Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout875 SAN CLEMENTE875 San Clemente v OUTSTANDING ZONING CORRECTIONS July 11, 1996 PLAN CHECK NO.37G-96 875 SAN CLEMENTE MITIGATION MEASURE #10 All development shall include street and security lighting (in parking lots and estrian walkway areas) which is energy conserving. -A lighting plan shall be submitted for all development which demonstrates compliance with this measure. The plan shall be reviewed by the Planning Department and approved by the Department of Public Works. Prior to the issuance of building permits, submit a Letter from the Lighting Engineer that the lighting system has been designed to Title 24 requirements and incorporated into the building plans. Prior to final occupancy, a follow-up letter will be required that states that the lights have been installed per Title 24 requirements and the plans specifications. HOLD ON FINAL #11 Residential, commercial and office development shall be landscaped with an emphasis on drought resistant plan species which will shade buildings and reduce water and energy consumption during the summer. A landscape plan shall be submitted for all development which demonstrates compliance with this measure. The plan shall be reviewed by the Planning Department and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. A landscape plan has been submitted to the Building and Planning Department. For expediency, a separate landscape plan should be routed to the following departments for review and signature: Planning Department (Genia Garcia), General Services (Marci Lomeli), and Public Works (Dick Hoffstadt). HOLD ON FINAL PENDING FIELD CHECK. C#51-53A mal letter to be received by the Planning Department from heologist/Paleontologist for on -site monitoring during grading activities. HOLD 4 ON FINAL. t #77 Brochures (such as the "Nonpoint Source Pollution" brochures published by the nge County Flood Control District) shall be distributed at the time of initial sale or lease of residential and commercial properties. These brochures shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Newport Beach prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. Submit brochures for review and approval prior to final. HOLD ON FINAL 0 is Total number of units - 245 Building Gross Square Footage - 403,770 Garage Areas Gross Square Footage 284,528 Auxiliary Buildings: Recreation Bldg. 4,362 Pool Bldg. 934 Guardhouse 273 Total Gross Square Footage 693,867 Parking Spaces Required: 2 spaces per unit x 245 units 490 spaces .5 guest space per unit x 245 units 123 spaces Total spaces required 613 Parking Spaces Provided 626 Surplus Spaces 13 H2 SHARE FE Of/ SAN JOAQUIN E February 27, 1996 PLANNING PLAN -CHECK CORRECTIONS PLAN CHECK NO.37G-96 375 SAN CLEMENTE MITIGATION MEASURES - CIOSA AGREEMENT & W Measure No. 10 Street and security lighting. Submit'lighting plan to be reviewed by �Egri(�l.Q%J the Public Works and Planning Departments. HOLD ON FINAL i .4< Measure No 11 Landscape Plan to Planniong, Public Works and General Services. HOLD ON FINAL. 1 , Measure No. 12 Acoustical Analysis t Department. PRIOR TO THE A O�" ' \ ISSUANCE OF G IN ND BUILDING PERMITS. X� Measure No. 13 Same as above 'NOVMeasure No. 14 Need to include acoustical barriers on Grading Plan. ��JJ �� Measure No. 51-53 An archeologist and paleontologist must submit a letter to the Planning Department confirming presence on the site during grading activities. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF GRADING AND BUILDING PERMITS easure No. 71 Approval of Police Department of all site plans and access plans. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS M i NOTE: No further revisions to the Rough Grading can be issued until a letter �v is received from the archeologist/paleontologist showing compliance with Mitigation Measures and Condition No. 31 of Tentative Tract Map No. 15178. Genia Garcia Associate Planner . 1� Aov A.e44 0. 1 + is / SA- I� 4 February 13, 1996 PLAN CHECK #37G96 375 SAN CLEMENTE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP #15187 CONDMON DEPT. ACTION 1. Map Recordation Public Works Plans Approval 2. Map Recordation Public Works Plans Approval 3 " {{ tf t< 4. Improvements Public Works Plans Approval 5. " " H 6. Sewers Utilities Plans Approval 7. Water " " 8. Street design Public Works Plans Approval Traffic Engineer 9. Sight distance Traffic Engineer Plans Approval 10. Private drive " " 11. Vehicle Code Police, Public Works Plans Approval 12. Control gate Public Works, Fire Plans Approval 13. Easements Public Works Plans approval 14. Santa Maria Public Works Plans Approval 15. On -site parking Traffic Engineer Plans Approval 16, Roads Public Works Plans Approval 17. Street drainage Public Works " 18. Hydrology/hydraulic " 19. Water fee " n 20. Sewer facilities Public Works, Planning Plans Approval Orange County Sanitation, Letter PRIOR TO ISSUANCE Utilities Dept. OF GRADING PERMITS 21. Sanitation fee Public Works Plans Approval 22. Plan Check fee Public Works To be paid 23. Construction work Public Works Plans Approval 24. Underground utilities Public Works Plans Approval 25. Fire systems Fire Plans Approval 26. Acoustical Study Planning Study required HOLD ON FINAL 27. Mechanical Equipment Planning Study required HOLD ON FINAL r 28. Screening -equipment Planning Study required HOLD ON FINAL 29. Interior noise Planning Study required HOLD ON FINAL 30. Water/fire hydrants Fire/Public Works Plans Approval 31. Archeo/Paleo Planning Letter from archeo/paleo PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF PERMITS 32. Edison transformers Public Works Plans Approval 33. N/A 34. N/A -2- ' RESIDENTIAL ZONFNG CORRECTIONS Teleplione: By.Genia Garcia Associate Planner By. ssociate Planner Proposed By: Date0�'027 Districting Map No: Corrections Required: Land Use Element Page Plan Check No: yWA!Q By:Aziz Aslami Associate Planner Legal Description Lot Block Section _ Tract Verify legal description with Public Works Covenant required. Please have owner's signature notarized on the attached document and rety�rn to Lot Size Zone I/ lxetii_�Z No. of Units Alloweg,2� Proposed _ Buildable Area Maxium Lot Maximum Structural Area (Area including exterior walls, parking). x buildable area. � A46, y(s) on one level and required Proposed Structural Area: / x buildable area. ,,// Provide tissue overlay of calculations verifying proposed square footage. /G Open Space Area cu.ft. (Volume of space equal to buildable width x height limit x six). This area must be at least six feet in -ate direction (6'.x 6'x-6% and open on at least two sides, or one side and one end, unless otherwise specified in Zoning Code. ,r . Reauired Setbacks Front Rear Right Side Left Side Note: The following may not be permitted.to encroach into required setback: Balconies Fireplaces Decks Bay/Garden Windows Provide floor plan(s), fully dimensioned, showing all room uses. le plot plan, fully dimensioned, showing: location of all buildings, and distance to property lines. distance from face of curb to front property line (verify with Public Works) second and third floor footprints (if applicable) all projections (i.e. fireplaces, bay windows), label distance(s) to PL(s) distance between buildings Height Limitation Measured from natural grade to mid -point of roof. Code allows an additional 5'0" to the peak of the ridge height.- - Allowable midpoint/Flat n X Allowable ridge height Dimension all elevations from natural grade to: O � 7Gei Label natural grade and finished grade on all elevations. 1 i 1 May be in Flood Hazard Area. Check with Building Department for minimum finish floor elevations. Remarks k Required Parking: clear inside minimum dimension 9'-4" x 19' single space g' x 16' third/fourth space(s) Label clear inside dimensions of provided parking spaces i— Is demolition proposed?C) Fairshare Contribution —*—San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor SPECIAL APPROVAL REQUIRED THROUGH: 17'-6" x 19' two $paces to WA Please indicate any discretionary approval numbers on the plans an ftcorporate the attached; excerpt of minutes and list of findings and conditions into he bluclineldrra�w/ings approval letter into the blucline drawings e g� �� / T� Modifications Committee: Indicate Approval No. on Plans Modification required Planning Commission/City Council: Use Permit: No._ Variance: No Rcsubdivisionfrmct: No — Site Plan Review: No.— Amendm Other Public Works: EasemcuUEncroachnnenl Perm' Subdivision Engineer Traffic Engineer Approval of Landscape Plans Significant Links Building Department: Grading Engineer Parks Department: 09— Approval of Landscape Plans i ilancous 3. Chimney (and chimney caps etc.) heights permitted only as required by U.B.C.or manufacturer specifications plus 4 additional 12" maximum for cap/spark arrestor. 4. NOTE ON PLANS: Pools, spas, walls, fences, patio covers and otherfrcestanding structures require separate reviews and permits. Exempt, Because, Categorical Exclusion No. (C.E.O.) Effective bate (Note: Building permits may be issued 10 days following issuance of C.E.Q.) Approval In Concept(AIC) No. (Note: File 3 sets of plans: site, floor, and elevations) Waivcr # Effective Dale Coastal Development Permit No. Effective bate i qL- 5. Association Approval (Advisory). Issuance of a Building Permit by tine City does not relieve applicant of legal requirement to observe covenants, conditions and restrictions which may be recorded against the property or to obtain community association approval of plans. R$MARKS: .y_ NOTE: It is the responsibi104the appiicnni to circulate their plans and obtain the necessary approvals from the departments checked above. Ifyou have questions rrgardingyour application please contact me at (714) 644-3200. ..ira,.r•: y � �� _ ; F0RMPr%rMVCOR.DOCRev. Il96 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.8915 November 19, 1996 Gannon Design Moira I Boynton 112 East Chapman Avenue Suite G Orange, CA 92666 Subject: "The Colony" Apartments, 875 San Clement, Tract 15178 Dear Moira: Earlier this year, the City became aware of a possible discrepancy in the numbering system of the above referenced project. The City had asked your office to change the numbering system to be consistent with our city numbering system regarding odd and even numbers on the north and south side of the street. You were kind enough to provide us with a new numbering plan that is consistent with our City numbering system. This letter is to clarify the established addressing system for the Colony project. Buildings 1 and 2 are located on the north side of the Colony Plaza street. Buildings 3 and 4 are located on the south side of the Colony Plaza street. The address for the leasing office is 5100 Colony Plaza. The address for the guard house is 5102 Colony Plaza. The address for the pool building is 5104 Colony Plaza Buildings 1, 2, 3, 4 are addressed using: 1 st number of the address represents the Building number 2nd number of the address represents the floor level 3rd and 4th number of the address represents the unit number with even numbers on the north side of Colony Plaza in Buildings 1 and 2, and odd numbers on the south side of Colony Plaza in Buildings3 and 4. Please be advised that the Newport Beach Fire Department must approve the final signs for the building numbering prior to the completion of the project. Section 9.04270 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code requires appropriate street address numbers on each building. 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach It is your responsibility to notify all affected agencies (i.e., Post Office, utility companies, etc.) of all new addresses. If you have any questions or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, BY 2ZZZZ4--z A�--) Genia Garcia, Associate Planner cc: Building Permit Counter Building Department - records Fire Department - records Public Works Department - Subdivision Engineer Police Department - records Planning Department - records Administrative Services - records Management Infon Co, o- TT n C 14to 15LO 1210 I L1 O J,Jzo 14A I4aq m20 132.E 13a4 I224 12.aa I I 12;a4 11A 11aa IIa4 7a",'D G 1 Co (, o t\j Co L 441� 441_ 9 r--1 42I11 k� .44�1 19 2 4a1 STAIRS 4111 4ta1 4�5 44a3 4215 4y�3 4113- 41 a3 4413. 41-3 4z133l\,17�r 44 a5 43 4113 3 �t 421 I 4,q o I 4111 �34201 09 4�9 �-- .44o I dro,3 r - %Al 4 1447 ,5 44o 4207 4305 4205 43,03 1203 4107 419>5 41,03 N � .-_- 3 03 3� 8'S 34n7 3zo 33J. 32v3 3305 3307 3209 31,03 3Ze'S < 3207 310% 31/. 3.A t 31 �S�o7 301 3y3 3 ! 3z1f 3 1 3 a3 `sL�G y r 31,41 SiIaIRS - 3439 3435 333� 34,37 3335 32:3 3337 3235 3139 32:37 3135 i -, al3a r 3319 32/`I 331.7 31, / 9 3217 32:a1- 31 A), 33a3 3ZA3 3►e'l.3 was 31 o't.S 34A7 33a� 3za�_ M33 3333 3q-bt9 3233 3I 3?a9 313 3231 32.aa9 31$1 31k9 _ IIZAXQc RL•t,iMivnu dV PLANNING DEPARTMENT Ms. Genia Garcia CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. AM MAR 2 51996 PM Newport Beach, CA 92663-3384 718191M11111211121314AIS RE. Response to Conditions & Mitigation Measures - Q The Colony Apartment Project (TTM # 15178) Dear Genia: Attached please find responses ;to conditions and EIR Mitigation Measures for the above - noted project. Each condition and mitigation measure is included with a separate response for each item. If you have any questions, please contact me at (714) 720-5565. Thank you for your cooperation andhelp in processing this project. Sincerely, Richard E. Lamprecht Vice President Development REL:skc 550 Newport Center Drive, Suite 300, Newport Beach, California 92660 • (714) 720-6500 • Fax (714) 720-5550 09/16/1996 11:33 17145865866 BENDER PAGE 81 DOUGLAS-BENDER AND ASSOCIAIES Consulting Civil Egsiineer, FAC9iwr,E CovER SIMET DATE: e -- /,6— -5'6 IQ13 NUMBER: TO: c5Le-Ni'4 AT: A44-51-V12Wr arraal FAX NUMBER: 6'� S� � 3 Z I - FROM: '&" Z&' 9-rrC—_ r4X NUMBER: (714) 586-5866 This transmittal consists of 1- total pages. EUBIrEcT., ��5 376-P 94 i4c"m2l'1061) ITEMS INCLtJD$D: 6SR& 682t r—&8- IKVIAI& <'fe 4C-4-OWJ IVT-- .ZA C. Ta PJe JI-H TC Fice' ('_XCQ17 S f C<7(l /zk�5_ DAOFFICdFAXCO VERJFRM Tel, (714) 586W86 Fox, (714) 586.5866 22936 Milt Creek Drive, Suite A • Loguno Hills, Coliformo 92653 09/16/1996 11:33 17145865866 IFNJ79V PAGE 02 i96 tns. vans udreia Associate Planner City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, Ca. 92663 Subject: Utilization of SJHTC Fee Credits for Irvine Apartment Communities This letter is to formally request that Irvine Apartment Communities be allowed to utilize San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor fee credits in the amount of $346,920 for 245 units to be built on Tract 15178.In the City of Newport Beach. Based on executed Son Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee Credit and Reimbursement Agreements between the Transportation Corridor Agency (TCA) and The Irvine Company, the TCA has granted The Irvine Company $17,376,219 in available fee credits in exchange for dedication of Company land to the TCA for construction of the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor. After application to the , fee credits requested per this letter, a total of $12,221,266 in fee credits will remain as summarized below. Credit AgL=en Totgl Credits Credits Utilized Qatance SJHTC Segment 2 $ 5.215,984 $1.066,993 $ 4,148,991 (Laguna -Laurel) MacArthur/University Ave. 385.950 384,629 1,327 ROW -Newport Coast Drive 9.600,806 3.703,331 5,897,477 (as amended) ROW -Ford Road 600,128 .0- 600,128 Habitat Area 1.573.343 -0- 1573,343 TOTAL $17 19 $ 5.154.953 $12 2. 21.2se Attached are 1 original and 1 copy of an executed agreement for transfer of Interest in fee credits. Should you have any questions, please call me at 720-2558 or Kathy Besnard, Manager, Administrative Services for the Transportation Corridor Agency at 436-9800. Sincerely, CWCUUQ C thia Daily Land Oevelopment Finance cc: Kathy Sesnard, Transportation Corridor Agency Irvine Apartment Communities 550 Newport Centcr brive. P.O. Box e370, Newport Beach, Catitornia 92650-637D • (714) 720-2000 11233 17145865866 875 5AN CLEMENTE'DR Permit No : G9600089 status : PENDING BENDER *** Permit Demo *** This type ; Grading Permit Parcel number : Group-OCCuP/use: owner Applicant Applicant Addr Job Address Phone number Class Code valuation IRVINE CO SENDER DOUGLAS & ASSOC 22936 MILLCREEK DR, IAA 875 SAN CLEMENTE DR : 714/586-0086 67,860 Construction Permit to do PRECISE GRADING ENGINEER BENDER DOUGLAS WILLIAM .rrrrrrrrwwwwwww*rrr**r*'HOLD ON Special Conditions > PERMIT LETTER Fee description ---------------------------------------- Precise Grading Permit (Y) cu. yardage FILL ----> cu. yardage CUT ----> $ Valuation of iPLAN mprovements*--(Y) GRADING _ ** PERMITHFEE *** (Y) GRADING wt+*wwr PLANNING:Z014ING PLAN CHECK FEE ?(Y) CLEAN-UP DEPOSIT > SJN TRANS. CORRIDOR FEE > MICROFILMING FEE > TOTAL GRADING/DRAINAGE PERMIT FEES Project Validated Inspecto Applied Approved completed TO Expire PAGE 03 Page 1 of 2 09/12/96 10:45 No 96000140 by EF r area: 7 o4/17/96 Lie. E C-028946 FINAL OF GRADING FOR ARCHEO/PALEO Units Fee/Unit Eat fee Data -------------------------------Y--- 21000 1600 67860 1623.75 X 3247.50 Y 172.12 Y 5000.00 346966.10 346866.10 64,95 356974.42 rwr rr* Fees: Required s Collected & Credits rwr •rr Nee ____ _ ____ ___ _ ___ __ ----- W Y -- .- W W -- --W w -4.�IW - 09/16/1996 11:33 17145865666 BENDER ruoLll-WUtC1 - 1Y145bbbdbb PAGE 04 N0.177 003 875,SAN CLENENTE DR Permit No : G46(100S9 *** Fees Required *** ------------------------ r Fees: 356,974.42 Adjustments: .00 Total Fees: 356,974.42 *** Permit Demo *** Page 2 of 2 00/12/96 10165 Project No : 96000140 *** Fees collected 4 credits *** Total credits: Total Payments: Balance Due: L.e-5s STH 7RWJ3 CORR/ 06A F615 cAg491 T A;, Cm T#6 X V11,16 60, T07-Al- .00 2,700.00 354,274.42 <3q-6, �G6.r0 4r7,0.,',.2. X THE COLONY APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures Applicable? Mitigation Measure Yes I No I Response Acsthetics/fieht and Glare In conjunction with site plan review, the project proponent shall prepare a detailed temporary grading and land- scape plan for the bluff top setback =rca for the purpose of minimizing bluff erosion. If graded slopes from a development area extend into the bluff top setback area, as proposed by the PC Text, the project proponent shall prepare detailed final grading and landscape plans for the bluff top setback area. The plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department, Planning Department, Public Works Department, and Building Department. Transnortat inn /f5rcvtation The City shall prepare a circulation improvement ../monitoring program to direct expenditures of funds received under the Development Agreement to make improvements and to monitor the status of those improvements. The list of im- provements to be implemented shall initially be based on those idcnliGed on Table V, with prioritiutfon established based on technical need and ability to implement them in a timely man- ner. Flexibility to add or delete projects on the list should be maintained to respond to actual changes in trafficvolumes and the ability of the City to accomplish improvements so long as the projected Net Benefit to the circulation system is main- tained. Thereafter, a review of The improvements' priority and implementation status shall be done in conjunction with the City's annual Congestion Management Program and Growth Management Program analysis and the annual review of the Development Agreement. The applicant or successor in interest shall construct t bond for all frontage improvements identified in the Development Agreement and listed in Table B of the Program BIR V ✓ No bluff top setback areas on The Colony (Block 800) site. Mitigation measure not related to specific project development. Item in progress; Bonds being prepared for Final Map. THE COT ,NY APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures Applicable? Mitigation Measure Yes No Response Air Oualil All grading related to the project shall be conducted accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. This mitigation mea- sure shall be made a condition of all grading permits related to the project. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation Zlflons while construction activities are being conducted, ugitive dust emission shall be controlled using the following procedures: Graded sections of the project that will not be fur- ther disturbed orworked on for long periods of time (three months or more) shall be seeded and watered or covered with plastic sheeting to retard wind ero- sion. Graded sections of the project which are undergoing further disturbance or construction activities shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. I These mitigation measures shall be made a condition of all grading permits related to the project. During grading and construction activities, the appli- shall further control fugitive dust emissions using the following measures: On -site vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to IS miles per hour. Entrances to all on - site roads shall be posted with a sign indicating the maximum speed limits on all unpaved roads. All areas with vehicle traffic shall be periodically watered. Streets adjacent to the project site shall be swept as needed to remove silt which may have accumulated from construction activities so as to prevent accumu- lations of excessive amounts of dust. Item completed. Included in the Special Grading Notes section on the Title Sheet of the submitted Rough Grading Plan. Item completed. Included in the Special Grading Notes section on the Title Sheet of the submitted Rough Grading Plan. These mitigation measures shall be made a condition of all Item completed. Included in the Special Grading Notes section TEE COLONY APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures A IicableT Mitigation Measure Yes I No Response Office and commercial development on the Corpo- rate Plan West and Bay View Landing site shall also partici- pate in the Centerride program currently in operation in the Newport Center area. Evidence of intent to participate shall be provided to the City of Newport Beach Building Depart- mcnt prior to issuance of occupancy permit. Bicycle racks shall be required in accordance with (lacity of Newport Beach Transportation Demand Ordinance. Construction of related frontage improvements shall include bus turnouts and shelters if determined to be necessary and desirable by the Orange County Transit District and/or the City of Newport (leach. Prior to final design and construc- tion of any frontage improvements, the City of Newport (leach shall contact the Orange County Transit District to determine if any bus turnouts or shelters will be required. 10. All development shall include street and security rg ling (in parking lots and pedestrian walkway areas) which is energy conserving. A' lighting plan shall be submitted for all development which demonstrates compliance with this me -sure. The plan shall be reviewed by the Planning Department and approved by the Department of Public Works. 11. Residential, commercial and office development shall e landscaped with an emphasis on drought resistant plant species which will shade buildings and reduce water and energy consumption during the summer. 'A landscape plan shall be submitted for all development which demonstrates compliance with this measure. The plan shall be reviewed by the Planning Department and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. VItem relates only to corporate Plaza West and Bay View Landing, Bicycle racks to be included where appropriate. Not applicable - No bus turnouts on required l/ r2 V'� f P� t, s; J temVn process. Energy efficient lag ling sped re m }fie lighting plan to be submitted to Building and Public Works Dept. For approval. Landscape plan to be submitted for review. Not required prior to 1/ grading permit. THE COLONY APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures Applicable? Mitigation Measure Yes I No I Response Noise 0dweline applicant shall ensure that all residential lots llings are sound attenuated against present and pro- jected noise, which shall be the sum of all noise impacting the project, so as not to exceed an exterior standard of 65 dB CNEL in outdoor living areas and an interior standard of 45 dB CNEL in all habitable rooms. Evidence shall be prepared under the supervision of a City certified acoustical consultant which demonstrates that these standards will be satisfied -in a manner consistent with applicable zoning regulations and sub- millcd as follows: A. Prior to the recordation of a final tact/parcel map or prior to the issuance of Grading Permits, at the sole discretion of the City, an Acoustical Analysis Report shall be submitted to the Chys Advance Planning Manager for approval. The report shall • describe in detail the exterior noise environment and preliminary mitigation measures. Acoustical design features to achieve interior noise standards may be included In the report in which case it may also satisfy'II' below. D. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, an acoustical analysis report describing the acoustical design features of the structures required to satisfy the exterior and interior noise standards shall be submitted to the Advance Planning Manager for approval along with satisfactory evidence which indicates that the sound attenuation measures speci. fied in the approved acoustical report(s) have been incorporated Into the design of the project. C Prior to the issuance of any building permits, all freestanding acoustical barriers must be shown on the projects plot plan illustrating height, location and construction in a manner meeting the approval of the Crty's Advance Planning Manager. D. Prior to the issuance of any Certificates of Use and Occupancy, field testing in accordance with Lille 25 regulations may be required by the Planning Direc- tor to verify compliance with SCC and IIC design / standards. V / Item completed. Noise study submitted and approved by Pinnning Dept. Item completed. No exterior noise mitigation required. Details for interior sound attenuation measures included in the approved sound report to be included in building plans. ✓ Not annlicablc. No freestanding acoustical barriers. Item cannot be completed at this time. Required after construction or units. THE COLONY APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures Applicable? Mitigation Measure I Yes I No I Response Z'inst All non-residential structures shall be sound attenu. the combined impact of all present and projected noise from exterior noise sources to meet the interior noise criteria as specified in the Noise FJement. Prior to the issuance of any building pcmtits, evidence shall be prepared under the supervision of a City certified acoustical consultant that these standards will be satisfied and shall be submitted to the Manager, Advance Planning in the form of an Acoustical Analysis Report describing in detail the exterior noise environment and the acoustical design features required to achieve the interior noise standard and which indicate that the sound attenuation measures specified have been -incorpo- rated into the design of the project. 14. All freestanding acoustical barriers shall be a berm, wall or combination berm and wall. Walls shall not contain holes or gaps. Walls shall be constructed of slumpstone or other masonry material. Final acoustical barrier heights and locations shall be determined when final grading plans arc developed showing lot locations, house/building setbacks and precise pad elevation. 79. At the time specific site plans and grading plans are Prepared and submitted for review and approval by the City, the City shall review the plans in conjunction with the enviro, mental review process to confirm that the mitigation measures provided will adequately control construction impacts potential- ly impacting the Newport Harbor Lutheran Church, especially its pre-school operations. If necessary, additional conditions related to construction activities may be placed on the project. Not applicable. No non-residential structures requiring sound attenuation. Not applicable. No freestanding acoustical barriers. Not applicable. Item relates to development on Upper Castaways. THE COLONY APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures A licable? Mitigation Measure Yes No Response wot Resourors Pursuant to Section 1601-1603 of the State of Cali. is Fish and Game Code, the California Department of Fish and Game shall be notified of any alterations to streambed habitats. The applicant or any successors in interest shall be responsible for notifying the Department of Fish and Game regarding any grading related to residential development and associated improvements on the San Diego Creek South, Up- per Castaways, Newporter North, and Freeway Reservation sites which would alter streambed habitats. The applicant or any successor in interest shall notify the Department of Fish and Game and obtain any necessary permit prior to the issu- ance of a grading permit. Copies of proper notification and necessary permits shall be provided to the City of Newport Beach prior to issuance of a grading permit. 'Ilse City of New- port Beach shall be responsible for notifying the Department of Fish and Game regarding any grading related to any public improvements (e.g. trails, recreational facilities, roads, drainage facilities, cic.) in areas designated for open space, public facili- tics, and/or parks which would alter streambed habitats. The City of Newport Beach shall notify the Department of Fish and Game and obtain any necessary permits prior to commercr- meat of any grading which could alter the streambed habitat. The permits issued by the Department of Fish and Game pur- suant to Sections 1601-1603 may require additional mitigation --L Not annlicabie. Development does not include alterations to streninbcd measures deemed necessary by the Department. habitat. Welland delineation studies in accordance and con- tion with the California Department of Fish and Game and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permitting processes shall be performed for any welland which will be impacted by grading and construction activities. The applicant or any successor in interest shall be responsible for conducting the -wetland delin- calion studies for wetlands impacted by residential develop - meat or associated improvements on the Newporter North and Upper Castaways sites. If residential development or associat. ed improvements on the San Diego Crrrk South or Freeway Reservation sites encroach into the Bonita Creek wetland, the applicant or any successor in interest shall be responsible for conductine the wetland delineation sludv. The Citvof New Beach shall be responsible for conducting the wetland delinea- tion studies for wetlands impacted by any public improvement- s/facilities in areas designated for open space, public facilities, and/or parks which will encroach into wetlands. The studies shall occur at the time specific site plans and grading plans arc Not applicable. No wetlands on The Colony (Block 800) site. avaiiabir and nrinr in iamecr nr �,.,, r_x_ .......:..... .,.» THE COLONY APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures A licable? Mitigation Measure Yes No Response I - Public use and related facility development for areas proposed for natural open space and passive park uses within the Upper Castaways, Newporter North, Newporter Knoll, Bay View Landing, precway Reservation, and Jamboree/MacArthur sites shall be designed to be sensitive to existing biological re- sources. To this end, facility plans and public uses for these areas shall be prepared in consultation with a qualified biolo- gist who shall determine that such plans and uses do not ad- versely impact sensitive resources identified on these situ (e.g. wetlands, coastal sage scrub, etr.). If necessary, additional environmental documentation shall be prepared at the time facility plans are prepared to determine if significant adverse impacts beyond those anticipated in this Program BIR will occur. If new significant adverse impacts arc identified, addi- tional mjtigalion measures shall be adopted. /}„a,// Grading, eanhmoving, and any related construction activities related to residential development and associated improvements on the Upper Castaways, San Diego Creek South, Day View landing, and Newporter North sites shall be restricted as follows. Upper Castaways and Newporler North - No grading (except that necessary for trail establishment and improvements, erosion control, bluff stabilization or prepara- tion of the development arc&), stockpiling of soil or operation of equipment shall lake place within the bluff top setback area established by the Bluff Top setback Ordinance. San Diego Creek South - No grading, stockpiling of soils, or operation of equipment shall encroach into the arcs of Bonita Creek beyond the existing 15 foot elevation contour. Newporier North - No grading, stockpiling of soils or operation of equipment shall take place within the 40 foot property line setback area cstab- lishcd by the Bluff Top Setback Ordinance except that neces- sary for trail establishment and improvements, erosion control, bluff stabilization, or preparation of the development area; or below the lessor of the 60 foot elevation contour or a line 100 feet from a formally delineated wetland in John Wayne Gulch freshwater marsh. Bay View -Landing - no grading, stockpiling of soil or operation of equipment shall encroach into the hill- side above the 25-foot contour of the lower development area. Not applicable. No public use and related facilities designated The Colony (Block 800) site. Not applicable. No special grading requirements related to The Colony (Block 800). THE COLONY APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures A licable? Mitigation Measure Yes No Response Prior to grading and/or constructing any public facility on the San Diego Creek North site which will encroach into the on -site freshwater marsh, the City of Newport Bcach (or other public agency responsible for development of the public facility) shall approve and begin implementation of a plan which shall offset the loss or wetlands. Ibis plan shall re- flect all mitigation requirements of any State or Federal agency having jurisdiction over the affected wetlands. Offsets shall be achieved by either creating a new freshwater marsh on -silo or enhancing and expanding an existing freshwater marsh in or near the San Diego Creek and Upper Newport Day Ecological Res/ervje Not annlicable. Item relates to San Diego CrcckNorth. 2 Prior to grading and/or constructing any residential /development or associated improvement on the Upper Cast- aways site which will encroach into the on -site freshwater marsh, the applicant or successor in interest shall prepare and begin implementation of a plan which shall offset the loss of wetlands. This plan shall reflect all mitigation requirements of any State or Federal agency having jurisdiction over the affect- ed wetlands. Offsets shall be achieved by either creating a new freshwater marsh on -site or enhancing and expanding an exist- ing freshwater marsh in or near the Upper Newport Bay Eco- logical Reserve. A copy of the plan and all related permits shall be presented to the City of Newport Beach prior to issu- anceeof a grading permit. Not applicable. Item relates to Upper Castaways. L2 }! Prior to grading and/or constructing any residential development or associated improvement on the Newporter North site which will encroach into the on -site freshwater marsh, the applicant or successor in interest shall prepare and begin implementation of it plan which shall offset the loss of wetlands. This plan shall reflect all mitiggaation requirements of any State or Federal agency having jurisdiclion over the affect- ed wetlands. Offsets shall be achieved by either creating a new freshwater marsh on -site or enhancing and expanding an exist- ing freshwater marsh in or near the Upper Newport Day Eco- logical Reserve. A copy or the plan and all related permits shall be presentedtothe City of Newport Beach prior to issu- ance of a grading permit. Not applicable. Item relates to NewportcrNorth. THE COLONY APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures A licable? Mitigation Measure Yes No Response Development on the San Diego Creek South site shall be duigncd so as to reduce the amount of light and glare which could potentially spill over into the wctland habitats of Bonita Creek and San Diego Creek and which could also im- pact the functioning of these creeks as wildlife corridors. This can be achieved by a variety of means including a combination of sensitive siting of lighted buildings; use of lighting systems which conceal the light source and minimize light spillage and glare; screening walls/berms; and dense landscaping along the edge of the development. Any landscaped edge screening shall include non-invasive trees and shrubs. The plant palette for the screening vegetation shall consist of dense, evergreen spe- cics which, when mixed, achieve canopy and understory of elements to provide as much screening as possible. The site plan and landscape plan for this edge shall be prepared in consultation with a City -approved, qualified biologist. The site plan and landscape plan shall be approved by the City Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits. Prior to commencing grading, all wetlands habitat in areas intended for preservation shall be temporarily fenced. This measure shall pertain only when grading, stock -piling, or other construction activities arc proposed within 100 feet of the boundaries of the wetland area. A plan identifying the wctland area and the location of the fencing shall be submitted to the City of Newport Beach prior to issuance of any grading permit. This measure shall apply to the Newporter North, Newporter Knoll, Day View Landing, upper Castaways, San Diego Creek South and San Diego Creek North situ. Rcve- gelalion of cut and fill slopes, bluff stabilizalion/remediation areas, fuel modification zones and other graded areas adjacent to existing sensitive habitat areas (e.g. at the edge of develop- ment of residential, public facilities, or recreational areas) shall be accomplished with plant palettes containing predominantly native species. Steeper slopes (greater than 2:1) shall be rcve- gclatcd with a mixture of coastal -sage scrub species including California sage brush which now dominates coastal sage scrub used by California gnatcatchers. Portions of more level areas shall be revcgctated with species of native perennial grasses in an attempt to establish native grassland. An expert in land. scape rcvcgetdtion, who is knowledgeable and qualified in na- tive plant mixtures shall provide consultation into the prepara- tion of landscape plans to ensure that this measure is complied with. Landscape plans shall be approved by the City Planning V Not a licable. Item relates to San Diego Creek South site. V Not applicable. No wetlands on The Colony (Block 800) site. Not anplicable. The Colony (Block 800) not included in list of Sites related to this measure. THE COLONY APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148- Mitigation Measures Applicable? Mitigation Measure Yes No Response All non -emergency grading related to bluff stabili- ralion/remcdialion on the Newporter North and Day View Landing sites shall occur during the non-brecding-scason for the California gnalcatcucr. The non -breeding season is from Not applicable. Item relates to NewporterNorth and Bay View AuggusttII to January 31. banding silts. ]x: Prior to approval of site plans or subdivision and/or !City approval of a park development plan (whichever comes first), the City shall retain a biologist to further assess the potential for human and pet intrusion into the coastal sage scrub habitat supporting the California gnatcatcher population. This assessment shall be at the cast of the developer if related to site plans or subdivision, or at the cost of the City if related to the park development plan. If the level of expected intru- sion is considered to be of sufficient magnitude to significantly impact the California gnatcatcher populations on site, mitiga- tion measures shall be designed and placed as conditions on the project to reduce the impact to the extent feasible. Such design and operational measures could include perimeter fenc- mg, homeowner and community educational programs about the potential impact of cats on wild birds, programs for trap- , / Not applicable. Item relates to park development plans only. ping and removing problem animals. —V/ The City of Newport Beach shall consult with the Transportation Corridor Agency prior to final design and ap. proval of any public facility or recreational facility on the San Diego Creek North site to determine feasible design and land. scaping measures which will avoid interfering with the viability of the San Diego Creek Northern Marsh Creation site as wild- life habitat. If the Bayview Way extension is not extended across the site, a landscaped buffer area will be provided be. tween any recreational or public facility uses and the Marsh Crcatio project site. Not nnnlienhic. Item relates to Sun Diego Creek North only. 8 At the time of adoption of a parcel/subdivision map for the San Diego Creek South Site, the property line/develop- mcnt area boundary shalt be. established at a minimum of 20 feet from the toe of the existing slope adjacent to Bonita Creek. This distance, in combination with the required build- ing setback of 5 feel, will create a minimum 25 foot buffer from Bonita Creek. Not applicable. Item relates to San Diego Creek South only. THE COLONY APARTMENTPROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures Applicable? Mitigation Measure I Yes I No Response Parth Resources Faulting and Seismicity Buildings four stories in height or higher shall be designed in accordance with requirements for seismic zone 4 as outlined in Chapter 23 of the Uniform Building Cafe and/or v':!t the benefit of a site specific seismic ground response spec- trum study which would be prepared by the project geoleehn- ical consultant and structural engineer to allow matching of building period with site period. The structural plans and/or ground response study shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building Department prior to issuance of a building permit. Buildings less than four stories in height shall be designed by a Structural Engineer in accordance with UDC Chapter 23 requirements for Seismic Zone 4. Non-cr.:ical structures shall be designed to withstand strong ground shaking that may accompany a maximum probable earthquake along the Newport -Inglewood Fault. Critical structures (Le, hospi- tals, fire/police facilities, schools, etc.) shall be designed to withstand strong ground shaking associated with a maximum credible earthquake on the Newport -Inglewood Fault. Simc- tural plans, including seismic design calculations/parameters, shall be approved by the City Building Department prior to z building permits. Habitable buildings shall not be placed adjacent to elow) slopes orbluffs where seismic induced slope or bluff failure could occur. Though the City has established a Bluff Setback Criteria for development on the top -of -bluff (Development Policy D.2.b.1 of the Newport Beach General Plan, January 21, 1991, and Newport Municipal Code section 20.151.080). the City minimum setbacks may not necessarily be adequate from a geotechnical viewpoint concerning bluff/slope ins,abilily during an earthquake. Areas potentially prone'to such failures shall be identified and further evaluated by the project Geotcchnical Consultant during the Tentative Tract Map review and Grading Plan review stage. The evaluation shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the Building Depart- ment prior to the issuance of grading permits. Grading and building plans shall reflect the recommendations of the evalu. ation to the satisfaction of the Building Department. Item Completed. Buildings designed as indicated. Refer to structural Plans and related calculations included in plans currently being plan checked by the Building Department. Item completed Buildings designed as indicated. Refer to structural plans and related calculations included in plans currently being plan checked by the Building Dept. Not applicable. No sucil conditions related to The Colony (Block 800) site. THE COLONY APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures A licable? _ Mitigation Measure Yes No Response In accordance with the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone Act, a Registered Geologist shall further evaluate and make recommendations regarding the potential for ground surface rupture effecting proposed development on -sites where 'Potentially Active Faulty have been Identified (Day View Landing and Freeway Reservation situ) or on any other of the situ where Potentially Active Faults are Identified in the fu- ture. The study shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Building Department and shall be prepared prior to ap- proval of a tentative tract map or grading permit whichever comes first. Grading and building plans shall reflect the me- ommcndations of the study to the satisfaction of the Building Department. Liquefaction K9/ Situ where the potential for liquefaction has been dentiGed, or any other site where the potential for liquefaction may be encountered during subsequent investigations, shall be further evaluated by a geotechnical consultant. The evaluation shall include subsurface investigation with standard penetration testing or other appropriate means of analysis for liquefaction potential. The project geotechnical consultant shall provide a statement concerning the potential for liquefaction and its possible impact on proposed development. If necessary, the geotechnical consultant shall provide mitigation measures which could include mechanical densification of liquefiable layers, dcwatcring, fill surcharging or other appropriate measures. The Geotechnical COnsullanCs report shall be signed by a Certified Engineering Geologist and a Registered Civil Engi. neer and shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the Building Department prior to issuance of Grading Permit. Grading and building plans shall reflect the recommendations of the study to the satisfaction of the Building Department. VTo be addressed in an addendum report by Law/Crandall. JVOO To be addressed in an addendum report by Law/Crandall. THE COLONY APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures Applicable? Mitigation Measure I Yes I No Response Hrosilon 31 Any necessary diversion devices, catchment devices, r velocity reducers shall be incorporated into the grading plan and approved by the City Grading Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Berms or other catchment devices shall be incorporated into the grading plans to divert sheet flow runoff away from areas which have been stripped of natural vegeta. lion. Velocity reducers shall be Incorporated into the design, espec11a11 here drainage devices exit to natural ground. /l All fill slopes shall be properly compacted during grading in conformance with the City Grading Code and veri. tied by the project Geolechnical Consultant. Slopes shall be planted with vegetation upon completion of grading. Confor- mance with this measure shall be verified by the City Grading Engineer prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. 3 . Berms and brow ditches shall be constructed to the satisfaction and approval of the City Grading Engineer. Water shall not be allowed to drain over any manufactured slope face. Top -of -slope soil berms shall be incorporated into grading plans to prevent surface runoff from draining ever future fill slopes. Brow ditches shall be incorporated into grading plans to divert surfidal runoff from ungraded natural areas around future cut slopes. The design of berms and brow ditches shall be approved by the City Grading Engineer prior to issuance of gra/ding P`rmits. 3 Priortothe issuance of grading permits, appropriate `/ artifi tal substances shall be recommended by the project land- scape architect and approved by the City Grading Engineer for use in reducing surface erosion until permanent landscaping is well established. Upon completion of grading, stripped areas shall be covered with artificial substances approved by the City Grading Engineer. Item comnleted. The identified items are incorporated on the -sum Erosion Control Plan included as part of the Rough Grading Plan (Sheet 2 of 2). Implementation of the proposed design would satisfy the condition. This item is a Standard Condition in the City Grading Code and is so Noted as an item under "Grading Fills/Cuts" on Sheet I of 2 of the Rough Grading Plan Item completed. The berm detail is shown on sections "A" through "C" on Sheet 2 of of the Rough Grading Plan. Item comoleted. The Rough Grading Plan calls for all manufactured slopes upon completion of grading to be landscaped in accordance with chapter 15 of the Newport Beach Municiple Code. See Note 12 of the "grading fills/cuts" Notes on sheet 1 of 2 of the Rough Grading Plan. THE COLONY APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures A Hcable? Mitigation Measure Yes No Response 3 . Drainage of both surface and subsurface water over or toward the bluffs on the Upper Castaways and Newporter North sites shall be minimized. Though some drainage of rainwater over the bluff face cannot be avoided, drainage con- trol devices shall be designed to direct excess water from site improvements away from the bluff face. irrigation shall be controlled to prevent excessive inftlttalion into the subsurface. The project Civil Engineer shall design grading plans to mini- mize surface runoff over the bluff faces. The project Geot- echnical Consultant shall provide recommendations to minimize subsurface water migration toward the bluff (aces prior to approval or Tentative Tract maps or site plans. All design criteria for t„, control of surftcial and subsurface water shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Grading Engineer. Muff an Instability The project gcotechnical consultant shall review the tentative tract map and grading plan for each site and prepare a report addressing all salient gcotechnical issues related to bluff and slope stability of any existing bluff or slopes. These reports shall include: 1) detailed analysis of field data including surface and subsurface geological mapping; 2) laboratory test- ing results; 3) stability analysis of existing bluffs and proposed slopes as illustrated on the tentative tract map or rough grad- ing plan; 4) conclusions; S) recommendations for mitigation of any identified unstable bluffs or slopes and/or for additional investigation. These reports shall be signed by a Ccrifficd Engineering Geologist and a Registered Civil Engineer and shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Grading Engi. near prior to issuance of a grading permit. �37 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Project gcotcchnwal consultant and/or civic engineer shall make written recommendations for manufactured slope stabilization includ- ing, but not limited to, buttressing, rock bolting, grouting, slope gradient laybacks, or retaining walls. All necessary recommen- dations shall be included in the grading plan to the satisfaction of the City Grading Engineer. Not applicable. Item relates to bluffs at Upper Castaways and Newporter North. No such bluffs at The Colony (Block 800) site. Not applicable, No existing sloPcs or bluffs to be retained on the site. Not applicable. No significant manufactured slopes related to The Colony (Block 800) development. THE COLONY APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures Applicable? Mitigation Measure Yes No Response -Iltough the City has established a Bluff Setback O Cntena for development on the top -of -bluff (Development Policy D.2.b.1 of the Newport Beach General Plan, January 21, 1991, and Newport Beach Municipal Code section 20.151.080), the City minimum setbacks may not necessarily be adequate from a geotechnical viewpoint concerning bluff/slope instabili- ty. Prior to issuance of grading permits, appropriate safe bluff top setback recommendations shall be determined by the pro- ject Geotechnical Consultant based on the evaluation required by Mitigation Measure 3 to the satisfaction of the City Grading Not applicable. No blu(Rop setback areas on the site. Engineer. 39 During grading a geotechnicat consultant shall mon- rtor grading operations to ensure that recommendations for slope instability mitigation are implemented. Additionally, the geotechnical consultant shall evaluate slopes as they are graded through geologic mapping and analysis to ensure that no unan- ticipalcd conditions are present. Slope stability mitigation recommendations may require modification during grading. Compliance with this measure shall be verified by the Building Open item. Must be completed during the grading operation Department. and verified at that time by the Bldg. Dept. 4 . Pnor to issuance of building permits, the geotcchn- rcal consultant shall prepare a Rough Grading Report and As - Graded Geotechnical Map for each graded site at the comple- tion of grading of that site. The Report shall summarize and document compliance with all mitigation measures. The Rough Grading Report shall include a statement regarding the ade- quacy of the manufactured slopes for their intended use and a statement regarding the adequacy of the recommended bluff setbacks. The report shall be signed by a Certified Engineering Geologist and a Registered Civil Engineer and shall be appro- Open item. Must be completed subsequent to grading operation. ved by the City Grading Engineer. Compliance checked at issuance of building permit. THE COLONY APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR # 148 Mitigation Measures Applicable? Mitigation Measure I Yes I No Response Compressible/Collapsible Soil Prior to the issuance or grading permits, written ommendations for the mitigation of compressibl%ollapsible soil potential for each she shall be provided by the geotechnical consultant. Foundation 'recommendations shall be included. Recommendations shall be incorporated as conditions of ap. proval for the site -specific tentative tract maps and grading plans to the satisfaction of the City Grading Engineer. Recom- mendations shall be based on surface and subsurface mapping, laboratory testing and analysis. Mitigation, if necessary, could include: removal and recompaction of Identified compmssi- ble%llapsible zones, fill surcharging and settlement monhor- ing, compaction grouting, or foundation design which utilizes deep piles, or other recommended measures. The geotechnical consultant's sitc-specific reports shall be signed by a Certified Engineering Geologist and Registered Civil Engineer, and shall be approved by the City Grading Engineer. 7o:rirm oi4 commmitigation ofpansive ansoil potential for each cite,:hail be pto-vided by thepct corrosion consultant, geotechnical consul- tant and/or Civil engineer. Toundation recommendations shall be Included. Recommendations shall be based on surface and subsurface mapping, laboratory '•sting and analysis and shall be incorporated into final building plans prior to issuance of building permits. The geotechnical consultant's site -specific reports shall be signed by a Certified Engineering Geologist and Registered City Engineer, and shall be approved by the City Grading Engineer. Item comRIeted. See Law/Crandall report dated 11/2/995 and letter of review of grading plans dated 3/18/96 for recommendations. Report not signed by a Certified Engineering Geologist (CEG), however reference will be made to the prior reports in the Law/Crandall addendum report (see response to Measures No. 29 and 30) which will be signed by a CEG, as well as a Registered Civil Engineer. Item completed. See Law/Crandall report dated 11/2/95 for recommendations, including the corrosion studies report by M.J. Schiff and Associates presented in the Appendix. Report not signed by a Certified Engineering Geologist (CEG), however reference will be made to the prior reports in the Law/Crandall addendum report (see response to Measures No. 29 and 30) which will be signed by a CEG, as well as a Registered Civil Engineer. THE COLONY APAR i.L,1 ANT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures Applicable? Mitigation Measure I Yes I No Near Surface Groundwater 43 The project gcotechnical consultant and/or civil engi- cer shall prepare written site -specific reviews of the tentative tract maps and grading plans addressing all salient gcotechnical issues, including groundwater. These reports shall provide findings, conclusions and recommendations regarding near -sur- face groundwater and the potential for artificially induced grou- ndwater as a result of future development, and the effects groundwater may have on existing or future bluffs, slopes and structures. The reports shall also address the potential for ground subsidence on the sites and properties adjacent to the sites if dewatering is recommended. The gcotechnical consul- tant and/or civil engineer's reports shall be signed by a Certi- fied Engineering Geologist and Registered Civil Engineer and shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Grading Engi- neer prior to issuance of a grading permit. All recommenda- tions of the reports shall be incorporated into the grading, site, and building design to the satisfaction of the City Grading Engineer and City Engineer. Water Resources Walter G ty Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the appli- cant.shall provide to the Building and Public Works Depart- ments haul route plans that include a description of haul routes, access points to the sites and watering and sweeping , program designed to minimize impacts of the haul operation. JL. These plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. Copies of the plans shall be submitted to the City's Planning Department. onse Item completed. See Law/Crandall report dated 11/2/995 and letter of review of grading plans dated 3/18/96 for recommendations. Report not signed by a Certified Engineering Geologist (CEG), however reference will be made to the prior reports in the Law/Crandall addendum report (see response to Measures No. 29 and 30) which will be signed by a CEG, as well as a Registered Civil Engineer. Item completed. The title sheet of the Rough Grading Plans contains a note That if import or export of material is necessary, a haul route will be submitted to and approved by the City Traffic Dept. Such plan would include measures to keep such route clean of dirt and debris. See note no. 10 of"Grading Notes" on Sheet 1 of 2 of the Rough Grading Plan. THE COLONY APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures A licable? Mitigation Measure Yes No Response 45 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the appli- cant shall incorporate the following erosion control methods into grading plans and operations to the satisfaction of the City Grading Engineer and Building Department. a. An approved material such as straw, wood chips, plastic or similar materi?% shall be used to stabilize graded areas prior to revegetation or construction. b. Air-bome and vehicle -borne sediment shall be con- lrolled during construction by. the regular sprinkling of exposed soils; and the moistening of vehicles loads. C. As approved material such as rip rap (a ground A) All graded slopes will be protected with a polymer binder for dust and erosion cover of large, loose, angular stones) shall be used control. See note one Sheet 2 of the Grading Plan. to stabilize any slopes with seepage problems to protect the top soils in areas of mnccnlmled runoff. B) Dust will be controlled by watering and procedures noted on the Grading Plan Sheets d. During the period of construction activity, existing I and 2. vegetation which will be retained on -silo shall be protected from traffic by the use of fences. If ap- propriate, buffer strips or vegetative filter strips, C) If any seepage occurs, recommendations by the geotechnical consultant in conjunction such as tall stands of grass, can be used as an alter- With the grading inspector will be used; and nalivo nd/or supplementary method to protect nst sediment buildup. D) Not applicable - no protected areas. 