The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3216-3222 E COAST HWY_LAMBORGHINIi Planning Commission Meeting.-JuiA. 1991 Agenda Item No. 2 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: A. Site Plan Review No. 64 (Public Hearing) Request to allow the construction of a one-story structure on property located in the'C-1 District of the Corona del Mar Specific Area Plan where a Specific Plan has not yet been adopted. The application also includes modifications to the Zoning Code so as to allow the new construction and an existing 7 foot high wrought iron fence to encroach 10 feet into the required 10 foot rear yard setback adjacent to an alley, and the .new construction to encroach 5 feet into the required 5 foot rear yard setback adjacent to a residential lot. B. Use Permit No. 3419 (Public Hearing) Request to permit the establishment of a facility specializing in the sale of automobiles with on -site repairs and the use of a portion of the on -site parking to be utilized for outdoor display of used vehicles for sale. The proposed development includes the construction of a 17 foot± high building on the westerly portion of the subject property adjacent to the alley which will house a facility for automobile detailing and minor maintenance and repairs. & ►ub C. Resubdivision No. 958 (Public Hearing) Request to combine two lots into a single building site for commercial purposes. LOCATION: Lots 2 and 3, Tract No. 1045, located at 3216-3222' East Coast Highway, on the northeasterly side of East Coast Highway between Larkspur Avenue and Marguerite Avenue, in Corona del Mar. ZONE: C-1 TO: Pl. g Commission - 2. APPLICANT. Tony Carlini, Newport Beach OWNER: Same as applicant Applications These applications involve a request to permit the construction of a one story structure on property located in the C-1 District of the Corona del Mar Specific Area Plan where a Specific Plan has not yet been adopted. In accordance with Section 20.60.060 of the Municipal Code, developments in areas that are designated for Specific Area Plans for which a Specific Plan has not been adopted, require the approval of a Site Plan Review in each case. The applicable Site Plan Review procedures are set forth in Section 20.01.070 of the Municipal Code. The proposal also includes modifications to the Zoning Code so as to allow the retention of an existing 7 foot high wrought iron fence to encroach 10 feet into the required 10 foot rear yard setback adjacent to an alley, and the construction of the new building so as to encroach 5 feet into the required 5 foot rear yard setback adjacent to a residential lot and 9± feet into the required 10 foot rear yard setback adjacent to an alley. Modification procedures are set forth in Chapter 20.81 of the Municipal Code. The applicant is also requesting approval of a use permit so as to allow the establishment of a facility specializing in the sale of automobiles with on -site repairs and the use of a portion of the on -site parking to be utilized for outdoor display of used vehicles for sale. The proposed development includes the construction of a 17 foot± high building on the northeasterly portion of the subject property, adjacent to the alley which will house a facility for automobile detailing and minor maintenance and repairs. Use Permit procedures are set forth in Chapter 20.80 of the Municipal Code. The proposal also includes a request to resubdivide the subject property so as to combine two lots into a single building site for commercial purposes. Resubdivision procedures are set forth in Section 19.12.040 of the Municipal Code. Environmental Significance This project has been reviewed, and it has been determined that it is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act under Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). Conformance with the General Plan The Corona del Mar commercial strip, of which the subject property is a part, is designated for "Retail and Service Commercial" land use, and has a maximum floor area ratio of 0.5/0.75. The proposed development is a permitted use within this land use designation and conforms with the allowable Floor Area Ratio of 0.5 for Base FAR Uses. It should be TO: Planning Commission - 3. further noted that automobile sales and repair facilities are designated as Base FAR Uses in Chapter 20.07 of the Municipal Code. Subject Property and Surrounding Land Uses The subject property is comprised of two lots, one of which is developed with a commercial building containing approximately 2,778± square feet of floor area and which has previously been used for an auto repair facility. To the north, is a commercial dry cleaners; to the northeast, is a duplex; to the southeast, across a 14 foot wide alley is a duplex and along East Coast Highway is the Quiet Woman Restaurant; and to the southwest, across East Coast Highway, is the First Interstate Bank and the Studio Cafe. Background According to the Business License records, the existing building on the site was originally occupied by Whitman's Garage, and used exclusively as an automotive repair facility. On January 15, 1980, the Modifications Committee approved a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow alterations and additions to the existing building which was nonconforming with regards to off-street parking. At its meeting of March 6, 1980, the Planning Commission sustained the action of the Modifications Committee; however, the approved alterations and additions were never constructed. On September 1, 1982, the Grand Garage took over the operation and obtained a business license to sell retail items in conjunction with the automotive use. In 1984, Superformance took over the auto repair business and at its meeting of January 24, 1985, the Planning Commission approved Use Permit No. 3130 which permitted the expansion of the auto repair facility and the establishment of an auto sales facility on the adjoining property located northerly of the building. Said approval was granted with the findings and subject to the conditions set forth in the attached excerpt of the Planning Commission minutes Dated January 24, 1985. It should be noted that staff has allowed the applicant to sore automobiles on the site while he continues through the review process, because of the previous auto sales use on the property. However, no car sales will be conducted until the subject application has been approved. Analysis The applicant is now proposing to convert the existing auto repair building into an exotic automobile display area and construct a new 1,166± sq.ft. building in the northwesterly corner of the site which will be used for auto detailing and minor maintenance of vehicles, and will contain an existing automobile wash rack and one maintenance bay. In addition to automobile sales and maintenance, the facility will also include the sale of motoring accessories such as seat covers, chrome rims, radar detectors, specialized tires, etc., which will occupy approximately 500± square feet of the auto display building. The applicant is also proposing to sell automotive art such as sculptures and paintings which will be located on the walls of the vehicle display area. The applicant is also proposing to continue the TO: Planning Commission - 4. display of used automobiles on the northerly portion of the site as currently permitted under the previous Use Permit No. 3130. The facility will have a maximum of three employees and will be open from 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. daily. The following outline has been prepared which sets forth the major characteristics of the project: Land Area: 8,397± sq.ft. Maximum Floor Area Permitted (0.5 FAR): 4,198± sq.ft. Existing Gross Floor Area: 2,778± sq.ft. Proposed Gross Floor Area: 3,944± sq.ft. Proposed Floor Area Ratio: 0.47' Building Setbacks: Existing Building Required Exi tin Proposed Front: (E. Coast Hwy.) 0 ft. 0 ft. unchanged Southerly Side: 0 ft. 0 ft. unchanged Northerly Side: 0 ft. 51± ft. unchanged Rear: (alley) 10 ft. 3± ft.' unchanged Proposed Building Front: (E. Coast Hwy.) 0 ft. 75± ft. Northerly Side: 0 ft. 0 ft. in s Rear: (alley) 10 ft. 12± Rear: (residential property line) 5 ft. 0 ft. Required Off -Street Parking: Proposed Off -Street Parking: See discussion below 8 Spaces 'The Floor Area Ratio for the existing facilities is split because the site is comprised of two lots. The northerly lot has a 0 FAR and the southerly lot has a .96 FAR. 2ne attached site plan incorrectly shows the existing building as being built on the rear property line adjacent to the alley. Me attached site plan incorrectly indicates the new building will be located on the alley property line; however, the applicant has indicated that the new building will be located inside of the existing wrought iron fence. Therefore, the new building will maintain a 12± inch alley setback. TO: Planning Commission - 5. Permitted Building Height: Height of Existing Building: Height of Proposed Building: Required Off -Street Parking 32/50 Height Limitation District 16± ft. 17 ft. The Municipal Code does not have any specific parking requirement for automobile sales and maintenance facilities. However, the Code would require five parking spaces for each service bay located in an automobile service station and one parking space for each 250 square feet office or retail floor area. Based on these requirements, the proposed facility would require 5 parking spaces for the one maintenance bay and 3 parking spaces for the combination of 135± square feet of office area and 500± square feet of floor area devoted to retail sales of auto accessories, or a total of 8 parking spaces (635± sq.ft. _ 2.5 or 3 spaces + 5 spaces = 8 spaces). As shown on the proposed parking plan (copy attached), the applicant is proposing to provide 8 parking spaces on the property for employees and customers. Considering the facility will be selling Lamborginis and there are only three employees, that leaves five parking spaces for customers. It should also be noted that the previous auto sales and repair facility was required to provide only 7 parking spaces. 