Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
GP REVIEW 1977
Planning Commission Meeting ' November 17, 19-77 Study Session Agenda No . 1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH November 9 , 1977 TO : Planning Commission FROM: Department of Community Development SUBJECT: General Plan Review - Status Report At the Planning Commission Study Session on November 3, 1977, the Planning Commission reviewed the City Council ' s direction on the overall General Plan review. Additionally, each Planning Commissioner indicated specific areas of concern that he/she wanted addressed during the General Plan review process . The purpose of this staff report is to bring the Planning Commission up to date on the information staff has received from property owners of the major undeveloped sites within the Newport Beach planning area and information on the timing of circulation system improvements . Section I of this report will identify the major undeveloped parcels . This section will further indicate : 1 ) the u�e(s ) contemplated for each site; 2) the intensity of each development proposal ; and 3) the estimated occupancy of each site . Section II of this report will indicate the projected timing of improve- ments leading to the completion of the adopted Newport Beach circulation system. Finally, attached to this report is a copy of a memorandum from the Public Works Department indicating the major intersections and roadway links that appear to be the most immediate and/or serious traffic capacity problems . This staff report , the memorandum from Public Works Department , and Planning Commission discussion at the study session will be organized with additional data to attempt to identify problem areas in terms of possible imbalance between proposed development and support systems . Section I During the past several weeks , staff has been meeting with property owners of the major undeveloped sites in an attempt to develop an overall development schedule for vacant sites within the Newport Beach planning area . The sites investigated are indicated on Exhibit 1 . The proposed type , quantity, and detailed occupancy of each site east of the Dover/ Coast Highway Bridge is shown on Exhibit 2A. The projected type, quantity and estimates of occupancy for projects west of the Dover/ Coast Highway Bridge is shown on Exhibit 2B . A breakdown of total development by time periods and for each area will be distributed to the Planning Commission at the November 17 , 1977 Study Session. On the following exhibits , projects whose initial occupancy is to be from 1978-1980 are numbered in the 100 ' s , from 1981 to 1984 in the 200 ' s , and from 1985 to 1995 in the 300 ' s . • '��wtfrsjfj •�'�w ` � �ol , II" Aft WN '�_� r ��, •l + -mot ",a - = .< 1�WON 'ijj\. a . i 4'�r\ +�� w !(fit ( • tia. fl' ��-t ��'.�.�7{1=����� :"i:�may,•r: .0 fi'H .r.. ih � _�. ��•�i.• ��..�� _• EXHIBIT 2A } yy 7� ooxeAN.4r1ve ow6larxrlrc scxFnulx rah uxoevcw9co ehovaxrlee "EAST OR OOVER/COAST HWY. BRIDGE" '•"��? 1<SF19PJlt' fA.CI.L ACeba 0, f. 0.6610min COMIC0.CIAL CONNIEAt2/J. 888TAUTARC xo2w INW8TAIAL Ii Ie]9 eU el aE B}e/ e1 a6 e7 M 89 OaN81riC8 O.U'e SQ.OPTICE MAIL 60. R. 80Q18 a0. rt. w• rt. a6. rt. gg�pcc Q ilk g���i3xu I + COLL CENTER pJA p I,'', fft I• 101' Smil-uegbid . 12 No •f �Cotpomta of flrcn 113 WO (A M '1'103 eulld to utlt, ' hrxm off lerb _ 12.300 D ' „ { 104 Wrpgr.ea nrllr.btdn 10e I a trod nmuun D _r_._.__ Np 1O7_8L•t•1mt_tlte 2 1/2 /✓0 I 1OD Caryaran o flu bld . 17l,000 1OD o.euyy t.bldy_ li2,000 6 O p .�jlk 1ta,aoo 6{ Phos , N'. �.... 1r. y aN 111 11oul .1e• wtawr„ No lV t .. •F� ' 1 •1 ! e3,00 x• � ?,y•, 11 �stl, 114 offlne a... 17 313 00o �C i rl AIRMTe0NVO too •no 1 ld. dl d.v. 100 3.3 du4/.e S!o �a'1Ar9 } •+ .relyFnd d.v. I r �Y` 1 •'a INVINt COMPANY �f1I q9 A� , � •,t Ironer r.,vrvMioe pd 90111,CAR, 60,OYo 60.000 6 V 6v N_wjnrt.YI IIALLa.---' 14 -- ---- � ' lo0 0to 0 1 U. ' 4pvp North Ford 76 .675,000 • lnduRr el I ' 120_7__—L-- �d • n 9 —a 36.3m 1 121—e.J.1d.I_-9nar�_. 1.7 1 t ��Ivtg F1on 16 130,000 N.rbn N111 9 6 duo/ac R Nu,urt :Pour 7J0,000 • t ' 124_xip;1 xgn_�'gn_ xget4, 10 — , It,QN,y Url 10 12 t9 160 e—A �Inl. -- NU p t 12S 4a.tb.y_, Se 6 du'o/.c 34e • o ee 6 du'.Fee 70/ • rnu nvn u• Id nefnl 60 a du'./.c 330 !tl,nv«. Carr Llor 9 /W.A. !4 12D t. I Ste our. rnrridur 19 6 W.I.. 3l1 ' 131 Mpvlev Lendtn 17 A 10,000 7,500 1200 • I , ' fr...oY nartmtl•n 12 132�oq, (eoyrr�nnrd.n. Sri.Ave. frrr lJor 6 6 dn'd.e 26 . o! �, ;I 133 •. hl h Au . xv 7nI, /� � N.,.,t Crntor 430.000 /V(-} l&& ol e• t 134_LrA 600 (rnydentlol !1 2 NrWnn J1Jp ,p,� • t� 1D6 C.e,h.r._rrnter eWk 80D _ —9 _ 2d5 p �I t t'u toy.+ • ,n;_nnn•Inl 21 16,000 230 - ✓ 13O-VmwnyyNi•nr,vnt lim • ___— _•_'-'-_ __ __ I. 137 Hare A) twk.,Vt., 26 a do or 208 " d deour n ��l�x��nn43 Elm&x_%_L34!)9u; 2O1MM-dL?'°IvCun 2021 n__sfl_iI _No_th o " X �1,000- 125 • ,I! 2035e ___ P _t u 10 120.000 yq� A 204 rAtthur AvuuJu 9 160.OW Wour t11 -.Lx IT n4 D nrnx6rli-e4-tv 301 II Jrtmeurn_,--_ 19 '175,000or a '• 9O2 yltaorn.IMnaAr[ear _ 2 60.000 SS,oW V • 1 r i1 17p,ppp el ' DO3 S.2ou o ru eau North Ford / 40.000 • ' OO4.1r a?.2•erJ•i t ' 0 4 TO: Planning Commission - 2 "COMPARATIVE DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE FOR UNDEVELOPED PROPERTIES" -West of Dover/Coast Highway Bridge- EXHIBIT 2B Comm. Office n,d Res . Sq. Sq . Comments IV Description Acres DU' s Ft. Ft. Development Timing/Occupancy 771 138 Banning Residential 150 900 Construction Initiated rb Prior to 1980 6 139 Caltrans (N . Coast 17.26 255 ' Construction Initiated Highway, West Prior to 1980 S�c& 140 ior) � a ltrans (N. Coast 22 . 86 274 Construction Initiated Highway, East Prior to 1980 fNU,perior) 205 Res . S . F. ( North 21 . 31 126 Construction Subsequent ext. of 16th to 1980 Nq PC Street) 206 Res . M. F. (South 31 .43 465 Construction Subsequent Ext. of 16th St. ) to 1980 207&Caltrans (S . Coast 5 . 15 R-2 Construction Subsequent to Highway, P , E. 1980 No /oc,-W) 305 Small-Craft 292 1926 Unk . Unk. Oil Least Expires in 1994. Harbor Possible development prior with agreement lease. � 1 a. TO : Planning Commission - 3 "TOTAL PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT - ALL SITES"' Residential 6 ,928 Dwelling Units2 Commercial Office 2 ,858, 300 Sq . Ft. Commercial Retail 193,000 Sq . Ft. 3 Restaurant 103,500 Sq . Ft.4 Hotel 575 Rooms Industrial 1 ,537 ,000 Sq . Ft. IDoes not include Commercial /Office/Restaurant in conjunction with West Newport Harbor. 2Does not include Caltrans R-O-W South Coast Highway, West Newport area . 3Does not include "Mouth of Big Canyon" site . 4Does not include restaurants in Koll Center. 5Does not include hotel in Emkay . Section II This section of the staff report attempts to indicate the projected timing of improvements to the adopted Newport Beach circulation system. The timing of improvements to the circulation system has been organized into the same ( short range - present to 1980 , mid-range 1981 -85 , and long-range 1985-95 ) time frames as was the information report. Exhibit 3 gives the location and the in Section I of this rep projected timing of improvements for both public projects and development related projects . Exhibit 4 describes each projected improvement and indicates in greater detail their projected timing. \ EXHIBIT 3 Arterial Highway i . -d � ;. � � ,ram�. .1.ti. /r,♦ -- l� 1• �' ' `ate-�1'" � /% iir x�C�' /1`1�.s'` y!�•� �l"13 �" '� •� ♦ � ��-•_. : Improvement _ M� Lam/hedul VA -ref*tf 1' ",.'h7%: :! m"� c•. a u r g¢ ! �t / 1 1985 — 995 aSal 985 %\ .•�� M, Under construction by 12/77 ,{^,g'� =mil' t dd Fl i �-... �. t. , 1J 2EK ,, `�.a��'� - city of :^�3 �-. �� �"ff,',�( t�__��J+tJc•!!�'\>':. � i xl�, �t`4T���u43.�V..�-d.r ate^ y _ /1,i� 1 ,.�L`.�.i' �' i .+.. '!-'� �S`.� `�`�`..,•\ �,�;�.�=��__� - NEWPORT BEACH _-�=-n_ �"x' .ii i+rii'xi .+"ii..�,,lr.,.- � '•". n�7 Cu1 ••'�^��.•-.y =z�- ^.- lii,�{lilt t t:::7, ."',c�.�nCc��-v•T . .»„��;;c�..--•.�jam __ --5s! '` 0 - 2400 4800 scale In e -1 feet PACIFIC OCEAN ADVANCE ALANNINO DIVISION 1.1 8 -77 r s t r p �,l • .�, N'N:J.�a:LL pRL..T RCIICCUID iC tlIIAf3 SY.ANt AR.tr:9KDJCTa .�•;CHIBI ITT 4 r 7 lacwcon-contiguous to opacl[ia d"Olopa " Uwaa.Wait,L.pmtvBmt) }' 1 I...I/non-I'lle.ntig.to,ami losecat Ir Icplsaonfauon attract. mt[..SA rWMant rR.at - C.ttoory lactomentation Proafm 'VXT' 77 1. 1. BO B 1977 - 1. ComnA del Her)"Way Rena," CRIU.. (und r am trial. 9.oncoca road project I. Jurboraa M vidaning Regional city/Aw➢ ImM r can Cruet anI raitblu[i to McArthur vi III bride.widening at So,Diego crook d. Bupsrlor wid.ling loin/ran City (Nod x con tauo w) > IMu.tal.1 to Dena Al 1977- 80 yy a. Jaolvwe ad vid.ning lo.al/mn CID (a..I.l.6) (rarr itt" lea Island honrag. ' 6. PM wld.ninp south aid. Regional Gltran./City IN (am ittall1tA; lath at. to Santa Me Rival t ', , 6, McArthur a,"-Carpo. local/non coltrN./City/cmNty, (rose ittedl •apt intersection.Drovaunts city or Ixrin./CID i 7. M"rtM1ur Blvd-Toed M Regional Gltrone/City/Ci9/ am Stt" intersection uprweOmtn t A. Jamban. M widening 100e1/con Gpital uprov.woe a j• test ciao rote M.eleon policy trard-lecon A) A.tY 1 1. reer M 1 San Jwpuln local/non G[Y A free right cum W. Simon xiGnln q eou.aldc 30c.1/can c:p (lone-Reionga }•1 JSAbone to C.m"-b.ek � it. PM xldeclnp-Reylldt . Regional .lt.R./rAu 1 ttk act. RCN to Chef Drive t?). 12. PCD 1 Jaxle..-in.l1. Region.) lealtrans/City/cIP . ' r in..ectlon iap...nt S�t, la. Jamacras M wldallog.-ors local/con C[P (North Ford) 1 tfad) '� kks•,�;; .ids aeon to D.tblu[[ 1/. man Niguel hr. -Ma"Rew local/can C Oahe, (ivy ru- ' to San Joeculn ...th) I. U. lord M vid.ning-north loagl/roc all (Harbor Ridge) (a time) aid.DeOArthur to eon Mon 1 Icity or Irvine) " t It. POW.cYwndan•wi.t 1...1/ecn all Ieorporst.class) 1 treat aid.T.rellan to PM lr It. Dover at. videcing at lwal/con air 1+ 1 Cut...ya lean.,. 20, gad also., Ur.. M.'"thur I...l/tan Cip/mrp (OC'1D WE , t.Av.cta. t.cRL.1) IL. %Leon.Y.n.lon to jowl/wn CIP/mIr/C.1tIon. ' MOWN., 32 Jasba.s M vId.ninj I...1/Con cry IH.vpor.r North) W=It.r IM to 1.J.agui ' 1980-85 16. PM vLashing-BUA et. Regional GStran./mr, ,t .11.1.e- sWtA.Ids T U, Ruporiar St-PM to 1..al/non city/Cip/ur➢ ' plec.ntia I!. dlsborll widening north loon/fan Cip ($.Wis.farming) N ' o[ PCN 24. PCN widening-MOArehur Regional 10103 to layslds Including O"ba".inte.ection iff"Orron nta ' 21. MtArthur/e%omdo cao,)Bt Regional Caltrane/CIr/anIP/rAD x •� 614 J.N.in Hill.M to➢C 1 It. .albl.lt es.nalcA ).calicon CI➢/ANFp/Gltrae. 1 J.nbo.t to Me6rNYr l 29. B.A J.Mo little Mad RAgion.l cip/AP➢ aDY'I'A.to C"ve. III Newport Blvd- PM to Regional Caltron./City/Cip 3I16 St. (in.. Arch.) 33. ford M aw.L. ReDIonal "My" (City 09 z S.Higual to Daniel CYa 3 a 34. r-c othur Blvd vlSanlng Regional Caltem./AAWYAU Y Told M to cant.Croon i 3g. Coast utyhvay it Arches to D.IbO.A,.. Regional Caltun."AU 1 31. .fat Highv.y l At Hev,,Ort IhreMe) Regional Calera./➢Au lot n.Ntnp. )' 1985.95 13. Cnronn Gal Mer I,....Y Regional cnitran, (City/Caonty x MINN Mo 0 IN L OR.truct "MILL to priority list) JrNxe. I). Unlv.wity Dr..rtecslon Region" City/AWP x Irvin.t0 JwbOr.. is. Jatlorot M widening Regional city/AHSP We at side rord to..tblut 36. MecAxMr Blvd vldecing Regional Caltrons/MPY/➢AD N •'l.O' man Joaauln to fora M ' t 37. Coast Nlghv.y R.gl...I eale.n./rAU 'F Dover to the Arches it la. COt.o.1.1 Mer NY tonal. Aep/onLL C.itach. IDStY/County Y OWN J"rea t.loti.CYn M Pclarity list) ) 30. 3tA JwgYIA Irantp•Co[rldo Regional County x Meng t er at Y) III it.to Nlver Delve end I t b0yond to Reuss ! , I ti l tl I y a f S. TO: Planning Commission - 4 Discussion It is the intent of staff in subsequent reports to the Planning Commission to provide information on project ultimate growth and development timing for the older established commercial and residential portions of the planning area . Further, staff will be further quantifying existing data to allow for comparisons of intehsity/density and total occupied space at various timeframes ( i .e. , total structure space commercial office in 1980, 1985 and 1995 ) . This information will allow the Planning Commission to make comparisons in terms of possible imbalance between proposed development and support systems . In subsequent reports , staff intends to provide answers to those additional questions and issues raised at the November 3, 1977 Planning Commission Study Session (i .e . , traffic generation of various land uses , definitions of service levels , definitions of intersection deficiencies , etc. ) The next task identified (Tentative Work Schedule - Planning Commission Staff Report of November 3, 1977) will be the development of alternative plans for the undeveloped sites within the planning area. Staff will continue to develop data on the undeveloped sites within the planning area and to identify problems in terms of the support systems during the course of the General Plan review process. Public Participation It is the intent of staff to provide for public participation in the General Plan review process as appropriate. This could be accommodated through additional public hearings prior to the February, 1978 amendment session or through informal briefings with interested groups and individuals . The Planning Commission may wish to suggest additional direction for staff in this regard . Suggested Action Staff suggests that the Planning Commission review the information generated on the major undeveloped sites within the planning area , the timing of proposed improvements to the circulation system, and the memorandum from the Public Works Department on the City' s Most immediate and/or serious traffic capacity problems . Staff would further suggest that the Planning Commission indicate any additional information they desire (beyond that which we have indicated the Planning Commission will be receiving at subsequent hearings ) and indicate a general direction for staff to take in the preparation of alternative plans for the undeveloped sites . Yours very truly, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R. V. Hogan, Dire ror By_ �4/� F r e al a A c fffo Senior Planner FT: jmb Attachments : 1 ) Memorandum from Public Works Department. 2 ) Map indicating key elements of circulation system. 3) Staff report from Public Works Department to City Council 11 /14/77 "Progress Report and Information on the Accuracy of the Transportation Model " . • 0 9, November 10, 1977 TO: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: KEY TRANSPORTATION ROUTES AND LINKS RELATED TO GENERAL PLAN REVIEW Listed below are key elements of the circulation system having a significant relationship to the current general plan re- view. Major elements are listed, together with particular links or intersections requiring special attention. Other key elements may be identified later as the traffic model and the general plan review progress further. 1 . Pacific Coast Highway, all . a. Balboa Boulevard-Superior intersection b. Riverside intersection c. Jamboree intersection 2. Balboa Boulevard, extension northerly of Coast Highway 3. Superior Avenue, Coast Highway to Hoag Road 4. University Drive, Irvine Avenue to MacArthur Boulevard 5. Second Bay Crossing, as recommended in Alan M Voorhees study 6. Corona del Mar Freeway-Bristol Street frontage roads 7. San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor 8. Jamboree Road, Coast Highway to Eastbluff Drive North a. Jamboree-San Joaquin Hills Road intersection 9. MacArthur Boulevard-San Joaquin Hills Road-San Miguel Drive-Avocado Avenue intersection complex �j ,ARFGE�VuUs nmmuNly _ Develepnnnl -,�, Benjamin B. Nolan Depl. City Engineer N�� 1 01y7CiTy Or- 'u' 9 BBN:jd l IJEWpoRt ©EACH, Ip 2 GALIF. JJ N Ili KEY ROUTES LINKS qx- 41 pt .