HomeMy WebLinkAbout00 - Non-Agenda - CorrespondenceReceived after Agenda Printed
February 13, 2024
Non -Agenda Item
From:
Rieff. Kim
To:
Mulvey, Jennifer
Subject:
FW: General public comment - non agenda item for Feb 13,
Date:
February 13, 2024 2:11:45 PM
Attachments:
imaoe001.ona
From: bgriffith sclfinance.com <bgriffith@sclfinance.com>
Sent: February 13, 2024 2:10 PM
To: Avery, Brad <bavery@newportbeachca.gov>; Weigand, Erik <eweigand@newportbeachca.gov>
Cc: Dept - City Council <CityCouncil@newportbeachca.gov>; Kleiman, Lauren
<Ikleiman@newportbeachca.gov>
Subject: General public comment - non agenda item for Feb 13,
XTERNAL =AILI DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
safe.
Hello City Council
I wanted to bring to your attention about the issue that mooring holders are facing. Working
with the harbor commission but we do not feel we have their attention.
Charging 4 times the rate to people with moorings vs people with home docs for the
same amount of the harbor, and now proposing to charge 10 times more for people with
moorings.
The cartoon was in a newspaper and the City of Newport Beach is looking bad among the
voting residents
�he City of Newport Beach & Discrimination toward mooring holders —
Signs of discrimination
Unequal Treatment: Mooring holders feel they are being treated unfairly compared to others in
similar situations such as being charged higher fees for their mooring. This perception of
unequal treatment can lead to feelings of frustration and injustice.
Institutional Discrimination: There's a belief among mooring holders that the city government is
systematically discriminating against them by charging them higher fees. This form of
discrimination is seen as embedded within the institutional framework of the city's policies and
practices.
Lack of Representation: Mooring holders may feel that they lack adequate representation in the
political sphere, maki ng it difficult for them to advocate far their interests and address issues of
discrimination and unequal treatment effectively.
It's important for the pity to address these concerns seriously, as perceptions of discrimination
and institutional bias can have significant implications for trust in government and social
cohesion. Open dialogue transparency, and efforts to address systemic inequalities are essential
in addressing these issues effectively.
OUP MJ APPKASIAL ddU
ReSULT 19 AIJ OFFS909f
MOOKYJ6 PRICe WKe OF
i AJUM NT#IK
TO FIVE
TO PDFr�UOPED
PfrC P
THKAK
V