsol.com>; Dan Boyd <dboyd3@me.com>; Ernest V Castro-CCI <evcmanagement@centerstone.com>; Sandra Ayres<ssayres@me.com>;Jill Ayres<jsayres@aol.com>;Jed Robinson <newportheightsassoc@gmai I.com> Subject: Riverside Drive Development- GARDEN PROJECT To Esteemed Members of the Planning Commission, Please see the attached letter in response to the Garden Project Restaurant, roof top bar, and associated parking rooftop parking structure. Respectfully, Harold Woods AIA President Centerstone Community West 2919 Cliff Drive Newport Beach, CA 92663 714-200-4915 t September 18, 2019 City of Newport Beach Planning Commission Civic Center 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Dear Chairman Koetting and Members of the Planning Commission, My name is Hal Woods. I reside at 2919 Cliff Drive. For the past 30 years, I have raised my children,built my business, and made my home in Newport Beach. I am proud to live here, and the Newport Beach community will always be a rewarding and integral part of my life. I am writing to address the proposed office building,parking structure, and roof top parking at 215 Riverside Drive, as well as the roof top restaurant/bar proposed at the Garden Restaurant. Although I recognize that progress and development are invaluable and inevitable, the foregoing proposed projects will create a severe hardship for those of us who live directly adjacent. These hardships-- including excessive noise, air pollution, light pollution, and extended hours of operation-- will adversely affect my quality of life. As you ought to agree, roof top parking is simply not compatible with residential homes directly above. Ultimately, the proposals for development of 215 Riverside Drive and the Garden Restaurant will interfere with the quiet use and enjoyment of nearby properties, including my own, in a way that is unconscionable and unacceptable. Recently, I had the opportunity to meet the architect, Councilman Avery, and former Councilwoman Daigle regarding the proposed projects. At that time, I was informed that the 215 Riverside Drive property was going to be developed into a 2,800 square foot office building with standard operating hours between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.Neither the Council members nor the architect made any mention of a roof top parking structure. Although the architect mentioned that the roof top would look different from others in the vicinity,there was no mention whatsoever of using that parking structure as a roof top parking lot and/or valet service for the new restaurant going in facing Pacific Coast Highway. I feel that the details of this proposed project were blatantly misrepresented to me. Moving forward, I would greatly appreciate a heightened degree of transparency regarding this entire project. I am a real estate developer by trade. Of course, I understand that change and progress are vital and necessary. Nevertheless, I cannot fathom why development projects such as those proposed for the 215 Riverside Drive property and the Garden Restaurant would even be considered by the esteemed members of the Planning Commission. The proposed projects will negatively impact countless neighboring residents in countless ways. Adjacent property owners will be 445 Page 2 saddled with the adverse effects of the projects every day, from the very early hours of the morning and into the evening. In addition, I anticipate that the projects will diminish the value of my property and those around me-- a factor that must be considered if in fact this project is approved. As a longtime Newport Beach resident, I sincerely appreciate that you represent my interests. You provide residents like me with a voice to be heard on issues like this, which I consider of the highest importance. I support your staffs proposal for a continuance on these hearing items to the October 3, 2019,hearing. I will be in attendance. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully, Harold G. Woods, Jr. A.I.A. President Home Address: 2919 Cliff Drive,Newport Beach, CA 92663 Cell Number: 714-200-4915 44� CENTERSTONE -- O M M U N I Ti ES WEST °°f, 0 s . �F�iF<pL1'�T September 18, 2019 Sep MFNr 1,9 . �f e019 u oTr City of Newport Beach Planning Commission of Civic Center o 100 Civic Center Drive Ar BEACH Newport Beach, CA 92660 Dear Chairman Koetting and Members of the Planning Commission, My name is Hal Woods. I reside at 2919 Cliff Drive. For the past 30 years, I have raised my children, built my business, and made my home in Newport Beach. I am proud to live here, and the Newport Beach community will always be a rewarding and integral part of my life. I am writing to address the proposed office building, parking structure, and roof top parking at 215 Riverside Drive, as well as the roof top restaurant/bar proposed at the Garden Restaurant. Although I recognize that progress and development are invaluable and inevitable, the foregoing proposed projects will create a severe hardship for those of us who live directly adjacent. These hardships-- including excessive noise, air pollution, light pollution, and extended hours of operation-- will adversely affect my quality of life. As you ought to agree, roof top parking is simply not compatible with residential homes directly above. Ultimately, the proposals for development of 215 Riverside Drive and the Garden Restaurant will interfere with the quiet use and enjoyment of nearby properties, including my own, in a way that is unconscionable and unacceptable. Recently, I had the opportunity to meet the architect, Councilman Avery,and former Councilwoman Daigle regarding the proposed projects. At that time, I was informed that the 215 Riverside Drive property was going to be developed into a 2,800 square foot office building with standard operating hours between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Neither the Council members nor the architect made any mention of a roof top parking structure. Although the architect mentioned that the roof top would look different from others in the vicinity, there was no mention whatsoever of using that parking structure as a roof top parking lot and/or valet service for the new restaurant going in facing Pacific Coast Highway. I feel that the details of this proposed project were blatantly misrepresented to me. Moving forward, I would greatly appreciate a heightened degree of transparency regarding this entire project. I am a real estate developer by trade. Of course, I understand that change and progress are vital and necessary. Nevertheless, I cannot fathom why development projects such as those proposed for the 215 Riverside Drive property and the Garden Restaurant would even be considered by the esteemed members of the Planning Commission. The proposed projects will negatively impact countless neighboring residents in countless ways. Adjacent property owners will be 3500•B W. lake Center Drive, Santa Ana, California 92704 • (714) 437--0800 • Fax: (714) 437-0830 447 Page 2 saddled with the adverse effects of the projects every day, from the very early hours of the morning and into the evening. In addition, I anticipate that the projects will diminish the value of my property and those around me-- a factor that must be considered if in fact this project is approved. As a longtime Newport Beach resident, I sincerely appreciate that you represent my interests. You provide residents like me with a voice to be heard on issues like this, which 1 consider of the highest importance. I support your staff s proposal for a continuance on these hearing items to the October 3, 2019, hearing. I will be in attendance. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectf Ily zil n A . Harold G. Woods, Jr. A.I.A. President Home Address: 2919 Cliff Drive,Newport Beach, CA 92663 Cell Number: 714-200-4915 3500-B W. Lake Center Drive ♦ Santa Ana, California 92704 ♦ (714) 437-0800 ♦ Fax (714) 43#0�115` Nova, Makana From: Lee, Amanda Sent: September 19, 2019 9:49 AM To: Nova, Makana Subject: FW: Riverside Drive Development - GARDEN PROJECT -----Original Message----- From: Dan Boyd <dboyd3@me.com> Sent:Thursday,September 19, 2019 9:46 AM To: Hal Woods<hal@centerstone.com> Cc: Planning Commissioners<PlanningCommissioners@newportbeachca.gov>; Peggy Palmer<pvpalmer@icloud.com>; Stefanie M. Sitzer<ssitzer@sitzerlawgroup.com>;Jack Staub<jstaub@criticalio.com>; Coralee Newman <cora@govsol.com>; Ernest V Castro-CCI <evcmanagement@centerstone.com>; Sandra Ayres<ssayres@me.com>;Jill Ayres<jsayres@aol.com>;Jed Robinson <newportheightsassoc@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Riverside Drive Development-GARDEN PROJECT Great letter. Disturbing to note that in your meeting with C/M Avery and the architect they failed to disclose the roof top component 1 1 will also draft a letter condemning consideration of just part of a proposal rather than the entire scheme 1 1 also remain disappointed with our representation in that projects adjacent to residential must be afforded a higher degree of scrutiny given the impacts. How on earth will valets consider public safety on Riverside with a major sidewalk taking cars thru the center. That along with the noise etc., are impacts our community should never shall absorb as normal Dan Boyd Dan Boyd > On Sep 19, 2019, at 8:50 AM, Hal Woods<hal@centerstone.com>wrote: >To Esteemed Members of the Planning Commission, > Please see the attached letter in response to the Garden Project Restaurant, roof top bar, and associated parking roof top parking structure. > Respectfully, > Harold Woods