�l� ,. ��o :.���;`.ram' \ G��1�'�_�=-�13'"��� ^�� ^ � "• � •• <.�f..- ,,,�e 1• �.�,, ,,� t - Ate` .`J % r`���"�. � _� , e YV / 1f ✓ /'� �cv � ^ti....a —.�ti, �'4 ��fy�ps'a�1$$6�:�, � \� � `mac f..aa..v r i'}✓'t"•� rsy �,yC"�� .� �'��'y`.''- _ 1 1 . 5 �� .,4 . —-' 1 �� f�w 2 ,, , •'�``rr � �- . `�_-;,1��d' city of 04 ,F'✓ % i.3 �•.. ��-f�14�.Rr�Q.f'� T,�lY j 1�i/s'^I i�v�'''��.�pnnJ�:e!(SJ, ��`'J'�'r.M 3 - = --- •" :_:.y::. = s :- - NEWPORT BEACH Qib it Milt .r 1'ti" , -�•F•.» r� ! r - `n.^'...�.�i C�,�l' .1,)ice` i b let --,-..�`� - -A ='G`"'`'ar_t �`.tl �•'.� •,3.�,T-��-' "'i •''r, ' ice- _ __ - ��'-c-. ,�J `i __ -�-d,a . ill 1 ..�..-.._. :..!���j'`�r �"'_ -- - l 0 2400 4800 .�ia�. v a. �� , 1n EN . ' feet PAC i F I C OCEAN -- ADVANCE !•LANNINO OIVIiION 77•70•77 O - gJ RC��nu�E� \�� November 14 1977 Devef..Pvletnt , Dout. NOt/ 11 STUDY SESSION AGENDA �1 ITEM NO. 10 CITY OF �•'� NEWPORT QEAC 2 \di CALIF• H, TO: CITY COUNCIL \4 t rfi FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: PROGRESS REPORT AND INFORMATION ON THE ACCURACY OF THE TRANSPORTATION MODEL CONCLUSIONS: 1 . An origin and destination survey is not necessary to assure accuracy'of the Model . 2. The Transportation Model can be updated at anytime additional transportation data is available. 3. A letter should be sent to the Orange County Environmental Management Agency in support of the County's proposed vehicle license plate survey for the coastal area. 4. The 1978-79 budget should include funds for maintaining, operating and updating the Transportation Model . DISCUSSION: The City Council on October 11 , 1977 requested the staff to provide information on the accuracy of the "Transportation Model" and the need and desirability to conduct origin and destination surveys as input for the Model . The staff requested Herman Basmaciyan and Associates, the City's consultant, to summarize the procedures used in developing the Transportation Model with specific emphasis on the accuracy of the Model and the need to conduct origin and destination surveys. Attached is a copy of the consultant's report. The staff has reviewed the report and concur with the consultant's conclusions and recommendations contained on Pages 8 and 9. The consultant will be present at the Council meeting to review his report and answer any questions the Council may have. The staff concurs with the consultant that the "Existing Conditions Model" validation procedures adequately duplicates existing travel patterns, An origin and eliminating the need to conduct origin and destination surveys. destination survey sampling five percent of the households in Newport Beach would cost approximately $50,000 and take approximately ten months to complete. This type of survey would only provide transportation data for Newport Beach residents and would not provide adequate data on regional and through trips. 0 IL Study Session Agenda Item No. 10 -2- November 14, 1977 The procedures used to develop the Transportation Model will allow the City to modify and update the "Existing Conditions" and "Future Conditions" Models when new data becomes available. Currently, the Orange County Environ- mental Management Agency proposes to conduct a vehicle license plate survey for the Coastal area between the Santa Ana River and Dana Point. The EMA staff estimates they will ask the Board of Supervisors in the next month or so to approve the project and authorize the submittal of consultant proposals. Summer and winter data from this project should be available in October, 1978 and could be used in further validating and or updating the City's Transportation Models, Bill E. Darnell Traffic Engineer Attachment BED:bcd 1� Herman Consulting Services Engineering/Planning BOSmadyan Transportation Transit and Associates Traffic 1821 Port Renwick, Newport Beach, California 92660 (714) 640.5737 November 8, 1977 Mr. Bill E. Darnell, Traffic Engineer City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 Subject : The "Existing Conditions" Model Procedures and Validation Dear Bill : In accordance with our discussions on this subject, . enclosed is a report which summarizes the procedures used in the development of the "Existing Conditions" traffic circulation model, describes the validation (or calibration) procedures, and assesses the need or desirability to conduct Origin and Destination Surveys . It is concluded that: - The "Existing Conditions" model duplicates current traffic patterns adequately; therefore, origin and destination (0-D) surveys are not required to assure model accuracy. - Comprehensive "at-home" type 0-D surveys are costly and time consuming. In the future special purpose 0-D surveys at major travel generators or vehicle license plate surveys to describe major travel patterns may be used to refine and up- date the model and would be more cost effective than compre- hensive.areawide "at-home" 0-D surveys. - The Orange County Environmental Management Agency (EMA) is considering conducting vehicle license plate surveys along portions of the Orange County coast between Newport Beach and Mr. Bill E. Darnell -2- November 8, 1977 Dana Point. The City of Newport Beach should cooperate with the EMA to ensure that such a vehicle license plate survey is conducted as soon as possible and that the results are made available to the city to be used in model refinement and up- dating. Please call me if I can provide further details or answer any questions. Sincerely, HERMAN BASMACIYAN AND ASSOCIATES I Herman Basmaciyan, HB.b Enc. THE "EXISTING CONDITIONS" MODEL for NEWPORT BEACH AND SURROUNDING AREA PROCEDURES AND VALIDATION November, 1977 Submitted by: HERMAN BASMACIYAN, P.E. _ 16 CONTENTS Paste GENERAL 1 MODELLING PROCEDURES AND DATA SOURCES 2 Land Use and Socio-Economic Information 2 Network Data 2 Trip Generation Data 3 Trip Distribution (Origin- Destination Patterns) 3 SUMMARY OF VALIDATION PROCEDURE 4 ORIGIN AND DESTINATION SURVEYS 5 Types of 0-D Surveys 5 Types of Information Collected 6 Time Required for 0-D Surveys 8 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8 • • �7. I THE "EXISTING CONDITIONS" MODEL PROCEDURES AND VALIDATION GENERAL The question has been raised as to the need and desirability to conduct origin and destination surveys in conjunction with the City's traffic circulation model development effort. The following discussion examines many inter-related facets of this issue in order to present all necessary facts and considerations for decision-making. A. The City of 'Newport Beach is part of a vast Region and travel to and from and through the City constitutes a large portion of the total traffic volume on the City's major road and street facilities. Therefore, an origin and destination survey must be structured such that all components of traffic can be assess- , ed. B. The fact that the City of Newport Beach is part of a vast Region enables it to take advantage of the planning resources and data information developed at the County and Regional levels. C. Origin-and-Destination (O-D) surveys are generally conducted for either of the following two purposes: 1. To develop data for a specific component of the total trip- making in an area. Such 0-D surveys are useful in applica- tions such as corridor planning, specific facility planning, and comparable circumstances. 2. To develop travel pattern data on a comprehensive areawide basis. Such 0-D surveys are generally used as the basis for travel modelling and calibration. In general O-D surveys conducted for purpose "1" are smaller scale efforts than those for purpose "2". Generally, regional or areawide planning agencies conduct comprehensive areawide 0-D surveys while transportation improvement implementation agencies are primarily interested in specific travel components and conduct special purpose O-D surveys, as appropriate, to assist in specific facility planning. D. In any modelling effort it is important to develop a good data base and to ensure that the model is "calibrated" or "validated" -2- 18. to duplicate existing conditions with reasonable accuracy. It is equally important to understand that, in any modelling effort, when relationships developed on the basis of observed conditions are applied to assess or to predict potential future behavior, a major assumption must be made that the observed relationship between independent and dependent variables remain constant over time. (For example, if a household with certain characteristics --such as size, income, dwelling unit type, number of autos owned, etc. -- generates 12 vehicular trips per day now, a house- hold with the same characteristics will generate the same number of trips per day tenor twenty years from now.) This assumption of stability in relationships over time is inherent in every step of the travel model including trip generation, trip distribution, model split, and trip assignment. MODELLING PROCEDURES AND DATA 'SOURCES The "Existing Conditions" model for the City of Newport Beach (in- cluding a large surrounding area) is based on the following data sources : A. Land Use and Socio-Economic Information 1. Existing land use estimated for each Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) by: a. CDD for Newport Beach b. CDD for Costa Mesa c. Consultants for portions of Irvine based on data supplied by Irvine. d. Consultants for portions of Santa Ana based on data supplied by Santa Ana. e. LARTS estimates for areas outside "Primary" Study Area 2. Household characteristics based on 1976 special census data at various levels of aggregation. B. Network Data 1. Link Distances - Actual measurements on appropriate scale maps. 2. Speeds - Field measurements by Newport Beach and Costa Mesa using a "floating car" technique and from speed limit data. it • �9. -3- 3. Number of Lanes - Actual conditions (exclusive left-turn through and exclusive right-turn lanes) determined from records or field observations if necessary. 4. Facility classification - from records. C. Trip Generation Data 1. Actual field measurements for the following: a. In Newport Beach - Park Newport Apartments - Baywood Apartments - Promontory Point - Coves - Eastbluff - Harbor- View Homes - Big Canyon - Jasmine Creek - Hoag Hospital - Newport Center Medical Complex (Avocado) - Placentia Medical Complex - Newporter Inn - Several Restaurants - Lido Island - Fashion Island b. In Costa Mesa - Orange Coast College - FEDCO - South Coast Plaza Shopping Center c. Other - Orange County Airport 2. Where field data was not available, trip generation rates from observations elsewhere were used. D. Trip Distribution (Origin-Destination Patterns) The trip distribution procedure combines LARTS regional travel pattern information and local tripmaking in the Study Area. Thus it permits the focusing of intense attention upon the Study Area while the external influences are also reflected. • 20. .4- 1. Summary of LARTS Trip Distribution Procedure: a. On basis of 1967 0-D Survey data, develop models for 1967 ,conditions. b. Validate that models indeed duplicate 1967 actual ground count conditions. c. Use models to "predict" mid-1970's conditions d. Validate that the model "predictions" match actual ground count conditions. 2. Summary of Newport Beach Model Procedures: a. Establish cordon around Newport Beach/Costa Mesa Study Area and identify cordon crossings. b. Identify LARTS Zones within Area c. Obtain following information from LARTS: Internal Trips (between each pair of internal LARTS Zones) - Internal/External Trips (to/from each internal zone to/from each cordon crossing) - Through Trips (between each pair of cordon crossings) - Total cordon crossings d. Verify that total cordon crossings match actual ground counts. e. Discard internal trips f. Use Gravity Model Formula to estimate internal/external trips on basis of TAZs. g. Expand Internal/External trips using estimated total trip ends. h. Add in "through" trips. SUMMARY OF VALIDATION PROCEDURE Major validation points are: A. 1967 LARTS model output vs. 1967 ground counts - regional checks by LARTS. B. Mid-1970's LARTS model output vs, ground counts - regional checks by LARTS. C. "Existing Model" Cordon crossings vs. present ground counts - along entire cordon. D. After completion of "Existing Model, " comparisons of model out- put vs, ground counts along selected screenlines and on major facilities in the internal area (Data to be presented.) 1 -5- Based on a review of the various validation steps, especially step D which pertains specifically to the Study Area, it is concluded that the "Existing Conditions" model is capable of duplicating exist- ing travel patterns satisfactorily. ORIGIN AND DESTINATION SURVEYS While it does not appear that 0-D surveys are necessary for model development, for purposes of information a general overview of 0-D survey techniques is presented below: A. Types of 0-D Surveys 1. At the home - Documents all tripmaking by an entire house- hold in one day. a. Personal interview - app. $40-$50 per interview b. Telephone interview - app. $20-$30 per interview C. *Questionnaire - app. $10 per returned questionnaire * Not a recommended procedure - bias in returns During 1976 LARTS conducted a very small sample "at-home" survey to update the 1967 0-D survey. When the results of this small sample survey are available, the City can investigate the possibilities of using the information in updating or refining the "Existing Conditions" model. It should be recognized that a small sample survey must be evaluated thoroughly and utmost care must be used in its application. 2. At the roadside - Documents the specific single trip of an individual vehicle. a. Personal interview b. *Questionnaire c. Color-coded card d. License plate recording at specified crossings. The Orange County Environmental Management Agency (ERA) is considering such a survey for the Coastal Area of Orange County between the Santa Ana River and Dana Point. * followed b license late check. e. Photo 1 p Y * Not recommended procedures. 7z, -6- Cost is variable depending on traffic volume, control problems, hours of operation, specific methodology, etc. 3. Users of Specific Travel Generators - Documents the specific single trip of a person or vehicle going to/from the generator. a. Personal interview b. Questionnaire c. License plate checks (matched against DMV records) Examples: Airports, major parks, major employment centers, beaches, shopping centers , ferry crossings. Cost is variable depending on traffic volume, control problems, hours of operation, specific methodology, etc. 4. Truck/Taxi Surveys Conducted usually by analyzing the trip records of each vehicle, or by requesting that the driver make a complete report of all trips on a given day. B. Types of Information Collected: 1. At - home surveys a. Household Characteristics - Number of persons - Ages - Licensed Drivers - Type of Residence - Number of Autos - Employment Status of Residents - Other Is. Tripmaking Characteristics For each trip by each members of the household: - Origin of trip (at home or other specific address) - Destination of trip (home or other specific address) - Time of trip - Mode of travel (auto, bus, etc.) - Purpose of trip - Other 23. -7- c. Other information as desired - Attitudinal questions - Opinions 2. At the Roadside a. Vehicle Characteristics - Classification: auto, truck, etc. (by observation) - State of registration - Where vehicle is garaged - Number of occupants (by observation) b. Trip Characteristics - Origin of trip by specific address or - Destination of trip recognizable location - Time of trip (by observation) - Purpose of trip c. Other - Attitudinal questions At the Roadside (License Plate or Color-Coded Cards) a. State of Registration (License Plate only) b. Crossing Point - both crossings c. Time .of trip 3. Users of Specific Travel Generators Varies based on the type of survey and the type of travel generator. 