HomeMy WebLinkAboutIS032_BLOCK 400-MEDICAL EXPANSION (2) 15032
sop
PPP... '--� •• , a . •. +� ►." • • r .: _
• ` /•.., ,ram 4%0409
-310
we
OX
�'+* IA ' .. it I
• • ` • .1 •
le
OL IL
-At
:h
do
' l
4 . �.
• c"� `� � . I �,, •►
^did` ���• - �sr � ,
1
Planning Commission Meeting September 8, 1983
Agenda Item No. 12
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: Traffic Study (Public Hearing)
Request to approve a Traffic Study for an 80,000±
sq.£t. (gross) medical office building in Block 400 of
Newport Center.
LOCATION: Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 34-30 (Resubdivision No.
226) , Parcels 1, 2 and 3 of Parcel Map No. 37-23
(Resubdivision No. 297) and Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No.
91-19 (Resubdivision No. 524) , located at 400 Newport
Center Drive, on the easterly side of Newport Center
Drive, between San Nicolas Drive and San Miguel Drive,
in Newport Center.
ZONE: C-0-H
APPLICANT: Frank Rhoades, Newport Beach
OWNER: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
Application
Frank A. Rhoades, Jr. has requested approval of a Traffic Study to
permit the construction of an ±80,000 sq.ft. medical office building
in Newport Center. Traffic Studies are prepared pursuant to Chapter
15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code ["The Traffic Phasing
Ordinance (TPO) ) and City Policy S-1 ("Administrative Procedures for
Implementing The Traffic Phasing Ordinance") .
Subject Property and Surrounding Land Uses
The proposed 80,000 square foot medical office building is to be
located in Block 400 of Newport Center. Block 400 is bounded by San
Miguel Drive and San Nicolas Drive, and by Newport Center Drive East
and Avocado Avenue. Figure 1 in the attached Traffic Study is a
vicinity map depicting the location of the Block 400 project.
Vehicular access to the site would be from San Miguel Drive and from
San Nicolas Drive. The location of the project and the adjacent
development within Block 400 are illustrated in Figure 2 of the
attached Traffic Study.
— r
T0: Ploning Department - 2 •
In Block 400 there are now three buildings with a total of 271,945
gross square feet of medical office. Approximately 1200 parking
spaces for the three buildings are provided. The gross square footage
for the three buildings is as follows:
Building I - 80,000 '
Building II - 100,497
Building III - 91,448
Total 271,945 gross square feet
Traffic Study
The applicant has requested the Planning Commission's approval of a
Traffic Study for the purposes of issuance of building and grading
permits in conjunction with the construction of the project. The
Traffic study for the proposed development has been prepared in
accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code
("Traffic Phasing Ordinance") and City Policy S-1 ("Administrative
Procedures for implementing the Traffic Phasing Ordinance") . A copy
of the Traffic Study prepared for the City by Basmaciyan-Dacnell, Inc.
is attached.
The following table provides a 1% analysis for those intersections
that the City Traffic Engineer has determined will be affected by the
proposed project based upon its size and location:
y TO: Plating Department - 3
ONE PERCENT ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Project-Related Traffic
Exceeds 1% of 2-1/2 Hr.
Intersection Peak Period
San Joaquin Hills Road at:
San Miguel Drive YES
Santa Rosa Drive/Big Canyon Drive YES
Santa Cruz Drive/Big Canyon Drive YES
Bristol Street st:
s/o Jamboree Road NO
s/o Birch Street NO
s/o Irvine Avenue/Campus Drive NO
n/o Campus Drive NO
n/o Birch Street NO
n/o Jamboree YES
Pacific Coast Highway at:
Orange Avenue NO
Prospect Avenue NO
Balboa Boulevard/Superior Avenue NO
Riverside Avenue NO
Tustin Avenue NO
Dover Drive/Bayshore Drive NO
Bayside Drive YES
Jamboree Road YES
Newport Center Drive YES
Avocado Avenue NO
MacArthur Boulevard YES
Goldenrod Avenue NO
Marguerite Avenue NO
Jamboree Road at:
Santa Barbara Drive NO
San Joaquin Hills Road YES
Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road NO
Bison Avenue NO
Eastbluff Drive North NO
MacArthur Boulevard NO
MacArthur Boulevard at:
San Miguel Drive YES
San Joaquin Hills Road YES
Ford Road YES
Bison Avenue YES
In accordance with the Traffic Phasing Ordinance and City Policy S-1
an I.C.U. analysis was made. THe T.C.U. analysis indicates traffic
volumes will be greater than 0.90 and that further analysis would be
required. The following chart indicgtteq the I.C.U. 's for critical
intersections:
TO: Planning Department - 4
H
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF ICU ANALYSES
Existing + Existing +
Existing + Regional + Regional +
1983 Regional + Committed + Committed +
Existing Committed Proposed Project with
Intersection Condition Condition (a) Project Improvements
ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU IDS
. San Joaquin Hills Road at:
San Miguel Drive 0.3871 A 0.4147 A 0.4275 A (c)
Santa Rosa/Big Canyon 0.4431 A 0.4849 A 0.4949 A (c)
Santa Cruz/Big Canyon 0.3819 A 0.4771 A 0.4802 A (c)
Bristol Street North at:
Jamboree Road 0.7743 C 0.9078 E 0.9107 E 0.6647 B
Coast Highway at:
Dover Drive/Bayshore Drive 0.7092 C 0.8074 D 0.8116 D (c)
Bayside Drive 0.9364 E 0,8644(b) D 0.87O4(b)D (c)
Jamboree Road 0.8013 D 0.9162 E 0.9241 E 0.8562 D
Newport Center Drive 0.6232 B 0.6966 B 0.6982 B (c)
MacArthur Boulevard 0.7490 C 0.8734 D
0.8781 D (c)
Jamboree Road at:
San Joaquin Hills Road 0.6730 B 0.7476 D 0.7476 D (c)
MacArthur Boulevard at:
San Miguel Drive 0.6947 B 0.7685 C 0.7850 C (c)
San Joaquin Hills Road 0.7090 C 0.8201 D 0.8223 D (c)
Ford Road 0,7760 C 0.8728 D 0.8760 D (c)
Bison Avenue 0.7527 C 0.8944. D 0.8959 D (c)
(a) 1986 condition represents existing traffic, regional growth,
and approved developments traffic expected to occur by 1986.
(b) Includes fourth lane westbound required of the Marriott Hotel
project.
(c) No improvement required.
J
4 j TO: PlAing Department - 5 •
Project Related Improvements
Pacific Coast Highway/Jamboree Road
Convert the westbound right-turn-only lane to an optional right-turn
and through traffic lane. This would necessitate the construction of
an additional westbound lane exiting from the intersection. With this
improvement the 1986 ICU would be 0.9562, including traffic to/from
the proposed building.
Bristol Street North/Jamboree Road
The extension of the Corona del Mar Freeway to MacArthur Boulevard
would alter traffic patterns and turning movements, since there would
be an interchange of the Corona del Mar Freeway at Jamboree Road.
Staff Analysis
City Policy S-1 provides that an analysis be done to determine if one
year after completion of the project, or portions of the project for
which the traffic analysis is being performed, the project will
generate one percent or more of the projected traffic volume for each
leg of each impacted intersection during the 2.5 hour peak period.
The policy also provides that when one year after completion of the
project, the project may generate on percent or more of projected
traffic volume on one or more legs of an impacted intersection, then
an I.C.U. analysis will be performed in accordance with S-1. Finally,
the policy provides that when the I.C.U. analysis finds that the
intersections will be operating at acceptable levels the Planning
Commission shall approve the Traffic Study.
The development of an additional medical office building in Block 400
of Newport Center was approved as a portion of GPA 81-2. The approval
was subject to the -applicant meeting several standards, one of which
was the TPO. The applicant has indicated that subsequent to Planning
Commission approval of the Traffic Study, he will begin detailed plans
to meet the remainder of the GPA 81-2 requirements. Additional
environmental documentation is presently being prepared under contract
to the City and the remaining approvals could be accomplished possibly
by the end of this year.
Recommended Action
Staff recommends approval of the Traffic Study with the Findings and
subject to the Conditions indicated in Exhibit "A".
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
JAMES D. H ICKER, Dir tor
By
Frimzxt;
ed Talar cc
Environmental Coordinator
Attachments: Exhibit "A"
Traffic Study
TO: P ning Department - 6 • ;
TRAFFIC STUDY
FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
Findings;
1. That as Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact
of the proposed project on the circulation system in accordance
with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City
Policy S-1.
2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project-generated
traffic will be greater than one percent of the existing traffic
during the 2.5 hour peak period on any leg of the critical
intersections, and will add to an unsatisfactory level of traffic
service at critical intersection which will have and Intersection
Capacity Utilization of greater than .90.
3. That the Traffic Studies suggest several circulation system
improvements which will improve the level of traffic service to
an acceptable level at all critical intersections.
4. That the proposed project, including circulation system
improvements will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory
level of traffic service on any "major", "primary-modified" or
"primary" street.
Conditions
1. That prior ,to the occupancy of the proposed project, the
Circulation System Improvements described on page 15 of the
Traffic Report prepared by BDI and dated August 22, 1983 shall
have been completed (unless subsequent project approvals require
modifications thereto) . The improvements shall be subject to the
approval of the City's Traffic Engineer.
2. That prior to the occupancy of the proposed project, the
Circulation 'Systems Improvements described on page 13 of the
Traffic Report prepared by BDI and, dated August 22, 1983 for
"committed" projects shall have been completed (unless subsequent
project approvals require modification thereto) . The improvement
shall be subject to the approval of the City Traffic Engineer.
or
The applicant may make a cash contribution of not less than
$70,000 to fulfill this requirement if it is determined by the
Public Works Department that there is a reasonable corelation
between the occupancy of the project and the City/State Coast
Highway widening project.
Traffic Study For
BLOCK 400
MEDICAL EXPANSION
Prepared By
BASMACIYAN-DARNELL, INC.
TRAFFIC STUDY
FOR
BLOCK 400 OF NE'WPORT CENTER
MEDICAL OFFICE EXPANSION
IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Prepared for:
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, California 92663
Prepared by:
Basmaciyan-Darnell, Inc.
4262 Campus Drive
. Suite B-1
Newport Beach, California 92660
(714)549-9940
August 22 , 1983
a
\�8 BASIC IYAN-DARNELL, IN
ENGINEERING AND PLANNING
ai Transportation, Traffic, Municipal, Transit
4262 Campus Drive,Suite B-1 Newport Beach,California 92660 (714)549-9940
August 23, 1983
Mr. Fred Talarico
City of Newport Beach
Planning Department
3300' Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, California 92660
Subject: Block 400 Medical Expansion
Dear Mr. Talarico:
Transmitted herewith are two copies of the traffic study prepared
for the subject project. The study has been prepared to permit
the processing of Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO) requirements of
the City.
By separate transmittal a copy of the report has been forwarded
to the City Traffic Engineer.
Please call me if you have any questions or need additional infor-
mation.
Sincerely,
BASMACIYYAN-DARNELL,p INC.
Bill E. Darnell, P.E.
BED/ss
enclosure
cc: Mitch Brown, PBR
3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Project Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
• EXISTING CONDITIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Existing Traffic Volumes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Trip Generation Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
PROJECT-RELATED TRAFFIC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Trip Generation . . . . . . . . . . 5
Trip Distribution and Assignment. . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE (TPO) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Jamboree Road at Bristol Street North . . . . . . . 10
Jamoree Road at Pacific Coast Highway . . . . . . . . . . 14
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . 14
MITIGATION MEASURES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
APPENDICES
Appendix A
2.5 Hour Peak Hour - 1S Analysis Worksheets
Appendix B
ICU Worksheets for 14 Critical Intersections
Appendix C
ICU Worksheets with Mitigation Measures
Jamboree Road at Bristol Street North
Jamboree Road at Pacific Coast Highway
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NO. DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.
1 TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY FOR BLOCK 400 AND
RECOMMENDED TRIP GENERATION CHARACTERISTICS 5
2 ESTIMATED TRIPMAKING TO/FROM PROPOSED PROJECT 6
3 SUMMARY OF 1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS . . . . . 12
4 SUMMARY OF ICU ANALYSES . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE NO. DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.
