HomeMy WebLinkAboutTPO057_TOYOTA MOTORS EXPANSION TP0057
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
COUNCIL MEMBERS MINUTES
d A November 27, 1989
'OLL CALL INDEX
prepared by the County. Since that PW/SJHls
time, a great deal of preliminary TrnspCrdr
engineering work has been done and more Mjr Brdg
detailed cost estimates have been Fee Prgrm
repared, and the Agency is now
commending that the Developer Fees be
r ised to reflect those more detailed
co estimates. These fees pay for
app ximately 50% of the cost of the
Corr i or, with the other 50% proposed to
be pa i by the tolls. He reviewed the
existin and proposed fees, and stated
that the area subject to these fees lies
generally easterly of the Upper Newport
Bay and no therly of Coast Highway/5th
Avenue. Th fee is applicable only to
new developm t within the boundaries of
the program. he effective date of the
revised fees i estimated to be
December 14, 19
In response to qu tion raised by
Council Member Wat the City Attorney
advised that the con truction of the
Corridor has been dee ed by the State
Legislature and the cc its to be a
matter of State-wide co cern, and as
such, its construction w uld Cake
precedence over any Chart r provisions
that would be contrary to tare law.
Also, this particular issue does not
implicate the Charter becaus the
Charter relates solely to fre ay
construction agreements, and f ally,
very little, if any, of the Cor dor
will be constructed within the C ' as
it is primarily located outside Cil\the
i boundaries.
Hearing no one wishing to address
Council, the public hearing was closed
Motion x Motion was made to adopt Resolution No Res 89-125
All Ayes 89-125 establishing area of benefit and \\\\\\
approving an interim increase in
development fees for the San Joaquin
Hills Transportation Corridor.
3. Mayor Plummer opened the public hearing GPA 88-2(B)
regarding: (45)
A. GENERAL 'PLAN AMENDMENT 88-2(B) -
Request to amend the Land Use
Element of the General Plan so as
to allow 40,672t square feet of
additional development for research
and development and manufacturing
purposes in conjunction with the
existing Toyota design facility
Volume 43 - Page 477
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
COUNCIL MEMBERS MINUTES
G �r g s• N C
9y
� November 27, 1989
ROLL CALL INDEX
located within Area 1 of the North
Ford/San Diego Creek Planned
Community;
AND
B. TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 57 - Request to Trfc Stdy
approve a traffic study so as to 57
permit an additional 40,672± square
feet of additional development for
research and development and
manufacturing purposes in
conjunction with the existing
Toyota design facility located
within Area 1 of the North Ford/San
Diego Creek Planned Community;
AND
C. PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDMENT NO. PCA 678
678 - Request to amend the North
Ford/San Diego Creek Planned
Community Development Standards so
as to allow 40,672± square feet of
additional development for research
and development and manufacturing
purposes in conjunction with the
existing Toyota design facility
located within Area 1 of North
Ford/San Diego Creek Planned
Community. The proposal also
includes a request to establish a
specific parking requirement for
automotive design facilities within
the North Ford Planned Community
Development Standards.
Property located at 2800-2810
Jamboree Road, on the southeasterly
side of Jamboree Road between Bison
Avenue and Camelback Street, in the
North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned
Community; zoned P-C.
Report from the Planning Department.
Walter Meyer, architect for the project,
addressed the Council and stated he was
available for questions.
Hearing no others wishing to address the
Council, the public hearing was closed.
Volume 43 - Page 478
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
COUNCIL MEMBERS MINUTES
cpy'� `QC
�� �t ��► � November 27, 1989
ROLL CALL INDEX
In response to comment made by Council
Member Strauss regarding the reduction
in parking and at the same time allowing
additional square footage, the 'Planning
Director advised that the parking
requirement is only being reduced for
the design facility and if there was a
proposal to intensify the use in terms
of its parking requirements, the parking
would still remain at one space per 225
sq. ft., and the parking that is now
being eliminated would have to be
replaced.
Hearing no others wishing to address the
Council, the public hearing was closed.
Motion x Motion was made to:
All Ayes
(a) Adopt Resolution No. 89-126, Res 89-126
approving General Plan
Amendment 88-2(B) , amending
the Land Use Element of the
General Plan; and
(b) Sustain the action of the
Planning Commission and
approve Traffic Study No. 57;
and
(c) Adopt Resolution No. 89-127, Res 89-127
amending the North Ford/San
Diego Creek Planned Community
Development Standards to allow
40,672t square feet of
additional development for
research and development and
manufacturing purposes in
conjunction with the existing
Toyota design facility located
within Area 1 of the North
Ford/San Diego Creek Planned
Community; including request
to establish a specific
parking requirement for
automotive design facilities
within the North Ford Planned
Community Development
Standards.
4. Mayor Plummer opened the public hearing Vacation/
regarding VACATION AND ABANDONMENT of a Abandm
ortion of CHANNEL ROAD adjacent to the Channel Rd
p perty located at 2196 Channel Road, (90)
on ninsula Point.
Report m Public Works Department.
Volume 43 - Page 9
RESOLUTION NO, 89-126
Df� �`Ar vG 1-tt
04
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT B A H "rlty' OP 1989 m. F
AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL C,a�h` ACH n
SO AS TO INCREASE THE ALLOWABLE ON-SITE DEVELOPMENT AT q
2800 JAMBOREE ROAD BY 40,672 SQUARE FEET;
FROM 44,731 SQUARE FEET TO 85,403 SQUARE FEET
[General Plan Amendment No, 88-2(B) ]
WHEREAS, as part of the development and implementation of the City's
General Plan, the Land Use Element has been prepared; and
WHEREAS, said element of the General Plan sets forth objectives and
supporting policies which serve as a guide for future development of the City
of Newport Beach; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 707 of the Charter of the City of
Newport Beach, the Planning Commission has held a duly noticed public hearing
to consider certain amendments to the above referenced element of the Newport
Beach General Plan; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined, pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act, that the project is exempt from the provisions of
CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the information
contained in the Planning Commission Staff Report and the Excerpt of the Planning
Commission Minutes dated November 9, 1989, in making its decision on the proposed
amendment of the Land Use Element of the Newport Beach General Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Newport Beach that an amendment to the Land Use Element be approved as follows:
Increase the allowed on-site development at 2800 Jamboree Road by
40,672 sq.ft. , from 44,731 sq.ft, to 85,403 sq.ft. The increased
development is allocated to Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 41-27 (Resub-
division 328) for expansion of the Calty Design Research, Inc.
facility.
ADOPTED THIS 27th day of November 1989.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
IPO
Q - e A
O CITY CLERK
41-po Ft.
WRL/kk
A678-1.127
Rec IVfp
RESOLUTION N0. 89-127 8 DECO
eC DEEP . a
r 11
5 any C Og 198gs.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT B CAUP SOH,
AMENDING THE NORTH FORD/SAN DIEGO CREEK PLANNED COMMUNIT
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SO AS TO INCREASE THE ALLOWABLE DEVELOPM w
WITHIN AREA 1 BY 40,672 SQUARE FEET FROM 44,731 SQUARE FEET N
TO 85,403 SQUARE FEET; AND TO ESTABLISH A SPECIFIC
PARKING FORMULA FOR AUTOMOTIVE DESIGN FACILITIES
(Planning Commission Amendment No 678)
WHEREAS, Section 20,51.045 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code
provides that amendments to a Planned Community Development Plan must be
approved by a Resolution of the City Council, setting forth full particulars of
the amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has conducted a public hearing on
November 9, 1989, at which time this amendment to the North Ford/San Diego Creek
Planned Community Development Standards was discussed; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that the additional
development allocation of 40,672 square feet for Research and Development Uses
on property described as Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 41-27 (Resubdivision No. 328)
was appropriate; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that said additional
development will comply with the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the parking
demand for Automotive Design Facilities is significantly lower than typical
industrial research and development uses, so as to ,justify a lower parking
formula of 1.7 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that said amendment
to the Planned Community Development Standards for the North Ford/San Diego
Creek Planned Community, as set forth in the Planning Commission minutes of the
November 9, 1989 meeting is desirable; and
WHEREAS, the City of Newport Beach has conducted a public hearing
on the proposed amendment in accordance with all provisions of the law;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Newport Beach hereby approves the proposed amendment to the Planned Community
Development Plan for the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned CommunityDevelopment
i
Standards, as reflected in the minutes -of the Planning Commission meeting of
November 9, 1989.
ADOPTED this 27th day of November, 1989.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
��v✓POCITY CLERK
RT
Z
C9��'FO RN�P
WRL/kk
A678-1.127
_ 2
City Council Meeting November 27, 1989
Agenda Item No. D-3
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
TO: City Council
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: A. General Plan Amendment 88-2(B)
Request to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan so
as to allow 40,672± square feet of additional development for
research and development and manufacturing purposes in
conjunction with the existing Toyota design facility located
within Area 1 of the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned
Community.
AND
B. Traffic Study No. 57
Request to approve a traffic study so as to permit an
additional 40,672± square feet of additional development for
research and development and manufacturing purposes in
conjunction with the existing Toyota design facility located
within Area 1 of the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned
Community.
AND
C. Amendment No. 678
Request to amend the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned
Community Development Standards so as to allow 40,672± square
feet of additional development for research and development
and manufacturing purposes in conjunction with the existing
Toyota design facility located within Area 1 of the North
Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community. The proposal also
includes a request to establish a specific parking requirement
for automotive design facilities within the North Ford Planned
Community Development Standards.
LOCATION: Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 41-27 (Resubdivision No. 328) located
at 2800-2810 Jamboree Road, on the southeasterly side of
Jamboree Road, between Bison Avenue and Camelback Street, in
the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community.
ZONE: P-C
APPLICANT: Rossetti Associates, Architects and Planners, Santa Monica
OWNER: Toyota Motor Sales USA, Torrance
i
r �
TO; City council - 2.
Application
These applications involve a request to amend the Land Use Element of the General
Plan and the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community Development Standards
so as to allow the 40,672± square feet of additional development for research
and development and manufacturing purposes in conjunction with the existing
Toyota design facility located within Area 1 of the North Ford/San Diego Creek
Planned Community. The proposal also includes a request to establish a specific
parking requirement for automotive design facilities within the North Ford/San
Diego Creek Planned Community Development Standards and the approval of a traffic
study for the proposed development. General Plan Amendment procedures are set
forth in Council Policy Q-1, Planned Community Amendment procedures are set forth
in Chapter 20.51 of the Municipal Code, and Traffic Study procedures are set
forth in Chapter 15.40 of the Municipal Code.
Suggested Action
Hold hearing; close hearing; if desired,
a) Adopt Resolution No. , approving General Plan Amendment 88-
2(B) , amending the Land Use Element of the General Plan.
b) Sustain the action of the Planning Commission and approve Traffic
Study No. 57.
c) Adopt Resolution No. , amending the North Ford/San Diego Creek
Planned Community Development Standards to allow 40,672± square feet
of additional development for research and development and manufac-
turing purposes in conjunction with the existing Toyota design
facility located within Area 1 of the North Ford/San Diego Creek
Planned Community; including request to establish a specific parking
requirement for automotive design facilities within the North Ford
Planned Community Development Standards.
Planning Commission Recommendation
At its meeting of November 9, 1989, the Planning Commission voted (6 Ayes, 1
Absent) to recommend the approval of General Plan Amendment No. 88-2(B) , Traffic
Study No. 57 and Amendment No. 678 to the City Council. Copies of the Planning
Commission staff report and an excerpt of the draft Planning Commission minutes
dated November 9, 1989, are attached for the City Council's information.
Respectfully submitted,
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
JAME`�S D. HEWICKER, Director
by Ct�L��•a \ a- c-,Z/
WILLIAM R. LAYCOCK 7 +. WRL/kk
Current Planning Manager er GPA88-2B-TS57-A678.1127
r k •
TO: City Council - 3.
Attachments for City Council Only:
Vicinity Map
Planning Commission Staff Report dated 11/9/89, with attachments
Excerpt of Draft Planning Commission Minutes dated 11/9/89
Resolution For General Plan Amendment No. 88-2(B)
Resolution for Amendment No. 678
Plot Plan, Equipment and Furniture
Floor Plan, Elevations and Sections
A x
r
MAP MO
Cf!"Y OF It
9
ee P-C 9F+
s
b
Q
a to It •B•, it
n iEla^p �,
41 -A. ' o P-C
u sS 9 b i /.
u
a 3 B 65 , 6 +• ,
AA m
47 •h b Iwo ' • r4
B� ,p waI la ;y /B SI Ir f rH r# .IG S i CAMEC C(' P-c
�� � 4' AB y gYD m "�� • 8 �
KA
0�'J � � '7l B• of ry w` I! 2 i 3
a n w• I A`
.B Ni fA F m 'm I /r 7RACS (A(fn0 PA"
• 4{ . a Ay • ty
0� A\hil SST. 'H¢ M• , /w II! /N, •; '9 $ S /
p ' P t4 901
dLD # M . Ip �• o A f K
rA a TI •• a r9 /�'� SP �'Y'1%� 6 IP
NIT •N.1•• N N• er11 I 7
T nz'8 !1 • C II E K E,A r. L!
/Ad•' ` v0. MP/�OR fd i" • ,11 62 A F
a•4-8.2 Gb a7 N rya R/. ST,pE .iig IA ` s�$0
.AY P•�'�W -A rD Ir !L T7 CT P @ a[f r1I NO
RICTING-MAP-CITY-OF-NEWPORT-BEACH-CALIFORNIA
LTUAAL-MYOCINTIAL "$UICT C-N NMNGDNNODD CD CYL DISTRICT Y-1 M&NUFACTUAING DISTMCT REVISIONS
FAMILY DISTRICT C•O LIMITED CD -MULTIPLE AUICtRVAL RM AM
DICT MFA CONTAGLUD MUFACI001M OMIINCT
MYCIICIAL fyIMp1ITY CATION. 'T
IM ALIIDLMIIAL MWAICT C•1 LIGHT COMMERCIAL DISTRICT O COMBINING Olt •N OMTIIICT �" ••'� '
kTEO NULTIfYL A[MDLM"AL C-i MERAL COMMERCIAL CIRRICT SO COMBINING ON'E-YBTAICT AIIy YMN fNllMf'11M1t MIMNAAG IW A•11•Tf'
�LEALGNMNTIAL DIMCT C 1_] INT IATL DMINCT Ul UNLIMDED KQHT —aw ri.SA.�'v�HIfYANA✓Av✓ I/•M•If I'M O IOI
I MIWPMYO./,fNfalY GS S�J
-me DA 'B' w",cY CY� UNCLASSIFIED OUTIICT C� �w/�Iur,M.fr/I NaLE
unww..+
w""+e..e,A.fn.nnK
C''71LM/vSRAL., PXw4N SA,IT 8$-2 ($��
Pit eA1P ,&rA1T No. 670 AA10 7RAfF/C
u
Planning Commission Mee mg November 9. 1989
Agenda Item No. 11
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: A General Plan Amendment 88-2-(B) (Public Hearing)
Request to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan so
as to allow 40,672± square feet of additional development for
research and development,and manufacturing purposes in conjunction
with the existing Toyota design facility located within Area 1 of the
North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community.
AND
B. Traffic Study No 57 (Public Hearing)
Request to approve a traffic study so as to permit an additional
40,672± square feet of additional development for research and
development, and manufacturing purposes in conjunction with the
existing Toyota design facility located within Area 1 of the North
Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community.
AND
C. Amendment No 678 (Public Hearing)
Request to amend the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned
Community Development Standards so as to allow 40,672± square
feet of additional development for research and development, and
manufacturing purposes in conjunction with the existing Toyota design
facility located within Area 1 of the North Ford/San Diego Creek
Planned Community. The proposal also includes a request to
establish a specific parking requirement for automotive design
facilities within the North Ford Planned Community Development
Standards.
LOCATION: Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 41-27 (Resubdivision No. 328) located at
2800 - 2810 Jamboree Road, on the southeasterly side of Jamboree
Road, between Bison Avenue and Camelback Street, in the North
Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community.
ZONE: P-C
APPLICANT: Rossetti Associates, Architects and Planners, Santa Monica
OWNER: Toyota Motor Sales USA, Torrance
1 R • •
TO: Planning Commission -2.
Application
These applications involve a request to amend the Land Use Element of the General
Plan and the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community Development Standards
so as to allow the 40,672± square feet of additional development for research and
development, and manufacturing purposes, in conjunction with the existing Toyota design
facility located within Area 1 of the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community.
The proposal also includes a request to establish a specific parking requirement for
automotive design facilities within the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community
Development Standards and the approval of a traffic study for the proposed development.
General Plan Amendment procedures are set forth in Council Policy Q-1, Planned
Community Amendment procedures are set forth in Chapter 20.51 of the Municipal Code
and Traffic Study procedures are set forth in Chapter 15AO of the Municipal Code.
Suggested Action
Hold hearing, close hearing; if desired,
a) Adopt Resolution No. (attached) recommending to the City Council
adoption of General Plan Amendment 88-2 (B), amending the Land Use Element
of the Newport Beach General Plan increasing the allowable on-site development
at 2800 Jamboree Road by 40,672± square feet from 44,731± square feet to
85,403± square feet.
(b) Adopt Resolution No. (attached) approving Amendment No. 678 and
recommending to the City Council adoption of said application, as proposed.
(c) Approve Traffic Study No. 57 with the following findings:
1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the
proposed project on the circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15A0
of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and Council Policy S-1.
2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project-generated traffic will
neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic on any
'major', 'primary-modified', or 'primary' street.
Environmental Significance
This project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and
it has been determined that it is exempt from the provisions of CEQA as provided in
Section 1501(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines in that the activity is covered by the
general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a
significant effect on the environment. This determination is made based on the isolated
location of the project in combination with the unusually low occupancy of the new
structures.
A TO: Plannf Commission -3. •
Subject Proierly and Surrounding Land Use
The subject property is currently developed with an automotive design facility containing
44,731 sq.ft. of gross floor area and 188 parking spaces. Said development is contained
with three existing buildings which are identified as Buildings A, C and D on the
attached Plot Plan. To the north and east at a lower elevation, are existing
commercial/industrial uses, a post office, and a synagogue. These uses are located along
Camelback Street. To the south and approximately 35 feet higher is Mariner's Church
and a vacant parcel. To the west, across Jamboree Road and approximately 50 feet
higher, is the single family subdivision of Eastbluff. The subject property is screened
from view along the south and west by dense landscaping.
