Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTPO017 - 'COMMISSIONERS may 1984 MINUTES a o a City of Newport Beach ROLL CALL INDDC ae Permit No. 1581 (Amended) (Public Hearing) Item #4 Requ t to amend a previously approved use permit which UP #1581 Mpermit d the establishment of the Red Onion Restaurant .with on- le alcoholic beverages and live entertainment Continued so as to a w the expansion of the "net public area" to for the purpo of constructing a dance floor and to allow 5/24/84 dancing in conj ction with the existing live entertainment The proposal also eludes a request to pay an annual in- lieu fee to the City or all of the additional required off-street parking spa. s. LOCATION: Parcel No. of Parcel Map 57-25 (Resub- division No. ) located at 2406 Newport Boulevard, on th easterly side of Newport Boulevard, souther of 26th Street, on the Balboa Peninsula. ZONES: C-1 and C-2 APPLICANTS: Steve and Rick Loomis (The Re nion) , Newport Beach OWNER: Mrs. Jean Belden, Newport Beach Motion x Planning Commission continued this agenda item to its All Ayes meeting of May 24, 1984. A. Traffic Study (Public Hearing) Item #5 Request to approve a Traffic Study so as to allow the con- Traffic struction of 23,550 sq. ft. (net) of office space on Study property located in the C-O-H District, and the acceptance of an environmental document. Approved AND AND B. Resubdivision No. 776 (Public Hearing) Resub. 776 es t to resubdivide land into two parcels for commercial Approved office o ment and two parcels for private open space Condi- purposes. tionally -11- COMANSSIONERS1 010, 1984 0 MINUTES n 0 City Of NewWt Beach ROLL CALL INDEX LOCATION: A portion of Block 93, Irvine's Subdivi- sion, located at 1601 Avocado Avenue, on the westerly side of Avocado Avenue, between San Joaquin Hills Road, and San Nicholas Drive, in Newport Center. ZONES: C-O-H and 0-S APPLICANT: Albert J. Auer and Associates, Newport Beach OWNER: The Irvine Company, Newport- Beach ENGINEER: J.P. Kapp and Associates, Inc. , Tustin The public hearing was opened in connection with this item and Albert J. Auer, Applicant, 1127 Granville Drive, appeared before the Planning Commission. Mr. Auer des- cribed the proposed project and concurred with the Findings and Conditions of Approval recommended by staff. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Motion x Motion was made to approve the Traffic Study, subject to All Ayes the Findings contained in Exhibit "A", which MOTION CARRIED. Findings: 1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes jthe impact of the proposed project on the peak-hour traffic and circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City Policy S-1. 2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project- generated traffic will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic on any "major", "primary-modified", or "primary" street. 3. That an Initial Study and Negative Declaration have been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the State EIR Guidelines and City Policy. Based upon the information con- tained in the Initial Study and Negative Declaration, -12- COMMSSIONERS1 MWO, 1984 MINUTES :E City of Newpat Beach ROLE CAU INDE)C sufficient mitigation measures have been incorporated to reduce potentially significant environmental effects, and that the project will not result in significant environmental impacts. Motion x Motion was made for approval of Resubdivision No. 776, All Ayes subject to the Findings and Conditions contained in Exhibit "A", which MOTION CARRIED. Findings: 1. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City, all applicable general or specific plans and the Planning Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision. 2. That the proposed resubdivision presents no problems from a planning standpoint. 3. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. 4. That the proposed development will generate an increase in daily trips sufficient in magnitude to warrant a fair share assessment to mitigate the increased traffic congestion and traffic noise resulting from the cumula- tive affect of additional traffic generated by office development. i Conditions: 1. That a parcel map be filed. 2. That all improvements be constructed as required by ordinance and the Public Works Department. 3. That a standard subdivision agreement and accompanying surety be provided in order to guarantee satisfactory completion of the public improvements if it is desired to record a parcel map or obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public improvements. -13- COMMISSIONERS May , 1984 MINUTES . m n C' of NeNWt Beach ROLL CALL INDEX 4. That each building be served with an individual water service and sewer lateral connection to the public water and sewer systems unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. 5. That the on-site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be reviewed by the Traffic Engineer. 6. That provisions be made for ingress and egress over the adjacent parcels for access to the development prior to recordation of the parcel map.. 7. That all vehicular access rights to Avocado Avenue except for one drive entrance, be released and re- linquished, to the City of Newport Beach. 8. That the existing drive apron on Avocado Avenue be removed and replaced with curb, gutter and sidewalk and that all work be completed under an encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. 