AIA > President Centerstone Community West > 2919 Cliff Drive > Newport Beach, CA 92663 > 714-200-4915 ><NB Letter.docx> 1 4.4-9 Nova, Makana From: EVC Management Services <evcmanagement@centerstone.com> Sent: September 18, 2019 3:09 PM To: Planning Commissioners Cc: Campbell,Jim; Nova, Makana Subject: PA2019-023-Objection re Garden Office, Parking Structure, and Rooftop Restaurant Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up Flag Status: Flagged Planning Commission City of Newport Beach Re: Proposed Garden Office & Parking Structure at 215 Riverside Avenue, Newport Beach, (PA2019-023) Dear Planning Commission: am a long time resident of Newport Beach and reside on Cliff Drive. My property (2915 Cliff Dr.) backs up to the property line of the contemplated project currently being considered for placement of a parking structure (215 Riverside Ave.) and a rooftop restaurant (2902 W. Coast Highway). These proposed structures would significantly impact my family and me, as well as our neighbors, and the parking structure in particular would be too high and too close to our property lines (some as close as 20 feet). Additionally, the parking structure is being designed to not only serve the new restaurant/bar in the shopping area across the street, but also the rooftop restaurant/bar, thereby significantly increasing patron noise and traffic. There are four homes (including mine)that back up to the subject property, all of which would be impacted by years of construction activity and ultimately permanently by noisy, rowdy patrons of the rooftop bar, as well as an increase in vehicle noise/traffic and evening lighting. Noise from the bar will impact our surrounding neighborhood as well. Not only would we need to contend with the day-to-day annoyance and problems associated with these commercial activities being so close to residences, but our property values will most likely decrease because of the negative impact. We have a peaceful neighborhood overlooking West Coast Highway and the Lido Channel. We look to the Planning Commission to maintain that peaceful enjoyment. There are more than enough restaurants and bars in the area for the public to enjoy. My family and I are very much against the Planning Commission moving forward with approval for any additional parking structure or restaurant within the proposed PA2019-23 or CUP#UP2019-003. We would like to preserve our beautiful residential neighborhood - not impact it with new commercial uses. We concur with our other neighbors who have filed their objections with the Planning Commission. Regards, Ernest V. Castro (949) 375-4190 i 1f SD Ernest V. Castro, President EVC Management Services, Inc. (949) 375-4190 z -451 Nova, Makana From: Sue Leal <sue@specceramics.com> Sent: September 17, 2019 3:24 PM To: Planning Commissioners Cc: jcampbell@newortbeachca.gov; Nova, Makana Subject: Garden Office & Parking Structure @ 215 Riverside Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up Flag Status: Flagged In attending multiple Newport Beach planning meetings, I have heard suggestion about constructing two or more parking structures for restaurant employees working on PCH and for Trolley parking to make parking more accessible for homeowners on residential streets in the area. That is what (I thought)the demolition of 215 Riverside Avenue might be about. But to learn that the proposed parking structure is NOT enclosed and there's an application is in the city for a "300 seat "rooftop" restaurant/bar" behind C'est Si Bon (which would require that new parking structure) is very disturbing. Not only would the "rooftop restaurant/bar disturb the surrounding residents until at least 2:00 in the mornings, but the lights and noise from the rooftop parking of the parking structure is completely unacceptable. How would you feel if you lived in a beautiful ocean view home on Cliff Drive now overlooking an open air parking structure and 300 seat rooftop bar until 2:00am every morning? In the past, the NB Planning Commission has either denied any commercial parking structures next to residentially zoned properties, or they required developments on West Coast Highway to enclose their parking structures to mitigate noise and light issues from adjacent residential properties. Why would you change that now? Planning Commission, please heavily consider the residential community property values and continue to require all buildings to be enclosed to protect us from the negative late hour effects of open air lights and noise. NO to any open rooftop commercial parking or restaurant/bar in residential areas per Conditional Use Permit No. UP2019-003! Susan E. Leal 219 Tustin Avenue Newport Beach, CA 92663 Cell 714-231-4660 sue@specceramics.com t f„ Todd A.Boock Goodwin Procter LLP 6 - O O D - •\,I�`/I •N TBoo k@g od 0 1 South winlaw.com 41st FloorFigueroa Street Los Angeles,CA 90017 goodwinlaw.com +1 213 426 2500 September 9, 2019 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL AND US MAIL Don Krotee Jed. P. Robinson President Newport Heights Improvement Association Newport Heights Improvement Association 530 El Modena Avenue 230 N. Bush Street Newport Beach, CA 92660 Santa Ana, CA 92701 Jed P. Robinson Charles A. Klobe Newport Heights Improvement Association Newport Heights Improvement Association 1205 Florence Avenue, # 304 457 Tustin Avenue Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Siobhan Robinson Secretary Newport Heights Improvement Association 12025 Florence Avenue, # 304 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Re: The Garden Center Dear Newport Heights Improvement Association: I am writing on behalf of concerned Newport Heights residents regarding the Garden Center development project. It has come to our attention that certain individuals, including Jed Robinson and Charles Klobe, have made inaccurate and inappropriate complaints while purporting to act on behalf of area residents as the "Newport Heights Improvement Association." As an initial matter, these individuals are acting beyond the powers set forth in the original Newport Heights Improvement Association ("NHIA") Articles of Incorporation, which describe NHIA as follows: This corporation is a nonprofit public benefit corporation and is not organized for the private gain of any person. It is organized under the Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law for charitable purposes. The specific purpose of this corporation is to improve and to aid in the improvement of libraries and education facilities, civic participation, traffic, parks, community facilities, community activities, education, safety, welfare and other public areas and to advise and assist city and local governments on the issues affecting the quality of life and public safety in -45S G GOODWIN Don Krotee Jed. P. Robinson Charles A. Klobe Siobhan Robinson September 9, 2019 Page 2 the area of Newport Beach, California known as Newport Heights and its adjacent areas. Mr. Robinson and Mr. Klobe are not acting on behalf of the Newport Heights community or for any charitable purpose. They are expressing their own opinions for their own benefit and disingenuously passing them off as being on behalf of the entire community. This is beyond the scope of the NHIA's permitted activities. Moreover, it is completely improper and mendacious for Mr. Robinson, Mr. Klobe and/or anyone else to suggest to the Planning Commission that they are acting on behalf of the general public. If Mr. Robinson and Mr. Klobe have individual and personal views, they should be expressed as such and no more. In addition, Mr. Robinson and Mr. Klobe do not represent the entire community and their suggestion otherwise before the Planning Commission is absolutely false. Their personal views are not representative of the residents of the area, who disagree with their attempt to stop a necessary and important improvement to Newport Beach. Residents of the Newport Heights neighborhood support the 215 Riverside project, are not exclusively part of the NHIA and did not agree be represented by individuals of such questionable credibility. It is reprehensible that Mr. Robinson and Mr. Klobe would engage in these tactics, all to upset the development of an area that greatly needs improvement and has general community support. We hereby demand that Mr. Robinson and Mr. Klobe immediately cease their wildly inappropriate efforts to upset the 215 Riverside Avenue project by suggesting that they are acting on behalf of the community. They are not, and this conduct needs to stop. Mr. Robinson and Mr. Klobe also need to advise the Planning Commission that any views they express are their own or on behalf of identified individuals. Finally, we hereby demand the following materials from the Newport Heights Improvement Association, to be delivered within ten (10) days to this office: • Articles of Incorporation • Identities of all Directors and Officers • Bylaws • Conflict of Interest Code • Copies of 990 tax returns for the past 10 years • Meeting minutes for last 5 years -4.5.4- G GOODWIN Don Krotee Jed. P. Robinson Charles A. Klobe Siobhan Robinson September 9, 2019 Page 3 Thank you for your anticipated and immediate cooperation. Please contact me with any questions or to further discuss this matter. Please note that we expressly reserve and do not waive any and all rights and remedies. Sincerely, odd A. Boock TAB cc: Newport Beach Planning Commission Newport Beach City Attorney Makana Nova, AICP, Associate Planner 455 f„ Todd A.Boock Goodwin Procter LLP 6 - O O D - •\,I�`/I •N TBoo k@g od 0 1 South winlaw.com 41st FloorFigueroa Street Los Angeles,CA 90017 goodwinlaw.com +1 213 426 2500 September 9, 2019 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL AND US MAIL Bill Dunlap Luke Dru Cliff Haven Community Association President 3100 Pullman Avenue, Suite B Cliff Haven Community Association Costa, CA 92626 420 Kings Road Newport Beach, CA 92663 Peggy Palmer Brian E. Brooks Board Member Chief Executive Officer Cliff Haven Community Association Cliff Haven Community Association 114 28th Street 1835 Newport Blvd., +A109-233 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 James Blauer CFO and Secretary Cliff Haven Community Association 418 Pirate Road Newport Beach, CA 92663 Re: 215 Riverside Avenue Project Dear Cliff Haven Community Association: I am writing on behalf of concerned Newport Heights residents regarding the 215 Riverside Avenue development project. It has come to our attention that certain individuals, including Luke Dru and Peggy Palmer, have made inaccurate and inappropriate complaints while purporting to act on behalf of area residents as the "Cliff Haven Community Association." As an initial matter, the Cliff Haven Community Association is a defunct entity that has been suspended by the California Franchise Tax Board and is not registered with the Internal Revenue Service as a community association. It is completely improper and mendacious for Mr. Dru, Ms. Palmer and/or anyone else to suggest to the Planning Commission that they act on behalf of an association that no longer exists. If they have personal views, they should be expressed as such and no more. In addition, Mr. Dru and Ms. Palmer do not represent the entire community and their suggestion otherwise before the Planning Commission is absolutely false. Their personal views are not representative of the residents of the area, who disagree with their attempt to stop a necessary and important improvement to Newport Beach. Residents of the Cliff Haven neighborhood support the 215 450 G GOODWIN Bill Dunlap Luke Dru Peggy Palmer Brian E. Brooks James Blauer September 9, 2019 Page 2 Riverside project, are not part of this defunct association and did not agree be represented by individuals of such questionable credibility. It is reprehensible that Mr. Dru and Ms. Palmer would engage in these tactics, all to upset the development of an area that greatly needs improvement and has general community support. We hereby demand that Mr. Dru and Ms. Palmer immediately cease their wildly inappropriate efforts to upset the 215 Riverside Avenue project by suggesting that they are acting on behalf of the community. They are not, and this conduct needs to stop. Mr. Dru and Ms. Palmer also need to advise the Planning Commission that any views they express are their own or on behalf of identified individuals. Finally, we hereby demand the following materials from the Cliff Haven Community Association, to be delivered within ten (10) days to this office: • Articles of Incorporation • Identities of all Directors and Officers • Bylaws • Conflict of Interest Code • Copies of 990 tax returns for the past 10 years • Meeting minutes for last 5 years Thank you for your anticipated and immediate cooperation. Please contact me with any questions or to further discuss this matter. Please note that we expressly reserve and do not waive any and all rights and remedies. Sincerely, Todd A. Boock TAB cc: Newport Beach Planning Commission Newport Beach City Attorney Makana Nova, AICP, Associate Planner .4.,7 From: Peggy Palmer<pvpalmer@icloud.com> Sent: September 04, 2019 2:41 PM To: Nova, Makana; Ramirez, Gregg Cc: James Carlson; Stefanie M. Sitzer; Jed Robinson; Siobhan Robinson; Carol Dru; Charles Klobe; Luke Dru Subject: Garden Project Meeting Makana and Greg, Thank you for taking time out of your busy schedule to discuss the Garden Project that includes the office /parking area, as well as, the restaurant portion of the development with the members of the Newport Heights Improvement Association and the Cliff Haven Community Association. The applicant, Mr. Gary Jabara has created such a beautiful plaza and his contribution to our community should be commended; however, moving forward, we have an issue with the applicant only presenting one portion of the project, (office / open roof-top parking structure), and not presenting the entire project, (restaurant with an open roof- top deck), as a whole and its cumulative impacts. The community should have an opportunity to fully comprehend both of these projects, as they are obviously an intregal part of one another and presenting them together would provide full transparency of the potential impacts to the residents. Once again, we thank you and if you should have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact any one of our board members. Peggy V. Palmer 452 Cliff Haven Board Member (949) 887-2471 I Interesting case on CEQA as it applies to protecting aesthetic views and piecemealing. Consider the following: 1. The staff report on handwritten page 7, electronic 5 says: "The project is intended to support off-site parking for future restaurants within The Garden shopping center located south of the project site across Avon Street. 2. Marketing Brochure 3. Chair wanted to see the Masterplan 4. Assistant City Attorney states that they could not discuss the restaurant project. 5. Commissioner Klieman's comment: "The garage does not need the restaurant; the restaurant needs the garage". 6. Potentially blocking public views from public parks, (essentially two view corridors). Aesthetic Argument: https://Pacificviewcenter.com/2015/03/13/cega-and-view-rights/ 4�D Pacific View Rights Resource Center California Viely Rights Information CEQA and View Rights Posted on March 13.2015 By Keith Tanierand)ustin Bcano Another possible weapon for arsenal for view rights claims is the California EnvironmentalQualtrryAct(CEQA). Ina nutshel I, the CEQA law provides that if public and private development project may create a significant environmental impact,then an Environmental Impact Report(EIR)must be prepared,analyzing the potential impacts and possible mitigation alternatives. The CEQA definition of"environment"is very broad, and includes "the physical conditions which exist within the area which will be affected by a proposed project,including land,air,water,minerals,flora, fauna, noise, objects of historic or aesthetic significance." Various California court decisions have considered whether both public and private view rights should be addressed by EIRs for various type of projects. For instance, in Ocean View Estates Homeowners Association,Inc. v.Montecito Water District(2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 396,plaintiff-homeowners used CEQA to object to a Water District's plan to build a four-acre aluminum cover for a Reservoir on the grounds that the change of view would be a significant negative aesthetic impact. The Plaintiffs'view of the reservoir would change from looking"like a very large swimming pool trying to pass as a lake" ("'the sight of clear blue water in a densely vegetated area with diverse topographic relief and an overall green framework from landscaping,provides a striking and unique visual feature, albeit ... artificial"') to a pitched aluminum cover,which over time would oxidize to a dull gray,extended over four acres, 15 feet tall. The court rejected the water district"common law right to a private view"argument,starting the under CEQA the District is not"relieved from considering the impact of its project on such views." The court also rejected the argument that the mere fact that the project only affected a few private views did not mean as a matter of law that the project impact was not significant. However,the court did accept plaintiffs'argument that the aluminum cover could cause a significant negative aesthetic impact on both public and private views. In support of that argument,plaintiffs showed that neighboring property owners, members of plaintiff homeowner's association, and even the county planning and development department expressed concerns about the aesthetic impact of the project. Moreover,plaintiffs presented photographic evidence that the proposed aluminum cover would be visible from public hiking trails and surrounding private properties. In the end,the court held that plaintiffs had provided substantial evidence to support the argument that the project may have a significant negative aesthetic impact.Thus,defendant was forced to prepare a full EIR analyzing the potential impacts. 401 City's general plan,redevelopment plan,local coastal program,and zoning ordinances protected public views,but not private views.The court agreed,and held that the City's decision not to protect private views was not an abuse of discretion that warranted reversal of the certification of the EIR. Under CEQA and Mira Mar Mobile, a reviewing agency has broad discretion in certifying EIRs,and a court will only overrule where there is an abuse of discretion.This means that the EIR does not have to require the best,or even a more reasonable, course of action."