The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHOAG_ANNUAL_REVIEWII 1 II 1 *NEW FILE* 1 II 1 II HOAG ANNUAL REVIEW GUNTHER M. KILFOIL, A.I.A. PROJECT MANAGER FACILITIES DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION DIRECT (714) 846.8901 FAX (714) 646.7741 HOAG MEMORIALHOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN 301 NEWPORT BLVD. • 80X6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-6100 PHONE (714) 645.8600 Michael Cox Architect Architecture • Engineering • Interiors • Planning 1 HMC ) HMC GROUP Corporate Office 3270 Inland Empire Boulevard Ontario, CA 91764 (909) 989-9979 FAX (909) 483-1400 410 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH FILED 3300 Newport Boulevard - P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92659-1768 MAY 2 8 1992 GARYt. GRANVIILE, Ccenly Clerk NOTICE OF DETERMINATIO n�p.rti To: Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 County Clerk, County of Orange Public Services Division P.O. Box 838 Santa Ana, CA 92702 From: City of Newport Beach planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard - P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92659-1768 (Orange County) Date received for filing at OPR: Subject: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Name of Project: Hoag Hospital blaster Plan, Ordinance No. 92-3, Ordinance No. 92-4 State Clearinghouse Number. Lead Agency Contact Person: Telephone No.: 89061429 Patricia Temple 714 / 644-3225 Project Location: 301 Newport Boulevard, 4000 West Coast Highway, Newport Beach, CA • Project Description: Adoption of a Development Agreement and Planned Community District Regulations and Development Plan For Hoag Hospital This is to advise that the Ciry and has made the following Newport Beach has approved the above described project on 5-26-92 of determinations regarding the above described project: (Date) ❑ will not have a significant effect on the environment. Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 1. The project i7 will 2. I7 An Environmental ❑ A Negative Declaration 3. Mitigation measures 4. A Statement of Overriding 11 were ❑ were not made a condition of the approval of the project. Considerations x was ❑ was not adopted for this project. were not made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 5. Findings l7 were ❑ The final EIR or Negative Declaration and record of project approval is available for review at the Planning Depart- ment of the City of Newport Beach, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA 92659-1768; 714/644-3225 ,L R74'! May 28, 1992 Joh . Douglas, MCP, Environmental Coordinator Date CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT May 28, 1992 TO: County Clerk Public Services Division FROM: Environmental Coordinator City of Newport Beach SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DETERMINATION FILING Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Determination for filing as required by Public Resources Code Section 21152. Compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21089(b) and Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 is provided as follows: [1 [1 [l Enclosed is a check in the amount of $875 ($850 as required for an EIR project + $25 County Clerk filing fee). Enclosed is a check in the amount of $1275 ($1250 as required for a Negative Declaration project + $25 County Clerk filing fee). Enclosed are two copies of a Certificate of Fee Exemption as provided by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 and CCR Title 14, Section 7535, and a check in the \ / amount of $25 (County Clerk filing fee). (xj The approval associated with the enclosed NOD is one of a series of actions that are jjj vvv part of the same project. The required DFG fee was paid at the time the Notice of Determination was filed for the first such action on this project (see 'attached receipt). As provided by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(g), no additional DFG fee is therefore required. Enclosed is the $25 County Clerk filing fee. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at 644-3225. H. Douglas CP onmental oordinator F:\WPS1\PLANNING\JOHN-D\FORMS\NOD-CO V RMEM a o, rw DEPARTMENT OFD GAME DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMEf1'I�I�ILING FEE CASH RECEIPT 0 ,7 DFG 753 5a (641) 5 / 19 / 92 r Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach Date: . Document No.: 71392 • ,. County/State Agency of Filing: Orange Magliar P1an.FTR Nn . 142 , Traffic Study No.81.Var.No.1180 Phone Number: or7.s$y?4+ CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: $ 850.00 0) Environmental Impact Report $$$50.00 $ Negative Declaration Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only) $850.00 $ Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs $5500 $ 25.00 CountyAdministrative Fee Project that is exempt from fees Project Title: pang Hnsp Project Applicant Name:1''ty of now pnrt RP, ell Project Applicant Address: Project Applicant (check appropriate box): Local Public Agency X❑ School District ❑ Other Special District State Agency ❑ Private Entity ❑ TOTAL RECEIVED $ 875.00 Signature and title of person receiving payment: 1/477747 f mIRDCOPY-LEAD AGENCY FOURTH COPYCWMY/5rAtE AGEtCYOF RUNG FlRSrCOPY•PfiO.IECIAPPLICANr SECOND COPY•DFG/FASe _ ........_.....•..... .... :.. :...: .:....._ _._.......a........ .:.: :...... :...:.:: ihli?iiil: ...t..R.n. ...t...s.4h.! r:'. r... . • Authdrized to Publ'sh Advertisements of a , 't 'Decree of theSuperior court of Orange Co,.. September 29:1961, andA-24831 June 11, 1963 ding public notices by mia, NumberA-6214, 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the NEWPORT BEACH —COSTA MESA PILOT, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, State of California, and that attached Notice is a true and complete copy as was printed and published on the following dates: November 9, 1991 I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on at Costa Me November 9; alif rni Signature ,199 1 PUBrrC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING Notice Is hereby given that the Planning Commis- sion Beach l will hthe told fa Npublic hearing on the application of Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian for Amend- ment No. 744 and Traffic Study No. 81 on property located at 301 Newport Boulevard and 4000 West Coast Highway. Request to establish Planned, Community Dis- trict Regulations and adopt a Planned Community De- velopment Plan for Hoag Hospital, The proposal would establish regulations and development stand- ards for the long term build -out of acute and non - acute health care facllitles. The proposal alsb Includes an amendment to District Mg Maps No. 22'and 22-A so as to redistrict the hos- pital -property from the A•P- H and U(Unclasifldd) Dis- tracts to the P•C (Planned Community) Dlstkict; an amendment to Chapter 20.02 of thb Newportl Beach Municipal Code soy' as to amend the Height Limitation Zones Map and the legal description of the 26/ 35 Foot Height Limita- tion District to place the Lower Campus wholly within the 32/50 Foot Height Limitation District:' and the approval of the Traffic Study for Phase I of. the master plan program. NOTICE IS HEREBY FUR• THER GIVEN that an Envi- ronmental Impact Report, has been prepared in con- nection with the application', noted above. It is the present intention of the Cltyl. to accept the Envll• ronmental Impact Report and_supponinq document PROOF OF PUBLICATION The Cii e'neburages mem; boys ofthegeneral public to review and comment on this documentation. Copies of the Environmental Im- pact Report and supporting documents are available for public review and In- spection at the Planning Department, City of New- port Beach, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California, 92659.1766 (714) 644-3225. Notice Is hereby further given that said public hear- ing will be held on the 21st day of November, 1991, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. In the Council Chambers of the Newport Beach Clty Hall, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, Califgrnla, at which time and place any and all persons Inter- ested may appear and be heard thereon. If you chal- lenge this project In court you may be limited to rais- ing only those Issues you r someone else raised al the public hearing de- scribed In this notice or In written correspondence de- livered to the City at, or FfraionIle(14arInomta l7) 544.3200. Norma Glover, Sacra. tary, Planning Commis• sion, Clty of Nowport Bosch. NOTE: The expepse of this notice Is paid from a filing fee collected from the applicant, Published Newport Beach/Costa Mesa Pilot November 9, 1991. SA905 c City of Newport Beach City Council Minutes June 28, 1999 '4'4, Council Member Ridgeway requested that the General Services Department and the SPON Tree Committee work together on the issue. Mayor O'Neil stated that it has not been determined if the equipment is a'�u,, lty or if there was operator error. Council Member Glover confirmed with City Attorney Burnham that no actio\can be taken by the City Council during Public Comments. Ir ne Bl ck, 1646 Irvine Avenue, stated that she spoke with an arborist in Tennessee egarding the resistograph F-line machine. She said that he indicated that he has had a lot of experience with resistographs giving false readings. Sh&added that there are three types of resistographs and she'd like the matter Ipoked into further. Bob Caustin, 471 014 Newport Blvd, Defend the Bay, referred to the Water Quality/Back Bay Ovb view at the earlier Study Session and complimented staff for their very comilitehensive review of the issues affecting the bay. He thought that the level ofkiunderstanding was commendable. Mr. Caustin stated that Defend the BaNs now prepared to ask the neighbors upstream to do a better job of polic5ng what enters the bay and share in the responsibility. Mary Porter, 700 Larkspur Avene, stated that she is against having the trees removed in Corona del Mar. She stated that three of the trees are on her property and provide memories"$�or her, have historical value and enhance her property. She stated thafthe trees do not look like they are dead or dying. She stated that the trees4provide shade and are used by wildlife. She concluded by stating that she was not notified of the tree removals. Bettye Butterworth, 721 Jasmine Avenue, provided the City Council with photos and a copy of her statement. She said that a ee on her property was removed over a year ago and the removal caused d mage to her property, which she was later reimbursed for. She stated that h r main complaint is with the lack of notification that is given. She added t It Patrick Bartolic has also provided a statement and agrees with her that t 'ie\removal of the trees has a negative effect on the area. Kurt English, P. O. Box 2817, residing at Seashore & 39th, spot?about the 4th of July restriction problem. He stated that the barricades that ce placed in the area make it difficult for the residents who want to leave the`area to enjoy legal fireworks, because they have a problem trying to exit and :turn from their property. He requested that the City Council balance he interests of property rights and civil order by instructing the Police to be flexible as possible with the residents. PUBLIC HEARINWS 24. STATUS REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 4 (THE IRVINE COMPANY, LIBRARY EXCHANGE AGREEMENT), NO. 5 (HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN), NO. 6 (THE IRVINE COMPANY, CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT AND OPEN INDEX Development Agreements No 4: C-2823-A No 5: C-2912 Volume 52 - Page 566 to qG { nu4 /2to-; eu) NMr►z,ufei &(z7 R 2 Pe fo l- 6 o gCo, 9aj Il /LJirr a 712i Sup iernn-nP Sm a airt), 6f2glgl S City of Newport Beach City Council Minutes June 28, 1999 INDEX SPACE AGREEMENT (CIOSA)), NO. 7 PACIFIC VIEW MEMORIAL PARK), NO. 8 (FORD MOTOR LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION), NO. 9 (FLETCHER JONES MOTOR CARS), NO. 10 (NEWPORT HARBOR LUTHERAN CHURCH), AND NO. 11 (THE IRVINE COMPANY AND IRVINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY CONCERNING BONITA CANYON) — TO CONDUCT AN ANNUAL REVIEW OF CURRENT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS TO REVIEW THE APPLICANTS' GOOD FAITH AND SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE WITH EACH AGREEMENT IN ADDITION TO THOSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REQUIRED OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH. Mayor O'Neil opened the public hearing. Motion by Mayor O'Neil to continue the public hearing to a City Council Study Session on Monday, July 12, 1999, at 4:00 p.m. Without objection, the motion carried by acclamation. uu.uuilt.uwuwwm.iw.uur,;.w.. .1“....Kl.0 25. TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE — PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 15.40 OF THE NBMC, TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE, 0 PROVIDE THAT CIRCULATION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS R3 UIRED FOR A DEVELOPMENT ARE ROUGHLY PRO ORTIONAL TO THAT PROJECT'S IMPACT, TO MODIFY THE DEFI ION OF FEASIBLE IMPROVEMENT, TO ESTABLISH A THRES LD FOR TRAFFIC IMPACTS THAT REQUIRE CIRCULA IQN SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS AND TO CHANGE THE NUMBER OF FFIRMATIVE VOTES NEEDED TO OVERRIDE THE PROVISIONS • THE ORDINANCE TO 5/7THS OF THE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VO (contd. from 6/14/99). Mayor O'Neil stated th• this item was reviewed at the previous City Council meeting, that pub • testimony was taken and that the Planning Commission also reviewed it a several public hearings. Mayor O'Neil asked that those in the audience that ished to comment on the item limit their comments to information that was ngt already a part of the public record. City Attorney Burnham discussed the angel that had taken place in the document since the previous City Coun meeting. He stated that eight changes were made to the draft Traffic Phas Ordinance (TPO). He began by stating that language was added to the fin ' gs section. Council Member Glover asked the City Manager abo t her request to have a report prepared about how to put together a congests management plan. City Manager Bludau did not recall the request, and cormed that it was not a part of the packet. City Attorney/Burnham continued by stating that the language ddded to the findings section should help the City defend the ordinance if it is cll enged. He stated that a new section has also been added that deals with st ards for approval that make it clear that improvements or contributions be de as a condition of the project. He stated that staff is also proposing to go ba to the 1% test for determining the significance of a project at any given Volume 52 - Page 566 No 6: C-2920 No 7: C-3058 No 8: C-3059 No 9: C-3067 No 10: C-3152 No 11: C-3174 (38) Ord 99-17 Traffic Phasing Ordinance (26) l CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT moo NEWPORT BOULEVARD NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 (94) 644-3200; FAX (714) 644-3250 Hearing Date: June 28, 1999 Agenda Item No.: Staff Person: Eugenia Garcia 644-3208 REPORT TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Status Report on Development Agreements Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10, and 11 PURPOSE: To conduct an annual review of current Development Agreements to review the applicants' good faith and substantial compliance with each agreement in addition to those terms and conditions required of the City of Newport Beach. REQUIRED ACTION: gf Hold hearing; if desired, determine compliance, modify or terminate: Development Agreement No. 4 The Irvine Company, Library Exchange Agreement Development Agreement No. 5 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Development Agreement No. 6 The Irvine Company, Circulation Improvement and Open Space Agreement Development Agreement No. 7 Pacific View Memorial Park Development Agreement No. 8 Ford Motor Land Development Corporation Development Agreement No. 9 Fletcher Jones Motor Cars Development Agreement No. 10 Newport Harbor Lutheran Church Development Agreement No. 11 The Irvine Company and Irvine Community Development Company Concerning Bonita Canyon Background This report contains the annual performance review of development agreements approved by the City of Newport Beach. Development Agreements 1, 2, and 3 are not included in this review for the reasons described below. Development Agreement No. 1 between the City of Newport Beach and Park Lido, Ltd. was approved by the City Council (Ordinance No. 83-7) on January 24, 1983. This agreement required that Park Lido, Ltd. advance 50% of the cost of the installation of' a traffic signal at the intersection of Hospital Road and Placentia Avenue in exchange for the approval of the development of a 65,269 square foot two-story medical office building located at 351 Hospital Road. The specific project approved was never pursued and all approvals sunsetted after 24 months. Subsequently, a second project was approved and constructed without a development agreement. The traffic signal which was addressed in the original agreement has been installed. Development Agreement No. 2 between the City of Newport Beach and the Irvine Company was approved by the City Council on April 22, 1985. This agreement was to allow the construction of 888 residential dwelling units and 50,000 square feet of commercial development in the North Ford Planned Community, and 295,000 square feet of office development in the Koll Center Newport Planned Community. This project has been completed and the terms and conditions of Development Agreement No. 2 have been satisfied. Development Agreement No. 3 between the City of Newport Beach and the J. M. Peters Co. was approved by the City Council (Ordinance No. 85-24) on September 23, 1985. This agreement established specific development rights and related obligations pursuant to the annexation of the Bayview site to the City of Newport Beach. This project has been completed and the terms and conditions of Development Agreement No. 3 have been satisfied. Discussion The City of Newport Beach has entered into eight additional development agreements in conjunction with the approval of several development projects within the City in order to achieve maximum utilization of resources to the owners, while minimizing the economic cost to the public. The development agreements represent certain assurances to the owners that they may proceed with development of certain properties in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval. In approving these development agreements, the City provided the opportunities for strengthening the public planning process, encouraging private participation in comprehensive planning, and reducing the economic costs of development. The approval process has provided the City with the opportunity to gain from the applicants certain public benefit improvements such as streets, sewer facility improvements, public facilities, drinking water, utility facilities and open space. Individual development agreements specify the duration of the agreement, the duration for the completion of total build -out, circulation improvements, or dedication of open space. In some cases, terms of the agreements span a 20-25 year time frame. The development agreements specify permitted uses of the properties, density, intensity of use, maximum height and size of proposed buildings and provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes, which may also be included in the respective Planned Community Texts (PC's) for each development. The development agreements, in some cases, provide that construction be commenced and completed within a specified time period or accomplished in phases. Pursuant to the requirements of Section 15.45.070 of the Municipal Code, Article 2.5, Section 65865.1 of the California Government Code, and stated conditions of each development agreement, the attached status reports have been prepared for each development agreement between the City and the above stated applicants. The purpose of this review is to establish the status of each development agreement and to assess compliance with the terms and conditions that have not been accomplished since the last annual review. Those terms and conditions that were noted as completed on the last annual review are not included in this report. The Development Agreements included in this annual review and their dates of adoption are listed below: Development Applicant Date of Adoption Agreement No. 4 The Irvine Company, Library Exchange 5 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian 6 The Irvine Company, Circulation Improvement and Open Space Agreement 7 Pacific View Memorial Park 8 Ford Motor Land Development Land Corporation 9 Fletcher Jones Motor Cars 10 Newport Harbor Lutheran Church 11 The Irvine Company and Irvine Community Development Company Concerning Bonita Canyon Conclusion 1/13/92, ORD 91-46 Revised 4/27/92 5/26/92, ORD 92-3 Amended 2/14/94 9/14/92, ORD 92-35, Amended 9/11/95, ORD 95-42 7/10/95, ORD 95-26 7/24/95, ORD 95-27 Amended 7/22/96 9/11/95, ORD 95-43 6/23/97; ORD 97-22 11/10/97,ORD 97-77 The decision before the City Council is whether to determine compliance with the terms of Development Agreements 4,5,6,8,9,10, and 11, to modify any of the Agreements, or, if there is not substantial compliance with the terms of an Agreement, to terminate the Development Agreement. For Development Agreement No 7, direct staff to continue efforts to achieve compliance with the terms of the Development Agreement: tG Submitted by: PATRICIA L. TEMPLE Planning Director Prepared by: EUGENIA GARCIA Associate Planner HOAG HOSPITAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT,NO. 5 Project Status Report Fourth Annual Review of the Development Agreement by and between The City of Newport Beach and Hoag Memorial Hospital I. Introduction On May 11, 1992, the City of Newport Beach certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 142 for the Hoag Hospital Master Plan and adopted a Planned Community Development Plan and District Regulations for Hoag Hospital. On May 26, 1992, the City of Newport Beach approved Development Agreement No. 5 between the City and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian. It was recorded in the Recorder's office in the County of Orange on August 4, 1993. On February 14, 1994, the Development Agreement was amended by the City Council to incorporate revisions requested by the staff of the California Coastal Commission and the revised Development Agreement was recorded on March 23, 1994. The California Coastal Commission approved the revised Development Agreement on April 14, 1994, and amended the Coastal Development Permit on July 21, 1995. H. Purpose The purpose of Development Agreement No. 5 is to enable Hoag Hospital to develop the hospital property consistent with a Master Plan and Planned Community Development Plan and within the approvals set forth by the Coastal Development Permit issued by the California Coastal Commission. The future development of the Hoag Hospital property will allow the hospital to offer additional and needed services for the community by responding to the ever -changing health and medical care technologies and delivery systems. The Development Agreement spells out strict, binding limits on the amount and height of permitted development and insures compliance with conditions related to density, location, and timing of construction to minimize, to the extent feasible, any environmental impacts of the proposed expansion. The Development Agreement includes requirements for dedication of property, construction of public improvements and/or the installation of landscaping visible to the public, which,fphen considered in conjunction with the public services provided by Hoag, benefit the general public. Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 15.45 of the Municipal Code and Section 5 of the Development Agreement, Hoag Memorial Hospital or its successor(s) in interest is to submit an annual report for review by the City Council demonstrating good faith substantial compliance with the terms of the Agreement. Documentation submitted by Hoag Hospital substantiating good faith compliance with the Development Agreement was submitted to the City on June 25, 1995, for the first annual review and on May 8, 1996 (as amended on October 2, 1996, at the City's request) for the second annual review. City staff subsequently requested that the reporting period for the Development Agreement annual review be changed from April 15 ending date to a July 1 ending date to correspond with City Council's review of all Development Agreements with the City of Newport Beach. The attached project status report is for the third annual review, July 1, 1996 to July 1, 1997. The third annual review was heard and approved at the City Council Meeting of January 26, 1998. This review was for the period of July 1, 1997 to December 31, 1997. At that time, the City Council found Hoag Hospital and the City to be in full compliance with the Development Agreement and Mitigation Measures. This is the fourth annual review of Development Agreement No. 5 and is for the period of January 1, 1998 through December 31, 1998. Hoag Hospital submitted a detailed status report which divides the annual review between compliance with the requirements of the Development Agreement (public benefits, exactions), and compliance with the requirements of the Mitigation Measures. Since the original approval of the Development Agreement, the following table represents the projects that have been implemented per the Agreement: Cardiac Services Addition and Emergency Care Unit Parking Lot/Entry Reconfiguration (Upper Campus) Completed during the 1995-1996 annual review period The Lower Campus Parking Lot — A 346- space ancillary parking lot Permits issued on Sept. 17, 1996 and project completed June 11, 1997. Flare Relocation/Scrubber Installation project Permits issued January 16, 1998 and completed construction and relocation on July 23, 1998. Addition to the Central Plant and emergency generators Commenced construction on January 2, 1998 and completed. Tower Renovation Project Plans approved by OSHPD, December, 1998 Support SeSif es Building and 368-space Parking Structure Permits approved on April 16, 1998. And the project is currently under construction. The annual review includes a review of the following: , Development Agreement obligations and Environmental Document Mitigation Measures. the For this review period, the conditions and mitigation measures that are required per Development Agreement are listed below with an explanation as to how the requirements were or are being met. All numbering is consistent with number sections of the Development Agreement. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO.5 3.2. Com Hance with Master Plan Conditions/Miti ation Measures: This iti Measure Measure o. r on an ui s, send that tter This Mitigation Measure requires that City staff, ag Hospital, requesting is, ga letter 2 to each emergency vehicle company serving is in orderh to turn off their sirens upon entering the hospital property. This request provided the City anies, and letters have been sent by staff minimize the noise impacts to adjacent residents. Hoag has with a list of emergency vehicle comp Appendix. to the listed companies. See Table 2 in the 8.2 Exactions: Hoag shall, as a condition to the right to develop, do the following: (a) Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate and Grade the Proposed Linear and Consolidated View Park. Completed. Public Improvement Funds ($250,000.00). Hoag Hospital sp n is to pay the amount to the City to fund the following imp (i) The construction of a sidewalk and installation fla.e i g in the CalTrans right-of-way along paidf Hospital Road. This amount was Newportto the Cityvd southerly The improvements have been competed in the by Hoag. construction. conjunction with the Arches Interchange (ii) and, if funds remain, the construction f cilithe ti opertessary to bring reclaimed water to Wes d to pore City by Hoag Hospital This amount has been pperiod. The total amount of during the second annual review o has been spent on the money that was paid by construction of sidewalks in conjunction with the Arches Interchange project. There will not be any remaining funds available for a reclaimed water project due to the costs of improvements associated with the Arches Interchange construction. (c) Study of possible future improvement in and around the easterly end of Semeniuk Slough. Completed. (b) Notices and staff's report sent to: Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian 301 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 Attention: President City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Post Office Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92663-3884 Attention: Homer Bludau, City Manager City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Post Office Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92663-3884 Attention: Robert Burnham, City Attorney City Clerk City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Post Office Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92663-3884 ff City of Newport Beach City Council Minutes July 12, 1999 Mayor O'Neil concluded the conversation by stating that he is on the CVB wrs�d as ex-officio, so more closely associated with the CVB than some of the other"Lo cil members. He stated that the enthusiasm from the group at their recen nual dinner was marvelous, and that the participation and membership is endous. He felt that the City Council appreciated the work of the CVB an t communication between the City and the CVB should maybe be increase " e suggested that representatives from the CVB meet with the City Manag 1 4o discuss the mission statement and maybe increase some of the goals, a ecussed earlier. Mayor O'Neil thanked Ms. Williams for the presentation • wished Mr. McDaniel the best of luck, and hoped that they received the revie p.sitively. Council Member Noyes stated that he would like to see paperwork issues corrected, and that most of his comments were City staff. me of the ed at INDEX 3. STATUS REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS: TO CONDUCT AN ANNUAL REVIEW OF CURRENT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS TO REVIEW THE APPLICANTS' GOOD FAITH AND SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE WITH EACH AGREEMENT IN ADDITION TO THOSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REQUIRED OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH. A) NO. 4 (THE IRVINE COMPANY, LIBRARY EXCHANGE AGREEMENT); B) NO. 5 (HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN); C) NO. 6 (THE IRVINE COMPANY, CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT AND OPEN SPACE AGREEMENT [CIOSA]); D) NO. 7 PACIFIC VIEW MEMORIAL PARK); E) NO. 8 (FORD MOTOR LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION); F) NO. 9 (FLETCHER JONES MOTOR CARS); G) NO. 10 (NEWPORT HARBOR LUTHERAN CHURCH); AND H) NO. 11 (THE IRVINE COMPANY AND IRVINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY CONCERNING BONITA CANYON). City Manager Bludau stated that an annual review of all development agreements is required by the City's Municipal Code. Mayor O'Neil confirmed with Assistant City Manager Wood that compliance with all terms and conditions of the development agreements has been met. He added that the development agreements have different terms and conditions, and he understands that staff has met with the parties involved. Council Member Glover referred to the CIOSA Open Space Dedications chart in the staff report for Development Agreement No. 6 and asked about the dedication o(r/the trail and bluff area on the Upper Castaways property. Associate Planner Garcia responded that maintenance is taking place on the upper bluff trail and that when it is completed, the site will be dedicated. Council Member Glover confirmed with Associate Planner Garcia that compliance meant that although there may be outstanding issues, that the Development Agreements No 4: C-2823-A No 5: • C-2912 No 6: C-2920 No 7: C-3058 No 8: C-3059 No 9: C-3067 No 10: C-3152 No 11: C-3174 (38) Volume 52 - Page 596 City of Newport Beach City Council Minutes July 12, 1999 INDEX terms of the agreement are being met. Council Member Glover stated that the plantings on the bluff side of the fence are not compliant with what the City required. She stated that plants are being planted that are maybe pretty but are not appropriate to limit erosion of the Cliff. She requested that the City talk with Taylor -Woodrow. Council Member Glover added that the fence that has been installed by Taylor -Woodrow is made of cheap wood and should not be accepted by the City. Also, the plants on the trail were removed and the residents have planted new ones. Council Member Glover again wanted that issue looked into. Council Member Noyes commented about the topping of the trees on Lower Castaways, and was curious who did it. No answer was received. In reference to Development Agreement No. 9, City Manager Bludau stated his disappointment that the repayments from Fletcher Jones had not been received, and that staff is looking at ways to make sure development agreements are agreed upon by all departments. Mayor O'Neil suggested that Development Agreement Nos. 6 & 9 should be continued for further review of the issues that have been raised. Assistant City Manager Wood confirmed for Council Member Ridgeway that the repayment owed by Fletcher Jones is for the improvement to Bayview Way, and that the City did not send the invoice last year. She added that she does not feel that Fletcher Jones has been out of compliance, but that the City failed to make the billing. Assistant City Manager Wood commented on the dedication of the trail on the Upper Castaways property. She stated that the offer to dedicate was made but that the City will not accept the dedication until the property is in the right condition for the City to accept it for long-term maintenance. Associate Planner Garcia confirmed this and added that many of the improvements are related to the finalizing of the tract map. She said that the Public Works Department is aware of the issues. Council Member Glover stated her concern that people think it is the City that.has made, or approved, the changes to the site, which is not the case. She said that she is receiving many complaints. Carol Hoffman, The Irvine Company, confirmed that The Irvine Company did make the offer of dedication for the Upper Castaways site, in compliance with the development agreement. She stated that the acceptance has not come as quickly as expected, but that the Public Works Department wants to resolve all issues before accepting it. fCouncil Member Glover stated. that Taylor -Woodrow must replace the fence. Ms. Hoffman referred to the CIOSA Open Space Dedications chart in the staff report, and stated that the Freeway Reservation parcel was included in the park site that was acquired through Mello -Roos and the joint powers • Volume 52 - Page 597 City of Newport Beach City Council Minutes July 12, 1999 INDEX authority. She stated that the site was purchased on March 18, 1999 and is now owned by the City. She also stated that the deferred maintenance on the Newport Village parcel has been completed. Motion by Mayor O'Neil to determine compliance on all Development Agreements, except for No. 6 - pending further review of the issues raised. Without objection, the motion carried by acclamation. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None. ADJOURNMENT — 5:28 p.m. • The agenda for the Study Session was posted on July 7, 1999, at 2:40 p.m. on the City Hall Bulletin Board located outside of the City of Newport Beach Administration Building. City Clerk gf Recording Setary Mayor 12: 67").44, Volume 62 - Page 598 • CITY 'OF NEV ORT BEACH COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT 3300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 (714) 644-3200; FAX (714) 644-3250 Hearing Date: Agenda Item No.: Staff Person: June 28, 1999 SS#3 Eugenia Garcia 644-3208 Supplemental Information SUBJECT: PURPOSE: REPORT TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Status Report on Development Agreements Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 To conduct an annual review of current Development Agreements to review the applicants' good faith and substantial compliance with each agreement in addition to those terms and conditions required of the City of Newport Beach. REQUIRED ACTION: Hold hearing; determine compliance, modify or terminate: Development Agreements Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10 and 11. This report contains supplemental information received by the City regarding the annual performance review for compliance with the above referenced development agreements. The following table is a summary of the compliance status for each development agreement. • Development Agreement No. Applicant 4 The Irvine Company, Library Exchange 5 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian 6 The Irvine Company, Circulation Improvement and Open Space Agreement 7 Pacific View Memorial Park 8 Ford Motor Land Development Land Corporation 9 Fletcher Jones Motor Cars 10 •lewport Harbor Lutheran Church 11 The Irvine Company and Irvine Community Development Company Concerning Bonita Canyon Summary of Compliance Status In Compliance In Compliance In Compliance In Compliance In Compliance In Compliance In Compliance In Compliance 7 Development Agreement No.6 Staff has received additional information regarding the CIOSA Open Space Dedications and has included the changes in bold on the attached chart, which replaces handwritten page #38 in the report for June 28. Development Agreement No. 7 As indicated in staff's previous report (handwritten page #65), Pacific View Memorial Park was not in compliance with the landscaping requirement for Area 8 and the northeasterly boundary of Building Site D. On June 28, staff met with the General Manager of Pacific View to address this issue. New landscaping in these two areas has been installed recently, and upon recommendations by staff, additional landscaping was to be installed to comply with the requirements of the development agreement. On July 2, staff visited the site to review the 'landscaping, and is now of the opinion that the two areas in question are in compliance with the requirements of the Development Agreement. Development Agreement No. 8 Since the initial reporting of compliance, staff has received concerns from a member of the Eastbluff community that there is compliance issues with Section 5.5, Eastbluff Traffic (handwritten page #72). The Eastbluff community in the vicinity of the Ford property has had a historical concern regarding the impact of through traffic on its streets. The ER had concluded that the development of the Ford property (Pacific Bay Tract) would not contribute sufficient through traffic to constitute a significant impact on this existing problem. Further, Ford had no legal obligation to correct the existing problems and the City had no authority independent of the Development Agreement to impose a condition requiring Ford to correct the existing problem. Pursuant to the Development Agreement, Ford was to contribute to the solution of the existing traffic problem as follows: a. The determination of a solution shall be dependent upon an agreement between the Eastbluff community and the City. b. If the "solution" costs $50,000 or less: i. Ford will pay one -hundred percent of total cost of the capital improvements/traffic studies (as opposed to long-term maintenance) of the solution as actually implemented; or If the "solution' costs more than $50,000: i. Ford will pay one-third of the total cost of the capital improvements/traffic studies as actually implemented with a minimum payment of $50,000 and a maximum payment of $75,000. c. Ford will not be required to make a deposit of funds until a "solution" actually is approved by the City for implementation. Any funds actually deposited but not used to implement the solution shall be returned to Ford. d. If the City and Date (7/22/96),tand the date for agreement has he Eastbluff community have onot been extended by Ford, this obligation shall terminate. t agreed on a "solution" within one year from the e Pacific Bay Homes (Ford) has made payments to the City for traffic studies and improvements and directly to the Eastbluff Community Association for studies related to the existing problems. The community did not vote to gate the project. The date for agreement on a traffic solution has been extended twice, upon Eastbluff s request the first time and by Pacific Bay Homes the second time, and expired on December 31, 1997. Improvements to traffic Rtterns at Jamboree Road and Bison were implemented on a trial basis in January 1998, in order to reduce cut - through traffic in this area. The City Council is scheduled to consider making these improvements permanent at their meeting of July 26, 1999. Pacific Bay Homes has made an additional commitment (see attached letter) to fund expenses to mitigate traffic in Eastbluff, extended to December 31, 1999. Staff believes this commitment is an extra effort by Pacific Bay Homes to contribute to the resolution of traffic problems in Eastbluff and is consistent with the intent of the Development Agreement. Development Agreement No. 9 Councilmember Adams requested that the review of this development agreement also include a status report on lighting issues at the dealership. The mitigation measures and conditions of approval related to lighting are attached, as is the action plan to reduce lighting that was approved by the City Council in February 1998. After a 30-day review period to determine the effectiveness of the lighting improvements, the City Council found the dealership in compliance with all lighting related mitigation measures and conditions of approval on April 13, 1998. The Council also directed staff to budget for landscaping that would screen the lighting from the view of nearby residents. That project was not completed in fiscal year 1998-99, and the Council re -budgeted the project for 1999-2000. Fletcher Jones has agreed to match City funds on the project, up to a maximum of $30,000, which brings the total project budget to $65,000. Councilmember Adams and staff have been working with Fletcher Jones and the neighbors on a planting plan that can be accepted by all parties, and believe we have achieved that. Staff is also working with the California Department of Fish and Game and Coastal Commission on permit approvals, and have learned of some biological issues with the landscaping plan, which will require additional research and possible alternatives to the plan. Item #3 on handwritten page #76 of the June 28`h report refers to the funding of the Bayview Drive extension and payments made to the City by Fletcher Jones Motorcars. Further research by staff indicates that the actual costs of the construction of the street were approximately $453,815.13. Fletcher Jones Motorcars made a contribution of $139,875.45 and an agreement was made with the City to make five (5) annual payments for the remainder of the actual construction costs. One payment of $62,787.97 was made on August 1, 1997, and staff cannot verify further invoices. The remaining balance owed to the City is $251,151.71. Staff will send an invoice for the 1998 and 1999 payments in August, 1999. Conclusion The decision before the City Council is whether to determine compliance with the terms of Development Agreements 4,5,6,7, 8,9,10, and 11, if there is not substantial compliance with the terms of an Agreement, to terminate the Development Agreement, or, to modify any of the Agreements. Submitted by: SHARON Z. WOOD Assistant City Manager Prepared by: EUGENIA GARCIA Associate PlannAer�>��, V Attachments: CIO pen Space Dedications chart • Let from Pacific Bay Properties Fletcher Jones Lights Action Plan Excerpt from Planning Commission minutes dated August 24, 1995, for Fletcher Jones ¢f i City of Newport Beach City Council Minutes January 26, 1998 INDEX wards opened the public hearing, and hearing no testimony, continued the Without ob'ection, the motion carried b acclamationn� w ,zw .- 26. STATUS REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS NOS. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10. Conduct annual review of current Development Agreements to review the applicants' good faith and substantial compliance with each agreement in addition to those terms and conditions required of the City. . Development Agreement No. 4 (C-2912) The Irvine Company, Library Exchange Agreement Development Agreement No. 5 (C-3058) Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Development Agreement No. 6 (C-3059) The Irvine Company, Circulation Improvement and Open Space Agreement (CIOSA) Development Agreement No. 7 (C-3065) Pacific View Memorial Park Development Agreement No. 8 (C-3152) Ford Motor Land Development Corporation Development Agreement No. 9 (C-2823A) Fletcher Jones Motor Cars Development Agreement No. 10 (C-2920) Newport Harbor Lutheran Church City Manager Murphy stated that each development agreement requires an annual status report and review. He stated that staff was available to answer any questions about the information provided in the staff report. Council Member Glover asked for a clarification regarding Development Agreement #6, The Irvine Company Circulation Improvement and Open Space Agreement. She noted that on Page 4 of the Project Status Report, it states that the site on the southeast corner of San Miguel Road and Avocado Avenue was redesignated as'multi-family residential according to General Plan Amendment No. 97-3. She then noted that on Page 5 of the report, the same site is listed as being open space. Assistant City Manager Wood said that the amendment has only been initiated. Planning Director Temple explained th l the general plan was never actually amended to change the underlying land use designation. She stated that the actual land use designation, as mapped on the existing land use element, is administrative, professional and financial commercial, however, through the development agreement, The Irvine Company agreed to dedicate the site as open space. Planning Director Temple said that if the multi -family residential project is Development Agreements C-2912 C-3058 C-3059 C-3065 C-3152 C-2823A C-2920 (38/68) Volume 51- Page 596 _ .4 — slag erb4-- City of Newport Beach City Council Minutes January 26,1998 INDEX not approved, then staff would request a subsequent amendment to designate the property as open space in the general plan. Council Member Debay inquired about Development Agreements #4, 6 and 9, and the fact that they appear to be incomplete. Assistant City Manager Wood stated, that in the past, Development Agreement #5, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, has been the only applicant to provide a detailed progress annual report. She stated, further, that staff has determined that the other applicants have been in compliance with the substantive requirements of the agreements. Motion by Council Member Hedges to continue the item for one month, with the exception of Development Agreement #5. Mayor Edwards opened the public hearing. Reverend Bill Kirlin-Hackett, Newport Harbor Lutheran Church, stated that they submitted a report of compliance on their portion of the development agreement (#10) and doesn't feel they should be continued. He feels that they've complied. Council Member Debay clarified that the only development agreements that she noticed were in non-compliance were Development Agreements #4, 6 and 9. Council Member O'Neil feels that if staff feels there is substantial compliance, he doesn't feel that the development agreements need to come back to the City Council this year, but that he'd like to see more comprehensive compliance in the future. Council Member O'Neil stated that he would not be supporting motion. Don Stahlin, Pacific Bay Homes, understood that Development Agreement #8, Ford Motor Land Development Corporation, was in full compliance. He apologized for anything that is found to be substandard, but they would be happy to bring their development agreement to full compliance. Assistant City Manager Wood clarified that reports have been received from Pacific View Memorial Park, Development Agreement #7, and Ford Motor Land Development Corporation, Development Agreement #8. In regards to Fletcher Jones Motor Cars, Development Agreement #9, and Newport Harbor Lutheran Church, Development Agreement #10, she stated that it is the responsibility of the City to provide the information. Carol Hoffman, The Irvine Company, understood from staff that all the information needed for Development Agreements #4 and 6 had been received. She stated that if additional information was needed, she would be happy to provide it. They would like their information to be complete. Hearing no4Frtarther testimony, Mayor Edwards closed the public hearing. Amended Motion by Council Member Hedges to delete reference to Development Agreements #5, 7, 8, 9 and 10; and request that Development Agreements #4 and 6 be brought back to the City Council within 30 days. Volume 51 - Page 697 City of Newport Beach City Council Minutes January 26, 1998 INDEX The amended motion carried by the following roll call vote: Ayes Noes: Abstain: Absent: Thomson, Debay, Hedges, Glover, Noyes, Mayor Edwards O'Neil None None 27. CONTINUED APPEAL HEARING ON THE APPLICATION OF WINDOWS ON THE BAY RESTAURANT (SCOTT SHUTTLEWORTH, APPLICANT) FOR USE PERMIT NO. 3293 (AMENDED) ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2241 WEST COAST HIGHWAY - REQUEST TO AMEND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF AN EXISTING FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT TO CHANGE THE OPERATIONAL HARACTERISTICS (contd. from 11/24/97). -. Ma ..r Edwards asked for Council Member Glover to provide a brief update. Counci ember Glover began by clarifying some of the background informati:.. provided in the staff report. At the City Council meeting of November +, 1997, the City Council directed Council Member Glover to meet with Jo. - Crab Shack to resolve some of the issues associated with that property, th Scott Shuttleworth, manager of Windows on the Bay, and also with the ..pellants, Mr. & Mrs. Weinberg. Council Member Glover stated that she has nce met with each. Both the attorney for Joe's Crab Shack and Mr. Shutt l• orth agreed to meet with Mr. & Mrs. Weinberg and the other residents of o Isle. Mr. & Mrs. Weinberg declined the offer through correspondence da •d December 23, 1997. Council Member Glover the referred to Mr. Shuttleworth's letter of January 14, 1998. She noted t t in that letter, Mr. Shuttleworth makes some concessions to the requests .f the Planning Commission. Council Member Glover stated that later she -t with Mr. & Mrs. Weinberg, Carolyn' Klein and Planning Director Temple. t that meeting, she understood the complaints from the residents of Lido Is > eem to be directed at Joe's Crab Shack, and not Windows on the Bay. Coun ' Member Glover feels that the residents have concerns about Windows on t Bay because of the problems associated with Joe's Crab Shack. Council Member Glover also explained Windows on e Bay and how it sits on the bay. She stated that the outside dining is actuon the parking lot side of the building, enclosed with plexiglas. She saiat the bar is not right out on the bay, but on an inset. Council Member Gl. er reminded the City Council that the decision made on the Windows on the y application will set a precedence for other establishments on the bay. f{ Planning Director Temple explained the options available to , e City Council. She stated that if the decision of the Planning Commi_ 'on is sustained, the original Exhibit A, dated October 23, 1997, wo be appropriate. A Revised Exhibit A was also provided in the staff report t : t incorporated the requests of Mr. Shuttleworth's letter of January 14, 199 Windows on the Bay Use Permit 3293 (88) Volume 61-Page 598 i CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT 33oo NEWPORT BOULEVARD NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 (714) 644-3200/ FAX (714) 644-3750 Hearing Date: January 26, 1998 Agenda Item No.: 26 Staff Person: Eugenia Garcia 644-3208 REPORT TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Status Report on Development Agreements Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 PURPOSE: REQUIRED ACTION: Background To conduct an annual review of current Development Agreements to review the applicants' good faith and substantial compliance with each agreement in addition to those terms and conditions required of the City of Newport Beach. Hold hearing; if desired, determine compliance, modify or terminate: DevelopmentAgreement No. 4 The Irvine Company, Library Exchange Agreement Development Agreement No. 5 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian DevelopmentAgreement No. 6 The Irvine Company, Circulation Improvement and Open Space Agreement Development Agreement No. 7 Pacific View Memorial Park Development Agreement No. 8 Ford Motor Land Development Corporation Development Agreement No. 9 Fletcher Jones Motor Cars Development Agreement No. 10 Newport Harbor Lutheran Church This report contains the annual performance review of development agreements approved by the City of Newport Beach. Development Agreements 1, 2, and 3 are not included in this review for the reasons described below. Development Agreement No. 1 between the City of Newport Beach and Park Lido, Ltd. was approved by the City Council (Ordinance No. 83-7) on January 24, 1983. This agreement required that Park Lido, Ltd. advance 50% of the cost of the installation of' a traffic signal at the intersection of Hospital Road and Placentia Avenue in exchange for the approval of the development of a 65,269 square foot two-story medical office building located at 351 Hospital Road. The specific project approved was never pursued and all approvals sunsetted after 24 months. Subsequently, a second project was approved and constructed without a development agreement. The traffic signal which was addressed in the original agreement has been installed. Development Agreement No. 2 between the City of Newport Beach and the Irvine Company was approved by the City Council on April 22, 1985. This agreement was to allow the construction of 888 residential dwelling units and 50,000 square feet of commercial development in the North Ford Planned Community, and 295,000 square feet of office development in the Koll Center Newport Planned Community. This project has been completed and the terms and conditions of DevelopmentAgreementNo. 2 have been satisfied. Development Agreement No. 3 between the City of Newport Beach and the J. M. Peters Co. was approved by the City Council (Ordinance No. 85-24) on September 23, 1985. This agreement established specific development rights and related obligations pursuant to the annexation of the Bayview site to the City of Newport Beach. This project has been completed and the terms and conditions of Development AgreementNo. 3 have been satisfied. Discussion The City of Newport Beach has entered into seven development agreements in conjunction with the approval of several development projects within the City in order to achieve maximum utilization of resources to the owners, while minimizing the economic cost to the public. The development agreements represent certain assurances to the owners that they may proceed with development of certain properties in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval. In approving these development agreements, the City provided the opportunities for strengthening the public planning process, encouraging private participation in comprehensive planning, and reducing the economic costs of development. The approval process has provided the City with the opportunity to gain from the applicants certain public benefit improvements such as streets, sewer facility improvements, public facilities, drinking water, utility facilities and open space. Individual development agreements specify the duration of the agreement, the duration for the completion of total build -out, circulation improvements, or dedication of open space. In some cases, terms of the agreements span a 20-25 year time frame. The development agreements specify permitted uses of the properties, density, intensity of use, maximum height and size of proposed buildings and provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes, which may also be included in the respective Planned Community Texts (PC's) for each development. The development agreements, in some cases, provide that construction be commenced and completed within a specified time period or accomplished in phases. Pursuant to the requirements of Section 15.45.070 of the Municipal Code, Article 2.5, Section 65865.1 of the California Government Code, and stated conditions of each development agreement, 2 the attached status reports have been prepared for each development agreement between the City and the above stated applicants. The purpose of this review is to establish the status of each development agreement and to assess compliance with the terms and conditions that have not been accomplished since the last annual review. Those terms and conditions that were noted as completed on the last annual review are not included in this report. The Development Agreements included in this annual review and their dates of adoption are listed below: Develop. Agrmt. No. 4 5 Applicant The Irvine Company, Library Exchange Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian The Irvine Company, Circulation Improvement and Open Space Agreement 7 Pacific View Memorial Park 8 Ford Motor Land Development Land Corporation 9 Fletcher Jones Motor Cars 10 Newport Harbor Lutheran Church Conclusion Date of Adoption 1/13/92, ORD 91-46 5/26/92, ORD 92-3 Amended 2/14/94 9/14/92, ORD 92-35, Amended 9/11/95, ORD 95-42 7/10/95, ORD 95-26 7/24/95, ORD 95-27 9/11/95, ORD 95-43 6/23/97, ORD 97-22 The decision before the City Council is whether to determine compliance with the terms of Development Agreements 4 though 10, to modify any of the Agreements, or, if there is not substantial compliance with the terms of an Agreement, to terminate the Development Agreement. Submitted by: SHARONZ. WOOD Assistant City Manager gt Prepared by: EUGENIA GARCIA Associate Planner 3 LIBRARY EXCHANGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, NO. 4 Project Status Report Review of the Development Agreement by and between The City of Newport Beach and The Irvine Company I. Introduction On January 13, 1992, a Development Agreement between e City of Newport Beach and The Irvine Company was approved by City Coun ' Ordinance No. 91-46. The Development Agreement and the approval of a se '-s of actions allowed the City to exchange a two -acre library site in the Civic Plaza •: ea for a four -acre site in the Newport Village area. In order to facilitate development of the Planned Community, on April 27, 199 approved as part of the original Libr ft. of allowable office development Civic Plaza Planned Community. consistency with the existing Lo West. Due to conditions un Coastal Program Amendme withdrawn from Coastal C City Council approved r Coastal Program Ame Amendment No. 756. the Corporate P1 "Unclassified" Di II. Purpose w Central Library in the Newport Village the City Council amended the entitlements xchange Agreement by transferring 30,000 sq. om Corporate Plaza West Planned Community to This transfer was necessary in order to maintain Coastal Program Land Use Plan for Corporate Plaza ceptable to the City and The Irvine Company, Local No. 24 and the Library Development Agreement were mmission consideration on April 9, 1992. As a result, the sions to Development Agreement No. 4 and initiated Local ment No. 26, General Plan Amendment 755, and General Plan he changes also amended the Districting Maps so as to reclassify West Planned Community District to the "Open Space" and icts. The purpo .e of Development Agreement No. 4 was to allow the City to exchange a two - acre exis ng library site in the Civic Plaza Planned Community for a four -acre site owned by Th- rvine Company in the Newport Village Planned Community. The term of the Deve spment Agreement is to continue until all permits required for the construction, occ.pancy, and operation of the project have been issued, not to exceed 20 years., The a. 'ption of Devlelopment Agreement No. 4 does not preclude the City of Newport Beach m conducting future discretionary reviews in connection with the project, in compliance with the plans, ordinances and policies in effect as of the effective date of the agreement, nor does it prevent the City from imposing conditions or requirements to 1 HOAG HOSPITAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 5 Project Status Report Annual Review of the Development Agreement by and between The City of Newport Beach and Hoag Memorial Hospital I. Introduction On May 11, 1992, the City of Newport Beach certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 142 for the Hoag Hospital Master Plan and adopted a Planned Community Development Plan and District Regulations for Hoag Hospital. On May 26, 1992, the City of Newport Beach approved Development Agreement No. 5 between the City and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian. It was recorded in the Recorder's office in the County of Orange on August 4, 1993. On February 14, 1994, the Development Agreement was amended by the City Council to incorporate revisions requested by the staff of the California Coastal Commission and the revised Development Agreement was recorded on March 23, 1994. The California Coastal Commission approved the revised Development Agreement on April 14, 1994, and amended the Coastal Development Permit on July 21, 1995. II. Purpose The purpose of Development Agreement No. 5 is to enable Hoag Hospital to develop the hospital property consistent with a Master Plan and Planned Community Development Plan and within the approvals set forth by the Coastal Development Permit issued by the California Coastal Commission. The future development of the Hoag Hospital property will allow the hospital to offer additional and needed services for the community by responding to the ever changing health and medical care technologies and delivery systems. The Development Agreement spells out strict, binding limits on the amount and height of permitted development and insures compliance with conditions related to density, location, and timing of construction to minimize, to the extent feasible, any environmental impacts of the proposed expansion. The Development Agreement includes requirements for dedication of property, construction of public improvements and/or the installation of landscaping visible to the public, which,lyvhen considered in conjunction with the public services provided by Hoag, benefit the general public. Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 15.45 of the Municipal Code and Section 5 of the Development Agreement, Hoag Memorial Hospital or its successor(s) in interest is to 1 1 submit an annual report for review by the City Council demonstrating good faith substantial compliance with the terms of the Agreement. Documentation submitted by Hoag Hospital substantiating good faith compliance with the Development Agreement was submitted to the City on June 25, 1995, for the first annual review and on May 8, 1996 (as amended on October 2, 1996, at the City's request) for the second annual review. City staff subsequently requested that the reporting period for the Development Agreement annual review be changed from April 15 ending date to a July 1 ending date to correspond with City Council's review of all Development Agreements with the City of Newport Beach. The attached project status report is for the third annual review, July 1, 1996 to July 1, 1997. Hoag Hospital submitted a detailed status report which divides the annual review between compliance with the requirements of the Development Agreement (public benefits, exactions), and compliance with the requirements of the Mitigation Measures. Since July, when the project status report was submitted by Hoag Hospital, the hospital received a "Permit to Construct" the flare relocation/scrubber installation project from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (on September 19, 1997). An amendment to the Coastal Development Permit from the California Coastal Commission for the flare relocation project was issued on October 27, 1997. The City Council approved the design and relocation of the methane gas mitigation system on December 8, 1997. The flare design plans are in final review with the City and building permits are pending. The annual review includes a review of the following: Development Agreement obligations and Environmental Document Mitigation Measures. • For this review period, the conditions and mitigation measures that are required per the Development Agreement are listed below with an explanation as to how the requirements were or are being met. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 5 3.2. Compliance with Master Plan Conditions/Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measure No. 42 This Mitigation Measure requires that City staff, on an annual basis, send a letter to each emergency vehicle company serving Hoag Hospital, requesting that they turn off their sirens upon entering the hospital property. This request is in order to minimize the noise impacts to adjacent residents. Hoag has provided the City with a lifit of emergency vehicle companies, and letters have been sent by staff to the listed companies. See Table 2 in the Appendix. 2 • 8.2 Exactions: Hoag shall, as a condition to the right to develop, do the following: (a) Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate and Grade the Proposed Linear and Consolidated View Park. The Offer to Dedicate has been recorded and the Dedication has been accepted by the City. The two parks are part of the approved grading plan for the lower campus parking lot which has been completed. The linear park has been completed and the view park (Sunset View Park) is in the process of completion. (b) Public Improvement Funds ($250,000.00). Hoag Hospital is to pay the amount to the City to fund the following improvements: (i) The construction of a sidewalk and installation of landscaping in the CalTrans right-of-way along the west side of Newport Boulevard southerly of Hospital Road. This amount was paid to the City by Hoag. New sidewalks are planned to be constructed in conjunction with the Arches Interchange construction. (ii) and, if funds remain, the construction of facilities necessary to bring reclaimed water to West Newport and/or the Property. This amount has been paid to the City by Hoag Hospital during the second annual review period. The total amount of money that was paid by Hoag will be spent on the construction of sidewalks in conjunction with the Arches Interchange project. There will not be any remaining funds available for a reclaimed water project due to the costs of improvements ' associated with the Arches Interchange construction. (c) Study of possible future improvement in and around the easterly end of Semeniuk Slough. City staff and the P.B.&R. Commission studied the use of this area and no improvements were found to be feasible. 3 Q Notices and staffs report sent to: Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian 301 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 Attention: President Tim Paone Paone, Callahan, McHolm & Winton 19100 Von Karman, 8th Floor P.O. Box 19613 Irvine, CA.92713-9613 City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Post Office Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92663-3884 Attention: Kevin Murphy, City Manager City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Post Office Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92663-3884 Attention: Robert Burnham, City Attorney City Clerk City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Post Office Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92663-3884 4 10 Project Status Report July 1, 1996 - July 1, 1997 Annual Review of Development Agreement between the City ofNewpoit Beach and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian I Introduction On August 4, 1993, the Development Agreement between the City of Newport Beach and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian was recorded. On February 14, 1994, the City Council amended the Development Agreement to incorporate revisions requested by the staff of the California Coastal Commission, and the revised Development Agreement was subsequently recorded on March 23, 1994. On April 14, 1994, the California Coastal Commission approved Hoag Hospital's Development Agreement with the City. Section 5 of the Development Agreement requires an annual review to be conducted by the City of the Hospital's good faith substantial compliance with the Development Agreement. Based on the California Coastal Commission's approval of the Development Agreement on April 14, 1994, the annual review period was, therefore, established as April 15 of each year following the approval of the Development Agreement by the California Coastal Commission. Documentation from Hoag Hospital substantiating good faith compliance with the Development Agreement was submitted to the City on June 25, 1995, for the first annual review and on May 8, 1996 (as amended on October 2, 1996, at the City's request) for the second annual review. City staff subsequently requested that the reporting period for the Development Agreement annual review be changed from an April 15 ending date to a July 1 ending date to correspond with City Council's review of all Development Agreements within the City of Newport Beach. Therefore, this project status report, for the third Development Agreement annual review, is for the year July 1, 1996 to July 1, 1997. II ,Summary of Previous Development Agreement Annual Reviews The project status report for the first annual review documented Hoag Hospital's compliance with the Development Agreement as related to three development projects undertaken during that annual review period: the 5,990-square-foot Cardiac Services Addition on the Upper Campus, the Emergency Care Unit Parking Lot/Entry Reconfiguratioti6(also located on the Upper Campus), and the Flare Relocation/Scrubber Installation project, located on the Lower Campus. The Cardiac Services Addition and the Emergency Care Unit Parking Lot/Entry Reconfiguration were completed during the 1995-1996 annual review period. The plans for the Flare Relocation/Scrubber Installation project, which were originally approved by the City on November 4, 1994, 1 11 Hoag Development Agreement Third Annual Review July 8, 1997 were not implemented, based on subsequent modifications to the project, which are discussed further below. During the second annual review period, the Lower Campus Parking. Lot project was documented for compliance with the Development Agreement. A Coastal Development Permit for the construction of the 351-space ancillary parking lot was received on October 11, 1995. On March 7, 1996, plans for the Lower Campus Parking Lot were submitted to the City. The implementation of the parking lot project is discussed under the current year's project status report. The Flare Relocation/Scrubber Installation project plans were revised during the second annual review period, based on City plan check comments, and the City re -approved the project on November 15, 1995. However, these plans were not implemented, as the City and Hoag Hospital initiated legislation to fund the relocation of the flare and to install a system that would'better meet the needs of the West Newport area by more efficiently extracting methane gas. The legislation was subsequently withdrawn by the City because the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) agreed to fund $750,000 for the Flare Relocation/Scrubber Installation project. III. Project Status Review for the Third Development Agreement Annual Review This project status report includes a review of projects initiated or in process during the third annual review period, July 1, 1996 to July 1, 1997. On September 17, 1996, the City issued permits for the construction of the Lower Campus Parking Lot project. During the bulk of' the third annual review period, the Lower Campus Parking Lot was under construction. The project was completed and final City approval was received on June 11, 1997. On September 9, 1996, the City Council approved a Cooperative Agreement between the City and Caltrans to formalize funding commitments and fund disbursement procedures/requirements for the Flare Relocation/Scrubber Installation project. During the third annual review period, the City and Hoag explored options for the relocation of the flare and the installation of an upgraded system. On October 23, 1996, the South Coast Air Quality Management District issued a Permit to Construct the project. Based on additional revisions to the plans, to include additional monitoring and safety devices, the plans were resubmitted to the South Coast Air Quality Management District on June 17, 1997, for a new permit. At the end of the third annual review period, the plans were under review b"y/the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Plans for the flare project were also submitted on June 20, 1997, to the California Coastal Commission for a revision to the existing Coastal Development Permit which allowed 2 1a Hoag Development Agreement Third Annual Review July 8, 1997 modifications to the existing flare system. At the end of the third annual review period, the plans were under review by the California Coastal Commission. The plans for the upgraded flare project were submitted to the City on June 10, 1997, and are in the process of being reviewed by City staff. The mitigation measures related to the original flare project were all completed and approved by City staff in-1994. As part of the upgraded flare project, the Planning Department reviewed all mitigation measures completed for the originally -proposed project to determine which measures would be required to be readdressed as part of the upgraded project. Based on that review, a revised mitigation monitoring plan was prepared and submitted to the Planning Department for the City's use in its review of the project plans. Hoag Hospital also processed plans for an addition to its central plant to include emergency generators. The Planning Department determined that a separate mitigation monitoring plan would ndt be requited for the generator project, due to the narrow scope of the project. However, the Planning Department did identify several mitigation measures that were required to be fulfilled. These mitigation measures were satisfied during the third annual review period, and permits are expected to be issued for the project within the next month. IV. Mitigation Monitoring Program As part of the approval of the Development Agreement by the City, and its subsequent approval by the California Coastal Commission, the City was required to formally adopt a mitigation monitoring plan. On June 13, 1994, the City adopted the Hoag Hospital Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan. Section 5.4 of the Development Agreement requires that the annual review include a detailed report of compliance with the mitigation measures' identified in the mitigation monitoring plan. The mitigation annual review is included as the Appendix to the project status report. 3 /3 APPENDIX PROJECT STATUS REPORT ANNUAL REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AND HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN 4E Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Development Agreement Mitigation Annual Review July 1, 1996 to July 1, 1997 I Introduction On May 11, 1992, the City of Newport Beach certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 142 for the Hoag Hospital Master Plan, and adopted a Planned Community Development Plan and District Regulations for the implementation of the Master Plan. At the same time, the City entered into a Development Agreement with Hoag Hospital. The Development Agreement was subsequently amended to incorporate changes requested by the California Coastal Commission in conjunction with its review of a mass grading permit application by Hoag Hospital. Section 5 of the Development Agreement requires that the City conduct an annual review of the Development Agreement in order to evaluate Hoag Hospital's good faith substantial compliance with the Development Agreement. As part of that annual review, a review of compliance with the mitigation monitoring plan (adopted by the City on June 13, 1994) for Hoag Hospital is also required. Specifically, Section 5.4 of the Development Agreement states: Mitigation Review. The annual review shall include a detailed report of compliance with the various conditions and mitigation measures contained within the mitigation monitoring plan. The report shall include an analysis of the view impacts of buildings constructed in comparison to the anticipated views as depicted in the EIR. For the five year monitoring period imposed by the Department of Fish and Game Streambed Alteration Agreement entered into between the Department of Fish and Game and Hoag, the annual review shall also assess the success of any off -site wetlands mitigation. Five years after the completion of the Department of Fish and Game monitoring period, Hoag shall submit a final report assessing the success of the off -site wetlands mitigation in its annual review. If the survival and cover requirements set forth in the Streambed Alteration Agreement have not been met, Hoag shall be responsible for replacement planting to achieve these requirements. Hoag shall be found in compliance with this Agreement unless the City Council determines, based upon the evidence presented at the Annual Review, that Hoag not complied with all mitigation measures and conditions including those imposed as a result of subsequent environmental analysis, applicable to the grading of, or building on, the Property as of the date of the Annual Review. 1 IS Hoag Development Agreement Mitigation Annual Review July 8, 1997 This document is being submitted in compliance with the Development Agreement requirement stated above for the year July 1, 1996 to July 1, 1997. II Format/Contents of the Mitigation Annual Review There are three categories of mitigation measures included in the adopted mitigation monitoring program - measures that need to be complied with only once, measures that relate to individual development projects undertaken by Hoag Hospital, and mitigation measures which are required to be implemented on an ongoing basis and documented annually. The "Hoag Hospital Development Agreement - Mitigation Annual Review" (Table 1) summarizes, in matrix format, the applicability of all mitigation measures to each of the three categories of mitigation measures. During annual review periods when mitigation monitoring plans completed for specific projects are being reviewed by the City, the "project -specific mitigation measures" are further broken down to include these individual projects. Also, as stated above, Section 5.4 requires that for the "five year monitoring period imposed by the Department of Fish and Game Streambed Alteration Agreement entered into between the Department of Fish and Game and Hoag, the annual review shall also assess the success of any off -site wetlands mitigation." The first year of the five year monitoring period for the off -site wetlands occurred during the third annual review period for the Development Agreement. On January 22, 1997, the "First Annual Monitoring Report for 6.08-Acre Freshwater Marsh Creation at the San Joaquin Freshwater Marsh Reserve Pursuant to California Department of Fish and Game Streambed Alteration Agreement Number 5-306-93 and United States Army Corps of Engineers Authorization Number 93-00858-BH" was submitted to the 'reviewing agencies. This report documented the mitigation requirements, methodology for documenting compliance with the performance standards for vegetative growth, results from the field measurements of plant growth, and ongoing site maintenance. The Department of Fish and Game and the United States Army Corps of Engineers require that the annual report be submitted on January of each year subsequent to the initiation of the mitigation project. Since the planting was not completed until May of 1996, the first annual report documents seven, rather than twelve, months of plant growth. According to the First Annual Monitoring Report, the one-year success criteria for percent vegetative cover is thirty percent. The field measurements undertaken as part of the First AniiGal Monitoring Report found that while "...the project has not yet reached its twelfth month, the transect data shows that the first -year 30-percent cover standard has been satisfied: native plant species cover 30.77 percent of the non -open water portions of the project site." 2 16 Hoag Development Agreement Mitigation Annual Review July 8, 1997 III. Project -Specific Compliance Project -specific mitigation measures relate to individual 'projects processed under the Master Plan. These measures may be applicable to only one specific project, or they may be applicable to more than one project. Two projects *ere in process during the third annual review period: the generator project and the upgraded flare project. The generator project, which included an addition to the Hoag central plant to contain emergency generators, did not have a separate mitigation monitoring plan prepared, due to its narrow scope, although the Planning Department did require that several of the mitigation measures in the adopted mitigation monitoring plan be addressed. These mitigation measures were completed during the third annual review period. The upgraded flare project was under review by the City, the California Coastal Commission and le South Coast Air Quality Management District during the third annual review period. Table 1, "Hoag Hospital Development Agreement Mitigation Annual Review" identifies the mitigation measures that are applicable to the upgraded flare project. This list of applicable mitigation measures does not include all of' those contained in the original flare project, only those that were determined by the Planning Department to require additional review as part of the upgraded flare project. City staff is currently reviewing documentation prepared to comply with the mitigation measures as part of its plan review process. IV Annual Review As part of the Mitigation Monitoring Program adopted for the Hoag Master Plan by the City of Newport Beach on June 13, 1994, several mitigation measures were required to be implemented on an basis and to be monitored for compliance on an annual basis. These mitigation measures and a summary of the compliance with these measures is provided below: * Mitigation Measure #11 requires routine vacuuming of parking lots/structures. All parking lots/structures are cleaned/swept by Hoag Hospital on a weekly basis. * Mitigation Measure #15 requires that master plan development comply with the Hospital's Hazardous Material and Waste Management Program and its Infectious Control Manual. No amendments were required of the above -referenced documents and no new protocols were adopted in order to respond to concems related to h 'ardous materials, waste management and infectious control as a result of projects processed during the third annual review period. * Mitigation Measure_#28 requires adherence to South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) regulations that pertain to trip reductions. On 3 )el Hoag Development Agreement Mitigation Annual Review July 8, 1997 January 15, 1997, Hoag Hospital submitted its Triennial Employee Commute Reduction Program to SCAQMD. This document specifies Hoag's policies/programs that are designed to reduce vehicle trips. * Mitigation Measure #31 requires adherence to measures that were a part of Hoag's pilot program to monitor and manage use of the Upper andiower Campus service roads during non -working hours. Since 1991, Hoag has been implementing measures to reduce usage of West Hoag Road during non -working hours. These measures include signage controls, annual letters to vendors defining when West Hoag Road can be used, and an annual note in the Hoag Times, the newsletter for Hoag Hospital employees. These measures were again implemented for the third Development Agreement annual review period. In order to monitor traffic volumes on West Hoag Road, Hoag has been taking periodic traffic "Counts. Updated traffic counts were last taken in June 1995. Prior to the implementation of the pilot program, traffic volumes (taken from 9:00 p.m. to 5:00 a.m.) ranged from 124-159 . trips (over a three-day period). Since the implementation of the pilot program in 1991, traffic volumes have dramatically reduced, with 1995 counts averaging 21 trips per day over a three-day period. Traffic volumes will be taken again by Hoag Hospital when its next building is developed, to ensure that the pilot program remains effective as the Lower Campus is developed. * Mitigation Measure #35 requires that Hoag provide new employees information on rideshare services and programs. It also requires that new employees be included in updates to the trip reduction plan (the Triennial Employee Commute Reduction Program) for the SCAQMD. Hoag continues to provide all new employees rideshare service/program information, and new employees were included in the January 15, 1997, update to the Hoag Hospital Triennial Employee Commute Reduction Program. * Mitigation Measure #4O requires that the City of Newport Beach send a letter to each emergency vehicle company serving Hoag requesting that they turn off their sirens upon entering Hospital property in order to minimize noise impacts to adjacent residents. Hoag is required to provide the City with a list of all emergency vehicle companies serving Hoag Hospital. Table 2, Emergency Units Responding to Hoag Hospital, provides a current list of those companies. * MitigatiM Measure #84 requires that Hoag continue compliance with its Hazardous Material and Waste Management Program and its Infectious Control Manual. As stated under Mitigation Measure #15, above, Hoag continues to comply with the above -referenced documents, as well as continues to comply with 4 Hoag Development Agreement Mitigation Annual Review July 8, 1997 all new regulations that have been adopted since the Hoag Master Plan Final Environmental Impact Report was certified. * Mitigation Measure #117 requires that the usage of the Hospital's heliport/helipad be limited to emergency medical purposes or the transportation of critically ill patients in immediate need of medical care not available at Hoag. Further, this mitigation measure requires that, to the extent feasible, helicopters shall arrive at, and depart from, the helipad from the northeast, to mitigate noise impacts on adjacent residences. Hoag continues to comply with Mitigation Measure #117. * Mitigation Measure #119 requires that non -vehicular activities, such as the operation of' the trash compactor, which occur in the vicinity of West Hoag Road shall be operated only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., daily. Hoag continues to comply with Mitigation Measure #119. V. One -Time Compliance Mitigation Measures Some of the mitigation measures required as part of the mitigation monitoring program for the Hoag Hospital Master Plan' are specialized studies or clearances from the City and other governmental agencies that may or may not be related to a specific building or building site. Although these mitigation measures are required to be satisfied only once to fulfill the requirements of mitigation monitoring program, some of the one-time measures may be required to be implemented as part of a specific project(s). Further, the documentation prepared to fulfill these one-time mitigation measures may be amended from time to time% as warranted by project site conditions or proposed development projects. The majority of these one-time compliance mitigation measures were completed during the first and second annual review periods. During the third annual review period, no additional one-time mitigation measures were completed. Table 1, "Hoag Hospital Development Agreement Mitigation Annual Review", identifies the status of all one-time compliance mitigation measures. 5 Table 1 HOAG HOSPITAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT MITIGATION ANNUAL REVIEW Mit. One -Time No Compliance July 1, 1996 to July 1, 1997 Annual Project -Specific Upgraded Compliance Compliance Flare 1 X X 2 X X 3 X 4 X 5 X 6 C OMPLE'1'b 7 COMPLETE 8 COMPLETE • 9 X 10 X X 11 X 12 X 13 X 14 X 15 X 16 COMPLETE 17 COMPLETE 18 COMPLETE 19 COMPLETE 20 COMPLETE 21 X 22 X 23 COMPLETE 24 X X 25 X 26 X 27 X 28 X 29 X 30 X Table 1, Continued HOAG HOSPITAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT MITIGATION ANNUAL REVIEW Mit. One -Time No Compliance July 1, 1996 to July 1, 1997 Anneal Project -,Specific Upgraded Compliance compliance Flare 31 X 32 X 33 X 34 X 35 X 36 37 X 38 X 39 X 40 X 41 COMPLETE 42 X 43 44 X 45 X 46 X 47 CUMPLE1'E 48 49 50 COMPLETE 51 COMPLETE 32 COMPLff l'E 53 COMPLETE X 54 X 55 .X X 56 COMPLETE 57 X 38 X �� X 59 X 60 X X 61 X - X -?4 Table 1, Continued HOAG HOSPITAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT MITIGATION ANNUAL REVIEW Mit One -Time No. Compliance July 1, 1996 to July 1, 1997 Annual Project -Specific Upgraded compliance compliance Elam 62 COMPLETE 63 COMPLETE 64 X 65 COMPLETE 66 X 67. COMPLETE 68 X 69 X 70 X 72 X /3 X 74 X X /5 X X 76 X X /'/ COMPLETE 78 X X /9 X 80 X X 81 COMPLETE 82 X 83 X 84 X 85 X 86 . X 87 X 88 X 89 X 90 COMPLETE 91 X X 92 X as Table 1, Continued HOAG HOSPITAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT MITIGATION ANNUAL REVIEW Mit. One -Time No. Compliance July 1, 1996 to July 1, 1997 Annual Project -Specific Upgraded Compliance Compliance Elam 93 X 94 X 95 X 96 X 99 X 98 X 99 X 100 X 101 X 102 X 103 . X 104 X 105 X 106 107 108 X 109 - X 110 111 112 113 COMPLETE 114 COMPLETE 115 COMPLETE 116 COMPLETE 117 X 118 X 119 q( X 120 COMPLETE 121 122 123 COMPLETE • a3 Table 2* EMERGENCY UNITS RESPONDING TO HOAG HOSPITAL July 1, 1997 Newport Beach Fire Department NM-2 475 32nd Street Newport Beach, CA 92660 Newport Beach Fire Department NM-3 868 Santa Barbara Avenue Newport Beach, CA 92660 Costa Mesa Fire Department MM81 2803 Royal Palm Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Costa Mesa Fire Department MM 83 1865 Park Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Costa Mesa Fire Department MM 85 Civic Center Station, 2450 Vanguard Way Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Costa Mesa Fire Department MM 82 800 Baker Street Costa Mesa, CA 92626 t'I Santa Ana Fire Department SAM-4 1427 South Broadway Santa Ana, CA 92707 Huntington Ambulance Service P.O. Box 145 Sunset Beach, CA 90742 Med Trans Ambulance Company 2131 Placentia Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Schaefer Ambulance Company 2215 South Bristol Santa Ana, CA 92704 Doctor's Ambulance Company 23095 Terra Drive Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Medix Ambulance Company 310 West 18th Street Tustin, CA 92680 Careline Ambulance Company P.O. Box 70014 Anaheim, CA 92825 Mercy Air Ambulance P.O. Box 2532 Fontana, CA 92334-2532 * The emergency units provided in Table 2 frequent Hoag Hospital on a regular basis.. Additional emergency service units also serve Hoag Hospital on a less frequent basis. Table 2, Continued EMERGENCY UNITS RESPONDING TO HOAG HOSPITAL July 1, 1997 Costa Mesa Fire Department MM 84 2300 Placentia Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Orange County Fire Department ORCO1-4 ' 2 California Irvine, CA 92715_ Laguna Beach Fire Department LM-2 285 Agate Street Laguna Beach, CA 92651 Search and Rescue (SAR) MCAS El Toro Air Force Base Santa Ana, CA 92709-5020 Newport Beach Police Department P.O. Box 7000 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Costa Mesa Police Department 99 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 * The emergency units provided in Table 2 frequent Hoag Hospital on a regular basis. Additional emergency service units also serve Hoag Hospital on a less frequent basis. fi CIOSA AGREEMENT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 6 Project Status Report Review of the Development Agreement between the City of Newport Beach and The Irvine Company Involving the Proposed Circulation Improvement and Open Space Agreement I. Introduction On September 14, 19 , the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 92-35 adopting Development Agreement o. 6, through which the City of Newport Beach and The Irvine Company entered into th Circulation Improvement and Open Space Agreement (CIOSA), which involves twve parcels owned by The Irvine Company within the City of Newport Beach. Of the twe ve, nine are within the coastal zone boundary. The nine parcels are known as San Diego Creek South, San Diego Creek North, Jamboree/MacArthur, Upper Casta ays, Bay View Landing, Newporter North, Newport Knoll, Newporter Resort and Co ..rate Plaza West. Seven of the nine parcels are adjacent to Upper Newport Bay. The CIOSA was authorized pursuant to • overnment Code Section 65867 and Chapter 15.45 of the Newport Beach Municipal Cod The agreement was recorded as Document No. 93-0479122 of the Official Records of Or. :e County, California. Pursuant to California Government Code Section . 869, a development agreement is not valid for a development project located in an area r which a local coastal program is required to be prepared and certified unless the Commsion approves such development agreement by formal commission action. Since the D elopment Agreement involves nine sites in the coastal zone, the City of Newport Be. h and The Irvine Company submitted the development agreement to the California C.: stal Commission for their approval. The Coastal Commission identified a number of issue areas w h needed resolution prior to approval. In an attempt to resolve these issues, The Irvine C. pany prepared an addendum to the CIOSA development agreement in order to clarify th • .uthorities of the City and Coastal Commission and resolve the concerns of the Coastal Co ission. On May 24, 19i, the City Council adopted Ordinance 93-8 amending the D elopment Agreement and on June 10, 1993, the California Coastal Commission gave final :.proval to the Circulation Improvement and Open Space Agreement (CIOSA). The agreement was then executed and recorded. In December of 1993, the City Council formed ad hoc committee to develop an implementation strategy for CIOSA. As a result of e 1 a0 City of Newport Beach City Cpuneil Minutes October28, 1996 dining is allowed. She said she doesn't really like the outdoor dining at all in of this particular building because it impacts the setback and it would bafflUr.j.1jt could be on the roof. The motion carried by the following roll call vote.,,,, Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstain: O'Neil, Edwards, Deba , 76,Glover, Watt, Mayor Hedges None None None 31. CITY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS/ANNUAL STATUS REPORT. City Manager Murphy explained that this is a status report on Development Agreements 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9, which the City has entered into with various parties. He said the development agreements are with The Irvine Company, Library Exchange Agreement; Hoag Memorial Hospital; The Irvine Company, Circulation Improvement and Open Space Agreement; Pacific View Memorial Park; Ford Motor Land Development; and Fletcher Jones Motor Cars. He further explained that as a provision of each of the agreements, the Council is required to conduct an annual review on the status of the agreements and conduct a public hearing. Mayor Hedges questioned how long the document has been available to the public and staff responded that it was made available on Wednesday prior to the Council meeting and the parties involved had it for over a month. He requested that in succeeding years the document be available to the public earlier so that they can testify, if they so desire, and also so everyone has enough time to look through it. Council Member Watt, referring to CIOSA, said it was her understanding that the open space parcels were to be dedicated when the development permits were issued for the major properties (Castaways, Newporter North, and Bay View Landing) and asked if the dedications have occurred. City Attorney Burnham said there were three thresholds for dedication: 1) the issuance of the first building permit on Castaways or Newporter North; 2) the completion of the residential development; and 3) that all of the parcels would be developed as entitled. He explained that the open space dedication chart is Exhibit E to the CIOSA report and summarized that Bay View Landing and Newport Knoll were to be dedicated upon the effective date of the agreement; Upper Castaways and Newporter North, and Freeway Reservation North were to be dedicated upon the issuance of the first building permits; San Diego Creek South, San Diego Creek North (which is no longer a candidate), and Jamboree/MacArthur were to be offered for dedication upon the issuance of the last building permit for all projects contained in the agreement, although the company could waive that condition; and Newport Village was to be dedicated upon the issuance of the first building permits for both Upper Castaways and Newporter North. Motion by Council Member Watt to direct staff to bring back a specific status report on November 12, 1996 on CIOSA to clarify the actual dedications. Mayor Hedges opened the item up for public discussion. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Debay, Mr. Murphy stated that if Prop 218 passes it will not changrethese agreements. Motion by Council Member Edwards to receive and file the reports. It was clarified by Mr. Burnham that the motion makes the determination of good Volume 50 - Page 337 INDEX TIC/Library ii4 C-2823 (a) Hoag #5 C-2912 TIC/Open Space 1t6 CIOSA C-2920 Pac View if7 C-3058 Ford Motor lt8 C3059 Fletcher Jones 89 - 3067 (38) I qqN, — Annuta-1 Kcytt ci, City of Newport Beach City Council Minutes October 28, 1996 INDEX faith and substantial compliance with each agreement by the other party, except as to Development Agreement No. 6, which was continued until November 12. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: Ayes: O'Neil, Edwards, Debay, Cox, Glover, Watt, Mayor Hedges Noes: None Absent: None Abstain: None PUBLIC COMMENTS • Maxine Cohen, 118 33rd Street, distributed photos and a letter addressed to the City Council dated October 27, 1998 requesting that consideration be given to changing the parking on 33rd Street on the Balboa Peninsula in the 100 block between Balboa Boulevard and Seashore Drive, from the south to the north side of the street. She reviewed the reasons for her request as tlined in her letter. She further explained that her concerns had been p ksed on to staff who indicated that a poll of residents on the street would be ri+guired in order to get a consensus. Mayor F edges requested that Ms. Cohen's letter be given to the City Manager d that this issue be referred to the Traffic Affairs Committee for review and nsideration. Rose Parvin, 41 31st Street, voiced concerns about the Cannery Village area in conjunction w the 47 liquor licenses that have been granted and the resulting devaluate of her property. Council Member Edwa ds asked Council Member Watt how much money was raised on the Bay to each event. She indicated that she had not heard, however Mr. Murphy Indic 4ed that he thought it was less than Last year due to the smaller turn -out. A member of the public (name t given) thanked the Council for taking a stand against the Mermaid establi went. CONTINUED BUSINESS 32. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMI' Y EE VACANCIES: Motion by Mavor Hedges to appoint Seymou eek as the Marine Industry representative and John Blom as the Corona ,,,.1 Mar representative. The motion carried by the following roll call vote. Ayes: O'Neil, Edwards, Debay, Cox, Glover, att, Mayor Hedges Noes: None Absent: None Abstain: None CURRENT BUSINESS 93. UNSCHEDULED VACANCY ON THE CITY ARTS COMMISS 4 N. Arts (24) EDC (24) Motion by Mavor Hedges to accept the resignation of Ken Marshall e October 16, 1996; appoint Mayor Pro Tem Debay and Council Mem Edwards and O'Neil to the Ad -Hoc Appointments Committee; and direct City Clerk to post and publish a Special Vacancy Notice requesting tha applications be submitted by 4:00 p.m. on Wednesday, November 13, 1996, and schedule the submission of the nominations to the Council on Novembe Volume 50 - Page 338 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY December 2, 1996 TO: Kevin Murphy, City Manager Patricia Temple, Planning Dept. Genia Garcia , Planning Dept. Dennis Danner, Administrative Services FROM: Robert H. Burnham, City Attorney RE: Hoag Development Agreement . Estoppel Certificate I have filled in and signed the Estoppel ' ertificates requested by Hoag Hospital relative to the pending bond issue. A copy of ,yc'Estoppel Certificate is attached for your files. RT H. BURNHAM ity Attorney RHB:cl encl. F:\cat\cris\memo\bob\hoagcert.doc 1ESTOPPEL. CERTIFICATE Date Requested: Date of Certificate: /L On February 14, 1994, the City of Newport Beach approved the "Development Agreement Between the City of Newport Beach and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian" (the "Development Agreement!). This Estoppel Certificate certifies that, as of the "Date of Certificate" set forth above: CHECK WHERE APPLICABLE 1. The Development Agreement adopted February 14, 1994,and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Planned Community Development Criteria and District Regulations adopted May 26, 1992 remain binding and effective; 2. The Development Agreement adopted February 14, 1994 and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Planned Community Development Criteria and District Regulations adopted May 26, 1992 have not been amended; 3. The Development Agreement adopted February 14, 1994 and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Planned Community Development Criteria and District Regulations adopted May 26, 1992 have been amended in the following respects: 4. Neither Hoag nor any of its successors are in default under the Development Agreement adopted February 14, 1994 or the Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Planned Community Development Criteria and District Regulations adopted May 26, 1992; 5. The following defaults exist under the Development Agreement adopted February 14, 1994 and/or Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Planned Community Development Criteria and District Regulations adopted May 26, 1992: PuEL445732 1 I08II22936.0001 11/20/96 -'9ertr; • This Estoppel Certificate May be relied imp by miptrargeree or mortSee of ail), ipterest in the property, any entity-44ia Than or extending credit to Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, or any attorney Of Hoag Memorial HoSpital Presbyterian. ne Pun:45732_1[081[22936.0001 2 11/20/96 R CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-8915 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Newport Beach will hold a public hearing on the application of Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian for amendments to Development Agreement No. 5, on property located at 301 Newport Boulevard and 4000 West Coast Highway. Request to amend the provisions of Development Agreement No. 5 to incorporate changes to the text of the agreement requested by the Coastal Commission staff. The changes will clearly define role of the Coastal Commission in the review and approval of projects on the Hoag Hospital lower campus, as well as incorporating into the Development Agreement a number of already established conditions of approval and mitigation measures. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that all significant environmental concerns for the proposed project have been addressed in a previously certified environmental document, and that the City of Newport Beach intends to use said document for the above noted project, and further that there are no additional reasonable alternative or mitigation measures that should be considered in conjunction with said project. Copies of the previously prepared environmental document are available for public review and inspection at the Planning Department, City of Newport Beach, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California, 92659-1768 (714) 644-3225. Notice is hereby further given that said public hearing will be held on the 13th day of December, 1993, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Newport Beach City Hall, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California, at which time and place any and all persons interested may appear and be heard thereon. If you challenge this project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. For information call (714) 644-3225. 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach at 4- Villa Balboa Community Assn. 4110 Joyce Taylor President c/o Villageway Mgmt. Co. P.O. Box 4708 Irvine, CA 92716 Seawind Community Assn. Sandra Letto, President c/o Progrsssional Mgmt. P.O. Box 19530 Irvine, CA 92713 Towers Association c/6 Dr. J. P. Smith 3121 West Coast Hwy., #6C Newport Beach, CA 92663 Balboa Coves Community Assn. Barbara Garber, Presdient 25 Balboa Coves Newport Beach, CA 92663 Versailles Homeowners Assn. Marilyn Tabor, President 102 Scholz Plaza, Ph. 32 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Seawind Newport Comm. Assn. John Chiarenza, President c/o Villageway Mgmt. Co. P.O. Box 4708 Irvine, CA 92716 Lido Park Assn. Leo Vortouni, President 4308 Patrice Road Newport Beach, CA 92663 Newport Towers H.O. Assn. Harry Cossman, President c/o Villageway Mgmt. Co. P.O. Box 4708 Irvine, CA 92716 • West Newport Beach Assoc. Dave Bent, President 4904 Seashore Dr. Newport Beach, CA 92663 Newport Crest Homeowners Assn Tony Buttacavoli, Vice Pres. c/o Villageway Mgmt. Co. P.O. Box 4708 Irvine, CA 92716 Lido Sands Community Assn. Hope Durio, President P.O. Box 1373 Newport Beach, CA 92663 HOAG HOSPITAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 5 Project Status Report Annual Review of the Development Agreement by and between The City of Newport Beach and Hoag Memorial Hospital I. Introduction On May 11, 1992, the City of Newport Beach certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 142 for the Hoag Hospital Master Plan and adopted a Planned Community Development Plan and District Regulations for Hoag Hospital. On May 26, 1992, the City of Newport Beach approved Development Agreement No. 5 between the City and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian. It was recorded in the Recorder's office in the County of Orange on August 4, 1993. On February 14, 1994, the Development Agreement was amended by the City Council to incorporate revisions requested by the staff of the California Coastal Commission. The revised Development Agreement was recorded on March 23, 1994. The California Coastal Commission approved the revised Development Agreement on April 14, 1994, and amended the Coastal Development Permit on July 21, 1995. II. Purpose The purpose of Development Agreement No. 5 is to enable Hoag Hospital to develop the hospital property consistent with a Master Plan and Planned Community Development Plan and within the approvals set forth by the Coastal Development Permit issued by the California Coastal Commission. The future development of the Hoag Hospital property will allow the hospital to offer additional and needed services for the community by responding to the ever changing health and medical care technologies and delivery systems. The Development Agreement spells out strict, binding limits on the amount and height of permitted development and insures compliance with conditions related to density, location, and timing of construction to minimize, to the extent feasible, any environmental impacts of the proposed expansion. The Development Agreement includes requirements for dedication of property, construction of $ublic improvements and/or the installation of landscaping visible to the public, which, when considered in conjunction with the public services provided by Hoag, benefit the general public. 8 s Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 15.45 of the Municipal Code and Section 5 of the Development Agreement, Hoag Memorial Hospital or its successor(s) in interest is to submit an annual report for review by the City Council demonstrating good faith substantial compliance with the terms of the Agreement. The attached project status report is for the year April 15, 1995 to October 1, 1996. The annual review includes a review of the following: Development Agreement obligations and Environmental Document Mitigation Measures. For this review period, the conditions and mitigation measures that are required per the Development Agreement are listed below with an explanation as to how the requirements were or are being met. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 5 3.2. Compliance with Master Plan Conditions/Mitigation Measures: See attached table. 8. Public Benefits/Exactions: 8.2 Exactions: Hoag shall, as a condition to the right to develop, do the following: (a) Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate and Grade the Proposed Linear and Consolidated View Park. The Offer to Dedicate has been made and recorded. The two parks are part of the approved grading plan for the lower campus parking lot, which is under construction. (b) Public Improvement Funds ($250,000.00). Hoag Hospital is to pay the amount to the City to fund the following improvements: (i) The construction of a sidewalk and installation of landscaping in the CalTrans right-of-way along the west side of Newport Boulevard southerly of Hospital Road., and, if funds remain, ¶E) (ii) The construction of facilities necessary to bring reclaimed water to West Newport and/or the Property. This amount has been paid to the City by Hoag Hospital during the second annual review period. See attached documentation Study of possible future improvement in and around the easterly end of Semeniuk Slough. City staff and the P.B.&R Commission studied the use of this area and no improvements were found to be feasible. 9 Mitigation Measure No.42 This measure requires that the City of Newport Beach send a letter to each emergency vehicle company serving Hoag requesting that they turn off their sirens upon entering hospital property in order to minimize the noise impacts to adjacent residents. Hoag has provided the City with a List of emergency vehicle companies, and letters are being sent by staff to the listed companies. qd 10 G.AG'et CA/ /y2 5C4 t. 5-0.9) 1 /Gc/Gkp•e 6"0/ % ,s/23/9 f fide lre • cop/ €y #b �� Fie positta,NTE T Page _5 of _5 Permit Application No. 5-93-253 Prior to issuance of the coastal development permit, the applicant shall submit, for the review and approval of the Executive Director, temporary landscaping plans for erosion control for each phase of grading. 12. Prior to issuance of the coastal development permit, the applicant shall submit, for the review and approval of the Executive Director, landscaping plans which provide for the City of Newport Beach required setback area adjacent to Pacific Coast Highway to be landscaped. The landscape plan shall include vertical elements which, at maturity, will soften and enhance the facades of the future buildings to be constructed on the site. Drought tolerant plant species shall be used to the extent feasible. The landscaping shall be installed at the earliest possible time upon completion of grading activity within the setback area. 13. Prior to issuance of the coastal development permit, the applicant shall submit, for the review and approval of the Executive Director, a construction phasing and traffic control plan for each phase of the grading, approved by the City traffic engineer. At a minimum the plan shall include limitations on truck hauling traffic during summer weekends (from Memorial Day Weekend to Labor Day Weekend). bll 1743F • • • Exhibit C HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA AND DISTRICT REGULATIONS 1991 Recommended for Approval by the Planning Commission February 20, 1992 Adopted by the City Council City of Newport Beach Ordinance No. 92-3 May 26, 1992 I • • I landscaping and all other areas not devoted to building footprints or vehicular parking and drive surfaces. I Mean Sea Level: a reference or datum mark measuring land elevation using the average level of the ocean between high and low tides. IOutpatient Uses hospital patient services which do not require overnight stay. Residential Care: medically -oriented residential units that do not require the acuity I level generally associated with inpatient services but require overnight stays. Site Are for the purpose of determining development area: 1. Gross - parcel area prior to dedications. l2. Net - parcel area after dedications. I Special Landscaped Streets West Coast Highway is designated as a special landscaped street, containing special landscape requirements. Streets: reference to all streets or rights -of -way within this ordinance shall mean dedicated vehicular rights -of -way. May 26,1992 5 t1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 The setback on West Coast Highway easterly of the hospital entry signal shall be 15 feet. In addition, vertical articulation shall be required for buildings easterly of the signal within 150 feet of the West Coast Highway frontage, as follows: 1st Floor: Up to 18 feet in height no additional articulation is required. If the 1st floor exceeds 18 feet in height, it shall be subject to the articulation requirements of the 2nd Floor. 2nd Floor (up to 32' in height): A minimum of 20% of the building frontage shall be articulated in such a manner as to result in an average 2nd floor setback of 20 feet. 3rd Floor and above: A minimum of 20To of the building frontage shall be articulated in such a manner as to result in an average 3rd floor and above setback of 25 feet. The setback on West Coast Highway westerly of the hospital entry signal shall be 45 feet. In addition, vertical articulation shall be required for buildings westerly of the signal for buildings within 150 feet of the West Coast Highway frontage, as follows: 1st Floor: Up to 18 feet in height no additional articulation is required. If the 1st floor exceeds 18 feet in height, it shall be subject to the articulation requirements of the 2nd Floor. 2nd Floor (up to 32' in height): A minimum of 20% of the building frontage shall be articulated in such a manner as to result in an average 2nd floor setback of 55 feet. 3rd Floor and above: A minimum of 20To of the building frontage shall be articulated in such a manner as to result in an average 3rd floor and above setback of 65 feet. In order to avoid any future structures in this area (within 150 feet of West Coast Highway) from presenting an unacceptable linear mate, no single structure shall be greater than 250 linear feet in width. Additional- ly, 20% of the linear frontage within 150 feet of West Coast Highway shall be open and unoccupied by buildings. May 26,1992 16 t .25 taiihrar't , ` uV • Ii These requirements may be altered for individual buildings,if requested by the hospital, through the site plan review process defined in Section IX. 10% of the linear length of height zones A and B as viewed from the existing bicycle/pedestrian trail, exclusive of that area adjacent to the consolidated portion of the view park, shall be maintained as view corridors between buildings. 3. There will be no building setbacks along the boundary with CalTrans east property at Superior Avenue and West Coast Highway. E 4. A 20 foot setback from property line shall be provided along Newport Boulevard from Hospital Road to a point 600 feet south; a 25 foot setback I from property line shall be provided along the remainder of Newport Boulevard and along the Newport Boulevard/West Coast Highway Interchange. 5. A ten (10) foot building setback from the property line shall be provided along Hospital Road. E. Lighting The lighting systems shall be designed and maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a licensed Electrical Engineer. F. Roof Treatment Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project sponsor shall submit plans which illustrate that major mechanical equipment will not be located on the roof of any structure on the Lower Campus. Rather, such buildings will have clean rooftops. Minor rooftop equipment necessary for operating purposes will comply with all building height criteria, and shall be concealed and screened to blend into the building roof using materials compatible with roofing materials. G. Signs All signs shall be as specified under the Hoag Hospital Sign Program, Part VI. H. Parking All parking shall be as specified in Part VII, Hoag Hospital Parking Regulations. !dry 26,1592 17 1I 1 1 1 E 1 1 1 1 1 • • 1 1 a 1 1 1 i VIII. HOAG HOSPITAL LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS A. Genera( 1. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans, prepared by a registered Architect or under the direction of a Landscape Architect, shall be reviewed by the Planning and Parks, Beaches and Recreation Departments and approved by the Public Work Departments prior to issuance of a building permit and installed prior to issuance of Certificate of Use and Occupancy. The Landscape Plan may include a concept for the roofs and the parking structures. Trees shall not be used, but a planter box or trellis system shall be designed to provide visual relief of parking structures. All landscaping shall conform to the building height limits established in this text. 2. Parking lot trees shall be no less than fifteen (15) gallon size. 3. Shrubs to be planted in containers shall not be less than one (1) gallon size. Ground covers will be planted from (1) gallon containers or from root cuttings. 4. Every effort should be made to avoid using plants with invasive and shallow root systems. 5. Earth berms shall be rounded and natural in character, designed to obscure automobiles and to add interest to the site. Wheel stops shall be so placed that damage to trees, irrigation units and shrubs is avoided. 6. Trees in parking lots should be limited in variety. Selection should be repeated to give continuity. Regular spacing is not required and irregular groupings may add interest. Care should be exercised to allow plants to grow and maintain their ultimate size without restriction. 7. Heavy emphasis shall be placed on the use of drought -resistant native and naturalized vegetation and the use of an irrigation system designed to avoid surface runoff and over -watering. B. Maintenance 1. All planting areas are to be kept free of weeds and debris. 2. Lawn and ground covers are to be kept trimmed and/or mowed regularly. May 26,1992 24 36 N 3. All plantings are to be kept in a healthy and growing condition. Fertiliza- I tion, cultivation and tree pruning are to be carried out as part of regular maintenance. 4. Irrigation systems are to be kept in working condition. Adjustment :end cleaning of system should be part of regular maintenance. 5. Stakes, guys and ties on trees should be checked regularly for correct function; ties to be adjusted to avoid creating abrasions or girdling to the stems. 6. Damage to plantings created bya vandalism, automobile or acts of nature shall be corrected within thirty (30) ) days. C. Special Landscaped Street I West Coast Highway is designated in the Hoag Hospital Planned Community as a special landscaped street. A 15' building setback from right-of-way / property line is required llir along West Coast Highway. Only driveways, parking and signage are allowed in the setback area. Parking areas shall be screened from view of West Coast Highway with landscaped berms. Landscaping along West Coast Highway shall consist of trees, ground cover and shrubbery. All unpaved areas not utilized for parking or circulation shall be landscaped in a similar manner. Tree size to be no less than twenty-four (24) inch box. D. Villa Balboa Landscape Zone I The area between the Villa Balboa/Hoag property line and the loading dock service access road shall be landscaped except for landscapingydriveway, a, will walkway, be to rcothereen ha buffer elements in said area. The purpose residential units from hospital activities.II E. }larking Areas, A minimum of 5% of the surface parking areas shall be devoted to planting areas. Planting areas around building shall not be included in parking area. Planting of trees may be in groups and need not necessarily be in regular spacing. Alternative landscape programs may be developed, including perimeter parking area landscaping, berming and depressing of parking areas. Alternative landscape programs shall be subject to the review of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department and the approval of the111 Planning and Public Works Departments. 1 M+y 26, 1992 25 37i • EXHIBIT C • HOAG HOSPITAL MASTER PLAN PROJECT AMENDMENT NO. 744 MITIGATION MEASURES AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MITIGATION MEASURE SUMMARY 1. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project Sponsor shall document to the City of Newport Beach Building Department that grading and development of the site shall be conducted in accordance with the City of Newport Beach Grading Ordinance and with plans prepared by a registered civil engineer. These plans shall incorporate the recommendations of a soil engineer and an engineering geologist, subsequent to the completion of a comprehensive soil and geologic investigation of the site. Permanent reproducible copies of the "Approved as Built" grading plans shall be furnished to the Building Department by the Project Sponsor. 2. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project Sponsor shall submit documentation to the City of Newport Beach Building Department confirming that all cut slopes shall be monitored for potential instabilities by the project geotechnical engineer during all site grading and construction activities and strictly monitor the slopes in accordance with the documentation. 3. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project Sponsor shall provide to the City of Newport Beach a comprehensive soil and geologic investigation and report of the site prepared by a registered grading engineer and/or engineering geologist. This report shall also identify construction excavation techniques which ensure no damage and minimize disturbance to adjacent residents. This report shall determine if there are any faults on site which could render all or a portion of the property unsafe for construction. All recommendations contained in this investigation and report shall be incorporated into project construction and design plans. This report shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. 4. Prior to the completion of the final design phase, the Project Sponsor shall demonstrate to the City of Newport Beach Building Department that all facilities will be designed and constructed to the seismic standards applicable to hospital related structures and as specified in the then current City adopted version of the Uniform Building Code. 5. Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits for each phase of development, the Building Department shall ensure that geotechnical recommendations included in "Report of Geotechnical Evaluation for Preparation of Master Plan and Environmental Impact Report, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Campus, 301 Newport Boulevard, Newport, California" as prepared by LeRoy Crandall Associates, June, 1989, and in the report prepared' pursuant to Mitigation Measure 3, are followed. 6. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project Sponsor shall conduct a soil corrosivity evaluation. This evaluation shall be conducted by an expert in the field of corrosivity. The site evaluation shall be designed to address soils to at least the depth to which excavation is planned. At a minimum, at least one sample from each soil type should be evaluated. Appropriate personnel protection shall be worn by field personnel during the field evaluation. In the event soils are r • found to be corrosive, the source and extent of the corrosive soils shall be determined, and all buildings and infrastructure shall be designed to control the potential impact of corrosive soils over time. 7. Based on the corrosion assessment and source determination, a soils and construction material compatibility evaluation shall also be undertaken, concluding with the appropriate mitigation measures and design criteria. Corrosion resistant construction materials are commonly available and shall be used where the evaluation/assessment concludes that corrosive soils conditions could adversely impact normal construction materials or the materials used for the mitigation of subsurface gas conditions. For example, there are many elastomers and plastics, like PVC, which are resistant to corrosion by up to 70 percent sulfuric acid at 140 degrees Fahrenheit. 8. Should the soil be identified as hazardous due to the severeness of their corrosivity (i.e., a pH less than 2.5), on -site remediation by neutralization shall be undertaken prior to construction. Appropriate regulatory agency approvals and permits shall also be obtained. 9. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Project Sponsor shall ensure that a construction erosion control plan is submitted to and approved by the City of Newport Beach that is consistent with the City of Newport Beach Grading Ordinance and includes procedures to minimize potential impacts of silt, debris, dust and other water pollutants. These procedures may include: the replanting of exposed slopes within 30 days after grading or as required by the City Engineer. the use of sandbags to slow the velocity of or divert stormflows. the limiting of grading to the non -rainy season. The Project Sponsor shall strictly adhere to the approved construction erosion control plan and compliance shall be monitored on an on -going basis by the Newport Beach Building Department. 10. Prior to the issuance of grading permits the Project Sponsor shall submit a landscape plan which includes a maintenance program to control the use of fertilizers and pesticides, and an irrigation system designed to minimize surface runoff and overwatering. This plan shall be reviewed by the Department of Parks, Beaches and Recreation and approved by the City of Newport Beach Planning Department. The Project Sponsor shall install landscaping in strict compliance with the approved plan. 11. The Project Sponsor shall continue the current practice of routine vacuuming of all existing parking lots and structures and shall also routinely vacuum all future parking lots and structures at current frequencies. Upon implementation of the County of Orange Storm Water Master Plan, routine vacuuming shall be done in accordance with the requirements specified in the plan. 12. Upon completion of final building construction plans, and prior to the issuance of a grading permit for each phase of development, the Project Sponsor shall ensure that site hydrological analyses are conducted to verify that existing drainage facilities are adequate. The applicant shall submit a report to the City of Newport Page 2 r • 4) Information of transportation alternatives shall be provided to all employees. 5) A rideshare vehicle loading area shall be designated in the parking area. 6) The design of all parking facilities shall incorporate provisions for access and parking of vanpool vehicles. or ts located 7) arterials where vpublic transit exists or requiredements shall be isfantic anticipated along Bus stop exist within five years. The exact number of each of the above facilities within each phase of the Master Plan shall be determined by the City during review of grading and buildirg permit applications for each phase. The types and numbers of facilities required of each phase will reflect the content of the Ordinance at the time that a permit application is deemed complete by the Planning Department. 39. If noise levels in on -site outdoor noise sensitive use areas exceed 65 CNEL, the Project Sponsor shall develop measures that will attenuate the noise to acceptable levels for proposed hospital facilities. Mitigation through the design and construction of a noise barrier (wall, berm, or combination walUberm) is the most common way of alleviating traffic noise impacts. 40. Prior to occupancy of Master Plan facilities, interior noise levels shall be monitored to ensure that on -site interior noise levels are below 45 CNEL. If levels exceed 45 CNEL, mitigation such as window modifications shall be implemented to reduce noise to acceptable levels. 