9. That a master plan of water, sewer and storm drain facilities be prepared for the on-site improvements prior to recording of the final map. Any modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain, water and sewer systems shown to be required by the study shall be the responsibility of the developer. 10. That an access ramp be constructed per City Std. 181-L at the intersection of San Nicholas Drive and Avocado Avenue, that displaced portions of sidewalk be reconstructed along Avocado Avenue and that all work be completed under an encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. 11. That the new drive entrance be a minimum of 28 feet in width with a curb return type drive approach. 12. That prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map, the Irvine Company shall provide the City with an agreement which will provide for the dedication of sufficient additional roadway rights-of-way in Avocado Avenue to provide for a separate right-turn lane into the development and an acceleration lane out of the development. This extra width is to be in addition to the right-of-way needed to construct travel lanes and a bike lane (if needed). ' -14- COMMISSIONERS May* 1984 MINUTES n 7C p s 0 a C of NeNWt Beach n + o ROLL CALL INDEX 13. That the applicant provide for a bicycle facility along Avocado Avenue in accordance with the provisions of the Master Plan of Bikeways currently being con- sidered in an upcoming General Plan Amendment. This may require widening the sidewalk by 4 to 6 feet, either reducing the parkway landscaping or providing additional easement for such a purpose. 14. Prior to the issuance of Building and Grading Permits, the applicant shall pay Fair-Share for circulation system improvements and noise walls as established by Ordinance to be adopted by the City. I 15. Development of the site shall be subject to a grading permit to be approved by the Building and Planning Departments. 16. That a grading plan, if required, shall include a com- plete plan for temporary and permanent drainage facilities, to minimize any potential impacts from silt debris, and other water pollutants. 17. The grading permit shall include, if required, a des- cription of haul routes, access points to the site, watering, and sweeping program designed to minimize impact of haul operations. 18. An erosion, siltation and dust control plan, if re- quired, shall be submitted and be subject to the approval of the Building Department and a copy shall be forwarded to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. 19. The velocity of concentrated run-off from the project shall be evaluated and erosive velocities controlled as part of the project design. 20. That grading shall be conducted in accordance with plans prepared by a Civil Engineer and based on recom- mendations of a soil engineer and an engineering geologist subsequent to the completion of a comprehen- sive soil and geologic investigation of the site. Per- manent reproducible copies of the "Approved as Built" grading plans on standard size sheets shall be fur- nished to the Building Department. -15- COMM5SKNRS1 J10, 1984 MINUTES r y s m c a E CL 0 n V, Newwt Beach S : o ROLL CAU INDD( 21. The following disclosure statement of the City of Newport Beach's policy regarding the John Wayne Airport shall be included in all leases or sub-leases for space in the project and shall be included in any Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions which may be recorded against any undeveloped site. DISCLOSURE STATEMENT The lessee, his heirs, successors and assigns, herein, ! acknowledge that: a) The John Wayne Airport may not be able to provide adequate air service for business establishments which rely on such service; b) When an alternate air facility is available, a com- plete phase out of jet service may occur at the John Wayne Airport; c) The City of Newport Beach will continue to oppose additional commercial area service expansions at the John Wayne Airport; d) Lessee, his heirs, successors and assigns, will not actively oppose any action taken by the City of New- port Beach to phase out or limit jet air service at the John Wayne Airport. 22. A landscape and irrigation plan for the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installa- tion of landscaping with the proposed construction schedule. (Prior to the occupancy of any structure, the licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accordance with the prepared plan) . 23. The landscape plan shall be subject to the review of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department and approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments. 24. That any roof-top or other mechanical equipment shall be sound attenuated in such a manner as to achieve a maximum sound level of 55 dBa at the property line. -16- COMANSSIONERS mayo, 1984 MINUTES r � � an x c)l ' of t Beach G ROLL CALL INDD( 25. That any mechanical equipment and emergency power generators shall be screened from view and noise associated with said installations shall be sound attenuated to acceptable levels in receptor areas. The latter shall be based upon the recommendations of a qualified acoustical engineer, and be approved by the Planning Department. 26. That prior to the issuance of building permits, the Fire Department shall review the proposed plans and may require automatic fire sprinkler protection. 27. The Fire Department access shall be approved by the Fire Department. 28. That all access to the buildings be approved by the Fire Department. 