HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.0_General Plan Circulation Element Update_PA2017-141CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
September 8, 2022
Agenda Item No. 5
SUBJECT: General Plan Circulation Element Update
(PA2017-141)
SITE LOCATION: Citywide
APPLICANT: City of Newport Beach
ENGINEER: Antony Brine, City Traffic Engineer
949-644-3329, tbrine@newportbeachca.gov
PROJECT SUMMARY
The Circulation Element is a planning document that looks to a roughly 20-year horizon
and establishes the City’s vision for its own mobility. The City’s Circulation Element was
last updated in 2006. For the past two years, City staff and the consultant team have
worked together with the Planning Commission and the community to prepare the
General Plan Circulation Element Update. The update of the Circulation Element was
prepared simultaneously with the recently approved 6th Cycle Housing Element. The
purpose of the Update at this time is to provide new Goals and Policies that will comply
with State mandates such as Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) legislation and “Complete
Streets” legislation. Updated Goals and Policies also reflect the community’s vision on
trending transportation matters, including electric vehicles (EV) and climate change,
rideshare services, public transportation, bicycle plans and electric bikes, telecommuting,
roadway safety, as well as parking management. The General Plan Circulation Element
Update document is accessible online at www.newportbeachca.gov/DraftCEUpdate.
RECOMMENDATION
1) Conduct a public hearing.
2) Find this activity exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, because it has no potential
to have a significant effect on the environment; and
3) Adopt Resolution No. PC2022-025 recommending adoption of the General Plan
Circulation Element Update to the City Council (Attachment No. PC 1).
1
INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE2
DISCUSSION
Introduction
The Circulation Element governs the long-term mobility system of the city. The primary
purpose of the Circulation Element is to evaluate, improve and manage the circulation
system to meet the current and future needs of the city. The purpose of the document is
not to define specific construction projects, but to outline Goals and Policies that will
provide for the safe and efficient movement of people and goods through all modes of
travel. The circulation and transportation system play a vital role in the economic vitality
of the city. The Circulation Element correlates with the Land Use Element. The Goals and
Policies provide for a balanced transportation network that will support and encourage
walking, bicycling, and transit ridership while also supporting traditional vehicle mobility.
Goals and Policies have been written to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, plan and
incorporate for future technology, and improve safety in the circulation system.
The updated Circulation Element incorporates nine (9) primary topics including:
• Mobility.
• Roadway System.
• Regional Transportation.
• Public Transportation.
• Alternative Transportation Modes.
• Emerging Technology (NEW).
• Climate Change (NEW).
• Parking.
• Transportation Funding.
The nine (9) primary topics in the updated Circulation Element include eighteen (18)
overall Goals, and one hundred and eighteen (118) specific Policies. A total of twenty-
six (26) entirely new Policies were added with the Update.
The 2006 Circulation Element includes the Master Plan of Streets and Highways, future
primary intersection geometries, and acceptable levels of service at those intersections.
The proposed amendment proposes no changes to these components at this time.
Legal and Regulatory Mandates
The updated Circulation Element incorporates the mandates of State law that have come
into effect since the last update in 2006, including Complete Streets and Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT). State laws mandate integration of land use and transportation planning
and are shifting the focus away from congestion to climate change in transportation
planning and engineering.
3
Assembly Bill (AB) 1358, the Complete Streets Act of 2008, requires cities to plan for a
balanced, multimodal transportation network that meets the needs of all users of streets,
roads, and highways for safe and convenient travel.
Senate Bill (SB) 743, approved in 2013, establishes Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as the
metric for determining transportation impacts in CEQA analysis. The city will utilize VMT
analysis as part of the CEQA process but will also continue to analyze development
projects using the Level-of-Service (LOS) analysis as prescribed in the city’s Traffic
Phasing Ordinance.
The Circulation Element Update is consistent with Senate Bill (SB) 375, approved in 2008,
by supporting the State’s climate action goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
through coordinated transportation and land use planning.
Coordination with 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
In January 2020, the City Council directed staff to update the Housing Element for
compliance with the State Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), along with
preparing a simultaneous update to the Circulation Element to address legal mandates
and ensure adequate mobility for the community.
In April 2020, the City Council authorized a professional services agreement with Kimley-
Horn and Associates (Kimley-Horn) for the preparation of the more focused Housing and
Circulation Element updates. The contract with Kimley-Horn included the services of LSA
Associates for the preparation of the Circulation Element Update.
Planning Commission Involvement
On September 17, 2020, a presentation was made to the Planning Commission outlining
the plans for outreach with the community during the development of the Circulation
Element Update. As part of the Staff Report on September 17, 2020, an “Issues White
Paper” was provided, which covered topics that could be included in the update.
On October 13, 2020, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2020-93 delegating the
duties to the Planning Commission to oversee the Circulation Element Update process
and to provide strategic guidance and a public forum for discussion of the update.
Subsequently, Commissioner Koetting was appointed to work with the Outreach
Subcommittee of the Housing Element Update Advisory Committee that assisted staff
with the outreach process.
On November 19, 2020, staff presented to the Planning Commission an Introduction to
the Circulation Element. Staff outlined the key terminology and discussed the eight (8)
existing topics which are a part of the 2006 Circulation Element. Additionally, the City
Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH) and the Bicycle Master Plan were
4
discussed. To conclude the presentation, staff outlined the plan for a series of Public
Workshops and outreach during the fall of 2020 and early 2021.
During the community outreach period, staff provided the Planning Commission with
regular monthly updates between November 19, 2020, and March 4, 2021.
Staff and the transportation consultant presented the Initial Draft of the Circulation
Element Update at the Study Session of the March 18, 2021, Planning Commission
meeting. Input from the Planning Commission has been incorporated into the revised
Circulation Element Update.
Community Outreach and Engagement
To provide ample opportunities for community participation, the City implemented an on-
going outreach and engagement effort for the Circulation Element Update. To ensure the
involvement of as much of the community and interested parties as possible, City staff
worked closely with an outreach consultant and advertised participation opportunities
using social media, City website updates, and the Newport Together webpage. The public
outreach process included five (5) virtual workshops.
The first virtual Public Workshop was held on November 23, 2020. The workshop was an
introductory “Circulation Element 101” session. The workshop provided an opportunity for
staff to introduce the existing 2006 Circulation Element, and to engage with the residents
and begin receiving comments and feedback. There was an attendance of 45
participants. The public showed an interest in bicycle and pedestrian safety, emerging
transportation modes, the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis, telecommuting effects,
and coordination with adjacent jurisdictions.
Back-to-back virtual Public Workshops were held on December 15 and 16, 2020. Each
topic of the Circulation Element was discussed in more detail. The current Goals and
Policies were covered in detail. There were 42 participants on the December 15
workshop, and 36 participants on December 16 workshop. A robust exchange of verbal
and written comments and questions was a part of these workshops. The public was
interested in Complete Streets, bicycle infrastructure, climate change, regional traffic
impacts in neighborhoods, electric vehicles, rideshare operations (e.g., Uber and Lyft),
autonomous vehicles, and parking availability.
The fourth virtual Public Workshop was held on February 10, 2021. This workshop was
presented as a Visioning opportunity. There were 35 participants in the workshop. Staff
discussed the comments and ideas provided by the community in the previous
workshops. There was a discussion in this workshop to maintaining consistency with the
OCTA Master Plan of Arterial Highways. Possible loss of funding and the process to make
any changes to the Master Plan was covered in detail. The primary goal of the workshop
was to outline the policies that would not be changing, and policies that need or should
be modified or added.
5
The fifth virtual Public Workshop was held on April 5, 2021. This workshop was for the
presentation of the Draft Circulation Element. Each of the key topics were discussed
again including new Goals and Policies.
The Initial Draft of the Circulation Element was first released to the public on the city
website on March 12, 2021. Revisions were made to the document following the Planning
Commission Study Session held on March 18, 2021. Additional revisions were made to
reflect community input following the Public Workshop held on April 5, 2021.
The current Draft Final document was posted on the city website for public review on July
12, 2022. There are only a few changes since last year, primarily in the rearrangement of
a few Policies. New Policies were added covering bikeway legislation, school district
coordination, pedestrian sidewalk improvements, and emergency evacuation routes.
New exhibits for the Master Plan of Streets and Highways, the Bicycle Master Plan, the
Equestrian and Hiking Trails, and Roadway Cross Sections have been prepared and
incorporated into the Draft Final document.
Emerging Technology
The city recognizes the emergence of autonomous and inter-connected vehicles and the
implications that this technology could have on public infrastructure design. The
emergence of autonomous vehicles and other advanced mobility technologies will require
preparation and ongoing management and operation of the city’s transportation system.
Integrating the emerging technology into the roadway system will evolve over time as new
data and best practices become available.
Trends in transportation planning and vehicle production provide a lot of insight into the
reasonably foreseeable future. Gaining the benefit while avoiding some of the pitfalls of
connected and autonomous vehicles will require the city’s roadway infrastructure to
connect with these vehicles. Routine maintenance of roadway infrastructure and traffic
signal equipment should plan for improving the communication between the vehicles and
the traffic signal infrastructure. Funding will be included in the annual capital improvement
budget when planning for the necessary equipment. New policies within the Circulation
Element will provide for this inevitable process.
Complete Streets
Assembly Bill (AB) 1358, titled the Complete Streets Act, was signed into law by Governor
Schwarzenegger in October 2008. This law requires that cities and counties plan a
circulation system that meets the needs of all users of streets including motorists,
pedestrians, bicyclists, children, persons with disabilities, seniors, movers of commercial
goods, and users of public transportation. As far back as 2011, the Governor’s Office of
Planning and Research (OPR) issued new general plan update guidelines which stated
that “AB 1358 places the planning, designing, and building of complete streets into the
6
larger planning framework of the general plan by requiring jurisdictions to amend their
circulation elements to plan for multimodal transportation networks”.
In 2012, the Orange County Council of Governments (OCCOG) prepared a Complete
Streets guidance document for all Orange County agencies to consider. A Policy has
been included to prepare a Citywide Complete Streets Master Plan. The plan will identify
components (e.g., missing sidewalks, missing links in bike paths, missing curb ramps for
the disabled, etc.) necessary to ensure a more complete design for all users. The Orange
County Council of Governments (OCCOG) Complete Streets Initiative Design Handbook
will be used as a reference.
Vehicle Miles Traveled
Senate Bill (SB) 743 was approved in 2013 and established that a Vehicle Miles Traveled
(VMT) analysis shall be prepared and used to assess transportation impacts in CEQA
analysis. While the city adopted new CEQA vehicle miles traveled (VMT) thresholds in
2020, the practical application of this new requirement is not consistent with the policy
objectives of the 2006 Circulation Element. In fact, the 2006 General Plan Circulation
Element does not even consider issues of VMT or anticipate this type of change to
environmental and general plan requirements. The Circulation Element Update includes
policies that specifically address the requirement to evaluate development and
transportation projects using VMT and discusses potential methods to seek practical
mitigation of any disclosed VMT impacts.
Climate Change
The topic of climate change is important to Newport Beach. Goals and policies specific to
climate change and mobility have been included. Among these goals are increasing the
number of electric vehicle charging stations, both in City buildings and where appropriate,
in future new developments. State requirements related to climate change such as
planning for Complete Streets and analysis of Vehicle Miles Traveled are incorporated in
the Circulation Element Update. The city seeks to do its part while encouraging residents
and business partners to address climate change.
Traffic Model Update
As part of the Circulation Element Update effort, the transportation firm Urban Crossroads
was contracted to update the Newport Beach Traffic Model (NBTM). The NBTM is a
transportation computer software program used to forecast future traffic volumes on the
City’s arterial roadway system, identify any roadway deficiencies, and outline needed
improvements relative to the buildout of the General Plan. The updated NBTM was
completed in October 2021 and is consistent with the Orange County Transportation
Authority (OCTA) Transportation Model. The Traffic Model is used to assess the ability of
the roadway/circulation system to support future land use development along with
regional traffic.
7
The updated NBTM will be used in the preparation of the traffic analysis during the Land
Use Element Update process to understand the impact of the additional housing added
to the General Plan. Should roadway or intersection deficiencies be identified, the results
will guide a policy discussion about the design of the future roadway network. Future
levels of service at the intersections will not be the basis of traffic impacts in the City’s
environmental impact report for the land use element update.
Upcoming Land Use Element Update
As part of the upcoming Land Use Element Update, a complete technical traffic analysis
will be prepared. The traffic analysis will include an evaluation of any impacts associated
with the housing units incorporated in the 6th Cycle Housing Element, in addition to future
land use planning. The traffic analysis will contain a traditional intersection level of service
(LOS) analysis given existing and proposed Circulation Element policies requiring this
type of analysis. The traffic analysis will be prepared per the requirements of the Traffic
Phasing Ordinance (TPO). The LOS analysis would not be part of any General Plan
Update CEQA document because the impacts of vehicle delay are no longer part of the
CEQA impact analysis process pursuant to State law (SB 743). The traffic analysis will
include an assessment of VMT citywide, which would be incorporated within the CEQA
document.
Master Plan of Streets and Highways
The OCTA administers the County Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH). The MPAH
defines the long-range highway system for the County. Local jurisdictions are required to
have consistency between their Circulation Element and the MPAH. Consistency with the
MPAH ensures that each city and the County implement the same base transportation
network using similar design and standards.
OCTA administers a variety of Measure M funding programs for cities to widen streets,
improve intersections, coordinate signals, build Smart Streets and rehabilitate pavement.
OCTA also administers regional streets and road improvement projects. For cities to
participate in these programs and receive funding, the cities are required to adopt a
Circulation Element consistent with the County MPAH. The current City Master Plan of
Streets and Highways (MPSH) is consistent with the County MPAH.
As part of this update to the Circulation Element, no revisions are proposed to the existing
City’s Master Plan of Streets and Highways. The technical traffic analysis that will be
prepared with the upcoming Land Use Element Update will review the city’s Master Plan
of Streets and Highways. The traffic analysis will also identify any necessary intersection
or roadway improvements.
8
Updated Goals and Policies
A number of the existing Policies are not proposed to be changed. They are general
Policies for providing an integrated transportation system, supporting public transit,
maintaining regional consistency with the Orange County Transportation Authority
(OCTA) Master Plan of Arterial Highways, improving traffic signal operations, providing
adequate parking for development, etc. These important Goals and Policies are still
relevant today and will be in the future.
Several of the new Policies that are proposed to be modified and added are a direct result
of the State mandates to support Complete Streets, Vehicle Miles Traveled analysis, and
State climate action goals.
Additionally, community input received at all of the workshops was essential in creating
new Goals and Policies to address current and noteworthy issues that are very important
to the community today. Some of the important new Policies discussed and requested by
the residents at the community workshops for inclusion are outlined below.
- Electric vehicles. A new Policy to install additional EV charging stations in city
facilities and to develop incentives for the installation of charging stations in new
development projects.
- Parking. A Policy to support the development of parking related apps to promote
efficient parking. A Policy to review commercial areas for use of curbside zones
for drop-off, rideshare, valet or delivery uses.
- Pedestrian sidewalk improvements. As part of annual CIP program, a Policy to
consider implementation and construction of new or wider sidewalks appropriate
for a street or neighborhood, and to provide for safer opportunities to cross streets.
- Construction Management. A Policy to require construction management plans for
large development projects to address haul routes. Plans will also be required to
address congestion, parking and noise associated with residential neighborhood
construction.
- Rideshare vehicles. A Policy to consider rideshare usage in determining any
potential for reduction in parking requirements.
- Traffic Safety. To address roadway safety for all users, a new Policy has been
added to formally evaluate traffic collision data on an annual basis. Appropriate
traffic safety improvements will be planned to follow the practices of the “Safe
System Approach”. This policy aligns with the recently approved U.S. Department
of Transportation’s National Roadway Safety Strategy (NRSS) which set the first
national goal of zero roadway fatalities and recognizes the Safe System approach
as encompassing a range of roadway safety programs and stakeholders.
9
- Bicycle Improvements. The 2006 General Plan does not include a policy for a
comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan. This update incorporates the existing Bicycle
Master Plan adopted in 2014 and directs the city to regularly review and update
the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to include eligible bicycle improvements
to the circulation system. Adopting this Circulation Element update prepares the
city to implement the vision of active transportation and Complete Streets. The
existing Bicycle Master Plan details the current bicycle network and offers many
future improvements which will enhance the roadway network.
- Electric Bikes. To address a regularly raised topic, new Policy language is added
to review bicycle sidewalk use, review sidewalk widths and consider separate
facilities for e-bikes and other semi-motorized modes to reduce conflicts. Increased
enforcement is also supported, with a focus on the Oceanfront and around schools.
Summary
For the past two years, City staff and the consultant team have worked together with the
Planning Commission and the community to prepare the General Plan Circulation
Element Update. Eight (8) meetings were held with the Planning Commission to present
the Circulation Element Update and to provide status. See Attachment No. PC 3. Five (5)
community workshops were held, and extensive input was received from the public. See
Attachment No. PC 4. Current transportation topics were covered with the intent to
provide new Goals and Policies to address the paramount and timely issues that are
important to the community today. Staff and the consultant have prepared this update to
the Circulation Element that reflects the current regulatory environment and includes the
fresh perspective of the community. Adopting the proposed Goals and Policies of the
Circulation Element Update at this time ensures that the most recent investment in
community engagement is reflected in current City planning.
The timeline of the Circulation Element Update has revolved around the Housing Element
Update. Although the updated Goals and Policies for the Circulation Element were
predominantly complete by mid-2021, the proper focus of the City Council and staff
throughout the fall of 2021 and early 2022 was the completion of the Housing Element
Update.
Updating the Goals and Policies of the Circulation Element at this time provides the
opportunity for the city to become compliant with AB 1358, avoids potential legal issues
associated with not planning for Complete Streets projects as part of our General Plan,
and presents a competitive advantage for current and future regional and state
transportation funds such as the OCTA Bicycle Corridor Improvement Program.
Incorporation of associated projects into the annual Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
is vital to current and future transportation planning. In addition, the integration of the
Bicycle Master Plan into the Circulation Element addresses the planning and provision of
10
active transportation improvements that are very important to the community and
residents. Many active transportation improvements of current interest to the community
will be reflected in the updated Circulation Element as part of the Bicycle Master Plan.
The planning for these projects should be reflected in the General Plan at the present
time.
The Circulation Element Update provides direction on mitigating Vehicle Miles Traveled
(VMT) impacts and working with regional agencies to create mitigation programs that can
enhance the efficiency and ability to mitigate VMT impacts. In doing so, the Circulation
Element Update supports the City’s CEQA process and provides primary guidance for
mobility planning through the development review process.
This internal practice and policy consistency of VMT analysis is timely given the state’s
(Caltrans) recent actions to get involved in local agency land use development discretion.
Caltrans, through their Transportation Analysis Framework (TAF) and Transportation
Analysis under CEQA (TAC) process, will actively participate in the local agency
development review process and will comment on issues like consistency with circulation
plans and policies (CEQA Checklist Question 1). With an updated Circulation Element,
the city will maintain consistency between CEQA policy and CEQA practice.
With this update to the Goals and Policies of the 2006 Circulation Element, the Master
Plan of Streets and Highways is not proposed for revision. As part of the upcoming Land
Use Element update, a technical traffic analysis will be prepared. Adopting the Circulation
Element Update at this time does not eliminate any future opportunities to alter the
configuration of streets and intersections. The Circulation Element Update, as presented,
allows the City to advance current planning for other facilities consistent with Complete
Streets planning requirements. There are only a few Policies directly associated with the
Master Plan of Streets and Highways and construction of intersection improvements.
These Policies would be addressed in support of the upcoming Land Use Element
Update. All other updated Goals and Policies, as presented here, are timely given the
state law mandates and current transportation issues of importance to the residents.
Through the Planning Commission review and extensive community outreach and
involvement, the Circulation Element Update document is complete. Given the Housing
Element Update is close to adoption by the State, it is appropriate to bring forward the
Circulation Element Update document to the Planning Commission.
Environmental Review
Find this activity exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to
Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines because it has no potential to have a
significant effect on the environment. The activity is further statutorily exempt under Section
15262 of the State CEQA Guidelines, which exempts projects involving feasibility or
planning studies for future actions which the City has not approved or funded.
11
Public Notice
Given its Citywide nature, notice of this hearing was published in the Daily Pilot in a one-
eighth page format consistent with the provisions of the NBMC. Additionally, the item
appeared on the agenda for this meeting, which was posted at City Hall and on the City
website.
ATTACHMENTS
PC 1 Draft Resolution
PC 2 Redline Version of Circulation Element Update
PC 3 Archived Planning Commission Staff Reports
PC 4 Newport, Together Public Workshop Reports
Prepared by:
Submitted by:
12
Attachment No. PC 1
Draft Resolution
13
INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE14
RESOLUTION NO. PC2022-025
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE
CIRCULATION ELEMENT UPDATE (PA2017-141)
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HEREBY FINDS
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FACTS.
1. The Circulation Element is one of the mandatory elements of the General Plan that
must be periodically updated in accordance with state law.
2. The Circulation Element governs the long-term mobility system of the city. The
update of the Circulation Element presents a framework to evaluate, improve and
manage the circulation system to meet the current and future needs of the city.
3. The Draft Circulation Element Update (“Draft Circulation Element”) incorporates
the mandates of state law since the last update in 2006, including the following:
a. Section 65580 et seq. of the California Government Code (“State Housing
Element Law”) which requires each city and county to adopt a housing
element that identifies and analyzes existing and projected housing needs
within their jurisdiction and prepare goals, policies, and programs, and
quantified objectives to further the development, improvement, and
preservation of housing. As a result of State Housing Element Law, the City
of Newport Beach (“City”) is in the process of re-adopting the 6th Cycle
Housing Element covering the 2021-2029 period (“6th Cycle Housing
Element”) to accommodate the City’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment
(“RHNA”) allocation of 4,845 new housing units. The updated Goals and
Policies in the Draft Circulation Element support the 6th Cycle Housing
Element;
b. Senate Bill 743 (“SB 743”), which establishes Vehicle Miles Traveled
(“VMT”) as the metric for determining transportation impacts as part of a
California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) analysis;
c. Senate Bill 32 (“SB 32”) and Senate Bill 375 (“SB 375”) by supporting the
State’s climate action goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through
coordinated transportation and land use planning; and
d. Assembly Bill 1358 (“AB 1358”), commonly referred to as “The Complete
Streets Act of 2008,” by including goals and policies to plan for a balanced
15
multimodal transportation network that meets the needs of all users of
streets, roads, and highways for safe and convenient travel.
6. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65033, a robust public
participation effort concerning circulation and transportation issues throughout the
city started in November 2020. Since that time, the City of Newport Beach (“City”)
has held five community workshops and discussed the Circulation Element and
the project status at eight duly noticed Planning Commission meetings to receive
public input on the Draft Circulation Element.
7. The Draft Circulation Element was posted on the City’s website and was available
for public review from March 12, 2021, with comments accepted through the end
of April 2021. A revised draft of the Draft Circulation Element was posted on the
City’s website on July 12, 2022, for public review with comments accepted through
August 1, 2022.
8. On September 8, 2022, a public hearing was held in the Council Chambers located
at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and
purpose of the public hearing was given in accordance with California Government
Code Section 54950 et seq. (“Ralph M. Brown Act”) and 65353 of the Government
Code and consistent with City Council Policy K-1 (General Plan and Local Coastal
Program). Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by,
the Planning Commission at this hearing.
SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DETERMINATION
1. The Draft Circulation Element is not a project under CEQA pursuant to Section
15061(b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3
(“CEQA Guidelines”), the common-sense exemption because it involves goals,
policies, and programs that would not cause a significant effect on the
environment. Moreover, the Draft Circulation Element is statutorily exempt under
Section 15262 of the California CEQA Guidelines, which exempts projects
involving feasibility or planning studies for future actions which the City has not
approved or funded.
2. Section 423 of the Charter and Council Policy A-18 require any amendment to the
General Plan be reviewed to determine if a vote of the electorate would be
required. If a project includes a general plan amendment, and, separately or
cumulatively with other projects over a 10-year span, exceeds more than 100
additional peak hour trips (a.m. or p.m.), adds 40,000 square feet or more of non-
residential floor area or adds more than 100 dwelling units in a statistical area, a
vote of the electorate is required. because it involves policies, programs, and
actions to meet the City’s RHNA allocation that would not cause a significant effect
on the environment.
16
3. The 6th Cycle Housing Element adds at least 100 dwelling units in several
statistical areas; therefore, voter approval of amendments to the Land Use
Element and the Zoning Code will be required to implement the 6th Cycle Housing
Element. As currently drafted, the Draft Circulation Element is a policy document
that does not include any increases in a.m. or p.m. peak hour trips subject to voter
approval. It will not result in physical environmental impacts at this phase.
SECTION 3. DECISION
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. The Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach hereby finds that the Draft
Circulation Element is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to
projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment
pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3)) and is statutorily exempt pursuant to Section
15262 in accordance with the recitals under Section 2 of this Resolution.
2. The Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach hereby finds that the Draft
complies with all statutory requirements set forth in Section 65302(b) of the
Government Code.
3. In conformance with City Council Policy K-1, the Planning Commission reviewed
and recommended the City Council approve the General Plan Amendment to
update the Circulation Element by adoption of Resolution No. PC2022-025.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022.
BY: _________________________________
Lauren Kleiman, Chairman
BY: _________________________________
Mark Rosene, Secretary
Exhibit A: Circulation Element Update
17
EXHIBIT A
18
City of Newport BeachCIRCULATION ELEMENT
19
INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE20
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-2
CIRCULATION ELEMENT
A Safe and Convenient Transportation System for All
Introduction
The County of Orange continues to grow as a thriving urban residential and employment region. Over
the years, Newport Beach has transformed along with the County. Once a small community and seasonal
getaway, Newport Beach is now home to 86,000 residents and is a global destination for travel. As a result,
travel in Newport Beach and the surrounding communities has evolved. Demographics and technology
are changing the demand for and delivery of different travel modes. The legacy of the pandemic may also
further change travel demand and travel habits. The trend from regional and State levels of governments
has been to provide greater regulation regarding the planning and programming of transportation. The
Circulation Element of the Newport Beach General Plan governs the long-term development of mobility
systems in the City of Newport Beach and provides the best opportunity for the City to establish its vision
of mobility. The Circulation Element acknowledges the influences of local, regional, State and federal
guidance and regulation, and expresses the ultimate vision of mobility to respond to the needs and
objectives of Newport Beach residents. The goals and policies in the Circulation Element are balanced
with the goals and policies of the Land Use and Housing Elements in order to provide a correlation
between land use and transportation planning. In so doing the General Plan provides the best possible
balance between the City’s future growth, service levels for all travel modes, and community character.
The Circulation Element is consistent with the Complete Streets Act (Assembly Bill 1358), the Sustainable
Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (Senate Bill 375), the Vehicle Miles Traveled provisions
of Senate Bill 743, the Transportation Demand Management Ordinance, and the Local Coastal Program.
21
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-3
Context
SETTING
Newport Beach is centrally located among the six coastal cities in Orange County. The City of Newport
Beach was incorporated in 1906, only ten years after Henry Ford built his first automobile. The community
has changed along with transportation options from days of the Pacific Electric Red Car to wide adoption
and then reliance on automobiles. Even as freeways came to symbolize Southern California, no freeways
traversed Newport Beach until the Corona Del Mar Freeway opened in 1978 providing a short connection
between MacArthur Boulevard and the San Diego Freeway (I-405). Today, the Costa Mesa freeway (SR-
55) terminates just north of Newport Beach and the San Joaquin Transportation Corridor (SR-73)
traverses the city’s northern edge. Newport Beach instead relies on regional roadways for connections and
transportation including Coast Highway, Newport Boulevard, Jamboree Road, and MacArthur
Boulevard). In the future, emerging technology and greater access for alternative transportation modes
are anticipated to affect and be affected by Newport Beach as it grows.
Newport Beach is a collection of villages and
neighborhoods including Balboa Peninsula, Cannery
Village, the Islands of Newport Harbor, Mariners’ Mile,
Newport Heights, Dover Shores, Corona Del Mar,
Newport Coast, Newport Center/Fashion Island, Big
Canyon, Back Bay, and Eastbluff. These neighborhoods
rely on local streets for transportation and are connected
by regional roadways. Regional traffic also uses the
regional roadways, which has reduced the City’s ability to
allocate space to alternative travel modes. Summertime beach traffic has been a predictable source of
traffic volumes near or exceeding roadway capacity in the beach areas for a century.
Growth in Orange County, and especially communities neighboring Newport Beach will increase regional
through traffic and summertime beach traffic. These increases will occur whether or not Newport Beach
plans for it. This Circulation Element plans for anticipated regional growth and seeks regional cooperation
to accommodate regional traffic growth.
Roads have been the primary means of getting around Newport Beach, but Newport Harbor presents an
opportunity for community specific transportation and recreation alternatives. Water transportation
between Newport Beach and Santa Catalina Island, harbors and ports up and down Southern California,
and between Balboa Island and the Balboa Peninsula is already present. More water transportation services
(public or private) could be established between locations in Newport Beach to reduce the reliance on
roadways.
22
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-4
LOCAL ROADWAY SYSTEM
Local roadways are planned to accommodate traffic circulating the local village or neighborhood they
serve. Keeping regional traffic off of local streets preserves right-of-way for its intended use and for use
by other transportation modes. In recognition of the need to discourage non-local cut-through traffic
from using residential streets, the City Council adopted Policy L-26 (Traffic Management Policy) in 2006
(amended in 2015 and 2018). This policy provides tools and a process for managing the speed and volume
of vehicles on residential streets and implementing considered responses that do not simply shift cut-
through traffic from one residential street to another.
ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
Much of the traffic traversing Newport Beach uses regional roadways, simply passing through town.
Regional serving roadways are categorized according to the type and quantity of traffic they are designed
to accommodate through the roadway classification system adopted in the City of Newport Beach Master
Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). The roadway classifications used by the City of Newport Beach
are required to be consistent with the County of Orange Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH), which
is administered by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). OCTA is the regional agency
responsible for overseeing the regional transportation system and local agency compliance with regional
and statewide programs such as the Congestion Management Program (CMP). The roadway classifications
and their generalized daily capacity, used for long range General Plan analysis, are presented below.
Roadways may be able to carry traffic above the typical capacity level identified in these basic classifications
if the standard section is augmented. Augmented sections could include additional through lanes,
additional turning lanes at intersections with high turning volumes, or through signal synchronization.
Principal Arterial—A Principal arterial highway is typically an eight-lane divided roadway. A Principal
arterial is designed to accommodate a daily capacity ranging from 45,000 to 60,000. Principal arterials carry
a large volume of regional through traffic not handled by the freeway system.
Major Arterial— A Major arterial highway is typically a six-lane divided roadway. A Major arterial is
designed to accommodate a daily capacity ranging from 30,000 to 45,000. Major arterials carry a large
volume of regional through traffic not handled by the freeway system. A Major Augmented is similar to a
Major arterial, but may include additional lanes, particularly at intersections, resulting in a daily capacity
ranging from 52,000 to 70,000.
Primary Arterial— A Primary arterial highway is usually a four-lane divided roadway. A Primary arterial
is designed to accommodate a daily capacity ranging from 20,000 to 30,000. A Primary arterial’s function
is similar to that of a Principal or Major arterial. The chief difference is capacity. A Primary Augmented is
similar to a Primary arterial, but may include additional lanes, particularly at intersections, resulting in a
daily capacity ranging from 35,000 to 50,000.
Secondary Arterial— A Secondary arterial highway is a four-lane roadway (often undivided). A
Secondary arterial distributes traffic between local streets and Major or Primary arterials. Although some
23
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-5
Secondary arterials serve as through routes, most provide more direct access to surrounding land uses
than Principal, Major, or Primary arterials. Secondary arterials carry a daily capacity ranging from 10,000
to 20,000.
Commuter Roadway—A commuter roadway is a two-to-four-lane, unrestricted access roadway with a
daily capacity ranging from 7,500 to 15,000. It differs from a local street in its ability to handle through
traffic movements between arterials.
ROADWAY OPERATIONS
The efficient operation of the circulation system is constrained by conflict and congestion at intersections.
Intersections that do not perform well can affect roadway conditions upstream and downstream, impact
access to adjacent parcels, increase vehicle collisions, present safety hazards to other travel modes, and
concentrate air pollution. Conflict and congestion are usually the result of traffic volume. The residents
of Newport Beach desire good traffic flow and the ability to get from one side of the city to the other.
However, there are impediments to this.
In Newport Beach, natural barriers (including the Pacific Ocean, the Santa Ana River, and Upper Newport
Bay) and the John Wayne Airport superblock limit roadway connections. As a result, traffic volumes are
concentrated on the roadways making regional connections (i.e., Coast Highway, Bristol Street/SR-73,
Newport Boulevard, Jamboree Road, and MacArthur Boulevard) which increases conflict and congestion
at intersections along these routes. Because other coastal communities have similar barriers, regional traffic
with no origin or destination in Newport Beach also uses these limited connections through Newport
Beach, further increasing traffic. Summertime beach traffic is not affected by Newport Beach land use
policy. For that reason, it has been and continues to be the practice of the City to analyze traffic conditions
outside of the summer season to determine the function and operation of City streets.
The Highway Capacity Manual provides methodology for measuring intersection performance in terms
of delay experienced by vehicles traversing the intersection. As detailed below, letter grades are assigned
based on the amount of delay experienced by vehicles during the peak commute hours. Unlike school
grades, however, level of service A is not necessarily a goal. An intersection performing at level of service
A could indicate that too much right-of-way is dedicated to vehicle travel lanes and not enough right-of-
way is dedicated to other travel modes such as bicycles and pedestrians.
LOS “A”—Minimal delay (less than 10 seconds on average) is experienced.
LOS “B”—Vehicles at signalized intersections experience between 10 and 20 seconds of delay on
average, while vehicles on the side street STOP controlled approaches at unsignalized intersections
experience between 10 and 15 seconds of average delay.
LOS “C”—Delays at signalized intersections range from 20 to 35 seconds and from 15 to 25
seconds for side street / STOP controlled traffic at unsignalized intersections.
LOS “D”—Delays at signalized intersections range from 35 to 55 seconds and from 25 to 35
seconds for side street / STOP controlled approaches at unsignalized intersections.
24
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-6
LOS “E”—Delays at signalized intersections range from 55 to 80 seconds on average, while delays
for side street / STOP controlled traffic at unsignalized intersections range from 35 to 50 seconds.
LOS “F”—All vehicles at signalized intersections can be expected to wait through more than a
single signal cycle with average delays in excess of 80 seconds, while delays to side street / STOP
controlled approaches at unsignalized intersections will exceed 50 seconds on average.
The City of Newport Beach has traditionally set LOS D as its goal for intersection performance where
possible. Establishing and maintaining a target requires a balance between goals such as accessibility for
all travel modes congestion, delay, emergency response, community character, and capital expenditure. It
is also important to recognize that some sources of traffic (such as summertime beach traffic) may expand
to use any new capacity provided. In the past, LOS E was established as the goal in the airport area and
at specific intersections in Corona del Mar to achieve the desired balance.
A traffic analysis of the General Plan update will forecast future traffic volumes, analyze intersection
performance, and identify necessary roadway and intersection improvements to maintain LOS D. Once
those needs are determined, the City of Newport Beach will consider all goals and will review the Master
Plan of Streets and Highways.
Recently, the State has made changes to the measurement of transportation impacts under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As of July 2020, all jurisdictions must analyze vehicle miles traveled
(VMT) for the purposes of CEQA. While VMT contributes to congestion, by itself it cannot be used to
measure congestion impacts or congestion relief. VMT is a good measure of effects contributing to climate
change. Newport Beach is concerned about climate change and sea level rise and adopted the Vehicle
Miles Traveled Implementation Guide in May 2020 and requires the analysis of VMT for the purposes of
CEQA. However, Newport Beach originally established the Traffic Phasing Ordinance in 1978, which
requires analysis of vehicle LOS when planning transportation improvements in coordination with land
use development. In addition, vehicle LOS analysis is still required by the Orange County CMP. Therefore,
the City of Newport Beach requires the analysis of VMT for the purposes of CEQA and also requires the
analysis of vehicle LOS for compliance with the Traffic Phasing Ordinance and the CMP.
SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH
The Safe System approach takes a holistic approach to reduce fatal and serious injuries occurring on
roadways. The first core principle of the Safe System approach is to view fatal and serious injuries as
unacceptable and accept the ethical imperative to reduce and eliminate their occurrence. Human bodies,
especially those using non-motorized transportation, are vulnerable and have limited tolerance for crash
forces before sustaining serious injury. Because humans make mistakes, transportation systems should be
designed to accommodate those mistakes and limit crash forces. Designing for safety should be proactive
with risks identified and mitigated rather than reacting after crashes. The responsibility for safety is shared
by roadway users, roadway managers, and vehicle manufacturers. Designing for safety also means planning
for redundancy so that one failure does not necessitate a bad outcome. The Safe System approach adds
25
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-7
layers of protection by improving the safety of roadway users, vehicles, travel speeds, and roadway design
while also improving post-crash care.
In the past, roadway speeds were set by roadway users through speed surveys conducted according to the
California Vehicle Code and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Assembly Bill
43 (Friedman) was signed into law in 2021 and will permit local agencies more flexibility starting in 2024
to consider vulnerable groups when setting lower speed limits than identified by speed surveys. The City
of Newport Beach will incorporate traffic safety improvement projects in the annual Capital Improvement
Program and will consider vulnerable groups when setting speed limits when permitted by State law,
consistent with a Safe Systems approach.
TRUCK TRAFFIC
Trucks are necessary to deliver goods, collect refuse, and service utilities throughout Newport Beach.
Truck trips can, however, result in noise and other impacts to residents, increase traffic congestion, and
shorten the lifespan of infrastructure. Commercial vehicles weighing in excess of 3 tons (6,000 pounds)
are prohibited from certain roadways, when posted. Concentrated periods of high truck traffic, such as
during construction of large development projects, have increased potential for noise, congestion, and
roadway damage impacts. The City of Newport Beach could control and limit those impacts by reviewing
and approving construction management plans for large development projects in addition to monitoring
construction traffic associated with residential projects.
REGIONAL FACILITIES
Many different agencies plan and operate regional transportation facilities that are used by residents of
Newport Beach and vehicles passing through Newport Beach. These include the State, the Southern
California Association of Governments (SCAG), OCTA, the Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA),
and neighboring cities. The County of Orange owns and operates John Wayne Airport, which is a
generator of special use traffic neighboring Newport Beach. The City of Newport Beach coordinates with
outside agencies on matters relevant to the mobility of Newport Beach residents.
The State, through the California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans), is the owner/operator of major regional routes used
by Newport Beach residents including I-405, SR-55, Newport
Boulevard, and Coast Highway. Coast Highway is owned and
operated by Caltrans with the exception of the segment between
Jamboree Road and Newport Coast Drive. Newport Boulevard
from Finley Street to the northerly city limits at Industrial Way is
also under Caltrans jurisdiction. Caltrans controls the signal timing and signal coordination along these
roadways. The City of Newport Beach coordinates with Caltrans related to signal timing and seeks greater
coordination related to incorporating emerging technology and the latest transportation system
management techniques.
26
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-8
SCAG is the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for preparing the Regional
Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) for Southern California. The
RTP/SCS is prepared every four years and outlines the region’s vision for use of regional facilities and
delivery of mobility. The City of Newport Beach provides local data for the RTP/SCS process to ensure
Newport Beach is accurately represented and provides feedback on draft strategies.
As previously mentioned, OCTA is the regional agency responsible for overseeing the regional
transportation system, the County Master Plan of Arterial Highways, and local agency compliance with
regional and statewide programs such as the CMP, which is prepared every two years. The CMP roadways
within Newport Beach are Coast Highway, Newport Boulevard, MacArthur Boulevard, and Jamboree
Road. The City of Newport Beach provides local data for the CMP preparation. OCTA also prepares a
Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) every four years that establishes a vision for Orange County
mobility that is submitted to SCAG for inclusion in the RTP/SCS. The City of Newport Beach monitors
the LRTP and provides feedback related to the needs of Newport Beach residents. The TCA operates the
San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor (SR-73). The City of Newport Beach is a partner in this joint
powers’ authority.
OCTA provides a forum for communication and coordination between neighboring jurisdictions for the
efficient delivery of mobility across jurisdictional borders through regional plans such as the MPAH,
Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan, and OC Go. One example of effective cross-jurisdictional
coordination has been the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program. The City of Newport Beach
coordinates with neighboring jurisdictions seeking effective planning and delivery of transportation
facilities.
JWA is a part of the regional system of airports serving air travel for Orange County residents, workers,
and visitors. The Newport Beach Aviation Committee assists the City in the implementation of Council
Policy A-17 (Newport Beach Council Airport Policy).
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
Fixed route bus service and on-demand paratransit in Newport Beach (and all of Orange County) is
operated by OCTA. One of the bus routes in Newport Beach connects the Newport Transportation
Center (located at MacArthur Boulevard and San Joaquin Hills Road
in Newport Center) to the countywide bus network. In order
to maintain State mandated revenue/cost balance, OCTA
occasionally revises their service schedule. During periods of
increased public transportation use, service routes are extended and
new routes may be added. During periods of decreased public
transportation use, service areas with the lowest ridership are contracted. OCTA’s
most recent review of bus service, the Bus 360 program, concentrated bus service in the central part of
Orange County and reduced bus service in South Orange County and the periphery.
27
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-9
OC Go Project V provides funding for community-based transit/circulators. The
Newport Beach summer shuttle service on the Balboa Peninsula is partially funded
by Project V. The City of Newport Beach would consider pilot programs for other
shuttle routes, potentially connecting the villages within Newport Beach.
The extensive use of rideshare services has been one of the factors leading to declining
bus ridership. As part of the Bus 360 program, OCTA even tested use of rideshare
operators to provide on-demand mobility service in lieu of reduced fixed route
service. In some markets, rideshare drivers have begun offering subscription rates for
customers with regular medical appointments. The trend is clearly toward more trips being taken with this
travel mode and the City of Newport Beach is considering ways to accommodate the demand such as
designating curbside drop-off zones in commercial areas.
TRAILS
Trail systems provide functional alternatives to automobile travel and recreational
opportunities for the community. The trail system in Newport Beach has been
developed for commuter and recreational bicyclists, pedestrians, and equestrians.
Bicycle Trails
This Circulation Element incorporates the 2014 City of Newport Beach Bicycle
Master Plan and any future updates to that plan. The Bicycle Master Plan identifies
four types of bicycle facilities.
1. Bicycle Path (Caltrans Class I). Provides for bicycle travel on a paved
right-of-way separated from any street or highway. Includes sidewalk
adjacent to street.
2. Bicycle Lane (Caltrans Class II). Provides a striped and stenciled lane for
bicycle travel on a street or highway.
3. Bicycle Route (Caltrans Class III). Provides for a shared use with motor
vehicle traffic and may be identified by signing. Stencil markings identifying
a recommended position for bicycles may also be provided.
4. Bicycle Trail. Provides a dirt pathway designated for the use of bicycles and
pedestrians completely separated from motor vehicle traffic.
Subsequent to adoption of the Bicycle Master Plan, Caltrans has included an
additional classification of bicycle facility in the Highway Design Manual and
California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. A Class IV Bikeway (also
known as a cycle track) is an on-road facility separated from vehicle traffic by a
physical barrier. The City may incorporate this type of facility into the Bicycle Master Plan in the future.
Bicycle Path,
Caltrans Class I
Bicycle Lane,
Caltrans Class II
Bicycle Route,
Caltrans Class III
28
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-10
The facility needs of bicyclists vary with the function of the trip and the speed and
skill level of the rider. Those residents who use bicycles daily for their primary
means of transportation likely prefer the most convenient and direct route
available to their destination. These bicyclists normally will select a route along a
primary or a major highway. In contrast, the recreational rider might choose a
route for its scenic interest such as a ride on a bike trail separated from vehicular
traffic. New or infrequent bicycle riders may prefer a route separated from vehicle
travel or along a route with low vehicle volume and speeds. Thus, it is necessary
to provide bikeways for bicyclists along major transportation corridors as well as
alternative routes. It is also necessary to provide bikeways which separate faster
cyclists from pedestrian travel and slower cyclists, integrating bicycle travel more
closely with vehicular traffic, and bikeways which separate slower cyclists from
motor vehicle traffic.
The City has designated additional off-road facilities in the form of sidewalk bikeways, which provide
improved bicycle safety for children within high use corridors in the vicinity of schools, beaches, and
residential neighborhoods. The City will periodically review the Bicycle Sidewalk Resolution to determine
whether areas permitting bicycle use on sidewalks are serving the intended purpose, whether additional
permitted areas are desirable, and whether restrictions on use (e.g., bicycle speed limits) are warranted.
Review of the Bicycle Sidewalk Resolution and strategies for separating faster cyclists from pedestrians
and slower cyclists will become more important due to the emergence of electric-assisted bicycles (e-
bikes).
Researchers have noted the rapid uptake of e-bikes by consumers, that
e-bikes are more likely than standard bicycles to replace car trips, and that
trips with e-bikes are longer than trips with standard bicycles. The
availability of e-bikes also expands the potential group of users of bicycle
facilities and the range of all users of those facilities. This emerging
technology may improve the mobility of Newport Beach residents, but the
City would like to ensure that the benefits to some do not come at the
expense of safety to other users and residents.
Pedestrian Corridors
Newport Beach has a variety of pedestrian and multi-use facilities. These include sidewalks through
developed areas, the oceanfront boardwalk on the Balboa Peninsula, bayfront walkways, and trails along
Upper Newport Bay and in open space areas. Coastal areas see high pedestrian activity including Balboa
Island, Balboa Peninsula, Corona del Mar, and Mariners’ Mile. High volumes of pedestrians cross Coast
Highway through Mariners’ Mile. Where there are opportunities, the City of Newport Beach will consider
providing more Bayfront walkways along the Balboa Peninsula and Mariners’ Mile. These walkways will
help to accommodate high pedestrian volumes while also providing an alternative network separate from
high vehicle volume streets. Closing low volume minor streets and alleys and creating pedestrian
29
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-11
promenades or activity areas can also be a strategy to create a pedestrian friendly network while activating
a business district. In addition, overhead pedestrian crossings should be considered to improve pedestrian
safety.
Equestrian Trails
Equestrian trails are primarily located in the Santa Ana Heights portion of the City. These trails, and other
equestrian facilities, are highly valued by residents of this area and provide regional recreation
opportunities as well.
COMPLETE STREETS
While alternative modes such as bicycles have always been permitted to use the roadway network, the
Complete Streets Act (Assembly Bill 1358) requires that Circulation Elements “plan for a balanced
multimodal transportation network that meets the needs of all users of streets, roads, and highways,
defined to include motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists, children, persons with disabilities, seniors, movers of
commercial goods, and users of public transportation, in a manner that is suitable to the rural, suburban,
or urban context of the general plan.” Providing a balance for multiple modes is one strategy toward
reducing greenhouse gas emissions and combating climate change consistent with the City’s goals of
reducing risks to residents from climate change and sea level rise. Additionally, research shows that a
multimodal transportation system, encouraging choice of bicycle walking and rolling modes, can enhance
local economic development and improve public health. The City of Newport Beach will use the Orange
County Council of Governments (OCCOG) Complete Streets Initiative Design Handbook to develop
the City’s complete streets master plan.