5�pecific Standards for Development In accordance with the provisions of Chapter 20.60 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, the review of site plans have specific standards of review as established in Section 20.60.060 of said Chapter. Each standard is listed below, with a brief discussion of the project as it relates to each. 1. Sites subject to Site Plan Review under the provisions of Chapter 20.01 shall be graded and developed with due regard for the aesthetic qualities of the natural terrain, harbor, and landscape, giving special consideration to waterfront resources and unique landforms such as coastal bluffs or other sloped areas; trees and shrubs shall not be indiscriminately destroyed: The proposed project is located within the existing commercial strip of Corona del Mar which contains no unusual or sensitive land forms such as coastal bluffs or other slope areas nor are there any trees or shrubs on - site. 2. Development shall be compatible with the character of the neighborhood and surrounding sites and shall not be detrimental to the orderly and harmonious development of the surroundings and of the City. The Corona del Mar commercial strip is developed with a mixture of office, retail and service related commercial development. Most of the development in the area is either one or two story construction. The proposed automobile maintenance building and the proposed TO: Planning Commission - 6. automobile sales facility is in keeping with the general character of the area. It should also be noted that the already completed facade improvements to the existing building and front security fence are a significant improvement to the general appearance of the site (see attached photographs). 3. Development shall be sited and designed to maximize protection of public views, with special consideration given to views from public parks and from roadways designated as Scenic Highways and Scenic Drives in the Recreation and Open Space Element of the General Plan: There are no view parks or roadways designated as a Scenic Highway or Drive in the vicinity of the project. 4. Environmentally sensitive areas shall be preserved and protected. No structures or landform alteration shall be permitted in environmentally sensitive areas unless specific mitigation measures are adopted which will reduce adverse impacts to an acceptable level or the Planning Commission or City Council, on review or appeal, finds that the benefits outweigh the adverse impacts. There are no environmentally sensitive areas within the subject property. 5. No structures shall be permitted in areas of potential geologic hazard unless specific mitigation measures are adopted which will reduce adverse impacts to an acceptable level or the Planning Commission or City Councii, on review or appeal, finds that the benefits outweigh the adverse impacts. The site is not located in an area of particular geologic hazard, other than the seismic hazards common to the Southern California area. 6. Site plan and layout of buildings, parking areas, pedestrian and vehicular access ways, and other site features shall give proper consideration to functional aspects of site development: The subject property is irregular in shape and has its frontage on East Coast Highway. Therefore, vehicular access to the on -site parking area has traditionally been restricted to the rear alley. However, there is an existing 23± foot wide driveway apron on East Coast Highway which has provided vehicular access to the building when it was used for auto repair. The applicant intends to retain this vehicular access in conjunction with his indoor automobile display area. All other vehicular access to the site will be from the rear alley. It is also noted that the City Traffic Engineer is suggesting that the existing driveway be narrowed to 10 feet so as to align with the opening of the building. Staff has included such a condition in the attached Exhibit "A." Proposed Rear Yard Building Encroachment Adjacent to 'R" Classified Proper1y As indicated in the previous outline, the new automobile maintenance building is to be located at the rear of the site and is proposed to encroach 5 feet into the required five foot rear yard setback adjacent to the "R" classified property. The proposed encroachment is primarily for the efficient TO: Planning Commission - 7. development of the site, considering its irregular shape and limited access. However, the applicant also desires to keep the front portion of the site open for automobile display. Staff has no objections to such an encroachment inasmuch as the proposed building will act as a visual screen and noise buffer for the residential property which has a second floor patio deck which faces the subject property. It is also noted that in many cases when the five foot setback is provided, such areas become locations for unsightly storage and the accumulation of trash and debris. Proposed Rear Yard Building and Fence Encroachment Adjacent to Allev The new automobile maintenance building is proposed to encroach 9± feet into the required 10 foot rear yard setback and the existing wrought iron fence currently encroaches 9 feet 6± inches. Again, the purpose for these encroachments are for efficiency of development of an irregular shaped site. The applicant's argument of support for the alley encroachments is based on the fact that there are already two utility poles and a supporting guy wire located within the alley, which are directly adjacent to the proposed building and existing fence location. Therefore, the required ten foot setback would not provide any additional vehicular circulation or delivery area for commercial vehicles. It should also be noted that a previous wooden fence adjacent to the alley was previously reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission in conjunction with its approval of Use Permit 3130. The Planning Department staff concurs with the applicant in this case, inasmuch as the existing utility poles already block any effective use of the setback area for vehicular maneuvering or commercial deliveries. However, the Public Works Department is suggesting that a 5 foot setback be provided inasmuch as a majority of the other buildings adjacent to the same side of the alley, provide two to three foot setbacks. For the reasons previously stated, the Planning Department does not agree that a 5 foot setback will be of any public benefit. Should the Planning Commission wish to require the proposed building to be set back 5 feet from the alley property line, the following Finding No. 16 and Condition No. 7 for Site Plan Review No. 64, which are contained in the attached Exhibit "A," should be replaced with the following finding and condition: Finding: 16. That the approval of the modification to allow a 5 foot building and fence encroachment into the rear yard setback adjacent to the 'V classified property and a 5 foot building and fence encroachment adjacent to the northerly alley, will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the 0 • TO: Planning Commission - 8. neighborhood or the general welfare of the City and that the proposed modification is consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of this Code. Condition: 7. That the proposed maintenance building shall be permitted a zero setback on the property line adjacent to the "R" classified property. Said building and the wrought iron fence shall be permitted a 5 foot setback from the property line adjacent to the northerly alley. 7. Development shall be consistent with specific General Plan and applicable Specific Area Plan policies and objectives, and shall notpreclude the implementation of those policies and objectives: As discussed in the General Plan Compliance section, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. 8. Development shall be physically compatible with the development site, taking into consideration site characteristics including, but not limited to, slopes, submerged areas, and sensitive resources: As indicated previously, the subject property does not have any unusual characteristics or sensitive resources which must be protected. 