4 Prior to the issuance of gnding permits, the project eotechnical consultant and/or civil engineer shall develop a plan forthe diversion of stomtwater away from any exposed slopes during grading and construction activities. no plan shall include the use of temporary right-of-way diversions (i.e., berms or swales) located at disturbed areas or graded right-of- ways. The plan will be approved by the City Engineer and Building Departments and implemented during grading a nd Sheet 1, Erosion Control notes and Sheet construction activities. 2, Erosion Control measures. THE COLONY APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures Applicable? Mitigation Measure Yes No Response 4 71be applicant shall provide a temporary gravel en- trance located at every construction site entrance. Thc location of this entrance shall be incorporated into grading plans prior to the issuance of grading permits. To reduce or eliminate mud and sediment carried by vehicles or runoff onto public rights -of --way, the grant shall cover the entire width of the en- trance, and its length shall be no less than fifty feet. The en- item completed. A gravel blanket will be placed at temporary construction trance plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engi- access of San Clemente Drive as shown on Sheet 2 of of Rough Grading Plan. necr and Grading Engineer concurrent with review and approv- al of grading plans. 48. 'ntc applicant shall construct filter berms or other proved device for the temporary gravel entrance. The berms shall consist of a ridge of gravel placed across graded right-of- ways to decrease and filter runoff levels while permitting con- struction traffic to continue. The location of berms shall be incorporated into grading plans prior to the issuance of grading Item completed. The temporary gravel entry has been bermed which will direct permits. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City runoff to the desilting basin at Santa Barbara and San Clemente Drives. See Grading Engineer. Sheet 2 of 2 of the Rough Grading Plan. grading and construction, the applicant shall PDuring rovide temporary sediment basin located at the point of greatest runoff from any construction area. The location of this basin shall be incorporated into grading plans. It shalt consist of an embankment of compacted soils across a drain- age. The basin shall not be located in an area where its (.'lure would lead to a loss of life or the loss of service of public utili- ties or roads. The plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City A temporary desiltin b basin Grading Engineer. g will be constructed. See Sheet 2 of 2 of the Rough Grading Plan. g 74. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant or successor in interest shall prepare a plan for approval by the City of Newport 13cach Grading Engineer for the control of accidental spills, litter, and solid waste disposal during grading and construction. Existing policies and standards of the City of Newport Beach and Fire Department shall be incorporated. V The plan shall be implemented as necessary during grading and Per grading note 14 on Sheet I of 2 of the Rough Grading Plan, the applicant g $ construction activities. Agrees to remove deleterious material from the site. THE COLONY APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures A licable? Mitigation Measure Yes No Response 77. Brochures (such as the'Nonpoint source Pollution' brochures published by the Orange County blood Control District) shall be distributed at the time of initial sale or lease of residential and commercial properties. These brochures shall include a discussion of - Impacts of improper solid waste practices and littering. - Proper use and management of fertilizers, herbicides and other i -cut chemicals. - Impacts of dumping oil, antifreeze, pesti- cides, paints, solvents, eta into storm drains. - Effective housekeeping practices such as use of bio-degradable cleaning compounds and adsorbents. - Benefits of preventing excessive erosion and sedimentation. - Benefits of proper landscaping practices - Benefits of minimizing non-stormwater runoff or adverse impacts of over -irriga- tion. These brochures shall be reviewed and approved by the City of / Newport Beach prior to issuance of occupancy permits. V Drainage Patterns so. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the master plans of water, sewer and storm drain facilities shall be ap- proved by the City Engineer. Any systems shown to be re- quircd by the review shall be the responsibility of the develop- er, unless otherwise provided for through an agreement with the property owner or serving Agency. Open item. The "move -in" package, including the brochures specified in this item, will be submitted for review and approval by The City of Newport Beach significantly in advance of first occupancy. Item completed. A master plan of water, sewer and storm drain facilities has been submitted, reviewed and approved by the City of Newport Beach. Final construction plans for sewer, water and storm drain are currently in the advanced stages of plan check. THE COLONY APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures A pjjcable? Mitigation Measure Yes No Response Cultural Resources Archaeology ALL PROJECT SITES 51. All sites shall be mitigated pursuant to Council Poli- ty K-5. Where further testing or salvage is required, the appli- cant shall select a City -approved qualified archaeologist to excavate a sample of the site. All testing and salvage shall be conducted prior to issuance of grading permits or use of an area for recreational purposes. A written report summarizing the findings of the testing and data recovery program shall be Item completed Macko Inc. Has completed stud of the site and submitted to the Planning Department within 90 days of the -� P Y Submitted to the City of Newport Beach. completed data recovery program. 52. The applicant shall donate all archaeological materi- al, historic, or prehistoric, recovered during the project, to a local institution which has the proper facilities for curation, dis- play and study by qualified scholars. All material shall be transferred to the approved facility after laboratory analysis and a report have been completed. The appropriate local / institution shall be approved by the Planning Department V Item in process. Macko Inc. Representatives will be on site during grading. based on a recommendation from the qualified archaeologist. P 53. Any excavation of a site located within the Coastal zone of more than two surface meters of dirt shall require a coastal development permit prior to commencing the excava- tion. All provisions of the California Coastal Commission Not applicable. Site not included in coastal zone. guidelines shall be complied with. UPPER CASTAWAYS 54. Prior to any grading related to development of the bluff trail system, open space uses or bluff stabilization which could impact CA-0ra49 and CA-Ora-186 on the Upper Cast- aways site, the sites shall be subjected to test excavations by a City approved archaeologist (experienced in both historic and pre -historic archaeology) to determine site integrity, extent and significance. The methodology of the test excavation shall rc- flcct the recommendations contained in the CulturalResources report prepared for this Program EIR. A report shall be pro. pared detailing all findings and recommendations and submit- ted to the Planning Department within 90 days of completing test excavations. Not applicable. Item relates to the Upper Castaways development only. THE COLONY APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures A plicabie? Mitigation Measure Yes No Response BAY VIEW LANDING 55. Prior toissuanceof a grading permit, CA-0ra-1098 shall be surface collected and subjected to tut excavations by a City approved archaeologist to determine site integrity, extent and significance. A report shall be prepared detailing all find- ings and submitted to the Planning Department within 90 days of completing tut excavations. Not applicable. Item relates to the Bay View Landing development only. 56. Prior to grading for the new park, the project spon- sor shalt retain a City approved archaeologist to conduct a surface collection and subsurface test excavation of CA-Ora-66 to determine site extent, integrity and significance. A report shall be prepared detailing all findings and submitted to the Planning Department within 90 days of completing tut excava- tions. Not applicable. Item relates to the Bay View Landing development only. 57. Prior to grading for the viewVrIq the project spon- sor shall retain a My approved archaeologist to place a test unit on top of the knoll on the Day View Landing site in the area containing shell scatter, to determine if the shell is repre- sentative of a subsurface archaeological deposit. A report shall be prepared detailing all findings and submitted to the Plan- ning Department within 90 days of completing the test cxca- Not applicable. Item relates to the Bay Yew Landing development only. vation. NEWPORTL•R NORTII 58. Prior to the use or development of the open space areas for passive recreational uses, CA-0ra-51 and CA-0ra-5I8 on the Newporter North site shall be surface collected and sub. jested to test excavations to determine site extent and signif- icance. A report shall be prepared detailing all findings and submitted to the Planning Department within 90 days of com- / Not applicable. Item relates to the NewporlerNorth development only. pleting tat excavations. 59. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the appli- cant shall conduct a surface collection of the eastern extension or CA-0ra-100 which would be impacted by grading and/or development of residential uses. The surface collection shall be conducted,by a city approved archaeologist. A report shall be prepared detailing all findings of the surface collection and submitted to the Planning Department within 90 days of com- plcting the surface collection. Not apolicable. Item relates to the Newporter North development only. THE COLONY APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures Applicable? Mitigation Measure Yes I No I Response 60. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the appli- cant shall conduct a data recovery of program CA-Ora-64 on the Newporter North site. The program shall be conducted by a City approved archaeologist. A report shall be prepared detailing all findings and submitted to the Planning Depart- ment within 90 days of completing the data recovery program. 61. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for residential development or any bluff stabilization, a qualified archaeologist shall review grading and drainage plans to determine if there are any indirect or direct impacts to CA -Ora 51, 52 and 518. If impacts are identified, test excavatoas shall be conducted to determine site extent, integrity and significance. A report shall be prepared detailing all findings and submitted to the Plan- ning Department within 90 days of completing test excavations. NEWPORTER KNOLL 62. Prior to any grading or use of the site, the City shall conduct a surface collection of archaeological material present on the top of the hill of the Newporter Knoll, with tut units placed on the hill to determine site significance and bound- aries. One unit shall be placed in the recorded area of CA- Ora-50 to determine if a portion of the site still exists. A re- port shall be prepared detailing all findings and submitted to the planning Department within 90 days of completing surface collection test excavation. BLOCK 800 63. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a qualified City approved archaeologist shall conduct a surface collection of CA-Ora-136 on the Block 800 site and subject the site to test excavations to determine site extent and significance. A tut unit shall also be placed in the northern portions of the parcel to determine if a sub -surface midden is under the as- phalt and trash. A report shall be prepared detailing all tinys ings and submitted to the Planning Department within 90 days of completing test excavations. Not applicable. Item relates to the NewporterNorth development only. I/ Not applicable. Item relates to the Newportcr North development only. VNot applicable. Item relates to the Newporter Knoll development only. Item complete. Archeological surface collection complete and report submitted to City of Newport Beach. THE COLONY APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures A plicable? Mitigation Measure Yes No Response CORPORATE PLAZA WFSf 64. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a City ap- proved qualified archaeologist shall dig post holes in the areas containing surface shell on the Corporate Plaza West site to determine if the shell represents sub -surface archaeological deposits. A report shall be prepared detailing all findings and submitted to the Planning Department within 90 days of com- Not applicable. Item relates to the Corporate Plaza West development only. pleting subsurface testing. 65. Prior to the issuance of grading permit, the surface near the southern section of the property shall be examined by a City approved qualified archaeologist after removal of brush and prior to any ground disturbance. A report shall be pre- pared detailing all findings and submitted to the Planning De- Not applicable. Item relates to the Corporate Plaza West develo ment onl partment within 90 days of completing the surface examination. p y. FREEWAY RESERVATION 66. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for the north- ern development area (Lot 2). a City approved qualified ar- chaeologist shall examine the surface of areas previously idcnii- tiied as CA-Ora-216. 1he examination shall be conducted after removal of brush but prior to grading. A report shall be. pre- pared detailing all findings and submitted to the Planning De- parlmcnt.within 90 days of completing the surface examination. Not apnlicable. Item relates to the Freeway Reservation development only. Paleontology 67. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a collection plan shall be prepared and implemented by a City approved, qualified paleontological monitor for known exposed fossil localities on Bay View Landing, Newporter North, and Upper Castaways. Because of the small nature of some fossils present in these rock units, matrix samplesshallbe mllected for pro- ccssing through fine mesh screens. The collection plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. 68. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the appli- cant shall make provisions for the preparation and cuation of all fossils possibly recovered from the sites during grading. This shall be done in a manner approved by the City's Planning Department. Not applicable. Item relates to the Bay View Landing, Newporter North and Upper Castaways developments only. item complete. Macko Inc. To be on site during grading operations THE COLONY APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR 9148 Mitigation Measures Applicable? ' Mitigation Measure Yes I No I Response 69. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the appli- cant shall identify a repository approved by the City's Planning Department which shall receive all fossits collected from the sites. 70. Cliff faces along Upper Newport Day that have served as a reference section for micro -paleontological studies should be protected from attention. If bluffs along Newport Day need to be altered for bluff stabilization purposes, detailed measured sections and samples shall be made before and after alteration. Samples shall be prepared and analyzed as part of these efforts. The City of Newport Beach shall be responsible for retaining a qualified paleontologist to conduct the compara- tive study and sampling. A report shall be submitted to the Planning Department within 90 days. Public Services and Utilities Law lWoreemcnt 71. The project proponent shall wort: in conjunction with the City of Newport Beach Police Department to ensure that crime prevention features are included in building design and construction. The City of Newport Beach Police Department shall review all site plans and access plans. Water 72. Prior to issuance of grading permits for the develop- mcnt sites, the applicant shall be responsible for preparation of a Master Plan of Utilities. The Master Plan of Utilities will determine any necessary expansion of facilities and/or any modifications, upgrades or extensions to the existing water systems resulting from this project. All necessary expansions of facilities and/or upgrades or extensions of existing water sys- tems needed as a result of the project will be the responsibility of the developer, unless current district or City policies dictate olhetwise. The plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Itemin nro��s Not applicable. Item relates to developments adjacent to cliff faces on Upper Newport Bay. Itemcompleted. City of Newport Beach Police Depkreviewed and approved the Tentative Map and Site Plan Review submittals. Item completed. A master plan of water, sewer and stone drain facilities has been submitted, reviewed and approved by the City of Newport Beach. Fiinalconstruction plans for sewer, water and storm drain are currently in the advanced stages of plan check. THE COLONY APARIMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures Applicable? Mitigation Measure Yes I No I Response Wastewater 73. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the developer will provide a Master Plan of Utilities facilities for the on -site development in order to determine the exact necessary modirt- cations or extensions to the existing sewer systems, if needed. All necessary expansions of facilities and/or upgrades orexten- %ions of existing water systems needed as a result of the project will be the responsibility of the developer, unless current dis- trict or City policies dictate otherwise. The Plan shall be «- viewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. land Use 80. Prior to approval of a site plan review for the Upper Castaways site, the applicant or successor in interest shall pro- vide evidence that they have consulted with the Newport Ilar- her Lutheran Church regarding the design of the residential development. Design issues to be addressed include, but are not limited to: parking, access, location and placement of struc- tures, directional signage, and landscaping. Item completed. A master plan ofwater, sewer and storm drain facilities has been submitted, reviewed and approved by the City of Newport Beach. Final construction plans for sewer, water and storm drain are currently in the advanced stages of plan check. VNot applicable. Item relates to the Upper Castaways development only. THE COLONY APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures A 11Cable? Mitigation Measure Yes No Response 75. Any recorded CC&Rs shall incorporate mandates to the Homcownces Associations, commercial properties manage- ment and apartment management companies regarding. - Fertilizer/Pesticide/Herbicide manage- ment practices - Irrigation Management Practices - Street sweeping requirementr vacuum truck, fall cleaning, etc. - Signage and catch basin stcncil maintc- nancc. - Annual distribution of informational bro- chutes (see Mitigation Measures #77). These mandates shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Newport Beach prior to issuance of occupancy permits. 76. The City of Newport Beach, homeowners associa• lions, and commercial and apartment property management companies shall maintain legible stenciling on any catch basin that they maintain. Stenciling shall use selected letters and/or symbols approved by the City of Newport Beach notifying the reader that the catch basin drains to the Newport Day and to warn against dumping. Not applicable. As The Colony (Block 800) project is currently planned to remain renta no CC&R's have been prepared. If the units are sold as condominiums, CC&R's would prepared at that time and be reviewed and approved by The City of Newport Beach. Item completed. "No dumping at catch basin" stencil note to be included on final storm drain improvement plan. Applicant agrees on an ongoing basis to maintain such notice. THE COLONY APAR1NvihNT PROJECT Compliance with Final EIR #148 Mitigation Measures Applicable? Mitigation Measure Yes I No Response 83. The precise details of any revegetation / replacement program will be developed in conjunction with review and approval of design and grading plans when the exact nature and extent of impacts are known. Any such programs will be subjected to full environmental review pursuant to CEQA. Consultation with all interested and affected resource agencies will occur as pan of formulating and evaluating =vegetation programs. Given recent successful revegetation programs in Orange County, such as those conducted in Crystal Cove Stale Park, it is fully reasonable to expect that a properly prepared revegetation program will be successful in mitigating impacts. Not applicable. No revegetation/replacement program required for The Colony (Block 800) site. 84. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the Newporter North site, the project proponent shall contribute up to S10,000 to complete an Upper Newport Day Coyote Mo- nitoring Study, to be conducted under the direction of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The study shall be completed prior to the commencement of grading. The study shall include gathering data to establish a pre -construction baseline measure- ment of the number and frequency of coyotes using the lower / portion of Upper Newport Day in the vicinity of the Newponer North site. VVV . / Not applicable Item relates to Newponer North only. If, after commencement of construction, it is demonstrated by the U.S. I•ish and Wildlife Service that there has been a signifi- cant decrease in the population of coyotes in the vicinity of the Newporter North Site, due solely to development of the site, and, this decrease in coyote population has had a detrimental effect on sensitive bird species in the area, the project propo- ncnt shall contribute up to 525,000 toward an animal manage- ment program to be administered by the Resource Agency managing the Upper Newport Day Ecological Reserve. Not applicable Item relates to NewpoderNorth only. TheColon- Fashion Island: Finish Schedule Finish Finish Finish Finish Final First Pedmefer Start Scratch ' Brown Perimeter Interior Frerichs Cabinets Color Deliver Courtyard Courtyard Inspection Management Number Sequence WmaDer Coe Coat Landscaping S nee Inspection Installed Coat Appliances Landscaping Hardsca a Cof0 Walk Turnover Of Units Bld 1-11: Exteriors and Perlmiter Id 1-B: Interiors and Turn vers Area 1 A123f97 VIM 'MN& t7id/97 - Area 1 Mal, i;f1 dtii797 Arzffi97 et1i79f' 1O/12132 1011=7 10 IM21 10/31197 15 Areal 412197 S/A w Stt1JBi A71di9'F Areas ,A23tD'f TlAA7 A733:57 9I819T 8711fli 101t2/2X 1WI3ro7 MJ(tXl&i 7013tro7 72 Areal ¢I717X B7Aa1X an1p97 4*ta7f Ard2 413R'D7 • N'�,stf` A715W �W17M - '9/2&87 401d7/92 10I13197 IW13/97 10131ro7 12 Area 5730197 £f25f97 - •• 7,wv Am* Aml tt>7tR7 7A11Yt7 Af19EYf 9/it747 929,5i' 1Wf9l97 10r20197 10m197 11I7197 16 awesomeness Areas SAW 731AT2' - ?21dfA7 $` 6 Areas '67ft92 ,AM6/7 d121 9taw iOW 10 OY 10127/97 11/3197 11H4ro7 14 ArcaB 619@X Area se 7 d 112197 11110ro7 1121ro7 12 Bld 1-A:Exterlorsand Perlmiter Oid 1-A:IMedomwdTu Area7 �g ZOW, X1 M7 , 'TrdOl9'7 air Am? #la4RT AhG19i 'W27JA7 397iE/97 dtJ(AAl6X itroro7 11110ro7 11117197 11/29197 14 Area Sr" nz7t94 6fNBX aa(f4F Areal #, j4�' �M�Y -$.�479T 1O171/9T 31 11/13/97 11/17/97 11/24/97 1215197 12 Area mom M07 A77AZ iO1dlA7 Areas 7X1i97• Ar7A19Y S26rA7 IO2dF17 1027197 11/17197 1124/97 IWI/97 12/12/97 12 Area 10 71319? Area 10 #029 7 10127197 11/17/97 12/1/97 12/a/97 IV19197 12 Bid 2-B: Exteriam and Perlmiter Bid24B: Interiors and TUML.1. Area 12 V14137 w5197 td5tgl, 3i1i211f9Y Area 1/ 7fiw l2a197'• ,, „. u129i9Y 1VW97 11/13/97 1214197 12/15/97 i222197 112/98 16 Areaf1 V747 Alwr d/2O1&7 11s2W97 Area 12 Mar MWN7 1022197 11111ro7 11113/97 1214197 1229/97 115/98 1116198 14 Area 15 ail.7197 8/1$97 4 +4' Z V1201t Area 12 �f(#ry'f ili1tW 7 11/14197 11/17/97 12/H/97 1/5198 1/12/96 123/98 12 Area /8 7 i rea 1l A 102aro7 11119197 11117197 12/Bro7 1/12ro8 1119198 1130193 10 r 3 Bid 2-A: Exteriors and Perimihr Bld 2-kintadersaWTu Area 17 AfMt WMI grow 111tow Area 16 vw liflo 7 1127197 1214197 IZTS97 1/19/98 MWIl 2/6198 12 Area 13 OMI dint( 7 lillo 7 Ana it wiWY 1t/121117 12r1/97 1214 7' 12/25/97 126/96 2rMS 2113/98 12 Area 14 Ar12+97 9/kX797 1w*? 11/14197 Am 17 i7igA7 1S3F,.. 11114197 1215/97 1Z/8/97 1=9197 212/98 2/9198 220198 12 Area 19 Aii5t97 #2Ats7 i1VNd7 11114M Arta if WMIA 1 1115W 11/1a/97 t7110197 IVW97 1229/97 2ro/98 VIEW 227198 12 Area1H W97 0(1 7 112=7 I Area Is 11110ro7 I 1120197 1 12/15/97 iW14/97 114198 2/16198 MM3 I SIMS 14 IiWsed 10207 Prepared By.Bil Aben Owya: Irvihe Apm4)vA-c(DWV14 *V&W,a ram, Tred No. 15178 & i i z e�aKta err give. d 41 iolq(o COMMISSIONERS to� Mo' Ap Ab; CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES A--*1 L 1()()[ ROLL CALL INDEX Department, and commended them for their yea/lZrrujiSSion with the City of Newport Beach. Posting of the A e� nda: Posting of the James Hewicker, Planning Director, stated that t Agenda Agenda was posted on Friday, March 31, 199,5; in front of City Hall. Request for Continuance: Director Hewicker stat that the applicant, Newport Harbor Nautical Permit No. 3551, Request for Cont. ion * Museum, has reques d that Item No. 3, Use property located on the s therly side of East Coast Highway between the Bay Bridge and iside Drive, be continued to the May 4, 1995, Planning meeting. /'onmade and voted on to continue Item No. 3, 1995, to the May Item No.3 =s * * * * *uilng Commission meeting. MOTION CARRIED. sent Tentative Ma p of Tract No 15178 (Public Hearint Request to approve a tentative map involving the subdivision of a single parcel of land into two numbered lots for 245 residential condominium units, one numbered -lot for clubhouse/recreational purposes, one numbered lot 'for guard house purposes and two lettered lots for private drive purposes on property located in the Block 800 Planned Community. LOCATION: Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 136/22-23 (Resubdivision No. 612), located at 875 San Clemente Drive, on the southwesterly comer of San Clemente Drive and Santa Barbara Drive, in the Block 800 Planned Community -2- Item No.l TTMI5187 Approved COMMISSIONERS MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CALL INDEX ZONE: P-C APPLICANT: Irvine Apartment Communities, L.P., Newport Beach OWNER: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach James Hewicker, Planning Director, pointed out that the subject map is a tentative map and not a vesting tentative map. He stated that the site plan that was distributed to the Planning Commission was to only inform the Planning Commission of the elevations of the proposed buildings inasmuch as the site plan is not included in the public hearing. Don Webb, Public Work Director, addressed the following conditions in Exhibit "A". He recommended that Condition No. 10, be amended to state "That the private drive serving the development and the museum driveway be designed to line up." The purpose for the amended condition would be that it would be less expensive and more beneficial if the museum driveway would be moved. Condition No. 14 be amended to state ."That Santa Maria shall be improved with curb, gutter, sidewalk street lighting and pavement." He explained that because Santa Maria is a private street and a private easement that an encroachment permit would not be required. Condition No. 15 be amended to state "That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review by the City Traffic Engineer for compliance with City standards and policies. " Condition No. 32 be amended to state "That any Edison transformers serving the site be located outside the sight distance planes as described in City Standard 110-L, unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department" The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and Mr. Rick Lambert, Vice President of Development for Irvine Apartment -3- COMMISSIONERS MINUTES Mo Ay Ab 060 W CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CALL e INDEX Communities, appeared before the Planning Commission. He concurred with the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A", as amended. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Brown, Mr. Lambert explained that the truck driveway off of Santa Barbara Drive would be used for garbage pickup and moving vans. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed at this time. tion * Motion was made to approve Tentative Map of Tract No. 15178 subject to es * * * * * the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A", as amended. MOTION sent * CARRIED. Findin s: 1. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City, all applicable general or specific plans, and the Planning Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision. 2. That the proposed subdivision presents no problems from a planning standpoint. 3. That the design of the subdivision improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. 4. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 19.08.020 of the Municipal Code and Section 66415 of the Subdivision Map Act. 5. That sidewalk constructed along the Santa Maria street frontage and construction of ramps for the handicapped will improve pedestrian safety. 6. That Final EIR No. 148, previously certified on August 24, 1992, was considered prior to approval of the project, was determined -4- . CO'MMISSIONERS MINUTES \i35NO,\ kn\ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH A.*.14 1001Z ROLL CALL e INDEX adequate to serve as a Program EIR for this project, and satisfies all requirements of CEQA. The Final EIR reflects the independent judgment of the City Council. 7. That the mitigation monitoring requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 will be met through required compliance with applicable codes, standards, mitigation measures, and conditions of approval adopted in connection with the project. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the project is contained in Final EIR No. 148. CONDITIONS: 1. That a final map shall be recorded. The final map shall be prepared so that the Bearings relate to the State Plane Coordinate System. The final map shall be prepared on the California coordinate system (NAD83) and that prior to recordation of the final map, the surveyor/engineer preparing the map shall submit to the County Surveyor adigital-graphic file of said map in a manner described in Section 7-9-330 and 7- 9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. 2. That prior to recordation of the final map, the surveyor/engineer preparing the map shall tie the boundary of the map into the Horizontal Control System established by the County Surveyor in a manner described in Sections 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. 3. Monuments (one inch iron pipe with tag) shall be set On Each Lot Corner unless otherwise approved by the Subdivision Engineer. Monuments shall be protected in place if installed prior to completion of construction project. 4. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. -5- , COMMISSIONERS MINUTES �991" F1O y6� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CALL INDEX 5. That a standard subdivision agreement and accompanying surety be provided in order to guarantee satisfactory completion of the public improvements if it is desired to record a tract map . or obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public improvements 6. That each of the proposed 4 story buildings shall have one sewer lateral serving the first floor and one sewer lateral serving the second, third and fourth floors, as approved by the Utilities Department. These two sewer laterals shall be connected within the building garages before connecting to the public sewer system, unless otherwise approved by the Utilities Department. That the townhouse units not located within the four-story structures, shall be sewered with separate lateral connections to the City sewer unless otherwise approved by the Utilities Department. 7. That each unit shall be served with individual water services. The townhouses located within the four-story structures may use water meter rooms in the parking garage, as approved by the Utilities Department. The townhouses not located in the four-story structures shall be metered separately with their meters located within the street right-of-way, unless otherwise approved by the Utilities Department. Easements shall be dedicated to the City for access to the water meter rooms within the parking garage. 8. That the design of the private streets and drives conform with the City's Private Street Policy (L-4), except as approved by the Public Works Department. The basic private street and drive width shall be a minimum of 32 feet. The location, width, configuration, and concept of the private street and drive systems shall be subject to further review and approval by the City Traffic Engineer. 9. That the intersection of the private drives and San Clemente Drive shall be designed to provide sight distance for a speed of 30 miles per hour. Slopes, landscape, walls and other -6- COMMISSIIO\NERS c`��921�99o\�H� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES ROLL CALL INDEX obstruction shall be considered in the sight distance requirements. Landscaping within the,sight line shall not exceed twenty-four inches in height. The sight distance requirement may be modified at non -critical locations, subject to approval of the'City Traffic Engineer. The slopes adjacent to Santa Maria and the private drive into the development shall be laid back to provide sight distance in accordance with the City Sight Distance Standard 110-L. 10. That the private drive serving the development and the museum driveway be designed to line up. 11. That the California Vehicle Code be enforced on the private streets and drives, and that the delineation acceptable to the Police Department and Public Works Department be provided along the sidelines of the private streets and drives. 12. That if it is desired to have a control gate at the entrance, a turnaround shall be provided prior to the gate. The design of the controlled entrance shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and the Fire Department. 13. That easements for public emergency and security ingress, egress and public utility purposes on all private streets be dedicated to the City and that all easements be shown on the tract map. 14. That Santa Maria shall be improved with curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting and pavement.. 15. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review by the City Traffic Engineer for compliance with City standards and policies. 16. That asphalt or concrete access roads shall be provided to all public utilities, vaults, manholes, and junction structure -7- COMMISSIONERS �4 2° CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES ROLL CALL INDEX locations, with widths to be approved by the Public Works Department. 17. That street, drainage and utility improvements be shown of standard improvement plans prepared by a .licensed civil engineer. 18. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared by the applicant and approved by the Public Works Department, along with a master plan of water, sewer and storm'drain facilities for the on -site improvements prior to recording of the tract map. Any modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain, water and sewer systems shown to be required by the study shall be the responsibility of the developer. 19. That the Water Capital Improvement fee shall be paid. 20. That prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department and the Planning Department that adequate sewer facilities will be available for the project. Such demonstration shall include verification from the Orange County Sanitation District and the City's Utilities Department. 21. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to issuance of any building permits. 22. That the Public Works Department plan check and inspection fee be paid. 23. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of equipment and materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and local requirements. A traffic control plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. There shall be no construction -8- • COMMISSIONERS MINUTES q\ o� � 9 ? q'9y 9i < F CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH A-414 IOOS ROIL CALL INDEX storage or delivery of materials within the Santa Barbara Drive right-of-way. 24. That overhead utilities serving the site be undergrounded to the nearest appropriate pole in accordance with Section 19.24.140 of the Municipal Code unless it is determined by the City Engineer that such undergrounding is unreasonable or impractical. 25. That a fire protection system acceptable to the Fire Department be installed by the developer and tested by the Fire Department prior to storage of any combustible materials or start of any structural framing. 26. That prior to the occupancy of any unit, a qualified acoustical engineer, retained by the City at the applicant's expense, shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that the noise level on the project does not exceed 65dB CNEL for outside living areas and the requirements of law for interior spaces. 27. That any rooftop or other mechanical equipment shall be sound attenuated in such a manner as to achieve a maximum sound level of 55 dBa at the property line. 28. That any mechanical equipment and emergency power generators shall be screened from view and noise associated with said installations shall be sound attenuated to acceptable levels in receptor areas. The latter shall be based upon the recommendations of a qualified acoustical engineer, and be approved by the Planning Department. 29. Interior noise levels in the proposed project shall not exceed 45 CNEL in any habitable space. 30. On -site water mains and fire hydrants locations shall be approved by the Fire and Public Works Departments. -9- , .COMMISSIONERS MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CALL INDEX 31. A qualified archaeologist or paleontologist shall evaluate the site prior to commencement of construction activities, and that all work on the site be done in accordance with the City's Council Policies K-5 and K-6. 32. That any Edison transformers serving the site be located outside the sight distance planes as described in City Standard 110-L, unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. 33. That all applicable mitigation measures imposed by Environmental Impact Report No. 148 and Conditions of Approval of Traffic Study No. 82 shall be fulfilled. 34. That this tentative tract map shall expire if the map has not been recorded within 3 years of the date of approval, unless an extension is granted by the Planning Commission. se Permit No. 3550 stem No.. Reque to permit the establishment of a martial arts studio and an UP3550 acting/dan studio including aerobic lessons which specialize in the Approved training and in ction of martial arts, acting, dancing, and aerobics on property located in e M-1-A District. LOCATION: Lot 1, 12, 50 and 51, Tract No. 3201, located at 3926-3 Campus Drive, on the southeasterly side of C s Drive, between Quail Street and Dove Street, acr from the John Wayne Airport. ZONE: M-1-A APPLICANTS: Favian Carrillo and Manny Clark, urbank OWNER: Campus Square, Burbank -10- Y U N a a El CLEMENTE -zSAN --- _ _ t ----------------------- F. --- F.....156.0 1 j f Lu 15610 1 !. (160) !. - .cc IL KEY 1 7 �w 11 • BORING LOCATION AND NUMBER 1 ! 1 ts7 SV ELEVATION OF BEDROCK SURFACE ,UM►TS ►- •4 vim\ Br�RRw,weav i t PARKINGBUILD 1 ! 1 1 Q 1 U) t _ r . 1 - i 1 •. REFERENCE 1 - Q Om\ -'......MASTER SITE PLAN (BLOCK 800, �-. I i - '_ '- =`n': • 11 EWPORT BEACH) (AS REVISED 12R2194) POOL BY OOUGLAS BENDERAND ASSOCIATES. SITE PLAN AS REVISED 2127/95 BY DOUGLAS --_�•._ ---� BENDER AND ASSOCIATES. F.F.E. = 168.0 \ Bea - $\! PARKING GARAGE PLAN (UNDATED) BY 10 ��1M\jS McLARAND, VASQUEZ & PARTNERS ! RESTROOM BUILDING 80 ------------- PLOT PLAN IRVINE APARTMENTS -PROPOSED APARTMENTS SCALE _W li LAW I CRANDALL, INC. 'A&\ FIGURE 2 I - �� SANTA MAR I A STREET -� i Twtxs c9rtn__—t-- — — — — — — � \ I■ 1421p ! 1 2g G� 4 \\ 141$ 1420 14'L2 )424 132(v IEl EEIJ y- 2400 \ 1318 1'> 0 I Z2� 2209- 2 3 aO IZlB Z 1322 132�} \ 2402 Z2060 �12 20 l222 12 4 112& \ 2302 2104- MOO l$ I IZO f 122 ! 12210104 _ 2242 - - \ STAIfZ5' Z102 ❑ , > E l69 0 Li II(o Il,il 7 /\ 2 DO \ \ ` ZZDB I 1428 4 � ,\ �\ � 300 — 2108 I� ►4►4 !IZ$ Z100 \ �,\ Zylo 2310 GGI EJ 112.14I to -t—I i ?.,\•� ,��'� ^ lv I li\ 1 \\%�\`\ \\ \ \ 3� 1114- Li i l HIM-, — _ - -- 2117- L77 4 1400 12-00 > - 0 l 'L 22�i O u- IZ 10 - r, I 1 l 1 O O2 ❑ :�?4 22 1342 i�, 2322 �4?-0 sT 1R5 - 14 Olv 1204 1202 ,/ 2222 2320 4 1408 13 0!� I I I D 4 i I OZ ❑ 15 2-1 Z2 2220 2 ►8 231t0 Z 120 221(jo \.gymx •—f- i • f 1 :: \ / I \ / \�\ �) may" ` / i f /`�' � i •, � \ f .J� V »• j' r r // ",'"�I / \ / \/ v ' / ' �` \ T/ / 1 1\\: �� /` r{ R \ / / 'C /'�• }. }� \/,'•/• /\+\% �� � r �• ' f '� �,; .t� \ r• ii r//,/'i/ r /�%%�/4, L'\,%/\ r %� \ \/ \ % —711 MUM ......Ilion rmunuuum Wpm _■anMEME MEMO so so I MUMS � e ii.I . , ■ � Im110■ r-� Ei —0 � - -- _■■ III II �� ���/ _�—' (�■ I� � �► I III ■ n I ■■- ■■i■ �m MEN on ME ���I ■■. MINT In I ` S7AI IzS srA1Rs IUIi� J � ; I 343! ' \ \ I 4 4307 4405 4'�5 �}403 34M 34-37 3335 3235 ' 4207 4205 42.03 3339 5537 3135 41 o7 4105 410 5 32�f1 37 32$� i7 37 h i 44 \ 1 � I I I \ BUILDI;;G DEPARTMENT \(/ \ CITY OF NEWK1:171z_ ^ u, CA \ I AUTHCPPRO AI OF THESE PI A:S frT, NCT •;; _.ir'SC, 0.". AUTMC9IZA?ICi[ iO C;Y .T^\ 1•:' EJiI: r••- - _ - IYPIIED ' \ TENT'AIT4 T6E ;9SN%f."c= a_A„H- TH;iAr''r RESPECTS pt CC: '.iANCE . ii' „fTy, p_r. _ ' "1AEl MSGt"' •'. . PLANS AND Y PE.4 : TFT_ Cain IS N1K 5G ..' `u AO:• T- ;IGNPECItJT TO • \ \ \ .ENTIAJ ANY PESY;TEE iV ."EYRE )dE 5: D..". ;:.G.,, .�:._: 0.40 TO TN^P:ZEU 5Y ?HESE rl aNS. EEPOS:- - ..1' `P \� TICN, IF NEOESSANY iO CUYPLY Wi?�i '- 'C vN , r i'G �,„;� per. \ OF THE CITY CF NEW�DRT SEACH. '�'• •. ``..i 6:!'OJCIES 1 \\ I AP"\ICANTS ACKN04L JCENENT ✓ 1 7- !,a !UCKA! UC WOPAS vs7c_ TPAFRC 3317 3z Cl - — 3217 al icy \\ \\ AN 3117 / A➢PPOY;� T4 G5� •�E -- BY; ✓ C� \ GATE: -_ 3q 21 \\ 332 \\ \\ 3 \ \ I I 32? � \ 3123 \ 3425 3325 \ I 34 27 l ' 3227 3127 `•, 3333 \ 3133 3331 3429� y 3231 3329 r. 31 a 1 312-9 . \ I J � SANTA BARB! RA RIVE i A- d T , i SANTA MARIA STREET - —_—_— -�— Li JE -IW:L.Jt23E[SXFfT_ I / ----► / I �4aq �400 \ 14 I� 1420 1 q22 142A 132(0 230 t''IS J32D 1322 I'b2�} 1�2(° i� ❑ 2402 220 23GYo \\j 12 6 1z2o 1222 IZ 1121v 2302 ZIo4 210� 11lg 1I20 1122 11?1 2202 , sTA1R5 I ❑ 2(02 FI Iq l(oE=44- > 4 P ❑ \,; ElZZ05 2400 21,00 I I� M O I i 1414 ` l 12$`. % El21 /\ \\ \\ \ z}l0 I - >C,\ 2310 i 1314 �>\ \ 2210 to 1114- UL yli�•, i ,. �:1 f.rk nX _ %; \ 1i I �I I 231Z, i Jim NK"1Z ,ice Ilk 1410 12�y, 2 22F1 1100 2 i 24 I 1 I to III 1404 i�o2 /r22 2420 t t��� ` STAIRS 1304 IZDZ i /\ 2222 2320 23i8 - V 14 OCv 1�O4 110�v 2 a 1408 13p(� 1104 �; ❑ 2122 2 212D 2211b i 23 �Ol ZIIg> I 221(v (IOE) i� O ••••••� ••11 ••'\ `—OIL— ---I �/ � � —...i. ■1. ■•.ter.■■■mr■rf rs■ ■-Owf■i NONE ,•••• � ,�_ I 1 .■.■ �/\/ ' ` t `11 '1 t/■■■./■•■•■/■■ `\/ \ /'�/'\''': /\Ix\"/ \ \ /\\rr Kx 1 1 '1 i / rLi \�I I \, ///j ,�/�%i/11222 ,i '�/j� \ i� / � / �- ,rii , � �� - ' %s'//.'4G%'.:/ {�.�///%%/mow, <% 1 1 ■ • It ■ • •• ! 4417 44ILI � - ; 1 4317 a31°i - 4217 1 4117 41111 442 I;L 4al i1; yTAlKS 42-21 1 I I� 4`1 l5 4423 437r3 G� 4115 ��• g223 i, 4123 4413— 44 z5 I I 4313 4325 , , 1 i 4411 ❑ 4311 44ol 43D1 4211� ' I 4101 440q I 430q 11 I I J I 42 061 4109 , s7A11zs 44D7 44D5 4403 4307 7 4205 4203 4107 4105 4103 3go3 3405 3303 34o7 3307 3 21c 3 3205 32.p7 10?2 3105 31D7 L 331 5 32l 5 31l 5 -M11 3413 331 I 3313 32l I 32I3 3111 3113 ■ II:II't 3�j35 34'�I 3q-37 3335 333� 33 37 3235 Ej 32 3237 3135 ri j \ / BUILDING D-1-71z iE4T CITY OF NE4s° U�- �� Fi �, CA \ \ I APPgOVAI OF THESE Ai ' ^ --- AUTN LIED CP.i ATI • •r� 2 Opt 0 _C WIT4. T5' :.' -�,.I ' .. Cq C:CCVSIi 2EACN TN;; AFrd�;'/ a -'i`-' CO RESPECT$ k! .: °.dNCE °:+ " ;,• 'ur vNeG n:4 -' FLAN$ A1:G VOUCiE$ fHE CiTr 0: kEM a-: • , -- _ •:I*=Ea. REOUIPE ANY PERYITEE TO . EVISE THE 5iCla{,,,. Rb"4T TO \ \ \ AIENT uTHOWED 5Y THESE PLAN$. ccp ;,;. q ;3r UE' TICN, IF NECES$AgY 7' : <" "t "� - :4240�' OYPLY WITH :"F ": ; Lila .Cr? FOJCIE$ THE CRY CF NEWPORT GEACN. t \ APPLICANT'S ACIWOWLE30EYENT _ p )EPARTYENT 33 1 1 PUSUC WORK$ - 3 317 321 q rgAFFic __ 3217 311q \ `AN 3117 \\ \ APPP TO L $UE \\ 8Y; OATS .�-� ir 32 2 I 3121 _ '1•� \\ \ I I t \ I 3423 3323 32? 3 \ 3123 � 3425 3225 \ 25 34 27 3327 ' 3333 32 3 3 34-31 3133 3331 3429 \ 1 • 3231 3329 3131 3 2-9 \ i' j i SANTA BARBARA RIVE } :A } r t i t ,S _ ♦ ;. • • < O. .I e ♦ a i • 1 i ` 1 Z t + t, 3 tt w. .,4 ♦ 4 ....Y. , a1.4.r �� ........-_ '' _ ..�..� L"li..S . �-� .r .. _t. ,.. 1 Y` -. -ti a = ._ - --'._._ ' - _' - ._ _ ..'�.. a� �� ..� - .♦ - -� _ -� v°r- �.-a ,w. c-s .�.....� ti. .. .-_ _ s.-- A,,.� � .♦- .-. _ < _ .. - ,a . . _ _ .- � � � � , /) ------------ SANTA MARIA STREET / I { L -------------- I . I 142�0 , 141$ 1420 I q22 1421 132Co ' I � � 240& \ \` ►''IS d320 1Z2� ❑ ❑ III 1z20 1222 j22�} 112(� '� 2402 ZIo4 \ I Z \�, 23oZ 22 D(� l l (g I I Zo 1122 ! 12 �Y ❑ ❑ Z102 II \ srai�s \, > 121(v I II. I 32 -x , 2300 / 2200�,%�� 1414 12S — Ziro ��,�y� v =�,y 2-4to ! l ,, O \ \ �I 2210 12.14 2 to I I 'S r: ' / r. I Li / � I 0111 >�' l - 1 vv % 1400020 1 I 1410 I 12-Do IZIo X / 2124 - 23 �� \ ,• •� I I \1 4 �. � 1 \' r t, I Ilto ❑ �\❑22 ZI 14 \ ,. I 1�, � Q, III I�OZ ;`y 2322. 2222 2-320 29-18 - �♦+ O�v IZo4 23 I a ''�` �' - � �� 14Da 1301y � I l 04 ❑ >' ❑ 2120 ; 231w "� 11 12Ob 11 D(o 211 & I ■ l - — 1`� 77 — — / 1 wF, I � I /\ %'�/\ / r--r � \�/„ ■ ■■ 1 I / \ �� ', ,/- ■ W ■ ♦. �' — VAIC'DM.. %F 9EF1 i �� , O / \, ' � / V 7/ \l = ■■ /•• I,\ ♦ �� � —.■n�nnnKn■nnn r■■.■■■■ ■n■ F'till 1-T Not I •,\, ./ h y �! r.,t Jc J �� , .jam, • ,:%; '?`-,��%'. y;� f;. ' \ % / f /\ \ / — � a` El 5102 �_-`" �� /I 11 \` /'\�/� '�� I -� ! o/%i ;.'g; ./ ��� y r/ �%/9 . �. ° °� � '-/ ' (/-7 ` it //. �/�/%�//;�'• �%' ;i •1 I•■-■--u■u■■■ 1 \ I ♦ %%%/ �i%„•rL, r, %;r/, i,,,,i;, .�•;h \ ,fir.' /'• %,i/ 11 �y ■ — - I \ / \; \ \ I I O O O \ CITY IL IING DOrARPd`NT VA A' TIOVAL OF THESE PLEAS f,, pC* : - c=•'�=:+ �' IMPLIED \ TENT hliH. ThE ;RO,4=6CEi.. • :j 7� . 1 ♦ I— — — ■ 17 ` AUi HC IZAiIp! T 'T^ _ \ O 3_FCi Th•iAird aA: !'.ci••.�giA.._ �i; �•-•••lr -.P^fi 1 ■; 117tAJh[->L SeR l PLANS_ POLICIES iNE t1TY O: NFMP •>' •-•. c: r. •:?W �S. 1 * � � — — — � �/�— � � 1 ■ \ \\♦ L ♦ \ I RESPE^IS L•I CO<> J�NCE t'. ?1 :rsG 4::J ,•.. _ -• \ , ■■ , \ _� ■ ■ \ \ MEob'PE ANY JESY:TEE TO ^EYI C.. ' •..• rE'. o Nb4i TO ■ ■■ ■ / _ - YENi :JTNOFdED 4YT °__^- . NECESSARY jc,;C�pll,:LN.l.,"PAOYE- 1 ■�■■■■■■■■■ 441/ /u (� �/ �� r \ OF TIOThEFCITY OF Ni GEACY.eN !G3 Lid FodejiS 1 l r��J APPLICANTS ACK OWIEJGEMENT 1-517 4-3 T7 L - LT 4217 SI1)lW. c}211 r 331� iNAF C t 4117 41 i°� 4421 1 ❑ ❑ 33l1 331 3317 _ 1 3403 3405 3407 32q 3215 321 \ 452-1 I % 33D3 330� 3307 31611 3115 3217 31 ±9 \\ �\ G w APPPw rG ISGE !, S -AIF 42-21 i 32D3 32p5 3207 3117 a.: OATS 'I � � 121 ❑ �� ❑ [_ 3103 3105 3 ID7 � r, \ \ ; --__ / � 15 4423 I-1 (—I ° 1 _ 1� 1 p no ii • ii : • / :■■ice ' ■� _ � : � - ■■ ' 6 ■4-307- , 4207 ' _ i I 1411 3413 ,— 3311 3313 3211 3213 3I l i 3113 ■ 1i�11•� � sTA1Rs ;- J 3335 � 34M 3q-37 3 5 3?l 3 3 37 3235 32139 3237 3135 3�3� 3+3i /(• � SARTA BARB,ARA RIVE � �-�-.. r�.r.;.' . � --... ..__.. .._ = -- - - _. .. - ._.. _ , �._ � w.�.__ .� ,.. _ .._ _ _. Q-- _� - .... ., .,...-.� ._, .. __ < r _ . ..-_.-...f'" ►-`- " _ _ - -- .. _ .� . .. _ ----�.,�i. T --,r—f . - � - - - .. .. .. .... .. . . . . . .... • ---.......... .- - _ _ — -- -- .. _. - - - . __ _ -- - - - .. _ �C�- � .. .. - - _ _ _. .. - - -- -- rS. • 1. - �r SANTA MAPIA STREET IR'ia•.ASFLSNF[7_ li • ■ \ I / \ 11 141� 142w � � I ?�.� � v 1318 2400 1+20 14'L2 14241 i)2(0 ❑ i" ❑ 22p 2-3p(o \\ 1218 It)20 13Z2 1324\, 2402 + 220(0 I Z O ill$ 1220 12 Z2 IZ 1� 2302 ! 4- 210& \ 1120 ! 122 ! I2 2202 \ SrA1lz5 ❑ 2102 i + III; i! /�i I -7 -r T-! 24ob �� 1 l2l(0 ❑ / ❑ 2400 7 v v '"22.08 � ZIoB no 2100 \ z110 \v 2�37 1 D I 11 I I '11 12.14- _ -�.. .y•,;'`ti �':�r;, is \,. k`Y' �i:�� -L_/•' \\ \ \ Zi �O 11 14 r V V\ \\ i I LI I l4h - l330 , / , 241Z ,1312 I �II I I �•�Y. ) .,v ' ,,� � I 2a12. Iz I {3Gb ❑ I 232A CI 1 2 - 2224 "I 1310 r 1100 C / 2124 f 1Z 101110 t - - \ 1b02 ,� 2322 2320 24} 18 - 1 � \ � 14OCv 1�O4 IZDZ ��� 2222 2315 14aa 13D(o 1104 I l02 ❑ \>\/ ❑ _ 21 ZZ Z�Zp 21115 a 22I� �' 11 I I (o OD '\ 1ON M ALA y XI ••••'L-♦•1 ,T �♦\\� --� � j—..f.f■.1■1 r.ff H■1f1H HHfi if lit — \ \ � I� r/ i r ��/�r r \ �I I / ,.,\ iit :� \ / ; . / y � I i--•\ i \ \�% \ i l. l . ' :<, •r. '',i�%y/%/%%�,i" . 4,� ". . / \ ,% / \ / \ \ / r\ / ea /o o• oc 'i P 1 \, � .� ✓�:% i//.�/ �/gyp%/"// %/, / 1 , \ , I \ , .\J' V1 / , _♦ j %ri r�/jib/j// /\ O UK SON I \\ ►--- ----_ —� — — O � o wcx.e,[-YcSEFi 0 • • •• \ 1 4417 4{'4lq � l � 4z17 4zt�► fl —� 1 4117 411�1 ❑ ❑ I 33�`I _ 4421 3403 3405 3407 3209 -_ 452-1 I 3303 3305 3307 310,1 STAIRS 42-21 ❑ ❑ C_, 32D3 3Z05 32.p7 41-21 3103 3105 3107 ��i lam, �y 4 4 15 �4 0 _ ' I '' t 44Z3 ❑ ❑ 330 � Q ►5 11, i 42i5 43z3 32D I 1 4115 ���p g223� 3101 ti 4123 s II Lam' ❑�>❑ I / \ 3311 4413 44 2� 3213 4315 i I �� 4325 ,Lr 31 l I 3113 I C 4411 I I 4 511 a 4101 42-11 '� 4301 ❑ ❑ j 4i I l I � j / 4zpl X: 34 41 4101 43oq I 42061 J L ■ 4 109 , 5TAI PS, 1!i STAIRS I 3435 i \ I I 44-07 4}4 o5 44-03 3335 1 4 307 4305 41✓03 34'fl 341. - 3235 _T4 7 4207 4205 4}2.03 333`1 33 37 31% i� 41 o7 4105 4105 i 32 3237 1 7 �/z • \ v \ I � ■ r. ■ I I / BUILDI';0 DEPAU"J"NT ( CITY OF NEW` , ^ _dC CA \ , APPROVAL OF TNESE PEA:rS G:-_' NCT ;'-;: '•'.�' c AUTNCOQATIOit TO �- �!`::- \ �•�a, EJII�. TENT pIT9 iRE ;AC,H:r, S'. .- ! AESPE TNi!airnt,YALn4�Lir'c'.i RESPECTS W CG; 'diCE ":r :.. 7Ji:5�NG n.0 :.• .' .:5, PEWVS ANO POLICIES FNc CITr fb vc,Yxa-:k ■ \ \ \ REC+JI?E ANY PE3161!7EE TO .^E':ISE TNc 5::L". - _' _:: •_ 6h;4i TO ?4G•r?c \ LENT .'� •.q C17:IONE. I'Aw y1' ?NESE PLWV?_ 5cn q; .� OR : rT-p TON. If NECESSARY 7O LOAIDLT W:?: -� ' F NEC. �� \ •- ' ` •��!""C P07C1E5 GF i nE CITY Of NEWoORT SEACP.. � APPLICANT'S ACNNOWLEAIEl 3 PueLlcwoRAs _`-_ 3 317 321 cl \ TAAFRC �— 3217 31►Cj \ p AN �� T 3117 ADVP.OY:� iG I� �U— E BT: \i 322! \ I 3423 \\ 3123 , 3F25 34 27 I\. 31Z7 \ - I 3333 \ \ 32 33 3431 3133 3331 3429 \ 3231 �z29 \ 3131 3129 \ • IIIII�II SANTA BARBARA ZRIVE bi r E: !t �'. � :� •�. .4 c.., . � i i � t - : E-. � { _ F, r .. -. . - � .- � - ; � - � r -. , I -�' � . ; r1N s - .� , --._t 7 -.. L`i..-, :.-._nPS" --..-.-,.�-_..-.a .t .c .- - ._ �..__. - v-c:-- _-s .�_ ... r-..- .», - _ .Y' 1�-- r .. --4��,1.!.- - - - ._ __ _ -,-___ ... -_-. _•_•_.-. _ _ .• _-_ � -___ ._. -._ ___. _. ___. _--- _ _ _ .. .. _ _. _ -.. ._. .. _ _ ..-.-. _l�'� ._ i _. April 24,1996 TO: Genia Garcia, Planning Department FROM: Eileen Johansen, Administrative Services Department SUBJECT: Addressing Plan for Block 800, Newport Condominium Project I have no problem with the proposed plan if emergency response does not mind having odd and even addressing mixed on each side of the street. Another approach would be to have buildings 1000 and 3000 on the west side of the private entry street and buildings 2000 and 4000 on the east side. However, numbering the buildings in sequence is also logical and I would accept either plan. Thank you. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.8915 June 3, 1996 Gannon Design Moira J. Boynton 112 East Chapman Suite G Orange, CA 92666 Subject: "The Colony" Apartments, 875 San Clemente, Tract 15178 Dear Moira: Pursuant to your request, staff has approved your request to establish an addressing plan for the Colony Apartments to be constructed on the above referenced property. The addressing plan is approved as follows: 1 st number of the address represents the Building number 2nd number of the address represents the floor level 3rd and 4th number of the address represents the unit number All addresses are located on a new street located off of San Clemente Drive to be named "Colony Plaza" on the Final Tract Map No. 15178. The Recreation Room/Leasing Office shall be addressed at 5100 Colony Plaza; the Guard House at the entrance shall be addressed at 5101 Colony Plaza. Additional accessory structures shall continue with 5103, 5105, etc. Please be advised that the Newport Beach Fire Department must approve the final signs for the building numbering prior to the completion of the project. Section 9.04270 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code requires appropriate street address numbers on -each building. It is your responsibility to notify all affected agencies (i.e., Post Office, utility companies, etc.) of all new addresses. If you have any questions or require further assistance, please do, not hesitate to contact me. 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach PLANNING DEPARTMENT Gema Garcia Associate Planner cc: Building Permit Counter Building Department -records Fire Department - records Public Works Department - Subdivision Engineer Police Department - records Planning Department - records Administrative Services ---records—? GANNON DESIGN DESIGN Sign Programs/Cnlena April 15, 1996 Community Development CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Enclosed for your approval: Address sequencing for the Tentative Tract 15178, apartment property owned by Irvine Apartment Communities. Addressing is set up, as follows: 2- �? 15 1st number "2" Represents the Building # 2nd number "3" Represents the floor level 3rd and 4th number "15" Represents the unit number Each buiding address sequencing begins to the immediate left of the arched entryway and proceeds in a clockwise direction. Please contact me at 714/538-5591 (Gannon Design) with your comments or corrections. Submitted by: Moira J. Boynton 112 East Chapman Suite G Orange, CA 92666 714/538-5591 FAX 714/538-0760 i w i i " 0 vial%+a "r A WF ve OWYIe.V: Irvihe �kp�`{YW.vid-Cow�r��c,v�,if tQ.a I ram, fv(I t No. 15178 41 440� 0061 441I I ¢ I0 410ci l 42Il STAIF�s 4110 41 Ill 408 44.12 420� ¢2ls 12 410`d 4112 4407 437 4313 4107 = IW O c4120�0 4/401 410(0 +Sol 11405 4z01 4 9 MIDI Joe -r 43"_ 4 I 4204 4303 o2- c}2113 120Z 4104 4103 41oz P J 34o2 3302 3403 1 3404 3305 3205 3202 3102 513 ! 37-63 33D4 3z04 3105 344ol 3103 3f04 32D1 31ot 3¢om 3422 3� 3307 3322 3Z07 -- J 31CYv 31oi 3421 3321 �i221 31Z1 D� l 1 Y, f r i s4113 341� 3318 321� 311g 31101 331 D 33ai 3ii o 3�fr i 3311 ' ?j21I 3111 ` 3glZ 3zli 3nz 313 �13 310 5414 �17 31I4 3317 3a-I<o 3415 3217 331(0 3313 3117 321(0 32I5 31 I, 311 h 0 r T1410 13 !0 lzlo 1110 14oq `- I MCI lzoq 110q 1408 Ii2o0'6 (� 1128 1 3o(o IZC(o I IOIo STAIRS 1405 1.60 205 1105 1411 1412 1413 Mil 1312 1313 1 Izll 1212 1213 IIII 1112 1113 1404 IB04 120 110 1414 131 Ilu 4 57AIKS 1415 1315 1215 I Ills 141(a iwl 1201 1101 t�- 140z 13o z 12oz 110z r I i I 2402 2302 2202. 21o2 � a4o1 2wi 2201 � 2101 2414 2314 i 2413 23 a 112- 1 2 2112 240:5 2303 2293 2103 2411 -,2.410 2311 2SIO 2211 2210 till 2110 24o4 2?04 2204 2104 2105 2406 22° 27 2W7 23p�6 2[09 „f r April 17, 1996 TO: Steve Bunting, Fire Department Eileen Johansen, Administrative Services FROM: Genia Garcia, Planning Department SUBJECT: Addressing Plan for the Block 800, Newport Center Condominium Project Attached please find the proposed addressing plan for the above referenced project. Please review, comment and return to me as soon as possible. If you need to see the construction drawings for clarification, please let me know. Thank you. GANNON DESIGN DESIGN Sign Programs/Criteria April 15, 1996 Community Development CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Enclosed for your approval: Address sequencing for the Tentative Tract 15178, apartment property owned by Irvine Apartment Communities. Addressing is set up as follows: z-,�15 1st number "2" Represents the Building # 2nd number "3" Represents the floor level 3rd and 4th number "15" Represents the unit number Each buiding address sequencing begins to the immediate left of the arched entryway and proceeds in a clockwise direction. Please contact me at 714/538-5591 (Gannon Design) with your comments or corrections. C d�mi4inrl Mn ��niro i Qnvn+nn �`j 112 East Chapman Suite G Orange, CA 92666 714/538-5591 FAX 714/538-0760 MEMORANDUM Newport Beach Fire and Marine Department Fire Prevention Division Date: February 22,1996 To: Genia Garcia From: Steve Bunting Subject: Addressing Plan for the Newport Center Apartment Project The addressing plan for the aforementioned project has been reviewed and approved by the Fire Department. Please advise the owners that the Fire Department will determine the proper signs for the building numbering as a condition of final approval near the completion of the project. GANNON DESIGN DESIGN Sign Programs/CrIleria April 15, 1996 Community Development CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Enclosed for your approval: Address sequencing for the Tentative Tract 15178, apartment property owned by Irvine Apartment Communities. Addressing is set up as follows: 1st number "2" Represents the Building # 2nd number "3" Represents the floor level 3rd and 4th number "15" Represents the unit number Each buiding address sequencing begins to the immediate left of the arched entryway and proceeds in a clockwise direction. Please contact me at 714/538-5591 (Gannon Design) with your comments or corrections. Submitted by: Moira J. Boynton 112 East Chapman Suite G Orange, CA 92666 714/538-5591 FAX 714/538-0760 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-8915 i June 3, 1996 Gannon Design Moira J. Boynton 112 East Chapman Suite G Orange, CA 92666 Subject: "The Colony" Apartments, 875 San Clemente, Tract 15178 Dear Moira: Pursuant to your request, staff has approved your request to establish an addressing plan for the Colony Apartments to be constructed on the above referenced property. The addressing plan is approved as follows: I st number of the address represents the Building number 2nd number of the address represents the floor level 3rd and 4th number of the address represents the unit number All addresses are located on a new street located off of San Clemente Drive to be named "Colony Plaza" on the Final Tract Map No. 15178. The Recreation Room/Leasing Office shall be addressed at 5100 Colony Plaza; the Guard House at the entrance shall be addressed at 5101 Colony Plaza. Additional accessory structures shall continue with 5103, 5105, etc. Please be advised that the Newport Beach Fire Department must approve the final signs for the building numbering prior to the completion of the project. Section 9.04270 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code requires appropriate street address numbers on each building. It is your responsibility to notify all affected agencies (i.e., Post Office, utility companies, etc.) of all new addresses. If you have any questions or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach PLANNING DEPARTMENT BJU Genia Garcia Associate Planner cc: Building Permit Counter Building Department -records Fire Department - records Public Works Department - Subdivision Engineer Police Department - records Planning Department - records Administrative Services - records t ice---t kll2j�-O"6 13144`240-5lyll 1412 1413 1z14 2402 23031311 1312 1313 I114 Z302 2203STA 1211 IZI2 1213 2202 2I03till 1112 1113 STAIRS 2.10z I145L 2401 315Z301 1215 2201 I u5 2l0l 14C0 2414 1407 J tat 2314 1a0'7 1207 1107 1440011 1 24t3 E 140(o 1z0 1 23 3 i zo t30fo 1101 21�3 IZo(o IIDIo 1403 t402. 