Existing General Plan Provisions
In conjunction with the City's adoption of the October 24, 1988 General Plan update,
the allowable development for Area 1 of the North Ford Planned Community was
established at 107,369 square feet. Said figure represents the combined square footage
of the existing Toyota design facility (44,731± sq.ft.), the square footage of the existing
Mariner's Church (29,961± sq.ft.) and a provision for a 32,677 square foot expansion of
the Mariner's Church.
AnWysis
The existing Toyota design facility, known as Calty Design Research, Inc., was established
on the subject property in 1978. Since that time, the facility has operated within the
existing improvements on the property which include 16,387± square feet of office use,
16,222± square feet of research and development, 8,586± square feet of shops and
3,536± square feet of storage area. The maximum number of employees during this
time has been 35 people.
As indicated in the attached letter from Calty Design Research, their facility is
responsible for developing conceptual automotive designs which are then sent to Toyota
City, Japan, for review, refinement, and incorporation into automotive production. In
order to satisfy their need for future growth, Calty is now proposing to expand their
facility so as to add approximately 40,672± square feet of additional floor area for
research and development purposes (Building "B" on the attached Plot Plan plus a 4,000
sq.ft. addition to Building "C"). The outline on the following page sets forth the mayor I
characteristics of the existing and proposed facility. i
1
TO: Planning Commission -4.
Land Area: 323,258± sq.ft
Existin2 Proposed Net Change
Allowable development:
Office: 16,387± sq.ft. 10,673± sq.ft. 5,714± sq.ft.
decrease
Research &
Development: 24,808± sq.ft. 71,194± sq.ft. 52,100± sq.ft.
increase
Warehouse/Storage: 3.536± sa.ft. 3.536± sq.ft. None
Total 44,731± sq.ft. 85,403± sq.ft.1 40,672± sq.ft.
increase
Floor Area Ratio: 0.138 0.264
Required/
Permitted xi in Proposed
Setbacks:
Front: (Jamboree Rd.) 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft.
Sides: 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft.
Rear: None Varies between Same as edsbg
8 ft. & 12ft.
Building Height: 50 ft. 38 ft. 38 ft.
Number of Employees: 35 95
Parking Requirement:
Office: @ 1 space/225 sq.ft. 48 spaces
Research & Development: @ 3 spaces/1000 sq.ft. 214 spaces
Warehouse/Storage: @ 1 space/1000 sq.ft. 4 spaces
Total Required: 266 spaces
Existing Parking: 188 spaces
Proposed Parking: @ 1.70 spaces/1000 sq.ft. 146 spaces
Net decrease: 42 spaces
As indicated in the above outline, the proposed expansion will result in a 5,117 sq.ft.
decrease in office area which is now going to be used for research and development.
In addition to the converted floor area, the new construction will include 40,672 square
feet of additional floor area for research and development, which will bring the total
floor area devoted to research and development to 71,194 square feet. Said floor area
represents approximately 83 percent of the total development of the site. It should also
11he attached Plot Plan indicates the total building square footage is 81,867 square feet; however, this figure does not include
the existing 3,536 square foot storage building (Building D). This additional square footage brings the total proposed gross floor
area to &5,403* sq.ft.
1 ATO: g Planni Commission -5. •
be noted that the expanded facility will have only 95 employees as indicated in the
attached letter from Calty Design Research, Inc.
Off Street Parkins Considerations
As indicated in the above outline, the proposed project is required to provide 266 off-
street parking spaces based on the parking formulas included in the North Ford/San
Diego Creek Planned Community Development Standards. Said parking formulas are
1 parking space for each 225 square feet of office area, 3 parking spaces for each 1000
square feet of floor area devoted to manufacturing or research and development and 1
parking space for each 1000 square feet used for warehouse/storage. Said formulas have
been applied to the project inasmuch as there is no specific parking requirement in the
Planned Community text for automotive design facilities.
However, because of the rather unique aspects of the subject project relative to the small
number of employees which will work at the site, the applicant is requesting to amend
the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community Development Standards so as to
establish a specific parking formula which is reflective of the actual parking demand for
automotive design facilities. The applicant's request is based on the fact that the
automotive design process requires large expanses of space which are used for the
production and viewing of full size automobile models, but involve only a small number
of employees in the design process. For the Planning Commission's information the
applicant has identified all of the existing and future employee work stations on the
attached furniture and equipment floor plans.
Because of the small number of employees which will work at the facility, it is the
applicant's opinion that the proposed 146 parking spaces will be adequate to meet the
parking demand for the project. This number of parking spaces would provide 95 spaces
for employees and 51 parking spaces for visitors to the site. As indicated in the attached
letter from Calty, there will be two types of visitors to the facility; material vendors (no
more than five at a time) and corporate visitors from Japan (no more than 25 at a time).
Based on this information, the applicant is proposing to establish a parking formula of
1.70 parking spaces for each 1,000 square feet of floor area for automotive design
facilities. Such a formula would require a total of 146 parking spaces (85,403 sq.ft.
1,000 x 1.7 = 145.19 or 146 spaces).
As part of staffs review of the proposed parking, we have also addressed the possible
concern regarding the consequences of the facility being sold in the future and converted
to an office use which would require 1 parking spaces for each 225 square feet, or a
total of 380 parking spaces. If this were to occur, staff has determined that there is
adequate undeveloped area within the subject property to construct at least 239 additional
parking spaces, so as to provide a total of 385 on-site parking spaces. Should such an
event occur, the City would require that the additional parking spaces be provided in
conjunction with the building permits issued for the building alterations.
Considering the above information, the Planning Department staff and the City Traffic
Engineer are satisfied that the proposed parking formula suggested by the applicant is
1
TO: Planning Commission -6.
adequate to meet the parking demand of the use.
Traffic Study
In accordance with the CiWs Traffic Phasing Ordinance, the applicant is required to
obtain the approval of a traffic study for the additional proposed development. Said
traffic study has been prepared and is attached for the Planning Commission's review.
It should be noted that the Traffic Study was prepared based on a 36,672 square foot
addition; however, since that time the applicant has revised his plans so as to add an
additional 4,000 square feet to the design studio in Building "C". As indicated in the
attached memorandum from the City Traffic Engineer, said addition will not increase the
trip generation characteristics of the project and therefore will not effect the results of
the traffic study.
The proposed project is expected to be completed within the next year; therefore,
analyses were completed for 1991. The City Traffic Engineer identified eleven (11)
intersections which could be affected by the project at full occupancy. The first step in
evaluating intersections is to conduct a 1% Traffic Volume Analysis, taking into
consideration existing traffic, regional growth and the traffic of previously committed
projects. For any intersection where, on any approach leg, the project traffic is estimated
to be greater than 1% of the projected morning and afternoon peak two and one-half
hour volume, Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) is required.
Results of the one percent test indicate that the project traffic exceeded 1% of projected
traffic on one or more of the approach legs of the intersections at Bison Avenue and
Jamboree Road; and MacArthur Boulevard and Bison Avenue. Therefore, an ICU
analysis was required in each case, the results of which are shown in the following table:
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Test Results
Existing 1991 +Committed
PEAK Existing +Committed +Growth
Intersection HOUR (1989) Growth +Project
Bison Avenue/ AM 0.62 0.75 0.75
Jamboree Road PM 0.58 0.71 0.71
MacArthur Boulevard/ PM 0.65 0.80 0.80
In the case of both of the above intersections, the projected ICU ratios do not exceed
0.90 in either the AM or PM peak traffic periods. Therefore the project meets the
requirement of the Traffic Phasing Ordinance at these intersections.
1°
' TO: planning Commission -7.
becific Findines
Should the Planning Commission wish to approve the subject applications said actions
should be taken as set forth in the Suggested Action Section of the staff report. Staff
has not included an Exhibit for denial of the applications inasmuch as staff can not at
this time determine adequate findings for denial. However, there may be additional
information presented at the public hearing which may provide grounds for denial.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director
B •
Villiam Ward
Senior Planner
Attachments: Vicinity Map
Letter from Calty Design Research, Inc.
Revised page of the North Ford/San Diego Greek
Planned Community Text
Resolution for General Plan Amendment No. 88-2(B)
Resolution for Amendment No. 678
Memorandum from the City Traffic Engineer
Traffic Study
Plot Plan, Equipment and Furniture Floor Plans,
Elevations and Sections
F:\WP5o\BILL W\AMEND\A678
r
�I
[ x
Ty' AMR •
MA/ 10 /I
1 •
CITY OF #
9
n
9
ss P-CP
H A
4 to
dr �' B •L•LA
tT �rBAID N, tl
P-C
A[ ri of
sz
R-3 B K h Y y. T Al
[L
64 .A .Q� IN �•� 14
11I n
A H •LI 'x N IG S i CAMEG� P-C
DR• •
oy ¢ 4 HIS Pr'RD DI 1"� 6
4 sf
�,•I ,,4. ,� sd •Tr "`y I mor 10,
P
P ,s , p r• a /Y m. R i. i -PC- IVD
3-B IM�D) ,Ty�4 y ? N' m lu n4, •'I $ Zricr GGBo
it. 9 P]
5 a /
a 19 10
AI LN Ito
is 13 S
cA
] D N TS ' .M• V
A
f
/soo' u >; n gISDN
q•4-8-2 L7 sL 3S R 1. STREET IL
BL ii
SEC YIN MO 11 3L A Y IS ` ELL MAP NO
CTRICTING-MAP-CITY-OF-NEWPORT-BEACH-CALIFORNIA '� R',
14WRAL-KNOT ITIAL DISTRICT C•N MGSMSOMNDOD COINfACI•L DISTRICT F61-1 YANUFACTWNO DISTRICT REVISIONS
]y1Np11T1• LOCATIONS
! TINILY DISTRICTC•0 LIMITED COYY[RCIAL-YULTVL[RLSIDp11Rl DISTRICTWU M
DISTRICT Y•M CONTROLLED YTAC111N DVR ,NN W„
LT Atl10[bl•l DISTRICT C•I LICK COYY[RCW. DISTRICT O COCISINIIB 011 'N'DISTRICT +., '.`•`iw:D.rrmus
MCTLD MUlT1ILE MEYO[Mr,AL C-[ SCI[MAL COIIMEMDIAL DISTRICT ZO COYSIMINS DI1'['DISTRICT MIILONN Y41C1/ MDNT NMN•NCS IYI• S•II•TS
I� YL UNLIMITED N[NNT u/1)/ r',JNR•' 1)MINn.'/WI //YN I.
D 101
PLC M[SIMMIAL DISTRICT L 1 INTQ![DIAT[ N]1MCT =1=_ .Iw.nm/`rr%
U�1 UIICLA]]IFIED DISTRICT Y�WIrALIW /NEB _l
WINS OR ']' W1M1CT G..J �� �'i n�YL
MNK AwY'-!)K
G /l/AM0i2�4LN ,aMIT gleam (ra),
AMI&,.A1DM4MT A/OM 6 78 AA1O MA F/C
Sraoy ,vo. '
CALTY DESIGN RESEARCH, INC.
October 27, 1969 2610 JAMBOREE ROAD
.� NEWPORTBEACH
CA 92660-329B
(7141 7 59-1701
James D.Hewicker
Planning Director
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, California 92658-8915
Dear Jim:
Per William Ward's request,we are providing this letter to further clarify the nature of our work and
further justify the reduction of parking in the expansion of our facility.
Catty Design Research is an automotive design firm which was founded sixteen years ago. In
1978 we moved to our current facility on Jamboree Road. Our name Catty is an amalgamation of
"California"and"Toyota".
Our task is to produce Conceptual Designs which are then sent to Toyota City,Japan for review,
refinement, and incorporation into automotive production.
For each design we produce sketches, renderings, mufti-media presentations, and full size
models which are cast from clay mock ups. We accomplish these tasks with a relatively small staff
of thirty-five employees which has remained consistent for the past eleven years. We have
planned the expansion to accommodate any future growth which would total no more than
ninety-five employees over a five year period. Due to the nature of our work we require large
areas for the few people we employ.
We are a"design think tank"where designers will have many areas provided for their use. Each
design will have a design team which,during different phases of the process,will utilize drawing
stations,a library,large design studios,wood and metal shops, a paint booth,mufti-media facilities
and conference rooms.
There are two types of visitors to the facility;material vendors and corporate visitors from Japan.
Neither group has a significant impact on the parking demand. Vendors are not encouraged due
to the high security level required around our designs. There are no more than four or five
vendors at one time at the facility. Each year corporate executives and designers from Japan visit
Catty for administrative coordination and design collaboration. The maximum number of people in
the visiting group is twenty-five and they share cars form the hotel. Therefore,twelve parking
spaces would be the maximum required. Once again, I would like to reiterate that we do not
encourage visitors due to the secretive nature of our work. Finally,we are constructing a very
specialized facility for a very specialized function. We have enjoyed the last eleven years here and
with the expansion do not anticipate any relocation in the future.
I hope this explanation of CALTY will be helpful In reviewing the project.
Sincerely,
Mr.Hiroaki Ohba
Executive Vice-President
CALTY DESIGN RESEARCH, INC.
HOrh .tq
�3
AM560 RW Tiy� Np�!/lrrg
r�wee CAM&
Parking shall be provided for each buil development in accordance
with the requirements set forth below based on the proportion of each type
of use to the total building site below based on the proportion of each
type of use to the total building site.
Required Off-street parking shall be provided on subject Bite or on a
contiguous site or within 300 feet of the subject site. Where parking is
provided on other than the site concerned, a recorded document shall be
approved by the City Attorney and filed with the Planning Department and
signed by the owners of the alternate site stipulating to the permanent
reservation of use of the site for said parking.
The following guide shall be used to determine parking requirements.
Automotive Design Facilities
3 .70 narking spaces for each 1,000 sg ft. of gross floor area.
office
One (1) space for each 225 square feet of net floor area. The parking
requirement may be lowered to one (1) space for each 250 square feet of
net floor area upon review and approval of the modification committee.
Manufacture Research and Assembly
Two (2) parking spaces for each three (3) employees, but in no event less
than one (1) spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for the
first 20,000 square feet; one (1) space for each 2,000 square feet of gross
floor area for the second 20,000 square feet; one (1) space for each 4,000
square feet of gross floor area for areas in excess of the initial 40,000
square feet of floor area of the building.
The number of employees for parking purposes shall be determined by the
largest number of employees present on the site at one time. In the event
there is more than one (1) shift, sufficient parking must be provided on-
site to preclude the necessity for on-street parking.
J. As a portion of the total landscaping scheme, certain streets and areas
have been designated as "Special Landscaped Streets and Areas." Landscape
es of sai d streets requires special
the fronts qu
treatment along 4
consideratio
n and therefore is referred to under Beparate sections int he
following landscaping standards. Detailed landscaping and irrigation
ing
plane, prepared by a licensed landscape architect, licensed landscaping
contractor, or architect shall be submitted to and approved by the Director
of Parks, Beaches, and Recreation prior to the issuance of a building
permit and installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
All landscaping referred to in this section shall be maintained in a neat
and orderly fashion.
-11-
GRD138
�1
' 0 Resolution No. _. is
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL
ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88-2(B)
AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN
SO AS TO2800 ON-SrrEDEVELOPMENT AT
JAMBOREE ROAD BY 0672 SQUARE FEET;FROM 44,731 SQUARE FEET TO 85,403 SQUARE FEET
WHEREAS, as part of the development and implementation of the City's
General Plan, the Land Use Element has been prepared; and
WHEREAS, said element of the General Plan sets forth objectives and
supporting policies which serve as a guide for future development of the City of Newport
Beach; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 707 of the Charter of the City of Newport
Beach, the Planning Commission has held a duly noticed public hearing to consider
certain amendments to the above referenced element of the Newport Beach General
Plan; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined, pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act, that the project is exempt from the provisions of CEQA.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of
the City of Newport Beach that an amendment to the Land Use Element be
recommended to the City Council for approval, as follows: t
Increase the allowed on-site development at 2800 Jamboree Road by 40,672
sq.ft., from 44,731 sq.ft. to 85,403 sq.ft. The increased development is
allocated to Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 41-27(Resubdivision 328)for expansion
of the Calty Design Research, Inc. facility.
ADOPTED THIS _ day of 1989.
AYES
NOES
ABSENT
Gary W. Pomeroy, Chairman
Jan Debay, Secretary
Resolution No.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE.CITY OF NEWPORT
1113ACII RIiCOMMENDING TO Till", CITY COUNCIL THE APPROVAL OF
AMENDMENT NO. 678, AMENDING THE NORTH FORD/SAN DIEGO CREEK
PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, SO AS TO: INCREASE
THE ALLOWABLE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN AREA I BY 40,672 SQUARE FEET
FROM 44,731 SQUARE FEET TO 85,403 SQUARE FEET; AND TO ESTABLISH A
SPECIFIC PARKING FORMULA FOR AUTOMOTIVE DESIGN FACILITIES.
WHEREAS, Section 2051.045 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code
provides that amendments to a Planned Community Development Plan must be approved
by a Resolution of the Planning Commission setting forth full particulars of the
amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has conducted a public hearing on
November 9, 1989, at which time this amendment to the North Ford/San Diego Creek
Planned Community Development Standards was discussed; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that the additional
development allocation of 40,672 square feet for Research and Development Uses on
property described as Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 41-27 (Resubdivision No. 328) was
appropriate; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that said additional
development will comply with the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the parking
demand for Automotive Design Facilities is significantly lower than typical industrial
research and development uses, so as to justify a lower parking formula of 13 parking
spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of
the City of Newport Beach that Amendment No. 678, as further set forth in the attached
Planning Commission minutes dated November 9, 1989, be recommended to the City
Council for adoption.
ADOPTED this _ day of 1989, by the following vote, to
wit:
AYES
NOES
ABSENT
BY
Gary W. Pomeroy, Chairman
BY
Jan Debay, Secretary
November 2, 1989
TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ATTN: BILL WARD
FROM: TRAFFIC ENGINEER
SUBJECT: TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE TOYOTA FACILITY EXPANSION
.
The current plans for the Toyota expansion reflect an increase of
4,000 square feet over the 36,672 expansion analyzed in the
traffic study. I have reviewed the plans and discussed then with
the project architect and as satisfied that the increased area is
in the design studio and not in additional office areas.