29. That all on-site fire protection (hydrants and Fire Department connections) shall be approved by the Fire and Public Works Departments. 30. A qualified archaeologist or paleontologist shall evaluate the site prior to commencement of construc- tion activities, and that all work on the site be done in accordance with the City's Council Policies K-5 and K-6. 31. All proposed development shall provide for vacuum sweeping of parking areas. 32. The project should be designed to conform to Title 24, Paragraph 6, Division T-20, Chapter 2, Sub-chapter 4 of the California Administrative Code dealing with energy requirements. 33. Final design of the project shall provide for the incorporation of water-saving devices for project lavatories and other water-using facilities. 34. That the lighting system shall be designed and main- tained in such a manner as to conceal the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adja- cent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a Licensed Electrical Engineer; with a letter from the Engineer stating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been met. -17- i 1 1 TRAFFIC PHASING ANALYSIS 1 1 1 AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT AUER DEVELOPMENT 1 1 1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 1 1 1 DECEMBER9 1983 1 TNT FC ENGM EAMi6 ®M�M CONlUlTANTS kN/MrW and E*s.kc 1 ' 1 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ® erman CONSULTANTS Kimmel and Associates , Inc. ' 3300 IRVINE AVENUE, SUITE 180, NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92660 (714)546.9814 December 1, 1983 ' City of Newport Beach Community Service Department 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, Calif. 92663 ' Attention Fred Talarico Avocado Office Project Traffic Phasing Analysis City of Newport Beach Gentlemen: ' The planned Auer Development, Avocado Office Project, has been analyzed in accordance with the Citys ' "Traffic Phasing ordin- ance" . The intersections analyzed are those identified as critical locations by Richard M. Edmonston, Newport Beach Traffic Engineer. Project Description The planned office site is located on Avocado Avenue between San Joaquin Hills Road and San Nicholas Drive, within the "Newport Center" area (see Location Map) . The office development is pro- posed to contain 23 ,550 square feet of building area. Access is from Avocado Drive, San Joaquin Hills Road, and San Nicholas Drive. The project is anticipated to have occupancy in 1986 . ' Traffic Generation and Distribution ' Traffic generation rates for office uses , as established by the Citys ' Traffic Engineer, are as follows: Average Daily Traffic Generation Rate = 13 T.E.*/1000 S.F. Project Average Daily Traffic Volume = 13 x 23 .55 = 306 T.E. ' Total 2.5 Hour Generation Rate = 4 . 6 T.E./1000 S .F. Total Project 2 .5 Hour Volume = 4 .6 x 23 .55 = 108 T.E. Inbound 2.5 Hour Generation Rate = 1.2 T.E./1000 S .F. Inbound Project 2.5 Hour Volume = 1 . 2 x 23 .55 = 28 T.E. i 1 Page 2 Dec. 1, 1983 Newport Beach ' Outbound 2.5 Hour Generation Rate = 3 .4 T.E./1000 S.F. Outbound Project 2.5 Hour Volume = 3.4 x 23.55 = 80 T.E. 1 Peak Hour Generation Rate Equals 50% of 2.5 Hour Rates 1 *T.E. (Trip End) = A trip end is the arrival or departure of a vehicle at the project site . 1 Exhibit 1 shows the percentage of total site traffic volumes that will use each major street serving the project. It is estimated 1 that 10% of the traffic will circulate internally within the "Newport Center" area. 1 Intersection Analysis 1% Test The critical intersections , identified by the City as requiring 1 a 1% analysis, include: Coast Highway @ Orange 1 @ Prospect @ Balboa/Superior @ Riverside @ Dover/Bayshore 1 @ Bayside @ Jamboree @ Avocado 1 @ MacArthur @ Goldenrod @ Marguerite 1 Jamboree @ Santa Barbara @ San Joaquin Hills @ Eastbluff/Ford 1 @ Bison @ Eastbluff N. @ MacArthur MacArthur @ San Miguel @ San Joaquin Hills @ Ford @ Bison Bristol @ Jamboree 1 Bristol N. @ Jamboree 1 San Joaquin Hills @ Santa Cruz @ Santa Rosa 1 . 1 ' Page 3 Dec. 1, 1983 Newport Beach ' Existing and projected 2 .5 hour traffic volumes, for each inter- section, are shown on attached forms . Regional traffic increases, ' for a three year period, were calculated from factors shown on Table 1. Traffic from other approved development was provided by the City Traffic Department. This traffic generation is based on development and occupancy shown on Table 2. The analysis indicates that all intersections, except MacArthur ' at San Miguel and Jamboree Road at San Joaquin Hills Road, will have project traffic volumes below 1% of the total of other traffic shown on attached forms . I.C.U. Test ' Intersection capacity utilization (I.C.U. ) was calculated for the intersections of MacArthur Boulevard at San Miguel Drive and Jamboree Road at San Joaquin Hills Road. Peak hour volumes from other approved development was provided by the City Traffic Depart- ment (see attached I.C.U. form) . The resulting I.C.U. will be less than a vehicle capacity ratio ' of 0 .90 before and after traffic increase from the planned office project. ' Interior Site Analysis Exhibit 2 shows site location and planned access locations . No ' formal site plan is available at this time. The proposed access entrance, fronting Avocado Avenue, will allow only right turns in and out, since Avocado Avenue at this location is , and will continue to be, one-way southbound. When a site plan becomes available, it should be reviewed to ' determine if sufficient street width is available to provide a separate right turn deceleration and acceleration lane for future implementation of the Avocado Avenue one-way couplet. Conclusions ' Project traffic at all intersections, except MacArthur Boulevard at San Miguel Drive and Jamboree Road at San Joaquin Hills Road, will be less than 1% of the total volume. An I.C.U. calculation ' for MacArthur Boulevard at San Miguel Drive and Jamboree Road at San Joaquin Hills Road resulted in a vehicle/capacity ratio below 1 Page 4 ' Dec. 1, 1983 Newport Beach ' 0 . 