[The Court's)role is to determine whether the challenged EIR is sufficient as an information document,not whether its ultimate conclusions are correct.... We may not set aside an agency's approval of an EIR on the ground that an opposite conclusion would have been equally or more reasonable."'Mira Mar Mobile, supra, 119 Cal.App.4th 477,at 486 [Internal citations omitted]. "As long as the EIR makes a complete and good faith effort at full disclosure, and its conclusions are supported by substantial evidence,its conclusions will not be overturned by a court". County ofAmador v. El Dorado County Water Agency(1999)76 Cal.AppAth 931,954. Thus, in Mira Mar Mobile,the EIR concluded that protection of private views was not envisioned by any of the City's policies;therefore,impact on private views was not a significant environmental impact that required changes to the project. The bottom line is that CEQA can be a good weapon,but like all weapons,the attorney using needs to be trained and know what he is doing. Please email us any comments. Share this: Ly Tvdtlul 191 Faceboak a Like Be the first to like Ws. Related ,\, ti:G(!I,t!1 Ctlllli'I VI'A 111-1 AL(Ai ITED VI1'6V RIGI l rS PROVIUC)RY'l l-R.'MARQUE I:M(7r,LS'ff'h Its:W9fl!!sr.tk ine,Cplilbl'nia Snureuw CUurl re"i,!w ar�, `� +,�•+�! The Court of Appeal just Rutted the Wurquez - Knolls CC&RS. Eisen V.T;lvangarian-filed June 20.2019.Second District.Div.Seven. 1'iemRi};hrsand luversc Condemn;llion Vier:Rip,hts anul hwersu f.uudenm;ni,m full text click here.Paragraph 11 or Marquez Knolls CC&Rs provides:"No fences This entry was posted in Local r aws&Ordinances and tagged CfDA.Bookmark the o rye mn�link. Pacific View Rights Resource Center Bing at wnrdPreSS.enr6 T�� Good day Mr. Chairman and members of the Planning Commission. My name is Charles Klobe. I am a resident of Newport Heights and a board member of the Newport Heights Improvement Association. Today I am speaking for the board. Others here tonight will ask you to delay this project for more review. I am asking you to deny it in its entirety. Here's why. Drawing your attention to the top of handwritten page 7, electronic 5 of the staff report which says: "The project is intended to support off-site parking for future restaurants within The Garden shopping center located south of the project site across Avon Street. A separate conditional use permit (CUP) is requested as part of a proposed restaurant at 2902 West Coast Highway for off-site parking and to establish a parking management plan for the shopping center including valet parking for the proposed structure". This will be the basis for a CEQA challenge as this is a clear violation. If there is a nexus or even a probable connection between this proposal and one in the future that is contemplated, then Staff needs to review BOTH in totality. This means impacts that the City says are "non-existent" under the current proposal may very well surface under the future CUP. It is my opinion that it is a very weak conclusion that no impacts occur under either traffic, noise or light. I can't imagine why the City would not be concerned with additional traffic crossing over the existing sidewalk at Riverside. How many times do kids, adults, electric bikes and skateboards scream down that sidewalk or bike lane, and the retaining wall serves a total blindside. The cars exiting onto Riverside late at night when this garage serves a restaurant across the street must be addressed. You are going to add more cars to a parcel that only requires 12 spaces, yet also add 35 more spaces to an area that is already at risk? Under Traffic: No traffic study is required. Yes, the traffic count may not be supported with the 2,800 square foot building but what happens when this parking is used for "off- site" parking from other uses such as the stated future restaurant? An analysis should at least contemplate in/out movements given other uses from the retail and restaurants that clearly generate more ingress/egress that just 2,800 square feet during working hours Monday through Friday. And also, noise and light. Again, these impacts have not been considered by piecemealing this proposal. Anyone who has been here awhile remembers how this owner treated existing tenants when he bought the property. Successful local businesses were forced out. There are tenants in the subject building with existing leases that the owner is not addressing. 4 03 The owner clearly knows that he CANNOT put in a restaurant across the street unless he can provide more parking. So, he is piecemealing this proposal and he could care less about the 2,800 square feet of office as it's the parking that is needed! Also, the proposed tenant for the office space is another of the same owners' businesses. On another note the adjacent riparian areas and stream of water are absolutely jurisdictional and the development of this site should be required to file a formal notification with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife to ensure that CDFW also concurs that there are no impacts from the proposed development. The site does not drain into this area however it is directly adjacent to the development and the CDFWS could at minimum require specific on-site protection to protect their stream. Please deny this project and require it to be submitted correctly with the entire intended project. Thank you for your service. 404 :tiff Haven Community Association *111�et PO Box 1332 Newport Beach, CA 92659 August 22, 2019 Dear Planning Commissioners, On behalf of the Cliff Haven Community Association, I am addressing the following concerns with regards to the proposed Garden office and parking structure project to be located at 215 Riverside Drive in the City of Newport Beach. We are concerned about the impact of increased traffic on Cliff drive, and its impact on the residents in Cliff Haven. At this time, we are requesting a continuance to review both the office and parking structure and the proposed roof-top restaurant and their cumulative impacts. The parking structure is a catalyst to the restaurant. This is defined by CEQA as "piecemealing" or "segmenting" a project. The project must be reviewed together as both proposed activities are an integral part of the same project. In order to maintain public integrity, we are asking for a continuance to allow the community and those concerned residents to view the project in its entirety. Only showing a portion of the project is referred to as "chopping-up" a project and could be perceived as turning a "blind-eye" to a reasonable foreseeable impact of a "whole" action. The conditions of approval for the office and parking structure appear to be vague and we do not support the project moving forward without more transparency with regard to the proposed restaurant, valet parking, hours of operation, employee parking, lighting and the impacts to the surrounding community. In addition, there was an issue with the City's notification process, as they did not follow the appropriate protocol for noticing the Newport Heights Improvement Association and they did not take into consideration the blank radius of both parks along Cliff Drive. The resident at 2919 Cliff Drive has had their attorney send a letter to the City that they were not noticed. The new owner of 2907 Cliff Drive was not noted and according to realtor John Cain, Principal Broker of Pacific Sotheby's International Realty, this project was not disclosed in escrow to the new buyer. The escrow closed on July 29, 2019. The owners have not moved into the property. In closing, we are asking for a continuance and for the opportunity to review all components of the project (the office Building, parking structure and the roof-top restaurant) as a whole. Sincerely, Luke Dru — President Cliff Haven Community Association "Protecting Our Community& Quality of Life Since 1954 " From: Jed Robinson <newportheightsassoc@gmail.com> Sent: August 21, 2019 11:29 AM To: Planning Commissioners Cc: Jurjis, Seimone; Nova, Makana; Campbell,Jim Subject: August 22, 2019 Agenda Item no. 3 Newport Heights Improvement Association P.O. Box 2823 Newport Beach, CA 92659 newportheightsassockgmail.com City of Newport Beach Newport Beach Planning Commission 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 planninecommissioners(a,newportbeachca.gov August 21, 2019 Re: The Garden Office and Parking Structure (PA2019-023) @ 215 Riverside Avenue Dear Newport Beach Planning Commission, The Newport Heights Improvement Association [NHIA]just learned about agenda item no. 3 for this Thursday's Planning Commission meeting regarding the proposed development located at 215 Riverside Avenue, which is located within the area NHIA represents. NHIA was never given notice of this proposed development despite many attempts with the City of Newport Beach to change and update the association's contact information. Further, it is the understanding of NHIA that multiple homeowners within 300 feet of the proposed development did not receive notice of the hearing, despite assertions in the Planning Commission Staff Report to the contrary. NHIA therefore requests that the Planning Commission continue this matter until the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting on Thursday, September 5, 2019, so that NHIA, owners, and residential occupants have time to review the applicant's request for this coastal development permit, conditional use permit, and modification permit. We appreciate your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, 400 Jed Robinson President Newport Heights Improvement Association newportheightsassoc(apmail.com cc: siuriisnnewportbeachca.gov mnova(a�newportbeachca.gov i campbel l(a,newportbeachca.goy .40 From: dgriffith@law1975.com Sent: August 16, 2019 11:42 AM To: Nova, Makana Subject: FW: Project Fine No. PA2019-023 215 Riverside Ave Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Dear Ms. Nova, As we will be unable to attend next