Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC2020-035 - UPHOLDING THE DECISION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR APPROVING COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. CD2020-118 FOR A SMALL CELL FACILITY LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGH05-14-19 RESOLUTION NO. PC2020-035 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE DECISION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR APPROVING COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. CD2020-118 FOR A SMALL CELL FACILITY LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT- OF-WAY ON CITY STREETLIGHT NUMBER SLC4653, ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BAYSIDE DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 900 FEET NORTH OF EL PASEO DRIVE (PA2019-115) THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FACTS. 1. An application was filed by New Cingular Wireless, LLC (“Applicant”), with respect to City of Newport Beach (“City”) Streetlight Number 4653 (“SLC4653”), located within the public right-of-way, on the north side of Bayside Drive approximately 900 feet northwest of El Paseo Drive, requesting approval of a coastal development permit (“CDP”). 2. The Applicant proposes the installation of a small cell wireless facility on a City-owned streetlight pole. Project implementation will be fully contained within the public right-of- way on Bayside Drive and includes: removal and replacement of an existing City streetlight; installation of a small cell wireless facility that consists of four (4) remote radio units, a raycap disconnect, and an omni-directional antenna within a 12-inch diameter equipment shroud, with the equipment being fixed to the top of the replaced streetlight pole for a maximum height of 27 feet, 5 inches; and establishment of new below-grade support equipment adjacent to the streetlight (“Project”). . 3. Since SLC4653 is located within the public right-of-way, the proposal is regulated by Council Policy L-23 (Siting of Wireless Telecommunications Equipment on City-Owned Property), as well as Chapter 20.49 (Wireless Telecommunication Facilities) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code (“NBMC”). Pursuant to Section 20.49.060 (Permit Review Procedures) of the NBMC, a minor use permit is required for this type of installation. 4. The City’s regulatory review of wireless telecom siting is limited by three federal laws: (1) the Communications Act of 1934; (2) Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Telecommunications Act); and (3) the Middle-Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (Spectrum Act), which aim to facilitate wireless infrastructure development and restrict certain aspects of local authority in review and permitting of wireless telecommunications facilities; 5. On January 14, 2019, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) Declaratory Ruling and Order FCC 18-133 (“Order”), modified in part by City of Portland v. United States, No. 18-72689 (9th Cir. 2020), removed barriers to wireless infrastructure deployment and established accelerated timelines for processing wireless applications at the local level. This Order also limited the City’s rights as a property owner, restricting Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2020-035 Page 2 of 11 02-03-2020 the type and amount of fees that can be collected for private use of public property such that the City’s review and approval is primarily limited to reasonable aesthetic requirements, environmental concerns, and land use compatibility. 6. A public hearing was held on April 16, 2020, in the Community Room located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and purpose of the hearing was given in accordance with California Government Code Section 54950 et seq. (“Ralph M. Brown Act”), as well as Chapter 20.62 (Public Hearings) of the NBMC. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by the Zoning Administrator at this public hearing. 7. The Zoning Administrator adopted Resolution No. ZA2020-031 approving Minor Use Permit No. UP2019-034 for this Project. Although a call for review was attempted by the Planning Commission, said call for review occurred after the designated appeal period had expired in accordance with Section 20.64.030 (Filing and Processing of Appeals and Calls for Review) of the NBMC therefore rendering UP2019-034 effective. 8. The Project is located within the Coastal Zone. Subsection 21.49.020(B) (Permit and Agreement Required) of the NBMC requires a CDP for a wireless telecommunication facility unless said facility is exempted by Subsection 21.49.020(C) (Exempt Facilities). In this case, the Project does not meet any of the prescribed exemptions; therefore, a CDP is required. Upon finding that a CDP is required, the Applicant revised the request to include said permit. 9. A telephonic public hearing was held on August 27, 2020 in the City Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, due to the Declaration of a State Emergency and Proclamation of Local Emergency related to COVID-19 A notice of time, place and purpose of the hearing was given in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act and Chapter 21.62 (Public Hearings) of the NBMC. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the Zoning Administrator at this public hearing. 10. The Zoning Administrator adopted Resolution No. ZA2020-058 approving CDP No. CD2020-118. 11. On September 9, 2020, Mr. Jim Mosher filed an appeal of the Zoning Administrator’s decision citing an inadequate consideration of alternative locations. 