The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVILLA POINT TTM111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 *NEW FILE* Modification 2491 DSewrJ STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY GECRtGE DEUKMEJIAN, Cowmor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SOUTH COAST AREA - 245 WEST BROADWAY, SUITE 380 L �'�' LONG BEACH, CA 90802 ' —11 1� (213) 5M5071 NOTICE OF PROPOSED PERMIT AMENDMENT 2L?j5 89 , TO: All Interested Parties aaL� 7>Jj FROM: Peter Douglas, Executive Director � DATE: May 2, 1989 SUBJECT: Perm4t NO. 5-95-029 granted to The Irvine Company for: Construction of Villa Point, 154 apartment/condominium units (all units marketed as apartments but built to condominium specifications for ultimate conversion) with 330 parking spaces, landscaping and recreational amenities on two contiguous lots consisting of 12.9 gross acres. Project also to included storm drain and road improvements. at: 1200 East Coast Highway. Newport Beach, Orange County APN 422-011-14, 55 The Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission has reviewed a proposed amendment to the above referenced permit, which would result in the following change(s): 1. Reduction of units from 154 to 138. 2. Reconfiguration of the parking plan to provide the required ratio of parking spaces to living units, at 296 spaces. FINDINGS Pursuant to 14 Cal. Admin. Code Section 13166(a)(2) this amendment is considered to be IMMATERIAL and the permit will be modified accordingly if no written objections are received within ten working days of the date of this notice. This amendment has been considered "immaterial" for the following reason(s): The Coastal Commission has consistently required that for multifamily residential developments similar to the proposed project, that 2 parking spaces be provided for every living unit, with an additional parking space for every seven living units to serve as guest parking. The original permit, 5-85-129A, required that the submitted parking plan be augmented to meet that ratio. The applicants in this amendment request have reduced the number of living units to 138, with a parking plan which supplies 296 spaces. This parking plan ratio is in conformance with the Coastal Commission standards for parking. Therefore, the Commission finds that the proposed amendment is consistent with the intent of the original permit and the special conditions. If you have any questions about the proposal or wish to register an objection, please contact Don Schmitz at the Commission Area office. C2, 4/88 9785A 'f RWENTIAL ZONING CORRECTIONS Telephone: (714) 644-3200 Plan Check No: NW % GC7 '- R Inner By: Javier Garcia, Associate Planner By: Dana Dobbs, Assistant Planner //jj' Date: 1�_ Address: �.�/ �.!/J//a/ly=/�riii.�„,Fv Corrections Required: Legal Description: Lot _L Block Section Tract // Covenant required to combine lots or portions of lots. Please have owner's signature notarized on attached document and return to me. Lot Size Zone Number of Units Buildable Area Maximum Structural Area (Area including exterior walls, stairway on one level and required parking). x buildable area. Proposed Structural Area: x buildable area. Provide tissue overlay of calculations to verify provided square footage. r Open Space Area cu.ft. (volume of space equal to buildable - width times buildable height times 6). This area must be six feet in an direction (61x6'x6') and open on two sides or one side and above. Required Setbacks (Note: Architectual projections, i.e. bay windows or Balnnnies not allowed in setbacks). �AdC W ooz r"L�aus i Front Rear Right Side Left Side ,'3 Height Limitation gLA Distance between buildings �� Maximum Coverage o v 7' Measured f o average roof height. Dimension all elevations from ' to midpoint and maximum ridge of roof planes. 3a',4VG. j' 5'7'Ml3-X 421I06otT Show Ar'r'fflep PAD //z!(r on all elevations. Number of Stories Parking (9' - 4" x 19' - 011•min, clear dimensions, one space; 17' - 6" x 19' - 0" min. clear dimensions, two spaces). (Third required space may D be 8x 161) . Show clear interior dimensions of garage. Z OA WtL F C�rzc.ap oK Fair Share Contribution p Park Dedication Fee 00 tA�5-, (OVER) r' SPECIAL APPROVAL REQUIRED THROUGH: Modifications Committee. Indicate Modification Approval Number on plans., Planning Commission: Use Permit Variance Resubdivision - Tract Site Plan Review Other - Public Works: Easement/Encroachment Permit Curb Cut �G Subdivision Engineer _ Traffic Engineer ' Approval of Landscape Plans Building Department: Grading Engineer Parks Department: Approval of Landscape Plans Coastal Development Permits: _ Approval in Concept /—'r��i//!G (Note: File 3 sets of plans: plot plan, floor plan, elevations). Coastal Development Permit No. Categorical Exclusion No. (Building permits may be issued 10 days fo n suance of C.E.O.) Waiver/Exemption S-S�—Z%FoZ p(J�5n'CGu Miscellaneous CIr 6Cih�°°Y 1. Floor plan fully dimensioned showing all room uses. 2. Plot Plan fully dimensioned showing location of all buildings, (fences to property line. Show second and/or third floor building footprint on plot plan. 3. Association Approval (Advisory) 4. i Other NOTE: It is the responsibility of the applicant to circulate their plans and obtain the necessary 'approvals from the departments checked above. if you have questions regarding your application, please contact me at (714) 644-3200. MISC36ks Peu�dt c�J .C.fl zo' l G� �n t'QU i = � 1.7 �S L 10 ck-dc October 12, 1988 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Tract No. 11937 O*Items to be satisfied prior to Plan Check No. 1875 A & B -88 rough grading permit issuance. Traffic Study CONDITIONS DEPARTMENT ACTION 1. Circulation system Traffic Eng. Plans Approval improvements Hold on final Tentative Mav fo Tract No. 11939 CONDITIONS DEPARTMENT ACTION 1. Final Map Planning Hold on Final 2. Substantial conformance Planning Plans Approval 3. Improvements Public Works Plans Approval 4. Public improvements surety Public Works Plans Approval 5. Water service & sewer lateral Public Works Plans Approval 6. On -site parking & circulation Traffic Eng. Plans Approval 7. Street design (L-4) Traffic Eng. Plans Approval Fire Dept. Plans Approval 8. Site Distance Traffic Eng. Plans Approval L"T0�'9. Control Entrance design Public Works /Letter of Compliance q.�mal- and Plans Approval 10. Easement dedication Public Works Plans Approval Planning Plans Approval 11. Asphalt or concrete roads Public Works Plans Approval 12. Non-standard improve.agree. Public Works Plans Approval 13. Relocate Kiosk Public Works Plans Approval 14. Access rights to E. Coast Hwy. Public Works Plans Approval 15. Landscape plans P.B. and R. Plans approval Public Works Plans Approval Planning Plans Approval 16. Improvements Public Works Plans Approval h r 0 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Tract No. 11937 Page 2 CONDITIONS DEPARTMENT 17. Hydrology and Hydraulic Study Public Works 18. Right-of-way Public Works 19. Street improvements Public Works 20. Water Capital Improve. Fee Public Works 21. County Sanitation Dist. Fee Building 22, Public Works Plan Ck. Fee !4r"(5 Drainage 24. Off -site storm drain 0 d 25. Grading Permit h� 26. Grading Plan olo " 27. Haul Routes 8. Control Plans 29. Run-off 30. "As Built" grading plans Run-off 32. Erosion control 33. Perimeter fencing 34. Vacuum sweeping Archaeologist �0. '4\ 36. Data Recovery \�`b° 37.IF Paleontologist Public Works Grading Engineer Public Works Building Grading Engineer Grading Engineer Grading Eng. Grading Eng. Grading Eng. Planning Grading Eng. Planning Grading Eng. Planning Planning Grading Eng. Planning Planning Planning Grading Eng. ACTION Plans Approval Plans Approval Plans Approval Plans Approval Prior to Bldg. Permit issuance Plans Approval Plans Approval Plans Approval Plans Approval Plans approval Plans Arao� aa4,5774r- N�o✓ Plans a Plans Approval Plans Approval Plans Approval Plans Approval Plans Approval Letter of Compl Plans Approval Plans Approval Letter of Compl. Letter of Comply Letter of Compl. Letter of Compl.j Letter of compliance CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Tract No. 11937 Page 3 CONDITIONS DEPARTMENT ACTION 88. Fossils Planning Letter of Compliance Grading Eng. `AA, y �N 0 39. 65 db. CNEL for outside Planning Acoustical Report - {yLyyy living area Hold on final^-JaRi�5, f'" 0* 40. Park Dedication Fees Planning Plans Approval V, 41. Signage/Exterior Lighting Planning Plans Approval Public Works 42. Equipment screening Planning Plans Approval Building Hold on final 43. Noise barrier patios Planning /Acoustical Report ok-i-17-99 Hold on Final 44. Parking Areas Public Works Plans Approval Planning 45. Openable windows Building Plans Approval 46. Lighting plan Planning Plans Approval 47. Solar Hot Water System Building Plans Approval 48. Bus stop Public Works Prior to final Subdivision map 49. Tentative Map vesting Public Works Plans Approval 50. Coastal Commission Approval Planning Plans Approval Hold on final Coastal Residential Development Permit No. 9 CONDITIONS DEPARTMENT ACTION 1. Affordable Housing agreement Planning Document approval City Attorney and recordation 2. Affordable Housing agreement Planning Document approval City Attorney and recordation 3. Development agreement Planning Document approval and recordation ` I' DENTIAL ZONING CORRECTIONS or7 Telephone: (714) 644-3200 Plan Chelko: /�%S•�. By: Bill Luttrell, Associate Planner By: Javier Garcia, Associate Planner BY: Dana Dobbs, Assistant Planner Date: 4!9-� Address Corrections Required: ��J Legal Description: Lot / �9—_ _. Block Section Tractz _ Covenant required to combine lots or portions of lots. Please have owner's signature notarized on attached document and return to me. Lot Size Zone_ Number of Units — I Buildable Area _ Maximum Structural Area (Area including exterior walls, stairway on one level and required parking). x buildable area. Proposed Structural Area: x buildable area. Provide tissue overlay of calculations to verify provided square footage. Open Space Area cu.ft. (volume of space equal to buildable width times buildable height times 6). This area must be six feet in an direction (6'x6'x6') and open on two sides or one side and above. Required Setbacks (Note: Architectual projections, i.e. bay windows or balconies not allowed in setbacks). Front --if. Rear '� Right Side_ 5 Left Side , Height Limitation Measured from natural grade to average roof height. Dimension all elevations from natural grade to midpoint and maximum ridge of roof planes. , 11 Show natural grade line shown on all elevations. Distance between buildings Maximum Coverage • II Number of Stories Parking (9' - 4" x 19' - 0" min. clear dimensions, one space; 17' - 6" x' 19' - 0" min. clear dimensions, two spaces). (Third required space may be 8' x 161). Show clear interior dimensions of garage. o \\_ Fair Share Contribution 'ao San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee -� A' P D ation 12) (OVER) w :; %`w'n's.:%rr, ar.�. ..'g J,: ��aL•`^ 151gt�; -,; AT', r �. , /ni.. W� I�• ,•1.'Y 5n. I SPECIAL APPROVAL REgUIRED THROUGH: 10 Modifications Committee. Planning Commission: Use Permit Variance 'Resubdivision - Tract Site Plan Review Other - Indicate Modification Approval Number on plans. Public Works: !Easement/Encroachment Permit Curb Cut Subdivision Engineer �G Traffic Engineer ,Approval of Landscape Plans Building Department:-, _k'- Grading Engineer Parks Department: Approval of Landscape Plans Coastal Development Permits: Approval in Concept,- �101AIe_ (Note: File 3 sets of plans: plot plan, Coastal Development Permit No. Categorical Exclusion No. 1 (Building permits may be issued 10 days Waiver/Exemption a- 8a - Z y Ez floor plan, elevations). following issuance of C.E.O.) Miscellaneous 1.HFloor plan fully•.dimensioned showing all room uses. 2. Plot Plan fully, dimensioned showing location of, all buildings, !,fences to property line. Show second and/or third floor building footprint on plot plan. 3. Association Approval (Advisory) NOTE: It is the responsibility of the applicant to circulate their plans and obtain the necessary approvals from the departments checked above. if you have questions regarding your application, please contact me at (714) 644-3200. MISC3 • r�ti,,; rvy,. .;�:' �t„::W:: �+••Nhy��'y'yf.'-.•tn 4.:: d• fAtMra: iT M1 ... 1 SAN JOAQUIN HIOTRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR (SJHT*EE PROGRAM CALCULATION SHEET BUILDING PERMIT PLAN CHECK NO. OWNER'S NAME BUILDING ADDRESS 1. Area of Benefit (AOB): a. Not in AOB ❑ (No fee required) b. Zone A Single Family Residence. . . . . $1,372/D.U. u Multi Unit Residential. . . . . .$ 799/D.U. Non -Residential. . . . . . . . . $1.84/sq.ft. C. Zone B 0, Single Family Residence. . . . . $1,062/D.U. Multi Unit Residential. . . . . .$ 620/D.U. Non -Residential. . . . . . . . . $1.36/sq.ft. 2. Fee Calculation: a. Residential: 1,5f � O Increase in number of Dwellings (IDU) O` (If �a IDUp / — 0 or less, no fee required) Q�� 1IDU x � Unit Fee — C7�:ad2 SJHTC FEE B. Non Residential: Increase in gross square footage of building area (IBA)* ' sq.ft. (If IBA m 0 or less, no fee required) IBA x Sq.Ft. Fee — SJHTC FEE *Do not include parking structures. 3. Exemptions to Fee Program Parking structures Properties exempt from property tax Government -owned facilities and utilities to the extent they are not used for generating revenue or for commercial purposes. (Privately owned utilities, are not exempt). Institutional uses, i.e., universities, colleges and regional parks. 4. Total San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee (Enter amount on Building Permit Application Form) le SAN JOAQUIN HIISTRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR (SJHT*EE PROGRAM CALCULATION SHEET BUILDING PERMIT PLAN CHECK NO. 420c?9=M OWNER'S NAME BUILDING ADDRESS 1. Area o a Not in AOB ❑ (No fee required) b. Zone A Single Family Residence. . . . . $1,372/D.U. nMulti Unit Residential. . . . . .$ 799/D.U. Non -Residential. . . . . . . . . $1.84/sq.ft. C. Zone B 0 Single Family Residence. . . . . $1,062/D.U. Multi Unit Residential. . . . . .$ 620/D.U. �( Non -Residential. . . . . . . . . $1.36/sq.ft. 2. Fee Calculation: a. Residential: Increase in number of Dwellings (IDU) (If IDU — 0 or less, no fee required) IDU x Unit Fee — SJHTC FEE B. Non Residential: Increase in gross square footage of building area (IBA)* 169LW sq.ft. (I£ IBA — 0 or less, no fee required) laOC) IBA x /, Sq.Ft. Fee — /09,5-2— SJHTC FEE *Do not include parking structures. 3. Exemptions to Fee Program Parking structures Properties exempt from property tax Government -owned facilities and utilities to the extent they are not used for generating revenue or for commercial purposes. (Privately owned utilities, are not exempt). Institutional uses, i.e., universities, colleges and regional parks. 4. Total San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee $Ag+�2 (Enter amount on Building Permit Application Form) r SAN JOAQUIN HILOTRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR (SJHTOEE PROGRAM CALCULATION SHEET BUILDING PERMIT PLAN CHECK NO. 6e6lc-11' _--jrA 90- OWNER'S NAME BUILDING ADDRESS 1. Area of Benefit (AOB): a. Not in AOB (No fee required) b. Zone A 1-1 Single Family Residence. . . . . $1,372/D.U. Multi Unit Residential. . . . . .$ 799/D.U. ElNon -Residential. . . . . . . . . $1.84/sq.ft. C. Zone B 0 Single Family Residence. . . . . $1,062/D.U. Multi Unit Residential. . . . . .$ 620/D.U. p{ Non -Residential. . . . . . . . . $1.36/sq.ft. 2. Fee Calculation: a. Residential: Increase in number of Dwellings (IDU) (If IDU — 0 or less, no fee required) IDU x Unit Fee = SJHTC FEE B. Non Residential: Increase in gross square �footage/ of building area (IBA)* -� sq.ft. (If IBA — 0 or less, no fee required) 00 IBA x A /o Sq.Ft. Fee — ;;�:d SJHTC FEE *Do not include parking structures. 3. Exemptions to Fee Program Parking structures Properties exempt from property tax Government -owned facilities and utilities to the extent they are not used for generating revenue or for commercial purposes. (Privately owned utilities, are not exempt). Institutional uses, i.e., universities, colleges and regional parks. 