Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.0_Lido House Hotel Expansion_PA2020-068 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 21, 2022 Agenda Item No. 3 SUBJECT: Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) • General Plan Amendment No. GP2020-004 • Local Coastal Program Amendment No. LC2020-006 • Zoning Code Amendment No. CA2022-003 • Site Development Review No. SD2020-008 ▪ Conditional Use Permit No. UP2020-039 ▪ Addendum No. 2 to the Lido House Hotel Certified FEIR SITE LOCATION: 3300 Newport Boulevard and 475 32nd Street APPLICANT: R.D. Olson Development OWNER: City of Newport Beach PLANNER: Benjamin M. Zdeba, AICP, Senior Planner 949-644-3253, bzdeba@newportbeachca.gov PROJECT SUMMARY The applicant requests to add 15,103 square feet to the previously approved 130-room Lido House Hotel. The additional floor area would allow the construction of five new cottages (i.e., “rooms”), increased storage space, enlarged pre-function/breakout meeting rooms, a new greenhouse seating room, expansion of three existing hotel rooms, and an enclosed area on the rooftop terrace. Also included is demolition of the former Fire Station No. 2 building to create additional public and private parking spaces. To implement the project, the request requires the following approvals from the City: • General Plan Amendment – To amend Anomaly No. 85 to increase the development limit to 118,573 gross square feet; • Local Coastal Program Amendment – To increase the development limit to 118,573 gross square feet within both the Coastal Land Use Plan and Implementation Plan; • Zoning Code Amendment – To increase the development limit to 118,573 gross square feet; • Site Development Review – To ensure the changes to the site are developed in accordance with applicable development standards; and • Conditional Use Permit – To allow the operational changes that result from the changed site plan and floorplan. • Addendum No. 2 to the Certified Final Environmental Impact Report for the Lido House Hotel – The addendum addresses reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts resulting from the project. 1 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE2 Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Planning Commission, July 21, 2022 Page 2 If approved, a coastal development permit amendment will also be required from the California Coastal Commission since it was the original review authority for the Lido House Hotel project. RECOMMENDATION 1) Conduct a public hearing; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. PC2022-020 recommending City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. GP2020-004, Local Coastal Program Amendment No. LC2020-006, Zoning Code Amendment No. CA2020-003, Site Development Review No. SD2020-008, Conditional Use Permit No. UP2020-039, and Addendum No. 2 to the Certified Final Environmental Impact Report for the Lido House Hotel (SCH#2013111022) (Attachment No. PC 1). 3 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE4 Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Planning Commission, July 21, 2022 Page 3 VICINITY MAP GENERAL PLAN ZONING LOCATION GENERAL PLAN ZONING CURRENT USE ON-SITE Visitor Serving Commercial – Lido Village (CV-LV) Commercial Visitor- Serving—Lido Village (CV-LV) Lido House Hotel and the former Fire Station No. 2 NORTH CV-LV CV-LV Via Lido Plaza Shopping Center SOUTH Mixed-Use Horizontal (MU-H4) Mixed-Use Cannery Village/15th Street (MU-CV/15th St) Mixed-use buildings EAST General Commercial (CG) Commercial General (CG) Office building WEST Corridor Commercial (CC) Commercial Corridor (CC) Multi-tenant commercial buildings Lido House Hotel Former Fire Station No. 2 5 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE6 Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Planning Commission, July 21, 2022 Page 4 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND In September 2014, the Newport Beach City Council approved the 130-room, Lido House Hotel project to replace the former City Hall complex located at the northeast corner of Newport Boulevard and 32nd Street. The City’s approval included amendments of the General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan (CLUP), Zoning Code and applications for a site development review and conditional use permit for hotel construction and operation. In October 2015, the California Coastal Commission approved the proposed CLUP Amendment with suggested modifications and the Coastal Development Permit (CDP) for the 130-room, Lido House Hotel. The City Council subsequently accepted the suggested modifications and approved modified amendments of the General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan and Zoning Code. During the final design phase and preparation of construction documents, the applicant determined that additional floor area was necessary and desirable. As such, in April 2016, the applicant requested to increase the development limit a new maximum of 103,470 square feet. In February 2017, the Coastal Commission authorized the increase. The project completed construction and opened in April 2018. DISCUSSION Applicant’s Request The applicant proposes to increase the development limit and to add 15,103 square feet to the Lido House Hotel. The addition will allow the following changes to the previously approved hotel plans: 1. Addition of 5 three-story cottages (i.e., five “rooms”) encompassing approximately 8,351 square feet; 2. Enclosure of approximately 1,466 square feet as new storage space on Level 1; 3. Addition of 3,481 square feet of covered walkway and pre-function breakout meeting rooms on Level 1; 4. Addition of 600 square feet for a greenhouse breakout/seating room on Level 1; 5. Enlarging three existing guest rooms by a total of 819 square feet on Levels 2, 3, and 4 (approximately 273 square feet each) to convert them to suites; and 6. Enclosure of 386 square feet of rooftop terrace area on Level 4. The proposed project also includes: 7. Demolition of the former Fire Station No. 2 building and replacement with 28 private valet parking spaces and 14 open public parking spaces; 7 Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Planning Commission, July 21, 2022 Page 5 8. Realignment of the driveway access from 32nd Street to accommodate the new cottages; 9. Reconfiguration of the existing on-site circulation and private parking lot to provide additional required parking spaces; and 10. Installation of a new barrier fence with gates along the 32nd Street and Newport Boulevard frontages. In summary, the applicant believes the added area and additional cottages will enhance the experience and are anticipated to make the hotel more successful. Below is a birds- eye rendering of the proposed project looking northwest, which was taken from Attachment PC 4 to this report. Some of the most visible changes are highlighted and include the proposed five cottages, the new breakout room, the new greenhouse, and the new private and public parking areas where the former Fire Station No. 2 building currently sits. Figure 1, Birds-eye view of the proposed project looking northwest at the southeastern elevation. Required Amendments To accommodate the project, the Land Use Element of the General Plan, Local Coastal Program (including both the Coastal Land Use Plan and Implementation Plan [Title 21]), and Zoning Code (Title 20) would all be amended to increase the maximum gross floor area allowed on the site from 103,470 square feet to 118,573 square feet. In addition to increasing the development limits, City staff is recommending that the references to development standards for the Fire Station No. 2 building be removed Five Cottages Breakout Room Greenhouse New Parking 8 Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Planning Commission, July 21, 2022 Page 6 from all three regulatory documents since the references are obsolete, now that the station has already been relocated to 2807 Newport Boulevard and the old station building would be demolished as part of this project. Charter Section 423 Analysis With an amendment to the General Plan, City Charter Section 423 requires an analysis of the increased density, intensity, and peak hour traffic associated with the change to determine if a vote of the electorate is required. The net increases for the proposed amendment are combined with 80 percent of the increases from prior amendments within the same statistical area. The inclusion of prior amendments is limited to the preceding 10 years. The specified thresholds are 100 dwelling units (density), 40,000 square feet of floor area (intensity), and 100 peak hour trips (traffic). Increases from the proposed amendment and 80 percent of the three prior amendments within Statistical Area B-5 have been calculated and are shown in Table 1 below. None of the thresholds would be exceeded with approval of the amendment and no vote would be required. Table 1 Charter Section 423 Analysis for Statistical Area B-5 Amendments Increased Density Increased Intensity Peak Hour Trip Increase AM PM GP 2012-005 7 0 0 0 GP 2012-002 0 23,725 0 0 GP2016-001 0 4,745 0 0 Total Prior Increases 7 28,470 0 0 80% of Prior Increases 5.6 22,776 0 0 100% of the proposed amendment GP2020-006 0 15,103 0 0 Total 5.6 37,879 0 0 Threshold 100 40,000 100 100 Vote Required? No No No No Site Development Review and Conditional Use Permit Major Site Development Review Due to the proposed additions, a major site development review is required per Newport Beach Municipal Code (NBMC) Section 20.52.080 (Site Development Reviews). In accordance with Section 20.52.080(F), the Planning Commission may approve or conditionally approve a site development review application, only after first finding that the proposed development is: 1. Allowed within the subject zoning district; 9 Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Planning Commission, July 21, 2022 Page 7 2. In compliance with all of the applicable criteria identified in 20.52.080(C)(2)(c) below: i. Compliance with this section, the General Plan, this Zoning Code, any applicable specific plan, and other applicable criteria and policies related to the use or structure ii. The efficient arrangement of structures on the site and the harmonious relationship of the structures to one another and to other adjacent developments; and whether the relationship is based on standards of good design; iii. The compatibility in terms of bulk, scale, and aesthetic treatment of structures on the site and adjacent developments and public areas; iv. The adequacy, efficiency, and safety of pedestrian and vehicular access, including drive aisles, driveways, and parking and loading spaces; v. The adequacy and efficiency of landscaping and open space areas and the use of water efficient plant and irrigation materials; and vi. The protection of significant views from public right(s)-of-way and compliance with Section 20.30.100 (Public View Protection). 3. Not detrimental to the harmonious and orderly growth of the City, nor endangers, jeopardizes, or otherwise constitutes a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed development. As discussed and stated more fully in the statements supporting Findings A, B, and C in the draft Resolution (Attachment No. PC 1), the proposed project maintains consistency with the development standards of the CV-LV designations and is in furtherance of the Lido Village Design Guidelines. All additions outside of the existing development envelope will comply with the required setbacks and the overall height of the hotel will remain the same. Furthermore, the proposed project will retain and enhance the significant public open space area along Newport Boulevard. The new greenhouse structure adds visual interest and will fit between the two landmark ficus trees that are protected by City Council Policy G-1. The new single-story breakout room on the 32nd Street frontage also breaks up massing and serves as a screening mechanism for the trash enclosure. The proposed five cottages will be added in line with the other cottages and will mirror the design, such that they are seamlessly integrated. The former Fire Station No. 2 building will be demolished and replaced with public and private parking, which will open the area visually and will provide a public benefit. 10 Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Planning Commission, July 21, 2022 Page 8 The Lido House Hotel project was designed and constructed with an architecturally pleasing style that has since been replicated in other locations of Newport Beach. The proposed project will maintain the established style. It will also help to enhance the existing structure and use while removing the former Fire Station No. 2 building that has since been relocated and is currently transitioning away from the site. The proposed design has been reviewed and accepted in concept by all City departments, including Building, Public Works, and Fire. If approved and implemented, construction will comply with all required codes and applicable City ordinances. Conditional Use Permit In accordance with NBMC Section 20.52.020(F) (Conditional Use Permits and Minor Use Permits), the Planning Commission must make the following findings for approval of a use permit: 1. The use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; 2. The use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Zoning Code and the Municipal Code; 3. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the use are compatible with the allowed uses in the vicinity; 4. The site is physically suitable in terms of design, location, shape, size, operating characteristics, and the provision of public and emergency vehicle (e.g., fire and medical) access and public services and utilities; and 5. Operation of the use at the location proposed would not be detrimental to the harmonious and orderly growth of the City, or endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Staff believes sufficient facts exist in support of each finding as evidenced by the statements to support Findings D, E, F, G, H and I in the draft Resolution (Attachment No. PC 1). The General Plan Land Use Element and zoning designations of the project site allow for the proposed use as modified. With the exception of the proposed increase in floor area, the proposed additions will comply with the development standards of Title 20 (Planning and Zoning) and Title 21 (Local Coastal Program Implementation Plan) of the NBMC. The plans provided by the applicant show the expanded areas and provide a summary of the changes (Attachment No. PC 5). The expanded hotel does not increase building height. Although five new hotel rooms and additional breakout meeting space will be provided, the project includes the equivalent of 165 parking spaces to serve the use. 11 Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Planning Commission, July 21, 2022 Page 9 The Applicant retained Linscott Law & Greenspan to prepare a parking demand analysis (Attachment No. PC 3). The City Traffic Engineer reviewed and accepted the analysis, which forecasted peak demand of the proposed project to be between 147 and 151 parking spaces. As such, there will be adequate on-site parking to serve the project once implemented. The hotel has operated at this location since April 2018 and has not proven detrimental to the surrounding area. Conditions of approval are included to help ensure that, with the proposed changes, the use maintains its compatibility in a harmonious manner. Environmental Review The City prepared and certified a final Environmental Impact Report for the Lido House Hotel (SCH#2013111022). The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines allow for the updating and use of a previously certified environmental impact report (EIR) for projects that have changed or are different from the previous project. In cases where changes or additions occur with no new significant environmental impacts, an Addendum to a previously certified EIR may be prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15164. The City has prepared Addendum No. 2 to the Lido House Hotel Final Environmental Impact Report for the modified project (Attachment No. PC 4). The analysis provided in the Addendum concludes that no new environmental impacts and no impacts of greater severity would result from approval and implementation of the larger hotel project. Public Notice Notice of this hearing was published in the Daily Pilot, mailed to all owners of property within 300 feet of the boundaries of the site (excluding intervening rights-of-way and waterways) including the applicant and posted on the subject property at least 10 days before the scheduled meeting, consistent with the provisions of the Municipal Code. Additionally, the item appeared on the agenda for this meeting, which was posted at City Hall and on the City website. Prepared by: Submitted by: _______________________ Benjamin M. Zdeba, AICP Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS PC 1 Draft Resolution Recommending City Council Approval PC 2 Applicant’s Project Narrative 12 Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Planning Commission, July 21, 2022 Page 10 PC 3 Accepted Parking Demand Analysis PC 4 Addendum No. 2 to the Lido House Hotel Final EIR PC 5 Applicant’s Project Plans 01/12/18 13 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE14 Attachment No. PC 1 Draft Resolution Recommending City Council Approval 15 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE16 RESOLUTION NO. PC2022-020 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE CERTIFIED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR LIDO HOUSE HOTEL, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. GP2020-004, LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO. LC2020-006, ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. CA2022-003, SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. SD2020-008, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. UP2020-039 FOR THE LIDO HOUSE HOTEL LOCATED AT 3300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD AND 475 32ND STREET (PA2020-068) THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FACTS. 1. An application was filed by R.D. Olson Development (“Applicant”) with respect to property located at 3300 Newport Boulevard and 475 32nd Street and legally described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (“Property”). 