HomeMy WebLinkAbout20131112_CC_Staff ReportSEWPO CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH
C"LIFp 19% City Council Staff Report Agenda Item No. 21
November 12, 2013
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY'COUNCIL
FROM: Community Development Department
Kimberly Brandt, AICP, Director
949-644-3226, kbrandt@newportbeachca.gov
PREPARED BY: Makana Novg', ssf tant Planner
Jo -Villas (PA2012-146)
�03 and 3355 Via Lido
General Plan Amendment No. GP2012-005.
Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment No. LC2013-00.1
Code Amendment No. CA2012-008
Site. Development Review No., SD2013=001
Tract Map No. NT2013-001
(Tentative Tract Map No.17555)
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. ND2013-001
.ABSTRACT:
Theproject consists of the demolition. of .a 3-story commercial building, a single -story
church building (First Church of Christ, Scientist), and a 56-space surface parking„ lot to
accommodate the development of 23 townhouse -style multi -family dwelling units on a
1.2 acre site. The following applications are requested in order to implement the project
as proposed:
1. General Plan Amendment- to change the land use of a portion of the project
site (3303 Via Lido) from PI (Private Institutions, 0.75) to RM (Multi -Unit.
Residential, 20 DU/acre).
2. Coastal Land Use Plan (.CLUP) Amendment- to change the land useof a
portion of the project site (3303'Via Lido) from PI-B (Private Institutions) to RM-D
(Multiple -Unit Residential).
3. Zoning Code Amendment- to change the Zoning designations of the properties
at 3303 Via Lido from PI (Private Institutions.) and 3355 Via Lido from RM
(Multiple -Unit Residential, 2178.) and establish a Planned Community
Development Plan (PC) Zoning 'District over the entire project site. In order to
I
Lido. Villas
November 12, 2013
Page 2
establish the proposed planned community development plan, a waiver of the
minimum site area of 10 acres of developed land is requested.
4. Site Development Review- to allow the construction of 23 'townhouse -style
multi -family dwelling units.
5. Tentative Tract Map- to combine six underlying parcels on two existing
properties and establish. a .23-uni:t residential condominium tract on a 1.2 acre
site.
6. Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND)- to evaluate potential environmental
impacts of the proposed project relative to the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA).
RECOMMENDATION:
1) Conduct a public hearing; and
2013-76
2) Adopt Resolution No. (Attachment No.
Negative Declaration No. ND2013-001
Mitigation Monitoring, and Reporting
Environmental Quality Act;
CC 1) adopting the Lido Villas Mitigated
(SCH No.. 201,3071050) including the
Program pursuant to the California
3) Adopt Resolution No 2013-77(Attachment No. CC 2) approving General Plan
Amendment No. GP2012-005 and Local Coastal Plan Amendment No. LC2013-001,
2013-23
4) Introduce City Council Ordinance. No. (Attachment No. CC 3) and pass on to
second reading ,on November 26, 2013, approving Code Amendment No. CA2012-
008 establishing the Lido Villas Planned. Community; and
2013-78
5) Adopt Resolution No. (Attachment No. CC 4) -approving. -Site Development
Review No. SD 2013=001 and Tentative Tract Map No. NT201'3-001(Tentative Tract
Map No.17555).
2
Lido Villas
November 12, 2013
Page 3
VICINITY MAP
T.
`
t
3355 Via
p
Al G 5+ ..k
S \r=
3303Via Lido
��� J�,m «'• r
1JgA h1ALAGA
o 475 �
Q
32NDST
LOCATION
GENERAL PLAN I
ZONING
CURRENT USE
RM (Multi -Unit
RM (Mufti -Unit
ON -SITE
Residential, 20 DU) and
Residential, 2178) and P1
General Office/Retail and Church
PI (Private Institutions,
(Private Institutions, 0.75
0,75 FAR)
FAR
MU-V (Mixed -Use
MU-V (Mixed -Use
Vertical) and MU-W2
Vertical) and MU-W2
General Office, Retail, and
NORTH
(Mixed -Use Water
(Mixed -Use Water
Mixed -Use
Related
Related
PI (Private Institutions)
PI (Private Institutions)
SOUTH
and CG (General
and CG (General
Church and General Office
Commercial)
Commercial
CG (General
CG (General
Retail Shopping Center and
pp 9
EAST
Commercial) and PF
Commercial) and PF
Former City Hall Site
Public Facilities
Public Facilities)
MU-W2 (Mixed -Use
MU-W2 (Mixed -Use
General Office and Multiple Unit
WEST
Water Related and RM
Water Related and RM
Residential Dwellings
(Multiple -Unit Residential
(Multiple -Unit Residential
3
Lido Villas
November 12, 2013
Page 4
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
There is no budget impact related to this item.