4. Total San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee $1100 (Enter amount on Building Permit Application Form) SAN JOAQUIN HILORANSPORTATION CORRIDOR (SJHT*E PROGRAM CALCULATION SHEET BUILDING PERMIT PLAN CHECK NO. e%R9_ �� OWNER'S NAME BUILDING ADD) 1. Area or benetlt kAun): a. Not in AOB (No fee required) b. Zone A El Single Family Residence. . . . . $1,372/D.U. nMulti Unit Residential. . . . . .$ 799/D.U. El s Non -Residential. . . . . . . . . $1.84/sq.ft. C. Zone B Single Family Residence. . . . . $1,062/D.U. Multi Unit Residential. . . . . .$ 620/D.U. Non -Residential. . . . . . . . . $1.36/sq.ft. 2. Fee Calculation: a. Residential: Increase in number of Dwellings (IDU) (If IDU — 0 or less, no fee required) IDU x Unit Fee — B. Non Residential: Increase in gross square footage of building area (IBA)* /Jo20 sq.ft. (If IBA — 0 or less, no fee required) :%l:Yr40M W _ IBA x /� 16 Sq.Ft. Fee — .%&SJHTC FEE *Do not include parking structures. 3. Exemptions to Fee Program Parking structures Properties exempt from property tax Government -owned facilities and utilities to the extent they are not used for generating revenue or for commercial purposes. (Privately owned utilities, are not exempt). I'nstitutional uses, i.e., universities, colleges and regional parks. 4. Total San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee $ ! �� (Enter amount on Building Permit Application Form) .• <_ SAN JOAQUIN HI*RANSPORTATION CORRIDOR (SJHTG*EE PROGRAM CALCULATION SHEET BUILDING PERMIT PLAN CHECK NO. V-0,99- 99 OWNER'S NAME BUILDING ADDR 1. Area of Benefit (AOB): a L c Not in AOB ❑ (No fee required) Zone A Single Family Residence. . . . . $1,372/D.U. nMulti Unit Residential. . . . . .$ 799/D.U. QNon -Residential. . . . . Zone B Single Family Residence. . . . . $1.84/sq.ft. . . . . $1,062/D.U. Multi Unit Residential. . . . . .$ 620/D.U. Non -Residential. . . . . . . . . $1.36/sq.ft. 2. Fee Calculation: a. Residential: Increase in number of Dwellings (IDU) (If IDU — 0 or less, no fee required) IDU x Unit Fee — SJHTC FEE B. Non Residential: Increase in gross square footage of building area (IBA)* W sq.ft. (If IBA — 0 or less, no fee required) SRO IBA xSq.Ft. Fee — SJHTC FEE *Do not include parking structures. 3. Exemptions to Fee Program Parking structures Properties exempt from property tax Government -owned facilities and utilities to the extent they are not used for generating revenue or for commercial purposes. (Privately owned utilities, are not exempt). Institutional uses, i.e., universities, colleges and regional parks. 4. Total San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee $�— (Enter amount on Building Permit Application Form) FAIR SHARE FEES CALCULATION SHEET BUILDING PERMIT PLAN CHECK NO. d Z' OWNERS NAME BUILDING ADDRESS 1. Fee Schedule: a. Residential: (per unit) Single Family Detached $1290.51 per d.u. Single Family Attached, Duplex, Triplex, Fourplex 43 er d.u. Fiveplex, or greater 5;26 b. Hotels/Motels: (per room) 992.70 per room c. Commercial: Regional 4.50 per sq.ft. (net floor area) General Retail 3.97 per sq.ft. (gross floor area) Boat yards 3.97 per sq.ft. (net floor area) d. Office: General (net floor area) 1.29 per sq.ft. Medical (gross floor area) 3.97 per sq.ft. e. Restaurant: (gross floor area) Conventional 7.44 per sq.ft. Take -Outs 3.97 per sq.ft. f. Industrial: (net floor area) 0.60 per sq.ft. g. Recreation: (net floor area) Yacht Clubs 4.96 per sq.ft. Athletic Clubs 3.97 per sq.ft. 2. Fee Calculation: a. Residential p Increase in number of dwellings (IDU) ( IDU — 0 or less, no fee required) 107�0 �D X 8ws 90 pp . �� IDU x /ot�3�ZCp Unit Fee my FairShare b. Non Residential: Increase in gross square footage of building sea ((BA) sq.ft. (If IBA — 0 or less, no fee required) IBA x Sq.Ft. Fee m Fair Share Do not include parking structures 3. Total Fair Share Contribution $ 9i12PS-1// 090 (Enter amount on Building Permit Application Form) CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH - M E M 0 - October 14, 1988 TO: File FROM: Bill Luttrell, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Park Dedication fees for Mouth of Big Canyon In accordance with the Dedication and Park Credit Agreement entered into by the Irvine Company and the City of Newport Beach, the Irvine Company shall receive credit for the dedication of 5.0 acres. Park credits have been allocated to Tract No. 10814 and Tract No. 12105. All figures are based on the 1985 total cost per acre of $446,997.00 and the 1985 total cost per unit of $5,028.84. Park credits that have been allocated to date are 1.12 acres with 3.88 ,acres remaining. Calculations: Tract No. 10814 (Big Canyon Area 10): 21 units x $5,028.84 cost per unit — $105,605.64 total cost $105,605.64 total cost a $446,997 cost per acre a 0.24 so. Tract No. 12105 (Big Canyon Area 16): 78 units x $5,028.84 cost per unit — $392,249.52 total cost $392,249.52 total cost e $446,997.00 cost per acre m 0.88 ac. 0.24 acres allocated 5.00 acres park credit granted Tr. 10814 + 0,88 acres allocated - 1_12 Tr. 12105 1.12 3.88 total acres remaining Tract No. 11937 (Villa Point Apartments) is being granted a credit of 1.73 acres which is based on the February, 1988 Paz Dedication fee of $6,894.37 per unit and $612,833.00 cost per acre. Total,lavailable credits remaining will be 2.15 acres. 11 Tract No. 11937 (Villa Point Apartments) 154 units x 6,894.37 — $1,061,732.98 total cost $1.061,732.98 a $612,833.00 — 1.73 so. 3.88 acres remaining park credit 1,73 acres allocated 2.15 acres remaining park credit for Mouth of Big Canyon Bill*Utt BL:ll rI L 0, November 4, 1988 Tract No. 11937 TO: File FROM: Bill Luttrell Bldg. No. Units 200 A(#1) 8 100 8 200 #3 8 100 #4 8 100 #5 8 200 #6 8 200 #7 8 100 #8 8 100 #9 8 200 #10 8 600 #11 4 100 #12 8 100 #13 8 300 #14 10 200 A #15 8 600 #16 4 500 #17 8 400 #18 8 FINAL FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS FOR TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 50 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT NO. 11937 (REVISED) COASTAL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 9 (AMENDED) APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON SEPTEMBER 26, 1988 A. Environmental Findings: 1. The Planning Commission and the City Council have previously approved and certified an environmental document conjunction with their consideration of the original Tentative Mof Tract No. 11937 and related applications. �\ 2. That in order to reduce adverse impacts of the proposed project, all applicable and feasible mitigation measures discussed in the previously certified environmental document have been incorporated into the proposed project. B. Traffic Study: Approve the Traffic Study with Findings and subject to the Condition listed below: FINDINGS: 1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City Policy S-1 2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project -generated traffic will be greater than one percent of the existing traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period on any leg of four critical intersection, and will add to an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at one critical intersection, which will have an Intersection Capacity Utilization of more than .9000. 3. That the Traffic Study suggests circulation system improvements which will improve the level of traffic service to an acceptable level at the critical intersection. CONDITION: 1. That prior to occupancy of any portion of the project facilities, the circulation system improvements described in the Traffic Study for the intersection at Jamboree Road and Santa Barbara Drive will be in place (unless subsequent project approval requires modification thereto). The circulation system improvements shall be subject to the approval of �_ the City Traffic -Engineer-. --- ---- — -- C Vesting Tentative Map of Tract No, 11937: FINDINGS: 1. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City, all applicable general or - specific plans, and the Planning Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision. 2. That the proposed subdivision presents no problems from a planning standpoint. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development 4. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. 5. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. 6. That public improvements may be required of the developer in accordance with Section 19.08.020' of the Municipal Code and Section 66415 of the Subdivision Map Act. CONDITIONS: 1. That a final map be recorded and that it shall be prepared using the State Plane Coordinate System as a basis of bearing. 2. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plans, except as noted below. 3. That all improvements be constructed as required by ordinance and the Public Works Department. 4. That a standard subdivision agreement and accompanying surety be provided to guarantee satisfactory completion of the street improvements, if it is desired to obtain a building permit or record the tract map prior to completion of the public improvements. 5. That each dwelling unit be served with an individual water service and sewer lateral connection to the public water and sewer systems unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. 6. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review and approval by the Traffic Engineer prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7. That the design of the private streets and drives conform with the City's private street policy (L-4), except as approved by the Public -2- Works Department. The basic roadway width shall be a minimum of 32 feet. The location, width, configuration and concept of the private street and drive system shall be subject to further review and approval by the City Traffic Engineer. 8. That the intersection of the private streets with public streets be designed to provide sight distance for a speed of 25 miles per hour. Slopes, landscaping, walls and other obstructions shall be considered in the sight distance requirements. Landscaping within the sight distance line shall not exceed twenty-four inches in height. The sight distance requirement may be modified at non -critical locations, subject to the approval of the City Traffic Engineer. 9. That no control gate at the entrance shall be allowed unless the entrance area is redesigned to allow for a turn -around to be provided prior to the gate. The design of the controlled entrance shall be reviewed by the Public Works Department and the Fire Department. 10. The easements for public emergency and security ingress, egress and public utility purposes on all private streets be dedicated to the City, and that all easements be shown on the tract map. 11. That asphalt or concrete access roads shall be provided to all public utilities, vaults, manholes, and junction structure locations, with the width to be approved by the Public Works Department. 12. That a Non -Standard Improvement Agreement be provided for textured pavement treatments proposed over public streets or public easements. 13. That the existing kiosk in Parcel #2 be relocated to provide an emergency road connection to Parcel #1 and that an accompanying easement be provided across parcel #2 for access.(. 14. That all vehicular access rights to East Coast Highway be released and relinquished to the City of Newport Beach. 15. That landscape plans shall be subject to review and approval of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation department and the Public Works Department. 16. That street, drainage and utility improvements be shown on standard improvement plans prepared by a licensed civil engineer. 17. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared and approved by the Public Works Department, along with a master plan of water, sewer and storm drain facilities for the on -site improvements prior to recording of the final map. Any modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain, water and sewer systems shown to be required by the study shall be the responsibility of the developer. 18. That right-of-way be dedicated to the public for street and highway purposes along Back Bay Drive for a minimum 60 foot right-of-way width. -3- 9 19. That full street improvements be constructed along Back Bay Drive. These improvements shall include but not be limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement, street lights and landscaping (including slopes). 20. That the Water Capital Improvement fee be paid. 21. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to issuance of any building permits. 22. That the Public Works Department plan check and inspection fee be paid. 23. That Parcel #1 accept the drainage from Parcel #2. 24. That an off -site storm drain system be constructed conveying the drainage from Parcels #1 and 2 to the Bay. This storm drain shall also pick up drainage from an existing 18 inch drain located in East Coast Highway. 25. Development of the site shall be subject to a grading permit to be approved by the Building and Planning Departments. 26. That a grading plan shall include a complete plan for temporary and permanent drainage facilities to minimize any potential impacts from silt, debris, and other water pollutants. 27. The grading permit shall include a description of haul routes, access points to the site, watering, and sweeping programs designed to minimize impact of haul operations. 28. An erosion, siltation and dust control plan shall be submitted and be subject to the approval of the Building Department, a4.j a copy shall be forwarded to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. 29. The velocity of concentrated runoff from the project shall be evaluated, and erosive velocities controlled as part of the project design, 30. That grading shall be conducted in accordance with plans prepared by a civil engineer and based on recommendations of a soils engineer and an engineering geologist subsequent to the completion of a comprehensive soil and geologic investigation of the site. Permanent reproducible copies of the "Approved as Built" grading plans on standard size sheets shall be furnished to the Building Department. 31. Prior to the issuance of the grading permit, the design engineer shall review and state that the discharge of surface runoff from the project will be performed in a manner to assure that increased peak flows from the project will not increase erosion immediately downstream —of the — system. this report shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Building Departments. -4- <, �✓ 6) 32. That erosion control measures shall be done on any exposed slopes within thirty days after grading or as approved by the Grading Engineer. 33. That perimeter fencing shall conform to the maximum height of 6 feet as provided by the Villa Point Planned Community Development Standards unless a modification is approved by the City in accordance with Chapter 20.81 of the Municipal Code. Those portions of the perimeter fencing .adjacent to East Coast Highway and Back Bay Drive shall maintain as a minimum, the setbacks shown on the approved site plan. 34. All proposed development shall provide or vacuum sweeping of parking areas. i\ 35. A qualified archaeologist shall be present\ during pregrade meetings to inform the developer and grading contractors of the results of the study. In addition, an archaeologist shall be present during grading activities to inspect the underlying soil for cultural resources. If significant cultural resources are uncovered, the archaeologist shall have the authority to stop or temporarily divert construction activities for a period of 48 hours to assess the significance of the finds. 36. In the event that significant archaeological remains are uncovered during excavation and/or grading, all work shall stop in that area of the subject property until an appropriate data recovery program can be developed and implemented. The cost of such a program shall be the responsibility of the landowner and/or developer. 37. A paleontological monitor shall be retained by the landowner and/or developer to attend pregrade meetings and perform inspections during development. The paleontologist shall be allowed to divert, direct, or halt grading in a specific area to allow for salvage of exposed fossil materials. 