2. The Applicant is requesting approval to add 15,103 square feet to the previously approved 130-room Lido House Hotel. The additional floor area would allow for the construction of five new cottages (i.e., “rooms”), increased storage space, enlarged pre- function/breakout meeting rooms, a new greenhouse seating room, expansion of three existing hotel rooms, and an enclosed area on the rooftop terrace. Also included is the demolition of the former Fire Station No. 2 building to create additional public and private parking spaces (“Project”). The following approvals are requested or required from the City of Newport Beach (“City”) to implement the Project as proposed: • General Plan Amendment No. GP2020-004 – An amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan increasing the development limit specified for Anomaly Number 85 from 103,470 square feet to 118,573 square feet; • Local Coastal Program Amendment No. LC2020-006 – An amendment to the Coastal Land Use Plan and Implementation Plan (Title 21) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code (“NBMC”) increasing the development limit specified for the Property from 103,470 square feet to 118,573 square feet. While not required to implement the Project, City staff also recommends removing references to the Fire Station No. 2 building, since the use has been relocated and the building will be demolished as part of the Project; 17 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 2 of 40 • Zoning Code Amendment No. CA2022-003 – An amendment to the Zoning Code (Title 20) of the NBMC increasing the development limit specified for the Property from 103,470 square feet to 118,573 square feet. While not required to implement the Project, City staff also recommends removing references to the Fire Station No. 2 building, since the use has been relocated and the building will be demolished as part of the Project; • Site Development Review No. SD2020-008 - in accordance with the Newport Place planned community and Section 20.52.80 (Site Development Reviews) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code (“NBMC”), for the construction of the Project; • Conditional Use Permit No UP2020-039 – Amendment to UP2014-004 (PA2013- 217) and UP2016-015 (PA2016-061), which authorized the construction and operation of the 130-room Lido House Hotel. If approved by City Council and implemented, this Use Permit No. UP2020-039 will replace and supersede the previous approvals; and • Addendum No. 2 to the Lido House Hotel Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2013111022) (“Addendum No. 2”) – Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), the addendum addresses reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts resulting from the Project. 3. The Property is categorized Visitor Serving Commercial – Lido Village (CV-LV) by the General Plan Land Use Element and is located within the Commercial Visitor-Serving – Lido Village (CV-LV) Zoning District. It is designated Anomaly Number 85, which establishes a development limit of 103,470 gross square feet (SF) of hotel. 4. The Property is also in the Coastal Zone. The Coastal Land Use Plan category is Visitor- Serving Commercial-Lido Village – (103,470 Gross SF) (CV-LV) and it is within the Commercial Visitor-Serving—Lido Village (CV-LV) Coastal Zoning District. 5. In addition, the Lido House Hotel is authorized by and operates under Coastal Development Permit (“CDP”) No. 5-14-1785, executed February 22, 2016. The requested legislative amendments and the proposed changes will be referred to, reviewed by, and acted on by the California Coastal Commission to become effective. 6. A public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on July 21, 2022, in the Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and purpose of the hearing was given in accordance with California Government Code Section 54950 et seq. (“Ralph M. Brown Act”) and Chapters 20.62 and 21.62 (Public Hearings) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code (“NBMC”). Evidence, both 18 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 3 of 40 written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the Planning Commission at this hearing. SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DETERMINATION. 1. On September 9, 2014, the City Council certified the adequacy and completeness of the Lido House Hotel Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2013111022) by adopting Resolution No 2014-80 (“EIR”). 2. Upon receipt of the prior application for increased floor area of the Lido House Hotel, the City prepared Addendum No. 1 to the EIR, consistent with the requirements of CEQA. On July 26, 2016, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2016-88 adopting Addendum No. 1. 3. Upon receipt of the current application for increased floor area of the Lido House Hotel, the City prepared Addendum No. 2 to the EIR for the Project. 4. Pursuant to Section 21166 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, when an EIR has been certified for a project, no subsequent EIR is required unless the lead agency determines, based on substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: a. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; b. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or c. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete, shows any of the following: i. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; ii. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; iii. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the 19 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 4 of 40 project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or iv. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. 5. The following environmental topics were analyzed for the Project: Aesthetics/Light and Glare, Agriculture and Forestry Resources, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Energy, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and Planning, Mineral Resources, Noise, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Transportation, Tribal Cultural Resources, Utilities and Service Systems, and Wildfire. Addendum No. 2 includes analysis of new topics that were not included in the previous EIRs; specifically, it includes a new energy section and a new wildfire section. These additional analyses are appropriate for inclusion in the Addendum, but none result in new or increased significant impacts that would require preparation of a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines. 6. Based on the EIR and entire environmental review record, the Project will not result in any new significant impacts that were not previously analyzed in the EIR. The Addendum confirms and provides substantial evidence that the potential impacts associated with this Project would either be the same or less than those described in the EIR, as mitigated by applicable mitigation measures in the EIR. In addition, there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Project would be undertaken that would result in new or more severe environmental impacts than previously addressed in either the EIR, nor has any new information regarding the potential for new or more severe significant environmental impacts been identified. Therefore, in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, an addendum to the previously adopted EIR is the appropriate environmental document for the Project. In taking action to approve any of the requested applications for the Project, the data presented in the EIR, as augmented by the Addendum for this Project, are considered as part of the record. 7. The Planning Commission further finds: a. The Project is consistent with and implements the General Plan. b. The EIR reviews the existing conditions of the City and project vicinity; analyzes potential environmental impacts from implementation of the development; and identifies mitigation measures to reduce potentially significant impacts from implementation of the development. c. The Project does not increase development intensity or building height or associated impacts beyond the levels considered in the EIR. 20 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 5 of 40 d. Since the adoption of the EIR in 2014, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the EIR was certified for the Project; and no substantial changes to the environmental setting of the Property have occurred, and no new information of substantial importance has become available that was not known and that could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at that time of adoption. e. Since no substantial changes to the circumstances or environmental setting have occurred, and since no new information relating to significant effects, mitigation measures, or alternatives has become available, the Project does not require additional environmental review, consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. f. Based on these findings, the EIR and Addendum No. 2, the Planning Commission has determined that no subsequent environmental impact report is required or appropriate under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164. Addendum No. 2 satisfies CEQA’s environmental review requirements for the modified Project as proposed by the Applicant. g. Based on the facts and analysis contained in the Addendum, the Planning Commission finds that the modified project will not have, when compared to the EIR, any new or more severe adverse environmental impacts. h. The modified Project will not result in any new or more severe significant impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable, when viewed in connection with planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity. 8. Addendum No. 2 is hereby recommended for adoption by the City Council given its analysis and conclusions. Addendum No. 2 and related and referenced documentation, constitute the administrative record upon which this decision was based, are on file with the Planning Division, City Hall, 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. 9. The Planning Commission has considered the EIR and the Addendum No. 2 and has concluded that the Addendum No. 2 reflects the independent judgment of the City. 10. The Planning Commission finds that judicial challenges to the City's CEQA determinations and approvals of land use projects are costly and time consuming. In addition, project opponents often seek an award of attorneys' fees in such challenges. As project applicants are the primary beneficiaries of such approvals, it is appropriate that such applicants should bear the expense of defending against any such judicial challenge, and bear the responsibility for any costs, attorneys' fees, and damages which may be awarded to a successful challenger. 21 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 6 of 40 SECTION 3. REQUIRED FINDINGS. General Plan, Zoning Code, and Local Coastal Program Amendments 1. Amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Code, and Local Coastal Program are legislative acts. Neither the City nor State Planning Law set forth any required findings for either approval or denial of such amendments. 2. The increase in floor area will allow enlarged hallways, an enclosed conference room breakout space, an enclosed “greenhouse” breakout and seating area, larger storage spaces, three slightly larger hotel rooms, and five additional hotel rooms. These changes constitute a 14.6-percent increase in floor area compared to the previously approved hotel plan. Collectively, these changes should enhance the functionality of the hotel and the experience of guests and visitors. 3. The increased floor area includes an additional five hotel rooms. This addition would result in a negligible increase in predicted traffic and parking demands for the project. The predicted traffic to and from the proposed hotel will remain less than what the former City Hall site generated. A parking demand analysis was prepared by Linscott Law & Greenspan on June 8, 2022 for the Project and has been reviewed and accepted by the City Traffic Engineer. 4. The increased floor area will not significantly reduce publicly visible open space, nor will it decrease the parking provided. 5. The increased hotel floor area would be located on the first, second, third and fourth levels, but would not increase the height of the building. The proposed hotel would remain consistent with remaining and unchanged applicable standards of the CV-LV Zoning District and Coastal Land Use Policy 4.4.2-1, which limits the height of development. Charter Section 423 Pursuant to City of Newport Beach (“City”) Charter Section 423 and City Council Policy A-18, proposed General Plan amendments are reviewed to determine if a vote of the electorate would be required because a project (separately or cumulatively with other projects in the same Statistical Area over the prior 10 years) exceeds certain thresholds provided in Section 423 of the City Charter. The proposed General Plan Amendment is in Statistical Area B5. This is the seventh amendment within Statistical Area B5 since the General Plan update in 2006. Three of the six prior amendments were approved less than 10 years ago and continue to be tracked consistent with the provisions of Section 423. Those are General Plan Amendment Nos. 22 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 7 of 40 GP2012-005, GP2012-002, and GP2016-001. The following table shows the increases attributable to the subject amendment, prior amendments, and the resulting totals thereby demonstrating that no vote would be required. Charter Section 423, Measure S Analysis for Statistical Area B-5 Amendments Increased Density Increased Intensity Peak Hour Trip Increase AM PM GP2012-005 (PA2012-146) 7 0 0 0 GP2012-002 (PA2012-031) 0 23,725 0 0 GP2016-001 (PA2016-061) 0 4,745 0 0 Total Prior Increases 7 28,470 0 0 80% of Prior Increases 5.6 22,776 0 0 100% of Proposed GP2020-004 0 15,103 0 0 Total 5.6 37,879 0 0 Threshold 100 40,000 100 100 Remaining 94.4 2,121 100 100 Vote Required? No No No No Site Development Review In accordance with Section 20.52.080(F) (Site Development Reviews – Findings and Decisions) of the NBMC, the following findings and facts in support of such findings are set forth as follows: Finding: A. [The proposed development is a]llowed within the subject Zoning district; Fact in Support of Finding: 1. The site is within the CV-LV (Visitor Serving Commercial - Lido Village) zoning district and Section 20.20.020 (Commercial Zoning Districts Land Uses and Permit Requirements) allows visitor accommodations and related accessory uses subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Finding: B. [The proposed development is i]n compliance with all of the applicable criteria [below]: a. Compliance with this Section, the General Plan, this Zoning Code, any applicable specific plan, and other applicable criteria and policies related to the use or structure; 23 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 8 of 40 b. The efficient arrangement of structures on the site and the harmonious relationship of the structures to one another and to other adjacent development; and whether the relationship is based on standards of good design; c. The compatibility in terms of bulk, scale, and aesthetic treatment of structures on the site and adjacent developments and public areas; d. The adequacy, efficiency, and safety of pedestrian and vehicular access, including drive aisles, driveways, and parking and loading spaces; e. The adequacy and efficiency of landscaping and open space areas and the use of water efficient plant and irrigation materials; and f. The protection of significant views from public right(s)-of-way and compliance with Section 20.30.100 (Public View Protections); and Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The modified 135-room hotel project is consistent with the Visitor Serving Commercial- Lido Village (CV-LV) General Plan land use designation, CV-LV (Visitor Serving Commercial - Lido Village) Coastal Land Use Plan category, and the CV-LV (Visitor Serving Commercial - Lido Village) Zoning District for the project site that provides for the horizontal or vertical intermixing of commercial, visitor accommodations, residential, and/or civic uses. Civic uses could include, but are not limited to, a community center, public plazas, and/or public parking. 2. The CV-LV (Visitor Serving Commercial - Lido Village) Zoning District includes setback standards (0 to 70 feet depending on height), open space (20 percent of the site) and building height standards (55 feet to flat roofs, 60 feet for sloping roofs and up to 65 feet for architectural features). The new single-story greenhouse structure will be set back a minimum of 53 feet from Newport Boulevard. The remaining modified hotel building will maintain a setback of more than 69 feet from Newport Boulevard, more than 15 feet from 32nd Street, and more than 62 feet from the northerly (interior) property line. The height of the sloping roof of the four-story portion of the modified hotel remains less than 58 feet, 5 inches and all other portions of the hotel are below this height. Lastly, the proposed site plan provides at least 20 percent of the site as open space consisting of hardscape and landscaping between the hotel and Newport Boulevard and 32nd Street in compliance with the proposed open space standard. 3. The Project is compatible with surrounding development and public spaces in terms of bulk, scale and aesthetic treatments. The large setbacks identified in Facts B.2 above help offset the taller portions of the proposed buildings. Hotel buildings have been designed with a one-, two- and three-story elements along Newport Boulevard while providing a significant setback from the street providing areas for public access, landscaping, outdoor dining, and hotel use. Notwithstanding the new greenhouse structure, the modified hotel building is over 69 feet from the Newport Boulevard. The portions of the hotel structure that are three and four stories are located along the 24 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 9 of 40 northerly and easterly portion of the site away from public spaces and closer to the back of the abutting shopping center that is developed with large buildings with heights close to 35 feet. Additionally, these taller components are separated by approximately 240 feet from the Lido Villas residential project to the east. Based upon the Project drawings, all elevations of proposed new additions will include consistent architectural treatments, articulation and modulation of building masses providing visual interest with a coastal architectural theme specified by the Lido Village Design Guidelines. 