Planning for a balanced multimodal transportation network does not mean that every street allocates equal
space to all travel modes. In fact, satisfactory service levels are difficult to provide on all streets for all
travel modes due to the competing interests between modes. Automobile friendly streets have high travel
speeds, wide lanes, and separate turn lanes all of which decrease pedestrian service levels. Rather than
trying to simultaneously serve competing needs, the City of Newport Beach favors a layered network
approach to complete streets planning. In a layered network, a street is prioritized for a particular travel
30
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-12
mode (or multiple travel modes benefiting from similar characteristics), but the network as a whole
provides for the mobility of all users of roadways.
EMERGING TECHNOLOGY
The City of Newport Beach has used and continues to use technology to improve the delivery and
performance of mobility. Transportation System Management techniques have been used to enhance
capacity without physical roadway widening while retaining the community character and limiting the
impact of the roadway system on the environment. Examples of Transportation System Management
improvements include intelligent transportation system improvements at traffic signals, traffic signal
coordination and improvements to roadway signage along busy routes (especially to tourist destinations),
and the completion of the traffic management center in City Hall allowing for traffic monitoring and
remote signal operation. The City also replaced old street lighting to more efficient LED fixtures to reduce
electricity consumption and the City’s carbon footprint.
Technology is changing rapidly, and the City of Newport Beach will respond to the challenges and
opportunities presented by emerging technology. The number of electric vehicles (EV) using our roadways
will continue to grow and have fueling needs that are distinct from gasoline powered vehicles. Rideshare
services continue to grow ridership and simultaneously the need for designated places to drop-off and
pick-up are growing. Wayfinding apps help people to navigate our roadways, but the directions provided
do not always show the most direct route or respect roadway classification. Traditional engineering
techniques may not be effective in redirecting this source of traffic volume and the City of Newport Beach
is investigating potential strategies.
Vehicles with limited self-driving capability are already on our roadways. On the horizon, the City
anticipates that vehicle-to-everything (V2X) infrastructure improvements will be needed to accommodate
and realize the advantages offered by connected and autonomous vehicles. Potential advantages from
connected vehicles include feedback regarding roadway maintenance needs, uniform traffic flows, real
time signal synchronization, improved safety for drivers and other travel modes, and reduced GHG
emissions. While the City of Newport Beach is aware of what is happening now and what is anticipated
in the near future, the City must remain flexible and adapt to rapidly changing transportation options in
order to experience the benefits offered while avoiding the pitfalls of change.
TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT
The City of Newport Beach retains the Travel Demand Management (TDM) Ordinance requiring projects
to reduce the number of peak-period vehicle trips by providing facilities to support alternate modes and
encouraging the use of alternative transportation modes, such as carpools, vanpools, public transit,
bicycles, and walking. Employers can also offer flexible work schedules, including work-from-home. Some
TDM strategies will reduce VMT generated by a land use. All of these techniques are enhanced by
emerging technologies. Adopting TDM measures not only reduces peak-period vehicle trips and
associated GHG emissions but could also reduce parking demand.
31
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-13
CURB SIDE MANAGEMENT
Newport Beach manages curb side space seeking the best use for the community needs. Prohibitions, fee
assessment, or time limits are used to induce turnover and ensure availability, perform maintenance such
as street sweeping, preserve sight distance, or provide right-turn lanes.
Within commercial districts, time limitations and metered parking are common. Novel parking
management may provide greater benefit to Newport Beach residents and visitors. Strategies such as valet
and loading zones could reduce vehicle loads on side streets and alleys. Designating rideshare or delivery
space could accommodate emerging trends. Curb side right of way could also be used as exchange areas
for shared non-motorized transportation. Some of these novel parking management strategies could
reduce passenger car use.
Within residential districts, parking demand can overflow from commercial districts or private residential
property onto public residential streets. Management of curb side right of way can help to provide equal
access for all of the district’s residents.
CLIMATE CHANGE
Newport Beach is concerned about climate change and sea level rise. As seen in other parts of the country,
climate change can increase the frequency and intensity of natural emergencies. The City of Newport
Beach is planning for these contingencies using tsunami warning signs, evacuation planning and battery
back-up systems for traffic signals. Initiatives included in the Circulation Element such as planning for a
balanced multimodal network including support for additional transit facilities in higher density areas and
measures to reduce VMT help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change. The City
of Newport Beach intends to do more to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change.
On City property, the City can provide more EV charging stations, bicycle parking, and other supporting
facilities. The City can encourage or require these supporting facilities on privately owned property within
Newport Beach. The City can also encourage local businesses to establish and maintain telework programs
in addition to carpooling/vanpooling.
PARKING
Similar to other coastal communities, parking availability is limited citywide, especially in some areas during
the peak summer months. Areas of Newport Beach that were largely subdivided prior to widespread
adoption of the automobile are areas of particular concern (i.e., Balboa Peninsula, Balboa Island, and
Corona Del Mar). The Balboa Village Parking Management Overlay Plan included recommendations. The
City of Newport Beach has implemented some of the recommendations (i.e., beginning to implement
parking meter time limits, providing bus layover areas, improving intersection visibility with additional red
curbing, and monitoring lot utilization). Implementing additional recommendations is being considered
including increasing parking meter fees, consolidating public parking, and initiating a shared parking
32
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-14
program. Similar Parking Management Overlay plans could be implemented in other activity areas
including Corona del Mar, Mariners’ Mile, McFadden Wharf, Cannery Village, and Balboa Island.
Technology changes make other innovative solutions possible. The City of Newport Beach uses a
smartphone app to allow remote payment of fees at parking meters, which has increased compliance. This
program could be expanded to provide the location of and directions to available parking spaces, which
could reduce circling while looking for a parking space and the congestion those movements cause.
Increased use of rideshare services may reduce parking demand for some land uses or in some areas of
Newport Beach. Future review of off-street parking requirements may allow reuse of vehicle parking
spaces for bicycle parking or could permit reallocation of curbside space. Alternatives for management of
curbside space include valet or rideshare pick-up/drop-off and deliveries, further supporting a trend
toward less private vehicle parking.
TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
Newport Beach receives funding for transportation improvements from gasoline tax apportionment
(including SB-1), OC Go (also known as Measure M) local turnback, OC Go competitive programs, the
State, federal funds, developer fees (i.e., the Traffic Phasing Ordinance and Fair Share Traffic Contribution
Ordinance), and the General Fund. The City of Newport Beach leverages City resources to improve the
chances of winning competitive funding sources (e.g., MacArthur Boulevard improvements, Superior
Avenue pedestrian bridge, and more). The effect of revisions to CEQA measuring transportation impacts
in terms of VMT on developer fees is not known at this time. A regional VMT mitigation program, if
established, may offer a new funding source for public transit or alternative transportation projects.
The City of Newport Beach will have additional expenditures in the future to adapt existing infrastructure
with emerging technology, including traffic signal improvements for compatibility with connected and
autonomous vehicles. The City of Newport Beach is considering potential sources of funding for these
expenditures.
33
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-15
Goals and Policies
Mobility
Goal
CE 1.1
An overall transportation system that facilitates the movement of people and goods within and through
the City of Newport Beach and accommodates conservative growth within the City of Newport Beach
but is not expanded primarily to accommodate growth in the surrounding region.
Policies
CE 1.1.1 Comprehensive Transportation System
Provide a diverse transportation system that provides mobility options for the
community. (Imp 16.8, 16.11)
CE 1.1.2 Integrated System of Multiple Modes
Provide an integrated transportation system that supports the land use plan
set forth in the Land Use Element. (Imp 2.1)
CE 1.1.3 Levels of Service Related to Community Character
Maintain level of service standards that reflect the character of the various
unique districts and neighborhoods of Newport Beach. (Imp 16.2, 16.4, 16.6,
16.7)
Goal
CE 1.2
Reduced summertime visitor traffic impacts.
Policies
CE 1.2.1 Wayfinding
Implement way-finding signs for
vehicles and pedestrians, specifi-
cally for tourist destination areas.
(Imp 16.7)
34
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-16
CE 1.2.2 Shuttle Service
Encourage and maintain remote visitor parking and shuttle services. (Imp 14.4)
CE 1.2.3 Internal Shuttle
Study the potential of implementing a pilot program, for a shuttle system
connecting the villages of Newport Beach. (Imp 16.8)
CE 1.2.4 Traffic System Management
Continue to implement measures, such as special traffic signal timing, to
reduce the impact of high-volume summer traffic on persons living along and
around the beach and bay, as well as visitors. (Imp 16.7)
CE 1.2.5 Public Transit
Support and encourage OCTA efforts to provide/fund
summertime expanded bus service and/or local shuttle
services to reduce visitor traffic. (Imp 16.8)
Roadway System
Goal
CE 2.1
A roadway system with no significant gaps that provides for the efficient movement of goods and people
in the City of Newport Beach, while maintaining the community’s character and its residents’ quality of
life.
Policies
CE 2.1.1 Level of Service Standards
Plan the arterial roadway system to accommodate projected traffic at the
following level of service standards:
A. Level of Service (LOS) “D” throughout the City, unless otherwise noted
B. LOS “E” at any intersection in the Airport Area shared with Irvine, and
in Corona del Mar (subject to findings of the most recent General Plan
update traffic study) (Imp 16.3)
CE 2.1.2 Street and Highway Network
Construct the circulation system described on the map entitled Newport
Beach Circulation Element-Master Plan of Streets and Highways shown in
Figure CE1 and Figure CE2 (cross-section). (Imp 14.9, 16.3)
35
INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE36
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
IS
L
E
PI E R
CO R ON A
N EW PO R T
CRY S T A L CO V EW EST
J
E
T
TY
SH O R E S
L ID O
City
of
Newport
Beach
FASHION
E
A
S
T
JET
T
Y
IS LA N D
NE W P O R T
RI D G E
HA R B O R
BI
G
NE W PO R T
PI E R
IS L A N D
D U N ES
N O R TH
R I V ER J ET T Y
IS LA N D
LID O
C O L L I N S
PE N I N SU LA
City
of
Irvine
S T A T E P A RK
BAL
B
O
A
I
S
L
A
N
D
ISLAND
IS L E
ST
A
R
CO R ON A
WE D G E
BE AC H
L IN D A
TH
E
NE W PO R T
NE W P O R T C O AS T
CA M E O
BA LB O A
BA
Y
SA N T A AN A
LIT T LE
SH O R E S
C R YST AL C O VE ST AT E P AR K
BigC
a
n
y
o
n
Sp
y
g
l
a
s
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
Bu ck G u l ly
NE
W
P
O
R
T
J O A Q U I N
CH
A
N
N
E
L
B A Y
BIG
BA
S
I
N
C
A
N
Y
O
N
SA
N
D
I
E
G
O
C
R
E
E
K
SA N
ISLAND
(Dr y)
BA
L
B
O
A
U P P E R
W
E
S
T
L
I
D
O
C
H
A
N
N
E
L
CH
A
N
N
E
L
HA R B O R
E
NT
R
A
N
C
E
TU R N I N G
C
HAN
N
ELR E S E R V O IR
LID
O
P A C I F I C O C E A N
R E S E R V O I R
N
E
W
P
O
R
T
WESTNEWPORTBLVDSUPERIORAVENUE ANAAVENUEIRVINEAVENUECAMPUSDRIVE
FORD
ROAD
MACARTHURBLVDSA
N
J
O
A
Q
U
I
NROAD
SAN
JOAQUIN
HILLS
TRANSPORTATION
CORRID
O
R
NEWPORT COASTDRIVEHIGHWAYJAMBOREEROAD I R V I N E
C O S T A M E S A SANTAHILLS
Text§¨¦405
ÄÆ55
ÄÆ73
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
IS
L
E
PI E R
CO R ON A
N EW PO R T
CRY S T A L CO V EW EST
J
E
T
TY
SH O R E S
L ID O
City
of
Newport
Beach
FASHION
E
A
S
T
JET
T
Y
IS LA N D
NE W P O R T
RI D G E
HA R B O R
BI
G
NE W PO R T
PI E R
IS L A N D
D U N ES
N O R TH
R I V ER J ET T Y
IS LA N D
LID O
C O L L I N S
PE N I N SU LA
City
of
Irvine
S T A T E P A RK
BAL
B
O
A
I
S
L
A
N
D
ISLAND
IS L E
ST
A
R
CO R ON A
WE D G E
BE AC H
L IN D A
TH
E
NE W PO R T
NE W P O R T C O AS T
CA M E O
BA LB O A
BA
Y
SA N T A AN A
LIT T LE
SH O R E S
C R YST AL C O VE ST AT E P AR K
BigC
a
n
y
o
n
Sp
y
g
l
a
s
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
Bu ck G u l ly
NE
W
P
O
R
T
J O A Q U I N
CH
A
N
N
E
L
B A Y
BIG
BA
S
I
N
C
A
N
Y
O
N
SA
N
D
I
E
G
O
C
R
E
E
K
SA N
ISLAND
(Dr y)
BA
L
B
O
A
U P P E R
W
E
S
T
L
I
D
O
C
H
A
N
N
E
L
CH
A
N
N
E
L
HA R B O R
E
NT
R
A
N
C
E
TU R N I N G
C
HAN
N
ELR E S E R V O IR
LID
O
P A C I F I C O C E A N
R E S E R V O I R
N
E
W
P
O
R
T
WESTNEWPORTBLVDSUPERIORAVENUE ANAAVENUEIRVINEAVENUECAMPUSDRIVE
FORD
ROAD
MACARTHURBLVDSA
N
J
O
A
Q
U
I
NROAD
SAN
JOAQUIN
HILLS
TRANSPORTATION
CORRID
O
R
NEWPORT COASTDRIVEHIGHWAYJAMBOREEROAD I R V I N E
C O S T A M E S A SANTAHILLS
Text§¨¦405
ÄÆ55
ÄÆ73
CITY of NEWPORT BEACHGENERAL PLAN
Source: City of Newport Beach
Date: 7/28/22
7N
Figure CE1MASTER PLAN OFSTREETS AND HIGHWAYS
0 0.5 1
Miles
Legend
!(ADOPTED INTERCHANGE
!(PROPOSED INTERCHANGE
ROUTES REQUIRINGFURTHER COORDINATION0.75 Miles
COMMUTER ROADWAY (TWO LANE UNDIVIDED)3.24 MilesSECONDARY ROAD(FOUR LANE UNDIVIDED) 16.88 MilesSECONDARY (NOT BUILT) 0.28 Miles
PRIMARY ROAD(FOUR LANE DIVIDED)29.62 Miles
PRIMARY ROAD (NOT BUILT) 3.29 MilesMAJOR ROAD (SIX LANE DIVIDED) 30.64 MilesEIGHT LANE ROAD(DIVIDED) 2.81 Miles
SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR 5.32 MilesADOPTED FREEWAY ROUTES4.48 MilesFUTURE FREEWAY EXTENSION0.75 Miles
Amendments Approved by City Council
Amendment No.
45923 (portion)23 (portion)77-1-B78-1-C79-281-2-F82-184-185-1-B86-2-A87-1-E-189-1-G89-2- J90-2-B98-3-D2006-005
Date
07-22-7407-22-7412-09-7403-10-7503-24-7503-28-7708-14-7812-08-9002-11-8510-24-8309-24-8407-14-8607-14-8609-28-8707-24-8909-10-9009-10-9009-13-9907-25-06
Resolution No.
8314831583988448845890359411993385-783-10484-11486-5586-5787-14689-8290-8690-8799-632006-76
37
INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE38
CITY of NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL PLAN
PROJECT NUMBER:
Source: LSA Associates
Date: 07/18/22
Figure CE2
Not to Scale
GENERAL PLAN
NOTE: AUGMENTED SECTIONS MAY INCLUDE ADDITIONAL LANES AT
INTERSECTION, AS NECESSARY.
ROADWAY
CROSS-SECTIONS
LaneLane
COMMUTER - 60’
(2 Lanes Divided)
LaneLaneLaneLane
SECONDARY - 84’
(4 Lanes Undivided)
LaneLane LaneLane
PRIMARY - 104’
(4 Lanes Divided)
LaneLaneLane LaneLaneLane
MAJOR - 128’
(6 Lanes Divided)
Lane LaneLaneLaneLaneLaneLaneLane
PRINCIPAL - 144’
(8 Lanes Divided)
I:\CNB1702.04\G\Circ Element\CE_Cross_Sections.ai (8/10/2022)39
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-19
CE 2.1.3 Current Traffic Data
Monitor traffic conditions on an ongoing basis and update Master Plan as
necessary. (Imp 16.4)
CE 2.1.4 Roadway Improvements
Pursue construction of intersection improvements (subject to findings of the
most recent General Plan update traffic study) or alternate improvements that
achieve an acceptable level of service. (Imp 16.3)
CE 2.1.5 MacArthur Boulevard Widening
Plan the addition of lanes to MacArthur Boulevard between Harbor View
Drive and the prolongation of Crown Drive so that more than four lanes are
constructed only when the daily volume to capacity ratio equals or exceeds 1.0
in that section of MacArthur Boulevard, not counting trips generated by the
MacArthur Boulevard access drive to Corona del mar Plaza, and after public
hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council, and only by
narrowing the median. (Imp 16.3)
CE 2.1.6 Protection of Right-of-Way
Protect right-of-way for designated future streets and highways through all
practicable means. (Imp 2.1)
Goal
CE 2.2
A safe and efficient roadway system.
Policies
CE 2.2.1 Safe Roadways
Provide for safe roadway conditions by adhering to nationally recognized
improvement standards and uniform construction and maintenance practices.
(Imp 16.4, 16.6)
CE 2.2.2 Safe System Approach
Evaluate traffic collision data annually and review best practices for safe
circulation systems and implement appropriate technologies/infrastructure
consistent with the industry recognized Safe System principles. Incorporate
traffic safety improvement projects in the annual Capital Improvement
Program. (Imp 16.2, 16.4)
40
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-20
CE 2.2.3 Up-to-Date Standards
Periodically review and update street standards to current multimodal capacity
and safety practices. (Imp 16.4, 16.6)
CE 2.2.4 Traffic Control
Design traffic control measures to ensure City streets and roads function with
safety and efficiency for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. (Imp 16.7)
CE 2.2.5 Driveway and Access Limitations
Limit driveway and local street access on arterial streets to maintain a desired
quality of traffic flow and limit hazards to active transportation modes.
Wherever possible, consolidate and/or reduce the number of driveways and
implement access controls during redevelopment of adjacent parcels. (Imp 16.1)
CE 2.2.6 Neighborhood Traffic Calming
Balance safety, quality of life, and efficiency when considering cut-through
traffic and traffic calming improvements to local neighborhood streets.
Address neighborhood traffic concerns through City Council Policy L-26. (Imp
16.6)
CE 2.2.7 Emergency Access
Provide all residential, commercial, and industrial areas with efficient and safe
access for emergency vehicles. An emergency evacuation map shall be
prepared as part of an updated Safety Element. (Imp 16.6)
CE 2.2.8 Alleys
Alleys in new developments shall be 20’ wide to facilitate circulation. (Imp 8.1)
Goal
CE 2.3
Optimal roadway system operation.
Policies
CE 2.3.1 Coast Highway Ownership
Pursue ownership of Coast Highway throughout Newport Beach, as
opportunities arise, so that Coast Highway can be improved to its ultimate
width in Mariners’ Mile consistent with the City’s Master Plan of Streets and
Highways and the OCTA Master Plan of Arterial Highways and to provide
41
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-21
the City with more opportunities to increase operational efficiencies. (Imp 2.1,
14.9)
CE 2.3.2 Roadway Maintenance
Support roadway maintenance programs that inspect, repair, and rehabilitate
pavement surfaces and sidewalks in order to preserve the high quality of City
streets and thoroughfares. (Imp 16.4)
CE 2.3.3 New Development Maintenance Responsibility
Ensure minimization of traffic congestion impacts and parking impacts and
ensure proper roadway maintenance through review and approval of
Construction Management Plans associated with new development proposals
in residential neighborhoods. (Imp 8.1, 16.9)
CE 2.3.4 Traffic Conditions Data Base
Monitor traffic conditions and optimize traffic signal operations and
coordination on an ongoing basis. (Imp 16.2)
CE 2.3.5 Improvements to Reflect Changing Traffic Conditions
Based on the monitoring of traffic conditions, consider additional
improvements in areas with operations issues, such as intersections with heavy
turn volumes (e.g., additional turn lanes, traffic signal progression, etc.). (Imp
16.2)
CE 2.3.6 San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor
Work with the Transportation Corridor Agency (TCA) to create improvement
strategies and funding mechanisms to address regional through traffic created
by the toll road along East Coast Highway and within the area of influence of
the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor.
Goal
CE 2.4
Truck routes that support goods movement to and from land use in the City while minimizing adverse
impacts to residents or businesses.
42
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-22
Policies
CE 2.4.1 Truck Routes
Allow truck use of City streets except selected residential and arterial streets
adjacent to residential areas and school zones necessary to minimize impacts
of truck traffic on residential areas. (Imp 16.9)
CE 2.4.2 Impacts of Trucks
Provide appropriately designed and maintained roadways to safely
accommodate truck travel and minimize noise and vibration. (Imp 16.9)
CE 2.4.3 Management of Truck Activities
Actively manage trucking activities related to oversize loads such as large boats
and comparable characteristics. (Imp 16.9)
CE 2.4.4 Construction Management Plans
Develop program to require CMP for large developments to address haul
routes, hours of operation, and number of truck trips. (Imp 16.9)
Regional Transportation
Goal
CE 3.1
A network of regional facilities which ensures the safe and efficient movement of people and goods from
within the City to areas outside its boundaries and minimizes the use of City streets by regional through
traffic.
Policies
CE 3.1.1 Freeway System
Encourage ongoing regional investment in the freeway system. (Imp 14.1, 14.3,
14.9, 14.10)
CE 3.1.2 Integration of Transportation Systems with Adjoining Communities
and the Region
Interface with regional and surrounding local agencies, such as Caltrans,
OCTA, the County of Orange, John Wayne Airport, the Cities of Irvine, Costa
Mesa, and Huntington Beach, and the University of California, Irvine to
implement systems that serve the needs of regional travelers (vehicles,
43
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-23
bicycles, and pedestrians) in a way that minimizes impacts on Newport Beach
residents. (Imp 14.9, 14.10, 16.5)
CE 3.1.3 Traffic from Adjoining Communities
Continue to monitor land development applications in adjacent communities
and encourage coordination on land development projects that affect traffic
and mobility in Newport Beach. (Imp 14.1)
CE 3.1.4 Regional Consistency
Maintain consistency between the City of Newport Beach Master Plan of
Streets and Highways (shown on Figure CE1) and the Orange County Master
Plan of Arterial Highways. (Imp 16.5)
CE 3.1.5 Regional Traffic Mitigation
Continue to participate in programs (Orange County Congestion
Management Program, Southern California Association of Governments
Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy, etc.) to
reduce regional traffic congestion. (Imp 14.1, 14.3, 16.5)
CE 3.1.6 Santa Ana River Future Mobility Alternatives
Advocate for the study and review of regional transportation improvements
along and/or across the Santa Ana River, which reflects current planning, that
may include active transportation or neighborhood electric vehicle
improvements that reduce passenger car use, offer mobility choice, enhance
recreation and community health and reduce vehicle miles traveled without
disproportionate impacts on Newport Beach including Coast Highway,
consistent with all environmental review requirements. (Imp 16.5)
Public Transportation
Goal
CE 4.1
A public transportation system that provides mobility for residents and encourages use of public
transportation as an alternative to automobile travel.
Policies
CE 4.1.1 Public Transit Efficiency
Support efforts by OCTA and other agencies to increase the effectiveness of
transit services, possibly including local shuttle services. (Imp 14.4)
44
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-24
CE 4.1.2 Transit Services for Special Need Populations
Support efforts to increase accessible transit services and facilities for the
elderly, disabled, and other transportation disadvantaged persons. (Imp 16.8)
CE 4.1.3 Seasonal Public Transit
Coordinate with OCTA to provide seasonal, recreational, and special events
shuttles. (Imp 14.4, 16.8)
CE 4.1.4 John Wayne Airport Shuttles
Encourage the use of airport shuttle services to minimize the impacts of air
travelers on the local roadway system. (Imp 14.4, 16.8)
CE 4.1.5 Transit Support Facilities
Cooperate with OCTA in efforts to provide additional regional transit support
facilities, including park-and-ride lots, bus stops, and shelters in higher density
residential areas or mixed-use development areas to reduce passenger car
travel through and within Newport Beach. (Imp 16.8)
CE 4.1.6 School Transit
Monitor the demand for additional private, public, and school transportation
available to serve the needs of K–12 students and advocate for improvements
in traffic from students. (Imp 14.2, 16.11)
Alternative Transportation Modes
Goal
CE 5.1
A transportation system that supports Complete Streets policies and design.
Policies
CE 5.1.1 Circulation Complete Streets System for All Users
Develop a Complete Streets master plan and design guide based upon best
practices (e.g., Orange County Council of Governments Complete Streets
Initiative Design Handbook, 2016) that prioritizes City rights of way to allow
all users safe and efficient mobility. Pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and
transit riders of all ages and abilities are able to safely move along and across
the mobility system of Newport Beach. (Imp 16.1, 16.8, 16.11)
45
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-25
Goal
CE 5.2
Convenient bicycle trail systems that satisfy recreational desires and transportation needs.
Policies
CE 5.2.2 Integration of the Bicycle Master Plan
Review projects adopted in the 2014 Bicycle Master Plan, the 20-year program
of bicycle capital improvements to facilitate safe and efficient active
transportation commute and recreational mobility, annually and integrate
bicycle projects into general mobility capital improvement programming. (Imp
16.11)
CE 5.2.3 Bicycle Master Plan Vision
Provide for a network of active transportation facilities consistent with the
vision in the current Newport Beach Bicycle Master Plan. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.2.4 Trail System
Promote construction of a comprehensive trail system as shown on Figure
CE3 to connect bicycle trails with hiking trails and transit routes. (Updated
figure in process) (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.2.5 Travel Mode Connectivity
Ensure all active transportation networks are linked and provide connectivity
between transit, transit centers, and other major land uses such as village areas,
commercial centers, activity nodes, recreation facilities, schools, parks, and
institutions so that residents can travel within the community without driving.
(Imp 16.8, 16.11, 20.1)
CE 5.2.6 Pedestrian Improvements in New Development Projects
Require new development projects to include safe and attractive sidewalks,
walkways, and bike lanes in accordance with the Master Plan, and, if feasible,
trails. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.2.7 Linkages to Citywide Trail System and Neighborhoods
Require developers to construct links to the planned trail system, adjacent
areas, and communities where appropriate. (Imp 16.11)
46
IS
L
E
PI E R
CO R ON A
N EW PO R T
CRY S T A L CO V EW EST
J
E
T
TY
SH O R E S
L ID O
City
of
Newport
Beach
FASHION
E
A
S
T
JET
T
Y
IS LA N D
NE W P O R T
RI D G E
HA R B O R
BI
G
NE W PO R T
PI E R
IS L A N D
D U N ES
N O R TH
R I V ER J ET T Y
IS LA N D
LID O
C O L L I N S
PE N I N SU LA
City
of
Irvine
S T A T E P A RK
BAL
B
O
A
I
S
L
A
N
D
ISLAND
IS L E
ST
A
R
CO R ON A
WE D G E
BE AC H
L IN D A
TH
E
NE W PO R T
NE W P O R T C O AS T
CA M E O
BA LB O A
BA
Y
SA N T A AN A
LIT T LE
SH O R E S
C R YST AL C O VE ST AT E P AR K
BigC
a
n
y
o
n
Sp
y
g
l
a
s
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
Bu ck G u l ly
NE
W
P
O
R
T
J O A Q U I N
CH
A
N
N
E
L
B A Y
BIG
BA
S
I
N
C
A
N
Y
O
N
SA
N
D
I
E
G
O
C
R
E
E
K
SA N
ISLAND
(Dr y)
BA
L
B
O
A
U P P E R
W
E
S
T
L
I
D
O
C
H
A
N
N
E
L
CH
A
N
N
E
L
HA R B O R
E
NT
R
A
N
C
E
TU R N I N G
C
HAN
N
ELR E S E R V O IR
LID
O
P A C I F I C O C E A N
R E S E R V O I R
N
E
W
P
O
R
T
WESTNEWPORTBLVDSUPERIORAVENUE ANAAVENUEIRVINEAVENUECAMPUSDRIVE
FORD
ROAD
MACARTHURBLVDSA
N
J
O
A
Q
U
I
NROAD
SAN
JOAQUIN
HILLS
TRANSPORTATION
CORRID
O
R
NEWPORT COASTDRIVEHIGHWAYJAMBOREEROAD I R V I N E
C O S T A M E S A SANTAHILLS
Text§¨¦405
ÄÆ55
ÄÆ73
IS
L
E
PI E R
CO R ON A
N EW PO R T
CRY S T A L CO V EW EST
J
E
T
TY
SH O R E S
L ID O
City
of
Newport
Beach
FASHION
E
A
S
T
JET
T
Y
IS LA N D
NE W P O R T
RI D G E
HA R B O R
BI
G
NE W PO R T
PI E R
IS L A N D
D U N ES
N O R TH
R I V ER J ET T Y
IS LA N D
LID O
C O L L I N S
PE N I N SU LA
City
of
Irvine
S T A T E P A RK
BAL
B
O
A
I
S
L
A
N
D
ISLAND
IS L E
ST
A
R
CO R ON A
WE D G E
BE AC H
L IN D A
TH
E
NE W PO R T
NE W P O R T C O AS T
CA M E O
BA LB O A
BA
Y
SA N T A AN A
LIT T LE
SH O R E S
C R YST AL C O VE ST AT E P AR K
BigC
a
n
y
o
n
Sp
y
g
l
a
s
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
Bu ck G u l ly
NE
W
P
O
R
T
J O A Q U I N
CH
A
N
N
E
L
B A Y
BIG
BA
S
I
N
C
A
N
Y
O
N
SA
N
D
I
E
G
O
C
R
E
E
K
SA N
ISLAND
(Dr y)
BA
L
B
O
A
U P P E R
W
E
S
T
L
I
D
O
C
H
A
N
N
E
L
CH
A
N
N
E
L
HA R B O R
E
NT
R
A
N
C
E
TU R N I N G
C
HAN
N
ELR E S E R V O IR
LID
O
P A C I F I C O C E A N
R E S E R V O I R
N
E
W
P
O
R
T
WESTNEWPORTBLVDSUPERIORAVENUE ANAAVENUEIRVINEAVENUECAMPUSDRIVE
FORD
ROAD
MACARTHURBLVDSA
N
J
O
A
Q
U
I
NROAD
SAN
JOAQUIN
HILLS
TRANSPORTATION
CORRID
O
R
NEWPORT COASTDRIVEHIGHWAYJAMBOREEROAD I R V I N E
C O S T A M E S A SANTAHILLS
Text§¨¦405
ÄÆ55
ÄÆ73
CITY of NEWPORT BEACHGENERAL PLAN
Source: City of Newport BeachBicycle Master Plan, October 2014Date: 7/28/22
7N
Figure CE3BIKEWAYSMASTER PLAN
0 0.5 1
Miles
Legend
Recommended Facilities
Off-Street Bike Path (Class I)
Sidewalks--Bicycle Riding Allowed
On-Street Bike Lane (Class II)
Designated Bike Route (Class III)
Existing Facilities
Off-Street Bike Path (Class I)
Sidewalks--Bicycle Riding Allowed
On-Street Bike Lane (Class II)
Designated Bike Route (Class III)
47
INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE48
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-27
CE 5.2.8 Bikeway System
Cooperate with state, federal, county, and local agencies to coordinate
bikeways and trails throughout the region. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.2.9 Bikeway Legislation
Coordinate with local legislative delegation in Sacramento to address safety
regulation of bicycles and e-bikes, including training, education and
modification to the California Vehicle Code.
CE 5.2.10 Bicycle Supporting Facilities
Incorporate separate bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the design plans for
new streets and highways and, where feasible, in the plans for improving
existing roads. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.2.11 Bicycle Supporting Amenities
Require bicycle facilities such as bike racks, bike stations, or lockers according
to national standards for long-term and short-term bicycle utilization on City
property and with new development and encourage the addition of such
bicycle facilities within existing development. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.2.12 Bicycle Safety
Provide for safety of conventional bicyclists, e-bicyclists, equestrians, and
pedestrians by adhering to current national standards and uniform practices
especially where modes interact. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.2.13 Bicycle Conflicts with Vehicles and
Pedestrians
Minimize conflict points among motorized
traffic, pedestrians, e-bikes, and conven-
tional bicycle traffic. Support increased
enforcement activity for bicycle and e-bike
travel, with a focus on The Oceanfront
Boardwalk and around school zones. (Imp
16.11)
CE 5.2.14 Integrated Bicycle Improvements
Coordinate community bicycle and pedestrian facilities in a citywide network
for continuity of travel. (Imp 16.11)
49
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-28
CE 5.2.15 Bicycle Trail Signage
Develop and implement a uniform signing program to assist the public in
locating, recognizing, and utilizing public bikeways and trails. (Imp 16.11)
Goal
CE 5.3
Safe and complete active transportation alternatives near school zones.
Policies
CE 5.3.1 School Access
Work with schools to promote walking, biking, safe drop-off, and other
improvements. (Imp 14.2, 16.11)
CE 5.3.2 School Coordination
Explore opportunities to create working group of decision makers at the City
and the school district to meet regularly to address safe school mobility, access
and parking.
Goal
CE 5.4
Completion of pedestrian infrastructure where planned and necessary.
Policies
CE 5.4.1 Pedestrian Street Crossings
Continue to implement improved pedestrian
crossings, such as lighted crosswalk installations, in
key high-volume areas such as Corona Del Mar,
Mariners’ Mile, West Newport, Airport Area,
Newport Center/Fashion Island, and the Balboa
Peninsula. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.4.2 Overhead Pedestrian Street Crossings
Consider overhead pedestrian crossings in areas where pedestrian use limits
the efficiency of the roadway or signalized intersection and/or where an
overhead crossing provides for improved pedestrian safety. (Imp 16.11)
50
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-29
CE 5.4.3 Newport Harbor Trails and Walkways
Develop and implement a long-range plan for public trails and walkways to
access all appropriate commercial areas of the harbor, as determined to be
physically and economically feasible including the following:
A. Extension of the Lido Marina Village boardwalk across all of the
waterfront commercial properties in Lido Village
B. Provide a continuous waterfront walkway along the Rhine Channel,
connecting Cannery Village and McFadden Square waterfront
commercial areas with Las Arenas Beach at 19th Street
C. Provide a walkway connecting the Lido Village area with Mariners’ Mile
D. Provide a continuous walkway along the Mariners’ Mile waterfront from
the Coast Highway/Newport Boulevard Bridge to the Balboa Bay Club
(Policy HB 6.2) (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.4.4 Pedestrian Sidewalk Improvements
As part of the annual capital improvement planning, consider implementation
and construction of new sidewalks and improvements to sidewalks to result
in comfortable widths consistent with industry standards and appropriate for
the street/neighborhood. Provide for safe and ample opportunities to cross
streets and design safe crosswalk enhancements.
CE 5.4.5 Equestrian Trails
Maintain the existing equestrian trail system in Santa Ana Heights (Figure
CE4). (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.4.6 Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety
Provide for the safety of bicyclists and pedestrians
through provision of adequate facilities, including
review of locations where sidewalk use by bicyclists is
appropriate, consideration of separate facilities for e-
bikes or other semi-motorized modes, and maintenance
and construction of extra sidewalk width where feasible.
(Imp 16.11)
Goal
CE 5.5
Enhanced and maintained public water transportation services and expanded public water transportation
uses and land support facilities. (Policy HB 6.5)
51
INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE52
")")
IS
L
E
PI E R
CO R ON A
N EW PO R T
CRY S T A L CO V EW EST
J
E
T
TY
SH O R E S
L ID O
City
of
Newport
Beach
FASHION
E
A
S
T
JET
T
Y
IS LA N D
NE W P O R T
RI D G E
HA R B O R
BI
G
NE W PO R T
PI E R
IS L A N D
D U N ES
N O R TH
R I V ER J ET T Y
IS LA N D
LID O
C O L L I N S
PE N I N SU LA
City
of
Irvine
S T A T E P A RK
BAL
B
O
A
I
S
L
A
N
D
ISLAND
IS L E
ST
A
R
CO R ON A
WE D G E
BE AC H
L IN D A
TH
E
NE W PO R T
NE W P O R T C O AS T
CA M E O
BA LB O A
BA
Y
SA N T A AN A
LIT T LE
SH O R E S
C R YST AL C O VE ST AT E P AR K
BigC
a
n
y
o
n
Sp
y
g
l
a
s
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
Bu ck G u l ly
NE
W
P
O
R
T
J O A Q U I N
CH
A
N
N
E
L
B A Y
BIG
BA
S
I
N
C
A
N
Y
O
N
SA
N
D
I
E
G
O
C
R
E
E
K
SA N
ISLAND
(Dr y)
BA
L
B
O
A
U P P E R
W
E
S
T
L
I
D
O
C
H
A
N
N
E
L
CH
A
N
N
E
L
HA R B O R
E
NT
R
A
N
C
E
TU R N I N G
C
HAN
N
ELR E S E R V O IR
LID
O
P A C I F I C O C E A N
R E S E R V O I R
N
E
W
P
O
R
T
WESTNEWPORTBLVDSUPERIORAVENUE ANAAVENUEIRVINEAVENUECAMPUSDRIVE
FORD
ROAD
MACARTHURBLVDSA
N
J
O
A
Q
U
I
NROAD
SAN
JOAQUIN
HILLS
TRANSPORTATION
CORRID
O
R
NEWPORT COASTDRIVEHIGHWAYJAMBOREEROAD I R V I N E
C O S T A M E S A SANTAHILLS
Text§¨¦405
ÄÆ55
ÄÆ73
")")
IS
L
E
PI E R
CO R ON A
N EW PO R T
CRY S T A L CO V EW EST
J
E
T
TY
SH O R E S
L ID O
City
of
Newport
Beach
FASHION
E
A
S
T
JET
T
Y
IS LA N D
NE W P O R T
RI D G E
HA R B O R
BI
G
NE W PO R T
PI E R
IS L A N D
D U N ES
N O R TH
R I V ER J ET T Y
IS LA N D
LID O
C O L L I N S
PE N I N SU LA
City
of
Irvine
S T A T E P A RK
BAL
B
O
A
I
S
L
A
N
D
ISLAND
IS L E
ST
A
R
CO R ON A
WE D G E
BE AC H
L IN D A
TH
E
NE W PO R T
NE W P O R T C O AS T
CA M E O
BA LB O A
BA
Y
SA N T A AN A
LIT T LE
SH O R E S
C R YST AL C O VE ST AT E P AR K
BigC
a
n
y
o
n
Sp
y
g
l
a
s
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
Bu ck G u l ly
NE
W
P
O
R
T
J O A Q U I N
CH
A
N
N
E
L
B A Y
BIG
BA
S
I
N
C
A
N
Y
O
N
SA
N
D
I
E
G
O
C
R
E
E
K
SA N
ISLAND
(Dr y)
BA
L
B
O
A
U P P E R
W
E
S
T
L
I
D
O
C
H
A
N
N
E
L
CH
A
N
N
E
L
HA R B O R
E
NT
R
A
N
C
E
TU R N I N G
C
HAN
N
ELR E S E R V O IR
LID
O
P A C I F I C O C E A N
R E S E R V O I R
N
E
W
P
O
R
T
WESTNEWPORTBLVDSUPERIORAVENUE ANAAVENUEIRVINEAVENUECAMPUSDRIVE
FORD
ROAD
MACARTHURBLVDSA
N
J
O
A
Q
U
I
NROAD
SAN
JOAQUIN
HILLS
TRANSPORTATION
CORRID
O
R
NEWPORT COASTDRIVEHIGHWAYJAMBOREEROAD I R V I N E
C O S T A M E S A SANTAHILLS
Text§¨¦405
ÄÆ55
ÄÆ73
CITY of NEWPORT BEACHGENERAL PLAN
Source: City of Newport Beach
Date: 7/28/22
7N
Figure CE4EQUESTRIAN AND HIKINGTRAILS MASTER PLAN
0 0.5 1
Miles
Legend
")Existing Staging Area
")Proposed Staging Area
Proposed Equestrian TrailExisting Equestrian Trail
Existing Hiking Trail
53
INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE54
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-31
Policies
CE 5.5.1 Marine Terminals
Coordinate the location of marine terminals with other components of the
transportation system to ensure convenient multi-modal access and adequate
parking. (Policy HB 6.6) (Imp 16.12)
CE 5.5.2 Expanded Water Transportation Modes
Promote opportunities to expand water transportation modes, such as water-
based shuttle services and other nautical services. (Policy HB 6.7) (Imp 16.12)
Emerging Technology
Goal
CE 6.1
An efficient circulation system through the use of transportation systems management.
Policies
CE 6.1.1 Traffic Signals
Improve traffic signal operations by optimizing signal timing, interconnecting
signalized intersections along arterial streets, and installing computerized
master traffic signal control systems in intensively utilized areas. (Imp 16.7)
CE 6.1.2 Intelligent Transportation Systems
Explore and implement intelligent transportation system and infrastructure
improvements which will improve circulation system performance from that
forecast in this Element. (Imp16.4, 16.7
CE 6.1.3 Coordination with Adjacent Jurisdictions
Coordinate operations with adjacent jurisdictions to enhance the efficiency of
inter-jurisdictional roadway system operations. (Imp 14.1, 14.3)
CE 6.1.4 Rideshare Vehicles
Monitor the volume and proliferation of on demand rideshare services (e.g.,
Uber and Lyft) and respond with appropriate level of design guidance and
regulation of curb side uses (including loading zone) and parking lot
utilization. (Imp 16.10)
55
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-32
CE 6.1.5 Autonomous, Connected, and Future Vehicle Technology
Monitor the development of new vehicle technology and associated
community-based infrastructure. For improvements demonstrated as
practical, plan for the deployment of new vehicle technology within the
existing right-of-way and infrastructure system through the annual budgeting
process and capital improvement programming process. (Imp 16.7, 30.1)
CE 6.1.6 Wayfinding Technology
Monitor and communicate with wayfinding technology providers (e.g., Waze
and Google Maps) to reduce routing of traffic through neighborhoods. (Imp
16.7)
CE 6.1.7 Parking Technology
Consider deployment of parking app technology that identifies available
parking spaces and reduces vehicle circulation and congestion related to
searching for parking spaces. (Imp 16.7)
Climate Change
Goal
CE 7.1
Promote strategies to reduce the use of internal combustion passenger cars and the attendant greenhouse
gas emissions.
Policies
CE 7.1.1 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis
Follow the analysis methodology for vehicle miles traveled according to the
Newport Beach VMT thresholds policy and as required in Senate Bill 743 and
the revised California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. (Imp
11.1)
CE 7.1.2 VMT Mitigation Measures
Require implementation of CEQA project related VMT mitigation measures
when warranted and monitor reductions in VMT from new development. (Imp
11.1)
56
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-33
CE 7.1.3 Regional VMT Mitigation Measures
Promote the development of regional VMT mitigation in order to simplify the
CEQA process and enhance the effectiveness of VMT and GHG reduction
strategies. (Imp 14.4)
CE 7.1.4 Alternative Transportation Modes and Practices
Promote and encourage the use of alternative transportation modes, such as
ridesharing, carpools, vanpools, public transit, bicycles, walking, and
telecommuting programs, through the planning and development of a
Complete Streets master plan and design guide. (Imp 16.8, 16.11)
CE 7.1.5 Support Facilities for Alternative Modes
Require new development projects to provide facilities commensurate with
development type and intensity to support alternative modes, such as
preferential parking for carpools, bike racks, bike stations, bicycle lockers,
showers, commuter information areas, rideshare vehicle loading areas, water
transportation docks, and bus stop improvements. (Imp 16.8, 16.11)
CE 7.1.6 Public Right of Way Curbside Management
Review areas with commercial uses (such as retail, restaurant, and hospitality)
to incorporate strategies to accommodate novel use of curb side right of way
to reduce passenger car use through drop-off or valet and accommodate
rideshare as well as delivery activities where appropriate. (Imp 16.10)
CE 7.1.7 Project Site Design Supporting Alternative Modes
Encourage increased use of public transportation by requiring project site
designs that facilitate the use of public transportation and walking. (Imp 16.8,
16.11)
CE 7.1.8 Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Stations
Install additional EV charging stations on City properties, support existing
private development to add new EV charging stations and develop incentives
for the installation of EV charging stations and other alternative fuels systems
as part of new development.
57
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-34
Parking
Goal
CE 8.1
An adequate supply of convenient parking throughout the City.
Policies
CE 8.1.1 Required Parking
Require that new development provide adequate, convenient parking for
residents, guests, business patrons, and visitors. (Imp 16.10)
CE 8.1.2 Parking Considerations of Rideshare Vehicles
Develop parking demand statistics that consider the efficiency of rideshare
services and the potential for reduction in parking requirements. (Imp 16.10)
CE 8.1.3 Parking In-Lieu Fees
Establish an in-lieu parking fee that the City may require to be paid when a
development is not able to provide required parking. (Imp 16.10)
CE 8.1.4 Funding of Shared Parking Facilities
Use in-lieu fees and other funds to develop public shared parking facilities in
areas with inadequate parking supply. Priority shall be given to spending fees
in areas that will benefit those who contributed the fees. (Imp 16.10)
CE 8.1.5 Expanded Parking in Corona del Mar
Permit conversion of Corona Del Mar residential lots adjacent to commercial
areas and commercial lots for parking to support commercial uses. Encourage
continued use of existing parking on residential zoned lots, as well as existing
shared parking lots. (Imp 2.1, 8.1, 8.2, 24.1)
CE 8.1.6 Parking Consolidation
Evaluate the potential to consolidate underutilized parcels to create parking
districts and to construct areawide parking hubs potentially relieving individual
parcels of some of their parking requirements. (Imp 16.10)
CE 8.1.7 Avon Street Municipal Parking Lot Relocation
Consider relocation of the Avon Street municipal lot to better serve
commercial uses in Mariners’ Mile. (Imp 2.1, 16.10)
58
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-35
CE 8.1.8 Public Use of Private Parking Facilities
Encourage the use of commercial, office, and institutional parking areas for
use as public parking to serve coastal recreational areas during weekends and
holidays, in conjunction with public transit or shuttles where appropriate. (Imp
8.1, 8.2, 16.10)
CE 8.1.9 Shared Parking Facilities
Consider allowing shared parking in mixed use and pedestrian oriented areas
throughout the City. (Imp 2.1, 8.1, 8.2, 16.10)
CE 8.1.10 Parking Configuration
Site and design new development to avoid use of parking configurations or
management programs that are difficult to maintain and enforce. (Imp 2.1, 7.1,
8.1)
CE 8.1.11 Parking Requirements for Pedestrian-Oriented and Local-Serving
Uses
Consider revised parking requirements for small scale neighborhood serving
commercial uses in areas that derive most of their trade from walk-in business,
especially where on-street or other public parking is available. (Imp 2.1, 8.1, 8.2)
CE 8.1.12 Parking for Marine Recreational Users
Provide adequate parking as necessary in the vicinity of visitor serving marine
uses, including marinas, water transportation terminals, boat ramps, as well as
parking suitable for service vehicles in commercial marinas and berthing areas.
(Imp 16.12)
CE 8.1.13 Curb Cuts
Require new development to minimize curb cuts to protect on-street parking
spaces. Close curb cuts to create on street parking spaces wherever feasible.