38. Should fossils be discovered during grading operations, the landowner shall donate the fossils collected to a non-profit institution. i 39. That prior to the occupancy of any unit, a qualified acoustical engineer, retained by the City at the applicant's expense, shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that the noise impact from East Coast Highway and Back Bay Drive on the project does not exceed 65 db CNEL for outside living areas and the requirements of law for interior spaces. 40. That prior to the recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall satisfy the requirements of the Park Dedication Ordinance to the satisfaction of the Planning Director provided further, that a portion of —the previously approved park dedication credit for the mouth -of Big Canyon may be used to satisfy the park dedication requirement for this project. -5- 41. Signage and exterior lighting shall be approved by the Planning Department and the Public Works Department. 42. All mechanical equipment, vents, and other service equipment shall be shielded or screened from view by architectural features. 43. Upstairs patio areas will be glassed in for all areas within the 65 CNEL contour. Units within these buildings will also be provided with aluminum sliding windows of normal 1/8 inch thickness. Downstairs units within the 65 CNEL contour will be shielded from the noise source by a barrier approved by the Planning Director. 44. Parking areas shall be paved early during construction. 45. Openable windows shall be used to allow cooling by normal breezes. 46. A lighting plan which describes how energy conservation has been incorporated into the lighting scheme shall be submitted for approval by the Planning Department. 47. A solar hot water system will be installed for the community pool and spa. 48. Prior to approval of the final subdivision map, the applicant shall consult with the Public Works Department and the Orange County Transit District regarding the provision of a bus stop and related amenities (i.e., shelter, bench) along East Coast Highway adjacent to the project site. ` If required, the applicant shall be responsible for the installation of a permanent bus stop along East Coast Highway. 49. That this vesting tentative map and all vested rights contained herein shall expire if the map has not been recorded within three (3) years of the date of approval, unless an extension is granted by the Planning Commission. If the final map is approved, the vested rights shall last for a period of one (1) year from the date of approval of the final map. 50. That the applicant shall obtain Coastal Commission approval of this application prior to the approval of the final map. D. Coastal Residential Development Permit No. 9: Approve Coastal Residential Development Permit No. 9, with the following Findings, and subject to the Conditions listed below: FINDINGS: 1. That the project as conditioned, provides 28 affordable housing units. 2. That the provision of affordable housing is consistent with the requirements -of State law relative to -low- and_moderate=income_housing _ _ in the Coastal Zone. 10 CONDITIONS: 1. That at least 10%, of the total number of units (14) be made available to low and moderate income families (less than 80% of median) for a period of 20 years, either on -site or off -site at the Baywood Apartments. Preference shall be given to HUD Section 8 Certificate and Voucher holders in the rental of the units. Rents shall be at the Section 8 Fair market rents for a 2 bedroom unit as if occupied by a family of four, and a 1 bedroom unit as if occupied by a family of 2, regardless.of family size. Income limits shall be based on family size using the section 8 table. 2. That at least 10% of the total number,of units shall be made available to County median income families (� ss than 100% of median) for a period of 20 years, either on -site.. or off -site at the Baywood Apartments. 3. That prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City, approved by the City Attorney and Planning Director, which guarantees the provision of "affordable" units on -site or off -site in accordance with the requirements of Conditions No. 1 and No. 2 above. -7- ,, TI a COMMISSIONERS 4s, mo�\��o��\o'ym9\ August 18, 1988 MINUTES $o yY _ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH INDEX ROLL —CALL AND • C Coastal Residential Development •Permit No. 9 • •(Amended), _ Request to amend a previously approved coastal residential development permit which established the affordable housing requirements for the Villa Point residential condominium development. The proposed amendment involves a request to amend the conditions for affordable housing within the subject project. LOCATION: Portions of Block 55• and 94, Irvine's Subdivision, located at 1200 East Coast Highway, on the northeasterly corner of Jamboree Road and East Coast Highway, across from Irvine Terrace. ZONE: P-C APPLICANT: Regis Contractors Inc., Newport Beach OWNER: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach ENGINEERS: Adams/Streeter, Irvine James Hewicker, Planning Director, suggested that the following conditions be added to Vesting Tentative Map of Tract No. 11937: Condition No. 49: "That this vesting tentative map and all vested rights contained herein shall expire if the map has not been recorded within three (3) years of the date of approval, unless an extension is granted by the Planning Commission. If the Final Map is approved, the vested rights shall last for a period of one (1) year from the date of approval of the Final Map." Condition No. SO: "That the applicant shall obtain Coastal Commission approval of this application prior to the approval of the Final Map." The public hearing was opened in, connection with this item, and Mr. David Dmohowski, representing The Irvine Company, appeared before the Planning Commission. Mr. Dmohowski concurred with the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A" including recommended Conditions No. 49 and No. 50, with the exception of Condition No. 1, Coastal Residential Development Permit No. 9 regarding the affordable housing requirement. In reference to Condition No. 1, Mr. Dmohowski stated that staff has -27- COMMISSIONERS .V MINUTES y °`y ` CITY OF NEWPORT August 18, 1988 BEACH ROLL CALL INDEX recommended. 20 percent of the units be affordable to lower income families over a period of 20 years, and that The .Irvine Company is requesting that the requirement be 15 percent affordable units over a period ' of 15 years. In reference to the Housing Element, 'Mr. Dmohowski explained that The Irvine Company does 'not believe that there is a justification for requiring the level of affordable housing as well as the length of term as suggested by staff inasmuch as the density of the project is 15 units per acre. He stated that there is no form of financial governmental assistance, and no density bonus is contemplated. Mr. Dmohowski stated that The Irvine Company is utilizing • existing entitlement authorized under the "General Plan for the Newport Center area. , Mr. Dmohowski stated that the requirements that staff has recommended to establish income levels and rent levels are more strict than previous requirements; however, he said that The Irvine Company would agree to said requirements to show a good faith effort toward the housing assistance program and goals. He stated that the terms of the condition impose an excessive economic burden on the project compared to other projects in a similar situation. Mr. Dmohowski requested offsite consideration of establishing housing at Baywood Apartments inasmuch asp it would be a convenient location in terms of employment, day care facilities, and shopping. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Debay regarding the residual parcel, Mr. Dmohowski replied that said parcel is subject to the General Plan Up -date; however, he said that The Irvine Company would prefer the site be designated -� similar density as Phase One of the vesting parcel. Ms. Barbara Tappan, 1007 Dolphin Terrace, appeared before the Planning Commission. Ms. Tappan stated her concerns regarding the projected traffic congestion at the intersection of East Coast Highway and Jamboree Road, and the noise emitting from the automobiles coming from Balboa Island and waiting for the traffic light at said intersection. She explained that Irvine Terrace residents are adversely affected by the noise and fumes of the automobiles that are waiting at the 'traffic signal at said intersection. In response to questions posed by Ms. Tappan, Don Webb, City Engineer, replied _28_ COMMISSIONERS yy �oyl� o August 18, 1988 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES ROLL CALL INDEX that the traffic generated by the proposed development would be comparatively small in comparison to the total traffic on East Coast Highway. He said that the intersection will be under construction within the next four months due to substantial widening of East Coast Highway that will adequately 'aecomodate the traffic generated by the subject project. Mr. Webb further. replied that a third left turn lane will be added' at East Coast Highway eastbound going north on to:Jamboree Road, that construction will commence in December 1988, and will be completed in December 1989. Mr. Hewicker stated that the proposed project's traffic will exit onto Back Bay Drive. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed at this time. Motion * Motion was made to 'approve Traffic Study 50, Vesting Tentative Map of Tract No. 11937 (Revised) and Coastal Residential Development Permit No. 9 (Amended) subject tb the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A", including added Conditions No. 49 and No. 50, and to revise Condition No. 1, Coastal Residential Development Permit No. 9 to state 'gthat at least 15 percent of the total number of units (21) be made available to Lower Income Families..". Mr. Hewicker referred to The Irvine Company's request to modify Condition No. 1 to state 15 percent of the total number of units for a period of 15 years. Robert Lenard, Advance Planning Manager, stated that if the project would be located in another area of the City that staff may not have an objection to The Irvine Company's request; however, he said that the reason for staff's recommendation is that there has been an attempt to provide affordable housing within Newport Center and he referred to the Newport Village\project• that would have provided 150 additional affoi'�able units. In reference to the General Plan Review,he commented that staff has recommended that Newport Village be converted to a low rise, low intensity office project which would eliminate' the 150 affordable units; however, he recommended that Villa Point and Corporate Plaza provide the affordable housing in Newport Center. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Debay, Mr. Lenard replied that staff would object to the transfer of affordable units to Baywood Apartments inasmuch as staff is attempting to provide affordable _P9_ COMMISSIONERS MINUTES August 18, 1988 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CALL. INDEX housing within new projects as opposed to existing projects. t Commissioner Merrill and Chairman Pers6n discussed the recommended land use change at the -Newport Village'site from residential use to low rise office use. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Merrill, Mr. Lenard replied that no park fees or fair share fees have been waived for the proposed project. Commissioner Merrill stated that he would support the motion, and he recommended the motion be amended to state "..for a Amended * period of 15•years..". Commissioner. Merrill commented that he would support the Baywood Apartment site, as suggested, inasmuch as services are conveniently located. The maker of the motion agreed -to the suggested amendment to Condition No. 1 as stated. . . Discussion ensued between Commissioner Winburr.'and Mr. Lenard regarding the change of the affordable housing provision from previously approved ten year requirements to recently approved thirty year requirements. Mr. Lenard explained that the change occurred because of concerns that have been expressed by the Planning Commission and the City Council that ten years would not be long enough if the City wanted to have a meaningful program. Commissioner Di Sano stated that his motion 'indicated that 15 years is considered to be a compromise. Chairman Pers6n disagreed inasmuch as he said that the Planning Commission has been attempting to achieve more than a 10 year affordable housing requirement for several years; that there have been previous discussions that 30 years may not even be long enough for some projects; that there has been pressure that projects be approved for longer than 10 years; and that there are previously approved projects that have nearly completed the 10 year affordable housing requirement. Substitute Commissioner Pomeroy made a substitute motion to approve ' Motion * Traffic Study No. 50, Vesting Tentative Map of Tract No. 11937 (Revised) and Coastal Residential Development Permit No. 9 (Amended) subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A", including added conditions No. 49 and No. 50 as suggested by staff, and to amend Condition No. 1 of the Coastal Residential Development Permit No. 9 to.state "That at least 20 percent of the total number of units (28) be made available to 10 -30- COMMISSIONERS MINUTES ymG�t^�9N�y9 9y 91. August 18, 1988 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CALL INDEX percent of the low income families and 10 percent to the moderate income families (100 percent of median) for a period of 12 years. That the units to be made available to moderate income families shall be on site and the units to -be made available to low income families shall be located at an offsite location at the developers option. yes * * * Condition No. 1 of the foregoing substitute motion was Noes * * * voted on, and MOTION FAILED. r Ayes * * * Condition No. 1 of the original motion was voted on, and Noes * * * MOTION FAILED. Motion was made to approve Traffic Study No. 50, Motion * Tentative Map of Tract No. 11937 (Revised) and Coastal Residential Development Permit No. 9 (Amended), subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A", including the addition of Conditions No. 49 and No. 50. Substitute Substitute motion was made to revise Condition No. 1, Motion * Coastal Residential Development Permit No. 9 to state "that at least 20 percent of the total number of units (28) be made available to Lower Income Families (less than• 808 of median) that can be located offsite or at the developers option for a period of 20 years...". Commissioner Winbu-n stated that the Planning Commission has been attempting to provide a residential area and affordable housing in Newport Center for many years. She said that affordable housing has been "dumped" into Baywood Apartments on numerous occasions, and on that basis she commented that she would not support the substitute motion. Commissioner Debay stated that she would oppose the substitute motion inasmuch as she had a concern that it would not be favorable to continually relocate affordable housing to Baywood Apartments. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Merrill, Commissioner Pomeroy replied that he did not specifically state Baywood Apartments, that it would be at the developers option that the affordable housing could be located offsite. Chairman Pers6n asked the maker of•the substitute motion if he would amend his motion to state "that 10 percent of- the total number of units may be offsite and 10 -31- ry COMMISSIONERS ARGO-01&x,'a9im9\ August 18, 1988 MINUTES Pyre CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH INDEX -ROLL CALL - percent of the total number -of units, be onsite"? The Amended * maker of the motion agreed to said amendment. Mr. Lenard suggested that affordable housing could be transferred to Baywood Apartments, Newport North, or Mariner's Apartments. Commissioner Pomeroy suggested that the offsite location as'stated in the substitute motion be amended to specify Baywood Apartments. Substitute motion as amended to approve Condition No. 1, Ayes * * * Coastal Residential Development Permit No. 9, was voted Noes on, MOTION FAILED. Motion was voted on to approve Traffic Study No. 50, Tentative Map of Tract No. 11937 (Revised) and Coastal Residential Development Permit No. 9 (Amended), subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A", including the addition of Conditions No. 49 and No. 50. MOTION All Ayes CARRIED: A Environmental Findings: 1. The Planning Commission and the City Council have previously approved and certified an environmental 'document in conjunction with their consideration of the original Tentative Map of Tract No. 11937 and related applications. 