9. When feasible, electrical and similar mechanical equipment and trash and storage areas shall be concealed: The suggested conditions of approval include adequate provisions to insure the screening of electrical service and mechanical equipment. 10. Archaeological and historical resources shall be protected to the extent feasible: There are no archeological or historical resources on -site. 11. Commercial development shall not have significant adverse effects on residences in an abutting residential district: As indicated previously, the proposed project has been designed so as to minimize any adverse effect on the surrounding residential property by locating the proposed building so as to be a visual screen and a sound buffer to the existing duplex located on the property to the northeast. Proposed Resubdivision As previously mentioned, the subject property is comprised of a 5,370 square foot lot and a 3,027 square foot lot, which the applicant is proposing to combine into a single building site. In accordance with the Newport Beach Subdivision Code, the combining of lots and the elimination of interior common property lines requires the approval of a resubdivision. The new parcel will contain approximately 8,397± square feet. Staff has no objections to the proposed resubdivision inasmuch as the combining of the lots will bring the site into conformance with the Floor Area Ratio provisions of the Zoning Code. TO: Planning Commission - 9. nclusions and Specific Findings As provided in Section 20.60.060 B of the Newport Beach Municipal Code the approval of a Site Plan Review requires that the Planning Commission make certain findings in order to approve a Site Plan Review. Section 20.80.060 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code provides that in order to grant any use permit, the Planning Commission shall find that the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use or building applied for will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. Section 19.12.040 (D) of the Municipal Code provides that in order to approve a resubdivision, the Planning Commission shall determine that it is satisfied with the plan of subdivision, that the map is in conformity with the requirements of Title 19, all ordinances of the City and all applicable general and specific plans. Should the Planning Commission wish to approve theses applications, the findings and conditions of approval set forth in the attached Exhibit "A" are suggested. Should the Planning Commission wish to deny Site Plan Review No. 64 and Use Permit No. 3419 the finding set forth in the attached Exhibit "B" are suggested. In accordance with Section 66474 of the Subdivision Map Act, a legislative body of a city or county shall deny approval of a tentative map, or a parcel map for which a tentative map was not required, if it makes any of the following findings: (a) That the proposed map is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is not physically suitable for the density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. • TO: Planning Commission - 10. It is staffs opinion that none of the above findings may be reasonably made in this case, and therefore no findings for denial for Resubdivision No. 958 have not been included in the attached Exhibit 'B". PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director )00 WMM -- Seniorwi War Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Vicinity Map Excerpt of the Planning Commission minutes dated January 24, 1985 Proposed Parking Plan Photographs Site Plan, Floor Plans and Elevations Tentative 'Parcel Map BILL W\UP\SPR64 TO: Planning Commission - 11. • EXHIBIT 'W' FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 64, USE PERMIT NO 3419 AND RESUBDIVISION NO 958 A. Site Plan Review No. 64 Findin 1 That 'development of the subject property will not preclude implementation of specific General Plan objectives and policies. 2. That the value of property is protected by preventing development characterized by inadequate and poorly planned landscaping, excessive building bulk, inappropriate placement of structures and failure to preserve where feasible natural landscape features, open spaces, and the like, resulting in the impairment of the benefits of occupancy and use of existing properties in such area. 3. That benefits derived from expenditures of public funds for improvement, acquisition and beautification of streets, parks, and other public facilities are maximized by the exercise of reasonable controls over the layout and site location characteristics of the proposed development. 4. That unique site characteristics are protected in order to ensure that the community may benefit from the natural terrain, harbor and ocean, to preserve and stabilize the natural terrain, and to protect the environmental resources of the City. 5. That the site does not contain any unique landforms such as coastal bluffs. 6. That the development is compatible with the character of the neighborhood and will contribute to the orderly and harmonious development of surrounding properties and the City. 7. That there are no unique site characteristics or environmentally sensitive areas on - site which should be protected. 8. The property does not contain any areas of unique geologic hazards. 9. The development is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Newport Beach. 10. That there are no archeological or historical resources on -site. 11. That the proposed development has been designed so as to prevent any adverse effect on the adjoining residential property. TO: Planning Commission - 12. 12. That the design of the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed development. 13. That public improvements may be required of the applicant per Section 19.08.1020 of the Municipal Code and Section 66415 of the Subdivision Map Act. 14. The project will substantially comply with all applicable City and State Building Codes and Zoning requirements for new buildings applicable to the district in which the proposed project is located. 15. Adequate off-street parking and related vehicular circulation are being provided in conjunction with the proposed development. 16. That the approval of the modification to allow the requested building and existing fence encroachments into the rear yard setbacks adjacent to the "R" classified property and adjacent to the northerly alley, will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City and that the proposed modification is consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of this Code. Conditions: 1. That the proposed development shall be in substantial compliance with the approved site plan, floor plans, elevations and parking plan, except as noted below. 2. That there shall be a minimum of 8 parking spaces provided on the subject property. 3. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review by the City Traffic Engineer. 4. That the existing driveway apron on East Coast Highway shall be narrowed to 10± feet in width so as to align with the opening in the front of the building. 5. That the delivery and/or the pick-up of vehicles for sale shall be restricted to the site, or where no alternative exists, in the alley. No such deliveries shall take place on East Coast Highway, Larkspur Avenue or Marguerite Avenue. 6. That all employees at the facility shall park on -site. 7. That the proposed maintenance building shall be permitted a zero setback on the property line adjacent to the "R" classified property and shall be located directly inside and adjacent to the existing wrought iron fence located on the property line adjacent to the northerly alley. TO: Planning Commission - 13. 8. That all conditions of approval of Use Permit No. 3419 and Resubdivision No. 958 shall be fulfilled. 9. That all signs shall be in conformance with the provisions of Chapter 20.06 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code unless an exception permit is approved by the City. Said signs shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer if located adjacent to the vehicular ingress and egress to the site. 10. That existing and proposed exterior lighting for the proposed project shall be designed and installed in a manner so as to conceal the light source and minimize light and glare to the adjoining residential properties and East Coast Highway. 11. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be screened from East Coast Highway, the alley and adjoining properties. 12. That no outdoor loudspeaker or paging system shall be permitted in conjunction with the proposed facility. 13. That all vehicle maintenance and detailing shall be confined to the interior of the maintenance building. 14. That car washing shall be restricted to the interior of the maintenance building only and must be provided in such a way as to insure direct drainage of wash water into the sewer system and not into the storm drains. 