(Imp 2.1, 7.1, 8.1)
CE 8.1.14 Alley Access
Require alley access to parking areas for all new development in areas where
alley access exists. (Imp 2.1, 8.1)
CE 8.1.15 Up-to-Date Parking Requirements
Periodically review and update off-street parking requirements in the
Municipal Code to account for changes in technology and commuter behavior
and ensure that new development provides off-street parking sufficient to
serve approved uses. (Imp 8.1, 8.2, 16.10)
59
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-36
Goal
CE 8.2
An efficiently operated parking system.
Policies
CE 8.2.1 Parking Management
Develop parking management programs for areas with inadequate parking.
(Imp 16.10)
CE 8.2.2 Parking Technology
Support the development of new technologies, including parking related apps
to promote wayfinding, parking availability, and parking fee collections in an
efficient manner. (Imp 16.10)
CE 8.2.3 Parking Pricing
Periodically review and update parking fees and rates at on-street locations
and off-street parking lots operated by the City. (Imp 16.10)
CE 8.2.4 Parking Signage
Provide improved parking information and signage. (Imp 16.10)
CE 8.2.5 Shared Valet Service
Explore the feasibility of shared valet parking programs in areas with high
parking demand and less conveniently located parking facilities, such as
Mariners’ Mile and McFadden Square. (Imp 16.10)
Transportation Funding
Goal
CE 9.1
Adequate funding for needed transportation infrastructure and operations including support of measures
for outside funding of transportation improvements.
60
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-37
Policies
CE 9.1.1 Transportation User and Benefit Fees
Support legislation to increase transportation user and benefit fees, and to
index such fees to keep pace with inflation, in order to provide the additional
revenues for needed transportation facilities and services. (Imp 7.3)
CE 9.1.2 State Highway Revenues
Support legislation to increase state highway revenues as needed to maintain
and rehabilitate the existing state highway system and to match all available
federal highway funding. (Imp 14.9)
CE 9.1.3 Innovative Transportation Funding
Support the evaluation and implementation of innovative transportation
financing mechanisms such as local tax increment districts, benefit assessment
districts, and joint development and use of transportation centers. (Imp 31.1)
CE 9.1.4 Local Street and Highway Revenues
Support measures to increase local street and highway revenues as needed to
fund all road reconstruction, operation, and maintenance cost. (Imp 7.3, 20.1)
CE 9.1.5 Comprehensive Funding Program
Support measures to develop and implement a continuing funding program,
including private sector participation, to fund the construction, operation, and
maintenance of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities and services. (Imp 7.2,
7.3, 20.1)
CE 9.1.6 Annual Budgeting for Improvements
Annually review and consider budgeting for projects contributing to
completion of the Master Plan of Streets and Highways, Bicycle Master Plan,
Complete Streets Master Plan, and intelligent transportation system plans. (Imp
7.3, 30.1)
CE 9.1.7 Fair Share Fee Ordinance
Periodically review the Fair Share Fee Ordinance, reassess the unfunded cost
of required improvements, and adjust the required Fair Share Fees as
appropriate. (Imp 7.2)
CE 9.1.8 Roadway Improvements Funding
Fund costs of major roadway facility and intersection improvements through
gas tax revenues, federal, state, and county grants, and City ordinances to avoid
61
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Newport Beach General Plan 7-38
burdening the General Fund to the extent that this is possible. (Imp 7.2, 7.3,
30.2)
CE 9.1.9 Right-of-Way Dedication
Require the dedication of needed right-of-way in conjunction with approval
of subdivision maps or other discretionary approvals. (Imp 1.1)
CE 9.1.10 Development Requirements
Require development to provide the needed roadway improvements adjacent
to a site, commensurate with project impact and in accordance with the Master
Plan of Streets and Highways. (Imp 16.3)
CE 9.1.11 Joint Funding with Adjoining Jurisdictions
Pursue joint funding of improvements in areas (such as the Airport Area)
where traffic growth and/or needed improvements are demonstrably based
upon traffic contributions or improvements that are a joint responsibility of
Newport Beach and one or more adjacent jurisdictions/agencies. (Imp 14.1)
CE 9.1.12 Measure M Restrictions
Measure M sales tax revenues shall not be used to replace private developer
funding that has been committed for any project or normal subdivision
obligations. (Imp 16.2)
CE 9.1.13 Transportation Improvement or Special Assessment District
Establish a transportation improvement or special assessment district to fund
improvements needed in the Airport Area. (Imp 31.1)
62
Attachment No. PC 2
Redline Version of Circulation Element
Update
63
INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE64
Ci rculat i o n Eleme n t
7-3 Newport Beach G e n e r a l Pl an
CIRCULATION ELEMENT
A Safe and Convenient Transportation System for All
Introduction
The abilityCounty of Orange continues to move peoplegrow as a thriving urban residential and goods
throughoutemployment region. Over the years, Newport Beach has transformed along with the County. Once a
small community and beyondseasonal getaway, Newport Beach is importantnow home to 86,000 residents and
businesses. Local roadways are the most important elementis a global destination for mobility travel. As a result,
travel in Newport Beach, but transit, shuttles, the trail system, and the harbor provide opportunitiessurrounding
communities has evolved. Demographics and technology are changing the demand for alternativeand delivery of
different travel modes of travel that could relieve pressure on roadways.. The legacy of the pandemic may also
further change travel demand and travel habits. The trend from regional and State levels of governments has been
to provide greater regulation regarding the planning and programming of transportation. The Circulation Element
of the Newport Beach General Plan governs the long-term development of mobility system ofsystems in the City
of Newport Beach. and provides the best opportunity for the City to establish its vision of mobility. The Circulation
Element acknowledges the influences of local, regional, State and federal guidance and regulation, and expresses
the ultimate vision of mobility to respond to the needs and objectives of Newport Beach residents. The goals and
policies in thisthe Circulation Element are closely correlatedbalanced with the goals and policies of the Land Use
Element and are intendedHousing Elements in order to provide a correlation between land use and transportation
planning. In so doing the General Plan provides the best possible balance between the City’s future growth and
land use development, roadway size, traffic, service levels for all travel modes, and community character. The
Circulation Element is also consistent with the Complete Streets Act (Assembly Bill 1358), the Sustainable
Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (Senate Bill 375), the Vehicle Miles Traveled provisions of Senate
Bill 743, the Transportation Demand Management Ordinance, and the Local Coastal Program.
65
Ci rculat i o n Eleme n t
7-4 Newport Bea c h Gener a l Pla n
Context
SETTING
Since Newport Beach fronts on the Pacific Ocean, the City has access from only three directions. Upper
Newport Bay acts as a barrier, resulting in only two east/west routes through Newport Beach (Coast
Highway and the Bristol Street/SR 73 corridor) and high traffic volumes on these two routes, which
results in congestion. John Wayne Airport (JWA) also acts as a barrier to circulation on the City’s
northern border, and adds traffic on Airport Area streets.
At the same time, Newport Harbor creates a unique opportunity for transportation solutions. Examples
of existing water transportation services in Newport Beach include the Santa Catalina Ferry (providing
access from the Balboa Pavilion to Santa Catalina Island), and the Balboa Ferry (connecting Balboa
Island to the Balboa Peninsula). In conjunction with policies in the Harbor and Bay Element
encouraging the development of more public docks in Newport Harbor, more water transportation
services (such as shuttles and taxis) could be established, as well as increased use of private vessels for
transportation around the Bay.
Newport Beach’s location along the coast, development in neighboring cities and regional imbalances
in housing and employment opportunities contribute to the use of Newport Beach’s arterial roadways
by through traffic (traffic that does not have at least one end of the trip within the City of Newport
Beach). During the morning and evening peak hours when traffic is heaviest, a substantial percentage
of vehicles traveling on Coast Highway, MacArthur Boulevard and Newport Coast Drive are making
ELEMENT
That Is Friendly to Pedestrians and Bicycles
through trips. County-wide, trip generation is expected to increase by approximately 18 percent from
2000 to 2025. Studies done in conjunction with this Circulation Element show that more than half of
future traffic growth and future unsatisfactory intersection performance in Newport Beach will result
from growth in the surrounding region, regardless of any future growth and development in Newport
Beach. The location of JWA along Newport Beach’s boundary also contributes to regional traffic
through the City. JWA users access the freeway system as well as nearby destinations through the
Newport Beach roadway system. The additional JWA activity generated by the recently approved
increases in passenger service levels and passenger loading bridges will increase traffic volume on
66
Ci rculat i o n Eleme n t
7-5 Newport Beach G e n e r a l Pl an
Airport Area roads such as MacArthur Boulevard, Campus Drive, Jamboree Road, and the Bristol Street
couplet.
Summertime beach traffic has been a challenge for Newport Beach since the 1920’s. During June, July
and August, weekend traffic near the beach and harbor is substantially higher than typical spring/fall
(“shoulder season”) or winter conditions. Volumes on impacted roadways generally increase by almost
30 percent, but summertime beach traffic occurs at different times than the typical weekday business or
school related traffic during most of the year. The two locations with weekend volume increases of
more than 30 percent during the summer are Newport Boulevard south of Coast Highway (75 percent)
and Balboa Boulevard east of 20th Street (75 percent) on the Peninsula.
This Circulation Element continues longstanding Newport Beach policies of using the shoulder season
for transportation planning, sizing the circulation system to meet the needs of City residents and
businesses, and maintaining the character of the community. While these policies may prevent the City
from achieving a desired level of service at all locations at all hours, they also protect Newport Beach
from building oversized roads to serve weekend summer beach traffic or traffic generated outside
of our borders and our control. Instead, policies in this Element encourage improvements to the
regional system that will provide more capacity outside Newport Beach and reduce the number of
through travelers that drive on our local streets.
Newport Beach is centrally located among the six coastal cities in Orange County. The City of Newport Beach was
incorporated in 1906, only ten years after Henry Ford built his first automobile. The community has changed along
with transportation options from days of the Pacific Electric Red Car to wide adoption and then reliance on
automobiles. Even as freeways came to symbolize Southern California, no freeways traversed Newport Beach until
the Corona Del Mar Freeway opened in 1978 providing a short connection between MacArthur Boulevard and the
San Diego Freeway (I-405). Today, the Costa Mesa freeway (SR-55) terminates just north of Newport Beach and
the San Joaquin Transportation Corridor (SR-73) traverses the city’s northern edge. Newport Beach instead relies
on regional roadways for connections and transportation including Coast Highway, Newport Boulevard, Jamboree
Road, and MacArthur Boulevard). In the future, emerging technology and greater access for alternative
transportation modes are anticipated to affect and be affected by Newport Beach as it grows.
Newport Beach is a collection of villages and neighborhoods including Balboa Peninsula, Cannery Village, the
Islands of Newport Harbor, Mariners’ Mile, Newport Heights, Dover Shores, Corona Del Mar, Newport Coast,
Newport Center/Fashion Island, Big Canyon, Back Bay, and Eastbluff. These neighborhoods rely on local streets
for transportation and are connected by regional roadways. Regional traffic also uses the regional roadways, which
has reduced the City’s ability to allocate space to alternative travel modes. Summertime beach traffic has been a
predictable source of traffic volumes near or exceeding roadway capacity in the beach areas for a century.
Growth in Orange County, and especially communities neighboring Newport Beach will increase regional through
traffic and summertime beach traffic. These increases will occur whether or not Newport Beach plans for it. This
Circulation Element plans for anticipated regional growth and seeks regional cooperation to accommodate regional
traffic growth.
67
Ci rculat i o n Eleme n t
7-6 Newport Bea c h Gener a l Pla n
Roads have been the primary means of getting around Newport Beach, but Newport Harbor presents an
opportunity for community specific transportation and recreation alternatives. Water transportation between
Newport Beach and Santa Catalina Island, harbors and ports up and down Southern California, and between Balboa
Island and the Balboa Peninsula is already present. More water transportation services (public or private) could be
established between locations in Newport Beach to reduce the reliance on roadways.
LOCAL ROADWAY SYSTEM
The roadway system serves primarily vehicular traffic in Newport Beach. The roadway system is of
particular interest to the citizens of Newport Beach, as the majority of them use it for primary travel
needs.
Local roadways are planned to accommodate traffic circulating the local village or neighborhood they serve. Keeping
regional traffic off of local streets preserves right-of-way for its intended use and for use by other transportation
modes. In recognition of the need to discourage non-local cut-through traffic from using residential streets, the City
Council adopted Policy L-26 (Traffic Management Policy) in 2006 (amended in 2015 and 2018). This policy provides
tools and a process for managing the speed and volume of vehicles on residential streets and implementing
considered responses that do not simply shift cut-through traffic from one residential street to another.
ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
The roadway system is generally organized in terms of a roadway classification system. The roadMuch of the traffic
traversing Newport Beach uses regional roadways, simply passing through town. Regional serving roadways are
categorized according to the type and quantity of traffic they are designed to accommodate through the roadway
classification system adopted in the City of Newport Beach Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). The
roadway classifications used by the City of Newport Beach are required to be consistent with the County of Orange
Master Plan of Arterial Highways, (MPAH), which is administered by the Orange County Transportation Authority
(OCTA). OCTA is the regional agency responsible for overseeing the regional transportation system and local
agency compliance with regional and statewide programs such as the Congestion Management Program (CMP) and
Growth Management Program (GMP). The general). The roadway classifications and their generalized daily
capacitiescapacity, used for long range General Plan analysis, are presented below. Roadways may be able to carry
traffic above the typical capacity level identified in these basic classifications if the standard section is augmented.
Augmented sections could include additional through lanes, additional turning lanes at intersections with high
turning volumes, or through signal synchronization.
The actual daily capacity of a roadway can vary
widely. Although it is primarily based on the
number of through lanes, it is also influenced by
traffic peaking characteristics, intersection
spacing, traffic turning volumes, and the volume
of vehicular and pedestrian cross traffic. The
68
Ci rculat i o n Eleme n t
7-7 Newport Beach G e n e r a l Pl an
typical daily capacities are therefore most appropriately used for long range General Plan analysis, or as
a screening tool to determine the need for more detailed peak hour analysis. More detailed peak hour
analysis at all potentially impacted intersections will be required as part of the City’s review of
development projects that have the potential to result in traffic impacts.
Principal Arterial—A Principal arterial highway is typically an eight-lane divided roadway. A Principal arterial is
designed to accommodate a daily capacity ranging from 60,000 to 73,000 with a typical daily capacity of 68,000
vehicles per day (VPD).45,000 to 60,000. Principal arterials carry a large volume of regional through traffic not
handled by the freeway system.
Major Arterial— A Major arterial highway is typically a six-lane divided roadway. A Major arterial is designed to
accommodate a daily capacity ranging from 45,000 to 67,000 with a typical daily capacity of 51,000 vehicles per
day.30,000 to 45,000. Major arterials carry a large volume of regional through traffic not handled by the freeway
system. A Major Augmented is similar to a Major arterial, but may include additional lanes, particularly at
intersections, resulting in a daily capacity ranging from 52,000 to 70,000 with a typical daily capacity of 58,000
vehicles per day..
Primary Arterial— A Primary arterial highway is usually a four-lane divided roadway. A Primary arterial is designed
to accommodate a daily capacity ranging from 30,000 to 45,000 with a typical daily capacity of 34,000 VPD.20,000
to 30,000. A Primary arterial’s function is similar to that of a Principal or Major arterial. The chief difference is
capacity. A Primary Augmented is similar to a Primary arterial, but may include additional lanes, particularly at
intersections, resulting in a daily capacity ranging from 35,000 to 50,000 with a typical daily capacity of 40,000
vehicles per day..
Secondary Arterial— A Secondary arterial highway is a four-lane roadway (often undivided). A Secondary arterial
distributes traffic between local streets and Major or Primary arterials. Although some Secondary arterials serve as
through routes, most provide more direct access to surrounding land uses than Principal, Major, or Primary arterials.
Secondary arterials carry a daily capacity ranging from 20,000 to 30,000 with a typical daily capacity of 23,000
VPD.10,000 to 20,000.
Commuter Roadway—A commuter roadway is a two-to-four-lane, unrestricted access roadway with a daily capacity ranging
from 7,000500 to 11,000 with a typical daily capacity of 10,000 VPD15,000. It differs from a local street in its ability to handle
through traffic movements between arterials.
In addition to these basic classifications, this Circulation Element provides for roadways that can carry
traffic above the typical capacity level for the classification, if the standard section is augmented.
Examples of augmented sections include additional through and/or turning lanes at some locations and
additional turning lanes at signalized street intersections with heavy turning movements. This may be
accomplished by adding right-of-way or by reducing the widths of sidewalk areas, medians, travel lanes,
and emergency shoulder lanes.
ROADWAY OPERATIONS
69
Ci rculat i o n Eleme n t
7-8 Newport Bea c h Gener a l Pla n
The best way to determine the level of traffic service is to analyze performance at major intersections,
and this Element is based on a comprehensive traffic study, a summary of which is presented in the
Appendix. The traffic study includes key information regarding citywide trip generation, daily traffic
volumes, detailed peak hour analysis of all key arterial intersections throughout the City, and roadway
improvement requirements. The forecast traffic volumes are based upon development at the maximum
level allowed by the Land Use Element in Newport Beach and development in adjacent areas over the
next 25 years. Therefore, they present a “worst case” result. As a practical matter, actual development
in any community is typically less than the entitlement or theoretical limit, and Newport Beach’s
experience has been no different. Because of the impact of regional traffic on Newport Beach, a
supplemental traffic study was completed to help determine the impact of traffic growth in the region
on local streets, and a summary of this study is in the Appendix. Intersections that do not perform well
are the major constraint to the efficient operation of the circulation system, and the traffic study
focuses on the level of service at primary intersections in Newport Beach. Generalized definitions of
level of service are as follows:
The efficient operation of the circulation system is constrained by conflict and congestion at intersections.
Intersections that do not perform well can affect roadway conditions upstream and downstream, impact access to
adjacent parcels, increase vehicle collisions, present safety hazards to other travel modes, and concentrate air
pollution. Conflict and congestion are usually the result of traffic volume. The residents of Newport Beach desire
good traffic flow and the ability to get from one side of the city to the other. However, there are impediments to
this.
In Newport Beach, natural barriers (including the Pacific Ocean, the Santa Ana River, and Upper Newport Bay)
and the John Wayne Airport superblock limit roadway connections. As a result, traffic volumes are concentrated
on the roadways making regional connections (i.e., Coast Highway, Bristol Street/SR-73, Newport Boulevard,
Jamboree Road, and MacArthur Boulevard) which increases conflict and congestion at intersections along these
routes. Because other coastal communities have similar barriers, regional traffic with no origin or destination in
Newport Beach also uses these limited connections through Newport Beach, further increasing traffic. Summertime
beach traffic is not affected by Newport Beach land use policy. For that reason, it has been and continues to be the
practice of the City to analyze traffic conditions outside of the summer season to determine the function and
operation of City streets.
The Highway Capacity Manual provides methodology for measuring intersection performance in terms of delay
experienced by vehicles traversing the intersection. As detailed below, letter grades are assigned based on the amount
of delay experienced by vehicles during the peak commute hours. Unlike school grades, however, level of service A
is not necessarily a goal. An intersection performing at level of service A could indicate that too much right-of-way
is dedicated to vehicle travel lanes and not enough right-of-way is dedicated to other travel modes such as bicycles
and pedestrians.
LOS “A”—Minimal delay (less than 10 seconds on average) is experienced.
LOS “B”—Vehicles at signalized intersections experience between 10 and 20 seconds of delay on average,
while vehicles on the side street STOP controlled approaches at unsignalized intersections experience
between 10 and 15 seconds of average delay.
LOS “C”—Delays at signalized intersections range from 20 to 35 seconds and from 15 to 25 seconds for
side street / STOP controlled traffic at unsignalized intersections.
70
Ci rculat i o n Eleme n t
7-9 Newport Beach G e n e r a l Pl an
LOS “D”—Delays at signalized intersections range from 35 to 55 seconds and from 25 to 35 seconds for
side street / STOP controlled approaches at unsignalized intersections.
LOS “E”—Delays at signalized intersections range from 55 to 80 seconds on average, while delays for side
street / STOP controlled traffic at unsignalized intersections range from 35 to 50 seconds.
LOS “F”—All vehicles at signalized intersections can be expected to wait through more than a single signal
cycle with average delays in excess of 80 seconds, while delays to side street / STOP controlled approaches
at unsignalized intersections will exceed 50 seconds on average.
This Element includes intersection improvements that will reduce congestion at major arterial
intersections and links. These improvements, shown in Exhibits CE-1 and CE-2 and listed in the
Appendix, have been developed to meet the level of service standard adopted in Circulation Element
policies, based upon analysis using the computerized traffic model with traffic projections to the year
2030. Improvements included in this Element are those that require the least additional right-of-way
and cause the least environmental impacts. Because this analysis is long-term, some of the intersection
improvements listed may not be constructed exactly as described herein, or a particular improvement
may be shown to be unnecessary over the course of the next 25 years.
The City of Newport Beach has traditionally set LOS “D” as its goal for intersection performance,
whenever where possible. At the same time, the City has recognized that achieving this goal in every
case would requireEstablishing and maintaining a target requires a circulation system with oversized
elements to accommodate summerbalance between goals such as accessibility for all travel modes
congestion, delay, emergency response, community character, and capital expenditure. It is also
important to recognize that some sources of traffic (such as summertime beach traffic or regional
through traffic. The City has chosen to provide a circulation system that is sized to meet the needs of
residents and local businesses and respects the character of Newport Beach. This Circulation Element
continues that longstanding practice. The vast majority of intersections in Newport Beach will continue
to function at or better than ) may expand to use any new capacity provided. In the past, LOS “D” with
implementation of the improvements included in this Element, and policy establishes LOS “D” as the
standard for most intersections. LOS “E” is the was established standard for a limited number of
intersections discussed below.
The Airport Area is heavily impacted by through traffic accessing JWA, and intense development in the
Irvine Business Complex. The circulation improvements that would be necessary to accommodate
traffic from these sources and achieve LOS “D” would be extremely expensive, and would be contrary
to the desires of Newport Beach residents expressed during the Visioning Process for this General Plan.
For these reasons, LOS “E” is the standard for any intersection in the Airport Area shared with the City
of Irvine (which has established LOS “E” as its standardthe goal in the adjacent Irvine Business
Complex).
Coast Highway through Mariners’ Mile is significantly impacted by through trafficairport area and
summer beach traffic, and also experiences considerable pedestrian and bicycle activity. The
improvements that would be necessary to achieve LOS “D” at the Dover Drive intersection
would require the
71
Ci rculat i o n Eleme n t
7-10 Newport Bea c h Gener a l Pla n
elimination of sidewalk that could compromise bicycle and pedestrian safety, and would have adverse
impacts on adjacent residential neighborhoods and the local business community. Therefore, LOS “E”
is the established standard for this intersection.
specific intersections in Corona del Mar is a pedestrian oriented, neighborhood serving commercial area that is
being upgraded consistent with the Corona del Mar Vision Plan that has received overwhelming community
support. The goal of this plan is to create a more pedestrian friendly commercial area with improved aesthetics and
an attractive streetscape. Coast Highway, the primary route through Corona del Mar, carries a large amount of
through traffic during the morning and evening peak hour periods. The improvements that would be necessary to
achieve LOS “D” at the intersections of Marguerite Avenue and Goldenrod Avenue would be contrary to the goals
and efforts of the Corona del Mar community. For these intersections, LOS “E” is the standard set by policy in the
Circulation Element.to achieve the desired balance.
In addition to specific intersection improvements that can be identified at this time, future operational
issues may arise in the vicinity of closely spaced intersections or other locations where analysis of
isolated intersections does not accurately depict the quality of traffic flow. Potential examples include
the Bristol Street couplet, freeway interchanges, or the intersections of San Miguel Drive at Avocado
Avenue and at MacArthur Boulevard. The Circulation element includes policy for the City to monitor
these locations and make adjustments as appropriate in the future.
A traffic analysis of the General Plan update will forecast future traffic volumes, analyze intersection performance,
and identify necessary roadway and intersection improvements to maintain LOS D. Once those needs are
determined, the City of Newport Beach will consider all goals and will review the Master Plan of Streets and
Highways.
Recently, the State has made changes to the measurement of transportation impacts under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As of July 2020, all jurisdictions must analyze vehicle miles traveled (VMT)
for the purposes of CEQA. While VMT contributes to congestion, by itself it cannot be used to measure congestion
impacts or congestion relief. VMT is a good measure of effects contributing to climate change. Newport Beach is
concerned about climate change and sea level rise and adopted the Vehicle Miles Traveled Implementation Guide
in May 2020 and requires the analysis of VMT for the purposes of CEQA. However, Newport Beach originally
established the Traffic Phasing Ordinance in 1978, which requires analysis of vehicle LOS when planning
transportation improvements in coordination with land use development. In addition, vehicle LOS analysis is still
required by the Orange County CMP. Therefore, the City of Newport Beach requires the analysis of VMT for the
purposes of CEQA and also requires the analysis of vehicle LOS for compliance with the Traffic Phasing Ordinance
and the CMP.
SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH
The Safe System approach takes a holistic approach to reduce fatal and serious injuries occurring on roadways. The
first core principle of the Safe System approach is to view fatal and serious injuries as unacceptable and accept the
72
Ci rculat i o n Eleme n t
7-11 Newport Beach G e n e r a l Pl an
ethical imperative to reduce and eliminate their occurrence. Human bodies, especially those using non-motorized
transportation, are vulnerable and have limited tolerance for crash forces before sustaining serious injury. Because
humans make mistakes, transportation systems should be designed to accommodate those mistakes and limit crash
forces. Designing for safety should be proactive with risks identified and mitigated rather than reacting after crashes.
The responsibility for safety is shared by roadway users, roadway managers, and vehicle manufacturers. Designing
for safety also means planning for redundancy so that one failure does not necessitate a bad outcome. The Safe
System approach adds layers of protection by improving the safety of roadway users, vehicles, travel speeds, and
roadway design while also improving post-crash care.
In the past, roadway speeds were set by roadway users through speed surveys conducted according to the California
Vehicle Code and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Assembly Bill 43 (Friedman) was
signed into law in 2021 and will permit local agencies more flexibility starting in 2024 to consider vulnerable groups
when setting lower speed limits than identified by speed surveys. The City of Newport Beach will incorporate traffic
safety improvement projects in the annual Capital Improvement Program and will consider vulnerable groups when
setting speed limits when permitted by State law, consistent with a Safe Systems approach.
TRUCK TRAFFIC
Trucks are needednecessary to provide delivery of heavydeliver goods to residences and commercial areas, and for
other purposes such as pick up of, collect refuse, and service utilities throughout the City. However, the City needs
to control and limit truck traffic to minimize the Newport Beach. Truck trips can, however, result in noise and other
impacts onto residents, avoid undue damage to infrastructure and minimize the potential for increase traffic
congestion. Commercial vehicles are generally permitted on City of Newport Beach roads., and shorten the lifespan
of infrastructure. Commercial vehicles weighing in excess of 3 tons (6,000 pounds) are prohibited from certain
roadways, as signedwhen posted. Concentrated periods of high truck traffic, such as during construction of large
development projects, have increased potential for noise, congestion, and roadway damage impacts. The City of
Newport Beach could control and limit those impacts by reviewing and approving construction management plans
for large development projects in addition to monitoring construction traffic associated with residential projects.
REGIONAL FACILITIES
Regional transportation facilities serve the needs of travelers through Newport Beach, and residents
and workers that travel between Newport Beach and other locations. Major roadway system features
such as freeways, airports, and marine terminals serve regional traffic.
The facilities that provide regional access to Newport Beach include the I-405 Freeway, SR-55 Freeway, SR-73
freeway/tollway and Coast Highway (Highway 1).Many different agencies plan and operate regional transportation
facilities that are used by residents of Newport Beach and vehicles passing through Newport Beach. These include
the State, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), OCTA, the Transportation Corridor
Agencies (TCA), and neighboring cities. The County of Orange owns and operates John Wayne Airport, which is a
generator of special use traffic neighboring Newport Beach. The City of Newport Beach coordinates with outside
agencies on matters relevant to the mobility of Newport Beach residents.
73
Ci rculat i o n Eleme n t
7-12 Newport Bea c h Gener a l Pla n
The State, through the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), is the owner/operator of major regional
routes used by Newport Beach residents including I-405, SR-55, Newport Boulevard, and Coast Highway. Coast
Highway is owned and operated by Caltrans with the exception of the segment between Jamboree Road and
Newport Coast Drive. Newport Boulevard from Finley Street to the northerly city limits at Industrial Way is also
under Caltrans jurisdiction. Caltrans controls the signal timing and signal coordination along these roadways, and.
The City needs to workof Newport Beach coordinates with Caltrans related to signal timing and seeks greater
coordination related to meet Newport Beach’s needs and desires to provide a coordinated and efficient
circulationincorporating emerging technology and the latest transportation system management techniques.
Regional traffic interacting with Newport Beach generally accesses the City roadway system through
Coast Highway or other connections from the 405, 55 and 73 freeways/tollway. Ramp intersections are
maintained and controlled by Caltrans. Ramp capacity constraints can sometimes (during peak hours)
slow access to the freeway system, potentially resulting in a back-up of freeway traffic onto the local
roadway system. Conversely, traffic exiting the freeway system can sometimes cause congestion that
affects the freeway mainline.
Air travel for residents, workers, and visitors in Orange County is served by JWA (located just northwest
of Campus Drive along the City boundary), which is owned and operated by the County of Orange.
JWA is a part of the regional system of airports. JWA is presently authorized to serve 10.3 million annual
passengers (MAP), which increases to 10.8 MAP on January 1, 2011.
SCAG is the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for preparing the Regional Transportation
Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) for Southern California. The RTP/SCS is prepared every four
years and outlines the region’s vision for use of regional facilities and delivery of mobility. The City of Newport
Beach provides local data for the RTP/SCS process to ensure Newport Beach is accurately represented and provides
feedback on draft strategies.
As previously mentioned, OCTA is the regional agency responsible for overseeing the regional transportation
system, the County Master Plan of Arterial Highways, and local agency compliance with regional and statewide
programs such as the CMP, which is prepared every two years. The CMP roadways within Newport Beach are Coast
Highway, Newport Boulevard, MacArthur Boulevard, and Jamboree Road. The City of Newport Beach provides
local data for the CMP preparation. OCTA also prepares a Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) every four
years that establishes a vision for Orange County mobility that is submitted to SCAG for inclusion in the RTP/SCS.
The City of Newport Beach monitors the LRTP and provides feedback related to the needs of Newport Beach
residents. The TCA operates the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor (SR-73). The City of Newport Beach is
a partner in this joint powers’ authority.
OCTA provides a forum for communication and coordination between neighboring jurisdictions for the efficient
delivery of mobility across jurisdictional borders through regional plans such as the MPAH, Commuter Bikeways
Strategic Plan, and OC Go. One example of effective cross-jurisdictional coordination has been the Regional Traffic
Signal Synchronization Program. The City of Newport Beach coordinates with neighboring jurisdictions seeking
effective planning and delivery of transportation facilities.
74
Ci rculat i o n Eleme n t
7-13 Newport Beach G e n e r a l Pl an
JWA is a part of the regional system of airports serving air travel for Orange County residents, workers, and visitors.
The Newport Beach Aviation Committee assists the City in the implementation of Council Policy A-17 (Newport
Beach Council Airport Policy).
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
Transit services are provided by OCTA Fixed route bus service and throughon-demand paratransit
programs, such as in Newport Beach (and all of Orange County) is operated by OCTA. One of the one
provided by the Oasis Senior Center and/or OCTA. The program at the Oasis Senior Center provides
local transportation for a nominal fee to seniors.
An established network of bus routes provides access to employment centers, shopping and recreational areas within
the City. OCTA periodically updates a Countywide Bus Service Implementation Program (BSIP), which includes
changes to service levels and route configurations. OCTA also provides enhanced service during the summer
months to serve the beach oriented traffic destined for Newport Beach.in Newport Beach connects the Newport
Transportation Center and Park-and-Ride facility is (located at MacArthur Boulevard and San Joaquin Hills Road
in Newport Center.) to the countywide bus network. In order to maintain State mandated revenue/cost balance,
OCTA occasionally revises their service schedule. During periods of increased public transportation use, service
routes are extended and new routes may be added. During periods of decreased public transportation use, service
areas with the lowest ridership are contracted. OCTA’s most recent review of bus service, the Bus 360 program,
concentrated bus service in the central part of Orange County and reduced bus service in South Orange County
and the periphery.
OC Go Project V provides funding for community-based transit/circulators. The Newport Beach summer shuttle
service on the Balboa Peninsula is partially funded by Project V. The City of Newport Beach would consider pilot
programs for other shuttle routes, potentially connecting the villages within Newport Beach.
The extensive use of rideshare services has been one of the factors leading to declining bus ridership. As part of the
Bus 360 program, OCTA even tested use of rideshare operators to provide on-demand mobility service in lieu of
reduced fixed route service. In some markets, rideshare drivers have begun offering subscription rates for customers
with regular medical appointments. The trend is clearly toward more trips being taken with this travel mode and the
City of Newport Beach is considering ways to accommodate the demand such as designating curbside drop-off
zones in commercial areas.
TRAILS
Trail systems, while providing alternates provide functional alternatives to automobile travel, also provide and
recreational opportunities for the community. The existing trail system in Newport Beach has been developed to
provide access for commuter and recreational bicyclists, along with pedestrians, and equestrians.
Bicycle Trails
75
Ci rculat i o n Eleme n t
7-14 Newport Bea c h Gener a l Pla n
Bikeway is a term usedThis Circulation Element incorporates the 2014 City of Newport Beach Bicycle Master Plan
and any future updates to designate all that plan. The Bicycle Master Plan identifies four types of bicycle facilities
which provide.
1. Bicycle Path (Caltrans Class I). Provides for bicycle travel. The City of on a paved right-of-way
separated from any street or highway. Includes sidewalk adjacent to street.
Newport Beach Master Plan of Bikeways
provides the following types of facilities:
1. Bicycle Lane. A lane in the street, either the parking lane or a separate lane, designated for the
exclusive or semi-exclusive use of bicycles. Through travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians is
not allowed, vehicle parking may or may not be allowed. Cross flow by motorists to gain access
to driveways and parking facilities is allowed. Separation from the motor vehicle travel way is
normally by a painted solid stripe. Bicycle lanes and bicycle routes together are also known as
Class 3 bicycle trails.
2. Bicycle Route. A shared right-of-way for bicycle operation, whether or not it is specified by
signs or markings. All main streets and highways by authority of the California Vehicle Code
include bicycle routes as defined herein. Bicycle lanes and bicycle routes together are also
known as Class 3 bicycle trails.
76
Ci rculat i o n Eleme n t
7-15 Newport Beach G e n e r a l Pl an
2. Bicycle Lane (Caltrans Class II). Provides a striped and stenciled lane for bicycle travel on a street or
highway.
3. Bicycle Route (Caltrans Class III). Provides for a shared use with motor vehicle traffic and may be
identified by signing. Stencil markings identifying a recommended position for bicycles may also be
provided.
4. Bicycle Trail. AProvides a dirt pathway designated for the use of bicycles which is physicallyand pedestrians
completely separated from motor vehicle traffic. Pedestrian traffic
Subsequent to adoption of the Bicycle Master Plan, Caltrans has included an additional classification of bicycle
facility in the Highway Design Manual and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. A Class IV
Bikeway (also known as a cycle track) is an on-road facility separated from vehicle traffic by a physical barrier. The
City may or may not be excluded. Bicycle trails are also known as Class 1 bicycle trailsincorporate this type of facility
into the Bicycle Master Plan in the future.
3. Backbone Bikeway. Backbone bikeways are major through bikeways, as shown on the Master
Plan of Bikeways. They are primarily on major roads. Backbone bikeways may connect to regional
trails, as shown in the Master Plan.
4. Secondary Bikeway. Secondary bikeways connect to backbone trails and serve cyclists and
children riding to and from school. Secondary bikeways may also be a bicycle lane, route, or trail.
The city has designated additional off road facilities in the form of sidewalk bikeways which provide
improved bike safety for recreational riders and children within high use corridors in the vicinity of
schools, beaches, and residential neighborhoods.
The facility needs of bicyclists will vary with the function of the trip and the speed and skill level of the rider. Those
residents who use bicycles daily for their primary means of transportation are concerned with utilizinglikely prefer
the most convenient and direct route available to reach their destination. These bicyclists normally will select a route
along a primary or a major highway. In contrast, the recreational rider might choose a route for its scenic interest
such as a ride on a bike trail separated from vehicular traffic. New or infrequent bicycle riders may prefer a route
separated from vehicle travel or along a route with low vehicle volume and speeds. Thus, it is necessary to provide
bikeways for bicyclists along major transportation corridors as well as residential and scenic areas.alternative routes.
It is also necessary to provide bikeways which separate faster cyclists from pedestrian travel and slower cyclists,
integrating bicycle travel more closely with vehicular traffic, and bikeways which separate slower cyclists from motor
vehicle traffic.
The Circulation Element considers additional bikeways that could be developed in the Newport Beach
area, as well as the safety of bicyclists in Newport Beach.
The City has designated additional off-road facilities in the form of sidewalk bikeways, which provide improved
bicycle safety for children within high use corridors in the vicinity of schools, beaches, and residential
neighborhoods. The City will periodically review the Bicycle Sidewalk Resolution to determine whether areas
permitting bicycle use on sidewalks are serving the intended purpose, whether additional permitted areas are
77
Ci rculat i o n Eleme n t
7-16 Newport Bea c h Gener a l Pla n
desirable, and whether restrictions on use (e.g., bicycle speed limits) are warranted. Review of the Bicycle Sidewalk
Resolution and strategies for separating faster cyclists from pedestrians and slower cyclists will become more
important due to the emergence of electric-assisted bicycles (e-bikes).
Researchers have noted the rapid uptake of e-bikes by consumers, that e-bikes are more likely than standard bicycles
to replace car trips, and that trips with e-bikes are longer than trips with standard bicycles. The availability of e-bikes
also expands the potential group of users of bicycle facilities and the range of all users of those facilities. This
emerging technology may improve the mobility of Newport Beach residents, but the City would like to ensure that
the benefits to some do not come at the expense of safety to other users and residents.
Pedestrian Corridors
Newport Beach has a variety of pedestrian and multi-use facilities. These include sidewalks inthrough
developed areas, the oceanfront boardwalk on the Balboa Peninsula, bayfront walkways on Balboa
Island and parts of Balboa Peninsula and Mariners’ Mile, and trails along Upper Newport Bay and in
open space areas. Coastal areas see high pedestrian activity is high in coastal areas such asincluding
Balboa Island, Balboa Peninsula, and Corona del Mar, with high numbersand Mariners’ Mile. High
volumes of pedestrians crossingcross Coast Highway through Mariners’ Mile.
Newport Beach has Where there are opportunities to provide more pedestrian, the City of Newport Beach will
consider providing more Bayfront walkways along the bayfront on Balboa Peninsula and Mariners’ Mile. As
properties in these areas are developed pursuant to the Land Use Element, there will be opportunities to enhance
and increaseThese walkways will help to accommodate high pedestrian volumes while also providing an alternative
network separate from high vehicle volume streets. Closing low volume minor streets and alleys and creating
pedestrian promenades or activity and reduce driving.areas can also be a strategy to create a pedestrian friendly
network while activating a business district. In addition, overhead pedestrian crossings should be considered to
improve pedestrian safety.
Equestrian Trails
Equestrian trails are primarily located in the Santa Ana Heights portion of the City. These trails, and other equestrian
facilities, are highly valued by residents of this area and provide regional recreation opportunities as well.
78
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT/COMPLETE STREETS
While alternative modes such as bicycles have always been permitted to use the roadway network, the Complete
Streets Act (Assembly Bill 1358) requires that Circulation Elements “plan for a balanced multimodal transportation
network that meets the needs of all users of streets, roads, and highways, defined to include motorists, pedestrians,
bicyclists, children, persons with disabilities, seniors, movers of commercial goods, and users of public
transportation, in a manner that is suitable to the rural, suburban, or urban context of the general plan.” Providing
a balance for multiple modes is one strategy toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions and combating climate
change consistent with the City’s goals of reducing risks to residents from climate change and sea level rise.
Additionally, research shows that a multimodal transportation system, encouraging choice of bicycle walking and
rolling modes, can enhance local economic development and improve public health. The City of Newport Beach
will use the Orange County Council of Governments (OCCOG) Complete Streets Initiative Design Handbook to
develop the City’s complete streets master plan.
Planning for a balanced multimodal transportation network does not mean that every street allocates equal space to
all travel modes. In fact, satisfactory service levels are difficult to provide on all streets for all travel modes due to
the competing interests between modes. Automobile friendly streets have high travel speeds, wide lanes, and
separate turn lanes all of which decrease pedestrian service levels. Rather than trying to simultaneously serve
competing needs, the City of Newport Beach favors a layered network approach to complete streets planning. In a
layered network, a street is prioritized for a particular travel mode (or multiple travel modes benefiting from similar
characteristics), but the network as a whole provides for the mobility of all users of roadways.
EMERGING TECHNOLOGY
The City of Newport Beach has used and continues to use technology to improve the delivery and performance of
mobility. Transportation System Management techniques have been used to enhance capacity without physical
roadway widening while retaining the community character and limiting the impact of the roadway system on the
environment. Examples of Transportation System Management improvements include intelligent transportation
system improvements at traffic signals, traffic signal coordination and improvements to roadway signage along busy
routes (especially to tourist destinations), and the completion of the traffic management center in City Hall allowing
for traffic monitoring and remote signal operation. The City also replaced old street lighting to more efficient LED
fixtures to reduce electricity consumption and the City’s carbon footprint.
Technology is changing rapidly, and the City of Newport Beach will respond to the challenges and opportunities
presented by emerging technology. The number of electric vehicles (EV) using our roadways will continue to grow
and have fueling needs that are distinct from gasoline powered vehicles. Rideshare services continue to grow
ridership and simultaneously the need for designated places to drop-off and pick-up are growing. Wayfinding apps
help people to navigate our roadways, but the directions provided do not always show the most direct route or
respect roadway classification. Traditional engineering techniques may not be effective in redirecting this source of
traffic volume and the City of Newport Beach is investigating potential strategies.
Vehicles with limited self-driving capability are already on our roadways. On the horizon, the City anticipates that
vehicle-to-everything (V2X) infrastructure improvements will be needed to accommodate and realize the advantages
79
offered by connected and autonomous vehicles. Potential advantages from connected vehicles include feedback
regarding roadway maintenance needs, uniform traffic flows, real time signal synchronization, improved safety for
drivers and other travel modes, and reduced GHG emissions. While the City of Newport Beach is aware of what is
happening now and what is anticipated in the near future, the City must remain flexible and adapt to rapidly changing
transportation options in order to experience the benefits offered while avoiding the pitfalls of change.
TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT
With the exception of summer beach traffic, Newport Beach roads are most heavily traveled during the
morning and evening commutes. Implementation of Transportation Systems Management (TSM) or
The City of Newport Beach retains the Travel Demand Management (TDM) measures can reduce peak
hour traffic and possibly result in intersection service levels better than those forecast in this Element
and the General Plan Traffic Study. In some jurisdictions, transportation demand management (TDM)
plans/programs have reduced peak hour traffic by 10 to 15 percent.
TSM techniques involve enhancing capacity without physical roadway widening, and can help to retain
the community character and limit the impact of the roadway system on the environment. Examples of
TSM improvements include traffic signal timing improvements, traffic signal coordination along a route
and improvements to roadway signage, especially for tourist destinations.
The City’s TDM Ordinance requiresrequiring projects to reduce the number of peak-period vehicle trips by
promotingproviding facilities to support alternate modes and encouraging the use of alternative transportation
modes, such as ridesharing, carpools, vanpools, public transit, bicycles and walking; and provide facilities that
support such alternate modes. TDM methods are enhanced by incorporating employment near residential uses,
providing incentives for alternative/multi-user modes, etc. Employers with large work forces can utilize all of these
techniques, while smaller companies are typically limited to ridesharing and flextime programs., and walking.
Employers can also offer flexible work schedules, including work-from-home. Some TDM strategies will reduce
VMT generated by a land use. All of these techniques are enhanced by emerging technologies. Adopting TDM
measures not only reduces peak-period vehicle trips and associated GHG emissions but could also reduce parking
demand.
CURB SIDE MANAGEMENT
Newport Beach manages curb side space seeking the best use for the community needs. Prohibitions, fee
assessment, or time limits are used to induce turnover and ensure availability, perform maintenance such as street
sweeping, preserve sight distance, or provide right-turn lanes.
Within commercial districts, time limitations and metered parking are common. Novel parking management may
provide greater benefit to Newport Beach residents and visitors. Strategies such as valet and loading zones could
reduce vehicle loads on side streets and alleys. Designating rideshare or delivery space could accommodate emerging
trends. Curb side right of way could also be used as exchange areas for shared non-motorized transportation. Some
of these novel parking management strategies could reduce passenger car use.
80
Within residential districts, parking demand can overflow from commercial districts or private residential property
onto public residential streets. Management of curb side right of way can help to provide equal access for all of the
district’s residents.
CLIMATE CHANGE
Newport Beach is concerned about climate change and sea level rise. As seen in other parts of the country, climate
change can increase the frequency and intensity of natural emergencies. The City of Newport Beach is planning for
these contingencies using tsunami warning signs, evacuation planning and battery back-up systems for traffic signals.
Initiatives included in the Circulation Element such as planning for a balanced multimodal network including
support for additional transit facilities in higher density areas and measures to reduce VMT help to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change. The City of Newport Beach intends to do more to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change. On City property, the City can provide more EV charging
stations, bicycle parking, and other supporting facilities. The City can encourage or require these supporting facilities
on privately owned property within Newport Beach. The City can also encourage local businesses to establish and
maintain telework programs in addition to carpooling/vanpooling.
PARKING
Similar to other coastal communities, parking availability is limited in the coastal portions of Newport
Beachcitywide, especially in some areas during the peak summer months. Areas of Newport Beach that were largely
subdivided prior to widespread adoption of the automobile are areas of particular concern (i.e., Balboa Peninsula,
Balboa Island, Mariners’ Mile, and Corona Del Mar, and West Newport are areas of particular concern.). The Balboa
PeninsulaVillage Parking Management Overlay Plan included parking surveys/studies and recommendations,
which. The City of Newport Beach has begunimplemented some of the recommendations (i.e., beginning to
implement, as follows: parking meter time limits (ongoing), visitor parking guide,, providing bus layover area
(completed), additional red curbing to improve areas, improving intersection visibility (completed), with additional
red curbing, and monitoring lot utilization). Implementing additional recommendations is being considered
including increasing parking meter fees, consolidating public parking, and initiating a shared parking program.
Similar Parking Management Overlay plans could be implemented in other activity areas including Corona del Mar,
Mariners’ Mile, McFadden Wharf, Cannery Village, and Balboa Island.
Technology changes make other innovative solutions possible. The City of Newport Beach uses a smartphone app
to allow remote payment of fees at parking meters, which has increased meter fees (ongoing), businesscompliance.
This program could be expanded to provide the location of and directions to available parking spaces, which could
reduce circling while looking for a parking space and the congestion those movements cause. Increased use of
rideshare services may reduce parking demand for some land uses or in some areas of Newport Beach. Future
review of off-street parking requirements may allow reuse of vehicle parking spaces for bicycle parking or could
permit program, consolidating public parking, monitoring of lot utilization (ongoing), Balboa Pier lot validation
program, and a shared parking program. Valet services have also been suggested for both the Balboa Peninsula and
Mariners’ Mile.reallocation of curbside space. Alternatives for management of curbside space include valet or
rideshare pick-up/drop-off and deliveries, further supporting a trend toward less private vehicle parking.
TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
81
Newport Beach receives funding for transportation improvements from gasoline tax apportionment, county, state,
and (including SB-1), OC Go (also known as Measure M) local turnback, OC Go competitive programs, the State,
federal funds and , developer fees (i.e., the Traffic Phasing Ordinance, and Fair Share Traffic Contribution
Ordinance,), and the General Fund. The City’s Traffic Phasing Ordinance has been in effect since 1978. It requires
developer The City of Newport Beach leverages City resources to improve the chances of winning competitive
funding of a proportional share of intersection improvements when a proposed project has a direct negative impact
on the level of service at that intersection. This ordinance phases intersection improvements with development to
maintain the City’s standards for level of traffic service. The City’s Fair Share Ordinance, which was adopted in
1984, establishes a fee, based upon the unfunded cost to implement the Master Plan of Streets and Highways, to be
paid in conjunction with the issuance of a building permit.sources (e.g., MacArthur Boulevard improvements,
Superior Avenue pedestrian bridge, and more). The effect of revisions to CEQA measuring transportation impacts
in terms of VMT on developer fees is not known at this time. A regional VMT mitigation program, if established,
may offer a new funding source for public transit or alternative transportation projects.
The City of Newport Beach will have additional expenditures in the future to adapt existing infrastructure with
emerging technology, including traffic signal improvements for compatibility with connected and autonomous
vehicles. The City of Newport Beach is considering potential sources of funding for these expenditures.
82
Goals and Policies
Mobility
Goal
CE 1.1
An overall transportation system that facilitates the movement of people and goods within and through the City of
Newport Beach and accommodates conservative growth within the City of Newport Beach, but is not expanded
primarily to accommodate growth in the surrounding region.
Policies
CE 1.1.1 Comprehensive Transportation System
Provide a diverse transportation system that provides mobility options for the
community. (Imp 16.8, 16.11)
CE 1.1.2 Integrated System of Multiple Modes
Provide an integrated transportation system that supports the land use plan set forth in
the Land Use Element. (Imp 2.1)
CE 1.1.3 Levels of Service Related to Community Character
EstablishMaintain level of service standards that reflect the character of the various
unique districts and neighborhoods of Newport Beach. (Imp 16.2, 16.4, 16.6, 16.7)
Goal
CE 1.2
Reduced summertime visitor traffic impacts.
Policies
CE 1.2.1 Wayfinding
Implement way-finding signs, especially for vehicles and pedestrians, specifically for
tourist destinations.destination areas. (Imp 16.7)
CE 1.2.2 Shuttle Service
Encourage and maintain remote visitor parking and shuttle services. (Imp 14.4)
CE 1.2.3 Internal Shuttle
Study the potential of implementing a pilot program, for a shuttle system connecting
the villages of Newport Beach. (Imp 16.8)
83
CE 1.2.34 Traffic System Management
Identify andContinue to implement measures, such as special traffic signal timing, to
reduce the impact of high-volume summer traffic on persons living along and around
the beach and bay, as well as visitors. (Imp 16.7)
CE 1.2.45 Public Transit
Support and encourage OCTA efforts to provide / fund summertime expanded bus
service and/or local shuttle services to reduce visitor traffic. (Imp 16.8)
Goa l
CE 1.3
Truck routes that support goods movement to and from land use in the City while minimizing adverse
impacts to residents or businesses.
Policies
CE 1.3.1 Truck Routes
Allow truck use of City streets except selected residential and arterial streets
adjacent to residential areas necessary to minimize impacts of truck traffic on
residential areas. (Imp 16.9)
CE 1.3.2 Impacts of Trucks
Provide appropriately designed and maintained roadways to safely accommodate
truck travel and minimize noise and vibration. (Imp 16.9)
CE 1.3.3 Management of Truck Activities
Actively manage trucking activities related to oversize loads such as large boats
and comparable characteristics. (Imp 16.9)
Roadway System
Goal
CE 2.1
84
A roadway system with no significant gaps that provides for the efficient movement of goods and people in the
City of Newport Beach, while maintaining the community’s character and its residents’ quality of life.
Policies
CE 2.1.1 Level of Service Standards
Plan the arterial roadway system to accommodate projected traffic at the following level
of service standards:
A. Level of Service (LOS) “D” throughout the City, unless otherwise noted
B. LOS “E” at any intersection in the Airport Area shared with Irvine, and in Corona
del Mar (subject to findings of the most recent General Plan update traffic study)
(Imp 16.3)
C. LOS “E” at Coast Highway (EW) and Dover Drive (NS) due to right-of-way
limitations
D. LOS “E” at Marguerite Avenue (NS) and Coast Highway (EW) in the
pedestrian oriented area of Corona del Mar
E. LOS “E” at Goldenrod Avenue (NS) and Coast Highway (EW) in the
pedestrian oriented area of in Corona del Mar (Imp 16.3)
CE 2.1.2 Street and Highway Network
Construct the circulation system described on the map entitled Newport Beach
Circulation Element-Master Plan of Streets and Highways shown in Figure CE1 and
Figure CE2 (cross-section). (Imp 14.9, 16.3)
CE 2.1.3 Current Traffic Data
Monitor traffic conditions on an ongoing basis and update Master Plan as necessary.
(Imp 16.4)
CE 2.1.4 Roadway Improvements
Pursue construction of intersection improvements shown on Figure CE3(subject to
findings of the most recent General Plan update traffic study) or alternate improvements
that achieve an acceptable level of service. (Imp 16.3)
CE 2.1.5 MacArthur Boulevard Widening
Plan the addition of lanes to MacArthur Boulevard between Harbor View Drive and
the prolongation of Crown Drive so that more than four lanes are constructed only
when the daily volume to capacity ratio equals or exceeds 1.0 in that section of
MacArthur Boulevard, not counting trips generated by the MacArthur Boulevard access
drive to Corona del mar Plaza, and after public hearings before the Planning
Commission and City Council, and only by narrowing the median. (Imp 16.3)
CE 2.1.6 Protection of Right-of-Way
85
Protect right-of-way for designated future streets and highways through all practicable
means. (Imp 2.1)
Goal
CE 2.2
A safe and efficient roadway system.
Policies
CE 2.2.1 Safe Roadways
Provide for safe roadway conditions by adhering to nationally recognized improvement
standards and uniform construction and maintenance practices. (Imp 16.4, 16.6)
CE 2.2.2 Safe System Approach
Evaluate traffic collision data annually and review best practices for safe circulation
systems and implement appropriate technologies/infrastructure consistent with the
industry recognized Safe System principles. Incorporate traffic safety improvement
projects in the annual Capital Improvement Program. (Imp 16.2, 16.4)
CE 2.2.3 Up-to-Date Standards
Periodically review and update street standards to current multimodal capacity and
safety practices. (Imp 16.4, 16.6)
CE 2.2.34 Traffic Control
Design traffic control measures to ensure City streets and roads function with safety
and efficiency. for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. (Imp 16.7)
CE 2.2.45 Driveway and Access Limitations
Limit driveway and local street access on arterial streets to maintain a desired quality of
traffic flow. and limit hazards to active transportation modes. Wherever possible,
consolidate and/or reduce the number of driveways and implement access controls
during redevelopment of adjacent parcels. (Imp 16.1)
CE 2.2.56 Neighborhood Traffic Calming
Balance safety, quality of life, and efficiency when considering cut-through traffic and
traffic calming improvements to local neighborhood streets. Address neighborhood
traffic concerns through City Council Policy L-26. (Imp 16.6)
CE 2.2.67 Emergency Access
Provide all residential, commercial, and industrial areas with efficient and safe access for
emergency vehicles. An emergency evacuation map shall be prepared as part of an
updated Safety Element. (Imp 16.6)
86
CE 2.2.78 Alleys
Alleys in new developments shall be 20’ wide to facilitate circulation. (Imp 8.1)
Goal
CE 2.3
Optimal roadway system operation.
Policies
CE 2.3.1 Coast Highway Ownership
Pursue ownership of Coast Highway throughout Newport Beach, as opportunities arise,
so that Coast Highway can be improved to its ultimate width in Mariners’ Mile
consistent with the City’s visionMaster Plan of Streets and Highways and the OCTA
Master Plan of Arterial Highways and to provide the City with more opportunities to
increase operational efficiencies. (Imp 2.1, 14.9)
CE 2.3.2 Roadway Maintenance
Support roadway maintenance programs that inspect, repair, and rehabilitate pavement surfaces and
sidewalks in order to preserve the high quality of City streets and thoroughfares. (Imp 16.4)
CE 2.3.3 New Development Maintenance Responsibility
Ensure minimization of traffic congestion impacts and parking impacts and ensure
proper roadway maintenance through review and approval of Construction
Management Plans associated with new development proposals in residential
neighborhoods. (Imp 8.1, 16.9)
CE 2.3.34 Traffic Conditions Data Base
Monitor traffic conditions and optimize traffic signal operations and coordination on
an ongoing basis. (Imp 16.2)
CE 2.3.45 Improvements to Reflect Changing Traffic Conditions
Based on the monitoring of traffic conditions, consider additional improvements in
areas with operations issues, such as intersections with heavy turn volumes (e.g..,
additional turn lanes, traffic signal progression, etc.). (Imp 16.2)
CE 2.3.6 San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor
Work with the Transportation Corridor Agency (TCA) to create improvement strategies
and funding mechanisms to address regional through traffic created by the toll road
along East Coast Highway and within the area of influence of the San Joaquin Hills
Transportation Corridor.
Goal
87
CE 1.32.4
Truck routes that support goods movement to and from land use in the City while minimizing adverse impacts to
residents or businesses.
Policies
CE 1.3.12.4.1 Truck Routes
Allow truck use of City streets except selected residential and arterial streets adjacent to
residential areas and school zones necessary to minimize impacts of truck traffic on
residential areas. (Imp 16.9)
CE 1.3.22.4.2 Impacts of Trucks
Provide appropriately designed and maintained roadways to safely accommodate truck
travel and minimize noise and vibration. (Imp 16.9)
CE 1.3.32.4.3 Management of Truck Activities
Actively manage trucking activities related to oversize loads such as large boats and
comparable characteristics. (Imp 16.9)
CE 2.4.4 Construction Management Plans
Develop program to require CMP for large developments to address haul routes, hours
of operation, and number of truck trips. (Imp 16.9)
Regional Transportation
Goal
CE 3.1
A network of regional facilities which ensures the safe and efficient movement of people and goods from within
the City to areas outside its boundaries, and minimizes the use of City streets by regional through traffic.
Policies
CE 3.1.1 Freeway System
Encourage ongoing regional investment in the freeway system. (Imp 14.1, 14.3, 14.9,
14.10)
CE 3.1.2 Integration of Transportation Systems with Adjoining Communities and the
Region
Interface with regional and surrounding local agencies, such as Caltrans, OCTA, the
County of Orange, John Wayne Airport, the Cities of Irvine, Costa Mesa, and
Huntington Beach, and the University of California, Irvine to implement systems that
88
serve the needs of regional travelers (vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians) in a way that
minimizes impacts on Newport Beach residents. (Imp 14.9, 14.10, 16.5)
CE 3.1.3 Traffic from Adjoining Communities
Continue to monitor land development applications in adjacent communities and
encourage coordination on land development projects that affect traffic and mobility in
Newport Beach. (Imp 14.1)
CE 3.1.4 Regional Consistency
Maintain consistency between the City of Newport Beach Master Plan of Streets and
Highways (shown on Figure CE1) shall be consistent withand the Orange County
Master Plan of Arterial Highways. (Imp 16.5)
CE 3.1.45 Regional Traffic Mitigation
Continue to participate in programs (Orange County Congestion Management
Program, Growth Management ProgramSouthern California Association of
Governments Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy, etc.) to
mitigatereduce regional traffic congestion. (Imp 14.1, 14.3, 16.5)
CE 3.1.5 19th Street Bridge
CE 3.1.6 Santa Ana River Future Mobility Alternatives
Advocate for the implementationstudy and review of needed regional Master
Plantransportation improvements, and be a strong advocate for construction of the 19th
Street Bridge along and/or across the Santa Ana River, or alternativewhich reflects
current planning, that may include active transportation or neighborhood electric
vehicle improvements that achieve the same improvements in regional traffic
flow,reduce passenger car use, offer mobility choice, enhance recreation and community
health and reduce vehicle miles traveled without disproportionate impacts on Newport
Beach including Coast Highway, consistent with all environmental review requirements.
(Imp 16.5)
Public Transportation
Goal
CE 4.1
A public transportation system that provides mobility for residents and encourages use of public transportation as
an alternative to automobile travel.
Policies
CE 4.1.1 Public Transit Efficiency
89
Support efforts by OCTA and other agencies to increase the effectiveness and
productivity of transit services, possibly including local shuttle services. (Imp 14.4)
CE 4.1.2 Transit Services for Special Need Populations
Support efforts to increase accessible transit services and facilities for the elderly,
disabled, and other transportation disadvantaged persons. (Imp 16.8)
CE 4.1.3 Seasonal Public Transit
Coordinate with OCTA to provide seasonal, recreational, and special events shuttles.
(Imp 14.4, 16.8)
CE 4.1.4 Land Use Densities Supporting Public Transit
Accommodate residential densities sufficient to support transit patronage,
especially in mixed use areas such as the Airport Area. (Imp 2.1)
CE 4.1.5 John Wayne Airport Shuttles
Encourage the use of airport shuttle services to minimize the impacts of air travelers on
the local roadway system. (Imp 14.4, 16.8)
CE 4.1.65 Transit Support Facilities
ParticipateCooperate with OCTA in efforts to developprovide additional regional
transit support facilities, including park-and-ride lots, bus stops, and shelters. in higher
density residential areas or mixed-use development areas to reduce passenger car travel
through and within Newport Beach. (Imp 16.8)
CE 4.1.76 School Transit
Monitor the demand for additional private, public, and school transportation available
to serve the needs of K–12 students and advocate for improvements in traffic from
students. (Imp 14.2, 16.11)
Alternative Transportation Modes
Goal
CE 5.1
A transportation system that supports Complete Streets policies and design.
Policies
CE 5.1.1 Circulation Complete Streets System for All Users
Develop a Complete Streets master plan and design guide based upon best practices
(e.g., Orange County Council of Governments Complete Streets Initiative Design
Handbook, 2016) that prioritizes City rights of way to allow all users safe and efficient
90
mobility. Pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and transit riders of all ages and abilities are
able to safely move along and across the mobility system of Newport Beach. (Imp 16.1,
16.8, 16.11)
Goal
CE 5.2
Convenient bicycle trail systems that satisfy recreational desires and transportation needs.
Policies
CE 5.2.2 Integration of the Bicycle Master Plan
Review projects adopted in the 2014 Bicycle Master Plan, the 20-year program of bicycle
capital improvements to facilitate safe and efficient active transportation commute and
recreational mobility, annually and integrate bicycle projects into general mobility capital
improvement programming. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.2.3 Bicycle Master Plan Vision
Provide for a network of active transportation facilities consistent with the vision in the
current Newport Beach Bicycle Master Plan. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.2.4 Trail System
Promote construction of a comprehensive trail system as shown on Figure CE4.CE3 to
connect bicycle trails with hiking trails and transit routes. (Updated figure in process)
(Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.2 Pedestrian.5 Travel Mode Connectivity
Link residentialEnsure all active transportation networks are linked and provide
connectivity between transit, transit centers, and other major land uses such as village
areas, commercial centers, activity nodes, recreation facilities, schools, parks, and
commercial centersinstitutions so that residents can travel within the community
without driving. (Imp 16.8, 16.11, 20.1)
CE 5.1.3 2.6 Pedestrian Improvements in New Development Projects
Require new development projects to include safe and attractive sidewalks, walkways,
and bike lanes in accordance with the Master Plan, and, if feasible, trails. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.4 2.7 Linkages to Citywide Trail System and Neighborhoods
Require developers to construct links to the planned trail system, adjacent areas, and
communities where appropriate. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.5 2.8 Bikeway System
91
Cooperate with state, federal, county, and local agencies to coordinate bikeways and
trails throughout the region. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.6 2.9 Bikeway Legislation
Coordinate with local legislative delegation in Sacramento to address safety regulation
of bicycles and e-bikes, including training, education and modification to the California
Vehicle Code.
CE 5.2.10 Bicycle Supporting Facilities
Incorporate separate bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the design plans for new streets
and highways and, where feasible, in the plans for improving existing roads. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.7 2.11 Bicycle Supporting Amenities
Require bicycle facilities such as bike racks, bike stations, or lockers according to
national standards for long-term and short-term bicycle utilization on City property and
with new development and encourage the addition of such bicycle facilities within
existing development. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.2.12 Bicycle Safety
Provide for safety of conventional bicyclists, e-bicyclists, equestrians, and pedestrians
by adhering to current national standards and uniform practices. especially where modes
interact. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.8 2.13 Bicycle Conflicts with Vehicles and Pedestrians
Minimize conflict points among motorized traffic, pedestrians, and bicycle traffic.e-
bikes, and conventional bicycle traffic. Support increased enforcement activity for
bicycle and e-bike travel, with a focus on The Oceanfront Boardwalk and around school
zones. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.9 2.14 Integrated Bicycle Improvements
Coordinate community bicycle and pedestrian facilities in a citywide network for
continuity of travel. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.10 2.15 Bicycle Trail Signage
Develop and implement a uniform signing program to assist the public in locating,
recognizing, and utilizing public bikeways and trails. (Imp 16.11)
Goal
CE 5.3
Safe and complete active transportation alternatives near school zones.
Policies
92
CE 5.3.1 .11 School Access
Work with schools to promote walking, biking, safe drop-off, and other improvements.
(Imp 14.2, 16.11)
CE 5.3.2 School Coordination
Explore opportunities to create working group of decision makers at the City and the
school district to meet regularly to address safe school mobility, access and parking.
Goal
CE 5.4
Completion of pedestrian infrastructure where planned and necessary.
Policies
CE 5.4.1 .12 Pedestrian Street Crossings
Continue to implement improved pedestrian crossings, such as lighted crosswalk
installations, in key high-volume areas such as Corona Del Mar, Mariners’ Mile, West
Newport, Airport Area, Newport Center/Fashion Island, and the Balboa Peninsula. (Imp
16.11)
CE 5.1.13 4.2 Overhead Pedestrian Street Crossings
Consider overhead pedestrian crossings in areas where pedestrian use limits the
efficiency of the roadway or signalized intersection. and/or where an overhead crossing
provides for improved pedestrian safety. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.14 4.3 Newport Harbor Trails and Walkways
Develop and implement a long-range plan for public trails and walkways to access all
appropriate commercial areas of the harbor, as determined to be physically and
economically feasible including the following:
A. Extension of the Lido Marina Village boardwalk across all of the waterfront
commercial properties in Lido Village
B. Provide a continuous waterfront walkway along the Rhine Channel, connecting
Cannery Village and McFadden Square waterfront commercial areas with Las
Arenas Beach at 19th Street
C. Provide a walkway connecting the Lido Village area with Mariners’ Mile
D. Provide a continuous walkway along the Mariners’ Mile waterfront from the Coast
Highway/Newport Boulevard Bridge to the Balboa Bay Club (Policy HB 6.2) (Imp
16.11)
CE 5.1.154.4 Pedestrian Sidewalk Improvements
As part of the annual capital improvement planning, consider implementation and
construction of new sidewalks and improvements to sidewalks to result in comfortable
93
widths consistent with industry standards and appropriate for the street/neighborhood.
Provide for safe and ample opportunities to cross streets and design safe crosswalk
enhancements.
CE 5.4.5 Equestrian Trails
Maintain the existing equestrian trail system in Santa Ana Heights (Figure CE5).
CE4). (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.16 4.6 Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety
Provide for the safety of bicyclists and pedestrians through provision of adequate
facilities, including review of locations where sidewalk use by bicyclists is appropriate,
consideration of separate facilities for e-bikes or other semi-motorized modes, and
maintenance and construction of extra sidewalk width where feasible. (Imp 16.11)
Goal
CE 5.25
Enhanced and maintained public water transportation services and expanded public water transportation uses and
land support facilities. (Policy HB 6.5)
Policies
CE 5.25.1 Marine Terminals
Coordinate the location of marine terminals with other components of the
transportation system to ensure convenient multi-modal access and adequate parking.
(Policy HB 6.6) (Imp 16.12)
CE 5.5.2 Expanded Water Transportation Modes
Promote opportunities to expand water transportation modes, such as water-based
shuttle services and water taxisother nautical services. (Policy HB 6.7) (Imp 16.12)
94
95
Transportation Systems Management (TSM)/Travel Demand Management (TDM)
Emerging Technology
Goal
CE 6.1
An efficient circulation system through the use of transportation systems management.
Policies
CE 6.1.1 Traffic Signals
Improve traffic signal operations by optimizing signal timing, interconnecting
signalized intersections along arterial streets, and installing computerized
master traffic signal control systems in intensively utilized areas. (Imp 16.7)
CE 6.1.2 Intelligent Transportation Systems
Explore and implement intelligent transportation system and infrastructure
improvements which will reduce peak hour trafficimprove circulation system
performance from that forecast in this Element. (Imp16.4, 16.7
CE 6.1.3 Coordination with Adjacent Jurisdictions
Coordinate operations with adjacent jurisdictions to enhance the efficiency of
inter-jurisdictional roadway system operations. (Imp 14.1, 14.3)
Goa l
CE 6.2
Reduced automobile travel through the use of travel demand management strategies.
CE 6.1.4 Rideshare Vehicles
Monitor the volume and proliferation of on demand rideshare services (e.g., Uber and Lyft) and respond
with appropriate level of design guidance and regulation of curb side uses (including loading zone) and
parking lot utilization. (Imp 16.10)
CE 6.1.5 Autonomous, Connected, and Future Vehicle Technology
96
Monitor the development of new vehicle technology and associated
community-based infrastructure. For improvements demonstrated as
practical, plan for the deployment of new vehicle technology within the
existing right-of-way and infrastructure system through the annual budgeting
process and capital improvement programming process. (Imp 16.7, 30.1)
CE 6.1.6 Wayfinding Technology
Monitor and communicate with wayfinding technology providers (e.g., Waze
and Google Maps) to reduce routing of traffic through neighborhoods. (Imp
16.7)
CE 6.1.7 Parking Technology
Consider deployment of parking app technology that identifies available
parking spaces and reduces vehicle circulation and congestion related to
searching for parking spaces. (Imp 16.7)
Climate Change
Goal
CE 7.1
Promote strategies to reduce the use of internal combustion passenger cars and the attendant greenhouse
gas emissions.
Policies
CE 7.1.1 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis
Follow the analysis methodology for vehicle miles traveled according to the
Newport Beach VMT thresholds policy and as required in Senate Bill 743 and
the revised California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. (Imp
11.1)
CE 7.1.2 VMT Mitigation Measures
Require implementation of CEQA project related VMT mitigation measures
when warranted and monitor reductions in VMT from new development. (Imp
11.1)
CE 7.1.3 Regional VMT Mitigation Measures
97
Promote the development of regional VMT mitigation in order to simplify the
CEQA process and enhance the effectiveness of VMT and GHG reduction
strategies. (Imp 14.4)
CE 6.2.1 7.1.4 Alternative Transportation Modes and Practices
Promote and encourage the use of alternative transportation modes, such as
ridesharing, carpools, vanpools, public transit, bicycles, and walking; and
provide facilities that support such alternate modes.walking, and
telecommuting programs, through the planning and development of a
Complete Streets master plan and design guide. (Imp 16.8, 16.11)
CE 6.2.2 7.1.5 Support Facilities for Alternative Modes
Require new development projects to provide facilities commensurate with
development type and intensity to support alternative modes, such as
preferential parking for carpools, bike racks, bike stations, bicycle lockers,
showers, commuter information areas, rideshare vehicle loading areas, water
transportation docks, and bus stop improvements. (Imp 16.8, 16.11)
CE 6.2.3 CE 7.1.6 Public Right of Way Curbside Management
Review areas with commercial uses (such as retail, restaurant, and hospitality)
to incorporate strategies to accommodate novel use of curb side right of way
to reduce passenger car use through drop-off or valet and accommodate
rideshare as well as delivery activities where appropriate. (Imp 16.10)
CE 7.1.7 Project Site Design Supporting Alternative Modes
Encourage increased use of public transportation by requiring project site
designs that facilitate the use of public transportation and walking. (Imp 16.8,
16.11)
CE 7.1.8 Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Stations
Install additional EV charging stations on City properties, support existing
private development to add new EV charging stations and develop incentives
for the installation of EV charging stations and other alternative fuels systems
as part of new development.
Parking
Goal
CE 78.1
98
An adequate supply of convenient parking throughout the City.
Policies
CE 78.1.1 Required Parking
Require that new development provide adequate, convenient parking for
residents, guests, business patrons, and visitors. (Imp 16.10)
CE 7.1.2CE 8.1.2 Parking Considerations of Rideshare Vehicles
Develop parking demand statistics that consider the efficiency of rideshare
services and the potential for reduction in parking requirements. (Imp 16.10)
CE 8.1.3 Parking In-Lieu Fees
Establish an in-lieu parking fee that the City may require to be paid when a
development is not able to provide required parking. (Imp 16.10)
CE 78.1.34 Funding of Shared Parking Facilities
Use in-lieu fees and other funds to develop public shared parking facilities in
areas with inadequate parking supply. Priority shall be given to spending fees
in areas that will benefit those who contributed the fees. (Imp 16.10)
CE 78.1.45 Expanded Parking in Corona del Mar
Permit conversion of Corona Del Mar residential lots adjacent to commercial
areas and commercial lots for parking to support commercial uses. Encourage
continued use of existing parking on residential zoned lots, as well as existing
shared parking lots. (Imp 2.1, 8.1, 8.2, 24.1)
CE 78.1.56 Parking Consolidation
Evaluate the potential to consolidate underutilized parcels to create parking
districts and to construct areawide parking hubs potentially relieving individual
parcels of some of their parking requirements. (Imp 16.10)
CE 8.1.7 Avon Street Municipal Parking Lot Relocation
Consider relocation of the Avon Street municipal lot to better serve
commercial uses in Mariners’ Mile. (Imp 2.1, 16.10)
CE 78.1.68 Public Use of Private Parking Facilities
Encourage the use of commercial, office, and institutional parking areas for
use as public parking to serve coastal recreational areas during weekends and
99
holidays, in conjunction with public transit or shuttles where appropriate. (Imp
8.1, 8.2, 16.10)
CE 78.1.79 Shared Parking Facilities
Consider allowing shared parking in mixed use and pedestrian oriented areas
throughout the City. (Imp 2.1, 8.1, 8.2, 16.10)
CE 78.1.810 Parking Configuration
Site and design new development to avoid use of parking configurations or
management programs that are difficult to maintain and enforce. (Imp 2.1, 7.1,
8.1)
CE 78.1.911 Parking Requirements for Pedestrian-Oriented and Local-Serving
Uses
Consider revised parking requirements for small scale neighborhood serving
commercial uses in areas that derive most of their trade from walk-in business,
especially where on-street or other public parking is available. (Imp 2.1, 8.1, 8.2)
CE 78.1.1012 Parking for Marine Recreational Users
Provide adequate parking as necessary in the vicinity of visitor serving marine
uses, including marinas, water transportation terminals, boat ramps, as well as
parking suitable for service vehicles in commercial marinas and berthing areas.
(Imp 16.12)
CE 78.1.1113 Curb Cuts
Require new development to minimize curb cuts to protect on-street parking
spaces. Close curb cuts to create on street parking spaces wherever feasible.
(Imp 2.1, 7.1, 8.1)
CE 78.1.1214 Alley Access
Require alley access to parking areas for all new development in areas where
alley access exists. (Imp 2.1, 8.1)
CE 78.1.1315 Up-to-Date Parking Requirements
Periodically review and update off-street parking requirements toin the
Municipal Code to account for changes in technology and commuter behavior
and ensure that new development provides off-street parking sufficient to
serve approved uses. (Imp 8.1, 8.2, 16.10)
100
Goal
CE 78.2
An efficiently operated parking system.
Policies
CE 78.2.1 Parking Management
Develop parking management programs for areas with inadequate parking.
(Imp 16.10)
CE 78.2.2 Parking Technology
Support the development of new technologies, including parking related apps
to promote wayfinding, parking availability, and parking fee collections in an
efficient manner. (Imp 16.10)
CE 8.2.3 Parking Pricing
Periodically review and update parking fees and rates at on-street locations
and off-street parking lots operated by the City. (Imp 16.10)
CE 8.2.4 Parking Signage
Provide improved parking information and signage. (Imp 16.10)
CE 78.2.35 Shared Valet Service
Explore the feasibility of shared valet parking programs in areas with high
parking demand and less conveniently located parking facilities, such as
Mariners’ Mile and McFadden Square. (Imp 16.10)
Transportation Funding
Goal
CE 89.1
Adequate funding for needed transportation infrastructure and operations including support of measures
for outside funding of transportation improvements.
Policies
CE 89.1.1 Transportation User and Benefit Fees
101
Support legislation to increase transportation user and benefit fees, and to
index such fees to keep pace with inflation, in order to provide the additional
revenues for needed transportation facilities and services. (Imp 7.3)
CE 89.1.2 State Highway Revenues
Support legislation to increase state highway revenues as needed to maintain
and rehabilitate the existing state highway system and to match all available
federal highway funding. (Imp 14.9)
CE 89.1.3 Innovative Transportation Funding
Support the evaluation and implementation of innovative transportation
financing mechanisms such as local tax increment districts, benefit assessment
districts, and joint development and use of transportation centers. (Imp 31.1)
CE 89.1.4 Local Street and Highway Revenues
Support measures to increase local street and highway revenues as needed to
fund all road reconstruction, operation, and maintenance cost. (Imp 7.3, 20.1)
CE 89.1.5 Comprehensive Funding Program
Support measures to develop and implement a continuing funding program,
including private sector participation and an equitable fare structure, to fund
the construction, operation, and maintenance of pedestrian, bicycle, and
transit facilities and services. (Imp 7.2, 7.3, 20.1)
CE 89.1.6 Annual Budgeting for Improvements
Annually review and consider budgeting for projects contributing to
completion of the Master Plan of Streets and Highways., Bicycle Master Plan,
Complete Streets Master Plan, and intelligent transportation system plans. (Imp
7.3, 30.1)
CE 89.1.7 Fair Share Fee Ordinance
Periodically review the Fair Share Fee Ordinance, reassess the unfunded cost
of required improvements, and adjust the required Fair Share Fees as
appropriate. (Imp 7.2)
CE 89.1.8 Roadway Improvements Funding
Fund costs of major roadway facility and intersection improvements through
gas tax revenues, federal, state, and county grants, and City ordinances to avoid
burdening the General Fund to the extent that this is possible. (Imp 7.2, 7.3,
30.2)
CE 89.1.9 Right-of-Way Dedication
102
Require the dedication of needed right-of-way in conjunction with approval
of subdivision maps or other discretionary approvals. (Imp 1.1)
CE 89.1.10 Development Requirements
Require development to provide the needed roadway improvements adjacent
to a site, commensurate with project impact and in accordance with the Master
Plan of Streets and Highways. (Imp 16.3)
CE 89.1.11 Joint Funding with Adjoining Jurisdictions
Pursue joint funding of improvements in areas (such as the Airport Area)
where traffic growth and/or needed improvements are demonstrably based
upon traffic contributions or improvements that are a joint responsibility of
Newport Beach and one or more adjacent jurisdictions/agencies. (Imp 14.1)
CE 89.1.12 Measure M Restrictions
Measure M sales tax revenues shall not be used to replace private developer
funding that has been committed for any project or normal subdivision
obligations. (Imp 16.2)
CE 89.1.13 Transportation Improvement or Special Assessment District
Establish a transportation improvement or special assessment district to fund
improvements needed in the Airport Area. (Imp 31.1)
103
INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE104
Attachment No. PC 3
Archived Planning Commission Staff
Reports
105
INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE106
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
September 17, 2020
Agenda Item No. 4
SUBJECT: Planning Commission Involvement with the Circulation Element
Update (PA2017-141)
PLANNER: Jim Campbell, Deputy Community Development Director
jcampbell@newportbeachca.gov
949-644-3210
SUMMARY
The City is currently processing an update to its General Plan. Initially it was to be a
comprehensive update with the entire General Plan being evaluated and updated as
necessary. However, due to an October 2021 deadline for adoption of the Housing
Element for the next eight-year planning cycle (2021-2029), the effort shifted focus to the
Housing, Land Use, and Circulation Elements. Incorporating Environmental Justice
policies is also a priority due to newer requirements of State General Plan law. The
remainder of the elements would be taken up on a delayed and parallel track or they
would be completed after the Housing Element.
In order to provide a public forum for this effort, the City Council created a ten-member
Housing Element Update Advisory Committee (HEUAC), including the Mayor as a non-
voting member. Given the centralized focus of the HEUAC on the Housing Element, the
City intends to use the Planning Commission as the deliberative body to guide the
Circulation Element update. When placed on an agenda, the meetings will serve as one
of several ways the public can participate in the discussion of community transportation
and circulation issues.
RECOMMENDATION
1)Review and provide input to staff;
2)Determine this activity is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines,
Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 because this action will not result in a physical change
to the environment, directly or indirectly; and
3)Consider the appointment, at this meeting or a future meeting, of a Planning
Commissioner to workwith Outreach Subcommittee of the Housing Element Update
Advisory Committee.
1 107
INTENTIONALLY 108
Circulation Element Update
Planning Commission, September 17, 2020
Page 2
DISCUSSION
In early 2019, the City Council initiated a comprehensive General Plan update. The City
also created a General Plan Update Steering Committee (GPUSC) to guide the effort.
Kearns & West was the consultant selected to assist the City in conducting meaningful
outreach to the community. The City conducted a community launch event in the fall of
2019, and then followed up with seven community workshops, one in each Council
district. During the process, the City received its draft Regional Housing Needs
Assessment (RHNA) allocation from the Southern California Association of Governments
SCAG). The high draft RHNA of 4,832 units immediately changed the focus of the
outreach effort toward housing. The City supports legislative changes to ease the process
and is preparing an appeal of the allocation. Despite these efforts, the City must move
ahead and plan for the RHNA allocation.
In recognition of the mandate to plan for the RHNA allocation through the Housing by the
October 2021 deadline, the City Council reduced the scope of the comprehensive update
to focus on housing, land use, circulation and environment justice policies. To that end,
the City Council appointed a Housing Element Update Advisory Committee (HEUAC) to
carry on the effort started by the GPUSC. Upon formation of the HEUAC, the GPUSC
was dissolved.
The HEUAC’s responsibility is to ensure sufficient public outreach, guide the selection of
necessary consultants and provide guidance on goals and policies related to the update
of the Housing, Land Use, Circulation Elements, and any other Elements deemed
necessary by the Committee or City Council. While the Circulation Element is within
HEUAC’s responsibility, the Committee was formed with members of the community who
have specialized and extensive knowledge of housing. In addition, given the expedited
timeline for compliance with the State’s mandated October 2021 deadline, the focus of
the HEUAC needs to be narrowed to housing issues.
Current Status
At this time, the HEUAC is focusing on identifying an adequate number of opportunity
sites for the required Housing Opportunity Sites Inventory. This inventory is of utmost
importance, as it demonstrates compliance with planning for the requisite RHNA
allocation. Four subcommittees have been formed to help identify sites, to help shape the
outreach program, and to discuss the intricacies and feasibility of affordable housing
development.
In order to facilitate an efficient parallel track for the Circulation Element update, the City
intends to use the Planning Commission (Commission) to assist and guide the update
effort. The HEUAC will create a unified approach for outreach and public engagement.
3 109
Circulation Element Update
Planning Commission, September 17, 2020
Page 3
Staff recommends the appointment of one Planning Commissioner work with the HEUAC
Outreach Subcommittee (Debbie Stevens and Susan DeSantis) to create a “bridge”
between the Committee and the Commission.
The HEUAC reviewed the attached outreach plan (Attachment PC 1) at their September
2, 2020, meeting. There will be more detail added to the plan as implementation occurs.
The Commission will be tasked with discussing and guiding policy changes related to
transportation, circulation, andmobility within a public forum, after reviewing the feedback
from the community through outreach effort. Kearns & West and City staff will facilitate
the community outreach with oversight from the HEUAC. The hope is that we can reach
broad segments of the community and solicit meaningful feedback on mobility needs.
Circulation Element Overview and Update
As put best by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR), “the circulation
element is not simply a transportation plan, but rather a strategy addressing infrastructure
needs for the circulation of people, goods, energy, water, sewage, storm drainage, and
communications.” State law requires the circulation element to correlate with the land use
element hence the Planning Commission is an appropriate body to guide the update.
The City’s Circulation Element was last updated in 2006. Much has changed since then
not only with state law, but with mobility in general. By way of example, there is an
emerging use of alternative transportation solutions such as carshare, rideshare, and
bikeshare services, as well as increasing planning for future autonomous vehicles.
On the legislative front, the City must prepare updates to comply with the Complete
Streets Act, which helps to ensure circulation systems are all-inclusive and thoughtfully
planned for all modes of transit. Other considerations for the update include the Global
Warming Solutions Act (AB 32), SB 32, and the Sustainable Community and Climate
Protection Act (SB 375) with completion of Sustainable Communities Strategies, CEQA
streamlining for infill projects (SB 226), and the shift in CEQA transportation metric away
from level-of-service (LOS) to vehicle-miles-traveled ( VMT) (SB 743). As part of the
Circulation Element, the City Master Plan of Streets and Highways will be reviewed for
consistency with the County Master Plan of Arterial Highways.
As the City moves towards the update, the Commission will help guide the discussion
and deliberate with the community on what goals and polices should or should not be
included. The work of the HEUAC will help to shape the outreach plan that supplements
the work at future Planning Commission meetings.
The City has retained a consultant team consisting of Kimley-Horn & Associates, LSA,
and Urban Crossroads to prepare the Circulation Element update. They will also be
involved in the traffic and transportation analysis prepared for an environmental impact
report (EIR) for the entire update. Anthony Petros, a Principal and transportation planner
with LSA and Tony Brine, City Traffic Engineer, will be the Circulation Element project
4 110
Circulation Element Update
Planning Commission, September 17, 2020
Page 4
managers but will remain in close coordination with Community Development staff. Mr.
Petros has prepared a draft “white paper” that provides an outline of possible topics and
issues for inclusion in an updated Circulation Element (Attachment PC 2). The document
is a draft and it does not limit the issues that might be examined within the update. The
City intends to hold a series of virtual workshops and surveys over the next few months
to collect information to guide the update.
Environmental Review
No action is required by the Planning Commission regarding this agenda item and as a
result, it is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to
Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable
indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project
as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations,
Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change
to the environment, directly or indirectly.
The Cityhas contracted with Kimley-Horn to prepare an EIR in accordance with the CEQA
for the focused update of the Housing, Land Use, Circulation Elements including
environmental justice policies.
Public Notice
The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of
the meeting at which the Planning Commission considers the item). Additionally, staff
sent an email alert to those individuals who have signed up for the service.
Prepared and Submitted by:
ATTACHMENTS
PC 1 Outreach Plan
PC 2 Draft Circulation Element Update Issues White Paper
PC 3 Correspondence
5 111
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
October 22, 2020
Agenda Item No. 8
SUBJECT: Appointment of a Commissioner for Circulation Element Update
Outreach Effort (PA2017-141)
PLANNER: Jim Campbell, Deputy Community Development Director
jcampbell@newportbeachca.gov
949-644-3210
SUMMARY
On October 13, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-93 (Attachment PC
1), removing the Circulation Element Update from the Housing Element Update Advisory
Committee's (HEUAC) responsibilities. The Circulation Element update will now be
directed by the Planning Commission (“Commission”). The intent is to have the
Commission provide strategic guidance and a forum for public participation as part of a
broader outreach effort with the Community. To date, the public outreach effort has only
been guided by the HEUAC. Staff recommends appointing a Planning Commissioner to
work with the HEUAC outreach subcommittee to facilitate the public outreach process.
RECOMMENDATION
1.Determine this activity is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, Title 14,
Division 6, Chapter 3 because this action will not result in a physical change to the
environment, directly or indirectly; and
2.Appoint Commissioner Peter Koetting to work with the Outreach Subcommittee of the
Housing Element Update Advisory Committee.
DISCUSSION
The Circulation Elementupdate has begun, andstaff has only beenplanning theoutreach
effort with the HEUAC guidance. No work on the policies has occurred and that will only
take place after input from the community later this Fall and Winter 2020. Attachment PC
2 provides a snapshot of the current plan. It is important to note that the plan will be
updated and modified periodically to facilitate implementation and input from HEUAC and
the Commission.
1 112
Appointment of a Commissioner for Circulation Element Update Outreach
Planning Commission, October 22, 2020
Page 2
Next month, two events have been scheduled. First, a study sessionwith the Commission
will be conducted on Thursday, November 19, 2020, during the Commission’s regular
meeting. The study session will focus on familiarizing the Commission with the Circulation
Element and to discuss the vocabulary and basic underpinning concepts to help establish
a fundamental base understanding to facilitate future discussions. Notice to the public will
be provided and therewill be an opportunity for public comments. Second, a similarvirtual
public workshop will be conducted on Monday, November 23, 2020. The virtual public
workshop will have a similar focus to educate community members with interactive
components where participants can respond to questions and give feedback on
transportation issues.
The recommended action, and the work that will follow, will lead to refinement of the
outreach effort. The expectation is to have Commissioner Koetting report progress to the
Commission at future meetings when necessary. Staff intends to place a discussion item
on future Commission agendas for Circulation Element update to ensure a transparent
process and continuous public input.
Environmental Review
Action on this item is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably
foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is
not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of
Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in
physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly.
Public Notice
The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of
the meeting at which the Planning Commission considers the item). Additionally, staff
sent an email alert to those individuals who have signed up for the service.
Prepared and Submitted by:
ATTACHMENTS
PC 1 City Council Resolution No. 2020-93
PC 2 DRAFT Circulation Element Community Engagement Phase I Activity Outline
2 113
Attachment PC 1
Resolution No. 2020-93
3 114
INTENTIONALLY 115
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-93
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE
PURPOSE & RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE HOUSING
ELEMENT UPDATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE RELATED
TO THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL
PLAN AND DELEGATING THOSE RESPONSIBILITIES
TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
WHEREAS, on January 14, 2020, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach
City") adopted Resolution No. 2020-6 creating the Housing Element Update Advisory
Committee ("HEUAC"), to serve as a forum for public participation, to guide a focused
update of the Housing, Land Use and Circulation Elements of the City of Newport Beach
General Plan ("General Plan"), and to build upon the progress already established by the
General Plan Update Steering Committee;
WHEREAS, the HEUAC's purpose and responsibilities include ensuring sufficient
public outreach and stakeholder input regarding the update to the Housing, Land Use,
and Circulation Elements of the General Plan; reviewing responses to Requests for
Proposal and recommending to the City Council the selection of consultants to update
the Housing, Land Use, and Circulation Elements; guiding City staff and the consultant
through the public outreach process in updating the Housing, Land Use, and Circulation
Elements; and making other recommendations to the City Council regarding the update
of the General Plan, as necessary;
WHEREAS, the Committee has been meeting since July 2020 and received
regular updates from City staff regarding the City's Regional Housing Needs Assessment
RHNA") allocation from the Southern California Association of Governments ("SCAG")
of 4,834 new units for the Sixth Cycle Housing Element covering the period October 2021
through October 2029 ("Sixth Cycle Housing Element");
WHEREAS, several changes in State Housing Law have made it more challenging
to find appropriate sites to meet the City's RHNA allocation for the Sixth Cycle Housing
Element;
WHEREAS, revising the Purpose and Responsibilities to allow the HEUAC to
focus on the Housing and Land Use Elements of the General Plan is appropriate given
the October 2021 deadline to adopt the Sixth Cycle Housing Element;
5 116
Resolution No. 2020-93
Page 2of3
WHEREAS, the City's Planning Commission routinely reviews development
projects, which often involve a consideration of traffic and circulation matters, including
traffic studies pursuant to Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance) of the Newport
Beach Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, Section 707 of the Charter of the City of Newport Beach vests the
power to make recommendations to the City Council on the adoption, amendment or
repeal of a General Plan, or any part thereof, for the physical development of the City with
the Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach resolves as
follows:
Section 1: The City Council hereby amends the Description of the Housing
Element Update Advisory Committee, attached hereto and incorporated by reference as
Attachment 1, to remove proposed revisions to the Circulation Element of the General
Plan from the Purpose and Responsibility of the HEUAC and hereby delegates those
duties to the Planning Commission.
Section 2: The City Council hereby repeals Resolution No. 2020-21.
Section 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this
resolution is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not
affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this resolution. The City
Council hereby declares that it would have passed this resolution, and each section,
subsection, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or
more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid or
unconstitutional.
Section 4: The recitals provided in this resolution are true and correct and are
incorporated into the operative part of this resolution.
Section 5: The City Council finds the adoption of this resolution is not subject to
the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the
activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the
environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378)
of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3,
because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or
indirectly.
6 117
Resolution No. 2020-93
Page 3 of 3
Section 6: This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the
City Council, and the City Clerk shall certify the vote adopting the resolution.
ADOPTED this 13th day of October, 2020.
ATTEST:
Leilani I. [Trown
City Clerk 1
Will O'Neill
Mayor
1-1FoR_!/'
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
01-0 l _ k ewl '
Aaron`C. Harp
City Attorney
Attachment 1: Description of the Housing Element Update Advisory Committee
7 118
ATTACHMENT 1
Housing Element Update Advisory Committee
AUTHORIZATION: Established by Resolution No. 2020-6 adopted on January 14,
2020, amended by Resolution No. 2020-21 on February 25,
2020 and Resolution No. 2020-_ on October 13, 2020.
MEMBERSHIP: Ten (10) total. The Mayor, or a City Council Member
designated by the Mayor, shall be an ex officio member
without the right to vote. Nine (9) residents of the City of
Newport Beach ("City") appointed by the Mayor and
confirmed by the City Council.
MEMBERSHIP
TERM: The person elected as Mayor, or the City Council Member
designated by the Mayor, shall be a member of the Housing
Element Update Advisory Committee ("Committee"). The
term of the appointed members of the Committee shall be
indefinite pending City Council action, or expiration of the
Committee.
MEETINGS: Meetings shall be held as required by the business needs of
the Committee in such locations, dates and times as allowed
by the Ralph M. Brown Act.
QUALIFICATIONS
OF APPOINTED
MEMBERS: Appointed Committee Members shall meet the following
qualifications:
A. One (1) member with experience in the development
of affordable housing and/or senior housing;
B. One (1) member with knowledge and experience in the
application of the California Environmental Quality Act and
other related environmental laws;
C. One (1) member with architectural and/ or land use
and planning knowledge and experience;
D. One (1) member with knowledge and experience in
stakeholder outreach for the purpose of engaging individuals
1
8 119
and/or organizations within the City in the Housing Element
Update process;
E. One (1) member with knowledge and experience in
real estate financing;
F. One (1) member with knowledge and experience
financing unique housing projects other than affordable
and/or senior housing projects;
G. One (1) member with a legal background; and
H. One (1) chairperson highly experienced in leading
public meetings.
The Committee Chairperson and a Vice Chairperson shall be
appointed by the Mayor.
SELECTION
OF APPOINTED
MEMBERS: Selection of Committee Members shall be done as follows:
A. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice letting members
of the public know of the opportunity to serve on the
Committee and the application process. The notice
shall include, but not be limited to, details regarding
what information is necessary to be considered for
appointment, where to submit an application, and the
application deadline.