Based on this review of the project as currently proposed, the
traffic study does not need to be revised. The increased studio
area should not result in any increase in travel to this site.
I
Richard M. Edmonston
Traffic Engineer
44.
!7
. i•
• I I
i
CALTY/TOYOTA EXPANSION PROJECT
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
Prepared for.
City of Newport Beach, California
Prepared by.
Kimley-Horn and Associates
Anaheim, California
August 1989
COPR 1989 Kimley-Horn
9408.00
t�
4 Y . •
TABLE OF COWfENTS
PROJECT DESCRIPTION I
4
TRIP GENERATION
TRIP DISTRIBUTION 6
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 12
A. Committed Projects
B. Regional Growth
C. Intersections to be Analyzed
D. 1% Test
E. ICU Test
MITIGATIONS 16
ON SITE CIRCULATION AND PARKING 16
SITE ACCESS 16
SUMMARY 17
APPENDICES
1. Committed projects
2. 1% test sheets
3. ICU calculation sheets
4. Parking Analysis
l�
II
FIGURES
FIGURE 1: LOCATION MAP 2
FIGURE 2: PROPOSED SITE PLAN 3
FIGURE 3: PERCENT TRIP DISTRIBUTION 7
FIGURE 4: AM PEAK HOUR TRIP DISTRIBUTION 8
FIGURE 5: PM PEAK HOUR TRIP DISTRIBUTION 10
I
TABLES
TABLE 1: LAND USE (EXISTING) I
TABLE 2: LAND USE (PROPOSED) I
TABLE 3: GENERATION RATES 4
TABLE 4: TRIP GENERATION (EXISTING CONDITIONS) 5
TABLE 5: TRIP GENERATION (PROPOSED CONDITIONS) 5
TABLE 6: REGIONAL TRAFFIC ANNUAL GROWTH RATES 12
TABLE 7: 1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS RESULTS 14
TABLE 8: INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION TEST RESULTS 15
I
�k
a6
•
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Kimley-Horn and Associates has been retained to•'provide a traffic impact analysis of the
CALTY/Toyota Expansion Project. This study presents an assessment of project traffic impacts and
possible mitigation measures necessary for the projected traffic of the expanded facility.
The site is located directly east of Jamboree Road, north of Bison Avenue in the City of Newport
Beach, California. Figure I shows the regional location of the site with respect to key transportation
features and various city locations. The project, which is an expansion of the existing site use, forms
its southern boundary with Mariners' Church property and its western boundary with Jamboree
Road. Current land uses for the property are shown in Table 1. Land uses for the proposed
conditions, which include an additional building,are defined in Table 2 and are illustrated in Figure
2. The project is estimated to be complete by 1991 and is assumed, for this study, to be 100%
occupied at that date.
TABLE 1: LAND U$E (EXISTING)
Existing Use Size s St.
Office 12,295
Building A Research 3.720
16,015 Total
Building C Office/Studio 16,594
Shops 8.586
25,180 Total
TABLE 2: LAND USE (PROPOSED)
Existing Use Sizes .ft.
Building A
Office 6,581
(remodel) 10.059
Research & Development 16,640 Total
Building B Research & Development 36,047 Total
Building C Office 4,092
(remodel) 21 088
Manufacture/Research 25,190 Total
1 `iy
air
c s � •
i
3 eR'srp� 3
sl
�R/Srp! �YpRly
Sp
UNIVE Sin
DR.
PROJECT 40�'
SITE
�P5 3
m
BISON AV. j
IRVINE
COSTA MESA
FORD ROAD
NEWPORT BEACH
e° EiT "p
44 c 9pG
� m iy
idEwPORT
�O
CENTER
p�C/FjC
COAST
tic
yy,
Il RY
LOCATION MAP
CALTY/TOYOTA EXPANSION
FIGURE 1
I1
,
V� ) NTS
940800
7/89
I -'K
'may '�,, ��, y� ✓�
'-
PROPOSED SITE MAP
r\C PSTT�d .. ••
CALTY/TOYOTA EXPANSION
MARINERS CHURCH FIGURE2
�- I
a 0 •
TRIP GENERATION
Trip generation for existing and proposed conditions for the site were determined using the ITE
Trip Generation Manual, 4th Edition. Tables 3 &4 provide a summary of trip generation rates and
resulting trip ends for both the AM and PM peak hour of the adjacent street.
The City of Newport Beach provided Kimley-Horn with trip generation rates. A comparison of the
ITE rates and City rates is shown in Table 3 and indicates the ITE equations result in higher trip
generation. The analysis in this study assumes the more conservative ITE rates.
TABLE 3: GENERATION RATES
City of ITE
Newport Beach Calculated
A. Office (General)
AM in 2.0 2.3
AM out .4 .4
PM in .6 .5
PM out 1.7 2.4
B. Industrial
AM in .g 1.2
AM out .2 .2
PM in .4 .2
PM out .7 1.1
The ITE trip rates are equations using development size as a fixed variable. This approach takes into
account the internalization factor within each use. As per the City of Newport Beach's direction,
Building A was to be considered office space and Building C was to be considered a light industrial
area for the purpose of calculating trip generation by the existing site. For the proposed expansion,
light industrial data was applied for the Research & Development areas as well as the
Manufacture/Research area. Due to the characteristics of the land uses,no internal assignments were
made between the office and industrial uses. No reduction was assumed for either the use of
alternative transportation modes or car pooling.
After calculating the number of trips generated for both existing and proposed conditions, a
difference was taken to determine the additional trips created. 173 trips will be added daily, 32
occurring during the AM peak hour and 31 during the PM peak hour. Refer to Tables 4 and 5 for
the various generations.
4 =t
•" I
TABLE 4: TRIP GENERATION (EXISTING CONDITIONS)
Land use Souare feet Dailv AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
rate id in rate tri s in out rate trills in ut
Office 16,015 21.667 347 2.560 41 36/5 2.658 43 7/36
Light
Industrial 25,180 8.975 . 226 1.787 45 40/5 1.708 43 5/38
TOTAL 41,195 573 86 76/10 86 12/74
TABLE 5: TRIP GENERATION (PROPOSED CONDITIONS)
Land use Souare feet Dail v AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
rate trim rate tri s in out rate jEjM in out
Office 10,673 23.986 256 2.717 29 25/4 2.905 31 5/26
Light
Industrial 67,194 7.292 490 1.324 89 78/11 1.280 86 10/76
TOTAL 77,867 746 118 103/15 117 15/102
5
I
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
The directional distribution of additional travel demand'is based upon current and future land use
patterns, the existing roadway network, current travel patterns and the demographic distribution
of the surrounding region. The City of Newport Beach provided Kimley-Horn with a trip
distribution of the area which had been used in past traffic studies. After reviewing this
information, the distribution was adopted with minor revisions. The percentages shown in Figure
3 were applied to the generated trips to develop a basic travel demand pattern for the AM and PM
peak hour periods. Figures 4 and 5 show the actual generated trips for the AM and PM peak hours,
respectively.
I
6 "i F
t
3 e 15 % 3
Res
�5%�
�O,p�SlO NORTy
T 10%J 10% 1 0
o�
40 % 40%`�
20%
UNIVERSITY
5% �.�>►
%5
PROJECT �o� 60% 5 �
SITE o�J�
3
60 . 10% m
15% 15%
IRVINE
COSTA MESA 15% :9 75%, �25%
O p0RD BISON AV,
ROAD 15%
�4v
O�
�0
15% 'P NEWPORT BEACH
15 %
S9N
9'G9 v09O
a ylls !
D 'Q
NEWPORT
jC 15% CENTER 15 %
COAST
N
15%
�qr
1 TRIP DISTRIBUTION
{15% CALTY/TOYOTA EXPANSION
IJTS FIGURE 3
9408.00 414
7
3 aR 3
sT
eR�sT ' �ORr
o� it
Sp SEE FIGURE 4A
UNIVERSITY
+ DR.
r
PROJECT �<�7 f
SITE
3
�¢000 27.J BISON AV mJ
IRVINE
U
COSTA MESA „� FORD. RDAD
.o
NEWPORT BEACH
0
F.�'�pP a/ ✓O9OG�2
p� [n Sp
y NEWPORT .�
pgC�F/C ^ CENTER
COAST f
N 4- 1 hicy a
. �qY
AM PEAK HOUR
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
CALTY/TOYOTA EXPANSION I
,JT
FIGURE 4 I
9 408.00 �M
$ (oKf
I
V
sra�
V NORTH'
of
ARCS
o �
1�
O
LL
J
m
F
QN
W
N '
AM .PEAK HOUR
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
CALTY/TOYOTA EXPANSION
NTS FIGURE 4A
9408.00
8/89 w
9
3 e,�sTs 3
� s
r
6,p�ST0
NORT/r
ST SEE FIGURE 5A
UNIVERSITY
OR.
PROJECT �o�A N�
SITE 0� f
3
ry 1
OHO 2 J BISON AV• m
C�QC 3 J
a—t Q: IRVINE
U
h � .
COSTA MESA / FORD ROAO ;
/h NEWPORT BEACH
/h
S9ti
�opo ✓09
m
y
> NEWPORT a
pAO�F�C h CENTER
-� COAST f
N y'�y
�F}
PM PEAK HOUR
i TRIP DISTRIBUTION
CATTY/TOYOTA EXPANSION
NTS ,'�a} FIGURE 5
9408.00
a/as �D�CxiPw
10 �D
,
U
eR�sr
/\
FiVz\
,
J
'1
o �
N
4
J
ID
F-
N
W
N
i
I
PM PEAK HOUR
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
CALTY/TOYOTA EXPANSION
I FIGURE 5A
NTS
9403.00
8/89
11 ��
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Kimley-Horn evaluated the comparative impact the CALTY/Toyota Expansion would create together
with committed projects approved by the City thus far, and regional growth for the area. With this
information, key intersections were analyzed using the 1% Test, and some were further analyzed
using the ICU Test.
A. Committed Projects
Committed Projects are those that are approved to be built or are being built in the area, thus
contributing to future traffic. The City of Newport Beach provided Kimley-Horn with a listing of
all approved projects. A copy of this data is in Appendix 1. The committed projects and the traffic
they generated were used in analyzing traffic flow in the area.
B. Regional Growth
Regional Traffic Annual Growth Rates provided by the City of Newport Beach were used to estimate
the traffic increases at each intersection. Table 6 shows the rates on various streets. Only those rates
which were used in this report are included. All other streets analyzed have 0% regional growth per
City guidelines. Regional growth rates were applied over 2 years, since the project is expected to
be completed and occupied in that time frame.
TABLE 6: REGIONAL TRAFFIC ANNUAL GROWTH RATES
Street Growth
A. Coast Highway
- East City Limit to MacArthur Boulevard 4%
- MacArthur Boulevard to Jamboree Road 2%
- Jamboree Road to Newport Boulevard 1%
B. Jamboree Road
- Coast Highway to MacArthur Boulevard 1%
C. MacArthur Boulevard
- Coast Highway to Jamboree Road 5%
- Jamboree Road to North City Limit iMo
12 `i.,
C. Intersections to be Analyzed
Eleven intersections were initially identified by the City to possibly be affected by the proposed
expansion. They are as follows:
• Coast Highway/Jamboree Road
• Santa Barbara/Jamboree Road
• San Joaquin Hills Road/Jamboree Road
• Ford Road/Jamboree Road
• Bison Avenue/Jamboree Road
• University Drive/Jamboree Road
• Bristol Street/Jamboree Road
• Bristol Street North/Jamboree Road
• MacArthur Boulevard/Jamboree Road
• MacArthur Boulevard/Bison Avenue
• MacArthur Boulevard/Ford Road
Each intersection listed above was analyzed in this report.
D. 1% Test
In order to determine if the additional Project Traffic would significantly contribute to existing
traffic flow, a 1%Traffic Volume Analysis, as defined by the City, was performed during AM Peak
Hour and PM Peak Hour for each of the I I intersections. Existing Peak 2 1/2 Hour volumes and
Approved Projects Peak 2 1/2 Hour volumes were calculated by the City of'Newport Beach. Peak
2 1/2 Hour Regional Growth Volume was calculated using the information in Table 6. Project Peak
2 1/2 Hour Volume was calculated by using the Trip Distribution rates for a 1-hour peak and
multiplying only by 2, since most traffic will arrive and depart during the one hour interval.
If the Project Traffic is less than 1% of the Projected Peak, no further analysis is needed. However,
if it is greater,Intersection Capacity Utilization(ICU) Analysis is required. The Analysis Charts can
be found in Appendix 2. A summary of the results are listed in Table 7.
13 to
j3�
7: 1 96 TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS RESULTS
TABLE
ICU Analysis
Intersection Peak Hour Needed?
Coast Highway/Jamboree Road AM NO
PM NO
Santa Barbara/Jamboree Road AM NO
PM NO
San Joaquin Hill Road/Jamboree Road AM NO
PM NO
Ford Road/Jamboree Road AM NO
PM NO
Bison Avenue/Jamboree Road AM YES
PM YES
University Drive/Jamboree Road AM NO
PM NO
Bristol Street/Jamboree Road AM, NO
PM NO
Bristol Street North/Jamboree Road AM NO
PM NO
MacArthur Boulevard/Jamboree Road AM NO
PM NO
MacArthur Boulevard/Bison Avenue AM NO
PM YES
MacArthur Boulevard/Ford Road AM NO
PM NO
E. ICU Test
Those intersections that were shown to be affected by the additional project traffic during the 1%
test were further analyzed using the Intersection Capacity Utilization method. Three tests were run
and the results are summarized in Table 8. As per the City of Newport Beach's directions, values
in the table do not include the .05 clearance. ICU sheets can be found in Appendix 3.
14
'57
i
TABLE 3: INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION TEST RESULTS*
ICU VALUES ICU VALUES ICU VALUES
INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR EXISTING _ EXISTING PLUS OTHER " EXISTING PLUS OTHER"
PROJECT
BISON AVENUE/JAMBOREE ROAD AM .62 .75 .75
PM .58 .71 .71
MACARTHUR BLVD/BISON AVENUE PM .65 .80 .80
.d
ICU VALUES SHOWN'DO NOT INCLUDE.05 CLEARANCE
"OTHER = REGIONAL GROWTH PLUS COMMITTED PROJECTS
I
W
r r • •
MITIGATIONS '
None of the key intersections studied resulted in an inappropriate Level of Service. The additional
traffic generated from the proposed expansion will not create traffic beyond the standards established
by the Traffic Phasing Ordinance.
ON SITE CIRCULATION AND PARKING
Although the proposed expansion will generate 173 additional trips, the Toyota Motor Corporation
seems to have accounted for this. One of their consultants performed a parking analysis of the j
expansion which is included in Appendix 4. An additional 60 parking spaces are to be added to the
existing 188. Parking is also available in the adjacent church site through a previous agreement. No
improvements to the proposed on site circulation and parking appear necessary.
SITE ACIPESS
One main entrance/exit exists on the southeast corner of the lot. The only other access to the site
is through the Mariners' Church parking lot. Together, both seem adequate to accommodate the
increase in trips as a result of the expansion.
1
16
3b
�n
SUMMARY
The proposed expansion of the CALTY/Toyota site and increased trip generation will have virtually
no impact on existing traffic flow on the adjacent street system. It should be noted that the traffic
calculations are based on a conservative approach using the ITE rates in lieu of the City's.