15. That the hours of operation shall be limited between 10:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. daily. 16. That this Site Plan Review shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Section 20.60.060 H of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. B. UsP Permit No. 3419 Fin in 1. That the proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and is compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. That the establishment, maintenance of operation of the use of the property or building will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of -such proposed use or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. TO: Planning Commission - 14. Conditions: 1. That the proposed development shall be in substantial compliance with the approved site plan, floor plans, elevations and parking plan, except as noted below. 2. That all conditions of approval of Site Plan Review No. 64 and Resubdivision No. 958 shall be fulfilled. 3. That the Planning Commission may add to or modify conditions of approval to this Use Permit or recommend to the City Council the revocation of this Use Permit, upon a determination that the operation which is the subject of this Use Permit, causes injury, or is detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the community. 4. That this Use Permit shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Section 20.80.090A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. C. Resubdivision No. 958 Fin in 1. That the design of the subdivision improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 2. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City, all applicable general or specific plans and the Planning Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision. 3. That the proposed resubdivision presents no problems from a planning standpoint. 4. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 19.08.120 of the Municipal Code and Section 66415 of the Subdivision Map Act. Conditions: 1. That a parcel map shall be recorded prior to occupancy of the new maintenance building. The Parcel Map shall be prepared so that the bearings relate to the State Plane Coordinate System. Monuments (one inch iron pipe with tag) shall be set on each lot corner unless otherwise approved by the Subdivision Engineer. Monuments shall be protected in place if installed prior to completion of construction project. 2. That all improvements shall be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. TO: Planning Commission - 15. 3. That arrangements be made with the Public Works Department in order to guarantee satisfactory completion of the public improvements, if it is desired to record a parcel map or obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public improvements. 4. That the two 3± inch diameter drains through the planter wall outletting onto the East Coast Highway sidewalk shall be removed and put into parkway drains, per City Std. 184-L, that outlets through the curb into East Coast Highway. 5. That an 8 inch thick slab of concrete shall be placed in the alley setback area adjacent to the northeasterly side of the existing structure. 6. That the spall section of concrete sidewalk on East Coast Highway shall be reconstructed. All work within the East Coast Highway frontage shall be completed under an encroachment permit issued by the California Department of Transportation and all work within the alley shall be completed under an encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. 7. That overhead utilities serving the site shall be undergrounded to the nearest appropriate pole in accordance with Section 19.24.140 of the Municipal Code. 8. That all conditions of approval of Site Plan Review No. 64 and Use Permit No. 3419 shall be fulfilled. 9. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map has not been recorded within 3 years of the date of approval, unless an extension is granted by the Planning Commission. TO: Planning Commission - 16. EXHIBIT 'B" FINDINGS FOR DENIAL OF SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 64 AND USE PERMIT NO 3419 A. Site Plan Review No, 64: 1. That the development is not compatible with the character of the neighborhood and surrounding sites and will be detrimental to the orderly and harmonious development of the surrounding area. 2. That adequate parking is not being provided for the proposed development. B. I1 e Permit No. 3419: 1. That the approval of Use Permit No. 3419 will, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. SCALE OF FEET o Iro uo coo ew • VICI�IJ IT'S' u NA&1 E . AP NO. !6 _. n 6 � y / / n PAP . \ / h P�• .. \ Ci �i� 09•? 90� 9 41 pP� q 9c ry Apo 9, v 9.� t rti J c; 9r V S" Sze. B 0 N Tqo ''a. Ih EAST ✓rrr/ SlE MAP A/O. /B qs q.2 A 1 xJ , JJJ I 'o M i girls %�NVJ�VJ• Itm Aa.gSl now o: 6 Iza ,Mz /m RSAMLJ Rr or .m roz. aro .w 1117 6Yw S•JCt N'iJG. v.G xa w. nn vr; au. MA M 89.9r AFMi. ro m I tort 9, s. c. DISTRICTING MAP NEW WPORT BEACH — CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL R-] RESTO MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL —'—� 'J SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL C-1 C-2 LIGHT COMMERCIAL GENERAL COMMERCIAL �Z DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL FAMILY RESIDENTIAL M-1 MANUFACTURING ;MULTIPLE ra ........�w�—'..'.re r--U 1 UNCLASSIFIED i Mo. IM.90-R 1 "MI. ro F & 1 I ^fr. C.O0.fM. .o w ro.0 aono wv IF OR O NO, 132 OCO Hp.ItIM SITE PLAN vc�w Hot (0+; 6�. PenAtT . 3419,MD R .S067 M 95 �1 ' I'HouR I'NoU(e WALLd La — 9 S�NyER 3d�N• I•NoIIK �A�Ar�r ON. a/�Eo �xrr `b HOW. NEw F.F. a IOD A, 0" F Ibo,oajII�II ncl i�r„ —u ems. SKriVn HT Me)12EFER• r roq PLAN o� Iq °W.x &4, SHr•KIL, In qmoaf�&T,.3rw I3U ILT• Ur-aAvvLE (TYFI 0 `-Exl�iltiJro ��LT N I3UIL?•Up IZcarllJG" Fxi!z 7 eH'r � � 119) ReFerz exI6TIN� 7�o"N• � W I• FeNoe f a,wN� G.t1e. ALA-g•i �c KIe6A Idol. 1212 tGATuI gA�N � • PaUAL Uaa� AZPMQ&I E DISPLAY AMA ' I I'I.AN?Br• i iiYl• r/O� . I qu pv.o. p,pE• II �CNDh'�Ii�Uf�N i�J.N7ER GONG, �1vBWALIc 4 WAU.J. HNnepRU�JE(X�Ib-T�l{4.ltl LII GI�R�d PELK� �1'IY 6iAilG> U217+N. ext-ralTla-0 ImiILvINro 6)eI4,TWG P>rTo014AIN • FF. = iml, q¢. oo F6rEF T°5NT$2 Me rUrtl}Iag H"ro• FOP TM, tAy• LIRE oP WjIf TiNGI pAFAPE'f WALL T& j�r4A�N 4) mTm PHOTOGRAPHS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING fo %AMISSK)NERS r- x - �o z c m> m z m a a z r o= sm o ma m m c l�/of z M z a z m m January 24, 1985 0 Beach —. 6. That a washout area for trash containers be provided in such a way as to allow direct drainage into the sewer system and not into the Bay or the storm drains. 7. That kitchen exhaust fans be designed to control odors and smoke. 8. That all trash or storage shall be located within the building or be screened from \adjoining streets, the alley, or adjacent 9. That a rash compactor shall be installed. 10. That the hou of operation for the subject restaurant sha be from 5:30 P.M. to 12:00 midnight, da• y. MINUrF5 11. That the Planning Commi 'on may add/or modify Conditions of Approval to is use permit, or recommend to the City Council he revocation of this use permit, upon a dete 'nation that the operation, which is the subject f. this use permit, causes injury or is detrim tal to the health, safety or welfare of the community. 12. That this use permit shall expire if not exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Section 20.80.090 of. the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Use Permit No. 3130 (Public Hearing) Request to expand a former automotive repair facility located in the C-1 District. The proposal also Item #9 Use Permit No. 3130 includes a request to establish an automobile sales facility which includes the construction of a related A2proved parking area and a covered wash area. LOCATION: Lots 2 and 3, Tract No. 1045, located at 3216 and 3222 East Coast Highway, on the northeasterly side of East Coast Highway between Larkspur Avenue and Marguerite Avenue, in Corona Del Mar. -29- AD ROLL CC)MMISSIONERS J� January 24, 1985 Tlil VZ C m zX 9= z T m j City of Newport Beach ZONE: C-1 APPLICANT:Superformance, Corona Del Mar OWNER: Rypinski Family Trust, Costa Mesa Commissioner Goff asked staff to comment on the reason why seven off-street parking spaces would be adequate for five employees, which would leave a balance of only two parking spaces for the public. The public hearing opened in connection with this item, and Mr. David Hirson, 1201 Dove St. Newport Beach, appeared before the Planning Commission as a representative of the applicant. Mr. Hirson commented that additional customer parking spaces are not required because the garage has a pick-up and delivery service for the customer's automobile, and four automobiles is the maximum number serviced each day. Also, one of the facility's automobiles is out everyday to pick-up and deliver customers, automobiles or automobile parts. MINUTES Mr. Hirson stated that in reference to Condition No. 9, that the applicant should not be responsible for any alterations to the structure as the applicant is leasing the building. In reference to Condition No. 11, Mr. Hirson stated that the applicant believes that there is an existing use permit for one of the subject lots for auto repair. Mr. Hewicker replied that the previous use permit is no longer in effect. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Kurlander, Mr. Hirson replied that the applicant has a single eight -year lease on both parcels of land. Mr. Hewicker advised Mr. Hirson that if one of the uses in the stated use permit would change, then the applicant could return to the City for a change in conditions. Mr. Hewicker advised the applicant that Condition No. 9 can be changed to read "that the applicant or owner shall make all necessary alterations". Commissioner Goff confirmed that he is not satisfied with the seven on -site parking spaces. Mr. Dick Nichols appeared before the Planning Commission, opposing the application because of the lack of parking spaces. Commissioner Person commented that Condition No. 15 allows the Planning Commission to L -30- 10 January 24, 1985 t• MINUTES F F C O = A v 1 a r O m z c m> m z C 1 Z (n Z. �; O O A m o m 9 T T Z A z A z M m I Motion Substitute Motion Ayes Noes of Newport Beach revoke the use permit if thorn are problems. City Attorney Burnham explained the meaning of Condition No. 15 to Mr. Nichols. The public hearing closed at this time. Commissioner Goff made a motion to continue Use ermit No. 3130 to February 21, 1985, so that the applicant would have time to seek additional parking spaces at an off -site location. Commissioner Turner made a substitute motion to approve Use Permit 3130, subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A', with a change in Condition No. 9 to read "that the applicant or owner shall make all necessary alterations". Commissioner Goff stated that he will not support the substitute motion because he believes that more than two parking spaces are necessary for the customers. Commissioner Koppelman stated that she will not be supporting the substitute motion because of the heavy traffic in the Marguerite Avenue and East Coast Highway area, and also that seven parking spaces are not adequate for the business. Mr. Hirson stated that the parking space ides could be area that is presently being used for two display used for additional customer parking. The substitute motion was voted on, and MOTION CARRIED. FINDINGS: 1. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, and is compatible with existing and surrounding land uses. 2. The proposed project will not have any significant environmental impact.. 3. The Police Department has indicated that they do not contemplate any problems. 4. The proposed off-street parking will be adequate to serve the auto sales and repair facility. 5. The approval of Use Permit No. 31.30 will not, under the circumstances of this case, be -31- p COMPAISSIONERS s s so = v " z c m m z OJ A A Z r O x C '2 A m O m Y T T 2 A Z A Z -n m January 24, 1985(0 of Newport Beach detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements �n the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. CONDITIONS• 1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan except as noted below. 2. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be screened from adjoining properties and from East Coast Highway. 3. That all repair and service activities shall be located inside the building. 4. That any exterior lighting shall be maintained in such a manner as to eliminate direct light and glare on adjoining properties and from East Coast Highway. A timing device shall turn off any lights at the rear of the site at 10:00 p.m. every night. S. No vehicle waiting for service shall be parked outside of the building for a period longer than twenty-four hours unless it is in the process of being serviced. No vehicle shall be considered to be in the process of being serviced for a period longer than one (1) week. 6. That the parking lot area shall be striped with approved traffic markers or painted white lines not less than 4 inches wide. 7. That all signs shall meet the requirements of. Chapter 20.06 of the Municipal Code. Signs indicating "for sale" or "lease" shall not be permitted in the windshield of the autos or else- where on the site. S. That car washing shall be restricted to the wash bay only and must be provided in such a way as to insure direct drainage of wash water into the sewer system and not into the storm drains. 9. That the applicant or owner shall make all necessary alterations to the existing structure as MINUTES M -32- �3 +•MMISSIONERS MINUTES + January 24, 1985 F o n c O = z c m o m Z z p z z° 9( City of Newport Beac INDEX required by the Building Department and Fire Department so as to comply with Section 503 of the Uniform Building Code (1979 Edition). 10. That a landscape plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department and the Planning Department. Said landscaping shall include the planting of shrubs or groundcover in planters along the front of the lot, and shall be continuously maintained. 11. That the subject lots shall be held in common during the life of the applicant's lease, and that severance of the lots shall constitute termination of the use permit. 12. That all improvements be constructed as required by ordinance and the Public Works Department. 13. That the on -site parking., vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review by the Traffic Engineer. 14. That sight distance be provided for vehicles exiting at the alley with the design to be approved by the Public Works Department. 15. That the Planning Commission may add and/or modify conditions of approval to this use permit, or recommend to the City Council the revocation of this use permit, upon a determination that the operation which is the subject of this use permit causes injury, or is detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the community. 16. This use permit shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Section 20.80.090 A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. -Use Permit No. 3131 (Public -Hearing) Request to permit the construction of ground identification signs for Newport Center on property located in the Open Space District, at the southeasterly and southwesterly corners of San Joaquin Hills Road and Santa Cruz Drive, and at the Item #10 Use Permit No. 3131 Approved -33- • COMMISSIONERS O�• A �� 4d d O�n iq�W c�.P��G Oq� M Y OF NEWPORT June 6, 1991 MINUTES W - — INDEX ROLL CALL 21. Landscaping along North Newport Boulevard shall conform to Std. 110-L unless otherwise approved by the Traffic Engineer and the Public Works Department. 22. That the proposed dwelling unit shall be sound attenuated to a maximum of 45 dBA CNEL for interior living areas and 65 CNEL for exterior living areas, as measured from the area expected to experience the highest sound levels. Measurement and certification of compliance with this condition shall be completed prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy by a registered engineer practicing in acoustics. 23. That the Planning Commission may add to or modify conditions of approval to this Use Permit or recommend to the City Council the revocation of this Use Permit, upon a determination that the operation which is the subject of this Use Permit, causes injury, or is detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the community. 24. That this use permit shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Section 20.80.090A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. r A Site Plan Review No 64 (Public Hearin el Item No.2 Request to allo• the construction of a one story structure on property located -,z the C-1 District of the Corona del Mar Specific Area Plan where -a Specific Plan has not yet been adopted. The application also includes modifications to the Zoning Code so as to allow the new construction and an existing 7 foot high wrought iron fence to encroach 10 feet into the required 10 foot rear yard setback adjacent to an alley, and the new construction to encroach 5 feet into the required 5 foot rear yard setback adjacent to a SPR 64 UP 3419 R 958 Approved residential lot. AND -10- . • MINUTES COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 ROLL CALL CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH B. Use Permit No 3419 (Public Hearing) Request to permit the establishment of a facility specializing in the sale of automobiles with on -site repairs and the use of a portion of the on -site parking to be utilized for outdoor display of used vehicles for sale. The proposed development includes the construction of a 17 foot± high building on the westerly portion of the subject property adjacent to the alley which will house a facility for automobile detailing and minor maintenance and repairs. 