23ja 2411 2410 STRICzs 14.04 120 , 1302 2212 2311 2310 a 1405 i4 II G3 ilDi J 2112 2211 2210 17o5 1104 I —�_�-- yIl 2uo I105 O L#0 rf 2404 2394 22044 21 2407 22 210q 22og 2105 4- 30M 10 .4411 34oz 1 r d311 33p2 3403 3404 3303 330� 410� a�10 ii 3205 32os� 33r�i 4 no k21i 3202 3303 33D4 3105 3l0� 3 STAtRs 4111 31f72 3Z03 3204 16q 43005 3103 04 4¢¢412 3401 4208 4212 I 41006 4112 3101 Wfo 347 440-7 4 3�k22 330& 3307 4-207 4313 3322 1 3zo(o 3Z07 4107 — — 3100 3107 e4w(a I 3421 t 42.0ro j4e,o 33z 1 4101� 3221, ' 42 5 4205 �-34 20 3418 �}}l74404 44D3 33�p34�� 3318 33174304 4303 3220 33j1 32IS 3217 334204 42D3 3120 31,1$ iSill 324104 gto3 I 311;01 ' 31110 33I D 321 b 300 3311 y`4 321 I (j 311 ! 311 Z �13 3113 3414 3314 311$ 315 3215 3H5 i 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 EXHIBIT "A" FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT AND OPEN SPACE AGREEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 148 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 6 TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 82 AMENDMENT NO.763 AMENDMENT NO. 764' AMENDMENT NO. 765 AMENDMENT NO. 766 AMENDMENT NO. 767 AMENDMENT NO.768 AMENDMENT NO. 769 AMENDMENT NO. 770 A Environmental Impact Report No 148 Finding, 1. That a Program Environmental Impact Report has been prepared for the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines and City Policy. 2. That all potential significant environmental effects which could result from the project have been identified and analyzed in the EIR. 3. That based upon the information contained in the Environmental Impact Report, mitigation measures have been identified and incorporated into the project to reduce potentially significant environmental effects to a level of insignificance, except in the areas of Aesthetics/Light and Glare, Biology, and Public Services and Utilities, and that the remaining environmental effects are significant only on a cumulative basis. Further, that the economic and social benefits to the community override the remaining significant environmental effect anticipated as a result of the project. 4. That the information contained in the Environmental Impact Report has been considered in the various decisions made relative to this project. Final Findings and Conditions - CIOSA Page 1 Mitigation Measures: Aesthetics/Light and Glare 1. In conjunction with site plan review, the project proponent shall prepare a detailed temporary grading and landscape plan for the bluff top setback area for the purpose of minimizing bluff erosion. If graded slopes from a development area extend into the bluff top setback area, as proposed by the PC Text, the project proponent shall prepare detailed final grading and landscape plans for the bluff top setback area. The plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department, Planning Department, Public Works Department, and Building Department. Transportation/Circulation 2. The City shall prepare a circulation improvement monitoring program to direct expenditures of funds received under the Development Agreement to make improvements and to monitor the status of those improvements. The list of improvements to be implemented shall initially be based on those identified on Table V, with prioritization established based on technical need and ability to implement them in a timely manner. Flexibility to add or delete projects on the list should be maintained to respond to actual changes in traffic volumes and the ability of the City to accomplish improvements so long as the projected Net Benefit to the circulation system is maintained. Thereafter, a review of the improvements' priority and implementation status shall be done in conjunction with the City's annual Congestion Management Program and Growth Management Program analysis and the annual review of the Development Agreement. 3. The applicant or successor in interest shall construct or post bond for all frontage improvements identified in the Development Agreement and listed in Table B of the Program EIR. Air Qualitx 4. All grading related to the project shall be conducted in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. This mitigation measure shall be made a condition of all grading permits related to the project. 5. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations while construction activities are being conducted, fugitive dust emission shall be controlled using the following procedures: • Graded sections of the project that will not be further disturbed or worked on for long periods of time (three months or more) shall be seeded and watered or covered with plastic sheeting to retard wind erosion. Final Findings and Conditions - QOSA Page 2 • Graded sections of the project which are undergoing further disturbance or construction activities shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. These mitigation measures shall be made a condition of all grading permits related to the project. 6. During grading and construction activities, the applicant shall further control fugitive dust emissions using the following measures: • On -site vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 miles per hour. Entrances to all on -site roads shall be posted with a sign indicating the maximum speed limits on all unpaved roads. • All areas with vehicle traffic shall be periodically watered. • Streets adjacent to the project site shall be swept as needed to remove silt which may have accumulated from construction activities so as to prevent accumulations of excessive amounts of dust. These mitigation measures shall be made a condition of all. grading permits related to the project,,-- 7. Office and commercial development on the Corporate Plaza West and Bay View Landing site shall also participate in the Centerride program currently in operation in the Newport Center area. Evidence of intent to participate shall be provided to the City of Newport Beach Building Department prior to issuance of occupancy permit. 8. Bicycle racks shall be required in accordance with the City of Newport Beach Transportation Demand Ordinance. 9. Construction of related frontage improvements shall include bus turnouts and shelters if determined to be necessary and desirable by the Orange County Transit District and/or the City of Newport Beach. Prior to final design and construction of any frontage improvements, the City of Newport Beach shall contact the Orange County Transit District to determine if any bus turnouts or shelters will be required. 10. Ali development shall include street and security lighting (in parking lots and pedestrian walkway areas) which is energy conserving. A lighting plan shall be submitted for all development which demonstrates compliance with this measure. The plan shall be reviewed by the Tl'anning Department, and approved by the Department of Public Works. 11. Residential, commercial and office development shall be landscaped with an emphasis on drought resistant plant species which will shade buildings and reduce Final Findings and Conditions - CIOSA Page 3 water and energy consumption during the summer. A landscape plan shall be submitted for all development which demonstrates compliance with this measure. The plan shall be reviewed by the Planning Department, and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. Noise 12. The applicant shall ensure that all residential lots and dwellings are sound attenuated against present and projected noise, which shall be the sum of all noise impacting the project, so as not to exceed an exterior standard of 65 dB CNEL in outdoor living areas and an interior standard of 45 dB CNEL in all habitable rooms. Evidence shall be prepared under the supervision of a City certified acoustical consultant which demonstrates that these standards will be satisfied in a manner consistent with applicable zoning regulations and submitted as follows: A. Prior to the recordation of a final tract/parcel map or prior to the issuance of Grading Permits, at the sole discretion of the City, an Acoustical Analysis Report shall be submitted to the City's Advance Planning Manager for approval. The report shall describe in detail the exterior noise environment and preliminary mitigation measures. Acoustical design features to achieve interior noise standards may be included in the report in which case it may also satisfy "B" below. B. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, an acoustical analysis report describing the acoustical design features of the structures required to satisfy the exterior and interior noise standards shall be submitted to the Advance Planning Manager for approval along with satisfactory evidence which indicates that the sound attenuation measures specified in the approved acoustical report(s) have been incorporated into the design of the project. C. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, all freestanding acoustical barriers must be shown on the projects plot plan illustrating height, location and construction in a manner meeting the approval of the City's Advance Planning Manager. D. Prior to the issuance of any Certificates of Use and Occupancy, field testing in accordance with Title 25 regulations may be required by the Planning Director to verify compliance with STC and HC design standards. 13. All non-residential structures shall be sound attenuated against the combined impact of all present and projected noise from exterior noise sources to meet the interior noise criteria as specified in the Noise Element. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, evidence shall be prepared under the supervision of a City certified acoustical consultant that these standards will be satisfied and shall be submitted to the Mapager,.Advance Planning in the form of an Final Findings and Conditions - CIOSA Page 4 Acoustical Analysis Report describing in detail the exterior noise environment and the acoustical design features required to achieve the interior noise standard and which indicate that the sound attenuation measures specified have been incorporated into the design of the project. 14. All freestanding acoustical barriers shall be a berm, wall or combination berm and wall. Walls shall not contain holes or gaps. Walls shall be constructed of slumpstone or other masonry material. Final acoustical barrier heights and locations shall be determined when final grading plans are developed showing lot locations, house/building setbacks and precise pad elevation. Biological Resources 15. Pursuant to Section 1601-1603 of the State of California Fish and Game Code, the California Department of Fish and Game shall be notified of any alterations to streambed habitats. The applicant or any successors in interest shall be responsible for notifying the Department of Fish and Game regarding any grading related to residential development and associated improvements on the San Diego Creek South, Upper Castaways, Newporter North, and Freeway Reservation sites which would alter streambed habitats. The applicant or any successor in interest shall notify the Department of Fish and Game and obtain any necessary permit prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Copies of -proper notification and necessary permits shall bw provided to the "City of Newport Beach prior to issuance of a grading permit: The City of Newport Beach shall be responsible for notifying the Department of Fish and' Game regarding any grading related to any public improvements (e.g. trails, recreational facilities, roads, drainage facilities, etc.) in areas designated for open space, public facilities, and/or parks which would alter streambed habitats. The City of Newport Beach shall notify the Department of Fish and Game and obtain any necessary permits prior to commencement of any grading which could alter the streambed habitat. The permits issued by the Department of Fish and Game pursuant to Sections 1601-1603 may require additional mitigation measures deemed necessary by the Department. 16. Wetland delineation studies in accordance and conjunction with the California Department of Fish and Game and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permitting processes shall be performed for any wetland which will be impacted by grading and construction activities. The applicant or any successor in interest shall be responsible for conducting the wetland delineation studies for wetlands impacted by residential development or associated improvements on the Newporter North and Upper Castaways sites. If residential development or associated improvements on the San Diego Creek South or Freeway Reservation sites encroach into the Bonita Creek wetland, the applicant or any successor in interest shall be responsible for conducting the wetland delineation study. The City of Newport Beach shall be responsible for conducting the wetland delineation studies for wetlands impacted by any public improvements/facilities in areas designated for open space, public facilities, and/or parks which will encroach into wetlands. The studies shall occur at the time specific Final Findings and Conditions - CIOSA Page 5 site plans and grading plans are available and prior to issuance of any grading permits or commencement of grading activities in areas containing wetland habitat. 17. Public use and related facility development for areas proposed,for natural open space and passive park uses within the Upper Castaways, Newporter North, Newporter Knoll, Bay View Landing, Freeway Reservation, and Jamboree/MacArthur sites shall be designed to be sensitive to existing biological resources. To this end, facility plans and public uses for these areas shall be prepared in consultation with a qualified biologist who shall determine that such plans and uses do not adversely impact sensitive resources identified on these sites (e.g. wetlands, coastal sage scrub, etc.). If necessary, additional environmental documentation shall be prepared at the time facility plans are prepared to determine if significant adverse impacts beyond those anticipated in this Program EIR will occur. If new significant adverse impacts are identified, additional mitigation measures shall be adopted. 18. Grading, earthmoving, and any related construction activities related to residential development and associated improvements on the Upper Castaways, San Diego Creek South, Bay View Landing, and Newporter North sites shall be restricted as follows: Upper Castaways and Newporter North - No grading (except that necessary for trail establishment and improvements, erosion control or bluff stabilization), stockpiling of soil or operation of equipment shall take place within the bluff top setback area established by the Bluff Top setback Ordinance. San Diego Creek South - No grading, stockpiling of soils, or operation of equipment shall encroach into the area of Bonita Creek beyond the existing 15 foot elevation contour. Newporter North - No grading, stockpiling of soils or operation of equipment shall take place below the existing 60 foot elevation contour surrounding the John Wayne Gulch freshwater marsh. Bay View Landing - no grading, stockpiling of soil or operation of equipment shall encroach into the hillside above the 25-foot contour of the lower development area. 19. Prior to grading and/or constructing any public facility on the San Diego Creek North site which will encroach into the on -site freshwater marsh, the City of Newport Beach (or other public agency responsible for development of the public facility) shall approve and begin implementation of a plan which shall offset the loss of wetlands. This plan shall reflect all mitigation requirements of any State or Federal agency having jurisdiction over the affected wetlands. Offsets shall be achieved by either creating a new freshwater marsh on -site or enhancing and expanding an existing freshwater marsh in or near the San Diego Creek and Upper Newport Bay Ecological Reserve. 20. Prior to grading and/or constructing any residential development or associated improvement on the Upper Castaways site which will encroach into the on -site freshwater marsh, the applicant or successor in interest shall prepare and begin implementation of a plan which shall offset the loss of wetlands. This plan shall reflect all mitigation requirements of any State or Federal agency having jurisdiction over the affected wetlands. Offsets shall be achieved by either creating a new Final Findings and Conditions - CIOSA Page 6 freshwater marsh on -site or enhancing and expanding an existing freshwater marsh in or near the Upper Newport Bay Ecological Reserve. A copy of the plan and all related permits shall be presented to the City of Newport Beach prior to issuance of a grading permit. 21. Prior to grading and/or constructing any residential development or associated improvement on the Newporter North site which will encroach into the on -site freshwater marsh, the applicant or successor in interest shall prepare and begin implementation of a plan which shall offset the loss of wetlands. This plan shall reflect all mitigation requirements of any State or Federal agency having jurisdiction over the affected wetlands. Offsets shall be achieved by either creating a new freshwater marsh on -site or enhancing and expanding an existing freshwater marsh in or near the Upper Newport Bay Ecological Reserve. A copy of the plan and all related permits shall be presented to the City of Newport Beach prior to issuance of a grading permit. 22. Development on the San Diego Creek South site shall be designed so as to reduce the amount of light and glare which could ,potentially spill over into the wetland habitats of Bonita Creek and San Diego Creek. This can be achieved by a variety of means including a combination of sensitive siting of lighted buildings; use of lighting systems which conceal the light source and minimize light spillage and glare; screening walls/berms; and dense landscaping along the edge of the development. Any landscaped edge screening shall include non-invasive trees and shrubs. The plant palette for the screening vegetation shall consist of dense, evergreen species which, when mixed, achieve canopy and understory of elements to provide as much screening as possible. The site plan and landscape plan for this edge shall be prepared in consultation with a City -approved, qualified biologist. The site plan and landscape plan shall be approved by the City Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits. 23. Prior to commencing grading, all wetlands habitat in areas intended for preservation shall be temporarily fenced. This measure shall pertain only when grading, stock- piling, or other construction activities are proposed within 100 feet of the boundaries of the wetland area. A plan identifying the wetland area and the location of the fencing shall be submitted to the City of Newport Beach prior to issuance of any grading permit. 24. This measure shall apply to the Newporter North, Newporter Knoll, Bay View Landing, Upper Castaways, San Diego Creek South and San Diego Creek North sites. Revegetation of cut and fill slopes, bluff stabilization/remediation areas, fuel modification zones and other graded areas adjacent to existing sensitive habitat areas (e.g. at the edge of development of residential, public facilities, or recreational areas) shall be accomplished with plant palettes containing predominantly native species. Steeper slopes (greater than 2:1) shall be revegetated with a mixture of coastal sage scrub species including California sage brush which now dominates coastal sage scrub used by California gnatcatchers. Portions of more level areas shall be revegetated Final Findings and Conditions - CIOSA Page 7 with species of native perennial grasses in an attempt to establish native grassland. An expert in landscape revegetation, who is knowledgeable and qualified in native plant mixtures shall provide consultation into the preparation of landscape plans to ensure that this measure is complied with. Landscape plans shall be approved by the City Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits for private development or commencement of grading for public facilities and public recreation- al uses. 25. All non -emergency grading related to bluff stabilization/remediation on the Newporter North and Bay View Landing sites shall occur during the non -breeding season for the California gnatcatcher. The non -breeding season is from August 1 to January 31. Earth Resources Faulting and Seismicity 26. Buildings four stories in height or higher shall be designed in accordance with requirements for seismic zone 4 as outlined in Chapter 23 of the Uniform Building Code and/or with the benefit of a site specific seismic ground response spectrum study which would be prepared by the project geotechnical consultant and structural engineer to allow matching of building period with site period. The structural plans and/or ground response study shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 27. Buildings less than four stories in height shall be designed by a Structural Engineer in accordance with UBC Chapter 23 requirements for Seismic Zone 4. Non -critical structures shall be designed to withstand strong ground shaking that may accompany a maximum probable earthquake along the Newport -Inglewood Fault. Critical structures (i.e., hospitals, fire/police facilities, schools, etc.) shall be designed to withstand strong ground shaking associated with a maximum credible earthquake on the Newport -Inglewood Fault. Structural plans, including seismic design calcula- tions/parameters, shall be approved by the City Building Department prior to issuance of building permits. 28. Habitable buildings shall not beplaced adjacent to (above or below) slopes or bluffs where seismic induced slope or bluff failure could occur. Though -the City has established a Bluff Setback Criteria for development on the top -of -bluff (Develop- ment Policy D.2.b.1 of the Newport Beach General Plan, January 21, 1991, and Newport Municipal Code section 20.151.080), the City minimum setbacks may not necessarily be adequate from a geotechnical viewpoint concerning bluff/slope instability during an earthquake. Areas potentially prone to such failures shall be identified and further evaluated by the project Geotechnical Consultant during the Tentative Tract Map review and Grading Plan review stage. The evaluation shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the Building Department prior to the issuance of Final Finding and Conditions - CIOSA Page 8 grading permits. Grading and building plans shall reflect the recommendations of the evaluation to the satisfaction of the Building Department. 29. In accordance with the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone Act, a Registered Geologist shall further evaluate and make recommendations regarding the potential for ground surface rupture effecting proposed development on -sites where "Potentially Active Faults" have been identified (Bay View Landing and Freeway Reservation sites) or on any other of the sites where Potentially Active Faults are identified in the future. The study shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Building Department and shall be prepared prior to approval of a tentative tract map or grading permit whichever comes first. Grading and building plans shall reflect the recommendations of the study to the satisfaction of the Building Department. Liquefaction 30. Sites where the potential for liquefaction has been identified, or any other site where the potential for liquefaction may be encountered during subsequent investigations, shall be further evaluated by a geotechnical consultant. The evaluation shall include subsurface investigation with standard penetration testing or other appropriate means of analysis for liquefaction potential. The project geotechnical consultant shall provide a statement concerning the potential for liquefaction and its possible impact on proposed development. If necessary, the geotechnical consultant shall provide mitigation measures which could include mechanical densiflcation of liquefiable layers, dewatering, fill surcharging or other appropriate measures. The Geotechnical Consultant's report shall be signed by a Certified Engineering Geologist and a Registered Civil Engineer and shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the Building Department prior to issuance of Grading Permit. Grading and building plans shall reflect the recommendations of the study to the satisfaction of the Building Department. Erosion 31. Any necessary diversion devices, catchment devices, or velocity reducers shall be incorporated into the grading plan and approved by the City Grading Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Berms or other catchment devices shall be incorporated into the grading plans to divert sheet flow runoff away from areas which have been stripped of natural vegetation. Velocity reducers shalt be incorporated into the design, especially where drainage devices exit to natural ground. 32. All fill slopes shall be properly compacted during grading in conformance with the City Grading Code and verified by the project Geotechnical Consultant. Slopes shall be planted with vegetation upon completion of grading. Conformance with this measure shall be verified by the City Grading Engineer prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. Final Findings and Conditions - CIOSA Page 9 33. Berms and brow ditches shall be constructed to the satisfaction and approval of the City Grading Engineer. Water shall not be allowed to drain over any manufactured slope face. Top -of -slope soil berms shall be incorporated into grading plans to prevent surface runoff from draining over future fill slopes. Brow ditches shall be incorporated into grading plans to divert surficial runoff from ungraded natural areas around future cut slopes. The design of berms and brow ditches shall be approved by the City Grading Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. 34. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, appropriate artificial substances shall be recommended by the project landscape architect and approved by the City Grading Engineer for use in reducing surface erosion until permanent landscaping is well established. Upon completion of grading, stripped areas shall be covered with artificial substances approved by the City Grading Engineer. 35. Drainage of both surface and subsurface water over or toward the bluffs on the Upper Castaways and Newporter North sites shall be minimized. Though some drainage of rainwater over the bluff face cannot be avoided, drainage control devices shall be designed to direct excess water from site improvements away from the bluff face. Irrigation shall be controlled to prevent excessive infiltration into the subsurface. The project Civil Engineer shall design grading plans to minimize surface runoff over the bluff faces. The project Geotechnical Consultant shall provide recommendations to minimize subsurface "water migration toward the bluff faces prior to approval of Tentative Tract maps or site plans. All design criteria for the control of surficial and subsurface water shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Grading Engineer. Bluff and Slope Instability 36. The project geotechnical consultant shall review the tentative tract map and grading plan for each site and prepare a report addressing all salient geotechnical issues related to bluff and slope stability of any existing bluff or slopes. These reports shall include: 1) detailed analysis of field data including surface and subsurface geological mapping; 2) laboratory testing results; 3) stability analysis of existing bluffs and proposed slopes as illustrated on the tentative tract map or rough grading plan; 4) conclusions; 5) recommendations for mitigation of any identified unstable bluffs or slopes and/or for additional investigation. These reports shall be signed by a Certified Engineering Geologist and a Registered Civil Engineer and shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Grading Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. 37. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Project geotechnical consultant and/or civil engineer shall make written recommendations for manufactured slope stabilization including, but not limited to, buttressing, rock bolting, grouting, slope gradient laybacks, or retaining walls. All necessary recommendations shall be included in the grading plan to the satisfaction of the City Grading Engineer. Final Findings and Conditions - QOSA Page 10 38. Though the City has established a Bluff Setback Criteria for development on the top - of -bluff (Development Policy D.2.b.1 of the Newport Beach General Plan, January 21,1991, and Newport Beach Municipal Code section 20.151.080), the City minimum setbacks may not necessarily be adequate from a geotechnical viewpoint concerning bluff/slope instability. Prior to issuance of grading permits, appropriate safe bluff top setback recommendations shall be determined by the project Geotechnical Consultant based on the evaluation required by Mitigation Measure 3 to the satisfaction of the City Grading Engineer. 39. During grading a geotechnical consultant shall monitor grading operations to ensure that recommendations for slope instability mitigation are implemented. Additionally, the geotechnical consultant shall evaluate slopes as they are graded through geologic mapping and analysis to ensure that no unanticipated conditions are present. Slope stability mitigation recommendations may require modification during grading. Compliance with this measure shall be verified by the Building Department. 40. Prior to issuance of building permits, the geotechnical consultant shall prepare a Rough Grading Report and As -Graded Geotechnical Map for each graded site at the completion of grading of that site. The Report shall summarize and document compliance with all mitigation measures. The Rough Grading Report shall include a statement regarding the adequacy of the manufactured slopes for their intended use and a statement regarding the adequacy of the recommended bluff setbacks. The report shall be signed by a Certified Engineering Geologist and a Registered Civil Engineer and shall be approved by the City Grading Engineer. Compressible/Collapsible Soil 41. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, written recommendations for the mitigation of compressible/collapsible soil potential for each site shall be provided by the geotechnical consultant. Foundation recommendations shall be included. Recom- mendations shall be incorporated as conditions of approval for the site -specific tentative tract maps and grading plans to the satisfaction of the City Grading Engineer. Recommendations shall be based on surface and subsurface mapping, laboratory testing and analysis. Mitigation, if necessary, could include: removal and recompaction of identified compressible/collapsible zones, fill surcharging and settlement monitoring, compaction grouting, or foundation design which utilizes deep piles, or other recommended measures. The geotechnical consultant's site -specific reports shall be signed by a Certified Engineering Geologist and Registered Civil Engineer, and shall be approved by the City Grading Engineer. Expansive/Corrosive Soil 42. Written recommendations for the mitigation of expansive and corrosive soil potential for each site, shall be provided by the project corrosion consultant, geotechnical consultant and/or Civil engineer. Foundation recommendations shall be included. Recommendations shall be based on surface and subsurface mapping, laboratory Final Findings and Conditions - CIOSA Page 11 testing and analysis and shall be incorporated into final building plans prior to issuance of building permits. The geotechnical consultant's site -specific reports shall be signed by a Certified Engineering Geologist and Registered City Engineer, and shall be approved by the City Grading Engineer. Near Surface Groundwater 43. The project geotechnical consultant and/or civil engineer shall prepare written site - specific reviews of the tentative tract maps and grading plans addressing all salient geotechnical issues, including groundwater. These reports shall provide findings, conclusions and recommendations regarding near -surface groundwater and the potential for artificially induced groundwater as a result of future development, and the effects groundwater may have on existing or future bluffs, slopes and structures. The reports shall also address the potential for ground subsidence on the sites and properties adjacent to the sites if dewatering is recommended. The geotechnical consultant and/or civil engineer's reports shall be signed by a Certified Engineering Geologist and Registered Civil Engineer and shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Grading Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Water Resources Water Quality 44. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall provide to the Building and Public Works Departments haul route plans that include a description of haul routes, access points to the sites and watering and sweeping program designed to minimize impacts of the haul operation. These plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. Copies of the plans shall be submitted to the City's Planning Department. 45. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall incorporate the following erosion control methods into grading plans and operations to the satisfaction of the City Grading Engineer and Building Department. a. An approved material such as straw, wood chips, plastic or similar materials shall be used to stabilize graded areas prior to revegetation or construction. b. Air -borne and vehicle -borne sediment shall be controlled during construction by: the regular sprinkling of exposed soils; and the moistening of vehicles loads. C. As approved material such as rip rap (a ground cover of large, loose, angular stones) shall be used to stabilize any slopes with seepage problems to protect the top soils in areas of concentrated runoff. Final Findings and Conditions - CIOSA Page 12 d. During the period of construction activity, existing vegetation which will be retained on -site shall be protected from traffic by the use of fences. If appropriate, buffer strips or vegetative filter strips, such as tall stands of grass, can be used as an alternative and/or supplementary method to protect against sediment buildup. 46. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project geotechnical consultant and/or civil engineer shalldevelop a plan for the diversion of stormwater away from any exposed slopes during grading and construction activities. The plan shall include the use of temporary right-of-way diversions (i.e., berms or swales) located at disturbed areas or graded right-of-ways. The plan will be approved by the City Engineer and Building Departments and implemented during grading and construction activities. 47. The applicant shall provide a temporary gravel entrance located at every construction site entrance. The location of this entrance shall be incorporated into grading plans prior to the issuance of grading permits. To reduce or eliminate mud and sediment carried by vehicles or runoff onto public rights -of -way, the gravel shall cover the entire width of the entrance, and its length shall be no less than fifty feet. The entrance plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Grading Engineer concurrent with review and approval of grading plans. 48. The applicant shall construct filter berms or other approved device for the temporary gravel entrance. The berms shall consist of a ridge of gravel placed across graded right-of-ways to decrease and filter runoff levels while permitting construction traffic to continue. The location of berms shall be incorporated into grading plans prior to the issuance of grading permits. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Grading Engineer. 49. During grading and construction, the applicant shall provide a temporary sediment basin located at the point of greatest runoff from any construction area. The location of this basin shall be incorporated into grading plans. It shall consist of an embankment of compacted soils across a drainage. The basin shall not be located in an area where its failure would lead to a loss of life or the loss of service of public utilities or roads. The plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Grading Engineer. Drainage Patterns 50. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the master plans of water, sewer and storm drain facilities shall be approved by the City Engineer. Any systems shown to be required by the review shall be the responsibility of the developer, unless otherwise provided for through an agreement with the property owner or serving Agency. Final Findings and Conditions - CIOSA Page 13 Cultural Resources Archaeology ALL PROJECT SrrES 51. All sites shall be mitigated pursuant to Council Policy K-5. Where further testing or salvage is required, the applicant shall select a City -approved qualified archaeologist to excavate a sample of the site. All testing and salvage shall be conducted prior to issuance of grading permits or use of an area for recreational purposes. A written report summarizing the findings of the testing and data recovery program shall be submitted to the Planning Department within 90 days of the completed data recovery program. 52. The applicant shall donate all archaeological material, historic, or prehistoric, recovered during the project, to a local institution which has the proper facilities for curation, display and study by qualified scholars. All material shall be transferred to the approved facility after laboratory analysis and a report have been completed. The appropriate local institution shall be approved by the Planning Department based on a recommendation from the qualified archaeologist. 53. Any excavation of a site located within the Coastal zone of more than two surface meters of dirt shall require a coastal development permit prior to commencing the excavation. All provisions of the California Coastal Commission guidelines shall be complied with. UPPER CASTAWAYS 54. Prior to any grading related to development of the bluff trail system, open space uses or bluff stabilization which could impact CA-Ora-49 and CA Ora-186 on the Upper Castaways site, the sites shall be subjected to test excavations by a City approved archaeologist (experienced in both historic and pre -historic archaeology) to determine site integrity, extent and significance. The methodology of the test excavation shall reflect the recommendations contained in the Cultural Resources report preparedfor this Program EIR. A report shall be prepared detailing all findings and recommen- dations and submitted to the Planning Department within 90 days of completing test excavations. BAY VIEW LANDING 55. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, CA Ora-1098 shall be surface collected and subjected to test excavations by a City approved archaeologist to determine site integrity, extent and significance. A report shall be prepared detailing all findings and submitted to the Planning Department within 90 days of completing test excavations. Final Findings and Conditions - CIOSA Page 14 56. Prior to grading for the new park, the project sponsor shall retain a City approved archaeologist to conduct a surface collection and subsurface test excavation of CA- Ora-66 to determine site extent, integrity and significance. A report shall be prepared detailing all findings and submitted to the Planning Department within 90 days of completing test excavations. 57. Prior to grading for the view park, the project sponsor shall retain a City approved archaeologist to place a test unit on top of the knoll on the Bay View Landing site in the area containing shell scatter, to determine if the shell is representative of a subsurface archaeological deposit. A report shall be prepared detailing all findings and submitted to the Planning Department within 90 days of completing the test excavation. NEWPORTER NORTH 58. Prior to the use or development of the open space areas for passive recreational uses, CA-Ora-51 and CA-Ora-518 on the Newporter North site shall be surface collected and subjected to test excavations to determine site extent and significance. A report shall be prepared detailing all findings and submitted to the Planning Department within 90 days of completing test excavations. 59. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall conduct a surface collection of the eastern extension of CA-Ora-100 which would be impacted by grading and/or development of residential uses. The surface collection shall be conducted by a city approved archaeologist. A report shall be prepared detailing all findings of the surface collection and submitted to the Planning Department within 90 days of completing the surface collection. 60. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall conduct a data recovery of program CA-Ora-64 on the Newporter North site. The program shall be conducted by a City approved archaeologist. A report shall be prepared detailing all findings and submitted to the Planning Department within 90 days of completing the data recovery program. 61. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for residential development or any bluff stabilization, a qualified archaeologist shall review grading and drainage plans to determine if there are any indirect or direct impacts to CA Ora-51, 52 and 518. If impacts are identified, test excavations shall be conducted to determine site extent, integrity and significance. A report shall be prepared detailing all findings and submitted to the Planning Department within 90 days of completing test excavations. NEWPORTER KNOLL 62. Prior to any grading or use of the site, the City shall conduct a surface collection of archaeological material present on the top of the hill of the Newporter Knoll, with test units placed on the hill to determine site significance and boundaries. One unit shall be placed in the recorded area of CA-Ora-50 to determine if a portion of the Final Findings and Conditions - C[OSA Page 15 site still exists. A report shall be prepared detailing all findings and submitted to the Planning Department within 90 days of completing surface collection test excavation. BLOCK goo 63. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a qualified City approved archaeologist shall conduct a surface collection of CA-Ora-136 on the Block 800 site and subject the site to test excavations to determine site extent and significance. A test unit shall also be placed in the northern portions of the parcel to determine if a sub -surface midden is under the asphalt and trash. A report shall be prepared detailing all findings and submitted to the Planning Department within 90 days of completing test excavations. CORPORATE PLAZA WEST 64. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a City approved qualified archaeologist shall dig post holes in the areas containing surface shell on the Corporate Plaza West site to determine if the shell represents sub -surface archaeological deposits. A report shall be prepared detailing all findings and submitted to the Planning Department within 90 days of completing sub -surface testing. 65. Prior to the issuance of grading permit, the surface near the southern section of the property shall be examined by a City approved qualified archaeologist after removal of brush and prior to any ground disturbance. A report shall be prepared detailing all findings and submitted to the Planning Department within 90 days of completing the surface examination. FREEWAY RESERVATION 66. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for the northern development area (Lot 2), a City approved qualified archaeologist shall examine the surface of areas previously identified as CA-Ora-216. The examination shall be conducted after removal of brush but prior to grading. A report shall be prepared detailing all findings and submitted to the Planning Department within 90 days of completing the surface examination. Paleontology 67. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a collection plan shall be prepared and implemented by a City approved, qualified paleontological monitor for known exposed fossil localities on Bay View Landing, Newporter North, and Upper Castaways. Because of the small nature of some fossils present in these rock units, matrix samples shall be collected for processing through fine mesh screens. The collection plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. 68. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall make provisions for the preparation and curation of all fossils possibly recovered from the sites during Final Findings and Conditions. QOSA Page 16 grading. This shall be done in a manner approved by the City's Planning Depart- ment. 69. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify a repository approved by the City's Planning Department which shall receive all fossils collected from the sites. 70. Cliff faces along Upper Newport Bay that have served as a reference section for micro -paleontological studies should be protected from alteration. If bluffs along Newport Bay need to be altered for bluff stabilization purposes, detailed measured sections and samples shall be made before and after alteration. Samples shall be prepared and analyzed as part of these efforts. The City of Newport Beach shall be responsible for retaining a qualified paleontologist to conduct the comparative study and sampling. A report shall be submitted to the Planning Department within 90 days. Law Enforcement 71. The project proponent shall work in conjunction with the City of Newport Beach Police Department to ensure that crime prevention features are included in building design and construction. The City of Newport Beach Police Department shall review all site plans and access plans. Water 72. Prior to issuance of grading permits for the development sites, the applicant shall be responsible for preparation of a Master Plan of Utilities. • The Master Plan of Utilities will determine any necessary expansion of facilities and/or any modifica- tions, upgrades or extensions to the existing water systems resulting from this project. All necessary expansions of facilities and/or upgrades or extensions of existing water systems needed as a result of the project will be the responsibility of the developer, unless current district or City policies dictate otherwise. The plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Wastewater 73. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the developer will provide a Master Plan of Utilities facilities for the on -site development in order to determine the exact necessary modifications or extensions to the existing sewer systems, if needed. All necessary expansions of facilities and/or upgrades or extensions of existing water systems needed as a result of the project will be the responsibility of the developer, unless current district or City policies dictate otherwise. The Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Final Findings and Conditions - CIOSA Page 17 B. Development Agreement No. 6 Findings: 1. That the Development Agreement is in compliance with California Government Code Section 65864 et seq. and Newport Beach Municipal Code Chapter 15.45. 2. That adoption of the Development Agreement would not preclude the City from conducting future discretionary reviews in connection with the project, nor would it prevent the City from imposing conditions or requirements to mitigate significant impacts identified in such reviews provided that the measures do not render the project infeasible. Condition: 1. Once every 12 months from the date of execution of the Development Agreement, the project proponent or his successor in interest shall prepare and submit for review by the City Council a report demonstrating compliance with the terms of the Agreement, as required by Section 15.45.070 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. C. Traffic Stud No. o. 82 Fin in 1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the morning and afternoon peak hour traffic and circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City Council Policy S-1. 2. That the project is a comprehensive phased land use development and circulation system improvement plan with construction of all phases not anticipated to be completed within 60 months of project approval. 3. That the project is the subject of a development agreement which requires the construction of major improvements early in the development program. 4. That the Land Use and Circulation Elements of the Newport Beach General Plan are not made inconsistent by the impact of traffic generated by the project in that the project proposed eliminates certain planned and anticipated development through the dedication of certain sites for permanent open space, and the other development sites are to be developed consistent with or less than that allowed by the General Plan. 5. That an unsatisfactory level of service will not be caused or made worse at any intersection for which there is an identified improvement. Final Findings and conditions - QOSA Page 18 6. That the benefits to the circulation system resulting from the major improvements substantially outweigh the increased traffic at impacted but unimproved intersections. 7. That there is an overall reduction in ICU at impacted intersections, taking into account peak hour traffic volumes at those intersections, and that the reduction is caused by the improvements associated with the project. Conditions: 1. That the Irvine Company shall make available to the City the monies specified for circulation system improvements consistent with the provisions of Development Agreement No. 6. 2. That the City of Newport Beach shall utilize the monies provided by The Irvine Company to construct in as timely manner as possible major circulation system improvements. These improvements shall be designed to insure that the anticipated overall improvement in ICU anticipated in the traffic study is achieved. D. Amendment No. 763 Adopt Resolution No. recommending City Council approval of Amendment No. 763. E. Amendment No. 764 Adopt Resolution No. recommending City Council approval of Amendment No. 764. F. Amendment No. 765 Adopt Resolution 'No. _recommending City Council approval of Amendment No. 765. G. Amendment No. 766 Adopt Resolution No. recommending City Council approval of Amendment No. 766. H. Amendment No. 767 Adopt Resolution No. recommending City Council approval of Amendment No. 767. Final Findings and Conditions - CIOSA Page 19 Adopt Resolution No., 768. Ml�:�'T�iT.[��rlSa recommending City Council approval of Amendment No. Adopt Resolution No. recommending City Council approval of Amendment No. 769. K. Amendment No. 770 Adopt Resolution No. recommending City Council approval of Amendment No. 770. F.\... \JOHN-D\CIOSA\FIWJ-F&C February 27, 1996 PLANNING PLAN -CHECK CORRECTIONS PLAN CHECK NO.37G-96 875 SAN CLEMENTE MITIGATION MEASURES - CIOSA AGREEMENT Measure No. 10 Street and security lighting. Submit lighting plan to be reviewed by the Public Works and Planning Departments. HOLD ON FINAL Measure No 11 Landscape Plan to Planning, Public Works and General Services. HOLD ON FINAL. Measure No. 12 Acoustical Analysis to Planning Department. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF GRADING AND BUILDING PERMITS. Measure No. 13 Same as above Measure No. 14 Need to include acoustical barriers on Grading Plan. Measure No. 51-53 An archeologist and paleontologist must submit a letter to the Planning Department confirming presence on the site during grading activities. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF GRADING AND BUILDING PERMITS Measure No. 71 Approval of Police Department of all site plans and access plans. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS NOTE: No further revisions to the Rough Grading can be issued until a letter is received from the archeologist/paleontologist showing compliance with Mitigation Measures and Condition No. 31 of Tentative Tract Map No. 15178. Genia Garcia Associate Planner 7® V4716 �We� W., INTERIOR NOISE ANALYSIS FOR THE BLOCK 800 APARTMENTS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Report" May 2, 1996 Prepared for. IRVINE APARTMENT COMMUNITIES 550 Newport Center Drive - Suite 300 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Prepared by Paul Dunholter, P.E., Principal. Theodore Lindberg, INCE MESTRE GREVE ASSOCIATES 280 Newport Center Drive Suite 230 Newport Beach, CA 92660-7528 (714) 760-0891 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS INTERIOR NOISE ANALYSIS FOR BLOCK 800 APARTMENTS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Analysis shows that the worst case noise exposure to the units facing Santa Barbara Drive is 64.4 dB CNEL, for the units facing San Clemente Drive it will be 62.1 dB CNEL. In order to meet the interior noise standard, the units must provide at least 19.4 dB of exterior -to -interior noise reduction. The worst case rooms used for analysis were the Plan 3 bedroom #1, the Plan 4 bedroom #2, and the Plan 5 living room. With the construction details listed above, the interior noise level inside the three rooms analyzed will not exceed the interior noise standard Refer to the Appendix for the calculation of the EWNR values for each of the rooms used in the analysis. All the buildings in the project will meet the interior noise standard of 45 dB CNEL without upgrades, assuming windows are closed. In order to assume that windows can remain closed, adequate ventilation with windows closed must be provided as per the Uniform Building Code. The system must supply two air changes per hour to each habitableroom including 20% fresh make-up air obtaineddirectly from the outside. This can be achieved with a mechanical ventilation system to provide fresh air. If a mechanical ventilation system is used, then the fresh air inlet duct shall be of sound attenuating construction and shall consist of a minimum often (10) feet of straight or curved duct, or six (6) feet plus one sharp 90 degree bend. Air conditioning and mechanical ventilation systems are often adequate as long as the system meets the requirements of the UBC. INTERIOR NOISE ANALYSIS FOR THE BLOCK 800 APARTMENTS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 1.0 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to demonstrate the compliance of The Block 800 Apartments with the City of Newport Beach interior noise standards. This report is the interior analysis to the "Preliminary Noise Analysis for The Block 800 Apartments - City of Newport Beach", report #95-65 prepared by Mestre Greve Associates and dated April 6, 1995. This report will address the interior noise exposure of the proposed living units based upon the exterior noise levels calculated in the aforementioned report. This report does not include a review of, or specifications of, common party wall or floor ceiling assemblies. This report only addresses City of Newport Beach interior noise standards due to roadway noise. 2.0 NOISE CRITERIA The exterior and interior noise standards for the City of Newport Beach are 65 dB CNEL and 45 dB CNEL, respectively. Analysis shows that the worst case noise exposure to the units facing Santa Barbara Drive is 64.4 dB CNEL, for the units facing San Clemente Drive it will be 62.1 dB CNEL. In order to meet the interior noise standard, the units must provide at least 19.4 dB of exterior -to -interior noise reduction. 3.0 INTERIOR NOISE MITIGATION The proposed project must comply with the interior noise standard of 45 dB CNEL. To comply with the interior noise standard, the buildings must provide sufficient outdoor to indoor noise attenuation to reduce the noise to acceptable levels. The outdoor to indoor noise reduction characteristics of a building are determined by combining the transmission loss of each of the building elements. Each unique building element has a characteristic transmission loss. For residential units, the critical building elements are the roof, walls, windows, doors, attic configuration and insulation. The total noise reduction achieved is dependent on the transmission loss of each element and the area of that element in relation to the total surface area of the room. Room absorption is the final factor used in determining the total noise reduction. For the proposed project, the projected worst case unmitigated noise level at the nearest building face to any adjacent roadway is expected to be 64.4 dB CNEL. To meet the interiornoise standard of 45, dB CNEL, the buildings must provide a minimum outdoor to indoor noise attenuation of 19.4 dB. When residential building attenuation requirements are greater than 20 dB, detailed engineering calculations are necessary to demonstrate the noise reduction characteristics of the building partitions. The following are constructions details which were used to determine the outdoor to indoor noise reduction of the living units: Roofs are double joist construction and incorporate concrete tiles on the exterior and gypsum drywall on the interior surface. Joist spaces are insulated, and roofs are sloped. Exterior walls are wood stud construction with 718" stucco on the exteriorand518" gypsum drywall on the interior. All exterior walls include insulation in the stud cavities. Windows were assumed to be double -strength glass, about 3116" thick with an EWNR rating of 22 (STC = 24). Most windows are operable. Standardsliding glass doors consist of 3116" single glazed glass. All exterior doors are solid core and include weather-stripping. In order to assess compliance of the project with the 45 dB CNEL interior noise standard, a worst case room for each building plan was selected for analysis. In general, the worst case room is the second story corner room with the greatest amount of window area. Corner rooms have more exterior surface area which allows for greater noise intrusion. Rooms with large window area have the least amount of noise reduction, because windows typically are acoustically the weakest part of the structure. Based on the construction details and the Equivalent Wall Noise Rating (EWNR) values, the total building noise reduction was calculated The worst case rooms used for analysis were the Plan 3 bedroom #1, the Plan 4 bedroom #2, and the Plan 5 living room. With the construction details listed above, the interior noise level inside the three rooms analyzed were calculated to be 42 dB, 42 dB, and 41.6 dB CNEL, respectively. Refer to the Appendix for the calculation of the EWNR values for each of the rooms used in the analysis. Therefore, all the buildings in the project will meet the interior noise standard of 45 dB CNEL without building upgrades, assuming windows are closed. In order to assume that windows can remain closed, adequate ventilation with windows closed must be provided as per the Uniform Building Code. The system must supply two air changes per hour to each habitable room including 20% fresh make-up air obtained directly from the outside. This can be achieved with a mechanical ventilation system to provide fresh air. If a mechanical ventilation system is used, then the fresh air inlet duct shall be of sound attenuating construction and shall consist of a minimum of ten (10) feet of straight or curved duct, or six (6) feet plus one sharp 90 degree bend. Air conditioning and mechanical ventilation systems are often adequate as long as the system meets the requirements of the UBC. C APPENDIX EWNR NOISE REDUCTION CALCULATIONS nth recommended upgrades) CASE 1: Plan 2 - Master Bedroom BUILDING ELEMENT AREA (ft2) EWNR 10(-EWNR/10) Roof 175 34 0.069668755 Wall 177 40 0.0177 Door (sliding) 64 23 0.32075983 TOTAL AREA (ft2) 416 0.408128584 10 Log S/A 0 Total Noise Reduction 24.1 ReducdonRequired: 19.4 InteriorLevel 40.3 dB CASE 2: Plan 3 - Bedroom #1 BUILDING ELEMENT AREA (ft2) EWNR 1O(-EWNR/10) Roof 182 34 0.072455505 Wall 37 40 0.0037 Window (sliding) 15 22 0.094643602 Door (sliding) 48 23 0.240569872 TOTAL AREA (ft2) 282 0.411368979 10 Log S/A 0 Total Noise Reduction 22.4 Reduction Required: 19.4 InteriorLevei 42.0 dB CASE 3: Plan 3 - Bedroom #2 BUILDING ELEMENT AREA (ft2) EWNR 10(-EWNR/10) Roof 149.5 36 0.037552702 Wall 265 40 0.0265 Window (fixed) 40 26 0.100475457 TOTAL AREA (ft2) 454.5 0.164528159 10 Log S/A 0 Total Noise Reduction 28.4 Reduction Required: 19.4 Interior Level 36.0 dB t CASE 4: Plan 4 - Master Bedroom BUILDING ELEMENT AREA (ft2) EWNR 10(-EwxR/10) Roof 206 34 0.082010077 Wall 199.4 40 0.01994 Door (sliding) 64 23 0.32075983 TOTAL AREA (ft2) 469.4 0.422709907 10 Log S/A 0 Total Noise Reduction 24.5 Reduction Required: 19.4 InteriorUvel 39.9 dB CASE 5: Plan 4 - Bedroom #2 BUILDING ELEMENT AREA (ft2) EWNR 10(-EWN 10) Roof 162.5 34 Wall 135 40 Window(sliding) 25 22 Window(fixed) 7.5 26 Door (sliding) 64 23 TOTAL AREA (ft2) 394 10 Log S/A 0 Total Noise Reduction 22.4 Reduction Required:. 