Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08 - Overriding ALUC's Determination of Inconsistency and Adopting the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update - Amended PagesFebruary 8, 2022 Item No. 8 RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 6T" CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT FOR THE 2021-2029 PERIOD AS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. GP2021-006 (PA2017-141) WHEREAS, State Housing Element Law, Section 65580 et seq. of the California Government Code, requires each city and county adopt a housing element that identifies and analyzes existing and projected housing needs within their jurisdiction and prepare goals, policies, and programs, and quantified objectives to further the development, improvement, and preservation of housing; A WHEREAS, the Housing Element is one of the mandatoents of the General Plan that must be periodically updated in accordance with StaLfff WHEREAS, the 6th Cycle Housing Element coveri g the 2021-2029 period ("Housing Element") presents a framework for meeiing thg using needs of existing and future resident populations within the City of NLKwporTBeach ("City") based on the Regional Housing Needs Assessment ("RHNA") allocation of 4,845 new housing units; WHEREAS, the City conducted extensive public outreach activities starting in 2019 with the Newport Together, a Ioten & Learn process, to guide and inform a future General Plan Update in order toar from a broad spectrum of community members on community values, assess" e current General Plan Vision, and provide recommendations for a future General Plan Update; M A WHEREAS, Newport Together was guided by the General Plan Update Steering Committee, a body appointed by the City Council to oversee seven Listen & Learn community meetings, which provided information for the Housing Element update process; WHEREAS, the City Council created a citizens advisory committee called the Housing Element Update Advisory Committee ("HEUAC") to assist in the preparation of an updated Housing Element in order to: (1) ensure sufficient public outreach and stakeholder input, (2) provide guidance to City staff, and consultants, on goals and policies, and (3) make recommendations to the City Council regarding the Housing Element update; Resolution No. 2022 - Page 5 of 11 Section 4: The City Council finds that pursuant to Government Code Section 65583.2(g)(2), based on substantial evidence set forth in Section 4 (Housing Plan) and Appendix B (Sites Suitability Analysis) of the Housing Element, the existing uses identified to accommodate affordable housing are likely to be discontinued during the planning period, and therefore do not constitute an impediment to additional residential development during the period covered by the Housing Element. This finding is based, in part, upon the following, which sets forth the comprehensive review of all possible opportunities for additional residential development that can accommodate affordable housing during the planning period considered by the City including, but not limited to, work by the HEUAC, which was created by the City Council and was comprised of experts in housing development including affordable housing, general real estate development, construction, and law, and whose members credentials are set forth in Exhibit D. In reviewing these possible residential opportunities, the HEUAC used a set of guiding principles to determine if each of those areas and their individual traits support a likelihood for redevelopment, as noted below. A. Determination of Focus Areas: Based upon the parameters set forth in the State Housing Element Law, the criteria developed during the Newport Together outreach process, feedback from stakeholders, utilization of the SCAG's GIS -Based HELPR Tool and further refinement by the HEUAC the following focus areas were identified to accommodate the City's RHNA allocation: • Airport Area; • West Newport; • Dover -Westcliff; • Newport Center; • Coyote Canyon'; and • Banning Ranch. B. HEUAC Methodology: Within each Focus Area, HEUAC subcommittees assigned each parcel within the Focus Area a feasibility rating ("Infeasible", "Potentially Feasible", or "Feasible") — analyzing the parcel's propensity for redevelopment during the planning period as follows: • "Feasible Sites" are those that appear that they could feasibly be redeveloped for housing or have housing added to the Parcel while the current use remains in whole or in part.