0 Request to combine two lots into a single building site for commercial purposes. Lots 2 and 3, Tract No. 1045, located at 3216- 3222 East Coast Highway, on the northeasterly side of East Coast Highway between Larkspur Avenue and Marguerite Avenue, in Corona del Mar. C-1 Tony Carlini, Newport Beach Same as applicant on Webb, City Engineer, indicated that th Public Works epartment recommended that a minimum 5 foot rear yard ;tback be provided adjacent to the alley. He explained that the )plicant and the Planning Department indicated that since the )wer poles and wrought iron fence exist adjacent to the alley that setback should not be required wherein he stated that the power ales and the fence are not as permanent as the building. Mr. /ebb stated that the property owner across the alley constructed residential building with a 12 foot rear yard setback whereby a 5 )ot setback is required, and said property owner could reconstruct building within 5 feet of the alley. He suggested that the -11- INDEX COMMISSIONERS A A IN GO2O d�cC poi • • June 6, 1991 MINUTES ROLL CALL -- - - — - - - - INDEX following finding and condition replace Site Plan Review No. 64, Finding No. 16 and Condition No. 7 as recommended by the Planning Department: Findin No. o. 16: That the approval of the modification to allow a 5 foot building and fence encroachment into the rear yard setback adjacent to the "R" classified property and a 5 foot building and fence encroachment adjacent to the northerly alley, will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City and that the proposed modification is consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of this Code. Condition No. 7: That the proposed maintenance building shall be permitted a zero setback on the property line adjacent to the "R" classified property. Said building and the wrought iron fence shall be permitted a 5 foot setback from the property line adjacent to the northerly alley. Commissioner Pomeroy and Mr. Webb discussed a photograph that was taken of the existing commercial building located on the alley. William Laycock, Current Planning Manager, explained that the subject building may have been constructed when the Zoning Code required setbacks 7 feet from the center line of an alley. Mr. Webb stated that it is difficult to maneuver an automobile in a 14 foot wide alley, and he addressed the 'V shaped alley. The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and Mr. Anthony Carlini, applicant, appeared before the Planning Commission. In response to questions posed by Chairman Debay, he concurred with the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A" and the aforementioned modified finding and condition. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Persdn, Mr. Carlini replied that two sales people will be employed• by the automobile dealership, and major automobile servicing will be located at another facility. -12- • MINUTES • COMMISSIONERS • June 6, 1991 q W CITY OF NEW ®R 0 BEACH ROLL CALL In response to a question posed by Commissioner Di Sano regarding the foregoing modified finding and condition, Mr. Carlini replied that the amended condition would prohibit him from constructing an automobile detailing area. He said that he measured setbacks in the alley and the result was that 2-1/2 foot setbacks exist on the lower level, and 1 foot setbacks at the second story level of adjoining buildings. Mr. Carlini explained that he could not understand how the community would be affected if he would be allowed to build where the fence currently exists, and the telephone poles remained on the alley. In further response to Commissioner Di Sano, Mr. Carlini explained that delivery trucks drive through the alley to the Quiet Woman Restaurant, and said trucks do not have difficulty maneuvering in the alley. He stated that the modified setback would prohibit him from full utilization of the property. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Edwards, Mr. Carlini explained that minor maintenance proposed by the establishment consists of installation of chrome wheels, seat covers, brake pads, steering wheel, lights, etc. He said that there would not be any engine work on the premises. Mr. Carlini stated that the neighbors have been complimentary of the remodeling, and the property would become a prestigious automobile franchise. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Merrill, Mr. Carlini stated that no automobile alarms or stereos would be installed in the automobiles and they would not test the equipment on the premises. Mr. Carlini explained that the vehicles arrive from the factory with alarms and stereos. Mr. Doug Ashton, 418-1/2 Larkspur Avenue, appeared before the Planning Commission. Mr. Ashton complimented the applicant on the property improvements, and he did not object to a new structure. He expressed concerns regarding noise emitting from radios or an outdoor speaker system, mechanical tools, or engines. He requested that customers not park automobiles in the alley. Chairman Debay addressed Condition No. 12 in Exhibit "A", Site Plan Review No. 64, regarding no outdoor loudspeaker or paging system. -13- • COMMISSIONERS • June 6, 1991 MINUTES' INDEX ROLL CALL In response to a question posed by Commissioner Edwards regarding alley parking, Mr. Ashton replied that there is a concern with respect to delivery trucks blocking the alley and stopping at the Quiet Woman Restaurant, and occasionally a restaurant customer will park in the alley late at night. In reference to vehicular access and circulation in the alley, Mr. Hewicker stated that staff observed on this date that when the neighbors park in the 2 or 3 foot rear yard setback adjacent to the alley, the automobiles overhang in the right-of-way. He further stated that the residents on the opposite side of the alley have setbacks to accommodate the egress/ingress and their automobiles are parked parallel in said setback. Commissioner Pomeroy stated that in addition to the foregoing Site Plan Review No. 64, Condition No. 12 in Exhibit "A" regarding noise, Condition No. 13 addresses vehicle maintenance and detailing, Condition No. 14 restricts car washing to the interior of the maintenance building, and Condition No. 15 limits the hours of operation between 10:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. daily. Commissioner Di Sano stated that the use permit could be recalled by the Planning Commission for review if noise from the facility would be detrimental to the neighborhood. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed at this time. In response to questions posed by Commissioner Edwards, Mr. Laycock replied that Base FAR uses include automobile repair facilities. Mr. Laycock further replied th-t Condition No. 15 in Exhibit "A", Site Plan Review No. 64, st tes that the operation would be allowed to operate between 10.)0 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., seven days a week. Commissioner Edwards expressed a concern regarding the proposed operating hours on Saturdays and Sundays. Commissioner Pomeroy suggested modified hours for maintenance and detailing from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. He indicated that the requested hours for sales would not interfere with the neighbors. Mr. Carlini reappeared before the Planning Commission and he explained that automobile detailing would be conducted Monday through Friday. Commissioner -14- U COMMISSIONERS N GOrOqp� June 6, 1991 MINUTES INDEX ROLL CALL 117 Pomeroy suggested that Condition No. 15 in Exhibit "A" , Site Plan Review No. 64, be modified to state That the hours of operation for automobile sales shall be limited between 10:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. daily. Automobile detailing and maintenance shall be limited between 10:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 10:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Saturday." Commissioner Di Sano suggested a No Parking sign in the alley behind the subject property. Mr. Carlini stated that he had previously considered said sign. Motion was made and voted on to approve Site Plan Review No. Motion * 64, Use Permit No. 3419, and Resubdivision No. 958, subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A", including Site Plan Review No. 64, modified Condition No. 15 regarding the hours of operation All Ayes and added Condition No. 17, regarding "No Parking" signs. MOTION -CARRIED. A. Site Plan Review No. 64 Findings: 1 That development of the subject property will not preclude implementation of specific General Plan objectives and policies. 2. That the value of property is protected by preventing development characterized by inadequate and poorly planned landscaping, excessive building bulk, inappropriate placement of structures and failure to preserve where feasible natural landscape features, open spaces, and the like, resulting in the impairment of the benefits of occupancy and use of existing properties in such area. 3. That benefits derived from expenditures of public funds for improvement, acquisition and beautification of streets, parks, and other public facilities are maximized by the exercise of reasonable controls over the layout and site location characteristics of the proposed development. -15- • COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH INDEX ROLL CALL 4. That unique site characteristics are protected in order to ensure that the community may benefit from the natural terrain, harbor and ocean, to preserve and stabilize the natural terrain, and to protect the environmental resources of the City. 5. That the site does not contain any unique landforms such as coastal bluffs. 