12. A de novo telephonic public hearing was held online on October 22, 2020, in the Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California, observing restrictions due to the Declaration of a State Emergency and Proclamation of Local Emergency related to COVID-19. A notice of time, place and purpose of the public hearing was given in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, Chapter 20.62 and Chapter 21.62 of the NBMC. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the Planning Commissioner at this hearing. Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2020-035 Page 3 of 11 02-03-2020 SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DETERMINATION. 1. The Project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15302 and 15303 under Class 2 (Replacement or Reconstruction) and Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), respectively, of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, because it has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment. Class 2 consists of replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced. Class 3 consists of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures; installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures; and the conversion of existing small structures from one use to another where only minor modifications are made in the exterior of the structure. 2. In this case, the Project includes the removal and replacement of an existing City streetlight pole to install a small cell wireless facility, including below-grade accessory equipment. 3. The exceptions to the Class 3 categorical exemption under Section 15300.2 are not applicable. The project location does not impact an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern, does not result in cumulative impacts, does not have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances, does not damage scenic resources within a state scenic highway, is not a hazardous waste site, and is not identified as a historical resource. SECTION 3. REQUIRED FINDINGS. In accordance with Subsection 21.52.015(F) (Coastal Development Permits, Findings and Decision) of the NBMC, the following findings and facts in support of such findings are set forth: Finding: A. Conforms to all applicable sections of the certified Local Coastal Program. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The Project is considered a Class 3 (Public Right-of-Way) installation. Section 21.49.040 (Telecom Facility Preferences and Prohibited Locations) of the NBMC lists Class 3 installations as third on the installation preference list. It is not proposed at a location that is prohibited by NBMC Subsection 21.49.040(B) (Prohibited Locations). 2. After a thorough review of the area, the Applicant concluded that a more preferred location as defined by NBMC Subsection 21.49.040(A) (Preferred Locations), such as a collocation or a Class 1 or 2 facility, would not be technically feasible from an RF or construction perspective. The analysis explained that small cell facilities are low powered and must be located at the precise location selected to serve the network traffic Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2020-035 Page 4 of 11 02-03-2020 demands of the specific limited area. Further, this type of service cannot be accomplished with a traditional macro collocation or building mounted site in the area. 3. Four nearby streetlights were identified and investigated by the Applicant as possible alternate locations for the small cell facility however none of the sites were found to be suitable alternatives due to factors such as either the surrounding topography or a lack of available screening. 4. While a Class 1 (Stealth/Screened) wireless facility (PA2018-151) was approved approximately 800 feet southeast on the Bahia Corinthian Yacht Club building at 1601 Bayside Drive, that project was ultimately never constructed due to technical challenges that rendered its construction infeasible. 5. The Project site abuts a residentially zoned property; however, the physical residence at that property is set back from the property line approximately 115 feet and is separated from the right of way by a steep slope. The slope is densely landscaped with a variety of plants. The vegetation provides visual interest and distraction from the streetlight. 6. Given the significant grade differential between the adjacent single-family residence and the street, the general visibility of the Project is lessened for the existing residential development. Across Bayside Drive, approximately 50 feet west, there are residences zoned Multi-Unit Residential (“RM”) with grades that are approximately five feet below the grade of the proposed facility. 7. Bayside Drive is a well-traveled, two-lane, street. It also features bike lanes in both directions and street parking on the northbound side. It is developed with typical street infrastructure including streetlights, utility cabinets, and storm drains. The Project is visually compatible with the existing streetscape environment. 8. The location of the existing streetlight is along a straight portion of road and in line with the surrounding streetscape and existing light poles. The replacement streetlight pole will be installed in the same location as the existing streetlight pole and it will not visually protrude. 