2. That in order to reduce adverse impacts of the proposed project, all applicable and feasible mitigation measures discussed in the previously certified environmental document have been incorporated into the proposed project. �,B Traffic Study: Approve the Traffic Study with ,�jndings and subject to the Condition listed below: FINDINGS: 1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City Policy S-1 2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project - generated traffic will'be greater than one percent of the existing traffic during the 2.5 hour peak -32- .• JI y _ I COMMISSIONERS 10 August 18, 1988 MINUTES Pyr0� y �� .CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH INDEX ROLL CALL _- period on any leg of four critical intersection, and will add to an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at one critical intersection, which will have an Intersection Capacity Utilization of more than .9000. ' 3. That the Traffic Study suggests circulation system improvements which :will -improve the- level of traffic service to an acceptable level at the critical intersection. �OfIDITION: 1. That prior to occupancy of any portion of the project facilities, the circulation system improvements described in the Traffic Study for the intersection at Jamboree Road and Santa Barbara Drive will be in place (unless subsequent project approval requires modifi.ation thereto). The circulation system improvements shall be subject to the approval of the City Traffic Engineer. C Vesting Tentative Man of Tract No. 11937: Recommend that the City Council approve the Tentative Map of.Tract No. 11937 subject to the following Findings and Conditions of Approval: FINDINGS: 1. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City, all applicable general or specific plans, and the Planning Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision. 2. That the proposed subdivision presents no problems from a planning standpoint. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 4. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. 5. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through -33- I %' COMMISSIONERS August 18, 1988 MINUTES s o�y �` CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH - INDEX_ ROLL CALL- - - - - - - - or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. 6. That public* improvements. may be required• of the developer in accordance with Section •10.08.020 of the Municipal Code 'and Section 66415 :of the Subdivision Map Act. CONDITIONS: •1. That a final map be recorded and that it shall be prepared using the State Plane Coordinate System as a basis of bearing. 2. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plans, except as noted below. 3. That all improvements be constructed as required by ordinance and the Public Works Department. 4. That a standard subdivision agreement and accompanying surety be provided to guarantee .satisfactory completion of the street improvements, if it is desired to obtain a building permit or record the tract map prior to completion of the public improvements. 5. That each dwelling unit be served with an individual water service and sewer lateral connection to the public water and sewer systems unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. 6. That the,on-site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestri&'} circulation systems be subject to further review and approval by the Traffic Engineer prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7., That the design of the private streets and drives conform with the City's private street policy (L- 4), except as approved by the' Public Works Department. The basic roadway width shall be a minimum of 32 feet. The location, width, configuration and concept of the private street and drive system shall be subject to further review and approval by the City Traffic Engineer. -34- h COMMISSIONERS yGG \A\04 y ROLL CALL - MINUTES August 18, 1988 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 8. .That the intersection of the private streets with public streets be designed to provide sight distance for a speed of 25 miles per hour. Slopes', landscaping, walls and other obstructions shall be considered in the sight distance requirements. Landscaping within the sight distance line shall not exceed twenty-four inches in height. The sight distance requirement may be modified 'at non- critical locations, subject to the approval of the City Traffic Engineer. 9. 'That no control gate at the entrance shall be allowed unless the entrance area is redesigned to allow for a turn -around to be provided prior -to the gate. The design of the controlled entrance shall be reviewed by the Public Works Department.and the Fire Department. 10. The easements for public emergency and security ingress, egress and public utility purposes on all private streets be dedicated to the City, and that all easements be shown on the tract map. 11. That asphalt or concrete access roads shall be provided to all public utilities, vaults, manholes, and junction structure locations, with the width to be approved by the Public Works Department. l 12. That a Non -Standard Improvement Agreement be provided for textured pavement treatments proposed over public streets or public easements. 13. That the existing kiosk in Parcel #2 be relocated to provide an emergency road connection to Parcel #1 and that an accompanying easement be provided across parcel #2 for access. 14. That all vehicular access rights to East Coast Highway be released and relinquished to the City of Newport Beach. 15. That landscape plans shall be subject to review and approval of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation department and the Public Works Department. 16. That street, drainage and utility improvements be shown on 'standard improvement plans prepared by a licensed civil engineer. -35- INDEX COMMISSIONERS top August 18, 1988 G99No9� yQ� MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH INDEX -ROLL - CALL 17. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared and -approved by the Public Works Department, along with a master plan of water, sewer and storm drain facilities for the on -site improvements prior to recording of- the final map. Any modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain, water and sewer systems shown to be required by the study shall be the responsibility of the developer. 18. That be dedicated to the public for _right-of-way. street and highway purposes along Back Bay Drive for a minimum 60 foot right-of-way width. 19. That full street improvements be constructed along Back Bay Drive. These improvements shall include but not be limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement, street lights and landscaping (including slopes). 26. That the Water Capital Improvement fee be paid. 21. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to issuance of any building permits. 22. That the Public Works Department plan check and inspection fee be paid. 23. That Parcel #1 accept the drainage from Parcel #2. 24. That an off -site storm drain system be constructed conveying the drainage from Parcels #1 and 2 to the Bay. This storm drain shall also pick up drainage from an existing 18 inch drain located in East Coast lighway. 25. Development the site shall be subject to a ,of grading permit to be approved by the Building and Planning Departments. 26. That a grading plan shall include a complete plan for temporary and permanent drainage facilities to minimize any potential impacts from silt, debris, and other water pollutants. 27. The grading permit shall include a description of haul routes, access points to the site, watering, and sweeping programs designed to minimize impact of haul operations. -36- COMMISSIONERS ROLL CALL ;t Al MINUTES August 18, 1988 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH INDEX 28. An erosion, siltation and dust control plan shall be submitted and be subject to the approval of the Building Department, and a copy shall be forwarded to the California Regional Water Quality Control • Board, Santa Ana Region. 29. The .velocity of concentrated runoff from the project shall be evaluated, and erosive velocities controlled as part of the project design. 30. That grading shall be conducted in accordance with plans prepared by a civil engineer and based on recommendations of a soils engineer and an engineering geologist subsequent to the completion of a comprehensive soil and geologic investigation of the site. Permanent reproducible copies of the "Approved as Built" grading plans on standard size sheets shall be furnished to the Building Department. 31. Prior to the issuance of the grading permit, the design engineer shall review and state that the discharge of surface runoff from the project will be performed in a manner to assure that increased peak flows from the project will not increase erosion immediately downstream of the system. this report shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Building Departments. 32. That erosion control measures shall be done on any exposed slopes within thirty days after grading or as approved by the Grading Engineer. 33. That perimeter fencing shall conform to the maximum height of 6 feet as provided by the Villa Point Planned Community Development Standards unless a modification is'approved by the City in accordance with Chapter 20.81 of the Municipal Code. Those portions of the perimeter fencing adjacent to East Coast Highwy and Back Bay Drive shall maintain as a minimum, the setbacks shown on the approved site plan. 34. All proposed development shall provide for vacuum sweeping of parking areas. 35. A qualified archaeologist shall be present during pregrade meetings to inform the developer and grading contractors of the results of the study. -37- 3�, COMMISSIONERS lvoi August 18, 1988 MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH INDEX ROLL CALL - -- - ' - - - - - In addition, an archaeologist shall be present during grading activities to inspect the underlying soil for cultural resources. . if significant cultural resources are uncovered, the archaeologist shall have the •aAthority to stop or temporarily divert construction activities for a period of 48 hours to assess. the significance of the finds. 36. In the event that significant archaeological remains are uncovered during excavation and/or grading, all work shall stop in that area of the subject property until an appropriate data recovery program can be.developed and implemented.. The cost of such a program shall be the responsibility of the landowner and/or developer. 37. A paleontological monitor shall be retained by the lane )caner and/or developer to attend pregrade meetings and perform inspections during development. The paleontologist shall be allowed to divert, direct, or halt grading in a specific area to allow for salvage of exposed fossil materials. 38. Should fossils be discovered during grading operations, the landowner shall donate the fossils collected to a non-profit institution. 39. That prior to the occupancy oL' any unit, a qualified acoustical engineer, retained by the City at the applicant's expense, shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that the noise impact from East Coast Highway and Back Bay Drive on the project does not exceed 65 db CNEL for outside living areas and the requirements of law for interior spaces. 40. That prior to the recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall satisfy the requirements of the Park Dedication Ordinance to the satisfaction of the Planning Director provided further, that a portion of the previously approved park dedication credit for the mouth of Big Canyon may be used to satisfy the park dedication requirement for 'this project. 41. Signage and exterior lighting shall be approved by the Planning Department and the Public Works Department. -38- COMMISSIONERS W ��C` yyo � August 18, 1988 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES. ROLL CALL INDEX 42. All mechanical equipment, vents, and other service equipment shall be shielded or screened from view by architectural features. 43. Upstairs patio areas will be glassed in for, all areas within the 65 CNEL contour. Units within these buildings will; also be provided with aluminum sliding windows of normal 1/8 inch thickness. Downstairs units within the 65 CNEL contour will be shielded from the noise source by a barrier approved by the Planning Director. 44. Parking areas shall be paved early during - construction. 45. Openable windows shall be used to allow cooling,by normal breezes. 46. A lighting plan which describ 5 how energy conservation has been incorporated into the lighting scheme shall be submitted for approval by the Planning Department. 47. A solar hot water system will be installed for the ,community pool and spa. 48. Prior to approval of the final subdivision map, the applicant shall consult with the Public Works Department and the Orange County Transit District regarding the provision of a bus stop and related amenities (i.e., shelter, bench) along East Coast Highway adjacent to the project site. If required, the applicant shall be responsible for the installation of a permanent bus stop along East Coast Highway. 49. That .this vesting tentative map and all vested rights contained herein shall expire if the map'has not been recorded within three (3) years of the date of approval, unless an:extension is granted by the Planning Commission. ' If' the final map is approved, the vested rights shall last for a period of one (1) year from the date of approval of the final map. 50. That the applicant shall obtain Coastal Commission approval of this application prior to the approval of the final map. -39- ROLL COMMISSIONERS August 18, 1988 MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH INDEX CALL - - - - - -- - -- - 'p Coastal Residential Development Permit No. 9; Approve Coastal Residential Development Permit No. 9,'with the following Findings,. and. subject to the Conditions listed below: FINDINGS: 1. That the project as conditioned, provides 28 affordable housing units. 2. That the provision of affordable housing is consistent with the requirements of State law relative to low- and moderate -income housing in the Coastal Zone. CONDITIONS: 1. That at least 20% of the total number of units (28) be made available to Lower Income Families (less than 80% of median) for a period of 20 years. Preference shall be given to HUD Section 8 Certificate and Voucher holders in the rental of the units. Rents shall be at the Section 8 Fair market rents for a 2 bedroom unit as if occupied by a family of four, and a 1 bedroom unit as if occupied by a family of 2, regardless of family ' size. Income limits shall be based on family size using the section 8 table. 2. That prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City, approved by the City Attorney and Planning Director, which guarantees the provision of "affordable" units on -site in accordance with the requirements of Condition No. 1 above. -40- Q y� FINAL SWINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVOIR: GPA 83-2c, A14ENDMENT NO. 605, TRAFFIC STUDY TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT NO. 11937 and RESIDENTIAL COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 9 APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON May 29, 1984 RECONSIDERED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON NOVEMBER 26, 1984 A. Environmental Document 1. Approve the Draft Environmental Impact Report, City of Newport Beach, Villa Point Apartments, Pacific Coast Highway Frontage, and supportive materials; 2. Recommend that the City Council certify the Environmental Document is complete; 3. Make the Findings listed below: FINDINGS: 1. That the environmental document has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State EIR Guidelines and City Policy. 