90 , before and after traffic increase from the proposed office project. If you have any questions or need additional data, please con- tact our office. Respectfully submitted, HERMAN KIMMEL & ASSOC. , INC. 1� V�- 13 H. William Dickson, P.E. RCE No. 19417 RTR No. 39 ��- sG`A"Y°" PROJECT ~ LOCATION ff\ CI c A2. � nt � qn PLAZA �U PNA7A J� INSURANCE N J IMAIC! \v/ 1T G lam' ` , u- 1� I.�I tw>eon VIEW HILLS fA -DESIGN z 1/7 PLAZA -►,\ 0611 aB WVIhL CUA11 l:WNllif ClUll \ 4 rFF\\\\\` p'�}t`11r1 f J�� 111 JA 1 CORPORATE PLAZA.—, it NL W VOOT Y.IY,{LWSII4IM41 xAl . .. . . ._—.._ _ � IxvIN¢tLlnuee oE- o' NOW PORT OI-CENTER NO �i� °w' '""`°'~ LOCATION MAP ' TABLE 1 REGIONAL TRAFFIC EXISTING CONDITION ' Coast Highway ' East City Limit 25% MacArthur Blvd 18% Jamboree Road 7% Dover Drive 12% ' West City Limit MacArthur Boulevard Coast Highway 8% San Joaquin Hills Road 5% Jamboree Road 2% ' North City Limit Jamboree Road ' Coast Highway 2% MacArthur Blvd 5% ' North City Limit ' Irvine Avenue/ Campus Drive Santiago 20% Bristol Street (N & S) 35% MacArthur ' Bristol Street & Bristol Street North ' Jamboree Road 18% Irvine Avenue/ Campus Drive ' Annual Growth Rate for Regional Traffic* Present to 1983 2.4% 1984 to 1988 2.3% * From Orange County Administrative Office ' Forecast Analysis Center I TABLE 2 Traffic phasing ordinance report on approved project volumes: Proj. Approved Volume is ' No. All Projects on File Weighted by 001 Hughes Aircraft 81 100%, occupancy 002 Hoag Hospital 000% occupancy 003 Far West Savings 6 Loan 100% occupancy ' 004 Pacesetter Homes 000% occupancy 005 Aeronutronic Ford 008% occupancy 006 Back Bay Office 000% occupancy 007 Boyle Engineering 100% occupancy ' 008 Cal Canadian Bank 100% occupancy 009 Civic Plaza 035% occupancy O10 Corporate Plaza 0308 occupancy Oil Roll Center Newport 000% occupancy 012 Campus/MacArthur 025% occupancy ' 013 National Education Office 000% occupancy 014 North Ford 000% occupancy 015 Orchard Office 1008 occupancy 016 Pacific Mutual Plaza 075% occupancy 017 3701 Birch Office 100% occupancy 018 Newport Place 058% occupancy 019 Shokrian 000% occupancy 020 Bank of Newport 100% occupancy 021 Bayside Square 100% occupancy ' 022 Sea Island 000% occupancy 023 Haywood Apartments 000% occupancy 024 Harbor Point Homes 000% occupancy 025 Roger's Gardens 100% occupancy ' 026 Seaview Lutheran Plaza 100% occupancy 027 Rudy Baron 000% occupancy 028 Quail Business Center 100% occupancy 029 411 Newport Blvd. 100% occupancy ' 030 Martha's Vineyard 000% occupancy 031 Valdez 000% occupancy 032 Coast Business Center 000% occupancy 033 Roll Center Npt No. 1 TPP 000% occupancy 034 See Projects 340 to 343 000% occupancy 035 Ross Mollard 000% occupancy 036 Banning/Newport Ranch 000% occupancy 038 Park Lido 000% occupancy 039 Hughes Aircraft M2 000% occupancy 040 Heritage Bank 000% occupancy 041 Flagship Hospital 000% occupancy 042 Big Canyon 10 000% occupancy 043 Fun Zone 000% occupancy 044 Marriott Hotel 000% occupancy ' 045 St. Andrews Church 000% occupancy 046 YMCA 000% occupancy 047 Allred Condos 000% occupancy 048 Morgan Development 000% occupancy ' 049 Four Seasons Hotel 000% occupancy 051 Block 400 Medical 000% occupancy 052 Sheraton Expansion 000% occupancy 053 See Projects 530 to 533 000% occupancy 054 Amend No. 1 McArthur Court 000% occupancy ' 055 National Education (RVSD) 000% occupancy 056 Amendment No. 2 Ford Aero 000% occupancy 340 Amendment No. 1 Ford Aero 100% occupancy 341 Amendment No. 1 Ford Aero 000% occupancy ' 342 Amendment No. 1 Ford Aero 000% occupancy 343 Amendment No. 1 Ford Aero 000% occupancy 530 Amendment No. 1 North Ford 000% occupancy 531 Amendment No. 1 North Ford 000% occupancy 532 Amendment No. 1 North Ford 000% occupancy ' 533 Amendment No. 1 North Ford 000% occupancy 1 10 30 1 8�'i Jh 10 10 sr to 1 30 1 NO SCALE O PERCENT IDIRECTIONAL 1 TRAFFIC VOLUME 1 TRAFFIC 15 DISTRIBUTION 1 m� a AVODO O EGT OFFICE s R49. � 54ti � PROJECT ���'� 1 15 ¢� ROOM � .0O 7 1 15 CaznNv�Lie 9R 10 P 20 25 5 i 20 40 10 10 N /%. 20 1 CO i 5 r 1 TRIFFK CMOINEERING �� �r.TM"^d'u ••.M. 5 EXHIBIT 1 i SAN JOAQUIN HILLS ROAD ' MEDIAN ♦ I o NO SCALL EX/,Jl/�f/G Z ' Zv/ ♦ ACCESS 'DIRECTION C J O ' 7Q ' SAN NICOLAS ..,,� DRIVE SITE LOCATION 3 t E K NGI N E TRfFLTANT Rrn6 EXHIBIT 2 FNERl�fl CO kimn»I end Assxlnss.r,c ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MacArthur B1. / San Miguel Dr. — (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected ' Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 215 Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 1634 9 418 2061 21 1 Southbound 2834 16 '424 3274 33 7 Eastbound 1286 _ 224 1510 15 28* Westbound 533 _ _ 64 547 -,r. 6 3 Project Traffic is estimated to be• less than 1% of Projected Peak 21� Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected * Q Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE: December 1, 1983 PROJECT: AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT • FOR;! I ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' Intersection MacArthur 81. / San Miguel Dr. ( Existing Traffic Volumes Bases on Average Daily 'Traffic Winter/Spring 1933 ) EXIST. EXIST. REGIONAL COWITTED PROJECTED Novewent EXISTING PROPOSED PX.HR. V/C GROWTH PROJECT V/C Ratio PROJECT PROJECT Lanes Cap. Lanes Cap. Vol. Ratio Volume Volume w/o Project Volume V/C Ratio Volume NL 1600 35 .0219* - 4 .0244* 1 .02500 NT 3200 498 .1922 5 175 .2575 - .2575 ' NR 117 - 29 - SL 1600 5 .0031 0 .0031 .0031 ' ST 3200 1202 .4019* 8 196 .4691* - . 