6. That the development is compatible with the character of the neighborhood and will contribute to the orderly and harmonious development of surrounding properties and the City. 7. That there are no unique site characteristics or environmentally sensitive areas on -site which should be protected. ` 8. The property does not contain any areas of unique geologic hazards. 9. The development is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Newport Beach. 10. That there are no archeological or historical resources on - site. 11. That the proposed development has been designed so as to prevent any adverse effect on the adjoining residential property. 12. That the design of the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed development. 13. That public improvements may be required of the applicant per Section 19.08.1020 of the Municipal Code and Section 66415 of the Subdivision Map Act. -16- 0 COMMISSIONERS AAe �SO,O 0 Oi ROLL CALL 14. They and S build: proje 15. Adeq are 1 devel 16. That build setba to th this c comf work to_pr gene mod'. 20 of Conditions: 1. That com elev, 2. Thai on t. 3. Tha ped( by tl 4. Tha shal the 5. Tha shal • June'6, 1991 MINUTES project will substantially comply with all applicable City tate Building Codes and Zoning requirements for new .ngs applicable to the district in which the proposed et is located. uate off-street parking and related vehicular circulation )eing provided in conjunction with the proposed opment. the approval of the modification to allow the requested ing and existing fence encroachments into the rear yard cks adjacent to the'W classified property and adjacent e northerly alley, will not, under the circumstances of ase, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, ort, and general welfare of persons residing and ing in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious operty and improvements in the neighborhood or the ral welfare of the City and that the proposed fication is consistent with the legislative intent of Title this Code. the proposed development shall be in substantial )fiance with the approved site plan, floor plans, ttions and parking plan, except as noted below. there shall be a minimum of 8 parking spaces provided ae subject property. the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and ;strian circulation systems be subject to further review ie City Traffic Engineer. t the existing driveway apron on East Coast Highway I be narrowed to 10± feet in width so as to align with opening in the front of the building. t the delivery and/or the pick-up of vehicles for sale 1 be restricted to the site, or where no alternative exists, -17- INDEX COMMISSIONERS • June 6, 1991 MINUTES ROLL CALL 771 INDEX in the alley. No such deliveries shall take place on East Coast Highway, Larkspur Avenue or Marguerite Avenue. 6. That all employees at the facility shall park on -site. 7. That the proposed maintenance building shall be permitted a zero setback on the property line adjacent to the "R" classified property and shall be located directly inside and adjacent to the existing wrought iron fence located on the property line adjacent to the northerly alley. 8. That all conditions of approval of Use Permit No. 3419 and Resubdivision No. 958 shall be fulfilled. 9. That all signs shall be in conformance with the provisions of Chapter 20.06 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code unless an exception permit is approved by the City. Said signs shall -be approved by the City Traffic Engineer if located adjacent to the vehicular ingress and egress to the site. 10. That existing and proposed exterior lighting for the proposed project shall be designed and installed in a manner so as to conceal the light source and minimize light and glare to the adjoining residential properties and East Coast Highway. 11. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be screened from East Coast Highway, the alley and adjoining properties. 12. That no outdoor loudspeaker or paging system shall be permitted in conjunction with the proposed facility. 13. That all vehicle maintenance and detailing shall be confined to the interior of the maintenance building. 14. That car washing shall be restricted to the interior of the maintenance building only and must be provided in such a way as to insure direct drainage of wash water into the sewer system and not into the storm drains. -18- COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 �s wr A A/ 9 MINUTES CTY OFNEWPUK I VIC-Aun June 6, 1991 �s wr A A/ 9 MINUTES CTY OFNEWPUK I VIC-Aun INDEX ROLL CALL ffI 15. That the hours of operation for automobile sales shall be limited between 10:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. daily. Automobile detailing and maintenance shall be limited between 10:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 10:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Saturday. 16. That this Site Plan Review shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Section 20.60.060 H of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. 17. That the applicant shall install "no parking" signage adjacent to the alley. B. Use Permit No. 3419 Findings: 1. That the proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and is compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. That the establishment, maintenance of operation of the use of the property or building will not, under -the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. Conditions: 1. That the proposed development shall be in substantial compliance with the approved site plan, floor plans, elevations and parking plan, except as noted below. 2. That all conditions of approval of Site Plan Review No. 64 and Resubdivision No. 958 shall be fulfilled. 3. That the Planning Commission may add to or modify conditions of approval to this Use Permit or recommend to the City Council the revocation of this Use Permit, upon a -19- • COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES ROLL CALL determination that the operation which is the subject of this Use Permit, causes injury, or is detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the community. 4. That this Use Permit shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Section 20.80.090A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. C. Resubdivision No. 958 Findings: 1. That the design of the subdivision improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 2. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City, all applicable general or specific plans and the Planning Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision. That the proposed resubdivision presents no problems from a planning standpoint. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 19.08.120 of the Municipal Code and Section 66415 of the Subdivision Map Act. That a parcel map shall be recorded prior to occupancy of the new maintenance building. The Parcel Map shall be prepared so that the bearings relate to the State Plane Coordinate System. Monuments (one inch iron pipe with tag) shall be set on each lot corner unless otherwise approved by the Subdivision Engineer. Monuments shall be protected in place if installed prior to completion of construction project. -20- INDEX MINUTES COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH INDEX ROLL CALL 2. That all improvements shall be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 3. That arrangements be made with the Public Works Department in order to guarantee satisfactory completion of the public improvements, if it is desired to record a parcel map or obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public improvements. 4. That the two 3± inch diameter drains through the planter wall outletting onto the East Coast Highway sidewalk shall be removed and put into parkway drains, per City Std. 184- L, that outlets through the curb into East Coast Highway. 5. That an 8 inch thick slab of concrete shall be placed in the alley setback area adjacent to the northeasterly side of the existing structure. _ 6. That the spall section of concrete sidewalk on East Coast Highway shall be reconstructed. All work within the East Coast Highway frontage shall be completed under an encroachment permit issued by the California Department of Transportation and all work within the alley shall be completed under an encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. 7. That overhead utilities serving the site shall be undergrounded to the nearest appropriate pole in accordance with Section 19.24.140 of the Municipal Code. 8. That all conditions of approval of Site Plan Review No. 64 and Use Permit No. 3419 shall be fulfilled. 9. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map has not been recorded within 3 years of the date of approval, unless an extension is granted by the Planning Commission. -21- L-IR �"11borryh-1" .D July. 23, 1991 City Of Newport Beach 3300.Newport-Blvd. Newport Beach, CA. i_ 92663 LETTER OF INTENT This letter is to notify the City Of Newport Beach, CA., that - I,*Tony Carlini, owner of Pacifica Lamborghini'located at'3222 East Coast Highway, Corona Del Mar, .CA.. intend, to, comply- with. , the conditions as listed below: 1. That the proposed development 'shall be in substantial compliance with the approved site plan, floor plans, elevations and parking plan, except as noted below. 2. • That there shall. be a minimum of 8 parking, spaces on' • the subject property. ; 3. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be -subject to further review by the City Traffic Engineer. ; 4. On appeal: - 5. That the delivery 'and/or. the pick-up•of.vehicles'for• 'sale shall be restricted -to the site,- or, where ,no alternative exists, in the alley.-, No suchdeliveries,•., shall take place*on East Coast•Highway,�'Laskspur or-, Marguerite:•'•• 6. That all employees at the -facility shall park on -site-. 7: ''That'the proposed maintenance building'sha11•be permited a zero setback on the property line adjacent'to.the,"R" ciassif:ied property and shall be'located.directly inside': and•adjacent to,the existing wrought iron fence located on the property.line adjacent to the northerly alley:• • 8. That all'conditions of approval of Use Permit-No.,3419 and Re"subdivision No. 958 shall be fulfii14d. 3'%East Coam „ighw.- - NG2 CA 926S• (714) FAX (794) 759-1990, I C 9. That all signs shall be in conformance with the provisions of Chapter 20.06 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code unless an exception permit is approved . by the City. Said signs shall be approved by, the City Traffic Engineer if located adjacent to the vehicular• ingress and egress to'the site. I0. That existing and proposed exterior lighting for the proposed project shall be designed and installed in a manner so as to conceal the light source and minimize. light and ,glare to the adjoining residential properties'' and East Coast Highway.' 11. That all mechanical'equipment and trash areas shall be screened from East Coast Highway, the alley and ad- joining properties. 12. That no outdoor loudspeaker or paging system shall be - permitted -in conjunction with the proposed facility. 13. That all vehicle maintenance and detailing shall be - confined to the interior of the maintenance building.. 14. That car washing shall be restricted to the interior of the --maintenance building only and must be provided in such a way as --to insure direct -drainage of wash water into the sewer system and not into the storm drains. 15. That -the hours of operation for automobile sales shall be limited between 10:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. daily. • _ 'Automobile detailing and maintenance shall.be limited •_ between 10:00-a-.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 1-0:00 a.m. and'5:00 p.m. 'Saturdays, 16. That•this Site Plan Review shall expire unless exercised' within 24 months from the date of approval as ,specified in Section 20.60.060 H of -the Newport Beach Municipal . Code. 17. That the applicant shall install -"no parking•" signage adjacent.to the alley. Tony ffcari ni PACIFICA•LAMBORGHINI 0 1 • • • COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ZONING CORRECTIONS Plan Check No: ralephone: _(714) 644-3200 ..,s,e.,•.,�. ••. .. ,.4,_.•., By:Genia Garcia Assistant Planner B hrist T� Assistant Planner, i t• . By:Marc Myers Assistant Planner t.�•,'.By: -�' (a-1 Date q - q 1 Address Districting Map NO. Land Use Element Page No. corrections Required: Legal Description: Lot %s-i-�J Block Section - .,Tract �Q`Y� Resubdivision required to combine lots or portions of lots when construction or alterations are in excess of $5,000. Covenant required. Please have owner's signature notarized on the attached document and return to me. Lot Size Zone �� 1 Proposed use Required Setbacks Front d Rear��_. Right Side' : Left Side Cl FAR WORKSHEET Lot area (site area sc.ft.): �•_ sq.ft. ..a// Base Development Allocation (BDA):�R �• Comm sq.ft. [0.5 x site area sq.ft., unies otherwise specified in Land Use Element] FAR permitted, without variance: b'(7AI') yll Vcomm res Pko Square footage permitted: N'i comm res nkq sq.ft. [(A) x site area sq.ft.) % Maximum FAR allowed with variance: (B) ✓I/a' comet res nkq Maximum square footage allowed: I/01 Comm res sq.ft. [(B) x site area sq.ft.] t PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: (C) Base FAR use sq.ft. sq.ft. (D) Reduced FAR use sq.ft. sq.ft. (E) Maximum FAR use sq.ft. sq.ft. (F) TOTAL SQ.FT. [C+D+E] sq.ft. PROPOSED PAR: [ F $ site area sq.ft. J PROPOSED WEIGHTED DEVELOPMENT: FAR Use Category Weighting Factor Weighted Sq.Ft. (G) (H) ( G x H ) sq.ft. Base X 1.00 sq.ft. sq.ft. Reduced X 1.67 6 sq.ft. sq.ft. Maximum X 0.50 sq.ft. TOTAL WEIGHTED SQ.FT.(May not exceed BDA) qj _ Provide tissue overlay of calculations to verify provided square footage. Required Parking Proposed parking (Indicate numb of stalls provided) per S`j�� 69Y OW, 2 Total on -Site Parking �"'' Standard Compact In -lieu Parking Dimension building height as measured from natural grade to average and maximum roof height show natural grade line on all elevations • show all rooftop NmoechaniiNaGA44ui{°mIJ�6�%ZaFtOa e�LANn from grade directly below. a EWn ShoVU t Ol�r i 0✓IS Glv�a Indicate location of. trash containers on site plan. fje(L �eemC� Number of Stories '�A4N (•�p�I �'�(J (rJ M"f' �'�'(�t _0�40- Floor Plan fully dimensioned.showing all room uses. y p�<j QGt�j• Plot Plan fully dimensioned showing location of all buildings, fences, etc. in AT relation to the property line. �!, 1 : -I_ ' ,I�� X � T Fair share Contribution of ot4AAA P PAY 7-I—g 1 �{.(y2 x l)d San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee SPECIAL APPROVAL REQUIRED THROUGH: Please indicate any discretionary excerpt approval umbersaon the plans of and incorporndingsate the attached; conditions into the blueline drawings approval letter into the blueline drawings Modifications Committee: Indicate Approval No. on Bluelines 1 Modification required for +-' ,aa.es Planning Commission/City Council: _ Use Permit: No. ai°'/' (` .Z, d ((� Variance: No • Resubdivision/Tract: No. 95R ��.y�(, (�� ReGUrd• xL Site Plan Review: No.,, Amendment: No. Other j Public Works: Easement/Encroachment Permit Subdivision Engineer Traffic Engineer Approval of Landscape Plans Building Department: Grading Engineer riwts4- Joe Parks Department: Approval of Landscape Plans Coastal Development Permits_ Approval In Concept (AIC) No. (Note: File 3 sets of plans: site, floor, and elevations) Coastal Development Permit: Noive. Date: Waiver/Exemption: No. Effective date - iron 125� i� k }a ('�vv►p1i W 1444AppaI1 ro va L re64a4-c All Co✓� i�-s o✓�s a.�d b� �� v► ec� y O Lt? Vim o DUB oo� Z 1V�I o ' Shovt) Gtill plic ,a' NOTE: It is the responsibility of the applicant to circulate their plans nd departments checked above. If you btain the necessary approvals from the have questions regarding your application, please contact me at (714) 644- 3200. I*IfORMS\COMM-ZON.COR , ,1 Conditions of Approval 3222 and 3226 East Coasty Highway SPR 64, UP 3419, R958 A. Site Plan Review No. 64 1. Substantial conformance 2. 8 parking spaces min. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. On -site parking, circulation Drive apron narrowed Alley delivery/pick-up Employees park on -site Maintenance bldg location UP 3419, R958 Conditions met 9. Signs 10. Exterior lighting 11. Equipment/Trash areas screened 12. No outdoor loudspeaker 13. Maintenance/Detailing 14. Car wash - Interior drain to sewer system 15. Hours of operation 16. No action 17. "No parking" signage DEPARTMENT ACTION Planning Plan Review Planning Plan Review Letter Code Enforcement Field Inspection Traffic Plan Review Public Works Plan Review Planning Letter Planning Letter Planning Plan Review Planning Plan Review Process Planning Sep. Plan Reviews Planning Plan Review Letter Planning Plan Review Code Enforcement Field Check Planning Plan Review Letter Planning Letter Planning Plan Review Building Planning Letter Planning Plan Review Code Enforcement Letter Field Inspection u Conditions of Approval 2632 San Miguel Drive Use Permit 1806A Page ^N B. Use Permit No. 3419 1. Substantial conformance 2. SPR 64, R958 Conditions met 3. Use permit conditions/revocation 4. No action C. Resubdivision No. 958 1. Parcel Map recorded prior to maintenance bldg occupancy 2. Improvements constructed 3. Public improvements guarantee 4. Planter drains to City stds 5. Concrete slab at alley 6. Concrete sidewalk/alley 7. Utilities underground 8. SPR,UP3419 conditions met 9. No action Planning Plan Review Planning Plan Review Process Planning Letter Planning Letter Public Works Hold on Final Parcel Map Process Public Works Plan Review Public Works Encroachment permit Public Works Plan Review Planning Plan Review Building Plan Review Public Works Plan Review CA Dept of Trans Encroachment permit Encroachment permit Building Plan Review Planning Plan Review Process