Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutD-1 - Lease and Environmental Document for the Balboa Bay ClubCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER May 12, 1986 Council Agenda Item No. D - BY THE CRY COUNCIL CITY OF TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MAY 12 19863 FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: LEASE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT FOR THE BALBOA BAY CLUB APPROVED The Balboa Bay Club Ad Hoc Committee has finished their assign- ment and submitted their complete report to the City Council for the Council's consideration and action. This report and attendant attach- ments to the report are contained in the Council material distributed with the agenda. Members of the Committee are prepared to respond to any questions that the members of the Council may have with respect to the proposed lease. Also attached to this memorandum is the Environmental Document that was prepared and filed with the County Clerk's Office for the proposed lease extension as recommended by the Ad Hoc Committee. If the City Council, following the public hearing, accepts and approves the Environmental Document, the following findings are suggested: 1. That the initial study and Negative Declaration have been prepared for the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the State CEQA guidelines and City Council Policy K-3. 2. That the information contained in the Environ- mental Document has been considered in the decision on the project. 3. That, based upon the information in the initial study, the project will not have a significant affect on the environment. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That the City Council hold the public hearing after which the Council: a) Accepts and approves the Environmental Document with the three findings as contained in the staff report, and b) Approves the lease document and authorize the Mayor to sign said document. RLW:ets ROBERT L. WYNN A ttachments Authorized to Publish Advertisements of all`nlnds Including public notices by Decree of the Superior Court of Orange County, California, Number A-6214, dated 29 September, 1961, and A-24831, dated 11 June, 1963. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange PubIK Nonce Aavwuveq co.weC III mea enicevn Ie rn ,n 1 pwnt r@, 10 "1 col... �lh I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the NEWS -PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange�LICe HEARINGnia, and that a Notice of ��UU of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna Beach issues of said newspaper for 1 time consecutive weeks to wit the issue(s) of 198 6 198- 198- 198- 198— I 98_198_198 - 198— I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. at on Mesa, Cal May 1 198 6 MESA DEVELOPMENT CO., INC. POST OFFICE BOX 1974 "REQ EM AM AMDA COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626 T- Co TELEPHONE (714) 979-9991 MNTEVP C111 ot 'C� 'Cill (3t "'t k�j EWPOR1 BEA April 22, 1986 MAY sisa R ni to UV ECEIVED Mr. Craig T. Bluell Cjj� n"rm .4 Cry Senior Planner - Planning Department 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California 92663 T Dear Craig: Once again, we would like to bring you and your staff up to date on our activities to secure property suitable in zoning and location for affordable housing in Newport Beach. In addition to our Newport Seacrest Project, which is now approx- imately twenty percent (200) complete, we have been earnestly looking for additional property and, in this effort, we have found several locations and are presently in negotiations with the land owners of three (3) separate parcels. one of these parcels would be for new construction and the other two parcels would require complete rehabilitation of two older buildings. Within a short period of time, we expect to conclude our nego- tiations on one or more of these parcels, enabling us to bring you a complete proposal for the use of your C.D.B.G. funds for 1986. In light of our current activities and our past performance, we are requesting that you set aside the 1986 C.D.B.G. funds for our use in -another project to supply housing to lower in- come residents of Newport Beach. We appreciate your time and consideration and are looking for- ward to another successful project. Very truly xoyt, James G. White /rh RECEIVED ti� APR Z 4 1986 C" C.. 14EWPORT PEkc-,H. r t,X CAUF. I CET, 0E NEWPORT BEAGH, CALtf. MAY 221986 RECEIVED CITY CLERK 1 �w ESTABLISH ED 1933 Mayor Phil Maurer City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California Dear Mayor Maurer, Tonight, the City Council favorable and positive action Bay Club lease. May 12, 1986 has the opportunity to take on the extension of the Balboa Since the founding of the Balboa Bay Club, the organization has always played a significant role in the bettering of our community. From Debutante Balls to charity fund raisers such as the Kentucky Derby Day for numerous local groups or ATSC's Golden Touch Awards, almost 100,000 people who are non-members of the club are allowed to utilize the facilities for these kinds of functions. As President of the Board of Directors of ATSC, I know first hand how much the assistance of the Balboa. Bay Club has meant to the great success of our own organization's fund raisers as well as the Board training sessions we've been able to hold at the club. The Balboa Bay Club takes its responsibilities of interaction with the community seriously and there are few organizations that exhibit the kind of necessary leadership to see that this interaction occurs. From an economic point of view, the terms of the lease seem equitable to both sides, and really exhibit some very good business dealing on the city side. The terms will generate millions of extra revenue dollars to the city that will in turn be recycled back into the local community to provide the necessary services and benefits the residents of Newport Beach expect. The extension of the Balboa Bay Club lease is good for the city and the residents. The relationship between the BBC and the community has always been strong and positive. The good, strong management that makes up the Balboa Bay Club today will ensure that it will always be. I urge your approval and adoption of the f Balboa Bay Club lease extension this evening. / S�a;) nce�ely )-p�;e es Da1.e3131 West Coast Highway, Newport Beach, CA y26 �I4642-7880 W�: J (�.