17
3�
Y Y
APPENDIX 1
COMMITTED PRbJECTS
Y
Nq
8114 / 89 ' ;
' TRAFFIC PHASING INANCE •
REPORT ON APPROVED OJECT VOLUMES
PROJ-NBR ALL PROJECTS ON FILE: APPROVED VOLUME IS WEIGHTED...,6Y:
001 HUGHES AIRCRAFT 41 100% OCCUPANCY
002 SUNSETTEU 000% OCCUPANCY
003 FAR WEST SAVINGS AND LOAN 100% OCCUPANCY
004 SUPERSEDED 000% OCCUPANCY
005 AERONUTRONIC FORD 080% OCCUPANCY
00b BACK BAY OFFICE 100% OCCUPANCY
U07 BOYLE ENGINEERING 100% OCCUPANCY
008 CAL CANADIAN BANK 100% OCCUPANCY
009 CIVIC PLAZA 075% OCCUPANCY
OLD CORPORATE PLAZA 030% OCCUPANCY
O11 KOLL CENTER NEWPORT 100% OCCUPANCY
012 MACARTHUR COURT •032% OCCUPANCY
013 NATIONAL' EDUCATION OFFICE 000% OCCUPANCY
014 NORTH FORD 000% OCCUPANCY
015 ORCHARD OFFICE 100% OCCUPANCY
016 PACIFIC MUTUAL PLAZA 100% OCCUPANCY
017 3701 BIRCH OFFICE 100% OCCUPANCY
010 NEWPORT PLACE 077% OCCUPANCY
019 SUNSLTTED 00U% OCCUPANCY
020 BANK OF NEWPORT 100% OCCUPANCY
021 OAYSI0C SQUARE 100% OCCUPANCY
022 SEA ISLAND 037% OCCUPANCY
023 BAYWOOD APARTMENTS 100% OCCUPANCY
024 HARBOR POINT HOMES 025% OCCUPANCY
025 ROGER'S GARDENS 100% OCCUPANCY
026 SEAVIEW LUTHERAN PLAZA 100% .00CUPANCY
027 RUDY BARON 100% OCCUPANCY
028 QUAIL BUSINESS CENTER 100% OCCUPANCY
029 441 NEWPORT BLVD. 100% OCCUPANCY
030 MARTHA' S VINEYARD OOOX OCCUPANCY
031 VALnEZ 000% OCCUPANCY
032 COA.ST BUSINESS CENTER 005% OCCUPANCY
033 KOLL CENTER NPT NO. 1 TPP 000% OCCUPANCY
034 SEE PROJECTS 340 TO 343 000% OCCUPANCY
035 ROSS MOLLARD 040% OCCUPANCY
036 SUNSF_TTCD 000% OCCUPANCY
039 HUGHES AIRCRAFT 42 100% OCCUPANCY
040 SUPERCEDED 100% OCCUPANCY
041 FLAGSHIP HOSPITAL 100% OCCUPANCY
042 BIG CANYON 10 024% OCCUPANCY
043 FUN ZONE 100% OCCUPANCY
U44 MARRI07T HOTEL
100% OCCUPANCY
U45 ST. ANDREWS CHURCH 100% OCCUPANCY
046 YMCA 000% OCCUPANCY
047 ALLRED CONDOS 100% OCCUPANCY
048 MORGAN DEVELOPMENT 190% OCCUPANCY
049 FOUR SEASONS HOTEL lOBX OCCUPANCY
050 UNIV ATH CLUB TPP 4 EMKAY 100% OCCUPANCY
051 BLOCK. 400 MEDICAL 100% OCCUPANCY
052 SHERATON. EXPANSION 000% OCCUPANCY
8/iq /89
TRAFFIC PHASING O&NANCE •
REPORT UN APPROVED PROJECT VOLUMES
033 SEE PROJECTS 530 TO 533 000% OCCUPANCY
054 AMEND NO 1 MCARTHUR COURT 052% OCCUPANCY
OCCUPANCY
056 AMENDMENT NO 2 FORD AERa, 100%
057 CARVER GRANVILLE OFFICE" 100% OCCUPANCY
058 CORONA DEL MAR HOMES 100% OCCUPANCY
059 BIG CANYON VILLA APTS. 000% OCCUPANCY
% OCCUPANCY
061; 1400 DOVE STREET 000 DOD% OCCUPANCY
061 1100 QUAIL STREET 0
062 SUPERSEDED 00% OCCUPANCY
063 KOLL CENTER TPP AMEND. 4A 000% OCCUPANCY
064 SUNSETTED 100% OCCUPANCY
065 ROSAN'S DEVELOPMENT 090% OCCUPANCY
066 BLOCK 500 NPT CTR PROJ 100% OCCUPANCY
068 NEWPORT AQUATICS CENTER 45% OCCUPANCY
% OCCUPANCY
0 0
69 2600 E COAST HWY 0 OCCUPANCY
070 JASMINE PARK 100%00% OCCUPANCY
U71 SUNSETTED
072 NEWPORTER INN EXPANSION 100% OCCUPANCY
00% OCCUPANCY
073 SUNSETTED 000% OCCUPANCY
074 SUNSETTED 075 FASHION IS RENAISSANCE 030% OCCUPANCY
lOUX OCCUPANCY
07o SUNSETTED 100% OCCUPANCY
077 COM SENIOR PROJECT 100% OCCUPANCY
07'B POINT DEL MAR 100% OCCUPANCY
079 PACIFIC CLUB
080 RIVERSIDE RETAIL BUILDING 001% OCCUPANCY
081 NEWPORT SEACREST APT 100% OCCUPANCY
082 ZOTH ST BED/BREAKFAST INN 001% OCCUPANCY
083 3800 CAMPUS DR( M-STORAGE ) 001% OCCUPANCY
% OCCUPANCY
G84 HOAG CANCER CENTER
085 EDWARDS NEWPORT CENTER 001% OCCUPANCY
086 SEASIDE APTS ( MESA II ) 100% OCCUPANCY
087 VICTORIA STATION ( OFFICE ) lop% OCCUPANCY
088 3760 CAMPUS DR( M-STORAGE ) 001% OCCUPANCY
001% OCCUPANCY
089 NEWPORT IMPORTS OCCUPANCY
U90 NEWPORT PLACE TOWER 001001%%% OCCUPANCY
091 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE
092 MARINERS• MILE MARINE CTR 040% OCCUPANCY
093 15TH STREET APARTMENTS 100% OCCUPANCY
094 SEASIDE APARTMENTS III 000% OCCUPANCY
095 NPT BAY RETIREMENT INN 000% OCCUPANCY
00% OCCUPANCY
096 NEWPORT CLASSIC INN
097 MARINERS CHURCH EXPANSION 000% OCCUPANCY
000% OCCUPANCY
098 NCLACHLAN-NEWPORT PL 000% OCCUPANCY
U99 1501 SUPERIOR MEDICAL 000% OCCUPANCY
100 FASHION ISLAND 42 % OCCUPANCY
101 NEWPORTER RESORT EXPAND. 000 DOD% OCCUPANCY
102 TACO BELL
103 NEWPORT LIDO MED CENTER 000% OCCUPANCY
000% OCCUPANCY
104 VILLA POINT 000% OCCUPANCY
106
SHOKRI 15TH ST APTS 000% OCCUPANCY
107 ItOCKWELL EXPANSION U00% OCCUPANCY
' TRAFFIC PHASING *NANCE
REPORT ON APPROVED PROJECT VOLUMES
108 ANDREW RESTAURANT 000% OCCUPANCY
109 BALBOA / WASHINGTON 000% OCCUPANCY
340 AMENDMENT NO. 1 FORD AEtj4 100% OCCUPANCY
341 AMENDMENT NO. 1 FORD AERO 000% OCCUPANCY
342 AMENDMENT NO. 1 FORD AERO 000% OCCUPANCY
343 AMENDMENT NO. 1 FORD AERO 000% OCCUPANCY
530 AMENDMENT NO 1 NORTH FORD 100% OCCUPANCY
531 AMENDMENT NO 1 NORTH FORD 100% OCCUPANCY
532 AMENDMENT NO 1 NORTH FORD 100% OCCUPANCY
533 AMENDMENT NO 1 NORTH FORD 000% OCCUPANCY
910 NEWPORT DUNES 000% OCCUPANCY
920 BAYVIEW 000% OCCUPANCY
930 CITY OF IRVINE DEV. 000% OCCUPANCY
Div
/l4/8q
APPENDIX 2
1% TEST SHEETS
i
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection COAST HIGHWAY JAMBOREE RD
(Existing Traffic Volumes s-ea on verage Winter/Spring 19 89) AM
Peak 2h Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1G of ProjectTProject
Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2y Hour ' eakol
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
Northbound 1514 Z
Southbound 2242 95 50 !0 /2/7-8—( 278
Eastbound Z3 Q �5 l0 V v J �— ,� ` '�
5690
Westbound 5 2Q C 31 ( 7 I I ' 0
2762 —_— ---
Project Traffic is estimated -to bg less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2;k Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required.
• I
+ DATE:
PROJECT: IOYOrtA EXC� 1iNSION eft'CA FORM I
1'; A 8/loll 9
Y Y
1% Traffic Volume.Analysis
dntersection COAST HIGHWAY JAMBOREE RD
(Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage InterSpring 19 89)PM
Peak 21s Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1�Peak
Projected Project
Direction Peak 24 Hour Growth Peak 2k, Hour Peak 2ts Hour Peak 2�i Hour Peek 2y Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
Northbound 1009 (d
zi 1030 i O O
Southbound 4522 —I I —702— 53 10
Eastbound 4918 - - ' 835 585Z 59 , 0
Westbound g 3 23 513 2. 51 ' U
i 4526 ---
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2}2 Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
DATE:
PROJECT: TQYoTA EXPAIVSION ( 7e
FORM I
r'
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
dntersection JAMBOREE RD/SANTA BARBARA DR
(Existing Traffic Volumes Daseo on Avt0up inter prin9 9 — AM
Peak 24 Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1pack Zij°Hourad Peak 2�cNour
Peak 2k Hour Peak 2), Hoyr yotume Volume
Direction Peek 24 Hour Voollume Volume Volume
rowth
Volume 5� '
Northbound 4668 9 9 �QQ�
Southbound G3 (0bo
3148
Eastbound __ 1
Westbound 480 — 3—I S (9
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2�2 Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 24 Hour'Traffic Volume. ,•Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required. .,,
DATE: D
PROJECT: -TdY()TA fjNSl�N ( �� �r�� FORM 1
i 3iA
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection JAMBOREE RD/SANTA BARBARA DR
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pring 9 89 PM
Peak 21s Hour Approved
hpproach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 2$ Hour Peak 24 Hour Peak
kolum Hour Peak ;Hour
Volume Volume // Volume Volume Volume
!
Northbound 2682 59 � V�� (nr) ✓ 6 I �� O
southbound 4303 IOv� A•' 11,
` I rJ I
Eastbound 0 V C) �7� O
Westbound Q Z17 2I q � `Z O
! 1975 -•-
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected _
Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. - Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.''
`iK
DATE:
PROJECT: t O` OTA FA pfl N S l0 r\J C �->e- I t-A FORM I
•
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
dntersection JAMBOREE RD SAN JOA UIN HILLS RD
(Existing Traffic Volumes base on verage Jlnter pring 19 89jA
Peak 2k Hour Approved
PpprontE
Re91ana1 Projects Projected 1� of Projected Project L'irectiur Growth Penk 2�S Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 21y Hour Peak 2�SHOur VolumeVolume Volume VolumeVolume
Northbou �QQ� 7 /\
Southbound 4119 V +r,�
Eastbound 698 Q �v
- -- 130 13 �14 13 O
Westbound 1210
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
® Peak 21i Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 21� Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required.
DATE: 8II1-1
PROJECT: --TO Y(j7A Fx N/9 0S f G NJ me ito� / FORM I ��
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection JAMBOREE RD/SAN JOAQUIN HILLS RD
(Existing Traffic Volumes Dasea on Averavc winter/Spring 19 89)PM
Peak 2k Hour Approved
A
pproach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project
rowth
Peak 2k Hour VGrowth olume PeaVolumeour PeaVolumeour PeaVolumeour PeaVolumeour
Volume —oluound I � 1I3521 _bound 59 1210 -T 1
Eastbound 443 0 W 9pQ��j1
Westbound 713� O ` Sg I 9 _ I y
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
El Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated 'to. b'e greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required. "
I�
♦�y a
DATE:
PROJECT: 'OY OT'q FORM I l�
0 0
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection JAMBOREE RD/EgkBLUFF DR—FORD RD
(Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage Inter Pring 19 89 AM
Peak 2's Hour Approvedl
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1peak 2�S Hour 7Peparkl� Hour
Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 2�, Hour PeaVolumeour volume Volume
Volume Volume Volume I
i
Northbound 5878 I 8� G 7 (09 8
QQ 92 ; 2
southbound 3442 G57 I �u
I �
Eastbound 1289
0
3 ► I __
Westbound 908 ! _ U _ I
Project Traffic is estimated to be, less than 1% of Project
ed
LE J Peak 2: Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity acity
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required. _
DATE:
PROJECT: —TG'l J*T/; r/ i f 1 r` )(i iv ( De I _f-CA_� FORM I
II
�� r
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection JAMBOREE RD/EASTBLUFF DR—FORD RD
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pring 19 _ PM
r Peak 24 Hour Approved
Ppproach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project' I
Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 21s Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2 Hour Peak 2u Hour
Volume Volume QVolume Volume Volume Volume
Northbound 5515 IGG 823 ��� O
Southbound 4741 Q"� I � �� (900 ""' ( O
i 0
Eastbound 1461
i
t
Westbound 786
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
(l Peak 2)-2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required.,
DATE:
PROJECT: jMQ7A FAPArISIUN ( Dclf-00 FORM I ��
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
t
Intersection JAMBOREE RD/BISON AV
(Existing Traffic Volumes basedra
on vege Inter pring 19 89 AM
Peak 2�&kJ
ed
A
pproach Existing Regiots Projected 1� of ProjectedFPepark
oject
Direction Peek 2y Hour GrowPeakHour Peak 2�S Hour PeaVotume 2)1 our olumeour
Volume Volumee Volunme
-I5�L' 5 4641 9859Uthbound 4010 ��astbound 3-37 0317s7z8Westbound513 'O — -"
r- 1 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
U Peak 2?� Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
`+K
DATE-
PROJECT:-
YQT4 EXp4 C SioY�J FORM I s'
J ( �
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
dntersection JAMBOREE RD BISON AV
(Existing Traffic Volumes Eased on Average Inter pring 19 89) PM
Peak 21s Hour Approved
hpproach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2+- Hour Peak 2k Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
�9 6
Northbound 4255 l5�� L' 5�.
Southbound 4826 — q T 1 13 u/0(0 b
Eastbound 216 C� O
Westbound 580
_ --- —
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2}2 Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
DATE: pimiI�rl
PROJECT: -MYUT� �Xp� �S�CJh / ���-11��� FORM I a
'�O C /7 ]V
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
dntersection JAMBOREE RD/EASTBLUFF DR—UNIVERSITY DR
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average- Winter pring 19 89 AM
Peak 2� Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 10. of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 211 Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2k Maur
Volume Volluume pVolume Volume Volume /Volume
81
Northbound 4304 V7Q 5p2&5 53 I l0
southbound 4861_ i g 8 75 5 U��.1 5 39
Eastbound 917 O F GO 1 07 ( � � � i O _
' Westbound 1858 — — O 2 _ ' O ` _..._ O
I
fIK�A1 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Wi Peak 2}z Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 23-2 Hour Traffic Volume... Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required., `
DATE:
PROJECT: —MYQTA Ex P/g lvsi ON ( Ce i jo)
�r� FORM I
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection JAMBOREE RD/EA5TBLUFF DR—UNIVERSITY DR
(Existing Traffic Volumes ase on Verage Inter pring 9 89 PM
Peak 2u, Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected It of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 215 Hour Peak 2% Hour Peek 2)s Hour Peak 2h Hour
Volume Volume OVolume //Vo(/ll�ume Volume Volume
Northbound Q 8 77 �O�/Z 1 iOL) ! ��
5043
Southbound 6241 2 27'JS, 7-0-1 1} 7(
Eastbound 747 Q ' J I80 ! ' O
/ i
Westbound 6 5 1 (9 71 ' U
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be 'greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 2;1 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
DATE:
PROJECT: - T"OYOTA EX PA JVS I o ru C)flfa� FORM I
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection JAMBOREE RD/B]�ISTOL ST
(Existing Traffic Volumes ase on Average Winteribpring 19 89 AM
:Peak 2h Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project �,
Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peat/ lumeour PeaVolumeour PeaVolumeour I PeaVolumek 2k our
Volume volume
gg 1. Cod G7 '
Northbound 5669 �� /,
southbound 83u ( 7 780 to Z 7 W 2
Eastbound 6335 ( 1�Cj 7599 ! Vo 22
Westbound — — —
Project Traffic is estimated to be,•less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
DATE:
PROJECT:-0llO7P -Px P/ rj S 1 O I V ` C FORM I 1
7
l � '
•
1 Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection JAMBOREE RD/BAISTOL ST
(Existing Traffic Volumes ase on Average Inter pring 19 89 PM
Peak 24 Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1. of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 2u Hour PeaVolumeour PeaVolumeour i PeaVolumeour
Volume Volume //
Northbound 5141 ( 03
50 79 �3 332 33 2
Southbound 4 8
Eastbound 4923
Westbound
rM Project Traffic is estimated to be ,less than 1% of Projected
V�qPeak 22 Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
DATE: ••^�i�� `�
PROJECT: IOYUTf� �xrFn�S �v `�ya) FORM I cl3
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection JAMBOREE RD/13RISTOL ST N
(Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage Inter pring 19 89 AM
Peak 2h Hour Approved
[Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% ofg
Project
ection Peak 2�S Nour Growth Peek 2�. Hour Peak 2k Hour PeaYeaVolumeour
Volume Volume Volume Volumethbound 8819 1 7 Z 9 9 M qthbound $ 3 10 O �� Z
Eastbound
Westbound `
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 211 Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Q Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required.
DATE: �II I YiGj
PROJECT: p�UTA EXpA N S I ON T�(' �Q,) FORM I
5,
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection JAMBOREE RD/BRISTOL ST NO
(Existing Traffic Volumes ase on Average Inter pring 19 89 PM
Peak 2k Hour Approved
[FNorthEound:
ach Existing Regional Projects Projected 10. of Projected Project
tion Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2;s Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2y Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
^7 6145
I 32
6866 � p3 1 I I 1 �
bound 4154 8 3 2 5 32 5 �'
Eastbound
Westbound _
Project Traffic is estimated to bp less than 1% of Projected
XN Peak 2; Hour Traffic Volume'
❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
III / r' /
DATE:
PROJECT: 10YOTH E,k1'fjN'S1CIV' � Dc1ta) FORM I
5
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection JAMBOREE RD .TfACARTHUR BL
(Existing Traffic Volumes ase on Average winter/Spring 19 89 AM
Peak 2y Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 23, Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2y Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
Northbound 2119 21-7 ✓7V 2CCq '
5outhbound 896 { 8 gcj87 { CJ 7�j2Q
Eastbound 3363 �p8 { 2 f S �jV I
westbound 1746 70O
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to bd greater than 1% of Projected
[] Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required: .
,
DATE: fs2
PROJECT: (QYOT/9 �Xr� {V Ulu ( De1tCA
FORM I
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
$ntersection JAMBOREE RD/MACARTHUR BL In 19 PM
(Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage Winter pr g -_
Peak 215 Hour Approved
Poects Projected 1% of Projected Project �
hpproach Existing Regional Peak 2e. Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2)1 Hour Peakolumeour •I
Direction Peak 2K Hour Growth Volume Volume Volume
Volume II Volume —
Northbound F �I �� � �
1182---•- (� V� qU 2
sorthbound 3000 2 '
3 8 �3 282q ' 2S i
I Eastbound 1927 •• ,__
4{ — — O
280 93
Westbound 3337 -- _ - ---
rvr Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume.' Intersection Capacity Utilization
(i.C.U.) Analysis is required.
DATE: bli-I / bq —
PROJECT: 70W-F/A EJ( 91 PJC l0 I",J j j-Cd• FORM I U 0
1% Traffic Volume Analysis I
Intersection MACARTHUR BL/BISON AV
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on verage inter pring 19 _ AM I
Peak 2y Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project
Direction Peak 21s Hour Growth Peak 2)1 Hour Peak 21s Hour Peak 'g Hour Peak 2k Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
nn LI a45 5 8�j ; 8 '
Northbound 7508 7 I 55 3 i
southbound 4883 5QQ 527 5q l0 5q l
Eastbound 465 0
Mgstbound -- Q 22 2 z Q
Q
Project Traffic is estimated to be less khan 1% of Projected
Peak 2� Hour Traffic Volume
❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U:) Analysis is required.
DATE: �. /ICl /i' -• _
PROJECT: r c
-rQyvTA EX�/� I .1 � IDN Fs)cIta) FORM I
, j .
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
intersection MACARTHUR BL/BISON AV
(Existing' Traffic Volumes based on Average inter .pring 9' 89 M
Peak 2� Hour Approved
LEastbound
ach Existing Regional Projects Projected 10. of Prgjected Project
tion Peak 2h Hour Growth Peak 2>4 Hour Peak 2k lour Peak 2h.'Hnur Peak 24 Hoyr
Volume Volume Volume Volume volume Volume
458 4 � 2 5922 54 2 ound 4472 -7ound 6 42 (j 30 CD97 -741 ! 0
g43ound
n' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
t Peak 24 Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% 4f Projected
Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. * Intersection Capaciq Utilizatipn
(I.C.O,.) Analysis is required.