week's public hearing, I am submitting this email to you on my behalf and that of my wife, Diane,as our being the owners and nearby residents of 223 Ocean View Ave., Newport Beach, CA, and ask that it be accepted for consideration by the Planning Commission. Having previously met with the project architect and reviewed renderings of the proposed redevelopment we fully support this project. It is our hope that the vision, capital and entrepreneurial zeal that has led to the redevelopment of the adjoining"Garden" property, and which is evident in the pending project, will spark a broader redevelopment of the remainder of the Mariner's Mile locale. The project proposed for 215 Riverside will greatly enhance this area and should be approved. The only concern, a very practical one, which we would wish to note that applies to all nearby redevelopment is assuring that reasonable steps will be taken by code enforcement to assure that limits on the hours of construction are strictly adhered to. Similarly, and ignorant of what may be existing code and regulatory limitations, the hours for commercial trash pick-up must be limited so that the rumbling of the trucks and the loud booming from the dumping of the metallic trash containers does not begin before 7:00 am. Currently the same routinely occurs as early as 6:00 am and during the redevelopment of the Garden property, construction debris was routinely and loudly hauled away as early as 6:00 am. Finally, while not related to the instant project, but which is an unavoidable consequence of the commercial success of the Mariner's Mile corridor,the streets of Ocean View Avenue and Tustin Avenue (between Cliff and Avon Street) are currently choked with parked vehicles, primarily owned by employees of the nearby businesses and to a lesser extent by patrons of charter services not wishing to make use of the nearby municipal pay lot. I am certain that no member of the Commission or Council who resided upon either of those streets would long tolerate this abuse of what is intended and should be only a residential parking area. While it is posted for 2 hour parking during the day, most every evening as the restaurant workers arrive,these two streets become an employee parking lot, with the associated noise when all of those employees return late in the evening after work. Further, it makes it nearly impossible for homeowners to have parking space for guests, particularly on weekends. Other communities have solved this problem by having embraced and consistently enforced regulatory schemes limiting such areas for the parking of residents and their guests. Please note that the current enforcement is less than consistent, all but non-existent on weekends, and typically results in ticketing only of the cars of the occasional tradesman called to make repairs during weekday daylight hours within the homes situated upon these two streets. Again,we fully support the pending project and look forward to a broader and ongoing enhancement of the Mariner's Mile area, but note that the same will only result in more employees looking for nearby parking. Another parking issue we would wish for you to be aware of arises from the current use of the parking lot situated behind the 2700 W. Coast Highway property by chartered commercial buses, which sit idling for hours waiting for the return of patrons enjoying the boat charter services situated across the Coast Highway typically for sunset 402 cruises. Depending upon the event,the exhaust and noise from these busses continues late into the evening, particularly on weekends. As such, wholly independent of the processing of the 215 Riverside Ave. project(which we note will provide its own parking facilities),we urge the Commission to address and resolve the foregoing parking problems in a sensible manner that will preserve and promote the value and enjoyment of the adjoining residences. We thank you for considering these comments and again urge you to approve the project as conceived for the development of 215 Riverside. Very truly yours, Dwight and Diane Griffith Law offices of Dwight I Griffith 180 Newport Center Drive, Ste. 220 Newport Beach, CA 92660 949-662-6556 dqriffith@tawl975.com Any tax advice contained in the body of this e-mail (and any attachments thereto)was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions. Privileged And Confidential Communication.This electronic transmission, and any documents attached hereto, (a)are protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act(18 USC SS 2510-2521), (b) may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information,and(c)are for the sole use of the intended recipient named above. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify the sender and delete the electronic message. Any disclosure, copying, distribution,or use of the contents of the information received in error is strictly prohibited. 2Z3 ceww Vi-- tij July 21,2019 ICI Oljp `r ( B L\c4{"J l// To: City of Newport Beach � 1 support the proposed redevelopment of 215 Riverside Avenue. The project will replace the existing building with a much newer,smaller and better designed building and attached parking. This will be an attractive addition to the area and I support approval of the project. t' //Y �n July 21,2019 d To: City of Newport Beach I support the proposed redevelopment of 215 Riverside Avenue. The project will replace the existing building with a much newer,smaller and better designed building and attached parking. This will be an attractive addition to the area and I support approval of the project. 7„ it4U L, /l�IJ�i��ro�� fin(�l9 �iireltvnrc' z July 21,2019 To: City of Newport Beach I support the proposed redevelopment of 215 Riverside Avenue. The project will replace the existing building with a much newer, smaller and better designed building and attached parking. This will be an attractive addition to the area and I support approval of the project. TIAA AAuOL--TfLv 472 July 21,2019 To: City of Newport Beach 1 support the proposed redevelopment of 215 Riverside Avenue. The project will replace the existing building with a much newer,smaller and better designed building and attached parking. This will be an attractive addition to the area and I support approval of the project. FALL- K'ORk-le- �u+nq--� cvg - �� From: Ruben Munoz <rmdzyn@gmail.com> Sent: April 14, 2019 2:46 PM To: Nova, Makana Subject: PA2019-023 PARKING STRUCTURE CDP 215 Riverside Ave. Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up Flag Status: Flagged Makana, A client of mine is a resident immediately adjacent to this property (2919 Cliff Drive) and was not notified of any development or demolition for the above and below referenced property on Riverside Avenue. If there is any other information you can provide to my client it would be much appreciated. More specifically, my client is concerned about the overall height and massing of the new construction. He seems to recall having a deed restriction placed on the Riverside property limiting its ultimate height. While we search the content of said deed on our end, can you please let us know what information you can provide since my client claims to have never received any notice regarding the CUP. Thank you, Ruben Munoz 714.686.2067 474 PA2019-023 PARKING STRUCTURE CDP Council District 2 CD2019-003 - Coastal Development Perm 215 RIVERSIDE AVE UP2019-003 - Use Permit Description: CUP AND CDP TO ALLOW SITE DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF 3,030 SQ-FT OF OFFICE AND 49 PARKING SPACE STRUCTURE Contact: M. Nova- 949-644-3249 Status: APPLIED Applied: 2/8/2019 Follow-up Rev: Approved: Final: Effective: Expired: Denied: Pending: Date Withdrawn: Voided: Date Activity- Status 02/08/2019 Application- SUBMITTED 02/12/2019 Admin Setup - 47,5 From: Matthew Agren <magren@agrenlaw.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 3:46 PM To: Nova, Makana Subject: Commercial Tenant with Long Term Lease in Building Demolition Permit Sought - PA2019-023 Attachments: 20160711 - Lease - 215 Riverside #101.pdf I am sending this email on behalf of my client Doctor Steven Vensand who occupies a suite, #101, pursuant to a long term lease in the building that is sought to be demolished per the above referenced application for a permit. The building is located at 215 Riverside Ave in the city of Newport Beach. Attached is a copy of that lease which includes a lease term to July 31, 2021 and includes two 5 year options to extend the term of the lease to 2031 which Dr. Vensand intends to exercise. I am able to provide you with copies of the cashed security deposit check, canceled rent payment checks, and other documents that affirm the existence of this lease by the current and former landlord. Please let me know if you would like any of these additional documents. Dr. Vensand objects to the issuance of any permit to demolish the building as it would interfere with his leasehold interest in the property. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information. 470 Matthew Agren Attorney at Law Agren Law Firm, PC 2600 Michelson Dr. STE 770 Irvine, CA 92612 (949) 752-8999 (949) 752-8175 fax 477 I Interesting case on CEQA as it applies to protecting aesthetic views and piecemealing. Consider the following: 1. The staff report on handwritten page 7, electronic 5 says: "The project is intended to support off-site parking for future restaurants within The Garden shopping center located south of the project site across Avon Street. 