4703* SR 84 11 4 ' EL 3200 288 .0900 = 43 .1034 10 .1066 ET 3200 178 .1084* 48 .1291* 2 .1304* ER 169 - 18 2 ' WL 1600 100 .0625* - 13 .0701* _ .0701* WT -3200 66 .0225 - 11 .0241 2 .0247 ' WR I I I - 0 - YELLOWTIME .1000* 1 1 1 1 ' EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION .6947 EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH W/PROPOSED INPROVEMENTS I.C.U. .7927 i .10 00* ' EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH PLUS PROJECT I.C.U. 7 9 771 ' ® Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 ❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 ❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. with systems improvement will be ' less thanorequalto0.90_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ' Description of system improvement: ' DATE: Dec. 1, 1983 PROJECT AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT . FORM II 1 1 1 1% Traffic Volume Analysis 1 Intersection Jamboree Rd. / San Joaquin Hills Rd.— (Existing Traffic Volumes basedon Average inter pring 19 1 Peak 2h Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected It of Projected Project Direction Peak 21, Hour Growth Peak 211 Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2y Hour j Peak 2� Hour Volume Volume Volum Volume Volume Volume 1 Northbound 2167 3 401 2571 26 — 1 Southbound 4697 1 7 1599 5303 53 4 Eastbound 466 7 473 I 5 1 Westbound 556 379 935 9 12* t 1 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected ED Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected *Q Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. i 1 • 1 . r 1 1 i .. DATE: Dec. 1,1983 1 PROJECT: AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT FORM I ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS ' Intersection Jamboree Rd. / San Joaquin Hills Rd. ( Existing Traffic Volumes Bases on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 19,d ' EXIST. EXIST. REGIONAL COMMITTED PROJECTED Movement EXISTING PROPOSED PK.HR. V/C GROWTH PROJECT V/C Ratio PROJECT PROJECT Lanes Cap. Lanes Cap. Vol. Ratio Volme Vol me w/o Project VOlune V/C Ratio Voluft NL 1600 102 .0638* 2 .0651* _ . 0651* NT 4800 870 .1813 3 188 .2211 .2211 ' NR 1600 106 .0663 - 13 .0744 - .0744 SL 3200 534 .1669 82 .1925 2 .1931 ST 3200 1404 .4389* 7 215 .5061* _ .5061* SR 1600 193 .1206 0 .1206 .1206 ' EL 86 = O = ET 4800 40 .0262* 0 .0268* .0268* ER N.S. 60 - 3 - ' WL 150 - 24 WT 4800 62 .0441* 0 .0491* - .0491* WR 160Q 34 .0213 - 169 .1269 6 .1307 . : YELLOWTIME 1000* t EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION r .6730 j .1 0 0 0* 11 � EXISTING PLUS C"ITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH W/PROPOSED INPROYEMENTS I.C.U. i * ' EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GR0WTH PLUS PROJECT I.C.U. 1.7471. ' * ® Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 ❑ 'Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will big greater than 0.90 ❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. with systems improvement will be ' less thanorequalto0.90- - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' Description of system improvement: ' DATE: Dec. 1, 1983 PROJECT AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT FORM II 'I ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis ' Intersection Coast Ha./Orange Ave. — (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on Average Winter/Spring ' Peak 211 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 10. of Projected Project Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 211 Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound P11 _ 0 211 2 - Southbound 132 _ 0 132 1 - Eastbound 2802 24 660 3486 I 35 6 ' westbound 4723 AO 1015 5778 T58 16 a Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 21, Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 1 PROJECT: AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT DATE: Dec. 1 1983 FORM I 1 1 1% Traffic Volume Analysis 1 Intersection Coast Hwy./Prospect Ave. — (Existing Traffic Volumes se on Average inter pring 19 Peak 211 Hour Approved P Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected I Project Direction Peak 2+s Hour Growth Peak 21% Hour Peak 21i Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume 1 Northbound 113 0 113' 1 ! — 1 Southbound 215 — 0 215 2 — Eastbound 2882 25 660 3567 36 6 ' 1 Westbound 5159 _ 44 1015 6218 62 16 ® Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. 1 i 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 - DATE: Dec. 1, 1983 PROJECT: AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT FOP„4 I' L II 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast Hwy./Balboa B1 .