B. The application notice shall be published at least once
in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and
posted in the City's normal posting location for
agendas, as well as the Newport Beach Public Library
located at 1000 Avocado Avenue.
C. The deadline to submit applications for the Committee
shall be one (1) week after the application notice is
published in a newspaper of general circulation in the
City.
PAI9 120
D. The Mayor shall form an ad-hoc Appointments
Committee, which shall be comprised of the Mayor
and two (2) Council Members to review the
applications, the applicants' answers to any questions,
and to conduct any necessary interviews.
E. In conducting their review of applications and
interviews with the individual applicants, if any, the
ad-hoc Appointments Committee shall attempt to
determine if there exists a potential conflict of interest,
which might interfere with the performance of the.
applicant's duties in an impartial manner free from
bias.
F. After the applications have been reviewed and any
necessary interviews conducted, the two (2) Council
Members on the ad-hoc Appointment Committee shall
make a recommendation to the Mayor regarding who
should be appointed to the Committee. In making a
recommendation to the Mayor, the two (2) Council
Members on the ad-hoc Appointment Committee shall
endeavor to avoid recommending appointments of
applicants with a substantial conflict of interest, which
would require repeated disqualification from voting
on issues that are likely to come before the Committee.
G. The Mayor shall consider the recommendation of the
two (2) Council Members on the ad-hoc Appointment
Committee and, after consideration of the
recommendation, decide, in the Mayor's discretion,
whom should be appointed to the Committee.
H. The Mayor shall inform the City Clerk of the names of
the members to be appointed to the Committee and the
City Clerk will submit the names of the appointees to
the City Council, at an open and noticed meeting, to be
considered for confirmation by the City Council.
310 121
I. Except as otherwise required by law, the process for
selecting, appointing and confirming members to the
Committee shall follow the process set forth herein.
PURPOSE &
RESPONSIBILITIES: A. Ensure there is sufficient public outreach and
stakeholder input regarding the update to the Housing
and Land Use Elements of the City of Newport Beach
General Plan and any other Elements deemed
necessary;
B. Review responses to the Request for Proposal for
services to update the Housing, Land Use, and other
Elements deemed necessary;
C. Make a recommendation to the City Council regarding
the selection of consultants to assist in the update of the
Housing, Land Use, and other Elements deemed
necessary;
D. Provide guidance to City staff and the consultant
through the outreach process;
E. Provide guidance to City staff, and the consultant, on
goals and policies related to the update of the Housing,
Land Use, and any other Elements deemed necessary
by the Committee or City Council; and
F. Make other recommendations to the City Council
regarding the update of the General Plan, as necessary.
COMMITTEE
EXPIRATION: The Committee shall expire and sunset without further action
upon completion and submittal of a certifiable Housing
Element to the California Department of Housing and
Community Development.
History
Adopted January 14, 2020 - Resolution No. 2020-6
Amended February 25, 2020 - Resolution No. 2020-21
Amended October 13, 2020 - Resolution No. 2020-93
12
11 122
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF ORANGE } ss.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH }
I, Leilani I. Brown, City Clerk of the City of Newport Beach, California, do hereby certify that the
whole number of members of the City Council is seven; the foregoing resolution, being Resolution
No. 2020-93, was duly introduced before and adopted by the City Council of said City at a regular
meeting of said Council held on the 13th day of October, 2020; and the same was so passed and adopted
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Mayor Will O'Neill, Mayor Pro Tem Brad Avery, Council Member Joy Brenner, Council
Member Diane Dixon, Council Member Duffy Duffield, Council Member Jeff Herdman,
Council Member Kevin Muldoon
NAYS: None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the official seal of
said City this 14th day of October, 2020.
ialV c
Leilani I. Brown
City Clerk
Newport Beach, California
1--
U
N .P0RNi
12 123
Attachment PC 2
DRAFT Circulation Element Community Engagement
Phase I Activity Outline
13 124
INTENTIONALLY 125
DRAFT Circulation Element Community Engagement
PHASE I ACTIVITY OUTLINE
The following is updated from the Circulation Element Community Engagement Outreach Component table and is meant to provide a
focused look at Phase I activities. This phase consists of the following components, designed to work together to inform and engage
the community. It is important to note that, although many in the Newport Beach Community are already highly informed and
involved, this approach will help to engage community members who may not be as active or who may not generally participate in
the process.
Introductory Webinar
This activity will orient the community to the Circulation Element update outreach process and topics. It will help the broader
community understand what components are contained in a General Plan Circulation Element, and will provide information on when,
where, and how community members can get more information and provide feedback on the Newport Beach Circulation Element
update.
Learning Modules
A set of two informative and creative 3-minute videos will provide the community with a high-level overview of Circulation Elements
components of the currentNewport Beach General Plan. These videos are primarily meant to inform and will bepaired with an activity
on the Newport Together website, allowing for community members to provide high-level input or ask clarifying questions.
Vision Workshop
A 2-hour virtual visioning workshop will allow for discussion of the Circulation Element components outlined in the Learning Module
videos and will help the City to seek understanding of the Community’s vision for an updated Circulation Element.
Planning Commission Study Session – Creating the Vision
Phase I of outreach will conclude with a PlanningCommission Study Session. This interactive session will bring together concepts from
the previous activities in a collaborative environment where the participants see how their input is guiding policy development and
can have the opportunity to provide further guidance
15 126
Phase I Outline
The table below outlines Phase I activities, and indicates date, format, length, purpose and topics for each activity.
Phase I
November 2020 December 2020 January
2020
Title Planning
Commission Meeting
Introductory
Webinar
The Current General
Plan:
Learning Module 1a
The Current General
Plan: Learning
Module 1b
A Vision for
Newport Beach
Creating
the Vision
Date November 16 November 23 December 4 December 8 December 15 Mid-Late
January
Format Presentation to
Planning Commission
Virtual Workshop
Recorded and
streamed on
NBTV
Video
Posted on Newport
Together Website
Video
Posted on Newport
Together Website
Virtual
Workshop
Recorded and
streamed on
NBTV
Planning
Commissio
n Study
Session
Length 1 hour 1 hour 3 Minutes 3 minutes 2 Hours
Purpose
Provide introduction
to the Planning
Commission
Provide basic
knowledge and
solicit feedback
Provide backdrop
and historical
perspective on aset
of current
Circulation Element
Components and
solicit feedback
Provide backdrop and
historical perspective
on a set of current
Circulation Element
Components and
solicit feedback
Facilitate a
discussion with
the community
members about
a vision for
Newport Beach
Circulation,
answer
questions about
current
Circulation
Element
components,
and solicit
feedback.
Solicit
feedback
from the
communit
y.
Topics
Outline the
process and
schedule
Outline the
process and
schedule
Review of current
General Plan
elements:
Review of current
General Plan
elements:
Complete
Streets
Addressing
State
16 127
Phase I
November 2020 December 2020 January
2020
Title Planning
Commission Meeting
Introductory
Webinar
The Current General
Plan:
Learning Module 1a
The Current General
Plan: Learning
Module 1b
A Vision for
Newport Beach
Creating
the Vision
Introduce
terminology and
definitions (e.g.,
Complete
Streets, Active
Transportation,
VMT and LOS,
Emerging
Technologies)
Introduce
terminology
and
definitions
e.g.,
Complete
Streets, Active
Transportatio
n, VMT and
LOS, Emerging
Technologies)
Parking
Mobility
Roadway
System
Regional
Transportation
Network
Traffic
Management
Public
Transportation
Alternative
Transportation
Transportation
Funding
mandates
VMT v. LOS,
Accessibility
v.
Congestion,
Climate
Change and
Mobility,
Transportati
on Funding)
Leaving
Room for the
Future (On
Demand
mobility,
Autonomous
vehicles,
future
transit)
Input
Opportunities
Feedback from the
Planning
Commission
Live polling and
opportunities for
Q&A
Input activities
available on
www.newporttoget
her.com
Input activities
available on
www.newporttogethe
r.com
Live polling and
opportunities for
Q&A
Public
comment
and
interactive
activities
17 128
October 20, 2020 1
CIRCULATION ELEMENT UPDATE 101
NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
NOVEMBER 19, 2020
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2 - Draft Presentation
Circulation Element Update Status Report
1129
Presentation Outline
1.Welcome and Introductions
2.Existing Circulation Element Outline
3.Definitions -Terminology
4.Existing Circulation Element Themes
5.Coordination with other Agencies
6.Update Process - Outreach
7.Question & Answer
November 19, 2020 2
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2 - Draft Presentation
Circulation Element Update Status Report
2130
Presentation Goals
PROVIDE AN INTRODUCTION TO THE COMMUNITY ABOUT THE
CIRCULATION ELEMENT:
Why the city is updating the Circulation Element
Introduction to the Circulation Element and key themes
PROVIDE INFORMATION ON ADDITIONAL OPPORTUNITIES FOR
CONTINUED ENGAGEMENT
November 19, 2020 3
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2 - Draft Presentation
Circulation Element Update Status Report
3131
Existing Circulation
Element
4November19, 2020
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2 - Draft Presentation
Circulation Element Update Status Report
4132
Goal: A safe and convenient transportation system
Governs the long-term mobility system of the City.
Closely correlated with the Land Use Element
To provide best possible balance between land
development, roadway size, traffic service levels and
community character.
Community Setting
Addresses circulation based on city geography with bay &
harbor. Regional traffic and summer traffic are discussed.
Existing Circulation
Element
November 19, 2020 5
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2 - Draft Presentation
Circulation Element Update Status Report
5133
ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY (OCTA)
Regional agency that oversees regional
transportation system and Master Plan of
Arterial Highways.
LEVEL-OF-SERVICE (LOS)
Measure of traffic congestion. Represents
operating conditions at intersection. LOS = A
is free flow. LOS = E is above capacity,
breakdown flow.
Definitions –Key
Terminology
October 20, 2020 6
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2 - Draft Presentation
Circulation Element Update Status Report
6134
November 19, 2020 7
VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT)
New metric for measuring traffic impacts with
land development.
COMPLETE STREET
Allows for safe travel by those walking,
cycling, driving automobiles, riding public
transportation, or delivering goods.
Definitions –Key
Terminology
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2 - Draft Presentation
Circulation Element Update Status Report
7135
Key Themes from
Existing Circulation
Element
8November19, 2020
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2 - Draft Presentation
Circulation Element Update Status Report
8136
November 19, 2020 9
Key Themes from Existing
Circulation Element
MOBILITY –Diverse transportation system reflecting city character
and supporting land use plan.
ROADWAY SYSTEM –Safe roadways providing efficient movement
of goods.
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION –Provide consistency with regional
roadway planning.
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION –Provide/accommodate transit =
Buses, Shuttles as alternative travel mode.
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2 - Draft Presentation
Circulation Element Update Status Report
9137
November 19, 2020 10
Key Themes from Existing
Circulation Element
ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION MODES –Bicycles, equestrian,
pedestrian, water transportation
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT –Traffic signal
coordination
PARKING –Provide adequate parking, shared parking
TRANSPORTATION FUNDING –Gas tax, Fair Share Fees, Measure
M/ OC Go
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2 - Draft Presentation
Circulation Element Update Status Report
10138
11
Master Plan of Streets and Highways
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2 - Draft Presentation
Circulation Element Update Status Report
11139
12
Coast Highway –Primary Road
November 19, 2020
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2 - Draft Presentation
Circulation Element Update Status Report
12140
13
Jamboree –Major Road
November 19, 2020
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2 - Draft Presentation
Circulation Element Update Status Report
13141
14
MacArthur –Eight Lane Road
November 19, 2020
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2 - Draft Presentation
Circulation Element Update Status Report
14142
November 19, 2020 15
Incorporate Bicycle Master
Plan into the Circulation
Element.
2014 Bicycle
Master Plan
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2 - Draft Presentation
Circulation Element Update Status Report
15143
16
Bikeways Master Plan
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2 - Draft Presentation
Circulation Element Update Status Report
16144
November 19, 2020 17
Coordination with other Agencies
ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (OCTA)
Regarding consistency with the County Master Plan of Arterial Highways,
Measure M funding for roadway improvements, and transit improvements.
CALTRANS
State Agency responsible for freeways, regional facilities. State owns,
operates and maintains Coast Highway south of Newport Coast Drive, and
between Jamboree -Santa Ana River.
ADJACENT JURISDICTIONS
As an example, coordinate signal operations with Irvine and Costa Mesa.
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2 - Draft Presentation
Circulation Element Update Status Report
17145
Engaging Stakeholders
and the Community
18November19, 2020
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2 - Draft Presentation
Circulation Element Update Status Report
18146
November 19, 2020 19
Continuing Community Dialogue
INTRODUCTORY PUBLIC WORKSHOP –November 23, 2020
SERIES OF PUBLIC WORKSHOPS –
Existing Circulation Element Themes: Mobility, Roadway System,
Alternative Transportation Modes, Public Transportation, Transportation Systems
Management, Regional Transportation, others?
Workshop Discussions
Discuss existing circulation element themes in more detail and hear feedback
from the community. – (December 15, 16)
Discuss vision and hear feedback for Newport Beach Circulation Element–
complete streets, accessibility, climate change, autonomous vehicles, etc.
January 13)
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING –January 21, 2021
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2 - Draft Presentation
Circulation Element Update Status Report
19147
October 20, 2020 20
Focused General Plan Engagement Opportunities
November 19, 2020
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2 - Draft Presentation
Circulation Element Update Status Report
20148
Discussion
21November19, 2020
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2 - Draft Presentation
Circulation Element Update Status Report
21149
www.NewportTogether.com
November 19, 2020 22
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2 - Draft Presentation
Circulation Element Update Status Report
22150
Contact
TONY BRINE, City Traffic Engineer
P: 949-644-3329
tbrine@newportbeachca.gov
Benjamin Zdeba, Senior Planner
P: 949-644-3253
bzdeba@newportbeachca.gov
www.NewportTogether.com
November 19, 2020 23
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2 - Draft Presentation
Circulation Element Update Status Report
23151
24November19, 2020
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2 - Draft Presentation
Circulation Element Update Status Report
24152
Nov. 18, 2020
RE: Agenda Item 2 Circulation Element Update
Dear Planning Commissioners,
I’m so excited about the circulation
element update. After I heard the
presentation to the General Plan
Update committee last year, I started
paying attention to this subject. I find
it fascinating. Traffic/circulation is
interconnected with just about
everything else. This picture from
Driving Down Emissions covers some
of the related issues, but not all, such
as air quality.
I was asked by the American Lung
Association to add a comment:
In addition to the air quality and
climate change benefits of reducing
vehicle emissions, there are a wide
range of public health benefits
associated with investing in the
infrastructure to allow for healthier,
active transportation choices like
walking and biking. See the last
paragraph on p. 31/top of p.32 of
California Air Resources Board’s
Mobile Resource Strategy for a
broader description of health
benefits.”
In addition, I hope you would consider the possibility of a car-free outdoor dining/entertainment area,
similar to the Promenade on Forest in Laguna Beach. For over a decade, it was a heated debate there.
Thanks to COVID, the stores on Forest were willing to give up the parking spots for a while. The
Promenade has been so popular, the City considers keeping it permanently. Some other cities have a
similar experience. I hope Newport Beach could also find such a spot to help the local businesses.
I look forward to hearing the presentation and discussions tomorrow. Thanks!
Hoiyin Ip
Planning Commission - November 19, 2020
Item No. 2a Additional Materials Received
Circulation Element Update Status Report
153
Housing/Circulation
ElementUpdatesUPCOMINGCOMMUNITYENGAGEMENTOPPORTUNITIES
JOIN US IN SHAPING THE FUTURE OF NEWPORT BEACH
December 2, 2020 - Housing Element Update Advisory Committee
December 3, 2020 - Planning Commission ng/ Status Report
December 15, 2020 - Circulation Element Themes Workshop - Part 1
December 16, 2020 - Circulation Element Themes Workshop - Part 2
December 17, 2020 - Planning Commission Meeting
January 13, 2021 - Circulation Vision Workshop
January 21, 2021 - Planning Commission
February/March 2021 - Housing Element Alternatives Workshop
Share your insights on NewportTogether.com
To learn more, participate online, and register for workshops visit: www.NewportTogether.com.
Anyone can get information and submit feedback even if you can’t participate in these opportunities!
Planning Commission - December 3, 2020
Item No. 2 Circulation Element Update Status Report
154
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT January 21, 2021 Agenda Item No. 2
SUBJECT: General Plan Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141) SITE LOCATION: Citywide
APPLICANT: City of Newport Beach PLANNER: Jim Campbell, Deputy Community Development Director jcampbell@newportbeachca.gov, (949) 644-3210
PROJECT SUMMARY
A brief status report on the update of the General Plan Circulation Element.
DISCUSSION
On November 23, 2020, the City conducted a virtual workshop as an introductory “Circulation Element 101” educational session. The workshop had two objectives. The first was to introduce the existing Circulation Element of the General Plan Update, focusing on key themes and the reason for the update. The second objective was to provide information on additional opportunities for continued community engagement throughout the update process. A number of participants noted an interest in regional transportation coordination, bicyclist and pedestrian safety, emerging technology and newer modes of mobility such as rideshare services and autonomous vehicles.
On December 15 and 16, 2020, the City conducted two separate virtual workshops focusing on three objectives. The first objective was to provide a more detailed discussion of the goals and policies of each theme of the current General Plan Circulation Element. Those themes are: Mobility, Roadway System, Regional
Transportation, Public Transportation, Alternative Transportation Modes, Transportation
Systems Management/Travel Demand Management, Parking, and Transportation
Funding. The second objective was to seek input from the community on these current themes, goals, and policies and how they can better be addressed in the update. Both sessions also included time to identify any missing topics of interest. The third and final objective was to provide information on additional opportunities for continued community engagement throughout the update process. Participants took interest in several topics including the inclusion of pathways through a community to create livable neighborhoods for pedestrians and bicyclists and knowing how technology will impact transportation needs.
On January 27, 2021, the City will conduct a third virtual visioning workshop focusing on a future vision of community mobility. The session will begin by focusing on what has
155
been heard so far, and a presentation of possible update ideas from the consultant and staff. Participants will then be encouraged to provide their own thoughts for future change that might be incorporated in modified or new goals and policies.
On February 4, 2021, staff will again provide a brief status report to the Planning Commission.
The City’s traffic and transportation consultant will be preparing the initial discussion draft of the update in February. Once the initial draft is available, staff and the consultants will schedule and conduct an outreach effort with the community and the Planning Commission to receive feedback and guidance. Once that outreach effort is completed, the draft would be further refined during the Summer in preparation for the public hearing process leading up to adoption in the Fall.
This is a discussion item and no action will be taken and as a result, it is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the City Council considers the item) and it was posted at City Hall and on the City website.
Prepared and submitted by:
156
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT February 18, 2021 Agenda Item No. 2
SUBJECT: General Plan Circulation Element (PA2017-141) SITE LOCATION: Citywide
APPLICANT: City of Newport Beach PLANNER: Jim Campbell, Deputy Community Development Director jcampbell@newportbeachca.gov, (949) 644-3210
PROJECT SUMMARY
A brief status report on the update of the General Plan Circulation Element.
DISCUSSION
Since the last status report provided on January 21, 2021, City staff and consultants conducted a third virtual workshop focusing on weaving community feedback into a vision that will guide the future of mobility in Newport Beach.
The February 10, 2021, workshop was attended by approximately 30 people and it focused on presenting areas of little to no policy change and areas for planned policy change. At many points throughout the workshop, Community members were encouraged to join the discussion and present what is important to capture in the update.
To get the conversation started, City staff discussed the importance of maintaining consistency with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Master Plan of Arterial Highways, as well as the process to amend it. The concept of “complete streets” and what that means for the community was also discussed, including a potential refresh of the 2014 Bicycle Master Plan.
Additional topics of discussion were encouraging alternative transportation, such as bicycles and the enhancement of public transit (i.e., shuttles) to connect the various villages and neighborhoods. The community also took an interest in enhanced parking management through emerging technologies and improved curbside management for rideshare and valet services to help protect residential neighborhoods from excess commercial parking intrusion. Ideas for change included encouraging dedicated spaces for rideshare services, such as Uber and Lyft, and introducing new technologies to better manage existing parking lots.
157
INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE158
The entire session was recorded and can be accessed at www.newporttogether.com. Once prepared, a summary of the community discussion and the takeaways will be posted online at the same location. If any community member missed the workshop and would like to participate, a similar interactive opportunity for input is available at https://www.newporttogether.com/circulation-element-themes1. The City’s traffic and transportation consultant (LSA) is now working to prepare the initial draft update for discussion based on all community input received. Staff intends to present the initial draft to the Planning Commission during a study session tentatively scheduled for the March 18, 2021. A public workshop will also be scheduled for early April to solicit additional feedback from the community. Environmental Review This is a discussion item and no action will be taken and as a result, it is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Public Notice
The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the City Council considers the item) and it was posted at City Hall and on the City website.
Prepared and submitted by:
159
From:Hoiyin Ip
To:Planning Commissioners
Cc:Blom, Noah
Subject:Agenda Item VII.2 Circulation Element
Date:Wednesday, February 17, 2021 9:12:26 PM
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
content is safe.
The 2/10 circulation element workshop was another very interesting one. I always wish more people
knew (or were interested in) these workshops. About 30 people attended, at least 10 of them were
City people and consultants.
It was interesting to hear that Complete Streets is not likely for every street. I can see that. Then,
there's Slow Streets. Here is a PowerPoint from Oakland. It is a carefully designed effort to reduce
accidents and fatalities, and it happened to coincide with the pandemic.
https://cao-94612.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/Oakland-Slow-Streets-Interim-Findings-
Report.pdf
I think such projects are likely to invite more people to shift to bicycling for their shorter
trips. Studies are showing that a high proportion of auto trips are for distances under 3 miles.
Also, Slow Streets seem to invite interactions in the neighborhood, and may be good for local
shops/restaurants.
Thanks!
Hoiyin
160
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT March 4, 2021 Agenda Item No. 2
SUBJECT: General Plan Circulation Element (PA2017-141) SITE LOCATION: Citywide
APPLICANT: City of Newport Beach PLANNER: Jim Campbell, Deputy Community Development Director jcampbell@newportbeachca.gov, (949) 644-3210
PROJECT SUMMARY
A brief status report on the update of the General Plan Circulation Element.
DISCUSSION
Since the last status report provided on February 18, 2021, City staff and consultants have continued to work on taking the community feedback received at the three virtual public workshops and are drafting a refreshed Circulation Element for consideration. Staff intends to present this initial draft to the Planning Commission during a study session tentatively scheduled for March 18, 2021.
A public workshop will also be scheduled for early April as another opportunity to present the draft and to solicit additional feedback from the community.
As a reminder, all workshop sessions are recorded and can be accessed at www.newporttogether.com. Once prepared, a summary of the community discussion and the takeaways will be posted online at the same location. If any community member missed the workshop and would like to participate, similar interactive opportunities for input are available. Moving forward, workshop recordings will also be streamed on Newport Beach Television (NBTV).
Environmental Review
This is a discussion item and no action will be taken and as a result, it is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Public Notice
The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the City Council considers the item) and it was posted at City Hall and on the City website.
161
INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE162
Prepared and submitted by:
163
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT March 18, 2021 Agenda Item No. 4
SUBJECT: Initial Draft of the General Plan Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141) SITE LOCATION: Citywide APPLICANT: City of Newport Beach ENGINEER: Tony Brine, City Traffic Engineer
tbrine@newportbeachca.gov, 949-644-3329 PROJECT SUMMARY A Study Session presentation and discussion of the Initial Draft of the General Plan Circulation Element Update. RECOMMENDATION Review and provide input and direction to staff. DISCUSSION
Introduction The City’s Circulation Element was last updated in 2006. It is now being updated in conjunction with the 6th Cycle Housing Element addressing the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation of 4,845 new units. The updated Circulation Element must respond to State mandates that have come into effect since the last update. The Complete Streets Act of 2008 requires cities to plan for a balanced, multimodal transportation network that meets the needs of all users of streets, roads, and highways for safe and convenient travel. Senate Bill 743 (Chapter 386, Statues 2013) requires Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as the metric for determining transportation impacts in CEQA analysis. Additionally, emerging technologies such as autonomous and connected vehicles, and the increased use of electric vehicles, and ridesharing platforms require new policies be considered to effectively plan for the future of transportation in our community. Background The City contracted with LSA Associates and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to develop the updated Circulation Element. On September 17, 2020, a presentation was
164
INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE165
made to the Planning Commission outlining the plans for outreach with the community during the development of the Circulation Element update. As part of the Staff Report on September 17, 2020, an “Issues White Paper” was provided, which covered topics that could be included in the update. On October 13, 2020, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2020-93 delegating the duties to the Planning Commission to oversee the update process and to provide strategic guidance and a public forum for discussion of the update. Subsequently, Commissioner Koetting was appointed to work with the Outreach Subcommittee of the Housing Element Update Advisory Committee that assisted staff with the outreach process. On November 19, 2020, staff presented to the Planning Commission an Introduction to the Circulation Element. Staff outlined the key terminology and discussed the eight (8) existing Themes which are a part of the 2006 Circulation Element. Additionally, the Master Plan of Streets and Highways and the Bicycle Master Plan were covered. To conclude the presentation, staff outlined the plan for a series of Public Workshops and outreach during the fall of 2020 and early 2021.
Community Outreach and Engagement To date, the public outreach process has included four (4) virtual workshops. The first virtual Public Workshop was held on November 23, 2020. The workshop was an introductory “Circulation Element 101” session. The workshop provided an opportunity for staff to introduce the existing 2006 Circulation Element, and also to engage with the residents and begin receiving comments and feedback. There was an attendance of 45 participants. The public showed an interest in bicycle and pedestrian safety, emerging transportation modes, the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis, telecommuting effects, and coordination with adjacent jurisdictions. Back-to-back virtual Public Workshops were held on December 15 and 16, 2020. Each Theme section of the Circulation Element was discussed in more detail. The existing Themes include Mobility, Roadway System, Regional Transportation, Public
Transportation, Alternative Transportation Modes, Transportation Systems Management,
Parking, and Transportation Funding. The current Goals and Policies were covered in detail. A robust exchange of verbal and written comments and questions was a part of these workshops. The public was interested in Complete Streets, bicycle infrastructure, climate change, regional traffic impacts in neighborhoods, electric vehicles, rideshare operations (e.g., Uber and Lyft), autonomous vehicles, and parking availability. The fourth virtual Public Workshop was held on February 10, 2021. This workshop was presented as a Visioning opportunity. Staff discussed the comments and ideas that we heard from the community in the previous workshops. There was a discussion in this workshop with regards to maintaining consistency with the OCTA Master Plan of Arterial Highways. Possible loss of funding and the process to make any changes to the Master Plan was covered in detail. The primary goal of the workshop was to outline the policies that would not be changing, and policies that are proposed to be modified or added.
166
Overview of the Update The majority of the existing policies are not proposed to be changed. They are general policies for providing an integrated transportation system, supporting public transit, maintaining regional consistency with the OCTA Master Plan, improving traffic signal operations, providing adequate parking for development, etc. These important goals and policies are still relevant today and will be in the future. The policies that are proposed to be modified and added are a direct result of the State mandates to support Complete Streets and VMT, community input and some staff proposals. A new section has been added to specifically cover new policies addressing Climate
Change by reducing VMT and greenhouse gas emissions. There are three new policies related to VMT methodology and mitigation measures. There is also a new policy to reduce passenger car use by using curbside right-of-way for rideshare drop-off, valet, and delivery. A policy is added requiring the addition of Electric Vehicle charging stations throughout the city. A new section has been added to address Emerging Technology. There are new policies for monitoring rideshare (e.g., Uber and Lyft) volumes, to plan for autonomous and connected vehicles, to communicate with wayfinding providers (e.g., WAZE, apple Maps, Google Maps, etc.) to reduce regional traffic within neighborhoods, and considering deployment of parking application technology to identify available parking spaces. The existing 2014 Bicycle Master Plan is incorporated in the updated Circulation Element, with a policy to plan, fund and implement active transportation projects outlined in the Master Plan. Bicycle supporting facilities including bike racks, bike stations or lockers are to be incorporated into certain new development projects. To address a regularly raised topic, a new policy is added to review bicycle sidewalk use, review sidewalk widths and consider separate facilities for e-bikes and other semi-motorized modes to reduce conflicts. Complete Streets and roadway safety are very important issues. A policy has been added to develop a Complete Streets master plan. The Orange County Council of Governments Complete Streets Initiative Design Handbook will be the foundation for the master plan. To address roadway safety for all users, a policy is added to implement traffic safety improvements following the practices of the industry-recognized “Safe System Approach”.
167
Next Steps and Summary City staff is presenting the Initial Draft of the Circulation Element Update for discussion and is looking for the Planning Commission to review the draft document and provide input and direction. Staff will be conducting a Virtual Public Workshop on April 5, 2021, starting at 6 p.m. in the evening to solicit feedback on the initial draft. The draft will also be presented to City Council in May where the Council can review and provide input and direction. Over this Summer, a complete traffic analysis will be prepared as part of the analysis of both the Housing and Circulation Element updates. The analysis will evaluate the inclusion of all of the housing units anticipated by the draft Housing Element. The traffic study will contain a traditional intersection level of service (LOS) analysis given existing and proposed Circulation Element policies requiring this type of analysis. It will be used for roadway and intersection planning purposes only. The traffic analysis will be prepared per the requirements of the Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO). The results of the traffic analysis could indicate changes to the City’s Master Plan of Streets and Highways. The LOS analysis will not be part of the draft EIR because the impacts of vehicle delay are no longer part of the CEQA impact analysis process pursuant to State law (SB 743). The traffic analysis will include an assessment of VMT and it will be incorporated within the DEIR as VMT is the new traffic metric for CEQA analysis pursuant to SB 743. Going forward, the update schedule will be:
• March 18, 2021 – Planning Commission Study Session
• April 5, 2021 – Virtual Public Workshop
• May 11 or 25, 2021 – City Council Study Session
• EIR Comment Period – Summer 2021
• August 2021 – Public Workshop and Planning Commission Study Session
• September 2021 – Planning Commission public hearing
• October 2021 – City Council public hearing Environmental Review This is a discussion item and no action will be taken and as a result, it is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City is in the process of preparing a draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Housing and Circulation Element Updates that will be available later this Summer. Adoption of the updates would occur after preparation and certification of the Final EIR.
168
Public Notice The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting) and it was posted at City Hall and on the City website. In addition to the required noticing, advance notice has been provided through the City's social media accounts (e.g., Nextdoor, etc.), e-notification system, and utility bill inserts. Prepared by: Submitted By:
ATTACHMENTS PC 1 Initial Draft of the General Plan Circulation Element Update
169
Attachment No. PC 1
Initial Draft of the General Plan Circulation Element Update
170
INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE171
DRAFT
City of Newport Beach
CIRCULATION ELEMENT
172
INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE173
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-2
CIRCULATION ELEMENT
A Safe and Convenient Transportation System for All
Introduction DRAFT
The County of Orange continues to grow as a thriving urban residential and employment region.
Over the years, Newport Beach has transformed along with the County. Once a small community
and seasonal getaway, Newport Beach is now home to 86,000 residents and is a global destination
for travel. As a result, travel in Newport Beach and the surrounding communities has evolved.
Demographics and technology are changing the demand for and delivery of different travel modes.
The legacy of the pandemic may also further change travel demand and travel habits. The trend from
regional and State levels of governments has been to provide greater regulation regarding the
planning and programming of transportation. The Circulation Element of the Newport Beach
General Plan governs the long term development of mobility systems in the City of Newport Beach
and provides the best opportunity for the City to establish its vision of mobility. The Circulation
Element acknowledges the influences of local, regional, State and federal guidance and regulation,
and expresses the ultimate vision of mobility to respond to the needs and objectives of Newport
Beach residents. The goals and policies in the Circulation Element are balanced with the goals and
policies of the Land Use and Housing Elements in order to provide a correlation between land use
and transportation planning. In so doing the General Plan provides the best possible balance
between the City’s future growth, service levels for all travel modes, and community character. The
Circulation Element is consistent with the Complete Streets Act (Assembly Bill 1358), the
Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (Senate Bill 375), the Vehicle Miles
Traveled provisions of Senate Bill 743 (Steinberg, 2013), the Transportation Demand Management
Ordinance, and the Local Coastal Program. DRAFT174
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-3
Context DRAFT
SETTING
Newport Beach is centrally located among the six coastal cities in Orange County. The City of Newport
Beach was incorporated in 1906, only ten years after Henry Ford built his first automobile. The
community has changed along with transportation options from days of the Pacific Electric Red Car
to wide adoption and then reliance on automobiles. Even as freeways came to symbolize Southern
California, no freeways traversed Newport Beach. The Costa Mesa freeway (SR-55) terminates just
north of Newport Beach and the San Joaquin Transportation Corridor (SR-73) skirts the city’s northern
edge. Newport Beach instead relies on regional roadways for connections and transportation including
Coast Highway, Newport Boulevard, Jamboree Road, and MacArthur Boulevard). In the future,
emerging technology and greater access for alternative transportation modes are anticipated to affect
and be affected by Newport Beach as it grows.
Newport Beach is a collection of villages and neighborhoods including Balboa Peninsula, Cannery
Village, the Islands of Newport Harbor, Mariners’ Mile, Newport Heights, Dover Shores, Corona Del
Mar, Newport Coast, Newport Center/Fashion Island, Big Canyon, Back Bay, and Eastbluff. These
neighborhoods rely on local streets for transportation and are connected by regional roadways.
Regional traffic also uses the regional roadways, which has reduced the City’s ability to allocate space
to alternative travel modes. Summertime beach traffic has been a predictable source of traffic volumes
near or exceeding roadway capacity in the beach areas for a century.
Growth in Orange County, and especially communities neighboring Newport Beach will increase
regional through traffic and summertime beach traffic. These increases will occur whether or not
Newport Beach plans for it. This Circulation Element plans for anticipated regional growth and seeks
regional cooperation to accommodate regional traffic growth.
Roads have been the primary means of getting around Newport Beach, but Newport Harbor presents
an opportunity for community specific transportation and recreation alternatives. Water transportation
between Newport Beach and Santa Catalina Island, harbors and ports up and down Southern
California, and between Balboa Island and the Balboa Peninsula is already present. More water
transportation services (public or private) could be established between locations in Newport Beach to
reduce the reliance on roadways.
LOCAL ROADWAY SYSTEM
Local roadways are planned to accommodate traffic circulating the local village or neighborhood they
serve. Keeping regional traffic off of local streets preserves right-of-way for its intended use and for
use by other transportation modes. In recognition of the need to discourage non-local cut-through
traffic from using residential streets, the City Council adopted Policy L-26 (Traffic Management Policy)
in 2006 (amended in 2015 and 2018). This policy provides tools and a process for managing the speed
and volume of vehicles on residential streets and implementing considered responses that do not simply
shift cut-through traffic from one residential street to another. DRAFT175
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-4
ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
Much of the traffic traversing Newport Beach uses regional roadways, simply passing through town.
Regional serving roadways are categorized according to the type and quantity of traffic they are
designed to accommodate through the roadway classification system adopted in the City of Newport
Beach Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH). The roadway classifications used by the City of
Newport Beach are required to be consistent with the County of Orange Master Plan of Arterial
Highways (MPAH), which is administered by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA).
OCTA is the regional agency responsible for overseeing the regional transportation system and local
agency compliance with regional and statewide programs such as the Congestion Management Program
(CMP). The roadway classifications and their generalized daily capacity, used for long range General
Plan analysis, are presented below. Roadways may be able to carry traffic above the typical capacity
level identified in these basic classifications if the standard section is augmented. Augmented sections
could include additional through lanes, additional turning lanes at intersections with high turning
volumes, or through signal synchronization.
Principal Arterial—A Principal arterial highway is typically an eight-lane divided roadway. A Principal
arterial is designed to accommodate a daily capacity ranging from 45,000 to 60,000. Principal arterials
carry a large volume of regional through traffic not handled by the freeway system.
Major Arterial— A Major arterial highway is typically a six-lane divided roadway. A Major arterial is
designed to accommodate a daily capacity ranging from 30,000 to 45,000. Major arterials carry a large
volume of regional through traffic not handled by the freeway system. A Major Augmented is similar
to a Major arterial, but may include additional lanes, particularly at intersections, resulting in a daily
capacity ranging from 52,000 to 70,000.
Primary Arterial— A Primary arterial highway is usually a four-lane divided roadway. A Primary
arterial is designed to accommodate a daily capacity ranging from 20,000 to 30,000. A Primary arterial’s
function is similar to that of a Principal or Major arterial. The chief difference is capacity. A Primary
Augmented is similar to a Primary arterial, but may include additional lanes, particularly at intersections,
resulting in a daily capacity ranging from 35,000 to 50,000.
Secondary Arterial— A Secondary arterial highway is a four-lane roadway (often undivided). A
Secondary arterial distributes traffic between local streets and Major or Primary arterials. Although
some Secondary arterials serve as through routes, most provide more direct access to surrounding land
uses than Principal, Major, or Primary arterials. Secondary arterials carry a daily capacity ranging from
10,000 to 20,000.
Commuter Roadway—A commuter roadway is a two-to-four-lane, unrestricted access roadway with
a daily capacity ranging from 7,500 to 15,000. It differs from a local street in its ability to handle
through traffic movements between arterials.
ROADWAY OPERATIONS
The efficient operation of the circulation system is constrained by conflict and congestion at
intersections. Intersections that do not perform well can affect roadway conditions upstream and
downstream, impact access to adjacent parcels, increase vehicle collisions, present safety hazards to
other travel modes, and concentrate air pollution. Conflict and congestion are usually the result of
traffic volume. The residents of Newport Beach desire good traffic flow and the ability to get from one
side of the city to the other. However, there are impediments to this. DRAFT176
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-5
In Newport Beach, natural barriers (including the Pacific Ocean, the Santa Ana River, and Upper
Newport Bay) and the John Wayne Airport superblock limit roadway connections. As a result, traffic
volumes are concentrated on the roadways making regional connections (i.e., Coast Highway, Bristol
Street/SR-73, Newport Boulevard, Jamboree Road, and MacArthur Boulevard) which increases
conflict and congestion at intersections along these routes. Because other coastal communities have
similar barriers, regional traffic with no origin or destination in Newport Beach also uses these limited
connections through Newport Beach, further increasing traffic. Summertime beach traffic is not
affected by Newport Beach land use policy. For that reason, it has been and continues to be the practice
of the City to analyze traffic conditions outside of the summer season to determine the function and
operation of City streets.
The Highway Capacity Manual provides methodology for measuring intersection performance in terms
of delay experienced by vehicles traversing the intersection. As detailed below, letter grades are assigned
based on the amount of delay experienced by vehicles during the peak commute hours. Unlike school
grades, however, level of service A is not necessarily a goal. An intersection performing at level of
service A could indicate that too much right-of-way is dedicated to vehicle travel lanes and not enough
right-of-way is dedicated to other travel modes such as bicycles and pedestrians.
■ LOS “A”—Minimal delay (less than 10 seconds on average) is experienced.
■ LOS “B”—Vehicles at signalized intersections experience between 10 and 20 seconds of delay
on average, while vehicles on the side street STOP controlled approaches at unsignalized
intersections experience between 10 and 15 seconds of average delay.
■ LOS “C”—Delays at signalized intersections range from 20 to 35 seconds and from 15 to 25
seconds for side street / STOP controlled traffic at unsignalized intersections.
■ LOS “D”—Delays at signalized intersections range from 35 to 55 seconds and from 25 to 35
seconds for side street / STOP controlled approaches at unsignalized intersections.
■ LOS “E”—Delays at signalized intersections range from 55 to 80 seconds on average, while
delays for side street / STOP controlled traffic at unsignalized intersections range from 35 to 50
seconds.
■ LOS “F”—All vehicles at signalized intersections can be expected to wait through more than a
single signal cycle with average delays in excess of 80 seconds, while delays to side street / STOP
controlled approaches at unsignalized intersections will exceed 50 seconds on average.
The City of Newport Beach has traditionally set LOS D as its goal for intersection performance where
possible. Establishing and maintaining a target requires a balance between goals such as accessibility
for all travel modes congestion, delay, emergency response, community character, and capital
expenditure. It is also important to recognize that some sources of traffic (such as summertime beach
traffic) may expand to use any new capacity provided. In the past, LOS E was established as the goal
in the airport area and at specific intersections in Corona del Mar to achieve the desired balance.
A traffic analysis of the Land Use and Housing Elements is underway that will forecast future traffic
volumes, analyze intersection performance, and identify necessary roadway and intersection
improvements to maintain LOS D. Once those needs are determined, the City of Newport Beach will
consider all goals and may establish LOS E as the standard for some of the City’s intersections. DRAFT177
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-6
Recently, the State has made changes to the measurement of transportation impacts under the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As of July 2020, all jurisdictions must analyze vehicle
miles traveled (VMT) for the purposes of CEQA. While VMT contributes to congestion, by itself it
cannot be used to measure congestion impacts or congestion relief. VMT is a good measure of effects
contributing to climate change. Newport Beach is concerned about climate change and sea level rise
and adopted the Vehicle Miles Traveled Implementation Guide in May 2020 and requires the analysis
of VMT for the purposes of CEQA. However, Newport Beach originally established the Traffic
Phasing Ordinance in 1978, which requires analysis of vehicle LOS when planning transportation
improvements in coordination with land use development. In addition, vehicle LOS analysis is still
required by the Orange County CMP. Therefore, the City of Newport Beach requires the analysis of
VMT for the purposes of CEQA and also requires the analysis of vehicle LOS for compliance with the
Traffic Phasing Ordinance and the CMP.
TRUCK TRAFFIC
Trucks are necessary to deliver goods, collect refuse, and service utilities throughout Newport Beach.
Truck trips can, however, result in noise and other impacts to residents, increase traffic congestion,
and shorten the lifespan of infrastructure. Commercial vehicles weighing in excess of 3 tons (6,000
pounds) are prohibited from certain roadways, when posted. Concentrated periods of high truck traffic,
such as during construction of large development projects, have increased potential for noise,
congestion, and roadway damage impacts. The City of Newport Beach could control and limit those
impacts by reviewing and approving construction management plans for large development projects in
addition to monitoring construction traffic associated with residential projects.
REGIONAL FACILITIES
Many different agencies plan and operate regional transportation facilities that are used by residents of
Newport Beach and vehicles passing through Newport Beach. These include the State, the Southern
California Association of Governments (SCAG), OCTA, the Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA),
and neighboring cities. The County of Orange owns and operates John Wayne Airport, which is a
generator of special use traffic neighboring Newport Beach. The City of Newport Beach coordinates
with outside agencies on matters relevant to the mobility of Newport Beach residents.
The State, through the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), is the owner/operator of
major regional routes used by Newport Beach residents including I-405, SR-55, Newport Boulevard,
and Coast Highway. Coast Highway is owned and operated by Caltrans with the exception of the
segment between Jamboree Road and Newport Coast Drive. Newport Boulevard from Finley Street
to the northerly city limits at Industrial Way is also under Caltrans jurisdiction. Caltrans controls the
signal timing and signal coordination along these roadways. The City of Newport Beach coordinates
with Caltrans related to signal timing and seeks greater coordination related to incorporating emerging
technology and the latest transportation system management techniques.
SCAG is the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for preparing the Regional
Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) for Southern California. The
RTP/SCS is prepared every four years and outlines the region’s vision for use of regional facilities and
delivery of mobility. The City of Newport Beach provides local data for the RTP/SCS process to ensure
Newport Beach is accurately represented and provides feedback on draft strategies. DRAFT178
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-7
As previously mentioned, OCTA is the regional agency responsible for overseeing the regional
transportation system, the County Master Plan of Arterial Highways, and local agency compliance with
regional and statewide programs such as the CMP, which is prepared every two years. The CMP
roadways within Newport Beach are Coast Highway, Newport Boulevard, MacArthur Boulevard, and
Jamboree Road. The City of Newport Beach provides local data for the CMP preparation. OCTA also
prepares a Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) every four years that establishes a vision for
Orange County mobility that is submitted to SCAG for inclusion in the RTP/SCS. The City of
Newport Beach monitors the LRTP and provides feedback related to the needs of Newport Beach
residents. The TCA operates the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor (SR-73). The City of
Newport Beach is a partner in this joint powers authority.
OCTA provides a forum for communication and coordination between neighboring jurisdictions for
the efficient delivery of mobility across jurisdictional borders through regional plans such as the
MPAH, Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan, and OC Go. One example of effective cross-jurisdictional
coordination has been the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program. The City of Newport
Beach coordinates with neighboring jurisdictions seeking effective planning and delivery of
transportation facilities.
JWA is a part of the regional system of airports serving air travel for Orange County residents, workers,
and visitors. The Newport Beach Aviation Committee assists the City in the implementation of Council
Policy A-17 (Newport Beach Council Airport Policy).
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
Fixed route bus service and on-demand paratransit in Newport Beach (and all of Orange County) is
operated by OCTA. One of the bus routes in Newport Beach connects the Newport Transportation
Center (located at MacArthur Boulevard and San Joaquin Hills Road in Newport Center) to the
countywide bus network. In order to maintain State mandated revenue/cost balance, OCTA
occasionally revises their service schedule. During periods of increased public transportation use,
service routes are extended and new routes may be added. During periods of decreased public
transportation use, service areas with the lowest ridership are contracted. OCTA’s most recent review
of bus service, the Bus 360 program, concentrated bus service in the central part of Orange County
and reduced bus service in South Orange County and the periphery.
OC Go Project V provides funding for community based transit/circulators. The Newport Beach
summer shuttle service on the Balboa Peninsula is partially funded by Project V. The City of Newport
Beach would consider pilot programs for other shuttle routes, potentially connecting the villages within
Newport Beach.
The extensive use of rideshare services has been one of the factors leading to declining bus ridership.
As part of the Bus 360 program, OCTA even tested use of rideshare operators to provide on-demand
mobility service in lieu of reduced fixed route service. In some markets, rideshare drivers have begun
offering subscription rates for customers with regular medical appointments. The trend is clearly
toward more trips being taken with this travel mode and the City of Newport Beach is considering
ways to accommodate the demand such as designating curbside drop-off zones in commercial areas. DRAFT179
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-8
TRAILS
Trail systems provide functional alternatives to automobile travel and recreational opportunities for the
community. The trail system in Newport Beach has been developed for commuter and recreational
bicyclists, pedestrians, and equestrians.
Bicycle Trails
This Circulation Element incorporates the 2014 City of Newport Beach Bicycle Master Plan and any
future updates to that plan. The Bicycle Master Plan identifies four types of bicycle facilities.
1. Bicycle Path (Caltrans Class I). Provides for bicycle travel on a paved right-of-way separated
from any street or highway. Includes sidewalk adjacent to street.
2. Bicycle Lane (Caltrans Class II). Provides a striped and stenciled lane for bicycle travel on a
street or highway.
3. Bicycle Route (Caltrans Class III). Provides for a shared use with motor vehicle traffic and
may be identified by signing. Stencil markings identifying a recommended position for bicycles
may also be provided.
4. Bicycle Trail. Provides a dirt pathway designated for the use of bicycles and pedestrians
completely separated from motor vehicle traffic.
Subsequent to adoption of the Bicycle Master Plan, Caltrans has included an additional classification
of bicycle facility in the Highway Design Manual and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices. A Class IV Bikeway (also known as a cycle track) is an on-road facility separated from vehicle
traffic by a physical barrier. The City may incorporate this type of facility into the Bicycle Master Plan
in the future.