4. The Project retains the two large ficus trees designated by Council Policy G-1 as Landmark Trees. The Project also retains the 10 existing tall date palm trees, and provides pedestrian areas, seating areas, and enhanced pavement increasing the aesthetic and use qualities of the setback area. The setback area also provides pedestrian connections from the intersection of Newport Boulevard and 32nd Street along the streets in furtherance of the goals of the Lido Village Design Guidelines. Lastly, the building elevations include lighthouse-like architectural features, simple gable roofs, tight overhangs, simple block massing, and wood siding all with a clear coastal theme consistent with the Lido Village Design Guidelines. 5. Access to the site, on-site circulation, and parking areas are designed to provide standard-sized parking spaces consistent with the Zoning Code, 26-foot-wide, two-way driveways, and the minimum vehicle turning radius to accommodate and provide safe access for residents and guests (including the disabled), emergency vehicles, delivery trucks, and refuse collections vehicles, as determined by the City Traffic Engineer. 6. The Project is subject to the City’s Water-Efficient Landscape Ordinance (Chapter 14.17 of NBMC) and compliance will be confirmed at plan check prior to issuing building permits. 7. Consistent with Section 20.30.100 (Public View Protections), the Certified EIR (Section 5.2 Aesthetics/Light and Glare) provides an analysis of potential impacts to public views from Sunset View Park, Cliff Drive Park and Ensign View Park. Based upon that analysis, the proposed hotel will blend into the urban background and not block any important focal points including the horizon within existing public views from these vantages. Additionally, there are other taller buildings in the vicinity suggesting that proposed building would not be out of character. Specifically, 601 and 611 Lido Park Drive and 3388 Via Lido are taller than the existing hotel and the Project. No significant public views through or near the Project site are present in the immediate vicinity of the site. For these reasons, the analysis concludes that there will be no material impact to public coastal views. While the Project includes increased floor area for the hotel, the proposed five new cottages will be added in line with the existing cottages and most of the other new area will be added on the ground level. Finding: C. [The proposed development is n]ot detrimental to the harmonious and orderly growth of the City, or endanger jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, 25 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 10 of 40 health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed development. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The Project will maintain consistency with the Lido Village Design guidelines by continuing an architecturally pleasing coastal theme. Its articulation and building modulation serve to enhance the urban environment consistent with the Lido Village Design Guidelines. The Project provides a large setback area between the hotel and Newport Boulevard and 32nd Street that includes pedestrian paths, seating and landscape areas that will create a community focal point and providing connections to abutting uses. While the Project includes a low barrier fence along the Newport Boulevard and 32nd Street frontages, the wide gates will remain open at all times when there are no special events occurring in the front lawn area. 2. The Property is in a developed commercial area with limited sensitive land uses located nearby. The overall height of the Project will not materially impact any public views from General Plan designated vantages or significantly shade surrounding properties as demonstrated in Section 5.2 Aesthetics/Light and Glare of the Certified EIR. 3. The Project includes 165 on-site parking spaces using a valet parking plan and bicycle parking. The demolition of the former Fire Station No. 2 building will also allow the creation of 14 new public parking spaces that would be available to hotel guests and the public on a first-come-first-served basis. The Applicant retained Linscott Law & Greenspan to prepare a parking demand analysis. The analysis forecasts a peak parking demand of 151 parking spaces. Therefore, the Project has been designed accommodate all anticipated parking demand. Additionally, the parking lot and vehicular access thereto has been designed to accommodate and provide safe access for passenger vehicles, emergency vehicles, delivery trucks, and refuse collection vehicles. The City Traffic Engineer reviewed and accepted both the parking demand analysis and the revised parking lot layout. 4. Direct vehicular access to Via Lido Plaza will be maintained by the existing driveway and easement located just west of the intersection of Finley Avenue and Newport Boulevard. The main entry to the hotel at Finley Avenue includes adequate parking spaces and vehicular area to accommodate short-term registration and valet parking without conflicting with vehicle access to Via Lido Plaza. The parking control gate at 32nd Street is designed and setback sufficiently to avoid conflicts along 32nd Street. 5. Closing the site to unrestricted vehicular access by the public through the site to 32nd Street would discontinue direct vehicular access to Via Lido Plaza through an existing access gate located near the former Fire Station No. 2. Despite the closure of this access point, adequate vehicular access to Via Lido Plaza for cars, delivery trucks and emergency vehicles is currently provided by an existing driveway at Finley Avenue and an existing driveway from Via Lido. Large delivery trucks and fire trucks can access both parking areas at Via Lido Plaza based upon information contained in a letter from 26 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 11 of 40 Fuscoe Engineering dated April 27, 2014, that is included as part of the Response to Comments within the Certified Final EIR. 6. The Project is subject to the City’s Outdoor Lighting requirements contained within Section 20.30.070 (Outdoor Lighting) of the NBMC. 7. Any rooftop mechanical equipment will continue to be fully enclosed or screened from view consistent with the NBMC. 8. The construction will comply with all Building, Public Works, and Fire Codes. All ordinances of the City and all conditions of approval shall be complied with. Alcohol Sales Finding: D. The use is consistent with the purpose and intent of Section 20.48.030 (Alcohol Sales) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The hotel with its restaurant, bar and lounges has been reviewed and conditioned to ensure that the purpose and intent of Section 20.48.030 (Alcohol Sales) of the NBMC is maintained and that a healthy environment for residents and businesses is preserved. While the hotel is located in an area which has a higher concentration of alcohol licenses than some areas, the hotel will not operate a “public premises” and appropriate licensing and enforcement will be administered by the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. The location of the Project in relationship to residential zoning districts, day care centers, hospitals, park facilities, places of worship, schools, other similar uses and uses that attract minors has been considered. Operational conditions recommended by the Police Department for the sale of alcoholic beverages, including the requirement to obtain an Operator License, will ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses and minimize alcohol related incidents. 2. The Property is in an area with a variety of land uses including commercial, retail, residential, and access the beach and bay. The operational characteristics have been conditioned to maintain the compatibility with surrounding land uses. 3. The Project does not involve an expansion of area devoted to alcohol sales and service. The existing use has been in operation for approximately four years and has not proven detrimental. Conditional Use Permit In accordance with Section 20.52.020 (Conditional Use Permits and Minor Use Permits) of the NBMC, the following findings and facts in support of such findings are set forth as follows: 27 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 12 of 40 Finding: E. The use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable Specific Plan. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. Fact in Support of Finding B.1 is hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is not located within a specific plan area. 3. The Project maintains consistency with the following Newport Beach General Plan Goals and Policies: • Goal LU 1, including Policies LU 1.1 and LU 1.6; • Goal LU 2, including Policies LU 2.6 and LU 2.8; • Goal LU 3, including Policy LU 3.2; • Goal LU 4, including Policy LU 4.2; • Goal LU 5.3, including Policies LU 5.3.5 and LU 5.3.6; • Goal LU 5.6, including Policies LU 5.6.1, LU 5.6.2 and 5.6.3; • Goal LU 6.1, including Policy LU 6.1.1; • Goal LU 6.8, including Policies LU 6.8.1 and LU 6.8.2; • Goal LU 6.9, including Policy LU 6.9.1; • Goal CE 2.1, including Policy CE 2.1.1; • Goal CE 2.2, including Policy CE 2.2.6; • Goal CE 5.1, including Policy CE 5.1.2; • Goal CE 7.1, including Policy CE 7.1.1; • Goal NR 1, including Policy NR 1.1; • Goal NR 3, including Policies NR 3.4, NR 3.9, NR 3.10, NR 3.11, and NR 3.20; • Goal NR 8, including Policy NR 8.1; • Goal NR 18, including Policies NR 18.1 and NR 18.3; and • Goal NR 20, including Policies NR 20.1 and NR 20.2. 4. The City Council concurred with the conclusion of the consistency analysis of the proposed project with these goals and policies provided in the final EIR (FEIR). All mitigation measures specified in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been incorporated as conditions of approval to ensure this consistency is maintained. Finding: F. The use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code and the Municipal Code. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. Facts in Support of Findings A.1, B.2, B.7, C.3, C.6, and C.7 are hereby incorporated by reference. As conditioned, the Project will maintain compliance with all applicable NBMC standards. 28 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 13 of 40 2. The hotel will continue to provide alcohol sales in conjunction with late night hours and as such, the operator is required to obtain a new Operator License from the Police Department pursuant to Chapter 5.25 of the NBMC. This requirement is included in the conditions of approval. Finding: G. The design, location, size, operating characteristics of the use are compatible with the allowed uses in the vicinity. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. Facts in Support of Findings A.1, B.2, B.3, B.5, C.2, C.3, C.5, D.1 and D.3 are all hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The proposed modifications to the existing hotel and its accessory structures are not changing the use, such that operation of the Project will become incompatible with other existing and allowed uses in the vicinity. The added storage areas will help hotel staff be more efficient with less trips outside the building and the enlarged hallways will create more pre-function space to limit the amount of people outside during events. The new breakout rooms are intended to provide an enhanced accommodation that will serve the existing larger meeting and event rooms. Any events outside normal business operations will continue to be reviewed consistent with the provisions of the NBMC to ensure compatibility is maintained. Finding: H. The site is physically suitable in terms of design, location, shape, size, operating characteristics, and the provision of public and emergency vehicle (e.g., fire and medical) access and public services and utilities. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The Property is approximately 4.25 acres in size and can accommodate the Project, including adequate parking based upon Project’s anticipated parking demand as analyzed in the Linscott Law & Greenspan parking demand analysis and based upon the parking analysis contained in Section 5.5 Traffic/Circulation of the Lido House EIR. Additionally, the site also maintains a large, enhanced setback area comprising at least 20 percent of the site for public walkways, landscaping, and open space. 2. Implementation of the Project will include demolition of the former Fire Station No. 2 building and a reconfiguration of the driveway accessed from 32nd Street. The site will maintain direct access from 32nd Street and Newport Boulevard at the signalized intersection with Finley Avenue. 29 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 14 of 40 3. Adequate public and emergency vehicle access, public services, and utilities exist to accommodate the Project as concluded by the Lido House Hotel FEIR No. ER2014-003 (SCH#2013111022) (PA2013-217) and Addendum No. 2. The Project has also been reviewed and accepted in concept by the City Traffic Engineer and the Fire Department. Finding: I. Operation of the use at the location proposed would not be detrimental to the harmonious and orderly growth of the City, or endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The use has operated at this location for approximately four years and has not proven detrimental. The Project was also reviewed by the City’s Code Enforcement Division and Police Department with no objection. 2. The Project is expected to enhance the hotel by providing additional accommodations and amenities for visitors. Operational conditions of approval are included to help ensure the use maintains harmony with the surrounding area. 3. The use authorized by this Conditional Use Permit is not a nightclub and its prohibition will avoid potential land use conflicts, nuisances, and police intervention potentially associated with nightclubs. SECTION 4. DECISION. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: The Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach hereby recommends City Council approval and adoption of the following: 1. Addendum No. 2 to the Lido House Hotel Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2013111022) attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by reference. 2. General Plan Amendment No. GP2020-004 attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and incorporated herein by reference. 3. Local Coastal Program Amendment No. LC2020-006 attached hereto as Exhibit “D” and incorporated herein by reference. 4. Zoning Code Amendment No. CA2022-003 attached hereto as Exhibit “E” and incorporated herein by reference. 30 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 15 of 40 5. Site Development Review No. SD2020-008 and Conditional Use Permit No. UP2020- 039 based upon the findings above and subject to the conditions of approval attached as Exhibit “F” and incorporated herein by reference. If adopted by City Council and implemented by the Applicant, these approvals will replace and supersede the previous Site Development Review and Use Permits. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2022. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: BY:_________________________ Lauren Kleiman, Chairman BY:_________________________ Mark Rosene, Secretary Attachment(s) - Exhibit A – Legal Description Exhibit B – Addendum No. 2 to the Certified Final Lido House Hotel EIR Exhibit C – General Plan Amendment No. GP2020-004 Exhibit D – Local Coastal Program Amendment No. LC2020-006 Exhibit E – Zoning Code Amendment No. CA2022-003 Exhibit F – Conditions of Approval for Site Development Review No. SD2020-008 and Conditional Use Permit No. UP2020-039 Exhibit G – Approved Project Plans 31 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 16 of 40 EXHIBIT A Legal Description LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 1: THAT PORTION OF LOTS 3, 6 AND 7 IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT FILED IN THE DISTRICT LAND OFFICE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF "THE HUDSON" WITH THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 21 IN BLOCK 431 OF "LANCASTER'S ADDITION TO NEWPORT BEACH", AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 5, PAGE 14 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE NORTH 0'44'30" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY PROLONGATION 400.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND LOT 1 IN BLOCK "A" OF SAID LANCASTER'S ADDITION TO NEWPORT BEACH 461.53 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID CENTRAL AVENUE, AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 108, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 2, PAGES 1 OF SAID MISCELLANEOUS MAPS; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID CENTRAL AVENUE 401.79 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY OF SAID LOT 1 AND SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF "THE HUDSON" 495.33 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED ATTACHED TO THAT CERTAIN RESOLUTION NO. 3284 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF NEWPORT BEACH, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH RECORDED MARCH11, 1946 IN BOOK 1404, PAGE130 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 2 IN DEED TO THE GRIFFITH COMPANY RECORDED MARCH 23, 1948 IN BOOK 1741, PAGE 174 OF SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL 2: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2 IN BLOCK "A" OF "LANCASTER'S ADDITION TO NEWPORT BEACH", AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 5, PAGE 14 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF WASHINGTON AVENUE, NOW KNOWN AS 32ND STREET, TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THAT PORTION OF THE BULKHEAD LINE ESTABLISHED BY THE WAR DEPARTMENT IN 1936 AND SHOWN ON THE WAR DEPARTMENT MAP OF NEWPORT BAY SHOWING HARBOR LINE, EXTENDING BETWEEN BULKHEAD STATION NO.124 AND BULKHEAD STATION NO.125; THENCE NORTH 27'30'00" WEST ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF "THE HUDSON" AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP OF LANCASTER'S ADDITION; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID "THE HUDSON" TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF SAID BLOCK"A"; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS 1 AND 2 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 32 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 17 of 40 PARCEL 3: THAT PORTION OF LOT 3 OF TRACT NO. 1117, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 35, PAGES 48 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE 20.00 FOOT ALLEY AS VACATED BY RESOLUTION NO. 3280 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH RECORDED MARCH 11, 1946 IN BOOK 1400, PAGE 189 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE NORTH 0'44'30" WEST ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3, A DISTANCE OF 90.