-Su erior Ave. (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average winter/spring 1983_ Peak 21, Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2y Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 1495 - 74 1569 16 - Southbound 2655 _ • 140 2795 28 - Eastbound 3196 27 778 4003 40 6 ' Mestbound 3516 30 801 4347 43 d 16 © Project Traffic is estimated to be.less than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected 1 (] Peak 2; Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. DATE: Dec. 1, 1983 PROJECT: AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast Hwy./Riverside Ave. r (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring _ Peak 2k Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 10. of Projected Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2's Hour Peak 2s Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Vol ome Volume Northbound 38 — 0 38 1 — Southbound 1243 — 58 1301 13 — Eastbound 4509 39 940 5488 I 55 ; 6 '' Nestbound 4834 — 41 972 5847 T58 ! 16 ® Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected [] Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE: Dec. 1. 1983 PROJECT: AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast Hwy./Dover Dr.-Bayshore Dr. (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pring 83 Peak 21s Hour Approved T Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected ; Project Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2§ Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2� Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 236 1 237 2 1 — southbound 2655 — 63 2718 27 Eastbound 4025 34 918 4977 50 ; 6 Westbound 6191 31 957 7179 72 16 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 2; Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE: Dec. 1, 1983 PROJECT:AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast Hwy. / Bayside Dr. — (Existing Traffic Volumes basedon Average inter pring 19 Peak 2;2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected ! Project Direction Peak 2ms Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2, Hour j Peak 2� Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume m Northbound 1481 - 16 1497 15 - Southbound 155 — 0 155 2 — Eastbound 5312 27 866 6205 62 6 i Westbound 6054 —_30 853 6937 1 169 16 © Project Traffic is estimated to be.less than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. I j DATE: Dec . 1, 1983 PROJECT: AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT FORM I I ! 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast Hwy. / Jamboree Rd. — (Existing Traffic VolU5isi-Fa—sed on Average inter pring 19 Peak 2y Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1� of Projected Project Direction Peak 2)1 Hour Growth Peak 2)S Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2y Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume jNorthbound _ 4 933 9 — 929 - southbound 4167 6 491 4664 47 IEastbound 3899 20 888 4807 48 6 Westbound 3759 _19 501 4279 43 16 © Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2-1-2Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. I T 1 I 1 1 DATE: Dec. 1, 1983 PROJECT: AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT FORM I 1 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast Hwy. / Avocado Ave. (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 _ Peak 21s Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 10. of Projected Project Direction Peak 211 Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 24 Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume i Northbound 442 — 109- 541 5 - southbound 27 — 48 1 75 1 1 - Eastbound 049 16 529 3594 36 - Westbound 3363 381 3761 38 - ■ © Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected j Peat 2k Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected [] Peak 2-2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. I ' l I . DATE: Dec. 1 1983 PROJECT: AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT FORM I I .. ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast Hwy. / MacArthur 81 . — (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring I Peak 24 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1� of Projected Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2; Hour Peak 2+ Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2u, Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound Out Dun 2510 14 •451 2975 30 4 Eastbound 3326 43 630 3999 40 — Westbound I 2957 53 530 3540 35 1.. a Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected [] Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. I . I • I I t • I DATE: Dec. 1, 1983 PROJECT: AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT FORM I ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast Hwy. / Goldenrod Ave. (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pring 83 1 Peak 2k Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected Iv. of Projected Project Direction Peak 2+ Hour Growth Peak 211 Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2y Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume m Northbound 231 — 8 239 3 ! — Southbound 205 0 205 2 — Eastbound 4602 82 800 5484 55 4 1 Westbound 2858 —_51 501 3410 34 1 T• 1 a Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected ' [] Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 1 I I m I DATE: Dec 1 1983 PROJECT: AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT FORM I 1 1% Traffic Volume Analysis I Intersection Coast Hwy. / Marguerite Ave. — (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 Peak 21% Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected Iv. of Projected Project Direction Peak 21s Hour Growth Peak 211 Hour Peak 2's Hour Peak 2�- Hour Peak 2y Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume i Volume iNbrthbound 616 _ 3 619 6 — Southbound 719 8 727 7 Eastbound 4023 72 801 4896 I 49 4 Westbound 2556 533 3135 —,.31 1 I 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be.less than 1% of Projected Peak 2; Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. 