Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20190610_ApplicationCommunity Development Department Planning Permit Application CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, California 92660 949 644-3200 newportbeachca.gov/communitydevelopment F:\Users\CDD\Shared\Admin\Planning_Division\Applications\Application_Guidelines\Planning Permit Application - CDP added.docx Rev: 01/24/17 1.Check Permits Requested: Approval-in-Concept - AIC # Lot Merger Staff Approval Coastal Development Permit Limited Term Permit - Tract Map Waiver for De Minimis Development Seasonal < 90 day >90 days Traffic Study Coastal Residential Development Modification Permit Use Permit -Minor Conditional Condominium Conversion Off-Site Parking Agreement Amendment to existing Use Permit Comprehensive Sign Program Planned Community Development Plan Variance Development Agreement Planned Development Permit Amendment -Code PC GP LCP Development Plan Site Development Review - Major Minor Other: Lot Line Adjustment Parcel Map 2.Project Address(es)/Assessor’s Parcel No(s) 3.Project Description and Justification (Attach additional sheets if necessary): 4.Applicant/Company Name Mailing Address Suite/Unit City State Zip Phone Fax Email 5.Contact/Company Name Mailing Address Suite/Unit City State Zip Phone Fax Email 6.Owner Name Mailing Address Suite/Unit City State Zip Phone Fax Email 7.Property Owner’s Affidavit*: (I) (We) depose and say that (I am) (we are) the owner(s) of the property (ies) involved in this application. (I) (We) further certify, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of (my) (our) knowledge and belief. Signature(s): ________________________________ Title: Date: DD/M0/YEAR Signature(s): ________________________________ Title: Date: *May be signed by the lessee or by an authorized agent if written authorization from the owner of record is filed concurrently with the application. Please note, the owner(s)’ signature for Parcel/Tract Map and Lot Line Adjustment Application must be notarized. AT&T to remove and replace existing concrete streetlight; install a single omni-dIrectional antenna with related radio equipment within a radome shroud mounted at the top of the new streetlight within the public right of way. See attached project plans and description for additional details. Exhibit A F:\Users\PLN\Shared\Staff_Dir\Garciamay\Ruby\desktop\DESKTOP_\CUT_PASTE_DRAG_COPY\Office Use Only.docx Updated 08/15/17 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY\ Date Filed: _______________________ 2700-5000 Acct. APN No: __________________________ Deposit Acct. No. ________________________ Council District No.: _________________ For Deposit Account: General Plan Designation: ____________ Fee Pd: _______________________________________ Zoning District: _____________________ Receipt No: ____________________________ Coastal Zone: Yes No Check #: __________ Visa MC Amex # ____________ CDM Residents Association and Chamber Community Association(s): _______________________ Development No: __________________________ _____________________________________________ Project No: ________________________________ _____________________________________________ Activity No: _______________________________ Related Permits: ___________________________ APPLICATION Approved Denied Tabled: _________________________ ACTION DATE Planning Commission Meeting Zoning Administrator Hearing Community Development Director Remarks: __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ APPLICATION WITHDRAWN: Withdrawal Received (Date): ________________________ APPLICATION CLOSED WITHOUT ACTION: Closeout Date: ________________________ Remarks: __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ Exhibit - E   M  Squared  Wireless   1387  Calle  Avanzado,  San  Clemente,  CA  92673   June  10,  2019   Via  Hand  Delivery     City  of  Newport  Beach   100  Civic  Center  Drive   Newport  Beach,  CA    92660     RE:  AT&T  Application  for  a  Minor  Use  Permit  to  place  a  Small  Cell  Wireless  Facility  at  the  following  location:     Rear  side  of  1409  [CS]  Dolphin  Terrace  (SLC4653);  AT&T  Site  ID  HBNPB_038  and  FA  No.  14807367     Dear  Ms.  