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 40'47'07" WEST 170.97 FEET TO A POINT IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID 20.00 FOOT ALLEY; THENCE SOUTH 0'44'30" EAST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID ALLEY 220.89 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF TRACT NO. 907, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 28, PAGES 25 TO 36 INCLUSIVE OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 89'15'30" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 907 AND SAID LOT 3, A DISTANCE OF 110.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 1 IN DEED TO THE GRIFFITH COMPANY RECORDED MARCH 23, 1948 IN BOOK 1741, PAGE 174 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE GRIFFITH COMPANY RECORDED JUNE 15, 1953 IN BOOK 2520, PAGE 577 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PARCEL 4: THAT PORTION OF LOT 3 OF TRACT NO. 1117, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 35, PAGE 48 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE NORTH 0'44'30" WEST 74.46 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 1 IN DEED TO THE GRIFFITH COMPANY RECORDED MARCH 23, 1948 IN BOOK 1741, PAGE 174 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 40'47'07" WEST ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LAND OF GRIFFITH COMPANY, A DISTANCE OF 69.945 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'15'30" EAST 45.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE SOUTH 0'44'30" EAST 53.54 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 5: LOTS ONE (2) AND TWO (2) IN BLOCK “A” OF “LANCASTER’S ADDITION TO NEWPORT BEACH’ AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORED IN BOOK 5, PAGE 14 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 33 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 18 of 40 EXHIBIT B Addendum No. 2 to the Certified Final Lido House Hotel EIR (The Final EIR, Addendum No. 1, and Addendum No. 2 are all available at www.newportbeachca.gov/CEQA within the “Lido House Hotel” folder due to size.) 34 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 19 of 40 EXHIBIT C General Plan Amendment No. GP2020-004 Amend Table LU1 to modify the “Visitor Serving Commercial – Lido Village—CV-LV” land use category as follows: Table LU1 Land Use Plan Categories Land Use Category Uses Density/ Intensity VISITOR SERVING COMMERCIAL – LIDO VILLAGE—CV-LV The CV-LV category is intended to allow for a range of accommodations (e.g. hotels, motels, hostels), goods, and services intended to primarily serve visitors to the City of Newport Beach. A fire station is allowed in its current location. Limited Use Overnight Visitor Accommodations and residences are not allowed As specified by Table LU2 Amend Table LU2 to modify Anomaly Number 85 as shown in the following table: Table LU2 Anomaly Locations Anomaly Number Statistical Area Land Use Designation Development Limit (sf) Development Limit (Other) Additional Information 85 B5 CV-LV 103,470 118,573 sf of hotel Accessory commercial floor area is allowed in conjunction with a hotel and it is included within the hotel development limit. Municipal facilities are not restricted or included in any development limit. 35 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 20 of 40 EXHIBIT D Local Coastal Program Amendment No. LC2020-006 Amend Table 2.1.1-1 of the Coastal Land Use Plan as follows: Table 2.1.1-1 Land Use Plan Categories Land Use Category Uses Density/Intensity CV-LV Visitor-Serving Commercial – Lido Village The CV-LV category is intended to allow for a range of accommodations (e.g. hotels, motels, hostels), goods, and services intended to primarily serve visitors to the City of Newport Beach. A fire station is allowed in its current location. Limited Use Overnight Visitor Accommodations and residences are not allowed. Note: The CV- LV (Visitor Serving Commercial - Lido Village) category applies to the former City Hall Complex that includeds Fire Station # 2 (3300 Newport Boulevard and 475 32nd Street). 103,470 118,573 gross square feet not including a fire station. A fire station may not occupy more than 10% of the total project site. Amend Policy 4.4.2-1 of the Coastal Land Use Plan as follows: 4.4.2-1. Maintain the 35-foot height limitation in the Shoreline Height Limitation Zone, as graphically depicted on Map 4-3, except for the following sites: A. Marina Park located at 1600 West Balboa Boulevard: A single, up to maximum 73-foot- tall faux lighthouse architectural tower, that creates an iconic landmark for the public to identify the site from land and water as a boating safety feature, may be allowed. No further exceptions to the height limit shall be allowed, including but not limited to, exceptions for architectural features, solar equipment or flag poles. Any architectural tower that exceeds the 35-foot height limit shall not include floor area above the 35-foot height limit, but shall house screened communications or emergency equipment, and shall be sited and designed to reduce adverse visual impacts and be compatible with the character of the area by among other things, incorporating a tapered design with a maximum diameter of 34-feet at the base of the tower. Public viewing opportunities shall be provided above the 35-feet, as feasible. (Resolution 2013-44) B. Former City Hall Complex at 3300 Newport Blvd and 475 32nd Street (the site): • At least 75% of the total area of the site shall be 35 feet in height or lower. • Buildings and structures up to 55 feet in height with the peaks of sloping roofs and elevator towers up to 60 feet in height, provided it is demonstrated that development does not adversely impact public views. 36 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 21 of 40 • Architectural features such as domes, towers, cupolas, spires, and similar structures may be up to 65 feet in height. • Buildings and structures over 35 feet in height, including architectural features, shall not occupy more than 25 percent of the total area of the site. • Buildings and structures over 45 feet in height, architectural features, shall not occupy more than 15 percent of the total area of the site. • With the exception of a fire station, aAll buildings and structures over 35 feet in height, including architectural features, shall be setback a minimum of 60 feet from the Newport Boulevard right-of-way and 70 feet from the 32nd Street right-of-way. • A fire station may be located in its current location and may be up to 40 feet in height. A fire station may include architectural features up to 45 feet in height to house and screen essential equipment. • The purpose of allowing limited exceptions to the 35-foot height limit on this site is to promote vertical clustering resulting in increased publiclypublically accessible on-site open space and architectural diversity while protecting existing coastal views and providing new coastal view opportunities. (Resolution 2016-29) Amend the row entitled “Side [Setbacks] (Street Side)” in Table 21.20-2 (Development Standards for Commercial Coastal Zoning Districts) of Section 21.20.030 (Commercial Coastal Zoning Districts General Development Standards) of Title 21 (Local Coastal Program Implementation Plan) of the NBMC to read as follows: TABLE 21.20-2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL COASTAL ZONING DISTRICTS Development Feature CC CG CM CN CV CV-LV OG Additional Requirements Side (Street side) 0 0 0 0 0 32nd Street: 1 ft. for below grade structures; 1 ft. for structures up to 35 ft. in height; 70 ft. for structures over 35 ft. in height (4)(5) Via Oporto: 0 15 ft. Amend the row entitled “Floor Area Ratio” in Table 21.20-2 (Development Standards for Commercial Coastal Zoning Districts) of Section 21.20.030 (Commercial Coastal Zoning 37 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 22 of 40 Districts General Development Standards) of Title 21 (Local Coastal Program Implementation Plan) of the NBMC to read as follows: TABLE 21.20-2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL COASTAL ZONING DISTRICTS Development Feature CC CG CM CN CV CV-LV OG Additional Requirements Floor Area Ratio (2)(3)(4) 0.75 0.75 0.50 0.30 1.50 103,470 118,573 sf (8) 1.30 Amend the rows related to “Height” in Table 21.20-2 (Development Standards for Commercial Coastal Zoning Districts) of Section 21.20.023 (Commercial Coastal Zoning Districts General Development Standards) of Title 21 (Local Coastal Program Implementation Plan) of the NBMC to read as follows: TABLE 21.20-2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL COASTAL ZONING DISTRICTS Development Feature CC CG CM CN CV CV-LV OG Additional Requirements Height Maximum allowable height of structures without discretionary approval. See Section 21.30.060 (Height Limits and Exceptions) for height measurement requirements. See Section 21.30.060(C) (Increase in Height Limit) for possible increase in height limit. Within Shoreline Height Limit Zone 26 ft. with flat roof; less than 3/12 pitch 31 ft. with sloped roof; 3/12 or greater pitch 55 ft. with flat roof, less than 3/12 roof pitch; 60 ft. with sloped roof, 3/12 roof pitch or greater (5)(6)(7) 55 ft. with flat roof, less than 3/12 roof pitch; 60 ft. with sloped roof, 3/12 roof pitch or greater (6)(7) 26 ft. with flat roof; less than 3/12 pitch 31 ft. with sloped roof; 3/12 or greater pitch Section 21.30.06 0 See CLUP Policy 4.4.2-1 Not within Shoreline Height Limit Zone 32 ft. with flat roof; less than 3/12 pitch 37 ft. with sloped roof; 3/12 or greater pitch N/A N/A 32 ft. with flat roof; less than 3/12 pitch 37 ft. with sloped roof; 3/12 or greater pitch 38 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 23 of 40 TABLE 21.20-2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL COASTAL ZONING DISTRICTS Development Feature CC CG CM CN CV CV-LV OG Additional Requirements Within High Rise Height Area (See Figure H-1, attached to the ordinance codified in this Implementatio n Plan). 300 ft. N/A N/A 300 ft. Amend the footnotes for Table 21.20-2 (Development Standards for Commercial Coastal Zoning Districts) of Section 21.20.020 (Commercial Coastal Zoning Districts General Development Standards) of Title 21 (Local Coastal Program Implementation Plan) of the NBMC to read as follows: Notes: (1) All development and the subdivision of land shall comply with the requirements of Section 21.30.025 (Coastal Zone Subdivisions). (2) In the CG Coastal Zoning District, when 0.3/0.5 is shown on the Coastal Zoning Map, the FAR may be increased to a maximum of 0.5 when two or more legal lots are merged to accommodate larger commercial development projects. (3) Portions of legal lots that are submerged lands or tidelands shall be included in the land area of the lot for the purpose of calculating the allowable floor area for structures. (4) The specific floor area limitations for each coastal zoning district are identified on the Coastal Zoning Map. (5) Setbacks to 32nd Street do not apply to Fire Station No. 2. (5)(6) Architectural features such as domes, towers, cupolas, spires, and similar structures may be up to sixty-five (65) feet in height. (7) Fire Station No. 2 may be up to forty (40) feet in height and may include architectural features up to forty-five (45) feet in height to house and screen essential equipment. (8) One hundred three thousand four hundred seventy (103,470) gross square feet not including a fire station. A fire station may not occupy more than ten (10) percent of the total project site. Amend Subsection (D)(15) of Section 21.30.060 (Height Limits and Exceptions) of Title 21 (Local Coastal Program Implementation Plan) of the NBMC to read as follows: 15. Lido House Hotel. At the former City Hall, 3300 Newport Boulevard and 475 32nd Street: 39 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 24 of 40 a. At least seventy-five (75) percent of the total area of the site shall be thirty-five (35) feet in height or lower. b. Buildings and structures up to fifty-five (55) feet in height with the peaks of sloping roofs and elevator towers up to sixty (60) feet in height provided it is demonstrated that development does not adversely materially impact public views. c. Architectural features such as domes, towers, cupolas, spires, and similar structures may be up to sixty-five (65) feet in height. d. Buildings and structures over thirty-five (35) feet in height, including architectural features, shall not occupy more than twenty-five (25) percent of the total area of the site. e. Buildings and structures over forty-five (45) feet in height, including architectural features, shall not occupy more than fifteen (15) percent of the total area of the site. f. With the exception of a fire station, aAll buildings and structures over thirty-five (35) feet in height, including architectural features, shall be set back a minimum of sixty (60) feet from the Newport Boulevard right-of-way and seventy (70) feet from the 32nd Street right-of-way. g. A fire station may be located in its current location and may be up to forty (40) feet in height. h. A fire station may include architectural features up to forty-five (45) feet in height to house and screen essential equipment. 40 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 25 of 40 EXHIBIT E Zoning Code Amendment No. CA2022-003 Amend Section 20.14.010 (Zoning Map Adopted by Reference) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code (NBMC) to modify Anomaly Number 85 as follows: Anomaly Number Development Limit (sf) Development Limit (Other) Additional Information 85 103,470 118,573 sf of hotel Accessory commercial floor area is allowed in conjunction with a hotel and it is included within the hotel development limit. Municipal facilities are not restricted or included in any development limit. Amend the row entitled “Setbacks” in Table 2-7 (Development Standards for Commercial Retail Zoning Districts) of Section 20.20.030 (Commercial Zoning Districts General Development Standards) of Title 20 (Planning and Zoning) of the NBMC to read as follows: TABLE 2-7 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL RETAIL ZONING DISTRICTS Development Feature CC CG CM CN CV CV-LV Additional Requirements Setbacks Minimum setbacks required for primary structures. See Section 20.30.110(D) (Allowed Encroachments into Setback Areas) for setback measurement, allowed projections into setbacks, and exceptions. Front 0 0 0 0 0 Newport Blvd: 1 ft. for below grade structures; 20 ft. for structures up to 35 ft. in height; 60 ft. for structures over 35 ft. in height Side (interior, each): Abutting nonresidential 0 0 0 0 0 1 ft. for below grade structures; 5 ft. for above grade structures Abutting residential 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 41 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 26 of 40 TABLE 2-7 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL RETAIL ZONING DISTRICTS Development Feature CC CG CM CN CV CV-LV Additional Requirements Side (Street side) 0 0 0 0 0 32nd Street: 1 ft. for below grade structures; 1 ft. for structures up to 35 ft. in height; 70 ft. for structures over 35 ft. in height (4) Via Oporto: 0 Rear: Abutting an alley 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 5 ft. Not abutting an alley 0 0 0 0 0 0 Abutting residential 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. Amend the row entitled “Height” in Table 2-7 (Development Standards for Commercial Retail Zoning Districts) of Section 20.20.030 (Commercial Zoning Districts General Development Standards) of Title 20 (Planning and Zoning) of the NBMC to read as follows: TABLE 2-7 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL RETAIL ZONING DISTRICTS Development Feature CC CG CM CN CV CV-LV Additional Requirements Height Maximum allowable height of structures without discretionary approval. See Section 20.30.060 (Height Limits and Exceptions) for height measurement requirements. See Section 20.30.060(C) (Increase in Height Limit) for possible increase in height limit. Within Shoreline Height Limit Zone 26 ft. with flat roof; less than 3/12 pitch 31 ft. with sloped roof; 3/12 or greater pitch 55 ft. with flat roof, less than 3/12 roof pitch; 60 ft. with sloped roof, 3/12 roof pitch or greater (4)(5)(6) 20.30.060 See CLUP Policy 4.4.2- 1 Not within Shoreline Height Limit Zone 32 ft. with flat roof; less than 3/12 pitch N/A 42 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 27 of 40 TABLE 2-7 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL RETAIL ZONING DISTRICTS Development Feature CC CG CM CN CV CV-LV Additional Requirements 37 ft. with sloped roof; 3/12 or greater pitch Within High Rise Height Area (See Figure H-1, attached to the ordinance codified in this title). 300 N/A Amend the footnotes for Table 2-7 (Development Standards for Commercial Retail Zoning Districts) of Section 20.20.030 (Commercial Zoning Districts General Development Standards) of Title 20 (Planning and Zoning) of the NBMC to read as follows: Notes: (1) All development and the subdivision of land shall comply with the requirements of Title 19 (Subdivisions). (2) In the CG Zoning District, when 0.3/0.5 is shown on the Zoning Map, the FAR may be increased to a maximum of 0.5 when two or more legal lots are merged to accommodate larger commercial development projects in compliance with General Plan Policy LU 6.19.13 and Title 19 (Subdivisions). (3) Portions of legal lots that are submerged lands or tidelands shall be included in the land area of the lot for the purpose of calculating the allowable floor area for structures. (4) Setbacks to 32nd Street do not apply to Fire Station No. 2. (4)(5) Architectural features such as domes, towers, cupolas, spires, and similar structures may be up to 65 feet in height. (6) Fire Station No. 2 may be up to 40 feet in height and may include architectural features up to 45 feet in height to house and screen essential equipment. 