1 I t 1 • DATE: Dec. 1, 1983 PROJECT: AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT FORM I i ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Bristol St. / Jamboree Rd. — (Existing Traffic Volumes based on AverageWinter7Yp—r-5`gTFMT Peak 2)1 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 10. of Projected Project Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 29 Hour Peak 2y Hour i Peak 2� Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume 1 Northbound 5362 8 722 6142 61 I 12 South bound 1703 2 365 2070 21 1 Eastbound 5499 1 71 784 6354 , 64 8 1 Westbound _-- 0 _-- _-- --- 1 © Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected [� Peak 21-. Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 1 • I 1 I t DATE: Dec. 1, 1983 PROJECT: AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT FORM I I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis 1 Intersection Bristol St. N. Jamboree Rd. (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pring 9 _ 1 Peak 2k Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1. of Projected Project Direction Peak 211 Hour Growth Peek 211 Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 2, Hour Peak 2� Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volune 1 . Northbound 5705 9 772 6486 65 12 soutnbound 2707 4 • 369 3080 31 1 ' Eastbound Mestbound 1531 20 180 1731 17 ' 14 © Pr6ject Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE: Dec. 1, 1983 PROJECT: AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT FORA I r r r1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Jamboree Rd. / Santa Barbara Dr. — (Existing Traffic Volumes se on Average inter pring 19 r Peak 2y Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected ! Project Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 24 Hour Peak 2� Hour � Peak 2y Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Vol ure Northbound 2165 3 349 2517 25 — Southbound 3511 6 -484 4001 40 — rEastbound i Westbound 1625 269 1894 T19 — r a Project Traffic is estimated to be• less than 1% of Projected Peak 2-11 Hour Traffic Volume r Q Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2; Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. r r _ 1 1 I • 1 .. ' DATE: Dec. 1 1983 PROJECT: AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT FOnM I III i 1% Traffic Volume Analysis 1 Intersection Jamboree Rd / Eastbluff Dr.-Ford Rd. (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pang 8 Peak 2h Hour Approved 1 I Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1S, of Projected I Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 24 Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound I 4106 7 705 4818 48 ! 12 Southbound 3898 6 . 595 4499 45 4 Eastbound 1213 — 4 1217 , 12 — ' Westbound 796 —' 0 796 8 — ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 23-2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 19A� ' PROJECT: AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis ' Intersection Jamboree Rd. / Bison Ave. _ (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 ' Peak 211 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction i Peak 2)s Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 21,, Hour Peak 21s Hour j Peak '2y Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Northbound I 4216 7 695 4918 49 12 ' I Southbound 3758 6 •752 4516 45 4 Eastbound 198 — 0 198 i 2 — i, Westbound 583 _ _ 67 650 7 — Q Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 23, Hour Traffic Volume ' ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2', Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. F DATE: Dec. 1, 1983 PROJECT: AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT FOR;1 I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Jamboree Rd. / Eastbluff Dr. N. (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 83 Peak 211 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected I Project Direction Peak 2+ Hour Growth Peak 21s Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 2h Hour ' Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 4524 8 737 5269 53 12 Southbound 5080 9 866 5955 1 60 4 Eastbound 468 — 0 468 5 — + Westbound 54 54 1 — © Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. r � DATE• Dec. 1, 1983 PROJECT: AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT FORK ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Jamboree B1. / MacArthur B1 . — (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring Peak 21s Hour Approved I Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume 1 I Northbound 1632 3 421 2056 21 2 Southbound 3086 11 •654 3751 1 38 3 i Eastbound 1895 3 285 2183 22 3 ' Westbound 1 3320 210 3542 35 14 ® Prdject Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2, Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected [] Peak 2, Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. DATE- PROJECT: AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT FORM I ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MacArthur B1 . / San Joaquin Hills