Makana  Nova:   New  Cingular  Wireless  PCS,  LLC  d/b/a  AT&T  Mobility  (“AT&T”)  submits  the  enclosed  application  materials  to  obtain  all  necessary   authorizations  to  construct  small  cell  wireless  facility  at  the  above  referenced  location.  If  any  additional  applications  or   information  are  needed  for  any  phase  of  this  project,  please  let  me  know.  Small  cells  are  low-­‐power,  low-­‐profile  wireless   communications  facilities  that  improve  signal  quality  and  capacity  within  AT&T’s  existing  wireless  network.  The  proposed  small   cell  facility  will  help  AT&T  provide  and  improve  critical  wireless  services  in  this  area.       Application  Contents   Pursuant  to  Newport  Beach  Municipal  Code  Section  20.50.040  B  Application  Contents,  this  application  includes  the  following   materials  and  information:     1. Minor  Use  Permit  Application  (Exhibit  A)   2. Project  Description  and  Justification  (Exhibit  B)   3. Public  Noticing  Materials  (Exhibit  C)   4. Plans;  one  (1)  set  of  24”  x  36”  and  four  (4)  sets  of  11”  x  17”  drawings  (Exhibit  D)   5. Letter  of  Authority  (Exhibit  E)     6. Pole  ownership  information,  construction  responsibilities  and  maintenance:   o The  subject  pole  is  owned  and  operated  by  City  of  Newport  Beach  (“City”).   o The  City  will  retain  ownership  of  the  existing  structure  and  AT&T  will  be  responsible  for  the  replacement,   maintenance  and  repairs  of  such  structure.   o AT&T  and  the  City  will  finalize  the  site  license  agreement  upon  permit  issuance.   o AT&T  will  maintain  the  antenna  communication  portion  of  the  new  facility.   o AT&T  will  replace  the  existing  streetlight  as  shown  on  the  plans.     o Details  of  the  existing  and  new  pole  height,  diameter  and  antenna  equipment  is  provided  on  the  attached   plans.   o The  project  will  be  designed  without  a  meter  pedestal  subject  to  the  city’s  issuance  of  a  meter  denial  letter.       7. Evidence  of  compliance  with  FCC  RF  rules:  FCC  Appendix  A  –  categorically  excluded  (Exhibit  F)     8. Photo  simulations  (Exhibit  G)     9. Preferred  location/alternatives  analysis;  see  Exhibit  B  -­‐  Project  Description  and  Justification.   10. Maintenance  and  Monitoring;  see  Exhibit  B  -­‐  Project  Description  and  Justification.     Application  Review   Under  federal  law,  the  City  of  Newport  Beach  (“City”)  must  determine  whether  the  application  is  complete  within  10  days  and   take  final  action  on  the  application  within  90  days  from  this  submittal  (the  “shot  clock”).  See  47  C.F.R.  §  1.6003.  Within  the  same   period  of  time,  the  city  must  also  take  action  with  respect  to  all  necessary  authorizations  and  approvals  for  construction  and   operation  of  the  proposed  small  cell.  The  shot  clock  begins  today  and  runs  unless  or  until  it  is  tolled,  either  by  mutual  agreement   or  based  on  a  timely  and  proper  notice  that  the  application  is  materially  incomplete.  To  toll  the  shot  clock  for  incompleteness,   the  city  must,  within  ten  days,  identify  in  writing  the  missing  information  that  is  required  by  local  codes  or  other  published   AT&T  Small  Cell  Application   City  of  Newport  Beach   Page  2  of  3   application  guidelines.  In  the  case  of  a  timely  and  proper  incomplete  notice,  the  shot  clock  stops  and  restarts  at  day  0  once  AT&T   submits  the  additional  information  required.  If  the  City  fails  to  act  before  the  shot  clock  expires,  the  City  will  be  in  violation  of   state  and  federal  laws.     • This  Application  was  filed  on  June  10,  2019.   • Notification  of  incompleteness  is  due  by  June  20,  2019.   • Absent  tolling,  the  City  must  take  final  action  by  September  9,  2019.       The  City  must  grant  all  necessary  authorizations  as  the  proposed  facility  is  consistent  with  applicable  law  and  there  is  no  basis  for   denial  under  the  local  code.       Applicable  Law   Approval  is  required  under  the  federal  Telecommunications  Act  of  1996,  47  U.S.C.  §§  253,  332  (“Act”).  