-1-4
DATE•
PROJECT: �0 j�� Cx FF1 ifs U N ( C)P ltCk 3'4
FORI4 I Lp
1% Traffic Volume A6alysil
Intersection M-—',RTHUIt- BL/FORD RD
(Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage Inter prin9 1 87A11
Peak 2� Hour Approved
FDAroach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1� of Projected peak IkcHour
th Peak 2�. Hour Peak 24 Hour Peak 2� H6ur Votume
Girectipn Peak 2!y Hour Vo a Volume Volume Volume' i
Volume
Northbound 6101
Southbound 4346 • '7� �� ` 5Z�2 S
0 �
'Eastbound 472 '
V{estbaund 2268
c�5 29 33 Z� o
roject Traffic is estimated
to be less than 1% of Projected
P
Projegt Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak ?� Hour Traffic Volume. . Intersection Capacity Utilizatiop
(I.C.p.,) Analysis is required.
DATE:
PROJECT: 1T YNT � Ex �t911.) � •IoI\.) ( Dt IICA FORM I 3
t
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
dntgrsection MACARTHUR BL/FORD RD
((Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pring 19 89 PM
--
Peak 24 Hour Approved I
bpproach Existing ,, Regional Projects P ojected 10. of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2$ Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak
me
PeaVolumeour
Volume Volume Volume Volume
q 9 q 5`I r� 537 59 2
Northbound 4384 ^�
souj.hbound �D 3 / j 72-2 3 ` Z �(�
Eastbound 842_• _ U 6472
3l0 87� I �_ `�
p ► �9 10 U
Westbound 1007 42
Project Traffic is estimated to •be less than 1% of Projected
. Peak 21i Hour Traffic Volume
Cl
Project Traffic is estimated to 'be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 2; Hour Traffic -Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.' ,.
DATE: PAf ��1
PROJECT: -T"Y"T/q E; p /9 oii .'S IU Iv L Delta) FORM I V�
3"1 G• •
APPENDIX 3
ICU CALCULATIOI i SHEETS
w"
. r
/
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT: TOYOTA EXPANISON
INTERVAL: AM PEAK HOUR (DELTA ONLY)
INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD & BISON STREET
,----•r--------•.----.-•----------------------------••------•--------------•--.-------•-----••-----.--------------•---------
II II 1 II 1 II 1 1 II 1 1EXISTING I IEX.+OTHERI IEX.+O 1
IIMOVEMENT 11EXIST I PROP 11EXISTING IPROPOSED 11EXISTING I OTHER I PROJECT 11EXISTING 1 1+ OTHER I I+PROJECT I I+PROJ
II 11LANES ILANES 11CAPACITY ICAPACITY 11 VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME 11 V/C I I V/C I I V/C I IV/C-W
Ilxcxazx===11x=====lx===z=11===x==cc-Izccs=x=cllxxxc=c-xl==xezc=.Iz=c-x=xe=1l=====x===1=z1=c===x=-=1=x1===x=xz=1==1=====
II NL 11 1 1 D II 1600 ( 0 11 18 1 0 1 0 11 0.01 1 1 0.01 I I 0.01 I I
II NT II 3 1 0 II 4800 1 0 11 2180 1 490 I 0 11 0.45 1* I 0.56 1* I 0.56 I. 1
II NR II 01 011 01 011 01 01 411 I I I I I 1
II SL II 2 I 0 II 3200 1 0 11 95 I 30 I 17 11 0.03 (* I 0.04 1* I 0.04
II ST II 3 1 0 II 4800 1 0 11 1656 ( 389 1 0 II 0.35 1 1 0.43 I I 0.43 I I
II SR II 1I 011 1600I 011 281 1I 011 0.021 1 0.021 I 0.021 I
II EL II 01 011 01 011 01 01 011 I I I I I I
II ET II 1 I 0 II 1600 1 0 1I 135 I 7 I 0 11 0.08 I" I 0.09 1" 1 0.09 1" 1
II ER II 01 011 01 011 01 01 011 ► I I I I I
II NL II 1 I 0 II 1600 1 0 11 93 1 8 1 1 II 0.06 I* I 0.06 I" 1 0.06 I* I
II WT II 1 1 0 I1 1600 I 0 11 43 I 3 1 0 11 0.03 1 1 0.03 1 1 0.03 1 1
II NR II 2 1 0 II 3200 1 0 (1 .101 I 17 I 3 11 0.03 1 1 0.04 1 1 0.04 1 1
-II = =
--------- NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.48 1 0.60 1 0.60 I' 0
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAMEIDJAMB[SRMI II----••-----••-
-.-- ----•---•-.
--------- EAST/NEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.14 1 0.15 1 0.15 1 0 i
N = NORTHBOUND, S x SOUTHBOUND II---.•---------------------------------------
E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = 11 0.05 1 0.05 i 0.05 I 0
L x LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT
H.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE x II 0.67 I 0.80 I 0.80 I 0
LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II'.......................:...................
* DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II B I C I C I
OTHER = GROWTH + COMMITTED PROJECTS
I
I
^Ry
Q '
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT: TOYOTA EXPANSION
INTERVAL: PM PEAK HOUR (DELTA ONLY)
INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD & BISON STREET
......................................................
II II I II 1 II 1 1 II I (EXISTING I IEX.+OTHER] IEX.+O
11MOVEMENT 11EXIST I PROP 11EXISTING (PROPOSED 11EXISTING I OTHER I PROJECT 11EXISTING 1 1+ OTHER I I+PROJECT i IV/COW
II ]ILANES ILANES 11CAPACITY ICAPACITY 11 VOLUME 1 VOLUME 1 VOLUME 11 WC I I V/C I 1
�i NL ---11 1 1 0 11 1600 1 0 11 35 1 1 1 0 11 0.02 1" 1 0.02 1" 1 0.02 I*
II NT 11 3 1 0 11 4800 1 0 11 2019 1 459 1 0 11 0.42 I I 0.52 11 0.52 1
NR 11 0 1 0 11 01 011 01 01 OII I I I I I
II SL 11 2 1 0 11 3200 1 0 11 117 1 36 i 2 11 0.04 1 1 0.05 I ] 0.05 I
11 ST 11 3 1 0 11 4800 1 0 11 2150 1 583 1 0 11 0.45 1. 1 0.57 1* 1 0.57 I"
II SR 11 1 I 0 1I 1600 I 0 11 69 1 ' B I 0 11 0.04 1 1 0.05 1 1 0.05 ]
II EL II of 0 of oll OI of 011 1 1 I I I I
II ET II 1 1 0 II 1600 1 0 11 74 1 2 I 0 11 0.05 1* 1 o.os 1* 1 o.os 1* I
I� ER II 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 94 i 14 1 5 11 0.06 1* 1 0.07 1* 1 0.07 1*
I I WT 1 I 0 I I 1600 1 0 11 49 1 1 I 0 I I 0.03 1 1 0.03 1 1 0.03 1
11 WR II 2 I 0 11 3200 I 0 11 62 1 46 1 16 11 0.02 1 i 0,
_ .. -
.................................................
. NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = 11 0.47 1 0.59 I 0.59 0
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAMEIDJAMBISPMI II"'
EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = 11 0.11 1 0.12 I 0.12 1 0
H = NORTHBOUND, S = SORTHBOUND 11 0.05 ..1 0.05 1 0.05 h 0
E = EASTBOUND, W - WESTBOUND CLEARANCE _
L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT
H.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.63 I 0.7& 1 0.76 I 0
LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE B 1 C I�
* DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II I C
OTHER = GROWTH + COMMITTED PROJECTS =_------
i
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT: TOYOTA EXPANSION
INTERVAL: PM PEAK HOUR (DELTA ONLY)
INTERSECTION: MACARTHUR BOULEVARD AND BISON AVENUE
__ _____ ______ _ ......_....__-.__--_.._._.__...__...__.._.-___..._.....__.._..._._..._._._..._...._-__i
II II 1 II I II I I II I (EXISTING I IEX.+OTHERI I�X.+O
11MOVEMENT IIEXIST I PROP IIEXISTING IPROPOSED IIEXISTING I OTHER I PROJECT IIEXISTING I I+ OTHER I I+PROJECT I 14PROJ
!I IILANES ILANES ((CAPACITY ICAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME 11 V/C I I V/C I I V/C I 1y/C-W
II 'NL 11 1 1 D II 1600 I 0 II 118 I 27 I 1 II 0.07 I I 0.09 11 0.09 I I,
II NT 11 2 I 0 II 3200 I 0 II 1847 I 414 I 0 II 0.58 I* ( 0.71 I* I 0.71 I* I
I I NR I I 0 1 0 11 0 1 0 I I 0 1 0, I 0 11 I I I I I I
II SL II 0 1 0 11 0 1 0 11 0 1 0 1 0 11 I* I I• I I• I
II ST II 41 0II 6400I 011 2905I 587I OII 0.45I I 0.55I I 0.55I I
II SR IIN.S. I 0 II N.S. I 0 II 97 I 48 i 0 II N.S. I I N.S. 1 1 N.S. I I�
11 EL II 2 I 0 II 3200 I 0 II 232 I 52 I 3 II 0.07 I* I 0.09 I* I 0.09
II ET II 01 011 01 011 01 01 011
II ER Ilx.s. I O II N.S. I O II 132 ( 31 I 4 11 N.S. I I N.S. I I N.S. I Ij
II WL II 01 011 01 011 01 01 011
II NT II 0 1 0 II 0 1 0 II 0 1 0 1 0 II I• I I• I I• li
II WR II 01 011 01 011 01 01 011 I I I I I I!
......... NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.58 1 0.71 I 0.71 I�
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAMEIOMACSISPMI II' - -' -- ---- -• - �•
......... EAST/NEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.07 I 0.09 1 0.09 1; 0
N = NORTHBOUND, S - SORTHBOUND II------------•-•---• "'^_-•-_
E = EASTBDUND, N = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 i! 0
L '= LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT
N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE - II 0.70 I 0.85 I .0.85 I. 0
LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II�------ ------------ --•-_----- -•_.--_-----
* DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II B I D I D I'
OTHER = GROWTH AND COMMITTED PROJECTS -----
• - R
APPENDIX 4
PARKING ANALYSIS
i
I
i
i
1
i
i
i
i
1
i
I
h.'
M
e/19/c t
MEMORANDUM
TO: Project File 89102
CALTY/Toyota
FROM: Tom Andreoli
DATE: April 11, 1989
SUBJECT: Parking Analysis
On the above mentioned date, an updated parking analysis was performed on the Toyota CALTY project.
The North Ford P.C.D.was used for Information concerning parking. Both existing conditions and
proposed construction were addressed. Below represents a summary of Information obtained.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
I
BUILDING A- OFFICE- 12,295 SF
RESEARCH- 3,720 F
16,015 SF TOTAL
BUILDING C- OFFICE/STUDIO- 16,594 SF
SHOPS- 8.586 SF
25,180 SF TOTAL
TOTAL EXISTING SQUARE FOOTAGE- 41,195 SF
(DOES NOT INCLUDE OUTDOOR STORAGE)
TOTAL EXISTING PARKING SPACES- 188 SPACES
NEW CONDITIONS
BUILDING A- OFFICE- 6,581 SF
(REMODEL) PARKING @ 1:225 SF = 29.25 SPACES
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT- 9,434 SF + 625 (NEW)
PARKING @ 3:1,000 SF = 30.18 SPACES
TOTAL SPACES FOOTAGE- 16,640 SF
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED = 59 SPACES
BUILDING B- RESEARCH&DEVELOPMENT- 36,047 SF
(NEW BLDG) PARKING @ 3:1,006 SF = 108 SPACES
TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE- 36,047 SF
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED = 108 SPACES
,. Memorandum: 89102
April 11, 1989
Pagetwo
BUILDING C- OFFICE- 4,092 SF
(REMODEL) PARKING @ 1:225 SF = 18.19 SPACES
MANUFACTURE/RESEARCH- 21,088 SF
PARKING @ 3:1.000 = ' 63.26
TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE- 25.180 SF
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED = 81 SPACES
TOTAL SITE (3 BUILDINGS) SQUARE FOOTAGE- 77,867 SF
TOTAL SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED = 248 SPACES
This analysis represents the most restrictive requirements for the CALTY/Toyota site. There are provisions
in the North Ford P.C.D.that allow for reductions in the parking count. As an example, parking in office
use may be lowered to 1:250 SF instead of 1:225 SP for net area by review and approval of the modification
committee. Parking In Manufacture/Research use can be two spaces per each three employees. The
occupant count would have to be verified from the Employer records and covenanted to the City as being
the most employees to be employed on the site at any one time. i
I
cc: Daniel Alexander
Bob Gilley
i
I
I
' i
h • November 9, 1989
COMMISSIONERS • MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH DRAFT
OLL CALL INDEX
s Hewicker, Planning Director, stated that the applicant has
reque; at this item be continued to the December 7, 1989,
Planning Co on meeting in order to resolve problems
regarding grading an ng on the site.
Motion was made and voted on tome this item to the
December 7, 1989, Planning Commission ing. MOTION i
CARRIED. j
A General Plan Amendment 88-2-(B) (Public Hearing) IItem No.11
Request to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan A 88-211
so as to allow 40,672± square feet of additional development for T 57
research and development, and manufacturing purposes in
conjunction with the existing Toyota design facility located within A678
Area 1 of the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community. -�-
AND �Approved
B. Traffic Study No 57 (Public Hearing)
i
Request to approve a traffic study so as to permit an additional
40,672± square feet of additional development for research and
development, and manufacturing purposes in conjunction with the
existing Toyota design facility located within Area 1 of the
North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community.
AND
C. Amendment No 678 (Public Hearing)
I
Request to amend the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned
Community Development Standards so as to allow 40,672±
square feet of additional development for research and
development, and manufacturing purposes in conjunction with the
existing Toyota design facility located within Area 1 of the North I
Ford Planned Community. The proposal also includes a request
to establish a specific parking requirement for automotive design
facilities within the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned
Community Development Standards.
LOCATION: Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 41-27 (Resubdivision
No. 328) located at 2800 - 2810 Jamboree
-30-
�e-
. • November 9, 1989
COMMISSIONERS MINUTES
0'0 �o�$•oe+ ,
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
OLL CALL INDEX
Road, on the southeasterly side of Jamboree
Road,between Bison Avenue and Camelback
Street, in the North Ford/San Diego Creek
Planned Community.
ZONE: P-C
APPLICANT: Rossetti Associates, Architects and Planners,
Santa Monica '
OWNER: Toyota Motor Sales USA, Torrance
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item and
Mr. Walter Meyer appeared before the Planning Commission on
behalf of the applicant. Mr. Meyer concurred with the suggested
action as stated in the staff report.
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the
public hearing was closed at this time.
Motion x Motion was made and voted on to adopt Resolution No. 1205 I
recommending to the City Council adoption of General Plan
Amendment 88-2 (B), amending the Land Use Element of the
Newport Beach General Plan increasing the allowable on-site
development at 2800 Jamboree Road by 40,672 square feet from
44,731 square feet to 85,403 square feet; adopt Resolution No.
1206 approving Amendment No. 678 and recommending to the
Ayes * * * City Council adoption of said application, as proposed; approve i
Absent * Traffic Study No. 57 with the following findings. MOTION
CARRIED.
FINDINGS:
i
1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which
analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the
circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40
of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and Council
Policy S-1. j
2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project-
generated traffic will neither cause nor make worse
an unsatisfactory level of traffic on any 'major',
'primary-modified', or 'primay street.
-31- � 3
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN
SO AS TO INCREASE THE ALLOWABLE ON-SITE DEVELOPMENT AT
2800 JAMBOREE ROAD BY 40,672 SQUARE FEET;
FROM 44,731 SQUARE FEET TO 85,403 SQUARE FEET
[General Plan Amendment No. 88-2(B)]
WHEREAS, as part of the development and implementation of the City's
General Plan, the Land Use Element has been prepared; and
WHEREAS, said element of the General Plan sets forth objectives and
supporting policies which serve as a guide for future development of the City
i
of Newport Beach; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 707 of the Charter of the City of
t
Newport Beach, the Planning Commission has held a duly noticed public hearing
to consider certain amendments to the above referenced element of the Newport ,
Beach General Plan; and ,
WHEREAS, it has been determined, pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act, that the project is exempt from the provisions of
CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the information
contained in the Planning Commission Staff Report and the Excerpt of the Planning t
Commission Minutes dated November 9, 1989, in making its decision on the proposed
amendment of the Land Use Element of the Newport Beach General Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Newport Beach that an amendment to the Land Use Element be approved as follows:
Increase the allowed on-site development at 2800 Jamboree Road by
40,672 sq.ft., from 44,731 sq.ft. to 85,403 sq.ft. The increased
development is allocated to Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 41-27 (Resub-
division 328) for expansion of the Calty Design Research, Inc. t
facility.
ADOPTED THIS day of , 1989. �
i
t
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
i
WRL/kk
A678-1.127 N1
1�
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
AMENDING THE NORTH FORD/SAN DIEGO CREEK PLANNED COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SO AS TO INCREASE THE ALLOWABLE DEVELOPMENT
WITHIN AREA 1 BY 40,672 SQUARE FEET FROM 44,731 SQUARE FEET
TO 85,403 SQUARE FEET; AND TO ESTABLISH A SPECIFIC
PARKING FORMULA FOR AUTOMOTIVE DESIGN FACILITIES
(planning Commission Amendment No. 678)
WHEREAS, Section 20.51.045 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code
provides that amendments to a Planned Community Development Plan must be
approved by a Resolution of the City Council, setting forth full particulars of
the amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has conducted a public hearing on
November 9, 1989, at which time this amendment to the North Ford/San Diego Creek
Planned Community Development Standards was discussed; and
1
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that the additional
development allocation of 40,672 square feet for Research and Development Uses
on property described as Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 41-27 (Resubdivision No. 328) ,
was appropriate; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that said additional
development will comply with the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the parking
.demand for Automotive Design Facilities is significantly lower than typical
industrial research and development uses, so as to ,justify a lower parking
formula of 1.7 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area; and
,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that said amendment j
I
to the Planned Community Development Standards for the North Ford/San Diego
,
Creek Planned Community, as set forth in the Planning Commission minutes of the
i
November 9, 1989 meeting is desirable; and
I
WHEREAS, the City of Newport Beach has conducted a public hearing i
on the proposed amendment in accordance with all provisions of the law; j
i
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Newport Beach hereby approves the proposed amendment to the Planned Community
Development Plan for the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned CommunityDevolopment
Standards, as reflected in the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of
November 9, 1989.
i
II
�� f
W 0
ADOPTED this day of November, 1989.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
1
i
WRL/kk
A678-1.127
i
i
1
1
i
i
2
1�
CALTY DESIGN RESEARCH, INC.