2. That the contents of this environmental document have been considered in the various decisions on the project. ih 3. That in order to reduce adverse impacts of the proposed project, all feasible mitigation measures discussed in the environmental document have been incorporated into the proposed project. B. General Plan Amendment 83-2(c) (Portion) 1. Adopt Resolution No. 84-45, adopting amendments to the Land Use and Residential Growth Elements of the Newport Beach General Plan for the Coast Highway/ Jamboree site. C. Amendment No. 605 . 1. Adopt Ordinance No.-84=13,, adopting the Villa Point Planned Community District Regulations. D. Traffic Study 1. Approve the Traffic Study and make the following Findings, based upon the facts and subject to the Conditions listed below: FINDINGS: 1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City Policy S-1. FINAL FINAINGSCONDZTIONS ' GPA 83-2c, A605, TS, TMT 11937, RCDP No. 9 Page -2 2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project -generated traffic will be greater than one percent of the existing traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period on any leg of six critical intersections, and will add to an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at two critical intersections, which will have an Intersection Capacity Utilization of more than .9000. 3. That the Traffic Study suggests circulation system improvements which will improve the level of traffic service to an acceptable level at all critical intersections. CONDITION: 1. That prior to occupancy of any portion of the project facilities, the circulation system improvements described in the Traffic Study to the intersections at Jamboree Road and Bristol Street and at Jamboree Road and Ford Road will be in place (unless subsequent project approval requires modification thereto). The circulation system improvements shall be subject to the approval of the City Traffic Engineer. E. Tentative Map of Tract No. 11937 FINDINGS: 1. That the map meetslIthe requirements of Title 19 of the Newpo t Beach Municipal Code,---101rdinances !off thL City, all applicable geleral or specific plans, and the Planning Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision. 2. That the proposed subdivision presents no problems from a planning stand- point. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of develop- ment. 4, That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. S. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. 6. That the proposed development will generate an increase in daily trips sufficient in magnitude to, warrant a fair share assessment to mitigate the increased traffic congestion and traffic noise resulting from the cumula- tive affect of additional traffic generated by commercial, office and multiple residential development in the center. 7. That the project as conditioned is consistent with the Housing Element of the _General Elan as amended June_25, 1984, in that -the -project meets or exceeds all criteria set forth therein. CONDITIONS: 1. That a final map be filed. FINAL FINDINGS *CONDITIONS . ` GPA 83-2c, A605, TS, TMT 11937, RCDP No. 9 Page -3 2. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the plans sub- mitted except as noted below. 3. That all improvements be constructed as required by ordinance and the Public Works Department. 4. That a standard subdivision agreement and accompanying surety be provided to guarantee satisfactory completion of the street improvements, if it is desired to obtain a building permit or record the tract map prior to completion of the public improvements. 5. That each dwelling unit be served with an individual water service and sewer lateral connection to the public water and sewer systems unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. 6. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review by the Traffic Engineer. 7. That the design ot�the private streets and drives conform with the City's private street policy (L-4), except as approved by the Public Works Department. The basic roadway width shall be a minimum of 32 feet. The location, width, configuration and concept of the private street and drive system shall 1�e.subject to further review and approval by -the City Traffic Engineer, andtthe Fire Dep&rtm6nt. B. That the intersection of the private streets with public streets be designed to provide sight distance for a speed of 45 miles per hour. Slopes, landscaping, walls and other obstructions shall be considered in the sight distance requirements. Landscaping within the sight distance line shall not exceed �_aenty-four inches in height. The sight distance requirement may be modified at non -critical locations, subject to the approval of the City Traffic Engineer. 9. That the California Vehicle Code be enforced on the private streets and drives, and that the delineation acceptable to the Police Department and Public Works Department be provided along the sidelines of the private streets and drives. 10. That no control gate at the entrance shall be allowed unless the entrance area is redesigned to allow for a turn -around to be provided prior to the gate. The design of the controlled entrance shall be reviewed by the Public Works Department and the Fire Department. 11. The easements for ingress, egress and public utility purposes on all private streets be dedicated to the City, and that all easemerits be shown on the tract map. 12. That asphalt- _or concrete access _roads shall be provided -to -all public utilities, vaults, manholes, and junction structure locations, with the width to be approved by the Public Works Department. FINAL FINDINGS 210 CONDITIONS GPA 83-2c, A605, TS, TMT 11937, RCDP No. 9 Page -4 13. That all vehicular access rights to East Coast Highway be released and relinquished to the City of Newport Beach except for one access point, with the location to be approved by the Public Works Department. 14. That landscape plans shall be subject to review and approval of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department and the Public Works Department. 15. That street, drainage and utility improvements be shown on standard improvement plans prepared by a licensed civil engineer. 16. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared and approved by the Public Works Department, along with a master plan,of water, sewer and storm drain facilities for the on -site improvements rior to recording of the final map. Any modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain, water and sewer systems shown to be required by the study shall be the responsibility of the developer. 17. That prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department and the -Planning Department that adequate sewer facilities will be available for the project. Such demonstration shall include verification from the Orange County Sanitation District .and the City's Utilities Department. 18. That a maximum of tent feet of pedestrian easement or additional right- of-way be dedicated to the public for street and highway purposes along the East Coast Highway Frontage adjacent to Lots No. 1 and 2, and the residual parcel, with the exact amount to be determined by the Public Works Department. This right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City prior to August 1, 1984. 19. That additional right-of-way be dedicated to the public for street and highway purposes along Back Bay Drive from Jamboree Road to East Coast Highway. The roadway shall have a minimum right-of-way width of 72 feet and a maximum width of 82 feet. 20. That full improvements be constructed along Back Bay Drive from Jamboree Road to East Coast Highway. These improvements shall include but not be limited to curb, gutter,;sidewalk, pavement and street lights. s 21. That the developer construct a traffic signal at the intersection of East Coast Highway and Back,$ay Drive. The plans for the traffic signal shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. This signal shall be installed prior to occupancy, unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. A separate agreement.and surety may be provided for this work. 22. That the developer be responsible for 50% of the cost of the traffic signal_ at the__ intersection of_Jamboree_Road with Back -Bay Drive. A -- separate agreement and surety should be provided. 23. That the developer contribute to the City the cost of improving East Coast Highway to major highway standards along the proposed tract frontage which runs from Back Bay Drive easterly to the easterly boundary FINAL FINDINGSPA&-CONDITIONS GPA 83-2c, A605, TS, TMT 11937, RCDP No. 9 Page -5 of the tract. This contribution shall be deposited with the City prior to recording any tract maps or issuance of any grading or building permits. 24. The Irvine Company shall provide for approximately 1,100 linear feet of an off -site storm drain, from the Jamboree Road intersection down Back Bay Drive to the existing storm drain inlet structure at the Back Bay. This storm drain shall be constructed concurrently with project construction. 25. A storm drain shall be provided as part of the project, to channel ,surface waters from the project site and a portion of East Coast Highway ',to the master -planned off site storm drains. This storm drain shall be Lonstructed concurrently with project construction. 26. That the location of fire hydrants and water mains shall be approved by the Fire Department. 27. That emergency access to and within the site shall be approved by the Fire Department. -• 28. Development of the site shall be subject to a grading permit to be ap- proved by the Building and Planning Departments. 29. That a grading plan shall include a 16omplete plan for temporary and permanent drainage facilities to minimize any potential impacts from silt, debris, and other water pollutants. 30. The grading permit shall include a description of haul routes, access points to the site, watering, and sweeping programs designed to minimize impact of haul operations. 31. An erosion, siltation and dust control plan shall be submitted and be subject to the approval of the Building Department, and a copy shall be forwarded to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. 32. The velocity of qoncentrated runoff from the project shall be evaluated, and erosive velocities controlled as part of the project design. 33. That grading shall be'coxiducted in accordance with plans prepared by a civil engineer and based•'on recommendations of a soils engineer and an engineering geologist subsequent to the completion of a comprehensive soil and geologic investigation of the site. Permanent reproducible copies of the "Approved as Built" ,grading plans on standard size sheets shall be furnished to the Building Department. 34. Prior to the issuance of the grading permit, the design engineer shall review and state that the discharge of -surface runoff from, the project will be performed in a manner to assure that increased peak flows from the project will not increase erosion immediately downstream of the system. This report shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Building Departments. •. FINAL FINDINGS CONDITIONS GPA 83-2c, A605, TS, TMT 11937, RCDP No. 9 Page -6 . 35. That erosion control measures shall be done on any exposed slopes within thirty days after grading or as approved by the Grading Engineer. 36. All proposed development shall provide for vacuum sweeping of parking areas. 37. A qualified archaeologist shall be present during pregrade meetings to inform the developer and grading contractors of the results of the study. in addition, an archaeologist shall be present during grading activities to inspect the under- lying soil for cultural resources. If significant cultural resources are uncovered, the archaeologist shall have the authority to stop or temporarily divert construction activities for a period of 48 hours to assess the significance of the finds. 38. in the event that significant archaeological remains are uncovered during excavation and/or grading, all work shall stop in that area of the subject property until an appropriate data recovery program can be developed and implemented. The cost of such a program shall be the responsibility of the landowner and/or developer. 39. A paleontological monitor shall be retained by the landowner and/or developer to attend pregrade meetings and perform inspections during development. The paleontologist shall be allowed to divert, direct, or halt grading in a specific area to allow for salvage of exposed fossil materials. ti 40. Should fossils be discovered during grading operations, the landowner shall donate the fossils collected to a non-profit institution. 41. Prior to issuance of any grading or demolition permits, the applicant shall waive the provisions of AB952 related to City of Newport Beach responsibilities for the mitigation of archaeological impacts, in a manner acceptable to the City Attorney. 42. That prior to the occupancy of any unit, a qualified acoustical engineer, retained by the City at the applicant's expense, shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that the noise impact from East Coast Highway and. Back Bay • Drive on the project does not exceed 65 db CNEL for outside livingareasand the requirements of law for interior spaces. 43. Prior to issuance of any building permits authorized by the approval of this tentative map, the applicant shall deposit with the City's Finance Director the sum proportional to the. percentage of future additional traffic related to the project in .the subject area, to be used for the construction of a sound -attenuation barrier on the southerly side of West Coast Highway in the West Newport Area and in the Irvine Terrace and Jamboree Road areas. This contribution is estimated to be $21,600, based ___on a-,080 daily trips at $90 per trip. 44. Prior to the issuance of any building and/or grading permit, the applicant shall pay its "fair share" of circulation systems improvements for the ultimate circulation system. This contribution is estimated to be $231,120, based on 1,080 daily trips at $214 per trip. In lieu of a t. FINAL FINDINGSWCONDITIONS GPA 83-2c, A605, TS, TNT 11937, RCDP No. 9 Page -7 monetary fair -share contribution, the City will accept the dedication of the additional right-of-way needed for the Coast Highway widening project between Jamboree Road and Bayside Drive to fulfill this condition. This dedication would include only the land owners interests in the De Anza village area and be further defined as needed by the Public Works Depart- ment. The additional right-of-way dedicated will also satisfy the fair share requirement for the commercial development on the site bounded by East Coast Highway, Jamboree Road and Bay Bay Drive. In no event will the amount of fair share credit granted exceed 0.5 times the buildable area of the site. By the placement of this limit on fair share credit the City is not implying that this level of intensity will be approved. Additionally, credit granted will only be for the development ultimately approved on the site, and cannot be used by development on any other site. 45. That prior to the 'recordation of the final map, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City, approved by the City Attorney and the Planning Director, which guarantees the provision of four "affordable" units on site or off site in the Baywood expansion. YY: 46. Of the "affordable" units provided, three shall be affordable to a Coi,nty median income family and one shall be affordable to a County moderate income family, f 47. The affordability oW'the units ! sklallt be guaranteed for a period of at least ten years. 48. That the requirements of the Park Dedication Ordinance will be satisfied by the use of park credits granted to The Irvine Company for the dedication of the Mouth of Big Canyon. 49. Signage and exterior lighting .shall be approved by the Planning Department and the Public Works Department. 