4. Truck/Taxi Surveys a. Vehicle Characteristics - Place where vehicle is garaged - Size, number of axles, weight capacity (trucks only) - Other b. Trip Characteristics - For each trip: - Origin of trip - Destination of trip - Time of trip - Purpose of trip - Number of persons transported (taxi only) - Type and amount of goods carried (trucks only) - Other I i i 2q -8- C. Time Required for 0-D Surveys Many steps are inherent in conducting 0-D surveys : 1. Design of Procedures a. Sample selection b. Documentation of specific methodology c. Design of forms or questionnaires d. Quality control procedures 2. Training of personnel 3. Field testing procedures 4. Modification/refinement of procedures 5. Field Work 6. Coding of returns 7. Factoring or the expansion of the sample 8. Analysis of results The time required to complete a comprehensive "At Home" type 0-D survey is a minimum of six months. Depending on the area of coverage and the complexity of the survey, the time required may be as long as ten months to a year. Other types of less complex surveys such as .those at special travel generators can be completed in a shorter time ,period. Simple O-D surveys can be accomplished in four to six weeks assuming that all necessary manpower and resources are concen- trated to accomplish the task. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION The validation procedure for the "Existing Conditions" model is quite rigorous, and the model is considered satisfactory in describing existing travel patterns. The ability exists to update the model as additional data is developed at the regional or county level or at the Specific Travel Generator level. 25, -g- To be of any value at "At Home" type Origin and Destination (0-D) survey must encompass not only Newport Beach but considerable surrounding area since the tripmaking of persons who reside out- side the City but travel into the City must also be ascertained. The magnitude of such an effort is ipmtense. To sample 5.0 percent of the households in Newport Beach alone would cost approximately $50,000. At the roadside, the interview technique presents considerable operational and safety problems - queing, pulling in and out of traffic on congested roads, etc. The color-coded card technique has similar problems, but to a lesser extent. A vehicle license plate survey appears to be best suited for determining major travel patterns and constitutes a cost- effective way of obtaining considerable information due to the geographic characteristics of Newport Beach and the patterns of roads and streets. Since the Orange County Environmental Management Agency (ERA) is considering a vehicle license plate survey in the Coastal Area between the Santa Ana River and Dana Point, the City of Newport Beach should cooperate with the EMA to ensure that the survey is conducted as early as possible. Surveys of Users of Specific Travel Generators are considered valuable additional information items to further refine and supplement the model. Information from such future surveys can be used in the model updating process. 0-D Surveys are time-consuming efforts. A comprehensive "At- Home" 0-D survey would require a minimum of six months, perhaps up to a year, to complete. Less complex surveys can be completed within four to six weeks. Planniri,g Commission Meeting November 17 , 1977 Study Session Agenda No . 1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH November 9 , 1977 TO : Planning Commission FROM: Department of Community Development SUBJECT: General Plan Review - Status Report At the Planning Commission Study Session on November 3, 1977, the Planning Commission reviewed the City Council ' s direction on the overall General Plan review. Additionally, each Planning Commissioner, indicated specific areas of concern that he/she wanted addressed during the General Plan review process . The purpose of this staff report is to bring the Planning Commission up to date on the information staff has received from property owners of the major undeveloped sites within the Newport Beach planning area and information on the timing of circulation system improvements . Section I of this report will identify the major undeveloped parcels . This section will further indicate : 1 ) the use(s ) contemplated for each site; 2) the intensity of each development proposal ; and 3) the estimated occupancy of each site . Section II of this report will indicate the projected timing of improve- ments leading to the completion of the adopted Newport Beach circulation system. Finally, attached to this report is a copy of a memorandum from the Public Works Department indicating the major intersections and roadway links that appear to be the most immediate and/or serious traffic capacity problems . This staff report, the memorandum from Public Works Department, and Planning Commission discussion at the study session will be organized with additional data to attempt to identify problem areas in terms of possible imbalance between proposed development and support systems . Section I During the past several weeks , staff has been meeting with property owners of the major undeveloped sites in an attempt to develop an overall development schedule for vacant sites within the Newport Beach planning area . The sites investigated are indicated on Exhibit 1 . The proposed type , quantity, and detailed occupancy of each site east of the Dover/ Coast Highway Bridge is shown on Exhibit 2A. The projected type, quantity and estimates of occupancy for projects west of the Dover/ Coast Highway Bridge is shown on Exhibit 2B . A breakdown of total development by time periods and for each area will be distributed to the Planning Commission at the November 17, 1977 Study Session . On the following exhibits , projects whose initial occupancy is to be from 1978-1980 are numbered in the 100 ' s , from 1981 to 1984 in the 200 ' s , and from 1985 to 1995 in the 300 ' s . 'Y �p / ���1h� y t1• �_ Lam- �+• ,� : .r ���►R.-L�' � , �< '�- y � �i.•p-I r ( .p rn ♦ t L\�1 r, v . �' '� 1 yr. � • 7J DOxPARAi1VB OCVELOPMC%t SCHOOL%TOR UNDEVELOPED PROPERTIES EXHIBIT 2A "EAST OR DOVERCOAST HWY. BRIDGE" +1}: West. e<REB 0, P. RbsID1MW. COITIERCW. COMAlltciA4 sq. n.A%I awns Iq. ITR1A4 7] 1B 19 ed Bl 91 w B4 BS 66 61 M tl9 I UINSRILB D.u'e O ME MAIL %0• R. 0.0G115 60. IT. r,�y sq. n. T Ho ld l—INI_TyL QCC}'INXryY�1n 1V110 I LOLL 4CNtCR 1O1' Rrng,ulnNe xla . 11 000 • ';'I - f• t 1pijCorPorut.oIf1,. 175,w0 Now build to a�lyL• 5D 21 o 103�uxJLL urrlfn b . _ _ _x- 104 corporpw eft tf.Able.• 106 rge tnud,•pggnn4 % ' 100 nr�;.l.�urone % ' 107 Ilut_� ncrm 1111 10/ Cao rp .A n..eta . vs,wo " 1OY_io-Clore fit..bid,. Itx,Do° 1w,000 0 ' 11O.�5^Yt... Irr „ .•, 111 N.,tr� .u. uammm mmy Dtv. 113 ROW ! BRING �ti• 114 ate.e.v. 17 365 No • •�•.It 1 I' A1RamTRON1°Tow ' 116_9nld�fd dw, 'Do 5.5 tu'..e 5507 1' Wow I WINE COMPANY IrervnY remrvnr t^n q! 90 " 4 it I 60,000 60.00 " I A r.a n)%ultf•fr.11y [;6 North Torn 675,000 • tiQi . t 5xo,000!6 Groner10 150,000SIN Conyers Arw 10 160 1Q6704fn"nvn ld"t4All30 1QB_-_. Y: _— — Sit.Avu. Corrhler 9 6 du'd.e 54 1r=p SIR 5t11 AY, Gorrldur 19 6 du'J¢ 114 ' 131.^^mi Ln-Aio 17 10.0m 7,500 no • I '; Ireuxny noervntlo° it 132`nueh (9j,' 0 d. rentBy 6 6 dn'.he 36 . at } 133 •. his n.n xr 44.rt Cnntur UO,NO • t I 134.l„rk 6Do (Prgm,ne"I u Xrvlmn frnter " f 1Ga CmWinl.-111 orR011° _ -9 —__ £43 — _^ �I�• 19e_Cn•.tnvgyY._vrrtnl 11 16.N0 1S0 _— Vmewly Remit vnt Illn 1GD %na n) 111.1 vs.. 16 6 du'./.e 108 I I tlpUUl' It-�'I-N�I'[IAL Qfclii'Fxb1. �4B1, • R , QD1:Pc1L?:gl.crnvuy 49 % QDQ1._Ole%0 Cr�rR po e_Lh 15 S.NO 133 • QO3£tLoteeo rl...VI lD 120,000 1D41L"tnetnur Awn u 9 160,000 ' GROUP 1 N TIAL Tcnldxcy a-t " . 301Tom_Lura. 9 173.00D 02 J,op.r Mr 4rc1 ut 1 — 60.000 15.000 I , � I f F 47 470,-0N • I. '9D3 L•9.0 r o trot eeu y North lord 4 40,NOTT I V ' GO4.91s.4 .r �t • ,L I� • • ' i;t� TO: Planning Commission - 2 "COMPARATIVE DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE FOR UNDEVELOPED PROPERTIES" -West of Dover/Coast Highway Bridge- EXHIBIT 2B Comm. Office Res . Sq . Sq . Comments Description Acres DU' s Ft. Ft. Development Timing/Occupancy 138 Banning Residential 150 900 Construction Initiated Prior to 1980 139 Caltrans (N. Coast 17.26 255 Construction Initiated Highway, West Prior to 1980 Superior) 140 Caltrans (N. Coast 22 . 86 274 Construction Initiated Highway, East Prior to 1980 Superior) 205 Res . S. F. (North 21 . 31 126 Construction Subsequent ext. of 16th to 1980 Street) 206 Res . M. F . (South 31 .43 465 Construction Subsequent Ext. of 16th St. ) to 1980 207 Caltrans (S. Coast 5 .15 R-2 Construction Subsequent to Highway, P . E, 1980 R-O-W) 305 Small -Craft 292 1926 Unk. Unk. Oil Least Expires in 1994. Harbor Possible development prior with agreement lease. TO: Planning Commission - 3 "TOTAL PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT - ALL SITES"1 Residential 6 ,928 Dwelling Units2 Commercial Office 2 ,858, 300 Sq . Ft. Commercial Retail 193,000 Sq . Ft. 3 Restaurant 103, 500 Sq . Ft.4 Hotel 575 Rooms Industrial 1 ,537 ,000 Sq . Ft. 1Does not include Commercial /Office/Restaurant in conjunction with West Newport Harbor . 2Does not include Caltrans R-O-W South Coast Highway, West Newpore area . 3Does not include "Mouth of Big Canyon" site . 4Does not include restaurants in Koll Center. 50oes not include hotel in Emkay. Section II This section of the staff report attempts to indicate the projected timing of improvements to the adopted Newport Beach circulation system. The timing of improvements to the circulation system has been organized into the same (short range - present to 198"0 , mid-range 1981 -85 , and long-range 1985-95) time frames as was the information in Section I of this report. Exhibit 3 gives the location and the projected timing of improvements for both public projects and development related projects . Exhibit 4 describes each projected improvement and indicates in greater detail their projected timing. EXHIBIT 3 Arterial Highway �Tr-, - Improvement Schedule 4 -`•,n+t``` C!' lf�\ 'ia �.+L A!`yO�sy ir. 1 '� �p •d `'�,,,, nremm,nr — y 1977 1980 i= elf .,-•r �i`�-r f --_ _ G •,� ,- mmmm •_ -, ,...- 1980- 1985 1985-1995 SMIMIM r � ' �' ` �`- Under construction c` _ _ '> a �°-� ' ' by 12-/77 kwt 29 p �ces ��.F�. ;�- ..r• +` r• �'!,.-. ."`-ram' �w- City Of NEWPORT CH -.- _,-s_ _ 5 � �,.� 'Qi i rri Cfi j'..i,-=�/...9:r. 'r . u.f-! ^" -! �±`.'_i.rJJ�7in3(•-J��'�t,.�� �-s` EA I- - � ... ^r*1�1,,.iu.�-� _._-i--�f, '� �- it •. . tlryr '1�G�3•{�',� a"�-, ,,1.-} TI ' sF �*_-a'F*"�n?'��"�..�� _ _ �- 00 00 Ilrr+ T . , /.•/ ••ryp` �'A '1 -=.�'����� J ! ' _�• 0 24 48 �s"Iek: rr s ' r- � fy n f ,� PAC 1 F t C OCEAN a' l lu; �� ��-�1' feet IL'(\�\J ADVANCE PLANNINO 01VISION 99 B •77 s �� Ii I ' C �_z P'1..I6�f.. ..:F.:•d�� ,,narHl, ynt * EXHIBIT kFC SoCWeon-oontlquout W$Pacific d v.lcp RU (local media SyrovnrnW 71 I..al/non-non-ensign.to dwalo-nt Ieplanont.u.Juheil. Ue.ai I.rorecent Pro$at Cate arm I 1.Mntat o so % 7 1977 1. mrond del per)'.my Regional Celttan. (oro r can teuct frontage road project 1. JAW...M uldoing Reg1..1 Clty/AIPP fund r on. eruct onl %..tblufl to MacArthur wleh bridge widening at am of".reset 1. 9,011.9 wldolnV local/.. City furor con teuot.) ' Industrial W Co.M 1977re 80 A", a .. JNuur.. Rd widening I.QW.On CIp (a..island) (Co ltted Afap.�r Ali F.land frontsge ' 5. PM widening mouth aid. Regional Caltrans/City (e ares } •r'f{ 54!If it• to t.t.An.Alvan i 1. intAtthur S1Po-CaryW l.al/ron city of./OilyaMp ( it had r' Inairtegll.1ePtgva-nts CItY of irvine/CFP �i {a�'f;• A. FI.A[thur tied-road M MgL.R.l Glt..VatY/mp/ c field F4I•n lnteructloo LAproveMnt. to ' %. Juvox.e M widening forsworn "Pita Irpmen.ot , t rest aid.read M U lion Polity IPerd•Re[onutl '" gun JU '..M g Be.Joaquin lecWnon City A y free eight turn 10. Risen widanlng $Such aid. Soul/con CID (Fred-mer..t) Jsxatr..to c.;,L.A u 11. DM widening-Reyeide U Regional aIt.../y" Dever a Lildgs♦.ova[- r Rhl' YCM to W.If Draw. f.l 11, PCII JJoint,.,- lne.rl. Wgfanai Icaituna/<itY/CIP . 'r lnoraectlan ieprwe»the j 14. Tarboro M widening-Rena Souflow CIP (North Ford) (does ttxd) aid.&Leon to F..a lulf 16. 41.Miguel 0r. -Mouth. I.Pal/c. CIY/MP Ifvy X.- i to Len Joaquin South) fe 17. ford M widening-north 1Suo1/ron CIP (H.rWc Pldg.) to.toad) aid.MacArthur to San Miqu 1 ICity of Irving 19. Av6116o at...In.-wait loci/can Me (corpora[.Plate) ( MO I aids Faullen to PCH r A. Wver ft. widening at loe.1/con CIP '••+•{ Caiuvay. franups •i" 1 00. ran Miguel Or.- MacArthur Soc.I/non CIP/MVP (OCPD - to Avocado conical! 21. Slron extension to local/con CIP/AMP/Calttan. ' IWAIthue %] Jaalcom Ad wldminq loaLL/con CIP (AawPrIt.t North) HewPOit.t IM to a.Ja.qul r . 1980-85 3a. PCM widuning- 54th At. A.Viunal celero./aure ` S W Repo.-soon aids f ; S1. Swan,At.-PCH to local/ron city/CIP/AMID j /5. Janboeea vLd.nio,meth 1.W.n CIP IReyvfaw I-Al") g of PCII ' a. pcx Wd..ing-mouth. Reglon.l Caltz.orm to LayaLde including I r JesRoxs.1ntvNttWn irprovensnai if. M1LAethur/Awcedo muPlst Regional Caltran./CIP/NVY/PAl z So Jeequin Hills M to PC 1 ]%. dmthiuf[ McArthur CI local/a. p/NtFP/Calt[enm { Janboxee to MaeArnue 1. •� 30. man J..q.Lft Mile M I¢Hold Regional CIP/AP z ` aPYglai.to CWP.r II. Newpeer Blvd- MN to Regional Caltr-a/City/CIp 3"St. (inv. Atchai) r 12. Yuri M retold. Regional Ax14pAV 1CStY of Y y Ban Miguel to%units CYA f' 14. Y.eA[nur BSW widening Regional CslrVSoa/MFD/rAV x ford M to&onita Copan I' I 19. con.,i4b..y i p Arches to UAW.Avom Regional C.1lten./rou 4 .i 36. rut Highway At Wwpurt larch..) Regional Caltrans/PAD Inhrehtgg. 1985-95 fun is, Corona del Hat Ptesvay FNlana role... (City/county Now a MI MINES t een.nvet Aadhil]to priority lisp Jaabnu. 