The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTPO053_BALBOA ASSOCIATES TP0053 Draft BALBOA/WASHINGTON TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE ANALYSIS Prepared for, City of Newport Beach Prepared by: Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. 1450 North Tustin Avenue, Suite 108 Santa Ana, California 92701 January 17, 1989 CONTENTS Pare Project Description 1 Trip Generation and Distribution 1 Traffic Impacts Conclusion l l Appendix n• ttt PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed residential and retail site is located on the southwest corner of Balboa Boulevard and Washington Street. The project consists of five single family attached units as the second floor of the two-story project and 4,444 square feet of retail uses as the first floor. The project site is currently comprised of a restaurant and parking lot. Figure I illustrates the location of the project site, and Figure 2 illustrates the proposed site plan. Access to the proposed project will be provided by an existing alley located off of Washington south of Balboa. Adjacent to the project site, Washington is a one-way street northbound. Covered parking for the residential portion will be provided for ten vehicles and off-street parking for the retail uses will be provided for 18 vehicles. Coast Highway is a regional east-west arterial through the City of Newport Beach. North-south regional access to the study area is from Newport Boulevard (SR-55), which connects to several freeways to the north providing access to Orange County and beyond. South of Coast Highway, Newport Boulevard enters , the Balboa area where the highway terminates at Balboa Boulevard. Balboa Boulevard terminates within the peninsula area and provides the only direct route into and out of the peninsula. TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION Appropriate trip generation rates for the proposed land uses were obtained from the City of Newport Beach peak hour generation rates for attached medium density dwelling units and for retail uses. For attached medium density homes, the City of-Newport Beach has derived an inbound rate of 0.2 trips/DU and an outbound rate of 0.4 trips/DU for a total of 0.6 trips/DU in the AM peak hour. In the PM peak hour, the City has derived an inbound rate of U trips/DU and an outbound rate of 0.3 trips/DU for a total of 0.8 trips/DU for attached medium 1 4 SO F o ¢ U m z u z 0 S x a 19TH 17TH _ e` o Qom" ISTH � 0 0 � o N R- �y NA Upp COAST HWY 3yryp $ o eA�pf �aG eALQpA yTP PROJECT LOCATION Figure 1 PROJECT LOCATION r 490AUSTIN•POUST ASSOCIATES. INC. f:,115!'G GU A'i BALBOABLVD 112j �F5 � 1 607 •1 609 611 673 616 N w U U L � _ uY r.21 5 1 1 1_$1 Ili.ea 2a' 8'' I 2+'- ALLEY - Figure 2 PROPOSED SITE PLAN -R GOAUSTIN-POUST ASSOCIATES, INC. �h density homes. For retail uses, the City has derived an AM peak hour inbound rate of 0.7 trips/TSF and an AM peak hour outbound rate of 0.5 trips/TSF for a total AM peak hour rate of 1.2 trips/TSF. In the PM peak hour, the City has derived an inbound retail rate of 1.5 trips/TSF and an outbound retail rate of 2.0 trips/TSF for a total retail rate of 3.5 trips/TSF. These rates and the resulting project trip generation are summarized in Table 1. As the summary indicates, the proposed project will generate eight trips in the AM peak hour and 20 trips in the PM peak hour. The restaurant currently at the project site is not generating traffic; therefore, the proposed project is not given any credit for existing traffic generated at the project site. The trip generation was factored to obtain a peak 2.5 hour volume for the AM and PM peak periods. The peak 2.5 hour volumes were based on an estimated factor of 2.0 to account for the extension of the usual one-hour peak period. is Distribution of project generated traffic was derived from observed travel patterns in the vicinity of the project site as well as from locations and levels of development in relation to the location of the proposed project. The general trip distribution is illustrated in Figure 3. An estimated 45% of project traffic is assumed to travel north along Newport Boulevard to the Newport Freeway (SR-55) and out of the study area. Along Coast Highway, 20% of project traffic is assumed to travel west out of the study area, and 30% is expected to travel east out of the study area. Five percent of project traffic is expected to remain in the area of the project site and will not impact any of the study intersections. 