43 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 28 of 40 EXHIBIT F Conditions of Approval Site Development Review No. SD2020-008 Conditional Use Permit No. UP2020-039 Planning Division 1. The Project shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plans attached as Exhibit G of this Resolution except as modified by applicable conditions of approval. 2. Site Development Review No. SD2020-008 and Conditional Use Permit No. UP2020- 039 shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval of a Coastal Development Permit unless an extension is otherwise granted by the Community Development Director or the Planning Commission by referral or appeal. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, approval from the California Coastal Commission is required. 4. The Project is subject to all applicable City ordinances, policies, and standards, unless specifically waived or modified by the conditions of approval. 5. All development shall be implemented in compliance with all mitigation measures contained within the approved Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program of the Lido House Hotel, Final Environmental Impact Report No. ER2014-003 (SCH#2013111022). 6. The Applicant shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws. Violation of any of those laws in connection with the use may be cause for modification or revocation of Site Development Review No. SD2020-008 and Conditional Use Permit No. UP2020- 039. 7. Approval of this Site Development Review and Conditional Use Permit authorize a hotel which is intended for occupancy by transients for dwelling, lodging, or sleeping purposes for periods of thirty (30) days or less. The selling of timeshares or any other form of fractional ownership of the hotel shall be prohibited. Additionally, no portion of the hotel shall be rented or otherwise used for residential purposes. 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall pay any unpaid administrative costs associated with the processing of this application to the Planning Division. 9. A copy of the Resolution approving Site Development Review No. SD2020-008 and Conditional Use Permit No. UP2020-039, including the conditions of approval within Exhibit “A” shall be incorporated into the final approved Building Division and field sets of plans prior to issuance of the building permits. 10. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall submit a landscape and 44 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 29 of 40 irrigation plan prepared by a licensed landscape architect. These plans shall incorporate drought tolerant plantings and water efficient irrigation practices, and the plans shall be approved by the Planning Department and the Municipal Operations Department. All planting areas shall be provided with a permanent underground automatic sprinkler irrigation system of a design suitable for the type and arrangement of the plant materials selected. The irrigation system shall be adjustable based upon either a signal from a satellite or an on-site moisture-sensor. Planting areas adjacent to vehicular activity shall be protected by a continuous concrete curb or similar permanent barrier. Landscaping shall be located so as not to impede vehicular sight distance to the satisfaction of the Traffic Engineer. 11. All landscape materials and landscaped areas shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the approved landscape plan. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and growing condition and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing and trimming. All landscaped areas shall be kept free of weeds and debris. All irrigation systems shall be kept operable, including adjustments, replacements, repairs, and cleaning as part of regular maintenance. 12. Reclaimed water shall be used whenever available, assuming it is economically feasible. 13. Water leaving the project site due to over-irrigation of landscape shall be minimized. If an incident such as this is reported, a representative from the Code and Water Quality Enforcement Division of the City Manager’s Office shall visit the location, investigate, inform and notice the responsible party, and, as appropriate, cite the responsible party and/or shut off the irrigation water. 14. Watering shall be done during the early morning or evening hours (between 4 p.m. and 9 a.m.) to minimize evaporation the following morning. 15. Water shall not be used to clean paved surfaces such as sidewalks, driveways, parking areas, etc. except to alleviate immediate safety or sanitation hazards. Parking areas and vehicular driveways shall be swept on a weekly basis. 16. Prior to the final of building permits, the Applicant shall schedule an inspection by the Planning Division to confirm that all landscaping was installed in accordance with the approved plan. 17. All proposed signs shall be in conformance with applicable provisions of the Zoning Code and shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer if located adjacent to the vehicular ingress and egress. The final location of the signs shall be reviewed by the City Traffic Engineer and shall conform to City Standard 110-L to ensure that adequate sight distance is provided. All signs shall be architecturally compatible and made with high quality, durable materials. Cabinet signs are prohibited. 18. Lighting shall be in compliance with applicable standards of the Zoning Code. Exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and confined within site boundaries. No direct rays or glare are permitted to shine onto public streets or adjacent sites or create a public nuisance. “Walpak” type fixtures are not permitted. Parking area lighting shall have zero 45 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 30 of 40 cut-off fixtures and light standards shall not exceed 20 feet in height. 19. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall prepare a photometric study in conjunction with a final lighting plan for approval by the Planning Division. 20. The Property shall be illuminated for security and the site shall not be excessively illuminated based on the luminance recommendations of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, or, if in the opinion of the Community Development Director, the illumination creates an unacceptable negative nuisance to surrounding property. The Community Development Director may order the dimming of light sources or other remediation upon finding that the site is excessively illuminated. 21. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, the Applicant shall schedule an evening inspection by the Planning Division to confirm control of light and glare as required by applicable provisions of the Zoning Code and the conditions of approval. 22. The operator of the facility shall be responsible for the control of noise generated by the subject facility including, but not limited to, noise generated by patrons and any events conducted on the project site, food service operations, delivery/loading operations, and mechanical equipment. All noise generated by the proposed use shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 10.26 and other applicable noise control requirements of the Newport Beach Municipal Code 23. All mechanical equipment shall be screened from view of consistent with the Zoning Code and shall be sound attenuated in accordance with Chapter 10.26 of the NBMC, Community Noise Control. 24. Trash receptacles for patrons shall be conveniently located both inside and outside of the facility and shall be routinely emptied. All trash shall be stored within the building or within trash bins stored within trash enclosure(s). 25. The exterior of the business shall be maintained free of litter and graffiti at all times. The owner or operator shall provide for daily removal of trash, litter debris and graffiti from the premises and on all abutting sidewalks within 20 feet of the premises as necessary. 26. Storage of any materials outside of the buildings or in parking areas property shall be prohibited. 27. The trash enclosure shall accommodate a minimum of four, 4-foot by 6-foot trash bins and shall include doors and a roof structure to screen the contents of the enclosure. The Applicant shall ensure that the trash dumpsters and/or receptacles are maintained to control odors. This may include the provision of either fully self-contained dumpsters or periodic steam cleaning of the dumpsters, if deemed necessary by the Planning Division. 28. The construction and equipment staging areas shall be located in the least visually prominent area on the site and shall be properly maintained and/or screened to minimize potential unsightly conditions. 46 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 31 of 40 29. A six-foot-high screen and security fence shall be placed around the construction site during construction. Construction equipment and materials shall be properly stored on the site when not in use. 30. Traffic control and truck route plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department before implementation. Large construction vehicles shall not be permitted to travel narrow streets as determined by the Public Works Department. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and flagman. 31. Construction activities which produce loud noise that disturb, or could disturb a person of normal sensitivity who works or resides in the vicinity, shall be limited to the weekdays between the hours of 7 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. No such noise occurrences shall occur at any time on Saturdays, Sundays or federal holidays. 32. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Applicant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its City Council, its boards and commissions, officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses (including without limitation, attorney’s fees, disbursements and court costs) of every kind and nature whatsoever which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to City’s approval of the Lido House Hotel Expansion including, but not limited to, the General Plan Amendment No. GP2020-004, Local Coastal Program Amendment No. LC2020-006, Zoning Code Amendment No. CA2022-003, Site Development Review No. SD2020-008, Conditional Use Permit No. UP2020-039; and/or the City's related California Environmental Quality Act determinations and the certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report No. ER2014-003 (SCH#2013111022) and Addendum No. 2. This indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, damages awarded against the City, if any, costs of suit, attorneys' fees, and other expenses incurred in connection with such claim, action, causes of action, suit or proceeding whether incurred by Applicant, City, and/or the parties initiating or bringing such proceeding. The Applicant shall indemnify the City for all of City's costs, attorneys' fees, and damages which City incurs in enforcing the indemnification provisions set forth in this condition. The Applicant shall pay to the City upon demand any amount owed to the City pursuant to the indemnification requirements prescribed in this condition. Applicant shall not be required to indemnify the City from any lawsuit, or damages, costs, attorneys’ fees, or other expenses related thereto, that is brought by any person or entity that is currently a party to litigation initiated by the City related to the former city hall site, including the former Fire Station No. 2 site. Building Division 33. The Applicant is required to obtain all applicable permits from the City’s Building Division and Fire Department for demolition and construction. The construction plans must comply with the most recent, City-adopted version of the California Building Code. The construction plans must meet all applicable State Disabilities Access requirements. The construction plans must comply with the California Green Building Standards Code. 34. A grading bond shall be required prior to grading permit issuance. 47 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 32 of 40 35. A geotechnical report shall be submitted to the Building Division for review prior to grading permit issuance. 36. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with the General Permit for Construction Activities shall be prepared, submitted to the State Water Quality Control Board for approval and made part of the construction program. The project Applicant will provide the City with a copy of the NOI and their application check as proof of filing with the State Water Quality Control Board. This plan will detail measures and practices that will be in effect during construction to minimize the project’s impact on water quality. 37. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Applicant shall prepare and submit a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the proposed project, subject to the approval of the Building Department and Code and Water Quality Enforcement Division. The WQMP shall provide appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs) to ensure that no violations of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements occur. 38. A drainage and hydrology study shall be submitted prior to grading permit issuance. 39. A wheelchair-accessible path of travel shall be provided from Finley Avenue, Newport Boulevard, and 32nd Street including public transportation areas to all guest rooms and facilities. Proposed wood shingles shall be Class A. 40. Fire Sprinkler System shall be Type 13. Fire Department 41. The Applicant shall provide an exiting analysis for all new assembly spaces. 42. New buildings shall have approved radio coverage for emergency responders within the building based on the existing coverage levels of the public safety communication systems utilized by the jurisdiction, measured at the exterior of the building. This section shall not require improvement of the existing public safety communication systems. If the existing structure has an emergency responder radio coverage system, the addition shall be accounted for and improvement shall be made to the system unless testing by a third party determines that it is not required. 43. A fire flow determination consistent with Newport Beach Fire Department Guideline B.01 “Determination of Required Fire Flow” shall be required for the proposed buildings prior to the issuance of a building permit. The fire flow information shall be included on final building drawings. 44. All weather access roads shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during time of construction. 45. Fire hydrants shall be required to be located within 400 feet of all portions of the building subject to the review and approval of the Newport Beach Fire Department. Additional 48 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 33 of 40 hydrants may be required dependent on fire flow calculations. All existing and proposed fire hydrants within 400 feet of the project site shall be shown on the final site plan. 46. Blue hydrant identification markers shall be placed adjacent to fire hydrants consistent with Newport Beach Fire Department guidelines. 47. A fire apparatus access road shall be provided to within 150 feet of all exterior walls of the first floor of the building. The route of the fire apparatus access road shall be approved by the Fire Department. The 150 feet is measured by means of an unobstructed route around the exterior of the building. Newport Beach Fire Department Guideline C.01 “Emergency Fire Access: Roadways, Fire Lanes, Gates and Barriers.” 48. Minimum width of a fire access roadway shall be 20 feet, no vehicle parking allowed. The width shall be increased to 26 feet within 30 feet of a hydrant, no vehicle parking allowed. Access roads shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet, 6 inches. Newport Beach Fire Department Guideline C.01. 49. Apparatus access roads must be constructed of a material that provides an all weather driving surface and capable of supporting 72,000 pounds imposed load for fire apparatus and truck outrigger loads of 75 pounds per square inch over a two foot area. Calculations stamped and signed by a registered professional engineer shall certify that the proposed surface meets the criteria of an all weather driving surface and is capable of withstanding the weight of 72,000 pounds, Newport Beach Fire Department Guideline C.01. 50. Vehicle access gates or barriers installed across fire apparatus access roads shall be in accordance with the Newport Beach Fire Department Guidelines and Standards C.01 “Emergency Fire Access: Roadways, Fire Lanes, Gates, and Barriers.” The minimum width of any gate or opening necessary or required as a point of access shall be not less than 14 feet unobstructed width. As amended by Newport Beach, California Fire Code Section 503.6.1. 51. All security gates shall have a Knox-box override and an approved remote opening device. Newport Beach Fire Department Guideline C.01. 52. Fire lanes shall be identified as per Newport Beach Fire Department Guideline C.02. 53. An automatic fire sprinkler system will be required and shall be installed as per California Fire Code Section 903. 54. The underground fire line will be reviewed by the fire department. A separate submittal is required which requires an “F” Permit. The underground fire line is a separate submittal (cannot be part of the overhead fire sprinkler plans, nor precise or rough grading plans) and must be designed as per N.B.F.D. Guideline F.04 “Private Hydrants and Sprinkler Supply Line Underground Piping.” 55. Standpipes systems shall be provided as set forth in California Fire Code Section 905. 49 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 34 of 40 56. Hood Fire Suppression system will be required for cooking appliances and plans must be submitted to the fire department for approval prior to installation. 57. A fire alarm system will be required and shall be installed as per California Fire Code Section 907. 58. Fire extinguishers are required and shall be located and sized as per the California Fire Code. 59. Emergency power shall be provided for exit signs as required in Section 1013.6.3. The system shall be capable of powering the required load for a duration of not less than 90 minutes. 