19.4 Interior Level CASE 6: Plan-5 - Master Bedroom 0.064692415 0.0135 0.157739336 0.018839148 0.32075983 0.575530729 BUILDINGELEMENT AREA (ft2) EWNR 10(-EWNR/10) Roof 169 34 0.067280112 Wall 191 40 0.0191 Window(fixed) 45 26 0.113034889 TOTAL AREA (ft2) 405 0.199415001 10 Log S/A 0 Total Noise Reduction 27.1 Reduction Required 19.4 Interior level 37.3 dB CASE 7: Plan 5 - Bedroom #2 BUILDING ELEMENT AREA (ft2) EWNR lo(-EwxR/10) Roof 148.5 34 0.059118915 Wall 177.5 40 0.01775 Window(fixed) 45 26 0.113034889 TOTAL AREA (ft2) 371 0.189903804 10 Log S/A 0 Total Noise Reduction 26.9 Reduction Required: 19.4 Interior Level 37.5 dB CASE 8: Plan 5 - Living Room BUILDING ELEMENT AREA (ft2) EWNR 10(-EwNx/10) Roof 357 34 0.14212426 Wall 183.8 40 0.01838 Window(sliding) 60 22 0.378574407 Window(fixed) 67.5 26 0.169552334 Door (sliding) 48 23 0.240569872 TOTAL AREA (ft2) 716.3 0.949200873 10 Log S/A 0 Total Noise Reduction 22.8 Reduction Required: 19.4 Interior Level 41.6 dB r February 13, 1996 PLAN CHECK 037G96 375 SAN CLEMENTE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP #15187 CONDITION DEPT. ACTION 1. Map Recordation Public Works Plans Approval �!J 2. Map Recordation Public Works Plans Approval 3. 4, Improvements Public Works Plans Approval 5. " [{ as 6. Sewers Utilities Plans Approval 7. Water " " 8. Street design Public Works Plans Approval Traffic Engineer 9. Sight distance Traffic Engineer Plans Approval 10. Private drive " " 11. Vehicle Code Police, Public Works Plans Approval 12. Control gate Public Works, Fire Plans Approval 13. Easements Public Works Plans approval 14. Santa Maria Public Works Plans Approval 15. On -site parking Traffic Engineer Plans Approval 16. Roads Public Works Plans Approval 17. Street drainage Public Works " 18. Hydrology/hydraulic " 19. Water fee " W 20. Sewer facilities 21. Sanitation fee 22. Plan Check fee 23. Construction work 24. Underground utilities 25. Fire systems 26. Acoustical Study 27. Mechanical Equipment 28. Screening -equipment 29. Interior noise 30. Water/fire hydrants 31. Archeo/Paleo 32. Edison transformers 33. N/A 34. N/A Public Works, Planning Plans Approval Orange County Sanitation, Letter PRIOR TO ISSUANCE Utilities Dept. OF GRADING PERMITS Public Works Plans Approval Public Works To be paid Public Works Plans Approval Public Works Plans Approval Fire Plans Approval Planning Study required HOLD ON FINAL Planning Study required HOLD ON FINAL Planning Study required HOLD ON FINAL Planning Study required HOLD ON FINAL Fire/Public Works Plans Approval Planning Letter from archeo/paleo PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF PERMITS Public Works Plans Approval qr Planning Commission Meeting April 6. 1995 Agenda Item No. 1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: Tentative Map of Tract No. 15178 (Public Hearing) Request to approve a tentative map involving the subdivision of a single parcel of land into two numbered 'lots for 245 residential condominium units, one numbered lot for clubhouselrecreational purposes, one numbered lot for guard house purposes and two lettered lots for private drive purposes on property located in the Block 800 Planned Community. LOCATION: Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 136/22-23 (Resubdivision No. 612), located at 875 San Clemente Drive, on the southwesterly comer of San Clemente Drive and Santa Barbara Drive, in the Block 800 Planned Community ZONE: P-C APPLICANT: Irvine Apartment Communities, L.P., Newport Beach OWNER: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Application This application involves a request to approve a tentative map involving the subdivision of a single parcel of land into two numbered lots for 245 residential condominium units, one numbered lot for clubhousetrecreational purposes, one numbered lot for guard house purposes and two lettered lots for private drive purposes on property located in the Block 800 Planned Community. Tentative map procedures are set forth in Chapter 19.12 of the Municipal Code. Environmental Significance All significant environmental concerns for the proposed project have been addressed in a previously certified environmental document accepted by the Planning Commission in conjunction with its approval of the Circulation Improvement and Open Space Agreement (CIOSA) and certified by the City Council on August 24, 1992. It is the intention that the City use said EIR No. 148 and Traffic Study No. 82 for the subject project, and further that there are no additional reasonable alternatives or mitigation measures that should be considered in conjunction with said project. A copy of the previously prepared environmental document and traffic study are available in the Planning Department for review. The mitigation measures imposed by EIR No. 148 and Traffic Study No. 82 related to the subject property are attached for the Commission's information. IV To: Planning Commission - 2 Back rg ound At its meeting of August 24, 1992, the City Council accepted EIR No. 148 and Traffic Study No. 82 in conjunction with the approval of the Circulation Improvement and Open Space Agreement. The agreement sets forth a comprehensive program of circulation system funding, open space dedications and land use entitlement. Subiect Pronertv_and Surrounding Land Uses The subject property is presently vacant. To the north, across San Clemente Drive is a vacant lot, the former City library site and the Newport Harbor Art Museum; to the east, across Santa Maria, is the Pacific Mutual office building and related parking; to the south is the Pacific Financial Plaza; and to the west, across Santa Barbara Drive, are the Marriot Hotel and the Newport Beach Country Club. Conformance with the General Plan The Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the subject site for "Multi -Family Residential" uses, which is allocated a maximum of 245 dwelling units. The proposed development is consistent with -this land use designation AnalysLis The proposed subdivision involves a request to subdivide a single parcel of land into two numbered lots for 245 residential condominium units, one numbered lot for clubhouse/recreational purposes, one numbered lot for guard house purposes and two lettered lots for private drive purposes Access to the subdivision will be from San Clemente Drive. The design of the subdivision is consistent with the CIOSA Agreement and the City's subdivision requirements. The proposed residential development will also be required to maintain the development standards provided in the attached Block 800 Planned Community text. The map provides for condominium development, although it is the intention of the Irvine Company to maintain the project as rental apartments. Staff has no objections to the proposed subdivision as submitted. Park Dedication Requirement In accordance with Section 19.50.020 of the Municipal Code, as a condition of approval of a tentative map, the subdivider is required to pay an in -lieu fee for each new dwelling unit to be created in conjunction with the tentative map. The park dedication has been satisfied in conjunction with the Circulation Improvement and Open Space Agreement; therefore, no park dedication fees are required. Specific Findings Section 19.12.020 (D) of the Municipal Code provides that in order to approve a resubdivision, the Planning Commission shall deternune that it is satisfied with the plan of subdivision, that the map is in conformity with the requirements of Title 19, all ordinances of the City and all applicable general and specific plans. Should the Planning Commission wish to approve this application, the findings and conditions of approval set forth in the attached Exhibit "A" are suggested. It To: Planning Commission - 3 In accordance with Section 66474 of the Subdivision Map Act, a legislative body of a city or county shall deny approval of a tentative map, or a parcel map for which a tentative map was not required, if it makes any of the following findings: (a) That the proposed map is not consistent with applicable and general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is not physically suitable for the density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use oly property within the proposed subdivision. It is staffs opinion that none of the above findings may reasonably be made in this case, and therefore no exhibit for denial has been provided. However, the possibility remains that information may be provided at the public hearing which may provide adequate basis for denial of the project should the Planning Commission wish to take such an action. PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICEER, Director Dana O. Aslami Associate Planner Attachments: Exhibit "A' Vicinity Map Final Applicable Mitigation Measures ofEIRNo. 148 Findings and Conditions of Traffic Study No. 82 Excerpt of the Block 800 Planned Community Regulations Tentative Map of Tract No. 15178 Landscape Concept Plan and'Plant Material Schedules Elevations of the Proposed Models P:\WP51\PLANNING\DANA-A\RESUB\TIM15178.DOC V To: Planning Commission - 4 EXHIBIT "A" FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT NO. 15178 Findings: That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City, all applicable general or specific plans, and the Planning Conimission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision. 2. That the proposed subdivision presents no problems from a planning standpoint 3. That the design of the subdivision improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. 4. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 19.08.020 of the Municipal Code and Section 66415 of the Subdivision Map Act. 5. That sidewalk constructed along the Santa Maria street frontage and construction of ramps for the handicapped will improve pedestrian safety. 6. That Final EIR No. 148, previously certified on August 24, 1992, was considered prior to approval of the project, was determined adequate to serve as a Program EIR for this project, and satisfies all requirements of CEQA. The Final EIR reflects the independent judgment of the City Council. That the mitigation monitoring requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 will be met through required compliance with applicable codes, standards, mitigation measures, and conditions of approval adopted in connection with the project. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the project is contained in Final EIR No. 148. That a final map shall be recorded. 'The final map shall be prepared so that the Bearings relate to the State Plane Coordinate System. The final map shall be prepared on the California coordinate system (NAD83) and that prior to recordation of the final map, the surveyor/engineer preparing the map shall submit to the County Surveyor a digital -graphic file of said map in a manner described in Section 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. 2. That prior to recordation of the final map, the surveyor/engineer preparing the map shall tie the boundary of the map into the Horizontal Control System established by the County Surveyor in a manner described in Sections 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. r To: Planning Commission - 5 Monuments (one inch iron pipe with tag) shall be set On Each Lot Corner unless otherwise approved by the Subdivision Engineer. Monuments shall be protected in place if installed prior to completion of construction project. 4. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. That a standard subdivision agreement and accompanying surety be provided in order to guarantee satisfactory completion of the public improvements if it is desired to record a tract map or obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public improvements 6. That each of the proposed 4 story buildings shall have one sewer lateral serving the first floor and one sewer lateral serving the second, third and fourth floors, as approved by the Utilities Department. These two sewer laterals shall be connected within the building garages before connecting to the public sewer system, unless otherwise approved by the Utilities Department. That the townhouse units not located within the four-story structures, shall be sewered with separate lateral connections to the City sewer unless otherwise approved by the Utilities Department. 7. That each unit shall be served with individual water services. The townhouses located within the four-story structures may use water meter rooms in the parking garage, as approved by the Utilities Department. The townhouses not located in the four-story structures shall be metered separately with their meters located within the street right-of- way, unless otherwise approved by the Utilities Department. Easements shall be dedicated to the City for access to the water meter rooms within the parking garage. 8. That the design of the private streets and drives conform with the City's Private Street Policy (L-4), except as approved by the Public Works Department. The basic private street and drive width shall be a minimum of 32 feet. The location, width, configuration, and concept of the private street and drive systems shall be subject to further review and approval by the City Traffic Engineer. 9. That the intersection of the private drives and San Clemente Drive shall be designed to provide sight distance for a speed of 30 miles per hour. Slopes, landscape, walls and other obstruction shall be considered in the sight distance requirements. Landscaping within the sight line shall not exceed twenty-four inches in height. The sight distance requirement may be modified at non -critical locations, subject to approval of the City Traffic Engineer. The slopes adjacent to Santa Maria and the private drive into the development shall be laid back to provide sight distance in accordance with the City Sight Distance Standard 110-L. 10. That the private drive serving the development be designed to line up with the museum driveway. The design of this intersection shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer. 11. That the California Vehicle Code be enforced on the private streets and drives, and that the delineation acceptable to the Police Department and Public Works Department be provided along the sidelines of the private streets and drives. M To: Planning Commission - 6 12. That if it is desired to have a control gate at the entrance, a turnaround shall be provided prior to the gate. The design of the controlled entrance shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and the Fire Department. 13. That easements for public emergency and security ingress, egress and public utility purposes on all private streets be dedicated to the City and that all easements be shown on the tract map. 14. That Santa Maria shall be improved with curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting and pavement under an encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. 15. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review by the City Traffic Engineer. 16. That asphalt or concrete access roads shall be provided to all public utilities, vaults, manholes, and junction structure locations, with widths to be approved by the Public Works Department. 17. That street, drainage and utility improvements be shown of standard improvement plans prepared by a licensed civil engineer. 18. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared by the applicant and approved by the Public Works Department, along with a master plan of water, sewer and storm drain facilities for the on -site improvements prior to recording of the tract map. Any modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain, water and sewer systems shown to be required by the study shall be the responsibility of the developer. 19. That the Water Capital Improvement fee shall be paid. 20. That prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department and the Planning Department that adequate sewer facilities will be available for the project. Such demonstration shall include verification from the Orange County Sanitation District and the City's Utilities Department. 21. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to issuance of any building permits. 22. That the Public Works Department plan check and inspection fee be paid. 23. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of equipment and materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and local requirements. A traffic control plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. There shall be no construction storage or delivery of materials within the Santa Barbara Drive right-of-way. .yt �r To: Planning Commission - 7 24. That overhead utilities serving the site be undergrounded to the nearest appropriate pole in accordance with Section 19.24.140 of the Municipal Code unless it is determined by the City Engineer that such undergrounding is unreasonable or impractical. 25 That a fire protection system acceptable to the Fire Department be installed by the developer and tested by the Fire Department prior to storage of any combustible materials or start of any structural framing. 26. That prior to the occupancy of any unit, a qualified acoustical engineer, retained by the City at the applicant's expense, shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that the noise level on the project does not exceed 65dB CNEL for outside living areas and the requirements of law for interior spaces. 27. That any rooftop or other mechanical equipment shall be sound attenuated in such a manner as to achieve a maximum sound level of 55 dBa at the property line. 28. That any mechanical equipment and emergency power generators shall be screened from view and noise associated with said installations shall be sound attenuated to acceptable levels in receptor areas. The latter shall be based upon the recommendations of a qualified acoustical engineer, and be approved by the Planning Department. 29. Interior noise levels in the proposed project shall not exceed 45 CNEL in any habitable space. 30. On -site water mains and fire hydrants locations shall be approved by the Fire and Public Works Departments. 31. A qualified archaeologist or paleontologist shall evaluate the site prior to commencement of construction activities, and that all work on the site be done in accordance with the City's Council Policies K-5 and K-6. 32. That any Edison transformers serving the site be located outside the sight distance planes as described in City Standard'l10-L. 33. That all applicable mitigation measures imposed by Environmental Impact Report No. 148 and Conditions of Approval of Traffic Study No. 82 shall be fulfilled. 34. That this tentative tract map shall expire if the map has not been recorded within 3 years of the date of approval, unless an extension is granted by the Planning Commission. tJr - 7. Landscaping Landscaping along streets and at drive entrances from streets shall be designed to provide sight distance per City Standard Drawing 110-L unless otherwise approved by the City Traffic Engineer. Detailed landscaping and irrigation plans, prepared by a - licensed landscape architect or architect, shall be reviewed by the Director of Parks, Beaches and Recreation and the Public Works Department. All landscaping referred to in this paragraph shall be maintained in a neat and orderly fashion. A. Screening. Areas used for parking shall be screened from view or have the view interrupted by landscaping, and/or fencing from access streets, and adjacent properties. Plant materials used for screening purposes shall consist of lineal or grouped masses of shrubs and/or trees. B. Landscaping - Vehicle Separation. All landscaped areas shall be separated from adjacent vehicular areas by a wall or curb, at least six (6) inches higher than the adjacent vehicular area. C. Parking Areas. Trees, equal in number to one (1) per each five (5) surface parking stalls and/or parking stalls located on the upper deck of a parking structure shall be provided in the parking areas on Area One. 8. Loading Areas Street -side loading shall be visually screened from view from access streets and adjacent property. Said screen- ing shall form a complete opaque screen. 9. Refuse Collection Areas A. All outdoor refuse collection areas shall be visu- ally screened from access streets and adjacent property. Said screening, shall form a complete opaque screen. B. No refuse collection area shall be permitted be- tween a frontage street and'the building line. 15 SECTION IV AREA TWO 1. intent The intent in development of Area Two is to permit multi- family residential or seniors oriented multi -family residential uses. A limited amount of commercial support activities related to the operation and use of seniors residential and care facilities is allowed. 2. Permitted Uses A. Apartments B. Condominiums C. Recreation Facilities Ancillary to Residential Uses D. Seniors Oriented Multi -Family Residential Uses. E. Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Uses ancillary to seniors residential uses.1 F. Retail sales and services of a convenience nature ancillary to the operation and use of seniors residential facilities. G. Parking lots, structures and facilities. # Skilled care uses shall be subject to a Use Permit re- viewed and approved by the City of Newport Beach. 13 J 10. Telephone Gas and Electric Service All "on site" gas lines, electrical lines and telephone lines shall be placed underground. Transformer or terminal equipment shall be visually screened from view from streets and adjacent properties. 11. Grading Grading of Area Two shall be conducted and undertaken in a manner both consistent with applicable grading stan- dards and ordinances of the City of Newport Beach and in accordance with a grading plan to be approved by the City Grading Engineer. FA ... \PCTE%T\PCBLK800.892 10 Sa. 3. Density A. The number of dwelling units allowed for standard multi -family residential use shall not exceed 245. B. The allowable number of dwelling units for a se- niors oriented residential use shall be based on a traffic study submitted for review and approval by the City of Newport Beach. Per applicable General Plan policies, seniors residential use may exceed 245 dwelling units based on comparative analysis of peak hour traffic generation of seniors use and standard multi -family residential use on site. 4. Building Height All buildings shall be limited to a maximum of 200 feet above approved pad elevation. 5. Parking Adequate off-street parking shall be provided on Area Two to accommodate the parking needs for the development of Area Two. The intent shall be to eliminate the need for any on -street parking. A minimum of 2 parking spaces shall be provided per non -seniors unit, including one covered space. In addition, guest parking shall be provided within the development at a minimum rate of 0.5 space per unit. Guest parking may be provided on street, in parking bays, or on driveway aprons (minimum 20' in depth), in a manner acceptable to the City Traffic Engineer. Parking standards for senior oriented residential, assistant living and skilled nursing residential, uses ancillary to seniors residential uses, inclusive of employee and guest parking, shall be established subject to a parking study reviewed and approved by the Newport Beach Planning Commission. 6. signs A sign program for Block 800, Area Two, approved by the Irvine Company shall be submitted for review and approved by the Newport Beach Planning Commission. 14 a NEW PORT BEACH COUNTRY CLUB ®PROFESSIONAL/ OFFICE/COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL LAND" USE PLAN BLOCK 800 PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT FASHION ISLAND NOT TO SCALE u4�s0] 3 03/20/96 THE COLONY (BLOCK 800) APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with TTM #15178 Conditions Condition # I Condition TTM 1 That a final map be recorded. The final map shall be prepared so that the Bearings relate to the State Plane Coordinate System. The final map shall be prepared on the Calffomia coordinate system (NAD83) and that prior to recordation of the final map, the surveyor/engineer preparing the map shall submit to the County surveyor a digital - graphic file of said map in a manner described in Section 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18 Status Response In Process Final Map in final check and awaiting City Council action. TTM 2 That prior to recordation of the final map, the Completed surveyor/engineer preparing the map shall tie the boundary of the map into the Horizontal Control System established by the County Surveyorin a manner described in Sections 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18 Final Map in final check and awaiting City Council action. 80000ND.WK4 03/20/96 THE COLONY (BLOCK 800) APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with TTM #15178 Conditions Condition # Condition Status Res onse TTM 3 Monuments (one inch iron pipe with tag) shall Open Item cannot be completed until be set On Each Lot Comer unless otherwise construction is completed. Applicant approved by the Subdivision Engineer. bonded for completion of this item. Monuments shall be protected in place if installed prior to completion of construction project. TTM 4 That all improvements be constructed as Open Item cannot be completed until required by Ordinance and the Public Works construction is completed. Applicant Department. bonded for completion of this item. All improvement plans in plan check. TTM 5 That a standard subdivision agreement and In Process Awaiting required bonding amounts and accompanying surety be provided in order to documents from Public Works Dept. guarantee satisfactory completion of the public improvements if it is desired to record a tract map or obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public improvements. 80000ND.WK4 03/20/96 THE COLONY (BLOCK 800) APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with TTM #15178 Conditions Condition # Condition Status Response TTM 6 That each of the proposed 4 story buildings shall have one sewer lateral serving the first floor and one sewer lateral serving the second, third and fourth floors, as approved by the Utilities Department. These two sewer laterals shall be connected within the building garages before connecting to the pubic sewer system, unless otherwise approved by the Utilities Department. That the townhouse units not located within the four-story structures, shall be sewered with separate lateral connections to the City sewer unless otherwise approved by the Utilities Department. Complete Basic concept for sewering the project approved by Utilities Department. Final plans in plan check. 80000ND.WK4 C1ik7P 17 Condition FV—ff1JVA THE COLONY (BLOCK 800) APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with TTM #15178 Conditions Condition Status Response That each unit shall be served with individual water services. The townhouses located within the four-story structures may use water meter rooms in the parking garage, as approved by the Utilities Department. The townhouses not located in the four-story structures shall be metered separately with their meters located within the street right-of-way, unless otherwise approved by the Utilities Department. Easements shall be dedicated to the City for access to the water meter rooms within the parking garage. TTM 8 That the design of the private streets and drives conform with the City's Private Street Policy (L-4), except as approved by the Public Works Department. The basic private street and drive width shall be a minimum of 32 feet. The location, width, configuration, and concept of the private street and drive systems shall be subject to further review and approval by the City Traffic Engineer. Complete Basic concept for project water system approved by Utilities Department. Final plans in plan check. In Process Improvement and Precise Grade plans either submitted for plan check or still in preparation process. 80000ND.WK4 03/20/96 THE COLONY (BLOCK 800) APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with TTM #15178 Conditions Condition # Condition Status Res onse TTM 9 That the intersection of the private drives In Process Sight distance requirements being and San ClementeDrive shall be designed incorporated in landscape and precise to provide sight distance for a speed of grading plans. 30 miles per hour. Slopes, landscape, walls and other obstruction shall be considered in the sight distance requirements. Landscaping within the sight line shall not exceed twenty-four inches in height. The sight distance requirement may be modified at non -critical locations, subject to approval of the City Traffic Engineer. The slopes adjacent to Santa Maria and the private drive into the development shall be laid back to provide sight distance in accordance with the City Sight Distance Standard 110-L. TTM 10 That the private drive serving the development and the museum driveway be designed to line up. TTM 11 That the California Vehicle Code be enforced on the private streets and drives, and that the delineation acceptable to the Police Department and Public Works Department be provided along the sidelines of the private streets and drives. In Process Applicant civil engineer and The Irvine Company (owners of museum site) are coordinating to make sure entries align. In Process A sign will be provided at the entry informing those who enter that the California Vehicle Code is being enforced. Street improvement plans in plan check. 80000ND.WK4 03/20/96 THE COLONY (BLOCK 800) APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with TTM #15178 Conditions Condition # Condition Status Response TTM 12 That if it is desired to have a control gate at Complete Gate design meets all the required the entrance, a turnaround shall be criteria. The gate design with gate provided prior to the gate. The design of details is included in the precise grading the controlled entrance shall be reviewed plans currently being prepared. and approved by the Public Works Department and the Fire Department. TTM 13 That easements for public emergency and Complete All necessary public easements security ingress, egress and public utility included on tract map. purposes on all private streets be dedicated to the City and that all easements be shown on the tract map. TTM 14 That Santa Maria shall be improved with curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting and pavement. TTM 15 That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review by the City Traffic Engineer for compliance with City standards and policies. lane on Jamboree Road along the project frontage. In Process Santa Maria improvements included in street improvement plans currently in plan check. Improvements will be bonded for. In Process Traffic Engineering dept. has approved parking garage circulation. Also to be reviewed is street improvement plans and precise grading plans. 80000ND.WK4 03/20/96 THE COLONY (BLOCK 800) APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with TTM #15178 Conditions Condition # Condition Status Response TTM 16 That asphalt or concret access roads shall Complete Required access provided to all such be provided to all public utilities, vaults, items. See improvement plans currently manholes, and junction structure locations, in plan check. with widths to be approved by the Public Works Department. TTM 17 That street, drainage and utility Complete All improvement plans prepared by improvements be shown of standard Douglas Bender & Assoc., a licensed improvement plans prepared by a civil engineering firm and in accordance licensed civil engineer. wiry City standards. All plans currently in or will soon be in plan check. TTM 18 That a hydrology and hydraulic study be Complete The hydrology and hydraulic study has prepared by the applicant and approved by been prepared along with the street, the Public Works Department, along with a sewer, water and storm drain plans for master plan of water, sewer and storm drain the project. The study and plans have facilities for the on -site improvements prior been submitted to the Public Works to the recording of the tract map. Any and Utility Departments for plan check. modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain, water and sewer systems shown to be required by the study shall be the responsibility of the developer. TTM 19 That the Water Capital Improvement fee In Process Water Capital Improvement fee to be shall be paid. paid upon issuance of building permits. 80000ND.WK4 03/20/96 THE COLONY (BLOCK 800) APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with TTM #15178 Conditions Condition # Condition Status Response TTM 20 That prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department and the Planning Department that adequate sewer facilities will be available for the project. Such demonstration shall include verification from the Orange County Sanitation District and the City's Utilities Department. TTM 21 That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to issuance of any building permit. TTM 22 That tha Public Works Department plan check fee be paid. In Process Adequate capacity in the County Sanitation District's facilities has been verbally acknowledged. A verification letter is being requested. Sewer improvement plans have been submitted to the City's Utility Department for review. In Process Fees to be paid prior to issuance of building permits. In Process Awaiting plan check fee amount. 80000ND.WK4 03/20/96 THE COLONY (BLOCK 800) APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with TTM #15178 Conditions Condition # Condition Status Res onse TTM 23 Disruption caused by construction work Open Construction traffic will be controlled in along roadways and by movement of accordance with City requirements. No construction vehicles shall be minimized storage will occur in Santa Barbara by proper use of traffic control equipment right-of-way. and flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of equipment and materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and local requirements. A traffic control plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. There shall be no construction storage or delivery of materials within the Santa Barbara Drive right-of-way. TTM 24 That overhead utilities serving the site be NA No overhead utilities on site. undergrounded to the nearest appropriate pole in accordance with Section 19.24.140 of the Municipal Code unless it is determined by the City Engineer that such undergrounding is unreasonable or impractical. TTM 25 That a fire protection system acceptable to In Process The applicant will comply with this the Fire Department be installed by the condition during the construction developer and tested by the Fire Department process. A plan will be submitted to prior to storage of any combustible materials the Fire Marshall for approval. or start of any structural framing 80000ND.WK4 03/20/96 THE COLONY (BLOCK 800) APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with TTM #15178 Conditions Condition # Condition Status Response TTM 26 That prior to the occupancy of any unit, a Open Condition cannot be satisfied until qualified acoustical engineer, retained by buildings are ready for occupancy. the City at the applicant's expense, shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that the noise level on the project does not exceed 65dB CNEL for outside living areas and the requirements of law for interior spaces. TTM 27 That any rooftop or other mechanical Open Any such equipment will be sound equipment shall be sound attenuated in attenuated as required. such a manner as to achieve a maximum sound level of 55 dBa at the property line. TTM 28 That any mechanical equipment and Open Any such equipment will be sound emergency power generators shall be attenuated as required. screened from view and noise associated with said installations shall be sound attenuated to acceptable levels in receptor areas. The latter shall be based upon the recommendations of a qualified acoustical engineer, and be approved by the Planning Department. 80000ND.WK4 03/20/96 THE COLONY (BLOCK 800) APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with TTM #15178 Conditions Condition # Condition Status Response TTM 29 Interior noise levels in the proposed project shall not exceed 45 CNEL in any habitable space. TTM 30 On -site water mains and fire hydrants locations shall be approved by the Fire and Public Works Department. In Process A review of the architectural plans by a qualified acoustical engineer with recommendations will be submitted with the buildings at plan check. In Process Preliminary locations for such items have been reviewed with Fire and Public Works. Water system plans have been submitted for plan check. TTM 31 A qualified archaeologist or paleontologist In Process The site has been evaluated by an shall evaluate the site prior to archaeologist and the report submitted commencement of construction activities, to the City for review. In addition, the and that all work on the site be done in archaeologist will be on site during accordance -with the City's Council Policies grading operations. K-5 and K-6. TTM 32 That any Edison transformers serving the Complete All transformers located outside of site site be located outside the sight distance distance lines. See precise grade planes as described in City Standard 110-L, plans. unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. TTM 33 That all applicable mitigation measures In Process imposed by Environmental Impact Report No. 148 and Conditions of Approval'of Traffic Study No. 82 shall be fulfilled. See attached response to all mitigation measures. 80000ND.WK4 03/20/96 THE COLONY (BLOCK 800) APARTMENT PROJECT Compliance with TTM #15178 Conditions Condition # Condition Status Response TTM 34 That this tentative tract map shall expire Complete if the map has not been recorded within 3 years of the date of approval, unless an extension is granted by the Planning Commission Final map submitted to City for approval. Recordation will occur upon City approval. 80000ND.WK4 30 195 MA eW-•^u� a M Mestro Greve Rvvoeiates TO 7205m P.10/10 . MR'f 04�29PM �RG� Moome Greve A"velares Plcoifiminuy Noise Aswivo enr fcrBlock $00 Apazwen 6 Pap APPENDIX DATA USED TO CALCULATE N019E LEVELS Cmss Road Distance Base Of Dist To Pad Observer Wall Section Blevation To Wa11 Wall observer Elevation Wtht Height Al mg Santa Barbara Drive 1st flocs (fac'ag roadway) 1 154 75 180 75 180 5 0.0 2 165 80 180 85 ISO 5 0.0 3 169 80 ISO 85 ISO 5 0.0 2ndfloor(ba4mw) 1 159 135 198 140 188 5 0.0 AloV San Q=ww Drive 1 154.5 64 ISO 69 18O 5 10.0 M TOTRL P.10 01 39Vd N3QN38 9985985bTLT 0Z:80 966T/TE/90 �`MAY� J 5 0a GPM MBmtr• &eue Awsociates i0 7205550 P.-9/10 Meslre Greve Associates ftlimi=y NOW Assessment for Block SM ApuMea $ WiWwiadowa upon, ih6 bultdiifgouuioorto indoor noise zoduedoarausw 12 dBA. Ihetefoze, the buildings along SantaBsrbataDrivsaad San QoraeateDrrvemuse have cloaabl@windows for units rwtpesrietwing an outdoor noise level �eatcr Was 37 .CNEL Tn order to assume windowo eaa rtmain olosai m achiaYethe tequira! building afranaotloas, adequate va milad" with witu3ows closed moat be providod pet UnilotmBuildhtg Code. The syateta must supply two sir ehan7�t pa Lour to each habitable room including 2096 fresh make-up air obtained dirottly fromtside. This can be st hioved wilt mociutnical ventilatioc w pfresh air ct dull ba of sound attenuatiDg cansttuc8op and shall consist of a uinimum of ten feetof sorcurvcd dots, or six feetplus oat sbarp 90 degeo bent. Air conditioning tttay be an adequate substitute for iriubanical ventilation as long as it meets the V8C (Suction 1205 (c)) requirements NCbs^ v _n *i wi1l be_mquJW for all units of dre>auildines 60 3DVd 0`I tY�3��g�36 �1 2�'M J?jGqq Mestre G^evs faseoeiates TO 72055M P.'8/16 Mvst►e Greve Associates Re1im1my Noise Assessment for Block 300 Apit> � 4 Table 3 FOR FUTURTETRAFFIC CONDITIONS DISTANCE TO 0aL CONTOUR CM ROAMAY UGb2 N4' 70- .65- -60- SANTA BARBARADRIVE Soft Site . 30 (5 140 SAN C$ S� B DBE 1S 33 71 At the Closest points, the buildings are -estimated to be located approximately 69 feet from rlas cenaerlineofSautaamrbamI)dVC,anda0:oatelr6afoergromtbccetiteslineofSanCkm Am Drive. Based on obese dist:mces, [}rc nearest outddoor living areas will experience worst can uMmitipmAtrafft nerige h;vels of approximately 64.6 dB CNEL along Santa Barbara Drive, and 60.7 d C2QEL alvny San Cicmenre Drive. 'The nearest building face heated ad wmt to Santa Barbara Mveis approAr Alely72 feerfrom the centerline of the roadway. Atthis distance, the worst case noise level at the building face will be 64.4 d$ C".NEL. The analysis was based on soft site conditions. 4.0 EXTERIOR NOISE MITIGATION The outdoor living was in the project must eoxaply with the City of Newport Beach's 65 dB CAL ouldvor noise standard. The outdoor living areas in the project are all private firsr, second, third and fourth floor deck areas. The analysis indicates that the outdoor living areas adjaxnt to Santa Barbara I)Tivo, San Clemente Drive and Santa Maria Street will be em9ed. to c�c noise levels of less than 65 0 C'NEL. � outdoor livingarsas is the vroiect. tiretGfore 5.0 INTZRIOR NOISE LEVELS The bu' s s 'scent to the roadwaps will experience worst case traffic noise levels of a y 66`� CNEI. along snits BarbasDrive, and apprv�amacely 62.1 CNF.T, alotag ran �va };n ordato mou:t the pry a�f Newport Scach� 43 CNE[, itttezica noise standard, the buildings adjadonr to the roadways will inqquire m7tximuar outdoor tv irrdoer noise attemuadonsof appipodmatel,Y2I.1 dSA and 17.1 dB.A, respectively. Then noise analysis was based on hard rite eordinatrs. Detailed ea;ioeeriwalculations which demonstrato the noise mductium levels are neeeesary for residential building attenuation requirements of greater ahan 20 0. An indoor noise analysis is required to dewnrinethe treed for building up8rades when detailed architectural plans bowroc available. 80 39Wd a3QNM 998998SPILT ez:8e 966T/TC/98 � y�3bp�96 04 28PM TOnestre Grcve Fssoeiates To fG10*eO'9 P.7/ie Mestre Greve Associates Prelimiaory Noise Assoaament for BlcCk gW ApaMwnts Page 3 The fuwm daily average uaflle Om volumes for Santa Ba*mDrive and San Claaents Dtivc were obtained from Richard EdnMston at the City of Nawpmt Beach Transportation Deparb=t;Apt'114, 1995. The CityprqjecttdAM of 1.4,0W for SantaBarbaaDrive, and ap&oximmdy5,000 W San CWa=TCDttve. Thera was no ADTdamfor Sanm X4da 3U= since this is a very snmli collectm street. A vehicle Speed of 40 milos per hour (mph) was utilised. The caffic distribution estimates are based upon erafilc surveys. and are sansKlctod typicalforartwWsinSouthern C lifarnia. Thetraf&volumaaadspeodudlitedamprosentedin utdo 1. T m tube and traffic distributions udlized are presented is 'Table 2 and is constdend a worst Casa assumption for the roadways. Table 1 FUTURE TRAF71C VOLUME AND SPEED ROADWAY TRAFFIC VOLUMl3 SPEED 3ant0,BarbauaxMV0 14,000 40 San Clemertto Drive 5.000 40 Tble Z RAMC DIETS. VnON PER TTMB OF DAY IN PERCENT OF ADT VEE =TYps 'DAY EVENINU NIGHT Automobile 75.51 12.57 9.34 Mediuzzi Track 1.6 0109 0.19 0.64 0.02 0.08 Using the assumptions presented above, the fuatte noise ltvels wen oo�puted. The tesnits ate reported horein able 3 ate in tutus of distances to the b0. 65, and70 CivsL contours. 'IBC xeprescnt the diswtc<s from the txatalineof the roadway w tha vonmurvalue shown. Note, that the values given in Tole3 do not take into accvuntthe effort of intorvcning topography thatmay affect tho roadway noisa tatpvsac. In addition, equivalent lane distances co the wall and observer are calcttiated per dw FHWAManttal 40 39Vd 9989989PTLT nam 966T/TE/99 0�1a1f'W�-W-64�27PM TAn Mestre Greer• Ansooiates 70 7295550 P.6/j0 d Exhibit 2 Site Plan 90 39tld d3QN38 9989989PTLI 0Z:80 966T/TE/90 PROJECT LOCA71ON I Mestre Grove Assooiabos TO v FASHM ISLAND NEMPORT MACH fk CWH RY CLUB' w 'rectjaon P.5/10 gig GANYM =UMIRY WA I Exhibit Y Vicinity Map 50 39Fid cGCIN38 9989989tTLT 03:80 966T/TE/90 .MRY i ' JC r 94i2tpmlw Mesxre Cie"e Rsaoalates TO •72M,SVe P.4%ib 11Qe51re Grdve Associates Preliminary Noise As%m=nt for Block 800 Apetanents Page x rRELNINARY NOISE ANALYSIS FOR THE, BLOCS{ 800 APARTMENTS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 1.0 INTRODUCTION Thee purpose of this report is to densoastrata cxnVliancoof the Bloch 8t10 Apartments with the seiso- telat ed'Conditions of Appt*vA' placed on the project by the City of Newport Beach. 'Il e pru*tcallsforthe developmentofmulti-familyiesidentislunim ThepngjeaSite islocaoaion thssoutheastooamofsantaBarbarandwaadSan ClettienteDrive, Thevrauutymspisshown in Exhibir 1. The site plan is shown in ErdubitZ. Tho project will be exposed to futurc ti7f is noise mainly from Santa Barbara Drive and San Clenteltte Drive. The project will not be irtgtacred by any train or aircraft noise. This study determines the need for any exterior rtntigatron woasutes to pmvlde adequate protection for dw residential units in the project 2.0 NOISE CRITERIA The Vmdominantrating scale now in use in the Community Noise Equivalent Level (C average noise level based on the A weiphta eotrelatmoverallsound pressurelevelswit) refers to the fact that noise that occurs da occurring at these times. The evettittg time while nighttime (10 PM to 7 AM) noises penaldw vme selected to nfiect peoples sen, California for land use eompatibiiityassessment is qEL). CNEL is a 24 hour time weighted ann9al decibel. A•weighting is a frequenvycorrection that i the frequency of the human eat Timc weighting ing amain sensitivetiute periods is penaliaedfor period (7 Fro to 10 PM) pensuzesnoises by 5 d8 ire pmaliud by to dB. These -time periods and iGvity to noise as a function of activity. The C9 of Newport Beach noise standards requite rhatoutdonr living areas not exceed a noise level of 65 CNBL and that the indoor areas not exceed a noise level of 41 CNELfor residential areas. 3.0 ROADWAY NOISE The noise levels prajmwdin the next section of this repot were computed using the Highway Noise Model publishedthe Fedeal highway Administmdon ("FHWAM way Traffic Noise Prediction Model", FU A-RD-77-109, December 1978), The FHWA Model uses traffic volume, vehicle. mix, vehicle speed, and roadway ge0metty to compute the "equivalent noise level", Acomputeraodehasbeenwrittenwhich computcsequividentnoise levelsforeach ofdc rime pc 'ode used in CNEL. V4i&ing these noise levels and summing them results in the CNEL for the traffic projections used CN1EL contours are found by iterating over many distanees until the distance to 60, 65, and 70 CNEL contours are found. Mittl!gganon throetPb the design end construction of a nvasa barrier (wall harm, or eombioatiott waii�berm) is the taost cotnnton way of allevittdng uaff'ic noise ltttpacts. The effecr of a noise barrieris tsitirany dependent on the georaeay between the noise source andthe fdoeivet A noise barriereffoet ooctlra when the ^line of agCt" betwtxn shesource and roceiveris penetrated by the harries: The greater the penvtrativn the greater the noise zeductivn Tha FHW'A model was also used hest in t:omputeriud fottrat to datermiste bamez helghu V0 39tid d3(IN38 9989989PTLT 0z:80 966T/TE/90 O�MRY 30 l�4 26PM TFZM MRstre Greve Associates TO 72055� p.53i10 Wore Gros Associatsr 1'mhmimry NoiseAsseasment for Block 800 APUtwni$ Page 1 SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES REQUIRED FOR THE BLOCK 900 APARTMENTS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS Theoutdoor living areas in the project must comply with the City of Newport Beach's 65 CNEL outdoor noise standard. The outdoor living areas is the projectare All private Jim second, Hurd and fourth floor deck areas. The analysis indicates thatibe outdom living areas adjacent to Santa BarbamDrive. Sao CkW=%eDdvcand SaaraMaria Sueetwill be exposed w trttiiie aoiselevehj of less than 65 CNEL. Tile MILM lWW9 rues in ft moisce therefom- wit net muire anv outdPwmidgjdort measurtas. INTERIOR NOISE LEVELS The buildings adjacent to the roadways will experience worst case trafft noise levels of p� y 64 4 CNEL along Santa BatbataDrive, and apptoximawly 60.7 CNBL along San anaCl en�Driva In ordertotneettheCity ofNewportlieach's45CNFZ,ntetiortwisestandard, theoe buildings will require maximum outdoor to indoor noise attenuations of approximatrly 19,4 dBA and 15.7 dBA, respectively. Detailed engineering caleuladons which deuronstrate the noise reduction levels arty wessary for residential building aut nue6on requirements of greater than 20 dB: An indoor noise analysis is tequiredtodUWjf etheneedforbutldittgupgradeswhendetailedarclutoatmAlplansbcoome available. With wlndowa open, the buiklingoutdaor toindoor noise reduction falls to 12 dBA. Therefore, the buildings along Santa 13arbaraDnvc and Sari ClemcnteDrive must have closable windows for waits expetiancing an outdoor noise level greater thaw 37 CNEL Jn order to assume windows cu► remain eloaed to achicvt the requital balding attenuations, adequate ventiiarion with windotars closed must ba provided per Uniform Building Coda. The system must supply two air changes per hoar to each habitable t®om irtcludia� 2Q� fresh make-up air obtained divot tly front the outatde. This can be achieved with meehatucal vcnalatiott to Provide fresh idt Tho $esh air rdet due shaA be of sound attaruatiug tonstntcnionand shall consrst of a mudmurn oftenfeesofstraightorowwadduct.orsix feeeplusone sharp 90dagreebeixL Airoonditioning may 6e an adequate subatittrta for rttecttattical ventila6ou as ion$ as it meets the UR C ($ d 1205 (c)) rrquitements. tw.�h ^i *t v nritation im 'lJ hc_reauired for all uni[s ttf the 90 39Wd �13QNM 99899egvTGT ez:80 966T/TE/90 0!MRY 30 '96 04-.26PM•FFV Msstre Grevo AGSClaIEtL TO rind P.2,710 PRELIMINARY NOISE ANALYSIS FOR THE BLOCK 900 APARTMENTS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Report# 95-65 April 6,1995 (Revisal: May 2,199��Q Preyaed For. IRVINZ APARTMENT COMMUNITIES 550 Nowpw Canter Drive, Suite 300 Newpon Beach. CA92W Prepamd By: pawDuwwlwrPE., priaoipal Tya Nguyen Theodore C. I.tn4beic$,1NCE MESTRE CREVE ASSOCIATES 280 Nawpw Comer Drive NcNq= Be % CA 92660.752E (714)76"991 X• a0 39Vd I ZMN3H 9989989PILT 0Z:80 9661/T8/90 DOLIGLAS BENDER AND A�SOC(ATES Consulting Civil Engineers FACSIMILE COVER SHEET JQB IdUhffiER: To: (�51AVAi�CI.GI AT: 2ivv FAIL NUMBER: bZ y - J Z F0 FROM: Alke-i /: ASMS 4 2 FAX NUMBER: (7X4) 586-5866 This transmittal consists of /d total pages. SUBJECT: 37 T.-Ke ti0K� Remy Tom" /1 &15-e Se!5 ""I*V44 6F0 /QT rIv �«orN�-, f'���ls� CAu, bar Gov hWj!5' ,�Oftly 6'vPJiiC nAIU, OeIOPF(CEWAXCO V ER.PRM Tel: (714) 586-0086 Fox: (714) 5W5866 22936 Mill Creek Drive, Suiie A • Laguna Hills. California 92653 TO 39Hd 63QN39 9989989PTLI OZ:80 966T/T6/90 IRVINE APARTMENT COMMUNMES LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: Ms. Gina Garcia City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, CA 92663 FROM: Sarah Chaffin rk for Richard E. Lamprecht RE: The Colony Apartments DATE: February 14, 1996 ENCLOSED IS: A copy of the archological report as per item #63 of the CIOSA agreement. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. AS REQUESTED (X) FOR REVIEW ( ) FOR SIGNATURE (tX) FOR APPROVAL ( ) FOR INFORMATIONXILES ( ) FOR ACTION ( ) Thank you. co/� bG i 550 Newport Center Drive, Suite 300, Newport Beach, California 92660 • V14) 720-5500 • Fax (714) 720-5550 03/20/1996 16:22 1/1 APR 04 '95 01:061'tj IRC ;J + .1 t 1 Y /'• s e x v n • • t I! of t[ <e x I ' at % !'• ' 't �`• ' is � </ J i ' � I/,G//i $1411 -1100(ty I P-C r r.. . 0-5 J" ,Y. .° BENDER PAGE 02 flICINITY MAP /_ ViLlJ °'t F P-C P,5 1 APO., —7 Va. lrekv PC APF-11 nPK.N � a'Piys Y PP H Da RC P-C NG-MAP -CITYOF-NEWPORT-BEACH-C l NHYN:t Y'IItICY .f.V �t� N {'i • J4�M ..rt ..mClr\\ { n... Itt\ OYY ^ -• IOLYI1lL wIM1.lI<Ilftitf/w�urWWM 11.1-yw .. RP.\NW4lf Kr... ✓.W�TJ!'V! ffM .GW.M LLItw tH �. q,IN •TIR IaI•.r..w\. wnw Yr � 'AyfrvN IJ�T 4�if tiT..pl.(w♦♦°� \� �� •nPtN w.� �w\��.^\q:LY:1:�. ttt r/e xo . FORNIA fI�lOH4 1•M�M AAa p Aja '7'v To: Building Department No Activity: In Plan Check: From: Planning Department Active Bldg Permit: Public Works Notified: Re: Hold on Building Permit Final Plan Checker Notified: H®RNE P I Ian Check No. <97S- T101 Planning Department Comments PRIOR TO RELEASE Of Building Permit Final: Park Dedication Fee in the Amount of $ is DUE. Fairshare Fee in the Amount of -$ is DUE. S.J.H.T.C. Fee in the Amount of $ is DUE. Coastal Commission Approval of Resubdivision Must Be Obtained. [ ] Parcel Map Recordation: Resubdivision No. Record date [ ] Use Permit Conditions of Approval: Use Permit No. Condition(s) No. [ ] After recordation of the map a building permit change must be processed with the Building and Planning Departments, PRIOR TO FINAL OF THE BUILDING PERMIT, to change the description of the permit to reflect condominium construction, the fee is nominal and payable at the time of the change. Proof of payment of the above mentioned fees may be required at that time if not collected at issuance of the original building or grading permits. [ Other. Other: Units Demolished Units Built B&-WXdate—*�; Planning Department. CC: _Code Enforcement _Plan Checker F:\WP50\JAY\MEM\BP-HOLD.MEM rev 4-5-90 July 11, 1996 PLAN CHECK NO.37G-96 875 SAN CLEMENTE Total number of units - 245 Building Gross Square Footage - 403,770 Garage Areas Gross Square Footage 284,528 Auxiliary Buildings: Recreation Bldg. 4,362 Pool Bldg. 934 Guardhouse 273 Total Gross Square Footage 693,867 Parking Spaces Required: 2 spaces per unit x 245 units 490 spaces .5 guest space per unit x 245 units 123 spaces Total spaces required 613 Parking Spaces Provided Surplus Spaces 626 13 FAIR SHARE FEE DUE: 245 Dwelling units x $806.00 = SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR FEE: 245 Dwelling units x $1,415.78 = $197,470.00 $346,866.10 July 11, 1996 PLAN CHECK NO.37G-96 875 SAN CLEMENTE Total number of units - 245 Building Gross Square Footage - 403,770 Garage Areas Gross Square Footage 284,528 Auxiliary Buildings: Recreation Bldg. 4,362 Pool Bldg, 934 Guardhouse 273 Total Gross Square Footage 693,867 Parking Spaces Required: 2 spaces per unit x 245 units 490 spaces .5 guest space.per unit x 245 units 123 spaces Total spaces required 613 Parking Spaces Provided Surplus Spaces 626 13 FAIR SHARE FEE DUE: 245 Dwelling units x $806.00 = SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR FEE: 245 Dwelling units x $1,415.78 = $197,470.00 $346,866.10 July 11, 1996 PLAN CHECK NO.37G-96 875 SAN CLEMENTE Total number of units - 245 Building Gross Square Footage - 403,770 Garage Areas Gross Square Footage 284,528 Auxiliary Buildings: Recreation Bldg. 4,362 Pool Bldg. 934 Guardhouse 273 Total Gross Square Footage 693,867 Parking Spaces Required: 2 spaces per unit x 245 units 490 spaces .5 guest space per unit x 245 units 123 spaces Total spaces required 613 -irking Spaces Provided Surplus Spaces 626 13 kIR SHARE FEE DUE: 245 Dwelling units x $806.00 = 'AN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR FEE: 245 Dwelling units x $1,415.78 = $197,470.00 $346,866.10 SHEET 1 OF 3 SHEETS (ALL OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15178) TOTAL ACRES: 6.445 AC. NUMBERED LOTS: 4 LETTERED LOTS: 2 DATE OF SURVEY: OCTOBER 4,1995. BLOCK: MODULE: 5350 23 & 24. TRACT NO. 15178 ACCEPTED AND FILED AT THE REQUEST OF FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY DATE ` IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TIME BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 2, AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP FILED IN BOOK 136, PAGES 22 AND 23 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. DOUGLAS BENDER AND ASSOCIATES DOUGLAS W. BENDER R.C.E. 28946 DECEMBER, 1995. OWNERSHIP STATEMENT: WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, BEING ALL PARTIES HAVING ANY RECORD TITLE INTEREST IN THE LAND COVERED BY THIS MAP, DO HEREBY CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND RECORDATION OF SAID MAP, AS SHOWN WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINE. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH: 1. AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND SECURITY INGRESS AND EGRESS AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES OVER SANTA MARIA STREET AND COLONY PLAZA. 2. AN EASEMENT FOR WATER FACILITY PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP. WE ALSO HEREBY RELEASE AND RELINQUISH TO THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ACCESS RIGHTS TO SANTA BARBARA DRIVE AND SAN CLEMENTE DRIVE, EXCEPT AT APPROVED STREET AND DRIVEWAY INTERSECTIONS. THE IRVINE COMPANY, A MICHIGAN CORPORATION. BP: (Y: �- WILLIAM H. McFARLAND JAMES R. CAVANAU EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT ASSISTANT SECRETARY STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Oil ^' ON THIS I� DAY Of OilL BEFORE ME, SAQ A1� K • v T�F�1� A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE, PERSONALLY APPEARED PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME (OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSON (S) WHOSE NAME (S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY (IES), AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE (S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON (S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON (S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. WITNESS MY HAND: SIGNATURE t NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID WTE IN PJRI II�r,LACE OF BUSINESS IS COUNTY. ENGINEER'S STATEMENT: INSTRUMENT # FEE $ BOOK PAGE GARY L. GRANVILLE COUNTY CLERK —RECORDER BY DEPUTY I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM A REGISTERED ENGINEER OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND THAT THIS MAP CONSISTING OF 3 SHEETS AND THE TRUE AND COMPLETE SURVEY MADE IN OCTOBER, 1995 WHICH IT CORRECTLY REPRESENTS WERE BOTH MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION; THAT THE MONUMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY, (OR WILL OCCUPY) THE POSITIONS INDICATED BY SAID MAP AND THE MONUMENT NOTES NOTED HEREON, AND THAT SAID FESS MONUMENTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. PRPS Wzi- 1 A M. DOUGLAS W. BENDER, R.C.E. 28946 No.28946 a MY REGISTRATION EXPIRES MARCH 31, 1999. Exp. 3/31/99 r� CIVIL Q q OF CAlWFO�/ CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT: I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND HAVE FOUND IT TO BE SUBSTANTIALLY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE TENTATIVE MAP , IF REQUIRED, AS FILED WITH, AMENDED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION; THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND CITY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH AND THE MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT IN ALL RESPECTS NOT CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY SURVEYOR. DATED THIS _DAY OF DONALD L. WEBB JR., R.C.E. 16791 CITY ENGINEER OF NEWPORT BEACH MY REGISTRATION EXPIRES: 6/30/97 CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE )SS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH) 19_ I HEREBY CERTIFY, THAT THIS MAP WAS PRESENTED FOR APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF HELD ON THE -------- OF -------- 19__, AND THAT THEREUPON SAID COUNCIL DID, BY AN ORDER DULY PASSED AND ENTERED, APPROVE SAID MAP. AND DID ACCEPT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH: 1. AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND SECURITY INGRESS AND EGRESS AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES OVER SANTA MARIA STREET AND COLONY PLAZA. 