DISCUSSION:
Project Setting
The subject properties are located within the Lido Village neighborhood and are
generally bounded by Via Lido, Via Oporto and Via Malaga. There are two
developments consisting of six legal parcels on the project site, which would combine to
create a single building site of 52,099 square feet (1.2 acres).
The southern property at 3303 Via Lido is 17,236 square feet (0.4 acres) in area and is
currently developed with the religious institution, First Church of Christ, Scientist,
originally constructed in 1947 with additions in 1958 and 1966. The church consists of
8,961 square feet of building area for the primary church facility and an ancillary
Christian Science Reading Room. The property is currently designated by the Land Use
Element of the General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan, and the Zoning Code for Private
Institutions (PI), consistent with the existing use on the property.
The northern property at 3355 Via Lido is 32,469 square feet (0.8 acres in area). The
property is developed with a 56-space surface parking lot and an office building
originally constructed as a mixed -use project in 1957. The property is currently
designated by the Land Use Element of the General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan, and
the Zoning Code for Multiple -Unit Residential (RM) with a density of 20 dwelling units
per acre. The current commercial uses are nonconforming and are subject to abatement
by February 1, 2022.
The property that is directly to the north is developed with an office and retail building, at
the corner of Via Lido and Via Oporto. To the northeast, 3388 Via Lido, is a mixed -use
development consisting of office and two residential units. Properties to the east across
Via Lido are developed with multiple -family residential dwellings and an office building.
The properties to the south, across Via Malaga, are developed with the Saint James
Anglican Church, an office building, and the City of Newport Beach Fire Station. A new
boutique hotel is in the planning stages for the former City Hall site located to the
southwest of the project site at 3300 Newport Boulevard. To the west, across Via
Oporto, is a retail shopping center, Via Lido Plaza, that has recently undergone tenant
improvements for West Marine, a marine -related retail use.
Proiect Descriotion
The proposed project necessitates several land use amendments to create a single unified
development site that accommodates the proposed multi -family residential development.
The requested change of the General Plan designation for 3303 Via Lido is from Private
4
Lido Villas
November 12, 2013
Page 5
Institutions (PI, 0.75 FAR) to Multiple -Unit Residential (RM, 20 du/ac) to accommodate the
proposed residential development. The approval of the General Plan Amendment would
not necessitate a vote of the electorate per Section 423 of the City Charter.
The subject property is also located within the coastal zone and the requested change to
the Coastal Land Use category is consistent with the recommended General Plan
Amendment for 3303 Via Lido from Private Institutions (PI-B) to Multiple -Unit Residential
(RM-D). The CLUP amendment and other associated discretionary approvals would not
become effective until the amendment to the Coastal Land Use Plan is approved by the
Coastal Commission.
The proposed project also requires a corresponding amendment to the Zoning District to
the PC -Planned Community Zoning District. The application includes the adoption of the
Lido Villas Planned Community that will provide land use and development standards for
the construction and operation of the 23-unit condominium development. A waiver of the
10-acre (developed) minimum site area is requested as part of the establishment of the
PC Zoning District. The resulting density under the PC Zoning District would be equivalent
to the density allowed under the RM 2178 designation and would allow for a maximum of
23 dwelling units on -site with a density of 20 dwelling units per acre. The Lido Villas
Planned Community would establish project specific height and setbacks for the
development that differ from the current RM development standards.