October27, 1989 2810 JAMBOREE ROAD
NEWRORTBEACH
CA 92660-3296
(7143 759-1701
James D. Hewicker
Planning Director
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, California 92658-8915
Dear Jim:
Per William Ward's request,we are providing this letter to further clarify the nature of our work and
further justify the reduction of parking in the expansion of our facility.
Calty Design Research is an automotive design firm which was founded sixteen years ago. In
1978 we moved to our current facility on Jamboree Road. Our name Calty is an amalgamation of
"California"and"Toyota".
Our task is to produce Conceptual Designs which are then sent to Toyota City,Japan for review,
refinement, and incorporation into automotive production.
For each design we produce sketches, renderings, multi-media presentations, and full size
models which are cast from clay mock ups. We accomplish these tasks with a relatively small staff
of thirty-five employees which has remained consistent for the past eleven years. We have
planned the expansion to accommodate any future growth which would total no more than
ninety-five employees over a five year period. Due to the nature of our work we require large
areas for the few people we employ.
We are a"design think tank"where designers will have many areas provided for their use. Each
design will have a design team which,during different phases of the process,will utilize drawing
stations,a library, large design studios,wood and metal shops, a paint booth, multi-media facilities
and conference rooms.
There are two types of visitors to the facility; material vendors and corporate visitors from Japan.
Neither group has a significant impact on the parking demand. Vendors are not encouraged due
to the high security level required around our designs. There are no more than four or five
vendors at one time at the facility. Each year corporate executives and designers from Japan visit
Casty for administrative coordination and design collaboration. The maximum number of people in
the visiting group is twenty-five and they share cars form the hotel. Therefore, twelve parking
spaces would be the maximum required. Once again, I would like to reiterate that we do not
encourage visitors due to the secretive nature of our work. Finally,we are constructing a very
specialized facility for a very specialized function. We have enjoyed the last eleven years here and
with the expansion do not anticipate any relocation in the future.
I hope this explanation of CALTY will be helpful in reviewing the project.
Sincerely, API
'
Mr. Hiroaki Ohba
Executive Vice-President
CALTY DESIGN RESEARCH, INC.
HO/ih
Rossetti AssoG*es I Architects Planners •
1437 Seventh Street,Santa Monica,California 90401
Telephone(213)458-2927
October 24, 1989
Patricia Lee Temple
Principal Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport, CA 92658-8915
RE: CALTY Renovation and Addition--89102
Dear Patty:
Per your request, I am providing verification that the Increase of 4,000 s.f. as depicted on the
revised submission dated, June 14, 1989, does not reflect an increase in employees utilizing the
facility. The purpose of the expansion is to increase the designers work area. Please note that the
project summary on page A-2 of both the original submission dated, April 14, 1989 and the revised
submission reflect ninety-five(95) employees.
Should you have any further questions, please call.
Sincerely,
e
Walter B. Meyer
cc: William Ward
f Robert Lenard
Jim Hewicker
File 301
l
Rossetti Asso es I Architects Planners
1437 Seventh Street,Santa Monica,California 90401
Telephone(213)458-2927
MEMORANDUM
TO: Project File 89102
FROM: Walter B. Meyer 014
DATE: October 23, 1989
SUBJECT: Zone Amendment Strategy Meeting
Meeting Held City of Newport Beach, on October 23, 1989, at 11:00 a.m.
Attendees: Patricia Temple City of Newport Beach
W.William Ward City of Newport Beach
Walter B. Meyer Rossetti Associates
The following represents Rossetti Associates' (RA) understanding of the items discussed. Please
advise within seven days if there are any clarifications.
ACTION INFORMATION
1. All parties reviewed the history, construction schedule, and the
urgency of expediting the approval process. Pat acknowledged
the lack of appropriate attention given to the project and advised
that it will get the attention needed to complete processing
expeditiously. Apparently, much of the delay was due to the
Traffic Consultant. This was the first time Newport Beach has
utilized this consultant.
RA 2. CNB noted that several items were missing from their file and
requested the following from RA:
2.1 The RA memo regarding the reduced parking ratio based
on demonstrated use.
2.2 30 copies of the revised Site Plan for the Zoning
Amendment.
2.3 A memorandum stating that the area Increase of 4,000s.f.
does not represent any increase in the employee count.
3. CNB requested up to date floor plans in order to substantiate that
the use of the space does not constitute the need for more
parking than proposed. Since there is no parking requirement for
"automotive design studios" in the zoning ordinance the project
has been Interpreted to fall under the criteria of an"office building.
Our task has been to obtain an Amendment to the Planned
Community Zone requirement for parking in this type of use.
CNB is now recommending that they evaluate a different
approach. They will review the floor plans, evaluate if the Studios,
storage areas, and shops should be classified as "Warehouse"
space. This may reduce the required parking to that which Is
being proposed and thus eliminate the need for City Council
approval for deviating from the PC parking requirement. In Bill
and Pats opinion, this would eliminate any potentialities of not
getting approval on November 27, 1989. RA will meet with COB
on October 25, 1989, at 9:00 a.m.to evaluate the above.
4. COB advised RA to contact Jim Hewicker of COB on Monday
afternoon on, October 30, 1989, to evaluate if reviewing the
project with the planning Commissioners on an individual basis
prior to the Planning Commission hearing would be advantages
to expediting the approval process.
cc: Attendees
Jim Cooke
Jim Honeycutt
Christopher Trujillo
Bob Gilley
Daniel Alexander
File 108
Q�EWPpRr i
�0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
a P.O. BOX 1768.NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.8915
cq��FonN�P i
PLANNING DEPARTMENT (714) 644-3225
June 14, 1989
Tom Andriolli
Rossetti Associates
1437 7th Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
ub'ect: Traffic Study Proposal for CALTYIToyota Expansion
Dear Mr. Andriolli:
The City of Newport Beach has received a proposal from Kimley-Horn and Associates,
Inc. to prepare a traffic study for the CALTY/Toyota expansion at 2800 Jamboree Road,
Newport Beach. The proposal contains an outline of the scope of work required, ap-
proximate schedule of same, and estimated budget required for the preparation.
The fee requested has been reviewed by the City, and the amount requested for the tasks
required are considered appropriate and warranted. It is, therefore, requested that your
company remit remuneration to your City account and cover the cost generated. The
total compensation requested is enumerated as follows:
Consultant Fees $6,500
City Fees (10%) 650
Total Request: $7,150
Please make the check payable to the City of Newport Beach. Your prompt attention
in this matter is appreciated.
Very truly yours,
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director
B /
Y
PATRICIA L. TEMP E
Principal Planner
PLT\TOYOTA.#57
Attachment
3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach
Rossetti Associaas I Architects Planners
1437 Seventh Street,Santa Monica,California 90401
Telephone(213)458-2927
June 14, 1989
Patricia Lee Temple
Principal Planner
Planning Department
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Blvd., Newport Beach, CA
92658-8915
RE: Toyota CALTY Expansion&Renovation,2800/2810 Jamboree
Road
Dear Patricia,
Please find attached the revised area summaries for the proposed project(Revised drawing A-2
dated 6/14/89,20 copies).As we discussed on the phone,we find it necessary to increase the
square footage totals on the site an additional 4,000 square feet.The area summary describes the
allocation and totals.
If you have any questions or need to review any specifics, please call.Thank you for your attention
to this matter.
Sincerely,
Rossetti Asso tes
homas Andreoii,AIA
Vice President
s:
November 2, 1989
TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ATTN: BILL WARD
FROM: TRAFFIC ENGINEER
SUBJECT: TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE TOYOTA FACILITY EXPANSION
The current plans for the Toyota expansion reflect an increase of
4,000 square feet over the 36,672 expansion analyzed in the
traffic study. I have reviewed the plans and discussed them with
the project architect and am satisfied that the increased area is
in the design studio and not in additional office areas.
Based on this review of the project as currently proposed, the
traffic study does not need to be revised. The increased studio
area should not result in any increase in travel to this site.
Q4,t-ZR A 4-
Richard M. Edmonston
Traffic Engineer
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PLAN REVIEW REQUEST
Date October 26, 1989
_ADVANCE PLANNING .DIVISION
X PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT X PLANS ATTACHED
TRAFFIC ENGINEER (PLEASE RETURN)
_FIRE DEPARTMENT _PLANS ON FILE IN
_PLAN REVIEW DIVISION PLANNING DEPT.
_PARKS & RECREATION
_POLICE DEPARTMENT
_MARINE SAFETY
GRADING
APPLICATION OF: Rossetti Associates Architects and Planners
FOR: Traffic Study No. 57
Request to approve a traffic study so as to permit the additional 40,672± square feet of
additional development for research and development and manufacturing_purposes in
Qnjunction with the existing Toyota design facility located within Aea 1 of the North
Ford Planned Community.
LOCATION: 2800 - 2810 Jamboree Road
REPORT REQUESTED BY: 10-30-89
COMMISSION REVIEW: 11-9-89
COMMENTS: A6XIL5
Si nature
Date:
I�
1
' CALTY/TOYOTA EXPANSION PROJECT
' TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
' Prepared for:
' City of Newport Beach, California
' Prepared by:
Kimley-Horn and Associates
' Anaheim, California
' August 24,1989
COPR 1989 Kimley-Horn
' 9408.00
1
I
1
' TABLE OF CONTENTS
' PROJECT DESCRIPTION I
' TRIP GENERATION 4
' TRIP DISTRIBUTION 6
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 12
' A. Committed Projects
B. Regional Growth
' C. Intersections to be Analyzed
D. 1% Test
E. ICU Test
MITIGATIONS 16
SITE ACCESS 16
SUMMARY 17
' APPENDICES
1. Committed projects
' 2. 1% test sheets
3. ICU calculation sheets
1
1
1
1
' FIGURES
' FIGURE 1: LOCATION MAP 2
FIGURE 2: PROPOSED SITE PLAN 3
' FIGURE 3: PERCENT TRIP DISTRIBUTION 7
FIGURE 4: AM PEAK HOUR TRIP DISTRIBUTION 8
' FIGURE 5: PM PEAK HOUR TRIP DISTRIBUTION 10
' TABLES
' TABLE 1: LAND USE (EXISTING) 1
TABLE 2: LAND USE (PROPOSED). 1
' TABLE 3: GENERATION RATES 4
TABLE 4: TRIP GENERATION (EXISTING CONDITIONS) 5
' TABLE 5: TRIP GENERATION (PROPOSED CONDITIONS) 5
TABLE 6: REGIONAL TRAFFIC ANNUAL GROWTH RATES 12
TABLE 7: 1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS RESULTS 14
' TABLE 8: INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION TEST RESULTS 15
I
1
' PROJECT DESCRIPTION
' Kimley-Horn and Associates has been retained to provide a traffic impact analysis of the
CALTY/Toyota Expansion Project. This study presents an assessment of project traffic impacts and
' possible mitigation measures necessary for the projected traffic of the expanded facility.
The site is located directly east of Jamboree Road, north of Bison Avenue in the City of Newport
Beach, California. Figure I shows the regional location of the site with respect to key transportation
features and various city locations. The project, which is an expansion of the existing site use,forms
' its southern boundary with Mariners' Church property and its western boundary with Jamboree
Road. Current land uses for the property are shown in Table 1. Land uses for the proposed
conditions, which include an additional building, are defined in Table 2 and are illustrated in Figure
2. The project is estimated to be complete by 1991 and is assumed, for this study, to be 100%
occupied at that date.
' TABLE 1: LAND USE (EXISTING)
Existing Use Size (sq.ft.)
' Building A Office 12,295
Research 3.720
' 16,015 Total
2
Building C Office/Studio 16,594 i 1c1'
' Shops 8.586
25,180 Total
TABLE 2: LAND USE (PROPOSED)
' Existing Use Size (soft.)
Building A Office 6,581
(remodel)
' Research & Development 10,059
16,640 Total
' Building B Research & Development 36,047 Total
Building C Office 4,092
' (remodel) , 25°
Manufacture/Research 21.088
25,180 Total y
1 ,1,� t,
act
1
1
3 eP,s 3
1 r°`
sr
OC eq/ST �.ORTy
1 sT
1 UNIVERSITY
1 DR.
PROJECT
1 SITE
3
1 BISON Ay j
IRVINE
1 COSTA MESA
1 FORD ROAD
NEWPORT BEACH
1 e0 J+ s92
4k'�o �G9 ✓o90G
NEWPORT
SPO
CENTER
1 pqC/FjC
COAST
N y%
y/yqY
1
1 LOCATION MAP
CALTY/TOYOTA EXPANSION
1 '4TS FIGURE 1
940800
7/89
iuui�•- In"ra7u`u
1 2
1
1 Zom
z z rnn O
�y
1 \ - X
\\ � W N
-\ ¢ W
N O
OCL
F
1 `
00
J p D w
1 r�-IOL m
6
r/
1 adpa 3380ewvr
1 3
' TRIP GENERATION
' Trip generation for existing and proposed conditions for the site were determined using the ITE
Trip Generation Manual, 4th Edition. Tables 3 & 4 provide a summary of trip generation rates and
resulting trip ends for both the AM and PM peak hour of the adjacent street.
' The City of Newport Beach provided Kimley-Horn with trip generation rates. A comparison of the
' ITE rates and City rates is shown in Table 3 and indicates the ITE equations result in higher trip
generation. The analysis in this study assumes the more conservative ITE rates.
' TABLE 3: GENERATION RATES
' City of ITE
Newport Beach Calculated
' A. Office (General)
AM in 2.0 2.3
AM out .4 .4
' PM in .6 .5
PM out 1.7 2.4
' B. Industrial
AM in .8 1.2
AM out .2 .2
' PM in .4 .2
PM out .7 1.1
' The ITE trip rates are equations using development size as a fixed variable. This approach takes into
account the internalization factor within each use. As per the City of Newport Beach's direction,
' Building A was to be considered office space and Building C was to be considered a light industrial
area for the purpose of calculating trip generation by the existing site. For the proposed expansion,
' light industrial data was applied for the Research & Development areas as well as the
Manufacture/Research area. Due to the characteristics of the land uses,no internal assignments were
' made between the office and industrial uses. No reduction was assumed for either the use of
alternative transportation modes or car pooling.
' After calculating the number of trips generated for both existing and proposed conditions, a
difference was taken to determine the additional trips created. 173 trips will be added daily, 32
' occurring during the AM peak hour and 31 during the PM peak hour. Refer to Tables 4 and 5 for
the various generations.
' 4
1
TABLE 4: TRIP GENERATION (EXISTING CONDITIONS)
Land use Square feet Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
rate tri s rate tries in out rate tri s in out
Office 16,015 21.667 347 2.560 41 36/5 2.658 43 7/36
Light
Industrial 25,180 8.975 226 1.787 45 40/5 1.708 43 5/38
TOTAL 41,195 573 86 76/10 86 12/74
TABLE 5: TRIP GENERATION (PROPOSED CONDITIONS)
Land use Square feet Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
rate tri s rate jEj in out rate 1d s in out
Office 10,673 23.986 256 2.717 29 25/4 2.905 31 5/26
Light
Industrial 67,194 7.292 490 1.324 89 78/11 1.280 86 10/76
TOTAL 77,867 746 118 103/15 117 15/102
5
' TRIP DISTRIBUTION
' The directional distribution of additional travel demand is based upon current and future land use
patterns, the existing roadway network, current travel patterns and the demographic distribution
' of the surrounding region. The City of Newport Beach provided Kimley-Horn with a trip
distribution of the area which had been used in past traffic studies. After reviewing this
information, the distribution was adopted with minor revisions. The percentages shown in Figure
3 were applied to the generated trips to develop a basic travel demand pattern for the AM and PM
peak hour periods. Figures 4 and 5 show the actual generated trips for the AM and PM peak hours,
' respectively.
1
1
1
1
6
1
3 e�,sT 15 % 3
' o
� sT �5%
�aR�slo yo�Ty
oo��
4-0 % 10%40%`�
' 20%
UNIVERSITY
5%
PROJECT 60%
' SITE O�JFF
73 i
1
s0% 10%
1 � m
15% 15%
IRVINE
' COSTA MESA 15%
75% �25%
Q� FORD ROAD 15 BISON AV.
Q�
o�
li, t 15% 'Q NEWPORT BEACH
1 5 % ti s9
1 S9 y
v ✓�9v
D Gay
NEWPORT
�o
III
pgC�F/C 1 5% COAST CENTER 1 5 /O' •-J;
N
y'�y�gr 15%
1 TRIP DISTRIBUTION
�15% CALTY/TOYOTA EXPANSION
' NTS FIGURE 3
940800
8/69
WN1UU�°Ull.%1/11U
7
1
3 eR/ST 3
o�
sr
e�S�o< tio�Ty
' `sT SEE FIGURE 4A
j A UNIVERSITY
' 1 DR.
r
PROJECT
' SITE 0�0�
73
L �
0
' ,eOQ 2,_1 BISON AV-
co
J
IRVINE
COSTA MESA I FORD ROAO +
NEWPORT BEACH
oPo r a/ Sg2`/O
y2
Sg2q �S
P
a NEWPORT N
pgC�F�C ^ CENTER
' J COAST ,
N 4 J hjCy y,
' �qr
AM PEAK HOUR
' TRIP DISTRIBUTION
CALTY/TOYOTA EXPANSION
' NTS FIGURE 4
9408.00
aB!'n�vQ�Ci�G�]
' 8
1
V
J
73
eR�s
6
6 ^N
Aj� >
' o
J
Q7
F
Q
W
1
' N
' AM PEAK HOUR
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
CALTY/TOYOTA EXPANSION
NITS FIGURE 4A
94408.00
G3BGu �GJ��
' 9
1
i
3 eps 3
' rD�
sl
eiislO` NO�Ty
' `ST SEE FIGURE 5A
' UNIVERSITY
DR.