41. Prior to issuance of a grading and or building permit the Project Sponsor shall demonstrate to the City that existing noise levels associated with the on -site exhaust fan are mitigated to acceptable levels. Similarly, the Project Sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Building Department that all noise levels generated by new mechanical equipment associated with the Master Plan are mitigated in accordance with applicable standards. 42. The City of Newport Beach shall send a letter to each emergency vehicle company that delivers patients to Hoag Hospital requesting that, upon entrance to either the Upper or Lower Campus, emergency vehicles turn off their sirens to help minimize noise impacts to adjacent residents. Hoag Hospital will provide the City with a list of all emergency vehicle companies that deliver patients to Hoag Hospital. 43. Prior to issuance of grading and building permits, the Project Sponsor shall ensure that a landscape and irrigation plan is prepared for each building/improvement within the overall Master Plan. this plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installation of landscaping with the proposed construction schedule. The plan shall be subject to review by the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department and approval by the Planning Department and Public Works Department. 44. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Project Sponsor shall submit plans to, and obtain the approval of plans from, the City Planning Department which Page 8 HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN 301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100 MEMORANDUM Date: May 17, 1994 To: Distribution From: Leif Thompson z/t74eyt.il-. Vice President Facilities Design & Construction Reference: Hoag Project 1250.16 - Hoag Master Plan Subject: Landscape Conditions to Fulfill Coastal Permit Date: Thursday, May 26, 1994 Time: 2:00. p.m. Place: City Hall, City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Attendees: Pete Foulke, Senior Vice President, Hoag Hospital Genia Garcia, Associate Planner, City of Newport Beach Steve Kellogg, Peridian Peri Muretta, Consultant Patricia Temple, Advanced Planning, City of Newport Beach Leif Thompson, FD&C, Hoag Hospital PF: bw File: 1250.16-36.30-5/26 Agenda K,, Zy PLANNtN4 tta olik; MENT CITY OF i'1 '°PORT BEACH MAY f 1941 AM PM -H- IG, !7, [5) 19, ao GLENN LUKOS ASSOCIATES Regulatory Services CONCEPTUAL MITIGATION PLAN FOR IMPACTS TO AREAS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS PURSUANT TO SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT AND THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 30233(a) OF THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL ACT /9 / I); /, ao '%7/ AND THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 6, SECTION 1603 OF THE CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME CODE HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN MASTER PLAN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA April 23, 1994 Prepared for: Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian 301 Newport Boulevard, Box Y Newport Beach, California 92658-8912 (714) 760-5908 Contact: Peter Foulke Prepared by: Glenn Lukos Associates Contact: Greg Prettyman 23441 South Pointe Drive • Suite 150 • Laguna Hills, California 92653 Telephone: (714) 837-0404 Facsimile: (714) 837-5834 INTRODUCTION This report describes the habitat restoration plan Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian (Hoag Hospital) proposes to implement within the San Joaquin Freshwater Marsh Reserve as mitigation for unavoidable impacts to habitat at their property in Newport Beach. This report is intended to provide information sufficient for the following agency actions: 1) Authorization from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) for use of Nationwide Permit (NWP) 26 pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act; 2) Issuance of a Coastal Development Permit by the California Coastal Commission pursuant to Section 30233(a) of the California Coastal Act; 3) Water Quality Certification by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act; and 4) Issuance of a Streambed Alteration Agreement by the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) pursuant to Chapter 6, Section 1603 of the California Fish and Game Code, if required PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Location The project site is located in the southwest section of the City of Newport Beach, Orange County (Exhibit 1). The Pacific Ocean is approximately one -quarter mile to the southwest, Upper Newport Bay is approximately 2 miles to the east, and the mouth of the Santa Ana River is approximately 1-1/2 miles to the west (Exhibit 2). Hoag Hospital is roughly situated on the northwest corner of the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway (Highway 1) and Newport Boulevard. Hoag Hospital is composed of an Upper and Lower Campus (Exhibit 3). The Lower Campus is the location of habitat which is subject to unavoidable impacts described in the Hoag Hospital Master Plan. The Lower Campus is bounded by Pacific Coast Highway to the south, Superior Avenue to the west, Newport Boulevard to the east, and residential development to the north. Brief Summary of Overall Project The project is a Master Plan Development program for Hoag Hospital. The Master Plan provides the framework for future physical campus growth and/or change on a broad and conceptual scale. Development of the Master Plan will occur over a period of approximately 20 years, and will be regulated by a Planned Community Development Plan (PCDP) and District (City of Newport Beach) Regulations. The Master Plan, PCDP and District Regulations will provide guidelines for development, for expansion of medical programs and for services to the community. These actions are designed to accomplish long-term objectives of facility growth while providing flexibility for development as the demand for medical services and programs change. According to the Master Plan Development program, build out of the Upper and Lower Campus facilities will be implemented in phases. Anticipated development for Phase I includes construction of: 140,000 square feet of outpatient service facilities; 115,000 square feet of inpatient service facilities; 55,000 square feet of support service facilities; 30,000 square feet of administrative facilities on the Lower Campus and a combination of outpatient and inpatient services totalling 140,000 square feet for the Upper Campus. The Master Plan Development program for Phase II and Phase III build out of the Upper and Lower Campuses include approximately 450,000 square feet of residential care, medical/support offices, inpatient and outpatient care facilities and sundry ancillary structures. New Page 1 1 I 1 square footage prescribed as a part of the Master Plan totals approximately 790,438 square feet for both the Upper and Lower Campuses, bringing the Hospital Campus total to 1,343,238 square feet. Project Impacts The action requiring mitigation is the proposed filling of a 1.52-acre cattail marsh as part of development of the Lower Campus. Within the approximate 20-acre Lower Campus is an existing 1.52-acre freshwater marsh. This marsh will be completely and permanently impacted by the development of the Lower Campus as described in the Master Plan. Existing Conditions This isolated 1.52-acre wetland is adjacent to Pacific Coast Highway and was formed following excavation of the bluffs originally occupying the site (see Exhibit 2). Following analysis of aerial photographs dated 1967 and 1977, LSA Associates' (LSA) biologists concluded that the wetland plant communities that presently occur on the site have come into existence only within the past 25 years? The excavated area currently receives seepage which issues from the lower cut slope and its foot, in quantities sufficient to support wetland vegetation consisting primarily of cattails (Typha domingensis) and fleabane (Pluchea odorata). This isolated wetland is neither part of a natural drainage nor a wildlife corridor, and receives a great deal of traffic -generated noise from the abutting Pacific Coast Highway. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangle Newport, California (dated 1965 and photorevised in 1981) indicates no "blue -line" drainages or wetlands on the site. No Federally -listed threatened or endangered plants or animals occur on or in the wetland, the adjacent vegetation or within the general vicinity of the site according to both the California Natural Diversity Database and LSA biologists who performed on -site surveys for such species. MITIGATION PLAN Goals and Objectives The goal of this mitigation plan is to compensate for impacts to the 1.52-acre cattail marsh on Hoag Hospital property through the restoration of 6.08 acres of freshwater marsh within the San Joaquin Freshwater Marsh Reserve (Reserve)(Exhibit 4). The restored freshwater marsh at the Reserve is intended to offer natural functions similar to that of local examples of established freshwater marsh. The proximity of the mitigation site to an existing natural habitat is expected to further enhance the value of this mitigation project. To achieve the project goal it is the plan's objective to implement programs for site grading and preparation, seeding and planting, exotic species control, water management, and biological monitoring. Project Coordination and Development The Reserve is owned and operated by the University of California Natural Reserve System (UCNRS). The UCNRS fully supports this mitigation project, and University staff has been consulted regarding all aspects of project design. Furthermore, the University considers Hoag Hospital's involvement to be a fortuitous source of funding for Reserve enhancement and also considers the University -Private Interest relationship to be a possible precedent setting endeavor; a 1LSA Associates, Inc. "Draft Environmental Impact Report No. 142 for Hoag Hospital Master Plan, Volume I". Prepared for the City of Newport Beach, Planning Department. page 4-24. Page 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 relationship likely to be repeated as other private interests become needy of mitigation opportunities. Letters from University staff expressing support for this project are included as Appendix A. The conceptual mitigation plan is designed to conform to the guidelines of the "San Joaquin Freshwater Marsh Enhancement Plan" (Enhancement Plan) of 1991 - a comprehensive plan for the enhancement and future management of the San Joaquin Marsh? The Enhancement Plan synthesizes extensive background information into a "Refined Enhancement Plan" which represents the most feasible alternative for marsh enhancement in terms of existing conditions and available water supply (Exhibit 5). The conceptual mitigation plan was developed using the Refined Enhancement Plan as a model, and Enhancement Plan coauthor, Michael Josselyn of Wetland Research Associates, Inc. was consulted to ensure mitigation plan compliance with the guidelines described in the Enhancement Plan. The proposed 6.08-acre mitigation site is higher in elevation than most areas in the marsh and, consequently, was selected as the preferred mitigation site because it is considered least likely to transform to wetland naturally. (Nearby, lower elevations support extensive stands of Scirpus sp. and Typha sp.). Review of aerial photographs dating back to 1928 clearly illustrate the changing uses of the San Joaquin Marsh as it evolved from a natural system into a collection of seasonal ponds managed by local duck hunting enthusiasts. Those past management practices together with the construction of the San Diego Creek levee in 1968 have removed the entire San Joaquin Marsh from the natural cycles of inundation and flushing that typically rejuvenate an adjacent marsh. The mitigation design that follows proposes to reintroduce a managed version of these natural processes into a portion of the marsh currently supporting only a scattering of wetland species that are abundant in the wetter portions of the marsh. The Refined Enhancement Plan proposes to convert all but four of the existing seasonal ponds west of Campus Drive to freshwater marsh. The creation of this freshwater marsh will involve the dredging of channels or sloughs to create additional open water habitat. The site that Hoag Hospital is proposing to enhance is a 6.08-acre portion of the Reserve comprised of 4.92 acres of seasonal pond and 1.16 acres of upland/levees (Exhibit 6). Mitigation Site Existing Conditions The proposed 6.08-acre site has a flat bed with elevation ranging from 6.1 feet in its western end to 10.0 feet at its eastern end near San Diego Creek. This portion of the Reserve is generally higher in elevation than those areas to the west, furthest from San Diego Creek. The soil mapped for this site is Omni clay which is ideal for freshwater marsh habitat given its ability to perch surface water. The higher elevation of the mitigation site as compared to nearby cattail -dominated sections of the Reserve has evidently aided in the establishment of a small stand of tamarisk (Tamarix chinensis). Tamarisk is a small, non-native tree that prefers alkaline soils, is salt -tolerant, depends on groundwater for its water supply, and holds little habitat value for native animals. The western edge of the site is supporting the densest stand of Tamarisk, and it is noted that dense stands of Tamarisk 2Philip Williams & Associates, Ltd., Wetland Research Associates, Inc. and Hyden Associates, Inc. 1991. "San Joaquin Freshwater Marsh Enhancement Plan". Prepared for the City of Irvine, the California State Coastal Conservancy, and the University of California Natural Reserve System. 92pp. Page 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 will grow only where groundwater is between 1.5 and 6 m from the surface? Tamarisk's relationship to groundwater suggests that available water in this site is typically too far from the surface to allow establishment of a prevalence of native plant species typically found in coastal southern California freshwater wetlands, and most particularly, within the wetlands of the Reserve (i.e., cattails [Typha sp.] and bulrush [Scirpus sp.]). This evidence supports the choice of this particular site within the Reserve as unlikely to transform to a cattail marsh under natural conditions. The other vegetation within the site includes mulefat (Baccharis salicifolia), poison hemlock (Conium maculatum), one large black willow (Salix gooddingii) and several black willow saplings. The slightly higher elevation portion of the mitigation site is currently supporting artichoke thistle (Cynara cardunculus) and scattered mulefat and saltbush (Atriplex canescens) (Exhibit 7). The levees which surround most of the proposed mitigation site are approximately 2 feet higher than the lowest elevations and are dominated by artichoke thistle and poison -hemlock. Arroyo and black willows (Salix lasiolepis and gooddingii) are found nearby lining the opposite side of the levee to the immediate west. The levees surrounding this and the other seasonal ponds within the Reserve effectively isolate the ponds from surface flows. However, the seasonal ponds do become inundated occasionally, either from direct precipitation or when seasonally elevated groundwater levels are sufficient to surpass the bottom elevations of the ponds. General Design Considerations The proposed 6.08-acre marsh enhancement will be a portion of the larger freshwater marsh planned for the southern end of the Reserve. The mitigation design roughly incorporates the Enhancement Plan's ratio of 40% open water to 60% emergent marsh and utilizes existing levees to define the limits of the mitigation site. These levees will be removed later when resources become available for further expansion of the freshwater marsh. The ultimate removal or breaching of these levees will not impair the function of this mitigation site since future marsh enhancements will be designed with consideration of previous marsh enhancement efforts. Project Management The University will reserve the right to assume management of the project installation, maintenance, and monitoring. In addition to faculty and staff who are qualified to carry out such functions, the University may also utilize qualified students interested in taking on many of the tasks necessary to maintain and monitor the mitigation site. The Marsh Steward (manager of the Reserve appointed by the University) will be responsible for organizing maintenance crews and monitoring visits, as well as for the general supervision of the site. Designated representatives of Hoag Hospital will be available to assume any of the roles described above that the University is unable or unwilling to fill. The monitoring data collected will be transferred to Hoag Hospital, or its designated representative, who will organize the data into the annual reports required by the Corps, CDFG, and the Coastal Commission (see "Monitoring", page 8). 3Kerpez, Theodore A. and Norman S. Smith. 1987. "Saltcedar Control for Wildlife Habitat Improvement in the Southwestern United States". U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Resource Publication #169. 16 pp. Page 4 Funding Hoag Hospital will bear the cost of grading, site preparation, planting, installing water lines, and any other costs associated with project start-up. Following completion of the installation, any expenses necessary for site reconstruction, replanting or other effort to aid in project success will be coordinated with and will be the financial responsibility of Hoag Hospital. These costs are not included in the endowment fund described later under "Habitat Maintenance Program". Implementation Plan Site Preparation and Grading: Before grading begins, eradication of the tamarisk must be accomplished through complete removal of all existing root crowns. Chemical herbicides will not be required since roots or pieces of roots of tamarisk do not sprout or develop into new plants; however, severed stems and shoots do readily root in moist soil so much care will be necessary in the removal of all parts of the plant from the Reserve. Tamarisk seed readily germinates on saturated soils and can remain viable for several weeks following separation from the parent plant; however, the seedlings grow slowly and are unable to survive submergence for more than several weeks. For this reason, the proposed flooding of the mitigation site is expected to deter further tamarisk establishment. Future invasion of tamarisk by seed is not expected to be a major management challenge since no other tamarisk infestations (sources of seed) are currently found within the Reserve. The most important feature of the enhancement plan will be the grading of the site to create the open water portion. (See conceptual grading and planting plan, Exhibit 8) This excavation will be made to a depth of 4-5 feet below the normal waterline for the marsh during the spring months a This depth will ensure that cattails do not colonize the areas of the site intended to be permanent open water. The surface elevation of the other portions of the mitigation site will be lowered one to three feet, depending on their existing elevations. Planting Plan: Existing Typha-Scirpus marsh within the Reserve provides the basic model for the planting design within the mitigation site (Exhibit 8). While it is expected that the desired species will naturally colonize the site, some seeding and transplanting of rhizomes will be done to encourage desired species ratios, accelerate the establishment process, and deter the establishment of weed species. Due to the invasive nature of the common cattail (Typha latifolia) and the greater habitat value of the Scirpus species found at the Reserve, the initial planting of emergent vegetation will include primarily Scirpus species while the cattails will be allowed to self establish. Past experience at the Reserve has suggested that once a stand of Scirpus has become established it is fairly resistant to competition by cattails, and the cattails typically establish themselves quite readily without human intervention, given the correct water regime. Consequently, while the ultimate ratio of Scirpus to cattails within the mitigation site cannot be known, efforts will be made to maximize the percentage of Scirpus present, thereby increasing the habitat value of the site. The common cattail and California tule (Scirpus califomicus), both of which will grow in standing water 1 to 3.5 feet deep, will be the dominant species within most of the site. Olney's bulrush (Scirpus americanus) and alkali bulrush (S. robustus) will be planted in the higher elevations of the site, primarily around the perimeter and near the single arroyo willow found near the center of the site. Black and arroyo willows and mulefat will be planted along the perimeter levee to stabilize the 4The excavated material will be transported to an appropriate upland location. Page 5 banks and to supply additional habitat. Mulefat planting along the perimeter will provide at least 1:1 compensation for mulefat lost during grading. All plant material used within the mitigation site is to be collected from within the Reserve. Rootstock from Scirpus and cattails, cuttings from willows and mulefat, and seeds from those species and more are all available and easily collectable from within the Reserve. Furthermore, limiting the use of plant material to that collected within the Reserve ensures both the genetic integrity of vegetation found within the Reserve and also protects against the introduction of any harmful insect or pathogen into the Reserve that could be carried on imported container stock or seeds. Water Managements: The water management program described in the Enhancement Plan offers a flexible approach to selecting and distributing water to any area within the Reserve. Water will be delivered to the mitigation site via a surface pipe system capable of delivering well water, reclaimed water, or shallow dewatering effluent. The highest quality water available will be used to fill the pond within the mitigation site since this area is likely to concentrate salts due to loss of water by evaporation. The highest quality water available will typically be deep well water; however, if used occasionally, water from other sources may suffice. A deep well with pump is currently in operation and is available to deliver water to the mitigation site. Hoag Hospital will finance the acquisition of piping to deliver water from the pump to the mitigation site. Flushing may be necessary to leach high salt concentrations similar to those seen in the north central part of the Reserve. Flushing may take place as often as every 6-10 years, at the discretion of the Marsh Steward. Acquisition of a portable pump will be financed by Hoag Hospital to allow draining of the mitigation site. The portable pump would also have utility for other areas within the Reserve which require draining. The maintenance of the pump would be covered by funds drawn from the endowment provided by Hoag Hospital. Eventually, with further implementation of the Enhancement Plan, the open water portion of the mitigation site will be connected to open water on both the western and eastern edges to allow circulating water to pass through from higher elevation sections of the marsh toward the central drain (see Exhibit 5). However, the proposed mitigation plan does not require that adjacent portions of the Reserve be enhanced for the mitigation to succeed. Schedule: Project implementation would take place in the late summer or early fall when water levels are at their lowest in the Reserve. Low water elevations are necessary to allow access for heavy equipment operators. Seeding and planting activities will occur between late October and early May to coincide with the rainy season. Drought conditions may allow planting to occur later in the spring if adequate quantities of water are supplied to the site. Habitat Maintenance Program Fundinv: Maintenance and general management activities necessary for the upkeep of the mitigation site and project monitoring will be funded in perpetuity through an endowment, or other similar 5 The water management program described here is presented in greater detail in pages 69-72 of the Enhancement Plan, and is included here as Appendix B. Page 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '1 1 arrangement, provided by Hoag Hospital. Preliminary estimates of the annual per acre operating costs at the Reserve are as follows6: Administrative, Maintenance and General Costs Water acquisition and distribution Total $500.00/acre/year $500.00/acre/year $1,000/acre/year This figure translates to an estimated operating cost of approximately $4,560 per year for the proposed mitigation site. Included within the projected budget are activities such as mosquito control, periodic flushing of the permanent pond, water pumping expenses, weed control, equipment depreciation and maintenance, labor, site monitoring and other routine activities. Costs associated with project start-up, demolition, grading, planting, and monitoring are not included within the annual operating budget and will be borne solely by Hoag Hospital. Costs associated with remediation, replanting or any effort necessary to meet the performance standards established by the resource agencies will be covered by Hoag Hospital. Any amount of the annual operating funds not required for the activities described above will not be returned to Hoag Hospital, but rather, will remain with the University for discretionary use. Maintenance: The purpose of this program is to ensure the success of the mitigation planting. Maintenance will occur over a three year period beginning at the end of project implementation. The following tasks must be performed during the maintenance period: • Contractor Education: The contractor must schedule a meeting with the Marsh Steward previous to the start of the maintenance period in order clearly identify proper maintenance procedures. If the University chooses to provide its own source of maintenance workers (i.e., students working with faculty or staff), a private maintenance contractor may not be required. • Irrigation: An adequate water level must be maintained at Least during the late winter through early summer to suppress the growth of cattails in the deeper portions of the open water area. The Marsh Steward will be responsible for scheduling water distribution to the site. • Weeding: Weeds species are not expected to be a problem within the mitigation site; however, the likelihood of weed infestation around the perimeter of the site within the willow and mulefat plantings is high. Weeds from this area should be cleared from the mitigation area on a weekly basis during the first six months following installation and at a lesser rate thereafter as determined by the extent of the weed problem. Herbicides should be used only when mechanical (hand tools) methods prove inadequate. If herbicides are judged to be necessary then they should be used in accordance with the manufacturers directions and the Marsh Steward should develop an application program which does not harm the desired native plant species. 6Bretz, Bill, Reserve Steward. 1993. Personal Communication, February 24, 1993. Page 7 • Plant Replacement: Any reseeding necessary to improve sparsely covered areas will be conducted following the same procedures described above. The Marsh Steward must be consulted to determine the proper seeding rates, site preparation and timing. • Pruning and Staking: Pruning and staking of trees and shrubs is not necessary. Dead wood should remain where it has fallen, it plays an important role in habitat creation and in soil formation. • Pest Control: Plants should be monitored for herbivory and diseases. Biological control of insect pests is preferred and badly damaged plants should be removed to prevent spread of the problem. Monitoring This program is intended to provide continued oversight of the mitigation site after installation is completed. This oversight will accomplish two objectives: 1) provides source of feedback for maintenance crew; and 2) provides information used to evaluate project progress, and adjust project performance standards. This information will be relayed to CDFG , the Corps and the Coastal Commission annually, as described below. The performance standards detailed below are based on examination of emergent marsh elsewhere within the Reserve. The five-year goal is 80% vegetative coverage with native emergent species within the non -open water area of the mitigation site. A successful project is one that is composed of at least the same percentage of Scfrpus species as other marsh found within the Reserve and is relatively free of non-native weed species. Surveys of wildlife use of the mitigation site will also be included in the monitoring program; however, no performance standard will be established for wildlife use and this portion of the monitoring will not be used to evaluate project success by the resource agencies. The faunal data gathered will nevertheless be included in the annual monitoring reports submitted to the permitting agencies. Hoag Hospital will provide funding for field data collection and the writing of annual monitoring reports required by the permitting agencies. Monitoring may extend for a period of time deemed necessary by the permitting resource agencies (Corps and Coastal Commission) and following agency notification of project completion the monitoring funding will be terminated. Monitoring will be supervised by the Marsh Steward or a qualified biologist or horticulturalist with experience in native habitat restoration. This role may be filled by University faculty or staff. Monitoring for this mitigation plan will occur in the following manner: Recording of the initial planting effort: Careful records will be made of the species, quantities, and locations of all vegetation, as well as methods used. Any significant problems encountered, such as site conditions unsuitable for planting, will be recorded. A photographic record of the site will be kept from the time of the initial planting, through the end of the monitoring program. After initial planting, the area will be checked monthly by the project monitor for the first 12 months and quarterly thereafter. During these monthly and quarterly checks, any unsuccessful plantings shall Page 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 be replaced as needed to bring the mitigation area into overall compliance with the minimum success standards. Records will be kept of mortality and other problems, such as insect damage. Other potential site problems, such as weed infestation and soil loss, should also be identified by the project monitor. Remedial measures addressing these problems will be designed by the project monitor, submitted to the University and Hoag Hospital, and implemented by the maintenance crew. Any remedial measures undertaken should be reported to CDFG, the Corps and Coastal Commission (Permitting Agencies) and referenced later in the required annual reports. First -year Monitoring Success Standard: 30-percent coverage of non -open water area by target plantings. One year after planting, a report, including all data and photographs taken during the preceding 12 months, will be submitted to the Permitting Agencies. The report will map the vegetation by type and will recommend steps to ensure that 50-percent coverage by target plant species will be achieved within the mitigation area by the end of the following year. Second -year Monitoring Success Standard: 50-percent coverage of non -open water area by target plantings Two years after planting, a second, similar report will be submitted to the Permitting Agencies. This second report will list steps required to ensure that approximately 70-percent coverage will be achieved in the mitigation area by the end of the third year. Third -year Monitoring Success Standard: 70-percent coverage of non -open water area by target plantings Three years after planting, a third annual report will be submitted to the Permitting Agencies. This report will list steps required to ensure that approximately 80-percent coverage will be achieved in the mitigation area by the end of the fourth year. Fourth -year Monitoring Success Standard: 80-percent coverage of non -open water area by target plantings Four years after planting, a fourth annual report will be submitted to the Permitting Agencies. This report will list steps required to ensure that approximately 80-percent coverage will be achieved in the mitigation area by the end of the fifth year. Fifth -year Monitoring Success Standard: 80-percent coverage of non -open water area by target plantings Five years after planting, a fifth annual report will be submitted to the Permitting Agencies. This document will report either the satisfaction of the performance standards or will list steps required Page 9 to ensure that 80-percent coverage will be achieved in the mitigation area by the end of the sixth year. The permittee recognizes that failure of any portion of the mitigation plan (relative to percent cover by the desired species) may result in the requirement to replace that portion of failed mitigation. At any time prior to the end of the fifth year of monitoring, if the goals and success standards of the fifth year are deemed satisfied by the Permitting Agencies, then the permittee will be released from responsibility for further maintenance and monitoring of the mitigation area. At the conclusion of project monitoring the final report will include data and photographs as in the first four reports and will also include an overall evaluation of the success of the mitigation project. S:0070-1G.MIT Page 10 EXHIBITS SAN JOAQUIN MARSH MITIGATION PLAN Regional Location Map - Hoag Hospital 4 991 Not to some Exhibit 1 T North =I EN INN Boundaries of 20.4-acre Hoag Hospital Expansion Site, Including 1.52-acre Wetland '� , *�3 i - c CoQst Hi _ ` gh-way North SAN JOAQUIN MARSH MITIGATION PLAN Site Location Map - Hoag Hospital GLENN LUKOS ASSOCIATES Exhibit 2 Lower Campus 120.41 Acres Not to Scale Source: Vail Speck Taylor, Inc. Adapted from L.SA Associates, Inc., Hoag Hospital Master Plan DEIR, October, 1991, Hoag Hospital Master Plan (Upper and Lower Campus Development Areas) Mil MN N NM NM — — 1 NEI I COASTAL ZONE BOUNDARY • • • ;� M ram. f. • — eet u �� • ssssss jridAt _ r •1 `• �•NRS .