60. Public Safety Radio System Coverage (800 MHz firefighter’s radio system) shall be provided as per Newport Beach Fire Department Guideline D.05. 61. Premises identification shall be provided as City of Newport Beach amended California Fire Code Section 505.1.1. Addresses shall be placed above or immediately adjacent to all doors that allow fire department access. In no case shall the numbers be less than four inches in height with a one-half inch stroke. 62. Fireplaces and fire pit clearances shall be provided as per manufacturer’s recommendations and/or California Mechanical Code requirements. 63. Awnings and canopies shall be designed and installed as per California Building Code Section 3105 with frames of noncombustible material, fire-retardant-treated wood, wood of Type IV size, or 1-hour construction with combustible or noncombustible covers and shall be either fixed, retractable, folding or collapsible. 64. All building and structures with one or more passenger service elevators shall be provided with not less than one medical emergency service elevator to all landings. The medical emergency service elevator shall accommodate the loading and transport of an ambulance gurney or stretcher 24 inches by 84 inches with not less than 5-inch radius corner in the horizontal position. The elevator car shall be of such a size to accommodate a 24-inch by 84-inch ambulance gurney or stretcher with not less than 5- inch radius corners, in the horizontal, open position, shall be provided with a minimum clear distance between walls or between walls and door excluding return panels not less than 80 inches by 54 inches and a minimum distance from wall to return panel not less than 51 inches with a 42-inch side slide door as per California Building Code Section 3002. 65. Fire Master Plan shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Division for approval. The plan shall include information on the following (but not limited to) subjects: fire department vehicle access to the project site, secondary emergency vehicle access, firefighter access (hose pull) around structures, fire lane identification, location of fire hydrants and other fire department appliances, and the location and type of gates or barriers that restrict ingress/egress. 50 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 35 of 40 66. Building permit plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for plan check and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. Public Works Department 67. All improvements shall be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 68. An encroachment permit is required for all work activities and all non-standard improvements within the public right-of-way and public property. 69. Prior to building permit issuance, a final Construction Management Plan (CMP) shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director and City Traffic Engineer. 70. Prior to building permit issuance, a final Parking Management Plan (PMP) shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director and City Traffic Engineer. 71. The Applicant shall be required to construct fourteen (14) new public parking spaces along Via Oporto and shall coordinate with the City’s Finance Department for the installation of parking meters and/or pay stations and signage. 72. All landscaping along Via Oporto adjacent to the fourteen (14) public parking spaces shall be maintained by the Applicant. 73. The reconfigured driveway approach along the 32nd Street frontage shall be constructed per City Standard. 74. The Applicant shall construct new planned improvements along 32nd Street between Newport Boulevard and Lafayette Avenue, including but not limited to, sidewalk, curb/gutter, striping, signage, driveway, street light relocation, parking meter post relocation, and roadway improvement. All work shall be per City Standards and approved by the Public Works Director. The cost shall be borne by the Applicant. 75. The public pedestrian easement along Newport Boulevard shall be a minimum of 8 feet in width and clear of any obstructions, unless otherwise approved by the Public Works and the Community Development Departments. 76. The Applicant shall reconstruct the existing broken and/or otherwise damaged concrete sidewalk panels, curb and gutter, and driveway approaches along the Newport Boulevard and 32nd Street frontages. 77. All existing curb ramps along the project frontages shall be upgraded to current ADA standards. 78. All improvements shall comply with the City’s sight distance requirement. The project driveways shall be designed to accommodate adequate vehicular sight distance per City 51 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 36 of 40 Standard 105. Walls, signs, and other obstructions shall be limited to 30 inches in height and planting shall be limited to 24 inches in height within the limited use areas. 79. In case of damage done to public improvements surrounding the development site by the private construction, additional reconstruction within the public right-of-way could be required at the discretion of the Public Works Inspector. 80. All on-site drainage shall comply with the latest City Water Quality requirements. 81. All unused water services to be abandoned shall be capped at the main (corporation stop) and all unused sewer laterals to be abandoned shall be capped at property line. 82. All new and existing water services (i.e., domestic, landscaping, or fire) shall have its own water meter and shall be protected by a City approved backflow assembly. 83. All new and existing sewer laterals shall have a sewer cleanout installed per STD-406- L. 84. Water and Wastewater demand studies shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval prior to approval of the Grading Plan. If studies show that there are impacts based on the peak demand flows calculated, improvements to the City’s infrastructures will be required at the cost of the development. 85. All parking stalls and drive aisle widths shall be per City Standards 805-L-A and 805-L- B. 86. A Valet Operations Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Traffic Engineer and the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Future changes to the plan shall also require the review and approval. 87. All valet operation shall be accommodated on-site at all times. 88. Tandem parking spaces shall be signed and used for valet parking only. They may be used for long-term reserved parking. They shall not be used for public parking. 89. All landscaping, hardscape, ground cover, and trees within the project site and along the Finley Avenue, Newport Boulevard, and 32nd Street frontages shall be maintained by the Applicant. 90. Remove pendant lighting along Finley Avenue to provide adequate vertical clearance. Police Department 91. State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control license types classified as “Public Premises” shall be prohibited. 92. If required by the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, the Applicant shall provide the Chief of Police a statement of facts showing why the issuance of alcohol licenses for the proposed project would serve public convenience or necessity. 52 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 37 of 40 93. Approval of this Site Development Review and Conditional Use Permit does not permit the hotel or its restaurants, bars, lounge, or assembly areas to operate as a nightclub as defined by the Newport Beach Municipal Code, unless the Planning Commission first approves such permit. 94. Prior to final inspection of the building permit, the operator shall obtain an Operator License pursuant to Chapter 5.25 (Operator License) of the NBMC, unless it is determined the Operator License is not required. The Operator License may be subject to additional and/or more restrictive conditions to regulate and control potential late-hour nuisances associated with the operation facility. 95. Prior to occupancy and operation of the proposed hotel and its ancillary uses, a comprehensive security plan shall be submitted to the Newport Beach Police Department for review and approval. 96. There shall be no exterior advertising or signs of any kind or type, including advertising directed to the exterior from within, promoting or indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages. Interior displays of alcoholic beverages or signs which are clearly visible to the exterior shall constitute a violation of this condition. 97. No “happy hour” type of reduced price alcoholic beverage promotion shall be allowed except when offered in conjunction with food ordered from the a full service menu. 98. No games or contests requiring or involving the consumption of alcoholic beverages shall be permitted. 99. All persons selling alcoholic beverages shall be over the age of 21 and undergo and successfully complete a certified training program in responsible methods and skills for selling alcoholic beverages. The certified program must meet the standards of the California Coordinating Council on Responsible Beverage Service or other certifying/licensing body, which the State may designate. Records of each owner’s, manager’s and employee’s successful completion of the required certified training program shall be maintained on the premises and shall be presented upon request by a representative of the City of Newport Beach. 100. The operator of the facility shall be responsible for the control of noise generated by the subject facility including, but not limited to, noise generated by patrons, food service operations, and mechanical equipment. All noise generated by the proposed use shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 10.26 and other applicable noise control requirements of the NBMC. Pre-recorded music may be played in the tenant space, provided exterior noise levels outlined below are not exceeded. The noise generated by the proposed use shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 10.26 (Community Noise Control) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. 101. That no outdoor sound system, loudspeakers, or paging system shall be permitted in conjunction with the hotel, hotel restaurant or lounge facility. 53 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 38 of 40 102. The operator is required to take reasonable steps to discourage and correct objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance within the facility, adjacent properties, or surrounding public areas, sidewalks, or parking lots of the restaurant, during business hours, if directly related to the patrons of the establishment surrounding residents. 103. No alcoholic beverages shall be consumed on any property adjacent to the licensed premises under the control of the licensee. 104. A Special Events Permit is required for any event or promotional activity outside the normal operational characteristics of the approved use, as conditioned, or that would attract large crowds, involve the sale of alcoholic beverages, include any form of on-site media broadcast, or any other activities as specified in the NBMC to require such permits. 105. There shall be no on-site radio, televisions, video, film, or other electronic media broadcasts, including recordings to be broadcasted at a later time, which include the service of alcoholic beverages, without first obtaining an approved Special Event Permit issued by the City of Newport Beach. 106. Any event or activity staged by an outside promoter or entity, where the Applicant, operator, owner or his employees or representatives share in any profits, or pay any percentage or commission to a promoter or any other person based upon money collected as a door charge, cover charge or any other form of admission charge is prohibited. 107. The operator of the establishment shall not share any profits or pay any percentage or commission to a promoter or any other person based upon monies collected as a door charge, cover charge, or any other form of admission charge, including minimum drink orders or the sale of drink. Real Property Manager 108. Prior to building permit issuance, the Applicant shall work with the City’s Real Property Manager to modify the proposed landscaping around the greenhouse area, such that it does not restrict use of the surrounding area for events. 109. Prior to building permit issuance, the Applicant shall work with the City’s Real Property Manager to enhance the western wall of the new breakout room by considering adding transom windows or some similar feature that breaks up the wall massing. 110. Prior to building permit issuance, the Applicant shall work with the City’s Real Property Manager to ensure that adequate pedestrian paths of travel are provided connecting the hotel to the sidewalk and new public parking along Via Oporto. 111. Prior to building permit issuance, the Applicant shall pursue and execute a lease amendment. 54 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 39 of 40 112. The gates proposed for access through the new fencing along Newport Boulevard shall be removable and shall only be put in place during events. The pedestrian walkway shall always be freely open and accessible when an event is not occurring. 55 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2022-020 Page 40 of 40 EXHIBIT G Approved Project Plans 56 57 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE58 Attachment No. PC 2 Applicant’s Project Narrative 59 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE60 Planning Permit Application Attachment A Page 1 of 6 CUP No. 2020-39; SDR No. 2020-008; GPA No. 2020-004; LCPA No. 2020-006, JUne 15, 2022 - LHE PA2020-068 Application Resubmittal The Applicant requests the following amendments to the previously approved Site Development Review No. SD2016-005, Conditional Use Permit No. UP2016-015, General Plan Amendment No. GP2016-001, and Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment No. LC2016-001: A. To increase the maximum allowed gross floor area from 103,470 gross square feet to 118,573 gross square feet; B. Amend Conditional Use Permit No. UP2016-015; and C. Amend Site Development Review No. SD2016-005 Project Description A. The Applicant requests a 15,103 +/- square foot increase in the maximum allowable development of the site from 103,470 square feet to 118,573 square feet for Lido House Hotel. Additionally, Applicant propose to incorporate the adjacent parcel into the lease premises to accommodate additional site parking. The proposed changes to the approved hotel plans in current lease premises: a. Addition of 5 Cottages with a total of +/- 8,351 total square feet. b. Enclosure of 1,466 square feet of storage spaces on level 1. c. Addition of 3,481 square feet of covered walkway, pre-function and break out meeting room for splitting a large group into smaller groups on level 1. d. Addition of 600 square feet greenhouse break-out sitting room on level 1. e. Addition of 819 total square feet of guest room space for Levels 2, 3, and 4 (273 square feet each). f. Enclosure of 386 square foot of rooftop terrace area on Level 4. 61 Planning Permit Application Attachment A Page 2 of 6 CUP No. 2020-39; SDR No. 2020-008; GPA No. 2020-004; LCPA No. 2020-006, JUne 15, 2022 - LHE PA2020-068 Application Resubmittal Required Findings for Site Development Review No. 2020-008 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-039 Site Development Review Finding: 1. Allowed within the subject Zoning district; Facts in Support of Finding: a. The site is within the Visitor Servicing Commercial – Lido Village (CV-LV) zoning district and Section 20.20.020 allows visitor accommodations subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. 2. In compliance with all of the following applicable criteria: a. Compliance with this Section, the General Plan, this Zoning Code, any applicable specific plan, and other applicable criteria and policies related to the use or structure; Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The existing 130-room hotel project is consistent with the CV-LV General Plan land use designation, CV-LV Coastal Land Use Plan category, and the CV-LV zoning district for the project site that provides for the horizontal or vertical intermixing of commercial, visitor accommodations, residential, and/or civic uses. Civic uses could include, but are not limited to, a community center, public plazas, a fire station and/or public parking. b. The efficient arrangement of structures on the site and the harmonious relationship of the structures to one another and to other adjacent developments; and whether the relationship is based on standards of good design; Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The CV-LV zoning district includes setback standards (zero to 35 feet depending on height), open space (20% of the site) and building height standards (55 feet to flat roofs, 60 feet for sloping roofs and up to 65 feet for architectural features and structures must be kept below 35 feet within 70 feet horizontal distance from 32nd Street). The proposed Cottages, Greenhouse Sitting Room, and Break-Out Room will be setback more than 45 feet and more than 15 feet from 32nd street respectively. The height of the sloping roof of the 4-story portion of the proposed hotel is less than 58 feet, 5 inches and all other portions of the hotel are below this height. The height of the Cottages will be kept below 35 feet in areas within 70 feet horizontally from 32nd Street. Lastly, the proposed site plan provides over 20% of the site as open space consisting of the hardscape and landscaping between the hotel and Newport Boulevard and 32nd Street in compliance with the proposed open space standard. 