9. While Bayside Drive is considered the first public road paralleling the sea, the Project is located on the landward side of the road and not between the first public road and the sea. Pursuant to Subsection 21.49.050(B) of the NBMC, the Project has been reviewed to ensure compliance with Section 21.30.100 (Scenic and Visual Quality Protection). The subject location is located within the first public roadway paralleling the sea and the sea but is not between the first public roadway paralleling the sea and the sea. It further is not proposed on a coastal bluff or canyon, not adjacent to or within the viewshed of a public viewpoint, coastal view road, public park or beach, or public accessway, as identified on the Coastal Land Use Plan Map 4-3 (Coastal Views), and does not contain significant natural landforms or vegetation. 10. The Project involves the removal and replacement of an existing City streetlight in the same location with the same luminaire height. It has been designed to blend with its Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2020-035 Page 5 of 11 02-03-2020 surroundings and, while it will be visible, the replacement streetlight is consistent with the size, shape, style, and design of the existing pole. No above-ground mounted equipment is proposed, and the support equipment is proposed to be placed in underground handholes. All transmission equipment, including remote radio units and the raycap disconnect switch, are fully concealed within a screening shroud. There will be no negative impacts on coastal views or coastal resources with the Project’s implementation. 11. The proposed replacement streetlight and antenna structure will comply with the maximum allowable height limit of 35 feet from existing finished grade. Finding: B. Conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act if the project is located between the nearest public road and the sea or shoreline of any body of water located within the coastal zone. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. As discussed in Fact in Support of Finding A.9, SLC4653 is not located between the nearest public road paralleling the sea or shoreline. There is no pedestrian right-of-way or access on the north side of Bayside Drive and, as such, the Project will not affect the public’s ability to gain access to, use, and/or view the coast and nearby recreational facilities. 2. The Project will allow the installation of a small cell facility that complies with all applicable Local Coastal Program (“LCP”) development standards and maintains development attributes consistent with the existing and anticipated future surrounding neighborhood pattern of development. Therefore, the Project does not have the potential to degrade public views within the Coastal Zone. SECTION 4. DECISION. Now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The City’s Planning Commission hereby finds this Project is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Sections 15302 and 15303 under Class 2 (Replacement or Reconstruction) and Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), respectively, of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, because it has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment. The exceptions to the Class 3 exemption do not apply. 2. The City’s Planning Commission hereby approves CDP No. CD2020-118, subject to the conditions set forth in “Exhibit A,” which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference, in addition to the minor use permit already granted via Use Permit No. UP2019-034. Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2020 -035 Page 6 of 11 3. This action shall become final and effective ten (10) working days following the date this Resolution was adopted unless within such time an appeal or call for review is filed with the Office of the City Clerk in accordance with Title 21 (Local Coastal Program Implementation Plan) of the NBMC . Final action taken by the City may be appealed to the Coastal Commission in compliance with Section 21 .64.035 (Appeals to the Coastal Commission) of the NBMC, California Code of Regulations Title 14 , Division 5.5 , Chapter 5, Subchapter 2 , Sections 13111 through 13120 , and Section 30603 of the California Public Resources Code . PASSED , APPROVED , AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER , 2020 . AYES : Ellmore , Klaustermeier, Kleiman , Koetting, Lowrey , Rosene, and Weigand NOES: ABSTAIN: BY : ----------- Lauren Kleiman , Secretary 02 -03-2 020 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2020-035 Page 7 of 11 02-03-2020 EXHIBIT “A” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Division 1. The development shall be in substantial conformance with the plans, including elevation exhibits and visual simulations, stamped and dated with the date of this approval (except as modified by applicable conditions of approval). 2. The Project is subject to all applicable City ordinances, policies, and standards, unless specifically waived or modified by the conditions of approval. 3. The Applicant shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws. Material violation of any of those laws in connection with the use may be cause for revocation of this approval. 4. The Project approved by this permit shall comply with all applicable Federal and State rules, regulations, and standards. 5. The replacement pole shall be reconstructed in the exact location of the existing streetlight pole. 6. The reconstructed streetlight pole design shall be consistent with the size (including diameter), shape, style, and design of the existing streetlight pole to the greatest extent feasible, including the attached light arm and luminaire. All mounted equipment shall be painted to match the color and style of the replacement streetlight pole. 7. All accessory support equipment of this Project shall be installed underground. 8. All electrical and antenna wiring shall be fully encased within the reconstructed streetlight pole. 9. The Project approved by the use permit shall comply with any easements, covenants, conditions, or restrictions on the underlying City-trust property upon which the Project is located. 