• • • •o'. Carlson y`: ;. • • TIC ' . , f te, ,,- it de, p❑ - r• •: Je , +�. SAN DIEGO Chit a E m U NRS - Natural Reserve System (University of California) TIC - Irvine Company Note: All land north of Campus Drive is Irvine Company, except for IRWD Property. H• NOT TO SCALE PbCle Williams & Associates. Ltd. 11111, C"•uhsn" n livd<Nn9Y Ownership of the San Joaquin Marsh SAN JOAQUIN MARSH MITIGATION PLAN Reserve Ownership and Location of Mitigation Site (Adapted from "San Joaquin Freshwater Marsh Enhancement Plan", 1991) GLENN LUKOS ASSOCIATES EXHIBIT 4 Wetlands Research C. Gary Hyden Associates, Inc. I MN IMO PROPOSED MITIGATION SITE 6.08 ACRES SAN JOAQUIN MARSH MITIGATION PLAN Mitigation Site Location Map (Aerial Photo Date: 11/92; Oblique Angle) GLENN LUKOS ASSOCIATES EXHIBIT 6 Photo 1 - View of mitigation site showing foreground of artichoke thistle, mustard, poison hemlock, and mulefat. 4 CtlloCe Thistle 71,71,140,-43:, • Black Willow r-o" Photo 2 - View of mitigation site showing vegetated levees GLENN LUKOS ASSOCIATES x w SAN JOAQUIN MARSH MITIGATION PLAN Mitigation Site Photos s ✓ FUTURE CONNECTION L_ \ / C TO ADJACENT MARSH MITIGATION SITE BOUNDARY_ ' 4 co.•-.-•,masce�crr -- -'tr,iia-ra • .,:,rmivv,..._-' - -'_ -. -r r I i i ✓• r� ,1 •f ,r Ill a � ell t j/ i'o I �o I �1�� !44.474.1 pijikY.ss� : • 1 r 1.(II, I p 1 t IS - i'��' ' ' `^ FUTURE CONNECTION ' 4, ACREAGES - TYPHA-SCIRPUS MARSH - 4.40 ACRES \ : , TO ADJACENT MARSH : LT OPEN WATER - 1.68 ACRES TOTAL (i j - 6.08 ACRES • : a I!i1liil I,,, titi it. !',• ,,• ,� '°� c ,� , n .�g EXISTING BLACK WILLOW TO REMAIN FEET CO a ° ° ti• WATER SOURCE - IRRIGATION PIPE 0 80 160 GLENN LUKOS ASSOCIATES co X W z z 0 cn m Q Mitigation Site - Conceptual Grading and Planting Plan North APPENDIX A 111.1IEEI.EY • INC‘'/8 • Ill\INE • I.QS ANCELI • IIIVEItS,UY. • MAN NIEGO • MAIM ¥MAN015C0 SAN JCIAQUIN FRESI !WATER MARSH RESERVE RUI(N5 PINON RIPCE EIGSEItI RESERVE DEPARTMENT OF EC U.OGY AND EVOLUTIONARY 111OLCCY SC,:EIOOL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES MANTA ❑Al1IIA11A • MANTA CIIVL IRVINE, C'AUFORNIA 92711 20 April 1993 Dr. Deborah L. Elliot -Fisk, Director University of California Natural Reserve System 300 Lakeside Drive, 6th Floor Oakland, CA 94612-3560 RE: Iloag Hospital Mitigation Project Dear Debby: Several months ago I-ioag Hospital contacted the Officer of Natural Reserves ject (requ edllfortfutureuhospital development)aongaaportion clofs nthe UCNRSitation (ISan Joaquin Freshwater Marsh Reserve. Since then Tim Bradley, Peter Bowler and myself have been involved in discussion and refinement of this mitigation government agenciestatives (USFW9,om CDFC, CoasHostaltal and its Commissioconsultants,, � various o f Engineers, City of Irvine), and our own consultant on Marsh enhancement planning, Dr. Mike Josslyn of Wetlands Research Institute. Last week Peter and I met with the representatives from Hoag Hospital, Mike and Pla nining at UCIcto review the 1pro used Hoag Hospital 5mitigatiEnvironmental all, Director of on plan. Just prior to that meeting I was able to talk briefly with Sat Tamaribuchi of The Irvine Company about the Hoag I-lospital plan, and he Indicated that as he understood it, there did not seem to be any conflict or problem from TIC's,perspectivc. The result of that meeting was the attached conceptual plan, which Tim, Peter and 1 think should be supported by the University. We think that there are several good reasons that the UCNRS should support and encourage approval of this project by the California Department of Fish and Game, the Coastal Commission, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: --the proposed site in the Reserve has been severely altered from Its original wetland condition, and has become a rather upland -type of habitat; the Hoag project would restore this site to Its former permanently flooded wet- land condition, --the Hoag project is designed to implement a portion of the overall Marsh enhancement plan prepared by Phillip Williams & Associates, Ltd.and ' Wetlands Research Institute; the ullh,ri ency, but it can funon Independently n the time when TIC carries out the other parts of the overall plan, --thus project would funetion as a pilot project that wound assist In practical refinement of the larger Marsh Enhancement Plan before its full implemen- tation byTIC, --this proct will provide great opportunities for teaching and research In the areas of restoration and conservation biology, by University involve- ment in the detailed planning stages, during the construction and planting stages, and throughout the foliowup monitoring, --the Hoag project would Include the necessary endowment to assure the long term operation and management of the site as designed; this would establish a valuable precedent for UCNRS involvement In other future mitigation projects, fundraising efforts, and University budget planning. Although we are comfortable with the details of the physical design of this mitigation plan, we would welcome any comments or suggestions from Systemwide. In particular, perhaps you could review the proposed level of funding with Liza Riddle and Jeff Kennedy. Our concept has been that Hoag would provide an endowment that would yield•the necessary interest to provide the estimated $1,000 per acre per year in perpetuity. In summary, the Hoag Hospital conceptual mitigation plan has the full support of us here at UCI, and we are recommending that the UCNIZS provide its support from the Systemwide and/or DNAR level to assist Hoag In obtaining the necessary government approvals. If you have any questions, please call either Tim, Peter, or myself. Sincerely yours, William L. Bretz, Reserve Manager QC Natural Reserve System Altachin enI cc: Liza Riddle, UCNRS Jeff Kennedy, UCNRS UNIVERSITY OP CALIFORNIA, IRVINE III:IIKRI.RY • DAVIS • IItVINE • LOS ANGULES • RIVERSIDE • SAN DILCO • SAN FRANCISCO rV4T.1 d'L ��i SANTA IIAItUAItA • SANIA CIUYL DEPARTMENT OP CCOLOGY AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY SCI IDOL OP BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES April 20, 1993 Dr. Deborah L. Elliot -Fisk Director, Natural Reserve System University of California Olfico of the President 300 Lakeside Dr., 6th Floor Oakland, California 94612-3560 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92717 PAX (714) 725-2181 RE: The Hoag Hospital Mitigation Project in the San Joaquin Freshwater Marsh Reserve Dear Deborah: I wanted to provide you with my review comments of the Hoag Hospital mitigation project In the San Joaquin Freshwater Marsh Reserve. Bill Bretz and I have met with Hoag representatives as well as various agencies about the issue, and it clearly is a proposal that has great merit. Linda Dawes (USFWS) was particularly enthusiastic as it will provide some added habitat for the Pacific Pond Turtle population. The proposed mitigation site Is a former wetland area, as indicated by old aerial photographs showing emergent wetland vegetation, which was blanketed in many feet of sediment during the days of the old dam across San Diego Creek. Since that time It has been one of the higher areas of the basin and is essentially upland In character. The site is dominated by upland weedy specles, though (here are a few isolated wetland indicator taxa present. The proposal follows the Enhancement Plan, however, It Iles outside the any. I can see the be timplemented bwil out mine itigationpprojects such as otheway one proposed partof of dby Hoag, and II is my opinion that 11 Is an exciting opportunity to restore wetland function in a part of the system otherwise predominantly upland. Hoag has also indicated support of any research efforts we might want to impinewement, and mitgation sitthe asritjIncreases in wetland elements. It also can berovides a chance to examine the avian aa way ofnd predicting of use predicting how other components of the Enhancement Plan will serve to benefit wildlife. In summary, this Is a good, project which we should fully support. Without this project I can see no way that wetland condltlons can be restored to this area of the Marsh which Is outside TIC's mitigative responsibilities. Please don't hesitate In contacting me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Peter A. Bowler, Ph.D. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX B Excerpted from: Philip Williams & Associates, Ltd., Wetland Research Associates, Inc. and Hyden Associates, Inc. 1991. "San Joaquin Freshwater Marsh Enhancement Plan". Prepared for the City of Irvine, the California State Coastal Conservancy, and the University of California Natural Reserve System. Pages 69-72. 1� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6.5 WATER MANAGEMENT 6.5.1 ,Selection of Water Sources The primary hydrologic objective of the project is to provide adequate quantities of water to support the habitat distribution summarized in Section 6.2. Adequate drainage must be incorporated into the design to prevent the long-term increase of salinity or the accumulation of urban pollutants. There will be a balance between the quality of the water source and the amount of water that can be used in any particular area of the marsh. The project is designed to be as flexible as possible, and water can be transferred through the marsh as required. The best -quality water will be used in the permanent ponds and riparian areas, since these areas are more susceptible to the buildup of contaminants. For example, if a permanent pond is filled predominantly by dewatering well water, the salinities will concentrate over time due to the loss of water by evaporation. If this process continues for several years, the salinity levels may become detrimental to the natural resources in the pond. The preferred sources of water for each type of habitat are shown in Table 6.1. A water budget for the elements of the restoration plan was calculated for elements of the restoration plan in San Joaquin Marsh, in order to predict the annual availability of water to marsh vegetation and to provide an estimate of the need for water from alternative sources. The water budget is an accounting of •input, output, and changes in storage of water in the San Joaquin Marsh system, and was calculated for one water year (October through September). Potential water input to the marsh includes precipitation (Ip), runoff from upstream areas (Ir), shallow groundwater from IRWD wells (Is), and deep groundwater from one existing and one future well (Id). Output from the system includes evapotranspiration (Et) and overland drainage from the restoration elements (ID). Seepage losses were assumed to be negligible in this first approximation, and were not considered. Toups (1973) estimated that seepage losses may amount to 5 ac-ft per year for the University sector of the marsh. Monthly precipitation, runoff, and evaporation values used in the water budget are reported in Table 6.2. The water budget was calculated for restoration elements including: permanent ponds (4 areas), seasonal ponds (7 areas), marsh (3 areas), pickleweed (1 area), riparian (4 areas), grassland (3 areas), and the existing mitigation area (1 area). The location of the areas are illustrated on Figure 6.1. The areas of each element are listed in Table 6.3. Restored elements account for approximately 410 acres out of the total marsh area of 515 acres. 6.5.2 Assumptions Used in the Water Budget Specific criteria for the permanent ponds require a design depth of 5.0 ft., and an initial depth of 4.0 ft. was assumed at the beginning of the water year. Criteria for the Seasonal Pond require a design depth of 3.0 ft., while an initial depth of 0.0lwas assumed tt. 69 at the beginning of the water year. Initial conditions in other restoration elements were also assumed to be dry at the beginning of the water year. Assumptions relating to potential water sources (input) and output to the restoration elements include the following: 1. Input to the permanent ponds includes precipitation and runoff, while output includes evapotranspiration. Deep groundwater may be added to maintain design volume; 2. Input to seasonal ponds includes precipitation, while output includes evapotranspiration and drainage. Shallow groundwater may be added to maintain design volume; 3. Input to pickleweed areas includes precipitation, while output includes evapotranspiration. Shallow groundwater may be added to maintain design volume; 4. Input to riparian areas includes precipitation, while output includes evapotranspiration. Deep groundwater could be added for irrigation; 5. Input to the grassland areas includes precipitation, while output includes evapotranspiration; and 6. Input to the existing mitigation area includes precipitation, while output includes evapotranspiration. Assumed rates for evapotranspiration, groundwater percolation losses, and pipe leakage losses should be verified by field observation. 6.5.3 Annual Water Requirements Results of the water budget calculations (Appendix E) indicate the volume of water needed on a monthly and annual basis to maintain the restoration design. Volumes reported here are dependent on the assumptions made of initial depth in the restoration elements, and will vary from year to year depending on climatic conditions. The water budget calculation suggests that approximately 256 acre-feet/year of deep groundwater would be needed to maintain the design volume in the Permanent Ponds. Approximately 189 acre-feet/year of shallow groundwater would be needed to maintain the. design volume of the Seasonal Ponds. Approximately 78 acre-feet/year of deep groundwater would be needed for irrigation of riparian areas after the initial planting stage. It is assumed that the variety of grass in the Grassland is drought -resistant and will not need irrigation. Approximately 8 acre-feet/year of shallow groundwater would be needed to maintain a constant water level in the Pickleweed area. 70 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6.5.4 Availability of Deep and Shallow Groundwater Availability of deep and shallow groundwater sources was evaluated to determine if available water is sufficient to maintain the design volumes of the restoration elements. The existing University of California deep groundwater well supplies 300-400 gpm. This yield corresponds to 475 acre-feet/year to 634 acre-feet/year. Another deep groundwater well planned for the San Joaquin Marsh will provide approximately 600 gpm, or 1,040 acre- feet/year (Tettemer, pers. comm., 1991). For permanent ponds and riparian areas, there would be enough water to maintain the design volume on an annual basis using the existing UC well. However, storage would be required prior to initial filling of the ponds after construction unless water is available from the second deep groundwater well. Shallow groundwater is available from IRWD wells adjacent to the San Joaquin Marsh. Approximately 108 acre/feet are available annually, at a constant rate of 9 acre- feet/month. This amount of water would be sufficient during most of the year; however, there would be insufficient water for initial filling to the design volume in the seasonal ponds and the pickleweed area during the month following construction. 6.5.5 Operation of the Marsh The project site has been divided into a series of discrete modules. Each module can be filled or irrigated from either deep groundwater, dewatering well water, urban runoff, or tertiary treated effluent. Riparian areas will drain by percolation or by direct runoff into the central drainage channel. Seasonal and permanent ponds have control structures at the outlet into the central drainage channel. The inflow and outlet points to these ponds are located on opposite sides of the pond to enhance flushing of the entire pond in the event of a buildup of contaminants. The inflow and outflow locations for each pond are detailed in Figure 6.1. Distribution of Water in the Marsh The water distribution within the marsh is shown in Figure 6.1. The pipe distribution system can convey deep well water, reclaimed water, or shallow dewatering well water to any of the outlets shown. Stormwater runoff flows down to the retention pond, which regulates the rate of flow through the treatment ponds (Section 6.3.3). The stormwater runoff can be passed down the central drain to the permanent ponds or into San Diego Creek. Drainage of the Project Area Water can be discharged from the central drain into San Diego Creek through the culvert in the south end of the marsh. The bed elevation of San Diego Creek varies depending on the volume of sediment deposited since the previous channel dredging. 71 Typical variations are from ft. to ft. NGVD. Gravity drainage will occur only during low water surface elevations in San Diego Creek and very high pond elevations in the study area. The central drain or permanent ponds can only be drained by pumps. TIC has proposed a trailer -mounted pump that can be driven to the outlet during periods of flushing and stored undercover during winter months. The capacity of the pump is recommended to be cfs, which would drain the largest permanent pond in days or the seasonal ponds in __ days. This potential rate is satisfactory, since a rapid lowering of the water surface elevation could cause seepage failure of the banks of the central drain or permanent ponds. It is probably unnecessary to drain the permanent ponds completely on a regular basis. If salinity becomes a problem in a permanent pond, the salinity levels can be reduced by approximately 50% if half of the water is drained and refilled with high -quality deep well water. A rotation for flushing will be developed whereby water quality testing will determine the quantity of water to be replaced in permanent pond 1. In subsequent years, permanent ponds 2, 3, and 4 will be flushed. In intervening years, soil testing taken as part of the monitoring program may require leaching of some of the riparian areas, as evidenced by the existing high salinity levels in the north central part of the project site. Assuming flushing would not be undertaken in dry years, the permanent ponds can be expected to be flushed every 6-10 years if the Marsh Manager determines it to be necessary. Seasonal ponds would be drained every year and the water passed through the central drain and into San Diego Creek. Seasonal ponds S1-S4 can be filled independently but are interconnected, and all drain through S4. Seasonal ponds S5-S7 can be filled and drained separately. Appendix E shows that riparian areas would drain by percolation to the shallow groundwater or as runoff into the central drain. Adequate drainage and irrigation during a planting program should be provided to prevent ponding of water for long periods. 6.6 PUBLIC ACCESS FACTORS 6.6.1 Pesign Concept The preservation and enhancement of the San Joaquin Marsh is a necessity for many obvious ecological, cultural, and aesthetic reasons. Developing an access and recreation element of the enhancement plan that turns the potential for marsh degradation into an advantage for preservation is an essential component of a successful plan. The recreation design for this project is built around the concept that education is one of the best tools for controlling the impact of human access and recreation on a sensitive site such as the San Joaquin Marsh. Once people understand the importance and fragility of the marsh, most will use the access properly and will also take an active role in preventing others from misusing the facilities. 72 TABLE. 6.1: PRIORITIES FOR SELECTING WATER SOURCES Habitat Permanent Pond Seasonal Ponds Riparian Grassland Pickleweed Cost of Water /Ac-Ft. Direct Pre- cipitation 1 1 1 1 1 0 Deep Well Water 3 E E $40 -I- Pumping Cost Water Source •Derratering 'Well Water D 2 Puttying* Costs • Urban Runoff 2 E E 0 Tertiary Treated Effluent 4 3 1. First source of water; remaining water requirement to be mad up from other sources 2. Second choice of water source 3. Third choice of water source 4. Fourth choice of water source D. Water source in drought conditions only E. Water source to be used in establishing enhancement arpas When available, Dcwatering Well Water will come at no cost to the University or Reserve. (Table 6.1 has been adopted from the "San Joaquin Freshwater Marsh Habitat. Enhancement Plan", 1991 to reflect this change) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 TABLE 6.2: • MONTILLY PRECIPITATION,Tills SAN OAFF AND EVAPORATION VALUES IN Month (Et) Precipitation (Ip) (Acre -Feet) Runoff (Ir) (Acre -Feet) Evapotranspiration (Acre -Feet) October 6 0 37 November 11 0 37 December 24 10 27 January 28 28 23 11 4 13 12 10 0 0 26 42 40 65 72 February March April May June 1 0 93 July 0 0 57 August 0 0 43 September 0 0 55 Yearly Total 136 45 594 1 1 TABLE 6.3: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 AREAS OF ELEMENTS OF 'DIE RESTORATION PLAN Restoration Element Area (Acres) Permanent Ponds P1 37 P2 22 P3 49 P4 32 Seasonal Ponds S1 3.5 S2 3.5 S3 3.5 S4 1.1 S5 12.0 S6 12.0 S7 12.0 Marsh M1 59.0 M2 53.0 M3 33.0 Pickleweed 8.9 Riparian R1 6.9 R2 38.0 R3 0.4 R4 42.0 Grassland G1 10.0 G2 33.0 G3 2.5 Existing Mitigation Area 16.7 Semi -Permanent Stream Habitat 10.0 TOTAL (Acres): 491 • V OF NFUMPORT READ AM DEC 1 44 1993 PM 718I9110111,1211 j218j41516 4 HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN 301 NEWPORT BOULEVARD • BOX Y • NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92658-8912 • PHONE (714) 645-8600 December 13, 1993 Ms. Patti Temple Planning Department City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 Dear Patti: Based on the delay in receiving Coastal Commission legal counsel comments on the hospital's requested clarifications on the Development Agreement amendments, the hospital has no objections to continuing this item to the next City Council meeting. Sincerely, Michael D. Stephens President MDS:sas A NON-PROFIT COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ACCREDITED BY THE JOINT COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF HOSPITALS • �". td' 445 r o� FRIENDS OF CAT -TAIL COVE 2221 East 16th Street Newport Beach, CA 92663 (714) 548-6326 May 8, 1992 Mayor Phil Sansone and City Council Members 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach CA 92663 PLANNING DEPARTMEN1 t1TY OF NEWPORT BEACH MAY 8 1992 AM PM 71819110111112111213141516 4 Dear Mayor Sansone and City Council Members: Re: Possible Conditions for Inclusion in the Hoag Hospital Master Plan Development Agreement We offer our suggestions regarding the Hoag Hospital wetlands we know as Cat -Tail Cove, on the Lower Campus: 1. Project shall be designed so that Lower Campus Phase I buildings would be sited in Zones C, D, E, F, and G only. Any wetlands removed in this phase should be mitigated onsite in Zones A and B at a 1:1 ratio. 2. Any coastal sage scrub removed during Phase I shall be replaced on the bluff in Zones A and B, consistent with efforts to protect potential habitat for the gnatcatcher. 3. Initial mass grading shall avoid impacting the wetlands by means of protective fencing. Any fill in the wetlands shall be prevented during that mass grading. 4. Total wetlands on the Lower Campus is 2.59 acres. Offsite replacement shall be at a minimum of 1:5 x 2.59 = 3.90 acres, unless otherwise permitted by the resource agencies. 5. Retention of the wetlands at the western end of the Lower campus shall be considered by Council as an earthquake mitigation measure, since test borings by M. E. Wright show probable location of the fault at 30 feet below the surface at this site. See Appendix I, Volume III, DEIR, Crandall boring 95, p. 8, of Merrill Wright report. 6. Mitigation sites should also be evaluated, including the CalTrans West site, as a possible mitigation for the wetlands. 7. Prior to removal of the wetlands at the Hoag Lower Campus, existing fauna -- including all amphibians and fish as well as animals such as rabbits, squirrels, mice, opossums, and raccoons -- shall be removed to the new wetlands site pending approval of the resource agencies. Such removal shall be accomplished either 8 • May 8, 1992 Mayor Sansone and City Council Members FCTC Suggestions Re: HHMPDA on Wetlands, p. 2 before or after normal reproductive cycles in which young are born and reared in nests, for example, in Fall. 8. If possible, portions of wetlands -- including vegetation -- should be removed to the new wetlands site prior to grading in order that the creatures have appropriate cover and forage areas. 9. The Development Agreement should be limited to completion of the first phase of eight years, and all wetlands mitigation should be in place and functioning during Phase I. 10. We agree with the Homeowners of Villa Balboa letter (to Mayor Sansone dated April 22, 1992, signed by Bill Jennings) regarding their Item No. 7: "Incorporate into landscape architectural plan for the Lower Campus the retention of 1.52 acres of consolidated sensitive wetlands community at the western end of the Lower Campus, including restoration of the coastal bluff above the consolidated wetland." We agree with all other comments of the Homeowners of Villa Balboa letter of April 22, 1992. Very truly yours, / U4 >,9 Jan D. Vandersloot, M.D. and Jo An D. Burns for the Friends of Cat -Tail Cove A HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN 301 NEWPORT BOULEVARD • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92658-6100 • PHONE (714) 645-8600 11� D. Form and content of AGENDA I-IOAG MASTER PLAN March 24, 1994 I. Project Status A Cardiac Services Addition B. Mass Grading Plan ittildiank_fietfaidda) lTii r.Gi 1. Redefinition of mass grading project 2. Establishment of grade C. Outpatient Services Building II. Mitigation Monitoring Program Procedures A Submittal of information on specific projects B. Submittal of information for one-time studies RAer9 C. Review/comment/revision process once information is submitted I gee 11 itorin 1. Project specific (notebooks) 2. Annual (letter) III. South Coast Air Quality Management District A Strategy to address mitigation measur B. Meeting setup 2!4t aid File: 1250.16 a/lith *slap v �iicaz�ed Crl"cdct A NON-PROFIT COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ACCREDITED BY THE JOINT COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF HOSPITALS 36. HOAG MASTER PLAN FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT MITIGATION MEASURES RELATED TO SCAQMD Prior to issuance of grading and building permits for each phase of development, the Project Sponsor shall provide evidence for verification by the Planning Department that the necessary permits have been obtained from the SCAQMD for regulated commercial equipment incorporated within each phase. An alr quality analysis shall be conducted prior to each phase of development for the proposed mechanical equipment contained within that phase that identifies additional criteria pollutant emissions generated by the mechanical equipment to be installed in that phase. If the new emissions, when added to existing project emissions could result in impacts not previously considered or significantly change the land use impact, appropriate CEQA documentation shall be prepared prior to issuance of any permits for that phase of development. Each subsequent air quality analysis shall be reviewed and approved by the SCAQMD. 64. Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, the Project Sponsor shall evaluate all existing vent systems located on the lower campus and submit this data to the City Building and Fire Departments, the State Department of Conservation, Division of Oil and Gas, and the Southern California Air Quality Management District for comment. Additionally, any proposed new passive vents shall be evaluated by these agencies prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. If the vents are emitting detectable levels of hydrogen sulfide and/or toxins, the emitted gases must be treated prior to discharge in a manner acceptable to these agencies. 65. If required by the Southern California Air Quality Air Management District, an ?Jr dispersion model shall be required in order to predict the cumulative effects of the emissions. Compliance with any additional requirements of the AQMD shall be verified through a compliance review by the w�ltt distric�Ikn,,w�� ritten verification received by the Newporj4each By�ilding Department. Z2 M. BOO (Nj,. JUL6 O ,s0 77. As required by the Distri.