The facility needs of bicyclists vary with the function of the trip and the speed and skill level of the
rider. Those residents who use bicycles daily for their primary means of transportation likely prefer the
most convenient and direct route available to their destination. These bicyclists normally will select a
route along a primary or a major highway. In contrast, the recreational rider might choose a route for
its scenic interest such as a ride on a bike trail separated from vehicular traffic. New or infrequent
bicycle riders may prefer a route separated from vehicle travel or along a route with low vehicle volume
and speeds. Thus, it is necessary to provide bikeways for bicyclists along major transportation corridors
as well as alternative routes. It is also necessary to provide bikeways which separate faster cyclists from
pedestrian travel and slower cyclists, integrating bicycle travel more closely with vehicular traffic, and
bikeways which separate slower cyclists from motor vehicle traffic.
The City has designated additional off road facilities in the form of sidewalk bikeways, which provide
improved bicycle safety for children within high use corridors in the vicinity of schools, beaches, and
residential neighborhoods. The City will periodically review the Bicycle Sidewalk Resolution to
determine whether areas permitting bicycle use on sidewalks are serving the intended purpose, whether
additional permitted areas are desirable, and whether restrictions on use (e.g., bicycle speed limits) are
warranted. Review of the Bicycle Sidewalk Resolution and strategies for separating faster cyclists from
pedestrians and slower cyclists will become more important due to the emergence of electric-assisted
bicycles (e-bikes).
Researchers have noted the rapid uptake of e-bikes by consumers, that e-bikes are more likely than
standard bicycles to replace car trips, and that trips with e-bikes are longer than trips with standard DRAFT180
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-9
bicycles. The availability of e-bikes also expands the potential group of users of bicycle facilities and
the range of all users of those facilities. This emerging technology may improve the mobility of
Newport Beach residents, but the City would like to ensure that the benefits to some do not come at
the expense of safety to other users and residents.
Pedestrian Corridors
Newport Beach has a variety of pedestrian and multi-use facilities. These include sidewalks through
developed areas, the oceanfront boardwalk on the Balboa Peninsula, bayfront walkways, and trails
along Upper Newport Bay and in open space areas. Coastal areas see high pedestrian activity including
Balboa Island, Balboa Peninsula, Corona del Mar, and Mariners’ Mile. High volumes of pedestrians
cross Coast Highway through Mariners’ Mile. Where there are opportunities, the City of Newport
Beach will consider providing more Bayfront walkways along the Balboa Peninsula and Mariners’ Mile.
These walkways will help to accommodate high pedestrian volumes while also providing an alternative
network separate from high vehicle volume streets. Closing low volume minor streets and alleys and
creating pedestrian promenades or activity areas can also be a strategy to create a pedestrian friendly
network while activating a business district. In addition, overhead pedestrian crossings should be
considered to improve pedestrian safety.
Equestrian Trails
Equestrian trails are primarily located in the Santa Ana Heights portion of the City. These trails, and
other equestrian facilities, are highly valued by residents of this area and provide regional recreation
opportunities as well.
COMPLETE STREETS
While alternative modes such as bicycles have always been permitted to use the roadway network, the
Complete Streets Act (Assembly Bill 1358) requires that Circulation Elements “plan for a balanced
multimodal transportation network that meets the needs of all users of streets, roads, and highways,
defined to include motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists, children, persons with disabilities, seniors, movers
of commercial goods, and users of public transportation, in a manner that is suitable to the rural,
suburban, or urban context of the general plan.” Providing a balance for multiple modes is one strategy
toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions and combating climate change consistent with the City’s
goals of reducing risks to residents from climate change and sea level rise. Additionally, research shows
that a multimodal transportation system, encouraging choice of bicycle walking and rolling modes, can
enhance local economic development and improve public health. The City of Newport Beach uses the
Orange County Council of Governments (OCCOG) Complete Streets Initiative Design Handbook to
implement the City’s complete streets vision.
Planning for a balanced multimodal transportation network does not mean that every street allocates
equal space to all travel modes. In fact, satisfactory service levels are difficult to provide on all streets
for all travel modes due to the competing interests between modes. Automobile friendly streets have
high travel speeds, wide lanes, and separate turn lanes all of which decrease pedestrian service levels.
Rather than trying to simultaneously serve competing needs, the City of Newport Beach favors a
layered network approach to complete streets planning. In a layered network, a street is prioritized for
a particular travel mode (or multiple travel modes benefiting from similar characteristics) but the
network as a whole provides for the mobility of all users of roadways. DRAFT181
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-10
EMERGING TECHNOLOGY
The City of Newport Beach has used and continues to use technology to improve the delivery and
performance of mobility. Transportation System Management techniques have been used to enhance
capacity without physical roadway widening while retaining the community character and limiting the
impact of the roadway system on the environment. Examples of Transportation System Management
improvements include intelligent transportation system improvements at traffic signals, traffic signal
coordination and improvements to roadway signage along busy routes (especially to tourist
destinations), and the completion of the traffic management center in City Hall allowing for traffic
monitoring and remote signal operation. The City also replaced old street lighting to more efficient
LED fixtures to reduce electricity consumption and the City’s carbon footprint.
Technology is changing rapidly and the City of Newport Beach will respond to the challenges and
opportunities presented by emerging technology. The number of electric vehicles (EV) using our
roadways will continue to grow and have fueling needs that are distinct from gasoline powered vehicles.
Rideshare services continue to grow ridership and simultaneously the need for designated places to
drop-off and pick-up are growing. Wayfinding apps help people to navigate our roadways, but the
directions provided do not always show the most direct route or respect roadway classification.
Traditional engineering techniques may not be effective in redirecting this source of traffic volume and
the City of Newport Beach is investigating potential strategies.
Vehicles with limited self-driving capability are already on our roadways. On the horizon, the City
anticipates that vehicle-to-everything (V2X) infrastructure improvements will be needed to
accommodate and realize the advantages offered by connected and autonomous vehicles. Potential
advantages from connected vehicles include feedback regarding roadway maintenance needs, uniform
traffic flows, real time signal synchronization, improved safety for drivers and other travel modes, and
reduced GHG emissions. While the City of Newport Beach is aware of what is happening now and
what is anticipated in the near future, the City must remain flexible and adapt to rapidly changing
transportation options in order to experience the benefits offered while avoiding the pitfalls of change.
The City of Newport Beach retains the Travel Demand Management (TDM) Ordinance requiring
projects to reduce the number of peak-period vehicle trips by providing facilities to support alternate
modes and encouraging the use of alternative transportation modes, such as carpools, vanpools, public
transit, bicycles, and walking. Employers can also offer flexible work schedules, including work-from-
home. All of these techniques are enhanced by emerging technologies. Adopting TDM measures not
only reduces peak-period vehicle trips and associated GHG emissions, but could also reduce parking
demand.
CLIMATE CHANGE
Newport Beach is concerned about climate change and sea level rise. As seen in other parts of the
country, climate change can increase the frequency and intensity of natural emergencies. The City of
Newport Beach is planning for these contingencies using tsunami warning signs, evacuation planning
and battery back-up systems for traffic signals. Initiatives included in the Circulation Element such as
planning for a balanced multimodal network including support for additional transit facilities in higher
density areas and measures to reduce VMT help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat
climate change. The City of Newport Beach intends to do more to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
and combat climate change. On City property, the City can provide more EV charging stations, bicycle DRAFT182
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-11
parking, and other supporting facilities. The City can encourage or require these supporting facilities
on privately owned property within Newport Beach. The City can also encourage local businesses to
establish and maintain telework programs in addition to carpooling/vanpooling.
PARKING
Similar to other coastal communities, parking availability is limited citywide, especially in some areas
during the peak summer months. Areas of Newport Beach that were largely subdivided prior to
widespread adoption of the automobile are areas of particular concern (i.e., Balboa Peninsula, Balboa
Island, and Corona Del Mar). The Balboa Village Parking Management Overlay Plan included
recommendations. The City of Newport Beach has implemented some of the recommendations (i.e.,
beginning to implement parking meter time limits, providing bus layover areas, improving intersection
visibility with additional red curbing, and monitoring lot utilization). Implementing additional
recommendations is being considered including increasing parking meter fees, consolidating public
parking, and initiating a shared parking program. Similar Parking Management Overlay plans could be
implemented in other activity areas including Corona del Mar, Mariners’ Mile, McFadden Wharf,
Cannery Village, and Balboa Island.
Technology changes make other innovative solutions possible. The City of Newport Beach uses a
smartphone app to allow remote payment of fees at parking meters, which has increased compliance.
This program could be expanded to provide the location of and directions to available parking spaces,
which could reduce circling while looking for a parking space and the congestion those movements
cause. Increased use of rideshare services may reduce parking demand for some land uses or in some
areas of Newport Beach. Future review of off-street parking requirements may allow reuse of vehicle
parking spaces for bicycle parking or could permit reallocation of curbside space. Alternatives for
management of curbside space include valet or rideshare pick-up/drop-off and deliveries, further
supporting a trend toward less private vehicle parking.
TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
Newport Beach receives funding for transportation improvements from gasoline tax apportionment
(including SB-1), OC Go (also known as Measure M) local turnback, OC Go competitive programs,
the State, federal funds, developer fees (i.e., the Traffic Phasing Ordinance and Fair Share Traffic
Contribution Ordinance), and the General Fund. The City of Newport Beach leverages City resources
to improve the chances of winning competitive funding sources (e.g., MacArthur Boulevard
improvements, Superior Avenue pedestrian bridge, and more). The effect of revisions to CEQA
measuring transportation impacts in terms of VMT on developer fees is not known at this time. A
regional VMT mitigation program, if established, may offer a new funding source for public transit or
alternative transportation projects.
The City of Newport Beach will have additional expenditures in the future to adapt existing
infrastructure with emerging technology, including traffic signal improvements for compatibility with
connected and autonomous vehicles. The City of Newport Beach is considering potential sources of
funding for these expenditures. DRAFT183
7-12 N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Goals and Policies DRAFT
Goa l
CE 1.1
An overall transportation system that facilitates the movement of people and goods within and through
the City of Newport Beach and accommodates conservative growth within the City of Newport Beach,
but is not expanded primarily to accommodate growth in the surrounding region.
Policies
CE 1.1.1 Comprehensive Transportation System
Provide a diverse transportation system that provides mobility options for the
community. (Imp 16.8, 16.11)
CE 1.1.2 Integrated System of Multiple Modes
Provide an integrated transportation system that supports the land use plan set
forth in the Land Use Element. (Imp 2.1)
CE 1.1.3 Levels of Service Related to Community Character
Establish Maintain level of service standards that reflect the character of the
various unique districts and neighborhoods of Newport Beach. (Imp 16.2, 16.4,
16.6, 16.7)
CE 1.1.X Circulation Complete Streets System for All Users
Develop a Complete Streets master plan and design guide based upon best
practices (e.g., Orange County Council of Governments Complete Streets
Initiative Design Handbook, 2016) that prioritizes City rights of way to allow all
users safe and efficient mobility. Pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and transit
riders of all ages and abilities are able to safely move along and across the
mobility system of Newport Beach.
Goa l
CE 1.2
Reduced summertime visitor traffic impacts.
Policies
CE 1.2.1 Wayfinding
Implement way-finding signs for vehicles and pedestrians, especially specifically for
tourist destination areas. (Imp 16.7)
Mobility DRAFT184
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-13
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
CE 1.2.2 Shuttle Service
Encourage and maintain remote visitor parking and shuttle services. (Imp 14.4)
CE 1.2.X Internal Shuttle
Study the potential of implementing a pilot program, for a shuttle system
connecting the villages of Newport Beach.
CE 1.2.3 Traffic System Management
Identify andContinue to implement measures, such as special traffic signal timing,
to reduce the impact of high volume summer traffic on persons living along and
around the beach and bay, as well as visitors. (Imp 16.7)
CE 1.2.4 Public Transit
Support and encourage OCTA efforts to provide / fund summertime
expanded bus service and/or local shuttle services to reduce visitor traffic.
(Imp 16.8)
Goa l
CE 1.3
Truck routes that support goods movement to and from land use in the City while minimizing
adverse impacts to residents or businesses.
Policies
CE 1.3.1 Truck Routes
Allow truck use of City streets except selected residential and arterial streets
adjacent to residential areas and school zones necessary to minimize impacts
of truck traffic on residential areas. (Imp 16.9)
CE 1.3.2 Impacts of Trucks
Provide appropriately designed and maintained roadways to safely
accommodate truck travel and minimize noise and vibration. (Imp 16.9)
CE 1.3.3 Management of Truck Activities
Actively manage trucking activities related to oversize loads such as large
boats and comparable characteristics. (Imp 16.9)
CE 1.3.X Construction Management Plans
Develop program to require CMP for large developments to address haul
routes, hours of operation, and number of truck trips.DRAFT185
7-14 N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Roadway System
Goa l
CE 2.1
A roadway system with no significant gaps that provides for the efficient movement of goods and
people in the City of Newport Beach, while maintaining the community’s character and its
residents’ quality of life.
Policies
CE 2.1.1 Level of Service Standards
Plan the arterial roadway system to accommodate projected traffic at the
following level of service standards:
A. Level of Service (LOS) “D” throughout the City, unless otherwise noted
B. LOS “E” at any intersection in the Airport Area shared with Irvine and Corona del
Mar (subject to findings of Circulation Element traffic study)
C. LOS “E” at Coast Highway (EW) and Dover Drive (NS) due to right-
of-way limitations
D. LOS “E” at Marguerite Avenue (NS) and Coast Highway (EW) in the
pedestrian oriented area of Corona del Mar
E. LOS “E” at Goldenrod Avenue (NS) and Coast Highway (EW) in the
pedestrian oriented area of in Corona del Mar (Imp 16.3)
CE 2.1.2 Street and Highway Network
Construct the circulation system described on the map entitled Newport Beach
Circulation Element-Master Plan of Streets and Highways shown in Figure CE1
and Figure CE2 (cross-section). (Imp 14.9, 16.3)
CE 2.1.3 Current Traffic Data
Monitor traffic conditions on an ongoing basis and update Master Plan as
necessary. (Imp 16.4)
CE 2.1.4 Roadway Improvements
Pursue construction of intersection improvements shown on Figure CE3(subject
to findings of the Circulation Element traffic study) or alternate improvements
that achieve an acceptable level of service. (Imp 16.3)
CE 2.1.5 MacArthur Boulevard Widening
Plan the addition of lanes to MacArthur Boulevard between Harbor View Drive
and the prolongation of Crown Drive so that more than four lanes are constructed
only when the daily volume to capacity ratio equals or exceeds 1.0 in that section
of MacArthur Boulevard, not counting trips generated by the MacArthur
Boulevard access drive to Corona del mar Plaza, and after public hearings before DRAFT186
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-15
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
the Planning Commission and City Council, and only by narrowing the median.
(Imp 16.3)
CE 2.1.6 Protection of Right-of-Way
Protect right-of-way for designated future streets and highways through all
practicable means. (Imp 2.1)
Goa l
CE 2.2
A safe and efficient roadway system.
Policies
CE 2.2.1 Safe Roadways
Provide for safe roadway conditions by adhering to nationally recognized
improvement standards and uniform construction and maintenance practices.
(Imp 16.4, 16.6)
CE 2.2.X Safe System Approach
Review best practices for safe circulation systems and implement appropriate
technologies/infrastructure consistent with the industry recognized Safe System
approach. Incorporate traffic safety improvement projects in the annual Capital
Improvement Program.
CE 2.2.2 Up-to-Date Standards
Periodically review and update street standards to current multimodal
capacity and safety practices. (Imp 16.4, 16.6)
CE 2.2.3 Traffic Control
Design traffic control measures to ensure City streets and roads function with
safety and efficiency for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. (Imp 16.7)
CE 2.2.4 Driveway and Access Limitations
Limit driveway and local street access on arterial streets to maintain a desired
quality of traffic flow and limit hazards to active transportation modes.
Wherever possible, consolidate and/or reduce the number of driveways and
implement access controls during redevelopment of adjacent parcels. (Imp
16.1)
CE 2.2.5 Neighborhood Traffic Calming
Balance safety, quality of life, and efficiency when considering cut-through
traffic and traffic calming improvements to local neighborhood streets.
Address neighborhood traffic concerns through City Council Policy L-26.
(Imp 16.6)
DRAFT187
7-16 N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
CE 2.2.6 Emergency Access
Provide all residential, commercial, and industrial areas with efficient and safe
access for emergency vehicles and provide signage for emergency evacuation
routes. (Imp 16.6)
CE 2.2.7 Alleys
Alleys in new developments shall be 20’ wide to facilitate circulation. (Imp 8.1)
Goa l
CE 2.3
Optimal roadway system operation.
Policies
CE 2.3.1 Coast Highway Ownership
Pursue ownership of Coast Highway throughout Newport Beach, as
opportunities arise, so that Coast Highway can be improved to its ultimate
width in Mariners’ Mile consistent with the City’s vision Master Plan of
Streets and Highways and the OCTA Master Plan of Arterial Highways and
to provide the City with more opportunities to increase operational
efficiencies. (Imp 2.1, 14.9)
CE 2.3.2 Roadway Maintenance
Support roadway maintenance programs that inspect, repair, and rehabilitate
pavement surfaces and sidewalks in order to preserve the high quality of City
streets and thoroughfares. (Imp 16.4)
CE 2.3.X New Development Maintenance Responsibility
Ensure minimization of traffic congestion impacts, parking impacts, and
noise impacts and ensure proper roadway maintenance through review and
approval of Construction Management Plans associated with new
development proposals in residential neighborhoods.
CE 2.3.3 Traffic Conditions Data Base
Monitor traffic conditions and optimize traffic signal operations and coordination
on an ongoing basis. (Imp 16.2)
CE 2.3.4 Improvements to Reflect Changing Traffic Conditions
Based on the monitoring of traffic conditions, consider additional improvements
in areas with operations issues, such as intersections with heavy turn volumes (e.g.
additional turn lanes, traffic signal progression, etc.). (Imp 16.2)
DRAFT188
N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n 7-17
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
Regional Transportation
Goa l
CE 3.1
A network of regional facilities which ensures the safe and efficient movement of people and goods
from within the City to areas outside its boundaries, and minimizes the use of City streets by regional
through traffic.
Policies
CE 3.1.1 Freeway System
Encourage ongoing regional investment in the freeway system. (Imp 14.1, 14.3, 14.9,
14.10)
CE 3.1.2 Integration of Transportation Systems with Adjoining Communities and
the Region
Interface with regional and surrounding local agencies, such as Caltrans, OCTA,
the County of Orange, John Wayne Airport, the Cities of Irvine, Costa Mesa, and
Huntington Beach, and the University of California, Irvine to implement systems
that serve the needs of regional travelers (vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians) in a
way that minimizes impacts on Newport Beach residents. (Imp 14.9, 14.10, 16.5)
CE 3.1.X Traffic from Adjoining Communities
The City of Newport Beach shall continue to monitor land development applications
in adjacent communities and encourage coordination on land development projects
that affect traffic and mobility in Newport Beach.
CE 3.1.3 Regional Consistency
The City of Newport Beach Master Plan of Streets and Highways (shown on
Figure CE1) shall be consistent with the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial
Highways. (Imp 16.5)
CE 3.1.4 Regional Traffic Mitigation
Continue to Pparticipate in programs (Orange County Congestion Management
Program, Growth Management ProgramSouthern California Association of
Governments Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy,
etc.) to mitigate reduce regional traffic congestion. (Imp 14.1, 14.3, 16.5)
CE 3.1.5 19th Street BridgeSanta Ana River Future Mobility Alternatives
Advocate for the implementation of needed study and review of regional
Master Plan transportation improvements, and be a strong advocate for
construction of the 19th Street Bridge along and/or across the Santa Ana
River, or alternative improvements that achieve the same improvements in DRAFT189
7-18 N e w p o r t B e a c h G e n e r a l P l a n
C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t
regional traffic flow,such as active transportation or electric vehicle
improvements that reduce passenger car use, offer mobility choice, enhance
recreation and community health and reduce vehicle miles traveled without
disproportionate impacts on Newport Beach including Coast Highway,
consistent with all environmental review requirements. (Imp 16.5) DRAFT190
Circulation Element
Newport Beach General Plan 7-19
N N
Public Transportation
Goa l
CE 4.1
A public transportation system that provides mobility for residents and encourages use of public
transportation as an alternative to automobile travel.
Policies
CE 4.1.1 Public Transit Efficiency
Support efforts by OCTA and other agencies to increase the effectiveness
and productivity of transit services, possibly including local shuttle services.
(Imp 14.4)
CE 4.1.2 Transit Services for Special Need Populations
Support efforts to increase accessible transit services and facilities for the
elderly, disabled, and other transportation disadvantaged persons. (Imp 16.8)
CE 4.1.3 Seasonal Public Transit
Coordinate with OCTA to provide seasonal, recreational, and special events
shuttles. (Imp 14.4, 16.8)
CE 4.1.4 Land Use Densities Supporting Public Transit
Accommodate residential densities sufficient to support transit patronage,
especially in mixed use areas such as the Airport Area. (Imp 2.1)
CE 4.1.5 John Wayne Airport Shuttles
Encourage the use of airport shuttle services to minimize the impacts of air
travelers on the local roadway system. (Imp 14.4, 16.8)
CE 4.1.6 Transit Support Facilities
Participate Cooperate with OCTA in efforts to provide additional develop
regional transit support facilities, including park-and-ride lots, bus stops, and
shelters in higher density residential areas or mixed-use development areas to
reduce passenger car travel through and within Newport Beach. (Imp 16.8)
CE 4.1.7 School Transit
Monitor the demand for additional private, public, and school transportation
available to serve the needs of K–12 students and advocate for improvements in
traffic from students. (Imp 14.2, 16.11)
DRAFT191
Circulation Eleme n t
7-20 Newport Beach General Plan
Alternative Transportation Modes
Goa l
CE 5.1
Convenient trail systems that satisfy recreational desires and transportation needs.
Policies
CE 5.1.A Bicycle Master Plan Vision
Provide for a network of active transportation facilities consistent with the vision in
the current Newport Beach Bicycle Master Plan.
CE 5.1.B Bicycle Network Implementation
Review and program discrete active transportation projects outlined in the current
Newport Beach Bicycle Master Plan in the annual Capital Improvement Program.
CE 5.1.1 Trail System
Promote construction of a comprehensive trail system as shown on Figure CE4 to
connect bicycle trails with hiking trails and transit routes. (Possible revisionsUpdated
figure in process)
(Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.2 Pedestrian Travel Mode Connectivity
Ensure all active transportation networks are linked and provide connectivity
between transit, transit centers, and other major land uses such as village areas,
commercial centers, activity nodes, recreation facilities, schools, parks, and
institutionsLink residential areas, schools, parks, and commercial centers so that
residents can travel within the community without driving. (Imp 16.11, 20.1)
CE 5.1.3 Pedestrian Improvements in New Development Projects
Require new development projects to include safe and attractive sidewalks,
walkways, and bike lanes in accordance with the Master Plan, and, if feasible,
trails. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.4 Linkages to Citywide Trail System and Neighborhoods
Require developers to construct links to the planned trail system, adjacent
areas, and communities where appropriate. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.5 Bikeway System
Cooperate with state, federal, county, and local agencies to coordinate
bikeways and trails throughout the region. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.6 Bicycle Supporting Facilities
Incorporate separate bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the design plans for
new streets and highways and, where feasible, in the plans for improving DRAFT192
Circulation Element
Newport Beach General Plan 7-21
existing roads. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.X Bicycle Supporting Facilities
Require bicycle facilities such as bike racks, bike stations, or lockers according
to national standards for long-term and short-term bicycle utilization on City
property and with new development and encourage the addition of such
bicycle facilities within existing development.
CE 5.1.7 Bicycle Safety
Provide for safety of bicyclists, equestrians, and pedestrians by adhering to
current national standards and uniform practices. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.8 Bicycle Conflicts with Vehicles and Pedestrians
Minimize conflict points among motorized traffic, pedestrians, e-bikes, and
conventional bicycle traffic. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.9 Integrated Bicycle Improvements
Coordinate community bicycle and pedestrian facilities in a citywide network
for continuity of travel. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.10 Bicycle Trail Signage
Develop and implement a uniform signing program to assist the public in
locating, recognizing, and utilizing public bikeways and trails. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.11 School Access
Work with schools to promote walking, biking, safe drop-off, and other
improvements. (Imp 14.2, 16.11)
CE 5.1.12 Pedestrian Street Crossings
Continue to Iimplement improved pedestrian crossings in key high volume
areas such as Corona Del Mar, Mariners’ Mile, West Newport, Airport Area,
Newport Center/Fashion Island, and the Balboa Peninsula. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.13 Overhead Pedestrian Street Crossings
Consider overhead pedestrian crossings in areas where pedestrian use limits the
efficiency of the roadway or signalized intersection and/or where an overhead
crossing provides for improved pedestrian safety. (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.14 Newport Harbor Trails and Walkways
Develop and implement a long-range plan for public trails and walkways to access
all appropriate commercial areas of the harbor, as determined to be physically and
economically feasible including the following:
a. Extension of the Lido Marina Village boardwalk across all of the waterfront
commercial properties in Lido Village
b. Provide a continuous waterfront walkway along the Rhine Channel,
connecting Cannery Village and McFadden Square waterfront commercial areas
with Las Arenas Beach at 19th Street DRAFT193
Circulation Eleme n t
7-22 Newport Beach General Plan
c. Provide a walkway connecting the Lido Village area with Mariners’ Mile
d. Provide a continuous walkway along the Mariners’ Mile waterfront from the
Coast Highway/Newport Boulevard Bridge to the Balboa Bay Club (Policy HB
6.2) (Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.15 Equestrian Trails
Maintain the existing equestrian trail system in Santa Ana Heights (Figure CE5).
(Imp 16.11)
CE 5.1.16 Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety
Provide for the safety of bicyclists and pedestrians through provision of adequate
facilities, including review of locations where sidewalk use by bicyclists is
appropriate, consideration of separate facilities for e-bikes or other semi-
motorized modes, and maintenance and construction of extra sidewalk width
where feasible. (Imp 16.11)
Goa l
CE 5.2
Enhanced and maintained public water transportation services and expanded public water
transportation uses and land support facilities. (Policy HB 6.5)
Policies
CE 5.2.1 Marine Terminals
Coordinate the location of marine terminals with other components of the
transportation system to ensure convenient multi-modal access and adequate
parking. (Policy HB 6.6) (Imp 16.12)
CE 5.2.2 Expanded Water Transportation Modes
Promote opportunities to expand water transportation modes, such as water
based shuttle services and water taxis. (Policy HB 6.7) (Imp 16.12) DRAFT194
Circulation Element
Newport Beach General Plan 7-23
Transportation Systems Management (TSM)/Travel Demand Management (TDM)
Emerging Technology
Goa l
CE 6.1
An efficient circulation system through the use of transportation systems management.
Policies
CE 6.1.1 Traffic Signals
Improve traffic signal operations by optimizing signal timing, interconnecting
signalized intersections along arterial streets, and installing computerized
master traffic signal control systems in intensively utilized areas. (Imp 16.7)
CE 6.1.2 Intelligent Transportation Systems
Explore and implement intelligent transportation system and infrastructure
improvements which will reduce peak hour trafficimprove circulation system
performance from that forecast in this Element. (Imp16.4, 16.7
CE 6.1.3 Coordination with Adjacent Jurisdictions
Coordinate operations with adjacent jurisdictions to enhance the efficiency
of inter-jurisdictional roadway system operations. (Imp 14.1, 14.3)
CE 6.1.X1 Rideshare Vehicles
Monitor the volume and proliferation of on demand rideshare services (e.g.,
Uber and Lyft) and respond with appropriate level of design guidance and
regulation of curb side uses (including loading zone) and parking lot
utilization.
CE 6.1.X2 Autonomous, Connected, and Future Vehicle Technology
Monitor the development of new vehicle technology and associated
community based infrastructure. Plan for the deployment of new vehicle
technology through annual budgeting process and capital improvement
programming process.
CE 6.1.X3 Wayfinding Technology
Monitor and communicate with wayfinding technology providers (e.g., Waze
and Google Maps) to reduce routing of traffic through neighborhoods.
CE 6.1.X4 Parking Technology
Consider deployment of parking app technology that identifies available
parking spaces and reduces vehicle circulation and congestion related to
searching for parking spaces. DRAFT195
Circulation Eleme n t
7-24 Newport Beach General Plan
Climate Change
Goa l
CE 6.2
Promote strategies to reduce the use of internal combustion passenger cars and the attendant greenhouse
gas emissions.
Policies
CE 6.2.X1 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis
Follow the analysis methodology for vehicle miles traveled according to the
Newport Beach VMT thresholds policy and as required in Senate Bill 743 and
the revised California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.
CE 6.2.X2 VMT Mitigation Measures
Require implementation of CEQA project related VMT mitigation measures
when warranted and monitor reductions in VMT from new development.
CE 6.2.X3 Regional VMT Mitigation Measures
Promote the development of regional VMT mitigation in order to simplify
the CEQA process and enhance the effectiveness of VMT and GHG
reduction strategies.
CE 6.2.1 Alternative Transportation Modes and Practices
Promote and encourage the use of alternative transportation modes, such as
ridesharing, carpools, vanpools, public transit, bicycles, and walking, and
telecommuting programs; and provide facilities that support such alternate
modes. (Imp 16.8, 16.11) through the planning and development of a Complete
Streets master plan and design guide.
CE 6.2.2 Support Facilities for Alternative Modes
Require new development projects to provide facilities commensurate with
development type and intensity to support alternative modes, such as preferential
parking for carpools, bike racks, bike stations, bicycle lockers, showers, commuter
information areas, rideshare vehicle loading areas, water transportation docks, and
bus stop improvements. (Imp 16.8, 16.11)
CE 6.2.X4 Public Right of Way Curbside Management
Review areas with commercial uses (such as retail, restaurant, and hospitality) to
incorporate strategies to accommodate novel use of curb side right of way to
reduce passenger car use through drop-off or valet and accommodate rideshare
as well as delivery activities where appropriate.
DRAFT196
Circulation Element
Newport Beach General Plan 7-25
CE 6.2.3 Project Site Design Supporting Alternative Modes
Encourage increased use of public transportation by requiring project site designs
that facilitate the use of public transportation and walking. (Imp 16.8, 16.11)
CE 6.2.X5 Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Stations
Install additional EV charging stations on City properties, support existing private
development to add new EV charging stations, and require EV charging stations
be installed as part of new development.DRAFT197
Parking
Goa l
CE 7.1
An adequate supply of convenient parking throughout the City.
Policies
CE 7.1.1 Required Parking
Require that new development provide adequate, convenient parking for
residents, guests, business patrons, and visitors. (Imp 16.10)
CE 7.1.X1 Parking Considerations of Rideshare Vehicles
Develop parking demand statistics that consider the efficiency of rideshare services
and the potential for reduction in parking requirements.
CE 7.1.2 Parking In-Lieu Fees
Establish an in-lieu parking fee that the City may require to be paid when a
development is not able to provide required parking. (Imp 16.10)
CE 7.1.3 Funding of Shared Parking Facilities
Use in-lieu fees and other funds to develop public shared parking facilities in areas
with inadequate parking supply. Priority shall be given to spending fees in areas
that will benefit those who contributed the fees. (Imp 16.10)
CE 7.1.4 Expanded Parking in Corona del Mar
Permit conversion of Corona Del Mar residential lots adjacent to commercial
areas and commercial lots for parking to support commercial uses. Encourage
continued use of existing parking on residential zoned lots, as well as existing
shared parking lots. (Imp 2.1, 8.1, 8.2, 24.1)
CE 7.1.X2 Parking Consolidation
Evaluate the potential to consolidate underutilized parcels to create parking
districts and to construct areawide parking hubs potentially relieving
individual parcels of some of their parking requirements.
CE 7.1.5 Avon Street Municipal Parking Lot Relocation
Consider relocation of the Avon Street municipal lot to better serve
commercial uses in Mariners’ Mile. (Imp 2.1, 16.10)
CE 7.1.6 Public Use of Private Parking Facilities
Encourage the use of commercial, office, and institutional parking areas for
use as public parking to serve coastal recreational areas during weekends and
holidays, in conjunction with public transit or shuttles where appropriate. (Imp
8.1, 8.2, 16.10)
DRAFT198
Circulation Element
Newport Beach General Plan 7-27
CE 7.1.7 Shared Parking Facilities
Consider allowing shared parking in mixed use and pedestrian oriented areas
throughout the City. (Imp 2.1, 8.1, 8.2, 16.10)
CE 7.1.8 Parking Configuration
Site and design new development to avoid use of parking configurations or
management programs that are difficult to maintain and enforce. (Imp 2.1, 7.1,
8.1)
CE 7.1.9 Parking Requirements for Pedestrian-Oriented and Local-Serving Uses
Consider revised parking requirements for small scale neighborhood serving
commercial uses in areas that derive most of their trade from walk-in
business, especially where on-street or other public parking is available. (Imp
2.1, 8.1, 8.2)
CE 7.1.10 Parking for Marine Recreational Users
Provide adequate parking as necessary in the vicinity of visitor serving marine
uses, including marinas, water transportation terminals, boat ramps, as well as
parking suitable for service vehicles in commercial marinas and berthing
areas. (Imp 16.12)
CE 7.1.11 Curb Cuts
Require new development to minimize curb cuts to protect on-street parking
spaces. Close curb cuts to create on street parking spaces wherever feasible.
(Imp 2.1, 7.1, 8.1)
CE 7.1.12 Alley Access
Require alley access to parking areas for all new development in areas where
alley access exists. (Imp 2.1, 8.1)
CE 7.1.13 Up-to-Date Parking Requirements
Periodically review and update off-street parking requirements in the Municipal
Code Section to account for changes in technology and commuter behavior and
ensure that new development provides off-street parking sufficient to serve
approved uses. (Imp 8.1, 8.2)
Goa l
CE 7.2
An efficiently operated parking system.
Policies
CE 7.2.1 Parking Management
Develop parking management programs for areas with inadequate parking. (Imp
16.10)
DRAFT199
CE 7.2.X1 Parking Technology
Support the development of new technologies, including parking related apps to
promote wayfinding, parking availability, and parking fee collections in an efficient
manner.
CE 7.2.X2 Parking Pricing
Periodically review and update parking fees and rates at on-street locations and
off-street parking lots operated by the City.
CE 7.2.2 Parking Signage
Provide improved parking information and signage. (Imp 16.10)
CE 7.2.3 Shared Valet Service
Explore the feasibility of shared valet parking programs in areas with high parking
demand and less conveniently located parking facilities, such as Mariners’ Mile and
McFadden Square. (Imp 16.10)
DRAFT200
Circulation Element
Newport Beach General Plan 7-29
Transportation Funding
Goa l
CE 8.1
Adequate funding for needed transportation infrastructure and operations including support of measures
for outside funding of transportation improvements.
Policies
CE 8.1.1 Transportation User and Benefit Fees
Support legislation to increase transportation user and benefit fees, and to index
such fees to keep pace with inflation, in order to provide the additional revenues
for needed transportation facilities and services. (Imp 7.3)
CE 8.1.2 State Highway Revenues
Support legislation to increase state highway revenues as needed to maintain and
rehabilitate the existing state highway system and to match all available federal
highway funding. (Imp 14.9)
CE 8.1.3 Innovative Transportation Funding
Support the evaluation and implementation of innovative transportation
financing mechanisms such as local tax increment districts, benefit
assessment districts, and joint development and use of transportation centers.
(Imp 31.1)
CE 8.1.4 Local Street and Highway Revenues
Support measures to increase local street and highway revenues as needed to
fund all road reconstruction, operation, and maintenance cost. (Imp 7.3, 20.1)
CE 8.1.5 Comprehensive Funding Program
Support measures to develop and implement a continuing funding program,
including private sector participation and an equitable fare structure, to fund
the construction, operation, and maintenance of transit facilities and services.
(Imp 7.2, 7.3, 20.1)
CE 8.1.6 Annual Budgeting for Improvements
Annually review and consider budgeting for projects contributing to
completion of the Master Plan of Streets and Highways. (Imp 7.3, 30.1)
CE 8.1.7 Fair Share Fee Ordinance
Periodically review the Fair Share Fee Ordinance, reassess the unfunded cost
of required improvements, and adjust the required Fair Share Fees as
appropriate. (Imp 7.2)
DRAFT201
CE 8.1.8 Roadway Improvements Funding
Fund costs of major roadway facility and intersection improvements through
gas tax revenues, federal, state, and county grants, and City ordinances to
avoid burdening the General Fund to the extent that this is possible. (Imp 7.2,
7.3, 30.2)
CE 8.1.9 Right-of-Way Dedication
Require the dedication of needed right-of-way in conjunction with approval
of subdivision maps or other discretionary approvals. (Imp 1.1)
CE 8.1.10 Development Requirements
Require development to provide the needed roadway improvements adjacent
to a site, commensurate with project impact and in accordance with the
Master Plan of Streets and Highways. (Imp 16.3)
CE 8.1.11 Joint Funding with Adjoining Jurisdictions
Pursue joint funding of improvements in areas (such as the Airport Area)
where traffic growth and/or needed improvements are demonstrably based
upon traffic contributions or improvements that are a joint responsibility of
Newport Beach and one or more adjacent jurisdictions/agencies. (Imp 14.1)
CE 8.1.12 Measure M Restrictions
Measure M sales tax revenues shall not be used to replace private developer
funding that has been committed for any project or normal subdivision
obligations. (Imp 16.2)
CE 8.1.13 Transportation Improvement or Special Assessment District
Establish a transportation improvement or special assessment district to fund
improvements needed in the Airport Area. (Imp 31.1)
DRAFT202
From:dave@earsi.com
To:Planning Commissioners; Jurjis, Seimone; Avery, Brad; Campbell, Jim
Subject:Draft Circulation Elements Update - Comments
Date:Tuesday, March 16, 2021 3:25:04 PM
Attachments:Draft Circulation Element Update Comments 3-16-21.pdf
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
content is safe.
Hi,
Attached are my comments/recommendations following review of the Draft Circulation Element
Updates
Cheers,
Dave
David J. Tanner
223 62nd Street
Newport Beach, CA 92663
949 646-8958 home
949 233-0895 cell
Notice of Confidentiality:
This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the address(s) named herein
and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended
recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of
this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in
error, please notify me by e-mail by replying to this message and permanently delete the original
and any copy of any email and any printout thereof.
203
Draft Circulation Element Text
Comments, March 16, 2021
David Tanner Page 1 of 6
General
Top Priorities
Satisfying the state mandated housing requirement is the predominant factor driving the direction of the
Housing Element/General Plan update. The City has chosen to proceed with the Housing Element and
Circulation Element updates first, followed by the Land Use other and remaining Elements. In updating the
Housing and Circulation Elements the City needs to incorporate additional mandates beyond accommodating
RHNA. The direction the Country is going, is to reduce GHG emissions to reduce mankind’s impact on climate
change. To become carbon neutral by 2050, if not sooner. The Country’s Climate change polices are largely
being driven by California law (SB32). These policies mandate California reduce its statewide GHG emissions
to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. Local Governments must do their fair share. Federal and state funds will
be allocated to this goal. Achieving the state GHG reduction mandate and achieving state RHNA/housing
affordability mandate should be the top priorities of the General Plan Update.
The existing General Plan vision includes a significant reduction of ADT. Combining reductions in ADT, VMT
and GHG emissions city‐wide, should be top priorities of the City’s Housing and Circulation Element Updates.
2030 Vision
Circumstances has changed significantly since the last General Plan update. The City needs to project a vision
of the City in 2030 to serve as a blueprint for this General Plan Update. What will the City’s population be?
Where will the City’s population growth be distributed? How many additional cars will be on the City’s
roadways? What percentage of the population will be driving electric vehicles? What will the City’s circulation
needs be given the mandated reduction in total VMT of 40% below 1990 levels?1 What will the City’s carbon
footprint be? What is Newport Beach’s plan to reach carbon neutrality?
California Air Resources Board 2000‐2018 GHG Inventory (2020 Edition)
1 A good example of a Climate Action Plan is the City of San Luis Obispo:
https://www.slocity.org/home/showpublisheddocument?id=27835
204
Draft Circulation Element Text
Comments, March 16, 2021
David Tanner Page 2 of 6
We need to project these changes, not only in the City, but in the region? What types of measures will local
governments within SCAG implement to achieve these Housing, GHG and VMT reduction mandates? How will
the region’s population growth impact the City?
Simply stated, we need to establish a 2030 Vision of where and how people and goods will move from one
place to another, how the City is going to accommodate state mandated housing/population growth, maintain
a jobs housing balance and protect, preserve and enhance where feasible, our quality of life, health and safety.
Based on the 2030 Vision, we should craft the Housing Element, Circulation Element and other General Plan
Elements to be internally consistent. Without the Vision, we have no blueprint!
Top priority – Establish the City 2030 Vision now. When the City has a draft “2030 Vision”, it should be shared
with the public for comment and later adopted by the City Council.
Implementation
Operation Warp Speed – we only have 9 years to achieve the 2030 Vision mandates. We cannot kick this can
down the road!
Draft Circulation Element Comments
Assumptions – Please provide the public the assumption used in the Draft Circulation Element.
Circulation Element Graphics – Please provide the public with all Circulation Element graphics (CE1‐5 + any
additional graphics)? The Circulation Element Graphics should identify location of all future bridge locations.
House Cleaning ‐ We should be going through the Circulation Element eliminating policies that are no longer
necessary, have been fully implemented or are infeasible.
Comments on Specific Policies
Policy
CE 1.1.3 Levels of Service Related to Community Character
Maintain and enhance where feasible ….
Add new Policies
CE 1.1.4
Continue to implement measures, such as special traffic signal timing, to reduce traffic wait times caused by
Pacific Coast Highway traffic synchronization on local cross street for persons living along and around the
beach and bay, as well as visitors.
CE ___ Reduce Citywide ADT per GP (Source: GP Introduction Chapter)
CE ___ Reduce Citywide total VMT to help achieve state GHG emission reduction mandates 40% below 1990
levels by 2030.
205
Draft Circulation Element Text
Comments, March 16, 2021
David Tanner Page 3 of 6
Add New Goal
CE ___ Traffic Calming and Expression of Community Character
Reduce citywide Average Daily Traffic (ADT) by 28,920 trips each day over the life of the plan. (Source: GP
Introduction Chapter)
Add new Policies to achieve this goal.
CE __
CE 1.2.2 Shuttle Service
Encourage and maintain and enhance where feasible….
CE 2.1.1 Level of Service Standards
A. Level of Service (LOS) “D” “C” throughout the City, unless otherwise noted (to be achieved by reduction of
VMT, land planning (requiring deliveries at non‐peak hour, encourage nighttime businesses, shuttles, mass
transit, complete streets, use of alternate forms of transportation, managed pick‐ups and deliveries, etc.)
CE 2.1.2 Street and Highway Network
Construct Update the circulation system described on the map entitled Newport Beach Circulation Element‐
Master Plan of Streets and Highways shown in Figure CE1 and Figure CE2 (cross‐section). (Imp 14.9, 16.3)
Develop an updated plan for WCH. which includes traffic calming improvements and complete street features
for WCH.
CE 2.2.4 Driveway and Access Limitations
Improve pedestrian and vehicular safety at existing access points on WHC along Mariners Mile and WCH.
CE 2.3.1 Coast Highway Ownership
Pursue ownership of Coast Highway throughout Newport Beach, as opportunities arise. Work with Caltrans
to update Coast Highway Master Plan to incorporate traffic calming improvements, complete street features,
reduce ADT and VMT within the Mariners’ Mile and West Newport consistent with the City’s vision
(incorporate active transportation or electric vehicle improvements that reduce passenger car use, offer
mobility choice, enhance recreation and community health and pedestrian safety). Master Plan of Streets
and Highways and the OCTA Master Plan of Arterial Highways and to provide the City with more opportunities
to increase operational efficiencies. (Imp 2.1, 14.9)
Efforts to widen PCH through Corona del Mar and Mariners Mile should be abandoned!
206
Draft Circulation Element Text
Comments, March 16, 2021
David Tanner Page 4 of 6
CE 3.1.X Traffic from Adjoining Communities
The City of Newport Beach shall continue to monitor land development applications in adjacent communities
and encourage coordination on land development projects that affect traffic and mobility in Newport Beach.
The idea is to discourage development in other cities from impacting Newport Beach street segments
experiencing poor LOS. Not just monitor and coordinate. This is going to become a greater problem
with the area‐wide implementation of RHNA.
Work with adjacent counties to reduce ADT impacting Newport Beach street segments experiencing
poor LOS through use of buses, shuttles and carpooling. The City should work with SCAG to reduce
the traffic volume on the 91 Freeway headed to Newport Beach!
CE 3.1.4 Regional Traffic Mitigation
Mitigate reduce regional traffic congestion.
We want Environmental Justice. Mitigation measures based on objective criteria that are effective and
enforceable with protocols for ensuring measures represent actual VMT and GHG emission reductions that
would achieve the goals of AB 32
CE 3.1.5 19th Street Bridge Santa Ana River Future Mobility Alternatives
…. without disproportionate impacts on Newport Beach including Coast Highway ….
CE 4.1.4 Land Use Densities Supporting Public Transit
Accommodate residential densities sufficient to support transit patronage, especially in mixed use areas such
as the Airport Area. (Imp 2.1) (this should remain and be coordinated with locations for high density RHNA
housing)
CE 5.1.A Bicycle Master Plan Vision
Provide for a network of active transportation facilities consistent with the vision in the current Newport
Beach Bicycle Master Plan.
Please explain why is this new Policy needed?
CE 5.1.B Bicycle Network Implementation
Review and program discrete active transportation projects outlined in the current Newport Beach Bicycle
Master Plan in the annual Capital Improvement Program.
Please explain why is this new Policy needed?
CE 5.1.2 Pedestrian Travel Mode Connectivity
Ensure all active transportation networks are safely linked …..
207
Draft Circulation Element Text
Comments, March 16, 2021
David Tanner Page 5 of 6
CE 5.1.X Bicycle Supporting Facilities
Consider adding electric charging stations?
CE 5.1.12 Pedestrian Street Crossings
Continue to implement improved pedestrian crossings in coordination with traffic calming measures in key
high‐volume areas such as Corona Del Mar, Mariners’ Mile, West Newport, Airport Area, Newport
Center/Fashion Island, and the Balboa Peninsula. (Imp 16.11)
(This should be in coordination with traffic calming measures. The General Plan requires a specific reduction
in ADT. It does not say that cars have the ROW over pedestrians. Roads should not force people to use
bridges! This is not a one‐sided fix! Cars, trucks, electric bikes should be routed to avoid high‐volume
pedestrian crossings)
CE 5.1.13 Overhead Pedestrian Street Crossings
Consider overhead pedestrian crossings in commercial and business areas outside the coastal zone and
residential areas where pedestrian use limits the efficiency of the roadway or signalized intersection and/or
where an overhead crossing provides for improved pedestrian safety. (Imp 16.11)
Pedestrians have the ROW. Traffic calming measures should take precedent and not allow vehicles to
endanger pedestrian safety particularly within residential areas and the coastal zone. The reduction of ADT
in the existing General Plan and state mandates for VMT/GHG reduction should be integrated into the
planning process for the Circulation Element Update.
CE 5.1.16 Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety
Provide for the safety of bicyclists and pedestrians through provision of adequate facilities, including review
of locations where sidewalk use by bicyclists is appropriate, consideration of separate facilities for e‐bikes or
other semimotorized modes, and maintenance and construction of extra sidewalk width where feasible. (Imp
16.11)
Mention bicycle integration into complete streets and trails?