� r 5 �. F850 120 3 )County of Orange ,�)] 0 2/3/1986 DATE Planning Department TO. Patricia Temple, Environmental CoordinaRrPT.'DiST City of Newport Beach FROM COUNTY CLERK PUBLIC SERVICES DIVISION PHONE NO.:. COURTHOUSE, 700 CIVIC CENTER DR., RM. D-100, SANTA ANA SUBJECT. ENVIRONtENTAL IMPACT REPORTS - AMENDMENT OF "PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE" EFFECTIVE JN�v.;RY 1, 1985. 834-2710 SEC. 21152(c) THE ATTACHED NOTICE WAS RECEIVED, FILED, AND A COPY POSTED 12/31/1985 IT REMAINED POSTED FOR 30 (THIRTY) CALENDAR DAYS. '^1 GARY L. GRANVILLE County Clark and Clerk d the Superior Court of the State ,,rahfornta, in and f County d Orsage. By— f' j 31152 PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE (c) All natitaa glad oorsaw w thn sacttoo shill be a tilabk for ptlbbc wap rboo, and *ball be pmd W a r adh bus ra the Office of the = ty clerk Foch aotxe aW t9ttaam plod for a period of 30 by► and t►vsfter . she Clerk shall return to the local a mcy the nonce mth a tloa ala d Je parva K w posted Tbc keae gmcy sW ntun the nonce for ant hlp Lbw ane eoaths Anna" Lau 39" d 2l0 j a. d 3357 11 REGATI'JE DECLARATION TO: 0 Secretary for Resources 1416 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 t^ t County Clerk of the County of Orange P.O.BoN 639, Santa Ana, CA 92702 NAME OF PROJECT PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Balboa Bay Cluh Lease FROM: PLANNING DEPART:.LFNT CITY OF t!C`lPORT 5EACIH P.O. BOx 1768 NE°::PORT BEACH, CA 92658-8915 122.1 W. Coast Highway, Newport Beach, CP. Lease extension for existing operation. DEC 31 i98g ry I Imo. I. PUT' fl i. 3 FINDING: Pursuant to the provisions of City Council Poticy K-3 pertaining to procedures and guidelines to implement the California Environmental Quality Act, the Environmental Affairs Committee has evaluated the proposed project and deter -fined that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment. MITIGATION MEASURES: NONE POSTED' DF C 3 11985 f,._ .•,-/..... C:Ul:y Clerk gYl (y EPUTY INITIAL STUDY PREPARED BY: city of Newport ~;each INITIAL STUDY AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT: 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach,. CA DATE RECEI'JED FCR FILI';G: Environmental Coordinator Date: December 30 1985 v v 1986 _..r A ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (To Be Completed By Lead Agency) 1. Name of Proponent C 11-q 0 F N SW1202-T -6I;AC N 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent _8wo Mama BLV .a P10'. `box 1-703, Als wm .T 3r Ac. µ (A. 92052-3114; Am: 'XpAuz L. WgmN t Cipt MoNA-(SEK. -7ISI--(p4i4i-3000 3. Date of Checklist Submitted 4. Agency Requiring Checklist C JT4 OF �1 F-WPOP-T BEA.C_4 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable �`j�50P 3A LLUp� LEA Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) Yes May No I. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? X c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? K e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? )X f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or chrnges in siltation, deposition or erosion whip:: may modify the channel of a river or strr:: tm or the bed of the ocean or any bay, in li t or lake? )( A f Yes M be No g. Exposure of people or property to geolo- gic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar. hazards? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? x b. The creation of objectionable odors? X c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of di- rection of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage pat- terns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? ! iC c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? �( d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, in- cluding but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of rwople or property to water re- lated hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? k A f Yes Maybe No 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? �( b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? )( c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X( d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? )( S. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? �( d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? x 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? X b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? �( 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce r new light or glare? X 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a sub- stantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X Yes M be No b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? X 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? �( 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing hous- ing, or create a demand for additional housing? k 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional' vehicular movement? X b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X_ c. Substantial impact upon existing transpor- tation systems? X d. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and/or goods? X e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? x f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: C3. Fire protection? X b. Police protection? �( c. Schools? Yes Maybe No d. Parks or other recreational facilities? i< e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? X 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _( b. Substantial increase in demand upon exist- ing sources of energy, or require the X development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? �C b. Communications systems? X c. Water? X d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? )C 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?_ 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? _� Yes Maybe No b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? X c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? �( 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wild- life population to drop below self sus- taining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? ' X b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short- term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) X C. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively con- siderable? (A project may in -pact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? �( 111. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation IV. Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency) e On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environ- ment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date Signature For