In addition to the proposed land use amendments, a site development review and tentative
tract map are required to authorize the development project. All six underlying legal lots
and a vacated alley that transect the site are owned by the project applicant, Dart
Development Group. The applicant is proposing to consolidate these underlying lots into
one 52,099-square-foot (1.2 acre) parcel and redevelop the site as a multi -family
residential development with 23 condominium units (Project Plans-- Attachment No. CC
13). The tract map will also establish each unit for individual sale, new emergency
access easements, and utility easements to accommodate the location of new
structures as part of the development.
The building configuration is designed with five blocks of attached, townhouse -style
units. Three of these blocks consist of 11 units facing Via Lido, one block consisting of
six units facing Via Malaga, and one block of six units facing Via Oporto. Each unit
provides two or three bedrooms and is similar in design with three levels of living area
above grade with a roof deck above.
Vehicular access to the project site would be provided access from Via Oporto at the
northwest portion of the project site and Via Malaga from the southeast portion. Each
unit includes an attached 2-car garage and the project will include 12 code required
guest parking spaces in a surface lot. Each of the garages accommodate two vehicles
and a trash enclosure.
5
Lido Villas
November 12, 2013
Page 6
Each unit is topped with a flat roof deck at an overall height of 35 feet 3 inches to the
top of the roof deck rall. In addition, 39-foot high architectural projections are proposed
that accommodate an enclosed stairway access to the third floor level and vaulted
ceiling. The units range in size between 2,453 square feet to 3,168 square feet of gross
floor area. Three units have been designed to be accessible for persons with
disabilities.
The proposed architecture consists of a modern coastal style with exterior materials
consisting of wood siding, stainless steel panels, and glass railings. Access to each unit
is also provided along the adjacent public street frontage with enhanced paving, a low
stone planter wall, 38-inch-high stained privacy fence, and a covered entry. Common
open space areas consisting of open patio areas and landscaping are provided on -site
at street corners adjacent to Via Malaga and between the building blocks adjacent to
Via Lido.
A full discussion of the project components, including analysis of applicable General
Plan and Coastal Land Use Plan policies, Section 423 thresholds (Attachment No. CC
10), Planned Community Development Standards (Exhibit "B" to Attachment No. CC 3),
project architecture and consistency with the Lido Villas Design Guidelines, and the
required project findings are provided in the Planning Commission staff reports dated
August 22, 2013, and September 5, 2013 (Attachment Nos. CC 5 and 6).
Environmental Review
Prior to taking action on the proposed project, the City Council must first review, consider,
and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) (Exhibit "A" of the Draft Resolution,
Attachment CC 1). The MND is comprised of the Notice of Intent (NOI), Initial Study (IS),
Environmental Analysis, and Appendices.
Based upon the analysis of the Initial Study, the environmental categories within which the
project would have either no impact or less than significant impact were: Aesthetics,
Agricultural/Forest Resources, Biological Resources, Geology/Soils, Greenhouse Gas
Emissions, Hydrology/Water Quality, Land Use/Planning, Mineral Resources, Noise,
Population/Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Transportation/Traffic, and
Utilities/Service Systems.
Based upon the analysis of the Initial Study, the environmental categories within which the
project would have potentially significant impacts were: Air Quality, Cultural Resources,
and Hazards/Hazardous Materials. Specific mitigation measures have been included to
reduce the potentially significant adverse effects to a less than significant level. A
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been prepared for
consideration attached as Exhibit "B" of the draft resolution (Attachment No. CC 1).
On the basis of the analysis provided in the MND, City staff has concluded that the
project would not have a significant impact on the environment. The MND reflects the
independent judgment of the City and recognizes project design features, standard
Lido Villas
November 12, 2013
Page 7
construction and engineering practices, and review and reevaluation of future projects
as the means to avoid potential impacts. The project site does not include any sites on
an Environmental Protection Agency hazardous waste site list pursuant to Government
Code Section 65962.5.
The MND was completed and circulated for a mandatory 30-day public -review period that
began on July 12, 2013, and concluded on August 13, 2013. The public comment period
was extended through August 13, 2013 to allow for comments received through OPR (the
Office of Planning and Research), which began the review period on July 15, 2013.