1/. univ.uity Aeartsnalon Regional City/WY x Irvine to JarWr.. '• 35. JaI1loeet M widening M Regional filer/AN19 wait.lda nerddto 4aebl0! , 16, MacArthur Slvd widening Regional Caltran./ANYP/PAD x I M +t$ San Jo.quin to ford M I 11. coast Highway Regional Caltrox/FAu 1 V.v.r to the Amha. I N. Oarvn.cal Hat NY..net. Regional Caltrans IClty/County z ! =.. to Wit.Cy.M PYWIty list) 1 I 10. BAn Joaquin T.S..P.Wlxldo Mglon.l Count, x I 11g,W nt on at at /) 1, ' Unite to CulVar Drive and LaYand!O POYCa 5 H } ' A. 8. TO: Planning Commission - 4 Discussion It is the intent of staff in subsequent reports to the Planning Commission to provide information on project ultimate growth and development timing for the older established commercial and residential portions of the planning area . Further, staff will be further quantifying existing data to allow for comparisons of intensity/density and total occupied space at various timeframes ( i .e. , total structure space commercial office in 1980, 1985 and 1995 ) . This information will allow the Planning Commission to make comparisons in terms of possible imbalance between proposed development and support systems . In subsequent reports , staff intends to provide answers to those additional questions and issues raised at the November 3, 1977 Planning Commission Study Session (i .e. , traffic generation of various land uses , definitions of service levels , definitions of intersection deficiencies , etc. ) The next task identified (Tentative Work Schedule - Planning Commission Staff Report of November 3, 1977) will be the development of alternative plans for the undeveloped sites within the planning area . Staff will continue to develop data on the undeveloped sites within the planning area and to identify problems in terms of the support systems during the course of the General Plan review process . Public Participation It is the intent of staff to provide for public participation in the General Plan review process as appropriate . This could be accommodated through additional public hearings prior to the February, 1978 amendment session or through informal briefings with interested groups and individuals . The Planning Commission may wish to suggest additional direction for staff in this regard . Suggested Action Staff suggests that the Planning Commission review the information generated on the major undeveloped sites within the planning area , the timing of proposed improvements to the circulation system, and the memorandum from the Public Works Department on the City ' s most immediate and/or serious traffic capacity problems. Staff would further suggest that the Plannin Commission indicate any additional information they desire ?beyond that which we have indicated the Planning Commission will be receiving at subsequent hearings) and indicate a general direction for staff to take in the ,preparation of alternative plans for the undeveloped sites . Yours very truly, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 'R. V . Hogan, Dire r or 8y_,_ Fre alar co Senior Planner FT :jmb Attachments : 1 ) Memorandum from Public Works Department. 2 ) Map indicating key elements of circulation system. 3) Staff report from Public Works Department to City Council 11/14/77 "Progress Report and Information on the Accuracy of the Transportation Model " . a, November 10, 1977 TO: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: KEY TRANSPORTATION ROUTES AND LINKS RELATED TO GENERAL PLAN REVIEW Listed below are key elements of the circulation system having a significant relationship to the current general plan re- view. Major elements are listed, together with particular links or intersections requiring special attention. Other key elements may be identified later as the traffic model and the general plan review progress further. 1 . Pacific Coast Highway, all . a. Balboa Boulevard-Superior intersection b. Riverside intersection c. Jamboree intersection 2. Balboa Boulevard, extension northerly of Coast Highway 3. Superior Avenue, Coast Highway to Hoag Road 4. University Drive, Irvine Avenue to MacArthur Boulevard 5. Second Bay Crossing, as recommended in Alan M Voorhees study 6. Corona del Mar Freeway-Bristol Street frontage roads 7. San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor 8. Jamboree Road, Coast Highway to Eastbluff Drive North a. Jamboree-San Joaquin Hills Road intersection 9. MacArthur Boulevard-San Joaquin Hills Road-San Miguel Drive-Avocado Avenue intersection complex E I RRECEIViU � Cmumumty Develupmnnl „� Benjamin B. Nolan Depl. City Engineer £� Nov 1 Ultf� 1 BBN:jd NEW cay FCRi BEACH, "Z CALIF. /p fU \_ n� KEY ROUTES LINKS v / !' '��is�• \ ^'� +;"s•' .�•t+• —�- ' . l'�11i. a` -P''_ji IL Z "�!1 0. ✓''�r��i. V'� ;� � � -_ (let. ' _�=�°` --'.-.. ^ . '��. d � -�?y � if ? •e/ o qIb E.fs+�A'•♦ � _ .4�^7�e-:!� tt 1�,. -�:.' Y�aix®_`:+�'�' i tit l� <�� �,�,_F�Sa �r'"1.��'�S 1� •�z�1(f��--. + 8 a 9 _w .'���\ti•,e _ C''� �� \ •��a�.-_��I� �_ .•�:. �>> �"�) o +2 `�,• •"�'tr>ed ter. J• ..�+♦ '�►, .. • 1 k.a= �i3: �,,,,�' 3! j = —... �,�'`t�o'1.�4'�Jt2?JJn t:6�.4.��y�\;,!'?� " ���7C .... .t.♦��yv.�p !�,�a;,,�`xr.✓ V'`y of NEWPORT BEACH __---.:=R_ r_ i — -~ 1a $ `.r 0'7 � 1111111�VIT�� e ..;.o{�..._7,,. �SF�;s•-�.+ -'tir �A gnJ.,lluil;', t .t '•ram� � i'; (�rl �� � /yip ' y- ..«-a v., a r ,�.,ey,..._.__ �� .� �., M "�'!--••I(Il�ii t:t:::,:i:,a'tt'+ltr rej',µsLT1n.�ll♦Yt'-�: ' - •a�ir.yt,...��''--.�n.1 „ _.'-�_ - _ _ - 'i -z^<r.• p 24004800 ale S feet PACIFIC OCEAN -- AOVANGE �LANNINO tllVlitON 77.70•77 - 0 i q\/ Commnnr� November 14, 1977 ' 7y Deve:e Y DnPrnen= ( it STUDY SESSION AGENDA l NOV j 01977b� _ ITEM NO. 10 EWP ITY OF N d\ OR7 BEACH, 2 CALIF. i TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: PROGRESS REPORT AND INFORMATION ON THE ACCURACY OF THE TRANSPORTATION MODEL CONCLUSIONS: 1 . An origin and destination survey is not necessary to assure accuracy'of the Model . 2. The Transportation Model can be updated at anytime additional transportation data is available. 3. A letter should be sent to the Orange County Environmental Management Agency in support of the County's proposed vehicle license plate survey for the coastal area. 4. The 1978-79 budget should include funds for maintaining, operating and updating the Transportation Model. DISCUSSION: The City Council on October 11 , 1977 requested the staff to provi'de information on the accuracy of the "Transportation Model" and the need and desirability to conduct origin and destination surveys as input for the Model . The staff requested Herman Basmaciyan and Associates, the City's consultant, to summarize.the procedures used in developing the Transportation Model with specific emphasis on the accuracy of the Model and the need to conduct origin and destination surveys. Attached is a copy of the consultant's report. The staff has reviewed the report and concur with the consultant's conclusions and recommendations contained on Pages 8 and 9. The consultant will be present at the Council meeting to review his report and answer any questions the Council may have. The staff concurs with the consultant that the "Existing Conditions Model" validation procedures adequately duplicates existing travel patterns, eliminating the need to conduct origin and destination surveys. An origin and destination survey sampling five percent of the households in Newport Beach would cost approximately $50,000 and take approximately ten months to complete. This type of survey would only provide transportation data for Newport Beach residents and would not provide adequate data on regional and through trips. Iz Study Session Agenda Item No. 10 -2- November 14, 1977 The procedures used to develop the Transportation Model will allow the City to modify and update the "Existing Conditions" and "Future Conditions" Models When new data becomes available. Currently, the Orange County Environ- mental Management Agency proposes to conduct a vehicle license plate survey for the Coastal area between the Santa Ana River and Dana Point. The EMA staff estimates they will ask the Board of Supervisors in the next month or so to approve the project and authorize the submittal of consultant proposals. Summer and winter data from this project should be available in October, 1978 and could be used in further validating and or updating the City's Transportation Models. Bill E. Darnell Traffic Engineer Attachment BED:bcd 13 Herman Consulting Services Engineering/Planning Basmadyan Transportation Transit and Associates Traffic 1821 Port Renwick, Newport Beach, California 92660 (714) 640.5737 November 8, 1977 Mr. Bill E. Darnell, Traffic Engineer City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 Subject : The "Existing Conditions" Model Procedures and Validation Dear Bill : In accordance with our discussions on this subject, enclosed is a report which summarizes the procedures used in the development of the "Existing Conditions" traffic circulation model, describes the validation (or calibration) procedures, and assesses the need or desirability to conduct Origin and Destination Surveys. It is concluded that: - The "Existing Conditions" model duplicates current traffic patterns adequately; therefore, origin and destination (0-D) surveys are not required to assure model accuracy. - Comprehensive "at-home" type 0-D surveys are costly and time consuming. In the future special purpose 0-D surveys at major travel generators or vehicle license plate surveys to describe major travel patterns may be used to refine and up- date the model and would be more cost effective than compre- hensive areawide "at-home" 0-D surveys. - The Orange County Environmental Management Agency (EMA) is considering conducting vehicle license plate surveys along portions of the Orange County coast between Newport Beach and Mr. Bill E. Darnell -2- November 8, 1977 Dana Point. The City of Newport Beach should cooperate with the EMA to ensure that such a vehicle license plate survey is conducted as soon as possible and that the results are made available to the city to be used in model refinement and up- dating. Please call me if I can provide further details or answer any questions. Sincerely, HERMAN BASMACIYAN AND ASSOCIATES Herman Basmaciyan, P. EE HB.b Enc. THE "EXISTING CONDITIONS" MODEL for NEWPORT BEACH AND SURROUNDING AREA PROCEDURES AND VALIDATION November, 1977 Submitted by: HERMAN BASMACIYAN, P.E. tG, CONTENTS Page GENERAL 1 MODELLING PROCEDURES AND DATA SOURCES 2 Land Use and Socio-Economic Information 2 Network Data 2 Trip Generation Data 3 Trip Distribution (Origin- Destination Patterns) 3 SUMMARY OF VALIDATION PROCEDURE 4 ORIGIN AND DESTINATION SURVEYS 5 Types of 0-D Surveys 5 Types of Information Collected 6 Time Required for 0-D Surveys 8 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8 THE "EXISTING CONDITIONS" MODEL PROCEDURES AND VALIDATION GENERAL The question has been raised as to the need and desirability to conduct origin and destination surveys in conjunction with the City's traffic circulation model development effort. The following discussion examines many inter-related facets of this issue in order to present all necessary facts and considerations for decision-making. A. The City of Newport Beach is part of a vast Region and travel to and from and through the City constitutes a large portion of the total traffic volume on the City's major road and street facilities. Therefore, an origin and destination survey must be structured such that all components of traffic can be assess- ed. B. The fact that the City of Newport Beach is part of a vast Region enables it to take advantage of the planning resources and data information developed at the County and Regional levels. C. Origin-and-Destination (0-D) surveys are generally conducted for either of the following two purposes: 1. To develop data for a specific component of the total trip- making in an area. Such O-D surveys are useful in applica- tions such as corridor planning, specific facility planning, and comparable circumstances. 2. To develop travel pattern data on a comprehensive areawide basis. Such 0-D surveys are generally used as the basis for travel modelling and calibration. In general 0-D surveys conducted for purpose "1" are smaller scale efforts than those for purpose "2". Generally, regional or areawide planning agencies conduct comprehensive areawide O-D surveys while transportation improvement implementation agencies are primarily interested in specific travel components and conduct special purpose 0-D surveys, as appropriate, to assist in specific facility planning. D. In any modelling effort it is important to develop a good data base and to ensure that the model is "calibrated" or "validated" -2- 1$. to duplicate existing conditions with reasonable accuracy. It is equally important to understand that, in any modelling effort, when relationships developed on the basis of observed conditions are applied to assess or to predict potential future behavior, a major assumption must be made that the observed relationship between independent and dependent variables remain constant over time. (For example, if a household with certain characteristics --such as size, income, dwelling unit type, number of autos owned, etc. -- generates 12 vehicular trips per day now, a house- hold with the same characteristics will generate the same number of trips per day ten or twenty years from now.) This assumption of stability in relationships over time is inherent in every step of the travel model including trip generation, trip distribution, model split, and trip assignment. MODELLING PROCEDURES AND DATA SOURCES The "Existing Conditions" model for the City of Newport Beach (in- cluding a large surrounding area) is based on the following data sources: A. Land Use and SOcio-Economic Information 1. Existing land use estimated for each Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) by: a. CDD for Newport Beach b. CDD for Costa Mesa c. Consultants for portions of Irvine based on data supplied by Irvine. d. Consultants for portions of Santa Ana based on data supplied by Santa Ana. e. LARTS estimates for areas outside "Primary" Study Area 2. Household characteristics based on 1976 special census data at various levels of aggregation. B. Network Data 1. Link Distances - Actual measurements on appropriate scale maps. 2. Speeds - Field measurements by Newport Beach and Costa Mesa using a "floating car" technique and from speed limit data. -3- 3. Number of Lanes - Actual conditions (exclusive left-turn through and exclusive right-turn lanes) determined from records or field observations if necessary. 4. Facility classification - from records. C. Trip Generation Data 1. Actual field measurements for the following: a. In Newport Beach - Park Newport Apartments - Baywood Apartments - Promontory Point - Coves - Eastbluff - Harbor View Homes - Big Canyon - Jasmine Creek - Hoag Hospital - Newport Center Medical Complex (Avocado) - Placentia Medical Complex - Newporter Inn - Several Restaurants - Lido Island - Fashion Island b. In Costa Mesa - Orange Coast College - FEDCO - South Coast Plaza Shopping Center c. Other - Orange County Airport 2. Where field data was not available, trip generation rates from observations elsewhere were used. D. Trip Distribution (Origin-Destination Patterns) The trip distribution procedure combines LARTS regional travel pattern information and local tripmaking in the Study Area. Thus it permits the focusing of intense attention upon the Study Area while the external influences are also reflected. zA. -4- 1. Summary of LARTS Trip Distribution Procedure: a. On basis of 1967 0-D Survey data, develop models for 1967 conditions. b. Validate that models indeed duplicate 1967 actual ground count conditions. c. Use models to "predict" mid-1970's conditions d. Validate that the model "predictions" match actual ground count conditions, 2. Summary of Newport Beach Model Procedures: a. Establish cordon around Newport Beach/Costa Mesa Study Area and identify cordon crossings. b. Identify LARTS Zones within Area c. Obtain following information from LARTS: - Internal Trips (between each pair of internal LARTS Zones) - Internal/External Trips (to/from each internal zone to/from each cordon crossing) - Through Trips (between each pair of cordon crossings) - Total cordon crossings d. Verify that total cordon crossings match actual ground counts. e. Discard internal trips f. Use Gravity Model Formula to estimate internal/external trips on basis of TAZs. g. Expand Internal/External trips using estimated total trip ends. h. Add in "through" trips. SUMMARY OF VALIDATION PROCEDURE Major validation points are: A. 1967 LARTS model output vs. 1967 ground counts - regional checks by LARTS. B. Mid-1970's LARTS model output vs , ground counts - regional checks by LARTS. C. "Existing Model" Cordon crossings vs. present ground counts - along entire cordon. ,D. After completion of "Existing Model, " comparisons of model out- put vs. ground counts along selected screenlines and on major facilities in the internal area (Data to be presented.) -5- Based on a review of the various validation steps, especially step D which pertains specifically to the Study Area, it is concluded that the "Existing Conditions" model is capable of duplicating exist- ing travel patterns satisfactorily. ORIGIN AND DESTINATION SURVEYS While it does not appear that 0-D surveys are necessary for model development, for purposes of information a general overview of 0-D survey techniques is presented below: A. Types of 0-D Surveys 1. At the home - Documents all tripmaking by an entire house- hold in one day. a. Personal interview - app. $40-$50 per interview b. Telephone interview - app. $20-$30 per interview C. *Questionnaire - app. $10 per returned questionnaire * Not a recommended procedure - bias in returns During 1976 LARTS conducted a very small sample "at-home" survey to update the 1967 0-D survey. When the results of this small sample survey are available, the City can investigate the possibilities of using the information in updating or refining the "Existing Conditions" model. It should be recognized that a small sample survey must be evaluated thoroughly and utmost care must be used in its application. 