4 i TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY - - AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR LAND USE IB OB TOTAL IB 08 TOTAL Attached Mediun Density 5 DU Hourly Trip Rate 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.8 Hourly Trip Generation 1 2 3 2 2 4 Retail 4.444 TSF Hourly Trip Rate 0.7 0.5 1.2 1.5 2.0 3.5 7 9 16 Hourly Trip Generation 3 2 5 4 HOURLY TOTAL 4 8 9 11 20. 2.5 HOUR TOTAL 8 8 16 18 22 40 5 II oe" J� o 459.� � HOSPITAL f45x lox 20% h� 75%1 307.E 75% hq tloo w% ox COAST HWY f757. m 32M0 757 eq rS,oe 0 sx " 0 Eq�ep.4 �Q5 Figure 3 TRIP DISTRIBUTION ® FAUSTIN•FOUST ASSOCIATES, INC. Yd I TRAFFIC IMPACTS The City of Newport Beach identified six intersections for analysis to determine the impact of the proposed development. These intersections are: Newport Blvd./32nd St. Newport Blvd./Via Lido Newport Blvd./Hospital Rd. Coast Hwy./Balboa Blvd.-Superior Av. Coast Hwy./Riverside Av. Coast Hwy./Tustin Av. The 1988 peak 2.5 hour volumes were provided for each intersection by the City staff. Since the project is expected to be completed by 1989, the ambient growth rate for regional arterials was applied to the existing 1988 volumes to reflect 1990 traffic conditions one year after the completion date. A growth rate of one percent per year was added to all volumes along Newport Boulevard north of Coast Highway and along Coast Highway east of Newport Boulevard. A factor of 2.5 percent per year was added to all volumes along Coast Highway west of Newport Boulevard. The peak 2.5 hour volumes of all approved projects, also provided by the City of Newport Beach, were added to the peak 2.5 hour volumes. ,The resulting volumes represent the projected peak 2.5 hour volumes prior to the addition of project traffic. A list of approved projects is given in Table 2. One percent of the projected peak 2.5 hour volumes of each approach of each intersection was compared with the peak 2.5 hour distributed volumes from the proposed project. A summary of this comparison is shown in Table 3. If one percent of the 1990 peak 2.5 hour volumes of each approach were larger than the peak 2.5 hour project volumes, no further analyses were required. If project peak 2.5 hour volumes were higher than one percent of the projected peak 2.5 hour volumes at any approach 53 TABLE 2 APPROVED PROJECTS SUMMARY PROJECT NAME PERCENT COMPLETED Hughes Aircraft it 100% Far West Savings and Loan 100% Acronutronic Ford so% Back Bay Office 100% Boyle Engineering 1100% Cal Canadian Bank 100% Civic Plaza 75% Corporate Ptaza 30% Koll Center Newport 100% MacArthur Court 32% Orchard Office 100% Pacific Mutual Plaza 100% 3701 Birch Office 100% Newport Place 77% Bank of Newport 100% Bayside Square 100% Sea Island 37% Baywood Apartments 100% Harbor Point Homes 25% Roger's Gardens 100% Seaview Lutheran Plaza 100% Rudy Baron 100% Quail Business Center 100% 441 Newport Blvd. 100% Coast Business Center 5% Ross Mallard 40% Hughes Aircraft #2 100% Flagship Hospital 100% Big Canyon 10 24% Fun Zone 100% Marriott Hotel 100% St. Andrews Church 100% Allred Condos 100% Morgan Development 100% Four Seasons Hotel 100% Univ. Ath. Club 100% stock 400 Medical 100% Amend No 1 McArthur Court 52% Amendment No 2 Ford Aero 100% Carver Granville Office 100% Corona Del Mar Homes 100% Roson's Development 90% Block 500 Npt Ctr Prol 100% Newport Aquatics Center 45% Jasmine Park 100% s y�j TABLE 2 (continued) APPROVED PROJECTS SUMMARY PROJECT NAME PERCENT COMPLETED Newporter Inn Expansion 100% Fashion Is Renaissance 30% CON Senior Project 100% Point Del Mar 100% Pacific Club 100% Riverside Retait Building 1% Newport Sescrest Apt 100% 20th St Bed/Breakfast Inn 1% 3800 Campus Or (M-Storage) 1% Edwards Newport Center 1% Seaside Apts (Mesa 1I) 100% Victoria Station (Office) 100% 3760 Campus Or (MrStorage) 1% Newport Imports 1% Newport Place Tower 1% Fidelity National Title 1% Mariner's Mile Marine Ctr 40% 15th Street Apartments 100% Amendment No. 1 Ford Aero 100% Amendment No. 1 North Ford 100% 9 y5 TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF ONE PERCENT ANALYSIS AM PROJECT PEAK 2.5 HOUR VOLUMES LESS THAN 1% OF 1990 INTERSECTION NB SB EB W8 PEAK 2.5 HOUR VOLUMES Newport Blvd./32nd St. 6 6 0 0 YES Newport Blvd./Via Lido 6 6 0 0 YES Newport Blvd./Hospital Rd. 4 4 0 0 YES Coast Hwy./Balboa-Superior 2 0 2 0 YES Coast Hwy./Riverside