2. AN EASEMENT FOR WATER FACILITY PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP. AND DID ACCEPT ALL VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS TO SANTA BARBARA DRIVE AND SAN CLEMENTE DRIVE, EXCEPT AT APPROVED STREET AND DRIVEWAY INTERSECTIONS. A. AND DID ALSO APPROVE SUBJECT MAP PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66436(a)(3)(A) OF SUBDIVISION MAP ACT. DATED THIS DAY OF 5P& V ONN't F113 CITY CLERK M. HARKLESS } CJ ` MY COMMISSION EXPIRES `))� % CITY CLERK OF NEWPORT BEACH (NAME PRINTED) , 1996. EXAMINED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. S- - - CHkfflti 0 F1A1l;C:�tB'DATED THIS _________ DAY OF ------------ 1996. co mn. a s�= Lf NOTARY QRt L! Olaws Cooly „�a.N/GamnFxores May 15. 199' PATRICIA TEMPLE - EX OFFICIO SECRETARY COUNTY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND HAVE FOUND THAT ALL MAPPING PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH AND I AM SATISFIED SAID MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT. JOHN CANAS COUNTY SURVEYOR COUNTY TREASURER -TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE: STATE OF CALIFORNIA) )SS COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF MY OFFICE THERE ARE NO SIGNATURE OMISSION: LIENS AGAINST THE LAND COVERED BY THIS MAP OR ANY PART THEREOF FOR UNPAID STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, EXCEPT TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES NOT YET PURSUANT TO SECTION 66436 (a) (3) OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THE FOLLOWING PAYABLE. SIGNATURES HAVE BEEN OMITTED: AND DO ALSO CERTIFY TO THE RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY THAT THE PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH REGARDING DEPOSITS TO 1. THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, HOLDER OF AN AVIGATION EASEMENT RECORDED SECURE THE PAYMENT OF TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES ON IN BOOK 6965, PAGE 721 OFFICIAL RECORDS. THE LAND COVERED BY THIS MAP. 2. PACIFIC MUTUAL LIIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, HOLDER OF EASEMENT FOR VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS AND FOR INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES, DATED THIS DAY OF 1996. TOGETHER WITH RIGHT TO DEDICATE SAID EASEMENT AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES PER EASEMENT RECORDED IN BOOK 12567, PAGE 267 OF O.R. JOHN M.W. MOORLACH COUNTY TREASURER -TAX COLLECTOR DEPUTY TREASURER -TAX COLLECTOR 4-- LAW/CRANDALL, INC. ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED APARTMENT PROJECT SANTA BARBARA AND SAN CLEMENTE DRIVES NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: IRVINE APARTMENT COMMUNITIES Newport Beach, California November 2,1995 Project70131-5-0545.0001 i LAW/CRANDALL, INC. ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES November 2, 1995 Mr. Richard Lamprecht Irvine Apartment Communities 550 Newport Center Drive, Suite 300 Newport Beach, California 92660 Subject: Report of Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Apartment Project Newport Center - Block 800 Santa Barbara and San Clemente Drives Newport Beach, California Law/Crandall Project 7013-5-0545.0001 Dear Mr. Lamprecht: We are pleased to submit this report presenting the results of our geotechnical investigation for the proposed apartment project. Our investigation was performed in general accordance with our proposal dated February 17, 1995 as authorized by you. The scope of our investigation was planned with you, and you also furnished us with preliminary information on the project. We were also furnished with project information by Mr. Jeff Larson of McLarend Vasquez Partners and Mr. Douglas Bender of Douglas Bender and Associates. The results of our investigation and recommendations for use in foundation design and earthwork are presented in this report. Please note that you or your representative should submit copies of this report to the appropriate governmental agencies for their review and approval prior to obtaining a building permit. 200 CITADEL DRIVE • LOS ANGELES, CA 90040 (213) 889.5300 - FAX (213) 721.6700 ONE OF THE LAW COMPANIES e II 1 II 11 Irvine Apartment Communities November 2, 1995 Page 2 It has been a pleasure to be of service to you on the project. Please call if you have any questions or require additional information. Respectfully submitted, LAW CRANDALL, INC. %� / Paul R, Schade Senior Engineer 661/50545.RPTMS:kz (4 copies submitted) cc: (2) McLarend Vasquez Partners Attn: Mr. (3) Douglas Bendi Attn: Mr. -do, Barry J. Meyer Chief Engineer REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED APARTMENT PROJECT SANTA BARBARA AND SAN CLEMENTE DRIVES NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: IRVINE APARTMENT COMMU] Newport Beach, California Law/Crandall, Inc. Los Angeles, California November 2,1995 Project 70131-5-0545.0001 Irvine Apartment Communities--Geotechnical Imesugation November 2. 1995 Law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.0001 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................... iii 1.0 SCOPE........................................................................................................................................1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION......................................................................................................... 2 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS...................................................................................................................2 4.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTS ......................................... 3 5.0 SOIL CONDITIONS................................................................................................................... 3 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................. :.............................................................. 4 6.1 FOUNDATIONS........................................................................................................... 4 6.2 SITE COEFFICIENT..................................................................................................... 5 6.3 FLOOR SLAB SUPPORT............................................................................................. 5 6.4 SHORING......................................................................................................................6 6.5 RETAINING WALLS AND WALLS BELOW GRADE ........................................... 11 6.6 SWIMMING POOL..................................................................................................... 12 6.7 PAVING.......................................................................................................................13 6.8 GRADING................................................................................................................... 15 6.9 GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATION.......................................................................... 17 7.0 BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS..................................................................................... 18 FIGURE 1: SITE VICINITY MAP FIGURE 2: PLOT PLAN APPENDIX: EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTS ii ' Irvine Apartment Communities—Geotechnical Investigation November.. 1995 Law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.0001 1 ' SUMMARY ' We have completed our geotechnical investigation of the site of the proposed apartment project at Santa Barbara and San Clemente Drives in Newport Beach, California. Our subsurface ' explorations, engineering analyses, and foundation design recommendations are summarized below. ' We explored the soil conditions by drilling eleven borings at the site. Fill soils were not ' encountered; natural soils, consisting predominately of stiff and dense clayey sand, sandy silt, and silty sand, were encountered to depths of 30 feet in our borings. Bedrock was encountered at ' depths of 5 to 30 feet below the ground surface in our borings, corresponding to Elevations 156 to 161. The bedrock is generally stiff; however, thin layers of softer and saturated material were ' encountered in Borings 2 and 6 near the planned footing elevations. ' The proposed structure can be supported on shallow spread footings established in the undisturbed natural soils or bedrock. If grading is performed as recommended, floor slabs can be supported on ' grade. We anticipate the planned excavations can be made with conventional earthmoving equipment. The on -site soils are suitable for use as compacted fill: The on -site sandy soils should ' be used for the required wall backfill. 1 iii Irvine Apartment Communities—Geofechnical Investigation November Z 1995 Law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.0001 1.0 SCOPE This report provides foundation design information for the proposed apartment project. The location of the site is shown on Figure 1, Site Vicinity Map. The location 'of the proposed apartment project and our exploration borings are shown on Figure 2, Plot Plan. This investigation was authorized to determine the static physical characteristics of the subsurface materials at the site of the proposed apartment project. We were to evaluate the existing soil and ground water conditions at the site, including the corrosion potential of the soils, and develop recommendations for the following: • A feasible foundation system along with the necessary design parameters, including allowable increases for wind or seismic loads; • Seismic site coefficient per the Uniform Building Code; • Estimated settlement due to the expected loadings; • Frictional and passive values for the resistance of lateral forces; • Design of walls below grade and retaining walls; • Subsurface drainage; • Design of shoring, rif required; • Subgrade,preparation and floor slab support; • Design of the swimming pool; • Subgrade preparation and design of asphalt and portland cement concrete paving; and • Grading, including site preparation, excavation and slopes, placing compacted fill, and quality control measures relating to earthwork. ' Our recommendations are based on the results of our field explorations, laboratory tests, and appropriate engineering analyses. The results of the field explorations and laboratory tests, which ' form the basis of our recommendations, are presented in the Appendix. The results of the corrosion study are also presented in the Appendix. ' 1 Irvine Apartment Communities—GeotechnicalInvestigation November?, 1995 law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.0001 Our professional 'services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable geotechnical consultants practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as'to the professional advice included in this report. This report has been prepared for Irvine Apartment Communities and their design consultants to be used sole in the design of the proposed apartment project. The report has not been prepared for use by other parties, and may not contain sufficient information for purposes of other parties or other uses. 2.0 PROJECT Irvine Apartment Communities plans to construct an apartment project at the location shown on Figure 1. The project will consist of three- to four-story apartment buildings over one to two levels of subterranean parking. The apartments will be of Type 5 wood -frame construction. The subterranean parking will be of reinforced concrete design with possible post -tension slabs. The parking will consist of two main structures at the east and west sides of the site, with the entry way between the structures off San Clemente Drive. The one -level subterranean portion will be located near the southeast corner of the site. Finished floor elevations of the parking will be at 156 for the two level parking and 168 for the one -level parking. Excavations ranging from 5 to 32 feet will be required for the lower floor level. A recreation building and swimming pool are planned at the south side of the site between the subterranean parking structures. The building and pool will be supported at -grade. 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS The site is located at Santa Barbara and San Clemente Drives in Newport Beach, California. The site is currently vacant. The existing site grade slopes down to the northwest and varies from Elevations 189 to 152 within the project area. Various underground utilities may cross the site. 2 ' Irvine Apartment Communities—Geotechnical Investigation November 1, 1995 Law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.0001 4.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTS µ, The soil conditions beneath the site were explored by drilling eleven borings to depths of 35 to 55 ' feet below the existing grade at the locations shown on Figure 2. Laboratory tests were performed ' on selected samples obtained from the borings to aid in the classification of the soils and to determine the pertinent engineering properties of the foundation soils. The following tests were performed: ' • Moisture content and dry density determinations • Direct shear ' • Consolidation • Expansion Index • Compaction • Sand equivalent • Corrosivity ' Details of the exploration and laboratory testing program and test results are presented in the Appendix. 5.0 SOIL CONDITIONS ' Fill soils were not encountered in our borings. The natural soils are Pleistocene age terrace deposits generally consisting of dense sand, clayey sand, silty sand, and stiff clay and silt. The terrace deposits are underlain by sedimentary bedrock units of the Tertiary period Monterey ' Formation. Bedrock was encountered at depths of 5 to 30 feet (Elevations 156 to 161) below the existing ground surface in our borings and consists of thinly bedded and fractured siltstone. The I' bedrock is generally stiff to hard; however, softer and saturated layers of about 2 feet in thickness were encountered near the planned footing depths in Borings 2 and 6. Water seepage was encountered in four of our borings. The seepage was encountered at the soil/bedrock contact and at sandy seams and fractures within the siltstone. I a' 3 ' Irvine Apartment Communities--Geotechnical Investigation November 1, 1995 law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.0001 1 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ' The natural soils and bedrock at the site are generally dense and stiff. The proposed buildings can ' be supported on spread footings established in the undisturbed natural materials. Excavations ranging from 5 to 32 feet will be required to achieve the desired floor grade for the parking structures. Most footings for the two subterranean level parking will automatically extend into the bedrock. Footings for the one subterranean level parking and the recreation building will extend ' into the dense and stiff terrace deposits. If the 2- to 3-foot layer of softer and saturated material is encountered at the planned footing depths as it was encountered in Borings 2 and 6, the footings ' should be deepened to the stiff material. If the recommendations on grading are followed, the floor slab can be supported on grade. 6.1 FOUNDATIONS ' Bearing Value Spread footings carried at least 1 foot into the undisturbed natural soils or bedrock and at least 2 ' feet below the lowest adjacent grade or floor level can be designed'to impose a net dead -plus -live load pressure of 6.000 pounds per square foot. The excavations should be deepened as necessary ' to extend into satisfactory material. Footings for the recreation building or for minor structures (minor retaining walls and free- standing walls) that are structurally separate from the buildings can be established in either properly compacted fill soils or undisturbed natural soils. Such footings can be designed to impose ' a net dead -plus -live load pressure of 2,500 pounds per square foot at a depth of 1 %2 feet below the lowest adjacent grade. 1 A one-third increase can be used for wind or seismic loads. The recommended bearing value is a net value, and the weight of concrete in the footings can be taken as 50 pounds per cubic foot; the weight of soil backfill can be neglected when determining the downward loads. ' 4 1 Irvine Apartment Communities—Geotechnical Investigation Navember Z 1995 Law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.0001 Settlement We estimate the total settlement of the proposed apartment and parking structures, supported on spread footings in the manner recommended, will be about I inch. Settlement of the proposed recreation building will be about V4 to %, inch. We can review the anticipated settlements when detailed structural loads are available. Lateral Resistance Lateral loads can be resisted by soil friction and by the passive resistance of the soils. A coefficient of friction of 0.5 can be used between the proposed footings and the floor slab and the supporting soils. The passive resistance of natural soils or properly compacted fill soils can be assumed to be equal to the pressure developed by a fluid with a density of 300 pounds per cubic foot. A one-third increase in the passive value can be used for wind or seismic loads. The frictional resistance and the passive resistance of the soils can be combined without reduction in determining the total lateral resistance. 6.2 SITE COEFFICIENT The site coefficient, S, can be determined as established in the Earthquake Regulations under Section 2333 of the Uniform Building Code, 1994 edition, for seismic design of the proposed building. Based on a review of the local soil and geologic conditions, the site can be classified as Soil Profile S, and the site coefficient (S) can be taken as equal to a value of 1.0, as specified in the code. 6.3 FLOOR SLAB SUPPORT If the subgrade is prepared as recommended in the following section on grading, the building floor slabs can be supported on grade. Construction activities and exposure to the environment can cause deterioration of the prepared subgrade. Therefore, we recommend that our field representative observe the condition of the final 5 Irvine Apartment Communilies—GeotechmcalInvestigation November 2. 1995 Law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.0001 I 1 t Ll subgrade soils immediately, prior to slab -on -grade construction, and, if necessary, perform further density and moisture content tests to determine the suitability of the final prepared subgrade. If vinyl or other moisture -sensitive floor covering is planned, we recommend that the floor slab in those areas be underlain by a capillary break consisting of an impermeable membrane over a 4- inch-thick layer of gravel. A 2-inch-thick layer of coarse sand should be placed between the gravel and the membrane and between the slab and the membrane to decrease the possibility of damage to the membrane and to reduce slab curling. We suggest the following gradation for the gravel: Sieve Size Percent Passing 90 - 100 No. 4 0 - 10 No. 100 0-3 Additionally, low -slump concrete should be used to reduce possible curling of the slab. Care should be taken during the placement of the concrete to prevent displacement of the sand. The concrete slab should be allowed to cure properly before placing vinyl or other moisture -sensitive floor covering. ' 6.4 SHORING General Where there is not sufficient space for sloped embankments, shoring will be required. One method of shoring would consist of steel soldier piles placed in drilled holes, backfilled with concrete, and tied back with earth anchors. Some difficulty should be anticipated in the drilling of the soldier piles and tie -back anchors because of slight caving in the sands. Special techniques and measures may be necessary in some areas to permit the proper installation of the soldier piles and/or tie- back anchors. 11 ' Irvine Apartment Communities—Geofechnical Investigation November 2, 1995 Law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.0001 ' The following information on the design and installation of the shoring is as complete as possible at this time. We can famish any additional required data as the design progresses. Also, we suggest that our firm review the final shoring plans and specifications prior to bidding or ' negotiating with a shoring contractor. ' Lateral Pressures ' For retained soil heights of about 15 feet or less, cantilevered shoring may be used. For design of cantilevered shoring, a triangular distribution of lateral earth pressure may be used. It may be assumed that the retained soils with a level surface behind the cantilevered shoring will exert a lateral pressure equal to that developed by a fluid with a density of 30 pounds per cubic foot. ' For heights of shoring greater than 15 feet, the use of braced or tie -back shoring is recommended. ' For the design of tie -back or braced shoring, we recommend the use of a trapezoidal distribution of earth pressure. The recommended pressure distribution, for the case where the grade is level ' behind the shoring, is illustrated below with the maximum pressure equal to 22H in pounds per square foot, where H is the height of the shoring in feet. (Where a combination of sloped ' embankment and shoring is used, the pressure would be greater and must be determined for each combination.) 1 ' I 02H ' H•HEIGHT OF OAN ' SHORING IN FT. 02H ivs. (P.S.F.) 7 Irvine Apartment Communities—Geotechnical Investigation November 2, 1995 Law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.M01 In addition to the recommended earth pressure, the upper 10 feet of shoring adjacent to the streets should be designed to resist a uniform lateral pressure of 100 pounds per square foot, acting as a result of an assumed 300 pounds per square foot surcharge behind the shoring due to normal street traffic. If the traffic is kept back at least 10 feet from the shoring, the traffic surcharge may be neglected. Design of Soldier Piles For the design of soldier piles spaced at least two diameters on centers, the allowable lateral bearing value (passive value) of the soils below the level of excavation may be assumed to be 600 pounds per square foot at the excavated surface, up to a maximum of 6,000 pounds per square foot. To develop the full lateral value, provisions should be taken to assure firm contact between the soldier piles and the undisturbed soils. The concrete placed in the soldier pile excavations may be a lean -mix concrete. However, the concrete used in that portion of the soldier pile which is below the planned excavated level should be of sufficient strength to adequately transfer the imposed loads to the surrounding soils. Lagging Continuous lagging will be required between the soldier piles. The soldier piles and anchors should he designed for the full anticipated lateral pressure. However, the pressure on the lagging will be less due to arching in the soils. We recommend that the lagging be designed for the recommended earth pressure but limited to a maximum value of 400 pounds per square foot. Anchor Design Tie -back friction anchors may be used to resist lateral loads. For design purposes, it may be assumed that the active wedge adjacent to the shoring is defined by a plane drawn at 35 degrees from the vertical through the bottom of the excavation. The anchors should extend at least 15 feet beyond the potential active wedge and to a greater length if necessary to develop the desired capacities. Irvine Apartment Communities—Geotechnical Investigation November ?. 1995 Law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.0001 1 ' The capacities of anchors should be determined by testing of the initial anchors as outlined in a following section. For design purposes, it may be estimated that drilled friction anchors will ' develop an average friction value of 600 pounds per square foot. Only the frictional resistance developed beyond the active wedge would be effective in resisting lateral loads. If the anchors are spaced at least 6 feet on centers, no reduction in the capacity of the anchors need be considered due to group action. ' Anchor Installation ' The anchors may be installed at angles of 15 to 40 degrees below the horizontal. Caving of the ' anchor holes should be anticipated and provisions made to minimize such caving. Mining (removal of soils from the anchor holes without advancing the drilling auger) of the sandy and gravelly soils could occur and the shoring contractor should take special care to prevent or at least minimize such mining. 1 The anchors should be filled with concrete placed by pumping from the tip out, and the concrete ' should extend from the tip of the anchor to the active wedge. To minimize chances of caving, we suggest that the portion of the anchor shaft within the active wedge be backfilled with sand before ' testing the anchor. This portion of the shaft should be filled tightly and flush with the face of the The backfill be excavation. sand may contain a small amount of cement to allow the sand to ' placed by pumping. ' Anchor Testing Our representative should select at least two of the initial anchors for 24-hour 200% tests and eight ' additional anchors for quick 200% tests. The purpose of the 200% tests is to verify the friction value assumed in design. The anchors should be tested to develop twice the assumed friction value. Where satisfactory tests are not achieved on the initial anchors, the anchor diameter and/or length should be increased until satisfactory test results are obtained. 9 I Irvine Apartment Communities—Geotechnical Investigation November 2, 1995 Law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.0001 The total deflection during 24-hour 200% tests should not exceed 12 inches during loading; the anchor deflection should not exceed 0.75 inch during the 24-hour period, measured after the 200% test load is applied. If the anchor movement after the 200% load has been applied for 12 hours is less than 0.5 inch, and the movement over the previous 4 hours has been less than 0.1 inch, theaest may be terminated. For the quick 200% tests, the 200% test load should be maintained for 30 minutes. The total deflection of the anchor during the 200% quick test should not exceed 12 inches; the deflection after the 200% test load has been applied should not exceed 0.25 inch during the 30-minute period. All of the production anchors should be pretested to at least 150% of the design load; the total deflection during the tests should not exceed 12 inches. The rate of creep under the 150% test should not exceed 0.1 inch over a 15-minute period for the anchor to be approved for the design loading. After a satisfactory test, each production anchor should be locked -off at the design load. The locked -off load should be verified by rechecking the load in the anchor. If the locked -off load varies by more than 10% from the design load, the load should be reset until the anchor is locked - off within 10% of the design -load. The installation of the anchors and the testing of the completed anchors should be observed by our firm. Deflection It is difficult to accurately predict the amount of deflection of a shored embankment. It should be realized, however, that some deflection will occur. We estimate that this deflection could be on the order of 1 inch at the top of the shored embankment. If greater deflection occurs during construction, additional bracing may be necessary to minimize settlement of the adjacent structures and of the utilities in the adjacent streets. If desired to reduce the deflection of the shoring, a greater active pressure could be used in the shoring design. 10 Irvine Apartment Communities--C,eotechnical Investigation November 2. 1995 Law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.0001 Monitoring Some means of monitoring the performance of the shoring system is recommended. The monitoring should consist of periodic surveying of the lateraland vertical locations of the tops of all the soldier piles. We will be pleased to discuss this further with the design consultants and the contractor when the design of the shoring system has been finalized. 6.5 RETAINING WALLS AND WALLS BELOW GRADE Lateral Earth Pressure For design of cantilevered retaining walls, where the surface of the backfill is level, it can be assumed that drained soils will exert a lateral pressure equal to that developed by a fluid with a density of 35 pounds per cubic foot. In addition to the recommended earth pressure, the walls should be designed to resist any applicable surcharges due to storage or traffic loads. Building walls below grade should be designed to resist a trapezoidal distribution of earth pressure plus any surcharges from adjacent loads. The lateral earth pressure on permanent basement walls is shown below with a maximum lateral pressure due to drained soils of 24H in pounds per square foot. where H is the height of the basement wall in feet. The recommended lateral pressures are based on the assumption that a drainage system will be placed at the base of the wall. (P 5 F.) II ' Irvine Apartment Communities—Geolechnical Investigation November Z 1995 Law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.0001 ' In addition to the recommended earth pressure, retaining walls adjacent to areas subject to vehicular traffic should be designed to resist a uniform lateral pressure of 100 pounds per square foot, acting as a result of an assumed 300 pounds per square foot surcharge behind the walls due to normal vehicular traffic. If the traffic is kept back at least 10 feet from the walls, the -traffic ' surcharge can be neglected. ' Drainage ' Retaining walls and walls below grade should be designed to resist hydrostatic pressures or be provided with a drain. The drain could consist of a 4-inch-diameter perforated pipe placed with perforations down at the base of the wall. The pipe should be sloped at least 2 inches in 100 feet ' and should be surrounded by filter gravel. The filter gravel should meet the requirements of Class 2 Permeable Material as defined in the current State of California, Department of Transportation, ' Standard Specifications. If Class 2 Permeable Material is not available, %-inch crushed rock or gravel separated from the on -site soils by an appropriate filter fabric can be used. The crushed ' rock or gravel should have less than 5% passing a No. 200 sieve. ' To provide additional drainage for building walls below grade, we recommend strips of Miradrain 6000 by Mirafi or equivalent be placed against the walls. The strips should be at least 3 feet wide ' and should be placed not more than 6 feet on center along the wall. The strips should extend from the drain pipe at the base of the wall up to within 5 feet of the ground surface. 1 6.6 SWIMMING POOL Excavation ' The proposed swimming pool will require excavation ranging up to about 15 feet in depth. To ' provide support for the pool, additional excavation should be performed to remove all existing fill soils and the natural soils below the bottom of the pool, to allow placement of a 2-foot thick layer of ' filter material. Where the radius between the pool bottom and wall is greater than about 1 foot, the overexcavation, of the natural soils need not extend more than 1 foot beyond the tangent point of the ' 12 L1 Irvine Apartment Communities—Geotechnical Investigation November?, 1995 Law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.0001 radius and the pool bottom. Recommendations for subgrade preparation, the placement of compacted fill, and materials for the fill are presented in a following section on grading. The pool shell should be constructed as soon as possible after completion of the required excavation. Care should be taken to prevent the drying out of the clay soil in the sides and bottom of the excavation. If the soils are allowed to dry out and crack, they will have to be excavated and replaced. Pool Walls and Backfill For design of the pool walls, it may be assumed that drained soils will exert a lateral pressure on an empty pool equal to that developed by a fluid with a density of 50 pounds per cubic foot. The walls should also be designed for any surcharges from adjacent structures such.as diving boards or diving towers. Backfill beneath the bottom of the pool slab, including utility trenches, should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum dry density obtainable by the ASTM designation D1557-91 method of compaction. All other required backfill, including backfill for utility lines to the pool, should be compacted to at least 90%. Flooding of the backfill should not be permitted. Drainage Pressure relief drains should be provided to relieve any excess hydrostatic pressure that may develop beneath the pool when the pool is emptied. Good drainage should be provided around the pool. Deck drains are recommended to minimize infiltration of water into the soils below the pool and adjacent decks and walks. 6.7 PAVING To provide support for paving, the subgrade soils should be prepared as recommended in the following section on grading. Compaction of the subgrade, including trench backfills, to at least 90%, and achieving a firm, hard, and unyielding surface will be important for paving support. The preparation of the paving area subgrade should be done immediately prior to placement of the base 13 I 1"ine Apartment Communities—GeotechnicalInvestigation November Z 1995 Law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.0001 course. Proper drainage of the paved areas should be provided since this will reduce moisture infiltration into the subgrade and increase the life of the paving. The paving thicknesses are based on our observations of the on -site soil conditions. An R-value of 20 was assumed for design. The R-value should be confirmed during grading. Asphalt Concrete Paving The required paving and base thicknesses will depend on the expected wheel loads and volume of traffic (Traffic Index or TI). Assuming that the paving subgrade will consist of the on -site or comparable soils compacted to at least 90% as recommended, the minimum recommended asphalt concrete paving and base course thicknesses are presented in the following table. Asphalt Concrete Paving Thickness Asphalt Base Traffic Concrete Course Traffic Use Index (inches) (inches) Automobile Parking 4 3 4 Light Truck Traffic and Drive 5.5 3 10 Medium to Heavy Truck Traffic 7 4 • 13 The asphalt paving sections were determined using the Orange County flexible pavement design mcthod. We can determine the recommended paving and base course thicknesses for other Traffic Indices if required. Careful inspection is recommended to verify that the recommended thicknesses or greater are achieved, and that proper construction procedures are followed. The base course should conform to requirements of Section 26 of State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (Caltrans), latest edition, or meet the specifications for untreated base as defined in Section 200-2 of the latest edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Green Book). The base course should be compacted to at least 95%. 14 Irvine Apartment Communities—Geoiechnical Investigation November Z 1995 Law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.0001 Portland Cement Concrete Paving The required paving and base thicknesses, as above, will depend on the expected wheel loads, the volume of traffic (Traffic Index, or TI), and on the concrete strength. Assuming that the paving subgrade will consist of the on -site or comparable soils compacted to at least 90% as recommended and assuming an unconfined compressive strength of3,000 pounds per square inch, the minimum recommended Portland cement concrete paving thicknesses are presented in the following table. Portland Cement Concrete Paving Thickness Portland Cement Traffic Concrete Traffic Use Index (inches) Automobile Parking 4 7.5 Light Truck Traffic and Drive 5%s 8.0 Medium to Heavy Truck Traffic 7 8.5 The concrete paving sections were determined using the Portland Cement Association design method. We can determine the recommended paving thicknesses for other Traffic Indices if required. Careful inspection is recommended to verify that the recommended thicknesses or greater are achieved. and that proper construction procedures are followed. 6.8 GRADING All required fill should be uniformly well compacted and observed and tested during placement. The on -site soils can be used in any required fill; however, the on -site clay soils, which are limited in extent, should not be used directly beneath at -grade slabs -on -grade or within wall backfill. Site Preparation After the site is cleared and excavated as recommended, the exposed natural soils should be carefully observed for the removal of all unsuitable deposits. Next, the exposed soils should'be scarified to a depth of 6 inches, brought to near -optimum moisture content, and rolled with heavy 15 Irvine Apartment Communities--CeotechnicalInvestigation November2, 1995 Law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.0001 compaction equipment. At least the upper 6 inches of the exposed soils should be compacted to at least 90% of the maximum dry density obtainable by the ASTM Designation D1557-91 method of compaction. Excavations and Temporary Slopes Where excavations are deeper than about 4 feet, the sides of the excavations should be sloped back. For slopes 12 feet high or less, a 3 %Z foot vertical cut may be made at the toe of the slope if the upper portion of the slope is flattened such that the net inclination from top to toe of slope is 3/,:1. For slopes greater than 12 feet but less than 20 feet, a 3%2 foot vertical cut at the toe could be made but should be benched back at the top of the vertical cut to allow for the remainder of the slope to be at 3/.:1. For slopes higher than 20 feet, a vertical cut should not be made at the toe. Unshored excavations should not extend below a plane drawn at 1%:1 extending downward from adjacent existing footings. We would,be pleased to present data for design of shoring if required. Permanent slopes should not be steeper than 2 : 1 (horizontal to vertical). Adequate drainage should be provided to channel water away from slopes and protection from erosion should be provided. Excavations should be observed by personnel of our firm so that any necessary modifications -based on variations in the soil conditions can be made. All applicable safety requirements and regulations. including OSHA regulations, should be met. Compaction Any required fill should be placed in loose lifts not more than 8 inches thick and compacted. The fill should be compacted to at least 90% of the maximum density obtainable by the ASTM Designation D1557-91 method of compaction. The moisture content of the on -site granular soils at the time of compaction should be brought to within 2% of optimum moisture content. The on -site clavey soils should be brought to between 2% and 4% above optimum moisture content. 16 Irvine Apartment Communities—Geotechnicalbrvestigation November 1995 Law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.0001 Back£ll All required backfill should be mechanically compacted in layers; flooding should not be permitted. Proper compaction of backfill will be necessary to minimize settlement of the backfill and to minimize settlement of overlying slabs and paving. Backfill should be compacted to at least 90% of the maximum dry density obtainable by the ASTM Designation D1557-91 method of compaction. The on -site soils can be used in the compacted backfill with the exception of the on - site clayey soils, which are limited in extent. Some settlement of the backfill should be expected, and any utilities supported therein should be designed to accept differential settlement, particularly at the points of entry to the building. Also, provisions should be made for some settlement of concrete walks supported on backfill. Material for Fill The on -site soils, less any debris or organic matter, can be used in required fills. We recommend the on -site clayey soils not be placed directly beneath at -grade slabs -on -grade or within wall backfill. Cobbles larger than 4 inches in diameter should not be used in the fill. Any required import material should consist of relatively non -expansive soils with an expansion index of less than 35. The imported materials should contain sufficient fines (binder material) so as to be relatively impermeable and result in a stable subgrade when compacted. All proposed import materials should be approved by our personnel prior to being placed at the site. 6.9 GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATION The reworking of the upper soils and the compaction of all required fill should be observed and tested during placement by a representative of our firm. This representative should perform at least the following duties: • Observe the clearing and grubbing operations for proper removal of all unsuitable materials. 17 Irvine Apartment Communities—Geotechnical Investigation Law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.0001 November?, 1995 • Observe the exposed subgrade in areas to receive fill and in areas where excavation has resulted in the desired finished subgrade. The representative should also observe proof -rolling and delineation of areas requiring overexcavation. • Evaluate the suitability of on -site and import soils for fill placement; collect and submit soil samples for required or recommended laboratory testing where necessary. • Observe the fill and backfill for uniformity during placement. • Test backfill for field density and compaction to determine the percentage of compaction achieved during backfill placement. • 'Observe and probe foundation materials to confirm that suitable bearing materials are present at the design foundation depths. ' The governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the project should be notified prior to fl II '1 commencement of grading so that the necessary grading permits can be obtained and arrangements can be made for required inspections. The contractor should be familiar with the inspection requirements of the reviewing agencies. 7.0 BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendations provided in this report are based upon our understanding of the described project information and on our interpretation of the data collected during our current and prior subsurface explorations. We have made our recommendations based upon experience with similar subsurface conditions under similar loading conditions. The recommendations apply to the specific project discussed in this report; therefore, any change in the structure configuration, loads, location. or the site grades should be provided to us so that we can review our conclusions and recommendations and make any necessary modifications. 18 I Irvine Apartment Communities—Geotechnical Investigation November 1995 Law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.0001 The recommendations provided in this report are also based upon the assumption that the necessary geotechnical observations and testing during construction will be performed by representatives of our firm. The field observation services are considered a continuation of the geotechnical investigation and essential to verify that the actual soil conditions are as expected. This also provides for the procedure whereby the client can be advised of unexpected or changed conditions that would require modifications of our original recommendations. In addition, the presence of our representative at the site provides the client with an independent professional .. opinion regarding the geotechnically related construction procedures. If another firm is retained for the geotechnical observation services, our professional responsibility and liability would be limited to the extent that we would not be the geotechnical engineer of record. 19 1 ' Irvine ApartmentCommunities—GeotechnicalInvestigation November ?.1995 Law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.0001 1 1 C' 1 FIGURES I 1 1� ,c 1U) 0 m m d ,E I ' F� Pto�-r Irvine Apartment Communities—Geotechmca( Investigation November 2. 1995 Law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.0001 I1 Irvine Apartment Communities—Geotechnical Investigation November Z 1995 Law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.0001 APPENDIX EXPLORATIONS ' The soil conditions beneath the site were explored by drilling eleven borings at the locations shown on Figure 2. The borings were drilled to depths of 35 to 55 feet below the existing grade using 16-, 18-, and 24-inch-diameter bucket -type drilling equipment. No caving or raveling of the ' boring walls occurred as indicated on the boring logs. t The soils encountered were logged by our field technician, and undisturbed and bulk samples were obtained for laboratory inspection and testing. The logs of the borings are presented on Figures A- l. 1 through A-1.11; the depths at which undisturbed samples were obtained are indicated to the left of the boring logs. The number of blows required to drive the Crandall sampler 12 inches and the hammer weight and drop are indicated on the logs. The soils are classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System described on FigureA-2. iLABORATORY TESTS Laboratory tests were performed on selected samples obtained from the borings to aid in the classification of the soils and to determine their engineering properties. ' The field moisture content and dry density of the soils encountered were determined by performing tests on the undisturbed samples. The results of the tests are shown to the left of the boring logs. Direct shear tests were performed on selected undisturbed samples to determine the strength of the ' soils. The tests were performed at field moisture content and after soaking to near -saturated moisture content and at various surcharge pressures. The yield -point values determined from the direct shear tests are presented on Figure A-3, Direct Shear Test Data. ' Confined consolidation tests were performed on three undisturbed samples to determine the compressibility of the soils. Water was added to one of the samples during the tests to illustrate the ' A-1 ' Irvine Apartment Communities—Geotechnicallnvestigation Law/Crandall Project 70131-5-0545.0001 November 2, 1995 effect of moisture on the compressibility. The results of the tests are presented on Figure A-4, Consolidation Test Data. The optimum moisture content and maximum dry density of the upper soils were determined by performing a compaction test on a sample obtained from Boring 8. The test was performed in accordance with the ASTM Designation D1557-91 method of compaction. The results of the test are presented on Figure A-5, Compaction Test Data. The Expansion Index of the soils was determined by testing one sample in accordance with the Uniform Building Code Standard No. 29-2 method. The results of the test are shown on Figure A-6, Expansion Index Test Data. To determine the sand equivalent of the sandy soils and to aid in classifying the soils, sand equivalent tests were performed on two samples. The results of the tests are present on Figure A-7, San Equivalent Test Data. A soil corrosivity study was performed for us by M.J. Schiff & Associates. The results of this study are presented on Figures A-8.1 through A-8.5. 1 A-2 W }- ~ z �"- W ~� Z z =w } BORING 1 ¢w Ww H� wo Z0 o� Om vg w ' J 0 00 } W 3 a DATE DRILLED: September 5, 1995 LU �' o USED: 62' Diameter Bucket m ai ELEVATION: ' SC TERRACED POSITS IOtmt CLAYEY SAND - fine to medium, dark reddish brown - 160 ' 6.5 123 6 d 5 'v49.5 73 MONTEREY FORMATION IT c for 7^ SILTSTONE - well bedded, moderately weathered, soft to VI 755 moderately hard, reddish brown a '3 24.5 82 8 Light grey Y Interbeds of siliceous Siltstone m 10 � Y L � d ' L) c E 150 18.2 - 9 Highly fractured, well cemented, greyish brown `m Cherty layer v a c m •o t 5 37.6 74 15 Well bedded u O a m d t 145 w o 14.2 93 14 m c > v 20 o c c 43.9 75 5 Thinly bedded, greyish brown and dark reddish brown U u 140 'O a r a 25 143.3 69 11 Some Interbeds of siliceous Siltstone, well cemented ,LL o m ° 135 m x c N 2 d Well cemented, cherry .5 n c `0 a 30 120.8 81 30 Greyish brown W U « 1Q C .2 v 130 a ` N � 6 3 END OF BORING AT 35'. 'o v° O o 2 c 35 NOTE: Water not encountered. No caving. O 0 N t �"' = • Number of blows required to drive the Crandall sampler 12 inches for depths of: = 0' to 25' using a 1600 pound hammer falling 12 inches o Below 25' using a 795 pound hammer falling 12 inches •• Elevations from contours on the reference drawing; see Figure 1. ' LOG OF BORING LAW/CRANDALL, INC. ' FIGURE A-1.1 ° 3 }^ H z W >. x w BORING 2 >`— L �� 03 w O O o 0 } y 3° ii g DATE DRILLED: September 11, 1995 w 2 0 Ma — o a Q EQUIPMENT USED: 18" - Diameter Bucket o m co ELEVATION: 182 180-4 I 1.3 1105 I 10 d 5 4.9 107 1 12 9 175 ] v O m m 10 6.8 111 o � . Y � � x U o E 170 o 5.4 111 m c c o `o .q 15 a W U O d s 165 c 3.8 107 14 m m m � c A o a 20 c o v m ° 17.0 109 14 _ 160 U a _ F � ~ L 25 a 172.8 , I 56 m 155 I o y I i w a $ I : 45.8 72 ^ o u a 30 W U i o v 150 38.5 74 I h � 0 ri 2 35 25.8 80 O n L n � n r h c 145 Z 12 h' 12 19 - fine, light orangeish brown CLAYEY SAND - fine, light brown Layers of fine, clean Sand, orangeish brown SM SILTY SAND - fine, reddish brown SP SAND - fine, light reddish brown SM SILTY SAND - fine, dark reddish brown MONTEREY FORMATION (Tm) SILTSTONE - fractured, jointed, thinly bedded, mottled orangeish brown with black Grey Reddish grey Highly fractured, grey Reddish grey 33 Well cemented, highly fractured, cherty layers for j 40 30.3 10" Highly fractured, grey (CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING FIGURE) LOG OF BORING LAW/CRANDALL, INC. At FIGURE A-1.2a 3 y Z- w r x BORING 2 (Continued) Qw a. N. Z:i �.2 Om V 3 W J w V 0 O`0 y H � ° ° DATE DRILLED: September 11, 1995 w 20, o ° O ° a EQUIPMENT USED: 18" - Diameter Bucket — 0 m to ELEVATION: 182 140 45 55.2' 64 1 30 Moderately hard, reddish grey for END OF BORING AT 45'. 10" NOTE: Slight water seepage encountered at 26' and 38'. No caving. I i I LOG OF BORING LAW/CRANDALL, INC. FIGURE A-1.2b I 1 1 n C h S C w .- w•' } Nw * �w H BORING 3 aZ .. a- I-` N� z* w� o y 3 w Cl 0 O 0- DATE E ie w g ¢ ° Q EQUIPMENT USED: 24 Diameter Bucket O m to ELEVATION: 188 SC TERRACE DEPOSITS (Otm) CLAYEY SAND - fine, some Silt, reddish brown 185 4.2 109 5 w 5 c 10.6 115 4 Dark reddish brown v 180 m m 10 a 8.2 115 14 A y c E SILTY SAND - fine, dark reddish brown SM u 'c 175 o m � N C 4 `a 'M 15 8,7 112 11 a o U w S a o m 170 Sp „ 8.2 109 9 SAND -fine, light orangaish brown A 2 y ..a• � p, U ` 8.2 97 7 • , 165 •` c m � t e 25 N `m 6.7 91 12 N d 160 w o m a 30 MONTEREY FORMATION (Tm) A o 38.3 83 12 1 SILfeSTONE - highly fractured, well bedded, dark orangeish a gray � m N C a m y 155 � c ; 48.3 73 9 0 Thinly bedded, greenish grey M o c 35 L F d 52.9 68 6 Light greenish grey 0 = 150 40 584 66 10 Thinly bedded (CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING FIGURE) LOG OF BORING LAW/CRANDALL, INC. 11 FIGURE A-1.3a z w } — WQ. s3 } ~ Z" o = y` p � f BORING 3 (Continued) Q` F": w� F m� Z 7 �� p y C1; W -J J r o O `0 } �.2 0 DATE DRILLED: September B, 1995 Lu o o c — y EQUIPMENT USED: ; 88 - Diameter Bucket m 145 Clayier, mottled m 45 63.2 1 63 12 Light greenish grey n U 'a c .o v 140 I m t ' m 50 50.3 66 21 111 Highly fractured and jointed, light grey Well cemented � 9 e m w END OF BORING AT 51'. i 2 E NOTE: Water seepage encountered at 36%' and 45'. Water c level measured at a depth of 46' 10 minutes after .2 y completion of drilling. No caving. c C i o a U I U W a$ y D W N r N A D � a o � o N U N U A _ u a m � t D 1 I � m o t m N H C C D D D 9 y U. D U D a I I U O A 7 W N � N p O 3 � O O C t H N O Z LOG OF BORING LAW/CRANDALL, INC. ' -7 3 } � uJ O 2 j rn.t :) H BORING 4 r_ Z Lu�O H W w o 0 0 } H 3 ° ° DATE DRILLED: September 6, 1995 -.1 o ¢ ° O aEQUIPMENT USED: 18" -Diameter Bucket o ccvi ELEVATION: 176 175 1 5 'd m 170 L Ir1 c- v m m 1( = 'Y m u 165 U E c o m N O -r •o ,q 1G a u LL 2 .2 160 m .c N 0 m N N � C N O o > c 2C 0 155 N U u y 'c � � h o y U J `o - 25 'LL e > 150 — 10 L q N r 1 1.8 1 102 1 5 4.9 1 103 1 4 0.2 1 98 1 11 10.7 1 110 1 8 36.6 85 1 I i 8 m r c m n c m ° u y 145 -j 140.4 Iv 30 35.6 i 79 I 12 88 8 v I 0 O C L ,p J O �O o 42.9 79 B in 35 in „ y 140 Z 40 Rootlets CLAYEY SAND - fine, light brown Dark reddish brown SILTY SAND - fine, light brown Light brown Dark reddish brown MONTEREY FORMATION ITmI SILTSTONE - thinly bedded, highly fractured, soft to moderately herd, light greenish grey Mottled greenish gray Dark greenish grey Dark greenish grey to orangeish grey Orangeish grey END OF BORING AT 40'. NOTE: Water not encountered. No caving. LOG OF BORING LAW/CRANDALL, INC. FIGURE A-1.4 2 W w" cri °_ ?_ =);. �w H BORING 5 >= rn� Z tu oy V W=- 0 Q p O a DATE DRILLED: ember w n � ¢:2 ° ¢ EQUIPMENT USED: 18" - Dam ter Bucket ° ❑ m y ELEVATION: 182 SM TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qtml SILTY SAND - fine, light greyish brown 180 4.6 107 4 'm 5 7.7 106 4 Light reddish brown v •`- 175 v 1 9 y L m 8.0 108 1 14 1 Reddish brown 10 � c q N W i c E no —` y 5.9 105 16 Layers of fine, clean Sand, dark reddish brown a u u o i a� r 165 8.0 98 9 IN Light reddish brown Sp SAND - fine, light brown N Y Y 0 O 2 20 <: SILTY SAND - fine, dark reddish brown SM o 160 10.4 113 10 U m " _ _ MONTEREY FORMATION (Tm) c SILTSTONE - poorly bedded, highly fractured, moderately d `y N I hard, light brownish grey t `0 25 i o Z 125.7 68 30 Light grey o A 155 '^ a c N o m v c 1 30.9 71 22 111 Highly fractured, light reddish grey m a 30 m U W 5 d 150 29.4 81 21 Some bedding, light grey a c � m � A `0 3 o c 35 44.0 69 36 Well cemented, highly fractured, light grey for t m F = 10" c 145 Z 40 31.0 82 23 Less fractured, well bedded, thinly bedded, light grey ON FOLLOWING FIGURE) OF BORING LAW/CRANDALL, INC. (CONTINUED LOG lilt FIGURE A-1.5b ' .... } F W, IL 0_ F_ �; Z` oN BORING 6 aw 3 J w W" o 59 `0 0, } H 3: ° °- DATE DRILLED: September 6, 1995 w o'= Q EQUIPMENT USED: 18" - Diameter Bucket o m rn ELEVATION: 186 ' 185 18.5 97 14 d 5 6.0 111 6 t 180 'v c � d 9 `m 11.6 109 15 10 Y m 175 = U c E 1; v ' m = 10 � w E C o 5.8 104 12 8'p 15 w a u u o 170 W L c 9.4 110 11 m � m o ,o >� c 20 c 5 165 v v 4.6 102 8 U U a ;` (7 p N � 1 � � `a L I 25 I rLL c > 160 -, 1 5.1 97 20 In L E N r I O1 y, C I v y c a I44.2 u y r 30 1 66 1 28 m 155 '^ c 25.1 71 30 cc N q a 35 u' 81.3 55 3 0 m 150 Z n ' In � . 40 37.4 78 5 1 - light greyish brown SILTY SAND - fine, dark reddish brown SANDY CLAY - light brown Sp '' SAND - fine, light reddish brown SMSILTY SAND - fine, light dark reddish.brown SAND - fine, light reddish brown Reddish brown MONTEREY FORMATION (Tml SILTSTONE - thinly bedded, highly fractured, soft to moderately hard, light grey Dark greenish grey Clayey Reddish brown to grey _ I Highly fractured, grey (CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING FIGURE) LOG OF BORING LAW/CRANDALL, INC. FIGURE A-1.6a ' w — ' z 0 W ¢ 3 ~} ` z" a. F- = to 0 -- f- BORING 6 (Continued) ¢ Ww yo o5 o� : Lu ' 0 .2 0 a* DATE DRILLED: September 6, 1995 w! 2� =a ¢ EQUIPMENT USED: 18" - D Diameter Bucket 0 m rn ELEVATION: 186 ' 145 Layers of Chart d 45 46.9 74 16 Thinly bedded, greenish grey ' 140 c 7 m a m t 50 30.8 85 18 n 135 1Y v c E m 'm o N 4 37.3 79 10 55 Dark gray O q a END OF BORING AT 55'. W O U O NOTE: Slight water seepage at 53'. No caving. ,O o .c v. o N m N � H � 7 mC o � ❑ C O O N U W N a tu N 7 C yi o ,o c u o •� 10 N N c n o w v n c m o y u � u 9 n " a c I h � `0 3 1 rn c o c a C o d N t F c Z n ' LOG OF BORING LAW/CRANDALL, INC. FIGURE A-1.6b I '0 z �u O Y S u m -' O Lu ' w Cn . _ w n4fz' BORING 7 I-^. >Lu f. H r w� Z 7 00 V W = W= �) c o'° a DRILLED: "2e mber Bucket ,� Q a Q EQUIPMENT USED: 24DATE Diameter o m rn ELEVATION: 185 CL TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qtm) SANDY CLAY - dark reddish brown 5.2 122 16. for 8" SC CLAYEY SAND - fine, dark reddish brown 9„ 180 5 9.8 113 6 c A 'O N t m 175 8.4 112 1 Reddish brown 10 9 m E ° 10 7.4 118 11 N C 0 a m 170 15 SAND - fine, light reddish brown ,..n. SP .0 S m m / c ... lot) 20 2 v 5.2 96 5 5" Light brown -aU n W .... m c � Q N a v m` fA c `0 160 25 6.6 99 15 o _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ MONTEREY FORMATION (Tm) c 2 SILTSTONE - well bedded, highly fractured, soft to moderately hard, brown :6 m 13.5 14 greyish c m u y 155 30 U 0 5 m 33.7 69 22 Highly fractured, greenish grey � C ° 150 35 59.1 21 L =� F W O Z 145 40 32.1 83 - 14 Thinly bedded, light grey ON FOLLOWING FIGURE) OF BORING LAW/CRANDALL, INC. At (CONTINUED LOG ° ^ it }^ ' w _ u)BORING 7 (Continued) a" w- DO Z o° 01 y U3 W w o 00 } y }: 2 DATE DRILLED: September 7, 1995 w 2� x ° O. Q EQUIPMENT USED: 24" - Diameter Bucket o m ' rn ELEVATION: 185 135 50 51.9 1 68 1 22 1 11B&M I Less fractured, light grey END OF BORING AT 50'. NOTE: Slight, water seepage at 37A'. Water level measured at a depth of 48%' 15 minutes after completion of drilling. No caving. LOG OF BOR ' W � } ♦ z o^ W ¢ 3 ~� Z" a. } F^ M BORING 8 ' aw Ww v~io o� �3 J o O`o } �:a DATE DRILLED: September 11, 1995 USED: - Diameter Bucket m ran ELEVATION: 17" ' CL1 TERRACE DEPOSITS IOtm1 16.1 119 12 1 SILTY SAND - fine, dark reddish grey SM 5 10.5 115 7 CLAYEY SAND - fine, reddish brown SC 10 13.0 117 12 M ONTEREY FORMATION ITm1 SILTSTONE - well bedded, moderately fractured, soft to moderately hard, light gray 15 41.5 75 10 Thinly bedded 20 30.4 1 79 1 7 33.7 I 82 I 5 I�7G6tl' I Mottled, reddish brown and grey 25 I s4.b 1 rs I 7 I Some sandstone interbeds, reddish grey 30 42.1 I 71 I 22 I ldS7S7Si I Some well cemented layers, fractured, reddish grey 135.2 I 67 I 25 Weathered, reddish grey x I Layers of Chart, well cemented 35 1--TT- -�u„�� 30 I I END OF BORING AT 40'. for 40 46.9 71 10" NOTE: Water not encountered. No caving. LOG OF BORING LAW/CRANDALL, INC. A& FIGURE A-1.8 ' Z -; w" y. * U,} 0. °_ F--r C; =) H BORING Q V., � Z Lu oy U 3 W -.I 1 uj Lu o � 046 } y � ° a. DATE DRILLED: September 5, 1995 w o s a o'n EQUIPMENT USED: 16" - Diameter Bucket o' m vai ELEVATION: 183 ' 1 80 �O m u 5 <� n a 175 n 10 0 Y C N = U c E u c 170 m u.� o m o o` M 15 La . a O O O 'O W O O v m 165 m = N C O 'A v 20 ¢ _> O Q C O O N U N � H u i _m A g 160 � c a u o F LL d `0 25 m 1 o t m m N w o 155 — c m 0 u a 30 W u O ' a U � c g d N C a 150 .. `6 3 IC o rn e 2 35 a in 0 ~ y 'o Z 145 40 11.9 1 120 1 8 9.5 117 11 11.9 109 6 4.5 100 8• `.' '' 3.4 96 10 1 8.4 112 10 SANDY SILT - reddish brown SAND - fine, reddish brown Light brown SILTY SAND - fine, dark reddish brown SC CLAYEY SAND - fine to medium, dark reddish brown MONTEREY FORMATION 1Tm1 --——— —— — — — — —— 18 4 102 12 SILTSTONE - well bedded, moderately fractured, soft to moderately hard, upper 2 feet highly weathered, dark ! reddish brown 29.1 1 89 1 7 41.3 1 82 1 9 Reddish grey Some Sandstone interbeds (CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING FIGURE) LOG OF BORING LAW/CRANDALL, INC. FIGURE A-1.9a z w 3 w z, Lu a. ' p = tr Z p . BORING 9 (Continued) >= w v uj w = o N� O`o p. >. m o yam— a DATE DRILLED: September 5, 1995 w �a o p Q EQUIPMENT USED: 16" - Diameter Bucket o m m ELEVATION: 183 140 Sandstone interbeds 45 W"'N END OF BORING AT 45'. NOTE: Slight water seepage encountered at 43'. No caving. I 1 LI a } I— �_ �; Z" 01 BORING 10 a. ` p— DATE DRILLED: w g Q EQUIPMENT USED: 18".2 - Diameter Bucket o m w ELEVATION: 184 CL TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qtm) SANDY CLAY - reddish brown 4.7 108 9 180 • SILTY SAND - fine, reddish brown SM d 5 3.9 111 5 'v c m 9 175 m 10 11.7 120 1 5 SANDY SILT - light reddish grey ML m ,o E ° 1p c 170 19.6 105 5 c a o 'q a � 15 i � o 'u u a e 18.9 106 4 d N r c 165 SAND - fine, light brown SP o a• 'v 20 }1 C m w 7.1 101 7 ��• OW 160 .c w 25 SILTY SAND - fine, reddish brown SM 9.2 112 11 0 i ' — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — t� c MONTEREY FORMATION (Tm) SILTSTONE - poorly bedded to massive, soft to moderately c H hard, moderately fractured, light grey _ o d 155 37.6 88 10 G m u a 30 w o A Nm 50.8 76 9 Well bedded, some thin Sandstone interbeds a c N q `o 3 150 35 50.4 73 12 L N H ii 0 2 145 40 42.6 76 12 (CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING FIGURE) LOG OF BORING LAW/CRANDALL, INC. FIGURE A-1.10a C 1 c z W } W z " in 0w H BORING 10 (Continued) Q- a^ Z w� Ow W w y o V o `° o y 32 o- DATE DRILLED: September 6& 7, 1995 w o s� O ° EQUIPMENT USED: 18" - Diameter Bucket o _ m w ELEVATION: 184 Well cemented, hard 150 BORING TERMINATED AT A DEPTH OF 43'1W DUE TO DIFFICULT DRILLING. 