50. All mechanical equipment, vents, and other service equipment shall be shielded or screened from view by architectural features. i 51. Upstairs patio areas. -will be glassed in for all areas within the 65 CNEL contour. Units within"these buildings will also be provided with aluminum sliding windows'of'normal 1/8 inch thickness. Downstairs units within the 65 CNEL contour will be shielded from the noise source by a barrier approved by the Planning Director. 52. Parking areas shall be paved early during construction. 53. Openable windows. shall be used to allow cooling by normal breezes. 54. A lighting plan which describes -how energy conservation has been-incor--.__ - - porated into the lighting scheme shall be submitted for approval by the Planning Department. 55. A solar hot water system will be installed for the community pool and spa. FINAL FINDINGS 10 CONDITIONS `✓ GPA 83-2c, A605, TS, TMT 11937, RCDP No. 9 Page -8 56. Prior to approval of the final subdivision map, the applicant shall consult with the Public Works Department and the Orange County Transit District regarding the provision of a bus stop and related amenities (i.e., shelter, bench) along East Coast Highway adjacent to the project site. The applicant shall be responsible for the installation of a permanent bus stop along East Coast Highway subsequent to widening of the highway in 1985-86. An interim bus stop with access to the project site may be provided until that time. If required, the applicant shall be responsible for the dedication and installation of a permanent bus stop along East Coast Highway. 57. TP{?• City of Newport Beach requires each project to provide for all necessary roadway improvements. Several improvements necessary for this project have been required of previously -approved projects but are not yet constructed. The project will be required to contribute to or provide full improvements to intersections identified in the Traffic Study (unless subsequent project approval requires modification thereto). The circula- tion system improvements shall be subject to the approval of the City Traffic Engineer. 58. That the driveway be designed for two-way ingress and egress if determined to be feasible by the Public Works Department and that it not be provided until the nursery use is, terminated. Further, that the driveway onto Coast Highway be closed, Wf feasible. 59. That development is subject to the review and approval by the City of a Development Agreement for Newport Center as required by General Plan Amendment No. 83-1(e). 60. That the Development Agreement shall include provisions for the phasing of the Villa Point project with the construction of affordable housing units on the Newport Village, Baywood Expansion or Fifth Avenue and MacArthur Boulevard sites. In the event one or more of these projects cannot be timed to coincide with the construction of this project, the City may allow the appropriate number of affordable housing units to be provided on a temporary basis on site; off site on the Baywood Expansion, Fifth Avenue and.MacArthur Boulevard or Newport Village sites; or a combination thereof. F. Coastal Residential Development Permit No. 9 1. Approve Coastal Residential 'Development Permit No. 9, make the following Findings, based upon the facts and subject to the Conditions listed below: i . FINDINGS: 1. That there are no social,_ technical, environmental or related problems _ associated with the provision of four affordable housing units. 2. That four affordable housing units could be provided and still allow a reasonable return on investment. FINAL FINDINGS CONDITIONSWil y GPA 83-2c, A605, TS, TMT 11937, RCDP No. 9 Page -9 3. That development of the site is not exempt from the provisions of State law relative to low- and moderate -income housing in the Coastal Zone. 4. That 121 of the proposed 154 units will be matched on a one -for -one basis with affordable housing units on the Newport Village, Fifth Avenue and MacArthur Boulevard or Baywood Expansion sites. CONDITIONS: 1. That prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City, approved by the City Attorney and Planning Director, which guarantees the provision of four "affordable" units on site or off site in the Baywood expansion. 2. Of the "affordable" units provided, three shall be affordable to a County median income family and one shall be affordable to a County moderate income family. 3. The affordability of the units shall-: be guaranteed for a period of at least ten years. 4. That development is subject to the review and approval of a Development Agreement for Newport •Center as required by General Plan Amendment 83-1(e) (Portion). ( it 5. That the Development Agreement shall include provisions for the phasing of the Villa Point project with the construction of affordable housing units on the Newport Village, Baywood Expansion or Fifth Avenue and MacArthur Boulevard sites. In the event one or more of these projects cannot be timed to coincide with the construction of this project, the City may allow the appropriate number of affordable housing units to be provided on a temporary basis on site; off site on the Baywood Expansion, Fifth Avenue and MacArthur Boulevard or Newport Village sites; or a combination thereof. N. r 1( • 41�U October 12, 1988 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Tract No. 11937 Plan Check No. 1875 A & B -88 Traffic Stud OItems to be satisfied prior to rough grading permit issuance. CONDITIONS DEPARTMENT ACTION 1. Circulation system Traffic Eng. Plans Approval improvements Hold on final Tentative MaD fo Tract No. 11939 CONDITIONS DEPARTMENT ACTION 1. Final Map Planning ( Hold on Final \ 2. Substantial conformance Planning Plans Approval 3. Improvements Public Works Plans Approval 4. Public improvements surety Public Works Plans Approval 5. Water service & sewer lateral Public Works Plans Approval 6. On -site parking & circulation Traffic Eng. Plans Approval 7. Street design (L-4) Traffic Eng. Plans Approval Fire Dept. Plans Approval 8. Site Distance Traffic Eng. Plans Approval 9. Control Entrance design Public Works Letter of Compliance and Plans Approval 10. Easement dedication Public Works Plans Approval Planning Plans Approval 11. Asphalt or concrete roads Public Works Plans Approval 12. Non-standard improve.agree. Public Works Plans Approval 13. Relocate Kiosk Public Works Plans Approval 14. Access rights to E. Coast Hwy. Public Works Plans Approval 15. Landscape plans P.B. and R. Plans approval Public Works Plans Approval Planning Plans Approval 16. Improvements Public Works Plans Approval C CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Tract No. 11937 Page 2 CONDITIONS DEPARTMENT 17. Hydrology and Hydraulic Study Public Works. 18. Right-of-way Public Works 19. Street improvements Public Works 20. Water Capital Improve. Fee Public Works 21. County Sanitation Dist. Fee Building ACTION Plans Approval Plans Approval Plans Approval Plans Approval Prior to Bldg. Permit issuance 22. Public Works Plan Ck. Fee Public Works Plans Approval 23. Drainage Grading Engineer Plans Approval 24. Off -site storm drain Public Works Plans Approval 25. Grading Permit Building Plans Approval 26. Grading Plan Grading Engineer Plans approval Haul Routes Grading Engineer Plans Approval 28. Control Plans Grading Eng. Plans Approval 29. Run-off `Grading Eng. Plans Approval 30. "As Built" grading plans Grading Eng. Plans Approval Planning Plans Approval Run-off Grading Eng. Plans Approval Planning Letter of Compl. 32. Erosion control Grading Eng. Plans Approval 33. Perimeter fencing Planning Plans Approval 34. Vacuum sweeping Planning Letter of Compl. 35. Archaeologist Grading Eng. Letter of Compl. Letter of Compl. Planning �1,zcgg ,36. Data Recovery Planning Letter of Compl. 12 �g 37. Paleontologist Planning Letter of compliance o� Grading Eng. u y CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Tract No. 11937 Page 3 CONDITIONS DEPARTMENT ACTION 12.7-o_8`b 38. S Fossils Planning Grading Eng. Letter of Compliance 65 db. CNEL for outside Planning Acoustical Report living area Hold on final 40. Park Dedication Fees Planning Plans Approval 41. Signage/Exterior Lighting Planning Plans Approval Public Works 42, Equipment screening Planning Plans Approval Building Hold on final 43. Noise barrier patios Planning Acoustical Report Hold on Final 44, Parking Areas Public Works Plans Approval Planning 45. Openable windows Building Plans Approval 46. Lighting plan Planning Plans Approval 47. Solar Hot Water System Building Plans Approval 48. Bus stop Public Works Prior to final Subdivision map 49. Tentative Map vesting Public Works Plans Approval 50. Coastal Commission Approval Planning Plans Approval Hold on final Coastal Residential Development Permit No. 9 CONDITIONS DEPARTMENT ACTION 1, Affordable Housing agreement Planning Document approval City Attorney and recordation 2. Affordable Housing agreement Planning Document approval City Attorney and recordation 3. Development agreement Planning Document approval and recordation FINAL FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS FOR TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 50 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT NO. 11937 (REVISED) COASTAL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 9 (AMENDED) -- — — APPROVED BY THE -CITY COUNCIL ON -- — SEPTEMBER 26, 1988 A Environmental Findings: 1. The Planning Commission and the City Council have previously approved and certified an environmental document 1.n conjunction with their consideration of the original Tentative Ma\ of Tract No. 11937 and related applications. V 2. That in order to reduce adverse impacts of the proposed project, all applicable and feasible mitigation measures discussed in the previously certified environmental document have been incorporated into the proposed project. B. Traffic Study: Approve the Traffic Study with findings and subject to the Condition listed below: FINDINGS_: 1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City Policy S-1 2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project -generated traffic will be greater than one percent of the existing traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period on any leg of four critical intersection, and will add to' an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at one critical intersection, which will have an Intersection Capacity Utilization of more than .9000. 3. That the Traffic Study suggests circulation system improvements which will improve the level of traffic service to an acceptable level at the critical intersection. CONDITION: 1. That prior to occupancy of any portion of the project facilities, the circulation system improvements described in the Traffic Study for the intersection at Jamboree Road and Santa Barbara Drive will be in place (unless subsequent project approval requires modification thereto). The circulation system improvements shall be subject to the approval of _ the City Traffic Engineer. -- -- — — C. Vesting.,Tentative Map of Tract No. 11937: FINDINGS: 1. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the Newport Beach — Municipal Code, —all ordinances -of -the City, all- applicable -general --or specific plans, and.the-Planning Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision. " 2. That the proposed subdivision presents no problems from a planning standpoint. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development 4. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. 5. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. 6. That public improvements may be required of the developer in accordance with Section 19.08.020 of the Municipal Code and Section 66415 of the Subdivision Map Act. CONDITIONS: 1. That a final map be recorded and that it shall be prepared using the _ State Plane Coordinate System as a basis of bearing. 2. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plans, except as noted below. 3. That all improvements be constructed as required by o'.dinance and the Public Works Department. 4. That a standard subdivision agreement and accompanying surety be provided to guarantee satisfactory completion of the street improvements, if it is desired to obtain a building permit or record the tract map prior to completion of the public improvements. 5. That each dwelling unit be served with an individual water service and sewer lateral connection to the public water and sewer systems unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. 6. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review and approval by the Traffic Engineer prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7. That the design of the private streets and drives conform with the City's private street policy (L-4), except as approved by the Public _2- Works Department. The basic roadway width shall be a minimum of 32 feet. The location, width, configuration and concept of the private street and drive system shall be subject to further review and approval by the City Traffic Engineer.. - s — That the intersection of -the -private streets with -public —streets --be --- designed to provide sight distance for a speed of 25 miles per hour. Slopes, landscaping, walls and other obstructions shall be considered in the sight distance requirements. Landscaping within the sight distance line shall not exceed twenty-four inches in height. The sight distance requirement may be modified at non -critical locations, subject to the approval of the City Traffic Engineer. 9. That no control gate at the entrance shall be allowed unless the entrance area is redesigned to allow for a turn -around to be provided prior to the gate. The design of the controlled entrance shall be reviewed by the Public Works Department and the Fire Department. 10. The easements for public emergency and security ingress, egress and public utility purposes on all private streets be dedicated to the City, and that all easements be shown on the tract map. 11. That asphalt or concrete access roads shall be provided to all public utilities, vaults, manholes, and junction structure locations, with the width to be approved by the Public Works Department. 12. That a Non -Standard Improvement Agreement be provided for textured pavement treatments proposed over public streets or public easements. 13. That the existing kiosk in Parcel #2 be relocated to provide an emergency road connection to Parcel #1 and that an accompanying easement be provided across parcel #2 for access.(: 14. That all vehicular access rights to East Coast Highway be released and relinquished to the City of Newport Beach. - 15. That landscape plans shall be subject to review and approval of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation department and the Public Works Department. 16. That street, drainage and utility improvements be shown on standard improvement plans prepared by a licensed civil engineer. 17. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared and approved by the Public Works Department, along with a master plan of water, sewer and storm drain facilities for the on -site improvements prior to recording of the final map. Any modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain, water and sewer systems shown to be required by the study shall be the responsibility of the developer. is. That right-of-way be dedicated to the public for street and highway purposes along Back Bay Drive for a minimum 60 foot right-of-way width. -3- ntiusrr ,+� 19. That full street improvements be constructed along Back Bay Drive. These improvements shall include. but not be limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement, street lights and landscaping (including slopes). 20-- That the -Water -Capital Improvement -fee be -paid. 21. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to issuance of any building permits. 22. That the Public Works Department plan check and inspection fee be paid. 23. That Parcel #1 accept the drainage from Parcel #2. 24. That an off -site storm drain system be constructed conveying the drainage from Parcels #1 and 2 to the Bay. This storm drain shall also pick up drainage from an existing 18 inch drain located in East Coast Highway. 25. Development of the site shall be subject to a grading permit to be approved by the Building and Planning Departments. 26. That a grading plan shall include a complete plan for temporary and permanent drainage facilities to minimize any potential impacts from silt, debris, and other water pollutants. 