Av. 0 0 2 2 YES Coast Hwy./Tustin Av. 0 0 2 2 YES PM PROJECT PEAK 2.5 HOUR VOLUMES LESS THAN 1% OF 1990 INTERSECTION NB SB EB WB PEAK 2.5' HOUR VOLUMES Newport Blvd./32nd St. 17 14 0 0 YES Newport Blvd./Via Lido 17 14 0 0 YES Newport Btvd./Hospital Rd. 10 a 0 0 YES Coast Hwy./Balboo-Superior 4 0 4 0 YES Coast Hwy./Riverside Av. 0 0 7 5 YES Coast Hwy./Tustin Av. 0 0 7 5 YES 10 Comparison of the one percent of the peak 2.5 hour volumes with the project peak 2.5 hour volumes resulted in each intersection analyzed passing the one percent analysis and requiring no further analysis. The one percent analysis sheets are included in the Appendix. CONCLUSIONS The proposed residential and retail development would generate 16 trips during the AM peak 2.5 hour period and 40 trips during the PM peak 2.5 hour period. Six intersections were checked to determine the marginal impact of project traffic on the street system. All six intersections passed the one percent analysis; therefore, the proposed project has no marginal impact on the study intersections. 1% Traffic Volume Anai•ris Intersection: Newport Blvd 8 32nd St Existino Traffic Volumes 3ased on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Soring 89 AM Peak 2 1/2 Hour AporoVed Approach E::iscino Regional Projects Projected 1X of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 112 H Growth Peak. 2 112 Hour Peak 2 I/2 H Peak 2 112 Hcur Peak 2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound — 2422 — 0 36 2458 25 6 --------------Southbound 1496 0 30 1526 15 6 ----------- ---Eastbound 873 0 0 873 4 0 Westoound 240 0 0 240 2 0 =J Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 112 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than IX of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization lI.C.U.1 Analysis is required. PROJECT: 8alboa/Washinoton FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR:84 SI . r . ira?fi_ Vclame Ara:ysis intersection: Newport 81ee 0 32ntl Si Existing Traffic Voluaes Based on Average Baily Traffic Hinter/Spring 88 Ph Peak 2 112 Hour Approved Appracn Existing Regional Projects Projected 1"s of Pro jecteg frg;ect Cirecticn Peak 2 112 d Growth Peak 2 1y2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 H Peak 2 112 Hour ?sax 2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 1696 0 56 1752 18 17 $outhbound 3000 0 71 3071 31 14 Eastbound 643 0 0 643 6 0 Bestbound 526 0 0 528 5 0 Froject Traffi: is estimated to be less than 1X of Projected Peak 2 112 Hour Traffic Volume, A Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization II,C.U.l Analysis is required. I. PROJECT: Balboamash:ngton FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR:89 (�D 1 s l i% Train: Volume Analysis Intersectipn: Newport Blvd @ V:a Lipp Exisuno Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 88 AM Peak 2 112 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Frojects Projected 1 of Projected Project 1/2 Hour oject Direction Peak 2 1/2 H Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 H Peak 2 112 Hour Peak Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 3041 0 53 3044 31 6 Southbound 2808 0 30 2838 28 6 Eastbound 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 --------------Westbound 1023 0 0 1023 10 0 =) Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than J% of Projected Peak 2 11/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersectipn Capacity Utilization Analysis is reouired. PROJECT: Balboa/Washington FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR:84 (�� 1 .� • 4 f v i% Trafric Voldae Analysis Intersection: Henoort Blvd O Via Lido Eaistigo Lfa+fic Volumes Based an Averaoe Daily ira?fic dinter/8gnnm E5 FM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Aooroved ADorodch Existing Regional Projects Projected lY of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 H Srosth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 F. Peak 2 112 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Volume Voluas Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 2761 0 60 2821 28 17 Southbound 4418 0 83 5001 50 14 Eastbound 0 0 0 0 0 0 Westbound 1410 0 0 1410 14 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume, Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization iI.C.U.I Analysis is reouired. y PROJECT: Balboa/Washington FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR:BB �y ---- -------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ix Traffic Jgiune Analysis j Intersection: Newport Blvd H Hospital Ro Existing Traffic Jalunes Based an Average Daliv Traffic Winter/Spring 88 AM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 17.. of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 P. 6rowth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 H Peak 21/2 Hour Fsak 2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 4380 Be 130 4606 46 4 Southbound 2426 49 242 2717 27 4 Eastbound 1297 0 89 1386 14 0 Westbound 932 0 28 960 10 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1'/. of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volute, Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: Balboal'Washington FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR:89 V3 y 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Newport Blvd @ Hospizal Rd Ex:stino Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 86 PH Peak 2 i/2 Hour Acoroved Aouroach Existing Regicnat Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 112 H growth Peak 2 112 Hour PeakV2 1/e H Peak Volume Hour Peak Volume Hour Volume Voiuoe Volume 251 3957 40 t4 Northbound 3633 73 Bouthbound 4551 91 144 4786 48 8 Eastbound 1688 4 364 2052 21 0 Westbound 1042 0 107 1149 11 0 ==> Project Traffic is estimated to be less than IX of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume,. ; Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than iX of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume, Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U,) Analysis is required. PROEM Balboa/Washington FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR:89 �� :Z Traffic Volume Analysis / Intersection: Coast Hwy O Balboa/Superior Existing Traffic Volumes Based an Average Daily Traffic-Winter/Spring 88 AN Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approacn Existing Regional Projects Projected 17. of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 H Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 H Peak 2 112 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 1635 0 13 1648 16 2 Southbound 1273 0 24 1297 13 0 Eastbound 5777 289 695 6761 68 2 ;estbaund 1866 93 266 2225 22 0 =_? Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than.l%,of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis is required. i i PROJECT: Balboa/'Washington FULL OCCUPANCY YEAM9 Y J :Y Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Coast Hwy d Balboa/Superior Existina Traffic Volutes Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Sprinq 88 Ph Peak 2 112 Hour Approvea Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 H Growth Peak 2 112 hour Peak 2 1/2 H Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 112 hour Volume Volute Volume Volume Volute Volume Northbound 2615 0 10 2625 26 4 Southbound 3020 0 120 3140 31 0 Eastbound 4817 241 512 5570 56 4 Westbound 4141 207 694 5047 50 0 :I =) Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected. Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilitatfbn (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. i r PROJECT: Balboa/Washington PULL OCCUPANCY YEAR:84 ----------------- ---- �� i'L Traffic volume Analysis intersac_ion: Coast HNy 5 P.iverside Av 88 AM 7:;istinc Traffic vclures Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring Peax 2 112 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 17. of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 d Growth Peak 2 1;2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 H Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak Volume Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ------- ------Northbound 18 0 3 21 0 0 8cuthbcuntl 771 0 80 871 7 0 ------��------Eastbound 7331 147 778 8256 83 2 Westbound 3112 62 . 500 3674 37 2 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1,". of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than I, of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume, Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. I PROOECT: Balboa/Washington FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR:89 V . . in 1 :j. -,raft: 7QIJee AnilVSia intersection: Coast Hwy a Riverside AY E::istina Traffic Volt,ae=_ Based on Average Daily Traffic Winter/59r dg 68 PH Pea,. 