HomeMy WebLinkAboutZA2012-009 Ceiba Place ModificationRESOLUTION NO. ZA2012 -009
A RESOLUTION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR OF THE
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH APPROVING MODIFICATION
PERMIT NO. 2012 -005 TO ALLOW AN ADDTION TO A
NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 807 CEIBA
PLACE (PA2012 -016)
THE ZONING ADMINSTRATOR OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HEREBY FINDS AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FACTS.
1. An application was filed by Andy and Ya -Lei Betz with respect to property located at 807
Ceiba Place, and legally described as Lot 26 of Tract 5018 requesting approval of a
Modification Permit to allow an addition that exceeds 10% to a single -unit dwelling that is
nonconforming because the interior width of the two -car garage is 19 feet, 1 inch where
Section 20.40.090 (Parking Standards for Residential Uses) of the Zoning Code requires
a minimum width of 20 feet for a lot wider than 40 feet.
2. The subject property is located within the R -1 -6,000 (Single -Unit Residential) Zoning
District and the General Plan Land Use Element category is RS -D (Single -Unit
Residential Detached).
3. The subject property is not located within the Coastal Zone.
4. A public hearing was held on February 29, 2012, in the City Hall Council Chambers,
3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and
purpose of the meeting was given in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal
Code. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the
Zoning Administrator at this meeting.
SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DETERMINATION.
1. This project has been determined to be categorically exempt under the requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15301 (Class 1 —
Existing Facilities).
2. Class 1 provides for additions to existing structures provided that the addition will not
result in an increase of more than 10,000 square feet; and the project is in an area where
all public services and facilities are available to allow for maximum development
permissible in the General Plan and the area in which the project is located is not
environmentally sensitive.
Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2012 -009
Page 2 of 6
SECTION 3. REQUIRED FINDINGS.
1. In accordance with Section 20.52.050.E (Findings and decision) of the Newport Beach
Municipal Code, the following findings and facts in support of the findings for a
Modification Permit are set forth:
Finding
A. The requested modification will be compatible with existing development in the
neighborhood.
Facts in Support of Finding
1. The modification permit will allow an addition to a single - family residence within a single -
family residential subdivision.
2. The applicant is proposing a 45- percent addition to the existing structure. The proposed
addition will comply with all of the development standards, including lot coverage, height,
and setbacks, and will not intensify or alter the existing nonconformity.
3. The resulting structure will be 2,835 square feet and similar in character and size to other
homes located in the neighborhood.
Finding
B. The granting of the modification is necessary due to the unique physical characteristic(s)
of the property and /or structure, and /or characteristics of the use.
Facts in Support of Finding
1. The dwelling units in this area were constructed with garages that were in compliance
with the Zoning Code at the time of construction.
2. Given the design of the existing structure and proposed scope of work, bringing the
garage into conformance would require a significant expansion in the scope and cost of
the project.
3. The Zoning Code specifies minimum interior dimensions for parking space, which vary
by lot width. Although, the existing garage is nonconforming in regards to the minimum
width dimension required for lots greater than 40 feet wide, it is consistent with the
width requirements for garages on lots less than 40 feet wide and still provides two
useable garage spaces. Thereby, the existing nonconforming garage meets the intent
of the Zoning Code by providing adequate parking but is deficient as to meeting the
minimum width requirement. Approval of the Modification Permit to allow the 45- percent
addition is reasonable given the use of the structure.
Tmplt: 03/08/11
Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2012 -009
Page 3 of 6
Finding
C. The granting of the modification is necessary due to practical difficulties associated with
the property and that the strict application of the Zoning Code results in physical
hardships that are inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Code.
Facts in Support of Finding
1. The existing two -car garage was in compliance with the Zoning Code at the time of
original construction. However, as a result of amendments to the Zoning Code, the
garage is now substandard in size in regards to width, but does provide adequate
space to park two vehicles.
Finding
D. There are no alternatives to the modification permit that could provide similar benefits to
the applicant with less potential detriment to surrounding owners and occupants, the
neighborhood, or to the general public.
Facts in Support of Finding
1. The alternatives would require that the applicant bring the garage into conformance by
expanding the scope of the project or requesting a Variance for a setback
encroachment.