PROJECT
' SITE oJ�
3
N
0
mo�Qo 2_I BISON AV. J
m
3 , z
a� af IRVINE
�11
' COSTA MESA FORD ROAD i
' !h NEWPORT BEACH
S9
t 2
QoPo vD9
Qk' CG�2
,P�00 m S92y y��S
a NEwPORT
CENTER
QC/FjC h
' J COAST
N y%y
PM PEAK HOUR
j 1 v TRIP DISTRIBUTION
{ CALTY/TOYOTA EXPANSION
NTS \i FIGURE 5
98/890
Cfd„ralk-��G��
' 10
3
1 U
0
� N
J
m
' ¢N
W
A
' N
' PM PEAK HOUR
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
' CALTY/TOYOTA EXPANSION
NTS FIGURE 5A
9408.00
' I1
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
' Kimley-Horn evaluated the comparative impact the CALTY/Toyota Expansion would create together
with committed projects approved by the City thus far, and regional growth for the area. With this
information, key intersections were analyzed using the 1% Test, and some were further analyzed
using the ICU Test.
' A. Committed Projects
' Committed Projects are those that are approved to be built or are being built in the area, thus
contributing to future traffic. The City of Newport Beach provided Kimley-Horn with a listing of
' all approved projects. A copy of this data is in Appendix 1. The committed projects and the traffic
they generated were used in analyzing traffic flow in the area.
' B. Regional Growth
' Regional Traffic Annual Growth Rates provided by the City of Newport Beach were used to estimate
the traffic increases at each intersection. Table 6 shows the rates on various streets. Only those rates
' which were used in this report are included. All other streets analyzed have 0% regional growth per
City guidelines. Regional growth rates were applied over 2 years, since the project is expected to
' be completed and occupied in that time frame.
TABLE 6: REGIONAL TRAFFIC ANNUAL GROWTH RATES
' Street Growth
' A. Coast Highway
- East City Limit to MacArthur Boulevard 4%
- MacArthur Boulevard to Jamboree Road 2%
' - Jamboree Road to Newport Boulevard 1%
' B. Jamboree Road
- Coast Highway to MacArthur Boulevard 1%
' C. MacArthur Boulevard
- Coast Highway to Jamboree Road 5%
' - Jamboree Road to North City Limit I%
' 12 '
' C. Intersections to be Analyzed
' Eleven intersections were initially identified by the City to possibly be affected by the proposed
expansion. They are as follows:
' Coast Highway/Jamboree Road
• Santa Barbara/Jamboree Road
• San Joaquin Hills Road/Jamboree Road
' Ford Road/Jamboree Road
• Bison Avenue/Jamboree Road
' University Drive/Jamboree Road
• Bristol Street/Jamboree Road
• Bristol Street North/Jamboree Road
' MacArthur Boulevard/Jamboree Road
• MacArthur Boulevard/Bison Avenue
' MacArthur Boulevard/Ford Road
Each intersection listed above was analyzed in this report.
' D. 1% Test
' In order to determine if the additional Project Traffic would significantly contribute to existing
traffic flow, a 1%Traffic Volume Analysis, as defined by the City, was performed during AM Peak
' Hour and PM Peak Hour for each of the 11 intersections. Existing Peak 2 1/2 Hour volumes and
Approved Projects Peak 2 1/2 Hour volumes were calculated by the City of Newport Beach. Peak
2 1/2 Hour Regional Growth Volume was calculated using the information in Table 6. Project Peak
2 1/2 Hour Volume was calculated by using the Trip Distribution rates for a 1-hour peak and
multiplying only by 2, since most traffic will arrive and depart during the one hour interval.
If the Project Traffic is less than 1% of the Projected Peak, no further analysis is needed. However,
if it is greater, Intersection Capacity Utilization(ICU)Analysis is required. The Analysis Charts can
' be found in Appendix 2. A summary of the results are listed in Table 7.
' 13
li
TABLE 7: 1 % TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS RESULTS
ICU Analysis
' Intersection Peak Hour Needed?
Coast Highway/Jamboree Road AM NO
PM NO
Santa Barbara/Jamboree Road AM NO
PM NO
' San Joaquin Hill Road/Jamboree Road AM NO
PM NO
' Ford Road/Jamboree Road AM NO
PM NO
Bison Avenue/Jamboree Road AM YES
' PM YES
University Drive/Jamboree Road AM NO
' PM NO
Bristol Street/Jamboree Road AM NO
PM NO
' Bristol Street North/Jamboree Road AM NO
PM NO
MacArthur Boulevard/Jamboree Road AM NO
PM NO
' MacArthur Boulevard/Bison Avenue AM NO
PM YES
MacArthur Boulevard/Ford Road AM NO
' PM NO
' E. ICU Test
Those intersections that were shown to be affected by the additional project traffic during the 1%
' test were further analyzed using the Intersection Capacity Utilization method. Three tests were run
and the results are summarized in Table 8. As per the City of Newport Beach's directions, values
' in the table do not include the .05 clearance. ICU sheets can be found in Appendix 3.
14
ill1
TABLE 8: INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION TEST RESULTS*
ICU VALUES ICU VALUES ICU VALUES
INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR EXISTING EXISTING PLUS OTHER " EXISTING PLUS OTHER"
PROJECT
BISON AVENUEIJAMBOREE ROAD AM .62 .75 .75
PM .58 .71 .71
MACARTHUR BLVD/BISON AVENUE PM .65 .80 .80
'ICU VALUES SHOWN DO NOT INCLUDE .05 CLEARANCE
"OTHER = REGIONAL GROWTH PLUS COMMITTED PROJECTS
1 �
' MITIGATIONS
' None of the key intersections studied resulted in an inappropriate Level of Service. The additional
traffic generated from the proposed expansion will not create traffic beyond the standards established
by the Traffic Phasing Ordinance.
' SITE ACCESS
' One main entrance/exit exists on the southeast corner of the lot. The only other access to the site
is through the Mariners' Church parking lot. Together, both seem adequate to accommodate the
increase in trips as a result of the expansion.
L
1
' 16
' SUMMARY
' The proposed expansion of the CALTY/Toyota site and increased trip generation will have virtually
no impact on existing traffic flow on the adjacent street system. It should be noted that the traffic
' calculations are based on a conservative approach using the ITE rates in lieu of the City's.
I
�� ' 17
APPENDIX 1
COMMITTED PROJECTS
1
' 18
1
APPENDIX 1
' COMMITTED PROJECTS
1
1
li
I ' oB�yf9
' TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE
REPORT ON APPROVED PROJECT VOLUMES
' PROJ- NBR ALL PROJECTS ON FILE: APPROVED VOLUME IS WEIGHTED BY:
001 HUGHES Al^CRAFT 81 100% OCCUPANCY
' 002 SUNSETTEU 000% OCCUPANCY
003 FAR WEST SAVINGS AND LOAN 100% OCCUPANCY
004 SUPERSEDED 000% OCCUPANCY
005 AERONUTRONIC FORD OAOX OCCUPANCY
006 BACK BAY OFFICE 100% OCCUPANCY
007 BOYLE ENGINEERING 100% OCCUPANCY
006 CAL CANADIAN BANK 100% OCCUPANCY
009 CIVIC PLAZA 075% OCCUPANCY
010 CORPORATE PLAZA 030% OCCUPANCY
O11 KOLL CENTER NEWPORT 100% OCCUPANCY
' 012 MACARTHUR COURT •032% OCCUPANCY
013 NATIONAL' EDUCATION OFFICE 000% OCCUPANCY
014 NORTH FORD 000% OCCUPANCY
O15 ORCHARD OFFICE 100% OCCUPANCY
' 016 PACIFIC MUTUAL PLAZA 100% OCCUPANCY
017 3701 BIRCH OFFICE 100% OCCUPANCY
016 NEWPORT PLACE 077% OCCUPANCY
' 019 SUNSLTTED OOU% OCCUPANCY
020 BANK OF NEWPORT 100% OCCUPANCY
021 3AYSIDE SQUARE 100% OCCUPANCY
022 SEA ISLAND 037% OCCUPANCY
023 DAYWOOD APARTMENTS 100% OCCUPANCY
024 HARRUR POINT HOMES 025% OCCUPANCY
025 ROGER' S GARDENS 100% OCCUPANCY
' 026 SEAVIEW LUTHERAN PLAZA 1.00% OCCUPANCY
027 RUDY BARON 100% OCCUPANCY '
028 QUAIL BUSINESS CENTER 100% OCCUPANCY
' 029 441 NEWPORT BLVD. 100% OCCUPANCY
030 MARTHA' S VINEYARD 000% OCCUPANCY
031 VALDEZ 000% OCCUPANCY
' 032 COAST L'USINESS CENTER , 005% OCCUPANCY
633 KOLL CENTER NPT NO. 1 TPP 000% OCCUPANCY
034 SEE PROJECTS 340 TO 343 000% OCCUPANCY
035 ROSS MOLLAHD 040% OCCUPANCY
1 03o SUNSETTCD 000% OCCUPANCY
039 HUGHCS AIRCRAFT 42 100% OCCUPANCY
040 SUPERCCOED 100% OCCUPANCY
' 041 FLAGSHIP HOSPITAL 100% OCCUPANCY
042 BIG CANYON 10 024% OCCUPANCY
043 FUN ZONE 1DO% OCCUPANCY
' U'44 MARRIOTT HOTEL 100% OCCUPANCY
U45 ST. ANDREWS CHURCH 100% OCCUPANCY
046 YMCA 000% OCCUPANCY
047 ALLRED CONDOS 100% OCCUPANCY
' 048 MORGAN DEVELOPMENT 100% OCCUPANCY
049 FOUR SEASONS HOTEL 100% OCCUPANCY
050 UNIV ATH CLUB TPP 4 EMKAY 100% OCCUPANCY
' 051 BLOCK. 400 MEDICAL 100% OCCUPANCY
052 SHEP.AT014 EXPANSION 000% OCCUPANCY
' oB:�yBy
' TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE.
REPORT ON APPROVED PROJECT VOLUMES
053 SEE PROJECTS 530 TO 533 0002 OCCUPANCY
054 AMEND NO 1 MCARTHUR COURT 052% OCCUPANCY
056 AMENDMENT NO 2 FORD AERO 100% OCCUPANCY
' 057 CARVER GRANVILLE OFFICE 100% OCCUPANCY
058 CORONA DEL MAR ,HOMES 100% OCCUPANCY
059 BIG• CANYON VILLA APTS. 000% OCCUPANCY
06U 1400 DOVE STREET 000% OCCUPANCY
' 061 1100 QUAIL STREET 000% OCCUPANCY
062 SUPERSEDED 000% OCCUPANCY
063 KOLL CENTER TPP AMEND. 4A DOD% OCCUPANCY
' 064 SUNSETTED 100% OCCUPANCY
065 ROSAN'S DEVELOPMENT 090% OCCUPANCY
066 BLOCK 500 NPT CTR PROJ 100% OCCUPANCY
068 NEWPORT AQUATICS CENTER 045% OCCUPANCY
069 2600 E COAST HWY 000% OCCUPANCY
070 JASMINE PARK 100% OCCUPANCY
071 SUNSETTED 000% OCCUPANCY
072 NEWPORTER INN EXPANSION 100% OCCUPANCY
U73 SUNSETTED DOD% OCCUPANCY
074 SUNSETTED 000% OCCUPANCY
' 075 FASHION IS RENAISSANCE 030% OCCUPANCY
07c SUNSETTED 10U% OCCUPANCY
077 CDM SENIOR PROJECT 100% OCCUPANCY
' C78 POINT DEL MAR 100% OCCUPANCY
079 PACIFIC CLUB 100% OCCUPANCY
080 RIVERSIDE RETAIL BUILDING 001% OCCUPANCY
081 NEWPORT SEACREST APT 100% OCCUPANCY
082 "LOTH ST BED/BREAKFAST INN 001% OCCUPANCY
083 3800 CAMPUS DR( M-STORAGE ) 001% OCCUPANCY
C84 HOAG CANCER CENTER 000% OCCUPANCY
085 EDWARDS NEWPORT CENTER 001% OCCUPANCY
086 SEASIDE APTS ( MESA II ) 100% OCCUPANCY
087 VICTORIA STATION ( OFFICE ) 100% OCCUPANCY
088 3760 CAMPUS DR ( M-STORAGE ) 001% OCCUPANCY
089 NEWPORT IMPORTS 001% OCCUPANCY
U90 NEWPORT PLACE TOWER 001% OCCUPANCY
091 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE 001% OCCUPANCY
' 092 MARINERS' MILE MARINE CTR 040% OCCUPANCY
093 15TH STREET APARTMENTS 100% OCCUPANCY
094 SEASIDE APARTMENTS III 000% OCCUPANCY
095 NPT BAY RETIREMENT INN 000% OCCUPANCY
096 NEWPORT CLASSIC INN 000% OCCUPANCY
097 MARINERS CHURCH EXPANSION 000% OCCUPANCY
096 MCLACHLAN-NEWPORT PL 000% OCCUPANCY
' U99 1501 SUPERIOR MEDICAL 000% OCCUPANCY
100 FASHION ISLAND 42 000% OCCUPANCY
101 NE6PORTER RESORT EXPAND. U00% OCCUPANCY
' 102 TACO FELL ODD% OCCUPANCY
103 NEWPORT LIDO MED CENTER U00% OCCUPANCY
104 VILLA POINT 000% OCCUPANCY
' 105 SHOKRIAN UDO% OCCUPANCY
106 15TH ST APTS 000% OCCUPANCY
107 ROCKWELL EXPANSION 000% OCCUPANCY
' o8•zy89
' TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE
REPORT ON APPROVED PROJECT VOLUMES
108 ANDREW RESTAURANT 000% OCCUPANCY
109 BALBOA / WASHINGTON 000% OCCUPANCY
340 AMENDMENT NO. 1 FORD AERO 100% OCCUPANCY
' 341 AMENDMENT NO. 1 FORD AERO 000% OCCUPANCY
342 AMENDMENT NO. 1 FORD AERO 000% OCCUPANCY
343 AMENDMENT NO. 1 FORD AERO 000% OCCUPANCY
' 530 AMENDMENT NO 1 NORTH FORD 1D0% OCCUPANCY
531 AMENDMENT NO 1 NORTH FORD 100% OCCUPANCY
532 AMENDMENT NO 1 NORTH FORD 100% OCCUPANCY
533 AMENDMENT NO 1 NORTH FORD 000% OCCUPANCY
' 910 NEWPORT DU14ES 000% OCCUPANCY
920 BAYVIEW 000% OCCUPANCY
930 CITY OF IRVINE DEV . 000% OCCUPANCY
1
it ' .
APPENDIX 2
I% TEST SHEETS
' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis
' Intersection COAST HIGHWAY JAMBOREE RD
(Existing Traffic Volumes as-e on Verage Wlnter Spring 19 _9 FAM
' Peak 2� Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1", of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2+ Hour Growth Peak 2h, Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 21, Hour Peak 2M Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
Northbound 1.514
Ltb
2242 9 5 500 27 87 2-87'5690 �3d J� �� `� � `2762 5 2—"l I 31 17
I 3 I I O
' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume
' ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required.
1
DATE:
' PROJECT: I OYOrtA EX 1- Fl (\JS )CN FORM I
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
dntersection COAST HIGHWAY/JAMBOREE RD
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter Spring 19 89) PM
' Peak 2y Hour Approved
ApproT
isting Regional Projects Projected 1" of Projected Project
Direc2y Hour Growth Peak 2+ Hour Peak 2p Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2y Hour
olume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
' Northbound 2� 1 0 3 0
1009 ?
Southbound 4522_ GI � `7 2 5315 S 3 j
' Eastbound 491E a�{ 835 5c&5Z
— — l 9
Westbound 4526 _�J Q`�� y23 5132 51 ' U
' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2}i Hour Traffic Volume
' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
O
Peak 21,,. Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
DATE: 0,9-,N1'97
I ' > PROJECT: j UYOTA EX r /q lvC I U i ( De`+Cc) FOR14 1
i
' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis
intersection JAMBOREE RD/SANTA BARBARA DR
' (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on Average Inter pring 9 _ AM
Peak 21s Hour Approved
' Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 10. of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2> Hour Growth Peak 24 Hour Peak 2> Hour Peak 211 Hour Peak 2> .Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume I Volume
' Northbound 4668_ - 911 5(D7 GI 57 B
southbound 3148 63 ('80 aaq I 3g '
' Eastbound
f
Westbound 480 3q S (Cl 5 I
' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 242 Hour Traffic Volume
' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak .22 Hour Traffic Volume. , Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
1
' DATE:
PROJECT: —roYo-TA N L;? FORM 1
�l �
I
i
' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis
dntersection JAMBOREE RD/SANTA BARBARA DR
' (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on Average Inter pring 9 89 PM
Peak 2� Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2y Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2xi Hour Peak 2k Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume ( Volume
Northbound 2682y�
Southbound 4303 _ Io3z 5� ` I 5 Iy
' Eastbound Y O C) 0 Q i G
westbound 1975gZ�ZZ_
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume
' ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 23-, Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
'(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. '
' DATE: ��/�I
PROJECT: IOTA Fx Pfl N C IU �J r✓E I tQ J FOR14 I
' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis
4ntersection JAMBOREE RD SAN JOA UIN HILLS RD
^�
(Existing Traffic Volumes bas�ice on Average Winter/Spring 19 89)AM
' �• Peak 2� Hour Approved
hpproach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1. of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 2� Hour Peak 2+ Hour Peak 21, Hour Peak 2y Hour
Volume - _ QVolume volume _VolumeC Volume Volume
' Northbound 4195
southbound 4119 110
' Eastbound Q 22 ()U "7 698 O
Westbound 1210—•-� O , ` 0 1 -3 ,10 i O
' ® Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2�2 Hour Traffic Volume
' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
❑
Peak 2,12 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required.
