Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTRACT 6622 SETBACKS_NEWPORT DUNES11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 *NEW FILE* Tract 6622 Setbacks V� .Y. n� 8 is e� I� �r49� �z a 1 2i L o �Q zv� "� ' V ,I a. • . i\ i` $ C '. ii•�^ D K `�. F t' ii ^� ` �b 1 h%$ �' '� �'8 . �p - .�i E 01 - - 7 W V %'� �• M-2t_ I / - •-�_-S- _ J O •k F g 471 - }� K 1l1 �' B G L ��•- �f O53 t F Y t 8. ch .+K... i, �= . � - �' `. �.. F� - \�1 ''1� - Q - i �f� �` _ -!Cf S rE - � .Ft••i�j a—' - s-- � .00 tit; O �� _ r ► {T�l L � (05YO - - - \- .' ' �.`T - » ia 1 55Q _R. y . O.A. _ ., tf tab 0, ct3 6a cry cC d� a Ci IQ A50�. ��4, / xqp T 0 AV - i Qa \ . /fo r 15 2 3 3 V WfUVA- bIV V. - SU1'C� 5GYJ 5 ERMAN 0A1Le7, ►d1A Iqlm0? �BEIN RAU'B FROST . AND ASSOCIATES , CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS 138 ROCHESTER COSTA MESA. CAL FORNEA I TEL: (714) 54B - 7723 !� OPLNN B.'��04TE BGVE 0.G NV� ! � O r : g11 3 q \ ✓.{ d t� zj ,LGV� i/•i�1i��1r:_�%�f�1�!W��F � •lL.. d - i a Y,k RECEIVED , ; JUL241968, •'..::.I I i RECEIVED JUL 241968 r66� r Marreili, Marina From: Garcia, Jay Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 8:13 AM To: Marrelli, Marina Subject: FW: Port Charles Place Right -of -Way Vacation Would you please pull the setback file for Tract 6622 in the Port Streets and lets get together to see what the setback implications are from this vacation. -----Original Message ----- From., Arciniega, Patrick Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 5:45 PM To: Temple, Patty; Garcia, Jay Cc: Clauson, Robin; Badum, Steve Subject: Port Charles Place Right -of -Way Vacation Public Works is preparing to submit a summary vacation of Public Right of Way on Port Charles Place for the Oct 22 Council meeting at the request of Ken Everson of 1845 Port Charles Place. The proposed vacation consists of 6 feet of public right of way behind the public sidewalk on the southerly side of Port Charles PI. adjoining lots 26 through 35 of Tract 6622. SCE, SCG, Pac Bell, City Util Dept., Fire Dept. and Cox Comm. do not have any objections with vacating the right of way. The City Attorney's office suggested that this vacation be reviewed by Planning to see if there are any concerns/problems with this vacation which would increase the lot depth from 100' deep to 106'. Could there have been a planning requirement when this Tract was developed that required the extra right of way? If there are no issues from planning please let me know ASAP since the vacation procedure requires publishing of the public hearing notice for a minimum of two weeks prior to the hearing which would be Monday the 7th. thanks. SOT �� - �--`i 7 $ , �--�i SO ` Lor 27 —" 2-1 � Z I Lnt- 7 O Lo7" 3 0 L6-t— t,or-- LIM— 14 Lor" (16 r') X-;(% IFZCYr, /4=0