1 VICINITY MAP. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2 SITE MAP. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3 EXISTING DAILY TRAFFIC. . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4 BLOCK 400 MEDICAL EXPANSION TRIP DISTRIBUTION 7
5 BLOCK 400 MEDICAL EXPANSION PM PEAK HOUR
TRAFFIC VOLUMES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
6 BLOCK 400 MEDICAL EXPANSION 2-1/2 HOUR PM PEAK
PERIOD TRAFFIC VOLUMES. . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
7 CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS LOCATION MAP . . . . 11
I ✓
• . y 1
TRAFFIC STUDY
FOR
BLOCK 400 OF NEWPORT CENTER
MEDICAL OFFICE EXPANSION
IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
INTRODUCTION
The addition of an 80,000 square-foot medical office building in
Block 400 of Newport Center is proposed. This report has been
prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Traffic
Phasing Ordinance (TPO) of the City of Newport Beach. The infor-
mation presented is a supplement to the traffic study contained
in the EIR for General Plan Amendment (GPA) 81 -2.
Project Description
The proposed 80,000 square foot medical office building is to be
located in Block 400 of Newport Center. Block 400 is bounded by
San Miguel Drive and San Nicholas Drive, and by Newport Center
Drive East and Avocado Avenue. Figure 1 is a vicinity map
depicting the location of the Block 400 project. Vehicular
access to the site would be from San Miguel Drive and from San
Nicolas Drive. The location of the project and the adjacent
development within Block 400 are illustrated in Figure 2 .
EXISTING CONDITIONS
In Block 400, the site proposed for development, there are now
three buildings with a total of 271 , 945 gross square feet of
medical office. Approximately 1200 parking spaces for the three
buildings are provided. The gross square footage for the three
buildings is as follows :
Building I - 80,000
Building II - 100, 497
Building III - 91r448
Total 271 ,945 gross square feet
The location of each building and the proposed project is
depicted in Figure 2.
Existing Traffic Volumes
The existing ( 1982) average daily traffic• (ADT) volumes for the
streets in the vicinity of the project are presented in Figure 3.
The source of these traffic volumes is the City of Newport Beach
Traffic Engineering Department. The volume data presented repre-
sent average winter weekday volumes.
1
v
v -
�
i
Ca us Drive
C.
�Oti BIrch Street ;
is
w �& p �e
a to F` x o4
�79.F In
Bristol Street
,c a
of ¢ •
Dsl Mar Avenue Unlverelt o
p09A 9o°c c Drive Oonits Gen
O`t�`` a Upper
1,D t Newport
COSTA MESA p 22nd Street Bay Olson Project Site
N Avenue
ord
EWPORT
e�
tpth Street BEACH a�
• p o
8anJoaqulnNllle Road
i 17th Street w ��
e
:0
o
O v s o 18�th Street CORONA o
9 e = DEL MAR e •
i (A N e ' p e `✓ m Bay$ m
w M w O. y/ >
COAST Oyw+r a Q.
��► s a
o
a �
*ftmz—
alboa Boulovhrd
Pacific Ocean
Avocado Avenue
FIGURE 1
BASMACIYAN DARNELL.INC. VICINITY MAP
a14!Uiwu Dri ,Su LI
w.1«]M.n,uJrN YIiN
1]I1 Ni ria0
San Nicolas Drive
NOT A PART
III
PARKINQ
O
rm+ C
0 PROPOSED BUILDING �
Q i IV 10
3 °
m °
= PARKING
II
San Miguel Drive
FIGURE 2
SITE PLAN
BASMACIYAN•DARNELL, INC.
4262 Campus Drive,Suite 8.1
Newport Beach,California 92660
r� (714)549.9940 3
i
N4
-t 3e �9p
O G Ce us Drive 32
i
,O G C.
ti fin Birch Streettv
;
s
970 �F< 01 '� OG! O �•
i° oG
l� Y 31. O 24 O
26 ec
Brlsto4 Street 32
D
'� e
°( p
Del Mar Avenue 31
42 Q
O 26UntversitY 60 38
oc
090 90°0 f 28 a Drive Bootie Cant
OGt�4/ Upper
43 48
por XXG EX STING DAILY TRAFFIC
COSTA MESA 90 28 say Olson (IN THOUSANDS)
22nd Street Avenue
• 37 or Roa ;
26 EWPORT s cq
lath Street EACH 4e 36 8 •oW
O 20 19
o San Joaquin Hills Road
17th Stre •t 23 Ot 32 O 8 18
16 UY 20 72.2• ;
O a e loth Street CORONA 31 o to •
ep d •o, /9 O o m m 23 69 61 34 1e 24 DEL MAR 8 e
e 0 20 39 • n e 3 46 gaYe 30 o m
W
48 • H � o
C
m 37 OAST �Ohh `o a
31 40 ty a i
0 6 �
16 61
20 Bsibon�8oulevard
soft IC Ocean
Source: City of Newport Beach 22 Avocado Avenue
FIGURE 3
9ASMACIYAN•DARNELL.INC" 1982 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
-imf aTw.fN..,sw.r•.
Nowt Muh,twAwN.YIiW
pb1 fi0.YH0
Trip Generation Studies
The trip generation characteristics of the existing medical
office development in Block 400 were analyzed by collecting de-
tailed data on the existing development. Daily machine counts at
each of the access drives were made as well as manual turning
movement counts during the afternoon peak period between 3:00 and
6 :00 PM. The data collection was performed on June 28, 29 and
30, 1983 (Tuesday thru Thursday) . Based on the traffic counts
and the size of the existing buildings, daily and peak hourly
trip generation rates were computed. These were then utilized
for analyzing the traffic impacts of the proposed project. The
trip generation rates are presented in the following section of
this report.
PROJECT-RELATED TRAFFIC
To estimate what effect the traffic volumes generated by the
Block 400 project would have on the surrounding circulation
system, a three-step process was used. First, the traffic that
will be generated by the project was determined. The generated
trips were then geographically distributed to major trip
attractors in the area surrounding the project. (The trip
attractors include employment centers, commercial centers, resi-
dential areas. ) Finally, the project-related traffic was
assigned to specific roadways .
Trip-Generation
The trip generation rates used in this analysis are based on the
counts and field surveys conducted for the existing buildings in
Block 400. The resulting generation rates were discussed with
the City Traffic Engineer and represent the existing and
projected tripmaking characteristics of the project. Table 1
presents results of the trip generation studies for the project
site.
TABLE 1
TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY FOR BLOCK 400
AND
RECOMMENDED TRIP GENERATION CHARACTERISTICS
Daily : 40 Trip Ends/1 , 000 sq. ft. of gross building area.
Afternoon Peak Hour ( 4: 30-5 :30 PM)
Inbound . 40 trip ends/1 , 000 sq. ft. of gross building area.
Outbound 1 . 90 trip ends/1 , 000 sq. ft. of gross building area.
2-1 /2 Hr. Afternoon Peak Period ( 3 :30-6:00 PM)
Inbound 1 . 60 trip ends/1 ,000 sq. ft. of gross building area.
Outbound 4.00 trip ends/1 , 000 sq. ft. of gross building area.
/� 5
0
Based on the trip generation rates in Table 11 the proposed
development of 80 , 000 square feet of gross medical office space
would generate 3,200 daily vehicle trip ends. During the after-
noon peak hour, 184 trip ends would be generated; during the
afternoon 2-1 /2 hour peak period 448 vehicle trip ends would be
generated. Table 2 is a summary of the estimated tripmaking
to/from the proposed project.
TABLE 2
ESTIMATED TRIPMAKING TO/FROM PROPOSED PROJECT
Land Use 80 , 000 square feet of
Medical Office (Gross
Building Area) .
Daily Vehicle Trip Ends 3, 200
Afternoon Peak Hour Vehicle Trip Ends
Inbound 32
Outbound 152
2-1 /2 Hour Afternoon Peak Period Vehicles
Trip Ends (3 :30-6 : 00 PM)
Inbound 128
Outbound 320
Trip Distribution and Assignment
The trip distribution characteristics of the site were developed
taking into consideration the spatial orientation of possible
origins and destinations, and field reviews of the distribution
characteristics of the existing development on the project site.
The resulting trip distribution pattern is depicted in Figure 4.
The traffic that would be generated by the proposed medical
office development was then assigned to the surrounding street
system in accordance with the distribution pattern shown on
Figure 4 . The resulting project-related 2-1 /2 hour afternoon
peak period and afternoon peak hour traffic volumes are presented
in Figures 5 and 6, respectively.
TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE (TPO)
The City of Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO)
requires the review of potential external traffic impacts on
critical intersections for any office, industrial or commercial
development of 10,000 square feet or more and any residential
development of 10 dwelling units or more. The process requires
.the identification of critical intersections to be examined,
analysis of the impacts of the project on the 2-1 /2 hour after-
noon peak period traffic volumes for critical intersections and,
finally the preparation of Intersection Capacity Utilization
�� 61 .
Nawpott v e%
souls. 6% :r Irvine Avenue %
10% ..i 2% 2% 8%
a%m 2
^ O*G)
Aoz
Dover Drive I mo 0
y w
16% MID
m a
c
14 UP °
0 i Eaarb� Op w m O
°h -0 10% 10% o °
ro s 'mot T R
w o,
K Jamboree 8% O
ro 10% 7% Road 2%
a ? 10%
9� a •c`er pyees'�te Cruz-, ° ecJee�♦ T% 6%
4 �• a i.
Newport i - 8% 2%
s •O o
J t Qs NOaoeQ s+nr4 S O a : 10% 6%
aN iR �R084 S t l0%
aR
`o r co A > 20%
O 7 A
vOC4 "? o m
e o
12% oa n ° 10%
57% 0
20% 40 rt
eoidegr 10% Bou ev �4 m
°d
2%aque 20%
26% ^ Z®
8% 0
O
A i
2% Marnurrlta 1% 1O 8an Duel Drive a °
Avenue t 6%
6%
NNNIK� FIGURE 4
SAWAnYAN DARNELL•INC. BLOCK 400 MEDICAL EXPANSION
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
(A
Boulaxard "� kvine Avenue m N N -
w as a
J
� x r a
xm
m
r-
a sov 0
Dover Drive m
w m 3
w m00 m n
m m rp v
99 p
co m a
o °
o a ss� O In m y m
6 O p
R
Jamboree a
m xm w N Road +w
Zr Cruz
co6°c`er OrJpo asc�s a s a
a ' oca� to
m o a f
CO Newport w a a .p o
1 o v rc�crP 98e�B O a a w to
m N ` 2 J m'
_ o,
ul
Ave
m e
m v#€lfi ,p° Q. a m co
A V V
w m a' w " - m a ocArthur -4
V to �.
GO/donr°d B°p evard w m a
Avoouoca
w m Z�J m °
fl1 co � O
cl) Q ^L
Marp orl a sao Mlpuol Drlve C.
A v to co N
m N NUe w
\BiD\, - FIGURE 5
BLOCK 400 MEDICAL EXPANSION
a,SM"`IYaNa" t«.INC.
PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
�3e1 uaw.wn.,swn a�
He.pw.Ma.0.lw.trM.Yxi6a
plq H9i9.0
1
a --
Newport 1
w + N
8outeyatd ! W s kvina Avenue o o at
W N W W
W
• W N
•
ti
N xM
O x ttl
J _ O Dover olive I Qo to
co y Wmw=Z m 3
to o 0m�00 m v
! ON
m
e
PO=O + �W ? •
Esa 6-4 O"t W m N O
• �y- omcl co
rb/4// 3 >Mm o Q
or h
�• Om
Jamboree O
to V O
co to + m
= W goad N W a
1 �
W N CIAN ,•a� to
a
•CL♦t of/pe g;�t1 Cr+Z ; N ° N eC i• a
Newport r° o y
•
`c can rcec•4 8 n UPn a sq at♦ x O c •o 0 o
O• CJ W a y N i m
GO _ ♦ 4 •
1 W
N w m # w v 8aoArth°r
Goldsnro °o evartl w r Q
AY4�lie co W W ; u
v
to
+ , Z -
a a, 22
O N O
r' 'k♦rp4arlt• !w 8an MIO°aI'prlva CAL
°
Y1aoe m
W
\DI� FIGURE 6
DAWAriY.w°ARNELL.IW. BLOCK 400 MEDICAL EXPANSION
2 & 1/2 HOUR PEAK PERIOD TRAFFIC VOLUMES
x..onsMw:txnwwyid!"
pMs sii riro
( ICU) calculations for each critical intersection that does not
satisfy the TPO 1 % test. Should the ICU .value yield an unsatis-
factory Level of Service (LOS "E" or ICU greater than 0 . 9000 )
then additional analysis and identification of specific mitiga-
tion measures are required.
The proposed Block 400 Medical Office project will initially be
occupied in 1985 with full occupancy by 1986 . The City Traffic
Engineer has identified 32 critical intersections that could be
affected by the proposed project at full occupancy. Table 3 is a
list of the 32 intersections. Figure 7 is an illustration of the
location of the 32 intersections.