CE 6.1.X2 Autonomous, Connected, and Future Vehicle Technology
Monitor the development of new vehicle technology and associated community‐based infrastructure. Plan
for the deployment of new vehicle technology through annual budgeting process and capital improvement
programming process.
Consider adding language to explore integrating autonomous use of drones.
Goal CE6‐2
Sounds good, but! It should contain objective enforceable standard to achieve the state mandates.
CE 6.2.X1 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis
208
Draft Circulation Element Text
Comments, March 16, 2021
David Tanner Page 6 of 6
Follow the analysis methodology for vehicle miles traveled according to the Newport Beach VMT thresholds
policy and as required in Senate Bill 743 and the revised California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines.
CE 6.2.1
Telecommuting is not an alternative form of transportation. What is the ADT & VMT reduction target for a
complete streets master plan? Otherwise, this will be just another study that does nothing.
CE 6.2.X4
What does “novel” mean? There should be a define objective performance standard.
CE 7.1.X2 Parking Consolidation
Evaluate the potential to consolidate underutilized parcels to create parking districts and to construct
areawide parking hubs potentially relieving individual parcels of some of their parking requirements.
No! this will encourage additional urban infill with insufficient parking.
Yes, to relieving existing parking shortfalls.
CE 7.1.5 Avon Street Municipal Parking Lot Relocation
Consider relocation of the Avon Street municipal lot to better serve commercial uses in Mariners’ Mile. (Imp
2.1, 16.10)
Delete this Policy. Why would we want to relocate this parking lot? Where would it be replaced.
Circumstances have changed. This parking lot would be used for high density in‐fill housing which is not
wanted! This will not be allowed by the LCP/Coastal Commission!
CE 7.2.X2 Parking Pricing Periodically review and update parking fees and rates at on‐street locations and off‐
street parking lots operated by the City.
Environmental Justice requirements need to be incorporated.
CE 7.2.3 Shared Valet Service
Explore the feasibility of shared valet parking programs in areas with high parking demand and less
conveniently located parking facilities, such as Mariners’ Mile and McFadden Square. (Imp 16.10)
Delete this policy. If this could have been done, it would have been done. It is not feasible.
Goal
CE 8.1
Adequate funding for needed transportation infrastructure and operations including support of measures for
outside funding of transportation improvements. Why are changes needed? What has changed?
209
Initial Draft of the
Circulation Element
Update
Planning Commission Study Session
March 18, 2021
210
PC Review
September 17, 2020
•Outlined PC’s possible oversight role
October 13, 2020
•Council delegates responsibility to PC
October 22, 2020
•Commissioner Koetting selected as liaison to HEUAC
November 19, 2020
•Circulation Element 101 presentation
All Other PC Meetings
•Provided status reports 211
Virtual Public Workshops
November 23, 2020
•Circulation Element 101
December 15, 2020
•Themes Workshop #1
December 16, 2020
•Themes Workshop #2
February 10, 2021
•Visioning Workshop
212
Summary of Updates
•Updated narrative
•92 existing Policies under 8 themes
•62 existing Policies proposed unchanged
•30 existing Policies updated to address changed
conditions or vision
•22 new Policies
4213
Key Unchanged Policies
•Comprehensive/Integrated Transportation System
•Support Public Transit Services
•Consistency with OCTA Master Plan
•Pedestrian, Bicycle, Equestrian Trail System
•Traffic Signal Operations & Coordination
•Adequate/Convenient Parking -New Development
•Support Increased Outside Funding
5214
Various Updated Policies
•Support added regional transit in higher-density areas
•Improve connectivity to places of interest
•Minimize conflict w/ new modes of transit (e.g., e-bikes)
•Promote and encourage telecommuting programs
•Require bicycle amenities in new development
•Review parking requirements in NBMC
•Santa Ana River mobility alternatives
6215
Legal Mandates & Regional Plans
•Complete Streets Act of 2008 –Multimodal
transportation network meeting needs of all users for safe
and convenient travel
•SB 743 –CEQA impacts assessment based on VMT
•Long-range plan (Connect SoCal) –2020-2045 Regional
Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy
balances future mobility and housing needs with economic,
environmental and public health goals
7216
New Policies
•Climate Change & Emerging Technology
•Complete Streets Master Plan
•Study pilot shuttle system connecting villages w/in city
•Safe System Approach for implementing safety
projects
•Construction Management Plans for new development
•Monitor land development projects in adjacent
jurisdictions
8217
New Policies (Cont.)
•Incorporate current Bicycle Master Plan and program
active transportation projects
•Require bicycle facilities w/ new development and
encourage in existing development
•Monitor rideshare (Uber, Lyft) use/design for curbside
improvements –loading zones
•Monitor autonomous vehicles and plan infrastructure
•Communicate with providers (Waze, Google Maps) to
reduce routing traffic through neighborhoods 218
•Parking app technology that identifies available spaces
•Follow VMT methodology approved by Council in 2020
•Strategize to incorporate curbside right-of-way for
rideshare drop-off or valet, and delivery zones
•Install more EV charging stations on City property,
require stations be installed w/ new development
•Evaluate consolidating underutilized parcels to create
areawide parking hubs
10
New Policies (Cont.)
219
Next Steps
•April 5 –Circulation
Element Virtual Workshop
•April 30 –Deadline to
provide comments on draft
•May –City Council review
•Late Spring/Early Summer
–Revised document for
review
11220
Questions?
Thank you!
Tony Brine, City Traffic Engineer
Tony Petros, LSA Associates
GPUpdate@newportbeachca.gov
221
INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE222
Attachment No. PC 4
Newport, Together Public Workshop
Reports
223
INTENTIONALLY BLANK PAGE224
1Circulation Element 101 Virtual Workshop: Workshop Summary
Circulation Element 101 - Virtual Workshop
Held On: November 23, 2020
After Action Report
Prepared by Kearns & West December 28, 2020
225
2Circulation Element 101 Virtual Workshop: Workshop Summary
Introduction
On November 23, 2020, the City of Newport Beach (City) hosted the first Circulation Element update
workshop. This workshop oriented community members to the Circulation Element update outreach
process and topics. It provided an overview of the the existing Newport Beach General Plan Circulation
Element with the goal of helping the broader community understand its various components. The
workshop also provided information about when, where, and how community members can get
more information and provide feedback on the Newport Beach Circulation Element update.
Workshop Objectives
The workshop had two objectives. The first was to provide an introduction to the existing Circulation
Element of the General Plan Update, focusing on key themes and the reason for the update. The
second objective was to provide information on additional opportunities for continued community
engagement throughout the update process.
Getting the Word Out
Information about the workshop was shared through the City’s email distribution list, on social
media platforms, as an item on the City’s calendar, and as an announcement on the project website
(NewportTogether.com). It was also announced at Planning Commission and was shared at the
November 10, 2020 City Council meeting.
Workshop Format: Date, Time, Platform, and Attendance Summary
The workshop took place on November 23, 2020 from 6:00 – 8:00 p.m. via Zoom.
Attendance Summary:
• Total registration of 56 participants
• Total attendance of 45 participants
• Three call-in participants
• Forty-two web-based participants
Getting the Word Out
Information about the workshop was shared through the City’s distribution email, on social media
platforms, as an item on the City’s event calendar, and was announced through an electronic
newsletter to community members who are registered on NewportTogether.com.
Workshop Input Opportunities
The format was designed to allow participants the ability to submit comments and questions via
the chat box during the entire workshop. After a presentation was given by City staff to provide
an overview of the existing (or current) Circulation Element, participants were able to raise their
hand and be unmuted by the project team to ask questions verbally as well as provide comments
and questions in the chat during the community discussion session. Each participant was allotted 3
minutes to provide their comment or question. The facilitator also raised questions submitted via the
chat box to the project team.
226
3Circulation Element 101 Virtual Workshop: Workshop Summary
Online Input Opportunities: Newport, Together
The Newport, Together Circulation Element workshop page includes recordings from the workshop
and virtual tools to gather input from community members, guided by the following questions:
• What is important to you about the following themes?
• Are there any themes missing from this list?
Participant comments and questions will be continuously provided to the project team.
Workshop Activities
The workshop included activities to gauge participants’ understanding of and interest in the Circulation
Element. Participants responded to two poll questions within Zoom about their familiarity with the
Circulation Element and themes of interest to them. A total of 50 poll responses were submitted.
Results for Poll 1 showed that 78% of participants had minimal familiarity with the Circulation Element.
This suggests that future workshops should consider providing information that is less technical and
more accessible for everyone regardless of their familiarity with the Circulation Element.
Poll 2 focused on participant interest in future discussion of key themes. The three themes with the
highest percentage of responses were roadway system (29%), regional transportation (22%), and
alternative transportation modes (21%). While these only represent a sample of the themes of interest,
the results provide direction for future workshops. The project team will respond by expanding on
these themes in future workshops and will continue to seek understanding of community interests
with the purpose of creating a Circulation Element update that is responsive to community input.
Expert - I practically wrote the thing
Very familiar
Fairly familiar, I understand most of it
I've looked through it, but don’t quite understand it all
Barely, but I'm aware
Not at all
33%
34%
22%
11%
Expert - I practically wrote the thing 0%
Very Familiar 0%
Poll 1
227
4Circulation Element 101 Virtual Workshop: Workshop Summary
Major Themes from Public Questions and Comments
A major portion of the workshop focused on gathering verbal input from participants. Major themes
from this discussion are outlined below:
• Participants noted an interest in understanding the City’s coordination with
adjacent cities and regional transportation agencies, including how these groups
impact the Circulation Element update for Newport Beach.
• A number of participants noted that the City should emphasize safety for bicyclists
and pedestrians.
• One participant asked for clarification on an expected “pandemic effect” involving
tele-work and the potential influence on traffic circulation.
• Questions were raised about emerging transportation modes and the way that these
are being incorporated into the Circulation Element, specifically shared micro-mobility.
• A commenter expressed concern over the relationship between housing units being
proposed as part of the Housing Element and mandates from the Circulation Element
to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT).
Roadway System
Alternative Transporation Modes
Regional Transportation
Parking
Mobility
Public Transportation
Something Else
Transportation Funding
Transportation System Management
22%
29%
21%
14%
Transportation Funding 0%
Transportation System Management 0%
Something Else 0%
7%7%
Poll 2
228
5Circulation Element 101 Virtual Workshop: Workshop Summary
Appendix A
Nov 23 Circulation Element Virtual Workshop Chat
Taylor York (Technical Support):
Welcome to the Newport Beach Circulation Element Update 101. If you have any technical questions or issues, use this chat
function, and we will try to help you resolve them.
Taylor York (Technical Support):
Welcome to the Newport Beach Circulation Element Update 101. If you have any technical questions or issues, use this chat
function, and we will try to help you resolve them.
Susan Eaton: Park Newport - Sunset from my balcony
Karen Tringali: Karen Tringali Cameo CDM … my living room
Jonathan Langford: Lookout Point, CdM!
Susan De Santis: Susan De Santis - Inspiration Point on Ocean Ave
Taylor York (Technical Support):
Technical Support: Hello, everyone. If you have any technical issues during today’s webinar, please send me Technical
Support a private message describing your issue. I will help diagnose the problem.
Does the VMT metric serve any purpose other than promoting densification? I am not sure how they measure it, but I
assume it is a function of how long the roads are and the average traffic.
Jenna Tourje, Facilitator: Thanks Sam - we’ve marked your question and will ask it during the Discussion time
Sam Shams: ok thank you!
Sam Shams: Its pretty impressive how we can move that many cars, but I do notice the green lights on macarthur stay
on for quite a while.
Sam Shams: I would like to mention that the bike lane can be improved between Dover and the 55 on PCH. That is kind
of the one area I am familiar with that kind of feels like you have to bike on the road a bit, and often cars are driving quite
fast on that stretch.
Jenna Tourje, Facilitator: thanks Sam!
Karen Tringali: we have made good strides in creating recreational biking safety but realistically is this a commumity
where cycling will be a mode of transportation for its residents
P. Matheis: Does this information suggest that the City does coordinate with Costa Mesa and Irvine on traffic signal
operations? At what level does this occur?
Nancy Scarbrough: The bicycle plan should consider the new types of bikes and skateboards that use electric motors.
229
6Circulation Element 101 Virtual Workshop: Workshop Summary
They complicate bike lanes and traffic lanes as well.
Susan De Santis: How and when will the circulation element be coordinated with the Housing Opportunity areas/
sites in order to assess impacts on the circulation system?
Sam Shams: Yes good point Nancy, electric bikes are a definetly making an impact, not sure how to deal with that.
Sam Shams: Thank you!
Jim Kociuba: Will the regional transportation component in this circulation element address the problem of regional
traffic moving using Cliff Drive and 15th Street because of the Mariners Mile congestion?
Susan De Santis: At the point when the VMT has been calculated, how are the cumulative impacts assessed and
mitigation measures identified?
P. Matheis: Is there more information available about how the City coordinates than what was mentioned regarding
coordination between the city of Irvine and Newport Beach? Computer coordination, etc…?
Karen Tringali: Pedestrian safety is a huge issue with so many bikes ...manual and especially electric … which use sidewalks
instead of bike lanes that run directly parellel … especially east of CdM Village How will the CE address that?
Mary Ann Soden: I joined late so I apologize if this was addressed. How can this plan address the impacts of WAZE
and orher apps that send drivers through residential communities and not on the designated arteries like San Joaquin Hills
Rd. can you
Patrick Gormley: Who and how will changing lifestyles (especially working from home) and emerging transportation
trends guide and determine the Circulation Element outcome?
Karen Tringali: But Tony there is no enforcement …
P. Matheis: Is there an expected “pandemic effect” involving telle-work on the influence on traffic circulation?
Jim Kociuba: During this circulation element process, will we be given OCTA people we can contact directly concerning
regional traffic?
Mary Ann Soden: is this process a time to raise changing roadway access or ownership so that a community can
close their streets?
Mary Ann Soden: this is residential. thank you for the input.
Susan Eaton: I think I saw that the City was going to discuss more ability to use golf cart type vehicles. In the future,
won’t this type of vehicle be used more? What about ability to ride bikes - regular and electric on sidewalks? There are
areas like Jamboree, McArthur, San Joaquin Hills Road, etc. where it would be Much safer not not impact the small amount
of pedestrians.
P. Matheis: There seem to be a number of laws, ordinances, regulations, policies concerning the addition of the 4,800
housing unit. I have not heard a concrete understanding of the people responsible for developing this planning document
as to what they will follow when finalizing this plan.
Jim Kociuba: Concerning Mariners Mile, will the city reach out to the entire Newport Heights and Cliff Haven area so that
all views are expressed?
230
7Circulation Element 101 Virtual Workshop: Workshop Summary
Charles Klobe: What if there are few to no property owners willing to rezone their land for high density lower income
housing? What if the only landowners are in the airport area?
Charles Klobe: It is related tocirculation
Mary Ann Soden: sidewalks are for pedestrians.
Brad Avery: Another
P. Matheis: My observation is that MacArthur Boulevard is exceptionally wide in the Airport Area. Because I’ve
never seen a great deal of traffic in the Newport Beach portions of that street I’m curious how that happened when the
development in that area does not support such a wide boulevard.
Mary Ann Soden: Gov. is mandating new vehicles are electric or hydrogen. you need to factor that in.
Brad Avery: Thank you, great workshop, lots of effort ahead, we need more participation in these.
Jonathan Weiner: Nobody talks about REDUCING COMMUNTY GROWTH. This would greatly diminish the complexity
of the circulation and greenhouse problems.
Karen Tringali: Agreed Brad. Happy to see council members tonight. I hope planning commissioners will follow council
member leads
Karen Tringali: and attend as well
Charles Klobe: Bravo Jonathan. The city council majority is hellbent on accepting the HCD mandate for high density
lower income apartments. If the community understood this they would be screaming. Unfortunately most folks aren’t
watching this unfold.
Mary Ann Soden: what is the best way to track the City’s pushback on the RHNA number? that is significant for
circulation and housing.
P. Matheis: When I see bicycles on the West Oceanfront boardwalk I see the conflict between bicycles and pedestrians.
At times it seems like bicycles are treated as vehicles, yet on the boardwalk they closely interact with pedestrian traffic. Is
there a plan to limit bicycle traffic on the West Oceanfront boardwalk between 36th Street and E street?
Mary Ann Soden: sounds like CicLAvia in LA
Adriana Fourcher: What happened to the Greenlight initiative? Who is advocating for Santa Monica Blvd level of
traffic?
Mary Ann Soden: it is like planning for a marathon
Nancy Scarbrough: When considering alternate forms of transportation, specifically shifting toward bicycles, we need
to consider the aging population in our community. Folks that are 70, 80 and 90 cannot possibly get around on bikes. We
have a fairly large older population.
Mary Ann Soden: do you need community at the appeal?
Mary Ann Soden: if you need people on your the Zoom, say so. thanks.
231
8Circulation Element 101 Virtual Workshop: Workshop Summary
P. Matheis: One possible outcome of low profile development as in Orange County is the need for a vehicle because
that is how people travel to all of the locations that they need/want to visit each day. An alternative is taller building stock/
development with more retail options nearby. However, most folks do not seen amenable to this approach.
Debra Allen: I would like to follow up on Mary Ann’s comment and question about public participation at the appeal.
Our association would very much like to be involved and informed so we can assist in anyway possible.
Mary Ann Soden: that is correct in many locations other than the airport area
Charles Klobe: The appeal is to SCAG and there is little chance they will do anything. The public is frozen out, not by NB,
but by SCAG.
Adriana Fourcher: business owners in the airport area need to be included in the shaping of land use policy
Mary Ann Soden: once again a very important, and well facilitated, meeting. thank you.
Charles Klobe: Completely agree Adriana.
Adriana Fourcher: silent but not uninterested.
Sam Shams: thanks
232
1Circulation Element Themes - Virtual Workshop After Action Report
Circulation Element Themes - Virtual Workshop
After Action Report
Held On: December 15 & 16, 2020
Prepared by Kearns & West December 28, 2020
233
2Circulation Element Themes - Virtual Workshop After Action Report
Introduction
On December 15 & 16, 2020, the City of Newport Beach (City) hosted the second Circulation
Element update workshop. This workshop focused on themes in the current Newport Beach
General Plan Circulation Element. It built on previous workshop topics by further examining
components of the Circulation Element. It was part of a workshop series that will guide
participants and highlight participant input through the entirety of the Newport Beach Circulation
Element update process.
Workshop Objectives
The workshop had three objectives. The first was to provide an overview for each theme of the
current General Plan Circulation Element. The second was to seek input from the community on
the current themes and how they can better be addressed in the Circulation Element update. This
included identifying any missing topics of interest. The final objective was to provide information
on additional opportunities for continued community engagement throughout the update process.
Getting the Word Out
Information about the workshop was shared through the City’s distribution email, on social media
platforms, as an item on the City’s event calendar, and was announced through an electronic
newsletter to community members registered on NewportTogether.com. Additionally, City
staff made a presentation during the City’s December 3, 2020 Planning Commission meeting
highlighting the workshop and project website.
Workshop Format: Date, Time, Platform, and Attendance Summary
The workshop was conducted in two parts on December 15 & 16, 2020 from 6:00 – 8:00 p.m. via
Zoom.
December 15: Attendance Summary
• Total attendance of 42 participants
• One call-in participant
• 41 web-based participants
December 16: Attendance Summary
• Total attendance of 36 participants
• One call-in participant
• 36 web-based participants
Workshop Format
The workshop format included technical presentations by City staff followed by input from
participants via the chat box and a live comment section. City staff first presented each identified
theme and associated goals. During the live comment section, each participant was allotted 3
minutes to provide comments or questions. The facilitator also raised questions submitted via the
chat box to the project team. At the end of City staff presentations, participants were prompted by
a series of questions to think further about the Circulation Element themes and their applicability
to current travel behaviors and practices.
234
3Circulation Element Themes - Virtual Workshop After Action Report
Online Input Opportunities: Newport, Together
The Newport, Together Circulation Element workshop webpage includes recordings from the
workshop and virtual tools to gather input from community members, guided by the following
question:
• Are there any big picture themes that you would like to see discussed that are not
part of the existing Circulation Element?
Major Themes from Public Questions and Comments
The workshop was structured so that City staff could present on the Circulation Element themes
and participants could then provide input. Participants were able to provide commentary on the
various themes and goals and pose questions to staff. The following section highlights some of the
questions and comments shared during both workshops.
Participant Comment Themes
• Participants expressed interest in the inclusion of pathways through a community to
create livable neighborhoods safe for pedestrians and cyclists.
• It was suggested that the City should consider more electric vehicle charging citywide.
• Some participants expressed their concern over the relationship between local and
regional traffic related to residential neighborhoods becoming ancillary to highway
traffic.
• There was interest in knowing how technology will impact transportation needs and
how to consider technology’s impact on the current Circulation Element.
• Residents noted the importance of keeping a clear understanding of the City’s aging
demographic and its relation to the Circulation Element.
• Participants were interested in discussing the relationship between the Circulation
Element and community neighborhoods like Mariners Mile.
Participant Question Highlights
• What is the growth-inducing component of increasing public transportation?
• Does vehicle miles traveled (VMT) consider environmental damage caused by long
traffic backups on Coast Highway because of too few lanes in Mariners Mile?
• Does the current Circulation Element include AARP design guidelines to
accommodate seniors’ needs for wider sidewalks and curb cuts for wheelchairs
and walkers?
• Do roadway improvements equate to wider roadways and more pavement?
• Does the City’s intelligent transporation systems (ITS) allow interaction between
signals, speed limits, and smart cars?
• Does widening of larger arterial roadways to manage increased traffic consider the
impact of such a great expanse of pavement throughout the City?
• What are the circulation metrics used to measure and mitigate climate change? Is it
just VMT?
• What is the word “climate” intended to convey regarding circulation?
235
4Circulation Element Themes - Virtual Workshop After Action Report
December 15 Circulation Element Themes Virtual Workshop Chat
Taylor York (Technical Support): Welcome to the Newport Beach – Circulation Element Themes Workshop!
Technical Support: Hello, everyone. If you have any technical issues during today’s webinar, please send me Technical
Support a private message describing your issue. I will help diagnose the problem.
David Tanner: I’d like to see a Complete Streets Master Plan connecting Laguna Beach to Huntington Beach and beyond.
I would like to see is a dedicated lane for electric bikes and conventional bicyclists on either side of West Coast Highway
throughout Newport Beach, a Complete Street. Caltrans definition of “Complete Streets”: https://dot.ca.gov/programs/
transportation-planning/office-of-smart-mobility-climate-change/smart-mobility-active-transportation/complete-streets
The result would be longer wait times at signals (traffic calming). If traffic is calmed on West Coast Highway, thru traffic
would elect to use alternative routes to West Coast Highway (405 Freeway). If West Coast Highway were designated/
developed as a Complete Street throughout Newport Beach (not just Mariners Mile), drivers would not elect to use
alternative parallel residential streets to avoid slow spots/congested spots. The result would be a calmer residential feel
along West Coast Highway throughout Newport, similar to Corona Del Mar. Continued
Technical Support: Hello, everyone. If you have any technical issues during today’s webinar, please send me Technical
Support a private message describing your issue. I will help diagnose the problem.
David Tanner: This would increase public safety for pedestrians and cyclists. This would benefit commercial businesses
along West Coast Highway. This would help the City meet its Greenhouse Gas and Climate Change reduction requirements
when updating its General Plan. Caltrans has a new policy. Any expansion of Caltrans transportation facilities must come
with a reduction of VMT/air emissions. Here is a recent Caltrans report (Caltrans Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Mitigation
Report, August 2020): https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/transportation-planning/documents/office-of-
smart-mobility-and-climate-change/ghg-emissions-and-mitigation-report-final-august-2-2020-revision9-9-2020-a11y.pdf
Here is another link to what Caltrans is thinking (Section 5.1 - Energy Conservation and Emissions Reduction): https://dot.
ca.gov/caltrans-near-me/district-11/programs/district-11-environmental/i-5pwp-toc/s5-1 “Bicycle and pedestrian projects/
programs should reduce all pollutants by reducing VMT
David Tanner: There is no raise your hand feature on my screen.
Jeff Herdman: Dave,
Taylor York (Technical Support): The raise hand feature may be located in the menu at the bottom of the participants
panel.
Mary Ann Soden: drove from original Harbor View Hills to Lincoln Elementary to walk the dogs.
Susan Eaton: Walked around my complex with my dog.
Susan De Santis: I drove to Balboa Island today from Newport Coast.
Jeff Herdman: Drove from my home on Balboa island to our storage unit in Costa Mesa about an hour ago.
Dorothy Larson: walked to Ace Hardware in CdM
janet rappaport: From Janet drove from CDM to Costa Mesa (Ralphs)
David Tanner: Update the recent traffic syncronization program to benefit the residents, not Caltrans! Cross street wait
times are now excessive. Example: 5 minute wait time at Prospect and Orange Streets are causing backup and blockage
of Newport Shores Drive.
236
5Circulation Element Themes - Virtual Workshop After Action Report
Dennis Bress: That poll should have ALL of above as an option.
Dorothy Larson: or more thanone option
janet rappaport: all of the above is what I would have chosen
P. Matheis: I think a healthy city would include a SAFE bicycle pathway(s) through a community as much as reasonably
possible.
Susan Eaton: I’d wonder where Segway, electric scooters, and what it would take to be able to use more golf carts or other
small street vehicles
Jenna Tourje, Facilitator: Thanks all for your comments - we’re capturing them and will make sure to bring them up in the
discussion. Keep them coming!
Dennis Bress: City of Irvine has a great web site and Bike infrastructure.... https://www.cityofirvine.org/transportation/
irvine-shares-way
David Tanner: What is the growth inducing component of increasing public transportation?
Dennis Bress: Great PDF http://legacy.cityofirvine.org/civica/filebank/blobdload.asp?BlobID=18745
Charles Klobe: Not much of a workshop if staff presents and residents can only listen. Do you expect us to remember our
input at the end?
Dennis Bress: What is the link to the City Web site page you want us to see / read / comment on ? Can you put it in this
chat. Thank you.
Taylor York (Technical Support): NewportTogether.com
Dennis Bress: Thank you.
Dorothy Larson: one way streets in CdM
Susan De Santis: Climate Change
Jim Kociuba: Removing Regional Traffic from Newport Heights and CliffHaven
Mary Ann Soden: Preserving residential neighborhoods from becoming ancillary to the highways
Susan De Santis: Electric Vehicle charging
janet rappaport: liveable neighborhoods - safe for pedestrians and cyclists
Dennis Bress: More EV Charging city Wide.
P. Matheis: Does the widening of larger arterial roadways as a method to manage increased traffic consider the impact of
such a great expanse of pavement throughout the city?
Taylor York (Technical Support): To find more information on the project, copy and paste this link into your browser: www.
newporttogether.com.
237
6Circulation Element Themes - Virtual Workshop After Action Report
Dennis Bress: OCTA phase 2 Light Rail connection to JWA and then from JWA to Harbor Transit Center, then up to
Anaheim ARTIC. Then from ARTIC using The Boring Company Tunnel technology to connect to ONT Ontario Airport.
joyce Lau: build subways/underground people movers and roads to increase mobility
Susan De Santis: Curbside management of delivery trucks and Uber/Lyft on PCH and Marine Avenue
Mary Ann Soden: I think the phrase “cut through traffic” might be what I think of as ancillary to the highway. In my
neighborhood, Harbor View Dr. is used as a bypass to Coast Hwy. in place of San Joaquin Hills Road. This is undermining
the residential quality and safety.
Jenna Tourje, Facilitator: Thank you, Mary Ann!
Dennis Bress: Electric mode of transportation on the Santa Ana River Bed up to Anaheim and beyond to Yorba Linda. This
is a majory artery that we can use to move people.
Susan Eaton: What about that kind of a cross over the Back Bay?
Susan De Santis: EV car sharing programs
P. Matheis: Realistically, vehicles are so safe now and vehicle collision deaths will likely drop in the future with the advent
of autonomous vehicles-something a little further off than previously expected. However, vehicle versus pedestrian deaths
and bicycle deaths are likely to increase as people move to more active lifestyles. How can the city protect these folks
from vehicles?
P. Matheis: Thank you for the answer on wider roadways. An example of wide roadway through a community that is being
reconsidered is the Kensington Expressway in Buffalo, N.Y.
Dennis Bress: We need the BOS - Board Of Supervisors to fund NOW a Feasibility study on how / what technology we
can use to meet our transportation needs. 14% of the traffic into JWA is for Disneyland. If we could have those folks land
@ ONT Ontario who has the room to grow, currently they are 6 MAP - Million Air Passengers and room to go to 31 MAP
!!! They spent recently $2.5B on airport upgrades with 2 long runways 12,200 feet and 10,200 and the want the additional
traffic. We could use Elon Musk The Boring company to tunnel (33 miles from Anaheim ARTIC transportation hub) to ONT.
One way @ $10M/mile, $330M one way, x2 (need 2 tunnels) = $660M and this would basically relieve JWA 14% of the
Disney traffic and ONT has lower flights. Win, Win, Win. We are already spending $400M via OCTA and partners on the
4 mile Santa Ana OC Streetcar and phase 2 of the OC Streetcar can connect to JWA and up to Harbor Transit Center, to
Anaheim ARTIC and then from the ARTIC using The Boring Company tunnel technology to ONT
Mary Ann Soden: Drones, noise and privacy pollution. Aweful
Jim Kociuba: Does VMA consider the damage to the environment caused by long traffic backups on Coast Highway
because of too few lanes in Mariners Mile?
Jim Kociuba: I mean VMT … not VMA in above question.
Susan De Santis: Does the emphasis on VMT as a metric reflect a new paradym on how we plan our communities and
mobility systems?
Taylor York (Technical Support): To find more information or provide input on the project, copy and paste this link into your
browser: www.newporttogether.com.
janet rappaport: Dennis Bress - great ideas. I will look at your website.
238
7Circulation Element Themes - Virtual Workshop After Action Report
janet rappaport: these are the county wide ideas we need. OC is so far behind our neighbor LA on this so happy to hear
there is progress being made....
Dennis Bress: Is there a general email address that I / we can send email / communication ?
Ben Zdeba: GPUpdate@newportbeachca.gov
Dennis Bress: Thank you.
Susan De Santis: Does Newport Beach have a TDM policy/ordinance?
P. Matheis: I submit that autonomous vehicles (ride-share or other) will replace mass transportation in the future because
AI, the information Tony Petros et al spoke about. The infrastructure is already developed in the form of paved roadways.
Ben Zdeba: Susan, yes the City does have a transportation demand management (TDM) ordinance. Thanks for asking!
Ben Zdeba: Here is a link to that Ordinance: https://www.codepublishing.com/CA/NewportBeach/#!/NewportBeach20/
NewportBeach2044.html#20.44
Charles Klobe: How does our traffic phasing ordinance apply here?
David Tanner: Hopefully, the City General Plan update will analyze traffic congestion’s impact on emergency service
response times.
Charles Klobe: Jean Watt turns 95 tomorrow 12/16.
Dennis Bress: Happy Early Birthday Jean Watt #LOVE
P. Matheis: With respect to the TPO, does the city work with the city of Irvine regarding development near the Newport
Beach border? As I recall, Newport Beach successfully sued Irvine over an EIR issue in the early 2000s.
Mary Ann Soden: when will this recording post on the Newport Together website? I was called away and would like to
catch up.
Mary Ann Soden: Great. Thank you.
Webinar Manager (Christian Mendez): Hi Mary Ann, the workshop recording will be available Thursday in the following
page https://www.newporttogether.com/circulation-element-themes
Dennis Bress: The Boring Company Tunnel is the solution
Susan De Santis: Does the current circulation element include AARP design guidelines to accommodate seniors’ needs for
wider sidewalks and curbcuts for wheelchairs and walkers?
Dennis Bress: https://www.boringcompany.com/projects#ht
P. Matheis: Now the Daily Pilot publishes bogus news daily.
joyce Lau: The Boring Company Tunnel will be a solution to many area in NB
Mary Ann Soden: These large roads are the alternative to PCH. We need to better sign and direct traffic where there is
room.
239
8Circulation Element Themes - Virtual Workshop After Action Report
Jim Campbell: Routing software like google maps and waze do that for you.
Mary Ann Soden: I should have been more specific. San Joaquin Hills Road is the alternative for PCH, not HV Dr., but they
get sent through our neighborhood of homes. Closing some inappropriate cut throughs might be something to consider.
So we should think about how our circulation preserves the qualities of residential neighbors. :)
P. Matheis: Because the vast majority of roadways in NB are layed out like spaghetti as opposed to township coordinates
the routing apps don’t used neighborhoods as much on the East side.
Nancy Scarbrough: What a unique and interesting idea Dennis. The Santa Ana Riverbed.
Charles Klobe: Ross Perot Jr. proposed a privately funded freeway over the Santa Ana River from the 405 to the beach
years ago. No takers.
Nancy Scarbrough: When we talk about bikes for transportation, we have to remember that Newport Beach has an aging
population. Not many 75 to 90 year olds are going to use bikes to get around.
janet rappaport: But a lot of us still do use bikes and have ridden for all our lives... so bike trails can help for all
Susan De Santis: Thank you!
Dennis Bress: Thank you
Jonathan Langford: Thanks!
P. Matheis: I suspect that artificial intelligence will lead to new discoveries in many of these unknown outcomes.
240
9Circulation Element Themes - Virtual Workshop After Action Report
December 16 Circulation Element Themes Virtual Workshop Chat
Taylor York (Tech Support): Welcome to the Newport Beach – Circulation Element Themes Workshop Meeting. We will
begin shortly!
Taylor York (Tech Support): Technical Support: Hello, everyone. If you have any technical issues during today’s webinar,
please send me Technical Support a private message describing your issue. I will help diagnose the problem.
Taylor York (Tech Support): Welcome to the Newport Beach – Circulation Element Themes Workshop Meeting. We will
begin shortly! Technical Support: Hello, everyone. If you have any technical issues during today’s webinar, please send me
Technical Support a private message describing your issue. I will help diagnose the problem.
Jim Campbell: Tustin, I took the bus to the beach during the summer
janet rappaport: 2018 bus to Laguna down PCH from CDM
Dennis Baker: SNA to Avacado about 6 years ago.
Bruce Bartram: I have never taken an Orange County Bus. The last bus I took was in Europe. My neighborhood is Newport
Crest.
Dennis Baker: Never guess the 1st or last answer in a multiple choice
Jenna Tourje, K&W: Good point, Dennis!
David Tanner: Test Effectiveness of Existing Goals, policies and Implementation Actions • Revaluate goals,
policies and implementation actions to increase the function and efficiency of the City’s emergency evacuation routes.
Establish new Goal(s) as needed. Establish minimum design standards for emergency evacuation routes. o Policy:
Independent operation of traffic signals o Policy: Maintain system effectiveness during periods of emergency power
shutoffs New Goals • Establish a new goal and policy(s) to maximize the efficiency of the City’s circulation system and
minimize the circulation systems carbon footprint. o Where feasible, digitize the City’s circulation infrastructure. This
will not only make the circulation system more efficient, but will reduce the circulation system’s carbon footprint. •
Account for changes in circumstances affecting the Circulation Element including new government data on projected sea
level rise. Utilize the USGS Interactive Guide to Global Sea Level Rise Scenarios. Evaluate the mi
David Tanner: Continued - Utilize the USGS Interactive Guide to Global Sea Level Rise Scenarios. Evaluate the mid-range
assumptions recommended by the USGS. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/whcmsc/science/sea-level-change?qt-science_
center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects Changes/Additions to Existing Goals • Goal 1.1 Mobility. Evaluate
the effectiveness of Goal CE 1.1 Mobility. Establish policies and implementation actions to minimize or eliminate cross
traffic within residential neighborhoods. Consider designating certain areas disadvantaged communities. • Goal CE
2.1 Roadway System. Clarify Policy 2.3.1 by identifying the ultimate width of Coast Highway along Mariners Mile and
throughout the City. • Goal CE 3.1 Regional Transportation. Add a Policy to identify all future bridge crossings over the
City’s arterial roadway system, not just the 19th Street bridge (Policy 3.1.5). Evaluate their impact on the City EOP and
public safety in the EIR.
David Tanner: • Goal 5.1 Alternative Transportation Modes. Add a new policy(s) to encourage development of
complete streets. Include a Complete Streets Master Plan exhibit • Goal 5.2 Enhanced and maintained public water
transportation services … Add a Policy to Expand Electric Water Transportation Modes. • Goal 7.1 Parking.
Evaluate the effectiveness of Goal CE 7.1 to minimize or eliminate adverse circulation impacts (parking) within residential
neighborhoods near coastal resources. Consider designating certain areas disadvantaged communities.
Dennis Baker: Re: Alt to car trans. What is being considered for skateboards, push scooters, roller skates, etc. Related what
241
10Circulation Element Themes - Virtual Workshop After Action Report
about hover boards, e-bikes, e-skateboards?
Dennis Baker: Why must the main school drop offs be right in front of the school? Why not in a less trafficked part of
campus or a bloc away?
Dennis Baker: Ped Safety - Calm corners, i.e. bulges or protrusions i.e. Carnation leaving PCH is narrow and slows the traffic
coming through.
Dennis Baker: Why isn’t Fairchild synchronized? it is totally random.
Jim Kociuba: Dennis Baker, State codes require a school drop-off at each entrance.
Dennis Baker: How will liability be handled with shared valet and using off hour business lots?
Dennis Baker: I carpool. not listed
Jenna Tourje, K&W: Good note! Carpooling is also a good option
P. Matheis: Do roadway improvements equate to wider roadways, more pavement, etc... in the eyes of city planners?
P. Matheis: The genesis of my question is illustrated in the exceptionally wide section of MacArthur Boulevard in the Airport
Area with so little traffic to support such a freeway sized design at grade level that divides a community.
Susan De Santis: Does the City’s ITS allow interaction between signals, speed limits, and smart cars?
Jim Kociuba: California law requires cars to stay 3ft away from bikes. The chokers in Newport Heights pushed bikes closer
than 3ft to cars. How does “complete streets” resolve this?
janet rappaport: In winter sometimes the back bay trail is closed due to slides etc., not sure what we can do about that
but if you rely on that as a commuter (biking the back bay) it may sometimes not be available. Maybe there can be some
options ? ( we have moved on from this topic but just wanted to raise this point in the notes.)
P. Matheis: Realistically, traffic dropping children off at a school established in a residential neighborhood may be considered
a similar to a commercial application where people are dropped off at a scheduled event like the Honda Center in Anaheim.
Susan De Santis: Would more people take shuttles to restaurants or to go to Fashion Island if it were convenient?
Dennis Bress: Yes for sure. From Balboa Island to and from Fashion Island for sure.
P. Matheis: Most people like convenience, i.e., what they want, where they want it, when they want it.
janet rappaport: Question : I am wondering if we are working with Irvine on traffic with the new medical center to be built
on Jamboree (close the Newport border). If there were bike trails, etc. into that facility that might mitigate some of the
traffic that will certainly come with that new facility. Just raising this because it seems this will impact Newport quite a bit.
Not sure what the answer is not if this is even relevant to this current discussion.
Jim Kociuba: From what I understand, restricting or reducing parking on a project can reduce its VMT. Is Newport going
to do this?
Dennis Bress: We know about the study and looking forward to it happening when we can. Thank you. :-)
Susan De Santis: With the focus on reducing VMT/VT, there may be more demand for alternative transportation modes.
242
11Circulation Element Themes - Virtual Workshop After Action Report
janet rappaport: This new medical complex will span the area from Fairchild to Campus drive -- - - it will be very large.
Dennis Bress: YES !!!!
janet rappaport: Perhaps this is a regional issue.
Dennis Baker: I’m interested in any comments regarding the psychology of driving. Does a good flow of traffic contribute
to better driving? I.e. avoiding the frustration of “missing all the lights”. When traffic is flowing, I am a much calmer driver.
Susan De Santis: Is the City considering developing a parking availability app for mobile phones?
P. Matheis: Is there a reason that this city (Newport Beach) does not work to annex an entire roadway near its borders?
Some of these discussions speak to the challenge having to work with adjacent cities on traffic management when some
of this can be streamlined by annexing the entire roadway easement. Remember that Irvine was incorporated in 1971, long
after the airport area was incorporated into NB. Similar issues exist in West Santa Ana Heights at Santa Ana Avenue.
Charles Klobe: Agree with David Tanner.
Charles Klobe: The city plans to remove on grade crosswalks when the two bridges are built. When will the staff acknowledge
this? We need a vision for PCH from the HB border to Bayside.
Jim Kociuba: Will we be charging more for parking in order to reduce VMT?
Nancy Scarbrough: Follow up the Charles question, Are the Bikes expected to use the bridges as well or will they continue
on the street?
janet rappaport: My concern is “efficiency” = speed/ mph (not sure that is good ?)
Susan De Santis: Is there a countywide Ride Sharing organization that coordinates home to work trips? If so, does the city
support this organization?
Nancy Scarbrough: Thanks Jim, that’s what I am asking.
P. Matheis: It seems that from this discussion that the only city that effectively interacts with circulation is Irvine, and not
HB, Costa Mesa, LB.
Jim Mosher: For the record, a Coastal Development Permit for the Superior Bridge was recently before the Zoning
Administrator. In seeking approval, the planner for the project assured the ZA and the public there was NO plan to remove
the crosswalk. Removing the at-grade cross-walk seems very inconvenient from a standpoint of ADA circulation -- having
to climb up a hill and back down simply to cross a street. This contradiction regarding how the City plans to implement
General Plan policy is disturbing.
Jim Kociuba: What are the circulation metrics used to measure and mitigate climate change? It is just VMT?
Susan De Santis: Jim, will there be another housing workshop that reviews goals, objectives , actions and future planning
in a similar fashion to these circulation element workshop?
P. Matheis: What does the word “climate” intended to convey regarding circulation?
P. Matheis: Intend
Charles Klobe: We need a vision for PCH from the HB border to Bayside. The 2006 GP took a view of Mariners Mile as
243
12Circulation Element Themes - Virtual Workshop After Action Report
dilapidated, and needing redevelopment. The current community vision embraces the funkyness of the area. Implementing
the 2006 MM specific plan now is outdated and that affects then circulation element. This needs to be addressed and it is
not by the current housing committee.
Dennis Bress: I posted this Idea on the NewportTogether site too....Feasibility Study regarding transportation from JWA
to Anaheim ARTIC and from ARTIC to ONT Ontario Airport We need a Feasibility study what are the ROUTES and then
what technology we can use to meet our transportation needs to get from Newport JWA to Anaheim ARTIC. We need
a Feasibility study to determine what are the ROUTES and then what technology we can use to meet our transportation
needs to get from Newport JWA to Anaheim ARTIC. Then once at the ARTIC, we need to work with the County on getting
a route / public transportation to Ontario ONT airport.
Dennis Bress: 14% of the traffic into JWA is for Disneyland. If we could have those folks land @ ONT Ontario who has the
room to grow, currently they are 6 MAP - Million Air Passengers and room to go to 31 MAP !!! They spent recently $2.5B on
airport upgrades with 2 long runways 12,200 feet and 10,200 and the want the additional traffic. OCTA has already broken
ground and funded the OCStreet Car…. We are already spending $400M via OCTA and partners on the 4 mile Santa Ana
OC Streetcar. https://octa.net/Projects-and-Programs/All-Projects/Rail-Projects/OC-Streetcar/?frm=7683
Dennis Baker: At the policy level, could there not be a reference to “calming”?
Charles Klobe: My earlier comment is a big picture theme.
P. Matheis: The fact that the city is investing so much energy into this process is promising. However, it is clear that
regulatory preemptive demands will continue to challenge these efforts. Flexibility and a modular components may be
helpful.
Jim Kociuba: There are some people that want Mariners Mile to stay the way it is, and there are others that want it widened
and redevelopment. We need to have a dedicated meeting on this.
Christian Mendez (Webinar Manager): To find more information on the project, copy and paste this link into your browser:
www.newporttogether.com
P. Matheis: I can’t imagine a six lane West Coast Hwy along Mariners Mile. We just finished discussing residential development
at the Ardell site for walking around adjacent to Mariners Mile.
Dennis Bress: YES !!!! Great idea Nancy. :-)
Susan Eaton: Since we are seeing more use of alternative local transportation now, I suspect there will be much more in
the future. I’m elderly and chose to drive less pre-Covid. I am also interested in the climate crisis and alternative housing
including homeless and avoidable housing at all levels (including for elderly). Considering all this and re the circulation
element in the big picture, I foresee that the circulation element would be wise to include a lot of safe alternative roadways
for electric bikes, bikes, scooters, etc. and being compatible with pedestrians. I would like to get an electric scooter and
wonder if I could use it on the sidewalk on San Joaquin Hills Road for example.
Dennis Bress: I charge at the City Hall location.
Jim Kociuba: P. Matheis, the problem is regional traffic on its way to Newport Blvd that should be on Mariners Mile is now
pouring through Newport Heights and Cliff Haven. We need a solution and 6 lanes seems to be the only answer.
Dennis Baker: You can’t get to NP Blvd faster by cutting through the heights, even at busy time.
Charles Klobe: Dennis Baker is correct.
244
13Circulation Element Themes - Virtual Workshop After Action Report
Bruce Bartram: I would like to thank City Staff and all participants for an interesting and informative presentation.
Jim Kociuba: Cliff Drive is turning into a Mariners Mile bypass …
Dennis Baker: Thanks Jenna and staff. Well done. and Tony P.
Jonathan Langford: Thank you!
Dennis Bress: Thank you. :-)
Susan De Santis: Thank you for an engaging conversation!
Christian Mendez (Webinar Manager): To find more information on the project, copy and paste this link into your browser:
www.newporttogether.com
Charles Klobe: Thank you Jenna, Tony Petros and staff.
245
1Circulation Element Visioning - Virtual Workshop After Action Report
Prepared by Kearns & West February 26, 2021
Circulation Element Visioning - Virtual Workshop
After Action Report
Held On: February 10, 2021
246
2Circulation Element Visioning - Virtual Workshop After Action Report
Introduction
On February 10, 2021, the City of Newport Beach (City) hosted a virtual Circulation Element
Visioning Workshop. The goal of this workshop was to inform that community about proposed
changes to the circulation element and to seek feedback on how to address these changes.
Workshop Objectives
The workshop had three objectives. The first objective was to provide community members with
an overview of how the Circulation Element is proposed to change and how it is not. The second
was to highlight where community input, State mandates, and City priorities have driven the
proposal to update or not update. The final objective was to seek feedback from the community
on actions necessary to accurately address proposed changes, and challenges related to these
actions.
Getting the Word Out
Information about the workshop was shared through the City’s distribution email, on social media
platforms, as an item on the City’s event calendar, and was announced through an electronic
newsletter to community members registered on NewportTogether.com. Additionally, City staff
made a presentation during the City’s February 9, 2020 Planning Commission meeting highlighting
the workshop and project website.
Workshop Format: Date, Time, Platform, and Attendance Summary
• Wednesday, February 10, 2021, from 6:00 – 8:00 p.m. via Zoom.
• Total attendance of 35 participants
• Total of 33 web attendees and 2 call-in attendees
Workshop Format
The workshop format included presentations from City staff followed by community discussions
on important considerations and challenges related to changes in certain Circulation Element
themes. Presentations and related opportunities for feedback were divided into two topic areas:
(1) what is not proposed to change and (2) what is proposed to change in the updated Circulation
Element.