2. Marketing Brochure 3. Chair wanted to see the Masterplan 4. Assistant City Attorney states that they could not discuss the restaurant project. 5. Commissioner Klieman's comment: "The garage does not need the restaurant; the restaurant needs the garage". 6. Potentially blocking public views from public parks, (essentially two view corridors). Aesthetic Argument: https://Pacificviewcenter.com/2015/03/13/cega-and-view-rights/ 478 Pacific View Rights Resource Center California Viely Rights Information CEQA and View Rights Posted on March 13.2015 By Keith Tanierand)ustin Bcano Another possible weapon for arsenal for view rights claims is the California EnvironmentalQualtrryAct(CEQA). Ina nutshel I, the CEQA law provides that if public and private development project may create a significant environmental impact,then an Environmental Impact Report(EIR)must be prepared,analyzing the potential impacts and possible mitigation alternatives. The CEQA definition of"environment"is very broad, and includes "the physical conditions which exist within the area which will be affected by a proposed project,including land,air,water,minerals,flora, fauna, noise, objects of historic or aesthetic significance." Various California court decisions have considered whether both public and private view rights should be addressed by EIRs for various type of projects. For instance, in Ocean View Estates Homeowners Association,Inc. v.Montecito Water District(2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 396,plaintiff-homeowners used CEQA to object to a Water District's plan to build a four-acre aluminum cover for a Reservoir on the grounds that the change of view would be a significant negative aesthetic impact. The Plaintiffs'view of the reservoir would change from looking"like a very large swimming pool trying to pass as a lake" ("'the sight of clear blue water in a densely vegetated area with diverse topographic relief and an overall green framework from landscaping,provides a striking and unique visual feature, albeit ... artificial"') to a pitched aluminum cover,which over time would oxidize to a dull gray,extended over four acres, 15 feet tall. The court rejected the water district"common law right to a private view"argument,starting the under CEQA the District is not"relieved from considering the impact of its project on such views." The court also rejected the argument that the mere fact that the project only affected a few private views did not mean as a matter of law that the project impact was not significant. However,the court did accept plaintiffs'argument that the aluminum cover could cause a significant negative aesthetic impact on both public and private views. In support of that argument,plaintiffs showed that neighboring property owners, members of plaintiff homeowner's association, and even the county planning and development department expressed concerns about the aesthetic impact of the project. Moreover,plaintiffs presented photographic evidence that the proposed aluminum cover would be visible from public hiking trails and surrounding private properties. In the end,the court held that plaintiffs had provided substantial evidence to support the argument that the project may have a significant negative aesthetic impact.Thus,defendant was forced to prepare a full EIR analyzing the potential impacts. ��q City's general plan,redevelopment plan,local coastal program,and zoning ordinances protected public views,but not private views.The court agreed,and held that the City's decision not to protect private views was not an abuse of discretion that warranted reversal of the certification of the EIR. Under CEQA and Mira Mar Mobile, a reviewing agency has broad discretion in certifying EIRs,and a court will only overrule where there is an abuse of discretion.This means that the EIR does not have to require the best,or even a more reasonable, course of action."[The Court's)role is to determine whether the challenged EIR is sufficient as an information document,not whether its ultimate conclusions are correct.... We may not set aside an agency's approval of an EIR on the ground that an opposite conclusion would have been equally or more reasonable."'Mira Mar Mobile, supra, 119 Cal.App.4th 477,at 486 [Internal citations omitted]. "As long as the EIR makes a complete and good faith effort at full disclosure, and its conclusions are supported by substantial evidence,its conclusions will not be overturned by a court". County ofAmador v. El Dorado County Water Agency(1999)76 Cal.AppAth 931,954. Thus, in Mira Mar Mobile,the EIR concluded that protection of private views was not envisioned by any of the City's policies;therefore,impact on private views was not a significant environmental impact that required changes to the project. The bottom line is that CEQA can be a good weapon,but like all weapons,the attorney using needs to be trained and know what he is doing. Please email us any comments. Share this: Ly Tvdtlul 191 Faceboak a Like Be the first to like Ws. Related ,\, ti:G(!I,t!1 Ctlllli'I VI'A 111-1 AL(Ai ITED VI1'6V RIGI l rS PROVIUC)RY'l l-R.'MARQUEE I:M(7r,LS'ff'h Its:W9fl!!sr.tk ine,Cplilbl'nia Snureuw CUurl re"i,!w ar�, `� +,�•+�! The Court of Appeal just Rutted the Wurquez - Knolls CC&RS. Eisen V.T;lvangarian-filed June 20.2019.Second District.Div.Seven. 1'iemRi};hrsand luversc Condemn;llion Vier:Rip,hts anul hwersu f.uudenm;ni,m full text click here.Paragraph 11 or Marquez Knolls CC&Rs provides:"No fences This entry was posted in Local r aws&Ordinances and tagged CfDA.Bookmark the o rye mn�link. Pacific View Rights Resource Center Bing at wnrdPreSS.enr6 T�� Good day Mr. Chairman and members of the Planning Commission. My name is Charles Klobe. I am a resident of Newport Heights and a board member of the Newport Heights Improvement Association. Today I am speaking for the board. Others here tonight will ask you to delay this project for more review. I am asking you to deny it in its entirety. Here's why. Drawing your attention to the top of handwritten page 7, electronic 5 of the staff report which says: "The project is intended to support off-site parking for future restaurants within The Garden shopping center located south of the project site across Avon Street. A separate conditional use permit (CUP) is requested as part of a proposed restaurant at 2902 West Coast Highway for off-site parking and to establish a parking management plan for the shopping center including valet parking for the proposed structure". This will be the basis for a CEQA challenge as this is a clear violation. If there is a nexus or even a probable connection between this proposal and one in the future that is contemplated, then Staff needs to review BOTH in totality. This means impacts that the City says are "non-existent" under the current proposal may very well surface under the future CUP. It is my opinion that it is a very weak conclusion that no impacts occur under either traffic, noise or light. I can't imagine why the City would not be concerned with additional traffic crossing over the existing sidewalk at Riverside. How many times do kids, adults, electric bikes and skateboards scream down that sidewalk or bike lane, and the retaining wall serves a total blindside. The cars exiting onto Riverside late at night when this garage serves a restaurant across the street must be addressed. You are going to add more cars to a parcel that only requires 12 spaces, yet also add 35 more spaces to an area that is already at risk? Under Traffic: No traffic study is required. Yes, the traffic count may not be supported with the 2,800 square foot building but what happens when this parking is used for "off- site" parking from other uses such as the stated future restaurant? An analysis should at least contemplate in/out movements given other uses from the retail and restaurants that clearly generate more ingress/egress that just 2,800 square feet during working hours Monday through Friday. And also, noise and light. Again, these impacts have not been considered by piecemealing this proposal. Anyone who has been here awhile remembers how this owner treated existing tenants when he bought the property. Successful local businesses were forced out. There are tenants in the subject building with existing leases that the owner is not addressing. 421 The owner clearly knows that he CANNOT put in a restaurant across the street unless he can provide more parking. So, he is piecemealing this proposal and he could care less about the 2,800 square feet of office as it's the parking that is needed! Also, the proposed tenant for the office space is another of the same owners' businesses. On another note the adjacent riparian areas and stream of water are absolutely jurisdictional and the development of this site should be required to file a formal notification with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife to ensure that CDFW also concurs that there are no impacts from the proposed development. The site does not drain into this area however it is directly adjacent to the development and the CDFWS could at minimum require specific on-site protection to protect their stream. Please deny this project and require it to be submitted correctly with the entire intended project. Thank you for your service. 