27. The grading permit shall include a description of haul routes, access points to the site, watering, and sweeping programs designed to minimize impact of haul operations. 28. An erosion, siltation and dust control plan shall be and be subject to the approval of the Building Department, ai.1 a copy shall be forwarded to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. 29. The velocity of concentrated runoff from the project shall be evaluated, and erosive velocities controlled as part of the project design. 30. That grading shall be conducted in accordance with plans prepared by a civil engineer and based on recommendations of a soils engineer and an engineering�eologist subsequent to the completion of a comprehensive soil and ge6logic investigation of the site. Permanent, reproducible copies of the "Approved as Built" grading plans on standard size sheets shall be furnished to the Building Department, 31. Prior to the issuance of the grading permit, the design engineer shall review and state that the discharge of surface runoff from the project will be performed in a manner to assure that increased peak flows from the project will not increase erosion immediately downstream -of the system. this report shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Building Departments. -4- 32. That erosion control measures shall 19e done on any exposed slopes within thirty days after grading or as approved by the Grading Engineer. 33. That perimeter fencing shal3--conform-to the maximum height o£76-feet-as provided by the Villa Point Planned Community Development Standards unless a modification is approved by the City in accordance with Chapter 20.81 of the Municipal Code. Those portions of the perimeter fencing adjacent to East Coast Highway and Back Bay Drive shall maintain as a minimum, the setbacks shown on the approved site plan. 34. All proposed development shall provide for vacuum sweeping of parking areas. 35. A qualified archaeologist shall be present during pregrade meetings to inform the developer and grading contractors of the results of the study. In addition, an archaeologist shall be present during grading activities to inspect the underlying soil for cultural resources. If significant cultural resources are uncovered, the archaeologist shall have the authority to stop or temporarily divert construction activities for a period of 48 hours to assess the significance of the finds. 36. In the event that significant archaeological remains are uncovered during excavation and/or grading, all work shall stop in that area of the subject property until an appropriate data recovery program can be developed and implemented. The cost of such a program shall be the responsibility of the landowner and/or developer. 37. A paleontological monitor shall be retained by the landowner and/or developer to attend pregrade meetings and perform inspections during development. The paleontologist shall be allowed to divert, direct, or halt grading in a specific area to allow for salvage of exposed fossil materials. 38. Should fossils be discovered during grading operations, the landowner shall donate the fossils collected to a non-profit institution. I 39. That prior to the 'occupancy of any unit, a qualified acoustical engineer, retained by\ the City at the applicant's expense, shall demonstrate to the sati:fta�ction of the Planning Director that the noise impact from East Coast A- ghway and Back Bay Drive on the project does not exceed 65 db CNEL for outside living areas and the requirements of law for interior spaces. 40 That prior to the recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall satisfy the requirements of the Park Dedication Ordinance to the satisfaction of the Planning Director provided further, that a portion of -the previously approved park dedication credit for -the mouth -of Big _-- Canyon may be used to satisfy the park dedication requirement for this project. -5- 41. Signage and exterior lighting shall be approved by the Planning Department and the Public Works Department. 42. All mechanical equipment, vents, and other service equipment shall be shielded or screened from view by architectural features. 43. Upstairs patio areas will be glassed in for all areas within the 65 CNEL contour. Units within these buildings will also be provided with aluminum sliding windows of normal 1/8 inch thickness. Downstairs units within the 65 CNEL contour will be shielded from the noise source by a barrier approved by the Planning Director. 44. Parking areas shall be paved early during construction. 45. Openable windows shall be used to allow cooling by normal breezes. 46. A lighting plan which describes how energy conservation has been incorporated into the lighting scheme shall be submitted for approval by the Planning Department. 47. A solar hot water system will be installed for the community pool and spa. 48. Prior to approval of the final subdivision map, the applicr-It shall consult with the Public Works Department and the Orange County Transit District regarding the provision of a bus stop and related amenities (i.e., shelter, bench) along East Coast Highway adjacent to the project site.-` If required, the applicant shall be responsible for the installation of a permanent bus stop along East Coast Highway. 49. That this vesting tentative map and all vested rights contained herein shall expire if the map has not been recorded within three (3) years of') the date of approval, unless an extension is granted by the Planning Commission. If the final map is approved, the vested rights shall last for a period of one (1) year from the date of approval of the final map. 50. That the applicant shall obtain Coastal Commission approval of this application prior to the approval of the final map. D. Coast,ill Residential Development Permit No. 9: Approve Coastal Residential Developmett Permit No. 9, with the following Findings, and subject to the Conditions' below: FINDINGS: 1. That the project as conditioned, provides 28 affordable housing units. 2. That the provision of affordable housing is consistent with the _ requirements_ of State law relative to -low- and moderate-income_housing— in the Coastal Zone. 10 CONDITIONS: 1. That at least 16% of the total number of units (14) be made available to low and moderate income families (less than 80% of median) for a period of 20 years, either on -site or off -site at the Baywood -- — Apartments. Preference -shall be —given to HUD Section 8 Certificate and Voucher holders in the rental of the units. Rents shall be at the Section 8 Fair market rents for a 2 bedroom unit as if occupied by a family of four, and a 1 bedroom unit as if occupied by a family of 2, regardless .of family size. Income limits shall be based on family size using the section 8 table. 2. That at least 10% of the total number;of units shall be made available to County median income families (.ess than 100% of median) for a period of 20 years, either on -sit., or off -site at the Baywood Apartments. 3. That prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City, approved by the City Attorney and Planning Director, which guarantees the provision of "affordable" units on -site or off -site in accordance with the requirements of Conditions No. 1 and No, 2 above. I -7- RESIDENTIAL ZONING CORRECTIONS Telephone: (714) 644-3200 i'Plan Check No: &W % 6y A Bill Luttrel Associate Planner By: Dana Dobbs, Assistant Planner By: Javier Garcia, Associate Planner Date: 1 e2 Address: -/ Corrections Required: Legal Description: Lot _� Block Section Tract // % Covenant required to combine lots or portions of lots. Please have owner's signature notarized on attached document and return to me. L6t Size Zone Number of Units 1-59 Buildable Area Maximum Structural Area (Area including exterior walls, stairway on one level and required parking). x buildable area. Proposed Structural Area: x buildable area. Provide tissue overlay of calculations to verify provided square footage. Open Space Area cu.ft. (volume of space equal to buildable width times buildable height times 6). This area must be six feet in any direction (61x6'x6') and open on two sides or one side and above. Required Setbacks (Note: Architectual projections, i.e. bay windows or balconies not allowed in setbacks). i Front 7 i Rear S Right Side I'D Left Side Height Limitation oVE Measured from to average roof height. Dimension all elevations from to midpoint and maximum ridge of roof planes. UG. J' 37 M" �ide'6- /J Sho p'o Ep D on all elevations. Distance between buildings (o Maximum Coverage Number of Stories c- n Parking (9' - 4" x 19' - 0",min. 'clear dimensions, one space, 17' - 6" x 19' - 0" min. clear dimensions, two spaces). (Third required space may be 8' x 161). Show clear interior dimensions of garage. Z -an U4'- . cv-a-� Fair Share Contribution 4912 San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee 49.,' '&o O� Park Dedication Fee % 7 8 a,,e-1-A1& V L ,v (OVER) / f ,1 sPECIAL APPROVAL REQUIREb THROUGH:r Modifications Committee, Indicate Modification Approval Number on plans. Planning Commission: Use Permit Variance Resubdivision - Tract Site Plan Review Other - Public Works: ,K Easement/Encroachment Permit Curb Cut -Y- Subdivision Engineer �51L— Traffic Engineer Approval of Landscape Plans Building Department: 4/- Grading Engineer _cam -Krg vrp-r Parks Department: Approval of Landscape Plans Coastal Development Permits: Approval in Concept (Note: File 3 sets of plans: plot plan, floor plan, elevations). Coastal Development Permit No. Categorical Exclusion No. (Building permits may be issued 10 days following issuance of C.E.O.) Waiver/Exemption V- 4?6-29Eoe Miscellaneous 1. Floor plan fully dimensioned showing all room uses. 2. Plot Plan fully dimensioned showing location of all buildings, fences to property line. show second and/or third floor building footprint on plot plan. 3. Association Approval (Advisory) 4. Other ell l LG/( L(t 1ttLF,$�1ii P� led7�_��/JlT1 v NOTE: It is the responsibility of the applic*• o circulate their plans and obtain the necessary approvals from the departmen't��iecked above. If you have questions regarding your application, please contact me at (714) 644-3200. MISC3 Willi Q'0bl'5. �-7 6 i I,egis Contractors, Inc. 5160 Birch Street, Suite 200, Newport Beach, CA 92660 (714) 851-9561 April 12, 1989 Mr. Bill Ward Planning Department City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 Dear Bill, I would like to propose that the private street in the Villa Point project, Tract 11937, be named Villa Point Drive. Please process this request with the Final Tract map for Tract 11937. Sincerely, lug David McMahan Area Manager cc: City of Newport Beach/VP Correspondence File E-Bii'i Littre]ll_, kda C • ArcfiftectSheet ure/PlanoHng 17992MitcbellSoutb !ruing California 92714 7141660-0970 FAX 7141863-1374 lbrtLauderrWe, 1Z Office 3051462-4964 VansmitW fi: / ,II G V/ �C/W/�r Date: �' tl{�'/,�.�/ ProJectName: , IU �IN7- t' 4 NNIAI& � PmjectNo.. 1/„ IN 7 ') N6,VP� (��LS/t �jmr-&rr Attn: Re: to Afessenger ❑ Via Hand ❑ Via Afall ❑ Pomp Descrtplionr ❑Spedfimlions O Sbop Drawing Prints IdOrawings ❑ Samples ❑ Cbange Order ❑ Literature ❑ Under Separate Cow ❑ Via ❑ Slwp D-wing Reproducibles ❑ Othen Copies Date Rea No. Description Action Code �� S�t�!b F�,ocn� r•=rne 1/ruck ActionCedes- A See item inumnitted B. No action mgtimd G Sign and tenrm to tbls ofJfce U. Sign wul forward m noted below E See below Remarks: ❑A'ryourReguest ❑ForAppmml ❑ Acknowledge receipt ofenclosums ❑ Forynur Use/Reference ❑ ForDisnibutlon ❑ Return enclosures to us ❑ ForR&dm and Comment ❑ ForyourRecords ❑Other: By.* Me, CST,lnc Ibnnedy Corbin/YawaJup and Panne rs, Inc 0 0 Regis Contractors, Inc. 5160 Birch Street, Suite 200, Newport Beach, CA 92660 (714) 851-9561 January 13, 1989 City of Newport Beach ATTN: Bill Luttrell Planning Department P.o. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 Dear Bill, Per our 01/12/89 conversation on the Villa Point Conditions of Approval you indicated that item 9, concerning submittal of a design for a controlled access gate, was the one remaining item to be worked off. There are no plans or desire to have a controlled, gated entry to Villa Point. As we agreed this letter will serve as notification that there is no intent to ever install controlled access to Villa Point. Bill if you discover anything else please contact me at (714) 851-9561. Sincerely, tt� ri rr David McMahan Area Manager cc: City of Newport Beach Permit File Adams Streeter Danh Ho - Adams Streeter LO'ILGL�G•tyG�71, � % • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department DATE: March 28, 1989 TO: Raimar Schuller, Building Director FROM: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Director SUBJECT: BONITA CREEK ACTIVITY BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS Irvine Pacific and the City have negotiated an Agreement in principle which will provide aesthetic improvements to the activity building at Bonita Creek Park. Residents in the area have objected to the red roof and exterior stone finish on the building, and Irvine Pacific has agreed to finance improvements consisting of: 1. Removal of the existing roof and installation of a new concrete tile roof. 2. Provide a stucco finish to the building's exterior. In consideration of the cost of these improvements to City property, the Building De-partment is hereby requested to waive permit fees. ADAMS • STREETER CIVIL ENGINEERS INC. 1] n u Jan A. Adams • Randal L. Streeter December 15, 1988 _ City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92658 Attention: Mr. Bill Luttrell Dear Mr. Luttrell: Per Condition of Approval for Villa Point Condominiums, Tract No. 11937, this proposed development will increase the surface runoff from a non -developed condition, however, all runoff will be picked up through an approved storm drain system. •Project development therefore will reduce the erosion potential around this site. Also, all slopes are being protected by berms, drainage systems (terrace drains) and approved erosion control; as shown on the, grading plans. If you have any questions, please contract me at (714) 474-2330. Sincerely, �.JP7YbuV ii� � _ Danh C. Ho RCE 33110 DCH:lb cc: Bill Fishcel - Irvine Pacific Jim Gilly - Regis Construction V David Mc Mahan - Regis Construction 1S rr)P P(1P ATF PA P K - IPA/INF rA Q77"1.A - 71A-A7d.?-4':( W 0) Environmental Assessment Transportation Engineering _ Resource Management Lsa-- -_ - — - Community Planning Environmental Restoration December 14, 1988 Mr. Bill Luttrell City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport BoU1evard P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92660-3884 SUBJECT: VILLA POINT PROJECT Dear Bill: Mr. David McMahan of Regis Contractors has contacted LSA Associates,() Inc. (LSA) regarding the need for paleontological .and archaeological obser- vation for the Villa Point property. LSA has arranged to have a qualified paleontologist and archaeologist available for grading observation, atten- dance of the pre -grade meeting, and will prepare a brief letter report upon completion of grading activities. These services will fulfill the K-5 and K- 6 requirements for cultural resources for the City of Newport Beach. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 553-0666. Sincerely, Beth Padon Associate BP/db(REG801) ❑ 1 Park Plaza, Suite 500 • Irvine, California 92714 • (714) 553-0666 0 157 Park Place 9 Pt. Richmond, California 94801 • (415) 236-6810 kegis Contractors, Inc. 5160 Birch Street, Suite 200, Newport Beach, CA 92660 (714) 851-9561 December 09,1988 Mr. Rick Higley City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, CA 92658 Dear Rick, Item 27 on the Villa Point plan check (1875) conditions of approval ask for proposed haul .routes to and from the project. On this particular project there is no import or export form off -site- All borrow will come from the residual parcel adjoining phase one. If you have any questions contact me at (714) 851-9561. �i Sincerely, dli�"f David McMahan Area Manager cc: City of Newport Beach Dahn Ho/Adams Streeter Adams St` ester IRVINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY November 9, 1988 Mr. Don Webb City Engineer, Public Works Department City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 Subject: Jamboree Widening at Santa Barbara Dear Don: Pursuant to our previous agreement concerning the handling of fair share fees on Irvine Pacific projects and the City of Newport Beach's share of the subject road construction costs, The Irvine Pacific Company has transferred $90,634.20 to The Irvine Community Development Company to cover the costs of the fair share fees on the Villa Point project (tract 11937). This $90,634.20 will be applied to the City of Newport Beach's share of the road construction costs as established at the completion of the road construction. If you have any questions on this matter please contact me at (714) 720-5468. Sincerely, AG�� l Peter K. Pirzadeh Manager, Traffic Engineering PKP/sp cc: Bill Fischel, Irvine Pacific David McMahan, Regis Contractors Tom Sakai, The Irvine Company 550 Newport Center Drive, P.O. Box I, Newport Beach, California 92658-8904• (714) 720-2380 A Division of The Irvine Company Regis Contractors, Inc. 5160 Birch Street, Suite 200, Newport Beach, CA 92660 (714) 851-9561 r tV U .I 1933 'C:, . November 4, 198S J.RV tE PACIFIC P°J!. I!U. Mr. Don Webb City Engineer, Publics Work Department City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. - Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 Dear Mr. Webb, In consideration of the City of Newport Beach issuing a Rough Grading Permit for the Villa Point Condominium project, located on tract 11937 in the City of Newport Beach, we understand and agree that said Rough Grading Permit entitles the Irvine Pacific Company to perform Rough Grading only. No additional construction or permitting rights are conferred by the issuance of this permit. In addition to the above the Irvine Pacific Company in no way relinquishes any of the rights and privilege granted under California Statues in conjunction with the approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map number 11937. P1inerely, Fisch Vice President cc: City of Newport beach David McMahan - Regis Contractor's Danh Ho - Adams Streeter w_a i TRANSMITTAL LETTER From: Regis Contractors, Inc. 5160 Birch Street, Suite 200 Newport Beach, CA 92660 714/ 851-9561 To: Mr. Bill Littrell City of Newport Beach Date: 12-09-88 Project: Villa Point Job No.: 959 Regarding: Plan check 1975 Villa Point .Item 39 conditions 6f approval Please be advised that we are sending you: (a attached [] under separate cover via U.S. MAIL the following: d prints d plans d contract d purchase order d specifications rj artwork d proofs d photographs d copy of letter d change order 0 No. Date Copies Descri tion I noise analysis tract 11937 2 3 4 5 These are being transmitted as indicated below submit copies f as requested d approved as is d for dis r—i ution xl for approval d approved with corrections d return _ corrected [J for your files d returned with corrections d returned after loan d for your comments d resubmit _ copies for approval to us d for bid(s) due COMMENTS: This should resolve item 39 on the conditions of approval. cc: City of Newport Beach Danh Ho/Adams Streeter Signed' p�..1 Adams Streeter David McMahan Area Manager CF110(12/84) NOISE ANALYSIS FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11937 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH I Report # 88-25-8 August 25, 1988 Prepared For. REGIS CONTRACTORS 5160 Birch Street Suite 200 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Prepared By: Fred Greve, P.E. Kelly Vandever MESTRE GREVE ASSOCIATES 280 Newport Center Drive Suite 230 Newport Beach, CA 92660-7528 (714)760-0891 I Mestre Greve Associates Villa Point Apartments Page 1 ___ __ NOISE ANALYSIS FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11937 _^ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 1.0 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to demonstrate compliance of Tentative Tract 11937 with the noise related 'Conditions of Approval' placed on the project by the City of Newport Beach. The project calls for the development of multi -family residential units. The report addresses the future exterior and interior noise levels at the project site. The project is located along Pacific Coast Highway (Exhibit 1) and is exposed to traffic noise from this roadway. The project is not impacted by aircraft or railroad noise sources. This study determines the need for any exterior and interior mitigation measures to provide adequate protection from noise levels associated with the ultimate traffic volume projected for the Pacific Coast Highway. 2.0 NOISE CRITERIA The predominant rating scale now in use in California for land use compatibility assessment is the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). CNEL is a 24 hour time weighted annual average noise level based on the A -weighted decibel. A -weighting is a frequency correction that correlates overall sound pressure levels with the frequency of the human ear. Time weighting refers to the fact that noise that occurs during certain sensitive time periods is penalized for occurring at these times. The evening time period (7 PM to 10 PM) penalizes noises by 5 dB while nighttime (10 PM to 7 AM) noises are penalized by 10 dB. These time periods and penalties were selected to reflect peoples sensitivity to noise as a function of activity. The City of Newport Beach conditions of approval specifies interior and exterior noise limits for residential land uses. The interior noise standard is 45 CNEL for all habitable rooms. For exterior living areas, the City specifies an exterior noise level goal of 65 CNEL. 3.0 METHODOLOGY The noise levels projected in the next section of this report were computed using the Highway Noise Model published by the Federal Highway Administration ("FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model", FHWA-RD-?,%Z 108, December 1578). The FHWA Model uses traffic volume, vehicle mix, vehicle speed, and i,)adway geometry to compute the "equivalent noise level". A computer code has been written which computes equivalent noise levels for each of the time periods used in CNEL. Weighting these noise levels and summing them results in the CNEL for the traffic projections used. CNEL contours are found by iterating over many distances until the distance to 60, 65, and 70 CNEL contours are found. Mitigation through the design and construction of a noise barrier (wall, berm, or combination wall/berm) is the most common way of alleviating traffic noise impacts. The effect of a noise barrier is critically dependent on the geometry between the noise source and the receiver. A noise barrier effect occurs when the "line of sight" between the source and receiver is penetrated by the barrier. The greater the penetration the greater the poise reduction. The FHWA model was also used here in computerized format to determine barrier heights. Exhibit t MESTRE GREVE ASSOCIATES Vicinity Map Mestre Greve Associates Villa Point Apartments Page 2 For interior noise analysis, the most direct way of computing the total noise reduction is through the use of the methodology published by the Federal Highway Administration ("Insulation of Buildings Against Highway Noise," FHWA-TS-77-202). This methodology consists of applying a' single number rating concept weighted for highway noise. The FHWA methodology incorporates the Exterior Wall Noise Rating scale (EWNR). This is similar to the more traditional Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating except that EWNR is specially weighted for highway noise sources by accounting for the specific frequency components of highway noise. The FHWA has published EWNR data for the noise reduction characteristics of various building elements and construction techniques. This noise attenuation data is based upon empirically derived data on construction materials in practice today. 4.0 UNMITIGATED NOISE EXPOSURE Future traffic volume for Pacific Coast Highway was obtained from Rich Edmonson of the City of Newport Beach Traffic Engineering Division on August 12, 1988. The future average daily traffic volume for the section of the roadway in the vicinity of the project is 51,000. A vehicle speed of 50 miles per hour was utilized. Truck mixes for each of the time periods used in the CNEL calculation are presented in Table 1. The traffic distribution estimates are based upon traffic surveys, and are considered typical for arterials in Southern California. Table 1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PER TIME OF DAY IN PERCENT OF ADT I/\ Yh ew, VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVENING NIGHT Automobile 75.51 12.57 9.34 Medium Truck 1.56 0.09 0.19 Heavy Truck 0.64 0.02 0.08 i Using the assumptions presente,,,� above, the future noise levels were computed. The results are reported here in Table 2 in terms of distances to the 60, 65, and 70 CNEL contours. These represent the distances from the centerline of the roadway to the contour value shown. Note that the values given in Table 2 do not take into account any future vehicle noise reduction assumptions to take into account the effects of legislation requiring quieter vehicles in the future. • Table 2_ - - - - — DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOURS ` FOR FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Mestre Greve Associates Villa Point Apartments Page 3 ROADWAY SEGMENT DISTANCE TO CNEL CONTOUR (FT) -70- -65- -60- Pacific Coast Highway 62 134 289 The project consists of multi -family units with first floor patios and second story balconies. Patios and balconies along Pacific Coast Highway and will be exposed to noise levels in excess of 65 CNEL. A worst case unmitigated noise exposure of 68.7 CNEL occurs at the south corner of Building 16, 125 feet from the centerline of Pacific Coast Highway. Mitigation measures are discussed in the next section. 5.0 EXTERIOR NOISE MITIGATION ColwlVatt �39 - For the patio and balcony areas which are exposed to noise levels greater than 65 CNEL some form It of noise mitigation is required. An effective method of reducing the traffic noise levels down to t� acceptable levels is with a noise barrier. Representative cross -sections along the Pacific Coast Highway (see Appendix for analysis data) were analyzed utilizing the FHWA Model to d_et_ermine the necessary noise barrier heights. The ssite plan for:theprojeci shows 6.0'-fo'ot continuous. blc& wall planned.alongPCH. The results of the cross section analysis indicate that the planned 6 foot wall will effectively__xeduce_patio area noise levels To below 65 C` L) Additional analysis of second floor units indicates that several balcony areas along-PCL wild deed individual Balcony batYiers_with a minimum height of'S.5 feet (asmeasured from the balcony -floor) id order to -meet the exterior noise standard imposed by the City. Bbctsnies Ynuiriq individifal-_53 foot barriers #e'shownitt WLbit 2 The noise barriers are required to have a surface density of at least 3.5 pounds per square foot, and have no openings or cracks. They may be constructed of wood studs with stucco exterior, 1/4 inch plate glass, 518 inch plexiglass, any masonry material, or a combination of these materials. Wood and other materials may be acceptable if properly designed as noise barrier. Balcony floors must be solid. Slat type balcony floors would not be acceptable. 6.0 INTERIOR NOISE MITIGATION The proposed project must comply with the interior noise standard of 45 CNEL. To comply with the interior noise standard the buildings must provide sufficient outdoor to indoor building attenuation to reduce the noise levels down to acceptable levels. The outdoor to indoor noise reduction characteristics of a building are determined'by combining the transmission loss of each of the building elements which make up the building. Each unique building element has a characteristic transmission loss. For residential units the critical building elements are the roof, Mestre Greve Associates Villa Point Apartments Page 4 walls, windows, doors, attic configuration and insulation. The total noise reduction achieved is dependent on the transmission loss of each element and the. area of that- element in relation to -the total surface area of the room. Room absorption is the final factor used in determining the total noise reduction. , The second story units along Pacific Coast Highway will experience maximum exterior noise levels of 68.7 CNEL. To meet the interior noise standard of 45 CNEL, these buildings must provide an outdoor to indoor building attenuation of 23.7 dB. Detailed engineering calculations which - demonstrate the noise reduction levels are necessary for residential building attenuation requirements of greater than 20 dB. The construction specifications for this project which were utilized in estimating the outdoor to indoor noise reduction are presented below. The pertinent construction details were obtained from the architectural plans. Roofs are attic space construction and incorporate concrete file on the exterior and gypsum drywall on the interior surface. Attic spaces are insulated and vented. Roofs are sloped. Exterior walls have 7/8 inch stucco finish and 1/2 inch gypsum drywall on their interior. All exterior walls include insulation in the stud cavity. Windows consist of single strength glass in both fixed and sliding aluminum frames. Sliding glass doors and french doors consist of 3/16" tempered glass. To assess compliance of the project with the 45 CNEL interior noise standard, a worst case room for each building plan was selected for analysis. In general, the worst case room is the second story corner room with the greatest amount of window area. Comer rooms have more exterior surface area for noise infiltration. Rooms with large window area have the least noise reduction, because windows typically are acoustically the weakest part of the structure. Table 3 displays a sample of the building element areas and EWNR values with upgrades used to compute the total noise reduction. The total outdoor to indoor noise reductions are also given in Table 3. Mestre Greve Associates Villa Point Apartments Page 5 Table 3 — DATA -USED TO COMPUTE — - - -- THE EXTERIOR TO INTERIOR NOISE REDUCTION BUILDING AREA EWNR TOTALNOISE ELEMENT (SQ. FT.) REDUCTION PLAN 1- Master Bedroom, 2nd Floor Comer Room Window, Operable 18 22 Window, Fixed 10 26 French Door 17 24 Wall 99 40 ' Roof 168 36 24.8 dB PLAN 1 - Living Room, 2nd Floor Corner Room Window, Operable 30 22 Sliding Glass Door 43 25 Wall 156 40 Roof 239 36 25.7 dB PLAN 7 - Master Bedroom, 2nd Floor Comer Room Window, Operable 20 22 Wall 108 40 ( Roof 144 36 26.0 dB W PLAN 7 - Bedroom #2, 2nd Floor Corner Room Window, Operable 20 22 Wall 160 40 Roof -- 126 36 26.5 dB PLAN 7 - Living Room, 2nd Floor Comer Room Window, Operable 10 22 Sliding Glass Door 53 25 Wall 164 40 Roof 294 36 27.z d The results in Table 3 show that the total noise reduction with windows closed for each building is greater than the maximum required attenuation (23.7 dB). Thus, the buildings in the project will meet the interior noise standard of 45 CNEL assuming windows are closed. In order to assume that windows can remain closed to achieve this required attenuation, adequate ventilation with windows closed must be provided per Uniform Building Code. This can be achieved with a mechanical ventilation system to provide fresh air. The system must supply two air changes per hour to each habitable room including 20% fresh make-up air obtained directly from the outside. The fresh air inlet duct shall be of sound attenuating construction and shall consist of a Mestre Greve Associates Villa Point Apartments Page 6 _ minimum of ten -feet of straight or curved duct,. -or six feet -plus one sharp 90 degree bend. -Air conditioning is an adequate substitution for mechanical ventilation as long as it meets the UBC requirements (consult the mechanical___engineer for further details). Mechanical ventilation is i Mestre Greve Associates Villa Point Apartments Page 7 APPENDIX "— DATA USED TO DESIGN BALCONY NOISE BARRIERS _ — " Bid .# Road Elevation Distance To Wall Base Of Wail Dist. To Pad Observer Elevation Observer Height 18 0 770 9 175 9 5 17 0 130 9 135 9 5 16 0 135 9 140 9 5 10 0 155 9 160 9 5 108 0 177 9 182 9 5 11 0 165 9 170 9 5 15 0 180 9 185 9 5 0 s