2. At the roadside - Documents the specific single trip of an individual vehicle. a. Personal interview b. *Questionnaire c. Color-coded card d. License plate recording at specified crossings. The Orange County Environmental Management Agency (EMA) is considering such a survey for the Coastal Area of Orange County between the Santa Ana River and Dana Point. e. *Photo followed by license plate check. * Not recommended procedures. ti zz, -6- Cost is variable depending on traffic volume, control problems, hours of operation, specific methodology, etc. 3. Users of Specific Travel Generators - Documents the specific single trip of a person or vehicle going to/from the generator. a. Personal interview b. Questionnaire c. License plate checks (matched against DMV records) Examples: Airports, major parks, major employment centers, beaches, shopping centers , ferry crossings. Cost is variable depending on traffic volume, control problems, hours of operation, specific methodology, etc. 4. Truck/Taxi Surveys Conducted usually by analyzing the trip records of each vehicle, or by requesting that the driver make a complete report of all trips on a given day. B. Types of Information Collected: 1. At - home surveys a. Household Characteristics - Number of persons - Ages - Licensed Drivers Type of Residence - Number of Autos - Employment Status of Residents - Other b. Tripmaking Characteristics For each trip by each members of tte household: - Origin of trip (at home or other specific address) - Destination of trip (home or other specific address) - Time of trip - Mode of travel (auto, bus, etc.) - Purpose of trip - Other 23. -7- c. Other information as desired - Attitudinal questions - Opinions 2. At the Roadside a. Vehicle Characteristics - Classification: auto, truck, etc. (by observation) - State of registration - Where vehicle is garaged - Number of occupants (by observation) b. Trip Characteristics - Origin of trip J by specific address or - Destination of trip recognizable location - Time of trip (by observation) - Purpose of trip c. Other - Attitudinal questions At the Roadside (License Plate or Color-Coded Cards) a. State of Registration (License Plate only) b. Crossing Point - both crossings c. Time of trip 3. Users of Specific Travel Generators Varies based on the type of survey and the type of travel generator. 4. Truck/Taxi Surveys a. Vehicle Characteristics - Place where vehicle is garaged - Size, number of axles, weight capacity (trucks only) - Other b. Trip Characteristics - For each trip: - Origin of trip - Destination of trip - Time of trip - Purpose of trip - Number of persons transported (taxi only) - Type and amount of goods carried (trucks only) - Other 2q -8- C. Time Required for 0-D Surveys Many steps are inherent in conducting 0-D surveys : 1. Design of Procedures a. Sample selection b. Documentation of specific methodology c. Design of forma or questionnaires d. quality control procedures 2. Training of personnel 3. Field testing procedures 4. Modification/refinement of procedures 5. Field Work 6. Coding of returns 7. Factoring or the expansion of the sample 8. Analysis of results The time required to complete a comprehensive "At Home" type 0-D survey is a minimum of six months. Depending on the area of coverage and the complexity of the survey, the time required may be as long as ten months to a year. Other types of less complex surveys such as those at special travel generators can be completed in a shorter time period. Simple 0-D surveys can be accomplished in four to six weeks assuming that all necessary manpower and resources are concen- trated to accomplish the task. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION The validation procedure for the "Existing Conditions" model is quite rigorous, and the model is considered satisfactory in describing existing travel patterns. The ability exists to update the model as additional data is developed at the regional or county level or at the Specific Travel Generator level. 25, -9- To be of any value at "At Home" type Origin and Destination (0-D) survey must encompass not only Newport Beach but considerable surrounding area since the tripmaking of persons who reside out- side the City but travel into the City must also be ascertained. The magnitude of such an effort is immense. To sample 5.0 percent of the households in Newport Beach alone would cost approximately $50,000. At the roadside, the interview technique presents considerable operational and safety problems - queing, pulling in and out of traffic on congested roads, etc. The color-coded card technique has similar problems , but to a lesser extent. A vehicle license plate survey appears to be best suited for determining major travel patterns and constitutes a cost- effective way of obtaining considerable information due to the geographic characteristics of Newport Beach and the patterns of roads and streets. Since the Orange County Environmental Management Agency (EMA) is considering a vehicle license plate survey in the Coastal Area between the Santa Ana River and Dana Point, the City of Newport Beach should cooperate with the EMA to ensure that the survey is conducted as early as possible. Surveys of Users of Specific Travel Generators are considered valuable additional information items to further refine and supplement the model. Information from such future surveys can be used in the model updating process. 0-D Surveys are time-consuming efforts. A comprehensive "At- Home" 0-D survey would require a minimum of six months, perhaps up to a year, to complete. Less complex surveys can be completed within four to six weeks. rt • Planning Commission Meeting 'November '17, 1977 Study Session Agenda No . CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH November 9 , 1977 TO : Planning Commission FROM: Department of Community Development SUBJECT: General Plan Review - Status Report At the Planning Commission Study Session on November 3 , 1977, the Planning Commission reviewed the City Council ' s direction on the overall General Plan review. Additionally , each Planning Commissioner indicated specific areas of concern that he/she wanted addressed during the General Plan review process . The purpose of this staff report is to bring the Planning Commission up to date on the information staff has received from property owners of the major undeveloped sites within the Newport Beach planning area - and information on the 'timing of circulation system improvements . Section I of this report will identify the major undeveloped parcels . This section will further indicate : 1 ) the use(s ) contemplated for each site ; 2) the intensity of each development -proposal ; and 3) the estimated occupancy of each site . Section II of this report will indicate the projected timing of improve- ments leading to the completion of the adopted Newport Beach circulation system. Finally, attached to this report is a copy of a memorandum from the Public Works Department indicating the major intersections and roadway links that appear to be the most immediate and/or serious traffic capacity problems . This staff report , the memorandum from Public Works Department, and Planning Commission discussion at the- study session will be organized with additional data to attempt to identify problem areas in terms of possible imbalance between proposed development and support systems . Section I During the past several weeks , staff has been meeting with property , owners of the major undeveloped sites in an attempt to develop an overall development schedule for vacant sites within the Newport Beach planning area . The sites investigated are indicated on Exhibit 1 . The proposed type , quantity, and detailed occupancy of each site west of the Dover/ Coast Highway Bridge is 'shown on Exhibit 2A. The projected type , quantity and estimates of occupancy for projects west of the Dover/ Coast Highway Bridge is. shown on Exhibit 2B . 107 -- EXHIBIT 1 110 105 \ 113 r 112 104 103 113 101 �14 111 10 Schedule 30. `303 1 4: t 120 « r% 126 ya7 E€ 115 116 119 201 - �- •� ,722 125 � -,...>' y , , � % ram r� � 1 . i �jv �•s,., ` 51 204 •^'.o✓i n-"� �i` p( � ' d _ _-203 r� : I { q - 138r 205 7 0t }��rIJ 136'L r I`RJR 71, city 305 a 206 7 t' Qtr�n tia �o 139140 G{ �; r47 mow( r•'� 121 u '* 0�'�0 n �EWP® - —_— ', • ,� "".,`y rya,-.•It llijl7 11[y ty. ...qi Hp.%. .i,;t , I.,+t 4y�.�Up40 �Ol - BEACH z- ! rw a y tlll Ry • _ �It 4 " Y J.. rl�t.ritr..t Lpt \. a s- cgmt t^- = "� ✓ `' -- 207 %�z , % ' •-"� �7�®ucJ "� 2400IL fl-W 4800 $cater fIn eet PACT F I C OCEAN ADVANCE PLANNING DIVIB ION 11 • 8 • 77 ' EXHIBIT 2A t L COHPARATIV VELOPHFNT SCHEDULE.FOR UNDEVELOPED PROPERTIES • "EAST IWO OVER/ HWY. BRIDGE" DFVFIOP4°vT FAVCFL ACRES 0. P. RESIDENTIAL COH4ERCIA1 COHMERCIAL RESTADRAST HOTEL I60USTRIAL 77 78 79 BD 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 BB 89 DENSITI68 D.U'S OFFICE RETAIL SQ. Fi. RONIE SQ. IT. sQ• FT. CeOUr [- 17 - aunmNn t971-1919fl0 BULL CI'NTER ' 101 5aetl M. bldg. 125 000 " Corporate order. " 102 build to °ulU 175,000 103 C^r'er.ea.rner lack._ 22,500 " 104 Cornornte orftec bids. 22,500 105 Pau, food ee.eouronc x " 106 D '_rnaeaurone T x " 107 xm1mmnnt alto - 108 °raev aFfleo bid . 175,000 moss 109 10.tort/offlcv b1d, 172,00D t 11O_5'L^rate ofF tee Q 100,000 111 elocet .lee 1.1. °^'"+'os o ' MEAT VEY. 112 InJootcl.l Dev. ] 32,000 110 Note1 3 83,000 x °t 114 Offlco do, 17 395.000 AERONUTRONTC FORD 115 Realdentlal de.. ISO 5.5 du'a/ac 550 116 Roe..reh and do, IRVINE CO4PANY Freevay re+rrvn,ton A dit 117 m•.L n) C.ond�e 2o, con. 90 113 Nry nre Vl lln eu 14 60,O00 60.000 " Freevay to...v.,lon east n) nu ICI44nlly 8 100 " ° 119-a_.u°d_ North Ford 70 675,000 * t 120.) lndu.tr/m 121 Rnvalde sgmrc 1.7 36.300 122 Clvle Pl.-. 26 320,000 " t 9 6 do../.e 54 ^ O0 123�I nrLnr alit — 8cvyurl Cvuter ID 350,000 t 124_xlork xun vac. Hoe. _ all Couyoa Area 10 is 160 " 125 cn tam Ioty 126 G'°a.tbay. SB 6 du'a/nc 348 " 127 Nwimr[ee NUah _ 08 8 du'a/.t 704 " 40 8 du'./ac 320 " 128 [a_vn ya_e4tdentfn3 __ — Sch A,.. Corridor y 6 du'a/.c 54 ^ t 129 b. SFR S,h Ave. Corridor 19 G du'./ac 114 " t 13O__D, __ 131 Aivatcv L ndln 17 1 10,000 1 7.500 200 " fesevaY naecvat ion " 132 "^u[L R. ern Carden. 12 Sth Ave. Currldur 133 • Iav6 Arm NI 6 6 dn'v/ac 36 oC N.,.It Crnt.r . 134 D1°rk_600 (Pnmrnt1o1) 11 450,000 " ° Nrurnrt Primer 13S_Cmdnu. el rck 800 _9 245 t 136 Ldu Tv_r1- •, .t,i.I 25 16,000 250 I".e..iY 137 E'$1 n) H.ebnr Vl.v 26 8 du'vlac 208 ° 01ICLP It - INITIAL ULI.UINtiII l9tl t-19U3 201 alleutli' Bl Can ° 49 x 202 S_n b'ee.croak North 13 5.000 125 " , 20352rL tt Plaza Y.at 10 120.000 " 2O4nSAc5hu11"---do 9 160,000 " CROUP III - INITIAL eCCle•AtiCY 19RI984-1986 301 PCH/J.wfiucae 19 175.000 302 JnnLocee/MncAreliur 2 60,000 15,000 303 Sin eteP_°`Creek South 47 LI0.000 " North Ford 4 40,000 3O46__e++arel.t y TO : Planning Commission - 2 " COMPARATIVE DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE FOR UNDEVELOPED PROPERTIES" -West of Dover/Coast Highway' Bridge- EXHIBIT 2B Comm. Office Res . Sq . Sq . Comments Description Acres OU ' s Ft. Ft . Development Timing/Occupancy 138 Banning Residential 150 900 Construction Initiated Prior to 1980 139 Caltrans ( N . Coast 17 . 26 255 Construction Initiated Highway, West Prior to 1980 Superior) 140 Caltrans (N . Coast 22 . 86 274 Construction Initiated Highway, East Prior to 1980 Superior) 205 Res . S . F. ( North 21 . 31 126 Construction Subsequent ext . of 16th to 1980 Street) 206 Res . M. F . (South 31 .43 465 Construction Subseg6ent Ext. of 16th St. ) to 1980 207 Caltrans (S . Coast 5 . 15 R-2 Construction' Subsequent to Highway , P . E . • 1980 R-O-W) 305 Small -Craft 292 1926 Unk . Unk . Oil Least Expires in 1994 . Harbor Possible development prior with agreement lease. "TOTAL PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT - ALL SITES"1 Residential 6 ,928 Dwelling Units2 Commercial Office 2 ,858, 300 Sq . Ft. Commercial Retail 193,000 Sq . Ft. 3 Restaurant 103,500 Sq . Ft. 4 Hotel 575 Rooms Industrial 1 , 537,000 Sq : Ft. 1Does not include Commercial /Office/Restaurant in conjunction with West Newport Harbor. 2Does not include Caltrans R-O-W South Coast Highway, West Newport area . 3Does not include "Mouth of Big Canyon " site . 4Does not include restaurants in Koll Center. SDoes not include hotel in Emkay . • TO : Planning Commission - 3 This section of the staff report attempts to indicate the projected timing of improvements ' to the adopted Newport Beach circulation system. The timing of improvements to the circulation system has been organized into the same ( short range - present to 1980 , mid-range 1981 -85 , and long-range 1985-95) time frames as was the information in Section I of this report . Exhibit 3 gives the location and the projected timing of improvements for both public projects and development related projects . Exhibit 4 describes each projected improvement and indicates in greater detail their projected timing . EXHIBIT 3 Arterial Highway pvn Improvement ��i{Q '=� Q • �T - _ 2 ®4 ' Schedule 1977- 1980 '^,xe3 1965 1995 � �t' 17 Under construction GPA, U11 city y m +i✓ %Q y^Jf� (�ful �( ��\ K'Si4•� yE�{.�t r"' 80� 00�3'1 ©�vp�p OpAC1�� ' ? - - • _ -_ _ 23 3 f '-�',{ 37' o �,1+,�%l•t7� -� ;v�.�t���`i� ' ei9p� ®©appf7pL7d' c-��"1 �,� NEWPORT CH 4i�""aft��.. L 'l.sa.•��. ;'�Lf1.. r 'i i Ni gr;� 139 31 at i�ay. k6— SIM; „ 0 2400 4800 Scale ��a! , Y ooc� rl? In I � '' ooa ,w:-v -' �f�j Ti--)„2R�o�p0 ��- � feet PACIFIC_ _ OC_EAN---- { ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION 11 8 •77 FA ZZCTS EXHIBIT 4 e • local/con- contiguous to Ape<ifi< 1oPmenG (local onslte iopravaaeoc: 1o<a1/non-non-eontil..as to dew e co,lecantetign 5 . 