The first step in evaluating the intersections is to conduct the
1 % Traffic Volume Analysis. The 1 % Traffic Volume Analysis takes
into consideration existing traffic, regional growth and approved
projects traffic. For those intersections' where, on any approach
leg, project traffic is estimated to be greater than 1 % of the
projected peak 2-1 /2 hour traffic volume, , Intersection Capacity
Utilization Analysis (ICU) is required. The results of the 1 %
analysis identified 14 of the 32 critical intersections where ICU
analyses would be required. No ICU analysis would be required at
the remaining 18 intersections. Table 3 is a summary of the
results of the 1 % traffic volume analyses. Appendix A contains
the worksheets for these analyses.
ICU s were calculated for the fourteen ( 14 ) critical intersec-
tions listed in Table 3 followed by a "yes". The results of the
ICU analyses are summarized in Table 4 and copies of the ICU
worksheets are contained in Appendix B.
A summary of the ICU' s for the 14 critical intersections are
presented in Table 4. ICU' s are presented for existing condi-
tions , expected conditions in 1986 with approved developments and
regional growth traffic, , and finally the resulting ICU' s in 1986
with project- related traffic added.
In •1986 two of the fourteen critical. intersections will have
ICU' s greater than 0. 9000 with the regional growth and approved
developments traffic. The addition of project-related traffic
results in the same two intersections further exceeding an ICU of
0 . 9000. These intersections are Jamboree Road at Bristol Street
North and Jamboree Road at Pacific Coast Highway. Additional
analyses of these two critical intersections has been performed
and is discussed in the following paragraphs.
Jamboree Road at Bristol Street North As indicated in Table 4 ,
the intersection is projected to have an ICU value of 0. 9078 in
1986 without the project and an ICU value of 0. 9107 with the
project. Completion of the extension of the Corona del Mar
Freeway is anticipated by 1986 . This project will modify the
intersection so that the current left turn to reach the freeway
would be a right turn to an on-ramp, and northbound through traf-
fic would not be stopped. If we assume that 15 percent of the
northbound left turn will remain as trips with local destina-
o
9r
O a O s Ca us Drive �
c
� � Birch Street C.
'9i• o�c w oo s
ni GCE 0 4�
V y m pep°
Bristol Street •
b r
• e
'F Qo
y1,D� `G4 Del Mar Avenue Univeretty
0.95 90•a � o Orri• Dori• Gant°
v
OG�Fp • Upper
Newport
COSTA MESA o 22nd Street Bay too"
r Avenue
•LEGEND NEWPORT- ord Roa �C
CRITICAL INTERSECTION lath Street EACH
• - o 0
San Joe n Hills Road
+ l7th Street •
�r 'e O i
O 111 'lath Street O•
i • u � n tnL p > a s CORONA o
o » o 1 0 e o DEL MAR i
9� e eVI
a 90 z
a aIs save
as COAST y�Oy�A a : `
_�f Y c 0 •
o �
•
alboa Boulavard
Pacific Ocean
Avocado Avenue
FIGURE 7
,ASMACn,A„_urNNUIL.INC. CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS LOCATION MAP
♦7�1 GIN 0.w,lu.M1 t•1
NI:/MI Mrh.lilMW 1]IN
nlq lY+)fY -
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF 1 % TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
Project-Related Traffic
Exceeds 1 % of 2-1 /2 Hr.
Intersection Peak Period
San Joaquin Hills Road at:
San Miguel Drive YES
Santa Rosa Drive/Big Canyon Drive YES
Santa Cruz Drive/Big Canyon Drive YES
Bristol Street at:
s/o Jamboree Road NO
s/o Birch Street NO
s/o Irvine Avenue/Campus Drive NO
n/o Campus Drive NO
n/o Birch Street NO
n/o Jamboree Road YES
Pacific Coast Highway at:
Orange Avenue NO
Prospect Avenue NO
Balboa Boulevard/Superior Avenue NO
Riverside Avenue NO
Tustin Avenue NO
Dover Drive/Bayshore Drive NO
Bayside Drive YES
Jamboree Road YES
Newport Center Drive YES
Avocado Avenue NO
MacArthur Boulevard YES
Goldenrod Avenue NO
Marguerite Avenue NO
Jamboree Road at:
Santa Barbara Drive NO
San Joaquin Hills Road YES•
Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road NO
Bison Avenue NO
Eastbluff Drive North NO
MacArthur Boulevard NO
MacArthur Boulevard at:
San Miguel Drive YES
San Joaquin Hills Road YES
Ford Road YES
Bison Avenue YES
�7 12,
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF ICU ANALYSES
Existing + Existing +
Existing + Regional + Regional +
1983 Regional + Committed + Committed +
Existing Committed Proposed Project with
Intersection Condition Condition(a) Project Improvements
ICU LOS ICU Los ICU LOS ICU LOS
San Joaquin Hills Road at:
San Miguel Drive 0.3871 A 0.4147 A 0.4275 A (c)
Santa Rosa/Big Canyon 0. 4431 A 0.4849 A 0.4949 A (c)
Santa Cruz/Big Canyon 0.3819 A 0.4771 A 0.4802 A (c)
Bristol Street North at:
Jamboree Road 0.7743 C 0.9078 E 0.9107 E 0.6647 B
Coast Highway at:
Dover Drive/Bayshore Drive 0.7092 C 0.8074 D 0.8116 D (c)
r Bayside Drive 0.9364 E 0.8644(b) D 0.8704(b) D (c)
Jamboree Road 0.8013 D 0.9162 E 049241 E 0.8562 D
Newport Center Drive 0.6232 B 0.6966 B 0.6982 B (c)
MacArthur Boulevard 0.7490 C 0.8734 D 0.8781 D (c)
Jamboree Road at:
San Joaquin Hills Road 0.6730 B 0.7476 D 0.7476 D (c)
MacArthur Boulevard- at:
San Miguel Drive 0.6947 B 0.7685 C 0.7850 C (c)
San ,Joaquin Hills Road 0.7090 C 0.8201 D 0.8223 D (c)
Ford Road 0.7760 C 0.8728 D 0.87-60 D (c)
Bison Avenue 0.7527 C 0.8944 D 0.8959 D (c)
(a) 1986 condition represents existing traffic, regional growth,
and approved developments traffic expected to occur by 1986.
(b) Includes fourth lane westbound required of the Marriott Hotel
project-
(c) No improvement required.
1 1 • •
tions , an ICU analysis can be completed for this future condi-
tion. This analysis is also presented in Table 4; the value
would be 0 . 6647 with the freeway extension.
Jamboree-Road-at Pacific. Coast Highway. This intersection is
projected to have an ICU value of 0. 9162 without the project and
an ICU of 0. 6647 with the project in 1986. Mitigation of this
project can be accomplished by the conversion of the westbound
right turn lane on Pacific Coast Highway to an optional through
and right turn lane. The resulting ICU with this improvement
would be 0. 8562 in 1986 , including traffic to/from committed
projects and the proposed medical office expansion.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
- The report has been prepared in accordance with the
requirements of the Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO) of the
City of Newport Beach for the construction of a fourth medical
office building in Block 400 of Newport Center. The proposed
building would have 80,000 square feet of gross area. The
three existing buildings have a total of 271 , 945 gross sq. ft.
- Trip generation rates for the existing buildings were
established on the basis of actual traffic counts at the
driveways. For the proposed building, these trip generation
rates are used.
- Daily traffic to/from the proposed building would be 3 , 200
vehicles. In the afternoon peak hour there would be 152 '
outbound and 32 inbound vehicles. During the 2-1 /2 hour
afternoon peak period, there would be 320 outbound and 128
inbound vehicles.
- The City of Newport Beach has identified 32 intersections
where the traffic impacts of the proposed building must be
analyzed. At 14 of the 32 intersections traffic to/from the
proposed building would exceed one percent of the traffic at
the intersection at least on one approach. In accordance with
the stipulations of the TPO, intersection capacity utilization
( ICU) analyses would be required and were performed) at these
14 intersections.
- At two of the 14 intersections the ICU would be in excess of
0. 9000 in 1986 considering existing traffic plus regional
growth, plus traffic to/from committed projects. The addition
of traffic to/from the proposed medical building would further
increase the ICU at these two intersections. The two inter-
sections are Pacific Coast Highway at Jamboree Road and
Bristol Street North at Jamboree Road.
- At Pacific Coast Highway/Jamboree Road the 1986 ICU would be
0 . 9162 without the proposed building and 0 .9241 with the
proposed building. Therefore, improvements to reduce the ICU
to a level below 0 . 9000 would be required.
�9 14 _s
0 •
At Bristol Street North/Jamboree Road the 1986 ICU would be
0. 9078 without the proposed building and 0.9107 with the
proposed building. Therefore, improvements to reduce the ICU
to a level below 0 . 9000 would be required.
Appropriate improvements at the two intersections are
presented in the following section.
MITIGATION MEASURES
- At the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway/Jamboree Road,
convert the westbound right-turn-only lane to an optional
right-turn and through traffic lane. This would of course
necessitate the construction of an additional westbound lane
exiting from the intersection. With this improvement the 1986
ICU would be 0 .8562 , including traffic to/from the proposed
building.
- At the intersection of Bristol Street North/Jamboree Road the
extension of the Corona del Mar Freeway to MacArthur Boulevard
would alter traffic patterns and turning movements, since
there would be an interchange of the Corona del Mar Freeway at
Jamboree Road.
- one right-turn-only lane
- With the Corona del Mar Freeway improvements and expected
shifts in traffic movements the 1986 ICU would be 0.6647 ,
including traffic to/from the proposed project.
15
o�
Appendix A
2.5 Hour Peak Hour - 1% Analysis
Worksheets
Appendix A
- 2.5 Hour Peak Hour - 18 Analysis
Worksheets
cr�
1
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection San Joa uin Hills Rd. San Miguel
(Existing Traffic Volumes base on Average inter Spring g 83)—
-- Peak 2+k Hour Approved ;--'---
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1' of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k�Hour Peak 214 Hour peak 25 Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume yo7
Voiuine
Northbound 655 J� 7�
Southbound 781 -j _
Q� ZCi
Eastbound 1571 1-7151-5 —
iLWestbound 972 (OZ —
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Beak 2h Hour Traffic. Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 2 Hour Traffic
� i Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
P Y
Y 4
I OCK boo MEDICAL, DATE:_ Q
PROJECT:
�� A-1 FORM I
1% Traffic Volume ,Analysis
Intersection San Joaquin Hills Rd. / Santa Rlisa - Big Canyon
(Existing Traffic Volumes base overage inter pring 19
Peek 2h Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1„ of Projected '� Project
Direction Peak 24 Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2� Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ; VOW*
Northbound 1291 (� �j/ (�j: 1 3 i i;i• —
Southbound 294
Eastbound 1258 ZQV 16�rA
' Westbound 945 1q b
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
El Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be -greater than 1% of Projected
J( Peak 21�. Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
i
PROJECT:
ash/ A-2 FORM I
0
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection San Joaquin Hills Rd. / Santa Cruz-Bi g
Canyon
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average . lnter pring 19 83
_
Peak 2k Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1� of Projected I - Project I
Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 2)s Hour Peak 2% Hour Peak 2§ Hour � Peak 2� Hour
Volume Volume volume Volume Volume Volume
Northbound 892 669! 14b)
South bound 5
Eastbound 1738 I OZ, 1110
Wesffiound 1531
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 211 Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 2)1 Hour Traffic Volume., Intersection Capacity Utilization
(- ' (I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
fJI DOL ACL CD -aOd W� DATE: �7I u��3
PROJECT:
o�7 A-3 FORM I
1% Traffic'Volume Analysis
X
Intersection Bristol SLS% Jamboree Rd.
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pang 9 _
Peek 23% Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1n of Projected ( Project
Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 24 Hour Peak 2� Hour
m
Volume Volume Volu Volume Volume Volume
Northbound 5362 t ( rijj (/p 'lj (,j3• Zj
Southbound 1703 `J[7 ?)�9 ZC•e) ZD
Eastbound 5499 1060 L
Westbound (/1
I Y''
tom^ Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
1� Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
❑ 1.Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume, Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
Io� 4C0 �ed t � avvspi ;L o n A TE
PROJECT:
a6 A-41RM I
1
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection Bristol St.5 Birch St.
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pr ng 19 683 T
Peak 2h Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1-- of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 21 Hour Peak 2% Hour Peak 2y Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
Northbound 358 _
southbound 991
Eastbound 7225
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
�u Peak 211 Hour Traffic Volume — —
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
El Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume.' Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
. u
ULU- 4DO Medical &Xo(Aoion AT SIZz�a3
PROJECT:
a�7 A-5 FORM 1
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection Bristol St.S9 Irvine•Ave. — Campus Dr.