The  Act,  which  was   enacted  to  prioritize  and  streamline  deployment  of  wireless  technologies,  limits  the  ability  of  state  and  local  governments  to   regulate  wireless  service.  The  Act  establishes  substantive  and  procedural  limitations  on  the  review  of  wireless  facility  siting   applications.  A  state  or  local  government  cannot  take  action  that  would  unreasonably  discriminate  against  AT&T  in  acting  on  the   application.  A  state  or  local  government  cannot  take  any  action  that  would  prohibit  or  effectively  prohibit  the  provision  of   wireless  services.  An  effective  prohibition  occurs  when  the  jurisdiction’s  denial  of  an  application  materially  limits  or  inhibits   AT&T’s  ability  to  provide  or  improve  wireless  services.  A  state  or  local  government  may  not  consider  the  effects  of  radio   frequency  emissions  when  considering  this  application.       The  city  must  review  this  application  within  a  reasonable  period  of  time,  as  defined  pursuant  to  the  shot  clock.  Any  decision  to   deny  the  application  must  be  in  writing  contemporaneously  with  the  decision  and  supported  by  substantial  evidence  contained   in  a  written  record.  The  written  denial  must  provide  the  basis  therefor  with  a  recitation  of  findings  of  fact  and  conclusions  of  law   supporting  the  denial.   Pursuant  to  the  California  Constitution  and  Section  7901  of  the  California  Public  Utilities  Code,  AT&T  has  a  statewide  franchise   right  to  construct  telecommunications  facilities  and  place  poles  within  the  public  rights-­‐of-­‐way  so  long  as  it  does  not  incommode   the  public  way.  AT&T’s  right  is  subject  only  to  the  municipality’s  authority  to  impose  reasonable  and  equivalent  time,  place  and   manner  restrictions  pursuant  to  Section  7901.1  of  the  California  Public  Utilities  Code.  AT&T’s  proposed  small  cell  facility  does  not   incommode  the  public  way.       Payment  of  an  application  deposit  totaling  $2,631.00  is  enclosed  with  this  letter.     The  FCC  set  a  standard  for  fees  such  that  only  objectively  reasonable  cost-­‐based  fees  may  be  imposed  on  a  nondiscriminatory   basis.  The  FCC  established  a  safe  harbor  for  presumptively  reasonable  fees:  $500  for  non-­‐recurring  fees  for  an  application   including  up  to  five  small  cells,  plus  $100  for  each  small  cell  beyond  five,  or  $1,000  for  non-­‐recurring  fees  for  a  new  pole  to   support  small  cells.  In  addition,  California  Government  Code  50030  limits  permit  fees  for  telecommunications  installations  to  the   reasonable  cost-­‐based  fees.  The  city  requires  a  deposit  for  application  fees,  which  is  subject  to  a  future  invoice  after  the   application  is  reviewed  and  processed.  AT&T  is  concerned  that  the  city’s  fees  may  be  excessive  and  may  violate  the  FCC’s   standard  and  the  state-­‐law  standard  for  lawful  fees.  AT&T  is  submitting  its  application  and  its  initial  deposit  for  application  fees  in   order  to  avoid  disruption  to  its  business,  but  it  does  so  under  protest  and  explicitly  reserves  its  rights  to  pursue  any  and  all  legal   remedies  for  excessive  fees.     Questions  or  notices  related  to  this  Application  may  be  directed  to:      Franklin  Orozco          Michele  Vernotico    forozco@interlinkpg.com        michele@interlinkpg.com    (619)  632-­‐2569          (949)  922-­‐1334       AT&T  Small  Cell  Application   City  of  Newport  Beach   Page  3  of  3   We  look  forward  to  working  with  you  to  complete  this  wireless  communications  project  in  Newport  Beach.       