62 Planning Permit Application Attachment A Page 3 of 6 CUP No. 2020-39; SDR No. 2020-008; GPA No. 2020-004; LCPA No. 2020-006, JUne 15, 2022 - LHE PA2020-068 Application Resubmittal c. The compatibility in terms of bulk, scale, and aesthetic treatment of structures on the site and adjacent developments and public areas; Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The project is compatible with surrounding development and public spaces in terms of bulk, scale and aesthetic treatments. The existing building is setback over 69 feet from Newport Boulevard. . The proposed cottages are over 69 feet from Newport Boulevard. The proposed greenhouse sitting room is designed to fit the coastal architectural theme. It is set back over 45 feet from Newport Boulevard and has a height of 14 feet 6 inches. Hotel buildings have been designed with a one, two and three story element along Newport Boulevard while providing a significant setback from the street providing areas for public access, landscaping, outdoor dining, and hotel use. Based upon the project drawings, all elevations of proposed buildings will include consistent architectural treatments, articulation and modulation of building masses providing visual interest with a coastal architectural theme specified by the Lido Village Design Guidelines. d. The adequacy, efficiency, and safety of pedestrian and vehicular access, including drive aisles, driveways, and parking and loading spaces; 1. The project retains the two large Ficus trees designated by Council Policy G-1 as Landmark Trees. The proposed project also retains the 10 existing tall date palm trees, and provides pedestrian areas, seating areas, and enhanced pavement increasing the aesthetic and use qualities of the setback area. The setback area also provides pedestrian connections from the intersection of Newport Boulevard and 32nd Street along the streets in furtherance of the goals of the Lido Village Design Guidelines. Lastly, the building elevations include a lighthouse architectural feature, simple gable roofs, tight overhangs, simple block massing, and wood siding all with a clear coastal theme consistent with the Lido Village Design Guidelines. 2. Access to the site, on-site circulation, and parking areas are designed to provide standard-sized parking spaces consistent with the Zoning Code, 26-foot-wide, two-way driveways, and the minimum vehicle turning radius to accommodate and provide safe access for residents and guests (including the disabled), emergency vehicles, delivery trucks, and refuse collections vehicles, as determined by the City Traffic Engineer. e. The adequacy and efficiency of landscaping and open space areas and the use of water efficient plant and irrigation materials. The protection of significant views from public right(s)-of-way and compliance with Section 20.30.100 (Public View Protection). 1. The project is subject to the City's Water-Efficient Landscape Ordinance (Chapter 14.17 of NBMC) and compliance will be confirmed at plan check prior to issuing building permits. 63 Planning Permit Application Attachment A Page 4 of 6 CUP No. 2020-39; SDR No. 2020-008; GPA No. 2020-004; LCPA No. 2020-006, JUne 15, 2022 - LHE PA2020-068 Application Resubmittal 2. Consistent with Section 20.30.100 (Public View Protections), the EIR (Section 5.2 Aesthetics/Light and Glare) provides an analysis of potential impacts to public views from Sunset View Park, Cliff Drive Park and Ensign View Park. Based upon that analysis, the proposed hotel will blend into the urban background and not block any important focal points including the horizon within existing public views from these vantages. Additionally, there are other taller buildings in the vicinity suggesting that proposed building would not be out of character despite the proposed increase in building height. Specifically, 601 & 611 Lido Park Drive and 3388 Via Lido are taller than the proposed height of the project. No significant public views through or near the project site are present in the immediate vicinity of the site. For these reasons, the analysis concludes that there will be no material impact to public coastal views. 3. Not detrimental to the harmonious and orderly growth of the City, or endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed development. Facts in Support of Finding: a. The hotel project is consistent with the Lido Village Design guidelines by providing architecturally pleasing project with a coastal theme with articulation and building modulation to enhance the urban environment consistent with the Lido Village Design Guidelines. The project provides a large, enhanced setback area between the hotel and Newport Boulevard and 32nd Street that include pedestrian paths, seating and landscape areas that will create a community focal point and providing connections to abutting uses. b. The project site is located in a developed commercial area with limited sensitive land uses located nearby. The overall height of the project will not materially impact any public views from General Plan designated vantages or significantly shade surrounding properties as demonstrated in Section 5.2 Aesthetics/Light and Glare of the Lido House Hotel EIR. c. The proposed surface parking lot provides 146 parking spaces (with 11 valet stacking within drive aisles) and through the use of valet parking that can facilitate additional on- site vehicles will accommodate 100% of the project's anticipated parking demand based on the Parking Demand Analysis dated June 8, 2022 by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers. There are 16 existing additional spaces for public use outside of the property boundary which are appropriate for occasional hotel uses after 5:00PM on 32nd Street. There are 14 proposed additional parking spaces for public use outside of the property boundary which are appropriate for occasional hotel uses after 5:00PM on Via Oporto. Additionally, the parking lot and vehicular access thereto has been designed to accommodate and provide safe access for passenger vehicles, emergency vehicles, delivery trucks, and refuse collection vehicles, as determined by the City Traffic Engineer. d. Direct vehicular access to Via Lido Plaza will be provided an existing driveway and easement located just west of the intersection of Finley Avenue and Newport Boulevard. The main entry to the hotel at Finley Avenue includes 16 parking spaces and area to accommodate approximately 22 cars west of the parking gate to accommodate short- term registration and valet parking and vehicle circulation without conflicting with vehicle access to Via Lido Plaza. The parking control gate at 32nd Street is designed and setback sufficiently to accommodate 2 cars, fire vehicle access and delivery trucks to avoid 64 Planning Permit Application Attachment A Page 5 of 6 CUP No. 2020-39; SDR No. 2020-008; GPA No. 2020-004; LCPA No. 2020-006, JUne 15, 2022 - LHE PA2020-068 Application Resubmittal conflicts along 32nd Street. The project proposes to add 14 additional spaces for public use of the property boundary on Via Oporto. e. Closing the site to unrestricted vehicular access by the public through the site to 32nd Street would discontinue direct vehicular access to Via Lido Plaza through an existing access gate located at the southeast corner of the site. Despite the closure of this access point, adequate vehicular access to Via Lido Plaza for cars, delivery trucks and emergency vehicles is currently provided by an existing driveway at Finley Avenue and an existing driveway from Via Lido. Large delivery trucks and fire trucks can access both parking areas at Via Lido Plaza. f. The project is subject to the City's Outdoor Lighting requirements contained within Section 20.30.070 (Outdoor Lighting) of the Zoning Code. g. Roof‐top mechanical equipment will be fully enclosed or screened from view consistent with the Municipal Code. h. The construction will comply with all Building, Public Works, and Fire Codes. All ordinances of the City and all conditions of approval shall be complied with. Conditional Use Permit Findings 1. The use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; Facts in Support of Finding: a. The proposed additional hotel square footage and 4‐cottage expansion is consistent with the proposed Visitor Serving Commercial‐Lido Village (CV‐LV) General Plan land use designation, CVLV (Visitor Serving Commercial ‐ Lido Village) Coastal Land Use Plan category, and the CV‐LV (Visitor Serving Commercial ‐ Lido Village) zoning district for the project site that provides for the horizontal or vertical intermixing of commercial, visitor accommodations, residential, and/or civic uses. Civic uses may include, but are not limited to, a community center, public plazas, a fire station and/or public parking. b. The project site is not located within a Specific Plan area. c. The proposed land use and zoning amendments and hotel is consistent with the goals and policies of the Newport Beach General Plan. The City Council concurs with the conclusion of the consistency analysis of the proposed project with these goals and policies provided in the FEIR. The mitigation measures specified in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been incorporated as conditions of approval. 2. The use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code and the Municipal Code; Facts in Support of Finding: a. The Zoning Code specifies that parking for a hotel be specified by Conditional Use Permit with the purpose to ensure that parking is adequately provided to meet demand. The proposed surface parking lot provides 146 parking spaces (with 11 valet stacking within drive aisles) and through the use of valet parking that can facilitate additional on‐ 65 Planning Permit Application Attachment A Page 6 of 6 CUP No. 2020-39; SDR No. 2020-008; GPA No. 2020-004; LCPA No. 2020-006, JUne 15, 2022 - LHE PA2020-068 Application Resubmittal site vehicles will accommodate 100% of the project's anticipated parking demand based on the Parking Demand Analysis dated June 8, 2022 by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers. There are 16 existing additional spaces for public use outside of the property boundary which are appropriate for occasional hotel uses after 5:00PM on 32nd Street. There are 14 proposed additional parking spaces for public use outside of the property boundary which are appropriate for occasional hotel uses after 5:00PM on Via Oporto. b. The proposed hotel will provide alcohol sales in conjunction with late night hours and as such, the operator is required to obtain an Operator License from the Police Department pursuant to Chapter 5.25. This requirement is included in the conditions of approval. 3. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the use are compatible with the allowed uses in the vicinity; Fact in Support of Finding: a. The project is compatible with surrounding development and public spaces in terms of bulk, scale and aesthetic treatments. The large setbacks identified in statement B-2 above will help offset the taller portions of the proposed buildings. Hotel buildings have been designed with a one, two and three story element along Newport Boulevard while providing a significant setback from the street providing areas for public access, landscaping, outdoor dining, and hotel use. 4. The site is physically suitable in terms of design, location, shape, size, operating characteristics, and the provision of public and vehicle (e.g., fire and medical) access and public services and utilities; and Facts in Support of Finding: a. The project site is approximately 4.25 acres in size and can accommodate the proposed hotel building, and adequate parking based upon project's anticipated parking demand based upon the parking analysis contained in Section 5.5 Traffic/Circulation of the Lido House EIR. Additionally, the site also accommodated a large-enhanced setback area comprising 21.4% of the site for public walkways, landscaping, and open space. b. The site is directly accessible from Newport Boulevard at the signalized intersection with Finley Avenue. Additionally, the site is directly accessible from 32nd Street. Adequate public and emergency vehicle access, public services, and utilities exist to accommodate the proposed hotel development as concluded by the Lido House Hotel FEIR NO. ER2014- 003 (SCH#2013111022). 5. Operation of the use at the location proposed would not be detrimental to the harmonious and orderly growth of the City, or endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Fact in Support of Finding: a. The use authorized by this permit is not a nightclub and its prohibition will avoid potential land use conflicts, nuisances, and police intervention potentially associated with nightclubs. 66 Attachment No. PC 3 Accepted Parking Demand Analysis 67 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE68 June 8, 2022 Mr. Anthony Wrzosek R.D. Olson Development 2955 Main Street, Third Floor Irvine, California 92614 LLG Reference No. 2.14.3547.2 Subject: Parking Demand Analysis for the Proposed Lido House Hotel Expansion Project Newport Beach, California Dear Mr. Wrzosek: As requested, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) is pleased to submit this Parking Demand Analysis for proposed Lido House Hotel Expansion (herein after referred to as Project) in the City of Newport Beach, California. Figure 1, located at the rear of this letter report, presents a Vicinity Map, which illustrates the general location of the project site and depicts the surrounding area. The Project site is currently developed with the Lido House Hotel, which consists of a four-story, 103,470 square-foot (SF) hotel including 130 hotel rooms, meeting rooms, accessory retail spaces, a restaurant, lobby bar, rooftop bar, guest pool, and other recreational areas. A pedestrian plaza, landscaped areas, and other amenities complement the hotel along Newport Boulevard and 32nd Street. The current parking supply consists of 148 surface parking spaces with a valet service that currently accommodates up to 15 additional valet parking spaces for a total current supply of 163 spaces. It should be noted that the parking operation is 100% valet and will continue with the proposed expansion Project. Figure 2 presents an existing site aerial, which shows the existing layout of the Lido House Hotel property. The proposed Project consists of requesting entitlements to increase the maximum allowed gross floor area of the hotel from 103,470 SF to 118,573 SF. The additional 15,103 SF would allow development of five (5) new hotel cottages and slightly expand the existing hotel building. The project would also incorporate the adjacent parcel, currently occupied by Lido Fire Station No. 2, by demolishing the fire facility to accommodate additional on-site parking. Figure 3 presents the proposed site plan for the Project, prepared by WATG. As shown, the Project will construct five (5) new cottages adjacent to the existing cottages on the southeast corner of the existing hotel and reconfigure the parking lot, accordingly, and modify the site to provide 146 69 Mr. Anthony Wrzosek June 8, 2022 Page 2 N:\3500\2143547-2 - Lido House Hotel Special Events, Newport Beach\Report\3547-2 Lido House Hotel Expansion Parking Demand Analysis - NB, 06-08-22.doc parking spaces plus eleven (11) additional stacked valet spaces for a total of 157 on- site vehicular parking spaces. In addition, thirty-two (32) bicycle parking spaces will be provided (beyond the 10 CalGreen required bicycle spaces), which equates to as much as eight (8) equivalent vehicle parking spaces per a growing common practice in other jurisdictions [i.e. Los Angeles MC Section 12.21.A.4 & Laguna Beach MC Section 25.52.012(E)]. Furthermore, four (4) vanpool/carpool spaces will be provided, consistent with the Transportation Management Plan (TMP), which would presumably reduce the parking demand by at least four (4) spaces, given that the employee parking demand would be reduced accordingly. Therefore, the total parking supply will consist of 165 equivalent parking spaces. Lastly, fourteen (14) additional parking spaces will be constructed along Via Oporto, which will be available for hotel guests on a first come first serve basis. Based on our understanding, a parking study is required by the City of Newport Beach as part of the CUP application to add the additional five (5) cottages and to determine the parking demand for the existing hotel with the aforementioned project modifications, to ensure that adequate parking will be provided. This report evaluates the parking demand of the existing hotel with the proposed new cottages at the Lido House Hotel. The parking demand analysis evaluates the Project’s parking requirements based on the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code (Approved CUP for the Lido House Hotel) and utilization of existing parking surveys, as directed by the City. Our method of analysis, findings, and recommendations are detailed in the following sections of this report. PARKING SUPPLY-DEMAND ANALYSIS The parking analysis for the Lido Marina Village Project involves determining the expected parking needs, based on the size and type of existing and proposed development components versus the parking supply. For this expansion Project, there is one appropriate methods that can be used to estimate the site’s peak parking requirements. These methods include: 1. Application of parking survey information, based on existing parking characteristics, combined with the peak demand for the new cottages, which combines actual parking demand data with projected demand data based on City Code. 70 Mr. Anthony Wrzosek June 8, 2022 Page 3 N:\3500\2143547-2 - Lido House Hotel Special Events, Newport Beach\Report\3547-2 Lido House Hotel Expansion Parking Demand Analysis - NB, 06-08-22.doc It should be noted that per the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code – Chapter 20.40, Off-Street Parking, Table 3-10, Off-Street Parking Requirements, the hotel parking requirement is based the Conditional Use Permit for the Project. Consequently, based on the approved Parking Study for the Lido House Hotel, prepared by Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (April 18, 2014), the recommended parking requirement for the hotel room component of the Lido House Hotel development is 0.8 spaces per hotel room. As a result, the recommended parking requirement for the proposed five (5) additional cottages is four (4) spaces (0.8 spaces per room x 5 rooms = 4 spaces). Parking Survey Data Parking Demand Analysis To determine the current parking demand of the existing Lido House Hotel, parking surveys were conducted on a typical weekend day by Transportation Studies, Inc. given that weekends are the busiest times at the hotel. The parking surveys were performed at one-hour intervals between 7:00 AM and 1:00 AM on Saturday October 30, 2021. The parking surveys consisted of counting the number of parked vehicles within the hotel property including vehicles that were stacked in the drive aisles. It should be noted that hotel was 89% occupied on the day of the parking counts. The results of the weekend day (Saturday) parking surveys are summarized in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, the hotel experienced a weekend day (Saturday) peak parking demand