(Existing Traffic Volumes 6as�e on verage tinte—r7Spring 199--W
Peak 2), Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1; of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 21, Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2� Hour
Volume Volume Volume Vol Whe Volume = Volume
Northbound 1980 Z Z��'��
I sorthbound 2559 c) 1 2 3Ioc' 31
Eastbound 8577 114V6 11r) �L
Westbound
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
❑. Peak 211 Hour Traffic Volume.. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I4.U.) Analysis is required.
NIL ACD kLM Oaff loh DA7F; a1 77,163
PROJECT:
ag A-6 FORM I
• � ' •
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection Bristol St. U. ' Campus Dr.
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pring 9 ! 3
Peak 21, Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected I Project
Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 21, Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 21s Hour Peak 2y Hour
Volume volume Volume Volu//mm�e, Volume Volu'e
Northbound 2215
rWaestWund
uthbound 3857tbound ��D r�i2
s ____ Qr //9151 7�aj 1951
_I'5I 106WC
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
[] Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume., Intersection Capacity Utilization
,.,.Peak
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
P��ock. � 1`�P�tC0.� C�I/11V1�i101� BATE• �l2?��g3
PROJECT:
oZ 9
A-7 FORM I
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection Bristol St. N. / Birch St.
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter prang 19tj3_
Peak 211 Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected i Project
Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2y Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ! Volume
j Northbound 1043 536 l576➢ 16
2680 Southbound 106?1 5
Eastbound ___ _ {n .0
r Y' w
Nestbound 6963,
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected:
Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume _
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
❑ : peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume., Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
Me&CCLI EXMLeeIM DATE: 8�22�g3
PROJECT:
A-8 FORM I
.ti
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection Bristol St. N. / Jamboree Rd.
(Existing Traffic Volumes-'Based on Average Winter/Spring 19 _
Peak 2)h Flour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected , Project
Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2% Hour Peak 24 Four i Peak 2+1 Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume VoluK Volume
Q
Northbound 5705 ►ZZ 66 '?Z, _
Southbound 2707 55 3 i 3
Eastbound
f Westbound f- 1531 ZA6 Zl-j() I Z1 �vv
Project Traffic is estimated to be Less than 1% of Projected
Peak 21, Hour Traffic Volume
— Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
: peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
Flak 400 tie dui 1 Exoan�ion DATE: �IZzI83
Y
PROJECT:
3/ A-9 FORM I
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection Coast Hwy./Oran a Ave.
(Existing Traffic Volumes basea on Average Winter/Spring 9
Peak 24 Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional 'Projects Projected 1- of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 2y Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2y Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ! Volume
Northbound 211 ' Z'
j
Southbound 132
Eastbound 2502 631
1 Westbound 4723 e07 I col
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
.Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimate4 to be greater than 1% of Projected
[] t Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
ICI oak- 400 lk6kca.l EX �ova ATE. �1221�
PROJECT:
A-10 FORM I
I
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection Coast Hwy./Prospect Ave.
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring MOM
Peak 2h Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 17: of Projected , Project
Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak V5 Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2y Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
Northbound 113 13
South bound 215 Z� J ',7 (l:
Eastbound 2882
Westbound 5159 UO3 OU �� ��i ' Cl)
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume _
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of PrCjected
Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume., Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
--- io((- ` 00 N1cutcal Cgan'5'tan DATE. ilZz
PROJECT:
33 A-11 FORM I
•- •
l% Traffic-Volume Analysis
Intersection Coast Hwy./Balboa B1.-Superior Ave.
(Existing Traffic Volumes se� on Average Rinter pring 19 _
Peak 2h Hour Approved — I
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 10 of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2y Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
Northbound 1495 (� L� �tj�� (( • ! i
southbound 2655 {� Vic) 2"-7�6 ZY) 7lrj
Eastbound 3196 1 41 lt55 q" 44 It '
i Nestbound 3516
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume
Project'-Traffic is estimated' to be greater than 1% of Projected
❑ -.Peak 211 Hour Traffic Volume. ' Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
VCI 400 �A2dl(C6 MOVI6IC>61 JATE;,_Qi Zz�Q�3
PROJECT:
34 A-12 Fnael t
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection Coast Hwy./Riverside Ave.
(Existing Traffic Volumes on Average Winter/Spring 19 _
Peak 24 Hour Approved ;
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1i; of Projected I Project
Direction Peek 2y Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 21* Hour Peak 2�,Hour Peak 2y Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
Northbound 38 --- rr , 0.4 — 1 (h
South bound 1243
w' I
Eastbound 4509
Westbound 4834 64 Iy
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
[] Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume., Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required.
�� q[1Q �2C�lCQ� CX�ClV1SIC1� DATE: �ry'�S3
PROJECT:
3S A-13 FORM I
It Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection Coast Hwy. / Tustin Ave.
(existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pring 9
Peak 2h Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1;, of Projected ( Project
Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2y Hour Peak 2ty Hour Peek 21j Hour Peak 2y Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume volume
Northbound 12 a- t t
Southbound 281
J (I)
Eastbound 4013
n )
t Westbound 5878
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume
— Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
❑ :. Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume., Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
� ed�cal M zz �3
S I XI�OIVI I GATE-
PROJECT:
36 A-14 FORM I
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection Coast Hwy./Dover Dr.-Bayshore Dr.
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pring 83
Peak 2)1 Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1X.ot Projected Project i
Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 21S Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 24 Hour Peak 24 Hour
Volume Volume Volume Vol Lot Volume Volume I
Northbound 236
Southbound 2655
Eastbound 4025 ,3vv0����� gQj� 5215 JL �j i
i Westbound 6191 '[Vll 15 -1�5)
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected -
�, ..Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume. , Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required.
DATE• �I7'ZIg3
PROJECT:
37 A-15 FORM I
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection Coast Hwy. / 8ayside Dr.
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 _
Peak 2k Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1� of Projeeted Project
Direction Peek Hour Growth Peek 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volueee Volume Volume
Northbound 1481 _-- V ��1 ��i
out bound 155 (r1
Eastbound 5312 �'� f
Hestbound 6054 •
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume. : intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
�C - N1Co1CA
EXD �Jlon DATE.•CtN S ZZ��3
-
PROJECT:
3$ A-16 FORM I
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection Coast Hwy. / Jamboree Rd.
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pring 9
Peak 2k Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1� of Frojftted Project
Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth [Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Peek 2k Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
Northbound 929
soutnbound 4167 L�3 41ZP
Eastbound 3899 �Gj( Yj�j�j r—A�- 55
i westbound 3759 - 1 4 2� (�CiL) /A �J
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2� Hour Traffic Volume _
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
(� Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume: Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
PJIOC l�( EX(xlYl�l W1 DATE:
PROJECT:
39 A-17 FORM 1
q• I �
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection Coast Hwy. / Newport Ctr. Dr.
(Existing Traffic Volumes basea on Average inter pang g 8
Peak 2)i Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1'. of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2k hour Peak 24 Hour Peak 2y hour Peak 2h Hour
Volume Volu" Yo,11u A Volume volume Volume
Northbound __ _
South bound 2181
Eastbound 3585
Westbound 2855• ha) 3� I
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume _
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume., Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
fj�[�k ��ICQ� I.XVI��IW1 DATE: SII�
PROJECT:
40 A-18 FORM I
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection Coast Hwy. / Avocado Ave.
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pring 9 3T
Peak 2;1 Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1� of projected Project
Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2r, Hour Peak 2 Hour
Volume Volume ��`` Volume Volume Volume Volume
Northbound 442 W I D9 FX-5
Southbound 27 (/� l � �r 0
Eastbound 3049 �� �I�GCJ 4RI I
westbound 3363 -71G �" eb 44
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2-11 Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
(] : Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume., Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
DtGLk 400 gedtai LjC"ion DATE! �JI27'��j3
PROJECT:
�f� A-19 FORM I
1 �
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection Coast Hwy. / MacArthur 81.
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average winter/spring 9 _
Peak 2k Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2y Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 24 Hour Peak 2h Hour
Volume Volume Voluft Yoluae Volume Vol Lim
Northbound
Southbound 2510
Eastbound 3326
! westbound 2957 _ IC) �� ��tCJT�/!f 4� ! ��
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume
-- Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
�( . •,Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume.• Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
DATE VIi� J
PROJECT:
g� A-20 FOR14 I
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection Coast Hwy. / Goldenrod Ave.
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pring g83
Peak 2h Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 15 of Projected I Project
Direction Peak 2+ Hour Growth Peak 23s Hour Peak 294 Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2y Hour
Volume Volume Votaae Volume Volume Volume
Northbound 231 5
Southbound 205
Eastbound 4602
Westbound 2858. 1b(o- 46b ! to
Project Traffic is estimated to be Tess than 1% of Projected
Peak 211 Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
❑ Peak 23� Hour Traffic Volume, Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
�� "IIAJ M�I(LUC C )(()dAlCilQ11� DATE: Zz &3
PROJECT:
113 A-21 FORM I
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection Coast Hwy. / Marguerite Ave.
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pring 9
Peak 2k four Approved �
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 10. of Projected t
ek ,2h four Peak 2k Aour P Projec Direction Peak Tk Hour Growth Pe Hour I Peak 2k Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume volume
HDrthbound 616 7
Southbound 719 )
w
Eastbound 4023 C ;
_ x5
f Westbound 2556 _ v�l FJU,
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume
Project-Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
❑ Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume., Intersection ,Capacity Utilization
tI.C.U.) Analysis is required.
12ly- . AM ( wyal Em ,/,fr,i/i ---DATE: g1ZZlea
PROJECT:
41 A-22
�-! FORM I
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection Jamboree Rd. ./ Santa Barbara Dr.
. (Existing Traffic Volumes based on verage Inter pring 19 _
Peak 2h Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1� of Projected I Project
Direction Peak 2u Hour Growth Peako2�Hour Peako2hHHour Peek 2�; Hour Peak 2h Ho
Volume Volume
Volume Volume
Northbound 2165 Alb" /j3Z
Z�4� 0
Southbound 3511 ''` - Z- /I
Eastbound
westbound 1625 (�
Project Traffic is estimated to be- less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimat3 to be greater than 1% of Projected—
[] Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume, Intersection Capacity Utilization
•'•(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
..r
�ICL� Med( cal EXDL(V1510V1 DATE glzZlg3
PROJECT:
457' A-23 FORM I
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection Jamboree Rd. / San Joaquin Hills Rd.
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average nter pring 9 _
Peak 2k Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1" of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2N Hour Peak 2ti Hour I Peak 2h Hour
me
Volume Volume Volume volu Volume ! volumK
Northbound 2167 4b
Sorthbound 4697 1,72
Eastbound 466
westbound 556
1 �
Project Traffic Is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume
" Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected `
. peak 211 Hour Traffic Volume: Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
C�1CL �t{)� �CICGt� EX(�Q4�IUlrl DATE• �J�22�`2J7
PROJECT:
��/ A-24 FORM I
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection• Jamboree Rd / Eastbluff Dr.-Ford Rd.
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pring 19 8
Peak 24 Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1. of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak Z's•Hour Peak 24 Hour Peak 2y Hour
Volume VoivaK Volume Volume Volume ! Volume
Northbound 4106 641 4Q�?r �z � ��
Sout hbound 3898 (Il•%3J �lZ�
Eastbound 1213
' Westbound Jgg
�j Project Traffic is estimated to be less than, 1% of Projected _
Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
[] --.Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
F�Icxk 4co q l(M UW'wx)n DATE:— 812Z183
PROJECT:
A-25
rnn..
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection JambDree •Rd. / Bison Ave.
(Existing Traffic VolUmes ase on verage inter pn ng g _
Peak h Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected I'. of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 24 Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 21i Hour Peak 2y Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
Northbound 4216 q Q ! jA 1 4q
southbound 3758 AA/iJ 4r
Eastbound 198
Westbound 583 I IC),
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected _
Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected —
❑ • : .Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
I�Icx-k 4rx> Medical Ex�a.r�on DATE v12Z1$3 _
PROJECT:
g� A-26 FORM I
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection Jamboree Rd. / Eastbluff Dr. N.
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 83
Peak 2k Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected of Projected ! Project
Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 25 Hour Peak 2$Jiour Peak 2�- Hour Peak 21s Hour
Volume Volume Voluft Volume Volume Volume
Northbound 4524 �1 ZJ�' ?j-7j
Southbound 5080 Ic �Ir �l T
Eastbound 468 'fV7G� t J
Westbound
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume., Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
Dv*-- 4co Med�(oI Exonv)51,Dn DATE.
PROJECT:
�� A-27 FORM I
T
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection Jamboree B1. / MacArthur Bl.
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Inter pring 9 _
Peek 2y Hour Approved I
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1. of Projected I Project
Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2$ Hour Peak 2y Hour Peek 2y Hour I Peek 2y Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
Northbound 1632 67 AA-7 Z l�vlv Z2
Southbound 3086 �(�j G)G� j� (j 1
Eastbound . 1895 4 -J n:72J ZZ. ?j
Westbound 3320 1
' 6
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 24 Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic 'is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected _
❑ Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
:JI.C.U.) Analysis is required. -.