What is Not Proposed to Change
For this topic area, staff highlighted components of the Circulation Element that are not proposed
to change during the update. Staff then discussed the Orange County Transportation Authority’s
(OCTA) Master Plan of Highways, including related funding and ramifications related to deviating
from the plan. Community members provided feedback on this topic during the discussion.
What is Proposed to Change
For this topic area, staff highlighted components of the Circulation Element that are proposed
to change during the update, indicating which are driven by community feedback, mandated by
the State, and driven by the City. Due to the depth of this subject matter, meeting participants
were asked to prioritize themes, and the top four were chosen to discuss during the meeting. The
facilitator noted that community members could provide additional feedback on all themes through
247
3Circulation Element Visioning - Virtual Workshop After Action Report
NewportTogether.com.
The top four themes prioritized for discussion were:
• Parking – Parking apps, curbside parking for rideshare (Uber/Lyft).
• Climate Change - Telecommuting, EV Charging, carpooling, transit efficiency.
• Mobility - Complete Streets, Santa Ana River, construction management plans.
• Alternative Transportation Modes - Bicycle Master Plan, electric bikes.
Major Themes from Public Questions and Comments
Workshop participants provided feedback on Circulation Element themes that are proposed to
change. Discussion addressed the four themes prioritized by meeting attendees, and discussion of
each was guided by two questions:
1. What is important this theme?
2. What are some challenges related to implementation of this theme?
Below is an overview of feedback received for each of the four prioritized themes.
OCTA Master Plan of Highways Discussion
• Participants were interested in the City’s plans for consistency with the Orange County
Transportation Authority Master Plan of Highways (OCTA Master Plan), including the
possibility of amendments to the Master Plan and questions about addressing certain
road segments within the City.
• Community members commented on traffic challenges posed by varying widths of
Pacific Coast Highway through Mariners Mile. This included comments on congestion,
safety, and challenges with motorists using alternate routes through neighborhoods to
bypass traffic. It was further noted that this neighborhood traffic can posed a safety
hazard for pedestrians, including students and cyclists on smaller neighborhood streets.
• There was discussion on additional highways or bridges that could provide direct
access to the beach from surrounding communities.
Parking Theme Discussion: Parking apps, curbside parking for rideshare (Uber/Lyft)
• Concern was raised whether rideshare services like Uber and Lyft would be viable post
Covid-19.
• Loading zones and designed parking spaces for rideshare vehicles was seen as favorable
and could address unsafe practices such as rideshare passenger off-loading in center
medians.
• Community members commented that parking availability for visitors should be closely
considered when proposing to remove or redesignate parking for things like rideshare
vehicles and outdoor dining.
• There was discussion that the City should consider an increasing number of electric
vehicles when making parking policy. This could include different parking rates or
reserved spots for electric vehicles. However, it was noted that the City should consider
that different rates could cause challenges with equal access.
248
4Circulation Element Visioning - Virtual Workshop After Action Report
Climate Change Theme Discussion: Telecommuting, EV Charging, carpooling, transit efficiency
• There was discussion about methods for increasing electric vehicle charger availability,
including requirements for new construction, policy that incentivize station developers,
and prioritizing development of charging stations at hotels.
• Discussion highlighted the importance of considering the impact of circulation on
disadvantaged communities, including the importance of specific and enforceable
policies for addressing greenhouse gas emissions and zero-emission vehicles as a tool.
• It was noted that adoption of electric and other advanced technology vehicles is
expected to increase significantly in the near future.
• There was concern that implementing ‘vehicle miles travelled’ policies could increase
traffic in the short term, until alternative modes become more viable.
• Community members suggested that free parking connected to local destinations by
a free shuttle would be valuable.
Mobility - Complete Streets, Santa Ana River, construction management plans.
• Safety of bicyclists, pedestrians on some roads was a major topic of discussion. Issues
included sidewalks, lighting, speed of vehicles, and pedestrian and driver behavior.
• There were questions about whether complete streets are the right approach for all
streets in the City, or if they are only appropriate for some street types.
• A question was asked whether complete streets is required as an integral component
of proposed mixed-use or multi-unit residential development in the City.
Alternative Transportation Modes - Bicycle Master Plan, electric bikes.
• Community members noted that an update to the City Bicycle Masterplan is needed
before policies are implemented, including consideration of electric mobility (e.g.
e-bikes).
• Safety for bicyclists and pedestrians was discussed, including the importance of
sidewalks and bike paths adjacent to schools, safe and/or separated bike paths, bicycle
and pedestrian behaviors, and consideration of different rider skill levels.
• It was noted that bicycle lanes and complete streets can increase foot traffic and
tourism at local businesses, though the City will need to carefully consider how higher-
speed modes such as bicycles and e-bikes interact with pedestrians and other lower-
speed modes. Enforcement of these issues should also be a priority.
• Community members noted that facilities for bikes and pedestrians, including bike
racks, could be beneficial.
Online Input Opportunities: Newport, Together
The Newport, Together Circulation Element workshop webpage includes recordings from the
workshop and virtual tools to gather input from community members on Circulation Element themes
that are proposed to change. The input activity presents two questions to guide feedback:
For each theme:
1. What is important?
2. What are some challenges related to implementation?
249
5Circulation Element Visioning - Virtual Workshop After Action Report
February 10 Circulation Element Visioning Virtual Workshop Chat
18:09:58 From (Technical Support) Taylor York to Everyone : Technical Support: Hello, everyone.
If you have any technical issues during today’s webinar, please send me Technical Support a private
message describing your issue. I will help diagnose the problem.
18:11:01 From Dennis Baker to Everyone : Harbor Patrol Beach by foot
18:11:08 From Jim Campbell to Everyone : I want to go to the beach by car if there is any parking.
18:11:23 From Susan De Santis to Everyone : Crystal Cove by Uber
18:11:47 From Jonathan Langford to Everyone : Run through Crystal Cove.
18:11:56 From Nancy Scarbrough to Everyone : the restaurant down the street by my neighborhood
electric vehicle
18:18:09 From David Tanner to Everyone : When will the public be able to provide input on where
housing will occur. Tor example If the public does not support staff recommendations when does
the public get to provide input (example the public might not support housing in high noise areas)?
18:19:49 From Jim Campbell to Everyone : Input on housing is better left to the Housing Element
Update meetings and workshops, but you can make any comment you might like tonight.
18:23:38 From David Tanner to Everyone : What is the policy WCH along Mariners Mile? Will it
be widened consistent with the regional plan. This should be addressed in the Circulation Element
update. The Community has a significant interest in the future of this roadway.
18:24:08 From Noah Blom to Everyone : Why can I not get in????
18:30:01 From David Tanner to Everyone : What is the ultimate plan for Corona Del Mar?
18:32:52 From Christian Mendez (Host) Kearns & West to (Technical Support) Taylor York(Direct
Message) : https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/201362593-Launching-Zoom-from-a-web-
browser
18:32:55 From Charles Klobe to Everyone : This is now the third circulation meeting focused on
widening WCH through Mariner’s Mile. Is there anything else to talk about?
18:33:02 From Christian Mendez (Host) Kearns & West to (Technical Support) Taylor York(Direct
Message) : ask them to join via the browser
18:33:32 From Dennis Baker to Everyone : The OC Master Plan can be amended. 20th extension
over SA River was removed.
18:34:09 From jim kociuba to Everyone : Mariners Mile decisions directly impact student traffic
safety
Coast Highway has more lanes east of Dover Drive and west of Newport Blvd then it has in the
Mariners Mile. The result is, during peak periods, Mariners Mile exhibits excessive congestion. To
avoid congestion, traffic navigation apps route regional traffic on Newport Height’s streets adjacent
250
6Circulation Element Visioning - Virtual Workshop After Action Report
to our schools. This forces student pedestrians and bicyclists to come in contact with aggressive
regional traffic flows. So, Mariners Mile decisions have a direct impact to student safety. Since 6
travel lanes on Mariners Mile would improve student traffic safety in Newport Heights, will NMUSD
have an important role in Mariners Mile?
18:34:15 From Dennis Baker to Everyone : correction 19th. Thanks Tony.
18:40:50 From David Tanner to Everyone : Consider establishing disadvantaged community(s)
impacted by circulation.
18:42:06 From Charles Klobe to Everyone : Years ago there was discussion of building some type
of freeway or roadway over top of the Santa Ana River to get traffic to and from the beach. They
envisioned it connecting with the 5/22 interchange in Orange.
18:43:07 From Nancy Scarbrough to Everyone : The 2014 Bicycle Master Plan needs to be updated,
before it is implemented.
18:44:43 From Dorothy Kraus to Everyone : Maybe that was the proposed Victoria Bridge that was
ultimately removed from the OCTA Master Plan due to public objection to the bridge and impact on
residential communities.
18:45:16 From Carmen Rawson to Everyone : Where is the 2014 Bicycle Master Plan available for
the general public to review it?
18:45:33 From Nancy Scarbrough to Everyone : There have been several traffic accidents on PCH
in just the last month. I hope that the traffic speed on PCH and the traffic accidents will be part of
what staff looks at with regard to their new policies.
18:46:14 From Jose Trinidad Castaneda to Everyone : There was mention of reducing conflicts
around electric bikes. I am an avid e-bike user and I am wondering if staff meant that e-bikes were
the problem, or that the car traffic was the issue. Seems strange to place the blame on e-bikes when
we need to reduce VMTs
18:46:15 From Charles Klobe to Everyone : The 2014 Bicycle Master Plan itself recommended it be
updated every five years. It has now been 7 years and there is no active plan to update it. Electric
mobility changes everything.
18:48:51 From Dorothy Kraus to Everyone : I thought that “complete streets” was an integral
component of any proposed mixed use or multil
18:48:58 From hoiyin ip to Everyone : David Tanner, drone has an impact to birds. Mindfulness is
needed
18:49:14 From David Tanner to Everyone : Emerging Technology: Consider the use of drones in the
circulation update. Drone use could include emergency services. The size of drones could be large
and small. Landing and takeoff pads should be identified for critical services.
18:49:24 From Dorothy Kraus to Everyone : .....properties zoned for multi residential units.
251
7Circulation Element Visioning - Virtual Workshop After Action Report
18:50:47 From hoiyin ip to Everyone : Uber and alike increased traffic
18:51:10 From Dorothy Kraus to Everyone : I wonder if in
18:51:29 From Mary Ann Soden to Everyone : ditto Dorothy, how are you thinking about ADU
impacts?
18:51:38 From Dorothy Kraus to Everyone : world of COVID UBER and Lfyt are viable??
18:52:57 From Nancy Scarbrough to Everyone : I love the idea of loading zones in front of businesses.
It also assists our elderly population for drop off zones.
18:53:15 From Dorothy Kraus to Everyone : hoiyin, I am not knowledgeable on the latest direction
the city is going with ADUs.
18:54:15 From David Tanner to Everyone : Designated Uber, Lyft, taxi designated parking spaces is
a good idea.
18:54:55 From Jose Trinidad Castaneda to Everyone : prioritizing more parking is Induced Demand.
How does this impact city strategies to achieve state mandated requirements regarding reduced
VMTs?
18:54:59 From hoiyin ip to Everyone : Need to reduce single passenger ride
18:57:20 From hoiyin ip to Everyone : Dennis Baker, good questions
18:59:20 From hoiyin ip to Everyone : Would like to c higher parking rates
19:00:08 From Susan De Santis to Everyone : How does VMT reduce travel?
19:00:26 From hoiyin ip to Everyone : Zero emission vehicle parking spots
19:02:31 From David Tanner to Everyone : The beach parking /tourism is growing in the future!
Parking is needed for our City’s economic well being.
19:05:06 From hoiyin ip to Everyone : Require EV charging stations in new buildings
19:05:29 From Carmen Rawson to Everyone : My understanding is that City staff is currently
looking at making outdoor dinning PERMANENT. The Newport Pier area needs all the public parking
it currently has and MORE. Allowing restaurants to have permanent outdoor dinning, where prior
to Covid we had parking spaces, is detrimental to local residents. Also, we would be taking away
parking spaces that are used by beach goers. Beach goers do not use Uber/Lift. They bring with
them all their beach belongings.
19:06:29 From Carmen Rawson to Everyone : In the Balboa Peninsula, last summer Uber/Lift drivers
were stopping on the middle of Balboa Blvd, right by Newport Pier, to let passengers off (stopping
traffic and creating unsafe situations)
19:06:51 From David Tanner to Everyone : Climate Change - The policies if used for environmental
mitigation need to be specific and enforceable. We can no longer say we are going to study the
problem. We have to have programs that insure the problem will be remedied.
252
8Circulation Element Visioning - Virtual Workshop After Action Report
19:08:12 From Jose Trinidad Castaneda to Everyone : the Providing shuttle service vs ridership
juxtaposition is a question of which came first: chicken or the egg? plan to provide the service first
and have long-term pilot systems that could take 2+ years
19:09:10 From Jose Trinidad Castaneda to Everyone : people need time to get used to shuttle
service schedules. Policy and implementation shouldn’t remove service hastily before cultural mode
shifts can sink in to residents’ habit formation.
19:09:20 From Mary Ann Soden to Everyone : Agree with Jose on building ridership with consistency.
19:10:32 From Susan De Santis to Everyone : Would limited parking supply result in using alternative
travel modes?
19:10:39 From hoiyin ip to Everyone : Consider higher parking rates for non-zero emission vehicles
19:10:41 From Jose Trinidad Castaneda to Everyone : is it possible to create a policy in the circulation
element to prioritize local EV charging station developers? Alternative Resource Group is based in
Costa Mesa and is developing 4th and 5th Generation supercharging stations.
19:10:47 From P. Matheis to Everyone : Current EV sales account for about 2% of auto sales. If
the mandate by the governor is to be realized that would indicate a great increase in the need for
charging stations.
19:11:13 From David Tanner to Everyone : How will Circulation Element planning account for ADUs?
19:16:19 From Susan De Santis to Everyone : Is an implementation challenge of VMT policies that
traffic congestion will increase in the short term until alternative modes become viable?
19:16:34 From Mary Ann Soden to Everyone : You might also think about linking the shuttle to
parking lots where drivers can park and then shuttle into the village.
19:20:09 From P. Matheis to Everyone : Families traveling from outside the city do tend to carry
a lot of baggage and will operate in a PVT auto. The city has used a number of strategies for the
Balboa Peninsula traffic management i.e., doughnut lane, shuttle service, et al. Few of these realized
the hopeful outcome. I suspect the advent of autonomous vehicles will play a significant role in a
future solution.
19:25:20 From Mary Ann Soden to Everyone : I do not think selling a parking spaces for a different
price based on the energy source is appropriate and raises issues of equal access to the streets for
all residents. Perhaps in 20 years the 2% EV will be more but today, that is benefiting a very small
percentage of the residents and visitors who have the ability to upgrade their vehicle.
19:25:44 From Carmen Rawson to Everyone : EV technology is improving (incresing) the miles
range to the point beach goers from nearby cities should not need to charge their EVs in our city.
Tourists coming from other states usually stay in local hotels or STL units so they could charge at
their location
19:25:53 From Mary Ann Soden to Everyone : Just my 2 cents for the records
19:27:13 From P. Matheis to Everyone : If the city is serious about a shuttle service then free parking
and free shuttle would make the effort more valuable to the regular folks.
253
9Circulation Element Visioning - Virtual Workshop After Action Report
19:29:00 From Mary Ann Soden to Everyone : Do you think every street can be a complete street?
19:31:50 From Carmen Rawson to Everyone : Tustin Avenue can be dangerous at night when people
are walking in the middle of the street. Street lighting is poor if not lacking at all so as a driver using
streets such as Tustin Avenue I support sidewalks
19:33:22 From jim kociuba to Everyone : Any street adjacent to a school needs sidewalks and bike
paths.
19:33:50 From Mary Ann Soden to Everyone : regarding “bikes & pedestrians” when I see a herd
of 12-18 year olds fly by with no helmets and no masks, I suggest that you need to look at what is
needed for young people to be on motorized vehicles.
19:34:43 From Jose Trinidad Castaneda to Everyone : complete streets that help bring about safer
bike paths would be ideal. I take my e-bike and having a protected lane would help keep me off the
sidewalk when I don’t feel safe biking next to fast traffic.
19:36:09 From P. Matheis to Everyone : While pedestrians are mostly similar cyclists are not. I
submit that there is a difference between a skilled person on a road bike that rides 100 miles a week
and a seven year old boy/girl on a bike. When these cyclists interact with vehicle traffic the element
of safety varies considerability.
19:42:45 From Jose Trinidad Castaneda to Everyone : Bike lanes and complete streets actually
increase foot traffic and tourism for local businesses. Business doesn’t take place inside cars.
19:45:30 From hoiyin ip to Everyone : David Tanner, good points. Thought on environmental justice,
GHG hurts the poor more. Need a balanced solution to not enable non zero emission vehicles
19:51:20 From Jose Trinidad Castaneda to Everyone : Restricting e-bikes seems to go against the
goal of reducing VMTs by increasing transit modes by bike/walk.
19:52:27 From Carmen Rawson to Everyone : A separate lane at the Oceanfront, for ebikes and/or
all bikes, will create a “freeway” nightmare. If we can not enforce the speed limit now at the existing
boardwalk how is it going to be enforced in a separate lane? People walk from the boardwalk to the
ocean, people play on the sand, you have young children playing there...
19:53:06 From P. Matheis to Everyone : While the idea of a boardwalk from River Jetty to the 36th
Street boardwalk would be fun the residents would flip out! Further, bicycles on the boardwalk with
pedestrians probably needs a low speed limit. Electric bicycles can go motorcycle fast.
19:53:55 From Jose Trinidad Castaneda to Everyone : Caltrans D12 - Orange County is developing
an Active Transportation Plan. Take the online survey to share where walking and biking can be
improved on and across the State Highway system. https://survey.catplan.org/Home?sid=12
19:54:02 From David Tanner to Everyone : Consider a policy to encourage electric bikes and similar
types of vehicles
19:54:49 From hoiyin ip to Everyone : Dennis, move your question to everyone
19:55:08 From Karen Tringali to Everyone : Please enforce e-bikes using sidewalks especially in
areas where a bike lane is availa ble like east CdM toward crystal cove
254
10Circulation Element Visioning - Virtual Workshop After Action Report
19:55:48 From Jose Trinidad Castaneda to Everyone : Drivers drive too fast. Ebike max speed is
20mph. Perhaps the ideal solution is having a separate bike path. Pedestrians are always walking on
bike paths and blocking cyclists as well.
19:56:12 From Christian Mendez (Host) Kearns & West to Everyone : To find more information on
the project, copy and paste this link into your browser: www.newporttogether.com
19:59:00 From Karen Tringali to Everyone : Will future Zoom confirmations come from your Kearns
email or with they come from Newport Together or city? This meeting registration confirmation was
really hard to find because of the odd sender
19:59:43 From Bruce Bartram to Everyone : Thanks to City Staff and Kearns & West for an interesting
and informative presentation.
20:00:09 From P. Matheis to Everyone : This presentation was well organized and helpful. Thank
you.
20:00:16 From Christian Mendez (Host) Kearns & West to Karen Tringali(Direct Message) : Thank
you for your comment, we will include in our note for future meeting confirmations
20:01:03 From Jose Trinidad Castaneda to Everyone : adding more bike racks could reduce bikes
pedestrian conflicts
20:02:37 From Jenna Tourje, Facilitator to Everyone : Hi Karen - the Zoom invite will come from
Kearns & West as we host the zoom license, but we can see if we can add a Newport Beach email
address to the invite. Thanks for your note!
255
1Circulation Element Visioning Virtual Workshop: Workshop Chat
CIRCULATION ELEMENT VISIONING VIRTUAL WORKSHOP:
Workshops Chat
February 10, 2021
Prepared by Kearns & West February 12, 2021
256
2Circulation Element Visioning Virtual Workshop: Workshop Chat
February 10 Circulation Element Visioning Virtual Workshop Chat
18:09:58 From (Technical Support) Taylor York to Everyone : Technical Support: Hello, everyone. If you have any technical
issues during today’s webinar, please send me Technical Support a private message describing your issue. I will help
diagnose the problem.
18:11:01 From Dennis Baker to Everyone : Harbor Patrol Beach by foot
18:11:08 From Jim Campbell to Everyone : I want to go to the beach by car if there is any parking.
18:11:23 From Susan De Santis to Everyone : Crystal Cove by Uber
18:11:47 From Jonathan Langford to Everyone : Run through Crystal Cove.
18:11:56 From Nancy Scarbrough to Everyone : the restaurant down the street by my neighborhood electric vehicle
18:18:09 From David Tanner to Everyone : When will the public be able to provide input on where housing will occur. Tor
example If the public does not support staff recommendations when does the public get to provide input (example the
public might not support housing in high noise areas)?
18:19:49 From Jim Campbell to Everyone : Input on housing is better left to the Housing Element Update meetings and
workshops, but you can make any comment you might like tonight.
18:23:38 From David Tanner to Everyone : What is the policy WCH along Mariners Mile? Will it be widened consistent with
the regional plan. This should be addressed in the Circulation Element update. The Community has a significant interest
in the future of this roadway.
18:24:08 From Noah Blom to Everyone : Why can I not get in????
18:30:01 From David Tanner to Everyone : What is the ultimate plan for Corona Del Mar?
18:32:52 From Christian Mendez (Host) Kearns & West to (Technical Support) Taylor York(Direct Message) : https://
support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/201362593-Launching-Zoom-from-a-web-browser
18:32:55 From Charles Klobe to Everyone : This is now the third circulation meeting focused on widening WCH through
Mariner’s Mile. Is there anything else to talk about?
18:33:02 From Christian Mendez (Host) Kearns & West to (Technical Support) Taylor York(Direct Message) : ask them to
join via the browser
18:33:32 From Dennis Baker to Everyone : The OC Master Plan can be amended. 20th extension over SA River was
removed.
18:34:09 From jim kociuba to Everyone : Mariners Mile decisions directly impact student traffic safety
Coast Highway has more lanes east of Dover Drive and west of Newport Blvd then it has in the Mariners Mile. The result
is, during peak periods, Mariners Mile exhibits excessive congestion. To avoid congestion, traffic navigation apps route
regional traffic on Newport Height’s streets adjacent to our schools. This forces student pedestrians and bicyclists to come
in contact with aggressive regional traffic flows. So, Mariners Mile decisions have a direct impact to student safety. Since
6 travel lanes on Mariners Mile would improve student traffic safety in Newport Heights, will NMUSD have an important
role in Mariners Mile?
257
3Circulation Element Visioning Virtual Workshop: Workshop Chat
18:34:15 From Dennis Baker to Everyone : correction 19th. Thanks Tony.
18:40:50 From David Tanner to Everyone : Consider establishing disadvantaged community(s) impacted by circulation.
18:42:06 From Charles Klobe to Everyone : Years ago there was discussion of building some type of freeway or roadway
over top of the Santa Ana River to get traffic to and from the beach. They envisioned it connecting with the 5/22
interchange in Orange.
18:43:07 From Nancy Scarbrough to Everyone : The 2014 Bicycle Master Plan needs to be updated, before it is implemented.
18:44:43 From Dorothy Kraus to Everyone : Maybe that was the proposed Victoria Bridge that was ultimately removed
from the OCTA Master Plan due to public objection to the bridge and impact on residential communities.
18:45:16 From Carmen Rawson to Everyone : Where is the 2014 Bicycle Master Plan available for the general public to
review it?
18:45:33 From Nancy Scarbrough to Everyone : There have been several traffic accidents on PCH in just the last month.
I hope that the traffic speed on PCH and the traffic accidents will be part of what staff looks at with regard to their new
policies.
18:46:14 From Jose Trinidad Castaneda to Everyone : There was mention of reducing conflicts around electric bikes. I am
an avid e-bike user and I am wondering if staff meant that e-bikes were the problem, or that the car traffic was the issue.
Seems strange to place the blame on e-bikes when we need to reduce VMTs
18:46:15 From Charles Klobe to Everyone : The 2014 Bicycle Master Plan itself recommended it be updated every five
years. It has now been 7 years and there is no active plan to update it. Electric mobility changes everything.
18:48:51 From Dorothy Kraus to Everyone : I thought that “complete streets” was an integral component of any proposed
mixed use or multil
18:48:58 From hoiyin ip to Everyone : David Tanner, drone has an impact to birds. Mindfulness is needed
18:49:14 From David Tanner to Everyone : Emerging Technology: Consider the use of drones in the circulation update.
Drone use could include emergency services. The size of drones could be large and small. Landing and takeoff pads
should be identified for critical services.
18:49:24 From Dorothy Kraus to Everyone : .....properties zoned for multi residential units.
18:50:47 From hoiyin ip to Everyone : Uber and alike increased traffic
18:51:10 From Dorothy Kraus to Everyone : I wonder if in
18:51:29 From Mary Ann Soden to Everyone : ditto Dorothy, how are you thinking about ADU impacts?
18:51:38 From Dorothy Kraus to Everyone : world of COVID UBER and Lfyt are viable??
18:52:57 From Nancy Scarbrough to Everyone : I love the idea of loading zones in front of businesses. It also assists our
elderly population for drop off zones.
18:53:15 From Dorothy Kraus to Everyone : hoiyin, I am not knowledgeable on the latest direction the city is going with
258
4Circulation Element Visioning Virtual Workshop: Workshop Chat
ADUs.
18:54:15 From David Tanner to Everyone : Designated Uber, Lyft, taxi designated parking spaces is a good idea.
18:54:55 From Jose Trinidad Castaneda to Everyone : prioritizing more parking is Induced Demand. How does this impact
city strategies to achieve state mandated requirements regarding reduced VMTs?
18:54:59 From hoiyin ip to Everyone : Need to reduce single passenger ride
18:57:20 From hoiyin ip to Everyone : Dennis Baker, good questions
18:59:20 From hoiyin ip to Everyone : Would like to c higher parking rates
19:00:08 From Susan De Santis to Everyone : How does VMT reduce travel?
19:00:26 From hoiyin ip to Everyone : Zero emission vehicle parking spots
19:02:31 From David Tanner to Everyone : The beach parking /tourism is growing in the future! Parking is needed for our
City’s economic well being.
19:05:06 From hoiyin ip to Everyone : Require EV charging stations in new buildings
19:05:29 From Carmen Rawson to Everyone : My understanding is that City staff is currently looking at making outdoor
dinning PERMANENT. The Newport Pier area needs all the public parking it currently has and MORE. Allowing restaurants
to have permanent outdoor dinning, where prior to Covid we had parking spaces, is detrimental to local residents. Also,
we would be taking away parking spaces that are used by beach goers. Beach goers do not use Uber/Lift. They bring
with them all their beach belongings.
19:06:29 From Carmen Rawson to Everyone : In the Balboa Peninsula, last summer Uber/Lift drivers were stopping on
the middle of Balboa Blvd, right by Newport Pier, to let passengers off (stopping traffic and creating unsafe situations)
19:06:51 From David Tanner to Everyone : Climate Change - The policies if used for environmental mitigation need to be
specific and enforceable. We can no longer say we are going to study the problem. We have to have programs that insure
the problem will be remedied.
19:08:12 From Jose Trinidad Castaneda to Everyone : the Providing shuttle service vs ridership juxtaposition is a question
of which came first: chicken or the egg? plan to provide the service first and have long-term pilot systems that could take
2+ years
19:09:10 From Jose Trinidad Castaneda to Everyone : people need time to get used to shuttle service schedules. Policy
and implementation shouldn’t remove service hastily before cultural mode shifts can sink in to residents’ habit formation.
19:09:20 From Mary Ann Soden to Everyone : Agree with Jose on building ridership with consistency.
19:10:32 From Susan De Santis to Everyone : Would limited parking supply result in using alternative travel modes?
19:10:39 From hoiyin ip to Everyone : Consider higher parking rates for non-zero emission vehicles
19:10:41 From Jose Trinidad Castaneda to Everyone : is it possible to create a policy in the circulation element to prioritize
local EV charging station developers? Alternative Resource Group is based in Costa Mesa and is developing 4th and 5th
Generation supercharging stations.
259
5Circulation Element Visioning Virtual Workshop: Workshop Chat
19:10:47 From P. Matheis to Everyone : Current EV sales account for about 2% of auto sales. If the mandate by the
governor is to be realized that would indicate a great increase in the need for charging stations.
19:11:13 From David Tanner to Everyone : How will Circulation Element planning account for ADUs?
19:16:19 From Susan De Santis to Everyone : Is an implementation challenge of VMT policies that traffic congestion will
increase in the short term until alternative modes become viable?
19:16:34 From Mary Ann Soden to Everyone : You might also think about linking the shuttle to parking lots where drivers
can park and then shuttle into the village.
19:20:09 From P. Matheis to Everyone : Families traveling from outside the city do tend to carry a lot of baggage and will
operate in a PVT auto. The city has used a number of strategies for the Balboa Peninsula traffic management i.e., doughnut
lane, shuttle service, et al. Few of these realized the hopeful outcome. I suspect the advent of autonomous vehicles will
play a significant role in a future solution.
19:25:20 From Mary Ann Soden to Everyone : I do not think selling a parking spaces for a different price based on the
energy source is appropriate and raises issues of equal access to the streets for all residents. Perhaps in 20 years the 2%
EV will be more but today, that is benefiting a very small percentage of the residents and visitors who have the ability to
upgrade their vehicle.
19:25:44 From Carmen Rawson to Everyone : EV technology is improving (incresing) the miles range to the point beach
goers from nearby cities should not need to charge their EVs in our city. Tourists coming from other states usually stay in
local hotels or STL units so they could charge at their location
19:25:53 From Mary Ann Soden to Everyone : Just my 2 cents for the records
19:27:13 From P. Matheis to Everyone : If the city is serious about a shuttle service then free parking and free shuttle would
make the effort more valuable to the regular folks.
19:29:00 From Mary Ann Soden to Everyone : Do you think every street can be a complete street?
19:31:50 From Carmen Rawson to Everyone : Tustin Avenue can be dangerous at night when people are walking in the
middle of the street. Street lighting is poor if not lacking at all so as a driver using streets such as Tustin Avenue I support
sidewalks
19:33:22 From jim kociuba to Everyone : Any street adjacent to a school needs sidewalks and bike paths.
19:33:50 From Mary Ann Soden to Everyone : regarding “bikes & pedestrians” when I see a herd of 12-18 year olds fly by
with no helmets and no masks, I suggest that you need to look at what is needed for young people to be on motorized
vehicles.
19:34:43 From Jose Trinidad Castaneda to Everyone : complete streets that help bring about safer bike paths would be
ideal. I take my e-bike and having a protected lane would help keep me off the sidewalk when I don’t feel safe biking next
to fast traffic.
19:36:09 From P. Matheis to Everyone : While pedestrians are mostly similar cyclists are not. I submit that there is a
difference between a skilled person on a road bike that rides 100 miles a week and a seven year old boy/girl on a bike.
When these cyclists interact with vehicle traffic the element of safety varies considerability.
19:42:45 From Jose Trinidad Castaneda to Everyone : Bike lanes and complete streets actually increase foot traffic and
tourism for local businesses. Business doesn’t take place inside cars.
260
6Circulation Element Visioning Virtual Workshop: Workshop Chat
19:45:30 From hoiyin ip to Everyone : David Tanner, good points. Thought on environmental justice, GHG hurts the poor
more. Need a balanced solution to not enable non zero emission vehicles
19:51:20 From Jose Trinidad Castaneda to Everyone : Restricting e-bikes seems to go against the goal of reducing VMTs
by increasing transit modes by bike/walk.
19:52:27 From Carmen Rawson to Everyone : A separate lane at the Oceanfront, for ebikes and/or all bikes, will create a
“freeway” nightmare. If we can not enforce the speed limit now at the existing boardwalk how is it going to be enforced in
a separate lane? People walk from the boardwalk to the ocean, people play on the sand, you have young children playing
there...
19:53:06 From P. Matheis to Everyone : While the idea of a boardwalk from River Jetty to the 36th Street boardwalk would
be fun the residents would flip out! Further, bicycles on the boardwalk with pedestrians probably needs a low speed limit.
Electric bicycles can go motorcycle fast.
19:53:55 From Jose Trinidad Castaneda to Everyone : Caltrans D12 - Orange County is developing an Active Transportation
Plan. Take the online survey to share where walking and biking can be improved on and across the State Highway system.
https://survey.catplan.org/Home?sid=12
19:54:02 From David Tanner to Everyone : Consider a policy to encourage electric bikes and similar types of vehicles
19:54:49 From hoiyin ip to Everyone : Dennis, move your question to everyone
19:55:08 From Karen Tringali to Everyone : Please enforce e-bikes using sidewalks especially in areas where a bike lane is
availa ble like east CdM toward crystal cove
19:55:48 From Jose Trinidad Castaneda to Everyone : Drivers drive too fast. Ebike max speed is 20mph. Perhaps the ideal
solution is having a separate bike path. Pedestrians are always walking on bike paths and blocking cyclists as well.
19:56:12 From Christian Mendez (Host) Kearns & West to Everyone : To find more information on the project, copy and
paste this link into your browser: www.newporttogether.com
19:59:00 From Karen Tringali to Everyone : Will future Zoom confirmations come from your Kearns email or with they
come from Newport Together or city? This meeting registration confirmation was really hard to find because of the odd
sender
19:59:43 From Bruce Bartram to Everyone : Thanks to City Staff and Kearns & West for an interesting and informative
presentation.
20:00:09 From P. Matheis to Everyone : This presentation was well organized and helpful. Thank you.
20:00:16 From Christian Mendez (Host) Kearns & West to Karen Tringali(Direct Message) : Thank you for your comment,
we will include in our note for future meeting confirmations
20:01:03 From Jose Trinidad Castaneda to Everyone : adding more bike racks could reduce bikes pedestrian conflicts
20:02:37 From Jenna Tourje, Facilitator to Everyone : Hi Karen - the Zoom invite will come from Kearns & West as we
host the zoom license, but we can see if we can add a Newport Beach email address to the invite. Thanks for your note!
261
1Initial Draft of Circulation Element Workshop
Initial Draft of Circulation Element Workshop
Chat Record
April 5, 2021
Prepared by Kearns & West
April 6, 2021
262
2Initial Draft of Circulation Element Workshop
Initial Draft of Circulation Element Workshop
00:37:38 Jasmine King (Technical Support): Hello, everyone. If you have any technical issues during today’s
webinar, please send me, Jasmine King (Technical Support), a private message describing your
issue. I will help diagnose the problem.
00:39:18 Jasmine King (Technical Support): To find more information on the project, copy and paste this link
into your browser: www.newporttogether.com.
00:40:18 David Tanner: Include the concept of Circular Economy in the Circulation Element. This concept
should be coordinated with the Land Use and Housing Element, etc.
00:42:24 David Tanner: Update the traffic ordinance to change the requirement for a traffic study to include
instances where there is significant public controversy. In determine what constitutes “significant public
controversy” error on the side of the public.
00:43:06 Jim Campbell: The 73 freeway extension
00:43:38 Adriana Fourcher: Yes, the Toll Road as well.
00:43:44 skeith dewine: Bayshore Drive - much more pleasant traversing down it
00:43:49 David Tanner: Include public outreach on proposed traffic/circulation changes. Regulatory as well as
any other.
00:44:28 Kathleen Andrews: Ample parking along both median and on sidewalk sides of Balboa Peninsula.
00:45:23 Nancy Scarbrough: PCH. Traffic moves too fast.
00:46:26 Jim Campbell: Curious what Traffic Engineer Brine thinks of an important improvement.
00:49:00 Adriana Fourcher: Jenna, how many participants are on this call, not including City staff, planners
or consultants?
00:49:44 David Tanner: Broaden the definition of vehicles to include electric vehicles (bicycles, skateboards,
etc.). Define/regulate the use of electric vehicles (Bicycles, skateboards, etc.) within public parks
and pedestrian bridges. What will be done to protect public safety?
00:51:28 Kathleen Andrews: @David, I agree, let’s plan, given electric vehicles are here to stay.
00:55:54 David Tanner: The City’s lowest LOS should be “C”. The City should achieve this through increased
transit, ride sharing and use of alternative means of transportation. Just what the State wants! The
City should not continue to accommodate the burden of increased vehicles that will result from
population growth.
00:56:37 Jasmine King (Technical Support):Draft Circulation Element: http://www.newportbeachca.gov/
DraftCEUpdate
00:59:01 Adriana Fourcher: David, mass transit has failed. See any OCTA bus. Empty. Time is Money, Money
is Time.
263
3Initial Draft of Circulation Element Workshop
00:59:36 Jasmine King (Technical Support): City of Newport Beach Website: https://www.newportbeachca.
gov/
00:59:48 Jasmine King (Technical Support): To find more information on the project, copy and paste this link
into your browser: www.newporttogether.com
01:01:54 Joyce Lau: parking has been a challenge for visitors and NB residences. Since lands in NB is rather
developed, have the city considered building multi-level underground parking?
01:03:13 David Tanner: Staff knows that the City Council is not supportive of widening WCH. Staff should
acknowledge this to the public. Staff should identify the process Staff anticipates going forward
for WCH since the Draft Circulation continues the policy of widening WCH. This should
be acknowledged and discussed at this meeting. If Staff believes the City Council is supportive of
continued widening of WCH, Staff should tell the public this.
01:04:57 Jasmine King (Technical Support): If you joined the workshop by phone, dial *9 to raise your hand.
01:08:46 P Matheis: I do not believe that widening West Coast Highway to accommodate traffic has a benefit
other than some level of traffic relief. However, it unfortunately serves to divide the communities
in the city and this very negative impact should be considered.
01:08:58 David Tanner: I know mass transit has failed. Do we let the States Housing laws and policies ruin the
City? Or do we say NO!
01:10:19 Adriana Fourcher:NB has a high tax base. The assumptions in the plan are satisfying the State’s
and SCAG’s policy agendas but ignore the primary forms of transportation of the majority
of affluent and older population. Some residents might bike but not enough to replace a
traffic lane. Also there is a difference between recrea
01:11:19 Adriana Fourcher: Recreational biking and actually replacing a car lane.
01:11:34 skeith dewine: In addition to electric vehicles we need to anticipate automated robotic delivery
systems. We have Google in our backyard and over next five years their use will grow exponentially.
In addition delivery via drones will grow really fast - Skeith
01:14:27 David Tanner: Skeith - you are spot on about the future of autonomus drones. Weneeda MPAH of the sky’s.
01:14:34 skeith dewine: residential vehicle vs commercial vehicle charging systems will also have to be anticipated...
01:16:32 P Matheis: I apologize for the question: Does the Circulation element have a comprehensive safety
component to account for the intersection of vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians?
01:17:39 Kathleen Andrews: How long did it take between the city realizing that more electric vehicle charging
points were needed, and when the new charging stations were in place and able to be used?Electric
vehicle use will be increasing a lot over coming decades. If the city is playing catch-up between charging
stations being needed and having them in place, what is the pace of installation, is the timeframe
between the need and the charging station decreasing?
01:22:50 Jose Castaneda: Thank you, Tony. I ask because Director Campbell was enthusiastically
promoting the 73 fwy improvement, which is an example of where induced demand would need
to be studied had it been constructed on in today’s time.
264
4Initial Draft of Circulation Element Workshop
01:23:18 Linda Kraemer: Thank You for looking at other modes of transportation. Support our businesses by
making cities more walk/car friendly. We already have too many cars in So Cal. Thank You.
01:24:44 tony petros: Mr. Castaneda, while admittedly not as rigorous as the new VMT threshold methodology,
the EIR/EIS for the SR-73 did include a growth inducing section for disclosure purposes.
01:25:34 Mary Ann Soden: Re the delivery by drones comments. I encourage the city to promote quiet
skies. The airport is bad enough, and we are losing ground with the general aviation airlines. Please no
drones.
01:29:24 Kathleen Andrews: @LindaK: <two thumbs up>
01:29:45 P Matheis: I have never seen the shuttle idea work in Newport Beach as far back as 1975. Maybe it
could work, but by my observation it has been used to appease the political pressure.
01:31:31 Kathleen Andrews: Could someone post the link to the city’s Bicycle Master plan into chat?
01:32:18 skeith dewine: In Japan there are these bicycle wind tunnels that aid in faster transport on a bicycle. In
the process everyone wanted to try them in Japan and increased more bicycle riding for the rapid
experience rather than driving. Something like this down Newport Blvd could discourage driving into the
city. ...Check the Ted Talks or videos to see what I am trying to explain
01:32:22 Benjamin Zdeba: Bicycle Master Plan: https://www.newportbeachca.gov/government/
departments/public-works/bicycle-master-plan
01:32:33 Jose Castaneda: @
01:32:44 Kathleen Andrews: Thanks Benjamin.
01:35:17 Jose Castaneda:@Skeith, Can you share a link to the Japanese bike tunnel? I can’t find any references on
google.
01:36:16 skeith dewine: I cant pull the window down to get to my windows file without disconnecting at moment
01:38:05 Mary Ann Soden: Do EV charging stations generate revenue for the City?
01:44:31 skeith dewine: I think parking would be easier with tower vending park machines - stack the cars
upwards in machines. I am sure there are a lot of companies now manufacturing these giant machines
for parking?storing cars
01:46:40 skeith dewine: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rcJDsiNiKI
01:49:59 P Matheis:I hear a good deal about regional traffic planing but very little about an integrated,
computer controlled traffic management system that functions across all of Orange County.
01:54:00 P Matheis:I don’t mean to press the issue but Irvine is one of the four city’s bordering Newport
Beach. If traffic management includes all of Orange County please address Laguna Beach, Huntington
Beach and Costa Mesa regarding integrated management?
02:01:20 P Matheis: Thank you for the answer, that is no, Newport Beach does not have an integrated and
coordinated traffic management program with LB, HB and Costa Mesa. This looks like it could be
included in the new plan.
265
5Initial Draft of Circulation Element Workshop
02:03:27 barbara george: Thanks You Debra!
02:04:09 Linda Kraemer: Fyi, Costa Mesa is doing a pedestrian/walk audit and parking study right now. https://
cmpmp-wa.weebly.com/
02:06:13 skeith dewine: https://news.mit.edu/2013/mapping-the-logistics-of-megacities-0909
02:07:37 Jasmine King (Technical Support): https://www.newporttogether.com/
02:07:59 Jasmine King (Technical Support): City of Newport Beach Website: https://www.newportbeachca.
gov/
02:08:15 Jasmine King (Technical Support): Draft Circulation Element: http://www.newportbeachca.gov/
DraftCEUpdate
02:11:34 P Matheis: Very informative. You all have done a great job!
02:14:40 Christian Mendez (Kearns & West): Draft Circulation Element: http://www.newportbeachca.gov/
DraftCEUpdate
02:16:06 Linda Kraemer: Thanks for a great meeting!
02:17:03 Adriana Fourcher: Thank you
02:17:20 Benjamin Zdeba: GPUpdate@newportbeachca.gov
02:17:28 skeith dewine: FOUND IT!
02:17:32 skeith dewine: https://www.csmonitor.com/1998/1119/111998.feat.feat.7.html
02:18:04 Christian Mendez (Kearns & West): https://www.newporttogether.com/
02:18:20 Jonathan Langford: Thanks!
266
Circulation Element
Update
Planning Commission
September 8, 2022
1
Planning Commission - September 8, 2022 Item No. 5a - Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)
Context
•The Circulation Element is a planning document that
establishes the City’s long-term vision for its own
mobility.
•It is a policy document, not a project document.
Statement of Intent. Specific construction projects are
not part of the element. (CIP)
2
Planning Commission - September 8, 2022 Item No. 5a - Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)
Background
•In January 2020, the City Council directed staff to update
the Housing Element to meet RHNA requirements, and
to prepare a simultaneous update to Circulation Element
to meet State laws and mandates.
•In April 2020, the City Council approved a contract
including services of LSA Associates for the Circulation
Element Update preparation.
3
Planning Commission - September 8, 2022 Item No. 5a - Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)
PC Review
Eight Planning Commission Meetings
November 19, 2020
•Circulation Element 101 Presentation
December 2020 –March 2021
•Monthly Status Reports on Update
March 18, 2021
•Presentation of Initial Draft of Circulation Element
4
Planning Commission - September 8, 2022 Item No. 5a - Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)
Public Involvement
November 23, 2020
•Circulation Element 101 = Workshop # 1
December 15, 2020
•Themes = Workshop # 2
December 16, 2020
•Themes = Workshop # 3
February 10, 2021
•Visioning = Workshop # 4
5
Planning Commission - September 8, 2022 Item No. 5a - Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)
Public Involvement
March 12, 2021
•Initial Draft posted on City website
April 5, 2021
•Discussion of Initial Draft = Workshop # 5
Spring 2021 –Summer 2022
•Minor revisions to Draft document
•City Council focus on Housing Element
July 12, 2022
•Final Draft document posted on City website
6
Planning Commission - September 8, 2022 Item No. 5a - Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)
Update to Goals and Policies
•Community Document
•Five (5) well-attended Public Workshops
•Extensive and documented public input
•New Goals & Policies based on input from the public and
the Planning Commission
•Incorporates the mandates of State law with new and
updated Goals & Policies
•Consistent with SCAG Regional Transportation Plan
7
Planning Commission - September 8, 2022 Item No. 5a - Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)
Mandates of State Law
•AB 1358 -Complete Streets Act of 2008 Requires cities
to amend their circulation elements to plan for a multimodal
network to meet needs of all users (pedestrians, cyclists,
motorists, ADA, children, seniors, commercial, transit).
•SB 743 –Vehicle Miles Traveled New CEQA metric for
measuring traffic impacts of development.
•SB 32 & SB 375 -Global Warming & Climate Protection
Climate action goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through
transportation planning.
8
Planning Commission - September 8, 2022 Item No. 5a - Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)
Key Policies
•Minimize conflict w/ new modes of transit (e.g., e-bikes)
•Require bicycle amenities in new development
•Review parking requirements in Municipal Code
•Prepare Complete Streets Master Plan
•Safe System Approach –Annual safety review of network
•Monitor land development in adjacent jurisdictions
•Regular school coordination meetings
•Emergency evacuation map to be prepared
9
Planning Commission - September 8, 2022 Item No. 5a - Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)
Key Policies (Cont.)
•Incorporate current Bicycle Master Plan and include
projects in CIP.
•Curbside management = drop-off zones for uber/lyft,
valet and delivery zones.
•Monitor autonomous vehicles and plan infrastructure.
•Install more EV charging stations on city property +
incentivize private installations.
•No changes proposed to Master Plan of Streets and
Highways. Traffic Study with Land Use Element.
10
Planning Commission - September 8, 2022 Item No. 5a - Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)
•Basis to approve the Update at the present time:
•Avoids potential legal issues with not including a Policy
(and planning) for Complete Streets in General Plan.
•In review of local development, State will comment on
project consistency with Circulation plans and policies.
•Incorporating VMT Policy will maintain consistency with
CEQA policy and CEQA Practice in State reviews.
•Meets State goals for Global Warming & Climate Change
•New Policies include public input on trending topics.
Summary
11
Planning Commission - September 8, 2022 Item No. 5a - Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)
Recommendation
•Adopt Resolution No.
PC2022-025 recommending
adoption of the General
Plan Circulation Element
Update to the City Council.
•October 11 –City Council
Study Session
•October 25 –City Council
Review and Adoption 1112
Planning Commission - September 8, 2022 Item No. 5a - Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)
Questions?
Thank you!
Tony Brine, City Traffic Engineer
Tony Petros, LSA Associates
GPUpdate@newportbeachca.gov
13
Planning Commission - September 8, 2022 Item No. 5a - Additional Materials Presented at Meeting by Staff Circulation Element Update (PA2017-141)