Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1529 - RECOMMEND TO ADOPT GPA_HARBOR ELEMENTRESOLUTION NO. 1529 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE ADOPTION OF A HARBOR ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN [GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. GPA 2000- 002 (C)] WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 65303 of the California Government Code, allows the General Plan to include any optional elements that relate to the physical development of the City; and WHEREAS, the Harbor and Bay Element is necessary to control the content of Harbor Regulations and Harbor Permit Policies and to assist in land use decisions related to properties adjacent to Newport Bay; and WHEREAS, on May 17, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach held a public hearing regarding the proposed Harbor and Bay Element; and WHEREAS, the public was duly noticed of the public hearing; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act an Initial Study has been conducted to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. The Initial Study concluded that the project could not have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach does hereby recommend that the City Council of the City of Newport Beach approve General Plan Amendment No. GPA 2000 -002 (C) to adopt the Harbor and Bay Element, as provided in Exhibit "A." NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that based upon the information contained in the Initial Study, comments received, and all related documents, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project could have a significant effect on the environment, therefore a Negative Declaration has been prepared. The Planning Commission finds that the Negative Declaration adequately addresses the potential environmental impacts of the project, satisfies all the requirements of CEQA, and reflects the independent judgement of the Planning Commission. The Negative Declaration was reviewed and considered prior to recommending approval of the project. C ADOPTED this 17th day of May 2001, by the following vote, to wit: BY Steven Kiser, S retary AYES McDaniel, Kiser, Agajtanian, Selich, Gifford, Kranzlev and Tucker NOES None C`MWI