��Ir� MedAI Exr�aai�eY1 DATE:
PROJECT:
A-28 FORM I
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection MacArthur B1. / San Miguel Dr.
(Existing Traffic Vol—um—e-s—Fased on Average Winter/Spring 19 _
Peak 2k Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected ,I Project
Direction Peak 21s Hour Growth Peak 21s Hour Peak 21j,Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2k Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
Northbound 1634 !40
Southbound 2834 Za7j ?Ye�) j �I
Eastbound 1286
Westbound 533• 0 ?1
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
• = Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
`!�u ��ICLt� C�.�Cl�1LJ104� DATE: gl'7i7ilg�
PROJECT:
S� A_29 FORM I
n• T 3
4
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection MacArthur B1. / San Joaquin Hills Rd.
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Xverage inter pring 83`
Peak 2k Hour Approved -�
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1�. of Projected I Project
Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Nour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour
Volume Volume Voluwa Voluoe Volume Volume
Northbound 1789 157 3q1
sorthbound 3502 �Co i5
g1 1 +599
Eastbound 1889 ��/l 3J �/i
i Westbound 900 1v
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
...,Peak 21� Hour Traffic Volume: Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
1"J�1Y NI>`�ICCe EXf)Q.VI'71UY1 DATE; ?11 zz4 J
PROJECT:
�',,2 A-30 FORM I
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection MacArthur 81. / Ford Rd.
(Existing Traffic Vol based on Average inter pring 19 83
Peak 2k Hour Approved —--
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1:, of Projected ! Project
Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2% Hour Peak 2+ Hour Peak 2y Hour Peek 2y Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
Northbound 3086 (Orj
Southbound 5045 2'0 `AZ4
Eastbound 919 ��{' ��� C) -
i westbound 1056
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 211 Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume, Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required.
DATLt_
PROJECT:
J'�.3 A-31 FORM I
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection MacArthur 81. / Bisbn Ave.
; (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pring 83
— i
Peek 2h Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected L, of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peek 2§ Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 24 Hour I Peak 25 Hour j
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ! Volume
Northbound 4096
Southbound 5400' �iiJ"/ Qj23 �/f
Eastbound 9,58 I�
Westbound
---- yJ
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2;1 Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
" Peak 211 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
{I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
I
J{
I
I
e 7 CW
��1C{�L X I>;t�ii Op
-- tn''K' l TE
PROJECT:
y FORM I
A-32 , . ,�• .
Appendix B
ICU Worksheets for 14 Critical
Intersections
55"
IRISINTER*TION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANAL
Intersection San Joaquin Hills Rd. / San Miguel
( Existing Traffic Volumes Bases on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 1981
EXISTING PROPOSED EXIST. EXIST. REGIONAL COMMITTED PROJECTED
Movement Lanes Cep• Lane$ Cap. PK.H9. V/C GROWTH PADJECT V/C Ratio PRM0 ttMCT
Vol. Ratio volute volume r/o ProSect V I'm ytio
Voluee
NL 1600 5 .0031 3
NT 3200 197 .0888*
NR 87 2 0
SL 1600 88 .0550*
ST 3200 129 .0753 q L. ..• r
SR 112 11
EL 3200 261 .0816*
ET 4800 452 .0956 2 I '
ER 7
WL 1600 71 .0444 ry '
WT 4800 262 .0617*
WR 34 33
YELLOWTIME .1000* a
EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACITY UT1LI71fTI0N .3871 t i
1 M
EXfSTING PLUS, C"ITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH W/PROPOSED INPROYEMENTS I.C.U. —
EXISTING PLUS WifTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH PLUS PROJECT I.C.U.
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
..J
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. with systems improvement will be
less than or equal to 0.90
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Description of system improvement:
12)Lcc.iL 40c, MED(CA DiJ DATE: If E I� � ✓
�36 PROJECT ibRM II
INTERSELOON CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALY�
Intersection San Joaquin Hills Rd. / Santa Rosa - Big Canyoff,
( Existing Traffic Volumes Bases on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 1983)
EXIST. EXIST. REGIONAL COM:ITTED PRQIECIED
Mortment EXISTING PROPOSED PK.HR. V/C GROwTrt PRWECT V/C Ratio PAWicI PPWICT
Lanes Cap. Lanes Cap. Vol. Ratio Volta" Volme w/o Project Vol w ryC Patio
Volume
NL 1600 280 .1750*
NT 1600 33 .0206 021 ;
NR 288 1 .1800 14
SL 1600 42 .0263 q
ST 3200 21 .0253* 1 GZLi;
SR 60 Q
EL 1600 40 .0250 O
ET 4800 369 .0940* p Ids, f, �•"
ER 82 Q -
WL 3200 156 .0488* '�j �, 1# (ij11*
WT . 4800 155 .0444 5 rr9j. - a;
WR 58
YELLDWTIME _ .1000* 10' fC
EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION 1 .4431 I I
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH W/PROPOSED INPROVEMENTS I.C.U. ' ::;
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH PLUS PRDJECf•I.C.U.
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. with systems improvement will be
less than or equal to 0.90
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Description of system improvement:
DATt:
57 PROJECT FORM II
B-2
INTEF*TION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANA1P,SIS
Intersection San Joaquin Hills Rd. / Santa Cruz - Big Cannon
( Existing Traffic Volumes Bases on Average Dai'1y Traffic Winter/Spring 19 83)
EXISTING PROPOSED EXIST. EXIST. REGIONAL COMMITTED PROJECTED
Noveaent PX.HR. V/C GROWTH PROJECT V/C Ratio PROJECT PPOJECT
Lanes Cep. lanes Cep. Vol. Ratio Volteee Vol uee w/o Project Volume V/C Ratio
Voline
NL 3200 • 280 .0875 (C54
NT 1600 15 .0369* I 12l 121")
NR 44 13C
SL 1600 53 .0331*
ST 1600 9 .0056 I OOfn� OU�7
SR 1600 _ 19 .0119 6 015(� 015(p
EL 1600 103 .0644* 4 , G i 1 M)It
ET 3200 384 .1200
ER 1600 199 .1244
WL 1600 19 .0119 52 ow
WT 4800 687 .1475* 1 la�l0 I:d�
WR 1 21 0
YELLOMTINE 1000* i
EXISTIMO INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION .3819 1 E
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH M/PROPOSED INPROVENENTS I.C.U.
EXISTING PLUS COM ITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH PLUS PROJECT I.C.U. 74n,
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. with systems improvement will be
less than or equal to 0.90
Description of system improvement: `
E2ICCI G([X`j 1CA DATE• ��l l�
SS PROJECT B-3 FORM II
INTERSECIN CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSID
Intersection Bristol St. N. / Jamboree Rd.
( Existing Traffic Volumes Bases on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 19AI
EXIST. EXIST. REGIONAL C00"TTED PROJECTED
Ibrewent EXISTING PROPOSED PK•NR, V/C GRO'.ITH PROJECT V/C Ratio Pb!nICT PPOJECT
Lanes Cap. lanes Cap. Vol. Ratio VDILM Vol me w/o Project V,.,
Volme � V/C Ratio
NL . 4800 1839 .3831*
NT 3200 859 .2684 2 142 61?
MR ---- -
SL ----
ST 4000 774 .1935* 2 S(� Z 2 z
SR 2400 374 .I558 2
EL O
ET
ER
WL 7
WT • •6400 616 .0977* 5
WR 2 D
YELLQWTIME .1000*
EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ,7743
EXISTING PLUS COIMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH W/PROPOSED INPROYENENTS I.C.U. t Q
EXISTI4G PLUS COFMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH PLUS PROJECT I.C.U. •q �C
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. with systems improvement will be
less than or equal to 0.90
- � - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Description of system improvement:
DATE:
PROJECT FORM II
59 B-4
INTEROTION CAPACITY UTILI,4TION MAl.Y9Is
Intersection Coast Hwy./Dover Dr.-Bayshore Dr. _
( Existing Traffic Volumes Bases on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 1983)
EXISTING PROPOSED EXIST. jEXIS7. REGIDNAL CO MITTED PROJECTED
!forewent Lanes Cep. Lanes Cap. PX.HR. GROVTR PROJECT V/C Ratio PROJECT PROJECT
Vol. volute Yolw* w/o Project Volume V/C Ratio
VOiueNL 1600 22 8NT 3200 39 5*
NR 33 p
SL 4800 960 .2000* , 2ai �
ST 1600 66 .0413 Q
SR 1600 149 .0931
EL 3200 115 .0359*
ET 480D 1553 .3298
a ER 30
WL 1600 .0306
WT • • 4800 1684 .3508* r Q 'i5
WR 1600 - 1007 .6294
YELLOWTIME ,1000*
EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION .7092
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH W/ ARMED INPROVEMENTS I.C.U, a Q'j
EXISTING PLUS 5;1 TEO PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH PLUS PROJECi•I.C.U.•- I g
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.9.0
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. with systems improvement will be
less than or equal to 0.90
Description of system improvement:
C� Med�cQ( Dav►"i ova DATE
PROJECT FORM II
INTERSAON CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYA
Intersection Coast Hwy. / Bayside'Dr.
( Existing Traffic Volumes Bases on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 198
EXIST. EXIST. REGIONAL COMIITTEO PRDJECtio
IED
EXISTING PROPOSED Y/C Ratio PROJECT PP.OJEat
MDrement Lanes Cap. Lanes Cap. RatV/Cio
GROWTH PROJECT w/o Project Yoture V/C Ratio
Vol.Yol. Retlo Volune Volume Volume
NL 3200 611 .1909* $ e H 3 13
MT 1600 28 .0175 10
NR 1600 1 37 .0231 1p
SL 1600 12 .0075 (�
ST 1600 10 .0288* 0264
SR 36 b
EL 1600 71 .0444* Q , 0 �+4 q , 0¢4
ET 4800 1578 .3288 2b
ER 1600 580 .3626 3 to(0
WL 1600 20 .0125 0 I 0_12_ S
WT - 480Q 2726 .5723* 1 I L}z Ir9
WR - 21
YELLOWTIME - .1000* DO C� i i . L0 0
EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION .9364 I
1 I I
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH W/PROPOSED INPROYEMENTS I.C.U. C i
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH PLUS PROJECT I.C.U.
0E6 -1
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic .I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. with systems improvement will be
less than or equal to 0.90
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Description of system improvement:
IIO�G �uC �F� ICv I >GlV1G.I GY1 DATE:
61 PROJECT B-6 FORM II
INTE*TION CAPACITY UTILI7AT•ION ANANIS s
Intersection Coast Hwy. / Jamboree Rd.
( Existing Traffic Volumes Bases on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 19M)
EXISTING PROPOSED EXIST. EXIST. REGIONRL COMITTED PROJECTED
Movement Law Cap. Lane$ Cap. PX.NR. V/C GRDVTN PROJECT V/C Ratio PROJECT PRDJECT
Vol, Ratio Volf,ie Volume W/o Project Volue+e V/C Ratio
Volume
NL Man 28 * Q ' b 1 , 011
NT 3200 211 .0919 2 • O�f 2 , 09 Z5�
NR 83
SL 1600 240 .1500
ST 3200 527 ,1647
SR 3200 -1230 .3644*
EL 3200 w _ 554 .1731 / 2.20q ,7-
ET 3260 1054 .3294
ER 1600 20 .0181 0 1 10
WL 3200 150 .0469 � 17 q
WT . •4800 1437 .2994*
WR MP J
-1600 110 .0688
YELL01lTIME ..1000* _ a I 0 d QI i r
EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION .8013 j — �— '1 6Lk
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROfiTH If/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. Q E
a
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GRMH PLUS PROJECT I.C.U.
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. with systems improvement will be
less than or equal to 0.90
Description of system improvement:
*31D(.y- 40c) MPdI al 'C�X1��V7��16Y� DATE 00 Ig)--�7
PROJECT FORM II
B-7
+ INTERS&ION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANAL+S
Intersection Coast Hwy. /Newport Ctr. Dr.
( Existing Traffic Volumes Bases on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 19 0)
EXIST. EXIST. REGIONAL COM I77E0 PROJECTED
EXISTING PROPOSED V/C Ratio PROJECT PPDJECT
Mpvement DA.NR. V/C GROWTH PROJECT
Lines Cap. Unes Cap. Vol. Ratio Volume Volume w/o Project Volume V/C Ratio
Volume
NL O
NT
NR
SL 3200 348 .1088*
ST
SR N.S. 677 2
EL 3200 305 •0953*
ET 3200 1206 .3769 2 ^,
ER Q
WL
WT • - 3200 1021 .3191* G1
WR 1600 137 .0856 c 3 • I!� j
YELLOMTIME .1000*
EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION 6232 1 1 1
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH Y/PROPOSED INPROYEMENTS I.C.U.