�, the UPro(ect Sponsor shall develop a sampling and rnn�rvrc analysis protocol for District approval to evaluate the impact the existing and post -scrubber emissions will have on the ambient air quality and on possible receptor populations. The required evaluation shall include analysis for criteria and toxic pollutants, and an evaluation of the potential risks associated with the emission of these pollutants (Rule 1401). Included in the plans for the design o �n o „n0_ the scrubber system should be a make-up gas source. �K �t� ) 0, emit FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PAGE 2 MITIGATION MEASURES RELATED TO SCAQMD The Project Sponsor shall submit plans to the City of Newport Beach Building Department that demonstrate that the flare operation will be shut down within four years of Auqust, 1992. The project sponsor must prepare and obtain approval from the SCAQMD to implement a sampling and analysis protocol for evaluation of the existing emissions from the flare after scrubbing (Mitigation Measures 75 & 76), and the effect of flare shutdown on ambient air quality. The methane gas source should be used, if engineering design allows, as a supplemental source of fuel for the Hos ital's boiler . if the gas is not usable, the flare shall be relocated. � , ; `6--- s AAA -eat ,3 /� % "7/ f 81. Prior to installation of the scrubber system, the Project Sponsor shall develop a protocol for a study to evaluate the integrity of the control equipment and piping. The Project Sponsor must obtain agreement from the District on the protocol prior to initiating the study. File: 1250.16.74.50 FIN.EIR.MIT.MEAS HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN 301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX Y • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-8912 MEMORANDUM Date: August 5, 1992 To: Patricia Temple Advanced Planning Manager City of Newport Beach Advanced Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, California 92658-8915 From: F. W. Evins Vice President Facilities Design & bonstruction Subject: Hoag Hospital Master Plan Regarding: Mitigation Measures Monitoring Summary Table Comments: Pursuant to my letter to you dated April 29, 1992 (attached), regarding the compilation of a Mitigation Monitoring Summary Plan, please receive the attached draft document dated August 5, 1992. Because of the comprehensive, complex, and cumbersome nature of the 123 mitigation measures, I have attempted to streamline this document by abbreviating and condensing the approval and monitoring/conformance checkpoints. Please review this initial draft document and get back to me with your comments. Contact me at 760-5908 if you have any questions. FWE: bw c: Pete Foulke Attachment: Hoag letter dated April 29, 1992 Mitigation Summary Table File: 16-33.30-Mit.Table .,• ) HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTER/AN 301 NEWPORT BOULEVARD • BOX Y • NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92658.8912 • PHONE (714) 645-8600 April 29, 1992 Patricia Temple Principal Planner City of Newport Beach Advanced Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, California 92658-8915 Subject: Master Plan Mitigation Measures Dear Patricia: As you know, mitigation monitoring for the Hoag Master Plan EIR is required pursuant to AB 3180. The majority of the mitigation measures are presently in a format that will assure their implementation, as required, and monitoring, if needed. The conditions of approval for the Master Plan and the Development Agreement, however, are not currently written in a similar format. As we have discussed, due to the complexity of the project, it is imperative that Hoag and the City have a clear interpretation of all conditions of approval and mitigation measures for the Master Plan. Therefore, we would suggest that once the project has been acted upon by the City Council, we jointly prepare a manual of parts that identifies the following for each condition of approval and mitigation measure: The point in the development process by which a condition of approval or mitigation measure is to be accomplished. This milestone should be directly tied to a City discretionary action, e.g., building permit, grading permit, etc., or to a routine inspection process that occurs during grading and/or construction. The City department(s) who are responsible for verifying that the mitigation measure or condition of approval has, in fact, been accomplished. A concrete product which is to act as the standard by which to determine whether or not a mitigation measure or condition of approval has been fulfilled, e.g., a report, letter, permit from another agency, etc. A NON-PROFIT COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ACCREDITED BY THE JOINT COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF HOSPITALS ,: Letter to Ms. Temple Master Plan Conditions Monitoring Page 2 Because the conditions of approval, as they are currently worded, have been recommended by the Planning Commission for adoption by the City Council, it is my preference that this conditions compliance/ mitigation monitoring manual be prepared after a decision has been made on the Hoag Master Plan by the City Council, and that this manual be received by the Planning Commission for their input on the format and content of the manual. Please let me know your thoughts on this. Sincere W. Evins, III, AIA Vice President FWE:bw c: Pete Foulke Peri Muretta File: 16-33.00-MP Cond./Mit. Monitor. 411, r-tar .trTLl rAT-r+-cptg-,i.icSic. cc( .4c1%4- zo in Amenotisec HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN 8/05/92 PRELIMINARY DRAFT MITIGATION MEASURES MONITORING SUMMARY TABLE Mitigation lksicription Hoag Location Threshold/ Approval/ Verification Measure # Consultant Upper Campus Permit Monitor Dept. Form Lower Campus Schedule CtA - c.eK-a1r44- R_vrc t3S 1. `t City Grading Standards Civil Engineer UC/LC . Grading • Building Bldg. -Dept. 2. - t.f' Cut Slope Monitoring Geo/Soils LC _ Grading Building Bldg. Dept. 3:MML fJ Safe Grading/Faults Geo/Soils LC Grading Building Bldg. Dept. 4. 'se Seismic Building Standards UBC Architecture UC/LC Building Building Bldg. Dept. 5. µ LRC Geo Report 6/89 Geo/Soils Architect LC Grading Building Building Bldg. Dept. ri{ Soil Corrosivity Tests Geo/Soils LC Grading Building Bldq. Dept. 7. ty Soils Corrosivity Construction Compatibility Geo/Soils Architect LC Building Building Bldg. Dept. 8. 14 Corrosivity Neutralization Geo/Soils LC Building Building Bldg. Dept. 9. 7 Silt, Dust, Runoff Civil Engineer Landscape LC Building Building Bldg. Dept. 10,,./ i 11 — Landscape Plan Landscape Architect Grading PBR/ Planning 11. 14 Routine Vacuuming N/A OC Water MP County Planning 12. 1 J Hydrologic Analysis Geo/Sails Civil Engineer LC Grading/ Building Building %GCB Bldg. Dept. 13. )j Groundwater Analysis Deviaterfng and Subdrains Geo/Soils Civil Engineer LC Grading/ Building Building Bldg. Dept. 14. H. Dewatering Permits and Discharge Permits Geo/Soils Civil Engineer LC Grading/ Building 1hCOB NPDES WCCB Bldq. Dept. 15. si Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Infection Control FD&C Engineering LC/UC N/A N/A N/A 16. NE Wetlands Agencies Review Requirements Wetland Biologist LC Big Canyon Wetland Mitigation Permits PCCE 02C F&G F&W City City CC 17. N Wetlands Mitigation Plan Agencies Jurisdiction Wetland Biologists LC Big Canyon Wetland Mitigation Permits AXE F&G F&W City City 18. Final Wetland Mitigation Plan Wetland Biologists LC Big Canyon Grading/WL Mitigation Permits AOCE Ox F&G F&W City CC 0 \V\ 4. Mitigation Measure # Description Hoag Consultant Location Upper Campus Lower Campus Threshold/ Approval/ Permit Monitor Schedule Dept. Verification Form City 19. to Wetland Mitigation Plan Provisions/Monitoring Wetland Biologist Big Canyon Grading/WL Mitigation Permits AVE Ct7C F&G F&W CD; 20. u Final Wetland Mitigation Plan Requirements Grading, Plant Lists, Monitoring Programs Wetland Biologist Big Canyon Wetland Mitigation Permit P(F O7C City F&G F&W CCC City 29 j.( Archeologist Monitoring of Mass Grading Architect Paleontologist LC Grading Building Bldg. Dept. 9• P 22.) L a Paleontologist Monitoring of Mass Grading Architect Paleontologist IC Grading Building Bldg. Dept. 23. ij Fence Alon9 Villa, Common Property Line c..� N/A l� N/A City Engineering Bldg. Dept. 24. -( "---' MP Project Approvals & Documents MP/PC Text/EIR/Grading Permits/Building Permits Varies UC/LC Grading Permit Varies Ongoing 25. N Phase I - Subsequent Studies _ TPO Volume Analysis Phases I & III ) To Be Determined UC/CC End of Phase I City Planning/ Traffic Dept. City Planning & Traffic 26. y ZEOflo.t r Prior to Phase I Traffic - Trip Generation - Not to Exceed 1338 PM Peak Hour To Be Determined UC/LC Prior to Phase I/ Grading City Planning/ Traffic City 27. 14 After Phase I Trip Generation for Phases II & III To Be Determined UC/LC Grading Phase II City Traffic Planning Dept. City 28. Future AQMD Regulations Varies UC/LC Ongoing ;CND FOND City 29. �City Transportation Demand Management Ordinance O.C. Congestion Management To Be Determined LC Ongoing City/County / City/ Y County 30.1 N Public Transit Bus Stops NA UC/LC Ongoing City Traffic OCTD/City 3.4i i<- I`p' Westside Roadway Traffic Control - Pilot Program Traffic LC Grading Planning Planning 32. 1„r4 Traffic Generated Parking Rates Subsequent to Phase I Traffic UC/LC Co Phase set on Tanning Traffic 33. N Internal Roadways Circulation Civil Engineer UC/LC Grading Public Works/ Traffic 34. u Intersection Improvements Civil Engineer Traffic UC/LC Grading Traffic Engineer City Traffic Engineer . H Hospital Road/Placentia Avenue 35. 1.4 Employee Rideshare/Trip Reduction AQMD ReqXV Transportation Coordinator N/A N/A Transportation Coordinator Transport., Coordinator (fa'4-(. 56/CVicE A DD//a9 0 Mitigation Measure # Description I-loeg Consultant Location Upper Campus Lower Campus Threshold/ Permit Schedule Approval/ Monitor Dept. Verification Form 36z &j `,pt Regulated air emissions equipment permits through POW _S p1i.--c a.ad {1 •ttIL-•r ,--S Mech. Engin. Architect UC/LC Grading/ Building Planning ACfvO Planning %OMO _ 3�3. Energy efficient lighting incorporated into design Elec. Engineer UC/LC Grading/ Building Planning Planning 38. 7 •• Ordinance #91-16-5% Carpool Parking Bike Lockers, Rideshare Information Itrt-td"..sy. Planning Coordinator UC/LC Grading/ Building Planning Traffic Eng. Planning Traffic Eng. 39. )4 Noise Levels 65 CNEL at On -Site Outdoor Hospital Areas Mech. Eng. Architect Traffic Engin. UC/LC N/A N/A N/A 40. sti Interior Noise Levels, 45 CNEL Below Architect Mech. Engin. UC/LC N/A N/A N/A 41. v Existing Exhaust Fan - New building are mitigated re: noise levels. Architect/ Acoustical Mech. Eng. UC/LC Grading/ Building Planning Planning , 4'27 , t City to send letter to emergency vehicle company to cut off sirens. Paramedic Coordinator N/A N/A N/A N/A ,,.,.., ( 43 ,1 -.( L=� �!' •� Landscape and irrigation plans to be developed for each building/project by licensed landscape architect. Landscape Architect UC/LC Grading/ Building Planning/ PBR/ Public Works Building Dept. 44. j r..( e. Lighting and window systems for wsstside of UCper Architect Elec. Engin. l.0 Building Building Building Campus to minimize light spillage 45.) �� s`' Mechanical and trash screen from public view Architect UC/LC Building Planning/ Building Planning/ Building 46.) I No major mechanical equipment on LC rooftops - Conceal and screen Architect Mech. Eng. LC Building ' Planning/ Building Planning/ Building )i" hei �r - Linear Park - Dedicate grade and improve. Civil Eng. Landscape Architect LC Building/ Grading Planning PBR, PW Building Building PBR 48. 14 • EIR Conformance - View impacts verified for each L C building •' Model Maker LC Building Planning Planning 49. Af Hazardous materials/waste management laforyiot Wang (Hosp.) Eng. LC N/A N/A State Agencies 50. /t,/ Reabandonment of oil wells Gas LC Building Building/D.O.G Building/ D.O.G. 51. Ai Collection of gas samples at Newport Beach Townhomes Gas LC Grading Building Building . L52. / 4/ Soil gas sampling and monitoring program as LC Grading Building Building' OP. CCA,ei /A6 S. jr/GAS ,4DD/V/D/✓ Page 3 Mitigation Description Ibag Location Threshold/ Approval/ Verification Measure # Consultant Upper Campus Permit Monitor Dept. Form Lower Campus Schedule 53. , Ai tit, i Site safety plan as LC Grading Building Building Building 54. A/ Gas collection wells drilled as LC Grading Building Building Building 55. N Monitoring system Gss LC Grading Building Building Building 5'6.. 'r_� .V Study of other hazardous constituents Geo/Soils LC Grading Building Building 57. nl_ N Study of wells and flare Geo/Soils LC Grading Building 513-.6k V Scrubber system Scrubber LC Grading Building 59. iS/ Evaluation of flare system Scrubber LC Grading Building Building 60..CY.: .1/ Relight system in flare Scrubber LC Grading Building 61. ' N Gas monitor Scrubber LC Grading Building 62. A/ / Stormwater pollution prevention plan Civil Engineer UC/LC Grading Building Engineering Ry1K1Ce '63. N Soils samples for BTEX Geo/Soils LC Grading Building .` 64. /de Evaluate existing vent systems Ga; LC Grading Building Fire D.O.C. ACM ;as. ; Air dispersion model Engineer UC/LC Grading Building Building Planning PCSVO 66. N Gas monitoring equipment Remediation LC Building Building 67. ,S/ Trench and monitor inferred fault Geo/ Soils/ Cis LC Grading Building 68. ,../ Structures designed for gas seepage protection Geotechnical Engineer Building Building Building 69. A, Plans sharing gas test borings for buildings as LC Grading Building 70. .i/ Passive gas collection systems Geotech/ Architect LC Building Grading Engineer 71. 4/ Plans sharing sealing from gas mitigation Geotech/ Architect LC Building Grading Engineer 72. ,t/ Plans sharing Gas gas sensors Engineer LC Building Building Fire 73. N Plans for gas accumulation in storage areas Mech. Eng. LC Building Building G�,ez/A-G 5eie v/c.- ADD/7 m) Nab.. Page 4 — Mitigation Measure # Description Fbag Consultant Location Upper Campus Lower Campus Threshold/ Permit Schedule Approval/ Monitor Dept. Verification Form 74. A/ Utilize explosimeter Meth. Eng. LC During Construction Fire • 75.o,n/ Monitoring during flare removal Gas LC During Construction Building 7.,,f O ,i/ Scrubber system to remove H2S Remediation LC Grading Building Planning ADND Remediation Geo/Soils LC Prior to Scrubber Installation Building Planning AQMD t7. iv Sampling and analysis protocol 7.8!idAd. Oh\ Calibration and maintenance plan for scrubber equipment Remediation LC Prior to Scrubber Installation Building Planning AavD 79. , / Sampling and analysis protocol Remediation LC Prior to Scrubber Installation Building Planning AQtvD 80. N Calibration and maintenance plan for scrubber equipment Remediation LC Prior to Scrubber Installation Building Planning PQND SY ,<r% Study to evaluate control equipment Remediation LC Prior to Scrubber Installation Building Planning AQMD 82. 7 • District Rules #402 Public Nuisance 403 Fugitive Dust Civil Engineer Architect UC/LC Building Building Building 83.y , ,V u'J Hazardous Materials/ Waste Management Infection Waste (Hosp.) Engin. LC/UC Building Fire Preven. CO -CA Verify Plans 84., ,c/ Hazardous Materials/ Waste Management Infection Waste (Hosp.) Eng. LC/UC Building Fire Prevent. OCFCA Verify Plans 85.d, ,t/ Waste Management/Storage Hazardous Materials for Expanded Facilities (Hosp.) LC/UC Ongoing Fire Prevent. OO-CA Verify Plans 86.4; ,,,/ 77 z,6 li-i Air Toxic Rules--1401, 1403, 1405, 1415 AQMD are being carried out. (Hosp.) UC/LC Ongoing Planning ACIVD Hoag Letter to Planning Director 87. Al Paved roadways done early in project - Phase I mass grading and paving Civil Engineer LC Phase I Building Hoag letter to Planning Director 88. IY Energy Efficient Building Systems Architect/ Engineers UC/LC Ongoing Building Building Plans 89. : / Employment of methods/materials where feasible to minimize VOC emissions (Hosp.) LC Ongoing ff1, /. Ses&r ',c AffiZ / l7 A/ Page 5 Mitigation Measure # Description Hoag Consultant Location Upper Campus Lower Campus Threshold/ Permit Schedule Approval/ Monitor Dept. Verification Form 90.,.r g 'seAddition Overhead power lines at Critical Care/Surgery Architect Elec. Engin. Edison LCCCSAConst Public Works CCSAPlans 91. Y, Emergency fire access Civil Engineer UC/LC Grading Fire Dept. Public Works Phase I Civil Plans 92. Water saving devices and fixtures Mech. Engineer UC/LC Building Building Dept. Bldg. Plans 93. be Water and sewer facilities Master Plan - Verity adequacy of existing facilities Civil Engineer UC/LC Grading Public Works Building Phase I Civil Plans 94. .f Fire sUCpression/sprinkler systems for all buildings Mech. Engineer UC/LC Building Fire Dept. Building Plans 95.!it/ Access Roads - Existing and new to become fire lanes Civil Engineer UC/LC Building Fire Dept. Phase 1 Civil Plans 96. yes Thermal Integrity - New buildings' time clocks, sensors & construction measures Architect Mech. Engin. UC/LC Building Building Dept. Architect. Plans 97. ,r Window glazing, insulation & efficient ventilation in new building Architect Mech. Engin. UC/LC Building Building Architect. Bldg. Plans 98. se Y Energy efficient building appliances Water heaters, furnaces & boilers Architect Mech. Engin. UC/LC Building Building Architect. Bldg. Plans 99. `C Solar Designs and solar heating Architect Mech. Engin. UC/LC Building Building Architect. Bldg. Plans J.00.1 Y Nt Soils disposal into environmentally cleared landfill Geo/Soils Civil UC/LC Grading Building Grading Phase I 101 .,' y 1 Construction traffic phasing Contractor UC/LC Grading City Traffic Engineer Grading Doc./Permit 102. 7• • Haul routes for export material Chapter 15 NBM Code Contractor UC/LC Grading City Traffic Grading Doc./Permit 103.7 r • Public traffic dis Jr3Ction Contractor UC/LC Grading City Traffic Grading Doc./Permit 104. -y Truck trip limits - 16 per hour from June 1 to Sept. 1 Contractor UC/LC Grading/ Building Public Works Grading Doc./Permit 105. .,( , Trucks will utilize covers to minimize material loss in transit. Contractor UC/LC Grading/ Building Public Works Grading Doc./Permit 106. Y Grading will be done in according with Grading Ordinance re: dust, erosion, noise. Civil Engineer Contractor UC/LC Grading Public Works Grading Doc./Permit 107. y% Grading to comply with AQMD Rules and Regulations Civil Engin. Contractor UC/LC Grading Public Works Grading Doc./Permit 108. , • ,43/4.4a Construction crew trip reduction plan for Contractors. Identify plan measures. Architect Contractor Civil Engin. UC/LC Grading/ Building Traffic Engineer Contractor Verification cM'CD/A C ,CVic 5 A,Z 1-77&V Page 6 .+ l Mitigation Measure # Description Fba9 Consultant Location Upper Campus Lower Campus Threshold/ Permit Schedule Approval/ Monitor Dept. Verification Form 109. Al Stationary emissions factors for equipment used during construction utilizing SCAQMD Handbook ��it—o t� u f Architect Contractor UC/LC Grading Planning Dept. Contractor Plans/ Contract 110. Y Low sulfur fuels to 0veritied for use in stationary equipment Architect Contractor UC/LC Grading/ Building Planning Dept. Contractor Plans/ Contract 111. Y Mufflers will be maintained on all engines and kept in Architect Contractor UC/LC Ongoing Planning Dept. Contractor Verification _ 12._ ► •t. Construction Activities - Hours of oiler on as Architect -"Ciontractor UC/LC ,JJ/"- c !eat. Ongoing Building Dept. Contractor 118. n $250,000 for streetfront improvements on Newport B E.R. Addition - Rooftop screening of mechanical Architect UC/LC ER. Construction Building Dept. Architect Verification 115. N i E.R. Addition - Mechanical equipment not to exceed 55 dBA at property line Architect UC/LC ER. Construction Building Dept. Architect Mech. Eng. Verification ( 146, --' Hoag to pay 75% of 24 ficus trees along property line (Hoag) W Completed Planning Hoag Completed 11,17. ,4/• 44 Heliport Use - Limited to emergency medical care (Hoag) L✓ Ongoing Planning Hoag Policy 118. ^/ Hoag - Letter from City to OSHPD stating project conformance (Hoag) UC/LC Building Permit Planning City Letter of Verification 119. 4/ Loading Dock Services - non -vehicular activities - trash compactor 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. (Hoag) W Ongoing Planning Hoag Policy .--. ( 120. }' AcousticaVvisual screen at Loading Dock - CCSA acoustical study requirements Architect Landscape Architect W OCSA Permit/CCC Planning CCSA Design 121. 2 CO Hotspot'Qnalysis - Each individual Phase I, II, III Gas UC/LC Grading Planning Gas/Floag )z-y- .Y i 31.-2," ynt t \<. edle1)MC Se/eV/egg /4.07)/770/1 Page 7 HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPz t AL PRESBYTERIAN 8/05/92 PRELIMINARY DRAFT MITIGATION MEASURES MONITORING SUMMARY TABLE Mitigation Description Haag Location Threshold/ Approval/ Verification Measure # Consultant Upper Campus Permit Monitor Dept. Form Lower Campus Schedule 1. City Grading Standards Civil Engineer UC/LC Grading Building Bldq. Dept. 2. Cut Slope Monitoring Geo/Soils LC Grading Building Bldg. Dept. 3. Safe Grading/Faults Geo/Soils LC Grading Building Bldg. Dept. 4. Seismic Building Standards UBC Architecture UC/LC Building Building Bldg. Dept. 5. LRC Geo Report 6/89 Geo/Soils Architect LC Grading Building Building Bldg. Dept. 6. Soil Corrosivity Tests Geo/Soils LC Grading Building Bldq. Dept. 7. Soils Corrosivity Construction Compatibility Geo/Soils Architect LC Building Building . Bldg. Dept. 8. Corrosivity Neutralization Geo/Soils LC Building Building Bldg. Dept. 9. Silt, Dust, Runoff Civil Engineer Landscape LC Building Building . Bldg. Dept. 10. Landscape Plan Landscape Architect Grading PBR/ Planning 1 1. Routine Vacuuming N/A OC Water MP County Planning 12. Hydrologic Analysis Geo/Soils Civil Engineer LC Grading/ Building Building WCCB Bldg. Dept. 13. Groundwater Analysis Dewatering and Subdrains Geo/Soils Civil Engineer LC Grading/ Building Building Bldg. Dept. 14. Dewatering Permits and Discharge Permits Geo/Soils Civil Engineer LC Grading/ Building WOlDB NPDES WC]C8 Bldq. Dept. 15. Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Infection Control FD&C Engineering LC/UC N/A N/A N/A 16. Wetlands Agencies Review Requirements Wetland Biologist IG Big Canyon Wetland Mitigation Permits POLE OD; F&G F&W City City OTC 17. Wetlands Mitigation Plan Agencies Jurisdiction Wetland Biologists LC Big Canyon Wetland Mitigation Permits Prr-F F&G F&W OM City City OM 18. Final Wetland Mitigation Plan Wetland Biologists LC Big Canyon Grading/WL Mitigation Permits POCE CCC F&G F&W City CM \ ‘,,1 - . \ \ „% Mitigation Description Hoag Location Threshold/ Approval/ Verification Measure # Consultant Upper Campus Permit Monitor Dept. Form Lower Campus Schedule 19. Wetland Mitigation Plan Provisions/Monitoring Wetland Biologist Big Canyon Grading/WL Mitigation Permits /OCE CCC F&G F&W City 033 20. Final Wetland Mitigation Plan Requirements Grading, Plant Lists, Monitoring Programs Wetland Biologist Big Canyon Wetland Mitigation Permit KIT Ox City CCC City F&G F&W 21. Archeologist Monitoring of Mass Grading Architect Paleontologist LC Grading Building Bldg. Dept. 22. Paleontologist Monitoring of Mass Grading Architect Paleontologist LC Grading Building . Bldg. Dept. 23. Fence Along Villa Balboa Common Property Line N/A LC N/A City Engineering Bldg. Dept. 24. MP Project Approvals & Documents MP/PC Text/EIR/Grading Permits/Building Permits Varies UC/LC Grading _ Permit Varies - Ongoing 25. Phase I - Subsequent Studies TPO Volume Analysis Phases II & III To Be Determined UC/CC End of Phase I City Planning/ Traffic Dept. City Planning & Traffic 26. Prior to Phase I Traffic - Trip Generation - Not to Exceed 1338 PM Peak Hour To Be Determined UC/LC Prior to Phase I/ Grading City Planning/ Traffic City 27. After Phase I Trip Generation for Phases II & 111 To Be Determined UC/LC Grading Phase II City Traffic Planning Dept. City 28. Future AQMD Regulations Varies UC/LC Ongoing ACivD AQIvD City 29. City Transportation Demand Management Ordinance O.C. Congestion Management To Be Determined LC Ongoing City/County City/ County 30. Public Transit Bus Stops N4 UC/LC Ongoing City Traffic OCTD/City 31. Westside Roadway Traffic Control - Pilot Program Traffic LC Grading Planning Planning 32. Traffic Generated Parking Rates Subsequent to Phase I Traffic UC/LC Phase I Completion Planning Traffic Traffic 33. Internal Roadways Circulation Civil Engineer UC/LC Grading Public Works/ Traffic 34. Intersection Improvements Hospital Road/Placentia Avenue Civil Engineer Traffic UC/LC Grading Traffic Engineer City Traffic Engineer 35. Employee Rideshare/Trip Reduction AQMD Reg. XV Transportation Coordinator N/A N/A Transportation Coordinator Transport. Coordinator • Page 2 Mitigation Measure # Description Hoag Consultant Location tipper Campus Lower Campus Threshold/ Permit Schedule Approval/ Monitor Dept. Verification Form 36. Regulated air emissions equipment permits through MYD Mech. Engin. Architect UC/LC Grading/ Building Planning /CND Planning KW 37. Energy efficient lighting incorporated into design Elec. Engineer UC/LC Grading/ Building Planning Planning 38. $ Ordinance #91-16-5% Carpool Parking Bike Lockers, Rideshare Information Planning Coordinator UC/LC Grading/ Building Planning Traffic Eng. Planning Traffic Eng. 39. Noise Levels 65 CNEL at On -Site Outdoor Hospital Areas Mech. Eng. Architect Traffic Engin. UC/LC N/A N/A N/A 40. Interior Noise Levels, 45 CNEL Below Architect Mech. Engin. UC/LC N/A N/A N/A 41. Existing Exhaust Fan - New building are mitigated re: noise levels. Architect/ Acoustical Mech. Eng. UC/LC Grading/ Building Planning Planning 42. City to send letter to emergency vehicle company to Paramedic Coordinator N/A N/A N/A N/A 43. Landscape and irrigation plans to be developed for each building/project by licensed landscape architect. Landscape Architect UC/LC Grading/ Building Planning/ PBR/ Public Works Building Dept. 44. Lighting and window systems for west side of UCper Campus to minimize tight spillage Architect Elec. Engin. LC Building Building Building 45. Mechanical and trash screen from public view Architect UC/LC Building Planning/ Building Planning/ Building 46. No major mechanical equipment on LC rooftops - Conceal and screen Architect Mech. Eng. LC Building - Planning/ Building Planning/ Building 47. Linear Park - Dedicate grade and improve. Civil Eng. Landscape Architect LC Building/ Grading Planning PBR, PW Building Building PBR 48. EIR Conformance - View impacts verified for each L C building Model Maker LC Building Planning Planning 49. Hazardous materials/waste management Infectious Waste {Hosp.) Eng. LC N/A N/A State Agencies 50. Reabandonment of oil wells GE& LC Building Building/D.O.G Building/ D.O.G. 51. Collection of gas samples at Newport Beach Townhomes Gss LC Grading Building Building . 52. Soil gas sampling and monitoring program Ccs LC Grading Building Building. Page 3 /�� • Mitigation Measure # Description Hoag Consultant Location Upper Campus Lower Campus Threshold/ Permit Schedule Approval/ Monitor Dept. Verification Form 53. Site safety plan Gas LC Grading Building - Building Building 54. Gas collection wells drilled Gss LC Grading Building Building Building 55. Monitoring system Gss LC Grading Building Building Building 56. Study of other hazardous constituents Geo/Soils LC Grading Building Building 57. Study of wells and flare . Geo/Soils LC Grading Building 58. Scrubber system Scrubber LC Grading Building 59. Evaluation of flare system Scrubber LC Grading Building Building 60. Relight system in flare Scrubber LC Grading Building 61. Gas monitor Scrubber LC Grading Building 62. Stormwater pollution prevention plan Civil Engineer UC/LC Grading Building Engineering RWOCB 63. Soils samples for BTEX Geo/Soils LC Grading Building 64. Evaluate existing vent systems Gee LC Grading Building Fire D.O.G. MUD 65. Air dispersion model Engineer UC/LC Grading Building Building Planning POMO 66. Gas monitoring equipment Remediation LC Building Building 67. Trench and monitor inferred fault Geo/ Soils/ Cs LC Grading Building 68. Structures designed for gas seepage protection Geotechnical Engineer Building Building Building 69. Plans sharing gas test borings for buildings Gee LC Grading Building 70. Passive gas collection systems Geotech/ Architect LC Building Grading Engineer 71. Plans sharing sealing from gas mitigation Geotech/ Architect LC Building Grading Engineer 72. Plans sharing Gas gas sensors Engineer LC Building Building Fire 73. Plans for gas accumulation in storage areas Mech. Eng. LC Building Building Page 4 i"h Mitigation Description Hoag Location Threshold/ Approval/ Verification Measure # Consultant Upper Campus Permit Monitor Dept. Form Lower Campus Schedule 74. Utilize explosimeter Mech. Eng. ID During Construction Fire 75. Monitoring during flare removal Gas LC During Construction Building 76. Scrubber system to remove H2S Remediation LC Grading Building Planning POND Remediation Geo/Soils LC Prior to Scrubber Installation Building Planning PCMD 77. Sampling and analysis protocol 78. Calibration and maintenance plan for scrubber equipment Remediation LC Prior to Scrubber Installation Building Planning POND 79. Sampling and analysis protocol Remediation LC Prior to Scrubber Installation Building Planning PLNvV 80. Calibration and maintenance plan for scrubber equipment Remediation LC Prior to Scrubber Installation Building Planning ACM - 81. Study to evaluate control equipment Remediation LC Prior to Scrubber Installation Building Planning POMD 82. District Rules #402 Public Nuisance 403 Fugitive Dust Civil Engineer Architect UC/LC Building Building Building 83. Hazardous Materials/ Waste Management Infection Waste (Hosp.) Engin. LC/UC Building Fire Preven. O FEA Verify Plans 84. Hazardous Materials/ Waste Management Infection Waste (Hosp.) Eng. LC/UC Building Fire Prevent. OO-CA Verity Plans 85. Waste Management/Storage Hazardous Materials for Expanded Facilities (Hosp.) LC/UC Ongoing Fire Prevent. O c Verify Plans 86. Air Toxic Rules--1401, 1403, 1405, 1415 AQMD are being carried out. (Hosp.) UC/LC Ongoing Planning POND Hoag Letter to Planning Director 87. Paved roadways done early in project - Phase I mass grading and paving Civil Engineer LC Phase I Building Hoag letter to Planning Director 88. Energy Efficient Building Systems Architect/ Engineers UC/LC Ongoing Building Building Plans 89. Employment of methods/materials where feasible to minimize VOC emissions (Hosp.) LC Ongoing Page 5 Mitigation Description Hoag Location Threshold/ Approval/ Verification Measure # Consultant Upper Campus Lower Campus Permit Schedule Monitor Dept. Form 90. Overhead power lines at Critical Care/Surgery Addition Architect Elec. Engin. Edison LC CCSAConst. Public Works CCSAPlans 91. Emergency fire access Civil Engineer UC/LC Grading Fire Dept. Public Works Phase I Civil Plans 92. Water saving devices and fixtures Mech. Engineer UC/LC Building Building Dept. Bldg. Plans 93. Water and sewer facilities Master Plan - Verify adequacy of existing facilities Civil Engineer UC/LC Grading Public Works Building Phase I Civil Plans 94. Fire sUCpression/sprinkler systems for all buildings Mech. Engineer UC/LC Building Fire Dept. Building Plans 95. Access Roads - Existing and new to become fire lanes Civil Engineer UC/LC Building Fire Dept. Phase I Civil Plans 96. Thermal Integrity - New buildings' time clocks, sensors & construction measures Architect Mech. Engin. UC/LC Building Building Dept. Architect. Plans 97. Window glazing, insulation & efficient ventilation in new building Architect Mech. Engin. UC/LC Building Building Architect. Bldg. Plans 98. Energy efficient building appliances Water heaters, furnaces & boilers Architect Mech. Engin. UC/LC Building Building Architect. Bldg. Plans 99. Solar Designs and solar heating Architect Mech. Engin. UC/LC Building Building Architect. Bldg. Plans 100. Soils disposal into environmentally cleared landfill Geo/Soils Civil UC/LC Grading Building Grading Phase I 101. Construction traffic phasing Contractor UC/LC Grading City Traffic Engineer Grading Doc./Permit 102. Haul routes for export material Chapter 15 NBM Code Contractor UC/LC Grading City Traffic Grading Doc./Permit 103. Public traffic disrUCtion Contractor UC/LC Grading City Traffic Grading Doc./Permit 104. Truck trip limits - 16 per hour from June 1 to Sept. 1 Contractor UC/LC Grading/ Building Public Works Grading Doc./Permit 105. Trucks will utilize covers to minimize material loss in transit. Contractor UC/LC Grading/ Building Public Works Grading Doc./Permit 106. Grading will be done in according with Grading Ordinance re: dust, erosion, noise. Civil Engineer Contractor UC/LC Grading Public Works Grading Doc./Permit 107. Grading to comply with AQMD Rules and Regulations Civil Engin. Contractor UC/LC Grading Public Works Grading Doc./Permit 108. Construction crew trip reduction plan for Contractors. Identify plan measures. Architect Contractor Civil Engin. UC/LC Grading/ Building Traffic Engineer Contractor Verification Page 6 Mitigation Description Hoag Location Threshold/ Approval/ Verification Measure # Consultant Upper Campus Permit Monitor Dept. Form Lower Campus Schedule 109. Stationary emissions factors for equipment used during construction utilizing SCAQMD Handbook Architect Contractor UC/LC Grading Planning Dept. Contractor Plans/ Contract 110. Low sulfur fuels to be verified for use in stationary equipment Architect Contractor UC/LC Grading/ Building Planning Dept. Contractor Plans/ Contract 111. Mufflers will be maintained on all engines and kept in proper tune Architect Contractor UC/LC Ongoing Planning Dept. Contractor Verification 112. Construction Activities - Hours of operation as defined by NB Municipal Code Architect Contractor UC/LC Ongoing Building Dept. Contractor 113. $250,000 for streetfront improvements on Newport Blvd. or reclaimed water facilities (Hosp.) UC/LC Ox Approval Planning City Receipt Dev. Agree. 