The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10 - Appeal of a Limited Term Permit for the Aeronutronic Ford Soil Vapor Remediation (PA2022-0180) - PowerPoint (Appellant)•—� SVE System 94 Hartford Drive Kevin Solomita July 25, 2023 Item No. 10 Examples Given by WSP of SVE Systems in Residential Areas... 1) Sunny Dry Cleaners (SVE system is located 500 feet away from residences) 2) Campus Cleaners (SVE system is located 100 feet away from residences) 3) Fort Ord Military Base Housing... — -Lr v - All - � i�_ 41 ILI F. - � �— •fir' mi r • This is what WSP created AFTER our complaints were received in January • Prior to our complaints, we continuously heard the building needed to go behind our house simply due to parking *This is still true for options 1 and 3 • At the community meeting on June 8th, now stated it will add 2-2 % years to relocate ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS Summary ---MRPNW IDa# INVO&M Pserrn ig � rW Powgr Gonnoclion Oxon Oorrr on {.omrrrsJoetlrr 11ur1es Prue" CMP*K11y Compierltr Campindty 9a)ridgv Park- 5 smell - Camnxlnily Muler N3i2l. Publi=mmmenl 1 syslems in Parking' spots &7.7.iR-2. Public mmfing gel W.21 LEnv PACE u'r MCdum HOA nio rut appr—a use or pmidnq spaces. - Proposed by Coy on vi E?2 - Disrupt— cl marurc lend —ping and 9ayndge Pads Lanoscapsd cl—ge g Areas hehseen homes ln—aeeiblilK far Caren--t n equpr-fool I#gh laR Mod in hicdum Does n4 soh•cifa p—hiry to homes W- - Praposed by Cif' on 2115f73 Haridgle Park-2-3 Pmking - All poftig revs >mid progecr lirnim are a spots in aaslr half of raslrOed by MQA MOW PAed ur L— Lox Loti' Eornmunl►y- -Parl3ng rnpaGtz are ccr zrm ei aver) ptblic meeting - ee Pmpod by CRy an 9'1i.23 - PJor1'imm corner parhrg arse less 9a}rrdga Park Lager m i Ireatrnrnl system aooes 3 4 - SignilicQarted anl incrrase in linger feel of La+r Medun Lox • Irgh Parking spats rlorlh�sl br_hinq ragarad and —a—Inn duraeon owner of neighbDrhood -Vahaga drop aver audrronal dis'arce nal I= code - Discussion wfh CILy abcu` soriuck h Dison Jhr requirernrnls deemed this Oumbk- 91oon Eon.t,—Ilon moratorrm Lax L— la' I c i hlCd 11 - Hor7iern pmomed ay City I e.21. 6 AlongCwmy i:lrb{naih— inreasbla due io space irrit and relnim is Lalr Medun La hied in Lax wall impact -Sa�lherrt nr—sd3l. a. io look of space - ub rc meabnq 11f4rZl and 1 e181013 Caun:ry Club9raa- -City LTPproceesrasulledincornmran. from 7 ad,a=Cr1 to W Plerdord I#gh Lan hied in Lax Lax (FirielF$fL3Pd P71P1 3noa sl msrdenb Wlh ooMc aea.n tl're lcG dam •Infeasible: • not possible to do easily or conveniently • It is not OUR job to take the burden to make it easier or more convenient for the people who caused the problem in the first place Approximately 40 feet between roadway and wall -Why would this impede on moratorium Would not obstruct view of motorists as claimed in planning commission meeting City is in charge of moratorium ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS -BISON AVENUE ALONG BISON AVE Locations on Bison Ave not feasible to meet required ROW setbacks • Would require significant grading and potentially impact stability of existing retaining walls- • Moratorium along Bison for any trenching work. • Access from a major thoroughfare -AM ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS- Country Club Drive Northern -Would require significant grading and potentially impact stability of existing retaining walls, . space to maintain sidewalk _ throughway 44 i View fr ---� between Co ve- looking South al-u n g the r Idd3,LI lei ftl 1 rlr &^F of 1 e d^r-iJ M+ 8 4-I I.d3IRrgh11 I Ch?%1.1XhG n 1 r1bi 1 n F r 1 r TERNAME ANALVSI -RA RID E PARK Parking areas: ■ Heavily impacted and/or close to residences_ • The HOA has denied use of any of these Parking areas even for temporary field visits. Staff park One proposed location that was "infeasible" due to parking and not pictured -Take up two spots with building -Have two parallel parking spots -Parking spots lost= ZERO A 4 F: -Take up three spots with building -Have two parallel parking spots -Parking spots lost= ONE 4 11� -Reconfigure Island -Remove tree -Move Mailboxes Parking spots lost= RO (Possibly gain one or two) The Proposed Location t The Proposed Location • Too close to a home (3 feet) violating 8-foot setback requirements • Too close to the sidewalk (nearly touching the sidewalk) • Too close to a water main Called a "compromise" by the city at the last meeting • Encroachment agreement now needed • Have to remove 50+ year old pine trees • Have to move our air conditioner • Directly outside our main living area window • On slab without deepened footings • No examples of SVE systems have ever been placed this close to a home occupied by residents