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH OLDS PR kd I.C.U. � •
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. with systems improvement will be
less than or equal to 0.90
Description of system improvement:
DATE• l �,�Pr3
PROJECT FORM II
63 s-8
INTERS#ION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANAL* v
Intersection Coast Hwy. / MacArthur B1.
( Existing Traffic Volumes Bases on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 1983)
EXIST. EXIST, RISICMAL C"ITTED PRWECIED
EXISTING Lane& CaV/C V/C Ratio PRWECT PRWECT
Ib.enent Lanes GD• Lanes GD• PX.NR. Ratio
Volume PRWECT w/o Project Volume V/C Ratio
Vol. Utio Volume Volume Volume
NL O
NT O
'NR
SL 3200 923 .2884* r ' � �j r 34 5
ST C)
SR 1600 213 .1331 Z �(pQ� J3 a
EL 1600 223 .1394 p 0 )q( L I l of 5
ET 3200 1154 .3606* 22g 3 , " i 11
ER 0
WL 0
WT . 4800 805 .1677 114
WR 372 .2325 161, 12-�tS 3 i 3 D00
YELLOWTIME .1000*
1 a
EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACTTY UTILIZATION .7490 I I a
EXISTING PLUS•C"ITTED PLUS REGIONAL GAMH N/PROPOSEO IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. ,
E%ISTTNG PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL'GAONTH PLUS PROJtd l.C.U.' r 1W.
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. with systems improvement will be
less than or equal to 0.90
Description of system improvement:
Nock 400 A&A GI DATE• Vi 1�6, 5
PROJECT 8-9 FORM II
� ds'
INTERSE•ON CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYO
Intersection Jamboree Rd. / San Joaquin Hills Rd.
( Existing Traffic Volumes Bases on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring iy
EXIST. EXIST. REGIONAL [OMITTED PROJECTED
EXISTING PROPOSED V/C Ratio MoreaKnt PRatio
Volume PROJECT PRDJEC; PPOJEC;Lanes Cap. Lanes Cap. w/o Project
Vol.ot. Ratio Volume Volume Volume - xolv.e SIC Ratio
NL 1600 102 .0638* 7i �,_•r�, J, s,J
NT 4800 870 .1813
NR 1600 1 106 .0663
SL 3200 534 .1669
ST 3200 1404 .4389*
SR 1600 193 .1206
EL 86
ET 4800 40 .0262*
Ct /
)
L L• 'L
ER N.S. 60
WL 150 Zq
WT 4800 62 .0441* CAI CA Z
WR 1600 34 .0213 (, ► I G� 5 !' Imo)
YELLOWTIME .1000*
EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION .6730 j 1 —
EXISTING PLUS 6011kli Eb PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH W/PROPOSED INPROVEMENTS I.C.U.
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH PLUS PROJECT I.C.U.
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. with systems improvement will be
less than or equal to 0.90
Description of system improvement:
DATE:
PROJECT FORM II
dra' B-10
INTERSE*ON CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSS
.e:! .
Intersection MacArthur B1. / San Miguel Dr.
( Existing Traffic Volumes Bases on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 1583 )
EXISTING PROPOSED EXIST, EXIST. REGIONAL COM 11TEG PROJECTED
Movement PX,HR. WC GROWTH PROJECT V/C Ratlo PPDJECT PROJECT
Lines Gp, Lines cap. vot. Ratio Volume volume w/o Project volume v/e Ratio
volume
NL 1600. 35 .0219* , 0,21910 / os4A '
NT 3200 498 .1922
NR 117
SL 1600 5 .0031 tOC3 a 0031
ST 3200 1202 .4019* , 2+64•
SR 84
EL 3200 288 .0900
ET 3200 178 .1084* 0 a 1 I . 123
ER 169 Q
WL 1600 100 .0625*
WT 3200 66 .0225 0 2I I 0 Z4
WR O
YELlOWi1ME .1000* 10 00 ; 010 D
EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION .6947 j
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED-PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH W/PROPOSED INPROVEMENTS I.C.U. r i
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH PLUS PROJECT I.C.U.
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90
❑ Proj cted plus project traffic I.C.U. with systems improvement will be
less than or equal to 0.90
Description of system improvement:
elm
d� PROJECT FORM II
B-11
INTERSE•ON• CAPACITY UTIL4 1`10N ANALYO
Intersection MacArthur Bl. / San Joaquin Hills Rd.
( Existing Traffic Volumes Bases on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 19 8�
EXIST. EXIST. REGIONAL C"ITTED PROJECTED -
EXISTING PROPOSED More+nent Lanes Cap. lanes Cap. PX. Y/[ GROWTH
PROJECT Y/C Ratio w/o Project ►Rp,RCT PRCECT
Vol.l. Ratio Yolune Yolunie Volume Yo l.,oe Y/C Raio
NL : 1600 52 .0325* 7�03-7
NT 3200 ' 718 .2266
NR 7 0
SL 3200 374 .1169 - -46 1 . 131
ST 3200 1115 .3484* 3I 40 g:R , 4D66
SR 1600 168 .1050
EL 3200 501 .1566* I 06
ET 4800 299 .0763 2 ai
ER 67 2
WL 1600 16 .0100 0 . 01 0 , C I r
WT •4800 179 .0715*
WR 164 a
YELLOWTIME .100D* , 1 G G Oi i . 1 o 6^
EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION I .709'0 j E
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH W/PROPOSED INPROVEMENTS I.C.U. p
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH PLUS PROJECT I.C.U.. $ 22
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. with systems improvement will be
less than or equal to 0.90
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Description of system improvement:
DATE:
PROJECT FORM II
�' 67 E3-1z
INTERS&ION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALI& 'r '
Intersection MacArthur B1."y ford Rd.
( Existing Traffic Volumes Bases on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 1983 )
EXISTING PROPOSED EXIST. Exist. REGIONAL COMMITTED PROJECTED
1b.ercnt PA.HR. V/C GROWTH PROTECT V/C Ratio PROJECT PROJECT
Lanes Cap. Lanes Cap. Vol. Ratio Volume Volume w/o Project Volume V/C Ratio
Volume
NL 3200 35 .0109* O , 01O O C?
NT 480b 1264 .2633
NR N.S. 38 p
SL 3200 573 .1791 0 a l �q . 1-Ict I
ST 3200 1748 .5463* 309 1 , L04 Q C rl a (, 4
SR 1600 158 .0988 0
EL 3200 113 .0353* Q j S
ET 3200 146 .0456
ER 1600 86 .0538 0 S , 05-
WL 1600 23 .0144 , 0 kQ 01414
WT . 1 d
WR 4800 t3I0 .0835* Q , n DU3?
YELLOWTIME .1000* r 10 00 j , t J C 0
E
EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION . 160
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH W/PROPOSED INPROVEMERTS I.C.U.
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH PLUS PROJECT'I.C.U.—
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. with systems improvement will be
less than or equal to 0.9D
Description of system improvement: `
DATE FV)
PROJECT FORM II
G8 • J
- 8-13
' INTERSEC•N CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYST♦
Intersection MacArthur B1. / Bison Ave.
( Existing Traffic Volumes Bases on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 1983)
EXIST. EXIST. REGIONAL C"ITTED PROJECTED
EXISTING PROPOSED V/C Ratio PROJECT PPOJECT
lbrement Lanes Cap. Lanes Cap. PK.l. RatV/Cio
GROWTHVolum PROJECT w/o Project Volume V/C Ratio
Vol. Ratio Volume Volume Volume
NL 1600 61 .0381* p -,i•/k
NT 3200 1634 .5106
NR
SL
ST 4800 2578 .5371* Utc
SR N.S. 112
EL 3200 248 .0775*
ET
ER N.S. 91
WL
WT
WR
YELLOWTIME .1000* i i
IG� - �oa)
EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION 1 .7527 j I
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH W/P.ROPOSED INPROVEMENTS I.C.U. , � J
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH PLUS PROJECT I.C.U. 1
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. 'with systems improvement will be
less than or equal to 0.90
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Description of system improvement:
DATE.•
PROJECT B-14 FORM II
• ` ri
I I
Appendix C
ICU Worksheets with Mitigation Measures
Jamboree Road at Bristol Street North
Jamboree Road at Pacific Coast Highway
' r INTEFTIDN CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANA*S
Intersection Bristol St. N. / Jamboree Rd. (A)
( Existing Traffic Volumes Bases on Average Daily Traffit Winter/Spring 19 83
EaISTIM PRDPDSED EXIST. EXIST. REGIDHXL C"111Eo ►RDJECIED
Rbrewent Lanes Cap. tanet Cap, P6.HR• Y/C &RUTH PRWECI V/C Ratio PRWECT PPDJECT
Vol. Ratio Volme VOIuaK *to Project Volume V/C Ratio
Volumm
NL 4800 f&O Z"f(0 Al 2-& 45 .20000 2
NT 3200 fy,aj 859 .2684 Q 42 , 313 _
NR ---- N• fF — — Z54 — 10 —
SL ----
ST 4000 774 .1935* '�_ 1,5(o Z
SR 2400 374 .1558
EL Q
ET
ER
WL 7 Q
WT 6400 616 .0977*. 5( I 5 2 q I .12 q S
WR 2 .
YELLOWTIME .1000* . IOOei a
EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION —
EXISTING PLUS COMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH W/PRDPDSED INPROYEMENTs I.C.U. 0.7777 1
EXISTING PLUS CDIMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH PLUS PROJECT I.C.U.-
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.9D
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. with systems improvement will be
less than or equal to 0.90
-
� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 - - - - - - - - - - - -
(A) Description of system improvement: Reflects *1987 conditions with
the extension of the- Corona del Mar Freeway to MacArthur Boulevard.
NB approach to provide: 1 NB left turn lane
2 NB thru lanes
1 NB optional thru/right turn lane
1 NB right turn only lane
it was assumed that 15 percent of the traffic currently turning
left from NB Jamboree Boulevard onto Bristol Street North would
con �A
continue to yturn left in the future with destinations in the local
t 1)(K 40D 1` tdk(A � of) & DATE: � I II 103
7� area. The remainder woul turn right to access the Corona FORM II
elel Mar Freeway.
`r . C-1
INIEWCTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANSSIS
Intersection Coast I*. / Jamboree Rd.
( Existing Traffic Volumes Bases on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 19.U)
EXISTING PRDPOSED EXIST. EXIST. REGIONAI. C"ITI[p PRWECIEO
tb•rAeat Clines Cap, t►nes Cap, PX.HR• V/C GROYIH PRWFCT Y/C Ratio PROJECT PROJECT
Vol. Ratio Volume Volume W/o Project Volue V/C Ratio
Volume
NL
NT 3200 211 .0919 s oq 2-4 p q ZS"
NR 83
SL 1600 240 .1600 .I5
ST 3200 527 .1647 •
SR 3200 •1230 :3844*
EL 3200 _ _ 654 .1731 122ba
ET 3200 1054 .3294
ER 1600 ._ 20 .0181 ,
WL 3200 150 .0469 e pl i U
WT • -4899- 1437
WR 110
YELLOWTIME .1000* . tj Gt.��
EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION
EXISTING PLl'!� C- MIITTED PLUS REGIONAL GR04(TN M/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U.
EXISTING PLUS COlMITTEO'PLUS REGIONAL GROKfH PLUS PROJECT I.C.U.
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U'. will be less than or equal to 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90
❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. with systems improvement will be
less than or equal to 0.90
- - .- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Description of system improvement:
Convert WB right turn lane to an optional right turn/through
lane.
DD M E �CGt� �X1>^r�15IbY1 DATE 4blll I��7
7a PROJECT C-2 FORM II
BASMACIYAN-DARNELL, INC.
\�� ENGINEERING AND PLANNING
4262 Campus Drive,Suite B•1
Newport Beach,California 92660 Transportation, Traffic, Munldpal, Transit
(714)549.9940
TRANSMITTAL
TO: City of Newport Beach DATE: 10/10/83
3300 Newport Boulevard PROJECT NO.
Newport Beach, California 92663 830703
ATTN: Mr. Fred Talarico
SUBJECT: Block 40.0 Medical Expansion-Parking Study
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE TRANSMITTED: HEREWITH ® ❑
Letter Report
THE ABOVE ITEMS ARE TRANSMITTED: AT YOUR REQUEST ]9YJ FOR YOUR INFORMATION ❑ ,
FOR YOUR REVIEW ❑ ❑
REMARKS: t Wit`
i,
� pp�/�j� •.CEO i
CALIF fgCy
n.