Sincerely,     Franklin  Orozco,   Agent  on  behalf  of  AT&T  and  Ericsson       FCC/LSGAC Local Official’s Guide to RF APPENDIX A Optional Checklist for Determination Of Whether a Facility is Categorically Excluded Exhibit F FCC/LSGAC Local Official’s Guide to RF Optional Checklist for Local Government To Determine Whether a Facility is Categorically Excluded Purpose: The FCC has determined that many wireless facilities are unlikely to cause human exposures in excess of RF exposure guidelines. Operators of those facilities are exempt from routinely having to determine their compliance. These facilities are termed "categorically excluded." Section 1.1307(b)(1) of the Commission's rules defines those categorically excluded facilities. This checklist will assist state and local government agencies in identifying those wireless facilities that are categorically excluded, and thus are highly unlikely to cause exposure in excess of the FCC’s guidelines. Provision of the information identified on this checklist may also assist FCC staff in evaluating any inquiry regarding a facility’s compliance with the RF exposure guidelines. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. Facility Operator’s Legal Name: 2. Facility Operator’s Mailing Address: 3. Facility Operator’s Contact Name/Title: 4. Facility Operator’s Office Telephone: 5. Facility Operator’s Fax: 6. Facility Name: 7. Facility Address: 8. Facility City/Community: 9. Facility State and Zip Code: 10. Latitude: 11. Longitude: continue FCC/LSGAC Local Official’s Guide to RF Optional Local Government Checklist (page 2) EVALUATION OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION 12. Licensed Radio Service (see attached Table 1): 13. Structure Type (free-standing or building/roof-mounted): 14. Antenna Type [omnidirectional or directional (includes sectored)]: 15. Height above ground of the lowest point of the antenna (in meters): 16. Check if all of the following are true: (a) This facility will be operated in the Multipoint Distribution Service, Paging and Radiotelephone Service, Cellular Radiotelephone Service, Narrowband or Broadband Personal Communications Service, Private Land Mobile Radio Services Paging Operations, Private Land Mobile Radio Service Specialized Mobile Radio, Local Multipoint Distribution Service, or service regulated under Part 74, Subpart I (see question 12). (b) This facility will not be mounted on a building (see question 13). (c) The lowest point of the antenna will be at least 10 meters above the ground (see question 15). If box 16 is checked, this facility is categorically excluded and is unlikely to cause exposure in excess of the FCC’s guidelines. The remainder of the checklist need not be completed. If box 16 is not checked, continue to question 17. 17. Enter the power threshold for categorical exclusion for this service from the attached Table 1 in watts ERP or EIRP∗ (note: EIRP = (1.64) X ERP): 18. Enter the total number of channels if this will be an omnidirectional antenna, or the maximum number of channels in any sector if this will be a sectored antenna: 19. Enter the ERP or EIRP per channel (using the same units as in question 17): 20. Multiply answer 18 by answer 19: 21. Is the answer to question 20 less than or equal to the value from question 17 (yes or no)? If the answer to question 21 is YES, this facility is categorically excluded. It is unlikely to cause exposure in excess of the FCC’s guidelines. If the answer to question 21 is NO, this facility is not categorically excluded. Further investigation may be appropriate to verify whether the facility may cause exposure in excess of the FCC’s guidelines. ∗"ERP" means "effective radiated power" and "EIRP" means "effective isotropic radiated power FCC/LSGAC Local Official’s Guide to RF TABLE 1 (cont.) SERVICE (TITLE 47 CFR RULE PART) EVALUATION REQUIRED IF: Personal Communications Services (part 24) (1) Narrowband PCS (subpart D): non-building-mounted antennas: height above ground level to lowest point of antenna < 10 m and total power of all channels > 1000 W ERP (1640 W EIRP) building-mounted antennas: total power of all channels > 1000 W ERP (1640 W EIRP) (2) Broadband PCS (subpart E): non-building-mounted antennas: height above ground level to lowest point of antenna < 10 m and total power of all channels > 2000 W ERP (3280 W EIRP) building-mounted antennas: total power of all channels > 2000 W ERP (3280 W EIRP) Satellite Communications (part 25) all included General Wireless Communications Service (part 26) total power of all channels > 1640 W EIRP Wireless Communications Service (part 27) total power of all channels > 1640 W EIRP Radio Broadcast Services (part 73) all included