DATE:
PROJECT: I()Yb7A 1 x P/9 (J I( (`,) �
'j Z� FORM I
' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis
intersection JAMBOREE RD/SAN JOAQUIN HILLS RD
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 89 $M
Peak 2y Hour Approved
' Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 2y Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 21; Hour Peak 24 Hour
Volume Volume Volume 6 Volumed( Volume Volume
' Northbound 3521 — —T ,-7
Southbound 59 12,10 -T 10Z 10
' Eastbound 443 _ 0 �� ) 0
Westbound 713 O 1 86 I 9 ! y
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of 'Projected
Peak 2}2 Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required. `
' DATE:
PROJECT: 10Y ()T x FN N
�Z �, FORId I
' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis
' Intersection JAMBOREE RD/EASTBLUFF DR—FORD RD
(Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage Inter pri'ng 19 89 AM
Peak 2y Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected l: of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 2� Hour Peak 2+ Hour Peak 21s Hour Peak 2k Hour
Volume volume QQ V Volume Volume V,olume ! $Volume
' Northbound 5878 V l0 I l�U5 (7 r`"9
' rE
thbound 3442 �a 57 Q �a
stbound Q !1289 stbound 906 0 J I I ! V
' Project Traffic is estimated to be, less than 1% of Projected
® Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume
' ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required.
1
DATE:
' PROJECT: -TC.'i r)T/ i '__/ 'r f"1 r' '- 1r.i iL� ( Dt I tCl FORI4 I
12
' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis
' antersection JAMBOREE RD/EASTBLUFF DR—FORD RD
(Existing Traffic Volumes base on Average Winter/Spring 19 9) PM
' Peak 2y Hour Approved
Ppproach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2)s Hour Peak 21; Hour Peak 2y Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume //Volume Volume
' Northbound 5515
Southbound 4741 __ Q� I I G` oo q ° ( O
' Eastbound 1461 J.:
7 cO O�
Westbound786 _._ . _...... —
' rc� Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Lei Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume
' ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required.
1
' DATE-
PROJECT: 10 07A FAFA ►NsION
' 'mil c FORM I
I
' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis
' dntersection JAMBOREE RD/BISON AV
t
(Existing Traffic Volumes basea on Avertiqu winteilSpring 19 89) AM
' Peak 23S Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1" of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 2� Hour Peak 23s Hour Peak 2)i Hour Peak 2� Hour
Volume CV?olume Volume Volume Volume Volume
Northbound 15 EIS( 5�Z( J v
4641 q p 4 8
Southbound -31
4 010 _ S 7�U Iq u�9
' [lastbound 317 , 3-57 ; 3 0
estbound 513 49 57�--I--=-
F1Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
LJ Peak 2}2 Hour Traffic Volume
' rM Project Traffic is estimated to be ,greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required.
1
1
1
ttom� •{{
DATE: ;A�>'�9
PROJECT:IQyQT/ EXP/JVSc101V ( D,,,lto FOR14I
1
' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection JAMBOREE RD BISON AV
' r (Existing Traffic Volumes base on vera9e inter Spring 19 89) pM
Peak 21s Hour Approved
' Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1" of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 23s Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 21i Hour Peak 2> Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume volume
' Northbound 4255 _ n6G 8Z2- 51 G3 5F� 6
Southbound 4826 7"
' I Eastbound 216 _ ' 1 3 23 1 Z i Q
Westbound 580 -+ 2•' 21 �13 �2
' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2}2 Hour Traffic Volume
' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required.
' DATE•dam:�.��
' C PROJECT: —Mtr�A FOR14 I
' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection JAMBOREE RD/EASTBLUFF DR—UNIVERSITY DR
' (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter Spring 19 89 AM ;
Peak 2� Hour Approved
bpproach Existing Regional Projects Projected M of Projected Project
' Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak Zia Hour Peak 21s Hour Peak 21i Hour Peak 2� Hour
Volume Volume pVolume Volume Volume /Volume
' Northbound 4304 _— 8 ( v-C-4 52L 5 53 I 1p
Southbound 4861 i 8 8 75 5 8-1 5 39
' Eastbound 917 O 1, 60 1 07-7 i 1 1 O
Q i
' Westbound 1858
' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume
❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required.
1
DATE: Q5�2q59
� >A PROJECT: —MY07A Exp6NsIOC\/ ( CO1rOl) FORM I
' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis
.Intersection JAMBOREE RD/EASTBLUFF DR—UNIVERSITY DR
(Existing Traffic Volumes b sed on Average Winter/Spring 19 89)PM
' Peak 21g Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1. of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2 Hour Growth Peak 2� Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2� Hour I Peak 2� Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
' p 7 r, I
Northbound 5043 �0 1 U ` 7 GOZ I GO ! �2,
southbound 6241 (25 12275 71A I�� 70'
Eastbound 747 Q 33 �8LJ
Westbound O �— /G3 G71 I 171611
V
' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 21-2 Hour Traffic Volume
' ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 21-2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required.
' DATE:
PROJECT: -TOYOTA E)C9/9N' 101"J C)L2 FORI4I
' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis
' Intersection JAMBOREE RD/BRISTOL ST
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 89 FAM
Peak 2)s Hour Approved
' Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1" of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2k Hour , Peak 2k Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
Northbound 5669
' Southbound 830 ( 7 780 I 27 I f 2
Eastbound 6335 0 I2E)—I 75g9 7(o I 22
' Westbound
Project Traffic is estimated tb be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume
' ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
' (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required.
II ' DATE: 60'.-���'BI
PROJECT:70YDT/� -Fx pr U C 101V Lr' I'�` J
FORI+I I
' L
' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis
' Intersection JAMBOREE RD/BRISTOL ST
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter Spring 19 89) PM
Peak 2k Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1' of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2� Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 2; Hour Peek 2y Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
Northbound 5191 105 I�0 1 � 2� (CO �3 Southbound 248 7 50 l98 332S 33r-3 �-
Eastbound 4923 0 I I2-1 ` 1TO "2' /Z
Westbound
' n Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
40! Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 211 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required.
DATE:
PROJECT: IoYOT/9 f=xr'F1n� CIOIV
FOR14 I
' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis
' Intersection JAMBOREE RD/BRISTOL ST N
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter Spring 19 89 AM
' Peak 2y Hour Approved ,
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1.", of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2y Hour Growth Peak 2y Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 2k Hour Peak 2� Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
8819 � 7� 928 9g2,9
Northbound
' southbound 808 3 z7 I `
Eastbound
I
I
Westbound r
' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2; Hour Traffic Volume
Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 21� Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required.
DATE: !!O
PROJECT: 'jZ)YUTA ExPFiI�JcICN ( (�P� {'•)
FORM I
' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection JAMBOREE RD/BRISTOL ST NO
(Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage lnter pring 19 89 PM
' Peak 2� Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project I
Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 235 Hour Peak 2$ Hour Peak 2i Hour Peak 2y Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
p
Northbound 6866 � p37 1 1 —1 2 8 145
' Southbound 4154 3 CY12
Eastbound
' Westbound
~�
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume
' ❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
' (I.C.U. ) Analysis is required.
1
1
' DATE:
PROJECT: 1 O Y T/-� =L_ ;�
FORI4 I
t
(� L
!
! 1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection JAMBOREE RD/MACARTHUR BL
1 (Existing Traffic Volumes ase on verage inter Spring 19 8_9) AM
1 Peak 2y Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 10% of Projected Project I
Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 24 Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 2k Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
nn �
1 Northbound 2119 Z17 57G V 1 2-
Southbound 896 8 Q ✓8 1872,
'✓
! Eastbound 3363 27 9 55B
Westbound 1746 0 700
1 ( Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
�! Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume
! Q Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required.
1
1
1
1
1
1 _
DATE:
1 PROJECT: 10YOT/9 Xf•r1 I�/_ f 0Nj ( - IfiU
FORM I
1
1
1 1% Traffic Volume Analysis
dntersection JAMBOREE RD/MACARTHUR BL
1 (Existing Traffic Volumes base on Average Winter pring 19 — PM
r ...
1 Peak 21, Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1: of7P2,ro
ed Pro7Hour
Direction Peak 2�, Hour Growth Peak 2, Hour Peak 2; Hour Peak Peak Volume Volume GV/ollu(me Vollume VolumeVo
1 Northbound ( 2 I :.J"I (0 I I I i
1182_
Southbound 3000 �� Gp2 `3q8 " 1C n
1 Eastbound 1927 3ci_ 8 �� �� I LP3 I
1 Westbound 3337_ �_ —_ 2G—�== — 0
1 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume
1 Project Traffic is estimated, to be greater than 1% of Projected
❑ .Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required.
1 '
1
1 •
1 •
1
1
1
1 DATE:
. PROJECT: 70Y�� I A EX P 0 V• C �� ��'�� ) FORI4 I
' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection MACARTHUR BL/BISON AV
' (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average ter/Spring 19 _ AM
' Peak 2� Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1:. of Projected Project I
Direction Peak g Hour Growth Peak 2� Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 2y Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
' j I
Northbound 7508 3 9eq 555 345 5
Southbound 4883 500 S Z7 S-q 10 jq
Eastbound 465 G '0 53 I 1 5 '
Westbound 0 22 2z 1 O '• O
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2� Hour Traffic Volume
❑ Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 2z Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
1
1
' DATE: el, 6
PROJECT: j O yOTA X I-/i �-J cz 1 cw rll I to
FORM 1
1
' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis
Intersection MACARTHUR BL/BISON AV
' (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Winter/Spring 19 89 PM ;
Peak 2y Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project
Direction Peak 2k Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 2)1 your Peak 2y Hoyr
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
Northbound 4472 _ /r�58 1 2, 5Lq zz 5� 2
L
6 42 G-1 7 l I 7-1 0
94
' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume
' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% 4f Projegted
® Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection CapacitX Utilization
(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required.
1 I
DATE: y� <'i
PROJECT:
G -TO j UTi 1 En F� Ns i o N ( �i� � tU�� FORM I
1 � I
1% Traffic Volume Analysis
dntersection MACARTHUR BL/FORD RD
' (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average winter/spring 19 89)AM
' .Peak 21s Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project
Direction Peak 24 Hour Growth Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Peak 21; Hour Peak 2y Hour
Volume ((-�Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
Northbound 6101 VZ� -1 I t I -7 l� J —7 I n�
Southbound 4346 97 o2t� 2 S
i
Eastbound d 5 2— I
472 U 97
i U
Westbound 2268 0 _O
' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
LICIk Peak 21-, Hour Traffic Volume
' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
❑
Peak 22 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U. ) Analysis is required.
1
1
1
DATE:
PROJECT: YU7/9 EX F>
,� 7 A / FORM I
' 1% Traffic Volume Analysis
' Intersection MACARTHUR BL/FORD RD
(Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average Wlnter pring 19 89) PM ;
' Peak 2y Hour Approved
Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 1'. of Projected Project I
Direction Peak 2� Hour Growth Peak 2k Hour Peak 2� Hour Peak 21s Hour Peak 2y Hour
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume i Volume
Northbound 4384
Southbound ��, 3 ��'�j� 722 3 7/Z6472
ll
' I Eastbound 842 ��l ,
' Westbound 1007 _ 0,1 10 ' U
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected
Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume
' Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected
Peak 2; Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization
(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.
1
1
DATE:G�i��/b9
' PROJECT: -TGYUTH (�-7X P %7 (�_ L DC-It( ��
3 C,-_ _ - FORM I
' APPENDIX 3
ICU CALCULATION SHEETS
I
I '
'1 � I
1 �
i '
�I
i
��yd'I
1
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT: TOYOTA EXPANISON
INTERVAL: AM PEAK HOUR (DELTA ONLY)
' INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD & BISON STREET
- ----_."' -
...............................................................
II II 1 II 1 II 1 1 II 1 IEXISTING I IEX.+OTHERI IEX.+o
' 11MOVEMENT 11EXIST I PROP 11EXISTING IPROPOSED 11EXISTING I OTHER I PROJECT 11EXISTING 1 1+ OTHER I 1+PROJECT I I+PRDJ
11 11LANES ILANES 11CAPACITY ICAPACITY 11 VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME 1.1 V/C I I V/C I I V/C I IV/C-W
11 NL II 1 1 0 II 1600 I 0 II 18 I 0 1 0 II 0.01 I I 0.01 I I 0.01 I I
' II HT II 3 I 0 II 4800 I 0 II 2180 I 490 I 0 II 0.45 I* I 0.56 I* I 0.56 1* 1
II NR II DI DII DI DII DI DI 411 I I I I 1 1
11 SL II 2 1 0 II 3200 I 0 II 95 I 30 i 17 II 0.03 I* I 0.04 I* I 0.04 I*
' II ST II 3 1 0 II 4800 1 0 II 1656 I 389 I 0 II 0.35 I I 0.43 I I 0.43
I I SR II 1 1 D II 1600 I D I I 28 I 1 I D 11 0.02 I I 0.02 I I 0.02 I I
II EL II DI DII DI GII DI DI GII I I I I I I
' II ET II 1 I 0 II 1600 I 0 II 135 i 7 I 0 II 0.08 I* I 0.09 I* I 0.09 I* I
II ER II DI DII DI DII DI GI DII I I I I I I
II WL II 1 1 0 II 1600 I 0 II 93 I 8 I 1 II 0.06 I* i 0.06 I* I 0.06 I*
II WT II 1 1 0 II 1600 I 0 II 43 I 3 1 0 II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0.03
II WR 11 2 1 0 11 3200 I 0 II 101 I 17 I 3 II 0.03 I I 0.04 I I 0.04
.............................."-----_..----".........___......------.._....
--------- NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.48 I 0.60 I 0.60 I 0
' ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAMEIDJAMBISAMI II------_----"'-------"' --
--------- EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.14 1 0.15 1 0.15 1 0
N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND I I__.__""-"'-""-"' -- '
E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0
' L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT
N.S. = NOT'SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.67 I 0.80 I 0.80 I 0
LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II----------------------------- -- ' ----"
' * DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II B I C I C I
OTHER = GROWTH + COMMITTED PROJECTS
1
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT: TOYOTA EXPANSION
INTERVAL: PM PEAK HOUR (DELTA ONLY)
' ---'_---- -INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD 8 BISON STREET
_______________________________________________________
II II 1 II 1 II I I II 1 IEXISTING I IEX.+OTHERI IEX.+O
' 11MOVEMENT 11EXIST I PROP 11EXISTING (PROPOSED 1IEXISTING I OTHER I PROJECT (IEXISTING 1 1+ OTHER I I+PROJECT I 1+PROJ
11 11LANES ILANES ((CAPACITY ICAPACITY 11 VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME 11 V/C 1 I V/C I I V/C I IV/C-W
11 NL 11 1 1 0 11 1600 1 0 11 35 I 1 1 0 11 0.02 I* I 0.02 1* I 0.02 1* 1
II NT II 31 011 48001 011 20191 4591 011 0.42I 1 0.521 I 0.521 I
II NR II of 011 oI 011 OI 01 011 I I 1 I I I
11 SL II 2 1 0 11 3200 I 0 II 117 1 36 I 2 11 0.04 I I 0.05 I I 0.05
tII ST II 3 1 0 11 4800 I 0 11 2150 I 583 I 0 II 0.45 I* 1. 0.57 I* I 0.57 1* 1
II SR II 1 1 0 11 1600 I 0 II 69 I 8 I 0 11 0.04 I I 0.05 I I 0.05
II EL II 01 011 01 011 01 01 011 I I I I I I
11 ET II 1 I 0 II 1600 I 0 11 74 I 2 I 0 11 0.05 I* I 0.05 I* I 0.05 I* 1
II ER II 01 011 01 011 01 01 011 I I I I I I
II WL II 1 I 0 II 1600 I 0 lI 94 I 14 1 5 II 0.06 I* 1 0.07 I* I 0.07 I* I
II WT 11 1 1 0 II 1600 I 0 II 49 I 1 1 0 II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0.03
II WR II 2 I 0 11 3200 I 0 II 62 I 46 I 16 II 0.02 I I , 0.03 I I 0.04 i 1
--------- NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = lI 0.47 1 0.59 1 0.59 1 0
' ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAMEIDJAMBISPMI --------------------------------------------
--------- EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = 11 0.11 I 0.12 1 0.12 I 0
N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND
' E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 1 0.05 1 0
L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT
N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.63 1 0.76 1 0.76 I 0
' LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II"-""----"---- ------------ ------------
* DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II 8 i 0 I 0 I
OTHER = GROWTH + COMMITTED PROJECTS
1
' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
' PROJECT: TOYOTA EXPANSION
INTERVAL: PH PEAK HOUR (DELTA ONLY)
INTERSECTION: MACARTHUR BOULEVARD AND BISON AVENUE
......................................._..............._---------------_....................................................
11 11 1 11 1 11 1 1 11 1 (EXISTING I IEX.+OTHERI IEX.+O
I IMOVEMENT IIEXIST I PROP IIEXISTING (PROPOSED IIEXISTING I OTHER I PROJECT IIEXISTING 1 1+ OTHER I I+PROJECT I 1+PROJ
II IILANES ILANES IICAPACITY ICAPACITY 11 VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME 11 V/C I I V/C i I V/C I IV/C-W
II NL II 1 1 0 11 1600 I 0 11 118 I 27 I 1 11 0.07 I I 0.09 I I 0.09 I I
II NT II 2 I 0 II 3200 i 0 II 1847 I 414 I 0 II 0.58 I* I 0.71 I* I 0.71 I* I
II NR II 01 DII DI DII 01 DI DII I I I I I I
II SL II GI DII DI DII DI GI DII I* I I* I I* I
II ST 11 4 1 0 II 6400 i 0 11 2905 i 587 I 0 11 0.45 ,I I 0.55 I I 0.55I 1
II SR IIN.S- 1 0 11 N.S. 1 0 II 97 I 48 I 0 II N.S. I I N.S. I I N.S. 1 1
' 11 EL 11 2 1 0 11 3200 I 0 II 232 I 52 I 3 II 0.07 I* 1 0.09 1* 1 0.09 1* 1
II ET II DI' DII DI DII DI DI DII I I I I 1 1
II ER IIN.S. 1 0 II H.S. 1 0 11 132 I 31 I 4 11 N.S. I I N.S. I I N.S. I I
' II NL II DI DII DI DII GI DI DII I I I I I I
II WT II DI GII DI DII DI DI DII
II NR II GI DII DI DII DI DI all I I I I I I
. -----•--- NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.58 I 0.71 I 0.71 I 0
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAMEIDMACSISPMI 11-----"--------------------------------------
--------- EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.07 1 0.09 1 0.09 1 0
' N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II-------------------------------------`------
E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0
= LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT
' N.S. o NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.70 I 0.85 I 0.85 I 0
LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II--------------------------------------------
* DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II B I D I D I
OTHER = GROWTH AND COMMITTED PROJECTS
i oE3�yB9