Tobie C. Stockwell
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PLAN REVIEW REQUEST
Date August 19, 1983
_ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION IVV _`
X PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT X PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN)
T TRAFFIC ENGINEER
_FIRE DEPARTMENT _PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT.
_PLAN REVIEW DIVISION
_PARKS & RECREATION
_POLICE DEPARTMENT
_MARINE SAFETY
_GRADING
APPLICATION OF Frank Rhodes
FOR Traffic Study
Request to approve a Traffic Study for an 80,000± sq.ft. (gross) medical
office building in Block 400 of Newport Center.
LOCATED AT: 400 Newport Center
REPORT REQUESTED BY: August 25_, 1983
COMMISSION REVIEW: September 8, 1983
COMMENTS: lVeAl4rf
i9
RECEIVED Q
rtmC
Sg-jIR' Ate. "
Signature Date
• CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PLAN REVIEW REQUEST
Pate August 19, 1,9.83D
_ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION
X
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT X ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN)
X TRAFFIC ENGINEER
FIRE DEPARTMENT _PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT.
_PLAN REVIEW DIVISION
_PARKS & RECREATION
_POLICE DEPARTMENT
_MARINE SAFETY
GRADING
APPLICATION OF Frank Rhodes
FOR Traffic Study
Request to approve a Traffic Study for an 80,000f sq.ft. (gross) medical
office building in Block 400 of Newport Center.
LOCATED AT: 400 Newport Center
REPORT REQUESTED BY: August 25, 1983
COMMISSION REVIEW: September 8, 1983
COMMENTS- ' ( i
Csy{J'Ip0C&nl - skoJ\ 6z -re-Aow-p-cL Av CA.S6 'r�Qw- IW�"A`�/(�'0V2.me,46,
ItiA�.9l c)v. ✓JC-4P. \S OYtcTC iy bCcc.�nC.w�c.�� t�G,e. �u�l.�G.
Signature (i?_l C,f wwvx.14 Date
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach will hold a
public hearing on the application of Frank Rhodes for a Traffic Study on property located at
400 Newport Center Drive.
Request to approve a Traffic Study for an 80,OOOt sq.ft. (gross) medical office building in
Block 400 of Newport Center.
This project has been reviewed, and it has been determined that it is categorically
exempt under the requirements of the California Environmental Qualities Act.
Notice is hereby further given that said public hearing will be held on the 8th day of
September 1983, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Newport Beach City
Hall, at which time and place any and all persons interested may appear and be heard
thereon.
James Person, Secretary
Planning Commission
City of Newport Beach
NOTE: The expense of this notice is paid from a filing fee collected from the applicant.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach will hold a
public hearing on the application of Frank Rhodes for a Traffic Study on property located at
400 Newport Center Drive.
Request to approve a Traffic Study for an 80,000± sq.ft. (gross) medical office building in
Block 400 of Newport Center.
This project has been reviewed, and it has been determined that it is categorically
exempt under the requirements of the California Environmental Qualities Act.
Notice is hereby further given that said public hearing will be held on the 8th day of
September 1983, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Newport Beach City
Hall, at which time and place any and all persons interested may appear and be heard
thereon.
James Person, Secretary
Planning Commission
City of Newport Beach
NOTE: The expense of this notice is paid from a filing fee collected from the applicant.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PLAN REVIEW REQUEST
Date August 19, 1983
_ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION
X PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT X PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN)
X TRAFFIC ENGINEER
FIRE DEPARTMENT _PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT.
_PLAN REVIEW DIVISION
PARKS & RECREATION
_POLICE DEPARTMENT
_MARINE SAFETY
GRADING
APPLICATION OF Frank Rhodes
FOR Traffic Study
Request to approve a Traffic Study for an 80,OOOt sq.ft. (gross) medical
office building in Block 400 of Newport Center.
LOCATED AT: 400 Newport Center
REPORT REQUESTED BY: August 25, 1983
COMMISSION REVIEW: September 8, 1983
COMMENTS:
Signature Date
l
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach will hold a
public hearing on the application of 429#�� R465=99
for USE PERMIT RESUBDIVISION
VARIANCE AMENDMENT TENTATIVE MAP TRACT OTHERMAZ
on property located at � � �/� �
Request to 4)oRlG' of_7 A 714A i=/ ��Q aw� c�� J /.
-
�,�
This project has been reviewed, and it has been determined that it is categorically
exempt under the requirements of the California Environmental Qualities Act.
NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that a Negative Declaration has been prepared by the City
Qof Newport Beach in connection with the application noted above. It -is the present
intention of the City to accept the Negative Declaration and supporting documents. The
City encourages members of the general public to review and comment on this
documentation. Copies of the Negative Declaration and supporting documents are available
for public review and inspection at the Planning Department, City of Newport Beach, 3300
West Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California, 92663, (714) 640-2197.
NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that an Environmental Impact Report has been prepared in
Qconnection with the application noted above. It is the present intention of the City to
accept the Environmental Impact Report and supporting documents. The City encourages
members of the general public to review and comment on this documentation. Copies of the
Environmental Impact Report and supporting documents are available for public review and
inspection at the Planning Department, City of Newport Beach, 3300 West Newport Boulevard;
Newport Beach, California, 92663 (714) 640-2197.
Notice is hereby further given that said public hearing will be held on the day of
1983, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Newport Beach
City Hall, at which time and place any and all persons interested may appear and be heard
thereon.
Dave Goff, Secretary
Planning Commission
City of Newport Beach
NOTE: The expense of this notice is paid from a filing fee collected from the applicant.
1
BD BAMACIYAN-QARNELL416.
* ENGINEERING AND PLANNING
s Transportation, Traffic,Municipal, Transit
4262 Campus Drive,Suite B•1 Newport Beach,California 92660 (714)649-9940
April 26, 1483
Mr. Mitch Brown �j ��3?E�vo,
PBR
18012 Sky Park Circle
Irvine, California 92714 r
Subject: Proposal to Provide Traffic Engineering Services
for Newport Center Block 400 Medical Offices
Dear Mr. Brown:
In accordance with your request Basmaciyan-Darnell, Inc. f is
pleased to present this proposal to provide traffic engineering
services for the subject project. It is our understanding that
this work will be an extension of our services provided for
GPA 81-2 and will be expanded to provide Traffic Phasing
Ordinance analyses and a parking demand study. The following
outlines the SCOPE OF SERVICES, PROJECT BUDGET and PROJECT
SCHEDULE.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
1. Data Collection
A. Review existing transportation/traffic conditions.
B. Assemble existing traffic volume counts, turning
movement counts and traffic phasing ordinance
work sheets.
C. Collect 24-hour machine counts for a duration of
three C3) days for all entrances/exits to Block 400
to determine appropriate generation'rates for the
project.
D. Concurrently with the machine traffic countsf
conduct a parking demand study to determine actual
parking demands for existing Block 400. The
parking study will consist of tabulating parking
demand for the three days studied.between the hours
of 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM, the number of vehicles
parked on Block 400. and the adjacent streets will
be. tabulated every half hour.
x
Mr. Mitch Brown
PBR
April 26, 1983
Pace -2-
E. Assemble previous parking demand studies for the
project area.
2. Estimate project related trip generation based on the data
collected in Task 1. Trip distribution to/from the project
site will be determined through the use of a select-zone
loading of the Newport-Costa Mesa Model.
3. Traffic Phasing Ordinance Analysis
The proposed project will be analyzed pursuant to the
City of Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance and
Council Policy S-1. The TPO analysis will be performed
for the intersections on Coast Highway, MacArthur
Boulevard, Jamboree Road and Bristol Street.
4. Analyze the parking demand data and determine the number
of parking spaces needed for the existing facilities and
the proposed project.
5. Review On-Site Circulation
A. Internal Circulation.
B. Access Locations.
C. Traffic Control needs.
6 . Mitigation Measures
Determine applicable mitigation measures as appropriate
for Traffic Phasing Ordinance.•
7. Report
A report will be prepared in appropriate format and will
incorporate the previous work performed for the project
in GPA 81-2. The report will generally' include:
A. Introduction and Description of Project.
B. Existing Conditions.
C. Project-Related Traffic.
D. Traffic Phasing Ordinance Analysis.
Mr. Mitch Brown
PBR
April 26, 1983
Page -3-
E. Parking Analyses.
F. Mitigation Measures. '
G. Summary of Findings and Conclusions.
8. Meetings
Be available if needed for attendance at public meetings.
PROJECT BUDGET
The fee for our services would be on a time-and-materials basis
with a maximum not-to-exceed. We offer to perform the proposed
services at a fee not-to-exceed $4,670.00. A copy of our
standard hourly billing rate schedule is attached. Attendance
at public hearings is not included in the above fee, but will
be provided at a cost of $240. 00 for each meeting.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Assuming authorization to proceed is given the week of May 91 1983,
the data collection can begin the following week and the work
completed five weeks after notice to proceed.
Please call me if you have any questions or need additional
information.
Sincerely,
BASMACIYAN-DARNELL, INC.
Bill E. Darnell, P.E.
BED/kf
Enclosure
vEc: Mr. Fred Talarico
City of Newport Beach
\D1 B MACIYAN-®ARNELL41kC.
ENGINEERING AND PLANNING
Transportation,Traffic,Municipal, Transit
4262 Campus Drive,Suite B•1 Newport Beach,California 92660 (714)549-9940
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BILLING RATES
(Effective July 1, 1982)
Firm Principals
Project Work . . . . . . . . . . . $ 58.00/hr.
Public Hearings/SpecialPresentations
( 4 hours minimum ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75.00/hr.
Expert Witness Work
Background Preparation . . . . . . . . . . 75. 00/hr.
Court Appearance ( 4 hours minimum ) . . . . . . . 100.00/hr.
Senior Transportation Engineer/Planner. . . . . . . . . . . 44. 00/hr.
Transportation Engineer/Planner . . . . . . . . . . . _ 36. 00/hr.
Designer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32.0 0/hr.
Assistant Transportation Engineer/Planner . . . . . . . . . 28. 00/hr.
Transportation Analyst. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24. 00/hr.
Senior Engineering/Planning Technician. . . . . . . . . . . 25.00/hr.
Engineering/Planning Technician . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22.00/hr.
Engineering/Planning Aide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16. 00/hr.
Junior Engineering/Planning Aide. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12.00/hr.
Secretary/Typist. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16. 00/hr..
Necessary auto travel will be charged at $0.25 per mile.
Reproduction, materials, and other non-wage costs will be invoiced
at direct cost plus 10 percent administrative charge.
Terms are 30 days net. Otherwise subject to 1h percent per month
interest charge. ,
NOTE: Billing rates are reviewed periodically and
are adjusted as necessary.
TO 1552 (11.76)
i a
Plant Service Information Guarantee
999328
NO. FEE
P 999328 $ 53. 00
LIABILITY YOUR REFERENCE
$ 100. 00 300 FT. VARIANCE
Title Insurance and Trust Company, a California corporation,does hereby guarantee
CAUSEY & RHODES
ATTN: FRANK RHODES
1401 AVOCADO AVE. PENTHOUSE SUITE
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660
who, by requesting this limited guarantee agrees that the liability of the company hereunder shall not exceed the liability
herein stated and shall be limited to actual loss if less than said amount, that, as appears from an examination of its lot
books or property indices, information as to the matters herein specified pertaining to land herein described is as follows:
NAMES OF OWNER, ADDRESSES AND ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBERS OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN A 300' (OR
100' RADIUS) OF ASSESSOR' S PARCEL NO. 442-082-02
No guarantee is made as to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter above shown, and if the information was
requested by reference to a street address,no guarantee is made that said land is the same as said address.
Dated as of AUGUST 3 , 1983 @7:30 A.M.
Title Insurance and Trust Company
TC/DE
by
IIJ
✓,'��:_ "�'_rY°r}, PRESIDENT
Attest
y -'• .,,,£ �, e SECRETARY
S � ,•
191t1t.•:��:.•:.�`,4`a
Please note carefully the Liability Exclusions and Limitations and the specific assurances afforded by this guarantee. If
you wish additional liability, or assurances other than as contained herein, please contact the Company for further infor-
mation as to the availability and cost.
•
--=--- -- - - -------------------� - ------=------------------ - ----- ------- - ---1
Irvine Co Irvine Cc
J C Penney Co #123' Causey W Rhodes
Tax Dept P.O. BOX 4015 1401 Avocado Ave
Buena Park, CA Newport Beach, CA 92660
442-021-08_ __ ______________ ---- -- --------------------_- -------_-_______- ---II
Irvine Co $!vine Co
550 Newport Center Dr. 8 Richhrd Vick
Newport Beach, CA 92660 359 San Miguel Dr Stc',.201.