2 1/2 Hour Approved Approacn Existing Regional Projects Projected tY. of Projacted Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 H Growth Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 112 H Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 53 0 0 53 1 0 Southbound 1241 0 68 1309 I3 0 Eastbound 4820 96 761 5677 57 7 Westbcund 5571 1tt 856 6538 65 5 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Tratfic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume, Intersection Capacity Utilization fI.C.U.! Analysis is required. PROJECT: 6alboa/Hashinoton FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR:89 L� :7.. Traffic volume Ana,vs:s :ntersec:ion: Coast Hwy @ Tustir. Av Eeistino 'raffic Voiames Based or, Average Daily Traffic Winter/Spring 88 AM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approved Aoproacn E;isting Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 n Groath Peak 2 112 Hour Peak 2 1/2 H Peac 2 112 Hour Peak 2 1/2 hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume --------- 0 18 0 0 Northbound A 14 — � 3outhbound 123 0 15 142 1 0 Eastbound 4555 100 751 5850 54 Westbound 3305 bb 471 3846 30 2 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume, Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 hour Traffic Volume, Intersection Capacity Utilization 1I.C.U.j Analysis is required. PROJECT: Balboa/Washinotcn FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR:85 -------- -------------------------------------------- 1L ra!*ice 'igll'mE Analve;e Intersection: Coast HNv a Tustin Av Existing TraTfi[ Volumes Ba52a an Overage Daily Traffic WintenSpring 8a PM Peak 2 1/2 Hour Approvec Approach existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Direction Peak 2 In H Sroeth Freak 2 l/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 H Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 lour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 15 0 11 26 0 0 Southbound 270 0 26 296 3 0 Eastbound 4693 94 112 5499 55 7 Westbound 6009 120 936 6965 70 5 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. # Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume, Intersection Capacity Utilization :LC,U.1 Analysis is required. PROJECT: Balboa/Washinaton PULL OCCUPANCY YEAR:89 ✓,D 02-219- O] 5 TRAFFIC STUDIES • T//.E /SdYAK" 171*74&lJdV,— APPLICANT: CONSULTANTS: NAME: ' .64L4e.0 e&AFAr47nW �uS ram-- - ems? ✓Ssorr471` ?.+6• 311�1/ vsA tsm_ �ziE �2i3 1,vO nmrM i7-37rw Aos+vvE kveA(1vl /y.FwYorY �f.A C'ar .vaa 54Anp. 4A,,0, C44rAWA�r,4 92LG3 977o/ PHONE: /�f�G3-Z=82 3/h5�b6�- o�f96 0 PROJECT NAME: DESCRIPTION: �T./f f NX AFST.40.tA.Y/' /roe oVV4rr*V C�4 .EX2'SYTrV/j _ ,Yfs?4LD4hT Syl,/!E F� ,�lYTVB USA DATE DEPOSIT FEES PAYMENT REMAINING BALANCE F�so�gsy>of z,a9o. c» di 9, goo A� w-_y_-----F- _.-.-- � �EwPORr CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH RECEIPT 04 Bm NEWPORT BEACH. CALIFORNIA 92863�«�l No 29412 19P)yt G<,FOA�P t • { OATE Z ' hn`„1 I {� RECEIVED FROM, t-��/+C"'� -"'�^1_{�, (�yY� C �JT�, OO Q� -- t FOR: . 'Y'' i C ACCOUNT NO. AMOUNT 02- (oT-w D OEPARTME ( �� • L ... CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Copy DEMAND FOR PAYMENT February 27 1989 Date rY Demand of Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. Address: 1450 North Tustin Avenue, Suite 108 Santa Ana, California 92701 In the amount of $1,385.39 ITEM OF EXPENDITURE BUDGET # AMOUNT Professional services rendered re TPO Balboa/ Washington 1 Project No. 017.023 Invoice No. 2721 02-219-01 TOTAL $1,385.39 Approved For Payment: partment Headk Au 'ted d Approved: 0 Finance Director r , NAUSTIN-FOUST ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 1450 NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE, SUITE 108 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 • TELEPHONE (714) 667.0496 FAX(714) 667.7952 APPROV0 FOR PAYMENT February 9, 1989 By . _. .. City of Newport Beach Plan ri 9 DirectorT 3300 Newport Blvd, NT NO.: Newport Beach, CA 92663 INVOICE Invoice No: 2721 Subject: Bai6o 017alwashingtan AFA Project No: 011.023 Period: January 1 - 31, 1989 CLASSIFICATION HOURS RATE AMOUNT Principal (JEF) 6.00 $85.00 $510.00 Transportation Engineer 16.00 $45.00 $120.00 Tech/Clerical 3.00 $30.00 $90.00 SUBTOTAL 25.00 $1,320.00 DIRECT COSTS Printing and Reproduction $44.14 Travel and Communication $21.25 SUBTOTAL $65.39 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $1,385.39 Previously Invoiced $0,00 1` • ' This Invoice $1,385.39 9 Total Invoiced to Date $1,385.39 Amount Paid $000 Amount Outstanding $1,385:39 F �f 77