1. Sara.Ianrevc-ent Prmfutt C.r.clrl n P[ 77 l 00 Al 01 .3 As 1977 1 1. Corona del Il.t kr2away Raq lonal Caltrans (untl r on truce ea) !tentage Fred project 2. JA-bore.PL vld-nin9 Po9tanal City/AHFP (ant tr wa tract on) Eaccbluff to pachathux with bridge widening at San Diego Crook 3. Superlgr widening local/non City (und r eon trout on) Industrial to Ds.AS 1977- 80 d. Jocwxae Rd widonin9 local/con CIP (Sea inland) (co..tttod See Island front,. S. Pot widening south aide Regional Caltanna/city (cow fitted 54th St. to Santa Ana River G. Ile<Arthut Stud-Carpus local/non Caltruno/City/County, (Co.. lttod) intersection it,rovenants City of Irvine/CIP J. McArthur Blvd-Ford Rd Regional Coltrane/Clay/CIp/ <0 Laced) intersection improvements a. 2arbora.Pat widening local/ton Capital Ioprovexent Cast aid* Ford Rtl to Bison Policy Mad-As xonor) 9. Jaricoree Ad B San Joaquin local/non City £tea right turn ID. III...widening- couch aide Ioca1/con CIP (Ford+h.aonutr) Jamaov.a to Camolbatk 11. pot widening-Dny.ide to Regional 'alit.../FAU Low (co... aced) Dover a bridge♦Dov¢- PCB to Cliff Dclva 12. PC:I 0 Jecroreo -lots iln Regional iCalta.Ds/City/cip , Intersection improvaaent 14. J.vtSor m"Wasting- one local/con CIP (North Ford) (co- tted) aide U.on to Eaetbluff 15. San 41gue1 Or. -Hju sthat local/con CIP/AMP (!wy nee to San Joagotn ouch) , 17. ,Pool W wldealrg-north ]Deal/non Cie (Harbor Ridge) Co..cud) aid.!:a.Arthur to Sen Yigu I (City of Irvinel 10. Avocado eztena30n-west local/con CIP (Corporat.Plat.) (C0m Cud) aide Farallon to Pot 19. Dover Dr, widening at local/con CIP Castaways frontage 20. San Miguel Dr.-Facarchur load/can CIP/NIFp (DC1D to Awt.a. t..Ln.1) 21. Besot extension to local/con CIP/ANFP/C.ltrans IacArthur 22 Jaoberea PA widening local/con CIP (Novportor North) Newport¢[ Im to San Janqut 1980-85 16. PCH widening- 54t2a St. Regional celtrana/AHFP to Petra. - south aids 23. Superior St:➢CH to local/own City/C2P/AIIFP Iteuart. _ 25. Jerboru vldtning north local/can CIP (Reyview taunting) law of PCH 26. PCN widening -MacArthur Regional Caltranc/FAU to Bay.ide Including Jscboreo in......clon - IPptovenmrtc ., 27. Ha<Arthur/Avocado couplet Aegi...I columns/CIP/ANST/FAU xI NOW San Joequln Hill.Ad to PC 28. Cntbluf£extension local/mn CIPIVAP/Colarono Jarboraa to Ya<Atthur 29. San Joaquin Hill. Road Regional CIP/,WP z Spyglass to Culver 31. Newport bled- Pod to Regional <altxans/city/CRP z 32nd St. Zinc. Arches) 32. Ford M extension Regional AHrP/FAU (City of x San Y.Sguel to Bonito Cyn 34. Y,A<.arthar Blvd widening pull.ona1 C.ItrAne/A4FP/FAU z Ford Pd to Smile,Canyon 39. Consr Highway Arches to Deluca Aeaaue Peglerel Caltrans/FAU 3S. Coast Highway At Newport (Arches) Aegtan.I Caltrans/FAU ma into[chto, 1985 -95 13. Corona del Her Fro<way Ro91ocn1 Caltrens (City/County x construct Anthill to priority llct) JarA.... 33. University Dr.oxtenslan Regional City/RCP xMEN Itvs.. to Jachars. 35. J.ulcor2t ad widening R.o.Ml City/AIf, Meat nine Ford t0 E4.tbluf IS. PacArthar Blvd wida.i, Raglonel' Caltrans/AHFP/FAU x San Joequln to Ford M 37. Coast Nighvay Regional Color.../FAU Cover to the Arch.. 24. corona dal yar Iwy c.net. R.,Io al Water. (City/County z Ja<•xroe to Boaitn CID Ad priority ]Lot) 3D. St.,Joqquin Trang.Cortid0 Peglot.l County x I I11Srv•let un ei se y) Aonita to Culver Drive and II r.,Md to Pont. 5 TO : Planning Commission - 4 Discussion It is the intent of staff in subsequent reports to the Planning Commission to provide information on project ultimate growth and development timing for the older established commercial and residential portions of the planning area . Further, staff will be further quantifying existing data to allow for comparisons of intensity/density and total occupied space at various timeframes . ( i .e „ total structure space commercial office in 1980 , 1985 and 1995 ) . This information will allow the Planning Commission to make •mare—meem+n-g+u+ comparisons in terms of possible imbalance between proposed development and support systems . In subsequent reports , staff intends to provide answers to those additional questions and issues raised at the November 3, 1977 Planning Commission Study Session ( i .e . , traffic generation of various land uses , definitions of service levels , definitions of intersection deficiencies , etc. ) The next task identified (Tentative Work Schedule - Planning Commission Staff Report of November 3, 1977) will be the development of alternative plans for the undeveloped sites within the planning area . Staff will continue to develop data on the undeveloped sites within the planning area and to identify problems in terms of the support systems during the course of the General Plan review process . Public - Part•icipation It is the intent of staff to provide for public participation in the General Plan review process . as appropriate . This could be accommodated through additiona14public hearings prior to th•e February , 1978 amendment session or through informal briefings with interested groups and i n d i v i duals . d*i-reet;-e-n—fo-r sira-�f � t'�: - :-e-ga-r-d•. Suggested Action Staff suggests that the Planning Commission review the information generated on the major undeveloped sites within the planning area , the timing of proposed improvements to the circulation system, and the memorandum from the Public Works Department on the City ' s most immediate and/or serious traffic capacity problems . Staff would further suggest that the Planning Commission indicate any additional e indicated the that which we have information they desire (beyond ,. 9 subsequent hearings ) and Commission will be receiving at ubse Planning q indicate a general direction for staff to take in the preparation of alternative plans for the undeveloped sites . Yours very truly , DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R. V . Hogan , Director By Fred Talarico Senior Planner FT : jmb Attachment: Memorandum from Public Works Department i0p•, Planning Commission Meeting November 11 , 1977 Study Session Agenda Item No . 1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH November 15 , 1977 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Department of Community Development SUBJECT: General Plan Review - Status Report "Additional Information" The purpose of this report is to provide the Planning Commission with additional information to assist the Commissioners with the review of the General Plan . The following exhibits have been attached to this report: Exhibit "A" : - A chart indicating proposed development totals for each timeframe ( i .e . , short-range 1977 to 1980; mid-range 1980 to 1985 , and long-range 1985 to 1995) . Exhibit "B" : - A chart indicating existing residential development densities . Exhibit "C" : - A chart indicating existing commercial areas intensity. Exhibit "D" : - A chart indicating each major vacant parcel , an identification number, total acres , General Plan designation site , zoning limitations , proposed development, and the intensity or density of development proposed . Exhibit "E" : - A map defining existing and proposed uses in the Newport Center area . Yours very truly, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R. V . Hogan , Director By _ � g� Fred ala ico Senior Planner FT: jmb Attachments: Exhibits "A" through "E" 2. EXHIBIT "A" Development Timing 1977 - 1980 Residential 1422 DU ' s Commercial Office 541 ,900 _Sq . Ft. Commercial Retail 95 ,000 Sq. Ft. Restaurant 12 ,000 Sq . Ft.1 Hotel Unk .2 Industrial 157,000 Sq. Ft. 1Figure does not include three restaurant sites in Koll Center (Nos . 104, 1'05 and 106) . 2Does hot show hotel site in Emkay Center (No. 113) to be developed in this timeframe with unknown number of rooms . 1980 - 1985 Residential 3,532 DU ' s Commercial Office 1 ,781 ,400 Sq . Ft. Commercial Retail 58,000 Sq. Ft.1 Restaurant 75,500 Sq . Ft. Hotel 550 Rooms Industrial 660,000 Sq. Ft. 1Figure does not include Commercial Retail development at "Mouth" of Big Canyon . 1985 - 1995 Residential 1 ,975 DU ' s Commercial Office 460,000 Sq. Ft. Commercial Retail 40,000 Sq . Ft.1 Restaurant 16,000 Sq. Ft.1 Hotel 25 Rooms Industrial 720,000 Sq . Ft. 1Figure does not include Commercial /Office/Restaurant in conjunction with West Newport Harbor. 3. TOTAL PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT "ALL SITES"1 Residential 6 ,928 DU ' s Commercial Office 2 , 743, 300 Sq . Ft. 1 Commercial Retail 193,000 Sq . Ft. 2 Restaurant 103,000 Sq . Ft. 3 Hotel 575 Rooms4 Industrial 1 ,537 ,000 Sq . Ft. 1Does not include Commercial /Office/Restaurant in conjunction with West Newport Harbor. Further, represents a change in office development from staff report of November 17, 1977 , due to revi.sed data . ?Does not include "Mouth" of Big Canyon site . 3Does not include restaurants in Koll Center. 4Does not include hotel in Emk&y. r EXHIBIT "B" • • s Traff it General Existing Zone Area Type Davelo ment Plan Acres DU's Densit 62 Eastbluff SFD L.D. 164 466 2.76 60 The Bluffs SFA M.O. 98.4 620 6.3 61 The Bluffs SFA M.D. 95.5 688 7.2 90 Harbor View SFD M.D. 232.78 1,043 4.48 93 Seawind SFD 6 Condo LD 6 MF 40-10.7 119 - 86 3 6 8 92 Spyglass SFD A A LD ISE 350 2.95 Hill 83 Harbor SFD 6 LD a 107 7.5 265 120 2.5 a View Apt. MF 16.1 Hills I 85 Harbor SFD LO 147 448 3.0 View Hills 11 04 Jasmine SFA MD 38.0 130 4.0 Creek -34 Corona SFD ' Apt. MD 2F 81.0 274 3.39 Highlands MF 35 Cameo SFD LO 44.3 141 3.18 Shores No. 36 Cameo SFD LD 77.6 176 2.27 Shores So, 37 Shorecliffs SFO rLD 50 141 2.8 32/33 Corona del SFD 6 DP 86 1,20D 14.0 Mar N. 29/30/31 Corona del SFD 6 OF 6 Apt 13D 1,816 14.0 Mar S. 28 Irvine SFD 143.6 488 3.4 Terrace 27 Bel. Isle SFD DP Tri 2 Family 113 2,195 19.42 26 Y Penn Pt. SFD/Apt./Tri/bP MD/MF 100 931 9.3 24/05 Con. gal. SFD/Apt./Tri/OP MD/MF/2F 70 1,215 18.0 38 Promontory Apt. MF 33.9 520 15.3 Point 39 Promontory SFA/SFD/Apt./ MD S MF B5 467 5.5 Day DP/Condo 39 Harbor Isle 39 Linda Isle 44 Dayshores SFD MD 46.8 257 6,3 22 Linda Isle SFD Apt. MD 8 MF 86 910 10.6 42 Cliff Haven SFD/Apt./DP LO/2F/MF 72 519 7.2 50/51 Mariners' SFD LD 2.53 1.087 4.3 54 Upper Hpt. SFD 6 Condo LD A MF 31.3 128 4.1 Day Est. 51 Newport Condo MF 38.0 460 12.1, Crest 1 Newport Condo rND40.0 281 7.0 Terrace 8 Newport SFD/DP/Tri 60 627 10.4 Shores 59 Park Apt. 48.48 1,305 26.85 Newport Oakwood Apt. 32.3 1.450 44.9 71/72 _ Big +SFD LD 180.9 488 2.7 Canyon 73 Big Condo MF 17.0 144 8.6 Canyon Type General Plan SFA " "Single-Family Attached" LO " "Low-Density" SPD " "Single-Family Detached" MD " "Medium-Density" APT " "Apartment" HD " "High-Density" Condo - "Condominium" 2F * "Two-Family" OF • Duplex MF " "Multi-Family" TRI " "Triplex" 5 EXHIBIT "C" Ex Sq, Existing Area Type of Development General Plan Sq. Ft. Ft. Int. Mariners Sq. Sales Retail S & S 81 ,000 36,200 .47 Commercial M.M. Comm. Off. Ret. S & S 18,900 4,468 .24 U.C.B. Commercial Design Comm. Off. Am/Prof/Fin. 487,872 150,000 .31 Plaza Commercial Gateway Comm. Offc. Am/Prof/Fin. 520,411 .3 165,000 .32 Plaza Commercial Eastbluff Retail Comm. Ret. S & S 310,147.2 31 ,250 .10 Commercial Harbor Retail Comm. Ret. S & S 277,477.2 61 ,396 .22 View Commercial Westcliff Retail Comm. Ret. S & S 439,956 124,150 .28 Plaza Commercial Newport Retail Comm. Ret. S & S 405,108 71 ,000 .18 Hills Commercial N.C. Fire Pub. Fac. Gov. ,/Ed. ,/ 64,904.4 13,481 .21 Station Inst. N.C. Pub. Fac. Gov.,/Ed. ,/ 108,900 48,000 .44 Police Station Inst. Shark Is. , Pvt. Clubs Rec. ,/Mar., 27,007.2 9,000 .33 Y.C. Commercial 1 . Union Bank Comm. Office Am./Prof. ,/ 296,900 - Fin. Comm. 2. Avco Comm. Office Am. ,/Prof. , 271 ,000 - Fin. Comm. 3. Wells Fargo Comm. Office Am. ,/Prof. , 303,535 - Fin. Comm. Total 1/2/3 - - 584039.6 871 ,435 1 .40 Pacific Comm. Office Am. ,/Prof. ,/ 435,164.4 311 ,325 .72 Mutual Fin. Comm. A. Broadway Retail Comm. Retail S & 173,814 S Comm. B. Buffums 56,000 C. J.C.Penneys 227,020 D. Robinson's 228,534 E. Mall Shops 204,159 F. Gr. West S & L 2,088 G. Coco's 5,274 H. Velvet Turtle 10,351 I. E1 Roberto 5,200 J. Bullock's Wil. 80,000 K. Neiman-Marcus 120,000 L. Mall Shops 45,000 Total A-L 3,267,000 1 ,157,440 .35 EXHIBIT I'D" mm" tail Nab]CO rotes Kum A n t A a_ F Irian I C ng a"t-initial pt M< 1NI•llp kill or,, of Will Offla SIN• 11.0 .Wn.C,olmf., P.C.Olnti for It60pp f1.f!. •tf 1,NI.OW So. IW GrnS1rnu 0ff1511 ].IG Aoln, Pn/.. IIO,OW N~f1.1 Gun.Off. .]] (b.It bolt Ft...tw. Plut 1.f Gnit 60'm So,ft, 101 144MMI oIM t fh1bf 12.10030. t, Mk, 104 iitrai Ofllu S.)t Gnrtl 1040try Sttion.OSf tt. to$ Fait tFind t 4ar11 mono, Va. IN N"'1 MStGrbt punt Indatly Mk. 107 MoIWmt site t.0 MoGII GIII ad pl. G"IG Cant. in GV no Office mull out Gl Cm.Off. .t� "I dt l Grnlb Goa. I]S,WO>q.St. 1N 10 su NINIj Offla 1t.b1 Anolf�rof.. toon.W fu.Pp 110 GrNno 1.0 Abu.,Prot., Conn.Off. .10 Ofuu I11d.[r. 1p,0y III Plot food S.20 fund on On W. Wk. fin,faw•. I1I.A1 O(Mb T 11t blatrol ] fool Anoboy P.C.Snot Plar Ino0rpl iS USrWwnt Ant O111n ]t.WO G•it. OI.WO sq.ft. 113 Wool ] Goo S oylG P.C.G w M1. o ltnit of So 4"M ll Modified lid Wood G 1134 Cnanrtltl 5.11 mull S SIMIM P C. Coror"M .W Gwuchl Gull SLOW$O.ft Ill Offlo 1L0 ALIn,Inf.. P.C. bannlu At pObtnnt Ft,.Conn. Offln ]95,a111k ft. _ GACIR11 alc lap - - 17f N11on11tl 10) 'pmltr llnl1. PA.Amorat W WY 5.5 pnlopnOl AC'MMnI Ind,• to Felt Mood W-I/ tied Gllontul 111 ilNni Gn d MM1 ol b So• O•W p1.pnlnnnt n M f CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE 7. vW dust CII11 1 Ig9p5[0 AOOJMFReN 01AM1 li Ref I %[ N inim MMY I 113 riwry MMr- 9t PAcmtlw and P.C.Rmndent SO ON to v w111) Wen Sao to Text Headed MIS/ Gab SIR Gn. IN It to All.-Prof.. P.C.Anm Text Ca .,MG11 to YII AM a fix.Cme,A W,WO s9.Ft.he. be/Sae Con. 0.000 Sq.Ft. III, FifeelY Muo- 0 ratmtlds and P.C.Amendment IN W'. 12.5 „( holm mt o) Wen Spane/Mltl te Text Heeded DOW Mlti.lw•Gydood Fully a Mn t 110 forth TOM EB indntrTel P.C.Unit of IsdeWrlal 20 Inb I'L A) Striel 6)5,000 5R Ft. 6fN.WO 5R• Ft. 121 Saud& iJ AblA'.Pnh. C-1-H Con offlu .49 rY IAMn Y[Gm.A 35.300 SR. WP Ft. 11t Clrlt Plate 26 Adel...reef.. P.C. Cow.Offln •90 e) Fla.Coe. A 320,6W Sq.It. UO.OW S9. AF us. ft. US Harbor 9 Lae-Dmeleyy P.C.Aundent 51 MIS 6 DI'S/ Kill Meldmtill to Text A<n W'e 16 19.0 S. Haebd 124 Ilrlwft 10 Adnln..Prof.. P.C.No UNI.OfflG •W IOOtjI tl.,kn. tJ Fla.Cow. Text MIND)S9. its sit Gnym 16 M1ti-Flelly P. DoleC. 160 'e 10.3 MM to AB W'e W I/ Gdlw Lots Acce In RSWy 50 Katmai..and P.C.Re SIB W'1 6 DOW + ppm Spends DI I)I ' Text lend Alt.W.Oen. 1 127 SaNporter m had.Density P.C.No IN Ca" a CL"/ 1 61 MrtN We LOS Text Acn -•f 120 Pixtawya- a Md Density P.C. No Text IS,MIS B W'I/ ' Mtldentlel MIS NO M s 120 SR A.A. 9 Add.Density R•1•B 51 Do" 6 W'SI Corridor MIS CA Mro b SIR IV Sill Anme 19 Add.GnSit,Alt RIM .114 We 6 W'fI WHO,I.SYR Mc.so'. R-1•B Acrt SOIG MIS III 131 GYSin IS mertlllOn and -U. Wk. 1 ten/lap Mrine Coe. IN Fndedy San'- 12 to DlnSlty R-1-0 Adel...Pelf.. Yet. Attu.South i2 an', fls.Cow (M9er'a Giddna) 13-3-6 133 50 Ave.Corrtbr 6 Red.Density R-3.9 36 We 5 W'I/ •'E A.high den.H Case'I IS W. 1 IN =rt Center 11 Adel..pelf, C-O-N case,.amu, .9I Block,di Ft..Can. 150.W0 So (IndmtGl) Ft. 135 KW Wftelott Cooter 9 I .CMasn,Xo1 to G Text M 245 W', .94 WO Mad 35 DI'1/ann 1X Cuta",e- 25 Mtmtlon And Milne P.C.M HOW)SO ANSICanmtel Co,xerefdl Text MItAASnt 1 1,.00))S9.Ft. , I37 Fnne burvatlon 26 Mt. A 0 S. (156 P.0 Feeney Zoe MIS [eft a1 Mkdr Yln MIST ho.w... Ref. (294 W'S) UWPANCY 1981-19 981 201 9bulh'it,Union 19 Al S Open Space U. Coot f.1/4tall Mt. .NA A1! link.Sy.Ft. WILL t 202 Mn Dup Cade 13 Retail S.M. U. Remnant R,CW Ind. + Mrlh Commercial SR.Ft.,Hotel F a) 796 Mom 203 Commit.PM1a 10 Adde..Prof..Fin P.0 No Can.Offset, .26 ' Rat a Hew.A Haeln Text 120,00 Sq. ,Coaerclai Ft. L0/ malther/ 9 Reels.,Prof.. P C.No Ccsrcial Offlm .Il - AwNdo Fan-Caoercol Text ISO.