6 „ 45 NOTE; Slight water seepage encountered at 43'. Water level measured at a depth of 39' 10 minutes c after completion of drilling. No caving. I w ( 9 L L A 9 C y N d i c E u c O 10 N 15 a I G d q O _ I o U N N L O. G N N � � I H A O T 9 C C O O O O u U A r C y v� I to sp �r N 6t C y i I O y C n � c o m u y w o m t W � m � C a m N q O � O O C L N r u 0 2 LOG OF BORING LAW/CRANDALL, INC. z w x 3 z >- O = y ,; moO ,.- I- BORING 11 �^ >= I'^ L= I=- Na Z H U w 0� p 3—DATE a DRILLED: September 7, 1995 w o ¢ O ° Q EQUIPMENT USED: 18" - Diameter Bucket 0 m m ELEVATION: 185 m I180 T 5 c 6.9 1 117 1 6 i"I ETrZlW. m 175 10 O 'g 8.1 113 10 X m v`o E O Y 'ml N C C 68 109 15 `o q 170 15 a ui 2 'u `Y .r,O 6L m Y 7.8 107 11 e o > ;0 165 20 'c 0 o c � u I " Y u m = , 5.7 102 12 C H Wtj i i N 0 160 25 I � � I Y I 140.7 I 76 12 2 Y 9 d c v s 155 I 30 3 1 10 u 0 m � N I 41.0 77 12 A 3 � o 2 C 150 35 o W 40.3 80 8 1145 1 40 1 Some Clay, light brown Light reddish brown Dark reddish brown Sp SAND - fine, reddish brown ------------------------- MONTEREY FORMATION (Tm) SILTSTONE - well bedded, moderately weathered, moderately fractured, grey Layers of Chart Mottled brown Greenish grey _jt:�M I Greenish grey and reddish brown (CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING FIGURE) LOG OF BORING LAW/CRANDALL, INC. FIGURE A-1.11 a _ ' W °_ z o H BORING 11 (Continued) Q ? ?_ w= en � o.2 U 3 W -1 w 0 O `o > W 3 0 ° DATE DRILLED: September 7, 1995 w �o ¢= o— Q EQUIPMENT USED: 18' - Diameter Bucket o m rn ELEVATION: 185 140 —I- 45 135 4 50 Few Sandstone interbeds, light reddish grey Light reddish brown END OF BORING AT 50'. NOTE: Slight water seepage encountered at 50'. Water level measured at a depth of 48' 10 minutes after completion of drilling. No caving. LOG OF BORING LAW/CRANDALL, INC. ' FIGURE A-1.11b MAJOR DIVISIONS SY OLPS TYPICAL NAMES i OOP O•1•a GIN Well graded Imi greivai-Sarin modules, Inoe or no tries CLEAN G�O�OJ GRAVELS GRAVELS (Lao or no fines) GP Poorly graced gravets or grnN-sano mixtures. rime or no fines (Mons man 50% of nano macron is LARGER dun ire No 4 GRAVELS GM Silty gravels, gravel -sand -silt M=MS COARSE sieve sue) WrrH FINES GRAINED (Appreciable . SOILS amount of tress) GC Clayey grawls, graveksand•aay, mixtures (More man 50% of material is LARGER man •; SW Wait graded sands, gnsvelry sands. Inw or no Ines line No.200 CLEAN SANDS ' i sieve size) SANDS (Ume or no fines) (More than so% : I Sp Poorly graded was Or gr"y Sands. thus or no fines of coarse fraction is •' SMALLER elan tie No 4 SANDS SM Spry sands, safltl•alt mixtures dew size) WITH FINES (App(Kade amount of fines) SO Clayey sands, sand -clay mixtures MIL inorganic silts and very, fine sanos. rook dour, silty or cayay fine sands or clayey silts WIm slight plas0ary CL Inorganio clays of low to medium plasticity, SILTS AND CLAYS (Liquid limit LESS man 50) praveUy Wys. way Gays. silly clays. lean Gays FINE GRAINED SOILS OL Organic silts and organic silty clays of low plasuary (More dun 50% Inorganic silts, MICW4 A or dlalprttadaps or material is SMALLER than MH time way or silty sills• elasbc silts me No.200 sieve $ize) SILTS AND CLAYS (Liquid limit GREATER roan 50)InorganicGays CH I of high plasticity, fat days OH Organic clays of medium m high plasticity. Organic silts HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT Peat and other highly organic soils A INQAP.Y r:l ARRIFICATIONS' Soils possessing characteristics of two graups are designated by WMbinaedns Of grdup Symbols. P A R T I C L E S I Z E L I M I T S SILT OR CLAY SAND GRAVEL I T COBBLES BOULDERS Fine I Medium Coarse I Floe Coarse N0.200 N0. 40 N0. 10 No 4 314 in. 3 in. (12 in.) U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM REFERENCE: The Untied Sol Classification System, Corps of Engineers. U.S. Amy Technical Memorandum No. 3.3S7, Vol. 1, Me=. l9S3. (RaWsed April. 1960). LAW/CRANDALL, I FIGURE A-Z SHEAR STRENGTH in Pounds per Square Foot 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Y 0 0 U.to a rn `m a N D C 7 n° C w 300 N to W fY Q. W 0 4000 S V N 5000 6000 KEY ♦ • Samples tested atfield moisture content Samples tested aftersoaking to a moisture content near saturation —Natural soils Bedrock DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA LAW/CRANDALL,INC. 1@2 • O 1o@s o, ' a@to •�@9 VALUES USED FIGURE A - 3 1 LOAD IN KIPS PER SQUARE FOOT 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 0 1 • Boring 4 at 21' 1 SILTSTONE 0.0. t 1 Boring 3,et 33' SILTSTONE _ \ Z 0.02 \ \ \ \ Ixa U W U 0.03 \ Z m ? C 1 W z 0 0 0.04 G J $ Z 0.05 O m 0 1 0 006 a N 1� m O 0.07 1 NOTE. Water added to sample from Boring 4 after consolidation under a load of 1.8 kips per square foot The other sample tested atfield moisture content. CONSOLIDATION TEST DATA 1 LAW/CRANDALWISIC. FIGURE A - 4.1 09 2 _Z 0.09 W a rn W = o.aE U _Z Z_ Z 0 0.08 H a 0 J O N Z 010 O U 012 0.14 LOAD IN KIPS PER SQUARE FOOT 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 B.0 Boring 6 at 35' SILTSTONE NOTE: CHANGE IN SCALE NOTE: Sample tested atfield moisture content CONSOLIDATION TEST DATA FIGURE A - 4.2 BORING NUMBER AND SAMPLE DEPTH: 9 at V to 13' 0 Y - U ' SOIL TYPE: SANDY SILT m MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY: 121 uj ui p ( Ibs./cu. ft. ) ' OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT: 12 m (%of drywt.) O TEST METHOD: ASTM Designation D1557 - 91 LO m m ,kW Q O O r 10 COMPACTION TEST DATA ' LAW/CRANDALL, INC. A& FIGURE A - 5 BORING NUMBER AND SAMPLE DEPTH: 9 at 0' to 5' SOIL TYPE: SANDY CLAY CONFINING PRESSURE: 144 ( lbs./sq. ft. ) INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT: 8.8 (%of dry wt. ) FINAL MOISTURE CONTENT: 15.3 (%of dry wt. ) DRY DENSITY: 114 (Ibs./cu. ft. ) EXPANSION INDEX: 5 TEST METHOD : Uniform Building Code Standard No. 29 - 2, Expansion Index Test EXPANSION INDEX TEST DATA INC. FIGURE A-6 1 a BORING NUMBER SAMPLE DEPTH: 5 at 5' 6 at 2l' 'AND 0 Y 2 U ' SOIL TYPE: SILTY SAND SAND,, SAND EQUIVALENT: 43 62 ul d m ._ -1 Ln m N W Q O Cp' �i M O r 10 SAND EQUIVALENT TEST DATA 4 ' LAW(CRANDALL, INC. A& FIGURE A-7 M. J. SCHIFF & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Corrosion Engineers - Since 1959 7 October 5, 1995 LAW/CRANDALL, INC. 200 Citadel Drive Los Angeles, California 90040 Attention: W. Brian Skyers II �I Re: 1291 NORTH INDIAN HILL BOULEVARD CLAREMONT. CALIFORNIA 91711-3997 909/626.0967 FAX 9091621.1419 Soil Corrosivity Study Irvine Apartments Newport Beach, California Your #70131-5-0545-0001, NUS&A #95149 ' DITRODUMON ' Laboratory tests have been completed on 3 soil samples we selected from your boring logs for the referenced apartment building project. The purpose of these tests was to determine if the soils may have deleterious effects on underground utilities, hydraulic elevator cylinders, and concrete foundations The scope of this study is limited to a determination of soil corrosivity and general corrosion control recommendations for materials likely to be used for constntctiom If the architects -and/or engineers desire more specific information, designs, specifications, or review of design, we will be happy to work with them as a separate phase of this project. TEST PROCEDURES The electrical resistivity of each sample was measured in a soil box per ASTM G57 in its as -received condition and again after saturation with distilled water. Resistivities are at about their lowest value when the soil is saturated. The pH of the saturated samples was measured. A 5:1 water:soil extract from each sample was chemically analyzed for the major anions and cations. Test results are shown on Table 1. CORROSION ENGINEERING AND INVESTIGATION SERVICES SURVEYS • PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS • INTERFERENCE PROBLEMS . SOIL TESTS • SUPERVISION. INSPECTION AND ADJUSTMENT OF INSTALLATIONS FIGURE A-8.1 LAW/CRANDALL, INC. October 5, 1995 MJS&A #95149 Page 2 SOIL CORROSIVITY A major factor in determining soil corrosivity is electrical resistivity. The electrical resistivity of a soil is a measure of its resistance to the flow of electrical current. Corrosion of buried metal is an t electrochemical process in which the amount of metal loss due to corrosion is directly proportional to the flow of electrical current (DC) from the metal into the soil. Corrosion currents, following Ohm's Law, are inversely proportional to soil resistivity. Lower electrical resistivities result from higher ' moisture and chemical contents and indicate corrosive soil. A correlation between electrical resistivity and corrosivity toward ferrous metals is: ' Soil Resistivity in ohm -centimeters Corrosivity Category ' over 10,000 mildly corrosive 2,000 to 10,000 moderately corrosive 1,000 to 2,000 corrosive 0 to 1,000 severely corrosive ' Other soil characteristics that influence corrosivity towards all metals are pH, chemical content, soil types, aeration, anaerobic conditions, and site drainage. ' Electrical resistivities were in moderately to severely corrosive categories with as -received moisture. When saturated, the resistivities dropped into the corrosive to severely corrosive range Soil pH values varied from 7.0 to 7.2. This range is neutral and is not significant in evaluating corrosivity unless lead or aluminum will be used underground. ' The chemical content of the samples was low and moderate. Chloride is particularly corrosive to ferrous metals, and in the higher concentrations chloride can overcome the corrosion inhibiting effect of ' concrete on reinforcing steel. Tests were not made for sulfide or negative oxidation-reduction (redox) potentials because they would not exist in these aerated samples. This soil is classified as severely corrosive to ferrous metals. 1 • a ' FIGURE A-8.2 1"I 1 LAW/CRAMALL, INC. October 5, 1995 WS&A #95149 Page 3 CORROSION CONTROL The life of buried materials depends on thickness, strength, loads, construction details, soil moisture, etc. in addition to soil corrosivity, and is, therefore, difficult to predict. Of more practical value are corrosion control methods that will increase the life of materials that would be subject to significant corrosion. ' Abrasive blast underground steel utilities and apply a high quality dielectric coating such as extruded polyethylene, a tape coating system hot applied coal tar enamel, or fusion bonded epoxy. 1 1 Bond underground steel pipe with rubber gasketed, mechanical, grooved end, or other nonconductive type joints for electrical continuity. Electrical continuity is necessary for corrosion monitoring and cathodic protection. Electrically insulate each buried steel pipeline from dissimilar metals, cement -mortar coated and concrete encased steel, and above ground steel pipe to prevent dissimilar metal corrosion cells and to facilitate the application of cathodic protection. Apply cathodic protection to steel piping as per NACE International RP-0169-92. Coat hydraulic elevator cylinders as described above. Electrically insulate each cylinder from building metals by installing dielectric material between the piston platen and car, insulating the bolts, and installing an insulated joint in the oil line. Apply cathodic protection 'to hydraulic cylinders as per NACE International RP-0169-92. As an alternative to electrical insulation and cathodic protection, place each cylinder in a plastic casing with a plastic watertight seal at the bottom The elevator oil line should be placed above ground if possible but, if underground, should be protected as described above for steel utilities. Encase cast and ductile iron piping in 8 mil thick low -density polyethylene or 4 mil thick high -density, cross -laminated polyethylene plastic tubes or wraps per AWWA Standard C105 or coat using polyurethane, extruded polyethylene, or hot applied coal tar enamel. However, do not use the low density polyethylene wrap on flange joints or any other sharp -edged items. As an alternative, encase iron piping with cement slurry or concrete at least 3 inches thick surrounding the pipe, using any type of cement. Bond all nonconductive type joints for electrical continuity. Electrically insulate underground 'von pipe from dissimilar metals and above ground iron pipe with insulated joints. If a recirculating hot water system is installed underground, buried hot copper tubing would be subject to corrosion by a thermogalvanic cell. The best corrosion control measure would be to place the hot copper tubing above ground. If buried, encase bare hot copper tubing in impermeable, unstretched, non -shrink insulation with the joints and seams sealed, or encase in plastic pipe to prevent soil contact, or apply cathodic protection. FIGURE A-8.3 11 LAW/CRANDALL, INC. October 5, 1995 NUS&A #95149 Page 4 r 1 We recommend combinations of the following measures sufficient to protect reinforcing steel in concrete'structures and pipe from chloride attack: 1) increased concrete cover, 2) a low water/cement ratio, 3) a corrosion inhibitor, 4) silica fume admixture, 5) fusion bonded epoxy coated rebar, 6) waterproofing or coal tar epoxy coating the concrete exterior, 'n cathodic protection. No special precautions are required for asbestos -cement and plastic piping placed underground from a corrosion viewpoint. Protect any iron valves and fittings with a 4 mil polyethylene wrap per AW WA C105 or as described below for bare steel appurtenances. On any type of pipe, coat bare steel appurtenances such as bolts, joint harnesses, or flexible couplings with a coal tar or elastomer based mastic, coal tar epoxy, moldable sealant, wax tape, or equivalent after assembly. ' Where metallic pipelines sleeves, rubber seals, or reinforcing steel. 1 I� penetrate concrete structures such as building floors or walls, use plastic other dielectric material to prevent pipe contact with the concrete and Any type of cement may be used for concrete structures and pipe in contact with these soils. Protect reinforcing steel with concrete cover at least 2 inches thick if placed against fortes and 3 inches thick if placed against earth. Also a water/cement ratio not exceeding 0.50 is recommended to reduce concrete permeability. Please call if you have any questions. ' Respectfully Submitted, M.J. i [FF & ASSOCIATES, INC. James T. Keegan Enc.: Table I Z:0005.95N95149 Reviewed by: Graham E.C. Bell, Ph.D., P.E. egOPESS/p� N0. CR 01054 Exp. z� FIGURE A-8.4 M. J. SCHIFF & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Corrosion Engineers - Since 1959 1291 NORTH INDIAN HILL BOULEVARD CLAREMONT. CALIFORNIA 91711.3897 909/626.0967 FAX 909/621.1419 Table 1- Laboratory Tests on Soil Samples Page i of i Irvine Apadments, Newport Beach, Calfjornia Your #70131-5-05545-0001, MJS&A #95149 october 4,1995 Sample ED B2 B3 B10 @ 31.5' @ 33.5' @ 17.5' O xP `xM�S Soil Type siltstone siltstone silty sand Resistivity Units as -received ohm -cm 2,500 670 1,650 saturated ohm -cm 1,200 580 1,300 pH 7.1 7.2 7.0 Electrical Conductivity mS/cm 0.12 0.36 0.06 Chemical Analyses Cations calcium Ca'+ mg/kg ND 32 ND magnesium Mgt+ mg/kg ND 10 ND sodium NaI+ mg/kg 202 313 64 Anions carbonate CO3=- mg/kg ND ND ND bicarbonate HCO3I- mg/kg 330 256 122 chloride Cl" mg/kg 21 337 28 sulfate SO,'- mg/kg 133 111 ND Other Tests sulfide Sr' qual na na na Redox my na na na ammonium NH4'* mg/kg na na na nitrate NO3" mg/kg na na na .»....,x.x.xxx vie:x•miroi:`^5 `drew `xi-r :rrm>:`.`R'mr""i :e» »crown.. �>r`x`m;rx.'7't;3i m'^"�..�.'"3^>x»imm >»�` wee- rm Electrical conductivity and chemical analysis are of a 1:5 soil -to -water extract. mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram (parts per million) of dry soil. Redox = oxidation-reduction potential ND = not detected na = not analvzed d0w95k95149.xLz III' 'CORROSION ENGINEERING AND SURVEYS - PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - INTERFERENCE PROBLEMS - SOIL TESTS I 1 INVESTIGATION SERVICES SUPERVISION. INSPECTION AND ADJUSTMENT OF INSTALLATIONS FIGURE A-8.5 03/20/1996 16:22 17145865866 BENDER PAGE 01 DOUGiAS BENDER AND ASSOCIATES Consulting Civil Engineers March 20, 1996 140.222 Mr. Chuck Winsor, Planning Manager Orange County Salutation Districts - FAX 962-5019 P.O. Box 8127, 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Subject: Tract No. 15178, Newport Beach The Colony Apartments, Irvine Apartment Communities Dear Chuck: Per our discussion, the City of Newport Beach has requested that we obtain a verification statement that adequate Sanitation District sewer capacity is available for the subject development. The site is located at the southeast corner of Santa Barbara and San Clemente Drives (see enclosed vicinity map), consists of 245 apartment units, and is 6.445 acres net, 7.702 acres gross. The project's sewer will flow in existing city lines in San Clemente and Santa Barbara Drives north to the County Sanitation District's 18-inch trunk line in Jamboree Road. Based on the District's 1989 Master Plan, the project is classified as a high density residential development at 31.8 dwelling units per acre (245 d.u./.7.702 ac.). Using the high density flow coefficient, the project's sewer flow is 7,945 gal/day/acre x 7.702 acres = 61,192 gal/day. On the basis of the project's sewer flow, we are requesting that you prepare a statement of capacity as required by the City of Newport Beach. Thank you in advance for your response. Please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, Douglas Bender and Associates, Inc. l William T. Klas ezi c: 0Genia Garcia, Planning Dept., City of Newport Beach, FAX 644-3250 /00 Eldon Davidson, Utility Services Manager, City of Newport Beach, FAX 646-5204 Richard Lamprecht, Irvine Apartment Communities, FAX 720-5550 Tel. (714) 586-0086 Fax: (714) 556.5866 22936 Mill Creek Drive, Suite A • Laguna Hills, California 92653 I Gina Garcia City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 Dear Ms. Garcia: ENGINEERING RESOURCE PRESERVATION 1 �iw4i V,.J ✓e OLANNJIG D6PAR"a Cp OF NEWPORT BEAC0 Ai�191�1vI���'�21314�5i6 k This letter is to confirm that Macko, Inc. has a contract with Irvine Apartment Communities for the Sares-Regis Group, Block 800 apartment project. Macko, Inc. will monitor the site for Archaeological and Paleontogical resources. Please call if there are any questions. Sincerely, Tracy Bernay Office Manager 20321 IRVINE AVENUE, SUITE F-2 SPECIALISTS IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL, HISTORICAL, & PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCE SERVICES SANTA ANA HEIGHTS, CAUFORNIA 92707 PHONE: (71 4) 966-9022 0 FM: (71 4) 966-0923 NO - atious,at-WORA-1,36 -xe City PfcparedB Y,, Jeff William gaydch,. "Mao Siibmitteabyi, madko; Inc, 2032firvitie,Avenge. $Uit6-F-2 �anq Ana,,Holghts, C A 92707 Fax#'714.966:0929' Prepared,F or, Irvine Apat-, 'Cafifdt6iAk6 7,614 0 .7 8eoteinbei2l,1995' AW Management Summary A Phase H archaeological investigation was conducted at CA-ORA-136 at the request of the ' Irvine Apartment Communities. Excavations were conducted in May of 1995 to recover cultural resources and ecological data located on the site, and to apply these data to research issues of regional significance in the prehistory. of Orange County. ' The site is located in the City of Newport Beach, Orange County, California on a 6.4 acre parcel designated as Block 800. This property is bordered by San Clemente Drive on the north, office buildings and Newport Center Drive to the south and east, and Santa Barbara Drive to the west. Field procedures included surface collection and excavation. Surface collection involved locating and mapping individual artifacts found on the ground surface. An excavation strategy was ' developed based on this site density and boundary information incorporating judgmental placement of excavation units within areas of greatest information potential. Units were excavated in arbitrary 10cm. contour levels in keeping with current professional practice ' The artifact assemblage included projectile points (dating to the Milling Stone Period), hammer stones, manos, metates, ground stone fragments, and a bone tool. The focus of activities on the site were hunting and seed processing, as evidenced by projectile points, bifaces, and ground stone implements, some of which are heavily modified, or curated. ' Food supplies were supplemented with marine resources both vertebrate and invertebrate. The majority of the shellfish were of species obtained in bay estuary environments. The heavily modified nature of some of the artifacts indicates a possible long term occupation, though the ' sparse faunal evidence seems contrary to this conclusion. The research potential of small, mixed, subsurface sites like CA-ORA-136 has been exhausted with the conclusion of this excavation, and it is not likely that additional investigation will yield further information. Therefore, no further archaeological investigations are recommended at this site. A qualified archaeologist should be present during earth -moving at the site, however, in order to evaluate any cultural resources that might be encountered during the course of work. ' The monitoring program will serve as the final mitigation for CA-ORA-136. 1 AW Staffing And Acknowledgments This report was prepared by the staff of Macko, Inc. under the direction of Principal Investigator ' Michael E. Macko. Researchers included: Michael E. Macko, Jeffrey S. Couch, Tracy A. Stropes, Kevin S. Buffington, David D. Earle, and William Hayden. Macko, Inc. staff included Melanie Bigelow, Mercy Leithem, Cheryl Sinopoli, and Carri Hunter, who were responsible for artifact sorting and identification. Cataloging and data entry was executed by Carri Hunter. Tracy Stropes produced all artifact illustrations. William Hayden digitized all site maps and is responsible for report graphics. Fieldwork, under the direction of Macko, was conducted by Domingo Belardes, Steve Coven, Tomas Diazibarra, Curt Duke, Cheryl Harper, and Keith Rhodes. Table Of Contents SECTION PAGE MANAGEMENTSUMMARY................................................................................................................................... i STAFFINGAND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS............................................................................................................ii TABLEOF CONTENTS...................................................... ..................................................................................... iii TABLEOF FIGURES................................................................................................................................................ V LISTOF TABLES...................................................................................................................................................... v INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................................... I LOCATION...................................................................................................................................................................... 1 ENVIRONMENTALSETTING................................................................................................................................ I GEOLOGY....................................................................................................................................................................... 1 AQUATICENVIRONMENTS.............................................................................................................................................. 4 TERRESTRIALENVIRONMENTS................................................................................................................................. I..... 6 CULTURALSETTING.............................................................................................................................................. a ARCHAEOLOGY.............................................................................................................................................................. 8 ThePaleo-Coastal Period........................................................................................................................................ 8 MillingStone Horizon.............................................................................................................................................. 9 IntermediatePeriod................................................................................................................................................10 TheLate Prehistoric Period...................................................................................................................................11 ETHNOHISTORY..........................................................................................................................................I................. 11 HISTORY...................................................................................................................................................................... 12 TheBoy Scout Jamboree Of 1953..........................................................................................................................12 PREVIOUSRESEARCH.........................................................................................................................................13 AREAHISTORY............................................................................................................................................................ 13 PREVIOUSEXCAVATIONS AT 136................................................................................................................................. 14 RESEARCHDESIGN..............................................................................................................................................14 METHODS................................................................................................................................................................16 RESULTS...................................................................................................................................................................17 SITE CONDITION AND STRATIGRAPHIC INTERPRETATIONS........................................................................................... 17 FEATUREANALYSIS..................................................................................................................................................... 17 FAUNALANALYSIS....................................................................................................................................................... 19 Vertebrates.............................................................................................................................................................19 BoneTools ................... ..."...................................................................................................................................... 20 Invertebrates......................................................................................................................................................I.... 20 LITHICANALYSIS......................................................................................................................................................... 20 HammerStones...................................................................................................................................................... 22 ProjectilePoints And Bifaces................................................................................................................................. 24 M�i 14,V46. lil DebitageAnalysis................................................................................................................................................... 25 GroundState Tools................................................................................................................................................ 26 Manos................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Metates................................................................................................................................................................................. 29 GroundState Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 29 TradeAnd Raw Material........................................................................................................................................ 30 LithicSummary ...................................................................................................................................................... 31 HISTORICARTRtACTS................................................................................................................................................... 32 DISCUSSION............................................................................................................................................................ 33 RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................................................................................................... 35 MANAGEMENTCONSIDERATIONS................................................................................................................................ 35 CITED............................................................................................................................................ 37 APPENDIX A: DATABASE APPENDIX B: CODEBOOK i F1ldkv,1 y c • iv 1 AW 1 1 Table Of Figures 1 FIGURE 1. PROJECT AREA MAP..................................................................................................................................... 2 FIGURE2. SITE LOCATION MAP.................................................................................................................................... 3 1 FIGURE3. SITEMAP.................................................................................................................................................... 18 FIGURE4. PROJECTILE POINTS FROM CA-ORA-136. .................................................................................................. 24 i 1 List Of Tables 1 TABLE I. CHRONOLOGY RESULTING FROM NCAP. ....................................................................................................... 9 TABLE 2. ARTIFACTS RECOVERED DURING PCAS EXCAVATIONS............................................................................... 15 TABLE 3. LIST OF VERTEBRATE TAXA FROM CA-ORA-136 IN AGGREGATE, BY NUMBER OF IDENTIFIABLE 1 SPECIMENS (NISP), MINIMUM NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS (MNI), AND WEIGHT IN GRAMS (WT)......... I ........ I... 19 TABLE 4. LIST OF INVERTEBRATE TAXA FROM CA-ORA-136, IN AGGREGATE; GIVEN BY NUMBER OF IDENTIFIABLE SPECIMENS (NISP), LEFT VALVE (LEFTS), RIGHT VALVE (RIGHTS), MINIMUM NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS (MNI), ANDWEIGHT IN GRAMS(WT)............................................................................................................................ 21 1 TABLE 5. HAMMER STONES FROM CA-ORA-136....................................................................................................... 23 TABLE 6. QUANTITIES OF DEBITAGE BY TYPE AND MATERIAL................................................................................... 27 TABLE 7. PERCENT OF DEBITAGE BY TYPE AND MATERIAL........................................................................................ 28 1 TABLE 8. ATTRIBUTES OFMANOS FROM CA-ORA-136............................................................................................. 30 TABLE 9. ATTRIBUTES oFMETATEs FROM CA-ORA-136........................................................................................... 32 TABLE 10. HISTORIC ARTIFACTS................................................................................................................................. 32 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mew, Imo- V ' Introduction ' The Block 800 Archaeological Project is a Phase 1I testing program designed to mitigate the effects of the construction of an apartment complex atop CA-ORA-136, a prehistoric ' archaeological site. The work conducted was designed to identify site values, then recover these values from the site using contemporary scientific archaeological techniques for mapping, excavation, and analysis. Location ' The Block 800 Project area is a 6.4 acre vacant lot located in the City of Newport Beach, Orange ' County, California (Figures 1 & 2). It is bordered by San Clemente Drive on the north, office buildings and Newport Center Drive to the south and east, and Santa Barbara Drive to the west. Geographically, the site is located on a bluff, 150 ft. above sea level and approximately 0.7 km. east of Upper Newport Bay, on the western most extent of the San Joaquin Hills (West 1/4 of the East 1/4 of Sec. 55, T.6S., R.10W., USGS 7.5' Newport Beach 1965. Environmental Setting ' Geology ' The Newport area can be characterized as containing four physiographic entities: 1) Newport Mesa, a smooth -topped, uplifted, slightly tipped block northwest of Newport ' Bay. Merging into the neighboring Tustin Plain to the north, the mesa is bounded on three sides by steep cliffs; 2) The Tustin Plain, a portion of the much broader Central Los Angeles Plain (Yerkes et al. 1965). The Tustin Plain is a smooth and relatively flat feature (Slife 1963:5-6) derived primarily from fluvial deposits transported by the Santa Ana River and its tributaries from tthe Santa Ana Mountains (Stevenson and Emery 1958:9); II' ,.... l'g y1 ' 1 f, yap",^� .�''') � M1i)�n$^�'i'?�``•''• 19E 1 to Mai �ana.tin t a • tan ' *in �•'"' -.yt. •� `, u,�; '` < 6 �,r. IJ Lido (•,. 1V�W PtRT / • �t.,•:=;(w, �; } bpi 1' '` � ,'�•tc, Hill _ SE;AC aaet�$Rf gal _ � � `,'4hly��"fit .� '�; � r `,r.?���,`„�' • � �` �:•, . �.. ` } � •fa .S y ��. .�i�MY�UY R ,'A"•y•� ]{„I' S ] . N Figure I. Project Area Map. USGS Santa Ana 1:250,000 map 1959 (photorevised 1979) 2 Figure 2. Site \ rp4cne del mar , , N, i1 tfh Be � ` 1pl /rsa .� �. J�A ,r ✓ „ l L. �2eJ Imr : HIv ' i / % / 1 t �l), Y K ; :%. ;�:Lg�`rp • :1' 73 /411^ jIl�llrl.� �/' % ,gam �ti•i `%a s•CH .1,, .. �c7_a �e / 9Mk, v. 1 ".j`• // (/ lam\` �`12iX;'; '. ♦ _� . • � j/.+ ') .�'� f��•."+ 71 CO • S a •�� S *�;} •, t.,}r'-1112T] '1 ; `\. /�,. {ifnf 9ch bu �i',' •Q� i" j i t• ' i Y f�� R boriVin/f �j E[ T_ay • i, \, Location Map. USGS 7.5' NewportBeach 1965 Quad (pholorevrsed 1961) USGS 7.5' NewportBeach 1965 Quad (photorevised 1981) USGS 7.5' Newport Beach 1965 Quad (photorevised 1981) Mae, 1ltz' 3 M&\ 3) The Santa Ana Mountains and the San Joaquin Hills to the south and east of the project (Stevenson and Emery 1958:9). The San Joaquin Hills are bounded on their seaward side by a nearly continuous 80-100 foot sea cliff dropping down to rocky tidal zone at the ocean's edge. Where streams meet the ocean, fluvial deposits have created sandy beaches. Rising to an elevation of approximately 1100 feet, the San Joaquin Hills drop rather steeply where they meet the Tustin Plain. On the seaward side of the San Joaquin Hills, remnants of at least ten wave cut terraces ranging in elevation between 30 and 900 feet have been noted. These have been attributed to changes in sea level and uplifting taking place in the Pleistocene (Stevenson and Emery 1958:11). 4) Newport Bay, a narrow inlet bordered by high vertical cliffs•40 to 100 feet tall on its east and west sides. The sand spit now known as the Balboa Peninsula which guards the entrance to the bay began forming as early as 800 years ago and was fully formed by the middle of the nineteenth century by flooding episodes and changes in the course of the Santa Ana River. The north or upstream end of the bay reaches into the Tustin Plain. Today the depth of the bay ranges from only a few inches to a maximum of twelve feet. During the early Holocene, it was a deep water bay with little silting and a poorly developed marsh environment (Dickason 1971:50). The tideland and salt marsh encompasses approximately 1000 acres. Although the Santa Ana River once emptied into the bay during the Pleistocene, its course during the period of prehistoric occupation of concern here has been at various locations to the west of Newport Mesa. Today only smaller drainages enter the bay, the primary drainage being San Diego Creek with other smaller drainages including Big Canyon and Bonita Creek. The site itself lies atop a Quaternary non -marine terrace deposit, underlain by the Topanga Formation (a middle Miocene deposit consisting of shales, siltstones, and sandstones with a conglomeritic basement that dips gently to the southwest [Tan and Edgington 1976]) which comprises the bulk of the San Joaquin Hills. These hills are highly eroded and are cut by steep - walled, deep canyons which trend southwest/northeast. Aquatic Environments Despite extensive commercial and residential development, Newport Bay still provides a wide range of estuary, marine, and terrestrial habitats. However, the current "natural" environment has been massively modified by flood control projects, development projects, road construction, and invasions of non-native plants and animals. Within a marsh/estuary environment four distinctive environments can be defined as distance from the ocean increases: 1) subtidal (always submerged), 2) intertidal mudflats, lacking in vegetation, 3) salt marshes; and in places with sufficient freshwater inflow, 4) freshwater marshes. Both fresh and salt water marshes are found within Newport Bay. They are both fertile biotic zones which support large and varied populations of plant and animal communities some of which were heavily exploited by the native populations. N46�6 14*4 , 4 I' U 11 Shallow -water sharks and rays seem to have been important food species, as suggested by the great number of their remains recovered from local archaeological deposits. Taking these species would have been relatively easy for people with simple technology. Wetlands also provide a nursery environment during the spring and summer for numerous open ocean and ocean reef species such as white sea bass, pile surf perch, staghorn sculpin, and spotfin croaker. Many sharks and rays can be caught with bare hands, others require fish spears and nets. The wetland environment also provides year-round habitat for aquatic buds such as the mallard duck, various gulls, and double crested cormorant. Migratory waterfowl also visited the bay in great numbers and would have been available to Native American groups. This would include such species such as Canada goose, northern shoveler, pintail duck, and various teal. Migratory birds generally visit in winter, but some, such as the arctic and common loon, ring -billed gull, American bittern, and western grebe, are known to visit during summer months. Taking waterfowl would have been somewhat more labor intensive than taking fish and may have required such technology as nets, spears, or bow and arrow. Shellfish were another important source of food for Native Americans living near Newport Bay. Scallops, oysters, and clams can all be found living in the mudflats, sandflats and gravels of the bay. Other nearby habitats contain considerable animal and plant resources which were intensively exploited by the prehistoric populations in the vicinity of Newport Bay and the San Joaquin Hills. These include the sandy beaches and rocky shores open to the Pacific Ocean as well as nearby kelp beds and shallow reefs located immediately offshore. In southern California today, open coast sandy beaches comprise about 80 percent of the coastal environment. The majority of southern California beaches are physically unstable. In winter, short wavelength surf removes sand, reducing some beaches to a pavement of cobbles and pebbles. Long wavelength surf of summer puts sand back (Backus 1989:6). The sandy beach habitat is found on the ocean side of the Balboa Peninsula, north of Newport Bay and in a few places south of Corona Del Mar. Some shellfish species of limited economic importance to Native American populations are found in this habitat including bent -nose clams, Pismo clams, and small bean clams. A rich marine habitat exists directly offshore, including several species of shark and ray, as well as anchovy, smelt, surf perch, croaker, and midshipman. In this environment, a variety of fishing methods was probably utilized including beach seines, dip nets, gorges, and hooks (Salls 1988). Gorges and hooks along with bones of these species show up regularly in the archaeological record. Southern California has numerous areas of rocky coastline. These rocky foreshores comprise about twenty percent of the coast and provide habitat for a more diverse marine population than other environments. The most important shellfish found here is California mussel which forms dense colonies. Numerous species of intertidal fish including perch, opaleye, clingfish, and sculpin also inhabit this ecosystem (Backus 1989:5). In most places where a rocky substrate exists kelp grows in abundance, and kelp beds are among the most productive environments on the coast. Among the numerous species which occur within this habitat are northern anchovy, various species of bass and surf perch, barracuda, California sheephead, senorita, blacksmith, and mackerel (Salls 1988). As MAe4v, Imo. with the marsh/estuary habitats, procurement could have been by net, hand, or spear and therefore was less labor intensive than would have been the case for the offshore habitats. Terrestrial Environments 1 The "natural" environment of the Newport area has been extensively modified over the years by flood control projects, development projects, road construction, and invasions of non-native plants ' and animals. However, remnants of the original plant communities do exist in modified forms. The following terrestrial plant communities exist for the Newport/San Joaquin Hills area: Riparian Woodland, Grassland-Herbland, Southern Oak Woodland, Coastal Sage Scrub, and Chaparral. The dominant community is the Coastal Sage Scrub (Munz and Keck 1949). Plants in this ' community have woody stems and typically range in size from one to five feet tall. Principal species include California sagebrush, encelia, buckwheat, white sage, and purple sage. This community is generally found on hills and slopes near the coast. It was a very productive community for the prehistoric inhabitants along the coast providing great quantities of edible sage and buckwheat seeds (King and Koerper 1991). The Grassland Community is typically found below 1500 feet elevation on relatively flat or gently sloping hillsides that have a deep layer of clay bearing soil. The major species of this community included foothill needlegrass, purple needlegrass, bluegrass and triple -awned grass (Munz and Keck 1949). These have been largely replaced by oats, foxtail barley, various bromes, various mustards, filarees, burr clover and other introduced species. The Grassland Community was a very important source of edible seeds for the Native American populations in the area during prehistory (Koerper 1991; Klug and Koerper 1991). ' In some areas of the San Joaquin Hills, particularly on north facing slopes with deep soils and canyon bottomlands, one finds Southern Oak Woodland (Munz and Keck 1949) communities. This community consists of trees 20 to 60 feet tall with an understory of grasses. Key species are coast live oak, Englemann oak, and California walnut. Also associated with this community (and the Chaparral Community) are scrub oak, laurel sumac, and toyon. The Southern Oak Woodland is not found directly within the Project Area, but is known nearby in upper Shady Canyon, Laurel Canyon, and upper Bommer Canyon and was formerly extensive in nearby Coyote and Bonita Canyons. Small remnant patches may be found in the bottoms of many unnamed canyons that have small areas of well -developed soils (King and Koerper 1991). This community was of great economic significance to prehistoric populations due to the importance of acorns to the diet especially during the Late Prehistoric Period. Along the southern California coast, the species preferred for edible acorns was coast live oak (Gifford 1971; Koerper 1991). This community is thought to have much more widespread before the arrival of Euro-Americans. The Riparian Woodland Community is located along streams, springs and seeps. In the vicinity of the Project Area there are small vestigial Riparian Woodlands in various canyon bottoms where soils are developed and moisture is available, such as in Buck Gully, Moro Canyon, Emerald Canyon, and Los Trancos Canyon. Well -developed Riparian Woodlands still exist Mom, f*.c- 6 ' nearby in San Diego Creek (Upper Newport Bay), Big Canyon, Upper Coyote Canyon, Laguna Canyon and Upper Wood Canyon. This community is characterized by the presence of various trees requiring a relatively mesic environment: alders, willows, sycamores and cottonwoods. t Coast live oak is often found in this community as well and there is often a dense understory of grasses, herbs and shrubs. This community was also of great economic importance to prehistoric populations because of the presence of coast live oak and various herbs, shrubs and grasses (Klug and Koerper 1991) . The Chaparral Community is the most widespread community moving away from the coast and gaining altitude.. It is characterized by the presence of woody shrubs that can attain heights of 10 feet or more: chamise, scrub oak, ceanothus, manzanita, toyon, lemonadeberry, laurel sumac and ' mountain mahogany. Chaparral species have deep roots, are adapted to drier conditions and are typically found on sunny, south -facing slopes at higher altitude than the Project Area. This plant community is limited in the San Joaquin Hills to more mesic slopes of the upper canyons. Plants with edible portions from this community include: toyon (berries), lemonadeberry (berries), buckwheat (seeds and leaves), sage (seeds), red maids (seeds), mariposa lily (bulbs) wild hyacinth (corms) and wild onion (whole plant) (Klug and Koerper 1991). These environments were habitats for a wide variety of animals, the most economically important of which were deer, rabbit, jackrabbit, and ground squirrel. These species were found in all of the ' above habitats and were available year-round. The smaller game would have required simple traps and spears for capture, while the large game such as deer would have required the use of the atlatl and dart or bow and arrow. Projectile points, scrapers, knives, and other stone tools result from ' small and big game exploitation and survive in the archaeological record. ' Within Newport Bay and the San Joaquin Hills was a variety of rich habitats that contained abundant and assorted fauna and flora during prehistory. Over 100 different species have been recovered from sites in the vicinity of Newport Bay (Peterson 1991). In the winter months, the ' area was host to large populations of migratory waterfowl. In the summer, the largest populations of fish were available. Most mammalian, species were available all year as were shellfish species. Among the most economically significant environments in prehistory were the subtidal channels, ' nearby grassland, and kelp beds. Because of the wealth and biotic diversity of the area, it was possible to support a comparatively dense zone of human occupation in the Newport Bay area through most of prehistory. Cultural Setting Archaeology The most frequently cited chronological sequences developed and applied to the prehistory of southwestern California are those of Wallace (1955) and Warren (1968). 0 Paleo-Coastal Period (Before 8000 BP) O Milling Stone Period (8000-3000 BP) 0 Intermediate Period (3000-1500 BP) Ct Late Prehistoric Period (1500-200 BP) The relative infrequency of early sites makes it particularly difficult to establish the nature and extent of early human occupations. Pleistocene period occupations in coastal southern California may be particularly rare due to rising sea levels and continual cliff retreat which could alter or destroy sites (Bickel 1978). But data gathered throughout the hemisphere continue to ' demonstrate the probable authenticity of a Late Pleistocene human presence. For instance, the recent development of cation -ratio dating of desert varnish has tentatively identified the presence of human populations in the desert regions only 90 miles from Orange County at 20,000 years ago, suggesting the possibility of a human presence in the coastal region at the same time (Dorn 1982; Dorn et al. 1986). ' The most significant archaeological research to date relating to the prehistoric cultural chronology of Orange County is the Newport Coast Archaeological Project. After conducting ' excavations at 37 sites and obtaining some 41 AMS (Accelerator Mass Spectometry) dates and 285 radiocarbon dates, Peterson (1994) offered a refinement of the traditional chronology for southern California. They noted temporal subdivisions within the Milling Stone Period and the ' Late Prehistoric Period based solely on clustering in the frequency distribution of absolute dates. The Chronology developed from this project is seen in Table 1 below. The Paleo-Coastal Period ' The Paleo-Coastal Period is thought to represent a culture that emphasized hunting, primarily because sites from this period lack milling equipment. The lithic tradition includes distinctive Lake Mojave, Silverlake Series, and foliate projectile points, crescentic stones, flaked -stone knives, and various scrapers and planes. In the San Diego area, this period is also called the San Dieguito Period (Warren 1984). 8 II II It Milling Stone Horizon Post -Pleistocene cultural adaptations in North America are often described as involving a "settling in" process whereby societies began to focus on local subsistence resources, developing new technologies and social systems with which to exploit their environment. Subsequent to initial settlement in southern coastal California, this process appears to be evidenced by a technological phase referred to by Wallace (1955, 1978) as the Milling Stone Horizon. In coastal San Diego and southern Orange Counties, the term "La Jolla Complex" is sometimes used to describe Milling Stone complex sites associated with shell middens near sloughs and lagoons (Moratto 1985:147). Table 7.,ClXppoltl#t1 CCStiI#iukfrglnN.VAP.. Paleo-Coastal.............................Prior - 8,000 BP Milling Stone..............................8,000 - 3 000 BP MS1.............................................8,000 - 5,800 BP MS2... .......................................... 5,800 - 4,650 BP MS3.............................................4,650 - 3,000 BP Late Prehistoric............................1,350 - 200 BP LP1.................................................1,350 - 650 BP LP2....................................................650 - 200 BP This period represents a cultural transition from a hunting focus to the use of hard seeds as suggested by a dramatic drop in the numbers of projectile points and the appearance of numerous manos and metates (Wallace 1955). Other artifacts typical of this period consist of heavy -keeled scrapers, flake scrapers, scraper -planes, knives, discoidals and cogged stones. Although the uses of discoidals and cogged stones are not known, they are established as Milling Stone/La Jolla Period diagnostics. Often found in caches or intentionally positioned, cogged stones have been located near the project area. Kowta (1969) accounts for the increased human presence on the coast by suggesting that migrations from the Great Basin would be expected at about 8000 RYBP as that region became increasingly and and xeric flora were adapting to coastal zones. Kowta postulates that people formerly occupying zones adjacent to Pleistocene lakes followed game to wooded coastal valleys and were drawn to resources available in littoral regions. Whatever the cause, the larger number of archaeological sites ascribed to this period has led archaeologists to postulate that the period between 6000 and 4000 BC was marked by an increasing human population in southwestern California (Glassow et al. 1985). The Irvine site, ORA-64, located adjacent to the upper Newport Bay, has been designated as a La Jolla complex site (Moratto 1985:149) from which Drover (1975) has described decorated pottery and ceramic figurines. Radiocarbon dates associated with this site range between roughly 5000 and 8000 BP, though two fired -clay items were dated to 3200 BP using thermoluminescence. H4646 114Z' 9 Littoral occupations along the southern California coast during the later years of the Milling Stone Horizon have been specifically referred to by Warren (1968) as belonging to the "Encinitas Tradition". Manos and metates are still representative of this component, large projectile points occur more frequently, and mortars and pestles come into use but remain rare. The Los Angeles and Orange County areas during the period between 3000 BC and 2000 BC have been characterized as being marked by "cultural conservatism" (Wallace 1978:30). This contrasts with cultural developments in the Santa Barbara Channel area where a complex maritime subsistence technology was being developed (King 1981). The artifact assemblages in the Santa Barbara ' Channel region include a wider variety of projectile points, while mortars and pestles virtually replace manos and metates. The use of the mortar and pestle is consistent with a major subsistence shift towards exploitation of acorns throughout most of California, but in Orange County the shift was delayed by several thousand years, likely due to lack of a need to change. Processing acorns is seen as a basic ecological component of aboriginal adaptations in much of California. Intermediate Period ' Wallace (1955) referred to the cultural period along the southern California Coast between 2000 BC and AD 500 as the Intermediate Period. This period is also referred to as the Campbell Tradition (Warren 1968). Relatively little is known about this time period in the Orange County area due to the scarcity of radiocarbon dated and stratified sites. But for those which have been dated, the percentage of sites within the Intermediate Period is quite small, suggesting a significant depopulation of the region. In the Newport Coast Archaeological Project, researchers found occupations from this period in only four of 37 sites (Bonner and Peterson 1994). All of the sites in the Newport Coast Archaeological Project with Intermediate Period components were occupied primarily during other periods. According to Elsasser (1978:55), the southern Cali- fornia coast can be divided into four subregions, each with a different date marking the beginning of this period. These areas include the Santa Barbara mainland, the Channel Islands, Los Angeles (Santa Monica Mountains), and San Diego, the latter being the most poorly known area exhibiting sites with Intermediate period components. Artifacts most common and representative of this period include mortars, pestles, basket -hopper mortars, manos, and metates. Less frequent are broad leaf -shaped blades, leaf -shaped projectile points, stemmed projectile points, occasional shell and bone beads, use of asphaltum, and steatite ' ornaments. Rice and Cottrell (1976) discuss a southern coast adaptation which they refer to as "Late Encinitas", a late manifestation of the Encinitas Tradition which shows some Campbell Tradition influences, such as mortar/pestle technology and diversification of projectile points. The Late Prehistoric Period Cultural changes post-dating AD 500 are thought to have begun with the arrival of a Shoshonean speaking population emigrating from the southern Great Basin (True 1966). However, some ' scholars suggest this Shoshonean migration may have taken place much earlier as increasingly and conditions obtained in the Great Basin, possibly between 8000 and 2000 years BP (C. King 1981; Kowta 1969; Moratto 1984). Ethnohistoric evidence implies that these intruders forced a ' wedge into the Hokan-speaking groups of southern California, resulting in the separation of the Hokan-speaking Chumash of Ventura and northern Los Angeles Counties from those of southern San Diego County. Shoshonean languages were spoken by the Cahuilla, Serrano, Gabrielino, ' Juaneno, and Luiseno. As a result of these migrations, coastal southern native societies acquired pottery, smoking pipes, the bow and arrow, small side -notched projectile points, and the use of cremation in place of inhumation as the final rite of passage. ' Ross (1970) identified a Late Period complex, referred to as the Irvine Complex, in coastal Orange County based upon the analysis of materials at ORA-190 near Newport Bay. Having ' dated the stratified midden to between AD 600 and 1450, Ross documented that the Irvine complex exhibits a strong emphasis in marine and estuary resource procurement, suggested by the remains of 65 marine invertebrates species, 11 fish species, and three marine mammals ' species. Rice and Cottrell (1976) describe an Early Shoshonean material culture in Orange County which reflects an organization more socially and politically complex than previous culture periods, primarily relating to new subsistence strategies. This phase is distinguished from a Late ' Shoshonean material culture, as San Luis Rey I and H are distinguished by the introduction of pottery (Rice and Cottrell 1976:40). ' The Late Prehistoric Period is characterized by the presence of Cottonwood Series projectile points, the increased occurrence of brownware pottery in some areas, more abundant shell and steatite beads, steatite arrowshaft straighteners and a generally more elaborate material culture. Trade up the Mojave River corridor was very active linking the southern California coast with the Colorado River and the Southwest. Larger, more permanent habitation sites occur during this period along the coast as a result of an increasingly successful adaptation to littoral and marine ' environments and a flexible, diverse economy (Warren 1984). ' Ethnohistory ' At the time of European contact, the area around Newport Beach was inhabited by Shoshonean speakers that have come to be known as the Gabrielino, after the mission at San Gabriel. The Gabrielino controlled the entire Los Angeles basin from Topanga Canyon near Malibu to Aliso Creek near Laguna Beach and from the coast of the Pacific Ocean to San Bernardino and the foothills north of the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valleys. They also occupied the islands of ' Santa Catalina, San Clemente, Santa Barbara and San Nicolas (Bean and,Smith 1978). ' Mew- Irc • 11 For the most part, they lived in permanent villages and stayed in temporary gathering camps when making trips to collect distant resources. All villages were located near permanent springs or water courses, such as the Santa Ana River. The Gabrielino lived in large circular, dome -roofed houses made of tule or carrizo that were up to 60 feet in diameter. Typical houses are thought to have been on the order of 20 to 30 feet in diameter. Villages may have contained up to 200 people. The area they occupied contained a wide variety of habitats, such as the open ocean, coastal strand, salt and freshwater marshes like Upper Newport Bay, prairie, coastal sage scrub, chaparral, oak woodland and pine forests. They practiced a broad -based economy in which trade is thought to have played a major role. They also controlled the quarries of steatite, or soapstone on Santa Catalina Island from which was made figurines, bowels, pipes and many, other functional and decorative items. Steatite was heavily traded to the Chumash to the north and to a lessor degree elsewhere. In general, the Gabrielino had a rich material culture similar to that of the Chumash, for whom we have more extensive ethnographic and archaeological information (Bean and Smith 1978). This included bedrock and portable mortars, metates, manos, shell spoons, wooden bowls (often inlaid with abalone shell), pottery vessels, bone or shell needles, fishhooks and awls of bone, scrapers, flakers of bone, stone or shell, stone knives, steatite figurines, shell beads and other decorative items of shell and steatite. History The Boy Scout Jamboree Of 1953 In July of 1953 the Boys Scouts of