Several comment letters were received from advising agencies, which are attached as
Attachment CC 11 for consideration.
Planning Commission Review
The Planning Commission held a public meeting on August 22, 2013 and a public
hearing on September 5, 2013.
During the public hearing, the following issues were raised and addressed: 1) site
design, 2) the proposed height limit, 3) on -site parking, 4) project architecture and
compatibility with the Lido Village Design Guidelines, 5) the request for a waiver of the
minimum 10-acre requirement to establish a Planned Community Zoning District, 6)
permitted uses under the Lido Villas Planned Community.
1) Site Design
The Planning Commission noted that the site design might present opportunities for
additional landscape areas and that the ground floor entry areas might be better served
if the project had additional height to free up space on the ground plane. The
Commission also noted some concern with maintenance of these common landscape
areas and asked that these areas be included in the maintenance guidelines for the
covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs).
2) Proposed Height Limit
Several commissioners suggested increasing the height limit to afford the first floor level
improvements such as a raised porch and first floor level with additional landscaping at
the front of each dwelling unit. Staff clarified that the MND had considered the specific
heights proposed by the project applicant and the revised document would need to be
re -circulated for a 30-day public comment period in order to allow additional height for
the project. Staff also reminded the Commission that the Coastal Commission had
commented on the project application and may see the project as too tall. Staff believed
that the project was generally consistent with the Shoreline Height Limitation In that the
proposed PC development standards establish a maximum height consistent with the
Shoreline Height Limitation and only specific architectural projections would exceed this
7
Lido Villas
November 12, 2013
Page 8
height limit, consistent with the application of height limits established by the Zoning
Code.
3) Parking
Several Commissioners observed that the project is under -parked, despite the fact that
code required parking is provided on -site. Staff noted that they had worked extensively
with the applicant to achieve proper circulation and access to provide the minimum
number of required guest parking spaces on -site. Provisions were added to Condition
No. 86 regarding the CC&R's, requiring "That the garage parking spaces shall be used
only for parking of operational vehicles and not for storage,"
4) Architecture and Design Guidelines
The Planning Commission discussed the project's architecture and consistency with the
Lido Villas Design Guidelines. Several Commissioners expressed concern with the
project architecture, noting that the presence of balconies along the facades lent the
project toward a "motel" look. The Planning Commission noted that it is not the
Commission's position to impose what it thinks the project architecture should be,
provided it is consistent with the Lido Village Design Guidelines. The Commission
suggested that the applicant reconsider the building facades to develop a softer look
prior to the City Council meeting. Provisions were added to Condition No. 86 regarding
the covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&R's), requiring, "The architecture and
exterior building materials of the dwelling units shall be maintained in a quality, color,
and type so the appearance is consistent with the original project as developed."
5) Waiver of 10-Acre Minimum for Planned Community
Staff provided clarification to the public comments with regard to the requested waiver
of the ten acre minimum to establish a Planned Community and identified that the
waiver takes into account the broader context of Lido Village as a whole. The proposed
project is located within a larger urban development pattern where adjusted
development standards are appropriate for the urban site to ensure the project site
remains compatible with the greater neighborhood.
6) Allowed Uses
Further discussion ensured to clarify the list of permitted and prohibited uses proposed
under the draft Planned Community (PC) Text. Staff identified that the Zoning Code
provides language that allows the Community Development Director to interpret
permitted and prohibited uses where the PC provisions are silent. The Commission
suggested limiting the listed permitted uses to condominiums, recreation facilities
ancillary to residential uses, and accessory structures under the Lido Villas Planned
Community Text.
U
Lido Villas
November 12, 2013
Page 9
The Planning Commission determined the proposed amendments and project were
acceptable and voted unanimously to recommend approval to the City Council. The
Planning Commission staff report, resolution, and draft minutes from the Planning
Commission meeting have been attached for reference as Attachment Nos. CC 5
through 9.
Project Updates
The following discussion provides updates of the project following the Planning
Commission Meetings.