10. Anything not specifically approved by this permit is not permitted and must be addressed in a separate and subsequent review. 11. Prior to building permit final, a Height Certification Inspection shall be required prior to final of building permits. The small cell facility and base streetlight pole approved by this permit shall not exceed a total of 27 feet, 5 inches in height from existing grade. The top of the new luminaire shall not exceed a total of 21 feet, 1 inch in height from existing grade and shall match the height and shape of the existing luminaire. 12. Prior to building permit issuance, all contractors and subcontractors shall have a valid City of Newport Beach business license. Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2020-035 Page 8 of 11 02-03-2020 13. The Applicant shall continually maintain the wireless telecom facility so that it retains its original appearance at the time the building permit is finaled by the City of Newport Beach. 14. On an annual basis, the Applicant shall conduct maintenance inspections of the wireless telecom facility, including the small cell facility and below-grade equipment areas, and make all necessary repairs. The Community Development Director may require additional inspections and/or maintenance activities at his/her discretion. 15. The Applicant shall not prevent the City of Newport Beach from having adequate spectrum capacity on the City's 800 MHz radio frequencies at any time. 16. The Project shall transmit at the approved frequency ranges established by the FCC. The Applicant shall inform the City in writing of any proposed changes to the frequency range in order to prevent interference with the City's Public Safety radio equipment. 17. The Project shall at no time interfere with the frequencies used by the City of Newport Beach for public safety. “Comprehensive advanced planning and frequency coordination” engineering measures shall prevent interference, especially in the choice of frequencies and radio ancillary hardware. This is encouraged in the "Best Practices Guide" published by the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials- International, Inc. ("APCO"), and as endorsed by the FCC. 18. Should interference with the City's Public Safety radio equipment occur, use of the telecom facility authorized by this permit may be suspended until the radio frequency interference is corrected and verification of the compliance is reported. 19. The Applicant shall provide a "single point of contact" for the carrier in its Engineering and Maintenance Departments that is monitored 24 hours per day to ensure continuity on all interference issues, and to which interference problems may be reported. The name, telephone number, fax number, and email address of that person shall be provided to the Community Development Department and Newport Beach Police Department's Support Services Commander prior to activation of the facility. If the point of contact changes, the City shall be immediately alerted and updated. 20. No advertising signage or identifying logos shall be displayed on the Project except for small identification, address, warning, and similar information plates. A detail of the information plates depicting the language on the plate shall be included in the plans submitted for issuance of building permits. 21. Appropriate information warning signs or plates shall be posted on the base streetlight pole of the transmitting antenna. In addition, contact information (e.g., a telephone number) shall be provided on the warning signs or plates. The location of the information warning signs or plates shall be depicted on the plans submitted for construction permits. Signage required by State or federal regulations shall be allowed in its smallest permissible size. Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2020-035 Page 9 of 11 02-03-2020 22. Prior to the final of building permits, the Applicant shall schedule an evening inspection by the Code Enforcement Division to confirm compliance with lighting. The telecom facility shall be lighted to the extent deemed necessary by the Newport Beach Police and Utilities Departments for security lighting and consistency with other streetlights in the area. 23. The Applicant shall maintain the Project in a manner consistent with this approval. 24. The Applicant shall ensure that its Project complies with the most current regulatory, operations standards, and radio frequency emissions standards adopted by the FCC. The Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining and maintaining the most current information from the FCC regarding allowable radio frequency emissions and all other applicable regulations and standards. This information shall be made available by the Applicant upon request of the Community Development Director. 25. The Project shall comply with all applicable provisions of U.S. Code Title 47 (Telecommunications) rules and regulations, including those related to FCC Radio Frequency safety. 26. Prior to final of building permits, the Applicant shall schedule an inspection by the Planning Division to ensure materials and colors match existing architecture as illustrated in the approved photographic simulations and in conformance with NBMC Section 21.49.050. 