of 141 vehicles that occurred within the hotel property at 5:00 PM. In addition as shown in Table 1, the parking counts were adjusted based on the industry standard hotel design capacity of 93% occupancy, which equates to a factor of 104.5%. As a result, the peak parking demand design for the existing hotel property is 147 spaces. In order to determine the most appropriate peak-parking requirement for the Lido Hotel Expansion Project, utilization of the survey data for the existing hotel is combined with the City Code requirement parking demand for the five (5) additional hotel cottages. Therefore, based on the current peak parking demand of 147 spaces combined with the City Code requirement of four (4) spaces for the additional cottages, the recommended peak parking requirement is 151 parking spaces, which results in a parking surplus of fourteen (14) parking spaces (91.5% utilization) with a proposed parking supply of 165 parking spaces. It should be noted that even if we were to assume a requirement of 5 parking spaces for the five (5) proposed cottages, adequate parking would still be provided (13 space surplus). It should be noted that since the peak parking requirement is based on a peak hotel occupancy adjustment to the peak empirical parking data, a parking demand of 151 spaces can be considered the absolute peak demand. In addition, given the potential 71 Mr. Anthony Wrzosek June 8, 2022 Page 4 N:\3500\2143547-2 - Lido House Hotel Special Events, Newport Beach\Report\3547-2 Lido House Hotel Expansion Parking Demand Analysis - NB, 06-08-22.doc variation in seasonal parking surplus, it is recommended the Lido House employees continue to utilize additional the parking reduction measures identified in the Transportation Management Plan (TMP) (November 19, 2015) developed as part of the entitlement for the hotel, which are currently administered, such as an on-site employee transportation coordinator, ride matching services, as well as carpool, vanpool, transit, and bicycle incentives. Nonetheless, the hotel will enhance the current TMP measures to further incentivize reduced employee parking demand. Consequently, utilizing these measures could reduce the parking demand by at least four (4) parking spaces during peak conditions as a result of the four (4) vanpool/carpool spaces and employee trip reduction incentives. As a result, the effective peak parking demand is 147 parking spaces (89.1% utilization) with the application of the four (4) vanpool/carpool space and employee trip reduction incentive described above as part of the hotel TMP. CONCLUSION Based on the forecast peak parking demand of 147 to 151 parking spaces and proposed parking supply of 165 parking spaces (89.1% to 91.5% utilization) combined with bicycle parking equivalency and implementation of the TMP, which will satisfy the parking deficiency, it is concluded that the proposed Lido House Hotel Expansion Project, to include five (5) additional hotel cottages and minimal additional hotel area, is complaint with peak demand and parking requirements. * * * * * * * * * * We appreciate the opportunity to prepare this analysis for RD Olson. Should you have any questions or need additional assistance, please do not hesitate to call us at (949) 825-6175. Very truly yours, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers Keil D. Maberry, P.E. Principal Attachments 72 73 74 75 Time Parking Occupancy Parking Occupancy Total Began Counts Adjustment [2]Counts Adjustment [2]Adjusted 7:00 AM 87 91 3 3 94 8:00 AM 99 103 3 3 106 9:00 AM 104 108 3 3 111 10:00 AM 93 97 3 3 100 11:00 AM 88 91 3 3 94 12:00 PM 85 88 3 3 91 1:00 PM 93 97 3 3 100 2:00 PM 97 101 5 5 106 3:00 PM 101 105 4 4 109 4:00 PM 123 128 7 7 135 5:00 PM 129 134 12 13 147 6:00 PM 113 117 10 10 127 7:00 PM 111 115 6 6 121 8:00 PM 107 111 6 6 117 9:00 PM 102 106 7 7 113 10:00 PM 103 107 6 6 113 11:00 PM 107 111 7 7 118 12:00 AM 105 109 6 6 115 Notes: [2] At the time of the parking survey, 116 rooms were occupied (89% occupancy). The parking survey has been adjusted for a design standard of 93% occupancy. [1] On-site parking survey conducted by Transportation Studies, Inc. Regular & Handicap Spaces Stacked Valet Spaces Table 1 Parking Counts - Saturday, October 30, 2021 [1] Lido House Hotel Expansion, Newport Beach 76 Attachment No. PC 4 Addendum No. 2 to the Lido House Hotel Final EIR (The Final EIR, Addendum No. 1, and Addendum No. 2 are all available at www.newportbeachca.gov/CEQA within the “Lido House Hotel” folder due to size.) 77 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE78 Attachment No. PC 5 Applicant’s Project Plans 79 INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3a - Additional Materials Received Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3a - Additional Materials Received Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3a - Additional Materials Received Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3a - Additional Materials Received Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) July 21, 2022, Planning Commission Item 3 Comments These comments on a Newport Beach Planning Commission agenda item are submitted by: Jim Mosher ( jimmosher@yahoo.com ), 2210 Private Road, Newport Beach 92660 (949-548-6229). Item No. 3. LIDO HOUSE HOTEL EXPANSION (PA2020-068) There is a contradiction between the statement at the top of page 2 of the staff report, that: “If approved, a coastal development permit amendment will also be required from the California Coastal Commission since it was the original review authority for the Lido House Hotel project,” and that at the bottom of page 11 of the EIR Addendum (under “Requested Discretionary Actions”): “The proposed changes to the project are not substantial and do not involve new approvals or amendments to the Coastal Commission's certification of LCP-5-NPB-14-0831-3.” The staff report’s conclusion that the changes are substantial seems the better one. If they were not, it is hard to see why they would require changes to the General Plan and LCP to implement. On the other hand, the staff report seems less accurate than the EIR in stating on page 4 that “In February 2017, the Coastal Commission authorized the [previous] increase” in floor area. The EIR appears to be correct about this, stating on page 7 the increase was “approved by the Coastal Commission on March 8, 2017.” Assuming the staff report is correct, it is interesting that in this case City staff acknowledges the CCC retains control over approving development inconsistent with the pre-certification CDP, as amended, whereas in the recent case of major modifications to the Newport Center Marriott Hotel and Spa, the Planning Commission was told the CCC had lost jurisdiction as a result of its certification of the LCP. Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3a - Additional Materials Received Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3a - Additional Materials Received Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3a - Additional Materials Received Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3a - Additional Materials Received Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3a - Additional Materials Received Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) July 21, 2022, Planning Commission Item 3 Comments These comments on a Newport Beach Planning Commission agenda item are submitted by: Jim Mosher ( jimmosher@yahoo.com ), 2210 Private Road, Newport Beach 92660 (949-548-6229). Item No. 3. LIDO HOUSE HOTEL EXPANSION (PA2020-068) There is a contradiction between the statement at the top of page 2 of the staff report, that: “If approved, a coastal development permit amendment will also be required from the California Coastal Commission since it was the original review authority for the Lido House Hotel project,” and that at the bottom of page 11 of the EIR Addendum (under “Requested Discretionary Actions”): “The proposed changes to the project are not substantial and do not involve new approvals or amendments to the Coastal Commission's certification of LCP-5-NPB-14-0831-3.” The staff report’s conclusion that the changes are substantial seems the better one. If they were not, it is hard to see why they would require changes to the General Plan and LCP to implement. On the other hand, the staff report seems less accurate than the EIR in stating on page 4 that “In February 2017, the Coastal Commission authorized the [previous] increase” in floor area. The EIR appears to be correct about this, stating on page 7 the increase was “approved by the Coastal Commission on March 8, 2017.” Assuming the staff report is correct, it is interesting that in this case City staff acknowledges the CCC retains control over approving development inconsistent with the pre-certification CDP, as amended, whereas in the recent case of major modifications to the Newport Center Marriott Hotel and Spa, the Planning Commission was told the CCC had lost jurisdiction as a result of its certification of the LCP. Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3a - Additional Materials Received Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Planning Commission Public Hearing July 21, 2022 Benjamin Zdeba, Principal Planner Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3b - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Staff Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Vicinity Map Hoag Hospital Pacific Ocean Lido Isle Lido House Hotel Balboa Peninsula Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3b - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Staff Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Land Use Designation Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3b - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Staff Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Background •Sept. 2014 Council executed long-term ground lease and approved 130-room project •Oct. 2015 Coastal Commission authorization •Apr. 2016 Approval of requested development limit increase to 103,470 sq. ft. •Mar. 2017 Coastal Commission authorization •Apr. 2018 Lido House Hotel opened 4Community Development Department Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3b - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Staff Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Existing Lido House Hotel Site Former Fire Station No. 2Current Lease Area Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3b - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Staff Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Applicant’s Request 6Community Development Department EXISTIGN 103,470 sf Level Addition 1 Addition 2 Addition 3 Addition 4 Total Ground 8,351 sf five cottages* 1,466 sf storage space 3,481 sf walkway/break -out rooms 600 sf greenhouse room 13,898 sf Second 273 sf suite conversion 273 sf Third 273 sf suite conversion 273 sf Fourth 273 sf suite conversion 386 sf rooftop enclosure 659 sf +15,103 sf 118,573 sf *three-story structures Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3b - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Staff Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Applicant’s Request (Cont.) •Demo former Fire Station No. 2 and replace with: 28 private valet parking spaces 14 public parking spaces •Realign 32nd St driveway and reconfigure onsite parking •Install new barrier fence and gates along 32nd St and Newport Blvd frontages 7Community Development Department Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3b - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Staff Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Project Birdseye View 8Community Development Department Five Cottages Walkway/ Breakout Rooftop Enclosure New Parking Greenhouse New Fence/Landscaping 14 Public Spaces Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3b - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Staff Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Project 32nd Street View 9Community Development Department New Fence/Landscaping Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3b - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Staff Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Required City Entitlements •Amendments to the General Plan, Local Coastal Program, and Zoning Code to increase limit to 118,573 sf 14.6% increase in floor area for enhanced hotel operation Predicted traffic is less than former City Hall Consistent with GP and LCP goals and policies Consistent with development standards 10Community Development Department Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3b - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Staff Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Section 423 Analysis Community Development Department 11 Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3b - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Staff Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Required City Entitlements •Site Development Review Maintains Lido House Hotel architectural style Parking layout reviewed by City Traffic Engineer Retains two landmark Ficus trees Large setback area remains and is enhanced •Conditional Use Permit Minimal operational changes Reviewed by Building, Fire, Public Works, Code Enforcement Adequate parking provided for increase 12Community Development Department Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3b - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Staff Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Parking •Parking Demand Analysis by Linscott Law & Greenspan (Attachment No. PC 3) •Peak demand of 151 parking spaces •Project provides: 146 parking spaces 11 valet parking spaces 8 equivalent parking spaces (bicycle parking) 165 total provided parking spaces •City Traffic Engineer reviewed and accepted 13Community Development Department Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3b - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Staff Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Parking •Parking Demand Analysis by Linscott Law & Greenspan (Attachment No. PC 3) •Peak demand of 151 parking spaces •Project provides: 146 parking spaces 11 valet parking spaces 8 equivalent parking spaces (bicycle parking) 165 total provided parking spaces •City Traffic Engineer reviewed and accepted 14Community Development Department 28 Valet 14 PublicBike Racks 11 Valet Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3b - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Staff Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Required Coastal Entitlements •California Coastal Commission Authorization for: •LCP Amendments •Coastal Development Permit 15Community Development Department Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3b - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Staff Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) CEQA Review •Addendum No. 2 to Certified Final EIR Prepared by Michael Baker International •Detailed in Section 2 of Reso No. PC2022-020 (Attachment No. PC 1) •Project will not result in any new or more severe significant impacts 16Community Development Department Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3b - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Staff Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Recommended Action •Conduct Public Hearing •Adopt Resolution No. PC2022-020 17Community Development Department Next Steps •Sept. 13, 2022 City Council Public Hearing and Lease Agreement Amendment for Expanded Area •Late 2022 Submit LCP Amendments to Coastal Commission •Applicant Pursues CDP Amendment Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3b - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Staff Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) 18 Questions and Discussion Benjamin Zdeba, Principal Planner bzdeba@newportbeachca.gov Planning Commission Public Hearing July 21, 2022 Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3b - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Staff Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) CEQA Review •Addendum No. 2 to Certified Final EIR Prepared by Michael Baker International •Detailed in Section 2 of Reso No. PC2022-020 (Attachment No. PC 1) •Project will not result in any new or more severe significant impacts 19Community Development Department Existing Trash Enclosure Additional Trash Enclosure Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3b - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Staff Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) CEQA Review •Addendum No. 2 to Certified Final EIR Prepared by Michael Baker International •Detailed in Section 2 of Reso No. PC2022-020 (Attachment No. PC 1) •Project will not result in any new or more severe significant impacts 20Community Development Department Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3b - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Staff Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Lido House Expansion Planning Commission July 21, 2022 Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3c - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Applicant Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) AERIAL VIEW Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3c - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Applicant Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) VIEW FROM 32ND ST & NEWPORT BLVD Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3c - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Applicant Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) VIEW FROM 32ND STREET Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3c - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Applicant Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) VIEW FROM 32ND STREET Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3c - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Applicant Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) VIEW FROM 32ND ST & VIA OPORTO Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3c - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Applicant Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3c - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Applicant Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068) THANK YOU Planning Commission - July 21, 2022 Item No. 3c - Additional Materials Presented at the Meeting by Applicant Lido House Hotel Expansion (PA2020-068)