422 :tiff Haven Community Association *111�et PO Box 1332 Newport Beach, CA 92659 August 22, 2019 Dear Planning Commissioners, On behalf of the Cliff Haven Community Association, I am addressing the following concerns with regards to the proposed Garden office and parking structure project to be located at 215 Riverside Drive in the City of Newport Beach. We are concerned about the impact of increased traffic on Cliff drive, and its impact on the residents in Cliff Haven. At this time, we are requesting a continuance to review both the office and parking structure and the proposed roof-top restaurant and their cumulative impacts. The parking structure is a catalyst to the restaurant. This is defined by CEQA as "piecemealing" or "segmenting" a project. The project must be reviewed together as both proposed activities are an integral part of the same project. In order to maintain public integrity, we are asking for a continuance to allow the community and those concerned residents to view the project in its entirety. Only showing a portion of the project is referred to as "chopping-up" a project and could be perceived as turning a "blind-eye" to a reasonable foreseeable impact of a "whole" action. The conditions of approval for the office and parking structure appear to be vague and we do not support the project moving forward without more transparency with regard to the proposed restaurant, valet parking, hours of operation, employee parking, lighting and the impacts to the surrounding community. In addition, there was an issue with the City's notification process, as they did not follow the appropriate protocol for noticing the Newport Heights Improvement Association and they did not take into consideration the blank radius of both parks along Cliff Drive. The resident at 2919 Cliff Drive has had their attorney send a letter to the City that they were not noticed. The new owner of 2907 Cliff Drive was not noted and according to realtor John Cain, Principal Broker of Pacific Sotheby's International Realty, this project was not disclosed in escrow to the new buyer. The escrow closed on July 29, 2019. The owners have not moved into the property. In closing, we are asking for a continuance and for the opportunity to review all components of the project (the office Building, parking structure and the roof-top restaurant) as a whole. Sincerely, Luke Dru — President Cliff Haven Community Association "Protecting Our Community& Quality of Life Since 1954 " �g3 From: Jed Robinson <newportheightsassoc@gmail.com> Sent: August 21, 2019 11:29 AM To: Planning Commissioners Cc: Jurjis, Seimone; Nova, Makana; Campbell,Jim Subject: August 22, 2019 Agenda Item no. 3 Newport Heights Improvement Association P.O. Box 2823 Newport Beach, CA 92659 newportheightsassockgmail.com City of Newport Beach Newport Beach Planning Commission 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 planninecommissioners(a,newportbeachca.gov August 21, 2019 Re: The Garden Office and Parking Structure (PA2019-023) @ 215 Riverside Avenue Dear Newport Beach Planning Commission, The Newport Heights Improvement Association [NHIA]just learned about agenda item no. 3 for this Thursday's Planning Commission meeting regarding the proposed development located at 215 Riverside Avenue, which is located within the area NHIA represents. NHIA was never given notice of this proposed development despite many attempts with the City of Newport Beach to change and update the association's contact information. Further, it is the understanding of NHIA that multiple homeowners within 300 feet of the proposed development did not receive notice of the hearing, despite assertions in the Planning Commission Staff Report to the contrary. NHIA therefore requests that the Planning Commission continue this matter until the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting on Thursday, September 5, 2019, so that NHIA, owners, and residential occupants have time to review the applicant's request for this coastal development permit, conditional use permit, and modification permit. We appreciate your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, 424 Jed Robinson President Newport Heights Improvement Association newportheightsassoc(apmail.com cc: siuriisnnewportbeachca.gov mnova(a�newportbeachca.gov i campbel l(a,newportbeachca.goy 4215 From: dgriffith@law1975.com Sent: August 16, 2019 11:42 AM To: Nova, Makana Subject: FW: Project Fine No. PA2019-023 215 Riverside Ave Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Dear Ms. Nova, As we will be unable to attend next week's public hearing, I am submitting this email to you on my behalf and that of my wife, Diane,as our being the owners and nearby residents of 223 Ocean View Ave., Newport Beach, CA, and ask that it be accepted for consideration by the Planning Commission. Having previously met with the project architect and reviewed renderings of the proposed redevelopment we fully support this project. It is our hope that the vision, capital and entrepreneurial zeal that has led to the redevelopment of the adjoining"Garden" property, and which is evident in the pending project, will spark a broader redevelopment of the remainder of the Mariner's Mile locale. The project proposed for 215 Riverside will greatly enhance this area and should be approved. The only concern, a very practical one, which we would wish to note that applies to all nearby redevelopment is assuring that reasonable steps will be taken by code enforcement to assure that limits on the hours of construction are strictly adhered to. Similarly, and ignorant of what may be existing code and regulatory limitations, the hours for commercial trash pick-up must be limited so that the rumbling of the trucks and the loud booming from the dumping of the metallic trash containers does not begin before 7:00 am. Currently the same routinely occurs as early as 6:00 am and during the redevelopment of the Garden property, construction debris was routinely and loudly hauled away as early as 6:00 am. Finally, while not related to the instant project, but which is an unavoidable consequence of the commercial success of the Mariner's Mile corridor,the streets of Ocean View Avenue and Tustin Avenue (between Cliff and Avon Street) are currently choked with parked vehicles, primarily owned by employees of the nearby businesses and to a lesser extent by patrons of charter services not wishing to make use of the nearby municipal pay lot. I am certain that no member of the Commission or Council who resided upon either of those streets would long tolerate this abuse of what is intended and should be only a residential parking area. While it is posted for 2 hour parking during the day, most every evening as the restaurant workers arrive,these two streets become an employee parking lot, with the associated noise when all of those employees return late in the evening after work. Further, it makes it nearly impossible for homeowners to have parking space for guests, particularly on weekends. Other communities have solved this problem by having embraced and consistently enforced regulatory schemes limiting such areas for the parking of residents and their guests. Please note that the current enforcement is less than consistent, all but non-existent on weekends, and typically results in ticketing only of the cars of the occasional tradesman called to make repairs during weekday daylight hours within the homes situated upon these two streets. Again,we fully support the pending project and look forward to a broader and ongoing enhancement of the Mariner's Mile area, but note that the same will only result in more employees looking for nearby parking. Another parking issue we would wish for you to be aware of arises from the current use of the parking lot situated behind the 2700 W. Coast Highway property by chartered commercial buses, which sit idling for hours waiting for the return of patrons enjoying the boat charter services situated across the Coast Highway typically for sunset 420 cruises. Depending upon the event,the exhaust and noise from these busses continues late into the evening, particularly on weekends. As such, wholly independent of the processing of the 215 Riverside Ave. project(which we note will provide its own parking facilities),we urge the Commission to address and resolve the foregoing parking problems in a sensible manner that will preserve and promote the value and enjoyment of the adjoining residences. We thank you for considering these comments and again urge you to approve the project as conceived for the development of 215 Riverside. Very truly yours, Dwight and Diane Griffith Law offices of Dwight I Griffith 180 Newport Center Drive, Ste. 220 Newport Beach, CA 92660 949-662-6556 dqriffith@tawl975.com Any tax advice contained in the body of this e-mail (and any attachments thereto)was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions. Privileged And Confidential Communication.This electronic transmission, and any documents attached hereto, (a)are protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act(18 USC SS 2510-2521), (b) may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information,and(c)are for the sole use of the intended recipient named above. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify the sender and delete the electronic message. Any disclosure, copying, distribution,or use of the contents of the information received in error is strictly prohibited. 