27. Any operator who intends to abandon or discontinue use of a telecom facility must notify the Planning Division by certified mail no less than thirty (30) days prior to such action. The operator shall have ninety (90) days from the date of abandonment or discontinuance to reactivate use of the facility, or remove the telecom facility and restore the site. 28. The City reserves the right and jurisdiction to review and modify any permit approved pursuant to NBMC Chapter 21.49, including the conditions of approval, based on changed circumstances. The operator shall notify the Planning Division of any proposal to change the height or size of the facility; increase the size, shape, or number of antennas; change the facility's color or materials or location on the site; or increase the signal output above the maximum permissible exposure ("MPE") limits imposed by the radio frequency emissions guidelines of the FCC. Any changed circumstance shall require the operator to apply for a review of the modification, and possible amendment to the use permit, prior to implementing any change. 29. Costal Development Permit No. CD2020-118 shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Section 21.54.060 (Time Limits and Extensions) of the NBMC unless an extension is otherwise granted. 30. Construction activities shall comply with Section 10.28.040 of the NBMC, which restricts hours of noise-generating construction activities that produce noise to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. Noise-generating construction activities are not allowed on Saturdays, Sundays or holidays. Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2020-035 Page 10 of 11 02-03-2020 31. This approval may be modified or revoked by the Planning Commission if determined that the proposed uses or conditions under which it is being operated or maintained is detrimental to the public health, welfare or materially injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or if the property is operated or maintained so as to constitute a public nuisance. 32. A copy of the Resolution, including conditions of approval Exhibit “A,” and approved drawings from Southern California Edison (SCE) for the power supply and design, shall be incorporated into the Building Division and field sets of plans prior to issuance of the building permits. 33. The Applicant is responsible for compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). In compliance with the MBTA, grading, brush removal, building demolition, tree trimming, and similar construction activities shall occur between August 16 and January 31, outside of the peak nesting period. If such activities must occur inside the peak nesting season from February 1 to August 15, compliance with the following is required to prevent the taking of Native Birds pursuant to MBTA: A. The construction area shall be inspected for active nests. If birds are observed flying from a nest or sitting on a nest, it can be assumed that the nest is active. Construction activity within 300 feet of an active nest shall be delayed until the nest is no longer active. Continue to observe the nest until the chicks have left the nest and activity is no longer observed. When the nest is no longer active, construction activity can continue in the nest area. B. It is a violation of state and federal law to kill or harm a native bird. To ensure compliance, consider hiring a biologist to assist with the survey for nesting birds, and to determine when it is safe to commence construction activities. If an active nest is found, one or two short follow-up surveys will be necessary to check on the nest and determine when the nest is no longer active. 34. The Applicant shall promptly notify the City if the landscaped parkway of the subject streetlight pole is negatively affected or otherwise damaged by Project implementation. 35. The applicant shall replace any privately installed landscaping disturbed as a result of the telecom installation. Any removed landscaping shall be replaced with the same species and size, wherever feasible, and provided the replacement is in compliance with any applicable encroachment agreements. 36. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Applicant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its City Council, its boards and commissions, officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses (including without limitation, attorney’s fees, disbursements and court costs) of every kind and nature whatsoever which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to City’s approval of AT&T Small Cell SLC4653, including, but not limited to, Coastal Development Permit No. CD2020-118 (PA2019-115). This Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2020-035 Page 11 of 11 02-03-2020 indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, damages awarded against the City, if any, costs of suit, attorneys' fees, and other expenses incurred in connection with such claim, action, causes of action, suit or proceeding whether incurred by Applicant, City, and/or the parties initiating or bringing such proceeding. The Applicant shall indemnify the City for all of City's costs, attorneys' fees, and damages which City incurs in enforcing the indemnification provisions set forth in this condition. The Applicant shall pay to the City upon demand any amount owed to the City pursuant to the indemnification requirements prescribed in this condition. Public Works Department 37. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, an encroachment permit shall be required. 38. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, traffic control plans illustrating compliance with the 2016 WATCHBook requirements shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department before their implementation. Large construction vehicles shall not be permitted to travel narrow streets as determined by the Public Works Department. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and flagman.