2. Approval of the Modification Permit allows the applicant to the continued use of the two -
car garage which has not proven detrimental to the occupants or neighbors.
Finding
E. The granting of the modification would not be detrimental to public health, safety, or
welfare, to the occupants of the property, nearby properties, the neighborhood, or the
City, or result in a change in density or intensity that would be inconsistent with the
provisions of this Zoning Code.
Facts in Support of Finding
1. Though the width of the two -car garage will be less the minimum required by the Zoning
Code, it provides sufficient area for use as a two -car garage.
2. The existing driveway area is large enough to provide a single, additional parking space.
3. The project will not increase the nonconforming status and will comply with all other
provisions of the R -1 -6,000 Zoning District.
4. The existing nonconforming garage has not proven to be detrimental to the surrounding
neighborhood.
Tmplt: 03/08/11
Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2012 -009
Page 4 of 6
5. The addition will result in a home similar or smaller in scale to other homes in the
neighborhood.
SECTION 4. DECISION.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. The Zoning Administrator of the City of Newport Beach hereby approves Modification
Permit No. MD2012 -005, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached
hereto and incorporated by reference.
2. Modification Permit applications do not become effective until 14 days following the date
of action. Prior to the effective date, the applicant or any interested party may appeal the
decision of the Zoning Administrator to the Planning Commission by submitting a written
appeal application to the Community Development Director. For additional information on
filing an appeal, contact the Planning Division at 949 - 644 -3200.
APPROVED, AND,,QDOPTED THIS 29TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2012.
0
, Zoning Administrator
TmpIC 03/08/11
Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2012 -009
Page 5 of 6
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, floor
plans and elevations, except as noted in the following conditions.
2. If any of the existing public improvements surrounding the site are damaged by private
work, new concrete sidewalk, curb and gutter, street pavement, and other public
improvements will be required by the City at the time of private construction
completion. Said determination and the extent of the repair work shall be made at the
discretion of the Public Works inspector.
3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Division
an additional copy of the approved architectural plans for inclusion in the Modification
Permit file. The plans shall be identical to those approved by all City departments for
building permit issuance. The approved copy shall include architectural sheets only
and shall be reduced in size to 11- inches by 17- inches. The plans shall accurately
depict the elements approved by this Modification Permit and shall highlight the
approved elements such that they are readily discernible from other elements of the
plans.
4. A building permit shall be obtained prior to commencement of the construction.
5. A copy of the conditions of approval shall be incorporated into the Building Division
and field sets of plans prior to issuance of the building permits.
6. All work performed within the public right -of -way shall be reviewed and approved by
the Public Works Department under an encroachment permit/agreement, if required.
7. The applicant shall reconstruct the existing broken and /or otherwise damaged
concrete driveway approach along the Ceiba Place frontage per City Standard STD -
162 -L.
8. A new sewer cleanout shall be installed on the existing sewer lateral per City Standard
STD - 406 -L. Said sewer cleanout shall be located within the public right -of -way.
9. The proposed addition and related work shall comply with the California Building Code
and all adopted local amendments.
10. This approval shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the approval date, as
specified in Section 20.93.050 (A) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Prior to the
expiration date of this approval, an extension may be approved in accordance with
Section 20.93.050 (B) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Requests for an extension
must be in writing.
Tmplt: 03/08111
Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2012 -009
Page 6 of 6
11. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the applicant shall indemnify, defend and hold
harmless City, its City Council, its boards and commissions, officials, officers, employees,
and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, obligations, damages,
actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and
expenses (including without limitation, attorney's fees, disbursements and court costs) of
every kind and nature whatsoever which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly
or indirectly) to City's approval of the Betz Residence Addition including, but not limited
to, Modification No. MD2012 -005 (PA2012 -016). This indemnification shall include, but
not be limited to, damages awarded against the City, if any, costs of suit, attorneys' fees,
and other expenses incurred in connection with such claim, action, causes of action, suit
or proceeding whether incurred by applicant, City, and /or the parties initiating or bringing
such proceeding. The applicant shall indemnify the City for all of City's costs, attorneys'
fees, and damages which City incurs in enforcing the indemnification provisions set forth
in this condition. The applicant shall pay to the City upon demand any amount owed to
the City pursuant to the indemnification requirements prescribed in this condition.
Tmplt: 03/08/11