America held an International Boy Scout Jamboree on the Irvine Ranch. The jamboree site occupied Irvine Ranch property on both sides of Jamboree Road from just south of the San Diego Creek channel to Highway 1. This area encompasses the CA- ORA-136 site. The jamboree brought together some 45,000 Boy Scouts and Explorers from 22 nations. This gathering involved the erection of a tent city of 25,000 tents to house the visiting scouts, and the temporary establishment of an array of special facilities. These included a hospital, a bank, fire station, telephone center, water system, radio station, post office, and amphitheater. Police and medical personnel alone numbered over 300. The large medical infrastructure reflected concern over possible outbreaks of poliomyletis or other diseases among the 45,000 attendees, who were each given a physical exam upon arrival. Special areas for horse riding, archery, shooting, trailcraft, and livestock and conservation activities were also laid out, as well as a parking lot and transportation stations. A number of large tented trading posts were set up. Special areas were set aside for large nightly campfires. The use of jamboree facilities spanned a period of two weeks, from July 13 through July 27th. The jamboree was officially opened on July 17th and closed on July 23rd. In addition to varied scouting activities, the jamboree featured visits by Hollywood celebrities- Debbie Reynolds, Roy Rodgers and Dale Evans, George Murphy, Jimmy Stewart, Bob Hope, Danny Kaye, Eddie Mom, 14,1,c. 12 NW Bracken, and others. Vice President Richard Nixon, visiting his old troop, also stopped by and addressed the scouts. Individual Boy Scout Troops and Patrols were housed in tents in sections organized by region of geographical origin. A major activity for the scouts was the swapping or trading of souvenirs of the event and of the home states of boys attending. Scouts brought supplies of local items from their home areas to trade. Southern California scouts traded seashells and other locally associated items. Food supplies were issued on a daily basis from central commissaries to individual Troops, numbering some 1,100. Within each Troop, each of four constituent Patrols prepared its own meals at its tenting site, using charcoal briquette stoves to cook on, and disposable paper cups and plates. Metal eating utensils were also issued. Two -seat box latrines and urinal were issued to each Troop, to be sited over pre -dug 6latrine holes. Waste water pits several feet deep were also constructed by each Troop. Refuse was placed in 26-gallon garbage cans collected nightly to a central location. The vicinity of CA-ORA-136 was occupied by the tent facilities comprising areas 10 and 38, housing scouts from Region 11, and Trading Post A. A campfire area (#2) was also located to the east. These facilities were served by Irvine Road and Marine Ave. West, which roughly followed the route of modern Jamboree Road, and Marine Ave. East. The modern arrangement of roads in the area does not, however, reflect the roadnet used for the jamboree. Previous Research Area History Numerous archaeological projects have been pursued throughout the San Joaquin Hills area, many of those in the Newport Bay region. In 1912 the first archaeological survey in the region was carried out by Nels C. Nelson (Chace 1966). During his visit to a then growing vacation spot, Nelson made a minor survey of archaeological sites and middens scattered throughout the area. Although by today's standards Nelsons notes were substandard, he still managed to record the presence of about fifteen archaeological middens. Nelson did not find the shell middens of Newport Bay to be nearly as impressive as those of San Francisco Bay which he was considerably more accustomed to. Over all, Nelson was not impressed with the local sites and made no further attempt to study the region. Herman F. Strandt felt quite the opposite however and from 1921 until his death in 1964 continued to do a considerable amount of surveying, excavating and collecting of various sites through out Orange County. Sadly however, Strand's notes are lost and all that remains are his maps. Other projects by various groups or agencies have been carried out through the surrounding areas of the ORA-136. From archaeological work in the 1930's by the Works Progress Administration (WPA) to various educational institutions, archaeological work has had a considerable history in the Newport region. Unfortunately, until the 1960's very little had actually been learned. It was not until the mid 1960's that a sound attempt was made to reconstruct those cultures native to the Newport Bay region. PI Ma- I4,rz • 13 )W/\ Previous Excavations At 136 In 1964 the Pacific Coast Archaeological Society (PCAS) surveyed and recorded seven sites in the area between Jamboree Road and MacArthur Boulevard, the Irvine Coast Country Club and Ford Road, on the east side of the bay. One of the sites located'by this survey was ORA-136. This survey characterized ORA-136 as a shell midden with some flake stone detritus. Even at the time of this survey disturbance by cultivation was recorded. They noted that several surface artifacts were collected, those artifacts most likely brought to surface by such cultivation. Excavation on ORA-136 began later in 1965 by the PCAS. A five foot trench was laid out and excavated in blocks of five feet each, and units were excavated in arbitrary six inch levels. At the time 1/4 inch mesh screen was employed so it is likely several smaller artifacts such as beads and micro fauna were not recovered. Several artifacts still remain from PCAS. excavations however. Twenty three of the artifacts came from the shallow midden while a remaining fifty five came from surface collections (Table 2). Based on artifactual data available Chace speculates that ORA-136 was a late Milling Stone occupation site occupied somewhere between 3000 BC and 1000 BC (Chace 1966). It should be noted that no radiocarbon samples were dated from ORA-136. Later surveys carried out at ORA-136 listed the site area as even more heavily impacted being both cultivated and cut by a paved roadway. Although both APC (Douglas 1972) and RMW Paleo Associates (Brown 1981) acknowledge this impact, both surveys still indicated the presence of archaeological remains at ORA-136. Research Design In an earlier work (Macko Archaeological Consulting 1994), a regional research design for the Orange County coastal area that included 65 specific research issues and questions was developed. A full discussion of research design issues can be found in this document. Of course, there are many questions that any particular Phase II excavation cannot address because of the limited nature of archaeological deposits, but all additional information is valuable to ongoing research in the area. Even small sites containing limited data can contribute in modest ways to issues like regional settlement pattern, prehistoric economy, trade and exchange, lithic and other technology, social organization, prehistoric ideology, population size, environmental reconstruction and regional chronology. t4aOi f,0'e • 14 �Nw Tohln 9.. Arfifnrlc rornvrred dnrinv PCAS excnvations Artifact Type Surface 0.6" 6-12" 12-18" Totals Milling Stones 13 1 0 0 14 Manos 10 4 0 0 14 Hammer Stones Unclassified 3 0 0 0 3 Cobble 7 0 0 0 7 Prepared, acute 3 1 0 1 5 Pitted 0 1 0 0 1 Scrapers Small, acute angled 2 0 0 0 2 Oval 1 0 0 0 1 Steep -angled 1 0 0 0 1 Side 3 1 0 0 4 End 0 0 1 0 1 Flake 1 1 0 0 2 Projectile Points Unclassified 4 1 1 1 7 Triangular, stemmed 1 0 0 1 2 Leaf, convex based 2 0 0 0 2 Leaf, straight based 1 0 0 0 1 Leaf, concave based 0 1 0 0 1 Miscellaneous Objects Polished conical form 0 1 0 0 1 Tarred pebble 0 1 0 0 1 Gnawed siltstone 1 2 0 0 3 Concretion with hole 0 1 0 0 1 Hematite nodule 1 0 0 0 1 Bone Points 0 2 0 0 2 Shell Scraper 1 0 0 0 1 Totals 1 55 1 18 1 2 1 3 1 78 (Source: Chace 1966) The primary goals of this Phase 11 investigation, then were to obtain what data we could through modern scientific archaeological techniques that this site. The sample obtained from this site is not necessarily representative of the site as a whole, but the data that would be destroyed in the path of the construction has been recovered and will be made, with this document, a part of the public record. The data that this site sample contains will be applied, in so far as possible, to the specific regional research questions detailed in Macko Archaeological Consulting, 1994. These specific research questions relate to the general issues listed above. II M4646110%c' 15 NW Methods Upon arrival at the Project Area, the site was relocated, brush was cleared and surface artifacts marked with pin flags. On the basis of the site surface artifact density and boundary information that this initial reexamination yielded, an excavation strategy was developed incorporating the judgmental placement of excavation units within areas of greatest information potential. Since accurate provenience forms such an important source of archaeological information, a Leitz TM1A, One -Second Theodolite and a Leitz RED IA Electronic Distance Measurer with a single prism target was utilized for mapping in excavation units and isolated artifacts. A surface collection was undertaken to aid in determining the site parameters and identifying areas of maximum artifact density. This was accomplished by an intensive pedestrian survey with individuals walking parallel transects approximately three meters apart. Excavation was carried out utilizing shovel, spade, pick -mattock and trowel. When encountering bedrock, the excavators utilized trowels and whisk brooms to clean out depressions and riffles in the rock, as artifacts are often found in these low points. Excavation field notes were kept on Macko, Inc. excavation level sheets. Units were excavated in arbitrary 10cm contour levels in keeping with current professional practice. A total of 15 1 x lm units were excavated (figure 3.). Excavated material was processed through a conventional 1/8 inch mesh dry screen suspended from a tetrapod. The resulting soil matrix was bagged and labeled then hauled by vehicle to a waterscreening area. Matrix was washed utilizing 1/8 inch mesh excavation screens and artifacts and faunal specimens were separated. Artifacts and specimens were dried, then placed in labeled bags and, at the end of the day, these bags were transported by auto or truck to the laboratory. At the laboratory, materials from the field were sorted into gross categories of bone, shell, chipped stone tools, debitage, ground stone, etc. These materials were catalogued in a .dbf compatible format, and tables, graphs, frequency distributions and other descriptive statistics were generated by Access© and Excel© software. Detailed analysis of the different material classes was performed by Macko, Inc. specialists. Faunal material was analyzed by Kevin Buffington, chipped stone tools and debitage were examined by Jeffrey S. Couch and Tracy Stropes, and descriptive statistics were generated by William Hayden. Mao, 11•c • 16 MV\ ' Results Site Condition And Stratigraphic Interpretations ' STRATIGRAPHIC INTERPRETATIONS ' The stratigraphy present at CA-ORA-136 is typical of stratigraphy seen throughout southern California coastal sites. As is often seen in sites such as 136, the stratigraphy is broken, mottled, and completely mixed by intense krotovina activity, agricultural activity or mixing from ' construction activities in the surrounding area. What little stratigraphy that does remain is simply made up of deposition of carbon from recent fires or the natural depositional changes that are continually taking place. Soils are chiefly comprised of light gray/brown sandy silt loam grading ' to a more compact loam with sporadic elements of clay deposits. Historic glass is noted at a depth of 120 cm showing the strata to be disturbed to considerable depth. Certain sections of the site, such as unit eight, show considerable mixing which may be fill from a redeposition during construction of roads near or around the site. While no occupational strata are clearly visible, the presence of some remaining geological strata are observable. Those strata which do remain are ' broken down into three basic stratagraphic horizons. Stratum one chiefly consists of a light gray/brown sandy silt loam with few isolated pockets of smaller substrata clay. The second horizon is basically the same as stratum one above with the acceptation of a considerably darker gray soil particles. The third identifiable stratum is a considerably lighter tan soil which, in contrast to the other horizons, is much less compact. The strata that do remain, however, are likely quaternary alluvial deposits eroding from the surrounding slopes. ' Feature Analysis t During excavation of Unit #3 a fire affected rock cluster was encountered at a depth of 90 cm. The feature consisted of twenty fire affected rocks resting in a natural depression in the sandstone that makes up a large part of the geological formation (Topanga) on which CA-ORA-136 sits. I'll' The feature was then expanded to include Units #11, 12, 13, 14, and 15. Feature expansion was required for a more complete picture of the nature of the feature. Previous excavations at ORA- 136 by the PCAS had failed to uncover any features. Feature 1 is typical of rock lined ovens or fie hearths chiefly consisting of locally available cobbles, discarded ground stone, and flaked stone tool fragments. Although little carbon remained in the feature, due to the heat damage displayed throughout the lithics contained within the cluster, the feature was determined to be a hearth or oven. No faunal remains were found within the feature with the exception of one turtle (emydidae) shellfragment. Many rodent burrows ran throughout the feature so it is possible that ' the shell fragment is intrusive. A fragment of historic green glass was also found within the feature, likely relating to the Boy Scout Jamboree of 1953 and probably intrusive to the feature matrix. The flaked stone which makes up the remaining fraction of the feature matrix, although ' probably not intrusive, shows no difference in spatial placement, flake type, or material type than the flaked stone throughout the remainder of the site. Due to the lack of carbon contained within the feature, no radio carbon samples were taken. I HAe4v, 17 1 m&n ' .. ;1 ~qLL �i':"4xt� _.arc ♦"e.r; ,s' ) _.. , ....r... Figure 3. Site Map. j HAe4o. l s c - M I II Faunal Analysis Vertebrates A total of 100 specimens, weighing 6.35g, were recovered (Table 3). At least six taxa (two fish, one bird, one turtle, and two mammals), are represented in the collection. Eighty two specimens, 82% of the sample, are unidentifiable vertebrate bone fragments. The fish species represented include the California Sheephead (Setnicossyphus pulcher) and bat ray (Myliobatis califomica). Both species are found commonly in coastal archaeological sites of southern California. Habitats of represented species include kelp forests over rocky bottom for sheephead and sandy bottom for bat rays (Fitch 1972:106; Feder, Turner, and Limbaugh 1974: 90) indicating the exploitation of the rocky coast and bay/estuary environments. The mammals include Black -Tailed Jack Rabbit (Lepus californicus), California Ground Squirrel (Spennophilus beecheyi), and unidentified rodent. The ground squirrel, jack rabbit, and rodent are probably recent non -cultural introductions to the site as evidenced by their low frequency of occurrence and lack of burning evidence. The genus and species of the turtle specimens could not be determined, nor could one specimen of bird. The remaining specimens were identified only as fish, mammals, and vertebrate remains. Table 3. List of Vertebrate Taxa Trom CA-ORA-136 in Aggregate, by Number of Identifiable Specimens (NISP), Minimum Number of Individuals (MNI), and Weight in grams (WT). Common Name Scientific Name NISP MNI WT(g) Unidentifiable Bony Fish Teleostei 4 ---- 0.06 Bat Ray Myliobatis califontica 1 1 0.63 California Sheephead Semicossyplurs pulcher 2 1 0.10 Unidentifiable Bird Avian 1 1 0.09 Unidentifiable Turtle Emydidae 2 ---- 0.45 California Ground Squirrel Spennophilus beecheyi 1 1 0.04 Black -tailed Jack Rabbit Lepus califonricus 1 1 0.10 Unidentifiable Rodent Rodentia 3 ---- 0.09 Unidentifiable Mammal Mammalia 3 ---- 0.71 Unidentifiable Vertebrate Vertebrata 82 ---- 4.08 TOTALS 100 5 6.35 The study sample indicates that the human occupants of the site engaged in limited fishing activities. There is no comparable evidence that the terrestrial species were important to the Mai 1 rc • 19 1 inhabitants of the site, since ground squirrel, jackrabbit, and rodent remains are probably recent ' intrusions. Bone Tools ' One bone tool was recovered during excavation. The bone tool is bluntly pointed and specific function is indeterminable. It bears abrasion scars from manufacturing, as well as polishing and sharpening from use. Similar modified bone tools were recovered from previous excavation (Chase 1966). Invertebrates A total of 310 specimens, weighing 371.17 g., were recovered from the site (Table 4). Like the fish species, shellfish taxa are from two distinct environments, bay -estuary and rocky coast. One hundred and forty four specimens, 46% of the sample, are unidentifiable invertebrate shell fragments. The bay -estuary specimens, 49% of the sample, include California venus (Chione undatella, C. californiensis, C. fluctifraga), scallop (Argopecten), Washington clam (Saxidomus nuttalli), and oyster (Ostrea lurida). All bay -estuary species occur naturally in Newport Bay. The rocky coast ' specimens, 4 percent of the sample, include abalone (Haliotis sp.), mussel (Mytilus californianus), moon shell (Polinices sp.), reversed jewel box (Pseudochama exogyra), and chitons (Polyplacophora ) (Allen 1990). The study sample indicates a predominance in bay -estuary marine resources, with minor rocky coast exploitation activities. This correlates with local archaeological sites within the vicinity of ' the Newport Bay. Lithic Analysis ■ An examination of the stone artifacts and stone tool manufacturing debris, or debitage, was undertaken for CA-ORA-136. The stone -artifact (lithic) assemblage was examined using a ' technological approach as well as macro/micro analysis of use wear. Technological analysis is a method of studying stone -tool assemblages that will allow the examiner a means by which to determine the method of manufacture, raw material procurement strategies, and probable function of the finished tools. As a result, an understanding of certain critical aspects of the subsistence behaviors of the prehistoric peoples can be determined. This approach is well described in many articles (Yerkes and Kardulias 1993; Titmus and Woods 1986; and Flenniken and Raymond 1986) and is the most effective means by which to analyze a lithic assemblage. Tools in the assemblage were studied using a binocular microscope at 70X to 300X in order to ' identify any use wear that the tool may have incurred. Except for making very fine distinctions between materials worked, 70X to 300X is sufficient to delineate major material types (Odell and Odell-Vereecken 1980). II I' M�, 20 Table 4. List of Invertebrate Taxa from Ca-ORA-136, in Aggregate; given by Number of Identifiable Specimens (NISP), Left Valve (Lefts), Right Valve (Rights), Minimum Number of Individuals (MNI), and Weight in grams (WT). Common Name Scientific Name NISP Lefts Rights MNI WT( r.) Frilled California Venus Chione undatella (hinge counts) 25 14 11 14 121.10 Frilled California Venus Chione undatella 62 ------ ------ ------ 53.10 California Venus Chione califondensis 1 ------ ------ ------ 2.08 Smooth California Venus Chione fhtctifraga 1 ------ ------ ------ 2.60 Undifferentiated California Venus Chione sp. 15 ------ ------ ------ 14.82 Scallop Argopecten aequisulcatus 7 4 3 4 31.28 Undifferentiated Scallop Argopecten sp. 30 ------ ------ ------ 17.56 Washington Clam Saxidoinus nuttalli I ------ ------ ------ 2.21 California Oyster Ostrea lurida (hinge counts) 3 2 1 2 7.66 Undifferentiated Oyster Ostrea lurida 7 ------ ------ ------ 2.76 Mussel Mytilus califondanus 4 ------ ------ ------ 1.77 Abalone Haliotis sp. 2 ------ ------ ------ 1.51 Reversed Jewel Box Pseudochama exogyra 1 ------ ------ ------ 8.22 Moon Shell Polinices sp. 5 ------ ------ ------ 13.52 Undifferentiated Chiton Polyplacophora 2 ------ ------ ------ 0.44 Unidentifiable Shell Mollusca 144 ------ ------ ------ 90.54 TOTALS 310 20 15 20 371.17 Replicative analyses conducted independently by Crabtree (1972), Flenniken (1985), Flenniken and Raymond (1986), Woods (1987, 1988), Flenniken and Wilke (1989), and Schroth (1994) provide a basis by which debitage and tools can be studied. By understanding the method in which an individual piece of chipping waste was created and its relation to the parent stone, the researcher can determine various reduction strategies employed by the ancient stone worker, and in turn understand the desired form of the finished tools, even if those tools are not present. However, when tools are present, they can be examined regarding desired function, function vs. stylistic traits, cultural or chronological variation, and method of manufacture. Additionally, a great deal of information about raw material availability, trade, raw material size and limitations, and more can be obtained from detailed analysis. Thus, tools and debitage recovered from this ' HAe4e, I**.e, - 21 project were divided and grouped by the physical attributes which indicated the technological ' means of manufacture and intended use. Hammer Stones ' Hammer stones are core/cobble tools (expedient tools in which the parental mass, rather than the removed flake is used as a tool, often with multiple uses) used for various hammering and battering tasks. They are identified by the battering and crushing, spontaneous flake detachment scars, or cortex removal evident on margins or planar surfaces. Hammer stones were used for various tasks such as chipped stone tool production, hulling acorns and other nuts, ground stone tool production and maintenance, and crushing bones to extract marrow. Without further detailed laboratory analysis it is impossible to determine the material upon which any one hammer was used or even if it was used for one task exclusively. However, some replicative studies have ' correlated particular hammer stone types with certain uses. Treganza and Valdivia (1955) replicated several ground stone items using hammer stones. In these studies they found that angular hammers were more effective in producing and maintaining ground stone. Schroth (1989), while replicating steatite artifacts, found that spherical hammers consistently broke and became angular. While using rounded cobbles for rejuvenating slick surfaces, Pritchard -Parker and Reid (1992) found that the edges of the cobbles continually broke and became angular. Angular hammers thus appear to be the most effective hammer stone type for ground stone tool production and maintenance, and are, at the minimum, assumed to represent this activity. ' Spherical hammers are generally assumed to represent chipped stone tool production, based on replicative analysis. However, the type of battering found on many spherical hammers is t indicative of a direct blow percussion (force delivered at a perpendicular or near perpendicular angle to the striking surface), such as would be used for hulling nuts, crushing bones, or core production. Most hammers used for removing flakes from cores (core reduction) if used enough ' develop facets similar to those on pestles, but located at various places and with varying angles. At the minimum, areas of striations develop where the hammer delivered a glancing blow to the core. However, it has been noted that reduction of single -platform, split -cobble cores is most ' efficient with large, spherical hammers and that their reduction results in battering, not faceting, of the used plane of the hammer. Those attributes considered most important for differentiating hammers used for different tasks include angularity of the hammering edge or plane and the extent of battering visible. Hammer stone categories include angular, angular/spherical, spherical, pointed, and disc. ' The four hammer stones found at CA-ORA-136 (Table 5) exhibit use which is characterized by the angular, spherical, and point types of hammer stones. 122 1 I 1 Table 5. Hammer Stones from CA-ORA-136. Catalog No. Type Material Length cm. Width cm. Thickness cm, Weight r. 9 Point/An . Quartzite 7.9 7.0 4.8 366.0 15 An ./S her. Quartzite 9.3 6.4 4.6 317.3 106 Angular Meta-Sed. 5.8 4.4 2.3 59.33 93 Spherical Meta -Vol. 7.5 4.3 3.8 188.2 The first hammer stone (Cat.# 9), is a combination point and angular hammer made on a split cobble of quartzite. The tool has two working ends: one is the point formed by the natural shape of the stone, and the other on an arris with an approximate angle of 30' formed by the sectioning of the cobble at the opposite end. Battering and crushing resulting in the removal of cortex is evident on the point end, while battering and crushing along with flake detachment scars are apparent at the opposite end. The angular working end is attributed to the production and maintenance of ground stone while the point end could have been used on ground stone or possibly core production. This specimen was recovered in Unit #11 at a depth of 80-90cm. A combination angular/spherical hammer stone (Cat.# 15) was unearthed in Feature #1, Unit 43 at 80-90cm. This hammer is made from an angular cobble of quartzite. Several arrises exhibited use resulting in light battering, rounding, and on arrises, faceting. It is likely that these areas were used in chipped stone tool production. One angular edge exhibiting crushing and minute flake detachment scars is overlapped by spherical hammer damage. This indicates the tool was used to perhaps work ground stone previous to is use as a knapping (stone chipping) instrument. It is often the case in many archaeological sites that exhausted core and core fragments are used as hammer stones. An angular hammer stone (Cat. #106) made of meta -sedimentary stone was recovered during the surface collection (Item #87). One edge of the tool exhibited battering and crushing. Though this hammer is smaller that the others in the collection, it can still be used for working of ground stone tools. Also recovered during the surface collection (Item #89) was a spherical hammer stone (Cat. #93) that was also used as a scraper. The tool is made from a split cobble of meta -volcanic stone. Hammering use damage is apparent on both ends of the piece, but one end was used much more than the other. Faceting with little battering damage occurs on the ends, while striations lead up to these contact areas. Both ends were used in knapping activities. One side of the piece showed evidence of scraping tasks, where the edge was rounded with micro -scarring, and has an area of polish leading to the working end, indicating possible use on a hard wood. In previous excavations the PCAS unearthed eight complete and seven fragmentary hammer ' stones (Table 2). These hammer stones are similar in .type, material, size, and therefor function as the four recovered in this excavation. ' Projectile Points And Bifaces Two identifiable projectile points and one biface fragment were recovered during the excavation ' of ORA-136 (Figure 4). The projectile points are both classed as dart points by virtue of their techno-morphologic features, as well as their weight (Fenenga 1953). Using Thomas' (1981) scheme for point typologies, the first point (Cat. #226) would be classified as a Pinto Series, and the other (Cat. #48) an indeterminate Leaf type point. The one temporally diagnostic projectile point (the Pinto) covers various time spans with varying Vl •, s Cat# 226 � Cat# 48 0 1 2 3 4 5 Centimeters Figure 4. Projectile Points from CA-ORA-136. degrees of chronological sensitivity. The most recent research conducted by Schroth (1994) indicates that Pinto points span the entire period of time in which the dart and atlatl hunting system was in use. This is due to the fact that Pinto points are a product of point rejuvenation (Flenniken and Raymond 1986, Flenniken and Wilke 1989, Schroth 1994) and raw material limitations (Schroth 1994). This means that using Pinto points as chronological markers at best can only delineate dart and atlatl times from bow and arrow times (beginning around AD350). Patterns of point manufacture and use life are most evident in the debitage and in flake scars and other attributes left on the points themselves. These patterns demonstrate the means by which raw lithic material was utilized for the production of particular tools. The pattern of manufacture evident from the projectile points recovered from ORA-136 is typical of the Milling Stone Period in southern California. Flakes driven off of bifacial cores as well as bifaces themselves were used as the blanks for points. Minimal thinning on the ventral side of a flake which is made into H4646 ioz 0 24 a point is common, this reduces the amount of work necessary create the tool Both points from ' the site exhibit this feature. The Pinto point was recovered in Unit #9 at 0-10cm. and is made of Monterey chert. This point ' exhibits loosely transverse parallel flaking, with slight chevron flaking at the distal end. Chevron flaking was found by Schroth (1994) to be indicative of point rejuvenation, and common to Pinto points. The projectile only has one barb (with a wide notch opening index). Points like these ' were classified by Harrington (1957) as Pinto single shouldered. A steep angled, short traveling flake scar is present were the other barb should be. This is usually due to damage accrued while the point is in use. This fact, combined with the chevron flaking, indicates that the point has t been used, rejuvenated, and deemed undesirable (probably due to its asymmetry and lack of good barbs) by its user who presumably discarded it at the site. ' The other point (Cat. #48), is made of meta -volcanic stone and has a tip flute -style impact fracture indicating that the point was damaged during use (Titmus and Woods 1986). The presence of the tip flute along with the overall damaged appearance of the point indicate that it has gone through at least one in -haft use life, and like the other, was discarded due to its undesirable characteristics. The biface fragment is made of Monterey chert and was found in Unit #4 at 20-30cm. The piece has three sides: the biface margin and two breaks, the first a natural check break, and the other a ' bending fracture. The bending fracture may have incited the break along the natural crack. The majority of bending and perverse fractures on bifaces appear to be due to manufacturing error (Titmus and Woods 1986). Thus, bifaces broken during manufacture would be deposited in the ' area where they were made ' Debitage Analysis 780 pieces of manufacturing debris were recovered from the site. 366 (46.9%) of these were of t Monterey chert, 189 (24.23%) quartz, 94 (12.1%) were meta -sedimentary (Tables 6 & 7). Chalcedony, quartzite, jasper, and meta -volcanic stone are also present. Six pieces of obsidian (0.77%) were also recovered. Monterey chert makes up the majority of the debitage due to the sites location near and around outcrops of the Monterey formation. Chert in this formation is found in bands and nodules.. ' All stages of lithic tool manufacture are present in the debitage sample: decortication of raw material, core production, forming a tool blank, forming a preform, final tool production, and tool ' rejuvenation. This is evidenced by the percentage of completely cortical and partially cortical flakes (5.5%) (indicating that decortication of the raw material was occurring on site, though not in a great amount), non -cortical (26.9%), and bifacial reduction (26.9%) flakes, indicating tool production. ' The number of bifacial pressure flakes (early pressure=21, late pressure=9) show that final tool manufacture occurred on the site. Several of the 18 bifacial alternate flakes were pressure induced. This indicates that the rejuvenation of broken tools also occurred here. Note that the shatter and M�• 1 25 flake fragment categories comprise the bulk of the sample, 34.7% and 35.8% respectively. Shatter and Flake Fragments will be the largest categories in any lithic reduction sequence, particularly in materials such as Monterey chert (ibid.). The high percentage of bifacial reduction detritus, along with larger size pressure flakes (pressure flakes usually wider than 0.5mm. in this region). Tool production via bifacial reduction was the predominate lithic reduction method employed in the New World from the Paleo-Indian period starting around 10,000 to 12,000 BP, up to the Late Prehistoric, which started around 1500 BP. The bifacial reduction method found in this assemblage is typical of other lithic assemblages found in Archaic and Milling Stone sites throughout California and the Great Basin. Ground Stone Tools Ground stone tools are most often related to the milling, crushing, and processing of seeds, acorns, various nuts, and small game. Tools of this type are identified by the development of wear patterns created through the process of abrading stone on stone. The repeated use of these tools often results in the surface of the stone becoming smoothed and/or polished (Schroth 1994). When a grinding surface becomes too smooth, it may be necessary to peck or sharpen the surface in order to make the grinding possible again. Tools are often flaked, pecked, and ground into specific desirable shapes, and consequently, ground stone tools may be identified through the occurrence of one or more attributes, including the presence of ground and smooth surfaces, pecked surfaces, and the shaping of the surrounding edges of the individual tool. These types of tools are most often associated with the processing of vegetable matter, although ethnographic records indicate that bone, clay for pottery, and pigments for paint were also processed with these tools (Gayton 1929; Korea 1925; Sparkman 1908; Spier 1978). As pestles and mortars are absent from the collection in question the grinding implements were separated into two groups, manos and metates, instead of four. It should be noted that manos and metates are actually a complex tool having two primary parts (Schroth 1994). The attributes selected for the description and discussion of the following ground stone implements are those which readily lend themselves to regional comparison with related artifacts rather than the manufacture of the artifact type. Manos Manos make up the hand held fraction of the mano/metate tool complex. The attributes which are of concern to the identification and classification of manos include lithic material, cobble or shaped form, number of ground surfaces (bifacial or unifacial), outline, cross section, and any other modifications such as the development of damage on either end of the mano from the M�i foz . 26 Table 6. Quantities of Debitage by Type and Material. UII�.I 170 180 21i 220 170 206 322 '323 TOTAtS us 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 1 105 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 • 07' 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 7 l 1 0 2 1 12 712 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 114 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 116 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 4 120 1 0 4 0 I 0 2 2 10 ". 2I 8 0 41 8 4 0 is 6 82 2 0 13 0 1 0 4 0 20 1?h, 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 6 6 0 19 0 1 1 3 2 32 81„ 2 1 13 0 1 0 2 0 19 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 133 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 t $ 3 0 6 0 2 0 1 0 12 1 Q 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 i 0 2 18 1 1 0 0 0 22 138 1 1 7 0 0 0 0 1 10 9 2 0 9 2 1 0 2 1 17 .°44Q 109 0 113 9 19 2 18 0 270 41 1 0 7 0 0 1 1 1 11 43x 52 1 138 17 33 0 1 45 10 1 296 9, 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 l 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 "18 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 ',►, 192 6 409 40 65 5 99 24 840 pecking of opposing ground surfaces. The overall form of the mano may indicate the type of metate used in conjunction with the mano. Shaping of an individual item such as a mano may also indicate longer periods of occupation or the preference of one material type verses another for grinding implements. Previous excavations at CA-ORA-136 shed very little light on the presence of any type of ground stone complex. Excavations carried out in 1965 by the PCAS uncovered only 14 fragmentary pieces of various unidentifiable ground stone implements, the majority being of schist (Chace 1966). No whole milling implements were recovered and none of the fragments were analyzed. I- M%I�i'f%6 - 27 I Table 7. Percent of Debitage by Type and Material. 064, ! tTa 180 212 2�b 216 288 „ SO - na 'tOTA1.$ 103 0.00% 0.00% 0.12% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.12% 105 0.00% 0.00% 0.12% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.12% 107 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.12% 0.00% 0.12% i10 0.00% 0.00% 0.12% 0.12% 0.00% 0.00% 0.120/6 0.00% 0.36% 111 0.00% 0.00% 0.83% 0.12% 0.12% 0.00% 0.24% 0.12% 1.43% 112 0.12% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.12% 114 0.24'/6 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.24'/6 116 0.120/6 0.00% 0.240/6 1 0.12% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.48% 120 0.12% 0.00% 0.48% 1 0.00% 0.12% 0.00% 0.240/6 0.24% 1.19% 121 0.95% 0.00% 4.88% 0.95% 0.48% 0.00% 1.79% 0.71% 9.76% 122 0.240/6 0.00% 1.55% 0.00% 0.12% 0.00% 0.48% 0.00% 2.38% 124 0.00% 0.00% 0.48% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.240% 0.00% 0.71% 123 0.71% 0.00% 2.26% 0.00% 0.12% 1 0.12% 0.360% 0.24% 3.81% ial 0.240/. 0.12% 1.55% 0.00% 0.12% 0.00% 0.240/6 1 0.00% 2.26% 132 0.00°/o 0.00% 0.240/. 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.24% I 0.00% 0.00% 0.12% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.12% 135 0.36% 0.00% 0.71% 0.00% 0.240/6 0.00% 0.12% 0.00% 1.43% 136 0.00% 0.12% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.12% 137 0.00% 0.240/. 2.140/6 0.12% 0.120/6 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 2.62% 138 0.12% 0.12% 0.83% 0.00% 1 0.000/6 0.00% 1 0.00% 0.12% 1.19% 139 0.240% 0.00% 1.07% 0.24% 0.12% 0.00% 0.24% 0.12% 2.02% 140 12.98 % 0.00% 13.45% 1.07% 2.260/6 0.24% 2.140/6 0.00% 32.14% 141 0.12% 0.00% 1 0.83% 0.00% 0.00% 0.12% 0.12% 0.12% 1.31% 143 6.19% 0.120/6 16.43% 2.02% 3.93% 0.00% 5.360% 1.19% 35.24% 149 0.00% 0.00% 0.12% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.12% 160 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.12% 0.00% 0.00% 0.12% 2 0.12% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.12% Ei66 0.00% 0.00% 0.12% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.12% Tr}TALO 22.860/6 0.71% 48.69% 4.76% 7.740/. 0.60% 11.79% 1 2.86% 100.00% Phase II investigations by Macko Inc. have uncovered two whole and six fragmentary manos falling into various categories. Although several different mano types exist, only five are represented at CA-ORA-136 (Table 8). All manos and fragments are marked by both polish and various degrees of convexity. The majority of the manos are large, and the shapes present indicate that no one type predominates the collection. Two of the manos (Cat. #10, Cat. #84) appear to be shaped into a bifacial, oval/plano convex design with all edges ground smooth. Both shaped manos are of granite. The remaining manos and mano fragments vary in form including one (Cat. #6), a quartzite mano, showing end battering on both ends of the artifact but 1 M4646 Imo• WJ ' no signs of shaping. The overall curvature of the ground faces tends to be only slightly convex or tflat with heavy striations, and some of the manos show evidence of heat damage. Metates ' Ethnographic literature indicates that the Luiseno, neighbors to the Gabrielino, utilized metates for the processing of small fauna as well as plant materials (Sparkman 1908). Robert Yohe et al. (1991) recently demonstrated the presence of small fauna blood residue on ground stone implements in both the California desert and coastal regions with blood -protein residue analysis. The basin type of metates may also be important in determining the vegetable matter generally processed by each particular metate form (Schroth 1994). Kowta (1969) suggests that flat slabs may be used to process fibers, shallow basins for processing hard seeds, and deep basins for more fatty products. Artifacts identified as either metates or metate fragments were classified on the basis of the presence or absence of a minimum of one concave surface. While only block metates are present ' at CA-ORA-136, there may have been fragments of slab metates in the previous collection, although this is doubtful. The collection excavated by Macko Inc. is represented only by large ' block metate fragments, and no whole specimens are present (Table 9). The metates represented at CA-ORA-136 are either shallow basin or flat in form with some ' exhibiting minor pecking around the base. All examples are unifacial in form or undifferentiated due to their fragmentary nature. The majority of metate fragments, although they retain one concave surface, are too fractional to identify and thus are listed as undifferentiated. ' Ground Stone Summary ' Based on ground stone tool quantities and characteristics (such as tool curation), activities requiring the use of ground stone played a dominant role at the site. Complete and fragmentary manos and metates were recovered, some showing extensive use and curation. No mortars or ' pestles were recovered. The majority of the manor are large, most likely indicating use on grains, nuts or small game in ' conjunction with a larger metate, rather than those used to process pigments. Most are also large, and the shapes present indicate that no one type dominates the site, although this determination is speculative due to the small sample size. The shaping and curation of some of the manos may indicate long term occupation or preference of material types. The overall curvature of the ground faces tends to be only slightly convex or flat, with heavy striations also suggesting long ' term use and/or curation of some of the manos. A number of the manos also show evidence of 1 M 29 I 11 1' 1 1 I Table 8. Attributes of Manos from CA-ORA-136 . Artifact Attribute Cobble U 't. Cobble liifacial Shaped Bifacial Unknown Unkno Totals, Lithic material: Granitic 3 2 1 6 Quartzite 1 1 Sandstone I 1 Form Outtine/Cross-section) Irregular/Triangular I 1 Oval/Plano-convex 2 2 Unknown/Oval 4 4 Unknown/Unknown 1 1 Curvature of Primary Used Face Flat 1 1 2 Slight 1 1 2 2 - 2 —Regular Unknown 1 - 1 2 Curvature of Secondary Used Face Flat - 1 1 - 2 Slight - 1 - 1 - - 1 1 —Regular Peaked - 2 - 2 Unknown N/A 1 2 Totals 1 4 2 1 8 heat damage, which may be indicative of gleaning from other sites or the use of broken manos for fire hearths or rock lined ovens. The overall form of each metate is most likely representative of the use of advantageously shaped, locally available blocks of sandstone. The collection excavated by Macko, Inc. is represented only by large block metate fragments and no whole specimens are present, which may once again suggest long term occupation, as block metates are effectively too heavy to be considered as a portable tool. Trade And Raw Material All the lithic material utilized at ORA-136 is locally available except for the obsidian. Quartz, quartzite, meta-volcanics originating from the Santiago Peak Formation (Fife 1967), meta - sediments originating from the Bedford Canyon Formation, and granite can be procured in creekbeds and major drainages, while Monterey chert and chalcedony can be procured all along I` Mkt, fs,%c- U11 the coast in outcrops of the Monterey Formation. Thirty nine of the 840 debitage specimens exhibited cortex. Most of these pieces were of Monterey chert. Cortex indicative of water transportation (incipient cone cortex) made up the majority of these specimens (n=21). Eleven pieces exhibited geologic cortex, and seven exhibited weathered cortex. Sandstone can be obtained near by in the San Joaquin Hills from exposures of the Topanga Formation. The only material recovered from the excavations that was traded into the area was obsidian. As expected for material traded from great distance, the obsidian debitage suggests that only finished tools or preforms were traded into the area. This is suggested by the presence of noncortical, edge, and pressure flakes, indicating edge modification, tool rejuvenation, and final production. There is an absence of decortication and other primary flakes. Upon visual inspection, the obsidian in this assemblage appears to be from the Coso Range, Inyo County, California. This trade pattern for obsidian is typical for the Milling Stone Period. While sourcing on the basis of visual characteristics is generally a less than optimal technique, this source does happen to be visually distinctive and relatively easy to accurately differentiate. No obsidian in our sample came from more exotic sources. In coastal southern California, Ericson (1970, 1777, 1994) has suggested that there was a decline in the trade of Mono Basin -Long Valley-Coso obsidian and a concomitant increase in the frequency of Obsidian Butte obsidian beginning after 2000 BP and extending through the Late Prehistoric Period. For example, Obsidian Butte is the source of all known obsidian Cottonwood Series projectile points (Ericson 1994, 1989). Lithic Summary The lithic technology employed at the site is typical of southern California lithic industries in the Milling Stone Period. Extensively using locally available materials, the prehistoric people of CA-ORA-136 utilized bifacial core reduction techniques to maximize usable flake yields for chipped stone tools. Cores were extracted and primarily decorticated at the quarry locations, then brought back to the site for further core preparation, and eventually tool production. Chipped stone tools were recovered from both this excavation and from past work by the PCAS. Two complete projectile points, one Pinto point and one Leaf style point, were recovered. Past work produced two complete points and 11 fragmentary ones. All of the identifiable points appear to by Leaf style points except for two Pinto type points. This brings the total point types for CA-ORA-136 to a minimum of two Pinto points and five Leaf types. One biface fragment was recovered from the site. This artifact along with some fragmentary projectiles recovered in previous work attest to projectile point and bifacial tool manufacturing on site. This is because the patterns of breakage on the biface is consistent with those occurring during manufacturing, not use. The recovered projectile points exhibit extensive rejuvenation and damage accrued during use, indicating on site rehafting activities. I i MAi 31 Table 9. Attributes of Metates From CA-ORA-136. Block Unifaeial Unknown . Unknown Total Lithic Material Sandstone 3 5 8 Quartzite 1 - 1 Shaping Yes 2 2 Pecked 2 2 No 1 1 2 Unknown 1 4 5 Pecked Basin Yes 2 1 3 No 1 - 1 Unknown 1 4 5 Basin Type Plat 2 3 5 Shallow 2 2 Unknown 2 2 TOTALS 4 5 9 The four hammer stones recovered were pointed, angular, spherical or a combination of the previous. The presence of these various hammer types indicates that both chipped stone tool production, core production and reduction, and ground stone retouch and manufacturing all occurred on the site. Historic Artifacts Historic artifacts are associated with the activities of populations after the arrival of Europeans. A wide range of activities may be reflected in the presence of these artifacts and analysis can provide information on original usage as well as disturbance of earlier archaeological deposits. Of the 23 historical artifacts collected (Table 10), two of the metal fragments are Duplex Head nails (#245, #246), while one is a snipped length of 3/16" copper wire (#264). The remaining metal Table 10. Historic Artifacts. 01401 L TOp LOM t MAT. ' Sit OMAN 1' 10 Glass 6 3 30 4Q:...... Metal .......... 8t. ....... 10 ......... 20' et�l .......................1. 8' ..2Q ................ 3Q....Metal. ......... ..... ..... ..1 ......... 8' 3 AQ '—Rqlql5 8;.............4.0 ..... �`4........Metal ....... ................... `�. 8 0 60' M t01 „110,,,,,,,,,,,,,,120e , Glass ,,,,,, TOTAL 23 Mom, 14,9,6. 32 - M/\/\ fragments appear to be various small gauge wires, some with insulation remaining. The glass recovered was all either green or clear, relatively thin -walled bottle fragments, probably 1950's or 1960's soda bottles. Discussion Archaeological investigations conducted at CA-ORA-136 recovered several diagnostic artifacts and ecofacts which lead to particular conclusions about occupational history and site function. Many aspects of the assemblage seem to indicate a prolonged or repeated occupation of the site. The recovered projectile points (one Pinto series, one Leaf style) exhibit extensive rejuvenation and damage accrued during use, yet they were deposited on the site. This indicates that the points were brought back to the site, either in haft or in game, then discarded for new, more favorably shaped, projectile points (i.e. rehafting activities). The presence of a biface fragment and projectile point fragments found during previous excavation, which were broken during manufacture, indicate the production of stone tools on site. Activities requiring the use of ground stone played an important role at the site based on ground stone tool quantities and characteristics (such as tool curation). Complete and fragmentary manos and metates were recovered, some showing extensive use and curation. No mortars or pestles were found. The manos varied in size, morphological type, and amount of curatorial effort invested. Metates were block type metates with flat to shallow basins. Curation of ground stone implements like manos, along with the block style metates, is indicative of less transitory occupation and prolonged site usage. Four hammer stones used in the production of chipped stone tools and the manufacturing and maintenance of ground stone tools were recovered. These tools, along with those of previous excavations may be used as further evidence for extended seasonal occupation. The presence of a fire hearth feature at 90cm. may also indicate a prolonged occupation. Due to the disturbed nature of the soil, however, feature integrity is compromised. Thus it is impossible to determine what is absent (charcoal lenses, artifacts, etc.) from the feature, making interpretations of feature function and span of use impossible. The sparse nature of the faunal assemblage seems to conflict with the extended occupation theory however. The vertebrate remains were attributed mostly to natural sources based on low frequency of occurrence and lack of burning or other bone processing. Those remains that were not identified as natural consisted mainly of fish species. The presence of fish in the collection is congruent with evidence from other local coastal sites, but the low quantity of invertebrates (shellfish) is peculiar: particularly with the site located in such close proximity to exploitable marine environments. Mkt, I rc . 33 AW ' The invertebrates that were recovered indicate a predominance of bay/estuary exploitation, with ' rocky coast use as a secondary source. Of the two fish species identified, the ray is found in the bay/estuary environment and the sheephead in the rocky coast. ' The projectiles recovered from the site are clearly dart points of the Pinto and Leaf types. Dart points go out of use with the introduction of the bow and arrow hunting system at the on set of the Late Prehistoric Period. As well, analysis of recovered debitage indicates a strict reliance on ' bifacial reduction strategies, predominate throughout the Milling Stone Period before the change in lithic strategies dictated by the use of the bow and arrow. Given the extensive nature of disturbance at CA-ORA-136, stratagraphic analysis to reveal occupational episodes, culture changes over time, and technological changes is impossible. this is due to years of agricultural use, and recent development of the area. I 1 I I u 1 I Given the current evidence, it is most likely that the site was seasonally occupied (possibly during the fall, as suggested by the high proportion of marine remains) over some period of time during the Milling Stone Period. The presence of projectile points and ground stone indicate that both hunting and seed processing were occurring at the site. These two activities are common on many archaeology sites, particularly those with longer occupations, because hunting and seed processing have been shown to be primarily male and female dominated tasks. One bone tool fragment, possibly an awl, may suggest basket manufacture or repair on site, which is also considered a female dominated role. Though our current excavations did not recover any other tools, previous excavations by the PCAS recovered scrapers (one made from shell) and a tarring pebble (often used to apply asphaltum to the interior of baskets to make them watertight). The tarring pebble is further evidence of basketry on site, and scrapers are used for a variety of tasks on a varied materials. Both of these tool types are common in Prehistoric sites. HAd4a loz . 34 1 1, Recommendations ' The research potential of small, mixed, subsurface sites like CA-ORA-136 has been exhausted with the conclusion of this excavation, and it is not likely that additional investigation will yield further information. Therefore, no further archaeological investigations are recommended at this site. A qualified archaeologist should be present during earth -moving at the site, however, in order to evaluate any cultural resources that might be encountered during the course of work. The monitoring program will serve as the final mitigation for CA-ORA-136. Management Considerations Because of the possibility of buried cultural resource sites and/or artifacts within the Project Area, an archaeological monitoring plan is recommended. The following plan is proposed to outline procedures to follow to ensure protection and/or treatment of prehistoric and historic resources which may be buried within the soils of the project t area. Monitoring will be conducted in a manner that allows for daily decisions to cease monitoring in any given section if it is in the professional opinion of the Project Archaeologist, in consultation with the Project soils engineer, that no cultural resources can occur. The Monitoring Plan includes three tasks: 1. Attendance of the Project Archaeologist at pre -construction meetings to present the monitoring procedures to construction personnel and project managers, 2. On -site monitoring of project construction by the Project Archaeologist, or his designee, to ensure that no cultural resources are impacted by project construction. Potential impacts could involve buried cultural resources, if present, and 3. A report of monitoring procedures and findings. 35 ' Descriptions of each task and procedures to follow in the event that cultural resources are ' discovered are as follows: TASK 1: MEETINGS WITH CONTRACTOR AND CLIENT ' The Project Archaeologist will attend the pre -grade meeting and will be available to meet with the Contractor and/or the Project manager whenever necessary. ' TASK 2: CONSTRUCTION MONITORING ' Construction monitoring consists of a trained observer monitoring earth -moving activities looking for cultural resources including both prehistoric and historic archaeological sites, objects, or features such as structural remains, trash pits, etc. greater than 45 years in age. The designated archaeologist will attend the pre -grade meeting and explain the monitoring procedures to the t, Contractor. tIf Historic Resources are found, the following procedures will be implemented: 1. Earth -moving or grading within 20 feet of the discovery will be temporarily diverted. t2. If additional cultural material is exposed by grading, additional hand excavation will not ' be required unless the additional material represents a new kind of data not recovered during previous data recovery at that site. Such new data would consist of artifact classes and features not recovered during previous mitigation. Features may include hearths, cooking pits, and burials. Even if no additional hand excavation is required, the newly texposed material will be mapped and collected. 3. If human remains are encountered, procedures 1 and 2 will be followed after initially notifying the Orange County Sheriffs -Coroner. If the Coroner determines that the burials are Native American, a reburial plan will be formulated. TASK 3: REPORTS One report will be produced describing the results of archaeological monitoring. The archaeological report will describe any isolates found and the results of evaluations of sites discovered. If site impacts are mitigated through data recovery, data recovery results will be presented in a separate ' report as part of the contract amendment for data recovery. 1 MAI\ tReferences Cited Allen, Richard K. 1990 Common Intertidal Invertebrates of Southern California. Ginn Press, Needham Heights. Backus, Gerald J. 1989 The Marine Biology of Southern California. Occasional Papers of the Allan Hancock Foundation n.s. No. 7. University of California, Los Angeles. Bean, Lowell J. and Charles R. Smith 1978 Gabrielino. In Robert F. Heizer, ed., Vol. 8, California. Handbook of North American Indians, William C. Sturtevant, General editor. Washington, D. C.: Smithsonian Institution. Bickel, Polly McW. 1978 Changing Sea Level Along the California Coast: Anthropological Implications. The Journal of Anthropology 3(1):6-20. Boy Scouts of America 1953 1953 Jamboree Guide for Unit Leaders. New York: Boy Scouts of America. Boy Scouts of America 1953 Third National Jamboree, 1953, Boy Scouts of America [souvenir book]. New York: Boy Scouts of America Brown, Joan C. 1981 Archaeological Site Record Update: CA-ORA-136. On File at the UCLA Information Center, Los Angeles. Chase, Paul G. 1966 An Archaeological Survey of Two Upper Newport Bay Sites, Orange County, California. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 2. Clark, J. Desmond and Hiro Kurashina 1981 A Study of the World of a Modern Tanner in Ethiopia and Its Relevance for Archaeological Interpretation. Modern Material Culture: The Archaeology of Us, pp. 303-321. Academic Press, New York. Dickason,F. 1971 The Physical Environment of Orange County. Orange Count Planning Department, Santa Ana, California. 'i 37 ' Dorn, Ronald I. 1982 Cation -Ratio Dating: A New rock Varnish Age -Determination Technique. Quaternary Research, 20:49-74. ' Dorn, Ronald I., D. B. Bamforth, T. A. Cahill, J. C. Dohrenwend, B. D. Turrin, D. J. Donahue, A. J. T. Jull, A. Long, M. E. Macko, E. B. Wil, D. S. Whitley, and T. H. Zabel ' 1986 Cation -Ratio and Accelerator Radiocarbon Dating of Rock Varnish on Mojave Artifacts and Landforms. Science 231:830-833. Douglas, R. ' 1972 Archaeological Site Record Update: CA-ORA-136. On File at the UCLA Information Center, Los Angeles. Drover, Christopher E. 1975 Early Ceramics From Coastal Southern California. The Journal of California Anthropology 2(1):101-107. ' Elsasser, Albert B. ' 1978 Development of Regional Prehistoric Cultures. In California, edited by R. F. Heizer. Handbook of North American Indians 8:37-57. Ericson, Jonathon E. 1970 The Castaic Site, Castaic Reservoir, California. UCLA Archaeological Survey. 1977 Prehistoric Exchange Systems in California: The Results of Obsidian Dating and Tracing. PhD Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, UCLA 1989 Towards Flow -Specific Obsidian Hydration Rates: Coso Volcanic Field, Inyo County, California. Contributions of the UCArchaeological Research Facility, 48: 13-22. 