=54•Ft. 1 Mo III-INITIAL OCCUPANCY 1984-1906 mt PCMOaacone 19 Abin..Prof.,Fin P.C.No Camni Offln .31 1lI,WO to leW Ii5,0o059 191.6W Sq.ft. Ft. IN SnDeree/ 2 Mt/den.and Roast., •0. faenrclal Offlta .69 , McArthur Prof,and Fin W,N)Sq.FL Aex- teunst 15.0St.Ft. - 303 So,CIM q Denral Industry U. in.W1.l .23 Cmt South /10,01)0 Sq.Ft. )01 forth Fart 1 Ro WSerr.,and P.C.- Retell flux .23 0. Gwercal Abis I Feel.. Cmrclal 40.OW M•Ft. and fin. NEST or COVER/ ' MOIST HIRIWAY SAIWE in unnino Residential ISO Stb)ect to S.A.P. GmtY A-1 9W MIS 6 W'1/ IN Coltrane(N.Coast V 26 Satellites and Wen -U• 255 MI. 1/.0 HIRhMy/N.Superidrl SFme end IRA W'I/A 140 Gltnas(N.Gut 22.56 M...if..and Open •U• !)I W'1 12.0 - HIpM1Y/E.SSwrlor) Sae.and WR DJWA 3 205 Rex.S.F. (M 111. 2.31 Subject to 5 A.P. P.0 No 126 MIS 5.9 of 160 Stnet) Text W'1/A 2% MS.N.P.(S.Gt. 31 IS SON't G S.A P. P C.No 465 MIS 14 of lath St II Text WY/A 207 GIlnnt I3.Cant S IS Mc.,and O.S. R-i R4 dr. link. I + My..I.E.R•0•R) WS M.Craft Failed, 292 subject to S.A.P. Gant,A-I 1M W'e and III. Harts,And Related Cos./ Off.Una I � S EXHIBIT E Prudential 134 o0o block number s I `n ' .soo °° � s ~� Civics Plaza 122 ° 700 y M Arthur n Newport Center am �n � ! ,��. ocado 204 t Condominium 135 t—J lJ y CD n u x I ' Pacific LM300 Mutual D Expansion 200 Newport Zia ; . Village 11s Sea Island AV Q� '•• . a• .MECOJSTCOUKTRYCLUO 10o 3, •' 11 a city of 0 NEWPORT BEACH m °o 0 Corporate Plaza West 0 Z00 /• 203 feet Coast Hwy. q i/ Jamboree 301 woVJLMcE PLwNNINa on+ISwH 77-74-77 m 9 OLL CENTER IVEWPORT Lo Everett Davis RGC�,p President Leo= �n4y� nl 43 near - 9 November 1, 1977 NEyyr C./Ir'r 0 , . 5j N Mr. Richard V. Hogan Director of Community Development 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 Dear Dick: The purpose of this letter is to outline the status of development at. Koll Center Newport and, to the extent possible at this time, our plans for future development. Office Site A - 350, 200 Square Foot Allowable Office In addition to Lakeside Restaurant, this site presently con- tains two completed office buildings which are 92, 925 square feet. The six story building under construction at Birch and MacArthur has 109, 648 square feet and this is scheduled for completion by July 1, 1978. We are projecting a lease up pro- gram of one year which would mean a 50% occupancy in 1978 and another 50% in 1979. Additional office space in this site is presently being reserved for a corporate build-to-suit of approximately 60, 000 square feet. There are no plans at this /Z (•)D time for this latter building; it will probably be 1981 before J this is constructed and occupied. Non office uses within this block include one additional restau- rant, 1. 5 acres of retail and a hotel site of 9 . 29 acres. At this time, due to c angl.ng market emd-n an e accep ance of Koll Center Newport as a corporate office park, future use of these parcels may well demand all office space. Office Site B - 860, 600 Square Foot Allowable Office This site contains Koto Restaurant along with 277, 650 square feet of office space, all occupied. We expect to complete construction of two small office buildings in 1978; 25, 000 square feet for The Koll Company on the 1. 7 acres at Birch and Von Karman 1901 Dove Street e Newport Beach 9 California 92660 . (714) 833-3030 zs k 3 . Richard V. Hogan �_ -2S bF 6 November 1, 1977 1 �3r and 5 . 600 square feet 4 ©ngdon & Wilson in the area between Koto and McGaw Laboratories. Plans are now being finalized for 344, 600 square feet of office space in the south portion of this block near the intersection of Jamboree and MacArthur. Tentative completion of this facility is scheduled for July 1, 1979 and we are projecting occupancy over the subsequent 24 months. Development of the 8 acre site on Birch Street is somewhat of a question at this time. However, following the success of the small buildings for sale which we are experiencing in Block D, it is highly probable this type of development may be the best use for this parcel. In this event, approximately 105, 000 square feet would be constructed for completion in a e 1979, . for a 1980 occupancy. , Q7,�f� There are no plans at this time for the other allowable a,( 411 restaurant use in this site. , 1 Ig6 Office Site D - 346,200 Square Foot Allowable Office The first phase of 13 buildings, 126 , 781 square feet, is virtually completed except for interior improvements and most of them are in escrow. Occupancy should be 1978 for this phase. The remainder of the block will contain 11 more buildings, 105;075 sauarp feet, which should be completed by late 1978, for 5` 379 occupancy. �` Office Site G - 45,000 Square Foot Allowable Office This parcel at Birch and Jamboree is presently being sub-divided into four lots; two for office buildings, a drive-up food facility and a coffee shop. Construction of all of these facilities. should occur in 1978 and be completed by the end of the year. Retail & Service Site I Houlihan' s Restaurant is the only existing building on this parcel. . We understand that Harry Akullian has plans for his restaurant adjacent to Houlihan' s and we are selling the remainder of this parcel to Tom White who intends to build a low/medium price food facility. Service Station Site I There are no plans to proceed with this service station at Jamboree and MacArthur. In all probability, this land will be utilized for the office building discussed above for Site B. In summary, the development plans that are contained here are based Richard V. Hogan -3- November 1, 1977 upon current corporate office space requir ements and our ability to obtain the best economic leverage possible. The actual impact of the space will be delayed due to the time necessary to lease the space and convert the shell buildings to completed improvements. While the original buildable area for office space within KCN is approximately 1, 600, 000 square feet, by the modi- fication of our building program on Sites D & G, we have pre- sently under built the allowable area by approximately 345, 000 square feet. Taking this into consideration and building the balance of the unimproved property. out to the allowable within the PC Text, we have still under built our original allowable footage by 21%. ' Hopefully, the information contained herein will satisfy your requirements for your study; should you need additional informa- tion, please give me a call. Very truly yours, KOLL CENTER NEWPORT Everett Davis President ED:rc 1 KOLA. CEMTER NEWPORT I , v h Everett Davis CoCF/VF President NOV�Ea!anety� November 1, 1977 'vFUr or3oF191 p CAU�FACy ' lI Mr. Richard V. Hogan Director of Community Development 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport- Beach, CA 92663 Dear Dick: The purpose of this letter is to outline the status of development at Roll Center Newport and, to the extent possible at this time, our plans for future development. Office Site A - 350,200 Square Foot Allowable Office In addition to Lakeside Restaurant, this site presently con- tains two completed office buildings which are 92, 925 square feet.. The six story building under construction at Birch and MacArthur has 109, 648 square feet and this is scheduled for completion by July 1, 1978. We are projecting a lease up pro- gram of one year which would mean a 500 occupancy in 1978 and another 50% in 1979. Additional office space in this site is presently being reserved for a corporate build-to-suit of approximately 60, 000 square feet. There are no plans at this time for this latter building; it will probably be 1981 before this is constructed and occupied. Non office uses within this block include one additional restau- rant, 1.5 acres of retail and a hotel site of 9.29 acres. At this time, due to changing market demand and the acceptance o£ Roll Center Newport as a corporate office park, future use of these parcels may well demand all office space. Office Site B - 860, 600 Square Foot Allowable Office This site contains Koto Restaurant along with 277, 650 square feet of office space, all occupied. We expect to complete construction of two small office buildings in. 1978; 25, 000 square feet for The Roll Company on the 1. 7 acres at Birch and Von Karman 1901 Dove Street . Newport Beach c California 92660 9 (714) 833-3030 Richard V. Hogan -2- November 1, 1977 and 5, 600 square feet for Langdon & Wilson in the area between Koto and McGaw Laboratories. Plans are now being finalized for 344, 600 square feet of office space in the south portion of this block near the intersection of Jamboree and MacArthur. Tentative completion of this facility is scheduled for July 1, 1979 and we are projecting occupancy over the subsequent 24 months. Development of the 8 acre site on Birch Street is somewhat of a question at this time. However, following the success of the small buildings for sale which we are experiencing in Block D, it is highly probable this type of development may be the best use for this parcel. in this event, approximately 105, 000 square feet would be constructed for completion in' late 1979 , for a 1980 occupancy. There are no plans at this time for the other allowable. restaurant use in this site. Office Site D - 346,200 Square Foot Allowable Office The first phase of 13 buildings, 126,781 square feet, is virtually completed except for interior improvements and most of them are in escrow. Occupancy should be 1978 for this phase. The remainder of the block will contain 11 more buildings, 105, 075 square feet, which should be completed by late 1978, fora 1979 occupancy. Office Site G - 45, 000 •Sguare Foot Allowable Office This parcel at Birch and Jamboree is presently being sub-divided into four lots; two for office buildings, a drive-up food facility and a coffee shop. Construction of all of these facilities should occur in 1978 and be completed by the end of the year. Retail & Service Site I . Houlihan' s Restaurant is the only existing building on 'this parcel. . We understand that Harry Akullian has plans for his restaurant adjacent to Houlihan's and we are selling the remainder of this parcel to Tom White who intends to build a low/medium price food facility. Service Station Site I There are no plans to proceed with this service station at Jamboree and MacArthur. In all probability, this land will be utilized for the office building discussed above for Site B. In summary, the development plans -that are contained here are based Richard V. Hogan -3- November 1, 1977 upon current corporate office space requirements and our ability to obtain the best economic leverage possible. The actual impact of the space will be delayed due to the time necessary to ' lease the space and convert the shell buildings to completed improvements. While the original buildable area for office space within KCN is approximately 1, 600,000 square feet, by the modi- fication of our building program on Sites D & G, we have pre- sently under built the allowable area by approximately 345,000 square feet. Taking this into consideration and building the balance of the unimproved property. out to the allowable within the PC Text, we have still under built our original allowable footage by 21%. Hopefully, the information contained herein will satisfy your requirements for your study; should you need additional informa- tion, please give me a call.- Very truly yours, KOLL CENTER NEWPORT Everett Davis President ED:rc ? i KOLL CENTER 9,EWR®RT Everett Davis CoCFiVF OEv:(p y p� � President u�if Q` gey 9 Np�3 November 11 1977 NF oR Cop V� C , EACH, Mr. Richard V. Hogan Director of Community Development 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 Dear Dick: The purpose of this letter is to outline the status of development at Koll Center Newport and., to the extent possible at this time, our plans for future development. Office" Site A - 350,200 Square Foot Allowable Office In addition to Lakeside Restaurant,- this site presently con- tains two completed office buildings which are 92, 925 square feet. The six story building under construction at Birch and MacArthur has 109, 648 square feet and this is scheduled for completion by July 1, 1978. We are projecting a lease up pro- gram of one year which would mean a 50% occupancy in 1978 and another 50% in 1979. Additional office space in this site is presently being reserved for a corporate build-to-suit of approximately 60, 000 square feet. There are no plans at this time for this latter building; it will probably be 1981 before this is constructed and occupied. Non office uses within this block include one additional restau- rant, 1.5 acres of retail and a hotel site of 9.29 acres. At this time, due to changing market demand and the acceptance �of Koll Center Newport as a corporate office park, future use of these parcels may well demand all office space. Office Site B - 860, 600 Square Foot Allowable Office This site contains Koto Restaurant along with 277, 650 square feet of office space, all occupied. We expect to complete construction of two small office buildings in. 1978; 25,000 square feet for The Koll Company on the 1.7 acres at Birch and Von Karman 1901 Dove Street 9 Newport Beach . California 92660 . (714) 833-3030 Richard V,. Hogan -2- November 1, 1977 and 5, 600 square feet for Langdon & Wilson in the area between Koto and McGaw Laboratories. Plans are now being finalized for 344,.600 square feet of office space in the south portion of this block near the intersection of Jamboree and MacArthur. Tentative completion of this facility is scheduled for July 1, 1979 and we are projecting occupancy over the subsequent 24 months. Development of the 8 acre site on Birch Street is somewhat of a question at this time. However, following the success of the small buildings for sale which we are experiencing in Block D, it is highly probable this type of development may be the best use' for this parcel. In this event, approximately 105, 000 square feet would be constructed for completion in late 1979 , for a 1980 occupancy. There are no plans at this time for the other allowable restaurant use in this site. Office Site D - 346,200 Square Foot Allowable Office The first phase of 13 buildings, 126,781 square feet, is virtually completed except for interior improvements and most of them are in escrow. Occupancy should be 1978 for this phase. The remainder of the block will contain 11 more buildings, 105,075 square feet, which should be completed by late 1978, for a 1979 occupancy. Office Site G - 45,000 Square Foot Allowable Office This parcel at Birch and Jamboree is presently being sub-divided into- four lots; two for office buildings, a drive-up food facility and a coffee shop. Construction of all of these facilities should occur in 1978 and be completed by the end of the year. Retail & Service Site I Houlihan' s Restaurant is the only existing building on this parcel. . We understand that Harry Akullian has plans for his restaurant ' adjacent to Houlihan's and we are selling the remainder of this parcel to Tom White who intends to build a low/medium price food facility. Service Station Site I There are no plans to proceed with this