Rd. ' (Existing Traffic Vol—um--e—sEased on Average Winter/Spring 83 Peak 2y Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction ( Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 231 Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2> Hour Peak 2k Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 1789 10 435 2234 22 20 Southbound 3502 13 •606 1 4121 41 10 Eastbound 1889 — 400 2289 22 16 Westbound 900 — — 62 962 10 1 a Project Traffic is estimated to be. less than 1% of Projected Peak Zs Hour Traffic Volume ' a Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2= Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization ' (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. ' DATE: Dec. 1 1983 PROJECT: AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT 1% Traffic Volume Analysis ' Intersection MacArthur Bl . / Ford Rd. (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 83 Peak 211 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 2y Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 3086 11 730 3827 38 28 southbound 5045 19 •618 1 5682 57 10 Eastbound 919 _ I 0 919 9 - ' Hestbound 1056 — 0 1056 11 - a Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization ' (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. ' DATE: Dec. 1, 1983 PROJECT: AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT FO.^.'r 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection MacArthur Bl . / Bison Ave. (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 1983 Peak 2y Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected It of Projected f Project Direction Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2� Hour Peak 2$ Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 2y Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ' Volume Northbound 4096 15 730 4841 48 28 sorthbound 5400 20 •768 1 6188 62 10 Eastbound 958 I — 107 1065 11 — Westbound --- i ---- _� 0 --- --- ' Q Pr6ject Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2; Hour Traffic Volume ' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2; Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. DATE: Dec 1 1983 PROJECT: AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT FO^M ; r r r1% Traffic Volume Analysis r Pntersection San Joaquin Hills Rd. / Santa Cruz-Big Canyon (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pring 19 83 ) _ r Peak 2's Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2y Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volune Northbound 892 _ 584 1476 15 r Southbound 245 - . 12 257 3 - Eastbound 1738 - 191 1929 ! 20 4 rWestbound 1531 _ _ 144 1675 17 12 r 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2= Hour Traffic Volume ' ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2; Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. 1 1 r r • r r DATE: Dec. 1, 1983 PROJECT: AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT FORM I ' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection San Joaquin Hills Rd. / Santa Rosa - Big Canyon (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring _ ' Peak 21s Hour Approved , Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected i% of Projected i Project Direction Peak 2§ Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 2y hour ' Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound I 1291 — 95 1386 14 12 Southbound 294 — & 302 3 — Eastbound 1258 — 309 1567 ! 16 4 Westbound 945 — 202 1147 4 ' 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2; Hour Traffic Volume ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 21-2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization ' (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. y I , DATE: Dec 1 1983 PROJECT: AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT t n 02-219- r � NAME PHONE APPLICANT: CONSULTANTS: H-CII12 Al DATE DEPOSIT FEES PAYMENT REMAINING BALANCE • �f la�5 1075 ....��._ - -.�..r._-- _ _� �_ r �_..�.�r.�..��._ : ._r..r �� �p,WPORT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH RECEIPT tD� d NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92663 No. 41840 !1Q4O 19 DATE RECEIVED RECEIVED F OM //�1 - . I ,.�- r,��fi��lly�l,�, e �r��r1 /�� 1 FOR: O/Af W6wz4e z r! � - �/!"4 Vw 4 t!'iy ACCOUNT NO. AMOUNT ' i ,ao 2F16� - } 0 _ B9 /Z5-, a b DEPARTMENT By yr'Wv I 4 y J CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH i DEMAND FOR PAYMENT Date January 3, 1984 Demand of: Herman Kimmel and Associates, Inc. Address: 3300 Irvine Avenue, Suite 180 Newport Beach, California 92660 'In the amount of $ 950.00 ITEM OF EXPENDITURE BUDGET # AMOUNT Professional services rendered re Avocado Office Project - Traffic Phasing Analysis - A. J. Auer Site 02-219-12 Invoice 83-98.1 TOTAL $950.00 Approved For Payment: r Depart ent Hea A u and Approved: • Finance Director 7, s. -- ,ram. . _ - •z,, ;-� INVOICE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING �� Depe�n�ng D ® Merman CONSULTANTS DFC MBnr Kimmel and Associates, Inc. 6 N acid OP r983p,- 33001RVINE AVENUE.SUITE 160.NEWPORT BEACH.CA 92660 �RTecc-- (714)546.9514 Invoice: 83-98 .1 Date: D� er 15 , 983 ' V � Client: City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Purchase Order No.: Newport Beach, Ca. 92663 Requested By:Fred Talarico HOURS AMOUNT AVOCADO OFFICE PROJECT Traffic Phasing Analysis Albert J. Auer Site Preparation of Study $ 850 00 Reproduction 100 '00 AMOUNTIDUE $ 950- 00 ACCOUNT NO. 2— MOUNT ' l_ 60 , DALE AWROVED F E% k., yA '