1993 Prehistoric Exchange of Obsidian for Sites of the Irvine Coast Project: Results of source characterization and Obsidian Hydration Measurements. In The Keith Companies, The Newport Coast Archaeological Project, Newport Coast Settlement systems: Summary and Discussion. Vol. 11: Technical Appendices. Feder, Howard M., Charles H. Turner and Conrad Limbaugh 1974 Observations on Fishes Associated with Kelp Beds in Southern California. California Fish and Game, Fish Bulletin 160. ' Fenenga, Franklin 1953 The Weights of Chipped Stone Points: A Clue to Their Functions. Southwestern ' Journal of Anthropology 9(3):309-323. ' M(a(�i 38 ' Fife, D. L., M. A. Minch, and P. J. Crampton 1967 Late Jurassic Age of the Santiago Peak Volcanics, California: Geological Society of American Bulletin 78:299-304. J 1 Fitch, John E. 1972 Appendix. Fish Remains, Primarily Otoliths, from a Coastal Indian Midden (SLO-2) at Diablo Cove, San Luis Obispo County, California. In 9000 Years of Prehistory at Diablo Canyon, San Luis Obispo County, California by Robert S. Greenwood, pp. 99-120. San Luis Obispo County Archaeological Society, Occasional Paper 7. Flenniken, J. Jeffrey and Anan W. Raymond 1986 Morphological Projectile Point Typology: Replication Experimentation and Technological Analysis. American Antiquity 51(3):603-614. Flenniken, J. Jeffrey and P. J. Wilke 1989 Typology, Technology, and Chronology of Great Basin Dart Points. American Anthropologist 91(1):149-158. Gayton, A. H. 1929 Yokuts and Western Mono Pottery Making. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 24(3):239-251. Berkeley. Gifford, Edwin W. 1971 California Balanophagy. In R. F. Heizer and M. A. Whipple, The California Indians: a Source Book. Berkeley: University of California Press. Glassow, Michael A., Larry R. Wilcoxon, and Jon M. Erlandson 1985 Cultural and Environmental Change During the Early Period of Santa Barbara Channel Prehistory. In The Archaeology of Hunter -Gatherer Subsistence Economics in Coastal Environments, edited by J. Parkington and G. Bailey. Cambridge University Press (in press). Harrington, Mark Raymond 1957 A Pinto Site at Little Lake, California. Southwest Museum Paper No. 17. King, Chester 1981 The Evolution of Chumash Society: A Comparative Study of Artifacts Used in Social System Maintenance in the Santa Barbara Channel Region Before A.D. 1804. University of California, Davis: Department of Anthropology, Ph.D Dissertation. Mai 40.6 ' 39 Klug, Lisa P. and Henry C. Koerper 1991 The Bioenvironment: Vegetation. In The Keith Companies, Newport Coast Archaeological Project: Project Background and Research Design. Costa Mesa, ' California. Kowta, M ' 1969 The Sayles Complex: A Late Milling Stone Assemblage from Cajon Pass and the Ecological Implications of its Scraper Planes. Berkeley: University of California Publications in Anthropology 6. ' Koerper, Henry C. 1991 Chronology Building and Stylistic Artifacts Types. In Newport Coast ' Archaeological Project --Project Background and Research Design. Prepared for Coastal Community Builders, Newport Beach. The Keith Companies Archaeology Division, Costa Mesa. ' Koerper, Henry C., et. al. 1994 Arrow Projectile Point Types as Temporal Types: Evidence from Orange County. ' In Newport Coast Settlement Systems: Analysis and Discussion Vol. I, Appendix E. The Keith Companies, Costa Mesa, California. ' - Kroeber, Alfred L. 1925 Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 78. ' Moratto, Michael J. 1984 California Archaeology. New York: Academic Press. ' Munz, Philip A. and David D. Keck 1949 California Plant Communities. El Aliso 2:88-105, 199-202. ' Peterson, Mark L. 1994 Newport Coast Settlement Systems: Summary and Discussion. Vol. I. The Keith ' Companies, Costa Mesa, California. 1991 The Bioenviromnent: Invertebrate Fauna. Newport Coast Archaeological ' Project: Project Background and Research Design. The Keith Companies, Costa Mesa, California. Pritchard -Parker, M. and D. Reid 1992 A Replicative Experiment in Metate Reroughening: Pecking vs. Pounding. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for California Archaeology. ' Pasadena, California. 40 1 rz Rice, Glen and Marie Cottrell 1976 Report of Excavations at CA-ORA-111, Locus H. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 12(3). ' Ross, Lester A. 1970 ORA-190: a Descriptive Report of a Late Prehistoric Horizon Site in Orange County, California. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 6(2-3):1-135. Salls, Roy A. ' 1988 Prehistoric Fisheries of the California Bight. Ph. D. dissertation, Department, of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles. Schroth, A. B. 1989 Appendix E: Steatite Replicative Study. In Archaeological Data Recovery at Prehistoric Archaeological Site CA-FRE-64, by W. J. Wallace, A. Schroth, and P. ' DeBarros. California Department of Transportation, District 6, Fresno, California. t 1994 Appendix G: Description and Analysis Lithic Artifacts. In Archaeological Investigations at Five Sites on the Lower San Luis Rey River, San Diego County, California: Final Report, edited by Michael Moratto. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District. ' Slife, Margaret W. ' 1963 Streams to Aqueducts: The Development of the Orange County Water Supply. Unpublished Master's Thesis, California State University, Fullerton. Sparkman, Philip S. 1908 The Culture of the Luiseno Indians. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 8:187-234. Spire, R. F. G. 1978 Foothill Yokuts. In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, California, edited by R. F. Heizer, pp. 471-484. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. Stevenson, Robert E. and K. O. Emery 1958 Marshlands at Newport Bay, California. Los Angeles: University of Southern California Press. 1 Tan, Siang S. and William J. Edgington 1976 Geology and Engineering Geologic Aspects of the Laguna Beach Quadrangle, ' Orange County, California. California Division of Mines and Geology, Special Reports, 127. �� ' 41 I Thomas, D. H. 1981 How to Classify Projectile Points from Monitor Valley, Nevada. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 3:7-43. Titmus, Gene L. and James C. Woods 1986 An Experimental Study of projectile Point Fracture Patterns. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 8(1):37-49. Treganza, A. E., and L. L. Valdivia 1955 The Manufacture of Pecked and Ground Stone Artifacts: A Controlled Study. University of California Archaeological Survey Reports 32:19-29. True, Delbert L. 1966 Archaeological Differentiation of Shoshonean and Yuman Speaking Groups in Southern California. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles. Wallace, William J. 1955 A Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology. Southwestern Journal of Archaeology 11(3). 1978 Post -Pleistocene Archaeology. In California, edited by R. F. Heizer. Handbook of North American Indians. 8:25-36. Warren, Claude N. 1968 Cultural Tradition and Ecological Adaptation on the Southern California Coast. Eastern New Mexico University Contributions in Anthropology 1(3). Warren, C. N., M. M. Lyneis, and J. H. Cleland 1984 Overview for the Historic Preservation Plan, Fort Irwin, California. Ms. on file, Interagency Archaeological Services Division, National Park Service -Western Region, San Francisco. Wilgoren, Jodi 1993 Reprising'53 Revelry: 500 Local Boy Scouts Re-enact Events of Historic Jamboree. Los Angeles Times, Orange County Edition. 4/13/1993:B 12 Yerkes, Richard W. and P. Nick Kardulias 1993 Recent Developments in the Analysis of Lithic Artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Research 1(2): 89-119. ' M�� 42 Yerkes, R. F., T. H. McCuloh, J. E. Schoelhamer, and J. G. Vedder 1965 Geology of the Los Angeles Basin, California. U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper No. 420. Yohe, R. M., M. E. Newman, and J. S. Schneider 1991 Immunological Identification of Small -Mammal Proteins on Aboriginal Milling Equipment. American Antiquity 56(4):659-666. 1 '. M�i 1*%c. 43 "4646 14*z P APPENDIX A DATABASE FOR: Phase II Test Excavations at CA-ORA-136 Block 800 City of Newport.Beach Orange County, California Prepared By: Jeffrey S. Couch, Tracy A. Stropes, Kevin S. Buffington, William Hayden David D. Earle, and Michael E. Macko Submitted By: Macko, Inc. 20321 Irvine Avenue, Suite F-2 Santa Ana Heights, CA, 92707 Ph# 714.966-9022 Fax# 714.966.0923 Prepared For: Irvine Apartment Communities 550 Newport Center Drive Newport Beach, California 92660-7011 September 21, 1995 9=195 Page 12 "4e4a fq-lriz 0 APPENDIX B DATABASE CODEBOOK FOR: Phase II Test Excavations at CA-ORA-136 Block 800 City of Newport Beach Orange County, California Prepared By: Jeffrey S. Couch, Tracy A. Stropes, Kevin S. Buffington, William Hayden David D. Earle, and Michael E. Macko Submitted By: Macko, Inc. 20321 Irvine Avenue, Suite F-2 Santa Ana Heights, CA, 92707 Ph# 714.966-9022 Fax# 714.966.0923 Prepared For: Irvine Apartment Communities 550 Newport Center Drive Newport Beach, California 92660-7011 September 21, 1995 MN` M4646 1411106 0 Macko, Inc. Archaeologic Encoding System Code Book UTYP (Unit type) 00 2m x 2m Ol lm x lm 02 50cm x 50cm 03 20cm dia. 04 Point Prov. 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2m dia. lm dia. Backhoe Trench lm x 50cm Non -Grid Feature Sample Feature Sample Bulk Removal lmx2m 25cm x 25cm Point Provenience Monitoring 3m x 3m 2m x 2m lm x lm 24cm dia. lmx2m 3m x 3m 2mx3m 25cm dia. 4m x 4m 5m x 5m IOm x lOm Unknown Unit Size STYP (Screen Type) 00 No Screen 02 1/2-Inch 03 1/4-Inch 04 1/8-htch 05 1/16-Inch 07 1/40-Inch 08 <40-Mesh 09 > 2.Omm 10 1.Omm - 2.Omm 11 0.5mm - 1.Omm Revised,September 13, 1995 Controlled Excavation Controlled Excavation Controlled Excavation Controlled Excavation With Posthole Digger Point Provenience Data -Individually Mapped Suface Artifacts Surface Scraps ( lcm deep) Surface Scrape ( lcm deep) Lot of irregular size and shape located by centroid coordinates Irregular shape, size, or volume 50cm x 50cm Irregular size, shape, or volume (add comments) Controlled Excavation Controlled Excavation -- Column Sample Subsurface Monitoring Not Point Provenienced Mechanical Removal Mechanical Removal Mechanical Removal Bucket Auger Mechanical Removal Controlled Excavation Controlled Excavation Controlled Excavation with Posthole Digger Mechanical Removal Surface -Collection Grid Surface -Collection Grid e.g. Point Provenience 1/2-Inch Mesh Screen 1/4-Inch Mesh Screen 1/8-Inch Mesh Screen 1/16-Inch Mesh Screen 1/40-Inch Mesh Screen (used for light fraction flotation only) Less than 1/40-Inch Mesh Screen Greater than 2.0mnt hl 1 12 Unknown Screen Size FTYP (Feature Type) I burial `Burial' includes features such as human, bird, and mammal burials 2 structure Any structural feature such as an adobe, foundation, or cistern hearth pit bin (e.g. for storage) rock Cluster ash fens cremation no feature SPL (Sample Type) 000 Normal Recovery note- "normal recovery" or blank is usually appropriate 01 Column.Sample 02 Soil Sample 03 Pollen Sample 04 Radiocarbon Sample 05 Feature Matrix 06 Feature Overburden 07 Surrounding Matrix 08 Special Multipurpose Sample 09 Monitoring 10 Light Fraction Flotation sample >1/40-inch screen 11 Heavy Fraction Flotation sample 1116 12 Flotation Sample 13 Phosphate Sample 14 Phytolith 15 Lipid 16 Amino Acid 17 Coprolite (5001) 30 Haliotis Sample 31 Oxygen Isotope Sample 40 Feature Item Elevation From Datum 41 TRM Sample Thermal Remnant Magnetism Item from burnt -rock feature 42 Non -Feature Item Note elevation from datum 43 Feature Item Elevation recorded from surface 44 Feature Item Item not recorded on item lot card 45 Non -Feature Item Elevation Recorded from surface 94 Protocol Violated Item/Sample Unsuitable for analysis 95 Feature Item Not collected- data incomplete 96 Non -Feature Item Not collected- data incomplete 97 Feature Item Unable to locate- data incomplete 98 Non -Feature Item Unable to locate- data incomplete 99 Non -Item Article Unable to locate- data incomplete 100 Unknown Sample Type CLAS (Class Code) ' 0 Non -Cultural Material 1 Chipped Stone 2 Groundstone 3 Bone 4 Shell 5 Organics 6 Misc. Lithic 7 Fire Affected Rock ' 8 Historic 9 Ceramic 1 1 1 1 1 MAT (LITHIC material codes) 0001 Undifferentiated Lithic 0010 FossilUndif. 0011 Fossil Shell 0110 Andesite 0115 Sulfur 0116 Bornite 0120 Diorite 0130 Basalt 0140 Granite 0159 Gabbro 0160 Rhyolite 0165 Rosamond Rhyolite 0170 Quartz 0171 Quartz Crystal 0180 Obsidian 0191 Welded Tuff 0192 Diabase 0193 Gneiss 0200 White Clay/Kaolinite 0201 Chalk 0206 Serpentine 0210 Chert Undifferentiated 0211 Franciscan Chert 0212 Monterey Chert 0213 Calico Chert 0214 Piedra de Lumbra Chert 0220 Chalcedony 0221 Metachert 0230 Limestone 0240 Sandstone 0249 Siltstone 0251 Sandy Asphaltum 0252 Pure Asphaltum 0260 Shale 0261 Fused Shale 0262 Cherty Shale 0270 Quartzite 0280 Red Ochre / Hematite 0282 Yellow Ochre / Limonite 0285 Kramer Hills Jasper -Agate Note- Includes only Native Ceramics. Historic ceramics are in Class 8 0286 Jasper 0287 Marble 0288 Quartz Monzonite 0289 Iron / Magnetite 0290 Calcite 0300 Metamorphic Undifferentiated 0310 Quartz Schist 0311 Glaucophane Schist 0312 Mica Schist 0320 Slate 0321 Soapstone (Talc Schist) 0322 Metasedimentary 0323 Metavolcanic MAT (BONE material codes) #.1 CF #.2 ? #.3 AFF #.7 Small #.8 Medium #.9 Large 2000 Vertebrata 2001 Undiff. Fish 2005 Undiff. Avian 2007 Undiff. Mammal 2012 Pinniped Seal 2015 Callorhinus/Arctocephalus Fur Seal 2025 Human (Homo Sapiens) 2031 Undiff. Samll Mammal 2047 Undiff. Large Mammal 2050 Chondrichthyes Cartilaginous Fishes 2051 Elasmobranchii Sharks and Rays 2054 Heterodontus francisci Horn Shark 2055 Carcharodon suicedens 2056 Squatine californica Pacific Angel Shark 2068 Isurus oxyrinchus Bonito Shark 2070 Mustelus californicus Grey Smothhound Shark 2072 Triakidae Requiem Shark 2073 Triakis semifasciate Leopard Shark 2078 Galerrhinus zyopterus Soupfm 2081 Torpedo californica Electric Ray 2083 Rhinobatis productus Shovelnose Guitarfish 2084 Platyrhinoidis triseriata Thomback Guitarfish 2090 Myliobatidiformes Undiff. Ray 2093 Myliobatis californica Bat Ray 2101 Teleostei (Osteichthyes) Undiff. Bony Fishes 2102 Pisces 2103 Heterostoniata 2120 Clupeidae Herrings and Sardines 2122 Sardinops caeruieus (sagax) Pacific Sardine 2124 Leurethes tennis California Grunion 2169 Batrachoididae Undiff. Toad Fish 2170 Porichthys sp. Undiff. Midshipman 2171 Porichthys myriaster Specklefm Midshipman 4 I I 1 2192 2194 2195 2196 2202 2208 2209 2211 2225 2229 2236 2240 2252 2254 2255 2282 2290 2301 2302 2303 2304 2305 2306 2307 2308 2310 2311 2316 2318 2320 2322 2324 2325 2332 2336 2338 2340 2346 2347 2348 2353 2362 2366 2368 2396 2398 2410 2411 2413 2421 2422 2423 2424 2425 Atherinidae Atherinopsis affmis Atherinopsis califomiensis Stichaeidae Paralichthys californicus Hypsopsetta guttulata Pleuronichthys sp. Kyphosidae Sebastes sp. Sebastes goodei Sebastes miniatus Sebastes pinniger Sebastes umbrosus Sebastes macdonaldi Sebastes phillipsi Scorpaenichthys marmoratus Paralabrax cathmtus Atractoscion nobilis Seriphus politus Genyonemus lineatus Menticirrhus undulatus Roncador stearnsee Sciaenidae Umbrina roncador Embioticidae Cynoscion parvipinnus Cheilotrema saturnum Damalichthys vacca Embiotoca hacksoni Hypsurus caryi Hyperprosopon argenteum Phanerodon furcatus Hexagrammos decagrammus Medialuna califomiensis Chromis punctipinnus Sphyraena argentea Tmchurus symmetricus Semicossyphus pulcher Oxyjulis californica Ophiodon elongatus Paralabrax sp. Anisotremus davidsoni Scomberjaponicus Sarda chillenses Heterostichus rostratus Lampropeltis getulis Testudinidae Clemmys sp. Clemmys marmorata Serpentes (Ophidea) Crotalus sp. Colubridae Crotalidae Piluophis melanoeucus Silversides Top Smelt Jack Smelt Pricklebacks California Halibut Deamond Turbot Undiff. Turbot Sea Chubs Undiff. Rockfish Chilipepper Rasher (Vermillion Rockfish) Orange or Canary Rockfish Honeycomb Rockfish Mexican Rockfish Chameleon Rockfish Cabezon Kelp Bass White Seabass Queenfish White Croaker California Corbine Spotfm Croaker Croaker Yellowfm Croaker Serfperch Shortfin Corvina Black Croaker Pile Perch Black Sea Perch Rainbow Sea Perch Walleye Surfperch White Surfperch Kelp Greenling Halfmoon Blacksmith California Barracuda Jack Mackerel California Sheephead Senorita Lingcod Kelp or Sandbass Undiff: Sargo Pacific Mackerel Pacific Bonito Giant Kelpfish King Snake Undiff. Turtle Western Pond Turtle Undiff. Snake Rattlesnake Undiff. Rattlesnake Family Gopher Snake II F 1 1 t I 1 1 II 2431 Lassertilia Undiff. Lizard 2432 Phrynosome coronatum Homed Lizard 2433 Sceloporus sp. Fence Lizard 2440 Anum 2441 Bufonidae Undiff. FroglToad 2442 Ranidae 2443 Amphibia 2445 Scorpian 2501 Podiceps nigricollis Eared Grebe 2502 Podilymbus podiceps Pied -billed Grebe 2503 Acchmophorus occidentalis Wester Grebe 2505 Puffmus puffmus Manx Shearwater 2506 Puffmus •griseus Sooty Shearwater 2507 Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar 2508 Lams Delawarensis Ring -Billed Gull 2509 Cucephala Buffel Head Duck 2510 Recurvirostra americana American Avocet 2512 Anatidae Undiff. Duck 2513 Gavin arctica Artic Loon 2514 Gavin immer Common Loon 2515 Gavin Stellata Red -throated Loon 2516 Oxyura jamaicensis Ruddy Duck 2520 Chen sp. Goose 2521 Branta bemicla Brant 2524 Anas sp. Duck 2525 Anas crecca Green -winged Teal 2526 Anas acuta Pintail 2527 Anas Platyrhynchos Mallard 2528 Anas clypeata Northern Shoveler 2529 Anas cyanoptera Cinnamon Teal 2530 Anas streoera Gadwali 2531 Anas discors Blue -Winged Teal 2540 Pelicanus occidentalis Western Grebe 2541 Aythya americana Redhead 2542 Aythya affmis Lesser Scaup 2551 Fulica americana American Coot 2555 Accipitridae Hawks 2556 Buteo jamaicensis Red -Tailed Hawk 2557 Buteo lineatus Red -Shouldered Hawk 2558 Buteo sp. 2560 Falco sparverius American Kestrel 2565 Pandion haliaetus Osprey 2566 Chendytes extinct diving duck 2673 Columbidae Doves/Pigeons 2690 Athene cunicularia Burrowing Owl 2693 Tyto alba Common Barn Owl 2725 Passerformes Perching Birds 2730 Anas strepera Gadwell 2739 Corvus coral Common Raven 2804 Sorex ornatus Ornate Shrew 2805 Scapanus latimanus Broad -handed Mole 2806 Notiosorex Crawfordi Desert Shrew 2816 Leporidae Rabbits/Hares 2817 Lepus californicus Jackrabbit II I 2818 2819 2820 2822 2825 2828 2829 2841 2843 2849 2851 2856 2857 2858 2860 2862 2864 2875 2878 2885 2888 2889 2890 2891 2898 2903 2905 2906 2919 2920 2928 2992 2929 2936 2940 2945 2952 2954 2956 2958 2960 2999 Sylvilagus audubonii Sylvilagus bachmani Sylvilagus sp. Rodentia Ondatra zibethicus Sciuridae Spermophilus beecheyi Thomomys bottae Dipodomys sp. Dipodomys agilus Perognathus sp. Neotoma sp. Neotoma fuscipes Neotoma lepida Reithrodontomys megalotis Microtus califomica Peromyscus sp. Carnivore Canidae Urocyon cinereoargenteus Canis sp. Canis familiaris Canis latrans Canis lupus Procyon lotor Mustela frenate Taxideataxus Mephitis mephitis Felis rufus Felis domesticus Phocidae Ottariidae Phoca vitulina Artiodactyla Antilocapra americana Odocoileus sp. Bos taurus Ovis sp. Sus sp. Enhydralutris Cricetidae Undiff. Fossil MAT (SHELL material codes) 3000 Undiff. Shell 3001 Undiff. Shell + Gravels 3002 Unidentified Shell 3099 Sunum scopulosum 3100 Undiff. Gastropod ' 3102 Acanthina spirata 3105 Acmaea sp. 3106 Acmaea fenestrata ' 3107 Acmaea funiculata 3108 Acmaea mitra 1 Desert Cottontail Bnnch Rabbit Undiff. Rabbit Undiff. Rodents Muskrat Undiff. Squirrel California Ground Squirrel Pocket Gopher Undiff. Kangaroo Rats Agile Kangaroo Rat Undiff. Pocket Mice Undiff. Woodrats Dusky -footed Wood Rat Desert Wood Rat Western Harvest Mouse California Vole Undiff. Peromyscus (mouse) Undiff. Carnivores Undiff. Canids Gray Fox Undiff. Canis Domestic Dog Coyote Wolf Raccoon Long-tailed Weasel Badger Striped Skunk Bobcat Domestic Cat Hair or Earless Seals Undiff. Eared Seals Harbor Seal Even -toed Ungulate's Antelope Undiff. Deer Domestic Cow Undiff. Sheep Domestic Pig Sea Otter Cricetine Mouse (Faunal Analysis Only) 1 I 1 3109 Acmaea limatula 3121 Astraea undosa 3127 Bulla gouldiana 3128 Bursa californica 3130 Calliostoma sp. 3138 Cerithidea californius 3153 Conus californicus 3154 Crepidula sp. 3161 Cypraea spadica 3169 Ophilia insculpta 3174 Fussurella volcano 3175 Florimetis obesa 3176 Forreria belched 3178 Fusinus kobelti 3183 Haliotis sp. 3186 Haliotis cracherodii 3187 Haliotis fulgens 3188 Haliotis rufescens 3189 Haliotis corrugata 3193 Hipponix antiquatus 3195 Homalopoma sp. 3197 Homalopoma fenestrata 3210 Lischkeia cidaris 3211 Littorina sp. 3214 Lottia gigantea 3215 Lucapinella callomarginata 3218 Maxwellia gemma 3222 Mitra idae 3223 Mitrells sp. 3224 Hinnites multirugosus 3225 Nassarius sp. (norrisia norrisii) 3231 Ocenebra poulsoni 3235 Odostomia sp. 3238 Olivellabiplicata 3245 Polinices sp. 3247 Polinices draconis 3248 Polinices lewisii 3250 Jaton festivus (Pterpurpura festiva) 3258 Serpulorbis squamigerous 3262 Tegula sp. 3267 Thais sp. 3271 Thais lemellosa 3272 Trimusculas reticulatus 3274 Trivia sp. 3278 Turbonilla sp. 3287 Volvarinataeniolata 3289 Megathura crenulata 3290 Opalia funiculata 3291 Melampus olivaceus 3292 Neverita reclusianus 3293 Buccunum baeri 3340 Acmaea conus 3341 Turritella sp. 3400 Undiff. Pelecypod Black Abalone Red Abalone 1 1 1 1 i1 3405 Amantis callosa 3406 Amantis peruviana 3408 Chaceia ovoidea 3409 Chama pellucida 3410 Chione sp. 3411 Chione undatella 3412 Chione californiensis 3413 Chione fluctifraga 3421 Donax gouldii 3424 Epilucina califomica 3425 Glans subquadrata 3427 Hinnites multirugosus 3434 Macoma sp. 3436 Macoma nasuta 3437 Macoma recta 3438 Mactra californica 3440 Modiolus sp. 3441 Modiolus capax 3442 Mytilus sp. 3443 Mytilus califomianus 3444 Mytilus edulis 3446 Ostrea lurida 3449 Argopecten sp. 3458 Pododusmuscepio 3459 Protothaca sp. 3460 Protothaca laciniata 3461 Protothaca staminea 3463 Pseudochamaexogyra 3464 Chama pellucida 3465 Saxidomus nuttalli 3467 Semele decisa 3468 Semele rupicola 3469 Septifer bifurcatus 3472 Tagelus sp. 3473 Tagelus califomianus 3477 Telling idea 3478 Tellina carpenteri 3481 Tresus nuttalli 3482 Tivela stultorum 3483 Trachycardium quadregenerium 3486 Cardita carpenteri 3487 Heterodonax bimaculata 3488 Cardita laticostata 3495 Laevicardium elatum 3503 Strongylocentrotus purpuratus 3504 Cancer sp. 3505 Unidentified crustacea 3510 Chiton sp. 3511 Ischnochiton conspicuus 3516 Balanus sp. 3518 Balanus glandula 3520 Balanus tintinnabulum 3522 Tetraclita squamosa 3526 Land Snail California Mussel Bay Mussel Oyster Pecten Pismo clam Purple Sea Urchin Crab Barnacle J '1. I 3531 Dentalium sp. 3533 Crepipatella lingulata 3534 Crucibulum spinosum 3540 Starfish 3550 Sand Dollar 3616 Gooseneck Barnacle 3617 Acorn Barnacle 3620 Admete couthouyi 3633 Inidentified Balanus 3634 Echinoidea 3650 Coral 3999 Unidentified Fossil Shell MAT (ORGANIC material codes) 5000 Undif. . Organic 5001 Coprolite 5002 Bank 5014 Seed Pod 5015 Wood 5016 Resin (Mastick) 5018 Soil 5020 Fossilized Wood 5021 Wood (carbonized) 5022 Grass Stems 5023 Nutmeats 5024 Tubers 5025 Buds 5026 Fruit Flesh 5027 Unknown 5100 Charcoal 5200 Amaranthaceae 5201 Amaranthus sp. 5210 Chenopodiaceae 5211 Chenopidium sp. 5212 Atriplex sp. 5220 Fagaceae 5221 Quercus sp. 5230 Juglandaceae 5231 Juglans californica 5240 Labiateae 5241 Salvia sp. 5242 Salvia apiana 5243 Salvia clevelandii 5244 Salvia columbariae 5245 Salvia mellifera 5246 Salvia munzii 5250 Malvaceae 5251 ' Malacothamnus fasciculatis 5260 Polygonaceae 5261 Eriogonum fasciculatum 5262 Polygonum sp. 5270 Rosaceae 5271 Heteromeles arbutifolia 5272 Prunus sp. note- not used for seed material Amaranth Family Pigweed Goosefoot Family Goosefoot Saltbush Beech Family Oak Walnut Family California Black Walnut Mint Family Sage White Sage Chia Black Sage Mallow Family Lax -flowered Bushmallow Buckwheat Family Buckwheat Smartweed Rose Family Toyon Christmas Berry 10 '- I I 5273 Primus ilicifolia Holly -leaved Cherry 5274 Unident. Nutlet Fragments 5280 Anacardiaceae Sumac Family 5281 Rhus sp. Sumac 5282 Rims integrifolia Lemonade Berry 5283 Rims trilobata Squaw Bush 5284 Rims ovata Sugar Bush 5285 Rims laurina Laurel Sumac 5290 Poaceae (gramineae) Grass Family 5291 Pon. sp. Bluegrass 5292 Phalaris sp. Canary Grass- unidentified 5294 Festuca sp. Fescue 5295 Panicum sp. Panic Grass 5296 Hordeum sp. Barley 5297 Echinocloa sp. Barnyard Grass 5298 Elymus sp. Blue Wildrye 5300 Aisoceae Carpet -weed Family 5310 Asteraceae (compositae) Sunflower Family 5311 Hemizonia sp. Tarweed 5312 Hemizonia fisciculata Fascicled Tarweed 5313 Helianthus sp. Sunflower 5320 Brassicaceae (cruciferae) Mustard Family 5321 Cardia draba Hoary -cress 5322 Lepidium sp. Peppergrass 5323 Brassica sp. Mustard 5330 Leguminosae Legumes Pea Family 5331 Lotus scoparius Deerweed 5332 Trifolium sp. Clover 5340 Caprifoliaceae Elderberry Family 5341 Sambucus mexicana Blue Elderberry 5350 Solanaceae Nightshade Family 5360 Caryoplyllaceae Pink Family 5361 Silene sp. Catchfly 5362 Stellaria media Indian Carpetweed 5370 Portulacaceae Purslane Family 5371 Calandrinia ciliata Redmaids 5380 Poaceae Cultivated Grains 5381 Avena sativa Oat 5382 Hordeum vulgare Barley 5383 Triticum aestivum Wheat 5390 Plantaginaceae Plantain Family 5391 Plantago sp. Plantain 5400 Cucurbitaceae Squash Family 5401 Marah sp. Wild Cucumber 5410 Lauraceae Laurel Family 5411 Umbellariacalifomica California Laurel 5900 Identifiable note -but can't be identified by present means 5901 Unidentified Seed 5902 Undiff. Light Fraction charcoal +modem contamination �+ MAT (HISTORIC material codes) 0003 Glass 0004 Road Gravel 0005 Terra Cotta U 11 n 0007 Composite 0008 Wood ,• 0009 Porcelain 0010 Adobe 0253 Asphalt 0255 Concrete 6000 Fired Clay 6100 Historic Ceramic 7000 Plastic ' 7100 Tile 7101 Roofing Composite 7200 7400 Rubber Paper 7500 Leather 7600 Brick 8000 Metal 9000 Fabric MAT (CERAMIC material codes) 0001 Ceramic MAT (SCREW -UPS material codes) 9500 Unused Catalog Number 9550 Unused Item Number 9575 Unused Lot Number 9580 Unsorted Lot 9585 Unsorted Lot 9600 Item transferred 9650 Lot Materials Transferred 9700 Lot Materials Missing 9725 Matrix Missing 9750 Article Unable to Locate 9900 Lot Assigned 9975 SterileMacrobotanicalSample 9999 Sterile OBJl (CHIPPED STONE TOOLS Object I codes) Oil Biface 012 Tool Fragment 013 Proj. Point (Arrow) 048 Proj. Point (Dart) 049 Stone Pressure Bit 051 Preform 052 Blank 053 Knife •' 054 Unmodified Rock 055 Flake Knife 056 Utilized Flake Scraper ' 057 058 Utilized Flake Reamer 059 Scraper 060 Chopper r, 061 Angular Hammer 062 Retouched Flake Reburied note changes in comments note changes in comments no material code available Materials Discarded 12 I 063 Retouched Flake Scraper 064 Graver 065 Drill 066 Perforator 067 Spherical Hammer 068 Core/Core Frag. 069 Uni-Directional Core 070 Multi -Direction Core 071 Opposed Platform Core 072 Bifacial Core 073 Bi-Polar Core 074 Unifacial Core 075 Burin 076 Burin Spall 077 Quartz Crystal 078 Crescentic 079 Hammer Stone Spall 080 Bi-Polar Hammer 083 Abraded Stone 084 Core/Cobble Tool 086 Tarring Stone 087 Microblade 088 Microblade Core 089 Crested Blade 090 Platform Spall OBJI (DEBITAGE FORMS Object I codes) 100 Debitage Undifferentiated Undifferentiated Debitage 101 CC/Np Completely cortical flake with a natural or cortical platform. 102 Camp Completely cortical flake with a single -facet platform Includes diagnostic debitage of bulbar uniface production. 103 CC/Mfp Completely cortical flake with a multiple -facet platform. 104 CC/AbrMFP Completely cortical flake with a culturally abraded multiple facet platform. 105 CC/Pa Completely cortical flake with platform absent (can grade into debitage resulting from production of a bulbar uniface. 106 CC/Outr Completely cortical flake with an outrepasse termination. 107 CC/Edge Completely cortical flake with characteristics of an edge - preparation flake. 108 CC/Alt Completely cortical flake with characteristics of an alternate flake. 109 CC/Tesh Completely cortical flake with natural or cortical platform, with Teshua flake characteristics. 110 PC/Np Partially cortical flake with a natural or coritcal platform. III PC/Sfp Partially cortical flake with a single -facet platform; includes diagnostic debitage of bulbar uniface production. 112 PC/Mfp Partially cortical flake with a multiple -facet platform. 113 PC/AbrMFP Partially cortical flake with a culturally abraded multiple - facet platform. 13 114 PC/Pa Partially cortical flake with platform absent (can grade into ' biface-thinning with characteristics of an edge preparation flake, and also into debitage resulting from production of a bulbar uniface). 115 PC/Outr Partially cortical flake with an outrepasse termination. 116 PC/Edge Partially cortical flake with characteristics of an edge - preparation flake. 117 PC/Alt Partially cortical flake with characteristics of an alternate flake. ' 118 PC/Bulb Partially cortical flake with a bulb remnant from parent flake on the dorsal surface. 119 PC/Undul Partially cortical flake with dorsal surface consisting of an undulation from the distal end of original flake, outrepasse with cortex at distal end. 120 NC/Np Noncortical flake with a natural or cortical platform ( can include Topaz Mountain reduction flakes). ' 121 NC/Sfp Noncortical flake with a single -facet platform. 122 NC/Mfp Noncortical flake with a multiple -facet platform. 123 NC/AbrMFP Noncortical flake with a culturally abraded multiple -facet platform. 124 NC/Pa Noncortical flake with platform absent (can grade into biface- thinning with characteristics of an edge preparation flake, and ' also into debitage resulting from production of a bulbar uniface). 126 NC/Edge Noncortical flake with characteristics of an edge -preparation flake. 128 NC/Bulb Noncortical flake with a bulb remnant from parent flake on the dorsal surface. 129 NC/Undul Noncortical flake with dorsal surface consisting of an t undulation from the distal end of the original flake. 130 BR/Bulb Biface-thinning flake with a bulb remnant from the parent flake on its dorsal surface. 131 BR/Alt Biface-thinning flake with the characteristics of an alternate flake. 132 BR/Edge Biface-thinning flake with the characteristics of an edge - preparation flake. 133 BR/Marg Biface-thinning flake with the characteristics of a margin - removal flake. ' 134 135 BR/Outr BRBPerc Biface-thinning flake with an outrepasse termination. Biface-thinning flake resulting from early -stage percussion. 136 BR/LPerc Biface-thinning flake resulting from late -stage percussion. 137 BRBPres Biface-thinning flake resulting from early -stage pressure. ' 138 BR/LPres Biface-thinning flake resulting from late -stage pressure. 139 SHT/c Shatter with some cortex. 140 SHT/Nc Shatter with no cortex. 141 FF/Cc Flake fragment with some cortex. t 143 FF/Nc Flake fragment with no cortex. 144 Notch Notching flake from a bifacial preform (such as a projectile point). 145 Pot Potlid, expelled from the surface of stone by differential i' thermal (either cold or heat). 147 Pop Popout, or Janus flake, on bulb, resulting from bending of ' flake during detachment; appears to have bulb on both dorsal ' 14 and ventral surfaces; same platform as parent flake from which it was liberated. ' 148 Errail Errailure. 149 BP/Sec Bipolar section (orange peel, or quarter section). 150 BP/Sp Bipolar spall (strongly curved, thin flake with or without ' cortex). 151 BP/Sl Bipolar sliver, with compression or striations from opposite ends on one or both sides. 152 BP/f Bipolar reduction flake. ' 153 BP/c Bipolar core or remnant, or pieces esquilles. 154 TM/Icp Topaz Mountain technique, with incipient cone cortextual 155 TM/Gp platform. Topaz Mountain technique, with geologic cortextual platform. 156 TM/Ewp Topaz Mountain technique, with eroded or weathered platform. ' 157 TM/Pa Topaz Mountain technique, with the platform absent. 158 Trm Tested Raw material. 159 COR/shat Core shatter. OBJ1(GROUND STONE object 1 codes) 002 Bead / Ornament 009 Spindle Whorl / Ground Disk 010 Mano 014 Pelican Stone 021 Bead Blank 026 Cupules 027 Charmstone 028 Cogged Stone 029 Shaped Ground Stone 030 Incised / Grooved 031 Shallow Basin Metate 032 Mortar 033 Slab Metate 034 Abrader 035 Disoidal 036 Tarring Pebble 037 Gaming Stone 038 New Weight 039 Anvil 040 Spheroid 041 Pestle 043 Comal 044 Bowl 047 Applicator 087 Deep Basin Metate 088 Undiff. Groundstone 089 Tablet 090 Metate OBJ1 (BONE object 1 codes) 000 Not Indent. 001 Awl 002 Bead / Ornament 15 II 003 Bead production Waste 004 Barb 005 Fish Gorge 006 Whistle 009 Worked Bone 021 Bead Blank 040 Flaker 042 Needle OBJI (SHELL object 1 codes) 000 Not Ident. 002 Bead/ Ornament 003 Hinge / Apex 004 Barb 006 Whistle 007 Operculum 008 Fishhook 020 Worked Shell 021 Bead Blank OBJI (ORGANICS object I codes) 000 Not Ident. OBJI (MISC. LITHICS object 1 codes) 00 Not Ident. OBJI (BURNT ROCK object 1 codes) 00 Not Ident. Owl (HISTORIC object 1 codes) 01 Glass Marble 02 Bead 03 Grommet 04 Bullets, Shots, or Casings 05 Clay Pigeon 06 Nail 07 Metal Nut 08 Metal Bolt 09 Finish 10 Base 11 Bottle 12 Plate 13 Cup 14 Bowl 15 Fork 16 Light Bulb 17 Bottle Cork 18 Jar 19 Saucer 20 Planter or Planter Base 21 Neon Tubing 22 Dessert Cup/ Bowl 23 Handle 24 Creamer i I! I 1 t 25 Pad Lock 26 Bottle Stopper 27 Coin 28 Button 29 Bottle Top (crowned) 30 Key 31 Rock or Mineral 32 Pencil or Eraser 33 Slug OBJ1 (CERAMIC object 1 codes) 79 Pipe 80 Brownware 81 Buffware 92 Vessel 100 Effigy OBJ2 (AGE object 2 codes) 00 Undiff. O1 Infant 02 Juvenile 03 Sub -adult 04 Adult 05 Fetal OBJ2 (SIZE INTERVALS object 2 codes) 21 0-5mm 22 5-10mm 23 10-20mm 24 20-30mm 25 30-40mm 26 40-50mm 27 50-60mm 28 > 60mm 29 Not Size Sorted OBJ2 (SHELL BEADS object 2 codes) 30 Spire removed -flat 31 Spire removed -angle 32 Barrel 33 Cup (callus) 34 Cylinder (callus) 35 Thin lip -round 36 Thin lip -oval 37 Full lip 38 Wall disc 39 Rough disc 40 Chipped disc 41 Ground disc 42 Rectangular 43 Saddle 44 Tube 45 Cylinder 46 Spire 17 47 Bead Detritus 48 Cap 49 End Ground 50 Grooved Rectangle 60 Unid. Fragment 61 Irregular Disc OBJ2 (GLASS BEADS object 2 codes) 55 Copper Cane 56 Green Cane OBJ2 (FISHHOOKS object 2 codes) 70 Grooved/Notched Shank 71 Knobbed Shank 72 Simple Pointed Shank 73 Notched Pointed Shank 74 Perforated Shank 75 Simple Rounded Shank OBJ2 (BONE TOOLS (GIFFORD'S TYPES) object codes) 79 Production Waste 80 A or A? 81 Al or Al? 82 B or B? 83 B1 84 B2b 85 A4 or A4? 86 A4c 87 T or T? 88 TI or Tl? 89 T1borTIM 90 Tld 91 Tle 92 Tlf 93 T1gorTlg? 94 Tlh 95 T2c 96 T2b2 97 EElb 98 P or Q 99 U2 or U2? OBJ2 (GROUND STONE, face types, object 2 codes) 100 Flat 101 Convex 102 Flat / Flat 103 Flat / Convex 104 Convex / Convex 105 Flat / Flat / Flat 106 Flat / Flat / Convex 107 Flat / Convex / Convex 108 Convex / Convex / Convex MODI (modification codes) i8 O1 Burned / Charred 02 Battered (edge) 04 Weathered 07 Fused 08 Worn 14 Serrated 21 Pecked (surface) 29 =Drilled 30 Incised 31 Grooved 32 Ground 33 Polished 37 Ground and Polished 38 Punched 39 Calcined 45 Chipped 47 Abraded 52 Misc. Residue / Stained 53 Masick Residue 54 Asphaltum Coating 55 Gnawed 56 Heavy Damage (recent) 57 Striations 58 Pitted and Pecked 60 Impressed 61 Pitted 62 Perforated 63 Digested 64 Cut 65 Patinated 66 Sandblasted 67 Dorsal Grinding 68 Ventral Grinding 69 Faceted Grinding 70 Modified 74 Ochre Staining 91 Patterned Incised 92 Grooved 93 Utilitarian Incised MOD2 (modification 2 codes) 1 100% of item 2 >50% of item 1/2 3 >50% of item 1/4 5 Undiff. Fragment 6 >1/8" and <1/4" MOD3 (modification 3 codes) 01 Unifacial 02 Bifacial 03 Non -Cultural 04 Fragment 05 Distal 06 Medial 1 (Faunal Analysis Only) (Bead Analysis Only) (Incised Stone Analysis) (Incised Stone Analysis) (Incised Stone Analysis) (Unused code used in faunal only) 19 I 1 I Proximal Lateral Shaft Distal Shaft Proximal Shaft Condyle Epicandyle Epiphysis Central facial 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Tri 17 Tooth Root 18 Proximal Epiphysis 19 Distal Epiphysis 20 Ball 21 Quadrafacial 30 Straight 31 Conical 32 Biconical 33 Conical with biconical finish MOD4 (modification) (30-33 used to describe drilled holes) 00 None (Faunal) O1 Heat Affected (Faunal) 02 Charred (Faunal) 03 Calcined (Faunal) 04 Geologic Cortex 05 Weathered Cortex 06 Incipient Cone Cortex 07 Entire Circumference Pecked and Ground 08 One Edge Pecked or Ground 09 One End Pecked or Ground 20 Side Notched 21 Stemmed 22 Convergent Base 23 Convex Base 24 Straight Base 25 Concave Base 26 Single Notch 40 Comer Notched 41 Notched 42 Straight 43 Concave 44 Convex 45 Cottonwood Triangular 46 Desert Side Notched 47 Leaf 48 Rose Spring Cm. Notch 49 Rose Spring Side Notch 50 Sonoran 51 Elko Side Notched 52 Elko Corner Notched 53 Northern Side Notched 54 East Gate 55 Gypsum Cave El MOD4 (modification) (30-33 used to describe drilled holes) 00 None (Faunal) O1 Heat Affected (Faunal) 02 Charred (Faunal) 03 Calcined (Faunal) 04 Geologic Cortex 05 Weathered Cortex 06 Incipient Cone Cortex 07 Entire Circumference Pecked and Ground 08 One Edge Pecked or Ground 09 One End Pecked or Ground 20 Side Notched 21 Stemmed 22 Convergent Base 23 Convex Base 24 Straight Base 25 Concave Base 26 Single Notch 40 Comer Notched 41 Notched 42 Straight 43 Concave 44 Convex 45 Cottonwood Triangular 46 Desert Side Notched 47 Leaf 48 Rose Spring Cm. Notch 49 Rose Spring Side Notch 50 Sonoran 51 Elko Side Notched 52 Elko Corner Notched 53 Northern Side Notched 54 East Gate 55 Gypsum Cave El El 07 Proximal 08 Lateral 09 Shaft 10 Distal Shaft 11 Proximal Shaft 12 Condyle 13 Epicondyle 14 Epiphysis 15 Central 16 Trifacial 17 Tooth Root 18 Proximal Epiphysis 19 Distal Epiphysis 20 Ball 21 Quadrafacial 30 Straight 31 Conical 32 Biconical 33 Conical with biconical finish (30-33 used to describe drilled holes) MOD4 (modification) 00 None (Faunal) 01 Heat Affected (Faunal) 02 Charred (Faunal) 03 Calcined (Faunal) 04 Geologic Cortex 05 Weathered Cortex 06 Incipient Cone Cortex 07 Entire Circumference Pecked and Ground 08 One Edge Pecked or Ground 09 One End Pecked or Ground 20 Side Notched 21 Stemmed 22 Convergent Base 23 Convex Base 24 Straight Base 25 Concave Base 26 Single Notch 40 Corner Notched 41 Notched 42 Straight 43 Concave 44 Convex 45 Cottonwood Triangular 46 Desert Side Notched 47 Leaf 48 Rose Spring Cm. Notch 49 Rose Spring Side Notch 50 Sonoran 51 Elko Side Notched 52 Elko Comer Notched 53 Northern Side Notched 54 East Gate 55 Gypsum Cave 56 Humboldt 57 Pinto 58 Lake Mojave 59 Silver Lake 90 Lithic 91 Bone 92 Wood 93 Lithic and Bone 94 Lithic and Wood 95 Bone and Wood 96 Lithic, Bone and Wood 97 Not Identified ELE (element codes) 000 None Identified 001 Unidentifiable 005 Unidentified 010 Cartilage Oil Costal Cartilage 012 Intercostal Cartilage 100 Cranium 101 Skull Inc 102 Supraorbital 103 Lateral Orbit 104 Sphenoid 105 Parasphenoid 106 Ethmoid 107 Lacrimal 108 Squamosal 110 Frontal 115 Parietal 119 Occipital Condyle 120 Occipital 121 Basioccipital 122 Basispheroid 123 Jugal 130 Temporal 131 *Saeeita (Otolith) 135 Bulla (Tympanic Auditory) 149 Palatine 150 Maxilla 151 Premaxilla 152 Maxillae 153 Premaxillae 154 Premaxilla (2) 159 Temporalmandibular Fossa 160 Dentary 161 Right Mandibular Condyle 162 Mandible 163 Left Mandibular Condyle 170 Zygomatic 200 Tooth 201 Tooth Medial 207 Germ (Pending further analysis) 21 I_! ' 208 Lower Deciduous Incisor 209 210 Incisor Germ Incisor 211 Upper Incisor 212 Lower Incisor 213 Upper Incisor (1) ' 214 Upper Incisor (2) 215 Upper Incisor (3) 216 Upper Incisor (4) 217 Lower Incisor (1) 218 Lower Incisor (2) 219 Lower Incisor (3) ' 220 Lower Incisor (4) 231 Canine 232 Upper Canine (1) 233 Lower Canine (2) 234 Canine Germ 235 Lower Canine Germ 246 Lower Premolar Germ ' 247 Upper Premolar Germ (1) 248 Premolar Germ 249 Upper Premolar 250 Premolar 251 Upper Premolar (1) 252 Upper Premolar (2) 253 Upper Premolar (3) ' 254 Upper Premolar (4) 255 Lower Premolar (1) t 256 257 Lower Premolar (2) Lower Premolar (3) 258 Lower Premolar (4) 260 Deciduous Lower Premolar (3) ' 261 Deciduous Lower Premolar (4) 262 Deciduous Lower Molar (1) 269 Molar (3) 270 Molar ' 271 Upper Molar 272 Lower Moler ' 273 274 Upper Molar (1) Upper Molar (2) 275 Upper Molar (3) 276 Lower Molar (1) 277 Lower Molar (2) t 278 Lower Molar (3) 279 Molar Germ 280 Upper Cheek Tooth ' 281 Lower Cheek Tooth 282 Cheek Tooth 283 Lower Molar Germ t 284 Upper Molar Germ 300 Vertebra 311 Atlas Vertebra 312 Axis Vertebra t 320 Thoracic Vertebra 22 1 I 321 Thoracic (1) 322 Thoracic (2) 340 Lumbar 341 Lumber (1) 342 Lumbar (2) 343 Lumbar (3) 344 Lumbar (4) 345 Lumbar (5) 350 Rib 351 Rib (1) 355 Pleural Plate 370 Sternum 400 Scapula 410 Clavicle 419 Pelvic 420 Innominate 421 Ilium 423 Ischium 424 Pubis 425 Pygostyle 430 Sacrum 431 Sacral 432 Sacral (1) 450 Caudal Vertebra 500 Long Bone 510 Humerus 520 Radius 530 Ulna 535 Ulna -Radius 540 Femur 550 Tibia 555 Tibia -Fibula 560 Fibula 570 Patella 571 Articular 579 Distal Sesamoid 580 Sesamoid 581 Distal Phalange (1) 582 Distal Phalange (2) 583 Distal Phalange (3) 584 Distal Phalange (4) 585 Distal Phalange (5) 586 Middle Phalange (2) 587 Middle Phalange (3) 588 Middle Phalange (4) 589 Middle Phalange (5) 590 Epicondyle Femur 592 Proximal Phalange (5) 593 Proximal Phalange (4) 594 Proximal Phalange (3) 595 Proxiaml Phalange (1) 596 Proximal Phalange (2) 597 Proximal Phalange 598 Medial Phalange 23 II Distal Phalange Carpal Metacarpal / Tarsal Undiff. Phalanges Lunar Scaphoid Magnum Trapezoid Uniform Trapezoid -magnum Scapholunar Navicular / Scaphoid Cuneiform Capitate Pisiform Lessor Multangular Greater Multangular Triquetml Lunate Navicular Metacarpal Hamate Meatcarpal (2-4) Metacarpal (5) Metacarpal (1) Metacarpal (2) Metacarpal (3) Metacarpal (4) Metapodial Phalanx Proximal Phalanx Medial Phalanx Distal Phalanx Ectocuneiform Tarsal Calcareous Astragalus Cuboid Entocuneiform Mesocuneiform Mesectocuneiform Metatarsal Metatarsal (1) Metatarsal (2-4) Metatarsal (5) Metatarsal (2) Metatarsal (3) Metatarsal (4) ' Pedal Phalanx Proximal Pedal Phalanx Medial Pedal Phalanx Destal Pedal Phalanx Digit 2 Phalanx 1 Digit 2 Phalanx 2 Phalanx (1) Phalanx (2) (Ungual) - Phalanx (3) ' i 710 Antler ' 715 719 Metapodial Naviculo-cuboid 720 Plastron (bottom) 721 Carapace (top) ' 722 Peripheral Plate 723 • Neural Plate 724 Pygal Plate 725 Epiplastron ' 726 Hyoplastron 727 Hypoplastron 728 Entoplastron ' 738 Claw 750 Manubrium 751 Stemebra 760 Coracoid ' 761 Furcula 762 Carpometacarpus 765 Tibiotarsus t 766 Tarsometatarsus 768 Metatarsus 769 Synsacrum 770 Synsacral 771 Eggshell 772 Tarsal Phalanx 773 Turtle Shell ' 791 Fang 805 Fish Scale 806 830 Dermal Denticle Syncranium 831 Dentary (fish) 834 Ventral Pharyngeal ' 835 Pharyngeal 837 Jaw Element 840 Jaw Tooth 845 Pharyngeal Tooth ' 853 Thoracic Vertebra 854 Thiracic Vertebra (2) ' 850 855 Vertebra or Centrum Fish Caudal Fish 856 Penultimate 857 Ultimate Vertebra 858 Urostyle ' 859 Vertebral Spine 870 Caudal Sting (Rays) 871 Dorsal Spine ' 872 Spine 874 Fin Spine 875 Inferior Pharyngal ' 876 Superior Pharyngeal 877 Cartilage (ossified) 878 Fin Ray 879 Periotic ' 880 Limb Bone 25 890 Comu 891 Greater Comu 892 Tooth Root 894 Auxiliary Metapodial 900 Burrow Death 905 Claw Sheath 910 Auxiliary Destal Phalanx 914 Nasal 916 Palatine 918 Stemum 920 Quadrate SYM (symmetry codes) 1 Left / Top 2 Right / Bottom 3 Axial 4 Undetermined 5 Fused Left / Right 6 Anterior 7 Small 8 Medium 9 Large 0 Unidentifiable Non -Cultural Mo Ay Ab COMMISSIONERS a boCK Paz-) CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES ROLL CALL INDEX Department, and commended them for their years of service with the City of Newport Beach. Posting of the Agenda: Posting of the James Hewicker, Planning Director, stated thaty a Planning Commission Agenda Agenda was posted on Friday, March 31, 199�Y, in front of City Hall. Request for Continuance: Request for Director Hewicker stat that the applicant, Newport Harbor Nautical Cont. Museum, has reques d that Item No. 3, Use Permit No. 3551, property Item No.3 located on the s therly side of East Coast I�ighway between the Bay Bridge and side Drive, be continued to the May 4, 1995, Planning tion * /Conmunnissimeeting. made and voted on to continue Item No. 3, 1995, to the May es * * * * * ning Commission meeting. MOTION CARRIED. sent Tentative Map of Tract No. 15178 (Public Hearing) Item No.l Request to approve a tentative map involving the subdivision of a single TTMI5187 parcel of land into two numbered lots for 245 residential condominium units, one numbered lot for clubhouse/recreational purposes, one numbered Approved lot *for guard house purposes and two lettered lots for private drive purposes on property located in the Block 800 Planned Community. LOCATION: Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 136/22-23 (Resubdivision No. 612), located at 875 San Clemente Drive, on the southwesterly corner of San Clemente Drive and Santa Barbara Drive, in the Block 800 Planned Community -2- COMMISSIONERS MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL' CALL TTI I INDEX ZONE: P-C APPLICANT: Irvine Apartment Communities, L.P., Newport Beach OWNER: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach James Hewicker, Planning Director, pointed out that the subject map is a tentative map and not a vesting tentative map. He stated that the site plan that was distributed to the Planning Commission was to only inform the Planning Commission of the elevations of the proposed buildings inasmuch as the site planis not included in the public hearing. Don Webb, Public Work Director, addressed the following conditions in Exhibit "A". He recommended that Condition No. 10, be amended to state "That the private drive serving the development and the museum driveway be designed to line ap." The purpose for the amended condition would be that it would be less expensive and more beneficial ifthe museum driveway would be moved. Condition No. 14 be amended to state ."That Santa Maria shall be improved with curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting and pavement." He explained that because Santa Maria is a private street and a private easement that an encroachment permit would not be required. Condition No. 15 be amended to state "That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review by the City Traffic Engineer for compliance with City standards and policies. " Condition No. 32 be amended to state "That any Edison transformers serving the site be located outside the sight distance planes as described in City .Standard 110-L, unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department" The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and Mr. Rick Lambert, Vice President of Development for Irvine Apartment -3- COMMISSIONERS Viol - Mc Ay At CITY OF NEWPORT' BEACH MINUTES t G 1nnc ROLL CALL INDEX Communities, appeared before the Planning Commission. He concurred with the findings and conditions in Exhibit'W', as amended. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Brown, Mr. Lambert explained that the truck driveway off of Santa Barbara Drive would be used for garbage pickup and moving vans. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed at this time. tion * Motion was made to approve Tentative Map of Tract No. 15178 subject to es * * * * the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A", as amended. MOTION sent CARRIED. Findin s: 1. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City, all applicable general or specific plans, and the Planning Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision. 2. That the proposed subdivision presents no problems from a planning standpoint. 3. That the design of the subdivision improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. 4. That public improvements •may be required of a developer per Section 19.08.020 of the Municipal Code and Section 66415 of the Subdivision Map Act. 5. That sidewalk constructed along .the Santa Maria street frontage and construction of ramps for the handicapped will improve pedestrian safety. 6. That Final EIR No. 148, previously certified on August 24, 1992, was considered prior to approval of the project, was determined -4- COMMISSIIONERS MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CALL INDEX adequate to serve as a Program EIR for this project, and satisfies all requirements of CEQA. The Final EIR reflects the independent judgment of the City Council. 7. That the mitigation monitoring requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 will be met through required compliance with applicable codes, standards, mitigation measures, and conditions of approval adopted in connection with the project. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the project is contained in Final EIR No, 148. CONDITIONS: 1. That a finalmap shall be recorded. The final map shall be prepared so that the Bearings relate to the State Plane Coordinate System. The final map shall be prepared on the California coordinate system (NAD83) and that prior to recordation of the final map, the surveyor/engineer preparing the map shall submit to the County Surveyor a digital -graphic file of said map in a manner described in Section 7-9-330 and 7- 9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. 2. That prior to recordation of the final map, the surveyor/engineer preparing the map shall tie the boundary of the map into the Horizontal Control System established by the County Surveyor in a manner described in Sections 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. 3. Monuments (one inch iron pipe with tag) shall be set On Each Lot Corner unless otherwise approved by the Subdivision Engineer. Monuments shall be protected in place if installed prior to completion of construction project. 4. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. -5- COMMISSIONERS MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH :1 L 1nnc ROLL CALL ra-v� rr INDEX 5. That a standard subdivision agreement and accompanying surety be provided in order to guarantee satisfactory completion of the public improvements if it is desired to record a tract map . or obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public improvements 6. That each of the proposed 4 story buildings shall have one sewer lateral serving the first floor and one sewer lateral serving the second, third and fourth floors, as approved by the Utilities Department. These two sewer laterals shall be connected within the building garages before connecting to the public sewer system, unless otherwise approved by the Utilities Department. That the townhouse units not located within the four-story structures, shall be sewered with separate lateral connections to the City sewer unless otherwise approved by the Utilities Department. 7. That each unit shall be served with individual water services. The townhouses located within the four-story structures may use water meter rooms in the parking garage, as approved by the Utilities Department. The townhouses not located in the four-story structures shall be metered separately with their meters located within the street right-of-way, unless otherwise approved by the Utilities Department. Easements shall be dedicated to the City for access to the water meter rooms within the parking garage. 8. That the design of the private streets and drives conform with the City's Private Street Policy (L-4), except as approved by the Public Works Department. The basic private street and drive width shall be a minimum of 32 feet. The location, width, configuration, and concept of the private street and drive systems shall be subject to further review and approval by the City Traffic Engineer. 9. That the intersection of the private drives and San Clemente Drive shall be designed to provide sight distance for a speed of 30 miles per hour. Slopes, landscape, walls and other -6- COMMISSIONERS m o "op CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES ROLL CALL INDEX obstruction shall be considered in the sight distance requirements. Landscaping within the sight line shall not exceed twenty-four inches in height. The sight distance requirement - may be modified at non -critical locations, subject to approval of the City Traffic Engineer. The slopes adjacent to Santa Maria and the private drive into the development shall be laid back to provide sight distance in accordance with the City Sight Distance Standard 110-L. 10. That the private drive serving the development and the museum driveway be designed to line up. 11. That the California Vehicle Code be enforced on the private streets and drives, and that the delineation acceptable to the Police Department and Public Works Department be provided along the sidelines of the private streets and drives. 12. That if it is desired to have a control gate at the entrance, a turnaround shall be provided prior to the gate. The design of the controlled entrance shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and the Fire Department. 13. That easements for public emergency and security ingress, egress and public utility purposes on all private streets be dedicated to the City and that all easements be shown on the tract map. 14. That Santa Maria shall be.improved with curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting and pavement.. 15. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review by the City Traffic Engineer for compliance with City standards and policies. 16. That asphalt or concrete access roads shall be provided to all public utilities, vaults, manholes, and junction structure -7- .I COMMISSIONERS 9oCO9 `9,`04q-�cT. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES A. Al IQOS ROLL CALL INDEX locations, with widths to be approved by the Public Works Department. 17. That street, drainage and utility improvements be shown of standard improvement plans prepared by a licensed civil engineer. 18. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared by the applicant and approved by the Public Works Department, along with a master plan of water, sewer and storm -drain facilities for the on -site improvements prior to recording of the tract map. Any modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain, water and sewer systems shown to be required by the study shall be the responsibility of the developer.' 19. That the Water Capital Improvement fee shall be paid. 20. That prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department and the Planning Department that adequate sewer facilities will be available for the project. Such demonstration shall include verification from the Orange County Sanitation District and the City's Utilities Department. 21. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to issuance of any building permits. 22. That the Public Works Department plan check and inspection fee be paid. 23. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of equipment and materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and local requirements. A traffic control plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. There shall be no construction -8- ,COMMISSIONERS MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH A ...-:1 G 1 no z ROLL CALL \ INDEX storage or delivery of materials within the Santa Barbara Drive right-of-way. 24. That overhead utilities serving the site be undergrounded to the nearest appropriate pole in accordance with Section 19.24.140 of the Municipal Code unless it is determined by the City Engineer that such undergrounding is unreasonable or impractical. 25. That a fire protection system acceptable to the Fire Department be installed by the developer and tested by the Fire Department prior to storage of any combustible materials or start of any structural framing. 26. That prior to the occupancy of any unit, a qualified acoustical engineer, retained by the City at the applicant's expense, shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that the noise level on the project does not exceed 65dB CNEL for outside living areas and the requirements of law for interior spaces. 27. That any rooftop or other mechanical equipment shall be sound attenuated in such a manner as to achieve a maximum sound level of 55 dBa at the property line. 28. That any mechanical equipment and emergency power generators shall be screened from view and noise associated with said installations shall be sound attenuated to acceptable levels in receptor areas. The latter shall be based upon the recommendations of a qualified acoustical engineer, and be approved by the Planning Department. 29. Interior noise levels in the proposed project shall not exceed 45 CNEL in any habitable space. 30. On -site water mains and fire hydrants locations shall be approved by the Fire and Public Works Departments. -9- CQPMMISSIONERS 1\01iRp"19 � CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES ROLL CALL INDEX 31. A qualified archaeologist or paleontologist shall evaluate the site prior to commencement of construction activities, and that all work on the site be done in accordance with the City's Council Policies K-5 and K-6. 32. That any Edison transformers serving the site be located outside the sight distance planes as described in City Standard 110-L, unless otherwise approved by. the Public Works Department. 33. That all applicable mitigation measures imposed by Environmental Impact Report No. 148 and Conditions of Approval of Traffic Study No. 82 shall be fulfilled. 34. That this tentative tract map shall expire if the map has not been recorded within 3 years of the date of approval, unless an extension is granted by the Planning Commission. se Permit No.3550 Item No., Reque to permit the establishment of a martial arts studio and an UP3550 acting/dan studio including aerobic lessons which specialize in the Approved training and in ction of martial arts, acting, dancing, and aerobics on property located in e M-1-A District. LOCATION: Lot 1, 12, 50 and 51, Tract No. 3201, located at 3926-3 Campus Drive, on the southeasterly side of C s Drive, between Quail Street and Dove Street, acr from the John Wayne Airport. ZONE: M-1-A APPLICANTS: Favian Carrillo and Manny Clark, urbank OWNER: Campus Square, Burbank -10- February 27, 1996 PLANNING PLAN -CHECK CORRECTIONS PLAN CHECK NO.37G-96 875 SAN CLEMENTE MITIGATION MEASURES - CIOSA AGREEMENT Measure No. 10 Street and security lighting. Submit lighting plan to be reviewed by the Public Works and Planning Departments. HOLD ON FINAL Measure No 11 Landscape Plan to Planning, Public Works and General Services. HOLD ON FINAL. Measure No. 12 Acoustical Analysis to Planning Department. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF GRADING AND BUILDING PERMITS. Measure No. 13 Same as above Measure No. 14 Need to include acoustical barriers on Grading Plan. Measure No. 51-53 An archeologist and paleontologist must submit a.letter to the Planning Department confirming presence on the site during grading activities. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF GRADING AND BUILDING PERMITS Measure No. 71 Approval of Police Department of all site plans and access plans. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS NOTE: No further revisions to the Rough Grading can be issued until a letter is received from the archeologist/paleontologist showing compliance with Mitigation Measures and Condition No. 31 of Tentative Tract Map No. 15178. Genia Garcia Associate Planner February 27, 1996 PLANNING PLAN -CHECK CORRECTIONS PLAN CHECK NO.37G-96 875 SAN CLEMENTE MITIGATION MEASURES - CIOSA AGREEMENT Measure No. 10 Street and security lighting. Submit lighting plan to be reviewed by the Public Works and Planning Departments. HOLD ON FINAL Measure No 11 Landscape Plan to Planning, Public Works and General Services. HOLD ON FINAL. Measure No. 12 Acoustical Analysis to Planning Department. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF GRADING AND BUILDING PERMITS. Measure No. 13 Same as above Measure No. 14 Need to include acoustical barriers on Grading Plan. Measure No. 51-53 An archeologist and paleontologist must submit a letter to the Planning Department confirming presence on the site during grading activities. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF GRADING AND BUILDING PERMITS Measure No. 71 Approval of Police Department of all site plans and access plans. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS NOTE: No further revisions to the Rough Grading can be issued until a letter is received from the archeologist/paleontologist showing compliance with Mitigation Measures and Condition No. 31 of Tentative Tract Map No. 15178. Genia Garcia Associate Planner