service station at Jamboree and MacArthur. In all probability, this land will be utilized for the office building discussed above for Site B. In summary, the development plans that are contained here are based Richard V. Hogan -3- November 1, 1977 upon current corporate office space requirements and our ability to obtain the best economic leverage possible. The actual impact of the space will be delayed due to the time necessary to lease the space and convert the shell buildings to completed improvements. While the original buildable area for office space within KCN is approximately 1,600,000 square feet, by the modi- fication of our building program on Sites D • & G, we have pre- sently under built the allowable area by approximately 345, 000 square feet. Taking this into consideration and building the balance of the unimproved property out to the allowable within the PC Text, we have still under built our original allowable footage by 21%. Hopefully, the information contained herein will satisfy your requirements for your study; should you need additional informa- tion, please give me a call. Very truly yours, KOLL CENTER NEWPORT Everett Davis President ED:rc Ford Aerospace& Communications Corporation Aeronutronic Division Ford Road Newport Beach,California 92663 October 28, 1977 Mr. Richard Hogan City of Newport Beach City Hall 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 Dear Mr. Hogan: In accordance with the discussions at our meeting on October 26, I am providing the following estimate of planned development on the Aeronutronic- Ford 200 acre site. Industrial Current permanent buildings 772, 000 sq. ft. Temporary modular buildings constructed in September and October 1977 60, 000 sq. ft. New permanent building - estimated completion 3/79 120, 000 sq. ft. Additional temporary structures - construction in 1/78 240000 sq. ft. Removal of temporary structures - 9/79 (84, 000 sq. ft. ) Additional building construction - 1980 to 1985 120, 000 sq. it. Additional building construction - 1985 to 1990 120, 000 sq. ft. Residential 1978 and 1979 '500 units 1980--- '150 units The above outlined construction will complete development of bur site. If there is any other information required, please advise me. Very truly, yours, • � 1 r m of 1�' T. F. Morri Y Director Industrial Rela ons S. .C' Y Joint City Council / October_17 , 1977 Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Item No . 1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH October 11 , 1977 TO: City Council and Planning. Commission FROM: Department of Community Development SUBJECT : General Plan Review At its meeting of September 19 , 1977 , the City Council directed the Planning Commission to review the General Plan , giving particular attention to the Land Use , Residential Growth , Circulation , and Recreation and Open Space Elements , and to the other Elements as appropriate . Also to be considered as part of this review are density designations , phasing of new development in connection with circulation capacities , and the impact of present and future airport activities on the General Plan . Specific recommendations are to be forwarded to the City Council in the group of General Plan amendments to be considered by the Planning Commission in February, 1978. The City Council further directed that necessary studies begin immediately with opportunities for full participation by all interested parties . The purpose of this memo is to outline the possible goals and scope of this review, and to suggest a possible work schedule leading up to the February, 1978 General Plan Amendment session . Issues and Possible Goals to be Addressed in General Plan Review Based on previous discussion of this matter, a list of possible issues and alternative goals to be addressed in this review has been compiled . This list is intended to facilitate discussion and is not necessarily inclusive . As part of this process , the City Council and Planning Commission may also wish to review the General Plan Policies Report to assure that important policies are included in the General Plan review. Four basic planning issues and possible alternative goals for this review have been identified as follows : 1 . Issue : Intensity of Development Possible Alternative Goals : (a ) Adjust intensity of development to assure a balance between development and support systems including the circulation system, sewer, water and energy systems . (b ) Focus General Plan review on density designations and intensity of development for major undeveloped sites . (c ) Consider adjusting density designations and intensity of development throughout the City including the older sections where significant intensification may occur as a result of the build-out of existing residential and commercial areas . 2 . Issue : Traffic Possible Alternative Goals : (a ) Adjust intensity of development and/or capacity of street system to assure that there is no deficiency in any segment of the circulation system at ultimate development. 0 • TO : City Council and Planning Commission - 9 (b) Accept deficiencies at a specified limit in certain segments of the circulation system. (c) Prepare a development schedule which will assure that deficiencies will not exceed a specified limit between the present time and ultimate development. (d) Accelerate development of traffic facilities that would improve levels of service accommodating growth both inside and outside the City . (e ) Expand the City' s i'nvolVement in promoting solutions to regional transportation problems especially in the areas of air traffic , mass transit, and highway improvements . 3. Issue : Cost/Revenue Impact Possible Alternative Goals : (a ) Emphasize new development which generates surplus revenues such as offices , hotels , and restaurants , and certain other commercial uses . (b ) Emphasize residential development rather than commercial development wherever possible . (c ) De-emphasize development of new tourist-related facilities . (d) Determine the fiscal impact of major commercial /office developments such as Newport Center. 4 . Issue : Environmental 'Quality Possible Alternative Goals : (a ) Emphasize improvement of air and water quality through revisions to plans and development standards . ( b ) Emphasize reduced energy consumption through land use regulations , the design of major public works and conservation programs . (c) Identify areas where new development can be accommodated with the least potential for environmental damage . Scope of General Plan Review It is anticipated that this review will focus primarily on the Land Use, Residential Growth and Circulation Elements , with attention to the Recreation and Open Space Elements and other Elements as they relate to residential density and commercial /industrial intensity of development . (These Elements are currently being revised and reprinted to incorporate all previous amendments and will be distributed to the City Council and Planning Commission as they become available . ) With respect to existing and projected development, staff has attached an overall land use summary and development projection for specific sites , prepared for the City Council during the last General Plan Amendment session . Additional land use data will be provided as required during the course of this study. Information relating to traffic service levels and key elements of the circulation system have been requested from the Public Works Department . Traffic Model The Traffic Model currently under development will be available for use during this General Plan review. Testing of the current conditions model is underway. The future conditions model -- based TO : City Council and Planning Commission - 3 on projected land use and circulation system under the existing General Plan -- is expected to be completed during the month of December, 1977 . With respect to future land use and circulation , the Traffic Model can be utilized to test the effects of various alternative levels of development and various improvements to the circulation system, subject to re-programming as necessary. The possible costs and time requirements of conducting such special tests are being evaluated . Development Schedule for Major Undeveloped Sites In connection with the City Council ' s consideration of a development phasing system during the last General Plan Amendment session , a development schedule for the major undeveloped sites in the City was compiled with the assistance of The Irvine Company. This information will be made available for use in the General Plan review . Relationship to Local Coastal Program The California Coastal Act of 1976 requires each local agency in the coastal zone to prepare a Local Coastal Program -- consisting of a land use plan and implementing regulations -- to bring local planning into conformance with the policies of the Coastal Act . The City is currently in the initial phase of preparing a Local Coastal Program. The Planning Commission conducted public hearings on September 1 and 15 , 1977 regarding coastal planning issues which must be addressed in the LCP . At its October 25 , 1977 meeting , the City Council will be considering a draft Issue Identification report , recommended for approval by the Planning Commission . This note is inserted here to inform the City Council and Planning Commission that many of the issues raised in this General Plan review may need to be considered also in the LCP process . Suggested Work Program_ The review of, the General Plan and the formulation of amendments as a result of that review can be expected to involve as a minimum the following tasks : 1 ) An assessment of existing conditions and development trends in terms of the existing General Plan and zoning regulations . Data gathering. 2 ) Identification of problem areas in terms of possibTe imbalance between development and support systems . Input from Traffic Model . 3) Review of policy areas , identification of goals , and assignment of priorities in formulating possible amendments . 4 ) Assessment of possible need for additional consultant services in the areas of cost/revenue impact and traffic analysis . 5 ) Identify possible approaches to controlling growth such as (a ) reducing intensity of development in the newer, undeveloped areas of the City , or (b ) reducing potential growth throughout the City . 6 ) Test the effects of alternative development plans in terms of cost/ revenue impact , impact on support systems , air and water quality, noise , housing costs , and energy. 7) Revise policies as desired, and evaluate means of implementation through amendments to the General Plan Elements . TO: City Council and Planning Commission - 4 8) Review recommended changes to the General Plan in terms of Coastal Act policies . 9) Review recommended changes to the General Plan in terms of the California Environmental Quality Act . A tentative schedule for completion of tasks and hearings is attached. Public Participation In connection with this General Plan review, the City Council has directed that all interested individuals and organizations be given an opportunity to participate in the review process . It is the intention of staff to make progress reports monthly to the City Council and Planning Commission , either at regular meetings or joint meetings as desired. At that time the public will have an opportunity to question or comment on the review process . In addition , staff intends to conduct informal briefing sessions with interested groups and individuals as required. Suggested Action Direct staff to provide information and conduct studies as appropriate in connection with the review of the General Plan . Respectfully submitted, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R. V , Hogan , Director By i . David Dmo owski Advance Planning Administrator DD :jmb Attachments : 1 ) Land Use Summary 2) Proposed Schedule 5• ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE SUMMARY Commercial / Office Industrial Area A DU ' s Floor Area Floor Area Existing 18,912 3,062 ,059 759 , 738 Projected Additional 5 ,083 1 , 615 ,670 -16 , 858 Total 23 ,995 4 ,677, 729 742 , 880 Area 8 Existing 8, 826 9 , 089 , 194 1 , 266 ,564 Projected Additional 2 , 135 6 ,956 ,687 1 , 344 ,406 Total 10 ,981 16 ,045 ,881 2 , 610 ,970 Area C Existing 3 , 748 401 ,098 - Projected Additional 744 - - Total 4 ,492 401 , 098 - City_ Total_ Existing 31 ,486 12 ,552 , 351 2 , 026 , 302 Projected Additional 7 ,962 8, 572 , 357 1 , 327 ,548 Total 39 ,448 21 , 124 ,708 3, 353, 850 SPECIFIC SITES Commercial / Office Industrial New_port Center DU ' s Floor Area Floor Area Existing 67 3,019 , 270 - Projected Additional 471 2 , 781 ,083 - Total 538 5 , 800 , 353 - G+, Airport Area Commercial / (North of Office Industrial Bristol ) HIS Floor Area Floor Area Existing - 11930 ,600 386,564 Projected Additional - 1 , 315 ,006 239 ,406 Total - 3,245 ,606 625 ,970 Commercial Mariner' s Mile DU ' s Existing 72 348,738 27,700 Projected Additional -46 396 ,39-9 -700 Total 26 745, 137 27,000 Cannery Village/ McFadden Square Existing 451 374 ,026 75 ,446 Projected Additional - 38 216 , 399 -45 ,000 Total 413 590,425 30 ,446 Central Balboa Existing 187 117,600 - Projected Additional - -13 ,000 - Total 187 104 ,600 - Aeronutronic-Ford Site (Office/Industrial ) Existing - 801 , 100 Projected Additional 600 300 ,000 Total 600 1 , 101 , 100 No- I I -- a ♦=.y % \r ��•' �, \ r-� "t ��_. ,1 i' Y 1' �a� . %�mob\ -�— / ®O�. �� j; .-•:�"` .iS(L�.:: . -"\_� � -4e V�� •� -\ `!>d,T.' ice' , a; f -_''; " !*±`h;, `> wm; •a .i it �� aAe `"�°,`\ _` (• ��• ([5 Jt .�y• .r- � ` `� ��• '.'r. ILI VIX- '.y." ✓ � h-di `_r'�� �1� _yam.`^• _..'V � �f. e•i•s` 1�� �.-6�"o � \/ I nG� a• � '�" as _ _ "` .. �•f��_�' _ i � S,•t`r�/^✓'.�1(� ass. � J,��CPiia�;�::,...'.i .. -- ,-- .�;+ii^ '. ::, :i" , ,,,;-. •pi" iit'��i {�11.1.1� t. r'' -�-i '."'" e�._s7�J����-` �r � �_ = _ __ .. . 71i:a: I: i•.. .:;ti Q \\'2 1•. �.>�i s r � ¢�v�' 0^' _ . __ R..... -ram _v' - � p tii �a C-eat --:._i -� �--�_- - lJ� ,p= •� - -- `r' C '•i•NI Y•.i �a��.s �_^i•��_ - CITY OF NEW BEACH t C t i-n! =''O�._C g .\• m.n.w,rmu —�- / s OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY City Council Meeting 17 25 14 28 12 27 9 30 13 27 Planning Commission 17 20 3 17 1 15 5 19 2 16 Meeting TASK: Data Gathering Identification of Problem Areas Traffic Model Identification of Goals Identify Approaches to Growth Control a c� Develop Alternative m Plans z Review of Implementa- tion Methods Progress Reports • February 1978 Amendment Hearings DEVELOPMENT STATISTICS • NEWPORT PLACE August 15, 1977 Land Area Building Area Full Occupancy RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT Acres Gross Net Date lz3dsting 27.370 445,106 400,188 1977 In Progress Davis Building 2.376 38,250 37,308 8/1/78 Pope Building ' 2.200 36,000 32,292 8/1/78 Myers Complex 4.400 66,000 61,000 11/1/78 Auto Club 1.500 20,000 18,000 9/1/78 . Planned Air Cal 2.936 32,000 28,800 1/1/81 OFFICE & COMMERCIAL Fist n� 41.204 744,717 670,246 1977 In Progress MacArthur Centre 6.506 210,000 150,000 9/1/79 . Planned 10/1/78 Ketchum Building 5.387 75,000 7/l/80 Theme Site 11.200 320,000 SERVICE — Restaurants, Retail, Recreation Exist: 16.447 206,248 1977 -• In Progress 9/1/78 Plaza Newport 3.900 41,000 8/1/78 Benihana 1.399 8,250 AUTOMOTIVE all d 9.800 62,400 1977 HOTEL 229 1977 6.000 137, Existing Planned 2.766 83,000 9/1/78 TOTAL 145.391 2,525,200