1) S1318 Tribal Consultation Guidelines
Pursuant to Section 65352.3 of the California Government Code, a local government is
required to contact the appropriate tribes identified by the Native American Heritage
Commission (NAHC) each time it considers a proposal to adopt or amend the General
Plan. If requested by any tribe, the local government must consult for the purpose of
preserving or mitigating impacts to cultural resources. The City received comments from
the NAHC indicating that 14 tribal contacts should be provided notice regarding the
proposed amendment. The tribal contacts were provided notice on January 30, 2013
and the remaining contacts identified by the NAHC were provided notice on August 6,
2013. Section 65352.3 of the California Government Code requires 90 days prior to
Council action to allow tribe contacts to respond to the request to consult unless the
tribe contacts mutually agree to a shorter time period. Since the most recent set of
notices were sent out on August 6, 2013, the 90-day consultation period ended
November 4, 2013.
The City was contacted by Ms. Joyce Perry, Representing Tribal Chairperson for the
Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation, who expressed an interest in
requiring an archeological monitor during construction operations at the project site. The
Lido Village area has previously been subject to significant alteration. However,
mitigation measures have been required by the MND as suggested by Ms. Perry
requiring an archaeological and paleontological monitor to be on -site to monitor the
construction process.
The City was also contacted by Mr. Robert Dorame, Tribal Chair for the Gabrielino
Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council, who expressed an interest in the project
and inquired if any archaeological surveys had been conducted within a mile of the
property, whether the Information Center at Cal State Fullerton had been contacted to
determine if any archaeological sites had been identified, and whether an
archaeological firm had been engaged to survey the subject property. The City
responded to this correspondence and identified that archaeological surveys have not
been conducted in the area due to the general understanding that the site was
previously developed and had been subject to significant alteration. From this point
forward, the City did not receive any further correspondence from Mr. Dorame.
9
Lido Villas
November 12, 2013
Page 10
Finally, the City was contacted by Mr. Johntommy Rosas, representing the Tongva
Ancestral Territorial Tribal Nation, who suggested that the City should follow the Office
of Planning and Research Guidelines as specified by SB18 Tribal Consultation
Guidelines. After requesting more specific comments regarding the proposed project or
process, the City did not receive any further correspondence from Mr. Rosas.
In conclusion, the SB18 tribal consultation has been completed and the project can
proceed.
2) Housing In -Lieu Fee
Housing in -lieu fees will not be assessed as a condition of approval for the proposed
project due to the approved Housing Element update and pending revocation of the
housing in -lieu fee ordinance. Accordingly, this condition of approval has been removed
from the draft conditions of approval for the Tentative Tract Map (Attachment No. CC 4).
3) Project Plans
Site landscaping and front entry improvements have been made to the site plan and
landscape plans to add additional landscaped areas reflecting the comments and
direction made by the Planning Commission at the public hearing held on September 5.
2013. Additionally, a water feature located at the corner of Via Lido and Via Malaga was
removed due to concerns that the feature may pose an ongoing maintenance issue for
the homeowner's association.
Summary
The applicant has requested the amendments to provide a unified development site with
consistent land use designations to accommodate the proposed multiple -unit residential
development. The proposed multiple -unit residential land use is compatible with
surrounding land uses and the goals and land use policies identified for this block within
the Lido Village community. The Planning Commission found the proposed project is
consistent with the RM land use designation and that the use would not conflict with the
General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan, Coastal Act, and proposed Lido Villas Planned
Community Text. The approval of the General Plan Amendment for 3303 Via Lido to the
RM, 20 du/acre designation would not necessitate a vote of the electorate per Section
423 of the City Charter (Measure S). The requested site development review and tract
map to authorize the project meets applicable standards and the required findings
provided in the Subdivision and Zoning Codes can be supported (Attachment No. CC
4). The proposed development is also consistent with the Lido Villas Design Guidelines.
-Fhe site design provides required parking on -site with sufficient and safe vehicle
access. The Planning Commission and staff do not foresee any adverse environmental
impacts with redevelopment of the site and the project will comply with the mitigation
10