427 2Z3 ceww Vi-- tij July 21,2019 ICI Oljp `r ( B L\c4{"J l// To: City of Newport Beach � 1 support the proposed redevelopment of 215 Riverside Avenue. The project will replace the existing building with a much newer,smaller and better designed building and attached parking. This will be an attractive addition to the area and I support approval of the project. �n July 21,2019 d To: City of Newport Beach I support the proposed redevelopment of 215 Riverside Avenue. The project will replace the existing building with a much newer,smaller and better designed building and attached parking. This will be an attractive addition to the area and I support approval of the project. '�{ g9 7„ it4U L, /l�IJ�i��ro�� fin(�l9 �iireltvnrc' z July 21,2019 To: City of Newport Beach I support the proposed redevelopment of 215 Riverside Avenue. The project will replace the existing building with a much newer, smaller and better designed building and attached parking. This will be an attractive addition to the area and I support approval of the project. TIAA AAuOL--TfLv �90 July 21,2019 To: City of Newport Beach 1 support the proposed redevelopment of 215 Riverside Avenue. The project will replace the existing building with a much newer,smaller and better designed building and attached parking. This will be an attractive addition to the area and I support approval of the project. FALL- K'ORk-le- �u+nq--� cvg - �� �92 From: Ruben Munoz <rmdzyn@gmail.com> Sent: April 14, 2019 2:46 PM To: Nova, Makana Subject: PA2019-023 PARKING STRUCTURE CDP 215 Riverside Ave. Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up Flag Status: Flagged Makana, A client of mine is a resident immediately adjacent to this property (2919 Cliff Drive) and was not notified of any development or demolition for the above and below referenced property on Riverside Avenue. If there is any other information you can provide to my client it would be much appreciated. More specifically, my client is concerned about the overall height and massing of the new construction. He seems to recall having a deed restriction placed on the Riverside property limiting its ultimate height. While we search the content of said deed on our end, can you please let us know what information you can provide since my client claims to have never received any notice regarding the CUP. Thank you, Ruben Munoz 714.686.2067 492 PA2019-023 PARKING STRUCTURE CDP Council District 2 CD2019-003 - Coastal Development Perm 215 RIVERSIDE AVE UP2019-003 - Use Permit Description: CUP AND CDP TO ALLOW SITE DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF 3,030 SQ-FT OF OFFICE AND 49 PARKING SPACE STRUCTURE Contact: M. Nova- 949-644-3249 Status: APPLIED Applied: 2/8/2019 Follow-up Rev: Approved: Final: Effective: Expired: Denied: Pending: Date Withdrawn: Voided: Date Activity- Status 02/08/2019 Application- SUBMITTED 02/12/2019 Admin Setup - 49s From: Matthew Agren <magren@agrenlaw.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 3:46 PM To: Nova, Makana Subject: Commercial Tenant with Long Term Lease in Building Demolition Permit Sought - PA2019-023 Attachments: 20160711 - Lease - 215 Riverside #101.pdf I am sending this email on behalf of my client Doctor Steven Vensand who occupies a suite, #101, pursuant to a long term lease in the building that is sought to be demolished per the above referenced application for a permit. The building is located at 215 Riverside Ave in the city of Newport Beach. Attached is a copy of that lease which includes a lease term to July 31, 2021 and includes two 5 year options to extend the term of the lease to 2031 which Dr. Vensand intends to exercise. I am able to provide you with copies of the cashed security deposit check, canceled rent payment checks, and other documents that affirm the existence of this lease by the current and former landlord. Please let me know if you would like any of these additional documents. Dr. Vensand objects to the issuance of any permit to demolish the building as it would interfere with his leasehold interest in the property. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information. 494 Matthew Agren Attorney at Law Agren Law Firm, PC 2600 Michelson Dr. STE 770 Irvine, CA 92612 (949) 752-8999 (949) 752-8175 fax 495 V� QP �P Attachment No. PC 7 Project Plans 497 V� QP �P �9g PA2019-023 Attachment No. PC 7 - Project Plans maa—. ��^ �a«w� ,.a.m. ^,"°°'d. .m ,�., ��.•w�e.aWoe�a��„ M-MOM „m........,..,� .`m n - LI ..w 6 Vicklify Mop 3 Proled Dafp d Sheet Inez 3 LegOnd 1 Contlifions of Approval LS�Jq ' i Rr�� — uwuw ChLirzBCtS Nf 1�1 ✓V � m i i i J y i 4 e6R�Ib.:An mn - R� ^, WnWn WMOA YIIW9 elan ww a u ry nmi�____________�_�i1L11111JJJJJ''''ppppp qc I wzo� er+lni ry i 0 I wvm � m _ vu i I I ® .„....., (Even 51 __ -- _— __ _ _JI � % n ® -- -_-_ - 1 ManLevel Floor Plan , 74 _T9J V PA2019-023 Attachment No. PC 7 - Project Plans FLMIlASTIC'SA CAP ® Grteimiaa ' FLINTLASTIC' SA d1un'•0 —..�M.mxr—. uw.Aexww xaonnu munex eaoven.a ....r.�.........�r....—..rr... L_SEJrlhit,cts �OY'.1 CBf18MfIbB4 Ftinllastk'SA Meet tM Family �rsxwmere — none rmw.mwee..�.Wxv r MNeaM b xbnlnxbv.elw w•^"—••••'—• r r.p.w.n.e..p.iwr AssttletlCS dIXI u ssent forget the took 8 ,t CBaSOr16I RxnmeMetl Syshm A.n A lmb� mm�orrr e.mmriaem.uanr.mra+vv -_- xxFe Butl4 CA YMee . A_100a �oO PA2019-023 Attachment No. PC 7 - Project Plans No'" Slope 51.10-19.02=32,M' 32.08'/112.42'-285%Slope>5% O R . J x ../ R.- I� LSFIhi tects. ;,% All—Jll \ ► I o- I yj✓ a i � I •awn.e..w.CA vseea .J >w xuyx� C I n a I Q _--_—� i _-- _—_— — ——— I / A_701 1 B11oin9HeI8M1lLimltCNcplofion �DA PA2019-023 Attachment No. PC 7 - Project Plans 2 Demo Notes 3 legend \ LS�n�hitects. \� R i:iiereiemi.....e \. R �i.m PG p.sYb.An mx..e..e \ .e.u.4 •A4e W Wen 9utl4 CA Y018 X a ad a„® A_702 1 Demo Ron �O� PA2019-023 Attachment No. PC 7 - Project Plans P I I I I; li I I ' l I I ' r LShitects. ii F F 1 a II I i a i W We119utl4 CA YpllB rv. _— _._—�___. ___—— _—_—_—___- i K- 1 SlghlLlneOlagrpm - ��� S� A_103 503 PA2019-023 Attachment No. PC 7 - Project Plans i � \ R LSFIhi�<t� -21 o o �— _ _ W W.11 lutl4 C1 Y0!! n a n a n�wim A_104 1 F2Aac ssDlo9rhRl PA2019-023 Attachment No. PC 7 - Project Plans WKV ® ° 4 Key Notes 3 Legend $ General Notes LS[ 1 I i .e e� m — — __.__—._ _—_—_._ a__—__ — ---___— _._____. 1 Maln Leval Park�g wd ComFnaslol Hour PWn v �O� PA2019-023 Attachment No. PC 7 - Project Plans EE Ml� -E M q Key Notes 3 Legend $ General Noles LSElhitect= f i =1 .0 �, ¢6 q�sYb Pin � •" — �i w.Ron e..a c•axeee 'i ® r 1 1 it li ! ,Xit 1 A - - / ------ - --------------- -- --{ / M» 1 Upper Level Parking and Commercial Floor Plnn �O PA2019-023 Attachment No. PC 7 - Project Plans w P l .ru.... himects am P Wezi(A,On)Elevation •m=a M gYSYb Pin w.yon e..a c�asses 1 south(Rwemde)9evanon •_-a- °� _W PA2019-023 Attachment No. PC 7 - Project Plans vxt �m � LS��hiRects 4 Easi Bevation �-T=a M gYSYb Pin w.yon s..a c�asses �e�S` A"301 PA2019-023 Attachment No. PC 7 - Project Plans ao 23 a 03 L_ LIhitects +r umuwzoxnrz 3 Section - M gn.Yb/nn IEI M MUM w.mon s..a c�asses 1 Section �-m= z section •-a=� S�. A-400— �O/ PA2019-023 Attachment No. PC 7 - Project Plans r� �, o u Con wdd Area i O LS[ hitect5. R 1 42 s1 2 24s1 - - 3 1123 s1 A 1 zl Tab- 1.332 s1 = 0 2 Second Level Ho.,Are. - Y. n r>axmv I FtlpYereb an c1 aMas 0 0o..dd Area S4 sf 1 Y 15 f O 3 43 sf Tote- 1.412SI A-1 1 Main Level Fb rAre �^ O PA2019-023 Attachment No. PC 7 - Project Plans Existing Uphill Residence i Proposed View Corridor of Parking Existing View Corridor of Parking View from View from Residence Pool Terrace Mature Height of Proposed Trees — — Proposed Landscape Screening ,K\ \ — \\ Existing Building Proposed Building Z_ ' vv v v v v v v ® v I Existing Parking Terraces Parking View-Shed Section Diagram LSOrcf,itects 0 1 5 10 LnIDLAW S[HrILi2 151-^ PA2019-023 Attachment No. PC 7 - Project Plans f View Fom Rverslae Are eu:iing vlaw fmm evers ae nve.y, PropMe[J LS� MtE'GLS. h� j ..poi e..m 2 View from Avon St &isIng Vlew Rom Avon St Piopc��ni .cn arzacv 1 A-? 1 VA.Rom Clip Drive Park MO, View Rom Cfdf Drive Park Prpposetl °F PA2019-023 Attachment No. PC 7 - Project Plans L S�I'chitects { w¢Gp Pin .eon rw.r,ce asses q Vlew From The of Park 9a1rvroy Projear Not VIIINFl 3 View From Park Bench iPmlect Not VlSlblel vmu arum n a i A_3 2 View Ram Edge of Pbh Lowe Pfeo(Project Not Visible) 1 Vlaw Rom Park Blois Landing(Pralect Not Visible) u �13 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH NOTES EASEMENT NOTES'. SCOPE OF WORN P'� ,ha .r-rTr?a v �L1MM. PT ®UY-1lM1I.wM aM .mauw.aw.w,ma T�GeAL L DEVELOPMENT STATISTIC — m�ex.�wami�e. O®O 21 Im W. 6 fd/ � _- .._� m I _ _ 3EA --_---___—___ AVON TREET _—___—_—_—___-- nwe=emx1 nerve e+ou n wun zew.rt wl.ww+ DUAL A�x[Aa G He[ Ti 51- 4 CITY OF NEW ORT BEACH NOTES SCOPE OF VIOPN TOA,,, Pam -'mow,"�'a� F`^o � DEVELOPMENT STATISTICS +wwnwro 21 x. ,� . ... moo.: Iid I 9 n�wrr�ire I n.na,w i 1 , .II lo lw x m EASEMENT NOTES. rm�can n .w,u va C9 '!pp <jJ yy@ AVON STREET _—_—_---_ ®mero.«s�m..a 3 a c2 ^^� •^ TOAL g_.Fl •"�I�mm -�Ar- _ ,o:PP��.�P�P.«.m �® _ m. ® ti�s..,,rm:.-,� �®Oo �J n u rc ui ucn : ® ........ ...... •.—` p,o Fq ® �� O�Oi(LIP�UI m � '— m y'�1: ACIgN�-B y�WL.. A-� .new en msr ®arw rs,u `•:.J •.51E WM1mYl1 YO WTiY3 AYNgI LMIR OETML YFAXXODND BMP REWIflEIAENT3 .. 4 i•vr®nvimnmrme.m NOTE < iq`mr. wwi®e_®�a`rsw sr`is.P'�w m I O, a � I O © as m ri "nw 6 5z it o :J5 .° II Y � - ref r z g PYVI: Cit_CI tis one- V F wm ele PA2019-023 - Pro'ect Plans N TOAL IN ow .77 T I r; J _ Y J ____________- AVONSTREET 10 r aor x�Nore:� •� uc r..r purr Kaw aarav�n.pp.n a� aacernw.iw w�rc�.erw .u.w..iuo.wwaw.�ww.swre.ao® _ _ r1Y2d.blmpC.iWiYq.�p1{ - r 1D-01 all nt Nln P�_o_7 - Prnicro�v 4 P_Ian _ w �. .� NNI I INNI I INNI 10101111111111111111111111 a� / 1 0 _I AVON STREET -_____—__-— 6� I gj SITE •f e CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN LS RIV hlReccs 2LSERSIDEAVE �ienroniaucn.uN=m 1