Newport Beach, CA 92960
--==-=---------------
Irvine Co Irvine Co
550 Newport Center Dr. S D C Inc.
Newport Beach, CA 92660 P.O. BOX 1880
Newport Beach, CA 92960
_---------_ ._-_______ __-_�.. _-----
Irvine Co Irvine Co
J W Robinson Co M S Clegg Co
600 W 7Th St 1700 E. Dyer Rd #225
Los Ange34e, CA Santa Ana, CA 92702
.A42vU -2,4-- - -- ---------=------ 442T 9L-Q3----------------- ---------___------------ ---
Irvine Co Irvine CO
V,Vaxnk Rhodes 8 Prestige Moldingd LTD
607 N Central Ave P.O. BOX 8709
Glendale, CA Newport Beach, CA 92660
- 442-082-03 442-091-04
= =
--- --- . . . . - ---�-----------------;-------------'- ------- ------------------- --- -- - - -
Irvine Co Irvine Co
$5.0 Newport Canter Dr. Edwards Theatres
Newport Beach, CA 92060 300 E Newport Center Dr
Newport Beach, CA 92660
442-091-112
Irvine Co. Irvine Co.
0- Newport Center Dr. 550 Newport Center Dr P
Newport Beach, CA 92660 . Newport Beach, CA 93660
__db2:A82^Q5 _ 442-091-15 _»»
Irvine Co
Rhodes & Cawsey
607 N Central Ave
Glendale, CA
.A42.-082.-Q7-____�------------ ----------------------------------------
wine Co
1401 Avocado Ave
imathouse suite
Sowpwrt Beach, CA 92660
Irvine Co
5Si0 Newport Center Dr.
ltewport Beach, CA 92660 ;
AAj-ftaq-nQ
------------------ .- ------
Irvine Co Irvine Co
J C Penney Co #1230 Causey I Rhodes
Tax Dept P.O. BOX 4015 1401 Avocado Ave
Buena Park, CA Newport Beach, CA 92660
442-021-08 _ 442-082-10
Irvine Co Tlvine Co
550 Newport Center Dr. 8 Ricabrd Nick
Newport Beach, CA 92660 359 San Miguel Dr Stil.203;:
' Newport Beach, CA 92E60
442-021-16_ ---- 01
--------- -- ---- -- ----
Irvine Co Irvine Co
550 Newport Center Dr. S D C Inc.
Newport Beach, CA 92660 P.O. BOX 1880
" Newport Beach, CA 92060 ;:
------------, --------- ----- - --
Irvine Co Irvine Co
J W Robinson Co M S Clegg Co
600 W 7Th St 1700 E. Dyer Rd #225
Los Angela#, CA Santa Ana, CA 92702
--442-=-t-24-------------------- AAZ-Q9?.-D3----------------- ------__--- -------------
Irvine Co Irvine CO
Frank Rhodes 8 Prestige Moldingd LTD
607 N Central Ave P.O. BOX 8709
Glendale, CA Newport Beach, CA 92660 ;
442-Q82-03. . , ------ Y--442-091-04 ------- -r - -- --- - --
Irvine Co Irvine Co
550 Newport Center Dr. Edwards Theatres
Newport Beach, CA 92£60 300 E Newport Center Dr
Newport Beach, CA 92660 ;:
...__- -__-- .---.---------------- -- ------ -
442-091-12 -
Irvine Co. Irvine Co.
550 Newport Center Dr.. 550 Newport Center Dr ;
Newport Beaclli, CA 92660 „ Newport Beach, CA 92660 ;;
;
- 8 -
442-091-15
Irvine Co
Rhodes & Cawsey
607 N Central Ave
Glendale, CA
------ --------------------------------
Irvine Co
1401 Avocado Ave
Penthouse suite ;
Newport Beach, CA 926-60
. 442-082-08. - -------_- _ -- _- : - :- _ - .--.- <__--- -• _-=>-- _.:_.--
Irvine Co
550 Newport Center Dr.
Kewport Beach, CA 92560 ;
4_42__082-09------------- --
-
,r
442-08
200,
[`ot
o -9$
ye' Y 40
On- V aJ
yo N P.M. 54-23' _
m PPAR./& t IO
2.048 AC.(C)
J:a
a� ? /
� o -
/RV/NE
C
` 56 ti 60 7, .
V •S� O asY 62.83— P.M. 27-43 -
R. Q• ze ce' a -
r t\ S. 64-23 1-t oi�,
�\ } P.M /3-4�/ V R. S. 88-34 PAR. 9 A psi-s
�p
Y PAR. $O /
3.464AC.
°� V O qa. kYo P. M. 91 - 19
/.06AC,"
zs:e. /.38 AC.
2.20•
Q , ryq�• {. .� ,vkyk Bb 'S?�39�Cn
2
10� o�I N BLK, 93 �J�•Tl n % P. M. 37-23 G�c.
�� � N Y 1 />9JS' r i ,63 °1 22,75• � - � 4G8' r
a yd:�'s- I PAR. / 9.97'
10 4.//4 AC.(C) w /1
9
\ � a 4.096AC.
_. ��
J 4.60 AC. = K\° ,�Y 7 P.-M. 34-30
A 48
P +
P.M. 6/-/0 > 397/ AC.(C) 6i •1
nsbsasai ,�5 47213'
P. M. 63-34
M NEWPORT CENTER .
SUB. tal pelOo� i
M /
N
02 Fgsr19
bh
1
MARCH 1970 NOTE ASSESSOR`S BLOCK & ASSESSOR'S MAP
/RV/NE SUB. M.M. /- 88 PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK 442PAGE 08 CD
TRACT NO. 60/5 M.M. 239-28 To 4//NCt.(sTREErs orvtr) SHOWN INC ES
PARCEL U4* P, M. 54- 23, 6/-)0,9/-)9 COUNTY OF ORANGE
SAVTA ROSA 08 SAN N/COL.:S
DR/VE DRIVE NIC 1
44��2
CENTER D9iL ` SEE RE/AND 2 AMPS
Ism fj° 23 F Et-
y a5, 01C E
P0¢� yy'y
TRACT Pais 0 �s
O �
T O
LOT 21 W \C� /�� = - '
/6.28/AC.(C) 200/
0y Boo •
P. M. 67- 2,3 a
o• �
PAR.2 a1 �• - -
3
14
6
K L69AC. `r LOT /7 R•3/ i•
PAR. `. �i ♦ i \` / // n�\♦ n.�'o (/ o -
13 ♦`�� \ / �� ( / ♦ ?oo / /ins) )♦♦ i > R
' cs16.3• /.568AC(C/`�. - v ♦\ % `�\ // \\ / O ♦/ �/ i/ �Z ♦" R/ S
U 1 i \` / �•/ 22 2 .�/ R//
` P �� / R 2\14.669AC(C^ vim`\!/ y�5 �N O i�h / 3s 0 ACEPA
10
20 i/// y 20 /p> /�^\\ / \♦ / \\y/ `\\ )i♦ ♦ / ' `y� \� °c. 1.02A
SANTA CRUZ 1968AC(CI /.e� / F /y E // \Y \`Ni /✓S� > i
DRIVE < / / G / / D
♦� / 8 / 7 `♦fin\ / 18.21AC. 63/ec.
• . . - PAR. 3 � - \ _ i i ♦ ` / - -
PAR.-3 v 19 �♦ i i Ay/-
I$ 6e- 4.8594C.0 PAR.2 'as <
/2.441 AC.(C) 1° 18 \ / 4// o ry
.. :o 2.263AC.(C/
LOT 18
t
- ' LOT IS - Ya Olaf c. Vo
d 3
ewO `09 ryo b tie
e� 75 48 NOTE- ASSESSORS. BLOCK 6
�61 2� ytiv PAR. / + tea' NO. 60/5 PARCEL NUMBERS
SHOWN /N CIRCLES
O��• 1.243AC(CJ e� T:• ze>c �� V' Zg/y
• 0-
T
MARCH /967 , sr S II z�er` q�ai oF�b cF2
5 Ise•._ 1 F �F
It
315,6�• �� 3Pi.39' �
JRACT /VO. 60/5 M.M. 239-28 T04/ /N . c6-/VT DRIVE ASSESSORS MAP O
ARCEL MAPS P.M. 67-2,3;75-48 F'`' • OI BOOK 442 PAGE 02
j - 14 pe COUNTY OF OF#GE
q �pt�0p�0 o��J
442-09
- - - : , = . _ -- - '- � - . = .. .. - .- ,_ . ��` - . ate.- ' . ' ' • � - . - � - _- � - -" = •- -
Itu
_ - 13' RV/NE
1942 aC
PA4 4 o s+so i
I/ 25-I c-ma
_ - PAR_ 11 BLK 091 93
tt
• - � - _ .. _-, - "_ l�s So - '. - •:z 3a � � 3_6T3 ;AG -- - ' } . - - - ,. ___ ._ - - - -
• iR
Zi
16 0
' .SUB o
16 .
AMR6/ 1970 NOTE-ASSESSOR'S BLOCK t3 ASSESSOR'S MAP
/RV/NE SUB. f /-88 O
AIQRCX /9T4-75 PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK442 PAGE 09
PARCEL MAPR P_ iL! 25-/ SHOWN IN CLES COUNTY OF ORANGE
• ���_ P_ M_ 60-36
44�8
R
zoo,
e4 Cq�
M1Q 23., d
aO V FOa
9 yo vPM. 54-23
m t O
r 10
P.M 2/-/8 m 2.048 AC(C) _
O -- °pAi
y am
O2sa Af R. 6z ea_ PM 27-43 . Q� zve.e S. 64-23 rr 8. >
QJ� Q3 R�P S. 88-34 zs;e. O hp" s A 6,
'_' PAR
P Os 09 _Q /
N 29 /
o- y 3't9 ^ ,\^; T.64 AC. I'7,,�
Y i2g4 ,
CST. J8 AC.
\ 001 mryZ06AC,
l \fig 9°
0
a;, 8LK.
c- � � n H z3c
s N d Y3 P. M. 37�23 G
1797S r I ,63. +/ 212 JS' m- 9IX 13.C2' V
n e ryb 6y ' PAR./ 9.97' O s
q 10 4.//4 D AC.(C)
p. o 4 9B/' 9^/ �b \ � N 4 25'R
4.096AC
a
ro� pv
V ° 7 e
4.80 AC. \ P\ ,fib P. M. 34-30 'c2 Ilk O 01
ry'
J p y O p(ibe
Q l
m 397/ AC(C)
ry�w a7z�3' as.01 se _ P.N. 61-10 > Gi
SANTA ROSA 15 a
i23, f
DRIVE xs R ti°' P. M. 63 -34 2
GENtER 0;OjvE SUB. N 0\Go/EI. 'Et �C C
16°.8a V 23 855.p4' !J O\J`
PO� �Z PAR. 4
TRACT le W
LOT 2/ /6.28/AC(C) r6O
tim °s K ASSESSOR'S MAP
ry s'
BOOK 442PAGE 08 O
P. M. 67 - 2,3
1 COUNTY Of ORANGE
9�p 3a)
PAR. 2
14
n� /0 ti
a
R 3
LOT /7
y
mp .. / 1.69 AC 'D
�\ 12
K 7 <
/
4 R
�
P '> r l3 S � '> t R_2 ANACAPA
63' \ ♦ / //NN v / - 22 `/ `� ,C // N ir f5h ars 10 DRIVE 2 021/ y O
\ � I
Nx
20 // H 20 /a / y/ / D i
/ 1968AC(C)/'�`°o- // F E
G /7
/A, %4\\ / c 1161
\ C /�\ 34). / nor 24 63�66
Y / / N
T 8 �\ i i �� 7 // .7 6 \\\ i B TN 1 /8.21AC
vi PAR. 3
/rj
19 • / /4' / / r O V
PAR.2 - -�r, ` q_/ / /PAR. 3 PAR. `� ,/ r r o
4/ �" -
o-
12 441 AC.(C) 2.263AC.(C)
a '
LOT /8 /
NOTE- ASSESSORS BLOCK
LOT l9 e.n PARCEL NUMBERS
/ 75 - 48 �/ bh;� " NO. 60/5
SHOWN /At CIRCLE
' S
PAR /
17
O
L243AC(C) 9 , ';. 2°'c2 451, o'Qr
I I a_ F�
t oc'
�5i S 23ae z ."'315 ASSESSORS MAP
1967 O
62' O 3pi 39
pRi� BOOK 442 PAGE 02
10. 6015 M.M. 239-28 TO4/ /N . CE/VTER o 01 COUNTY of ORA E
4AP5 PM 67-2,3;75-48
P
SPc Fe0�0`,�
0