114. E.R. Addition - Rooftop screening of mechanical equipment Architect UC/LC ER. Construction Building Dept. Architect Verification 115. E.R. Addition - Mechanical equipment not to exceed 55 dBA at property line Architect UC/LC E.R. Construction Building Dept. Architect Mech. Eng. Verification 116. Hoag to pay 75% of 24 ficus trees along property line with Villa Balboa (Hoag) LC Completed Planning Hoag Completed 117. Heliport Use - Limited to emergency medical care (Hoag) LC Ongoing Planning Hoag Policy 118. Hoag - Letter from City to OSHPD stating project conformance (Hoag) UC/LC Building Permit Planning City Letter of Verification 119. Loading Dock Services - non -vehicular activities - trash compactor 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. (Hoag) LC Ongoing Planning Hoag Policy 120. Acoustical/visual screen at Loading Dock - CCSA acoustical study requirements Architect Landscape Architect LC CM Permit/CCC Planning CCSA Design 121. CO Hotspot Analysis - Each individual Phase I, II, III as UC/LC Grading Planning Gas/I-bag , '. a Page 7 F = P'PE fir. P- PIA NI- t & 1:e-P r G= GeADTWG- HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN J ' •L t' 2 8/05/92 PRELIMINARY DRAFT ?W= rThbl / a We) rKa MITIGATION MEASURES MONITORING SUMMARY TABLE T cr_ Mitigation Description Hoag Location Threshold/ Approval/ Verification Measure # Consultant Upper Campus Permit Monitor Dept. Form Lower Campus Schedule 1,) y City Grading Standards Civil Engineer UC/LC Grading Building Bldq. Dept. 2 Cut Slope Monitoring Geo/Soils LC Grading Building Bldg. Dept. 3...) V Safe Grading/Faults Geo/Soils LC Grading Building Bldg. Dept. 45�� Seismic Building Standards UBC Architecture UC/LC Building Building Bldq. Dept. ' J LRC Geo Report 6/89 Geo/Soils Architect LC Grading Building Building Bldg. Dept. ft:- _ Soil Corrosivity Tests Geo/Soils LC Grading Building Bldg. Dept. 7., -` /' I. ' Y Soils Corrosivity Construction Compatibility Geo/Soils Architect LC Building Building Bldg. Dept. 8: '! Corrosivity Neutralization Geo/Soils LC Building Building '- Bldg. Dept. 1 yLandscape Silt, Dust, Runoff Civil Engineer LC Building Building Bldg. Dept. 10 ,d Landscape Plan Landscape Architect Grading PBR/ Planning ,/ 1i.f Yi Routine Vacuuming N/A OCWater MP County Planning ((((((12��j, / / Hydrologic Analysis �stor&jStl{-Q{iort Con -trot Geo/Soils Civil Engineer LC Grading/ Building Building V�C1CB Bldg. Dept, (1 ,-'F / [ Groundwater Analysis Dewaterinq and Subdrains Geo/Soils Civil Engineer LC Grading/ Building Building Bldg. Dept. 14. Dewatering Permits and Discharge Permits Geo/Soils Civil Engineer LC Grading/ Building WCQB NPDES WOCEI Bldg. Dept. 15. /y f L Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Infection Control FD&C Engineering . LC/UC N/A N/A N/A 16. Wetlands Agencies Review Requirements Wetland Biologist LC Big Canyon Wetland Mitigation Permits KrF OJC F&G F&W City City CCC 17. Wetlands Mitigation Plan Agencies Jurisdiction Wetland Biologists LC Big Canyon Wetland Mitigation Permits � F&G F&W CJC City City OJC 18. Final Wetland Mitigation Plan Wetland Biologists LC Big Canyon Grading/WL Mitigation Permits � Or F&G F&W City OJC 0 Q. 449L)tC c� P57) t3 • Mitigation Description I -bag Location Threshold/ Approval/ Verification Measure # Consultant Upper Campus Permit Monitor Dept. Form Lower Campus Schedule 19. Wetland Mitigation Plan Provisions/Monitoring Wetland Biologist Big Canyon Grading/WL Mitigation Permits POLE CCC F8G F&W City CCC 2p: �� Final Wetland Mitigation Plan Requirements Grading, Plant Lists, Monitoring Programs Wetland Biologist Big Canyon Wetland Mitigation Permit POLE CM City CCC City F&G F&W Archeologist Monitoring of Mass Grading Architect Paleontologist, LC Grading Building Bldg. Dept. ?ll. ' Paleontologist Monitoring of Mass Grading Architect Paleontologist LC Grading Building Bldg. Dept. 23.1' i �/ Fence Along Villa Balboa Common Property Line N/A ID N/A City Engineering Bldg. Dept. I 2 i( 1% MP Project Approvals & Documents MP/PC Text/EIR/Gradinq Permits/Building Permits Varies UC/LC Grading Permit Varies Ongoing / i' Phase I - Subsequent Studies TPO Volume Analysis Phases II & III To Be Determined UC/CC End of Phase 1 City Planning/ Traffic Dept. City Planning & Traffic a. " r 40 Prior to Phase I Traffic - Trip Generation , Not to Exceed 1338 PM Peak Hour To Be Determined UC/LC Prior to Phase 1/ Grading City Planning/ Traffic City 27. - After Phase I Trip Generation for Phases II & III - To Be Determined UC/LC Grading Phase II City Traffic Planning Dept. City 28 Future AQMD Regulations Varies UC/LC Ongoing POW POND — City 29 'Y City Transportation Demand Management Ordinance O.C. Congestion Management To Be Determined LO Ongoing City/County City/ County / V Public Transit Bus Stops N4 UC/LC Ongoing City Traffic OCTD/City �3ff. 31. Westside Roadway Traffic Control - Pilot Program Traffic LC Grading Planning Planning 32. Y Traffic Generated Parking Rates Subsequent to Phase I Traffic UC/LC Phase Completion Planning Traffic Traffic 33. Internal Roadways Circulation Civil Engineer UC/LC Grading Public Works/ Traffic 34. ,� . 1' • , V Intersection Improvements Hospital Road/Placentia Avenue Civil Engineer Traffic UC/LC Grading Traffic Engineer City Traffic Engineer 1 ' 35. / V.' Employee Rideshare/Trip Reduction AQMDReq.XV Transportation Coordinator N/A N/A Transportation Transpo Coordinad. T Page 2 Mitigation Description Hoag Location Threshold/ Approval/ Verification Measure # Consultant Upper Campus Permit Monitor Dept. Form Lower Campus Schedule \f, RegulatedReulair emissions equipment permits through Mech. Engin. Architect UC/LC Grading/ Building Planning POND Planning i P12D c _ 37, / Energy efficient lighting incorporated into design Elec. Engineer UC/LC Grading/ Building Planning Planning E Ordinance #91-16-5% Carpool Parking Lockers, Rideshare Information Planning Coordinator UC/LC Grading/ Building Planning Traffic Eng. Planning Traffic Enq. 39. /Bike Noise Levels 65 CNEL at On -Site Outdoor Hospital r'" Mech. Eng. Architect Traffic Engin. UC/LC N/A N/A N/A yAreas ,• i - : , % 1 40 /, Interior Noise Levels, 45 CNEL Below Architect Mech. Engin. UC/LC N/A N/A N/A 41 Existing Exhaust Fan - New building are mitigated re: noise levels. Architect/ Acoustical Mech. Eng. UC/LC Grading/ Building Planning Planning ° ,^ 42,J/1�, s ;ice y City to send letter to emergency vehicle company to cut off sirens. Paramedic Coordinator N/A N/A N/A N/A (43» '7 y Landscape and irrigation plans to be developed for each building/project by licensed landscape architect. Landscape Architect UC/LC Grading/ Building Planning/ PBR/ Public Works Building Dept. ( 44 / (ril \/1 Lighting and window systems for west side of UCper Campus to minimize light spillage Architect Elec. Engin. ID Building Building Building 45. / Y Mechanical and trash screen from public view Architect UC/LC Building Planning/ Building Planning/ Building 46. No major mechanical equipment on LC rooftops - Conceal and screen Architect Mech. Eng. LC Building Planning/ ' Building Planning/ Building 47,-7 7•Architect Linear Park - Dedicate grade and improve. Civil Eng. Landscape LC Building/ Grading Planning ' PBR, PW Building Building PBR 48. EIR Conformance - View impacts verified for each L C building Model Maker LC Building Planning Planning 49) Hazardous materials/waste management Infectious Waste (Hosp.) Eng. LC N/A N/A State Agencies Building/ D.O.G. ' 50. Reabandonment of oil wells as LC Building Building/D.O.G . 51. Collection of gas samples at Newport Beach Townhomes Gss LC Grading Building Building, C 52. Soil gas sampling and monitoring program Ga; LC Grading Building Build, ... p TP Page 3 ! Mitigation Description I -bag Location Threshold/ Approval/ Verification Measure # Consultant Upper Campus Permit Monitor Dept. Form Lower Campus Schedule 53. < 'A Site safety plan Cs LC Grading Building Building Building 54. ,g u [tf� Gas collection wells drilled C LC Grading Building Building Building 55.��' Monitoring system Gas LC Grading Building Building Building 5;6.. ' Study of other hazardous constituents Geo/Soils LC Grading Building Building 570 Study of wells and flare Geo/Soils LC Grading Building 58:' Scrubber system Scrubber LC Grading Building 59. Evaluation of flare system Scrubber LC Grading Building Building • 60. Relight system In flare Scrubber LC Grading Building 61. . Gas monitor Scrubber LC Grading Building 62 _ Storg7water pollution prevention plan _, ._ _! Civil Engineer UC/LC Grading Building Engineering R\MDCB 63. Solis samples for BTEX Geo/Soils LC Grading Building 64. Evaluate existing vent systems Ces LC Grading Building Fire D.O.G. /LIVID 65. Air dispersion model Engineer UC/LC Grading Building Building Planning ACMD 66. Y Gas monitoring equipment Remediation LC - Building Building 67. / Trench and monitor inferred fault Geo/ Soils/ Gas LC Grading Building 68. Structures designed for gas seepage protection Geotechnical Engineer Building Building Building 69. Plans sharing gas test borings for buildings C-ss LC Grading Building 70. Passive gas collection systems Geotech/ Architect W Building Grading Engineer 71. Plans sharing sealing from gas mitigation Geotech/ Architect LC Building Grading Engineer l 72. • Plans sharing Gas gas sensors Engineer LC Building Building Fire 73. Plans for gas accumulation in storage areas Mech. Eng. LC Building Building Page 4 Mitigation Description Haag Location Threshold/ Approval/ Verification Measure * Consultant Upper Campus Permit Monitor Dept. Form Lower Campus Schedule 74. Utilize explosimeter Mech. Eng. LC During Construction Fire 75. Monitoring during flare removal Gas 1C During Construction Building 76. , 11 / / Scrubber system to remove H2S —plansbe- Remediation LC Grading Building Planning POND Sattt.r. i v' rvt 1ST 1493 77. / Sampling and analysis protocol Remediation Geo/Soils LC Prior to Scrubber Installation Building Planning ACM 78. Calibration and maintenance plan for scrubber equipment Remediation LC Prior to Scrubber Installation Building Planning PQMD 79. Sampling and analysis protocol Remediation LC Prior to • Scrubber Installation Building Planning POW 80. Calibration and maintenance plan for scrubber equipment Remediation LC Prior to Scrubber Installation Building Planning POND 81. Study to evaluate control equipment Remediation LC Prior to Scrubber Installation Building Planning POND 82. n . District Rules #402 Public Nuisance 403 Fugitive Dust Civil Engineer Architect UC/LC Building Building Building 8 / �/I._ , i Hazardous Materials/ Waste Management Infection Waste (Hosp.) Engin. LC/UC Building Fire Preven. OCFCA Verify Plans 84: / _ / 4-V Y Hazardous Materials/ Waste Management Infection Waste (Hosp.) Eng. LC/UC Building Fire Prevent. A Verify Plans (85 j 1 Waste Management/Storage Hazardous Materials for Expanded Facilities (Hosp.) LC/UC Ongoing Fire Prevent. OC1- A Verify Plans --8'6. Air Toxic Rules--1401, 1403, 1405, 1415 AQMD are being carried out. (Hosp.) UC/LC Ongoing Planning ' NNvD Hoag Letter to Planning Director 87. , � it \' Paved roadways done early In project - Phase I mass grading and paving Civil Engineer LC Phase I Building Hoag letter to Planning Director 88.) "� Energy Efficient Building Systems Architect/ Engineers UC/LC Ongoing Building Building A. Plans 89. )/ .\' / Employment of methods/materials where feasible to minimize VOC emissions (Hosp.) LC Ongoing PP F 41/4 Page 5 1,/ Mitigation Description Hoag Location Threshold/ Approval/ Verification Measure # Consultant Upper Campus Permit Monitor Dept. Form Lower Campus Schedule 90 rm. Overhead power lines at Critical Care/Surgery Addition Architect Elec. Engin. Edison W CCSAConst Public Works CCSAPlans , %1 Y Emergency fire access Civil Engineer UC/LC Grading - Fire Dept. Public Works Phase 1 Civil Plans 9?J Water saving devices and fixtures Mech. Engineer UC/LC Building Building Dept. Bldg. Plans 9 / Water and sewer facilities Master Plan - Verify adequacy of existing facilities Civil Engineer UC/LC Grading Public Works Building Phase I Civil Plans 94! Fire sUCpression/sprinkler systems for all buildings Mech. Engineer UC/LC Building Fire Dept. Building Plans 95' Access Roads - Existing and new to become fire lanes Civil Engineer UC/LC Building Fire Dept. Phase I Civil Plans 96. ' Thermal Integrity - New buildings' time clocks, sensors & construction measures Architect Mech. Engin. UC/LC Building Building Dept. Architect. Plans (9 ynew y Window glazing, insulation & efficient ventilation In building Architect Mech. Engin. UC/LC Building Building Architect. Bldg. Plans Energy efficient building appliances Water heaters, furnaces & boilers Architect Mech. Engin. UC/LC Building Building Architect. Bldg. Plans 99 . / Solar Designs and solar heating Architect Mech. Engin. UC/LC , Building Building Architect. Bldg. Plans 100. Soils disposal into environmentally cleared landfill Geo/Soils Civil UC/LC Grading Building Grading Phase I 101. Construction traffic phasing Contractor UC/LC Grading City Traffic Engineer Grading Doc./Permmit 102 ' / V Haul routes for export material Chapter 15 NBM Code Contractor UC/LC Grading City Traffic Grading Doc./Permit 103. ' i Public traffic disrUCtion Contractor UC/LC Grading _ City Traffic Grading Doc./Permit 104. - Truck trip limits - 16 per hour from June 1 to Sept. 1 Contractor UC/LC Grading/ Building Public Works Grading . Doc./Pernlit 105. Y Trucks will utilize covers to minimize material loss in transit. Contractor UC/LC Grading/ Building Public Works Grading Doc./Permit 106 VOrdinance Grading will be done in according with Grading re: dust, erosion, noise. Civil Engineer Contractor UC/LC Grading Public Works Grading Doc./Permit 107. ; Grading to comply with AQMD Rules and Regulations Civil Engin. Contractor UC/LC Grading Public Works Grading Doc./Permit 108. j Construction crew trip reduction plan for Contractors. Identify plan measures. Architect Contractor Civil Engin. UC/LC Grading/ Building Traffic Engineer Contractor Verification Page 6 �'11i17 iv:. Mitigation Description Location Threshold/ Approval/ Verification Fbag Measure # Consultant Upper Campus Permit Monitor Dept. Form Lower Campus Schedule 109. Stationary emissions factors for equipment used during construction utilizing SCAQMD Handbook Architect Contractor UC/LC Grading Planning Dept. Contractor Plans/ i Contract 110. --\ Y Low sulfur fuels to be verified for use In stationary equipment Architect Contractor UC/LC Grading/ Building Planning Dept. Contractor Plans/ Contract 111 " Mufflers will be maintained on all engines and kept in proper tune Architect Contractor UC/LC Ongoing Planning Dept. Contractor Verification /Y 11Vh - Construction Activities - Hours of operation as defined by NB Municipal Code Architect Contractor UC/LC , Ongoing Building Dept. Contractor t/} ems/ $250,000 for streetfront improvements on Newport Bivd. or reclaimed water facilities (Hosp.) UC/LQ Ox ' Approval Planning City Receipt Dev. Agree. 1,f _' E.R. Addition - Rooftop screening of mechanical equipment Architect UC/LC ER. Construction Building Dept. Architect Verification -, � Y 1 5. - j li ; r' . E.R. Addition - Mechanical equipment not to exceed 55 dBA at property line Architect UC/LC ER. Construction Building Dept. Architect Mech. Eng. Verification 1)6., t f y ' Hoag to pay 75% of 24 ficus trees along property line with Villa Balboa (Hoag) 1.0 Completed Planning Hoag Completed 117. Heliport Use - Limited to emergency medical care (Hoag) W Ongoing Planning Hoag Policy 1'18._` ;/ ' ``S ;�1' fy Hoag - Letter from City to OSHPD stating project conformance (Hoag) UC/LC Building Permit Planning City Letter of Verification 119. 4 � tin�/ ' Loading Dock Services - non -vehicular activities - trash compactor 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. (Hoag) l� Ongoing Planning Hoag Policy 120. / Acoustical/visual screen at Loading Dock - CCSA acoustical study requirements Architect Landscape Architect LC C S4 Permit/CDC Planning CCSADesign 121. '`—' CO Hotspot Analysis - Each individual Phase I, II, III Cos UC/LC Grading Planning Gas/Hoag 1g2 MartUAnlc.. Gs-$ e-touter eA vs (.IeW5 b y �c.ree✓l,nta device$ \` Jp Page 7 i� ft A N N (NIL, �= GeADt ttG HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN 3 8/05/92 PRELIMINARY DRAFT Fig_ �� !, c � Vo r MITIGATION MEASURES MONITORING SUMMARYTABLE 7- 1- = f-1g& r 1 Mitigation Measure # l lv1 be -- Description Haag Consultant Location Upper Campus Threshold/ Permit Schedule Approval/ Monitor Dept. Verification Form 1) - City Grading Standards Civil Engineer UC/LC Grading Building Bldg. Dept. ( 2. Cut Slope Monitoring Geo/Soils LC Grading Building Bldg. Dept. 3J Safe Grading/Faults Geo/Soils LC Grading Building Bldg. Dept. 4.) Seismic Building Standards UBC Architecture UC/LC Building Building Bldg Dept. 5.) / LRC Geo Report 6/89 Geo/Soils Architect LC Grading Bulldinq Building Bldg. Dept. 6. Soil Corrosivity Tests t' C. Geo/Soils LC Grading Bulldinq Bldg. Dept. 7.; '/„ Soils Corrosivity r Construction Compatibility — 1_' Geo/Soils Architect LC Building Building Bldg. Dept. ,V 8. /! , „�/ Corrosivity Neutralization % !1' Geo/Soils LC Building Building - Bldg. Dept. 1 / Silt, Dust, Runoff Civil Engineer Landscape LC Building Building Bldg. Dept. 10, f l 't Landscape Plan Landscape Architect Grading PBR/ Planning 11. Pr% " �qq Routine Vacuuming ((-fl4 tL.AX. �P/-i N/A OC Water MP County Planning t 12i' . .'-I, Hydrologic Analysis gXostor4ISt1l-ct-4bot� Co✓rt-rot Geo/Soils Civil Engineer LC Grading/ Building Building WCCB Bldg. Dept. • 1 13 Groundwater Analysis Dewatering and Subdrains Geo/Soils Civil Engineer LC Grading/ Building Building Bldg. Dept. �\I 14. Dewatering Permits and ' Discharge Permits � _ /� Geo/Soils Civil Engineer LC Grading/ Building WCOB NPDES WOC8 Bldg. Dept. 15. Hazardous Materials and Waste Management / Infection Control /�(-% FD&C Engineering LC/UC N/A N/A N/A 1 6. Wetlands AgenciesRequirements 6T, c �1X2 TheefrgraBiologist �ZGG¢ZLUw 7lv / i Wetland LC Big Canyon Wetland Mitigation Permits PLCECC Ox FRG F&W City City O7C 17. Wetland Mitigation Plan Agencies Jurisdiction / 1� Wetland Biologists LC Big Canyon Wetland Mitigation Permits M F F&G F&W City City Cx 18. Final Wetland Mitigation Plan �. Wetland Biologists LC Big Canyon Grading/WL Mitigation PermitsF PCCE CCC W City OTC �� \\f., -Nt'C'ps Gqt 3 E Z Pad evte/4 1 B Mitigation Measure # Description I -bag Consultant Location Upper Campus Lower Campus Threshold/ Permit Schedule Approval/ Monitor Dept. Verification Form 19. Wetland Mitigation Plan Provisions/Monitoring / o r - . �.- Wetland Biologist Big Canyon Grading/WL Mitigation Permits FOrE CL>; F&G F&W City CD; 20. / Final Wetland Mitigation Plan Requirements Grading, Plant Lists, Monitoring Programs /-- Wetland Biologist Big Canyon Wetland Mitigation Permit CP OM City F&G F&W CD; City 21. Archeologist Monitoring of Mass Grading i 4 Architect Paleontologist LC Grading Building Bldg. Dept. 22. , / Paleontologist Monitoring of Mass Grading J �� / Architect Paleontologist LC Grading Building Bldg. Dept. 23. / �yJ Fence Along Villa Balboa Common Property' Line N/A W N/A City Engineering Bldg. Dept. ( r/ MP Project Approvals & Documents Varies UC/CC Grading Permit Varies Ongoing 25. , Phase 1- Subsequent Studies TPO Volume Analysis Phases II & III To Be Determined UC/CC End of Phase I City Planning/ Traffic Dept. City Planning & Traffic 26. Prior to Phase I Traffic - Trip Generation - Not to Exceed 1338 PM Peak Hour v f b' To Be Determined UC/LO Prior to Phase 1/ Grading City Planning/ Traffic City 27. v After Phase I Trip Generation for Phases II & 111 ;a.-, (_ .' To Be Determined UC/LG Grading Phase II City Traffic Planning Dept. City 28. fr _�c Future AQMD Regulations Varies UC/CC Ongoing POD PavD - City 2 City Transportation Demand Management Ordinance O.C. Congestion Management / __II .. To Be Determined to Ongoing City/County City/ County 30. �/ ' Public Transit Bus Stops L.( .. N4 UC/LO Ongoing City Traffic OCTD/City 31. A " ` Westslde Roadway Traffic Control - Pilot Program Traffic LC Grading Planning Planning 32. ! Traffic Generated Parking Rates Subsequent to Phase I Traffic UC/CC Phase I Completion Planning Traffic Traffic 33. Internal Roadways Circulation - / `✓ / Civil Engineer UC/LG Grading Public Works/ Traffic 34. v/ Intersection Improvements Hospital Road/Placentia Avenue Civil Engineer Traffic UC/CC Grading Traffic Engineer City Traffic Engineer < 35. % 1 ¢f V, Employee Rideshare/Trip Reduction AQMDReg.XV Transportation Coordinator N/A N/A Transportation Coordinator Transport., Coordina dk _ N. /1 Page 2 T T -r Mitigation Measure # Description Hoag Consultant Location Upper Campus Lower Campus Threshold/ Permit Schedule Approval/ Monitor Dept. Verification Form y Y Regulated air emissions equipment permits through Mech. Engin. Architect UC/LC Grading/ Building Planning POvD Planning PC D 37,,1 / Energy efficient lighting incorporated into design Elec. Engineer UC/LC Grading/ Building Planning Planning E sr,. 38.,E 1 Ordinance #91-16-5% Carpool Parking Planning Coordinator UC/LC Grading/ Building Planning Traffic Eng. Planning Traffic Enq. 39., / Noise Levels 65 CNEL at On -Site Outdoor Hospital Areas Mech. Eng. Architect Traffic Engin. UC/LC N/A N/A N/A e--�. 40» / >...� Interior Noise Levels, 45 CNEL Below Architect Mech. Engin. UC/LC N/A N/A N/A !JP � / Existing Exhaust Fan - New building are mitigated re: noise levels. Architect/ Acoustical Mech. Eng. UC/LC Grading/ Building Planning Planning ( 42�' / ' Y City to send letter to emergency vehicle company to cut off sirens. Paramedic Coordinator N/A N/A N/A N/A 43; / y Landscape and irrigation plans to be developed for each building/project by licensed landscape architect. Landscape Architect UC/LC Grading/ Building Planning/ PBR/ Public Works Building 1 Dept. f 44 V - —' I tl Lighting and window systems for west side of UCper Campus to minimize Tight spillage Architect Elec. Engin. LC Building Building Building (4�51 Kt. y Mechanical and trash screen from public view Architect UC/LC Building Planning/ Building Planning/ Building 46. 1 No major mechanical equipment op LC rooftops - Architect Mech. Eng. LC Building Planning/ ` Building Planning/ Building 47.- - ,1Architect Linear Park - Dedicate grade and improve. Civil Eng. Landscape LC Building/ Grading Planning ' PBR, PW Building Building PBR 48. 1 EIR Conformance - View impacts verified for /eaach L C building Model Maker LC Building Planning Planning .-z. Hazardous materials/waste management Infectious Waste (Hosp.) Eng. LC N/A N/A State Agencies 50. C;,. Reabandonment of oil wells as LC Building Building/D.O.G Building/ D.O.G. 51. I.Collection of gas samples at Newport Beach Gss LC Grading Building Building 52. 1 Soil gas sampling and monitoring program Gas LC Grading Building Build, iltg,• Page 3 I n I r cc"' 9, Aro Mitigation Measure # Description Hoag Consultant Location Upper Campus Lower Campus Threshold/ Permit Schedule Approval/ Monitor Dept. Verification Form 53. Site safety plan as LC Grading Building Building Building b4. Gas collection wells drilled as LC Grading Building Building Building 55. Monitoring system Gs; LC Grading Building Building Building 56. Study of other hazardous constituents_ Geo/Soils LC Grading Building Building 57. Y- Study of wells and flare r ('1.'= , L .0 t if I if �-' Geo/Soils LC Grading Building 1 58. ' t—• Scrubber system. -, ,./ t 4 IP,, \ . 1 _- Scrubber LC Grading Building 59. Evaluation of flare systetn Scrubber LC Grading Building Building 60. Relight system In flare Scrubber ID Grading Building 61. Gas monitor Scrubber LC Grading Building 62f Stogpwater pollution prevention plan _ , Civil Engineer UC/LC Grading Building Engineering RyVC CB 63. ? % Soils samples for BTEX ;) I'. r, _' -_ Geo/Soils IA Grading Building 64. ' Evaluate existing vent systems Gas LC Grading Building Fire D.O.C. ACIVD 65. J Air dispersion model Engineer UC/LC Grading Building Building Planning AavD UrQ',"J'I 66. Gas monitoring equipment Remediation LC - Building Building .=�/' 67. in"' // IJ Trench and monitor inferred fault Geo/ Soils/ Gas LC Grading Building 68. Structures designed for gas seepage protection Geotechnical Engineer Building Building Building 69. Plans sharing gas test borings for buildings Gss LC Grading Building 70. Passive gas collection systems Geotech/ Architect LC Building Grading Engineer 71. Plans sharing sealing from gas mitigation Geotech/ Architect LC Building Grading Engineer /. 72. • Plans sharing Gas gas sensors Engineer LC Building Building Fire 73. Plans for gas accumulation in storage areas Mech. Eng. LC Building Building PL AG- Page 4 t^ Mitigation Measure # Description I-baf Consultant Location Upper Campus Lower Campus Threshold/ Permit Schedule Approval/ Monitor Dept. Verification Form 74. Utilize explosimeter Mech. Eng. LC During Construction Fire 75. Monitoring during flare removal Cs LC During Construction Building 76. / � Scr(ubber system to remove H2S '-olan5 4-D be Sobtai•� 13y M 1R43 / „ ! t_.-{..,, Remediation LC- Grading Building Planning POND ( `'elf 77. ` Sampling and analysis protocol Remediation Geo/Soils LC Prior to Scrubber Installation Building Planning AQfvD 78. Calibration and maintenance plan for scrubber equipment Remediation LC Prior to Scrubber Installation Building Planning ACt1) 79. Sampling and analysis protocol Remediation LC Prior to - Scrubber Installation Building Planning POW 80. Calibration and maintenance plan for scrubber equipment Remediation LC Prior to Scrubber Installation Building Planning POND 81. Study to evaluate control equipment Remediation LC Prior to Scrubber Installation Building Planning AQMD 82. „--.., - District Rules #402 Public Nuisance 403 Fugitive Dust Civil Engineer Architect UC/LC Building Building Building 83.. • ff , Hazardous Materials/ Waste Management Infection Waste (Hosp.) Engin. LC/UC Building Fire Preven. COCA Verify Plans 84.i 7 Y' Hazardous Materials/ Waste Management Infection Waste (Hosp.) Eng. LC/UO Building Fire Prevent. OOC4 Verify Plans 85. / —. 1 4 - Waste Management/Storage Hazardous Materials for Expanded Facilities (Hosp.) LC/UC Ongoing Fire Prevent. OU-CA Verify Plans , 86. , !y Air Toxic Rules--1401, 1403, 1405, 1415 AQMD are being carried out. (Hosp.) UC/LC Ongoing Planning AQMD Hoag Letter to Planning Director 87. \I1 o' 1\I, ( (Paved roadways done early In project - Phase I mass grading and paving t�/ Civil Engineer LC Phase I Building Hoag letter to Planning Director ( 8&: sue. Energy Efficient Building Systems Architect/ Engineers UC/LC Ongoing Building • Building 1 Plans (89. ,/ Employment of methods/materials_tyherelfeasible to minimize VOC emissions CA t t 1 k_ (Hosp.) LC Ongoing F Page 5 6 Mitigation Measure # Description Hoag Consultant Location Upper Campus Lower Campus Threshold/ Permit Schedule Approval/ Monitor Dept. Verification Form 90 1 'y `' r Overhead power lines at Critical Care/Surgery Addition Architect Elec. Engin. Edison LC CCSAConst. Public Works CCSAPIans - iT 91 Emergency fire access Civil Engineer UC/LC Grading Fire Dept. Public Works Phase I Civil Plans 9 J; I Water saving devices and fixtures Mech. Engineer UC/LC Building Building Dept. Bldg. Plans 93.) /v ��. Water and sewer facilities Master Plan - Verify adequacy of existing facilities Civil Engineer UC/LC Grading Public Works Building Phase 1 Civil Plans / 94. }` ! s Fire sUCpression/sprinkler systems for all buildings Mech. Engineer UC/LC Building Fire Dept. Building Plans 95.) 1 or, Y Access Roads - Existing and new to become fire lanes Civil Engineer UC/LC Building Fire Dept. Phase I Civil Plans 96.j (, :( Thermal Integrity - New buildings' time clocks, sensors & construction measures Architect Mech. Engin. UC/LC Building Building Dept. Architect. Plans .97.j 7 �-. t� Window glazing, Insulation & efficient ventilation In new building Architect Mech. Engin. UC/LC Building Building Architect. Bldg. Plans 98,/ / //�sGG Y Energy efficient building appliances Water heaters, furnaces & boilers Architect Mech. Engin. UC/LC Building Building Architect.. Bldq. Plans • 99.1 / k,;< Solar Designs and solar heating Architect Mech. Engin. UC/LC Building Building Architect. Bldg. Plans 100. .. Soils disposal into environmentally cleared landfill [�(� Geo/Soils Civil UC/LC Grading Building Grading Phase I 101. ` / . Construction traffic phasing Contractor UC/LC Grading City Traffic Engineer Grading Doc./Permit _ 1102i0 Haul routes for export material Chapter 15 NBM Code Contractor UC/LC Grading City Traffic Grading Doc./Permit _$4 103. .. / . Public traffic disrUCtion Contractor UC/LC Grading City Traffic Grading Doc./Permit 10 1'1,,, Pl% Truck trip limits - 16 per hour from June 1 to Sept. 1 Contractor UC/LC Grading/ Building Public Works Grading . Doc./Perniit , ' 105. %,-'(, Trucks will utilize covers to minimize material loss In transit. Contractor UC/LC Grading/ Building Public Works Grading Doc./Permit 106j. J, \ J Grading will be done in according with Grading Ordinance re: dust, erosion, noise. Civil Engineer Contractor UC/LC Grading Public Works Grading Doc./Permit (1� ; Grading to comply with AOMD Rules and Regulations Civil Engin. Contractor UC/LC Grading Public Works Grading Doc./Permit 11 8. , Construction crew trip reduction plan for Contractors. Identify plan measures. Architect Contractor Civil Engin. UC/LC Grading/ Building Traffic Engineer Contractor Verification Page 6 { Mitigation Description Hoag Location Threshold/ Approval/ Verification Measure # Consultant Upper Campus Permit Monitor Dept. Form Lower Campus Schedule 109. vi' l /U Stationary emissions factors for equipment used during construction utilizing SCAQMD Handbook ,-. " Architect Contractor UC/LC Grading Planning Dept. Contractor Plans/ I Contract 1 10. j Low sulfur fuels to be verified for use in stationary equipment Architect Contractor UC/LC Grading/ Building Planning Dept. Contractor f Plans/ Contract r"". Y 11 1. b, ' �y 7. 7 Mufflers will be maintained on all engines and kept in proper tune Architect Contractor UC/LC Ongoing Planning Dept. Contractor ( Verification 1;13'1* Construction Activities - Hours of operation as defined by NB Municipal Code Architect Contractor UC/LC Ongoing Building Dept. Contractor 113. .. rr $250,000 for streetfront improvements on Newport a Blvd. or reclaimed water facilities (Hosp.) UC/LC MC Approval Planning City Receipt Dev. Agree. 1 14. ' E.R. Addition - Rooftop screening of mechanical equipment Architect UC/LC ER. Construction Building Dept. Architect Verification 115. ' ri ER. Addition - Mechanical equipment not to exceed 55 dBA at property line Architect UC/LC ER. Construction Building Dept. Architect Mech. Eng. Verification 116. i" 1ri Hoag to pay 75% of 24 ficus trees along property line with Villa Balboa (Hoag) LC Completed Planning Hoag Completed 1 17. A Heliport Use - Limited to emergency medical care (Hoag) LC Ongoing Planning Hoag Policy 118. \/ Hoag - Letter from City to OSHPD stating project conformance (Hoag) UC/LC Building Permit Planning City Letter of Verification 119. Coading Dock Services - non -vehicular activities - trash compactor 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. (Hoag) LC Ongoing Planning Hoag Policy - ,' e 120 / Acoustical/visualscree0.at Loading Dock - Architect Landscape Architect ID CCS4 Permit/CCC Planning CCSADesign CCSA acoustical study requirements 121. CO Hotspot Analysis - Each individual Phase I, II, III las UC/LC Grading Planning Gas/Hoag (g- `. NIE<T6.4AtJe r!naler C° /)S (j 4. y cr rce✓I l rUJ [ ceps ....� / rp 6 Pw P f Page 7 .1_____. -W. -ni e9 7 mar Zg -Jae) ! - - - i, ii i S(2� _ O f7 97° / 9c//1- rrwa •IF riff Wr.WTn'Wwyr -WrWINIWTO WIF W IrrirWW-W-W wwwww ida4-Jfer 149 Ca-) - ea.4aot`� rrrPPrrrprrrwprrwrrrnww.rn..n..rnwnrn,rnnrnrn-n eta!, _ a/W-41D 4lege 2110 Pr - D. ca • kkaozatz--, -941r.g 4.67;60-x_e Sx176 yeifyi),0 ategyiLet r... r.11...7, rrr „nr... -. WNW • _. a A J - \A WW1r• 1 r1 1' • Win fl act; a'2 z rX �i a. w _2 0 PHASE VI Approx. 16 months construction PHASE V PHASE III Approx. 16 months conslruclion PHASE IV Approx. 16 months construction Approx. 16 months construction t. �t1( v'Jh11;f: , it . l ^LLar7N; ,�`� 1t 'sit •�� . r `hfns��.; ;ter°"'' ' fi 1 ;,$� 4�� %• ,,j .. s ss vrr.��r ,7� tt f I Inkro Cll'r.'�"',tY�;"4Ft•�..rrf,le E4Tt Cs �I ''- "It IIOA(; AIEA(OIDAL HOSPITAL Plt[;SIIYTI'It1A1V . ',DIVE'? CAMPUS 111ASSINC STUDY S -r Altie . '. 'ld• b H w A Y PHASE 11 ' Approx. 16 months conslruclion PHASE 1 '" ,Lynn Approx. 18 months construction POTENTfgL PROJECT PHASING